Allen17
10-11-2013, 05:58 PM
Caitlin C. Rosenthal didn’t intend to write a book about slavery. She set out to tackle something much more mundane: the history of business practices. But when she started researching account books from the mid-1800s, a period of major economic development during the rise of industrialization in the United States, Rosenthal stumbled across an unexpected source of innovation.
Rosenthal, a Harvard-Newcomen Fellow in business history at Harvard Business School, found that southern plantation owners kept complex and meticulous records, measuring the productivity of their slaves and carefully monitoring their profits—often using even more sophisticated methods than manufacturers in the North. Several of the slave owners’ practices, such as incentivizing workers (in this case, to get them to pick more cotton) and depreciating their worth through the years, are widely used in business management today.
The evolution of modern management is usually associated with good old-fashioned intelligence and ingenuity—”a glorious parade of inventions that goes from textile looms to the computer,” Rosenthal says. But in reality, it’s much messier than that. Capitalism is not just about the free market; it was also built on the backs of slaves who were literally the opposite of free.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2013/01/16/the-messy-link-between-slave-owners-and-modern-management/
Yet they still didn't connect the dots, really....if the history of capitalism is deeply tied to the history of slavery (as well as violence, piracy, and systemic social oppression), and if standard capitalist practices are based on that brutal, inhumane history...well, then what the fuck are we waiting for? Why are so many people not willing to make the next step, logically?
Slavery, piracy, violence, social oppression and deprivation...these things are fundamental to capitalism's development. Can't regulate something so brutal, so ruthless, so inhumane....
Rosenthal, a Harvard-Newcomen Fellow in business history at Harvard Business School, found that southern plantation owners kept complex and meticulous records, measuring the productivity of their slaves and carefully monitoring their profits—often using even more sophisticated methods than manufacturers in the North. Several of the slave owners’ practices, such as incentivizing workers (in this case, to get them to pick more cotton) and depreciating their worth through the years, are widely used in business management today.
The evolution of modern management is usually associated with good old-fashioned intelligence and ingenuity—”a glorious parade of inventions that goes from textile looms to the computer,” Rosenthal says. But in reality, it’s much messier than that. Capitalism is not just about the free market; it was also built on the backs of slaves who were literally the opposite of free.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/hbsworkingknowledge/2013/01/16/the-messy-link-between-slave-owners-and-modern-management/
Yet they still didn't connect the dots, really....if the history of capitalism is deeply tied to the history of slavery (as well as violence, piracy, and systemic social oppression), and if standard capitalist practices are based on that brutal, inhumane history...well, then what the fuck are we waiting for? Why are so many people not willing to make the next step, logically?
Slavery, piracy, violence, social oppression and deprivation...these things are fundamental to capitalism's development. Can't regulate something so brutal, so ruthless, so inhumane....