Log in

View Full Version : Chase Bank and Obama's "Make Home Affordable" Scam



chlamor
08-26-2010, 08:13 AM
Chase Bank and Obama's "Make Home Affordable" Scam

by Ted Rall

SOMEWHERE IN AFGHANISTAN--It isn't surprising, what with the world falling apart and all, that the world scarcely noticed that I lost my job as an editor in April 2009. Why should it? I was one of millions of Americans who lost their job that month.

But it mattered to me.

It wasn't all bad. No more early morning commutes. And no more Lisa. Lisa was my boss. My mean boss. My mean and crazy boss. In the long run, I stand to save thousands of dollars on therapy.

In the meantime, however, one visit with HR cost more than half my annual income. (My ex-employer, the Scripps media conglomerate, offered just four weeks severance pay--if I agreed not to work as a journalist for the rest of my life. Needless to say, I refused.) Just like that, I was broke.

The bills, of course, kept coming. Including my home mortgage. Unlike many people, I was conservative. When I bought, in 2004, I put down more than 50 percent of the purchase price. Refusing an adjustable-rate mortgage, I took out a vanilla 30-year fixed-rate mortgage from Chase Home Finance LLC.

My monthly nut, a combined payment of $2200 for the loan plus local property tax, didn't seem so bad in '04. But property taxes went up. Now I'm shelling out over $2700--on half the income. I'm still making my payments on time, but only by borrowing from a home equity line of credit.

I'm not in foreclosure. But it's easy to see how, if this keeps up, I will be. The credit line isn't limitless. The more I borrow, the higher my payments on that. My cash flow is a disaster.

So I asked Chase for help.

Responding to political pressure to cut distressed homeowners a break, the big banks who destroyed global capitalism in 2008--including Chase--agreed to the Obama Administration's request to create a program to assist distressed homeowners. The result was "Make Home Affordable." (Nice name.)

From Chase's website: "No matter what your individual situation is, you may have options. Whether your want to stay in your home or sell it, we may be able to help."

Key word: "May." Translation: "May" = "Won't."

As I can now attest from personal experience, "Make Home Affordable" is a scam. MHA is cited by bank ads as evidence that they get it, that their "greed is good" days are over, that we don't need to nationalize the sons of bitches and ship them off to reeducation labor camps.

In reality, it exists solely to give banks like Chase political cover. They deliberately give homeowners the runaround, dragging out the process so they can foreclose. As of the end of 2009, only four percent of applicants received any help. By June 2010 the vast majority of that "lucky" four percent had lost their homes anyway--because the amount of relief they got was too small.

I was a banker in the '80s. I often travel to the former USSR, where sloppy paperwork gives the police the right to rob you blind. So I know how to navigate bureaucracy. I'm careful. Thorough. When, among other things--many, many other things--Chase asked me for copies of my bank statements, I knew to send the blank pages too.

I explained my situation to an officer at my local Chase branch. "As someone who recently lost a job and thus a substantial portion of your income," she said, "you clearly qualify for Make Home Affordable. But you have to keep making your payments on time. Don't fall behind or you'll be disqualified."

Chase Home Finance's lists qualifications for MHA; I easily fulfilled them. I was excited. To make sure I didn't become the ten millionth American to lose his house since 2008, Chase would work to reduce my monthly payment. First, they would lengthen the repayment period. If that wasn't enough help, they'd cut my interest rate. They might even reduce the principal.

I carefully filled out the forms. I copied all the financial records they demanded. I mailed them off to a brand-new loan center in Colorado that, Chase promised, had been set up to expedite the processing of HFA applications. The package was more than 100 pages thick.

That was in January.

About a month later, Chase sent me a letter asking for the same exact documents I had already sent them. I was perplexed. The application was in the same package as the supporting papers. How could they know I wanted to apply for HFA, yet not have that stuff? They also asked for another bank statement--for the month that had passed between their receipt of my application and the date of their letter.

They did it over and over. They'd confirm receipt of an item, then demand it again. They asked for one particular month's bank record three times--after telling me that they'd gotten it twice.

Want a good laugh? Try navigating Chase's phone tree. It's at (866) 550-5705.

I called in March. Happy day! After submitting 318 pages of records, most of them redundant, my application was finally complete. An Actual Living Human would be in touch shortly to tell me whether I'd been approved and, if so, how much of a break I'd get. I also got a letter. Application complete! Application complete! What were all those pissed-off Chase Home Finance customers on the Internet whining about? All you had to do was be thorough. And persistent.

Alas, April brought more melancholia. Another letter: my application still wasn't complete again. Why hadn't I sent in the same documents I'd already sent in four times and had confirmed three times? And what about the bank statement that arrived between March and April?

I sent in the stuff along with a pissy cover note threatening to contact my Congressman if they didn't shape up.

So what happened? Democracy works! One week later, on May 18th, I received a rejection letter. The Reason: I had not suffered any loss of income.

"If it is determined that you are not eligible for a Home Affordable Modification," their website assures, "we'll evaluate you for other workout options to keep you in your home or advise you of other foreclosure alternatives." Never heard from them.

As a former banker, I wondered: How could they say that I hadn't taken a hit? Then it came to me. Chase only asks for records that show income: W-2s, pay stubs, income statements, bank statements. They don't look at your debt: credit cards, home equity lines of credit, other mortgages. Like most people whose income drops, my debts went up as I struggled to pay my bills. Indeed, I offered to send that stuff. They refused it!

At this time I would like to express my unvarnished admiration for the ruthless cynicism that led the executives at Chase Home Finance to conceive of a fake lending branch entirely dedicated to increasing foreclosures, improving their public image, and driving distressed homeowners crazy.

"The foreclosure-prevention program has had minimal impact," says John Taylor, chief executive of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. "It's sad that they didn't put the same amount of resources into helping families avoid foreclosure as they did helping banks."

I would also like to volunteer for the firing squad if and when these scumbags get what they deserve.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/08/26-0

Dhalgren
08-26-2010, 08:49 AM
It does the job and affords a bit of spectacle...

anaxarchos
08-26-2010, 09:04 AM
...effort to shut down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These two are probably the second most important of the surviving reforms from the New Deal. Fannie Mae, alongside some lesser programs, is probably the single largest reason why the percentage of home ownership is so high among American workers (and why they appear "wealthier" than others). It is responsible for both the secondary mortgage market and 30 year fixed loans. It's been whittled away over the decades with Freddie Mac created as private (but implicitly guaranteed) competition, Fannie itself being "privatized" by LBJ (to hide Vietnam War spending), and then the relaxation of regulations to allow them both to engage in derivatives speculation after the 1990s. In all of this, the Democrats have been the larger, although mostly invisible, criminals.

In 2008, both FMs got caught by the bursting bubble and the two were bailed out to the tune of a couple hundred billion dollars. Now, the Obama administration is using that reality to maneuver to shut down Fannie and Freddie and go to 100% privatization. Geitner and Summers are on record as saying "the government must get out of the housing business" and Barney Frank is pontificating on the same subject.

The irony is that some of the largest mortgage institutions are calling for the opposite - a return to 100% nationalization because the stump of the remaining real estate business will probably never return without that... certainly it will not return for working class housing.

While Social Security and Cat Food Commissions are drawing the attention, this is going on behind the scenes.

The truth is that it is hard to tell whether it is the crazy Republicans or the New Democrats who are MORE hostile to the New Deal.

http://www.prexton.com/images/homeownership_rate.gif
The increase from 1940 to 1960 is directly attributable to
Fannie which was created in 1938. The "roll-off" in the 1960s
is the product of "privatization". Now, the curve is headed
downward.

Kid of the Black Hole
08-26-2010, 12:44 PM
and now it is coming on full force. Hadn't considered it as one aspect of the "illusion" (veneer?) of American prosperity.

TBF
08-26-2010, 12:50 PM
I know they have been doing this on credit cards for years. They offer to help you, by the time you submit everything you are passed due, and then they all raise their rates. I think the goal is to charge you off (they must get a tax benefit from that) & then you go to collections hell. I am not sure if you ever get out of there because we are largely still in it (although none of the cards have been used in years). We have managed, with a diligent lawyer, to not have anything become a bankruptcy or court record. Damned if I know how you actually raise your credit score again though after all the nonsense, but I do know they continue to send you offers of more credit.

I am also in favor of firing squad.

anaxarchos
08-26-2010, 03:32 PM
http://www.prexton.com/images/stock_of_assets.jpg

The fuckers are beginning to cannabilze, not just "national assets", but their largest "markets" as well (Housing is about 15% of GDP across the "advanced" countries).

Kid of the Black Hole
08-27-2010, 10:48 AM
which I believe is around the same % as health care. At any rate, these guys aren't going for singes, they're calling their shot every at bat.

Supposedly even the Babe wasn't that cocksure, but I think there is a Zapruder film that documents it. In this case its definitey a snuff film.

Dhalgren
08-27-2010, 11:35 AM
had been hitting off a ball-tee. These guys aren't even being thrown to, they have no opposing team anymore - they are banging away at the softest, underhanded, lops...

Kid of the Black Hole
08-27-2010, 11:50 AM
and nobody threw a changeup back then and the Babe was a dead-red (no, not like that) fastball hitter.

Me, I throw a decent right..but the best thing I throw is tantrums.

(Oh and thanks for leaving "cocksure" alone, ha)