Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 01, 2023 12:08 pm

Summit for "peace", war soliloquy
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/01/2023

Image

Yesterday, after the information was published last Friday and confirmed by Zelensky's right-hand man, Andriy Ermak, the Saudi authorities ratified that a peace negotiation summit in Ukraine will be held in the country next August. The announcement has caused headlines such as the last hour of the EFE Agency, which stated that "Kiev confirms the start of talks in Saudi Arabia in August for "a just peace"", information that was later expanded to add that representatives will participate in the summit. international. Despite appearances and the mention of peace, this meeting in which Ukraine and its partners aspire to impose their positions on the end of the war should not be confused with a peace summit or with the possibility of starting a real negotiation in Search for a way out of the conflict.August summit in Saudi Arabia, presumably in the city of Jeddah, makes the possibility of a negotiated solution to the war or the start of peace talks in which the parties to the conflict participate even more unfeasible.

And it is that the approach of the summit is not a negotiation between those who fight in the war but a dialogue - in which probably only one party has a voice - between Ukraine and its allies, who would also invite a dozen countries, including India , Brazil, Mexico or Zambia, considered neutral. "However," explained The Wall Street Journal last Friday, "this year's summit would not include Russia." It seems evident that, without the participation of one of the parties in the war, there can be no possible negotiation, so it must be assumed that the objective is another. Of Russia, the article goes on to state that it "has rejected any serious peace talks and has stuck to its maximalist demands for any resolution, including the annexation of territory that her forces do not control right now." Moscow, which began peace talks just days after the invasion and remained in the Minsk process during the seven years in which Ukraine made it clear that it had no intention of abiding by what was signed, has never had the opportunity to reject these conversations since you haven't even received an invitation to attend as a listener. The affirmation of The Wall Street Journal also contrasts with the attitude that Russia maintained in the talks that led to the failed Istanbul summit, from which a draft agreement emerged that Ukraine quickly rejected.

At that time, with Russian troops suffering, but still besieging Kiev and advancing on all the territories south of the Dnieper, Russia was willing to abandon all those occupied lands in Ukraine beyond Donbass, whose independence it had recognized, and Crimea, that eight years ago she had chosen to be Russian. Considering the military situation, such a proposal, in which Ukraine could even have negotiated the borders of Donbass, cannot be considered a victor's peace., in the same way that the Minsk agreements were not, despite the fact that they were described as such by a part of the Western press. Both from the beginning of the Russian military intervention and throughout the seven years of the Minsk process, it was Ukraine and not Russia that clung to maximalist positions that it could not impose and that did not correspond to the reality on the ground. In the case of the period between 2015 and 2022, the Ukrainian demands did not correspond to the document signed in the Belarusian capital under the mediation of Angela Merkel and François Hollande.

In both cases, the real reason for rejecting the compromise was precisely the maximalist position of Ukraine, which was not willing to accept any agreement that did not imply the handover of Crimea, all this despite the fact that the Minsk agreements dealt solely and exclusively with on the status of the territories under the control of the DPR and the PRL. This position has not only not changed, but the war with Russia has given Ukraine one more tool in its attempt to recover the lost peninsula. Volodymyr Zelensky's “Crimean declaration” called for the use of all the tools at kyiv's disposal to achieve the return of the precious territory to Ukraine. At the time of its promulgation, those tools were limited to political and diplomatic pressure and the imposition of personal or sectoral sanctions that did not really affect the functioning of the Russian economy. With Russia's entry into the war and the willingness of its partners to fight against Moscow “to the last Ukrainian”, as Lindsey Graham put it, Ukraine now has the possibility of using military means, including weapons that countries generously send from NATO.

Despite the eight years of war that Ukraine has waged in the Donbass, the real objective has always been the recovery of Crimea, a territory lost not because of weapons but because of Kiev's political attitude in 2014, which gave Russia all the facilities to carry out a clean and fast military operation in which he was aware that he had the favor of the population. The question of Crimea is also one of the reasons why compliance with Minsk was unfeasible for Ukraine, a process that it sabotaged from practically the moment it was signed until the entry of Russian troops into Ukraine left a document empty that never had a chance. to be implemented. The West had not acted against Russia in 2014 and there was no prospect that it would, so implementing the Minsk agreement was seen in kyiv as acceptance of fait accompli in Crimea. That was really the realistic and pragmatic position of Angela Merkel, but also of Barack Obama, both aware that the reality on the ground favored Russia, which had the support of the population for the accession of the territory.

Crimea was also the reason why the Istanbul summit could not result in an agreement. Ukraine was in no way going to give up a strategic part of what it considers its territory unless it found itself militarily defeated or abandoned by its partners, prerequisites that did not exist in March 2022. Boris Johnson's intervention was not necessary to reject the principle agreed that Vladimir Medinsky and David Arajamia seemed to have reached. However, the obvious rejection by Western countries of this principle of agreement is, in itself, more than significant and denotes the commitment to the common war against Russia that continues to be perceived today, especially in the case of the United Kingdom, even more belligerent than USA.

After the breakdown of those negotiations and Kiev's explicit commitment to war to the end, with the declared objective of reconquering Crimea, no political negotiations have been possible, mainly because Ukraine has rejected each of the mediation proposals that have been put forward. countries not directly involved in the war. Indonesia, in a proposal that caused the ire of Mikhailo Podolyak and earned the country the qualification of "friend of the country of Dostoevsky and Lenin" raised the possibility of holding referendums. China presented a twelve-point peace plan that began with "respect for the territorial integrity of all countries." A delegation from several African countries proposed, both in kyiv and in Moscow, a ceasefire and the immediate start of peace negotiations. And Lula da Silva, Despite not presenting a concrete plan, he offered to mediate to achieve a diplomatic solution to the conflict and has sought international allies to boost the search for peace. All these proposals have been rejected. The Ukrainian Foreign Minister has expressed his "concern" about the proliferation of peace plans, which he has described as "absurd". For kyiv, no negotiation is necessary, just acceptance of thepeace plan presented by Volodymyr Zelensky in December 2022 and which has ten points that can essentially be summarized as:

1.Radiological and nuclear safety, a point with which Zelensky intends to demand the unconditional handover of the Zaporozhie nuclear power plant.
2.Food security, a way to demand guarantees for Ukrainian agricultural exports, which are an important source of income.
3.Energy security: aid for the reconstruction of Ukrainian infrastructure and restrictions and price caps on Russian energy exports.
4.Release of prisoners and deportees
5.Territorial integrity of Ukraine according to its 1991 borders.
6.Withdrawal of Russian troops and cessation of hostilities.
7.Justice: creation of an international court to judge Russian crimes. Obviously not the Ukrainians.
8.Protection of the environment, a curious requirement considering that Ukraine has not hesitated to bomb a nuclear power plant.
9.Prevention of future escalation with the construction of a Euro-Atlantic security architecture that includes guarantees for Ukraine.
10.Confirmation of the end of the war through a treaty signed by both parties.

It is no coincidence that there is no mention of the rights of the population among the broad themes that Zelensky raised last winter. Throughout the Minsk process, Ukraine not only made it clear that it would not agree to offer amnesty to those who had fought on the side of the DPR and LPR despite having committed to doing so by signing the agreement, but also passed a law ad hoc to guarantee impunity for its soldiers and worked for years on a law on collaboration, threatening the population of Donbass with criminal charges for collaborationism that included, for example, the teaching professions. Since the start of the Russo-Ukrainian war, kyiv has had the opportunity to put its promises into practice with all kinds of abuses that have been positively commented on by the Western press. Should Crimea be recaptured, where Ukraine openly states its intention to deport 500,000 to 800,000 residents and punish another 10,000 for collaboration, presumably there would be no major objections from human rights defenders either. After all, in the years in which Ukraine has maintained a blockade to stifle the Donbass economy and thus subdue its population, there have been no protests from Western humanitarian sectors.

The objective of this propaganda summit for just peaceIt is none other than reaffirming, with the presence of international representatives, the will of Ukraine as the only way out of the conflict, thus annulling any other proposal that implies a negotiation process. The subtext of the proposal is so evident that some countries have already shown their rejection. Andrés Manuel López Obrador, president of Mexico, announced yesterday that his country will participate in any initiative that involves negotiation between the parties, but he distanced himself from this unilateral act in which only one of them is represented. However, that is the goal. kyiv will continue to fight - as long as its partners supply it with the weapons to do so - until it achieves its objectives, which are so maximalist that even their partners in the Pentagon do not consider them realistic. The just peace that Zelensky craves, thepeace born of its victory , is nothing more than the demand for the unilateral surrender of Russia and the population that in 2014 rose up, by political means or with arms in hand, against the irregular change of government that took place in Kiev, the one Ukraine has been waiting nine years to punish.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/01/cumbr ... more-27839

Google Translator

******

Chronicle of the special military operation for July 31, 2023
July 31, 2023
Rybar

Last night, Russian troops launched rocket attacks on enemy targets in Kharkov : the terminals and hangars of the international airport, from whose territory drones were launched, as well as a metal mesh factory in the Novobavarsky district , where, presumably, there was a drone assembly workshop, were hit.

In the afternoon, the Russian Armed Forces fired an Iskander OTRK missile at the point of deployment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the territory of the Polytechnic College in Krivoy Rog . Ukrainian media accused Russian troops of hitting a residential building, but if this type of ammunition hit the building, much more damage would have been done.

In turn, the Ukrainian formations fired at the front-line settlements of Russia. Throughout the day, the Armed Forces of Ukraine inflicted massive strikes on civilian objects of the DPR : four people were killed, another 14 were injured. In the evening, the village of Basan in the Zaporozhye region was under fire : three civilians were killed, at least 15 were injured.

On the fronts, the situation did not undergo significant changes. The enemy made attempts to break through the Russian defenses in the Starobelsky , Soledarsky and Zaporozhye directions , but all of them were successfully suppressed by small arms and artillery fire.

Image

Russian Armed Forces attack on Kharkov airport

Image
Late in the evening of July 30, Russian forces carried out two strikes on targets in Kharkov . One of the arrivals came to the area of ​​the international airport in the south of the city: an explosion thundered in the area of ​​​​terminals and hangars.

Although the exact scale of the consequences of the raid is currently unknown, the target was clearly not chosen by chance: just yesterday, the odious Ukrainian oligarch and defendant in numerous corruption schemes, Serhiy Prytula , published a video with Bober drones that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are attacking the Russian capital.

High-quality airfield coverage, typical for civil airports, got into the frame. Of these structures, it is the Kharkiv air harbor that is closest to the Russian border, and with a certain probability, the enemy launches Beaver drones into Moscow from there. It is possible that at night the Armed Forces of Ukraine just lost some of these UAVs.

Another target of the strike was a metal mesh factory in the Novobavarsky district , where the drone assembly workshop was allegedly located. Local residents confirmed a powerful explosion and a large fire at the site of the rocket hit.

On the activation of American satellites over the Crimea

Image
It's no secret that Western satellites monitor the situation on the Earth's surface, essentially acting as the final authority in choosing a target for long-range missile strikes.

During this week, the activity of the satellite constellation has increased - on average, American Topazs take 14-15 pictures of various objects in Crimea , compared to 7-10 at the beginning of the month.

And in recent days, special attention has been paid to three objects: the bridge across the North Crimean Canal, the airfield near Kacha and the Voinka railway station on the way to Krasnoperekopsk .

This is without taking into account other objects, such as Gvardeyskoye , which was photographed 29 times in a month. And if we take into account the number of attempts to hit this base, it becomes obvious why they do it.

The threat posed by space intelligence cannot be taken lightly. And at a minimum, it is necessary to take into account which areas the satellites are shooting over and take countermeasures in advance.

On the intensity of shelling over the past week
Ukrainian formations daily release several hundred different types of ammunition in front-line territories of Russia . Compared to last week, the intensity of shelling has decreased: in the DPR and Kherson region by about 9%, and in the Belgorod region by 37%. Nevertheless, a difficult situation persists in each of the regions: dozens of residential buildings and infrastructure facilities have been damaged. In these regions, four civilians were killed in a week, at least 44 were injured.

The enemy is using Western-made cluster munitions to strike at civilian targets. In Lisichansk , a rear school, where a temporary accommodation center for refugees was located for several months, came under shelling: by a lucky chance, there were no casualties. At the same time, over the past week, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have had a number of attacks on the rear regions of Russia. In addition to Crimea, Ukrainian drones attacked the capital three times, damaging two towers in the Moscow City business center and injuring one person in the latest raid. The enemy also attacked Taganrog with an S-200 missile, injuring at least 16 civilians.

Against the background of the lack of significant progress in two months and preparations for the second phase of the offensive, the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will continue such attacks aimed at inspiring the Ukrainian audience and to influence the morale of the Russian population.

The situation on the front line and the fighting

Image
In the north-east of Ukraine, the enemy continues to concentrate resources near the borders with Russia . Small reconnaissance groups operate along the Belgorod , Kursk and Bryansk regions , monitoring the activities of the RF Armed Forces. The other day, one of the DRGs tried to infiltrate into Russia near the village of Zabrama , but was hit by Russian military personnel and retreated back. Curiously, this is not the first attempt to penetrate the territory of the Russian Federation in this area: earlier Belarusian mercenaries from the Kalinovsky battalion were noted in this area.

But the sortie itself is hardly the only one. Subversive groups have been deployed in villages and towns along the border. Two such arrived in Pokrovka , and Turkish citizens showed up in Semenovka . These may be mercenaries who train the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the use of Turkish-made weapons, such as Bayraktar or MLRS. In addition, units of the 3rd tank brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine report the transfer of formations of the so-called "Russian Volunteer Corps" to Olkhovatka and Komissarovka . This indicates a possible activation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Belgorod direction.


In the Starobelsky direction, a tense situation remains along the entire front line: the parties are engaged in positional battles and artillery duels in the Kupyansky , Svatovsky and Limansky sectors . The Ukrainian command is concentrating additional forces on the Svatov sector, preparing for a possible attempt to break through the Russian defenses and advance in the direction of Svatovo . At the same time, to the south near Torsky and in the area of ​​​​the Zhuravka beam , despite numerous counterattacks, the Armed Forces of Ukraine were unable to recapture the positions occupied by Russian troops.

In the Soledar direction , the Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to storm the positions of the RF Armed Forces in the Kleshcheevka area on the southern flank of the Bakhmut defense . Russian units managed to stabilize the situation, but the situation around the village remains quite tense.

In the Avdeevsky sector, the parties are conducting mutual reconnaissance and are concentrating additional forces to the front line. Russian artillery regularly fires at open enemy concentration areas, hitting the personnel and equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Image
On the Vremyevsky site , despite statements about the return of control over StaromayorskyRussian troops, the situation looks somewhat different. There is practically nothing left of the village, and there is nowhere to hide in it. Therefore, it is physically difficult to control Staromayorskoye not only for our units, but also for the Ukrainian formations, which even recently conducted a reconnaissance of the area in search of places to equip strong points. Now Russian troops are conducting a positional attack with artillery support, trying to drive the enemy out of the village. However, Staromayorskoye itself is actually in the gray zone. The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to send small groups to secure the site. One of these came under fire, and they tried to evacuate it on two armored combat vehicles, which were instantly fired upon by artillerymen. Also, Russian units are conducting an intense counter-battery fight.

Image
In the Zaporizhia direction in the morning, the enemy, with the support of two Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, tried to attack the positions of the RF Armed Forces near Rabotino . However, the group's advance was opened, and it was hit by artillery and anti-tank systems - both infantry fighting vehicles were destroyed. At the moment the situation is relatively stable. The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue sorties to the front lines by infantry groups without the use of armored vehicles. One of these was repulsed in the Pyatihatki area . However, judging by the activity of the enemy, attacks will resume in the near future, and not only in the direction of Rabotino. 14 AMX-10 wheeled tanks were transferred to the zone of responsibility of the 108th TRO brigade in the Pologovsky sector, probably from the composition of the Marun tactical group. In addition, several assault groups of the 47th Ombre arrived in Orekhov. Three companies of the 56th, 417th and 423rd rifle battalions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were moved to Kamensky, and the forces of the 14th brigade of the National Guard of Ukraine appeared in Krasnaya Krinitsa .

Russian troops launched a strike from the Iskander OTRK on the deployment point of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the territory of the Polytechnic College in Krivoy Rog .


The Ukrainian media massively disseminated reports about a Russian missile hitting a residential building, but if Russian ammunition hit the building, much more damage would have been done. At the same time, the direction of the rays of the explosion indicates that the projectile flew along a trajectory characteristic of anti-aircraft missiles of the S-300 complex.

Image
In the Kherson direction in the morning on the Goloprystan sector , three Ukrainian DRGs in small boats, moving along the Domakha River, tried to land on Vasilkov Island. The movement of the boats was detected, and they were hit by artillery. As a result, two boats with 10 people were hit, and one went back. However, this sortie is only one of many that have been on this site in recent months. A very unpleasant situation is developing near the Antonovsky bridge, where Ukrainian formations not only hold a bridgehead, but also try to move deep into the territory on the left bank of the Dnieper. Despite systematic fire defeat, the DRGs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are advancing all the way to the southernmost islands, supported by artillery from Sadovoe, and are inflicting harassing strikes on the northern outskirts of Aleshki .

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas

Image
Ukrainian formations continue to fire at the civilian infrastructure of the Bryansk region . In the village of Lomovka , four households, two cars and a power line were damaged. In the village of Sushany , households and outbuildings were damaged. There were no casualties. In addition, last night in the city of Trubchevsk , a UAV drone fell on the building of the police department: the roof and glazing were damaged.

Image
The enemy again struck at the border Glushkovsky district of the Kursk region . In the village of Tetkino, five arrivals at residential buildings were recorded. Several homes were reported damaged. In addition, Krasnooktyabrsky came under fire . At the moment, the settlement is de-energized.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to strike at the border settlements of the Belgorod region . In the Shebekinsky urban district, three private residential households and a power line in the village of Rzhevka were damaged . In Novopetrovka, one of the shells hit the garage, fragments of another ammunition damaged the facade of a private house. There were no casualties.

Image
Throughout the day, Ukrainian formations continue the artillery terror of the civilian population of the Donetsk agglomeration , including using the HIMARS MLRS. The capital of the republic came under massive shelling. In the Voroshilovsky district , administrative buildings, private and apartment buildings, as well as vehicles were damaged: two people were killed and at least ten were injured.


In the Kuibyshev district of the city, infrastructure facilities, residential buildings and shuttle buses were damaged: one civilian was killed, three more were injured of varying severity. Horlivka , Makiivka , Yasinovataya and the suburbs of Donetsk were also under fire . In Gorlovka, a man was killed as a result of the strike, and in Yasinovataya, a water canal was damaged after a drone attack.

Image
In the Zaporozhye region in the evening, Ukrainian formations dealt a massive blow to the civilian infrastructure of the village of Basan . A grocery store came under fire: according to preliminary information, three people were killed and at least 15 more were injured. There was a child under the rubble.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to terrorize the left bank of the Kherson region . In total, at least 29 shells were fired at Kakhovka , Gornostaevka and Korsunka . In the city of Novaya Kakhovka, a cafe came under fire. One local resident was reported injured.

Political events
On the upcoming negotiations in Saudi Arabia on theft

The US State Department confirmed information about the upcoming talks in Saudi Arabia on Ukraine this week . Earlier, the head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, Andriy Yermak, announced the plans of Western partners to hold a meeting with the participation of the countries of the "global South" to develop a "peace formula" in Ukraine.

Mexican President Andres Manuel López Obrador has already spoken about the upcoming event , indicating that the country will not participate in peace talks in Ukraine unless Russia is invited to them . At the same time, he expressed hope for a speedy end to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

Earlier we already wrote about the futility of peace negotiations without the participation of such countries as Russia and China . At the same time, the key goal of the meeting for the Western countries is another attempt to win over the Russian partners in the BRICS, as well as to strengthen the international isolation of the Russian Federation.

Foreign ships again go to the ports of Ukraine on the Danube

Foreign ships are again going to the ports of Ukraine on the Danube, despite the recent shelling of the port infrastructure of Reni . On July 30, several foreign ships passed through the Turkish straits and advanced towards Ukraine. Today, the Israeli ship Ams1 entered the Ukrainian branch of the Danube. It is reported that the ships are accompanied by NATO forces.

It is worth noting that the Danube ports were used to supply arms to Ukraine even before the start of the grain deal and after Russia withdrew from it. However, their throughput is incomparable with seaports.

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator

*****

About "NATO Trained" VSU Units.

Yes, about that--NATO Trained.

(Video at link.)

By now not only this qualifier sounds funny but it becomes down right buffoonish since the inevitable question arises--and what CAN NATO possibly "train" in a few weeks those VSU "elite" units when the WHOLE process of combat training and field manuals of NATO is utterly incompatible with the modern warfare of scale. "Training" just the use of battlefield weapons and some basic unit maneuvering with comms, which are being suppressed brutally by Russian Army at the front-line, using finicky and grossly over-hyped NATO weapons? That's not real "combat training".
Fact is, teaching personnel a physical exertion, while important, in and of itself doesn't even begin to cover a set of requirements for modern warrior who operates under the fire intensity and ISR constrains (for VSU), such as Starlink comms now being suppressed all over the place (in Russian), while maneuvering is de facto impossible without being detected, tracked and annihilated by long-range fires. None of that is known to NATO trainers and that is why even VSU servicemen laugh at this "training". And then, of course, comes this issue of officer cadre. Interestingly, Macgergor speaks about it in his latest video I posted, where he gives (grim) assessment of US service academies. Risking to call the wrath of some people upon me, I dare to state that NATO officer corps education and training is not even in the same league with that of Russia.

Russia's military education never abolished a classic Soviet officer training which amounted to full 6 academic years (5 calendar years) and produced graduate degree military engineers with the undergraduate (Bachelor of Science) equivalent in military science. Purely combined arms (общевойсковые) academies go for 4 calendar (5 academic) years and in all of them, across the board, curriculum is simply grueling--both physically and, especially so, academically. Add here inherently much higher STEM academic level of Russia's public schools where the future military cadets originate and you will understand the abyss which separates command corps' of NATO and Russia. Today it is being paraded in a front of the whole world.

Russia celebrated her Navy Day yesterday and, as is traditional, Putin underscored the commitment for the expansion of Russian Navy. Interestingly, while everyone knows about Russian Navy's big items such as Belgorod or six pr. 22350 (M) FFGs being built, the fact that the announcer of the parade convincingly stated that all "mosquitos" will be armed with 3M22 Zircon, thus dispelling any doubts about "lightening" of Zircon for smaller ships, came as a surprise of sorts.

Image

It goes like this: if you have 3C14 UKSK VLS and Centavr NM satellite comms--you are getting Zircon whether you want it or not)). We should now expect submarine (submerged) launch of 3M22 from Severodvinsk or Kazan very soon, after which Zircon will be procured to subs. Interesting...

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
forwarded from
Special for RT
War correspondent Semyon Pegov, author of the Telegram channel @wargonzo

SHUBIN'S HOUSE

Extremely difficult The situation is now developing in the Velikonovoselkovsky direction, fierce battles for Staromayorskoye, intense clashes in the Urozhaynoye district, the front is not appeased there - it is thundering with all its might. For every inch of land, the guys from the unit that has already become legendary during the NWO, the Cascade OBTF, are cut down there. I know a lot of guys from there, but it just so happened that most often directly on the front line we work with guys from Bely's artillery division. His team plays one of the most important roles in containing the onslaught of the enemy. Many of them, like the commander himself, began their combat career in Sparta - as boys. Now - and especially during this war - they have grown into mature and experienced officers who enjoy unquestioned authority among their colleagues. One of them is Shubin.

He really does look like a Greek athlete: he always wears a branded black cap and a T-shirt with the proud coat of arms of the OBTF “Cascade”. In those days when he was a Spartan, I remember him as a frail, almost slender teenager who broke into the RBI to serve. Now he is not yet 30, but when it comes to organizing the combat process, he talks like an accomplished colonel. Apart from all the jokes. The brains of this miner's breed of people in terms of wisdom and sobriety of assessments work simply in some kind of cosmic turbo mode.In many ways, by the way, due to the fact that all these years of the troubled "Minsk" in the republic there were commanders who allowed such young cadres to grow and develop, and did not beat their hands for another savvy initiative, how to most effectively unwind the enemy. In general, the cadres - their competence and commitment to the result - decide everything, and the team of Bely with Shubin and other fighters together is another and truly vivid confirmation of this.

But now it's about something else. I am often asked by Moscow and other intelligent friends on the mainland (this is how they call that part of Russia that is not shrouded in a network of checkpoints and defensive lines of the NMD): why and for what are we fighting? What is the motivation of the fighters? Frankly, it is not always easy to answer these questions. Because the concentration of tragedy (and it is precisely concentrated in war) is always difficult. Death is always difficult. Anyone who has simple answers to what is connected with death, either did not encounter it, or, to put it mildly, is disingenuous. Therefore, it is not easy to talk about the war, if it is necessary to explain the meaning, its roots, its deep motives. Plus, it's often personal. And when it comes to the personal, I almost always remember the story told by Shubin about his home.

Shubin is from a small Donbass village, which, by the will of circumstances, is now under the control of the enemy. Moreover, this is exactly the same direction in which the OBTF "Cascade" unit is fighting. Once examining his own village from a drone, he saw his village house in which he grew up, and antenna needles sticking out of it, which means only one thing in a war: there is a command post or a serious control post in the building, the antennas indicate the presence of a communication system. Do you know what Shubin did? He ordered an artillery raid on the coordinates of his house. To be erased into dust, so long as the enemy does not have an advantage at the front.And Donbass divisions are full of such stories. How many examples did I know when fighters had to shoot at their own apartments in Mariupol and beyond. How many in the Donbass corps are those whose cities have not been liberated - ahead of Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Konstantinovka ... But in order to destroy the enemy - neo-Nazis and the Zelensky regime - they are ready to go to the end, even when they have to shoot at their own. What kind of motivation should they have? Over the top. Think about it.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the editors.

***

Colonelcassad
2:31
12:54
M.S. Tishchenko, a serviceman of the 54th Ombr of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, went over to the side of the RF Armed Forces.
Being the driver of an anti-aircraft missile battalion of the 54th brigade, Tishchenko surrendered in a service car fully loaded with Igla MANPADS, which he was supposed to deploy to Ukrainian positions.

He switched to the side of Russia voluntarily, contacting the units of the RF Armed Forces via Telegram, at the address indicated on the leaflet, which are permanently dropped on Ukrainian positions with the help of artillery and UAVs.

The defector explained his decision by his unwillingness to serve in the Nazi Ukrainian army and unwillingness to live in Nazi Ukraine, where the Russian-speaking population is oppressed.
According to him, there are many people like him who want to go over to the side of the RF Armed Forces in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and are waiting for Russia's victory in the NMD, and he simply checked the possibility of transferring to the side of the RF Armed Forces and recommends this to his colleagues who remained on the Ukrainian side (1st video - Tishchenko's transition
to side of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
2nd video - interrogation of Tishchenko)
@rtrdonetsk

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

Drone arrival at the Moscow City tower
August 1, 5:53

Image

At night, a small enemy UAV hit one of the Moscow City towers. Damaged 2 offices and glazing in the tower. There are no victims. Another 2 drones were shot down on approach.

Image

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8534645.html

Google Translator

******

Gonzalo Lira Reports Torture in Ukraine Prison, Extortion, Baked-In Conviction Is Inevitable with Sentence of 5 to 8 Years in Labor Camp
Posted on August 1, 2023 by Yves Smith

Gonzalo Lira is alive, as the videos embedded below and a fresh 25-entry tweetstorm attest. However, he has a very ugly story to report. He was detained and repeatedly tortured by prisoners at the behest of guards, so as to create official deniability.

He was allowed to go free by virtue of paying $70,000 in bribes (after having stolen $9,000 of “emergency cash”) plus $11,000 in bail to be set loose before an August 2 trial date, where he was told his conviction was a certainty, despite the prosecution effectively admitting in its own filings that Gonzalo’s only crime was running afoul of Ukraine’s extreme restrictions on free speech. The anticipated sentence was 5 to 8 years in a labor camp. Gonzalo was not given access to an attorney despite claims otherwise.

And predictably, the State Department was not help, due not just to Gonzalo’s critical reporting on the US role in the conflict and outing some Western propaganda, but no doubt more specifically to his video on Russia-hater-in-chief Victoria Nuland, who was just promoted to number two at State. Representatives of the US Embassy did visit him three times, but offered, as Gonzalo put it, only bromides. But apparently there was enough noise made, particularly by the Chilean government, about Gonzalo not being allowed to post bail, so State apparently did eventually clear its throat about that.


The one bit of good news is Gonzalo is fleeing coop and that is apparently what the authorities want. He was told while incarcerated that he was supposed to leave Ukraine after the late time he was detained (but not roughed up then) and didn’t understand the message:
Gonzalo Lira
@GonzaloLira1968
But here's the thing: The conditions of my bail are that I have to wear an electronic monitor, surrender my passports, and not leave the city of Kharkov, much less the country.

HOWEVER—after posting bail, I >didn't< get an ankle monitor—and they >returned< my passports.

*****

Gonzalo Lira
@GonzaloLira1968
·
13h
Later at the SBU offices, they >returned other documents< they'd confiscated—my driver's license and my motorcycle registration.

In Sizo, I told an inmate how last year I'd been detained, released, but told not to leave Ukraine. He laughed. “They were telling you to leave!”
Gonzalo said he is going to Hungary to seek asylum. I would not be so open about my plans unless there were well settled procedures at border checks for asylum seekers… and I would not be confident of Ukraine compliance. Perhaps this announcement is a smokescreen.

Needless to say, the US failure to intervene is yet more evidence this country no longer operates by the rule of law (American citizens are entitled to support of their embassies when abroad), particularly when we have bought and paid for the Ukraine government and are able to tell them what to do.

Gonzalo Lira’s status report is getting traction outside the Twitterverse:

Pro-Russian blogger Gonzalo Lira detained in Kharkiv The New Voice of Ukraine but just reposted on Yahoo, which suggests it will get around

Scratched my left eye with toothpick, cracked rib: US-Chilean journalist describes torture in Ukrainian prison FirstPost

Judge Napolitano and I Talk Intelligence and Gonzalo Lira Speaks Larry Johnson

US-Chilean journalist describes torture in Ukrainian prison RT


And the videos:



[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuvY9l0ShhA[/youtube]



Please circulate widely. More exposure is Gonzalo’s best protection at this point.

I don’t want to sound a sour note, but Gonzalo has repeatedly said the measure of a life is the distance between the highs and the lows. This is an awfully low low, so let’s hope a successful escape validates a positive take on his world view.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/08 ... -with.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 02, 2023 11:38 am

silent diplomacy
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/02/2023

Image

Last week, the Russian opposition outlet The Moscow Times published a controversial article discussing the quiet diplomacy that persists between the United States and Russia despite the war. The existence of contacts between Washington and Moscow is neither a novelty nor a surprise, but confirms the will of both not to cross red lines that could lead to a clash between them. The two countries have the recent experience of intervention in Syria, legal in the case of Russia having been invited by the internationally recognized government and illegal that of the United States, whose presence in Syria is contrary to international law. Despite intervening in defense of forces that fight on different sides, Russia with the Government and the United States at the hands of the Kurdish and opposition forcesmoderate , the contact between the two countries has served to avoid a confrontation between their troops somewhere on the Syrian front.

The current situation is undoubtedly much more complex and compromised. As Ukraine's main ally, creditor, and supplier, the United States is in a privileged position to know what is happening on the front lines and in the rear. The result of the negotiations that took place in February and March of last year shows the importance of the US position in the development of events. In the year and a half of war against Russia, the United States has maintained an ambiguous position, in which, according to the needs of each moment, it has claimed to know in advance the targets that were going to be attacked using US weapons and, in others, defending that Ukraine has autonomy to select the targets and the weapons with which to attack them.Western proxy in a common war against Russia has ceased to be solely part of Russian discourse, the United States has made it clear that its will is to keep the conflict contained within the territory of Ukraine. Hence, in its first acts in the territory of continental Russia, Ukraine always used its own weapons and not those sent by the United States, which it had marked as a red line precisely to attack within the internationally recognized Russian borders. Throughout the war, practically all the red lines marked in the first weeks have been crossed and the containment is now limited solely to avoiding clashes between Russia and the United States and preventing the war from spilling over into the territory of Ukraine.

The Moscow Times article builds on earlier reporting by US NBC , which claimed that a delegation of former US foreign policy establishment officials had recently visited Moscow to sound out Russia's position on a deal. The Russian opposition media refers to the type of diplomacy that is being used, a middle path between official diplomacy between the two governments and the unofficial one that can take place completely in the shadows. In this case, it would be, according to the published information, an option that is not necessarily official, but not completely unofficial either.

This diplomacy, which does not even take place between the two governments, was widely criticized by Ukraine from the moment the information came to light. As happened in the past with the most radical factions of Ukrainian nationalism, which described the continuation of the Minsk process as an unacceptable capitulation, now the official position of the Government is to see betrayal of its cause in any contact with Russia. What's more, some of the most prolific Ukrainian advisers, such as Mikhailo Podolyak, are constantly demanding that their Western partners work for regime change in Russia. For this, any national or international situation is useful. Just yesterday, Podolyak described what is currently happening in Niger as a “supposed « coup »”, where he sees the power in the shadow of Vladimir Putin,

The diplomacy to which The Moscow Times refers refers to a series of regular contacts and not to a sporadic meeting with former members of the already retired establishment as NBC seemed to point out.. One of the anonymous sources mentioned by the outlet claims to have visited Moscow at least once every three months. The meetings, always according to what was published in the latest leaks, take place periodically, at least twice a month. To this must be added the well-known communication between Burns and Narishkin, intelligence chiefs of both countries. These two communication channels respond to two different needs: official diplomacy seeks to control the level of risk of confrontation between the two countries, while the silent one seeks political objectives.

As usual, the publication of this type of information has drawn the attention of the most optimistic, who have wanted to see the possibility of a negotiation between the two countries. As is also the norm, the most alarmist experts or pro-Ukrainian supporters have perceived the possibility of Ukraine being abandoned by its most important partner, the United States. This argument comes from the part of the article in which one of the sources mentioned refers to the attempt to test the Russian position in relation to a possible political negotiation or even a resolution to the conflict.

Taking into account the statements quoted by The Moscow Times , those representatives sent to Moscow are part of the section of the US establishment that seeks to use Russia against Washington's real enemy, China. The argument was raised before the start of the Russian intervention, when this sector proposed to reduce the level of sanctions against Moscow to attract Russia towards Western positions as an element to isolate China. At that time, this position was linked to the right wing of the US establishment and was explicit in broad sectors of the Republican Party, especially those closest to Donald Trump.

“Indeed, we insist that the United States needs, and will continue to need, a Russia strong enough to create stability in its periphery. The United States wants a Russia with strategic autonomy so that the United States can advance its opportunities in Central Asia,” the article states. It is not difficult to understand in this mention the real objective of Washington: to use Russia to counteract the growing power in the area, China. “On the issue of Russia's growing relationship with China, the official admitted that a complete break in relations between Moscow and Beijing is unrealistic. However, an effort must be made to limit the level of relationships," the source added. In a context of increasing sanctions and economic pressure against both countries,

The second task mentioned by one of the sources of The Moscow Times seems clearer : to find out what the Russian position is and, above all, what its objectives are in Ukraine. The outlet cites its sources as presenting the US's unwillingness to negotiate a European-level security architecture as a mistake, a failure to anticipate the need to take Russian concerns seriously. With this argument, and even adding approaches that are even more favorable to the interests of Moscow, this diplomacy mission supposedly semi-official seems to really seek an intelligence objective: to know what are the real objectives, the intentions and the means that Russia is willing to use to achieve them. To do this, the delegation seems not to have hesitated to include an absolutely incredible proposal under current conditions: support Russia in holding referendums to legalize the situation in the Ukrainian territories annexed by Moscow during the war. The proposal is not only contrary to the interests of Ukraine and the actions of the United States in its supply of arms to achieve the recovery of that territory by force, but also to the actions of Washington since the referendum in Crimea took place. Given these contradictions, it is not surprising that the proposal was denied by Russia, which according to the source of the article laments, did not convey what its objectives are in Ukraine either. It is not difficult to see the intelligence nuance in the mission of this delegation, with which it would surely be ill-advised to share any information.

Vladimir Putin's unwillingness to play along with the US leads the article and its source to the inevitable end: if the current Russian president is unwilling to accept the terms and participate in a charade in which Russia is presented with some flagrantly false proposals, it will be necessary to start working on the anti-war figures among the Russian elite “and start making progress with them”. Citing their source, The Moscow Times concludes, explaining that "if there is support among the elite for another leader, he asserted, "overthrowing Putin would not be impossible." Gaining access to circles close to the Kremlin seems to be the real objective of this silent diplomacy , which is neither diplomacy nor silent.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/02/diplo ... more-27847

Google Translator

********

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 1, 2023
August 1, 2023
Rybar

Last night, Russian troops used Geran-2 kamikaze drones to strike targets in Kharkov : one of the targets hit was, presumably, the location of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in one of the local schools.

Ukrainian drones once again tried to attack Moscow : two devices intercepted air defense systems, another was suppressed by electronic warfare, after which it collided with the IQ-Kvartala tower on the territory of the Moscow City business center.

In addition, Ukrainian unmanned boats attempted to attack the Russian patrol ships Vasily Bykov and Sergey Kotov in the southwestern Black Sea - all of them were destroyed by standard weapons fire.

Relative calm remains on the fronts. The enemy is regrouping his forces, preparing for the next phase of the offensive. In the Starobelsk and Vremyevsk directions , the situation did not undergo significant changes, and in the Orekhovsky sector , units of the RF Armed Forces stopped the next enemy attacks.

In turn, Ukrainian formations continue to shell residential buildings and civilian infrastructure in the Belgorod , Kursk , Bryansk and Kherson regions , as well as in the DPR . Unfortunately, there were casualties: according to the latest data, three people were killed and eight more were injured.

Image

Ukranian drone raid on Moscow

Image
Ukrainian formations for the second time in the last three days used drones to attack Moscow . Russian air defense crews intercepted two drones in the air over the Odintsovo and Narofominsk districts of the Moscow region .

Another device was suppressed by electronic warfare, after which it collided with the IQ-Kvartala tower in the Moscow City business center . The facade was damaged at the level of the 21st floor - the glazing of 150 square meters was broken. m. According to some reports, it is on this floor that the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation is located.

On the attack on Russian patrol ships by naval UAVs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

At night, Ukrainian boats again attacked warships of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy northeast of the Bosphorus, which were escorting a Russian tanker sailing from the Mediterranean Sea .

This attack was carefully planned to coincide with the passage of the tanker through the Bosphorus . In the afternoon, a group of unmanned boats left the mouth of the Danube River under the control of the Portuguese-made Tekever AR5 UAV from the Vilkovo airfield , which is used by Ukrainian formations to escort naval drones. This indicates that the drones were once again launched from the mouth of the Danube River.

They took up positions in the waiting area south of Serpentine. Closer to midnight, the R-8A anti-submarine aircraft began to operate off the coast of Romania, which tracked the movement of the Vasily Bykov and Sergey Kotov patrol ships .

After 2 a.m. on August 1, one of the boats tried to hit the Sergei Kotov, bypassing the ship from the Turkish coast. The drone was detected by a visual observation post and hit by a machine gun. Closer to 5 in the morning, two more drones attacked Vasily Bykov with a gap of half an hour, but the appearance of the drones was also revealed, after which they were destroyed. From midnight, 200 km east of Bulgaria, the American UAV MQ-9A Reaper directed boats at the ships of the Black Sea Fleet.

To counter it, a Su-30SM fighter of the naval aviation of the Black Sea Fleet was raised into the air , but the Reaper immediately flew to the Kympiya-Turziy air base , hiding behind a civilian side. In its place, an RQ-4D Phoenix flew in, which tracked the actions of Russian sailors. In this situation, it is important to understand that attacks on warships of the Russian Navy will continue . After the attacks on Odessa, the Armed Forces of Ukraine moved the launch areas for both sea and flying drones to the south - to Vilkovo , Reni and Izmail . And guidance and target designation is provided by NATO reconnaissance aircraft.

On the preparation by Britain of units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for operations in the Crimea
The British Daily Express stated that intensive training of two thousand members of Ukrainian formations by instructors from NATO special forces is underway at the Dartmoor training ground in the UK . Their task is allegedly to capture the Crimea.

According to the publication, the operation will include combined attacks from land, air and sea. It is planned to carry out all stages of the offensive before Christmas, that is, December 25 , given Zelensky's recent decree to change the date of the celebration. It is important to understand that, first of all, such statements are aimed at creating the necessary information picture and psychological pressure on the population of Crimea within the framework of a hybrid war.

This is confirmed by the active information activity of the enemy on the Internet: either they talk about the activities of underground movements, or about the imminent seizure of Crimea, or about imminent attacks on the infrastructure of the peninsula. Specifically, in this case, the replication in all foreign and Ukrainian resources of the direction of the strike and the timing of the start looks suspicious. This may be part of a complex multi-level operation, the result of which will be an attack somewhere on the left bank of the Dnieper.

Still , an attack on Crimea should not be ruled out . Drone raids and missile and crewless boat strikes are likely to be carried out in support of the ground offensive. In recent weeks, Ukrainian SOF personnel have been actively training near Serpentine Island , practicing landing on an unequipped coast. At the same time, the West leaves room for maneuver in case of failure. The British are preparing "elite" assault brigades, but the article makes a very catchy remark: "NATO instructors will give all the necessary data and training to the Ukrainians, but the result depends only on them."

The situation on the front line and the fighting

Late at night, the Russian Armed Forces attacked enemy targets in Kharkov with Geran-2 loitering ammunition . Explosions sounded in Shevchenkovsky and Saltovsky areas . In the latter, several UAVs hit the place of concentration of the personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the school building.

Image
Positional clashes have been going on in the Starobelsky direction near the Karmazinovsky ledge in recent days. Despite the statements of Ukrainian resources, the counterattack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the direction of Novoegorovka and Karmazinovka did not bring any significant results. Enemy sorties by small infantry groups are insignificant. Currently, Ukrainian artillerymen continue to fire cluster munitions from Novosergeevka and Pervomaisky .

However, the concentration of APU in this zone is still high. Particular activity is noted in the fortified area at the turn of Pervomaiskoye - Kopanki , where the Armed Forces of Ukraine have equipped concrete fortifications. In connection with the transfer of enemy personnel and equipment to this area, we should expect the intensification of attacks by the Armed Forces of Ukraine to return the lost positions.

In the area of ​​the Serebryansky forestry , the landing units of the RF Armed Forces continue to roll over the positions of Ukrainian formations with the support of armored vehicles, having taken control of another enemy stronghold.

In the Soledar direction near Bakhmut, Russian troops continue to repel attacks by small enemy groups on Kleshcheevka . At the same time, constant artillery fire is being conducted on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the tactical heights occupied by them to the north-west of the village.

Positional clashes continue in the Donetsk direction in the Avdiivka area and on the western outskirts of Maryinka . Both sides are actively using artillery and unmanned aircraft, trying to prevent the regrouping of units and the supply of ammunition to each other.

Image
Relative calm remains in the Vremievsky sector : after weeks of fighting near Staromayorsky , the enemy does not take active offensive actions and regroups to resume attacks. The village itself is now completely destroyed. However, Russian troops are making sorties in order to improve their positions in the area of ​​the village. The heights around Staromayorsky are still under the control of the RF Armed Forces.

At the same time, Russian servicemen continue to conduct counter-battery fire and destroy equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. To the south-west of Bolshaya Novoselka , they covered the 2B11 mortar crew, and near Neskuchny and Novodonetsk , using FPV drones, they destroyed an enemy tank, vehicle, and UAV launcher.

Image
On the Orekhovsky section , as well as on other sections of the Zaporozhye direction, at the moment there is a relative calm. Russian troops strike at a concentration of enemy manpower and equipment, destroying a D-20 howitzer, a mortar crew, a tank and three vehicles. In the Rabotino area , the Armed Forces of Ukraine launched an attack on the positions of the RF Armed Forces with small forces, but withdrew under fire. Also, Ukrainian formations are actively conducting reconnaissance in the direction of the Mirnoye settlement .


According to Archangel Spetsnaz , early in the morning, a Ukrainian DRG of 16 people tried to enter the village of Pyatikhatky , which has been in the "grey zone" since June. However, the patrol discovered it in a timely manner, and after the shooting battle the enemy went to the starting line.

The intensity of the movement of APU equipment in the area has decreased: after the last unsuccessful attacks, the enemy took it away from the front line so that the armored vehicles would not become victims of Russian anti-tank crews and drones. Ukrainian formations are regrouping to resume the assault on the positions of the RF Armed Forces.

Image
In the Kherson direction, early in the morning, units of the Russian Armed Forces shot down a Ukrainian helicopter from a portable anti-aircraft complex. It is difficult to determine the exact type visually: it could be either Mi-24 or Mi-8.

The pair took off from the Dolgintsevo airfield to strike with unguided missiles at the positions of the Russian Armed Forces from the Zolotaya Balka - Mikhailovka line . However, the military personnel of the RF Armed Forces knew about the route of the enemy's movement and set up an ambush.

The footage shows the moment of the crash of the first helicopter. The second side tried to approach the crash site, however, due to the heat traps that worked on the crashed Mi-8/24, it was forced to take off into the air and leave the area.

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas
Ukrainian formations again tried to attack the Crimean peninsula. Russian air defense systems intercepted an air target in the Kara-Koba area . A powerful explosion occurred at the crash site, after which a thick column of smoke rose. In addition, there was a fire of grass and bushes, which fire brigades quickly eliminated.

Image
Ukrainian formations fired at the village of Churovichi in the Bryansk region . The enemy fired at least eight shells, several houses and cars were damaged, as well as a medical outpatient clinic, the settlement was partially de-energized.

