sunshinekathy
08-12-2008, 07:31 PM
Are the 2008 Election Swing States Susceptible to Outcome-determinative Vote Fraud?
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/2008Election/SwingStatesSusceptible2008.pdf
Please urge your U.S. Senator to vote "NO" on Senate bill 3212. This partial list of flaws in the new Bennett/Feinstein election reform bill S.3212 can be shared with your US Senator http://senate.gov who may be voting on it soon.
The Bennett/Feinstein Bill S.3212 – Worse than No Election Reform
http://electionarchive.org/ucvInfo/US/legislation/S3212BennettFeinsteinBill2008.pdf
Please forward this information. Thank you.
----
The 2008 presidential election swing states predominately use computer voting and tallying. The only reliable way to check if these computer counts actually reflect votes cast is to do post-election hand counts of secured voter-verified paper ballot records. Florida recently had a loss of over 100,000 computer votes and there have been numerous incidents where computers switched votes between candidates; this could be accidental malfunction or malicious. Not even the best experts can find information when it is not on computer memory - either erased or modified intentionally.
Twelve (12) out of thirteen (13) of the swing states are susceptible to undetected outcome-altering vote miscount because the election results are not subjected to independent post-election auditing that checks the accuracy of machine counts. Without routine measures to detect and correct errors, any system can be assumed to be inaccurate . Only three (3) swing states, NM, MO, and CO audit election results prior to certification, and two of these states, MO and CO, do insufficient or invalid, internal audits. Election laws and procedures and public accessibility to election records and data vary by state.
How susceptible are the swing states to vote fraud?
See this analysis:
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/2008Election/SwingStatesSusceptible2008.pdf
Without adequate independent audits , the only way to detect suspicious election results consistent with vote miscount would be for mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists with expertise in voting systems to work with attorneys and local election integrity activists to obtain election records and election data in each State immediately after the election. Then the statisticians, mathematicians, and independent voting system experts could look for patterns and evidence consistent with vote miscount. This collaborative work needs to be done prior to making any decision to concede any election outcome
Sincerely,
Kathy Dopp
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/2008Election/SwingStatesSusceptible2008.pdf
Please urge your U.S. Senator to vote "NO" on Senate bill 3212. This partial list of flaws in the new Bennett/Feinstein election reform bill S.3212 can be shared with your US Senator http://senate.gov who may be voting on it soon.
The Bennett/Feinstein Bill S.3212 – Worse than No Election Reform
http://electionarchive.org/ucvInfo/US/legislation/S3212BennettFeinsteinBill2008.pdf
Please forward this information. Thank you.
----
The 2008 presidential election swing states predominately use computer voting and tallying. The only reliable way to check if these computer counts actually reflect votes cast is to do post-election hand counts of secured voter-verified paper ballot records. Florida recently had a loss of over 100,000 computer votes and there have been numerous incidents where computers switched votes between candidates; this could be accidental malfunction or malicious. Not even the best experts can find information when it is not on computer memory - either erased or modified intentionally.
Twelve (12) out of thirteen (13) of the swing states are susceptible to undetected outcome-altering vote miscount because the election results are not subjected to independent post-election auditing that checks the accuracy of machine counts. Without routine measures to detect and correct errors, any system can be assumed to be inaccurate . Only three (3) swing states, NM, MO, and CO audit election results prior to certification, and two of these states, MO and CO, do insufficient or invalid, internal audits. Election laws and procedures and public accessibility to election records and data vary by state.
How susceptible are the swing states to vote fraud?
See this analysis:
http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/2008Election/SwingStatesSusceptible2008.pdf
Without adequate independent audits , the only way to detect suspicious election results consistent with vote miscount would be for mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists with expertise in voting systems to work with attorneys and local election integrity activists to obtain election records and election data in each State immediately after the election. Then the statisticians, mathematicians, and independent voting system experts could look for patterns and evidence consistent with vote miscount. This collaborative work needs to be done prior to making any decision to concede any election outcome
Sincerely,
Kathy Dopp