Log in

View Full Version : Arctic Oil and Gas Rush Alarms Scientists



leftchick
09-12-2008, 10:08 AM
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43826


By Stephen Leahy

UXBRIDGE, Canada, Sep 8 (IPS) - As greenhouse gas pollution destroys Arctic ecosystems, countries like Canada are spending millions not to halt the destruction but to exploit it.

Late last August, Canada announced a 93.7-million-dollar prospecting programme to map the energy and mineral resources of the region. There are "countless other precious resources buried under the sea ice and tundra," Prime Minister Stephen Harper said during the announcement. The government's mapping effort is expected to trigger 469 million dollars in private sector resource exploration and development.

"It is estimated that a quarter of the world's undiscovered oil and gas lies under the Arctic," Harper said.

This scramble to exploit some of the most environmentally delicate regions of Earth has alarmed international experts who are meeting this week in Iceland to make recommendations to the United Nations and world governments on how to protect the polar regions.

"Many experts believe this new rush to the polar regions is not manageable within existing international law," says A.H. Zakri, director of the United Nations University's Yokohama-based Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS), co-organisers of the conference with Iceland's University of Akureyri.

"Pressure on Earth's unique and highly vulnerable polar areas is mounting quickly and an internationally-agreed set of rules built on new realities appears needed to many observers," Zakri said in a statement.

In Iceland, leading scholars will detail fast-emerging issues in international law and policy in the polar regions caused by such developments as the opening up of the Northwest Passage. They will identify priorities for law-making and research and offer their best advice to governments about what they should be doing now and in the future, said conference chair David Leary of UNU-IAS.

"Climate change is the number one issue for the polar regions. Iceland experienced its hottest day in history this summer," Leary told IPS from Akureyri in northern Iceland. "I expect some strong recommendations on climate change to come from this meeting."

As climate change opens the Arctic Ocean to shipping, fishing, and other resource exploitation, pollution will pose another major threat to the region, he said.

"Arctic sea routes are among the world's most hazardous due to lack of natural light, extreme cold, moving ice floes, high wind and low visibility," said Tatiana Saksina of the World Wildlife Fund's International Arctic Programme.

The Arctic marine environment is particularly susceptible to the effects of pollution and cleaning up oil spills would be extremely difficult if not impossible. "Yet there are no internationally binding rules to regulate operational pollution from offshore installations," Saksina said in a statement. "Strict standards for the transportation of Arctic oil are also urgently needed."

Saksina also noted that overfishing, often illegal and unreported, is already occurring in the Okhotsk and Bering Seas.

Ships also bring foreign species in their ballast waters. These "invaders" can push native species into extinction and fundamentally alter aquatic ecosystems, and have done so in many parts of the world. Arctic waters are particularly vulnerable and therefore very strict standards for ballast water exchange will be needed, said Leary.

Internationally-binding standards for construction, design, equipment and manning of ships are needed since many tourist ships plying the Arctic and Antarctic are not ice ships, he says. Tourism is driving up the number of ships visiting both poles -- the once-remote Antarctic region now sees more than 40,000 tourists every year.

"Accidents are going to happen. How will an oil spill be cleaned up? Who will rescue crew and passengers?" asked Leary.

davidgmills
09-13-2008, 05:39 PM
I have begun to change my tune on anthropogenic global warming. Once I was a devout believer, but in the last nine months, I have begun to discover lots of evidence that the "consensus" is pretty much bogus. Many highly intelligent scientists in the field of climatology and solar physics have come to the forefront in the last year and made strong cases that the global warming of the 20th century was not man made.

It is beginning to look like Sarah Palin is right on this one issue, although I am sure she is clueless as to why she might be right.

The sun has quit making sunspots like it did the last century when it made more sunspots than any time in the last 8000 years. And when the sun makes no sunspots its magnetic field that protects the earth from cosmic radiation shrinks by about 20% and when the sun makes no sunspots it's ultra-violet output changes 100 times as compared to when it is making it is making sunspots.

The last time the sun went 70 years without making many sunspots we had a mini-ice age between 1645 and 1715.

More and more it is look like the sun is the culprit for climate change. It is time the progressives and liberals took note of what scientists are saying before we look very foolish in the coming years. If sunspot production or non-production is the primary basis of climate change, and if as some scientists predict, the sun is going into another phase of no sunspots, polar bears will have plenty of ice, and ships won't be taking a polar route.

The hottest year on record was 1998. We haven't matched it since. And this August -- the 39th warmest on record.

See:

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/noaa-august-2008-is-22nd-warmest-on-record/#more-2944

The wattsupwitthat website is quickly becoming the premiere climate change website.

You should check it out.

starmaker
09-13-2008, 07:04 PM
"not manageable within existing international law"
"set of rules built on new realities "
"priorities for law-making and research and offer their best advice to governments"
"I expect some strong recommendations on climate change to come from this meeting."
"internationally binding rules to regulate"

UNU-IAS -a global think tank for the UN and it's agencies

Any solutions should be questioned along with AGENDA 21 AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

sweetheart
09-14-2008, 04:27 PM
I had the most real lucid dream of seeing the flash of nuclear explosions
over the horizon to the north towards the north pole. (which i would see
given being on the north coast of scotland.) And I could see mushroom clouds
far away to the north in what seemed a pre-emptive war to strike all ballastic missle
submarines with nuclear preemptive strikes.

And in this dream, as the flesh was falling off my body in chunks, i had to carry
my dogs one by one who had died to the cliff and drop them in to the sea. It was
like my flesh was rotting on my body... not a very happy dream.

But the weird part was that the dream was so incredibly real that i don't doubt
that it will happen one day. So, i'll die of radiation sickness ... when in the 60's
of youth, i was sure i'd die vaporized from the nuclear flash of global thermonuclear
war.

Goddam, i'd love to be just a silly dreamer and not a prophetic force;
make me wrong humanity the fucking stupid race of slimey slugs,
show me you won't go nuclear over the last 1/3rd of the world's gas
buried under the big whitetop.

davidgmills
09-14-2008, 04:42 PM
And when the chill comes from no sunspots, stay warm in Scotland.

sweetheart
09-14-2008, 05:42 PM
Sgt. O'Neill: Bob, I got a bad feeling on this one, all right? I mean I got a bad feeling! I don't think I'm gonna make it outta here! D'ya understand what I'm sayin' to you?
Sgt. Barnes: Everybody gotta die some time, Red.

Dr. Deagle makes a valid point about how rainy climates can onset hundreds of feet of
snow pack in a few years if the temperatures drop and allow a reflective cover to stay
in place when life needs summer heat. If that happpens, either northern europe will
become a wasteland or i'll survive.