Log in

View Full Version : How these gibbering numbskulls came to dominate Washington



sweetheart
10-27-2008, 09:49 PM
The degradation of intelligence and learning in American politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies

o George Monbiot
o Tuesday October 28 2008

How was it allowed to happen? How did politics in the US come to be dominated by people who make a virtue out of ignorance? Was it charity that has permitted mankind's closest living relative to spend two terms as president? How did Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle and other such gibbering numbskulls get to where they are? How could Republican rallies in 2008 be drowned out by screaming ignoramuses insisting that Barack Obama was a Muslim and a terrorist?

Like most people on my side of the Atlantic, I have for many years been mystified by American politics. The US has the world's best universities and attracts the world's finest minds. It dominates discoveries in science and medicine. Its wealth and power depend on the application of knowledge. Yet, uniquely among the developed nations (with the possible exception of Australia), learning is a grave political disadvantage.

There have been exceptions over the past century - Franklin Roosevelt, JF Kennedy and Bill Clinton tempered their intellectualism with the common touch and survived - but Adlai Stevenson, Al Gore and John Kerry were successfully tarred by their opponents as members of a cerebral elite (as if this were not a qualification for the presidency). Perhaps the defining moment in the collapse of intelligent politics was Ronald Reagan's response to Jimmy Carter during the 1980 presidential debate. Carter - stumbling a little, using long words - carefully enumerated the benefits of national health insurance. Reagan smiled and said: "There you go again." His own health programme would have appalled most Americans, had he explained it as carefully as Carter had done, but he had found a formula for avoiding tough political issues and making his opponents look like wonks.

It wasn't always like this. The founding fathers of the republic - Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton and others - were among the greatest thinkers of their age. They felt no need to make a secret of it. How did the project they launched degenerate into George W Bush and Sarah Palin?

On one level, this is easy to answer. Ignorant politicians are elected by ignorant people. US education, like the US health system, is notorious for its failures. In the most powerful nation on earth, one adult in five believes the sun revolves round the earth; only 26% accept that evolution takes place by means of natural selection; two-thirds of young adults are unable to find Iraq on a map; two-thirds of US voters cannot name the three branches of government; the maths skills of 15-year-olds in the US are ranked 24th out of the 29 countries of the OECD. But this merely extends the mystery: how did so many US citizens become so stupid, and so suspicious of intelligence? Susan Jacoby's book The Age of American Unreason provides the fullest explanation I have read so far. She shows that the degradation of US politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/oct/28/us-education-election-obama-bush-mccain

PraxMan
10-28-2008, 07:38 AM
Don't get me wrong, George...I love your writings and believe you're are one of the premiere environmental advocates on the planet.

But those "gibbering numbskulls" in the Republican party had NO PROBLEM fooling British Labour?

So what happened to YOUR fine universities, eh? Was Tony and Cherie's New Age guru a high watermark in British politics? How exactly did the British education system immune the British to such "gibbering" as "Saddam has nukes and it's headed right for us, Batman!"?

Now as far as the "collapse of intelligent politics", wasn't Maggie Thatcher (mother to former Equatorial Guinea King wannabe Mark!) who scored big popularity points with such intellectual bon bons as, "I don't mind how much my Ministers talk, so long as they do what I say." or "I owe nothing to Women's Lib."

Please George -- the actual decision-making to murder, pillage, torture and empire is not being done by toothless rubes living in trailer parks, but by very rich, very educated people with absolutely no capacity with regard to either their own 'lower classes' or the 'environment' as nothing more than sacrifices in a chess match.

Leave the public out of it, dude. The elites always do -- so why suggest the 'little people' or the 'unwashed' have a role other than fodder?

here's a suggestion, George... psst! It's a oligarchical class-based police state so being smart is actually a negative. Maybe a bright fellow like you could, instead of calling the public stupid, you should go and talk to the smart people running their societies into the ground, dumbass