Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Sat Jul 19, 2025 4:00 pm

Who appointed him anyway?
July 19, 11:07

Image

2017
It is my great honor to announce the nomination of Jerome Powell to be the next Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
2025
I was surprised when Jerome Powell was nominated.

P.S. And then someone else is surprised by contradictory statements on other issues.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9963447.html

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
♨️L'Espresso: In the first five months of his presidency, Trump carried out only 26 fewer airstrikes than Biden did in four years, the Italian magazine writes. Despite the peacemaking campaign rhetoric, the current head of the White House's words are at odds with his actions: there are no completed conflicts, but there are those that have begun.

According to Armed Conflict Location and Event Data, 529 strikes were carried out under the current head of the White House, while 555 were carried out under his predecessor

. Donald Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize. He claimed that wars end under him, not start them. At the same time, in the first five months of his presidency, almost as many airstrikes were carried out as under the Biden administration in four years.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*****

Jeffrey Epstein, Donald Trump and Sexual Blackmail Networks
Posted by Internationalist 360° on July 16, 2025
Chris Hedges

Image

Despite a strong desire from the public to get to the bottom of the Epstein case, the cabal associated with Epstein continues its conspiracy to suppress the ugly truth of the ruling class.



This interview is also available on podcast platforms and Rumble.

Perhaps the biggest elephant in the room of American politics is the existence of a pedophilic blackmail network that involves some of the most powerful people in the country and the world. Despite efforts to get to the bottom of the Jeffrey Epstein case, which saw the trafficking and sexual exploitation of thousands of children, justice continues to be evaded and the cabal associated with Epstein — President Donald Trump notwithstanding — continues its conspiracy.

Nick Bryant is a journalist and author who first published Epstein’s infamous “black book” in 2015 as well as Epstein’s flight logs. This information exposed the powerful names associated with Epstein and those who likely participated in his abhorrent pedophilic escapades as well as those who are likely controlled via Epstein’s extensive blackmail apparatus.

Bryant joins host Chris Hedges on this episode of The Chris Hedges Report to discuss his work as well as the history of the Epstein case and what can be expected next. Trump has resorted to calling the entire matter a “hoax” and Attorney General Pam Bondi, despite promising to release the Epstein files, has recently balked at the idea that there is evidence of an Epstein client list.

Bryant and Hedges discuss how there is already myriad evidence of Epstein’s crimes and relationships but efforts by the current administration could cloud the hope for justice.

Transcript

Chris Hedges

Following the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019, federal authorities seized “hundreds—possibly thousands—of sexually suggestive photographs of girls who appear underage, as well as hand-labeled compact discs with titles like ‘Girl pics nude,’ and, with the names redacted, ‘Young [Name] + [Name],’” the New York Times wrote. The pictures and videos were held in the safe at Epstein’s New York mansion, which was the size of a closet. Business Insider quoted an FBI agent who said “hard drives” were also taken from the safe.

The refusal by the Trump administration to release the files and videos amassed during investigations, should put to rest the absurd idea, embraced by Trump supporters and gullible liberals, that Trump will dismantle the Deep State. Trump is part of, and has long been part of, the repugnant cabal of politicians – Democrat and Republican – billionaires and celebrities who look at us, and often underage girls and boys, as commodities to exploit for profit or pleasure.

The list of those who were in Epstein’s orbit is a who’s who of the rich and famous. They include not only Trump, but Bill Clinton, who allegedly took a trip to Thailand with Epstein, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, hedge fund billionaire Glenn Dubin, former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, former Secretary of the Treasury and former president of Harvard University Larry Summers, cognitive psychologist and author Stephen Pinker, Alan Dershowitz, billionaire and Victoria’s Secret CEO Leslie Wexner, the former Barclays banker Jes Staley, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, the magician David Copperfield, actor Kevin Spacey, former CIA director Bill Burns, real estate mogul Mort Zuckerman, former Maine senator George Mitchell and disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, all of whom reveled in Epstein’s perpetual Bacchanalia.

They also include law firms and high-priced attorneys, federal and state prosecutors, private investigators, personal assistants, publicists, servants and drivers. They include the numerous procurers and pimps, including Epstein’s girlfriend and daughter of Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine Maxwell. They include the media and politicians who ruthlessly discredited and silenced the victims, and strong armed anyone, including a handful of intrepid reporters, seeking to expose Epstein’s crimes and circle of accomplices.

There is a lot that remains hidden. But there are some things we know. Epstein installed hidden cameras in his opulent residences and on his private Caribbean island, Little St. James, to capture his high-powered friends engaging in sexual romps and abuse of teenage and underage girls and boys. The recordings were blackmail gold. Were they part of an intelligence operation on behalf of the Israeli Mossad? Or were they used to ensure that Epstein had a steady source of investors who funneled him millions of dollars to avoid being outed? Or were they used for both? He shuttled underage girls between New York and Palm Beach on his private jet the Lolita Express, which was allegedly outfitted with a bed for group sex. His coterie of famous friends, including Clinton and Trump, are recorded as traveling on the jet numerous times.

Joining me to discuss the Epstein case is the journalist Nick Bryant who uploaded Epstein’s Black Book on the internet in 2015, which contained the names and private phone numbers of a host of powerful and wealthy patrons. He also uploaded Epstein’s flight logs from Epstein’s plane, which also contains the names of numerous perpetrators. It is probably fair to say that he has singlehandedly released more information about the Epstein case than any other single individual, including the Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Let’s begin with, which I mentioned in the introduction, what we know they have. It is quite voluminous.

Nick Bryant

Well, as you said, Epstein’s safe was drilled the day after he was arrested. And there was a huge cache of child abuse material that was taken out of his safe. And I think that there were other items. I’ve been told that there was blackmail evidence also in the safe. So I think that in addition to a huge cache of child abuse material, was also blackmail material.

And the FBI, the day after Epstein was arrested, and I believe the dark apparatus that deploys people like Epstein, they made sure that that safe was cleaned out real quickly. And that’s where we get into problems with what the Trump administration is saying and Pam Bondi. On February 26, she proclaimed that the Epstein files were on her desk and that she was going to open it up and there would be full transparency.

And then she served us a nothing sandwich. There were no new revelations. And like you said, I put more incriminating information about Epstein and his network on the Internet in 2015 than she did in 2025. And I saw the black book. She included the black book that I put up on the Internet and everything was redacted. All the names.

We just redacted numbers and then there’s lots of victims in the black book too, well over a hundred. And we redacted their last name and we redacted their numbers. So Pam Bondi said that she was going to go for full transparency and then she served us a nothing sandwich. And what she said is that she had been bamboozled by the FBI’s New York field office.

So she was either inept or lying. And I’m a generous person, so I’m just going to go with inept. And then she said that there was a truckload of evidence on the Epstein case. And she said only matters of national security would be redacted. So now she has to tell us what a bunch of child molesters have to do with national security.

So she keeps digging herself deeper and deeper into the hole. And she acted like that truckload of evidence had never been seen before by anyone. And I’m willing to wager everything that I have that that child abuse material and everything in Epstein’s safe was being looked at that day and the next day. And there were probably some analysts that didn’t even sleep because they wanted to know exactly what was in Epstein’s safe.

So for her to come out and say that they’re looking at it now, it’s unbelievably disingenuous. And her crescendo of mendacity was the memo. And no one signed that memo that came out last week. Trump didn’t sign it. Bondi didn’t sign it. [Kash] Patel didn’t sign it. No one wanted to sign that memo to be held accountable.

There are a couple of things about that memo that I agree with. I believe that there were more than 300 gigabytes of child abuse material taken out of Epstein’s safe. I also believe that there were well over a thousand victims because Jeffrey Epstein trafficked girls for 25 years. And then things that I strongly disagree with are that he did this by himself and that there wasn’t blackmail involved.

And if he did this by himself, why is Ghislaine Maxwell in prison? And was he going to the island with just some friends occasionally? And why are all these girls listed on the flight logs? It is so disingenuous.

And I think that the Trump administration really underestimated the intelligence of Americans and also their knowledge of this case because when they first released those documents, they must have felt that that would satiate people’s curiosity to understand the Epstein case. And it did not. And then there was a huge blowback.

Chris Hedges

But there was nothing in those documents that hadn’t already been released, is that correct?

Nick Bryant

Nothing new, no new revelations whatsoever. As I said, I released more revelations in 2015 than she did in 2025.

Chris Hedges

Do you believe that there is a client list?

Nick Bryant

I believe that there are files. I don’t believe that it was like the Jeffrey Epstein travel agency and he kept a list of his clients on his refrigerator with a magnet. I don’t believe that. But I believe that there’s definitely a tremendous amount of documentation and also video evidence that there are Epstein files and if the government really came clean with the Epstein files and what’s on the 300 gigabytes, think that we would really find out who the perpetrators are, who Epstein’s co-conspirators are. Although we do know a number of them already, we actually would have definitive proof.

Chris Hedges

Let’s talk a little about what we do know and I want you to talk about the affidavit that was about the woman under a pseudonym in California that was leveled against Trump but from what you released from what we know we do have some sense of what these video records may reveal can you talk about and that let’s begin with just the Trump case.

Nick Bryant

When I put the black book up on the Internet, the black book was ultimately perlined by Alfredo Rodriguez, who was Epstein’s house manager. And he tried to sell it to one of the attorneys that was launching civil suits at Epstein. And the attorney called the FBI. And the FBI did a sting and impounded the black book. And then I ultimately came by the black book through one of the attorneys.

And Alfredo Rodriguez had circled a number of names in the black book of people that he thought were in cahoots with Trump.

Chris Hedges

With Trump or you mean with Epstein?

Nick Bryant

With Epstein. And then we also had the lawsuit documentation of Virginia Giuffre. Maxwell sued her for defamation and she counter sued and Virginia named a number of her perpetrators in a lawsuit.

And this is where we can get double corroboration. For example, Alfredo Rodriguez circled Ghislaine Maxwell, who was definitely a perpetrator and a pimp. And Giuffre named her as a perpetrator and a pimp. Alfredo Rodriguez circled Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel, and Virginia Giuffre named him as a perpetrator and a rather nasty character.

Les Wexner’s name is circled by Rodriguez and Virginia Giuffre named him as a perpetrator. Alan Dershowitz’s name is circled and Virginia Giuffre named him as a perpetrator. And Bill Richardson’s name is circled and Giuffre named him as a perpetrator. He’s the former New Mexico governor and he was also the Clinton’s energy czar and Jean-Luc Brunel’s name is circled and he and Epstein put together, started a modeling agency called MC2 and Brunel…

Chris Hedges

Let me just interrupt Nick because it was copied on Trump’s modeling agency.

Nick Bryant

Yes, yes. And that agency, Jean-Luc Brunel was buying girls in Eastern Europe, not renting them, but actually buying them. And he was bringing them into the United States. And according to Virginia Giuffre’s affidavit that she swore in 2015, Epstein and Brunel had some kind of connection with the State Department or some mechanism in the government where they were able to get either visas or passports for these girls who some of them were well, Virginia says they’re as young as 12 and there’s another report that [says] they’re 11 and 12.

But then I know of therapists who have counseled Epstein victims and we can get into that later. And actually a lot of those victims were or a number of those victims were under the age of 10.

Donald Trump’s name is also circled, but I haven’t found any corroboration that he was a pedophilic perpetrator. There was a case launched by Katie Johnson, who’s in California, and she said that she had been abused by Trump and Epstein. And there was an accompanying affidavit by a woman named Tiffany Doe who said that she recruited her.

But it’s very difficult to know what exactly went on there because she, I guess, was threatened and Lisa Bloom represented her. And from what I’ve been told, she was deposited in a hotel. And this is when Trump and Hillary [Clinton] were in the homestretch and she was deposited in a hotel. And then Lisa Bloom picked her up the next morning and said, we’re going to go to a press conference and she wasn’t ready for that. Now that’s what I’ve been told.

Chris Hedges

Now, Nick, she was 13 and Katie Johnson is a pseudonym. In the affidavit, she said that apparently Trump liked to watch Epstein’s orgies while he got a hand job, that he complained about the oral sex given to him by apparently this 13 year old and a 12 year old, is that right?

Nick Bryant

There was a young girl named Maria and I don’t think we ever found out her age, but she would have been around 12 or 13. Here’s the problem with that. I spent three years looking for Katie Johnson. And I ultimately found her. And I’ve sent her some emails. I found her about a year and a half ago and I sent her some emails and she will not respond to me.

And she’s put together a decent life for herself. She’s selling real estate in the Southwest. She’s got a boyfriend. You can see how her life’s unfolded on Facebook. And she goes to Europe with her boyfriend occasionally. So she’s put together a really comfortable life for herself. And she doesn’t want to talk to anybody about it.

Chris Hedges

Didn’t she get, I don’t know to which point this is alleged, but wasn’t she paid off?

Nick Bryant

We don’t know. It was more the threats that, it was the threats and then the press conference that really decided that when she decided that she was going to recant everything that she said.

Unfortunately, because of how she was handled, it’s very difficult to know exactly what went on. And that’s why I looked for her for three years, I really wanted to know her story, but she wouldn’t get back to me. So I don’t know what to make of that, of the affidavit.

Chris Hedges

Alright, but the charge is out there but let’s talk a little bit about what we do know about Dershowitz, for instance, who makes these claims that he only traveled on the Lolita Express with his wife. You know the flight logs are exposing that to be untrue.

But what do we do know about what happened with these powerful men did within this Epstein orbit?

Nick Bryant

Well, Dershowitz has long been a misogynist, for sure. And what happened with Dershowitz is Virginia Giuffre submitted an affidavit and said that she had been molested by him up to approximately six times. And then Dershowitz went on an offensive against her two attorneys, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell. And Cassell had been a former federal judge.

Dershowitz was pounding on his chest saying “I’m gonna get their licenses to practice law. I’m gonna make sure that they never practice law again. I only fly with my wife. She flies everywhere with me!”

Well, then I got the logs and actually Dershowitz is taking lots of flights with girls like “Tatiana” and “Claire” and his wife is noticeably absent from those flight logs. And in the Gawker article I wrote, he was asked, what about this girl? What about that girl? And his steel trap mind became rather rusty because he couldn’t remember those girls. And actually, when we asked him what the third, there was another, a third girl that was, her last name was unknown and he decided to diffuse it with humor.

He said, that could have been my mother. So with Dershowitz, and he’s lobbied for the age of consent to be 14, regardless of someone’s partner, which is pretty horrible. But he believes in that. And I think that there’s somewhere where he’s written that child pornography should be legal or child abuse material should be legal. So Alan Dershowitz doesn’t seem to be an ethical bellwether.

And his long friendship with Jeffrey Epstein demonstrates that they were very, very close. And there was a Vanity Fair article about Epstein in 2001 and Dershowitz is extolling the virtues of Jeffrey Epstein. And he says, and then he gets really quaint at the end. He goes, “if Jeffrey Epstein didn’t have any money, I would still eat hot dogs with him at Coney Island.”

Chris Hedges

Well, let’s talk about Trump because Trump had a 15 year relationship with Epstein. I mean, according to Trump’s biographer, they were very close for a long time.

Nick Bryant

According to Michael Wolff, yes, they were very close. And we don’t really know what caused the chasm. Michael Wolff says it was a real estate deal that went awry. Other people say that it was, Epstein was trying to procure underage girls at Mar-a-Lago. So it’s hard to know what caused that divide. But yes, they were very, very good friends.

Chris Hedges

But Nick, I mean, Wolff claims that they shared women.

Nick Bryant

And Wolff also claims that he saw pictures of topless underage girls on Trump’s lap too. So these are the things that Michael Wolff has said and he’s got a lot of recordings, but he hasn’t made them public. So it’s going to be interesting. When I had the black book in 2012, no one wanted to touch it. No one. And I went to every publication in New York City and I was talking to editors and publishers and no one wanted to touch it.

And then when we published it in 2015, I mean the floodgates opened and there have been tons of ink dumped on stories about the black book since then. Now, Wolff is saying that he has all these recordings, but no one in the mainstream media is willing to touch it, which you think at this point, someone in the mainstream media would go for it.

So that’s a little perplexing to me, but I also know that I’ve been writing about this realm for 22 years and the mainstream media gets very, very tenuous when these types of subjects are brought up.

Chris Hedges

Well, let me tell you why. Because the people who run these organizations circulate among these groups. These are their friends. That’s how stories got killed at the New York Times. The real estate developers who were all socializing with [A.G.] Sulzberger, when he was the publisher when I was there, complained about Sydney Schanberg’s writing about evicting people and destroying rent stabilized [apartments] and Sydney got fired.

I mean, so we have to be clear that the reason the media has been so reticent about reporting on any of this is because this is their social circle.

Nick Bryant

And according to a number of things that I’ve read, six corporations own 90% of the media in our country. How hard would it be to, I mean, because I’ve been at this for a long time, it’s very easy to compromise people. There’s three things that make people really stupid: one is greed, one is arrogance, and one is sex.

And a number of our politicians and a number of our captains of industry have those three in spades. So how hard would it be to compromise someone at the top of one of these mega corporations? And then there’s also the Sherman Antitrust Act.

These titanic media conglomerates could be broken up within a week if we really wanted to use the Sherman Antitrust Act because they are what the Sherman Antitrust Act was actually conceived for and the government refuses to break up these titanic conglomerates.

So I have a tendency to think that there might be some kind of symbiosis there where the government and the media agree on certain things and not to cover certain things. I’m sure that you saw that at the New York Times, especially with the war in Iraq.

Chris Hedges

Yeah. Let’s talk about what we know. Describe for me the world around Epstein and how it worked and what to the extent we know Epstein did, we know we had cameras all over the place. I think there was a report of somebody walking into a room in his New York mansion was just filled with video monitors from every room in the mansion but describe to us how that world worked and what these powerful figures, Clinton and others, did within it.

Nick Bryant

Well, we got to go back to the Palm Beach Police Department. There was a 14 year old girl that told her stepmother that she’d been molested by Jeffrey Epstein. And the 14 year old girl took her to the Palm Beach Police Department and she told the Palm Beach Police Department.

And the Palm Beach Police Department really didn’t know much about Epstein. They just thought that he was a multimillionaire philanthropic type. They didn’t have a beat on him at all. And the girl described the interior of his home and also described his anatomy. And that was enough for them to start launching an investigation.

And there was a girl named Haley Robson who had recruited this girl. And then she was plundering various high schools for other underage girls. And she had been used by Epstein when she was a minor too and Epstein would give her $200 or $300 for every victim that she recruited.

The Palm Beach Police Department ultimately found 23 victims of Jeffrey Epstein, and they had the statements of five, but then they had corroborating statements of 17 people. So they were going to arrest Jeffrey Epstein on five counts of unlawful sexual activity with a minor and one count of lewd and lascivious molestation, which could have put Jeffrey Epstein in prison for the rest of his life on just those counts, but then they knew of 17 other underage victims and that case got taken away from them and it was given to a grand jury in Florida.

And I don’t know if your audience is familiar with how grand juries work, but a special prosecutor is chosen to oversee a grand jury and it’s not adversarial. Grand jurors are just citizens that have shown up for jury duty and they’ve been filed into a grand jury. And the special prosecutor shows them the evidence that he deems or she deems is important and calls the witnesses that he or she deems is important.

And there was a New York Supreme Court judge who said that special prosecutors have so much power over grand jurors that they could get them to indict a ham sandwich. So what happened with that Epstein case was there were only two victims that were called. One had been 14 when she was molested by Epstein and now she was 16. And one had been 16 when she was molested by Epstein multiple times and now she was 18.

And they were skewered by this special prosecutor, just skewered. And that grand jury didn’t indict Jeffrey Epstein on a single count of child abuse. And what’s very strange is it indicted him on one count of adult pandering. The only two victims that testified had been minors.

And I’ve got the transcripts of, actually, that grand jury and people can go to my website, EpsteinJustice.com or the website that I’m the director of a 501(c)(3) called Epstein Justice. I show just how ridiculous that grand jury… the grand jurors and the special prosecutor are calling these girls prostitutes. I mean, the poor girl was molested when she was 14 and it really scarred her.

And that’s what people don’t understand is if you get molested when you’re 14, it can scar you for the rest of your life. I mean, it can really be damaging, just once it can be damaging. So Michael Ryder, who was the chief of the Palm Beach Police Department, he is the real hero in this story. He would not back down. I mean, and he took lots of threats and there was a lot of pressure put on him, but he’s a good guy and he’s an honest guy and he’s an ethical guy. He wouldn’t back down.

And then he went to the Department of Justice and said, he called that grand jury the greatest miscarriage of justice in modern times. And he went to the Department of Justice and Alexander Acosta was the U.S. Attorney for the District of Southern Florida at that time. And Alexander Acosta and the Department of Justice acted like they were going to impanel a grand jury, but then there was radio silence.

And what they were doing was working out a deal with Epstein and his dream team of lawyers, which included Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, that was so perfidious that it’s kind of mind boggling. And I’ll get into it. So they worked out a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and then they sealed it.

Now there’s a law called the Victim Crime Right Act and according to that law, victims of crimes get to follow the adjudication of their perpetrator and actually get to confront their perpetrator, but the Department of Justice bypassed all of that and sealed that agreement. And then it was appealed and the judge in Florida, Judge [Kenneth] Marra, ultimately wanted to unseal it, but then the feds appealed his decision.

