Log in

View Full Version : Democratic Hypocrisy: SCOTUS outrage and Election Fraud silence



TruthIsAll
01-29-2010, 07:15 AM
Democratic Hypocrisy: SCOTUS outrage and Election Fraud silence

TruthIsAll

Democrats are making a big deal about Justice Alito shaking his head during Obama’s State of the Union speech. The Supreme Court ruling that there be no limit to corporate political contributions has been lambasted by the Democrats – and rightly so. But it’s just the latest outrage in the ongoing, multi-faceted GOP mission to steal elections that they cannot win fairly. Until the Democrats attack the real problem of systemic election fraud, their faux outrage should be taken with a grain of salt.

Why were the Democrats silent about the Bush v. Gore judicial coup in which the Felonious Five stole the election? Only the Congressional Black Caucus spoke up.

Why did the Democrats let Bushco get away with voter disenfranchisement, butterfly ballots, 65,000 underpunched and 110,000 overpunched ballots in Florida 2000? At least 5.4 million were uncounted nationwide. Gore won the True Vote in Florida by at least 50,000; he won by 3 million nationally.

The Democrats were duped into voting for the Help America Vote Act in 2003 and legitimize the installation of unverifiable DRE touchscreens and optical scanners.

In the 2002 GA senate race, the voting machines stole the seat of popular senator Max Cleland – as well as a few others.
Not a peep from the Democrats.

In 2004, massive election fraud turned a 10 million True Vote Kerry landslide into a bogus 3 million recorded Bush “mandate”.
Not a peep from the Democrats.

In 2006, massive election fraud denied the Democratic landslide in the midterms. They won 10-20 more GOP seats than were recorded.
Not a peep from the Democrats.

In 2008, massive election fraud cut the Obama landslide from over 20 million to less than 10 million votes.
Not a peep from the Democrats.

In 2010, the Democrats would probably have won the MA senate race if they just bothered to count all the optical scanned paper ballots.
Coakley won the hand-counted precincts. Not a peep from the Democrats.

[code]

2004: The True Vote
National 2000 2000 2004 Turnout ---Vote shares--- ---Votes (000)---
Cast Recorded Alive Turnout Mix Kerry Bush Other Kerry Bush Other
DNV - - - 22,559 17.94% 57.0% 41.0% 2.0% 12,859 9,250 450
Gore 55,789 51,004 53,000 51,940 41.31% 91.0% 8.0% 1.0% 47,265 4,157 518
Bush 51,046 50,460 48,494 47,524 37.80% 10.0% 90.0% 0.0% 4,752 42,771 0
Other 3,990 3,953 3,790 3,714 2.95% 64.0% 17.1% 18.9% 2,377 633 704

True 110,825 105,417 105,284 125,737 379EV 53.49% 45.18% 1.33% 67,253 56,812 1,672

2000 Gore Bush Other Recorded 252EV 48.27% 50.73% 1.00% 59,028 62,041 1,224
Record 48.38% 47.87% 3.75% Discrepancy 5.22% -5.55% 0.33% 8,225 (5,229) 447
ExitP 49.39% 46.86% 3.75% Exit Poll 337EV 51.92% 47.08% 1.00% 63,492 57,576 1,225


National 2004 True Vote Sensitivity Analysis
Kerry Share Kerry Share
of Gore of DNV
89% 90% 91% 92% 93% 55% 56% 57% 58% 59%
of DNV of Bush
59% 53.0% 53.4% 53.8% 54.3% 54.7% 12% 53.9% 54.1 54.2% 54.4% 54.6%
58% 52.8% 53.3% 53.7% 54.1% 54.5% 11% 53.5% 53.7% 53.9% 54.0% 54.2%
57% 52.7% 53.1% 53.5% 53.9% 54.3% 10% 53.1% 53.3% 53.5% 53.7% 53.8%
56% 52.5% 52.9% 53.3% 53.7% 54.1% 9% 52.7% 52.9 53.1% 53.3% 53.5%
55% 52.3% 52.7% 53.1% 53.5% 54.0% 8% 52.4% 52.5% 52.7% 52.9% 53.1%

Kerry Margin Kerry Margin
(in thousands) (in thousands)
59% 9,266 10,305 11,344 12,383 13,421 12% 11,440 11,891 12,342 12,794 13,245
58% 8,815 9,854 10,893 11,931 12,970 11% 10,490 10,941 11,392 11,843 12,294
57% 8,364 9,403 10,441 11,480 12,519 10% 9,539 9,990 10,441 10,893 11,344
56% 7,913 8,951 9,990 11,029 12,068 9% 8,589 9,040 9,491 9,942 10,393
55% 7,462 8,500 9,539 10,578 11,617 8% 7,638 8,089 8,541 8,992 9,443

Kerry Electoral Vote Kerry Electoral Vote

59% 351 370 390 390 398 12% 390 390 390 390 398
58% 351 357 390 390 398 11% 390 390 390 390 390
57% 351 351 379 390 390 10% 360 373 379 390 390
56% 346 351 373 390 390 9% 351 351 351 357 379
55% 346 351 360 390 390 8% 346 351 351 351 351

LuPeRcALiO
01-31-2010, 10:08 AM
Those are great questions. The obvious answers would be corruption and intimidation, but somehow I think it goes beyond that. Howard Dean for example let the DNC issue a phony whitewash of the 2004 Ohio scam, and Dean seems more or less uncorrupted, though not perhaps without his own reasons for sanctioning the crap "investigation" headed up by Donna Brazille, whom I don't trust at all.

Anyway I personally don't think the Dem party is hopeless. I didn't vote for Obama because I knew I didn't need to, but I wouldn't have wanted to see him lose, and he might in 2012, at least officially, at the rate we're going. He doesn't seem too concerned about it. Does he know about the fraud? Does Coakley? Kerry seems to have figured it out, but decided he'd been gamed too badly to pull out a win.

Maybe Gore v. Bush or whatever that 2000 SCOTUS ruling was called cooled everybody's appetite for election reform. If so it was even more destructive than we realized at the time.