Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:52 pm

Ukraine Exposes White Supremacist Foreign Policy
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 02 Mar 2022

Image
Image Carlos Latuff

White supremacy is at the heart of US war propaganda. The exhortation to "stand with Ukraine" is no exception to this rule.

By now everyone knows that Ukraine’s flag is blue and yellow. It is impossible to miss as the Empire State Building in New York, the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, and the Eiffel Tower in Paris have all been bathed in those colors. Nearly every city and town across the United States has followed suit and politicians ranging from local legislators to members of congress shout “Stand with Ukraine!” at every opportunity.

Yet it must be pointed out that those blue and yellow motifs and pleas for solidarity are all about white supremacy. Ukraine is upheld as a bastion of “civilization” which is supposed to put it off limits for war and suffering. The quiet part is now being spoken out loud. We are told that Ukrainians are more deserving of concern because they are Europeans.

Ukraine’s deputy chief prosecutor said as much in a BBC interview. “It is very emotional for me because I see European people with blue eyes and blonde hair being killed…" He wasn’t alone in his assessment. An NBC reporter was asked why Poland was willing to admit Ukrainians even as it turned away other refugees. "Just to put it bluntly, these are not refugees from Syria, these are refugees from neighboring Ukraine. That, quite frankly, is part of it. These are Christians, they are white, they're ... um... very similar to the people that live in Poland.”

CBS followed suit, "This isn't a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan who has seen conflict rage for decades. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European - I have to choose those words carefully - city where you wouldn't expect that or hope that it was going to happen."

The narrative that only white people deserve peace and security is all the more shameful because the global south suffers from war and privation as a direct result of US/NATO actions. It is NATO that destroyed the nation of Libya, NATO which attempted to do the same in Syria, NATO that occupied Afghanistan, NATO which wages war across African countries with US, French and British troops deployed across the continent. The white world causes suffering and then says that the people of the global south are “uncivilized” with no rights that need to be respected.

A Watson Institute of Brown University study showed that more than 37 million people in North Africa, Western and Central Asia, and the Horn of Africa have been displaced by the US and its allies since 2001. The humanitarian disasters begun years ago are ongoing, as refugees use the Mediterranean and even the US border with Mexico as points of escape. After experiencing wars of aggression these nations are then subjected to punishment as the United States steals Afghanistan’s assets and keeps Syria under the thumb of Caesar Sanctions. These thefts cause more suffering and even death as nations are robbed of the ability to care for their people. Who is civilized and who is not?

Ukraine has been pushed to the forefront of American thought in order to defend the imperialist foreign policy which led to the current conflict with Russia. If the blue eyed nation is suffering it is because of US and NATO arrogance and aggression. Ukraine’s current situation is a direct result of the 2014 coup engineered by the US and its EU partners. An elected president was dispatched and a civil war began that has killed some 14,000 people. Ukraine is a US colony with a puppet government now under military attack. Ukrainians are themselves refugees as they flee to neighboring Poland, Romania, Slovakia and other countries. It is the supposedly advanced, democratic, and supposedly civilized who have created their problems.

Yet once again bare faced racism is evident. African migrants and students in Ukraine were prohibited from boarding trains and buses that could take them to safety. A group of Jamaican students was forced to walk 20 kilometers when they were forced off of a bus enroute to Poland. Africans and Jamaicans live and study all over the world because the US and Europe underdevelop their nations through a variety of means. Yet Ukrainians and Poles didn’t see people in need of help. They determined that the non-blondes were not deserving of assistance.

Ironically, it is the white supremacist underpinnings of US/NATO foreign policy which has created all of Ukraine’s suffering. The need to dominate, to “contain” Russia and its ally China is not playing out the way they had hoped but the Ukrainians be damned. The MinskII agreement which was unanimously approved in the United Nations Security Council was a roadmap to peace. Ukraine should be a neutral nation but that is the exact opposite of what its lords and masters in Washington want. The good faith negotiations that could resolve the crisis are a non-starter because NATO is a very dishonest broker.

The corporate media have joined the state in an extraordinary effort to create war propaganda. They deliberately tug at heartstrings and demand solidarity with Ukraine because the truth is very unpalatable. Instead of standing with Ukraine, Americans should stand with humanity across the world. If they did they would be better able to understand why there are wars in Europe or anywhere else.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/ukrai ... ign-policy

Talk about the 'elephant in the room'...How soon before we start hearing about 'Asiatic Hordes'?

***********************************************************

Image
Vladimir Putin and Joseph Biden in Geneva, Switzerland DENIS BALIBOUSE/POOL/AFP via Getty

The end of the cold war was the beginning of the America unipolar moment. But the "end of history" was followed by contradiction and arrogance
which brought the conflict in Ukraine into being.


The current crisis in the Ukraine will inevitably eventuate as that rarity: a turning point in world history. This involves a number of main points:

First, it clarifies that the preceding epoch, the Cold War, presumably ending in December 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union, will likely be seen in the future as a catastrophic success for U.S. imperialism.

A success to be sure—at least in the short term—as it inaugurated the rapidly receding era of “unipolarity” and the heyday of the “sole remaining superpower.”

But to attain this success, Washington executed a trio of critical blunders: there was the turbo-charging of religious zealotry that led initially to the alliance in Afghanistan in the 1980s that contributed to the demise of the Soviet Union—then the attack on New York and Washington in 2001 and the ignominious ouster of the U.S. from that same South Asian nation in August 2021. Whatever the case, it is evident that we have not heard the last of the zealots, especially since they receive covert and overt aid from certain friendly regimes, Saudi Arabia not least.

Then, when Washington forced the dissolution of the USSR, this allowed Moscow to cease subsidizing Moldova, Turkestan, Georgia and formerly socialist regimes in the vicinity. This allowed Russia to husband its resources leading to what Stanford scholar, Kathryn Stoner terms in her latest tome: “Russia Resurrected,” a self-explanatory title that speaks to the development of hypersonic missiles and an agricultural superpower and a nation that can turn geopolitical tides in Syria among other sites. Imperialism failed to acknowledge that Russia had outgrown the sellout years of Boris Yeltsin and adamantly refused to adapt accordingly. NATO should have collapsed in 1991 when the USSR did but instead extended its remit to Libya, along with destroying the former Yugoslavia and devastating Afghanistan.

And, above all—and ironically—the intervention in the Ukraine occurred as we were marking the 50th anniversary of yet another turning point: the U.S.-China entente of February 1972 on an anti-Soviet basis with the payoff to Beijing being massive direct foreign investment creating a juggernaut that bids fair to leave imperialism sprawling in the dust.

Indeed, arguably, it is the specter of China that drove imperialist strategy toward Russia. That is, confronting Beijing directly means a faceoff with Tesla and Apple and Microsoft and Starbucks and KFC and a slew of U.S. giants, whereas weakening China’s major partner—Russia—is more palatable, at least for the time being.

That is why, as I write, it is not only regime change in Kiev that is at issue: imperialism seeks regime change in Moscow, with all the dangers attendant with regard to toppling a nuclear power.

The ostensible issue --Ukraine joining the U.S. dominated NATO—would mean a rise in the stock price of Raytheon (former home of Pentagon chief, Lloyd Austin) and Lockheed Martin, as member states are required to spend more on advanced weaponry, which inevitably comes from these corporations.

With Germany pledging to re-arm, we also witness the shortsightedness of world imperialism, which refuses to learn the lessons of the 20th century, especially the catastrophe of world war ending with the uncovering of industrial funeral pyres in 1945. Not only Washington but London, Brussels and Paris should be shuddering right now.

Of course, since Germany will now be buying natural gas from Texas—and not Russia—this will satiate Washington: for the time being.

France is particularly culpable since Paris blathers and bloviates constantly about “strategic autonomy” but is so dependent upon Washington for aerial and satellite assets to keep a lid on its neo-empire in Africa, that it is paralyzed.

Brussels, Paris and Berlin apparently are unfamiliar with the recent memoir by sacked National Security honcho for Trump—John Bolton—who admitted that the 45th U.S. President saw the European Union as second only to China as an antagonist.

And this crisis in Ukraine will reinvigorate EU vassalage to U.S. imperialism.

However, the underlying contradiction of this crisis is historical: a glance at the map reveals that much of European territory is Russian and this huge nation still has a population twice the size of that of the Number 2: Germany.

In sum, while Western Europe was getting fat from the plunder of the Americas and Africa in recent centuries, Russia was moving eastward—often at the expense of China—and establishing its window on the Pacific in 1860: Vladivostok.

Thus, Western Europe was becoming a global power at the same time that it did not necessarily rule its home continent. Two centuries ago Napoleon sought to resolve this anomalous contradiction by invading Russia—and being soundly defeated. A few decades later in the 1850s there was the Crimean War as, again, France, Britain and Turkey ganged up on Russia.

Then there was the final self-inflicted wound when in 1905 London financed the Japanese attack on Russia, which backfired spectacularly in that it wounded white supremacy grievously as Du Bois, Ho Chi Minh, Sun Yat Sen and Nehru all recognized. But it also led to the transformative Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 that inaugurated the General Crisis of Capitalism itself—which has yet to dissipate—then was punctuated by the Tokyo payback in 1941-1942, when the British Empire was devastated when its cash cows of Hong Kong and Singapore were seized by Japan.

A few decades later, as noted, Washington repeated the blunder of building up Asia to confront Moscow when in 1972 the entente with China was brokered.

Russia is the equivalent of the “whale” in Melville’s “Moby Dick”, the pursuit of which drives the North Atlantic bloc into crazed self-destruction.

Of course, Russia was not standing still as it sought to weaken European colonialism in Africa when in the 1890s it armed Abyssinian/Ethiopia to the teeth as it defeated Italian invaders. Then under Soviet rule doing the same in Southern Africa from the 1960s to Southern Africa independence culminating in 1994 with the election of Nelson Mandela.

Of course, the Black community—or at least many among us—are culpable in that since the “Compromise of 1954,” anti-Jim Crow concessions in return for the ditching of our internationalists led by Paul Robeson, ill prepared us to understand global affairs or even capitalize upon an often favorable international situation.

Then there is the U.S. left which during the Cold War, assured us that once the alleged albatross of the Soviet Union disappeared, radicals and progressives would be liberated: instead, we see the emergence of right wing populists in Eastern Europe (Poland and Hungary particularly), not to mention Washington. In France, the presidential election is today characterized by a surfeit of these types with the once mighty Communists and Socialists on the back foot.

There are many lessons to draw from today’s crisis but among them must be not only a better understanding of history and the international correlation of forces—but also stronger collectives by which we can take advantage of propitious moments.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/crisi ... ern-europe

***************************************

“Cuba advocates a solution that guarantees the security and sovereignty of all”
Statement from Cuba’s Revolutionary Government


Author: Cubaminrex | internet@granma.cu

february 28, 2022 09:02:30

Image

The U.S. determination to continue NATO’s progressive expansion toward the Russian Federation’s borders has brought about a scenario with implications of unpredictable scope, which could have been avoided.
United States’ and NATO’s military moves toward regions adjacent to the Russian Federation in recent months are well known, and were preceded by the delivery of modern weapons to Ukraine, which together constitute a military siege.
It is impossible to make a rigorous and honest examination of the current situation in Ukraine, without carefully assessing the Russian Federation’s just demands of the United States and NATO, and the factors that have led to the use of force and non-observance of legal principles and international norms which Cuba strongly supports and, are, particularly for small countries, an essential resource in resisting hegemony, abuse of power and injustice.
Cuba is a country that defends International Law and is committed to the Charter of the United Nations. Cuba will always defend peace and oppose the use of force, and threats to do so, against any state.
We deeply regret the loss of innocent civilian lives in Ukraine. The Cuban people have had and continue to have a very close relationship with the Ukrainian people.
History will hold the United States accountable for the consequences of an increasingly offensive military doctrine beyond NATO’s borders, which threatens international peace, security and stability.
Our concern has grown worse with NATO’s recent decision to activate, for the first time, its Response Force.
Ignoring the well-founded claims made by the Russian Federation concerning security guarantees for decades and assuming that Russia would remain defenseless in the face of a direct threat to its national security was a mistake. Russia has the right to defend itself. Peace cannot be achieved by mounting sieges or encircling states.
The draft resolution on the situation in Ukraine not adopted by the UN Security Council February 25, which will be submitted to the General Assembly, was not intended as a genuine contribution to resolve the current crisis.
On the contrary, it is an unbalanced text, which does not take into account the legitimate concerns of all parties involved. It does not acknowledge either the responsibility of those who instigated or took aggressive action that led to the escalation of this conflict.
We call for a serious, constructive and realistic diplomatic solution to the current crisis in Europe, via peaceful means, ensuring the security and sovereignty of all, as well as regional and international peace, stability and security.
Cuba rejects hypocrisy and double standards. It should be recalled that in 1999 the United States and NATO launched a major attack on Yugoslavia, a European country that was fragmented with a high cost in human lives, in pursuit of geopolitical objectives, disregarding the UN Charter.
The United States and several of its allies have used force on many occasions. They have invaded sovereign states to bring about regime change and interfere in the internal affairs of other nations that do not submit to their interests of domination, defending their territorial integrity and independence.
They are also responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians, which they label as “collateral damage,” millions of displaced persons and widespread destruction across our planet in their wars of plunder.

Havana, February 26, 2022

https://en.granma.cu/cuba/2022-02-28/cu ... nty-of-all

************************************************

Ukraine Threatens Belarus to Launch Preemptive Attack

Image
Alexander Lukashenko, President of Belarus. March. 1, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@jatirado

Published 1 March 2022 (16 hours 38 minutes ago)

A senior official disclosed that it only takes President Volodymyr Zelensky's consent to launch a Ukrainian attack on Belarus.

On Tuesday, Alexey Danilov, Secretary of Ukraine's Security Council, noted that Kiev is considering launching preemptive missile strikes on Belarusian territory.

Ukraine's threat follows claims stating that Belarusian troops support Russian military operations against Kiev. However, Minsk has repeatedly refused any participation in the conflict. Moreover, there is no evidence proving the veracity of such claims.

In this sense, Alexander Lukashenko, President of Belarus, remarked that the country's troops had not abandoned their permanent bases and installations. The president also referred to the Ukrainian attack threat, expressing that Belarus is prepared to defend itself in case of being attacked.

Lukashenko stressed that the Belarusian military is ready to respond. The president said that all the units would be mobilized within 2-3 days if necessary as required during wartime.


The spike in tensions in the Russia-Ukraine crisis surged last week with Russia launching a full-scale military operation in Ukraine intended for the demilitarization and denazification of the country, as stated by the Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The special operation searched for restraining Kiev from continuing shelling the newly recognized Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. However, Kiev has denied the attack was perpetrated to recapture the regions, qualifying it as an unprovoked attack.

The conflict dates back to years ago, with the coup in 2014, which toppled the democratically elected government in Kiev. Since then, this region has suffered long years of conflict. Minsk agreements in 2014-15 ended active combat, but a lack of strictness in its implementation led to continuing hostilities in the region.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Ukr ... -0010.html

********************************************

Russia reports military deaths during operation in Ukraine

Image
The Russian Defense maintains that there are more victims among the Ukrainian military than among the Russians. | Photo: Sputnik
Published 27 February 2022

The Ukrainian army massively uses banned ammunition containing phosphorus in the suburbs of Kiev, occupied by Russian military units.

The Russian Defense Ministry offered information this Sunday on the casualties reported among Russian troops participating in the special military operation taking place in Ukraine.

The report highlighted that the number of Russian casualties and wounded is lower than those inflicted on the Ukrainian side, which includes soldiers, paramilitaries and nationalists, but no specific figures were provided.

Russia began a military operation on February 24 at the request of the self-proclaimed people's republics of Lugansk and Donetsk, which asked the Kremlin to intervene in the face of the atrocities committed by Ukraine against its population in the Donbas region.


Since the movement of troops towards Ukrainian territory, the troops have advanced in different land and sea positions in Ukraine, while Moscow and Kien converged this Sunday to start negotiations in the Gomez province in Belarus.

For his part, the spokesman for the Ministry of Defense, Igor Konashénkov, stressed "the Russian military show courage and heroism during the performance of the combat tasks of the special military operation. Unfortunately, there are dead and wounded comrades."

"But our losses are many times less than the eliminated nationalists. And the losses among servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine," he said.


He also insisted that the Russian military "will continue to treat with dignity" the Ukrainian troops who laid down their arms, adding that the Russian forces know how few captured Russian military are treated by the Ukrainian Nazis.

"All the faces, voices, telephone numbers, their coordinates, IP addresses, as well as the correspondence of all the Nazis involved in the torture of our comrades are recorded and identified," he reiterated.

On the war front, he stressed that the Russian military destroyed a total of 1,067 facilities of Ukraine's military infrastructure, including 27 checkpoints and communication posts, 38 anti-aircraft defense complexes S-300, Buk M-1 and Osa .


In addition, 254 tanks and other armored fighting vehicles, 31 aircraft on the ground, 46 multiple rocket launch systems, 103 field artillery weapons and mortars, and 164 units of military automobile equipment were destroyed.

Russian troops enter Kharkiv, the second largest city in Ukraine
On this Sunday, the Russian authorities reported the entry of their troops into Kharkov, the second most important city in Ukraine, after Kiebv, the capital, where fighting is also taking place.

The president of the Kharkov Regional State Administration, Oleg Sineguboc, reported this Sunday that the Russian troops managed to break through until they reached the center of Kharkov, the second largest city in Ukraine.

"There has been an advance of Russian enemy vehicles in Kharkov, including the central part of the city," Sineguboc explained, asking citizens to stay home.

Kharkov, with a population of 1.4 million, is the main city in northeastern Ukraine and is close to the border with Russia and the pro-Russian separatist-controlled territories of Donetsk and Luhansk.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-mi ... -0015.html

Google Translator

Most people don't know or have forgotten that at the beginning of the Donbass revolt that Kharkov was about to join in when it was prioritized by the Nazis and the anti-fascist movement was brutally crushed. As with Odessa, the Russian cities which were transferred to the Ukraine SSR found that the conditions which made that acceptable, the unity of the USSR, no longer applied.

********************************************

"Kozyrevshchina" is a synonym for betrayal
colonelcassad
March 2, 8:24 am

Image

A source in the Foreign Ministry said ( https://tass.ru/politika/13924439 ) that the team is thinking about the proposal ( https://twitter.com/andreivkozyrev/stat ... 6900958210 ) of Andrei Kozyrev to surrender.

“Recommending diplomats to surrender and betray, Kozyrev knows what he is talking about from his own experience. Colleagues have always been ashamed that they worked with Kozyrev. No one has ever understood why such a person was appointed head of the Foreign Ministry. solemn event at the Foreign Ministry, where the country's foreign ministers - Primakov, Ivanov and Lavrov were present.

For 20 years of the existence of the Diplomat's Day, the staff and department have never congratulated Kozyrev on the holiday, because his name is considered a household name in the Foreign Ministry and is associated with the surrender of positions. It entered the diplomatic lexicon as "Kozyrevshchina" and is synonymous with betrayal.

Kozyrev claims he was proud of the colleagues he worked with. I just forgot to add that they did not reciprocate. Yevgeny Maksimovich Primakov received the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in critical condition after Kozyrev, only thanks to a team of professionals it was possible to keep the department from complete collapse.

Kozyrev is also the author of the catchphrase "Russia has no national interests." When he said it in response to a question from former US President Richard Nixon, specifying whether the United States would have advice on building our course, the American president was dumbfounded and only shook his head. The preface to Kozyrev's epistolary writings is written by the former US ambassador, the notorious Russophobe Michael McFaul. Kozyrev has been living abroad for a long time. And just as long has been conducting anti-Russian subversive work. Andrei Vladimirovich has already received his award, interest has run up on his thirty pieces of silver."

https://t.me/MID_Russia/18763 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7 ... tml#cutid1

Google Translator

*************************************

RUSSIA AND THE NEW MONEY ROUTE

Franco Vielma

2 Mar 2022 , 6:44 am .

Image
The financial suffocation of Russia could generate the strengthening of an economy without the dollar (Photo: AFP)

According to JP Morgan and Citigroup, the measures against Russia could weaken the hegemony of the dollar.
The Chinese yuan jumped from 35th place in 2010 to fifth in trade in the world in 2021.
In a recent article , the geopolitical analyst specializing in Asia and the Middle East Pepe Escobar, entitled "Follow the money: how Russia will bypass western economic warfare" (in Spanish "Follow the money: how Russia will avoid western economic warfare"), some enlightening statements by the American economist Michael Hudson where the impact and projection of the coercive measures applied against Russia are analyzed.

Hudson's approach is very simple, but reckless. In his opinion, the SWIFT-like systems developed by Russia and China, which will receive an unexpected boost from the "sanctions" on Russia, will help to reconfigure the Eurasian financial system.

As is known, the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union (EU) and Canada have applied a resounding package of financial measures against Russia as part of its military operation in Ukraine.

Russia's "partial" disconnection from SWIFT (Society for World Interbank Financial Telecommunication) will create serious limitations on many financial operations to and from Russia.

However, the Russian Federation created the SPFS (Financial Message Transfer System), its own SWIFT, currently in its infancy, precisely because of the "sanctions" against it in 2014. While China has already created and developed the CIPS (acronym for China International Payments System), also analogous to SWIFT and designed to dodge financial pressures.

Both instruments would be key for Russia in its difficult obligation to avoid the measures against it. However, with the new momentum that they could have now, they join accumulated events typical of the configuration of a financial and market system, not dependent on the US dollar.

THE NEW SILK ROAD: THE NEW MONEY ROUTE

The extremely aggressive financial actions of the West against Russia are not unrelated to the rise of the Eurasian economy, which today is making a real counterweight to the Atlanticist axis.

If we understand it through geo-commercial referents, China's relationship with the Eurasian bloc has been that of a new very vigorous milestone of trade, infrastructure and financing through the Belt and Road Initiative project, the deepest developing link between the East and West.

According to the reading of events and their possibilities, we could now begin to outline a new solid route of money, through transfers of capital in dollars and rubles from Russia to China, through the use of the mechanisms of both countries, which only strengthens the framework of possibilities that today are developing in the commercial infrastructures in Eurasia.

Hudson has no doubt that the Russo-Chinese system will be implemented. "The Global South will seek to unite," he says, moving to the new system.

Hudson's statement is not the only one in that direction. There is a concern shared by the American financial giants JP Morgan and Citigroup, according to a publication by Bloomberg :

"Removing Russia from the global SWIFT system, which handles 42 million messages a day and serves as a lifeline for some of the world's largest financial institutions, could backfire, driving up inflation, pushing Russia closer to China and shielding transactions. from scrutiny by the west. It could also encourage the development of a SWIFT alternative that could eventually damage the supremacy of the US dollar."

A 2021 publication by Susanne Barton for Bloomberg reports that the runaway printing of dollars by the US Federal Reserve over the past two years to artificially finance its budget and deal with the pandemic not only generated devaluation and inflation, it also caused that the dollar lost ground as a reserve currency.

"While more than 60% of the world's foreign exchange reserves are denominated in dollars, as they have been for more than two decades, dollar holdings fell to the lowest level since 1996," says Barton.

"HSBC Holdings Plc sees the yuan increasingly influencing weekly price changes in the pound and commodity-linked currencies, while strategists at Societe Generale SA see it weighing on risk sentiment," it adds.


The currency is now the fifth most used currency for global payments, accounting for around 2% of transactions, according to data from the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications, which handles cross-border payment messages for more than 11,000 financial institutions in 200 countries. In 2010, the yuan ranked 35th in trades registered on SWIFT. Notice the difference.

China's trend in the use of its currency is rising and it has been leaving prudent but solid records. According to its authorities, the country will "constantly and prudently" promote the internationalization of the yuan and continue to develop overseas yuan markets.

Last year the Asian country reported that settlements of cross-border operations in the local currency amounted to 28.39 trillion yuan ($4.39 trillion) in 2020, 44.3% more than the previous year, the People's Bank said. of China in its report on the internationalization of the yuan in 2021.

Yuan transactions accounted for 46.2% of total cross-border settlements, hitting a record high, the Chinese central bank said. This trend could only increase according to the volume of operations that can be done with and from Russia, using the yuan as currency.

The use of the yuan and the ruble in operations between these countries has been increasing. In 2021, the percentage of use of the respective national currencies in commercial transactions between Moscow and Beijing reached 25% in 2020, Russian Ambassador to China Andrei Denisov announced during a press conference.

Image
(Photo: CCTV-E)

"The share of national currencies in our relations with China is constantly increasing. According to the assessment of our Chinese partners, for the first eight or nine months of 2020 the proportion reached about a quarter of those transactions: between 24% and 25%. This is great progress," the diplomat declared, adding that in the years 2013-2014 this figure was around 2-3%.

In fact, the trend of the yuan is considered one of the key elements for Russia's survival in this new cycle of disfigurement of its economy. The country already accumulated 13% of its reserves in yuan, as it had been preparing for these scenarios since 2014.

In another order of ideas, the role of cryptocurrencies in shaping the world economy is not a small thing either. The cryptocurrency market reached its peak in the year 2021, with a market capitalization of approximately 2.4 trillion US dollars. Market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the total number of coins in circulation by the unit price.

The use of cryptocurrencies as a means of saving and payment is strongly linked to the exchange of these in local currencies. Although they have a use between individuals, this is now more frequent between companies, since the operations are subject to minimum commissions for carrying out the exchanges.

This has made cryptos an alternative competitive factor not only to the dollar, but also to the international financial system and its conventional routes.

The sum of the new bifurcations and financial paths, in the long run, have been manufacturing a new money route that could receive a boost from the "sanctions" against Russia.

A factor for the West in the long term is the result of the armed conflict in Ukraine, its prolongation and the lengthening of measures against Russia. Let us remember that the Federation is still dealing with measures against it since 2014 for the recovery of the Crimean peninsula, hence the lapse of the new measures against it are unspeakable, but undoubtedly long-term.

To the extent that the West prolongs the suffocation over Russia, more countries and companies will be forced to resort to intermediary instruments from Eurasia, favoring an entire economic fabric of a new type, without the use of SWIFT and, in many cases, without the use of the dollar.

Basically, what would change is the new center of gravity of finance and the world economy.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/ru ... del-dinero

Google Translator

********************************************

CP of Greece, Dimitris Koutsoumbas: Socialism is the real progress. No to imperialist war! Greece’s involvement must stop immediately!
3/1/22 3:48 PM

Greece, Communist Party of Greece Ar En Es Ru Europe Communist and workers' parties
Dimitris Koutsoumbas: Socialism is the real progress. No to imperialist war! Greece’s involvement must stop immediately!


On 27/2/22, the CC of the KKE organized an event in the city of Lamia in honour of the 80 years of the Greek People’s Liberation Army (ELAS), which was the military wing of the National Liberation Front (EAM). Both EAM and ELAS were founded following a decision of the KKE and fought against the fascist triple foreign occupation (German, Italian, and Bulgarian) of Greece during the imperialist Second World War.

The event took place in Lamia, the native city of Aris Velouchiotis, leader of ELAS and cadre of the KKE.

The event included a speech by Dimitris Koutsoumbas, GS of the CC of the KKE, and a concert. A march to the statue of Aris Velouchiotis was held right after.

During his speech, the GS of the CC of the KKE referred to the imperialist war in Ukraine, highlighting the following:

“Here, from the city of Lamia, at this great celebration for the 80th anniversary of the foundation of ELAS, we are shouting out loud: No to imperialist war! Any involvement of Greece must stop immediately! The bases must be immediately closed down!

This is the crucial issue for our people these moments when the sirens of war are being heard and Russia’s intervention and invasion of Ukraine is underway.

The sirens of war are heard for the second time on European soil, 30 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the overthrow of socialism. The peoples futilely seek the “peaceful” and “safe” world that they were promised back then!

The only thing we are seeing now is permanent insecurity, poverty, and wars.

Europe now counts two wars. Let us remember Yugoslavia and the heroic pages written by our people’s struggle as well.

The military conflict in Ukraine is the result of the sharpening of competition between two warring camps. It is focused on spheres of influence, market shares, raw materials, energy plans, and routes of transport. This competition can no longer be resolved by diplomatic–political means and fragile compromises.

On the one hand, there is the USA, NATO, and the EU which installed and support the reactionary puppet government of Kyiv, the paramilitary mechanisms, and the fascist groups in Ukraine. The USA–NATO for years have been promoting their positions by expanding NATO, aiming at the military encirclement of Russia.

On the other hand, there is today’s Russia, which is promoting its own plans for the capitalist unification of the former USSR countries and territories.

War, dear comrades and friends, is the continuation of the same policy with other, violent means. War, as well as the death and destruction it causes, inevitably stems from capitalist–imperialist competition.

We cannot forget that the peoples of Russia and Ukraine had been living in friendship and thriving in peace for decades under socialism. No matter how much anti-communist poison is spread by various mouthpieces of propaganda, they cannot erase this fact from people’s memory. Historical truth and reality cannot be erased.

On the contrary, each passing day proves that the way out can be found only in the conflict with the unjust capitalist system that gives rise to poverty and war. This is the alternative path that those and all peoples must follow today.

Greece is not innocent of the crime! It is actively participating in this imperialist competition aiming at the geostrategic enhancement of the Greek ruling class, that is its participation in the looting and the redistribution of the pie taking place through new crimes against the peoples.

The Greek governments of ND, PASOK, and SYRIZA, one after the other have backed NATO decisions and plans regarding its expansion, the encirclement of Russia, and other plans against the peoples. They initiated the installation of new US–NATO bases in our country, such as that of Alexandroupolis, which has become a hub for the transfer and deployment of military forces to Eastern Europe.

Thus, our country becomes a perpetrator against other peoples but at the same time, it can become easy prey. Greece is the one in danger and not the USA, which is situated on the other side of the world.

Greece and our people can become a target of retaliation, as Russia has already warned about Alexandroupolis and other military bases.

Greece and our people are bleeding due to high prices, rising fuel prices, energy poverty, and armaments.

Greece and our people will suffer a heavy toll as, among other things, the Turkish bourgeoisie’s appetite for its unacceptable claims on the Aegean for the revision of agreements and the dispute of borders as well as the Cyprus Issue has increased.

The response from the workers’–people’s and our country’s perspective lies in an independent line, away from all bourgeois and imperialist plans.

In the face of the new crime, the clear answer can only be one:

*No to imperialist war.
*Only the peoples can chart their course and choose their own path, away from the self-serving interests of the bourgeois classes and their governments, which are solely responsible for the massacre they are leading us to.
*Greece’s involvement must stop immediately.
*All military bases in our country must be immediately closed down.
*We strengthen the struggle for disengagement from imperialist unions, with the people masters in our land.”


D. Koutsoumbas also referred to the heroic activity of ELAS and the lessons that the KKE has drawn from its history, which are particularly useful for today. He concluded his speech by saying that “It is not progress for the people to live on crumbs so that a handful of parasites earn profit. Progress means that people move forward and improve their lives. Progress means that the new generations live better than the previous ones. Which policy can guarantee this? Only a government that will be the executive body of the working-class and popular majority and power can truly do that. Only the KKE talks about this government. Only the KKE is waging a struggle. And it is determined to take this struggle to the very end. It is this working-class and popular majority that will be at the forefront and build the new society, socialism! Socialism is the real progress today!”.

http://solidnet.org/article/CP-of-Greec ... mediately/

It is possible to recognize the legitimate grievances of the people of Donbass, the capitalist nature of the current Russian government and the hegemony of the US and it's NATO vassals simultaneously but it seems difficult for some...Comparing 'Russian imperialism' to US imperialist hegemony is comparing a house cat to a Siberian Tiger. Yeah, they're both cats...
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:54 pm

Around the world: Condemnation for NATO, solidarity with Donbass and Russia
March 2, 2022 Greg Butterfield

Image
Moscow news conference with Grup Yorum, Feb. 21. Photo: Anti-Imperialist Front

To hear the U.S. corporate media tell it, the entire world has joined Washington in condemning Russia’s recognition of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics in Donbass and their joint anti-fascist military operation in Ukraine. But in reality, nothing could be further from the truth.

It’s a fact that NATO allies and dependents have repeated the lies of an “unjustified Russian invasion” verbatim from U.S. State Department news releases. U.S.-owned social media platforms are flooded with “Pray for Ukraine” propaganda, much of it spiced up with photos of alleged Russian war horrors – often from attacks actually carried out by the U.S. and its proxies (in Yugoslavia, Palestine and even Donbass itself).

What’s being carefully hidden from workers and oppressed people here is the opposition of many countries and movements to NATO expansion. They are aware of Washington’s true role: making an armed conflict inevitable by stoking the flames of war in the region for months and years.

This is especially true in the case of the many countries that are themselves targets of U.S. war, sanctions and slander campaigns.

Image
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Graphic: Alliance For Global Justice

Bolivarian Venezuela

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has faced down many U.S.-instigated coups and assassination attempts. On Venezolana de Televisión Feb. 22, Maduro announced his government’s support for Russia’s decision to recognize the Donbass republics.

“We have been attentive to the events in Russia and in Ukraine, and we have been observing, not just now, but the whole evolution of the process where the North American empire and NATO intend by military means to end Russia, and to end this multipolar world that is already a reality.

“The Lugansk territory and the Donetsk territory assumed the functions of People’s Republics to defend themselves from a massacre that the fascist sectors, which had seized power in Ukraine, began to carry out. Hunting men, hunting women, assaulting families, bombing with heavy weapons.”

Maduro noted that during “all the stages” of this “extremely harsh conflict” in the region, “the diplomatic proposal, calling for dialogue, of President Putin has always been present.” This resulted in the Minsk agreements that were established to guarantee peace. However, these were “ripped to shreds by the neo-fascist ruling elite of Ukraine.”

He added: “The old colonialisms of Europe and the United States attack Russia, China and Iran, they threaten Turkey and Latin America, they also attack Cuba, Nicaragua, Bolivia, and Venezuela. The old colonialisms, the old superiority complexes of Europe and the old complexes of rapacious colonialism represented by NATO and the neo-colonialism of the U.S. empire.”

Maduro called Putin on March 1. “Putin shared his assessments of developments around Ukraine, noting that the goals of the special military operation are to protect civilians in Donbass, Kiev’s recognizing the DPR and LPR and Russia’s sovereignty over Crimea, as well as the demilitarization and denazification of the Ukrainian state, and ensuring its neutral and nuclear-free status,” the Kremlin press service reported.

“Nicolas Maduro expressed strong support for Russia’s decisive actions, condemned the destabilizing activity of the United States and NATO, and stressed the importance of countering the campaign of lies and disinformation launched by Western countries.”

Socialist Cuba

On Feb. 23, on the eve of the anti-fascist military operation, President Miguel Diaz-Canel and a large, high-level Cuban delegation met with visiting chair of the Russian Federation’s State Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin.

Granma reports, “The Cuban president expressed his solidarity with the Russian Federation also facing escalating U.S. aggression and the expansion of NATO toward its borders.” Volodin emphasized Russia’s “condemnation of U.S. hostility toward [Cuba] and reiterated the will to continue strengthening exchanges at all levels.”

An official Declaration of the Revolutionary Government of Cuba on Feb. 26 stated: “The American determination to continue the progressive expansion of NATO towards the borders of the Russian Federation has led to a scenario, with implications of unpredictable scope, that could have been avoided. …

“History will hold the U.S. government accountable for the consequences of an increasingly offensive military doctrine outside NATO’s borders, which threatens international peace, security and stability.

“Our concerns are reinforced by the decision recently adopted by NATO to activate, for the first time, the Response Force of that military alliance.

“It was a mistake to ignore for decades the well-founded demands for security guarantees by the Russian Federation and to assume that the country would remain defenseless in the face of a direct threat to its national security. Russia has the right to defend itself. It is not possible to achieve peace by encircling or cornering states.”

Nicaragua and Bolivia

Speaking Feb. 21, on the anniversary of the assassination of the great revolutionary Augusto Sandino, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega said: “President Putin has taken a step today whereby he recognized … republics bordering Russia that did not recognize the coup government [in Ukraine] and created their own governments there.

“They set up their governments, they took on that fight, they have engaged in that struggle for independence. They have written to us, sending us messages explaining why they are waging this struggle. And meanwhile Ukrainian troops are looking for ways to overcome them, to liquidate them, to murder them; there have been thousands of deaths there over all these years.

“Despite the aggression by the Ukrainian army, they have not been able to defeat them. So [Putin] has recognized these governments, and of course this also implies military support so that these governments have security.”

Former Bolivian President Evo Morales was the victim of a U.S.-backed coup in 2019, after an election marred by Washington’s interference. Fortunately, the militant people’s movement, led by Indigenous workers and peasants, returned the Movement Toward Socialism to power and Morales was able to come home in 2020.

Morales said: “NATO is a serious threat to international peace and security; it’s record of invasions and aggression proves it. Now, its expansionist attempt is one of the main reasons for the situation in Ukraine.”

Socialist Korea

A declaration by the Foreign Ministry of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) on Feb. 26 said in part: “The U.S. unilateral and unfair cold war mentality and its bloc-forming external policy transformed the structure of international relations into one of a new cold war, and they strain politico-military situations with each passing day and continue to spawn new knotty problems in different parts of the world. …

“In particular, the air raid conducted by NATO against Yugoslavia at the end of the last century served as an occasion of bringing to light the extent of U.S. and Western hypocrisy in their much-touted global peace and stability, territorial integrity and safeguarding of sovereignty, as well as of exposing in all its nakedness who is the real destroyer of international peace and stability.

“The Iraq war, the Afghan War and other ‘color revolutions’ which brought tragedy to the 21st century clearly substantiate the fact that the U.S. and the West would seek their policies of hegemony by fair means or foul.

“The present international order is that it has become an immutable law that seeds of discord are sown in every region and country where the U.S. intervenes, and that the relations between the states deteriorate.

“The root cause of the Ukrainian crisis also lies in the high-handedness and arbitrariness of the U.S. which has held on solely to the unilateral sanctions and pressure while pursuing only global hegemony and military supremacy in disregard of the legitimate demand of Russia for its security.”

Image
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying. Photo: PRC Foreign Ministry

People’s Republic of China

In numerous official statements, articles and social media posts, the government and people of China – the world’s most populous country and another target of the U.S. New Cold War – have made it crystal clear that Washington and NATO are responsible for the unfolding crisis in Eastern Europe.

On Feb. 27, the diplomatic legation of the Chinese Embassy in Moscow reminded the world that “Of the 248 armed conflicts that occurred between the years 1945 and 2001 in 153 regions of the world, 201 were initiated by the U.S., accounting for 81 percent of the total number.

“Never forget who is the real threat to the world,” the Chinese embassy said.

It added that the administration of President Joe Biden is to “blame for the current tensions around Ukraine” as it poured fuel on the fire “while accusing others of not doing their best to put out the fire.”

At a Feb. 23 news conference in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying stated: “When the U.S. drove five waves of NATO expansion eastward all the way to Russia’s doorstep and deployed advanced offensive strategic weapons in breach of its assurances to Russia, did it ever think about the consequences of pushing a big country to the wall?”

“The next day, as Ms. Hua was peppered with questions about whether China considered Russia’s ‘special military operation’ an invasion, she turned the briefing into a critique of the United States,” reported the New York Times. “‘You may go ask the U.S.: they started the fire and fanned the flames,’ she said. “How are they going to put out the fire now?’

“She bristled at the U.S. State Department’s comment that China should respect state sovereignty and territorial integrity, a longstanding tenet of Chinese foreign policy.

“‘The U.S. is in no position to tell China off,’ she said. Then she mentioned the three journalists who were killed in NATO’s bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade in 1999, a tragic incident that prompted widespread anti-U.S. protests in China.

“‘NATO still owes the Chinese people a debt of blood,’ she said.

“That sentence became the top Weibo hashtag as Russia was bombing Ukraine. The hashtag, created by the state-run People’s Daily newspaper, has been viewed more than a billion times. In posts below it, users called the United States a ‘warmonger’ and a ‘paper tiger.’”

Lebanon’s Hezbollah

The Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah rejected a statement by the country’s Foreign Ministry that condemned Russia’s actions. During a Feb. 25 cabinet session in Beirut, Minister of Labor Mustafa Bayram, a member of Hezbollah, said the statement violated the principles of neutrality espoused by the Lebanese government.

Ibraham Al-Moussawi, a member of parliament from the Loyalty and Resistance bloc, criticized government officials who “distance themselves and pretend to be neutral where they want, and … interfere and condemn where they want.”

In a March 1 televised speech, Hezbollah Secretary General Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah slammed the West’s “double standards” and stressed that the U.S. is not trustworthy.

“The U.S. is to blame over the crisis in Ukraine,” Nasrallah said. “Washington has been inciting and working on this scenario for weeks.

“How did the international community react to wars on Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Syria and Yemen? And how did it react to Russia’s military campaign in Ukraine? Such stances prove that the strongest is respected in this world while the weak are oppressed.”

Syria

Hezbollah, along with the governments of Syria and Iran, form the Axis of Resistance against U.S. imperialism in Western Asia. Together with Russia, they have fought to free Syria from the ultra-right Daesh movement and other Western allied “rebels,” and from U.S. occupation troops, in a war that has gone on for more than a decade.

Syria was among the first countries to welcome the news of Russia’s decision to recognize the Donbass republics. On Feb. 22, SANA reported, Deputy Foreign Minister Dr. Bashar al-Jaafari affirmed that Syria “supports Russia’s recognition of the independence of the Donetsk and Lugansk republics, indicating that it had expressed its willingness two months ago to work on building relations with the two republics in the context of common interests.”

In an interview, al-Jaafari said: “The question is whether or not the United States will succeed in imposing a unipolar regime on all countries of the world, including Russia and China. That is, the issue is related to geopolitics and not to politics in the simple sense of the word. Therefore, Syria is part of the scene, and China, Venezuela and Iran are part of this scene in the geopolitical sense.”

On Feb. 25, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad spoke with Russian President Putin to express his solidarity with the anti-fascist military operation and condemn the imperialists’ “dirty methods to support terrorists in Syria and Nazis in Ukraine.”

“President Assad stressed that what is happening today is a correction of history and a restoration of balance in the global order after the fall of the Soviet Union,” the Syrian government announced.

Assad also said that “Syria stands with the Russian Federation based on its conviction that its position is correct and because confronting NATO expansionism is Russia’s right.”

Iran

On March 1, Iran’s religious leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei blamed the U.S. for the crisis in Ukraine, saying the Islamic Republic of Iran has always opposed war and destruction anywhere in the world.

“The U.S. disrupted the stability of the country by interfering in its affairs and organizing rallies and creating a color coup,” Khamenei explained. “We oppose the killing of people and the destruction of the infrastructure of nations.

“If the people of Ukraine had been involved, the Ukrainian government wouldn’t be in this situation. The people didn’t get involved because they didn’t approve of the government,” he said.

“The American regime is a perfect example of modern ignorance. This regime is a crisis-producing and crisis-consuming regime, and it feeds off creating crises in the world.”

According to Press TV, “As an example, the leader pointed to the U.S. formation of the Daesh Takfiri terrorist group, denouncing Washington for plundering oil resources in eastern Syria, stealing Afghanistan’s assets, and supporting Israeli crimes against Palestinians.

“The leader then pointed to the West’s double standards in dealing with the crisis in Ukraine, stating that Western countries support the killing of Yemeni people in the Saudi war, but they call for an end to the Ukraine crisis.”

“If the United States fails to create a crisis, the arms factories will not be able to make the most of it,” Khamenei said. “They have to create crises in order to maximize the interests of these mafias.”

Turkish movements

Turkey’s repressive government, a NATO member, has been waging war on Syria. It is also arming Ukraine with deadly drones and threatens to block Russian access to the Black Sea by closing the Dardanelles Strait.

The revolutionary music group Grup Yorum has suffered greatly from repression by Turkey’s government. Not only is it banned from giving concerts, but several members are imprisoned, and some have died after torture and hunger strikes.

At a news conference in Moscow Feb. 21, visiting members of Grup Yorum declared their support for the people of Donbass in their fight against NATO imperialism and the far-right Ukrainian regime. Members said they would like to perform a solidarity concert there again, as they did in 2015.

The group opened its concert in Moscow Feb. 24 with these words: “We support the struggle of the people of Donbass against U.S. imperialism, against NATO, and against the fascist Ukrainian government. … Even a rock thrown against imperialism is a forward action for the people.”

The Communist Labor Party of Turkey/Leninist announced Feb. 24: “Our party, TKEP/Leninist, calls on all revolutionary, communist and progressive forces and the working class and oppressed peoples of the world to support both of these People’s Republics [Donetsk and Lugansk.] …

“The fact that the bourgeois government of Russia has been forced to support the People’s Republics because of its national interests should not be cause for hesitation. Imperialist apologists in Turkey and around the world have, either using Russia as an excuse or with empty words, abandoned this internationalist duty and argued for remaining neutral.

“In fact, as a necessary outcome of its own national interests, Russia has supported socialist, popular governments in countries like Cuba, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and Nicaragua against U.S. imperialism, acting as a shield, so to speak.

“If this operation … against Ukrainian fascism and which boldly challenges U.S., British, and German imperialism is victorious, it will be an enormous source of morale and embolden the working class and the oppressed and exploited working peoples of the world.”

Actions in support of Russia’s recognition of the Donbass republics and the joint military operation have been held by movements in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Italy and Serbia.

Image
Car rally in the Democratic Republic of Congo in solidarity with Donbass and Russia, Feb. 22. Photo: Lugansk Information Center

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2022/ ... nd-russia/

*****************************************************

Is Russia imperialist?
March 2, 2022 Gary Wilson

Image

For socialists, the fundamental understanding of imperialism goes back to World War I and is found in the pamphlet written by V.I. Lenin, “Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism.”

Imperialism is not a policy chosen by one government and dropped by another. Imperialism is a system.

The first world war was the outcome of imperialism, Lenin wrote, an imperialist war waged for the political and economic exploitation of the world, export markets, sources of raw material, spheres of capital investment, etc. The imperialist powers raised huge armies and navies, not only to forcibly subjugate oppressed people in the colonies, but to make war against other imperialist countries competing for control.

According to Lenin, the world was already divided among the great capitalist powers when he wrote “Imperialism” in 1916. The war resulted from inter-imperialist rivalries to redivide the world.

The wars since WWI have changed circumstances. And World War II signaled a turning point in world imperialist relations. The United States emerged from WWII as the world’s most powerful imperialist country, gaining control of former European empires in Asia and Africa.

The overturn of the socialist Soviet Union and the breakup of the Soviet republics into individual nation states was a dismantling of a planned economy, resulting in capitalist economies that are under-developed. There has not been a sudden, almost magical appearance of an imperialist Russia.

Lenin thought that there were a few characteristics of imperialism, including the rise of finance capital and the export of capital, not just commodities. The U.S., for example, exports not just commodities but capital — mostly in the form of loans or investments. U.S. banks are at the center of world commerce.

Russia’s economy almost neocolonial

Today, capitalist Russia’s GDP is smaller than that of South Korea or India. Russia’s economy is almost neocolonial, dependent on the exchange of raw materials such as oil and ores. This is the classic economic relationship of a colony to imperialist finance capital. In the list of the top 50 banks in the world, not one is Russian. The ruble is not a currency of trade. Russia does not export capital.

During the Soviet period, Russia and the other republics that formed the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics made remarkable industrial progress. Indeed, between 1921 and 1988 there were no years of negative economic growth — no recessions — except for the World War II years.

The Soviet economy fell into recession only in 1989 as the Gorbachev government began to dismantle the planned economy.

Under Gorbachev and then even more drastically under the openly anti-communist, anti-socialist government of Boris Yeltsin in the Russian Federal Republic, and in the new non-Russian former Soviet republics including Ukraine, socialist industry was dismantled.

Yeltsin finished the job of dismantling the Soviet economy that Gorbachev began. The years of Yeltsin are now remembered as perhaps the worst period in Russia’s 1,000-year history. This was the greatest economic disaster any country has seen in modern times, in war or peace.

Ukraine had the second-largest economy in the USSR. “Independent” Ukraine is now the poorest country in Europe. By the end of 2020, some 45% of the population were in the poor category, according to a study by the Ptukha Institute. The deep poverty has created the conditions for fascist gangs to emerge.

Putin’s role

Putin, who was Yeltsin’s prime minister and chosen successor, took a more protectionist direction, unlike Yeltsin and Gorbachev, who had fawned on the West.

Does that mean Putin moved away from the policies of Yeltsin and Gorbachev that had oriented the economy to exporting raw materials? Did Putin adopt a policy of industrialization?

Under Putin, there has been little growth of Russia’s manufacturing production that had been demolished by the “perestroika” reforms. Manufacturing is the foundation of any successful modern economy. Yet, under Putin, Russia continues mainly as an exporter of raw materials.

Russia now accounts for about 6% of the global aluminum supply, 3.5% of the copper supply, and 4% of the cobalt supply. And Russia is the world’s largest producer of crude oil and second-largest producer of dry natural gas, after the U.S.

Russia is in the top 10 exporters of grain crops, including barley, corn, rye, oats and especially wheat. From 2017-2019, it was the biggest exporter of wheat, accounting for about 20% of the world market.

Russia is a capitalist state, but that does not make it imperialist. Not all capitalist countries are imperialist nations. For example, Mexico is a capitalist country with an economy that’s similar in size to Russia’s, but is Mexico an imperialist country or an exploited country? Saying that it is capitalist is not enough to know the answer.

Lenin named at least four characteristics of imperialism: concentration of production into monopoly; merging of bank capital with industrial capital, creating finance capital; the export of capital; the fusion of finance capital and the state.

The role of finance capital may be most important. The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have taken over the economies of the world. The dollar (not gold) is the currency of world trade. Today almost every country is capitalist, and most of those are exploited by imperialism, by finance capital.

Mexico is capitalist but it is not imperialist. Russia, too, is an exploited country in relation to imperialism, like Mexico.

NATO targets Russia

Russia is the primary provider of gas and oil to much of Europe. The European Union imports 40% of its gas from Russia. That’s put Russia in competition with the U.S., the biggest producer of gas in the world.

The U.S. has been on a drive to control the world market in oil and gas. This can be seen in its attacks, actually acts of war (sanctions), against Iran and Venezuela as well as its war on Iraq. These are countries that had sought national sovereignty over oil and gas.

Russia, too, has been a target, especially its Nord Stream 2 pipeline, but not just for that.

Look at a map of NATO’s expansion since the breakup of the USSR. The countries put under NATO include Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria.

In 2008, NATO put the inclusion of Ukraine and Georgia, both bordering Russia, on the table.

NATO war on Yugoslavia

Despite the war propaganda that’s presented as news these days, the first war in Europe since World War II didn’t just start. That war was launched by the U.S. and NATO against Yugoslavia in 1999.

For 78 days, from March 24 to June 10, 1999, NATO bombers hit Belgrade, Pristina in Kosovo, Podgorica in Montenegro and several other cities. On the first day more than 20 buildings in Belgrade were leveled.

Much of the U.S./NATO bombing hit civilian targets. A passenger train was bombed. Cruise missiles could be seen flying down the streets. The U.S. directly bombed the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Belgrade, killing three Chinese reporters.

Russia understood the lesson of Yugoslavia and told the U.S. and NATO “no” to expansion to Ukraine and Georgia, on Russia’s borders – 10 minutes by missile to Moscow.

The former U.S. ambassador to Russia, William J. Burns, who is now director of the CIA, said in a February 2008 embassy cable that Ukraine joining NATO constituted a security threat for Russia. Burns noted that to push for this “could potentially split the country [Ukraine] in two, leading to violence or even, some claim, civil war, which would force Russia to decide whether to intervene.”

The U.S. never withdrew the proposal to include Ukraine.

Maidan coup

In Ukraine, the so-called Maidan coup in 2014 that was openly supported and financed by NATO put in a government that made NATO membership a policy mandate. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly requested Ukraine’s entrance into NATO. On Feb. 19, Zelensky demanded, once again, entry to NATO, saying, “Eight years ago, Ukrainians made their choice [the Maidan coup].”

Actually, many Ukrainians resisted the Maidan coup, particularly in the working class. In the Maidan civil war, fascist gangs emerged as a force for the coup. Resistance to the coup was strongest in the eastern section of the country. In Odessa, a neo-nazi pro-Maidan gang targeted the Odessa House of Trade Unions, near the center of the resistance. The building was firebombed and at least 46 anti-fascists and labor activists were burned alive.

The resistance to the Maidan coup has continued from 2014 to today. The independent Donetsk People’s Republic and Lugansk People’s Republic were created when the people there voted overwhelmingly (89% and 96%) to secede from the Maidan regime. They have been subjected to continuous attack since then, particularly by the Ukrainian National Guard’s Azov regiment, a neo-nazi stormtrooper-like operation. More than 14,000 have been killed in Ukraine’s war on Donetsk and Lugansk.

As U.S. Ambassador Burns predicted, Russia was pushed into a corner by the unrelenting drive for NATO entry to Ukraine as well as the growing buildup of neo-nazi militias and the war on Donetsk and Lugansk. Ukraine had promised in the Minsk agreements it signed in 2014 and 2015 there would be a ceasefire, an end to all fighting, withdrawal of heavy weapons, release of prisoners of war, and the recognition of self-government in Donetsk and Lugansk. Ukraine fulfilled none of these promises.

Putin may not be an anti-imperialist leader, but the Russian military operation to “demilitarize and denazify” Ukraine and recognize the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Lugansk People’s Republic is a move against imperialism, U.S. and NATO imperialism.

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2022/ ... perialist/

***********************************************

U.S. has its knee to the neck of Europe in the form of NATO: an interview 1 March with Radio Belarus
gilbertdoctorow Uncategorized March 2, 2022 3 Minutes

I offer visitors to my website the link to yesterday’s 20 minute video interview with the Belarus radio and television broadcaster.



This chat dealt with issues raised in my latest written report on Day Five of Russia’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine, but it went further to probe the reasons why America’s success in provoking Russia to engage in a war with Ukraine will likely not achieve its intended purpose of burying talk of a revised security architecture in Europe. On the contrary, both sides, the U.S.-led West and Russia, are escalating their aggressiveness precisely because the struggle is, in the last analysis, about expanding and enhancing NATO or smashing it to pieces. Ukraine just happens to be the field of combat for this historic struggle that will shape the world order for decades to come.

The murder in the U.S. of George Floyd gave momentum to the Black Lives Matter movement and also provided an image that captured the imagination of the nation and the world: the knee on the neck of a prone victim. That image is entirely appropriate to describe the essential nature of the NATO alliance and of the European Union, which NATO has de facto taken hostage. It is absolutely stunning to witness how in the days since Russia launched its ‘Special Military Operation’ in Ukraine the whole of Europe has snapped to attention and is doing its very best to implement the orders coming from Washington.

Should the Russians succeed in their mission in Ukraine and continue on their way in the face of the ‘nuclear bomb’ economic sanctions that Washington and Brussels have directed at Moscow, the whole NATO alliance will appear to be a sham, and the security umbrella of Washington will be blown inside out by gale force winds.

I call attention to the fact that until now the Russians have not responded to the latest waves of sanctions apart from their closing their air space to all nations that have shut out Russian airlines, meaning the entire EU. However, the freezing of Bank of Russia assets in the West remains without a response, as does the partial exclusion from SWIFT. This is not for lack of options on the Russian side to inflict extreme pain on the West. The confiscation of all Western corporate assets in Russia would largely balance the frozen Russian assets in the West. The shut-off of gas and oil supplies, of uranium for French and other European power plants, and of still other essential raw materials that are largely or even exclusively sourced in Russia would be very damaging to the European economies. None of this has been done because the Russians expect to finish up their business in Ukraine rather soon, and then to negotiate a gradual return to normality with the West.

Fortunately such colossal confrontations as we are now witnessing come along once in several generations. Let us hope that this one will end sooner rather than later, and will see us all through safe and sound to a new world order that is better balanced and just than the one that we have known till now.

*****

These are busy days for Russia specialists, I am sad to say. My ongoing vacation in the Lisbon area has not provided the rest and battery recharge it was supposed to do because of a flow of demands from broadcasters and others to grant extensive interviews or to participate in panel discussions of the Ukraine-Russia crisis.

In this connection, I close this note with mention of the podcast chat with me that Tom Woods released on the internet a day ago: https://tomwoods.com/ep-2074-russia-ukraine-and-nato/

The podcast is well over an hour long, which made it possible to go into the history of the present conflict in and over Ukraine in some depth. I hope listeners will find it especially informative.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2022

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2022/03/02/ ... o-belarus/

***********************************

EUROPE PUTS THE NOOSE AROUND ITS NECK IN THE ENERGY WAR AGAINST RUSSIA
1 Mar 2022 , 9:42 am .

Image
In this photo from February 2015, an engineer checks the gas distribution network in Beregdaroc, Hungary, one of the passage points for Russian gas to the European Union (Photo: Laszlo Balogh / Reuters)

It is known that the Russian contribution to gas consumption in Europe is significant and that it is of an increasing nature. To date , Russia supplies 40% to that continent. The United States Energy Information Administration (EIA) indicated this in a review of the behavior of this resource at the beginning of February, namely:

In 2020, natural gas imports by both pipeline and liquefied natural gas (LNG) provided more than 80% of natural gas supply to countries in the European Union and the United Kingdom. A decade before, there was talk of 65%, with Russia being the region's largest supplier.
Pipeline imports from Russia grew from about 11 billion cubic feet per day in 2010 to more than 13 billion cubic feet in 2020.
From 2010 to 2020, natural gas production in the European Union (EU) countries and the United Kingdom fell by more than 50%, from the equivalent of 18 billion cubic feet per day in 2010 to 9 billion cubic feet per day in 2020. This decrease is the result of the depletion of own resources in those countries. This is the alarming data of energy dependency.
In addition, these data are in line with those managed by the Norwegian energy analysis company, Rystad Energy, which estimates that the total supply from Russia to Europe is approximately 150 billion cubic meters to 190 billion cubic meters, while that through the Ukraine or other routes barely 52 billion cubic meters of gas are registered per year to the European continent.

This chart from the European Network of Gas Transmission System Operators ( ENSTSOG ) reflects the importance of the gas supply boom from Nord Stream I alone, hopefully we'll see this chart when it's added (if ever). , eventually) the Nord Stream II.(see link)


And if there is still doubt that the gas variable is a fundamental part of the current geopolitical scenario, the following EIA map shows the extensive network of gas pipelines that connect Russia (blue) with the rest of the European countries dependent on this important energy resource. The issue of energy dependence is not that it has become relevant again: it has always been there. (see link)
Again taking the year 2020 as a reference, with the onslaught of covid-19, which is saying a lot, the Russian gas company Gazprom for that year recorded that the Western European market consumes most of Russian exports, being the largest importers: Germany, Italy, Austria, Turkey and France. This totaled more than 130 million cubic meters of gas to Europe.(see link)

Given the rounds of "sanctions" on the Russian financial and economic system by the United States, accompanied by the European Commission, France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom and Canada, which later escalated to the unilateral announcement of expelling some Russian banks from the SWIFT financial communications, the company Gazprom makes an announcement expected by few: "Requests have been 83 million cubic meters per day as of February 24, 31.4% more than on February 23", that is to say, that the Russian gas exports through Ukraine continue as normal.

With these facts, the European gas companies quickly began to buy more natural gas, being a common behavior in the market in light of the possibility that there could be an interruption in energy flows or more price hikes.(see link)

Some oil analysts believe that the commodity markets have not reacted as they have in the past to eventualities similar to those of today, in other words, they believe that prices are not as high as they probably should be. The British oil company BP reports this week that it will abandon its 19.75% stake in the Russian oil company Rosneft. This did not cause the oil and energy market to collapse either.

But, broadly speaking, this is due both to the preparation of the Russian government for this scenario in the context of containing the impacts that the Western axis sought to achieve, and to the hesitation of the large gas importers.

After that predictable announcement that includes some doubts about its application, the web portal of the Spanish newspaper El País published that "the disconnection will not be total, since it is sought to continue allowing the payment of hydrocarbons." Like what was said by a representative of the US administration, which with Russia's disconnection from SWIFT emphasizes that it may not affect the Russian banks through which payments for energy supplies are made, because it is proposed to develop a list of Russian banks that will be disconnected from SWIFT, taking into account that those through which payments related to energy carriers do not pass will be selected: this is geopolitical survival.

Of course, after observing the figures of the enormous flow of energy that passes through the different Russian gas pipelines to Europe, it is extremely complex that the Europeans shoot themselves immediately without having real alternatives that can replace the supply of Russian gas. So for convenience they shout in the rogue media the expulsion of the SWIFT system without reading the fine print.

FOR EUROPE, ARE THERE BETTER OPTIONS THAN RUSSIAN GAS?

The president of the European Commission, Ursula Von Der Leyen, said through her official Twitter account that this week the European bloc will target "sanctions" on Russia's energy sector through an export ban that prevents European companies send technology to Russia that it needs to improve its refineries.

On the other hand, keeping the same political line, the US Treasury Department reported that it will greatly restrict Gazprom's ability to raise money for projects from the US market.

However, there are factors to consider in these energy dynamics between Europe and Russia:

Groningen. Natural gas production in Europe has decreased in recent years as gas fields in the North Sea have been depleted. A recent example was what happened with the gas fields of Groningen, the province that houses the largest gas deposit in the EU in the Netherlands, since, since the end of the 1980s, earthquakes began to be generated in that area caused by by underground vacuum pockets. Later, in 2015, the government of that kingdom established a reduction in the exploitation of these fields due to the constant earthquakes that caused damage to the infrastructure and buildings of Groningen.

In 2018, that government decides to reduce gas productionin Groningen to 12 billion cubic meters per year by 2022 with the goal of reaching zero before 2030. This decision marked a turning point in the energy plans of the Netherlands .

This year, despite knowing the risks and instability involved in gas extraction practices in that area, the Dutch government decides to double gas production in this field. At the beginning it was estimated 3.9 million cubic meters and now they want to take it up to 7 thousand 600 million cubic meters .In this regard, the Ministry of Economic Affairs of that country argued that this measure consists of advancing energy security and that it would supposedly last until mid-2022, so it is not a long-term measure but rather a desperate emergency.
United States. It is always presented as a possible option to increase natural gas imports to Europe. But the big drawback, apart from how difficult it is to supply Europe at current levels of consumption, is that the United States has been and will continue to be an importer of natural gas , since part of that gas is extracted with shale oil , leading to the depletion of piggyback wells.
Qatar. The Arab country is one of the main gas exporters. But with respect to Europe, it must be considered that natural gas is expensive to transport, so if it is exported, it tends to be exported mainly to nearby countries. Another point of advantage for the connection of Russia with the European continent.

Added to that, this week the Qatari Energy Minister, Saad al-Kaabi, commented that it is impossible for any country to completely replace Russian gas in Europe, since most of the liquefied natural gas is tied to existing contracts. According to the official, only 10-15% of Qatar's supply could be diverted to Europe.
Although Europe hopes that the short-term solution is to rely on gas supplies from the United States and Qatar, this would not be enough because the needs of the European continent would not be covered. So immediately implementing alternatives to Russian gas is unfeasible.

It is expected that this March 2 high-level EU officials will unveil the plan or strategy to reduce dependence on Russian energy as quickly as possible, also adding the goal of reducing the use of fossil fuels by 40% to 2030.

However, prior to exposing that plan, it is necessary to add that in 2020 wind energy represented 3% of the world's total energy consumption and solar represented 1% of total energy, in relation to other types of energy. . It is clear that there is a long way to go for the arrival of "green energy" or that the threats of the United States and the EU against Russia have an expiration date soon. Europe has much to lose, deepening its vassal condition with respect to the interests of the Anglo-Atlantic empire in decline.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/eu ... ntra-rusia
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Wed Mar 02, 2022 11:30 pm

Briefly about Ukraine. 03/02/2022
March 2, 19:47


Image

1. Mariupol. The city is blocked. Fighting on the outskirts. There is no direct assault yet. They are still trying to negotiate the withdrawal of civilians, but the Nazis will not refuse a human shield. There will be a storm one way or another.

2. Volnovakha. Surrounded. The stripping process is not fully captured yet. The enemy has very heavy losses,

3. Position near Donetsk. The attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (sally) on Gorlovka did not give any results, both sides suffered losses. The shelling of the territory of the DPR continues.

4. The liberation of the republic continues in the LPR. Svatovo and Novoaidar were liberated. The enemy retreats, abandoning the technique. It will be kept only in Severodonetsk and Lisichansk, but they have already begun to process it there.