Image
Ukrainian formations made another shelling of the border area of ​​the Kursk region . In the village of Elizavetovka , two houses and one car were damaged as a result of shelling.

Image
Strikes continue in the Belgorod region as well . In the Shebekinsky urban district, the villages of Surkovo and Murom , as well as the village of Krasnoye, were hit . In the Grayvoron urban district , the villages of Bezymeno and Kozinka were shelled .

Image
Ukrainian formations continue to terrorize the civilian population of the Donetsk People's Republic , inflicting multiple strikes, including with cluster munitions.

In the Petrovsky and Kuibyshevsky districts of the DPR capital, at least five apartment buildings were damaged, two people were injured, and one woman died. As a result of the shelling of Yasinovataya with cluster munitions , two people were killed and two more were injured. It is possible that in the near future the list of victims may be replenished.

In Dokuchaevsk, a passenger bus Makeevka - Yasinovataya came under fire , miraculously there were no casualties. In Panteleymonovka, as a result of the shelling, three people were injured, and civilian infrastructure was damaged. Among other things, throughout the day, strikes were carried out on Gorlovka , Makeyevka , Svetlodarsk , Golmovsky and Zemlyanka . Only at the current moment the enemy has fired over three hundred shells at the settlements of the republic.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to fire daily dozens of shells from cannon and rocket artillery along the left bank of the Kherson region.

Under fire were residential buildings and infrastructure in Novaya Kakhovka , Kakhovka , Cairo and Tavriysk . In addition, Russian air defense systems intercepted several UAF drones in the area of ​​Novaya Zburyevka and Radensk . During yesterday's day, the enemy attacked five settlements, including Novaya Kakhovka , where three civilians were injured of varying severity.

Political events
About new lawsuits in Ukraine

In Ukraine, more and more high-profile cases of corruption among local military commissars continue to appear, enriched by mobilization. The SBU announced the detention of an employee of the Mirgorod military registration and enlistment office in the Poltava region . According to the investigation, for six thousand dollars he forged the conclusion of the military medical commission about unfitness for military service. Other employees of the Mirgorodsky and Lubensky TCCs also participated in this scheme . In addition, a similar situation occurred in the Dnepropetrovsk region , where the regional military commissar managed to enrich himself by 350 thousand dollars since the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine .

All these figures cannot be compared with the scale of the corrupt activities of the ex-military commissar of Odessa Yevgeny Borisov , who managed to make a fortune of more than 200 million hryvnia , but they are indicative of a general understanding of the situation in Ukraine. Earlier, we have already pointed out that the ongoing “purges” in the ranks of the security forces are an attempt to show their Western patrons the vigorous activity of reorganizing law enforcement agencies and the judiciary.

In addition to corrupt military commissars who help citizens evade military conscription, there are groups of people who report in instant messengers about the places where subpoenas are distributed. The administrators of one of these Telegram channels from the Cherkasy region were sentenced to five years in prison for “obstructing mobilization.” It is possible that soon the authorities will announce mass raids on such persons. Especially considering the fact that due to significant losses on the fronts, the authorities are completely unprepared to slow down the pace of mobilization measures.

On the fate of Turkish bulk carriers stuck in Ukraine

The Turkish edition of Son Dakika writes that the Turkish authorities are negotiating with Russia and Ukraine regarding the withdrawal of Turkish ships from Ukrainian ports stuck in Ukraine after the end of the grain deal. Probably, we are talking about six bulk carriers that were locked in the harbors of Nikolaev and Olvia in the Dnieper-Bug basin. They were supposed to leave in May, but due to the actions of the Ukrainian authorities, the agreements were thwarted.

After the termination of the grain corridor, many countries began to call and demand that Russia return to the deal. In this case, the thesis about the need to release the ships and the fault of the Russian Federation in the current situation is a method of pressure. Only now the Turkish ships were locked up solely because of the actions of the Ukrainian side and the constant threat to shipping in the Black Sea basin. With ongoing attacks on Russian warships, the situation is unlikely to change.

About another blow to history

In Kiev, the process of dismantling the Soviet coat of arms from the Motherland monument was completed. Acting Minister of Culture Rostislav Karandeev said that the dismantled elements will be stored in the Museum of the History of Ukraine in World War II. He also said that the dismantling of Soviet symbols on the monument would be completed by the Independence Day of Ukraine.

Against the background of this news, a member of the State Duma Committee on Defense, Lieutenant General Andrey Gurulev , commenting on today's attack by Ukrainian drones on Moscow, proposed to strike at the Kiev monument "Motherland". Nevertheless, the structure itself continues to be of cultural value - in turn, in the face of a shortage of ammunition, strikes on such objects are a luxury. Especially when there are much more significant goals.

On the preparation by Britain of units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine for operations in the Crimea
The British Daily Express stated that intensive training of two thousand members of Ukrainian formations by instructors from NATO special forces is underway at the Dartmoor training ground in the UK . Their task is allegedly to seize the Crimea . According to the publication, the operation will include combined attacks from land, air and sea. It is planned to carry out all stages of the offensive before Christmas, that is, on December 25, given Zelensky's recent decree to change the date of the celebration.

In such statements, it should be understood that, first of all, they are aimed at creating the necessary information picture and psychological pressure on the population of Crimea in the framework of a hybrid war. This is confirmed by the active information activity of the enemy on the Internet: either they talk about the activities of underground movements, or about the imminent capture of Crimea, or about imminent attacks on the infrastructure of the peninsula.

Specifically, in this case, the replication in all foreign and Ukrainian resources of the direction of the strike and the timing of the start looks suspicious. This may be part of a complex multi-level operation, the result of which will be an attack somewhere on the left bank of the Dnieper.

Still , an attack on Crimea should not be ruled out . Drone raids and missile and drone strikes are likely to be carried out in support of the ground offensive. In recent weeks, the personnel of the Ukrainian SOF have been actively training near Serpent Island, practicing landing on an unequipped coast. At the same time, the West leaves room for maneuver in case of failure. The British are preparing "elite" assault brigades, but the article makes a very catchy remark: "NATO instructors will give all the necessary data and training to the Ukrainians, but the result depends only on them."

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

Do countries want peace on Western terms?
August 1, 2023
Author12

Negotiations are scheduled for August 5-6 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The meeting will discuss the "Ukrainian formula for peace", which, of course, does not take into account the interests of Russia.
It is expected that delegations from 30 countries will be represented at them, Russia is not among them.

It is not difficult to imagine the prospects for such a gathering: they are aimed at promoting the media narrative about supporting Ukraine in the Middle East, which is hardly true.

The UK, India, Brazil, Indonesia, Egypt, as well as Chile and Zambia were invited to the talks .

Mexico has so far refused to participate in these talks on Ukraine. The Czech Republic and Poland confirmed their participation.

The talks should culminate in a summit later this year where the leaders will sign on to common principles for resolving the conflict. These principles should become a negotiating position in relations between Ukraine and Russia in favor of Kyiv.

https://rybar.ru/hotyat-li-strany-mir-n ... ah-zapada/

Diplomats from the Polish Foreign Ministry know more about the escalation than the Polish military
August 1, 2023
Author12

Diplomats from the Polish Foreign Ministry know more about the escalation than the Polish military
Residents of the village Belovezh in the Podlaskie Voivodeship was noticed by Belarusian helicopters near the Polish border.
Initially, the Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces emphasized that none of the helicopters crossed the border of the republic. However, it is indicated that "the impression could be created that they were on the Polish side." A Mi-24 attack helicopter was spotted in the sky, probably accompanied by a multi-purpose Mi-8.

Image

Earlier, the Belarusians announced that on August 1 they would carry out patrol flights at the border until the evening, and this is what the residents of Bialowieza saw.

Image

However, later the Polish Foreign Ministry demanded that the Belarusian side explain the violation of airspace by military helicopters, describing what happened as "another element of the escalation of tension on the Polish-Belarusian border."

The Polish defense ministry said they would further strengthen their military presence on the border with Belarus.

In turn, the Belarusian Ministry of Defense called the accusations far-fetched, made for "yet another justification for building up forces and means near the border."

📌 It is more likely that the Polish authorities will use the incident for this. Whether there was a violation or not, the very fact of the appearance of Belarusian helicopters in the sky became another argument in the militant rhetoric, according to which "Poland's borders are under threat."

Author12

https://rybar.ru/diplomaty-iz-mid-polsh ... e-voennye/

Google Translator

******

Russia foils Ukrainian attack on Black Sea Fleet

Image
The enemy ships were destroyed with the weapons of the ships themselves | Photo: EFE
Posted 1 August 2023 (3 hours 31 minutes ago)

The attack, carried out with three unmanned boats, was directed against the patrol ships Sergei Kotov and Vasily Bykov.

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation reported that its naval forces managed to repel a Ukrainian attack against ships of the Black Sea Fleet anchored 340 kilometers southwest of the city of Sevastopol, on the Crimean peninsula.

The attack, carried out with three unmanned boats, was directed against the patrol ships Sergei Kotov and Vasily Bykov, which were carrying out navigation control tasks in the southwestern part of the Black Sea. The military entity stressed that the enemy vessels were destroyed with the weapons of the ships themselves.

This constitutes another attempt by the kyiv regime to hit Russian surface units or military installations in Black Sea ports. On July 25, two remote-controlled maritime vehicles unsuccessfully tried to attack the patrol ship Sergei Kotov.


Earlier, on July 16, Ukraine attempted to attack port facilities in Crimea with seven drones and two unmanned boats. Drones were also used the next day, July 17, when two hits against the Crimean bridge killed a couple and injured their daughter.

After suspending the grain agreement due to the violations by the opposing party, Moscow declared that from July 20 ships sailing to Ukrainian ports will be considered war targets as possible carriers of military cargo and the countries whose flag flies on the ship as participants in the conflict.


In response to Ukrainian attacks on its ships and maritime installations, Russia carried out high-precision bombing strikes against kyiv's military installations, including the port city of Odessa.

The spokesman for the Russian Defense Ministry assured that targets such as fuel depots, maritime and air drone assembly workshops, Western war material storage facilities and foreign mercenary accommodation centers were effectively hit.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-fr ... -0007.html

Google Translator

******

Sanctions Are Working / Have Failed

Susan found and sent these:

Spectator, Aug 6, 2022 - Sanctions are working – whatever Putin says

Image

Spectator, May 13, 2023 - Why the economic war against Russia has failed

Image

Similar headlines or sentiments will be found in pretty much any other 'western' magazine that still has some integrity.

The catastrophic consequences of sanctioning Russia without any realistic assessment of its, and one's own economies should have led to a serious clean up of all state and international bureaucracies involved in it.

Alas, we have yet to see that anyone who was involved has been punished for these horrendous mistakes.

The very same people are now involved in finding 'solutions' for the mess their shortsightedness created.

It is no wonder then that people will vote for anyone other than those in charge.

Posted by b on August 1, 2023 at 6:31 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/08/s ... l#comments

******

The reverse side of Western Lend-Lease
August 1, 3:56 p.m

Image

The reverse side of Western Lend-Lease

In the conditions of information warfare, according to tradition, the enemy tries to blame his failures on the opponent. At the moment, Russia continues to be accused of barbaric shelling, as a result of which the Transfiguration Cathedral in Odessa was destroyed. Although the temple belongs to Zelensky’s “hated” Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, the authorities in Kyiv decided not to miss the chance to blame Russia for the attack on the religious building. At the same time, an objective investigation was not conducted, and, accordingly, the responsibility placed on Russia can be replicated.

According to the data provided by our like-minded people, the real cause of the strike is the use by Ukraine of the German IRIS (Infra Red Imaging System) anti-aircraft missile system, which, according to experts, has a number of design flaws and has not been tested in combat conditions. The manufacturer IRIS (Bodenseewerk Device Technology, which merged with Diehl Munitionssysteme GmbH & Co.K in 2004) has been trying to implement the developed system for a long time, presenting it at gun shows. Trying to commercialize IRIS, the Germans assumed that the system would work in conjunction with the American Patriot system (shifting responsibility - sorry, "delegation of authority"). If in the American version we see a layered air defense system (in the Patriot, THAAD, Evanger and Stinger chain),

By agreement between Kiev and the German side, Patriot systems were turned off, instead of which IRIS installations were activated. In fact, Germany managed to convince Ukraine to buy its irises, while the entire collective West is supplying weapons to Kyiv free of charge as part of a general anti-Russian course. According to the information we have, the Germans have been trying for a long time to implement their air defense systems at various arms exhibitions and, finally, “pushed” them into Ukraine. "Irises" that fly, redirecting to objects that are a source of closer thermal studies. For example, rooftops heated by the sun can become such targets. Since it was the IRIS system that operated in the area where the Transfiguration Cathedral in Odessa was located, it is quite natural that the attack on the temple was inflicted by German sub-systems. For the temple is not a military target, and our guidance systems do not allow mistakes. Otherwise, your admin, passing data on the location of temporary deployment points of the Armed Forces of Ukraine "where necessary", has already destroyed about 100 schools and kindergartens.

The unforeseen direction of the IRIS missile strike on the Odessa temple is a consequence of problems with the “brains” of the system itself. Now the question is for the leadership of Ukraine, which is planting its air defense system on German systems, which are de facto being worked out “at their own” facilities. It is unlikely that even Kyiv itself is interested in Berlin sending its marriage to "protect" the sky in Ukraine.

What we are actually facing in the case of IRIS is that this type of missile is slightly modified in the air-to-air class, while maintaining sensitivity to thermal radiation and traps. And if the control point is at a significant distance from the launcher itself and it loses the source of the signal, then the brains of the rocket lose their orientation and begin to look for targets in a spontaneous mode. Draw your own conclusions.

@Multi_XAM - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8535961.html

Google Translator

******

Hazard pay approved: Pentagon prepares to expand troops in Ukraine
July 31, 2023 Gary Wilson

Image
U.S. troops in Poland, near the Ukraine border. In July, President Biden authorized an addition 3,000 reservists to join more than 12,000 troops in NATO countries surrounding Ukraine. Is this troop buildup in preparation for “boots on the ground” in Ukraine? Newsweek reported that in July NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced a support package for Ukraine that would “result in the U.S. eventually sending soldiers to fight in thw war against Russia.”

The Pentagon has approved hazard pay for U.S. troops serving in Ukraine, paving the way for a possible expanded presence. Military Times reported July 27 on the new hazard pay policy.

Troops who qualify will get back pay as far back as April 24, 2022.

“Grier Martin, who is temporarily serving as the Pentagon’s top personnel official, approved the change in a July 13 memo, which was posted to the unofficial ‘Air Force amn/nco/snco’ Facebook page,” Military Times says.

The approval of hazard pay is seen as a sign that the Pentagon is preparing for a possible expansion of the U.S. military presence in Ukraine. The Biden administration has steadily increased the number of special forces “advisers” and trainers in the country. While calling them advisers and trainers, they actively participate in the war.

Washington has a long history of entering wars this way, from Vietnam to Central America to Afghanistan. The U.S. initially claimed it was not sending “boots on the ground” to Vietnam, but eventually, there were over 500,000 U.S. troops in Vietnam. The U.S. also claimed that it was not sending troops to El Salvador, but eventually, over 500 U.S. special forces were operating in El Salvador, commanding the Salvadoran military dictatorship.

Washington won’t say that it is directly involved in combat in Ukraine. It can be expected to stick to euphemisms (advisers or security details) to describe its activities. The euphemisms are its way of expanding involvement, hoping no one will notice the increasing numbers of troops on the ground.

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2023/ ... n-ukraine/

Well, mebbe, and mebbe they're just catching up on their losses previously incurred, like Major General Potts.

******

Ukraine: Nato slams the door

The Vilnius summit was supposed to be a show of strength. Instead, it highlighted the weakness at the heart of the imperialist alliance.
Proletarian writers

Monday 31 July 2023

Image

It has been pointed out that one of the reasons the imperialists are loath to admit Ukraine into Nato’s ranks is that if they were to do so, they would either have to go all in on their arms-length war against Russia, which they would in all likelihood lose, or renege on the mutual defence clause of the alliance’s constitution. Either way, Nato ‘protection’ would be revealed as a sham and the alliance would be rendered defunct.

When the Nato warmongers first began to prepare for their Lithuanian jamboree in July, hopes ran high amongst the credulous – especially those whose evaluation of the Ukraine war’s likely outcome rested more on Hollywoodised western propaganda narratives than on troublesome facts about armies, artillery shells, air cover and the like.

Surely, with the long-awaited Ukrainian ‘counteroffensive’ finally under way, backed up by a seemingly unceasing stream of lethal weaponry pouring into Kiev’s lap from all over Europe and with every western government parroting the solemn vow to ‘Stand With Ukraine’, Nato would now strike whilst the iron was hot and welcome UkraineUkraine into the thieves’ den to universal acclaim.

But by the time the thieves finally gathered in Vilnius on 11 and 12 July, it was glaringly obvious that there was precious little to celebrate.

Failure is an orphan
The ‘counteroffensive’ on which the collective west had staked so much turned out to be a non-event, and when the smoke had cleared Nato stood revealed as a house radically divided against itself, with as many views on what to do with Ukraine as there were participants in the conference.

This uncertainty in direction for the alliance was reflected in its difficulty choosing a new leadership that can speak with a united voice.

Failing to pick a new frontman (or, even better, frontwoman), a reluctant-looking Jens Stoltenberg had to be been hauled back in to serve a third term, in the forlorn hope that his ‘safe pair of hands’ will enable the bickering crew to muddle through the current crisis. (Britain’s defence secretary Ben Wallace put his own hat in the ring but was roundly rejected, leading to a string of bitter recriminations in the British media.)

The final communique from the assembled heads was a masterpiece of obfuscation and self-contradiction. While restating that Nato’s ultimate goal is still to accept Ukraine into the club, it in the next breath declined to name the day when any such invitation might actually arrive, muttering that Kiev might get its invite (or just the bare promise of one) “when Allies agree and conditions are met”.

Jam tomorrow, in fact.

Don’t you know there’s a war on?
A key ‘condition’, demanded by Washington, London and Berlin, is that Ukraine must not be in the middle of a war with Russia when the accession machinery creaks into motion.

Heaven forfend that Nato might be obliged by the terms of its constitution (Article 5) to come to the aid of one of its members! Clearly, the prospect of committing themselves to full-scale open warfare with Russia and shifting the front line closer to home is not one that sits well with the imperialists just now.

In short, Nato will be happy to honour the promises it made to Ukraine back in 2008, just so long as they do not relate to the actual war unfolding now – a war promoted, armed and bankrolled by Nato. By all means, go ahead and prevail against Russia if you can, but if you cannot, don’t come knocking at Nato’s door and waving Article 5.

Pressure on Nato to deliver a precise and unambiguous roadmap towards accession came most sharply from Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic states, all controlled by proxy governments that are eager to nail down the USA on its airy promises of rewards for services rendered.

Meanwhile, neither Washington nor Berlin are keen to become directly bogged down in a war they cannot win, although they are happy to keep throwing ‘disposable’ east Europeans into the trenches in the hopes that something might come along to rescue the whole endeavour if they can just keep the conflict going for long enough.

Imperialism has no permanent friends
Ukrainian puppet actor-president Volodymyr Zelensky and the fascist junta in Kiev have every reason to denounce Anglo-Saxon imperialism for its treacherous double-dealing.

The USA and Britain egged on the Maidan fascists, supported the pogroms in the Donbass, encouraged Kiev to tear up the Minsk accords, actively dissuaded Zelensky from finding an early resolution to the conflict, and throughout it all continued to pour weapons into the Ukraine.

It did all this, and then Nato turned around at the Vilnius conference and told Zelensky effectively: Sorry, you can’t join Nato because we notice you are in the middle of a war.

Or, as one commentator neatly summed it up: “Nato is now using the very war it has done everything to fuel as a pretext to stop Ukraine from joining the alliance”. (Nato isn’t defending Ukraine. It’s stabbing it in the back by Jonathan Cook, Middle East Eye, 14 July 2023)

The proxy ‘president’ recently dubbed by Scott Ritter as ‘Agent Zelensky’ will now take his place in the long and winding queue of jilted imperialist stooges, cast aside as surplus to requirements – like the sad turncoats helicoptering off the US embassy in Saigon and the collaborating translators and fixers stranded in Afghanistan as pet dogs caught the last plane out.

https://thecommunists.org/2023/07/31/ne ... -the-door/

******

Vilnius Memo: Who’s Going to Bankroll This War?

Martin Jay

August 1, 2023

Most western leaders know that the time is up. They know that three key elections are going to play a huge role in putting the brakes on the campaign to continuously supply the Kiev cabal.

Apparently it wasn’t Abert Einstein who said “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results”. But we like to think it was, so it became a quotation attributed to him. How else to describe the West’s stalwart determination to impale itself further with the agony of the Ukraine war as we are now led to believe that NATO and the U.S. are determined now to dig in for a long war. The belief is still upbeat, despite the huge anti-climax of Ukraine’s so-called “offensive” which didn’t even break through the Maginot Line which Russia has built along a 900-km fortified line.

The blinded dogma of NATO members at last month’s Vilnius Summit stems from being drunk on their own fake news which media dutifully pumps out each day from the propaganda factory in Kiev. There’s just so much of it, that it’s hardly surprising that Biden and his European lap dogs overconsume on it without looking at the hard facts. It isn’t simply that Ukraine “has run out of ammo” as Biden put it. It’s more than that. It’s that it has been proven over and over again that they don’t have the will, resources or rank ability to take on the Russian army and that sending more and more military hardware will only delay the inevitable loss. Or at least armistice which is bound to happen on an unofficial level at some point, if an official one can’t be signed.

Zelensky looked worried at the Vilnius conference. And it’s hardly surprising. Even when you look at the pledges made by western countries for military hardware, there’s no question that the speed of these deliveries and the actual quantity has radically dropped. So how can Ukraine or NATO believe that it can win the war, even in years to come? Fighting a war without ammunition is like baking bread without flour, after all.

The truth is that most western leaders already know that the time is up. They know that three key elections are going to play a huge role in putting the brakes on the campaign to continuously supply the Kiev cabal, who by some accounts, are buying 7 million euro villas in Cannes with the money which is being syphoned off. War is a racket after all and Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Should we be surprised that a government minister there has this kind of cash to blow on a wedding present for his offspring?

The three elections are of course the UK general election, The U.S. presidential elections and the European parliamentary elections. All three will take place at the end of 2024 and it will be the first real time people will have the opportunity to make a statement about the war and the abysmal hardship it is imposing on people in western countries. It’s as though Joe Biden knows also that it will be very hard for him to stand again as president when he has to explain why he has sent over 130 billion dollars of taxpayers’ money to a country that few Americans can even find on a map of the world.

Money matters. Finally, it matters. The argument on the American side that it doesn’t matter as it is being printed and given over to the industrial military complex has some validity, as this secures jobs and keeps these companies buoyant. But it’s public money. And so, rightfully, people will want to know why couldn’t the same money be spent on the very poor.

For the Europeans it’s very different. They pay a very high price for the Ukraine war and the folly of their governments who indulge themselves with the military aid like children gouging themselves on chocolate cake while the parents are away. Germany’s economy is flat broke. For the UK, homeowners are facing losing their house due to colossal mortgage rate hikes with an entire generation now unable to get on the housing ladder. How will these politicians explain this at the polls?

It really is about the money. NATO knows that it needs much more than just the miniscule offering of 2 % of GDP, which in reality only 11 NATO members adhere to. All western countries’ military stockpiles are depleted and so, not only does NATO and its members need to find trillions of dollars of new cash just to bring their stocks back up to what they were, but also trillions more for Ukraine. The numbers just don’t add up. Even on an EU level, Ursula von der Leyen, who is almost certainly going to be NATO secretary general, when her term as EU Commission president runs out in about a year, has her begging bowl out. She is hoping to raise 20 billion euros to be given to Ukraine over 4 years as military aid. For the Ukraine war, it is pretty meagre.

For the EU itself, there is no clear sign how she will get it when she is already asking member states to contribute 30 billion euros more to the budget to pay for another egregious scam of COVID vaccinations, which at one point she was being accused of having corrupt connections to, until colleagues managed to cover the scandal up. Europe not only has no cash or military kit left to offer Ukraine, it has serious financial problems to tackle of its own for its own elites to retain the power they wield. The only respite would have to be much more cash from the U.S. only which is probably not what Biden is planning on. The Europeans have paid too much. We are an empty Amazon warehouse with all the workers at the foodbank.

https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023 ... -this-war/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 02, 2023 7:56 pm

Vilnius NATO Summit Was a Farce Reinforcing an Imperialist Alliance that Should be Abolished
By David Starr - August 1, 2023 0

Image
[Source: fair.org]

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Summit, held in Vilnius, Lithuania, on July 11 and 12, provided a showcase for an imperialist alliance that has been a major source of war for decades.

Committing to a major NATO force buildup, world leaders at the conference pledged fealty to Ukraine, which is ranked among the most corrupt countries in the world and has deliberately stoked a war with Russia that threatens to ignite World War III.

The NATO Summit’s communiqué was typical in its over-glorifying rhetoric. It starts off in the following way:

“We, the Heads of States and Government of the North Atlantic Alliance, bound by shared values of individual liberty, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law, have gathered in Vilnius…to reaffirm our enduring transatlantic bond, unity, cohesion, and solidarity at a critical time for our security and international peace and stability.”

Image
[Source: theprint.in]

There is a lot in that statement to contradict NATO’s real objectives, that is, taking on an imperial role outside of its jurisdiction.

Russia, of course, was demonized:

“Russia bears full responsibility for its illegal, unjustifiable, and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine…We continue to condemn in the strongest terms Russia’s blatant violations of international law, the Charter of the United Nations, and OSCE commitments and principles.”

The rest of the rant essentially says the same thing: Russia is strictly the “bad guy.” Hypocrisy flies in the face of these statements.

The communiqué concluded that “NATO remains the strongest Alliance in history. As in the past, we will stand the test of time in safeguarding the freedom and security of our Allies and contributing to peace and security.” (And to hell with the rest of the world.)

Other countries were mentioned in the Summit, but Ukraine became a special topic. The New York Times’s Steven Erlanger, writing a piece that sided with NATO, admitted that there were divisions in the Summit, particularly regarding Ukraine.

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, a neo-liberal and corrupt leader, pushed for the admission of Ukraine into NATO, but some NATO members wanted it postponed for now until the war ends, and Ukraine meets certain qualifications.

Image
Advertisement on side of bus in Vilnius during the Summit. [Source: theguardian.com]

This did not please Zelensky and his Central European supporters who “wanted more and made it loud and clear.” Zelensky “was angry about NATO putting conditions on even inviting Ukraine to apply for membership.”

But in regard to being treated as an equal by NATO members, Zelensky at one point was ignored as others were engrossed in conversation. There is a photo online showing Zelensky alone and with a pissed off look on his face. It appeared Zelensky was not a part of the NATO crowd.

Image
[Source: dfrac.org]

However, Zelensky ultimately declared the Summit a victory after he received multiple assurances that Ukraine would be invited to join NATO once the war with Russia ends, along with concrete plans to provide Ukraine with security guarantees well into the future.

Notwithstanding the views of Ukraine, the whole Summit was really a farce: There was talk of peace when the NATO alliance is really provoking war and dividing the world into opposing camps in a manner reminiscent of the era of World War I and the Cold War when it was founded.

The U.S./NATO alliance continues to push for military solutions and eschew peace.

In mid to late June 2023, the alliance put on a show of strength with a new round of war games. Germany invited the U.S. and other nations of the alliance to simulate an air war over most of Europe. John Wojcik, Editor-in-Chief of the People’s World, wrote that it was “the biggest war provocation in history in its airspace,” noting that it involved “10,000 armed participants from 25 countries.”

The U.S. sent “2,000 Air National Guard members and more than 100 of the 250 jet fighters that [participated].” The alliance also used ships to “close in on European coastlines in their massive simulation of what they say NATO would have to do if it were necessary to defend an attack from—or mount an attack on—Russia, China, or anyone else.” 

Image
A U.S.-supplied F-16 military fighter jet sporting Romanian Air Force markings participates in a NATO air operation in Lithuanian air space on May 22, 2023. [Source: peoplesworld.org]

When the rest of the world is trying to cool tensions, the NATO alliance continues to follow the script of imperial expansion with victims of the war not high on its list of priorities. Wojcik quoted the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Amy Gutmann:  

“We will show beyond a shadow of a doubt the ability and swiftness of our allied force in NATO as a first responder. I would be pretty surprised if any world leader was not taking note of what this shows in terms of the spirit of this alliance, which means the strength of this alliance.” 

Gutmann shows more proof that peace is not a priority for the alliance, despite reassurances from U.S. officials that the U.S. supposedly prioritizes an avoidance of nuclear war. It is very odd, and cynical, that further fueling the Russia-Ukraine war is at the same time a way to avoid nuclear war. Quite the contrary. 

Another imperial shill from the U.S., Secretary of the Army Christine Wormuth, said on TV, and Wojcik quoted, that it is “clear to the world that the U.S. military is the fiercest and most powerful in the world with a capability of dealing lethal blows that is greater than anyone else’s lethality.” Bragging about your military might while ignoring a chance for peace? Wormuth also made no mention of the victims of the war, Ukrainian and Russian. 

Image
Christine Wormuth [Source: defensedaily.com]

Not everyone was exactly happy about the war games (or war provocations) in Germany. Germans came out to protest the military exercises. Editors of the People’s Dispatch wrote the following:  

“On June 10, hundreds of activists from various anti-imperialist and anti-war groups as well as the Communist Party of Germany (DKP) marched to the Wunstorf Air Base near Hanover to protest the NATO’s Air Defender exercise scheduled June 12-23. A vigil was also held at the Spangdahlem Air Base near Trier, which will also serve as a base for the exercise. Die Linke [a Leftist party] organized protests against the NATO exercise on June 11.”  

The protests condemned the U.S./NATO alliance’s hunger for war. In particular, NATO was condemned for its belligerence. There were calls for a cease-fire and negotiations between Russia and Ukraine and the removal of the U.S.’s nuclear weapons from Germany. 

Image
Anti-NATO protests in Germany. [Source: mronline.org]

In European countries, overall, many are not glorifying the war and its escalation. Quite the contrary, most are not happy about the conflict. It has affected millions of people who are struggling to cope with inflation and an energy crisis, the latter of which was brought on by sanctions on cheap Russian oil. There has been an increase in military spending at the expense of cutting social programs. 

Quoting from the People’s Dispatch on Die Linke’s statement of June 12 about the provocations and the fueling of the war: “This military saber rattling is irresponsible! We will not adapt to war and the military as tools of foreign policy.” 

There have been assurances from the West, for example, by the media, that NATO could play a progressive and democratic role in the world. Further, there have been progressives and members on the left who seemingly glorify NATO and the prospects of it playing a positive role. This is prompted by the Russia-Ukraine war, where NATO may be viewed as a “liberating” force to aid Ukraine.  

But not according to Josefina Martinez and Diego Lotito, writing in Left Voice: “NATO is an imperialist war machine at the service of U.S. and European expansionism. In our time we will undoubtedly see increasing confrontations between world powers, as shown by the war in Ukraine.”

Image
[Source: publicdomainfiles.com]

What is the purpose of NATO, specifically? Established in 1949, its original function was to provide security for its member countries in Western Europe in case of Soviet expansionism.

In reality, the Soviets were never really expansionist, seeking only a security buffer in Eastern Europe to prevent renewed Western aggression against them. The communist leaders felt that social revolution would occur organically in countries around the world and not through foreign military conquest.

NATO’s original members were Belgium, Britain, Canada, Denmark, France, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and the United States. Years later in 1952, Greece and Turkey were admitted, eventually followed by West Germany (1955) and Spain (1982). 

Image
Harry Truman marking the establishment of NATO in 1949. [Source: bbc.com]

The Warsaw Pact was established by the Communist Bloc in 1955 to counter the existence of NATO. Its original members were Albania, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, East Germany, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Soviet Union. In 1989 and 1990, the Communist Bloc dissolved and, in turn, so did the Warsaw Pact. 

Now, there are 31 members in NATO, with former socialist countries having joined beginning in the late 1990s. 

With the Warsaw Pact dissolved, it would have made sense for NATO to dissolve; if one is talking about mutual agreements and being ethical about it. In February 1990, James Baker, Secretary of State in George H.W. Bush’s administration, promised Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would expand “not one inch” toward the east. This was based on an agreement that Germany would be reunified.

But the Bush administration contradicted Baker’s promise. Bush retorted: “To hell with that!” Additionally, it is said that Bush told German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, “We prevailed, they didn’t. We can’t let the Soviets snatch victory from the jaws of defeat.”  So, based on a lie, NATO expanded right to Russia’s borders. Given that the West, especially the United States, has a historical pattern of breaking promises and agreements, one could say that Gorbachev should have known better, instead of being naïve. 

Image
James Baker with Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev in Moscow in February 1990. [Source: nsarchive.gwu.edu]

Quoting from Solidarity magazine, in a piece written by Adam Adelpour, Mircea Geoana, NATO Deputy Secretary General, said in June 2022 that “NATO is a defensive alliance whose primary responsibility is to protect one billion citizens in Europe and North America. And “NATO exists to deter any aggression, defend our people, our democratic values, prevent conflict, and allow people to have ideas, to prosper and to fulfill their lives and their dreams.” Compared to this rhetoric, Adelpour wrote, “NATO’s history shows this couldn’t be further from the truth.” 

Image
Adam Adelpour [Source: theunshackled.net]

Adelpour then provides examples of NATO’s imperial debacles:

“NATO was anything but democratic. It included the Portuguese Salazar dictatorship amongst its first 12 members.  

Image
Greek Colonels who led 1967 coup d’etat. They were welcomed by NATO too. [Source: wikipedia.org]

“France waged bloody wars to defend its colonial empire in Algeria and Indochina while it was a NATO member, with U.S. backing.” 

Adelpour continued, citing “out of area operations” by NATO when it bombed Yugoslavia, particularly an 11-week bombing campaign against Serbia. According to Martinez and Lotito, writing in Left Voice, “Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro were bombed by 600 planes from thirteen countries, resulting in the deaths of 2,500 to 5,700 civilians with thousands of others injured, and tremendous material and environmental damage caused by the use of uranium bombs.”  

Adelpour wrote that “NATO’s foreign intervention reached new heights when it began running the occupation of Afghanistan after the earlier U.S. invasion.” The 20-year war “killed tens of thousands” with the country in tatters and the retaking of power by the fanatical Taliban. 

Emphasizing the obvious due to attacking other countries, Adelpour wrote that “NATO is not ‘defensive’ or ‘democratic.’ NATO is a U.S.-dominated, imperialist alliance willing to carry out overseas invasions.”

Image
[Source: crimetv.ro]

Adelpour added that NATO expansion eastward inevitably led to war. It heavily armed Ukraine and pushed for NATO membership for the war-torn country. And Ukrainian President Zelensky has gone along with it. But what is the real reason for it? Perhaps Zelensky has been threatened by Ukrainian Nazis; and has been pushed by the U.S./NATO alliance to continue the war. Or perhaps not. 

Another imperial intervention by NATO was in Libya. This started in March 2011, with the United Nations Security Council approving the action with 10 nations in favor and five abstaining. But the Security Council’s intent was to have an immediate cease-fire between Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and his forces vs. opposition forces, with Islamic fanatics taking over the latter.  

A no-fly zone was imposed in Libyan air space, and the tightening of sanctions against Gaddafi’s government. Then, there was the inevitable bombing of Libya by NATO forces. The U.S. and Britain fired more than 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles with their respective navies; plus, the imposition of a naval blockade. The French Air Force, the British Royal Air Force, and the Royal Canadian Air Force conducted sorties across Libya. No NATO ground forces were employed in Libya. 

Image
[Source: amervets.com]

There was a disagreement on the number of civilians killed in Libya. According to the Libyan government and media, more than 3,000 civilians were killed. NATO denied most of the killings. The UN Human Rights Council claimed in a report that only 60 civilians were killed by NATO bombing. The Council concluded that the bombing campaign was “precise” and there was an effort to avoid civilian casualties. So, 3,000 killed vs. 60 killed. Considering NATO’s handiwork in other actions, the latter figure sounds suspect. 

Image
More great handiwork from NATO—in Libya. [Source: washingtonpost.com]

There was worldwide criticism of NATO’s intervention. It was asserted that NATO’s objective was not humanitarian, but a way to exploit Libya’s vast resources. Among the international leaders who spoke out were Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, South African President Jacob Zuma, Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe, Raul Castro’s government in Cuba, Daniel Ortega’s government in Nicaragua, etc. 

There was little sympathy in the West for Gaddafi. For example, Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State in the Obama administration, boasted, “We came, we saw, he died.” She then laughed about it. Pretty damn cruel. But Clinton is an imperialist. 

Image
Clinton gloating like a schoolgirl after Gaddafi’s death. [Source: commondreams.org]

Regardless of assurances from NATO members, the real reasons for NATO’s belligerence are hardly mentioned, but there are exceptions.

For example, Adelpour wrote in Solidarity that former Bill Clinton adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski revealed the goals of U.S. policy in relation to NATO: This is “to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence amongst the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected and to keep the barbarians from coming together.” Brzezinski was referring to Russia and China as “barbarians.” 

Image
Zbigniew Brzezinski explained what NATO is really about. [Source: sputniknews.com]

The U.S./NATO alliance seems to be particularly fixated on China. Adelpour: “In a NATO strategy paper published in June [2022], China is mentioned more than Russia—over 180 times. 

“The U.S. is using the war in Ukraine to make an example of Russia and demonstrate its willingness to use military force to threaten China.” 

NATO’s hypocrisy showed through its “moral” rhetoric when it condemned Russian President Vladimir Putin of asserting “dangerous” rhetoric when he announced that Russia will station tactical nuclear weapons in neighboring Belarus. While this sounds crazy, how many nuclear-capable weapons does the U.S./NATO alliance have in other countries, like in Western Europe, and in Eastern Europe (Support for Nuclear Operations With Conventional Air Tactics program)? How about in Ukraine itself?

No one is totally innocent with respect to the Russia-Ukraine war. Certainly, the U.S./NATO alliance is not. Further, with the Warsaw Pact gone, it is time for NATO to also dissolve. NATO has got to go. 

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/0 ... abolished/

******

Tuesday, August 1, 2023
No Shit!
Thanks to Scott Ritter who posted the screenshot of Politico in his UTube channel. Here is the Captain Obvious piece No breakthrough yet in Ukraine’s counteroffensive from this rag:


If Ukraine’s supporters were hoping for a breakthrough after Kyiv’s forces made a new push in the southeast of the country last week, they were sorely disappointed. The latest attack, which saw Ukraine throw in thousands of Western-trained reinforcements to drive south from the town of Orikhiv, has not yet yielded significant results, U.S. Defense Department officials told NatSec Daily this week, with one noting that the gains are being measured in the hundreds of meters. Ukraine now has 150,000 troops committed to the operation across three axes of attack, including multiple Western-trained brigades, said one of the DOD officials, who like others interviewed for this newsletter was granted anonymity to discuss operational details. But Kyiv is still keeping a number of forces in reserve, as soldiers continue probing heavily mined Russian defenses for weak spots. “They are making mostly small, incremental gains” on all three axes, the official said. “They are still facing stiff Russian resistance — second and third layers of defenses.” Pentagon spokesperson Brig. Gen. PATRICK RYDER referred questions about the counteroffensive to the Ukrainian military, but noted that “it has and will continue to be a tough fight for them.”

Well, somebody needs to give US MSM and many Pentagon officials a basic course in military history and a brief review of operations as reflected in Russia's field manuals and operational documents, the ones which are available to public. It might help, including the understanding of why all those Air-Land Battle(s) by Pentagon are fiction and exercise in operational and strategic wet-dreaming.

I also have news for Politico and their "journos", when they report this:

Ukrainian forces are eagerly awaiting the arrival of the U.S. Army’s M1 Abrams main battle tank, which is expected as soon as early September and will help punch through Russia’s defensive lines. But as the operation grinds on, DOD officials expect the counteroffensive will last at least through the fall and possibly into the winter.

Shh, don't tell anybody, but Russians are also eagerly awaiting the appearance of the US Army's M1 Abrams MBTs and have been quite disappointed when learned that those Abrams will arrive without advanced electronics and active defense. I know, I know--they need another excuse the moment those M1s will begin to burn after meeting T-90M, PTRK Kornet or Krasnopol smart munition, or those nasty Mi-28s and Ka-52s, and that is when this excuse will be used: you see, we sent them inferior models. This is how the excuse will sound, word for word. But give British the credit where the credit is due--they first developed and procured (in Ukraine) completely Stealth MBT Challenger. It is so stealthy in visual diapason that no one have seen it on the battlefield so far. They are there, but not visible. That's what I am talking about--technology of the future.

But when Politico publishes that:

Ukraine’s plan if Russia assassinates Zelenskyy. A Russian assassination would deprive Ukraine’s war effort of one of its most valuable assets.

Ze, run, run like hell, because THEY, not Russians, will kill you and throw your body away as a used condom, if your body will be found at all. Run, run... to Russia--the only place where there is no death penalty, so far, and where you have all chances to stay alive and even have three square hot meals (wait, does evening tea count as a meal?) and Russian prisons are great places for beating drug addictions--doesn't matter if you are a murderer, a serial rapist or, like in your case--war criminal. Run Ze, run! You are a used condom and Globalists need a martyr. No, not Greta Thunberg, but you fit all criteria perfectly. Do you want to die for 404 "Democracy"?
Posted by smoothiex12 at 8:03 PM

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/

******

RUSSIAN GAS CONTINUES TO FLOW INTO SPAIN (AND EUROPE)
1 Aug 2023 , 11:57 am .

Image
Gas industry in Spain (Photo: Dwayne Senior / Bloomberg)

A report from the Ministry for the Energy Transition and the Demographic Challenge of Spain records that last May the main suppliers of natural gas to that country were:

1.Algeria with a share of 28.4%.
2.Russia with 27.9%.
3.Nigeria with 19.6%.

In the same month, Bloomberg published that Russian gas imports from Spain increased 84% from the start of the Ukrainian crisis to February of this year. Algeria, the traditional supplier of such hydrocarbons to the Iberian country, joins this crossroads with the suspension of the Treaty of Friendship and Goodwill in June 2022.

However, according to previous data and statements by the Algerian authorities, their country has complied with the gas contracts with Spain .

Despite the imposition of "sanctions" on the Russian gas industry, Spain is now the main buyer of gas from that source. Although, at the beginning of July, the Minister for the Ecological Transition of Spain, Teresa Ribera, admitted that the Spanish government continues to buy the resource from Russia because "there is no standard, neither European nor national, that expressly prohibits it because there are no limitations to that import".

The minister justified how the Spanish government feigned insanity at convenience with the aforementioned acquisition: "We live in a country where the rule of law and the rules sometimes present us with circumstances that are not our favorites."

On the other hand, Ribera called on European trading companies to look for " alternative channels " for Russian gas.

The Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA, for its acronym in English) pointed out that Spain currently re-exports the gas it imports , and the largest buyers are Italy, through shipments of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), and France, through through the VIP Pirineos gas pipeline.

In short, Russian hydrocarbons, through outsourcing, continue to reach the member countries of the European Union (EU).

Image
Gas imports from Spain (Photo: CORES)

In this case, according to data from Gas Infrastructure Europe , Spain is one of the largest holders of LNG storage capacity and has one of the best infrastructures for regasification in the EU and the United Kingdom.

However, the impediment so far is the interconnections with the rest of the European continent.

For this reason, with the different supply routes, including Cardón IV in Venezuela through Repsol's association with PDVSA, Spain has six large LNG terminals and an extensive gas network. In terms of energy security, the Kingdom could guarantee the supply to Europe in almost any situation, the key of which would be to maintain relations of respect or advantageous prudence with the countries that own the resource that it resells.

In this way, and leaving political blunders behind, the Spanish government could project the Kingdom as a probable hub for the distribution of gas for resale to the EU.

But each "foolishness" is part of the great business of energy sources under a "sanctions" regime: hydrocarbon prices decrease with respect to what the market marks with the excuse of the risks of "sanctionary" overcompliance; by purchasing such resources at reduced value, profit is made on resale. It is about the "European bachaqueo".

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/el ... a-y-europa

THE US COLLABORATED IN THE ATTACKS ON THE CRIMEAN BRIDGE
1 Aug 2023 , 4:06 pm .

Image
Explosion on the Crimean bridge in October 2022 (Photo: Reuters)

Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published a report last week claiming that US intelligence helped Ukrainians blow up the Kerch Bridge in the two bombings that have been carried out against the structure linking Russia to the mainland. from Crimea.

US government intelligence sources told the national security expert journalist that the July 17 attack was carried out in response to President Vladimir Putin's refusal to renew the Black Sea Grain Initiative agreement, under which a large amount of food produced in Ukraine should circulate.

"The drone was remotely guided and half submerged, like a torpedo," the source said, adding that the US strategy is that Zelensky can do whatever he wants without the "supervision of Moscow." adults", which is why he implied that there is no other plan than to resist the Russian attacks.

The anonymous official acknowledged that there was much more than grain and sunflower seeds coming into Europe from Odessa and other Black Sea ports: "Odessa's exports included illegal things like drugs and the oil Ukraine got from Russia."

https://misionverdad.com/eeuu-colaboro- ... -de-crimea

GoogleTranslator

******

The upcoming ‘peace conference’ in Jeddah: discussion on Press TV (Iran)
August 1, 2023

Once again I am appreciative of the news team at Press TV for an invitation to discuss the forthcoming peace conference in Jeddah on 5-6 August.

There has been very little mention of this conference in major media so far and there seems to be confusion at the Wall Street Journal, Al Jazeerah and other channels as to what the gathering can accomplish. It is not yet clear what kind of representation is to be expected from the more than 30 countries that have been invited.