And it was decided in the 11th Circuit. And the 11th Circuit said, this should be unsealed. These documents should be unsealed. And it’s a treasure trove. I’ve got emails between Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña and Jay Lefkowitz, who’s one of Epstein’s attorneys. And the deal that they put together was so dirty, A. Marie Villafaña, in an email, says to Jay Lefkowitz, there’s one magistrate that will sign off on this and we have to go before him.

So they eventually got their magistrate. But what happened with that deal is not only were the victims given, they weren’t given any kind of say into what happened to Jeffrey Epstein, but that document gave blanket immunity to all of Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators. Blanket immunity, everyone.

Chris Hedges

But they didn’t name them, did they?

Nick Bryant

They named a number of them. Yeah.

Chris Hedges

There were four that were named and then others who are unnamed, is that correct?

Nick Bryant

Yes, there were four that were named. But it’s very definitive. It gave blanket immunity to everybody, anybody that was associated with Jeffrey Epstein.

So after that, Epstein was required, the feds made a deal with the state and Epstein was supposed to get 18 months and then he served 13. And he would go out during the day and he would actually molest underage girls while he was ostensibly…

Chris Hedges

He only had to be in the cell at night?

Nick Bryant

At night, yes. So he would molest underage girls when he was ostensibly incarcerated. And that deal is so dirty. And then Alexander Acosta was getting vetted by the Trump administration. He was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District. He was getting vetted by the Trump administration as Labor Secretary. And he was asked, why did you go so light on Epstein? And he said, I was told that Jeffrey Epstein was intelligence and I had to stand down. It was above my pay grade.

And now, there’s only, and I looked into this and I’ve talked to various legal scholars, there’s only two people in the government that can tell a US attorney to stand down. One is the attorney general and one is the president. And this was in 2007. So the attorney general was Alberto R. Gonzales and the president was George Bush II.

And I can’t imagine that an attorney general is going to tell a US attorney to cover up a nationwide pedophile network without getting the okay from his boss, the president. He’s not gonna go out on a limb like that. So the Epstein case was covered up at the very apex of the Bush II administration. And then the Obama administration continued the coverup and the Biden administration and also the Trump administration.

Chris Hedges

Let’s talk a little bit about how it worked. He had his private island. He had a huge opulent mansion in New York. He had a large ranch, I think it was in New Mexico. He had his Florida residence. He would host these opulent dinners. And by the way, none of us really understand why he got all the money he did. He got quite a bit of money from Wexner from Victoria’s Secret.

There’s been, of course, allegations that he had a homosexual relationship with Wexner, I don’t know. But he himself didn’t seem to do much. I don’t think he ever finished college, right? He was a college dropout or something but he amassed millions upon millions from this wealthy clientele. But just talk a little bit how it worked with the island, with the people visiting him, just the logistics of it.

Nick Bryant

When I wrote a book called The Franklin Scandal, and the Epstein Scandal is very much a carbon copy of the Franklin Scandal in many ways. It was about a nationwide pedophile network that was covered up. And there isn’t any books about stuff like this. Well, now there is, there’s The Franklin Scandal. But I was trying to wrap my head around this whole thing, I mean, a nationwide network trafficking all these children, blackmail, intelligence.

It has all the stuff that Epstein has. And I eventually got a blackmail photographer to talk. And he was very honest with me at certain points. And then he became rather unctuous later. But I believe that he was telling me the truth early on for the most part. But he told me, I said, how does this work?

And he said, well, once you’re compromised, it’s like you’re on a yacht. It’s a beautiful yacht and it’s a beautiful day and you can have anything you want on that yacht. But if you decide to get off that yacht, the people on the yacht are going to make sure that you drown. And there’s zero incentive. Once someone is compromised, there’s zero incentive for them to get off the yacht. And actually being compromised is going to help their career.

Dennis Hastert is a perfect example. He had been a pederast going back 30 or 40 years. And his assent in the House of Representatives was meteoric. And he was the Speaker of the House for seven years, even though he had this very dark background.

According to Sibel Edmonds, she’s an FBI whistleblower, the FBI was aware of Dennis Hastert’s shadow life when he was Speaker of the House. So that was obviously a situation where they were told to stand down, like Alexander Acosta was told to stand down because he was compromised.

Chris Hedges

Well if you’re compromised, you’re controlled. This is what [J. Edgar] Hoover at the FBI did. He had files on everyone and he used those files to maintain his own power.

Nick Bryant

And I think that there’s a dark malignant corner of our intelligence. I hate to call it the CIA, but it might be some dark malignant corner of the CIA that compromises people. And, kompromat is not something that’s new. And our media refuses to talk about it, which I find kind of mind boggling because it’s so obvious. There was a Tennessee representative, US representative, named Tim Burchett came out about a year and a half ago and said, my colleagues are being compromised in honey traps.

And actually I had dinner with him about four months ago. And I was just amazed that a sitting congressman, U.S. congressman would come out and say that my colleagues are being compromised. And I was amazed by that type of integrity because I’ve known it for quite some time.

But kompromat is as old as our republic. Alexander Hamilton was having an affair with a 23-year-old. And she was married and her husband was blackmailing Alexander Hamilton. And there was a muckraking journalist that came across this story and outed Alexander Hamilton as having this affair. And [Thomas] Jefferson and Hamilton had a lot of antipathy towards each other.

So this muckraking journalist felt that he would get some kind of position in Jefferson’s administration. And when Jefferson refused, he wrote a story about Jefferson having sex with one of his slaves, Sally Hemings. And DNA has shown that there’s definitely, that there was a relationship between Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson. So when we’re talking about kompromat, it’s been going on forever, but it was certainly at the heart of our republic.

And then there’s one example that I really like to use as far as being compromised. [Former United States Senator] Larry Craig was in Washington, D.C. for 25 years, and he was a very conservative, anti-gay, family values guy. And actually, I think he had the worst record of voting for gay rights in the Senate.

And I wrote a book called Confessions of a D.C. Madam: The Politics of Sex, Lies, and Blackmail, and I wrote it with a guy [Henry Vinson] who ran the largest escort service in Washington, D.C.. And he was sending escorts to Craig all the time. And then there was a documentary called Outrage. It was made by an eminent documentary maker, Kirby Dick. And he looked at closeted politicians and how they vote against gay rights.

And Craig came up in that movie and Kirby interviewed a number of people that had liaisons with Craig and that weren’t involved with Henry Vinson. So Craig was in Washington, D.C. for 25 years as a hardcore conservative, getting escorts from all over. And what happened to him, he was in a bathroom in Minneapolis.

And there’s, I guess, like a signaling system for gay people in bathrooms where one slaps his foot against the ground and then the other one realizes that he’s hot to trot. And so that happened to Craig. He got arrested in an airport in Minneapolis for soliciting a vice squad cop. So here’s a US senator that’s trying to pick people up in bathrooms. How hard would it be to compromise that guy? I mean, a kid, for extra credit, with a smartphone could compromise Larry Craig. And I’m from Minneapolis, and I go back to Minneapolis about once a year. And I was sitting on a commode in a bathroom, and there was a guy in the stall next to me, and he was slapping his foot on the ground. I mean, really hard.

And I thought to myself, he had some kind of neurological disorder. But I’m just glad, I was about to say, can I help you? And I’m just glad that I didn’t say that. So when we talk about blackmail, we’ve got multiple examples of blackmail.

Chris Hedges

So who? If these people are compromised, I know it’s speculation. I mean, Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, very close ties to the Mossad, Robert Maxwell, Ehud Barak, I think he, what is he, recorded 36 times visiting Epstein, to the extent that who’s blackmailing who? How is it working?

Nick Bryant

So over the years, I’ve talked to people about kompromat and blackmailing. And from what I understand, the three countries that are the bellwethers of blackmail are the United States, Israel and the U.K. One would think that Russia would be in that mix.

Chris Hedges

Russia’s pretty high up there. Ask anybody who’s served as a diplomat in Moscow.

Nick Bryant

Absolutely and one would think that Russia would be in that mix too. But the people that I’ve talked to about it have said that those are the top three: US, Israel, and the UK.

So blackmail has been integral to our political system and with The Franklin Scandal, with Confessions of a D.C. Madam, with Epstein, there was a CIA asset who, when I wrote Confessions of a D.C. Madam, there was a CIA asset and we were able to show that it was a CIA asset, who was getting gay escorts from Henry Vinson. And we’re talking mid 80s, he was spending up to $25,000 a month on gay escorts.

And his home was wired for audiovisual blackmail. And he was definitely a CIA asset. With Epstein, people say, was he working for the Mossad? And my reply on that is generally Epstein very well might have been working with the Mossad, but I can’t imagine the CIA letting the Mossad compromise American politicians on American soil without getting a cut of that intelligence.

And when I think of the Mossad and I think of the CIA, I kind of think of the Genovese crime family and the Gambino crime family. They’re always working together. And I think what we have with these intelligence services is very large crime families. Although there are people in these intelligence services that know nothing about the darker side. I should say that.

I have met people in the CIA that, or who have worked for the CIA that I think are pretty decent. And it’s so compartmentalized there that although one of them had gone to a pretty high level, he was not aware of, like MK Ultra, he was not aware of that at all.

Chris Hedges

Let’s talk, Nick, before we close here, about what all this means, why it’s important. It has, of course, created divisions within the MAGA base who feel betrayed. Why is this important? And what’s going to happen next?

You know, there were reports once that Ronald Reagan, from his time in Hollywood, there was a video of him, I don’t know, having a sexual romp, which the Reagan administration managed to quite effectively destroy that may be rumor, I can’t remember where I read it, but let’s talk about what all this means.

Nick Bryant

What this means is that with some dark malignant corner of our intelligence, and we know about the CIA fomenting coups and releasing mosquitoes with dengue fever over Cuba. I mean, the CIA has done a lot of nasty things to a lot of different countries. We’ve imposed like [former President of Chile Augusto] Pinochet, the Shah [of Iran Mohammad Reza Pahlavi], [Former President of the Republic of Indonesia] Suharto, the CIA had their hand in all of that.

And those guys are pretty genocidal, especially Suharto. Americans have come to accept that. And we’ve been lied to a lot. I think we were lied to about the genesis of COVID. I do believe that it came out of that Wuhan lab. And actually, there have been a number of scientists that have said that it did. And the government has more or less conceded that we were lied to about that.

No heads rolled. We were lied to about the financial meltdown. No heads rolled. And we were lied to about the Iraq war. Blatant lies. That actually could have been exposed in real time. But no heads rolled. This is different.

Chris Hedges

Let’s be clear, Nick, those few of us who tried were rather ruthlessly pushed aside, to put it mildly.

Nick Bryant

Yes, it didn’t work out very well for you when you tried to tell the truth about Iraq. But molesting children, that’s something completely different. Molesting American children. That’s something that’s completely different. I think that Americans have learned a lot about malfeasance from the CIA over the years, but this is something that just is very troubling.

And I just think that Americans, they can eat a lot of lies but about child sexual abuse and the government’s involvement, they cannot eat that lie because when you cover up a crime, you’re aiding and abetting that crime. So in the very least, our government is aiding and abetting child trafficking.

And if you look at the numbers of the abuse that happens in the United States, I’m using Centers for Disease Control (CDC) numbers. According to the CDC, 25% of underage girls and 5% of underage boys have been molested. And people in the field think it’s slightly conservative for underage girls and way too conservative for underage boys. But if you just go with the CDC numbers, you’ve got over 50 million Americans that have been molested when they were underage.

And the Department of Health and Human Services commissioned a study and that study found that between 240,000 and 325,000 women and children are trafficked in the United States every year. And this is where it gets kind of mind blowing is if we just go with 240,000, if we go with the lowest number of the Department of Health and Human Services report, there’s a federal human trafficking report that comes out every year. And in 2023, which is the latest one, it found that 664 individuals in the United States had been charged with child trafficking.

And there’s millions of hours of child abuse material that infests the internet. And last year, there were 1,375 individuals that were convicted for making child abuse material and disseminating it. So you’ve got millions of Americans that have been molested, that have been trafficked. And this is something that people can identify with because it’s so ubiquitous in our society.

One in four girls have been molested when they were underage. So this is something that, regardless of what the CIA has done in the past or intelligence has done in the past, this is something that can’t be overlooked. And Trump said that he was going to be transparent about this. And that memo that they released last week is, I mean, completely fabricated, completely fabricated.

And I mean, there are some MAGA people that will drink the Kool-Aid, but there’s a lot of good people that believed in Trump and they cannot abide by that document. They cannot sign off on those lies and that document because that document is saying that all these victims of Jeffrey Epstein, all of them, or most of them, when they say that they were abused by other people, are lying.

And the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund was established to give settlements to women that had been trafficked and molested by Jeffrey Epstein. 225 women have applied and 150 settlements have been awarded and 12 women have declined settlements because if you get, and David Boies is one of the architects of the victim compensation program, I believe he’s a very dirty lawyer, but anyway, he oversaw this and he represented a number of these victims.

But if you get a settlement from that fund or that program, you’ve got to sign an NDA [non-disclosure agreement] and you cannot name any other of your perpetrators. So that’s another example of if these girls didn’t have other perpetrators, why did they have to sign an NDA where they can’t name additional perpetrators?

And this is where it gets really ominous. Well, I mean, the whole thing is ominous, but it even gets more ominous. I’ve been involved in, I’ve been an activist with anti-child trafficking for a number of years, as soon as I realized how endemic it was. And the National Center on Sexual Exploitation has like a global summit every year, and I’ve spoken at three of those. And I spoke at a number of conferences.

And over the years, I’ve gotten to know a lot of therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists that work with victims of sexual abuse. And one of them is an eminent psychologist. Everyone in that field would know her name. And she had a client who described the interior of Epstein’s home and a number of things about Epstein that she possibly couldn’t have known unless she was there.

But she was trafficked by Epstein when she was under 10 years old. And the psychologist tried to get her compensation from that fund and the fund wouldn’t give it to her. And that happened with another therapist that I know who believes that she is counseling or has a client of someone who was trafficked by Epstein when she was under 10 years old.

And that’s another really, really egregious side of the media. The media has decided that the youngest victim is 14, which is really bad, but they’re not going to report on victims under the age of 14. And Virginia Giuffre said that these pedophilic orgies definitely had girls that were 12.

Chris Hedges

And let’s mention that she committed suicide. I think her father claims, but anyway, she committed suicide. I just want to close with Epstein’s death. We don’t have any footage, despite what has been said there.

The cameras were not working in his cell block, so we don’t know what happened. The former New York medical examiner who was hired by his brother and oversaw the autopsy claimed that his injuries were consistent with a homicide. Let’s just close with that. What happened to Epstein himself.

Nick Bryant

Well, I mean, there were a lot of anomalies that night where cameras weren’t working. You know, the Bureau of Prisons took a lot of heat for that. And if they had cogent video of that night in Epstein’s cell, they would have released it at that point. What was released by the Trump administration was a joke. I mean, even if it wasn’t edited, it was still a joke.

Chris Hedges

Well, it wasn’t anywhere near his cell, right?

Nick Bryant

No, no. But here’s the thing about that. I’ve been approached by various news outlets to talk about Jeffrey Epstein’s death, and I generally decline because that’s something that you can go around in circles with. What I want with Jeffrey Epstein is I want justice for the victims and I want the government to come clean.

And I started an organization, a 501(c)(3) called Epstein Justice. Your audience can go to EpsteinJustice.com. And we have webinars every month. And we provide people with the tools that they can use to start putting pressure on their legislators. And there was a, let me see if I can find it here.

There was a motion, House Resolution 3633 that was offered by Representative [Ro] Khanna that would require the Attorney General to preserve and release any records related to Jeffrey Epstein. Representative [Michelle] Fischbach voted no. Representative [Ralph] Norman voted yes. Representative [Erin] Houchin voted no. Representative [Nick] Langworthy voted no. Representative Austin Scott voted no, Representative [Morgan] Griffith voted no, Representative [Brian] Jack voted no, and then the chairperson, Representative [Virginia] Foxx, voted no.

It was defeated, it was a seven to five defeat. We can name these representatives. These representatives are trying to impede our knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein and we’re going to address those representatives. And actually, in our next webinar, which is on July 22nd, we’re going to show how these representatives have impeded. We got to start calling people out individually.

Chris Hedges

What about Ghislaine Maxwell? She’s serving a 20-year sentence. She must know a lot, but she hasn’t spoken.

Nick Bryant

Well, she built the machine, or certainly helped build the machine that destroyed a lot of girls. We’re getting mixed messages from what’s happening with Ghislaine Maxwell. I mean, for her to only be sentenced to 20 years is a joke because child trafficking is a heavy sentence in the federal system. It’s 15 years to life.

And Ghislaine Maxwell was guilty of multiple counts of child trafficking, but she was only indicted on one. And she was given 20 years, but she was indicted on two conspiracies. No one else was indicted. I mean, that just shows you how screwy this whole thing is. And she was moved in, if you’re an exemplary inmate and you’re getting pretty close to the end of your sentence, you’re often moved into a dormitory style living, which is very easy, much easier than the bars and the cells.

She was moved into dormitory living very, very quickly. So she’s been treated about as cush as a prisoner can possibly be treated. And she knows a lot. I believe that she was told to keep her mouth shut and eat some time and then she’ll be taken care of or be able to keep all the money. With the Franklin Scandal, you had one of the pimps kept his mouth shut, did about 10 years for crimes that weren’t related to child abuse.

And then he had a no-show job waiting for him in Alexander, Virginia at a BMW dealership. And the other one committed suicide. And I think the other one, his name was Craig Spence, it’s speculated on the internet that he was suicided. I have a tendency to think that Craig Spence was given a deal that he could either kill himself or else the dark malignant corner of intelligence that he worked for and compromised people with would kill him.

I think that he was given that alternative. And because he was a guy that was too used to creature comforts and living the high life. And I think Epstein was too. I think Epstein was, I don’t think he would have gone gently into that good night, which would definitely have been a motive to kill him.

Chris Hedges

And we should be clear that, according to [Michael] Wolff anyway, Trump was considering giving Ghislaine Maxwell a pardon.

Nick Bryant

According to Wolff, I haven’t seen any information other than what’s coming from Michael Wolff about that. What’s interesting about Maxwell’s adjudication is that it’s been brought to the Supreme Court. She’s been denied at every appellate level. And the Department of Justice has put her case on suspension twice.

So we have no idea what’s going on there, whether the Department of Justice is building a bigger case for her against her, although it’s really difficult to build a much more airtight case against her, ironclad case. But the Department of Justice has suspended the vote, or whether or not the Supreme Court is going to listen to the Ghislaine Maxwell case twice.

So that is something, it could be there’s a huge turnover in the judiciary because of the Trump administration or it could be something ominous. We just have to find out. We have to wait and see and then we’ll find out.

Chris Hedges

Great. Thanks, Nick. I want to thank Diego [Ramos], Thomas [Hedges], Sofia [Menemenlis], Max [Jones], as well as Victor [Padilla], who produced the show. You can find me at ChrisHedges.Substack.com.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/07/ ... -networks/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Sun Jul 20, 2025 5:20 pm

On the role of intelligence agencies in the Epstein case
July 19, 19:05

Image

Is he a CIA agent by any chance?

It’s a strange situation. A massive scandal that has engulfed the highest levels of government, the media, academia, celebrities, and the global financial system is being hushed up because admitting the truth would be admitting a failure of colossal proportions that could destroy the entire country.

Where are the investigative journalists? Remember the clowns at ProPublica who got their hands on Warren Buffett’s tax returns and paraded them around like they were the scoop of the century? Why didn’t they go after Epstein’s hedge fund, his finances, his documents? Where is the revelation that won him a Pulitzer Prize?

Is it possible that Epstein was working for intelligence, as an agent or even an operative? Of course. It’s entirely possible.

Obviously, the intelligence community would be interested in someone like that. Epstein had the access, the influence, the dirt, the connections—and he knew how to use them. Add to that his ability to blackmail people who have committed the most heinous crimes, and you have leverage more powerful than aircraft carriers and nuclear warheads.

If Epstein was cooperating with American intelligence, the consequences would be more than horrific. Perhaps that’s why no real information has been released. We’re talking about the federal government, funded by your tax dollars, knowingly enabling a long-running blackmail operation based on the exploitation of children.

If they admit that Epstein was one of them, they’ll be admitting that high-ranking officials knew what he was doing and who he was abusing. They allowed it to happen and used it as a tool of statecraft. Such an admission would light a powder keg of American mistrust of government. And they know it.

There’s also the possibility that Epstein was working for a foreign intelligence service and U.S. intelligence and law enforcement had no idea.

That would mean the entire US intelligence community — the CIA, the FBI, the Justice Department, the NSA — missed the fact that a foreign agency was running a massive blackmail operation on US soil, targeting US officials, abusing children... and doing nothing about it.

That's not just a failure. That's catastrophic incompetence.

https://t.me/rtechnocom/3718 - zinc

That's the Epstein underbelly.
Pedophiles and child trafficking are the high end.
Behind this lies Epstein's role as an informant/agent of one of the intelligence agencies, which collected dirt on visitors to the pedophile island with the aim of subsequently influencing the decisions and actions of the compromised visitors. Either in the interests of the deep state, or in the interests of Israel. It is no coincidence that some Trumpists are now pedaling not so much the topic of pedophiles, but Epstein's connection with the intelligence agencies and Israel (it is no coincidence that former Prime Minister Olmert came into the public arena and began to publicly deny Epstein's connections with Israel). And in this context, it is not surprising that Trump and Co. are effectively blocking the investigation in this direction. The Deep State has not disappeared anywhere.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9964569.html

Google Translator

******

Has the Epstein blackmail racket finally turned on Trump?