5. RF Armed Forces have occupied Balakleya and are moving towards Izyum. And there and Slavyansk not far. It is very likely that in the coming days, part of the forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine that remained in the northern regions of the LPR and did not have time to retreat will be surrounded and liquidated.

6. Kharkov. The RF Armed Forces are already kept in semi-coverage. Fighting on the outskirts. In the city - the methodical destruction of enemy manpower and its organizational and command structure. Along the way, they continue to finish off the remaining military facilities.

7. RF Armed Forces approached Brovary. There is no direct assault yet. Battles near Chernigov, measures to establish full control over Konotop. Trostyanets is fully occupied. Sumy and Akhtyrka are still not completely controlled.

8. To the west of Kyiv, positional battles - the RF Armed Forces are pulling up additional forces. There are losses in equipment on both sides.

9. Zaporozhye direction. Battles near Vasilievka. Armed Forces of Ukraine are constantly pouring into the village. Energodar has not yet carried out a cleansing operation.

10. Kherson. The city was occupied at night by the troops of the RF Armed Forces. The local authorities eventually agreed. The city is relatively calm.

11. In the region of Nikolaev, fighting continues to block the city, which has not yet been achieved. The situation in the area of ​​the Nikolaev-Krivoy Rog highway is unclear. Helicopter landing in the area of ​​Nikolaev. One of the bridges was blown up near Voznesensk.

12. No one landed in Odessa as usual. In the morning, Russian ships appeared on the horizon, then they withdrew. Beyond the horizon, something smoked. Perhaps there was another naval battle with the remaining boats of the Ukrainian Navy, which, after the battle at Zmeiny, went to Odessa. (later it turned out that a foreign cargo ship was smoking, something might have arrived) So far, there are no details. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine asks Zelensky to achieve a pause in hostilities, since the city is not covered from the land direction and is not ready to repel the attack of Russian columns bypassing Nikolaev from the north.

From a completely fresh, completely wild story in Vasilkovo, where the local Volkssturm staged a massacre at a local school. 4 Volkssturmists killed 14 other Volkssturmists, policemen and civilians. Ukropropaganda hastened to announce that they were "Russian saboteurs" who rushed into the basement of the school (yes, everything happened at the school), where there were 300 children, protecting whom all these idiots died. This is what giving out weapons to random people leads to. Yesterday, in the same area, Volkssturmists looted 2 collection vehicles.
In this case, Russian propaganda doesn’t even need to try, just show yourself this bloody trash, which says a lot about the Volkssturm and those who created it in this form.

PS. Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine will be held tomorrow in Belovezhskaya Pushcha.
Lavrov outlined the negotiating position of the Russian Federation:

⚡️I do not rule out that someone wanted Russia to get bogged down in a man-made, Western-created conflict in Ukraine.

⚡️Russian demands on Ukraine cannot be qualified as its surrender, Moscow offers to negotiate

⚡️. we will find an opportunity to develop

⚡️The task of the operation in Ukraine is to identify specific types of strike weapons that will never be deployed there

⚡️After the end of the conflict, the Ukrainians themselves must decide how to live on

⚡️Kiev does not yet confirm the holding of the second round of consultations with the Russian Federation

⚡️NATO is trying to involve neutral countries - members of the European Union to meet its needs

⚡️, Moscow is amazed at Berlin's comments on Ukraine and on arms supplies

⚡️Russia during the second round of negotiations with Ukraine is ready to discuss the issue of security guarantees

⚡️Zelensky came to power under the slogans of peace, in the end he became a Russophobe, like the

⚡️Poroshenko

⚡️government “handles” in the current situation

⚡️The current situation has developed due to the fact that the West refused to recognize equal rights for the Russian Federation in the organization of the European security architecture The parameters of the demilitarization

⚡️of Ukraine have yet to be agreed including on the arrest of assets of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, he did not give a damn about all his principles

⚡️

⚡️

⚡️The purpose of the ongoing operation of the Russian Federation in Ukraine is to protect people, primarily in the Donbass

⚡️Russia is now observing “information terrorism” with the stuffing of millions of fakes that Moscow exposes

⚡️Russia’s position in negotiations with Ukraine: Crimea is part of the Russian Federation, recognition of the DPR and LPR within administrative boundaries, demilitarization, which must have certain parameters

⚡️Ukraine must undergo a denazification procedure, as Germany did in the past

⚡️During the special operation, we are doing everything to prevent any serious casualties among the civilian population

⚡️Russia cannot watch participants marching in modern Europe under fascist, neo-Nazi banners torchlight processions

⚡️Russia offers Ukraine an agreement that will ensure the legal rights of all the peoples of this country.

In fact, these are all the same requirements as at the beginning of the operation. Ukrainian sources claim that by March 2, Zelensky was already ready to recognize Crimea and the LDNR within the borders before the start of the operation. But of course this will not suit the Russian Federation, the game is not worth the candle. Incurring significant costs for the operation and from sanctions pressure, from the situation in Ukraine, it is necessary to take the maximum possible result.

UPD: The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation has officially announced the losses in Ukraine since the beginning of the operation.

The RF Armed Forces have 498 killed. The Armed Forces of Ukraine - 2870 killed and 3700 wounded.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin - broadcast in Ukraine continues as usual here

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7472087.html

Google Translator

*****************************************************

Disarming Ukraine - Day 7

The crisis, and especially the reaction of the 'west' to it, is much worse than I had feared.

The U.S. government and 'western' media claim that the World condemns Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

That is however far from reality. It is only true if true if you believe 'the world' solely exists of the 5-eye spying cooperation (U.S., UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), the European Union, Switzerland, Japan and Singapore.

The view differs when you zoom out.

The much bigger 'rest of the world' has not condemned Russia but understands how the conflict came about. They blame, like political scientist John Mearsheimer, the U.S. for causing the crisis. This includes, as far as I can tell, all of Africa (54 states), South America, Central America, the Middle East, and all of Asia ex Japan and Singapore.

This rest of the world that did not condemn Russia includes several notable U.S. allies and 'partners' like Turkey (Nato's second biggest army!), India, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Israel.

The case shows how much the standing of the once unilateral superpower has been diminished.

Since 2014 the war in east Ukraine against the people of the Donbas regions has cost more than 14,000 lives. Some 10,000 of those were civilians on the Donbas side. The dying there continues as the Ukrainian army and its nazi battalions continue to shell the cities of Donetzk and Luhansk:

At least 136 civilians have been killed, including 13 children, and 400 have been injured since Russia invaded Ukraine last week, a United Nations agency said on Tuesday.
"The real toll is likely to be much higher," Liz Throssell, a spokesperson for the U.N. human rights office (OHCHR), told a briefing, adding that 253 of the casualties were in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine.

Over the last days I also read several commentators claiming that that the Russian 'regime change' incursion into Ukraine would not have the support of the Russian people and would set them up against their president. Here is news for them:

Maxim A. Suchkov @m_suchkov - 19:14 UTC · Mar 1, 2022
Meanwhile #Putin's approval rating has raised from 60% to 71% (survey by FOM)

Image

The sanctions put up against Russia will hurt its people. But due to global price increases they will be probably felt stronger in Europe and the United States and they may even cause mass starvation and revolutions in poorer countries of the 'third world'.

Mark Sleboda has served as nuclear engineer in the U.S. Navy. He has studied at the London School of Economics. He has married a woman from Crimea and now lives in Moscow as a Russian citizen. He is a frequent commentator in Russian media. Sleboda has previously criticized president Putin for being too soft with the 'west'.

His analyses and predictions are more dire than mine but he is probably right (thread edited for readability):

Mark Sleboda @MarkSleboda1 - 8:53 UTC · Mar 2, 2022
This is #theGreatDecoupling between the West and Russia. Economic linkages will be cut down to only energy and a few other commodities & chemicals that Europe is dependent on Russia for. The West controls and has weaponized their entire economy in their war to break Russia.

Political, social and cultural linkages will also be severed to a high degree. Weaning Russia off this dependence will be hard and immiserating. But with Chinese and some other Eurasian support, Russia may just weather it. The entire global economy will suffer as well.

But once the dust has settled and new domestic and import substitution formed - Russia will at least be economically & financially independent from the West. They will never again be able to weaponize their economic hegemony to coerce, blackmail, or wage war on Russia.

The same weaponized economic war too will also soon be turned on China and the Rest of the world's holdouts from US-led Western Hegemony. The Unipolar world will truly be over, but the Multipolar world will be stillborn by US attempts to hang on to their hegemony. Instead US/Western pressure will directly result in the formation of an anti-Western bloc led by China and Russia for survival and independence. Neutrality will be difficult to maintain. A new Bipolar world is coming into being, just decades after the last ended.

The Golden Age of the Global Internet is also now over resulting not from Russia closing itself off, but by censorship and exclusion by Western and the social media platforms and the internet fixtures they control - because they don't trust their own people to hear alternative perspectives and narratives and judge on their own. The world's internet will now break down into regional spheres with limited connectivity. It will be a new, much smaller, less connected, more localized and divisive world.

We are of course already seeing the physical connections around the world break down - with closures of entire swathes of the globe's surface to each others' airlines and global shipping connections being severed one by one as we speak. Global distribution networks will be disrupted & chaos result for months. Because Russia & Ukraine are primary sources of so many of the world's commodities - energy & food costs around the world will skyrocket. In the First world prices will go up, in the Third - starvation.

Ultimately the cause was the US-led West trying to maintain and extend their Hegemony, while they can and Russia resisting it. NATO expansion east in waves, US meddling and hybrid warfare to bring into power pro-Western/anti-Russian governments in formerly neutral, unaligned, national identity-divided post Soviet states was the endgame of this NATO expansion to geopolitically consolidate all of Europe under US-led Western Hegemony up to Russia's borders.

Russia resisted this geopolitical flipping by color revolution in Georgia, Belarus & Ukraine. And now the ultimate target of this economic war on Russia is forcing regime change in Russia itself for having the temerity to resist the Hegemon's geopolitical expansion right on her very borders.

The great Realist IR scholar Mearsheimer foresaw all of this. As did Kissinger, George Kennan, US Ambassador John Matlock and many others. They tried to warn what the consequences of the US trying to geopolitically flip Ukraine would be, but to no avail.

For Russia the only path forward, the goal to survive is, must be - separation, autarky (self-sufficiency), and independence from US-led Western Hegemony.


Posted by b on March 2, 2022 at 14:46 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/03/d ... .html#more

***************************************************

Porsche stops production in Leipzig
by MDR SAXONY

Stand: 02. March 2022, 12:39 p.m.

The car manufacturer Porsche interrupts production at its plant in Leipzig due to delivery bottlenecks. According to industry circles, the background is the war in Ukraine. Porsche has previously obtained cable harnesses from there. Previously, VW had temporarily stopped production at its plants in Zwickau and Dresden. BMW is also considering stopping production.

Due to delivery bottlenecks, Porsche wants to interrupt the construction of cars at the Leipzig plant. The factory was forced to suspend production from Wednesday afternoon until the end of next week, a spokesman said on Wednesday. The Macan and Panamera models are built there. Short-time work will be applied for for the 2,500 employees affected.

Harnesses from Western Ukraine

In Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen, where the Taycan and the 911 are built, production will continue this week, according to the announcement. "The further steps will be taken in an orderly process. In the coming days and weeks we will drive on sight and continuously reassess the situation." According to information from industry circles, the Volkswagen subsidiary Porsche has so far obtained cable harnesses from western Ukraine.

VW and BMW are also affected

Due to supply bottlenecks, VW has already temporarily stopped production at its plants in Zwickau and Dresden. BMW had also announced that there could be production interruptions due to the war in Ukraine, but had not yet named any specific plants.

https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen/ ... g-100.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Thu Mar 03, 2022 1:10 pm

TYCOONS, FAKES, CENSORSHIP AND MERCENARIES
THE AXES OF THE PRIVATIZATION OF THE WAR THAT INFLUENCE UKRAINE
2 Mar 2022 , 7:02 am .

Image
War as a privatized global business outlines its most characteristic features in Ukraine (Photo: dimj- stock . adobe . com )

The military actions carried out by the Russian Federation in Ukraine since February 24 have been the consequence of an instability created since 2014 when the "international community" validated a coup d'état that imposed a government system tolerant of pro-Nazi political movements such as the Right Sector and its armed wing, the Azov Battalion.

The extractive interests around the Donbás distorted the development of political events and the global media participated in the concealment of the military and economic siege carried out by fascist sectors closely linked to Washington.

What has happened in recent days allows us to witness the model of dispute over power that is imposed by the Atlanticist elites, in which corporate interference in military affairs of different degrees converges. From methods of neoliberal privatization of war to the communicational hegemony that is imposed through social networks and their attacks of global censorship.

Here are three samples in progress.

ELON MUSK, MARSHAL AND WOLF OF TWITTER
The Ukrainian government received last Monday, February 28, a shipment of antennas to receive Internet via satellite from the Starlink constellation. The gift was given to the Kiev regime by Elon Musk, CEO of the SpaceX company, which has created the constellation of satellites to launch Internet coverage that aims to cover the entire planet.


In 2021, the number of satellites launched by the tycoon would have exceeded 2,000 and they communicate with terrestrial transceivers like the ones donated. SpaceX has permission from US authorities to send up to 12,000 satellites in total, and according to the recent February update, the beta internet service is available in 29 countries.

Recently 40 of the 49 Starlink satellites launched at the beginning of last month disintegrated as they left orbit due to a geomagnetic storm . According to estimates, each satellite costs SpaceX $250,000 to build and launch, meaning the storm could have cost the controversial tax mogul as much as $10 million .

Image
Elon Musk, the tycoon who reports just over 10% of the wealth he accumulates and intervenes in an armed conflict by sending satellite communication equipment (Photo: Samuel Corum / Bloomberg News)

Ukraine's Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov asked Musk for help via Twitter : "While you are trying to colonize Mars, Russia is trying to occupy Ukraine. While its rockets successfully land from space, Russian rockets attack the Ukrainian civilian population. We ask you to provide Ukraine with Starlink stations and turn to sane Russians to stand up."

Musk responded : "Starlink service is already active in Ukraine. More terminals on the way."

This American tycoon, who reports just over 10% of the wealth he hoards, has recently been investigated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) together with his brother Kimbal, after he sold a batch of Tesla stock for $108 million just one day before Elon launched a Twitter poll on whether he should sell 10% of his stock.

This occurred in November 2021 and the SEC is of the opinion that the brothers could have abused inside information because Kimbal is on the company's board of directors and Elon was able to inform his brother of the survey or his plans to sell shares. Under the sales rules, employees or members of the board of directors cannot trade the stock based on non-public data about the company.

BIG TECH, BETWEEN DISINFORMATION AND CENSORSHIP

Millions of messages, photos and videos about bombings, downed fighter planes or citizens who take refuge in their own homes, are images that are shared on social networks such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook or Telegram, and have become confused by Western sources to misinform and provoke extreme outrage.


However, Facebook censored Zvezda, RIA Nóvosti, Lenta.ru and Gazeta.ru, all Russian media, the day the actions of the Russian Armed Forces began, accusing them of violating its regulations. It also labeled its materials as unreliable and placed technical restrictions on posting searches to narrow its audience.

The companies behind these networks have occupied an arbitral position that no legitimate power has conferred on them, but they also act as part of the conflict. To the point that the head of Facebook's Security Policy, Nathaniel Gleicher, declared that the company decided to ban Russian state media from advertising and monetizing on the platform, adding that the social network closely follows the development of the Russian military operation in Ukraine. .

"YouTube has blocked the Sputnik channel in Russian on the territory of Ukraine. Apparently, fake news is more welcome there," said a message from the Russian state media which Russia's media regulator Roskomnadzor told in a statement. November 2021 that since the previous year it had registered more than 50 acts of censorship of Russian media materials and their official accounts by foreign Internet platforms belonging to the so-called Big Tech.

privatewar002.jpg

Social networks and US government entities have been linked and accused of acting synergistically in the surveillance of many for the benefit of the few (Photo: File)
Likewise, false messages have been sent through Facebook, on behalf of the Russian media outlet RIA Nóvosti, urging opposition to Russia's special military operation that, according to its government, seeks to demilitarize Ukraine. The press service of the Rossiya Segodnya media group, to which Sputnik also belongs, issued a complaint stating:

"Facebook allows the distribution of false messages, while with regard to the Russian media, in particular RIA Nóvosti, it allows complaints without evidence about fakes. We qualify as unacceptable both the illegal use of the RIA Nóvosti brand and the collusion of such actions by the administration of the social network. Our lawyers are studying the possibility of taking legal action".

YouTube and Facebook also blocked several accounts linked to the Lugansk and Donetsk People's Republics on February 4, respectively with messages such as "It has been canceled for violating the YouTube community guidelines" or directly with the blocking of their pages.

Russian authorities have regarded such actions by Big Tech as "acts of censorship" that violate the key principles of the free flow of information and unhindered access to it. Roskomnadzor decided to slow down the traffic of the social network at the same time that the committee for the information of the Lower House of the Russian Parliament affirmed that the restrictions will be eliminated if Facebook unblocks the accounts of the media in question.

As evidenced, these large companies not only exercise the so-called " surveillance capitalism " at the level of substantial income while spying on the privacy of each user, but also as an active part of the media war and Western propaganda with which the perception is shaped. citizen in favor of certain geopolitical interests.

Image
The main companies that dominate the Internet (Photo: Visual Capitalist)

Last October, a report carried out by media such as CNN, The Associated Press , The Wall Street Journal , among others, concluded that Facebook prioritized its profits over its policies regarding security and truthfulness of information. There are also other indications such as the scandals by Cambridge Analytica , a corporation that created strategies and messages focused on changing the perception of users in the 2016 elections in the United States, the Brexit in the United Kingdom and the peace process in Colombia from of information obtained from Facebook profiles.

UKRAINE AS A LABORATORY FOR THE EXPANSION OF SECURITIZATION

Private Military Firms (PMF) are employers of armed guards, defense equipment supply companies, military trainers and consultants offering strategy coaching , which emerged after the end of the Cold War. Their presence exploded in the heat of the "counter-terrorist war" and the "preventive" military invasions.

They operate in combat or "humanitarian crisis" zones where violence may be imminent by selling their services to governments, large corporations, private companies or "humanitarian aid" agencies.

Some of the most lucrative businesses of these companies, which operate throughout the world thanks to contracts with States that delegate these tasks to them to cover up their militarist hegemony, are in wars, logistics, supply and internal security, but also in project protection. extractivists and custody of physical infrastructure.

Before February 24, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were massing troops in the Donbass region. The OSCE special monitoring mission in Ukraine reported units of the Ukrainian Army and National Guard: there were 150,000 soldiers, armed, trained and led by military advisers and instructors from the United States and NATO.

In 2020, the founder of the private military company Academi (formerly known as Blackwater), Erik Prince, proposed to the Kiev regime to send thousands of mercenaries from the United States and other countries to Ukraine and prepare them to launch an attack on the (now independent) republics. ) of the Donbas, as reported by the Russian aviation portal Avia.Pro .

Prince's plan consists, as Time magazine revealed last July, in investing 10 billion dollars to provide mercenaries to the CIA, the Pentagon and the State Department to participate in torture and murder. The private army would enter Ukraine through a partnership between Lancaster 6, a British company based in Dubai, to run secret operations in Europe, Russia and other regions. Lancaster 6 defines itself on its website as "(...) a group of passionate and highly experienced professionals who believe in the prosperity that peace generates."

The Ukrainian authorities are releasing military prisoners to participate in the battles against the Russian Armed Forces, including Semen Semenchenko ( or Konstantin Grishin ), former deputy of the Self-Help Party in the Rada of Ukraine and founder of the paramilitary group Donbass Battalion, who was put in prison on suspicion of being involved in the creation and supply of a private military company.

This operator has enjoyed the support of the powerful Ukrainian diaspora and US "democracy promotion" circles. He was feted in Washington in September 2014 at the International Republican Institute (where he wore a camouflage uniform), the International Democratic Institute, and other US government, quasi-government, and private institutions.

Image
Semén Semenchenko (on the right) being received by the promoter of global paramilitarization, the late John McCain (Photo: File)

The purpose of his trip was to secure funding for the training of Ukraine's volunteer battalions dominated by nationalist, ultra-nationalist and neo-fascist fighters. In October of that year, his Dombas Battalion was already receiving training from the US Army.

Semenchenko is credited with leading the neo-fascist unit that started the sniper massacre of February 20, 2014, in which the Western media managed to indict President Viktor Yanukovych and lead to his overthrow. It was a fundamental economic-political actor in the blockade of transport and trade with the Donbass and managed to intimidate the Poroshenko government by demanding, in violent demonstrations, that it end the truce with the autonomous republics, declare martial law and destroy the militias. or else they would remove him from power "like Yanukovych".

In February 2016, Semenchenko accused Petro Poroshenko of being among the corrupt oligarchs benefiting from the status quo of the Donbass conflict (which was no lie) and the government began to retaliate for his stance. He investigated him for illegally holding people, using forged documents and other unidentified crimes. Currently he has been released due to certain demands of his links in Washington to participate as a member of the paramilitary arm that Kiev has been using to carry out the dirty work of the Ukrainian military establishment against the civilian population.

The rearrangement that the current confrontation in Ukraine means also involves consolidating codes of war inherent in the logic of capitalism. The projection of the most extreme neoliberalism in the development of the Atlanticist strategy is its most evident mark.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/lo ... en-ucrania

Google Translator

Perhaps they should have mentioned that Semenchenko is a batshit insane Nazi, cause he is.

***************************************************

Lies of Omission

I was listening to this report on National Propaganda Radio yesterday evening and I had to turn off the radio.
Russia bombards a Kyiv TV tower and the Babyn Yar Holocaust memorial site
March 1, 20221:54 PM ET
RACHEL TREISMAN

Twitter

A fireman runs Tuesday after Russian airstrike hit Kyiv's main television tower in Kyiv in the heart of the Ukrainian capital.
Sergei Supinsky/AFP via Getty Images
Apparent Russian strikes have hit the main television and radio tower in Kyiv, as well as a memorial to the site where Nazis killed thousands of Jews during World War II. Ukraine's foreign ministry confirmed the attack in a tweet, in which it equated Russia with barbarism.

The State Emergency Service said five people were killed and another five injured in the attack on the Kyiv TV tower, according to Interfax. Citing the Ministry of Internal Affairs, it also reported that the broadcaster's control room was hit and TV channels will not work "for some time."

The ministry said backup broadcasting of some channels will be switched on in the near future, and the State Service for Special Communications and Information Protection is asking Kyiv residents to rely on regional TV channels until then.


Video verified by the New York Times shows an object hitting the tower, with another two explosions igniting in the same area and setting off billowing clouds of smoke. Similar videos, not yet verified by NPR, have been posted on social media.

The tower — which appears to still be standing — is located near the Babyn Yar Holocaust Memorial Center, where Nazis killed nearly 34,000 Jews over a 36-hour period in September 1941. The center says Nazis shot between 70,000 and 100,000 people at Babyn Yar, including nearly all of Kyiv's Jewish population, between 1941 and 1943.

It had issued a statement earlier Tuesday strongly condemning Russia's actions, characterizing them as a crime against humanity and calling Russia "the biggest instigator and initiator of war in the 21st century."

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy denounced the Russian strikes in a tweet in which he confirmed five people had been killed, but did not specify at which location.

"To the world: What is the point of saying never again for 80 years, if the world stays silent when a bomb drops on the same site of Babyn Yar?" he wrote. "History repeating..."

(more)

https://www.npr.org/2022/03/01/10837333 ... orial-site
"Nazis"... Who were these Nazis? Well, a good part of them, the 'grunts' and trigger-men, were Ukrainian auxiliaries, whose behavior was so vile that it repulsed even SS officers overseeing the massacre. The same bunch who formed a SS Division sporting the same insignia you see all over Ukraine today. The same bunch, who on the onset of war slaughtered thousand of Jews and Poles in their stronghold city of Lvov. The same bunch hailed as 'Heroes of Ukraine' today.

Inconvenient facts assiduously buried. I've known they were liars for years but this is obscene.

**********************************************************

LIVE: Ukrainian Officials Confirm Russia's Capture of Kherson

Image
barricades built in front of the regional state administration in Lviv, Ukraine 02 March 2022 | Photo: EFE/EPA/Vitaliy Hrabar

Published 2 March 2022 (12 hours 21 minutes ago)

Venezuela says despite sanctions it will maintain trade at all levels with Russia - Ecuadorian fish farmers expect a drop in shrimp sales to Russia and Ukraine due to conflict - the U.S. remains open to diplomacy with Russia, says Blinken - No-fly zone in Ukraine would draw U.S. into war with Russia, Pentagon says

00:00 EST:

Russian Duma proposes to introduce criminal liability for false news about Russian Army


Several Russian deputies submitted to the State Duma (lower house of the Russian Parliament) amendments on criminal liability for the deliberate spreading of false information about the actions of the Russian Armed Forces.

According to one of their authors, the head of the Duma for security, Vasily Piskariov, the creation and propagation of false information in this regard will be punishable by three years' imprisonment.

If a person commits these actions with the use of his official position or the Internet, he will face 5 to 10 years in prison, and if the publications have dangerous consequences for society, 15 years.


21:15 EST:

Ukrainian officials confirm fall of Kherson to Russian hands

Ukrainian officials on Wednesday night confirmed the Russian army's capture of Kherson, a port city of 290,000 inhabitants in the south of the country.

"The occupants are in all parts of the city and are very dangerous," the head of the regional administration, Gennady Lakhuta, said on Telegram. In the morning, Moscow had announced its control over this city.

21:00 EST:

U.S. remains open to diplomacy with Russia, says Blinken

The United States remains open to the diplomatic track with Russia in the framework of the conflict with Ukraine, the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Wednesday.

"The United States continues diplomatic efforts. We keep the doors open for a diplomatic path," Blinken told a press conference.


Uruguayan Press Association condemns suspension of Russian signal on state-owned platform

The Uruguayan Press Association (APU) expressed its concern Wednesday over the suspension of the Russian channel Russia Today (RT) from the streaming platform of the state-owned telephone company Antel.

"The CDC (Central Directive Council) of APU expresses its concern over the decision of Antel president Gabriel Gurméndez to remove RT (Russian signal) from the Vera TV grid and condemns the persecutory action of the social network Twitter against several journalists from Uruguay and the region," the organization wrote on its Twitter account.

In a statement, the APU considered "inadmissible this act of plain and simple state censorship of an international media outlet that disseminates information from one of the parties to the conflict in question."

"Beyond the government's position on the conflict, the State as such should not incur in a decision that directly affects the right of Uruguayan citizens to seek and receive information from all sources they deem relevant".

Prensa Latina denounces European censorship of RT and Sputnik as a threat to objectivity

The Latin American news agency Prensa Latina denounced on Wednesday that the censorship promoted by the European Union against the Russian media RT and Sputnik is an attack against informative objectivity and the rights of its professionals.

"The actions adopted in recent days by the EU bloc and digital platforms against these journalistic organizations move away from confronting false news and deprive objectivity in information," said Luis Enrique González, president of Prensa Latina.

González added that such boycott deprives audiences of access to alternative news and visions to those disseminated by Western information monopolies, at a time when the conflict in Ukraine is the focus of the world's attention.

19:30 EST:

No-fly zone in Ukraine would draw US into war with Russia, Pentagon says

Establishing a no-fly zone in Ukraine, as requested by the Kiev government, would draw the United States into a war with Russia, U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said Wednesday.

"(U.S.) President (Joe) Biden has been clear that U.S. troops will not fight Russia in Ukraine, and if a no-fly zone is established, surely for that no-fly zone to be enforced, you have to come into contact with Russian aircraft, and again, that would put us at war with Russia," Austin said in an interview with NBC.

19:00 EST:

Venezuela says despite sanctions it will maintain trade at all levels with Russia

Despite unilateral sanctions against Russia, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro said Wednesday that he will maintain trade exchanges at all levels with the Eurasian country.

"Modestly, Venezuela is going to maintain all its trade at all levels. The economic war is the main war that imperialism is waging against Russia to destroy it," the president said.

The Venezuelan president denounced the existence of an economic war against Russia with the aim of destroying it.

Ecuadorian fish farmers expect a drop in shrimp sales to Russia and Ukraine due to conflict

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine could slow down the external sales of Ecuadorian shrimp to those countries, said a leader of the aquaculture sector on Wednesday.

"In the coming weeks there will be a loss of profits because the shrimp sector exports more or less 12 million dollars a month to Russia," said the executive president of the National Chamber of Aquaculture of Ecuador, Jose Antonio Camposano, to the Teleamazonas television network.

The union leader expressed his concern about what might happen to the financial entities that can no longer make payments with the Swift system, the payment platform that connects some 11,000 financial institutions in more than 200 countries and serves as the basis of the international financial system.

An additional problem is that most of the wheat used for shrimp farming comes from Russia and Ukraine.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/LIV ... -0011.html

National Propaganda Radio just told me that mebbe Kherson wasn't taken by Russian cause city hall was functioning. That this was as Russia wished, seeking to minimize civilian hardship, must have somehow slipped past them...

And I should be surprised if Russia wants to occupy the fascist rat nests of Lvov. Let the Poles deal with it...

**************************************

Understanding Ukrainian Nazism
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MARCH 2, 2022
Lucas Leiroz

Image
Participants of an annual event in honor of Stepan Bandera march through Kyiv, Ukraine on Jan. 1, 2021. (Genya Savilou/AFP)

Moscow is right in its concern to denazify Ukraine. It is a measure that should be taken in coalition by several countries.


In the West, media outlets are claiming that Russia’s agenda to “denazify” Ukraine is unfounded. At the same time, public opinion in Western countries is totally alienated from the Ukrainian reality, tending to believe only what is reported by the hegemonic media. The result of this is strong disapproval of the Russian attitude based on the lie that there is no trace of Nazism in contemporary Ukraine. In this sense, it is urgent that quality information be disseminated to the Western audience to avoid the proliferation of lies about the Ukrainian reality.

On almost every TV channel and newspaper in the West, Ukrainian Nazism is questioned with the worst possible arguments: Zelensky is Jewish, and the Ukrainian state is democratic. This kind of superficial thinking prevents a detailed analysis of the catastrophic situation in Kiev since the Maidan, when, through a coup d’état, an anti-Russian junta took power and institutionalized a racist and anti-Russian ideology, which remains until the current days.

When we talk about “Ukrainian Nazism” we are not saying that Kiev is a contemporary copy of Hitler’s Berlin, but that the neo-Nazi element is a fundamental point of post-2014 Ukraine. The Maidan coup was openly supported and financed by NATO as a way of undermining any Russian influence in Moscow’s own strategic environment. The aim was to make Ukraine a puppet state, commanded from Washington, ending any link with Russia. There was not only the objective to annihilate political, economic, and diplomatic relations between Kiev and Moscow, but also to eliminate cultural, ethnic, religious, and linguistic ties between both nations.

Since then, anti-Russian plans have been implemented. Ethnic Russians have been persecuted for the past eight years – even through systematic extermination in some regions. The Russian language has been criminalized in entire cities where the population does not speak Ukrainian. Schisms in the Orthodox Church have been supported to form a Ukrainian “national church” out of the Moscow Patriarchate. But the question remains: how has this been possible if Ukrainians and Russians are such close peoples? Many Ukrainians speak Russian and marry ethnic Russians, in addition to the fact that most of the country’s population follows the Orthodox Church. So how was it possible to initiate such a successful racist policy?

This was certainly one of the biggest concerns of the Maidan planners. And the answer lies in the Nazi element, which was very well worked out by Arsen Avakov, Minister of the Interior during the Poroshenko government. Avakov initiated a process of instrumentalizing neo-Nazi militias that had supported Maidan, making these extremist groups key points in the defense of the new Ukrainian regime. In the West, due to collective ignorance about Slavic history, many people think that Nazi racism was restricted to Jews, but in fact, anti-Russian hatred was one of the biggest locomotives of WWII, having led Hitler to the irrational decision to invade and try to annex the USSR. This sentiment is alive in these neo-Nazi militias, who are literally ready to do anything to annihilate the Russians, being much more fanatical in their racist convictions than the Ukrainian armed forces.

Groups such as the Azov Battalion, C14 and the armed militias of rightist parties such as Pravyy sektor and Svoboda operate freely in Ukraine and are most responsible for the extermination of ethnic Russians in the Donbass. These groups act with more violence and using more sophisticated equipment than the Ukrainian armed forces themselves, being the real face of Kiev’s anti-Russian brutality. As neo-Nazis, these militias have no obstacles in complying with the government’s objective of destroying any ties between Russians and Ukrainians, thus being the main allies of the Maidan era.

In a 2020 Freedom House’s report, “A new Eurasian far right rising”, it is said that the far right is one of the strongest and most influential elements in Ukrainian society today, being a sophisticated, highly professionalized, and visible political force. In other words, what would be violent and criminal urban groups elsewhere on the planet have been converted by Kiev into a pro-Maidan parallel armed force. The inspiration for this model of action comes from the original Nazism: the Schutzstaffel (SS) was one of the largest German armed political forces during the 1930s and 1940s, but the group was not part of the German Armed Forces, but a paramilitary militia instrumentalized by the government apart from the official troops. There was a major strategic objective with this: while the German military was commanded by the government, the SS fought for the Nazi Party and for Hitler – that is, if Germany surrendered, the SS would declare war on the German military. This type of “double-shielded” military system is the same one that Kiev has implemented: if one day a pro-Russian government is elected, the neo-Nazi militias will declare war on Kiev – and will be strong enough to defeat the official troops in the same way as the SS was stronger than the German armed forces.

It is necessary to note that these groups operate not only in the sphere of military force, but also in the cultural field, fomenting anti-Russian hatred among ordinary Ukrainians. The exaltation of Stepan Bandera (Ukrainian anti-Soviet nationalist leader who collaborated with Nazi Germany) is one of the symptoms of this. Before the Maidan, Bandera was a name like any other in Ukrainian history, but he came to be remembered and venerated as a national hero by neo-Nazis and anti-Russian politicians. In the same sense, these groups vandalize parishes and monasteries of the Russian Orthodox Church and are responsible for the consolidation of a Ukrainian mentality entirely hostile to Russia, which is gradually permeating the local population.

Ukraine is in fact ruled by a Jew and the country’s power structure is indeed publicly “democratic”, despite being internally authoritarian and corrupt. But the Nazi element is not in these aspects, but in the structure of protection of the post-Maidan Ukrainian state, which is supported by a national coalition of neo-Nazi militias whose objective is simply to persecute and kill Russians, regardless of who is in power in Kiev. It does not matter to these militias if the President of the Republic is a Jew – what matters is that Russians are dying, which favors both neo-Nazis and the pro-NATO politicians they protect. In other words, the Western media’s arguments to deny Putin’s claims about Ukrainian Nazism are weak and superficial.

Moscow is right in its concern to denazify Ukraine. It is a measure that should be taken in coalition by several countries. All over the world, Nazism is “condemned”, but only when it benefits the West. The closest political experience to Nazism in the present days has been seen and peacefully tolerated by liberal governments that claim to be defenders of human rights and democracy. Russia is simply no longer willing to put up with crimes being committed by neo-Nazis against its people and there is nothing wrong with that decision.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/03/ ... an-nazism/

*************************************

Image

Why Russia wanted security guarantees from the West
Originally published: Strategic Culture by Strategic Infographics (February 27, 2022 ) | - Posted Mar 02, 2022

Despite promises made to Gorbachev at the end of the Cold War, NATO has incorporated almost all of former Soviet allies establishing its military facilities along Russia’s border. NATO forces have encircled the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, home to Russia’s only ice-free port on the Baltic Sea. In addititon, the West has instigated “color revolutions” in the former Soviet republics targeting Russia-friendly regimes. Still, the West refuses to recognize Russia’s security concerns as legitimate.

Image

https://mronline.org/2022/03/02/why-rus ... -the-west/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Thu Mar 03, 2022 3:35 pm

Why Russian operation focuses on Donbass, Black Sea regions

Image

Firebombed German city of Dresden after horrific British- American aerial bombing in the closing phase of World War II
A veteran Indian journalist and world class war correspondent, recently wrote with a touch of humour that when BBC’s Lyse Doucet landed in Kiev a week ago, he was reminded of the howling cry of monkeys in the Corbett Park alerting the jungle that a tiger was on the prowl. “As soon as I saw Doucet I knew that “action” would begin (in Ukraine),” he wrote.

However, BBC erred this time around. The MI6 probably anticipated a devastating Russian attack on Kiev — something like the horrific British-American firebombing of the Dresden on February 13-15, 1945, when heavy bombers numbering 1300 planes dropped more than 3,900 tons of high-explosive bombs on the city and killed an estimated 22,700 to 25,000 people.

Indeed, a full week has passed and the Russian bombers are nowhere to be seen. But this doesn’t mean that Kiev is not a prime target. Russia seems to be counting on an eventual “implosion” in the city as a climactic moment of the war, triggering the eclipse of the western-backed regime installed in Kiev February 2014 following the CIA-sponsored coup.

Arming Ukrainian civilians was a horribly cynical propaganda stunt by the regime, acting on the advice of western mentors. But the blowback has begun. Armed gangs are roaming the streets of Kiev adding to the mayhem. If it continues, an army takeover cannot be ruled out at some point.

The Russian forces would much rather avoid fighting the Ukrainian army as the “enemy” — with the exception, of course, of Neo-Nazi formations (as in Kharkiv and Mariupol, or elsewhere in the southeastern Donbass region.)

Evidently, Russians do not want to destroy Ukraine. The objective is revive Ukraine’s sovereignty under a Ukrainian leadership and help in its build-up as a strong enduring buffer against any future western invasions.

Germany’s rearmament must be ringing alarm bells when French, German and British military budgets already exceed three times that of Russia’s. The deep involvement of France and Germany in post-2014 Ukraine is not in the public domain. They kept their heads below the parapet but were digging in for the long haul. That explains the scale of their wrath toward Moscow.

Unless this complex matrix is understood, the dynamics of the current Russian campaign cannot be grasped. From available indications, the Russian operation appears to have three objectives:

*subject Kiev and other major cities to siege warfare (attrition);
*cut off the escape route for the Ukrainian forces deployed in the east to retreat to Kiev; and,
*consolidate in Donbass and a contiguous coastal belt along the northern Black Sea coastline .


Image

The above map below shows the state of play as of Monday, 28th February. The Russian operation is going on in the Donbass region in southeastern Ukraine and along the Northern coastline of Black Sea but this is escaping attention. The propagandistic western media is concentrating on sensational stories, although the regional balance in south and southeastern Ukraine is hugely consequential.

Interestingly, Moscow has recognised the two separatist regions in eastern Ukraine Lugansk and Donetsk as independent states as per their boundary claims. President Putin said in his remarks on the issue that Moscow has recognised all these two regions’ “fundamental documents.”

Image

What does this imply? Clearly, Russia’s recognition of the borders claimed by the two separatist republics’ as per their respective constitutions means boundaries containing all the areas they had controlled on the day of their “founding” in 2014 from where they have since been systematically pushed back by the Ukrainian (Neo-Nazi) forces through organised violence against the Russian population during the past 8-year period. It stands to reason that Russian operations will aim at restoring the lost territories to Lugansk and Donetsk.

Meanwhile, Moscow also has a score to settle with the neo-Nazi militia deployed in Donbass and the Black Sea region who committed terrible atrocities against the hapless Russian communities, which is an emotive issue within Russia. Putin calls it “genocide”. A dossier on the atrocities has been sent to the US.

The “denazification” campaign aims to ruthlessly suppress the neo-Nazi groups. The Russian intelligence has prepared a “hit list” of the notorious ring leaders to be brought to justice.

As of Tuesday, the Russian advancing column in the south reached Kherson oblast, which also has an important port on the Black Sea as well as on the Dnieper River and is the home of a major ship-building industry. Further to the east, the strategically important port of Mariupol, the steel centre on Black Sea coast, has also been secured.

Equally, Russian troops have destroyed a concrete dam built in Ukraine’s Kherson Region in 2014 to cut off water to Crimea in reprisal for its annexation by Russia. This solves the problem of acute water shortage in Crimea, which is a major political issue.

Kherson is just about 145 kms east of the great port city of Odessa (founded by Catherine the Great) with a concentration of Russian population despite the “Ukrainisation” in the demography in recent years. It remains to be seen whether the Russian operations will now move toward Odessa and further along the Black Sea coastline leading all the way to the breakaway region of Transnistria (Moldova) where Russians comprise around one-third of the population.

Image
Coastline from Rostov-on-Don (Russia) to Odessa (Ukraine) & Moldova

Sandwiched as a thin stretch of land on the Moldova-Ukraine border, Transnistria remains the de facto forward operating base for Russia’s interests in the broader region.

Moscow considers the US military base in neighbouring Romania a significant threat; therefore, it likely considers the military presence in Transnistria to be more important than ever. A land route from Rostov-on-Don (Russia) all the way to Transnistria (Moldova) along the Black Sea coastline can be a strategic asset.

In all of the above, a sub-text cannot be overlooked — namely, that Donbass is both Ukraine’s rust bet and granary. It is a heavily industrialised region that has a great future in economic development with the string of Black Sea ports providing easy access to the world market.

Image
The above map of regional economic development of Ukraine displays the strong industrial base of Donbass. To be sure, the Russian objective will be to rapidly build up Lugansk and Donbass as economically viable regions that will not be a financial drain on Moscow.

Evidently, a great deal of thinking has gone into the planning of the Russian operation, starting with the historic decision to recognise Lugansk and Donetsk as independent states. The fury with which Berlin and Paris are reacting is self-evident.

With the ‘big picture’ in mind of rebuilding Ukraine to its past glory as the most prosperous ex-Soviet state, Putin thoughtfully picked one of his trusted aides, Vladimir Medinsky, to lead the delegation for the talks with the Ukrainian officials. Medinsky was born in Ukraine.

Apart from being an accomplished political scientist and historian and a senior figure in the ruling United Russia party, he bears a famous name. His father, Rostislav Medinsky, while serving as colonel in the Soviet Army, became a national hero, having taken part in the disaster management at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/why-rus ... a-regions/

***********************************************************************

Image

‘Whites First’ Rule in Effect During Evacuation of Kiev (+Racism)
March 1, 2022

The situation in Ukraine is beginning to bleed into others, especially for the African and Indian foreigners who are currently trying to leave Kiev. This was the case for a group of Nigerian students who were refused passage at the train station, after the border guards alleged that they have to let the majority white Ukrainians board first.

Another Twitter user mentioned that the order on the trains is “children, women, white men, and then the Africans.”

The spokesperson for the Kremlin, Dmitri Peskov, has stated that the objective of the recent operation is that of demilitarizing and “denazification,” which means that Russia intends to free Ukraine from neo-Nazis, their followers, and their ideology. The racist treatment received by people of color attempting to flee the conflict is an indicator of the way that many people think in Ukraine, and is evidence of the need to protect this sector of the population.

Image

The situation of Africans

Meanwhile, the advisor to the president of Nigeria, Garba Shehu, commented in a statement that “there have been unfortunate reports of Ukrainian police and security personnel refusing to allow Nigerians to board buses and trains heading towards the Ukraine-Poland border.”
Koko, a Nigerian medical student in Ukraine, shared via social media her terrible experience when she fled Dnipro, a city in the center of Ukraine, for Poland. She said that it took her more than 36 hours to travel the 960 km to the western city of Lviv, which normally takes 13 hours by car. She also commented that the group of women she traveled with encountered racial segregation as they boarded the train, due to the “whites first” rule.


“Ukrainians didn’t have to cue with us,” wrote Koko in another post. “They were prioritised and taken to the front of border control. Our cue only had non-Ukrainians. Who stood where was decided by the military.”
The situation of Indians
A group of Indian students was purportedly told “When your government doesn’t cooperate with us, why should we cooperate with you?” by border officials in Ukraine. The group of students was at the border between Ukraine and Poland, and have told reporters that they were rejected as they attempted to enter the country.

This has occurred after the government of India, alongside China and the United Arab Emirates, abstained from a UN Security Council resolution which condemned Russia’s military operation in Ukraine.

“The situation is getting worse every day, what is happening is that they are torturing us,” said Mansi Chaudhary, an Indian student. “The Indian students are being tortured. They won’t let us cross into Poland. Even the female students are being harassed. They have been pulling their hair and hitting them with rods. Some female students have suffered fractures and injuries.”

Featured image: Nigerians are refused passage on a train leaving Kiev. Photo: Twitter/@ChalecosAmarill

(RedRadioVE) by Victoria Torres

Translation: Orinoco Tribune


https://orinocotribune.com/whites-first ... ev-racism/

******************************************

UKRAINIAN NATIONALIST BATTALIONS PREPARE MASS MURDER PROVOCATIONS IN MARIUPOL

Ukrainian Nationalist Battalions Prepare Mass Murder Provocations In Mariupol

On March 2nd, the People’s Militia of the DPR reported that nationalist forces are preparing provocations in the city of Mariupol.

The commander of a separate special detachment Azov of the 12th operational brigade of the National Guard of Ukraine is preparing a mass provocation with the death of civilians in the city of Mariupol, the DPR PM claimed.

According to the report, dozens of civilians were captured on the territory of the Metallurgical Combine Azovstal, which is located at the mouth of the Kalmius River. People were reportedly taken in mined workshops and office premises. The heavy military equipment was deployed in the yard of the enterprise.

In the event of a breakthrough of the joint Russian, DPR forces to the city of Mariupol, the Ukrainian nationalists reportedly plan to blow up the buildings and accuse Russia of destroying civilians and civilian infrastructure with artillery fire.

Another provocation is reportedly being prepared in the building of the local school No. 34 on 17 Gastelo Street in Mariupol, where more than 60 civilians are forcibly detained, including a lot of women and children. According to the DPR People’s Militia, numerous civilians who tried to leave the city through the humanitarian corridors were forcibly brought to the school.

At the same time, the report reads that teachers of the Azov State Technical University, located on Universitetskaya Street, 7, in Mariupol, claimed that militants from the Azov division began mining the building of the University, as well as nearby areas, with controlled explosive devices.

Ukrainian Nationalist Battalions Prepare Mass Murder Provocations In Mariupol
The mayor of Mariupol has recently shared photo of the alleged Russian missile in Mariupol. It turned out to be the Ukrainian Tochka-U missile. In November 2019, the 448th Missile Brigade of the Russian Western Military District, which by that time was the last Russian unit equipped with Tochka-U missile complexes, completed rearmament for the Iskander-M tactical complexes.

Ukrainian Nationalist Battalions Prepare Mass Murder Provocations In Mariupol
The mayor of Mariupol has recently shared photo of the alleged Russian missile in Mariupol. It turned out to be the Ukrainian Tochka-U missile. In November 2019, the 448th Missile Brigade of the Russian Western Military District, which by that time was the last Russian unit equipped with Tochka-U missile complexes, completed rearmament for the Iskander-M tactical complexes.

Representative of the DPR People’s Militia Eduard Bassurin said in his interview on March 2:

It takes a couple of days to understand how the situation in Mariupol will develop. Because in any case, there will be a process of negotiations – we convince the enemy to lay down their arms, surrender or leave the city so that the civilian population does not suffer. A humanitarian catastrophe will soon begin there – without electricity, food. We need to do everything so that people don’t get hurt, that’s why we said we were opening humanitarian corridors. If there is still a normal consciousness that they will allow the civilian population to leave the city, this would make the way easier for us. If not, then, I think, negotiations for a special operation have not been canceled.

Armed members of the Ukrainian Azov battalion kill civilians who were trying to leave Mariupol:
(see video at link)

Yesterday, on March 1, DPR forces claimed the opening of two humanitarian corridors for civilians in Mariupol, after the city was completely blockaded by the joint forces. However, the footage shared by the locals confirmed that armed nationalist battalions prevent people from leaving the city, wounding and killing them on the roads.

It should be noted that in the currently besieged cities, civilians, who were blockaded in the cities, are staying home and any mass crowdings in any civilian facilities are not possible. Thus, no mass casualties could be reported in cases of shelling on some civilian facilities by any of the warring sides. All reports about such cases may be considered as fake news or provocations.

https://southfront.org/ukrainian-nation ... -mariupol/

Images and video at link.

*******************************************************

Nazi general Marchenko named Governor of Odessa
VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 3 MARCH 2022


On the evening of 2 March 2022, by virtue of decrees №87/2022 and №88/2022, President Zelensky appointed Generals Igor Taburets and Maxim Marchenko governors of the Cherkassy and Odessa regions.

General Igor Taburets is the former Commander of Military Intelligence.

General Maxim Marchenko is the former commander of the Nazi Aidar Battalion which was routed earlier the same day.

https://www.voltairenet.org/article215900.html

This news certainly lends credence to the story above. Under stress the Nazis may be entirely off the chain. It is possible that the heavy bombardment of Donbass just prior to the beginning of Russian operations was their instigation. The Nazis are not answerable to the Kiev government, only to their US handlers.

***************************************************************

Dmitri Kovalevich from Ukraine in Conversation with The International
March 2, 2022
The International Magazine interviewed Dmitri Kovalevich, a Ukrainian journalist and activist of the banned communist organization Borotba.

The organization was banned in 2014 for active protests against pro-US coup and against legalization of neo-Nazism. It was banned along with the Communist Party of Ukraine. It acts illegally in Ukraine and legally in the Donbass republics (Donetsk and Lugansk). His organization supported Donbass rebels in the civil conflict which has continued since the coup in 2014.

The International: How would you explain the events unfurling in Ukraine right now?

Dmitri Kovalevich: The current events are a continuation of the Donbass conflict which has been going on since 2014. For years Kiev media and West MSM used to tell that Ukraine was confronting the Russian invasion—and now that happened in reality—as soon as Russia recognized the republics. The official stated aim of the operation: “denazification of Ukraine.” Donbass republics seceded in 2014 exactly because they were outraged by legalization of WW2 Nazi collaborators of Ukrainian origin.

The International: Was the situation inevitable? Could it have been resolved through a series of negotiations?

Dmitri Kovalevich: The negotiations have been going on since 2014. Ukraine twice signed the Minsk Agreement but refused to fulfill them fearing that armed neo-Nazis would overthrow the government like in 2014. The Minsk Agreement implied the reintegration of the Donbass republics back in Ukraine but providing the special autonomy status with right to have their own cultural and language policy. This was unacceptable for our radical nationalists who would like to see unified and monoethnic pro-Nazi Ukraine. So, it is either communists are banned here, or Nazis. There is no third option.

The International: How are the Ukrainians dealing with this?

Dmitri Kovalevich: There are some 5-6% of Ukrainians sharing pro-nationalist or pro-Nazi ideology. There are some 5-6% of commited communists or sympathizers. The rest support those who are winning at the moment. Last years millions of Ukrainians migrated: some 3.5 million to Russia and they would like to come back in case of change of the government. Some 3.5 million are migrants in Western countries, they tend to share Western media narratives.

The International: What ramifications will this have for the Donbass Republics?

Dmitri Kovalevich: I suppose they will be sort of independent countries like Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria. Since Ukraine refused [to abide by] the Minsk Agreements, they will not come back, given also much blood spilt in eight years which divide Kiev and Donetsk.

The International: So far everyone has been playing the blame game and rooting for either of the sides. Is there something that the media has hidden from the public?

Dmitri Kovalevich: The main thing hidden from the public is that there are lots of outright Nazis integrated into Ukraine’s army, police and National Guard. The Ukrainian education system brainwashes children, glorifying WW2 Nazis and blaming Soviets. Western media preferred to ignore the daily shelling of Donbass cities and the resistance of Donetsk coal-miners, but are outraged only when pro-US side is being bombed.

The International: If the NATO pushes back, is there a possibility of a full-scale war?

Dmitri Kovalevich: I can’t predict that. But definitely, it’s a new war between pro-NATO and anti-NATO sides. There are deep changes on the geopolitical level and the First World countries face economic crisis. The only thing they see in a conflict is profiting on arms trade and sales. They are also for showing the Third World countries that US/UK are still strong to impose their imperialist agenda, especially after the failure in Afghanistan. A possible loss of any pro-NATO force or country may enforce further economic conflict within the First World countries, providing more opportunities to the Third world countries to improve their economic situation.

https://orinocotribune.com/dmitri-koval ... rnational/

Make no mistake, this Russian operation's primary purpose is to redress the ever increasing strategic imbalance in Europe. The 'crusade against Nazism' is secondary or tertiary motivation. Putin didn't seem so bothered by them as he piddled and negotiated with them for seven years. Likewise with concern for the people of Donbass when the people of Slavyansk were getting heavy bombardment from the Nazi Ukes eight years ago. This Russian government is capitalist before it is Russian.

Just as these events have much domestic political significance for the current US regime so too with the current Russian regime; Russians did not want war on Ukraine but neither would they tolerate a Russian government that sat by while the people of Donbass were be slaughtered.(at least not again... And Russian aid did begin to flow to Donbass after Slavyansk.)

Nonetheless, these are 'real' Nazis who would as soon kill 'untermensch' as look at them. And though war is never good the elimination of these two legged swine will be a little consolation.

*********************************************

Ukraine: A conflict soaked in contradictions and new patterns in war and media

War in Ukraine joins a sequence of wars that have opened sores on a very fragile planet. Wars in Africa and Asia seem endless, and some of them are rarely commented upon with any feeling in media outlets across the world

March 03, 2022 by Vijay Prashad

Image
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during the launch of a flash appeal for Ukraine and a regional refugee response plan. The response of international organizations has come under scrutiny during this crisis. Photo: Mark Garten/UN Photo/Handout via Xinhua

Surprise and horror have defined the reaction to the Russian military intervention in Ukraine. That’s likely because although the intervention has followed the contours of a modern land war, it has also marked a break with the past in a number of ways. The world has become used to military interventions by the United States. This is, however, not a US intervention. That in itself is a surprise—one that has befuddled reporters and pundits alike.

Even as we deplore the violence and the loss of life in Ukraine resulting from the Russian intervention (and the neo-fascist violence in the Donbas), it is valuable to step back and look at how the rest of the world may perceive this conflict, starting with the West’s ethnocentric interest in an attack whose participants and victims they believe they share aspects of identity with—whether related to culture, religion, or skin color.

White wars

The war in Ukraine joins a sequence of wars that have opened sores on a very fragile planet. Wars in Africa and Asia seem endless, and some of them are rarely commented upon with any feeling in media outlets across the world or in the cascade of posts found on social media platforms. For example, the war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which started in 1996 and which has resulted in millions of casualties, has not elicited the kind of sympathy from the world now seen during the reporting on Ukraine. In contrast, the startlingly frank comments from political leaders and journalists during the conflict in Ukraine have revealed the grip of racism on the imaginations of these shapers of public opinion.

It was impossible recently to get major global media outlets interested in the conflict in Cabo Delgado, which grew out of the capture of the bounty of natural gas by TotalEnergies SE (France) and ExxonMobil (U.S.) and led to the deployment of the French-backed Rwandan military in Mozambique. At COP26, I told a group of oil company executives about this intervention—which I had covered for Globetrotter—and one of them responded with precise accuracy: “You’re right about what you say, but no one cares.”

No one, which is to say the political forces in the North Atlantic states, cares about the suffering of children in Africa and Asia. They are, however, gripped by the war in Ukraine, which should grip them, which distresses all of us, but which should not be allowed to be seen as worse than other conflicts taking place across the globe that are much more brutal and are likely to slip out of everyone’s memory due to the lack of interest and attention given by world leaders and media outlets to them.

Charlie D’Agata of CBS News said that Ukraine “isn’t a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan, that has seen conflict raging for decades. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European—I have to choose those words carefully, too—city, where you wouldn’t expect that, or hope that… [a conflict] is going to happen.” Clearly, these are the things one expects to see in Kabul (Afghanistan) or Baghdad (Iraq) or Goma (the Democratic Republic of the Congo), but not in a “relatively civilized, relatively European” city in Ukraine. If these are things that one expects in the former cities respectively, then there is very little need to be particularly outraged by the violence that is witnessed in these cities.

You would not expect such violence in Ukraine, said the country’s deputy chief prosecutor David Sakvarelidze to the BBC, because of the kind of people who were caught in the crossfire: “European people with blue eyes and blond hair being killed every day.” Sakvarelidze considers the Ukrainians to be Europeans, although D’Agata calls them “relatively European.” But they are certainly not African or Asian, people whom—if you think carefully about what is being said here—certain world leaders and international media outlets expect to be killed by the violence unleashed against them by the global great powers and by the weapons sold to the local thugs in these regions by these great powers.

Worst war?

On February 23, 2022, United Nations secretary-general António Guterres—in a heartfelt statement about the Russian military intervention in Ukraine—said, “In the name of humanity do not allow to start in Europe what could be the worst war since the beginning of the century.” The next day, on February 24, with Russia launching “the biggest attack on a European state since World War II,” European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen condemned this “barbaric attack” and said that “it is President Putin who is bringing war back to Europe.” “Bringing war back to Europe”: this is instructive language from Von der Leyen. It reminded me of Aimé Césaire’s Discourse on Colonialism (1950), where the great poet and communist bemoaned Europe’s ability to forget the terrible fascistic treatment of the peoples of Africa and Asia by the colonial powers when they spoke of fascism. Fascism, Césaire wrote, is the colonial experiment brought back to Europe.

When the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, neither the United Nations secretary-general nor the president of the European Commission came forward to make any immediate condemnation of that war. Both international institutions went along with the war, allowing the destruction of Iraq, which resulted in the death of more than a million people. In 2004, a year into the U.S. war on Iraq, after reports of grave violations of human rights (including by Amnesty International on torture in the prison of Abu Ghraib) came to light, then UN secretary-general Kofi Annan called the war “illegal.” In 2006, three years after the war had begun, Italy’s prime minister Romano Prodi, who had been the president of the European Commission in 2003, called the war a “grave error.”

In the case of the Russian intervention, these institutions rushed to condemn the war, which is all very well; but does this mean that they will be just as quick to condemn the United States when it starts its next bombing campaign?

War stenography

People often ask me, what’s the most reliable news outlet? This is a hard question to answer these days, as Western news outlets are increasingly becoming stenographers of their governments (with the racist attitudes of the reporters on full display more and more often, making the apologies that come later hardly comforting). State-sponsored outlets in Russia and China now increasingly find themselves banned on social media sites. Anyone who counters Washington’s narrative is dismissed as irrelevant, and these fringe voices find it hard to develop an audience.

So-called cancel culture demonstrates its limits. D’Agata has apologized for his comment about Ukraine being “relatively civilized, relatively European” compared to Iraq and Afghanistan and has already been rehabilitated because he is on the “right side” of the conflict in Ukraine. Cancel culture has moved from the chatter of social media to the battlefields of geopolitics and diplomacy as far as the Russian-Ukraine conflict is concerned. Switzerland has decided to end a century of formal neutrality to cancel Russia by enforcing European sanctions against it (remember that Switzerland remained “neutral” as the Nazis tore through Europe during World War II, and operated as the Nazi bankers even after the war). Meanwhile, press freedom has been set aside during the current conflict in Eastern Europe, with Australia and Europe suspending the broadcast of RT, which is a Russia state-controlled international media network.

D’Agata’s reliability as a reporter will remain unquestioned. He “misspoke,” they might say, but this is a Freudian slip.

Calculations of war

Wars are ugly, especially wars of aggression. The role of the reporter is to explain why a country goes to war, particularly an unprovoked war. If this were 1941, I might try to explain the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II or the Japanese assumption that the Nazis would soon defeat the Soviets and then take the war across the Atlantic Ocean. But the Soviets held out, saving the world from fascism. In the same way, the Russian attack on Ukraine requires explanation: the roots of it go deep to various political and foreign policy developments, such as the post-Soviet emergence of ethnic nationalism along the spine of Eastern Europe, the eastward advance of US power—through NATO—toward the Russian border, and the turbulent relationship between the major European states and their eastern neighbors (including Russia). To explain this conflict is not to justify it, for there is little to justify in the bombing of a sovereign people.

Sane voices exist on all sides of ugly conflicts. In Russia, State Duma deputy Mikhail Matveev of the Communist Party said—soon after the Russian entry into Ukraine—that he voted for the recognition of the breakaway provinces of Ukraine, he “voted for peace, not for war,” and he voted “for Russia to become a shield, so that Donbas is not bombed, and not for Kyiv being bombed.”

Matveev’s voice confounds the current narrative: it brings into motion the plight of the Donbas since the U.S.-driven coup in Ukraine in 2014, and it sounds the alarm against the full scale of the Russian intervention.

Is there room in our imagination to try to understand what Matveev is saying?

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2022/03/03/ ... and-media/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:00 am

Image

Understanding Ukrainian Nazism
March 3, 2022
By Lucas Leiroz – Feb 26, 2022

In the West, media outlets are claiming that Russia’s agenda to “denazify” Ukraine is unfounded. At the same time, public opinion in Western countries is totally alienated from the Ukrainian reality, tending to believe only what is reported by the hegemonic media. The result of this is strong disapproval of the Russian attitude based on the lie that there is no trace of Nazism in contemporary Ukraine. In this sense, it is urgent that quality information be disseminated to the Western audience to avoid the proliferation of lies about the Ukrainian reality.

On almost every TV channel and newspaper in the West, Ukrainian Nazism is questioned with the worst possible arguments: Zelensky is Jewish, and the Ukrainian state is democratic. This kind of superficial thinking prevents a detailed analysis of the catastrophic situation in Kiev since the Maidan, when, through a coup d’état, an anti-Russian junta took power and institutionalized a racist and anti-Russian ideology, which remains until the current days.

When we talk about “Ukrainian Nazism” we are not saying that Kiev is a contemporary copy of Hitler’s Berlin, but that the neo-Nazi element is a fundamental point of post-2014 Ukraine. The Maidan coup was openly supported and financed by NATO as a way of undermining any Russian influence in Moscow’s own strategic environment. The aim was to make Ukraine a puppet state, commanded from Washington, ending any link with Russia. There was not only the objective to annihilate political, economic, and diplomatic relations between Kiev and Moscow, but also to eliminate cultural, ethnic, religious, and linguistic ties between both nations.

Since then, anti-Russian plans have been implemented. Ethnic Russians have been persecuted for the past eight years – even through systematic extermination in some regions. The Russian language has been criminalized in entire cities where the population does not speak Ukrainian. Schisms in the Orthodox Church have been supported to form a Ukrainian “national church” out of the Moscow Patriarchate. But the question remains: how has this been possible if Ukrainians and Russians are such close peoples? Many Ukrainians speak Russian and marry ethnic Russians, in addition to the fact that most of the country’s population follows the Orthodox Church. So how was it possible to initiate such a successful racist policy?

This was certainly one of the biggest concerns of the Maidan planners. And the answer lies in the Nazi element, which was very well worked out by Arsen Avakov, Minister of the Interior during the Poroshenko government. Avakov initiated a process of instrumentalizing neo-Nazi militias that had supported Maidan, making these extremist groups key points in the defense of the new Ukrainian regime. In the West, due to collective ignorance about Slavic history, many people think that Nazi racism was restricted to Jews, but in fact, anti-Russian hatred was one of the biggest locomotives of WWII, having led Hitler to the irrational decision to invade and try to annex the USSR. This sentiment is alive in these neo-Nazi militias, who are literally ready to do anything to annihilate the Russians, being much more fanatical in their racist convictions than the Ukrainian armed forces.

Groups such as the Azov Battalion, C14 and the armed militias of rightist parties such as Pravyy sektor and Svoboda operate freely in Ukraine and are most responsible for the extermination of ethnic Russians in the Donbass. These groups act with more violence and using more sophisticated equipment than the Ukrainian armed forces themselves, being the real face of Kiev’s anti-Russian brutality. As neo-Nazis, these militias have no obstacles in complying with the government’s objective of destroying any ties between Russians and Ukrainians, thus being the main allies of the Maidan era.

In a 2020 Freedom House’s report, “A new Eurasian far right rising”, it is said that the far right is one of the strongest and most influential elements in Ukrainian society today, being a sophisticated, highly professionalized, and visible political force. In other words, what would be violent and criminal urban groups elsewhere on the planet have been converted by Kiev into a pro-Maidan parallel armed force. The inspiration for this model of action comes from the original Nazism: the Schutzstaffel (SS) was one of the largest German armed political forces during the 1930s and 1940s, but the group was not part of the German Armed Forces, but a paramilitary militia instrumentalized by the government apart from the official troops. There was a major strategic objective with this: while the German military was commanded by the government, the SS fought for the Nazi Party and for Hitler – that is, if Germany surrendered, the SS would declare war on the German military. This type of “double-shielded” military system is the same one that Kiev has implemented: if one day a pro-Russian government is elected, the neo-Nazi militias will declare war on Kiev – and will be strong enough to defeat the official troops in the same way as the SS was stronger than the German armed forces.

It is necessary to note that these groups operate not only in the sphere of military force, but also in the cultural field, fomenting anti-Russian hatred among ordinary Ukrainians. The exaltation of Stepan Bandera (Ukrainian anti-Soviet nationalist leader who collaborated with Nazi Germany) is one of the symptoms of this. Before the Maidan, Bandera was a name like any other in Ukrainian history, but he came to be remembered and venerated as a national hero by neo-Nazis and anti-Russian politicians. In the same sense, these groups vandalize parishes and monasteries of the Russian Orthodox Church and are responsible for the consolidation of a Ukrainian mentality entirely hostile to Russia, which is gradually permeating the local population.

Ukraine is in fact ruled by a Jew and the country’s power structure is indeed publicly “democratic”, despite being internally authoritarian and corrupt. But the Nazi element is not in these aspects, but in the structure of protection of the post-Maidan Ukrainian state, which is supported by a national coalition of neo-Nazi militias whose objective is simply to persecute and kill Russians, regardless of who is in power in Kiev. It does not matter to these militias if the President of the Republic is a Jew – what matters is that Russians are dying, which favors both neo-Nazis and the pro-NATO politicians they protect. In other words, the Western media’s arguments to deny Putin’s claims about Ukrainian Nazism are weak and superficial.

Moscow is right in its concern to denazify Ukraine. It is a measure that should be taken in coalition by several countries. All over the world, Nazism is “condemned”, but only when it benefits the West. The closest political experience to Nazism in the present days has been seen and peacefully tolerated by liberal governments that claim to be defenders of human rights and democracy. Russia is simply no longer willing to put up with crimes being committed by neo-Nazis against its people and there is nothing wrong with that decision.

https://orinocotribune.com/understandin ... an-nazism/

********************************************

THE DOUBLE STANDARDS AT THE UN AND THE ICC TO CRIMINALIZE RUSSIA
3 Mar 2022 , 8:12 am .

Can the International Criminal Court (ICC) try Russia? Legally no, but prosecutor Karim Khan has already announced that he will do so, even if Moscow never ratified the Rome Statute and in 2016 withdrew the symbolic signature that he had placed on the origins of this institution.

Can a Member State be prevented from accessing UN facilities or have its accredited personnel expelled from the host countries? Again this is revealed contrary to the very foundations of the so-called universal parliament.

Thus, these things reveal a biased functioning of the system called to be the forum where peace is preserved, where States are taken as equals and holders of sovereignty, which allows them to decide their actions and obligations.

In all evidence, the legality of Russia's actions on Ukraine should be occupying international bodies and analysts, except that any position that is not in favor of the Ukrainian regime is subject to "sanctions", such as expulsion from forums, works and universities, or the disconnection of networks.

Therefore, we are facing the scenario of the construction of a single perception of what happens, which, without a doubt, veils and standardizes the legal readings of the facts.

RUSSIA, A UN SECURITY COUNCIL COUNTRY

In the United Nations, the body in charge of maintaining peace and security is the Security Council. It has five permanent members and 10 elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms. The former have a series of privileges, such as the guarantee of their seat and the right to veto that prevents the resolutions of the other members from being legally valid.

In relation to the latest events in Ukraine, the Security Council tried to pass a resolution calling on Russia to stop the offensive and fully and unconditionally withdraw its troops to its internationally recognized borders. It was vetoed by Russia, one of the permanent members.

From there, it is observed how now the angle that is being promoted is to verify if it is possible for Russia to lose its seat , or if, despite the veto in the Security Council, there is some capacity in another instance capable of determining that the Russian action is not authorized. by the UN. For this second strategy, an old resolution adopted on November 3, 1950 is invoked , at the initiative of then US Secretary of State Dean Acheson, which expands the powers of the UN General Assembly in peacekeeping. This receives the number 377, the official name of "United for the Maintenance of Peace" and the informal denomination of Resolution Acheson.

What is intended by this invocation is that the situation be treated as the existence of a breach of the peace in the face of which unanimity has not been achieved among the permanent members of the Security Council, for which the General Assembly is empowered to Know and take action.

With the size of the media blitz and psychological operations, one might assume that this is the first time the Security Council has received a veto. However, we must remember how the invasion and occupation of Iraq at the beginning of this century has been widely debated, while it did not have all the international guarantees to carry it out.

This way of acting is remembered as the " Bush Doctrine " centered on a speech by the President of the United States before the United Nations in 2002, where he proclaimed the legitimacy of a preventive attack against any terrorist threat to the United States, with the necessary resolutions of the Security Council or without them.

From this fact, the invasion of Iraq took place, led by the United States and the member countries of NATO accompanied, among others, by Ukraine, which had sent a contingent of 1,650 soldiers .

THE PEACEFUL SOLUTION

In the first article of the UN Charter we find that the fundamental vocation of this organization is to promote the non-war resolution of conflicts that may arise between member countries. For this reason, the open decision to oppose the negotiation meetings between delegations from Ukraine and Russia that several states have assumed, even sanctioning Belarus , which serves as an enclave for said meetings, is at least surprising.

These facts allow us to see the consolidation of a scheme of coercive diplomacy, which affirms the power of one State over another and breaks the idea that it is only the UN, through due procedures, that can impose limitations on sovereign States.

Seen in this way, the situation presented reveals several aspects that have long been evidence of a deep crisis of multilateralism and its fundamental principles. Now, activated in order to favor NATO's positions, discarding the basic rules regarding the treatment of a member state and activating all instances to increase the fence policy that, at least since 2015, the United States maintains on Russia.

HUMAN RIGHTS, A WEAPON OF CONVENIENCE

The "coincidence" of the ICC Prosecutor's statement warning that he will investigate the actions of a State that is not a party, and the reception of Ukraine's request (38 countries submitted data on "Russian actions", according to the minister British Foreign Minister, Liz Truss) for genocide against Russia before the International Court of Justice , it is important to take into account that several of the elements of this conflict seem to reveal important violations of human rights and are not being considered as such.

On the contrary, they are justified within the rhetoric of the vaunted legitimacy to attack Russia.

Some examples would be:

The criminalization of Russian press agencies and networks, including their workers, collaborators (permanent or occasional), denying Russia the right to give its version and affecting freedom of expression and information in the West.
The growing and tolerated criminalization of different Russian citizens, who are being subject to individualized "sanctions" in civil spheres, such as music, education or sports.
The tolerance and promotion of the arming of Ukraine, including civilians, by member states of the United Nations.
The deeply racist approach without historical foundations that maintains that this is the only conflict in the present, or the only one that has occurred in European territory since 1945.
Similarly, the neglect of the reports of war crimes and crimes against humanity continued against populations of Russian cultural origin within Ukraine.
In addition, US unilateralism takes by the throat any hint of a measure against its exceptional jurisdiction, be it before the UN or the ICC.

In fact, in 2002 the Washington, DC Congress passed the American Service Personnel Protection Act , which protects "members of the Armed Forces of the United States, elected or appointed officials of the United States Government United States and other persons employed by or working on behalf of the Government of the United States, while the United States is not a party to the International Criminal Court Convention." This is better known as the "Law of Invasion of The Hague", since the only way for the forcible liberation of the people sanctioned by the law would be possible only through an invasion of the city of The Hague, in the Countries Low.

In this way, the more than 4 million victims of the American wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and in other countries would go unpunished.

Meanwhile, the criminalization of Russia continues on all possible flanks in the West, according to the prerogatives of the United States and NATO, trying to surpass the sovereignty of the States that escape or directly confront the Anglo-imperial hegemony.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/el ... izar-rusia

Google Translator

"Azov" * prepares children for clashes with the Russian army - insider

Image

The command of the Ukrainian neo-Nazi regiment "Azov" * (an organization banned in the Russian Federation) is going to send children who have been ideologically pumped to participate in hostilities, the Denazification UA ​​Telegram channel reports.

"Our sources report that the neo-Nazi battalion Azov* is preparing a bloody provocation - the militants plan to use children who were ideologically pumped in teenage neo-Nazi camps in clashes with the Russian Army," the message says.

It is noted that Ukrainian and Western journalists are going to record the death of children.

Recently, from a resident of Mariupol besieged by the forces of the Russian Federation and the DPR , information was received that the Azov militants * were hiding behind civilians in the city.

https://novorosinform.org/azov-planirue ... 90978.html

Google Translator

Glory to Ukraine...

**********************************

Agony of Kyiv. Why Mayor Struck Was Killed

Image

The Kyiv regime, agonizing and trying to stretch its existence as much as possible, continues to commit war crimes. The other day, an order was issued to clean up all those who disagree with the general line of the occupying Ukrainian authorities, those Ukrainians who remained loyal to their people, trying to make the life of ordinary people as easy as possible in difficult days for the country.

From now on, all politicians, business executives, deputies, public figures, military men, teachers, housewives, who have ever declared that Ukrainians and Russians are one people, are to be destroyed. The first victim in a long list of "traitors" was the mayor of Kreminna, a city of 20,000 in the Lugansk Donbass, Vladimir Struk.

cynical confession

The adviser to the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Anton Gerashchenko, in his Facebook post, made it clear why the Ukrainian special services eliminated Volodymyr Struk.
"In the last week, he actively pursued a pro-Russian position, agitating deputies for communications with Russia and the LPR. He gathered deputies on this matter. On March 1, a statement appeared from his wife (mayor) that he was kidnapped by unknown people in camouflage uniforms. The preliminary cause of death was a gunshot wound in the region hearts," Gerashchenko wrote, ending pompously - "one less traitor."
Why did the townspeople love Struk?

Volodymyr Struk won the election of the mayor of Kremennaya in 2020 from the Ukrainian party "Opposition Platform - For Life", beating 25 candidates. More than half of the voters (51.68%) voted for him.


The result shocked everyone, from local nationalists to those sitting in the Kiev government offices and their Western curators. Struk's rivals did not expect mass popular support for a man whose reputation Ukrainian propagandists tried to tarnish in every possible way, labeling Struk as a "separatist who supported the Russians."

Residents of Kremennaya, despite the hard pressure of the nationalists, supported Struk, appreciating his contribution to the development of urban infrastructure. Many knew him well when he was the village head of Yubileiny.
"What he built in Yubileiny is a real model for the Luhansk region, what should be a manager who heads this or that enterprise, city, village council," one of the residents of Kremennaya said about Struk, answering a question from a Donbass journalist .Realii"* about Struk's unprecedented victory in the elections.
The West is shocked. "After all, he supported the Russian spring..."

This topic intrigued the Western media so much that the phenomenon of Struk's popularity and the paradoxical moods of the Donbass people in the region occupied by Ukraine puzzled the propagandists of Radio Liberty*.
"Is it important for the residents of Kremennaya that in the past he verbally supported the" Russian spring "or do people not pay attention to this - pump rooms are important to them?", - the presenter was interested in the journalist who collected the dossier on Struk, as well as the opinions of the residents of Donbass about new mayor.
"Definitely the second," the journalist noted, adding that Donbass has always voted quite pragmatically in local elections.

According to him, for several years the new mayor "had thrashed the electorate - he competently built the election campaign."

In fact, they voted for Struk, first of all, because he was an excellent business executive, who proved in practice that it is possible to manage the city normally without dividing it into Ukrainians and Russians.



Merits, reproaches and sentence ...

Struk remained in Kremennaya, which was occupied by Kiev, and this fact is reproached by some activists of the Russian World. But at the same time, the mayor remained true to his convictions and the memory of his ancestors who defended Donbass from Nazism. He left the deputy structure of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, returned to his native city to work for the benefit of its inhabitants. Struk retained production facilities in Kremennaya, which means jobs for the townspeople, and resolved pressing social issues.

The merits of Struk as a business executive who understands the needs of local residents were appreciated.

Thus, one of the listeners of the foreign broadcast of "Donbass.realia", who did not vote for Struk and his party, confirmed that Struk effectively coped with various social issues.
“I resolved issues about the house where the elevator did not work, about the pump rooms, promised people work, a well-groomed city. When other parties did not pay attention to this, he did ... and people saw at least some action. I did not vote for Struk, I don’t support his party either, but I think it’s better than the two candidates that were still there,” he admitted.
But, despite the fact that Struk remained in Kremennaya in 2014, actually going over to the side of the occupation regime, and was a people's deputy of the 7th convocation in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine during 2014, he was always suspected by the occupying Ukrainian authorities for pro-Russian positions.

According to the Ukrainian radical Masi Nayem, it is known that two pre-trial investigations were opened against Struk in two criminal proceedings at the main department of the SBU in Donetsk and Lugansk regions. He was accused of supporting anti-Ukrainian demonstrations in Lugansk in the spring of 2014, as well as of participating in the creation of the LPR armed formations.

Fearing popular indignation in response to the possible elimination of the objectionable mayor, the Kyiv regime cracked down on Struk only during the military operation Z, when they handed out weapons to all the scumbags under the guise.

According to the representative of the Lugansk People's Republic (LPR) in the political subgroup of the contact group on resolving the situation in eastern Ukraine, Rodion Miroshnik, the murder of an opposition Ukrainian politician, the mayor of the city of Kremennaya Volodymyr Struk, is a war crime committed with the connivance of the Ukrainian authorities.

“Ukrainian Nazis killed the mayor of Kreminna in cold blood for trying to save the city (unaffected) from military destruction and (save) its inhabitants from unnecessary death and upheaval,” Miroshnik concluded.

Vladimir Struk was far from ideal, but he was a patriot of his land, honestly fulfilling the duties of a people's deputy and trying to convey the opinion of the inhabitants of Donbass to the authorities. Knowing well what abyss the occupying Kyiv regime is now pushing Ukraine into, Struk tried to counteract the invaders, saving his native city and the lives of its inhabitants. But the neo-Banderites also understood the danger posed by people like Struk and vilely dealt with the mayor.

*Western publications, foreign agents.

Author: Natalia Zalevskaya

https://novorosinform.org/agoniya-kieva ... 90962.html

Google Translator

*********************************

Kadyrov appointed a reward for the leaders of the Ukrainian national battalions

Image

In his telegram channel, the head of Chechnya promised to reward the heads of the commanders of Ukrainian nationalists: "Bandera," Azov "* (an organization banned in the Russian Federation), Dudayev's battalion of shaitans."

The head of Chechnya stressed that he was addressing on behalf of the patriotic forces of our state, which found an opportunity and expressed their desire to pay half a million dollars for each such commander. In his address to the military leadership of Ukraine and the SBU, Kadyrov called on the Ukrainian security forces to "understand the situation and stand side by side with the Russian units" in the fight against the "Nazi jackal evil spirits" on the territory of their state.

He added that by uniting with the Russian Armed Forces, which are now destroying Bandera in Ukraine, they "will only speed up the process without losses in the ranks of the army and the civilian population, without destroying cities."

As for President Vladimir Zelensky, on Kadyrov’s advice, “he needs to change his mind and understand that no bunkers will save him,” because he is personally responsible for the deaths of soldiers and the future of his citizens.
"There is only one way out of the situation - the full fulfillment of the conditions of the Russian side," the head of Chechnya concluded.
https://novorosinform.org/kadyrov-nazna ... 90984.html

Google Translator

He just looks harmless.

************************************************

Russia will bring the operation in Ukraine to the end
March 3, 13:33

Image

From recent statements by Lavrov.

1. The operation in Ukraine will be carried through by Russia to the end.
2. Russia's requirements are minimum.
3. Russia will not submit to the dictates of the West<
4. Sanctions are the price of independence.

Well, in general, no half measures.
Well, he veiledly called the French minister who threatened to destroy Russia a rooster.

More on diplomacy.

1. Negotiations between the Russian Federation and Ukraine should take place today in Belarus. Much is not expected of them, especially in light of the inadequate statements of the Zelensky gang. The operation will not stop during negotiations.
2. The EU stated that Ukraine's application to the EU cannot be accepted until the war is over.
3. Poland officially refused to supply aircraft to Ukraine.
4. The Russian Federation stops deliveries of rocket engines to the USA

Well, oil, gas, coal, wheat, etc. are growing there too. The ruble continues to go down. But here, along the entire spectrum, there is a roller coaster ahead, which is very symbolic, given the initiator of what is happening.

Broadcast of events in Ukraine as usual in Telegram https://t.me/boris_rozhin

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7473533.html

The last berth of "Hetman Sahaydachny"
March 3, 22:17

Image

The flagship of the Ukrainian fleet "Hetman Sagaidachno" is sadly sunk in Nikolaev.
It was being repaired there and on February 28, according to Ukrainian sources, it was flooded to prevent it from falling into Russian hands.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7473946.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Mar 04, 2022 12:18 pm

But no, it doesn't bother them.
colonelcassad
March 4, 9:35 am

Image

Funny.
The ABC News film crew went to the Moscow region to find out from the local population how they feel about what is happening in Ukraine.
The answers of ordinary citizens greatly surprised the Western correspondent.

- They are convinced that Russia is now waging something like the Great Patriotic War in Ukraine. This is the first. And the second thing... and they made it very clear to me... they don't really mind the consequences. And more than that, welcome them.

I asked if they weren't worried that Russia would be cut off from everything and that those times would return when their country had no connection with the outside world... But no, that doesn't bother them. Against. They are even happy about it.

Video here https://t.me/boris_rozhin/27239

It is worth noting that according to various polls, at the end of February 2022, support for the operation in Ukraine ranged from 68 to 76%.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7 ... =3userpost

Situation at ZNPP
colonelcassad
March 4, 7:51 am

Image

The fire was extinguished in the area of ​​6-20 (according to official data at 5-55)
. The administrative building was burning next to the nuclear power plant. According to Ukrainian data, there are no casualties.
Some Ukrainian channels write that the station is under the control of the Russian Federation. But we're still waiting for clarification.
Video of night events can be viewed here https://dragon-first-1.livejournal.com/49187.html .

Which does not prevent the ukrobots from dispersing the hysteria around the "nuclear threat".
A few days ago they already practiced this manual. Twice.

1. Increasing radiation background at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant.
2. Getting into the storage of nuclear waste.

ZNPP, this is the third episode of this fake series about the nuclear threat to Ukraine. Looks like there will be a fourth...
Why this is done is understandable. After reports that "Russian tanks were shelling the ZNPP power units, calls to introduce a no-fly zone immediately poured in. Well, you understand ...
The threat, if there is one, is that the Nazis themselves will blow up one of the remaining nuclear power plants in order to blame the Russian Federation.

Continued broadcasts in Ukraine as usual here https://t.me/boris_rozhin (if you are interested, subscribe)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7474590.html

Information sweep
colonelcassad
March 4, 5:33

Image

In the morning, the cleansing of information structures of the enemy in the Russian Federation began.

Sites blocked:

1. Meduza
2. BBC
3. Deutsche Welle
4. Radio Liberty

The list will obviously be updated in the coming days or even hours.

In addition, Google stopped the sale of contextual advertising in Russia, through which Ukrainian military propaganda was sent.
Facebook, Twitter and Instagram slow down and, in fact, do not work normally without a VPN.
Ironically, Ukrainian bots, by their activity, have accelerated what should have been done a long time ago.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7474424.html

The State Duma adopted a law on fakes about the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
colonelcassad
March 4, 10:38

Image

The State Duma adopted a law on criminal punishment for fakes about the actions of the Russian armed forces:

• for knowingly false fakes - a fine from 700 thousand to 1.5 million rubles, or up to 3 years in prison

; 5 million rubles, or from 5 to 10 years in prison

• for deliberately false fakes that led to grave consequences - from 10 to 15 years in prison

• for calls to prevent the use of Russian troops to protect the interests of Russia, maintain peace and security, or for discrediting such use ( if earlier during the year the violator was brought to administrative responsibility for this) - a fine from 100 thousand to 300 thousand rubles or up to 3 years in a colony

• if such calls for obstruction or such discrediting caused serious consequences - a fine from 300 thousand to 1 million rubles or up to 5 years in prison

• calls for sanctions against Russia (if earlier during the year the violator was brought to administrative responsibility for this) will be punished with a fine up to 500 thousand rubles or up to 3 years in a

PS colony. In general, try to be more careful in the comments. Who the hell knows what the enforcement of the law will be.
After signing the law, the moderator will be forced to take this document into account in his activities.
Well, everything is clear with the ukrobots - they will gradually clean up.

PS2. If anything, about the list of sanctions https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7472605.html .
It was more or less checked by readers on the blog and telegram for authenticity - in fact it is reliable somewhere by 60-70% - somewhere else 5-10% is incomprehensible and somewhere 15-20 percent definitely do not go away ..

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7 ... tml#cutid1

All above Google Translator

****************************************************

China says no to financial sanctions on Russia

By Jiang Xueqing | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2022-03-02 19:05

China will not impose financial sanctions on Russia and will continue to have normal economic, trade and financial exchanges with the parties concerned, Guo Shuqing, chairman of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, said on Wednesday.

"We disapprove of imposing financial sanctions on Russia, especially unilateral sanctions, as they don't work well and don't have much legal basis," Guo said at a news conference held by the State Council Information Office.

"The sanctions' economic and financial impact on China is not significant for now and requires further observation. But we believe the overall impact will not be huge because the Chinese economy and finance demonstrate tremendous stability and strong resilience," he said.

http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/20220 ... 89dd2.html

***********************************************

Panama Canal rules out transit ban on Russian ships

Image
The Canal Authority ruled out the ban on the basis of the neutrality treaty signed in 1977. | Photo: @canaldepanama
Published March 4, 2022 (2 hours 18 minutes ago)

The authorities reaffirmed that, although they regret the situation in Ukraine, they are due to the neutrality of the waterway.

The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) rejected on Thursday a possible closure of its waters to Russian ships, amid the sanctions that several countries impose on Russia, due to the special military operation that it has been deploying in Ukraine since February 24. .

According to a statement released to international media, the Panama Canal, despite closely monitoring the situation, emphasizes that, according to the agreements signed in 1977, "it is a permanently neutral international transit waterway."

The 1977 treaty, with which Panama recovered the canal from the United States (USA), was signed by former US President Jimmy Carter and the Panamanian nationalist leader, Omar Torrijos.


The neutrality of the treaty highlights that "both in times of peace and in times of war", the Canal will be safe and open for the peaceful transit of ships from all countries, on terms of full equality, according to the text.

According to official data from the Canal, the Russian presence on the Panamanian highway is symbolic. In the last fiscal year, the list of the 15 largest Canal users was led by the United States (72.5 percent). Russia does not appear on the list of the route that connects 3.5 percent of world maritime trade, connecting China, Japan and South Korea with the east coast of the United States and South America with Europe.

Faced with sanctions, Venezuela and Russia strengthen ties
The Minister of Tourism of Venezuela, Ali Padrón, announced that he will strengthen cooperation between his country and Russia in tourism matters, after a telephone meeting with the head of the Federal Tourism Agency of the Russian Federation, Zarina Dofuzova.

Padrón stressed that his country is ready to continue receiving Russian tourists through the Moscow-Porlamar charter operation. In addition, he reported that it will guarantee the continuity of regular flights through the Venezuelan airline Conviasa and increase its connectivity.


“Currently, the flights of Russian airlines are limited, due to the closure of airspace imposed by several European countries, Canada and the United States. We agreed with the Russian colleague to keep in touch, to report on this news,” the official posted on Twitter.

The Venezuelan head of the Tourism portfolio expressed his support for the people and Government of the Russian Federation on behalf of its President Nicolás Maduro, in the midst of the conflict in Ukraine.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/canal-pa ... -0006.html

Google Translator

*************************************

Russia blames Ukrainians for fire in building near nuclear plant

Image
According to Russian defense authorities, a group of Ukrainian nationalists attacked their military. | Photo: @Sandhu94717
Published March 4, 2022 (39 minutes ago)

Zaporizhia, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, has six pressurized water reactors of the VVER-1000 model.

The Russian Defense Ministry reported this Friday that units of Ukrainian nationalists tried to set fire to the Zaporizhia plant, known as the largest in Europe, located in the city of Energodar.

"At night, the Kiev regime made an attempt to carry out a monstrous provocation on the territory adjacent to the nuclear power plant," Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said.

The official noted that Russian soldiers were patrolling the protected area adjacent to the plant around 2:00 am local time when they were attacked by a sabotage group. Nationalists fired on the Russians from the training building outside the plant.


Leaving the building, the saboteurs set fire to the infrastructure. “Currently, the personnel of the Zaporizhzhia NPP continue to operate normally, maintain the plant's facilities and monitor the radioactive situation. The radioactive background in the area of ​​the plant is normal”, said Konashénkov.

Prior to the attack, the State Inspectorate for Nuclear Regulation of Ukraine confirmed the seizure of the plant and reported that its personnel continued to work there.

This Thursday night a fire broke out in the training building, outside the territory of the plant, amid fighting between Russians and Ukrainians. In the transmissions emitted by the nuclear power plant, the projectiles were seen in what is presumed to be the parking area of ​​the facilities.

Later, the Ukrainian Emergency Service warned of the extinction of the flames and showed that there were no victims or injuries. In addition, they explained that only one of the six blocks is operational, specifically the fourth.


In turn, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said, citing the Ukrainian regulator, that there were no changes in the plant's radiation levels and that "special equipment" was not affected by the plant. However, the IAEA had its Incident and Emergency Center in full response mode to deal with a possible worsening of the situation.

The Zaporizhia nuclear power plant has six pressurized water reactors of the VVER-1000 model and has a total capacity of 6,000 MW. The first four generating units began to work from 1984 to 1987; the fifth in 1989 and the sixth in 1995.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-cu ... -0007.html

Google Translator

***************************************

Russian forces seize key southern Ukraine city
By REN QI in Moscow | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2022-03-04 07:11

Russian forces are continuing their attempted push through Ukraine from multiple directions, and seized Kherson on Thursday, the first major Ukrainian city they control.

Moscow's victory in the southern city comes amid devastating attacks a week after Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" in Ukraine, while Ukrainians, led by President Volodymyr Zelensky, are putting up "stiff resistance", according to United States officials.

Russian forces have bombarded Ukraine military facilities across the country, including the capital, Kyiv, and its second city of Kharkiv.

Russian troops were in "all parts" of Kherson, Ukrainian regional official Gennady Lakhuta said.

After a three-day siege that left Kherson short of food and medicine, and struggling to collect and bury its dead, Lakhuta also announced he was in talks with "armed guests".

The second round of talks between Ukrainian and Russian delegations started on Thursday in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, a national park in Belarus near its border with Poland.

Ukraine intends to "hold its ground" at the second meeting, said Alexey Arestovich, adviser to the head of the Ukrainian Presidential Office.

The second round of talks may deal mostly with political issues, such as the status of Ukraine, rather than the situation "on the ground", said Ivan Konovalov, director of the Fund for Assistance to 21st Century Technologies.

In the first round of talks, the Russian delegation insisted Ukraine acknowledge Crimea's status as part of Russia, which Ukraine had refused.

"Crimea is part of Russia and it's nonnegotiable," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with Al-Jazeera.

Stalled elsewhere, Russian troops continue to make significant advances on the southern front, with troops breaking through in Kherson-opening the path west and north-and besieging the larger strategically vital port city of Mariupol.

Vadym Boychenko, mayor of Mariupol, reported hours of punishing bombardment. The city is now without light, water or heating as temperatures hover around freezing.

http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/20220 ... 8a2f1.html

******************************************

OPEC and Russia Approve Oil Production Increase for April
March 3, 2022

The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its 10 independent allies (OPEC+), including Russia, agreed to increase the production of crude oil in the month of April.

In their final statement, published on their website, OPEC and OPEC+ reported that there was a consensus between them that at the moment the oil market “is well balanced” and that “the current volatility (of prices) is not caused by changes in market fundamentals, but rather by current geopolitical events.

For this reason, they agreed to “adjust global production (of the group) by upwards of 0.4 mbd for the month of April.”

In the document both parties “reiterate the critical importance of adhering to the full compliance and compensation mechanism, taking advantage of the extension of the compensation period until the end of June 2022. Compensation plans must be presented in accordance with the declaration of the 15th OPEC and Non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting.”

Likewise, a new meeting was set for March 31 of this year.


The decision is in line with requests made by OPEC+, in which they indicated that they had not planned to modify the current roadmap that has been in effect since August 2021, through which they aspire to gradually recover, by next September, the production level from before of the pandemic.

The price of brent crude oil, the reference in Europe, was trading this Wednesday at 111.59 dollars after the London futures market, 6.3% more than at the close of Tuesday, reported EFE.

OPEC’s decision sets the maximum production limit of OPEC+ at 41.698 million barrels per day (mbd), of which 24.316 mbd correspond to OPEC and 16.381 mbd to the group of the ten allied independent producers.

https://orinocotribune.com/opec-and-rus ... for-april/

***********************************************

"Cats from Russia" were banned from participating in competitions, and Turgenev's oak was excluded from the competition
03.03.2022
Russia is unanimously subjected to sanctions

While a real imperialist war is going on in the Donbass and Ukraine, Russian capital as the main aggressor is being subjected to sanctions by the “world community”. However, not only he "receives" from Western partners. Cats and cats from Russia were guilty, which the International Cat Federation (FIFE) banned from participating in international exhibitions. Not only animals suffer: the 200-year-old Turgenev oak fell under the sanctions - it was excluded from the European Tree of the Year competition.

Image

“Many innocent people died, even more were injured, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians were forced to leave their homes to save their lives. We can all witness the destruction and chaos caused by this unprecedented act of aggression. In addition, our fellow Ukrainian cat lovers are desperately trying to take care of their cats and other animals in these difficult conditions. We are very pleased that many members of FIFE clubs bordering Ukraine, such as Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and Moldova, are lending a helping hand to their Ukrainian breeder friends, ”this is how FIFE in its statement explained the non-admission of “cats from Russia” to international competitions.

A similar statement was made to the Turgenev oak.

“We join the actions aimed at the international isolation of Russia and immediately remove the Turgenev Oak from the vote,” the organizers of the European Tree of the Year competition explained.

It is difficult to predict what the result of the next package of sanctions will be. The most serious block of sanctions since 2014 does not cover representatives of the flora and fauna, but it will seriously affect the life of the Russian working class. Hooray-patriotism today will not save Russians from the plight of tomorrow. Our task at this difficult time for the country is to explain to everyone who wants to listen what is the essence of the new war unleashed by capital; even if you have to use funny occasions for this.

https://www.rotfront.su/kotam-iz-rossii ... hastvovat/

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Mar 04, 2022 2:25 pm

Image

Remarks on recent events in the Ukraine: An Interim Statement
Posted Mar 04, 2022 by David Harvey

Originally published: Focaal Blog (February 25, 2022 )

This is a provisional text David Harvey prepared for the 2022 American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting. He allowed us, nevertheless, to publish it here because of the escalating Russia-Ukraine crisis.

The outbreak of full-fledged war with the Russian invasion of Ukraine marks a deep turning point in the world order. As such it cannot be ignored by the geographers assembled (alas by zoom) at our annual meeting, I therefore offer some non-expert comments as a basis for discussion.

There is a myth that the world has been at peace since 1945 and that the world order constructed under the hegemony of the United States has largely worked to contain the war-like proclivities of capitalist states in competition with each other. The inter-state competition in Europe that produced two world wars has largely been contained, and West Germany and Japan were peaceably re-incorporated into the capitalist world system after 1945 (in part to combat the threat of Soviet communism). Institutions of collaboration were set up in Europe (the common market, the European Union, NATO, the euro). Meanwhile, “hot” wars (both civil and inter-state) have been waged in abundance since 1945, beginning with the Korean and Vietnam wars followed by the Yugoslav wars and the NATO bombing of Serbia, two wars against Iraq (one of which was justified by patent lies by the U.S. about Iraq’s possession of weapons of mass destruction), the wars in Yemen, Libya, and Syria.

Up until 1991, the Cold War provided a fairly constant background to the functioning of the world order. It was often manipulated to their economic advantage by those U.S. corporations that constitute what Eisenhower long ago referred to as the military industrial complex. Cultivating fear (both fake and real) of the Soviets and Communism was instrumental to this politics. The economic consequence has been wave after wave of technological and organizational innovation in military hardware. Much of these spawned widespread civilian uses, such as aviation, the internet, and nuclear technologies, thus contributing in a major way to the support for endless capital accumulation and the increasing centralization of capitalist power in relation to a captive market.

Furthermore, resort to “military Keynesianism” became a favoured exception in times of difficulty to the neoliberal austerity regimes otherwise periodically administered to the populations of even the advanced capitalist countries after 1970 or so. Reagan’s resort to military Keynesianism to orchestrate an arms race against the Soviet Union played a contributory role in the end of the Cold War at the same time as it distorted the economies of both countries. Before Reagan, the top tax rate in the U.S. never fell below 70 percent while since Reagan the rate has never exceeded forty percent, thus disproving the right wing’s insistence that high taxes inhibit growth. The increasing militarization of the U.S. economy after 1945 also went hand in hand with the production of greater economic inequality and the formation of a ruling oligarchy within the USA as well as elsewhere (even in Russia).

The difficulty Western policy elites face in situations of the current sort in the Ukraine is that short-run and immediate problems need to be addressed in ways that do not exacerbate the underlying roots of conflicts. Insecure people often react violently, for example, but we cannot confront someone coming at us with a knife with soothing words to assuage their insecurities. They need to be disarmed preferably in ways that do not add to their insecurities. The aim should be to lay the basis for a more peaceful, collaborative, and de-militarised world order, while at the same time urgently limiting the terror, the destruction, and the needless loss of life that this invasion entails.

What we are witnessing in the Ukraine conflict is in many respects a product of the processes that dissolved the power of actually existing communism and of the Soviet Regime. With the end of the Cold War, Russians were promised a rosy future, as the benefits of capitalist dynamism and a free market economy would supposedly spread by trickle down across the country. Boris Kagarlitsky described the reality this way. With the end of the Cold War, Russians believed they were headed on a jet plane to Paris only to be told in mid-flight “welcome to Burkina Faso.”

There was no attempt to incorporate the Russian people and economy into the global system as happened in 1945 with Japan and West Germany and the advice from the IMF and leading Western economists (like Jeffrey Sachs) was to embrace neoliberal “shock therapy” as the magic potion for the transition. When that plainly did not work, Western elites deployed the neoliberal game of blaming the victims for not developing their human capital appropriately and not dismantling the many barriers to individual entrepreneurialism (hence tacitly blaming the rise of the oligarchs on the Russians themselves). The internal results for Russia were horrendous. GDP collapsed, the ruble was not viable (money was measured in bottles of vodka), life expectancy declined precipitously, the position of women was debased, there was a total collapse of social welfare and government institutions, the rise of mafia politics around oligarchic power, capped by a debt crisis in 1998 to which there seemed to be no path for an off-ramp other than begging for some crumbs from the rich folks’ table and submitting to the dictatorship of the IMF. The economic humiliation was total, except for the oligarchs. To top it all, the Soviet Union was dismembered into independent republics without much popular consultation.

In two or three years, Russia underwent a shrinkage of its population and economy along with the destruction of its industrial base proportionally more than that experienced through deindustrialization in the older regions of the United States over the preceding forty years. The social, political, and economic consequences of deindustrialization in Pennsylvania, Ohio and throughout the Mid-West have been far-reaching (embracing everything from an Opioid epidemic to the rise of noxious political tendencies supporting white supremacism and Donald Trump). The impact of “shock therapy” upon Russian political, cultural, and economic life was predictably far worse. The West failed to do anything other than gloat at the supposed “end of history” on Western terms.

Then there is the issue of NATO. Originally conceived as both defensive and collaborative, it became a primary war-like military force set up to contain the spread of communism and to prevent inter-state competition in Europe taking a military turn. By and large it helped marginally as a collaborative organizational device mitigating inter-state competition in Europe (though Greece and Turkey have never worked out their differences over Cyprus). The European Union was in practice much more helpful. But with the collapse of the Soviet Union, NATO’s primary purpose disappeared. The threat to the military industrial complex of the U.S. population realizing a “peace dividend” by sharp cuts in the defense budget was real. Perhaps as a result, NATO’s aggressive content (always there) was actively asserted in the Clinton years very much in violation of the verbal promises made to Gorbachov in the early days of perestroika. The U.S. led NATO bombing of Belgrade in 1999 is an obvious example (when the Chinese Embassy was hit, though whether by accident or design is not clear).

The U.S. bombing of Serbia and other U.S. interventions violating the sovereignty of smaller nation states is evoked by Putin as precedent for his actions. The expansion of NATO (in the absence of any clear military threat) up to Russia’s border during these years was strongly questioned even in the U.S., with Donald Trump attacking the logic of NATO’s very existence. Tom Friedman, a conservative commentator writing recently in the New York Times, evokes U.S. culpability for recent events through its aggressive and provocative approach to Russia by way of NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe. In the 1990s it appeared as if NATO was a military alliance in search of an enemy. Putin has now been provoked enough to oblige, obviously angered by the humiliations of Russia’s economic treatment as a basket case and Western dismissive arrogance as to Russia’s place in the global order.

Political elites in the U.S. and the West should have understood that humiliation is a disastrous tool in foreign affairs with often lasting and catastrophic effects. The humiliation of Germany at Versaille played an important role in fomenting World War Two. Political elites avoided repetition of that with respect to West Germany and Japan after 1945 by way of the Marshall Plan only to repeat the catastrophe of humiliating Russia (both actively and inadvertently) after the end of the Cold War. Russia needed and deserved a Marshall Plan rather than lectures on the probity of neoliberal solutions in the 1990s. The century and a half of China’s humiliation by Western Imperialism (extending to that of Japanese occupations and the infamous “rape of Nanjing” in the 1930s) is playing a significant role in contemporary geopolitical struggles. The lesson is simple: humiliate at your peril. It will come back to haunt if not bite you.

None of this justifies Putin’s actions, any more than forty years of deindustrialization and neoliberal labour suppression justifies the actions or positions of Donald Trump. But neither do these actions in the Ukraine justify the resurrection of the institutions of global militarism (such as NATO) that have contributed so much to the creation of the problem. In the same way that the inter-state competition within Europe needed to be demilitarized after 1945, so inter power-bloc armaments races need to be dismantled today and supplanted by strong institutions of collaboration and cooperation. Submitting to the coercive laws of competition, both between capitalist corporations and between power blocs, is the recipe for future disasters, even as it is still regrettably seen by big capital as the supportive pathway for endless capital accumulation in the future.

The danger at a time like this is that the smallest error of judgment on either side can easily escalate into a major confrontation between nuclear powers, in which Russia can hold its own against hitherto overwhelming U.S. military power. The unipolar world U.S. elites inhabited in the 1990s is already now superseded by a bi-polar world. But much else is in flux.

On January 15th, 2003, millions of people all around the world took to the streets to protest the threat of war in what even the New York Times conceded was a startling expression of global public opinion. Lamentably they failed, leading into two decades of wasteful and destructive wars all around the world. It is clear that the people of the Ukraine do not want war, the people of Russia do not want war, the European people do not want war, the peoples of North America do not want yet another war. The popular movement for peace needs to be rekindled, to reassert itself. Peoples everywhere need to assert their right to participate in the creation of the new world order, based in peace, cooperation, and collaboration rather than competition, coercion, and bitter conflict.

https://mronline.org/2022/03/04/remarks ... statement/

***************************************

AFGJ POSITION ON UKRAINE
March 3, 2022

Alliance for Global Justice decries the hostilities in Ukraine that endanger the people of that region and the entire world. Humanity must grow beyond its violent tendencies and substitute true justice for warfare.

The roots of the war in Ukraine lie in decades of NATO expansion that seeks to extend US hegemony over the entire world. This is imperialism, pure and simple. We see the expansion of fascism in Ukraine, the US, UK, and many parts of the European Union. The ugly alliance between fascism and imperialism is a global threat. This threat expands beyond Eastern Europe and threatens sovereignty of many nations especially in Latin America and throughout the Global South.

*End NATO expansions that threaten Russia. The Russian state, as do other nations, has a right to sovereignty and secure borders.
*Uphold Minsk Protocols.
*No US troops on ground in Ukraine region.
*End the use of civilians as fodder for proxy wars between global powers.
*End targeting of civilians by either side.
*We demand the immediate cessation of racist/fascist behavior in Ukraine and at its borders.
*We call for mediation by the world community of nations.
*We call for total nuclear disarmament.

Alliance for Global Justice strives to be what our name says: a setting for people from different regions, different approaches, different cultures to come together to work for justice around the world. Never has the need for alliances or justice been greater than today when we face prospects of international conflict on a level we have not seen in generations, along with a growing threat of nuclear annihilation.

We affirm that peace is not merely a cessation of military action; peace is the presence of justice and security for all parties involved in conflicts. Without justice, there can be no peace. Historical and current violations of human rights must be addressed and remedied.

It is important that we examine the historical and geopolitical factors at work in this conflict. Decades of NATO expansion have threatened Russian borders. We recall the US response to a military and nuclear presence close to its borders when in 1962 Cuba armed itself to deter further US attacks on its land and people. The United States’ reaction was to threaten nuclear attacks on Cuba and the USSR; it brought the world to the brink of annihilation.

Russia and Ukraine share a 1,426-mile border, which is only 400-some miles from Moscow – mere minutes’ traveling distance by missile. If Ukraine were to join NATO, troops and materiel including nuclear-capable weaponry would be staged in Ukraine. Must Russia allow a threat that the United States would not tolerate? Global stability requires that NATO’s expansion must cease.

Likewise, the Minsk accords must be honored. This series of international agreements aimed at ending the longstanding war in the Donbas region of Ukraine. The Minsk Protocol I was drafted in 2014 by Ukraine, Russia, and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) with mediation by the leaders of France and Germany. A subsequent Protocol was ratified in 2015. It consisted of a package of measures, including a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas and restoring control of the state border to the Ukrainian government. Russia and its European neighbors worked out an equitable solution to centuries-old conflicts. Honoring the Minsk treaties is a viable solution to this conflict.

There are at least 750 US military bases in 80 countries around the world. They are the stick used by the United States when the carrots of economic and political threats fail to get the results the US empire desires. These military forces constitute a real and present threat to peace. Certainly, a US military presence in Ukraine or surrounding nations will provoke a negative response from Russia. The world’s two greatest nuclear-armed states cannot engage in armed conflict without risking a cataclysmic situation. Under no circumstances should the US military place ground forces in or around Ukraine.

This raises the ongoing issue of nuclear weapons. A just and sane solution to the constant threat of nuclear annihilation calls for total nuclear disarmament. No exceptions!

Targeting civilian populations and using civilians as shields for military units and instillations is a grievous violation of human rights. We call for an immediate cessation of these actions by all parties.

Numerous reports of racially-motivated violence against non-white immigrants, students and citizens by Ukrainians and at the border with Poland illustrate the ongoing threat of fascism in Ukraine. Attacks upon Jews by Ukranian fascists are horrific and unacceptable. These behaviors should not be glossed over by Ukrainian officials. Commentary by European and US officials and reporters frequently references the fact that Ukrainians are white, Christian Europeans and therefore should not be targets of violence or upheaval. White supremacy is unacceptable in any setting. We ask the Biden administration to advocate for the people in Ukraine who are under attack by Ukrainian fascists.

Diplomatic solutions are preferable to military responses. We urge the United States, Russia, Ukraine, and the provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk to participate in mediation and to abide by the decisions made in that setting.

AfGJ also notes the vital role that Russia plays in support of liberation struggles. Specifically, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, and other nations that endure US embargoes and blockades rely upon Russia for material support and trade. Colombia, NATO’s only partner in Latin America, has made unfounded accusations that Russia has been funding protests in Colombia and advising troop movements in Venezuela. On March 1, 2022, Colombia and the US began military exercises in the Caribbean that, for the first time ever, involve a nuclear submarine. Colombia’s Defense Minister said the exercises were “within the scope of NATO”. We denounce the expansion of NATO and its wars into Latin America. The embargoes, impoundments of funds and no-fly policies are wreaking harm on nations and peoples with whom we stand in solidarity.

https://afgj.org/afgj-position-on-ukraine

It should be noted that Ukraine and the US have been the main obstacle to Minsk II. The people of Donbass weren't keen on the idea of rejoining Nazi Kiev either. Only the Russians and Western Europeans wanted it and that was not enough.

**************************************

Without Even Realizing How We Were Being Played. Could This Be Russiagate's Checkmate?
Jacqueline Luqman 02 Mar 2022

Image
Bagley Salt Lake Tribune

Tales of Donald Trump collusion with Vladimir Putin absolved the democrats of electoral blame, and supported the war party in its attacks on Russia. Yet it was the democratic administration of Barack Obama which first made common cause with the Ukrainian right wing and set the stage for military conflict.

Well, it only took six years. Six years for the Democratic Party to weaponize Russiagate into not just a way to blame and shame Black voters for the spectacular loss that Hillary Clinton suffered against The-Candidate-Who-Couldn’t-Have-Ever-Won-If-Hillary-Had- Actually-Campaigned-Like-She-Wanted-to-Earn-People’s-Votes-Instead-Of-Thinking- She-Was- Entitled-To-Them: Donald Trump. Six years of US corporate media mouthpieces telling Americans that Hillary lost because Black voters were duped by Rainbow Bernie Bikini posts, shoe ads, and “Like if You Love Jesus” posts that convinced them to either not vote, or to vote for Trump.

Four years of “Look What You Blacks Did In Not Helping Elect Hillary” - having Black women on these corporate news outlets trash Black men for a slight uptick in Black men who voted Republican for Trump, as if the massive support Trump received from white women voters wasn’t what really drove him into office in the states that mattered most.

All the trashing of Black men who voted for Trump and the endless analyzing what was wrong with them that they would do such a thing, how this was yet another way that Black men didn't protect Black women - while no one talked about the equally small uptick in Black women who voted for Trump. The small increase among both voter demographics probably would have never been enough to feed an entire news cycle and launch a new branch of “Why Black Men Ain't Shit-ism.” But this time it did.

Then we got four years of Look-At-What-You-Radicals-Who-Didn't-Vote-Let-Putin-Put- In-The-White-House, Look-At-What-You-Too-Good-To-Vote-Radicals-Did-Now-Trump-Is-Colluding-With Putin, Look-At-Putin’s-Puppet-Making-Trump-Do-All-Of-Those-Things-That-Hillary- Would-Have-Done-If-You-Radicals-Had-Bothered-To-Vote. All this was in addition to the constant reminders that it was the “traitorous” Black Voters and Silly-Radicals-Who- Made-Hillary-Lose-In-The-First-Place.

It was an endless, incessant, ceaseless drumbeat from white and Black corporate media pundits and Democratic politicians alike, and it was nauseating. But I often wondered what the point was because surely the Democrats weren’t THAT upset at losing an election they didn’t even try to win. I wondered what was the purpose for their dogged commitment to framing Black people and radicals tired of the Democratic Party - as well as the Republicans - as the willing dupes of Putin for six whole years? And why, I’m sure you’re wondering, am I bringing it up now?

Well, do you notice that, suddenly, everyone who was once critical of the US regarding issues like the invasion of Iraq on the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie, the US lies about Syria, the blackout in US media of the horrific war in Yemen, the continued support by the US government of the apartheid regime in Israel, the 20-year senseless and destructive and expensive quagmire of the US war in Afghanistan - are somehow not critical of the US role in the conflict in Ukraine?

So many of those people on the so-called left who were critical of the US and its propaganda outlets for the lies told about those things and more - like the silence on Biden’s continued hateful immigration policies; his COVID policies that are no better than Trump’s; his reneging on the COVID relief checks that were promised - now suddenly believe every word from the US government, the Biden Administration, and corporate media, the very same government and media they were criticizing just a few weeks ago. And why? Or, shall I ask, how? The six years of the “Putinization” of the American psyche, that’s how.

Here we are watching Ghanaian , Nigerian , Brazilian , Indian nationals denied exit from Ukraine to safety as Ukrainians are waved through. Yet, liberals and imperialism ignoring leftists have not only dismissed the brutality against those people, but they also try to bash anti-imperialists for being Putins’ new puppets because we refuse to tow the US/EU/NATO line that Putin alone is responsible for this war.

Many of the foreigners in Ukraine, who are among those seeking refuge in other countries, are students from at least ten countries who went to study in Ukraine rather than in more expensive Western European countries or in the US . Many have received very little support from their governments’ embassies to leave Ukraine. They are on their own to figure out how to get to, and ultimately cross, the border into Poland or Hungary where they can board flights home. But leaving Ukraine has proven impossible for thousands who have been turned away at train stations and the border to those neighboring countries by Ukrainian soldiers who, media reports say, are “prioritizing Ukrainians.”

That is really a very sanitized way of saying that non-Europeans are shoved to the back of the line. The African Union issued a statement that pointedly raises the issue of racism toward African refugees from Ukraine at border crossings , but they seemed to be the only entity making such a statement at the time of this writing. None of this should be a surprise, however. We have established that Ukraine is quite literally rife with neo-Nazis.

But masses of anti-war activists and so-called leftists in the US have now decided that war isn’t so bad, that the US is without any complicity in Ukraine, that US media is truthful about it, and that there are no neo-Nazis in the Ukrainian army because the country’s current president, Volodymyr Zelensky, is of Jewish heritage. Even though independent and implicitly anti-imperialist media outlets have been raising the alarm about the coup in Ukraine directed by Barack Obama and Joseph Biden in 2014 and facilitated by John McCain and Victoria Nuland, posing for pictures on stage with, passing out cookies to, and negotiating with the very fascists who co-opted and turned the Maidan Square protests into a massacre to be the “tip of the spear” to overthrow elected president Viktor Yanukovych.

There is widespread denial among US mainstream media of neo-Nazis in Ukraine today, even though they were connected to the 2017 fascist murder of Heather Heyer and the serious wounding of several anti-racist protesters in Charlottesville, VA. In fact, it was widely reported that social media was a forum through which the neo-Nazi Azov Batallion made connections with fascist extremists in the US. Jacobin magazine, reported that a 2018 FBI affidavit asserted that Azov “is believed to have participated in training and radicalizing United States-based white supremacy organizations,” including members of the white supremacist Rise Above Movement, prosecuted for planned assaults on counterprotesters at far-right events, including the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally. But for folks who don’t read Jacobin, TIME magazine also reported these connections , as did ProPublica , Buzzfeed news , and even The Hill . This information was so widely known and accepted that a publication from the United States Military Academy at West Point, the Combatting Terrorism Center Sentinel, even documented evidence of the presence of neo-Nazis in Ukraine and their connection to fascists in the US . All of these publications explicitly mention white supremacist groups in Ukraine, and many name the Azov Batallion specifically.

But nothing can be more public and visible than the effort by the late Rep. John Conyers to stop funding to the Azov Batallion and other fascist groups in Ukraine after the 2014 coup.

The Nation magazine reported that in mid-December 2015, Congress passed a 2,000 page omnibus bill for the fiscal year 2016 that included “64 billion for overseas contingency operations” for, among other things, assisting “European countries facing Russian aggression. The presence of neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine was widely known then, not only by the media, but also, obviously, by US lawmakers. As a result, Congressmen John Conyers of Michigan and Ted Yoho of Florida drew up an amendment to the House Defense Appropriations bill (HR 2685) that was to “limit arms, training, and other assistance to the neo-Nazi Ukrainian militia, the Azov Battalion.” The bill passed unanimously in the House and the Senate but was ultimately removed from the final appropriations bill . The official reason given was that there already existed a mechanism - the Leahy Law - that would have denied govt funding to any foreign unit or group that the State Department believes commit gross violations of human rights.

But no fascist group in Ukraine was ever documented by the US as having committed gross violations of human rights. Not even the fascists who massacred protesters and police during the Maidan Protests in 2014.

The State Department has never even acknowledged that the Maidan Square Massacre was committed by neo-Nazis. But the international military arm of US imperialism, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), went further and made the argument through its pubic relations and propaganda apparatus, the Atlantic Council, that the Azov Batallion should NOT be designated a foreign terrorist organization because its members allegedly distanced themselves from neo-Nazi ideologies. Yet, a few weeks later, the Atlantic Council published another article refuting the claim that the Azov Battalion had reformed and moved away from their fascist political ideologies.

Why the renewed attention to the US/NATO dirty little Nazi secret from 2014 in 2022? Because, according to a February 2020 op-ed written by Congressman Max Rose of New York and former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) special agent Ali H. Soufan, fascist violence in the US was connected to that in the Ukraine. The Atlantic Council even admitted to Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem as early as 2018 in an article titled, Ukraine’s Got a Real Problem with Far-Right Violence (And No, (RT) Didn’t Write This Headline) . Despite their futile later efforts, even NATO’s propaganda arm could not ignore the problem they helped create by legitimizing neo-Nazis in Ukraine. But today in the US, according to a whole bunch of people who suddenly have faith in the veracity of the US and its vast constellation of state-run media outlets, those neo-Nazis do not and never have existed in the country, because Zelensky is Jewish, among other ridiculous and uninformed reasons.

But John Conyers tweeted about the amendment in 2015. “House passed my amendment to prohibit assistance to Azov Battalion—a far-right white supremacist militia at front lines of Ukraine conflict.”

And that tweet just hits different in the face of everyone’s disbelief in the neo-Nazi influence in Ukraine today. You and I may forget, some may pretend that they have forgotten, but Twitter never forgets, and Twitter is forever.

So, when taken together, what do all of these issues mean as the crisis in Ukraine intensifies? It means that manufacturing the consent of this US/NATO imperialist aggression against Russia (by way of Ukraine) took six years and, who knows how much money, to pull off.

The Democratic Party targeted Black voters and Black radicals as the ill-informed and easily duped fools tricked by the slick social media machinations of Putin. The tying of the hated Donald Trump to the endless allegations of collusion with the same guy who tricked the Blacks into giving Trump the presidency (to be clear, Donald Trump is absolutely loathsome, but for reasons that are solely his own doing). Something not addressed in this article but certainly noteworthy is the complete refusal by Congress to conduct any serious investigation into the shady business arrangement between Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian oil company, Burisma, where Hunter Bident “worked,” earning $50,000 a month even though he had no prior experience in that field.

Brushed off by Democrats and much of the US corporate media as the scandal that "turned out not to be" - but only because they refused to seriously pursue it - I contend that had any real investigation been conducted, the clue for the coup in 2014 would have been revealed, and the January 6 investigation committee or…whatever it is…would have had to have issued subpoenas for themselves and nearly all of their colleagues. Because as you should see by now, they all knew that the US propped up neo-Nazis in Ukraine in 2014 and have been funding and supporting them ever since, and will continue to do so - but this time, with the full-throated emotional backing of Americans who can't stand to see innocent white people caught in the crosshairs of war .

I don’t know how much all of this skullduggery cost, but I’d say those who have been protected by it got their money’s worth, the way so many in this country are now all in for imperialism having fully turned on the real anti-imperialist left.

And all they had to do was tell Americans that Putin is their problem - not US warmongering, militarism, imperialism through its weaponized international gang NATO - and do it nearly every day on every media outlet for just six years.

Without even realizing how we were being played, this could be Russiagate’s checkmate.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/witho ... -checkmate

***********************************************

Russia Believes Kiev Delays Negotiations

Image
Russian Spokesman Dmitry Peskov. March. 3, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@Eng24Kg

Published 3 March 2022

Russian spokesman says that Ukraine is not in a hurry with the talks.

On Thursday, Russian Spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia has reason to believe Ukraine is setting back talks.

Peskov noted that Ukraine is not in a hurry with the talks, noting that Ukrainian negotiators have arrived late to the peace talks held in Belarus. He remarked that the delegation from Russia arrived at the destination on Wednesday and had to wait for the Ukrainian side for a day and a half.

The diplomat was asked about how Russia feels regarding the change of the venue, to which the spokesmen replied that the venue is not important; what matters is reaching an agreement based on the balance of both sides' interests.

The spokesman disclosed that Moscow highly appreciates Belarus for hosting the first round of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in such excellent conditions.


Peskov also said that it is essential to seize every opportunity to solve the ongoing crisis in Eastern Europe as soon as possible. The priority is communication and the content of the negotiations, he added. However, the spokesman underlined that this is not a matter for public discussion.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0016.html

****************************************

Ukraine: The Afghan Solution
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MARCH 3, 2022
Guadi Calvo

Image

The saying: “Truth is the first victim of war,” has been verified in the Ukrainian conflict like few times, in which the international media decided to hide the reasons for Moscow’s decision to definitively stop the war that the Kiev regime, as NATO’s spearhead, is waging against the pro-Russian republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, which has been going on for eight years and has left more than fifteen thousand civilians dead, in addition to the constant harassment by the United States and its European partners on the borders of the Russian Federation, which in turn decided with this action to put a definitive end to these policies by preventing Ukraine from joining NATO.

Since its founding in 1949, Ukraine had only one goal: The destruction of the Soviet Union, which they achieved in 1991, but they would attempt to do the same with any other form of national continuity, which upsets the unipolarity that the United States has enjoyed since then and which was rightly broken by President Vladimir Putin in Syria in August 2013 after the false flag plot, which sought to hold President Bashar al-Assad responsible for the chemical weapons attack against civilians in the Damascus neighborhood of al-Ghouta. This was something that Barack Obama considered sufficient to openly intervene in the conflict, which had been going on for three years and had not been resolved in his favor.

President Putin’s stern warning quickly dissuaded Washington, setting off one of the most shocking reversals on record. Since then, Russia and President Putin have been on the rise in international politics, not yet as representative as in Soviet times, but enough to end unipolarity and earn the undying hatred of the State Department, which regards the Russian president as its greatest enemy.

Ukraine, by its own choice, has become the battleground for this new cold war, which as we now see, has reached tropical temperatures. The Russian incursion, which in a few moments eliminated almost eighty of the targets to be destroyed, among them air force, navy, airports, facilities such as bridges, command and control centers, including the Turkish Bayraktar drone fleet, is protracted in urban areas to generate as few civilian casualties as possible.

This gives the Atlanticist press time to highlight Russian losses – one thousand, two thousand, three thousand men, hundreds of armored vehicles, dozens of helicopters and aircraft. This did not stop Ukrainian President Volodymir Zelenski from reporting, by all possible means, that NATO had left him alone, only to later announce that he was willing to meet with President Putin, only to soon afterwards say that he was not willing to meet with President Putin, no doubt in response to a tug of the State Department’s ear. Now, however, it appears that he has again agreed to meet with Putin’s envoy on the border with Belarus.

This is without caring about the citizens of his country who, imbued with a Russophobic spirit, carefully sculpted by million-dollar media campaigns, have responded to the call to arm themselves with whatever they have to resist the “invader.” No doubt a heroic gesture by many Ukrainians, who have been unable or unwilling to recognize that the real invaders are those who since 2013 have been promising them eternal love, i.e. income, to the European Union and NATO and who, when it comes down to it, just send them weapons or helmets, as in the case of Germany, always pragmatic. While several countries in white Europe have already made it known that they will apply restrictive measures for those seeking refuge, it is estimated that more than five million Ukrainians are trying to leave their country, so the UK has just announced that it will not accept Ukrainian refugees who do not have direct relatives already established in Perfidious Albion.

Many consider that days after the Russian operation in Ukraine, its progress has been extremely slow due to local resistance, without being interested in understanding that this slowness, which is not so slow, is due to the fact that the fighting is taking place in the suburbs of Kiev and has all but taken over the country’s second city, Kharkiv, with just over two million inhabitants. Putin necessarily wants to minimize civilian casualties as much as possible, which Joe Biden desperately needs, and his new parrot Volodymir Zelenski, who from sarcasm to tears has implemented all the acting baggage that his years as a clown have given him, to show the world the perversity of this new Hitler, emerging from the substrata of the Siberian kingdom or perhaps from someone much worse, a revered Stalin. So, given Putin’s complacency to avoid images of civilians crushed by Russian bombs and tanks, the end of the action will no doubt be several days further away.

For now, the West’s measures, other than sending weapons, have not gone beyond economic sanctions in an attempt to break Russia, knowing that from a military standpoint they will not succeed if NATO intends to resolve the issue only within Ukraine’s borders.

THE GRANDCHILDREN OF STEFAN BANDERAS

Alongside the first movements encouraged by the US State Department in Ukraine, which for months were based in Euromaidam or Independence Square in central Kiev, until the fall of President Viktor Yanukovych in 2014, the protesters spared no expense: From using snipers to murder both civilians who opposed the coup and police officers, to unfurling the old National Socialist flags so proudly flown by Stefan Banderas, the Ukrainian henchman of Adolf Hitler, who together with the paramilitary commandos of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) perpetrated genocide on the scale of his spiritual guide elsewhere in Europe, while operating against the Red Army, slaughtering Poles, and continued his ideology until he was finally and happily eliminated in Munich in what is believed to be a KGB operation.

Since the fall of Yanukovych, who had banned the cult of Banderas, the figure of the Nazi leader has been enthroned in successive Ukrainian governments, including that of Zelensky. With his image at the head, Ukrainian fascists articulated in paramilitary organizations such as the Azov Battalion, Práviy séctor (Right Sector) and other terrorist groups, have advanced against the Donetsk and Lugansk Republics, where they have left no crime to commit, accompanied and protected by the Ukrainian army.

It is with these fascist elements together with the Ukrainian army’s potential despoilers, to which will be added the Western mercenaries supplied by American Blackwater or whatever it is now called and the infallible Wahhabi mujahideen, ever so omnipresent wherever the CIA sends them, will be the protagonists of a second phase of the war that NATO, through Zelenski, has declared on Moscow.

Of course, if the conflict does not escalate into a full-scale war between Russia and NATO (President Putin has already ordered the nuclear deterrent forces to go on high alert) and with no need for front men, the Atlanticists will establish an Afghan-style war, where militiamen trained, funded and supplied by Washington and NATO will be the main protagonists of a second phase of the war. Ukraine is the largest country in Europe, not counting Russia, with whom it shares a 1580-kilometer border that will have to be watched tirelessly by Russian security, which is well aware of the Afghan solution that has yielded so much to its enemies.

Guadi Calvo is an Argentinean writer and journalist. He is an international analyst specializing in Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/03/ ... -solution/

***************************************************

President Zelensky and Mayor Goode
March 3, 2022 Stephen Millies


Image
Aftermath of Philadelphia police bombing of MOVE house on May 13, 1985.

While landlords are raising rents by 40%, the capitalist media wants you to hate Russia. They are trying to turn Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into a folk hero.

Zelensky is a professional clown. He played the role of a Ukrainian president in a TV sitcom.

He was selected to be an actual president because U.S. imperialism needed a new look in Ukraine. Wasn’t that the role of José Napoleón Duarte in El Salvador during the 1980s?

He was cheated out of winning El Salvador’s 1972 presidential election by vote fraud. Duarte was later tortured and sentenced to death.

None of this prevented him from being the face of a bloody military regime that carried out the orders of the Pentagon.

When Duarte was a civilian president of a military junta, more than 800 people were murdered in the village of El Mozote. Most of the victims of this December 1981 massacre were children.

The Reagan administration desperately needed the atrocity to be covered up. They remembered how the My Lai massacre in Vietnam turned millions against that war.

Reagan was assisted by not only Duarte but also the New York Times. Because of their truthful reporting, Raymond Bonner at the Times and Alma Guillermoprieto at the Washington Post were viciously attacked by the right wing. Bonner was driven out by the Times’ management.

Today the New York Times and the Washington Post are among the loudest voices in the hate Russia chorus. They’re much more influential in winning liberals and progressive people to NATO’s war drive than Fox News ever could be. The killing of over 14,000 people in the Donbass republics by the Ukrainian regime is hardly ever mentioned by the media.

Duarte defeated the openly fascist Roberto D’Aubuisson in El Salvador’s 1984 presidential election. This gave an excuse to many Democratic Party members of Congress to give billions to the killers in El Salvador’s military.

Who are the ones with the guns?

Zelensky is allowed to stay in Kiev’s Mariinsky Palace because of his usefulness to Wall Street and European banksters. Millions of Ukrainians voted for Zelensky in 2019 because they thought he would stop the fascist gangs terrorizing Ukraine.

The fact that Zelensky is Jewish is used as alleged proof that fascism in Ukraine isn’t a big problem anymore. After Barack Obama was elected U.S. president, many media commentators claimed racism in the United States wasn’t much of a problem either.

The Black Lives Matter movement proved that to be a lie. Obama was put in the White House because a large section of the ruling class felt they needed a new brand for their empire.

Tens of millions of people rejoiced when the first U.S. Black president was elected. It also made it easier for the Pentagon to attack the African country of Libya than if some obvious racist had been in office.

While Zelensky is the figurehead seen on TV, fascists like those in the Azov Battalion and Right Sector have been brought into the Ukrainian army and police. One of the factors that allowed JFK’s assassination was that half of the Dallas cops were Ku Klux Klan members.

The Deep State is the real state. Lenin pointed this out in “The State and Revolution.” When Gen. Milley responded to Trump’s attempted coup by saying “we’re the ones with the guns,” he was expressing a Marxist truth.

Image
Ukrainian neo-Nazis burn the Odessa House of Trade Unions on May 2, 2014.

The Odessa and Philadelphia massacres

Five years before Zelensky assumed office on May 20, 2019, at least 48 people at the House of Trade Unions in Odessa were murdered on May 2, 2014. Neo-Nazis prevented people from escaping. Many were burned to death.

It shows he fascist character of the Euromaidan movement’s leadership that the union hall was attacked. None of the criminals who carried out this atrocity have been prosecuted. Leftists were arrested instead.

Zelensky has done nothing to seek justice for the victims of this massacre, just as he has allowed the deadly shelling of the Donbass republics. Justice will only be carried out by Ukrainian leftists assisted by soldiers of the Russian Federation.

Six adults and five children were killed by Philadelphia police when the MOVE house was bombed on May 13, 1985. The cops were assisted by FBI agents and the Pentagon in dropping the bomb from a helicopter.

When Wilson Goode―Philadelphia’s first Black mayor―got up that morning, he wasn’t thinking 11 Black people would be killed along with the burning of four city blocks.

It was Philadelphia’s police chief who gave the order to “let it burn,” preventing the fire department from putting out the fire. But Mayor Goode still bears a responsibility for these murders.

The communist leader Sam Marcy could have added this terrorist crime as an appendix to his pamphlet “Generals Over the White House.” He might have entitled it “Cops Over City Hall.”

“Neutrality” is a cop-out

President Vladimir Putin was forced to intervene in Ukraine in order to stop it from being a NATO base aimed at the Russian Federation. If this had happened, the next step would have been World War 3.

The entire imperialist metropolis led by the United States has issued severe sanctions against Russia. These include seizing Russian assets and cutting off Russian banks from the SWIFT financial clearing system. Sanctions are acts of war.

Sincere pacifists may condemn all wars, but revolutionaries know that some wars are progressive and indeed necessary. For socialists and communists to condemn “both sides” in the current crisis is a cop-out.

The world was horrified at the MOVE bombing. But some wanted to blame one of the victims, MOVE leader John Africa, for this terrorist act.

These liberals also refused to defend Mumia Abu-Jamal, a revolutionary who has been imprisoned for 40 years and whom the capitalist state wanted to execute.

U.S. imperialism will not defeat itself. Revolutionaries have the right to accept assistance from anybody.

Soviet socialism was tragically overthrown and Russian Federation President Putin is no Lenin. Yet right now Russia’s armed forces are playing an indispensable role in rescuing the Donbass republics and Ukrainian workers from fascist terror.

It does no good to sit on the sidelines. Victory to the Donbass republics and their allies!

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2022/ ... yor-goode/

****************************************

The War Will Not End With Russian Control of Ukraine: It’s Just the Beginning
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MARCH 3, 2022
Elijah J. Magnier

Image

“It is time for the US nuclear weapons in Europe to return back to America.” The Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov summed up the Russian roadmap beyond Ukraine. This means that the Russian battle has begun because America has strategic nuclear forces in NATO bases spread across the European continent, including Turkey (which possesses fifty nuclear bombs at the Incirlik base under US ‘control’). Seemingly, the options ahead are much more defiant and complex than a « simple » war on Ukraine because the countries that Russia said should be denuclearised are NATO members.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation was created in 1949 by the US, Canada and other European countries to provide security against the Soviet Union and combat communism. In reaction to the integration of West Germany into NATO in 1955, the Warsaw Pact (the Soviet Union, Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Romania) was created. Following the end of the Cold War between the Soviets and the US, the Warsaw Pact was dissolved, but NATO was not. Several former Warsaw Pact members joined NATO after March 1999, notwithstanding the promises (which were neither treaties nor signed agreements) given by western officials, mainly the US, that NATO won’t expand “one inch eastward”.

Russia spent the last two decades building its strength and believed itself ready to confront the US in asking it to drop its spread of nuclear weapons in the former Soviet Union European countries. NATO claims to defend its members and protect European allies against missile threats outside the Euro-Atlantic area. However, the UN security council did not authorise the US occupation of Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria. The US (and its allies) doesn’t heed or need any authorisation to use its deadly force anywhere it chooses in the world. Therefore, NATO can only be an advanced US base in Europe, keeping the European leaders within its “club” under control and rallying behind the US objectives. Indeed, the US – conveniently – evoked Monroe’s 1823 doctrine, which told European countries how to handle their foreign affairs. Because of the US expansionist policy in Europe, Russia has decided that it has the power and will use it to stop it before it is too late.

It is not difficult to ascertain whether Minister Lavrov is raising the ceiling of Russian demands and is serious about revealing Russia’s insistent requests for the US disarmament of dozens of bases spread across Europe. Indeed, this fits with President Vladimir Putin’s demands, who requested, before the war began, that NATO return to what it was before 1997, that is, with only 12 members and the exit of the 16 members (excluding Turkey) who joined subsequently, from 1999 and until 2020.

It is unclear how President Putin intends to implement his goals, even if he seems serious. Thus, he asked his strategic nuclear force to be fully prepared in response to the West’s call to arm Ukraine and provide it with more weapons to prolong the war.

It is to be noted from the statements of Russian leaders that they are fully prepared for confrontation and solidarity behind President Vladimir Putin, contrary to what President Joe Biden would prefer. The US is trying to show the war as if it were one person’s decision, the Russian president alone, as previous US Presidents did in Iraq (Saddam Hussein’s regime) and Syria (President Bashar al-Assad’s regime). The terminology “Putin’s regime” is now widely used.

When Europe boasted about its sanctions against Russia, former Russian President and Security Council Vice President Dmitry Medvedev warned France:“Some French ministers said they have declared an economic war against Russia. Watch your language, gentlemen! And don’t forget that in the history of mankind, economic wars have often turned into real wars.”

Europe has lessened its enthusiasm for sending lethal weapons to Ukraine. In fact, Poland announced that it would not allow the transfer of aircraft and deadly weapons to Ukraine. It is worth noting that the US has a military base in Poland within NATO and that such a Polish decision to defuse the situation was certainly issued by a joint leadership.

The US has played the most significant role in fueling the war and inviting Ukraine to continue fighting, especially since the Pentagon announced that it was “helping” Ukraine manage the conflict through its military facilities. This is further evidence that the battle is not Ukrainian/Russian, but American/Russian on Ukrainian territory: this began quite some time ago, with the knowledge of all parties.

In April last year, the Kremlin pushed about 30,000 troops to the Ukrainian border. In August of last year, the number rose to 70,000, according to the US Director of General Intelligence, John Ratcliffe. He specifically accused President Joe Biden of not listening to U.S. intelligence reports that warned him that Putin was serious about Ukraine.

Russia has expressed its limits and intent in its effort to have a neutrality pact or move into Ukraine to prevent the establishment of nuclear weapons in a bordering country. Russian forces control many of Ukraine’s nuclear reactors, which total more than fifteen, scattered in the south, east, center and west.

Russia claims that the U.S. planned to restart some of these nuclear reactors to obtain highly enriched uranium to produce nuclear weapons and prevent Russia from interfering in Ukraine. Consequently, Russia considered that the danger continued to grow. Today, more than ever, Moscow possesses the strength to confront U.S. expansion through NATO, which no previous Russian president could do.

The world witnessed a similar crisis in 1962, when America invaded the Bay of Pigs to overthrow Fidel Castro. The Soviet Union deployed medium-range ballistic missiles in Cuba near American shores. And in October of this year, the United States discovered that Russia was building a nuclear missile base in Cuba, just as President Putin said the U.S. was planning in Ukraine.

However, the current crisis is much more serious than 1962 because weapons have evolved and become more precise. Nuclear weapons have been spread to many parts of the world and are no longer confined to Western countries and Russia.

It is a difficult world indeed to live in, waiting for the end of the war in Ukraine and the revelation of a Western plan that will come after Russia’s entry into Kiev. The West has many rabbits in its hat, but Putin has not engaged in this war to withdraw without achieving his country’s goals. He seems more determined than ever to end not only the war in Ukraine, but to go far beyond that.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/03/ ... beginning/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Mar 04, 2022 6:23 pm

Briefly about Ukraine. 04.08.2022
March 4, 20:49

Image

Briefly about Ukraine. 04.08.2022


1. Kyiv. Fighting in Bucha and in the Gostomel area. Fighting is going on west of Kyiv. Gradually, the city is pressed in from the east. Chernihiv is blocked. Negotiations are underway on a humanitarian corridor. Fighting in the north of the city.

2. Kharkov is practically blocked by the RF Armed Forces. MLRS of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are actively working from the city, striking incl. and residential areas of the city. The RF Armed Forces continue their methodical hunt for concentrations of infantry and equipment that the enemy hides in the city.

3. Mariupol. The ring around the city is gradually shrinking. The city itself is physically completely blocked. The Nazis are blocking the exit of the population from the city. The deputy commander of Azov reports that the situation is critical and Mariupol is the last obstacle to the creation of a land bridge to the Crimea. He asks for the deblockade of the city.

4. Nikolaev. Fight for the city. Fighting south of the city. An incomprehensible situation with the Kulbakino airfield: it was first stated that the RF Armed Forces had taken it, and then the Armed Forces of Ukraine were able to recapture it. From the places they write that it was generally empty. The flagship of the Ukrainian Navy "Hetman Sahaydachny" was flooded by the team on the first day of the operation.

5. Energodar and ZNPP. Control is finally established. Fighting continues at Vasilievka. The Pologi are occupied, which opens up the possibility of a strike on Gulyaipole.

6. Raisins. Serious fights. The troops are approaching Slavyansk and the Izyum-Slavyansk highway. Krasny Liman and Yampol are not far away.

7. Severodonetsk. Fighting near the city, the city itself has not yet entered. The prospects for the formation of the Severodonetsk pocket are growing. Most of the territory of the LPR has already been liberated. It remains to weld in the boiler the last large grouping of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the LPR.

8. Donetsk-Gorlovka. They continued to receive heavy shelling. Destruction and casualties.

9. Volnovakha. The cleanup, according to Pushilin, will take several days. The enemy suffered heavy losses in men and equipment in the Volnovakha area.

10. Transnistria. The Armed Forces of Ukraine blew up a bridge on the border with the republic in order to impede the hypothetical participation of a group of Russian troops in the PMR in the operation to liberate Odessa. No one is still landing amphibious assaults in the Odessa region, although they have been waiting there for a week.

Putin again confirmed today that the operation will continue until the Russian Federation achieves all its goals. There will be no concessions.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7475582.html

Google Translator

****************************************

‘The blood in Ukraine is on Washington’s hands’
March 4, 2022 Press TV

Political analyst Bill Dores says Washington engineered “the Ukraine crisis in order to hurt not only Russia but the emerging bloc of countries seeking economic independence from the United States.”

“The corporate shills in Washington know that only war and destruction can maintain the outsized hold of Corporate America and the dollar in the world economy. It is part of a 30-year war to regain a stranglehold on the world’s energy resources,” he stated.

Dores, a writer for Struggle-La Lucha and longtime antiwar activist, said, “Ukraine’s blood is on U.S. and NATO hands.” He made the remarks in an interview with Press TV on Thursday after U,S, President Joe Biden praised the Ukrainian people as a “wall of strength” against Russia’s military action in their country, in his State of the Union address on Tuesday.

“Six days ago, Russia’s Vladimir Putin sought to shake the foundations of the free world thinking he could make it bend to his menacing ways. But he badly miscalculated,” Biden said.

“He thought he could roll into Ukraine and the world would roll over. Instead, he met a wall of strength he never imagined. He met the Ukrainian people,” he continued.

Putin last week announced a “special military operation” in Ukraine’s Donbass region to “defend people” subjected to “genocide” there against government forces, stressing that Moscow has “no plans to occupy Ukrainian territory.”

Biden called the Russian action an “unprovoked and unjustified attack,” and the U.S. media described it as the biggest assault on a European state since World War Two assault by Russia.

U.S. engineered ‘the Ukraine crisis to hurt Russia’

“I definitely think the United States engineered the Ukraine crisis in order to hurt Russia and by extension the entire emerging Eurasian economic bloc. The U.S. didn’t leave Russia much choice but to act,” Dores said.

He said, “The striking thing about the ‘hate Russia’ rally Biden led on Capitol Hill on March 1 was its triumphal character. It was nauseating to watch Democrat and Republican politicians, every one of them on the corporate pad, decked out in blue and gold of Ukraine.”

“Every one of them had voted for the murder of millions in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Somalia, Western Sahara, the Philippines and elsewhere. Every one of them had voted to plunder working class and oppressed communities in the United States to pay for endless wars for corporate profit,” he stated.

“Indeed that very day, the Saudi kingdom attacked Yemen again with U.S.-made planes, missiles and bombs. Nearly 400,000 people have died in that US-sponsored war. Biden promised to end it when he came into office. He lied,” he added.

“Also March 1, U.S.-funded Israeli occupation forces invaded a refugee camp in Jenin, murdering three people. Two 13-year-olds are among those martyred by Israeli troops on the West Bank in the past few days. Every single politician on the Hill that night has voted to fund the endless war against the people of Palestine,” he continued.

“With a straight face, Biden praised US troops who are still illegally in Iraq and Syria while condemning Russia’s military operation in Ukraine,” he pointed out.

“On Tuesday the Capitol Hill gang was happy. War stocks were up. So were the stocks and profits of the energy monopolies. West Europe was back under Washington’s thumb. Congress had an excuse to deny even more money to people’s needs and spend it on war,” Dores noted.

U.S. politicians don’t care for the people of Ukraine

“They cared nothing for the people of Ukraine except as cannon fodder in a proxy war against Russia, a war that Washington has engineered deliberately and carefully. And their proxy war against Russia is also aimed at China, Bolivia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Iran, Nicaragua, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe — at the emerging bloc of nations seeking economic independence from U.S. banks and corporate monopolies,” Dores said.

“In his speech, Biden couldn’t help but take credit. ‘We were ready,’ he said. ‘We prepared extensively and carefully.’ Last summer, in violation of the Minsk agreements, the U.S. and other NATO countries resurrected a plan to bring Ukraine into NATO. That would mean U.S. and West European troops and missiles on Russia’s border,” he stated.

“On Feb. 17, the Pentagon ordered its Ukrainian mercenaries to launch a full-scale offensive against the independent republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. They knew Russia would have little choice but to respond,” he said.

“The Western corporate media hides the fact that this battle did not begin last week. It has raged for eight years. 14,000 people have died in the Kiev regime’s war against the mostly Russian-speaking people of Donetsk and Lugansk,” he pointed out.

“It began in 2014, when a coup organized from the U.S. embassy installed a rightwing, Russophobic regime in Kiev. Neo-Nazi groups like Pravdiy Sektor and Svoboda Party were part of the U.S. operation. Their militias began an ‘ethnic cleansing’ campaign against the Russian-speaking people of Donbas in eastern Ukraine. At least 50 protesters were burned to death in Odessa when these gangs set fire to the trade union headquarters,” he said.

“In response, the people of Donetsk and Lugansk declared independence. Like the people of Gaza, they are under siege for their choice at the ballot box,” he explained.

“Had Russian troops simply gone to defend those areas, Washington and Kiev would still scream invasion, and they would be attacked with all the weapons systems the U.S. has given Kiev. Had Russia allowed a massacre to happen and Ukraine to join NATO, they would face a much bigger war in the near future. Because the only reason for NATO expansion is war,” the analyst said.

“The Russian military operation is not like the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which Joe Biden supported. Russia is not destroying water pumping stations, power plants, sewage systems, telephones. Despite unsubstantiated headlines in Western media, they are targeting military infrastructure. Nonetheless, war is hell,” he pointed out.

“The corporate pawns inside the Beltway want war. They know that only war and destruction can maintain the obsolete position of U.S. banks and the dollar in the world economy. Ukraine’s blood is on their hands,” he said.

“The people of the world want peace. We need to demand an end to U.S./NATO intervention in Ukraine, bring home all troops and weapons, abolish the NATO alliance and allow Russia, Ukraine and the people of Donetsk and Lugansk to negotiate a solution. Russia is not our enemy. People in the U.S. need the corporate/Pentagon war machine off our backs,” he concluded.

Source: Press TV

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2022/ ... ons-hands/


*****************************************

Ukraine and the New Al Qaeda
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MARCH 3, 2022
Whitney Webb

Image

The eruption of war between Russia and Ukraine appears to have given the CIA the pretext to launch a long-planned insurgency in the country, one poised to spread far beyond Ukraine’s borders with major implications for Biden’s “War on Domestic Terror”

As the conflict between Ukraine and Russia continues to escalate and dominate the world’s attention, the increasing evidence that the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is and has been working to create and arm an insurgency in the country has received considerably little attention considering its likely consequences. This is particularly true given that former CIA officials and a former Secretary of State are now openly saying that the CIA is following the “models” of past CIA-backed insurgencies in Afghanistan and Syria for its plans in Ukraine. Given that those countries have been ravaged by war as a direct result of those insurgencies, this bodes poorly for Ukraine.

Yet, this insurgency is poised to have consequences that reach far beyond Ukraine. It increasingly appears that the CIA sees the insurgency it is creating as more than an opportunity to take its hybrid war against Russia ever closer to its borders. As this report will show, it appears the CIA is determined to manifest a prophecy propagated by its own ranks over the past two years. This prediction from former and current intelligence officials dates from at least early 2020 and holds that a “transnational white supremacist network” with alleged ties to the Ukraine conflict will be the next global catastrophe to befall the world as the threat of Covid-19 recedes.

Per these “predictions”, this global network of white supremacists – allegedly with a group linked to the conflict in the Donbas region of Ukraine at its core – is to become the new Islamic State-style threat and will undoubtedly be used as the pretext to launch the still-dormant infrastructure set up last year by the US government under President Biden for an Orwellian “War on Domestic Terror.”

Given that this CIA-driven effort to build an insurgency in Ukraine began as far back as 2015 and that the groups it has trained (and continues to train) include those with overt Neo-Nazi connections, it seems that this “coming Ukrainian insurgency,” as it has been recently called, is already here. In that context, we are left with the unnerving possibility that this latest escalation of the Ukraine-Russia conflict has merely served as the opening act for the newest iteration of the seemingly endless “War on Terror.”

Insurgency Rising

Soon after Russia began military operations in Ukraine, Foreign Affairs – the media arm of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) – published an article entitled “The Coming Ukrainian Insurgency.” The piece was authored by Douglas London, a self-described “retired Russian-speaking CIA operations officer who served in Central Asia and managed agency counterinsurgency operations.” He asserted in the article that “Putin will face a long, bloody insurgency that will spread across multiple borders” with the potential to create “widening unrest that could destabilize other countries in Russia’s orbit.”

Other notable statements made by London include his assertion that “the United States will invariably be a major and essential source of backing for a Ukrainian insurgency.” He also states that “As the United States learned in Vietnam and Afghanistan, an insurgency that has reliable supply lines, ample reserves of fighters, and sanctuary over the border can sustain itself indefinitely, sap an occupying army’s will to fight, and exhaust political support for the occupation at home.” London explicitly refers to models for this apparently imminent Ukrainian insurgency as the CIA-backed insurgencies in Afghanistan in the 1980s and the “moderate rebels” in Syria from 2011 to the present.

London isn’t alone in promoting these past CIA-backed insurgencies as a model for “covert” US aid to Ukraine. Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose State Department helped to create the “moderate rebel” insurgency in Syria and oversaw the US and NATO-backed destruction of Libya, appeared on MSNBC on February 28th to say essentially the same. In her interview, Clinton cited the CIA-backed insurgency in Afghanistan as “the model that people [in the US government] are now looking toward” with respect to the situation in Ukraine. She also references the insurgency in Syria in similar fashion in the same interview. It is worth noting that Clinton’s former deputy chief of staff when she was Secretary of State, Jake Sullivan, is now Biden’s National Security Adviser.

The Afghanistan insurgency, initially backed by the US and CIA beginning in the late 1970s under the name Operation Cyclone, subsequently spawned the US empire’s supposedly mortal enemies – the Taliban and Al Qaeda – who would go on to fuel the post-9/11 “War on Terror.” The US’ campaign against the descendants of the insurgency it had once backed resulted in horrific destruction in Afghanistan and a litany of dead and war crimes, as well as the longest (and thus most expensive) war and occupation in American military history. It also resulted in the bombings and destruction of several other countries along with the whittling down of civil liberties domestically. Similarly, in Syria, the US and CIA’s backing of “moderate rebels” was and remains incredibly destructive to the country it supposedly wants to merely “liberate” from the rule of Bashar al-Assad. The US military continues to occupy critical areas of that country.

With these openly touted as “models” for the “coming Ukraine insurgency,” what is to become of Ukraine, then? If the history of CIA-backed insurgencies is any indicator, it heralds significantly more destruction and more suffering for its people than the current Russian military campaign. Ukraine will become a failed state and a killing field. Those in the West cheering on their governments’ support for the Ukrainian side of the conflict would do well to realize this, particularly in the United States, as it will only lead to the escalation of yet another deadly proxy war.

However, in addition to the above, we must also consider the very unsettling reality that this Ukrainian insurgency began to be formed by the CIA at least several months, if not several years, prior to Russia’s currently ongoing military campaign in Ukraine. Yahoo! News reported in January that the CIA has been overseeing a covert training program for Ukrainian intelligence operatives and special ops forces since 2015. Their report explicitly quotes one former CIA official with knowledge of the program as saying that the CIA has been “training an insurgency” and has been conducting this training at an undisclosed US military base. This training of Ukrainian “insurgents” was supported by the Obama, Trump, and now Biden administrations, with the latter two expanding its operations. While the CIA denied to Yahoo! that it was training an insurgency, a New York Times report also published in January stated that the US is considering support for an insurgency in Ukraine if Russia invades.

Given that the CIA, at that time and prior to this year, has been warning of an imminent Russian invasion of Ukraine up until the current escalation of hostilities took place, it is worth asking if the US government and the CIA helped “pull the trigger” by intentionally crossing Russia’s “red lines” with respect to NATO encroachment in Ukraine and post-2014 Ukraine’s acquisition of nuclear weapons when it became clear that the CIA’s repeated predictions about an “imminent” invasion failed to materialize. Russia’s red lines with Ukraine have been stated clearly – and violated repeatedly by the US – for years. Notably, the US’ efforts to provide lethal aid to Ukraine have coincided with the winding down of its lethal support to Syrian “rebels”, suggesting that the US war and intelligence apparatus has long seen Ukraine as the “next” on its list of proxy wars.

However, more recently, the CIA’s warnings of an imminent invasion of Ukraine were scoffed at, not only by many American analysts, but also apparently by both the Russian and Ukrainian governments themselves. It is alleged that this all changed, at least from the Russian perspective, following Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s claim at the Munich Security Conference that his government would seek to make Ukraine a nuclear power in violation of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. Surely, Zelensky and his supporters in Washington DC and Langley, Virginia would have known that such an extreme claim from Zelensky would elicit a response from Russia. One need only consider the reverberations that follow any country announcing its intentions to become a nuclear power on the world stage. Russian leadership has since made the case that they felt compelled to act militarily after Ukraine, which has been regularly attacking separatists along its border with Russia with embedded paramilitary units that have called for the “extermination” of ethnic Russians who live in those regions, announced plans to acquire nukes.

In addition, given Ukraine’s growing ties to NATO and its desire to integrate itself into that alliance, these theoretical nuclear weapons would be NATO-controlled nukes on Russia’s border. Zelensky, the US, and their other allied parties surely knew that this intention, particularly its admission in public, would push an already tense situation to the next level. Of course, this statement from Zelensky followed a US-led airlift of weapons to Ukraine early last month, weeks before the current Russian military campaign. US lethal aid to Ukraine has previously been described as being tantamount to a “declaration of war” on Russia by the US, per members of Russia’s Ministry of Defense as far back as 2017.

It is worth considering that these red lines and the potential to cross them was discussed by Zelensky and representatives of Ukraine’s intelligence services when they met with the head of the CIA, William Burns, in January. The CIA, at that time, was already claiming a Russian invasion of Ukraine was imminent. Given the events described above, could it be possible that the CIA wanted to bring about the insurgency they have been preparing for, potentially since 2015? Would they have done so by pushing their allies in Ukraine’s government to manifest the conditions necessary to begin that insurgency, i.e. prompting them to cross Russia’s “red lines” to elicit the reaction needed to launch a pre-planned insurgency? With the CIA also training Ukraine’s intelligence operatives for nearly seven years, the possibility is certainly one to consider.

If this theory is more than plausible and close to the truth of how we got here, we are left with more questions, mainly – Why would the CIA look to launch this insurgency in Ukraine and why now?

The apparent answer may surprise you.

Manufacturing the Narrative and the Threat

In May 2020, Politico published an article entitled “Experts Knew a Pandemic Was Coming. Here’s What They’re Worried About Next.” The article was written by Garrett Graff, former editor of Politico, a professor at Georgetown’s Journalism and Public Relations program, and director of cyber initiatives at The Aspen Institute – a “non-partisan” think tank funded largely by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Carnegie Corporation and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Graff’s introduction to the piece states the following:

“Every year, the intelligence community releases the Worldwide Threat Assessment—a distillation of worrisome global trends, risks, problem spots and emerging perils. But this year, the public hearing on the assessment, usually held in January or February, was canceled, evidently because intelligence leaders, who usually testify in a rare open hearing together, were worried their comments would aggravate President Donald Trump. And the government has not yet publicly released a 2020 threat report.”

In 2020, the CIA did not release a “worldwide” threat assessment for the first time since it first began annually releasing them decades ago. This article published by Politico was intended by Graff to serve as a “Domestic Threat Assessment” in the absence of the CIA’s Worldwide Threat Assessment and is styled as a “list of the most significant events that might impact the United States” in the short, medium and long terms. Graff created this Threat Assessment document after interviewing “more than a dozen thought leaders,” many of whom were “current and former national security and intelligence officials.” A few months later, the Department of Homeland Security, for the first time since its creation in 2003, would publish its own “Homeland” Threat Assessment in October of that year. As I noted at the time, this signalled a major shift within the US national security/intelligence apparatus away from “foreign terror”, its ostensible focus since 9/11, to “domestic terror.”

Just months after this Homeland Threat Assessment was published, the war on domestic terror would be launched in the wake of the events of January 6th, which itself was apparently foreseen by then-DHS official Elizabeth Neumann. In early 2020, Neumann had presciently stated: “It feels like we are at the doorstep of another 9/11—maybe not something that catastrophic in terms of the visual or the numbers—but that we can see it building, and we don’t quite know how to stop it.”

Indeed, when January 6th took place, no real effort was made by Capitol Police or other law enforcement officials present to stop the so-called “riot”, with plenty of footage from the event instead showing law enforcement waving the supposed “insurrectionists” into the Capitol building. This, however, did not stop top politicians and national security officials from labelling January 6th as the “another 9/11” that Neumann had apparently predicted. Notably, the DHS’ first-ever Homeland Threat Assessment, Neumann’s warning, and the subsequent official narrative regarding the events of January 6th were all heavily focused on the threat of “white supremacist terror attacks” on the US homeland.

Returning to the May 2020 Politico article – Graff notes that many supposed pandemic “experts”, which – per Graff – includes Bill Gates and US intelligence officials James Clapper and Dan Coats, had “projected the spread of a novel virus and the economic impacts it would bring as well as “details about the specific challenges” the US would face during the initial phase of the Covid-19 crisis. Graff then asks “What other catastrophes are coming that we aren’t planning for?” According to the “thought leaders” he consulted for this piece, which included several current and former intelligence officials, the most immediate “near-term threat” likely to disrupt life in the US and beyond following Covid was “the Globalization of White Supremacy.”

In discussing this imminent threat, Graff wrote:

“‘Terrorism’ today conjures images of ISIS fighters and suicide bombers. But if you ask national security officials about the top near-term terrorism threat on their radar, they almost universally point to the rising problem of white nationalist violence and the insidious way that groups that formerly existed locally have been knitting themselves together into a global web of white supremacism. In recent weeks, the State Department—for the first time—formally designated a white supremacist organization, the Russian Imperial Movement, as a terrorist organization, in part because it’s trying to train and seed adherents around the globe, inspiring them to carry out terror attacks…” (emphasis added)

Graff then adds that “There are serious—and explicit—warnings about this coming from U.S. government and foreign officials that eerily echo the warnings that came about for al Qaeda before 9/11.” He then quotes FBI Director Christopher Wray as stating:

“It’s not just the ease and the speed with which these attacks can happen, but the connectivity that the attacks generate. One unstable, disaffected actor hunkered down, alone, in his mom’s basement in one corner of the country, getting further fired up by similar people half a world away. That increases the complexity of domestic terrorism cases we have in a way that is really challenging.”

This quote from Wray was first published in a piece Graff had written a month prior to publishing his Politico piece. The focus of that interview centered around domestic terrorism in the US, with extensive discussion about the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and the Russian Imperial Movement. In that article, published in Wired, the State Department’s coordinator for counterterrorism, Nathan Sales, characterized that movement as “a terrorist group that provides paramilitary-style training to neo-Nazis and white supremacists, and it plays a prominent role in trying to rally like-minded Europeans and Americans into a common front against their perceived enemies.”

This Russian Imperial Movement, or RIM, advocates for the re-establishment of the pre-1917 Russian empire, which would exert influence over all territory inhabited by ethnic Russians. Their ideology is described as white supremacist, monarchist, ultra-nationalist, pro-Russian Orthodox, and anti-Semitic. They are not considered neo-Nazi, but have worked to build ties with other, far-right groups with neo-Nazi connections.

RIM was allegedly responsible for training a bomber whose acts resulted in no deaths in Sweden from 2016-2017. The bomber, Victor Melin, was not an active RIM member but was reportedly trained by them, and he conducted 2 of his 3 bombings with an individual completely unaffiliated with RIM. Melin was, however, a member of the Nordic Resistance Movement at the time.

A few years later, in April 2020, RIM became the first “white supremacist” group to be labeled a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Entity (SDGT) by the US, despite not being tied to an act of terror since 2017 and despite those previous acts resulting in no deaths. The acts of terror cited as justification by then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were those perpetrated by Melin. However, the Nordic Resistance Movement, of which Melin was an active member at the time of the bombings, did not receive the SDGT label, even though it is significantly largely in terms of membership and reach than RIM. The decision to label RIM this way was considered “unprecedented” at the time.

It has since been claimed that the group now numbers in the “several thousand” worldwide, though little publicly available evidence exists to support this statistic and that statistic notably only emerged roughly a month after the US terror designation and originated from a US-based institute. There are also no statistics available on the number of individuals they have allegedly trained via their paramilitary arm, known as the Imperial Legion.

Per the US government, RIM’s reach is global and extends to the US. However, its US ties are based on dubious allegations of a relationship with Atomwaffen Division’s Russian affiliate and a “personal relationship” with the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally organizer Matthew Heimbach. However, this again is based on the allegations (not direct evidence) that Heimbach received funds from RIM. Heimbach’s group, the Traditionalist Workers’ Party, has been inactive since 2018, two years before the US SDGT designation for RIM. It is also alleged that RIM offered to train other “Unite the Right” figures, though RIM and the “white supremacists” who supposedly received this offer deny the reports. Furthermore, there remains no evidence of any US citizen ever participating in paramilitary training with RIM. This contradicts Nathan Sales’ April 2020 claim that RIM plays “a prominent role in trying to rally like-minded Europeans and Americans into a common front against their perceived enemies.” Despite the lack of evidence left-leaning, non-partisan, and right-leaning think tanks have continued to use RIM as proof of a “large, interconnected, transnational network” of violent white supremacists.

It seems odd that a group that is apparently small and very limited in terms of its presence in the US and that is responsible for no deadly terror attacks would earn the honor of becoming the first US-designed, white supremacist Specially Designated Global Terrorist Entity. This is especially true when the acts cited as justification for the SDGT designation were committed by a member of a different, larger group, a group that did not receive this designation at the time or in the years since. However, in the context of current events in Ukraine, the 2020 designation of RIM begins to make more sense, at least from the US national security perspective.

RIM is alleged to support separatists in Ukraine’s Donetsk and Luhansk regions since 2014 and has been described by the US as “anti-Ukrainian.” These regions are at the center of the current conflict and its most recent escalation last month. The US government and pro-Western think tanks list RIM’s “first attack” as its involvement in the conflict in eastern Ukraine. According to Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC), the number of fighters sent by or trained by RIM in Eastern Ukraine is unknown, though one report states RIM sent “groups of five to six fighters” from Russia to Eastern Ukraine in mid-June 2014. RIM’s paramilitary arm, the Imperial Legion, has not been active in Ukraine since January 2016. However, some reports have asserted that “some individuals opted to stay and continue fighting.” Claims have also been made in more recent years that RIM members have fought in the Syrian conflict and in Libya on the side of General Haftar.

Following this “first attack,” Stanford’s CISAC claims that, from 2015 to 2020, they have been “building a transnational network,” though as previously noted – their success in that endeavor is based on reports of dubious authenticity and/or significance, particularly in the United States. However, their alleged role on the side of separatists in the Donbass has been used by US think tanks to argue that RIM advances Moscow’s policy goals, which they say include “seeking to fuel white supremacist extremism in Europe and the United States.”

Some think tanks in the US, like Just Security, have used RIM to argue that Russia’s government plays a major role in “transnational white supremacy” due to “a mutual affection between Western white supremacists and the Russian government.” They claim that because Russia “tolerates” RIM’s presence domestically, “the Kremlin facilitates the growth of right-wing extremism in Europe and the United States that exacerbates threats to the stability of democratic governments.”

However, what Just Security fails to mention is that RIM has vocally opposed and protested against Putin’s government, has been labeled an extremist group by the Russian government and has even had its offices raided by Russian police because of their opposition to Putin’s leadership. Notably, Just Security’s advisors included former CIA deputy director and Event 201 participant, Avril Haines as well as former deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton at the State Department, Jake Sullivan. Haines and Sullivan now serve as Biden’s Director of National Intelligence (i.e. the top intelligence official in the country) and Biden’s National Security adviser, respectively.

The Dawn of “Domestic Terror”

As a result of the current escalation of events in Ukraine, it appears inevitable that the effort to use RIM to paint Russia as a driving force behind “transnational white supremacism” are due to resurface. This effort appears to have as one of its goals the minimization of the role that neo-Nazi groups like the Azov Battalion, the Neo-Nazi paramilitary unit embedded within Ukraine’s National Guard, are actively playing in the current hostilities.

In January of this year, Jacobin published an article about the CIA efforts to seed an insurgency in Ukraine, noting that “everything we know points to the likelihood that [the groups being trained by the CIA] includes Neo-Nazis inspiring far-right terrorists across the world.” It cites a 2020 report from West Point which states that: “A number of prominent individuals among far-right extremist groups in the United States and Europe have actively sought out relationships with representatives of the far-right in Ukraine, specifically the National Corps and its associated militia, the Azov Regiment.” It adds that “US-based individuals have spoken or written about how the training available in Ukraine might assist them and others in their paramilitary-style activities at home.”

Even the FBI, though more publicly concerned about RIM, has been forced to admit that US-based white supremacists have cultivated ties with the group, with the Bureau stating in a 2018 indictment that Azov “is believed to have participated in training and radicalizing United States–based white supremacy organizations.” In contrast, there remains no proof of any concrete ties of a single US citizen to RIM.

With the CIA now backing an insurgency that prominent former CIA officials are claiming will “spread across multiple borders,” the fact that the forces being trained and armed by the agency as part of this “coming insurgency” include Azov battalion is significant. It seems that the CIA is determined to create yet another self-fulfilling prophecy by breeding the very network of “global white supremacy” that intelligence officials have claimed is the “next” big threat after the Covid-19 crisis wanes.

The injection of the group RIM into the narrative should also be of concern. It seems plausible, given the pre-conflict terror designation for the group and its alleged past ties to the Ukraine conflict, that a CIA-trained Ukrainian insurgent, perhaps from a group like Azov or an equivalent, would willingly pose as a member of RIM, allowing RIM to be labeled as the “new Al Qaeda”, with its base of operations conveniently located in Russia and its presence there “tolerated” by Moscow. It certainly would serve the now, rather pervasive narrative equating Putin with Adolf Hitler in the wake of Russia’s decision to launch its military campaign in Ukraine. It would also serve to launch, in earnest, the up-until-now largely dormant War on Domestic Terror, the infrastructure for which was launched by the Biden administration just last year.

While January 6th was used to equate support for former President Donald Trump with neo-Nazism and white supremacism, recent articles that have followed Russia’s recent military campaign against Ukraine deliberately link this “Putin as Hitler” narrative with US Republicans. US conservatives have long been the focus of “domestic terror” fear-mongering over the past several years (They are also, incidentally, the majority of gun owners).

An editorial by Robert Reich published in The Guardian on March 1st claims “the world is frighteningly locked in a battle to the death between democracy and authoritarianism.” Reich goes onto to state that Russia’s incursion into Ukraine “is a new cold war… The biggest difference between the old cold war and the new one is that authoritarian neo-fascism is no longer just an external threat to America and Europe. A version of it is also growing inside western Europe and the US. It has even taken over one of America’s major political parties. The Trump-led Republican party does not openly support Putin, but the Republican party’s animus toward democracy is expressed in ways familiar to Putin and other autocrats.” Other articles making similar claims have appeared in The New York Times and The Intercept, among others, in just the past week.

On March 2, Salon followed Reich’s piece with a similar editorial entitled “How white supremacy fuels the Republican love affair with Vladimir Putin,” which concludes with the assertion that “today’s Republican Party is America’s and the world’s largest white supremacist and white identity organization” and “that “conservatism” and racism are now fully one and the same thing here in America.”

As this muddying of the waters regarding the relationship among Putin, the US Republican Party, and white supremacism escalates, we also have intelligence agencies in Europe and the US increasingly linking opposition to Covid measures, like lockdowns and vaccine mandates, to neo-Nazism, white supremacism and the far-right, frequently with little to no evidence. This recently occurred with the Freedom Convoy in Canada and, more recently, German security agencies and officials asserted just days ago that they can no longer distinguish between “far-right radicals” and those who oppose vaccine mandates and Covid restrictions. However, these efforts to link opposition to Covid measures with “domestic terrorism” and the far-right go back to 2020.

In addition to these trends, it also seems inevitable that the “Russian misinformation” label, used and abused for the past several years so that any dissenting narrative was often labeled “Russian” in origin, is likely to make a comeback in this context and provide the justification for a zealous censorship campaign online and particularly on social media, where this “transnational white supremacist network” is said to be dependent upon for its supposed success.

The coming “global white supremacist” terror threat, if we are to believe our unusually prescient intelligence officials, appears to be the “next thing” to befall the world as the Covid crisis wanes. It also appears that the CIA has crowned itself the midwife and chosen Ukraine as the birthplace of this new “terror threat,” one which will create not only the next proxy war between US empire and its adversaries, but also the pretext to launch the “War on Domestic Terror” in North America and Europe.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/03/ ... -al-qaeda/

**********************************

In These Days of Great Tension, Peace Is a Priority: The Ninth Newsletter (2022)

MARCH 3, 2022

Image
Konstantin Yuon (USSR), People of the Future, 1929.



Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

It is impossible not to be moved by the outrageousness of warfare, the ugliness of aerial bombardment, the gruesome fears of civilians who are trapped between choices that are not their own. If you read this line and assume I am talking about Ukraine, then you are right, but of course, this is not just about Ukraine. In the same week that Russian forces entered Ukraine, the United States launched airstrikes in Somalia, Saudi Arabia bombed Yemen, and Israel struck Syria and Palestinians in Gaza.

War is an open sore on humanity’s soul. It draws precious social wealth into destruction: ‘The impact of war is self-evident’, wrote Karl Marx in the Grundrisse (1857–58), ‘since, economically, it is exactly the same as if the nation were to drop a part of its capital into the ocean’. It disrupts social unity and damages the possibility of international solidarity: ‘workers of the world unite in peacetime’, wrote Rosa Luxemburg in Either Or (1916), ‘but in war slit one another’s throats’.

War is never good for the poor. War is never good for workers. War itself is a crime. War produces crimes. Peace is a priority.



Image
Anton Kandinsky (Ukraine), Grenade, 2012.



The war in Ukraine did not begin with the Russian intervention. There are a series of authors for this war, each one important to understanding what is happening today.

Pluri-nationalism vs. ethnic chauvinism. Ukraine, shaped out of Lithuanian, Polish, and Tsarist empires, is a pluri-national state with large minorities of Russian, Hungarian, Moldavian, and Romanian speakers. When Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, the question of ethnicity was held in check by the fact that all Ukrainians were Soviet citizens and that Soviet citizenship was supra-ethnic. In 1990, when Ukraine departed from the Soviet Union, the question of ethnicity emerged as a barrier to full participation in society for all Ukrainians. The socio-political problem faced by Ukraine was not unique; ethnic nationalism surfaced in almost every country in the post-communist East, from the terrible break-up of Yugoslavia initiated by Croatian independence in 1991 to the military confrontation between Georgia and Russia in 2008. Ethnic cleansing was treated as utterly normal, such as when the West cheered on the forced removal of half a million Serbs from Krajina, Croatia in 1995. In contrast, Czechoslovakia, one of the countries in the communist East, broke up along ethnic lines peacefully in 1993 into the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Regional peace vs. NATO’s imperialism, part I. After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact (1991), the United States sought to absorb all of eastern Europe into the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). This was despite the agreement made in 1990 with the last government of the Soviet Union that, in the words of then US Secretary of State James Baker, NATO would not move ‘one-inch eastwards’. In the new period, eastern European countries and Russia sought integration into the European project through entry into the European Union (for political and economic purposes) and into NATO (for military reasons). During the presidency of Boris Yeltsin (1991–1999), Russia became a NATO partner and joined the G-7 (which, for a time, became the G-8). Even in President Vladimir Putin’s early years, Russia continued to think that it would be welcomed into the European project. In 2004, NATO absorbed seven eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia); at that time, NATO’s secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, said that Russia understood that NATO had ‘no ulterior motives’. However, Moscow eventually called NATO’s persistent march eastward into question, and, in 2007, Putin accused NATO of ‘muscle-flexing’ in eastern Europe. From then on, NATO’s expansion became an increasingly contentious matter. Although Ukraine’s entry into NATO was blocked by France and Germany in 2008, the question of Ukraine being drawn into the NATO project began to define Russian-Ukrainian politics. This last point highlights how the discussion about ‘security guarantees’ for Russia is incomplete; it is not about Russia’s security fears alone – since Russia is a major nuclear power – it is also about Europe’s relationship with Russia. Namely, would Europe be able to form a relationship with Russia that is not predicated upon US diktats to subordinate Russia?

Democracy vs the Coup. In 2014, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych sought a loan from Russia, which Putin said he would provide if Yanukovych would sideline the country’s oligarchy-controlled financial networks. Instead, Yanukovych turned to the European Union (EU), which offered similar advice, but whose concerns were set aside by the United States, a dynamic that was on full display when US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland told US Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, ‘Fuck the EU’. Earlier, Nuland had boasted about the billions of dollars the US spent on ‘democracy promotion’ in Ukraine, which in fact meant the strengthening of pro-Western and anti-Russian forces. Yanukovych was removed and replaced in a parliamentary coup by a string of US-backed leaders (Arseniy Yatsenyuk and Petro Poroshenko). President Poroshenko (2014–2019) drove a Ukrainian nationalist agenda around the slogan armiia, mova, vira (‘military, language, faith’), which became reality with the end to military cooperation with Russia (2014), the enacting of legislation which made Ukrainian ‘the only official state language’ and restricted the use of Russian and other minority languages (2019), and the Ukrainian church breaking ties with the Patriarch Kirill of Moscow (2018). These measures, along with the empowerment of neo-Nazi elements, shattered the country’s pluri-national compact and produced serious armed conflict in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, which is home to a substantial Russian-speaking ethnic minority. Threatened by state policy and neo-Nazi militias, this minority population sought protection from Russia. To mitigate the dangerous ethnic cleansing and end the war in the Donbass region, all parties agreed to a set of de-escalation measures, including ceasefire, known as the Minsk Agreements (2014–15).



Image
Vasiliy Tsagolov (Ukraine), Untitled, 2008.



Regional peace vs. NATO imperialism, part II. Emboldened by the West, the Ukrainian ultra-nationalists grew their power, and the possibility of negotiations to settle the conflict waned. Violations of the Minsk Agreements by all sides undermined the process. For eight years, the people of the Donbass lived in a constant state of war, which, according to the United Nations, produced over 14,000 deaths and over 50,000 casualties between 2014 and 2021. There appeared to be no exit from that situation. What began to take place was essentially ethnic cleansing, with large sections of Russian speakers fleeing across the border to the Rostov region of Russia and Ukrainian speakers moving westwards. There was little international attention paid to this crisis and the rise of the neo-Nazi elements. NATO powers refused to take these issues seriously or provide Moscow with security guarantees; particularly, to guarantee that Ukraine would not be provided with nuclear weapons and would not become a member of NATO. Furthermore, Russia intervened to seize Crimea, where its navy has a warm water port. These moves further destabilised the situation, threatening the security of the region. NATO’s refusal to negotiate over Russia’s security is the spur that led to the intervention.



Image
Otto Dix (Germany), Schädel (‘Skull’), 1924.



Wars make very complicated historical processes appear to be simple. The war in Ukraine is not merely about NATO or about ethnicity; it is about all these things and more. Every war must end at some point and diplomacy must restart. Rather than allow this war to escalate and for positions to harden too quickly, it is important for the guns to go silent and the discussions to recommence. Unless at least the following three issues are put on the table, nothing will advance:

Adherence to the Minsk Agreements.
Security guarantees for Russia and Ukraine, which would require Europe to develop an independent relationship with Russia that is not shaped by US interests.
Reversal of Ukraine’s ultra-nationalist laws and a return to the pluri-national compact.
If substantive negotiations and agreements regarding these essential matters do not materialise over the next few weeks, it is likely that dangerous weapons will face each other across tenuous divides and additional countries will get drawn into a conflict with the potential to spiral out of control.

The Soviet Ukrainian writer Mykola Bazhan wrote the powerful poem Elegy for Circus Attractions (1927) on the tensions of a circus. Could there be any better metaphor for our times?

A lady will shriek out piercingly…
Then panic takes aim and flies
into their heart-breaking howls,
crumpling their naked mouths!
Grind up the spit and tears,
whisk lips into grimaces!
They’re swinging like corpses on threads,
the voices.


Warmly,

Vijay

https://thetricontinental.org/newsletterissue/ukraine/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat Mar 05, 2022 2:16 pm

Humanitarian corridor from Mariupol
colonelcassad
March 5, 10:48

Image

This morning it was announced that, as agreed by the Russian Federation and Ukraine, the first humanitarian corridor for civilians from Maripol, as well as from Volnovakha, will be launched.
The corridor will start working from 12

Start at 11:00 (Kyiv time). They will be transported along the route Mariupol - Nikolskoye - Rozovka - Pologi - Orekhov - Zaporozhye.
The evacuation of the population will take place from three locations by municipal buses:
- SK "Ilyichevets" (pr. Nakhimova, 53)
- Drama Theater (Teatralnaya square, 1)
- Kalmiusskaya district administration - (pr. Metallurgov, 193)
The same route will be possible to pass and personal transport, it is forbidden to deviate from it.

DPR troops have already received an order to cease fire near Mariupol.
It should be noted that Pologi and Orekhov are under the control of the RF Armed Forces.

There are no exact data on Volnovakha yet.

In general, we see the practical application of the Syrian experience in organizing humanitarian corridors for the civilian population. Now in Ukraine.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7476818.html

Member of the Ukrainian delegation
colonelcassad
March 5, 14:29

Image
Image

In Kyiv, right at the Pechersk Court, SBU officers killed Kireev, a member of the Ukrainian delegation at the negotiations in Gomel with Russia. Allegedly "for treason."
That is, they spanked without trial or investigation. Official person. In the center of Kyiv.
Apparently Zelensky himself could be next. Moreover, about "3 assassination attempts on him" they have already thrown in a thesis. And where there are 3 virtual ones, there is a 4th real one.

As for the humanitarian corridor in Mariupol, it will not exist today. The Nazis do not want to let go of the human shield.
All this is already familiar in Syria. Below is a tablet for memory.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7 ... tml#cutid1

All above Google Translator

**************************************************

Image

Ukrainian Extremists Prevent People from Leaving Mariupol City via Humanitarian Corridors, Execute Mayor of Kreminna City
March 4, 2022
Donetsk, Kiev, SANA—Ukrainian extremist battalions are preventing civilians from leaving the Ukrainian city of Mariupol through a humanitarian corridor, and took them as human shields, Deputy Head of the People’s Militia of the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Eduard Basurin said on Thursday, March 3.

Quoted by Sputnik, Basurin added that the city is suffering from lack of water in addition to the deteriorated humanitarian situation due to the practices of the Ukrainian extremists.

He warned that the Ukrainian army personnel will be exposed to strict strikes if they don’t hand over their weapons.

Ukrainian extremists executed Mayor of city of Kreminna, Vlodymyr Struk after abducting him from his home.

Lugansk People’s Republic spokesman Rodion Miroshnik informed in a statement that the Ukrainian Nazis shot Kreminna mayor dead in cold blood, for he was trying to protect the city, which is still unaffected by military destruction, and to save its inhabitants from death and unnecessary disturbances.

Miroshnik called the abduction and execution of the mayor a “war crime” promoted by the Kiev regime.

https://orinocotribune.com/extremist-uk ... inna-city/

Image

Greek in Mariupol Says ‘Fascist Ukrainians Would Kill Me, They Don’t Let Us Leave the City’
March 4, 2022
With Russian forces besieging Mariupol, in which more than 120,000 ethnic Greeks live, SKAI news spoke with a Mr. Kiouranas who lives in the city. He revealed that Ukrainian fascists are killing people for trying to leave the city.


When asked by SKAI news if he planned to leave the city, Kiouranas responded “how can I leave? When you try to leave you run the risk of running into a patrol of the Ukrainian fascists, the Azov Battalion.”

“They would kill me and are responsible for everything,” he added.

Who are the Azov Battalion?

Azov Special Operations Detachment (Ukrainian: Окремий загін спеціального призначення «Азов»), or Azov Battalion, is a right-wing extremist and neo-Nazi unit of the National Guard of Ukraine, based in Mariupol, in the Azov Sea coastal region.

In 2014, the regiment gained notoriety after allegations emerged of torture and war crimes, as well as neo-Nazi sympathies and usage of associated symbols by the regiment itself, as seen in their logo featuring the Wolfsangel, one of the original symbols used by the 2nd SS Panzer Division Das Reich.

Representatives of the Azov Battalion say that the symbol is an abbreviation for the slogan Ідея Нації (Ukrainian for “National Idea”) and deny connection with Nazism.

In 2014, a spokesman for the regiment said around 10–20% of the unit were neo-Nazis.

In 2018, a provision in an appropriations bill passed by the U.S. Congress blocked military aid to Azov on the grounds of its white supremacist ideology; in 2015, a similar ban on aid to the group was overturned by the Congress.

Members of the regiment come from 22 countries and are of various backgrounds.

Image

It's his personal ideology': USA Today finds Nazis among Kiev's volunteer brigade — RT World News
More than half of the regiment’s members speak Russian and come from eastern Ukraine, including cities of Donetsk and Luhansk.

The unit’s first commander was far-right nationalist Andriy Biletsky, who led the neo-Nazi Social-National Assembly and Patriot of Ukraine.

In its early days, Azov was a special police company of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, led by Volodymyr Shpara, the leader of the Vasylkiv, Kyiv, branch of Patriot of Ukraine and Right Sector.

In 2018, the U.S. House of Representatives also passed a provision blocking any training of Azov members by American forces, citing its neo-Nazi connections.

The House had previously passed amendments banning support of Azov between 2014 and 2017, but due to pressure from The Pentagon, the amendments were quietly lifted.

This was protested by the Simon Wiesenthal Center which stated that lifting the ban highlighted the danger of Holocaust distortion in Ukraine.

“Of course not, it’s all made up, there are just a lot of people who are interested in Nordic mythology,” said one fighter when asked by The Guardian in 2014 if there were neo-Nazis in the battalion.

When asked what his own political views were, however, he said “national socialist”. As for the swastika tattoos on at least one man seen at the Azov base, “the swastika has nothing to do with the Nazis, it was an ancient sun symbol,” he claimed.

The battalion has drawn far-right volunteers from abroad, such as Mikael Skillt, a 37-year-old Swede, trained as a sniper in the Swedish army, who described himself as an “ethnic nationalist” and fights on the front line with the battalion.

A Ukrainian Neo-Nazi Group Is Organizing Violence On Facebook

Another speaking to The Guardian, Dmitry, said “I have nothing against Russian nationalists, or a great Russia. But Putin’s not even a Russian. Putin’s a Jew.”

Dmitry claimed not to be a Nazi, but waxed lyrical about Adolf Hitler as a military leader, and believes the Holocaust never happened.

Not everyone in the Azov battalion thinks like Dmitry, but after speaking with dozens of its fighters and embedding on several missions during the past week in and around the strategic port city of Mariupol, the Guardian found many of them to have disturbing political views, and almost all to be intent on “bringing the fight to Kiev” when the war in the east is over.



Featured image: Azov Battalion.

https://orinocotribune.com/greek-in-mar ... -the-city/

*************************************************************

Disarming Ukraine - Day 9 - Europe Increases Its Own Losses

I feel too outraged and frightened about what is now happening in our societies to write about it. I thus continue to quote others at some length.

Patrick Armstrong continues to be the best military intelligence analyst on Russia:

So far the Russian military operation in Ukraine has been a reconnaissance in force preceded by the destruction of the supplies and headquarters of the Ukrainian Armed Forces by standoff weapons. The object being to suss out where the Ukrainian forces are, to surround them, to check existing Russian intelligence against reality and, at the same time, destroy known headquarters, air and naval assets, supplies and ammunition depots. And, perhaps, there was the hope that the speed and success (Russian/LDPR forces dominated an area of Ukraine about the size of the United Kingdom in the first week) would force an early end (aka recognition of reality).
At the moment they are readying for the next phase. The long column that so obsessed the “experts” on CNN is the preparation for the next phase.
...
As far as I can see they’ve created three cauldrons (encirclements). Probably the most important one is the one around Mariupol where the main concentration of Azov, the principal nazi force, is. Another is being established around the main concentration of the Ukrainian Armed Forces facing LDPR. And there appears to be another developing to the east of Kiev. A super cauldron of all three is visible. The nazis will be exterminated; the ordinary Ukrainian soldier will be allowed to go home. The nightmare question is how many ordinary Ukrainians will be free to choose.


Image
Hardline commentator Bill Roggio confirms Armstrong's take:

Putin is NOT crazy and the Russian invasion is NOT failing. The West's delusions about this war - and its failure to understand the enemy - will prevent it from saving Ukraine, writes military analyst BILL ROGGIO

M.K. Bhadrakumar points out that the now beginning larger war is part of a millennium old conflict within the Christian believe:

At the core is the feud among Christians that began with the Great Schism of 1054 when the main church at that time, based in Rome, split into two divisions, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox. They’ve since come to be the two largest denominations of Christianity.
The Euro-Atlantic leaders will shy away from admitting that this ancient feud all along complicated Russia’s inclusion in any common European home — just as the European Union, a Christian club, will never admit Turkey as a member.


The feud within Christianity began intensifying in the recent decade or two with Russia’s resurgence under Putin’s leadership, when Russian Orthodox Church entered a golden era of state patronage.
...
The Ukraine crisis cannot be understood unless we factor in the swirling primeval passions behind the desperate attempt by Euro-Atlantic countries to attack Putin and weaken Russia and, if possible dismember it, like they did to former Yugoslavia, another Slavic country of Eastern Orthodoxy.

It is no accident that two sentinels of Roman Catholicism, France and Poland, and that gladiator of Protestantism, Germany, are at the barricades of the contestation over Ukraine. This is reminiscent of the Crusade to conquer pagan areas in the Middle East and recapture formerly Christian territories.

Bhadrakumar does not mention that the different flavors of Christianity are also exactly what has caused the problems within the Ukraine.

Image

The parts of Poland and Romania that were attached to the Ukraine after World War II are predominantly catholic. These are also the parts where core members of the Ukraine fascist 'ultranationalists' are coming from.

The religious split is also underlying the age old western racism against Slavs that is currently again prominent. You see, Orthodox Slavs aren't 'civilized people'.

Puck, 1903
Image

Whitney Webb writes that the CIA is creating a new al-Qaeda. This time as a white supremacist rightwing militia. A part of these are mercenaries currently getting recruited by western 'security' companies. These militia will use all the 'small' weapons NATO countries are now delivering to the Ukraine to attack Russian troops and their supporters.

This will have serious backlashes in Poland and Romania from where these troops get deployed. In the longer run it will lead to rightwing terror coming back to those countries who are now supporting these forces. It will also help the longterm trend of rightwing parties increasing their share of votes.

Together with the economic devastation that U.S. and European sanctions on Russia are causing in their own economies this will end in regime-changes in several European countries. The U.S. is of course again protecting itself from as much as it can at the cost of others.

Image
Source: Bloomberg

Tony Wood asks:

The question remains, why did all those who for so long foretold this war do so little to stop it, and so much to hasten the disaster Russia has now set in motion?
Indeed. Why didn't the government of Germany guarantee in writing that it would veto any additional NATO membership? It would have solved at least half of the problem. Why didn't any other NATO government do so?

And what are they doing now? Where are their initiatives for peace?

It is over. The Ukraine is gone. Russia has won.

Energy and wheat prices have doubled. With inciting a longer fight Europe only increases its own loses.

Posted by b on March 4, 2022 at 15:47 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/03/d ... .html#more

**************************************************

Thousands of Lives Saved by Putin in Donbass Republics - Azarov

Image
Nikolay Azarov, Former Ukrainian Prime Minister. March. 4, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@AzarovNikolay_

Published 4 March 2022 (14 hours 53 minutes ago)

Russian President Vladimir Putin has saved thousands of lives in the republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, noted Nikolay Azarov, Former Ukrainian Prime Minister.

In response to a request for help from leaders of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics (DPR and LPR), a region facing shelling from Ukraine, Russia launched last February 24 a special military operation aimed at the demilitarization of the territory.

The diplomat disclosed information regarding intelligence data on the preparation of an instigation, followed by a strike destroying the population in Donbass. Along these lines, he expressed his conviction that the attack from Ukraine against Donetsk and Lugansk territory was planned by Kiev together with the U.S.

Nikolay Azarov also remarked that a week before Russia launched its special military operation in Ukraine, forces of the DPR seized a Ukrainian Army map, which explained in detail a large-scale attack on the republics of Donbass.

Furthermore, the former prime minister drew attention to the conviction that NATO was also involved in developing such a plan. He pointed out that 5000 soldiers from the U.S. had been previously deployed in Poland.


They say that there is no Nazism in Ukraine? Wait, there is no Nazism, do you think? Isn't it? Nazism to kill journalists in the street? Isn't it Nazism to discriminate against people based on their political views? And cutting off the water supply to populated areas isn't Nazism?

The Russian President has repeatedly stated that Moscow's special military operation came after leaders from the republics of Donetsk and Lugansk asked Russia for help amid an intensification of Ukrainian Army attacks on their positions and infrastructure.

The President has stated that Russia's moves were intended to protect the Donbass region by demilitarizing Ukraine. He has also said that Russia does not have plans to occupy Ukraine many times. For its part, Russia's Defense Ministry has spotlighted that Russian high-precision strikes are targeting Ukrainian military infrastructure, noting that civilian lives are not being threatened.

Putin stated on Thursday concerning the operation in Ukraine that all the tasks are being successfully implemented. He praised the sacrifice of Russian soldiers who fight loyally, knowing the justice of their cause. Russian troops are trying their best to avoid losing civilian lives in Ukraine; he pointed out.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Tho ... -0019.html

Hmm, didn't the US bomb Iraq's infrastructure back to stone?
Just sayin'...

**************************************************************

200 people remain under rubble after explosion in Mariupol

Published March 5, 2022 (3 hours 21 minutes ago)

Mariúpol is experiencing an insecure climate due to the presence of Ukrainian nationalist battalions that threaten the ceasefire and the agreed humanitarian corridors.

The leader of the Donetsk People's Republic, Denís Pushílin, reported this Saturday after an explosion caused by Ukrainian nationalist extremists from the Azov regiment in a house in Mariúpol, some 200 people are trapped under the rubble.

Pushílin explained that the majority of the civilians trapped are women and children; while he avoided that the humanitarian corridor opened towards the Zaporizhye region and announced by the Mariupol authorities, is "very insecure".

Fundamentally due to the fact that he remarked "it is very problematic for us to be responsible for that corridor, due to the presence and provocations committed by the nationalist battalions present there," the leader told local Russian media.


The incident occurred after the Russian Defense Ministry decreed, in agreement with the Ukrainian authorities, a temporary ceasefire and the opening of humanitarian corridors in Ukraine to allow the departure of the civilian population of Mariupol, as well as the city ​​of Volnovaja, located in the Donbass region.

In this sense, the mayor of Mariúpol, Vadím Bóichenko, reported on his account on the Telegram platform that the process of evacuating civilians through the agreed humanitarian routes will begin this Saturday from 11:00 a.m. (local time).

He detailed in this regard that the process will be undertaken over several days and in stages, the route of the corridor being available for those who have their own vehicles.

Meanwhile, the official representative of the Donetsk People's Militia, Eduard Basurin, denounced that Ukrainian nationalist units are trying to generate a humanitarian crisis by attacking and damaging civilian infrastructure and supply chains, in the midst of their withdrawal process.


By the way, former Ukrainian Prime Minister Nikolai Azarov (2010-2014) said that he doubts that President Volodymyr Zelensky can control extremist factions such as Azov.

"What I am not sure of is that the ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis who have now infiltrated all the military detachments of the Kiev regime will obey Zelensky's orders," said the former premier.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/quedan-b ... -0009.html

Google Translator

***************************************

Russia carries out humanitarian actions in regions of Ukraine

Image
Russian troops carry out humanitarian aid delivery actions for 24 hours. | Photo: RT
Published March 5, 2022 (4 hours 33 minutes ago)

35 humanitarian aid actions are planned, the delivery of 280 tons of food and medicine, and the evacuation of civilians.

The Russian Interdepartmental Coordination Headquarters for humanitarian aid announced this Saturday that it plans to carry out 35 humanitarian actions in the Ukrainian territories of Kiev, Sumy, Kharkov and Kherson; as well as in the self-proclaimed people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk.

Colonel General Mijaíl Mizíntsev, head of said entity, explained that the 280 tons of essential products that will be delivered as humanitarian cargo include water, canned goods, cereals and other foodstuffs.

To which are added medicines to cover the needs of the population in areas under the control of Russian troops, and as part of an operation carried out by convoys from the Russian Emergencies Ministry.

Image

The also head of the Russian National Defense Control Center details that as part of the humanitarian corridors opened, more than 5,800 people, including more than 1,600 children, were evacuated from Ukraine.

This adds up to more than 149,000 evacuees since the beginning of the Russian special military operation deployed in Ukrainian territory by Russian troops, a figure that includes 40,629 minors.

Likewise, they detailed from the defense portfolio that Russian troops delivered another 217 tons of different aid products in that country and held 20 humanitarian operations.

According to sources from Russian security agencies, some 166,700 people arrived in the Eurasian country from the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics from February 18 to date.

Of which around 94,000 are Ukrainian citizens, more than 61,000 Russians and about 11,200 of other nationalities, according to data provided by the spokesman for the Russian security department.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-ej ... -0007.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply