Mairead
01-20-2007, 10:54 AM
I think we could bear to have a shared understanding (not "rules" as such) about how to do or not do productive discussion.
The heuristics that make sense to me are
Be respectful of persons in an essential way, which is quite often not the same as being polite to them.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Argue clearly and with support, patiently continuing to explain as needed.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Openly acknowledge strong arguments made by others.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Accept the need to change your views when the evidence is against you.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
When the issue is a zero-sum one (e.g. do we do A or B), base your choice on generally accepted principle, not mere will or desire. Accept the validity, though not necessarily superiority, of principles chosen by others.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Never be chivvied into keeping quiet, unless to continue is obviously useless (as for example when dealing with a troll or fanatic).[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Comments? Additions? Amendations? Subtractions? Anything?
The heuristics that make sense to me are
Be respectful of persons in an essential way, which is quite often not the same as being polite to them.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Argue clearly and with support, patiently continuing to explain as needed.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Openly acknowledge strong arguments made by others.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Accept the need to change your views when the evidence is against you.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
When the issue is a zero-sum one (e.g. do we do A or B), base your choice on generally accepted principle, not mere will or desire. Accept the validity, though not necessarily superiority, of principles chosen by others.[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Never be chivvied into keeping quiet, unless to continue is obviously useless (as for example when dealing with a troll or fanatic).[/*:m:2mkvilbo]
Comments? Additions? Amendations? Subtractions? Anything?