What does seem clear is that the United States is the basic promoter of this gathering at which Jake Sullivan hopes to make a case for the Ukrainian peace plan to the Global South attendees. The only problem with this is that the Ukrainian plan is essentially a Russian capitulation: acceptance of full withdrawal from Ukrainian territory back to the 1991 boundaries, the placing of the Russian leadership before a court for its war crimes, the payment of reparations to Ukraine and the like. This is all the height of absurdity given the presently obvious fact that Kiev’s much heralded counter-offensive has been a failure and the country’s total defeat could come in the very near future.

See http://www.urmedium.net/c/presstv/125547

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2023/08/01/ ... s-tv-iran/

****

Recruitment of students with tuition debts for the war in Ukraine
August 1, 6:36 p.m

Image

Recruitment of American students with tuition debts for the war in Ukraine.
They replace it with "volunteer status", medical insurance, monthly payments.
The reason lies in the gradual exhaustion of cannon fodder in Ukraine. We need to import more from abroad.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8536471.html

Between 20,000 and 50,000 Ukrainians have lost one or more limbs since the start of the war
August 2, 8:53 am

Image

Between 20,000 and 50,000 Ukrainians have lost one or more limbs since the start of the war.

The Wall Street Journal writes about this, noting that these figures are comparable to the damage caused by the First World War.

The publication cites these data with reference to the Kyiv charitable organization Houp Foundation and the German manufacturer of prostheses Ottobock. The latter, in turn, rely on the data of the leadership of Ukraine and partner companies.

The article notes that the actual number of injured may be even higher, since the process of prosthetics takes a long time.

https://ctrana.news/news/441445-sravnim ... vojne.html - zinc

Taking into account how the losses are calculated for the dead and wounded, it must be assumed that the calculation of the disabled is carried out in the same vein, in the direction of maximum underestimation.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8537200.html

According to the grain deal
August 2, 2:48 p.m

Image

Under the grain deal.

1. Putin said that the implementation of the grain deal is meaningless without the implementation of the Russian part of the deal.
2. Russia is ready to discuss the implementation of the grain deal if Russian conditions are met. In this regard, the position of the Russian Federation does not change.
3. The West currently does not show any desire to comply with Russian conditions. None of them.
4. Turkey and the UN do not have the opportunity to influence the position of the West, even if the UN really would like to. Therefore, the grain deal died in its former form.
5. Erdogan and Putin agreed to continue discussing the parameters of the grain deal, including during Putin's expected visit to Turkey this August.
6. Attacks on the port infrastructure, which was previously protected by the grain deal, will continue, the Nazi regime cannot protect these objects, so the value of the remaining ports will decrease with more or less systematic strikes.
7. The most likely scenario is separate agreements between Russia and Turkey on a grain hub without Ukraine, with ongoing attacks on infrastructure on the Black Sea coast.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8538257.html

On the Polish-Belarusian border
August 2, 4:23 p.m

Image

On the Polish-Belarusian border, during the exercises of the Belarusian military with the Wagner PMC, 2 military transport helicopters flew 3 km into the territory of Poland. In Poland, there is a slight hysteria about this.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8538396.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 03, 2023 12:12 pm

strategic interests
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/03/2023

Image

Since the war began, Ukraine has had the invaluable support of its Western partners, which at every stage of the conflict has translated into economic, military, political and diplomatic assistance. That partnership was brewing even before the Maidan victory and has remained intact over the years despite kyiv's performance. Neither the United States nor its European partners, mainly Germany, withdrew their support from Ukraine with the start of the anti-terrorist operation., with which Kiev tried to end the protests in Donbass and which quickly escalated into open warfare in which thousands of people lost their lives in battles in the summer of 2014 and the winter of the following year. Ukraine was also not publicly reprimanded for building a dam to prevent the passage of water from the Dnieper to the Crimean channel, thus ruining agriculture in the black soil of the peninsula and making it difficult for Russia to supply the civilian population. An implicit approval of the collective punishment of the population can be understood in the Western silence.

In 2014, Ukraine also ceased payment of public salaries, pensions and social benefits in the territories under the control of the DPR and PRL. He did it first de facto , claiming that it was impossible to send the funds, and later de jure by decree of then President Petro Poroshenko. Despite the stabilization of the war, the points of the Minsk agreements that provided for the resumption of economic relations between Kiev, Donetsk and Lugansk and the supposed commitment of Ukraine to recover the banking system of Donbass, also interrupted in 2014, the pensioners They were forced to cross the front or depend on intermediaries -always in exchange for a high commission- to obtain their pensions. Even in those cases, payments could only be received if the person had registered as internally displaced. In practice, an important part of that population, possibly the most vulnerable of the war, was left with only the small pensions that the DPR and the RPL, with funds that came from Russia, established as of 2015. Despite numerous proposals over the years, including one from the Red Cross, which offered to act as an intermediary, both Poroshenko and Zelensky refused to change the situation. And aside from two mentions by the United Nations, both extremely polite and without raising their voices, reproaches against Ukraine for non-payment of the elderly population only came from Russia. Neither Germany, nor France, and certainly not the United States and the United Kingdom, have ever demanded that kyiv resume pension payments in Donbass.

Neither the non-payment of pensions, nor the cutting off of water to more than two million people, nor Ukraine's refusal to implement the peace agreement it had signed led to public criticism of Ukraine, which was always allowed, if not cheered, any excess against the civilian population of Donbass and against opposition politicians, activists, journalists and civilians. With the Russian invasion, that diplomatic and political, and to a lesser extent economic, support that the United States, the United Kingdom and the countries of the European Union had maintained turned into a massive increase in economic, financial and military assistance, which was added to even stronger political support. The symbiosis of shared interests has trembled slightly on only one occasion: the moment in which Ukraine tried to present the impact of a projectile from its anti-aircraft defense in Poland as an attack, not only Russian, but deliberate against a NATO member country. On that occasion, when the strategic objectives of kyiv and Washington (plus their European junior partners) no longer coincided, Zelensky was politely but firmly rebutted in a clear manner and without leaks or statements from anonymous officers . President Biden himself denied his Kiev ally confirming that there were no signs of the Russian attack with which Zelensky intended to activate Article V of the NATO charter on collective security. The Ukrainian government's attempt to directly involve its partners in the war was as evident as Washington's, and even Poland's, refusal to play along.

Solved that episode by simply turning the page, not even the growing certainty that Ukraine is the main suspect in having blown up the Nord Stream pipes and Nord Stream-2 has managed to separate the allies. Even in that case, the common interest in staying united in their common war against Russia has prevented the relationship from suffering. It has basically done so at the cost of the complicit silence of Germany, one of the main parties affected. What happened with the Nord Stream shows the difference between the tactical and the strategic aspect and also who is the dominant force that defines those interests on the part of Ukraine's allies. Germany's economic interests were not sufficiently important or determinative of the strategic situation to cause Ukraine to lose support.

Something similar happened last month as a result of Volodymyr Zelensky's reaction when he realized that his country would not receive from NATO the invitation to immediately join the Alliance for which he had pushed so hard for months. The verbal excesses of its Kiev ally came close, if the Western press is to be believed, of modifying the terms of the final communiqué to further lower the limited promises that Ukraine obtained at the summit. The anger of Western countries at the lack of gratitude from Ukraine, which despite the constant flow of arms and funding that allows it to continue fighting, always demands more, was evident in the statements of the UK Defense Minister and is now being picked up by American media such as CNBC. The article, which focuses on the differences of opinion that have occurred in recent months, coincides with a moment of stagnation for the Ukrainian troops in their offensive on the southern front. Unable to quickly achieve what they had presented as inevitable - breaking through the Russian front and advancing on Melitopol - Ukraine finds itself under pressure from the West, which is simply becoming anxious that the expectations that the Ukrainian government itself had created are not being met.

In recent months, differences of opinion have been clear at various times, for example in the battle for Artyomovsk, a city the US made clear it did not consider strategic and not worth losing personnel, weapons and ammunition for. . This reproach of wasting precious resources donated by its suppliers simply because of the symbolism created by the propaganda, which was already made clear during the battle, is now repeated in each of the articles that mention the disparities of opinion between Kiev and Washington. Citing an anonymous source, CNBC He also adds that “the United States has actively recommended Ukraine not to do certain things, but kyiv does them anyway, brushing aside or ignoring the concerns of the United States. And they come to the United States, or to Washington or to the Biden administration, complaining that they are not included in the NATO talks. Complaints about Ukraine's lack of gratitude to those who are financing its war seem apparent, as does disagreement on certain aspects of the war.

However, neither the disagreements nor the statements should be considered as a sign of distance between kyiv and its partners, whose interests continue to be aligned. Differences in the tactical aspect - the possibility of attacking targets in Russia, the direction of the offensive or the insistence on returning to fight for Artyomovsk - exist, but they do not affect the strategic objective that Kiev and Washington share. Only in case of disagreement at that level could we see a real distancing from the United States and a decline in the assistance that NATO countries provide to Ukraine. Still, and even despite the hero image that the Western propaganda machine has created for Zelensky, the West has hinted this week that Ukraine's current president is not essential. This is how the article published byPolítico , a medium very close to the Biden administration, in which contingency plans are discussed in the event of the president's assassination or death. With a subtext that sounds like a warning that his presence is not essential, Politico 's sources assure that nothing would change and that a collective government possibly led by Andriy Ermak, right-hand man of the current president, would continue without changes. This will be the case as long as Washington's strategic goals remain common to kyiv's. In that time, any excess will be forgiven and any violation even of the red lines marked by their allies will be justified.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/03/inter ... more-27853

Google Translator

**********

US Cluster Munitions Will Bring More Pain and Death to Donbass Civilians
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 1, 2023
Eva Bartlett

Kiev will use its newly received weapons to target residential areas, just as it has for the past nine years

The recent US decision to send cluster munitions to Ukraine is immoral, unethical, and criminal. We’ve already seen the horrific results of the use of such weapons – civilians mutilated and murdered (often decades later) in Iraq and Southeast Asia, for example, and in Lebanon.

In addition to the ethical reasons not to send these weapons to Ukraine, there are pragmatic reasons why, from a military perspective. They are pointless for Ukraine, in spite of Western promises that they will “do more damage across a larger area than standard unitary artillery shells by releasing bomblets, or submunitions.”

In reality, while covering a wider area than a conventional high explosive munition, the cluster bomblets do not inflict more powerful damage, certainly not against Russian fortified positions. Their use is mainly for targeting troops in the open and lightly armoured vehicles. Not a game changer for Kiev.

According to former US Marine Corps intelligence officer Scott Ritter, “these are the worst weapon in the world for trench warfare. With trench warfare, you need a high explosive round that collapses bunkers, that collapses trenches.”

If the US knows that cluster munitions won’t change facts on the ground for Ukraine, why is it sending them? Because, as President Joe Biden himself has said, Ukraine is “running out of ammunition and we’re low on it.” So, the US might as well offload its old stock of cluster munitions. They will not, as Biden claimed, “stop those tanks from rolling.” Nor will they – as the Biden administration claims – “save civilian lives.” They will almost certainly be used to kill, maim, and terrorize more Donbass civilians immediately and for years to come.

US Colonel Douglas Macgregor has emphasized that the cluster munitions have a high dud rate. According to Ritter, close to 40% of them fail to explode. Macgregor also highlighted how children are “attracted to these bright shiny objects that look like baseballs,” so insidious is their design.

US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan assures us that Kiev will not misuse the clusters. He claims that “Ukraine is committed to post-conflict de-mining efforts to mitigate any potential harm to civilians,” and that “Ukraine has provided written assurances that it is going to use these in a very careful way that is aimed at minimizing any risk to civilians.”

The US never signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions – which prohibits all use, production, transfer, and stockpiling of cluster munitions – but didn’t mind virtue signalling its abhorrence of them when it lobbed accusations against Russia (also not a signatory of the convention) on February 28, 2022, with Biden’s then press secretary, Jen Psaki, calling the use of cluster munitions a potential “war crime.”

As usual, it’s a heinous war crime when a US enemy supposedly does it, but not when an ally – or the US itself – actually does. As for Ukraine’s feeble promises to not use the cluster munitions against civilians, it has already been doing so since 2014.

Ukraine’s history of cluster-bombing civilians

By way of a personally witnessed example, in late March 2022, I visited the site of a Ukrainian missile attack that earlier that month had killed 22 civilians and injured 33 more. Because the Ukrainian-fired Tochka-U missile was intercepted, not all of its 50 cassettes of cluster munitions inside exploded in the city streets. Otherwise, the bloodbath would have been much worse. Then, in April 2022, Ukrainian forces targeted a railway station in Kramatorsk, likewise firing a Tochka-U with a cluster munition, killing a reported 50 people. Western media predictably accused Russia of the war crime, although investigations showed the missile emanated from Ukrainian-held territory to the southwest.

But like most of Kiev’s war crimes against Donbass civilians, its use of cluster munitions didn’t start in 2022. Back in 2014, Human Rights Watch (HRW) reported on Ukrainian government forces’ use of cluster munitions in populated areas in Donetsk city. An October 2 attack on the centre of Donetsk that included the use of cluster munition rockets killed an employee of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

The New York Times likewise reported that on several occasions in October 2014, “the Ukrainian Army appears to have fired cluster munitions into the heart of Donetsk, unleashing a weapon banned in much of the world into a rebel-held city with a peacetime population of more than one million.” Citing physical evidence and interviews with witnesses and victims, the newspaper wrote there were “clear signs that cluster munitions had been fired from the direction of army-held territory.”

Ukrainian ‘petal mines’ continue to maim

But these aren’t the only clusters Ukraine has fired on Donbass civilians. In fact, over the course of last year, I documented the aftermath of Ukraine firing rockets containing cassettes of internationally-banned PFM-1 “petal” mines, over 300 of the mines per rocket.

Even with warning, these nefarious "petal"/"butterfly" mines dropped by Ukraine on Donetsk are hard to see & easy to miss.

Ukraine is committing war crimes against the civilians of the Donbass, and has been for 8+ years. pic.twitter.com/p5byG95GVG

— Eva Karene Bartlett (@EvaKBartlett) August 1, 2022

Due to their design, they generally glide to the ground without exploding, until someone or something steps on or otherwise disturbs them.


According to authorities in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR), Ukraine began firing these tiny, indiscriminate mines on March 6, 2022, during the battles for Mariupol, and then from May 18, 2022, into DPR and Kharkov Region settlements.


Since first documenting the aftermath of Ukraine’s use of the mines in central Donetsk in late July, 2022, I’ve interviewed victims, and reported on the painstaking work of Russian sappers to locate and destroy the mines. As of July 25 this year, 124 civilians have been injured by the mines, including ten children. Three civilians died as a result of their injuries.

Western weapons used to kill Donbass civilians

It should be mentioned that over the course of its now nine-year war against Donbass, Ukraine has been using conventional NATO munitions to slaughter and maim civilians. The high explosive shells Ukraine fires throughout Donbass cities and towns, but also countless times in the very heart of Donetsk, tear people apart, leaving mangled bodies and remains on streets and sidewalks, and in marketplaces.

On July 22, Ukrainian forces allegedly shelled Russian journalists in Zaporozhye Region with cluster munitions, killing one and injuring three others.

These deliberate attacks on the media, on civilians’ homes, hospitals, infrastructure, and on civilians themselves should be condemned as loudly as Ukraine’s firing of petal mines and of cluster munitions in general. But the US announcement that it would send cluster munitions to Ukraine resulted in some mild tutting from other Western nations, but no seriously strong condemnation. Canada is one of the nations voicing at least some objection to sending cluster bombs, the leadership in Ottawa probably feeling it ought to mildly protest, given Canada’s convention.

The Canadian government recently stated that it is fully against the use of cluster munitions and is “committed to putting an end to the effects cluster munitions have on civilians – particularly children.” Yet aside from polite grumblings regarding the US clusters, I’ve seen no Canadian condemnation of Ukraine’s repeated use of cluster munitions on the civilians of Donbass.

But the real criminals here are the US government, which knows sending its cluster munitions won’t actually help Ukraine fight the Russian military in any tangible way, but that it is highly likely Ukraine will instead use them against Donbass civilians. Apparently, that’s just fine with the crocodile-tear-crying US hypocrites.

If the US delivers cluster bombs to Ukraine, it is committing a war crime, as the UK has committed war crimes by delivering depleted uranium weapons that release radiation and cause cancers and birth defects.

— Alfred de Zayas (@Alfreddezayas) July 8, 2023

*Update:

RT: “Cluster Munitions Hit Passenger Bus in Makeevka-Yasinovataya (Donetsk People’s Republic) – the vehicle came under fire from Kiev’s forces – local authorities”

Eva Bartlett is a Canadian independent journalist. She has spent years on the ground covering conflict zones in the Middle East, especially in Syria and Palestine (where she lived for nearly four years). The writer is a recipient of the 2017 International Journalism Award for International Reporting, granted by the Mexican Journalists’ Press Club (founded in 1951), was the first recipient of the Serena Shim Award for Uncompromised Integrity in Journalism, and was short-listed in 2017 for the Martha Gellhorn Prize for Journalism. See her extended bio on her blog In Gaza. She tweets from @EvaKBartlett.


https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... civilians/

(For reasons unknown all the images from this piece were unavailable.)

*****

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 2, 2023
August 2, 2023
Rybar

Ukrainian formations do not abandon attempts to push through the defense of the RF Armed Forces in the Orekhovsky sector : at night, the enemy entered into battle with Russian military personnel, but was driven back. At the same time, the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine continues to pull additional forces to the site.

On the Kupyansky sector of the RF Armed Forces, they continue to advance: the servicemen started a battle with the enemy near Liman 1st and in the direction of Kalinovo , coming out of both clashes as winners.

The situation near Kleshcheevka and Berkhovka in the Soledar direction has somewhat stabilized . However, the Armed Forces of Ukraine launched several attacks at the Andreevka-Kurdyumovka line , occupying lines near the local cemetery. The enemy could not achieve significant successes.

Last night, Russian troops launched a series of attacks on the facilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Kiev and Izmail : in the latter, the port infrastructure used by the enemy to attack the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy and the Crimean peninsula was hit.

Image

Attacks of the Russian Armed Forces on the port infrastructure of Izmail

Image
Tonight, Russian troops launched a series of Geranium strikes on infrastructure in Izmail in the Odessa region . Most of the objects belonged to the port infrastructure of the city. Several targets were close to each other within a radius of one kilometer: the Izmail Marine Station, the administrative building of the Danube Shipping Company, an oil storage and a granary in the port, which is conveniently used for storing military products.

These strikes are likely to disrupt port infrastructure on the Danube and try to minimize the new attacks on the Black Sea Fleet that Ukrainians regularly launch from the mouth of the river. The port of Izmail, as well as other harbors on the Danube, are facilities where both surface and air drones of Ukrainian formations are now based, involved in attacks on the Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet.

It is noteworthy that at the time of the attack over the Romanian city of Tulcea , an American P-8A Poseidon anti-submarine patrol aircraft was operating nearby , which immediately after the strike went to the south of Romania .

Ukrainian attack on Guards

Image
At about 11:00 am, Ukrainian formations launched a missile attack on the Gvardeyskoye airfield north of Simferopol in the Crimea . According to preliminary data, an unidentified type of missile fell near the base, but objects on the territory were not affected.

An attempt to destroy an important military facility is not surprising. The Ukrainian Armed Forces have already carried out attacks on the airfield several times in recent weeks, and the NATO satellite constellation photographed the base more than 30 times in July. And in the Black Sea, the NATO E-3A AWACS aircraft is now operating.

For the strike, a converted S-200 ballistic missile or the Grom-2 OTRK could be used. However, a few days ago, the Ukrainian Armed Forces also used some new type of missiles / UAVs in the Razdolny area , so it is possible that they were involved in the attack on Gvardeyskoye.

The situation on the front line and the fighting
In addition to successful strikes against enemy targets in the Odessa region, the RF Armed Forces hit targets in Kiev . One of them was the building of the State Service for Special Communications and Information Protection of Ukraine.

Image
In the Starobelsky direction in the vicinity of Kupyansk, Russian troops continue their positional offensive. According to the interception of negotiations between members of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, separate reconnaissance groups of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are attacking the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the direction of Kalinovo .

South-west of Liman 1, Russian servicemen engaged in a shooting battle with 101 brigades of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces near the Oskol River. Ukrainian formations are trying to counterattack, but to no avail.

At the moment, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are preparing for a counterattack. At the training ground in Grushevka , the coordination of assault groups is urgently underway, and in the vicinity of Kupyansk, according to some reports, a unit of 115th Ombr 10th AC of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has arrived.

Image
In the Soledar direction near Bakhmut , the situation has somewhat stabilized compared to previous weeks. To the north and near Berkhovka there are no active battles, only periodic shelling of positions by artillery is noted.

At Kleshcheevka, after more than a month of clashes, the active phase turned into a positional one. The Ukrainian formations are restoring combat capability, the forces of the 24th Ombre, which participated in the "meat" assaults, were withdrawn for resupply.

Over the past day, the main attention was focused on the Andreevka-Kurdyumovka line , where assault detachments of the 22nd Ombre and Terodefense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine launched several attacks on Russian strongholds. The attack was preceded by massive artillery preparation by the brigade-artillery group of the 22nd brigade from the position area on the Belaya Gora-Dyleevka line . As a result, the enemy was able to take the lines near the cemetery near Kurdyumovka, but could not go further.


There are no significant changes on the front line in the Donetsk direction . The Ukrainian formations made several attempts to attack Russian positions in the Maryinka area , but after falling under artillery fire, they retreated without success.


Far Eastern fighters from the 127th Motor Rifle Division, under the cover of aviation, repelled another attack by an enemy armored group in the Vremievsky sector .

Due to the dense mining of the area, the enemy could not achieve the desired result, and having lost several armored vehicles and manpower, he was forced to retreat to his original lines.

Image
On the Orekhovsky sector, enemy infantry groups, supported by artillery, started a shooting battle with units of the Russian Army near Rabotino at night . The attack was repulsed, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine retreated back with losses. The Spetsnaz archangel reported that the UAF engineering vehicle attempted to make its way in landing, but was detected and destroyed by the Lancet drone. Earlier we mentioned that the forces of the 48th engineering brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine appeared on the front line.

In the vicinity of Pyatikhatki, an infantry detachment under the cover of a tank also tried to gain a foothold at the stronghold of the RF Armed Forces, but during the battle it was destroyed by the ATGM crew, and the remnants of the group retreated to the forest belt.

Despite some lull, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are preparing for a new attack. In a few days, one of the brigades of the 10th Army Corps of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was transferred to the Orekhov area in small columns. This was done as part of a disguise movement. The dispatch of the 10th AK unit to Orekhov, along with the relocation of the forward command post of the corps, indicates an imminent resumption of hostilities in the sector. However, the readiness of the forces is still in question: the other day, one of the battalions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was withdrawn for resupply due to colossal losses in manpower.

On the Kherson direction, the operators of theLancet UAV with a well-aimed hit hit the second launcher of the IRIS-T SLM air defense system this week. The hit had a clear hit on the roof of the engine compartment, so it can be assumed that the installation was at least, if not destroyed, then disabled.

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas

Image
During the day, Ukrainian formations fired at the border area of ​​the Kursk region . According to local residents, the villages of Elizavetovka were hit and Tetkino : there is no information about the wounded and injured.

Image
In the Belgorod region, the village of Vyazovoe was hit today . Shells have broken power lines, repair teams are carrying out restoration work. Local residents also reported shelling of Repyahovka .

Image
During the day, Ukrainian formations again conducted a massive shelling of the cities of the Donetsk People's Republic . In Donetsk , Petrovsky, Kirovsky and Kuibyshevsky districts were hit, where a 90-year-old woman was injured. In the Nikitovsky district of Gorlovka , a teenager and a young girl were wounded, they were provided with all the necessary medical assistance. In Yasinovataya, in the Lokomotiv garage cooperative, three men came under fire. In addition, the enemy struck at Staromikhaylovka and the village Zaitsevo near Gorlovka.

Image
In addition, the Armed Forces of Ukraine continued to strike on the left bank of the Kherson region . At least three dozen shells fired by the enemy on civilian infrastructure Novaya Kakhovka, Solontsev, Krynok and Kakhovka : there were no victims or injured.

Political events
On the armament of the Russian territorial self-defense in the border regions of the Russian Federation

The creation of a normal territorial self-defense in the border areas has nevertheless moved off the ground: this afternoon the governors of the Belgorod and Kursk regions reported that the combatants received military weapons for the first time.

According to the heads of the regions, after several months of work, a mechanism was found to provide them to the detachments, which is fully consistent with the current legislation. Details are not yet known, although the statements of Roman Starovoit it can be assumed that weapons will be centrally stored in special places.

However, it later turned out that the self-defense fighters were given Saiga-MK carbines , and not automatic weapons, as was originally supposed. On the one hand, the task of the militias is not to fight with battalions of tanks and infantry, but to pin down the DRG in battle or even fight individual saboteurs: in such conditions, even a civilian rifled carbine can be an argument. However, it is not clear why then it is necessary to centrally store them under lock and key.

And yet, with automatic weapons, territorial self-defense will be much more effective. And the fact that they cannot give her machine guns is a consequence of the lack of a legislative framework and the status of militias. The governors are acting as best they can in order to somehow supply the fighters. Without a principled decision from above, one will have to limit oneself to half-measures, which will not properly affect security in the border zone.

On the transfer of USAID drones to the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) donated nine autonomous Skydio 2+ drones to the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine . The drones are equipped with 4K cameras, which are said to be used for photo and video recording to "capture more than 115,000 cases of destruction of civilian infrastructure and evidence of human rights violations by the Russian Federation." Evidence will be collected by two Ukrainian human rights organizations supported by USAID.

Skydio UAVs are not new equipment for Ukrainians: previously, drones were actively used for mapping the territory in order to compare it with geospatial intelligence data. In addition, the US military is currently working on equipping Skydio with anti-tank grenades, which will allow them to be used as an alternative to expensive anti-tank systems.

Participation of Turkish militants in the fighting in Ukraine

Recently, a new detachment of Turkish-speaking citizens arrived in the Chernihiv region as part of the strengthening of the group near the Russian borders. It is difficult to say about their numbers, because in this case one should not forget about the usual PR, as was the case with the virtual battalion "Turan".

Considering that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are already armed with not only Bayraktars (some of them are controlled by the Turks), but also other types of MLRG and T-122 MLRS, the presence of the Turks can be associated both with training and participation in hostilities in as advisers and combatants.

" Ladyboy" in the service of the Ukrainian army

The most " main " transgender in Ukraine , Sarah ( Michael) Chirillo , according to local publications, has become the official speaker of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, where he will be engaged in the " fight against Russian propaganda " .

It is not yet known for certain whether this information is true, since Sarah Michael herself did not comment on the situation. However, there is nothing surprising in such an appointment: in the desire to please European and American partners, the media personality is perfect for promoting Western “values” among Ukrainians.

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

As per that last item, Russian propaganda I suspect. Can't imagine the Nazis being cool with that...

******

In tit for tat, Ukraine and Russia launch drone attacks
Updated: 2023-08-03 07:21

Image
This handout photograph released by Ukrainian Emergency Service on August 2, 2023 shows a view of a damaged building at a Ukrainian port on the Danube after a night drone attack in Odesa region. [Photo/Agencies]

MOSCOW/KYIV — More than 10 Russian drones were downed during an overnight attack on Kyiv, Ukrainian officials said early on Wednesday, a day after Russia said it downed a wave of Ukrainian drones targeting Moscow.

"Groups of drones entered Kyiv simultaneously from several directions," said Serhii Popko, head of the Kyiv city military administration. "However, all air targets, more than 10 unmanned aerial vehicles, were detected and destroyed in time by the forces and means of air defense."

The attacks came one day after Russia said it downed a wave of Ukrainian drones targeting Moscow, Crimea and vessels in the Black Sea, as a skyscraper in the capital's financial district was struck for the second time in days.

"Two Ukrainian (unmanned aerial vehicles) were destroyed by air defense systems over the territory of Odintsovo and Naro-Fominsk districts of Moscow region," the Russian Defense Ministry said.

Another drone was suppressed by electronic warfare and crashed on the territory of the Moscow City, the capital's high-rise business district, the ministry said.

Russian defenses downed drones in the same district on Sunday, with debris damaging two office towers.

On Monday, the Kremlin called the recent strikes on the Russian capital an "act of desperation" by Ukraine following setbacks on the battlefield.

In a separate incident, authorities in Crimea said a Ukrainian drone was shot down over the peninsula. Russia's Defense Ministry said on Tuesday it also foiled a Ukrainian drone attack targeting patrol boats in the Black Sea.

Envoys summoned

In the latest development on grain imports, Poland and Ukraine on Tuesday summoned each other's envoys over an escalating row between the allies.

Polish presidential aide Marcin Przydacz said on Monday Warsaw was prioritizing "the interests of Polish farmers" when it called on the European Union to extend a ban on imports of Ukrainian grain.

Kyiv reacted by summoning Poland's ambassador to the Ukrainian foreign ministry on Tuesday.

"The statements about the alleged ingratitude of the Ukrainians ... do not reflect reality and as such are unacceptable," it said in a statement.

Poland reciprocated by summoning Ukraine's envoy, Vasyl Zvarych, to the Foreign Ministry, but later said his deputy would be hosted on Wednesday as Zvarych is in Kyiv.

Tensions between the neighbors grew as Poland opposed Ukrainian grain imports that had been triggering protests from local farmers.

http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/20230 ... 19fa1.html

******

As the Ukraine War Drags On, It’s Time to Reassess the Impacts of Sanctions
Posted on August 3, 2023 by Yves Smith

Yves here. I trust readers will look past the tired and demonstrably inaccurate Russia-denegrating-tropes-as-asides1 about the kinetic war, where Medhora has no expertise, to what amount to admissions against interest on the sanctions war.

By Rohinton Medhora, Chair, Governing Board of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, Distinguished Fellow, The Centre for International Governance Innovation. Previously published by Barron’s and the Centre for International Governance Innovation. Cross posted from the Institute for New Economic Thinking website

The conflict in Ukraine, which passed its 500-day mark in early July, has been described as “the first TikTok war” and a “living lab for AI warfare.” Modern tactics such as the use of advanced drones and hypersonic missiles have commingled with more traditional forms of battle such as trench warfare and old-school atrocities on civilians.


A similar mix of new and old also characterizes the sanctions regime the United States and others have imposed on Russia. Some sanctions, such as travel and trade restrictions on individuals, firms and goods, are part of the historical arsenal. Others are products of the digital age, as befits the war itself. But even traditional sanctions are affected by digital technologies, changing their speed and their effectiveness. Trade flows and travel of individuals are more easily monitored today than in the analog era.

The bundle of sanctions was initially designed and imposed in haste, with little basis to assess historic performance and no normative or long-term strategic frame to guide decision makers. A set of sanctions at the intersection of finance and digital technology stands out in this respect. The US-led coalition froze Russian central bank assets and made the Swift bank-messaging system off limits to Russia-linked users. Sanctions also targeted crypto transactions and assets.

About half of Russia’s $600 billion of official reserves held in US and EU financial institutions were frozen in mid-2022. There is no precedent for an action of this scale. The United States and the European Union weren’t themselves at war with Russia.

Swift, for its part, is a private company but also essentially a global public good. It helps to ensure a well-functioning, clean and comprehensive payments system. But that system has been weaponized. Several consequences have followed, none of them desirable for the United States and its allies’ long-term strategic goals.

First, many countries that saw the global payments system as a joint endeavour now wonder about the circumstances in which it might be used against them. Consequently, buying into a US-EU-led global order has become less likely, as evidenced by the degree of international equivocation in what the United States and its allies still see as a black-and-white war. Second, the Swift sanctions have accelerated and made more likely the rise of competing systems, most likely led by China. Third, by disabling the ordinary day-to-day transactions of tens of millions of Russians (and Belarusians), the allies have alienated what remains of the Western-oriented middle class that would be the main constituency for liberalism in any future Russian state.

The inclusion of crypto-assets in financial sanctions is a necessary by-product of the current era, and it too raises broader issues. The case for greater control over private crypto-assets goes beyond sanctions between wartime adversaries. Authorities shouldn’t need the excuse of war to crack down on shady uses of crypto. But just as the Swift sanctions weakened the case for financial cooperation, the crypto sanction also complicates the efforts by central banks to introduce digital currencies. And adding to the Wild West atmosphere, the crypto tracing firm Chainalysis alleges an anonymous hacker has cornered Russian crypto-assets and diverted them to Ukrainian causes.

Several broader lessons may be drawn from the test drive of these next-generation sanctions.

First, despite their high-tech nature, they are still susceptible to low-tech problems — workarounds (that of course are more accessible to elites than to the average citizen) and the non-participation of key countries.

Second, high-tech sanctions evidently haven’t slowed the Russian war effort. It appears Russia’s own dysfunctional military operation, the murderous antics of the quasi-official Wagner Group and, not least, the bravery of the Ukrainian people have done plenty to turn an anticipated early victory into probable stalemate.

Third, and perhaps most troubling, there appears to be no move to create the intellectual and moral structure within which adversaries develop and apply sanctions. It is axiomatic that actions around war are developed because of experience with war. Conventions against the use of chemical weapons and bioweapons and to preserve cultural artifacts during war have arisen out of tragedy. Ad hoc action in these areas has been deemed not to be in the long-term global interest, often by combatants on all sides.

All isn’t fair in love and war, even in the face of aggression. What seems cheer-worthy in one context inevitably comes back to bite. The norms and rules during war evolve through experience and even dialogue among combatants.

The purpose of sanctions isn’t just punishment in the short term but also achieving the long-term goals of victory on the battlefield and, crucially, winning hearts and minds. It is in these respects that current techno-finance sanctions merit further reflection.

___

s1 It’s not just the “dysfunctional military operation” remark late on, but early remarks that either reflect ignorance or deliberate misinformation, such as implying that both sides have hypersonic missiles when only Russia’s program is advanced enough for them to be used regularly in combat.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/08 ... tions.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 03, 2023 6:00 pm

Ukrainian Nationalism: Russian Special Operation— Denazification of Ukraine
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 1, 2023
Vladimir G. Kiknadze

Image
Azov Battalion, March 11, 2022.

This paper presents the results of the analysis of relevant aspects of the history of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) in comparison with the policy of the Kiev regime in 2014-2022, using the secrets revealed with the beginning of demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine during the special military operation of the Armed Forces of Russia. These revelations have increased the amount of evidence that the destruction of Russia is the invariable strategic goal of radical Ukrainian nationalism—Ukronazism—throughout its history and in our times, along with the continuity of goals, ideological positions, anti-people policy and crimes of the Banderites and their modern followers. Attention is drawn to the fact that the OUN actively participated in Hitler’s atrocities against Russia and its people. Their leaders and many other Ukronazis were agents and executors of the will of Hitler’s special services, after the victory over fascism, and of special services of the USA and the West. Maidan usurpers of power under the control and with the participation of the United States and their NATO satellites robbed and destroyed Ukraine, turned it into an anti-Russian bridgehead of the United States and NATO and together with them crossed the red line in creating a military threat to the Russian Federation and preparing aggression against it. Russia has therefore taken measures adequate to this threat to protect its national security, to save the people of the Donbass from genocide and to free the fraternal people of Ukraine from neo-Nazism. The most significant common features of radical Ukrainian nationalism in the 1920s-1940s and 2014-2022 are identified. The main elements of the Russian leadership’s decisions to recognize the Lugansk People’s Republic, Donetsk People’s Republic and to conduct a special military operation in Ukraine are summarized. The necessity of the denazification of Ukraine, including the holding of an international military tribunal, is confirmed by numerous facts and the results of preliminary investigations, which have established the involvement of more than 220 persons in crimes against peace and security of humanity.

Introduction: Decision to Conduct a Special Operation. Its Goal and Objectives

On February 24, 2022, a special military operation of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in Ukraine (special operation) was launched to prevent further civilian casualties and a humanitarian catastrophe in the Donbass, to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine, to prevent Ukraine from becoming a nuclear power and, as a consequence, to protect the state interests and sovereignty of the Russian Federation.

The decision to carry out the special operation was preceded by the Resolution of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation No. 743-8 GD, unanimously adopted by the deputies of the State Duma on February 15, 2022.

The decision to conduct a special operation was preceded by the Resolution, unanimously adopted by the deputies of the State Duma on February 15, 2022, of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, No. 743-8 GD: ” “On the appeal of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation to the President of the Russian Federation, V.V. Putin, on the need to recognize the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic. The appeal noted:

Residents of Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine at the all-Ukrainian referendum on March 27, 1994 agreed to the federal-territorial structure of Ukraine and the consolidation of the Russian language as the state language of Ukraine, along with the Ukrainian language, and also supported the use of the Russian language in the territories of Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine, in the sphere of labor relations, office work, documentation, education, and scientific activities.

The new authorities of Ukraine, glorifying the fascists Bandera, Shukhevych and their followers, became intolerant of the historically established norms of life, as well as the will and religion of the inhabitants of these regions. The actions of the Ukrainian authorities forced residents of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine to initiate a referendum and vote, in May 2014, for the adoption of the Act of Self-Determination of the Donetsk People’s Republic (89%) and the Act of Self-Determination of the Luhansk People’s Republic (96%).

For eight years, residents of certain areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine lived under shelling of small- and large-caliber weapons. According to the United Nations, more than 10,000 people have died, more than 50,000 have been injured, more than 1.4 million people are internally displaced within Ukraine, and more than 2.5 million people have arrived en masse in the Russian Federation, seeking emergency asylum. The Ukrainian authorities had stopped paying pensions and social benefits to residents and had established a complete economic blockade of the population and enterprises of certain regions of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions of Ukraine. The actions of the Ukrainian authorities can be regarded as the genocide of their own people.

As it became known from the originals of secret cipher telegrams captured by Russian military personnel during the special operation, on January 22, 2022, the commander of the National Guard of Ukraine, Colonel-General Mykola Balan, ordered the heads of the northern Kiev, southern Odessa and western territorial departments of the National Guard of Ukraine to prepare one of the strike groups for offensive operations in the zone of the “Joint Forces Operation” (JFO) in the Donbass. All activities of combat coordination of the nationalists were ordered to be completed on February 28, 2022, in order to continue to carry out combat missions as part of the Ukrainian “Joint Forces Operation” in the Donbass.

By February 2022, Ukrainian forces multiplied the shelling of the Donbass with prohibited large-caliber artillery weapons. Against the background of false statements about the desire for peace, Kyiv had begun large-scale artillery preparations for an offensive by a strike group of troops pulled into eastern Ukraine, with the support of aviation and missile systems.

On February 21, the leaders of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) Denis Pushilin and Leonid Pasechnik addressed the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin with a request to recognize the republics:

Denis Pushilin, head of the DPR: “On behalf of the entire people of the DPR, we ask you to recognize the Donetsk People’s Republic as an independent, democratic, legal, social state. We also ask you to consider the possibility of concluding an agreement on friendship and cooperation between the DPR and the Russian Federation, providing for cooperation in the field of defense;”
Leonid Pasechnik, head of the LPR: “Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, in order to prevent the mass death of the civilian population of the republic, 300 thousand of whom are citizens of Russia, I ask you to recognize the sovereignty and independence of the Lugansk People’s Republic.”
On the same day, an unscheduled meeting of the Security Council of the Russian Federation was held in the Kremlin, under the leadership of the head of state, to discuss the appeal and the situation that had developed in the Donbass. Each gave his proposals to the President regarding the appeals of the leaders of the DPR and LPR to Russia, with a request to recognizing their sovereignty, and the resolution of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, calling on the head of state to recognize the independence and sovereignty of the DPR and LPR.

On February 21, the President of the Russian Federation signed Decrees No. 71 “On the Recognition of the Donetsk People’s Republic,” and No. 72 “On the Recognition of the Lugansk People’s Republic.”

On February 22, the State Duma adopted, the Federation Council approved, and the President of the Russian Federation signed and promulgated federal laws No. 15-FZ “On the ratification of the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance between the Russian Federation and the Donetsk People’s Republic,” and No. 16-FZ “On the ratification of the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance between the Russian Federation and the Lugansk People’s Republic.”

On the same day, the President of the Russian Federation submitted to the Federation Council a proposal to adopt a resolution of the Federation Council on consent to the use of the Armed Forces outside the territory of the Russian Federation. On February 22, the Federation Council adopted Decree of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation No. 35-SF “On the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation outside the territory of the Russian Federation.” The decision of the Federation Council was aimed at establishing peace, preventing the continuation of bloodshed and shelling of citizens.

All these acts were adopted in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and in compliance with the necessary procedures provided for the activities of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation.

On February 23, the Heads of the DPR (Denis Pushilin) and LPR (Leonid Pasechnik) appealed to the President of the Russian Federation, with a request to provide assistance in repelling aggression from the Armed Forces of Ukraine (APU), in order to avoid civilian casualties and prevent a humanitarian catastrophe in the Donbass. The appeals emphasized the following:

… at present, due to the aggravation of the situation and threats from Kyiv, the citizens of the republics are forced to leave their homes, their evacuation to Russia continues. In the context of ongoing military aggression by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the republics, the destruction of civilian and industrial infrastructure, schools, hospitals, kindergartens and, worst of all, the death of the civilian population, including children. The actions of the Kyiv regime testify to the unwillingness to stop the war in the Donbass;

Kyiv continues to build up its military presence on the line of contact, while receiving comprehensive support, including military support, from the United States and other Western states. The Kiev regime is focused on the forceful solution of the conflict.

Taking the above into account, the heads of the two republics, in connection with the current situation, as well as in order to prevent civilian casualties and a humanitarian catastrophe, on the basis of Articles 3 and 4 of the treaties of friendship, cooperation and mutual assistance between the Russian Federation and the republics, asked the President of Russia to assist in repelling the aggression of the armed forces and formations of Ukraine.

On February 24, in accordance with the decision of the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, V.V. Putin, the Russian Armed Forces launched a special military operation to protect the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics.

The President announced his decision in an address to the citizens of Russia on February 24 at 06:00 Moscow time:

Circumstances require us to take decisive and immediate action. The people’s republics of Donbass turned to Russia with a request for help.

In this regard, in accordance with Article 51 of Part 7 of the UN Charter, with the sanction of the Federation Council of Russia, and in pursuance of the treaties of friendship and mutual assistance, ratified by the Federal Assembly on February 22 this year with the Donetsk People’s Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic, I have decided to conduct a special military operation.

Its goal is to protect people who have been subjected to bullying and genocide by the Kyiv regime for eight years. And for this we will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, as well as bringing to justice those who have committed numerous murderous crimes against civilians, including citizens of the Russian Federation.

In doing so, our plans do not include the occupation of Ukrainian territories. We are not going to impose anything on anyone by force.

When making decisions, as reported by the Chief of the Main Operational Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Federation Armed Forces, First Deputy Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Federation Armed Forces, Colonel General Sergey F. Rudskoy, two possible courses of action were considered. The first, to confine ourselves to the territory of the DPR and LPR within the administrative borders of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions, which is enshrined in the constitutions of the republics. The first was to limit the territory of only the DNR and LNR within the administrative borders of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, which is enshrined in the constitutions of the republics. But at that time there was a high probability that the Ukrainian authorities would constantly support the group involved in the so-called joint forces operation. Therefore, the second option was chosen, providing for actions on the entire territory of Ukraine, with the implementation of measures to demilitarize and denazify it.

Ukrainian Nationalism: Origins, Essence and Content

How did nationalism develop so radically in Ukraine that the Russian army has to solve the task of its denazification? What are the essence, content and origins of nationalism in modern Ukraine?

First of all, let us define the concept of “nationalism.” In the West, it is widely used in the same sense as patriotism. And in Russia these concepts have different content. The patriotism of the multinational Russian people is traditionally combined with respect for the interests, culture and patriotic feelings of the peoples of other countries, and nationalism, especially in extreme, radical forms—chauvinism, fascism, Nazism is condemned as an ideology that opposes peoples and states to each other, sowing enmity and serving an aggressive policy. These features are inherent in radical Ukrainian nationalism. Under the slogans of self-determination and independence, Ukrainian radical nationalists, Ukronazis, throughout the history of their movement have pursued the goal of selling their native Ukraine to foreign colonizers in order to become a privileged collaborationist caste of overseers over their compatriots.

In the early 1930s, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) declared the goal of creating its own “self-styled” state. But realizing that these aspirations were impossible and unattainable, it limited its dreams to being the Ukrainian colony of Germany in the hope of serving the role of henchmen of future colonizers. For the sake of this the OUN fought against full-fledged Ukrainian statehood and for its replacement by the false tinsel of a puppet, self-styled “independence”—and against the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, a full-fledged Ukrainian state, equal among equals with the Soviet federation, and one of the founders of the USSR and the United Nations. And the OUN’s descendants sold for foreign money and cookies the independence of their native Ukraine, obtained with the help of Russia in 1991, together with the huge territories given to it by Russia during the time when both of them were in the United Federation. And the US with its NATO satellites bought Ukraine—along with the sellers—in order to fight against Russia and destroy it.

The roots of terror and genocide in Ukraine in the 21st century are in the ideology and bloody experience of Ukrainian nationalism. In 1900, the “ideologist of Ukrainian sovereign independence” Mykola I. Mikhnovsky, called “the forerunner of strong-willed Ukrainian nationalism,” in a speech, later published in Lvov as a program of the Revolutionary Ukrainian Party (RUP), in the pamphlet Independent Ukraine, proclaimed ultra-radical racist slogans:

One, the only, indivisible, free, independent Ukraine from the Carpathians to the Caucasus.
Everyone who is not for us throughout Ukraine is against us. Ukraine is for Ukrainians, and as long as at least one foreign enemy remains on our territory, we have no right to lay down our arms” [M. Míkhnovsʹkiy, Samostíyna Ukraí̈na. B/m, 2012. (in Ukrainian). p. 17, 18].
The most amazing maxim of this opus is the assertion that “God himself has become a stranger and does not know (in the original “is not able,” apparently, in the meaning “does not know how”—V.K.) the Ukrainian language.