Martin Jay

July 19, 2025

Given how naïve Americans are and how venal its press is, anything is possible – even the suicide of Maxwell

If you ever needed convincing that America was a parody democracy which is run by Israel, then look no further that the Epstein case which is rapidly becoming a huge hit on social media. It seems the more mainstream media in the U.S. refuses to investigate it, the more Trump appears to be desperate on camera when asked about it, the more it stinks, the more pundits on social media parade it for what it is: a scandal which could have devastating implications for Trump as he heads toward the midterms.

It’s a scandal which could ruin Trump when the truth gets out. It is inevitable that Trump is part of the cabal of celebrities and heavyweight politicians who revelled in the hedonism which involved very young girls. The photo of Trump surrounded by a group of girls in their early teens must worry him as much as the foolish comments he has made over the years on the record which affirm his proximity to Epstein. Much worse that these snippets of incriminating material is what the FBI must by now have their hands on: tomes of video taken from Epstein’s Caribbean location after it is revealed that all rooms in the mansion had hidden cameras.

Much has been written of late about the tawdry relationship between Netanyahu and Trump. It is often assumed that the former has an unhealthy leverage over the latter and this advantage might well be described as blackmail. Trump is a sexual predator and has made little secret of that. Unlike some pundits who guess that Moscow has video of him in compromising scenarios while he spent time there in the 80s and 90s, with the Epstein files we can be more sure that the old adage of ‘wherever there is paedophilia, there is blackmail’ must ring true. Video and photographic trails are leading most who care to look, to the inevitable. That Mossad ran Ghislaine Maxwell, as it did her father, and that she was the beating heart of the honey trap which netted scores of celebs who couldn’t control their most basic needs, lured to Epstein and Maxwell like flies to excrement. It is hardly a Pulitzer winning stroke of journalism to join up the dots and to demystify why Trump won’t release the real list, which Pam Bondi – someone who was photographed with Trump once – said would happen at the beginning of his term.

Of course, Trump is a great liar. He is hardly in control of what he saying most of the time which is capricious and meant for the moment in his media environment which he needs to control. He said earlier, when he was running for President, that the Epstein files would be released. Now he is telling journalists to stop talking about the subject. And just recently, after realizing how his unique media skills are lowering himself into a boiling cauldron of culpability, he has flip flopped on that and now says that Bondi should release “whatever she feels is credible” which is of course a hint that she can release the list, as long as it doesn’t have his name on it. What we’re watching now is the Trump administration in full panic and a massive cover up under way, preparing for when some material will be released.

The stink is only getting worse. Just recently Ghislaine Maxwell’s offer to spill the beans and reveal all those who visited Epstein’s island was rejected by Republicans. Perhaps we should not be asking what does Mossad have on Trump but what does he have on the swamp commonly known as Washington DC. More Blackmail. If I go down, then so do all of you. Until now, many have presumed that Trump has used the list as a blackmail tool himself to those who are on it. Although this is conjecture, it is entirely feasible as blackmail is something that the U.S. president has a track record of while in business. Are the Republicans worried that if Trump loses both houses in the midterms that impeachment for him will inevitably follow? What this means in practical terms is a lot of graft which has been already banked, will not flow into a huge number of top pockets. Blocking Maxwell’s offer is a business move. A smart one you could argue.

However, it is not the mainstream parties who are pushing for the so-called “list” to be made public. Ironically it is Trump’s hardcore base of supporters called MAGA who have a strong contingent within them who are convinced that Trump and Epstein are part of a bigger international paedophilia crime circle and that a gargantuan cover up is under way to whitewash the entire cohort on both sides of the house. Americans are not buying some of the clumsier elements of the cover up, like the Justice Department announcing over the weekend of the 4th of July that there was, in fact, no Epstein list as such. They are also not swallowing the silencing of Ghislaine Maxwell or now the number of influential figures on social media posting comments about how they should forget it and concentrate on other bigger stories. They also see though how blackmail runs through this story even entrapping those who are not part of the more repugnant side of the Epstein story, like Elon Musk who tweeted that Trump was on the Epstein list when he fell out with the President. Was this also a play as to get grants from Trump for electric cars? The Epstein list and Trump’s culpability is a card which keeps on getting played in a poker game where the stakes get higher and higher. We are at the point now where someone at the table says “all in” and pushes their stack of chips into the centre. How Trump handles media in the coming days will be critical. Given how naïve Americans are and how venal its press is, anything is possible – even the suicide of Maxwell.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... -on-trump/

******

Trump’s Desaparecidos
July 19, 2025

A hacker found more than 40 people not previously acknowledged by the Trump administration on the list of migrants deported to CECOT, according to 404 Media.

Image
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem during a tour of the Terrorist Confinement Center CECOT in Tecoluca, El Salvador, on March 26. (DHS/Flickr/Tia Dufour)

By Julia Conley
Common Dreams

Dozens of people who have never been acknowledged by the Trump administration were listed on flight manifests for three deportation flights from Texas to El Salvador in March.

404 Media reports that a hacker in May targeted the airline that operated the flights, showing more than 40 men and women listed on flight manifests for planes the Trump administration sent on March 15 who aren’t included on a list of migrants deported that day, according to CBS News.

The network reported on just 238 people who had been sent to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) without due process under a $6 million deal Trump made with El Salvador’s far-right President Nayib Bukele.

The hacked list compiled from the flight manifests instead puts the total number of deported people at at least 281.

The March 15 flights landed in El Salvador despite a federal judge blocking them. The flights have been challenged in court by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Democracy Forward and other rights groups.

Michelle Brané of the immigrant rights group Together and Free told 404 Media:

“We have this list of people that the U.S. government has not formally acknowledged in any real way and we pretty much have no idea if they are in CECOT or someplace else, or whether they received due process.”

“I think this further demonstrates the callousness and lack of due process involved and is further evidence that the U.S. government is disappearing people,” said Brané. “For almost all of these people, there’s no records whatsoever. No court records, nothing.”

Image
President Donald Trump with El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele at the White House on April 14, 2025. (White House / Flickr)

It is unclear whether all the people on the flight manifests were actually on the planes, but if “they were indeed on the flights, it is unknown where they currently are,” 404 Media reported on Thursday.

The outlet said the family of one of the men who is listed on the flight manifests — but whose name has never been reported or acknowledged by the Trump administration — has been protesting his disappearance in his home country of Venezuela.

“It is unclear whether all the people on the flight manifests were actually on the planes, but if they were indeed on the flights, it is unknown where they currently are, 404 Media reported.”

Keider Alexander Flores Navas’ mother, Ana Navas, said in a TikTok video in March that she suddenly stopped hearing from him the day the deportation flights took off — and then saw him in a photo of prisoners at CECOT.

“He was not on any list. But this photo is from El Salvador,” Navas told the Venezuelan outlet Diario VEA.

(Video at link.)

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, called the news of the flight manifests “a horror story.”

404 Media‘s story “provides the first public confirmation of the identity of some of the people who were disappeared by the Trump administration on March 15,” said Reichlin-Melnick.

“Many of the people we sent to CECOT entered the U.S. legally at ports of entry after fully identifying themselves to the government,” he added. “But if they did enter illegally, nothing justifies disappearing people to life imprisonment without trial. It’s un-American.”

The news of the flight manifests comes days after a court filing revealed that Salvadoran officials said the U.S. has jurisdiction over the people being held in CECOT, in response to a United Nations Human Rights Office inquiry about the “involuntary disappearances” of four Venezuelans.

The Trump administration, like Bukele, has denied having the power to return CECOT detainees to the United States.

Lee Gelernt, lead counsel in the ACLU’s case regarding the deportation flights, told 404 Media that it is “critical” for the public to know who was on the March 15 flights.

“These individuals were sent to a gulag-type prison without any due process, possibly for the remainder of their lives, yet the government has provided no meaningful information about them, much less the evidence against them,” said Gelernt. “Transparency at a time like this is essential.”

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/07/19/t ... parecidos/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Mon Jul 21, 2025 3:24 pm

THE TRUMP DIAGNOSIS AND THE PEARL HARBOUR PROBLEM — WHO ANTICIPATES THE WORST BEST WINS

Image
By John Helmer, Moscow@bears_with

The Trump diagnosis is that the clinical symptoms of madness are accelerating. Ergo, time is short for the Kremlin to take advantage. Very short.

The Pearl Harbour problem is that the intelligence of the Japanese plan of attack on the US Navy fleet at Pearl Harbour in December 1941 was very obvious after the event – but dismissed in advance because the political pressure to interpret the intelligence and believe otherwise was too great. Ergo, the conviction President Vladimir Putin currently holds that Trump is capable of rational deal-making on terms for ending the Ukraine war if treated with courtesy and respect may be a misinterpretation. Depending on what happens next, a very large one.

The contradiction ought to be obvious between the first and the second in Russian warfighting strategy.

Equally obvious is the solution which Putin has favoured until now – delay.

Starting again with more evidence.

A fresh diagnosis of Trump’s symptoms has been published by a professor of internal medicine at a leading US university. After the usual disclaimers about diagnosing patients without seeing them in person, the doctor writes: “Trump certainly does not have Alzheimer’s Disease. He absolutely has personality traits – and just listening to him and watching his behavior – I lean toward Narcissistic Personality Disorder and likely Antisocial Personality Disorder. At his age, and with some of the behavior I see, there is a far more common issue that may be going on. It is known as microvascular white matter disease – what used to be known in our culture as ‘hardening of the arteries’. This is profoundly common in the West. The white matter contains the billions of conduits going from one neuron to the other in the brain as opposed to the gray matter where the actual neurons reside. As we get older – and some of us are far more prone to this than others – the white matter begins to have large numbers of microscopic strokes. These may take out the conduit for 10-15 neurons, maybe more, but not the neurons themselves. Our brain can rewire around them but eventually things begin to look like Swiss cheese and there is no way to repair things. At that point, symptoms begin to set in. These are usually manifested as ‘filter’ deficiencies — sudden emotional outbursts, inability to decide, long diatribes, stories about things from decades ago, inability to recognize one’s own mistakes and deficiencies, some mild memory issues, increased impulsive and risk-taking behavior, anger and wrath, inappropriate laughing and crying among many others. This disease process also greatly magnifies the underlying personality disorders.”

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan of Trump’s brain is the most reliable test for white matter disease (WMD), but there is no sign that Trump, or US Navy Captain Sean Barbabella, the White House physician, or his fourteen specialist consultants have ordered this to be done – or revealed if it has been countermanded in their annual medical examination for 2025. Also, their report on Trump’s health omits to reveal ultrasound testing; this is the standard diagnostic tool for the chronic venous insufficiency admitted on July 17 by Capt Barbabella three months after he didn’t admit it in the release of Trump’s medical test results.

The White House physician is also concealing earlier scan evidence of Trump’s brain.

It is certain that Trump underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning of his brain following the attempted assassination on July 13, 2024, when he received a bullet injury to his right ear. Subsequent reporting, unpublished until July 1 of this year, reveals that Trump explicitly requested the original CT scan imagery, and when this was initially refused him by hospital doctors, he sent his campaign director to obtain the film and remove it. After the film was removed, it is not known whether the imagery remains in digital form in the hospital record.

CT scans can reveal the brain lesions which are symptomatic of white matter disease (WMD), but for more precise analysis of the soft tissues MRI scanning is the clinical diagnostic standard. Medical sources express surprise that neither CT nor MRI scans have been undertaken for Trump in the follow-up since the assassination injury, neither during the April review nor in this month’s testing. “It’s like an IQ test”, Trump told staff at the hospital after the gunshot wound a year ago. “They tell you that your brain is good so I just want to have that.” There has been no report from the White House doctors on what they have done with this record – if Trump has disclosed it after verifying privately whether it revealed his brain was good – or bad.

For the Russian intelligence assessment of Trump’s warfighting intentions, it is unlikely the necessary evidence has been hacked from the records of Trump’s fourteen specialists or of the Butler Memorial Hospital, Pennsylvania, or of his chief of staff Susan Wiles. Instead, they have monitored the available eyewitness, video and other records of Trump’s condition. These are suggestive; they can’t be conclusive.

Ergo, forecasting, as the intelligence services must do in their reports to the Kremlin, Security Council, and General Staff, includes the worst-case scenarios. In predicting Trump, this means a plan of US military attack on the scale Trump himself has referred to as “bombing the shit out of Moscow”; “obliterating” Iran’s nuclear processing plants at Fordow and Natanz; and “end[ing] a war…at Hiroshima…Nagasaki”.

https://johnhelmer.net/the-trump-diagno ... more-92120

******

This week’s big questions: Can Trump finally quell the Epstein storm — and is it hurting his presidency?
Analysis by Stephen Collinson, CNN

Published 12:00 AM EDT, Mon July 21, 2025

Image
President Donald Trump arrives to speak at an event in the East Room of the White House on July 18, 2025. Alex Brandon/AP
CNN

Even President Donald Trump doesn’t seem to think his angry and chaotic efforts to end the renewed storm over convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein will work.

He warned in a weekend social media post that “nothing will be good enough” to satisfy what he claims are leftists and troublemakers fanning the uproar.

In reality, however, the controversy was heightened by Trump’s defensive outbursts following his aides’ clumsy efforts to quell conspiracies they fueled before the 2024 election over Epstein’s death in prison and a supposed celebrity client list.

But Trump’s Truth Social post raises important questions.

Will the intrigue, which differs from most of his political tangles since it set the president against his own base, be accelerated by new revelations, including curiosity over Trump’s past ties to Epstein, an accused sex trafficker?

Or, after two weeks of internal recriminations, will the MAGA movement unite to protect its patron following a Wall Street Journal report Thursday on Trump and Epstein, which the president used to set up his trademark assault on “fake news”?

Trump did everything he could to ignite new political fires Sunday to distract attention from the Epstein saga. He demanded that the NFL’s Washington Commanders play again as the Redskins and blasted Obama administration officials over intelligence findings that Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help him.

But the Epstein matter has so far created its own momentum and defied his efforts to quiet it. It’s rather curious in this sense, since it seems less pertinent to the lives of millions of Americans than the impact of Trump’s radical policy moves and power grabs, which have repeatedly tested the Constitution and risked harming the economy.

But scandals that boil away and don’t fade are always a dangerous sign for White Houses, even when the president has a Teflon hide as thick as Trump’s.

One reason this controversy has legs is that its foundations are part of the MAGA philosophy — the idea that hidden elites in the intelligence agencies and government are running an American “deep state” that hides the truth about issues like child sex trafficking. Declarations by Trump officials who fomented the conspiracy that there is nothing to it seemed only to validate the concerns of committed conspiracists in the movement.

Image
A message calling on Trump to release all files related to Jeffrey Epstein is projected onto the US Chamber of Commerce building across from the White House on July 18, 2025. Alex Wroblewski/AFP/Getty Images

Democrats echo MAGA conspiracists and demand transparency
The uproar showed no sign of passing at the weekend, frustrating Trump’s efforts to highlight the success of his first six months in power, which he has used to gut parts of the federal government and to send a jolt of social change through American life.

Democrats launched a new push to discomfit Trump, parroting demands by some MAGA activists for total transparency over the Epstein case as they try to finally find some traction against a president who has obliterated opposition in Washington.

“The president blaming Democrats for this disaster … is like that CEO that got caught on camera blaming Coldplay,” Sen Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat, told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union” on Sunday.

“This is his making: He was president when Epstein got indicted for these charges and went to prison. He was president back then. So all of us would believe they know what’s in these documents. They know what’s there. They have been claiming forever that they should be released.”

The administration’s missteps might give Democrats an opening, especially since Trump’s approval ratings are now in the low 40s and there is growing public concern over his signature hardline deportation policies. A new CNN/SSRS poll Sunday showed that 55% of Americans think Trump has gone too far with his deportations.

But despite fierce internal bickering in the MAGA movement, it’s doubtful Epstein is a deal-breaker for most of the president’s supporters. A CBS News poll Sunday showed GOP voters evenly split over the Trump administration’s handling of the matter. A majority of MAGA Republicans said they were satisfied; only 36% of all voters and 11% of Republicans said the issue matters “a lot” when evaluating Trump’s presidency.

But if the public feels this way, why won’t the storm abate?

GOP officeholders are still having a tough time navigating Epstein questions, a sign perhaps that the political impact might be greater than initially expected. Closing ranks around Trump, they are now trying to create a classic GOP vs. Democrats fight that might further confuse and polarize the public.

Tennessee Republican Rep. Tim Burchett recalled that Democrats had blocked GOP attempts to release all information on the case when they held power in the Senate. “Where the heck was she the last four years?” Burchett asked, also on “State of the Union,” in a reference to Klobuchar.

Trump could help himself by cooling his fury on the Epstein saga
Trump’s hopes of dampening the furor may depend partly on matters out of his control. But if he simply stopped talking about it, it might help. His frequent outbursts and claims that nobody cares about Epstein could be just Trump being Trump. But they also offered an opening for critics to suggest he’s got something to hide.

And the weekend brought several media accounts detailing the past relationship between Trump and Epstein — two tabloid fixtures in New York whose association was no secret early in the 21st century.

No law enforcement authorities have ever accused Trump of wrongdoing in relation to Epstein. But more revelations of their past contacts could enliven public interest and frustrate the president’s attempts to change the subject. That does not mean that Trump necessarily did anything wrong, or that anything occurred that could hurt him politically now. It’s still not clear whether this is a controversy that could impose a real cost on a presidency or something that could blow over in a couple of weeks.

Still, a Wall Street Journal report last week about a collection of letters gifted to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003, including a note bearing Trump’s name and an outline of a naked woman, is reverberating.

CNN has not independently confirmed the report, and the president and his lawyers said the letter supposedly sent by Trump was a fake. Trump has filed a $20 billion libel suit against the paper. But the spectacle of a court battle between the president and The Journal’s owner, Rupert Murdoch — a clash between two of the most influential and powerful titans of the conservative movement — is guaranteed to electrify public attention over the Epstein case.

But comments by MAGA influencers such as Steve Bannon suggested that a fight between Trump and a paper seen as a pillar of the old right-wing establishment could heal splits in the movement. And Trump is an expert at weaponizing attacks against him to galvanize supporters. Consider how he turned his four criminal indictments into the most famous political comeback in history.

There are other aspects of the uproar that make an accurate assessment of its long-term impact impossible.

Outsiders can’t know for sure whether the Trump Justice Department and FBI leadership are being truthful about the findings of their review of the Epstein case. In a memo that dismayed much of the MAGA media machine, both agencies said there was no incriminating client list, nor evidence that the accused blackmailed prominent individuals. They stood by findings that Epstein died by suicide in jail in 2019.

Most Washington scandals explode because of a cover-up or political malpractice. There’s no public evidence at this stage of the former. But there’s plenty to support the idea that this is a political disaster the administration brought upon itself.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, for instance, implied earlier this year that she had details of Epstein’s client list on her desk, raising expectations among activist MAGA members of bombshell disclosures.

Bondi has proved herself a valuable Trump lieutenant, notably in showing the kind of ultimate loyalty to the president and his political cause that many modern attorneys general have preferred to avoid in the interests of the fair administration of justice.

But her handling of the Epstein case has been accident-prone and exposed Trump to political risks. If he comes looking for a culprit, her political foundation could quickly erode.

Image
Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks at a news conference at the Drug Enforcement Administration in Arlington, Virginia, on July 15, 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP

As an example of her eagerness to please Trump, Bondi and her team sprang into action quickly last week when the president demanded the release of grand jury testimony from the Epstein prosecution. But even if the judge quickly allows this — which seems unlikely — there’s no guarantee it would satisfy the demands for more transparency from Trump’s base, and much material would remain under seal.

The MAGA meltdown has also presented other members of the administration with tricky political considerations. Vice President JD Vance spent years calling for more transparency on the Epstein files before becoming Trump’s running mate. But he was quick to blast the Wall Street Journal report with a profanity on X last week. For now, Vance’s political fate rests in Trump’s hands. But no Republican who wants to run for president in future can risk being seen as a member of the Beltway “deep state.”

Trump made multiple attempts to change the subject over the weekend. He repeatedly highlighted another conspiracy theory — given life by his director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard — that the Obama administration committed treasonous acts when the spy agencies warned of a Russian attempt to influence the 2016 election.

Later Sunday, Trump shared an apparent AI-generated video depicting former President Barack Obama being arrested by FBI agents and jailed in an orange jumpsuit, overlaid to a soundtrack of Trump’s campaign anthem “Y.M.C.A.”

And the president warned that he’d thwart a plan for the Commanders to return to the District of Columbia in a new stadium unless they changed their team name. The franchise decided in 2022 after years of pressure from Native American groups to rebrand amid concerns their original name was offensive.

Trump also called for baseball’s Cleveland Guardians to reclaim their identity as the “Cleveland Indians” in a characteristic attempt to stoke culture-war controversy to fire up his base and steal oxygen from other issues.

This might work for him again. But the fact he’s delving into his classic tricks of political distraction is a telling sign he still doesn’t know how to end the Epstein morass.

https://us.cnn.com/2025/07/21/politics/ ... t-analysis

'His Brain Is Squirming Like A Toad...'
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Tue Jul 22, 2025 3:23 pm

How to Make a Super Invisible Plane
July 22, 9:03

Image

Elon Musk continues to bite Trump.
"How do you make a super-invisible plane? Cover it with Epstein's client lists."

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9969217.html

Google Translator

Nothin' more bitter than a lover scorned...))

******

Will The Oligarchs Dump Trump for J. D. Vance?
Roger Boyd
Jul 22, 2025

In his first six months in office, President Trump has very dutifully carried out the agenda of Project 2025 together with extra oligarch bonuses

Slash and dismantle major parts of the administrative state

Reduce state social services provided to the poorer in society

Slash foreign aid and restructure the State Department as a more focused operation of interference in the affairs of other nations

Slash subsidies for the low-carbon energy sector while keeping all the subsidies for fossil fuels

Increase the massive oligarch slush fund known as the “defence” budget

Increase domestic authoritarian control, while massively expanding the other oligarch slush fund known as the Department of Homeland Security

Also normalize new levels of domestic police state subjugation

Also normalize the federal use of state national guards against the citizenry

Make the temporary tax cuts permanent and add even more tax cuts

Discipline the academy even more into being a tool of the oligarchy where any criticism of the oligarchy or its colonial project Israel is severely punished

Discipline the media even more into being a tool of the oligarchy where any criticism of the oligarchy or its colonial project Israel is severely punished

That is quite an amazing set of gains for the first six months in office, greatly aided by an “opposition” that was very obviously told to stand down by the oligarchy that owns them. But now Trump is starting to become a liability as he loses the mass support due to his inability to release the Epstein Files that would reveal so much about how the oligarch political sausage is made. Exactly the same happened with respect to the JFK Files in his first term, but he got away with that. This one was just too big of a promise made to his MAGA faithful and it only adds to the widespread impacts of the social services cuts, ICE overreach and the attack on Iran in turning them against him. Then we have the very obvious cognitive and physical decline since his first presidency where parallels can start to be drawn with the so-obviously collapsing into dementia Biden. Some may consider Trump’s extremely erratic behaviour as some form of “genius” when they are really a sign of cognitive decline in a 79 year old man who does little if any exercise and eats a “heart attack” style diet while having one of the most stressful jobs in the world.

The oligarchs, seeing that Trump has already fulfilled so much for them and is now becoming more of a liability than an asset may now consider plan B: J. D. Vance. A man born from humble beginnings, served in the military, went to Yale Law, married a highly educated ethnically Indian daughter of immigrants (who he does actually share a bed with and doesn’t have to bribe to stay married to him), and wrote a book about his humble beginnings. The near exact opposite of President Trump. So we see the oligarch-controlled media starting to turn on Trump as an individual, carefully focusing on Trump rather than the wider oligarch-serving political class and its oligarch owners. Take out Trump through an increasing media campaign about his decline and about-turns with respect to MAGA, then spring the 25th amendment. It is very obvious that Vance has no liking for Trump and would happily go along with a move that would make him US President.

Then the selling of Vance as the Republican clean “Obama” who rid the world of the nasty Bush/Trump and the quick throwing under the rug of the Epstein files; just like Obama quickly forgot about prosecuting Bush/Cheney etc., for all their crimes as he moved to bail out the oligarchy from the 2008 GFC. The MAGA base will celebrate and be sold on their new squeaky clean president and his none-model intelligent loving wife and their non-sociopathic children. The tariff mess will be rolled back to levels that do not threaten economic and financial implosion and relations with foreign government smoothed over; compared to Trump, Vance will look like a diplomatic genius. And then on to the mid-terms where the Democrats will be told to play their usual game of “incompetence” while sheep-dogging (i.e. putting to sleep) the more left wing elements. All the while, Vance will continue in the “Obama” ways by deepening the implementation of the Project 2025 agenda in a quiet way while operating as a socially calming figure.

As Vance would have served more than two years as president before the next election, he will only be able to serve one full presidential term. This stops him from being the oligarch’s chosen man in office for 10 years but given the decline in President Trump the oligarchy may decide that they just have to act. There will always be a reliable Democrat Clinton/Obama/Biden to help continue the good oligarch work that will be chosen by the oligarch controlled Democratic National Committee (DNC); whether it be Ocasio-Cortez or some other figure. Vance is a much scarier prospect than Trump, as he is very intelligent individual who could extend Project 2025 while appearing to be an extremely rational and “normal” person that is even able to express empathy and love for his family. Able to sleep walk the US citizenry into a much more authoritarian future.

The US oligarchy is slowly waking up to the fact that China is now so much stronger than it ever imagined and that the attempt to knee-cap China’s economic development has absolutely failed and that a war with China over Taiwan would be utterly disastrous for them. That can be seen in the U-turn over selling the most advanced Nvidia chips to China and the alarm at the realization of China’s grip on many of the critical materials that the US military utterly relies upon. In such a situation, antagonizing all other nations through insults and ridiculous levels of tariffs will be self-defeating; especially given the US fiscal and current account positions. If we see a take out of Trump and an installation of Vance, together with a backing off of the tariffs to lower levels and somewhat of a de-escalation with China, it will be a sign that the US oligarchy is starting to wake up to reality. All the while, they would have gained hugely in their plan to enhance their tools of domestic subjugation, disciplining of the poorest and state looting while once again getting their taxes reduced while raising taxes on the majority through tariffs. This will not stop the decline of the US with respect to BRINKCISTAN (Belarus, Russia, Iran, North Korea, China, Iraq and the Stans) together with ASEAN and other areas of the world, but it will slow it a little while embedding the tools that the oligarchs need to remain in power in a declining US.

If we see the negative coverage from Murdoch’s media empire (Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Fox News) and a suddenly woken up oligarch-liberal media (ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN) start to hone in with their Trump attacks together with the MAGA blogosphere then the above scenario may very well be getting played out. With the focus on Trump’s “health issues”, “unpredictability”, “cognitive decline” and possibly “ICE-overreach” etc. It will be all about Trump, not about the actual contents of the Epstein Files nor any other of the widespread crimes committed by the oligarchy and their political operatives. Wrapping up all of the negatives of the past 6 months into Trump as an individual, while Vance has quite conveniently disappeared from the stage recently so that he can come back untainted by the last months of Trump’s rein.

https://rogerboyd.substack.com/p/will-t ... -trump-for

The oligarchy is not monolithic, except when an existential threat like communism is concerned. It is a 'democracy of dollars' and it has factions. They are all our enemies.

******

Public support for Trump’s immigration agenda plummets since inauguration

Results indicate protests against Trump’s immigration policies actually enjoy more popular support than the policies themselves

July 21, 2025 by Peoples Dispatch

Image
Photo: Wyatt Souers

Recent polling indicates that US President Donald Trump’s immigration agenda, involving brutal ICE raids and plans to deport up to 20 million people, have lost ground among people in the US.

A CNN/SSRS poll conducted from July 10 to 13 found that 58% of respondents disapprove of how Trump was handling immigration, up ten percentage points from 48% in early March.

55% of respondents believe that Trump has gone too far in deporting undocumented immigrants earlier in July, as compared to 45% in early February.

A CBS News/YouGov poll conducted July 16 through 18 yielded similar findings. 51% of respondents disapprove of Trump’s program to deport undocumented immigrants living in the US, as compared to 41% in February. 56% of those polled disapprove of Trump’s handling of immigration, as compared to 46% of those who disapproved in March.

56% of respondents believe that the Trump administration is targeting those who are not dangerous criminals, as opposed to 47% of respondents who believed this just last month.

Poll indicates public backs anti-ICE protests
In May, Trump advisor Stephen Miller put pressure on federal immigration enforcement agencies to carry out Trump’s mass deportation agenda, setting a quota of 3,000 immigration arrests per day. In the current administration’s frantic efforts to measure up to Trump’s campaign promise of one million deportations per year, dramatic ICE raids have terrorized immigrant communities and led to mass protests throughout the country. Most recently, the death of farm worker Jaime Alanís following a violent ICE raid on a farm in Camarillo, California, has sparked demonstrations and rallies across the United States.

Results from the CNN/SSRS poll from earlier in July indicate that the protests against Trump’s immigration policies actually enjoy more popularity than the policies themselves. 55% of respondents believe that these protests are mostly if not completely justified, as opposed to 45% who believe that the protests are mostly or completely not justified.

47% of those polled are most concerned that the state would go too far in its crackdown against protesters, as opposed to 38% who are most concerned that protests would get out of control. 59% of respondents oppose Trump deploying National Guard troops in response to protests, with only 41% supporting this measure.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/07/21/ ... uguration/

******

Trump's decline in the face of the MAGA pack
July 21, 2025 , 1:26 pm .

Image
What seemed like a second term strengthened by the unwavering support of his base has turned into a scenario of accelerated erosion, marked by scandals, broken promises and ruptures with key allies (Photo: The New York Times)

Donald Trump, the American president whose political performance has been characterized by spectacle and controversy, faces a new turning point in his declining popularity. Far from consolidating a solid base of support after his return to power, the tycoon finds himself immersed in a seemingly endless political, social, and economic crisis.

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, what seemed like a second term strengthened by the unwavering support of his base has turned into a scenario of accelerated erosion, marked by scandals, broken promises, and rifts with key allies.

The aforementioned is navigating turbulent waters due to battles ranging from unpopular immigration measures to his U-turn on Ukraine policy, to his public diatribe with Elon Musk—and his failure at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—and the growing dissatisfaction with the MAGA movement.

Decline in figures
Donald Trump's popularity has fallen to worrying levels for those around him. According to the latest polls, his net approval rating is at -8.7%, reflecting an electoral base that, while still strong in certain sectors, is losing momentum.

YouGov published a survey of his approval ratings on 52 issues, and these are his top issues—in terms of net approval:

National Security: +4
Border Security: +1
Transgender issues: ± 0

And here are their worst problems:

Presidential pardons: -29
Health care costs: -29
Inflation/prices: -32

Mass deportations, advertised as a measure to "protect American jobs," have been criticized for their inhumanity and lack of real effectiveness. They have been rejected by more than 60% of the population, and only 40% support them, according to a Quinnipiac University (Connecticut) poll released on Wednesday, July 16.

Far from resolving the complex immigration problem, the measures have drawn criticism from all political spectrums and have been cited as one of the main reasons for his deterioration. The president has neglected structural economic reforms, disappointing voters who had hoped for tangible changes.

Image

Investing more effort in border issues than in stabilizing inflation has taken its toll on the US president (Photo: Sky News)
Furthermore, Trump has been embroiled in a series of scandals that have eroded his image. One of the most recent and viral was the fake news about an alleged order to deport his wife Melania and son Barron, which was quickly denied by multiple media outlets. It reflects the climate of mistrust, polarization, and speculation surrounding his administration, as well as the ongoing inconsistency of his immigration rhetoric.

The failed (but calculated) promise regarding Ukraine
Internationally, Trump has been criticized for his inability to manage global conflicts with a strategic vision. His campaign promises regarding the war in Ukraine, for example, were not only unfulfilled but also resulted in a reversal of his initial policy.

Although he promised not to send weapons to Ukraine and to negotiate with Putin, he ultimately yielded to the interests of the military-industrial complex and reversed his stance. The decision was met with criticism, particularly due to the lack of consistency in the Pentagon's accounts of US military arsenal stockpiles. This also undermines his image as a strong and determined leader.

Although the tycoon presented himself as an impartial mediator capable of negotiating with his Russian counterpart, as soon as he took office he found himself embroiled in a constant contradiction: on the one hand, his isolationist rhetoric and criticism of military spending, and on the other, pressure from the powerful groups that control US foreign policy.

Initially, he refused to send weapons to Ukraine, but faced with the escalating conflict, vote-seeking in Congress, and pressure from the military lobby , he eventually gave in. Instead of resolving conflicts, the Trump administration is using the current situation to benefit its military-industrial complex: "The only thing that's making progress is arms sales, the only sector in the United States that has a trade surplus with the world," noted international analyst Alejandro Launagaray.

The influence of such a powerful sector on this decision cannot be ignored. Trump promised to reduce US defense spending and ended up signing multi-billion-dollar contracts with major US defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin, RTX, and Boeing to sell weapons to Europe and West Asia. Apparently, his popularity is declining because he fails to maintain consistency between what he promised and what he actually does.

His expected about-face has generated frustration among his most loyal followers, who yearned for a US withdrawal from external conflicts. The movement, which views Ukraine as a waste of resources, questions his inability to fulfill this promise given that, even when it comes to exports, the United States ends up getting involved in armed conflicts and using part of its arsenal to "support its partners."

Costs of a divorce between magnates
Another of the most scandalous moments was his breakup with Elon Musk, a key ally during his campaign. Musk, who for years championed him on social media and in the economic sphere, has publicly distanced himself from the president, especially after his failure to implement the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an initiative that sought to revolutionize American public administration.

Musk led DOGE with the promise of modernizing and streamlining the government, but his tenure ended in resounding failure. Budget cuts and a lack of a clear strategy created chaos across multiple federal agencies, and the project was abandoned following a series of internal scandals.

The techno-oligarch accused Trump of sabotaging his reforms, while the White House blamed him for "amateur management" while the DOGE, far from reducing spending, ended up with a multi-million-dollar cost overrun. The rift led to a war of statements marked by accusations, economic threats, and even references to the Epstein case. Musk has used his X platform—formerly Twitter—to openly criticize Trump, pointing out that his economic policy is "a disgusting abomination" and that his administration "favors the very corrupt people he promised to fight."

The split has had economic repercussions. The owner of Tesla and SpaceX has lost some $20 billion due to a devaluation of his companies' stock prices five times greater than just before the crisis with Trump. The reasons, in large part, are due to the "economizing" nature of the "One Big Beautiful Bill," which particularly targets cuts in government aid for renewable energy and electric vehicles.

There are also political repercussions. Musk, with his influence in Silicon Valley and digital media, represents an important counterweight to Trump, who has lost access to a base of "techno-libertarians"—young, technologically connected voters.

In response to Trump's suggestion that Musk might be deported to South Africa, Musk responded by "creating" a third political party that would break with the traditional two-party system between Republicans and Democrats.

The separation has generated a negative media campaign against Trump, with memes, comments, and articles that have viralized his image as a leader out of touch with reality.

Epstein as a thorn in the side
The conflict escalated when Musk accused Trump of withholding information about the Jeffrey Epstein files, demanding their full declassification. The president responded by discrediting Musk, but the damage was already done: the MAGA base began to question his transparency.

This movement, for years the backbone of support for Trump, has begun to show signs of fracturing because the Epstein case , with the recent declassification of documents involving figures from the political and economic establishment , has generated a wave of criticism against it for its alleged lack of transparency and commitment to justice.

Faced with the confrontation with its electoral base, which has a strong nationalist bent and defines itself as a defender of truth and justice, the White House has chosen to downplay the issue, which has been interpreted by many as a betrayal of its principles.

Trump and his administration have been accused of perpetrating "selective leaks" to protect allies. He recently blamed supporters who question him for falling for the Democrats' "deceptions" and warned that he no longer needs their support. However, his silence and ambiguous handling of the issue have generated discontent, even among his most fervent supporters. The consequences are now incalculable.

Media outlets and agencies have repeatedly leaked various pieces of information regarding his ties to Epstein, such as the alleged sexually charged letter Trump sent to Epstein on his fiftieth birthday, accompanied by a hand-drawn picture of a naked woman.

Image
As pressure mounts from both parties, a new report further complicates Trump's case over the Epstein case (Photo: File)

The accumulation of controversies—from accusations of conflict of interest to his opaque handling of this case—has undermined his credibility. The erosion of his popularity is reflected in the fact that, for the first time since returning to power, Trump is falling behind Biden in some key regions. This loss of confidence, combined with the growing disillusionment of MAGA supporters, could be a harbinger of a difficult electoral future for whoever the president supports in the upcoming elections.

Trump has lost the aura of "outsider" that set him apart from the establishment , and is now seen as just another politician caught in an explosive mix of scandals, contradictory decisions, a war he couldn't stop, a break with one of his most influential allies, and the erosion of the internal movement that follows him.

This places the United States in an increasingly vulnerable position. Beyond the controversial actions, the changes implemented in the economy, taxes, and social security were decided based on minority interests and threaten to push the population to the limit. Although it continues to have a loyal base, the outlook is not encouraging.

The question many analysts are asking is whether Trump will be able to recover before the upcoming midterm elections, or whether his image, once scorched by his diatribe and unpopular decisions, will become a reminder of how power, without clear direction or coherence, can end up eroding itself.

Meanwhile, the United States is watching closely as this final chapter of the Trump era unfolds, a period marked by spectacle, polarization, and an economic failure that seems unresolved.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/el ... e-los-maga

Google Translator

Being the amateur that he is and perhaps having been read the Classic Illustrated version of 'The Prince' Trump opts for hate as the easiest emotion to manipulate. Winning that second term went to his head and cracked it.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Wed Jul 23, 2025 3:08 pm

TRUMP’S BRAIN – ANATOMY OF SILENCE

Image
By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

In following up the last report, new information has become available on the brain scanning which was conducted on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024, following an attempted assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania.

This is despite a comprehensive and long lasting blackout which began with the US Secret Service and other US government agencies then under President Joseph Biden, and also the Trump election campaign staff.

National media reporters who followed up with several days of investigation in Pennsylvania now say they were focused on the assassin, Thomas Crooks. He was shot dead at the scene and according to reporters in the area, his body was taken to Pittsburgh, reportedly to the Alleghany County Medical Examiner’s Office. The location of Butler – the scene of the shooting, Crooks’ death, and Trump’s hospitalization – is not in Alleghany County. Butler does not have a medical examiner; it has an elected coroner.

Trump’s treatment at the Butler Memorial Hospital included a CT scan, according to several contemporaneous reports. The hospital officials cited by the press at the time were the hospital president, Karen Allen, and the chief of emergency medicine at the hospital, Dr David Rottinghaus. They said that had been prior emergency planning by the US Secret Service with hospital staff going back several years, and a few days before the Trump rally. A local CBS affiliate reporter, Chris Hoffman, talked to Allen and Rottinghaus who told him that “from the time the call came in to when the Secret Service cleared the hospital, it was about three hours.”

Another local source identified “Jenna Enscoe, the hospital’s director of emergency services” as having participated in the months of prior planning and as a volunteer at the Trump rally. After Trump was taken to the hospital, most of the hospital staff were ordered to leave. “Following Secret Service instructions, most of the staff had to wait outside the building during the lockdown. A shift change was taking place a the same time, but the incoming staff was not allowed to enter the building.”

Image
Butler Memorial Hospital, left to right: hospital director, Karen Allen; chief of emergency medicine, Dr David Rottinghaus; director of emergency services, Jenna Enscoe.

After Trump’s treatment, the hospital management and staff were visited by US Government officials. “Staff was debriefed by the Secret Service and U.S. Department of Homeland after Trump left, and the hospital reviewed the events of the day… During the debriefing, federal officers told the hospital what to expect, which included threats. The hospital was told which threats to forward to federal authorities and which to forward to local police.”

During his brief time at the hospital Trump was given a CT scan of the brain. This has been reported by many sources and confirmed by an official letter, issued on July 20, 2024, by the Trump campaign from Dr Ronny Jackson, a former White House physician.

Image

According to Jackson, the medical staff at Butler Memorial Hospital “provided a thorough evaluation for additional injuries that included a CT of his [Trump’s] head. He will have further evaluations, including a comprehensive hearing exam, as needed. He will follow up with his primary care physician, as directed by the doctors that initially evaluated him.”

Trump’s primary care physician at that time has been reported to have been Dr Kevin O’Connor, a retired Army colonel who began serving in the White House Physician’s Office in 2006. He was promoted to become President Joseph Biden’s chief physician at the start of his term in January 2021 and he remained in that post until the end of his term. O’Connor has refused to testify to Congress on Biden’s mental condition, based on the doctor-patient privilege and his rights under the Fifth Amendment.

It is unclear what medical relationship O’Connor may have had with Trump in July 2024; it is certain he will not speak about it.

The doctors who treated Trump at the Butler hospital on July 13, 2024, have remained silent. “The hospital and Trump’s campaign have not released the name of the specific physician who attended to him. Dr. David Rottinghaus, an emergency room physician at Butler Memorial, commented on the hospital’s response but explicitly stated he did not treat Trump himself and would not discuss his condition or treatment. Outcome: No named attending physician is publicly identified.”

A detailed report by Dr Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent and a practising neurosurgeon, said on July 20, 2024: “The concern is that gunshot blasts near the head can cause injuries that aren’t immediately noticeable, such as bleeding in or on the brain, damage to the inner ear or even psychological trauma. As a trauma neurosurgeon, I have seen how a thorough evaluation after any kind of gunshot wound can provide a complete picture and lead to a speedier recovery.”

Gupta added in confirmation at the time: “A source familiar with the matter told CNN on Sunday that Trump underwent a number of ‘routine’ tests at the hospital, including a CT scan that came back normal.” But CNN and all other media were blocked. “CNN has repeatedly reached out to the Trump campaign and Butler Memorial Hospital, where Trump was treated, for more information but has not received further details about his condition or care. CNN reached out to the Trump campaign for comment again Thursday.”

For the hospital, Gupta quoted Rottinghaus “who did not treat Trump himself and would not comment on Trump’s treatment or condition, said he came to the hospital shortly after the shooting to help triage patients. ‘We do prepare for incidents like this. We had had advanced visits in the past for rallies when Mr. Trump was here. The last was the end of 2020. We have worked with the Secret Service in the past and local and federal law enforcement to come up with plans about if an incident like this happened.’”

According to Gupta, the blackout of medical information prevented public understanding of Trump’s medical condition. “While all the attention has been on his ear and right side of his head, that doesn’t mean other injuries may not be present. It’s not even clear that he was struck by a primary projectile from the rifle, a secondary projectile or a combination of both. Sometimes, it can be difficult to know without an in-depth evaluation. We do know that the shooter used an AR-15-style weapon, and in my experience in the operating room, I’ve witnessed the kind of trauma this weapon can cause. The kinetic energy of it is significant: A rifle like the AR-15 can produce up to 1,300 foot-pounds of force. With that much power close to the head, there can be injuries beyond what’s visible.”

“For example, a fracture to the thin bone in that region of the skull, an epidural hematoma (or bleeding between the skull and the brain) and damage to the bones of the inner ear, which can result in hearing loss, vertigo or dizziness. A CT scan can usually detect such injuries, but they aren’t always immediately apparent. As a result, sometimes patients are observed in the hospital and may even undergo a repeat CT scan.” Trump’s time in the hospital was too short for the standard medical observation or for a second CT scan, or an MRI scan which is used to examine damage to the soft tissues of the brain.

Gupta’s prediction of a year ago was corroborated by the Jackson letter’s reference to “further evaluations” and “follow up with his primary care physician, as directed by the doctors that initially evaluated him.” That these evaluations, including CT and MRI scanning, have been undertaken for Trump is likely; that the results have been withheld from public release is certain.

The Butler Memorial Hospital doctors will have viewed the CT scan images and the radiologist’s report. A year later, they are direct sources for answering questions about what the CT scan showed. Now, in retrospect, as Trump’s symptoms on public display suggest white matter disease (WMD), the central question is whether the images of a year ago revealed the bright spot lesions indicating WMD.

Image
Click on source for enlarged view: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Butler Memorial Hospital (BMH) has a total of 2,325 employees, of which about 1,000 are medical treatment professionals. BMH is part of a regional system of hospitals employing more than 1,000 physicians and advanced practice providers and 7,300 employees, According to the hospital, its “ imaging services include computerized tomography (CT), medical resonance imaging (MRI), PET/CT, and digital mammography. Additional imaging services include ultrasound (sonography), nuclear medicine, bone density testing, x-rays and fluoroscopic studies. BMH’s imaging studies are interpreted by on-site board-certified radiologists trained in the following subspecialties: interventional radiology, women’s imaging, musculoskeletal imaging, body imaging, neuroradiology and advanced vein care.”

The listing of the hospital’s medical staff at Butler serving the emergency department includes Rottinghaus, four other doctors, and nine physician assistants. Dr Thomas Raraigh is head of cardiology and imaging services.

Identifying which of them had, still has, direct knowledge of Trump’s CT brain images has been prevented by the hospital management and staff, acting under Secret Service and other federal government orders. After Trump himself says he took the CT scan images from the hospital, they are also in a position to know whether the digital records have been removed or erased, when, and on whose order.

There are three conclusions to be drawn for the time being. The first is that the records of Trump’s tests during his hospitalisation, including the CT scan, were probably removed from the hospital’s computer archive by Secret Service or Department of Homeland Security officials during their “debriefing” session with the hospital staff, after Trump’s departure.

The second conclusion is that Trump himself, acting on private medical advice, probably had a follow-up CT scan a few days after the incident, and possibly an MRI scan as well because the MRI provides better visualization of soft tissue injury, if any. This brain testing and imagery may not have been disclosed to the White House physician after Trump was inaugurated on January 20 or during Trump’s annual medical examination with Captain Sean Barbabella in April.

The third conclusion is that the Butler Memorial Hospital doctors and assistants who treated Trump have kept silent for over a year on what happened, what they saw, heard and believe, because they were ordered to keep silent by their superiors, and by US Government officials at the hospital before the incident; during and immediately after the incident; and ever since.

Can such a sizeable number of hospital doctors and nurses – up to ten – be relied upon to follow orders and say nothing at all about Trump’s brain.Yes is the answer and it can be found in the staff, police, coroner’s court and public hearing records of Salisbury District Hospital, England, which have maintained a blackout on the clinical tests and medical condition of Sergei Skripal, Yulia Skripal, and Dawn Sturgess – in 2018 the alleged targets of the Russian chemical warfare weapon, Novichok. Their silence has lasted seven years to date. Read the book. Image

https://johnhelmer.net/trumps-brain-ana ... more-92138

******

The Bad Hombre Defense?
Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence 23 Jul 2025

Image
U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi said she won't release the full files regarding the investigation. Photo KVUE

What? You mean the client list vanished? Disappeared?
Disappeared from the AG’s desk like dropping egg prices?
Disappeared like old jobs returning to coal mines, mills, and
Factories? Like the reign of peace in the MiddleEast?

Before he hangs himself with
Dental floss; or a garbage bag; or
Falls from a 10th floor window; or
Jumps in front of a train; or skids off the road

Before you suicide another accused
Serial pedophile predator—
Who might flip and name names—
Before he has a heart attack; or viagra overdose

Quick! Call the Cream Team!
Ain’t Slick Willy a lawyer?
Ain’t Dershbag a lawyer? Surely, they both know Bad
Hombre Defense, and its certainty of reasonable doubt?

He’s Rich. He’s White. He’s Christian. He Can
Have any woman he wants! Why would a man
Of his stature; with his power; fool around with
Teen trailer trash? Ask yourself, why? Why?

Besides, he would never—Ever—touch a teenaged
Child! Why, he’d rather be chemically castrated
With Clorox—by the Devil himself—then touch a
Child! He swears on the stack of Bibles he’s hawking.

Maybe Mexican-murderer-rapists— Bad Hombres
From below The Border— stole his
Passport, boarded the financier’s plane, frequented
Mansions and impersonated him with teenage girls?

Maybe Mexican-murderer-rapists— Bad Hombres
From below The Border—filed false flight plans and flew The Lolita
Express to Orgy Island? Slick Willy swears he was asleep … Maybe
Tattoo could testify to it, “De plane, de plane, boss!” if he wasn’t dead?

© 2025. Raymond Nat Turner, The Town Crier. All Rights Reserved.

https://blackagendareport.com/bad-hombre-defense-0
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Thu Jul 24, 2025 8:12 pm

To Dodge Epstein Trump Declares Intra-Elite War

Offers Obama To The MAGA Masses
Roger Boyd
Jul 24, 2025

The US ruling bourgeois oligarchy can have its differences, but when push comes to shove the interests of the oligarchic class as a whole will trump any differences. Members of the oligarchy and bought-and-paid-for political tools may attack each other, but they will never get so vicious as to expose the overall class interests. It is very obvious that the full publication of all of the Epstein evidence would cause serious harm to the oligarchy as a whole as it would expose the widespread levels of disgusting wrong doing that pervade an oligarch class that assumes that it is above the law.







So Trump had to reel back in his promises and keep hidden the really juicy parts, just like he did with the JFK files. But his MAGA base cannot accept this, and the oligarchy also sees it as an issue (the non-release not the details that they certainly do not want to be released) that can be used to help oust Trump for the much more reliable, stable and order-following Vance. Trump may certainly not be a “stable genius” but he is certainly extremely devious and politically aware. Seeing the walls starting to close in he went for the biggest distraction possible, and one that would feed political red meat to MAGA; taking down Obama and his cohorts for the “Russia, Russia, Russia” fabrication. As a side benefit it would also greatly damage whatever legitimacy that the “liberal media” has left. With full control over the Whitehouse and the House and Senate, together with his MAGA legions now behind him once again, Trump calculated that attack was the best form of defence.



The problem for the oligarchy is that the “Russia, Russia, Russia” fabrication involved such large parts of the political class, the security state, and the media that it threatens to show many details of how the American ruling class sausage is made by the oligarchy and their tools. Such dangerous intra-elite conflict is many times a sign of the collapse of the power structure, as class interests become overridden by intra-elite feuds. If anyone is equipped to throw a wrecking ball through the legitimacy of the oligarchy it is Trump. And the perfect weapon is a Tulsi Gabbard that MAGA loves and that truly hates the Democratic Party, most especially its rulers in the Democratic National Convention (DNC). And once you start the ball rolling it may be hard to stop it. The document releases from Tulsi are coming thick and fast. This from the BBC:

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a previously classified report which she says points to a "treasonous conspiracy" to undermine the results of the 2016 presidential election. The House Intelligence Committee document takes issue with the conclusion, reached by numerous intelligence reports including one by the CIA, that Russia sought to help Donald Trump in that election. Gabbard appeared at the White House on Wednesday and said the report reveals "egregious weaponisation and politicisation of intelligence". Democrats said the White House is trying to distract from the ongoing controversy surrounding its decision not to publish files relating to Jeffrey Epstein.

Of course the Democrats are correct, but one wrong does not excuse another. The Obama clique stuck with their disproven blatant lies in response, “Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesman for former President Barack Obama, said in a statement earlier this week that no released information ‘undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes’". Aaron Mate has of course utterly destroyed this very obvious lie that is based upon fabricated evidence and misinformation.







On Wednesday, Gabbard announced that she was referring former President Barack Obama for criminal charges to the Department of Justice (DOJ), while releasing more evidence to back up her claims that “exposes how the Obama Administration manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false, promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.” On Twitter she stated that:

LIE: Putin and the Russian Government helped Trump win the 2016 election

TRUTH: President Obama, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russia Hoax, suppressed intelligence showing Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufactured findings from shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, and knowingly lied to the American people.

LIE: The fabricated Steele Dossier was not used as a source in the Obama Administration’s January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment of the November 2016 election

TRUTH: Not only did CIA Director Brennan, FBI Director Comey, DNI Clapper and others include the Steele Dossier in the 2017 ICA, they overruled senior Intel officials who warned them it was fabricated and should not be used.

LIE: The Obama Administration’s January ICA was an independent Intelligence Community product, produced with apolitical analysis.

TRUTH: Obama ordered the Intelligence Community to create an Intelligence Community Assessment they knew was false, promoting a contrived narrative, with the intent of undermining the legitimacy and power of a duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.

Together, the ODNI records released on Friday, the JusticeDept's June 2018 report known as the “Clinton annex" released earlier this week, and the House Intel oversight report we released today confirm what many Americans have known: The Russia Hoax was a lie that was knowingly created by the Obama Administration to undermine the legitimacy and power of the duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.


With this, Trump is declaring “back off or I will blow the whole thing up!” If the oligarchy responds by pulling back on their attempt to remove him, then this whole thing will be subject to a forever “under investigation” process. Otherwise, Trump will keep escalating. He has to be careful though as he is a quite old not very healthy or fit man, and “accidents” and “natural causes” can happen to such people without raising too much suspicion. Those that risk the class interests of the oligarchy as a whole may be swiftly dealt with.

The Daily Show below is earning its keep as a propagandist liberal elite tool, working hard to say “nothing to see here, please move on!'“ with the revelations about Obama’s complicity. The show has always been one to allow limited complaints about the oligarchy to help let off citizen’s steam while sucking the energy out of any real attempt to change the system. Classic “controlled opposition”, working on the fake Democrat-Republican differences.



If this fails, and Trump does not back down, then go to Plan B. Or will the oligarchy allow Obama to be sacrificed, while limiting the fallout to the rest of the oligarchy and its political tools? Perhaps the Obama clan will be called “bad apples” with the shedding of crocodile tears. Such oligarch tools are just tools, and can be discarded by the oligarchy with ease. The behind-the-scenes machinations will be complex and intense.

https://rogerboyd.substack.com/p/to-dod ... ares-intra

******

CovertAction Bulletin: Is Epstein the Final Straw for Trump’s Base?

By Rachel Hu and Chris Garaffa - July 23, 2025 0

Image
[Source: AP]

CLICK HERE to listen on podcast platforms worldwide https://covertactionbulletin.podbean.co ... mp-s-base/
Support this broadcast: become a patreon!

In 2024, Donald Trump said he’d declassify and release the files the U.S. government has on notorious child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. But recently, responding to disappointment and growing demands from his base to actually release the full files, he told a crowd of reporters in Pennsylvania that “I don’t understand why the Epstein files would be of interest to anybody. It’s pretty boring stuff. It’s sordid, but it’s boring. And I don’t understand why it keeps going.”

Even among the MAGA faithful, few minds have been changed and calls to release information continue to grow.

Investigation into Epstein’s life and sudden death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City often raises more questions than it answers. How did he go from teaching at the elite Dalton School to being a billionaire financier? Even his connections to Bear Stearns and former Limited Brands chairman Leslie Wexner don’t fully explain it, his friendships with royalty and the elite around the world, or the Austrian passport with a fake name and a Saudi Arabian address found in his home.

When he pleaded guilty to soliciting underage prostitutes, Epstein got a 13-month sentence—and was allowed to leave the jail for 12 hours every day so that he could continue working his home office. And in 2007, he entered into an agreement with federal prosecutors in Florida that he would not be prosecuted as part of another investigation. The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Alexander Acosta, later said that he was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to “leave it alone.”

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2025/0 ... umps-base/

******

DOJ Warned Trump Months Ago That His Name Appears Multiple Times in Epstein’s Files

Image
New report reveals Trump was warned about Epstein connections months ago.Photo:EFE

July 23, 2025 Hour: 8:13 pm


New reports reveal the U.S. Department of Justice alerted President Donald Trump that his name appeared multiple times in Jeffrey Epstein’s files, fueling suspicions of elite involvement and exposing systemic efforts to shield powerful figures from accountability.

In a revealing disclosure, it emerged that in May 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) warned President Donald Trump that his name appeared multiple times in the controversial files linked to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

These revelations come amidst ongoing debates about the systemic protection of the global elite from justice and the failure of the U.S. legal establishment to hold powerful figures accountable.

According to high-ranking officials cited by the Wall Street Journal, during a routine White House briefing, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed Trump that, alongside other high-profile individuals, his name appeared in Epstein’s files.

However, the DOJ explicitly warned that many entries consisted of unverified rumors. White House communications director Steven Cheung promptly dismissed the report as “fake news,” repeating Trump’s longstanding denial of any close relationship with Epstein.

Since Epstein’s arrest on charges of sex trafficking minors and subsequent death in a federal prison under suspicious circumstances, questions about the depth of elite complicity have persisted.

The DOJ’s memo insists there is no substantive evidence to pursue investigations or prosecutions beyond Epstein himself, citing no credible proof of blackmail or criminal conspiracies involving other figures.

This posture supports critiques from leftist analysts who argue that the U.S. justice system systematically shields powerful individuals behind the façade of due process while scapegoating marginalized victims.

Images and video footage documenting Trump’s association with Epstein,including recent revelations of the latter’s presence at Trump’s 1993 wedding,highlight the entanglement of capitalist elites in exploitative and criminal networks.


Despite attempts by the Trump administration to quash public scrutiny,such as contesting the authenticity of letters and silencing whistleblowers,the ongoing leaks keep exposing the systemic corruption plaguing the U.S. ruling class.

These disclosures have provoked outrage within the Movement to Make America Great Again (MAGA) faction, which accuses the administration of betrayal for failing to publish the so-called “Epstein list.”

Critics on the far-right have long weaponized conspiracy theories targeting global elites, but the refusal to release further records has caused frustration and infighting, destabilizing reactionary political forces tied to Trump.

Image

https://www.telesurenglish.net/doj-warn ... ins-files/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Sat Jul 26, 2025 3:44 pm

Trump's energy strategy (still) fails to achieve its goals
July 24, 2025 , 12:23 pm .

Image
During his campaign, Trump promised to increase oil drilling with his slogan "Drill baby drill." (Photo: Alex Brandon / AP Photo)

Upon assuming his second term, Donald Trump inherited an energy sector in transition, with a growing shift toward renewable sources. But at the same time, the United States was already established as the world's leading producer of crude oil and the leading global exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Despite this interesting duality in the American energy landscape, Trump, as a staunch critic of the global warming theory, preferred to consolidate his energy strategy based on fossil fuels in order to achieve "energy independence." His plan promised:

Expediting drilling permits on federal lands and deepwater, reversing restrictions like the Biden administration's on the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
Revitalize the coal industry—an energy source the private sector is abandoning— by providing subsidies to plants at risk of closure and eliminating emissions standards.
Promote nuclear energy with incentives for modular reactors, a technology considered key to the national energy base.
Reorientation of funds and subsidies intended for clean energy toward fossil fuel projects.
Reduce environmental red tape, facilitating the construction of infrastructure such as pipelines and refineries.
Promote increased crude oil barrel production to impact the market and "drive down" prices.
The strategy sought not only to increase production but also to weaken OPEC's influence and position the United States as the leading LNG exporter, regardless of the potential for such an approach to lead to market saturation and tensions with allied countries.

KEY MEASURES AND FIGURES
During the first four months of 2025, U.S. oil production reached 13.32 million barrels per day (mbd), a 1.1% increase compared to 2024, according to the Energy Information Administration (EIA). This growth was concentrated in shale plays such as the Permian (Texas) and Bakken (North Dakota), where companies expanded operations thanks to accelerated permitting.

However, the back-and-forth over Trump's imposition of trade tariffs has generated uncertainty across the economy and in the oil industry. This has contributed to US producers slowing their drilling and completion activities this year.

In the United States, production costs per barrel are estimated at around $62 in various fields. This price is largely due to the new increase in production from OPEC+ .

Some companies believe certain projects are becoming less profitable. Therefore, the climate in the US oil industry remains cautious, which explains the modest 1% increase in production so far this year.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND RELEVANT MEASURES IN ENERGY MATTERS
Donald Trump has signed a series of executive orders based on his energy plan. These include:

Zero-Based Regulatory Budget to Unleash American Energy Power (April 9, 2025): Seeks to reduce the regulatory burden on the energy sector by periodically eliminating "outdated or counterproductive" regulations.
Declaration of a National Energy Emergency (January 20, 2025): Declares a national energy emergency and establishes measures to accelerate energy infrastructure projects, facilitate exploration and production of domestic resources, and review energy system vulnerabilities.
Unlocking Alaska's Extraordinary Resource Potential (January 20, 2025): Resumes exploration and production activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) that were suspended under the previous administration.
Ordering the Reform of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (May 23, 2025): Seeks to accelerate the development of advanced nuclear reactors and improve the regulatory efficiency of the nuclear sector.
The cornerstone of Trump's energy policy has been the elimination of regulatory barriers. This deregulation agenda has had a direct impact on the hydrocarbon sector and is facilitated by the executive order Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy Power, which establishes a framework for reviewing and eliminating unnecessary regulations in the energy sector. This measure has allowed companies to reduce operating costs.

In addition, specific tax incentives have been approved for the sector.

Expanding Oil and Gas Lease Tax Credits : The Trump administration proposed and successfully approved tax credits for companies investing in new exploration and production areas, especially on federal lands and in ANWR.
Eliminating restrictions on liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports : The administration has removed bureaucratic barriers to LNG exports, positioning the United States as a key player in the European and Asian markets.
Corporate tax reduction for hydrocarbon companies : A reduction in corporate tax was applied from 21% to 18% for companies investing in new exploration and production projects.
According to Trump, these measures have boosted investment in his country, but this has clearly not yet materialized in barrel production figures so far this year.

OBSTACLES AND FEASIBILITY OF TRUMP'S POLICY
A major challenge to the implementation of Trump's energy policy is the overall cost structure for hydrocarbon activities in the United States.

Despite the deregulation policy and favorable incentives for oil and gas companies, operators, service providers and supply chains maintain high costs in conventional crude oil fields and especially in unconventional crude oil fields ( shale oil ).

On the other hand, exogenous factors are converging in the oil market. The EIA has been reducing its forecast for global oil demand growth by 2025 by 400,000 bpd, citing economic uncertainty due to tariffs. Lower demand could curb prices, but it could also undermine investor confidence in production growth.

On the other hand, increased OPEC+ production has driven prices down.

While the current situation has managed to "bring down" oil prices, which has been part of Trump's promises, the overall picture is one of uncertainty for crude oil producers in the United States.

But this situation shouldn't be considered structural. Technically, Trump's measures haven't failed, so far. These are actions whose results are still pending.

The increase in barrel production in the United States, by just 1% so far this year, is representative of market dynamics, not policy.

Taken together, many of Trump's measures could be continued beyond his administration and offer extraordinary impetus to the United States' long-term strategy, which strengthens it as a major producer and exporter of fossil fuels, with the capacity to significantly impact the global market.

The problem is the current price environment, which must be considered temporary. Once prices rise, the feasibility of new oil developments in the United States will be guaranteed.

On the other hand, Trump's new policy climate also favors investment in new processes to reduce costs. US oil and gas companies are strengthening their strategy to deepen the use of new technologies, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, to improve processes in exploration, production, reservoir engineering, logistics, and transportation. This would allow many fields to be resilient to the current low-price climate.

In that scenario, the United States could continue to gradually increase its production, and its barrel count per day could increase slightly further, despite the current context.

Only then will the phrase "Drill, baby, drill" make sense to American companies. Uncertainty would be overcome, and the president's strategy could achieve its goals of increasing barrels of production.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/la ... -objetivos

I doubt that capitalism will save us from capitalism.

Google Translator

******

Trump’s Campaign Against Brazil Is About More Than Bolsonaro, Bilateral Trade, & BRICS
Andrew Korybko
Jul 25, 2025

Image

His goal is to subordinate Brazil as a vassal state so that it becomes the main “Fortress America” component of his “Global West” vision.

Brazil has come under tremendous pressure from Trump in recent weeks over former President Jair Bolsonaro’s trial, bilateral trade, and BRICS. This has correspondingly taken the form of him: publishing a letter of support for Bolsonaro demanding an “immediate end” of the case against him on charges of organizing a failed coup; threatening 50% tariffs on Brazil next month despite enjoying a trade surplus with it; and possibly tacking on another 10% solely on the basis of its membership in BRICS.

The economic dimension of this newfound pressure campaign might even escalate to an additional 100% tariff if Brazil continues trading with Russia after Trump’s 50-day deadline for a peace deal in Ukraine. As CBS News reported in mid-July, “Brazil is the biggest purchaser of Russian fertilizer products, crucial to supporting its soybean, sugar and coffee exports”, so it can’t realistically cut off trade with Russia. All the tariffs will be at Trump’s discretion, however, so he could lower or even waive them if a deal is reached.

Trump doesn’t just want the charges against his friend Bolsonaro dropped, guarantees put into place for further facilitating trade with the US and preventing the transshipment of more highly tariffed countries’ goods into its market, and for co-founder Brazil to distance itself from BRICS. His goal is to subordinate Brazil as a vassal state, regardless of whoever ends up leading it after the next presidential election in fall 2026, so that it becomes the main “Fortress America” component of his “Global West” vision.

The “Global West” refers to the US-led collection of states across Ibero-America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific, with the corresponding geopolitical projects being “Fortress America”, NATO, and AUKUS+ (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the Philippines, and South Korea). Brazil’s inclusion in “Fortress America” is integral to this project’s success since the failure to subordinate it, and importantly maintain this status indefinitely, would weaken US’ hegemony over the rest of Ibero-America.

That’s because Brazil is a rising pole in the emerging Multipolar World Order. This prestigious status is the result of its enormous population, impressive economy, and relative sovereignty vis-à-vis most other Ibero-American countries. Although drug cartels and their local thugs remain enduring security threats, they have nowhere near the military and political power as they do in Mexico, which is what holds Mexico back from playing the role that Brazil is also capable of and is why the US arms some of them.

The US’ plot to subordinate Brazil has flip-flopped over the years. The Obama Administration helped remove the ruling socialists after they’d grown too geopolitically independent but the Biden one helped Lula return to power after he came to embrace the Democrats’ liberal-globalist worldview while in prison as documented in the several dozen analyses enumerated at the end of this one here. The Trump Administration doesn’t just want to remove the socialists yet again but to more fully subordinate Brazil.

Hybrid warfare is the means to the end of either coercing Brazil into institutionalizing grossly lopsided trade ties with the US or suffering up to 160% tariffs for its refusal, which his meant to engineer the next election so that the socialists lose. Recent polls place Lula ahead in all scenarios if he runs again, however, so Brazilians might be patriotically rallying behind the socialists. If they can bear the pain long enough, then far from becoming the basis of “Fortress America”, Brazil might ultimately be its undoing.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/trumps-c ... -brazil-is

******

Trump to spend 1.26 billion dollars to open country’s largest immigrant detention center

The US Department of Defense has awarded a contract to Acquisition Logistics LLC to build a sprawling short-term ICE detention center with a capacity of 5,000 detainees

July 25, 2025 by Natalia Marques

Image
Protest against Trump's new ICE detention center, dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz". Photo: Craig Birchfield

The US Department of Defense has awarded a contract worth USD 1.26 billion to the Virginia-based company Acquisition Logistics LLC to build a sprawling short-term ICE detention center in the Fort Bliss army base in El Paso, Texas. The center is set to have a capacity of 5,000 detainees which would make it the largest immigrant detention center in the country.

The facility, much like the newly-minted “Alligator Alcatraz”, will be composed entirely of tents and temporary structures, raising the alarm about potential conditions of detention in the scorching dry heat of western Texas.

The reports emerging from detainees in the new detention facility in the Florida Everglades describe the perils of being so exposed to the elements. “We are in a cage of metal bars with the lights on 24 hours a day, and the mosquitoes seem like elephants,” said “Alligator Alcatraz” detainee Leamsy Izquierdo, a Cuban musician and US permanent resident, in a phone conversation with his partner.

“At a time when funding for education, housing, healthcare, and other essential social services is being cut, this administration is funneling millions of dollars to fuel its cruel, inhumane, and anti-immigrant agenda, one that continues tearing families, destabilizing communities, and dividing our nation,” said Fernando Garcia, the executive director of the Border Network for Human Rights (BNHR), in a statement.

This week, Human Rights Watch released a report documenting abuses at three Florida immigrant detention centers. Detainees interviewed for this report detailed horrific treatment in these facilities, including being shackled in buses for extended period of time without access to food, water, or working toilets, crammed into freezing, overcrowded holding cells, or forced to sleep on cold concrete floors under the constant glare of fluorescent lights.

One detainee described being forced to wait hours for lunch, then, alongside other detainees, being made to eat with his hands shackled behind his back. “We had to bend over and eat off the chairs with our mouths, like dogs,” he said.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/07/25/ ... on-center/

Image

my bad...

******

Even If He Did ...

... it wouldn't change much for Russia.

WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump is unlikely to follow through on his threat to place 100% tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil because it would worsen politically-damaging inflation pressures and his similar threat against buyers of Venezuelan oil has had limited success, especially in China. Trump said this month he would put 100% secondary tariffs on countries that buy Russian exports unless Moscow agrees to a major peace deal with Ukraine in 50 days, a deadline that would expire in early September.

Reuters gives a summary:

100% tariffs on Russian oil buyers would risk price spikes, global economy meltdown
Trump: current oil price is great, helps tame inflation
Tariff threat seen as political grandstanding by some trade partners
Trump's sanctions on Russia so far not directly over Ukraine war
China adapts to US sanctions, continues Venezuelan oil imports


Trump DOES NOT do anything which is not a political grandstanding, while not understanding that it weakens his (and the US) already weak position even more and makes it untenable. It is as simple as two times two. But we all know why he does it--it is not a statesmanship issue, it is a psychiatric one.

(more...)

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/07 ... e-did.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Mon Jul 28, 2025 3:17 pm

Trump says he is giving Putin “10 to 12 days” for ceasefire deadline
By CNN's Alejandra Jaramillo

Image
US President Donald Trump meets with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Trump Turnberry on July 28 in Turnberry, Scotland. Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

President Donald Trump said Monday he is reducing the 50-day deadline he had given to Russian President Vladimir Putin to 10 to 12 days to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine.

“Yeah, I’m going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today,” Trump told reporters while speaking alongside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer from his golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland.

“There’s no reason in waiting,” the president added. “I want to be generous but we just don’t see any progress being made.”

Trump also renewed his threat to Putin on secondary tariffs, saying, “And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs.” The president added, “I don’t want to do that to Russia.”

“You would think based on common sense, you would think you’d want to make a deal,” Trump said referring to the Russian president. “I guess we’ll find out.”

Speaking earlier, Trump said he was going to reduce the 50 days he had given Putin “to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer.”

“We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever,” Trump said earlier Monday.

https://us.cnn.com/politics/live-news/t ... s-07-28-25

Whipping those poodles and chihuahuas must have given Trump a new dose of delusion of his omnipotence(along with a stiffie). Or perhaps he's gotten some realization of Ukraine's military plight. Or mebbe somebody like Lindsey Graham told him Putin was stealing all of 'his' lithium.

Eyes roll in Moscow...

******

Cruel Executive Order on Homelessness Is Also Ineffective Policy—Unless Goal Is to Discipline Workers and Boost Prison Industry
Posted on July 28, 2025 by Conor Gallagher

The Trump administration, acting as an accelerant for the long-raging inferno that is US social policy cruelty, is now coming after the unhoused.

On Thursday, the president who is embroiled in a pedophilic sex abuse ring scandal, signed an executive order pushing local authorities to disappear homeless people from the streets. Let’s unpack what this means, how it’s likely to play out, why it’s so cruel, and more.

Here is the full text of Trump’s order, titled “Ending Crime and Disorder on America’s Streets,” which I’ll be dissecting in this post.

When All You Have Is a Hammer…

Trump’s order frames the country’s homelessness crisis as the product solely of mental illness and drug addiction. This is wrong, and is an attempt to hide the exceptional American rapaciousness and cruelty driving the increase in the unhoused.

A study from UCSF’s Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative last year was one of the deepest dives into California’s crisis in decades. It found that drug use and mental health problems are not the driver behind people losing housing; the primary reason is the increasing precariousness of the working poor.

The order does not mention the plethora of economic factors that are driving homelessness— low wages (between 40-60 percent of the homeless are employed)., no social safety net, and the astronomical house of housing aided by a national “information-sharing” cartel of mega landlords that dominate the market in certain cities and engage in price-fixing, homebuilder cartels constraining supply. the explosion of vacation rentals, a healthcare system in which we pay for insurance that denies us care and bankrupts the unlucky. That’s to name a few.

The study also showed how the homeless population is getting older and is often the result of just one bad break. From a Los Angeles Times write up:

“These are old people losing housing,” Dr. Margot Kushel told me. She’s the lead investigator on the study from UCSF’s Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, done at the request of state health officials.

“They basically were ticking along very poor, and sometime after the age of 50 something happened,” Kushel said. That something — divorce, a loved one dying, an illness, even a cutback in hours on the job — sparked a downward spiral and their lives “just blew up,” as Kushel puts it.

Kushel and her team found that nearly half of single adults living on our streets are over the age of 50. And 7% of all homeless adults, single or in families, are over 65. And 41% of those older, single Californians had never been homeless — not one day in their lives — before the age of 50.

Many homeless do suffer from mental illness and drug addiction. Hard numbers are difficult to come by, but in many cases these issues arose or were worsened after becoming homeless. Even the threat of losing one’s shelter—let alone it actually happening—can be an enormously stressful experience.

The UCSF study found that many succumb to drugs as a way to numb the pain of being chewed up and discarded by American society. It is also well-established that poverty and homelessness can lead to or worsen physical and mental health. For example, studies have shown PTSD is common after losing one’s home. It goes beyond just homelessness. For example, a recent study published in the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing finds that food insecurity is linked to severe mental illness.

And so, as is so often the case in the US, problems arising from inhumane social policy are dealt with as criminal justice issues. Much the same way the wars on crime and drugs shifted the focus from too few well-paying jobs to one of too many defectives among us, Trump’s order will help perform such a role with the homeless:

A reminder: framing homelessness as a problem of mental illness or addiction has been politically manufactured to divert attention from its *actual* causes—skyrocketing rents, poverty wages, gutted social supports—and to justify the removal of homeless people from public space.
10:20 AM · Jul 25, 2025


And for those who believe this is just a Trump problem that will go away with him, it’s worth noting that:

The problem predates Trump 2.0 and has grown considerably worse no matter which marketing department of the uniparty is in power.
The epicenter of the US homeless crisis is in California, a state with a Democrat supermajority.
Democrats are coalescing around an agenda of “abundance” as a solution, which they promise will deliver more housing. In reality, it shows the party rebranding its neoliberal market solutions with a heavy dose of libertarianism. And more power to Wall Street and Silicon Valley, which already dominate what passes as social planning in the US, ain’t gonna help anything aside from maybe yacht and private jet upgrades—and more vacation rentals:

WOW: New California Home Ownership Data

- Nearly 20% of homes in California are owned by investors
- Investors purchased 26.8% of all residential property sales during the first quarter of 2025
- Sierra County has a whopping 82% of single-family houses owned by investors
- Show more


Democrats like California Governor Gavin Newsom were out ahead of Trump on the issue. He signed an executive order a year ago calling for cities to “humanely remove encampments from public spaces.” That order, of course, also did nothing to address the systemic problems behind homelessness, including a lack of affordable housing and Social Security benefits not coming close to covering rent leading to skyrocketing numbers of homeless senior citizens. How “humane” can Newsom’s policy be?

As Deyanira Nevárez Martínez, an assistant professor of urban and regional planning at Michigan State University writes, Newsom’s approach effectively turns the issue over to the criminal justice system and “leads to forced displacement that makes people without housing more likely to be arrested and experience increased instability and trauma.” That’s exactly what Trump’s does too. Bipartisanship!

Even if we accept Trump’s premise that it’s all crazies and drug addicts, what of all the future homeless?

The number one problem for those on the front lines trying to get people into housing is that even when one person gets shelter, three more arrive to take their place on the streets. That is part of the reason that despite all the money thrown at the problem, it keeps getting worse. Of course to turn off the tap of people losing housing, the US would have to rethink its entire economic model that treats people as vessels of profit to be bled dry and discarded.

According to Fran Quigley who directs the Health and Human Rights Clinic at Indiana University McKinney School of Law, there are nine million US households that are behind on their rent right now. Will they all be deemed mentally ill and drug addicts once they can no longer keep up with the great American hamster wheel?

Even if we accepted Trump’s premise that homelessness is being driven by mental illness and drug addiction, the US isn’t equipped to offer effective help.

From the Vera Institute:

In the United States, people must wait an average of 48 days to access mental health or substance use services, and many struggle to afford needed services that are inaccessible without insurance.

While waiting lists for community-based psychiatric and mental health services grow longer, jails and prisons fill up with people experiencing treatable mental health conditions. Nonviolent behaviors associated with mental illness that could be avoided with adequate support—like loitering, disorderly conduct, and trespassing—are criminalized, resulting in the incarceration of people who need treatment, not punishment.

And so jails and prisons end up as the destination with the Los Angeles County jail system the largest “mental health care provider” in the country. Those who profit off the police state are more than happy to market themselves as mental health providers, as the Prison Policy Initiative explains:

Jails and prisons are often described as de facto mental health and substance abuse treatment providers, and corrections officials increasingly frame their missions around offering healthcare. But the reality is quite the opposite: people with serious health needs are warehoused with severely inadequate healthcare and limited treatment options. Instead, jails and prisons rely heavily on punishment, while the most effective and evidence-based forms of healthcare are often the least available.

This unsurprisingly results in an endless cycle of arrest for homeless people who use drugs and/or are mentally ill. The UCSF study found that roughly 20 percent of the state’s unhoused population entered homelessness from an institutional setting, such as jail and prison stays. And criminalization only makes the problem worse. From Governing:

The collateral consequences of even short-term jailing — such as loss of employment, separation from families, and fines and fees — increase the likelihood of future arrest while exposing arrested individuals to health risks and unsanitary conditions associated with jails.

And Trump’s order comes on the heels of that “Big, Beautiful Bill” that took a wrecking ball to Medicaid, the number one payer for addiction and mental health services. Even if the US had the capacity to forcibly treat people as Trump’s plan prescribes, studies show that coerced treatment is not effective. A recent study, “Use of Coercive Measures during Involuntary Psychiatric Admission and Treatment Outcomes: Data from a Prospective Study across 10 European Countries,” found that “all coercive measures were associated with patients staying longer in the hospital.”

So this order is cruel, ineffective, and deflects from the primary causes, i.e., unchecked American capitalism. But it gets even worse.

Trump’s Order Ends Housing First —the ONE Thing the US Is Doing Right.

From the order:

The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall take appropriate actions to increase accountability in their provision of, and grants awarded for, homelessness assistance and transitional living programs. These actions shall include, to the extent permitted by law, ending support for “housing first” policies that deprioritize accountability and fail to promote treatment, recovery, and self-sufficiency; increasing competition among grantees through broadening the applicant pool; and holding grantees to higher standards of effectiveness in reducing homelessness and increasing public safety.

This provision, as well as the order’s overall hostility to the entire concept of “housing first” would appear to endanger one effective national program—as well as local ones.

The US has actually been finding success cutting the number of homeless veterans. The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced in November that veteran homelessness rates dropped to a record low since detailed counting began in 2009. Officials counted 32,882 homeless veterans, down significantly from recent years and a 55.6 percent decrease from 2010.

While the overall number is still soberingly high, and the program is imperfect since it doesn’t address underlying economic causes that will continue to see vets cast onto the streets, it is progress. How did they do it?

Using a Housing First approach, which prioritizes getting a homeless individual into housing and then assists with access to health care and other support. Notably, the VA program does not try to determine who is “housing ready” or demand mental health or addiction treatment prior to housing. The Housing First model says that housing is a fundamental right and that housing programs should identify and address the needs of the people it serves from the people’s perspective. The VA is doing that by providing immediate access to permanent, subsidized, independent housing without treatment participation or sobriety prerequisites.

For this fiscal year—Oct. 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025—the VA budget for Veteran homelessness programs is $3.2 billion. That’s less than what the US has been spending per month on Ukraine since Feb. 2022.

It’s an example of what a real effort to get homeless off the streets in a humane way would look like. Instead, the US is now going in the opposite direction.

Where Is This Heading?

The trendline is obvious—and it’s accelerating.

We’ve now had years of homelessness increasing, followed by its criminalization, and now Trump ending what little effective policy there was.

What this will mean is a huge influx of individuals into the already-exceptional US carcarel state. We wrote back in December about the possibilities of what comes next, primarily how by deflecting attention away from the crimes of American capitalism while simultaneously expanding the reach of the carceral state — which weakens “free” labor — the criminalization of homelessness is a win-win for American plutocrats. That is now closer as we’re speeding down the dystopian superhighway (utopia to the accelerationists running the country). We see yet again why Trump and Project 2025 became favorite of the billionaire tech fascist crowd, which draws inspiration from the Zionists and their genocidal project in Palestine.

At its core homelessness and a police state response to it represents a fascistic disciplining of the workforce—another version of this honest take from Gurner Group founder Tim Gurner last year calling for a 40-50 percent rise in unemployment and “pain” in the economy to remind laborers that “they work for the employer.

Gurner Group founder Tim Gurner tells the Financial Review Property Summit workers have become "arrogant" since COVID and "We've got to kill that attitude." https://afr.com/politics/federal/albane ... ost=p557gn

The threat of imprisonment should one lose their job and housing offers quite the reminder. For decades the US has been moving towards removing restrictions on prisoner work and expanding the system — even if it puts forced labor in competition with “free” labor.

Back in 1929 the Supreme Court upheld a law that restricted the interstate sales of prisoner-produced goods, explaining that “free labor, properly compensated, cannot compete successfully with the enforced and unpaid or underpaid convict labor of the prison.”

That began to change in the 1970s, however. As neoliberalism took hold, Congress started to ease restrictions on private companies using prison labor. They were allowed to use it, but required to pay prevailing wages, most of which can be diverted to fund prisoners own imprisonment or otherwise stolen. Prison labor has steadily grown and it has numerous benefits for the plutocrats.

Gurner might be an Australian “apartment wunderkind,” but his beliefs aren’t confined to the Lucky Country. Indeed, such forms of coercion are precisely what capital likes about imprisoned workers. From Hatton’s Coerced: Work Under Threat of Punishment:

….the defining feature across all these forms of prison labor is the infliction of punishment, or the threat of punishment, to secure compliance. When incarcerated workers do not obey a command from the corrections officers who oversee their labor, they can be fined a week’s wages, put on “keeplock” (confined to one’s own cell), and put in solitary confinement. Because of these punishments, moreover, incarcerated people can lose opportunities for parole. The risks of noncompliance for incarcerated workers thus include losing crucial connections with friends and family, losing access to essential food, amenities, recreation, and freedom of movement (however constrained), and, for some, losing the possibility of future freedom.

The following is from the Urban Institute in 2003, but as Gurner’s comments demonstrate, there’s little reason to suspect such opinions have changed:

Employers strongly spoke of the quality of the inmate workforce in responses to the question of what they liked best about employing inmates. Responses of workforce “quality and productivity” far outweighed “lower costs” 53% to 7%. Additionally, employers rated inmates as somewhat more productive than a domestic workforce might be, and 92% said they “recommend” the inmate workforce to business associates. As one employer explains: “Inmates learn that the success of our company depends on the satisfaction of our customers with our product. Quality, service and price have to meet expectations. Our futures are intertwined…”

This data provides supporting evidence that in today’s environment, employers consider inmate workers to be productive workers—“more productive” than the domestic workforce— in a variety of manufacturing, assembly and services production settings.

Just how much does the US rely on prison labor?[1]

Image

He might be slightly overstating the case out of self interest but not by much. Imprisoned Arizonans, like most people on the outside, are forced to sell their labor for at least 40 hours a week. Many of the ones in official captivity earn just 10 cents an hour for their work, however.

Arizona, like many states, contracts with The GEO Group, one of the largest private prison companies. If that name sounds familiar, that’s because it was in the news recently due to its stock soaring following Trump’s victory and his promise to crack down on crime and illegal immigration.

The details of the contracts a state like Arizona signs with The GEO Group are telling. At Florence West prison, for example, Arizona guarantees GEO a 90% occupancy rate. The state must pay a per diem rate for 675 prisoners, regardless of how many people are actually incarcerated there, although the state is incentivized to make sure it’s at or near capacity. That’s because, as Arizona Department of Corrections Director David Shinn explains, prisoners are forced to provide labor “to city, county, local jurisdictions, that simply can’t be quantified at a rate that most jurisdictions could ever afford. If you were to remove these folks from that equation, things would collapse in many of your counties, for your constituents.”

So what amounts to slave labor helps keep taxes low on one end. And then there’s the profit motive on the other, as explained by Arizona Rep. John Kavanagh:

“You have to guarantee that they’re going to have people there, and they’re going to have a profit that they make, they’re going to have income,” Kavanagh said. “No one’s going to enter into a contract when you can’t guarantee the income that they expect. That’s kind of based on basic business.”

“Basic business” in the US also includes the widespread availability of low-wage and easily exploitable laborers for American capital. And Trump’s order helps ensure it will continue to be in abundance—one way or another.

In conclusion, not good.

Notes

For a detailed breakdown, here’s Erin Hatton, professor of sociology at the State University of New York at Buffalo with some numbers showing where the situation is today:
In the United States today, more than 2 million people are incarcerated in prisons and jails, another 4.5 million people are under supervision via probation or parole, and 70 million people have some type of criminal record. The carceral state has thus exerted its grip on nearly half of the U.S. workforce. In fact, the combined prison and jail population of the United States roughly equals the number of employees that Walmart, the world’s largest employer, employs across the globe.

Hatton breaks the types of jobs in US prisons and their effects on “free” labor:

The first category is facility maintenance, also known as “regular” or “non-industry” jobs. In these roles, incarcerated people work to keep the prison running; they sustain its operations. The vast majority of incarcerated workers perform this type of labor…Because wages for this work are invariably minimal—ranging from no pay at all in many southern states to $2 per hour in Minnesota and New Jersey—this form of labor saves prison operators untold sums of money by supplanting free-world, full-wage workers.

The second category is “industry” jobs, which are positions in the government-run prison factories that were launched in the 1930s. These account for just under five percent of state and federal prisoner employment. People who labor in these factories produce a wide range of goods and services for sale to government agencies: office furniture and filing cabinets; road signs and license plates; uniforms, linens, and mattresses for prisons and hospitals; wooden benches and metal grills for public parks; even body armor for military and police. In Texas, Georgia, and Arkansas state prisons, incarcerated workers receive no wages for this labor. On average, state and federal prisoners earn $0.33–$1.41 per hour for this work (as compared to an average of $0.14–$0.63 per hour for the facility maintenance jobs described above).

The third category of incarcerated labor is for private-sector companies that set up shop inside U.S. prisons. Such jobs employ just 0.3 percent of the U.S. prison population. These are the highest paid prison jobs, because private-sector companies are legally obligated to pay “prevailing wages” in order to avoid undercutting non-prison labor. However, incarcerated workers do not actually receive these “prevailing wages.” Private employers often pay only the minimum wage, not the prevailing wage, and legal loopholes allow them to pay even less. Moreover, incarcerated workers’ wages are subject to many deductions and fees, which are capped at a whopping 80 percent of gross earnings. In other words, U.S. prisons seize most of the workers’ wages in these jobs. Further, some states have mandatory savings programs that take away an additional portion of the pay. Thus, even though regulations mandate free-world compensation for private-sector jobs in prison, prison rates prevail.

The final category is work that occurs outside of the prison, through various labor arrangements such as work-release programs, outside work crews, and work camps. While no concrete data are available, reportssuggest that such jobs are more common than both public and private industry jobs, though not as common as facility maintenance jobs. This category is highly heterogeneous, including work for public works, nonprofit agencies, and private companies. In work-release programs, prisoners typically maintain free-world jobs—at free-world wages, though subject to prison-world deductions—and then return to the prison after work hours. In prison work crews, incarcerated workers leave the prison or jail facility during work hours to perform public works, or “community service” jobs, such as fighting fires and cleaning highways, park grounds, and abandoned lots. Such workers typically return to prison at the end of the workday, unless their labor—as in the case of wildfires—is far from the prison; in those cases, they are typically housed in prison-like facilities, such as fire camps. In one instance, incarcerated women who labored for a multi-million dollar egg farm in Arizona were relocated to company housing so that the farm could retain its low-wage and reportedly “more compliant” incarcerated labor force despite the COVID-19 lockdowns that would halt the prison’s work-release program.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/07 ... isons.html

******

"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Tue Jul 29, 2025 3:10 pm

TRUMP’S TURNBERRY GAME ISN’T GOLF – IT’S BANKRUPTCY BAILOUT AND AN 18 USC 201 OFFENCE (BRIBERY)

Image

By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

President Donald Trump’s long weekend trip to Scotland wasn’t to meet King Charles III; that meeting has been set for mid-September.

He met the President of European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, not to negotiate trade terms but to announce the conclusion of what Trump called “probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity trade or beyond trade;” also, “the biggest deal. People don’t realize. This is bigger than any other deal. We have, uh, great countries, great countries. Uh, I’m familiar with many of ’em, so are you. And, uh, this is really the biggest deal. This is the, I guess we’re the biggest, uh, out there.”

He also met British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The two hours he spent with each of them was less than the games of golf he played with his son Eric Trump, and with Warren Stephens, the US Ambassador to the UK since May and another of the asset speculators who have financed Trump’s re-election campaign.

Trump’s purpose in Scotland was to advertise the game of golf on the two resort courses he owns in Scotland — Turnberry in Ayrshire in the southwest, and in Aberdeen in the northeast. “The golf was, uh, the golf was beautiful,” Trump told the press beside von der Leyen. “It’s, uh, golf can never be bad, even if you play badly, it’s, uh, it’s still good. If you had a bad day on the golf course, it’s okay. Uh, it’s better than other days”.

That’s Trump’s game. But Trump’s golf business is in financial trouble within the Trump group of companies in the US; and in the financial accounts it is required to report to the UK Companies House.

Advertising the value of the assets, as Trump’s game-playing visit has been planned to display, also exposes the financial vulnerability and invites rescue at a takeover premium. If the Trump plan is to pressure the British and Scots authorities into designating Turnberry for the British Open Championship; or if it is an advertisement to sell to an investor who has needs of his own from the US Government, then the scheme may amount to an offence under 18 U.S. Code § 201: “Whoever…being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for: (A) being influenced in the performance of any official act.”

That’s bribery.

On the latest audited financial data, reported this month in the widely read London magazine Private Eye, the two Trump golf courses and associated hotels are earning significantly less revenue than they cost to operate, and are loss-making. The Turnberry complex, owned by Golf Recreation Scotland Limited has a single director, Eric Trump, and reports its financials at UK Companies House. It owes other Trump companies £124 million, has accumulated net losses of almost £78 million; pays no UK tax; and its liabilities far exceed the £55 million book value Trump claims or the £42 million he paid to purchase the asset in 2014.

On May 29, this year, the company, identifying the President as exercising significant control through the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, was facing a strike-off at the register. This was then solved the following day.

The golf course and hotel in Aberdeenshire are owned by another UK Companies House- registered entity called Trump International Golf Club Scotland Limited. Its controversial history since Trump purchased it in 2006 can be followed here. The two directors are Trump’s sons, Eric and Donald Jr.

Image

According to the last financial report in the files of Companies House, the Aberdeen complex was loss-making for 2023; accumulated losses came to almost £19 million; it owed its Trump group creditors £53 million while its asset value was booked at £37 million.

According to the White House calendar, most of Trump’s time over the weekend was spent at Turnberry. He arrived at Aberdeen on Monday afternoon.

Image
Source: https://rollcall.com/factbase/trump/calendar/

During this time Trump had nothing to say on President Vladimir Putin or Russia. He did mention the Ukraine war once. “And, uh, we’re gonna be sending now, uh, military equipment and other equipment to NATO and they’ll be doing what they want. But I guess as for the most part, working with, uh, Ukraine.”

Instead, Trump twice mentioned his location at Turnberry Golf Club, showing it off. “It’s an honour to have you,” he told von der Leyen on Sunday, “at the new ballroom at Turnberry… today I’m playing the best course I think in the world, Turnberry, even though I own it, it’s probably the best course in the world, right?”

He then tweeted an endorsement by the international golf champion, Gary Player. As the video shows Trump hitting the golf ball, the soundtrack repeats “Good shot”.

Image
Source: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum ... 3256769586

In the press filming of Trump making his shots, the golf ball is visible only until it is struck. In this lengthy film of one of Trump’s Turnberry rounds, the ball is not visible after Trump putts it towards the hole. The flag pole remains in place; the ball disappears and is not retrieved.

Just before one of his aides closed the press conference with von der Leyen on Sunday, Trump was asked a planted question: “You’ll be visiting your Irish golf course anytime soon, Doonbeg? “Trump: I will. I love Doonbeg. I, I’ll go, so not in this trip, but I’ll go soon. Okay. Thank you very much.”

https://johnhelmer.net/trumps-turnberry ... more-92183

Golf is a bourgeois affectation and an environmental nightmare.

Image

******

Danny Davis ...

... being a true strategist (he always is) for 30 seconds straight. But we all know Trump cannot solve anything--he is too deep now in we all know what.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9obVyBw_ ... ture=share

Trump's behavior is that of the prisoner on the execution day--missing points, behaving out of character and situation, strained expression.



As some commenters pointed out--a very strange choice of words: "I never had a PRIVILEGE to go to this island"(c). Freudian slip?

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/07 ... davis.html

******

BREAKING – Trump “Fed Up” w/Putin: NEW DEADLINE 10-12 Days – Col. Daniel Davis
July 28, 2025

One point Davis makes in his analysis is to speculate on why Trump is saying things that don’t make any sense. He wonders if it might be the product of a cognitive problem with Trump. Personally, I don’t think it’s necessarily a product of a cognitive problem, I think it’s a product of Trump’s compulsive bullshitting, especially to cover up his incompetence. – Natylie[/b]

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/07/bre ... iel-davis/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14445
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Wed Jul 30, 2025 3:57 pm

WHEN NEGOTIATION FAILS, TRY BRIBERY; WHEN THAT FAILS TRY EXTORTION; WHEN THAT FAILS, FORCE

Image
B y John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

Capitulation or obliteration:

The President of the European Commission and the British Prime Minister have just demonstrated to President Vladimir Putin that there are only two options in dealing with the US President, and negotiations aren’t one of them.

Read the verbatim record of what Trump told Putin during his press conference with Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday as he and President Ursula von der Leyen have chosen to capitulate themselves. The video record can be viewed here.

The record also reveals that Trump planted a reporter’s question so that he could publicly demand from Starmer his multi-million dollar golf course bribe – a 15-year imprisonment crime in US law:

“Question: Mr. President, can we come to Turnberry, if I may? Have you or will you enlist the prime minister in your effort to bring the open back to Turnberry? And Prime Minister, you described this beautiful course. Do you agree with the president that it’s time to bring the Open back to Turnberry?

Keir Starmer: Well, as you know, that’s not a matter directly for me. That’s for the sporting authorities. But, look, I mean, it is absolute — the first time I’ve been here. It’s absolutely magnificent, both inside and out. And looking at the courses itself and the building, it’s — it’s incredible. But the decision on the Open is not a decision for me, as you’ll understand.”

Trump was pressing because UK officials have been telling the London newspapers the Trump bribe is too expensive for them to pay. The British Open Golf championship had not been held at Turnberry since 2009, five years before Trump bought it, a UK official told a newspaper in February, because the course “needed tens, or hundreds, of millions of pounds of investment to improve its accessibility by public transport and by road as well as improved hotel facilities.” In April, Starmer’s subordinates were still trying. “The government is doing everything it can to get close to Trump. One concrete thing is that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) have been involved in pushing for the Open to return to Trump-owned Turnberry.”

Listen to the new discussion with Nima Alkhorshid in the new podcast on Wednesday afternoon, Moscow time. https://www.youtube.com/@dialogueworks01/streams
Question: Mr. President, follow up on Russia. Earlier, you said that you were going to change the deadline from 50 days.

Donald Trump: Yeah.

Question: What is your new deadline —

Donald Trump: –I’m going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today. There’s no reason in waiting. There’s no reason in waiting. It’s 50 days. I want to be generous, but we just don’t see any progress being made…



Question: We can all sense your frustration with Vladimir Putin.

Donald Trump: Yeah.

Question: Do you think he’s been lying to you about his intentions in Ukraine?

Donald Trump: Well, I don’t want us to use the word lying. All I know is we’d have a good talk and it seemed on — let’s say three occasions it seemed that we were going to have a — a ceasefire and maybe peace. And you’d divide it up and you do whatever you have to do that — obviously to get to the end, and all of a sudden missiles are flying into Kyiv and other places…And I say, “What’s that all about? I spoke to him three, four hours ago, and it looked like we were on our way.” And then I’d say forget it and I’m not going to talk anymore. You know, this has happened on too many occasions. And I don’t like it. I don’t like it.”



Question: Mr. President, you moved up the deadline. It’s now 10 or 12 days. Is the sanction the same, that you’re going to slap a 100 percent tariff on anybody who does business with Russia? And what’s –

Donald Trump: So, what I’m doing is we’re going to do secondary sanctions unless we make a deal. And we might make a deal. I don’t know. I don’t know. You don’t know. It’s — we’ve done so many peace deals. This is the one I started out with. And, you know, this is — I know President Putin called me. He wanted to know if I could help him with Iran. I said, no, I don’t need your help with Iran, I need your help with Russia. And so that’s the one deal that continues to linger. And you know, we’re losing 5,000 — they’re losing. I’m not losing, you’re not losing, but 5,000 Russian and Ukrainian kids a week are dying and that’s not mentioning the people that are dying also in towns where you know he’s lobbing missiles into certain towns, like Kyiv. And he’s got to make a deal. It’s — too many people are dying. It’s a really bloody war and the five — they’re really telling me that number is obsolete. It’s like seven.

Keir Starmer: That’s terrible.

Donald Trump: So you have 7,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers dying every single week for no reason whatsoever. So you would think based on common sense, you would think he’d want to make a deal. We’ll find out.

Question: [Inaudible] publicly, have you had any other trade conversations with the Russians reiterating this?

Donald Trump: In what?

Question: Reiterating this new pressure and deadline?

Donald Trump: You know, we’re going to have a — yeah. I mean, well, you’re the press, I’m reiterating it to you. Yeah, I’d say 10 to 12 days. I’ll announce it probably tonight or tomorrow, but there’s no reason to wait. If you know what the answer is going to be, why wait? And it would be sanctions and maybe tariffs, secondary tariffs. You know what a secondary tariff is. And look, the Russian economy — I don’t want to do that to Russia. I love the Russian people. They’re great people. I don’t want to do that to Russia. But this thing — they’re losing a lot of Russians. They’ve lost a million Russians and that’s the, you know, sons. That’s the sons and daughters of uh, Russian families. They leave the house, they go, bye, mom, bye, dad and then they get blown away. And Ukrainians too. Look what — look at Ukraine, it’s a disaster what’s happened there, but it continues to go on. As you know, we made a deal where the European Union is essentially involved, but it’s NATO and we’re — we’re supplying weapons to NATO. NATO’s now paying, because the United States, because of Biden’s in for $350 billion, the European nations were in for about $100 billion. Should be the opposite way, by the way, because we have a big ocean in between, should be the opposite way. But I think that eventually something’s going to happen. It should happen fast. So many people are dying. You know, when I settled out with Congo and Rwanda, they lost almost eight million people, and it just made so much sense. And if I didn’t get involved, they wouldn’t have done it. They weren’t even thinking about settling it. It was just going on forever. And nobody could go into those territories because they’d get killed. They’d get killed. And now they have a — I hear it’s a whole different ball game. We settled it. This is one that should be settled, Russia, Ukraine, this is one that really should be settled.


Question: Mr. President, with the EU deal last night — you talked during the campaign about President Putin respecting you and that helping you to have a relationship with him. Do you still feel that way, that he respects you, considering the conversations you’ve had that have been really nice?

Donald Trump: Yeah, I’ve always gotten along with President Putin. I have had a great relationship with him. And he went through the Russia, Russia, Russia, hoax too. You know, I mean, it was — we used to talk about it. We used to say, you know, it’s too bad we really can’t do anything between our countries, because if we did, they’d say, oh, it’s, you know, some — look, I was tough on Putin because I was the one that closed up Nord Stream and Biden came along and opened it up. I was very tough on Putin in — in one way, but we got along very well. And I never — you know, I never really thought this would happen. I thought we’d be able to negotiate something. And maybe that’ll still happen, but it’s — it’s very late down the process. So, I’m disappointed. And, you know, the funny thing is that their economy isn’t that big. And it’s having a hard time right now, but it’s a relatively small economy. A strong military but strong economy. And it used to be a strong economy, now it’s not. He’s going through a lot economically. It’s not easy. But it’s pretty small, you know, compared to that magnificent size of that land. The land is massive. It’s got, I guess, nine time zones or something. It’s a massive piece of land. Russia could be so rich. It could be so rich. It could be thriving like practically no other country. And they’re holding that back because we can’t — he wants to do trade deals with us. He talks about it all the time. He wanted to. And I envisioned that, a lot of trade with Russia. They have a lot of valuable things. When you talk about rare earth, they have serious rare earth, right? They have just about every form you can have. So, you know, Russia could be such — so rich right now. Instead they spend all their money on war. They spend everything on war and killing people, and it doesn’t make sense to me. I thought he would want to end this thing quickly. I really felt it was going to end. But every time I think it’s going to end, he — he kills people.

Question: Could a meeting help? And are you considering — that’s been proposed, a meeting?


Donald Trump: I don’t know. I’m — I’m not — you know, I’m not so interested in talking anymore. He’s a — he talks. We have such nice conversations, such respectful and nice conversations, and then people die the following night in a — with a missile going into a town and hitting — I mean, recently I guess the nursing home, but they hit other things. Whatever they hit people die. So, I don’t — we’ll see what happens.
https://johnhelmer.net/when-negotiation ... more-92191

Does anybody, even his fans, think Trump gives a rat's ass about 'people dying'?

*******

Is the Trump ‘mystique’ broken? Does MAGA sense betrayal?

Alastair Crooke

July 29, 2025

The Epstein cloud is metastasizing and becoming a rallying point for deep-seated popular alienation.

The Epstein cloud is metastasizing and becoming a rallying point for deep-seated popular alienation from certain ruling strata. The public begrudgingly has become resigned to accept that their ‘rulers’ routinely lie and steal, but nonetheless they (particularly within the MAGA faction) have dimly come to understand that there may be vice within the body public which they regard as too detestable to imagine. People have caught on that Trump was in one way or another (even as a by-stander) linked to that whole degraded culture.

This is not likely to pass easily – or perhaps pass at all. Trump was elected to drain all such tangled webs of interlinked oligarchy, power structures and of intelligence services acting to unseen interests. That’s what he promised: America First.

Distraction from Epstein likely won’t work. The exploitation, abuse and destruction of the lives of untold numbers of children in the pursuit of power, wealth and diabolical debauchery cuts to the deepest quick of moral being. It cannot be distracted away by pointing to other élite vile monetary and power-plays. The abuse (and worse) inflicted on children stands apart in its own hellish category.

Trump may say that he’s done nothing legally wrong. But the point is that he’s now tainted – very seriously. He may consequently be entering Presidential lame-duck territory, barring some deus ex machina occurrence sufficient to deflect public attention.

Just to be clear, it is in Trump’s character to mightily resist becoming a ‘lame-duck’ President. And here lies the geo-political danger. Trump needs headline distractions and he needs ‘wins’.

However, he is at a weakened point now where the Security State and its Congressional allies are seizing more control. Equally, many in the nexus that links politicians and officials in the U.S., UK and Israel to deep business and intelligence ties will be extremely adverse to their exposure. Individuals, including the imprisoned Ghislaine Maxwell may prove dangerous, like a drowning man, who in his panic seizes on the nearest person only to drown the both of them.

Trump’s narrow-minded foreign policy team has taken the President’s foreign policy initiatives into a cage, whose bars have names such as ‘arrogance and hubris’.

On Ukraine, Trump has given Moscow what is effectively 50 days to capitulate to the Kellogg ceasefire ultimatum, or to face consequences.

Whilst third-party 100% sanctions – affecting mostly China and India’s energy imports from Russia – have been utterly dismissed by China (and likely will be by India too), Trump will be under pressure from his hawks in Congress to do something to inflict pain on Russia.

The problem is that the war-chest is empty. Neither the U.S. nor Europe hold a weapons inventory of any consequence to the war. Even were they to pay and order missiles or other weaponry now, it would be months until delivered.

Trump however needs quick wins/diversions.

Absent any meaningful inventory, Trump can only effectively escalate by using long-range missiles targeting Moscow or St Petersburg. Tomahawk 2,000 km range missiles are in the U.S. inventory (and were discussed byTeam Trump, David Ignatius has reported.

And what if these elderly Tomahawk missiles are easily shot down by Russian forces? Well, then there is a void. A serious void. Because there is nothing between the provision of token items of weaponry (a handful of Patriot missiles) to the U.S. pre-positioned tactical nukes that could be launched from fighter jets stationed in Britain.

At this point Trump would be hurtling toward a Big War with Russia.

Is there a plan ‘B’? Well … yes. It is to bomb Iran again, as an alternative to escalating against Russia.

Iranians think that another strike on Iran is likely, and Trump has said that he might do just that. So Iran is all-out preparing for such an eventuality.

It is quite possible that Trump has been briefed that the consequence to major strikes on Iran would be the effective missile-imposed de-militarisation of Israel – causing profound consequences in the U.S. polity, as well as the region.

It is also quite possible that Trump disregards such briefing, preferring to see Israel as “so good” (the exclamation he made as the Israeli sneak attack on 13 June was underway).

And in the Middle East right now? It looks as if Netanyahu is pulling the strings for Trump. Gaza is already a scandal – a war crimes scandal, with every prospect of getting worse.

Max Blumenthal reports that “when Tucker Calson alleged that Epstein had ties to Israeli Intelligence [and that this fact explained] why Trump is covering up [the Epstein Affair], the Israelis seemingly took fright. Naftali Bennett, the former Israeli Prime Minister, was summoned to declare that he had dealt, every day, with the Mossad and that Jeffrey Epstein did not work for the Mossad and was not an Israeli agent. He then threatened Carson, saying: ‘We won’t stand for this’. The Israeli Minister for Diaspora Affairs also denounced Tucker Carson. It is like the relationship between the U.S. Conservative movement and Israel is cracking up over Epstein”, Blumenthal suggests.

Netanyahu perhaps senses trouble ahead for Israel in the U.S., as young Americans and MAGA followers turn on Trump for having betrayed ‘America First’; for ‘co-owning’ the Gaza massacre; the Israeli-U.S. led Syria sectarian civil war; the bombing of Iran; and the despoilation of Lebanon.

Eighty-one percent of Americans, polls suggest, want all documents related to Epstein released. Two-thirds — including 84% of Democrats and 53% of Republicans — think the government is covering up evidence regarding his ‘client list’ and death. Trump’s disapproval rating stands at 53% currently.

Netanyahu is (perhaps consequentially) on a hurried rampage to impose ‘Greater Israel’. ‘Impose’, because the original Abraham Accords were ostensibly an agreement to normalise with Israel. Today, under military threat, Arab states are being compelled to accept Israeli terms – and subjugation to Israel.

It represents a travesty of the former Israeli notion of an alliance of minorities. Today, the ‘minorities’ (sometimes fractured majorities) are deliberately being set one against the other. The U.S. and Israel haveagain introduced ISIS 2.0 into the Middle East. The executions of Alawites, Christians and Shia in Syria are the direct consequence.

The prospect is of a devastated Middle East, with only the Gulf monarchies serving as obedient islands amid the wider landscape of internecine war, ethnic killing and Balkanised polities.

The new Middle East …?

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... -betrayal/

******

Sundown on the Potemkin Empire: Trump's Trouncing of Ursula Makes For Great Theater, But Little Else?
Simplicius
Jul 30, 2025

Trump made waves this week with his major economic subjugation of Europe on the announcement of his 15% tariffs, made before a stooped and servile Ursula von der Leyen. But as with everything which pours forth from the Trump administration’s victory fountain there are finer nuances worth a closer examination.

Hat tip to resident analyst William Schryver for alerting us to the recent piece by a fellow Substacker who devised a compelling argument for why Trump’s major ‘EU coup’ may have in fact been nothing more than another oversold goose egg:

Warwick Powell's Substack
The Great Entanglement
In the world of high politics and geopolitical theatre, perception often matters more than reality. And no one plays this theatre better than Donald Trump. Last week, Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emerged from a photo-op-heavy meet touting a raft of “historic” economic and security agreements. The U.S. President boasted ab…
Read more
3 days ago · 145 likes · Warwick Powell
Full disclosure: there are many ways to think about this, and many who disagree with this particular angle—but it’s worth a consideration nonetheless. The fact that we even have to argue whether such “massive boons” are having any restorative effect on the US, I suppose, is a bad sign in and of itself: constant trumpeting of astronomical figures—hundreds of billions saved by DOGE here! Another twelve-figure batch pocketed by tariffs there!—never quite directly translates into anything tangible. Of course, it’s all yet young and we must allow more time for such things to structurally percolate, but the years of hollow victory bells have exhausted all of us.

Powell begins his exegesis with a declaration I agree with: that perception matters more than reality, more than ever today in our increasingly ‘simulated world’, where money and economies themselves are nothing more than grossly over-counted hyper-leveraged debt-and-fiat instruments.

He goes on to argue that Trump’s unprecedented ‘coup’ over abject Ursula was actually a European triumph over the easily-cajoled nectarine narcissist.

But look beneath the bombast, and a different picture emerges. The picture is paradoxically not of European weakness per se (or vassalage as self-loathing Europeans would be tempted to say), but of European entrapment strategy from a position of relative weakness. If anything, this “deal” locks the United States deeper into Europe’s security and economic architecture, not the other way around. And it does so by using the one thing Trump cannot resist: the illusion of winning.

His reasoning is that virtually all the keystone promises of the deal are phony or impossible to fulfill—this includes the $600B in European investment in the US, $750B in US LNG purchases, and the like. The headline 15% tariff deal likewise is disregarded as impotent for a clever reason: the percentage is not quite high enough to trigger production line relocations, for instance back to the US, but is just high enough to essentially saddle everyone with higher prices and more debt, without really affecting any desired structural economic changes for the benefit of the American people. Mr. Powell calls it “the worst of both worlds”:

It imposes frictional costs on the U.S. economy without achieving any structural shift in the geography of production. Put plainly 15% is painful enough to hurt enterprises and households, but not painful enough to change production location decisions.

Quick note: some argue the 15% is low enough where the importers will be paying it rather than the consumer—but this is a kind of amateur understanding, if one really thinks the buck will not be passed along in some way. The importing companies have many tricks by which they can pretend to eat the cost yet still recoup it from the consumer—for instance, they’ll simply ‘shrinkflate’ some other unrelated domestic product to balance out the losses. And even if they didn’t, these are still American companies, which has long-term compounding economic effects on the country as a whole, which transfers to the consumer down the line.

Opiate for the masses: Shylock-in-chief and resident Tariff Circus Barker says the EU will “pay the tariffs”—lies so glabrous they smile back at you!:(Video at link.)

Image
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2025 ... r-in-chief

One might argue: but these “higher prices” and consumer pains are balanced by the EU’s promise of monumental investment in the US economy with the aforementioned trillions in LNG and other so-called purchases. The problem is, these figures appear made out of thin air in the same now-popular practice so regularly witnessed in Ukraine: where for instance Patriot missiles were promised only to have Germany and others subsequently squabble over who’s paying for what or how.

Similarly here, Powell argues that $750B in LNG purchases over three years is laughable owing to the naked math of it all:

Let’s start with the most audacious number: $750 billion in LNG purchases over three years. In 2024, the EU imported roughly 45 billion cubic meters (bcm) of U.S. LNG, valued at about $16–19 billion. In the first half of 2025 alone, it took in another 46.5 bcm, on track for nearly 93 bcm for the full year; that’s roughly $33–39 billion, assuming market prices of $10–12/MMBtu.

In short, the EU would need to increase both volume and/or price more than six-fold to hit the $250 billion annual target. This is not remotely feasible.


A mere day later, this view was vindicated by several mainstream powerhouses:

Image
https://www.politico.eu/article/eus-600 ... te-sector/

After pledging to invest $600 billion in the US economy, the EU admitted it doesn’t have the power to follow through. That’s because the money is planned to come exclusively from private sector investment — which Brussels has no authority over.

The article above explains that the EU commission already admitted mere hours after the “huge deal” was signed that the promised investment is to come from private corporations which have had no incentives offered to them for such a thing, which means the entire charade is nothing more than another empty show of ‘wishful thinking’, meant to glaze us with a brief PR tableau.

But the idea that the private sector can be relied upon to provide that level of investment was met with skepticism.

"This part of the deal is largely performative," Nils Redeker from the Jacques Delors Centre think tank told POLITICO. "[The EU] is not China, right? So nobody can tell private companies how much they invest in the U.S."


These days, virtually all foreign policy is conducted in this way. The tempo of our hyper-connected digital times has facilitated a kind of simulacrum where no exaggeration, lie, or absurdity is too great so long as it can be quickly flushed away by an even greater one. If one isn’t available, the mainstream media magicians are tasked with waving their hands over some new ‘crisis’ or ‘outrage’ to cover the tracks of whatever needs to be forgotten.

But why, you ask, does Powell ultimately reach the conclusion that the deal is not merely a hologram, but on the contrary a cunning triumph by the decaying Europeans? The answer lies in a compelling thesis that the Maggot Queen’s chief objective was to ensnare Trump and the US in Europe’s politics and the Euro-deep state’s Forever War. He concludes:

By offering inflated figures, headline-making numbers, and “big wins,” the EU ensures that:

The U.S. defence industry is financially bound to Europe;

The U.S. energy sector is locked into Europe but with limited capacity to actually deliver on the stated numbers, which means European buyers are back on the market anyway;

The U.S. financial system continues to absorb European capital, which is only a function of persistent European trade surpluses vis-a-vis the US; and

Any attempt by the U.S. to reduce its European footprint would now come at an enormous domestic economic cost.

In effect, Europe has engineered strategic entanglement for the U.S. in European security affairs under the guise of submission. Trump thinks he’s winning, but the structural reality is that the U.S. is being burdened with more responsibility, more expectations and more economic exposure.


Now, perhaps the above conclusion is a tad oversold for dramatic effect. Without truly crunching the economic figures in a more thorough way it’s uncertain just how ‘cunning’ or deliberate this European twist really is. But it’s true that under the guise of giving Trump’s ego a much needed economic arm-shot, Europe managed to at least maneuver him into perpetually supporting the European MIC and by extension the Ukraine war. This is not a European victory, per se—it is a grave disaster for the futures of average European citizens—but it is a victory for the Euro-deep state, the Brussels and London cabals controlled by generational private finance, the bankster clan which must hold power at all costs and cannot allow a rival system to emerge on the global stage, much less their doorstep.

(Much more at link.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/sun ... ire-trumps

******

Analysis: Donald Trump’s long history of fake history
Analysis by Daniel Dale

Image
President Donald Trump puts on a "Make America Great Again" hat on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, DC, on Friday, July 4. Kent Nishimura/Bloomberg/Getty Images

President Donald Trump told a story on Monday about how he “made a correct prediction” about the outcome of the United Kingdom’s 2016 Brexit referendum while he was visiting his golf course in Scotland “the day before the vote.”

“You remember?” he asked reporters.

They couldn’t have remembered. It didn’t happen.

Trump actually visited Scotland the day after the Brexit referendum, not the day before it. And while he did say about three months prior that he thought the UK would end up leaving the European Union, he made no public predictions in an interview the day before the vote – saying he personally favored Brexit but also that “I don’t think anybody should listen to me because I haven’t really focused on it very much.”

Trump’s imaginary story about these events nine years ago might be considered trivial compared to his lies about pressing topics like inflation and the war in Ukraine. But it’s part of a pattern – a long line of similarly fabricated tales from the president about his own history and world history.

And the pattern has a purpose. Trump’s stories serve to exaggerate his foresight about and knowledge of domestic and foreign affairs, embellish his biography and record in office, and diminish his political opponents.

The stories tend to be colorful even though they’re fake. Trump’s historical fiction is sprinkled with vivid details and make-believe quotes, all the better to make it seem authentic and get it to stick in the minds of voters.

A White House official, responding to CNN’s questions on condition of anonymity, noted that Trump correctly predicted Brexit and then said, “He was in Scotland before the vote.” The official didn’t acknowledge that, contrary to what Trump claimed Monday and has claimed for years, he wasn’t there the day before the Brexit vote and didn’t make a prediction that day.

Image
In this June 25, 2016 photo, Donald Trump speaks to the media on the golf course at his Trump International Golf Links in Aberdeen, Scotland. Carlo Allegri/Reuters/File

Here is a fact check of eight other examples of false Trump stories about the past from the last two months alone:

His false claim that he issued a “don’t go in” warning against the 2003 invasion of Iraq
His false story about a supposed conversation with his late uncle about the Unabomber
His false claim that he was the person who deployed the National Guard during civil unrest in Minneapolis in 2020
His false claim that he signed a law in 2020 to impose automatic 10-year prison sentences on people who damage monuments
His false claim that he was being sarcastic when he repeatedly promised to end Russia’s war on Ukraine within 24 hours of returning to office
His false claim that the European Union was formed to take advantage of the US
His false claim that tariffs were imposed merely after the Great Depression, not during it
His false claim that South Korea convinced former president Joe Biden to allow it to stop making any payments to share the cost of the US military presence there

Trump’s own past
Trump and the war in Iraq

Trump, touting his foreign policy acumen, has been falsely claiming for years that he publicly warned the US not to invade Iraq in 2003. He did it again in comments to reporters in June: “I said it loud and clear – but I was a civilian, but I guess I got a lot of publicity – but I was very much opposed to the Iraq war. And I actually did say, ‘Don’t go in, don’t go in, don’t go in.’ But I said, ‘If you’re going to go in, keep the oil.’ But they didn’t do that.”

Very firm quotes. Except Trump didn’t utter them.

There is no record of Trump issuing any such public warnings before the 2003 invasion. When radio host Howard Stern asked Trump in September 2002 whether he is “for invading Iraq,” Trump said, “Yeah, I guess so. I wish the first time it was done correctly.” Trump did not express a firm opinion about the war in a Fox interview in January 2003, saying that “either you attack or don’t attack” and that then-President George W. Bush “has either got to do something or not do something, perhaps.”

Trump started publicly expressing critical thoughts about the war shortly after it began in 2003, then emerged as an explicit opponent in 2004. He did get considerable publicity for this commentary – but it was post-invasion criticism, not the pre-invasion criticism he keeps saying it was.

Asked about this false claim, the White House official responded, “He said that he was against it.” In fact, though, Trump went further than simply claiming to have been against the invasion; he said he made specific pre-invasion public comments he didn’t make.

Trump’s uncle and the Unabomber

Trump has repeatedly invoked his late uncle John Trump, a longtime professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), as evidence of his own intelligence and good “genes.” At an event on energy and innovation earlier this month, he said he needed to “brag” about his uncle’s smarts, then made up a story that vividly but wrongly linked his uncle with the late “Unabomber” terrorist Theodore “Ted” Kaczynski.

“Kaczynski was one of his students,” Trump said, then went on to talk about having asked his uncle about what Kaczynski was like. “‘I said, ‘What kind of a student was he, Uncle John?’ Dr. John Trump. I said, ‘What kind of a student?’ And then he said, ‘Seriously, good.’ He said, ‘He’d correct – he’d go around correcting everybody.’”

This supposed exchange could not have happened. Aside from the fact that MIT says it has no information suggesting Kaczynski ever attended MIT (he went to nearby Harvard), the president’s uncle died in 1985, more than a decade before Kaczynski was publicly identified as the Unabomber in 1996. Given that Kaczynski had lived for years as a recluse in the wilderness, there is no apparent reason that Donald Trump would have been asking anyone about Kaczynski in 1985 or earlier.

The White House didn’t attempt to defend this story even on condition of anonymity.

Trump and civil unrest in Minneapolis

Trump, attacking a prominent Democratic opponent, told members of the military in a speech at Fort Bragg in June that “I’ll never forget” what happened with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis in 2020: “That city was burning down, Minneapolis – it was burning down, it was gonna burn to the ground – and he wouldn’t call the Guard. And I waited for a long time, and I called the Guard, and I saved it.”

Whatever Trump claims to recall, this is not what happened. In reality, Walz, not Trump, was the person who deployed the Minnesota National Guard, more than seven hours before Trump publicly threatened to deploy the Guard himself. While Walz was criticized by many Republicans and some Democrats for not sending in the Guard faster, it is indisputable that Walz, not Trump, was the person who eventually did it.

The White House official said Walz activated the Guard “only” after Trump urged him to. That’s an implicit concession that Trump was wrong when he said he was the one who activated the Guard – and the official’s statement is wrong too. Walz activated the Guard before he spoke with Trump on the matter and before Trump’s public statement.

Trump and damage to monuments

Trump told another dramatic but fake story about his response to 2020 protests during a speech in Iowa early this month.

Trump said that, while protesters were marching toward the Jefferson Memorial trying to rip down a statue of Thomas Jefferson, “we signed a law” – “an old bill from 1909” – that “said if you so much as touch a monument or a statue, you go to jail for a 10-year period. No anything.” He claimed that he held a news conference in the middle of the march saying anyone who touches a monument “immediately goes to jail for a 10-year period,” and then “that march broke up so quickly.”

“Do you remember that night? It was crazy,” Trump asked during his story.

Nobody could possibly remember that night because it didn’t occur. Trump did not sign any “law” on penalties for damage to monuments, he did not do anything to impose rapid or automatic 10-year jail sentences on people who damage monuments, and the policy he did announce in June 2020 did not suddenly break up an active march to the Jefferson Memorial.

What really happened: Trump announced that he had issued an executive order that directed the attorney general to prioritize investigations and prosecutions of people who damaged government-owned monuments and to prosecute offenders “to the fullest extent” allowed under existing federal law, which provided for a maximum – not immediate or mandatory – sentence of 10 years in prison. It’s not clear what impact, if any, this announcement had on the protests that followed Floyd’s murder.

Trump and Russia’s war on Ukraine

When a reporter reminded Trump at a press conference in June that Trump had previously promised to end Russia’s war on Ukraine in “24 hours” but had later said he had been speaking sarcastically, Trump said, “Of course it was sarcastic.”

It was plainly not sarcastic. When Trump claimed in April that he had made the promise “in jest,” CNN found 53 examples in which he had pledged on the campaign trail, in an entirely serious tone, manner and context, that he would end the war either within 24 hours of his return to the White House or even sooner than that, as president-elect.

When CNN asked the White House about this false claim, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly responded on the record with a comment that did not directly address its accuracy. “Russia and Ukraine are having direct talks for the first time in years because of President Trump’s leadership,” Kelly said.

https://us.cnn.com/2025/07/30/politics/ ... nald-trump

******

Their plan to eliminate unemployment
July 30, 9:12

Image

California gubernatorial candidate sparks Auschwitz scandal

The politician took a photo in front of the concentration camp gates and posted it online with the caption "My plan to eliminate unemployment."

A major scandal is brewing in Donald Trump's Republican Party. All because of the prank of a young candidate for the post of Governor of California, or rather, his photo on social networks. Kyle Langford took a photo against the backdrop of the gates of the infamous Nazi camp "Auschwitz" and commented on it "My plan to eliminate unemployment."

Not everyone appreciated such humor. The camp administration called it a deep moral decline.
In response to this, Langford said that his joke would have been liked by German ancestors.

https://ren.tv/news/v-mire/1354853-kand ... osventsime - zinc

Routinization of Nazism. From the Heart to the Sun.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9983083.html

Trump imposes 25% tariff on Indian goods
July 30, 16:54

Image

Trump has imposed 25% tariffs (plus an unclear "fine") on India for purchasing weapons and oil from Russia, as well as other resources. The tariffs will come into effect on August 1. For India, this is a test of sovereignty.

China has effectively sent the Americans away with their demands to refuse Russian oil. Attempts to impose secondary sanctions against China are likely to provoke retaliatory measures from China.

At the moment, the more the US tries to wave the sanctions baton, the more they will break the old economic order, pushing subject and relatively subject countries toward greater strategic autonomy and independence.

The alternative is to agree to a subordinate position, as the EU did.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9984107.html

Google Translator

******

Killing the Kennedy Center softly for the Reich?
Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence 30 Jul 2025

Image

With our own say so
How low can we go
On nazi limbo
To be WOKE no mo?

Woohoo! Birth Of A Nation screenings— sprinkled with heavy rotation of
Leni Riefenstahl and Kid Rock never grow old. Hot sounds of new house
Bands like The Grifters; and RICCO Rhythm Masters signal DEI’s done!
Cooked! Finished! No mas!

No more bobbing heads, tapping toes, hips swaying in seats. From now on
It’s McCain-ish crooning, “Bomb, bomb, bomb—Bomb, bomb Iran!” It’s
It’s Ku Klux Klan Karaoke Night— mic drops celebrating
2,000 lb. bombs on hospital incubators and their starving premie babies.

We hold the Kennedy Center’s keys. We control the
Horizontal. We control the vertical in this Twilight
Zone’s Wayback Machine. Where WOKE is broke; and
DEI has come to die; We Make Entertainment Great Again!

With our own say so
How low can we go
On nazi limbo
To be WOKE no mo?

We’ve de-DEI-ed US music—bleached Blues—jettisoned Jazz.
Replaced African roots and rhythms with red nose, big shoe shows.
Replaced woke-ness with reservation, plantation, concentration camp songs
In the key of vanilla ICE; War of The Week/School Shooting du Jour flavors.

The J6 Pardon-Neers just sold out. Remember their Capitalist Hill
Breakthrough performance? Some show! Heavy Metal beasts—
Killed with their triple platinum smash hit—
“Breaking And Entering!” We’re still picking up the pieces.

Promise: we’ll present only the heel-clicking best of the best.
52 weeks of the Waste Fraud and Abuse Band. And the return
Of ghoulish girl groups—like puppy-shooting— Botox Babes!
Funding’s fickle and faddish. But woke is broke; and DEI is dead.

© 2025. Raymond Nat Turner, The Town Crier. All Rights Reserved.

https://blackagendareport.com/index.php ... ftly-reich
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply