Log in

View Full Version : Activist Laurie David Cited For Wetlands Violations



Montag
05-30-2009, 09:21 AM
Activist Laurie David Cited For Wetlands Violations
By SAM BUNGEY

http://www.mvgazette.com/article.php?21124


Noted environmental activist and Chilmark seasonal resident Laurie David has been cited and fined by the Chilmark conservation commission for fresh violations of the state Wetlands Protection Act.

The property owned by Ms. David off North Road was the subject of a series of wetlands violations in 2005, when construction of a stone fire pit, barbecue grill area and wooden stage for a children’s theatre with seating was begun in a wetland without a permit.

The new infractions occurred during the construction of a tennis court. Workers installed a makeshift road with boards and stones and drove heavy machinery across the resources area making a path to the tennis court site. Attempts to reach Ms. David were unsuccessful but Bart Thorpe, who said he is the contractor on the job, took full responsibility for the violations yesterday.

“She’s obviously a very busy person and she trusted the contractor, just like last time,” he said. “And I inadvertently made a mistake. It’s something she had no knowledge of and had nothing to do with, and it’s a minor thing.”

Following a site inspection, the Chilmark conservation commission voted to issue an enforcement order at a May 20 meeting.

The resulting order, addressed to a Los Angeles trust which is the owner of record of the property, demanded that all boards and rocks be removed from the area as well as the equipment and that a snow fence be built surrounding the damaged area to prevent future intrusion.

It also called for complete restoration and re-vegetation plan for the wetland areas and surrounding buffer zones.

And since it was a repeat offense, the conservation commission decided to institute a fine.

“Since this site has a history of violations a daily fine of $300 shall be levied starting May 22,” the order reads.

Conservation commission assistant Chuck Hodgkinson said this week that Mr. Thorpe submitted plans to the commission on Tuesday following the Memorial Day weekend, and the commission put a stop on the fine at a total of $900.

Mr. Hodgkinson added that a further site check Wednesday by conservation agent Russell Walton found that equipment had been removed and that the wetlands area had been regraded and fresh vegetation planted.

“From my standpoint it’s a minor infraction cased by an oversight of mine,” said Mr. Thorpe.

“Doing any kind of contract work things certainly happen, and we try and do our best to do things right. I got the ‘good job’ myself from the conservation officer yesterday.”

The repeated offense has unfortunate resonance for the producer of the Oscar-winning climate change documentary An Inconvenient Truth, who is known as an activist who encourages individuals to do their part in protecting the environment.

She recently completed a tour of American universities with singer Sheryl Crow titled the Stop Global Warming College Tour. She is co-author of Stop Global Warming: The Solution Is You! and The Down to Earth Guide to Global Warming and a frequent contributor to an environmentally-focused column for the Huffington Post.

The construction on Ms. David’s property has provided a focal point for rancor within the neighborhood.

News of the latest violation reached the commission via a neighborhood whistle-blower who contacted the Gazette yesterday but wished to remain anonymous.

Meanwhile neighbor Jacqueline Mendez-Diez wrote a frank letter, published in today’s paper, regarding the violations at the site. She is also quoted regarding the matter this week in the online environmental publication ecorazzi.com

For his part, Mr. Thorpe blamed Ms. Mendez-Diez for whipping up controversy over the violations.

“She’s not allowed near the property,” he said. “The person dong all this stirring up is on probation for a criminal restraining order.”

Ms. Mendez-Diez denied this, though she acknowledged that she had received a notice from Chilmark police warning her to not to trespass on the property, several years ago.

She maintained that she has in fact never trespassed and meanwhile accused Mr. Thorpe of dishonesty and bullying tactics.

“I don’t trust anything he says,” she said.

sweetheart
05-30-2009, 12:49 PM
So some rich wanker in a rich suburb on a posh island built his patio
a few feet the wrong direction on some wetland.

Wow, i think they built that ugly eyesore, washington DC on some wetland,
when will they have it removed and returned to its original state?

Wetland is being destroyed the planet over by huge corporate malfeasance and
big-chemical agriculture, but some poor sucker in martha's vinyard gets the
hammer for putting his barbaque pit and wooden deck in wrong. Surely he can
learn to use footings so that his architectures don't impact the ground,
but rather float over it.

This case tipped the scale for global climate change, the barbaque pit did it
and not biofuels... they had nothing to do with fucking the poor out of their
food supply. This kind of environmental gossip is trivial... its like hearing
that someone took a piss in the wrong place on a national park.

Montag
05-30-2009, 01:41 PM
To me this ties into the ecological footprint this woman is making too. Not only did she twice build things in a wetland, but because of her lifestyle she is probably consuming a far great amount of energy and resources than the average American (and certainly the average citizen of the planet)... One shouldn't have to be a Luddite to be an environmentalist, but live simply is environmental slogan for a reason.

sweetheart
05-30-2009, 03:35 PM
She probably pays more for the army in asia than you do.
Everyone who pays their US taxes (unavoidable in many cases),
is financing the evil warmongering empire - and no carbon offset
or living lightly offsets it.

maat
05-30-2009, 05:30 PM
I can, and do, communicate with my representatives about the U.S.'s irresponsible destruction of Mother Earth's resources. Obviously, they don't listen.

I think that the Davids just made a mistake; it looks like Laurie has tried to correct it. That's all that I can ask.

I've owned various land parcels before, and it has always seemed to be a fairly big battle to get accurate information from county officials as to what one can or can't do, and as to what one should or shouldn't do.

sweetheart
05-31-2009, 06:13 AM
It is no accident that the totalitarianism of slavery was perfected in its basic form
before it was re-defined as flexible labor. And does flexible labour have any choice?

Or is it in a pressurized system, injected in to the mold of the masters of mammon,
against every willing concern of the spirit.

Tripping you up on your land parcel is just part of it... you're not safe in your home
anymore; if its not some pesky neighbor nosing in to your barbacue pit,
its the cops doing searches and prepared to do an armed entry in to your premises based
on infinite pretenses to undermine the 4th amendment. Meanwhile they want to deploy
your kid in asia to murder civilians in their homes on a bankrupt bush credit card.

In a funny way, i must agree with milton friedman's comments in his interview with
jamie johnson in that film "the 1%" - when the nation collapses, it will be due to
too much government, not too little.

As more and more people realize that 911 was a controlled demolition, is there
any potential at all of eliminating these communist evil cheney felons that have
been rotting it all out from the core since nixon. And nobody bothered about bush's
barbacue pit, or his murder pits in asia... he got away with it.. only
some environmental person in the northeast gets it. Then we hate lindie england
and the institutions and men that ordered the torture, excused as geez, that
could be all of us... no it couldn't - though anyone who's paid US taxes in the last
20 years is now a party to torture and criminal murder.

That's the way they keep us on board... we all realize that we are a little bit part
of the big crime, and thus we all have a stake in covering up for the criminals.

But hey, a guy with a barbecue pit is a hipocrite, but a guy with a wine cellar is not,
a guy who wipes out an entire natural space to develop a monument to his ego, as
donald trump is intending on the east coast of scotland - there the rich get a free
ride because *jobs* and the proper bribes have been paid to the people who might
be offended by his barbeque pit.

And will the army ever clean up or pay for the damages of its barbeque pits in iraq,
where it incinerated toxic garbage in the open to the serious health repurcussions
to many millions of people... and that's not even mentioning the DU they shat all
over the place... even shit today in pakiganistan.. but damn poor bastard in
nantucket, you're the tipping point when montag sees hipocrisy.

Montag, is that a book in your pouch? If you remember that book until such a time
as they can once again be written down, will anyone be left who can read?