Having created the Ukrainian People’s Party (UNP), even more radical than the RUP, Mikhnovsky published its “code”—”The Ten Commandments of the UNP.” Some of these later became the basis of the ideology of OUN Ukronazism:

One, united, indivisible from the Carpathians right up to the Caucasus, independent, free, democratic Ukraine;
All people are your brothers, but Muscovites, Poles, Hungarians, Romanians and Jews are the enemies of our people;
Ukraine is for Ukrainians. So, drive out the foreign oppressors from everywhere in Ukraine;”
Everywhere and always use the Ukrainian language. Let neither your wife nor your children defile your house with the language of foreign oppressors;
Do not take a wife from strangers, because your children will be your enemies. Do not be friends with the enemies of our people, because you give them strength and courage. Do not act (in the original Ukrainian—“do not mess around”—V.K.) together with our oppressors, for you will be a traitor.
Mikhnovsky’s RUP program was published in Lvov. There, as early as 1897, he established close contacts with pro-Ukrainian figures in Galicia. In Galicia, which was part of Austria-Hungary, the anti-Russian, Russophobic orientation of Ukrainian nationalism was formed. From there, the doctrine of aggressive Galician Ukrainianism began to be planted in Malorossiya, even before the emergence of Italian fascism and German Nazism, in their misanthropic, racist spirit, incited hatred. In 1912, the Ukrainian-language magazine Ukrainska Khata (Ukrainian House), published in Kiev, urged:

If you love Ukraine, you must sacrifice your love for other geographical areas. If you love your language, hate the language of your enemy… Know how to hate. If we are talking about Ukraine, we should operate with one word—hatred of its enemies… Revival of Ukraine is synonymous with hatred of your wife—a Muscovite, to one’s children—Katsaps, to one’s brothers and sisters—Katsaps, to one’s father and mother—Katsaps. To love Ukraine means to sacrifice your Katsap kin… If you love Ukraine, if you want it to be—be with it, do not be with its denial” [Ukraí̈nsʹka khata, 1912, No. 6 (in Ukrainian)].

The predecessor of the OUN, the Ukrainian Military (Army) Organization (UVO), founded in 1920 and headed by Yevhen M. Konovalets, responded to the Polish oppression of the indigenous population of Galicia with terror. The most notorious action was the unsuccessful assassination attempt of the chief of the Polish state Józef Pilsudski, on September 25, 1921 (V. Kruzhkov, “Ukrainskiy natsionalizm v Rossiyskoy imperii i na yeyo oblomkakh,”—”Ukrainian nationalism in the Russian Empire and its ruin,” in Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’ (9)2021).

Soon Konovalets established cooperation with the German intelligence, and the UVO began to receive money from the Germans for espionage against Poland. The headquarters of the UVO was located in Berlin. With the help of German money, the UVO unleashed terror and sabotage in Poland (explosions, attacks, robberies-expropriations, etc.) [Ukrainskiye natsionalisticheskiye organizatsii v gody Vtoroy mirovoy voyny. Dokumenty—Ukrainian nationalist organizations during the Second World War. V 2 (T. 1. M.: ROSSPEN, 2012), pp. 335, 776; 5].

According to one researcher, “The UVO, in which the OUN originated, was a criminal organization. In the criminal sense, this criminality consisted in terrorist murders. Politically, the crime of the UVO, and later of the OUN, was the usurpation of the representation of the entire Ukrainian people. Neither the UVO nor the OUN received such a mandate from the people… never in their activities received the support of the Ukrainian people” (OUN-UPA: mif i real’nost‘: “Ukrainstvo”—OUN-UPA: Myth and Reality: “Ukrainianness.” Chap. XVII., pp. 142, 143, 143, 143, and V.V. Polishchuk, Gor’kaya pravda. Prestupnost’ OUN-UPA—Bitter Truth. Crimes of the OUN-UPA (Kiev, 2011), pp. 142, 143).

With the establishment of the UVO in 1929, its intelligence service played the dual role of its intelligence and counterintelligence (I.K. Patrylyak, “Sluzhba bezpeky OUN(b),” Entsyklopediya istoriyi Ukrayiny—Security Service of the OUNb. Encyclopedia of the History of Ukraine. Vol. 9. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 2012, pp. 658-660). Separate from the UVO, the OUN created a control and intelligence reference office in 1932. In Western Ukraine, there was an intelligence branch in the regional executio (Latin “executio”: execution, executive body of the regional wire—the OUN governing body), and intelligence and communications services in the districts (S. Hrab, Sluzhba bezpeky Orhanizatsiyi ukrayinsʹkykh natsionalistiv—Security Service of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. Voyenna Istoriya, 2008, No. 5).

Some Ukrainian authors directly link the explosive growth of terror of the UVO-OUN in the early 1930s—more than 60 attempts and murders, hundreds of acts of sabotage, and dozens of robberies (“expropriations”)—to the formation of nationalist security structures )D. Vyedyenyeyev, V. Yehorov, Mech i tryzub. Notatky do istoriyi Sluzhby bezpeky Orhanizatsiyi ukrayinsʹkykh natsionalistivyu CH.1. “Z arkhiviv VUCHK, HPU, NKVD, K·HB”—Sword and Trident. Notes on the history of the Security Service of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. “Part 1. From the archives of the Vuchk, GPU, NKVD, KGB.” 2(4) 2000, pp. 485–503).

According to the conclusion of one of the researchers, “the UVO, in which the OUN was born, was a criminal organization.” In the criminal sense, the crimes consisted of terrorist murders. Neither the UVO nor the OUN received such mandates from the people; never in their activities did they receive support from the Ukrainian people” [6, pp. 142, 143].

With the creation of the UVO intelligence agency in 1929, the OUN played the dual role of its intelligence and counter-intelligence [7, p. 658-660]. They created a separate control-reconnaissance service in the OUN in 1932. In Western Ukraine, the regional executive (from the Latin “executio”—“the executive organ of the regional branch”—the governing body of the Ukrainian government) had intelligence services, and in the districts—intelligence and communications services.

Some Ukrainian authors directly link the explosive growth of UVO-OUN terror in the early 1930s with the establishment of the security structure of nationalists—more than 60 attempts and murders, hundreds of acts of sabotage, dozens of robberies (“expropriations”).

In 1932, the Galician national clerical newspaper Tsel (The Goal) murderously proclaimed:

Ukrainian nationalism must be prepared for all methods of struggle… not excluding mass physical extermination (annihilation), even if only at the cost of sacrificing millions of human existences (essences, lives) [Tsel’, April 17, 1932, 11, p. 6; V.I. Maslovsky, Z kym i proty koho voyuvaly ukrayinsʹki natsionalisty v roky Druhoyi svitovoyi viyny—With whom and against whom Ukrainian nationalists fought during the Second World War (M.: Slavyanskyy Dyaloh)].

The OUN “Military Doctrine of the Ukrainian Nationalists” of 1938 demanded:

Against the hostile element it is necessary to issue such cruelty… so that the tenth generation would be afraid to look in the direction of Ukraine.

In the future Ukrainian state, there must be a pure national composition… Poles, Russians and Jews must be destroyed.(“Arkhivy OUN: ukrainskiye natsionalisty stavili tsel’yu vyseleniye i unichtozheniye vsekh polyakov—”OUN archives: Ukrainian nationalists aimed to evict and destroy all Poles.” TASS. 01.12.2016)

In the spring of 1941, Bandera and Co. with the briefing, “Struggle and Activities of the OUN During the War,” specified the tasks of genocide and terror: to destroy “hostile” national minorities—”Moskals,” Poles, Jews. They demanded: “Our power must be terrible for its opponents, terrorize foreign enemies and their traitors… The Ukrainian ruler of his own land must from every rank, at every step be promoted.”

The section, “Organization of the Security Service,” listed the enemies of the OUN to be destroyed: “Moskals,” Jews,”outsiders, mainly various Asians, with whom Moscow is colonizing Ukraine, Poles in the western Ukrainian lands”. The Security Service was given “executive power… to destroy elements hostile to Ukraine… as well as… to control social and political life in general” (“OUN v 1941 rotsi.” Dokumenty. V 2-kh ch. CH. 1. Kyiv: Instytut ictopiyi Ukrayiny NAN Ukrayiny—”OUN in 1941.” Documents, in 2 parts. Part 1. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2006, pp. 102, 103, 129, 159).

Roman Y. Shukhevych, the SS Hauptsturmführer, and leader of the UPA and the OUN “on Ukrainian lands,” who was elevated to “hero” of the Banderized Ukraine (“Yushchenko awarded the title of Hero of Ukraine to Shukhevich, one of the UPA leaders,” RIA Novosti. 14.10.2007), demanded: “Not to intimidate, but to physically destroy! There is no need to be afraid that people will curse us for our cruelty. Let half of the 40 million Ukrainian population remain—there is nothing terrible in this” (“Kakiye geroi—takaya i derzhava” —”What heroes-such a power,” in Odna Rodina, 04.01.2016).

Ideology of Nationalism in the Service of the Kiev Regime in Modern Ukraine

The anti-Russian hysteria in Ukraine, which began in the years of perestroika, based on Bandera templates, along with the glorification of the OUN-UPA butchers, became the ideological justification for turning the Ukrainian regime into a puppet and anti-Russian tool of the United States and the West. It has intensified since 2004, when one of the leaders of the first Maidan, head of the “Batkivshchyna” party, people’s deputy of Ukraine (this is the constitutional name for the deputies of its Verkhovna Rada, hereinafter, Nardep), future Prime Minister of Ukraine (in 2005 and 2007-2010), Yulia V. Tymoshenko, demanded that the Donbass be with barbed wire and napalm poured on it (A. Moskval, “‘Molyashchemusya’ Poroshenko o nachale voyny v Donbasse”—“’Praying’ Poroshenko about the beginning of the war in Donbass,” in Odna Rodina, 01.06.2018). Back in 2014, she stated: “…it is necessary… to kill these bloody Katsaps together with their leader… so that, damn it, there is not even a scorched field left of this Russia! …it is necessary to shoot them with atomic weapons.”

In December 2014, MPs Yuriy M. Bereza, Andriy M. Levus, and Igor V. Mosiychuk justified the terrorist attack in Grozny and called for similar crimes in Russia with the help of the media (“SK RF vozbudil delo protiv trokh deputatov Verkhovnoy rady za prizyv k terrorizmu”—”Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation opened a case against three deputies of the Verkhovna Rada for calling for terrorism,” in TASS, 12/06/2014). Ex-prime minister Iryna D. Faryon made criminal (according to the forensic conclusion) calls “to destroy Russia as a state and Russians as a group of people on the basis of nationality,” to carry out genocide (“SKR reshil nakazat’ eks-deputata Rady Farion za prizyvy ‘unichtozhat Rossiyu’”—”TFR decided to punish the ex-deputy of the Rada Faryon for calls to ‘destroy Russia,’” in NTV, 08.07.2015). Tyahnybok’s neo-Banderite Svoboda also called for it:

No matter how qualitatively the Russian-speaking amorphous biomass of living stomachs lives—they will not start singing on October 14 (the date of the alleged formation of the UPA, and since 2014 the holiday, “Day of Defenders and Protectors of Ukraine,” which legalized the substitution of the concepts of “heroism” and “betrayal,” the abuse of the memory of the fallen in battles with fascism and the victims of the Banderites: “Gossovet Respubliki Krym prinyal zayavleniye v svyazi s situatsiyey na Ukraine”—”The State Council of the Republic of Crimea adopted a statement in connection with the situation in Ukraine,” in Sayt Gossoveta Respubliki Krym, 22.10.2014—V.K.).” “Oh, there’s a red viburnum in the meadow…” (since 1914, the song of Ukrainian Sich Sagittarius, which is also sung by the UPA: —V.K.), will not pass in torch procession on January 1 (Bandera’s birthday—V.K.). This herd should be liquidated, somewhere around 5-6 million individuals… For 45-million of Ukraine, the disappearance of 6 million will be imperceptible” (“Iz FB Marii Zakharovoy”—”From FB Maria Zakharova,” in Antimaydan, 19.03.2022).

On Maidan 2014 and afterward, neo-Banderites shouted: “Knife the Moskals!” They called for them to be hanged and made their own meme: “Slit Russians!” This was shouted by two-legged predators, with SS symbols, accompanied by shouts of “Sieg Heil!” and raising of hands in the Nazi salute, by children zombified by them. Oleksandr Turchynov, “Bloody pastor,” ex-speaker of the Verkhovna Rada, by whose decree the acting president began the genocide of the people of the Donbass, proclaimed:

We are ready to destroy the Russians wherever we can. It is necessary to beat Russians not only in Ukraine, but also beyond its borders—on the territory of Russia (“Byvshiy spiker Rady Turchinov prizval k genotsidu russkikh—Former speaker of the Rada Turchinov called for the genocide of Russians,” in Komsomol’skaya Pravda, 01.03.2022).

This position of the Ukronazis was declared even during the special operation, on the Ukrainian Channel24, by its employee Fakhrudin M. Sharafmal (“Operatsiya po zakhvatu natsistskogo prestupnika Adolfa Eykhmana (1960)”—”The operation to capture the Nazi criminal Adolf Eichmann (1960),” in RIA Novosti. 11.05.2020). Eloquently and literally, he quoted the words of the Nazi criminal, one of the organizers and executors of Hitler’s holocaust policy:

Eichmann said… to destroy a nation, it is necessary to destroy first of all children, because by killing their parents—children will grow up and will definitely take revenge. If you kill the children, they will never grow up and the nation will disappear (“V Ukraine net natsizma”—”There is no Nazism in Ukraine,” Pikabu).

And Sharafmal continued, flouting the Geneva (and other) conventions, that

when I get a chance to kill Russians, I will… observe the Adolf Eichmann doctrine and make sure that neither you nor your children will ever live on this earth…. you must realize that this is about victory for the Ukrainian people, not peace. We need victory. If that requires slaughtering all of your families, I will be one of the first to do it… And I hope that there will never be another nation like Russia and the Russians on this earth…. If Ukrainians have the opportunity … to crush, slaughter, kill, strangle the Muskalnaya, I hope that everyone will contribute and ‘mop’ at least one Muskal.

Note: Sharafmal threatened to destroy not Russians, but the nation itself—a set of citizens of one state with a common self-consciousness (identity). All citizens of Russia of all nationalities. (In Ukrainian, “Russians,” the nationality and “Russians,” citizens of Russia of all nationalities are referred to by one word – “Russians”). And it is possible to fulfill this threat only by massacres all over Russia. In fact, he called for a total terrorist war in Ukraine and Russia, desired by the United States. But Sharafmal did not go to the front himself. He “fought” on the air.

These incitements were condemned by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (“V UVKPCH OON osudili prizyv ukrainskogo zhurnalista k genotsidu russkikh,”—”UN OHCHR condemned Ukrainian journalist’s call for genocide of Russians, in RIA Novosti, 03/17/2022). The Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation opened a criminal case against Sharafmal on the grounds of the crimes stipulated by para. “b” part 2 of article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, “Incitement of hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity,” subparagraphs “a,” “c,” part 2 of article 354.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, “Rehabilitation of Nazism.” Ukrainian judiciary is obligated to judge Sharafmal’s incitement under the Criminal Code of Ukraine—Article 2582, “Public calls to commit a terrorist act” (up to five years of imprisonment) and under Article 442 “Genocide,” which provides for up tofive years of imprisonment for public calls for it (Criminal Code of Ukraine, effective from 03/16/2022). But it did not. It seems that justice has disappeared in the Bandarized Ukraine. Acts recognized as crimes by international law, laws of different countries, including Ukraine, have become unpunished demonstrations of “national opinion” (conscience).

It is important to note one more circumstance. The main striking force and organizer of terror, the participation of the Banderites in the fascist genocide of our people was Bandera’s inquisition—the Security Service (SB) of the OUN and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) banned in Russia. (The Ukrainian Insurgent Army, banned in Russia, was an anti-Soviet armed group of Ukrainian nationalists that operated mainly in Western Ukraine, from December 1941 to July 1943—created by Taras-Bulba Borovets. In 1943, the OUNb gangs merged into the UPAb, the Borovets UPA ceased to exist, its members joined the OUNm and UPAb gangs. From 1944-1949, the UPA committed acts of terrorism, sabotage. It was completely liquidated in the early 1950s). The brutal traditions of Bandera’s executioners are continued by their modern-day descendants in Ukraine. Back in 2015, the then head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) Valentyn O. Nalyvaichenko stated that the SBU should be reformed on the model of the Banderite inquisition: “it is important to take as a basis the traditions and approaches to the work of the Security Service of OUN-UPA” (A. Sidorchik, “Inkvizitsiya Bandery. Kak ‘Sluzhba bezpeki’ sozdavala ‘Ukrainu dlya ukraintsev,’”—”Bandera’s Inquisition. How the ‘Security Service’ created ‘Ukraine for Ukrainians,’” in Argumenty i fakty, 02.04.2015).

Tyahnybok of the far-right nationalist party, Svoboda argued:

The Security Service of Ukraine remains the only carrier of the Ukrainian state idea in the 21st century, a kind of link between its past and future. And, accordingly, the leadership of the nationalist movement should be formed primarily from officers of the security services, because there is no other personnel reserve (I. Matveyev, “SSHA i YES rukami VO «Svoboda» gotovyatsya unichtozhat’ russkikh na Ukraine,”—”The US and the EU are preparing to destroy the Russians in Ukraine with the hands of the VO ‘Svoboda,’” in Voyennoye obozreniye, 26.02.2014).

According to the assessment of the Belarusian analyst, the Banderization regime, starting with President Viktor A. Yushchenko, turned the SBU into the “Service of Ukraine’s Banderization” (N. Malishevsky, “Sluzhba banderizatsii Ukrainy”—“The Banderization Service of Ukraine,” in RIA Novosti. 12/01/2014), and with its atrocities in the Donbass has likened the Ukrainian security forces to the OUN and UPA, which were recognized by the Court of Peoples—the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal—as accomplices to the crimes of Hitler’s Germany, which according to Article 6 of the Statute of the Tribunal are responsible for them (Statute of the International Military Tribunal for the trial and punishment of the main war criminals of the European Axis). As the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation pointed out on November 17, 2014, in its decision to declare the UPA and four other Ukrainian organizations extremist and ban their activities in Russia, the Nuremberg Tribunal recognized the OUN and UPA as collaborators. (From the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, in case No. AKPI14-1292C of November 17, 2014: “…to recognize the Ukrainian organizations ‘Right Sector,’ ‘Ukrainian National Assembly – Ukrainian People’s Self-Defense’ (UNA-UNSO), ‘Ukrainian Insurgent Army’ (UPA), ‘Stepan Bandera’s Trident,’ and ‘Brotherhood’ as extremist and ban their activities on the territory of the Russian Federation.” See: Official website of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation).

Denazification of Ukraine

To compare the goals and deeds of Hitlerites and accomplices of their crimes—the OUN-UPA and usurpers of power of the Maidan-2014, organizers and participants in the genocide of the people of the Donbass, allow evidence collected by law enforcement and the civilian researchers (Obyknovennyy fashizm: voyennyye prestupleniya ukrainskikh silovikov (2014—2016)—Ordinary Fascism: War crimes of the Ukrainian security forces (2014-2016). Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole, 2016, p. 431), and the media. These are the documents from archives, investigations and courts.

A lawsuit on the facts of genocide of the population of the Donbass and other acts in Ukraine, based on copies of criminal case files handed over by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, has been considered by the European Court of Human Rights since July 2021.

“The nationalists who have seized power have unleashed a persecution, a real terror campaign against those who opposed their anti-constitutional actions… A wave of violence swept Ukrainian cities, including a series of high-profile and unpunished murders,” Russian President Vladimir V. Putin stated in an address on February 21, 2022. “One shudders at the memories of the terrible tragedy in Odessa, where peaceful protesters were brutally murdered, burned alive in the House of Trade Unions. The criminals who committed that atrocity have never been punished, and no one is even looking for them. But we know their names and we will do everything to punish them, find them and bring them to justice.”

By February 10, 2022, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiated 467 criminal cases, on the grounds of numerous crimes of the Maidan usurpers of power and their friends against dissenters, on the grounds of genocide of the population of the Donbass, killings and torture of its inhabitants by the agencies of the SBU, the Interior Ministry, the Ukrainian army and nationalist battalions (the Natzbat), which were of a large-scale and systemic nature (Obyknovennyy fashizm. Ukrainskiye voyennyye prestupleniya i narusheniya prav chelovek. 2017-2020—Ordinary Fascism. Ukrainian war crimes and human rights violations. 2017-2020. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 2020, p. 452). Thus, in 2014, a criminal case was opened on suspicion of crimes of the then head of the SBU, V.A. Nalyvaichenko. In April 2022, another criminal case was opened against Nalyvaichenko for calling for violence against the Russian military. 103 perpetrators were prosecuted in absentia. Among them are the former head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Arsen B. Avakov and the former governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region, Igor V. Kolomoisky. Former Deputy Interior Minister Anton Y. Gerashchenko, was sentenced to six years in prison in absentia. Criminal cases were investigated against ex-Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Oleksandr V. Turchinov, ex-ministers of defense Anatoliy S. Hrytsenko and Valeriy V. Heletey, and ex-Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Victor M. Muzhenko.

On March 18, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov explained the meaning of Ukraine’s denazification. In his opinion, it implies the abolition of not only laws that encourage Nazi ideology and practices, but also laws that discriminate against the Russian-speaking population.

As the course of the special operation confirmed, the strongholds of the Kyiv regime are nationalist units, such as Azov, Aidar, Right Sector and others recognized in Russia as terrorist organizations. In Mariupol alone, they had more than 7,000 militants who “fought” under the cover of civilians, using them as human shields. The Azov militants drove women and children out of basements, threatening them with weapons and directing them towards the advancing DNR units in order to impede the advance of the People’s Militia. This has become a common practice for them.

Russian investigators found out that the Azov unit is made up of people of different ages, education levels and life experiences. But they are united in their unwavering determination to kill innocent people. This is the essence of Azov nationalists. To understand this, it is enough to give a few examples. In early March, in Mariupol, Azov member, Sergei Mikhailenko, and his colleague with the call sign “Drone” were near a residential building. A passenger car with “Children” written in large letters was moving in their direction. Despite this, they opened fire on the car, killing the four family members in it, including a three-year-old child. Another example. Alexei Mozgovoy and his brother Yuri took positions in a five-story building in Mariupol. There were 15 civilians in the basement, among them a man suffering from a serious illness. The nationalist brothers, threatening to kill, forbade civilians to leave the basement, even to bring medicine to the sick man. As a result, the man died. And when civilians, having seen what had happened, wanted to leave the place, the Mozgovs started shooting at them—four more people died. And, unfortunately, there are many such examples.

The testimonies of civilians who came out of the blockaded settlements and of captured Ukrainian servicemen show that the Ukrainian armed forces’ ability to resist is based on fear of reprisals from neo-Nazis. Their representatives are embedded in all troop units.

On 30 March, Russian Education Minister Sergey Kravtsov said that more than 50 experts, teachers and historians had analyzed textbooks and teaching aids used by teachers and children in Ukraine. It turned out that whole pages of history were rewritten in them. All this was financed by foreign countries.

“We could see that this is deliberate work, fabricating a system that distorts historical truth. This is not only aggression and readiness for a military operation against our country, but also the zombification of teachers, schoolchildren—and often violently—against Russia. We will never allow history, geography to be distorted, the facts of the Great Patriotic War, our friendship with Ukraine and other countries. Our country is always open, has always helped brotherly nations, including Ukraine,” emphasized Sergey Kravtsov.

“History textbooks emphasize military topics. The education minister drew attention to the fact that the authors of the manuals emphasized that “modern Ukraine needs a compact mobile army in the conditions of aggression by the Russian Federation… History textbooks name Bandera and Shukhevych as heroes, which are thus cultivated. The children’s nationalist organization “Plast” has been revived—Bandera and Shukhevych were its members. In it, Nazism is directly elevated to an absolute,” said Kravtsov.

After the investigation, the textbooks were handed over to the museum of the “Russia—My History” park, where a corresponding section of the “Liberation” display will be created. Everyone will be able to familiarize themselves with the facts of the distortion of history and geography in Ukrainian educational materials.

On April 2, the Investigative Committee of Russia, continuing to investigate crimes committed by the Ukrainian military and nationalists against the civilian population of the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics, on the basis of the collected evidence, in addition to the earlier charges under Article 356 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (use of prohibited means and methods of warfare), brought charges in absentia against 22 high-ranking Ukrainian military officers for genocide of the civilian Russian-speaking population (Article 357 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) of Donbas.

In violation of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and other international legal instruments condemning genocide, Ukrainian military officers in leadership positions gave orders, and others followed them, to completely destroy a national group of Russian-speaking citizens living on the territory of the Lugansk and Donetsk People’s Republics.

For eight years, Ukrainian security forces have been shelling populated areas in the Donbass using Grad and Uragan multiple-launch rocket systems, cluster-headed unguided aerial missiles, Tochka-U tactical missiles and other types of heavy offensive weapons with indiscriminate effects. As a result, a large number of civilians were killed and injured and civilian infrastructure and life-supporting facilities were destroyed.

Among the Defendants

High-ranking Ukrainian military charged in absentia for genocide of the Russian-speaking population in the Donbass:

Ukrainian Defense Minister, Valeriy Geletey (from July 2014 to October 2014);
Ukrainian Defense Minister, Stepan Poltorak (from October 2014 to August 2019);
First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine, Ivan Rusnak (since September 2014);
Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine, Oleksandr Dublyan (from October 2015 to December 2016);
Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine, Igor Pavlovsky (from 2015 to 2019);
Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine, Oleg Shevchuk (from November 2016 to September 2019);
Viktor Muzhenko, chief of the AFU General Staff (from July 2014 to May 2019);
Commander of the 13th Army Corps of the AFU Ground Forces (subsequently First Deputy Chief of the AFU General Staff, 2019), Igor Kolesnik;
Deputy Chief of General Staff of the AFU, Vladimir Khizhiy (2014);
Deputy Chief of General Staff of the AFU, Sergey Bessarab (from 2015 to March 2020);
Vasyl Burba, Head of the Main Intelligence Department of the AFU (from 2016 to 2020);
Commander of the AFU Ground Forces, Sergey Popko (from 2014 to 2016);
Commander of the Air Force of the AFU, Sergey Drozdov (from 2015 to 2021);
Commander of the High Mobility Airborne Troops of the AFU, Mikhail Zabrodsky (from 2015 to 2019);
Commander of the AFU Special Operations Forces, Igor Lunev (from 2016 to 2020);
Commander of the AFU Naval Forces, Igor Voronchenko (from 2016 to 2020);
Commander of the troops of the Operational Command “East” of the AFU Ground Forces, Sergey Naev (from 2018 to 2019);
Deputy Commander of the troops of the Operational Command “West” of the AFU Ground Forces (since March 22, 2017—commander of the troops of the Operational Command “West” of the AFU Ground Forces), Oleksandr Pavlyuk;
First Deputy Commander of the Operational Command “North” of the AFU Ground Forces, Andriy Grishchenko (2016);
First Deputy Commander of the troops of the Operational Command “East” of the AFU Ground Forces, Oleksandr Krasnook (2017);
First Deputy Commander of the AFU Ground Forces, Oleksandr Lokota (2016);
Commander of the 30th separate mechanized brigade of the AFU, Ivan Garaz (2015).
In total, as of July 25, 2022, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation had opened more than 1,300 criminal cases, in which more than 400 persons are being prosecuted. The preliminary investigation has already established the involvement of more than 220 persons, including representatives of the high command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and commanders of military units that shelled civilians, in crimes against peace and security of humanity that have no statute of limitations. A total of 92 commanders and their subordinates have been charged. A total of 96 individuals, including 51 AFU commanders, are wanted.

On April 3, the chairman of the Investigative Committee of Russia, Alexander I. Bastrykin, supported the initiative of the LPR representatives on the need to hold a tribunal on the war crimes of the Ukrainian regime in Donbas, expressing readiness for its establishment. He noted that the Investigative Committee of Russia has been recording all unlawful actions of the AFU and other Ukrainian nationalist military formations against the peaceful population of the Donbass for eight years. Each fact is given a legal assessment. In future, the evidence gathered by the Russian investigation will be presented to the public, and those involved in committing these crimes will be brought to trial.

Numerous war crimes by Ukrainian nationalists have already been recognized at the international level. For example, on April 6, the American publication The New York Times confirmed the authenticity of a video showing Ukrainian nationalists shooting wounded Russian servicemen, and on April 7, at a press conference in Brussels, the NATO Secretary General called for an investigation into all reports of war crimes in Ukraine, but refused to comment on video footage of Ukrainian nationalists killing Russian prisoners of war—”because he knew nothing concrete about it.”

On June 1, 2022, the chairman of the Committee on Criminal and Administrative Legislation of the People’s Council of the DNR, Elena N. Shishkina, stated that the composition of judges at the international tribunal against Ukrainian militants may include representatives of European countries “who will respond and will not be afraid to openly oppose Nazism, which thrives on the territory of the state of Ukraine,” invitations to which have been sent. She also admitted that the first meeting of the interim “Mariupol tribunal,” whose charter is being drafted, might take place before the end of the summer.

At the same time, as Bastrykin noted on July 25, 2022, “given the position of the ‘collective West,’ which openly sponsors Ukrainian nationalism and supports the Kyiv regime,” the establishment of an international tribunal, under the auspices of the United Nations, “is extremely doubtful in the current perspective. It would be more appropriate to work on this issue with Russian partners in such organizations as the CIS, CSTO, BRICS and SCO. The establishment of the court and its statutes could be formalized by an agreement between Russia, member countries of these organizations and the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics. At the same time, it would also be advisable to involve other countries demonstrating an independent position on the Ukrainian issue, based on the norms of international law, in particular Syria, Iran and Bolivia. The establishment of an international judicial body would demonstrate to the entire international community the inevitability of punishment for crimes against the peace and security of mankind and the determination of Russia and our country’s true partners in eradicating Nazism, nationalism and xenophobia.”

However, the inevitability of the complete denazification of Ukraine and the holding of an international tribunal against the war criminals of the Kyiv regime does not stop the succession of their madness, which extends not only to the civilian population of the Donbass but also to civilians in Ukraine and Russia. Thus, on April 27, at around 11 p.m. Moscow time, the Ukrainian armed forces launched a massive missile strike with Tochka-U ballistic missiles and high-powered multiple-launch rocket systems against residential neighborhoods in the central part of the city of Kherson. The targets of the indiscriminate missile strike by the nationalists were residential neighborhoods near Ushakov Avenue, where kindergartens, schools and many social institutions are also located. Russian air defense units repelled the missile attack by Ukrainian troops on residential areas of Kherson. Twelve high-powered multiple rocket launchers and two Ukrainian Tochka-U ballistic missiles were shot down in the air above the city. Fragments of one of the downed Ukrainian Tochka-U missiles fell in Shevchenko Park. The indiscriminate missile strikes by the Kyiv nationalist regime against residential areas in Izium and Kherson constitute a war crime and a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.

Another example is the shelling, by units of the Ukrainian armed forces, of the liberated villages of Kiselevka and Shirokaya Balka in the Kherson region on May 1st. The Ukrainian nationalists were firing at purely civilian objects. A school and a kindergarten, in the village of Kiselevka, came under artillery fire. Also, artillery fire was purposefully directed at the cemetery located on the outskirts of Shirokaya Balka, where there were people at that moment. As a result of the shelling, civilians were injured and killed. The buildings of the school, kindergarten and private houses were seriously damaged. Because of the consequences of the shelling by the AFU, the residents of these settlements were partially deprived of electricity.

Since February 25, Ukrainian nationalists have been subjecting civilian infrastructure facilities on the territory of Russia—the Belgorod, Bryansk, Voronezh, Kursk and Rostov regions—to artillery and rocket fire and air strikes. On May 11th, such a criminal act ended in tragedy for the first time: one person was killed and six others injured when Ukrainian troops shelled the village of Solokhi in the Belgorod region of the Russian Federation. Subsequently, instances of death of the population of Russia, as a result of the use of firearms by Ukraine, have been recorded on numerous occasions.

On the territory of the LNR and DNR, nationalists destroyed and partially damaged more than 7,000 civilian infrastructure facilities, including residential houses, schools, kindergartens, and vehicles. During the entire period of investigation in the criminal case of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation by mid-July 2022, more than 216,000 people were questioned; more than 91,000 people were recognized as victims, including 14,072 minors.

It is likely that after the publication of this article, other crimes of the Kiev nationalist regime will be uncovered. The investigation and decisions of the courts and the International Tribunal on the genocide of Russian people during the Great Patriotic War and, in 2014-2022, of the population of Donbass, on terror, murders and pogroms in modern Ukraine will provide new arguments to expose Hitlerism, the OUN and their modern followers, and to carry out the denazification of Ukraine.

Conclusion

Banderites in the service of the Third Reich and their pro-American followers in modern Ukraine are united by a single ideology—radical Ukrainian nationalism, Ukronazism, and its anti-Russian orientation; as well as, immorality and inhumanity; venality and service to foreign suzerains for the sake of benefits, along with a cynical trade in the interests, fates and lives of compatriots, of Ukraine and its people; grave crimes against Ukraine, which have had a massive and systemic character, namely, terror and genocide—fascist terror with the participation of the Banderaites against the people of Russia and neo-Nazi terror against the population of Donbas, and terror against the inhabitants of Odessa (Odessa Khatyn), other towns and villages, in which the Ukronazis left a bloody trail.

After the Great Victory, Ukraine was cleansed of OUN gangs and the underground in a matter of years, because the effective struggle of law enforcers against Ukronazism was accompanied by widespread popular support. The betrayal of Soviet elites in the mid-1950s (the “Adenauer-Khrushchev Amnesty”) allowed former nationalist collaborators to return to Ukraine with a completely clean reputation, almost as heroes and even martyrs.

In 2022, Russia, by giving the lives of its loyal sons for the liberation of Ukraine from nationalism, by destroying and capturing neo-Nazis, by revealing the truth about their crimes and criminal plans, is creating the conditions for the final eradication of Nazism. On July 3, as a result of successful combat operations by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, together with units of the People’s Militia of the LPR, the liberation of the Luhansk People’s Republic was completed. The military victory in the DNR and the international tribunal against the war criminals are approaching.

Both in the liberation of the Donbass and in the denazification of Ukraine, the timing and results of their completion, guarantees against recurrences of Ukronazism and the conditions for reliably ensuring the sovereignty and security of the country, the interests and rights of its population, and the sustainable development of the Ukrainian state and society largely depend on the active participation of the people of Ukraine, their awareness of the danger of radical ideologies and their open condemnation.

Vladimir G. Kiknadze is a Russian historian, associate professor and a Colonel in the reserves. He is the author of over 200 published works. This article appears courtesy of Nauka, Obshchestvo, Oborona journal.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... f-ukraine/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 04, 2023 11:59 am

spins of propaganda
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/04/2023

Image

Last Sunday, July 30, Ukrainska Pravda headlined: "ISW Analyzes How Russia Distorts Information About Ukrainian Counteroffensive." The outlet, one of Ukraine's leading newspapers, was based on the latest report from the Institute for the Study of War -possibly the think-tankmost cited by the western media in monitoring the war despite having shown serious deficiencies and exaggerations in their coverage- to refute the Russian discourse and, above all, to maintain the line of the Ukrainian victory narrative. This week marks two months since the resumption of large-scale hostilities on the central front, that of Zaporozhye, where Ukrainian troops have not achieved, as expected, a quick attack against the desired collapse of the Russian army.

With the start of the offensive, Kiev was anxious not only to break the priority front, but to take advantage of the numerical superiority it maintains, even despite the Russian mobilization, to also erase the advances of the Russian Federation troops in the previous weeks. . In May, Russia had achieved its main offensive success for months and had finally captured the city of Artyomovsk, now completely destroyed and practically uninhabited. However, amid a growing public dispute between Evgeny Prigozhin and Sergey Shoigu, Wagner's troops, who were leading the assault, withdrew from the city almost immediately, leaving no chance to consolidate the Artyomovsk flanks or drive out the the surrounding Ukrainian troops. There he fought, for example, the brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine commanded by Colonel Andriy Biletsky, leader of the Azov movement. The presence of ultranationalist troops, possibly the most ideologically motivated to fight against Russia, made clear the intention to continue fighting in that sector.

It is probable that, as it did in the case of Soledar, whose loss was not officially announced until a dozen days after the events, Ukraine either hoped to regain ground quickly after Wagner's withdrawal or decided not to announce such a tactical defeat until it had of good news with which to mitigate the blow. Artyomovsk was never a strategic city, but the Ukrainian narrative had made it a symbolic target. So much so that the commander of the ground forces, Sirsky, has repeatedly singled it out as a priority target. In May, the commander announced that the Russian troops were practically under siege, a semi-encirclement that he announced again as great news in June, regardless of the inconsistency of having announced the same thing weeks before. the western press,

Ukraine has not managed to erase, for the moment, the main Russian offensive success of 2023 and now faces the defensive: the defense prepared for months waiting for an offensive in which it always knew what the main and secondary directions would be. With no chance of surprise, and no air cover necessary for a major ground offensive, Ukrainian armored columns, led by small numbers of Western tanks escorted by Russian-made tanks, advanced over the open Zaporozhye countryside only to clash with the minefields and Russian artillery superiority. The large number of images available and the insistence of the authorities and intelligence services of Western countries to quickly disclose any slightest Ukrainian advance makes it easy to observe the situation on the ground and check the status of the counteroffensive. It has never been necessary to go to Russian sources to verify the disappointment that, for the moment, the Ukrainian attack is causing for its Western partners.

American media such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, Político, CNBC or Time and British media such as The Telegraph have already published analyzes in which they admit the high losses of material, the difficulty in overcoming the barriers of Russian mines or the damage caused the Russian artillery. Even The Kyiv Posthas published reports on the high casualties that Ukraine is suffering in its confrontation with Russia which, according to the soldiers he quotes, are equivalent to four or five Ukrainians killed to advance a hundred meters. As can be seen even with the Ukrainian war reports, in which there are no major advance announcements, there are entire sectors of the front where the Ukrainian troops attack, but do not even manage to advance those few meters. What's more, the only declaration really favorable to Ukraine that has been produced in the last two months has been that of Evgeny Prigozhin, who, before his private army mutinied against the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, spoke of breaking the front and Ukrainian approach to Crimea. A month after those words, there is no sign of those movements,

However, according to Ukrainska Pravda , "analysts point out that the so-called Russian ultranationalist information space seems to be coming together to promote the Kremlin's narratives aimed at presenting the Ukrainian counter-offensive as a failure, increasingly exaggerating Ukrainian losses and downplaying Russian casualties and shortages." . Curiously, the nationalist information space has been, since the beginning of the special military operation , one of the most critical of the Russian actions and has repeatedly accused the Kremlin and the Interior Ministry of forcing the troops to fight with one hand tied to the back . The media and social media channels linked to Evgeny Prigozhin are the clearest example, but not the only one.

The second argument is also interesting, since the exaggeration of the casualties of others and the denial of their own has been a practice shared by both parties to the conflict. Those figures given daily by the Ukrainian and Russian defense ministries are, by definition, part of information warfare. However, for many months, the figures given by Ukraine have been published and taken for granted in the Western press. These data have disappeared from the headlines in recent months, possibly because of the crazy figures, which do not seek the slightest realism or consistency with those given by their own allies. Of course, as a recent article published by the Quincy Institute stated, the practice of hiding Ukrainian casualties remains, a state secret that journalists have given up investigating.

A few hours after the publication of the Ukrainska Pravda article on Russian nationalist manipulation, Time published an article in which he stated that "the problems of the Ukrainian counter-offensive cannot be fixed only with more weapons and training." The fact that it is the Western press, the same one that continues to protect Ukraine by helping it hide the real cost of the war in terms of casualties, who is showing the Ukrainian shortcomings is proof enough of the result of these two months of counteroffensive. “An intense battle has raged this week in southeastern Ukraine as Kiev attempted a major push to retake territory with a fresh injection of Western-trained and equipped troops, but still no sign of any breakthrough,” The Washington wrote yesterday . Post . After HIMARS, Patriots and Leopards, Western-trained troops are the new Ukraine's wunderwaaffe of Ukraine and its partners to achieve what two months of attacks have failed to do. Faced with the blitzkrieg that Kiev wanted, the counteroffensive has entered the trenches, forcing Ukraine to modify its tactics.

For now, that change has only succeeded in stopping, or slowing down, the bleeding of material losses. With few exceptions, the large armored columns, which were easy targets for Russian artillery and kamikaze drones, have given way to other types of attacks. There seems to be a broad consensus even among Western analysts that the change has not yet produced great results either. They differ, yes, the causes with which the blockade is explained. Just yesterday, no longer giving the slightest semblance of seriousness, the daily British intelligence report blamed the Ukrainian difficulties on the vegetation that has grown in the fields of southern Ukraine since the war began.

In a slightly more professional tone, The New York Times, who wanted to see strategic successes in the capture of villages with barely a hundred inhabitants, lamented the state of the offensive. Always from the feeling of superiority of the American equipment, personnel and tactics against the Russians, the medium looked for the causes of the situation. “Officials in the Biden administration hoped that the nine Western-trained brigades, around 36,000 strong, would show that the US way of waging war is superior to the Russian approach. If the Russians have a rigidly centralized command structure, the Americans taught the Ukrainians to empower experienced soldiers to make quick battlefield decisions and deploy combined arms tactics - synchronized attacks by infantry and armored forces and artillery." explains the outlet, lamenting the "risk that it may pose" for Ukraine "to return to its old tactics". Thus, the constant is repeated that each Ukrainian success is attributed to Western weapons or tactics and each failure is explained by accusing Ukraine of returning to its past, that is, to Russian or Soviet tactics.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/04/27859/#more-27859

Google Translator

The blaming of 'Russian-Soviet' tactics is the same lame-ass poor-mouthing that we heard from Nazi generals 70 years ago. And while there was truth to that in 1941 by 1943 those problems were history as the Soviets adapted. As the Russians adapt to every 'wunderwaffe' the West throws at them now. (And let me add that trope was built into the games like Panzer Blitz providing a small advantage to the nazi player but greater psychological/propaganda effect. Small wonder, as the game was designed by a Pentagon consultant. Goebbels never sleeps...

******.

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 3, 2023
August 3, 2023
Rybar

In the Starobelsky direction, Russian units continue their creeping offensive in the forests near Kremennaya , as well as near Novoselovsky . In the Karmazinovka area , the situation has stabilized, the RF Armed Forces do not allow the enemy to rotate units.

On the Vremyevsky sector, the enemy once again tried to attack Harvest and Priyutnoye , however, having suffered losses, he was forced to retreat to their original positions. In addition, an unsuccessful attempt to attack Rabotino was made by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Orekhovsky sector .

Fighting continues in the Soledar direction in the area of ​​​​Kleshcheevka and the Berkhovsky reservoir . The Armed Forces of Ukraine suffered heavy losses and failed to achieve significant success over the past day, but the situation is still far from stable.

Image

Fighting near Novoselovsky

Image
For several days , intense fighting has been going on in the Novoselovsky area. The units of the Russian army are attacking enemy strongholds, operating from Kuzemovka and trying to take up important tactical positions to advance deep into the defense. According to unconfirmed reports, Russian troops were able to advance north of Novoselovsky. Clashes also continue to the south near the plantations adjacent to the village.

At the same time, advanced reconnaissance groups of the RF Armed Forces are conducting raids on the lines of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the village itself. The line of control in this area is not known for certain due to the fog of war, at the moment the fighting continues.

About the appearance of Polish armored personnel carriers Rosomak

Ukrainian sources publish footage of the Rosomak armored personnel carrier in service with the new 44th mechanized brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The photo was most likely taken at the Kremensky section . As early as July 10, we wrote that the 44th Ombre was deployed from the Chernihiv region . This is also supported by the forested area in the background. A new unit was formed in Nizhyn, and 50 Polish armored personnel carriers, as well as 20 Valuk armored fighting vehicles, were transferred to its balance.

So far, there is no evidence that the 44th Ombre was involved in the battles near Kremennaya. However, its presence and the intensification of shelling of the city indicates a possible counterattack of the enemy in order to reach the settlement.

The situation on the front line and the fighting

Image
In the Starobelsky direction, the main events unfolded in the Serebryansky forestry . If positional battles continue on the right flank of the RF Armed Forces, then in the south and southeast of Dibrova , the combined assault detachments of the RF Armed Forces went on the attack. Due to the inaccessibility of the terrain, the configuration of the front is still unclear, but, according to confirmed data, the Russian military personnel were able to advance, knocking out the formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from several positions.

A high level of casualties is noted in the ranks of Ukrainian units: the 3rd battalion of the 66th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is being withdrawn from 13 strongholds. Also, the formation of 1 arr of special forces 9 AK was replaced. At Karmazinovka , Ukrainian formations continue to roll on the positions of the RF Armed Forces near the ledge. Enemy attacks continue in small infantry groups without armored vehicles, but with artillery support.

But no matter how hard the Ukrainian units try, at the moment Russian fighters are fighting off the attacks. Artillerymen of the 21st Motorized Rifle Brigade, together with aviation, in response, hit the strongholds of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

In the Soledar direction, fighting is underway on the northern and southern flanks of Bakhmut . Ukrainian formations continue to roll on the positions of the RF Armed Forces in the area of ​​​​the Berkhovsky reservoir , but the Russian fighters manage to hold their positions. Meanwhile, violent clashes are going on in the Kleshcheevka area and nearby Andreevka .

