Log in

View Full Version : Rescue for the Few, Debt Slavery for the Many by Michael Hudson



Virgil
10-13-2008, 09:20 AM
I regard this as a cream of the crop article on the cementing of the financial oligarchy to permanently rule over us or what some may call the financial or economic crisis. Out of all the forums to chose from, the reason this is presented in A&E is because 1) in a world where everyone should be looking for the people worth listening to Michael Hudson proves his voice with this piece, and 2) it is spectacular in its clarity, composition, scope, and understanding. If there were a cream of the crop thread in the Economics Forum this could well serve as the standard to judge all others by. In a country of plantation minds with all those diseased by televisionism and its addiction, this is remedy.

It defeats the stupid shit of Obama as a champion of populism, that government represents the general welfare and that we do have RwR, and that the Dims have plenty of backbone as shown with the raid on the treasury that will rob the old of their SS and purchasing power of their lifetime savings and the young that will pay the interest on this robbery. We see the criminals walking away, the best path being crapped and pissed on, and the criminal rule of the country.

When I say that government is criminal enterprise, this article is evidence enough even if you never thought on the usurpation of power by Warshington that created a hegemonic power over every aspect of our lives with their creation of things like unitary presidency and signing statements and the various protection rackets.

I regard the statement that "Obama does not have blood on his hands" as one of the most idiotic things recently said on this board, much in comparison to the statement driven from the wrong statement driven from the board that ignored RwR that said the Dims problem is spinelessness. The "solution" of Congress brings with it misery and blood, blood that will increasingly come by means of suicide. Money can be equal to life, although it might be more clearly expressed to say money is like oxygen where its deficiency can lead to death.

We have open gangsterism in Congress. Here is evidence. We absolutely need to learn our lesson. Here we have a pill for Plantation Mind. There are lesson in this article and it is worth sending to your friends. It would be nice to see a demonstration of threadbuilding around this article on any messageboard. I will look around later to see where this article appears on the Internet so that we might see how the web is doing on carrying the pills of excellence we need in fixing our Plantation Minds.

http://counterpunch.org/hudson10132008.html
===============

October 13, 2008
Congress Should Bail Out of the Bailout
Rescue for the Few, Debt Slavery for the Many

By MICHAEL HUDSON

We are now entering the financial End Time. Bailout “Plan A” (buy the junk mortgages) has failed, “Plan B” (buy ersatz stocks in the banks to recapitalize them without wiping out current mismanagers) is fizzling, and the debts still can’t be paid. That is the reality Wall Street avoids confronting. “First they ignore you, then they denounce you, and then they say that they knew what you were saying all the time,” said Gandhi. The same might be said of today’s overhang of debts in excess of the economy’s ability to pay. First the policy makers pretend that they can be paid, then they denounce the pessimists as spreading panic, and then they say that of course students have been taught for four thousand years now how the “magic of compound interest” keeps on doubling and redoubling debts faster than the economy can squeeze out an economic surplus to pay.

What has ended is the idea that “the magic of compound interest” can make economies rich without having to work and without industry. I hope we have seen the end of derivatives formulae seeking to make money by playing in a zero-sum game. A debt overhang always ends either in foreclosure of the debtor’s property, or in a debt annulment to preserve the economy’s overall freedom and equity.

This means that the postmodern economy as we know it must end – either in financial polarization and debt peonage to a new oligarchic elite, or in a debt cancellation, a Jubilee Year to rescue society. But when the government says that it is reviewing “all” the options, this reality is not one of them. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s first option was to buy packages of junk mortgages (collateralized debt obligations, CDOs) to save the wealthiest institutional investors from having to take a loss on their bad bets. When this was not enough, he came up with “Plan B,” to give money to banks. But whereas Britain and European countries talked of nationalizing banks or at least taking a controlling interest, Mr. Paulson gave in to his Wall Street cronies and promised that the government’s stock purchases would not be real. There would be no dilution of existing shareholders, and the government’s investment would be non-voting. To cap the giveaway to his cronies, Mr. Paulson even agreed not to ask executives to give up their golden parachutes, exorbitant annual bonuses or salaries.

Plan A (the $700 billion to buy mortgage-backed junk that the private sector will not buy) failed partly because it let financial institutions avoid putting a fair value on the debt packages they were selling. Instead of telling the truth about their financial position by marking assets to market prices), they can “mark to model,” Enron-style. We have seen the result: A solid week of plunging stock market prices. The public media call this a panic, but there is nothing irrational about it. Who in their right mind would buy securities or buy into a bank without knowing what the securities were worth? Faith in junk mathematical models has ended.

So we still await a public response to the problem of how to write down debts. Whose economic interest will have to give: that of debtors, as increasingly has been the case over the past eight centuries; or that of creditors, which have fought back to create a neoliberal economy controlled by the FIRE sector?

It is not too late to decide which road to take, but Wall Street bankers and creditors have taken the lead in positioning themselves. Seeing which way the political winds were blowing, they moved to empty out the Treasury before the November 3 elections much like medieval citizens fleeing a horde of Mongolian raiders under Genghis Khan. “We’re moving. Clean out the cupboards,” much as Lehman Brothers emptied out their foreign bank accounts in Britain and elsewhere just before declaring bankruptcy, taking what they could and steering it to their best friends.

The pretense was that a bailout was needed to restore confidence. But the ensuing week showed that the claims were false. It didn’t turn the stock market around as promised. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 2,200 points from Wednesday, October 1 through the following Friday October 10 – eight straight trading days, not even pausing for the usual zigzags. Friday’s plunge was 100 points a minute for the first seven minutes – a 690 point drop to under 8000. Each 100 points was more than a 1 percent drop, which was reflected on the NASDAQ. Nothing could withstand the pressure of so many Americans cashing in their mutual funds overnight and so many foreigners in earlier time zones putting in sell-at-market orders.

Short sellers made one of the largest and quickest fortunes ever, and then covered their positions by buying back the stocks they had pre-sold. This pushed prices up even into positive territory just before 10:30 AM when George Bush began to speak. Half the financial stocks showed gains – a sign that the Plunge Protection Team had jumped in. But Mr. Bush said nothing helpful and stocks went back into freefall, ending down another 128 points despite the upcoming weekend G7 meeting. There was no talk at all of reducing debt levels – only of giving more money to banks, insurance companies and other money managers, as if “pushing on a string” somehow would lead them to lend yet more to an already debt-ridden economy.

<snipped>

Virgil
10-31-2008, 05:20 AM
Gtaacfe- Giving the article another chance for eyeballs.