Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Jul 29, 2022 12:18 pm

Thinking in the future
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 07/29/2022

Image

The supply of Western weapons to the Ukrainian Army, which had already received training, financing and resources from its partners over the last eight years, has been one of the main issues on the political agenda of the European Union in recent months and from the United States. Five months after the start of the Russian intervention, large quantities of weapons continue to be shipped to Ukraine and used on the front lines amid Ukrainian demands for more shipments of ever heavier weapons. However, the interests and weapons readiness of the countries that are supplying these weapons are also important factors. The United States, the main source of weapons, has wanted to make it clear that, while it is willing to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian, It wants the conflict not to spread beyond the country's borders. Hence, for the moment, it guarantees a constant supply that makes it possible to continue the war in the long term, but refuses to supply the longer-range guided missiles requested by kyiv and with which it could attack, not only Crimea, thus causing an escalation without possible control, but targets in mainland Russia.

Original Article: Colonel Cassad

After a visit by US congressmen to kyiv, it has been claimed in Washington that the US should only supply 25-30 HIMARS (or similar foreign systems) to Ukraine. In other words, to the declared 20, 16 of which have already been officially delivered (according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, four have been destroyed and one was supposedly sold, although there are no images of it), a dozen more pieces should be added. .

It is important to understand that, in addition to issues stemming from the desire to intensify attacks on weapons depots and checkpoints of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, these supplies also hide another, more banal goal: replenishing the total fleet of multiple launch rocket systems. heavy, which the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have managed to limit by destroying a significant number of Uragan and other systems. In addition, due to the high intensity of their use, it is known that there is difficulty in getting enough ammunition for them. There is no problem in the case of Western MLRS, since even if a certain percentage is destroyed by Russian missiles, the supply can continue for a long time.

Unlike in Europe, the US stockpiles of missiles and shells are as large as those of the Russian Federation, so the US has prepared for a long war, since, from a resource point of view, it can be allow (not the European Union). The most important thing is that the Ukrainian cannon fodder continues to fertilize the fields on the left bank of the Dnieper and support the conflict to keep it at a level convenient for the United States, without freezing it, but without falling into a direct confrontation between the United States and Russia. . That is, in fact, the essence of the simple American strategy.

***

Just as important as the type of weapon shipped is also the type of ammunition for that loadout. For the time being, these shipments also support the strategy of keeping the conflict limited to Ukrainian territory, maximizing the damage that Ukraine can do to Russian troops and looking to the long term, a signal to Russia that its goal of demilitarizing the Ukrainian Army is going to face a constant supply of US weapons and ammunition that is not intended to be limited to the current war.

Original Article: Antifashist

Biden believes that Washington should not create the conditions that could lead to a third world war, said US national security adviser Jake Sullivan. The United States does not intend to supply Ukraine with ATACMS-series ballistic missiles for the M142 HIMARS. This was stated last Friday by the adviser to the president for National Security Jake Sullivan in his appearance at the annual security forum of the Aspen Institute in Colorado.

“There are certain types of weapons that the president is not willing to supply. One of them is long-range missiles (ATACMS), which have a range of 300 kilometers. From the president's point of view, while the primary goal of the United States is to do whatever is necessary to support and protect Ukraine, another key goal is to ensure that we do not find ourselves in a situation where we are headed for World War III. So the president has stated that he is willing to supply advanced ammunition for HIMARS systems, which are already being widely used, but he is not willing to send long-range missiles.”

Jake Sullivan insisted that the United States supplies Ukraine with weapons to meet the military objectives set by kyiv in addition to training Ukrainian troops in their use.

In addition, the United States has also denied information about the supply of combat aircraft to Ukraine. Washington only sends spare parts to Ukrainian aviation, according to the Pentagon spokesman. “We have sent Ukraine spare parts and other equipment so that it can effectively maintain its aircraft, so that they continue to fight (…). But we have not supplied US aircraft. We have focused on unmanned aerial vehicles,” he stated on Friday.

Earlier, John Kirby, coordinator of the communication strategy of the White House Security Council, had stated that the United States has begun to consider the possibility of supplying Ukraine with combat aircraft. The Defense Department representative was responding to a question about whether the administration is currently considering such a possibility even though he has stated in the past that it would worsen the situation. “Now, for the first time, we have the opportunity to look at the future of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in a broader way. Right now, we are still focused on the current battles. That is our main task. But we are talking about time and, in the end, about directing resources to also analyze the future capabilities of the [Ukrainian] forces,

"For current battles, it's not something we're considering right now," the official added, referring to combat aircraft. “States are working on broader discussions with Ukraine about their future needs for the Armed Forces and we are considering a wide range of assets, including aviation, to meet those future needs,” he explained. The Defense representative recalled that the United States will supply Ukraine with up to 580 Phoenix Ghost drones, the delivery of which will begin in August.

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/07/29/pensa ... more-25156

Google Translator

*************************

Russian Gas Embargo “Impossible,” Austrian Chancellor Says

Image
A common energy platform is at this time more important than ever to avoid competition between EU countries, Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer said. Jul. 28, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@Mousacisse1

According to the Austrian Chancellor, placing an embargo on Russian gas in the EU is out of the question as it poses a risk of industry collapse and unemployment.

Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer made the comments at a press conference with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban in Vienna.

A European Union (EU) embargo on Russian gas "is impossible not merely because Austria depends on Russian gas, the German industry also depends on it, and if it collapses, the Austrian one will crash down also; we will face mass unemployment," Nehammer said.

Given Russia's "resilience on account of its size and its capabilities," the sanctions already adopted do not act fast enough, the Austrian Chancellor said on the occasion in connection with the situation in Ukraine.

The official also criticized the EU's slow pace in setting up a joint mechanism for energy purchasing. A common energy platform is now more important than ever for preventing competition between EU countries, Nehammer said.


Faced with the possibility of supply disruptions this winter, EU member states agreed on Tuesday to a voluntary reduction of 15 percent in natural gas demand compared to the 2017-2021 average.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0021.html

PM: Hungary Won't Follow EU’s Gas Reduction Plan

Image
Hungarian PM says the country will not engage in the EU plan for reducing energy by 15 percent. Jul. 28, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@starck_jean

On Thursday, the Hungarian Prime Minister said its country would not abide by the plan on gas reduction proposed by the EU.

Viktor Orban, Hungarian Prime Minister, announced during his meeting with Austrian Chancellor Karl Nehammer in Vienna that Budapest will not follow the plan proposed by the EU regarding the reduction of gas consumption by 15 percent. The Prime Minister explained that Hungary determines its own energy policy.

Orban continued to say that all attempts by Brussels to interfere with this “will not find favor with the Hungarians.” The comments came in light of the announcement made by the European Council, earlier this week in anticipation of a cutoff in supply from Russia on the measures to reduce their gas demand by 15 percent until the winter.

Budapest was the only EU member state to oppose the voluntary plan, which could turn mandatory if the bloc declares a state of emergency. The Hungarian side said it was “simply impossible” to go without Russian energy. In addition, last Thursday, Hungary's Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto went on a business trip to Moscow to for negotiating the purchase of 700 million extra cubic meters of Russian gas.

“Our people don’t like that kind of thing,” said the Hungarian top official making an allusion to the EU proposal. "If Brussels has a say in what to do with our own energy, regardless of Brussels' good intentions or bad intentions, it will not find favor with the Hungarians.” He added that would make an effort to “convince Brussels to create a strategy that is good for the Ukrainians, the EU, and EU households.”


According to Orban, Brussel's implementation of energy reduction means that the continent is moving toward a “wartime economy.” He added that until peace is not reached, Ukraine "will not be able to solve any problems, there will be no energy, and the entire European Union will be pushed into an economic situation of war.”

Hungary's legislator said the current energy crisis could lead to the continent's recession and political instability.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/PM- ... -0018.html

Russia to Symmetrically Respond to Finland, Sweden, and NATO

Image
The former Russian President said that the country will reciprocally answer Sweden and Finland's moves. Jul. 28, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@Alexme22Alex

Published 28 July 2022 (11 hours 9 minutes ago)


The Russian government has again assured that it will respond symmetrically to NATO's military buildup in Finland and Sweden after they accede to the bloc.

"Our responses will be symmetrical to these steps...Russia's reaction to these events will be necessary and sufficient; I am sure that we will be able to protect our interests, protect the interests of our country, ensure its security, the security of our citizens with the necessary means," assured Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council.

The Russian representative said that Moscow is ready to cope with the military presence of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Finland and Sweden after the two countries accede to the bloc.

As for the possible provocations of these two NATO candidates, he made it clear that Finland and Sweden can choose different routes of advancement within the Alliance framework and decide to create bases on their territories and station offensive weapons.

According to the former Russian president, the accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO would only make the situation in the region more challenging "in terms of ensuring security for all." Moreover, Medvedev said that, in his opinion, such a measure would deteriorate security in the Baltic region and turn it into a "sea dominated by NATO."


In this regard, he emphasized that the accession of these countries will also affect their diplomatic relations with Moscow. "Relations with neutral Sweden will also be reviewed," he said.

In the meantime, at the end of last June, NATO formally invited Sweden and Finland to join the military alliance, which was confirmed by a statement issued by NATO heads of state and government.

At the same time, the Kremlin warns Finland and Sweden that joining NATO will not strengthen their security and calls the decision "another serious mistake that will have far-reaching consequences."

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0022.html

**********************

Ukrainian attack leaves 40 prisoners dead in Donetsk

Image
The kyiv government has not yet ruled on the consequences of its counteroffensive in Yelenovka prison. | Photo: Reuters
Published July 29, 2022 (1 hour 4 minutes ago)

According to the Donetsk authorities, the attack on a prison in Yelénovka left more than 100 injured.

The deputy minister of information of the self-proclaimed People's Republic of Donetsk, Daniíl Bezsónov, denounced this Friday the death of 40 Ukrainian soldiers during the bombardment by kyiv forces of a prison in Yelenovka, in the Donbas region.

“At night, the Ukrainian military attacked, presumably with HIMARS (US-made multiple rocket launchers), the Yelénovka prison. It hit directly on the prisoner barracks. The balance so far: 40 dead and 130 injured, ”Bezsónov stated in his Telegram account.

Bezsonov has insisted that these are preliminary figures, since "they are still cleaning up the rubble and the figures may increase."


The kyiv government has not yet ruled on the consequences of its counteroffensive in the Yelenovka prison, where hundreds of military personnel from its own country, imprisoned during the conflict, were held.

Meanwhile, the head of the Donetsk Regional Military Administration on the Ukrainian side, Pavlo Kirilenko, accused Russia of the deaths of eight civilians in Bakhmut, Toretsk, Orlivka, Hirnik and Soledar, and of 19 other injuries.

"At the moment it is impossible to fix the exact number of victims in Mariupol and Volnovakha," he stressed.

"All Russians will be held accountable for their crimes on our land," Kirilenko threatened on Telegram.


Since last February 24, the war in Ukraine has caused severe material damage, thousands of deaths and millions of displaced people, according to the United Nations (UN).

A few days before the outbreak of war, Russia had recognized the proclamation of independence of the republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, in the Donbas region, where fighting had been going on since 2014.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/fuerzas- ... -0008.html

Google Translator

*************************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

forwarded from
Readovka
Map of hostilities and the situation on the fronts on the evening of July 28

⚔️The situation on the fronts for the past day:

▫️In the Slavic direction , there are battles for Bakhmutskoye , as well as on the outskirts of Soledar .

▫️On the Artemovsky (Bakhmutovsky) direction, the Russian army completely cleared the village of Vershina , which is located southeast of Bakhmut (Artemovsk) . Heavy fighting continues near Merry Valley .

▫️In the Donetsk direction, it was possible to break through the defense of the Ukrainian armed formations between Peski and Krasnohorivka . It is reported about the assault on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the village of Marinka , as well as the capture of Avdeeka in “pincers” . The Ugledar direction is still on an operational pause.

▫️It’s not boring at the border in the Bryansk , Belgorod , Kursk regions - strike UAVs, artillery and mortars are working.

🚀"Arrivals". The Donetsk and Lugansk agglomerations are suffering again . In particular, shells from the Armed Forces of Ukraine again flew into the Kuibyshevsky district of Donetsk.

🎯Rocket strikes by our VKS were carried out at warehouses with weapons and ammunition in Nikolaev , in the regions of Kirovograd , Zaporozhye , Bakhmut (Artemovsk) and the Kharkov agglomeration. Operational tasks were also solved during the destruction of targets in the Kiev and Chernihiv regions.

Image

***

Сolonelcassad
❗️🇬🇧🇺🇦 Offensive on Donbass: the situation in the east of Ukraine
by the end of July 28, 2022

▪️This morning , air defense went off over the village of Novosadovoe in the suburbs of Belgorod . There is no damage or casualties among the civilian population.

▪️In the morning hours, the RF Armed Forces launched massive missile strikes on the training point of the 57th OMB and 55th OBR of the Ukrainian army in the village of Goncharovskoye , Chernihiv region. In addition, Russian artillery hit the enemy positions in Tolstodubovo and Ryasnoye in the Sumy region.

▪️There are no significant changes on the front line in the Kharkiv region . Positional battles and artillery duels continue along the entire line of contact. At night, Russian troops inflicted fire damage on the objects of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Kharkov , Chuguev and other cities in the region.

▪️In the Donbass over the past day, the main events unfolded in the A -Vdeevsky direction . In the vicinity of Bakhmut (Artemovsk) , the parties are preparing for a further offensive of the allied forces.
➖Near Kramatorsk , Russian aviation destroyed an S-300 air defense missile launcher .
➖After the capture of the Novolugansk and Uglegorsk thermal power plants , the allied forces are preparing for a further offensive. Reports about the establishment of control of the RF Armed Forces over the village of Vershina were not confirmed.
➖During a recent retreat from Pokrovsky , Ukrainian servicemen from the 58th brigade came under fire from the 118th brigade of the terrorist defense, occupying defensive positions in the vicinity of Bakhmutsky .
➖The allied forces, having occupied the shaft of the Shchurovka mine, advanced to the strategically important waste heap in Maryinka . The occupation of the height and the fortified area of ​​the Armed Forces of Ukraine will allow the release of the entire settlement.
➖Russian artillery and missile formations, with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, are continuously working on enemy fortifications in Avdiivka .
➖The Ukrainian formations, in addition to shelling the cities of the Donetsk agglomeration , which have become regular , have begun remote mining of cities with mines - "petals" from the Uragan MLRS. The victims of these subtle and dangerous shells are, as a rule, civilians of Donbass.

▪️In the Zaporozhye direction, Ukrainian formations dropped an explosive device from a UAV in the morning on the village of Sosnovy Bor near Energodar , no one was injured.

The RF Armed Forces, in turn, inflicted fire damage on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Stepnogorsk , Kamenskoye and Maly Shcherbak .

▪️In the Krivoy Rog direction, the parties continue to prepare for further hostilities. In the Topolinoye VKS area, Russia struck a large concentration of enemy manpower, among them a large number of 200s and 300s.

Image

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*****************

Shelling colonies in Elenovke
July 29, 10:24 am

Image

At night, HIMARS MLRS fired at the colony in Yelenovka, where Ukrainian prisoners of war are kept. In particular, Nazis who had surrendered from Azovstal were taken there for detention - the healthy ones were taken to Yelenovka, and the wounded and crippled (some of whom were later changed) - to Novoazovsk.
As of morning, at least 40 people were killed and another 140 were injured as a result of falling into the barracks with prisoners of war. Debris clearance continues, so the number of victims may increase.
Ukraine continues to break new depths of the bottom.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7766626.html

Extraction from Zelensky in Yelenovka
July 29, 11:48

Image

Footage from the colony in Yelenovka, where 47 Ukrainian prisoners of war were killed by a missile attack by the Armed Forces of Ukraine tonight.
As the Russian Defense Ministry clarified, 75 more prisoners of war and 8 employees of the colony were also injured. Debris clearing and casualty counting continues.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7767062.html

(Video at link, Russian)

Google Translator

**************************

A Panicking Biden Administration Seeks Talks With Russia

Here is another story that demonstrates the incompetence and arrogance of the Biden administration.

The New York Times reports of a potential prisoner swap between the U.S. and Russia:

[T]he Biden administration has proposed trading the merchant of death for the imprisoned basketball player as well as a former marine held in Russia on what are considered trumped-up espionage charges. In the harsh and cynical world of international diplomacy, prisoner exchanges are rarely pretty, but unpalatable choices are often the only choices on the table.
Whether the swap would go through remained unclear. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken made the offer public in part to reassure the families of Brittney Griner, the basketball player, and Paul N. Whelan, the former marine, that the administration is doing all it can to free them.

Russian officials, who have long sought the release of the arms trafficker Viktor Bout, confirmed the discussion on Thursday but said Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov was too busy to talk with Mr. Blinken now.


Typically prisoner swaps are not talked about publicly before they happen:

Some veteran hostage negotiators were perplexed that Mr. Blinken made the offer public. “It is baffling why the U.S. would announce this proposal in the midst of the negotiations,” said Rob Saale, the former head of the F.B.I.-led Hostage Recovery Fusion Cell. “If you’re in sensitive negotiations why would you want to air this out publicly? It makes me wonder if the Russians haven’t already declined the deal.”

Mr. Saale suspicion was justified as the Washington Post now reports:

The Biden administration disclosed publicly that the United States had made “a substantial offer” to Russia to secure the release of two American prisoners because closed-door negotiations had stalled, an administration official said Thursday.

The administration hopes public pressure will lead Moscow to engage in negotiations resulting in basketball star Brittney Griner and security consultant Paul Whelan being released from Russian prison, the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive deliberations.

U.S. officials say they have tried for weeks to broker the releases of Griner and Whelan. But the lack of progress, and the prospect of Griner soon facing conviction and sentencing on drug charges, prompted the administration this week to make the negotiations public.


I do not understand why the administration had started such negotiations even before the Griner court case has been closed. In general such prisoners will only be pardoned and released to the other side after they have been sentenced. Anything else would raise accusations of executive interference in the judicial process. The Brittney Griner case, over admitted smuggling of cannabis oil, is still in court. The Russian government will obviously refrain from doing anything about her before the judicial process has ended.

One suspects that the prisoner exchange is much more about Paul Whelan, who likely is a CIA asset. He had passports from four countries and in 2007 started traveling to Moscow while serving as a Marine in Iraq:

Whelan went on to seek out more Russian friends, using the country's social networking service VK among others.
A scroll through their profiles, soon after his arrest, revealed almost all to be men - most considerably younger than him. Some do have clear military connections - including photographs in uniform - though not all, and no-one who replied to my messages had seen any reason to doubt Whelan's motives.
...
The man Whelan accuses of framing him was one of his oldest friends in Russia. He is also a serving intelligence officer.

Defence lawyers disclosed some details of the men's relationship early on in the case, including how the American had visited his friend's house in Sergiev Posad outside Moscow for "saunas and kebabs" the winter before his arrest.

They also said he owed Whelan around 80,000 roubles ($1,147; £930) which the FSB claimed was advance payment for intelligence. The defence team said the Russian had requested a loan to buy a gift for his wife, as part of his trap.


The Russian side says that they found a USB stick in Whelan's pocket with a list of FSB members which had been handed to him by his bribed friend.

It may well be that Whelan was trapped by the FSB. But that does not exclude that he also was a spy. His documented behavior surely raises that suspicion:

On December 28, 2018, Whelan was arrested in the Moscow area by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), which later confirmed his arrest. Whelan's twin brother David said Whelan arrived in Moscow on December 22 to attend the wedding of a former fellow Marine at the Hotel Metropol Moscow and to assist the groom's family members on their first visit to Russia, a country he had visited many times. He said his brother planned to return to Michigan on January 6, 2019, via Saint Petersburg.
Per MBK News, an outlet run by Putin critic Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Whelan had $80,000 in cash "temporarily confiscated" during a customs inspection at Domodedovo Airport. According to the New York Times, Whelan had acted as a local guide for the wedding guests, but had decided to spend the day of the wedding to meet a friend, per the account of other attendees.


Why is the Biden administration now racing to get a prisoner exchange? Why is it publishing that it is doing so? I really see no good reason for that.

There are of course, as M.K. Bhadrakumar notes, other important reasons why Blinken wants to talk with Russia:

Blinken then came to the real purpose of his forthcoming call with Lavrov — “the plans that Russia now has to pursue the annexation of Ukrainian territory.”
Blinken repeated the hyperbole that sanctions are having “a powerful and also growing effect” and has “weakened Russia profoundly” and the Biden administration will do all that it can “to strengthen Ukraine’s position on the battlefield so it has the strongest possible position at the negotiating table.”

However, what comes through is the growing disquiet in Washington that to its utter disbelief, the Russian stance has only hardened lately. Blinken said it is “causing alarms.” In particular, he noted Lavrov’s remark last week that the Kremlin’s goals in Ukraine had expanded. “Now they seek to claim more Ukrainian territory, beyond the Donbas,” he commented.

Indeed, the war has spun out of US algorithm. As Hungarian PM Orban pointed out last week, anti-Russian sanctions “have not shaken Moscow,” but Europe has already lost four governments and is in an economic and political crisis.

Russia is paying back to the US and NATO in the same coin that the latter did when they dismembered Yugoslavia.


The U.S. sees that its proxy war against Russia is not going into the hoped for direction:

The spectre of the collapse of EU economies is rattling the Biden Administration. A CNN report yesterday was titled US officials say ‘biggest fear’ has come true as Russia cuts gas supplies to Europe. It said the Biden administration “is working furiously behind the scenes to keep European allies united” as the blowback from the sanctions against Russia hits them and the “impact on Europe could boomerang back onto the US, spiking natural gas and electricity prices.”

The report quoted an unnamed US official saying Russia’s retaliation for western sanctions has put the West in “unchartered territory.” Suffice to say, Blinken’s call underscores the desperate urgency in Washington to open a line of communication to Moscow at the political level.

It was obvious that the Russian side would use the publishing of the potential prisoner exchange to its advantage:

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters Thursday that diplomatic silence typically surrounds negotiations regarding prisoner releases. Announcements are usually made “about agreements that have been completed,” Peskov said, and no agreements have been finalized.
The Russian government acknowledged Thursday that it had received Blinken’s request, but the media service Interfax reported that Lavrov would respond “when his own schedule allows.”

“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will pay attention to this request as soon as time allows,” ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said, according to Interfax. “Currently, his schedule of international contacts is packed full of real affairs: the SCO [Shanghai Cooperation Organization] council of foreign ministers in Tashkent, bilateral meetings.”


Yes, the foreign minister of 'isolated Russia', who was recently friendly received in several African countries, is very busy with meeting dozens of foreign dignitaries. He has no time for a call with some U.S. minion known for making unfounded accusations and unreasonable requests.

The Russian's will let Blinken squirm for a while over the unimportant prisoner affair and other issues.

The delusion reflected in the Washington Post write up shows that the U.S. has yet to come to its senses:

Lavrov on Wednesday concluded a four-day trip to Africa and is now in Uzbekistan, part of a flurry of recent diplomatic visits, as Russia seeks to bolster its remaining partnerships amid deepening international isolation over its war in Ukraine.

How please is the alleged international isolation of Russia 'deepening`? After the first flurry of sanctions, solely by NATO, EU and 5-eyes countries, no other country has joined the 'western' Russia bashing or put up sanctions. Russia's international standing with the other 80+% of humanity has in fact increased ever since.

The Washington Post writer, as well as the whole Biden administration, has some serious delusions about Russia's role in the now multipolar world.

Lavrov, Peskov and Maria Zakharova are experienced professionals. If one wants to talk with them one should be on a similar level.

Blinken does not even come near to that.

Posted by b on July 29, 2022 at 9:57 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/07/a ... .html#more

********************

Russian Ops in Ukraine (July 28, 2022): Ukraine’s “Kherson Offensive,” Battle in the Donbass
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 28, 2022



Update on Russia operations in Ukraine for July 28, 2022

– US continues sending weapons to Ukraine but in diminished numbers;

– Pentagon overstates impact of HIMARS, omits Russian gains in Donbass;

– Washington DC-based think tank admits Russia is still making gains;

– Best case scenario for Ukraine’s “Kherson Offensive” falls far short of “victory;”

References:

Defense Politics Asia – Ukraine Map: https://defensepoliticsasia.com/ukraine/

Live UA Map: https://liveuamap.com/ US Department of Defense – Senior Defense Official Holds a Background Briefing JULY 22, 2022: https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcri

Washington Post – Ukraine is running out of ammunition as prospects dim on the battlefield: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/

Institute for the Study of War (ISW) – Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, July 27: https://www.understandingwar.org/back

AP – In Ukraine war, a race to acquire smarter, deadlier drones: https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukr

Ukrainian National Resistance Center – THE RUSSIANS BRING HEALTHCARE WORKERS TO LUHANSK REGION DUE TO THE REFUSAL OF THE LOCALS TO COOPERATE WITH THEM: https://sprotyv.mod.gov.ua/en/2022/07

BBC – Kherson: Ukraine stepping up counter offensive to retake city – sources: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe

VOA – Russia Captures Power Plant in Southern Ukraine: https://www.voanews.com/a/russia-capt

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... e-donbass/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat Jul 30, 2022 12:18 pm

An attack on Elenovka prison
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 07/30/2022 ⋅ LEAVE A COMMENT

Image

Early yesterday morning, the DPR reported an attack on the prison in the town of Elenovka, south of Donetsk. The attack was said to have been carried out with US HIMARS and a preliminary figure was given of 40 dead and dozens wounded, including eight prison employees. The injured, some of them in critical condition, were taken to hospitals in Donetsk. Throughout the morning, the death toll rose to 53 and the number of injured to 71, preliminary data that will undoubtedly increase taking into account the conditions in which both the attacked place and some of the bodies were found. The first images distributed by the Russian press and Donetsk reporters on the ground showed clear impacts on the roof of a large room with long rows of bunk beds burned and in which human remains were clearly visible. The accuracy of the hit rules out the possibility of an accidental attack. The attack took place at night, while the prisoners were sleeping. Hours later,RIA Novosti and other Russian media showed the remains of the recovered projectile. The DPR continues to maintain that these are HIMARS supplied by the United States.

As expected, the exchange of accusations was not long in coming. The command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine issued a statement denying responsibility and stating that its artillery had not worked in that area of ​​the front. Ukraine obviously accuses Russia of bombing a city that is under DPR control. In its statement, the Ukrainian Armed Forces used as evidence against Russia that no prison employee had been injured, despite the fact that, from the outset, the DPR mentioned eight workers.

But even before the official accusation, leading members of the Azov regiment and its political wing, the National Corpus, took Russia's guilt for granted and announced revenge. Russia had not been able to defeat Azov at the front, so he had finished off the soldiers with vile murder. That was the version given by the movement's first commander and still spiritual leader, Andriy Biletsky, who, on his Telegram channel, claimed to speak on behalf of Azov in his announcement of the start of "the hunt for all those involved in this mass murder." ”. Before, Maksym Zhorin, third commander of the Azov regiment, and now one of the main people in charge of the reorganization of the Azov units after the fall of Mariupol, had already accused Russia of the events. “My personal opinion (not the official version) is that the sick Russian bastards did it. They have blown up the barracks with our prisoners. There is no reason or logic behind it: they are just fucking animals," he wrote on his Telegram channel, in which he continues to introduce himself as "Maksym of Azov" despite the fact that since 2017 he left the command of the regiment to move to the structure National Corpus policy. The separation that the Western press has wanted to see between the Azov regiment and Andriy Biletsky's political party simply does not exist.

He went to the Elenovka prison where, after the surrender of May 20, the DPR transferred a part of the prisoners of war from the Azovstal factory in Mariupol, who there joined those captured weeks before in the Ilyich factory in the city. from the south of the Republic. Among those prisoners transferred there were also members of the Azov regiment, although not its commander, Denis Prokopenko, Redis , separated from the rest of the prisoners from the moment of surrender and who, according to Russian and Western sources, was transferred to Russian territory.

The state of many of the bodies, although not all, is going to make it considerably difficult, not only to count the victims, but also to identify them. However, without further information, Andriy Biletsky assumed not only Russia's guilt, but that the attack was directed at the Azov regiment. According to the leader of the Azov movement, who in his speech combines allegations of lack of contact with the prisoners and absolute knowledge of the situation in the place, the attack was premeditated and the members of Azov were separated from the rest hours before to be later killed. From the DPR, it is stated that Azov prisoners were always kept separate from those of other units.

Without the possibility of an investigation into what happened and with the war propaganda installed in the media camouflaged as information, it would be a chimera to hope that the circumstances of the attack and its motivation would be known. While the DPR claims, speculating that Ukraine wanted to silence the prisoners, who were collaborating with the Republic authorities, that the attack was premeditated, the Ukrainian authorities have wasted no time denouncing a Russian war crime. Early in the morning, Oleksiy Arestovich, always quick to jump to conclusions, claimed that, according to the local population, it was the Russian Grads who had attacked the prison. As on many other occasions, Russia was accused of bombing a city under the firm control of the DPR and that is far from the places that are currently the focus of the Russian and Republican offensive such as Peski and Avdeevka. However, hours later, Arestovich alleged that, according to "experts", the state of the bodies showed that the fire occurred when the victims had already died, which is why he pointed to an even more incredible version than the self-bombing: Russia would have killed the soldiers first and would have burned down the prison, a necessary infrastructure considering the high number of prisoners of war it has to accommodate in the limited resources available to it.

Ukraine's performance is not new. Since the beginning of the war, even in cases as clear as the attack on the Gorlovka center that killed twenty people who were walking through a central park on a Sunday morning, accusing Russia and the DPR of bombing their cities to delegitimize the Ukrainian Army has been the official line of kyiv. That discourse has not changed since the beginning of the Russian military intervention. In the first weeks of the war, the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs used the image of a Ukrainian bombardment against the city of Donetsk, which caused more than twenty deaths in the heart of the city, to blame Russia for the attack.

The Heroes of Azovstal , the soldiers who were besieged in the factory owned by Rinat Akhmetov for weeks before surrendering to DPR forces, have been made heroes not only nationally but also internationally. Just this week, The New York Times promoted his documentary about the defenders of Azovstal-actually, it was Azovstal who defended the soldiers and not the other way around- comparing the battle, which he describes as legendary, to the Alamo. Installed in the collective conscience that every Russian message is likely to be false while the Ukrainian claims are to be taken as facts that do not need to be verified, it is likely that the death of dozens of them in the Elenovka prison will be used to further amplify more a manufactured legend and that does not correspond to a heroic performance. With the battle lost and Mariupol under siege, Russian authorities offered Ukrainian soldiers a safe corridor to leave the city. Their political authorities gave the order to fight to the end that, with no chance or attempt to rescue the soldiers, could only be death or surrender.

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/07/30/un-at ... more-25164

Google Translator

*************************************

Lavrov Urges Blinken To Avoid Leaks Regarding Prisoner Exchange

Image
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov | Photo: Russian Foreign Ministry

Published 29 July 2022 (16 hours 5 minutes ago)

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, in a telephone conversation he held Friday with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, urged to resort to diplomacy without speculations and leaks when discussing the exchange of prisoners between Moscow and Washington, the Russian Foreign Ministry reported.

"Referring to the possible exchange of imprisoned citizens of Russia, the Russian side urges the United States to return to the professional mode, to the dialogue of 'calm diplomacy,' without speculations and leaks of information," the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

On Wednesday, Blinken indicated that Washington offered Moscow to exchange Russia's Viktor Bout to facilitate the release of Americans Paul Whelan, sentenced to 16 years for espionage, and Brittney Griner, accused of drug smuggling.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova confirmed that negotiations on the prisoner exchange between Russia and the United States are underway, but no concrete result has yet been reached.

Bout was arrested in Thailand in 2008 as part of a US security services operation and extradited to the US in 2010.

The US justice system sentenced him to 25 years in prison for allegedly conspiring to kill US citizens by agreeing to supply weapons to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a guerrilla organization that recently abandoned the armed struggle but which is listed by the White House as a terrorist organization.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Lav ... -0011.html

**********************

Image

Sanctions had no effect on Moscow yet Europe lost 4 governments: Orban
Originally published: Al Mayadeen on July 23, 2022 by Agencies (more by Al Mayadeen) | (Posted Jul 29, 2022)

Russia sanctions have not shaken Moscow’s resolve, despite the fact that Europe has already lost four governments due to economic and political crises, according to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Saturday.

“The West’s strategy is like a car with flat tires on all four wheels… The sanctions did not destabilize Moscow. Europe is in trouble, economically and politically, and four governments have become victims: UK, Bulgarian, Italian, and Estonian… People will face a sharp increase in prices. And the better part of the world deliberately did not support us as well — China, India, Brazil, South Africa, the Arab world, Africa — everybody is aloof from this conflict, they are interested in their own affairs,” Orban said while delivering a speech in the Romanian city of Baile Tusnad.

Orban went on to say that the Ukrainian conflict will “put an end to Western hegemony, which could unite the world against someone,” and that a “multipolar global order” will “knock on the door.”

On a trip to Moscow today, Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto told reporters that the EU should be truthful about the realities of the gas supply from Russia rather than treating it as an ideological matter.

“It has been proven that the purchase of natural gas is not an ideological issue, but a physical issue that can’t be solved by talking,” Szijjarto said.

The EU has been urging member states to decrease dependence on Russian gas as a response to Moscow’s military operation in Ukraine.

Euro hits its lowest, Ruble hits 2-year high
As shown by trading data, the Euro fell below $1.03 for the first time in July since December 2002. The euro traded at $1.0296 which is down from $1.0421 at a time when the dollar index was 1.04% to 106.23 points.

Fears over the European energy crisis are putting pressure on the euro. Strike-related production suspensions at many fields by Norway’s Equinor increased gas prices. Nord Stream will be suspended for scheduled maintenance from July 11 to July 21. In light of this, European gas futures are rising by 6% to almost $1,800 per thousand cubic meters.

On the other hand, the exchange rate of the dollar and the euro fell against the ruble in May and the currency was trading below 69 rubles for the first time since June 2020, while the euro was trading below 73 rubles.

In terms of stock trading, the Moscow Stock Exchange denominated in rubles (MICEX) index declined by 0.02% to 2444.67 points, while the stock exchange index denominated in dollars (RTS) rose 0.87% to 1091 points.

Moscow trade

Western sanctions didn’t stop Russia from increasing trade with friendly states.

The Russian foreign ministry revealed in April that it expects commodity flows with China to grow and trade with Beijing to reach $200 billion by 2024, according to the Interfax news agency, given that the West-led sanctions on Russia have driven Moscow to shift its economic ties and cooperation toward the East.

The ministry contended that Chinese companies must be cautious of the risks of subjection to secondary sanctions – however, Beijing is ready to expand cooperation with Moscow nonetheless.

Moreover, last month, Russian President Vladimir Putin stressed that Moscow and Tehran’s relations are strategic and deep in nature, pointing to the growth of trade between the Russia and Iran last year and in the first months of 2022.

On his part, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi pointed out that the Russian-Iranian trade relations are developing, stressing that nothing will stand in their way.

Raisi said the agreements that the two countries have reached are under implementation, highlighting that the cooperation between Russia and Iran in the Caspian Sea region is an important aspect of bilateral cooperation.

https://mronline.org/2022/07/29/sanctio ... nts-orban/

**********************

All That I Ask Is That You Fight for Peace Today: The Thirtieth Newsletter (2022)

JULY 28, 2022

Image
Fuyuko Matsui (Japan), Becoming Friends with All the Children of the World, 2004.


Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

The fragility of Europe’s energy supply has once again been on display in recent months. Gas shipments through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, which runs from Russia to Germany, were reduced to 40% of capacity in June, a cut that Moscow said was due to delays in the servicing of a turbine by the German firm Siemens. Shortly thereafter, on 11 July, the pipeline was taken offline for ten days for annual routine maintenance. Despite receiving assurances from Moscow that the supply would resume as scheduled, European leaders expressed fears that the shutdown would continue indefinitely in retaliation for sanctions imposed on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine. On 21 July, the flow of Russian gas into Europe resumed. Klaus Müller, the head of Germany’s energy regulator, said that gas flows through Nord Stream 1 were below pre-maintenance levels during the first few hours of resumption, though they have now returned to 40% capacity.

European anxieties related to energy supply are linked to fears amongst the region’s governments of further instability in the Eurozone. On the same day that Nord Stream 1 resumed operations, Italy’s Mario Draghi resigned as prime minister, the latest in a dramatic series of resignations by heads of government in Bulgaria, Estonia, and the United Kingdom. Resistance from Europe to a peace agreement with Russia comes alongside recognition that trade with Russia is inevitable.

At No Cold War, an international platform seeking to bring sanity to international relations, we have been closely observing the shifting tenor of the war in Ukraine and the US-driven pressure campaign against China. We have published three previous briefings from this platform in our newsletters; below, you will find briefing no. 4, The World Does Not Want a Global NATO, which details the emerging clarity in the Global South regarding the US-European attempt to drive a belligerent agenda around the world. This new clarity relates not only to the militarisation of the planet, but also to the deepening conflicts in trade and development, as evidenced by the G7’s new initiative, the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Development, which clearly targets China’s Belt and Road Initiative.


Image

In June, member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) gathered in Madrid, Spain for their annual summit. At the meeting, NATO adopted a new Strategic Concept, which had last been updated in 2010. In it, NATO names Russia as its ‘most significant and direct threat’ and singled out China as a ‘challenge [to] our interests’. In the words of NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, this guiding document represents a ‘fundamental shift’ for the military alliance, its ‘biggest overhaul… since the Cold War’.



A Monroe Doctrine for the 21st Century?

Although NATO purports to be a ‘defensive’ alliance, this claim is contradicted by its destructive legacy – such as in Serbia (1999), Afghanistan (2001), and Libya (2011) – and its ever-expanding global footprint. At the summit, NATO made it clear that it intends to continue its global expansion to confront Russia and China. Seemingly oblivious to the immense human suffering produced by the war in Ukraine, NATO declared that its ‘enlargement has been a historic success… and contributed to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area’, and extended official membership invitations to Finland and Sweden.

However, NATO’s sights extend far beyond the ‘Euro-Atlantic’ to the Global South. Seeking to gain a foothold in Asia, NATO welcomed Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand as summit participants for the first time and stated that ‘the Indo-Pacific is important for NATO’. On top of this, echoing the Monroe Doctrine (1823) of two hundred years ago, the Strategic Concept named ‘Africa and the Middle East’ as ‘NATO’s southern neighbourhood’, and Stoltenberg made an ominous reference to ‘Russia and China’s increasing influence in [the Alliance’s] southern neighbourhood’ as presenting a ‘challenge’.

Image
Pavel Pepperstein (Russia), Grandfather and Grandmother Are Long Gone, 2013.



85% of the World Seeks Peace

Although NATO’s member states may believe that they possess global authority, the overwhelming majority of the world does not. The international response to the war in Ukraine indicates that a stark divide exists between the United States and its closest allies on the one hand and the Global South on the other.

Governments representing 6.7 billion people – 85% of the world’s population – have refused to follow sanctions imposed by the US and its allies against Russia, while countries representing only 15% of the world’s population have followed these measures. According to Reuters, the only non-Western governments to have enacted sanctions on Russia are Japan, South Korea, the Bahamas, and Taiwan – all of which host US military bases or personnel.

There is even less support for the push to close airspace to Russian planes spearheaded by the US and European Union. Governments representing only 12% of the world’s population have adopted this policy, while 88% have not.

US-led efforts to politically isolate Russia on the international stage have been unsuccessful. In March, the UN General Assembly voted on a nonbinding resolution to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: 141 countries voted in favour, 5 countries voted against, 35 countries abstained, and 12 countries were absent. However, this tally does not tell the full story. The countries which either voted against the resolution, abstained, or were absent represent 59% of the world’s population. Following this, the Biden administration’s call for Russia to be excluded from the G20 summit in Indonesia was ignored.

Image
Tadesse Mesfin (Ethiopia), Pillars of Life: Harmony, 2018.



Meanwhile, despite intense backing from NATO, efforts to win support for Ukraine in the Global South have been a complete failure. On 20 June, after several requests, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky addressed the African Union; only two heads of state of the continental organisation’s 55 members attended the meeting. Shortly thereafter, Zelensky’s request to address the Latin American trade bloc, Mercosur, was rejected.

It is clear that NATO’s claim to be ‘a bulwark of the rules-based international order’ is not a view which is shared by most of the world. Support for the military alliance’s policies is almost entirely confined to its member countries and a handful of allies which together constitute a small minority of the world’s population. Most of the world’s population rejects NATO’s policies and global aspirations and does not wish to divide the international community into outdated Cold War blocs.

Image
Bahadır Gökay (Turkey) Evvel (‘Before’), 2013.


In 1955, ten years after the US dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima (Japan), the Turkish poet Nâzim Hikmet wrote a poem in the voice of a seven-year-old girl who died in that terrible act. The poem was later translated into Japanese by Nobuyuki Nakamoto as ‘Shinda Onnanoko’ (‘Dead Girl’) and frequently sung in commemorations of that atrocity. Given the harshness of war and the escalation of conflict, it is worthwhile to reflect once more on Hikmet’s beautiful, haunting lyrics:

I come and stand at every door
But no one hears my silent tread.
I knock and yet remain unseen
For I am dead, for I am dead.

I’m only seven, although I died
In Hiroshima long ago.
I’m seven now as I was then.
When children die, they do not grow.

My hair was scorched by swirling flame.
My eyes grew dim; my eyes grew blind.
Death came and turned my bones to dust
And that was scattered by the wind.

I need no fruit, I need no rice.
I need no sweets, nor even bread.
I ask for nothing for myself
For I am dead, for I am dead.

All that I ask is that for peace
You fight today, you fight today
So that the children of the world
May live and grow and laugh and play.


Warmly,

Vijay

https://thetricontinental.org/newslette ... obal-nato/

****************************

Russia’s New Satellite-Blinding Lasers to Disrupt NATO Surveillance
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 28, 2022
Drago Bosnic

Image

Space has been a war-fighting domain for over half a century now. Although largely non-kinetic, space warfare is slowly transitioning to a more traditional one, with competitors now fielding capabilities to directly target hostile space-based systems. Russia, one of the world leaders in this field, is building a new ground-based laser weapon for disrupting enemy satellites orbiting overhead.mA report by The Space Review states that the Russian military’s intention is to dazzle sensors on ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) satellites belonging to NATO and other hostile nations.

