Log in

View Full Version : A Nation on the Brink: Mexico's July 5 Legislative Elections



Michael Collins
07-05-2009, 05:14 AM
A Nation on the Brink Mexico's
July 5 Legislative Elections

Part 2 of a three part series (Part 1)
Michael Collins and Kenneth Thomas
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0907/S00048.htm

Mexico approaches this election confronting the rise of a narcostate, growing economic chaos, social inequalities, citizen disenchantment--or worse



As Mexico approaches the July 5th mid-term elections, the nation confronts two critical problems. An expanding an increasingly violent "war on drugs" threatens to convert Mexico into a narcostate. This will lead to the inevitable compromise of the members of all political parties. An expanding economic crisis in the wake of NAFTA and the global financial situation, threatens private companies, the Central Bank, and government programs -- as well as the income and employment of most citizens. Rising social inequality and a workforce crisis mean that many, perhaps most, Mexicans live in conditions parallel to those of sub-Saharan Africa.

Disenchantment and dismay reign. The volatile political situation foreshadows a change in the air. Close to 80% of Mexicans voted in mid-term elections in the 90's. Tomorrow, turnout is expected to be less that 50%. An attempted "no confidence" vote on the government looms. Members of the various parties engage in what has been called "fratricide." And there is talk -- talk which hearkens back to the Revolution of 1910 -- that it's time for the people to ignore the major parties and take matters into their own hands.

choppedliver
07-05-2009, 08:31 AM
From your article (really interesting!)
the legalization of recreational drugs that fuel the war on drugs

How much traction do you think this idea from a PRD rep would get? I often think this would be the way to go...

Michael Collins
07-06-2009, 10:10 PM
From your article (really interesting!)
the legalization of recreational drugs that fuel the war on drugs

How much traction do you think this idea from a PRD rep would get? I often think this would be the way to go...


It's here, small amounts.


"The legislation was approved at the height of a swine flu outbreak that dominated the public's, and the world's, attention. Meeting at times behind closed doors, the lower and upper houses of Congress passed the bill in the last days of April. It now awaits Calderon's signature.

The bill says users caught with small amounts -- 5 grams of marijuana, 500 milligrams of cocaine -- clearly intended for "personal and immediate use" will not be criminally prosecuted. They will be told of available clinics, and encouraged to enter a rehabilitation program.

Up to 40 milligrams of methamphetamine, a synthetic and especially harmful drug, is permitted under the legislation, as is up to 50 milligrams of heroin.

In May 2006, then-President Vicente Fox, of the same right-wing party as Calderon, vetoed a similar bill that he initially had supported. He backed down only under pressure from the Bush administration, which complained that decriminalization for even small amounts could increase use."
http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-fg-mexico-decriminalize21-2009jun21,0,6336338.story


But that's not the problem. The problem is U.S. The main money drug transmitted through Mexico to the USA is cocaine - crack and its subrurban twin. If we legalized coke, the problem would go away. Not likely.

Here's the fascinating thing. Calderon, the prexy, said, something like 'we don't (ask for warrants), we act.' OK, so if you do that and end up in gun battles in the streets killing your own people, why don't you go to the homes of the drug lords, 8-10 big ones, and just haul them in. There was a joke going around about one of the drug lords who had a huge wedding. It was in all the papers but the police couldn't arrest him because they said they weren't sure that he was there;) So shoot up some citizens and look tough.

Calderon would have been popular hands down, period, winner for life (even though he's term limited) if he'd just picked up and put the drug lords in a deep dark hole. But that ... would ... end the drug trade and where would the rake off come from.

Amazing stuff but, heck, Bush started Iraq to cover his ass and pay off his friends.

choppedliver
07-06-2009, 10:41 PM
Thanks, would be nice if there were some honor at least, ... :-\