Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri May 06, 2022 1:20 pm

LIVE: US Provided Intel on Russian Cruiser Moscow - CNN

Image
Russian cruiser Moskva | Photo: Wikipedia

Published 5 May 2022

CNN has reported that the United States had provided Ukraine with some information that allegedly allowed Kiev to strike the Russian cruiser Moskva, citing sources.

On May 5, the Ukrainian conflict continues with no sign of a solution. However, Russia will keep a humanitarian corridor open from Thursday to Saturday for the evacuation of civilians from the Azovstal plant. Below are the main developments of this conflict as they happen:

CNN reports that US provided intel that helped Ukraine target Russian cruiser "Moskva"

CNN has reported that the United States had provided Ukraine with some information that allegedly allowed Kiev to strike the Russian cruiser Moskva, citing sources.

According to them, the Ukrainian military received intelligence data from the Americans on the location of the Russian Navy cruiser Moskva. Meanwhile, the report notes that it is unknown whether the U.S. knew that Ukraine would strike the ship. According to the sources, Washington was not involved in this decision.

As the TV channel's interlocutors noted, there are clear limits on what the U.S. will share with Kiev.

Thus, it is stressed that Washington has so far refused to provide Ukraine with information about potential targets inside Russia itself.

In addition, the U.S. rejects information that it has provided Ukraine with intelligence on the location of specific Russian military commanders.

"We do not provide intelligence on the location of senior military leaders on the battlefield or participate in the targeting decisions of the Ukrainian military," Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told reporters Thursday.

Earlier, the New York Times cited senior U.S. administration officials as saying that the United States had provided intelligence to the Ukrainian armed forces, which they used to eliminate high-ranking officers of the Russian Armed Forces.

On the night of April 14, the Russian Defense Ministry reported a fire on the cruiser Moskva, the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. It was officially announced that the detonation of ammunition caused the fire and the ship was seriously damaged. Late in the evening of April 14, the ministry said that the ship sank while being towed.

Neo-Nazis detained in South Russia employed tactics of Ukrainian terrorists

Six people, detained in South Russia’s Rostov Region on suspicion of participating or organizing an extremist group, employed the tactics of a Ukrainian terrorist group, the Russian Interior Ministry’s Rostov Region department has said.

"Officers of the anti-extremism center of the Russian Interior Ministry’s Rostov Region department, jointly with the regional department of the Federal Security Service (FSB), have stopped operations of an extremist group. Its members and organizers employed the tactics, used by a terrorist organization, outlawed in Russia, whose internet sites and forums are administered by governmental organizations controlled by Ukraine’s military and political leadership," the department’s press service said.

According to the report, the group carried out its first act of extremism in the city of Shakhty in October 2021, vandalizing a World War II memorial and a mass grave in the city. In 2022, they set a cafe on fire. They also painted Nazi symbols on government buildings.

The group also carried out a series of ethnicity-motivated attacks in Novocherkassk and Rostov-on-Don, in which at least one person was seriously injured.

"The miscreants made videos of their unlawful actions and disseminated those videos on social networks with the goal of recruiting new members. They also disseminated information related to Neo-Nazism, as well as symbols of Nazi Germany," the press service said.

A community with restricted access was created in an internet messenger, allowing the group’s members from various cities and towns of the Rostov Regions to communicate.

During searches at apartments of the group's members, police seized firearms, telescopic sights, knuckles and expandable steel batons, as well as mobile devices and information storage devices.

The Federal Security Service’s office in the Rostov Region said earlier this week a group of young people had been detained on suspicion of neo-Nazism-motivated crimes. The group’s leaders have been charged with setting up an extremist group, other members - with participating in an extremist group. Six members of were placed in custody and one remains under house arrest.

Hostilities in Ukraine can be over within week, but West does not want this - Lukashenko

The hostilities in Ukraine can be over in just one week, but the West does not want it to happen, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko has said.

"I see that Ukraine was not inclined to solve problems step by step, and this led to a war. So when you speak of some atrocities in Ukraine, you should address those questions to Poland, in the first place, to the United States, to the United Kingdom. If you - the United States and the United Kingdom - are interested in seeing the end of the war in Ukraine, this can be done within a week, maybe even earlier. But you are not interested in that," he was quoted as saying by the state-run Belta news agency, in an interview to Associated Press.

Russia ready to resume strategic discussions with US when Washington is - ambassador

Russia will be prepared to resume its strategic consultations with the United States when Washington is ready, Russian Ambassador to the US Anatoly Antonov said in an article for Newsweek.

The ambassador emphasized that thanks to Russia’s efforts, the New START treaty was extended for five years in February 2021.

In his words, the agreement is "a universally recognized gold standard in the sphere of maintaining strategic stability and transparency between the major nuclear powers."

"Russia has repeatedly drawn the attention of the United States that it is important to continue the joint work on an agreement that could replace New START and accommodate new realities of international security and development of military technologies," he continued.

"Regrettably, Washington has unilaterally 'frozen' the bilateral strategic stability dialogue that was launched at the Geneva summit, thus jeopardizing the prospects of keeping the foundation of arms control in place," the Russian diplomat added. "Russia is ready to resume the consultations as soon as the United States is ready.".

Ukraine will stop Russian gas transit if the European Union (EU) decrees embargo. The chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament's Energy Committee Andriy Gerus said that his country is ready to immediately stop Russian gas transit if the EU decides to impose an embargo.

He hopes that European countries will endorse the sixth package of sanctions against Russia, which was presented by the European Commission (EC) and includes a gradual oil embargo.

The Ukrainian lawmaker asked the Europeans to start preparing a seventh package of sanctions as Russia "must understand" the war in Ukraine has a high cost.

Ukraine won't agree to "frozen conflict" with Russia. President Volodymyr Zelensky said that Kiev will not agree to any deal that would lead to a "frozen conflict" with Russia, the Ukrinform news agency reported.

"We will not settle for a frozen conflict... I am against it. We will definitely not have such a document," Zelensky said, adding that the Minsk agreements, which had put an end to the intense military stage of the Donbass conflict several years ago, proved to be ineffective.

Russia expels 7 Danish diplomats in a retaliatory move. The Ambassador of Denmark to Russia Carsten Sondergaard was summoned to the Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry in protest over Denmark's decision to declare 15 Russian employees working at the Russian Embassy in Denmark and the Russian Trade Representation in Copenhagen "personae non gratae.".

The seven diplomats were ordered to leave Russia in two weeks. Russia reserves the right to take additional retaliatory measures against future unfriendly actions.

Image

France announces US$2-billion-aid for Ukraine. So far this year, France has already given Ukraine $1.7 billion, President Emmanuel Macron recalled, adding that his country will contribute an additional US$300 million.

The announcement was made at the "International Donor Conference for Ukraine Support" held in Warsaw and hosted by Poland and Sweden. Over US$6.3 billion were raised at this event, Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki told reporters.

Russia opens a humanitarian corridor from Thursday to Saturday for the evacuation of civilians from the Azovstal plant. The corridor will be effective from 08:00 to 18:00 Moscow time, the Joint Coordination Headquarters of the Russian Federation for Humanitarian Response said. During this period, Russian troops and the forces of Donetsk will unilaterally cease hostilities and ensure the withdrawal of civilians both to Russia and to areas controlled by Ukraine, it added.

Two villages in Russia's Belgorod Region were shelled from Ukrainian territory. On Thursday, several power lines were damaged along with five houses, Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said, noting there were no civilian casualties.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/LIV ... -0011.html

UN Russian Envoy: Economic World War Taking Place

Image
UN: Russian envoy to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia said during a UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine that a world war is currently taking place at an economic level. | Photo: Twitter @btramsnews

Published 6 May 2022 (2 hours 14 minutes ago)

The Russian UN envoy noted there are vested interests in certain circles that have sought for a long time to transform Ukraine into a bridgehead for a battle with Russia.


The Russian permanent representative to the United Nations Vassily Nebenzia said during a UN Security Council meeting on Ukraine that a world war is currently taking place at an economic level in light of the measures taken against Russia in response to its special military operation in Ukraine.

Judging by the speed with which the economic war against Russia was unleashed, the West has been preparing for it for a long time, Nebenzia said on Thursday.

“This is not a war in Ukraine, contrary to what you say, this is a proxy war of the collective West against the Russian Federation. It is as if you were eagerly awaiting this moment to unleash repression against Russia. And if we were to talk about world war then, without a doubt, it is being waged at the economic level today,” Nebenzia said.

The Russian envoy noted there are vested interests in certain circles that have sought for a long time to transform Ukraine into a bridgehead for a battle with Russia, and they have done everything possible to achieve this goal ever since Ukraine became independent 30 years ago.


Nebenzia stressed that Russia does not hold any illusions at present or had in the past, about the plans by the West to have Ukraine become a member of NATO, as rampantly overlook Russia's proposals and suggestions regarding Europe's security.

On February 24, Russia launched a special military operation in Ukraine after the breakaway republics of Donetsk and Lugansk requested help in defending themselves from intensifying attacks by Ukrainian troops.

The Russian Ministry of Defense said the operation is targeting Ukrainian military infrastructure only. In response, Western nations imposed comprehensive sanctions against Russia.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/UN- ... -0003.html

Belarus Denounces NATO Doubling Forces in Eastern Europe

Image
In a further escalatory move, NATO plans to create attack groups near Belarus and Russia, further heightening tensions in Eastern Europe.. | Photo: Twitter @MayadeenEnglish

Published 6 May 2022

The Belarusian General Staff warned that NATO forces are concentrated on the borders of Russia and Belarus, which makes it possible for them to create attack groups.


The deputy chief of the Belarusian General Staff, Ruslan Kosygin, warned Thursday that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has doubled the number of its military forces in Eastern Europe.

The official said that Western countries stepped up activities to reinforce troops in Eastern Europe and the Southeast. "A considerable part of the forces and means, supposedly intended to strengthen the eastern flank of the alliance, have been transferred from the continental part of the United States," he specified.

According to Kosygin, "about 37,500 military personnel, including 24,500 foreign military personnel deployed in Poland and in the Baltic Sea countries are equipped with modern attack weapons, which is twice as much as the indicators for 2021".

Denouncing this situation, the deputy chief of the General Staff warned that NATO forces are concentrated on the borders of Russia and Belarus, which makes it possible for them to create strike groups in a short time.


"NATO forces are located near the borders of Russia and our country. It is possible to create strike groups on their base within the tightest deadlines for further use towards Belarus," Kosygin asserted in a statement released by the Telegram channel of the Belarusian Defense Ministry.

On the other hand, he also reported that they have registered large-scale military exercises on several European territories. "In 2020, there were 67 exercises, and in 2021 - 80 exercises. Since the beginning of this year, NATO forces and national armies have conducted 15 exercises," Kosygin detailed.

He also recalled that military exercises are currently being executed on territories of Central and Eastern Europe. "In fact, preparations are underway for combat operations in the eastern direction," he noted.

This is happening more than two months after the special military operation launched by Russia since February 24 for the defense of Donbas, denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Bel ... -0002.html

********************************************

Hungary warns of risks for the EU if Russian gas is banned

Image
The sanctions rejected by Hungary are part of a sixth package of sanctions that the European Union intends to apply to Russia. | Photo: Latina Presses
Published May 6, 2022 (49 minutes ago)

The Hungarian authority indicates that it depends 65 percent on Russian gas and cannot undertake a national investment in the sector.

The Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orbán, stressed this Friday the danger that vetoing the supply of gas and oil by Russia may entail for his country, as part of the sanctions that the European Union (EU) plans to impose on the Kremlin.

The European president referred to the impact as an "atomic bomb" that would damage the national economy of Hungary and to which they refuse, since they depend on 65 percent of the Russian resource.

"We would have to spend hundreds of billions of guilders to renew an oil refining system that we do not need now," stressed the head of government, referring to the cost in national currency that it represents for his nation.


Instead, he proposed reaching a new agreement that would avoid costly investments by European countries whose main oil and gas supply is Russia.

The sanctions on Russia rejected by the Hungarian governor are part of a sixth package of sanctions that the European Union intends to apply to Russian President Vladimir Putin as a reprimand for the military operation he is carrying out in Ukraine.

These restrictions were disclosed in a draft last Wednesday by the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen.

Hungary also rejected the proposal for sanctions against the rector of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who is being tried for supporting the decisions of the Russian government during the armed conflict.

On the other hand, the Secretary of State for International Communications, Zoltán Kovács, reported Thursday that Hungary will not help Ukraine by sending weapons. However, the Office of International Communications of the Prime Minister's Office has declared that it will offer Ukraine aid amounting to 37 million euros.


In economic matters, Orbán expressed that he does not want to confront the EU, "but to cooperate, but this is only possible if they take into account our interests".

The sixth package of sanctions presented by the president of the European Commission aims to sanction military officers involved in Russia's military action in Ukraine.

In addition, it disconnects three Russian banks from Swift, including Sberbank, the largest in the country, and prohibits the transmission in Europe of three Russian state broadcasters that, in the words of von der Leyden, "aggressively amplify Putin's lies and propaganda ”.

This week, Hungarian government spokesman Zoltán Kovács rejected the Russian gas ban, claiming there is “no plan or guarantee as to how a transition based on current proposals could be managed and how Hungary's energy security would be ensured”. .

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/hungria- ... -0009.html


UN sends convoy to evacuate civilians from Azovstal compound

Image
UN and Red Cross officials collaborate in the evacuation of civilians from the Ukrainian city of Mariupol. | Photo: @OCHA_Ukraine
Published May 6, 2022 (3 hours 29 minutes ago)

The UN operation comes amid a truce announced by Russia to allow the evacuation of civilians from the Azovstal industrial complex.

The Ukrainian city of Mariupol awaits the arrival on Friday of a new UN convoy for the evacuation of civilian refugees at the Azovstal steel mill.

The UN operation comes amid a 72-hour truce announced by Russian forces to allow civilians remaining in the industrial complex to leave.

The dispatch of UN trucks to the Azovstal industrial complex was announced Thursday by UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Martin Griffiths.


Over the weekend, an evacuation organized by the UN and the Red Cross made it possible to rescue a hundred civilians. On Wednesday, another 344 people were evacuated from the industrial compound, Ukrainian President Volodimir Zelensky said.


Information about humanitarian corridors is contradictory. While the Kremlin assures that they are working and that the truce is being respected, the Ukrainian president said Thursday night that Russian forces continue to attack the factory.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said he "remains ready" to ensure a "safe" evacuation of civilians, but urged nationalist militants still at the plant to lay down their weapons.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/mariupol ... -0006.html

Google Translator

***********************************

On the consequences of the destruction of the Kremenchug Oil Refinery
May 6, 13:59

Image

On the consequences of the destruction of the Kremenchug Oil Refinery.

Gauleiter of the Poltava region said that the Kremenchug Oil Refinery was completely destroyed as a result of a series of missile attacks by the Russian Armed Forces on the infrastructure of a strategic enterprise.

Of course, one should not take these statements on faith, perhaps some kind of fuel processing activity is still possible at the plant, and statements about complete destruction are made in order to avoid control finishing strikes.

The fact that the plant was badly damaged is a fact - in Ukraine, problems with fuel immediately worsened, and the prices for 92nd and 95th gasoline at gas stations immediately began to fly into space. But what about the complete destruction of the Kremenchug Oil Refinery still needs to be checked.

It is worth noting that if the attacks on the Kremenchug and Odessa refineries had been inflicted back in March, then the fuel crisis in Ukraine would have begun much earlier.
In fact, it has already become clear that Ukraine simply cannot compensate for the products of the Kremenchug refinery on its own.
Therefore, in the current situation, they are going to use gasoline supplies from Europe at European prices as a crutch. This will help avoid the lack of gasoline at civilian gas stations, but its prices will be from 70 to 110 hryvnia per liter.

Refineries are difficult (if not impossible) to restore. A new refinery for 2-4 million tons of oil costs about 350-500 million dollars.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7599363.html

Google Translator

*************************************************

WAR WAS UNAVOIDABLE
Rotislav Ishchenko

May 5, 2022 , 12:04 p.m.

Image
Russian Army Ka-52 Crocodile helicopter on deployment (Photo: Vitali Ankov/Sputnik)

According to Sun Tzu, war is the worst way to solve problems. Thousands of years of human history have proved the great Chinese right.

It is almost always possible to win without war. Also, in a war, as a rule, the side that would have won even without the war wins. Thus, war is a confirmation of previous calculations that requires many resources. Generally speaking, your result can be calculated in advance. Therefore, as a general rule, a war is started (or provoked, which is basically the same thing) by those who do not want to endure their inevitable political defeat and try to change the course of history by force.

For example, Stalin planned to complete the rearmament of the Red Army by 1942 and cover the borders safely. But, contrary to Hitler's conviction, he did not plan to attack the Reich. In full accordance with Marxist doctrine, Stalin (documents of the time, including his personal speeches, testify to this) was to adopt the position of "wise monkey" and watch from above as two imperialist predators destroy each other in the valley, and then kill them both.

At the same time, of course, he planned to take advantage of the reliance on Soviet neutrality by both sides of the conflict to constantly improve the geopolitical position of the USSR. This did not exclude the blackmail of small countries and "special military operations" against them, prepared a little better than the Finnish War of 1939-40. But Stalin did not plan to wage a real war against an equally powerful rival: the costs would have been too high and the result would have been the same (or even worse) than without any military action.

Similarly, Russia did not intend to start military operations in Ukraine. He would have been quite happy with the situation where the West would continue to spend money on maintaining the death throes of the Russophobic regime, depleting its own resources and only making the situation worse with Ukrainian statehood.

The only critical condition for Russia was to ensure security on the west side. Moreover, the security of not only Russia, but the entire Greater Eurasia project.

In the long term, the Russian-Chinese project has already surpassed the American-European one. And the life and well-being of several tens of thousands of Ukrainian Russophiles in the balance of history meant no more than the life and well-being of no less a number of Russian citizens (including those living in Donbas and Transnistria), threatened in event of the outbreak of hostilities. Moreover, in case of war (which has already been confirmed by practice), the danger for Ukrainian Russophiles also multiplied more than once.

From the point of view of the ruling elites in Washington, even a compromise agreement, which Russia and China were willing to accept, to avoid the danger of a larger war, was a defeat for the United States. The very need to recognize oneself as an equal among equals was seen by US elites as a disaster.

Thus, the United States took a turn, showing both Russia and China that there can be no talk of any security compromise. Border regimes controlled by Washington will be used solely to put pressure on the borders of their geopolitical opponents. And this pressure will increase in the future.

This made war inevitable. The only question was who would start it and where. There was a variant of a Polish attack on Belarus, supported by the Baltic States and Ukraine. There was the option of kyiv attacking the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics. The option of a joint attack by Ukraine and Moldova in Transnistria was present in the calculations rather virtually. Chisinau was very much afraid of the outbreak of hostilities and could only be forced to join the already ongoing war, but not to start it.

There was the option of an "explosion" in the Caucasus, but it was difficult for it to become a major conflict because Russia, Iran and Turkey had no interest in the large geopolitical players penetrating the region. Moscow, Tehran and Ankara, despite their differences, were interested in finding common ground to solve regional problems on the basis of a tripartite compromise, without the involvement of external forces.

A major conflict could start with an Israeli attack on Iran, but the overall balance of power in the Middle East, after Russia won the campaign in Syria, forced Tel Aviv to be extremely cautious. Finally, the conflict could break out on the Indo-Pakistani, Indo-Chinese border and also in Taiwan.

The main task of the United States was to tie down the Russian and Chinese forces in the conflict zone, force their geopolitical opponents to waste resources senselessly in an endless war of attrition, and stay out of the conflict zone and cut bonuses.

At that point, when the first phase of the special operation stalled and then moved on to the second, clearly with its sights set on a long military crisis, the United States decided that at least half the job was done. It only remained to draw China into a local war and then keep the temperature in both conflicts high enough to weaken geopolitical opponents, but not high enough for crises to spiral out of control and spontaneously escalate, threatening to become in a nuclear world war. On the Ukraine crisis, the United States even managed to make a statement, promising Russia a new Afghanistan.

War is a very bad and extremely risky undertaking, which, if possible, should be avoided, but if it has already begun, then one should fight for victory, which will bring greater dividends than a compromise peace treaty would have afforded in pre-war terms.

While in the first phase of the special operation Russia considered that its task was to force the West into a compromise peace (conditions were placed on the Ukrainian delegation in the negotiations), the second phase is being carried out with the aim of achieving the greatest success.

I have already written about the time factor and the danger of an uncontrolled escalation of the crisis due to the inability of the US elites. I will not go back to her. Now I will only focus on the positive aspects that Russia has already squeezed and can still squeeze out of the crisis.

First. The West (the United States, Great Britain, and France) at the official level was forced to admit that it was waging a war of annihilation against Russia. The West itself is engaged in economic, informational, logistical and material support of the conflict, Ukraine plays the role of the instrument of a hot war, and the states of Eastern Europe are waiting their turn to serve as firewood to keep warm.

This fundamentally changed our relationships. Before the current phase of the crisis, Russia's task was to convince the West of the need for compromise agreements. This is not naivety, as some not very educated but very exalted people think; These are the rules of the game. You can't play to the upside if you don't want to end up in a world war against your will a couple of weeks after the start of the crisis.

Human experience shows that it is more advantageous to adopt a moderate position and demand negotiations to reach a global agreement, even if one is aware of the impossibility of reaching an agreement due to the lack of constructiveness of the adversary. The enemy is forced to respond to your proposals, you throw him off the precalculated pace of the crisis, the agreed measures become discordant and the allies fall out of favour. You can't win this way, but you can make your opponent nervous and make mistakes, which is the first step towards your victory.

With the beginning of the current phase of the crisis, Russia has started a war to win. Lavrov correctly says that all wars end with a peace treaty. Only here we previously proposed a peace treaty without war, and now our Foreign Minister emphasizes that the conditions for peace will depend on the outcome of the war, which our Western "friends and partners" declared to us, not us.

We have moved from a more complex (political and diplomatic) level of relations with "partners" to a simpler (military) one. We lose in political maneuverability, but we gain in social mobilization (simple tasks are clearer to ordinary people and do not arouse unnecessary suspicion), and we also gain momentum in the party.

Second. We force both the collective West and the entire world to decide which side a certain country is on. At the same time, we have declared a more constructive approach to defining allies than the United States. The Americans declared: "Whoever is not with us is against us," and we: "Whoever is not against us is with us."

As a result, not only did most of the world end up on our side (it is easier to maintain neutrality than to rebuild to please one of the warring parties), but even a NATO and European Union country like Hungary, which seems support sanctions, also maintains and tries to develop trade relations with Russia.

Even a NATO country like Turkey, the most important American partner on the bloc's southern flank, without whose support NATO cannot fight not only in the Black Sea, but even in the eastern Mediterranean, is trying to play its game, earning bonuses in relations with both parties to the conflict. In our ranking, Ankara is an ally; in the American, it is an adversary.

As a result, the "international community" has been reduced to a Euro-Anglo-Saxon bloc plus Japan and the Republic of Korea and has become an object of ridicule. The "civilized world" suddenly saw its economic and financial systems (not ours) crumble, its sources of raw materials out of reach, and many of its promising markets closed to it.

The West, once slowly sliding, began to collapse into a crisis worse than during the Great Depression.

Third. Within Russia, not only the fifth column fully manifested itself. He also left the country almost completely. The West has lost thousands of experienced influencers. The level of consolidation of the Russian elite has increased, their mutual understanding and interaction with society has grown.

All these positive aspects of the current crisis practically guarantee us a political victory. The problem, however, is that the crisis has already turned into a military crisis. Therefore, also on the battlefield there must be a victory that at least our own society recognizes as such.

Well, the main price we pay (and pays all of humanity) for all this splendor is the greater risk of an uncontrolled development of the crisis. So much so that even Lavrov was forced to declare the growing danger of nuclear war.

We can take comfort in the fact that we did not choose such a risky path; it was imposed on us. Until the last moment, we offered to make a good deal.

https://misionverdad.com/traducciones/l ... inevitable

Google Translator

*************************************************

Russian UN Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia: “This is Not a War in Ukraine, but a Proxy War Between the Collective West and Russia”
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MAY 5, 2022

Image

Statement by Permanent Representative Nebenzia at the UN Security Council Meeting on the Situation in Ukraine

Madam President,

First, we would like to congratulate the United States on its assumption of the presidency of the Security Council in May. We trust that, unlike before, your presidency will be effective and impartial, as should be typical of a Security Council president when he or she is in office and not acting in a national capacity.

We are forced to say a few words for the record about the participation of High Commissioner for Human Rights, Ms. Bachelet, in today’s meeting in her capacity as a sheriff. Without going into the substance of what she said or her one-sided assessments, to which we had many questions, I would like to remind both colleagues and the High Commissioner herself that, according to UNGA resolution 48/141, which established the mandate of the High Commissioner, this official is primarily responsible, under the guidance and auspices of the Secretary-General, for United Nations human rights activities within the overall competencies, powers and decisions of the General Assembly, ECOSOC and Human Rights Council. No other matters relating to the maintenance of international peace and security or the protection of civilians fall within his competence.

Madam President,

For two months now we have been discussing the events in Ukraine, and for two months now we have been hearing the same question in addition to the stream of hostility, lies, fakes, hatred and insults: How could Russia unprovokedly, as they say, “attack a sovereign, democratic, non-aggressive, independent, peaceful Ukraine?” After all, it posed no threat to Russia itself!

Among those who say this or who think this, I admit, there are sincere people who didn’t understand what was really going on all those years, and there are deceitful people and countries who have long wanted to turn Ukraine into a bridgehead for a battle with Russia, and they have been doing everything for that since Ukraine gained its independence 30 years ago. Politically. Ideologically. And today they continue to do so by pumping weapons into Ukraine.

What has been happening in Ukraine itself all these years would not fit into the format of today’s speech. And it is unlikely that many of you will want to hear or understand it. Just as you didn’t understand it before and didn’t want to understand it. We have spoken repeatedly here in this room about the difficulties of translation. You listen to the Ukrainian authorities in translation, and they have told you and are telling you what you yourself want to hear. And we have listened and listen to the Kiev authorities without translation, and we know and know about their deceitfulness, their lack of agreement, their lies, their deception, including of their own people throughout all these years. Instead of organizing their own state, the regime of oligarchy and total corruption flourished, which made even the Western patrons of Kiev cringe. We know how they tried to create their own ideology based on the denial of everything Russian and everything that has bound us together for centuries. You don’t know and don’t want to know what kind of insults and hatred was used against everything connected with Russia, not only at the household level, but also at the level of state and public figures. You don’t know that during the years of independence a whole generation of people, brought up on hatred of Russia, grew up on the basis of delusional Ukrainian history textbooks. Russophobia has become the main domestic national product of the Ukrainian government and the main export commodity of Ukraine. You will not find anything like this in Russian society with respect to Ukraine and Ukrainians. You just don’t hear their slogans, you don’t notice their torchlight marches, you don’t see their nationalists and outright Nazis. One clever man, the Ukrainian historian Oles Buzina, who was murdered by nationalists in 2015 and who was a patriot of Ukraine (of course, the crime has not yet been investigated, even though the murderers were known) rightly said that as the empire collapsed, extreme farcical nationalism, mixed with deep provincialism, began to flourish in the separated outposts. Ukraine is the clearest example of this.

Today it is not a war in Ukraine, as you say. It is a proxy war between the collective West and Russia. It is as if you have only been waiting for this moment to launch a flywheel of repression against Russia. And if there is any talk of a world war, it is undoubtedly being waged today in the economic sphere. We have no doubt that you have been preparing for it, because the speed at which this flywheel has been launched makes it impossible to doubt that you have been preparing for it well in advance. You are simply simply robbing in the best traditions of the Wild West. In case anyone here is not aware, let me inform you that in addition to countless sanctions and bans, taking private property from Russian citizens who have nothing to do with the SWO, Western countries have frozen $300 billion worth of accounts belonging to Russia. What international law are you talking about then? This is not even a rule-based order you made up. This is not even colonialism, when the enlightened West went to plant civilization in its colonies, robbing their natural resources at the same time. This is nothing less than elementary lawlessness and robbery. So today the masks have simply been thrown off. But now it has become fashionable to blame Russia for the energy and food crisis, which you yourself created.

For eight years we have been telling you about the suffering of people in Donbas. About the shelling by the AFU and nationalist battalions. About the deaths of civilians from this shelling. About the fact that it was not Donbas that went to Kyiv, but Kyiv came to Donbas only because people there did not put up with the coup d’état and the policy of total Ukrainianization by the Maidan authorities. You didn’t respond. You do not want to remember that similar protests in 2014 were brutally suppressed in Kharkiv, Odessa, and Mariupol. We have been telling you all these eight years that this had to stop. There was very little that needed to be done: the Ukrainian authorities had to implement the Minsk agreements, which they had publicly refused to do, using your cover and support, and being under the illusion of complete impunity. They liked to feel part of the so-called civilized world and be your vassals. I wonder if, in light of the current situation, the bankrupt Ukrainian government is biting its elbows about this today. And now, when after all this, after all the crimes of the Kiev regime and warnings, the SSO for the liberation of Donbass began, we suddenly heard desperate cries: why us? (those who know Ukrainian-Russian folklore, will understand what I am talking about).

But I will answer this question myself: it is all thanks to your Western sponsors and patrons, who have been rubbing their hands with joy at the sight of Ukraine turning into an anti-Russia. Everything that is happening now did not start at the end of February. Nor even eight years ago. It began much earlier with the encouragement and support of the United States and its Western satellites.

We have spoken repeatedly about our security concerns. You in the West dismissed these concerns, did not take them seriously, and assured yourselves that NATO was purely defensive in nature, all the while pushing the bloc’s borders right up against our own. And today you’re already talking about the Alliance’s global role, including in Asia. We have put forward our proposals for a global and indivisible security architecture. You have arrogantly dismissed them. And do not need to convince us today that your plans never included the desire to pull Ukraine into NATO. Yes, there was. Not today, but tomorrow. We did not have and do not have any illusions about this.

Once again we want to emphasize: the West does not need Ukraine as such, it was and is needed only as an arena of confrontation with Russia. Ukraine shouldn’t have any illusions either. The West will not help Ukraine. Except by pumping weapons and trying to prolong the conflict. And the West is already at war with Russia by the proxy war method.

Today one cannot fail to be even more surprised by the hypocrisy of our Western partners. The subject of U.S. and Western aggression in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yugoslavia, the inglorious campaign in Afghanistan, not to mention what happened earlier, for example, in Vietnam, has sort of come to naught. These tragedies are not as if remembered today. It is as if they never happened. After all, these events are long gone. And the West has nothing to do with this. After all, there was a struggle for democracy there! True, it cost the lives of millions of people, destroyed cities and countries. And all this from thousands of kilometers away from our own home. On the other hand, today we hear the crazy talk about sponsors of terrorism. I will allow myself to ask a rhetorical question: where did ISIS come from? ISIS emerged as a result of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and its backbone was made up of former members of the Iraqi army. So who is the real sponsor of terrorism?

Today we live in a state of information, or rather, disinformation warfare. Its object is Russia. We have already said more than once what colossal forces of special psychological operations are thrown into the information battlefield. The task is not only to smear the enemy, but to disarm him, depriving him of access to the world public and accusing him of propaganda in passing. The world public needs to hear only one version of events. About “the atrocities of the Russian military, the deliberate shelling of houses and the killing of civilians.” And a completely delusional idea -“about the genocide of the Ukrainian people.” The West has been engaged in a multi-year artillery preparation on the information field. But if before the information war was accompanied by a real war, now it is exactly the opposite.

On the other hand, the world community should hear nothing about Ukrainian provocations, such as those in Bucha or Kramatorsk, about how Ukrainian nationalists cover themselves with civilians by placing firing points near hospitals, schools and kindergartens, near residential buildings and in citizens’ apartments, how they drive them into basements and not let them out, not allowing them to exit through the humanitarian corridors provided daily by the Russian military. And if someone comes out, they are often shot in the back by their own people. There is plenty of evidence of this from the Ukrainians themselves. Only you don’t want to hear it. Have you ever seen the testimonies of Russian prisoners of war and the footage of their torture by Ukrainian nationalists that they post on social media? Have you ever seen something similar from Russian servicemen towards Ukrainian POWs? Have you seen the reports of foreign correspondents who are brought by the Russian military to liberated Ukrainian cities and allowed to look around and talk to anyone? Have you ever heard what the people of these towns are saying, how the Ukrainian nationalists acted and behaved toward them?

I can’t help but notice that the UN Secretary General’s trip to Russia and Ukraine has been presented by both the media and Western politicians in an absolutely perverse way. Thus, the impression is deliberately created that Ukraine and the UN managed to “persuade” Russia to open a humanitarian corridor to evacuate civilians from Azovstal. Meanwhile, the Russian side regularly opens the humanitarian corridors there, and they are still open today, by the way. The problem is that Azovstal militants prefer to use people as “human shields. This is openly stated by those who came out of there. Many of them, contrary to the false claims of the Ukrainian authorities, chose to remain in the DNR or expressed a desire to return to liberated Mariupol. Today, the Azov insurgents finally threw off their masks and demanded a ton of food and medicine for each of the 15 hostages released at Azovstal. Before them, only ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra terrorists did so.

The Permanent Representative of Albania today quoted Trotsky, who said that the army is a cast of society. Is that the episode you were referring to?

Tomorrow we are holding an Arria formula meeting on Ukraine’s violation of international humanitarian law. And we will not be telling you what is going on, but eyewitnesses of those events, Ukrainians and foreign journalists. Come and listen, if you have even the slightest desire to hear objective information.

Thank you.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/05/ ... nd-russia/

Ukraine: Touring an Aidar Dungeon
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MAY 5, 2022
Fergie Chambers

Image
Inside the walls of the small-town sausage plant which became a Neo-nazi prison

The horrors of a meat plant-turned Ukrainian Neo-Nazi base and prison


POLOVYNKYNO, LUGANSK PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC, 4.5.2022-Shortly after the U.S.-backed Maidan coup in the winter of 2014, in conjunction with Crimea’s secession from Ukraine and union with Russia in March of that year, protests began to break out in the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in the east of the country, known together as Donbas. In Donetsk, to the south, the now-notorious Neo-Nazi “Azov” Battalion emerged as the principal combatant force on the Ukrainian side; in the north, along the front lines in Lugansk, known since May of 2014 by anti-Maidan, Russian separatists as the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR), the lesser-known, but possibly more ruthless “Aidar” Battalion was more prevalent. Even Amnesty International, an organization which is reliably in the corner of western informational hegemony, reported back in 2014 on the abuses of Aydar.

Until Russia’s “Special Military Operation,” and official entrance into the Donbas conflict in February of this year, Ukrainian forces occupied most of the territory to the north west of Lugansk city, past the Siversky Donetsk river and the town of Shastiya. Roughly 75 kilometers up the M21 highway from that line, in the outskirts of Starobilsk, is the village of Polovynyko, which locals and officials from the LPR Ministry of Foreign Affairs say soldiers in the Aidar battalion had taken control of by March of 2014.

Image
“Aidar!” seen written in graffiti on the walls of what was the barracks area of the converted plant

Shastiya resident Svetlana Konoploya, among the charter members of the LPR parliament, and now a representative for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told this author that those Aidar forces commandeered what had formerly been a sausage plant and smokehouse in Polovynyko, and converted it into a base, a weapons storage facility, and a military prison. I was with a convoy of journalists from 5 western nations when we met her there, along with other representatives from the ministry, and a former prisoner, on Wednesday.

Just past an LPR military checkpoint, we were led down a dirt road to a grim, walled-in concrete structure, swarming with barbwire, and heavily guarded by LPR soldiers. Ms. Konoploya, who had herself been detained for 85 days at another facility for helping secretly bury two separatist soldiers killed in battle, explained how “anyone who did not support the Maidan coup became enemies of the Ukrainian state,” and that many of those in the area who were vocal in their discontent, including, of course separatist combatants, were taken to this facility, incredibly reminiscent of a concentration camp.

Image
Ivan Maslov, LPR People’s Militia, spent one month in captivity in the Aydar prison camp

One such case was Ivan Maslov, a member of the Lugansk’ People’s Militia and native of Lugansk, the LPR capital, who was arrested in June of 2014 with his commanding officer and one other soldier after a firefight on a bridge. He told us that he beaten all night, and then transported in the trunk of a car to the sausage plant, where he and the other men were thrown into unimaginably small cells, two prisoners sharing dark, damp, cold spaces not much bigger than closets, formerly used as stoves for smoking meat. Ivan stood next to his former cell as he described his month of detention in these conditions, and the almost daily process of interrogation, humiliation, and torture.

“They beat me with their hands feet, and with rubber police batons that are banned in Ukraine. They would put our hands on chopping blocks and slam an axe down next to them. They electrocuted us with telephone wiring, and small generators.”

Image
Ivan and his cellmate shared this space, day and night. They were fed through the grates in the ceiling.

During his month of captivity, Ivan’s commanding officer died in an adjacent cell, where his body lay for three days, before disappearing entirely. Ivan believes that he was poisoned. He said that of the number of captives in the dungeon of six cells, who came in and out, most were in fact civilians, arrested on petty charges, or even less, for simple slander, or for the sake of extortion, “a businessman was in the next cell; his family paid to get him out. Another guy was arrested based on slander, and was kept here for over a month, in his shorts in this cold basement.” Ms. Konoploya stated that arrests were regularly made in order to extract money from prisoner’s family, or more often, for cars, the documents which were then transferred with the aid of government officials in Kiev.

In the room next to the dungeon, Ilya Podkolzin, also from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told us how multiple former prisoners claimed to have been subjected to mock executions, where they were told to stand against a wall, and then had machine guns fired above their heads and at the walls beside them. There were bulletholes all over the walls, and ricochet marks everywhere.“They were told this was a death room, that it would be their final walk,” he said.

Image
Ilya Podkolzin points to a wall where bullets were fired just past prisoners who believed they were being executed

Among the number of harrowing narratives relayed to us, one particularly disturbing was that of a woman named Oksana, who Svetlana Konoploya said had been a close friend. She had been detained in the midst of a major advance into LPR territory, and was held for weeks, raped repeatedly, and left naked in her cell. Ms. Konoplyova told us, “she was beaten to such an extent that they decided she would not survive, so they threw her out into the village. But she survived, because she knew three children waited for her at home, and she spent her remaining months assisting others who were released from captivity.” After all of this, the woman died from respiratory complications, which her family believes came from her detainment in the prison.

Sergei Belov, of Lugansk, a liaison for the LPR government, asserted that multiple war crimes had been committed here and elsewhere in LPR during the conflict, and that regardless of when or how the war ends, the government intends to seek some form of prosecution. He told me that multiple letters were drafted by LPR authorities to the Kiev government, to various western (including American) humanitarian organizations, to the OSCE, to the Red Cross, and to the ICC at the Hague, but that no response was ever received.

Image
This Swastika and SS bolts were among the nazi symbols painted on the walls of the upper floor; it’s notable that the aging, and the removed tiles indicate that this was not done after Ukrainian forces vacated the building

Throughout the building, which was vacated by Aidar when Russian and LPR forces recaptured the nearby region in late February, were remnants of the nationalists who had occupied it as a base. This author saw swastikas were painted on walls, stickers with cartoons calling for the murder of Russians, pamphlets with crosshairs on the face of Russian President Vladimir Putin, along business cards with contacts for Kiev government legal advocates, food, medicine, and religious materials. One booklet, unbelievably, given the larger context, described how to “live the life of a Christian soldier.”

Image
Stickers on the wall read, in Ukrainian, “For Kyiv and Lviv, Kill Russians” and “Donbas will be Ours”

The horrors of the prison operations were the main focus of the visit, but it was clear that many weapons had been stored here. An upstairs loft had visible mounted gun positions, and in the front drive lay the empty case of a Tochka-U rocket, commonly used against the Separatist Republics by Ukrainian forces.

After a week of visiting shelling sites in civilian areas on an almost daily basis, it was difficult to imagine seeing something more disturbing. Wednesday’s visit to the Aidar dungeon proved this assumption wrong, and reinforced the blatant reality of a Ukrainian regime that is overrun with nationalism, barbarism, and criminality, particularly in its armed forces, and most especially aimed at the people of Donbas.

The Aidar battalion was made an official part of the Ukrainian military in 2016, and has participated in a number of Kiev state-sanctioned events, including last year’s independence parade.

You can find video of my visit to the prison here: https://vimeo.com/706403055?embedded=tr ... r=42301792

We toured a former sausage plant, which had been converted from 2014-March 2022 into a prison and weapons storage facility for the Ukrainian neo-Nazi “Aydar” battalion. Footage of the prison, and interview with a former inmate.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/05/ ... r-dungeon/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Fri May 06, 2022 3:23 pm

‘U.S.-NATO proxy war in Ukraine is extension of the war against us’
May 6, 2022 Gloria Verdieu

Image
Gloria Verdieu speaks at inauguration of VII International Seminar for Peace and Abolition of Foreign Military Bases in Guantanamo, Cuba. Photo: Siempre con Cuba

Presentation on behalf of the Socialist Unity Party and Women In Struggle at VII International Seminar for Peace and the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases in Guantanamo, Cuba, May 4.

Since the last international seminar in 2019, Cuba has achieved much – the implementation of a vaccination program that benefited not only the Cuban population, but those most in need of vaccines and health care around the world, by sending doctors and medicine abroad.

In spite of a coup supported by the U.S. in 2009, and the subsequent support of dictators loyal to the U.S. government, the Honduran people were able to overcome the violence and terrorism and courageously build a movement capable of electing a socialist and anti-imperialist woman, Xiomara Castro. After becoming president, Castro immediately canceled the electric bills for 1 million people suffering from poverty created by the corruption of the former president.

Other targets of U.S. imperialism like Bolivia and Venezuela have successfully maintained their sovereignty in spite of the illegal and devastating sanctions by the U.S. and its complicit imperialist allies in Europe, Canada, Australia and Israel.

Now, what have the U.S. rulers done in that time? Well, they continue to flounder in their attempts at containing the coronavirus due to their dependence on the market, rather than a more democratic and centralized approach in line with the international community. They contributed too little too late to combating the unequal access to vaccines suffered by developing countries, especially on the continent of Africa.

The U.S. government is now aggravating the crisis by taking vital resources needed to combat a further spread of the virus for the purpose of sending $33 billion more to fund a proxy war in Ukraine, including arming Nazi military regiments there, and extending NATO’S hunger for oil profits and regime change – targeting Russia and China.

Regime change in Ukraine

Starting in 2004, the U.S. spent over $22.4 billion for regime change in Ukraine. Washington orchestrated and funded a coup in 2014 with billions of dollars in weapons, training and public relations from the National Endowment for Democracy. Much of that funding and training went to self-proclaimed fascist and white supremacist organizations, some of whom carry the symbols of Nazis they admire. They even celebrate the collaboration of those in Ukraine who supported Nazi genocide against Jewish people in World War II.

As Obama sold out the people of Africa with the further implementation of AFRICOM, so has Ukrainian President Zelensky with his collaboration and promotion of Nazism – as when he recently introduced a member of the Azov Battalion to the Greek Parliament, and appointed self-proclaimed Nazis to political office, like the current governor of Odessa.

These are the same forces that have murdered and terrorised the people of Lugansk and Donetsk in the Donbass region for eight years, causing the deaths of 14,000 people. It was the Azov Battalion and similar forces, now an official part of the Ukrainian military, that were primarily responsible for those deaths and the increased genocide. It was only curbed when the Donbass people’s request for assistance to stop the humanitarian crisis was met by Russian military intervention.

We believe that the people of Lugansk and Donetsk, who are rarely mentioned, even by so-called anti-imperialists in the anti-war movement, had every right to ask for assistance to save the lives of their children. And we believe that the greatest threat to humanity today is the continued expansion of NATO, willing to use nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, as the U.S. did when it bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing 80,000 civilians in seconds, then tens of thousands more slowly and painfully.

We believe that Russia has every right to defend itself in not allowing another NATO member state on its borders, especially one with a military led by Nazi regiments that could be put in possession of nuclear arms.

We hear much in the Pentagon’s propaganda machine – the Western corporate media – about the targeting of civilians by Russia. Much of this has been proven false, and even contradicted by Pentagon advisers. The media’s faith in the U.S. State Department information comes in spite of the knowledge that contradictory news is being suppressed in Ukraine. Three television stations were closed for not reporting coverage favorable to the Ukrainian government.

Western media help fascists

Much information came out in Ukraine exposing the Azov Battalion when it took over hospitals, schools and apartment buildings in Mariupol. The U.S. media continued the narrative of attacks on civilian buildings and not Azov outposts. Doctored and mislabeled videos and photos were prevalent during the beginning of the Russian intervention, even showing Israeli bombings and Palestinian resistance as “evidence” of Russian brutality and Ukrainian resistance.

This follows a long history of U.S. corporate media misinformation to push war – from the sinking of the Lusitania to the Gulf of Tonkin incident to “weapons of mass destruction.” The corporate media were also willing accomplices in the destruction of Libya and Syria, using blatant lies and unchecked information from the U.S. State Department.

The bombing by Nazi-led forces of the center of the city of Donetsk, killing over 20 civilians waiting at an ATM machine, was verified by various organizations in Donetsk, media outlets and independent journalists in the Donbass region. But you never saw that report because the TV reporters and news publications in Ukraine that report those types of stories have been closed down. Those who would have protested and reported this missile attack on civilians in Donetsk, like Alexander Matyushenko from the Levitsa association in Dnipropetrovsk (Dnipro), or the 37 journalists detained in early March, have been jailed.

In Kiev, arrests began even earlier. On Feb. 27, brothers Mikhail Kononovich and Aleksandr Kononovich, leaders of the Ukrainian Communist Youth, members of the World Federation of Democratic Youth and ethnic Belarusians, were seized and imprisoned along with members of other organizations.

As I speak, one of our Socialist Unity Party members is traveling in Russia and Donbass, gathering more information on the real situation.

NATO expansion, NATO wars

Since 1990, when the Soviet Union unilaterally disbanded the Warsaw Pact military alliance, NATO has expanded from 17 to 30 member states. In 1999, U.S.-led NATO began raining bombs on the people of Yugoslavia, bombing 10,000 homes and killing thousands of people, including three journalists at the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade.

Despite the end of the alleged threat from the Warsaw Pact, the belligerence continued with the unfathomable killing of 500,000 children in Iraq by the U.S. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of victims of U.S. and NATO wars, including the millions killed in Vietnam, Korea, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and Yemen. Now slavery exists in Libya, because of the war waged by the Obama administration and NATO – a reality that undoubtedly is destroying the lives of children.

In Yemen, U.S. assistance to the war led by Saudi Arabia is causing the starvation of millions of children, according to United Nations estimates. Like Trump and Obama, the Biden administration continues the endless wars abroad and the racist wars by police and ICE against people in the U.S., including immigrants, already victimized by U.S. economic wars against their countries, targeted by drones and Border Patrol on the U.S. borders.

The latest U.S.-NATO proxy war, with the corporate media acting as its propaganda arm, carries the danger of igniting World War III, and will do nothing but exacerbate the domestic and international crises of global warming, critical lack of health care, food insecurity and starvation – crises most affecting children.

Capitalism an open wound

Capitalism in the U.S. is exposed like an open wound. Its proclivity towards war is unacceptable, and today we face an unprecedented challenge to stop a possible world war.

We understand that the crisis of capitalism forces imperialist countries to desperately further siphon the surplus value created by working people and either steal or destroy the productive capacity of lesser capitalist powers like Russia. Russia’s GDP is smaller than that of South Korea, with an almost neocolonial economy dependent on the exchange of raw materials – not the export of capital – to survive.

That’s an important distinction. It explains why Nicaragua, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran, Syria, Zimbabwe and other targets of U.S. imperialism would suffer most if the U.S.-led NATO forces are successful in this war – not to mention the threat of another NATO member state on the border of Russia, this time potentially with nuclear weapons controlled by a Nazi-led military.

Our historic mission right now is to expose how U.S. imperialism’s escalation of its proxy war in Ukraine exacerbates the crisis of workers and oppressed communities at home and worldwide.

We must highlight the fact that the U.S.-NATO proxy war in Ukraine is an extension of the war against us, so that our working class can understand the source and solution to their problem, and begin dismantling the most dangerous threat to humanity today – U.S. imperialism.

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2022/ ... gainst-us/

****************************************

A Statement on Ukraine from the Black Liberation Movement
Black Liberation Movement Organizations 03 May 2022

Image

Black liberation movement organizations issued a joint statement opposing US/NATO actions in Ukraine.

Dismantle NATO Now!
Rescind the $16B US Allocations to the Ukraine War!
US Imperialism is the Main Danger to Peace, Sovereignty, and Justice for Peoples all Over The World!


The ongoing crisis and war in Ukraine threatens to pull the world into a disastrous nuclear confrontation. Disinformation, lies, and propaganda from the US and other western media are aimed at confusing millions of people inside the US and around the world to view Russia as the aggressor, while hiding the US role in the evolution of this conflict. One major example of this manipulation is that western media has not been honest about the massive role that the US played in facilitating a 2014 coup in Ukraine that overthrew the country’s democratically elected president, and funneled support to neo-Nazi forces who were favorable to US/EU interests, helping them rise to power in Ukraine.

We, the undersigned organizations and individuals of the Black Liberation Movement and the various mass organizations and movements fighting for justice inside the US, call on all peace loving, Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities to condemn and oppose US involvement in the Ukraine and across Europe through its various corporate and political interests and its military arm, The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

We, Black people living in the United States, are a people of African descent oppressed inside the United States. We have been barred from the right to housing, to food, to medicine, to clean air, healthy environments, education and livable wages. Our grandmothers make difficult decisions monthly between keeping on the lights or being able to afford insulin. As 13% of the US population, we face disproportionate levels of violent police repression and make up 40% of US prisoners. Those corporate and elite ruling class forces in the US who are making the policies to expand NATO across the 12,500 miles of Russia’s borders from Central Asia to Eastern Europe, including Ukraine, are the same ruling elites that maintain the oppressive policies inside the US that leave our communities in the racist economic and political peril we have suffered here for hundreds of years.

We further condemn the blatant hypocrisy of the US government as a capitalist, imperialist, patriarchal predator power that has invaded and undermined numerous countries for regime change and other schemes, in order to control the politics, wealth, and natural resources of those nations. The United States is the strongest and largest imperialist power in the world and has repeatedly invaded other nations such as Grenada (1983); Afghanistan (2001); Iraq (2003); Libya (2011); and at least 21 others since 1945. The US military arm on the African continent is known as AFRICOM, a force that breeds violence and instability in maintaining US corporate interests across Africa.

In these imperialist wars, it is the Black, Brown, Indigenous, working and poor families who suffer the losses of dislocation, the deaths of loved ones, and other forms of agony. Black people in this country have fought in every US war while our families and communities continue to suffer the ravages of hatred, discrimination, poverty, disease, and death. In the Ukraine conflict, racism is showing its ugly face in the denial of immigration rights to African and other non-white people’s seeking to escape the degradation and violence of this conflict, like all others living in Ukraine.

We join with Black and Brown people in other countries in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, and Latin America who uphold the right of all nations to sovereignty and security, including Russia, who has historically been invaded by the forces of imperialism and fascism across its borders several times in the 20th century. The Russian people lost millions of lives to defeat fascism during WWII, fighting Hitler’s Nazi invasion of the USSR in 1941. This history of invasions of Russia also lies at the root of the Russian concerns about its security and the Ukraine/NATO expansion scheme that has provoked this war.

We call upon every community and organization fighting for justice and peace to adopt and sign this statement calling for the Dismantling of NATO, an end to US Support of the War in Ukraine, and to Rescind the Billions of Dollars in military aid to Ukraine. Those military funds sent to Ukraine should be reallocated to the needs of people inside the US for universal healthcare, universal childcare, affordable housing, education, liquidation of all student loan debt, minimum incomes and other human needs.



Signed by:

NBLM National Unity Initiative
New African People’s Organization
Black Workers for Justice
Mapinduzi
Black Alliance for Peace
All African People’s Revolutionary Party
New African Independence Party
Lowcountry Action Committee
Spirit of Mandela
Cooperation Jackson
Pan-African Community Action
Hood Communist
Imam Jamil Action Network
Parable of the Sower Intentional Community

https://www.blackagendareport.com/state ... n-movement

*********************************

Unity on Ukraine is crumbling in Eastern Europe
Concerns over NATO expansion and oil embargoes are dividing EU countries

Image
Credit: Getty

Croatian President Zoran Milanović’s intervention on the possible accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO was anything but diplomatic.

“I will be chasing the sinful souls of every parliament member who votes in favour like the devil” was his warning to Croatian lawmakers expected to back Sweden and Finland’s anticipated membership application. Milanović said that if called upon as head of state to represent Croatia in NATO discussions, he would veto the two countries’ admission.

Milanović argues that before NATO admits any more members in the name of western solidarity, it should first pressure Bosnia and Herzegovina to change its election law and “give (Bosnian) Croats their fundamental rights.” The Croatian government claims Croats are not properly represented in Bosnia and Herzegovina’s tripartite presidency and condemned elections coming in the country this October as “illegitimate.”

On the substance, questions of Finnish-Swedish NATO membership and elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina — not even a NATO member state — are completely unrelated. Croatia’s Prime Minister lambasted Milanović for a “perfidious” attempt to make one issue conditional on the other. Yet the row is symptomatic of a growing dissonance between supposed international unity in the face of Russian revanchism, and nation-level concerns in eastern Europe.

As the Croatian President vented his frustration, sanctions on Russian oil proposed by the European Commission faced opposition from eastern EU member states which are heavily dependent on Moscow for energy. Hungarian government spokesperson Zoltán Kovács confirmed on Wednesday that Hungary would veto EU sanctions on oil because they are “against Hungarian interests.”

Hungary’s opposition to an oil ban led to howls of rage across the bloc, with Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán widely condemned (not for the first time) as a traitor to the West. Yet the country’s stance is entirely in keeping with the pledge from its nationalist government to shield Hungarian citizens from the negative impacts of war in Ukraine.

Hungarians would certainly feel the effects of a sudden end to Russian oil supplies: according to the International Energy Agency, 58% of Hungarian oil imports came from Russia in 2021. Slovakia, another Eastern European country with severe doubts about the proposed oil ban, received as much as 96% of its oil imports from Russia last year.

Oil refineries are designed to process specific types of oil, so Slovakia and Hungary wouldn’t be able to switch suppliers overnight even if a viable replacement for Russian oil could be found. In the face of such realist objections, the EU offered Hungary and Slovakia the chance to keep buying Russian oil for another year, until the end of 2023.

With Hungary shooting back that the bloc’s proposal still doesn’t protect its energy security, it’s now far from certain that the oil ban will become a reality. And the idea of deferring Hungarian and Slovak adherence to the sanctions presents its own set of difficulties: how would other EU nations dependent on Russian oil, such as the Netherlands, Greece, Poland and Finland, feel about inflicting more hardship on their citizens while the oil continues to flow to Hungary and Slovakia?

Only time will tell, but as the West tries to take new steps in response to Russian aggression, the divide between national and international interests is getting wider.

https://unherd.com/thepost/unity-on-ukr ... rn-europe/

********************************

Hungary: 9 other EU countries have opened accounts in Russian Banks
By Al Mayadeen Net
Source: Agencies
1 May 22:02

Hungary's PM office says apart from their country, nine other European countries have opened accounts in Russian banks to pay for gas.

Image
The head of the Hungarian Prime Minister's office, Gergely Gulyas said on Sunday that apart from Hungary, nine other European countries have opened accounts in Russian banks in accordance with Russia's scheme to accept gas payments in rubles.

Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said on Friday that several European gas suppliers to Russia have agreed to new payment terms in rubles, but are keeping it quiet and disseminating misleading information about Hungary's attitude on the subject.

"Hungary has opened a euro account, to which a gas price is credited in euro, and then a bank converts it into rubles... Beside us, nine other countries are doing the same, but they do not admit they are doing the same, just because in Europe 'being good for Europe' now means that the leadership of the country is not speaking honestly with its people and internationally," Gulyas told Hungarian broadcaster Kossuth Radio.

Russian Gazprom said on Wednesday that four European gas buyers have already paid for gas deliveries from Russia, complying with the Kremlin's resolution to only accept rubles in exchange for Russian gas.

Under the new scheme proposed by Moscow, Gazprombank will open special foreign currency and ruble accounts for foreign customers. Buyers will be able to transfer funds in the currencies specified in their gas contracts. Gazprombank will then sell the funds on the Moscow Exchange and then transfer rubles to the gas buyers' ruble accounts, after which the buyers will then use these funds to pay Gazprom.

https://english.almayadeen.net/news/eco ... -in-russia

***********************************

Abandoned and forgotten
May 6, 3:27 p.m.

Image

Ukrainian commanders were forbidden to take the bodies of the dead from Russians and separatists. The General Staff sent a new order to the troops. According to the document, commanders of all levels are prohibited from organizing the exchange of the dead. It is also forbidden to negotiate with Russians or separatists on this issue. According to our source, the new order was prepared by the Ministry of Defense based on the decision of the Office of the President. The document is classified, but it does not indicate what such a decision is connected with. Commanders who disobey are threatened with dismissal.

Actually, there was no big secret before. Against the background of reports that some exchanges of prisoners are taking place (more than 300 people from each side have already been changed), there is practically no information about the exchanges of the dead. The commanders from the field noted that all proposals of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to take their dead were met with a refusal.

In view of this, our funeral teams are engaged in the burial of the dead UAF soldiers, collecting the dead as the troops advance. Videos on this topic are released regularly.

The reasons for the refusal are quite understandable - if the corpses are taken away, then they must be buried, which means that even more information about the real level of losses will seep into Ukrainian society. And the point here is not even in the payment of compensation (although in them too), but, above all, in concealing the real size of the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which are now hastily trying to compensate at the expense of reservists and the Volkssturm.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/47198 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7599751.html

Pushilin reached the Dnieper
May 6, 4:07 p.m.

Image

Jokes are jokes, and meanwhile Pushilin is already on the banks of the Dnieper.

At one time, Zakharchenko said that the time would come and the DPR would reach Kyiv and the Dnieper. He did not live up to this, but Pushilin turned out to be quite on the banks of the Dnieper, although few believed in this. Together with Pushilin, Turchak arrived in Kherson and declared https://t.me/boris_rozhin/47213 that Kherson is in Russia forever.

In what format, he has not yet specified. In Crimea, they propose to include it in the Crimean Federal District. Nevertheless, the signal from the official was more than significant, although already by the activity of establishing the work of the military-civilian administrations in the liberated territories of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions, it was clear that these territories would not return to Nazi Ukraine.

Image

Also today, the DPR and LPR appointed official plenipotentiary ambassadors in Russia. They were Makeeva and Miroshnik.
For future processes of political integration.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7599974.html

Google Translator

Getting all sorts of mixed signals concerning the disposition of territories taken from the Nazis. The Russian government itself ain't straight on it: in one breath Russia will take no territory, but a month ago indicated that the longer the Ukes perpetuate the suffering the more territory might be taken. A lot of emphasis placed on the south, on cutting Ukraine's Black Sea access which is something that Ukraine historically never had until Soviet times.

Cassad seems to think that territories will be directly absorbed by Russia, which I suspect is unlikely and probably unwise, very damaging to future foreign relations.

That Chilean Gonzolo guy presented a scheme for a 'Federation of Novorussia' which would include about all the territory of that historical designation, each oblast being a republic within that federation. And so: Donesk, Lugansk, Mariopol, Kherson, Kharkov and Odessa all republics. Neutral, I would expect as will be Ukraine. I think that would be optimal, but I'm here and they're there.

**************************************

From Cassad's Telegram Account:

***

forwarded from
Rybar

Image

Attack on Donbass from the south: situation as of 17:00 on May 6, 2022

▪️In Mariupol , allied forces occupied a waste heap on the southeastern outskirts of the Azovstal plant. Attacks on the positions of the Azov national battalion do not stop: after declaring their readiness to exchange civilians for food, the nationalists were equated with terrorists.

▪️Gulyai - Pol and Orekhov are constantly being hit by fire. These are the two main fortified areas of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the national battalions in this direction. After breaking the defenses near Gulyaipole, it is possible to develop an offensive towards the northern group advancing on Slavyansk from the north.

▪️To the west of Orekhovo , the RF Armed Forces occupied the small village of Shcherbaki . Taking control of Orekhov would open the way for an offensive towards Zaporozhye .

▪️At the turn of Novoukrainka - Ugledar - Sweet, the front leveled off.

***

forwarded from
Turan Express
🇺🇦🇩🇪The video with the stories of the evacuees from Azovstal was removed from the Spiegel website due to "inconsistencies".

Another German publication Jungle Welt drew on this. In a three-minute video titled "I Thought I Wouldn't Survive" published by Spiegel, a Mariupol resident described how Azov militants prevented their evacuation and kept them in bunkers.

She said that she decided not to return to Mariupol. "Ukraine is dead to me as a state," she said.

Some time later, Speigel removed the video due to "belatedly identified content inconsistencies".

❗️What a brilliant wording!

Let us now know that to tell the truth means "not to correspond to the content."

Some strange one-sided content. However, what did you expect from the German media?

***

Сolonelcassad
Regarding the statements that about 500 people were evacuated from Mariupol in Zaporozhye.
Some mistakenly confuse this with the evacuation from Azovstal. This is the total number of those who wished to leave Mariupol, plus some of those civilians who left Azovstal. It is only and exclusively about civilians.
It is noteworthy that the vast majority of the inhabitants of Mariupol are not in a hurry to evacuate to Ukraine, waiting for work to restore the normal life of the city, either to the city itself or to temporary accommodation centers on the territory of the DPR.

***

forwarded from
Readovka explains
The invasion of NATO countries into western Ukraine is becoming more and more realistic - it will allow the transfer of additional units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the Donetsk front

Large-scale maneuvers of NATO countries continue in the immediate vicinity of the borders of Ukraine . In parallel with this, the Polish President Andrzej Duda makes a very loud statement: “There will be no border between Poland and Ukraine. This border will not actually exist . In fact, we are talking about the beginning of the legalization of the invasion of Ukraine in the public plane.

As we said earlier, most likely, the introduction of a “peacekeeping” contingent of NATO countries will be carried out under a far-fetched pretext, which will be revealed to the world in the coming weeks. At the same time, Western countries will continue to avoid even minimal fire contact with Russian units. Howeverthis NATO maneuver will allow the transfer of additional units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from western Ukraine to the east , where the Ukrainian army is not doing very well.

***

forwarded from
Vladislav Coal
In the Severodonetsk agglomeration and Seversk:

1) Now clashes continue in the Voevodovka area - the Ukrainians are counter-attacking. Yesterday there was information about her release and the release of the village of Yuzhnoye (part of Rubizhnoye, highlighted by the number 1 in the picture ). It is not known what happened to the bridge over Borovaya (between Voevodovka and Severodonetsk)

2) Since yesterday, the Lugansk governor has been reporting battles in Belogorovka. The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine also speaks of an attack on Seversk. Local residents also report shootings in Serebryanka . Apparently, the crossing of the Donets is being carried out in this area.

3) All this puts the Ukrainian grouping at risk, if not encirclement (the fighting in Popasna is dragging on), then operational coverage. Also, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are required to cover Seversk and its environs.

4) The front here as a whole runs along the river, with the exception of Severodonetsk. It is connected with Lisichansk by three bridges (highlighted in blue) in the villages of Sinetsky, Pavlograd and Sirotino (3 on the map).

If the Ukrainians can still fight for Lisichansk for some time, holding down the Russian forces, then the continuation of the defense in Severodonetsk will only lead to the impossibility of retreat and the massacre at the Azot plant.

Whether the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Severodonetsk will choose the Mariupol scenario or regroup is the main question of the coming days.

***

forwarded from
Rybar

Image

In the western part of Ukraine, as part of the restoration of the combat capabilities of the Air Force , the training of tactical and army aviation pilots continues .

At the same time , joint training flights on Su-25 and L-39 aircraft and Mi-8 and Mi-2 helicopters took place in Vinnitsa , Zhytomyr , Lvov and Ivano-Frankivsk regions today.

The main emphasis is on finding weak spots in air defense systems and ways to bypass them at low altitudes .

The Armed Forces of Ukraine are actively training crews from operating airfields in the western part of the country on Soviet-made flight equipment, probably delivered as military assistance to Ukraine to Eastern European countries.

We have already given a list of airfields suitable for use in the interests of the Ukrainian Air Force. Yesterday , the Kanatovo airfield in the Kirovograd region was put out of action. Another 29 airports and airfields are suitable for use in the interests of the Ukrainian Air Force. #Vinnitsa #Zhytomyr # Ivano -Frankivsk #map #Lviv #Ukraine @rybar * Support us :

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat May 07, 2022 1:35 pm

ibLIVE: Biden Demands that Intelligence Leaks Stop

Image
People being evacuated from Mariupol, May 6, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/ @Newslooks2

Published 6 May 2022

U.S. President Joe Biden, speaking with senior U.S. intelligence and defense officials, said recent media reports about U.S. intelligence exchanges with Ukraine were "counterproductive," NBC television reported, citing administration officials.

On Friday, the evacuation of civilians from Mariupol continued with the support of the United Nations. Negotiations to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine remain stalled. Below are the main developments of this conflict as they happen.

Reuters censors testimony by Mariupol witness - Russia’s deputy ambassador to UNReuters censors testimony by Mariupol witness - Russia’s deputy ambassador to UN

Reuters has heavily censored and distorted testimonies by a woman evacuated from Mariupol in order to adjust her words to its own claims about the city’s shellings by the Russian army, Dmitry Polyansky said at an informal Arria Formula meeting of the UN Security Council, devoted to crimes by the Ukrainian military.

"The Reuters story creates an impression that the woman, Natalya Usmanova, is scared by Russian strikes and apparently hates Russia for what it has done to Ukraine," Polyansky said. He stressed that at the same time Reuters preferred to keep quiet about what the woman said loudly and clearly on Russian television.

Polyansky showed this video of Usmanova saying something Reuters did not dare quote in its story. The woman evacuee literally said:

"I do not wish to return to Ukraine. Honestly. My family’s vote was unanimous. Even if we ever decide to return, we will return only to Mariupol, to the Donetsk People’s Republic. And not to Ukraine," Usmanova said.

Yet, a Reuters spokesperson said the news organization stood by its reporting: "We are still seeking to verify key aspects of Natalia Usmanova's account. We are committed to reporting on the conflict on Ukraine in an impartial and independent way."

"It is deplorable that Western journalists in most cases participate in censorship and conceal undesirable information from their readerships and audiences," Polyansky concluded.

Biden demanded to stop leaks about the exchange of intelligence information with Ukraine

U.S. President Joe Biden, speaking with senior U.S. intelligence and defense officials, said recent media reports about U.S. intelligence exchanges with Ukraine were "counterproductive," NBC television reported, citing administration officials.

According to one official, during a phone call with CIA Director William Burns, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haynes and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Biden said such revelations were "taking away from our goal." Another official said Biden demanded that such leaks, which are of concern to the administration, be stopped.

The network noted that the agencies declined to comment.

As the media noted earlier, the U.S. has set clear limits on the intelligence information that Washington passes to Kiev.

For example, it stressed that the United States had so far refused to provide Ukraine with information about potential targets inside Russia.

US embassy in Moscow warns Americans to avoid public gatherings on May 9

The US embassy to Russia has called on US citizens to avoid public gatherings and festivities marking Victory Day in Moscow, according to the security alert statement published on the embassy’s website on Friday.

The embassy pointed out that in the past years, there had been heightened police presence surrounding such events.

"Given the ongoing tensions, US citizens should avoid large public gatherings," the statement says.

The diplomatic mission advised the US citizens to stay alert, carry IDs and have a personal security plan in case of emergencies.

Ukraine evacuates 500 civilians from Mariupol. Andrily Yermak, the head of the office of President Volodymyr Zelensky, confirmed that 500 civilians were evacuated from Mariupol on Friday. He thanked the United Nations (UN) for its assistance in the evacuation efforts.

U.S. First Lady travels to the Black Sea. On Friday, Jill Biden, the first lady of the United States, traveled to the Romanian military base of Mihail Kogalniceanu, near the Black Sea, to show her support for the U.S. troops deployed in the area.

"On Romanian soil and on the way to dinner with our troops," she tweeted at a base where some 2,000 U.S. soldiers, 500 French troops, and 300 Belgian servicemen are stationed. Later, Biden traveled on Air Force Two to Bucharest, the capital of Romania.

On Saturday, she will meet with representatives of the government of President Klaus Iohannis, U.S. Embassy officials, and educators working with Ukrainian children.

Romania is a member of NATO and part of the European Union. Currently, it hosts 900,000 Ukrainian refugees, making it the country with the most displaced people after Poland.


Russia criticizes the West for prolonging the Ukrainian conflict. While Western countries are calling for an early cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, "they are doing everything to prevent it" with their actions, said Alexei Zaitsev, deputy director of the Press Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said at a briefing on Friday.

Arms deliveries to Ukraine are increasing and the U.S. alone has sent US$3.8 billion worth of military products, he said, adding that Western military supplies will prolong hostilities, cause new destruction of civilian infrastructure, and cost more civilian lives.

Against this backdrop, the Russia-Ukraine peace talks are "in a state of stagnation," Zaitsev said and denied the allegation that Russia could use nuclear weapons, calling such speculation "a deliberate lie." Russia firmly adheres to the principle that "there can be no winners in a nuclear war, and it should not be unleashed," he noted.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/LIV ... -0012.html

Russia: Evidence of Ukrainian Military’s Crimes Provided to UN

Image
Russian Ambassador to the United Nations Security Council Vasily Nebenzya. May. 6, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/@tovahlazaroff

Published 6 May 2022 (12 hours 10 minutes ago)

Ukraine and its Western sponsors reject revealing the reality of the situation, a Russian envoy said.

According to Russia's envoy to the United Nations (UN) Vasily Nebenzya, at an informal meeting of the UN Security Council under the Arria formula, Russian diplomats provided evidence of crimes committed by Ukrainian armed forces and nationalist units in connection with the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

The Russian diplomat referred to the Ukrainian military's violation of international humanitarian law, which has deployed heavy equipment in residential areas and used civilians as human shields.

In this regard, Nebenzya said that Russia has real grounds to claim that the armed forces of Ukraine and its paramilitary units systematically violate the principles of international law. He said there are many eyewitness accounts of the Ukrainian military taking civilians hostage and using them as human shields.

At the meeting, a diagram was presented showing the Ukrainian military positioned in residential buildings in the midst of civilian infrastructure. The diagram showed that tanks are placed on the 1st floor, with civilians staying in the center and snipers, troops with MANPADS and heavy weapons working on the upper floors and roof.


United Nations: Asserting that there will be no winning side in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, India has told the UN Security Council that diplomacy will be an enduring casualty while stressing the immediate need to evacuate innocent civilians from areas witnessing heavy fighting.

Footagee of interviews with civilians who told how they had escaped from the war zone was also presented. They said that the Ukrainian military fired at the vehicles of people trying to evacuate through the humanitarian corridors. The idea that Russian service members were implicated in the Mariupol theater explosion is flatly rejected by one of the residents in the video.

Last February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin launched a special military operation in Ukraine following Kiev's breach of the Minsk agreements and Moscow's eventual recognition of the sovereignty of the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics.

Since then, the West and its European backers have imposed punitive sanctions on Russia, targeting its businesses and the oil and gas industry. Moscow has demanded Ukraine's non-inclusion in the U.S.-led NATO military bloc and has also denounced the continued support for Ukraine by Western countries and their allies, who have been delivering massive arms shipments to help the country wage war against Russia.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0017.html

Russia FM: No Plans to Use Nuclear Weapons in Ukraine

Image
Russia won’t use nuclear weapons against Ukraine, says foreign ministry official Alexei Zaitsev. | Photo: Twitter @newindialife

Published 7 May 2022

Russian FM official Alexei Zaitsev denounced the increase of arms supplies worth billions of dollars to Ukraine by the U.S. and the EU, and argued that this explains the lack of real interest in finding a peaceful way out of the issue.

Deputy head of the Information and Press Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry Alexei Zaitsev said Friday that his nation does not plan to use nuclear weaponry during the special military operation it is carrying out in Ukraine.

In this regard, the official stated that any statements or insinuations about Russia's possible use of nuclear weapons during its operation, "it is a deliberate lie." Zaitsev added that his nation believes that in a nuclear war there can be no winners, so it should never be fought.

"Last year, it was Russia that managed to convince the United States, and then other countries of the nuclear quintet (U.S., China, France, UK, Russia), to reaffirm their commitment to this principle," the official recalled.

The official said that Western powers claim their interest in the end of the conflict as soon as possible, while doing everything possible to strengthen Kiev with weapons and rekindle the flames of hostilities from the media.


"The hypocritical policy of NATO countries and the European Union, declaring that they advocate an end to the conflict as soon as possible, meanwhile doing everything to prevent it, remains a reason for indignation," he added.

Zaitsev denounced the increase of arms supplies worth billions of dollars to Ukraine by the U.S. and the European bloc, and argued that this explains the lack of real interest in finding a peaceful way out of the issue.

Since the beginning of the Russian special operation in defense of the Donbas, last February 24, the Western media has promoted an anti-Russian campaign backed by relevant figures of several nations.

After the beginning of the talks between Kiev and Moscow, several countries expressed their support for a diplomatic solution to the conflict, however, some Western powers continued to send war supplies to Ukraine.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0001.html

*****************************************

Russia destroys railway station in Kharkov, Ukraine

Image
The Russian Aerospace Forces attacked 18 Ukrainian military installations, including two command posts near Kharkov. | Photo: EFE
Published May 7, 2022 (34 minutes ago)

As a result of the attack on the Bogodukhov railway station, about 280 nationalists were killed.

Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said on Saturday that Russian forces destroyed a large group of weapons and military equipment on Friday in the area of ​​the Bogodukhov railway station in Kharkov province, Ukraine.

According to the official, as part of the attack, 280 nationalists were eliminated and 48 teams were neutralized. "A large accumulation of weapons and military equipment received from the United States and European countries was destroyed in the area of ​​the Bogodukhov railway station in the Kharkov region," he said.

Konashenkov noted that Russian aircraft fired air-to-ground missiles at five concentrations of enemy troops and at an ammunition depot in Bakhmut, in the territory claimed by the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic.


Altogether, 18 military objects were destroyed, including two command points, five areas of the concentration of troops and military equipment, along with three fuel stores.

Meanwhile, the Moscow artillerymen attacked 44 Ukrainian command points and 196 defense points.

For its part, the area defense shot down some 13 drones this Friday night and three Tochka-U ballistic missiles were intercepted along with nine projectiles from Smerch multiple rocket launch systems.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-de ... -0006.html

Google Translator

***************************************

Image

Sycophants and Slaves: US Empire is Impervious to any Advice That Might Save it
May 6, 2022
The US Empire pulls out all the stops to forestall its own demise: neo-Nazis, proxy wars, its fearsome agitprop — still, it can’t escape the writing on the wall, according to an American political analyst and writer.

Daniel Patrick Welch made the remarks in an interview with Press TV on Thursday while commenting on a report which said two months after the warning that Beijing appeared poised to help Russia in its fight against Ukraine.

The Reuters report quoted US officials saying they have not detected overt Chinese military and economic support, a welcome development in the tense US-China relationship.

The officials told the news agency in recent days they remain wary about China’s long-standing support for Russia in general, but that the military and economic support that they worried about has not come to pass, at least for now.

“We have not seen the PRC provide direct military support to Russia’s war on Ukraine or engage in systematic efforts to help Russia evade our sanctions,” a Biden administration official told Reuters, referring to the People’s Republic of China.

“We continue to monitor for the PRC and any other country that might provide support to Russia or otherwise evade US and partner sanctions.”

Welch said, “‘US officials’ is the tag used by Reuters and others when their sources are too smart to be held accountable for what they actually say.”

“It’s also a way to sneak things into the news cycle, kind of like a trial balloon, without attaching too much importance to them and see how they work out. This whole thing with ‘expressing relief’ over China’s restraint on Ukraine reeks of this tactic,” he added.

“But even without names it is stunning for what is not said, but left laying out in plain sight. I am always amazed—or enraged and amused—by the assumptions these folks reveal without even meaning to. They are ‘relieved’ that China has ‘heeded their warnings’ not to be too supportive of Russia vis a vis Ukraine. Apparently, up until the very moment Chinese EMP weapons completely disable the Western naval fleet in one fell swoop or are picking US ICBMs out of the sky, the US is free to continue on its globocidal mission as if everyone agrees and loves what they are doing,” he stated.