The Russian military will soon be able to protect much of the Eurasian giant’s landmass from the prying eyes of the political West and its numerous vassals. There is still scant information on the new directed energy weapon, but military experts believe it will be able to permanently disable electro-optical sensors used by satellites to track ground-based units and facilities. If true, this would render the satellite completely useless, which is of particular importance for the Russian military, which has been facing NATO ISR capabilities for over 5 months now.

Gas lasers pump large amounts of energy into specific molecules such as carbon dioxide. Chemical lasers are powered by specific chemical reactions that release energy. Solid-state lasers use customized crystalline materials to convert electrical energy into photons. In all lasers, the photons are subsequently amplified by passing them through a special type of material called the gain medium and then focused into a coherent beam by a beam director.

Depending on the photon intensity and wavelength, the directed beam of energy formed by a laser can create a range of effects at its target. For example, if the photons are in the visible part of the spectrum, a laser can deliver light at its target. For a sufficiently high flow of high-energy photons, a laser can heat, vaporize, melt and even burn through the material of its target. The ability to deliver these effects is determined by the power level of the laser, the distance between the laser and its target, and the ability to focus the beam on the target.

The new Russian laser weapon is known as Kalina. It’s purpose is to dazzle, or in simpler words, blind the electro-optical sensors of ISR satellites. The process involves saturating the sensors with enough light to prevent them from functioning properly or at all. Achieving this requires high-precision delivery of sufficient amount of amplified light beams to the targeted satellite sensor. This is no easy feat given the extreme distances and the fact that the laser beam must first pass through the Earth’s atmosphere.

Kalina operates in a pulsed mode and produces about 1,000 joules per square centimeter. By comparison, a pulsed laser used for retinal surgery is about 10,000 times less powerful. The system delivers an enormous amount of photons it generates across large distances and then hits satellites orbiting overhead. It is able to do this because lasers form highly collimated beams, meaning the photons travel in parallel, preventing the beam from spreading out and diverging damage output. Kalina focuses its beam using a telescope with a diameter of several meters.

ISR satellites using electro-optical sensors tend to operate in LEO (Low-Earth Orbit) with an altitude of several hundred kilometers. It usually takes these satellites a few minutes to pass over any specific point on Earth, requiring Kalina to be able to operate continuously for that long while maintaining permanent track on the electro-optical sensors. These functions are carried out by the telescope system. Based on the reported details of the telescope, Kalina would be able to target an overhead satellite for hundreds of kilometers of its path. This makes it possible to protect a very large area of over 100,000 square kilometers from ISR satellites.

Russia already fields a number of laser and other directed energy weapons. Laser power levels are likely to continue to increase, making it possible to go beyond the temporary effect of dazzling to permanently damaging the electro-optical sensors used by ISR satellites. While laser technology development is heading in that direction, there are important policy considerations associated with using both lasers and ISR satellites. Permanent destruction of space-based sensors by any nation could be considered an act of war, leading to a rapid escalation of tensions, but the same goes for the use of ISR space-based assets to help target hostile military units and facilities. Resolving these issues requires long-term international treaties.

Of even greater importance is the deployment of laser and other offensive weapons in space. Such systems could be highly effective because the distances to targets are likely to be significantly reduced, in addition to the absence of atmosphere to weaken directed energy weapons beams. The power levels needed for space-based lasers to cause significant damage to spacecraft would be significantly reduced in comparison to ground-based systems. In addition, space-based lasers could be used to target any satellite by aiming lasers at propellant tanks and power systems, which, if damaged, would completely disable the spacecraft. Although the risk of escalation is high, what other choice does Russia have, given the political West’s continuous belligerence?

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... veillance/


Western Media Fail in Desperate Attempts to Ridicule Russia’s Use of Combat Lasers
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 28, 2022
Drago Bosnic

Image

Last week, Russia revealed it has been using combat lasers in military operations in Ukraine. Primary targets of these weapons are believed to be quadrocopter commercial drones the Ukrainian military has increasingly started relying on, as its much-touted “Bayraktar” TB-2 and other similar large drones have failed miserably, being picked off by Russia’s second-to-none air defenses. Commercial drones have the advantage of being much smaller and more readily available and, thus, easily replaceable, unlike expensive military drones such as the aforementioned “Bayraktar”. In addition, it is also more wasteful to fire expensive air defense missiles at such small targets, as most SAMs (surface to air missiles) cost tens of thousands of dollars or even millions in the case of strategic systems like the S-400.

Commercial drones, on the other hand, can cost as low as a few dozen dollars. The sheer production and financial discrepancy is severely affecting the economy of war. Thus, Russia decided to start using lasers to counter this new threat, to a crippling effect on the Ukrainian military. In this way, the Kiev regime forces are losing vital tactical ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance) capabilities, which directly affects their ability to provide immediate fire support for their units or organize successful artillery ambushes, which have had some effect during the initial stages of the special military operation.

This most definitely isn’t the first time Russia has used lasers. In 1984 Russia developed the first handheld laser weapon, intended for use by cosmonauts. In the 1970s, a Russian laser-armed tank named 1K17 Szhatie (Russian: 1К17 Сжатие – “Compression”) was developed. Even earlier, in the mid-1960s, a project codenamed Terra-3 (Russian: терра–3) was initiated. It was a Russian laser testing center, located at the Sary Shagan anti-ballistic missile (ABM) testing range in the Karaganda Region, present-day Kazakhstan. It was originally built to test missile defense concepts, but these attempts were dropped after the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty was signed (from which the US unilaterally withdrew in 2002). In 1987, a Russian laser-armed spacecraft, the Polyus/Skif-DM was launched.

Development of lasers was also continued after 1991. In 2012, Sokol-Eshelon (Russian: Сокол-Эшелон, lit. ’Falcon-Echelon’) project, a Russian airborne laser weapon based on a Beriev A-60 aircraft was resumed and is intended for use by Russian Aerospace Forces. The Peresvet (Russian: Пересвет), a Russian air defense/anti-satellite laser weapon was unveiled by President Vladimir Putin on 1 March 2018. Numerous other similar projects are being developed in Russia.

And yet, Western mainstream media’s reaction to the news has been quite childish, to say the least. It ranges from ridiculing to outright rejection that Russia can field such advanced weapons. This frustration most likely comes from the media-imposed image of Russia being “backward”. For decades, and in many ways, for centuries, Western portrayal of Russia has been very unflattering, to say the least. The Eurasian giant has been presented as a dark, cold place populated by a miserable, depressed populace. Thus, no significant technological advances could ever come from such a “horrible” place, let alone advanced weapons such as lasers, right? Well, wrong. Regardless of how much the political West enjoys its “reality” bubble, the actual reality never fails to come back and bite the ones ignoring it.

Current Western depreciation of Russia and its many world-changing achievements wasn’t present during the (First) Cold War, or at least not as omnipresent as we see nowadays. During the Soviet era, Russia shook the West to the core by achieving numerous technological milestones, especially in rocketry, space exploration, chemistry, physics and applied mathematics, among many other scientific advances. The political West at least acknowledged Russian achievements at the time, even while both sides were aiming tens of thousands of nuclear weapons at each other. There were even hordes of Western specialists and pundits studiously researching Russia and its achievements.

Naturally, the Western media still kept trying to portray Russia as less advanced, as propaganda is an integral part of any conflict, but what we see nowadays has reached tragicomical levels. Just how tragicomical, we could see for ourselves back in March, when a US-based Space Foundation organization censored the name of Yuri Gagarin. Needless to say, anyone with a basic capability to read knows this is the name of the first human in space. But it doesn’t matter to the mindless Russophobes. They simply need to do anything they can to try and twist reality, just so they could keep their self-imposed image of “backward Russia”, even if it means something this extreme.

This also explains the need to denigrate Russian claims about the usage of laser weapons. However, again, this situation is no less tragicomical. In their pitiful ignorance, the mainstream media have “forgotten” about the “irrelevant” fact that lasers are partially a Russian invention. Or more precisely, a Russian-American invention. The 1964 Nobel prize in Physics is a testament to that and here is the exact text:

“The Nobel Prize in Physics 1964 was divided, one half awarded to Charles Hard Townes, the other half jointly to Nicolay Gennadiyevich Basov and Aleksandr Mikhailovich Prokhorov ‘for fundamental work in the field of quantum electronics, which has led to the construction of oscillators and amplifiers based on the maser-laser principle.'”

So, the “backward” Russia has had lasers since at least 1964. And here are the Western mainstream media, ridiculing Russia for claims of using lasers in 2022, nearly 60 years later. To put that into perspective, it would be equivalent to ridiculing Lebanese people for claims of using wheels, which their Phoenician predecessors invented. Or ridiculing Greeks for claims of using the alphabet. Or even Americans, for claims of using airplanes. Simply put, it’s rather ridiculous to try and negate a certain country’s achievements only because of geopolitical circumstances.

The United States is deeply unpopular in the world, as most of the planet sees the belligerent power for what it is, largely because most of that same planet has directly experienced this belligerence. And yet, none of those countries are ridiculing America’s technological contributions to the world. But, as the American society is pushed ever deeper into ideologically motivated hatred and divisions (such as blind Russophobia, Sinophobia or other similar phobias), we’ll likely be seeing more such attempts at twisting the reality.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... at-lasers/

**********************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

***

Who and why struck at the Volnovakha penal colony in Yelenovka - Rybar's analysis

Yesterday, all the world news spread footage of the destroyed barracks where Ukrainian prisoners of war were kept: on the night of July 28-29, an artillery strike was carried out at the place where the prisoners were kept. The incident took place east of the village of Yelenovka in the Volnovakha correctional colony No. 120 . As a result of the incident , 50 servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were killed , 75 were injured. Our team has analyzed information from open sources and presents our analysis to your attention.



🔻Where did the blow come from?

The blow was inflicted on an extension located in the northern part of the Volnovakha correctional colony No. 120 . Given the limited number of places in the correctional institutions of the LDNR and the total number of prisoners of war over 10 thousand people, the colony is used at full capacity. All possible spaces are filled.

Annex coordinates: Analysis from the scene confirms that the eastern part of the building was most severely damaged, where a powerful fire and explosion occurred that blew out the windows. However, the place of impact is the same: a breach in the roof near the ridge. The direction of the roof breach and the source of fire directly indicate an attack from the northwest direction: the shooting was carried out from the trajectory47.8285224941822, 37.71083412073798



Marinka - Kurakhovo - triangle Sergeevka - Pokrovsk - Lucky .

We cannot but confirm or deny the version about the use of the American MLRS HIMARS : given the frequency of the use of "chimeras", collecting fragments is not a problem. The media noise around the American MLRS is intended, first of all, to show the whole world the real price of the supply of foreign weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

❗️But we have no reason to doubt that the blow to the Volnovakha penal colony was inflicted precisely by a rocket from the Ukrainian formations .

In our infographic , we indicated a distance of 70 km, corresponding to the maximum firing range of the GMLRS M30 ammunition from the HIMARS MLRS. But in fact, a blow could have been delivered from any MLRS.

🔻Why is the strike beneficial for Ukraine?

Chronology of events:
▪️The servicemen of the Azov National Regiment who surrendered were taken to the Volnovakha penal colony No. 120 on May 20. As of February 24, the territory of the complex was completely empty, according to Petr Andryushchenko , an adviser to the mayor of Mariupol . Only Ukrainian prisoners of war could be kept on the territory .

▪️As early as June 5, it became known about the plans of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, at the behest of the British curators, to strike at the colony in Yelenovka.

▪️On June 20, regular shelling of the colony was already reported : Ukrainian formations regularly fired aimed at the territory of the complex.

▪️On June 27, we reported that the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine was putting pressure on Deputy Prime Minister Irina Vereshchuk and demanded that the military personnel of the Azov National Regiment be included in the exchange lists, counting on the maximum media promotion of cases upon their return from captivity.

▪️On June 29, the largest exchange of prisoners of war took place according to the formula 144 for 144. 43 servicemen of the Azov National Regiment returned to Ukraine. The fact of the return of the “Azov”, inconsistency in decision-making, as well as unfulfilled promises caused a storm of indignation on the territory of Russia.

▪️Most likely, the reaction of the Russian society greatly complicated the process of the return of the "Azov" and, possibly, ruled out the possibility of their exchange. It was no longer possible to carry out the extraction procedure , and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine began to work out alternative scenarios.

▪️On July 28, a video confession to the crimes of one of the “Azov” members, Dmitry Kozatsky , was published . Everyone understood perfectly well that sooner or later such testimony would appear from his comrades. And the reputational success of the Azov National Regiment as a symbol of the Ukrainian nation will be nullified.

On the night of July 28-29, the Armed Forces of Ukraine struck at the Volnovakha correctional colony No. 120, once and for all closing the issue of the extraction procedure .

Image

***

Forwarded from
Readovka
The map of hostilities and the situation on the fronts on the evening of July 29

The key event of the outgoing Friday was the destruction by Ukrainian nationalists of their own "brothers" in captivity. As it became known tonight, the shelling of the colony in Yelenovka , where the prisoners of Azov were kept, was carried out from the American HIMAR MLRS. We can definitely say that this is a blatant provocation, committed with the aim of intimidating Ukrainian servicemen and preventing their surrender - in other words, the Kiev authorities are making ends meet . According to the latest data , 53 people died, 83 were injured. 8 employees of the isolation ward were also injured. Criminal case initiatedon the use of prohibited means and methods of warfare.

⚔️The situation on the fronts for the past day:

▫️In the Slavic direction, Russian troops are successfully developing an offensive against Soledar . Also, a tank attack was made on the enemy's firepower by our units from the direction of Bogorodichny .

▫️Fighting is underway in the area of ​​the village of Vershina in the Artemovsky (Bakhmutovsky) direction . There are no changes on the front line.

▫️In the Donetsk direction, the Armed Forces of Ukraine, after artillery preparation , tried to attack the positions of our troops southeast of Novopol . Having suffered losses, the enemy was able to gain a foothold in the "gray zone". Russian troops went on the offensive and occupied the Ukrainian trenches near Peski and Maryinka , taking prisoners.

▫️In the southern direction , our troops are being prepared for a possible offensive by Ukrainian formations. Disturbing artillery fire is being conducted on the accumulation of manpower and firepower of the enemy.

On our border - at about 5:00 from Ukraine about 10 shells were fired at the village of Klimovo and other settlements of the Bryansk region. There were no casualties or damage . Kursk agrarians are also unlucky today. During field work near the village of Elizavetovka in the Glushkovsky district, a tractor was blown up by unexploded ordnance. The driver is alive.

"Arrivals". AFU attacked the village of Brilevkain the Kherson region. The shelling of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions also does not subside - Ukrainian militants from Tekstilshchikov to Gorlovka threw the territory with anti-personnel mines "Petal". The Ukrainian Armed Forces shelled a granary in Kamenka-Dniprovska at night . Also, shelling was recorded in Novaya Kakhovka , Kherson region, and an ammunition depot in Vasilyevka, Zaporozhye region.

Image

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat Jul 30, 2022 10:47 pm

The civil war in Ukraine
Translated by Petr Yakovlev

Left-wingers are concerned about the question: should the Communists adhere to the „Leninist position“ and wish defeat for the Russian government in the conflict in Ukraine?

First of all, the following should be noted.

It is one thing to put forward the slogan of defeating our own government in conditions when we have real political power, but another thing is when behind us, like many other left groups, there are neither the masses, nor even an authoritative organization, that is, at least some solid connection with the masses. It is also necessary to take into account the presence or absence of a spontaneous upsurge of the mass revolutionary movement and the degree of its organization.

It makes sense to put forward the slogan of defeating one’s owns government only when there is a real movement of a sufficient mass of politically active citizens capable of supporting the slogan with their actions. Prior to the maturation of such a factor, it is proposed to conduct a deep and broad research and explanatory work, convincing readers of the scientific viability of the developed assessments of current events, on the basis of which is generated an appeal, a proposal promising to achieve a progressive goal, that is the slogan itself.

There is nothing simpler than advancing a heap of slogans. There is nothing more difficult than the guaranteed embodiment of one victorious slogan.

It is obvious, therefore, that, taking into account the already existing support for LDPR (Hereinafter this abbreviation means: „Lugansk and Donetsk people’s republics“ — transl.) among the masses, it is necessary not only to thoroughly theoretically work out the issue on the basis of historical specificity but also to ensure that this is to some extent interested in a relatively wide circle of participants in the process itself, that is, the majority of LDPR citizens. In other words, before putting forward the slogan, that is, to set the target of the struggle, it is necessary to carry out a tense, convincing propaganda campaign to clarify the class balance of power and present a detailed study of subsequent events and steps.

To shake the air with calls, when there is nothing behind the soul, there is a most harmful wildcat. We need to use the situation as it is, the most appropriate way for the purposes of the communist struggle, and not plunge into the sphere of loud but empty statements.

The greatest threat in a sober and mature consideration of such vital political issues is the fear of being accused along the line of any historical analogies.

In essence, this is a fear of moving aside from dogma. For example, to recognize that the influence of the Putin government in the civil war and the power of the „people’s republics“ brings much less blood and suffering than the defeat of the LDPR.

What points do we propose to pay attention to in the studying of the historical conditions of the civil war in Ukraine?

I. Is there a communist party, which is not inferior in quality to the Bolshevik Party, for the implementation of an independent policy of the working class
in a situation of civil war in Ukraine?

II. What specific situation will develop if one or the other side of the conflict is defeated or if both sides are defeated at the same time? Will it be more favorable for the cause of the development of communism in Russia and Ukraine? How will the defeat of the Russian government affect the population, provided that in Ukraine it is not the government play a decisive role, but the bankers, Banderaists and the US embassy?

III. How is the national question in Ukraine and how is the national question in Russia?

IV. What could harm humanitarian aid to LDPR from Russia? What are the „reverse sides“ of the support of these republics from Russia?

V. Is the LDPR population, supported by bourgeois Russia, a defending or aggressive side? Is it a fair war of the LDPR population against the government of Ukraine, Banderaism and the US oligarchs? What attitude from the Russian left-wingers deserves the steadfastness of the population of LDPR and its victims?

VI. Who in the current situation should wish defeat to his government: Russian or Ukrainian communists?

There is no doubt that the government of the Russian Federation is ultimately driven not by concern for the people of Crimea and Donbass, but by a program to strengthen the international weight of Russian capital.

Of course, the position of „a plague on both your capitalist houses“ in this case cannot be considered grossly erroneous and is a normal, healthy wish for any bourgeois states and not only in connection with any war. But it does not exempt from the obligation to consider the whole range of possible consequences and, therefore, from the development of specific tactics in solving this strategic problem.

What needs to be understood first?
First, Russia is ruled by an oligarchy, and the bourgeois state serves to the domination and growth of it. Any bourgeois class is interested only in increasing its profits and maintaining its dominance. The fate of the proletarians to the capitalists is humanly indifferent; they regard the masses of people only as a labor market and consumables for wars, at best as a sales market.

Second, in the case of bourgeois countries, not abstract Russia, Europe, the USA, Ukraine, Turkey, etc. collide in the international arena, as if some peoples organized into states, but the corresponding national detachments of the world bourgeoisie. Moreover, some units are relatively independent and have some power and claim to regional or even world domination, and some are subordinate to the stronger.

Third, therefore, there is no „fatherly concern“ of bourgeois Russia about its own or, even less so, foreign citizens, even if they are even carriers of Russian culture. Any sort of humanistic and humanitarian principle in the politics of a bourgeois state is mainly dust in the eyes, PR, a way to maintain the illusion of stability of the political and economic order, in which huge wealth is concentrated in private hands. Therefore, the only question is whether the participation of the Russian Federation in the civil war in Ukraine is pursuing political goals or are economic interests directly behind it. The government of the Russian Federation, as you know, is quite satisfied with the balance of power that has developed on the basis of the „Minsk Agreements“ and the sluggish positional course of the civil war: „the firsts cannot, the second do not want“.

Fourth, there is an opinion among some left-wingers that the policy of the Russian Federation concerning the Donbass is imperialistic, i.e., predatory. Is this so in reality? Even though state-monopoly capitalism has already developed in Russia, and the policy of the Russian Federation as a whole is imperialist in nature, in this particular case, strictly speaking, the policy of the Russian Federation in the Donbass is not imperialistic but has a defensive nature of political opposition to American imperialism. If Russian capital saw the economic benefits of LDPR, then there would be no „Minsk Agreements“. Besides, the position of such left-wingers completely ignores the will and movement of the people of Donbass itself.

The same with the joining of Crimea. The population of Crimea wanted to be a part of the bourgeois Russian Federation, that is, from the point of view of Marxism-Leninism, the entry of Crimea into the Russian Federation cannot be called as annexation. This, of course, does not honour, first of all, the Communists, who for almost 30 years of capitalism were unable to prove to the proletariat of Crimea the need for a sovereign policy of the working class. The Russian Federation has joined Crimea to itself, not for reasons of profit for the oligarchy, or even more so for the will of Crimeans, but because of a well-known political factor — ensuring the basing of the Black Sea Fleet and preventing the presence of a NATO base on the peninsula.

Of course, it is quite possible that in the Russian oligarchic milieu in the period 2014 — 2015 expansionary sentiment about Ukraine reigned because every bourgeoisie always wants somewhere to snatch something. But they quickly faded after economic calculations. And the strength of Russian corporations for such operations is still not enough.

The problem of many left-wingers is that they misinterpret the well-known Leninist formula that politics is a concentrated expression of the economy. It turns out vulgarity that any action of the bourgeois state must certainly bring direct material benefit to the capitalists. It must be understood that politics under capitalism concentrates expresses the economy as a whole thing, however, one should not confuse a political decision made by a specific person and politics as the main element of the entire bourgeois superstructure in the form of political ideas, political relations and political institutions.

Moreover, at short intervals in history, politics has primacy over the economy and under capitalism. A complete simplification in the analysis of historical phenomena would be to put in the first place only the economic interests of the bourgeoisie, especially the oligarchs of the Russian Federation. Today, the Putin government is not yet the mirror equality of interests of Russian oligarchs. Bonapartism is more characteristic of Putin, implicated in relatively mild nationalism, mild anti-communism, and bloated conceit.

Today, the oligarchs in the Russian Federation have nothing to do with the adoption of several government decisions. And the initiative to fight the Ukrainian government and the joining of Donbass to the Russian Federation comes primarily from the Russian-speaking population, who have to choose between capitalist exploitation in the Russian Federation and Banderaist-capitalist exploitation within Ukraine.

So, in the position of the Russian Federation, political motives are seen first of all.

It has been scientifically established and well known that the bourgeoisie systematically unleashes wars based on their economic interests and competitive urge to redistribute the world. However, did the Russian oligarchs unleash a civil war in Ukraine? It was not even unleashed by Ukrainian oligarchs. The Maidan, the joining of Crimea to the Russian Federation, the formation of LDPR and the civil war, despite the complex and contradictory course of these processes, are primarily a product of the policy of American and European oligarchs. The Russian bourgeoisie, in this case, acted according to the situation, trying not to weaken its position in the face of the loss of influence in Kiev.

The civil war in the Donbass has long been going on, and people die every month. The acute question is how to stop it. Theoretically, there is the prospect of a military victory for the oligarchy of the Russian Federation, at least on the territory of LDPR, and in this case, this turn of events seems to be the most painless form of achieving a long-awaited peace.

For the defeat of which government
Of course, we, as Marxists, in principle, stand on the position of the proletariat of the Donbass to turn our weapons against the bourgeoisie: Ukrainian, Russian, American, European, Donetsk, Lugansk. But such kind of action requires serious preparation, in particular, the formation in the Donbas of an influential Communist Party of the vanguard type and its gaining influence among the masses.

Some left-wingers quite abstractly call on the proletariat to „actively class struggle against the predatory and military policies of bourgeois governments“.

The call to the Ukrainian proletariat to fight against the Ukrainian government and the military operations of the Armed Forces is understandable and logical. But what does this call mean for the proletariat of LDPR? Stand for the defeat of LDPR? To surrender, even bourgeois, Donbass to Ukraine and American fascism?

We, Marxists, are extremely unsympathetic to oligarchic Russia, and we understand that the Russian capitalists are exploiting the proletarians no less than Ukrainian, French, American, etc. But we must be aware that the influence of the Marxists on the masses today is equal to zero. We must answer the question: what is more beneficial for the cause of Communism — the defeat of Russia and the LDPR, or the defeat of fascist Ukraine with its American patrons? The answer is obvious: the defeat of the Ukrainian government is better.

As for peace, there are three ways to force the bourgeoisie to end the civil war in the Ukrainian situation.

I. If a communist revolution takes place in Russia, Ukraine or the Donbass and the dictatorship of the working class resolves the issue peacefully or militarily.

II. If in Ukraine, power passes into the hands of a pro-Russian oligarchy.

III. If the Russian oligarchs need to resolve the issue by military means.

Such is the primary Marxist analysis of the situation.

Now all forces should be devoted to the training of the Communists, to the formation and promotion of the independent position of the working class of Donbass.

https://prorivists.org/eng_the-civil-war-in-ukraine/

********************

If Telling the Truth Puts Me on Ukraine’s ‘Russian Propagandist’ Blacklist, I’ll Wear that Proudly
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 29, 2022
Scott Ritter

When it comes to fact-based analysis, I’ll take so-called ‘Russian propaganda’ over ‘Ukrainian truth’ every day.

In 1997 I flew into Kiev, on-mission with the United Nations Special Commission to seek the assistance of the Ukrainian government in investigating the activities of a Ukrainian citizen suspected of illegally selling ballistic missile components and manufacturing capabilities to Iraq in violation of Security Council-imposed economic sanctions. During my visit, I held several meetings with senior officials from the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council, including its Secretary, Vladimir Horbulin. I left on good terms, with the Ukrainians agreeing to cooperate (they ultimately did not) and hoping that I would pass on their good attitude to US authorities in hopes that it would assist their desire for NATO membership (I did, in fact, do this.)

Twenty-five years later, this same National Security and Defense Council, through its “Center for Countering Disinformation,” has published a blacklist of individuals deemed to be “promoting Russian propaganda.”

My name is on this list. My “crimes” include describing Ukraine as a base of NATO, challenging the narrative surrounding the Bucha massacre, and defining the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia as a “proxy war between NATO and Russia.”

The Center for Countering Disinformation was established in 2021 on the order of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky. It is headed by Polina Lysenko, a lawyer who received her law degree in 2015, and whose resumé includes time with the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, the Office of the Prosecutor General (where she received a commendation from the US Federal Bureau of Investigation) and, up until her current appointment, as the Director of the Information Policy and Public Relations Department at a state-owned railway operator.

Lysenko unveiled the work of the Center for Countering Disinformation to the ambassadors of the G7 countries, as well as to Finland, Israel, and NATO shortly after her appointment. Her boss, the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Aleksey Danilov, emphasized “the importance of coordinating actions with strategic partners in combating hostile information operations and fighting disinformation,” while the head of the Office of the President, Andrey Yermak, indicated that he hoped “that the Center will become not only a Ukrainian center for countering disinformation, but also an international one.” According to Yermak, the center was “fully operational.”

Polina Lysenko, in outlining the goals and mission of her organization, emphasized that “the truth will be the main weapon.”

She should have started by fact-checking Yermak – two months after he’s declared her center “fully operational,” Ukrainian media was reporting that the center lacked “premises, funding, and staff.” Lysenko was the only employee, and “she has not been paid her salary for several months.” The Center was supposed to have a staff of 52, who were to be paid some $2,000 per month. The Ministry of Finance was responsible for finding the funds for the center, something it had not done as of mid-June 2021. Lysenko worked by herself from a “tiny office on the ground floor of the National Security and Defense Council building.”

It’s tough to tell the truth when you’re not being paid, it seems.

A year later, while funding and staff do not seem to be a problem (thanks in large part to the underwriting of the Ukrainian government payroll by the US taxpayer), quality control is. Take, for example, the case outlined by Lysenko and her new agency on disinformation against me. If “describing Ukraine as a base of NATO” makes one a Russian propogandist, then I should have been joined by Ben Watson, an editor with the notoriously pro-Russian (sarcasm emphasized) web-based journal, Defense One, who in October 2017 published an article with the self-explanatory headline “In Ukraine, the US Trains an Army in the West to Fight in the East.” The article detailed the work done by US and NATO military personnel at the Joint Multinational Training Group – Ukraine’s Yavoriv Combat Training Center in western Ukraine – literally a NATO base inside Ukraine – where every 55-days a Ukrainian Army battalion was trained to NATO standards for the sole purpose of being deployed into eastern Ukraine to fight Russian-backed separatists in Donbass.

I am guilty on all three charges, and more.

But I am no Russian propagandist.

The Center for Countering Disinformation was established in 2021 on the order of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky. It is headed by Polina Lysenko, a lawyer who received her law degree in 2015, and whose resumé includes time with the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, the Office of the Prosecutor General (where she received a commendation from the US Federal Bureau of Investigation) and, up until her current appointment, as the Director of the Information Policy and Public Relations Department at a state-owned railway operator.

Lysenko unveiled the work of the Center for Countering Disinformation to the ambassadors of the G7 countries, as well as to Finland, Israel, and NATO shortly after her appointment. Her boss, the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Aleksey Danilov, emphasized “the importance of coordinating actions with strategic partners in combating hostile information operations and fighting disinformation,” while the head of the Office of the President, Andrey Yermak, indicated that he hoped “that the Center will become not only a Ukrainian center for countering disinformation, but also an international one.” According to Yermak, the center was “fully operational.”

Polina Lysenko, in outlining the goals and mission of her organization, emphasized that “the truth will be the main weapon.”

She should have started by fact-checking Yermak – two months after he’s declared her center “fully operational,” Ukrainian media was reporting that the center lacked “premises, funding, and staff.” Lysenko was the only employee, and “she has not been paid her salary for several months.” The Center was supposed to have a staff of 52, who were to be paid some $2,000 per month. The Ministry of Finance was responsible for finding the funds for the center, something it had not done as of mid-June 2021. Lysenko worked by herself from a “tiny office on the ground floor of the National Security and Defense Council building.”

It’s tough to tell the truth when you’re not being paid, it seems.

A year later, while funding and staff do not seem to be a problem (thanks in large part to the underwriting of the Ukrainian government payroll by the US taxpayer), quality control is. Take, for example, the case outlined by Lysenko and her new agency on disinformation against me. If “describing Ukraine as a base of NATO” makes one a Russian propogandist, then I should have been joined by Ben Watson, an editor with the notoriously pro-Russian (sarcasm emphasized) web-based journal, Defense One, who in October 2017 published an article with the self-explanatory headline “In Ukraine, the US Trains an Army in the West to Fight in the East.” The article detailed the work done by US and NATO military personnel at the Joint Multinational Training Group – Ukraine’s Yavoriv Combat Training Center in western Ukraine – literally a NATO base inside Ukraine – where every 55-days a Ukrainian Army battalion was trained to NATO standards for the sole purpose of being deployed into eastern Ukraine to fight Russian-backed separatists in Donbass.

Pro hint, Ms Lysenko – when your country hosts a permanent contingent of NATO troops on its soil, that makes it a base of NATO.

Lysenko’s staff of top-notch disinformation-countering analysts (again, sarcasm) likewise highlighted my assessment of the massacre of civilians in Bucha in late March – early April as having been committed by Ukrainian forces. Lysenko was in good company here – I was banned from Twitter for this same analysis. Some four months removed from the atrocities committed in Bucha, I stand by my analysis – the fact set has not changed. I am prepared to debate this issue with Polina Lysenko and her entire staff, live on Ukrainian television, anytime she likes. I’ll debate it with anyone, anywhere – that’s how confident I remain in my original analysis. Truth, after all, is my main weapon.

The last charge levelled against me by Lysenko’s intrepid truth sleuths, that I’ve labelled the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia as a “proxy war between NATO and Russia,” again brings to question the professionalism of her staff. After all, the Moscow-born self-hating Russian, Max Boot, in an opinion piece published in the Washington Post on June 22, called the Ukraine conflict “our war, too.” It’s one of the few times I will agree with Max Boot on anything. Boot, however, was merely echoing US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s articulation of US policy regarding the Ukraine conflict as being focused on weakening Russia by supporting Ukraine – sort of the textbook definition of a “proxy conflict.”

Do better, Polina Lysenko – at least try to score some cheap points by highlighting the fact that much of my analysis regarding Ukraine is published by Russia Today (for instance, this article.) At least then you could say that I was being paid by Russia. Of course, you’d have to wrestle with the fact that my analysis is also published in numerous non-Russian outlets – I mean, what kind of Russian propagandist gets published by American and British publishers?

And then, of course, there is the tricky issue of the controlling Russian editorial staff. The following exchange serves as a guide:

Me: Any interest in me doing a deep dig on Stoltenberg’s presentation on “paying the price”?

Controlling Russian Editor: What’s your take?

Me: I don’t think Stoltenberg understands the scope of the price tag.

Controlling Russian Editor: It’s the same speech where he said ‘stop complaining’, yeah?

Me: Yes.

Controlling Russian Editor: Cool, let’s do it.

The strategic intent of the Russian propaganda machine is well documented there. I can’t believe I fell for it.

All sarcasm aside, the publication by Lysenko’s Center of a blacklist of so-called “Russian propagandists” should be an insult to anyone who believes in the concepts of free speech. I’m proud to be associated with many of those who joined me on that list – Ray McGovern, Tulsi Gabbard, Douglas MacGregor, John Mearsheimer, and others. I’m confident everyone named here would say that their motivations in taking the stance they have about the Ukraine conflict is to pursue the truth – real truth, not the confused version promulgated by Polina Lysenko and her American-paid analysts. None consider themselves to be Russian propagandists, but rather American practitioners of free speech, the kind protected by the same US Constitution many of the named individuals (and myself) have taken an oath to uphold and defend.

I’ll conclude by speaking for myself – if adhering to fact-based analysis that has withstood the test of time is the new definition of “Russian propaganda,” then count me in. It certainly is better than the Orwellian version of free speech being bandied about by the US government and its proxies in Ukraine (see what I did there?).

US Should Not Fund Ukrainian ‘Blacklist’ https://consortiumnews.com/2022/07/27/u ... blacklist/

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... t-proudly/

Why is Europe Silent on Ukraine’s Attempts to Create a New Chernobyl?
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 29, 2022
Vladimir Danilov

Image

Ukraine, on the eve of a decision by residents liberated from Kiev’s Nazi regime to hold a referendum on Zaporozhye Region becoming part of Russia, has turned to nuclear terrorism, trying to destroy nuclear power plants, intimidate civilians and force residents to leave the region. To this end, Kiev’s regime attacked the Zaporozhskaya NPP with UAV strikes on July 20. The day before, two other Ukrainian drones also struck a building near the Zaporozhskaya NPP, and then Ukrainian security forces used the UAV in a residential area of the NPP. The attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Zaporozhskaya NPP injured 11 employees, four of whom are currently in serious condition. It is only by sheer luck that the attacks on the Zaporozhskaya NPP did not result in damage to the plant’s equipment and a man-made Armageddon.

These attacks could undoubtedly be a “preparatory fire” for a subsequent massive attack on the Zaporozhskaya NPP. By doing so, Kiev is creating clear conditions for a nuclear disaster for all of Europe.

This was stated by Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on July 21, stressing that provocations are continuing in Ukraine with the aim of threatening nuclear facilities and the security of the entire world. As Zakharova stressed, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have been carrying out drone attacks for several days on the territory of the Zaporozhskaya nuclear power plant, in the immediate vicinity of the safety-critical facilities — the spent fuel storage facility and the reactor cooling tank. It is only by sheer luck that this has not yet resulted in damage to the plant’s equipment and a man-made disaster similar to Chernobyl. If missiles from Ukraine reach directly the vital systems of the Zaporozhskaya NPP, half of Europe would suffer a disaster. “This confirms the Ukrainian authorities’ aim to create prerequisites for a nuclear disaster not only on their own territory, but on the entire territory of Europe,” the Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman stressed to the world community.

At the same time, Maria Zakharova stressed that responsibility for the possible consequences of such behavior by the Kiev regime lies both with Ukraine and with the states that provide military support to the criminal regime.

Russia has therefore once again called on the United Nations, the International Atomic Energy Agency and other international organizations to exert influence on official Kiev and take effective measures to prevent provocations at Ukraine’s radiation-hazardous facilities.

According to a member of the General Council of the Zaporozhye Region Administration, Vladimir Rogov, one of the reasons for the military’s attacks on the Zaporozhskaya NPP may also be the Kiev regime’s desire to hide prohibited experiments there while the plant was under Kiev’s control and disrupt a possible arrival of an IAEA inspection at the plant. At the same time, Rogov said that a large amount of nuclear materials, which are not required for the operation of the plant and could not be a result of its reactors, were found at the plant. He explained that according to the regulations, experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) must formally record all illegal activities of the Kiev regime at nuclear power plants. As IAEA Director General Grossi announced in late May, Zaporozhskaya NPP before February had 30,000 kilograms of weapons-grade plutonium and 40,000 kilograms of enriched uranium, enough to produce nuclear weapons. Grossi therefore intended to send an IAEA mission to the ZNPP to ensure that the uranium and plutonium “have not been used for other purposes” by the Kiev authorities.

Despite the Kiev regime’s lack of means to build nuclear weapons in recent years, enough nuclear waste not accounted for by the IAEA could nevertheless be used to build a “dirty bomb.” Reports of Kiev possibly building a “dirty nuclear bomb” emerged at the start of the Russian Armed Forces’ special operation to defend Donbass, after Russia had taken control of Ukraine’s nuclear industry facilities. If confirmed by the IAEA, the main question for the authorities in Kiev would be how the materials to produce such an amount of enriched uranium and plutonium were obtained, as they fall under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. And Ukraine, as a party to international agreements, will have to give explanations. Because the Russian company TVEL, which supplies the nuclear fuel, takes back the spent material and this requirement is clearly enforced, preventing the recipient country from carrying out manipulations that could violate the non-proliferation treaty.

Although robust Russian air defense systems are deployed near the nuclear plant, the area remains a “pressure point” until the Ukrainian militants are pushed back several tens or hundreds of kilometers. After all, there are representatives of the liberated regions of Donbass on one bank of the Dnepr River – in Energodar – while on the other one, in Nikopol and other localities, there are militants of Ukrainian President Zelensky.

The militants of the Kiev regime have repeatedly shown their commitment to nuclear terrorism in recent times. Thus, on the night of March 4, a Ukrainian sabotage group staged an armed provocation, which resulted in an armed clash near the Chernobyl NPP training center. On March 9, Ukrainian nationalists carried out another attack on the substation and power lines feeding the cooling system of the spent fuel storage facility located at the Chernobyl NPP. At the same time, they created obstacles for repairmen to restore the power substation, which could have led to another disaster there had Russian troops not localized these criminal actions.

Apart from Chernobyl, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) and the Azov battalion militants were planning to blow up a reactor at the Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology in early March and blame the Russian Armed Forces for a missile attack on the experimental nuclear facility, TASS reported. On March 7, the Japanese Prime Minister expressed his concern about the above-mentioned actions of the Kiev militants during a parliamentary debate. He stressed that the issue was of concern to the entire world. “The international order, including in Asia, has been shaken,” he added.

In this connection, it is pertinent to recall that on February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that the Russian Federation would not allow Ukraine to have nuclear weapons, following which Russia launched a military special operation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine. And units of the Russian Airborne Troops soon took control of the area around the Chernobyl and Zaporozhskaya NPPs to prevent nuclear provocations by militants at those facilities.

The fact that Kiev-controlled militants regularly carry out provocations aimed at creating an emergency situation at Ukrainian nuclear power plants and other nuclear facilities, which the West uses to fuel anti-Russian hysteria at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), was already brought to international attention by Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova on March 12: “Attacks against one’s own nuclear facilities are already becoming a trademark of the ruling regime in Ukraine. The blame for this lies entirely with Kiev, US masters of Volodymyr Zelensky and US’s NATO vassals. Without such support these provocations would be meaningless,” she added. “Western political adventurers encouraging Zelensky’s actions are endangering not only the lives of Ukrainians and Russians, but also the entire Europe.” “Having a well-developed nuclear industry, Russia is fully aware of the potential risks to nuclear infrastructure and is doing its utmost to ensure the proper safety of Ukraine’s nuclear facilities,” Zakharova said.

In connection with the above, especially with the July 20 attack by Zelensky’s militants on the Zaporozhskaya nuclear power plant using UAVs, it is surprising that there is no effective international response to such provocative actions by Kiev, which could unleash nuclear Armageddon. And not just for Europe. This brings to mind the attempts by US President Biden and British Prime Minister Johnson to summon an urgent UN Security Council meeting in March in response to propaganda and inflammatory statements by Zelensky on the alleged deterioration of the safety of the nuclear power plants at Chernobyl and Zaporozhye after they were taken over by Russia. Today, however, these “guarantors of Kiev” remain silent, clearly hoping that in the event of a new militant provocation, the threat of a possible nuclear disaster will not affect their countries…

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... chernobyl/

*********************

GORILLA RADIO ASKS: WILL THE WAR IN EUROPE END IN GERMANY AGAIN, LIKE 1945?

Image

By John Helmer, Moscow
@bears_with

Never mind the bang and whimper with which the pietistical Anglo-American Harvard alumnus and Tory snob Tom Eliot ended his 1925 poem, “The Hollow Men”. Whatever he could have known and didn’t then, can’t answer the question now: How will this war in Europe end?

Last week the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov answered by drawing a geographic line three hundred kilometres westward and southwestward from the Russian border, including Donetsk, Lugansk, Sevastopol, Kaliningrad, Brest and Hrodna (Belarus). That is, the direct line of fire by the artillery, rocket, or missile batteries which the US and the NATO allies are installing.

“Now the geography is different,” Lavrov said. “It is more than the DPR [Donetsk People’s Republic], the LPR [Lugansk People’s Republic], but also the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions and a number of other areas. This process continues, consistently and persistently. It will continue as long as the West, in its impotent rage, desperate to aggravate the situation as much as possible, continues to flood Ukraine with more and more long-range weapons. Take the HIMARS [High Mobility Artillery Rocket System]. Defence Minister Alexey Reznikov [Kiev] boasts that they have already received 300-kilometre ammunition. This means our geographic objectives will move even further from the current line. We cannot allow the part of Ukraine that Vladimir Zelensky, or whoever replaces him, will control to have weapons that pose a direct threat to our territory or to the republics that have declared their independence and want to determine their own future.”

Will this line extend to Lvov in western Ukraine, or somewhere between Dniepropetrovsk, Kiev, and the Polish border, Lavrov was asked. The answer will not be given by diplomatic negotiations, he replied. “There is a solution to this problem. The military know this.”

What the deuce? Gorilla Radio’s Chris Cook asks the question and Gorilla Radio broadcasts the answers.

To follow the distances the war is being fought across unfamiliar geography, here are the US and NATO firing points on the map:

MAP OF US-NATO BASES WEST OF THE UKRAINE WITHIN 300 KMS OF RUSSIAN AND BELARUS BORDERS, AS OF 2020

Image
Source: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/

Redzikowo, in the northwest of Poland, where the US has based nuclear-armed Aegis missiles, is 278 kilometres by dog-legged highway to Kaliningrad. By direct missile flight it is less than 230 kms.

Image

The distance from Deveselu, in the southwest of Romania, where the US has based nuclear-armed Aegis missiles, to Odessa is about 350 kms as the missile flies; to Sevastopol, Crimea, the flight distance is 453 kms:

Image

Source: https://www.distance.to/

http://johnhelmer.net/gorilla-radio-ask ... more-68898

**********************

Karmic boomerang
July 30, 14:35

Image

When Russian children were burned alive in Kemerovo, Yaroslav Bais, a militant from Azov, wrote that it was a "boomerang". In general, he wrote a lot. For example, that a truce will come when all Russians "die".
Then he was taken prisoner and even treated. And yesterday a rocket from the Hymars flew to him, and now he himself is on the list of those burned alive at number 30. This is what a boomerang really looks like.

Image
Image

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7769645.html

Graham Phillips in Lysychansk
July 29, 23:15

Image

Graham Phillips visited the liberated Lisichansk. It is worth noting that the other day he was included in the British (!) Sanctions list. Although earlier he quite calmly worked in the Donbass and did not fall under sanctions. But times have changed.




Plus a few more stories from the American military commander Patrick Lancaster from Lisichansk.





https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7768709.html

GUR MOU and the destruction of Ukrainian prisoners of war in Yelenovka
July 29, 22:00

Image

GUR MOU and the destruction of Ukrainian prisoners of war in Yelenovka

1. After the tantrums of Denisova, who was raped with a spoon, the issues of the exchange of prisoners were taken over by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense, which promised to make the process of negotiations and exchanges less public.

2. The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense was directly involved in ensuring the process of "extraction" (that is, capitulation) of the remnants of the AFU grouping at Azovstal. Representatives of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense made statements that a "fine special operation to liberate" was underway, trying to explain by this the surrender of the remnants of the Mariupol group.

3. Also during the negotiations on the "extraction" it was the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense that chose Yelenovka as the place of detention of prisoners from Azovstal, with which our negotiators agreed (the wounded were taken to Novoazovsk). Basurin confirmed this today.

4. That is, the path of prisoners of war from Azovstal to the Elenovka colony was laid by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense, which first agreed on the terms of surrender, and then on where the prisoners of war would be kept and what guarantees of detention the DPR gives.

5. The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense also collects target designations for strikes and sabotage from the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other departments. The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense openly declares that various objects on the territory of the DPR were hit on the basis of information received through the technical and intelligence channels of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense.

6. Further more interesting. Back on June 5, the Nezygar channel published a post https://t.me/russica2/46486 about possible strikes by the Armed Forces of Ukraine using Western weapons, where among the targets at number 2 was the colony in Yelenovka.

The second goal is a prisoner of war camp in the village of Yelenovka, where the Nazis from Azovstal and the military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are located.
The British want to frame the MLRS strike as an attempt by the Russian Armed Forces to hide "execution and torture of prisoners, and then hype on Bucha's

temnik" Nezygar referred to the Mi-6 proposals.
Mi-6 more than closely coordinates (and this is putting it mildly) the actions of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense and a number of other Ukrainian structures.

7. In June-July, deliveries of Western heavy MLRS to Ukraine began, after which they began to be used using NATO intelligence data, as well as data collected by the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense. Blows were delivered, including on Yelenovka.

June 7 https://ura.news/news/1052559619
June 10 https://regnum.ru/news/3616373.html
June 12https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/14892965
July 2 https://ria.ru/20220702/elenovka-1799805417.html
July 16 https://iz.ru/1365865/2022-07-17/ukrainskie- boeviki-obstreliali-elenovku-v-dnr-iz-artillerii
July 23 https://ria.ru/20220723/dnr-1804567273.html

And so on. Shelling was carried out almost regularly throughout June and July. Cannon artillery with a caliber of 122-152mm, MLRS "Grad" and "Uragan" were used.

8. On July 29 (the day after the publication of the testimony of one of the captured Nazis about the involvement of Zelensky's entourage in issuing criminal orders to kill civilians), rockets from the recently delivered Western MLRS arrive very accurately at the same Yelenovka, which the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been shelling for several months. The GUR MOU knows where the Ukrainian prisoners of war are. GUR MOU provides target designation for strikes and terrorist attacks. The Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense is in close contact with the Mi-6, while according to Nezygar, the Mi-6 was considering the option of using high-precision Western weapons to destroy Ukrainian prisoners of war in the Zelensky colony in early June, while the shelling of Yelenovka continued.

9. The threats of the Nazis from "Azov" to find and punish the perpetrators of the "murder of brothers" ordinary white noise - if they are too outraged, the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense will bury them somewhere in the forest, and then say that these are "peaceful victims of the Russian aggressor" . Therefore, they will make some noise and pretend that this is a "cynical Russian provocation", although, of course, they know perfectly well who let their brothers in on minced meat.

10. Whether Budanov and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense acted only as the perpetrator of this terrorist act, or whether he was entrusted with organizing the elimination of uncomfortable witnesses who began to talk too much, remains to be seen.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/58756 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7768500.html

Fake about Macedonian tanks
July 29, 19:29

Image

North Macedonia handed over to Ukraine T-72 tanks, which Russia had once presented to Ukraine as fraternal aid against the Albanians.

Now that your attention has been drawn ( https://t.me/rbc_news/54878 ), let's talk about how fact-checking overcomes evil.

The Serbian portal RTS ( https://www.rts.rs/page/stories/ci/stor ... ijuni.html ) published a note on the morning of July 29, in which described how North Macedonia is handing over T-72 tanks to Ukraine. “The Macedonian army has 31 vehicles of this type in service. These tanks were supplied to the authorities of Skopje by Russia in 2000 during the uprising of Ali Ahmeti’s People’s Liberation Army,” write the Serbs. This note was brought to the attention of the Russian Interfax ( https://www.interfax.ru/world/854422 ), honestly reprinting the information without double-checking.

Following Interfax, the information of the Serbian RTS is being reprinted by the Ukrainian media, which, despite all the events of the past five months, are still closely monitoring the Russian media in search of informational reasons. And now UNIAN ( https://t.me/uniannet/66165?single ) writes about a Russian gift given to Ukrainians.

In reality, of course, everything was a little different: not a gift, but a sale, and not by Russia, but by Ukraine. In 1999, even before the start of the Albanian uprising, Ukraine and then just Macedonia signed a contract for the supply of military equipment from Soviet reserves, RBC notes. Deliveries, Kyiv, of course, delayed. A batch of Soviet-made T-72A from 31 combat vehicles came to Skopje only in 2001. “This is the last batch of tanks to Macedonia, which was carried out in accordance with the agreement concluded between Ukraine and Macedonia in 1999. We, as a contracting party with Macedonia, assumed certain obligations, and as a predictable and reliable partner, we had to fulfill them," he said ( https://news.liga.net/all/news/ukraina-postavila-v- madedoniyu-31-tank-t-72) in 2001, Anatoly Zlenko, then Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine.

In 2022, the circle closed and the T-72A drove back.

In connection with this story, I would like to draw attention to several points. Firstly, Ukrainian monitors continue to follow their Russian counterparts just as closely as before, when the Ukrainian media generally followed the lead of Russian media giants. The story of the transfer of the “Russian gift” to Ukraine was born not in the bowels of the CIPSO, but in the Russian information field. Secondly, it is certainly interesting to observe the tonality of informational reasons wandering from the country - if for the Serbs the transfer of "Russian" tanks to Ukraine looks like an occasion to once again reproach their southern neighbor, who betrayed the Slavic brotherhood and left for NATO, then in the Ukrainian media and blogs this history turns into yet another reason to laugh at Russia.

By the way, where did the rumors about the transfer of Russian tanks to North Macedonia in 2000 really come from? It’s hard to imagine now, but their roots are in the once-existing “brotherhood” of Moscow and Kyiv. In 2000, the British Times published an article on the supply of arms to Macedonia by Michael Evans, which stated that both Russia and Ukraine were supplying weapons to this conflict zone. “The main supplier of weapons is Ukraine. But, of course, Russian weapons are also coming in. There is no doubt that the government is behind this. By the way, these weapons are supplied on absolutely legal grounds, these operations cannot be called illegal,” the author of the article said in an interview with the then-not-yet-foreign media agent Radio Liberty.

https://t.me/vatfor/7922 - zinc

In general, as in a joke - not in chess, but in preference, and did not win, but lost.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7768034.html

War in Ukraine. Summary 07/30/2022
July 30, 21:53

Image


War in Ukraine. Summary 07/30/2022

1. Artyomovsk.
Fighting in the Vesela Dolina region. After the capture of Klinovoye and Pokrovsky, the RF Armed Forces intensify the defeat of enemy positions on the outskirts of Artemovsk and concentrations of forces to the west of the city. To the south-east of Artemovsk, the RF Armed Forces, after clearing the Uglegorsk TPP and Novolugansk, took part of Semigorye and are expanding their zone of control in the area of ​​Novolugansk and Dolomitnoye. After the end of the battles for Semigorye, we can expect the start of full-fledged battles for Kodema. The enemy continued shelling from heavy MLRS targets in the depths of the LDNR.

2. Soledar.
Fights in Bakhmutsky, Belogorovka, Yakovlevka.
Fighting on the eastern outskirts of Soledar. In the city, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are striking at locations and concentrations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the outskirts.

3. Seversk.
After the transfer of reserves from the Slavic direction, the enemy was able to stabilize the front and continues to hold key heights around Seversk. The Seversk-Soledar road is also controlled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, although it is exposed to artillery fire from the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
Fights in the area of ​​Serebryanka, Verkhnekamensky, Ivano-Daryevka.

4. Kharkov.
Fights in the area of ​​Upper Saltov, Lower Passages, Nursery, Liptsov, Tsupovka, Uda. There are unconfirmed reports of the advance of the RF Armed Forces near Borshcheva. Intense attacks on Kharkov, Chuguev, Zolochev. The Armed Forces of Ukraine fired on Cossack Lopan and border villages. Several concentrations of enemy forces were destroyed in Kharkov.

5. Slavyansk.
Positional battles in the area of ​​Prishib, Sidorov, Dolina, Bogorodichny. There are no serious advances on the front. Attacks on the Slavic-Kramatorsk agglomeration, on Krasnoarmeysk. There is a noticeable bias in the hunt for heavy artillery of the enemy and the remaining air defense systems. On the Izyum direction - without any changes. Moderately intense fighting in the area of ​​Bolshaya Kamyshevakhi, Kurulka. In the Balakleya area - no changes.

6. Avdiivka.
To the north of Avdiivka, fighting along the Avdiivka-Konstantinovka highway, in the area of ​​Kamenka and New York - without significant progress.
To the south of Avdiivka, the DPR army is stepping up pressure on Peski and Krasnohorivka, having achieved advancement through a continuous enemy fortified area.
The attack on Avdiivka does not promise any immediate success. It is possible that all this will eventually turn out to be restrictive actions to prevent the Armed Forces of Ukraine from transferring reserves to other directions.

7. Carbon.
Positional fights. Fighting at Novomikhailovka, in Marinka. To the east of Velikaya Novoselka, the enemy attacked unsuccessfully in the direction of Novopol.
On our part, they say that they are strengthening control over the villages south of Velikaya Novoselovka. Positional tendencies dominate here. It was from this direction that Ukrainian prisoners in the Yelenovskaya colony were destroyed by a HIMARS MLRS strike.

8. Zaporozhye.
On the line Kamenskoye-Orekhov-Gulyaipole - without significant changes. Medium-intensity combat operations. The enemy launches missile strikes on Melitopol and Tokmak, reinforces the grouping in Zaporozhye, which, if possible, can launch attacks in the direction of Vasilyevka, Tokmak and Pologi, which can become an alternative to the “attack on Kherson” (another fallback option is Balakleya in the Izyum direction) .

9. Nikolaev.
The enemy, after weeks of chatter about the "attack on Kherson," switched to chatter about the "offensive of the RF Armed Forces on Nikolaev." Unsuccessful attempts at offensives near Vysokopole, Davydov Brod, Belogorka showed the costly nature of the attacks, and that in order to achieve success in the conditions of dominant aviation and unsuppressed artillery, much more forces and readiness to bear more serious losses are required. Therefore, now the emphasis is on strikes on bridges across the Dnieper and ammunition depots of the RF Armed Forces, as well as terrorist attacks on territories liberated from the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
The RF Armed Forces in the Nikolaevsky, Krivorozhsky and Nikopol directions are still on the defensive. There is a build-up of forces and an increasing systematic strikes against Nikolaev.
The most dangerous for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is the Krivoy Rog direction. The offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Nikolaev seems unlikely.

10. Odessa, Dzerzhinsk, Sumy - no change.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/58852 - zinc (broadcast of hostilities in Ukraine on a daily basis as usual in Telegram, who are interested, subscribe)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7770441.html

Google Translator

*****************

Forwarded from
Readovka
Map of hostilities and the situation on the fronts on the evening of July 30, 2022

Tonight, the Armed Forces of Ukraine again mined the center of Donetsk with anti-personnel mines-petals. Despite the work of air defense, mines fell to the ground from downed Ukrainian missiles - many of them did not explode, so it is now deadly to move along the streets of Donetsk - both for drivers and pedestrians. Traffic in the center of Donetsk is blocked - the Ministry of Emergency Situations and sappers are working on the roads.

⚔️The situation on the fronts for the past day:

▫️In the Kharkiv direction , there are unconfirmed reports of the advance of the RF Armed Forces near Borshcheva. Our troops are trying to take up strong positions in Liptsovo, Pitomnik, Udy, Tsupovka, Upper Saltov, Lower Passages.

▫️In the Slavic direction , fighting is underway on the outskirts of Soledar, Belogorovka, Yakovlevka and Bakhmut.

▫️On the Artemovsky (Bakhmutovsky) direction , fighting is underway in the Veselaia Dolina area. You can also expect the start of imminent battles for Kodema.

▫️In the Donetsk direction, the fighting is going on in the village of Peski. In Maryinka, there is progress in the village development. Heavy fighting is also taking place on the outskirts of Krasnogorovka. To the north of Avdiivka, our troops crossed the railway line and took fire control of the main route.

▫️In the southern direction in the Zaporozhye and Nikolaev regions, the situation remained unchanged. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are gradually strengthening the group in anticipation of the Russian offensive. Artillery shelling of the village of Lomakovka was carried out this morning

along our border area from the side of Ukraine . There were no casualties. Also, the Ukrainian side fired at the village of Tyotkino, Glushkovsky district. According to preliminary data, no victims.

Image

***

Сolonelcassad
❗️🇷🇺🇺🇦 The situation in the Donetsk-Zaporozhye direction
as of 23.00 July 30, 2022

🔻 On the Donetsk sector: The

Ukrainian command is trying to divert the attention of the allied forces from the Avdiivka direction.

▪️A platoon of the 110th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, with the support of two tanks, is attempting a counterattack in the area of ​​​​the settlement of Spartak . Ukrainian cannon artillery fires at Mineralny , Krutaya Balka and Dugout . Target designation is provided by UAV crews of the 27th rocket artillery brigade from the territory of the Refractory Plant in Krasnogorovka .

▪️MLRS and artillery of the RF Armed Forces continuously strike at the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Avdiivka . The Ukrainian command sent additional units of the mobilized to the most weakened areas of defense, and in the vicinity of Toretsk transferred several artillery installations.

▪️Subdivisions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked the areas of Nikolsky , Blagodatny , Vladimirovka , Kirillovka , Yegorovka .

🔻 In the Zaporizhia sector:

The situation in the Zaporozhye region remained unchanged. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are gradually strengthening the group in anticipation of the Russian offensive.

▪️Western-made anti-tank missile systems were delivered to the forward positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Orekhovo , Novoandreevka , Burchak , Kamensky . In the Yulyevka area, the construction of a stronghold of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is underway.

▪️Units of the 65th Ombre continue to strengthen their positions. In the vicinity of Veselyanka and Kirovo , the 3rd battalion of the Armed Forces brigade was deployed, and the M777 howitzer was deployed in Veselyanka .

▪️Soldiers of the 44th OBR conduct reconnaissance using RQ-20 Puma drones. 16 Krab self-propelled howitzers will be deployed to the Zaporozhye region to conduct more intensive fire on the positions of the RF Armed Forces .

Image

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sun Jul 31, 2022 2:33 pm

Azov: The structural continuity of power
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 07/31/2022

Image

PART 3. Borodach's men and the structural continuity of power in Azov

As Nackor reflects , in early May 2014, Men in Black detachments arrived in Berdyansk. In this city, they were temporarily installed in the pension building “Домик у моря” (The House by the Sea), before later being transferred to the future local base “Brisa”. From Berdyansk, members of the Black Corps made their first combat sorties in the Azov Sea region, in the direction of Mariupol.

A few days before the informal creation of the Borodach Division on May 14, Azov was officially constituted on May 5. On that day, the Ministry of the Interior of post-Maidan Ukraine proceeds to make the Black Corps official. The new Azov Battalion is configured as a battalion of the special police patrol service (BPSMOP) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. A special police intervention battalion, although with a vocation for military action.

The successful mobilization of Azov and its internal structures, such as the Borodach, made it possible to set up a Regiment with the same name in just four months. On September 17, 2014, by order of the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, the Azov Battalion was reorganized and expanded to form the Azov Special Police Regiment of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The process is consolidated on November 11, 2014. On that date, the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine signs an order to transfer the Azov Regiment to the National Guard of Ukraine. In this way, the Azov unit becomes a part of the 3057 military unit of the National Guard of Ukraine, albeit as a special and separate unit from the latter. This consolidates the transition from police structures to strictly military ones.

Maksim Zhorin's accession to command in 2016

Although initially obscured by the diversity of groups that converge in Azov and try to impose themselves within it, originally the new Battalion has Andriy Biletsky as its true command reference. However, Biletsky quickly made the move to politics and joined the Ukrainian Rada as of the 2014 elections. For this reason, in the fall of that year, he transferred the command of the police-military unit to one of his main supporters in what had been his Ukrainian Patriots group, Igor Mikhailenko ( Cherkas ).

A gray figure in the movement, without Biletsky's charisma, Mikhailenko would never have the full support of the Borodach veterans. And so, at the end of the summer of 2016, the command of Azov finally passes to Maksim Zhorin ( Mose ) who had become the main reference of the Bearded Division, after the physical incapacitation of Vlad Korenok ( Buba ). Called to have a decisive weight in Azov, the injury of 2014, and the loss of his right leg, prevent the then deputy commander of the First Century of Azov (basically the Borodach Division) from replacing Mikhailenko. Zhorin, Buba 's main friend in Azov, replaces him in that role.

To guarantee the continuity strategy of the command structures, however, Cherkas formally remains second to Mose until his retirement from military life in 2017. In fact, Mikhailenko is still part, along with Biletsky and Zhorin, of the structures of power of the National Corpus, the party of Azov, and has been the visible head of organizations of the movement such as the National Militia-Druzhina, the parapolice unit of the movement, and Centuria (structures in which Vlad Korenok).

Although Zhorin's loyalty to Biletsky is a reflection of the desire for continuity in Azov, his accession to power in the Azov Regiment represents a key moment in the unit's internal history, to the extent that his promotion represents, in a certain way, a generational rupture. in the command of Azov. In this sense, it represents the transfer of power from the generation closest to Biletsky to that represented by the members with weight in the Borodach Division, essentially the young recruits who confront the Anti-Maidan militants in the streets of kyiv, Kharkiv or Mariupol.

It is in the period of Maksim Zhorin that the Borodach reference appears most palpably in public life. Perhaps its clearest expression is observed during Azov's presence in Odessa in 2016, during the police-military control action of the city in 2016 on the second anniversary of the events of May 2, 2014.

Denis Prokopenko, Redis

Since Zhorin's arrival at the Azov command, continuity in the Azov military hierarchy, marked by the Borodach power, will become a reality. The main example in this regard is the rise to power of Denis Prokopenko ( Redis ), despite his apparent youth, another veteran of the movement. In September 2017, Prokopenko replaced Zhorin, reoriented towards the political management of the National Corps, especially in the Kharkov area and neighboring provinces. Redis then becomes, at the age of 26, the youngest regimental commander in the history of the Ukrainian armed forces.

Image

As the November 2015 interview with the Azov magazine "Black Sun" reveals, Prokopenko's main inspiration for joining the nationalist extreme right must be found in his family history, with a grandfather of Karelian-Finnish origin who, in his childhood, sees much of his family is decimated during the Finnish-Russian winter war of 1939-1940. Heir to the family hatred towards the Russian and Soviet world, for Prokopenko the parallelism between Karelia and Donbass is an evident fact that leads him to put into practice the need to protect the Ukrainian land , even if it is at the cost of his own life. “ To me, this is blood revenge. I had a dream to fight the Russians… I'm glad it happened”, says Prokopenko. For him, Maidan “[ I]t was a little training before the anti-terrorist operation, we had to prepare for the war gradually. When the fighting started in the east, I quickly finished all my work, came back from work and went to the front .” To Marinka, where he had his first combat experience during the assault on the city; then to Ilovaisk and then “ everything went smoothly ”.

In terms of the hierarchy of power, political and military, the most interesting thing about the interview is that it clearly reveals Prokopenko's link to the group of Buba and Maksim Zhorin. Thus, Redis , who also came from the Men in Black, joined the first platoon of the first company of Azov in 2014, a little before the formation of Borodach, a platoon then commanded by Buba who also held the position of assistant to the company commander in Azov. Zhorin, for his part, was responsible for the first squad of the platoon in which Petunya , Colosseum and Prokopenko himself, then in the post of grenade launchers, participated. Shortly after they joined this platoonDrozak and his friend Mokry . On July 17, 2014 there was a resupply, with the incorporation of newcomers that allowed them to gradually consolidate their own platoon.

In a recent statement , Buba recalls that, in his period of service, he was commander of Prokopenko and praises the one who would end up being commander of the Regiment: “ Redis started out as an ordinary soldier, but he has such a character that he was constantly successful in his service. He became a squad leader, then a platoon, company, and regimental commander. He ran his entire career from him." Redis and Buba participated together, along with Zhorin and others, in the victories of the first Azov in Mariupol and Marinka, and also in defeats such as Ilovaisk.

The link between Prokopenko and Korenok ( Buba ) is, however, much deeper than that associated with belonging to Azov and Borodach. It is much earlier, actually to the period of the Men in Black and Azov, and dates back to his membership in the ultras sector of Dynamo kyiv. In the reference interview, Buba points out that, as supporters of Dynamo kyiv, they traveled throughout Ukraine with the team for many years and, in this context, forged a close friendship that has lasted for more than thirteen years. Buba shows the role of the radical ultras of the world of football in the history of Azov: “When our boys from the ultras went to fight, they knew that the commander was Redis, and that he was from the soccer field. It was easier for them to go together with one of their own and they had more confidence in him. Redis understood them, his courage, and so they complemented each other. Therefore, at the beginning of the service, it was easier for everyone. Then the military business took its toll. We see the heroism and exploits not only of Redis, but also of all the guys who were associated with various Ukrainian ultra teams ."

Buba 's disabling injury would be significant not only for Zhorin , soon to be promoted to company and regimental officer in Azov, but also for Redis . Prokopenko reaches the position of commander of the First Company of the First Century (or Company) of the Regiment, based mainly on the Borodach Division of Mose , Buba and Cartman . Buba 's serious injury and Mose 's decision to accompany him in his early days in hospital leave Redis free to take over the company and de facto, given the weak leadership of Mikhailenko, from Azov.

Following Maksim Zhorin's resignation from the position of Regiment Officer, which he held between 2016 and 2017, Redis finally became the general commander of the Azov Regiment in the fall of 2017. As can be seen, this promotion mechanism from the first company of the Eastern Azov Battalion, based in Mariupol, would be relevant again in 2022.

It is important to note that, together with Buba and Mose (who holds the actual leadership of the Azov military structure, or at least Borodach, after Buba 's injury ), Prokopenko follows a shared path with them: the Men in Black, Borodach and the progressive configuration of the internal structures of the Battalion and the Azov Regiment. Without rupture and in accordance with a dynamic of military learning that goes from practice to theory: “Well, of course, our main priority is to build an army of a new kind. Now we have the opportunity to work with tactical tank groups, supported by armored vehicles and artillery. Little by little we began to master the military business, we started with practice, not theory, which at the same time let us down during combat operations, ”says Redis in his 2015 interview.

From the moment of his accession to the command of the Regiment, but especially since the start of the siege of Mariupol in 2022, Prokopenko has had the opportunity to apply, albeit unsuccessfully in Azovstal, his basic belief that Azov and Ukraine were " strong enough". to take back our land with blood…and not go [get] some handouts from Russia. We do not need as a gift lands that already belong to us… we must defend our land, and in any case we have no right to give up Donbass .” Redis, however, has been consistent with the demands of the eternal struggle to which he decided to dedicate his life, including the intention of building a new army in Azov: “ At least as long as Azov needs me, I will be here”. And so it was until his surrender at Azovstal.

Nikita Nadtochy

After the surrender of Azovstal, around June 18, 2022, there is a relief in the Azov command. Pending the possible return of Prokopenko, Nikita Nadtochi is thus temporarily appointed commander of the Azov Regiment.

Known primarily by his nom de guerre, Raz-dva , Nadtochi held a prominent role in the Azov military hierarchy. Specifically, he was commander of one of the two battalions into which Azov is currently structured, precisely the one located in Mariupol, the central deployment point for the ultra-nationalist formation (2nd Azov Battalion). He had reached that post in November 2021, with a ceremony handing over the Azov flag to Nadtochi at the Urzuf garrison, presided over by Denis Prokopenko. He had previously held similar positions, for example the commander of the 3rd company of the 1st Battalion of the Regiment, a company that was deployed to Odessa in 2016. According to some sources, such as Radio Svoboda, Nadtochi would have been serving on the front lines since 2014.

During the tenure of the previous commander, Akula , the 2nd Urzuf Battalion grew significantly to several hundred soldiers, including foreign trainers (British, Russian and a Croat).

Nadtochi's appointment shows the hierarchical continuity that has been imposed from the beginning in Azov. As in the case of Redis , and following the Azov tradition in recent years, the command of the Regiment is taken over by the person in command of the first company, or company, of the Battalion stationed in Donbass.

There is no evidence that Raz-Dva is linked to the Borodach structure, but it is clear that his rise to power is linked to the power groups linked to that structure, groups to which both Prokopenko and Zhorin are linked.

According to Nadtochi, he would have received a direct message from Prokopenko in which he asked for the assumption of command of the Regiment ( Until I return , according to the note received). But it cannot be forgotten that Zhorin's role is again key in the transmission of power. He is precisely the one in charge of transmitting the information about Nadtochi's appointment to the press. And on June 22 he posts this joint photo, with Nadtochi, on his personal Telegram channel.

Image

Zhorin has also been the main organizer of the extraction of relevant members of the Ukrainian military defense structure in Azovstal. Among the main soldiers rescued through these helicopter extraction operations, as well as the provision of supplies to the Mariupol steelworks, are some key figures of the Azov structure, such as the Georgian trainer Giorgi Kuparashvili and Nadtochi himself. Seriously injured at the end of March, Raz-Dvahe was one of the first wounded transferred from Mariupol to the government area. He left Azovstal on March 21. The fact that Ukraine has resolutely supported Zhorin in this objective, including sending in rescue helicopters personnel from the country's military intelligence, is a good example of the importance Ukraine attributes to Azov. These missions were only partially successful, and several of the helicopters sent by Ukraine to rescue Azov commanders and other Ukrainian Army units besieged in Azovstal were shot down by Russian and Republican air defenses.

Nadtochi therefore constitutes a key character in the perspective of the current Azov structures. And in fact, as Zhorin points out, Nadtochi has the important mission of assembling and preparing a new Azov regiment to continue the combat missions that the former 2nd Azov Battalion, defeated at Mariupol, will no longer be able to carry out. As shown by the creation of new Azov units in Kharkov, both special operations integrated into the armed forces (such as the recently created SSO Azov Kharkov) and paramilitary territorial forces (such as the Kraken Azov), the strategy of expanding military power and Azov paramilitary constitutes a clear objective of Zhorin and the National Corpus.

Zhorin's role must also be valued politically. Not only because he currently represents the main operational media reference in Azov, but also because no one embodies better than him the structural continuity between the fanatical men in black sympathizers of the European extreme right of the 30s and 40s and the nationalism allied to the Konovalets and Bandera, the brotherhood of the paramilitary vocation of the Borodach Division and the organized and, for a long time, official structure of the Azov Regiment.

Zhorin not only embodies this continuity but also the political-military dimension of the movement, a de facto part of the structure that includes the Corpus Nacional party, in which he is also a part of its leading nucleus. Since January 2020, Maksim Zhorin, Mose , thus holds the position of Chief of the Central General Staff of the National Corpus, still nominally under the command of Andriy Biletsky.

Epilogue: Azov, Ukraine and its National Order

There is no doubt that the leaders of the Azov movement constitute some of the main spokespersons for the new Ukrainian national order, with a strategy that, as occurred with the national and social project of Spanish Falangism, focuses on achieving a united and orderly Ukrainian nation, without any contamination from the Russian world and with international weight, led by a strong leader and army. His election certainly involves sharing European prosperity, but above all imposing the national order to which they aspire, as well as consolidating the force (police, military and judicial) capable of guaranteeing it against internal and external enemies.

In the presentation of the National Militia-Druzhina, intended to impose national order on the streets that the state was unable to develop, in the style of any vigilante paramilitary force, similar to the one in which he participated in 2014, Vlad Korenko pointed out the following in February 2018: “ Now our front is the streets of Ukrainian cities. We take responsibility to ensure that neither internal enemies, such as separatist pigs, nor anti-social elements (drug dealers, alcoholics, etc.) dare to threaten ordinary Ukrainian citizens. We are not pacifists, we frankly say that whoever breaks the law and threatens the safety of people will face the iron fist of the vanguard of Ukrainian nationalism! ”.

What the application of these theses means could be verified on March 12, 2020 in the presentation of the National Platform for Unity and Reconciliation by Sergei Sivojo, a Platform that sought a rapprochement of Ukraine with the population of the occupied territories . As chronicles of that act point out, it was boycotted by veterans of the National Corps who took the floor to declare that peace with Russia was impossible and ended up harassing Sivokho. At the head of the mafia action was Maksim Zhorin.

With this type of action, Zhorin returned to the "preventive talks" that gave so much success, in cities like Kharkiv, to the Men in Black of militant fascism.

In fact, since his time in Kharkov as part of the Men in Black, the fight between Zhorin and his comrades has continued, unchanged and without any kind of break.

In a 2018 article on his blog , Ukrainian journalist Oleksiy Bratushchak included a photo of Vlad Korenko on Facebook, no longer available today. With his back to the camera, Korenko wears a basketball jersey with the number 88. On his right arm is a tattoo that appears to represent the emblem of the Borodach Division.

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/07/31/azov- ... del-poder/

Google Translator

*****

Zelensky Orders Evacuation From Donetsk Over Russian Advance

Image
Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelensky announces mandatory evacuation from Donetsk region. | Photo: Twitter @AnetteJrgensen3

Published 31 July 2022

Ukrainian President Volodymir Zelensky on Saturday in his daily address called on all remaining residents and servicemen in the region of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic to urgently evacuate the area.

"A government decision was made on the mandatory evacuation of the Donetsk region," located in the Donbas (eastern Ukraine), the head of state has said. "Please evacuate," Zelensky stressed.

The Ukrainian president assured that the authorities are taking care of logistics and support operations "from A to Z" and will do everything possible to save the maximum number of human lives and limit the damage in the area.

Image

Zelensky has called on Ukrainians who have the opportunity to talk to "those who still remain in the combat zones in Donbas" to convince their compatriots that it is necessary to leave.

In another part of his speech, Zelensky accused Russia of an attack on Friday on a prison in the Donetsk locality of Yelenovka, which killed more than 50 Ukrainian prisoners.

The president made this statement despite the fact that Moscow had accused Kiev of having carried out the attack, presumably with American HIMARS multiple rocket launchers.

In a statement issued on Sunday, the Russian Defense Ministry has officially invited independent experts from the United Nations (UN) and the Red Cross to conduct an "objective investigation" into the shelling of the Yelenovka detention center by the Ukrainian Army.

Russia launched its military operation on February 24. In recent weeks, the Donetsk region, has become the epicenter of fighting between the Ukrainian Army and Russian allied forces.

Kiev's Western partners make no secret of their activities to equip Ukrainian extremists with more weapons to thwart the Russian mission seeking the "demilitarization" and "denazification" of the Slavic country.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Zel ... -0002.html

*****

Ukraine launches banned anti-personnel mines against Donetsk

Image
The mayor of Donetsk has recommended that the population not go out at night due to the imminent danger of coming into contact with a mine and causing it to explode, as they are almost imperceptible. | Photo: Telegram @kulemzin_donetsk
Published July 31, 2022 (6 hours 18 minutes ago)

Previously, last Wednesday, a similar attack with small PFM-1 landmines had been reported in the northern part of said city.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces launched numerous PFM-1 anti-personnel landmines against populated neighborhoods in the city of Donetsk on Saturday, which are internationally prohibited.

Local media detail that these mines were found in several streets of the city, for which the center of Donetsk was closed so that the sappers can carry out their work in these areas.

Regarding the mines, they detailed that they fall to the ground without exploding and explode on contact, in addition to having been launched by multiple rocket launcher systems.

As a result of its detonation at least two cars were damaged; and it is unknown if such incidents left any human casualties.

In this sense, the mayor of Donetsk, Alexei Kulemzin, asked residents not to go out into the street at night because "the mines are practically invisible."

"A team of pyrotechnicians and rescuers have been on the scene since early in the morning," Kulemzin said, while urging local residents to exercise extreme care; and do not pick up or approach unknown objects.

The small butterfly-shaped PFM-1 landmines are prohibited by the 1997 Ottawa Convention, to which Ukraine is a party. Previously, last Wednesday from the Donetsk People's Republic itself, the discovery of these mines in several streets in the northwestern part of the city had been reported.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/ucrania- ... -0002.html

Russia invites UN and Red Cross to investigate bombing in Donbass

Image
The attack perpetrated by Ukrainian forces took place last Friday, where the victims were treated by Russian health personnel, for the time being the seriously injured remain in health centers. | Photo: RT
Published July 30, 2022 (10 hours 14 minutes ago)

Russia makes the invitation in order to carry out an objective investigation of the facts

The Russian Ministry of Defense invited this Saturday the United Nations Organization (UN) and the International Red Cross to investigate the bombing that occurred in the Yelénovka detention center, located in Donbass.

According to the Russian portfolio, the invitation is issued for both the Red Cross and the UN to send experts on the subject to investigate what happened in the detention center, where at least 50 Ukrainian prisoners perished and 73 were injured.

At the same time, the Russian authority highlights in its statement that the invitation is made in order to carry out an objective investigation of the facts, which is free of manipulation and distortion.

"As a result of a deliberate attack on July 29 with HIMARS rockets on a remand prison near the town of Yelenovka, the kyiv regime killed and maimed most of the 193 Ukrainian prisoners of war held there," explained the spokesman for the Russian Ministry of Defense, Igor Konashénkov.

The attack perpetrated by Ukrainian forces took place last Friday, where the victims were treated by Russian health personnel, for the time being the seriously injured remain in health centers.

"The political, criminal and moral responsibility for the carnage against the Ukrainians falls personally on the President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky, his criminal regime and Washington, which supports them," Konashenkov said.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-on ... -0022.html

Google Translator
.
******

Siemens Has Not Repaired Nord Stream 1 Turbine, Says Gazprom
ORINOCOTRIBUNE JULY 30, 2022

Image
Pipes of the gas storage plant Reckrod, part of Nord Stream 1, near Eiterfeld, central Germany, photographed on July 14, 2022. Photo: Michael Probst/AP.

Russian gas giant Gazprom announced on Wednesday, July 27, that German manufacturing multinational Siemens failed to meet its obligations and has not returned a repaired turbine engine for the Nord Stream 1 pipeline.

“In May we expected to receive a repaired engine from Siemens, but to date we have not received that engine,” Vitaly Markelov, vice president of the Management Committee of Gazprom, told Russian media.

“There are still open questions regarding the risks of sanctions, which may be preventing the return of this gas turbine engine to Russia, and the transport of other engines for repair,” he added.

According to Markelov, there are still problems with unrepaired engines at the compressor station, and “Siemens is not working to get rid of these problems.”

He explained that normally six gas pumping units are used at the compressor station, but now only one engine is in operation and the rest are not working due to technical problems.

He added that Gazprom never had any problem with repairing the engines before the imposition of US and European sanctions against Russia.

https://orinocotribune.com/siemens-has- ... s-gazprom/

Lessons From Vietnam for Ukraine
RICK STERLING JULY 30, 2022

Image
Photo composition showing Ho Chi Ming, the scene of the helicopter on top of the US embassy in Hanoi evacuating diplomatic personnel, soldiers, helicopters along with the Vietnamese or Ukrainian flag. Photo: thevietnamese.org.


By Rick Sterling – Jul 27, 2022

In April 1965, U.S. President Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ) explained why he was escalating US involvement in Vietnam. With an Orwellian touch, LBJ titled the speech “Peace without Conquest” as he announced the beginning of US air attacks on Vietnam. He explained that “We must fight if we are to live in a world where every country can shape its own destiny and only in such a world will our own freedom be secure… we have made a national pledge to help South Vietnam defend its independence and I intend to keep that promise. To dishonor that pledge, to abandon the small and brave nation to its enemies and the terror must follow would be an unforgivable wrong.”

Johnson further explained, ”We are also there to strengthen world order… To leave Vietnam to its fate would shake the confidence of all these people in the value of an American commitment and in the value of America’s words.”

Learning no lessons from the failure and mass slaughter of the Korean War in the previous decade, the US military commenced widespread bombing of Vietnam and sent hundreds of thousands of soldiers.

At the time, spring 1965, about 400 US soldiers had died in the conflict. The war was not yet widely unpopular. Americans who protested against the Vietnam War were a small minority. It would be two years before Martin Luther King’s famous denunciation of the war.

Years later, after hundreds of thousands had been drafted into the military with the deaths of tens of thousands, the war became widely unpopular. Ultimately, over 58,000 Americans and three million Vietnamese civilians and soldiers died in the war. The cost in human lives and wasted resources was immense. The “Great Society” that LBJ hoped to build was stopped by the diversion of human lives, energy and resources into the Vietnam War.

There are similarities today with the US and NATO pouring tens of BILLIONS of dollars in weapons into Ukraine to counter the Russian military intervention. The US and western allies are providing additional support in intelligence and military advice. While there are not yet official US troops (as there were not in Vietnam for the first years), there are special operations and much other military support.

President Biden and administration leaders sound similar to LBJ in the early stage of the Vietnam War. In his remarks to Congress asking for additional funding for Ukraine, Biden said, “We need this bill to support Ukraine in its fight for freedom…. The cost of this fight is not cheap, but caving to aggression is going to be more costly if we allow it to happen.” Making clear that the US goal is not just the “freedom” of Ukraine, Biden continues, “Investing in Ukraine’s freedom and security is a small price to pay to punish Russian aggression, to lessen the risk of future conflicts.”

In both Vietnam and Ukraine, the US installed or promoted pro-US governments to counter “adversary” nations. In the 1950’s, the US prevented a nation-wide referendum in Vietnam which would have united the country without a war. In 2014, the US was instrumental in promoting the Ukraine coup which overthrew a democratically elected government leading to the secession of Crimea and civil war in eastern Ukraine. While most in the West think the Ukraine conflict began in February this year, it actually began in February 2014. The 2016 documentary “Ukraine on Fire”, banned by YouTube, describes the coup.

Western media portrayed the US and South Vietnam winning the war in South East Asia until the 1968 Tet offensive exposed the lies and reality. Similarly, western media portrays Ukrainians winning the war amidst overwhelming Ukrainian public support. In reality, Russia and the secessionist Donetsk Peoples Republic (DPR) and Lugansk Peoples Republic (LPR) have steadily taken control of south east Ukraine. Meanwhile, Ukrainian president Zelensky has overseen the the imprisonment, torture and killing of opponents. The largest opposition party has been banned. Many Ukrainians oppose his policy and continuation of the war. There are rumors of presidential assassination attempts, just as there were in South Vietnam.

Ukrainians have become cannon fodder for the US geopolitical goals, just as the South Vietnamese were.

It is now clear that LBJ’s escalation in 1965 was a huge and costly mistake. The needless war did immense damage to Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. It also had enormous negative ramifications in the United States.

Will the US and allies continue to escalate the conflict in Ukraine, to “double down” on an intervention halfway around the world with the goal of hurting Russia? Have we learned nothing from Vietnam and subsequent US/Western foreign policy disasters of the past 40 years?

https://orinocotribune.com/lessons-from ... r-ukraine/

****

What the U.S. Government and The New York Times Have Quietly Agreed Not to Tell You About Ukraine
By Evan Reif - July 29, 2022 4

Image
Dmytro Yarosh [Source: kyivpost.com]

“I wonder how it came to pass that most of the billionaires in Ukraine are Jews?”—Dmytro Yarosh, former People’s Deputy of Ukraine

Part III in series on Ukranian fascism. See Part 1 and Part 2.


In the West, the 2022 war has often been portrayed as a struggle between autocracy and democracy. The Ukrainians are the ones standing on the side of freedom, infuriating Vladimir Putin, who cannot tolerate a shining beacon of democracy in his backyard.

Indeed, some journalists and pundits even claim that Ukrainian democracy is why Putin invaded, fearing that the Russian people would follow Ukraine’s alleged example and throw him out.

But this narrative—no matter how beloved by U.S. corporate media or endlessly repeated by the State Department—is a fantasy. History has shown us that the Ukrainian government’s commitment to democracy is dubious or non-existent. Ukraine currently has more banned political parties than legal ones; political repression and imprisonment of dissidents has been commonplace ever since its independence; and both the government and its affiliated party militias routinely resort to violence to quell peaceful protests while turning a blind eye to violence inflicted on Jews and other racial and ethnic minorities.

Image
Logo of KUN’s armed wing “Tryzub.” [Source: upload.wikimedia.org]

The fall of the Soviet Union and the Communist Bloc in 1991 was supposed to usher in a great new era of history—“the end of history,” as Francis Fukuyama proclaimed. Unfortunately, however, it provided an opportunity for the old gladiators, or fascist network in the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), a paramilitary movement headed by the anti-Semitic, fascist, Nazi collaborator and war criminal Stepan Bandera, to complete the job they had spent seven decades preparing for.

In other words, the collapse of the Soviet Union represented for them an opportunity to start a new war—the first being World War II and the Cold War—and to seize power finally and implement their vision.

Starting in 2004 with the Orange Revolution, Ukrainian society has been embroiled in a nearly two-decade long era of chaos and bloodshed, the grisly results of which we see in the current war. Slava Stetsko’s CIA-backed Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists (KUN) was there for all of it, starting from the street protests in 2004 to the Maidan coup in 2014 and the bloody repression of the Donbas which followed.

Ukrainian Democracy

Image
Maidan protesters attacking police, 2014 [Source: theguardian.com]

The first efforts from Leonid Kuchma and Leonid Kravchuk mostly involved the repression of the Communist Party of Ukraine, which was the largest and most successful party in Ukraine during the 1990s.

The Communists won elections in 1994 (the first they contested after their ban was overturned) and again in a very decisive manner in 1998. Despite this, Kuchma and Kravchuk succeeded at keeping the Communists out of power, drawing on help from both Yeltsin’s Russia and NATO.

After the fall of the USSR, the newly independent Ukraine lacked a constitution until 1996. As the Communists held a majority in parliament, they were able to mount a substantial resistance to Kuchma and Kravchuk’s proposed constitutions. The Communists mostly demanded the continuance of Soviet-era social and welfare programs, along with jobs guarantees as Ukrainian state industry fell into the hands of gangster “oligarchs.”

The Communists held the line ideologically and were steadily gaining strength, so Kuchma finally resorted to dirty tricks. He expelled the Communists from the debate and forced more than 6,000 changes to their proposed constitution before ratifying a deal under the threat of dissolution of Parliament, as Yeltsin had done.

Image
Leonid Kuchma with Volodymyr Zelensky, 2020. [Source: president.gov.ua]

Even this was not enough to put down the Communists. In the 1999 presidential election, facing certain defeat, Kuchma had to resort to outright ballot stuffing to retain power, according to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) observation mission. In 2000, Kuchma helped to finally put a dagger into the heart of the KPU after he helped convince factions of the party to split, siphoning off votes and preventing the Communists from reaching critical mass in the future.

The far right did not face the same sort of repression. Despite both Kravchuk and Kuchma looting the country after enacting a Yeltsin-style mass privatization program, they enjoyed widespread support among the far right. It was only when Leonid Kuchma was caught on tape ordering the murder of Georgiy Gongadze, a former right-wing terrorist and founder of Ukrayinska Pravda that the dam broke, and the rightists turned against the state.

The group Gongadze was a member of, the UNA-UNSO, was founded by Yurii Shukhevych, son of the infamous genocidaire Roman Shukhevych. They would later go on to be a founding member of the infamous neo-fascist alliance Right Sector along with Slava Stetsko’s KUN.

Image
“Ukraine Without Kuchma” protests of February 6, 2001. [Source: wikimedia.org]

The resulting protest movement, called “Ukraine Without Kuchma,” was spearheaded by the far right and represented their first real dissent in post-Soviet Ukraine. The movement mostly limited itself to street protests and political pressure, but Kuchma’s deep unpopularity led to the movement spreading throughout the country.

Kuchma was term-limited and did not try to force the issue, fearing a critical mass of dissent. Instead, he put forward his Prime Minister and political protégé Viktor Yanukovych to run in his stead. The opposition viewed this as little more than a cynical attempt for Kuchma to continue his rule in all but name.

Image
Viktor Yanukovych, 2010. [Source: britannica.com]

Yanukovych’s primary challenger was Viktor Yushchenko, a bank administrator turned prime minister who had become the leader and public face of the anti-Kuchma movement. Kuchma was so widely unpopular that Yushchenko was able to build a broad coalition party called “Our Ukraine,” eventually winning a plurality in 2002. The KUN took a prominent role in this new coalition, with Slava Stetsko listed third on Yushchenko’s party list prior to her death.

Image
Viktor Yushchenko [Source: Mirror.co.uk]

The stage was set for the highly contested 2004 presidential elections, which set in motion many of the events that would lead to the current war.

The Orange Revolution

“It’s time to bury the war hatchet and to forget where it lies”- Viktor Yushchenko

From this chaos, the election of 2004 gave birth to the Orange Revolution. It cannot be fairly called a nationalist movement, but it was a movement in which nationalists wielded most of the real power. The reality is that the government of Leonid Kuchma was corrupt, brutal, avaricious, and widely loathed by Ukrainians of all stripes.

Widespread dissent against Kuchma often led to strange bedfellows. While nationalists like KUN provided much of the muscle, the Communists had their own grievances with Kuchma and supported the movement initially. The KPU of 2004 was diminished but still a formidable force in Ukrainian politics, and it lent both numbers and credibility to the opposition.

Dissent would only grow when, in September 2004, Yushchenko was poisoned with Dioxin, resulting in his hospitalization and permanent disfigurement. While the perpetrators have never been caught, most of the opposition believed the Kuchma government was responsible.

As for Yushchenko’s politics, he was lavishly funded by the United States and favored entry into NATO as quickly as possible. Under this cloak of neo-liberal respectability, Yushchenko was also a staunch nationalist.

After his victory, Yushchenko embarked on a full rehabilitation of the Nazi collaborator OUN, which had been active participants in the Holocaust. Streets and cities were renamed, monuments to the fascist killers were erected throughout the country, and Yushchenko awarded hero of Ukraine to the infamous OUN commanders Stepan Bandera and even Roman Shukhevych, who once murdered 8,000 Poles in a single day, to widespread condemnation both at home and abroad.

Image
Monument to Stepan Bandera in Ivano-Frankivsk [Source: genocidecoursemsu.files.wordpress.com]

Initially, Yanukovych was victorious in the 2004 election, winning by a narrow margin in the runoff. The victory was widely seen as fraudulent with exit polls suggesting a Yushchenko victory and in response the opposition mobilized massive protests throughout Ukraine in what was dubbed the “Orange Revolution,” with Orange being the color of Yushchenko’s political party.

As many as 500,000 protesters took to the streets against the government with marches, strikes and rallies gripping the nation for about three months. Major oligarchs such as Petro Poroshenko and Yulia Tymoshenko supported the movement, leaving the government with few allies. Kuchma, once more fearing a revolution, withdrew his support of Yanukovych and the Ukrainian constitutional court annulled the election, ordering a re-vote on the 26th of December.

Image
Orange Revolution protesters in 2004. [Source: atlanticcouncil.org]

NATO was not idle in this revolution. Neither the U.S. nor the EU accepted the results of the first election, and the U.S. publicly supported Yushchenko. Publicly, the ABN-affiliated John McCain visited Kyiv alongside Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Hillary Clinton went so far as to nominate both Yushchenko and future Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili for the Nobel Peace Prize. Privately, the U.S. provided both enormous financial and technical support to their chosen candidates.

Image
Hillary Clinton and Mikheil Saakashvili [Source: rferl.org]

Image
John McCain and Viktor Yushchenko [Source: spokesman.com]

The second time around, Yushchenko won the election outright with a comfortable margin and the Orange Revolution took power in Ukraine.

Winning is not the same as governing, however, and Yushchenko’s coalition remained dangerously unstable. Political infighting characterized Yushchenko’s administration, with Tymoshenko often making plays for power before breaking entirely with Yushchenko.

The need to maintain a slim majority in Parliament grew so desperate that Yushchenko even brought the Communists into the coalition in 2007. This led to a right-wing revolt inside the party, leaving it with much less support than it started with. In the end, Yushchenko was not able to accomplish much and was eventually eclipsed by PM Yulia Tymoshenko.

Outside of the Rada, Yushchenko’s situation was much worse. The 2008 financial crisis absolutely devastated Ukraine. Russia cut gas supplies in 2009, the culmination of a long-running feud over gas debts and alleged theft. These two wounds collapsed the Ukrainian economy. Unemployment tripled, industrial output fell dramatically, and many large banks failed. Yushchenko’s popularity plunged in the aftermath.

By the time of the 2010 presidential election Yushchenko was so unpopular that he fell to fifth place with just 5% of the vote.

Viktor Yanukovych and his “Party of Regions,” on the other hand, capitalized on the chaos and incompetence of the Yushchenko administration and emerged victorious from the election which international observers certified as free and fair.

The ultimate failure of the Orange Revolution was a learning experience for the nationalists. They would not repeat the same mistake—leaving their fate to the whims of voters—next time.

The Gladius Unsheathed

“The historic mission of our nation in this critical moment is to lead the White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival, a crusade against the Semite-led Untermenschen.” –Andriy Biletsky, Maidan activist and founder of Azov.

Yanukovych’s victory did little to calm the political situation in Ukraine. The nationalists were defeated, but by no means destroyed and the notoriously slippery Tymoshenko remained a potent political force. The 2010 race was close, with Tymoshenko receiving around 45% support to Yanukovych’s 48%, and her political party was the second largest in parliament.

While the drama continued in the Rada, Ukraine remained poor, corrupt, and deeply divided. Yanukovych made concessions to nationalists and moved toward closer ties with the EU. In 2014, the IMF asked Ukraine to dramatically raise taxes on essential goods and services while freezing wages and cutting social safety nets. The government refused these demands estimating that they could lead to the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs.

It was this refusal that officially sparked the Euromaidan protests.

Initially small and peaceful, the Maidan grew rapidly and became more aggressive as time went on. The first mass movements took place on the 24th of November, and with them the first violence between police and protesters. Protesters charged police lines and, at midnight, special police squads unsuccessfully raided protest camps.

Fighting between the two sides only escalated, and on November 30th, the police attempted their largest raid yet. Police with clubs battled protesters. When the dust cleared, 80 had been injured, including 7 police officers, and 30 had been arrested. Among the injured were several Polish citizens.

The next day, fighting began in earnest. The so-called “Black Committees,” an alliance of far-right forces, used a forklift to break through police lines. Armed with hammers, chains and Molotov cocktails, they attacked police, seized the Kyiv city administration building and attacked the trade unions building. Among the Black Committees were Right Sector and Patriot of Ukraine, the group which would later become Azov. Despite initial claims of police provocation, the Black Committees would later claim responsibility for the attacks, in which hundreds were injured on both sides.

Image
Black Committee fighter attacking police, December 1, 2013. Source: vesti.ua]

Fighting intensified from here, spreading nationwide, and the Black Committees coalesced into a more organized form, known as Maidan Self-Defense squads. Despite the benign name, these aggressive and violent armed groups gradually increased in both size and ambition and were able to overcome police in many areas, helped by ever-increasing police collaboration.

It was at this time that the monsters of the past crawled out from their lairs. The Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists, the direct descendants of CIA collaborator and Holocaust perpetrator Yaroslav Stetsko’s ABN, were heavily represented in these so-called “self-defense” forces.

Harkening back to the monstrous atrocities of their OUN forefathers, extreme brutality and attacks on leftists were calling cards of the Maidan “self-defense” forces. The most infamous example was seen in Odessa on May 5, 2014, in a night of violence that would have made Roman Shukhevych proud.

After cornering anti-fascist activists inside the Odessa Unions Building, Maidan “self-defense” forces pelted the building with Molotov cocktails, burning many of those hiding inside.

Image
[Source: alfavita.gr]

This woman was found naked from the waist down and burned. It is likely that she was raped, doused with gasoline, and burned alive by Maidan “self-defense” squads. After the fires went out, Maidan forces attacked the building. Much as their forefathers had done in Volyna, the fascists butchered survivors with hammers, axes and garrotes.

Image
[Source: pantv.livejournal.com]

This pregnant woman was also among those murdered. She had come in to water the plants on her day off and was trapped inside by the attack. She was strangled to death with an electrical cord, a technique so common that the fascists named it the “Banderite garotte.” According to eyewitnesses, she resisted for some time, as her screams could be heard from the square below.

The charred and brutalized remains of 48 civilians were found inside the Odessa House of Trade Unions. None of the fascists responsible for these atrocities ever faced charges but were, instead, lauded by the state and media. Similar attacks occurred throughout Ukraine.

Image
Rada Deputy Iryna Farion applauding the Odessa massacre. Machine-translated image. [Source: russianfilesuniverse.wordpress.com]

On February 20, 2014, snipers opened fire on the crowd from the Kyiv Philharmonic Building, which had been occupied by Maidan forces the night prior. 67 died and hundreds were wounded, with casualties on both sides. Maidan forces blamed Yanukovych, while Western intelligence suspected it to be a Maidan provocation.

Images of the bodies served to further swell Maidan forces across the country and, fearing a final collapse of his government, the beleaguered Yanukovych attempted a peace treaty with Maidan forces the next day. Right Sector refused to negotiate, however, and the fairly elected Yanukovych fled the country soon after. The Maidan was victorious, and a new government was quickly formed.

Maidan victory in Kiev did not mean Maidan victory in Ukraine, however. Maidan forces would find victory in the east far more elusive.

The Eastern Front

“I’m not a hero. My people are heroes. The ones who are on the front lines. I’m just their commander” -Mikhail “Givi” Tolstykh, commander of the 1st Separate Tank Battalion “Somalia.”

As the coup raged in the west, the Russian-speaking heart of Yanukovych’s support in eastern Ukraine looked on in terror. Maidan forces had spread rapidly throughout the country, and with the collapse of the government, Russian-speaking cities like Odessa burned.

While government structures broke down, police protection grew increasingly unreliable. With no pay and no clear leadership, much of Ukraine’s police force simply evaporated, unwilling to risk their lives for a government which no longer existed. The rest were forced to pick sides. Some joined with Kyiv, others stayed in their communities. Those who stayed were rapidly overwhelmed as the Maidan forces made the transition from Werwolf to Wehrmacht.

Image
Badge of 5th Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade “OPLOT.” [Source: wikimedia.org]

In response, various militias, self-defense, and paramilitary units arose from the east. At first the militias were often all that stood between the people of Donbas and the axes, hammers, and Molotov cocktails of the Maidan regime’s killers.

Starting out ad-hoc and lightly armed, the militias came from groups as diverse as soccer hooligans, Marxists, ex-MMA fighters, Russian Orthodox extremists, right-wing nationalists and more. They grew rapidly in both size and sophistication; many went on to become the basis of the current L/DPR military. Fighting only intensified, and in many parts of the country, the situation was descending into full civil war.

At first, the Army could provide little support to either side. As command and control broke down, units were left isolated and uncertain about what was happening. Yanukovych had mostly avoided using the army to suppress the Maidan, and by this stage, years of corruption and neglect meant cupboards were bare.

As the new regime consolidated its power, it set about restoring order. The man appointed to the job was crime boss turned interior minister Arsen Avakov. Despite his life of crime, Avakov was a veteran politician by this time. As regional administrator of Kharkiv prior to Maidan, he ruled with an iron fist with the help of Andriy Biletsky, the neo-Nazi founder of Azov and Patriot of Ukraine.

Biletsky commanded a group of soccer hooligans, turning them into a formidable street-fighting force ready to carry out Avakov’s bloody diktats. Attacks on migrant workers and Romani were particularly widespread. When the Maidan happened, Avakov pulled strings to free his friend Biletsky from prison, and he was an active participant in the Maidan coup.

Avakov’s new ministry contained not only Biletsky and his “Patriot of Ukraine,” but also representatives from the CIA-affiliated neo-Nazi Right Sector and Maidan Self-Defense.

Image
Arsen Avakov [Source: Wikidata.org]

He faced a daunting task. The new Kyiv regime was falling apart, with democratically elected deputies in Kharkiv and elsewhere declaring independence. Avakov began the transfer of police bases and equipment to Right Sector forces, considerably bolstering their strength. Right Sector and other far-right groups began taking control of settlements, through threats when possible, and violence when necessary.

In Irpin, masked Right Sector activists threatened to murder the democratically elected representatives if they did not join the Kyiv regime.

“They shouted, they threatened us: If you do not raise your hand, we will cut off your hand, we will be at your home, we will deal with your families, with your property,”-Olga Oliynich, Irpin City Council member.

Still, this was not enough. The Donbas militias were digging in, and so Avakov escalated, attempting to mobilize the army. This very nearly doomed the Kyiv regime, as the rank-and-file soldiers revolted.

Rather than shoot their friends, relatives, and neighbors in eastern Ukraine, they went home. Roughly 70% of the Ukrainian army deserted or outright defected, with many of those passing their weapons and equipment down to the Donbas militias, or even joining the militias.

Now faced with the very real threat of a counter-revolution destroying his new regime, Avakov went back to the bag of tricks that had served him so well during his warlord-like rule of Kharkiv.

On April 15, 2015, Avakov founded the Special Tasks Patrol police, deputizing groups such as Biletsky’s Patriot of Ukraine and the Stetsko family’s CIA killers in the KUN. The new organization expanded rapidly, eventually encompassing 56 units drawn from the now vast ranks of neo-Nazi militias inside Ukraine.

Image [Source: Facebook.com]

Image
[Source: wikimedia.org]
Much as their ancestors in the 1940s, the STPs are reprisal battalions. They cut a bloody swath through the Donbas, terrorizing the locals with the same elan as their forefathers in Nachtigal. They embarked on a campaign of torture, murder, rape (including raping children and the disabled), illegal detention, political repression, armed robbery, arson and more.

These units are still in operation, actively fighting against Russian forces today.

Very few of those responsible have ever faced consequences. Of those who have, most have now been released. An example would be the infamous “Tornado” unit of the STP. Accused, tried and convicted of crimes as ghastly as raping babies, evidence was so strong that even the Kyiv regime could not ignore it, and unit members languished in prison until released by the Zelensky regime.

Image
Danyial al-Takbir, callsign “Mujahid” Source: New Cold War

Today, men like Danyial al-Takbir, a neo-Nazi, former ISIS member and convicted mass murderer, rapist (several of his victims were raped until dead) and arsonist stand at the vanguard of a war planned for seven decades. This is the true legacy of the OUN, from its roots as Holocaust perpetrators and CIA assassins to its return as the butchers of Donbas.

The crimes of these units are vast enough to fill books. I cannot possibly catalog them all. Rather, I will leave you with the testimony of Lydia Bolbat, a former Tornado collaborator:

“Several times I have found myself in a situation where you give help to the military and start praying to God in order to be able to leave their place alive and well. It turns out ‌I was not touched only because, according to some ‘thieves laws,’ the hand of the giver is not cut off. Shall I tell you how a dozen soldiers kidnapped a young girl and raped her during 10 days before the child died? Shall I tell how armed people came to the establishments of Mariupol and put a gun to the head of the owner, forcing them to feed them? And then for a month they every day had their parties there. How they slowed down every passing car on the roads and took a tribute from people. How did they participate in raiding operations? How did they keep people in basements and beat them, demanding money? The ugly truth? Nasty, isn’t it? But it was like that!”

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/0 ... t-ukraine/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sun Jul 31, 2022 11:00 pm

How Monsters Who Beat Jews To Death in 1944 Became America’s Favorite “Freedom Fighters” in 1945—with a Little Help from their Friends at CIA
By Evan Reif - June 10, 2022 26

Image
[Source: threadreadersapp.com]

Part II of a 3 Part series on Fascism and the CIA in Ukraine

“Terror will be not only a means of self-defense, but also a form of agitation, which will affect friend and foe alike, regardless of whether they desire it or not.” —UVO (fascist Ukrainian Military Organization) brochure from 1929

After the end of the Second World War, American intelligence immediately set about the work of rehabilitating the world’s fascists to fight the new war on Communism. From the transformation of the bloody “Devil of Showa” Nobusuke Kishi into the hand-picked Prime Minister of Japan, to Emil Augsburg, the architect of the Holocaust described as “Honest and idealist … enjoys good food and wine…unprejudiced mind…” by the CIA, it seems that Langley never met a fascist it couldn’t do business with.

Such was the case with Yaroslav Stetsko and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN). Stetsko spent the war in the shadow of Stepan Bandera but eventually Stetsko would far surpass his friend in terms of prominence. Before long, the monsters who had beaten Jews to death with hammers just years before became America’s favorite “freedom fighters” and took their business global.

Image
Yaroslav Stetsko, left, with bust of him in Ternopil in Ukraine. [Source: forward.com]

The Principality of Yaroslav

“Therefore, I stand at the establishment of the extermination of the Jews and the expediency of transferring to Ukraine the German methods of exterminating Jews, excluding their assimilation…” —Yaroslav Stetsko\

At the direction of Nazi war criminal Alfred Rosenberg, the Committee of Subjugated Nations was formed in 1943, with the idea to unite all anti-Soviet partisans under one banner. In reality, the bulk of its members were OUN soldiers, and its leader was the second-in-command of the OUN, Yaroslav Stetsko. CSN changed its name to the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations or ABN in 1946. The name ABN will be used for the sake of consistency.

Image
Alfred Rosenberg [Source: encyclopedia.ushmm.org]

Stetsko was a close friend of OUN-B founder Stepan Bandera. Like Bandera he was a militant anti-Semite equating Marxism with Judaism, while calling for the extermination of both. Even after the war, when his American bosses forced him to soften his public statements, he still called for an “ethnically pure” Ukraine, purged of Jews, Poles and Russians.

Stetsko believed that his own Galician Ukrainians were the direct descendants of the Rus, the Norse conquerors who eventually became the first Tsars under Rurik. These Nordic people were Stetsko’s master race, imbued with all the qualities you would expect.

On the other hand, Stetsko considered Russians to be Asiatic rather than European. Russians were seen as the descendants of the Mongols and Huns, making them naturally tyrannical, cruel and deceitful. Stetsko’s ideology would become the foundation on which modern Ukrainian fascists have built their movements. The parallels to Nazism are obvious enough that it is surprising to see this ideology find a home in the Wall Street Journal today.

Image
Caricature of Putin as an Asian warrior. [Source: si.wsj.net]

In 1944, sensing the imminent demise of Nazi Germany, the OUN reached out to British intelligence. The two sides met at the Vatican, not long after which OUN’s leadership surrendered to the Americans. Spirited away to Munich, their Western patrons provided them luxury apartments and SS bodyguards. In the immediate aftermath of Nazi Germany’s defeat, many of OUN’s soldiers worked as hitmen in the vast network of “displaced persons” camps under the command of MI6.

It was the British and Germans who were the primary patrons of the old OUN at this moment. Notorious Nazi spymaster Reinhard Gehlen was not just the handler for Stetsko and Bandera, but also their friend. They met while the OUN was fighting for the Nazis and remained friends for the rest of their lives.

Image
Reinhard Gehlen [Source: wikipedia.org]

The first significant American support arrived in 1947, and with it a greatly expanded mandate.

As Peter Grose detailed in his book Operation Rollback: America’s Secret War Behind the Iron Curtain (Boston: Mariner Books, 2001), the CIA covertly provided arms, training and support for operations within the USSR itself where many nationalist forces continued to fight against the Red Army as partisans.

The nationalist forces in Ukraine were an amalgamation of SS remnants, OUN/UPA forces, criminals, and various other collaborator militias. Confined mostly to the forests of western Ukraine, they operated as bandits, raiding collective farms, ambushing soldiers, and assassinating Soviet officials. Jews and CPSU members were particularly coveted targets.

The CIA provided not only weapons but also inserted teams of spies and commandos. Fighting continued until the mid-1950s, with the last stragglers killed or arrested in 1960.

The death toll for these operations is unclear, with estimates ranging from 20-50,000. The vast majority of these were civilians, often killed with axes and hammers—which was the OUN’s trademark. The OUN claims that it was NKVD infiltrators in OUN uniforms who killed the civilians; declassified KGB documents, however, have proven that was not the case.

Image
Mykola Lebed [Source: encyclopediaofukraine.com]

Lebed, however, was willing to work with other Ukrainian nationalist groups and allowed all Ukrainians into his organization, while Bandera demanded absolute control of the ABN and an ethnically pure OUN. Bandera also had a cavalier attitude toward security, refusing to use secure communications with the reasoning that the inferior Asiatic Russians were not smart enough to catch him. The KGB would therefore intercept most of his phone calls and correspondences, to the increasing fury of the CIA.

The CIA’s repeated warnings, however, did not dissuade the British and Germans, who remained Bandera’s main patrons. The situation continued to get worse over the years, driving the CIA to issue a burn notice for Bandera in 1954. The CIA not only discontinued all support for Bandera, but also threatened to kill him if his patrons at allied MI6 did not follow suit.

“2. If CIA and the SS are unable to agree upon a formula for coordinated operations along the lines outlined above, the CIA position will be: a. Each side will continue its separate line of action with limited operational coordination at the Washington-London level. b. CIA will take independent action to neutralize the present leadership of the OUN/B.” [SS here refers to the British Security Service, the official name for MI6, not the Nazi SS.]

The British got the message and withdrew their support for Bandera. The same year, the ABN expelled Bandera, leaving him permanently marginalized. Five years later, the KGB assassinated Bandera in his home in Munich.

The CIA’s problem was with Bandera personally and so, with him gone, so too were any restrictions on Stetsko. Rather than feuding with Lebed for funding as before, the U.S. simply doled out twice the money. Stetsko was now in the driver’s seat, and from this moment on commanded the remnants of Bandera’s bandit army with almost limitless Western support.

The Fascist International

“We, the free people gathered here, accuse the Carter administration of betraying humanity.”
—Mario Sandoval Alarcón, Guatemalan death squad leader, at the 1979 World Anti-Communist League (WACL) conference

After the ABN’s military power in Ukraine was spent, the organization grew somewhat listless for a time. Far from the axe-wielding terrorists of a few years past, Stetsko mostly engaged in propaganda and demonstrations. Likewise, the ABN’s rhetoric softened considerably at this time in an attempt to broaden funding appeal, changing from blood and soil to freedom and democracy.

This rebranding was little more than a PR campaign. The ABN remained a virulently anti-Semitic and right-wing organization. For example, we have Stetsko’s relationship with Marvin Liebman, a far-right activist who worked with both the Zionist terrorists in Irgun and white supremacists in Rhodesia. Liebman briefly worked with the ABN in 1958 but found himself so disgusted by Stetsko’s hatred of Jews that he publicly denounced the ABN and refused to work for them again. Liebman received death threats from the ABN for years after.

Image
Marvin Liebman [Source: wikipedia.org]

It wasn’t just Stetsko, either. In 1984, ABN executive director and Nazi officer Nikolai Nazarenko gave a speech at the annual Captive Nations dinner, in which he said:

“There is a certain ethnic group that makes its home in Israel. This ethnic group works with the Communists all the time. They were the Fifth Column in Germany and in all the Captive Nations…They would spy, sabotage and do any act in the interest of Moscow. Of course there had to be the creation of a natural self defense against this Fifth Column. They had to be isolated. Security was needed. So the Fifth Column were arrested and imprisoned. This particular ethnic group was responsible for aiding the Soviet NKVD. A million of our people were destroyed as a result of them aiding the NKVD…You hear a lot about the Jewish Holocaust, but what about the 140 million Christians, Moslems and Buddhists killed by Communism? That is the real Holocaust and you never hear about it!”

Image
Nazarenko during the war. [Source: kir-bor.livejournal.com]

After this speech, Nazarenko went back to his role in the Republican Party, campaigning for Ronald Reagan as part of the GOP’s “National Heritage Groups.” The GOP briefly expelled him from the party in 1988 until lobbying from Anna Chennault returned him to his position.

With no war to fight, it seemed as if the ABN was fading into obscurity. This would change in 1966, with the establishment of the World Anti-Communist League (WACL), giving the old OUN the chance to export their brand of terror worldwide.

Initially, the WACL was a merger of the ABN with its Asian counterpart, the Chiang Kai-shek-led Asian People’s Anti-Communist League, but it would expand rapidly, taking in the world’s far-right militants with zeal. An anti-communist united front, there were no ideological restrictions on its members, meaning that terrorists and dictators rubbed elbows with professors and senators. Indeed, over the years WACL’s list of members would include Nazis and collaborators, dictators and death squad leaders, a Yakuza crime boss turned war criminal, Korean cult leader Sun Myung Moon and Senator John McCain, among many others.

Image
Sun Myung Moon [Source: freedomofmind.com]

WACL opened new frontiers for the old OUN stalwarts. They were now involved on four continents and with their intercontinental reach came new business opportunities trafficking drugs and weapons along with their old trades of murder and torture. ABN personnel were in high demand as both hit men and instructors for the world’s death squads.

WACL also served as a conduit for covert funds, disbursing millions to their clients. WACL gave plausible deniability, using an ostensibly private group as a front to fund organizations that governments could not be seen funding.

WACL and ABN set up regional chapters all over the world, some more successful than others. In Chile, the local ABN assisted fascist General Augusto Pinochet’s rise to power and in Argentina the group was involved in the “Dirty War,” a covert anti-Communist campaign resulting in the torture, murder and disappearance of more than 20,000 people.

Since its beginnings in Asia, WACL had been actively supporting anti-Communist groups in Vietnam. Chiang was the primary trainer of South Vietnamese Special Forces at bases in Taiwan, along with providing arms and considerable funding. WACL also made multiple trips to Vietnam, where they armed anti-Communist guerrillas.

It could have been there that WACL first met the infamous U.S. Army Gen. John Singlaub of MACV-SOG. Singlaub was one of the primary overseers of the Phoenix Program, a covert terror campaign carried out by CIA, U.S. Army Special Forces and South Vietnamese police. At least 20,000 Vietnamese were murdered, many thousands more brutally tortured with the assistance of WACL trainers.

Image
U.S. Army Special Forces General John Singlaub. [Source: washpost]

In 1981, four years after his dismissal from the Army by Jimmy Carter, Singlaub received a loan from his old friend Chiang. He used it to create the United States Council for World Freedom, the American chapter of WACL. In 1982, the IRS gave the Council for World Freedom tax-exempt status, which made it much easier to solicit donations from the wealthy, a task at which Singlaub excelled.

This private support was only a drop in the bucket compared to the nearly limitless funding from the newly minted Reagan administration. As a fulfillment of Reagan’s bellicose anti-Communist promises, funding for covert operations skyrocketed.

During this era, Stetsko was the belle of the ball, meeting with countless U.S. government officials, including Vice President and former CIA Director George H.W. Bush, and even President Reagan himself. Reagan brought his favorite thugs along with him, and it was at this time that the Latin American narco terrorists came to the forefront in the WACL. Singlaub and WACL wasted little time embracing their new allies, starting support for the Nicaraguan Contras only four days after the CIA in 1981.

When Congress cut off official funding to the Contras in 1984, the WACL’s role expanded to the primary conduit through which U.S. funds flowed to the death squads. Fundraising took place in the open, with the charismatic Singlaub finding great success hustling Texas oil barons for donations. He threw lavish fundraising dinners, raising at least $25 million in 1985 alone. At one of his parties, he even convinced a woman to buy the Contras a helicopter.

Image
[Source: twitter.com]

Image
[Source: twitter.com]

Wealth did not make WACL or ABN forget where they came from. They continued to get their hands dirty as arms dealers, assassins and consultants for terrorists and dictators all throughout the world. WACL was Reagan’s “third force,” a team of experts who could be sent anywhere in the world to conjure up a civil war or engineer a crackdown exactly when Washington needed it.

However, Bandera’s deputy could not rule forever. In 1986, at the peak of this golden era, Yaroslav Stetsko died of cancer in Munich. His wife Slava filled his position in WACL and the ABN.

Slava comes home

“Anti-semitism: A smear word used by the Communists against those who effectively oppose and expose them.
Fascist: An anti-Communist.
Nazi or Hitlerite: An active anti-Communist”

—Slava Stetsko, in the foreword to The Captive Nations: Our First Line of Defense


Image
Slava Stetsko [Source: encyclopediaofukraine.com]

Born Anna Yevheniya Muzyka, Slava was a long-time nationalist, joining the OUN in 1938. There, she met her future husband, Yaroslav. During the war she was the head of OUN’s youth and women’s division, and assisted in setting up the UPA medical corps.

After the war, she would become head of the ABN press corps and editor-in-chief of their newspaper, “ABN Correspondence.” After Bandera’s assassination, Slava became deputy chief of the OUN, and was head of its foreign policy from 1968 onward. After the death of her husband, Slava was named head of the ABN.

As you can see from the quote above, Slava was every bit the anti-Semite and fascist her husband was. By the time she took the reins in 1986, the decline of the USSR was terminal. As the USSR fell apart, funding for groups like hers started to dry up, as would political interest. When the Soviet Union fell in 1991, it almost seemed as if history had ended.

It was not the end for Slava Stetsko, however. On June 30, 1991, Slava returned to Ukraine to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the OUN’s declaration of independence in Lviv. It was also 50 years to the day since the Lviv pogrom of 1941. Yaroslav Stetsko broadcast his declaration in Lviv as the pogrom was taking place in the streets. Thousands of Jews were butchered with hammers and axes while Yaroslav pledged allegiance to Adolf Hitler.

Image
Scene from 1941 pogrom in Lviv where Jews were humiliated in the streets and massacred. [Source: timesofisrael.com]

Slava must have had fond memories of that day. About a year later, she officially re-founded her political party, this time under the name Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists. CUN was never a large party, but it was canny, recruiting mostly from police and security forces, the purposes for which would be seen after the Maidan. That said, CUN stood in elections, won seats and sat in ruling coalitions. Slava even opened the Verkhovna Rada in 1994 and again in 2002. After her death in 2003, she was eulogized as a hero by the Ukrainian media.

Image
[Source: voltaire.net]

Image
[Source: photo.unian.info]

The political situation at the time of Slava’s homecoming was fraught. In 1991, Leonid Kravchuk became President of Ukraine.

As was seen time and time again throughout the old union, Ukraine was looted for all it was worth by the U.S. and NATO. The standard of living plummeted in what was once one of the most prosperous regions of the Soviet Union, and crime ran rampant. Gangs went to war over table scraps, and the situation became so dire that many women were forced into prostitution to support themselves. Many more were simply kidnapped and trafficked from the country.

Inflation spiked by more than 4000%, making savings accounts worthless overnight. Bank defaults meant government employees often went without salary for years. State-owned industries were sold off for pennies on the dollar, and with them jobs vanished with nothing to replace them. This left even highly trained and educated people destitute to such an extent that many died from hunger and exposure. Ukraine became one of the poorest and most corrupt nations in Europe and remains so.

Kravchuk was an acolyte of Yeltsin, and so everything not bolted down was stolen or sold off. One of the more egregious examples was the Black Sea merchant fleet, which was privatized in 1992 and its ships transferred to offshore holding companies beginning in 1993. In 1991, the fleet of 280 ships was the third largest in the world. By 2004, only six remained.

Image
Leonid Kravchuk (right) with Boris Yeltsin. [Source: thumb.spokesman.com]

In the meantime, Crimea was having problems of its own. In 1991, shortly before the fall of the USSR, a referendum passed by a wide margin asking for the return of Crimea’s autonomy. The fall of the union made this impossible, so the Crimean parliament voted in 1992 for full independence. This was set to be confirmed via referendum, which the Ukrainian government prevented.

Crimea tried again in 1994, this time taking it to referendum first. Ukraine responded by dissolving the Crimean parliament, then arresting and deporting Crimea’s President Yuri Meshkov. In 1998, a new constitution was imposed on Crimea, curtailing their autonomy.

Image
Yuri Meshkov [Source: bintel.com]

Kravchuk’s government became increasingly unpopular during this time. In 1993, crippling mine strikes led to early elections in which, despite his best efforts, Kravchuk was defeated by another Leonid, this time named Kuchma.

Kuchma was no better. Widespread corruption remained the norm and Ukraine’s economy cratered under an even more extreme privatization and austerity regime.

Because of the economic strife, Kuchma faced a resurgence of the Communist party. Banned in 1991, the Communist party was reformed in 1993 after several victories in court. Although it was too late to field a presidential candidate, the CPU was the largest party in the Rada after the 1994 elections.

Due to Kuchma’s continued malfeasance, the Communists gained even more strength during the next four years, winning an impresssive victory in 1998’s parliamentary elections. With presidential elections scheduled for the next year, it was expected that the Communists would regain power. Kuchma, in a panic, rigged the election with American help.

Ukraine’s economy declined every year until 2000. Even as the situation improved with the turn of the millennium, Kuchma’s popularity did not. After Kuchma was caught on tape ordering the death of former right-wing terrorist turned journalist Georgiy Gongadze, street protests erupted throughout Ukraine. Kuchma followed that up by selling advanced Soviet radar units to Saddam Hussein, leading to a Western boycott.

Kuchma tried to stabilize the situation by aggressively playing Russia and NATO against each other. On the campaign trail, Kuchma advocated for improved relations with Russia, but after he won, he went back and forth as the circumstances demanded. Kuchma’s government signed treaties with both the CIS and NATO, and only one year after selling radar to Iraq, Ukraine helped invade Iraq as part of Operation Iraqi Freedom to get back in America’s good graces.

Image
Kravchuk (left) with Bill Clinton in 2007. [Source: pinchukfund.org]

Kuchma’s attempts to save the ship failed. After constant protests and political pressure, he agreed to step down after the 2004 election, instead putting forth his protégé and Prime Minister, Viktor Yanukovych. It was this election that would begin a nearly 20 year rollercoaster ride of Ukrainian politics, the aftermath of which we can still clearly see today.

Slava Stetsko would not live to see this, dying in 2003 after a short illness. Her political party continued on, however, and would play a vital role in the saga of the struggles of the next two decades. After the Maidan, the children of Bandera and Stetsko, raised at the bosom of the CIA, would get the chance to finally fulfill their purpose as an army of fascist killers.

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/0 ... ds-at-cia/

Former Bolivian President Evo Morales Calls For a Global Campaign to Eliminate NATO
By Jeremy Kuzmarov - July 30, 2022 7

Image
Evo Morales [Source: declassifieduk.org]

In interview with British journalist, Morales says the U.S. uses NATO to provoke wars and sell weapons. U.S./UK-backed coup against him in 2019 was undertaken for lithium and because his government advanced an alternative economic model to the neoliberal “Washington Consensus”

In an interview with British journalist Matt Kennard at his home in El Trópico, a small town four hours from Cochabamba in the heart of the Amazon rain forest, former Bolivian president Evo Morales (2006-2019) called for an international campaign to eliminate NATO [the North Atlantic Treaty Organization].

According to Morales, this campaign should explain to people worldwide that “NATO is—ultimately—the United States. It is not a guarantee for humanity or for life. I do not accept—in fact, I condemn—how they can exclude Russia from the UN Human Rights Council. When the U.S. has intervened in Iraq, in Libya, in so many countries in recent years, why have they not been expelled from the Human Rights Council? Why was that never questioned?”

Morales continued: “We [in the Movimiento al Socialismo, MAS] have profound ideological differences with the politics implemented by the United States using NATO, which are based on interventionism and militarism. Between Russia and Ukraine they want to reach an agreement and [the U.S.] keeps provoking war, the U.S. military industry, which is able to live thanks to war, and they provoke wars in order to sell their weapons. That’s the other reality we live in.”

Image
[Source: iuvmpress.news]

Coup Against Alternative Economic Model

Morales is one of the most successful presidents in Latin American history who closed down a U.S. military base in Bolivia, expelled the CIA and DEA, and helped reverse half a millennium of colonial history by helping Bolivia to industrialize its economy.

In November 2019, Morales was ousted in a U.S./UK-backed coup that culminated with the army’s massacre of anti-coup protesters. Morales survived an assassination attempt only because Mexico’s president, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, sent a plane to rescue him.

The beneficiary of the coup, Jeanine Áñez—a conservative Christian who lost the October 2020 election to Luis Arce of MAS—was sentenced to 10 years in prison in June after being convicted of terrorism and sedition.

Morales—who returned to Bolivia after Arce’s election in October 2020—believes that the coup was prompted by his move to nationalize Bolivia’s oil and gas reserves.

Morales told Matt Kennard that “I continue to be convinced that the empire, capitalism, imperialism, do not accept that there is an economic model that is better than neoliberalism. The coup was against our economic model…we showed that another Bolivia is possible.”

Image
[Source: reddit.com]

“All For Lithium”

In 2021, the British Foreign Office released documents which showed that the British embassy in Bolivia had paid an Oxford-based company to optimize “exploitation” of Bolivia’s lithium deposits the month after Morales fled the country after being ousted in the coup.

The documents also showed the UK embassy in La Paz acted as “strategic partner” to Áñez’ coup regime and organized an international mining event in Bolivia four months after democracy was overthrown.

Image
Jeff Glekin, the UK ambassador, with Jeanine Áñez in January 2020. [Source: declassifieduk.org]

Bolivia possesses the world’s second largest reserves of lithium, a metal used to make batteries, which has been increasingly coveted due to the burgeoning electric-car industry.

Under the traditional imperial dynamic which had kept Bolivia poor, rich countries extract raw materials, send them to Europe to be made into products, and then sell them back to Third World countries like Bolivia as finished products at a mark-up.

With Bolivia’s lithium deposits, Morales was adamant this system was finished. Bolivia would not just extract the lithium; it would build the batteries too. He told Kennard that:

“We started with a laboratory, obviously with international experts that we hired. Then we moved on to a pilot plant. We invested around $20 million, and now it’s working. Every year it produces about 200 tonnes of lithium carbonate, and lithium batteries, in Potosí [the capital of the Spanish empire where the Spanish had undertaken silver mining in the 17th, 18th and early 19th centuries.]”

Image
Bolivian state firm YLB’s plant is seen at the Salar de Uyuni, a vast white salt flat at the center of a global resource race for the battery metal lithium, outside of Uyuni, Bolivia, March 26, 2022. [Source: learningenglish.voanews.com]

Morales continued: “We had a plan to install 42 new [lithium] plants by 2029. It was estimated that profits would be five billion dollars. Profits! That’s when the coup came. The U.S. says China’s presence is not permitted but…having a market in China is very important. Also in Germany. The next step was with Russia, and then came the coup. Just last year, we found out that England had also participated in the coup—all for lithium.”

Colonial Mentality

When Kennard told Morales that the UK Foreign office had denied that a coup took place, Morales responded that this was hard to comprehend and reflected “a totally colonial mindset. They think that some countries are the property of other nations. They think God put them there, so the world belongs to the U.S. and the UK. That’s why the rebellions and the uprisings will continue.”

With the People or the Evil Empire?

Morales has great admiration for Julian Assange whose detention, he said, “represents an escalation, an intimidation so that all the crimes against humanity committed by the different governments of the United States are never revealed. So many interventions, so many invasions, so much looting.”

Image
Morales has great admiration for Julian Assange. [Source: siguardian.org]

Currently, Morales is working on building independent media in Bolivia, where he says that most of the media “belong to the empire or the right-wing.”

Optimistic about the recent victory of left-wing political forces in Peru, Chile and Colombia and Lula’s expected return to the presidency in Brazil, Morales told Kennard that, “in politics we must ask ourselves: Are we with the people or are we with the empire? If we are with the people, we make a country; if we are with the empire, we make money. If we are with the people, we fight for life, for humanity; if we are with the empire, we are with the politics of death, the culture of death, interventions, and pillaging of the people. That is what we ask ourselves as humans, as leaders: ‘Are we at the service of our people?’”

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/0 ... nate-nato/

*****************************

About the course of the NWO. 07/31/2022
July 31, 21:47

Image

About the course of the NWO. 07/31/2022

- The advertised attack on Kherson of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is not visible. Except for him an attempt to expand the bridgehead on the left bank of the Ingulets. What does the dynamics look like on this sector of the front?

- Positional battles continue here with periodic attempts by the Armed Forces of Ukraine to attack with small forces in the Krivoy Rog and Nikopol directions. The latest attempts ended not very well for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but they will certainly be repeated. A direct attack on Kherson from Nikolaev looks unlikely.
As a maximum, they can try to reduce the bridgehead of the RF Armed Forces on the right bank of the Dnieper.
The RF Armed Forces are accumulating forces in the Nikolaev direction, in view of which the enemy started talking about a possible offensive of the RF Armed Forces on Nikolaev.
Attacks on bridges have not yet made a fundamental change in the dynamics of hostilities.

- The positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Avdiyivka are being ironed by artillery and VKS for several days. Activation near Krasnogorovka, Maryinka, Sand. How to release the specified n.p. will it affect the shelling of the Donetsk-Makiyivka agglomeration, taking into account the fact that the enemy with Western supplies has expanded the geography of shelling?

- The release of these settlements will prevent the enemy from using part of the artillery systems to shell the city, but it should be borne in mind that the presence of heavy MLRS and OTRK retains the ability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to shell Donetsk even from the Krasnoarmeysk region.

Nevertheless, advancement in these areas will certainly reduce the overall intensity of shelling of Donetsk and other settlements. Donetsk agglomeration.

- Channels report on the concentration of forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Bryansk and Kharkov directions (except for Kherson). What can the enemy do here, given that the activity is stopped by the artillery of the RF Armed Forces?

- In the Kharkov direction, the enemy, on the one hand, provides the defense of Kharkov, Chuguev and Zolochev and the retention of the current front line, for which reserves are needed.
On the other hand, local offensive actions may follow in order to recapture several settlements previously occupied by the RF Armed Forces. In the direction of the Bryansk region, one can expect an intensification of shelling and actions of the enemy's DRG.
If we talk about the risks of an offensive by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, then more likely (in addition to Kherson) are the Zaporozhye direction (Vasilyevka, Tokmak, Pologi) and Balakleya in the Izyum direction.

- According to my information, the enemy is trying to advance in the Volnovakha direction. What is he counting on?

- With its activity in this direction, the enemy is trying to improve his tactical position, as well as to divert our command from operations in the Donetsk and Artemovsk directions, forcing additional forces to be transferred here to stabilize the front.
In the current realities, a serious advance of the enemy to Volnovakha is not possible. The offensive at Ugledar showed that the price of even one occupied settlement, like the same Pavlovka, turns out to be too high with minimal tactical benefits.

- The provocations of recent days with the "castration" of the "Ukrainian prisoner", the shelling of the colony in Yelenovka by Khaimars and the death of the captured "Azov" testify to the information war from the West to a new level. What else can we expect? Attacks on the ZNPP?

- I would expect not only new attacks on infrastructure facilities in the liberated territories and on ammunition depots/fuel and lubricants, but also further intensification of terrorist activities on the territory of the Russian Federation.
This activity will receive the full and unconditional support of the West, which will support any terrorist attacks against the Russian Federation, if necessary, facilitating them.
Hence the need to consider the issue of stigmatizing our opponents as terrorists at the official level - this applies to both perpetrators,

- Is it true that Ukraine is refraining from strikes on Sevastopol, the Crimean bridge, Belgorod and Kursk because of fears of the safety of the government quarter in Kyiv?

- As we can see from today's terrorist attack in Sevastopol and the ongoing shelling of the border areas, Zelensky's gang is not particularly worried about the government quarter in Kyiv. The voiced threats of strikes against decision-making centers do not particularly impress the Zelensky gang, much less impress its sponsors. Therefore, in my subjective opinion, more targeted and demonstrative strikes are needed on the centers of the Nazi regime in Ukraine, ranging from regional regional state administrations to the buildings of the SBU and GUR MOU in Kyiv and other cities - in fact, they are no different from the regional offices of ISIS in Syria and Iraq in 2014-2018 From my point of view, these are now legitimate military targets.

- How can the escalation of the situation in Taiwan affect the fighting in Ukraine?

- In the event of a hypothetical outbreak of hostilities in the Taiwan Strait, this will obviously affect the volume of arms supplies to Ukraine, since the United States will, in fact, be forced to fight on two fronts. Plus, the economic tsunami after the start of the war in Taiwan will hit Europe very hard, which threatens it with even more terrible consequences than the rejection of Russian gas.
Therefore, from the point of view of the operation in Ukraine, the aggravation of the crisis around Taiwan is objectively beneficial for the Russian Federation, since it diverts part of the enemy’s forces to another theater of operations.

- What will the mobilization of women give the Kyiv regime? When will the mobilization famine begin in Kyiv?

- It will give some more cannon fodder.
With the continuation of hostilities at the current intensity of manpower, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will have enough to compensate for the large losses for many more months to come, with a general decrease in the quality of personnel. The mobilized women will allow the release of men for the front.
The war strategy to the last Ukrainian assumes that everything that is possible will be raked to the front without a trace. Victims for the organizers of this conveyor are not fundamental. This is a consumable item.

- Why are we not working on the combat control centers and key figures of the enemy's military leadership?

- So far, the most high-profile strikes of this kind are the strike on the headquarters of the Sever OTG and the strike on the command of the Ukrainian Air Force in Vinnitsa.
From my point of view, such strikes are desirable and necessary much more often.

- Will there be any result from the agreements with Iran in terms of deliveries of strike UAVs to Russia?

- I think it's very likely. Deliveries, most likely, will be legalized through the organization of a joint production of drones in Russia.

- According to the military, the logistics of the warring factions, to put it mildly, leaves nothing to be desired. Will the situation in this regard change in almost six months with the beginning of the SVO, and what needs to be changed first of all?

- The situation has improved somewhat compared to the first months, but in matters of supply there are still a lot of problems that help to partially close civilian humanitarian organizations.
There is still a lot of work to be done to increase the systemic state accumulation of funds, increase the efficiency of procurement of the necessary and the speed of delivery of the necessary to the troops. The society here is ready to fully help the state - the main problems are seen in the sluggishness of various elements of the bureaucratic machine and the unpreparedness of logistics structures to conduct combat operations in such a vast theater of operations, which requires a more complex and extensive logistics system than, say, in Syria, not to mention the general volumes needed.
This is an objective problem and it is being solved, albeit not as quickly as I or you would like.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59007 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7772702.html

Putin returned the country to the 90s.
July 31, 19:32

Image

Putin returned the country to the 90s.

The German economy is lagging behind, writes in his article Libération. The author of the article compares the current situation with the 1990s, when Germany was just united.

In the second trimester of this year, Germany shows one of the worst economic results in the euro area. Against this background, other countries are still doing well, the average economic growth in the euro area was 0.7%. But Germany is on the verge of a recession. Experts attribute this to rising energy prices, which spread through the entire economy through a domino effect. Because of this, domestic demand continues to fall.

Inflation in Germany is a record, so the Germans are trying to save on everything they can, writes the author of the article. In October, their gas bill could triple. And this prospect is forcing Germans to change their consumption habits. For example, they began to save on food and household chemicals.

A "gloomy" atmosphere reigns at the enterprises as well. The business climate fell in July to its lowest level in two years. At the same time, the global economy is still suffering from the effects of the pandemic, which disrupted supply chains. For the first time since German reunification, the trade balance showed a negative result in May. For a country that has been exporting for 20 years, this is a shock. According to German statistics, every tenth company in Germany has already reduced production volumes.

This situation greatly worries Germany's neighbors as well, since they depend on the German conjuncture. As the author of the article writes, no one has forgotten the saying from the 1990s: "When Germany sneezes, all of Europe is sick."

However, the German government still hopes to end the year with an economic growth rate of more than 2%. However, as the author of the article writes, Olaf Scholz understands that this depends on the goodwill of Moscow. If Putin finally shuts off the gas, Germany's GDP will fall by 4-5%, experts say. This is about the same figures as at the height of the pandemic in 2020.

What is clear is thatThe "second economic miracle" of the Merkel era is over. The current crisis has called into question the entire model of the German economy, which is based on the consumption of cheap Russian gas and on the export of goods to the global market. So, every third Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes car went to China - this market greatly saved German manufacturers.

But such an addiction is not healthy, experts warn. And therefore it is not clear how, in this context, the authorities will be able to return to the abandonment of debt, thanks to which Germany achieved results in its time.

As a result, the authorities are afraid of social indignation, even protests against the system, which could be adopted by the far right. It is believed that the most acute crisis period will take place in October, when the Germans will first receive gas bills with new tariffs. Those who were against refugees in 2015 and against vaccines in 2020 will now find a new occupation. They are already on Mondays taking to the streets of some cities in East Germany, demanding the abandonment of anti-Russian sanctions.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Berbock has already noted that we may soon see popular unrest again in the event of a complete cessation of Russian gas supplies. “At the moment, no one knows what scale this social crisis will reach. Everything will depend on Vladimir Putin,” concludes Liberation.

https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2022-07-30 ... nulis-90-e zinc

That's it. Putin brought Germany to a return to the 90s. Although, in fact, the crisis of the German economy is primarily a consequence of Germany's dependence on the United States, which actually pushed Germany to suicidal sanctions against Russia for its own economy, which actually drive Germany into the conditional 90s. This is the price to pay for the lack of military-political subjectivity, when the entire legacy of Merkel, who ensured Germany's economic growth for many years, is squandered literally in a matter of months. She was a seasoned politician and tried to maneuver to the end so as not to fall into this scenario, but her successors quickly saluted and provided the Germans with the very difficult times that Putin is now accused of in the same unique style in which Biden accuses Putin of rising prices and inflation in the US.

In fact, if Germany were independent, it could keep the old model, buying cheap Russian gas and enriching itself from the conflict at the expense of the highly competitive industry, which Scholitz and Burbock miraculously collapse. But it is quite obvious that today's Germany is incapable of this, so she is carried away into a flow of events that she does not control and which directly destroys her economy.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7772240.html

Google Translator

********************************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

***

Damn. no sit reps. Tomorror morning I guess.........
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Mon Aug 01, 2022 1:59 pm

Humanitarian gestures and bombing
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/01/2022 ⋅ LEAVE A COMMENT

Image

Five months after the start of the Russian intervention in Ukraine, events are accelerating, the level of destruction is mounting and casualties are mounting on both sides of a front line that stretches from the south between Kherson and Nikolaev to the north of the Kharkov region. However, unlike in the first eight years of this war, not only the population in the front lines is being affected. In addition to the missile attacks with which Russia tries to destroy the Ukrainian military industry and the attacks with which both sides aspire to blow up enemy ammunition and weapons depots, the economic and social effects of the war are spreading throughout the territory.

However, as of February, the most serious effects of the war for the civilian population are experienced in Donetsk and Lugansk. Despite the fact that Ukraine tries to divert political and military attention by focusing on Kherson, forcing Russia to send a significant part of its reserves to that area, thus weakening the attack forces of the most important battle for Moscow, Donbass continues to be the center of this war. It was at the beginning of the special military operationand it was also until March, when the Russian peace proposal implied the withdrawal of the territories captured since February 24 -including Kherson- in favor of a negotiated peace and with the Ukrainian acceptance of the loss of Crimea and Donbass. With that proposal rejected and negotiations broken, the military solution has remained, for the time being, the only way to resolve the territorial issue. Hence, an eventual Russian withdrawal from places like Kherson can only happen because of a military defeat that, in no case, could be presented as a gesture of goodwill .

Pending the actual start of the much-heralded Ukrainian counterattack in Kherson, with which they hope to recapture the city before the end of September, the great battles that directly affect the civilian population continue to take place mainly in Donbass. The Russian advance from the Crimea was rapid and did not involve, with the possible exception of Berdyansk, major urban battles comparable to what was experienced in Mariupol, Popasnaya or Severodonetsk. The destruction of this war extends across the entire front and has affected civil and military infrastructure in much of the Ukraine's regions, but nothing compares to what Donbass suffered.

From the moment the Russian and republican advance began in Donbass, then especially in Lugansk, the authorities called for an evacuation. Days before, the DPR and the RPL had begun an evacuation of the civilian population to Russia, which Western media described as forced deportation. As one of the most densely populated regions in Ukraine, the possibility of urban battles became a certainty from the moment that, in the first days of the Russian intervention, artillery guns could be seen in the very center of Severodonetsk, between residential buildings . As Mijailo Podoliak, adviser to the Office of the President, would later admit in a statement that implicitly referred to the human shield strategy, cities offer a defense that the open countryside prevents.

With the entire territory of the former Lugansk region under control of the LPR, the battle for Donbass is now focused exclusively on the Donetsk region. In the south, in the less populated area, DPR troops are facing Ukrainian troops north of Volnovakha; in the north, Russian troops, the LPR army and the private company Wagner fight around Seversk and Soledar and approach Arytomovsk before advancing towards Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. But although the fight for that area is considered the key to this battle, reaching the border of the Donetsk region implies advancing even further towards Alexandrovka, an area less populated and hitherto less defended, but which has been reinforced in recent months. as the next line of defense.

The situation is just as harsh around Donetsk, where Ukrainian troops are still holding out, protected by fortifications built over eight years in an area where the front has not moved since February 2015. But even beyond Peski and Avdeevka, reaching the border of the region involves battles for Kurajovo, Konstantinopol or the Konstantinovka communications hub. In that direction, after a first phase of artillery attacks on the Ukrainian positions, a progressive phase of assault on these Ukrainian forts has begun. Peski and Avdeevka seem, for the moment, the main objectives, for which it is key to cut off the main supply routes of the Ukrainian troops.

With its main positions in the Donetsk region threatened, which since May 29 have allowed Donetsk to be bombarded regularly and indiscriminately with both Western artillery and Soviet and Ukrainian artillery, kyiv's response has been to continue the attacks against Donetsk, in which in recent days a novelty has joined. Hundreds of anti-personnel mines known as petals have also been disseminated through the projectiles fired., devices of small size and, therefore, easy to step on, whose explosion was possibly not fatal, but which can cause amputations. One more danger for the civilian population of Donetsk, who throughout the weekend have seen live the work of the sappers marking and deactivating that ammunition in the very center of the most populous city in the area.

In this context of launched battle, slow Russian advance, great destruction of civil and military infrastructure in the region and indiscriminate bombardment in civilian areas of the main city of the region, on Saturday the First Deputy Minister of Ukraine Irina Vereschuk and President Volodymyr Zelensky then they announced the forced evacuation of the population of the Donetsk region, some 200,000 people, whom Ukraine intends to "save from Russian troops." Ukraine promises help and funding to the new refugees, despite the fact that the experience of the population of Donbass in other regions of Ukraine has not been positive in the last five months or in the last eight years. Cases of discrimination, demonstrations of hate and difficulties in finding a job have been constant since 2014. And this week, the agencyAP reported the return of the population to areas of the front due to the difficulties of life in the rest of the country.

According to Vereschuk, the motivation for the order lies in the situation in the area. With the pipes destroyed, it will be impossible to heat the towns and cities, an argument difficult to believe considering the carelessness with which the Ukrainian state has treated the population of Donbass, even those under its control.

With this evacuation order, Ukraine admits, first of all, that the war will not end in the coming months as Zelensky demanded. Just a few days ago, the Ukrainian president again insisted on the importance of the Ukrainian victory coming before winter. Aware that the energy crisis could undermine Western support for Ukraine, the Ukrainian head of state is trying to get more weapons and more ammunition with the naive goal of recovering in four months what was lost in the last five.

The passage also foreshadows the continuation of a battle similar to the one that has been lived until now, with the use of artillery in urban areas and the destruction that this type of war implies. For the civilian population, the forced evacuation denotes Ukraine's attempt to avoid scenes such as those experienced in Lisichansk, where in the last days of the battle, Ukrainian volunteers were rejected by the population that had chosen to remain in the city and awaited the arrival of Russian troops.

First of all, the forced evacuation order, which can only be avoided with a written declaration, supposes the definitive abandonment of that population that does not accept the invitation to move to western Ukraine. The State, which with this action makes clear its inability to create minimally acceptable living conditions for the civilian population, actually announces its lack of interest in Donbass. The population that remains in the Donetsk region against the government's recommendation will be used as a human shield in an operation that has long been nothing but senseless destruction of an area that Ukraine uses solely as a tool of punishment.

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/08/01/25183/#more-25183

Google Translator

***************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

***

Сolonelcassad
2:19
❗️🇬🇧🇺🇦The main results of the NWO in Ukraine for July 30-31, 2022

▪️On Sunday morning, an explosive device was dropped from a UAV on the territory of the headquarters of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy in Sevastopol , 6 people were injured.

▪️Ukrainian formations fired at the border village of Tetkino in the Kursk region, the power line was damaged, there were no casualties.

▪️In the north of the Kharkiv region, information is being disseminated among the population about the counter-offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine against Cossack Lopan . In the area of ​​​​Cherkassky Tishkov and the village of Vesyoloye , positional battles are taking place.

▪️The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation inflicted massive strikes on objects in Kharkov : the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the plant named after. Malyshev, as well as in the area of ​​​​Seminarskaya Street and the Press House.

▪️There are positional battles in Bakhmut, on the eastern outskirts of Soledar and the suburbs of Bakhmut (Artemovsk) . Units of the 14th ombr of the Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered heavy losses.

▪️Allied forces are advancing on Zaitsevo, Semigorye and Vesele Dolina . Ukrainian formations are resisting the RF Armed Forces in the area of ​​​​the village of Vershina.

▪️The allied forces are advancing in the Donetsk direction: in the vicinity of Avdiivka, a stronghold was occupied at the vent shaft of the Butovka mine , in the village of Peski - fighting is underway on the outskirts.

▪️Western-made anti-tank systems have been placed at the forefront positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Zaporozhye region in Orekhov, Novoandreevka and Kamensky .

▪️In the Nikolaev-Krivoy Rog direction , a group of fighters from the 18th battalion of the 35th infantry regiment tried to gain a foothold in Andreevka , but suffered losses and retreated.

▪️The Ukrainian command continues to strengthen the grouping of troops in the area. Crews of MANPADS 60 opbr arrived in Novogrigorovka and Knyazevka .

▪️On Sunday morning, the RF Armed Forces attacked targets in Nikolaev. The oligarch Alexei Vadatursky, who financed the Ukrainian military formations, died.

▪️On Sunday evening, Russian troops launched a missile attack on the outskirts of the Odessa airport.

***

Сolonelcassad
Special operation in Ukraine. The situation on July 31 according to RIA Novosti .

— Russia has invited experts from the UN and the Red Cross to investigate Kyiv's attack on the detention facility in Yelenovka, the Defense Ministry said.

- The Russian Aerospace Forces attacked the location of the militants of the Kraken formation in Kharkov, the losses of the nationalists amounted to 350 people.

- A Ukrainian drone attacked the headquarters building of the Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol, festive events were canceled in the city.

— Erdogan's spokesman said there is a high probability that the first ship with grain will leave Ukraine on August 1.

- DPR units entrenched themselves in the village of Peski in the suburbs of Donetsk, the People's Militia of the Republic said.

- In Donetsk, the streets are cleared of mines after the strike of the Ukrainian military, as a result of which the city was strewn with "petal mines".

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

**********************

Image
Photo by Gayatri Malhotra

Russia-Ukraine conflict: the propaganda war
By Gerald Sussman (Posted Jul 30, 2022)

Originally published: CounterPunch on July 27, 2022 (more by CounterPunch) |

We must remember that in time of war what is said on the enemy’s side of the front is always propaganda, and what is said on our side of the front is truth and righteousness, the cause of humanity and a crusade for peace.

– Walter Lippmann, cited in Shah 2005


What the mainstream media fail to see in the coverage of the current Ukraine crisis is that there is no text (narrative) without context. Long before the mainstream U.S. (and UK) media launched a worldwide propaganda war against the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February, the CIA had laid the foundations of the conflict in the early years following the Second World War–the Cold War. Friends (Soviet Union) became enemies and enemies (Germany, Japan) became friends. The CIA used the Nazi sections of the Ukraine nationalist movement to “crack apart” (the CIA’s words) the USSR through efforts to sabotage, divide, and destabilize the Soviet Union. In this projcct, they worked most closely with the violently anti-semitic, anti-communist, and anti-Russian group, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists-B, led by Stepan Bandera.

During the early part of World War II, Bandera had been in charge of OUN’s more ruthless faction that collaborated with the Nazi occupation and actively participated in the slaughter of millions of Poles, Ukrainian Jews, and ethnically Russian communists in the region. A CIA clandestine operations chief in Berlin at the time, Peter Sichel, stated that “They [OUN] were Nazis, pure and simple,” and indeed, “Worse than that, because a lot of them did the Nazis’ dirty work for them.” More recently, under pressure from the extreme right-wing forces in the country, including the Azov Battalion, Bandera was proclaimed by the president, Viktor Yushchenko, as “Hero of Ukraine,” the country’s highest honor, a status that was later abrogated by his successor, Victor Yanukovych.

The award was condemned by the European Parliament and by Polish, Jewish, and Russian organizations representing the hundreds of thousands of their ancestors who were directly murdered under Bandera’s leadership. But the pro-fascists in Ukraine’s power complex would not be deterred. Under the U.S. selectee for president in the post-coup government, Petro (“Chocolate King”) Poroshenko, previously an active informant at the U.S. embassy in Kiev, Bandera was again restored to the highest status and his birthday was made a national holiday. In Lviv, a startling Bandera monument and triumphal arch, stands next to a former Polish Catholic church, along with other monuments and renamed streets in western Ukraine in tribute to this wartime criminal.

As part of the CIA’s clandestine “stay-behind” operations (broadly known as “Operation Gladio”) in central and eastern Europe, Ukrainians recruited from OUN and other ultra-nationalist groups were used to start up an insurgency movement against the Soviet state that involved the smuggling of weapons, the uses of covert radio transmissions, spies, commandos, banditry, assassins, and sabotage. According to a declassified (originally “secret”) CIA history study, the Agency refused to extradite the murderous OUN leader to the Soviet Union in order to keep the underground movement and their destabilization efforts in Ukraine intact. Instead, two branches of the CIA, the Office of Policy Coordination (OPC) for covert operations and the Office of Special Operations (OSO) for clandestine projects in which the U.S. government provided cover, both protected the OUN and worked closely with the anti-Soviet Ukraine Insurgent Army and engaged in “psychological warfare activities directed against [Communist] Polish, Czechoslovakian, and Romanian targets bordering Ukraine.” OPC and OSO “agrees that the Ukrainian organization [Ukrainian Supreme Council of Liberation] offers unusual opportunities for penetration of the USSR, and assisting in the development of underground movements behind the Iron Curtain.”

As part of a relentless effort (to this day) of trying to “crack apart” the Soviet Union/Russia, the CIA has been at the forefront, joined by their obedient subaltern, MI6 (aka Secret Intelligence Service), in infiltrating central and eastern Europe during the Warsaw Pact and post-Soviet eras for the purpose of obliterating Moscow’s influence in the region and the sovereignty of Russia itself. Among its early Cold War allies were high-level Catholic Church officials in Vienna and anti-communist assets in the Vatican, which aided the Agency in collecting valuable intelligence in the region, particularly on Poland, Hungary, and Ukraine. In the same period, the CIA-launched “Operation Red Sox,” which was designed to stir up nationalist independence movements in the Soviet republics. American-trained commandos parachuted into Soviet Ukraine and linked up with anti-Soviet fighters. The CIA wound up sending 85 operatives, three-quarters of them captured, in what ended as a dismal communist “roll back” failure, a foretelling of the Bay of Pigs invasion a decade later.

With the Ukrainian insurgent movement crushed, many of the Banderites, including Mykola Lebed, one of the founders of OUN and a lieutenant of Bandera trained by the Gestapo in ruthless methods of torture, became émigrés. Lebed, who had served as OUN’s foreign minister and head of its notorious secret police, was then described by the U.S. Army as a “well-known sadist and collaborator of the Germans.” He migrated to Munich after the war, where he played an important role in the newly formed and secretly CIA-run Radio Free Europe, the U.S.-funded propaganda organ that transmitted to eastern Europe. During the World War II, Lebed was said to have been a favorite of the German SS.

When he fell out with the postwar OUN-B based in Germany, the CIA smuggled him, along with hundreds of German Nazis, including war criminals like SS officer Otto von Bolschwing (a leading organizer of the Final Solution), to the U.S.. Lebed worked in New York City under a false name as an anti-Soviet intelligence asset. The Ukrainians then and now were regarded as instruments of a Cold War policy designed to take down the Soviet Union/Russia. “Former members of the Ukrainian underground now in the United States,” the CIA wrote in a top-secret document, “will be exploited to the fullest extent practicable.”

Ukraine’s struggle for statehood have been bound up in the ultra-nationalist efforts to de-Russify the country, which after the 2014 coup led to restrictions on the practice of Russian culture. A 2019 law, criticized by Human Rights Watch, required that all conversations carried out by public officials and all schooling beyond the primary grades be conducted in Ukrainian and that all foreign language media, with exemptions given to English and EU languages, but not Russian, provide a Ukrainian version. The law was shepherded through parliament by its chair (speaker) Andriy Parubiy, a co-founder of the Social-National Party (SNPU), which was modeled after Hitler’s National Socialist Party. Parubiy declared the SNPU to be the “last hope of the white race, of humankind as such.” In 2004, SNPU morphed into the fascist party Svoboda, whose leader Oleh Tyahnybok, a former member of parliament (Rada), gave a speech that year calling upon Ukraine to rid itself of the “Muscovite-Jewish mafia,” familiar words from the Third Reich.

Although the extreme right parties hold little power in the Rada, groups such as the Azov Battalion wield a great deal of power in Ukraine’s street militias, the national guard, the Kiev police, and the regular army. Initially, the U.S. banned assistance to Azov in 2015 because of its neo-Nazi orientation and assaults on migrants and the Roma and LGBT communities, but lifted the ban the following year. Azov’s first commander and former member of parliament, Andriy Biletsky, declared that Ukraine’s national objective was to “lead the white races of the world in a final crusade … against Semite-led Untermenschen [subhumans].” And despite entreaties from at least 40 members of the U.S. Congress to list Azov as a “foreign terrorist organization,” the Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations failed to respond.

Why do the American mainstream media (MSM) pay so little attention to the racist agenda and war crimes of Azov (as if only Russians commit war crimes), the leading military force attempting to crush the independence movements in the Donbas region? Could it be that many reporters in the mainstream media in the U.S., UK, and other western European countries share similar, indeed racist prejudices? Since the Russian attack in February, the briefly reported incidents of African and Asian nationals being blocked by Ukrainian officials from leaving the country during the early shelling of the Kiev revealed one side of the racial aspects of the conflict. But the MSM coverage of white Ukrainians fleeing war zones to other countries gave a more explicit understanding of how the U.S. MSM treats “worthy” and “unworthy” victims based on race.

Multiple notable British, American and other Western journalists have focused on the Ukrainian flight within a narrative frame of racial supremacist ideology. An English TV anchor working for Al Jazeera, Peter Dobbie, for example, had this to say about Ukrainian war victims: “These are prosperous, middle-class people … not people trying to get away from areas in North Africa. They look like any European family that you would live next door to.” In Britain, an ITV correspondent, Lucy Watson, speaking from a Polish train station where Ukrainian immigrants had arrived, expressed shock at seeing white war refugees: “Now the unthinkable has happened to them. And this is not a developing, Third World nation. This is Europe!” Her American counterpart in Poland, NBC News reporter Kelly Cobiella, wept in white solidarity: “To put it bluntly, these are not refugees from Syria, these are refugees from neighboring Ukraine …. They’re Christians, they’re white. They’re very similar to people who live in Poland.” CBS news correspondent Charlie D’Agata offered a straightforward assessment that Ukrainians are “relatively” white and therefore more worthy than Arabs: “This isn’t a place–with all due respect–like Iraq or Afghanistan…. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European–I have to choose those words carefully too–city [Kiev] where you wouldn’t expect that or hope that it’s going to happen” (italics added). On France’s premier cable news channel, BFM TV, the journalist Phillipe Corbe also applied the racial hierarchy scoring of tragedy:

We’re not talking here about Syrians…. We’re talking about Europeans leaving in cars that look like ours to save their lives.

There is an easy segue from racial to national prejudice, which is why the biased U.S. mainstream media coverage of the invasion also showed a disinclination to analyze the nature, history, and causes of the conflict. The MSM also censor voices that question the dominant narrative so as not to populate the discourse with alternative ways of interpreting the crisis. No source in the MSM could be found focusing on the role of the U.S. in inciting the war, on the recent and related history of America’s own invasions, or on the effects of sanctions on ordinary Russian citizens. At least half of the Russians selected for American news interviews were picked solely because of their opposition to the war, even though 80% of Russians two months into the war supported the invasion.

Apart from the anti-Russian prejudices that have infected mainstream media coverage of the Soviet Union/Russia since the Bolshevik Revolution (and for the imperialist-minded British, the Crimean War), there is a new coalition of neoconservative forces in the Democratic Party and its allies in the intelligence establishment, the IT industries, and major media institutions in the U.S. and UK that have mobilized public opinion in the U.S.. Since the G. W. Bush administration, broadcast and cable news channels have been packed with foreign policy analysts drawn from the community of retired intelligence officers, high-ranking military and defense officials, and politicians, many of them concurrently on the dole of defense industries, but without viewing audiences told about it. They include such figures as retired four-star general Jack Keane, General David Petraeus, and former secretaries of defense Leon Panetta and Condoleezza Rice. These conflicts of interest go largely unnoticed in the neoliberal boundary- and ethically-free and militarized U.S. political culture.

The circuit of corporate state-MSM propaganda is constantly renewed within the echo chambers of Washington. As Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky noted in their classic study of news propaganda, few journalists who cover foreign policy are willing to jeopardize their privileged perches in the corporate media by seeking sources outside of the national power complex–the White House, State Department, DoD, CIA, and DC-area think tanks. Journalist Stephen Kinzer has said that the worst aspect of the closure of public debate on U.S. policy in eastern Europe is that “the press is such an eager participant,” in its “over-the-top demonization of Putin” and its “portrayal of Russia as a predatory enemy about to crush us.” This has led newspapers like his former employer, the New York Times “to become even more militant than the Pentagon.”

The Russia-Ukraine news coming out of the MSM leans heavily on a Manichaean depiction of the two heads of state. On the one hand, there is the evil spirited Putin with grand ambitions of restoring the Soviet Union by running over the former Warsaw Pact countries, which does not require any evidence, as there is no penalty for publishing or expressing falsehoods about Russia and Putin. In Joe Biden’s diplomatic descriptives, Putin is a “killer,” “war criminal,” “murderous dictator,” and “a pure thug,” and yet in Europe Biden is still treated as the preeminent world leader and statesman. And then there’s the modern-day Joan of Arc in the person of Volodymyr Zelensky, the State Department’s heroic nationalist, with fawning admiration from the Western media. G.W. Bush called him “the Winston Churchill of our time.”

The MSM has failed to discuss his autocratic and repressive actions (far more than what’s occurring in Russia). In the past few months, Zelensky has banned all (11) opposition parties and encouraged “the disappearance, torture and even murder of an array of human rights activists, communist and leftist organizers, journalists and government officials accused of ‘pro-Russian’ sympathies.” Among those banned was the second largest party in Ukraine whose leader, Viktor Medvedchuk was arrested for “treason”–namely questioning the country’s integration efforts with the EU, which the president regards as siding with Russia.

In October 2021, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists exposed the Pandora Papers, a roster of world leaders, wealthy individuals, politicians, celebrities, and others who put their money in offshore accounts for the purpose of evading taxes. Ukraine had the most number of politicians cited in the exposé, consistent with the listing of the country as consistently the most corrupt in Europe, according to Transparency International, a U.S. government-and corporate-funded “anti-corruption” organization.

Opposing Zelensky’s nationalist and heroic image, the Pandora Papers revealed that he and his show business partners in a television production company, Kvartal 95, were invested in “a network of offshore firms dating back to at least 2012.” This was the year that his company began producing regular TV station content “owned by [Ukrainian–Israeli–Cypriot billionaire] Ihor Kolomoisky, an oligarch [and political patron of Zelensky] dogged by allegations of multi-billion-dollar fraud.” The offshore stashing of assets by Zelensky and his partners to avoid tax obligations also include “three prime properties in the center of London.” His business associates have been conveniently turned into government officials.

What has changed in U.S. relations with Russia is not just the superpower’s aggressiveness–the posting of NATO bases all the way to the perimeter of Moscow, enabling first strike capability–but as important, its abandonment of diplomacy. Even Ronald Reagan, who foamed about the “evil empire,” engaged in détente and military treaty-making with a far more formidable foe, compared to Russia that is, the Soviet Union. Trump and members of his inner-circle were accused by the Clinton Democrats of treason for merely talking to Russian officials. And in the ongoing Russiagate hysteria, the mainstream media have jettisoned all pretense of balanced and objective journalism.

A striking contrast is the political and MSM coverage of the January 6th assaults on the Capitol and the 2014 firebombing of government buildings and sniper murders of protesters and police by neo-Nazi and other extreme right-wing groups in Kiev’s Maidan (central square), which led to a coup d’état and to the Azov Battalion’s assault in Donbas, but which the American major media outlets chose to largely ignore. With the latest Gallup poll showing that the MSM are less trusted (16% confidence in newspapers, 11% in TV news) than at just about any previous time in history, journalists may want to reconsider their individual roles as crude propagandists for the U.S. proxy war in Ukraine and the corporate state.

The organized U.S. government efforts to destabilize Russia, which began with the Cold War era CIA, has never abated, and Ukraine remains the prime corridor for carrying out the dismemberment of Russian sovereignty. A Rand Corporation study for the U.S. Army in 2019 makes very clear what has caused the conflict in Ukraine, and it’s not the one-sided narrative given by the New York Times and CNN. It’s about beggaring Russia. The report provides the Army (and presumably the White House) with the specific economic, geopolitical, and military tactics and strategy for bringing about this end:

* Hinder Russia’s petroleum exports and the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline to Europe
*Impose greater sanctions and encourage a Russian brain drain
* Increase military intervention in Syria and “promote regime change in Belarus”
*“Exploit tensions in the South Caucasus,” “reduce Russian influence in Central Asia” and “challenge Russian presence in Moldova”
* Increase U.S. and NATO land forces and exercises in Europe”
*“Withdraw from the INF Treaty”
*“Invest in new capabilities to manipulate Russian risk”
*“Provide lethal aid to Ukraine”

Multi-ethnic Ukraine is from the U.S. standpoint little more than a pawn in a global power game by which the U.S. seeks to retain a unipolar position in the world, one in which Russian, Chinese, and Indian assertions of balance of power principles will not be heard by the Empire. The mainstream media (with rare exceptions) refuse to bring up in their reporting these rather open and obvious rules of the game, and that’s because they themselves are invested in the perpetuation of Anglo-American global hegemony and white supremacy.

https://mronline.org/2022/07/30/russia- ... -conflict/

*************************

West prepares to plunder post-war Ukraine with neoliberal shock therapy: privatization, deregulation, slashing worker protections

Western governments and corporations met in Switzerland to plan harsh neoliberal economic policies to impose on post-war Ukraine, calling to cut labor laws, “open markets,” drop tariffs, deregulate industries, and “sell state-owned enterprises to private investors.”


ByJake Kallio and Benjamin NortonPublished4 days ago

Image

While the United States and Europe flood Ukraine with tens of billions of dollars of weapons, using it as an anti-Russian proxy and pouring fuel on the fire of a brutal war that is devastating the country, they are also making plans to essentially plunder its post-war economy.

Representatives of Western governments and corporations met in Switzerland this July to plan a series of harsh neoliberal policies to impose on post-war Ukraine, calling to cut labor laws, “open markets,” drop tariffs, deregulate industries, and “sell state-owned enterprises to private investors.”

Ukraine has been destabilized by violence since 2014, when a US-sponsored coup d’etat overthrew its democratically elected government, setting off a civil war. That conflict dragged on until February 24, 2022, when Russia invaded the country, escalating into a new, even deadlier phase of the war.

The United States and European Union have sought to erase the history of foreign-sponsored civil war in Ukraine from 2014 to early 2022, acting as though the conflict began on February 24. But Washington had sent large sums of weapons to Ukraine and provided extensive military training and support over several years before Russia invaded.

Meanwhile, starting in 2017, representatives of Western governments and corporations quietly held annual conferences in which they discussed ways to profit from the civil war they were fueling in Ukraine.

In these meetings, Western political and business leaders outlined a series of aggressive right-wing reforms they hoped to impose on Ukraine, including widespread privatization of state-owned industries and deregulation of the economy.

On July 4 and 5, 2022, top officials from the US, EU, Britain, Japan, and South Korea met in Switzerland for a so-called “Ukraine Recovery Conference.” There, they planned Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction and performatively announced aid commitments – while salivating over a bonanza of potential contracts.

New NATO candidates Finland and Sweden committed to assure reconstruction in Lugansk, roughly 48 hours after Russia and separatist forces announced the region had fallen fully under their control.

But the Ukraine Recovery Conference was not new. It had been renamed to save the expense of a new acronym. In the previous five years, the group and its annual meetings were instead referred to as the “Ukraine Reform Conference” (URC).

The URC’s agenda was explicitly focused on imposing political changes on the country – namely, “strengthening the market economy“, “decentralization, privatization, reform of state-owned enterprises, land reform, state administration reform,” and “Euro-Atlantic integration.”

Image

Before 2022, this gathering had nothing to do with aid – and a lot to do with economics.

Documents from the 2018 Ukraine Reform Conference emphasized the importance of privatizing most of Ukraine’s remaining public sector, stating that the “ultimate goal of the reform is to sell state-owned enterprises to private investors”, along with calls for more “privatization, deregulation, energy reform, tax and customs reform.”

Lamenting that the “government is Ukraine’s largest asset holder,” the report stated, “Reform in privatization and SOEs has been long awaited, as this sector of the Ukrainian economy has remained largely unchanged since 1991.”

Image

The Ukraine Reform Conference listed as one of its “achievements” the adoption of a law in January 2018 titled “On Privatization of State and Municipal Property,” which it noted “simplifies the procedure of privatization.”

While the URC enthusiastically pushed for these neoliberal reforms, it acknowledged that they were very unpopular among actual Ukrainians. A poll found that just 12.4% supported privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOE), whereas 49.9% opposed it. (An additional 12% were indifferent, whereas 25.7% had no answer.)

Image

Economic liberalization in Ukraine since Russia’s February invasion has been even more grim.

In March 2022, the Ukrainian parliament adopted emergency legislation allowing employers to suspend collective agreements. Then in May, it passed a permanent reform package effectively exempting the vast majority of Ukrainian workers (those at businesses with fewer than 200 employees) from Ukrainian labor law.

While the most immediate beneficiaries of these changes will be Ukrainian employers, Western governments have been lobbying to liberalize Ukraine’s labor laws for years.

Documents leaked in 2021 showed that the British government coached Ukrainian officials on how to convince a recalcitrant public to give up workers’ rights and implement anti-union policies. Training materials lamented that popular opinion towards the proposed reforms was overwhelmingly negative, but provided messaging strategies to mislead Ukrainians into supporting them.

(more...)

https://multipolarista.com/2022/07/28/w ... onference/

**********************

NATO Threat, Strategic Interests, Great Sea Power Status: Key Details on Russia’s New Naval Doctrine
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 31, 2022
Ilya Tsukanov

Image

Post-Soviet Russia’s first naval doctrine was established in 2001 by presidential decree, with a major update approved in 2015 amid rising tensions with NATO, the Ukraine crisis, and Moscow’s growing strategic partnership with China. The new doctrine supersedes the 2015 document and adds a number of important new provisions.

President Vladimir Putin signed a decree approving an updated Naval Doctrine on Sunday as Russia marked Navy Day – a holiday dedicated to the sailors, naval aviation, and coastal troops serving in the maritime branch of the Russian Armed Forces.

“We have transparently marked the borders and zones of Russia’s national interests – including economic, vital and strategic ones,” Putin said during the signing ceremony, which took place at the Peter and Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg.

“First and foremost, these are our Arctic waters, the Black, Okhotsk, Bering and Baltic Seas, as well as the Kuril Straits. We will ensure their protection firmly and by all means,” Putin said. The Navy, he stressed, is tasked with responding “with lightning speed to anyone who decides to encroach on our sovereignty and freedom.”


The updated doctrine, published on the Kremlin’s website on Sunday, lays out the strategic directions and goals of the Navy and commercial maritime fleets in accordance with Russia’s broader national security strategy and military doctrine, and includes principles on the study, development, use, and protection of resources of the world’s oceans, the defense of Russian sovereignty and national interests, measures to guarantee accessibility to world trade routes, and an assessment of risks and threats to Russia.

The document includes a provision outlining the state’s commitment to the “preservation of Russia’s status as a great sea power, whose activities are aimed at preserving strategic stability in the world’s oceans, the strengthening of national influence and the development of mutually beneficial partnership relations in the sphere of maritime activities in conditions of the emerging polycentric world.”

The strengthening of Russia’s Arctic maritime influence, including along the continental shelf, and the development of the Northern Sea Route transport corridor as a national transport artery that’s competitive on the global market, are featured as major national priorities.

US and NATO as Key Strategic Threats

The document pays special attention to the role played by the United States and the North Atlantic Alliance in shaping Russia’s maritime priorities, perceptions of threats, and the means to neutralize these threats.

“Russia’s development in the modern world is taking place against the background of major and new challenges and threats to its national security, connected first and foremost to Russia’s geopolitical status and its role in world politics. Russia’s course for an independent foreign and domestic policy brings about resistance from the United States and its allies, which seek to preserve their global dominance, including in the world’s oceans. Their policy of containing Russia calls for a policy of political, economic, military and informational pressure,” the doctrine states.

The document notes that unfortunately, the factor of naked military power has not disappeared from international affairs, with “major world powers which possess significant naval potential and a developed system of bases continuing to increase their naval presence in geopolitically significant areas of the world’s oceans, including in areas bordering the territory of the Russian Federation.”

The doctrine outlines 10 main threats to Russia in the maritime space:

*The strategic course being pursued by the USA to “dominate” the oceans and Washington’s global influence on the international processes, including those connected to the use of maritime transport arteries and energy resources.
*The push by the US and its allies to try to limit Russia’s access to the resources of the world’s oceans, and vital maritime transport routes.
*Territorial claims against Russia by a number of governments related to some of the country’s coastal areas and islands.
*The deployment of NATO military infrastructure near Russia’s borders, and the growing number of alliance exercises in the sea areas near the country.
*The attempt by the US to reach overwhelming superiority in naval power, as well as rising capabilities of other naval powers.
*Military conflicts in areas of special geopolitical significance to Russia and its allies, as well as countries which have access to the world’s oceans.
*The economic, political, international legal, informational and military pressure on Russia aimed at discrediting or reducing the effectiveness of its maritime activities.
*Efforts by some governments to weaken Russia’s control over the Northern Sea Route, including through the growing presence of foreign military infrastructure in the Arctic.
*Attempts by some countries to change existing international maritime legal agreements in pursuit of selfish geopolitical interests.
*And finally, the growing threat of international terrorism, piracy, and illegal smuggling of weapons, drugs, chemicals, and radioactive substances.

The doctrine outlines several challenges affecting Russia’s maritime activities, including what is perceived to be the country’s insufficient role in maritime transport activities, demonstrated by the low number of ships operating under the Russian state flag in percentage terms. The poor state and small size of the country’s scientific research fleet, and sanctions by a number of governments against Russia’s military shipbuilding and oil and gas sectors, including in the area of cutting-edge technologies, equipment deliveries, and foreign investment, are listed as additional challenges.

Other risks mentioned in the document include an insufficient network of support bases outside Russia for the Russian Navy, the climate crisis, and the threat of pandemics, including the coronavirus. The latter, the doctrine stresses, “has led to geopolitical uncertainty and a global economic crisis connected to the desire by leading foreign governments to alter the current world order, a growing tendency for the termination of processes of globalization, a battle for global leadership, the rising role of national economies and state management, including in the sphere of maritime activity.”

Six Strategic Directions

In light of these threats, risks, and challenges, the doctrine outlines Russia’s goals. These, it says, include the “development of Russia as a great naval power and the strengthening of its position among leading global naval powers,” a requirement for more resources to ensure the country’s national interests in the world’s oceans, in line with the principles and norms of international law. The maintenance of strategic stability, and the defense of Russia’s sovereign rights to its continental shelf, efforts to increase competitiveness of the Russian transport fleet and the Northern Sea Route, and the strengthening of the operational capabilities of the Navy to ensure national security and national interests in the world’s oceans are also listed.

This includes the need to increase the size of and upgrade Russia’s commercial fleet and Navy, the creation of new, large-scale maritime transport and logistics centers at existing ports, and, where possible, expansion of bilateral and international scientific cooperation in the study of the world’s oceans.

The doctrine outlines six strategic priority regions for the Russian Navy, including the Arctic, Pacific, Atlantic (which includes the Baltic, Azov, Black and Mediterranean Seas under its domain), the Caspian Sea, the Indian Ocean and the Antarctic Sea directions. In each area, priorities include the strengthening of the Navy’s capabilities, parrying threats to national security, improving command and control, and, where relevant, creating specialized fleets –including icebreakers, and search and rescue forces.

The Atlantic direction pays particular attention to the threats to Russian security posed by the NATO alliance – particularly its plans to push military infrastructure up to Russia’s borders and attempts to assign the alliance “global functions.” Here, the Navy’s goals are said to include preserving national security and “creating the conditions for stable economic cooperation with foreign governments.”

In the Indian Oceanic strategic direction, priority is paid to the development of the “strategic” naval partnership with India, as well as cooperation with Iran, Iraq, and other regional states, plus a general increase in Russian maritime presence in the region. Similar goals are mentioned in the Pacific, among them the need to expand the Russian Navy’s accessibility to regional ports, and cooperation with regional powers and groups of states in the interests of preserving strategic stability.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... -doctrine/

*************

The Myth of the HIMARS ‘Game Changer’: American-Supplied Rocket System Won’t Bring Victory to Ukraine
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 31, 2022
Scott Ritter

Image

The rocket system is a deadly tool – but it’s not the tonic Ukraine and its supporters claim it to be.

As former US President Donald Trump proved before he was banned by the platform, there’s always a tweet.

“HIMARS have arrived to Ukraine. Thank you to my US colleague and friend @SecDef Lloyd J. Austin III for these powerful tools! Summer will be hot for Russian occupiers. And the last one for some of them.”

Thus wrote Aleksey Reznikov, the Ukrainian minister of defense, on June 23. He followed it up with another tweet on July 4, wishing the American people a “Happy Independence Day” while thanking them for their continued support for the Ukrainian cause. Reznikov highlighted the role being played by HIMARS, which he called “a game changer at the front lines.”

In the weeks following Reznikov’s announcement of the arrival of the US-made M-142 High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), the hype that accompanied the deployment of this new weapon, from both the Ukrainian and Russian sides, does not appear to substantiate the minister’s claim that Kiev now possesses “game changing” technology.

The harsh reality of war is that any modern weapons system, when employed effectively, is capable of inflicting casualties on an opponent.

Igor Strelkov, a pseudonym for Russian nationalist Igor Vsevolodovich Girkin, whose past employers include the FSB (state security service) and the Donetsk People’s Republic’s militia, reported some of the ensuing destruction on his Telegram channel.

“Over the past five to seven days,” he wrote on July 10, “more than 10 large warehouses of artillery and other ammunition, several oil depots, about a dozen command posts and about the same number of personnel locations in our near and deep rear were hit. As well as several air defense and artillery positions. BIG losses in personnel and equipment have been suffered.”

Alexander Sladkov, a military journalist and special correspondent for Vesti VGTRK, a Russian television channel, appeared to confirm Strelkov’s information, posting the following on his own Telegram channel: “Ukrainian missile and artillery have already struck several times at our decision-making centers. With results. The centers are not big, but important.”

Both Strelkov and Sladkov were dismissive of Russia’s response for what they – correctly – describe as a major escalation on the part of Ukraine and its US-NATO supporters.

A typical HIMARS battery, as employed by both the US and NATO, includes nine launchers supported by dozens of other support vehicles. The US has, to date, reportedly provided Ukraine with eight to 12 of these systems, which are manned by specially trained Ukrainian artillerymen who have undergone a three-week training course in Grafenwoehr, Germany, provided by the US Army.

According to the Institute of War, a US-based think tank, “Ukrainian forces are increasingly targeting Russian military infrastructure with indirect fire and US-provided HIMARS systems deep in occupied territory.” It concludes that “the increased ability of Ukrainian forces to target critical Russian military facilities with Western-provided HIMARS demonstrates how Western military aid provides Ukraine with new and necessary military capabilities.”

The Kyiv Independent, a Western state-funded propaganda outlet, reported that “by July 7, Russia had lost most of its key ammunition depots, and many of its smaller depots in occupied Donbas. Notably, many key targets as much as 50-80 kilometers into Russian-controlled territory have been successfully destroyed.”

Max Boot, a Moscow-born military analyst who writes for the Washington Post, was so impressed with the performance of HIMARS that he wrote an op-ed in which he confidently announced “To shorten the War, send 60 HIMARS to Ukraine.”

I mean, if eight HIMARS have brought the vaunted Russian war machine to its knees, imagine what could happen if Ukraine had 60? Wait, there is an answer to that question. In a recent interview with the Sunday Times, Reznikov revealed that Zelensky “had ordered Ukraine’s military to retake occupied coastal areas which are vital to the country’s economy.”

Ukraine, it seems, is winning the war against Russia.

Except, of course, it is not. Not even close. The notion that the HIMARS is a “super weapon” capable of turning the battlefield narrative in eastern Ukraine on its head is, simply put, pure nonsense.

Russia has, over the course of the past three months, perfected the art of war when it comes to defeating the Ukrainian military. John Boyd, the famous American fighter-pilot-turned-military theorist, coined a concept, known as the “OODA-Loop” (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), which represented the phases involved in military operations. The side that could master the OODA-Loop more efficiently than its opponent would “get inside their decision-making cycle,” forcing the enemy to operate in a purely reactive mode, enabling the superior party to achieve victory.

Russia has got “inside the decision-making cycle” of every one of its opponents during the military operation in Ukraine, dominating the conflict economically, politically, and militarily.

HIMARS does not change this reality.

The Russian military, like any successful military organization, is highly adaptive – it must be to survive on the modern battlefield. The conflict in Ukraine is unlike any experienced in modern times, requiring Russian military leaders to adapt operational theory as defined by doctrine to the demanding realities of the eastern Ukrainian front. The fact that approximately 200,000 Russian forces can impose their will on over 700,000 Ukrainian defenders while achieving casualty ratios that are decisively in their favor speaks to the reality of their OODA-Loop dominance.

At the end of the day, HIMARS – and other so-called “advanced Western weapons” – is but a tool wielded by the same actor who has been systematically defeated by the Russian military. This will not change, whether Ukraine employs four, eight, 12… or even 60 HIMARS systems.

First and foremost, the survivability of the HIMARS is a critical factor – Russia excels at destroying Western-provided weaponry. The HIMARS footprint is a large one, with dozens of trucks needed to carry the ammunition used by the launcher. Vehicles need fuel, and ammunition needs protective storage – as do the launchers. This considerable footprint creates a signature which is detectable by any capable intelligence service – and the Russians have capable intelligence services. Indeed, the irony is that the larger the number of HIMARS brought into service by Ukraine, the greater the likelihood of detection and interdiction (i.e. destruction) by Russia.

Already, Moscow has claimed to have destroyed two of the initial four HIMARS systems sent to Ukraine (this assertion has been vehemently denied by both Ukraine and the US.) It also claims to have destroyed several warehouses where HIMARS ammunition was being stored. The point is that Russia is not a passive actor on the military stage. The deployment of HIMARS was not a secret, and Russia had plenty of time to prepare for its appearance on the battlefield. This does not mean Ukraine is not inflicting casualties – HIMARS is a deadly weapon which, employed properly, can inflict death and destruction on its target. According to Kiev, the system was used in a recent attack on a Russian command post that killed a senior general officer (the Kremlin has not confirmed this result.)

Pro-Russian military analysts say the effectiveness of HIMARS has been enhanced through a tactic which involves the Ukrainian military firing off several salvos of long-range multiple-launch rocket systems. This prompts Russian surface-to-air missiles to engage over the intended target. Ukrainian forces then fire off the HIMARS rockets, which are able to penetrate the overwhelmed Russian air defense network.

The Russian military, however, is highly adaptive. It won’t take long for an adequate tactical answer to the HIMARS problem to be developed and employed. In the meantime, Russian military operations continue unabated throughout Donbass, with Moscow’s forces continuing their lethal domination of their Ukrainian opponents.

With all due respect, Aleksey Reznikov, HIMARS is not a game changer.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... o-ukraine/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 02, 2022 1:16 pm

“These are Animals, Not People”: Zelensky Frees Convicted Child Rapists, Torturers to Reinforce Depleted Military
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 31, 2022
ESHA KRISHNASWAMY

Image

Once condemned by Ukrainian officials and imprisoned for sadistic torture and the rape of minors, leaders of the notorious Tornado Battalion are free under Volodymyr Zelensky’s orders.

After banning virtually his entire political opposition, publishing a blacklist of foreign journalists and academics accused of advancing “Russian propaganda,” and ramming through a law exempting 70% of Ukrainians from workplace protections, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy has freed from prison fascist militants convicted of some of the most heinous crimes the country has seen since World War II.

According to a July 11 report in Ukrainian media, Ruslan Onishenko, commander of the now-disbanded Tornado Battalion, was freed as part of President Zelensky’s scheme to release prisoners with combat experience. Along with an unwavering commitment to fascism, Onishenko is known as a psychopathic sadist who was involved in sexually assaulting children, brutally torturing prisoners, and murder.

Onishenko’s release follows a February 27 order by Zelensky to free other convicted former Tornado members like Danil “Mujahed” Lyashuk, a fanatic from Belarus who has openly emulated ISIS and boasted of torturing captives for sheer enjoyment. According to Zelensky‘s decree, prisoners with combat experience would be allowed to “compensate for their guilt” by fighting in the “hottest spots.”

Back in 2015, when the Ukrainian state provided official support to his Tornado Battalion, Onishenko texted two fellow “patriots,” Voldomor and Svetlana Savichuk, propositioning Svetlana Savichuk to “suck my cock in front of the [toddler] children.” (See screenshots of the conversation here). He also asked Savichuk to perform lewd acts on her children for his viewing pleasure. Despite the magnitude of his crimes, which included torture, murder, rape – including that of children – kidnapping, amputation, and more, Onishenko was sentenced to a mere 11 years in prison on April 11, 2017.

Now, after serving just five years of his sentence, the convicted predator has been freed by a president hailed by Western patrons as a defender of democracy.

Zelensky’s move is not just a signal of desperation as his military is ground down by Russian forces in the east. It extends the virtual impunity that Ukrainian battalions infested with hardened criminals and neo-Nazis have enjoyed for over eight years as official enforcers of the post-Maidan regime’s rule.

Image
Tornado battalion founder Ruslan Onishenko

As regular units defect after Maidan, battalions fill the gap

Back in February 2014, when the US-backed Euromaidan coup drove out Ukraine’s democratically elected president, the new regime in Kiev faced a crisis. All across the country, military units and local governments were still filled with ethnic Russians and other supposedly “unpatriotic” elements. Ethnic Russian politicians mostly from the east were branded as “radical deputies” and kidnapped, hunted down or otherwise forced to flee.

On February 23, 2014 Oleksandr Valentynovych Turchynov became acting President of Ukraine and enacted sweeping legislation without an electoral or constitutional mandate. Across Ukraine, a majority of citizens refused to recognize the legitimacy of the new coup regime. Areas east of the Dnieper river inhabited by a large number of Russian speakers, Jews, Muslims, and other national minorities would soon become targets of right-wing paramilitaries like Onishenko’s Tornado battalion.

In the eastern cities of Lugansk, Donetsk, Mariupol, Odessa and Kharkiv, residents besieged local government buildings and buildings of the Ukrainian security services to create pressure for a referendum on independence. Neither the local military nor the police tried to stop these protesters.

According to a 2016 US military report:

Certainly, no armed resistance was met by the pro-Russian forces in the beginning. In fact, the true situation on the ground was even worse. According to the Ukrainian interior minister, up to 70 percent of police in the region had allowed or actively assisted the building takeovers.

When the post-Maidan government refused to give these citizens either a referendum or meaningful representation in the government, two of the eastern regional Oblasts, Donetsk and Lugansk, declared independence.

The post-Maidan government’s crisis of legitimacy grew when Ukrainian military units sent to Donetsk to quell the rebellion ended up defecting to the side of the anti-Maidan coup residents. Desperate to save his new regime, the unelected interim President Oleksandr Turchynov announced large-scale anti-terrorist operations in order to “quell the terrorists” in the east. Yet the Ukrainian military remained obstinate, largely refusing to follow Kiev’s orders.

In April 2014, the 25th separate airborne brigade of the High Mobility Assault Forces of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was sent to Donetsk to wage war on its residents. However, in the words of the embittered interim-president Turchynov on April 17, 2014 at the Verkhovna Rada, “the 25th separate Airborne Brigade, whose military showed cowardice and surrendered arms, will be disestablished… The Defense Ministry has received this instruction.”

Turchynov sent a corresponding order to the Prosecutor-General’s office demanding the criminal punishment of the disobedient servicemen. While the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense denied that the brigade defected to the side of the separatists, the unit’s tanks began to fly the flag of the DNR, as even mainstream Western media reported.

Days after the interim President “disbanded” the 25th Brigade, the newly installed “deputy governor” of Dnipropetrovsk announced the formation of “special forces” in order to “protect the oblast” from falling into “Russia’s hands.” While the median Ukrainian salary for 2014 was 3480₴ ($117 USD), “volunteers” for these battalions, according to the Deputy Governor of the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Hennadiy Korban, received 29528₴ ($1000) per month. That’s nearly ten times the average salary in Ukraine.

After the loss of parts of the Oblasts of Lugansk and Donetsk and the entire peninsula of Crimea, Kiev believed that Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, with its large Russian-speaking population, would be the next Oblast to declare independence. Unable to rely on the Ukrainian military, nor the current police force, which they deemed to be “infiltrated by pro-Russian separatists,” Kiev officially deputized the fascistic paramilitary forces that functioned as street muscle during the Maidan coup.

In March 2014, Kiev passed a law establishing a “national guard” which was to be overseen by the Ministry of the Interior. With the consent of the then-Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, Ukrainian billionaire Igor Kholmoisky bankrolled the creation of some of the country’s more notorious territorial defense forces. The first of these “special police battalions,” Dnipro-1, was born from the oligarch’s fortune. One of Kholmoisky’s deputies, Boris Filatov, stated that the goal of these special battalions was to “knit the country back together.”

Instead, the special battalions (Dobrobats) recruited from the core of Maidan activists who battled the deposed president’s riot police. Oleg Lyashko, a self-styled “people’s deputy” who founded the Radical Party and appeared on the main stage during the Euromaidan pro-coup rallies, attempted to establish his own Dobrobat named “Ukraine.” Because Lyaschko did not have the money to finance a formal battalion, his group would have to audition for support from oligarchs by volunteering to fight in the city of Torez in the Donetsk Oblast.

By this time, Ruslan Onishenko was known as a career criminal with three convictions for robbery, hooliganism, and unlawful imprisonment (kidnapping) under his belt. Born Ruslan Abalmaz, he adopted the family name of his wife, “Onishenko,” after Euromaidan. As a native of Torez, he became a central figure in the “test formation” of Lyashko’s new battalion.

The plan to retake Torez from the separatists failed, however, prompting Onishenko and his crew to flee to the neighboring city of Dnepropetrovsk, the home of billionaire Igor Kholmoisky. Eventually, with the support of Minister of Interior Arsen Avakov and his deputy, right-wing political fixer Anton Gerashenko, Onishenko was able to convince Kholmoisky to finance a new battalion called “Shaktorysk.”

In June 2014, a public relations campaign for the Shaktyorsk Battalion began on EspressoTv, the unofficial outlet of the “special battalions,” as well as on UkroTV, lionizing Onishenko as “the one man who struggles for the soul of the country”

Image
Ruslan Onishenko’s break out moment on Ukraine’s Espresso TV

That same month, Shaktorysk fighters underwent training under the auspices of the regional police headquarters. On July 8, 2014, the newly minted police unit officially “graduated” and took its oath of office before being posted to Mariupol.

According to former SBU agent turned whistleblower Vassily Prozorov, “From the decision of Interior Minister Arsen Avakov to establish special police ‘patrol’ units within the structure of the ministry of the interior (MVD), these divisions began to appear like mushrooms after a rainy day.” The special battalions grew from only two in the days after Euromaidan to fifty-nine within several months.

Image
Onishenko training for combat(Note: those are Beretta pistols, US Army issue.)

Seven days before graduating from its training camp, Shaktoyrsk battalion members flaunted their sadistic tendencies. On July 1, just a week before the unit’s training ended, a local civilian named Ruslan Kyrenkov was visiting a friend’s house when he was accosted by “a gang of men with weapons.” They dragged him out of the home, claiming he was a separatist, and took him to one of their secret basement prisons. While his ordeal only lasted two days, he told this reporter, “it felt like fifteen days.”

Kyrenkov was tied to a chair, while a masked member of the battalion whipped out a blow torch and seared the flesh on the chest and arms. He was tortured for three days straight. Even today, he bears the scars of his torture. “They used to be much darker,” he said of his third degree wounds, “but now they have lightened up”

This is how they find separatists.

They find random people and set them on fire with a blow torch until their skin melts. https://t.co/u1jp5ERRo3 pic.twitter.com/I1T1a3g8yk

— Esha K (@eshaLegal) July 23, 2022


The Shaktoyrsk Battalion was hardly unique in its barbarism. Many of the special battalions operated with total impunity while their commanders raked in money by engaging in smuggling of virtually any good, knowing they could always establish a monopoly through brute violence.

For example, in July 2015, the Right Sektor operated a tobacco smuggling cartel in the city of Mukachevo. When a conflict erupted between two factions of the far-right unit, a shoot-out ensued, and police attempted to intervene.

According to the local prosecutor’s office:

On July 11 in Mukachevo at about 14:00, 20 armed persons in camouflage with the labels “Right Sector” and similar stickers on their automobiles came to an appointment with local residents in a cafe for the purpose of divvying up spheres of influence. A conflict broke out and the armed men began shooting from firearms at the above-mentioned establishment. According to preliminary information 6 policemen and 3 civilians suffered gunshot wounds of various degrees of severity. Five of the armed men with the ‘Right Sector’ labels also suffered injuries.”

However, Right Sektor members wound up escaping from the police, who were unable to disarm them. After the police pursued the armed gang, Right Sektor retaliated by taking a 6 year old boy hostage. In July 25 2015, after failing to disarm the Right Sektor, Interior Minister Arseniy Avakov suspended the police-chief in Mukachevo. Now the right-wing gang could not only pursue its tobacco smuggling activities without official harassment, it could decide who would be next to lead the local police.

Along with total impunity, the right-wing paramilitaries were provided with a seemingly endless store of weapons by the US. Then-comedian Zelensky made light of the trend in one of his nationally televised comedy routines. In one especially notable bit, Zelensky played a cop in the post-Maidan police whose sole qualification for the job was being the nephew of the police chief.

In Zelensky’s routine, a hapless unit of rookie cops accidentally blows up an expensive tank. “Don’t worry, America will replace it,” they declare with a casual shrug.

Image
Comedian Volodymyr Zelensky mocks the corruption of Ukraine’s post-Maidan police

As president, Zelensky seems to have forgotten the damage done to his country by out-of-control, completely unaccountable Dobrobats – and has authorized their ongoing rampage.

Tornado forms amidst military failure

In August 2014, the Shakhtyorsk Battalion of Ruslan Onishenko participated in another ill-fated operation by the Ukrainian government to take back a separatist-controlled area, this time in the eastern town of Ilovaisk. In the end, the Ukrainian Dobrobats were surrounded by fighters from the Donetsk People’s Militia and forced to abort their mission. The painful defeat was a major factor in forcing Ukraine’s coup government into negotiations with the breakaway Donbass republics under the guidelines of the Minsk Accords.

Strangely, despite retreating with its collective tail between its legs, Onishenko’s Shakhtyorsk Battalion received a commendation from Interior Minister Arseny Avakov for its supposed bravery in Ilovaisk. Yet only a month later, in September 2014, President Poroshenko and other cabinet members suddenly handed down a decision to disband Shakhtyorsk, accusing it of looting.

In a confusing statement, Avakov declared, “While fighting beautifully within Ilovasky, the Shakhtyorsk battalion was disbanded under my orders because of many cases of looting in Volnovakha and other situations in nearby places.”

The Shakhtyorsk battalion was thus split into two groups: one which called itself “Saint Mary, and a second led by Onishenko called “Tornado,” which consisted largely of pro-Maidan residents of Lugansk and Donetsk, as well as some foreigners.

In the meantime, under four waves of mobilization in 2015, Ukraine attempted to expand its regular armed forces from 130,000 to the “official count” of 230,000. However, the haphazard nature of the recruitment only managed to entice soldiers who were unable to effectively engage in any combat operations. In March 2015, Yuri Birukov, one of the advisors to then-Ukrainian President and billionaire oligarch Petro Poroshenko, stated on Facebook that Ukraine managed to recruit a large number of “alcoholics, dodgers, drug addicts and morons.”

In the Donbass region in 2015 alone, the Ukrainian armed forces saw over 16,000 cases of desertion. Some of these defections occurred after a law passed that year which authorized commanding officers to legally shoot deserters.

The Ukrainian government was increasingly forced to turn to extremist Dobrobats like Tornado and psychotic leaders like Onishenko for help in battling the eastern separatists.

Image
Tornado leader Ruslan Oshinenko

“This unit is out of control”: Ukrainian officials and State Department-sponsored human rights reports detail Tornado’s unbelievable sadism

Tornado, like the other Dobrobats, recruited a mix of far-right fanatics and hardened criminals. Its ranks included the Belarussian extremist Danil Lyashuk, who went by the call-sign “Mujahed” and has made claims claims about converting to Islam and supporting ISIS. While it is unclear whether Lyashuk actually served in ISIS, he has openly emulated the Islamist militia’s appetite for unhinged sadism. In one 2015 audio recording, Lyashuk proclaimed, “without torture, life isn’t living.” This became his motto.

Danil Lyashuk al-Takbir, known as “Mujahid” is a Belarusian far-right extremist, Muslim convert, and ISIS sympathizer who fought with the defunct Ukrainian MVS special unit “Tornado” Battalion in Donbass. In 2015, he was arrested for multiple war crimes and sentenced to 10 years. pic.twitter.com/yD0LvXiTdt

— Freelancers (@cbtfreelancers) June 30, 2021


Immediately after its official formation, some of the members of Tornado began selling their weapons on the black market. On November 2, 2014, six fighters from Tornado were recalled by Kiev, disarmed and reassigned to the eastern Oblast of Zaporizhya. There, they attempted to extort money from the mayor, Alexander Sin. However, he stood firm and demanded that the Tornado battalion be transferred out of his region. Sin was predictably met with accusations of corruption, separatism and treason by radical nationalist elements, but in the end, he secured the extremists’ transfer to the Lugansk Oblast, which was still under the control of Kiev in 2015.

The Kharkiv Human Rights Group authored a report on behalf of the US Department of State detailing the terror imposed on locals by Tornado’s “daily patrols” in Lugansk:

People wearing camouflage, carrying machine guns, knocked out doors, broke into private homes, conducted searches (without permission from judges), “requisitioned” valuables, humiliated and beat owners, and threatened to shoot them. They grabbed people from the streets and checkpoints, and with bags over their heads, they were taken to basements, where they “conducted work on identifying separatism” amongst the residents of the village.

The State Department-commissioned reported continued:

Many men were taken forcibly from their homes and taken under escort to the building of the railway hospital in Novaya Kondrashovka. Most of the detainees were released, but there have been cases of people disappearing after being illegally detained by battalion fighters. Between the summer of 2014 and the end of 2016, there were 11 known cases of missing residents of Stanytsia Luhanska.

On January 3, 2015, two Lugansk locals, Sergey Valuveskii and his friend, Kosta, fell victim to the Tornado battalion during a routine visit to a shop in the village of Mareko. To the locals’ astonishment, the store was filled with a column of men dressed in military gear, with their faces covered, bearing fully-loaded automatic rifles. Valuveskii told one of the masked men in the store, “You’re standing there with a machine gun and showing off in front of a girl.”

This seemingly innocuous comment was enough for the masked militiamen to drag both Valuveskii and Kosta out of the store and beat them senseless with the butts of their machine guns. Eventually, they were thrown inside of a van and taken to a basement of the hospital in Novaya Kondrashova. After two weeks of torture, he returned home so disfigured that his wife was unable to recognize him.

While Onishenko now roams free thanks to Zelensky’s official order, several Lugansk locals who incurred his unit’s wrath remain in prison on the most specious grounds. A particularly disturbing example of Tornado’s cruelty occurred following an explosion at a checkpoint in the town of Stanitsa Luganskaya that killed a 36-year-old soldier in January 2015. A full month after the deadly blast, the Tornado Battalion detained a 65-year old pensioner named Nikolay Ruban. According to claims by Markiyan Lubkivsky, adviser to the chairman of Ukraine’s SBU intelligence agency, the pensioner was caught “red-handed” carrying a “TNT” and a fuse concealed in a jar of honey.

Nikolay Ruban was subsequently tortured in an underground make-shift prison maintained by the Tornado battalion, according to a fellow prisoner’s account.

“I saw him, this grandfather, who was later convicted for holding a jar of honey at a roadblock,” the former cellmate told the Kharkiv Human Rights Group. “He was also in the basement of Motobond at the same time we were detained. First of all, the grandfather was beaten badly. He was almost naked and completely barefoot. His clothes were torn. He was crying all the time and asked me to explain why he was detained. They came to beat him every two hours. Different people came in each time. When [a cellmate] and I were released, he was still there. So were the other prisoners. What happened to them afterwards,I don’t know. When it became known that he was sentenced to 15 years, I was shocked.”

Ruban was soon transferred to the custody of SBU, where after a year, during a highly suspect trial in which the lone piece of evidence was his possession of a jar of honey, he was sentenced to 15 years of prison for committing acts of terrorism. He also apparently confessed to being a Russian spy who had contacts with the GRU.

Another local named Sergey Petrinko claimed that the Tornado Battalion “took him and a friend in broad daylight, in the middle of the afternoon.” In the battalion’s dungeon, he lost track of time and fell into a terrified stupor. “Some were always there,” Petrinko recalled. “Some were brought in, some were taken away, some were ransomed.” He also testified that foxes in the woods had dug up bones of another acquaintance whose corpse was dumped after dying in Tornado’s torture chamber.

On top of these acts of cruelty, Tornado battalion members have boasted of extreme sexual violence, including the rape of small children. It was the unit’s penchant for perversion that likely prompted the June 2015 Interior Ministry order to disband them.

However, the Ukrainian government was in for a surprise when it realized it did not have the authority to control these battalions after all. Following the order to disband and search the bases of Tornado, deputy Interior Minister Anton Gerashenko appeared on the pro-opposition Channel 112 to complain about the extremist paramilitary he had personally deputized. ​​”There is a court order to search the base where the Tornado battalion is located,” Gerashenko stated. “If someone allows himself not to comply with the court order, in this case, this unit is out of control.”

Later, in June 18, 2015, the chief military prosecutor Anatoliy Matios reported that the Tornado fighters refused to disarm and barricaded themselves inside their base in a school in Severodonetsk.

The Ukrainian authorities were finally able to arrest Onishenko at the Donetsk airport. His brothers-in-arms responded by refusing for several days to obey orders from Kiev, blocking investigators from entering their base to conduct searches, and threatening armed resistance if law enforcement attempted to do so with the use of force.

In the midst of the crisis, Gennadiy Moskal, then-chairman of the Lugansk Military-Civil Administration, reported that the Tornado battalion fighters had taken up defensive positions and deployed military equipment in preparation for a battle with Kiev. Eventually, after sending other Ukrainian military units, the rogue battalion was finally quelled and its members arrested.

A real life horror film unfolds at the Tornado battalion’s trial

Following the arrests, the Ukrainian chief prosecutor found evidence of hideous crimes committed by various members of the Battalion. On the phone of Daniel “Mujahed” Lyshook, the prosecutor found a video (at 2:23) of two other members of the Tornado battalion raping a third man in two separate orifices. Lyshook claimed during his trail that he ordered the horrific rape because he found it amusing.

During the 2016 trials, another kidnapped victim testified that he was chained to a giant yellow ball for weeks (see after the 10 minute mark). The court proceedings also brought forth sickening images from the phones of the Tornado fighters showing disfigured women and rotting corpses littering military bases.

The trial of the Tornado battalion saw testimony by 111 witnesses along with evidence scattered within the areas of Lugansk, at least 80 bodies, attributable to Tornado violence. The judges were overwhelmed with pictures of mutilated genitalia, castrations and other forms of sexual torture.

Image
Photo presented during the trial of Tornado members shows a torture victim whose are was tattooed with the shape of male genitals

One witness exhibited a scar on his arm: a penis and two testicles sadistically etched onto his left arm by a Tornado member with a carving knife (see photo above). In the gallery, a mother was forced to hear testimony of how her son was brutally raped by the battalion before he was killed. Witnesses described how a ten-year old girl was kidnapped for ransom and repeatedly raped on film until she died a little over a week after she was seized.

The government of Kiev reacted with obligatory condemnation of the Tornado goons, painting them as a collection of bad apples that did not reflect on the overall character of the Ukrainian military.

Tatyana Chornovil, a Euromaidan activist and former member of the ultra-nationalist Aidar Battalion, took to channel 112 shortly before the trial to issue a dramatic declaration: “The Tornado commanders were arrested and their cell phones were seized. This is a video of various sexual orgies, rapes. And I would even say that there were newborn babies. I understand that the mother with this newborn was forced to do this under the threat of death of her child. There were rapes of underage girls. These are animals, not people.”

Now, Zelensky is letting the “animals” out of their cages under the cover of war.

Though Tornado’s members represent some of the wildest beasts to have stalked the public, 58 other battalions just like it remain operational across Ukraine.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... -military/

******************

On the Seversk-Artyomovsk line
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/02/2022

Image

Original Article: Alexander Kots / Komsomolskaya Pravda

They speak of him as the most daring explorer of the Second Army Corps of the RPL. The first to go into the fire and the first to jump into the water, always in the front line with his soldiers. He has been injured, he has suffered bruises. Although as the commander of the reconnaissance company of the 7th Brigade, he could command the unit from a distance. In my head I had imagined a man with a broken head and full of weapons, so when I was greeted by a modest and intelligent officer, I did not immediately realize that he was the legendary Miron , hero of the Lugansk People's Republic. He was awarded the most valor medal for the capture of Rubezhnoe, where his company suffered its first casualties in years: seven people. Now, Miron 's scoutsthey fight on the Seversk-Artyomovsk line and, according to their commander, with each stage of the confrontation, they manage to master new tactics.

“We are used to urban warfare conditions and there is a lot of open space here. The enemy has checkpoints in basements and there are many cameras outside. At first, we did not understand from where the enemy was hunting us. Then we found out and started destroying them with precision attacks.”

"You captured the town of Berestovoe somewhat recklessly."

“More like a trick. We just calculated their schedules and realized that they are not used to fighting at four in the morning. We worked with the artillery, hung up a smokescreen and stormed in with six infantry vehicles, turned around, spread out the flanks and started sweeping. During the day, the reserves arrived, reinforcements with tanks, infantry vehicles and we liberated the town that same afternoon”.

We are sitting on a lookout looking at the images from one of the drones on a phone screen. Berestovoe itself, where Miron 's soldiers have dug in, is under fire from enemy artillery. First action, then reaction. The opponent doesn't skimp on ammo, the Grads rain down in packs. Helicopters drop shells and the entire town is covered in smoke. It seems that there can be nothing alive left there. But according to lively reports from the scene, no casualties have been recorded. The soldiers take refuge in cellars and simple trenches. They are holes one square meter and one and a half meters deep. The day before I had been sitting in one of them waiting for the mortar attack to end during the evacuation of a Ukrainian tank from the gray area .. Little entertaining.

I agree that the phrase “a location has been occupied and positions are being held” doesn't sound very exciting. But behind that are long hours of military work, which is not carried out by elite special forces, but by ordinary people. Like Bublik , from the 1st Battalion of the 7th Brigade. Before the war, he was a miner. At 47, he looks much older, perhaps because of the bushy white beard. He is a frank and direct man. Worse, it turns out that a little chat on the run at the front says a lot more about the people who are fighting than hour-long in-depth interviews at the rear.

“They are angry, they bite, but we can still beat them,” smiles Bublik , referring to the opponent. "The Will of Victory".

"Where are you from?"

“De Krasny Luch” [on the border between the DPR and the RPL east of Donetsk- Ed ].

"This is almost your birthplace."

“Of course, Donbass, everything is my land. In civilian life, I'm a miner. Well, who are we who are here in general? All miners and farmers. Come on, ordinary people."

"What, will we win?"

"Where are we going? If not, why have you started all this? Of course, there is a lot of blood being spilled in all of this, but there is no way to do it any other way. War is war, come what may. The main thing is faith, aspirations.”

“Where do you get faith from?”

"From where? My grandparents also fought once and at first they also suffered, but they believed that they would win. And they won. We are his descendants. I don't want to just shoot, but they can't come to this land, which partly belongs to me, kill people, lock children in cellars. How did they say? Our children will go to school and theirs will be in basements. I don't like kids in basements. I also want them to be able to go to the forest for mushrooms, for strawberries, without being afraid of running into a mine. I want them to go with confidence, as I did as a child, without worries and without paying attention to anything else. But now the children are afraid to go out alone because they can find a landmine anywhere. And that can't happen. It has to be like when I was a child: I would get up, wash my face and go out to the pond to swim in the summer or go sledding or ski in the winter”.

"What did you do to get the medal for courage?"

"I do not know how to say it. It may be for bravery. I am a bit crazy by nature, I was not afraid to go anywhere and to fulfill all kinds of tasks. Probably because of that."

Maxim was a veterinarian in the past. He has worked in a meat processing factory and on chicken farms. In 2014, he went to help the wounded and became a kind of military surgeon at the front and the main medical service of the unit. Look at Bublik with respect.

“We have impressive people”; He says. “There are those who have had a leg blown off, which is hanging from the skin and they say: nothing happens. Can I have a drink or smoke a cigarette? tough guys. They brought us another from the battle and said: Why have you dragged me here? Anesthesia and back . There is a lot like this and they are the first to leave our ranks forever. These are kids who have been hurt many times, come back and get hurt again, this time more seriously. They haven't had time to recover, they stop treatment, they don't heal and they come back. But you have to celebrate those guys somehow."

Meanwhile, Miron receives reports from the different positions. He went to war at the age of 19, shortly after the outbreak of the war. He started at Alexey Mozgovoy 's legendary Prizrak right there in Lisichansk. He says there were a lot of local soldiers, so it was easier to break through the enemy. He speaks frankly about his motivation: “I want the children to go to school and learn Russian. We have lived all our lives in a Russian-speaking environment. My father is Russian, my mother is Russian. We want a normal world and a normal future for our families. We didn't go for them, they came for us. Now we are defending our homes. We have held on for eight years, but we are tired of holding on. Now we will expel all of them, until they tell us to stop.”

"Where do you think we should stop?"

“Where is it going to be? In Kyiv. We have to go all the way to kyiv, to the top. Because everything comes from there. What did our grandparents fight for? For us to do well, for us to have a normal life, a normal country. But it turns out our grandparents didn't finish the job, so we'll finish off the Germans ."

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/08/02/25191/#more-25191

Google Translator

*******************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Сolonelcassad
❗️🇷🇺🇺🇦 Offensive on Donbass: the situation in the east of Ukraine
by the end of August 1, 2022

▪️In the morning hours, the RF Armed Forces attacked Ukrainian positions in Senkovka , Chernihiv region , as well as Pavlovka, Staraya Guta, and Belopolye in Sumy region.

▪️In the Kharkiv region , there were no significant changes on the front line.
➖In the vicinity of Molodova, Velikaya Babka and the dam of the Vyalovsky reservoir , the Armed Forces of Ukraine are equipping firing positions, and minefields are being set up on the outskirts of the settlements of Chepel and Zaliman .
➖In Kharkiv , on the basis of the Aerorazvedka public organization, a joint situational center was formed, which included representatives of the Ministry of Defense, the Security Service of Ukraine, the Main Intelligence Directorate, as well as foreign advisers.
➖The RF Armed Forces carried out massive strikes at targets in Kharkov and Merefa at night.

▪️In the Donbass , the parties are preparing for a further offensive by the allied forces in the Bakhmut (Artemovsk) direction . There are fights in the suburbs of Donetsk controlled by the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
➖Russian troops attacked the positions of the Ukrainian army in Kramatorsk and Konstantinovka.
➖In the vicinity of Bakhmut (Artemovsk), Ukrainian formations are equipping defensive positions in anticipation of a further offensive by the allied forces.
➖Allied forces advance on the outskirts of Soledar.
➖During positional battles, the NM DPR and the RF Armed Forces advanced to the southern outskirts of Avdiivka and reached the southeastern regions of the settlement of Peski.
➖As a result of several strikes by the RF Armed Forces on the positions of the 66th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the line of contact, the losses amounted to more than 50 people killed and wounded.
➖Ukrainian artillery attacked the cities of the Donetsk agglomeration , including cluster munitions with “petal mines”.

▪️There are also no significant changes on the front line in the Zaporozhye direction .
➖In the vicinity of Lugovskoye, the RF Armed Forces discovered a DRG of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which suffered losses during the ensuing battle and retreated.
➖Units of the 44th separate artillery brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will use the RQ-20 Puma UAV to open the positions of the Russian Armed Forces and target artillery at the Zherebyanka-Orekhov and Voskresenka-Gulyaipole line.

▪️In the Kryvyi Rih direction, the Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to prepare for the attack on Kherson.
➖Until August 10, units of the 57th Ompbr , withdrawn from the Donetsk direction, will often be transferred to the Krivoy Rog district to the front .
➖ATGM crews arrived at Ukrainian positions in Ivanovka, Knyazevka, Potemkino and Osokorovka to strengthen the defensive lines.

Image

******************

Why the West Got it Wrong on Russia
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 1, 2022
Scott Ritter

Image

“Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.” This ageless truism is very much in play today as the West struggles to comprehend the scope and scale of its failure first in deterring Russia from invading Ukraine, and then in compelling it to alter course post-invasion. Almost without exception, geopolitical analysts failed to forecast events accurately and policymakers failed to craft policies capable of influencing these events. Figuring out why this failure occurred is essential if there is to be any hope of finding an effective off-ramp from the current crisis. And a new approach is also needed to avoid yet another repeat.

As Russia enters the sixth month of its war in Ukraine, the world is struggling to come to grips with the reality of what is transpiring on the ground in that beleaguered nation. There continues to be a belief among Ukraine’s Western supporters that, if Kyiv is provided with enough modern heavy weaponry, it will somehow be able to pull a rabbit of the hat, transforming what appears to be a Russian military advantage into a Ukrainian victory.

Likewise, the Western “collective” — the EU, US, G7 and Nato — continues to press for even more stringent economic sanctions against Russia, with the apparent belief that such action will, at some point, have sufficient impact on the Russian economy to compel a change in policy by Moscow.

Finally, by doubling down on policies enacted in response to the Russian invasion, Western political leaders continue to act as if the economic consequences will not translate into political consequences at home.

Failed Efforts

The facts on the ground paint a different picture on all three counts. Russia’s armed forces have achieved a level of dominance on the battlefield in eastern Ukraine. Despite extensive efforts by the West to supply Ukraine with modern weaponry, the Russians have a tenfold superiority in artillery, which translates into an ability to deliver devastating precision strikes against Ukrainian military formations, command and control, and logistics targets.

The nature of the war in eastern Ukraine, where Russia enjoys a ten-fold superiority in artillery firepower and near-total control of the tactical airspace, have produced casualty ratios that make a sustained battle, from the Ukrainian perspective, impossible. Ukraine has undergone several rounds of mobilization, with conscription on a massive level. Legislation is being prepared to allow the conscription of some women and allowing for the conscription of men who had previously been exempted due to physical disabilities. Russia, by contrast, has not undertaken a full mobilization, and has committed less than 20% of its combat capacity to the fighting in Ukraine. In short, for those who believe that the Ukrainian conflict will drag on into some sort of stalemate, the facts suggest otherwise. The culminating point of this conflict has already been reached, and there is nothing either Ukraine or its Western supporters can do to prevent a strategic Russian victory.

Western sanctions against Russia, meanwhile, have also failed to have the desired impact. Russia is still facing a recession, but forecasts are being scaled back sharply after high oil and gas revenues and moves to stabilize the economy prevented financial collapse. Certainly, sanctions have not led to capitulation by Moscow. The impact on the West, by contrast, has been far greater: Europe and the US face economic recession, and the crisis has exposed the ugly truth about their dependence on Russian energy and the lack of economically-viable alternatives. Europe is already showing fractures in its façade of unity, as economic reality trumps political posturing. The fact is, things are only going to get worse for Europe and the US on the economic front as the real and meaningful consequences of their collective actions come back to haunt them.

As economies in Europe start to falter, hard realities are being confronted by politicians who have become aware that their future political viability is at risk because of decisions they made on Russia. European unity is eroding as more leaders realize there was never a viable “Plan B” in terms of replacing Russian energy. Anti-Russian sentiment doesn’t heat a home, put food on the table, or provide meaningful employment. This is the new political reality in Europe — one that the EU has yet to fully realize.

Intelligence Failure

The failure of the West to deter Russia and, having failed that, to compel it to alter course by imposing punishing economic sanctions was predictable. And yet, with few exceptions, Western analysts failed to warn political leaders about the probable fate of their policies. The inability or unwillingness to understand the ineffectiveness of the West’s policies and, more critically, the ability of Russia to effectively counter them, represents a failure of intelligence on par with that of a previous generation to foresee the fall of the shah of Iran in 1978-79.

So, how did this come about? The answer is more obvious than one would think. First and foremost, the Western geopolitical community operates in a closed loop, using the same sources of information that have been colored by the same institutional prejudices. Moreover, because these analysts service entities that are core components of what the US calls the “rules-based international order,” they produce self-serving assessments that appeal to their respective masters.

One of the root causes of this collective intelligence failure is the extent to which ideologically driven “Russophobia” has prevented any reality-based assessment of Russian intent and capability. In short, while there is a plethora of analysts who have built a reputation criticizing the Russian government and its leader, President Vladimir Putin, there is a dearth of genuine experts capable of engaging in a detailed assessment of how and why Russian policy is made and implemented. The result is that Russian sources, especially those linked to the Russian government, are given short shrift, while a counter-narrative promulgated by anti-Russian Western “experts” is embraced. Simply put, analysis and policies built on such an intellectual system will be flawed — and doomed to fail.

In the same vein, Western analysts have failed to grasp the consequences of the geopolitical transformation that has already taken place. When Western leaders speak of a post-pandemic “global reset,” they miss the point — the reset has already taken place. Russia and China have rejected the primacy and legitimacy of the so-called “rules-based international order,” instead promoting what they call a “law-based international order” founded in the United Nations Charter. Much of the non-Western world is rallying behind Russia and China in this regard: The Brics forum is expanding in size and relevance, while the G7 and G20 flounder.

One cannot speak of “balanced” and “clear-eyed” analysis when most Western geopolitical assessments of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict have either been proven wrong by events, or so heavily caveated as to be meaningless. As the world struggles to find appropriate policy offramps from this conflict, it is essential to reflect on how and why analysis of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was so wrong, and what can be done to make sure similar failures of intelligence are avoided going forward.

First Principles

First and foremost, analysts should self-screen for existing anti-Russian bias. Likewise, the readiness with which analysts accept, without question, the conclusions and supporting analysis provided by Western governments and institutions must be subjected to increasingly critical scrutiny. Most important, however, is a return to first principles: If someone is being tasked with providing expert opinion and analysis on a subject, they should, indeed, be an expert in that. There is a dearth of genuine experts in Russia providing analysis for Western publications.

Russian sources must be accessed and considered in full by analysts equipped by training and expertise to responsibly deal with the material involved. While blind parroting of a Russian government position is never acceptable practice, recognizing that Russian data may, in fact, be the most accurate available on a given topic, and then incorporating that data into a broader, critical analysis, will produce outcomes that have a far greater chance of withstanding the test of time. This should be the goal of any analyst. Unfortunately, when it comes to Russia, far too many are falling short of that mark.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/08/ ... on-russia/

*******************

NATO Threat, Strategic Interests, Great Sea Power Status: Key Details on Russia’s New Naval Doctrine
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 31, 2022
Ilya Tsukanov

Image

Post-Soviet Russia’s first naval doctrine was established in 2001 by presidential decree, with a major update approved in 2015 amid rising tensions with NATO, the Ukraine crisis, and Moscow’s growing strategic partnership with China. The new doctrine supersedes the 2015 document and adds a number of important new provisions.

President Vladimir Putin signed a decree approving an updated Naval Doctrine on Sunday as Russia marked Navy Day – a holiday dedicated to the sailors, naval aviation, and coastal troops serving in the maritime branch of the Russian Armed Forces.

“We have transparently marked the borders and zones of Russia’s national interests – including economic, vital and strategic ones,” Putin said during the signing ceremony, which took place at the Peter and Paul Fortress in St. Petersburg.

“First and foremost, these are our Arctic waters, the Black, Okhotsk, Bering and Baltic Seas, as well as the Kuril Straits. We will ensure their protection firmly and by all means,” Putin said. The Navy, he stressed, is tasked with responding “with lightning speed to anyone who decides to encroach on our sovereignty and freedom.”


The updated doctrine, published on the Kremlin’s website on Sunday, lays out the strategic directions and goals of the Navy and commercial maritime fleets in accordance with Russia’s broader national security strategy and military doctrine, and includes principles on the study, development, use, and protection of resources of the world’s oceans, the defense of Russian sovereignty and national interests, measures to guarantee accessibility to world trade routes, and an assessment of risks and threats to Russia.

The document includes a provision outlining the state’s commitment to the “preservation of Russia’s status as a great sea power, whose activities are aimed at preserving strategic stability in the world’s oceans, the strengthening of national influence and the development of mutually beneficial partnership relations in the sphere of maritime activities in conditions of the emerging polycentric world.”

The strengthening of Russia’s Arctic maritime influence, including along the continental shelf, and the development of the Northern Sea Route transport corridor as a national transport artery that’s competitive on the global market, are featured as major national priorities.

US and NATO as Key Strategic Threats

The document pays special attention to the role played by the United States and the North Atlantic Alliance in shaping Russia’s maritime priorities, perceptions of threats, and the means to neutralize these threats.

“Russia’s development in the modern world is taking place against the background of major and new challenges and threats to its national security, connected first and foremost to Russia’s geopolitical status and its role in world politics. Russia’s course for an independent foreign and domestic policy brings about resistance from the United States and its allies, which seek to preserve their global dominance, including in the world’s oceans. Their policy of containing Russia calls for a policy of political, economic, military and informational pressure,” the doctrine states.

The document notes that unfortunately, the factor of naked military power has not disappeared from international affairs, with “major world powers which possess significant naval potential and a developed system of bases continuing to increase their naval presence in geopolitically significant areas of the world’s oceans, including in areas bordering the territory of the Russian Federation.”

The doctrine outlines 10 main threats to Russia in the maritime space:

*The strategic course being pursued by the USA to “dominate” the oceans and Washington’s global influence on the international processes, including those connected to the use of maritime transport arteries and energy resources.
*The push by the US and its allies to try to limit Russia’s access to the resources of the world’s oceans, and vital maritime transport routes.
*Territorial claims against Russia by a number of governments related to some of the country’s coastal areas and islands.
*The deployment of NATO military infrastructure near Russia’s borders, and the growing number of alliance exercises in the sea areas near the country.
*The attempt by the US to reach overwhelming superiority in naval power, as well as rising capabilities of other naval powers.
*Military conflicts in areas of special geopolitical significance to Russia and its allies, as well as countries which have access to the world’s oceans.
*The economic, political, international legal, informational and military pressure on Russia aimed at discrediting or reducing the effectiveness of its maritime activities.
*Efforts by some governments to weaken Russia’s control over the Northern Sea Route, including through the growing presence of foreign military infrastructure in the Arctic.
*Attempts by some countries to change existing international maritime legal agreements in pursuit of selfish geopolitical interests.
*And finally, the growing threat of international terrorism, piracy, and illegal smuggling of weapons, drugs, chemicals, and radioactive substances.

The doctrine outlines several challenges affecting Russia’s maritime activities, including what is perceived to be the country’s insufficient role in maritime transport activities, demonstrated by the low number of ships operating under the Russian state flag in percentage terms. The poor state and small size of the country’s scientific research fleet, and sanctions by a number of governments against Russia’s military shipbuilding and oil and gas sectors, including in the area of cutting-edge technologies, equipment deliveries, and foreign investment, are listed as additional challenges.

Other risks mentioned in the document include an insufficient network of support bases outside Russia for the Russian Navy, the climate crisis, and the threat of pandemics, including the coronavirus. The latter, the doctrine stresses, “has led to geopolitical uncertainty and a global economic crisis connected to the desire by leading foreign governments to alter the current world order, a growing tendency for the termination of processes of globalization, a battle for global leadership, the rising role of national economies and state management, including in the sphere of maritime activity.”

Six Strategic Directions

In light of these threats, risks, and challenges, the doctrine outlines Russia’s goals. These, it says, include the “development of Russia as a great naval power and the strengthening of its position among leading global naval powers,” a requirement for more resources to ensure the country’s national interests in the world’s oceans, in line with the principles and norms of international law. The maintenance of strategic stability, and the defense of Russia’s sovereign rights to its continental shelf, efforts to increase competitiveness of the Russian transport fleet and the Northern Sea Route, and the strengthening of the operational capabilities of the Navy to ensure national security and national interests in the world’s oceans are also listed.

This includes the need to increase the size of and upgrade Russia’s commercial fleet and Navy, the creation of new, large-scale maritime transport and logistics centers at existing ports, and, where possible, expansion of bilateral and international scientific cooperation in the study of the world’s oceans.

The doctrine outlines six strategic priority regions for the Russian Navy, including the Arctic, Pacific, Atlantic (which includes the Baltic, Azov, Black and Mediterranean Seas under its domain), the Caspian Sea, the Indian Ocean and the Antarctic Sea directions. In each area, priorities include the strengthening of the Navy’s capabilities, parrying threats to national security, improving command and control, and, where relevant, creating specialized fleets –including icebreakers, and search and rescue forces.

The Atlantic direction pays particular attention to the threats to Russian security posed by the NATO alliance – particularly its plans to push military infrastructure up to Russia’s borders and attempts to assign the alliance “global functions.” Here, the Navy’s goals are said to include preserving national security and “creating the conditions for stable economic cooperation with foreign governments.”

In the Indian Oceanic strategic direction, priority is paid to the development of the “strategic” naval partnership with India, as well as cooperation with Iran, Iraq, and other regional states, plus a general increase in Russian maritime presence in the region. Similar goals are mentioned in the Pacific, among them the need to expand the Russian Navy’s accessibility to regional ports, and cooperation with regional powers and groups of states in the interests of preserving strategic stability.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/07/ ... -doctrine/

****************

Azov officially recognized as a terrorist organization
August 2, 13:51

Image

Ironically, Azov was recognized as a terrorist organization.
In 2022, not in 2014, when it should have been. Braking distance of 8 years. But better late than never. Moreover, now there is an opportunity to prosecute a large number of terrorists from Azov, who are in our captivity after Mariupol, for military and criminal offenses committed.

I remember how 3-4 years ago some readers wrote me letters with puzzled questions "Why haven't they been recognized yet?" And even after the start of the NWO, Volyn was dragged for 5 months (pun intended!). And now the time has come. By the way, in the appendix to the news about the recognition of "Azov" as a terrorist organization, they attach the testimony of one of the Nazis from "Azov", who showed that ritual cannibalism was also practiced in the regiment.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7774893.html

Delivery from Mariupol
August 2, 0:14

Image

Fitting from the DNR.
Gift epaulettes for Colonel-General of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
The gift did not reach the addressee, as the presenters of the gift did not survive the extraction from Mariupol.
Therefore, the present reached Sevastopol.

PS. Heavy.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7774374.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:12 pm

A form of psychological warfare
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/03/2022 ⋅ LEAVE A COMMENT

Image

The psychological war, like the media battle, is part of the war. This has been confirmed in the recent interview granted to a British media outlet by one of the Ukrainian military intelligence generals, who took advantage of the occasion to launch a whole series of topics into the news arena that, without a doubt, were going to cause a reaction in Russia - the American HIMARS, the weight of the West in the war and an alleged weakness of Russian intelligence. A form of provocation that does not require any proof, since the objective is simply to place in the Western press a certain discourse of Ukraine's superiority, even if it does not correspond to reality.

Original Article: Dmitry Steshin / Komsomolskaya Pravda

The major-general of the Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Vadim Skibitsky, has suddenly come clean with an interview in the English medium The Telegraph . Skibitsky should not be thought of as a quack or a charlatan. On the contrary. He is a high-ranking intelligence officer who has highlighted facts about the West's direct involvement in the battle in Ukraine. So that? It seems that Kiev doesn't want his partners to run away or leave him stranded. As you know, cats and Anglo-Saxons do that like no one else in the world. So General Skibitsky has spoken. And his words are full of malice.

Spy satellites. According to the general, "the detection and destruction of military aid arriving in Ukraine from Western countries is the number one goal of Russian agents." According to Vadim Skibitsky, it is impossible to fight the Russian infiltrators without the help of London and the other partners. When it comes to military intelligence, the UK and the US have provided almost everything from information to equipment. "We receive all kinds of information in real time to the minute," said the general proudly, praising the information received from Western satellites. “We have very good satellite images.” That is, the American and British spy satellites that pass over Ukraine have become, according to Skibitsky, part of the weapons supplied by the West to kyiv.

Poland also plays. The general calmly revealed a military secret, stating that "a significant part of the lethal aid arriving in Ukraine is initially delivered at the Rzeszow-Jasenka airfield in Poland, not far from the border." The general may hope that Russia will not hold its nerve and calibrate the Polish airfield. Then Poland could enter the war and then NATO. To attract Poland, the general continued with more military secrets: “Cooperation with Poland is also very high, almost 90% of military aid comes from there. We have joint operations with our partners.”

Who runs the HIMARS? The journalist asked the general how they managed to accurately hit Russian ammunition depots in the combat zone. In this case, Skibitsky made a clever move. On the one hand, he asserted that the West is involved in specifying Ukraine's targets for HIMARS and other high-precision Western-supplied systems. But he quickly found out. “US officials don't provide direct information about targets, they don't directly participate in the war. There may be consultations between the intelligence representatives of both countries before launching the missiles, which would allow Washington to stop any potential attack if they were not satisfied with the selected target.

One moment. But that means that all HIMARS attacks against civilian infrastructure in Donbass cities, including Elenovka prison, where Ukrainian nationalists from Azov are being held, have had to be approved by the United States. At the very least, they could block those attacks. And they haven't, even though they knew exactly where the missiles were going to hit.

Intelligence friendship. Fully aware that his interview was going to be carefully scrutinized in Russia, Skibitsky decided to provoke our counterintelligence agents. Nothing undermines the enemy's defenses like a high-level "witch hunt." According to the general, Russia, as well as all levels of the Government and the State Security Corps and Forces, is full of Ukrainian agents. However, he could not give a single example of how the Ukrainian intelligence network has obtained such information. What is important in his interview is something else: "Ukrainian spy network in Russia is definitely in high demand in the United States and the United Kingdom." That is the answer to the question of who is fighting in Ukraine against Russia. And also why Washington and London are prolonging this "war to the last Ukrainian."

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/08/03/una-f ... more-25197

Google Translator

*********************

Ukraine - Mines, Missiles, Warcrimes And A Warning To Zelenski

Russia continues its special military operation in Ukraine in a relatively slow manner.

Its military is tasked with the 'demilitarization' and 'denazification' of Ukraine. This task does not require large movements of the front line as the Ukrainian government continues to send fresh troops and nazis units towards the Russian lines. There the Russians reliably maul them without taking significant casualties on their own side.

---
The Ukrainian government and its military continue to commit war crimes.

Since a few days the Ukraine is firing missiles with thousands of anti-personal mines into Donetsk city and other population centers in the east. These are not powerful enough to kill but are designed to maim anyone who steps on them or tries to pick them up.

Image

Their color is green and brown so one will hardly see them when they are laying in grass or on rough ground. The Russian's once had similar mines but those deactivated themselves after 24 hours. The Ukrainian ones do not do that. They will still be dangerous months from now. Russia has send hundreds of troops to help with the demining.
---
On July 29 two HIMARS missiles were fired onto a prison camp in Olenivka (also written Elenovka), some 30 kilometers south of Donetsk city. They hit the barracks that housed Azov nazi fighters who had been caught in Mariupol. Fifty of those died and some 70 were wounded in the missile attack. Ukraine denied that it had launched the missiles and accused the Russians of willfully killing the prisoners.

However Russia does not need to fire missiles or bomb barracks to kill prisoners it already holds. It can simply take them out of of their barracks and hang or shoot them. It also would not wound 70 people it now must additionally care for.

Via Politico U.S. officials are covering for the Ukraine:

American-made rocket launchers not used in Ukraine prison strike, U.S. assesses

The U.S. has assessed that Ukraine did not attack a prison in a Russian-occupied eastern region of Donetsk with American-made rocket launchers last week, directly contradicting Russian claims, according to two U.S. officials.
...
However, no traces of the U.S.-provided weapons were found at the site, according to two U.S. officials with knowledge of the assessment, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic.
“We know Ukraine didn’t attack the site with HIMARS because the site doesn’t have the indications it would have if it was hit with HIMARS,” one of the officials said.

While one of the officials stopped short of saying Ukraine was not responsible for the strike, the other official said the evidence showed the attack was not conducted by Kyiv. Satellite photos of the site released by Maxar Technologies on July 30 appear to show damage only to the section of the detention center housing Ukrainian prisoners, with no collateral damage to surrounding buildings.


The warheads of the shorter range HIMARS missiles have 91 kilogram (200 pound) warheads. That is a relative little amount of explosives. HIMARS hits are precise and do not create wide ranging collateral damage. That is there whole point.

The claim that 'no traces of the U.S.-provided weapons were found at the site' is also definitely false. Several TV teams have visited the side and filmed the collected debris on the same day the incident had happened during the early morning hours. The diameter of these rocket motor parts fits to HIMARS missiles. Other filmed debris showed typical fragments of the HIMARS missile war head.

Image

It was the Ukraine, and especially its dubious leaders, who had an interest in killing the Azov prisoners. These had started to talk with Russian interviewers and were revealing war crimes for which the leadership in Ukraine is directly responsible.

On July 28 the Russians published a video of an interview with Azov nazi soldier Dmytro Kozatsky, call sign Orest, who directly accused Zelenski advisor Arestovich of ordering the killing of Russian soldiers who had been taken prisoners.

Kozatsky was running the public relation side for his Azov unit. Even before the war started, Kozatsky says, Arestovich was preparing an information campaign with shock videos that were supposed to show the torture and killing of Russian soldiers taken prisoners. Kozatsky received such an order and passed it on. He later noted that such shock videos were indeed made and published on social media sides.

Image

That witness statement is enough to put Arestovich into jail for a very long time. He responded by sending HIMARS missiles to kill the prisoners which were taking to the Russians and accusing him.

Publishing videos of the torturing and killing of Russian prisoners was supposed to deter Russian soldiers from further fighting in the war. This tactic was also used in the 1940s by the Ukrainian nazi collaborators of the OUN. It had the opposite effect of what it was supposed to do. The Russian were enraged about those films and photographs and fought even harder.

Today the Russian defense ministry accused Washington of being behind the missile attacks:

Russian Defence Ministry has recorded and is taking into account for the future an official admission by General Skibitsky, deputy head of the Chief Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine, that Washington directly coordinates each target for Kiev before strikes from US-made HIMARS MLRS.
Speaking to The Telegraph's British journalists, Skibitsky admitted that "before rocket launches, there are consultations between intelligence officials from both countries, which allow Washington to stop any potential attacks if they were unhappy with the intended target".

All this undeniably proves that Washington, contrary to White House and Pentagon claims, is directly involved in the conflict in Ukraine.

It is Biden administration that is directly responsible for all Kiev-approved rocket attacks on residential areas and civilian infrastructure in populated areas of Donbas and other regions, which have resulted in mass deaths of civilians.

No one else in Ukraine or in the world should have any doubts that the strikes by HIMARS rockets on Novaya Kakhovka on July 12, on Stakhanov on July 17, on Krasniy Luch on July 24, dozens of strikes on Donetsk and, of course, the July 29 strike on the detention facility in Elenovka, which killed 50 and injured 73 Ukrainian POWs, were planned by Zelensky regime and approved by Washington.

Political, criminal and moral responsibility for the Elenovka massacre and other war crimes in Ukraine, along with Zelensky, lies directly with Biden administration.


The relevant Telegraph piece was published yesterday:

Britain helps Ukraine hunt for Russian spies eyeing Western military aid

Asked how the US-provided Himars multiple-launch rocket systems have so precisely targeted Russian fuel and ammunition depots, as well as battlefield headquarters in eastern Ukraine, Gen Skibitsky said “in this case in particular, we use real-time information”.
US officials are not providing direct targeting information, which would potentially undermine their case for not being direct participants in the war, Gen Skibitsky said.

However, he suggested there was a level of consultation between intelligence officials of both countries prior to launching missiles that would allow Washington to stop any potential attacks if they were unhappy with the intended target.


---
Someone in the Biden administration told New York Time columnist Thomas Friedman to fire a warning shot against the Ukrainian president Zelenski.

He does so today in a column that warns about Pelosi's trip to Taiwan.

Why Pelosi’s Visit to Taiwan Is Utterly Reckless

Dear reader: The Ukraine war is not over. And privately, U.S. officials are a lot more concerned about Ukraine’s leadership than they are letting on. There is deep mistrust between the White House and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky — considerably more than has been reported.
And there is funny business going on in Kyiv. On July 17, Zelensky fired his country’s prosecutor general and the leader of its domestic intelligence agency — the most significant shake-up in his government since the Russian invasion in February. It would be the equivalent of Biden firing Merrick Garland and Bill Burns on the same day. But I have still not seen any reporting that convincingly explains what that was all about. It is as if we don’t want to look too closely under the hood in Kyiv for fear of what corruption or antics we might see, when we have invested so much there. (More on the dangers of that another day.)
...
In short, this Ukraine war is SO not over, SO not stable, SO not without dangerous surprises that can pop out on any given day. Yet in the middle of all of this we are going to risk a conflict with China over Taiwan, provoked by an arbitrary and frivolous visit by the speaker of the House?

It is Geopolitics 101 that you don’t court a two-front war with the other two superpowers at the same time.


As long as the U.S. keeps financing Zelenski he will continue to rule as he sees fit while also growing his already considerable nest egg.

Posted by b on August 2, 2022 at 14:53 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/08/u ... .html#more

********************

"Sands. Meat Grinder"
August 2, 21:54

Image

The realities of the battles for the village of Sands. View from the Ukrainian side of

Sands. Meat grinder.

What to lose, what else can be taken from me on the sixth day of my personal hell, in Pisky, a kilometer from the first street of Ukrainian Donetsk? The bodies of those who were dearer to me than relatives are lying under the heat in trenches cut with 152 caliber. As I wrote earlier, 6500 shells per fucking village in less than a day.

There have been six days of such attacks, and it doesn’t fit in my head how at least some of our infantry remains alive in this flurry of fire.

No, I don't whine.

Two mortars 82 and 120 are working from our side.

Sometimes he wakes up and “sneezes” two artillery barrels towards Donetsk.

We hardly answer. There is no counter-battery fire, from the word at all, the enemy, without any problems for himself, puts an artillery shell in our trenches, dismantles very strong, concrete positions in tens of minutes, pushing through our defense line without a pause and minimal rest.

The day before yesterday, it broke down, and two hundredths / three hundredths poured in. I do not publish any statistics, it is prohibited in our country, but you can’t even imagine the number and percentage of losses.

This is an Ibana meat grinder, where the battalion simply holds back the invasion with their bodies.

For almost a week we have been waiting for at least some help that would hit enemy artillery, we, I repeat, are being burned with impunity with everything that the Russian military system is rich in, aviation was working today.

I am proud of the leadership of the battalion, which remains here with us. The battalion commander is with us, everyone is with us, shell-shocked, light three hundredth, having bandaged, they return to their positions in a couple of hours, if you can call these bottomless funnels that way.

There is a war going on.

But without a counter-battery fight, it turns into a senseless meat grinder, where a frantic amount of our infantry is ground in a day.

Are you sure you want the truth? Here it is, the naked truth.

The reserve goes to the position, close the breakthrough with itself, and after five minutes out of 15 people only one remains intact.

The bodies are lying. If it's a light 300, maybe you'll be lucky, you'll stumble, and you'll go out on foot, you'll get there.

They took only 300. He shouted all the way: - Where is the support? Where is the artillery? Why were we abandoned? Why didn't anyone cover us?

I don’t know, my friend, why no one covered us ... he screams, And I’m ashamed that I’m still safe and sound, only a couple of times I got pretty deaf.

Vomited, pissed off, sorry, and back in the ranks.

All reserves will disperse, military equipment is on fire, the enemy approaches and takes our positions without any problems after another barrage of artillery.

Right now we are losing the Sands, all our human and material possibilities are almost exhausted.

Denis, a resident of Mariupol, who told me, "Well, I believe Arestovich, we will return everything back very soon" is dead. He was wounded twice, they bandaged him right in the trench, they told him, Denchik, go to the evacuation, but he answered, "Guys, I won't leave you."

And he was wounded for the first time, and after the second wound he continued to shoot back.

We haven't recovered his body yet. On the ruins of the Sands, he lies with his arms outstretched, and his gaze is fixed. He asks for revenge. How can I refuse his latest request? How can we all leave Dan?

I believe that Dimka survived after all. Because he couldn't die, having recently returned from the hospital, just proposed to his girlfriend. They say that after one of the parishes, he simply disappeared. Covered with earth. But, I believe that this is a mistake and he is alive. Foolish hope and hope.

I know my state doesn't like thinking out loud. But, I was not left with a choice among victory rage and arrest. The truth should sound, not whispered conversations in the kitchen. Of course, for this message will fly separately, because how; So, is the state really lying to its own citizens?

I won’t be surprised if someone says today: “Kremlin agent Sirozha blabbed about the ingenious plan of the winner on the Donetsk front, we’ll hang him on Myrotvorets.”

I've been trying to say that everything is under control. Now in the sands everything is not fucking under control, but for some reason the situation is hushed up.

Ring the broken bells while we cover the Sands with bodies

. were the smallest for the entire period of the special operation.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7776073.html

Google Translator

***********************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

***

Сolonelcassad
Special operation in Ukraine. The situation on August 2 according to RIA Novosti .



- The recognition of the deputy head of military intelligence of Ukraine Skibitsky about direct coordination with Washington of each HIMARS target proves the direct involvement of the United States in the conflict, the Russian Defense Ministry said Kiev regime and approved by Washington, said the Russian Ministry of Defense

- Russian Aerospace Forces destroyed more than 50 nationalists of the 2nd Battalion of the 54th Mechanized Brigade of Ukrainian troops near Marinka in the DPR in a day - Russian Aerospace Forces

hit up to 250 mercenaries of the "foreign legion" in the Ukrainian city ​​of Nikolaev

— The Russian Aerospace Forces liquidated up to 500 Ukrainian nationalists from the 92nd mechanized brigade and a large number of military equipment with high-precision weapons

— The Russian Ministry of Defense reported that a battalion of Ukrainian motorized infantry was shot while retreating by its own gunners

— The Russian military hit two batteries of “Hyacinth” howitzers and suppressed four platoon of the Grad MLRS of the Ukrainian military —

Russian aviation and artillery forces delivered strikes on enemy manpower in 142 districts, 7 ammunition depots and 5 command posts in a day

Ukrainian troops in the Artemovsk area, the Russian Defense Ministry said

- Ukrainian nationalist formations equipped a stronghold in the buildings of the technical school of the agricultural university in Slavyansk on the territory of the DPR controlled by Kiev, without notifying the local population, the Russian Defense Ministry said

- According to the Turkish Ministry of Defense, the first cargo ship with Ukrainian grain arrived in Istanbul

- the Russian Foreign Ministry expressed hope that that the relevant UN structures and ICRC experts will not shy away from inviting Russia to take part in the study of what happened in Yelenovka

***

Forwarded from
Voenkor Kotenok Z
Military expert Boris Rozhin about changes per day on 23.45 Moscow time on 08/02/2022 during a special military operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine specifically for the Voenkor Kotenok Z @voenkorKotenok channel :
1.
Sands.
Due to the massive artillery offensive and the competent actions of the assault infantry, we managed to enter the village and start fighting already inside the village. The enemy suffered heavy losses in manpower and equipment, and also lost a number of important strongholds. The loss of Sand will seriously complicate the position of the Armed Forces of Ukraine south of Avdiivka.
2.
Avdiivka.
Positional battles to the north of the village and in the industrial zone. There hasn't been any major progress yet.
3.
Artemovsk.
The troops are advancing towards Kodem, and the capture of Maisky is also reported.
Fighting on the outskirts of Artemovsk. An attempt to counterattack the Armed Forces of Ukraine on Pokrovskoye ended in heavy losses of the enemy and retreat to their original positions.
Fights in the area of ​​Vesela Dolina and Peak.
4.
Soledar.
Fighting on the outskirts of the city, as well as in the area of ​​Yakovlevka and Belogorovka. In the area of ​​Seversk without significant changes, here the enemy was able to stabilize the front.
5.
Kharkov.
A slight advance of the RF Armed Forces in the area of ​​Dementyevka and Bayrak is reported, but this does not change the general positional nature of the fighting.
The results of the strikes on Kharkov and Chuguev brought a rich harvest to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
6.
Nikolaev.
Against the backdrop of ongoing attacks by the RF Armed Forces on Nikolaev, the Armed Forces of Ukraine continued to shell Kherson.
In the Krivoy Rog direction - fighting on the Ingulets River. The enemy there suffered heavy losses among the reservists and the Volkssturm, who are used as cannon fodder to probe the first line of defense of the RF Armed Forces. On the Nikopol direction - no changes.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*********************

Image

The EU begins the start to retreat
Originally published: Al Mayadeen on August 1, 2022 by Alastair Crooke (more by Al Mayadeen) | (Posted Aug 02, 2022)

The EU has begun its retreat: It has taken the first steps in unraveling energy and food sanctions on Russia. Will other steps follow? Or will the pan-West, Russia-phobic axis strike back with further belligerence? Nothing is settled yet, but were the retreat to continue, and the separate Ukraine grain export accord hold together, it will be generally good news for the Region.

The bigger issue is of whether–even a more substantive EU retreat ensues–this will make a difference to the larger economic paradigm. Unfortunately, the answer is very probably not.

The EU’s seventh package of sanctions on Russia, whilst ostensibly posing as an increase in sanctions (which it is for certain gold imports into the EU that have no real impact on Russia)–and with a small extension of the list of controlled (mainly tech) items–the package represents, in reality, a concealed retreat.

For, as one digs deeper, the package substantially alleviates sanctions in key areas. Firstly, the package ‘clarifies’ aviation measures (Comment: Though opaquely worded, this passage seems to be quietly permitting the export of spare Airbus parts to Russian aviation fleets). The package says that to avoid any negative consequences for food and energy security around the world–and for clarity – the EU extends the exemption to transport of agricultural products, (food) and fertiliser exports and the transport of oil from Russia to third countries. Furthermore, it exempts third party purchases of pharmaceutical and medical products from Russia.

The EU likes to claim that their sanctions never included food and fertilisers, and that the suggestion that they did, is propaganda. Their argument, however, is disingenuous. The EU sanctions’ legalistic wording was so open, so opaque, that it was not clear whether they did, or didn’t. Trading companies understandably feared retroactive fines for breaking sanctions. They had the bitter experience of the U.S. Treasury refusing to say explicitly what was allowed, and which not; and in the case of Iran, out of the blue, hitting European banks with monstrous fines.

The explicitness matters: Food, agricultural products and fertiliser transported to Third Countries are exempt from sanctions. States like Egypt can now import wheat from Ukraine, Russia–and effectively from Belarus too, (since it now forms a single market with Russia).

Equally, the third country transport of Russian oil to states such as China, India, Iran, and Saudi Arabia are now explicitly exempt.

Here is another disingenuity–if not hypocrisy-implicit within this exemption. The EU, all along, has been virtue signalling how they would ban Russian energy sales to the EU–and how that the resulting loss of revenue to Russia, would starve, and cripple Moscow’s war effort in Ukraine.

Well, first Russia insisted on payment for its gas in roubles. The EU said ‘no’, but then relented. Then the EU targeted Russian oil, and the G7 touted a ‘cap’ on oil prices. But states such as China and India said ‘no’. And now, the EU has relented on the transport of Russian oil by Third Parties. (Greek and Cypriot tanker owners had already arm-twisted their governments into insisting on an earlier exemption, for them).

What is going on? The oil market has been volatile recently, as the U.S. has tried to manipulate the ‘paper market’ (which is way larger than the physical market), in order to contrive a dip in prices in the Bent and WTI index. Again, the object has been to hurt Russia–and to facilitate Yellen’s ‘oil cap’ by getting prices closer to the $60 a barrel on which Yellen has set her capping hopes.

It hasn’t worked, and it seems the White House just wants oil prices down–full stop. Even the hawk, Victoria Nuland, said Friday that the U.S. and its allies need Russian oil supplies to enter world markets, otherwise the cost of this resource will start to rise again:

We need to see the presence of Russian oil on the world market, otherwise the shortage of oil will lead to a new rise in prices.

Realism seeps in! Putin achieves all his key demands in respect to the food crisis–and today, is even selling a slightly increased volume of oil.

The price of oil will indeed fluctuate. It will respond however, more to the effects arising from depth reached in the coming recession, than on market manipulation, and Yellen’s price capping efforts. The western Establishment is still trying to get its head around the new reality that commodities are seen to have innate value, whereas fiat currencies such as the dollar don’t. The new commodity era represents a psychological global shift towards intrinsic value, at time of rising inflation.

And where will that ‘now exempted’ Russian oil transit, be headed? Why, to the EU (largely). This is where the disingenuity becomes evident: India buys Russian oil, runs it through its refineries, and sells ‘Indian refined products’ where? To the EU. Ditto for other cargos. Ditto for Saudi Arabia. Those vessels’ bills of lading won’t mention Russia as they arrive at their EU destination.

In short, the EU is quietly facilitating the bypass of its own proclaimed ‘crushing’ sanctions regime.

Might this this small step of retreat however, tip the wind out from the swelling sail of economic crisis? No. There are two major sources of inflation. There’s the supply side and the demand side. Either one of them can drive inflation, but they’re very, very different in terms of how they work.

The supply side, as the name implies, comes from input. The supply just isn’t there. Farm prices are going up because fertilizer prices are going up, partly because of the war in Ukraine. Oil prices are going up because there’s a global shortage, and there’s disruption in supply chains.

So what can the ECB do about that? Nothing. Does the ECB drill for oil? Does the ECB run a farm? Does the ECB drive a truck? Does the ECB pilot a cargo vessel across the Pacific or load freight at the Port of Los Angeles?

No, the Central Bankers do none of those things, and so they can’t fix that part of the problem. Raising interest rates has no impact on the supply side shortages we’re seeing. And that’s the direction from which inflation–that is driving European recession–is blowing.

https://mronline.org/2022/08/02/the-eu- ... o-retreat/

***********************

Ukraine SitRep - On The Ground Report - Ukrainian Frontline Collapses

Below is a slightly edited machine translation of a piece which appeared yesterday on the Ukrainian side censor.net. The piece was promoted by Yuri Butusov, a well known Ukrainian military correspondent. It is originally a social media post by someone who was on the frontline in Pisky, immediately northwest of Donetsk city.

Context:

Over the last two to three months the Ukrainian side has used its positions in the vicinity of Donetsk city to more or less randomly shell the civilian population on the Russian affiliated side. After some serious protests the Russian military command agreed to launch a dedicated counter-artillery operation to shut down the deadly Ukrainian harassment.

Its daily 'clobber reports', here is yesterday's, have since included lines like these on nearly each and every day:

As part of counter-battery warfare 2 artillery batteries of Giatsint howitzers near Dzerzhinsk and Novhorodskoye, Donetsk People's Republic have been hit.
4 platoons of Grad MLRS and 9 artillery platoons at firing positions near Seversk, Kirovo, Artemovsk, Avdeevka, Peski, Orlovka, Shakhterskoye, Velikaya Novoselka in Donetsk People's Republic, Dobropolie in Zaporozhye Region, Shirokoye, Bereznevatoye in Nikolaev Region, Russkaya Lozovaya and Nortsovka in Kharkov Region.


The systematic counter-artillery campaign has seriously deteriorated the already rare Ukrainian fire power.

The Russian side has also changed the primary direction of its thrust from the northern front of the Sievierdonetsk-Lysichansk-Siversk direction to a push further south. The current offensive operation is concentrated north-west and west of Donetsk city in the direction of Avdivka. There is an envelope operation going on north and south to surround that extremely heavily fortified town.

The red territory to the left of the red line marks parts of recent progress.

Image
Source: Live UA map

Pisky is the southern part of that envelope operation.

Image

Following intense artillery preparations Russian forces are currently - slowly, slowly - clearing the lines of reinforced concrete bunkers and ditches that have been build on the Ukrainian side over the last 8 years. Here now is the view of that battle from the Ukrainian side (edited machine translation, for an alternative translation see this.) (Note: 300 is the military cargo designator for wounded people, 200 is for dead soldiers):

Pisky. Meat grinder

Author: Serhiy Gnezdilov
What is there to lose, what else can be taken from me on the sixth day of my personal hell, in Pisky, a kilometer from the first street of Donetsk, Ukraine? The bodies of those who were dearer to me than my family are lying under the heat in the trenches, broken by 152 caliber. As I wrote earlier, 6,500 shells per damn village in less than a day.

It's been six such days already, and I can't imagine how even a small number of our infantry survived in this barrage of enemy fire.

No, I'm not whining.

Two mortars 82 and 120 are working on our side.

Sometimes they wake up and "sneeze" two artillery barrels in the direction of Donetsk.

We hardly respond. There is no counter-battery fire, from the word go, the enemy puts artillery shells in our trenches without any problems, dismantles very strong, concrete positions in tens of minutes, pushing our defense line without pause or minimal rest.

The day before yesterday, the line broke, and a river of 200 or 300 [killed/wounded] was poured. I will not publish any statistics, it is forbidden in our country, but you have no idea the number and percentage of losses.

This is a hell of a meat grinder, where the battalion simply holds back the onslaught with their bodies.

For almost a week, we have been waiting for at least some kind of help that would hit the enemy's artillery, we, I repeat, are being fired with impunity with everything that the Russian military system is rich in, their aviation was working today.

I am proud of the leadership of the battalion that remained here with us. The combatant is with us, everyone is with us, contused, light 300, bandaged and returned after a couple of hours to the position, if you can call these bottomless ravines that way.

There is a war going on.

But without a counter-battery fight, it turns into a senseless meat grinder, where an insane amount of our infantry is ground up in a day.

Did you really want the truth? Here it is, the naked truth.

The reserve goes to the position, closes the breakthrough, and after five minutes, only one of the 15 people remains intact.

The bodies lie on the ground. If it's a light 300, maybe you'll be lucky, you'll faint, and you'll get out on foot, you'll reach the medics.

They just took a three hundredth [one wounded]. He shouted all the way: - "Where is the support? Where is the artillery? Why were we abandoned? Why didn't anyone cover us?"

I don't know, my friend, why no one covered us... He screams, and I'm ashamed that I'm still safe and sound, only a couple of good deafening.

I threw up, I pissed myself, I'm sorry, and I'm back in action.

All reserves are destroyed, military equipment is on fire, the enemy approaches and without any problems occupies our positions after another barrage of artillery.

Right now we are losing Pisky, all our human and material resources are almost exhausted.

Denys, a resident of Mariupol, who told me "well, I trust the arrestee [Zelenski advisor Arestovich], we will return everything back very soon" is dead. He was wounded twice, they bandaged him right in the trench, they told him, Denchyk, go to the evacuation, but he answered "guys, I will not abandon you."

Both wounded for the first time, and after the second wounding, he continued to shoot back.

We still haven't taken his body. On the ruins of Pisky, he lies with his arms outstretched and his gaze frozen. He asks for revenge. How can I refuse his latest request? How can we all leave Dan?

I believe that Dimka survived after all. Because he could not die, having recently returned from the hospital, having just proposed to his girlfriend. They say that after one of the parishes he simply disappeared. It fell asleep with earth. But, I believe that this is a mistake, and he is alive. Foolish hope and expectation.

I know, my country does not like to think aloud. But, I was left with no choice between victory and arrest. The truth should be heard, not whispers in the kitchen. Of course, he will fly separately for this post, because how? Yes, does the state lie to its own citizens?

I won't be surprised if someone says today: "Kremlin agent Sirozh talked about the brilliant plan of the victors on the Donetsk front, let's hang him on the Peacemaker."

I amused to say that everything is under control. Now in Pisky, everything is not under anyone's control, but for some reason the situation is being hushed up.

Ring broken bells while we cover Pisky with bodies.

We need artillery.

Give us something here to hold on to.


Now put yourself into the position of Serhiy Gnezdilov, Denys or Dimka. Then think about the politicians who sweet talk of heroic Ukrainian resistance and send these men to be slaughtered for no possible gain.

Sorry Serhiy, more artillery wont do it. The Russian side would just grind it up within days. How many of the 120 U.S. M-777 howitzers that were given to Ukraine still exist? Maybe 10 or so, most of them damaged?

There are other operations going on. North of the Donetsk front there is a thrust towards Bakhmut (also known as Artomovsk). Yesterday Soledar, north of Bakhmut was reported to be mostly captured. Vershyna and Zaiseve, south of it, are also gone or will fall soon.

Image

The Ukrainian side has loudly announce an upcoming counter offensive on the southern front towards Kherson city. But the number of Russian units in that larger area have since been increased to a level that makes a new Russian offensive towards Mykolaiv (Nikolaev), Kryvyv Rih (Krivoy Rog) or Zaporitzhia more likely than anything the Ukrainian side could possibly do.

Image

The Russian side also wages a continuous campaign against Ukrainian reserves, brigade headquarters and military installations or temporary storage sides far behind the immediate front line. These less visible attacks kill huge numbers of Ukrainian troops. From yesterday's 'clobber report' (also here):

As a result of Russian Aerospace Forces strike on combat positions of 54th Mechanized Brigade of AFU near Mar'inka in Donetsk People's Republic, more than 50 nationalists of 2nd Battalion of this unit have been destroyed.
High-precision weapons of the Russian Aerospace Forces struck on a temporary deployment point of the Ukrainian Foreign Legion near Nikolaev city. The attacks have resulted in the elimination of up to 250 nationalists and 20 units of military equipment.

High-precision strikes of the Russian Aerospace Forces have eliminated up to 500 nationalists of 92nd Mechanised Brigade of AFU and large amount of military equipment in Merefa and Chuguyiv in Kharkov Region.

Shelling of combat positions of 16th Battalion of 58th AFU Motorized Infantry Brigade near Artemovsk have resulted in the elimination of over 130 nationalists. The remaining battalion servicemen, numbering up to 70, hurriedly left their positions and departed for Konotop, Sumy Region, where they were disarmed and declared deserters.

21st Battalion of 56th Motorized Infantry Brigade, which had suffered significant losses near Peski, came under artillery fire of AFU during its retreat to Vodyanoye and was almost completely eliminated.


Notice the last paragraph. The unit in Pisky (Peski), where Serhiy Gnezdilov reported from, was retreating towards Vodiane (Vodyanoye), north of Pisky (see the second map above). On their way the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) opened fire on them, killing nearly everyone who had survived the Russian attacks against Pisky.

Was this punishment for the already late retreat? Or was it a misidentification by a forward artillery observer who thought that those retreating Ukrainian forces were attacking Russian units? I don't know, but ...

By the way - the opponent casualties numbers given by the Russian ministry of defense are likely over estimated (as all such numbers are). But even if only half of those ~900 claimed yesterday really were wounded or killed on the day before the losses are still devastating. In 1967, at the very hight of the Vietnam war, U.S. casualties, dead and wounded, were at maximum about 200 per day. We see a multiple of those on the Ukrainian side each and every day.

This is not sustainable. The Ukrainian government should have given up the uneven fight months ago. It is an immense crime to further urge it on.

Posted by b on August 3, 2022 at 8:07 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/08/u ... .html#more
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:27 pm

Eternal war for profits

POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/04/2022
Original Article: Alexey Zotiev

Image

In the past, I had always believed that science is the engine of progress. But having lived much of my life in relatively turbulent times and having witnessed a series of military conflicts, I have come to realize that war is an engine of progress. Of course, there is a but. As a rule, the war was a significant boost to the development of industry and the national economy not of all the participants in the military conflict, but of those who provoked the conflict and managed to stay away.

Today's Ukraine has nothing to gain from a military conflict with Russia. The rapid, or dare I say catastrophic, drop in population, the destruction of civil, military and industrial infrastructure, the loss of territory and the collapse of the national economy is probably what awaits this country as a result of the adventure started [in 2014] by kyiv. It is difficult to imagine what can be done so that an open conflict with a stronger neighbor will give a second life to the economy of this State. It is clear that in order for there to be progress, it would be much more correct for Ukrainian society to opt for science.

In the case of the European Union, which actively supports Ukraine's desire for independence and a democratic future , the situation is somewhat different. Yes, the population of the European Union is in decline in terms of living standards and some companies with a long history go bankrupt easily. But there are also those who, despite the significant increase in the cost of energy and the restrictions of the markets, manage to make enormous profits based on trading goods that are not in particular demand in times of peace.

It has become known that the German government has approved the sale to Ukraine of a large batch of Panzerhaubitze 2000 self-propelled howitzers, produced by the private German company Krauss-Maffei Wegmann. The information about the transaction has been confirmed by a representative of the company. As he explained, the company delivered all the documents to the German government on July 11 and received approval two days later. Of course, we are not talking about disinterested help to sister Ukraine, "victim of Russian aggression". The contract provides for the production of one hundred howitzers and will cost Ukraine 1.7 billion euros.

Panzerhaubitze 2000 self-propelled artillery systems were developed in 1998 and are equipped with 155mm shells. The range is 30-40 kilometers. The PzH 2000 can fire up to ten shells per minute and is considered one of the most modern howitzers in the world. Of course, this equipment is not available right now and it will take some time to produce and deliver it to Ukraine, but that is not a problem for anyone, since the order from this large company of the German military-industrial complex will provide long-term work and guarantee good benefits to shareholders.

The deal approved by the German government explains the essence of the military conflict in which Ukraine and the West as a collective have pushed the Russian Federation. Defense companies must work and produce new weapons and the old and ineffective ones will quickly go to Ukraine, where they will turn into scrap heaps as quickly as possible, thus securing new orders from the European and American military-industrial complex. An eternal cycle of benefits will settle in the pockets of all those, including politicians, who decide that “the battle for the future of democratic Ukraine” must be continued.

Something similar is also perceived in the United States, not only in the European Union. Outdated weapons and ammunition that have been in depots for decades are sent directly to the front lines. The need to create new reserves is evident, since the treacherous Russia does not sleep and plans to enslave the entire planet. The military-industrial complex is working at full capacity and its shareholders multiply their capital, openly ignoring that their money is already stained with blood. Moreover, it is not only stained with the blood of the civilians of Donbass, for whom the humanist West does not care at all, but also with the blood of the people of Ukraine, who consider the Europeans and Americans their loyal allies.

Although it speaks of seeking an end to the military conflict and imposes a whole series of endless sanctions on Russia supposedly to force Moscow to seek peace, the West at the same time shows the utmost interest in prolonging the confrontation, which brings good benefits to industrialists and politicians. In the context of long-term contracts for the supply of weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, any appeal to transfer the conflict to a diplomatic phase sounds like farce.

Although the blind faith of the Ukrainians in the West as a truly loyal ally of Ukraine seems even more ridiculous. In fact, everything is much simpler. The Ukrainians have been dying and will continue to die so that the West can get rid of outdated weapons and fill its stockpiles with modern weapons. And they will do it with the money of the Ukrainians. It is a pity that, in order to fill the European and American military-industrial complex with work, they not only die, but also kill people who had no intention of becoming part of this cynical circle.

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/08/04/guerr ... more-25204

Google Translator

***************

American mercenary Ben Valkro on war crimes in Ukraine
August 4, 11:20

Image

“We cut the tendons and made him swim to see how he would swim without the tendons. We were ordered not to take the enemy prisoner. The victim was from Central Russia. He was about 18 years old, ”American Ben Velcro spoke about the massacre of a Russian soldier near Kharkov

(Audio recording at link in English.)


Remember the American mercenary Benjamin Velcro ( https://t.me/rybar/35977 ), who dreamed of dismembering Russia and putting up a gay park on Red Square?

Ben took on his chest a couple of days ago and confessed to the brutal massacre of a Russian soldier. He also told us about what was happening in their unit.

The American is disappointed in the Ukrainian command because of their lack of "offensive spirit."

According to him, the commanders expose the fighters to artillery strikes, and foreign mercenaries do all the work, so he submitted his resignation.

A few hours later, Velcro got drunk and, already illegible, confused in his own testimony, told the following.

After the scandalous video of the castration of a Ukrainian soldier, the fighters of his unit tortured a Russian soldier.

According to Velcro, it was "an 18-year-old soldier from the Urals or Siberia." They cut the tendons on his legs and forced him to swim across the Seversky Donets River, after which they shot him. He refused to provide information about the victim.

Initially, the American said that the soldier was tortured and killed by mercenaries from the Georgian National Legion, but then he claimed that he also participated in the torture.

In a drunken head, Velcro contradicted himself, declaring that he was ready to die in battle. Therefore, there is no good reason to believe that he left the International Legion.

https://t.me/rybar/36631 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7778428.html

The turbine was found, but no one needs it
August 3, 7:54 p.m

Image

Gazprom looked and looked at the clowning performed by Germany and Canada, waited for the "discovery" of the Siemens turbine in Germany and its "examination" by Scholz, after which he announced that he would not take it away, since Siemens had violated contractual obligations because of the sanctions.
Thus, an increase in gas transportation through the Nord Stream can not be expected for the time being.
The government does not want to start pumping through Nord Stream 2, since this will be unambiguously interpreted as capitulation to Putin.
Nevertheless, the captains of German industry and their lobbyists in the Budestag continue to throw in the thesis that if Nord Stream 1 is not working due to sanctions, then Nord Stream 2 should be launched,

Bild reports that from August 2021 to August 2022, the average gas bill for an ordinary German family increased by 184%.
It was - 1300 euros per year. It became - 3500 euros per year.
At the same time, there is a steady trend towards further price increases, which the government offers citizens to solve by reducing gas consumption as much as possible.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7777873.html

The kawaun barge won't come again
August 3, 3:36 p.m

Image

Ukraine complains that Russian troops captured in the Kherson region the same "legendary" barge that transported "kavunas" (watermelons) from Kherson to Kyiv, which was presented as an achievement under Poroshenko, including in defiance of the construction of the Crimean bridge.
As a result, the bridge was built, there were no barges, no kavuns, no Kherson.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7777406.html

Corsa died.
August 3, 2:54 p.m

Image

Olga Kachura died near Gorlovka, who was known under the call sign "Korsa". For many years she was the permanent commander of the Grad MLRS division.
She fought in 2014. Since the beginning of the SVO, she was constantly at the front, working in various sectors.
In fact, Olga Kachura was the most famous female commander in the DPR army. Bereavement.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7777103.html

(Video at link)

Shelling of Donetsk. 04.08.2022
August 4, 12:58 p.m

Image

As a result of terrorist shelling of the center of Donetsk during the farewell ceremony for Olhor Kachura, at least 5 people were killed in the city, 6 were injured of moderate severity. The fire was fired from American howitzers M777. At the moment, the shelling of Donetsk continues. Nazi degenerates in Kyiv claim that "the Russian army and separatists are shelling Donetsk".

Фото и видео. Часть 18+

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59419
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59420
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59422
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59425
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59429
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59430
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59433
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59437
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59438
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59441
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59442
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59443
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59450
https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59452

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7778743.html

Google Translator

Do I need comment?

************************

Russian MoD Makes the US Liable for Ukrainian War Crimes

Image
Russian Defense Ministry spokesperson said that the U.S. is directly related to the war crimes committed in the middle of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Aug. 2, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@MajorGeneralIg1

Published 2 August 2022 (10 hours 18 minutes ago)

On Tuesday, the Russian Defense Ministry said that the war crimes committed during the armed conflict in Ukraine are the U.S. administration's responsibility.

According to the statement issued Tuesday, by the Russian Ministry of Defense, the U.S. is liable for all war crimes committed by Kiev's military since the beginning of the Russian special operation in Ukraine. The announcement came in light of the revelations made by the top Ukrainian spy, where he said that d that Kiev consults with Washington before using US-made HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems and that Washington actually has veto power over decision-making.

“All this irrefutably proves that Washington, contrary to the statements of the White House and the Pentagon, is directly involved in the conflict in Ukraine. It is the Biden administration that is directly responsible for all the Kiev-approved missile attacks on residential areas and civilian infrastructure in the settlements across Donbass and other regions that caused mass civilian casualties,” said Igor Konashenkov, Defense Ministry spokesman.

The Russian MoD said that Kiev's military has been using U.S.-supplied HIMARS systems to target installations without having a legitimate military target. The ministry said that proof of this is the recent attack performed on a penal colony in Elenovka in the Donetsk People's Republic. The facilities housed Ukrainian POWs. The report indicated that at least 50 prisoners died and another 73 were injured because of the attack.

"The Biden administration, together with Zelensky, bears political, criminal, and moral responsibility for the massacre in Elenovka and other war crimes in Ukraine," said the Russian spokesman. The interview with the Ukrainian senior intelligence official, Major General Vadim Skibitsky, confirmed that Kiev's troops were getting feedback from Washington and London before launching HIMARS rockets.


Last February 24, the Russian administration announced the start of a special military operation in Ukraine, which aimed to demilitarize and denazify the country. The Kremlin cited Kiev’s failure to implement the Minsk agreements, which were supposed to guarantee the regions of Donetsk and Lugansk special status within Ukraine.

In February as well, the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, signed the recognition of the Donbass republics as independent states, calling on the Ukrainian government to assume a neutral state, committing itself not to join any Western military bloc.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0015.html

********************

From Cassad's Telegram account:

***

Forwarded from
ADEQUATE Z
If the current breakout in several directions at once of the most powerful swine fortification area near Donetsk is completed successfully, that is, it takes place to the full depth, this will call into question the ability of the Ukrainian command to maintain an integral front line from the Kharkov suburbs to the Black Sea.

Donbass, which is essentially an almost continuous urban agglomeration, is immeasurably more convenient for defense than the steppe to the west of it, especially considering the defensive lines that have been improved there for eight years. And when the overwhelming fire superiority of ours, from which the Ukrainians squeal with a cut gilt, is crowned with a cut of the defense to this very bare steppe, the consequences are likely to be cascading.

A threat to the flanks, and soon the rear of the areas adjacent to the broken. The choice is between the prospect of encirclements that lead to the expansion of the hole in the front, a general retreat along this same steppe under continuous fire, or attempts to plug the hole with reserves, again in an open field. And the line of the Dnieper as the nearest frontier on which one can hope to restore the integrity of the front.

If to all this in the coming weeks we add a transition to the offensive with decisive goals in at least one more sector, for which we certainly have the strength and means, it will become many times more difficult to plug two operational holes instead of one.

***

Forwarded from
Unofficial Bezsonov "Z"
#exclusive
Why are Ukrainians such bastards once again confirm the records and correspondence that were in the mobile phone of one of the leaders of the Ukrainian Nazi sabotage and assault group “Bears”:

“...Nazism, as an option for saving the nation. As an example of love for the nation. As the rise of the nation above the imposed values. For the nation, killing everyone who is against the nation...”

Correspondence with “Mykola 128” (possibly the 128th mountain assault brigade, which was repeatedly marked by artillery shelling of the DPR) about the killings of civilians in Donbass:

“I don’t know what to do. Doubts plague.
- What doubts, friend? There is only "Rusnya". Those who profess the Russian faith and culture are not Ukrainians. Those who communicate in Russian are not Ukrainians. So they are all enemies, like their children. So don't worry and do your job. Like all of us..."

@NeoficialniyBeZsonoV

***

Сolonelcassad
❗️🇷🇺🇺🇦Offensive on Donbass: the situation in the east of Ukraine
by the end of August 3, 2022

▪️There are no significant changes in the front line in the Kharkov direction .
➖The RF Armed Forces are fighting with Ukrainian formations in the area of ​​Borshcheva , Vesele and Dementievka .
➖The Russian army struck at the military infrastructure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Kharkov itself .

▪️Allied forces are conducting offensive battles in the Bakhmut (Artemovsk) direction .
➖In Soledar , the RF Armed Forces are fighting for the KNAUF-GIPS plant and the Extra railway station .
➖From the side of Pokrovsky , an offensive is developing on Bakhmut (Artyomovsk) : the enemy is being forced out of the last defensive lines on the heights surrounding the city.
➖To the south, battles are going on on a wide front from Travnevoye to Veselaia Dolina .

▪️Units of the People's Militia of the DPR, with the support of Russian artillery and aviation, are advancing in the Donetsk direction .
➖The RF Armed Forces are fighting their way from the dam along the headquarters to the southwestern part of the village of Peski . To the south of the village, artillery destroyed strongholds of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the fields near Netaylovo and near the Donetsk ring road .
➖Fierce clashes continue in Maryinka, but the key slag heap of the Shchurovo mine still remains with the Ukrainian side.
➖In response, Ukrainian formations are carrying out terrorist shelling of residential areas of the Donetsk agglomeration, mining streets of cities with MLRS with “petal” mines.

▪️There are no significant changes on the front line in the Zaporozhye direction . There are positional battles south of Velikaya Novoselka .

▪️In the Krivoy Rog direction, the side is preparing for further offensive operations. Artillery duels continue on the line of contact.

Image

***

Forwarded from
Ukraine.ru
Two more Ukronazis liquidated

Company commander of the 4th battalion of the Right Sector DUK (an extremist organization banned in Russia) Andrei Zhovanik (call sign Tatar) and his henchman Yuri Kovalenko (call sign Sokar) were destroyed near Soledar. Both of them were part of the volunteer battalion "Carpathian Sich".

Zhovanik was a hardened Nazi - since 1989 he was a member of the Union of Ukrainian Youth, which advocated the education of youth in the spirit of the OUN and UPA. Later, he became one of the founders of the radical Ukronazi Svoboda party, and was also an active member of the pseudo-historical society Kholodny Yar, whose books educated fascism in Ukraine.

After the start of the war in the Donbass, he took part in the killings of civilians and the battles at Saur-mogila as part of the "Right Sector"

t.me/ua_tribunal

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

********************

Who Killed the POWs at Yelenovka? All Signs on the Ground Point to a Ukrainian Attack
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 2, 2022
Eva K Bartlett

Image

It was extremely difficult to witness the charred and twisted remains of Ukrainian POWs in the Yelenovka detention center at first hand. The stench of death was overwhelming. Bodies remained in the ruins and melted into the metal bunk beds they were on at the time of the bombing.

Other corpses, presumably killed by shrapnel instead of burning to death, lay outside. A soldier was inspecting them, presumably in order to determine the exact cause, and the victims’ identities. Even if the Ukrainian side killed its own soldiers, it was the Russians who took care to identify the remains.

I shared some of the gruesome photos and my thoughts on Twitter immediately after getting back from Yelenovka.

*Warning, graphic photos.

Horrific scenes today at the detention centre near the village of Yelenovka, which Ukraine bombed late last night with American HIMARS. Press Secretary of the DPR Military Command, Eduard Basurin, said 53 Ukrainian POWs dead, 71 injured… pic.twitter.com/y1RtamWayv

— Eva Karene Bartlett (@EvaKBartlett) July 29, 2022[/i]

The next morning, I went around Donetsk to document the extremely dangerous “petal” mines Ukraine has dropped on the city. According to DPR Emergency Services, eight civilians had been killed by these mines just the day before. If you step on one of these tiny-but powerful-explosives, chances it will merely tear off a leg instead of outright killing you. And they are insidiously toy-like in appearance, likely to attract children’s attention.



Who benefits from the war crime at Yelenovka?

Ukraine and Western media, as would be expected, blame Russia for the bombing of Yelenovka detention center, which killed 53 people. Russia and the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), in turn, point the finger at Kiev.

In addition to those killed, the 2am bombing, which DPR officials say was carried out using American-supplied HIMARS, injured at least eight employees and over 70 POWs held there. The prisoners were captured Ukrainian combatants, mainly members of the Azov neo-Nazi militia who’d surrendered in Mariupol in May.

Image


If HIMARS, or High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System, were indeed the source of the destruction and death, then it is almost certain it was Ukraine who bombed the prison, given that Kiev had the coordinates and is the only side in the conflict that possesses such weapons. Even the Pentagon admits it is possible, albeit characterizing the strike as “unintentional.”

From a logical perspective, Russia had no motivation to bomb the prison. For Ukraine, on the other hand, these POWs represented a liability, in that they could testify to the alleged war crimes they committed against Donbass civilians.

Ukraine has made a litany of claims meant to incriminate Russia throughout the current conflict –the Bucha massacre, the strike on the Mariupol maternity hospital, the Ghost of Kiev hoax, the supposed mass graves of civilians, the outlandish false allegations of Russian soldiers committing sexual crimes, which even saw the former Ukrainian Parliamentary Commissioner for Human Rights fired by Kiev’s own parliament.

Russia has invited the UN and the International Red Cross to investigate the Yelenovka prison bombing. Meanwhile, observers online have used the publicly available data to put together a picture of what occurred. Here’s an insightful analysis from the Rybar Telegram channel (with more than 627,000 followers), specializing in military analytics:

“The eastern part of the building suffered the most damage, where a powerful fire and explosion occurred, which blew out the windows.” Judging by the angle of impact, the analyst concludes that “the shooting was carried out from the trajectory of Marinka-Kurakhovo –the Sergeevka triangle– Pokrovsk-Udachnoe.” This is Ukrainian-controlled territory. The analysis could not conclude whether HIMARS was used, from the information at hand.

Along the ‘who benefits?’ line of thinking, a number of circumstances also point to Kiev. These have also been pointed out by Russian observers and compiled into a chronology. The captured Azov Nazis were taken to the Yelenovka detention center in late May. While prisoner exchanges between Ukraine and Russia have included Azov fighters, there is a strong opposition to handing them back over to Kiev, meaning that there’s no guarantee that they would be exchanged in the future – potentially making them a liability to Kiev. By June 20 reports of Ukraine shelling the prison already appeared on Russian channels watching the conflict. On July 28 the confession of an Azov member emerged, claiming that neo-Nazis in Kharkov and Kiev had direct orders from Zelensky’s office to torture and murder Russian prisoners of war. Late that night/early next morning, Ukraine struck the very detention center holding the Azov member who confessed, as well as others who might have done so.

Elsewhere, other neo-Nazis in captivity have confessed to deliberately murdering civilians, a PR disaster for Ukraine, made worse were the prisoners in Yelenovka to follow suit.

Last but not least, just two days before the Yelenovka strike, the US Senate passed a resolution urging the State Department to recognize Russia as a “sponsor of terrorism.” By perpetrating an attack and blaming it on Moscow, Kiev could be aiming to push that decision through – even though the State Department is reportedly reluctant.


Given Ukraine’s multiple attempts to incriminate Russia, and eight years of bombing Donbass civilians, killing their own soldiers is not too far-fetched. In fact, surrendered Ukrainian soldiers have claimed their commanders threatened to shoot them if they attempted desertion, and indeed Ukrainian nationalists firing on them when they attempted to surrender, in one case killing or wounding dozens .

It is left to Russian and DPR doctors to preserve the lives of Ukrainian POWs – even those apparently injured by friendly fire. Outside a Donetsk hospital after the Yelenovka bombing, one of the doctors working on wounded Ukrainians said that five had already had successful surgery for their shrapnel wounds, and two more were to undergo operations.

“It doesn’t matter which side you’re on, we will help you,” he said.

The ghastly scenes of charred flesh and shrapnel-studded bodies I saw at the prison will remain etched in my mind for a long time. Yes, war is ugly, but Ukraine is upping the ante when it comes to both war crimes and hypocrisy.

*Warning: below are extremely graphic images, which I’ve blurred slightly, but still, not for the weak of stomach.*

Image
Image
Image

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/08/ ... an-attack/

More photos at link, if you really need them...

Your tax dollars at work... USA!
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10717
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 05, 2022 12:13 pm

goodbyes
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/05/2022 ⋅ LEAVE A COMMENT

Original Article: Dmitry Steshin / Komsomolskaya Pravda

Image

On Thursday, Donetsk said goodbye to Korsa , the legendary Olga Kachura, colonel of the DPR army, commander of a division of Uragan systems. Vladimir Putin awarded him the title of Hero of Russia posthumously. She was bid farewell at the Donetsk Theater, from where she also bid farewell to the first leader of the DPR, Alexander Zakharchenko, and to the famous commanders Motorola and Givi . But this time, something had changed. Ukraine, in its bestiality and hatred of Donbass and Russia, had never bombed funerals. Today, any humanism that Ukraine had left has disappeared.

At 10:20, my house shook. I have already learned to distinguish arrivals in the center of Donetsk - the window shakes slowly. He was busy with the most important task: collecting the plastic bottles and taping them shut. Two days ago, the Ukrainian artillery attacked the water filtration and pumping stations and the city is dry . There has been no water even at night. I was going to go to one of the saving springs to get some water, but the bombing of Donetsk interrupted the housework.

They attacked Korsa 's funeral with US 155mm howitzers. It may be the only thing with which, from the Ukrainian positions, the center of Donetsk can be reached. Except for the Grad, Smerch and Uragan. Our air defenses have learned how to shoot them down, but they still can't handle the howitzer shells. Despite the supposed accuracy of NATO artillery, the first shells formed a triangle with sides of 200 meters. Either they fired obliquely or the barrels are no longer in good condition. Still, the Ukrainian shells found their victims.

I hid the car in the alley and quickly went down to the underpass under Artyom Avenue [main street in the center of Donetsk- Ed ]. I was full. The population hid there, leaving the determination to go out into the street and continue with their things for later. Grandma Liuda was trying to collect the broken glass from her kiosk: the shrapnel fragments had reached the underpass. With courage and what remains of irony, she told me that “here no one has been injured except the door”.

I went up to the surface. The place was littered with shrapnel fragments in the restaurant of what is surely the best hotel in Donetsk. The press delegations, both ours and the Western ones, have always stayed here. As some Ukrainian propagandists were quick to say: "We have hit where Putin's propagandists go."

A girl lay on the sidewalk in a pool of blood. She was wearing a simple dress that peeked out from the restaurant curtain. Not far away was her dusty bag, crushed in the explosion, and a cell phone battery. It is likely that the woman had the phone in her hand at the time of the explosion. She smelled of spilled blood and explosives. A scent that is not familiar elsewhere.

Image

A waiter was wandering around the restaurant picking up broken dishes. He told me that he had been “very strong” and he made me a recommendation: “Stay away from the façade, there are pieces of the wall and glass falling from above”.

I continued to the theater, which is a stone's throw from the hotel. I walked among traces of blood and red flowers that the population had dropped when fleeing. I think carnations symbolize blood, but I don't remember seeing blood like that at a funeral. The Ukrainian troops have surprised us again. Along with the flowers and shell debris, the wounded were being treated right there. And the T-34 tank was pointed at the sky from its pedestal, more or less towards the place from which the shells had come: the surroundings of Avdeevka, where our army has been advancing for several days. There is no doubt that it will fall. They know it there. And what has happened today in the Republic will be remembered.

In front of the theater was the military truck. Korsa 's coffin must have been transported in the cannon transport. But the whole farewell took place in the shelter, in the basement of the theater. The city center was empty, waiting for a new bombardment.

It started ten minutes after I left. On Gurov Street, a man was seriously injured by shrapnel. The Ukrainian gunners had changed position, but the target remained the same: Donetsk. A city where you don't even have to leave your house to find yourself under fire.

On this occasion, Ukraine claimed the lives of five citizens, including a child. At least five others were seriously injured. But the subconscious says that these eight years of hell are about to end. You don't even need to ask the population, you can see it in their faces. The old slogan "There is no fear!" from the times of the siege of Slavyansk. The only difference from 2014 is that now there is hope in those words.

Image
Korsa, possibly the highest-ranking woman in this war, was going to receive the farewell that the DPR dedicated to Motorola, Givi or Zajarchenko.

korsa
Olga Kachura, Korsa , was born on May 12, 1970. She was part of a family with a strong military tradition: 12 generations.

Until 2012, he served in the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, and since 2014 - in the militia. During the war, she adopted a child and her daughter served in the same unit as her mother. Korsa commanded the division, whose base was in Gorlovka.

Korsa 's death was reported on August 3, 2022. He was returning from combat positions to the rear when his vehicle was attacked. She is said to have been chased by Ukrainian saboteurs.

On August 4, the President of the Russian Federation awarded Olga Kachura the title of Hero of Russia (posthumously).

https://slavyangrad.es/2022/08/05/despe ... more-25210

Google Translator

********************************

War in Ukraine. Summary 04.08.2022August 4, 22:35


Image

War in Ukraine. Summary 04.08.2022

1. Artemovsk.
Detachments of PMC "Wagner" entered Artemovsk and started fighting on its eastern outskirts, taking advantage of the fact that the enemy suffered heavy losses both in defense (under artillery fire) and during an unsuccessful attack on Pokrovskoye. There are also battles for the Merry Valley and on the outskirts of Kodema. Semigorye is completely liberated.

2. Soledar.
Fighting continues in the industrial zone. Bakhmutsky has some progress. Fighting continues near Yakovlevka and Belogorovka. In the area of ​​Seversk, the enemy managed to stabilize the front, fighting continues near Serebryanka, Ivano-Daryevka and Verkhnekamensky.

3. Sands.
In the morning, most of the village was controlled by our troops. By evening, progress was noted in the cleansing and advance to the western outskirts in the direction of Pervomaisky. Nevertheless, reports of the complete liberation of Pesok are still ahead of events, although the fortified area in Peski is not long away. And then either an attack on Pervomaisk or Vodyanoye will follow in order to create a threat to the Orlovka-Avdeevka highway.

4. Avdiivka.
No significant changes. Fighting north of Avdeevka continued along the Avdeevka-Konstantinovka highway near Kamenka, Novoselka-2, Novobakhmutsky, and also on the outskirts of New York. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine generally recognizes the complication of the situation for the Avdiivka group due to the advance of the RF Armed Forces south of Avdiivka. It is also worth noting the ongoing terrorist shelling of Donetsk and other settlements of the Donetsk agglomeration.

5. Slavyansk.
Positional battles continue in the area of ​​​​Sidorov, Bogorodichny, Dolina and Prishib. The Armed Forces of Ukraine claim that they were able to regain control over the destroyed village of Mazanovka, which was located in the "gray zone". The RF Armed Forces continue to deliver concentrated strikes against concentrations of enemy forces in the Slavyansko-Kramatorsk agglomeration, from where the civilian population continues to be evacuated. The Russian Defense Ministry claims that up to 400 enemy soldiers and officers were destroyed in Konstantinovka.

6. Raisins.
The front in the Izyum direction revived somewhat. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reports that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are storming Gusarovka, the loss of which can significantly complicate the situation for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation do not comment on the statements about the storming of Gusarovka.

7. Kharkov.
After the capture of Borshcheva, the RF Armed Forces are pushing in the direction of Kharkov in the direction of Russian and Cherkasy Tishok, as well as in the area of ​​Bayrak and Dementyevka. Nevertheless, the trend towards positionality persists here. Regular rocket attacks continue on Kharkov and Chuguev. The enemy continues shelling the border areas.

8. Krivoy Rog.
The attempts of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to strengthen the foothold on the Ingulets River near Andreevka continued, which has already led to large losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in manpower. Increasingly, instead of statements about an attack on Kherson and complaints about constant attacks on Nikolaev, there are statements about the threat of an offensive by the RF Armed Forces. Nevertheless, the enemy did not give up hope for successful offensive operations in the Krivoy Rog and Nikopol directions.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/59520- zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7779978.html

Google Translator

**********************

Today, Ukraine Bombed a Donetsk Hotel Full of Journalists
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 4, 2022
Eva Karene Bartlett

Image

Another attack from Kiev has hit central Donetsk, targeting a funeral and a hotel where numerous reporters stay and work

At 10:13 am today (Thursday), Ukraine began shelling central Donetsk. There were five powerful blasts in the space of ten minutes. The last explosion blew out my hotel’s ground-floor glass, including a sitting room – where journalists often congregate before and after going out to do field reporting – and the lobby. About one minute earlier, I had passed through the latter. A cameraman’s assistant who was there at the time of that fifth explosion suffered a concussion from the force of the blast.


A woman walking outside the building was killed, as were at least four others, including a child. Donetsk Telegram channels are filled with videos locals have taken, of the dead, the injured and the damage, and of grief-stricken people. One such hard-to-watch Telegram post (warning: graphic footage) features a man in shock at the gruesome sight of the bodies of his murdered wife and grandchild on a street two blocks from the hotel.


The total number of injured is still not known, as I write. First estimates placed the number at at least ten, among them two ambulance workers: a paramedic and a doctor.

Reading the news, you have the luxury of graphic image warnings and the choice not to look at the pictures and videos of the carnage that occurred today, as well as over the past eight years of Ukraine’s war on Donbass. The people here on the ground don’t get a warning, or a choice as to whether they will see the mutilated remains of a loved-one or stranger. As uncomfortable as it is to see such footage, it does need to be shown if the world is to know the truth of what’s going on in Donbass, to give voice to the locals, killed and terrorized by Ukrainian forces as Western corporate media looks elsewhere or covers up these crimes.

Chronology of a bomb strike

When the shelling started, I was in my room editing footage from the previous day – from the aftermath of another shelling of a Donetsk district. You wouldn’t know it from most Western media coverage but explosions are so common here that I didn’t think much of the blast other than it was louder than usual and the car alarms were going off.

Seven minutes later, another explosion, much louder and much closer. From the window, smoke could be seen rising to the north, probably 200 meters away. This would have been right near the Opera House, where the funeral ceremony for Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) Colonel Olga Kachura, killed yesterday, was commencing.

A minute later, another loud blast sent me running from the room, which faced the direction of incoming artillery. Luckily, the only damage ended up being a broken window.

Downstairs, journalists who had been in the hotel and others who had been outside ready to go out reporting, took shelter in the hallway for the time being, ready to run to the basement if things escalated.

One told me he had been preparing to go film and was about 10 meters away from where the last shell struck. “I believe they were trying to target the funeral. And journalists also,” he said. He also said there was a woman outside who had lost a leg, and that she was probably dead by now.

One could assume that Kiev’s forces’ only intended target was the funeral service for Colonel Kachura, aiming perhaps to send a message to the DPR military and the civilians who support it. While that would be egregious by itself, it is likely that a hotel housing journalists was not just ‘collateral damage,’ either.

Ukraine routinely persecutes, censors, imprisons, tortures, and targets media personnel, putting us on kill lists.

Kiev’s forces know a lot of journalists stay at this hotel for its central location and strong wifi. Many frequently do their live reports from outside the hotel. And those staying here, as well as in other central Donetsk neighborhoods, have been loudly reporting on Ukraine’s showering of Donetsk with the insidious, internationally-prohibited ‘butterfly’ anti-personnel mines of late – the latest, until today, in the list of Kiev’s war crimes. These explosives are designed to rip off feet and legs, and Ukraine has repeatedly fired rockets containing them, intentionally dropping them on civilian areas in Donetsk and other Donbass cities.

After the explosions rang out in central Donetsk today, Emergency Services arrived at the scene and, following a period of calm, journalists went out to document the damage and the dead. The woman I’d been told about lay in a pool of blood, covered with what appeared to be a curtain from one of the blown-out windows.

The calm didn’t last long. Ukraine soon resumed shelling, and journalists outside ran back inside as we received another four attacks. “It’s like a common thing, they shoot one place and shoot it again. So we’re in the middle of that process right now,” a Serbian guy near me said. The chief of a local Emergency Services headquarters told me Kiev also makes triple strikes, not only double.

It is said that Ukraine used NATO-standard 155mm caliber weapons in today’s attack. If that is true, this is another instance of Ukraine using Western-supplied weapons to slaughter and maim civilians in the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics.

If by bombing a hotel full of journalists Kiev wanted to intimidate them away from reporting on Ukraine’s war crimes, it won’t work. Most journalists reporting from on the ground here do so because, unlike the crocodile tears of the West for conflicts they create, we actually care about the lives of people here.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/08/ ... urnalists/

Russian Operations in Ukraine (August 4, 2022): Featuring Mark Sleboda
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 4, 2022



Joining me for this update is Mark Sleboda, an international relations and security expert based in Russia, and US Navy veteran.

We will discuss the latest developments in Ukraine including a recent Pentagon briefing and Western media claims made in recent days.

References

War on the Rocks – Ukraine’s Window of Opportunity?: https://warontherocks.com/2022/07/ukr

US Department of Defense – Senior Defense Official and Senior Military Official Hold a Background Briefing JULY 29, 2022: https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcri

CNN – War for the south: Ukraine sets its sights on regaining cities and towns lost to Russian troops: https://edition.cnn.com/2022/07/28/eu

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/08/ ... k-sleboda/

Lucien Cerise: “NATO Threatens France, Western Civilization, and all Forms of Civilization”
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 4, 2022

Image

Lucien Cerise, a social engineering researcher, answers questions from Continental Observer about NATO on the occasion of the new edition of his book, Ukraine, NATO’s Hybrid War, a first edition of which was published in 2017 under the title Return to Maidan – NATO’s Hybrid War.

How do you assess the differences in NATO’s hybrid war between 2017 and today in Ukraine?

Lucien Cerise: The Russian army decided to shift the terms of the conflict by launching a conventional, symmetrical, open operation, thus ending NATO’s hybrid war in Ukraine. Hybrid warfare is essentially based on proxy forces, or “proxies”, paramilitaries and terrorists, fake revolutions, or “color revolutions”, which are real coups d’état, unconventional weapons, whether biological or otherwise, stealth, cunning, secrecy, lies, media complicity and the militarization of civilians, sometimes without their knowledge. The Russian military has decided to put an end to this form of underhanded and indirect warfare launched in Ukraine since 2013 and the EuroMaidan color revolution. For its part, NATO continues its schemes, with morbid staging as in Butcha or on Snake Island, and the use of civilians as human shields or “crisis actors.”

What does the Russian intervention in Ukraine mean for globalization on the geopolitical chessboard?

The West is no longer at the center of the chessboard. A page of world history is turning. NATO is no longer frightening, because we can see its weakness in the face of a serious army. George Bush Sr. had announced in 1992 the advent of the new world order after the fall of the USSR. This parenthesis will have lasted about thirty years.

Why do the Western media ask the French to support Ukraine?

Western media are militarized to conduct psychological operations for the general public. NATO’s clandestine action networks – what used to be called Gladio networks – include two types of operational agents: in the field, they are paramilitaries and terrorists (Daesh, al-Qaeda, Azov regiment, etc.), and in the media, they are networks of civilian sleeper agents, journalists and TV experts, whose mission is to support the morale of the troops, and thus to create popular support for the paramilitaries and terrorists by presenting them as victims.

In Syria, the media asked us to support Islamists, renamed “moderate rebels”. In Ukraine, the media is trying to create empathy for neo-Nazi fighting groups, downplaying their references to Hitler and the Third Reich. NATO’s Spin Doctors, like a certain Jamie Shea, who was famous in the 1990s for turning Western public opinion in favor of bombing the former Yugoslavia, are always at work to convince people who have enjoyed full human rights to kill civilians without reason. The media are thus part of the military device for manufacturing Western consent to war, but also to the war economy that is derived from it. Deprivation and rationing must be accepted. The Russian intervention in Ukraine is only a pretext.

Before February 24, 2022, storytelling, the construction of the masses’ perception of reality (Reality-Building) by the media narrative, made the “health crisis” responsible for the coming “food crisis” and “energy crisis”. Now it is Russia. The change has taken place in a few days. Anything can be blamed on anything. Language is plastic and allows for the invention of new cause-and-effect relationships, no matter how arbitrary and fictitious.

We are in the era of post-truth and post-reality. Material and objective facts do not count, they have disappeared and are replaced by a subjective narrative of events, that of power, which imposes itself on the target subjectivities of the general public because it knows how to touch the sensitive points of the collective unconscious, most often by inverting the aggressor and the aggressed in order to attribute to NATO the place of the savior who is going to intervene and thus legitimize its operations of foreign interference.

How would you describe the current clash between the West and Russia?

This is the real clash of civilizations. Or more precisely, the clash between what remains of Western civilization, which is in the process of collapse and is trying to take the whole world with it, and Russia, which forms a civilization in its own right and does not want to perish. More broadly, in the terms of Jean Baudrillard, it is a clash between the real, embodied by Russia and its allies, and the virtual, the empire of lies, as Putin has called the West. Fortunately, the Brussels regime is a suicidal idiocracy, led by mentally ill and feeble-minded people, and is therefore actively participating in its own destruction.

Is NATO more than a political and military alliance?

NATO is not only a military alliance of a technical nature, it has a political objective which its secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, has described himself on several occasions as the protection of the open society, whose two pillars are replacement immigration and LGBT (“Our free and open societies must be protected”).

NATO can therefore be considered as the armed wing of George Soros and his globalist agenda.

Can we say that NATO threatens France and Western civilization?

NATO is a military organization and considers that its values – open society, inclusive diversity, dictatorship of minorities, etc. – can be imposed by war, if necessary, as we have seen in Ukraine since 2013, and as it was planned for Russia in the medium term. NATO thus threatens France, Western civilization, and all forms of civilization.

More broadly, it is the Euro-Atlanticist regime in Brussels that threatens the world, because the European Union is also at war.

Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian president who emerged from the 2014 putsch, recognized this when he spoke of Ukrainian duplicity over the Minsk agreements, which were supposed to restore peace, but which in fact served to prepare for war and… entry into the European Union: “Nevertheless, the signing of Minsk-2 allowed Ukraine to gain ‘eight years to create an army’ and restore the country’s economy,” Poroshenko said in an interview with Deutsche Welle in June 2022. “We won eight years to continue reforms and enter the European Union,” he added.

In an interview with the Financial Times in May 2022, he had, previously, claimed that “‘the Minsk agreements have bought Ukraine time to build up its army, freezing the conflict with Russia.”

Observateur Continental

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/08/ ... ilization/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply