Log in

View Full Version : Detroit mayoral candidate D’Artagnan Collier "How I became a socialist"



Tinoire
07-31-2009, 09:11 PM
Interview with SEP Detroit mayoral candidate D’Artagnan Collier
How I became a socialist

By Nancy Hanover
31 July 2009

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j24-dart-288.jpg
D’Artagnan Collier

D’Artagnan Collier, the Socialist Equality Party’s candidate for mayor of Detroit, has deep roots in the city’s working class population and its struggles. Collier, 41, a city worker and lifelong resident of Detroit, joined the socialist movement in 1984.

His maternal grandfather, James Andrew Davis, migrated to the Motor City from Meridian, Mississippi after World War II, one of tens of thousands of African-American workers who left the poverty and racial oppression of the Deep South in search of a better life in Detroit’s many auto factories. Davis worked at Chrysler for 33 years, the majority of those years at the auto company’s massive Dodge Main complex on the city’s east side. He died at the age of 79 from neuropathy—a degeneration of the central nervous system caused by long-term exposure to lead.

D’Artagnan’s father—Malcolm J. Collier—was a materials handler at Chrysler’s Detroit Trim factory. He had grown up in the Jeffries Housing Projects, but his job at an auto plant enabled him to buy a house on the city’s northeast side, marry Diana Gail Davis, and start a family.

D’Artagnan, the first of three boys, was born in July 1968. Many in the family were avid readers and his parents decided to name their child D’Artagnan, after one of the heroic characters in Alexandre Dumas’ The Three Musketeers (1844). In fact, all three boys would have French or Spanish names.

His parents separated while he was very young, and his mother, a life-long caregiver at nursing homes and hospitals, raised the family on her own. He also spent time with his grandfather—who lived down the street—and recalls the older man leaving for work at his auto plant job before dawn every day.

Auto workers, many of whom like his father and grandfather had grown up in poverty, won a relatively decent standard of living through mass struggles, such as the 67-day General Motors strike in 1970. By the late 1970s, the American ruling elite responded to the growing economic challenge of its global competitors by initiating an offensive against the working class aimed at stripping workers of the gains of generations of struggle. The Chrysler bailout of 1979-80—and the wage cuts, factory closures and mass layoffs that accompanied it—was the opening shot in this assault, which continued with the wave of union-busting in the 1980s and 1990s.

Since 1970, three-quarters of Detroit’s manufacturing jobs have been destroyed, wiping out employment for 250,000 workers. The city, which once boasted the highest median income and home ownership rate of any major urban area in America, is now the poorest in the nation, with a Depression-level jobless rate of 25 percent and more than one in three of its residents living below the official poverty line. The Obama administration’s forced bankruptcies of General Motors and Chrysler will deepen this social crisis and set the stage for an assault on every section of the working class.

The bitter experiences of the late 1970s and early 1980s, including the abandonment of any defense of the working class by the United Auto Workers and other unions, and the anti-working class policies carried out by the Democratic Party in Detroit and nationally, were the critical events that shaped D’Artagnan Collier’s life and political views.

In 1984, at the age of 16, he joined the Young Socialists, the youth movement of the Workers League, the predecessor of the Socialist Equality Party, and for the last 25 years has played a leading role in the struggle to build a revolutionary leadership in the working class.

Below we post an interview with Collier about the experiences that led him to join the socialist movement.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-yout-480.jpg
Campaigning among youth in Detroit in the 1980s

In the course of our campaign, many people have asked—How did I become a socialist? What drove me to conclude that the only way forward for the working class was socialism?

Most of my coworkers and friends voted for Barack Obama. They’re deeply affected by the crisis of capitalism, by the soaring foreclosures and unemployment, declining wages, the cuts to the school system, and the destruction of Detroit.

In explaining why I think it is necessary to break completely with the Democratic Party, to build the Socialist Equality Party as the new mass party of the working class, I point to the nature of the political situation in the US today, to the right-wing policies of the Obama administration, its support for the banks and its attack on the working class.

It is also important, however, to look at this question historically. My decision to become a socialist was bound up with social experiences that affected millions of workers in the US and internationally.

I was born in July 1968. This was a very turbulent time in American life, particularly for blacks. It was only a few months after the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and a year after the Detroit rebellion of 1967. During that six-day upsurge in Detroit, 43 were killed and 342 injured, officially. Friends and relatives recalled to me how the city was occupied by over 13,000 federal troops and the National Guard marched through the neighborhoods, carrying loaded weapons and unafraid to shoot.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-riot-480.jpg
National Guardsmen during the 1967 Detroit riots

The riots in Detroit were part of a series of uprisings throughout the country—uprisings that grew out of conditions of poverty, social neglect, unemployment, and government-sanctioned racism. Even at the height of the post-war boom of American capitalism, the “American Dream” was a cruel mockery for millions of workers.

The corporate elite drew its own conclusions from the riots. They understood that to contain social unrest, it was necessary to cultivate a layer of black businessmen and politicians. The concept of “black capitalism” was promoted, famously by President Richard Nixon [1969-74], whose administration also carried out the biggest federal expansion of “affirmative action.”

Racism was still a potent force, and many workers looked to the election of Detroit’s first black mayor, Coleman Young in 1973, and the hiring of black police officers as a real gain.

However, I never was drawn to black nationalism and identity politics. I was attracted by a desire to understand the broader world and didn’t view it through the prism of race. We were all proud of entertainers and singers like Sarah Vaughn and Jackie Wilson, and felt black contributions were not being recognized. However, I knew that race was not the fundamental issue. The problems I faced were also faced by my white friends and their parents who lived in the same neighborhood and went to the same schools. I saw corruption among the black politicians just like the white ones.

Only later did I realize how the corporate powers would cynically utilize race to control social struggle, by putting prominent blacks in charge of the same exploitation and profit-taking once overseen by whites.

I saw this with Mayor Young—who ran the city until 1993. Despite his claims to represent black people, he cut city services, attacked striking workers with the police and served the interests of the auto corporations, no less obediently than the big business politicians who were white.

I would come to realize later that the essential division in American society was class, not race, and that we had to build a political movement that united the entire working class against every effort to divide and weaken workers, whether through race, religion or nationality. This would be a very fundamental reason why I became a socialist.

As a youngster, I loved to go through piles of National Geographics magazines in my grandparents’ basement, the two daily newspapers, plus the Michigan Chronicle. I watched the news every night and was fascinated by science and the possibilities evoked by science fiction like Star Trek. In sixth grade I called myself a philosopher, and asked my mother my purpose in life. I came to the conclusion that the purpose of living was to help solve social problems.

Virtually every resident of our street was an autoworker. The growth of the auto industry, part of the post-war boom, made Detroit into the center of American capitalism, a city where workers could earn a decent wage with decent benefits.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-dodg-480.jpg
Demolition of Dodge Main

But in 1979, when I turned 11, we heard devastating news. Chrysler Corporation announced a $1 billion loss, threatened to file for bankruptcy and called for government help: we felt immediately that the future of my family and thousands of others were in doubt.

I, and many in my generation, witnessed dozens of Chrysler plants close over the next few years, including those where my family members worked: Dodge Main was shut in 1980 and Detroit Trim in the late 1980s. Tens of thousands of workers in Detroit lost their jobs almost overnight. My grandfather had to commute to Trenton Engine, an hour’s drive each way, for an entire year to keep a job at Chrysler. My mother insisted I concentrate on my studies because no one could count on a job in the plants anymore.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-chry-480.jpg
Chrysler workers protest plant closings, wage concessions in 1980

This was the beginning of a massive attack on the working class. When I turned 13, the Reagan administration broke the strike of the PATCO air traffic controllers by firing all of the workers and replacing them with strike breakers.

This was followed by a series of strikes in the 1980s that were systematically isolated by the unions and ended in defeat.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-patc-480.jpg
Striking PATCO air traffic controllers in 1981

I had seen for myself that the UAW was not protecting the Chrysler workers, and that the AFL-CIO had done nothing for the air traffic controllers. All around me, unions were being broken, people were losing their jobs. Right up the street from my childhood home, Cunningham Drugs workers were being locked out and their union broken.

The conditions of workers were being driven into the ground.

How could you make sense of these events?

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-wash-480.jpg
Half a million workers marched on Washington in September 1981

I met the Young Socialists 1984, when I was 16. The YS was the youth movement of the Workers League, the predecessor of the Socialist Equality Party. I was intrigued by their explanation of current events within a historical perspective and a coherent philosophy. I was particularly attracted to their call at that time for a Labor Party—a party of the working class and their understanding of the nature of the profit system.

Upon joining the Young Socialists in the summer of 1984, I threw myself into supporting the election campaign of Ed Winn, a Trotskyist member of the Workers League and a New York City transit worker.

Ed Winn had a long a principled record of struggle within the labor movement for socialism. He was a very impressive intellectual figure, while clearly a genuine worker. He used his campaign to oppose the growing threat of imperialist war, denouncing Reagan’s invasion of Grenada, the growing provocations against Nicaragua, the deployment of US Marines to Beirut, Lebanon and a massive military buildup. He was an internationalist.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-winn-480.jpg
Ed Winn

I learned that to be a socialist was to be an internationalist and defend the class interests of workers all across the world, and that the division of workers along national lines served the same purpose as the division of workers along racial lines.

In Detroit, tens of thousands of workers kept losing their jobs as more plants closed—Lynch Road Assembly, Huber Foundry, McGraw Glass, on and on—smaller shops went nonunion and a major recession eliminated jobs left and right.

The UAW was refusing to defend their members and instead attempting to divert workers’ anger into a vicious campaign aimed at the Japanese. A young Chinese-American, Vincent Chin, was murdered by a Chrysler supervisor who was ranting about foreigners taking American jobs, and the UAW was sponsoring the bashing of Toyotas in company parking lots.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-trot-480.jpg
Leon Trotsky

As socialists, we fought for workers to unite together internationally, both in defense of jobs and in opposition to all forms of imperialist war. The Workers League election campaign pointed to the significance of the struggle of Leon Trotsky and educated those of us who were coming into struggle in the history of the socialist movement.

At this time, the Young Socialists were playing a leading role in the fight for the release of then 26-year-old Gary Tyler, a black youth from Louisiana, who had been framed up for murder.

http://www.wsws.org/images/2009jul/j31-dart-gary-480.jpg
D'Artagnan Collier visiting Gary Tyler in Angola State Penitentiary on July 10, 1985.

During a protest at his high school against desegregation, Gary and his black classmates were targeted by a racist mob. After a white youth was shot, he was framed for murder and faced the death penalty. The Young Socialists pointed out that this attack was an attack on the democratic rights of the whole working class.

We mobilized support for Gary throughout the working class and internationally, gaining the signatures of hundreds of thousands of workers and youth. The governor of Louisiana who refused to pardon Gary or review these petitions was Democrat Edwin Edwards. During this period, Jesse Jackson, who also refused to raise the Tyler case, paid Edwards a respectful visit. Moreover, again, the leaderships of the major unions failed to take action on Gary’s case.

The treatment of Gary Tyler reinforced for me the need for the political independence of the working class, from both the Democratic and Republican parties, including the Black Congressional Caucus and other self-serving black politicians who clearly favored their careers at the expense of the working class, black or white.

During my senior year at Osborn High School, I organized students against the cuts in education by the Reagan administration. The school’s funding for extracurricular activities as well as books and supplies was affected. While distributing a leaflet calling on young people to turn to the working class as the only force capable of stopping the attacks on education, I was suspended from school for three days. Despite the fact that I was an honor roll student with an unblemished record, the authorities attempted to intimidate other young people by disciplining me.

Today I am running for mayor to bring the perspective of socialism to a new generation.

I am still deeply troubled by the prevalence of poverty and the dismal prospects of a decent future—in fact, conditions today are far more urgent than when I joined the fight for socialism.

Over the past twenty-five years the working class has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to fight. Over this same period all the old organizations—such as the UAW, the other unions and the civil rights establishment—have abandoned the working class.

A new generation is coming into struggle and the question of revolutionary leadership is more crucial than ever. We say to young people: study politics and learn the scientific philosophy of Marxism. Read the Historical and International Perspectives of the Socialist Equality Party.

Young people today will find in the Socialist Equality Party the policies and program necessary for the working class to resolve this historical crisis, to end imperialist war and create a world based on the highest achievements of mankind and the principle of social equality.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul2009/dart-j31.shtml

Kid of the Black Hole
08-01-2009, 12:29 PM
don't think it has gone unnoticed

Tertius
08-01-2009, 03:01 PM
Good stuff Tinoire, thanks for posting it.

Dhalgren
08-03-2009, 04:40 PM
this is being read. Good post, Tin...

meganmonkey
08-06-2009, 11:34 AM
Detroit is so fucked. It would be wild to see a socialist become mayor.

What do folks here think about this in general - a socialist party that actually runs candidates in elections? Is it a way to get the word out about socialism, remove it's bogeyman status? Or is it defeating the purpose completely because we know that elections aren't real and free and fair and no socialist candidate could win a meaningful office (I suppose there's Sanders but he barely counts)?

I wonder about this sometimes. I went to an SEP conference a couple yrs ago, wrote a big review of it here. It was really interesting and educational to me, but I didn't get sucked in to the organization. They aren't very organized anyway - I'll get an email from them about a day-long event here or in Detroit with a day or two notice - never enough time to actually plan to attend.

As an aside - my dad was in the Guard and was sent to Detroit during the riots. His post? Guarding an ice cream factory. He never fired his gun. He did eat some ice cream. Meanwhile my uncle was helping my mom move her and my dad's stuff to my gramma's house in Detroit in a black neighborhood. My uncle was a Catholic Priest so he dressed like one thinking it would provide a little safety. The way my dad tells this story cracks me up, although I know it is not funny in the least, what was happening then. My gramma's next door neighbor was an elderly black lady and she would sit on my gramma's front porch as a favor, so people wouldn't know it was a white lady's house and fuck it up.

I can't even fathom what it was like to be in Detroit then. I'm not sure which is worse - the anger and action of those years or the sadness and despair there now.

Two Americas
08-06-2009, 04:06 PM
I guess people really believe that politicians in elected office have a lot of power and are running things, which is why they think that if we can just get the right people elected to office all will be well.

meganmonkey
08-07-2009, 11:02 AM
for the people of Detroit, don't get me wrong. But I can't help but wonder, in general, if there is a secondary benefit to running candidates...

...like what KOBH is talking about here:

http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=100182&mesg_id=100242

And I would imagine that places like Detroit are ripe for 'building solidarity and promoting class power' (KOBH's words).

I've been curious about events happening in D-town, including some of the SEP ones, but I am lazy and wait till they show up in my email, and by then it's too late, especially since a lot of them are during the week and it's harder for me to get downtown.

I need to get off my ass.

Two Americas
08-07-2009, 11:50 AM
He might succeed at discrediting socialism.

meganmonkey
08-07-2009, 11:58 AM
'real' socialism can't happen through electing socialists in our current system? Or because of him in particular or the SEP? Or something else...please expand!

Two Americas
08-07-2009, 12:21 PM
What I mean is that there is no socialist movement that he represents. You can't simply vote a movement into being. Without a movement to represent, he would be hung out to dry - or become just another go along and get along politician. Can you envision a scenario where every elected official in the country was a "socialist" and nothing changed? I can.

Politics is not about a person's identification with an ideology nor about choices. That is anti-politics, and is mostly what we already have. There is a difference between advancing socialism and personally "being" a socialist. Lots of people identify as socialists and then work against it. Others have little in the way of theory or ideology, and don't worry about identifying with some team, and yet express and promote ideas that advance socialism.

I think the idea that if we were just given the "choice" of voting for people with the right ideology, and then if we could somehow get them elected to office that then everything would be swell is just delusional.

runs with scissors
08-07-2009, 12:29 PM
There's an actual movement, albeit small, that identifies with some (vague) core principles (?) and then promote their candidates. It's not a large movement in terms of national politics but you can see how it works, and it's exactly as you've described it.

Kid of the Black Hole
08-07-2009, 12:30 PM
It is not clear what DArtagnan is actually putting on the table. He has some rhetorical flourishes, OK. He has some emotional appeals to the working class. OK.

How does this connect to the state Detroit is really in today? I mean, shit, that is what half of America is going to look like very soon so someone should be drawing some lessons from it.

The answers aren't clear to me, but it may be just as important to know what questions are being asked? Is Datagnan as mayor going to demand federal help for rebuilding the city? Is he going to make his campaign and potential term in office about restoring good paying jobs, about providing basic amenities, about the complete abandonment of the city by, well, everybody? About the utter depravity of those in power to so callously turn their backs and walk away? About the illegitimacy of a system that would allow that to happpen?

If DArtagnan just pushing factional political line (and its from WSWS so thats likely), you can forget it.

Two Americas
08-07-2009, 12:55 PM
Libertarianism doesn't need a mass popular movement. In fact, it is better if they don't. They have the money - and that is why the whole electoral choice, personal belief system, sales and marketing approach, brand name, and personality crap works for them, and why those things will never work for us. Yet so many liberals, Democrats, progressives and even socialists insist on taking that approach to politics.

As Chlamor, would say "the tools are not neutral."

The tools that we insist on using were designed to advance the interests of the ruling class, and that is what they will always do. If we reduce the political Left to a personal belief system, to a product, to being an alternative choice, and then try to sell and market it or find the right personalities we will always lose.

meganmonkey
08-07-2009, 01:07 PM
you say: I think the idea that if we were just given the "choice" of voting for people with the right ideology, and then if we could somehow get them elected to office that then everything would be swell is just delusional.

But that's not where I'm coming from at all... :shrug:

Two Americas
08-07-2009, 01:28 PM
Sorry I wasn't clear about that. Were we to have that idea... many do have that idea.