Sympathy for the Devils...

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Wed Jan 27, 2021 2:58 pm

Biden Would Like You to Forget His Enthusiastic Support for Ethnic Cleansing, Mass Murder, Islamic Terrorists and War Criminals
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JANUARY 26, 2021
Jeremy Kuzmarov

Image
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden (L) is welcomed by Kosovo's Prime Minister Hashim Thaci.With Friends Like These… Biden embraces Kosovo’s former Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi. Reports linked Thaçi to human organ smuggling and organized crime. In 1997, Thaçi was convicted of terrorism and sentenced to ten years in prison. In 2020, he had to cancel a trip to Washington because he was indicted by the Hague for war crimes and crimes against humanity. [Source: abc.net.au]

Part III in our Series on Joe Biden’s foreign policy positions through the years: The Balkans
Part I, https://covertactionmagazine.com/2021/0 ... residency/
Part II, https://covertactionmagazine.com/2021/0 ... n-of-iraq/

In his 2008 memoir, Promises to Keep, then Democratic Party presidential candidate Joe Biden touted his leadership on the Balkan conflict as one of his two proudest moments in public life. He pushed a reluctant Clinton administration to arm Bosnian Muslims in the early 1990s and to use air power to suppress conflict in Serbia and Kosovo.[1]

Biden reiterated the same theme in a January 2020 interview with NBC, telling Lester Holt: “Look, I’m the guy that started the effort to make sure we took down the guy who was engaged in genocide in the Balkans: Slobodan Milošević.”[2]

But was there really a genocide in the Balkans led by Milošević and was Biden’s involvement in the conflict really something to be proud about?

Another War Supported by Liberals

The Balkan Wars are overshadowed by wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam as examples of misguided military intervention—or are considered a positive display of U.S. power.

The list of liberal luminaries who supported the Balkan wars included: Todd Gitlin, Susan Sontag, Vaclav Havel, Elie Wiesel, Bernie Sanders, Paul Wellstone, Michael Waltzer, and Christopher Hitchens.

Biden wrote in Promises to Keep that Bosnia was for him a “crucible” which
changed his mind about the military. I came to the Senate trying to stop the Vietnam War. Like a lot of my generation, when we thought [about the] military, we thought [about] Dr. Strangelove—Slim Pickens riding on a bomber, Generals using helicopters to go to lunch at the River Gauche. That was the image, but if you ask me today to go back and pick the 20 brightest, most informed individuals I’ve worked with in government, twelve would be military.[3]
The shifting attitude that Biden personified was predicated in part on the military’s development of new technologies that ensured greater surgical precision in bombing—at least in the popular impression—and which enabled operations to be carried out without any U.S. casualties, coupled with the framing of wars as necessary to halt ethnic cleansing and genocide.

President Bill Clinton at the time was looking for a war that could redeem the nation’s honor and revitalize the legitimacy of U.S. military power after Vietnam. According to a friend, Clinton would lament that “the generation before him was able to serve in a war [World War II] with a plainly noble purpose, and felt ‘almost cheated’ that ‘when it was his turn he didn’t have the chance to be part of a moral cause.’”[4]

The moral cause that Clinton and Biden embraced, unfortunately, was a pyrrhic one based on the delusion that the Bosnian Muslims—whom the U.S. allied with—were striving for a multicultural society, and that the Serbs were heirs to the Nazis.

CovertAction Magazine (see Diana Johnstone’s article “Seeing Yugoslavia Through a Dark Glass” in our CovertAction Quarterly back-issue) pointed out at the time that the Balkan War was as atrocious as any war in U.S. history—it was rooted in false pretexts, helped intensify ethnic cleansing, and led to the breakup of the Yugoslav federation, which Biden later adopted as a model for dividing Iraq along ethnic lines.

In a speech before the Senate on December 13, 1995, Biden denounced Serb leaders Ratko Mladić and Radovan Karadžić, along with Milošević, as war criminals who he said were “no better than Himmler and Goebbels [infamous Nazi leaders].”[5]

This latter assessment was contradicted by intelligence reports which pointed to atrocities on all sides of the conflict and exoneration of Milošević on charges of genocide before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY).

The worst act of ethnic cleansing in the war was carried out not by the Serbs but by Croat forces allied with the United States in Operation Storm, which was planned with the assistance of a U.S. mercenary company, Military Professional Resources, Inc. (MPRI).

