Log in

View Full Version : US: University presidents’ pay rises to record levels



chlamor
06-24-2009, 07:14 PM
US: University presidents’ pay rises to record levels
By Jeff Lassahn
24 November 2008

Salaries for university presidents rose by 7.6 percent from 2007 to 2008, according to an annual survey released by the Chronicle of Higher Education earlier this month. Much like their Wall Street counterparts, presidents of both public and private colleges and universities have enjoyed years of pay increases in sharp contrast to the deteriorating conditions of workers and students.

The latest data available from the College Board shows that tuition for public university students in the US increased by 6.3 percent from 2006 to 2007, another year in which tuition rose much faster than inflation. As the economic crisis intensifies, public universities nationwide are trimming workers’ wages and raising tuition, while top-earning presidents rake in millions.

David J. Sargent, president of Suffolk University in Boston, received $2.8 million in 2006-2007. The university decided to raise his salary after a “compensation expert” determined that his 2005-2006 salary of $416,971 was less than 75 percent of the national average, and that he was “woefully underpaid.” One wonders where the “compensation experts” are for analyzing the pay for part-time faculty, student, and service workers at universities.

The president of Northwestern University (Evanston, Illinois), Henry S. Bienen, took in $1,742,560; while Lee C. Bollinger, president of Columbia University in New York City, received $1,411,894. At public universities, David P. Roselle of the University of Delaware resigned in 2007 with a compensation package of $2.4 million. Ohio State University President E. Gordon Gee is the highest paid public university president, hauling in more than $1.3 million last year in salary. Twelve more public university presidents take in over $700,000 annually.

Other top university positions have also seen large pay raises, particularly those of head sports coaches. In 2007, a USA Today survey found that the average salary of football coaches at major colleges and universities surpassed $1 million for the first time. That year, more than 50 coaches made over $1 million; in 1999, only 5 coaches were paid that much. Top administrative positions also pay in the mid-six figures, after years of pay increases greater than inflation.

According to the report, public university presidents are “gaining ground” in compensation on their private counterparts. In 2007-2008, median pay and benefits rose 7.6 percent to $427,400. Both public and private presidents are also catching up with the compensation rates of corporate CEOs, especially with respect to their rates of salary increases irrespective of economic conditions.

In the wake of the release of the Chronicle’s report, some of the highest paid university presidents have stated they would “give back part of their pay or forgo their raises,” the New York Times reported Sunday. The majority of these givebacks, however, amount to token gestures in response to the public outcry in response to the publicity surrounding the issue, and do little to alter the reality of burgeoning university president pay.

For example, Amy Gutmann, president of the University of Pennsylvania, received $1,088,786 in 2006-2007—a 40 percent increase over the previous year. She is giving back $100,000—less than 25 percent of that raise—to fund undergraduate research. Elson S. Floyd, president of Washington State University, made $600,000 in his first year and got a $125,000 raise over the summer. He is volunteering to take a $100,000 cut in pay.

While pay for public university presidents has increased an astonishing 35.6 percent in the last five years, US Census Bureau figures show median US household income fell by $1,043 from 1999 through 2006, the last year for which figures are available. Labor Department statistics suggests that real wages have fallen a further 2.4 percent in the past year alone.

The pay of top college presidents also mimics corporate compensation in its vast disparity from the earnings of most employees at the school. The low wages of part-time teachers, food service, cleaning, transportation, and student workers at universities generally amount to only $3,000 to $30,000 a year. An average food service worker may take home only $10,000 a year, well below the official federal poverty line. At $427,400, the average salary of a public university president is nearly 43 times this amount, while the average income of a top private school president is a hundred times greater.

Increasingly, university educators find themselves at the bottom end of this enormous divide as colleges shift to part-time, adjunct faculty. The Chronicle notes that nearly 46 percent of college faculty nationwide was part-time in 2003, compared to just 22 percent in 1970. At community colleges, 67 percent of teaching staff were part-time, up from 27 percent in 1970. For equivalent work, they “are paid just over a fourth as much, per course, as their full-time counterparts.”

Nancy McMahon, a part-time English teacher at Madison Area Technical College, described to the Chronicle the effect this shift is having on the quality of education. “You find it very hard to put in the kind of time you would like to because you have to do other things to make a living,” she said. Factoring in all the preparation, office hours, grading, and class time, she said her income per course “comes out to minimum wage.”

While presidents’ salaries continue to soar, universities are being increasingly operated more like businesses than centers of learning. With part-time teachers earning a fraction of what tenure-track professors do, universities are making huge cuts in labor costs. With such low incomes, many adjunct faculty must teach at multiple schools, or work at other jobs. They are also generally excluded from healthcare, pensions, or any regular system of advancement.

Conditions at Virginia Commonwealth University

These trends in presidential pay, conditions of the workforce, and quality of education are shown clearly at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia. The largest public university in the state of Virginia, with 32,284 students, VCU is facing a 5 percent budget cut, owing to a $3.2 billion shortfall in the state budget.

The teaching staff consists of 1,888 faculty, 1,101 adjunct faculty, 805 graduate teaching assistants, and several dozen undergraduate student teachers and aides. More than half of the teaching staff are part-time. VCU states that the “adjunct faculty are qualified individuals hired for limited or special assignments to teach particular courses or sections. Adjunct faculty members are often employed on a single semester or summer session basis, with no formal expectation of continuation.” In other words, more than a third of the teaching staff have absolutely no job security or established rights for advancement.

Undergraduates at VCU are employed as teachers as well, with some earning as little as $9 an hour. Teaching two classes, three times a week, for a semester (15 weeks), such a teacher earns only about $2,400. To put this pay rate into perspective, tuition for VCU students is $3,100 a semester for in-state students. For out-of-state students it is $9,370 a semester, a 6.3 percent increase over the previous semester. Adding in rent, living expenses, books, supplies, and transportation, an undergraduate part-time teacher’s income amounts to only a fraction of expenses.

By contrast, the outgoing president of VCU, Eugene P. Trani, made $587,786 in 2007-2008, up from $537,622 the year before. In 2004, he made $383,000. The university also provides the president with a residence and car. University departments, meanwhile, in an effort to avoid cutting wages and salaries are cutting back to the bare essentials, by sharply curtailing spending on travel, teaching supplies, printing, and other expenses.

But while departments cut back, the salaries of many university and college presidents are supplemented by their corporate connections. One third of college presidents serve as directors on company boards, an example of the close ties between universities and big business. E. Gordon Gee, in addition to the $1.3 million he took in as the top-paid public university president, received $604,000 as a director of four major companies: Massey Energy, Limited Brands, Hasbro, and Gaylord Entertainment.

According to Forbes.com, VCU President Trani made roughly $330,000 last year sitting on the boards of Universal Corp. and LandAmerica Financial Corp. Universal Corp., based in Richmond, Virginia, is the world’s largest buyer and processor of leaf tobacco in nearly 40 countries around the world. VCU medical center sits just blocks from the headquarters of Philip Morris, Universal’s largest customer.

In the spring of 2008, the New York Times uncovered a secret research agreement between VCU and Philip Morris: “The contract bars professors from publishing the results of their studies, or even talking about them, without Philip Morris’s permission. If ‘a third party,’ including news organizations, asks about the agreement, university officials have to decline to comment and tell the company. Nearly all patent and other intellectual property rights go to the company, not the university or its professors.”

This increasingly business-like environment and such pro-corporate dealings are likely only to worsen as state and private funding to universities is sharply cut.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/nov2008/pres-n24.shtml

Lydia Leftcoast
06-24-2009, 07:29 PM
on both the K-12 and college levels.

The three elementary schools I attended in the1950s got along with a teacher or two for each grade, one principal, the principal's secretary, and a janitor or two. Now every public school seems to have "curriculum specialists," whose job it is to tell the teachers how to teach, and lord knows what else. Look at the Help Wanted Teachers section of your local newspaper. I challenge you to figure out what those job titles (other than such time-honored categories as "first grade teacher," "high school math teacher," and "football coach") actually mean and what the people attached to them actually do.

On the college level, I attended a four-year college that had professors, a business office that employed maybe 20 people, a president, an alumni director, a dean of men, a dean of women, and an academic dean who was half-time and taught philosophy the rest of the day.

When I came back to that college as an instructor ten years after graduation, the deans and the comptroller had all been promoted to vice-president with salaries twice that of any professor. There was a director of this and a director of that, all with high salaries. I know this, because I was just a part-time adjunct, and my great-aunt, who worked in the business office, got me hired on as a temp in the summer to help the college transition to a new employee health plan. I learned exactly how much everyone made. Most of the administrators made $10,000 more a year than any professor (in 1982), including the most long-standing and eminent ones.

It's only gotten worse. Look at the employment site of a major university or even a small college.

BitterLittleFlower
06-26-2009, 06:40 AM
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/02/19/kovel

read between the lines...


Anti-Israel Prof Loses Post at Bard
February 19, 2009
Share This Story

* Bookmark and Share
* E-mail
* Print

Related Stories

* No Charges, No End in E-Mail Fight
June 25, 2009
* Moving Past the Notre Dame Furor
June 22, 2009
* The (Pro)-White Professor
June 17, 2009
* AAUP Censures 4 Colleges
June 15, 2009
* A Crisis of Ethic Proportion
June 12, 2009

FREE Daily News Alerts
Advertisement

Joel Kovel -- one of the more outspoken professorial critics of Israel on American college campuses -- is out of his job at Bard College. This week Kovel sent a letter to all Bard faculty members denouncing the way he has been treated and charging that his politics cost him the position.

Others suggest, however, that Kovel was treated the way many non-tenured professors are being treated these days as colleges retrench -- and that mixed student reviews of his organizational skills in the classroom may have hurt him more than his politics.

And while the college is generally avoiding comment, some at Bard are angry at Kovel's accusations that appear to link Israel's treatment of Gaza with the college's treatment of him.

His faculty letter concluded this way: "If the world stands outraged at Israeli aggression in Gaza, it should also be outraged at institutions in the United States that grant Israel impunity. In my view, Bard College is one such institution. It has suppressed critical engagement with Israel and Zionism, and therefore has enabled abuses such as have occurred and are occurring in Gaza. This notion is of course, not just descriptive of a place like Bard. It is also the context within which the critic of such a place and the Zionist ideology it enables becomes marginalized, and then removed."

Kovel stands out among academic critics of Israel in that he does not just criticize actions of the government there, or advocate for a Palestinian state, but argues for the replacement of Israel with a secular state for Israelis and Palestinians. In interviews, he has called Israel an "abomination" and said that he understands "the desire to smash Zionism." His book Overcoming Zionism set off a controversy last year when its American distributor -- the University of Michigan Press -- temporarily halted sales, and then ended its relationship with Pluto Press, the publisher.

In his letter, Kovel argues that his position at Bard deteriorated as his opposition to Zionism grew and became more public. He cites his various public statements as well as the links of Bard's president, Leon Botstein, to Israel. Botstein is musical director of the Jerusalem Symphony Orchestra, and Kovel's letter cites as problematic a visit by the orchestra to Bard's campus in which the national anthems of the United States and Israel were played. (While Bard does have ties to Israel, it notably has ties to Palestinian higher ed that may be deeper than those of most institutions, just this week announcing a series of joint programs with Al Quds University.)

A Bard spokesman declined to comment on the situation, citing the confidentiality of personnel actions. But an evaluation of Kovel, which he released, suggests that his "long and productive career" at Bard has been problematic of late. The evaluation notes an increasing number of student complaints about Kovel's lack of organization, which he has previously explained by saying that he likes his courses to focus on current material.

The concerns expressed in the evaluation focus on these issues, although the review also notes that Kovel has been teaching a course about his book Overcoming Zionism, despite some qualms from faculty colleagues. "It is possible that the pitch of controversy in regard to Zionism has impeded dialogue in this case. ..." the evaluation says. (Kovel says that the evaluation was biased because one of the three professors involved is a supporter of Israel.)

Kovel has taught at Bard since 1988, first holding the Alger Hiss Chair of Social Studies, and later moving to a part-time professorship. He never had tenure, only renewable contracts, the last one of which will not be renewed. (He will receive emeritus status, however.)

While Bard officials did not respond to inquiries, President Botstein did send Kovel a letter that included in it permission to release it, which Kovel did at this reporter's request. In the letter Botstein notes that Bard is eliminating a number of part-time positions to try to preserve full-time professorships, and that -- had finances remained "flush" -- Kovel's contract probably would have been renewed.

"To take what is self-evidently a result of economic constraint and turn it into a trumped-up case of prejudice and political victimization insults not only your intelligence but the intelligence of your readers," Botstein writes. He goes on to thank Kovel for teaching at Bard and to say that he was never offended by having someone with his views on the faculty. "I am delighted that you hold views that many consider wrong or dangerous. You are not as controversial as you would like to believe."

And Botstein notes that he is proud that Bard is working with help improve Palestinian education through the Al Quds University effort, writing: "I’m sure that over the years ahead Bard will do much good on behalf of education and justice in the Middle East. Parenthetically, may I express my disappointment that you never inquired about this new program, which was announced to the faculty last spring."
— Scott Jaschik
Go to comments (38) »

On edit: The comments are really worth reading, this one I selected for a friend here:

" Joel Kovel is much more than the one dimensional character being lambasted here by the anti-freedom of speech brigade. His ‘The Enemy of Nature” book is perhaps the finest laying out of the basics of integrating ecological thinking into the bed rock of Marxism. Indeed, while many of the arguments of his work on Zionism have been voiced before, some of the work on eco-socialism is really breaking new ground and will, I hope, have a much wider and longer lasting impact. To remove such an innovative thinker under a ‘cost cutting’ measure what ever the real reason has robbed Bard of a real innovator, just at a time when more radical and wide ranging measures to deal with the environmental crisis alongside world social justice issues. Luckily people don’t go silent just because they get canned, but it does helps pay the bills."

blindpig
06-27-2009, 06:52 AM
http://www.joelkovel.org/joelkovel.html

http://www.newsocialist.org/index.php?id=1321