In the Donetsk direction, the situation has not changed. In Marinka and Avdeevsky fortified area, the parties are engaged in artillery duels, making separate attempts to attack each other's positions.

Image
The situation remains tense in the Vremievsky section . According to the Warrior of the Far East , the Ukrainian marines resumed attacks near Priyutnoye , trying to gain a foothold in landings near water bodies to the northeast. A group of 10 people under the cover of an infantry fighting vehicle was hit, because of which the enemy retreated. However, judging by the formation of new assault groups at Novodarovka and the deployment of a self-propelled battery at the Temirovka - Novoivanovka line , attacks will resume soon.

And, most likely, they will be coordinated with units of the 35th brigade and 128th brigade of the TRO operating in Makarovka . In the evening, detachments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on two AFVs started a shooting battle near Staromayorsky , and a tank provided fire support from the northeast. The activity of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in this area does not subside. But at the same time, the Ukrainian command is replenishing manpower and replenishing ammunition, preparing for a new offensive.

Russian gunners, drone and aircraft operators are attacking rear areas in an attempt to thwart enemy plans. As a result of one of the hits of the Lancet, a nomadic tank of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was hit.

Image
On the Orekhovsky sector in the morning, enemy infantry groups, under the cover of two forest belts north of Rabotino , tried to rush through the minefields, where they were met by marines of the 810th Marine Brigade of the RF Armed Forces. As a result of the ensuing skirmish, the Ukrainian formations retreated.


Otherwise, the situation along the contact line has slightly stabilized. This is due to really large losses in manpower. One of the subdivisions of the 47th brigade of the 9th AK of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was withdrawn to Novgorod - Volynsky for restoration. At the same time, the transfer of reinforcements to the advanced positions continues. Columns of military equipment were noted near Orekhov , Malaya Tokmachka , Belogorye and Krasnaya Krinitsa .

Also, closer to the front line in Tavriyskoye and Zheleznyanskoye, self-propelled and howitzer divisions of 116 and 117 mechanized brigades of 10 AK were pulled together. The movement of artillery to the LBS indicates an imminent intensification of hostilities.

In the Kherson direction, scouts of the Dnepr group of troops were able to detect self-propelled guns 2S1 on the right bank of the Kherson region. After the coordinates of the artillery installation were transmitted, the target was destroyed.

In general, the situation in this direction remains the same: the Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to land on the left bank in small groups, regular artillery duels are taking place. Despite this, the units of the RF Armed Forces in this area need help: the fighters often experience problems with communications and fire support. If the situation is not paid attention to, then there is a possibility that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to go on the offensive here in the future .

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine once again attacked the settlements of the Kursk region. The enemy fired four shells at the village of Elizavetovka : two houses, a power line and a gas pipe were damaged. Local residents also reported about the shelling of the village of Krasnooktyabrsky .


In addition, the enemy again fired at the border areas of the Bryansk region. From 10 am, about 20 arrivals were recorded in the village of Solovyovka : at least two houses were damaged, the village was partially de-energized.

Image
In the Belgorod region, Ukrainian formations attacked the village of Mokraya Orlovka . A residential building and a car were damaged, as well as power lines, no one was injured. In addition, local residents reported arrivals in the Valkovsky farm and the village of Kukuevka .

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine also do not stop striking at the Donetsk agglomeration and other settlements of the Republic. Damage was recorded in Kirovsky , Kuibyshevsky , Kievsky and Petrovsky districts of Donetsk , two people were injured. Nikolskoye , Vladimirovka , Blagodatnoye , Makiivka , Gorlovka and Yasinovataya were hit throughout the day , with one man injured by a grenade dropped from an enemy drone. In total, over two hundred shells were fired by the enemy at the civilian infrastructure of the DPR.

Image
In the Kherson region, the enemy fired at least three dozen shells at such settlements as Bolshaya Lepetikha , Dnepryany , Kakhovka and Novaya Kakhovka . There are no victims or injured.

Political events
On upcoming talks in Saudi Arabia on Ukraine

In the information field, discussions continue on the upcoming summit on Ukraine, which should be held in Saudi Arabia . The West plans to make another attempt to win over the countries of the “Global South”, most of which are the most important partners of Russia, but have not yet taken an unambiguous side in the Ukrainian conflict. Recall that Russia was not invited to this meeting, and at the summit itself it is planned to lobby exclusively for the Ukrainian formula of peace.

In this regard , Brazil announced that the country's delegation would not go to the event in Jeddah and would take part remotely. The adviser to the Brazilian leader recalled that at a similar meeting in Copenhagen , it was not possible to reach a consensus on Ukraine, since Kiev only wanted to discuss its own formula for stopping the war there. The Brazilian leadership has declared its desire for an early peace, for the sake of which, however, it is not ready to sever relations with Russia. Earlier, Mexican President Andres Manuel López Obrador said that the country would not participate in peace talks in Ukraine unless Russia was invited to them.

Nevertheless, the Wall Street Journal speculated about the possible participation of a Chinese delegation in the summit. Initially, China , like Russia, was not invited to this meeting, however, against the backdrop of a dwindling number of participants, the event may be in jeopardy. Beijing has not yet confirmed this information. However, the trip of the Chinese delegation does not mean that Beijing has decided to change its position on the Ukrainian conflict. As the newspaper notes, among all the countries of the "Global South" it is China that most actively supports Moscow. It is possible that the PRC will try to sabotage Kyiv's peace plan by urging the countries of the "Global South" to compromise with Russia.

On the search for those responsible for the unsuccessful offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Against the background of the unsuccessful counter-offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the search for the guilty continues in the West . Another example of this was the statements by Western officials that after the first attempts at a counteroffensive in the south, Ukrainian formations changed tactics, discarding what they were taught by instructors abroad.

The New York Times notes that NATO is skeptical of UAF attempts to wear down Russian forces with artillery and long-range missiles, as well as Ukrainian attempts to attack in small groups. Janes, a British intelligence company, said the strategy of attacking in small units is likely to result in high losses in personnel and equipment with minimal advance. In this regard, the United States is concerned that Ukraine may be at a disadvantage due to the lack of ammunition and equipment in a war of attrition .

The most original excuse came up in the British Ministry of Defense. According to local officials, shrubs and small trees have become an important factor holding back the advancement of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Zaporozhye . Vegetation is said to provide additional cover, helping to camouflage Russian defensive positions and making clearing minefields more difficult. Perhaps we will refrain from additional comments.

However, these statements should not be taken lightly. We have repeatedly said that such statements, as well as publications in the Western media, are a product of the information war. Under the guise of "trusted sources " and "officials" may be hiding another information stuffing of the enemy, aimed at misinforming the Russians. The offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is failing, but it is not over yet. A tense situation remains in some sectors of the front, and therefore we will not relax and will bring the matter to a victorious end.

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

(Other images at link.)

On increasing the production of ammunition in the United States
August 3, 2023
Rybar

Image

The Financial Times reports that officials in the United States are actively working to increase the production of 155mm ammunition, including with a view to further deliveries to Ukraine .

By 2025, the Americans plan to increase the production of shells for howitzers M777 to the level of 90 thousand ammunition per month .

For these purposes, defense enterprises are being re-equipped in the Canadian province of Ontario , as well as new workshops are being erected in the state of Texas . Similar complexes will be built in the states of Iowa, Arkansas and Kansas.

In addition, the US administration has concluded agreements on the supply of 155-mm shells of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with Bulgaria and the Republic of Korea, and is also currently negotiating with the leadership of Japan .

In the situation described, it is embarrassing that the existing production facilities in the United States produce only 24 thousand ammunition per month - this is about 100 shells per hour when working in one shift of 8 hours. This is not enough even for a modest defense plant with conveyor lines. Only by the decision to introduce a second shift can output be increased to 40,000 without the need to deploy new enterprises.

However, the remark would be true if the West did not pursue the goal of using as much money as possible, including the construction of additional infrastructure under the pretext of the Ukrainian conflict. Not to mention the fact that with the current intensity of the artillery battle, the amount of ammunition produced is enough for just a few days.

https://rybar.ru/o-narashhivanii-proizv ... ov-v-ssha/

The Polish-Ukrainian controversy “who owes whom” continued
August 2, 2023
Warsaw Mermaid

Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki criticized the Ukrainian authorities for calling the Polish ambassador to the Foreign Ministry because of Marcin Przydacz's remarks.

💬“The call of the Polish ambassador, the representative of the country that was the only one left in Kiev on the day of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, was not supposed to take place at the Foreign Ministry . In international politics, in the conditions of the ongoing war and given the huge support that Poland has provided to Ukraine, such mistakes should not be made. We will always defend the good name of Poland, its security, and the interests of no other country will ever prevail over the interests of Poland, ”said Morawiecki .

Recall that the ambassador was summoned to the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry because the Polish politician Marcin Przydacz stated that Ukrainians were ingratitude for the help provided by Poland.

The Ukrainian authorities called the official's statement untrue and unacceptable.

At the same time, tension between the allies continues to grow: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland stated that there could be no final reconciliation with Ukraine without a “settlement” of the issue of the Volyn massacre.

This was announced by Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the country Pavel Yablonsky. He stressed that although Kiev is under attack, the Ukrainian authorities should not attack their allies.

According to him, Poland supports Ukraine to the extent that it corresponds to its national interests - while he urged "to respect the people who help."

📌At the same time, Yablonsky pointed out that the current Polish-Ukrainian relations are “not the best”, and no one hides this. And the big problem in these relations is the Volyn massacre.

https://rybar.ru/polsko-ukrainskaya-pol ... dolzhenie/

Is the US draining the Polish ruling coalition?
August 2, 2023
Warsaw Mermaid

Before the parliamentary elections in Poland, the US reaction to the current initiatives of the Polish leadership is very indicative. Here are examples.
First, the United States coldly reacted to the recent incident with Belarusian helicopters, which either violated Polish airspace or not.

Pentagon spokesman Pat Ryder said there were no further changes in the position of NATO forces in connection with the incident .

But in Washington, of course, the security of the alliance is taken very seriously and continues to work with allies to ensure "every square inch of NATO is secure."

Secondly, let's remember the fact that in June last year, US President Joe Biden offered Ukraine's neighboring countries, including Poland, assistance in the construction of granaries. However, the promise is successfully forgotten.

The Ministry of Agriculture of Poland recently decided to remind the US government about this, but the American side " did not take any position on this matter ."

📌For Polish agriculture, Ukrainian grain has been, is and will be a problem: Ukraine is a powerful grain producer, has excellent climatic and soil conditions (most of the soil is black soil), a developed agrarian structure, and agricultural exports account for half of the country's GDP. Thus, it is obvious that Ukraine will produce and export grain, including (and now, perhaps, mainly) to the EU market.

Ukraine is a serious player (4th in the ranking before the special operation) in the global grain market, and EU countries, such as Spain, depend on its supplies. Therefore, despite the difficulties, countries for which Ukrainian grain is very important will continue to look for new ways to export.

Probably, one way or another, it will be transported through Poland. And if the Poles are ready to put up with transit, then the Poles are not ready to agree that the republic will become the target market for this grain.

Transit - yes, import - no, at present this is a condition for the survival of Polish agriculture. However, much depends on the investigation that was launched regarding the distribution of products in Poland: the data is classified. Little is known: that there were frauds, and deputies from the ruling coalition participated in them. If the top authorities have plans to use the country to sell agricultural products, they will do it without hesitation.

In any case, elevators are needed to store grain. Just them President Biden promised to build. But there are no such plans in the White House office yet. Moreover, there are no other concepts to support the smooth transit of agricultural products from Ukraine either. Given the protracted plans for transportation, investments in infrastructure and the construction of border crossings with Ukraine, both road and rail, will be necessary .

However, the US is gradually freezing relations with the current Polish leadership?

https://rybar.ru/ssha-slivayut-polskuyu ... oalicziyu/

Google Translator

******

The Conflict in Ukraine and the Political Battle Over Feeding a Hungry World
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 3, 2023
Dmitri Kovalevich

Image

July marked the one-and-a-half year anniversary of the start of the Russian Special Military Operation (SMO) in Ukraine. The key developments during the past month were Russia’s withdrawal from the agreement reached one year ago by each of Russia and Ukraine with Turkey and the UN for exports of grain from Ukraine, and the failure of the ‘counteroffensive’ launched nearly two months ago by the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU).

End of a grain export deal

On July 18, the Russian Federation announced it would not renew the agreement allowing for the export of grain from Ukraine through that country’s Black Sea ports. The ‘Black Sea Grain Initiative’ was an agreement reached by each of Russia and Kiev in July 2022 with Turkey and the United Nations, to last 120 days. It was renewed for an additional 120 days in November.

The Russian Ministry of Defense announced that as of midnight on July 20, all ships en route to Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea are considered as potential carriers of military cargo and therefore potentially involved in the conflict on the side of the Kiev regime.

The refusal by the Russian Federation to renew the agreement is caused by the fact that the conditions in the agreement allowing for the export of fertilizers and other agricultural products from Russia have not been respected and followed by the Western powers. They continue to threaten sanctions against countries purchasing Russian products. In addition, they continued to block the repair and reopening of the Tolyatti-to-Odessa ammonia pipeline [1], the world’s longest at nearly 2,500 km. It was ruptured by a bombing by Ukrainian saboteurs on June 5, 2023.

In addition, the Western cutoff of Russian financial institutions from the SWIFT system for international payments remains in place, meaning foreign buyers of Russian grain and any other products cannot easily pay.

Corporate and state media in the West have been scaring their readers with stories and headlines that the termination of the grain deal will cause a sharp rise in global food prices and a global food crisis. They seek to influence such hard-pressed countries as Yemen, Sudan, and Ethiopia by claiming that the actions of the Russian Federation may condemn the poorest people and countries on the planet to starvation. This is a blatant lie. Most of the grain exported from Ukraine during the past year was sold to traders in Turkey and Europe. Among its uses has been to feed pigs in Spain, in preparation for slaughter. Russia claims that only three percent of the grain has gone to the poorest countries.

Russian President Vladimir Putin published an essay in advance of the Russia-Africa Summit 2023 (in St. Petersburg on July 27-28). According to the data cited in the essay, more than 70 percent of Ukraine’s exports under the grain deal went to high-income countries, including the European Union. Less than three percent went to the world’s hardest-pressed countries, such as Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia, Yemen and Afghanistan.

Putin wrote, “This ‘deal’, however, while it was publicly advertised by the West as a gesture of goodwill that benefited Africa, has in fact been shamelessly used solely for the enrichment of large U.S. and European businesses that exported and resold grain from Ukraine.”

Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto told an interview with the Italian newspaper La Stampa on July 21 that 95 percent of Ukrainian grain is going elsewhere than to Africa.

The International Monetary Fund is also concerned about the prospects for the grain deal and a possible reduction in grain sales by Ukrainian firms as this would reduce the capacity of the country to pay back its loans from international financial institutions such as the IMF itself. According to IMF calculations, if current bans on imports of Ukrainian grain by some countries in eastern Europe are extended (yes, some European ‘allies’ of Ukraine are banning food imports from it) and if the grain export deal is broken, this could lead to producer losses of over $800 million per month, about $10 billion per year.

Whither Ukraine and its agricultural industries?

As formerly one of the most industrially developed Soviet republics, Ukraine is reverting to becoming a primarily agrarian country, as it was 100 years ago when Soviet Ukraine was founded. Exports of grain and sunflowers now account for about half of all revenues to the public budget earned form exports. In fact, even before the start of the SMO, Ukraine’s economy was reverting to the model that had existed on its lands for thousands of years – rafting grain on river barges down to the Black Sea for sale while buying industrial products and weapons in return. Today’s Western ‘partners’ are, indeed, most interested in Ukraine as a supplier of cheap agricultural products for resale by Western giant agricultural firms to third countries. Ukrainian grain is now sold at a big discount.

During the one-year duration of the grain deal, Ukraine exported 50.6 million tons of grain worth $9.8 billion, according to a report in USA Today. (A different set of news reports speak of 32 million tons of grain worth $8–9 billion.)

Kiev would like to see NATO warships and especially Turkish warships off its shorelines to enforce a ‘grain deal’ on its own, exclusive terms. But the U.S. is advising Kiev to focus on overland grain export routes for now, that is, by road or rail to central and western to Europe.

Land exports are much more expensive and complicated for the Kiev regime to operate. The country’s railroads and highways cannot handle such an influx of cargo, especially as weapons, ammunition and humanitarian aid are flowing the other way and already clogging the routes. Furthermore, lack of maintenance over the years in ‘independent’ Ukraine (that is, post-Soviet Ukraine) of railways and roads looms large. In late July, one of the bridges over a mountain pass in Transcarpathia being used to transport agricultural products collapsed. The bridge collapsed not because of Russian shelling but because of the years of neglect of infrastructure by successive governments in Ukraine in the post-Soviet years.

Ukraine’s neighbors are clearly not happy about the proposals to increase overland exports. Cheap Ukrainian grain is supposed to go to ‘starving’ Third World countries. But thousands of tons have ended up in eastern European countries, depressing the prices that local farmers, already hard-pressed financially, might otherwise receive.

The government of Poland is ready to improve the transit of Ukrainian grain through its territory, but is demanding that the EU helps pay for infrastructure upkeep (and here). This is phrased as a demand for “solidarity” from the EU with Ukraine. All five EU countries that currently ban the sale (though not transport) of Ukrainian grain–Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, and Bulgaria—want the EU to help pay increased transport infrastructure costs.

An alternative grain shipping route?

On July 20, Ukraine informed the UN of its decision to seek an alternative route for grain shipments. Ukraine’s First Deputy Minister of Infrastructure Development Vasyl Shkurakov sent a letter to the UN’s International Maritime Organization saying that Ukraine has decided to create a temporary sea route for grain shipments after Russia’s withdrawal from the grain deal. According to the letter, it is planned to open shipping routes from the three inland ports of Izmail, Kiliya and Reni, located on the lower Danube, using smaller, ‘coaster’ vessels. These vessels would use a corridor through the inland and Black sea waters of Romania, a NATO member. Previously, grain was shipped along a corridor near to, but not through, the territorial waters of Black Sea states.

The three, proposed Danube ports have only been shelled in late July.

The disadvantage of this route is its low capacity. Bulk carriers of large tonnage cannot use it because the Danube River bottom is too shallow (app. seven meters draft). The U.S. recently promised Kiev that it would finance the dredging of the lower stretch of the river in the future, but this is unlikely until the conflict ends. What’s more, the proposal will have environmentalists up in arms because much of the Danube Delta remains untouched by industry and industrial shipping. This route is already being used for arms and ammunition shipments into Ukraine via NATO members Romania and Bulgaria.

The ending of the grain trade at the end of July was marked by massive rocket attacks by Russia against the ports of the Odessa region, which had not been shelled before. The Ukrainian Telegram channel ‘First. News of war‘ reports that “The recent attack on the ports of Odessa region near the border with Romania were aimed at destroying warehouses there filled with Western-supplied weapons. Recall that the Russian side has repeatedly accused the Western countries of using the ‘grain corridor’ to supply weapons, shells, and equipment to Ukraine. The recent large-scale attacks on the port and the subsequent explosions, visible on the shore from the Romanian side [some 50 km away], indicates that weapons were indeed being stored in the port’s grain terminals.”

Another reason for Russia’s withdrawal from the grain deal was Kiev’s use of the Black Sea to launch military attacks. In particular, on July 17, the bridge linking the Crimea peninsula to the Russian mainland was attacked. Naval drones launched from the Black Sea were used for this purpose.

This was the second such attack against the bridge. On July 26, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), Vasyl Malyuk, admitted that the first attack against the bridge in October 2022 was the work of his agency. At the time, Zelensky had denied that Ukraine was behind that explosion, which killed five civilians. The words of the SBU head, then, actually prove that Zelensky lied.

Russia commits to supplying grain to the poorest countries

Since Ukrainian grain has hardly reached the poorest countries of Africa, the Russian Federation has promised to supply five of them with free grain while others will receive favorable prices. Russia has surplus grain production, but foreign buyers have difficulty in paying due to Western economic sanctions and strangulation. So one solution for Russia is to donate grain for humanitarian needs, especially since the Russian budget is much less dependent than Ukraine’s on revenues from grain exports.

In 2022, Russia harvested a record 158 million tons of grain, including 104 million tons of wheat. More than 55 million tons were exported. The Russian Ministry of Agriculture estimates the 2023 grain harvest at 123 million tons, including 78 million tons of wheat.

The head of the analytical department of the Russian Grain Union (RGU), Elena Tyurina, said in late July that even after the withdrawal from the grain deal, Russia was able to replace all the volumes of Ukrainian wheat for the countries in need. She also noted that the countries that bought Ukrainian wheat before the grain deal, including Egypt, Indonesia, Turkey, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, have now increased their purchases of Russian wheat.

Tyurina also noted that following last season’s successful results, Russia has significantly increased the volume of supplies to African countries, including Tanzania, Mozambique, Angola, South Africa, and Kenya. “We can even count African countries as our regular buyers. Of note is that this grain has been sold on a commercial basis. The exact quantities of grain that we will supply for free will be decided at a higher level.

“We have also displaced France on the Algerian market, increasing our deliveries there by 6.5 times. That is, we are getting stronger in the African market, very seriously so,” the specialist explains.

According to Russian media, Cuba is also considering the purchase of grain from the Rostov region of Russia. Cuba imported 43,700 tons of Russian products in the agricultural year 2021/2022, mostly in the form of wheat. In the first half of 2023, Russia has already exported 76,000 tons of wheat to Cuba. Meanwhile, Russia’s Leningrad region alone plans to export about 800,000 tons of grain to Africa.

No shortage of food production in the world, says analyst

Arkady Zlochevsky, president of the Russian Grain Union, says there should be no shortage of grain and food in the world. “A deficit is impossible in principle. The world has never experienced a shortage of food resources in relation to the level of consumption. There have always been surpluses. All the facts of hunger, malnutrition and risks in different territories are linked to completely different reasons–not a lack of food resources but a lack of purchasing power, when there is no money to pay for food or there is lack of infrastructure or logistics for delivery.

“The world has never known any other causes of hunger or malnutrition. Therefore, it is inappropriate to phrase the current issue in such a way that the lack of Ukrainian exports creates the risk of hunger and famine. The absence of one of the countries competing for food exports does not create a risk of famine. The other countries will immediately adjust and make up for it,” Zlochevskyy said.

Earlier, Russian Federation Council Speaker Valentina Matviyenko, an ethnic Ukrainian from western Ukraine, announced Russia would supply grain and fertilizer to some African countries free of charge and supply these on a commercial basis to others.

In late July, one of the world’s poorest countries, the Republic of Mali, was the first to receive free grain from Russia. “We have already received a shipment of wheat and we are expecting a shipment of fertilizers soon,” said Alie Tounkara, a member of the Malian parliament while preparing to attend the Russia Africa Summitt 2023 in St. Petersburg which took place on July 27, 28. He expressed his gratitude the shipments. “We have a very acute problem with the supply of fertilizer in the country. This is a strategic product for us because our land is infertile. We thank Russia for supplying with grain and fertilizers free of charge.”

Food supply initiatives and examples such as this one to Mali are, in fact, essential to helping the poorest countries get out of debt and get out from under the tutelage of Western imperialist institutions.

Note:

[1] Ammonia is derived from fossil fuels, and most global production is used to produce anhydrous ammonia, an essential fertilizer for world agricultural production. China is the world’s largest ammonia producer, with Russia and the U.S. in second place, each with about one third of China’s production.

Monthly situation report on Ukraine by Dmitri Kovalevich, July 31, 2023 (Dmitri Kovalevich is a special correspondent in Ukraine for Al Mayadeen English.


https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... gry-world/

******

Reflection of the attack on Novorossiysk
August 4, 9:20 am

Image

At night, the enemy tried to attack Novorossiysk with naval drones.
The drones found the Olenegorsky miner large landing ship and the Suvorovets anti-sabotage boat.
Both drones were destroyed by fire from automatic weapons.

Also at night, the enemy tried to attack the Crimea with a large number of drones. All were launched 13 pieces. 10 were destroyed by air defense forces, another 3 were suppressed by electronic warfare.

PS. There were videos from Novorossiysk. The previous reports about the successful reflection of the attack are frankly not true - one of the drones damaged the Olenegorsky miner large landing ship, which was trimmed on board due to the flooding of 1 or 2 compartments.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8542711.html

Google Translator

******

Is Biden Preparing the Ground to Get Out of Ukraine War?

Martin Jay

August 3, 2023

It would make a lot of sense for Biden to start talks, Martin Jay writes.

Are backchannel talks going on between the Biden camp and that of Putin’s? Despite a number of articles in the U.S. press alluding to this, a number of Russian experts who follow such matters closely reject this idea. In a nutshell, their arguments are that Putin is in such a strong position on so many levels that there is no possibility that he would entertain such an idea and that the reports, as elusive and opaque as they are, are nothing but wishful thinking from those in the West who have joined up the dots and see no endgame in Ukraine.

And yet there are some, perhaps operating on the fringe of the events, who insist such talks are either going on, or are about to start. Edward Luttwak, an author on world events and an advisor to many world leaders, is often dismissed as a bit of an eccentric, at best, by Russian experts. But a recent interview he gave summarised that such talks are imminent if they have not already started. Furthermore, he argues that he knows who is participating in them – the CIA director himself and his opposite number in Moscow.

The Russian hacks who don’t take him seriously argue that Luttwak is obsessed with the idea of an imminent war between China and the West and that Biden is worried about any confrontation with China and therefore wants to get out of Ukraine as soon as possible to prepare the U.S. The geopolitical expert, who has written well over 20 books in his career, believes that a war with China is inevitable but, perhaps more far-fetched, that the West wouldn’t send its own troops but opt for a partner for the cannon fodder: Russia.

Yes, it’s pretty crazy and some might pause to recollect themselves after falling over with laughter. But Luttwak, who is considered a China expert by the Japanese, might be right on the first count as, furthermore, he has no doubts about the Biden administration noting the more threatening and bellicose tone to Xi’s speeches of late.

If Biden really does take the threat of China seriously, this would certainly explain a notion that he wants to get out of Ukraine.

We should be very sceptical about the ridiculous narrative which is being offered by Biden and his circus of half wits like Kirby of Sullivan who parrot the “Putin is over” in Ukraine line. In reality, they know this is a farce designed to put on a brace face not only to the American public but also to Putin himself. The message to Putin is “even if we are not doing well in Ukraine, we still win the media war, buddy”.

But is this even true?

Journalists in the last two weeks have started to accept a few realities about the war in Ukraine not working out at all for the West. Recent pieces in the Wall Street Journal and New York Times have both admitted as much, which is a milestone. But, worse, they also offer drawing on Ukraine’s reserve soldiers as a last strategy.

Amidst all this it would make a lot of sense for Biden to start talks. There are two strong points which need to be underlined, before we dismiss the idea that he is doing that and that he does indeed want an exit strategy to the war. Firstly, it is conceivable that the Ukrainians just simply ran out of ammunition without the Pentagon and NATO bosses knowing that it would happen and when. Biden knew the precise month when this would happen but took no measures to garner 2nd generation equipment around the world to plug the hole but preferred to let the war just come to an abrupt end. Why?

Also, much was made of his refusal to allow Ukraine to have NATO membership, which was put down to a number of reasons, none of which were particularly convincing. Could the real answer be that he wants to keep NATO membership of Ukraine as a bargaining chip? And that he allowed the Ukrainian army to run out of ammo as this would present both sides with the perfect breathing space to begin negotiations? If Luttwak’s China theory is correct, a lot makes sense. But in fact, the China Crisis as we know it – conflict – actually presents itself in a different form as we witness the normalisation of reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop. Is Biden worried that as the investigation goes on, more dirt will be dug up on him about his dirty deals in Ukraine? Are the 5m USD bribes which an FBI report now at least details and endorses were at the very least subject of discussions by a Ukrainian oligarch and the Bidens themselves, just the tip of the iceberg and a new massive distraction for the media is required, which usually means a war somewhere? Why not China?

https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023 ... raine-war/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 05, 2023 12:15 pm

Attacks in the Black Sea
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/05/2023

Image

In yet another demonstration that reality does not exist until the information comes from a Ukrainian or Western source, yesterday, after noon, AFP stated on Twitter that "The attack against a Russian ship at a Black Sea base has been" a success»: Ukrainian security source to AFP ”. that breaking newsIt came several hours after images of the Olenegorsky Gornyak ship being towed towards the Novorossisk naval base began circulating widely on Russian media and social media. However, following the usual line of viewing the Russian news space as a distant planet where nothing but propaganda can be found, the media waited for a Ukrainian intelligence source to boast about an attack that has been visible and that Russia has not tried to hide. What's more, since early in the morning, the attack with maritime drones both in Crimea and in Novorossisk was already the main news that circulated through the media and social network profiles in the Russian Federation. The first-hour war report mentioned attacks in those two regions and Russia boasted of the destruction of a dozen drones that intended to attack Crimea. In those hours, the press began to distribute the image of one of those drones being destroyed. The Ministry of Defense did not mention what happened to the Olenegorsky Gornyak, but the published images were enough to confirm the success of the attack. The ship was towed and, according to the Russian authorities, it does not suffer irreversible damage.

It is clear that the attack is not a strategic blow to Russia and that its importance is greater on the information front than on the military. It is also obvious that the navy is more vulnerable to attack than military land bases or front line trenches and that a single shell is capable of damaging a ship enough that it has to be towed back to its base or risk being destroyed. get lost in the depths of the sea However, it is significant that Ukraine managed to attack the Russian Black Sea Fleet, not in Crimea, better defended given the certainty that it is kyiv's main target, but in Novorossiysk. Located on the Black Sea coast, in mainland Russia, the city has a long naval tradition and it is no coincidence that one of its great monuments, a large statue of a kneeling soldier looking out to sea, presides over a memorial to sailors. But first of all, Novorossisk is in the rear, far from the front and, so far, far from the war, at least for the population. The growing danger for the fleet in the Crimea had made Russia protect itself by transferring part of its forces to the Novorossisk base, where security is now also not guaranteed.


Russian analysts point to Ukrainian revenge following the attacks carried out in recent weeks by the Russian Federation, which have attacked both the seaports in the Odessa and Nikolaev regions and the river ports on the Danube and, therefore, a few meters from Romania, a NATO member country. The end of the grain export agreement has meant for Russia the relaunch of the campaign that accuses it of making a weapon out of hunger, but also a sharp increase in the danger in the Black Sea. With control of the naval transit that guaranteed the agreement mediated by Turkey lost, it was clear that Russia was forced to attack the Ukrainian naval infrastructure precisely to try to minimize the risk that the new situation posed to its fleet.

Ukraine long ago lost the bulk of its navy, in decline since independence despite the tradition of the Nikolaev shipyards, but not the ability to harm Russia at sea. This was proven with the successful attack against the Moscva ship, one of the leaders of the Black Sea Fleet, which sank with part of its crew after a Ukrainian attack in the first weeks of the Russo-Ukrainian war. What has happened in recent weeks, with the attack on the Crimean bridge, several failed attacks in Sevastopol and yesterday's attack also show that Ukraine has used the year in which the grain export agreement has been in force, which has limited the role of the Black Sea as a theater of war, to reinforce itself and obtain weapons from its partners with which to achieve tactical success. Drones do not require large port infrastructure, detecting them is more complicated than spotting a ship and they are capable of offering Ukraine media victories with which to compensate for the difficulties it is suffering on the land front.

The attack not only gives Kiev an informational victory to boast about - and perhaps issue a stamp, as Ukraine is wont to do in cases it considers high enough in the media - but to reaffirm to the population its intention to keep its word. . Following its breakdown of the grain export agreement, Russia declared the Black Sea a danger zone and, in a statement intended to discourage third countries from risking sailing to Ukrainian ports, stated that any ship transiting through the area would be considered potential weapon bearer. Hours later, Ukraine responded with a similar threat: Any ship sailing to or from any Russian Black Sea port would be considered a legitimate target. The most radical officials of the Government of Ukraine, such as Mikhailo Podolyak or Oleksiy Danilov did not even differentiate between cargo and passenger ships. In its threat, kyiv also did not distinguish between ports in disputed areas such as Crimea or Black Sea ports on mainland Russia. With yesterday's attack, Ukraine can boast to its people and to its partners that it has kept its word. On Saturday morning, Ukraine was also making good on its promise to attack non-military vessels: maritime drones hit a freighter returning from transporting oil products in Syria.

Hours before the attack on Friday, which will not be the last but possibly will be a constant from now on, the president of the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council, Oleksiy Danilov, had stated that Ukraine seeks to deny the invincibility of those places that Russia had deemed them impassable. Danilov was referring mainly to the Kerch bridge. Unlike the first attack, in which Ukraine attacked the bridge, condemning the driver of a truck bomb to death and who has taken months to admit having committed, on this occasion Kiev has quickly claimed responsibility for the facts. Danilov's words not only refer to the bridge linking mainland Russia to Crimea or to the Black Sea, but extend to all those places on Russian territory that are within range of Ukrainian weapons. For it,

The response to yesterday's attack shows the ambitions of Ukrainian political officials, which goes beyond the results of the war. “Drones are changing the rules of the game, returning the waters to international jurisdiction and ultimately destroying the value of the Russian fleet. In fact, they are returning the whole world to the international law of the sea... So the presence of the Russian fleet in the Black Sea will end, and with it the traditional blackmail from Moscow. Ukraine will guarantee freedom and security in the Black Sea for world trade,” Mikhailo Podolyak wrote, making clear the aspiration to destroy the entire Black Sea Fleet, a notable escalation in Ukrainian threats consistent with the goal that, in its arrogance, Kiev has been marked.

In this context of constant verbal and military escalation, any possibility of a diplomatic exit in the short or medium term is completely ruled out, especially when one of the parties acts with the arrogance of someone who, despite failing to capture the abandoned villages on the front line from the front, he believes he has the moral superiority to judge the other. "I treat them calmly, but they are Asians," Danilov said yesterday about the Russian population. “They have a completely different culture, vision. Our main difference with them is humanity," said the third authority in a country that for seven years repeatedly refused to resume payment of pensions to the most vulnerable population in the war.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/05/ataqu ... more-27865

Google Translator

(Is there any doubt that Mr Danilov is a Nazi and should get the same treatment the Soviets gave the SS after The Great Patriotic War?)

******.

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 4, 2023
August 4, 2023
Rybar

This morning, Ukrainian unmanned boats attacked the port infrastructure and ships of the Black Sea Fleet in Novorossiysk . Unfortunately, one of the vehicles reached its target and hit the left side of the Olenegorsky miner large landing ship . The ship received significant damage, but is still fit for repair.

In addition, at night, UAV drones made another raid on the Crimea . One of the main targets was Feodosia , where Russian air defense and electronic warfare systems neutralized up to 8 aircraft. Several UAVs were intercepted on approach near Armyansk and Krasnoperekopsk .

Meanwhile, Ukrainian formations continue to draw forces both to the Orekhovsky sector , where the clashes have subsided somewhat, and to the borders of the Kursk region . They arrived there from the so-called "Russian Volunteer Corps" with Polish mercenaries, which indicates the plans of the enemy to conduct new sorties deep into the territory of Russia.

Image

Attack of Ukrainian formations on the port infrastructure of Novorossiysk

Image
Early in the morning, two unmanned boats of the Armed Forces of Ukraine carried out an attack in the Myskhako area in the Novorossiysk port . The drones targeted oil terminals in Novorossiysk and ships of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy.

The drones themselves, apparently, left the mouth of the Danube River in the afternoon of August 3. Then, under the control of the Tekever UAV, the drones moved to the east, where they were waiting for the beginning of the UAV raid on the Crimea, which also took place at night.

It is noteworthy that at the time of the raid and attempted strike on Novorossiysk, three reconnaissance UAVs of the US Air Force and NATO Air Force (RQ-4D Phoenix, two MQ-9A Reapers) and one R-8A aircraft were in the air in the southwest of the Black Sea.

Unfortunately, before being destroyed, one unmanned boat hit the port side of the Olenegorsky miner large landing ship. As a result, one of the compartments was flooded, but the ship remained afloat and will be restored after repairs. In this case, it is curious that the drone approached the BDK without hindrance. The crew probably did not expect an attack, as a result of which they did not take measures to destroy the drone. And this also raises the issue of equipping all non-combat ships with additional machine gun mounts, as has already been done on several ships of the Black Sea Fleet.

Given the recent missile attack on Taganrog in the Rostov region and the overall goal of reducing the capabilities of the Russian Armed Forces in the Azov and Black Seas, the attempted attack on Novorossiysk once again confirms plans to strike at the port infrastructure of the Russian Federation.

Combined attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Black Sea zone

Around midnight, from the vicinity of Kherson , probably from the airfield in Chernobaevka , two to four groups of Mugin-5 PRO drones (at least 18 UAVs) were launched in the direction of the Crimean peninsula. One of the groups moved through Kalanchak to Armyansk and Cape Tarkhankut , and the other through Chaplinka and Chongar in the direction of Feodosia . The first six drones were suppressed by electronic warfare over Chaplinka. Further, units of the 31st air defense division worked on targets from the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system near Krasnoperekopsk and Cape Tarkhankut. Two more were planted by electronic warfare at Krasnoperekopsk and Armyansk.

The main enemy attack was concentrated on Feodosia, where Russian troops shot down seven UAVs (three from the S-400 air defense system, four from the ZU-23-2 anti-aircraft guns), and one was suppressed by the EWs. One of the drones fell near an oil depot in the city, there is no damage data yet. The attack on Feodosia is not accidental. Large oil reservoirs are located in this city (the fall of a UAV nearby indirectly indicates that they were the target). In addition, there is also a power plant that connects the power lines of Crimea.

The combined attack on the Crimea, along with a hit on a Black Sea Fleet ship, took place exactly after a comprehensive reconnaissance by aviation and NATO satellites. And this time, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have changed their goals: from the already familiar Sevastopol and Guards to Feodosia and Novorossiysk.

The situation on the front line and the fighting

Image
We observe very interesting enemy movements on the border of the Belgorod and Kursk regions . For about a month now, a significant contingent, including foreign mercenaries, has been in the Sumy and Kharkov regions . In addition, the other day, three sabotage groups of special operations forces of Ukraine were transferred to Pokrovka and Slavgorod , located right on the "ribbon".

The transfer of vyruses from the so-called "Russian Volunteer Corps" (RDK) is again noted: three DRGs, diluted with therodefense and MTR, arrived in Bely Kolodez in the Kharkov region. Two more detachments of the RDK and the "Polish Volunteer Corps" were transferred to Belokopytovo and Starikovo - settlements on the border with the Kursk region.

Judging by the very active movements to the border of the Russian Federation and the appearance of various formations of mercenaries, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are planning regular attacks on Russian territories. If we take into account the accumulation of attack drones by Ukrainian troops along the front line, then on the eve of such attacks or simultaneously with them, a massive UAV raid deep into Russia can be expected.


In the Starobelsk direction, Russian troops continue offensive operations. Fierce battles are going on in the Novoselovsky area, where the RF Armed Forces are pushing through the enemy's defenses, and on the Karmazinovsky ledge. In general, the front line has not actually changed over the past day.

On the Soledar direction, on the outskirts of Kleshcheevka, heavy fighting continues with superior enemy forces. Due to heavy losses among the Ukrainian formations, the pressure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in this area has slightly decreased, which allows the tankers of the RF Armed Forces, under the cover of UAV operators, to work from closed firing positions against the manpower dug in the trenches.

In the Vremievsky sector, fighting continues in the Staromayorsky area . The enemy is trying to push our troops out of Urozhaynoye , which will make it possible to level the front line in this direction. At the same time, the village is vulnerable to flank attacks from the east due to the terrain, which makes its defense a difficult task.

Image
At the Orekhovsky site, the situation is still without major changes. Mutual shelling continues along the front line. But, looking at what the Ukrainian formations are doing, we can assume that the active phase will resume soon. Evacuation groups equipped with wheeled armored vehicles began to move to the front line along the LBS to evacuate the dead and wounded from the battlefield. Personnel are being actively discharged from hospitals and medical institutions. This indicates preparations for intense combat operations.

The other day, a meeting was held with the commander of the assault units, at which the forces of the Marun tactical group , including 71 jaeger brigades, also took part . 71 EBR completes combat coordination at the training ground in Upper Tersa . Today, information appeared about the imminent transfer from the 199th Zhytomyr training center of the UAV strike company after training.

Also, in the interception of negotiations between members of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a rather curious message was reported that foreign journalists had been in custody at the positions of the 56th rifle battalion for two weeks, covering the failures of Ukrainian formations in the offensive. The reliability of the information is in question - it may well be a front-line bike and " elephant radio" . However, against the backdrop of dissatisfaction with the Kyiv authorities with an inconvenient picture in the media, which seeps through powerful military censorship, one should not exclude the possibility of this.


Significant changes have not occurred in the Kherson direction , but the enemy does not abandon attempts to occupy the " neutral" islands in the Golopristan sector , battles and artillery duels do not subside.

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas

Image
Ukrainian formations continue shelling the border areas of the Bryansk region. It is reported about the ignition of an outbuilding in the village of Sluchovsk . There were no casualties.

Image
In the Belgorod region, local residents reported arrivals in the village of Vyazovoe , there is no information about the destruction and victims.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine continued to terrorize the civilian population of the Donetsk People's Republic . Arrivals were recorded in the Kirovsky, Kuibyshevsky and Petrovsky districts of Donetsk . The main blow, as usual, fell on civilian infrastructure and residential buildings, one person was injured. In addition, Gorlovka, Makeevka, Yasinovataya and Yelenovka were under fire during the day . In total, the enemy fired about two hundred shells.

At night, the Armed Forces of Ukraine attempted to attack the infrastructure of Berdyansk with drones . Russian air defense crews shot down five enemy attack drones on the outskirts of the city and over the Sea of ​​Azov, there were no casualties or damage. In just 24 hours, the Armed Forces of Ukraine fired 65 times at the border settlements of the Zaporozhye region .

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine launched a series of attacks on the settlements of the Kherson region . New Kakhovka, Aleshki, Kakhovka, Gornostaevka and Korsunka were hit . In Nova Kakhovka, as a result of shelling, a civilian object was destroyed in the territory of the garden named after. Solodukhin. In Aleshki, a center for issuing humanitarian aid for flood victims was hit by a drone at night.

Political events
On the agro-complex of Ukraine after the end of the Grain Deal

According to Bloomberg , Ukrainian companies began to reduce winter crops after Russia withdrew from the grain deal and began to strike at Ukraine's port infrastructure. In fact, the use of some areas for crops becomes unprofitable due to extremely low grain prices. In the future, it is expected that this will lead to a reduction in revenues to the Ukrainian budget in the amount of up to two billion dollars.

On Polish-Ukrainian relations

Ukraine and Poland summoned each other's ambassadors to the Foreign Ministry. The stumbling block was the accusations of the Poles in the "ungratefulness" of the Ukrainians for the assistance provided by the neighboring republic. For Ukraine, it is critical that Poland restricts the import of Ukrainian grain, which, against the backdrop of the cancellation of the "grain deal", was another blow to the country's budget.

Detentions of Ukrainian military commissars

In Ukraine, the hunt for unscrupulous employees of military registration and enlistment offices continues. The Odessa Territorial Recruiting Center said that they sent three employees to help draft dodgers to avoid being drafted for money, they were sent to the front.

In addition, the head of the Donetsk Regional TCC was detained , who issued increased military payments to some employees. The military commissar also used his official position to help local criminals avoid trial and conscription.

Several employees were also arrested in the Poltava and Cherkasy regions.

On the meeting on Ukrainian settlement in Saudi Arabia

The network discusses the progress of the meeting in Jeddah in Saudi Arabia on the Ukrainian settlement. At the moment, there is no information about any intermediate results, the focus is on the role of China in these negotiations.

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

(Other images at link.)

******

Three Polls On Support For The War In Ukraine

There are new polls out which show the changing opinion of U.S. citizens and others about supporting the war in Ukraine.

Newsweek came first, with a very deceiving headline:

U.S. Troops Should be Sent to Ukraine, Third of Americans Say

The text describing the poll does not really support what the headline says:

A total of 31 percent of eligible voters in the U.S. support or strongly support American military forces heading to the battlefields of Ukraine, polling conducted exclusively for Newsweek by Redfield & Wilton Strategies has revealed.
A quarter of respondents neither supported nor opposed the idea of sending U.S. soldiers to Ukraine, with 34 percent against the suggestion. Just under one in ten respondents did not know.

Can anyone tell me why one would put the losing share of the opinion poll into the headline?

What is surprising, at least to me, is the huge difference of opinions between the young and the older voters:

In the poll, those identified as "Millennial," between 27 and 42 years old, were most likely to "strongly support" committing U.S. troops to Ukraine. However, more respondents aged between 18-26 (Gen Z) said they would support the measure overall, 47 percent saying they supported or strongly supported sending U.S. troops.
Nearly a third of respondents aged over 59 said they opposed pledging U.S. troops to Ukraine, with a further 25 percent "strongly" opposing the suggestion.


The pro-war Gen-Z-lers should be put through a boot camp to be shipped off to Europe. I have no doubt that it would change their opinion in no time.

In contrast to Newsweek the CNN poll pice is correctly headlined:

CNN Poll: Majority of Americans oppose more US aid for Ukraine in war with Russia

Most Americans oppose Congress authorizing additional funding to support Ukraine in its war with Russia, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS, as the public splits over whether the US has already done enough to assist Ukraine.

Overall, 55% say the US Congress should not authorize additional funding to support Ukraine vs. 45% who say Congress should authorize such funding. And 51% say that the US has already done enough to help Ukraine while 48% say it should do more. A poll conducted in the early days of the Russian invasion in late February 2022 found 62% who felt the US should have been doing more.


The CNN poll seem to contradict the one by Newsweek on the most important question:

When asked specifically about types of assistance the US could provide to Ukraine, there is broader support for help with intelligence gathering (63%) and military training (53%) than for providing weapons (43%), alongside very slim backing for US military forces to participate in combat operations (17%).

There is a strong partisan divide about supporting the war:

Within both parties, there are splits by ideology. On providing additional funding, liberal Democrats are far and away the most supportive, 74% back it compared with 51% of moderate or conservative Democrats. Among Republicans, about three-quarters of conservatives oppose new funding (76%) compared with 61% of moderate or liberal Republicans.

Independents mostly say the US has done enough to help Ukraine (56%) and that they oppose additional funding (55%).


The progressives in the U.S., like the Greens in Europe, are now the fringe that is most eager to pursue the war. They are, of course, also those who are the least eager to serve in the military.

It is interesting to compare that with a change in opinion of young Poles, aged 16-34:

There has been a fundamental shift when it comes to the stance that young Poles think their government should adopt in the war in Ukraine. In 2022, an overwhelming majority of 83% argued that the government should support Ukraine – but this number has changed drastically.
Now, 65% of respondents back continuous support for Ukraine, whereas the remaining 34% wish for Poland to stay neutral. Clearly, more than one and a half years into the current phase of the conflict and amid fears of other countries being pulled into the war, young people have become more cautious.


Those numbers are a month old. It is likely that the support has sunk further and will no longer be in a majority by the end of this year.

While no poll can be trusted fully they show in aggregate that the general opinion is moving away from supporting the war.

That gives some hope that any unnecessary prolonging of the war, which some neoconservative circles seem to wish, will be met by a strong opposition.

Posted by b on August 4, 2023 at 15:07 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/08/t ... l#comments

*****

Preparatory stage
August 4, 5:14 p.m

Image

Preparatory stage

1. Putin today signed a law expanding the age range of conscription from 18 to 30 years. Proposals to make a frame 21 - 30 years old were rejected when considered in the State Duma.
2. The State Duma calls for tougher penalties for evading mobilization and conscription, up to a prison term, taking into account the experience of conducting partial mobilization in 2022. It is proposed to give up to 5 years of real term.
3. The number of contract soldiers recruited since January 2023 has already exceeded 231,000 people. In the future, the recruitment of contractors will be further intensified. Including large salaries (from 204 thousand, not counting other payments and regional bonuses like additional lifting - from 150 to 300 thousand or land).
4. The level of solving the problems mobilized by the beginning of August is about 49% according to official statistics. That is, about half of the problems that arise are solved. Not much, although there are certainly advances.
4. At the same time, General Kartapolov said that now there is no smell of new mobilization. But at the same time, he also stated that the presence of armor from mobilization is a relative thing. It will be necessary, they will call with armor, as in the Great Patriotic War. This is apparently in case the SVO is officially reclassified as a war.

Regardless of whether a new partial mobilization is announced in the autumn or not, the course to increase the size of the armed forces in the coming years seems clear. The question is more about how they will increase the size of the army, since in addition to the needs of the NMD, it is also necessary to form new armies and corps for the western and northwestern directions, as well as build up the capabilities of the Moscow and Leningrad military districts.
I believe that by mid-autumn the situation will be concretized.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8543995.html

Damage to the BDK "Olenegorsk Miner"
August 4, 8:00 p.m

Image

Satellite photos of the Novorossiysk harbor have appeared. "Olenegorsky miner" was brought to the pier, there is no threat of flooding the ship.


Work is underway to repair the damage. The sailors had a good fight for the survivability of the ship. In general, we got off relatively lightly, although the Olenegorsk Miner will have to spend some time on repairs, as we had last year with the minesweeper Ivan Golubets, which received damage to the stern during an attack by a naval drone. Since last year, "Ivan Golubets" has been performing combat missions. We are waiting for the Olenegorsk Miner to return from repair. Well, and strengthening the protection of ports, of course. The enemy will certainly try to repeat such harassing attacks, which should not be underestimated.

Image

Image

Photos taken in the first half of the day, when the BDK, which had taken in water, was taken to the pier, simultaneously pumping out water.

There are unconfirmed reports that the alleged attack was carried out by French drones as revenge for the coup in Niger. If this is true (study of the wreckage of the drone will show), then it will somehow be not enough, given that France is losing another country, moreover, the most key one. Today, the French press burst into hysteria about the fact that after negotiations between the military of Niger and the military of Mali, the new authorities of Niger began contacts with the Wagner PMC, whose forces are deployed on the territory of Mali. If this is the case, then this is, frankly, expected - Niger, the most logical location for filming the next series of the "Tourist" franchise.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8544454.html

Attack on the tanker "Sig"
August 5, 8:39 am

Image

At night, south of the Kerch Strait, a Ukrainian maritime drone crashed into a Russian tanker Sig.
Since the tanker was empty, there was no oil spill. However, the tanker received a hole and water began to flow inside. The vessel lost its course due to flooding of the engine room. There were no dead.
Now work is underway on the lining of the patch. There is no threat of sinking the ship.

The tanker is relatively new - launched in 2014. Displacement 8200 tons.

In the light of such attacks, in addition to attacks on the enemy’s port infrastructure, it would be appropriate to start destroying Ukrainian ships remaining in the ports of Odessa and Izmail. There are all possibilities for this.
You can also complain about our lagging behind NATO in the development of maritime drones, they would now be a great addition to attacks on coastal infrastructure.

From the point of view of protective measures, it is necessary to strengthen the protection of harbors and external roads, to conduct more active training of personnel (we have been doing this in Sevastopol for many months now). It is also necessary to increase the number of boats + patrol aircraft. The adversary is obviously using NATO technical intelligence to search for vulnerabilities and seeks to switch directions of attacks to achieve at least some effect. We, as usual, have a rather slow reaction, when they begin to intensify defensive measures after successful attacks by the enemy, and not before.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8545143.html

Google Translator

******

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Came to Power in Carefully Planned Operation Coordinated by Western Intelligence Services, Says Former U.S. Diplomat
By Jeremy Kuzmarov - August 4, 2023 2

Image
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with King Charles III. [Source: news.abplive.com]

Secret Meeting with British MI6 Head Richard Moore Points to the Likelihood That Zelensky Is a British Intelligence Agent
In October 2020, on a visit to London, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met with Sir Richard Moore, the head of the British intelligence service, MI6.

Image
Sir Richard Moore [Source: wikipedia.org]

The usual diplomatic protocol is for a visiting foreign head of state to meet with his counterpart, which in this case would have been Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

According to Andriy Mishin, a former employee of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, the meeting signified that Zelensky was a professional intelligence agent and that Moore was his direct handler, telling him what to do.

Since the commencement of the Special Military Operation in Ukraine, Zelensky has surrounded himself with British—not Ukrainian—security guards. Photographs captured these guards with the Ukrainian flag sewed backwards on their uniforms, which under ordinary circumstances would lead to them being shot.

When he visited the Vatican in May 2023, Zelensky snubbed Pope Francis by giving him an artifact with satanic imagery[1] and spent most of his time with a British Bishop, Paul Gallagher. Present at the meeting was Sir Richard Moore, his alleged handler.

Image
Bishop Paul Gallagher, with whom Zelensky met far longer than he did with the Pope. [Source: liverpoolecho.co.uk]

Agent Zelensky
Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter has produced a new documentary, Agent Zelensky, which details Zelensky’s relationship with Moore and MI6.

Image
Scott Ritter [Source: babello.com]

Part I of the documentary includes an interview with J. Michael Springmann, a former State Department employee at the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, who stated that Zelensky’s rise to power in Ukraine was the result of a “carefully planned operation by Western intelligence services.”

Image
J. Michael Springmann [Source: salem-news.com]

After winning April 2019 elections, Zelensky has effectively done the West’s bidding by triggering a war with Russia and using Ukrainians as cannon fodder in an attempt to induce a Vietnam type quagmire that would undermine Russia’s economy and government.

Zelensky has fulfilled his function as an agent of the West further by a) passing laws that discriminate against Russians; b) enabling foreign takeover of Ukrainian land; and c) allowing the Wall Street financial house Blackrock to dictate Ukrainian economic policies.

According to Ritter, Zelensky has transformed Ukraine into an “experimental playground” for new U.S. and Western weapons systems, neo-Nazi mercenaries, and military related research in biolabs whose existence was admitted by top State Department official Victoria Nuland.

A recent article in Newsweek points out that the CIA has shuttled weapons into Ukraine using a “gray fleet” of commercial aircraft that crisscrosses Central and Eastern Europe, sent personnel into Ukraine on secret missions, and assisted Ukrainians with new weapons, all while using Poland as its clandestine hub to coordinate its operations inside the country.

The CIA has additionally worked closely with the Ukrainian Secret Service (SBU), which, following Zelensky’s banning of 12 political parties, has carried out a Phoenix style campaign extending into Russia in which Zelensky’s opponents have been jailed, tortured and in some cases assassinated.

Image
Oleg Novikov under arrest by SBU for advocating separatism. He is one of many political prisoners in Ukraine [Source: thegrayzone.com]

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S.-UK goal has been to use Ukraine as a club to beat and weaken Russia and project Western power into Central Asia, whose control was long viewed as key to world domination.

During meetings to discuss the Minsk peace agreements, which would have resolved the Ukraine-Russia conflict by granting special status to Donbas, Zelensky basically laughed in the face of Vladimir Putin, who had agreed to implement the accords.

Since that time, Zelensky has arrogantly paraded himself in Western capitals demanding more and more weapons for use in the war against Russia that has decimated his own people and resulted in tens of thousands of deaths.

Servant of the People
Ritter’s film emphasizes how Zelensky was in essence a Manchurian candidate whose rise to power was scripted by very powerful people as if in a Hollywood movie.

From 2015 to 2019, Zelensky starred in the Ukrainian television drama “Servant of the People,” in which he played a high school teacher, Vasyl Petrovych Holoborodko, whose monologue against corruption catapults him to fame and then the presidency of Ukraine.

Image
Zelensky following the script—with “Servant of the People,” as he does today. [Source: nytimes.com]

In Zelensky, Ukrainians believed that they were electing a clone of Holoborodko.

However, they were largely unaware at the time of Zelensky’s close ties to Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kholomoisky, who owned Ukraine’s largest oil and gas company and bank, and bankrolled Zelensky’s political ascendancy in exchange for staying out of prison.

Zelensky was involved in fraudulent financial schemes with Kholomoisky that only came to light with the release of the Pandora Papers, which revealed that Zelensky transferred $41 million to two off-shore companies that he owned.

Image
Ihor Kholomoisky with Zelensky at Ukraine’s presidential palace. [Source: raamoprusland.ni]

This off-shore wealth enabled Zelensky to allegedly purchase a $34 million mansion in Miami, a seaside home for his parents in Israel, a $3.8 million apartment in London opposite the Sherlock Holmes Museum, and seaside resorts in Georgia and Crimea.

Image
Villa in Italy owned by a Zelensky-linked company. [Source: forums.mixedmartialarts.com]

During his 2019 presidential campaign, Zelensky paid $70,000 to an American public relations firm, Signal Group, to burnish his likeness to the character that he played in “Servant of the People.”

Zelensky’s campaign was managed by American public relations specialists Andrew Mack, Stephen Krupin, a former Obama speechwriter, and Shai Franklin.

Image
Stephen Krupin [Source: bennetlink.com]

Image
Shai Franklin [Source: ngfp.org]

There were parallels between Zelensky’s campaign and Barack Obama’s carefully choreographed 2008 campaign, in that Obama was also packaged by his handlers as an outsider who would restore integrity to government.

Like Zelensky, Obama was in reality a hollow fraud who lied about his family background, had deep ties to American intelligence, and betrayed his campaign promises—in his case, by expanding Bush’s War on Terror and displaying fealty toward large banks and financial institutions.

Image
Zelensky is Ukraine’s Obama in many ways. [Source: covertactionmagazine.com]

Zelensky’s campaign pledge to fight corruption in Ukraine was exposed as phony when his administration siphoned off money from COVID relief and cancer research funds into a massive road-building boondoggle.

Mykola Azarov, Ukraine’s former Prime Minister, said that “we thought systematic corruption under Poroshenko [Zelensky’s predecessor] couldn’t get worse, but Zelensky surpassed him; there are no standards now [and] no principles at all [in the government].”

Image
Mykola Azarov [Source: ibtimes.co.uk]

During the 2019 election campaign, Zelensky called for a cease-fire in the Donbas which had been shelled for five years after the 2014 Maidan coup. But Zelensky reneged on that pledge too and provoked the war with Russia while displaying an eagerness for Ukraine to join NATO.

According to Ritter, Zelensky’s tenure as President of Ukraine is the capstone of a decades-long plan by the U.S. and UK to remake Ukraine into a Russophobic society that could be used as a tool to weaken and destroy Russia.

Agent Zelensky quotes Victoria Nuland bragging about the U.S. spending $5 billion in Ukraine since the fall of the Soviet Union. It also discusses the presidency of Viktor Yushchenko, who came to power in a U.S.-backed color revolution after being seduced by an American woman, Kateryna, who became his wife.

Image
Victoria Nuland [Source: greanvillepost.com]

Image
Viktor and Kateryna Yushchenko [Source: dailymail.co.uk]

A key feature of Yushchenko’s presidency was his rehabilitation of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), which had collaborated with the Nazis during World War II against the Soviet Union and was supported by the CIA.

Yushchenko designated as national heroes such fascist collaborators as Stepan Bandera and Roman Shukhevych whom Zelensky has also praised.

Image
Stepan Banders, left, and Roman Shukhevych, right. [Source: kresy.pl]

Image
Viktor Yanukovych [Source: rudebutgood.blogspot.com]
In 2010, Yushchenko was defeated in elections by Viktor Yanukovych, who allied Ukraine with Russia and stripped Bandera and Shukhevych of their hero status.

Image
Memorial to victims of Odessa trade union building massacre. [Source: morningstaronline.co.uk]

This made Yanukovych a target of a U.S. regime-change operation that resulted in the 2014 Maidan coup and war in eastern Ukraine after the people of Donetsk and Luhansk provinces voted for their autonomy.

The brutality of the post-coup regime was exemplified in the violent stamping out of any resistance and massacre of trade union activists in Odessa, about which Zelensky at the time was silent.

Image
[Source: youtube.com]

Ritter points out that a significant percentage of Ukraine’s political and military elite since the 2014 Maidan coup have received training at the George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies, which helped instill in them a Russophobic outlook.

The SBU has evolved into an adjunct of the CIA, which occupies an entire floor in the SBU’s headquarters.

Image
SBU headquarters in Kyiv—where the CIA owns a floor. [Source: sott.net]

Image
[Source: timesnownews.com]

The CIA, along with British MI6, has helped manage Zelensky’s heroic image in the West, which it aimed to fortify by having him and his wife Olena appear on the cover of Vogue magazine.

According to Ritter, the CIA and MI6 also helped Zelensky in the theatrical staging of the Bucha massacre, which was blamed on the Russians but appears to have been primarily carried out by Ukraine’s neo-Nazi Azov Battalion.

Image
Scene from Bucha. [Source: hindustantimes.com]

Bucha is a good metaphor for Zelensky’s political rule which has been an optical illusion. The public was conditioned to believe in the wholesome image of Zelensky cultivated in “Servant of the People.” However, the real Zelensky is a fame-seeking social climber who has condemned his own people to hell in the service of foreign powers.


1.Zelensky was also wearing a shirt with the insignia of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) which collaborated with the Nazis against the Soviet Union in World War II. ↑

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/0 ... -diplomat/

******
Reminiscence of the Future...
Si Vis Pacem, Para Vinum © Andrei Martyanov's Blog

This And That

1. Attack on Novorossiysk. The amphibious landing ship--it is clear that a couple of water-tight compartments have been damaged and she was towed to dock, while listing to port, where she will be repaired. The rest of drones have been destroyed. Not the first time, not the last time. The repairs, meanwhile, shouldn't take too long. I think visits from Mr. Kalibr and Mr. Geranium are in store. I am also sure that CO of the landing ship will be asked about organization of the outside watch and where the nigh vision, a standard issue on ships, equipment was. It is a failure on the account of ship's command.

Image

2. Russian MoD gave the number of VSU losses (without foreign mercenaries and "advisers") and, WITHOUT VSU losses in the rear (get it?), since the start of "counteroffensive"--43,000 (in Russian). Here is the point I make constantly--MoD's data is extremely conservative and ONLY about what MoD can visually confirm. Many thousands of VSU personnel annihilated in the rear, such as bases, depots, barracks, command posts et al are not even counted in MoD losses reports. Now recall those hundreds of rear positions hit by Russian Army and you will get the idea on the scale of losses of VSU.

Here is one out of very many examples from 6th July this year--the destruction of VSU academy in Lvov (in Russian). 8 3M14 Kalibrs visited the facility which could house up to 800 personnel and parked some tanks. Those inevitable losses are NOT counted until they are confirmed (corroborated). There could have been 100 KIAs, could have been 400 KIAs. Everyone in Lvov reported huge number of ambulances. In related example--how many personnel was KIA during obliteration of Patriots? Exactly. So, this explains the count. Russia reports only what she can reasonably count and confirm and that means immediate frontline with visual identification of corpses. Plus, we don't know how many actually die in the rear after evacuation. Reports suggest a huge number and with 404 medical facilities being overwhelmed. Make your own conclusions.

3. Irina Alksnis penned a decent piece in Ria (in Russian) about Washington getting ready to throw 404 under the bus due to shifting focus in financing for Taiwan. I would say--reasonable assumption:

Китай — действительно для американцев противник номер один. То, что Штаты оказались втянуты в украинский кризис гораздо сильнее, нежели планировали, только осложняет для них ситуацию, но никак не меняет существо дела. И полноценно переключаться на азиатское направление им придется, потому что сил и ресурсов на участие в двух масштабных конфликтах у них просто физически нет. При этом Вашингтон оказался в ловушке собственной политики. Государственные системы, тем более столь гигантские, обладают колоссальной инерцией. Они очень медлительны и неповоротливы, когда встает вопрос о кардинальной смене стратегии и направления движения. Их первоначальные планы в отношении России предусматривали стремительное обрушение нашей страны, причем относительно небольшими усилиями и затратами. Вместо этого за полтора года они постепенно погрузились в конфликт куда глубже, нежели планировали и хотели.

Translation: China is indeed the number one enemy for the Americans. The fact that the United States was drawn into the Ukrainian crisis much more than planned only complicates the situation for them, but does not change the essence of the matter. And they will have to fully switch to the Asian direction, because they simply do not physically have the strength and resources to participate in two large-scale conflicts. At the same time, Washington found itself trapped in its own policy. State systems, especially such gigantic ones, have colossal inertia. They are very slow and clumsy when the question arises of a radical change in strategy and direction. Their initial plans for Russia called for the rapid collapse of our country, and with relatively little effort and expense. Instead, over a year and a half, they gradually plunged into the conflict much deeper than they planned and wanted.


Yes, just buttresses my long standing, and now hardened, point: there is no strategic assessment and planning in the US as such. Those who can do this--they are not allowed in the policy shaping and decision making circles. Unsurprising, seeing a cabal of Ivy League pseudo-academic frauds with soft degrees running the circus. So, here is your primer for Friday.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:53 pm

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 5, 2023
August 5, 2023
Rybar

On the night of Friday to Saturday, a Ukrainian unmanned boat attacked the Russian tanker Sig near the Kerch Strait , causing significant damage to it. The ship sailed from the side of the Syrian Arab Republic , where it transported oil products for the Russian Armed Forces grouping.

In the evening, the Russian Aerospace Forces launched a series of strikes on Ukrainian targets with supersonic Kinzhal missiles. One of the targets, probably again, was the airfield of the Ukrainian Air Force in Starokonstantinov in the Khmelnytsky region , the other - industrial facilities in Zaporozhye .

In the Starobelsk direction, the RF Armed Forces finally liberated Novoselovskoye , knocking out Ukrainian formations from the village. At the same time, fighting continues in the Orekhovsky sector, the Vremievsky ledge and the Kherson direction.

Image

APU attack on the Russian SIG tanker in the Kerch Strait
At night, Ukrainian unmanned boats attacked the Russian boat Sig in the Kerch Strait. The crew is alive, but the engine room was flooded. An interesting coincidence: it was the Sig tanker that was escorted by the Vasily Bykov and Sergey Kotov patrol ships a few days ago at the time of the drone attack northeast of the Bosphorus. The ship sailed from the coast of the Syrian Arab Republic , where it delivered oil products for the needs of the Russian group. Apparently, the hit on this particular tanker cannot be called an accident. Such an attack is intended not only to force Russia to return to the shameful grain deal, but also to partially jeopardize the logistical capabilities of the Russian Armed Forces in the Middle East.

In addition, Russian air defense systems shot down several flying drones in the area of ​​the Crimean bridge .

Massive strikes of the Russian Aerospace Forces on Ukrainian military facilities
In the evening, a series of explosions thundered in Ukraine: the Russian Armed Forces attacked military facilities in the country. According to some reports, the targets were industrial enterprises in Zaporozhye , as well as an airfield in Starokonstantinov , where Ukrainian aviation is based. Also, the Network reported on the flight of missiles towards the Vinnitsa region , but this information was not confirmed. According to preliminary data, the Russian Aerospace Forces worked with supersonic Kinzhals.

Unconfirmed reports about the work of air defense systems over the Kaluga and Tula regions are circulating on social networks . In fact, contrails and pops arose as a result of the work of Russian aviation on Ukrainian facilities.

The situation on the front line and the fighting
There were no changes on the front line in the Donetsk and Soledar directions . Positional battles and artillery duels continue.

Image
In the Starobelsky direction , as a result of several days of assault, Russian military personnel managed to liberate the village of Novoselovskoye , the battles for which have been going on for the past few months. There was practically nothing left of the settlement itself, most of it was in the gray zone. The Armed Forces of Ukraine held the defense on two streets in the west of Novoselovsky. After the liberation of the village, the main efforts of the RF Armed Forces should be concentrated on the northern and southern outskirts, from where the Ukrainian formations fired at Kuzemovka . Also to the south there is an important height, from which an overview of Novoselovskoye and adjacent landings opens, beyond which there are also violent clashes.

At the Vremyevsky sector, the RF Armed Forces hold positions in the area of ​​​​Urozhaynoye , the enemy is trying to enter the settlement, using the tactics of small infantry groups. During one of the attacks, the Armed Forces of Ukraine lost an armored car, after which they retreated. FPV drones and artillery are working on the Ukrainian infantry entrenched in the trenches.


There is a relative lull in the Orekhovsky area . After the losses incurred, the enemy regroups. In order to prevent this, Russian artillery and drones are working almost without interruption on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In the evening , in the Rabotino area , Ukrainian formations attempted an offensive, however, having lost several armored vehicles, they retreated.

In the Kherson direction , the situation remains stably tense: the enemy took up positions near the Antonovsky bridge and nearby buildings, but sits in the basements and does not go further to Aleshki . At the same time, Russian troops inflict fire damage on identified targets. The video shows a strike with precision-guided munitions on one of the shelters in the dacha area. It is characteristic that two drones conduct surveillance at once: one gives out target designation, the second monitors the situation near the coastline.

Nevertheless, such even accurate hits are still not enough to knock out the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the vicinity of the Antonovsky Bridge. If fire raids with ammunition norms were higher, then, perhaps, it would not have been necessary to arrange assaults last month to clear the coastline.

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas

In the Kursk region , Ukrainian formations fired at the city of Rylsk , as a result of which two administrative buildings and the Intercession Church were damaged. In addition, the Armed Forces of Ukraine carried out strikes on the border Tetkino .


In the Luhansk People's Republic, the Armed Forces of Ukraine again fired on Kremennaya , killing one civilian and injuring several more people. In addition, civilian infrastructure was seriously damaged.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine are shelling the settlements of the Donetsk People's Republic throughout the day , which led to the destruction of civilian infrastructure and casualties among the civilian population. In the Kievsky district of Donetsk, a man was injured, in Kuibyshevsky, a woman died from shrapnel wounds. As a result of shelling with rockets from the MLRS in Yasinovataya , four people were injured, several houses were destroyed. In Novopetrikovka, 1 person was hospitalized as a result of the shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In Gorlovka, a residential area is under massive shelling all day. In the Nikitovsky district, shell fragments killed a woman and wounded two men. Two more people were injured in the Central City district. Under attack including hit at home inMakeevka, Novobakhmutovka and Nikolsky . Air defense worked in Zaitsevo and Semigorye . In total, the enemy fired almost 200 shells on the territory of the Republic, making over 40 attacks.

As a result of the evening shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the DonNUET building caught fire.

Ukrainian formations continued to strike at the left bank of the Kherson region . During the night, the Armed Forces of Ukraine shelled Novaya Kakhovka, Kakhovka, Bolshaya Lepetikha, Pechanivka and Dnepryan , firing over 30 shells. In the morning, Alyoshki came under attack : two residential buildings were almost completely destroyed, one civilian was wounded.

Political events
On the talks launched in Saudi Arabia to resolve the conflict in Ukraine

By evening, a two-day meeting began in Jeddah , which is attended by almost 40 countries, including Russia's BRICS partners: China, South Africa, Brazil and India. The Russian representatives themselves were not invited. Nevertheless, there is no information about the course of the meeting on the network yet, with the exception of individual statements.

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator

*****

No Explosives Found on Rooftops of Zaporizhia Nuclear Plant

Image
A welcome sign at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. | Photo: Twitter/ @tassagency_en

Published 4 August 2023 (22 hours 1 minutes ago)

Previously, Ukrainian President Zelensky accused Russia of planning an attack against the plant, but provided no evidence to support his accusation.


On Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that its experts had found no mines or explosives on the rooftops of two reactor units and turbine halls at the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said in a statement that "following repeated requests," the agency's expert team was given "unimpeded access" on Thursday afternoon to the rooftops of Unit 3 and Unit 4 reactor buildings at the Zaporizhia plant and "could also clearly view the rooftops of the turbine halls."

Grossi said the expert team would continue its requests to visit the roofs of the other four reactor units at the facility.

On July 23, the IAEA experts stationed at the Zaporizhia plant spotted "directional anti-personnel mines on the periphery of the site."


On Friday, the IAEA chief said that experts confirmed "the mines first observed on July 23 were still in place" during an inspection on Aug. 1, but "no new mines or explosives were observed during any walkdowns over the past week."

Grossi stressed the importance of the IAEA experts being granted timely access to all areas of the Zaporizhia plant, saying that "timely, independent and objective reporting of facts on the ground is crucial to continue the IAEA's efforts to support nuclear safety and security."

"Previously, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky accused Russia of planning a terrorist attack against the core of the nuclear plant.. but provided no evidence to support his accusation," TASS recalled.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/No- ... -0014.html

******

U.S.-Led NATO Drowns Ukraine in a Bloodbath

August 4, 2023

This bloodbath is an obscenity, a vast imperial crime, with no effort at all by the U.S. and European leaders to sue for peace.

New figures indicate the Ukrainian military death toll is at least 400,000 after 500 days of conflict. The real figure may actually surpass 500,000. This is much greater than previously estimated, which was already dreadful. Yet, Washington incoherently keeps pushing the failed counteroffensive to the “last Ukrainian”.

This bloodbath is an obscenity, a vast imperial crime, with no effort at all by the U.S. and European leaders to sue for peace. Crudely put, war is a racket and the warmongers make a packet.

Not surprisingly, the actual casualty figures suffered by the Kiev regime’s military are a closely guarded secret. The NATO sponsors are also keeping a tight lip on the ghoulish losses because to do so would be an admission of the abysmal failure of their proxy war against Russia, and that would entail incurring an almighty political backlash from the Western public. Therein lies a diabolical Catch-22.

Nevertheless, despite the best efforts to conceal the carnage, up to recently several independent observers had estimated the death toll for the Ukrainian forces to be around 250,000 to 300,000 since the conflict erupted on February 24, 2022. Russian military casualties have been put at about 10 percent of those inflicted on the Ukrainian side.

New data this week, however, indicate the scale of losses for the NATO-backed Kiev regime to be much higher.

Satellite imagery cited by Intel Republic’s Telegram channel of newly dug cemeteries in Ukrainian territory suggests that at least 400,000 military personnel have died in battles with Russian forces. The graves presume individual bodies buried. In addition, not recorded are the countless dead who have been obliterated on battlefields or left to rot by Kiev regime commanders.

Another measure is gleaned from grim reports this week in the U.S. media that there have been 50,000 amputees among Ukrainian soldiers, according to the supply of prosthetic limbs from German manufacturers. Extrapolation from that figure of casualties corroborates the far higher estimate of war dead.

Consequently, in light of the amputee numbers, comparisons have been made even by the U.S. media with the level of attrition seen during World War One. The latter is notorious for its horrendous and senseless slaughter of men. The comparisons are correct but strangely glided over by the U.S. media without dwelling on what should be compelling abhorrence towards the violence.

If the battles in Ukraine have been previously called a “meat grinder”, then it would be accurate to refer to the country more as a bloodbath.

What makes this all the more criminal and despicable is that the conflict and death could have been avoided. Washington and its European NATO allies chose to ignore all appeals from Russia to negotiate a political solution to Moscow’s long-held strategic security concerns about NATO’s eastward expansion and the weaponization of the Kiev regime. Moscow’s diplomatic efforts were repudiated in December 2021, two months before hostilities escalated.

Prior to that, the weaponization of the regime went on for eight years after the CIA backed the coup in 2014 against a democratically elected president. (Which, by the way, makes a mockery of U.S. and European condemnations this week of a military coup in the West African nation of Niger. Such selective concern for legalities!)

Ever since the conflict in Ukraine erupted last February, when Russia intervened to defend its vital interests, the NATO bloc has deliberately escalated the violence with relentless arms supplies. Washington has sent up to $50 billion in military support for the Kiev regime. Britain, Germany, France, and other NATO members have likewise plied endless amounts of weapons, ranging from tanks to cruise missiles.

What’s more, the American administration of President Joe Biden has spurned any suggestion of negotiating an end to the conflict with Russia. The European leaders have slavishly followed the insanity and criminality of Washington in thwarting any diplomatic solution.

This is in spite of polls showing most American and European citizens are opposed to the continued arming of the Kiev regime. Many people in the West and around the world are rightly horrified by the slaughter and the danger of this bloodshed spilling over into an all-out war between nuclear powers, which would doubtless be catastrophic on a global scale.

The American and European media have hyped the war in Ukraine with systematic lies and falsehoods. So-called news information has become blatant war propaganda by self-declared Pulitzer prize-winning organs. The origins of the conflict have been distorted and the Nazi nature of the Kiev regime has been assiduously concealed.

Ukraine never stood a chance of victory against far superior Russian forces. Yet from the outset, the Western media indulged in the delusion that NATO was “defending democracy from Russian aggression” (brazenly inverting reality) and claiming that the NATO side would eventually win. Then the Western media promoted the next illusion of a “tide-changing counteroffensive”.

It is clear that the counteroffensive that NATO belligerently canvassed beginning in early June has turned out to be a complete and utter fiasco. Russian defenses around newly acquired territories in the Donbass and Zaporozhye region have been invulnerable to wave after wave of attack. Ukrainian military losses are estimated at around 43,000 in just the past two months alone.

The United States and its NATO partners have pushed the Kiev regime to embark on a counteroffensive that is suicidal. Without air cover and relying on infantry assaults against heavily mined terrain, the Ukrainians have been thrown into the fray like cannon fodder.

Even more damning, the American and European leaders knew that the Ukrainian counteroffensive would not succeed. Reports in the New York Times and other outlets have coyly admitted that.

The impending disaster for NATO is colossal. This calamity makes the debacle of NATO’s defeat in Afghanistan exactly two years ago this month look like a picnic in retrospect.

President Biden is seeking reelection next year and the unavoidable fact is he has blood dripping from his hands for the barbarity in Ukraine. The epic horror – which has recklessly risked nuclear war with Russia – stands as a monumental intelligence, political, military, and moral abomination for Washington and its European vassals.

This week, Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto revealed that European Union counterparts are callously calculating that the war in Ukraine may go on for another four years. Another four years! And these European leaders are willing to continue supporting the Kiev regime with up to €20 billion in additional funds because of their servile deference to Washington’s imperialist objectives. Those objectives are all about confronting Moscow to shore up waning American hegemony. Their irrational Russophobia also plays a nefarious part.

Western regimes unanswerable to their people are responsible for an epoch-making criminal war in Ukraine. Biden and his European accomplices are in a fiendish dilemma of their own making. They can’t admit defeat for the destruction and death, and so they incoherently keep insisting that Ukraine wades deeper into the bloodbath.

If there were any justice, Biden shouldn’t be facing the electorate soon. He and his Western minions, including household media organizations, should be facing prosecution for war crimes.

https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023 ... bloodbath/

******
.
“Soft Annexation”: Poland’s Plan for Western Ukraine
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 4, 2023
Şafak Erdem

Image
On July 23, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and Russian President Vladimir Putin met in Saint Petersburg. The two leaders addressed the latest situation in Ukraine, the Wagner issue and the strained relations between Belarus and Poland.

We asked Alexey Dzermant, political scientist and the Director of the Center for Research and Development of Continental Integration of North Eurasia, Minsk, about the details of the meeting, its outcomes and the current situation in Belorussian-Polish relations.
=================================================================

What did president Lukashenko and Putin address in their last meeting and is there any decisive consequence of the meeting?


In my opinion, the main topic of the meeting was security, particularly the security of the Union State and Belarus in the face of our Western neighbour Poland.

Poland’s plan for Western Ukraine

Lukashenko emphasized that the plans of the Polish elites and government to occupy Western Ukraine are not acceptable for Belarus. Having Poland as a neighbor from three different directions (south, north, and west) is seen as a significant threat by Belarus. It’s no secret that Poland has been hostile towards Belarus. Lukashenko said to Putin “We don’t support any idea such as dividing Ukraine between Russia and Poland”.

Lukashenko’s joke

Secondly Lukashenko made a joke, but I think it is not simply a joke. He said that Wagner soldiers want to visit Poland like tourists. This message was directed at the Polish and Western elites, subtly warning them that if necessary, Belarus would not hesitate to employ the Wagner group. Wagner is an effective power. And Lukashenko clearly told Putin that this power is under Belarus’s control.

“Soft annexation”

Is annexation or occupation of Western Ukraine a realistic option in the eyes of Polish elites or government? Do they really intent to do that?

It is not planned like a brutal annexation or occupation. No, they don’t want to give such an appearance of an aggressor to Ukrainian people and Western elites. Just the opposite. They want to do that in a soft form with the agreement between Polish and Ukrainian governments. The aim is to portray it as a mutual agreement rather than a forceful annexation.

The form of such a plan aside, Poland wants to control the sources and territory in Western Ukraine. To Poland, Ukraine holds a place like the lands of their dreams. Their historical memory and ideological narratives have a strong orientation towards Ukraine. In that context, Ukraine is perceived as a kind of colony for Poland.

For centuries, Polish Catholic elites fought against Ukrainians Cossacks who were Orthodox. These were brutal wars. In short, Poland has always seen Ukraine and also Belarus as parts of their empire (Rzeczpospolita). They want to revive this empire.

“The close ally” of Ukraine

Do Polish elites or government have such an expectation that Ukrainian elites or government would give a green light to such a plan? Or are they already some negotiations taking place?

We don’t know exactly the character and details of those negotiations, but we know that some negotiations exist between Zelenskiy and Duda and between other representatives.

We know that some Polish administrators can now freely engage in some activities in Ukraine to ensure equal citizenship for Polish as Ukrainians in the Ukrainian territory. This is another indicator of “soft expansion” I mentioned. I don’t think all Ukrainians are happy with this, but I am convinced that Polish politicians are telling Ukrainians “Look, the situation on the battle ground is not good for you. Your only close ally is Poland. That’s why you should listen to us and take some steps.” So Polish elites are using the miserable conditions that Ukrainians are in to expand their power in Ukrainian territory.

And what would be the gain of Ukraine in that case? Military support?

Yes, military and financial support. Ukrainian government and elites don’t believe any eternal Western help and therefore they are turning their face to Poland. Unlike the West, Ukraine is not a secondary and external question for Poland. It is one of the main components of Poland policy and regional positioning.

Three major orientations in Polish politics

Poland has strong ties to NATO. You also referred to the histrorical dimension of the question. Do you see foresee any possibility that Poland will be acting more independently from NATO?

There are some political forces in Poland to make it more independent from the US and NATO, but unfortunately they don’t have majority in the parliament and government.

The first force is the quite conservative, pro-American and anti-Russian: the government of Andrzej Duda, Mateusz Morawiecki and Jaroslaw Kaczynski.

The second are the liberals oriented towards Berlin and the EU. Donald Tusk is here.

The third one is also conservative, but they are not pro-American, rather pragmatic for a more independent Poland. Here is the Confederation party. They have only 10-12 percent support of the voters.

As sum, the strongest two forces are pro-Western, EU, NATO and anti-Russia and anti-Belarus with the first one rather pro-American and the second rather pro-EU.

The future of the Union State

What is your opinion on the future of the Union State of Belarus and Russia? It moves towards a more institutionalized form?

The economical and the military ground of the Union State became stronger. I think it’s quite good for our economy because we use Russian market to make the sanctions ineffective. It is also very good for security. In this sphere, the relations between Russia and Belarus is very close. Russian tactical nuclear weapons on our territory are a great contribution to Belarus’ security. Thanks to that we don’t have any concerns about the Polish army and other NATO armies on our Western borders.

So I can say that the Union State has a good perspective for future. It can evolve into a more institutional structure. But now our main task is to develop the cooperation in practical fields, especially the economy. Belarus managed to avoid possible negative impacts of Western sanctions.

I cannot describe what kind of an institutional form the Union State will gain in future, but at least now it has a solid base.

“Polish military forces shot thousands of refugees”

Thank you very much Dear Alexey. Is there any other point you would like to point out?

Regarding Poland remains the question of migrants from the Middle East. This question is not widely known in Western media and in Turkish media I think.[/i]

Since the relations between Poland and Belarus deteriorated with the attempted coup d’état in Belarus supported by Poland, Belarus decided not to help the European Union and Poland control their borders. Thousands of refugees are trying to go to Poland. What is important to know here is that thousands of them were shot by the Polish military forces on Polish border. Nobody in Western Europe and the European Union don’t want to investigate these crimes. We shouldn’t overlook and forget this and maybe in future we need an international court to investigate these crimes.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... n-ukraine/

(Umm, Galacia is the Uke-Nazi homeland and the scene of some of their worst war crimes against Poles. I don't see the nazis acquiescing to these schemes quietly...)

The Black Sea: A New Arena for a Global Clash
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 4, 2023
Turker Erturk

Image
Amid rising tensions in the Black Sea, Ukraine’s desire for NATO membership, diminished US global influence, and Russia facing a potential quagmire, Turkiye must assert a balanced foreign policy to avoid a global military confrontation in the strategic waterway.

On 11 July 2023, NATO issued the 90-point Vilnius Summit Communiqué, at a summit widely seen as “a historic moment for the future of European security, and Ukraine’s in particular.” The take-away: Russia’s war in Ukraine will continue.

This reaffirmed NATO’s unwavering support for Kiev, as previously pledged at the 2008 Bucharest Summit, and emphasize that “We fully support Ukraine’s right to choose its own security arrangements. Ukraine’s future is in NATO.”

The NATO Summit culminated with leaders from 31 countries making a significant announcement: Ukraine had been offered an invitation to join NATO. The catch, however, was that Ukraine was not yet deemed ready for membership; “We will be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the Alliance when Allies agree, and conditions are met,” it read. This has left the international community wondering about the timeline and specifics of Ukraine’s eventual participation in the Altanticist alliance.

US avoiding a global hot war

But beneath the surface, strategic machinations seem to be at play. Ukraine finds itself in a complex position: While NATO appears to be stalling Kiev’s membership, it simultaneously urges Ukraine to pursue its aspirations. The reason becomes apparent upon closer inspection: Ukraine’s entry into NATO could potentially ignite a larger conflict, the NATO-Russia War, which could spiral into World War III, and the ominous specter of nuclear weapons looms large.

Europe, particularly key players like Germany and France, hesitate to give the green light for Ukraine’s NATO accession. The US, too, has its reservations at this stage, as it seeks to avoid a global hot war. Instead, Washington aims to recalibrate its global stance, moving away from a previous globalization effort that failed to benefit its interests and inadvertently bolstered China.

The US appears to be opting for a long-term strategy, engaging in a war of attrition with Russia, thereby escalating a Second Cold War that was set in motion during the Donald Trump era, although his was more focused on Beijing.

In this intricate geopolitical dance, it appears unlikely that Ukraine will join NATO anytime soon. Equally, Russia may not meet the stringent requirements outlined in the Vilnius Summit’s communiqué. As a result, the war is set to endure.

Remarkably, the Ukraine War has already surpassed 17 months, and the parallels with the Soviet Union’s nine-year protracted conflict in Afghanistan are eerily striking. This war looms large for Moscow, with a much wider front to contend with. Barring significant improvements, it could span another 5 years or even longer – a timeline that seems to align with the US’s likely plan.

NATO expansion and Russia’s military challenges

The US may be banking on a shift in power or regime change within Russia during this protracted conflict. The continuous strain of a war economy on Moscow may eventually lead to public discontent, furthering internal turmoil.

To maintain its military manpower, Russia has even raised the maximum military conscription age from 27 to 30, highlighting the challenges faced in assembling a large pool of trained soldiers. This is why mercenary structures like Wagner are needed, even if they pose challenges themselves.

Meanwhile, the west, especially Europe, grapples with its own set of socio-economic problems. Escalating living costs, surging energy prices, inflation, economic contractions, an influx of Ukrainian refugees, rising unemployment, and growing public dissent against the war paint a grim picture.

France has experienced uprisings that nearly resemble a civil war, while Germany’s decision to distance itself from Russian energy has dealt a severe blow to its industries and economy.

Amidst all this, the US appears to be the sole benefactor in the ongoing conflict. Safeguarding its interests without risking the lives of its soldiers, the US deftly maneuvers in a global struggle. Through its actions, it both challenges Russia and strengthens NATO and Europe behind its cause.

Defense budgets of NATO countries are soaring, its arms and energy sector are revitalized, and its market share expands, culminating in an anti-Russian stronghold in the Baltic Sea, even securing the involvement of Finland and Sweden on NATO’s Northern flank.

Shifts towards multipolarity

Despite this, the US has faced challenges to its global hegemony. The situation in West Asia and China’s expanding influence are just a few examples of the changing dynamics. Traditional allies like Saudi Arabia are seeking cooperation with Beijing through projects like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), while Iran maintains resilience despite sanctions, forging ties with Persian Gulf states such as Qatar and the UAE.

Russia and Saudi Arabia’s increasing energy collaboration further underscores the shifting landscape, while India defiantly continues to buy weapons from Russia. These developments are contributing to a natural evolution towards multipolarity, with various countries asserting their interests and pursuing independent paths.

Efforts to reduce the reliance on the US dollar are indicative of this trend. Nonetheless, the US remains committed to fighting this struggle to preserve its global leadership and hegemony, aware that time may be working in China’s favor.

One notable development occurred on 22 July, 2022, when Russia, Ukraine, and the UN signed the “Black Sea Grain Iniative” with Turkiye’s mediation. The goal was to facilitate the safe export of cereals, foodstuffs, ammonia, and fertilizers from Ukrainian ports.

Simultaneously, Russia signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the UN Secretariat to support the sale of Russian food and fertilizer products to global markets. However, due to embargoes, SWIFT and insurance barriers, Russia was unable to export any grain and fertilizer.

But Russia withdrew from the agreement one year later. It turned out that in Africa, the claim that people are at risk of starving because Ukraine can’t access grain is not true. Only 12 percent of the grain exported from Ukraine in a year was sent to the continent, and 40 percent was instead directed to Europe.

Turkiye’s geopolitical tightrope

Turkiye, although a NATO member, has tried to maintain a relatively neutral stance since the start of the Ukraine War. This policy was influenced by several factors, including Ankara’s geopolitical position, energy dependence on Russia, trade relations, and Moscow’s support during a time when President Recep Tayyip Erdogan faced isolation from the west.

Under Erdogan, Turkiye has played a vital role in maintaining channels for Russia during the conflict, initially causing concern among US officials. However, the US eventually acknowledged Turkiye’s role as part of its long-term strategy for a war of attrition. Nevertheless, Washington remains cautious, knowing that it could potentially close such channels through various means if needed in the future.

The situation following Russia’s withdrawal from the Black Sea grain deal has the potential to significantly impact grain prices and food supply. As tensions rise in the Black Sea region, the NATO-Ukraine Council’s meeting on the security situation indicates that the waters may become increasingly heated in the weeks and months ahead.

The US and NATO are expected to play a more active role in the southern flank and the Black Sea, making it crucial for Turkiye to exercise caution and vigilance regarding these developments and the potential moves of the US and NATO in relation to the Ukraine War and the Black Sea.

Strategic options for Black Sea grain security

Considering possible moves of the US and NATO in the Black Sea and their potential demands from Turkiye, the following options are conceivable:

Option 1: Turkiye, with the largest naval power in the Black Sea, could form a maritime task group to protect ships carrying grain from Ukrainian ports to the Bosphorus Strait for international markets. This task group would be guarded against Russian submarine, surface, and air threats with intelligence support from NATO. While this option does not violate the Montreux Straits Convention, it may still lead to confrontation with Russia and provoke Russian intervention in response to the naval task group’s presence.

Option 2: Another possibility is a naval task force led by Tukiye and involving Bulgaria and Romania to safeguard ships transporting grain from Ukrainian ports in the Black Sea to the Bosphorus against potential Russian submarine, surface, and air threats. Like the first option, this approach avoids direct violation of the Montreux Straits Convention but carries the risk of escalating tensions and inviting Russian intervention in the task group’s operations.

Option 3: Alternatively, NATO could deploy a naval task group, including one or two US aircraft carriers, to protect grain shipments in the Black Sea. This formidable force might deter President Vladimir Putin from intervening, given the potential consequences of such action. However, this option would irreversibly breach the Montreux Straits Convention, necessitating a new agreement to regulate maritime passage through the Turkish straits.

Preserving the Montreux Straits Convention

During the First Cold War, the Montreux Straits Convention’s restrictions on the presence of warships from non-littoral states prevented the Black Sea from becoming a theater of confrontation between superpowers. This provided Turkiye with the opportunity to pursue a balanced foreign policy, which would have been challenging in a volatile and heavily militarized region.

Given the importance of the Convention, Ankara should resist attempts to undermine it and avoid actions that may escalate tensions and conflicts in the strategic waterway, possibly leading to a global war. Instead, Turkiye should advocate for reaching agreements and maintaining dialogue with Russia to ensure the smooth transfer of regional grain to the international market through the Black Sea.

Despite economic difficulties and pressure for short-term gains, Turkiye should prioritize long-term stability and peace in the region. It is essential to protect critical infrastructure, such as natural gas pipelines, from potential sabotage attempts, as they are vital for the country’s energy security. As such, Ankara should develop comprehensive plans and strategies to safeguard its interests, including exploration, surveillance, and monitoring activities in the air, on the surface, and underwater.

Ultimately, Turkiye’s approach to regional challenges should be guided by foresight, diplomacy, and a commitment to maintaining the Black Sea as a zone of peace and cooperation. By doing so, Turkiye can continue to play a crucial role in fostering stability and security in this strategically significant region.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... bal-clash/

The Road to Rabotino: Ukraine’s Highway to Hell
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 5, 2023
Scott Ritter

Image

On a normal summer’s day, the road to Rabotino would be empty, save for the odd combine tractor and the vehicles driven by farmers and their families as they tend to the fields of crops they had planted in spring.

The summer’s heat would reflect off the horizon, creating glimmering mirages, while the still air would echo with the chirping of birds and the buzzing of insects. On a normal summer’s day, the road to Rabotino would resemble paradise.

Today, the road to Rabotino can best be described as a highway to hell: the serene landscape scarred with craters made by artillery shells, bombs, and mines. Fields that once grew crops intended to feed the world now seem to produce another crop—the torn, burned-out hulks of Ukrainian tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and other military vehicles of all shapes and sizes.

The air buzzes not with bees, but bullets, and the sky above is torn by the sound of shells passing overhead, on their way to their intended target, often consisting of a new crop of military metal waiting to be consumed by fire. The smell of fresh soil, young crops, and flowers of the field has been replaced by the fetid stench of rotting corpses, abandoned by their comrades who fled for their lives.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has assessed that, since the Ukrainian counteroffensive began in early June, the Ukrainian Army has suffered some 43,000 casualties, with more than 4,900 pieces of equipment, including 1,831 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles (among which are included 25 German-made Leopard tanks and 21 US-made M-2 Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles) having been destroyed.

Russian casualties, while unspecified, have been alluded to by President Putin, who stated that the kill ratio was 10:1 in Russia’s favor. That equates to 4,300 casualties: the brutal blade of war cuts both ways.

The casualties suffered by Ukraine roughly align with the casualties suffered by German forces during their offensive operations against the Soviet Army in the battle of Kursk, fought in the month of July and August 1943. The Kursk battle was one of the largest during the Second World War.

This should give one an idea of the scope and scale of the violence which has transpired in and around the village of Rabotino, and elsewhere in the Zaporozhye and Donetsk regions where Ukraine and Russian forces are confronting one another.

When an army suffers a defeat of the scope and scale of that suffered by Ukraine near Rabotino, and in other fields and villages across the line of contact with Russia, it is normally incumbent upon the leadership of the defeated forces to ascertain the reasons why the defeat occurred, and then to undertake remedial action to correct the problems identified.

It came weeks after being on the receiving end of criticism from their erstwhile allies and partners in NATO, who provided Ukraine with both the material used to equip the Ukrainian Army, and training on how this equipment was to be used in battle against the Russians.

According to NATO, the Ukrainians were not using the tactics taught to them in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, and as such failed to make best use of the equipment that had been provided to them for this offensive.

From the Ukrainian perspective, however, the blame is cast back on NATO for providing Ukraine with a plan of action, but not providing the tools necessary to successfully implement the plan. While the Ukrainian military did receive most, if not all (or in some cases, more) of the 300 tanks, 500 infantry fighting vehicles, and 500 artillery pieces it had said were required for a successful counterattack designed to throw Russian forces from the former Ukrainian territories of Kherson, Zaporozhye, Donetsk, and Lugansk that were annexed by Russia in September 2022 following a referendum on joining Russia—as well as Crimes, which Russia annexed back in 2014—the Ukrainians did not receive the artillery ammunition or modern F-16 fighter aircraft it had requested.

The failure of the Ukrainian counteroffensive, according to the Ukrainian leadership, was directly attributable to the inability of Ukraine to suppress Russian artillery and airpower, both of which, when combined with the extensive use by Russia of mines in preparing their defenses, prevented the Ukrainians from achieving their goals and objectives outlined for the operation, namely to break through the Russian defenses and capture the city of Melitopol, thereby severing the land bridge connecting Crimea to Russia.

But the reality is that the Ukrainian counteroffensive was never going to work, under any circumstance. First and foremost, the Ukrainian Army is not the same military force that existed when the Special Military Operation began in February 2022. That army was largely destroyed in the fighting that raged from February through June 2022.

Thanks to tens of billions of NATO-provided equipment, and billions more in financial and training support, Ukraine was able to rebuild its army, which it used to good effect in the fall of 2022, driving Russian forces out of the Kharkov region and from the right back of the Dnieper River.

But this victory came with a heavy price tag, and NATO and Ukraine were compelled to build a third army, consisting of the equipment requested by Ukraine, and some 60-90,000 Ukrainian troops who were trained by NATO. It is this army that is being sacrificed on the road to Rabotino today.

Most of the troops that comprised this new army had little or no prior military experience. They received approximately three weeks of training on military fundamentals, before being trained on the operation (and maintenance) of the new NATO weapons they would be using.

Then they spent a few weeks carrying out field exercises designed to simulate an attack on the Russian defenses using complex “combined arms” tactics taught by NATO and American instructors. After this, they were shipped back to Ukraine and sent on the road to Rabotino.

The reduction of a prepared defensive line is one of the most complicated tasks one can assign a military unit in combat. To successfully execute this mission, the assault forces need to be masters of their craft, operating as part of a combined arms team capable of suppressing enemy forces, and breaching minefields while maneuvering under fire.

This is a task that experienced units with years of training under their belts would have difficulty pulling off. For an army like Ukraine’s third-generation force, this was a mission impossible, something every NATO trainer involved in preparing the Ukrainian forces would have known.

The massacre that occurred along the road to Rabotino was unavoidable so long as Ukraine and their NATO masters believe that the conflict with Russia can be resolved through force of arms. The problem is that the disparity between the quality and quantity of forces deployed by Ukraine and their western supporters on the one side, and Russia on the other, is too wide to be bridged by any combination of training and equipment NATO might be able to provide.

There is no magic weapon available to the West that can change the reality on the battlefield in and around Rabotino. Neither F-16’s and/or ATACMS can alter this reality. Nor is there a magic wand that can be waved over the battlefield to change the qualitative issues regarding the Ukrainian soldiers, who arrive on one of the most technologically advanced—and lethal—battlefields in modern history with little or no training.

The Ukrainian generals responsible for giving the orders to the Ukrainian Army, and the NATO trainers who prepared them for battle, knew that the outcome that is transpiring along the road to Rabotino was inevitable.

The harsh fact is that tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers and billions of dollars of western military equipment have been sacrificed not for viable military purposes, of which there are none, but rather to assuage the political needs of Ukraine’s leaders, who needed to be seen as being willing to make use of the training and material support provided, and their US and NATO masters, who needed to be able to point to battlefield successes in Ukraine to justify the diversion of their respective national treasury and military arsenal to the Ukrainian cause.

The road to Rabotino is paved with the detritus of western hubris, manifested in the flesh and blood of the Ukrainian Army scattered amongst the destroyed material produced by the defense industries of the collective West. This battle had only one possible ending, which has come to pass.

But the real tragedy is that neither Ukraine nor the collective West have absorbed the lessons that they were taught by the Russian Army—that the conflict in Ukraine can only end in a Russian victory. Sadly, many thousands of more Ukrainian soldiers, and tens of billions of dollars more of western military equipment, will need to be sacrificed before this lesson is finally driven home.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... offensive/

*****
$200 billion offensive
August 6, 13:48

Image

The results of the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Zaporozhye at the cost of 200 billion dollars from June 4 to August 6.
Let me remind you that according to the original plan, a breakthrough to Melitopol, Mariupol and Berdyansk was supposed.
In fact. they gnawed off only part of the Vremievsky ledge, and even then not all of it. In the Melitopol direction, sadness and pain.
In order to do something about this, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have another 3-4 weeks and the remaining reserves, which has already been expressed in the water in the battle of the units of the 10th strategic reserve corps. However, the brigades on the "Strykers" and "Challengers" are still holding on, against the background of the beating of the brigades on the "Leopards" and "Bradleys".

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8548483.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Mon Aug 07, 2023 11:56 am

The "success" of sanctions
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/07/2023

Image

With the same arrogance with which the Ukrainian officers referred to the certain victory of the great offensive that they were preparing for this spring-summer, the West took the success of the blitzkrieg for granted that he was preparing against Russia in the event of an invasion of Ukraine. In the weeks leading up to February 24, after Washington, Brussels and London had made clear their intention not to negotiate with Russia the security guarantees it sought from NATO, the promise of the most powerful sanctions ever known was their main threat. Representatives like Josep Borrell even promised the destruction of the Russian economy. Once the invasion of Ukraine was complete, the West quickly activated its main coup, prepared for some time, and which was actually its main bet: cutting off Russia's access to the SWIFT international payment system, although with enough nuances so as not to completely lose the economic relationship and being able to continue acquiring Russian gas.

That lesser evil was especially necessary for Germany, which would not have been able to overcome a sudden cut off of access to the main source of energy for its mighty industry. The measure had to be temporary and the European countries would immediately begin to look for substitutes to definitively abandon the addiction to reliable, cheap and accessible Russian gas, which had been one of the foundations of German competitiveness. A year and a half after the voluntary resignation of Russian energy, Russian liquefied gas continues to be one of the main sources of energy and refined oil reaches the European Union through third countries such as India above the ceiling set by the G7 as the maximum price at which Russia could trade its products. To avoid vetoes, especially that of the acquisition of oil through pipelines, Moscow has opted for the path experienced by other sanctioned countries such as Iran: the creation of a fleet of old cargo ships with which it sells oil in the open sea, a measure criticized by the West as dangerous and capable of causing natural disasters. Curiously,ecocide to the Russian enemy.

In reality, the most painful move for Russia was not the loss of a large part of the European energy market, which until then was the main and priority destination for its gas and oil, but something that, surprisingly, was unexpected for them. Although the recent precedent for the UK's act of modern piracy with the confiscation of Venezuela's gold reserves should have been a wake-up call for Russia, Moscow did not expect its public and private funds abroad to be frozen. . However, this measure has not achieved the expected objectives either. The confiscation of private assets, mainly those of oligarchs, has not achieved the expected dissidence and defections, nor the direct pressure of the oligarchy on the Kremlin that was seeking the measure.

A year and a half after the introduction of the main package of sanctions, the United States and the United Kingdom and the European Union periodically renew the validity of their measures and try to include more sectors or more people - both Russian and Belarusian - on their lists of sanctions. For some time, it has been possible to present events such as the departure from Russia of large companies, mainly commercial ones, as a success of the policy of sanctions and ideological pressure on brands to abandon the market of the aggressor State .. Comparing the images to the lines of people waiting to try the first McDonald's to open in Moscow in the early years of Yeltsin's neoliberal Russia, the West boasted that even the fast-food chain was leaving the country. Other franchises and major brands have also done so, many of which continue to sell their products through third countries. Coca-Cola from the Middle East has reached not only Moscow, but even Donetsk and other places in Donbass. Neither in the commercial veto has it turned out to be a great achievement.

Although less relevant in absolute economic terms, the exodus of Western cultural products from Russia, which has lost access, for example, to major Hollywood releases, can be considered more successful. Moscow is trying to navigate around that veto via Armenia in order to get Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer released. This loss of Western commercial products has not led to a search for national and international alternatives to Western culture, dominant in capitalist Russia since 1991, but has led Dmitry Medvedev to recommend piracy. Of course, renouncing to release and promote cinema and television in Russia means giving up a tool for the westernization of Russian society that is possibly more effective than the confiscation of the oligarchy's funds abroad.

As on the military front, also on the economic offensive, discourse has been more important than reality. The European Union and the United States have boasted about the results of their sanctions and have repeatedly claimed their success, something that can only be considered partially true in the case of energy products. The objective of the sanctions could not be to prevent the sale of Russian gas or oil, since eliminating one of the main energy sources from the market would have caused a price shock in the global market, directly and irreversibly affecting those countries with higher needs, that is, the largest consumers, with the European Union and the United States among them. The aim of the sanctions was to force the countries of the European Union to give up Russian oil and gas in favor of more ideologically correct options such as Qatar, Azerbaijan or liquefied gas from the United States, to guarantee Russia's loss of its most lucrative market. . Russia has ceased to be the reference energy source and has been forced to redirect its flows towards the Asian market, hitherto secondary, but the increase in prices has offset the losses in Europe, where despite everything it still maintains a presence relevant. Even in this sense, the success of the sanctions is not complete.

During this time, leading establishment media such as Foreign Policy have come to argue that the figures given by the Russian executive, which proved that the Russian economy had not only not collapsed but had weathered the storm of sanctions with greater solvency than the expected, they were simply not credible. Inventing an alternate reality in which the makeup of the data, which no doubt also exists in the Russian administration, explains the facts is easier than admitting that the sanctions policy has failed to defeat the Russian economy or that its effect has been limited by the refusal of the rest of the world to join a unilateral economic offensive by the United States.

Now, the World Bank and other Western sources confirm something that was already evident on a daily basis: the result of the Western sanctions is similar to that of the Ukrainian offensive. Russia has suffered damage, but Western goals have not been met. According to the latest World Bank report, Russia is the fifth largest economy in the world in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), surpassing even Germany, the former economic engine of the European Union, which now considers that an economic plan will be necessary to achieve an energy transition without ruining your industry. “The West attacked the Russian economy. The result is another dead end,” headlined The Wall Street Journal this week.in one more of the many articles that already assume that the surprise attack on the economic front has not turned out to be as effective as expected. The Russian economy contracted 2.1% in 2022, a substantial damage that undoubtedly affected the lives of the population, but a bearable result considering that, as the article admits, "Russia became the most sanctioned among all the relevant economies of the world. The IMF data confirm the recovery. "Last week, the International Monetary Fund delivered hopeful news for the Kremlin, saying it now expects the Russian economy to grow by 1.5% this year on the back of extensive government spending." Unlike Ukraine, which has used the war situation to further its ultra-liberal reforms,

“Behind Russia's economic resilience,” the article explains, “is significant government stimulus, a turn to the war economy and an unprecedented redirection of its trade to Asian partners, primarily China and India, experts say ”. The loss of the ability of the United States to force other major economies to submit to its unilateral sanctions policy has provided the Russian economy with a lifeline that the West does not seem to have foreseen.

The Western response, on the other hand, can be considered predictable. “The Biden administration argues that sanctions are vital in increasing the price Russia pays for its war in Ukraine. The latest growth statistics mask the real damage the economy is feeling, a senior administration official said. With the failed sanctions policy as the only tool in its hand, the only answer is to doubt even the data from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, whatever it takes to avoid having to admit that Washington's ability to impose unilateral sanctions against a great economy begins to be limited.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/07/el-ex ... more-27877

Google Translator

******

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 6, 2023
August 6, 2023
Rybar

This afternoon, Ukrainian formations launched strikes with Storm Shadow cruise missiles on the Chongarsky and Thin automobile bridges between Crimea and the Kherson region . One man was injured. Such strikes will continue further: the Armed Forces of Ukraine are thus trying to disrupt the supply of the Russian Armed Forces grouping on the southern front.

In addition, Ukrainian formations launched a new attack on Moscow , but this time unsuccessfully: an enemy drone was shot down on approach to the capital near Podolsk . Also, the Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to terrorize the civilian population in the new regions of Russia and the border regions of the country with shelling.

At the front, the enemy is active in the Soledar and Zaporozhye directions. Armored groups of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with tanks and light equipment attacked in the Berkhovka area west of Bakhmut , on the Vremievsky ledge and near Rabotino in the Orekhovsky sector. In general, the situation has somewhat stabilized.

Meanwhile, in Saudi Arabia, negotiations continue to resolve the conflict without the participation of Russia. According to the American edition of The Wall Street Journal, this time the Ukrainian side did not insist on the so-called " Zelensky formula " , which implies the complete withdrawal of Russian troops from the territories that Ukraine considers its own.

Image

APU strikes on bridges between Crimea and Kherson region

Image
In the afternoon, the Armed Forces of Ukraine launched a strike with Storm Shadow cruise missiles on the bridge across the Tonkiy Strait and the Chongar bridge. A fire broke out on the gas pipeline adjacent to the Tonky Bridge, and a civilian who was driving across the bridge at the time of the impact was also injured. Due to damage to the gas pipeline, more than 20,000 residents of Genichesk were left without gas. Land communication with Crimea has not been interrupted, the border checkpoints of Armyansk and Perekop are working in an enhanced mode.

Thus, Ukrainian formations are trying to disrupt the supply of the Russian Armed Forces in Zaporozhye and the Kherson region. A similar tactic was used by the Armed Forces of Ukraine before the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kherson in October last year: then the enemy regularly attacked the Antonovsky and Darevsky bridges across the Dnieper.

The situation on the front line and the fighting
After the capture by the Russian forces of Novoselovsky in the Starobelsk direction, the enemy makes unsuccessful attempts to counterattack, incurring losses in personnel and equipment.

In the Berkhovka area north of Bakhmut , the enemy tried to attack the positions of the RF Armed Forces with a column of ten pieces of equipment. Four tanks and six armored combat vehicles were destroyed by artillery strikes. The surviving infantry took refuge in the landings in an attempt to evacuate.

By evening, according to the Archangel Spetsnaz report , the Armed Forces of Ukraine made another attempt to attack with several tanks and infantry fighting vehicles. Two tanks and one infantry fighting vehicle were destroyed by anti-tank systems, the infantry was also dispersed over the landings after losses. In addition, the difficult situation persists in Kleshcheevka , where the enemy continues to put pressure on Russian servicemen.

Ukrainian formations carried out new attacks on Urozhaynoye , the attack attempt was unsuccessful. The enemy also made several attacks near Staromayorsky . In general, the situation in the area has somewhat stabilized, but the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine continues to pull more and more new forces to the front line.


On the Orekhovsky sector of the front, the enemy carried out another attack on Rabotino . Russian artillery was able to stop the attack, putting to flight the advancing personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The RF Armed Forces are actively using attack drones in the sector, regularly hitting equipment both on the front line and in the rear. In addition, in Pyatikhatki , an artillery strike hit the command post of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas
Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin announced the interception of a UAV on approach to the capital. At about 11 a.m., air defense forces destroyed an air target in the Podolsk region . Earlier, information appeared on the network about the closure of Vnukovo Airport, several dozen flights for departure and arrival were delayed.

Image
Ukrainian formations continue shelling the border regions of Russia. In the Rylsky district of the Kursk region, the village of Kuliga fell under enemy fire . Three households were damaged, a school, one car and a tractor were damaged. There were no victims or injured.

Image
In the Bryansk region, air defense worked. According to Governor Bogomaz, two aircraft-type UAVs were destroyed over the Karachevsky region . There were no casualties or damage.

Image
The shelling of the Belgorod region continues . Under the fire of the Ukrainian formations Murom and Repyahovka , there is no official information about the destruction and casualties. In addition, messages about the operation of air defense were replicated on the network.

Image
The daily shelling of the Donetsk agglomeration continued . Residential and private houses and infrastructure facilities were damaged. The enemy fired from NATO-caliber artillery, nine civilians were injured. Five men and two women were injured in the Kuibyshevsky district of Donetsk, two more men in the Kirovsky district and Staromikhaylovka.

At night, Ukrainian formations fired from the HIMARS MLRS at a bakery in Tokmak . The building was partially destroyed, but the victims and victims were avoided.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to terrorize the civilian population of the left bank of the Kherson region . Today alone, the enemy fired more than 50 cannon artillery shells at Novaya Kakhovka , Kakhovka , Gornostavka Solontsy and Aleshki . As a result of the shelling in Gornostaevka, two civilians were killed.

Political events
About the talks in Jeddah


In Saudi Arabia, the first day of negotiations on a peaceful settlement of the conflict in Ukraine ended, to which a delegation from Russia was not invited . The conference is attended by representatives of more than 30 countries, including the US , UK , India and others. Following the results of the first day of discussion of the Ukrainian issue, the parties voiced protocol theses on the leading role of the principles of international law relating to territorial integrity and respect for sovereignty in the conflict settlement. Western media also wrote that the Ukrainian side had stopped insisting on the so-called " Zelensky formula ", implying the immediate withdrawal of Russian troops from the territories that Ukraine considers its own.

From the moment the talks were announced, journalists wondered about the participation of a delegation from China . Sources of The Wall Street Journal reported that this conference is specifically held in Saudi Arabia in order to attract Chinese diplomats - after all, bilateral relations between Beijing and Riyadh have been deepening recently. The calculation was justified - on Friday, the Chinese Foreign Ministry confirmed that Li Hui , China's special representative for the Eurasian region, would go to Jeddah .

The location of the conference and the nature of its coverage in the Western media - defiantly ignoring Russia in the notorious "peace formula" - make it clear that its organizers in Washington and London are trying in this way to exert diplomatic pressure on the PRC in order to influence Russia.

At the same time, China will try to defend its neutral position , as well as promote its plan to resolve the crisis. This is probably why the former Chinese Ambassador to the Russian Federation, Li Hui, was sent to the conference - after a recent visit to Ukraine and Russia, he stated the importance of stopping the supply of weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine to resolve the conflict. From how “protocol” the final statements of the conference participants will be, we will find out which of the parties has succeeded more.

Statement by freelance adviser to the Ministry of Internal Affairs Vadim Denisenko

Today, the head of the Ukrainian Institute for the Future and part-time adviser to the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Vadym Denisenko , said that after the end of hostilities, it is necessary to prohibit men from leaving the country for three years or Ukrainians will not survive as a nation.

The statements drew sharp criticism from the public, which forced Denisenko to comment on his position. According to him, the problem is exclusively demographic, and leaving should not be banned, but made more difficult, or men from Ukraine will simply start leaving en masse.

The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine christened Denisenko's statement, saying that this is his personal position. The department also noted that he is in fact not an adviser to the head of the department at all.

Consequences of Russian strikes on Ukrainian ports on the Danube

Ukrainian media report that the cost of freight for agricultural products from the ports of Reni and Izmail has increased significantly. For some positions, the growth amounted to $10 per ton. At the same time, some ship owners completely refused to provide their ships for use in the ports of the Danube.

"Rebranding" of the Motherland

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

Image
Ukrainian workers today nevertheless replaced the Soviet coat of arms with the Ukrainian trident on the shield of the monument to the Motherland .

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

(Other images at link.)

The situation in Moldova for July 30 - August 6
August 6, 2023
Rybar

Image

Last week, representatives of the Armed Forces Committee of the House of Representatives of the US Congress visited Moldova to discuss "long-term relations." On the eve of the visit, an American Air Force plane with a batch of weapons landed in Chisinau.

The government of Dorin Recean has once again extended the state of emergency, which has been in force in the country since 2021.

The SIS of Moldova announced the denunciation of cooperation agreements with the FSB and the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation. The documents contained reservations about the presence of Russian special services in Transnistria , which are now considered invalid in Chisinau.

Image

Foreign policy
Relations with Russia and the CIS
The Information and Security Service (ISS) of Moldova announced the denunciation of the partnership agreement with the FSB of Russia, as well as with the SVR in the future.

The agreements were concluded in 1994 and contained additional protocols defining the presence of Russian intelligence services in Transnistria .

The SIS of Moldova stated that the denunciation of the agreements from now on means the rejection of these legal reservations. The Moldovan special services traditionally accused the Russian Federation of “destabilizing democracy” and called it a “threat to territorial integrity.”

The Consulate of the Russian Federation in Chisinau suspends the provision of consular services due to a lack of staff after the demands of the Moldovan authorities to reduce the staff of diplomats by 45 people.

In addition, in Russia, in response to the decision of the Moldovan authorities to reduce the Russian diplomatic mission, it is proposed to impose restrictions on the entry of Moldovan migrants.

The Ministry of Economic Development of Russia announced an increase in import duties on wines up to 20% from unfriendly countries, including Moldova.

Relations with the West
The UK has canceled duties and trade quotas on certain types of fruits and vegetables from Moldova for 12 months to support the "government in power". However, a few months ago, the British government was just struggling with food shortages.

Transnistria and military escalation
Militarization of Moldova
Doug Lambourne, Nancy Mays and Seth Moulton, representatives of the Committee on the Armed Services of the US House of Representatives, arrived in Moldova to discuss "long-term partnerships."

On the eve of the arrival of congressmen, a US Air Force military transport plane landed in Chisinau with a batch of weapons - sniper and assault rifles, drones and machine guns.

The American embassy emphasized the gratuitous nature of cooperation in the name of "strengthening democracy", recalling that over the past 31 years they have provided Moldova with military assistance worth $123 million.

Moldovan Defense Minister Anatoly Nosatii met with the new military attaché of Austria, Georg Dialer . At the meeting, they discussed the implementation of the program for the provision of small arms and light weapons (SALW), in which Austrian specialists play a significant role. At the same time, the Austrians also make up a significant part of the so-called power contingent. "civilian mission" of the EU in Moldova.

The Parliament of Moldova in the second reading approved the bill on the creation of a modern military town in the suburbs of the capital Bachoi .

Relations between Moldova and Transnistria
PMR Foreign Minister Vitaly Ignatiev said that the Moldovan authorities are evading negotiations on the Transnistrian settlement and are increasing pressure on Transnistria, declaring its citizens wanted on charges of "conspiracy against statehood" and "separatism."

Interior setting
Government work
The Parliament of Moldova approved the extension of the state of emergency in the country for another 60 days. Prime Minister Dorin Recean said at the meeting that the state of emergency is necessary because of the "persisting risks and threats against the national security and energy conservation" of the country.

In the second reading, the Parliament adopted the bill of Maia Sandu on the establishment of the Center for Strategic Communications and the Fight against Disinformation.

Energy Minister Viktor Parlikov announced the government's intention to privatize state-owned power grid companies Furnizarea Energiei Electrice Nord and RED Nord in the north of the country "in order to get a good price for them."

On July 31, the deadline set by the new head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Adrian Efros, to complete an internal investigation into the case of an armed attack at the Chisinau airport, expired. However, the department has not released the results.

Opposition
The chairman of the Socialist Party, Vladimir Voronin, accused the authorities of discriminating against the parliament, intimidating the opposition, and deliberately destroying the country. The party called on the opposition to consolidate around the demand for early parliamentary elections.

On August 3, the Renaissance party held a rally in front of the presidential administration building in Chisinau against the establishment of censorship and dictatorship with the help of the "combating disinformation" center.

Rybar

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-moldavii- ... 6-avgusta/

Google Translator

******

Image

The corporate media brought war to Ukraine. Then this created an anti-NATO movement that’s threatening its narrative dominance.

BY RAINER SHEA
AUGUST 5, 2023

Humanity for Peace, the organization that’s holding a rally this week on Hiroshima Day, is putting forth these demands:

1.the immediate ending of all funding and weapons to Ukraine.
2.convene immediate unconditional peace talks.
3.the dissolution of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
4.a new international security architecture must be created to end the division of the world into blocs, eliminating geopolitics. This new architecture must take into account the security concerns of every sovereign nation, large or small.

These ideas are, in essence, shared by the primary leaders who’ve been facilitating the transition to a multipolar world. Pepe Escobar has observed how “The year 2022 ended with a Zoom call to end all Zoom calls: Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping discussing all aspects of the Russia-China strategic partnership in an exclusive video call…On their coordination to ‘form a just world order based on international law,’ Putin emphasized how ‘we share the same views on the causes, course, and logic of the ongoing transformation of the global geopolitical landscape.’ Facing ‘unprecedented pressure and provocations from the west,’ Putin noted how Russia-China are not only defending their own interests ‘but also all those who stand for a truly democratic world order and the right of countries to freely determine their own destiny.’”

The fact that Russia’s actions in Ukraine are supported by socialist states like the DPRK; and by Global South liberation movements like the one led by Burkina Faso’s Captain Ibrahim Traoré; shows Humanity for Peace is advancing a program that’s collectively backed by the world’s fastest-rising political forces. Those being the forces that are replacing American power.

This is why Humanity for Peace’s graphic displaying these demands has been getting a wildly outsize reaction (relative to its exposure in the places where it initially got posted) from the forces which seek to make NATO continue dominating the discourse. Reddit, the social network that in effect functions as a discourse management tool for the Democratic Party’s online wing, has been seeing this graphic widely shared. This has suddenly made Humanity for Peace’s program commonly known not just among English-speaking pro-NATO partisans, but also among a variety of European ones, as I’ve discovered upon finding German-language commenters who’ve linked to the graphic. Obviously these actors have been sharing the graphic with the intent to ridicule Humanity for Peace’s ideas, but this could backfire.

The pro-NATO pseudo-fandoms behind this mass mockery campaign feel comfortable widely sharing the graphic because Reddit is an echo chamber, seemingly making it implausible that these ideas could reach the country’s broad working class. Yet the fact that these pro-NATO discourse management centers have felt the need to respond to the graphic so sensationally and disproportionately is an indication that the more actions the anti-NATO movement takes, the more threatened the discourse managers get.

The worst thing that could happen for the Democratic Party; as well as for its narrative management wings in the online spaces, the corporate media, and elsewhere; is the USA’s workers being widely exposed to the same anti-imperialist ideas driving most of the rest of the world to increasingly defy American hegemony. The interests of this country’s workers align with this global effort to end the hegemon’s rule; therefore if too many of these workers get the opportunity to absorb the ideas behind this effort, the entire system gets destabilized. Externally, the empire becomes unable to maintain the dollar’s dominance, as internal mass opposition towards the war machine renders untenable the global war operations which keep the dollar strong. Internally, the empire becomes unable to keep using the Democratic Party to co-opt and divert the class struggle, as the workers have become too educated to accept their rights movement being led by an imperialist party. These are the two disaster scenarios that NATO’s narrative managers are tasked with preventing.

The more they’ve worked to stop this upheaval of the discourse, though, the more we’ve seen a trend: the events that get produced by the actions of the new cold warriors end up leading to the same disruptions within the liberal order which they fear so much. When their eight years of warmongering over Ukraine enabled an unacceptable series of escalations by Washington and Kiev, escalations which provoked Moscow into intervening, this only provided the cold warriors with a temporary gain in their perceived credibility. The supposed mandate to unify behind NATO which the Ukraine war created throughout Europe can only be viewed as such for so long; there’s a limit to Europe’s loyalty towards Washington, and the grievous economic costs of the Ukraine war have in the long term made their relationship more strained than it would have been otherwise.

Commentator Radhika Desai observes why bringing about the Ukraine proxy war represented a doomed gamble for the hegemon:

China. Knowing that Europe, already reluctant to go to war with Russia, would be even more reluctant (for sound economic reasons) to join any anti-Chinese venture, Biden sought so resolutely and completely to sunder Europe from Russia and bind it to the US through the Ukraine war that it would have no choice but to go along with the US on China later. However, this enterprise got off to an unpromising start and is now unravelling. Marshalling unity even against Russia was hard, involving as it did inflicting a great deal of economic pain on Europe. Even with the Biden Administration’s historical luck of having astonishingly compliant leaderships in so many capitals, pre-eminently Berlin, NATO unity over Ukraine conflict has been more a show than a reality, with a minimum of real and maximum of show compliance. Sanctions have generally been confined those that hurt the least, leaving so many western companies still operating in Russia one wonders what the fuss is all about. Weapons supplies have focused on those that are easiest to spare, often obsolete, leaving Ukraine with a ‘Big Zoo of NATO equipment’ that is hard to deploy or repair efficiently.

The momentary reunification of NATO, and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, have been hollow “victories” compared to the defeats the conflict has brought to the empire. With the acceleration of the progress by BRI and BRICS that Russia’s special operation has brought, ultimately Washington’s rivals are in a better place to define the 21st century than they would be if Russia had continued to respond passively.

These international victories for the anti-imperialist cause aren’t the only unexpected outcomes that the new cold warriors have brought by starting the war, though. Their overconfident attempt to destabilize Eurasia has also turned into a catalyst for the rise of a new anti-imperialist movement within the heart of the empire. A movement that’s capable of sabotaging U.S. capital’s final, desperate plan for trying to maintain power in a post-American world; that plan being to engineer a further degrowth of the economy, while implementing a liberal fascism which suppresses counter-hegemonic political actors.

The irony is that if this plan is as successful as the schemes the defenders of the liberal order have been employing so far, it will be the thing which unintentionally ends this order.

——————————————————

The present phase of the power struggle between the liberal culture hegemony, and those who challenge it, began when the liberal order’s credibility as a viable post-Soviet world system became threatened in 2008. The anti-Bush movement, and the revelations of Iraq WMD fraudulence that aided this movement, had only represented a counter to the hegemon for so long. Due to the liberal tailism of the movement’s leadership sources, such as ANSWER, the demonstrations failed to take on a revolutionary and sustainable nature. So when the neoliberal economic order imploded at the end of the Bush era, the ruling class was in a state of crisis, but it also was able to try to reinforce liberalism without being challenged by any strong revolutionary presence.

The empire’s attempts to compensate for its economic decline through military aggression had lost Washington much credibility. And with China’s rise, along with Russia’s break from being a U.S. client state, the world’s anti-imperialist forces had undergone a resurgence in strength throughout the decade. These emerging global advantages for revolutionary politics, though, wouldn’t be able to bring the U.S. closer to revolution until a radical force emerged within the core.

So throughout the Obama era, the ruling class was able to successfully fortify liberalism. With Occupy Wall Street, the state not only carried out a repressive campaign against the elements of the movement that could be seen as a threat; it also, more importantly, co-opted the class struggle via the Democratic Party. The movement was a mass reaction to worsening economic conditions, a reaction that largely had a spontaneous character. It couldn’t gain leadership from revolutionary organizations, and it was made unable to bring its participants towards Marxism in part due to its vulgarized rhetoric (talking about “the 99%” in a way which obscured the particular worker-capitalist nature of class conflict) and due to its attracting participants who largely weren’t even workers (rather lumpen elements).

As the imperialists started up the new cold war, the serious opposition they encountered was mainly from American RT journalists, who would get attacked by the neocons but weren’t yet viewed with as much apprehension as they eventually would be. This changed in November 2016, when liberalism’s weaknesses were revealed.

The 2008 crisis made Trump’s election possible, not because of “economic anxiety” but because of the loss in institutional trust that economic downturns inevitably create—including among voting bases like Trump’s, which wasn’t even particularly working class. It had also happened in the context of a left-wing populist movement having emerged that year; a movement whose reformist leader, Bernie Sanders, wasn’t able to stop many within his base from seeking out alternatives to the Democratic Party. Simply the fact that such an event had been able to manifest was enough to provoke the upholders of liberalism into panicked attempts at restoring normalcy. Which wasn’t possible, since capitalism’s long crisis can only grow more severe, so they had to at least aim for maintaining dominance over the narrative.

The way they tried to do this was by constructing a conspiracy narrative about the Trump campaign having worked with Russia to interfere in the election. This was an idea that would let them portray the antiwar movement, and any other movement which sought to act independently from the Democratic Party, as a synthetic invention of a foreign adversary. In 2019, after this “Russiagate” accusation had lost perceived credibility everywhere outside the neoliberal propaganda echo chamber, Aaron Maté observed the corrupt secret maneuverings which had made the accusation come to be treated seriously in the mainstream. Maté wrote of how Attorney General John Durham and Attorney General William Barr, who were carrying out a DOJ investigation into Russiagate’s origins, had been able to find a series of suspect events to look into; one of which being intelligence asset Christopher Steele’s clearly unreliable “reporting” on Trump’s personal life and supposed links to Russia:

We have yet to receive a credible explanation for why intelligence officials thought it was appropriate to take cues from an unverified collection of lurid conspiracy theories about Trump—all paid for by his political opponent. What has already been revealed is damning enough. The FBI cited the Steele dossier to obtain a surveillance warrant on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page in October 2016, telling the court that it “believes that [Russia’s] efforts are being coordinated with Page and perhaps other individuals associated with,” the Trump campaign. Its source for that wild supposition was Steele, whom it described as “Source #1” & “credible.” Then there is the role of the CIA under John Brennan. Multiple news reports make clear that the CIA is a principal focus of Barr and Durham’s inquiry. In breaking the story of the expanded criminal inquiry, The New York Times includes the curious claim that Durham has asked interview subjects “whether C.I.A. officials might have somehow tricked the F.B.I. into opening the Russia investigation.” Although there are limitations on how much we can make of one sentence, that is a tantalizing clue pointing to Brennan. The former CIA director has taken credit for launching the Russia investigation…

After the Special Counsel investigation that was supposed to prove Russiagate failed to produce evidence, the narrative managers temporarily shifted to China as their main target. The CIA-fueled unrest in Hong Kong, and then the pandemic, made them better able to propagate psyops like the “Uyghur genocide” and the “Taiwan is its own country” argument. And the liberals and liberal-aligned “leftists” accepted these ideas, partly because Russiagate had just inculcated them with hostility towards anybody who challenges pro-imperialist narratives.

When Trump’s destabilizing leadership model got replaced with a new version of the Obama administration, the narrative managers got an opportunity to placate socialist or socialist-adjacent movements; as domination by liberals always creates obstacles towards revolutionary efforts, and Russiagate had already allowed for anti-imperialists to become heavily censored and stigmatized. With January 6th, the liberals were able to effectively carry out a counter-coup, where they used the actions of the American right to censor Palestinians and (other voices opposing U.S. foreign policy) while intensifying repression against all judged to be “extremists.”

These were the advantages the narrative managers had by the time their efforts to escalate the tensions with Russia finally brought about a European proxy war. Yet when the Biden administration then tried to maintain this control over the narrative, at the same time it perpetuated a wildly destructive and clearly unnecessary military adventure, these advantages became no longer enough to keep the situation stable. Biden’s driving up inflation, and creating a danger of a third world war, would inevitably lead to the rise of an anti-NATO movement. This was a threat that the narrative managers would then have to try to neutralize, potentially bringing a narrative disruption more severe than the one from 2016.

——————————————————

The narrative of the liberals and liberal-adjacent leftists who opposed this February’s Rage Against the War Machine rally was that it had been a failure; but the fact that these actors felt an urge to attack the rally in itself proved the rally posed a genuine threat towards our ruling institutions. The ones with the task of gatekeeping radical spaces on the Democratic Party’s behalf have decided to try to censure and isolate this new anti-imperialist coalition, which proves this coalition deserves our support.

Between RAWM, and this year’s rally put on by the anti-Russian left formation ANSWER, RAWM was the one which provoked outlets like MSNBC to attack it. This is because even though ANSWER calls itself the “ANSWER coalition,” it’s not truly a coalition; it hasn’t done the crucial thing RAWM has, which is forming a collaborative effort with forces which aren’t exclusively on the left. Many of the people represented by RAWM’s non-left elements, such as the Libertarians, are members of the most conscious element of the people: the element that’s come to an anti-imperialist consciousness. The communists within the RAWM coalition have been able to recognize that this element doesn’t exist solely on the left; and that many of those who claim to be on the “left” are in fact obstinately pro-imperialist in their thinking and practice.

It’s because of this that our ruling institutions have been acting like RAWM, and the permanent organizing project which has since emerged from it, are a genuine threat. These institutions aren’t concerned when they see a group of liberal-adjacent leftists claiming to support a compromised version of anti-imperialism, while not intending to expand their outreach beyond the niche minority within “left” activist spaces. When they see communists who share the pro-Russian stance of global anti-imperialist movements building something that truly exists independently from the Democratic Party, there’s reason for concern. That’s why as soon as Humanity for Peace (a project that RAWM is responsible for) got a little bit of visibility, the propaganda wings of these institutions (in this case Reddit) tried to counter it.

When the rally takes place tomorrow, we’ll see whether the corporate media joins in on the campaign against Humanity for Peace. Should we find a way to make its demands widely known, which the Redditors are ironically doing the most to make happen, no doubt the narrative managers will try to discredit it on a larger platform. In the longer term, what can truly decide whether the present iteration of the anti-imperialist movement succeeds is how much it’s influenced the discourse by the end of the 2024 election cycle. If this movement can make the Democratic Party unable to define how our culture views the Biden administration’s actions and ideas at the end of next year, the Democrats will have definitively lost their monopoly over organizing spaces at a crucial juncture in the class struggle.

Cornel West has the potential to bring a big part of this disruption we need within our national dialogue. For a candidate who speaks out against the Ukraine psyop to gain a significant amount of the vote, or at least sustain a significant amount of relevance within the conversation, would to an extent permanently diminish Democrat control over the mass consciousness. It would greatly expand the amount of the people who’ve resolved never to vote for a Democratic presidential candidate again, due to becoming aware that a viable alternative exists to lesser-evil reformism. That alternative is to build an anti-imperialist movement capable of defeating the state; which is only possible on the basis of a principled rejection of ideas and actions that reinforce the Democratic Party’s dominance.

The Democrats, as well as the anti-Russian left orgs that tail the Democrats, are going to try to portray voting for West as a betrayal of marginalized people; but this could be made more difficult should the many black Obama voters who’ve lately become disillusioned with the Democrats join with West. And that’s a real possibility, given how clearly Biden has shown himself to be one of the backstabbing white liberals Malcolm X warned about.

Politico has reported that the DNC is worried about just such things happening: “some Democratic officials and strategists worry that the urgency to vote for Biden has dissipated for some voters since Trump left the White House. They are anxious that young people, in particular, might be receptive to West’s message…There is also a belief among CBC [Congressional Black Caucus] members that the drive to elect the first Black speaker — Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries — would be a motivator for Black voters, too…Many advisers to Biden downplay the threat West holds in pulling away Black voters, pointing to Biden’s record in appointing both the first Black female vice president and Supreme Court justice. They also note record low Black unemployment rates.”

These are things the Democrats are saying to make themselves feel less anxious. Malcolm X said that “If you stick a knife in my back 9 inches and pull it out 6 inches, there’s no progress. If you pull it all the way out, that’s not progress. The progress is healing the wound that the blow made.. And they won’t even admit the knife is there.” By an honest assessment, the Democrats aren’t even pulling the knife out by one inch; the context these advisers leave out is that black families have been suffering the most from the rises in gas, food, and housing costs which Biden’s war has been exacerbating.

These things make it obvious not only that a major political disruption is coming, but that the liberals are trying to block out this reality. Many workers, black workers in particular, now have the potential to become radicalized; and this radicalization could turn plenty of them into communists should they learn about the recent liberal fascist maneuvers to suppress black communism, maneuvers which have been directly related to the proxy war. By indicting the members of the African People’s Socialist Party in retaliation for their speaking out against the Ukraine psyop; then creating a bill (RESTRICT) that would codify the fascist legal logic behind the indictments; the liberals have made enemies of a great amount of the people.

By provoking war in Ukraine, the imperialists made the job of their narrative managers ultimately far harder. They let the anti-imperialists become able to point to a highly destructive, highly visible series of crimes that our government is committing, and rally a growing number of the people around ending these crimes. The proxy war’s failure is prompting the imperialists to pivot towards a campaign of hybrid warfare against BRICS, and against the broader series of countries which may align with China. And they hope this war can be mostly concealed from the public, like how other new cold war components such as AFRICOM or the sanctions have been able to exist with relatively little mass scrutiny.

RAWM, West’s campaign, and the other counter-hegemonic developments which the proxy war has helped make possible are capable of making the war on BRICS unable to be hidden in such a way. Because what happens when the people become impassioned about fighting imperialism? More of them start to closely follow reporting about the crimes of their government. That’s the longer-term threat which the backlash to the proxy war has the potential to create towards the empire. Should communists navigate our conditions properly, what could follow this shift in mass consciousness is the final defeat of the capitalist state.

https://newswiththeory.com/the-corporat ... dominance/

******

Arrivals on the Chongar bridge
August 6, 22:40

Image

The enemy, after powerful nighttime missile strikes by the RF Armed Forces, responded with strikes on the Chongar bridge.
As a result, I made holes in the bridge, one of the spans + the adjacent gas pipeline was damaged. 1 or 2 rockets fell side by side.
Repairs will take some time, traffic on the damaged bridge has been temporarily suspended, and work is also underway to restore gas supply to a nearby population where gas has disappeared.

Image

Image

It looks like there were no casualties. The bridge is likely to be launched again by September or earlier. To completely block it ala Antonovsky bridge, the enemy will have to repeat such attacks much more often, since HIMARS do not shoot to the bridge, and the cost of Storm Shadow or SCALP EG is about 2.5 million dollars a piece, with a limited number of such missiles. The main thing is to work out the process of sealing current and potential holes in the spans.