“It’s a uniquely bizarre and obviously dangerous form of thought. Kind of like an extreme perversion of the fable of the three monkeys. But instead of not seeing, hearing or speaking (evil or otherwise), the warmongers possess none of the senses at all to save the use of the arm holding the stick they use to beat the world into submission,” he noted.

“No, they don’t seem even aware of any input other than that from sycophants and slaves, and there is no little boy on the sidelines to shout that the Emperor has no clothes—or impenetrable missile shield, as it were,” he said.

“Not for lack of trying, of course. The Chinese have been quite reasonably and predictably…well, Chinese, to be perfectly lazy about it. In the run-up to Joltin Joe’s Asia trip, China has been very careful not to flaunt its support for Russia by doing anything more than it has already done. ‘US officials’ stupidly choose to interpret this as acquiescence, or worse, ‘heeding their warnings,’” he said.

It is the US who ignores warnings at their peril, insisted Welch: “Instead, China has been completely clear and explicit about its support for Russia, not only in Ukraine, where they place the blame squarely on NATO, the US and the collective West, but moving forward in the necessary dismantling of the west-led imperial framework. CGTN just published an editorial about the decline of the US and UK; Xi and Putin have jointly spoken out on the subject.”

“A casual observer might have noticed that they were being completely clear because they prefaced their remarks by saying WE ARE BEING COMPLETELY CLEAR,” the analyst said.

Welch went on to point out that the Americans don’t change their behavior despite obvious consequences. “Nope. Not ‘US officials,’ who can’t see their own ridiculous narrative crumbling right before their eyes.”

“They are comfortable with their old ways of thinking that they rule the world and everyone loves them for it. Their language gives them away. Some gasbag from the Rand Corporation recently vented a helium outburst on Fox News: Starting with ‘Pakistan is always a problem,’ it just went downhill from there. In these people’s glaucomic worldview, absolutely no one has the agency, sovereignty or muscle to challenge their rule. Again with the monkeys,” he quipped.

“They’re fine as long as they stay inside their bubble, bullying, bribing and buying they latest symbolic vote at the UN, or convincing economically suicidal Europeans to bathe only from a washtub to ‘stick it to Putin’ while the cost of heating their homes triples,” he said, taking a swipe at conservation ad campaigns now prevalent in Europe.

“But of course, no lie lives forever,” Welch continued. “China is not perfect or clairvoyant. But they are nothing if not patient. The Empire of Lies is well-stocked only in those, of which is has a limitless supply. The world, the worm, and the tide of history all turn (in their turn). The Pope—The Pope, for crying out loud!—recently joined the chorus of those who see NATO as having provoked the Russian intervention, an apparent 180 from just a few weeks ago. Last month he blessed a Ukrainian flag allegedly from Bucha, in a creepy evocation of Blutfahne ritual that would have made even his predecessor Pius XII cringe,” he added, alluding to the tradition of Hitler’s “Blood Flag” from the party’s 1923 Munich ‘Beer Hall Putsch, which became one of the most revered symbols of the NSDAP.

“When they get some details out of that Canadian general they dug out of the ground at Azovstal the picture will come into sharper focus as the pieces come together and the dust settles. This has always been just more of the endless US regime change war, using proxies, including neo-Nazis, bioweapons research, their vaunted propaganda works of course—basically anything they can get their hands on—all to forestall their inevitable demise. China can wait, and we with her. Assuming we survive,” Welch concluded.

https://orinocotribune.com/sycophants-a ... t-save-it/

Image

The Aggressors Accuse Russia of ‘Blackmail’ for Defending its Currency, Energy Wealth, and Even Its Existential Security
May 5, 2022
By Strategic Culture Foundation – Apr 29, 2022

Our enemy is the Western system of U.S.-led imperialism, its capitalist elite, and their political flunkies like Joe Biden and Ursula von der Leyen.

The United States and its NATO and European Union allies have imposed unprecedented economic sanctions on Russia that amount to economic warfare. This warfare has been going on, discernibly, since the CIA-backed coup in Ukraine in 2014 on the back of allegations of Russian wrongdoing, for example, the alleged annexation of Crimea. It’s the logic of a poacher posing as the gamekeeper.

For eight years, the U.S.-led economic war against Russia has been pursued without relent. The self-professed “exceptional nation” presumes the privileged, exclusive use of economic terrorism against others who do not bend the knee. In hock to its Washington master, the European Union has imposed round after round of restrictions on trade with Russia in full compliance with American orders. The European compliance to self-inflict damage is astounding especially given that the U.S. economy is not as reliant on Russia as the EU’s and therefore has not been impacted as badly, at least not directly. But the presumed American “free lunch” is beginning to change, as our columnist Declan Hayes cogently surveyed this week.

Now that the proxy war against Russia has escalated into “Total War” – the historically sinister phrase used by France’s economy minister Bruno Le Maire – the full nefarious scope of the Western objective has become even more explicit. The U.S. and its NATO partners want to achieve the complete collapse of the Russian economy leading to regime change in Moscow. The eruption of violence in Ukraine following Russia’s military intervention on February 24 is but the opportunity to ramp up the U.S.-led war campaign against Russia.

The explicitly stated objective of cutting off Russia’s vital energy trade and the theft of the country’s foreign monetary reserves can only be interpreted as part of a wider imperial plan to crush the Russian nation, subjugate it and conquer its vast natural wealth.

Eight years of NATO-backed military aggression by the Neo-fascist Kiev regime against Russian-speaking populations has gone hand-in-hand with the installation of U.S. strategic weapons across Europe, including Dark Eagle hypersonic missiles in Germany and biological weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine. The military threat to Russia has been in tandem with the relentless economic warfare from sanctions. In addition, there is the intransigence by the U.S. and its NATO partners to engage with Moscow in resolving security concerns through diplomacy. All of this culminated in the present war in Ukraine. The concerted and rapid imposition of further draconian sanctions on the Russian economy from the blockade on virtually its entire banking system as well as the extreme censorship of Russian international media – all of that indicates that the U.S. and its partners were already on a war footing and ready to escalate hostilities.

In this context, ominously, Ukraine is resembling Bosnia-Herzegovina and the pre-World War One assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand as a fatal flashpoint.

The reckless flooding of weapons into Ukraine over recent weeks by the United States, NATO, and the European Union is also proof of a premeditated pent-up war agenda. This week, U.S. President Joe Biden is calling for his Congress to release $33 billion in “emergency aid” for Ukraine to “defend against Russian aggression”. This represents a tenfold increase in the record military support that the Biden administration has already plowed into the Kiev regime. This is tantamount to stoking a powder-keg.

The ludicrous, bitter laugh about this is that when Russia seeks to defend itself and Russian-speaking people, then Moscow is accused of “aggression”.

The latest twist in this Western duplicity and rank hypocrisy comes with the accusations that Russia is using “blackmail” by warning it will cut off its prodigious gas supplies to Europe. Moscow has simply and reasonably demanded that all European importers must henceforth pay for their gas supplies in the Russian currency, the ruble, as opposed to dollars or euros. The move was prompted in part because the Western countries had seized Russia’s foreign reserves and have banned most Russian banks from the international payment system. In other words, it is they who have politicized their currencies as weapons. So what is Russia supposed to do? Give away its vast natural gas wealth for free? To countries that are waging an economic war and increasingly a military proxy war against it?

This week, Russia’s state-owned energy industry Gazprom announced it was suspending the supply of gas to Poland and Bulgaria. The two EU and NATO member states had bluntly refused to pay for their vital energy needs in Russian currency. In that case, Russia has the right to withhold the selling of its commodity.

The move to mandate payment for gas in ruble was an essential counter-measure that has succeeded in defending the Russian currency and economy from collapse. That collapse was being deliberately orchestrated by Western sanctions aimed at strangling Russia. And yet when Russia acts to defend its vital existential interests it is accused of using “blackmail”. One of the shrill voices was that of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. The former German defense minister is a rabid Russophobe. Her logic of accusing Russia of wrongdoing is like a Third Reich minister lambasting the Warsaw Ghetto uprising as an insolent insurrection.

Von der Leyen and her elite, unelected Brussels bureaucracy are calling for all EU members to refuse payments to Russia. They are effectively endorsing the theft of Russia’s wealth. Their arrogance is not surprising. But that arrogance is leading to rebellion across Europe from the economic damage and unbearable cost-of-living crisis hitting the majority of the EU’s 500 million population. Bulgarian and Polish workers are demanding their governments resume trade with Russia to prevent a crash to their livelihoods.

A further mockery in this absurd scenario is that anti-Russia hawks in the United States and Europe have been vociferously jeering for all energy and other trade with Russia to be cancelled. Of course, this mania is all about propping up U.S. capitalism, hegemony over Europe, the weapons industry, and the transatlantic feeding trough for effete European lackeys.

Then, when Russia cuts off the energy supplies because of non-payment, there is an uproar about Moscow “weaponizing trade”.

The Western accusations of economic blackmail are analogous to perverse claims of military blackmail. The criminally reckless aggression that the United States and its NATO partners have pursued against Russia has escalated into war in Ukraine. As a British government minister demonstrated this week, the NATO powers are now directing their proxy Kiev regime to launch attacks on Russian territory. Yet when Russia warns of the dangerous risks of world war veering into a nuclear conflagration, the Western powers and their dutiful media turn around and accuse Russia of using “nuclear blackmail”.

America and Europe’s dubious political “leadership” is exposing itself as delusional, duplicitous, and criminally insane. They are insanely willing to push the world into a catastrophic war. And when Russia stands up to their madness, it is accused of being a reprobate.

In a funny sort of way, such farcical Western leadership is good. For it only further exposes how utterly unhinged and corrupt the Western elite rulers are in the eyes of their increasingly restive, angry populations.

It is Western callous, sociopathic leaders who are the ones blackmailing their own citizens and indeed the rest of the world. Their ultimatum is: destroy Russia or we will destroy everything. This is the mindset of totalitarianism.

The Western public’s enemy is not Russia, and it’s not China nor Iran, Syria, Venezuela, North Korea, Cuba, or some other designated foreign foe. All our enemy is the Western system of U.S.-led imperialism, its capitalist elite, and their political flunkies like Joe Biden and Ursula von der Leyen.

https://orinocotribune.com/the-aggresso ... -security/

*****************************************************

U.S. Pushes Fake Stories To Goad Russia Into Escalation

The geniuses (not) at the National Security Council want to goad Russia into direct attacks on U.S. forces or interests. That would give the U.S. an excuse to further escalate the war in Ukraine into an open confrontation. It would also diverts the attention away from domestic problems.

To achieve this the NSC has pushed a number of stories to the media which claim that alleged Ukrainian successes are based on U.S. intelligence.

U.S. Intelligence Is Helping Ukraine Kill Russian Generals, Officials Say, May 4, NYT

WASHINGTON — The United States has provided intelligence about Russian units that has allowed Ukrainians to target and kill many of the Russian generals who have died in action in the Ukraine war, according to senior American officials.
Ukrainian officials said they have killed approximately 12 generals on the front lines, a number that has astonished military analysts.

The targeting help is part of a classified effort by the Biden administration to provide real-time battlefield intelligence to Ukraine. That intelligence also includes anticipated Russian troop movements gleaned from recent American assessments of Moscow’s secret battle plan for the fighting in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine, the officials said. Officials declined to specify how many generals had been killed as a result of U.S. assistance.

The United States has focused on providing the location and other details about the Russian military’s mobile headquarters, which relocate frequently. Ukrainian officials have combined that geographic information with their own intelligence — including intercepted communications that alert the Ukrainian military to the presence of senior Russian officers — to conduct artillery strikes and other attacks that have killed Russian officers.


The story is obvious bullshit because there are only two Russian generals who have died so far during the Russian campaign in Ukraine.

Major General Andrey Sukhovetsky was killed on February 28 and Major General Vladimir Frolov was killed in early April. Both deaths were immediately officially acknowledged and reported in Russian media. Both men were buried with military honors.

All other 'killed Russian generals' are victims of the 'ghost of Kiev'. The Ukrainian propaganda apparatus likes such stories because it knows that 'western' media will pick up on them.

Russia does not hide the death of high officers. It is impossible to do so over longer periods as such men are known by many others. It would be bad for any government to get caught in such a scheme. There is also no reason to do so.

Some U.S. sources claim that a general's death will demoralize the troops he led. The opposite is the case. Generals getting killed on or near the frontline demonstrate to frontline soldiers that they are not alone in their fighting and that their officers are doing the job while carrying the same high risk than they do.

The Pentagon denied any involvement:

The Pentagon denied Thursday that the U.S. has shared intelligence with Ukraine with the intent of targeting and killing senior Russian military leaders, stressing that the goal of U.S. intelligence is simply to allow Ukrainian forces to defend themselves against Russia's invasion.
The generals in the Pentagon are keen to not become targets for Russian reprisals.


Here is another such story:

U.S. intel helped Ukraine sink Russian flagship Moskva, officials say, May 5, NBCnews

Intelligence shared by the U.S. helped Ukraine sink the Russian cruiser Moskva, U.S. officials told NBC News, confirming an American role in perhaps the most embarrassing blow to Vladimir Putin’s troubled invasion of Ukraine.
A guided missile cruiser carrying a crew of 510, the Moskva was the flagship of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. It sank on April 14 after being struck by two Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missiles.


It is in fact still not clear what has happened to the Moskva. Russia only said that the ship had an explosion on board that ripped the hull below the waterline and caused a fire. There are other possibilities but hits by two Ukrainian anti-ship missiles seem unlikely.

The Pentagon again denied any direct involvement:

In a statement released after this story was published, Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said the U.S. did not provide Ukraine with "specific targeting information for the Moskva."
"We were not involved in the Ukrainians’ decision to strike the ship or in the operation they carried out," Kirby added. "We had no prior knowledge of Ukraine’s intent to target the ship. The Ukrainians have their own intelligence capabilities to track and target Russian naval vessels, as they did in this case."


The last sentence is incorrect as Russia destroyed all Ukrainian naval radars that were stupid enough to radiate.

Russia will not react to such stupid stories. It knows that the U.S. is pushing all kinds of battlefield information as well as weapons to the Ukrainians. It is also assumed that foreign generals are 'consulting' the general staff of the Ukrainian forces. Neither will help the Ukraine to win the war.

Over the longer term Russia may well seek revenge for the U.S. proxy war against it. But President Putin is a patient man and revenge is a dish best served cold.

Posted by b on May 6, 2022 at 15:29 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/05/u ... .html#more

'b' has misplaced faith in Putin, the guy is able, more so than the dickweeds we are presented as 'our' choices but he is still a capitalist tool and a traitor to the USSR.

I do agree concerning the nature of the damage to the Moskva.

As far as the 'intelligence' help, it must be assumed that is going on, US provides such to other vassals. But some of that is just propaganda drama.

**********************************************************

We feel like a single entity with Russia
May 7, 10:37

Image

The deputy chairman of the military-civilian administration of the Kherson region said that the Kherson region would strive to become part of Russia.

We feel like a single entity with Russia

The fact that the region will strive to become one of the subjects of the Russian Federation RIA Novosti said the Deputy Chairman of the military-civilian administration of the Kherson region Kirill Stremousov.

- We intend to live as part of the Russian Federation and will resemble something close to Crimea in terms of the pace of development. The region will strive to become a subject of the Russian Federation. No one will force anything, but the original Russian lands must return to their historical channel of culture and values, - Stremousova quotes the publication.

He stated that the Kherson region is ready to turn to Russia with a request to include the region in its composition.

— If necessary, we are ready to apply, but already now we are fully cooperating and feel like one single whole with the regions of Russia

https://orenburg.media/?p=133113 - cink

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7600805.html

The new coat of arms of the Kherson region
May 7, 2:05 p.m.

Image

For lovers of historical eclecticism.
The military-civil administration of the Kherson region proposes the coat of arms of the times of the Russian Empire as a new coat of arms of the region.
All this is happening along with the restoration of monuments to Lenin.
All this, of course, comes about due to the lack of a coherent ideology, so sometimes one can observe an amusing coexistence of pieces of fundamentally different projects that replace the official ideological void. From here Lenin is in an embrace with the Russian Empire.
Postmodern? Postmodern.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7600620.html

Having been 'on top' of this situation for the last eight years I am certain that many inhabitants of the once and perhaps future 'Novorossia' feel very much this way. Though perhaps not as many as would have in 2014-2015 due to the current destruction(which would have been minimal then) and eight years of Nazi propaganda. Look what Hitler was able to do with six years in power...

The feasibility of that option is questionable despite what the people might want, consideration of China must be taken. Must remember that the Chinese are great sticklers for the letter of international law, for example they have not recognized the annexation of Crimea despite the overwhelming plebiscite. And make no mistake, China is the indispensable ally, they will have a say.

**************************************************************

Biden Sends Ukraine Billions of Dollars of Weaponry it Can’t Use Properly
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MAY 6, 2022
Scott Ritter

Image

Kiev can’t maintain and repair complex US and NATO arms – if they break, they’re useless

After hounding the US and other NATO members for weeks about his need for heavy weapons to defend against Russia’s ongoing “special military operation”, Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky, appears to have been granted his wish. The US Congress, on April 28, passed legislation that breathed life into a World War II-era law that would allow the US to quickly supply weapons to Ukraine on loan.

By a vote of 417 to 10, the House of Representatives sent the revised 80-year-old law to the desk of President Joe Biden, where he is expected to sign it (the US Senate had earlier passed the legislation unanimously.)

“Passage of that act enabled Great Britain and Winston Churchill to keep fighting and to survive the fascist Nazi bombardment until the United States could enter the war,” said Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland who has been at the forefront of anti-Russian legislation over the years. “President Zelensky has said that Ukraine needs weapons to sustain themselves, and President Biden has answered that call.”

The Congressional action comes on the heels of President Biden approving an additional $33 billion in military aid on top of the nearly $3 billion already provided to Ukraine since the start of the conflict with Russia. While much of the earlier weapons shipments focused on light weaponry such as anti-tank missiles and man-portable air defense systems, the new support package places an emphasis on heavy weaponry, such as howitzers and armored fighting vehicles, which Ukraine needs to replace equipment destroyed or damaged in battle.

Beware of what you wish for.

General Omar Bradley, a famous American military commander during World War II who knew more than a thing or two about killing Nazis, is attributed with saying “amateurs talk strategy, professionals talk logistics.” For every piece of heavy equipment that the Ukrainian military is about to receive as part of this massive infusion of military aid provided by the US there is attached the unspoken yet critical reality of the issue of maintenance and sustainability. Simply put, if its broke, you can’t use it. And military equipment breaks – frequently – especially when subjected to the strains and stress of unending modern combat.

Take the M777 155mm towed howitzer the US is providing to Ukraine – some 90 in total. Intended to be a lightweight, easily transportable replacement for the workhorse M198 howitzer used by the US Army and Marines from the mid-1980’s through the mid-2000’s, its design made sacrifices to reduce weight which, under combat conditions, resulted in “serious problems with metal fatigue, instability while firing, and damage inflicted by recoil quickly became apparent,” according to a fact-sheet about the system. Many of the problems faced by the M777 revolve around the materials used in its production. “There are many problems with using titanium instead of steel,” the fact-sheet notes, “rooted in the fact that while it is similarly strong, titanium alloys are much less flexible (making them more prone to metal fatigue).” Moreover, the fact sheet concludes that “this artillery piece is too light for the powerful 155 mm ammunition. The lighter a weapon is that fires a given projectile and propellant charge, the more violent its recoil is. This has resulted in the recoil-absorption mechanisms in the M777 wearing out dangerously fast in combat conditions.”

The US Army experience at the National Training Center, in Fort Irwin, California, shows that the combat effectiveness of an M777-equipped artillery unit begins to degrade around the fourth day of operations, primarily due to maintenance issues. Left unresolved, an M777-equipped unit could find itself completely combat ineffective within a week. The US Army solution—extensive field-level maintenance supported by forward-deployment of critical spare parts and highly trained personnel—is one that can only be conducted by units trained to do so, and with the logistical infrastructure in place to allow it.

The Ukrainian Army, which is undergoing training on the M777 system at the US Army training center in Grafenwoehr, Germany, will be focused on the manpower-heavy requirements of M777 operation (which needs an eight-man crew, as opposed to the five-man crew of the M198), and not how to maintain the system in combat. But even if these weapons make it to the front lines, the complexity of the system will ensure inefficient operations which sooner rather than later will result in the M777 howitzer breaking down with no means of repairing it.

The logistical problems of the M777 are replicated with each item of heavy military equipment the US and its NATO allies are providing to Ukraine, from 200 obsolete Vietnam-era M113 armored personnel carriers (whose 6V53 Detroit two-stroke six-cylinder diesel engines with Allison TX100-1 three-speed automatic transmissions are unlike anything in the Ukrainian military arsenal, meaning there is no one qualified to maintain or repair them in Ukraine) to the 50 obsolete 1960’s-era Gepard anti-aircraft armored vehicles dispatched by Germany (with separate engines for propulsion and energy supply to the turret, doubling the maintenance headache). The US and NATO seem content with providing Ukraine with old, worn out (obsolete is the operative word here) equipment that is virtually guaranteed to break down rapidly under combat conditions and for which Ukraine has no logistical support plan in place.

Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic Speaker of the House, recently visited Ukraine, where she told President Zelensky “America stands with Ukraine. We stand with Ukraine until victory is won,” adding “Our commitment is to be there for you until the fight is done.” Pelosi’s visit has been portrayed as an indication that the Biden administration, by providing Ukraine with the heavy weaponry it has been requesting, is committed to Ukraine prevailing in the ongoing conflict with Russia. But the reality is far different—by providing Ukraine with equipment which is all but guaranteed to break down shortly after entering combat, and for which Ukraine has no infrastructure on hand to maintain and repair, Biden and Pelosi are doing little more than feeding the Ukrainian military suicide pills and calling it nutrition.

With friends like these, who needs enemies.



https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/05/ ... -properly/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat May 07, 2022 3:35 pm

Russia’s Statements at the “Arria-Formula” Meeting on IHL Violations and Crimes Committed by Ukrainian Military and Militia
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MAY 6, 2022

Image

Remarks by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia and First Deputy Permanent Representative Dmitry Polyanskiy at “Arria-formula” meeting of UNSC members on IHL violations and other crimes committed by Ukrainian military and militia

Opening remarks:

Vassily Nebenzia: Dear colleagues,

We welcome you to our Arria-formula meeting focusing on the crimes of Ukrainian army and militia committed in the context of Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine. Today we will try to speak as little as possible by ourselves and to share with you accounts of the residents of Eastern and Southern Ukraine and to give the floor to foreign journalists who have been working in these areas.

If you read the Western mainstream media and listen to the Western and Ukrainian politicians you will have in your mind more or less the following picture of what is happening in Ukraine. «Russia, jealous of its neighbor’s success and prospects to become a member of the EU and a part of a free, civilized world, launched a full-scale invasion against this country. Russian forces committed and continue to commit atrocities and brave Ukrainian army and defenders try to shelter them from terrible Russian indiscriminate shellings».

The reality, however, is strikingly different and Ukrainian authorities and their Western backers are not interested in shedding any light on it. I will not raise here the issue of blatant and heinous provocations of Ukraine and its sponsors like Bucha, Kramatorsk and Irpin. This setup is so obvious that the UK Presidency of the Security Council even decided in total breach of the Council’s rules of procedure to deny us our right to call for an urgent meeting on Bucha provocation.

I will just try to debunk some of the myths promoted by Ukraine by passing the microphone to fellow residents of Ukraine who faced gruesome reality on the ground.

As you all know, even military activities have their laws. They are called International Humanitarian Law, which roughly boils down, inter alia, to the following principles: no usage of civilian infrastructure for military purposes; no placement of heavy weaponry in residential areas, no use of civilian population as «human shield» and dignified treatment of the prisoners of war. We have reasons to believe that all those principles are systematically violated by the Ukrainian army and militia.

There are many witnesses claiming that Ukrainian army is using civilians as hostages and «human shield». This is how, for example, the Azov battalion defense tactics in big cities, namely Mariupol, look like.

Watch VIDEO 1 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/YYAQHHUSe7E7Dg

You may see on the screen how they normally place themselves on the first and upper floors of the residential buildings while civilian population is kept hostage right in the middle of the house. Tanks are placed under the arches, if there are any. The whole building turns into artillery position.

There are a lot of accounts of Ukrainian military placing tanks, artillery and rocket launching systems in residential areas, often despite clear protest of those who live in these neighborhoods, thus turning these buildings in a kind of a sandwich. And that’s how residents of Ukrainian cities describe it. We would like to draw your attention to the words about the theater in Mariupol, which was allegedly destroyed by the Russian armed forces.

Watch VIDEO 2 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/viLLjpRwS1bAOA

We have a lot of accounts of people prohibited to exit besieged cities through humanitarian corridors opened by Russia and even not knowing about the existence of such corridors. I apologize in advance to the Russian-speaking audience. The next video contains some obscenities, but we found it necessary to keep the speech as it is.

Watch VIDEO 3 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/p9r6TLRcn171bg

A lot of these crimes are attributed to the so-called units of territorial defense which were recklessly armed by Ukrainian authorities despite the fact that there are a lot of convicted criminals and inmates let out of prisons in their ranks. That resulted in anarchy and wide-spread lootings in a number of cities. There are a lot of witnesses of deliberate attacks on residential blocks, houses and civilian infrastructure by Azov and Ukrainian army detachments to present this as a result of Russian military operation, to compromise our claims that we use only high-precision weapons and do not target civilian infrastructure.

Watch VIDEO 4 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/IYeiqguAUthMkQ

The situation around evacuation of civilians from Mariupol is extensively covered in the news right now, the relevant information is heavily distorted by the Ukrainian and Western media. Let’s listen to some of the witnesses. My colleague, First Deputy Permanent Representative Dmitry Polyanskiy will take the floor now to introduce you to one interesting interview.

Watch VIDEO 5 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/cqZCbXe_IahmAg

Dmitry Polyanskiy: Credit for this moving footage goes to Patrick Lancaster, who planned to be with us today, but he couldn’t. It’s his coverage of what is happening now in Mariupol.

I want to make a reference to have Western mainstream media cover the topic of people evacuated from Mariupol. It’s puzzling, because they have same materials as their Russian colleagues, same settings, and same witnesses. It is extremely disappointing that Western journalists in most cases clearly engage in censorship, concealing awkward information from Western public. That’s the way a new iron curtain is being created. I will give you only one very recent example.

On 2 May a group of journalists from many countries interviewd a group of evacuees from Azovstal steel works. One of them, Natalia Usmanova, was very vocal and emotional. That’s why she appeared in many footages. She spoke with REUTERS, and this agency published a short report with a video reel at its website.

Read article at reuters.com https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ma ... 022-05-01/

What’s the impression that you get from this coverage? Natalia is terrified, frightened by Russian strikes, she must be hating Russia for what it did to Ukraine. Thank God she is safe and can go to Ukraine – that’s the impression that you get when watching this video reel and reading the coverage on Reuters website.

But in fact REUTERS censored heavily what she really said. Let’s watch the remaining part of Natalia’s account which was shown in full on Russian TV.

Watch VIDEO 6 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/F8wB2IZrXW_UuQ

It is clear from this video what the real mood of Natalia Usmanova was. It is really hard to comment on this shameless manipulation. How will Western viewers learn the truth when Russian TV channels, as we all know, are being banned from Western countries. Who is spreading propaganda here? Make a judgement yourself. And my personal remark: shame on you, REUTERS. Instead of promoting journalism, freedom of speech and access to information, you choose the path of becoming soldiers of an information war against Russia. Bu the way, German SPEIGEL published a more extended version of the interview with Natalia Usmanova and deleted it after several hours. We do not have any doubt why.

Vassily Nebenzia: Having watched all these video reels, one might ask a question: why would Ukrainian fighters treat their fellow citizens in such a condescending, denigrating, inhumane way? Why would they destroy Ukrainian cities and not care about the fate of the civilians? The answer is very simple yet difficult to digest: Azov battalions and other nationalists simply do not treat Russian-speaking population as their equals, as fellow-citizens of their country.

Another important issue that we can’t avoid touching is the animal cruelty of the Ukrainian militia towards the Russian military detainees. We intentionally will not demonstrate today the relevant videos, but there are plenty of them on social media. Russian soldiers, with arms tightened behind their backs are shot in their legs, their throats are being cut, they are beaten drastically and their bones are being broken sadistically. And all these tortures are filmed by “proud” Ukrainian militia. To prevent you from going into another round of needless accusations of the Russian propaganda we are simply inviting you to watch the following.

Watch VIDEO 7 https://disk.yandex.ru/i/d5aNEj6KEXmTlQ

Colleagues, we tried to show to you only some of the accounts of the victims of the crimes and denigrating treatment by Ukrainian army and nationalists. We have many more, this is only a small fraction. We document them to ensure accountability for those who commited these crimes. But because of time limits we will stop at this point and give the floor to our distinguished briefers. They come from different countries but have one thing in common. They all have first-hand experience of working in areas of our special military operation. Many of them were also covering the 8 years long war waged by Ukraine against residents of Donetsk and Lugansk.

Our first briefer hardly needs any introduction. We have the pleasure to welcome Anne-Laure Bonnel, French journalist, who has already done invaluable work to shed light on the life of civilian population of Donbas, who has been simply “canceled” in the humane West.

Our second briefer is Giorgio Bianchi, Italian photojournalist, director, filmmaker and writer. He covered widely the armed conflict in Syria and the Ukrainian crisis starting from “EuroMaidan”. In his work Giorgio always pays particular attention to humanitarian and anthropological issues. He also made an interview with young lady Marianna, whose photos spread with rocket speed throughout Western media as a victims of Russia’s alleged artillery attack on a maternity hospital in Mariupol. How many times have we heard this blatant lies at the Security Council from our Western colleagues?

We are glad to greet today Salem Abdel-Munem, mainly known as Salam Al-Obaidy. He is the head of Moscow and North European bureau of the Independent Pan-Arabic telecommunications network “Al-Mayadeen”. He began his journalistic career back in the late eighties of 20th century, working as a translator in a number of Soviet foreign broadcasting publications. Later, he worked as a correspondent for a number of Arab media in Moscow. He is a universal journalist, and has covered various spheres of life in Russia, the CIS, the Baltic and Northern European states. He has extensive experience working in hot spots such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and so on.

Welcome to Sonja van den Ende from the Netherlands, whose testimonies about the tragedies in Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics are also priceless.

And our last but not least guest today is Asya Zuan, editor-in-chief of the Bulgarian edition of “News Front” Agency who is also very much familiar with the Ukrainian context, in particular Donbas.

We have no doubts that our briefers will help to dilute the one-sided media approach to the happenings in the Eastern parts of Ukraine and will allow to see and hear further testimonies of grave violations of IHL and war crimes by the Ukrainian armed forces and nationalistic battalions.

Closing remarks:

Vassily Nebenzia: I think we are coming to the end of our meeting. I once again thank the briefers, and not only them, but also those whom the interviewed. Those people do not sit at this table. They often find themselves in terrible conditions. But they gave an account of why those conditions became possible. Unlike what we hear in mainstream media today, they clearly say who is to blame for what has happened to them and what is happening to them.

Colleagues,

We hope that this meeting was useful – to present not even alternative, but true accounts of those witnesses, whatever their opinion was. But if your eyes and ears are closed to the truth, and you just read out your national statements from your papers, we cannot do anything with it but try to come again with those true accounts of people who testified. Maybe, some of you are okay being comfortably numb, but it will not change the truth. And you heard that truth today from residents of Eastern and Southern Ukraine and journalists who work there. So open your eyes and embrace the truth, no matter how cruel or uncomfortable it is.

Thank you.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/05/ ... d-militia/

NATO Summit in Spain and the Russian Iskander Missile System
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MAY 6, 2022
Yoselina Guevara

Image

There is no doubt that dates count in the Russia-Ukraine crisis, because of their symbolic and historical value or because of the time pressure as in any war conflict. While we are anxiously awaiting what will happen on May 9, Victory Day for the Russian Federation, another of the most eagerly awaited dates is June 28-30, when the NATO Summit will be held in Spain.

The importance of this Atlantic Alliance meeting in Madrid lies in the fact that it could mean the acceptance by the thirty member countries of the possible membership application of Sweden and Finland. Unless one member state vetoes it, as Croatia’s pro-Russian President Zoran Milanović wishes. But to reach the end of June with the membership application, these countries will have to vote and decide on their request to join NATO in the coming days in their respective parliaments in Stockholm and Helsinki.

Showing its teeth

In this regard Russia is using the age-old tactic of deterrence through the display of its military might, a customary practice of nuclear powers. However, those who confront the Federation know that their pulse will not tremble and that they will indeed be able to use even the most devastating weapons.

Recently the Russian Defense Ministry announced that it is conducting military exercises simulating nuclear missile strikes in Kaliningrad province, practicing “electronic launches” of nuclear-capable mobile ballistic missiles, Iskander-M, near the Lithuanian and Polish borders. This type of exercises is not new in Kaliningrad, in fact they had already conducted them in 2016. In this case the description is quite explicit, approximately about 100 soldiers participated in multiple strike exercises against logistic and command targets, and also simulated operations in environmental conditions of radiation and chemical contamination.

Fearsome Iskander missile system

The Iskander missile system, the Persian name for Alexander the Great, is a short-range ballistic missile system of about 500 km by world standards; it can deliver Iskander-M (9M729), Iskander-K, and even 9M729 cruise missiles. Beyond the complicated transport that includes support vehicles and complex electronic launching systems, what is of interest is the danger of these missiles, especially the nuclear destructive capacity they can carry. Nuclear weapons specialists point out that the Iskander M 9K720 missile and the Iskander 9M729 cruise missile for 2005 and 2017 could carry a nuclear warhead with a capacity of 10 to 100 kilotons. In other words, these weapons would be equal to or above the destructive level of the Hiroshima bomb (15 kiloton capacity) that almost immediately killed some 146 thousand people in Japan, leaving radioactive after-effects that the population is still suffering from today.

On the other hand, the range of the Iskander tactical missiles deployed in Kaliningrad targets the main capitals of the Baltic countries: Berlin, Copenhagen, Stockholm and Helsinki. In addition, of course, to NATO’s Aegis Ashore missile base in Redzikowo, Poland, which will only be active by the end of 2022. In effect this gives the Russian Federation a fairly wide range of devastating retaliatory options.

Nuclear message

Russia’s clear intention is to warn Scandinavian lawmakers, which as non-aligned countries, Sweden and Finland, have never been part of the nuclear deterrence scheme (formerly Soviet, now Russian) but as nations openly aligned against Moscow (being part of NATO) that doctrinal restraint would automatically be lost.

Especially if, in military terms, the logistical land blockade implemented by Poland and Lithuania (NATO members) against Kaliningrad were to be joined by a naval blockade operated by the navies of Sweden and Finland with the aim of disrupting Russian supplies from St. Petersburg to the strategic enclave. For the time being, the Finnish consortium Fennovoima has cancelled its contract with the Russian group Rosatom for the construction of the third nuclear power plant in Finland, citing risks related to the conflict in Ukraine. The triggering of a third world war, or a warlike confrontation of major dimensions, may be decided in the near future, perhaps only in weeks or days.

References

“Tactical nuclear weapons: history, state of the art, armaments, and strategies of the major nuclear states”. By Dmitri Sergeyevich Amirov Belova. Journal of the Spanish Institute of Strategic Studies. Year 2021.

“Non-proliferation and nuclear arms control at the crossroads”. Cuadernos de Estrategia 205. Spanish Institute of Strategic Studies. Year 2020.

“The russian operational- tactical iskander missile system”. Stefan Forss. Strategian laitos. Year 2012.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/05/ ... le-system/

*************************************************

Instead of fighting COVID, U.S. spent money to support neo-Nazis in Ukraine
May 6, 2022 Lugansk Information Center

Image
John Parker (center) receives award from Chairman of the Government of the Lugansk People’s Republic Sergey Kozlov (right), May 5. Photo: Lugansk Information Center

Lugansk, May 5 – The United States spent the money allocated to fight COVID-19 to support neo-nazis in Ukraine, said John Parker, coordinator of the Harriet Tubman Center for Social Justice and one of the leaders of the U.S. Socialist Unity Party, during a meeting with the Chairman of the Government of the Lugansk People’s Republic Sergey Kozlov.

“Now we can clearly see what the U.S. government is doing in Ukraine and Donbass. The money that was intended to fight the pandemic, which is about $16 billion, they spent on supporting neo-nazis who are killing children,” he said.

The political leader noted that many Americans do not know that the United States is promoting the ideas of fascism in Ukraine.

Earlier, the Chairman of the Government of the LPR presented Parker with an honorary badge “For Good Deeds.”

Source: Lugansk Information Center

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2022/ ... n-ukraine/

************************

Showdown at “Credibility Gulch” in Ukraine War
By Dee Knight - May 6, 2022 6

img]https://i0.wp.com/covertactionmagazine. ... =600&ssl=1[/img]
[Source: thehill.com; Collage Courtesy of Steve Brown]

Back in the 1960s and 1970s during the war in Vietnam, everybody knew about the “credibility gap,” which morphed into Credibility Gulch as the official story stretched ever-farther from reality.

We are seeing it again in the current war between the United States/NATO and Russia, being fought out mainly in Ukraine. It is becoming “the Mother of All Energy Wars,” according to Charlotte Dennett, who highlights U.S. determination to cut Western Europe off from Russian gas and oil. She also links it to the recent endless wars to control the world’s energy supply in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya and Iran, and to dominate the Eurasian landmass with its enormous deposits of fossil fuels and other rich resources.

So when Joe Biden says he is doing “everything within my power” to address “Putin price hikes,” he is stretching truth to the breaking point. He is really saying we need to endure higher prices for gas—and food, rent, clothes, and everything else—because of the reckless draconian sanction war on Russia. It is an economic war of attrition against Russia, but it is hitting the whole world. So far Western Europe is suffering more than Russia, and the poorest people in the world, especially in Africa and the Middle East, are likely to be hurt the most. This hurt will turn into a massive showdown with reality.

About the war itself, there is just one acceptable narrative in the mainstream media: that it is an unprovoked and illegal aggression by Russia. Any alternative views are “far-fetched claims from Russia” to “discredit international concerns about… war crimes,” in the words from the April 12 New York Times. In the online version of that article Ben Norton, editor of Multipolarista.com, is shown with a red line across his face, tweeting on Chinese media. It says Norton “claimed that a coup sponsored by the United States government took place in Ukraine in 2014 and that U.S. officials had installed the leaders of the current Ukrainian government.”

Image
[Source: multipolarista.com]

How far-fetched is this claim?

According to Scott Ritter, the former Marine intelligence officer who served as a UN inspector of “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq, it is exactly what happened. He takes it further back: During World War II, he says, “many Ukrainians joined the Waffen SS and fought for the Germans. They murdered, committed atrocities against Poles, Russians and Jews. In Babi Yar more than 30,000 Jews were gunned down.”

Image
Scott Ritter, former Marine intelligence officer who served as a UN inspector of “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq. [Source: wikipedia.org]

In an interview with Joe Lombardo of the United National Antiwar Coalition and Margaret Flowers of PopularResistance.org, Ritter tells of the Ukrainian fascist movement led by Stepan Bandera, who today has become an official hero to the far-right Ukrainian government. After 1944, Ritter notes, Bandera began a resistance against the Soviets, which killed over 300,000 Russians.”

Ritter further points out that the CIA continued to fund, support and nurture the Bandera movement as part of its anti-Soviet activity right up to 1990. All this is well-documented: “CIA intervention in Ukraine has been taking place for decades,” as detailed by Richard Breitman and Norman Goda in Hitler’s Shadow: Nazi War Criminals, U.S. Intelligence, and the Cold War, published by the U.S. National Archives.

Image
Ukrainian nationalists display Stepan Bandera poster. [Source: rferl.org]

In “Seven Decades of Nazi Collaboration: America’s Dirty Little Ukraine Secret,” in The Nation, March 28, 2014, Paul Rosenberg and Foreign Policy In Focus write that “the key organization in the coup that took place [in Kyiv in January 2014] was the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists [OUN], or a specific branch of it known as the Banderas [OUN-B]. They’re the group behind the Svoboda party, which got a number of key positions in the new… regime.”

The report says the U.S. has had a long-standing tie to the OUN. In 2004 they became part of the so-called Orange Revolution, heavily funded by the U.S., which brought Viktor Yushchenko, a close Svoboda ally, to the presidency from 2005 to 2010. “The United States was very aggressive in trying to keep the nationalists in power, but they lost the election. The U.S. was spending money through the National Endowment for Democracy,” the Nation article says.

Image
[Source: wikipedia.org]

Image
[Source: channel4.com]

Ritter summarizes, saying of the Ukrainian far right, “The CIA grew it, owned it, controlled it.” He says the U.S. organized a coup d’etat in early 2014 on the heels of the rightist protests demanding European Union membership for Ukraine.

He highlights that U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was caught in a phone call that was recorded, handpicking the U.S. choice to lead Ukraine. “We brought in the Banderistas,” Ritter says. “They came in armed, and overnight they turned a peaceful demonstration into a violent revolution that killed scores of people—horrible acts of violence. That’s what an insurrection looks like; it was orchestrated by the U.S. Biden got on the phone and told [the elected president] he ‘had to go.’ Now you’ve empowered these neo-Nazis, immediately passing laws at the expense of Russian language and culture. Slaughter in Odessa, attack on Crimea, move on Donbas. Thus began the Ukrainian civil war in Donbas.”

Image
Burning of trade union building in Odessa by neo-Nazis backed by the CIA. (April 30, 2015) [Source: theguardian.com]
Former NATO military analyst backs up Ritter

Image
Jacques Baud [Source: swissingo.ch]

Jacques Baud, a former officer in the Swiss armed forces who was the Head of Policy and Doctrine for the United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations, backs up Scott Ritter’s analysis and takes it further. He says, “Western countries have… clearly created and supported Ukrainian far-right militias. In October 2021, the Jerusalem Post sounded the alarm by denouncing the Centuria project. These militias have been operating in the Donbas since 2014, with Western support,” Baud says. “These militias, stemming from the far-right groups that led the Euromaidan revolution in 2014, are made up of fanatical and brutal individuals. The best known of these is the Azov regiment, whose emblem is reminiscent of that of the 2nd SS Das Reich Panzer Division… So the West supports and continues to arm militias that have been guilty of numerous crimes against civilian populations since 2014: rape, torture and massacres.”

Image

These forces occupied the port city of Mariupol on the Azov Sea. It is strategically located at the southwestern edge of the Donbas, on the highway to Crimea and Odessa. Mariupol has a significant Russian majority, and the 15,000 troops of the Azov regiment deployed there (but who do not live there) are seen as brutal occupiers, Ritter said.

Image
Azov regiment in Mariupol. [Source: aljazeera.com]

The Russians have done everything possible to create humanitarian corridors, in accord with international law, Ritter said. “But the Ukrainian government and Azov have tried to close them. Azov used civilians as human shields, which meant the Russians had to assault residential buildings. The Ukrainians have said it’s ‘indiscriminate shelling’—like the case of the maternity hospital, which is off limits by international law ‘unless used for unpermitted purposes,’ for instance, as a civilian target. Azov was using it for military purposes.” Jacques Baud cites the testimony of civilians from Mariupol who said that the maternity hospital was taken over by the militias of the Azov regiment, who chased out the civilian occupants, threatening them with their weapons.

The other case is a large historic theater in Mariupol. Ritter said the narrative is that 1000-plus civilians were there; the Russians said “we know they’re there and ordered our military to not attack it. No airplanes flew over the theater.” Ritter said Azov blew off the roof to create a scandal of atrocity. “When you examine forensically the destruction doesn’t look like the result of a bomb but of explosives in the roof—a false flag operation,” he said.

Image
[Source: thedailybeast.com]

“Most of the civilians are dying because Ukrainians are digging into civilian neighborhoods, forcing the Russians to blow up buildings, put down artillery barrages, and so on, killing civilians,” Ritter said. “But the numbers would be even lower if the Ukrainians obeyed the law of war… There’s one side that says we’re trying to preserve civilian lives and civilian infrastructure. We have the other side that says ‘if you collaborate with the Russians you will be killed.’”

Whose war crimes?
The cases of Bucha and Kramatorsk are especially notable. In both cases the Ukrainian government accused Russians of unspeakable atrocities, which were immediately echoed by Western governments, politicians and media, calling for Putin to be tried in The Hague for war crimes. What really happened?

In late February Russian and Ukrainian troops fought on the outskirts of Bucha, northwest of Kyiv. Russian troops took control of the city, then on March 30 the Russians withdrew. While they were there for several weeks, Ritter says the Russians “had good relations with the local people. It was peaceful. The Russians said ‘we traded our dry rations for their dairy products.’ The citizens of Bucha would give them eggs, milk and cheese, and the Russians would give them dry rations—flour, salt, sugar, meat, and so on. This was going on, then the Russians left. Anybody who engaged in that type of interaction with the Russians was now viewed as a collaborator,” Ritter said.

On March 31 Bucha’s mayor declared the city “liberated” from Russians, calling it a major victory for Ukrainian defenders, with no Russian troops left in Bucha. The announcement made no mention of murdered civilians in the locality. On April 1—two days after the Russians left—the Ukrainian national police announced they were going into Bucha “to carry out a cleansing operation to liquidate the collaborators.”

Ritter said there is a videotape of a senior political figure announcing on social media to the citizens of Bucha, “‘stay in your homes. The national police are carrying out a cleansing operation. Do not panic. Stay in your homes.’ She repeats it over and over again. Why? Because the police are in the streets, gunning people down, kicking in doors of people who were collaborating, and killing them.”

Image
[Source: theparadise.ng]

On April 2 the Ukrainian foreign minister claimed Russian troops shot and killed civilians before they left on March 30. Within minutes Western politicians were condemning Russian “war crimes” before looking at evidence and before there could be an investigation. The Russian government immediately demanded a UN Security Council meeting and called for a forensic investigation. The UK, as interim president of the Security Council, blocked the request.

Western media photos of the Bucha massacre show most of the deceased bodies wearing white armbands. Civilians used these to signal they were not hostile to Russia. The corpses were lying next to bags of humanitarian aid provided by Russian forces. In some photos fresh blood is visible, Ritter observed—the corpses had not been there for days.

On April 8 in Kramatorsk, a small Donbas city, a missile in use by Ukrainian forces hit a train station while civilian populations were evacuating. Reports said 50 people died and another 100 were wounded.

Kyiv immediately blamed the attack on Russia, but pictures of the missiles quickly made their way onto social media and were identified as Tochka-U missiles, which are currently used only by Ukrainian forces. Following this attack, the Investigative Committee of Russia announced they would open a criminal case to investigate the premeditated dissemination of false news about the Russian armed forces at the site.

Russia Strike on Ukraine Train Station Kills 50 Trying to Flee: Officials

Image
[Source: businessinsider.com]

Who’s to blame?

Jacques Baud says “the American and European political leaders deliberately pushed the Ukraine into a conflict that they knew was lost in advance—for the sole purpose of dealing a political blow to Russia… The objective was the closure of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, announced on February 8 by Joe Biden, during the visit of Olaf Scholz; and which was followed by a barrage of sanctions.”

Image
[Source: dw.com]

Now the question is when and how will it end. The U.S. and its NATO allies are rushing weapons and other equipment, including anti-aircraft and anti-ship missiles, and drones to Ukraine. Military officials, politicians and the press mainly talk of sending more weapons—not of finding a lasting, diplomatic solution to the crisis.

Image
Crates of arms for the Ukrainians. [Source: cleveland.com]

Biden has said “this battle will not be won in days or months, either. We need to steel ourselves for the long fight ahead.” That was after declaring Russian President Putin “cannot remain in power.”

This was public confirmation that the U.S. goal in Ukraine is “regime change” in Russia, no matter how long, or how many Ukrainian and Russian lives it may take—or how many people become refugees, or how the world economy will be damaged.

There is also a danger that the war will expand. All too many U.S. and NATO politicians are ready to send troops into Ukraine, risking nuclear war. Meanwhile, the U.S. also seems poised to extend the war to include China. These options are recipes for even greater disaster. Russia will continue to defend Russian speakers in eastern and southern Ukraine who have been victimized by neo-Nazi assaults. It will stop when Ukraine has been demilitarized and “de-Nazified.”

It is possible the people of Western Europe will press for an end to the sanctions, which threaten to strangle their economies. The Chinese view is that “the EU will become the biggest victim of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. It will have to bear the brunt of the conflict. Therefore, as the Ukraine crisis develops, the differences between the U.S. and Europe will become inevitable once the public opinion in major EU countries changes.”

China may have a role as mediator, based on its very significant trade relations with all parties to the conflict. That could help.

What Will Change Public Opinion?
Cutting through the propaganda that keeps people believing the official narrative has only begun. The testimony of authoritative and credible observers like Scott Ritter and Jacques Baud has not yet surfaced in mainstream media anywhere in the West. It has to be suppressed, as part of the Big Lie strategy the U.S. government and media have used in war after war from 1898 to now. From “Remember the Maine” (Cuba 1898) to the “Gulf of Tonkin Incident” (Vietnam 1964) to “Weapons of Mass Destruction” (Iraq 2002), the Big Lies have been enough to “justify” truly unprovoked aggression by the U.S.

The official phrase “unprovoked invasion of Ukraine” appears constantly. Noam Chomsky found that a Google search for this phrase returned “about 2,430,000 results” in less than half a second. Searching for “unprovoked invasion of Iraq” yielded about 11,700 results in even less time. In fact, as Max Parry wrote recently in CAM, “If there was ever to be an end to the ongoing ethnic cleansing and war crimes in the Donbass region, a Russian intervention became almost inevitable.”

Bipartisan Big Lie

“We lied, we cheated, we stole… It’s part of the glory of the American experiment,” declared former U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo back in 2019, bragging to a college audience in Texas. That unusual admission reflects the long-term, ongoing bipartisan official U.S. approach to both war and peace.

The case of Julian Assange is part of the pattern. Assange is now facing extradition from England to the U.S., after years of torture, charged with “espionage” because he publicized information about U.S. crimes in Iraq. Assange faces up to 175 years in prison (a virtual death penalty) for practicing honest journalism. His case is barely mentioned in the mainstream media. If the U.S. cared about honest journalism, Assange would get a prize.

The U.S. strategy of using Ukraine to attack Russia has existed for a long time. Former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski summed it up in his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard: “Ukraine is a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard… because its very existence as an independent country (means) Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire.”

Victoria Nuland, currently U.S. Under Secretary of State and former foreign policy adviser to Dick Cheney, has been the key U.S. point person for using Ukraine to attack Russia. She coordinated spending billions to foster and finance the 2014 fascist coup in Kyiv, and famously handpicked a new Ukrainian president. From passing out cookies to the fascists to saying “Fuck the EU,” Nuland has been the loose cannon that makes it hard to keep the official narrative believable.

How all this will end remains difficult to predict. Margaret Kimberley, editor of Black Agenda Report, says “Joe Biden and his foreign policy team of incompetent ideologues hope to convince Americans to accept food shortages, rising gas prices, and the risk of a hot war. The steady diet of dangerous nonsense is a necessity for them. The game is up if the people begin to question what they are being told.” She adds that the latest opinion poll shows Biden with a 33% approval rating. “The average person may not be well versed in the history of U.S. policy towards Russia, but they know when things don’t add up,” Kimberley says. “Rambling, incoherent speeches punctuated by shouts of ‘war criminal’ and ‘genocide’ don’t cut it when working people can barely afford to put gas in the tank. We are left with a mass gaslighting effort that has created the desired effect of generating fear and or hatred towards Russia, but that hasn’t increased satisfaction about the country’s direction.”

Public opinion, both in the U.S. and Europe, will eventually turn against the official Big Lie. The question remains: can public opinion—and pressure—change soon enough to prevent global disaster?

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2022/0 ... raine-war/

********************************

Adventures of a sniper "Vali" in Ukraine
May 7, 5:40 p.m.

Image

The story of the adventures of the Canadian sniper "Vali" in Ukraine. In our country, along the way, they managed to declare him "killed in Mariupol" (where he had not been at all), and among the Ukrainians, they said that he had already opened his combat account. The reality turned out to be a little different.

Details of the adventures of foreign mercenaries in Ukraine

Canadian newspaper La Presse published ( https://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/2022 ... n-terrible php ) an interview with the sniper Vali, who returned from Ukraine, about whom Ukrainian propaganda methodically made legends. In short, "one of the best snipers in the world" fired only two shots in two months. By the windows. This war is a complete sham."

Most mercenaries return home disappointed, having never been to the front.
"I'm lucky that I'm still alive at all, we walked on the edge."

The last straw was the combat mission, in which the mercenaries acted together with Ukrainian conscripts. At the position, which was under fire from Russian tanks, two Ukrainian soldiers rose to smoke. Vali tried to stop them, but they didn't listen. A few seconds later, a shell flew at them "with jewelry accuracy". "The explosion was terrible. I suddenly lost my hearing and felt a headache. It was tough." Vali realized that the Ukrainians could no longer be helped. "It smelled of death. It's hard to describe, a terrible smell of burnt flesh, sulfur and chemicals. An inhuman smell."

After that, Vali called his wife. "He tried to explain that he had witnessed two deaths. He said: I think I've done enough already, huh? Have I done enough? Like he wanted me to tell him to go home.”
For most of the mercenaries who crossed the border, the process of finding a unit to join was chaotic and agonizing. "Zelensky called everyone, but the officers on the ground were absolutely helpless. They didn't know what to do with us."

Wali himself and several other Canadians joined the Normandy Brigade, a private mercenary force commanded by a retired Canadian soldier from Quebec with the call sign "Hrulf". However, members of the brigade immediately began to show discontent, many deserted. Three mercenaries told La Presse that Hrulf promised them weapons and protective equipment, but in the end did nothing. Some of the mercenaries were 40 kilometers from the front without body armor.

“If the Russians had launched an offensive, we would all have been in danger. It was the irresponsibility of the brigade command,” admits one of the mercenaries.

The desertion of mercenaries is confirmed by the commander of the "Norman Brigade" Hrulf himself. According to him, about 60 people deserted in total. Some wanted to conclude a contract on terms that would grant them combatant status and guarantee medical care at the expense of the Ukrainian authorities. Others tried to set up a scam to steal $500,000 provided by the Americans.

"Many expected everything to be easy and simple, but in war it's the other way around. It was a terrible disappointment ," Vali concludes.
To find the weapon, one had to go through Kafkaesque adventures."You need to know someone who knows someone else who will say that in this old barbershop they can give you an AK-47. All equipment must be collected piece by piece, here and there, sometimes in good condition, sometimes not."

Mercenaries also obtained food and gasoline themselves. "Even food was often given to us by civilians. The same with gasoline to fill up the car. You constantly need to decide something, to know the right people."

A few weeks later, the most trained mercenaries were selected by the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine and, according to them, began to be involved in operations behind enemy lines. The rest roam around rented housing and wait until someone agrees to take them into their squad.
At the same time, most of the mercenaries decided to return home."Many people come to Ukraine and want to fight, but they leave with their tails between their legs," says Vali.

Ultimately, Vali admits, he himself fired two shots at the windows "to scare" the enemy, and in reality was never in the enemy's range of fire. "This is a war of technology, where the brave Ukrainian soldiers suffer heavy losses under fire and miss a lot of opportunities due to lack of technical training."

Thanks for the material to the subscriber named "Tolyanchik"

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/47365 - zinc

Plus the material on the mercenary brigade itself.

Extravagant commander and lack of weapons: Canadian mercenary about serving in the Normandy Brigade

Since March, the so-called unofficially operates in Ukraine. The Normandy Brigade is a group of mostly Canadian mercenaries. The unit consists of several dozen fighters and is actually part of the "International Legion of Ukraine", although legally it is in no way connected with the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The "Normandy Brigade" is not subordinate to the Ukrainian forces and acts as a kind of PMC in the southeast direction.

The National Post newspaper published an interview with a Canadian mercenary ( https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/tu ... in-ukraine ) Paul, who spoke about the terrible conditions of service and suicidal behavior of the commander of the "brigade":

▪️Paul, 27, is a veteran of the French Foreign Legion and lived in Ottawa. In early April, he recruited several Canadians and went with them to Ukraine. In the Normandy Brigade, he became deputy commander, but soon became disillusioned with the unit.

▪️The "brigade" is led by a former French legionnaire from Quebec, callsign "Hrulf". He is obsessed with liberating his Ukrainian wife's native village and sports a tattoo of the Black Sun, popular among local nationalists. The hero of the interview says that Khrulf is unable to provide either the supply of his unit or the coordination of actions with the Ukrainians. The "Normans" literally live in dungeons, sleep on the floors, starve and are constantly sick.

“This is everything our grandfathers fought against in the Second World War, ” say colleagues.

▪️

▪️The second problem of the Normandy Brigade is the total shortage of weapons. According to its veterans, only a third of Khrulf's subordinates received AK-47s and one or two magazines of cartridges. The rest were sent unarmed to the front lines to dig trenches, handing out weapons for staged photos for Facebook reports. At the same time, Khrulf accepted donations on behalf of the brigade and sold paraphernalia, but the mercenaries did not receive new weapons.

▪️"Hrulf" constantly risks his subordinates, throwing untrained mercenaries into battle, while he himself "makes himself some kind of stupid Easter commander."

“He puts the lives of unsuspecting young Canadians in danger who just want to go and watch the fight. It's just crazy, real suicide, ”says Paul.

▪️In Canada, the Normandy Brigade is already being denied support. The founder of the FightforUkraine.ca portal, Chris Eklund, dissuades Canadians from joining the Khrulf team, calling it incompetent.

▪️After a public conflict with the commander, Paul and other mercenaries left the "Norman Brigade" and joined the "International Legion", considering it a more organized structure. Khrulf's only defender, sniper Vali, who left in March, assures that the conditions in the "brigade" are the same as in any foreign unit in Ukraine.

https://t.me/rybar/32327 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7601495.html

Google Translator

************************************

From Cassar's Telegram account:

***

forwarded from
Rybar
🇬🇧🇺🇦Snake Island and the Keys to the North-West of the Black Sea

The events on Snake Island off the coast of Odessa are shrouded in the fog of war: in the scarce reports of the Ministry of Defense, there are only reports of destroyed UAVs, not a single military correspondent is on the spot, and Ukrainians constantly report wrecked ships and post videos of the injured " Raptors" or "Cerne".

▪️Now Bayraktar TB2 UAVs are working almost daily on the positions of the RF Armed Forces on the island . The ultimate goal is the landing of Ukrainian troops on the island : Mi-8 helicopters have been deployed to the Chervonoglinsky airfield in Odessa, ready to transfer personnel on command.

▪️American M777 howitzers with 155-mm M982 Excalibur guided active rockets were deployed to the Zatoka area . They will have to work at almost the maximum range - 60 km. But howitzers can also work on Russian positions on the island itself, and on the grouping of ships around it.

▪️Target designation and reconnaissance is provided by American reconnaissance aircraft, which practically do not leave the area of ​​the mission.

Yesterday, through the collective efforts of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and NATO allies, the Tor air defense system on the island was partially disabled. After that, the Ukrainian Air Force tried to make a massive raid on the island: in addition to unmanned aircraft, they attracted at least two pairs of Su-24 and Su-27 tactical aircraft .

The ship's air defense systems and fighters worked out by air: two Bayraktar TB2 UAVs and one aircraft were shot down . The rest got away.

Why Serpentine?

The island is strategically important not only because of its location near the southern borders of Odessa. Without control over Serpentine, it will be much more difficult to conduct a potentially naval amphibious operation on the Ukrainian coast.

And for Ukraine and the allies, the restoration of control over the island is an opportunity to deploy stationary radar stations, control the air and sea space around Odessa and begin an operation to unblock it. This is important for the supply of weapons and military equipment from the West by sea.

No matter how much we make fun of the "mosquito fleet", but it exists. And it is foolish to underestimate it - especially when all target designation and intelligence are provided by allies from the NATO bloc.

And also Serpentine is a symbol. Remember about the “dead defenders” of the island, who later turned out to be alive? Now imagine that the Ukrainians will recapture the island and begin to inflate the story of a heroic deed, recaptured lines and revenge for the fallen and prisoners?

Therefore, one should not assume that the grouping of the Russian Navy in the Black Sea "does nothing" near Odessa. This is a very important sector of the front. And the intensity of the fighting there will only increase.
#Snake #Odessa #Russia #Ukraine @rybar *Support us: | (ETH) | (BTC)

Image

***

forwarded from
Readovka
Map of hostilities and the situation on the fronts on the evening of May 6

Large-scale maneuvers of NATO countries continue in the immediate vicinity of the borders of Ukraine . The alliance’s invasion of Western Ukraine under a fictitious pretext is becoming more real, and most importantly, it is necessary for Kiev, because it will free up resources and transfer additional units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to the Donetsk front. Yesterday, Polish President Andrzej Duda made a very unambiguous statement about this.

⚔️On the fronts along the entire length of the line of contact, today there is a classic general battle. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to counterattack near Kharkov in the direction of the border, we are advancing in the area of ​​Liman, Yampol, Severodonetsk, making our way to Popasna, pressing from Zaporozhye and Donetsk.

▪️Near Kharkov , the situation was not simple. The Ukrainian Armed Forces are trying to counterattack in the direction of the border. After the withdrawal of units of the RF Armed Forces from Stary Saltov , the issue of withdrawing units from the northeastern outskirts of Kharkov was a matter of time. In order to prevent the encirclement of the RF Armed Forces in the boiler, the command made a decision to withdraw Russian units from Tsirkuny, Cherkassky Tishki and Liptsy (settlements between Kharkov and the border of the Russian Federation). It is reported that the VSUshnikov have already been seen in Liptsy. You need to understand that this is not an attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which knocked us out of there, but Ukraine occupied empty villages. Our units retreated to the north. Dear comrades report that the RF Armed Forces control a 7-8-kilometer buffer zone north of Kharkov. In general, this is not critical, but creates some tension.

▪️On the Izyum part of the front, the Armed Forces of Ukraine pulled up reserves, reinforced with artillery, hit MLRS and Tochki-U to a great depth. As reported from the field, " Izyum itself and even the territory to the north of it are in the zone of effective fire of enemy cannon and rocket artillery." Allied forces are breaking through enemy defenses to the south. Near the Liman our progress slowed down a bit due to forest fires.

▪️ It is interesting in the Luhansk sector : ours have completed the cleaning of the residential quarters of Rubizhne , the last enemy units have strengthened at the Zarya gunpowder factory. Yesterday taken n.p. Voevodovka (between Rubizhne and Severodonetsk ). In the eastern quarters of Severodonetsk and in the forests from Voevodovka , there are battles where the Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to counterattack today. The establishment of full control over Severodonetsk is impossible without the occupation of Lisichansk , located on the high western bank of the Donets. From the south towards Lisichanskunits of the NM LPR are advancing. There is little progress, there are battles in Nizhny and Orekhovo . Fighting continues in Popasna, literally for every building. "Music of War" plays to the fullest there, Wagner leads the "orchestra".

▪️In the Donetsk direction, everything is the same, with the exception of a successful offensive in the Gorlovka region . Troitskoye is occupied , an offensive is developing towards New York .

▪️In Zaporozhye today, Russian troops using aviation and artillery launched an attack on the settlement. Gulyaipole and Orekhov . The Armed Forces of Ukraine suffer losses in manpower and equipment. Ukrainian troops attacked the city of Pologi : there are civilian casualties.

▪️In Mariupol , the evacuation of civilians continued today, including from Azovstal. During the day, 50 civilians were rescued, including 11 children , the Ministry of Defense reported. There was an incident: militants tried to break out of the plant in a car. The attempt was thwarted by a well-aimed shot from an ATGM. One immediately “went to Bandera”, six more will suffer.

▪️In the southern direction from Kherson, on the right bank of the Dnieper, the Russian army seems to want to break through to Krivoy Rog. A large fire of unknown origin near Odessa .

🌐In the world. Pridnestrovie is not going to attack Ukraine, it is impossible, said PMR President Krasnoselsky. Escalation between China and Taiwan: 8 Chinese military aircraft entered the air defense zone of Taiwan, which tensed up and came to the maximum combat readiness.

👁From the interesting: a new batch of prisoners .
The servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine complain that the command took them to combat positions and left them to fight with the advancing tanks, having given only pistols, machine guns and a couple of grenades in their hands.

Image

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sat May 07, 2022 9:54 pm

Did UN Secretary-General Guterres Commit A War Crime At Azovstal?
Posted on May 7, 2022 by Yves Smith

Yves here. I’m at a loss to understand why the West continues to flog the dead horse of the Azovstal factory. The soldiers in there are trapped and will be starved out. The media push to pretend they are putting up a fight is absurd, since their leader/spokesman has been begging to be rescued, and this week, to barter civilian captives for food.

The press is bizarrely ignoring the fact that if there are civilians in there (and since some did emerge, it appears yes, but fewer in number that the Ukrainians pretended) who aren’t coming out even though they are hungry, it sure suggests that they are being detained.

Now admittedly, there is a less pernicious reason for the civilians to stay hunkered down in the Azovstal factory: they might have been persuaded that they’d be sent off to a gulag or worse. So the UN could play a role in persuading them that nothing bad would happen if they left. But as you’ll see from Helmer’s post, there’s more to this story…

Antonio Guterres, the United Nations Secretary-General, is refusing this week to answer questions on the role he played in the recent attempt by US, British, Canadian and other foreign combatants to escape the bunkers under the Azovstal plant, using the human shield of civilians trying to evacuate.

In Guterres’s meeting with President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin on April 26 (lead image), Putin warned Guterres he had been “misled” in his efforts. “The simplest thing”, Putin told Guterres in the recorded part of their meeting, “for military personnel or members of the nationalist battalions is to release the civilians. It is a crime to keep civilians, if there are any there, as human shields.”

This war crime has been recognized since 1977 by the UN in Protocol 1 of the Geneva Convention. In US law for US soldiers and state officials, planning to employ or actually using human shields is a war crime to be prosecuted under 10 US Code Section 950t.

Instead, Guterres ignored the Kremlin warning and the war crime law, and authorized UN officials, together with Red Cross officials, to conceal what Guterres himself knew of the foreign military group trying to escape. Overnight from New York, Guterres has refused to say what he knew of the military escape operation, and what he had done to distinguish, or conceal the differences between the civilians and combatants in the evacuation plan over the weekend of April 30-May 1.May.

Russian officials have remained publicly polite towards Guterres, despite what Moscow regards as his taking sides with the US, the NATO alliance, and the Kiev government from the beginning of the military operation on February 24. “We are dealing”, the Secretary-General declared on April 5, “with the full-fledged invasion, on several fronts, of one Member State of the United Nations, Ukraine, by another, the Russian Federation — a permanent member of the Security Council — in violation of the United Nations Charter, and with several aims, including redrawing the internationally recognized borders between the two countries.”*

Putin told Guterres his interpretation of the military operation and of the UN Charter was wrong and biased.

“I know,” Putin said as the cameras recorded, “about your concern over Russia’s military operation in Donbass, in Ukraine. I think this will be the focus of our conversation today. I would just like to note in this context that the entire problem emerged after a coup d’état staged in Ukraine in 2014. This is an obvious fact. You can call it whatever name you like and have whatever bias in favour of those who did it, but this was really an anti-constitutional coup.”

Putin was explicit that he rejected Guterres’s claim that the Russian military operation violated the Charter: “Unfortunately, our colleagues in the West preferred to ignore all this. After we recognised the independence of these states [Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics], they asked us to render them military aid because they were subjected to military actions, an armed aggression. In accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, Chapter VII, we were forced to do this by launching a special military operation.”

“It is a fact that many Western countries recognised Kosovo as an independent state.* We did the same with the Donbass republics. After that, they asked us to provide them with military assistance to deal with the state that launched military operations against them. We had the right to do so in full compliance with Chapter VII, Article 51 of the UN Charter. Just a second, we will talk about this in a minute. But first I would like to address the second part of your question, Mariupol. The situation is difficult and possibly even tragic there. But in fact, it is very simple.”

To Guterres, Putin also made a clear distinction between civilians and combatants using the civilians as hostages or human shields. Putin identified this as a war crime. “The Azovstal plant has been fully isolated. I have issued instructions, an order to stop the assault. There is no direct fighting there now. Yes, the Ukrainian authorities say that there are civilians at the plant. In this case, the Ukrainian military must release them, or otherwise they will be doing what terrorists in many countries have done, what ISIS did in Syria when they used civilians as human shields. The simplest thing they can do is release these people; it is as simple as that. You say that Russia’s humanitarian corridors are ineffective. Mr Secretary-General, you have been misled: these corridors are effective. Over 100,000 people, 130,000–140,000, if I remember correctly, have left Mariupol with our assistance, and they are free to go where they want, to Russia or Ukraine. They can go anywhere they want; we are not detaining them, but we are providing assistance and support to them.”

“The civilians in Azovstal, if there are any, can do this as well. They can come out, just like that. This is an example of a civilised attitude to people, an obvious example. And anyone can see this; you only need to talk with the people who have left the city. The simplest thing for military personnel or members of the nationalist battalions is to release the civilians. It is a crime to keep civilians, if there are any there, as human shields.”

In his many public statements before the Kremlin meeting, and in his remarks at the Russian Foreign Ministry the same day, , Guterres has not mentioned war crimes except to repeat the US and Ukrainian allegations about the Russian side. “The war has led to senseless loss of life, massive devastation in urban centres and the destruction of civilian infrastructure,” he said on April 5. “I will never forget the horrifying images of civilians killed in Bucha. I immediately called for an independent investigation to guarantee effective accountability. I am also deeply shocked by the personal testimony of rapes and sexual violence that are now emerging. The High Commissioner for Human Rights has spoken of possible war crimes, grave breaches of international humanitarian law and serious violations of international human rights law. The war has displaced more than 10 million people in just one month — the fastest forced population movement since the Second World War.”

Two weeks later, on April 19, Guterres announced his plan for the evacuation of the Azovstal bunkers, mentioning only “civilians”. “The intense concentration of forces and firepower makes this battle inevitably more violent, bloody and destructive. The onslaught and terrible toll on civilians we have seen so far could pale in comparison to the horror that lies ahead. This cannot be allowed to happen….The humanitarian pause would provide the necessary conditions to meet two crucial imperatives. First, safe passage of all civilians willing to leave the areas of current and expected confrontation, in coordination with the International Committee of the Red Cross. Second, beyond humanitarian operations already taking place, a pause will allow for the safe delivery of life-saving humanitarian aid to people in the hardest-hit areas such as Mariupol, Kherson, Donetsk and Luhansk. The United Nations is ready to send humanitarian aid convoys during this period to these locations. We are submitting detailed plans to the parties. Humanitarian needs are dire. People do not have food, water, supplies to treat the sick or wounded, or simply to live day to day.”

When Guterres and Putin met the following week, on April 26, the Russians already suspected Guterres of planning his civilian evacuation scene to conceal the escape of the foreign officers from their Azovstal bunker. He was warned privately. Putin’s remarks were the public warning. Guterres stuck to his position in the only remark the Russian media caught him as saying at the meeting: “We are deeply concerned about what is happening now. We believe that there has been an invasion of the territory of Ukraine.”

The Defense Ministry spokesman, Major-General Igor Konashenkov (right), had announced on April 17 that “up to four hundred foreign mercenaries were trapped [at Azovstal]… Most of them are citizens of European countries, as well as Canada. We have already reported earlier that radio conversations between militants in Mariupol are conducted in six foreign languages”. Konashenkov also announced that in addition to these foreigners there were up to 2,100 Ukrainian troops in Azovstal.

The Russian intelligence at the time was that far fewer civilians had been taken hostage or had voluntarily sought shelter in the Azovstal bunkers. It would turn out, two weeks later, that the number of civilians was 101. They were outnumbered by the foreign and Ukrainian combatants twenty-five to one.

Guterres knew this before he arrived in Moscow. There on April 26, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov revealed that Guterres had been briefed for several weeks by his own officials on the human shield and hostage-taking tactics of the Ukrainian forces during the battle for Mariupol, and inside the Azovstal bunker. “After the UN Secretary-General contacted our Defence Ministry on March 4, 2022,” Lavrov said in Guterres’s presence, “we established the Joint Coordination Headquarters for Humanitarian Response at the National Defence Control Centre of the Russian Federation. UN representatives are coordinating practical matters to organise safe humanitarian deliveries.”

Yesterday, May 5 New York time, Guterres was asked three questions to clarify what he had known about the combatants at Azovstal; when he had known it; and how he proposed to the Russians he met — as well as to the Ukrainians – to distinguish between the civilians and the combatants in the evacuation.

By John Helmer who has been the longest continuously serving foreign correspondent in Russia, and the only western journalist to have directed his own bureau independent of single national or commercial ties. Helmer has also been a professor of political science, and advisor to government heads in Greece, the United States, and Asia. Originally published at Dances with Bears

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2022/05 ... vstal.html

********************************

From Cassar's Telegram account:

***

forwarded from
Older than Edda
Currently, the main hostilities south of Izyum unfolded in the forests. The enemy turned them into fortified areas in advance and, relying on them, defends settlements, trying to act on our communications.

Yesterday, during the next execution of the task, a group of our special forces went to another enemy fortification in the "Sherwood Forest". A battle ensued, the enemy called for help, the superior forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine tried to encircle our people, but ran into their own minefield.

Having lost 8 people killed, the enemy tried to retreat, but was destroyed by our special forces.
As a result, the forest fortification was taken, 16 bodies of the enemy remained in place, it is not clear how much he lost in general. As a result of the battle, we have no losses, and this is not a stupid tracing paper from dill propaganda.

***

forwarded from
Poddubny |Z|О|V| edition
Polish mercenaries and military personnel have been willingly fighting in Ukraine for a long time. This statement was made by the Polish political scientist Konrad Renkas.

In his opinion, it is much easier for Poland and other NATO countries to send the already trained military of the Alliance to Ukraine than to retrain the Ukrainian ones. Without the intervention of Western experts, weapons supplied to Ukraine will not shoot and drive by themselves.

[…] “It is known that citizens of the Republic of Poland are already fighting in Ukraine, and these are not demonstrative volunteers, but mercenaries and military men sent there on orders. The participation of foreigners in the conflict will grow - after all, the equipment and weapons sent in bulk to the Kyiv authorities will not fire themselves. […] the tragedy of the Ukrainians is that in this situation, hostilities can continue until the last Ukrainian soldier sent to the front in the criminal plans of Kyiv and the West. However, even then Ukraine will not cease to be a battlefield, because the Poles, Canadians, British and others will continue to fight in Ukrainian uniforms, just to support this blazing fire,” Renkas said.

***

forwarded from
Chinese army
🇬🇧🇺🇦Now the situation near Mariupol is hitting hard on Zelensky’s rating Zelensky’s

office has set the task of calling all the messages surrounded by fighters at Azovstal a “Russian fake.”

A meeting was held in Kiev on the topic: "How to minimize rehearsal losses from the Russian blockade of Azovstal." Yermak and his advisers are especially concerned about the messages that militants send to their loved ones in instant messengers. There are very negative things about the authorities. Thus, they seriously undermine Zelensky's rating and destabilize the entire system of Ukrainian military propaganda.

As a result of the meeting, it was decided to call these messages “Russian fakes”. Allegedly, the phones of the fighters were captured by the Russians. And now their intelligence agencies are sending panic messages.

***

Сolonelcassad
According to Aksyonov, gas and electricity to the liberated territories of the Kherson region will be supplied from the Crimea. Work is already underway to restore power lines that were destroyed in 2014-2015 as part of the “energy blockade of Crimea,” when the Poroshenko gang tried to deprive Crimea of ​​electricity in the hope that Russia would make concessions. We then lived for several months with blackouts, while the energy bridge across the Kerch Strait was being built super-efficiently.

***

forwarded from
Chinese army
🇺🇸🇬🇧🇺🇦 Former head of the US Special Operations Command in Europe, retired Major General Mike Repass: NATO should create special units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Ukraine to conduct

offensive operations Great Britain, Germany) should assist in the formation of strategic forces within the Armed Forces of Ukraine from five brigades with a total number of 40 thousand soldiers and their training on their territory. 2. It will take 6-8 months to implement the plans. 3. Equip the brigades with Western weapons and equipment. 4. Ukraine is able to find the specified number of military, given the current situation in the country.

The United States plans to use the prepared Ukrainian reserves once again as cannon fodder to contain Russia and prolong the conflict. Washington openly says, not embarrassed by its statements, what goals it pursues:
1. It is necessary to weaken Russia by strengthening the capabilities of Ukraine.
2. It is necessary to continue to contain Russia, building up our own capabilities and NATO.
3. "Degradation" of the armed forces and potential of Russia.
4. It is necessary to ensure the defeat of Russia in Ukraine by creating a strategic and operational reserve for Ukraine, which supposedly will be able to conduct offensive operations.
CNN

***

forwarded from
Operation Z: Military commissars of the Russian Spring
‼️🇺🇦🇩🇪Der Spiegel removed a report from a Ukrainian woman evacuated from Azovstal, who said that the Nazis did not release civilians.

The German Junge Welt, in the article “I thought I wouldn’t survive,” writes that Spiegel published a three-minute video with a woman talking about the shelling and the difficult living conditions in the bunker.

Der Spiegel itself said that the video belonged to Reuters, but removed it due to "subsequently identified inconsistencies in content." It is clear that it contradicted Western Russophobic propaganda.

Recall that the evacuee also pointed out that the militants hid information about the gum corridors and regularly searched the houses of Mariupol residents.
t.me/RVvoenkor

***

forwarded from
Andrey Medvedev
Tonight, several colleagues wrote at once about the situation in the Kharkov region . Where, allegedly, the Armed Forces of Ukraine went on the offensive. The Ukrainian segment of Telegram at least writes about this. But believing Ukrainian propaganda is so-so business.

However, it is important to understand the realities in which we find ourselves. And they are such that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are really actively attacking in this area. And under the control of the Russian army in some places there remains a not very wide buffer zone to our border.

And now about the main thing. Many times my colleagues and I wrote that modern warfare is multidimensional. This is the front, information, ideology, economics. It is only from this position that the current situation should be considered.

How is Ukrainian politics structured? I would venture to guess that I understand it perfectly. And because I read it, it was the case of Kulish, Drahomanov and Dontsov in the original, in Ukrainian, or Grabyanka in the Old Ukrainian type (actually, a dialect of Russian). And because I know the history of Little Russia well, better than sometimes the Ukrainians themselves. And historical experience influences everything.

So Ukrainian politics today is primarily external informational victories. The result doesn't matter. It doesn't even matter the process. It is important how you talk about it, how you present it. The shell is more important than the filling. So the Cossack commanders in the 17th century bought fake family trees for themselves to look like the Polish gentry.

So what am I all for? Despite the fact that the NVO is going hard, that our army is moving with difficulty, that there are losses, the situation in Kyiv is becoming more and more difficult. Mariupol is lost. It is impossible to hold back the slow, but sure, offensive in the LDNR. Kherson, as said today, will now also be Russian. Apparently, and Zaporozhye. At the same time, Ukrainian wives and mothers sit in Russian Telegram channels, looking for their loved ones. Among the dead and prisoners, of course. And there are more than three thousand prisoners in the DPR alone. In other words, we need an urgent and, as it were, impressive victory. This is how Ukrainian politics works.

And in such a situation, the most appropriate thing is not the attack on the Crimean bridge, which was announced by some Latvian comrade .
But the strike on the grouping near Kharkov, access to the border of Russia, and - here, in general, a Kyiv dream - capture for half an hour for the sake of a picture of the border crossing and customs, this is quite possible, this is very bright from a media point of view. And we understand how approvingly the Western media will cover this. Especially after German journalists today cleaned up references to the atrocities of the Nazis from Azov in their reports, because it does not correspond to the image of a fighter against the Stalinist Judeo -Bolshevism of the Kremlin occupation.

From a military point of view, a breakthrough to the border will have little effect on the outcome of the entire NWO. Kherson and Zaporozhye against the buffer zone. But, locally, and from a military point of view, such a breakthrough to the border is also a so-so story. The shelling of our territory will become much easier for terrorists from the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the National Battalions. And then they will have to be kicked out again. And in general, where Kherson is, there is Kharkov. Well, so as not to get up twice, as they say.

That is, it is easier to supervise this story in the bud, and to strangle an offensive attempt - if it goes on. In order not to leave the slightest chance not only for a breakthrough. But first of all, on an information attack, on an information preremogu.

Here, for a long time, you can go into an info attack yourself. There, three thousand prisoners are sitting idle. They drive the Balda, they eat rations. Create an anti-war call center, let them call under control to all acquaintances, relatives, brothers, former girlfriends, classmates. And they tell how their bosses threw them, and how they feel good in captivity. It will be more powerful than "your bank's security service".
Telegram

***

forwarded from
Rybar
❗️🇬🇧🇺🇦The situation in the Nikolaev-Kherson direction by the end of May 7, 2022

We have updated the front line in southern Ukraine, and now it reflects reality as much as possible.

▪️Position at the front:

➖The RF Armed Forces are holding the line east of Pervomaisky , which is in a semi-encirclement. Further, the front line was established along the left bank of the Ingulets River up to Vysokopole and Petrovka .

➖Fortified areas of the RF Armed Forces are deployed in Zeleny Gai and Aleksandrovka . From there, the RF Armed Forces control the operational situation to the east and south of Nikolaev. The regional center is under full fire control of the Russian troops.

➖To the north-west of Novovorontsovka in the Krivoy Rog direction (crossroads of Krivoy Rog - Apostolovo - Zelenodolsk next to the railway crossing) a powerful fortified area of ​​the Armed Forces of Ukraine was created.

▪️Plans of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and building up the grouping:

➖The command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is trying to launch a counteroffensive on the positions of the Russian Armed Forces in Aleksandrovka and expand the zone of control around Posad-Pokrovsky on the border of the Kherson and Nikolaev regions. A few days ago, the rotation and re-equipment of the units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the direction of Aleksandrovka was completed.

➖On the night of May 6-7, personnel of the 43rd brigade arrived at the Trihaty railway station with self-propelled guns 2S7 "Peony" - part of them had already been transferred to the Kryvyi Rih sector of the front in the area of ​​​​the settlement. Dawn .

➖Boats of the Ukrainian Navy, equipped with Western-made MANPADS, as well as the medium landing ship " Yuri Olifirenko " with launchers of the Grad MLRS on board, are located in the waters of the Dnieper-Bug Estuary .

▪️Shots and strikes:

➖The Russian Aerospace Forces carried out strikes on the Martynovka airfield in the Voznesensky district, where tactical aviation was based, involved in strikes on Zmeiny Island .

➖Attacks were made on the objects of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Nikolaev itself .

➖In the Kherson region , the Armed Forces of Ukraine fired on the settlement. Naked Pier . One person died and several were injured.

Image

***
https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*******************************************

Popasnaya was taken
May 8, 12:12 p.m.

Image

It was painfully long, but still.
Today they took Popasnaya. The remnants of the forces of the 24th brigade left their positions in the city in the morning and retreated.
The city center is completely controlled by our troops. Cleansing is still going on in the northern and western outskirts.
In fact, the biggest success in recent days. Now new opportunities are opening up for an offensive in the direction of Artemovsk.
It is also worth noting that after the capture of Popasna, only 2 unliberated large settlements remained on the territory of the LPR - Lisichansk and Severodonetsk.

Image
Image

Plus video from Popasna https://t.me/boris_rozhin/47520

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7602143.html

Briefly about Ukraine. 07.05.2022
May 7, 22:29

Image

Briefly about Ukraine. 07.05.2022

1. Mariupol.
The process of evacuating civilians from the territory of Azovstal has been completed. The resumption of intensive bombing of the remaining Nazis is expected, as well as a further reduction in the territory controlled by them after losing positions at the waste heaps.

2. Zaporozhye.
On the Kamenskoye-Orekhov-Gulyaipole line, fighting continued south of Orekhov and on the outskirts of Gulyaipole. Positional battles also continued to the east of Gulyaipole to Velikaya Novoselovka.

3. Carbon.
There is no serious progress on the Novomikhailovka-Ugledar-Velikaya Novoselovka line. Fights are mostly positional in nature.

4. Marinka.
There is no significant progress in the village. As before, the battles are going on in the area of ​​the waste heap.

5. Avdiivka.
There is no progress in the industrial zone of Avdiivka. To the north of Avdiivka, fighting continued at Novoselka-2, Novobakhmutovka, and in the area of ​​Troitskoye in the direction of New York.

6. LPR.
A significant advance in Popasna led to the fact that the enemy withdrew most of the forces from the city. It is reported about the cleansing of the northern regions of Popasna. Perhaps in the near future the capture of Popasna will be announced, which opens the way for advancement to Artemovsk. In Severodonetsk, fighting is taking place on the outskirts, and the front is also approaching Lisichansk. Over the past couple of days, Voevodovka and Svetlichnoye have been taken, the enemy has lost some of its positions on the outskirts of Severodonetsk. There are signs of preparations for the withdrawal of part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from Severodonetsk to Lysychansk.

7. Kharkov.
After moving away from Stary Saltov, which was occupied by the LNR reservists, the RF Armed Forces withdrew from several villages on the outskirts of Kharkov, leaving Tsirkuny among them. The enemy continues to strain the secondary direction for the RF Armed Forces in order to force them to ease pressure on the Izyum direction and transfer forces to the Kharkov direction. A perfectly reasonable strategy. The RF Armed Forces apparently plan to be more active here only after the completion of operations in the Donbass. Nevertheless, the situation certainly requires strengthening the front on the Kazachya Lopan-Volchansk line.

8. Raisins.
Fighting continues in the area of ​​Bolshaya Kamyshevakhi, as well as to the north of the Slavyansk-Barvenkovo ​​highway. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to stay in the Krasny Liman area, and are also strengthening Seversk. Slavyansk and Kramatorsk are being systematically attacked.

9. Nikolaev.
Positional battles of medium intensity continue + positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Nikolaev are regularly processed by MLRS and various missiles. There is no traffic on the Nikopol and Krivoy Rog directions.

10. Odessa.
The enemy continues to declare the possibility of an amphibious assault near Odessa, and also continues to arrange provocations on the border with Transnistria. In addition, Ukraine tried to arrange an amphibious assault on Serpent's Island, which ended in failure and heavy losses in mating. parts. However, it is clear that, with NATO support, an attempt is being made to change the balance of power in the northwestern part of the Black Sea.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/47491 - zinc

Google Translator.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Sun May 08, 2022 2:24 pm

Russia Completes Evacuation of Civilians From Azovstal Plant

Image
The evacuation of civilians from the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol ended on Saturday due to unprecedented measures by Russia. | Photo: Twitter @Filomen03258997

Published 8 May 2022

According to Mizintsev, 51 people, including 18 men, 22 women, 11 minors, were rescued during such operations.

The Russian National Defense Management Center reports the completion of the operation to evacuate civilians from Azovstal in the Ukrainian city of Mariupol.

"Thanks to the unprecedented measures of the leadership of the Russian Federation, with the active participation of the representatives of the United Nations Organization (UN) and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the humanitarian operation to evacuate civilians from the Azovstal steel plant was completed today [May 7]," the head of the aforementioned Russian Center, Colonel General Mikhail Mizintsev, said at a briefing on Saturday.


According to Mizintsev, 51 people, including 18 men, 22 women, 11 minors, were rescued during such operations.

The Russian official also made it clear that the evacuees were provided with security guarantees and received medical and psychological assistance. He added that such civilians were transferred to the temporary accommodation places.

The Kremlin reiterates that civilians and servicemen who lay down their arms will be allowed to leave the Azovstal plant in Mariupol without negotiations.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0001.html

*************************************************

They denounce that Ukraine plans assassinations to blame Russia

Image
The Ukrainian corvette destroyed in Odessa, Tarantul class according to NATO classification, belonged to the project 1241 of the Ukrainian Navy. | Photo: @rianru
Posted May 8, 2022 (4 hours 6 minutes ago)

The destroyed corvette had four anti-ship missiles that could pose a serious threat to large ships.

Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said on Sunday that high-precision missiles fired by Russian forces destroyed a Ukrainian corvette on Saturday night near the Odessa region.

“Overnight, high-precision aerial missiles of the Russian Aerospace Forces destroyed the command post of a mechanized brigade in the Pyatikhatka region of the Kharkov region and the communications center of the Chervonoglinskoye military airfield in the area of ​​the Kharkov settlement. Artsyz. In addition, a Ukrainian Navy project 1241 corvette was destroyed in the Odessa region,” the official said.

The corvette was Tarantul class, according to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) classification, developed in the 1970s and equipped with four anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles.


Similarly, the colonel general explained that two Su-24 bombers and a Ukrainian Mi-24 helicopter were shot down on the island of Zmeíny, near Odessa.

As part of the military operation deployed by Russia in Ukraine, this Saturday the aviation attacked 130 Ukrainian military objects, including three command points and two artillery ammunition stores.

In addition, the Russian air defense intercepted a Bayraktat TB-2 drone in the Odessa area. Another 56 command posts, 32 artillery fire positions, 415 areas of concentration of troops and military equipment, as well as two S-300 air defense systems were bombed.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-di ... -0005.html

Google Translator

************************************

Image

NATO’s Fascist History
May 7, 2022
By Tim Anderson – Apr 28, 2022

In recent years NATO—essentially the USA and Western Europe—has bared its fascist roots through multiple interventions across four continents. The NATO states backed fascist coups in Venezuela, Honduras and Bolivia, imposed blockades on dozens of nations, fomented Al-Qaeda/ISIS/Boko Haram sectarian terrorism to destabilize Libya, Iraq, Syria, and Nigeria, and are now arming open Neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

All this seems at odds with the NATO states’ heavily promoted self-image: as models of liberalism and democratic values, even lecturing other countries on that theme. They claim to have fought both fascism and communism. Yet, it was European and North American imperialism and colonialism that laid the foundation for 20th-century fascism.

Since the Second World War—a massive conflict that took more than 70 million lives—both Washington and the western Europeans made great efforts to hide the contributions and sacrifices of both the Soviet Union (principally Russia) and China, nations that lost more lives in WW2 than any other.

Indeed, in 2019 the European Parliament went so far as to blame both the USSR under Joseph Stalin, alongside Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler, as being jointly responsible for WW2. That resolution claimed that “the Second World War… was started as an immediate result of the notorious Nazi-Soviet Treaty on Non-Aggression of 23 August 1939.”

If not entirely cynical, this was an extraordinary self-deception, and the culmination of a long campaign where socialist leaders Stalin and Mao Zedong were presented, over decades, as moral equivalents of the western European fascist Adolf Hitler.

That deceit made use of false claims that Stalin and Mao had instigated famines that killed many millions. In fact, the famines in both Ukraine and China were the last in a long cycle of famines of the pre-socialist era. US historian Grover Furr has debunked the myth that the Ukrainian ‘Holodomor’ famine was a deliberate act by Stalin.

Similarly, the claim that WW2 was the “immediate result” of the Soviet-German “non-aggression pact” is an utter falsehood. There were a number of similar European agreements with Nazi Germany before this, and several were more substantial.

The Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935, for example, helped Germany rebuild its fleet, while Britain, France, and Italy conceded Berlin’s claim to part of Czechoslovakia, in the 1938 Munich Pact. Then, there were the active fascist collaborations between Germany, Spain, and Italy, including the Italian-German Pact of Steel.

Much of Europe’s fascist collaboration coalesced under an Anti-Comintern Pact created by Nazi Germany and Japan in 1936 to oppose communist states. This pact later drew in support from Italy, Hungary, Spain, and—during the war—from Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Romania, and Slovakia. Fascism was aflame across Europe in the 1930s and 1940s. Key European agreements with Nazi Germany are set out below, in Table 1.

Table 1: Key European agreements with Nazi Germany
1933, 20 July
Concordat with the Vatican
Mutual recognition and non-interference
https://www.concordatwatch.eu/reichskon ... text–k1211

1933, 25 August
Haavara agreement with German Jewish Zionists
Agreement to transfer capital and people to Palestine
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/haavara

1934, 26 January
German-Polish Non-Aggression Pact
To ensure that Poland did not sign a military alliance with France.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/blbk01.asp

1935, 18 June
Anglo-German Naval Agreement
Britain agreed to Germany expanding its navy to 35% the size of the British.
https://carolynyeager.net/anglo-german- ... ne-18-1935

1936, July
Nazi Germany aids fascists in Spain
Hitler sent air and armored units to assist General Franco.
https://spartacuseducational.com/SPgermany.htm

1936
Rome-Berlin Axis agreement
Italian – German fascist and anti-communist alliance.
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... t/axis.htm

1936, Oct-Nov
Anti-Comintern Pact
Anti-communist treaty, initiated by Nazi Germany and Japan in 1936 and which later drew in 9 European states: Italy, Hungary, Spain, Bulgaria, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, Romania and Slovakia.

1938, 30 September
Munich Pact
Britain, France, and Italy concede Germany’s Sudetenland (Czech) claims.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Munich-Agreement

1939, 22 May
Pact of Steel
Consolidates the 1936 Italian German agreement.
https://ww2db.com/battle_spec.php?battle_id=228

1939, 7 June
German–Latvian Non-Aggression Pact
Sought peace with Nazi Germany.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43211534

1939, 24 July
German–Estonian Non-Aggression Pact
Sought peace with Nazi Germany.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43211534

1939, 23 August
USSR (Molotov-Ribbentrop) Non-Aggression Pact
Sought peace with Nazi Germany, protocol defined spheres of influence.
https://universalium.en-academic.com/23 ... ssion_Pact

What is fascism?
The term is used far too frequently, but it has real meaning. We cannot be trapped by particular 20th-century histories of fascism—conceptual elements must be identified.

Fascism is a heavily militarized, anti-democratic, and racist-colonial regime that engages with a private, capitalist oligarchy. While primary fascism is an imperial project, there is also subordinate fascism in former colonies like Brazil and Chile, which integrates itself with the imperial power of the day. Fascist regimes are especially hostile to socialist and independent states and peoples. They differ from extreme right regimes only by openly crushing any semblance of social and political democracy. Imperial cultures and interventions, which always and everywhere negate the possibility of local democracy or accountability, are inherently fascist and remain at the root of contemporary fascism.

NATO’s fascism was built by the imperial and colonial history of many (but not all) of the European states, where the crushing of local communities and nations was justified by fabricated theories of race and racial superiority. The denial of this colonial-fascist history has led to suggestions that, as a Russian documentary put it, the rise of Hitler was “something atypical of European democracies; the Fuhrer’s doctrine of superior and inferior races rather appeared out of thin air in Europe due to an unlucky turn of events.”

In fact, the fascism of Nazi Germany had deep roots in European colonial history and culture. As Gerwin Strobl’s book The Germanic Isle points out, Adolf Hitler himself was a great admirer of the “ruthlessness” of the British Empire and dreamed of such achievements. For its part, the USA built myths of “liberty” while running the largest slave economy in human history. As the great Latin American resistance leader Simón Bolívar said two centuries ago, “The United States appears to be destined by Providence to plague America with misery in the name of liberty.”

Beyond the European ‘appeasement’ of Nazi Germany there was active European and North American collaboration with fascists before, during, and after WW2.

First of all the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935 helped re-arm Nazi Germany, breaking with the 1919 Versailles Treaty limits on German ships and submarines but pretending to keep the German navy a fraction of the British. Then several North American companies, notably General Motors, Ford, and IBM, invested directly in the Nazi regime’s economy, infrastructure, and military. There were many influential North American and British admirers of the Nazis. On the verge of WW2, British bankers funneled third-party (Czech) gold into the Nazi-controlled banks.

Ford assisted the Nazi war machine before and into WW2 through its motor vehicle factories in Germany and occupied Vichy France. It made use of German slave labor from Nazi concentration camps, though the company later complained that it had no control over these labor regimes. While the Ford company struggled to escape these allegations, Polish officials and former inmates named Ford as “one of 500 firms which had links with [slave labor from the Nazi death camp] Auschwitz.” IBM, a “New Deal” company close to the Roosevelt administration, also invested in Nazi Germany through the 1930s and into the early years of the war, helping build Nazi information systems.

The Swiss sold millions in arms to the Nazis, both before and during WW2. Despite pretensions of neutrality, between 1940 and 1944, “84 percent of Swiss munitions’ exports went to Axis countries.” Yet, according to researcher Bradford Snell, “General Motors was far more important to the Nazi war machine than Switzerland… GM was an integral part of the German war effort.”

North American and European investment in and collaboration with the Nazis continued well into WW2. One aspect of this was a desire to participate in what was, between 1940 and 1942, “a spectacular investment boom, primarily directed towards widening the industrial base for war.” No doubt that encouraged Ford and GM to keep collaborating with Hitler.

After 1939-40, when Nazi Germany had invaded much of western Europe, Berlin counted on the support of many European fascist and collaborationist states, as well as civilian volunteers. Alongside its alliance with fascist Italy, Nazi Germany could count on the support of fascist Spain, despite General Franco’s alleged policy of neutrality.

Then there were the pro-fascist statelets set up by the Nazis, Vichy France, and the Quisling regime in Norway. The Germans created multiple SS divisions, with tens of thousands of willing pro-fascist volunteers, in the Netherlands, Croatia, and Albania. Vichy France under WWI hero Marshall Petain enacted a racist anti-Jew law (Statut des Juifs) which made Jews second-class citizens in France and so more readily subject to Nazi predations. The fascist regime of Vidkun Quisling similarly encouraged participation in local SS divisions, helped deport Jewish people, and executed Norwegian patriots.

Danish King Christian X may have been friendly with the Jewish community, but he did not stand up to the Nazis. It is often falsely claimed that King Christian “donned the Star of David in solidarity with the Danish Jews.” This is quite false. In reality, the Danish regime opposed resistance activities and shared intelligence with the Nazis. One of the factors in this collaboration was that Denmark was “technically an ally of Germany.” Under pressure, they had signed the Anti-Comintern Pact. Despite great efforts to sanitize this history, in 2005 Danish PM Rasmussen apologized on behalf of Denmark for the extradition of minorities and resistance figures to Nazi Germany, many of whom were sent to their death.

Substantial Nazi collaboration took place in all the Baltic states: Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia all had Waffen SS divisions. They, along with ultra-nationalist Nazi collaborators in Ukraine, played a key role in local massacres of communists, Jews, and Gypsies.

Between 1941 and 1944, hundreds of thousands were slaughtered in Ukraine, many by local ultra-nationalist Nazi collaborators, like Stepan Bandera. Russian historian Lev Simkin says, “In practice, the Holocaust of the Jews began in Ukraine,” with the June 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union. The mass killings were linked to Hitler’s paranoid view of dangerous Bolshevik Jews. Mass killings of Jews in Kiev, Lvov, Kherson, and other parts of Ukraine have been well mapped out. These are some of the sites of current Russian fighting with Ukraine’s Neo-Nazis. During WW2, most of Ukraine’s pre-war Jewish population of about 1.5 million “was wiped out.”

Academic studies have shown a “massive participation of Baltic nationals in the murder of Jews in the Holocaust.” Many tens of thousands of Jews were killed in Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, much of this by local hands. There has been a strong reaction to exposure of this ugly history of fascist collaboration. Lithuania, for example, is said to want to hide its “ugly history of Nazi collaboration” by accusing Jewish partisans of war crimes.

Across Europe, there was large-scale participation in the fascist slaughter. In Hungary, Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann was said to be “reliant on the collaboration of the Hungarian authorities” to deport more than 400,000 Hungarian Jews to the death camps.

All this underlines the fact that WW2, from the European and North American sides, was not fundamentally a fight against fascism, even though those states fought a fascist Axis. The war was more of a competition between imperial blocks, with the Hitler-led coalition determined to colonize “living space” (lebensraum) in the east. The struggle of patriots in eastern Europe and Russia, as well as much of the western resistance, was certainly anti-fascist. Those leading the western states, however, were not idealists.

After WW2 the USA immediately sought to take advantage of Nazi science and technology in their subsequent Cold War against the emerging socialist bloc. The allied powers smashed anti-fascist forces in Greece and militarily occupied western Germany. The Soviet Union, for its part, ensured that it dominated those close neighbors, which had been most deeply embedded with its fascist enemies: in particular the Baltic states, Ukraine, and eastern Germany.

The US began a project of secretly recruiting Nazi scientists to its war machine. North American use of German rocket specialist Werner Von Braun is often cited with reference to the peaceful Apollo space project. However, Von Braun was an SS officer who had hand-picked slave labor from concentration camps. The US military wanted him for his rocket and missile expertise. In the secret but now notorious Operation Paperclip thousands of Nazi scientists were recruited and given safe haven in the USA, for their value in building up the US military. The Pentagon was particularly interested in the Nazi development of a “whole arsenal of nerve agents” and in Hitler’s work towards “a bubonic plague weapon.”

For all their later complaints about other states possessing weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), the US military wanted every type of WMD at its disposal. And they were prepared to use them on civilian populations, as their biological and chemical attacks in Korea and in Vietnam showed, and as the gratuitous and horrific nuclear “demonstration” attacks on the civilian Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki demonstrated. Masters of doublespeak, and with a doctrine of “plausible deniability,” US officials hide their own atrocities as much as possible.

Emerging as the dominant power after WW2 Washington, which had used fascist tactics—invasions, coups, dirty wars—to intervene in most other countries of the Americas, began to employ these same methods on other continents. So the terrible war in Korea led to a permanent US military occupation in the south of the peninsula, the democratic government of Iran was overthrown and replaced by a dictatorship in 1953 and the next terrible US anti-communist war against the people of Vietnam failed, only after millions had been slaughtered.

In the 21st century, Washington backed multiple coup attempts against Venezuela, the biggest oil producer in the Americas and historically important for fuelling the US war machine. In 2002 the USA and Spain-backed coup plotters who kidnapped elected President Hugo Chávez, falsely claimed that he had resigned, tore up the constitution, dismissed the elected National Assembly, and announced the head of the Chamber of Commerce Pedro Carmona, as president. Carmona only lasted two days, but multiple coup attempts followed. This was pure fascism. Venezuela decided that a strong state, with a large civilian militia, was necessary to defend itself from relentless US-backed fascism.

At the same time, fearing the loss of its dominant role in the world, Washington launched multiple wars in the Middle East, in futile attempts to contain the growing influence of Iran, post-Soviet Russia, and China. The wars against Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Syria, and Yemen are not the subject of this article. However we should observe the US-NATO use of massive proxy armies, al Qaeda and ISIS styled, infused with sectarian Saudi ideology, across the West Asian region and into Africa, in the shape of Boko Haram.

In Russia’s 2022 retaliatory war on Ukraine—provoked by a post-2014 war on the Russian-speaking population of eastern Ukraine and by a NATO military build-up, intended to destabilize and weaken Russia—we see a combination of the US fascist method and the older European colonial mentality. The US maintains its double-speak over “liberty,” while the Europeans speak of lesser human classes. In Ukraine, ultra-nationalists such as Azov and Right Sektor describe themselves as Nazis who want to kill Russians, Jews, and Poles. NATO and its embedded media try to hide this ugly reality.

German and European Union official Florence Gaub, for example, uses racist rhetoric to dehumanize Russian people, “Even if Russians look European, they are not European, in a cultural sense. They think differently about violence or death. They have no concept of a liberal, post-modern life, a concept of life that each individual can choose. Instead, life simply can end early with death.” Critics called this a very German reversion to the Nazi concept of Untermenschen or inferior races.

21st-century fascism has arisen in new circumstances but carries the key elements of the 20th-century project: an imperial, heavily militarized, deeply anti-democratic, and racist-colonial regime embedded in a private, capitalist oligarchy. It spawns subordinate fascism, every bit as venomous as its parent: a global imperial project which remains the key enemy of all democratic peoples.

https://orinocotribune.com/natos-fascist-history/

******************************************************

Polish "peacekeeping" mission
May 8, 10:16


Image

Polish "peacekeeping" mission

The Polish "peacekeeping mission" to Ukraine is getting closer. The facts are already on the face and it becomes more difficult to refute them. This was predicted, including by us, even at the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, and every day the evolution of the conflict into a full-scale war, in parallel with the preparation of the contingent that Warsaw will lead, makes these forecasts more and more real.

Poland is now the main stronghold of the United States in Yervop, on a par with the Baltic countries and Eastern Europe, but their scale of influence and capabilities is meager compared to Poland.

Poland desperately wanted to return to the European family of nations since 1989, but Europe initially did not really want to see Poland as part of its composition.

First, the activity of the Poles in NATO. The countries of old, Western Europe rather perceive their membership in the alliance as a heavy duty imposed by the Americans following the results of the Potsdam agreements. For the past 30 years, the Polish elites have not tired of repeating that the main guarantors of security in Europe are not Berlin or Paris, but Washington and NATO.

Secondly, Poland is too big to be divided into Euroregions conveniently managed from Brussels. The large population also gives the Poles a fairly large quota for the election of deputies to the European Parliament, and thanks to the powerful Polish army, Warsaw has gained serious influence on European affairs.

The fears were not random. After joining the European Union, Warsaw became the main Euroskeptic and hampered many processes in Brussels, in addition, it regularly tried to create integration associations within an integration association with other conservative European countries.

For many years, Old Europe strove for autonomy from the United States, the stronghold of autonomy was Paris and Berlin, which had strong leaders and tried to dictate the agenda and level the influence
of Washington by acquiring real elements of autonomy, a serious weakening of Europe happened after Merkel's resignation, in Berlin she was replaced by a weak Scholz, and Paris seized the palm of leadership with great difficulty, Macron's victory should strengthen his claims to leadership, but everything depends on the independence of his decisions.

If we sum up the role of London and Warsaw in the EU, then at first two countries under strong American influence really want to join the EU, and then they immediately begin to sabotage many integration initiatives and slow down the building of institutions.

Great Britain is a former American agent of influence in the European Union, Poland is the current one. The failed Polish Empire is an old dream and an unclosed national gestalt of the Poles, and the construction of such a bloc that could simultaneously act as a counterweight to the EU and disturb Russia at its very borders is extremely beneficial for Washington. Having received a powerful ally in the person of Britain, the Poles with a vengeance began to implement the old project of the Intermarium - an Eastern European mini-empire, uniting, if possible, all the former possessions of the Commonwealth from the Black Sea to the Baltic.

Polish "blue helmets" in Ukraine is the beginning of the construction of a quasi-empire. Everything will be beautiful and decorous, the troops will enter with the noble mission of protecting Western Ukraine from the RF Armed Forces, while Moscow will take the east and resolve the issue of the south. But the peacekeepers will not leave the West, integration processes will begin that will lead to the final dismemberment of Ukraine into several parts, with a high degree of probability, Ukraine will turn into a land country occupying the central part of the current state. Poland will get what it wants and become one of the real leaders of Europe, whose opinion will be considered on an equal footing, and imperial dreams will expand.

The United States will receive a new strong foothold right on the border of the Russian Federation, with a large army and authorities loyal to the limit. Britain will continue its favorite game "Where there is no space of freedom, it is necessary to create it, and where it is, seek to expand it."

Old Europe will rack its brains and think about how it exposed itself to the strongest blow and the loss of autonomy and leadership, turning into the front line of economic and not only economic war.

The proposal to send peacekeepers to the west of Ukraine was expressed by Polish politicians back in mid-March, but was rejected by Kyiv. After some time, the topic died out until Warsaw announced plans for military exercises, the purpose of which is to work out the reception and deployment of allied troops. There could be no clearer hint of plans.

During the exercises, the deployment of troops to specified areas of Ukraine, the creation of groupings and logistical support, which is necessary for a potential military operation, will be practiced. Russia acted in exactly the same way during the "Allied Resolve" exercises with Belarus.

We wrote about the desires and opportunities of Poland to return their historical zones of influence, a significant part of which are located in Western Ukraine, in a previous post. Whether this actually happens or remains at the level of Warsaw's political reflections will depend very much on the further development of the conflict and Moscow's actions.

The operation in Donbas still bears little resemblance to the very battle that was written about a few weeks ago. Moreover, it is clear that the forces that were withdrawn from the northern regions of Ukraine have not yet entered the battle and the attacks are going on using to a greater extent those forces that have already been involved in the east and south. In parallel with this, there is an intensified pinpoint bombardment of the rear, the RF Armed Forces have finally begun to cut serious logistics chains and finally resolve the issue of supplying fuel and lubricants to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is important from the point of view of military strategy in the framework of a real full-scale war, and not a "special operation" that ended in mid-March. In addition to the transition to a new, more balanced strategy of warfare, Moscow's steps also show a wait-and-see attitude.

Warsaw's statements against the background of the evolution of the conflict in Ukraine no longer seem like some kind of fantasy. The other day, the President of the Republic of Poland, Andrzej Duda, made a statement that can be interpreted quite meaningfully:

“For decades, and God forbid, for centuries. Ukraine is a brotherly state for Poland, and, as, I hope, Vladimir Zelensky prophetically said, there will be no more borders between our countries, Poland and Ukraine. This border will no longer exist! So that we live together on this land, building and rebuilding together our common happiness and common strength, which will allow us to repel any danger and any possible threat ”

In Poland, these statements are perceived with great enthusiasm and are associated with the possible annexation of the territories of Galicia and Volhynia by Warsaw.
We also need to add the billboards with which all of Poland is now hung:

"Time to remember history"

All these hints, together with Warsaw's extreme activity regarding the issue of creating a peacekeeping contingent and lobbying for a peacekeeping mission in NATO and the EU, indicate that Warsaw's appetites are growing and in the Ukrainian conflict, the Poles see great opportunities both to restore historical influence and to significantly increase their weight in NATO and the EU. The peacekeeping contingent, without the official aegis of NATO and the EU, is a pretext with which you can "legally" start an operation on a quasi-empire project.

They won't take Ukraine into the NATO bloc, they won't take it into the European Union either, it will be suicide for Europe. But Kyiv demands security guarantees for itself. In this vein, under the sauce of guarantees, Warsaw can begin work. Poland is actively promoting the Intermarium integration project, in which it intends to play a major role with the support of the United States. Here one involuntarily recalls the reasons for the creation of the first Commonwealth, which united two independent states in the face of an external threat.

In any case, to implement Warsaw's plans, Kyiv's approval is needed, at least in terms of a naive pretext in the form of a peacekeeping mission, and then the process will be launched and Kyiv will not be able to influence it globally.

As for the behavior of Russia in the framework of such a development of events, then of course Moscow needs to accelerate in a southerly direction and in the east and draw the boundaries of what is permitted, unless of course Moscow is really against the withdrawal of the west of Ukraine to Poland, which is not a fact.

https://t.me/togarma301/5392 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7602353.html

Colonel Baranyuk was taken prisoner
May 8, 11:26 am

Image

The commander of the 36th Separate Marine Brigade, Colonel Baranyuk, was not killed during an unsuccessful attempt to break through from the territory of the Ilyich plant.
In fact, Colonel Baranyuk was taken prisoner.
It is obvious that misinformation was launched about the death of Baranyuk while his interrogations were going on + perhaps Baranyuk himself was used to speed up the surrender of the remaining forces of the 36th brigade at the plant named after Ilyich.

One way or another, this is the first captured brigade commander since the beginning of the NWO.



Another video https://t.me/boris_rozhin/47583?single with the captured brigade commander of the 36th infantry regiment Baranyuk and his chief of staff lieutenant colonel Kormyakov, who was also captured during an unsuccessful attempt to break out from the territory of the Ilyich plant.
Valuable catch for military intelligence.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7602474.html

Banner of Victory over Ukraine. Katyusha. E.I. Demina.
May 8, 12:34

Image

Banner of Victory over Ukraine. Katyusha. E.I. Demina.

SENTRY OF THE GREAT VICTORY. ON ETERNAL POST.

"Our fallen are like sentries."

Above the liberated lands of our native Ukraine, scarlet flashes of copies of the Banner of Victory, the sacred symbol of our Motherland, soar upward everywhere. Our faith. Our life. At the beginning of the special operation, the banner of Victory fluttered on many combat vehicles liberating Ukraine. Freeing us all from the pestilence of the fascist, Bandera filth devouring the world. Now, by the will of the warriors - liberators, it is raised above the saved cities and villages.

On Cosmonautics Day, 12.04. 2022, Russian cosmonauts at the Vostochny cosmodrome asked Russian President V.V. Putin to hand over to the commander of the special operation in Ukraine a copy of the Victory Banner, which visited the ISS in 2014.

Image
Banner of Victory on the ISS.

Image
2022 year. Banner of Victory in space.

The story of this copy of the Banner of Victory is amazing and deeply symbolic.

In 2014, a deputy of the Moscow District Council Ivanov M.B. handed over to the Russian cosmonaut Artemyev O.G. several exact copies of the Banner of Victory for elevation into low Earth orbit. The deputy carried out the instructions of the participants of the Great Patriotic War: Akishina Irina Vladimirovna, Hero of the Soviet Union Ekaterina Illarionovna Demina (Mikhailova), Dudorov Ivan Vasilyevich, Zakharov Ivan Semyonovich, Leskov Yuri Vasilyevich.

Image
Ekaterina Demina.

The battalion landed on the beach. I bandaged my hand and put a tourniquet on the sailors and wrote, for example: “The tourniquet was applied on 13.15.”, so that at 14.15 this tourniquet was removed. The doctor said to the commander:
“He is a very competent paramedic. She did dressings so well on training landings. I put on a Hippocratic hat, they didn’t fly off my head.
We landed for ten days. And then they went to liberate the North Caucasus. We liberated Taganrog on August 29, 1943, Mariupol on September 9, 1943, and Osipenko on September 17, 1943. https://proza.ru/2014/11/13/1919

The world-famous, legendary Katyusha - Hero of the Soviet Union Ekaterina Illarionovna Demina (Mikhailova) - among the volunteers was enlisted as a sanitary instructor in the 369th separate battalion of the Marine Corps. With this battalion, which later received the honorary name "Kerch Red Banner", Katyusha fought for the liberation of Donbass, Taganrog, Mariupol, Crimea, Odessa, Transnistria, fought through the waters and shores of the Caucasus and Crimea, the Azov and Black Seas, the Dniester and the Danube, from liberation mission - through the land of Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia and Austria.


Recorded in 2013 with a performance by Ekaterina Demina.

Ekaterina Demina died in 2019. I wrote about her battle path here https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/5098816.html

Also, the order to transfer the banner was given by:

Irina Vladimirovna Akishina, radio operator, sailor of the Baltic Fleet. Since 1942, she fought in the Redoubt 63 detachment near Leningrad. With battles passed the Baltic states. Liberated Riga, Tallinn, Koenigsberg.

Ivan Vasilyevich Dudorov (b. 1926) former cabin boy of the first set of the Solovetsky junior school, sworn in 1942. midshipman. He participated in combat operations as part of the fighter squadron of the "Sea Hunters" of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet. Lives to this day.

Ivan Semenovich Zakharov, a member of the partisan movement in 1941 in the Kaluga region. After the defeat of the Germans near Moscow, he was enlisted in the 61st Army. With this army, he passed from the city of Volkhov, Oryol region, liberating Belarus. Brest. Poland. Warsaw and the war ended on the Elbe.

Yuri Vasilyevich Leskov, sergeant, infantryman, participant in the Battle of Oryol-Kursk. With a leg cut off by a mine, he continued to throw grenades at the Germans. He was awarded the Order of the Red Banner, two Orders of the Red Star, the Order of the Patriotic War of the 1st degree, two Orders of the Patriotic War of the 2nd degree and many medals.

Image

The whole world should know that the Banner of Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War, consecrated by the Soviet Victors and having been in space, will overshadow the sacred battle against fascism in Ukraine.

And not only.

(c) Ivanov M.B.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7602833.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Mon May 09, 2022 1:21 pm

Russian US Ambassador: We Will Not Allow Resurgence of Nazism

Image
Russian ambassador to Washington Anatoly Antonov: Russia will not allow the resurgence of Nazism and attempts to mock the legacy of the victorious soldiers. | Photo: Twitter @BRASIL_ACABOU

Published 8 May 2022

The statement comes after U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield made disparaging remarks about Victory Day celebrations in Russia on Sunday, claiming that Russians “have nothing to celebrate” on May 9.

Russia will not allow Nazism to resurface and will push back against attempts to ridicule the legacy of the soldiers that defeated it, Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov said on Sunday.

"Our holy duty is to preserve the truth about the victory [over Nazi Germany]. We will not allow to cross out the great pages of the past, [and] will not allow a resurgence of Nazism," Antonov said during the Immortal Regiment online conference.

"Attempts to ridicule the heroic legacy of our ancestors will definitely meet a staunch resistance," Antonov stressed.

The statement follows a declaration by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield, who made disparaging remarks about Victory Day celebrations in Russia on Sunday, claiming that Russians “have nothing to celebrate” on May 9.

This is not the first time senior U.S. officials verbally attack Victory Day, one of the most important national holidays in Russia commemorating the defeat of Nazism and end of World War 2.

On Saturday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said that Russian President Vladimir Putin is allegedly trying to “manipulate historical memory” to make a case for Russia's special military operation in Ukraine.


In February, the Russian ambassador warned that there is a self-evident desire to erase the memory of the deeds of the Soviet soldiers as politicians in many Western countries are trying to put on an equal footing with Nazi-Fascist executioners.

Antonov expressed particular concern that some Eastern European countries host regular marches to honor SS divisions in an attempt to erase from the collective memory their crimes against humanity. The ambassador also found disturbing that similar trends affect the U.S. as well.


On May 8, 1945, Nazi Germany's Wehrmacht commanders signed the instrument of surrender, admitting defeat in World War 2. This day is celebrated in many countries and referred to as Victory Day. Almost 27 million Soviet citizens lost their lives on the fronts, in German prisons, starved to death and were bombed, died in ghettos and furnaces of the Nazi death camps.

President Putin stressed last year that the Soviet Union accounted for about 75 percent of all military efforts undertaken by the anti-Hitler coalition.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0007.html

*******************************************

Image

Mariupol – Ukrainian soldiers surrounded in Azovstal reveal their faces as terrorists and hostage-takers
Originally published: Donbass-Insider on May 6, 2022 by Christelle Néant (more by Donbass-Insider) (Posted May 09, 2022)

After shelling the new firing positions that Ukrainian soldiers had set up in Azovstal during the evacuation of civilians held in the factory, the Russian army organized a new ceasefire and new humanitarian corridors over three days to continue the evacuation. But instead of letting out the civilians still in the Azovstal basement, the Ukrainian soldiers revealed their true face as terrorists and hostage-takers.

After three days of successful evacuation of civilians held in Azovstal by Ukrainian soldiers, the Russian army had to interrupt the evacuation to shell the factory in order to eliminate the firing positions that the latter had set up thanks to the ceasefire.

The shelling lasted two days and after ensuring that the firing positions were destroyed, the Russian army announced again that a ceasefire and humanitarian corridors would be re-established on 5, 6 and 7 May to continue the evacuation of civilians still present in the Azovstal basements.

Except that instead of letting the remaining civilians out of the basement of the Azovstal factory, the Ukrainian soldiers demanded to exchange them at the rate of 15 civilians for a ton of food and medicine.

“We have to maintain contacts with the Azov Nazis who have settled there and the SBU representatives in the interest of saving the civilians who have stayed there. During the negotiations, they offered us to exchange civilian hostages–15 for a ton of food and medicine–and warned that no one else will be allowed to go to Ukraine, from now on they will only be exchanged,” said a representative of the factory liberation operation headquarters.

According to this source, more than 200 civilians may still be in the Azovstal basements, including women, children and the elderly. This demand to exchange civilians for food and medicine “by weight” is viciously reminiscent of the Islamic State terrorists’ method in Syria.

Above all, it reveals the true face of the Ukrainian soldiers holed up in the Azovstal factory: hostage-taking terrorists. Not only are they using these civilians as human shields, but now they are trading them for food and medicine! This is the true face of the pseudo Ukrainian heroes, and the pseudo defenders of Marioupol. In reality they don’t give a damn about the civilians they claim to defend!

The demands of the Ukrainian soldiers of the neo-Nazi Azov regiment made the spokesman of the Russian Duma, Vyacheslav Volodin, react. He stressed that their demands revealed their true face, which is the reason why Russia decided to intervene in Ukraine.

“It has been reported that the Azovstal fighters have offered to exchange the civilians present for food and medicine. […] After such statements, is there anyone who doesn’t know who is fighting our soldiers and officers in Ukraine? Think about it, first they lured people to the factory, then they hid behind them like a human shield, and now they want to trade them for food, estimating human life at 66.6 kg. They have only one goal: to save their own skin. The only thing worse than cannibalism is eating the hostages. Typical terrorist behavior. What will those who defended these monsters say now? This is a clear example of what Nazis are and why they must be dealt with,” he said on his Telegram channel.

These despicable demands confirm the testimonies of the civilians who came out of Azovstal, who stated that they were held in the basements against their will, and definitively prove that the civilians are only human shields and hostages for the Ukrainian soldiers of the neo-Nazi Azov regiment, who are in reality only terrorists. Above all, these demands confirm the rightness of the Russian intervention in Ukraine, and justify Russia’s intransigence towards these Ukrainian neo-Nazi units.

https://mronline.org/2022/05/09/mariupo ... ge-takers/

*********************************************

Putin says operation in Ukraine was "preventive" response to imminent aggression

Image
Putin assured that the Russian troops and the militias of Donbas are fighting "for their future, because nobody forgets the lessons of the Second World War." | Photo: EFE
Published May 9, 2022 (2 hours 23 minutes ago)

"It was a forced, timely and the only correct decision, the decision of a sovereign, independent and strong nation," he said.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said Monday that the special military operation in Ukraine, which began on February 24, was a "preventive" response to an imminent aggression by the kyiv government.

"We had witnessed the deployment of war infrastructure, the incipient work of hundreds of foreign advisers and the regular supplies of NATO's most modern weapons. The danger was increasing day by day," Putin said in his speech to commemorate the 77th anniversary. of Victory Day.

"Russia repelled the aggression in a preventive manner, it was a forced, timely and the only correct decision, the decision of a sovereign, independent and strong nation," said the head of state.



At the request of the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, Putin began a special operation on February 24 with the aim of demilitarizing and denazifying Ukraine, which, he clarified, has not targeted the civilian population.

The southern president revealed that the member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) did not attend to various initiatives of his government.

"Another punitive operation was being prepared in Donbas (in eastern Ukraine), an invasion of our historical lands, including Crimea," the Russian leader said.

He stressed that the Russian troops and the Donbas militias are "fighting for the Homeland, for its future, because no one forgets the lessons of World War II and there is no room in the world for executioners, tortured and Nazis."

"The death of each soldier is a pain for all of us. Let's do everything possible to help the families and children of the fallen soldiers in Ukraine," Putin said, announcing that a presidential decree was signed on this day to this effect.

Putin presided over a minute of silence in tribute to the fallen, after which the traditional troop parade began, commemorating the victory of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) against Nazi Germany in 1945.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-pu ... -0006.html

Russia destroys Ukrainian helicopters near Odessa

Image
Russia's Bastion mobile coastal defense system fired cruise missiles at a group of helicopters at an airfield in the Odessa region. | Photo: ria.ru
Published May 9, 2022 (38 minutes ago)

In the night, the forces of the self-styled Republic of Lughansk liberated the town of Nizhne, near Lisichansk.

Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov reported Monday that Russian forces shot down a group of helicopters with Onyx cruise missiles at an airfield in the Odessa region of southwestern Ukraine.

Also on Sunday, three unmanned aerial vehicles, including two Bayraktar-TB2s, were shot down near Zmeiny Island, the official said.

According to the Russian colonel-general, high-precision aerial missiles destroyed two command posts, a Ukrainian battery of Grad multiple rocket launchers near Popasnaya, 18 assembly areas of military personnel and equipment near Lisichansk, a radio detection station US-made counterbattery near Zolotoye.


The operational-tactical and army aviation neutralized 52 areas of concentration of military personnel and equipment, as well as an ammunition depot near Glukhov.

Similarly, missile troops and artillery units destroyed eight command posts, 26 artillery units at their firing positions, and 211 assembly areas for military personnel and equipment.

During the day of the Russian special military operation in Ukraine, 350 Ukrainian nationalists were killed and 56 units of military equipment were neutralized. In addition, 4 Ukrainian Smerch multiple rocket launchers, a launch ramp of the Bogodukhov S-300 air defense system were shelled.


So far, 160 planes and 118 helicopters have been neutralized, along with 783 unmanned aerial vehicles, 299 anti-aircraft missile systems, 2,949 tanks and other armored fighting vehicles.

In the military operation, Russian forces have killed 342 multiple launch rocket systems, 1,423 field artillery and mortars, in addition to 2,769 units of Ukrainian special military vehicles.


https://www.telesurtv.net/news/rusia-de ... -0009.html

Google Translator

***********************************

Image
https://mronline.org/wp-content/uploads ... 8_2014.jpg

Russia and the Ukraine crisis: The Eurasian Project in conflict with the triad imperialist policies
Posted May 07, 2022 by Samir Amin

We wanted to draw readers attention to this piece by Samir Amin, which was written at the time of the Maidan Coup in 2014. —Eds.

1. The current global stage is dominated by the attempt of historical centers of imperialism (the U.S., Western and Central Europe, Japan—hereafter called “the Triad”) to maintain their exclusive control over the planet through a combination of:

so-called neo-liberal economic globalization policies allowing financial transnational capital of the Triad to decide alone on all issues in their exclusive interests;
the military control of the planet by the U.S. and its subordinate allies (NATO and Japan) in order to annihilate any attempt by any country not of the Triad to move out from under their yoke.
In that respect all countries of the world not of the Triad are enemies or potential enemies, except those who accept complete submission to the economic and political strategy of the Triad—such as the two new “democratic republics” of Saudi Arabia and Qatar! The so-called “international community” to which the Western medias refer continuously is indeed reduced to the G7 plus Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Any other country, even when its government is currently aligned with the Triad, is a potential enemy since the peoples of those countries may reject that submission.

2. In that frame Russia is “an enemy.”

Whatever might be our assessment of what the Soviet Union was (“socialist” or something else), the Triad fought it simply because it was an attempt to develop independently of dominant capitalism/imperialism.

After the breakdown of the Soviet system, some people (in Russia in particular) thought that the “West” would not antagonize a “capitalist Russia”—just as Germany and Japan had “lost the war but won the peace.” They forgot that the Western powers supported the reconstruction of the former fascist countries precisely to face the challenge of the independent policies of the Soviet Union. Now, this challenge having disappeared, the target of the Triad is complete submission, to destroy the capacity of Russia to resist.

3. The current development of the Ukraine tragedy illustrates the reality of the strategic target of the Triad.

The Triad organized in Kiev what ought to be called a “Euro/Nazi putsch.” To achieve their target (separating the historical twin sister nations—the Russian and the Ukrainian), they needed the support of local Nazis.

The rhetoric of the Western medias, claiming that the policies of the Triad aim at promoting democracy, is simply a lie. Nowhere has the Triad promoted democracy. On the contrary these policies have systematically been supporting the most anti-democratic (in some cases “fascist”) local forces. Quasi-fascist in the former Yugoslavia—in Croatia and Kosovo—as well as in the Baltic states and Eastern Europe, Hungary for instance. Eastern Europe has been “integrated” in the European Union not as equal partners, but as “semi-colonies” of major Western and Central European capitalist/imperialist powers. The relation between West and East in the European system is in some degree similar to that which rules the relations between the U.S. and Latin America! In the countries of the South the Triad supported the extreme anti-democratic forces such as, for instance, ultra-reactionary political Islam and, with their complicity, has destroyed societies; the cases of Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya illustrate these targets of the Triad imperialist project.

4. Therefore the policy of Russia (as developed by the administration of Putin) to resist the project of colonization of Ukraine (and of other countries of the former Soviet Union, in Transcaucasia and Central Asia) must be supported. The Baltic states’ experience should not be repeated. The target of constructing a “Eurasian” community, independent from the Triad and its subordinate European partners, is also to be supported.

But this positive Russian “international policy” is bound to fail if it is not supported by the Russian people. And this support cannot be won on the exclusive basis of “nationalism,” even a positive progressive—not chauvinistic—brand of “nationalism,” a fortiori not by a “chauvinistic” Russian rhetoric. Fascism in Ukraine cannot be challenged by Russian fascism. The support can be won only if the internal economic and social policy pursued promotes the interests of the majority of the working people.

What do I mean by a “people-oriented” policy favoring the working classes?

Do I mean “socialism,” or even a nostalgia of the Soviet system? This is not the place to re-assess the Soviet experience, in a few lines! I shall only summarize my views in a few sentences. The authentic Russian socialist revolution produced a state socialism which was the only possible first step toward socialism; after Stalin that state socialism moved towards becoming state capitalism (explaining the difference between the two concepts is important but not the subject of this short paper). As of 1991 state capitalism was dismantled and replaced by “normal” capitalism based on private property, which, as in all countries of contemporary capitalism, is basically the property of financial monopolies, owned by the oligarchy (similar to, not different from, the oligarchies running capitalism in the Triad), many coming out of the former nomenklatura, and some newcomers.

The explosion of creative authentic democratic practices initiated by the Russian (October) revolution was subsequently tamed and replaced by an autocratic pattern of management of society, albeit granting social rights to the working classes. This system led to massive depoliticization and was not protected from despotic and even criminal deviations. The new pattern of savage capitalism is based on the continuation of depoliticization and the non-respect of democratic rights.

Such a system rules not only Russia, but all the other former Soviet republics. Differences relate to the practice of the so-called “Western” electoral democracy, more effective in Ukraine, for instance, than in Russia. Nonetheless this pattern of rule is not “democracy” but a farce compared to bourgeois democracy as it functioned at previous stages of capitalist development, including in the “traditional democracies” of the West, since real power is now restricted to the rule of monopolies and operates to their exclusive benefit.

A people-oriented policy implies therefore moving away, as much as possible, from the “liberal” recipe and the electoral masquerade associated with it, which claims to give legitimacy to regressive social policies. I would suggest setting up in its place a brand of new state capitalism with a social dimension (I say social, not socialist). That system would open the road to eventual advances toward a socialization of the management of the economy and therefore authentic new advances toward an invention of democracy responding to the challenges of a modern economy.

It is only if Russia moves along such lines that the current conflict between, on the one hand, the intended independent international policy of Moscow and, on the other hand, the pursuit of a reactionary social internal policy can be given a positive outcome. Such a move is needed and possible: fragments of the political ruling class could align on such a program if popular mobilization and action promote it. To the extent that similar advances are also carried out in Ukraine, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia, an authentic community of Eurasian nations can be established and become a powerful actor in the reconstruction of the world system.

5. Russian state power remaining within the strict limits of the neo-liberal recipe annihilates the chances of success of an independent foreign policy and the chances of Russia becoming a really emerging country acting as an important international actor.

Neo-liberalism can produce for Russia only a tragic economic and social regression, a pattern of “lumpen development” and a growing subordinate status in the global imperialist order. Russia would provide to the Triad oil, gas, and some other natural resources; its industries would be reduced to the status of sub-contracting for the benefit of Western financial monopolies.

In such a position, which is not very far from that of Russia today in the global system, attempts to act independently in the international area will remain extremely fragile, threatened by “sanctions” which will strengthen the disastrous alignment of the ruling economic oligarchy to the demands of dominant monopolies of the Triad. The current outflow of “Russian capital” associated with the Ukraine crisis illustrates the danger. Re-establishing state control over the movements of capital is the only effective response to that danger.

—Moscow, March 2014

Further Readings:

*Amin, Samir. The Implosion of Contemporary Capitalism. London and NY: Pluto and Monthly Review Press, 2013.
*Amin, Samir. “What ‘Radical’ Means in the 21st Century.” Review of Radical Political Economics 45.3 (September 2013).
*Amin, Samir. “The Democratic Fraud and the Universalist Alternative.” Monthly Review 63.5 (October 2011).
*Amin, Samir. “Unity and Diversity in the Movement to Socialism.” Monthly Review (forthcoming in the June 2014 issue).
*Amin, Samir. “Russia in the Global System.” Translated from Arabic into Russian by Said Gafourov.

https://mronline.org/2022/05/07/russia- ... -policies/

*****************************************

Zelensky and the SS division "Totenkopf"
May 9, 15:33

Image

Zelensky's gang decided to congratulate Ukraine on May 9 with a photograph of a Ukrainian Nazi with the chevron of the SS division "Dead Head".
When they saw the reaction, including in Ukraine, they hastily began to delete it from everywhere, but the photo was already stolen from Zelensky’s account by reposts and it was not possible to clean up the traces of another “there is no Nazism in Ukraine”.

An extra reminder for May 9 on the topic of who we are fighting in Ukraine.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7604674.html

Mobilization and war were never declared
May 9, 11:38

Image

Despite weeks of statements that Russia will declare war on May 9, declare mobilization, stop the war, etc. by May 9, in fact:

1. No mobilization was declared.
2. War was not declared.
3. The war did not stop.
4. Linking the speed of onset to dates was abandoned even earlier.

As a result, the Western and Ukrainian media fed the audience with information manure from a shovel for several weeks.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7603782.html

Organize according to the Russian model
May 9, 13:22

Image

The head of the military-civilian administration of the Kherson region stated that:

1. There are no plans to unite the Kherson region with the Crimea.
2. The device of the Kherson region will be organized according to the Russian model.
3. Discrimination against the Russian language will be eliminated.
4. In the Kherson region, pensions are already being paid in rubles (since the beginning of May, the Kherson region has entered the ruble zone).

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7604019.html

Google Translator

**********************************************

Michael Brenner on the High Risks of Cultivated Ignorance
by EDITOR
May 8, 2022

Micheal Brenner challenges the mainstream narrative of Putin and appends four of his public speeches.

Image

Our political elites evidently have absorbed fully and deeply the proposition that “ignorance is bliss.” The exhibits are too numerous to inventory. A singular current example with profound implication is the notion that Vladimir Putin is the quintessential brutal dictator – power mad, ruthless and with only a tenuous grip on reality. Indeed, it has become commonplace to equate him with Hitler – as done by such leading lights of America’s stellar elites such as Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi – as well as ‘opinion makers’ galore. Even 203 noble Nobels lend their collective brains and celebrity credentials to an ‘open letter’ whose first sentence pairs Russia’s attack on Ukraine with Hitler’s assault on Poland in September 1939. These are only the most striking examples of the shortfalls in what passes for general education after 16 years of obligatory residence in American classrooms.

These words are not meant as a defense brief for Putin or Russia’s actions in Ukraine. That is a separate matter. The intent is simply to point out the high risks of making security policy on portentous matters in cultivated ignorance. Sadly, the argument that those who make those decisions should know literally what they are talking about is widely deemed as radical – itself as great a menace as whatever dragons are hovering around us. In Putin’s case, there is absolutely no excuse. He has presented his views on how Russia visualizes its place in the world, relations with the West and the contours/rules of a desired international system more comprehensively, historically informed, and coherently than has any national leader I know of. Shouted declarations “we’re number ONE and always will be” are not his style. The point is that you may be troubled by his conclusions, question his sincerity, suspect hidden strains of thought and character, or denounce certain actions. However, doing so has no credibility unless one has engaged the man based on what is available – not on cartoon sketches. So, too, should we recognize that this is not a one-man show. that it behooves us to consider the more complex reality that is Russian governance and politics.

For that reason, I have appended 4 of Putin’s lengthy public speeches for your attention. Also, a long interview/memoir by Jack Matlock – the United States’ ambassador to Moscow during the crucial years that saw and end to Cold War I. If you are inclined to scan them, your knowledge of the subject already would exceed that of Pelosi, HRC, Biden, Blinken and even Michael McFaul whose atrociously accented, fractured spoken Russian suggests that were he to as much as fix his eye on the Putin manuscripts, he’d struggle through a few paragraphs before intoning that that there is an unmistakable echo of Mein Kempf. And if you are acquainted with any of the 203 noble Nobels you might consider passing on to them the speeches so as to remind them that dedication to intellectual integrity is meant to be universally applied.

Vladimir Putin is a formidable personality who leads a great country that has been experiencing an historic transformation. We will have to deal with him and with it, one way or another. Simply shouting to the skies: “genocidal killer” is dangerous, counter-productive – and, frankly, childish.

Putin’s Speeches in translation:

Putin’s Opening Speech At Davos World Economic Forum 2009 https://windowstorussia.com/from-russia ... ch-at.html

Address by President of the Russian Federation 2014 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603

Russian President Putin’s Speech At The World Economic Forum 2021 https://www.russia-briefing.com/news/ru ... tion.html/

The Ambassadorial Series: Deans of U.S.-Russia Diplomacy Transcript of the Ambassador Jack F. Matlock Interview https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/2738 ... -interview

https://scheerpost.com/2022/05/08/micha ... -ignorance

**********************************************

Poland poised to intervene militarily in Ukraine
VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 7 MAY 2022

Image

While a recent poll shows that 56.8% of Poles is favourable to the deployment of Polish peacekeeping troops in Ukraine, under the command of NATO, the UN or the EU, President Andrzej Duda said:

"Between our countries – Poland and Ukraine – there will be no more borders. This border will not exist! So that we live together on this earth, building and restoring together our common happiness and common strength, which will allow us to repel any danger or any possible threat.”

https://www.voltairenet.org/article216771.html

Gotta ask, "WWBD?" (What would Bandera do?) Well we might guess what the butcher who murdered 20,000 Poles at the onset of the Nazi invasion east...And it would be very ugly.

Seems like the Poles vie with the Kurds for "Worst Politicians in the Universe'. Consistently wrong about everything, a degree of denial of true history to make even Washington blush.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Mon May 09, 2022 2:59 pm

Return of the King
WOLFGANG STREECK
04 MAY 2022

If there ever was a question of who is boss in Europe, NATO or the European Union, the war in Ukraine has settled it, at least for the foreseeable future. Once upon a time, Henry Kissinger complained that there was no single phone number on which to call Europe, far too many calls to make to get something done, a far too inconvenient chain of command in need of simplification. Then, after the end of Franco and Salazar, came the southern extension of the EU, with Spain joining NATO in 1982 (Portugal had been a member since 1949), reassuring Kissinger and the United States against both Eurocommunism and a military takeover other than by NATO. Later, in the emerging New World Order after 1990, it was for the EU to absorb most of the member states of the defunct Warsaw Pact, as they were fast-tracked for NATO membership. Stabilizing the new kids on the capitalist block economically and politically, and guiding their nation-building and state-formation, the task of the EU, more or less eagerly accepted, would be to enable them to become part of ‘the West’, as led by the United States in a now unipolar world.

In subsequent years the number of East European countries waiting to be admitted to the EU increased, with the United States lobbying for their admission. With time Albania, North Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia achieved official candidate status, while Kosovo, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Moldova are still kept waiting further down the line. Meanwhile enthusiasm among EU member states for enlargement declined, especially in France which preferred and prefers ‘deepening’ over ‘widening’. This was in line with the peculiar French finalité of the ‘ever closer union of the peoples of Europe’: a politically and socially relatively homogeneous compound of states capable collectively of playing an independent, self-determined, ‘sovereign’, above all French-led role in world politics (‘a more independent France in a stronger Europe’, as the just reelected French president likes to put it).

The economic costs of bringing new member states up to European standards, and the required amount of institution-building from the outside, had to be kept manageable, given that the EU was already struggling with persistent economic disparities between its Mediterranean and Northwestern member countries, not to mention the deep attachment of some of the new members in the East to the United States. So, France blocked the entry into the EU of Turkey, a long-standing NATO member (which it will remain even though it has just sent the activist Osman Kavala to prison, for a lifetime in solitary confinement with no possibility of parole). The same holds for several states on the West Balkans, like Albania and North Macedonia, having failed to prevent the accession, in the first wave of Osterweiterung in 2004, of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia and Hungary. Four years later, Sarkozy and Merkel barred (for the time being) the United States under George Bush the Younger from admitting Georgia and Ukraine into NATO, anticipating that this would have to be followed by their inclusion in the European Union.

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine the game changed. Zelensky’s televised address to the assembled heads of EU governments caused a kind of excitement that is much desired but rarely experienced in Brussels, and his demand for full EU membership, tutto e subito, drew unending applause. Overzealous as usual, von der Leyen traveled to Kyiv to hand Zelensky the long questionnaire required to start admission procedures. While normally it takes national governments months if not years to assemble the complex details the questionnaire asks for, Zelensky, Kyiv’s state of siege notwithstanding, promised to finish the job in a matter of weeks, and so he did. It is not yet known what the answers are on questions like the treatment of ethnic and linguistic minorities, above all Russian, or the extent of corruption and the state of democracy, for example the role of the national oligarchs in political parties and in parliament.

If Ukraine is admitted as swiftly as promised, and as its government and that of the United States expect, there will be no longer be any reason to refuse membership not just to the states of the West Balkans but also to Georgia and Moldova, which applied together with Ukraine. In any case, they will all add strength to the anti-Russian-cum-pro-American wing inside the EU, today led by Poland, at the time like Ukraine an eager participant in the ‘coalition of the willing’ assembled by the United States for the purpose of active nation-building in Iraq. As to the EU generally, Ukrainian accession will turn it into even more of a prep school or a holding pen for future NATO members. This is true even if, as part of a potential war settlement, Ukraine may have to be officially declared neutral, preventing it from joining NATO directly. (In fact, since 2014 the Ukrainian army has been rebuilt from scratch under American direction, to the point where in 2021 it effectively achieved what is called ‘interoperability’ in NATO jargon).

In addition to domesticating neophyte members, another job that has come with the EU’s new status as a civil auxiliary of NATO is to devise economic sanctions that hurt the Russian enemy while sparing friends and allies, as much as necessary. NATO controlling the guns, the EU is charged with controlling the ports. Von der Leyen, enthusiastic as always, had let the world know by the end of February that sanctions made in EU would be the most effective ever and would ‘bit by bit, wipe out Russia’s industrial base’ (Stück für Stück die industrielle Basis Russlands abtragen). Perhaps as a German, she had in mind something like a Morgenthau Plan, as proposed by advisers to Franklin D. Roosevelt, in order to reduce defeated Germany to an agricultural society forever. That project was soon dropped, at the latest when the United States realized that they might need (West) Germany for its Cold War ‘containment’ of the Soviet Union.

It is not clear who told von der Leyen not to overdo it, but the abtragen metaphor was not heard again, perhaps because what it implied might have amounted to active participation in the war. In any case, it soon turned out that the Commission, its claims to technocratic fame notwithstanding, failed as badly in planning sanctions as it had in planning macro-economic convergence. In remarkably Eurocentric fashion, the Commission seemed to have forgotten that there are parts of the world that see no reason to join a Western-imposed boycott of Russia; for them, military interventions are nothing unusual, including interventions by the West for the West. Moreover, internally, as push came to shove, the EU found it hard to order its member states what not to buy or sell; calls for Germany and Italy to immediately stop importing Russian gas were ignored, with both governments insisting that national jobs and national prosperity be taken into consideration. Miscalculations abounded even in the financial sphere where, in spite of ever-so-sophisticated sanctions against Russian banks, including Moscow’s central bank, the ruble has recently even risen, by roughly 30 percent between April 6 and April 30.

When kings return, they initiate a purge, to rectify the anomalies that have accumulated during their absence. Old bills are presented anew and collected, lack of loyalty revealed during the King’s absence is punished, disobedient ideas and improper memories are extirpated, and the nooks and crannies of the body politic are cleansed of the political deviants that have in the meantime populated them. Symbolic action of the McCarthy type is helpful as it spreads fear among potential dissenters. Throughout the West today, players of piano or tennis or relativity theory who happen to be from Russia and want to continue playing whatever they play are pressed to make public statements that would make their lives and those of their families back home difficult at best. Investigative journalists discover an abyss of philanthropic donations by Russian oligarchs to music and other festivals, donations that have been welcome in the past but are now found to subvert artistic freedom, unlike of course the philanthropic donations of their Western fellow-oligarchs. Etc.

Against the background of proliferating loyalty oaths, public discourse is reduced to spreading the King’s truth, and nothing but. Putin verstehen – trying to find out about motives and reasons, searching for a clue as to how one might, perhaps, negotiate an end to the bloodshed – is equated with Putin verzeihen, or forgiving; it ‘relativizes’, as the Germans put it, the atrocities of the Russian army by trying to end them with other than military means. According to newly received wisdom, there is only one way of dealing with a madman; thinking about other ways advances his interests and therefore amounts to treason. (I remember teachers in the 1950s who let it be known to the young generation that ‘the only language the Russian understands is the language of the fist’.) Memory management is central: never mention the Minsk Accords (2014 and 2015) between Ukraine, Russia, France and Germany, don’t ask what became of them and why, never mind the platform of negotiated conflict settlement on which Zelensky was elected in 2019 by almost three quarters of Ukrainian voters, and forget the American response by megaphone diplomacy to Russian proposals as late as 2022 for a joint European security system. Above all, never bring up the various American ‘special operations’ of the recent past, like for example in Iraq, and in Fallujah inside Iraq (800 civilian casualties alone in a few days); doing so commits the crime of ‘whataboutism’, which in view of ‘the pictures from Bucha and Mariupol’ is morally out of bounds.

Throughout the West, the politics of imperial reconstruction is targeting anything and anybody found to deviate, or to have deviated in the past, from the American position on Russia and the Soviet Union and on Europe as a whole. It is here that the line is drawn today between Western society and its enemies, between good and evil, a line along which not just the present but also the past needs to be purged. Particular attention is being paid to Germany, the country that has been under American (Kissingerian) suspicion since Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik and the German recognition of the postwar Western border of Poland. Since then, Germany has been suspect in American eyes of wanting to have a voice on national and European security, for the time being within NATO and the European Community, but in the future possibly on its own.

That three decades later Schröder, like Blair, Obama and so many others, monetized his political past after leaving office was as such never a problem. This was different with Schröder’s historical refusal, together with Chirac, to join the American-led posse invading Iraq and, in the act, breach exactly the same international law that is now being breached by Putin. (That Merkel as opposition leader at the time told the world, speaking from Washington DC a few days before the invasion, that Schröder did not represent the true will of the German people may be one of the reasons why she has up to now been spared American attacks for what is claimed to be a major cause of the Ukrainian war, her energy policy having made Germany dependent on Russian natural gas.)

Today, in any case, it is not really Schröder, all-too-obviously inebriated by the millions with which the Russian oligarchs are filling him up, who is the main target of the German purge. Instead it is the SPD as a party – which, according to BILD and the new CDU leader, Friedrich Merz, a businessman with excellent American connections, has always had a Russlandproblem. The role of Grand Inquisitor is robustly performed by the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany, one Andrij Melnyk, self-appointed nemesis in particular of Frank-Walter Steinmeier, now president of the Federal Republic, who is singled out to personify the SPD’s ‘Russian connection’. Steinmeier was from 1999 to 2005 Schröder’s Chief of Staff at the Chancellor’s Office, served two times (2005-2009 and 2013-2017) as Foreign Minister under Merkel, and was for four years (2009-2013) Bundestag opposition leader.

According to Melnyk, an indefatigable twitterer and interview-giver, Steinmeier ‘has for years woven a spider web of contacts with Russia’, one in which ‘many people are entangled who are now calling the shots in the German government’. For Steinmeier, according to Melnyk, ‘the relationship to Russia was and is something fundamental, something sacred, regardless of what happens. Even Russia’s war of aggression doesn’t matter much to him.’ Thus informed, the Ukrainian government declared Steinmeier persona non grata at the last minute, just as he was about to board a train from Warsaw to Kyiv, in the company of the Polish foreign minister and the heads of government of the Baltic states. While the others were allowed to enter Ukraine, Steinmeier had to inform the accompanying journalists that he was not welcome, and return to Germany.

The case of Steinmeier is interesting as it shows how the targets of the purge are being selected. At first glance Steinmeier’s neoliberal-cum-Atlanticist credentials would seem impeccable. Author of Agenda 2010, as head of the Chancellery and coordinator of the German secret services, he allowed the United States to use their German military bases to collect and interrogate prisoners taken from all over the world during the ‘war on terror’ – one can assume in compensation for Schröder’s refusal to join the American adventure in Iraq. He also didn’t make much of a fuss, indeed no fuss at all, when the United States held German citizens of Lebanese and Turkish descent prisoner in Guantanamo, each of whom was arrested, abducted and tortured after being mistaken for somebody else. Accusations that he failed to provide assistance, as he should have done under German law, have followed him to this day.

What is true is that Steinmeier helped make Germany dependent on Russian energy, although not quite as charged. It was he who, in 1999, negotiated the German exit from nuclear energy, on behalf of the Red-Green government under Schröder and as demanded, not by the SPD, but by the Greens. Later, as opposition leader, he went along when, after the Fukushima disaster in 2011, Merkel, having reversed nuclear exit I, now reversed again to push through nuclear exit II, ever so cunningly hoping that this would open the door to a coalition with the Greens. A few years later, when she for the same reason ended coal, in particular soft coal, to become effective at about the time of the shutdown of the last remaining nuclear reactors, Steinmeier went along as well. Still, it is he, not Merkel, who is being blamed for German energy dependence on and collaboration with Russia, perhaps out of lasting American gratitude for Merkel’s assistance in the Syrian refugee crisis following the botched American (half-)intervention in Syria. Meanwhile the Greens, the driving force behind German energy policy since Schröder, like the CDU manage to escape American wrath by pivoting to attack the SPD and Scholz for hesitating to deliver ‘heavy weapons’ to Ukraine.

And Nord Stream 2? Here too, Merkel was always in the driver’s seat, not least because the German end of the pipeline was to be in her home state, even her constituency. Note that the pipeline never went into operation, a good deal of the Russian gas that goes to Germany being pumped through a pipeline system that runs in part through Ukraine. What made Nord Stream 2 necessary, in Merkel’s eyes, was the chaotic legal and political situation in Ukraine after 2014, raising the question of how to secure a reliable transit of gas for Germany and Western Europe – a question that Nord Stream 2 would elegantly solve. One doesn’t have to be an Ukraineversteher to understand that this must have annoyed the Ukrainians. It is interesting to note that after more than two months of war Russian gas is still being delivered through Ukrainian pipelines. While the Ukrainian government could shut these down any moment, it does not do so, probably to enable itself and associated oligarchs to continue collecting transit fees. This does not keep Ukraine from demanding that Germany and other countries end their use of Russian gas immediately, in order to no longer finance ‘Putin’s war’.

Again, why Steinmeier and the SPD, rather than Merkel and the CDU, or the Greens? The most important reason may be that in Ukraine, especially on the radical right of the political spectrum, the name Steinmeier is known and hated above all in connection with the so-called ‘Steinmeier algorithm’ – essentially a sort of roadmap, or to-do-list, for the implementation of the Minsk Accords drawn up by Steinmeier as Foreign Minister under Merkel. While Nord Stream 2 was unforgiveable from a Ukrainian perspective, Minsk was a mortal sin in the eyes not just of the Ukrainian right (among other things, it would have granted autonomy to the Russian-speaking parts of Ukraine) but also of the United States, which had been bypassed by it just as Ukraine was to be bypassed by Nord Stream 2. If the latter was an unfriendly act among business partners, the former was an act of high treason against a temporarily absent king, now back to clean up and take revenge.

As much as the EU has become a subsidiary of NATO, its officials can be assumed to know as little as anybody else about the ultimate war aims of the United States. With the recent visit of the US secretaries of state and defense to Kyiv, it seems that the Americans have moved the goalposts forward, from defending Ukraine against the Russian invasion to permanently weakening the Russian military. To what extent the US have now taken control was forcefully demonstrated when on their trip back to the United States the two secretaries stopped over at the American airbase in Ramstein, Germany, the same that the US used for the war on terror and similar operations. There they met with the defense ministers of no less than forty countries, whom they had ordered to show up to pledge their support for Ukraine and, of course, the United States. Significantly the meeting was not called at NATO headquarters in Brussels, a multinational venue at least formally, but on a military facility which the United States claims to be under its and only its sovereignty, to the muted occasional disagreement of the German government. It was here, the United States presiding under two huge flags, American and Ukrainian, that the Scholz government finally agreed to deliver the long-demanded ‘heavy arms’ to Ukraine, without apparently being allowed a say on the exact purpose for which its tanks and howitzers would be used. (The forty nations agreed to reconvene once every month to figure out what further military equipment Ukraine requires.) One cannot but recall in this context the observation of a retired American diplomat at an early stage of the war that the US was going to fight the Russians ‘to the last Ukrainian’.

As is well-known, the attention span not just of the American public but also of the American foreign-policy establishment is short. Dramatic events inside or outside the United States may critically diminish national interest in a far-away place like Ukraine – not to mention the upcoming midterm elections and the impending campaign of Donald Trump to regain the presidency in 2024. From an American perspective this is not much of a problem because the risks associated with US foreign adventures almost exclusively accrue to the locals; see Afghanistan. All the more important, one would think, for European countries to know what exactly the war aims are of the United States in Ukraine, and how they will be updated as the war continues.

After the Ramstein meeting, the talk was not just of a ‘permanent weakening’ of Russian military power, never mind a peace settlement, but of an outright victory for Ukraine and its allies. This will test the Cold War wisdom that a conventional war against a nuclear power cannot be won. For Europeans the result will be a matter of life and death – which might explain why the German government hesitated for a few weeks to supply Ukraine with arms that could be used, for example, to move onto Russian territory, first perhaps to hit Russian supply lines, later for more. (When the writer of these lines read about the new American aspiration for a ‘victory’ he was for a brief but unforgettable moment hit by a deep feeling of fear.) If Germany had the courage to ask for a say on the American-Ukrainian strategy, nothing like this appears to have been on offer: the German tanks, it seems, will be handed over carte blanche. Rumours have it that the numerous wargames commissioned in recent years from military thinktanks by the American government involving Ukraine, NATO and Russia have one way or other all ended in nuclear Armageddon, at least in Europe.

Certainly, a nuclear ending is not what is being publicly advertised. Instead one hears that the United States assumes that defeating Russia will take many years, with a protracted stand-off, a long-smoldering stalemate in the mud of a land war, neither party being able to move: the Russians because the Ukrainians will unendingly be fed more money and more material, if not manpower, by a newly Americanized ‘West’, the Ukrainians because they are too weak to enter Russia and threaten its capital. For the United States this might appear quite comfortable: a proxy war, with its balance of forces adjusted and re-adjusted by them in line with their changing strategic needs. In fact, when Biden requested in the last days of April another 33 billion dollars of aid to Ukraine for 2022 alone, he suggested that this will be only the beginning of a long-term commitment, as expensive as Afghanistan, but, he said, worth it. Unless, of course, the Russians start firing more of their miracle missiles, unpack their chemical arms and, ultimately, put to use their nuclear arsenal, small battle-field warheads first.

Is there, in spite of all this, a prospect for peace after war, or less ambitious: for a regional security architecture, perhaps after the Americans have lost interest, or Russia feels that it cannot or need not continue the war? A Eurasian settlement, if we want to call it so, will probably presuppose some kind of regime change in Moscow. After what happened, it is hard to imagine Western European leaders publicly expressing confidence in Putin, or a Putinesque successor. At the same time, there are no reasons to believe that the economic sanctions imposed by the United West on Russia will cause a public uprising toppling the Putin regime. In fact, going by the experience of the Allies in the Second World War with the carpet bombing of German cities, sanctions might well have the opposite effect, making people close ranks behind their government.

De-industrializing Russia, à la von der Leyen, will not be possible anyway as China will ultimately not allow it: not least because it needs a functioning Russian state for its New Silk Road project. Popular demands in the West for Putin and his camarilla to stand trial in the International Criminal Court in The Hague will, for these reasons alone, remain unfulfilled. Note in any case that Russia, like the United States, has not signed the treaty establishing the court, thereby securing for its citizens immunity from prosecution. Like Kissinger and Bush Jr., and others in the US, Putin will therefore remain at large until the end of his days, whatever that end will be like. Those European countries that are historically not exactly inclined toward Russophilia, like the Baltic countries and Poland, and certainly also Ukraine, stand a good chance of convincing the public in places like Germany or Scandinavia that trusting Russia can be dangerous to your national health.

A regime change may, however, also be needed in Ukraine. In recent years the ultra-nationalist end of Ukrainian politics, with deep roots in the fascist and indeed pro-Nazi Ukrainian past, seems to have gained strength in a new alliance with ultra-interventionist forces in the United States. One consequence, among others, was the disappearance of Minsk from the Ukrainian political agenda. A prominent exponent of the Ukrainian ultra-right is the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany, mentioned above, who let it be known in an interview with Frankfurter Allgemeine that for him, someone like Navalny was exactly the same as Putin when it comes to Ukraine’s right to exist as a sovereign nation-state. Asked what he would say to his Russian friends, he denied having any, indeed having had any at any time in his life, as Russians are by nature out to extinguish the Ukrainian people.

Melnyk’s political family goes back to the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) in the interwar years and under the German occupation, with which its leaders collaborated until they discovered that the Nazis really didn’t distinguish between Russians and Ukrainians when it came to killing and enslaving people. The OUN was led by two men, one Andrij Melnyk (same name as the ambassador) and one Stepan Bandera, the latter to the extent possible somewhat to the right of the former. Both are reported to have committed war crimes under German license, Bandera as police chief, appointed by the Nazis, in Lviv (Lemberg). Later Bandera was pushed aside by the Germans and put under house arrest, like other local fascists elsewhere. (The Nazis didn’t believe in federalism.) After the war, the Soviet Union restored, Bandera moved to Munich, the postwar capital of a host of Eastern European collaborators, among them the Croatian Ustasha. There he was in 1959 assassinated by a Soviet agent, having been sentenced to death by a Soviet court. Melnyk also ended up in Germany and died in the 1970s in a hospital in Cologne.

Today’s Melnyk calls Bandera his ‘hero’. In 2015, shortly after being appointed ambassador, he visited his grave in Munich where he laid down flowers, reporting on the visit on Twitter. This drew a formal reproach from the German foreign ministry, headed at the time by none other than Steinmeier. Melnyk also came out publicly in support of the so-called Azov Battalion, an armed paramilitary group in Ukraine, founded in 2014, which is generally considered the military branch of the country’s several neofascist movements. It is not quite clear to the non-specialist how much influence Melnyk’s political current has in the government of Ukraine today. There certainly are also other currents in the governing coalition; whether their influence will further decline or, to the contrary, increase as the war drags on appears hard to predict at this point. Nationalist movements sometimes dream of a nation rising out of the death on the battlefield of the best of its sons, a new or resurrected nation welded together by heroic sacrifice. To the extent that Ukraine is governed by political forces of this kind, supported from the outside by a United States eager to let the Ukrainian war last, it is hard to see how and when the bloodshed should end, other than by the enemy either capitulating or reaching for his nuclear gun.

Ukrainian politics apart, an American proxy war for Ukraine may force Russia into a close relationship of dependence on Beijing, securing China a captive Eurasian ally and giving it assured access to Russian resources, at bargain prices as the West would no longer compete for them. Russia, in turn, could benefit from Chinese technology, to the extent that it would be made available. At first glance, an alliance like this might appear to be contrary to the geostrategic interests of the United States. It would, however, come with an equally close, and equally asymmetrical, American-dominated alliance between the United States and Western Europe, one that would keep Germany under control and suppress French aspirations for ‘European sovereignty’. Very likely, what Europe can deliver to the United States would exceed what Russia can deliver to China, so that a loss of Russia to China would be more than compensated by the gains from a tightening of American hegemony over Western Europe. A proxy war in Ukraine could thus be attractive to a United States seeking to build a global alliance for its imminent battle with China over the next New World Order, monopolar or bipolar in old or new ways, to be fought out in coming years, after the end of the end of history.

https://newleftreview.org/sidecar/posts/240

**********************************

From Cassad's Telegram Account
:

***

forwarded from
Rybar

Image

Losses of the Ukrainian side as a result of a special military operation of the RF Armed Forces as of May 9, 2022

▪️During the day, the Armed Forces of Ukraine lost 287 people killed, wounded and captured. The total losses in killed, wounded and captured in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, NGU and State Border Service are over 53 thousand people .

▪️9 tanks , 22 armored vehicles, 14 field artillery and mortar guns, 3 MLRS, 1 long-range and medium-range air defense systems, 1 short-range air defense system, 1 radar, 37 vehicles and special equipment, 8 aircraft, 10 helicopters and 6 UAVs were lost.

All data are predictable: the Ukrainian side in internal reports does not have the exact number of casualties for each category. Therefore, in internal reports, the tendency is always to underestimate the real number of losses .

High resolution infographics

***

forwarded from
Rybar
🇺🇦The day before, a batch of foreign weapons and military equipment arrived in Soledar . The Russian Defense Ministry said that the train at the Sol railway station was hit: the equipment was disabled.

According to our information, the Ukrainian side, with the help of local Kulibins, has already organized a repair shop at the Bas feed mill . Repair of armored vehicles and artillery pieces is in full swing.

***

forwarded from
Zvezdanews
⚡️Briefing of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:

◾️During the night, high-precision missiles of the Russian Aerospace Forces destroyed two command posts and a Ukrainian battery of multiple launch rocket systems "Grad" in the area of ​​​​the village of Popasnaya, 18 areas of concentration of manpower and military equipment in the area of ​​​​Lisichansk, in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bZolotoye, a US-made counter-battery radar.

◾️Ukrainian helicopters were destroyed by high-precision Onyx missiles from the Bastion coastal missile system in the area of ​​​​the settlement of ARTSIZ in the Odessa region.

◾️Aviation hit 52 areas of concentration of personnel and military equipment, as well as an ammunition depot near the village of Glukhov.

◾️Rocket troops and artillery hit eight command posts, 26 artillery units in firing positions, as well as 211 areas of concentration of manpower and military equipment.

◾️As a result of the strikes, up to 350 nationalists were destroyed, 56 units of military equipment were disabled. In the Bogodukhov area, four Ukrainian installations of Smerch multiple launch rocket systems and one launcher of the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system were destroyed.

◾️Russian air defense systems shot down three aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force. Two MiG-29s in the Iverskoye and Novodonetskoye regions of the Donetsk People's Republic, as well as one Su-25 in the Pogonovka region of the Kharkiv region.

◾️Three Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, including two Bayraktar-TB2s, were destroyed in the area of ​​Zmeiny Island.

◾️12 Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles were shot down in the air in the areas of the settlements of Balakliya, Shiykovka, Goptovka, Tsupovka, Small and Large Passages of the Kharkiv region, Kamenka of the Cherkasy region, Bryanka and Avdiivka of the Donetsk People's Republic, Pavlovka of the Luhansk People's Republic.

◾️Three Smerch MLRS rockets were intercepted in the areas of Izyum and Snezhkovka settlements.

***

Сolonelcassad
It is reported from the field that the allied forces were able to break through the defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Belogorovka area, forcing the Seversky Donets.

Taking into account the offensive from Popasna, where the defense was also broken through, up to 8,000 Ukrainian servicemen entrenched in Severodonetsk and Lysichansk could be surrounded. (c) Poddubny

The loss of Belogorovka, coupled with the retreat from Popasnaya, poses a more than real threat to the Soledar-Lysichansk road, which supplies the northern part of the Donbass grouping of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

***

forwarded from
Readovka
Devils in the flesh — in Lvov, vandals desecrated the Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate

While the Ukrainian authorities are enthusiastically fighting with Soviet monuments, Ukrainian citizens in Lvov desecrated the St. Vladimir Church of the UOC, subordinate to the Moscow Patriarchate. Unknown "heroes", apparently considering this a worthy contribution to the victory over the Russians, flooded the entrance doors with mounting foam so that the believers would not get inside, and covered the walls with inscriptions: "Damn the FSB", "Putin's house", "Russians are not people."

The perpetrators of the "action" remained unknown, and local nationalists promptly assured that they had nothing to do with this vandalism, and that this was allegedly the work of the Orthodox believers themselves.

Desiring, apparently, to strike at the strength of the spirit of the enemies of Ukraine, the vandals once again forced to ask a rhetorical question whether Ukrainian “activists” have anything sacred at all. Earlier, Readovka reported that a bill was submitted to the Verkhovna Rada providing for the liquidation of the UOC of the Moscow Patriarchate.

(Galacia to the Poles! bp)

***

forwarded from
Militarist
According to Western experts, Ukraine has already lost the war, as it lost:

🇺🇦80% of oil and gas fields
🇺🇦All refineries and large tank farms
🇺🇦Fields for sowing
🇺🇦coal mines
🇺🇦Four major ports
🇺🇦Significant part of nuclear and significant coal generation
🇺🇦Oil and gas fields on the Black Sea shelf
🇺🇦Metallurgical plants in Mariupol and Krivoy Rog
🇺🇦Almost completely - the national military-industrial complex

***

forwarded from
Warsaw Mermaid
🇩🇰🇵🇱Severyanochka @lady_north writes that today 14 Leopard 2A7 tanks and British armored vehicles were sent from the Danish port of Esbjerg to Poland.

🇺🇦🇩🇪Interestingly, it was already discussed this week that it was the Leopards that the Polish government was going to close the gap in the tank forces after the transfer of their T-72s to Ukraine. Everything is conditional within the framework of the documents, according to which German weapons are supplied to countries that “free of charge” transfer their weapons to Ukraine .

And according to media reports, a few weeks ago, Berlin just received an offer from Warsaw to transfer “a large number of tanks” to Ukraine. Not without benefit for themselves, as you understand.

However, the transfer of German Leopards seems to have stalled, even the visit of the Prime Minister of Poland to the German Chancellor did not help. And it is not surprising that the Germans themselves do not have enough Leopard 2, and even more so they are not enough to replace the huge number of tanks transferred by Poland (Warsaw transferred 200 copies of the T-72 to Kyiv).

🇸🇰In Slovakia, by the way, the idea of ​​the Polish authorities was appreciated and they also say that they are ready to supply Ukraine with their T-72 tanks in exchange , of course, for the German Leopards. True, the volumes there are smaller - only 30 copies.

***

forwarded from
Readovka
The map of hostilities and the situation on the fronts on the evening of May 8

For several days now, Ukrainian propaganda has been intensively dispersing the topic of the successful assault on Serpent Island, on which the phrase “Russian ship go to ...” was first heard, and then “killed Ukrainian heroes”, allegedly who died during the defense of the island, suddenly "resurrected" and surrendered. For Kiev, the capture of Serpentine is not so much a tactical issue as a propaganda one. Apparently, Zelensky and his Western handlers set the task of taking possession of the island at any cost by May 9. But they don't seem to be successful. You can read more on this topic here.

⚔️The situation on the fronts:

▫️Near Kharkov there are fights for small settlements. No significant advance of troops from both sides was noted today, but it is clear that as long as the railway between Dnepropetrovsk and Kharkov is in operation, the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be in full swing;

▫️In the Luhansk direction, heavy fighting continues in the Rubizhne-Severodonetsk-Lysichansk triangle. In the evening, a message arrived about the complete and final cleansing of Popasna from the Ukrainian Armed Forces. At the same time, units of the NM of the LPR and the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the allied forces occupied the settlement of Nizhnee , which will allow them to gain a tactical advantage when reaching the southern outskirts of Lisichansk. In Belogorivka, a school where the Armed Forces of Ukraine had placed their barracks was attacked by artillery forces of the allied forces;

▫️The Donetsk direction pleased - the forces of the Republic, with the fire support of the RF Armed Forces, liberated and established full control over Komsomolsky and Lesnoy (Volnovakha district);

▫️On the Izyum part of the front in the vicinity of Krasny Liman, fierce fighting continues in the forest belt near the village of Dibrovo. In Kramatorsk , Ukrainian units have set up firing positions in a school and a kindergarten , and civilians are being held in basements. Attempts to force the Northern Donets River by Ukrainian units do not stop. Pontoon crossings are regularly destroyed by pinpoint fire from artillery and rocket troops;

🎯 Traditionally, a powerful "calibration" was carried out during the day. At the railway station "Sol" in Soledar, a train with American military equipment and weapons for the Ukrainian army was destroyed by a missile attack. Today's strikes by the Russian Armed Forces on Odessa destroyed the base of foreign mercenaries in one of the buildings of the Grande Pettine Hotel;

🚀Upon arrival . The Armed Forces of Ukraine once again launched a missile attack on Donetsk and Gorlovka . Footage of the consequences of a missile attack in the Kherson region appeared - the Armed Forces of Ukraine fired at the city of Naked Pristan from the Tochka-U shopping mall. There were also reports of explosions in the Sumy region ;

🌐 In the world. The G7 adopted a statement on 8 May openly acknowledging that the countries of the group were "unified in their determination" to prevent a Russian victory;

👁Interesting facts: A video has surfaced showing Ukrainian troops using their new 152mm Bogdan self-propelled artillery mount. We figure out if the wolf is as scary as Ukrainian propaganda draws it . The soldiers of the Chechen Republic are strong in spirit and laugh even after being wounded .

Image

***

forwarded from
WAR[Z]ONE
74th day of Russia's special operation in Ukraine. The main thing:

▪️The Russian Armed Forces destroyed a Ukrainian project 1241 corvette, two Ukrainian Su-24s and one Mi-24 were destroyed over Zmeiny Island, and US weapons and equipment delivered to Ukraine near the settlement of Soledar were also destroyed

▪️aviation hit 54 areas with Ukrainian military and equipment, destroyed 380 nationalists

▪️the city of Popasna is completely liberated from Ukrainian troops

▪️the commanders of the 36th Marine Brigade of the Ukrainian troops were captured, testified, from which it follows that the military asked Kyiv to agree on their fate, but they were lied to, promising help that never came

▪️they also said that foreign mercenaries served in the marines of Ukraine, and the Nazi battalion "Azov" was losing ground, because of which the marines suffered heavy losses

▪️prisoners reported that Musk's Starlink satellites were distributing Internet to the Ukrainian military in Mariupol

▪️US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield confirmed that the US is providing intelligence to the Ukrainian side

▪️US First Lady Jill Biden made a visit to Ukraine, visiting the region bordering Slovakia, her trip was not previously announced

▪️American diplomats visit embassy in Kiev, State Department expects to resume work of the diplomatic mission in the coming weeks @rian_ru | subscribe |

***

forwarded from
Vladislav Coal
Summary of hostilities on May 8, 2022 from Vladislav

Ugolny

🎯The Kharkiv direction is unchanged: the Armed Forces of Ukraine are mastering the road to Stary Saltov, to the north of it there is a "gray zone" up to Liptsy. To the south, the front line is stable, between Balakleya and Izyum, the Armed Forces of Ukraine continue to attempt to force the Seversky Donets.

🎯PAVLOGRAD ARCH:

🏹The northern flank of the arc (from Izyum to Popasnaya) is unchanged in the Izyum area. East of Oskol , the Russians entrenched themselves in the village of Shandrigolovo, and fighting continues in the area of ​​Krasny Liman and Drobyshevo. It is reported that the Seversky Donets was successfully crossed in the area of ​​Belogorovka and the Bakhmut-Lysichansk highway was taken under fire control. In the Rubizhny area , fighting continues in Voevodovka and in the southern industrial zone. On Bakhmutka , the battles for Orekhovo continue. Nizhnye was liberated, the fighting moved to Toshkovka.

🏹The central front (from Popasnaya to Marinka) - the cleansing of Popasna, which was liberated yesterday, is being completed . In the Avdeevka area, advancement in the Kamenka area. In Maryinka - no change.

🏹The southern flank of the arc (from the Dnieper River to Maryinka) - battles are reported in the area of ​​Novomikhailovka, Velikaya Novoselka, Temirovka, Poltavka and Shcharbakov.

🎯Mariupol cauldron - the assault on Azovstal continues.

🎯Kherson-Nikolaev direction - front line without change. The main battles were to the west of Aleksandrovka and in the Vysokopole region. Past

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Mon May 09, 2022 11:35 pm

Briefly about Ukraine. 05/09/2022
May 10, 0:22 am

Image

Briefly about Ukraine. 05/09/2022

1. Mariupol.
Shelling and a gradual cleansing of Azovstal continue. From the cellars they continue to demand salvation, which will not be.

2.Zaporozhye.
On the line Kamenskoye-Orekhov-Gulyaipole without major changes. The fighting went south of Orekhov and southeast of Gulyaipol. Fighting continues in the villages between Gulyaipole and Velikaya Novoselovka.

3. Carbon.
There is no significant progress on the Novomikhailovka-Ugledar-Velikaya Novoseloveka line.

4. Marinka.
No significant changes. Fights are positional in nature.

5. Avdiivka.
In the Avdiivka industrial zone, no changes. There is no promotion. Fighting continued in the area of ​​​​Troitsky and Novoselka-2.

6. LPR.
The RF Armed Forces crossed the Seversky Donets and entered Belogorskoye. The Armed Forces of Ukraine launched counterattacks throughout the day. Fighting in the area of ​​the village continues. The loss of the village will pose a threat to the communications of the Severodonetsk grouping of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Fighting also continued in the Voevodovka area. Popasnaya has been completely cleared.

7. Raisin.
Bolshaya Kamyshevakha was taken. Fighting continues north of the Barvenkovo-Slavyansk highway, as well as near Krasny Liman. The enemy is preparing for encirclement battles in Slavyansk and Kramatorsk.

8. Kharkov.
The enemy advanced near Stary Saltov in the direction of Rubizhny. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation take up defense here on the line Kazachya-Lopan-Liptsy-Veseloe-Ternovaya Staritsa. Attempts to attack Lipcy were not successful.

9. Nikolaev.
Positional battles continued in the Nikolaev and Nikopol directions. The positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Nikolaev continue to be subjected to systematic strikes. The enemy periodically tries to shell Kherson.

10. Odessa.
Attempts to attack Zmeiny Island and land troops there ended in heavy losses for the Armed Forces of Ukraine in people and materiel.
In addition, this activity caused an intensification of attacks on the military infrastructure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Odessa, which also led to losses in people and equipment.

The broadcast of hostilities in Ukraine continues as usual in Telegram https://t.me/boris_rozhin (if you are interested, subscribe)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7605781.html

Google Translator

*****************************.

Ukraine - Putin On Why The War Started, Failed Attempts On Snake Island, Other Issues
Updates below (17:15 UTC)

It is Victory Day. As Ernest Hemingway said:

Anyone who loves freedom owes such a debt to the Red Army that it can never be repaid.

The most important part of Vladimir Putin's speech to the Victory Parade on the Red Square is the narrative that explains how the current war in Ukraine began. Putin is correct in seeing this as a NATO proxy war against Russia:

[D]espite all controversies in international relations, Russia has always advocated the establishment of an equal and indivisible security system which is critically needed for the entire international community.
Last December we proposed signing a treaty on security guarantees. Russia urged the West to hold an honest dialogue in search for meaningful and compromising solutions, and to take account of each other’s interests. All in vain. NATO countries did not want to heed us, which means they had totally different plans. And we saw it.

Another punitive operation in Donbass, an invasion of our historic lands, including Crimea, was openly in the making. Kiev declared that it could attain nuclear weapons. The NATO bloc launched an active military build-up on the territories adjacent to us.

Thus, an absolutely unacceptable threat to us was steadily being created right on our borders. There was every indication that a clash with neo-Nazis and Banderites backed by the United States and their minions was unavoidable.

Let me repeat, we saw the military infrastructure being built up, hundreds of foreign advisors starting work, and regular supplies of cutting-edge weaponry being delivered from NATO countries. The threat grew every day.

Russia launched a pre-emptive strike at the aggression. It was a forced, timely and the only correct decision. A decision by a sovereign, strong and independent country.


The use of 'pre-emptive strike' is somewhat misleading. In fact the Ukraine started the war on Wednesday, February 16 2022, when its forces near the Donbas republics began preparatory artillery strikes for an all out ground attack on the Donbas republics.
The February 15 report of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine recorded some 41 explosions in the ceasefire areas. This increased to 76 explosions on Feb 16, 316 on Feb 17, 654 on Feb 18, 1413 on Feb 19, a total of 2026 of Feb 20 and 21 and 1484 on Feb 22.

The OSCE mission reports showed that the great majority of impact explosions of the artillery were on the separatist side of the ceasefire line.

Image

On February 19 the Ukrainian President Zelensky announced at the Munich Security Conference that the Ukraine would ditch the Budapest memorandum and all related agreements. The Budapest memorandum is about Ukraine committing to be a non-nuclear state.

Those two issues, an imminent ground attack on Donbas and the Ukraine threatening to strive for nuclear weapons, drove the Russian decision on February 21 to recognize the Donbas republics as independent states. (The legal precedence for doing such is the 'western' recognition of Kosovo as an independent state.)

Common defense agreements between the independent states and the Russian Federation were signed. Three days later, during which the Ukrainian attacks on the Donbas republics continued, Russian troops entered the Ukraine under Article 51 of the U.S. charter.

---

Over the last days there were some interesting developments of the ground.

1. North of Karkov Russian troops are pulling back to shorten their frontline. The city will have to wait until the Donbas has been regained. The Ukraine again declares it is wining as it retakes the towns the Russians have earlier left.

Image

2. After heavy fighting Russian forces broke through the eastern Donbas front and conquered the heavily defended city of Popasna.

Image

The city is on a hill about 260 meters above sea level. This is about 100+ meters higher than the areas north, south and west of it. Artillery stationed on the hill will have a very good view and can reach deep into Ukrainian held grounds. It will be able to interdict resupplies on nearby roads to the Ukrainian front troops.

3. The Ukrainian military had launched a commando attack on Snake Island (in the semi circle 30 miles south of Odessa).

Image

However after previous Ukrainian air attacks Russian troops had already left the island and the Russian airforce had laid an ambush for the attack forces. The Russian Defense Ministry briefings mentioned Ukrainian losses around Snake (Zmeinyi) Island and related operations several times.

07.05.2022 (20:15):

The following have been shot down in the air near Zmeinyi Island: 1 Ukrainian Su-24 bomber, 1 Su-27 fighter jet, 3 Mi-8 helicopters with paratroopers and 2 Bayraktar-TB2 UAV. The Ukrainian amphibious assault boat Stanislav has also been destroyed.
08.05.2022 (10:45):

A Ukrainian naval corvette of project 1241 has also been destroyed near Odessa.
...
During the night, Russian air defence means destroyed 2 more Ukrainian Su-24 bombers and 1 Mi-24 helicopter of the Ukrainian Air Force over Snake Island, and also shot down 1 Bayraktar-TB2 unmanned aerial vehicle near Odessa.
A total of 4 Ukrainian aircraft, 4 helicopters, including 3 with paratroopers on board, 3 Bayraktar-TB2 UAV and 1 Ukrainian Navy amphibious assault boat have been destroyed in the area during the day.

08.05.2022 (19:30)

Russian air defence means have shot down 1 Bayraktar-TB2 unmanned aerial vehicles near Zmeinyi Island.
09.05.2022 (12:45)


Oniks high-precision missiles launched by Bastion coastal missile system near Artsiz, Odessa region, have destroyed Ukrainian helicopters at a bounce platform.
...
Three Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles, including two Bayraktar-TB2, have been hit over Snake Island.
(Bounce platform is a mistranslation for a helicopter supply pad that is not a full airport.

The operation was quite costly for the Ukrainian side. Besides the 60+ paratroopers who were killed during the assault one of the helicopter also had the deputy commander of the Ukrainian navy on board. Today it was announced that Col. Ihor Bedzai was killed in action when his helicopter came under Russian airforce fire.

More than 4 helicopters, 4 jets and 6 Bayraktar drones were lost for zero gain. The U.S. is in the process of giving the Ukraine a total of 16 Mi-17 transport helicopters that were originally supposed to go to Afghanistan. At the current Ukrainian rate of losses such supplies, just like others, will not last for long.

Under the current circumstances Snake Island is of little military value. It seems that the sole point of the Ukrainian operation to retake it was to create a propaganda item for today's Victory Parade. It now is one but for the Russian side.

Update 17:15 UTC:

The last briefing (09.05.2022 (19:15) by the Russian Defense Ministry (published after the above post) again mentions Snake Island:

According to the updated information, 6 Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopters have been destroyed during the night near Artsiz in Odessa Region near the Chervonoglinskoe military airfield by Onyks high-precision missiles from the Bastion coastal missile system.
...
On 7 May, on direct orders from Zelensky, the Ukrainian General Staff, with the direct involvement of advisers from the USA and Britain, planned a major provocation to seize Zmeiny Island.
Over the past two days, the Kiev regime has made several desperate attempts to land air and sea assaults on Zmeiny Island, which is important for controlling the northwestern part of the Black Sea.

The Ukrainian provocation was thwarted as a result of the competent actions of a Russian Armed Forces unit on the island. The enemy suffered heavy losses.

4 Ukrainian airplanes, including 3 Su-24 and 1 Su-27, 3 Mi-8 helicopters with paratroopers on board, and 1 Mi-24 helicopter have been shot down in the air while repelling the attacks near Zmeiny Island.

Within two days, 29 Ukrainian UAVs have been shot down in the air, including 8 Bayraktar TB-2 strike UAVs. Meanwhile, 4 Bayraktar drones have been shot down this afternoon.

Also, 3 armoured Ukrainian amphibious assault boats carrying Ukrainian naval personnel were destroyed during an attempted landing on the night of May 8.

As a result of Zelensky's thoughtless provocation, more than 50 Ukrainian saboteurs have been killed at sea and on the coast during the landing and attempts to consolidate on the island.

24 bodies of dead Ukrainian servicemen were left on the shore of Zmeiny Island.


Posted by b on May 9, 2022 at 16:20 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/05/u ... .html#more

*********************************

From Cassad's Telegram Account:

***

forwarded from
Rybar
🇬🇧🇺🇦🛤Partial Restoration of Ukraine's Railway Network Objects Destroyed by the RF Armed Forces

Five days ago, the RF Armed Forces launched a pinpoint attack on the Volovets traction substation , which feeds the railway at the junction of Ukraine, Slovakia and Hungary.

▪️The substation was put back into operation two days ago. The voltage in the network has been restored, the DC railway line in Transcarpathia is working again.

In total, there are three traction substations on this section, which need to be disabled in order for the line to stop:
➖Substation "Volovets" - 48.712222, 23.193333
➖Substation "Skotarskoye" - 48.730556, 23.268333
➖Substation "Slavsko" - 48.766667, 23.331944

▪️At the same time, news appeared about the commissioning of the Bucha-Irpen railway bridge , which the Ukrainians themselves undermined at the end of February.

A single-track section Korosten - Sarny - Kovel was launched . There are not so many stations, it is difficult to organize heavy traffic on it, although it is quite suitable as an auxiliary one for distributing flows. But from Korosten there is a line to Shepetovka through Novograd-Volynsky : it is electrified, and along it, bypassing Kazatin, they can quite organize the flow of goods.

▪️The bridge under Zatoka in the Belgorod-Dnestrovsky district of the Odessa region after three "calibrations" continues to function.

These three events demonstrate better than our other words the need to continue systematic work to permanently disable not only all critical facilities of the Ukrainian railway network, but also to undermine the capabilities of Ukrliznitsa to restore these facilities.

Because if you point out one station once a week, while keeping the enemy able to repair it, everything will be restored in record time. They will also have time to launch a new line from the territory of Poland.

We once again publish a list of important objects of the railway network of Ukraine:
▪️ List of all bridges across the Dnieper
▪️ List of railway bridges in western Ukraine
▪️Traction substations: part 1 and part 2
▪️ Critical substations on the border with Poland
▪️Depot: list 1 and list 2
▪️ Recovery trains High resolution

***

forwarded from
Rybar
🇬🇧🇺🇦🛤Partial Restoration of Ukraine's Railway Network Objects Destroyed by the RF Armed Forces

Five days ago, the RF Armed Forces launched a pinpoint attack on the Volovets traction substation , which feeds the railway at the junction of Ukraine, Slovakia and Hungary.

▪️The substation was put back into operation two days ago. The voltage in the network has been restored, the DC railway line in Transcarpathia is working again.

In total, there are three traction substations on this section, which need to be disabled in order for the line to stop:
➖Substation "Volovets" - 48.712222, 23.193333
➖Substation "Skotarskoye" - 48.730556, 23.268333
➖Substation "Slavsko" - 48.766667, 23.331944

▪️At the same time, news appeared about the commissioning of the Bucha-Irpen railway bridge , which the Ukrainians themselves undermined at the end of February.

A single-track section Korosten - Sarny - Kovel was launched . There are not so many stations, it is difficult to organize heavy traffic on it, although it is quite suitable as an auxiliary one for distributing flows. But from Korosten there is a line to Shepetovka through Novograd-Volynsky : it is electrified, and along it, bypassing Kazatin, they can quite organize the flow of goods.

▪️The bridge under Zatoka in the Belgorod-Dnestrovsky district of the Odessa region after three "calibrations" continues to function.

These three events demonstrate better than our other words the need to continue systematic work to permanently disable not only all critical facilities of the Ukrainian railway network, but also to undermine the capabilities of Ukrliznitsa to restore these facilities.

Because if you point out one station once a week, while keeping the enemy able to repair it, everything will be restored in record time. They will also have time to launch a new line from the territory of Poland.

We once again publish a list of important objects of the railway network of Ukraine:
▪️ List of all bridges across the Dnieper
▪️ List of railway bridges in western Ukraine
▪️Traction substations: part 1 and part 2
▪️ Critical substations on the border with Poland
▪️Depot: list 1 and list 2
▪️ Recovery trains High resolution

Image

***

forwarded from
Readovka
❗️In the area of ​​the city of Soledar, weapons delivered to the railway station "Sol" from the United States and Western countries, as well as the personnel of the reserve units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation

, were destroyed. in the Chuguev region and 6 warehouses of rocket and artillery weapons in the regions of Krasnaya Gora, Verkhnekamenka, Mayaki (DPR), Novodruzhevsk (LPR), Reznikovo and Nikolaevka of the Kharkov region.

What else was stated in the Russian Ministry of Defense:

- Operational-tactical and army aviation hit 54 areas of concentration of personnel and military equipment. As a result of the strikes, up to 380 nationalists were destroyed, 38 units of military equipment were disabled;

- The missile forces destroyed the launcher of the Osa-AKM air defense system in the Nikolaev region, the installation of the Smerch MLRS in the Soledar region, as well as the radar station for detecting air targets in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe settlement of Velikaya Korenikha, Nikolaev region;

- Artillery units hit 6 command posts, 28 Ukrainian artillery units in firing positions, 179 areas of concentration of manpower and military equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as 2 ammunition depots;

– In the area of ​​​​the settlement of Pogonovka, Kharkiv region, a Su-25 aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force was shot down. In addition, 2 Ukrainian UAVs were destroyed over the settlements of Mandrykino (DPR) and Peremozhnoe (LPR);

- Russian air defense systems in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bZmeiny Island destroyed one Bayraktar-TB2 UAV.

***

forwarded from
Rybar
🇬🇧🇺🇦Unfortunately, we are forced to state that the video of the destruction of the Mi-8AMTSh from Zmeiny Island is not the result of the work of the RF Armed Forces. This is a Russian helicopter destroyed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine .

The board was assigned to the 487th separate helicopter regiment. The deputy commander of the regiment for military-political work was also killed. Eternal memory to the fallen.

The island is now in the gray zone.

UPD: For especially zealous subscribers and advisers: if we are mistaken in something or receive incorrect information, we are not ashamed to admit it. And if we deny real combat losses, we will simply devalue the combat work of the RF Armed Forces and the memory of the fallen.

***

forwarded from
Rybar
🇺🇦Nationalists from the Azov Regiment, locked in the Mariupol Azovstal plant, held a press conference for the Ukrainian media today. The deputy commander of Azov, Svyatoslav Palamar (Kalina), accused the Ukrainian authorities of “cynicism” and disruption of preparations for war (though without naming specific names).

The day before , Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine Iryna Vereshchuk had already stated that all civilians had been evacuated from Azovstal. However, the Azov people said they were not sure that they had evacuated everyone. Like, it is necessary to dismantle the rubble.

In fact, Zelensky and his team are now trying to squeeze the maximum “overcome” out of the evacuation - they say, yes, “the heroic defenders of Azovstal died, but we evacuated at least all the civilians.” BUT "Kalina , with her media activity, breaks this picture for him. Resentment is heard in his words: they were never saved, and only death awaits ahead. I wonder how soon in their appeals "Kalina" will begin to name the specific culprits in the death of "Azov"?

For the Kyiv authorities, of course, it is more profitable now that “due to the fault of the Russian occupiers”, Kalina and the company suddenly lost the Internet, and they themselves were buried right under Azovstal.

And that can be inconvenient. A symbol of heroic resistance can turn against its own creators.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10712
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part IV

Post by blindpig » Tue May 10, 2022 1:29 pm

UN Envoy: Docs Found Show Ukraine’s Plans To Attack Russia

Image
Russian envoy to the UN said that during the special military operation in Ukraine, Moscow forces have found documents that demonstrate Ukraine planned to attack Russian territory. May. 6, 2022. | Photo: Twitter/Dmitry Polyanskiy

Published 9 May 2022 (9 hours 25 minutes ago)

During the special military operation conducted by Russian forces in Ukrainian territory, the Moscow army found documents supporting Ukraine's plans to carry out strikes against Russia.

Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia's deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, commented Monday on the documents discovered by Russian troops during the special military operation conducted in Ukrainian territory. He said that the records show concrete Ukraine's plans to carry out strikes against Russia.

Speaking to Sky News, a British free-to-air television news channel and organization, the Russian envoy to the UN said that "it is obvious right now that we are having a proxy war with NATO, so NATO is waging a proxy war with Russia, not vice versa. This is the reality that we face."

"Documents that we discovered at the beginning of our special military operation indicate with all clarity that there were concrete plans to strike on Russia from Ukraine. There were also concrete plans to strike on Donbass and the documents of [the] Ukrain[ian] General Staff indicate this. So, this was kind of a preemptive strike from Russia and we did it with the full conformity of Article 5 of the UN charter and we notified the UN about it," said Polyanskiy.

Russian "demilitarization" and "denazification" operation in Ukraine was justified based on the threat the country faced, said Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier in the day, referring to Polyansky's remarks. "We saw how the military infrastructure was unfolding, how hundreds of foreign advisers had begun to work there, with the most modern weapons being regularly delivered from NATO countries. The danger was growing every day. Russia offered a preemptive rebuff to the aggression - this was a forced, timely move and the only correct decision, one taken by a strong and independent country," said the President.


"I think he is believing what he wants to believe - a slight shine of desperation. But let me put on the record categorically: NATO, Britain, Eastern Europe is not planning to invade Russia and never have done," said UK Secretary of Defense Ben Wallace in rejection of Putin's statements, standing on the fact that the UK and NATO never had any plans to attack Russia.

In March, the Russian military publicized documents that confirmed Ukraine's preparations for a high offensive operation in the Donbass expected for the same month. Mykola Bala, National Guard of Ukraine commander, emitted an order dating from 22 January 2022, where plans for an offensive in detail were described.

Last February 24, Russia and Donbass allies launched a special military operation in Ukraine intended for the "denazification" and "demilitarization" of the country. The operation came in light of the escalation of tensions between Moscow and NATO and weeks of growing violence in the Donbass by the Ukrainian military against Donetsk and Lugansk People's Militia units and civilians.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/UN- ... -0024.html

Macron: Ukraine’s Accession to the EU Would Take Long

Image
French President said that Ukraine's membership in the EU could take years. May. 9, 2022. | Photo: Twtter/@HugoSoepenberg

Published 9 May 2022

On Monday, the French President commented on the fact that Ukraine's accession to the European Union may take many years.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Monday that he considers Ukraine's elevation to the European Union would take many years.

Macron said that Ukraine is already a member of the European family, saying, "we know that the EU accession process can take many years or even decades." He proposed the creation of a European political community that could accept it into its ranks to speed Ukraine's participation in European affairs.

According to Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, the decision on acceptance for Kiev candidate status will be released in June, adding that the bloc is in await for the second part of Ukraine’s questionnaire on admission.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky ported on his Twitter account that Ukraine officials have already submitted the second part of the questionnaire to Brussels, saying the first part of the document was presented last April 17.


Ukraine's official membership to NATO has some steps to follow: the European Commission's recommendation to the European Council to launch negotiations on admission to the. Further, Ukraine would have to engage European negotiators on a set of conditions or "negotiation chapters" that it must accomplish.

The membership process could take many years; it can even take from years to an indefinitely long period.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Mac ... -0016.html

No Agreement Between Hungary, EU Over Russian Oil Embargo

Image
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen makes a statement on the Ukraine issue in Brussels, Belgium, on Feb. 22, 2022. | Photo: Xinhua/Zheng Huansong

Published 9 May 2022

In its sixth sanction package aimed against Moscow, the EU plans to phase out Russian crude oil within six months and refined products by the end of the year, according to von der Leyen.

But Hungary and other Eastern European countries, whose economies are largely reliant on Russian oil, are not ready yet to accept the sixth sanction package in its current form.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban met with Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission (EC) here on Monday, reaching no agreement yet over the proposed Russian oil embargo.

"This evening's discussion with PM Viktor Orban was helpful to clarify issues related to sanctions and energy security," von der Leyen tweeted following the 90-minute-long working dinner at Orban's residence in the Castle District of the Hungarian capital.

"We made progress, but further work is needed. I will convene a VC (video conference) with regional players to strengthen regional cooperation on oil infrastructure," she added.

An unnamed European Union (EU) source said on Monday that the EC was considering offering funds to landlocked Eastern EU states such as Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic to modernize their oil infrastructure in order to persuade them to accept the Russian oil embargo.

In its sixth sanction package aimed against Moscow, the EU plans to phase out Russian crude oil within six months and refined products by the end of the year, according to von der Leyen.

But Hungary and other Eastern European countries, whose economies are largely reliant on Russian oil, are not ready yet to accept the sixth sanction package in its current form.

"Discussions with the EC president Ursula von der Leyen ended, the topic was of course the next round of sanctions in Brussels and its impact on Hungary and the Hungarian economy," said Peter Szijjarto, the Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade, who also took part at the meeting.

"This round of sanctions in Brussels would cause enormous problems for Hungary if it came into force, because Hungary's energy supply is secure now, but the adoption of this sanctions package would compromise our energy security, because it would be impossible for us to obtain enough oil," Szijjarto said in a video message posted on his Facebook page.

"As long as the EC does not offer a solution to these problems, of course Hungary cannot support this series of sanctions," he said.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/No- ... -0021.html

**********************************************

The head of the DPR announced plans for the future of Mariupol
05/09/2022
There is a task to build a resort city

During a meeting with residents of the city on the occasion of Victory Day, the head of the DPR Denis Pushilin said that Mariupol should be made a resort city, Kommersant writes . The head of the republic noted the negative impact of the metallurgical enterprise on the environment. The climate and geographical location of Mariupol allow the development of the sanatorium and resort industry, but the number and quality of new jobs cannot be compared with those provided by metallurgy.

Image
Mariupol in April 2022 (photo - Reuters)

At a meeting with the residents of Mariupol, Denis Pushilin announced the return of the city to the DPR and shared his plans for the future: “the task is to make Mariupol a resort city, which could not be done before.” Pushilin admitted the possibility that after the termination of the special military operation, the Azovstal metallurgical plant would not be restored. The head of the DPR also recalled the negative impact of the plant's activities on the ecology of the city and coastal waters. According to Wikipedia, Mariupol occupied one of the first places in Ukraine in terms of emissions of harmful substances by industrial enterprises.

Along with the closure of the metallurgical complex in the city, industry-specific vocational schools, such as the Mariupol Higher Metallurgical Vocational School, will no longer be in demand. Collectives of teachers, mentors, foremen will share the fate of the factory workers - they will find themselves "out of the market" of the new Mariupol.

At the moment, after the plant's workshops have become the last refuge of the "defenders" of Mariupol, the scale of destruction and the feasibility of restoration have yet to be assessed. At the same time, Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin visited the Mariupol Ilyich Iron and Steel Works (also partially destroyed) to assess the cost of restoration work.

The construction of the Azovstal plant began during the first five-year plan, in February 1930. In 1933, the plant produced the first product (cast iron). During the Great Patriotic War, the enterprise was completely destroyed by the Germans during their retreat from Mariupol, the equipment was taken to Germany. Soon the plant was rebuilt.

In the 2000s, the plant was taken over by the Ukrainian oligarch Rinat Akhmetov. Before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the plant provided jobs for about ten thousand people, including highly qualified specialists. With the liquidation of the plant, the townspeople will lose a relatively high and stable income compared to earnings in the same tourism industry.

Mariupol is located on the northern shore of the Sea of ​​Azov in a temperate continental climate with a swimming season of more than 120 days, which allows the city to count on a steady influx of tourists, provided that the tourist infrastructure is prepared.

https://www.rotfront.su/glava-dnr-ozvuc ... shhee-mar/

Google Translator

********************************************

Mobilization in Russia and Ukraine. Questions of the real potential of the parties
May 10, 11:49 am

Image

Mobilization in Russia and Ukraine. Questions of the real potential of the parties

• It is often misunderstood on the Internet that in Ukraine, 150,000 Russian and Donetsk-Luhansk troops are fighting 600,000 Ukrainian forces. At the same time, there is no mobilization in Russia, as a fact. Strictly speaking, it is not. In particular, the number of only land "active bayonets" from our side and the total number (including civilian personnel) from Ukraine are compared.

• It is also necessary to assess the scale of mobilization in Russia and Ukraine today, to compare the actual potential.

So:

1. UKRAINE:

By the beginning of the NMD, its troops numbered 209 thousand people in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, 102 thousand - the defense, up to 120-130 thousand (in total) - NGU, GPSU, Special Communications, Special Transport Service, etc. On the circle - 430-440 thousand people.

It is worth noting that this value included civilian personnel (up to 100 thousand people). That is, in general, everyone.

Until April 2022, inclusive, three waves of mobilization - for 60 thousand, 60 thousand and 70 thousand people - 190 thousand people were called up (officially). At the same time, the losses of Ukrainian troops today amount to at least 40-50 thousand military personnel (killed, wounded and captured). They also have a high percentage of desertion: at least 20-30 thousand people.

That is, according to the results of the mob events, they had up to 550 thousand people in the ranks. Including, it is worth repeating again, all. Including numerous rather civilian personnel.

In addition, from May 15, a fourth wave of mobilization is expected, with the help of which it is planned to clean up, according to various sources, another 70 to 100 thousand unlucky people (in total, mobilization will affect 260-290 thousand people by the summer). According to the results, there will be up to 620-650 thousand people in the ranks. In general, everyone.

Of these, active bayonets (that is, those who directly conduct combat operations) will amount to 150 thousand people (25%). Including more or less trained active bayonets as part of well-coordinated units - 60-70 thousand people (10%).

As it was in Russia during the Civil War. Especially at the final stage, when 100,000 of the five million Red Army actually fought, being transferred from front to front.

Accordingly, a high percentage of losses for them, especially among "active bayonets", is fraught with a loss of combat capability.

2. RUSSIA (with LDNR):

Covert mobilization in Russia began, according to some sources, at the beginning of the year. By January 30, at least 85 thousand reservists ("partisans") were called up for training. Reservists were also announced in February. A recruitment of contract soldiers to the troops and PMCs was carried out. Starting from mid-April, according to some sources, at least 60,000 people were recruited.

In total, according to certain estimates, up to 200-250 thousand people were mobilized today, without the LDNR (quite comparable to Ukraine).

Your obedient servant at one time assumed that Russia needed a million fighters for the campaign in Ukraine. Without mobilization at home, subject to mobilization in the LDNR (which we consider), it was possible for us to field up to 700-800 thousand people. Considering everyone in general (as in the case of Ukraine, a single method of calculation is needed).

I'll expand on the thesis. By the time the NWO began, Russia had concentrated 190-200 thousand people on the borders with Ukraine, according to Western estimates. Including mobilized reservists.

The rear - the same civilian personnel, because much was transferred to outsourcing - amounted to 170-200 thousand people. This, it seems, is without the potential of the Aerospace Forces and the Navy: another 70-80 thousand people per circle (without rears). The National Guard numbered up to 60-70 thousand people (without rears), LDNR (after mobilization) - at least 100 thousand (together with rears). Plus the border troops of the FSB.

For a circle, all this amounted - together with the rear and civilian personnel, of course - the notorious 700-800 thousand people. Don't be put off by this huge value. The number of "active bayonets" among these significant digital expressions did not really exceed 120-150 thousand people (half - LDNR).

Additional covert mobilization from February to May, and the accompanying growth in the rear, turned out to be able to bring the number of Russian and LDNR forces on the border to almost a million people. At the same time, the number of "active bayonets" is unlikely to have grown significantly: no more than 150-200 thousand people today.

It should be noted that today growth is in the line of building up the capacity of existing OShS (organizational staff structures). Presumably, it may include the following successive stages (thanks to https://maximlubyanov.livejournal.com/ for the tip):

• Increase in the number of people in the departments (from 6-7 to 11-13 people), the introduction of the fourth department in platoons. It is capable of leading, taking into account the shortage that took place by the beginning of the SVO, to no less than doubling the number of "active bayonets" (that is, by 150 thousand people compared to the initial values);

• Introduction of the fourth platoon into companies (taking into account the previous stage, the number of companies is increased to 200-250 people). Able to give another 70-80 thousand people (only active bayonets);

• The introduction of the fourth company into the battalion (growth of the battalion to 1000 people), the disbandment of the BTG (withdrawal of artillery and tanks back to regimental-brigade-divisional subordination), the introduction of the third battalion (meaning, directly operating forces on the theater of operations). Able to give another 70-80 thousand people. At the same time, brigades again become brigades (for 5-6 thousand people), divisions - divisions (depending on the composition of the division - 15-25 thousand people).

Taking into account the recruitment of civilian personnel and others, it seems possible, after passing through the indicated stages, to increase the potential of the RF Armed Forces to 1.5 million people. Including 400-500 thousand - active bayonets.

Taking into account the estimated potential for creating an army of Greater Novorossiya of half a million people, it is seen the possibility of forming a two-million-strong detachment of forces from Russia for operations in Ukraine. More than enough, given the existing balance of power.

True, given the pace, this is probably good if by the fall.

(c) Ilya Topchy

https://schneider-krieg.livejournal.com/54331.html - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/7606617.html

Google Translator

*****************************************************************

Image

Russia Marks 77th Victory Day with Military Parade in Moscow’s Red Square & Speech by President Putin
May 9, 2022

A military parade took place in Moscow’s iconic Red Square on Monday, as Russia marked the 77th anniversary of the victory over Nazi Germany and its allies in World War II.

This year, 11,000 soldiers and over 100 armored vehicles took part in the event, including troops who came from the combat zone in Donbass.

The Red Army’s fight against Nazi troops is known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia, and May 9 is one of the country’s most revered holidays.


The parade of military equipment, which included a total of 131 vehicles, was led by the iconic Soviet T-34-85 tank, which was used extensively in World War II. Next came Typhoon armored vehicles with remote-controlled combat modules, new-generation BMP-2, BMP-3, and Kurganets-25 infantry fighting vehicles, as well as T-72B3M, T-90M, and T-90M tanks, and the T-14 Armata battle tank.

Image
The T-34-85 tank during the military parade on Red Square, Moscow, on May 9, 2022. Photo: The Russian Ministry of Defense.

In addition, units of Tor-M2 and Buk-M3 anti-aircraft missile systems, the Iskander-M mobile short-range ballistic missile system, the Tornado-G multiple rocket-launcher system, the S-400 anti-aircraft defense system, and the RS-24 Yars, a MIRV-equipped, thermonuclear armed intercontinental ballistic missile, participated in the military parade.



Image
The T-14 Armata tank. Photo: Sputnik.

Image
T-72B3M tanks. Photo: Sputnik.

Among other equipment, the passage of the BTR-MDM Rakushka amphibious tanks, BMD-4M armored vehicles, as well as the Urán-9 tracked unmanned combat ground vehicles stood out.

Image
Autonomous launcher of the Yars intercontinental ballistic missile. Photo: Sputnik.

Image
Urán-9 tracked unmanned combat ground vehicle. Photo: Sputnik.

In Russia, the period of the Second World War, which began with the Nazi invasion of the USSR on June 22, 1941, and lasted until the fall of Berlin and the capitulation of Germany on May 9, 1945, is called the “Great Patriotic War.” It is estimated that more than 26 million Soviets lost their lives in those four years of conflict against Nazi Germany, until the Russian campaign expelled the Nazis from Russia and half of Europe.

(The speech follows but we've seen enough of that...go to link.)

https://orinocotribune.com/russia-marks ... ent-putin/

Image

Fighting Nazism in Ukraine and the West’s Standoff with Russia
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on MAY 7, 2022
*Mikhail Noskov

Image
Far-right activists march through the streets of Kiev in torch-lit processions on the occasion of Stepan Bandera’s birthday, January 2022

In just a few days comes the 77th anniversary of the decisive victory over Nazi Germany in World War II in which the Soviet Union played a pivotal role. This is a reminder to all of those – first and foremost in the West – who for far too long have been indulging in historical revisionism trying to play down the Soviet soldier’s heroism in putting an end to the Nazi death machine. The Great Patriotic War – a term used in Russia to refer to the bloodiest conflict in the history of mankind – raged between June 1941 and May 1945 and took, as you know, a drastic toll on the Soviet people with a number of 27 million deaths.

Clearly, Russia doesn’t forget about large arms, raw materials, food and military equipment supplies to the Soviet Union sent by the Allies. We appreciate Iceland’s participation in organizing the Arctic convoys for lend-lease aid to the Soviet Union that started off in August 1941.

However, what is indisputable is that it was the Red Army that took most of the hardship in combating Nazism in Europe. There is almost no family in Russia that wasn’t suffered in the Great Patriotic War. Therefore, it’s in our DNA that the people of Russia find the hateful Nazi ideology completely intolerable.

Over the decades, the memory of the Nazis atrocities and crimes against humanity during World War II remained a powerful tool hindering the spread of their hideous ideas across the globe. Now, as painful as it must be to admit, those ideas seem to have re-emerged in Ukraine’s current political landscape – and that happened in a country whose people together with other peoples of the USSR fought against Nazi Germany during the Great Patriotic War.

The ultra-right groups in modern Ukraine who, with officials turning a blind eye to them or even approving of their deeds, have long been promoting Nazi ideology and anti-Russian sentiment, “russophobia”, among our brothers. To that end, chief Ukrainian nationalists such as Symon Petliura, Stepan Bandera, Yevhen Konovalets, Roman Shukhevych, Yaroslav Stestsko and Andriy Melnyk have been insistently praised as new “moral beacons.” Ukraine at the state level has been honoring these so-called “war heroes” since 2014. On October 14, they celebrate the so called “Day of Defenders and Defendresses of Ukraine” coinciding with the founding day of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army which in World War II sided with Nazi Germany. On this day, far-right activists march through the streets of Kiev and other Ukrainian cities in torch-lit processions bearing hostile, primarily russophobic, banners.

The first legislative initiatives of the Kiev regime that came to power in 2014 backed by radical neo-Nazi groups were aimed at restricting the rights of the Russian-speaking people in south-eastern Ukraine discriminating them on the ethnicity and language grounds.

A question we’ve been asked a lot is how many Russian-speaking people are there in Ukraine? Most of the numbers given by Ukrainian pollsters are inadequate and have been obtained under pressure. Feared of physical assaults by neo-Nazis, many Ukrainians didn’t tell the truth. Yet, even those polls estimated Ukrainian citizens who consider Russian as their mother tongue at 35–40% while those who speak Russian in their day-to-day life at over 65%. Meanwhile, a most interesting take on the matter was provided by a 2013 Gallup poll when participants were mailed letters with two questionnaires – one in Russian and the other in Ukrainian. The questions in their own right turned out irrelevant while what mattered was which questionnaire – Russian or Ukrainian – people filled in. 83% of respondents picked the Russian one.

Cancelling the law making Russian a regional language in Ukraine, ban of the Russian television channels, persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and independent media sparked mass protests and large-scale rallies in Dnepropetrovsk, Donetsk, Lugansk, Kharkov, Odessa, and other cities where people consider Russian their mother tongue.

Several punitive actions were taken against dissenters. In Kharkov, Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk and some other cities, dozens of activists from pro-Russian movements were exterminated. More recently, threats against the opposition have been followed by sanctions imposed by the Ukrainian authorities against their own people.

Concurrently, the most favorable environment was created to promote the rise of neo-Nazi paramilitary units, such as the “Azov”, “Aidar”, and “Tornado” battalions, among others. Incidentally, Ukraine is the only OSCE member in which Nazi units are incorporated into the security forces. The “Azov” battalion, which is part of Ukraine’s National Guard, wears the symbols of Hitler’s Nazi party and some SS units as insignia with the Ukrainian authorities doing nothing to stop that.

Since 2014 the Ukrainian policies have been strongly influenced by revisionism pursued by authorities that came to power following a coup basically backed by certain Western countries. Their overtures with nationalist groups have spiraled into militant “russophobia“, nationalism and xenophobiacultivated in the younger generation and public glorification of the “national liberation movement” members who in reality collaborated with the Nazis and killed and sent thousands of people, including Ukrainians, to death camps.

There are numerous documented human rights violations and war crimes by the Kiev regime. Since 2014, the Russian Investigative Committee has launched about 800 criminal cases concerning the tragic incidents in Donbass and Ukraine which involved high-ranking military and political leaders.

Throughout the past eight years, people in Donbass have been violently abused – killed, crippled, tortured. Their homes have been continuously shelled, using artillery and aviation among other weapons.

Those people had no choice but to stand up to defend their homes. Former miners, workers, teachers, and doctors took up arms and entered into an unequal battle with the Ukrainian military units, which included the so-called “punitive battalions” consisting of neo-Nazis and ultranationalists.

On February 11–12, 2015 Minsk hosted a summit that welcomed the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, France, and Germany. The high-ranking meeting resulted in a set of provisions needed to implement the Minsk agreements aimed at resolving the ongoing Ukrainian crisis. Ukraine and the Donbass Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk (DPR and LPR) made a commitment to cease fire and withdraw their forces from the contact line. Ukraine was also supposed to adopt a law granting the special status to certain areas of Donetsk and Lugansk regions and run local elections there taking into account the position of the DPR and LPR officials.

An OSCE monitoring mission was to report on the developments in Ukraine (including the parties fulfillment of the agreements). From that point, it confirmed hundreds of thousands ceasefire violations on the Ukrainian part. On April 14, 2014 – December 31, 2021 the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) confirmed over 14,000 deaths including at least 152 children. A memorial for those children known as “Alley of Angels” was erected in Donetsk on June 1, 2015.

During the years of the conflict Russia, not being a party to it, did everything it possibly could to have the Minsk agreements fully implemented, as soon as them being the only real alternative to the military scenario. Yet, every year it was getting clearer and clearer that officials in Kiev didn’t plan on taking any action to stop the long-lasting suffering of the Donbass people. And that was happening with the West silent approval, looking to make Ukraine the “anti-Russia” and stir up hatred between our nations.

Kiev anti-Russian policy, indulging neo-Nazis, incapability to prevent their atrocities against the civilians living in Donbass, undermining the Minsk agreements and as a result the reality of the security threats for Russia itself taking into account the active “mastering” of the Ukrainian territory by the NATO member-states as well as officially announced intentions to neglect the non-nuclear status of Ukraine led to the official recognition of the DPR and the LPR as independent states on February 21, 2022 by the Russian leadership. On February 24, 2022, in accordance with Article 51, Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, with the approval of the Upper Chamber of the Russian Parliament and at the request of the leaders of DPR and LPR, the Russian Federation launched a special military operation on demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, aimed at protecting people of Donbass(it’s worth mentioning that hundreds of thousands of them have Russian citizenship) and eliminating threats to Russia’s security.

Regretfully, most Western countries, including Iceland, simply didn’t mention or pretended not to mention the fact that Ukraine had been consistently preparing to execute a forceful scenario. A massive ground offensive against Donbass that would escalate into an attack against Russia’s Crimea was just a matter of time. Documents obtained by Russian military during the special operation confirm just that.

Besides, there have been revealed the facts proving that the Kiev regime tried to cover up the traces ofa military biological program run by Ukraine and funded by the US Department of Defense. On February 24, the day the Russian military special operation started, Kiev tried to urgently destroy particularly dangerous pathogens of plague, anthrax, tularemia, cholera and other deadly diseases in those biolaboratories. This makes anyone, even the one not being an expert in bio-weapons, assume that in the immediate vicinity of Russia, Ukraine developed military biological components. On March 24, Russia submitted to the UN Security Council the evidence of the Kiev’s criminal activities involving production of biological weapons in Ukraine.

These embarrassing findings have not gained the attention they deserve in the Western media. In Russia, it is no longer a surprise how the West overlooks everything that does not fit into the meticulously shaped image of the Ukrainian “defenders of freedom and democracy”. After all, in the West one cannot admit that these “heroes”, as they are portrayed by their policymakers, would be capable of killing their own people, targeting residential areas with heavy artillery, planting mines there and using civilians as human shields. As they would never torture or execute captured and unarmed Russian soldiers, stage provocations to discredit Russian military, carry out punitive raids against civilians with so-called “territorial defense units” and other forms of violence against civilians. Nor would they prepare terrorist acts to get rid of prominent Russian journalists. The crimes committed by the Ukrainian side are silenced down. As it was with their attacks on Donetsk and Kramatorsk with Tochka-U tactical missiles, which resulted in numerous civilian losses. This is why the existence of neo-Nazi groups openly operating across Ukraine and the facts of genocide against people of Donbass have been denied.

Instead, since the very first days of Russia’s special operation in Ukraine, Western countries have declared an unprecedented information war on Russia, with fake news as its main instrument. Every day, false and misleading interpretations of military forces Russia and the republics of Donbass motives and actions dominate the public space. The Western global media also relentlessly maintain the level of anti-Russian hype publishing stories featuring staged provocations.

The examples of such hoaxes are well-known. The “living dead” from Snake Island (who did not die, but voluntarily surrendered to Russian troops), the airstrike on a maternity hospital in Mariupol, in which, as it turned out later, a Ukrainian model and blogger played the role of “a victim”, the orchestrated provocation about the alleged killing of civilians by Russian servicemen in Bucha, just outside Kiev, and other examples of “blatant cruelty” of Russians aimed at discrediting the image of our country.

Meanwhile, reports exposing Kiev’s fake stories are blocked for allegedly being unreliable. Given these circumstances, people are deprived of the possibility to have an objective and unbiased coverage on that is going on in Ukraine. In fact, Western countries have completely blocked themselves from alternative points of view, which is contrary to their declared fundamental ideals of freedom of speech.

However, in this particular situation it makes no sense in appealing to such ideals. No politician in the West is going to consider them when the goal is to take advantage of Ukraine to undermine Russia. This plan has long been in the making. That is exactly why the US and NATO turned down a discussion on legally binding security guarantees put forward by Russia in December 2021. That is why Western partners of the current Kiev regime continue supplying it with weapons and military equipment in an effort to drag on Russia’s special operation and prevent peace in Ukraine.

Beside media clashes, economic sanctions are the second weapon of choice used by “Western democracies” against unwelcome states. Western countries are convinced that their chosen policy of strangling the Russian economy is the right one, turning a blind eye to the inevitable losses suffered by their own people. One shouldn’t forget that the unlawful sanctions imposed by the West against Russia are a double-edged sword, and those who are responsible for these sanctions have already been facing the implications of their actions. In March, the average inflation rate in the EU reached 7.5%, with food prices rising by 5% and energy prices by almost 45%. This rapid increase has already been compared to what happened in Europe during the 1973 world energy crisis.

The desire to put pressure on Russia and unleash the “russophobia” that has been building up over the years prevails over common sense and makes it impossible to accept the fact that the so-called “measures of influence” on our country – blatant anti-Russian propaganda, sanctions and suspension of cooperation in virtually all areas – are not paying off. I am positive that, sooner or later, Western leaders will come to realize that without proper cooperation and respect for the Russian interests, the today world cannot exist.

No one can “cancel” Russia considering its cultural, economic, scientific and political influence too strong to be neglected. Our country will thrive on the pressure as it always did throughout its history. Russia is rich not only in natural resources, but also in talented, dedicated people who are ready to make every effort to develop their country and move it forward.

As for the goals and objectives of Russia’s special military operation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine, they will certainly be achieved despite large-scale arms and military equipment supplies provided by NATO to the Kiev regime. Threats to Russia’s security from Ukraine will be eliminated.

*Russian Ambassador to Iceland

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2022/05/ ... th-russia/

**********************************

Image

Andrei Biletsky, the neo-Nazi father of Azov
Originally published: Donbass-Insider on May 9, 2022 by Laurent Brayard (more by Donbass-Insider) (Posted May 10, 2022)

The supreme heroes of the West are the mostly neo-Nazi soldiers of the Azov regiment. These heroes, who smell of sulphur and swastikas, the Western journalists do not want to hear about them, they are only heroic fighters of the free and democratic Ukraine, a fabulous country where life was good before the Russian special operation. To counter this low propaganda broadcast by all the French public or even private media, it is necessary to understand who are the men behind this Azov regiment and first of all, their founder, whose story alone speaks for itself. The truth will come out, sooner or later, and all attempts to hide the thousands of Ukrainian neo-Nazi volunteers are doomed to failure. It was the same with the famous biological weapons that Iraq was supposed to have, and this lie was even attempted against Syria a few years later. Today, French and European journalists are painting a dream picture of this iconic unit, which, let’s remember, was just one of many of its kind, the infamous retaliation battalions, that horribly illustrated themselves in eastern Ukraine and the Donbass, starting in 2014. So who is Andrei Biletsky, the founder of Azov?

From neo-Nazi militias and ratonades to racial cleansing of populations. Born in 1979 into an ordinary family, Biletsky had followed a university career as a history student. He had worked on a thesis on the Ukrainian army of collaboration with Nazi Germany, the UPA, which flew the black and red flag and the ultranationalist trident. It should be remembered that it was noted for the abominable massacres of the summer of 1944 in Volhynia (between 80 and 200,000 Poles massacred). After successfully defending his thesis, he worked as a teacher at the University of Kharkov (early 2000s), having been active in neo-Nazi and ultra-nationalist groups for a long time in his youth. This led him to support the Serbian cause against Kosovo, not out of Slavic solidarity, but to “defend the supremacy of the white race” and against the “Islamisation of Europe”. He soon joined the Ukrainian National Socialist Party (2003, now renamed Svoboda), and founded a paramilitary organisation called Patriot Ukraine. This group, transformed into a militia, took part in hit actions, outside of any legality, to “clean up the cities of Ukraine of trafficking, tackle drug trafficking, migrants and undocumented migrants” (2005-2010). During these activities of beatings, undeclared demonstrations, and actions defined as “civic disobedience”, Biletsky was arrested for the first time in a direct confrontation with the police (18 September 2008).

The ideas advocated by this sulphurous character are well known, so much so that it is difficult to believe that the West can hide their content. In addition to the supremacy of the white race, Biletsky claimed to defend the West, to want the destruction of democracy in Europe, the destruction of capitalism and of the “Zionist international”, which would be replaced by “Nazocracy”, which are his own words. As a historian, Biletsky, in addition to the conspiracy theory that was very much a part of his rhetoric, was also committed to revisionism, rewriting the history of the Ukrainian people, whose roots, according to him, lay in the Scythian civilisation, which he linked to the Cossacks, in an attempt to erase the real origin of the Kiev Rus’. Going much further than the Nazis, he went so far as to declare that the latter had not taken into account the need to racially cleanse the population, including the Aryan population, in order to eradicate degenerate subjects, such as alcoholism, drug addiction and others. His idea was to take into account “the biological character of each family”. Going much further than American eugenics, he proposed the total and literal cleansing of the race, stating that the Ukrainian national culture was derived from the people, not from their history, religion, heritage, or language. He even declared that “the historical mission of the Ukrainian nation at this critical moment is to lead the white peoples of the world in the last crusade for its existence, and to fight against the sub-humanity led by the Semites”.

From the ultranationalist vendetta to the anarchy of Maidan. Its verbal and ideological violence only increased, until the arrest of the main leaders of its militia (August 2011), due to a shoot-out between its members (notably a certain Sergei Kolesnik). The ideological dispute turned into a fierce vendetta, and he was seriously wounded by a henchman of his group, who shot him several times with a revolver (19 November). In response, he organized an attack on the dissident group, and was arrested for assaulting Kolesnik, and sentenced to two months in prison (December 2011). His imprisonment led to a campaign of political agitation and demonstrations, crying political repression in several Ukrainian cities (Kiev, Kharkov, Lvov, Zhitomir, etc.) which led to the arrest and conviction of many activists for attempted murder, assault and robbery. The launching of the Maïdan operation by the American CIA gave him the chance to show his mettle and to finally emerge from the shadows and the sinister neo-Nazi agitations. The success of this colorful revolution had as a direct consequence, a law of the Rada of Ukraine, which pardoned all the members of his group, considered from then on as “political prisoners” having undergone the repressions of the pro-Russian regime in Kiev (February 2014). Highly visible, he became a member of the ultranationalist and neo-Nazi party Pravy Sektor (March) and was appointed head of the regions of Kharkov, Donetsk, Lugansk and Poltava (12 March). At the same time, his good services were recognized and he obtained an important position in the Ukrainian Ministry of the Interior, with extended powers. It is easy to imagine the terrible repressions that took place under his aegis in the regions under his control.

From the Azov regimental command to the seat of deputy. It was then that the Azov Battalion was formed, mainly with members of the Pravy Sektor party, soon reinforced by neo-Nazis from all over Europe (including the French). Under his leadership the battalion took part in the Mariupol massacre (9 May 2014), and the ensuing massacres, rackets, kidnappings and political repressions up to and including assassinations. For this operation, President Poroshenko did not hesitate to decorate him with the “order for courage” (2 August), then with the rank of lieutenant-colonel and head of the Azov battalion (18 September). However, his extremism worried the liberal fringe, but despite political pressure to oust him, he ran as an independent candidate in the Rada elections and was soon elected (26 October). Now a member of parliament, he was integrated into the Commission for National Security and Defense, and was mostly absent from the Rada benches… having participated in only 2% of the votes during his mandate! The little he presented as bills, ended up in the dustbin of history, his ideology going too far, and clashing with the capitalist social-democratic oligarchs in power in Ukraine.

He attempted a power grab, declaring that President Poroshenko was preparing a crackdown on Ukrainian ‘patriots’ and organized a ‘day of rage’ (9 March 2019). He also tried to expose the corruption of the oligarchs, saying he was ready to publish documents implicating the highest state officials (11 March). He was soon trapped by the SBU’s political police, notably through phone tapping that implicated him in the illegal purchase of a point weapon, or the denunciation of the beating of opponents and troublemakers within the Azov regiment. Discredited and very cumbersome for Ukraine, anxious to get rid of such a standard-bearer, he nevertheless tried to get re-elected to his seat, in the ranks of the National Socialist Party of Ukraine (Svoboda), but could not succeed and became a simple citizen (August 2019). Subsequently, Biletsky became an opponent of the Zelensky regime, organising demonstrations ‘against the capitulards’, including in front of his house, and that the Ukrainian president ‘could not be a spokesman for the national interests of the Ukrainian people» (It should be remembered that antisemitic ideology is an essential backbone of Pravy Sektor). It protested even more virulently during the evacuation by Ukrainian troops of a village in the Lugansk region (October), and then gradually disappeared from the political scene.

Three million dollars for his silence. Since then, his Azov friends have remained what they are… and are still serving in the ranks of that regiment. Some have already been killed by the Russians, the rest will soon be taken in the coming surrender. Those who have been taken prisoner are systematically exposed on social networks. It’s always the same story, talking tattoos, memorabilia to the glory of Nazi Germany and the “heroes of Ukraine”, as well as phones full of pictures that deceive no one. Biletsky, since then, has been washed clean by a discreet and virtual disappearance of the worst information on the Internet. A skilful job by Western and Ukrainian services has eliminated the character’s visibility. But enough remains to understand (especially in Russian). The question of his current fate has inflamed Russia, on the issue of the geolocation of the famous Ukrainian neo-Nazi. He is indeed under the law, both for his activities during the Maidan, as a figure of neo-Nazism in Ukraine and for the Mariupol massacre and the abuses during the ATO operation. However, he appeared on social media to make various irrelevant (and hostile to Zelensky) statements, and when asked about this, the head of the Azov regiment said he was not on the battlefront… but on the political front. However, Russians believe that he has already fled abroad. This is interesting because Ukraine has no interest in him being caught by Russia. His exfiltration from Ukraine therefore seems very plausible. Yesterday an article appeared which revealed that Biletsky has made a deal with President Zelensky, the terms of which are a payment of three million dollars for the silence of the former MP and the neo-Nazis of the Azov Regiment, as well as a helicopter to evacuate the current head of the regiment, Denis Prokopenko. Criticism of the former Azov leader has effectively fallen silent for about 15 days. Prokopenko gave an interview published today, it is unlikely that he will be able to leave the Azovstal ruins alive… except as a prisoner of Russia.

https://mronline.org/2022/05/10/andrei- ... r-of-azov/

****************************************

Ukrainian news outlet suggests UK and US governments are primary obstacles to peace

Recent media reports indicate that the West pressured Ukraine to stop the ongoing negotiations with Russia, which led to the collapse of the talks being held in Istanbul

May 09, 2022 by Abdul Rahman

Image
Boris Johnson made a surprise visit to Ukraine in April, during which he allegedly discouraged Zelensky from pursuing peace talks in Turkey. Photo: Boris Johnson

A recent report in Ukrainian news outlet Ukrayinska Pravda, quoting officials from the Ukrainian president’s office, claimed that talks between Ukraine and Russia have stopped due to pressure exerted by UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson during his unannounced visit to Kiev on April 9.

According to the report, Johnson came to Kiev on a surprise visit apparently to “express solidarity” and announce financial and military aid to Ukraine in its fight against Russian aggression. However, during his meeting with Zelensky, Johnson asked him not to continue with the talks which were going on in Turkey, asserting that Putin needs to be defeated.

Zelensky’s public position on talks with Russia shifted dramatically following this visit. Only a few days prior to the visit, Zelensky had proclaimed that there is no alternative to talks with Russia. He had declared the necessity of the talks even amidst the international outcry over the alleged mass killings in Bucha.

During the last physical round of talks between both the countries in Istanbul in late March, Russia had claimed that Ukraine was ready to consider its demand of Ukrainian neutrality. The Russians had also said there were talks of a possible meeting between Zelensky and Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Russia had earlier alleged that the talks were stalled due to Western pressure. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov alleged in late April that Ukraine had taken the decision to stall the talks on the advice of “American and British colleagues”. Putin had announced “deadlock” in the talks and said that the West, instead of finding a solution to the conflict, has been aiding the war with the objective of prolonging it at the cost of the Ukrainian people.

Consistent NATO backing through arms supplies has also led to the hardening of Zelensky’s public stand on the talks. On Friday, he proclaimed that talks with Russia will only resume after Russian troops withdraw from Ukraine completely and “return” all those Ukrainians who have been evacuated to Russia.

Russia claims to have evacuated more than 19,800 people from the Donbass republics. It also claimed that Ukrainian forces tried to block the evacuation. Russia has evacuated more than 1.1 million people from Ukraine since the beginning of its “special operation” on February 24, Tass reported.

Russia has already announced that it will not halt its offensive for the talks and that Ukrainian commitment of neutrality will be necessary for any meaningful talks.

A proxy war

Russian allegations of a proxy war have been echoed by several anti-war groups. On May 7, the UK-based Stop the War Campaign observed an “international day of action for peace in Ukraine” demanding immediate resumption of talks between the parties.

In a statement on Friday, the campaign’s convenor Lindsey German asserted that “the British government has become an obstacle to peace in Ukraine by encouraging the continuation of the war through huge arms shipments and incendiary rhetoric.” She said that the conflict in Ukraine is “developing into a proxy war between Russia and NATO,” which will have implications for Ukrainian people, Common Dreams reported.

Similar positions have also been taken by anti-war group CODEPINK in the US, which has questioned the Biden administration’s funding to Ukraine and the lack of initiatives for peace. It also termed the war in Ukraine a “proxy war”.

The US and its NATO allies have expressed that the objective behind their military and financial aid to Ukraine is to see that Russia is defeated. In a video conference with Zelensky on Sunday, May 8, the G7 countries – all NATO members except Japan – pledged “coordinated sanctions” against Russia. They also talked about phasing out their dependency on Russian energy and breaking all existing global links of Russian banks.

In a joint statement post the meeting, the G7 countries vowed to never let Russia “win the war against Ukraine” and promised further military aid to it. They claimed that USD 24 billion has already been provided/pledged to Ukraine by the international community.

The UK promised fresh aid of USD 1.6 billion on Saturday, taking its total aid to above USD 3 billion. Johnson had announced billion dollars in aid during his April 9 visit.

The US alone has provided weapons worth USD 4 billion to Ukraine. The Biden administration is seeking an additional aid of USD 33 billion for Ukraine in the US Congress, of which USD 20 billion would be for weapons and military aid.

The US and its NATO allies have already imposed various rounds of political and economic sanctions on Russia. On Sunday, the US announced additional sanctions on Russian media and banks. NATO members have promised more sanctions against Russia in future.

As per a Xinhua report, instead of encouraging the two sides to overcome difficulties and keep talks ongoing to bring about “peaceful outcomes”, the US and its allies have gone “on to fan the flames, magnify regional conflict and fish in troubled waters”, risking the lives of millions for their own narrow interests.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2022/05/09/ ... -to-peace/

Johnson is just the US's dog. Contrary to the nonstop propaganda this ain't 'Putin's war', it is Joe Biden's war and all the phony 'peacniks' that vote for the supposed 'lesser of two evils' need take a good hard look at themselves. If you front for the owning class you are evil.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply