San Bernardino Incident Has the Earmarks of a False Flag. Testimony of Eyewitnesses

By Stephen Lendman
Global Research, December 11, 2015

2015 San Bernardino shooting map location of mass shooting, OpenStreetMap (CC BY-SA 2.5)
Justifiable suspicions about what happened surfaced straightaway after the incident.

The alleged perpetrators, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik, appear to have been used as convenient patsies – the same way April 2013 Boston Marathon bombing suspects Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Dzhokhar were unjustly framed for a crime they didn’t commit.

False flag attacks are used to stoke fear, to enlist public support for planned domestic and foreign horrors. Events post-9/11 are well-documented. What’s unfolding now looks like more of the same – the phony pretext of combating ISIS, state-sponsored high crimes at home and abroad.

Eyewitnesses to the San Bernardino shooting said three white gunmen in black military attire, armed with assault rifles, were responsible.

Sally Abdelmageed working at the Inland Regional Center described them this way, saying “(a)s soon as they opened up the doors to building three…one of them (began) shoot(ing) into the room.”

“I couldn’t see a face. He had a black hat on…black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side…long sleeve shirt…gloves…huge assault rifle…six magazines…I just saw three dressed exactly the same.”

“It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic(ally) buil(t), and they appeared to be tall” – clearly professionals, carrying out a well-planned attack, the way all false flags are conducted.

Abdelmageed and other eyewitnesses gave similar accounts, debunking the official narrative – a Big Lie, framing two innocent Muslim patsies, killed by police to tell no tales, given no chance to explain their innocence.

Their bodies were found handcuffed, indicating they were apprehended and likely extrajudicially executed to be unable to refute the official narrative.

Former NSA/CIA contractor Steven D. Kelley told Press TV intimated that hired guns allegedly from Craft International (a Blackwater type paramilitary group, the same one responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings) could have been behind the San Bernardino shootings. (see below)



The incident “is just one in a long string of false flag events that I am afraid to say are not over,” he said. “We’ll probably be seeing several more before the end of the year, because of the events that are going on in the world, specifically with NATO implicated in the buying of (stolen Iraqi and Syrian oil complicit with) Daesh and other events.”

“(W)hen these things happen, they need to have a rapid response which requires a false flag attack. This was very obvious that this was going to happen” – with lots more to come, Kelly believes, part of Washington’s well-orchestrated fear-mongering campaign.

The early stages of its dirty aftermath are playing out, most Americans mindless about how they’re being duped.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

The original source of this article is Global Research

http://www.globalresearch.ca/san-bernardino-incident-has-the-earmarks-of-a-false-flag-testimony-of-eyewitnesses/5495126

I post this with trepidation, not keen on Global Research, chem-trail country. But I was listening to the radio as this went down and the initial reports were as Ms Abelmageed states above.

We do not put anything past them, this is possible, but in no way conclusive. What the deal is with other witnesses I have no idea. There will be no trial as dead men and women tell no tales. So I guess we just take their word for it.....

I post this with trepidation, not keen on Global Research, chem-trail country. But I was listening to the radio as this went down and the initial reports were as Ms Abelmageed states above.

We do not put anything past them, this is possible, but in no way conclusive. What the deal is with other witnesses I have no idea. There will be no trial as dead men and women tell no tales. So I guess we just take their word for it.....

Agree with your "trepidation". However, the real "facts on the ground" may never be know - one way or the other. I think the thing to focus on is the response, without regard to who the "real" perps are. When the Christian nutter killed folks at the women's clinic, no breathless, pale-faced, palpitations were expressed to hide your kids and lock-up your women. Even the various shootings at all these movie houses, grammar schools, colleges, and post offices did not send the cits into the stratosphere. Even if the actual killings were not orchestrated, the response was. This far into our Brave New World/1984/capitalist dystopia, it is the response that is the important part, not the hapless sap set-up to take the fall or the terrorist master-mind behind it all.

Global Research is suspect, to be sure, but in this case it is the focus (mostly) that is misplaced. If the successive mass murders in this country, coming at an ever more frequent occurrence, are only one out of ten perpetrated by Muslim extremists, then why is that the most basic focus of attention? I have no way of knowing who is directly responsible for each, individual murderous event, but I do know what is ultimately responsible for them all.

Agree with your "trepidation". However, the real "facts on the ground" may never be know - one way or the other. I think the thing to focus on is the response, without regard to who the "real" perps are. When the Christian nutter killed folks at the women's clinic, no breathless, pale-faced, palpitations were expressed to hide your kids and lock-up your women. Even the various shootings at all these movie houses, grammar schools, colleges, and post offices did not send the cits into the stratosphere. Even if the actual killings were not orchestrated, the response was. This far into our Brave New World/1984/capitalist dystopia, it is the response that is the important part, not the hapless sap set-up to take the fall or the terrorist master-mind behind it all.

Global Research is suspect, to be sure, but in this case it is the focus (mostly) that is misplaced. If the successive mass murders in this country, coming at an ever more frequent occurrence, are only one out of ten perpetrated by Muslim extremists, then why is that the most basic focus of attention? I have no way of knowing who is directly responsible for each, individual murderous event, but I do know what is ultimately responsible for them all.

Exactly, "the response was". And it seems that most arrests made in so-call conspiracies involve some sort of 'set-up', as with that poor chump the FBI gunned down associated with the Boston Marathon bombing.

It doesn't seem to matter what happens, what matters is how it is presented. "Don't believe yer lyin' eyes darlin', trust me, I got footage." So post-modern.

It doesn't seem to matter what happens, what matters is how it is presented. "Don't believe yer lyin' eyes darlin', trust me, I got footage." So post-modern.

To me, this appears to be one of the biggest obstacles to advancing class consciousness. This management of current events, the orchestration of reaction and narrative appears overwhelming and makes putting forth realistic views of developments almost impossible.
I think that this is what drives Comrade to counter the imperialist narrative by hammering on the narrative of the opposition; and I completely understand this. But it is a losing battle. There are hundreds of millions of bloggers out there, trying to counter one or the other side of all of these narratives, with no centrality of effort.
The Trots try to have a central "source" for (what they call) a working class view, but theirs is pale, as well.
I think Anax wanted this site to act as a candle in the darkness, a wee voice that tears down all narratives to the underlying reality - all from and for the working class.

All that aside, approaching these issues from the "narrative" angle may be the best approach; we can dissect the responses and storylines where we are not able to get our hands on the forensics of the events, themselves.

To me, this appears to be one of the biggest obstacles to advancing class consciousness. This management of current events, the orchestration of reaction and narrative appears overwhelming and makes putting forth realistic views of developments almost impossible.
I think that this is what drives Comrade to counter the imperialist narrative by hammering on the narrative of the opposition; and I completely understand this. But it is a losing battle. There are hundreds of millions of bloggers out there, trying to counter one or the other side of all of these narratives, with no centrality of effort.
The Trots try to have a central "source" for (what they call) a working class view, but theirs is pale, as well.
I think Anax wanted this site to act as a candle in the darkness, a wee voice that tears down all narratives to the underlying reality - all from and for the working class.

All that aside, approaching these issues from the "narrative" angle may be the best approach; we can dissect the responses and storylines where we are not able to get our hands on the forensics of the events, themselves.

Might we say that for the first time since Guttenburg that information has been monopolized? Doesn't seem to matter that you can find damn near anything you want, if people won't even consider it then it might as well not be there. Fuckers don't have to suppress us, the potential audience does that for them. What matters in history is scale and as they own the electronic media, unlike what they portray as 'authoritarian propaganda' their's is not apparently the government and comes in multiple flavors: NPR for those who think they're smart, Fox for those who can't stand those who think they're smart, CNN for most the rest, Vice & Fusion for those who think they're cool. Curiously, for all of the superficial differences none of those outlets challenge the status quo in any serious way. Viva la difference!

The Long March might be an appropriate analogy for us.