Log in

View Full Version : Ron Paul: The Austrians Were Right



Virgil
11-23-2008, 10:15 AM
http://www.house.gov/apps/list/speech/tx14_paul/statement_11_20_08.shtml
=============

Speeches And Statements

Statement of Congressman Ron Paul

United States House of Representatives

The Austrians Were Right

November 20, 2008



Madame Speaker, many Americans are hoping the new administration will solve the economic problems we face. That’s not likely to happen, because the economic advisors to the new President have no more understanding of how to get us out of this mess than previous administrations and Congresses understood how the crisis was brought about in the first place.

Except for a rare few, Members of Congress are unaware of Austrian Free Market economics. For the last 80 years, the legislative, judiciary and executive branches of our government have been totally influenced by Keynesian economics. If they had had any understanding of the Austrian economic explanation of the business cycle, they would have never permitted the dangerous bubbles that always lead to painful corrections.

Today, a major economic crisis is unfolding. New government programs are started daily, and future plans are being made for even more. All are based on the belief that we’re in this mess because free-market capitalism and sound money failed. The obsession is with more spending, bailouts of bad investments, more debt, and further dollar debasement. Many are saying we need an international answer to our problems with the establishment of a world central bank and a single fiat reserve currency. These suggestions are merely more of the same policies that created our mess and are doomed to fail.

At least 90% of the cause for the financial crisis can be laid at the doorstep of the Federal Reserve. It is the manipulation of credit, the money supply, and interest rates that caused the various bubbles to form. Congress added fuel to the fire by various programs and institutions like the Community Reinvestment Act, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FDIC, and HUD mandates, which were all backed up by aggressive court rulings.

The Fed has now doled out close to $2 trillion in subsidized loans to troubled banks and other financial institutions. The Federal Reserve and Treasury constantly brag about the need for “transparency” and “oversight,” but it’s all just talk — they want none of it. They want secrecy while the privileged are rescued at the expense of the middle class.

It is unimaginable that Congress could be so derelict in its duty. It does nothing but condone the arrogance of the Fed in its refusal to tell us where the $2 trillion has gone. All Members of Congress and all Americans should be outraged that conditions could deteriorate to this degree. It’s no wonder that a large and growing number of Americans are now demanding an end to the Fed.

The Federal Reserve created our problem, yet it manages to gain even more power in the socialization of the entire financial system. The whole bailout process this past year was characterized by no oversight, no limits, no concerns, no understanding, and no common sense.

Similar mistakes were made in the 1930s and ushered in the age of the New Deal, the Fair Deal, the Great Society and the supply-siders who convinced conservatives that deficits didn’t really matter after all, since they were anxious to finance a very expensive deficit-financed American empire.

All the programs since the Depression were meant to prevent recessions and depressions. Yet all that was done was to plant the seeds of the greatest financial bubble in all history. Because of this lack of understanding, the stage is now set for massive nationalization of the financial system and quite likely the means of production.

Although it is obvious that the Keynesians were all wrong and interventionism and central economic planning don’t work, whom are we listening to for advice on getting us out of this mess? Unfortunately, it’s the Keynesians, the socialists, and big-government proponents.

Who’s being ignored? The Austrian free-market economists—the very ones who predicted not only the Great Depression, but the calamity we’re dealing with today. If the crisis was predictable and is explainable, why did no one listen? It’s because too many politicians believed that a free lunch was possible and a new economic paradigm had arrived. But we’ve heard that one before--like the philosopher’s stone that could turn lead into gold. Prosperity without work is a dream of the ages.

Over and above this are those who understand that political power is controlled by those who control the money supply. Liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats came to believe, as they were taught in our universities, that deficits don’t matter and that Federal Reserve accommodation by monetizing debt is legitimate and never harmful. The truth is otherwise. Central economic planning is always harmful. Inflating the money supply and purposely devaluing the dollar is always painful and dangerous.

The policies of big-government proponents are running out of steam. Their policies have failed and will continue to fail. Merely doing more of what caused the crisis can hardly provide a solution.

The good news is that Austrian economists are gaining more acceptance every day and have a greater chance of influencing our future than they’ve had for a long time.

The basic problem is that proponents of big government require a central bank in order to surreptitiously pay bills without direct taxation. Printing needed money delays the payment. Raising taxes would reveal the true cost of big government, and the people would revolt. But the piper will be paid, and that’s what this crisis is all about.

There are limits. A country cannot forever depend on a central bank to keep the economy afloat and the currency functionable through constant acceleration of money supply growth. Eventually the laws of economics will overrule the politicians, the bureaucrats and the central bankers. The system will fail to respond unless the excess debt and mal-investment is liquidated. If it goes too far and the wild extravagance is not arrested, runaway inflation will result, and an entirely new currency will be required to restore growth and reasonable political stability.

The choice we face is ominous: We either accept world-wide authoritarian government holding together a flawed system, OR we restore the principles of the Constitution, limit government power, restore commodity money without a Federal Reserve system, reject world government, and promote the cause of peace by protecting liberty equally for all persons. Freedom is the answer.

Code_Name_D
11-23-2008, 11:49 AM
Madame Speaker, many Americans are hoping the new administration will solve the economic problems we face. That’s not likely to happen, because the economic advisors to the new President have no more understanding of how to get us out of this mess than previous administrations and Congresses understood how the crisis was brought about in the first place.

I agree

Except for a rare few, Members of Congress are unaware of Austrian Free Market economics. For the last 80 years, the legislative, judiciary and executive branches of our government have been totally influenced by Keynesian economics. If they had had any understanding of the Austrian economic explanation of the business cycle, they would have never permitted the dangerous bubbles that always lead to painful corrections.

When it comes to declarations of arrogance and ignorance, statements like the one above are hard to top. First of all, the free market ideology is the only thing that guides Congress these days, Republicans and Democrats. The economic crisis is a condemnation of free market ideologies.

But it doesn’t surprise me when they try to spin the table and try to pin this mess on Keynesian economics. The sad fact is that Libertarians are even more ignorant about economics than the neo-conservatives are.

Klatoo
11-23-2008, 01:27 PM
Surely you jest!

Virgil
11-23-2008, 03:55 PM
Paul is right when he says Congress doesn't know what Austrian Economics is, but who really does- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_Economics

Code_Name_D
11-23-2008, 04:39 PM
He turned out not to be any where near as bad as we thought. (Lessens for Obama detractors? Hmmm...) But that's for another thread.

Virgil
11-23-2008, 04:45 PM
You must not be keeping up with his critics. California has huge financial problem and he is as pro-corporate as you can get.

Today's SacBee article, "Schwarzenegger's frosty relationship with GOP lawmakers adds to budget battle," with 27 comments - http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/1421094.html

Code_Name_D
11-23-2008, 05:02 PM
I agree that the Fed is a big part of the problem, but for very different reasons.

Paul is saying that the Federal Reserve is a problem because it’s a government program; typical libertarian anti-government speak. The real problem with the fed is the fact that it is the privatization of economic policy which is given specifically to Congress to set by the constitution.

They couldn’t whole sale sell of this power without being unconstitutional, so they created a qusi-government/privet entity known as the Federal Reserve. Doing away with the reserve would in theory revert these powers back to congress (who probably wouldn’t do any better of a job), something I suspect Libertarians oppose.

Klatoo
11-23-2008, 05:11 PM
Bad,Bad Arnold Man
Baddest Cat in the Whole Downtown
Badder than old King Kong
Meaner than a Junkyard Dog.

Code_Name_D
11-23-2008, 05:18 PM
I must admit that I am not all that well informed of California politics. Its enugh just keeping up here in Kansas.

Virgil
11-23-2008, 05:22 PM
You don't have to dig for Arni critics. They are right there on top. Acerbic is the word that comes to mind.