Of course, the temporary suspension of traffic on the Chongarsky bridge will increase the travel time from Crimea to the same Melitopol by about 1.5-2 hours.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8549725.html

On the prospects for a "peace summit in Jeddah"
August 6, 5:41 p.m

Image

Against the backdrop of the hype about the "peace summit in Jeddah," I would like to note that the chances for success of this summit are about the same as those of the Minsk agreements.
A much more telling factor is the process of increasing the production of weapons and ammunition in the interests of the long-term war in Ukraine. The US war financing programs are calculated until 2026-2027. It is from this that we must proceed when we are engaged in strengthening the armed forces, building up the grouping in the NVO zone and increasing the output of defense products. If you want peace, prepare for war. In our case, to a long war, as it was in Syria, only at maximum speed.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8549042.html

War in Ukraine. Summary 07.08.2023
August 7, 1:30 p.m

Image

War in Ukraine. Summary 08/07/2023

1. In the Zaporozhye direction, the enemy continued attacks in the Orekhovsky direction, but could not achieve any significant progress in the direction of Pyatikhatki and Rabotino. Neither another change of tactics, nor the massive use of cluster munitions helped reverse the negative trends for the enemy, which causes growing skepticism in the West about the prospects for such an expensive offensive, which the United States and all its main satellites have been preparing since the end of last year, spending more than 200 billion dollars. dollars. Several settlements in the foreground of the Russian defense are clearly not what Washington was counting on.

2. On the Vremyevsky ledge, fighting continues in Staromayorsky (the enemy has not been able to establish full control over the village, ours appear there in the southern regions, the enemy controls the northern part of the village and is trying to expand the zone of control around the village in order to be able to intensively attack the adjacent heights, which controlled by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.The enemy is also trying to solve the problem that has arisen in Staromayorskoye, by attacking Urozhaynoye, which ours hold and do not allow the enemy, relying on Staromayorskoye and Urozhaynoye, to develop an attack on Staromlynovka.As a result, the Ukrainian offensive is stalling here, wasting time

. without significant changes - positional battles continue with periodic local attempts by the parties to improve their position in the landings and in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bdachas.

4. On the Maryinsky direction also without significant changes. In the western part of the city, the front stands, in the area of ​​"Zvirinets" and near Krasnogorovka in the area of ​​the ventilation shaft of the Trudovskaya mine, without significant changes.

5. In the Avdiivka area, positional battles continue with periodic attacks from the sides near Vodiane, Pervomaisky and Severny, as well as near Nevelskoye, where ours recently managed to advance towards the village (however, it is still far from taking Nevelskoye). To the north, fighting continues west of Krasnogorovka. Ours are fixed in new positions in the Kamenka area, from where they recently pushed the APU. There is still no operational encirclement of Avdiivka, despite the shelling of the road from Orlivka.

6. In the area of ​​Artemovsk, our troops continue to repel enemy attacks in the direction of Dubovo-Vasilyevka, Berkhovka, Kleshcheevka, Andreevka and Kurdyumovka. Despite the titanic efforts and the reserves transferred here, Syrsky still cannot take at least one settlement in order to announce at least some tactical success. The resilience of our troops and the huge losses of the enemy made adjustments to the enemy's plans for the rapid capture of Artemovsk in a semi-envelope. It is also worth noting that the enemy is trying to be active with DRG forces in the area of ​​dachas on the southwestern outskirts of Artemovsk - the situation here is generally controlled, the enemy has no forces for a direct assault on the city from the west, although Artemovskaya meat grinder 2.0 might and would be beneficial to us. But the enemy will obviously not give us a second such gift.

7. On the Seversky ledge, as a whole, no changes. Enemy attacks in the direction of Soledar were confidently stopped. Our troops, in turn, continue positional battles in the area of ​​​​Disputed and Belogorovka, but we have not yet made significant progress here either. The main threat to the Seversky ledge now is the threat of Russian troops to reach the northern bank of the Seversky Donets west of Belogorovka and take the Seversk-Belogorovka road under fire control, which could violate the integrity of the defense of the ledge.

8. The successful offensive of the Russian troops continues in the Svatovsky direction. Novoselovka was completely liberated, which opens up opportunities for a further offensive against Kupyansk not only from the north and northeast, but also from the east and southeast. The control of Novoselovsky removes the threat from Kuzemovka and sharply reduces the enemy's prospects in the Svatovsky direction. The advance to Oskol also continues at a speed of 1-1.5 km per day. The enemy continues to overtake reserves to strengthen the grouping in the Kupyansk area and in the Svatovsky direction as a whole.
In the Krasnolimansky direction, the enemy is still holding positions in the area of ​​​​Torskoye and Yampolovka, periodically undertaking counterattacks. Also, the enemy is still holding the defense in the western and southwestern parts of the forest area to the west of Kremennaya.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8550875.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10972
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 08, 2023 12:17 pm

The coherence of Ukraine
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/08/2023

Image

The peace summit with which Saudi Arabia had wanted to raise its profile on the international geopolitical scene by presenting itself as a sui generis mediator between the bloc of Ukraine's allies and the rest of the world . The fact that there has not even been a final joint communiqué reveals the real relevance of that summit for peace , which always had other intentions and was never an option to seek a resolution to the conflict. “Ukraine seeks progress towards peace in Saudi Arabia talks”, naively headlined Reuters last week. The idea is representative of the point of view given by the entire Western press since the holding of this brief summit was known, in which, of course, Russia has not been invited. In the absence of the other party to the war, walking towards peace was materially impossible, so the summit had an aura of déjà vu from what happened between 2015 and 2022.

The Donbass war does not by itself explain the reason for the Russian invasion of February 2022, but it is impossible to understand the current situation without paying attention to the war that began in 2014 and the sabotaged peace process that began a year later by means of signature by delegation of an agreement brokered by Angela Merkel, Vladimir Putin, Petro Poroshenko and François Hollande. The signing of that agreement is the beginning of a process in which Ukraine never had the intention of fulfilling its commitments. It is significant that the signatory was not Petro Poroshenko, who like the other heads of state or government was there, but Leonid Kuchma, the second president of independent Ukraine. Also in Minsk were the then leaders of the DPR and the RPL, Alexander Zakharchenko and Igor Plotnitsky, who were not allowed to participate in the negotiation and could sign the agreement only in their personal capacity, without mentioning any position. That was the commitment that allowed Poroshenko to acquire, through the proxy Kuchma, a series of obligations towards the population of the People's Republics, whose leaders he did not want to grant any type of recognition.

Since then, Kiev has worked to translate the peace process into a format where it does not have to share a table with terrorists , separatists , Russian puppets.. There were no People's Republics, those entities did not represent the population of Donbass in any way, and Ukraine was under no obligation to negotiate with them at all. That was, and remains, Ukraine's position from the very beginning. The denial of the existence of an internal conflict in Ukraine since 2014 - whose bases go back to the way in which the country was configured and the changes that the post-Maidan state sought to impose - made any negotiations with Donetsk and Lugansk unnecessary and limited the peace process to the demand for Russian capitulation. Hence the Ukrainian government, both under Poroshenko and under Zelensky, always preferred to negotiate directly with the aggressor state., Russia, and not with the Ukrainian citizens Alexander Zakharchenko, Igor Plotnitsky, Denis Pushilin or Leonid Pasechnik, all of them leaders of the People's Republics between 2015 and 2022.

This explains why the points of the Minsk agreements were never taken into account and that any agreement had to proceed, not from the Trilateral Contact Group, but from the Normandy Format, in which the People's Republics had no presence and Ukraine also had the practically unconditional support of its European partners, fundamentally the German Government. It is no coincidence that the main agreement reached in the Minsk years was named after the then Foreign Minister and today the President of Germany Frank-Walter Steinmeier. It is also no coincidence that his then already famous Steinmeier formula, simply a road map for the accelerated fulfillment of a part of the Minsk agreements that kyiv was never going to fulfill, was not ratified by the Contact Group until the agreement came from the Normandy Format. For several years, the People's Republics and Russia had raised the German formula as a way to unravel a process that was stillborn and that Ukraine was in charge of finishing off. However, kyiv's envoys to Minsk always refused its ratification. They did it for the last time, always citing technicalities or simply evasively, just a few days before that formula was adopted as a way out of the blockade by Merkel, Macron, Putin and Zelensky at the summit of heads of state and government held in December 2019.

So yes, upon receiving the Normandy Format proposal, the Ukrainian delegation was ordered to approve the adoption of the Steinmeier formula in the Contact Group. The approval of the measure and its apparent acceptance by Ukraine was not, as some article critical of Zelensky now claims, the result of an agreement with the separatists., but rather the acceptance of a German proposal in a four-way negotiation context with its European allies. And despite the fact that the announcement caused protests by the extreme right led by the Azov movement and groups linked to the Ukrainian radical nationalist diaspora in North America, it was not these demonstrations that prevented its implementation but a Ukrainian action consistent with what happened. until then. At that December 2019 summit, Kiev managed, thanks to Angela Merkel's negotiation with Vladimir Putin, to guarantee his country a priority gas supply contract and the guarantee of Russian gas transit to Europe even regardless of whether the North Stream-2 came into operation, an essential economic measure for Ukraine at that time of crisis. The acceptance of the Steinmeier formula , for the implementation of which Ukraine did not take a single step in the more than two years that elapsed until the Russian recognition of the People's Republics on February 22, 2022, was nothing more than the counterpart to achieve that agreement. As in Minsk, when Ukraine signed an agreement it never intended to implement, in December 2019 in Paris, kyiv agreed to a formula to relaunch the Minsk process simply to save face.

Something similar has happened in Jeddah, where according to the scant information available, Ukraine for the first time gave way in its attempt to discuss only its peace proposal . According to The Wall Street Journal , Kiev did not refuse to discuss a second proposal, the authorship of which is not known, although it is to be hoped that it is from Saudi Arabia, something that the Western press is presenting as a Ukrainian concession in search of peace. From the Russian side, that concession it has been taken as proof that the Ukrainian offensive, now in its third month, has failed. Both interpretations are wrong: there is no compromise in Kiev's position, which is only willing to accept discussing proposals in which the prerequisite to start any negotiation is the recovery of the country's territorial integrity according to its 1991 borders. In practice , Ukraine continues to demand from Russia the unconditional surrender that it demanded for seven years in Donbass -despite the fact that it was not the Russian army that was fighting the trenches of that war-, to which it has now also added the demand for the surrender of Crimea.

The Jeddah summit only sought to annul any alternative proposal to Ukraine's, especially those that imply negotiation with the other party. Ukraine has always sought a resolution to the Ukrainian conflict imposed by its partners and in which it did not have to accept any responsibility for the loss of territories, the outbreak of the war in 2014, the crimes committed against the civilian population - including non-payment of pensions in Donbass or the cut off of the water supply to Crimea - and in which he had to cede absolutely nothing, especially in terms of political or even cultural autonomy to those populations that he still tries to subdue.

Proof that the situation has not changed is the speech that Ukrainian officials held all day yesterday. In his usual line of demanding more and more, on Sunday Mikhailo Podolyak demanded, in a thinly veiled manner, changes to the "Russian Constitution", a document "that is not immovable". Hours earlier, Podolyak had stated in an interview that, after the war, Russia will have to be smaller and change its flag. Ukraine not only does not lower unrealistic expectations of it, but increasingly demands more. Yesterday, Volodymyr Zelensky threatened Russia to eliminate the entire fleet from it if Russia does not stop attacking the Black Sea ports. Taking into account that kyiv has declared all Russian ports legitimate targets, not only those like Novorossiysk, which have a military aspect, but also Gelendzhik or Sochi,

For Ukraine, the only conclusion is that “there can be no negotiation process in the current arrangement. The status quoit must be changed on the battlefield. That means…more weapons, missiles and aviation.” This was written yesterday by Mikhailo Podolyak, whose words are in perfect harmony with the Ukrainian actions of trying to make concessions that in reality are non-existent and also with what was stated by its president. Yesterday afternoon, Andriy Ermak, head of the Office of the President, today's royal government of Ukraine, complained that some countries had refused to discuss the Ukrainian proposal. Ermak, the Ukrainian president's right-hand man, also stated that one of the points on which he could not agree was that of "Russia's responsibility." Making it clear which proposal is the most openly rejected, specifically the one that implies a ceasefire and negotiation without prerequisites, Volodymyr Zelensky has once again charged against Lula da Silva, who even before he became president claimed that the Ukrainian president also bore part of the responsibility for the outbreak of the war. "It is strange to talk about security guarantees for Russia," said the Ukrainian president, adding that "only Russia, Putin and Lula talk about Russia's security." The objective of the Jeddah summit was precisely to nullify any proposal that takes into account any party other than Ukraine, be it Russia or the population that Kiev intends to expel, punish or re-educate. Therein lies the coherence of Ukraine since 2015.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/08/la-co ... more-27883

Google Translator

******

Chronicle of the special military operation for August 7, 2023
August 7, 2023
Rybar

Ukrainian formations intensified on the flanks of Bakhmut , resuming attacks in small groups on the positions of the RF Armed Forces. Last night, several groups attacked from the direction of Orekhovo-Vasilevka and the route to Slavyansk , but after the Russian Aerospace Forces helicopter strikes, they retreated. In addition, fighting is going on in the Yagodnoye-Berkhovka sector.

In the Zaporozhye direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attacked the Russian positions near Urozhayne , but were unable to achieve success. At the same time, the situation at the Orekhovsky block remains stable. The enemy continues to accumulate manpower and equipment for further actions.

Information appeared on the network that the German government had reached a consensus on the supply of long-range Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine . Given the supply of Storm Shadow and Scalp from the UK and France, this course of events was expected.

Image

Once again about strikes on the airfield in Starokonstantinov

Image
Information continues to appear on the Web about the consequences of the strike of the Russian Armed Forces on the airfield in Starokonstantinov in the Khmelnytsky region, which occurred two days ago. According to satellite images from August 6, at least two hits on the hangar and aircraft parking are visible on the territory of the object. Also there are two destructions in the area of ​​the fuel storage and accumulations of non-flying aircraft, acting as "donors" of spare parts.

At the same time, a thermal anomaly map from NASA registered a large fire in a completely different place in the western part of the airfield. However, this can be caused by both an error and the inability to see the traces of this fire due to the low quality of satellite images.

At the same time, the NASA service registered two thermal anomalies south of the airfield, which is confirmed by data from open sources: according to Ukrainian resources, an elevator was indeed hit in this area.

Apparently, the target of the raid by the Russian Armed Forces was again the Su-24M aircraft based in Starokonstantinov with Storm Shadow cruise missiles , as well as the facilities supporting their operation. Damage from the impact is difficult to determine, but it is clearly limited.

It is extremely reckless to count on putting the entire airfield out of action: only kilotons of air bombs thrown at it or even a nuclear charge can destroy it, which is unbelievable in the current realities.

The situation on the front line and the fighting

In the Starobelsky direction in the Kupyansky section , Russian military personnel continue their offensive towards the Oskol River , the Russian Aerospace Forces and artillery are actively working. There are no significant changes in the Kremensky section . The parties are engaged in artillery duels along the line of contact. Russian Armed Forces strike at the positions of Ukrainian formations

Image
In the Soledar direction around Bakhmut , after a short lull, Ukrainian formations resumed attacks on Russian positions in small groups. On the northern flank , the nationalist battalion "Donbass" was transferred to Zvanovka . Apparently, in the near future, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will again begin attacks in the direction of Yakovlevka .

Also last night, several assault groups on nine units of armored vehicles of various types rolled from the direction of Orekhovo - Vasilevka and the route to Slavyansk . Helicopters of army aviation inflicted several blows on the attackers, as a result of which the Armed Forces of Ukraine retreated.

Shooting battles are going on at the turn of Yagodnoye - Berkhovka , where the Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to break through the defense of Russian fighters with small forces. Artillerymen of the RF Armed Forces conduct heavy shelling at enemy strongholds in Khromovo .

On the southern flank near Kleshcheevka , the enemy is recuperating. One of the unidentified formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be disbanded due to losses, and the personnel will be sent to resupply the 23rd and 33rd brigade in the Orekhovsky and Ugledarsky areas .

According to the VerumReactor channel , early in the morning two tanks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (one with a mine sweep) and two infantry fighting vehicles, covering the infantry, attacked the lines of the 72nd motorized rifle brigade of the RF Armed Forces. The artillery of the 72nd Omsbr was struck, as a result of which at least two infantry fighting vehicles were hit, and the rest retreated.

Image
In the Vremyevsky sector , according to Voin DV , an enemy infantry group tried to attack the positions of the RF Armed Forces near Urozhaynoye , but as a result of a small-arms battle, the enemy was driven back.

Apart from this sortie, the situation remained virtually unchanged. After the bloody campaign against Staromayorskoye, the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to restore combat capability due to huge losses in manpower. Our artillerymen and aviation are conducting a massive shelling of Ukrainian formations. Due to intense fire, the forces of the rifle battalion of the 1st detachment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine retreated from the landings west of Staromayorsky.


Marine units of the 35th and 37th brigades of the Marine Corps are understaffed with mobilized ones. According to the interception of negotiations, the RF Armed Forces successfully hit one of the training grounds of the 37th military regiment in Maksimovka . At the same time , the forces of the newly created 142 infantry jaeger brigade were transferred to Temirovka . Three more similar compounds are being formed at several test sites in Ukraine.

Image
The activity of Ukrainian formations in the Orekhovsky sector remains low. Continuous attempts to break through the line Rabotino - Verbovoye and Pyatikhatki - Zherebyanka led to heavy losses in manpower.

Because of this, paratroopers of the 46th airborne brigade of the Airborne Forces of Ukraine from the Marun tactical group were deployed from the rear areas to Orekhov . Earlier, formations of 71 ebr arrived to Belogorye . So far, units of the 46th Oembr are occupying new frontiers. During the last days there were several small sorties by infantry groups, probably as part of reconnaissance in force, but the attacks were repulsed.

Artillery formations from the 44th and 47th divisions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as units of the 10th Army Corps, continue to move to the front line. At the same time, even in the "elite" brigades, there is a shortage of equipment, and due to lack of time, repair teams operate at the forefront.

Despite the reduction in combat potential, the enemy still has resources . The shelling does not subside, but the supply of shells continues. But the introduction of the tactical group " Maroon " confirms the data on the heavy losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. As proof of this, a new brigade hastily formed in Primorsky .

Fighting continues in the area of ​​​​the Antonovsky bridge in the Kherson direction . Despite the absence of large-scale forcing attempts, the presence of the enemy remains. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are under constant artillery strikes of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and so far are only accumulating forces on the bridgehead, replenishing the bearing losses of strength.

In the meantime, Russian fighters are hitting detected targets on the enemy-controlled banks of the Dnieper . Warehouses and accumulations of the enemy, depending on the situation, hit with cannon or rocket artillery, aviation is actively working.

Shelling of rear territories and residential areas
Summing up the results of the past week, we can say that the shelling of the DPR intensified: 152 more shells were fired at the agglomeration. The dynamics of shelling in the Belgorod region has increased significantly - 52.7% more shells have landed there. In the Kherson region, the situation with fire raids is the same, and yesterday the Armed Forces of Ukraine attacked the bridges connecting the region with the Crimea .

Shelling complicates the humanitarian situation, damages residential and infrastructure facilities and leads to fires. In addition, the enemy is actively trying to strike at the rear regions of Russia, including the capital. Within a week, fragments of drones were shot down and found in the Moscow and Kaluga regions.

Although often such attacks are demonstrative and do not lead to significant damage, they should not be discounted. The enemy analyzes the results and determines new flight routes for drones and missiles to bypass Russian air defense. Therefore, enemy single and group raids will continue.

Image
Tonight, a UAV was shot down in the Ferzikovsky district of the Kaluga region . According to the head of the region , Vladislav Shapsha , the object was hit at 2.30, there were no victims or infrastructure damage.


Russian EW assets landed and jammed two Ukrainian drones in Kursk Oblast . On one of them was the symbols of a terrorist organization - the Azov Regiment.

Image
The Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to attack the settlements of the Belgorod region . Air defense systems worked in Belgorod : an aircraft-type UAV was shot down on approach to the city. According to preliminary data, there were no casualties or damage. In addition, there is information about the shelling of the village of Vyazovoe in the Krasnoyaruzhsky district .

Image
Today, Ukrainian formations once again fired at the largest cities of the Donetsk People's Republic: the main blows again fell on Donetsk and Gorlovka . In Yasinovataya , the Armed Forces of Ukraine hit a residential building, after which the building caught fire. Victims and injured were avoided.


Ukrainian formations continue artillery terror on the left bank of the Kherson region . Today it became known that in the New Camps , as a result of shelling this weekend, administrative buildings, a feldsher-obstetric station and a transformer were damaged. In Korsunka - residential buildings and outbuildings. At night Novaya Kakhovka and Kakhovka, Podstepnoe and Gornostaevka were fired upon .

Political events
On the supply of German Taurus missiles to the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Image
The German publication Der Spiegel writes that the Cabinet of Ministers has reached a consensus on the transfer of long-range Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine . Their possible delivery to the Ukrainian Air Force was discussed back in May. At that time , this idea was officially abandoned in Berlin , however, after the Storm Shadow / SCALP appeared in the Armed Forces of Ukraine , sending the Tauruses was a matter of time. The official position of the Bundeswehr could only be a demonstrative postponement: while in Germany they were talking about the unwillingness to give the Kyiv regime missiles, in fact, the Ukrainian bombers were being finalized with might and main for their use.

Despite the supply of British and French missiles to Ukraine, their number is still limited, which is expressed by a very scrupulous selection of targets for strikes. The appearance of Taurus in the conflict will expand the arsenal of high-precision weapons of the enemy and increase the range of destruction of targets up to 500 km.

On trade in organs of Ukrainian citizens

The authors of the @pr0spektus channel reported that a number of Ukrainian businessmen living in Italy, with the support of the Kiev administration, organized a channel for the supply of human organs from Ukraine to Turkey . According to them, in June of this year, the Ukrainian authorities and representatives of the Turkish Ministry of Health reached an agreement according to which Ukrainians will transport organs in refrigerated wagons and sell them at lower prices than on the European black market.

Author @UkraineHumanRightsAbuses believes that the agreement coincided well with the counter-offensive, which leads to the mass death of Ukrainian militants. This will allow organs to be sold abroad without the consent of their relatives. Shortly before the special operation, in December 2021, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine passed a law allowing the removal of organs from the dead without notarized consent from them or their official representatives. The term "official" is vague - it can be a person who takes responsibility for the funeral. In military conditions, it may be the commander of the unit.

And given that such a product is in demand and brings a lot of money, this will become one of the sources of illegal enrichment. This practice has been known around the world, as well as the fact that Ukraine has been a source, transit and destination country for human trafficking since the early 1990s.

Against this background, it is curious that Poland , by the way, has repeatedly complained about the lack of systematic protection and security measures in relation to human trafficking and other exploitation of refugees. With the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine and the massive influx of Ukrainian refugees, the number of cases of human trafficking has increased significantly in the EU countries .

Due to the fact that the Polish authorities did not take on the main burden of distributing refugees, all responsibility passed to volunteers and activists. In this regard, periodically there are reports that some activists, instead of transporting displaced persons to their place of residence, took them in an unknown direction. Most of the data concerned women and children, the most vulnerable and exploited among the refugees.

However, the Polish government is not the only one that does not have proper state regulation in this matter - therefore, similar reports were received from the Slovak and Romanian borders. I will keep silent about what wild stories sometimes come from Hungary .

At the same time, it is not in vain that colleagues mention Turkey in the context of the sale of organs: according to last year, the price of one kidney on the black market in Poland was only 30,000 zlotys (≈714 thousand rubles), while in Turkey this organ can cost about PLN 450,000 (over 10.7 million rubles).

On the results of the summit in Jeddah

According to a number of Western media, the meeting to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, which took place on August 5-6 in Saudi Arabia , differed significantly from a similar event in Copenhagen .

As we wrote earlier, this time Kiev and its partners did not particularly insist on the adoption of the so-called "Zelensky formula" , which included a clause on the withdrawal of Russian troops from the borders of Ukraine at the time of 1991 before the start of peace negotiations. At the meeting, Kyiv rather demonstrated its readiness for compromises with the countries of the "Global South".

Despite the fact that there is little information about the results of the summit, it is known that some fundamental issues have not been resolved, and the contradictions in the positions between Ukraine and the countries of the "Global South" still persist. Thus, at the meeting, the main requirement of the Russian Federation - guarantees of Ukraine's neutrality and its non-entry into NATO - was almost completely ignored. The Western media believe that the need to take into account this item should be taken into account, China made it clear .

On the pressure on the UOC-MP

In Ukraine, Metropolitan Jonathan of the UOC-MP was sentenced to five years in prison for the so-called “public justification of armed aggression against Ukraine . ” The pressure on the priests of the canonical Church in the country continues.

Meanwhile, Metropolitan Pavel, the abbot of the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra from the UOC-MP, was released from custody on bail of $900,000. According to lawyer Nikita Chekman, more than a thousand people collected these funds for the release of the priest.

Rybar

(Other images at link.)

https://rybar.ru/hronika-speczialnoj-vo ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator

******

Postscript to the Ukraine peace gathering in Jeddah
August 7, 2023

As I anticipated, the BBC reported briefly this morning that the gathering in Jeddah over the weekend to discuss Ukrainian proposals for peace ended without any concrete results. This did not prevent today’s edition of The Financial Times from calling it a success because of the attendance by China and China’s affirmation that it will participate in such discussions in the future. I further expect that the same kind of Big Lie claim of victory in what is in reality a blatant defeat will be attempted by the United States and its allies when the Russians recapture Kharkov, the Ukraine’s second largest city, and snatch up the whole of the remaining Ukrainian coastline on the Black Sea by overrunning Nikolayev and Odessa. This could come in as little as a couple of months from now, given the near destruction of Ukrainian strategic reserves these past couple of months and plans of the Kremlin to go on the offensive once the Ukrainian counter-offensive abates and before the onset of the rainy season in autumn, which works against large scale military operations..

What rabbits will Jake Sullivan, Blinken and his colleagues at the State Department try to pull out of a hat then? What will happen then is also now taking shape. The Poles, with U.S. encouragement, will move into Lvov and Western Ukraine in what is called a defensive deployment of peacekeepers to prevent further Russian aggression and the United States will say that it has preserved Ukrainian sovereignty in the face of overwhelming Russian military force and the incompetence of Zelensky and his generals. We may safely assume that Zelensky will have been physically ‘neutralized’ by that point to avoid his whining about U.S. treachery to the global press.

The problem for the Biden administration is that it will put forward these transparently phony claims of victory in the midst of the 2024 presidential campaign, when its Big Lie will come under fierce attack from the Republicans Donald Trump and Ron Desantis on the one hand and on the other hand from Robert F. Kennedy in the Democratic camp.

Meanwhile, as regards the costs to the EU Member States of their foolhardy subordination to Washington on sanctioning Russia, we can thank The Financial Times for its article today putting figures on the losses booked by energy companies, banks and other major businesses which sold their Russian operations under fire sale conditions or have seen them confiscated by the Russian state as compensation for Western seizures of Russian state and private assets in the EU. In the best of circumstances, they retained title but have been required to report the assets they still own as ‘impaired’ for accounting purposes since no dividends or principal can be transferred abroad. The number offered by the FT is over 100 billion euros in losses. Add to that the economic losses to the general population in the EU due to vastly inflated energy costs following the turn away from Russian hydrocarbons. The FT says nothing about that, but I would guess it exceeded 200 billion euros if we take only the publicly reported ameliorative measures of Germany and several other EU countries to compensate individuals and companies for the energy price shock.

The net result of these Western losses approaches the Russian financial losses in Europe and America. So where is the Western ‘win’ in its ‘sanctions from hell’ applied to Russia?

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2023

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2023/08/07/ ... in-jeddah/

******
.
Country to donate
August 8, 11:22

Image

Country to donate

Right before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, told lawmakers that Kyiv could fall within 72 hours if there was a full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. But why, if the United States expected the collapse of Ukraine, did NATO stop the impending conflict by admitting that NATO had no intention of accepting Ukraine into the alliance? Then Moscow's security problems caused by NATO's eastward expansion would be resolved, and Putin would have no reason to attack Ukraine.

Isn't that what is expected of an alliance whose stated mission is:

NATO is an active and leading contributor to international peace and security. It promotes democratic values ​​and is committed to the peaceful resolution of disputes.

But after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization launched its activities around the world on a wave of ideological exaltation to rebuild the world around Western values. The world has witnessed the implementation of a new NATO mission in the Balkans, Lebanon, Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and now Ukraine.

After the humiliating defeat in Afghanistan, NATO needed another war to justify its existence. This war was supposed to contrast with previous NATO misadventures. It will be sharp and short, without losses from the West. And this time, NATO will win.


NATO leaders seemed to relish the prospect of war. When in December 2021, in a last-ditch effort, Putin demanded that NATO stop eastward expansion and promised not to admit Ukraine into NATO, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg arrogantly dismissed any discussion of the issue.

Nothing prevented Zelensky from avoiding war as well. If he had abandoned his request to join NATO, this would have satisfied Moscow's demands and the invasion would have been called off. However, the corrupt rulers in Kyiv were not motivated by concern for the stability and integrity of Ukraine. They were driven by billions in financial and military aid and unlimited prospects for personal enrichment.

Some Europeans, relying on their own strength to avenge centuries of defeat and humiliation, saw an opportunity for retribution, especially without direct military intervention. Biden hoped to get out of Afghanistan and turn the Ukraine crisis into a turning point in his presidency.

Ironically, everyone but Putin wanted this war.

Indeed, NATO has developed an audacious gambit. The strategy was that America and its allies would instigate an invasion by Moscow and use it as an excuse to impose devastating sanctions on Russia. The sanctions were supposed to hurt the Russian economy and create internal pressure on President Putin to step down from power. Putin's departure would create a power vacuum that would weaken Russia geopolitically. What happened to Ukraine didn't matter; it served as bait.


However, NATO's strategic geniuses failed again. Ukraine did not collapse, the sanctions did not achieve the desired result, and NATO was drawn into the war with Russia by proxy.

This sobering reality forced NATO to reassess the conflict and develop a new strategy. The current strategy focuses on a prolonged war of attrition to weaken Russia economically and militarily and force a sort of capitulation on Russia. As war rages on Ukrainian soil, Ukraine is paying a devastating human and economic price. About half of the 35 million people left the country or were killed or incapacitated. Its infrastructure, which took some 200 years to build, is crumbling, its economy is nearly devastated, and what used to be the breadbasket of Europe has recently passed a marijuana law.

The country is in a state of material poverty, the survival of which depends on international assistance. Zelensky walks around the world with outstretched hands, begging for military and economic assistance. It is a shame that this suffering country with a well-educated population has become a country of beggars. Zelensky even dresses like a beggar.

Zelensky believes that since he is promoting the interests of the West, there should be mutual obligations. He sees the country's salvation in joining NATO and the EU, adoption and international prosperity. In addition, he expects the West to offer hundreds of billions of dollars for restoration.

The recent NATO meeting in Vilnius, Lithuania, added cold water to Zelenskiy's aspirations. As cemeteries across Ukraine are rapidly running out of space, NATO has refused to even extend an invitation to membership. Zelensky, who has been chasing NATO membership like a greyhound chasing a mechanical rabbit (video here), seemed to realize that the dream of Ukraine ever becoming a NATO member had evaporated and strongly expressed his disappointment with the NATO leadership.

But NATO leaders, who are quite content to avoid a confrontation with a nuclear power and let the Ukrainians fight, did not take Zelenskiy's outburst lightly. Some are unhappy that Ukraine withstood the initial Russian attack. According to General Mark Miley, NATO did not even plan for the existence of an independent Ukraine.

So when a vassal dared to raise his voice against his feudal lords, President Biden had to put him in his place. “The bad news for you is that we're not going anywhere. You're stuck with us," he told Zelensky. In undiplomatic English, you assholes will keep fighting as long as we supply weapons or you supply supplies, whichever runs out first. You have nowhere to go.

Although both sides eventually agreed to new arms commitments and confirmed continued economic assistance, the NATO meeting robbed Zelensky of the immediate political payoff he was seeking. Zelenskiy, however, could not return home empty-handed from such a challenging journey. “We are returning home with a good result for our country and, very importantly, for our warriors,” he said in a video released after his return. However, inspiring oratory will not change the fate of Ukraine. By allowing Ukraine to get involved in a conflict with Russia, Zelensky has committed one of the greatest folly that can be committed by a head of state. As a result, Ukraine will join the list of countries that America has left in ruins.

Henry Kissinger wrote after the debacle in Vietnam: "To be America's enemy can be dangerous, but to be a friend is deadly." Zelenskiy is in the process of figuring this out. And there is another lesson from Vietnam that he should keep in mind. On November 2, 1963, Ngo Dinh Diem, the president of South Vietnam whose policies were causing discontent in Washington, was assassinated in a US-backed coup d'état.

Although more blood has been spilled in Ukraine so far than in all European conflicts since World War II combined, the organization “committed to the peaceful resolution of disputes” has shown no willingness to discuss a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

Moreover, German Foreign Minister Anna-Helena Berbock rejected the possibility of negotiating with Russia. Like most European leaders, she does not study history; otherwise, she would have followed the advice of her great compatriot Otto von Bismarck, who wrote: “The secret of politics? Make a good deal with Russia.”

Alexander G. Markovsky is a Senior Fellow at the London Center for Policy Studies, a conservative think tank that studies national security, energy, risk analysis and other public policy issues. He is the author of Anatomy of a Bolshevik and Liberal Bolshevism: America Didn't Beat Communism, She Embraced It. Mr. Markovsky is the owner and CEO of Litwin Management Services, LLC.

https://www.americanthinker.com/ - original in English

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8552835.html

Google Translator

******

Image

Ex-CIA analyst: UK excuse of shrubbery for failed counteroff. ‘stupid’
Originally published: Al Mayadeen on August 6, 2023 by Sputnik (more by Al Mayadeen) | (Posted Aug 08, 2023)

Former U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) analyst Larry Johnson called the UK military’s claim that shrubbery was stopping Ukraine’s efforts in their counteroffensive operation “stupid,” and “ignorant.”

In a Youtube interview, Johnson sarcastically remarked that all the United States had to do to ensure Ukraine’s success was “to provide them with a brigade of weed whackers, so they could have gone out there and cut down all the weeds.”

Johnson elaborated that the claims the UK was making were “nonsensical—you’ve got to wonder how in the world can alleged professional military people in Britain say something so stupid, so incredibly ignorant that they want to blame it [Ukraine’s failed counteroffensive] on summer growth.”

Days ago, the UK Defense Ministry attempted to hide Ukraine’s publicly well-documented failures on “undergrowth regrowing” in south Ukraine, calling it the reason for “slow progress of combat.”

In July, Bild newspaper reported, citing a confidential German intelligence assessment, that Ukraine’s counter-offensive is facing challenges due to poor execution of tactics.

The ministry said that the region’s agricultural land had been “left fallow for 18 months, with the return of weeds and shrubs accelerating under the warm, damp summer conditions.”

The UK ministry claims this gives Russian defense an edge, and hampers Ukraine’s mine-sweeping operations, explaining in the intelligence brief how “Although undergrowth can also provide cover for small stealthy infantry assaults, the net effect has been to make it harder for either side to make advances.”

In June, Ukraine claimed its forces were moving along in its counteroffensive but were battling to counter Russian air and artillery power, which was impeding their advances in the east and south.

On July 31, American political scientist John Mearsheimer said in an interview transcribed by The Grayzone that he was surprised at the West’s encouragement for the Ukrainians’ counteroffensive, which he compared to a suicide attack that would lead to counterproductive results.

“It seems to me that anybody who knows anything about military tactics and strategy had to understand that there was hardly any chance that the Ukrainian counteroffensive would succeed,” he stated.

https://mronline.org/2023/08/08/ex-cia- ... ff-stupid/

******

MILITARY SITUATION IN DONBASS ON AUGUST 7, 2023 (MAP UPDATE)

Image

Nine civilians were wounded as a result of Ukrainian shelling in Donetsk and Staromikhailovka over the past day;
Russian artillery struck AFU positions near Dibrova;
Russian artillery struck AFU positions near Raigorodok;
Russian artillery destroyed a command post of the AFU near Yampol;
The Russian Army repelled Ukrainian attacks near Stelmakhovka;
The Russian Army repelled Ukrainian attacks near Serebryanske;
Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue near Kleshcheevka;
Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue near Staromayorske;
Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue in Mariinka;
Up to 65 Ukrainian militants, 2 armoured fighting vehicles and 1 D-30 howitzer were destroyed in Krasny Liman area, according to the Russian MOD;
Up to 135 servicemen, 2 tanks, 6 infantry vehicle, 3 motor vehicles, 3 artillery systems were destroyed in Donetsk countryside, according to the Russian MOD;
Up to 80 Ukrainian servicemen, 3 armored vehicles, 4 motor vehicles, 1 howitzer were destroyed in Zaporozhye region, according to the Russian MOD.

https://southfront.org/military-situati ... ap-update/

MILITARY SITUATION IN BAKHMUT ON AUGUST 7, 2023 (MAP UPDATE)

Image

Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue near Klishchiivka;
Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue near Andriivka;
Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue near Khromove;
Clashes between the Russian Army and the AFU continue near Berkhivka.

https://southfront.org/military-situati ... ap-update/

RUSSOPHOBIC POLICIES INCREASING IN LATVIA

Image

Written by Lucas Leiroz, journalist, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, geopolitical consultant

The wave of Russophobia in NATO and the EU is nothing new. Western states have been fomenting anti-Russian animosity for years and this situation is already starting to reach truly intolerable levels of persecution. In a recent announcement in Riga, it was revealed that the government will soon be issuing orders to thousands of Russian citizens to leave the country. As a post-Soviet state, Latvia has a significant number of ethnic Russians among its population, but apparently this is no reason for the pro-Western government to avoid persecuting its own residents.

This statement was made by Ingmars Lindaka, head of the parliamentary committee on citizenship and migration, during an interview with Lithuanian state media. He said that after receiving the orders, Russians will have 90 days to leave Lithuania, otherwise they will be considered illegal migrants. According to him, these thousands of Russians are those who have not expressed interest in participating in the exams to obtain permanent residency certificates. These exams include tests of Latvian language, which has discouraged many Russians from taking part. Lindaka says those who have not been tested are illegally in the country and should be treated according to [recently imposed] Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs’ (PMLP) rules.

“Roughly 5,000 to 6,000, according to my estimates. These are people who have shown no desire – neither to take the exam nor obtain a temporary residence permit. These are the silent ones. If we look at the law as it currently stands, PMLP must send a notice to leave the country within three months”, Lindaka told journalists.

Other officials later confirmed the statement. Spokespersons for the Ministry of the Interior of Latvia informed the news agency “Elta” that “around 6,000” Russians are to receive official notification from the State in September.

“If a person does not have the right to stay in the country, they must leave for a country where they have the right to stay. The time for departure is three months. So the person can leave without haste. If a person continues to stay in Latvia illegally, there may come a moment when state structures find out about it and, accordingly, remind them of the need to leave. Criminal liability is not provided, but administrative liability is. The person may be fined,” Vilnis Vitolins, the Deputy Secretary of State of the Ministry of Interior Affairs, said.

As well as the other Baltic states, Poland and Ukraine, Latvia has a serious problem of racism against Russian citizens. Since Latvia’s independence from the USSR, there has been a strong growth in anti-Russian sentiments in the country. The resentful mentality towards the Soviet past and the revanchist ideology against the Russian Federation have been encouraged by Riga’s western partners as a way to mobilize the country’s population against NATO’s geopolitical enemies. For this reason, since 1991, ethnic Russians have been denied Latvian citizenship, increasing social polarization.

All this has worsened significantly since last year, when, in response to Russia’s special military operation, the Latvian government launched a series of racist de-Russification policies. Monuments honoring Soviet WWII heroes have been demolished, with the state classifying the memory of the war as a symbol of “occupation”. In August last year, then Latvian President Egils Levits also stated that all Russians in the country should be “isolated” for reasons of “national security”, given the conflict in Ukraine.

To avoid getting into legal problems, 1.8 million Russian ethnic citizens (around 25% of the country’s population) have been forced since 2022 to take Latvian language exams. If they prove fluency in the language, these citizens gain the right to stay in the country, but if they do not pass, they are forced to leave. This is an uncomfortable situation as Russian has been commonly spoken in Latvian territory for many decades, as this language was already official in that territory during the Soviet era. For this reason, many of the Russians who live there cannot pass the exam, since they have no skills in Latvian, being now considered criminals for simply speaking only Russian.

Recently, the case of a 74-year-old Russian woman went viral on the internet. Even though she has lived her entire life in Latvia speaking Russian, the pensioner is now required to prove skills in the Latvian language to avoid expulsion and loss of government social benefits. Thousands of other Soviet-era seniors are in a similar situation. This has already generated protests and has been considered by Russia as a case of cultural genocide, but Riga still seems willing to advance the agenda of de-Russification.

In fact, what is happening in Latvia is absolutely intolerable from a humanitarian point of view. A quarter of the country is being coerced into speaking a new language to avoid being expelled from the territory where they have lived their entire lives. These cultural genocide policies often precede the implementation of physical persecution against the “isolated”, “undesirable” citizens. So, it is possible that Latvia will soon take more serious Nazi-like measures, just as Ukraine did in 2014.

This tends only to further aggravate tensions in Europe, as the “right to protect” citizens abroad is an important and recognized principle in contemporary international law. Certainly, Moscow will do everything in its power to prevent its citizens from being mistreated in other countries.

https://southfront.org/russophobic-poli ... in-latvia/

NATO AGGRESSION AGAINST RUSSIA BECOMES TOTAL WAR

Image

Written by Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst

On the night of August 4, the Kiev regime launched a sea drone attack against a Russian tanker. Luckily, the resulting damage was insufficient to sink the ship or cause any casualties among the 11 crew members, but it did hinder its operation. The attack happened at about 23:20 just south of the Kerch Strait, according to a statement by Russia’s Federal Agency for Sea and Inland Water Transport. The vessel was later identified as the chemical tanker SIG. The Russian maritime agency detailed that there is a hole “near the waterline on the starboard side, presumably as a result of a sea drone attack” and confirmed there were no casualties.

It’s important to note that the SIG is sanctioned by the United States for transporting jet fuel to the Russian military in Syria, making American involvement in the attack almost a certainty, particularly at a time when Washington DC’s aggression against Damascus is escalating. The targeting information was most likely provided by US ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) platforms which then relayed this to the SBU or the Neo-Nazi junta forces. The move aims to hamper vital Russian logistics in Syria, particularly operations by the VKS (Russian Aerospace Forces) which is regularly intercepting US/NATO aircraft illegally entering Syrian airspace.

To further conceal direct US involvement, the Kiev regime openly boasted about the attack, which is highly unusual given the fact that it normally maintains plausible deniability in the aftermath of such actions. According to NBC, “the tanker was transporting fuel for the Russian troops,” citing sources and adding that “it was well loaded” and that “the ‘fireworks’ could be seen from afar”. They said that a surface drone and TNT had been used to carry out the attack. A video was also released and shared by several Neo-Nazi junta officials, showing a sea drone moving towards the tanker, although it cuts just before reaching the ship, suggesting the explosion followed immediately after.

“Any explosions that happen with the ships of the Russian Federation or the Crimean Bridge is an absolutely logical and effective step in relation to the enemy,” the head of the SBU Vasyl Malyuk posted on Telegram, adding: “If the Russians want the explosions to stop, they should use the only option for this — to leave the territorial waters of Ukraine.”

Several hours before the attack on SIG, another sea drone damaged the “Olenogorsky Gornyak” landing ship, just off the port of Novorossiysk, one of Russia’s major export hubs. Coupled with attacks on tankers, such actions are obviously designed to hinder Moscow’s oil sales as the so-called “price cap” turned out to be a miserable failure, with even US vassals such as Japan ignoring it. By targeting Russian tankers and major ports, the US is hoping to stop or at least hamper oil sales. This is also connected to the issue of insurance for Russian vessels, meaning there would be no compensation in case of such attacks, possibly prompting other tankers to halt transporting Russian oil.

On the other hand, drone strikes on Russian cities aim to disrupt normal economic activity and discredit Russian authorities, probably in hopes of causing unrest of some kind. On August 6, Moscow’s Vnukovo airport was forced to temporarily halt all flights due to a failed drone attack. The Russian military’s electronic warfare (EW) assets downed the drone in the Podolsk region of the Moscow suburbs. The attack could have caused untold damage had it reached the airport, jeopardizing the lives of thousands of civilians. Since major drone attacks on buildings in Moscow (including the Kremlin itself), the Russian military strengthened its air defenses in and around Moscow, including by placing “Pantsir” SAM (surface-to-air missile) systems on rooftops.

Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin wrote on Telegram: “Today at around 11:00 AM, a drone attempted to break through to Moscow. It was destroyed on the approach by air defenses. Well done, military.”

Drone attacks on civilian infrastructure are absolutely irrelevant to Russian military operations in Ukraine, meaning they are either an act of desperation (as the Kiev regime’s much-touted counteroffensive has been an absolute debacle) or the United States is simply trying to launch a total war against Russia, as its economy has proved to be virtually impervious to political West’s unrelenting sanctions warfare. Another proof that the economic siege of Russia has failed spectacularly is the fact that the Eurasian giant’s economy will grow 1.5% this year, according to an assessment by the IMF. This “unpleasant surprise” most likely prompted the political West to take “concrete action” in order to prevent such a scenario, as its own economic prospects are not looking so good.

Namely, although President Joe Biden vowed to “turn the ruble into rubble” just last year, this has proven to be nothing more than a fantasy, as the Russian economy is now outperforming those of its adversaries, the same ones enforcing the sanctions. Unable to face Moscow in a fair fight, be it militarily, economically or otherwise, the political West is left with underhanded tactics such as biological warfare, evident terrorist attacks and even covert nuclear proliferation. As previously mentioned, all this can only be described by two words – total war. And while it inevitably results in damage for Moscow on a tactical level, strategically and historically, Russia has never lost such confrontations, as evidenced by the last attempt by a certain failed painter with a peculiar mustache.

https://southfront.org/nato-aggression- ... total-war/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply