Log in

View Full Version : The Destabilization of Pakistan The Main Result of the "War on Terror"



seemslikeadream
06-01-2009, 09:01 AM
http://www.counterpunch.org/leupp05292009.html


The Main Result of the "War on Terror"
The Destabilization of Pakistan
By GARY LEUPP

So far the principle result of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan following the events of 9-11 has been the destabilization of Pakistan. That breakdown is peaking with the events in what AP calls the “Swat town” of Mingora---actually a city of 375,000 from which all but 20,000 have fled as government forces moved in, strafing it with gunships. We’re talking urban guerrilla warfare, house-to-house fighting, not on the Afghan border but 50 miles away in the Swat Valley. We’re talking about Pakistani troops fighting to reclaim the nearby Malam Jabba ski resort from the Tehreek-e-Taliban, who since last year have been using it as a training center and logistics base. We’re talking about two million people fleeing the fighting in the valley and 160,000 in government refugee camps.

And of course, “collateral damage”: As was reported in The News in Pakistan May 19:

Several persons, including women and children, were killed and a number of others sustained injuries when families fleeing the military operation in Swat’s Matta town were shelled while crossing a mountainous path to reach Karo Darra in Dir Upper on Monday, eyewitnesses and official sources said. Eyewitnesses, who escaped the attack or were able to reach Wari town of Dir Upper in injured condition, said they were targeted by gunship helicopters. However, police officials said they might have been hit by a stray shell. Local people said they saw some 12 to 14 bodies on a mountain on the Swat side but could not go near to retrieve them or help the injured for fear of another aerial attack.

What a nightmare scenario for Pakistan.

We’re talking about the Pakistani Army sometimes fighting over the last year to retake towns from Taliban forces in the Buner region of the North-West Frontier Province that are closer to the capital of Islamabad than the Afghan border. And while the Talibs apparently lack popular support, even among the Pashtuns (who are 15 % of the Pakistani population---26 million and 42% of the Afghan population---14 million) they have been able to inflict embarrassing defeats on the army.

Tehreek-i-Taliban leader Baitullah Mahsud, head of the militant forces in South Waziristan, established his credentials when his forces captured 300 Pakistani soldiers and traded them for about 30 imprisoned militants in the fall of 2007. Time and again the several (sometimes rival) “Taliban” forces, which did not exist before the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan created them, have forced the government to negotiate terms. Most recently in February Islamabad agreed to the implementation of the Sharia in the Swat Valley in exchange for peace. The Taliban broke the agreement in April, or so the story goes, and the army claims it’s killed 1,100 militants since.

But curiously as of Sunday it claimed to have killed only 10 Taliban, while boasting of seizing (according to AP) “a spot nicknamed ‘bloody intersection’ because militants routinely dumped the mutilated bodies of their victims there.” On Monday I read of another four dead militants but the Taliban announced through a spokesman that they would maintain “aides” in place in the city, cease fire, and advise civilians to return. It appears most have retreated to other towns, including Buner and Daggar where fighting goes on now. This they can do under cover of the masses of refugees of course.

soryang
06-01-2009, 10:47 AM
...ia that you can invade, and Balkanize Iraq or Pakistan and not adversely affect the world balance of power because, we the former United States of America, can occupy the portion left with the most oil and disregard the effects on neighboring great powers. This disregards traditional security interests such as N. Korea and the fact that some of our potential rivals can field much larger and more effective ground armies in central Asia. The fact that we are virtually insolvent as an economy doesn't help much either. It also disregards that China could readily defeat our forces on the mainland of Asia just as they are eating our lunch economically.

The explosion of the 20 kiloton device in Korea while Obama and Rockefeller ruminate about phony threats like the war on terror and cybersecurity shows the totally delusional aspect of security planned by war contractors and paranoid super elites afraid for their money. Those that think China is concerned about N.Korean brinkmanship don't know how the game is played. They wishfully imagine that Chinese elites aren't concerned about our rogue invasions elsewhere in Asia.