atheo
10-14-2008, 10:50 AM
by Ken Adachi
September 6, 2007
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/amygoodmanandgerogeshultz06sep07.shtml
There are only two FM talk radio stations that I can listen to in the morning: NPR (National Propaganda Radio) and KPFK, a Pacifica radio station out of Los Angeles. NPR is a continuous stream of Tavistock propaganda spewed out like a machine day after day. I listen to NPR to find out what the Illuminati WANTS us to believe. I can depend on NPR to get the Party line.
KPFK has a better reputation for real news. Amy Goodman's show, Democracy Now, is on twice every morning- at 6AM and again at 9AM. Most of her shows deliver good, hard hitting stories. Easily 90 % of her material is dead on target. However, Amy Goodman -like Noam Chomsky or Bill Moyers- is a "Gatekeeper:" a reporter, or investigator, or journalist, or writer, or columnist, or talk show host-who serves the propaganda goals of Tavistock (& the Rockefellers) by keeping the stories they report within certain corridors of accepted 'controversy'. This morning, September 6, 2007, I heard Amy Goodman's taped interview with George Shultz and Paul Ehrlich who were "panelists" with the Aurora Forum-moderated by Amy Goodman-held at Stamford University in California in a propaganda effort titled "Clean, Secure, and Efficient Energy: Can We Have It All?"
You can read the entire transcript below of what I heard, so I won't repeat their comments here, however, I will explain how the Sting is played: Amy Goodman (role- fearless reporter/moderator who will ask the "hard" questions) questions George Shultz (role-dignified ex-statesman, all-knowing political savant, corporate big wig, and Hoover Institute Fellow) some questions that "sting" George a bit. George responds to her opening questions with utter poppycock and simplistic falsehoods.
Paul Ehrlich (role-pro-environmental "good guy", author, distinguished professor, etc.) immediately jumps into his performance with the words: "I disagree totally" He goes on to call George on his poppycock response and then proceeds to work up the "real" story with Amy about the environmental difficulties we now face due to the "real" problem-which Big Oil supporting Republicans like Shultz won't own up to: Global Warming and Peak Oil, the Twin Nemesis of Doom and Gloom heralded by Illuminatus Al Gore that have overflowed the airwaves for the past 9 months (and will continue to be shoved down our throats for many months to come I'm sure).
Illuminatus George Shultz is supposedly angered by all this "real time" truth telling and appears somewhat miffed, although tolerant for a time. As the taped interview continues, however, 'tough question' moderator Amy Goodman continues to asks questions that are just a wee bit too "provocative" for statesman George, who eventually pulls off his microphone and tells Amy " And that's enough."
Not to worry, though, you'll still get plenty of opportunity to hear George regurgitate his Tavistock opinions as Amy keeps going back to taped interview segments with George right up to the end of the hour.
Of course, Paul Ehrlich and Amy tie up all the loose ends, explaining how the Twin Nemesis of Global Warming and Peak Oil must be squarely confronted and dealt with-NOW- while it's still possible to take action. Amy wraps up the interview by mentioning that she just happened to "bump" into Robert Kennedy (member of one of the 13 top Illuminati families in America) on the plane yesterday and asked him about his take on the Global Warming solutions. Not surprisingly, Robert Kennedy also recently published a book echoing the Global Warming'-The Sky is Falling'- scheme (eh, ..theme) and interestingly responded to Amy's question that his ideas for environmental solutions would include a look into "media consolidation" and "campaign finance reform" ( I kid you not).
By the way, Amy and Paul repeatedly remind us during this dialog that there is "no longer" any genuine scientific debate about Global Warming. No sir, according to these two Rockefeller propagandists, the "scientific concensus" is unanimous: Global Warming is now to be considered a scientific fait-de-com plait and only those greedy Neocons from the oil industry are trying to forestall the inevitable conclusions from this Inconvenient Truth and convince you otherwise (I guess they haven't read our page exposing the Global Warming hoax with dozens of science papers dismantling the Global Warming "concensus" of their Rockefeller funded "scientists")
All in all, a pretty good play (eh, ..day) [roll credits]
Ken Adachi
© Copyright 2007 Educate-Yourself.org All Rights Reserved.
---
Link to transcript:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/06/1412242
September 6, 2007
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/amygoodmanandgerogeshultz06sep07.shtml
There are only two FM talk radio stations that I can listen to in the morning: NPR (National Propaganda Radio) and KPFK, a Pacifica radio station out of Los Angeles. NPR is a continuous stream of Tavistock propaganda spewed out like a machine day after day. I listen to NPR to find out what the Illuminati WANTS us to believe. I can depend on NPR to get the Party line.
KPFK has a better reputation for real news. Amy Goodman's show, Democracy Now, is on twice every morning- at 6AM and again at 9AM. Most of her shows deliver good, hard hitting stories. Easily 90 % of her material is dead on target. However, Amy Goodman -like Noam Chomsky or Bill Moyers- is a "Gatekeeper:" a reporter, or investigator, or journalist, or writer, or columnist, or talk show host-who serves the propaganda goals of Tavistock (& the Rockefellers) by keeping the stories they report within certain corridors of accepted 'controversy'. This morning, September 6, 2007, I heard Amy Goodman's taped interview with George Shultz and Paul Ehrlich who were "panelists" with the Aurora Forum-moderated by Amy Goodman-held at Stamford University in California in a propaganda effort titled "Clean, Secure, and Efficient Energy: Can We Have It All?"
You can read the entire transcript below of what I heard, so I won't repeat their comments here, however, I will explain how the Sting is played: Amy Goodman (role- fearless reporter/moderator who will ask the "hard" questions) questions George Shultz (role-dignified ex-statesman, all-knowing political savant, corporate big wig, and Hoover Institute Fellow) some questions that "sting" George a bit. George responds to her opening questions with utter poppycock and simplistic falsehoods.
Paul Ehrlich (role-pro-environmental "good guy", author, distinguished professor, etc.) immediately jumps into his performance with the words: "I disagree totally" He goes on to call George on his poppycock response and then proceeds to work up the "real" story with Amy about the environmental difficulties we now face due to the "real" problem-which Big Oil supporting Republicans like Shultz won't own up to: Global Warming and Peak Oil, the Twin Nemesis of Doom and Gloom heralded by Illuminatus Al Gore that have overflowed the airwaves for the past 9 months (and will continue to be shoved down our throats for many months to come I'm sure).
Illuminatus George Shultz is supposedly angered by all this "real time" truth telling and appears somewhat miffed, although tolerant for a time. As the taped interview continues, however, 'tough question' moderator Amy Goodman continues to asks questions that are just a wee bit too "provocative" for statesman George, who eventually pulls off his microphone and tells Amy " And that's enough."
Not to worry, though, you'll still get plenty of opportunity to hear George regurgitate his Tavistock opinions as Amy keeps going back to taped interview segments with George right up to the end of the hour.
Of course, Paul Ehrlich and Amy tie up all the loose ends, explaining how the Twin Nemesis of Global Warming and Peak Oil must be squarely confronted and dealt with-NOW- while it's still possible to take action. Amy wraps up the interview by mentioning that she just happened to "bump" into Robert Kennedy (member of one of the 13 top Illuminati families in America) on the plane yesterday and asked him about his take on the Global Warming solutions. Not surprisingly, Robert Kennedy also recently published a book echoing the Global Warming'-The Sky is Falling'- scheme (eh, ..theme) and interestingly responded to Amy's question that his ideas for environmental solutions would include a look into "media consolidation" and "campaign finance reform" ( I kid you not).
By the way, Amy and Paul repeatedly remind us during this dialog that there is "no longer" any genuine scientific debate about Global Warming. No sir, according to these two Rockefeller propagandists, the "scientific concensus" is unanimous: Global Warming is now to be considered a scientific fait-de-com plait and only those greedy Neocons from the oil industry are trying to forestall the inevitable conclusions from this Inconvenient Truth and convince you otherwise (I guess they haven't read our page exposing the Global Warming hoax with dozens of science papers dismantling the Global Warming "concensus" of their Rockefeller funded "scientists")
All in all, a pretty good play (eh, ..day) [roll credits]
Ken Adachi
© Copyright 2007 Educate-Yourself.org All Rights Reserved.
---
Link to transcript:
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/06/1412242