Log in

View Full Version : Betraying Progressives, DNC Platform Backs Fracking, TPP and Israel Occupation



In These Times
06-26-2016, 12:09 AM
This post first appeared at Common Dreams.
Despite its claims to want to unify voters ahead of November's election, the Democratic party appears to be pushing (http://usuncut.com/politics/sanders-dnc-platform-committee-fight/) for an agenda that critics say (https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/746733400736808960) ignores basic progressive policies, "staying true" to their Corporate donors above all else.
During a 9-hour meeting in St. Louis, Missouri on Friday, members of the DNC's platform drafting committee voted down (http://elections.ap.org/content/democrats-reject-platform-proposal-opposing-trade-deal) a number of measures proposed by Bernie Sanders surrogates (http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/05/23/seizing-chance-sanders-makes-bold-progressive-picks-shape-dnc-platform) that would have come out against the contentious Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP (http://www.commondreams.org/tag/tpp)), fracking, and the Israeli occupation of Palestine. At the same time, proposals to support a carbon tax, Single Payer healthcare, and a $15 minimum wage tied to inflation were also disregarded.
In a statement (https://berniesanders.com/press-release/clinton-delegates-vote-clinton-stands-trade/), Sanders said he was "disappointed and dismayed" that representatives of Hillary Clinton and DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schulz rejected the proposal on trade put forth by Sanders appointee Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), despite the fact that the presumed nominee has herself come out against (http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/10/07/flipping-tpp-hillary-clinton-proves-chameleon-corporate-trade)the 12-nation deal.
"Inexplicable" was how Sanders described the move, adding: "It is hard for me to understand why Secretary Clinton’s delegates won’t stand behind Secretary Clinton’s positions in the party’s platform."
The panel also rejected amendments suggested by 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben, another Sanders pick, that would have imposed a carbon tax, declared a national moratorium on fracking as well as new fossil fuel drilling leases on federal lands and waters.
"This is not a political problem of the sort that we are used to dealing with," McKibben stated during the marathon debate. "Most political problems yield well to the formula that we’ve kept adopting on thing after thing—compromise, we’ll go halfway, we’ll get part of this done. That’s because most political problems are really between different groups of people. They’re between industry and environmentalists. That is not the case here."
"Former U.S. Representative Howard Berman, American Federation of State, County, and Muncipal Employees executive assistant to the president, Paul Booth, former White House Energy and Climate Change Policy director Carol Browner, Ohio State Representative Alicia Reece, former State Department official Wendy Sherman, and Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R713OylyhIg to prevent a moratorium from becoming a part of the platform," noted (https://shadowproof.com/2016/06/25/clinton-democrats-block-fracking-ban/) Shadowproof's Kevin Gosztola.
According to Gosztola's reporting on the exchange, Dr. Cornel West lambasted the aforementioned panel members, particularly Browner, for "endorsing reform incrementalism" in the face of an urgent planetary crisis.
"When you’re on the edge of the abyss or when you’re on that stove, to use the language of Malcolm X, you don’t use the language of incrementalism. It hurts, and the species is hurting," West said.
Other progressive policies were adopted piecemeal, such as the $15 minimum wage, which the committee accepted but without the amendment put forth by Ellison that would have indexed the wage to inflation.
The panel did vote unanimously to back a proposal to abolish the death penalty and adopted language calling for breaking up too-big-to-fail banks and enacting a modern-day Glass-Steagall Act—measures that Sanders said he was "pleased" about.
According (http://elections.ap.org/content/democrats-reject-platform-proposal-opposing-trade-deal) to AP, the final discussion "centered on the Israel-Palestinian conflict."
"The committee defeated an amendment by Sanders supporter James Zogby that would have called for providing Palestinians with 'an end to occupation and illegal settlements' and urged an international effort to rebuild Gaza," AP reports, measures which Zogby said Sanders helped craft.
Instead, AP reports, the adopted draft "advocates working toward a 'two-state solution of the Israel-Palestinian conflict' that guarantees Israel's security with recognized borders 'and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity.'"
Citing these "moral failures" of the platform draft, West abstained (https://twitter.com/RaniaKhalek/status/746576130879066113?ref_src=twsrc^tfw) during the final vote to send the document to review by the full Platform Committee next month in Orlando, Florida.
"If we can't say a word about TPP, if we can't talk about Medicare-for-All explicitly, if they greatest prophetic voice dealing with pending ecologically catastrophe can hardly win a vote, and if we can't even acknowledge occupation... it seems there is no way in good conscience I can say, 'Take it to the next stage,'" West declared before the assembly.
"I wasn't raised like that," he said. "I have to abstain. I have no other moral option, it would be a violation of my own limited sense of moral integrity and spiritual conscience," adding, "That's how I roll."


More... (http://inthesetimes.com/article/19247/betraying-progressives-dnc-platform-backs-fracking-tpp-and-israel-occupatio/)

Dhalgren
06-26-2016, 09:50 AM
“Inexplicable” was how Sanders described the move, adding: “It is hard for me to understand why Secretary Clinton’s delegates won’t stand behind Secretary Clinton’s positions in the party’s platform.”

Sanders is either stupid or lying, again. What Clinton says in the campaign means nothing; what her minions do in committee means everything. Now, the Democrats do not have to follow their platform - they rarely have - but it does announce what they want everyone to take as their policy stands. It seems clear that the Clinton campaign is angling for Republicans who can't stand Trump. Progressives and faux-leftists can either vote for Clinton or go fuck themselves. Clinton's strategy appears to be that if she can corral enough runaway Republicans, join them with her own right-wing Democrats, and then add in as many loser progressives from the cheap seats, she'll have it all sewed-up. She is probably right. "Progressive liberals" are trained dogs, they do what they're told, roll-over, and do it again. I heard that the Green Party nominee, Jill Stein, has offered Sanders the VP slot on the Green ticket, but Sanders is lining up for his payday and won't bite that hand.

I read where the Sandernistas feel that the Democratic Platform is a slap in their faces. Maybe they ain't as stupid as I thought.

blindpig
06-26-2016, 11:36 AM
I read where the Sandernistas feel that the Democratic Platform is a slap in their faces. Maybe they ain't as stupid as I thought.

Let's just see how many ask for another.
It would be a good thing if the malcontents show-out at the convention, though I'm sure Bernie & Hilary are doing everything possible to keep democracy from breaking out.