MPRI helped the Croat army to implement an “air, land and battle doctrine” and provided real time-coded and pictorial information from U.S. reconnaissance satellites over Krajina to Croat commanders. It also trained units directly implicated in war crimes.[6]

Serb victims later sued MPRI for complicity in genocide, stating that the company was aware of the pro-Nazi sentiments of Croat leader Franjo Tudjman and his henchmen and that “there could be no doubt of what the training and armaments that MPRI was going to provide.”[7]

The other main U.S. allies were the Bosnian Muslims, whose soldiers were known for chopping off the heads of Serb fighters that they had killed.[8]

Bosnian Muslim leader Alija Izetbegović had been arrested for his activities in World War II when he allegedly recruited young Muslims for a military unit organized by the SS Gestapo. A manifesto that he wrote called for “Islamic renewal” and declared: “There can be no peace or coexistence between the Islamic faith and non-Islamic social and political institutions…. the state should be an expression of religion and should support its moral concepts.”[9]

The Muslim fighting regiments backed by the U.S. were bolstered by 4,000 Arab jihadist fighters from Afghanistan, Algeria and other Islamic countries.[10]

Some were recruited through the Al-Kiffah Islamic center in Brooklyn, New York, which was managed by Omar Abdel-Rahman, the infamous “Blind Sheikh” who played a key role in the February 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

Two of the participants in fighting against the Serbs, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mindhar, became 9/11 hijackers, according to the 9/11 Commission report.[11

Despite being blamed by Biden and others for starting the war, the Serbs were the main group that was trying to keep Yugoslavia together as a nation. They further supported two diplomatic settlements (the 1992 Lisbon Plan and 1993 Vance-Owen Plan), which were rejected by the U.S.[12]

Origins of the War and U.S. Motives

Yugoslavia had first begun to unravel after the death of Socialist Marshal Josep Broz Tito, who ruled it from 1953 to 1980; a golden era in which quality-of-life indicators were high. While joining with the non-aligned movement, Yugoslavia’s annual GDP growth averaged 6.1% under Tito, medical care was free, the literacy rate was about 91% and life expectancy was 72 years.[13]

After Tito’s death, cconomic austerity and privatization imposed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) enhanced social inequality and led to a collapse in industrial productivity and living standards, creating the conditions which exacerbated ethnic rivalries, and resulted in national disintegration and war.[14] By 1990, independence movements arose in the provinces of Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina (Bosnia), which the U.S. and others particularly Germany were intent on exploiting for their advantage.[15]
During the 1980s, the Reagan administration targeted the Yugoslav economy in a secret memo, NSDD 133, which advocated expanded efforts to promote a “quiet revolution to overthrow Communist governments and parties” while “reintegrating the countries of Eastern Europe into a market-oriented economy.”[16]
While the war formally started in June 1991, after Slovenia and Croatia announced their independence, this strategy was continued through the Clinton era when the United States supported the secessionist movements and imposed sanctions combined with a devastating economic blockade on Yugoslavia—even though the World Court ruled that Serbia was not the aggressor in Bosnia.[17]

The Yugoslav army, dominated by Serbs, tried to put down the secessionist rebellions and occupied Croatia. The fledgling Croat army struck back by driving out two-thirds of the Serbs from the capital of Zagreb and torturing and raping Serbs in cities like Vukovar.[18]

On October 14, 1991, Muslim and Croat legislators in Bosnia announced their secession from Yugoslavia. Radovan Karadžić, a psychiatrist who considered himself the greatest Serb leader since Karadjordje (AKA “Black George”), who had led a Serb uprising against the Ottoman Turks in 1804, subsequently declared an independent Serb Republic of Srpska.[19]

The Bosnian Muslim army—which fought primarily against the Serbs—was helped by U.S. Special Forces advisers, and wore U.S. military uniforms supplied by U.S. military contractors.[20]

U.S. Special Forces also trained the Albanian-dominated Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in the effort to unseat Milošević, who was considered a relic of a bygone era as the last socialist leader in Europe.

A key purpose underlying U.S. military intervention in the Balkans was to justify the existence of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) following the end of the Cold War and to begin to facilitate its expansion into Eastern Europe, for which Biden was a strong proponent.[21]

In 1999, at the time of the Kosovo war, President Bill Clinton began promoting the Southeast European Trade Initiative, which eliminated tariffs on a host of imports from the Balkans, with the exception of Serbia under Milošević who was resistant.[22]

The U.S. succeeded further in expanding its network of overseas military bases with the construction of Camp Bondsteel on 775 expropriated acres of rolling countryside near the Macedonian border as a spoil of victory.

Biden wrote in his memoir that Camp Bondsteel provided a “strong statement of U.S. intentions” in the war.[23] A roadway next to the base characteristically was named after Joe’s son, Beau Biden, who served as a legal adviser in Kosovo.[24]

In the Shadow of Averell Harriman

As we know, Biden started his Senate career promoting troop withdrawals from Vietnam but, by the 1990s, he had transformed himself into a strong proponent of socalled “humanitarian intervention.”

Richard C. Holbrooke recalled that, when he was nominated as assistant secretary of state for Europe in late 1994, Biden “in no uncertain terms made it clear to me that the policy on Bosnia had to change and he would make sure it did. He believed in action, and history proved him right.”

Biden’s interest in Yugoslavia dates back to the late 1970s when he accompanied W. Averell Harriman and his wife Pamela on a trip to Yugoslavia to attend the funeral of Eduard Kardelj, Tito’s intellectual mentor.

A son of one of the original robber barons who founded the legendary Wall Street firm, Brown Brothers & Co., Harriman served as U.S. ambassador to the Soviet Union 1943-1946, Secretary of Commerce 1946-1948, Governor of New York 1955-1958 and Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs under John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.[25]

Biden wrote in his memoir that he had been “adopted by Harriman” when he got to the Senate in 1972 as a “thirty-year old kid.”[26]

During their visit, Harriman predicted that the Soviet Union would collapse and told Joe that he should “get to know Yugoslavia” because it was an “area we could bring into the 21st century as an ally.”[27]

Two decades later, as a now-prominent member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden helped see to it that Harriman’s ambition was fulfilled.

Biden wrote in his memoir that his interest in Yugoslavia was rekindled in 1991 when he was visited in his office on K Street by a Croatian Roman Catholic monk who recounted to him how the Serbs had desecrated the Catholic shrine in Medjugorje in southern Bosnia, which was known as the Lourdes of Bosnia.[28]

The monk asked him “why, as a staunch supporter of Israel, he wasn’t paying attention while Catholics were being killed [by the Serbs].”[29]

At the time, Biden was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on European Affairs. He decided to sponsor hearings on the breakup of Yugoslavia with the purpose of arousing public indignation at Serb atrocities.

When Milošević’s ambassador, a “well-tailored and obsequious fellow,” showed up in Biden’s office, suggesting that Biden had it wrong, that the Serbs were the “good guys” who patterned themselves “after you,” and that the Muslims in Bosnia would make an Islamic state, he invited Biden to meet with Milošević.[30]

Biden took the ambassador up on his offer in April 1993 and traveled to Sarajevo. Rather than hearing out his perspective, however, he confronted Milošević—whom he compared to a mob boss—telling him to his face that he was a “damned war criminal who should be tried as one.”

Biden later told Congress that he had emerged from the meeting convinced that Milošević was a “man with an agenda that was anathema to our interests and was literally genocidal.”

Biden said that “once firmly established as the unchallenged boss of Serbia,” Milošević had “cynically provoked successive crises in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo in order to hold onto power by distracting public attention from his corrupt mismanagement of the Serbian economy and state.”

In another speech before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in May 1993, Biden specified that the conflict in the Balkans was initiated by “Serb expansionism and aggressionism” and “fascist thuggery on the march” and was “no more a civil war than Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Austria had civil wars” in the 1930s.[31]

Biden’s interpretation ignores the fact that Milošević had worked to try to preserve the Yugoslav federation along with a Titoist policy of non-alignment with the U.S. and West.

In his memoir, Biden described a British helicopter pilot in Bosnia who told him “they’re all bad, they’re all bad,” as “pernicious, like Stock character in a Noel Coward play, a lethal mix of self-importance and willful ignorance.”[32]

Biden claimed that the indifference to Serb atrocities in the U.S. was the result of the prejudice against Muslims, stating in one emotional address before the Senate that “if these were not Muslims [being victimized], the world would have reacted, just as if it were not Jews in the 1930s.”

These comments display how Biden advanced the case for war by exploiting liberal guilt over the mistreatment of minority groups and abandonment of the Jews during the Holocaust.

Biden wrote that in “the 23 years I have been here [Senate Foreign Relations Committee], there is not another issue that has more upset me, angered me, frustrated me, and occasionally made me feel a sense of shame about what the West, what the democratic powers of the world are allowing to happen. I’m tired of all this.”

This was another example of clever political strategizing as Biden effectively cast himself as an anti-establishment crusader morally repulsed by the powers that be and their refusal to stand up for the world’s oppressed—all while he was lobbying for war.

“Lift and Strike” and the Road to Dayton

In 1992, Biden sponsored a law authorizing assistance to Bosnia through a drawdown of up to $50 million in Defense Department stocks of military weapons and equipment.

Upon returning from his 1993 trip to Sarajevo—which he described as resembling “Dresden [in World War II] with graffiti”[33]—Biden issued a 36-page report laying out eight policy proposals to deal with Milošević, including airstrikes on Serb artillery.

Biden subsequently co-sponsored a “lift and strike” proposal with Senate majority leader Bob Dole (R-KS) and Joe Lieberman (D-CT) that would lift an arms embargo, which Biden likened to “an act of moral rape,” followed by air strikes.

The Clinton administration worked around the arms embargo by establishing an illegal arms pipeline to the Bosnian Muslims and Croats through Iran, which became an open secret.[34]

On August 28, 1995, Clinton ordered bombing strikes over Bosnia under Operation Deliberate Force, which garnered almost zero public opposition.

The tide of opinion had shifted when the Bosnian Serbs overran the eastern mountain town of Srebrenica on July 14th and massacred Muslims.

In a preview of the tactics used to sell war in Iraq in 2003, U.S. Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright gave a dramatic performance at the UN where she showed satellite photos of alleged mass graves at Srebrenica—though the photos did not show any actual dead bodies and Albright never made them available for public examination.

Biden contributed to the drumbeat for war by publicly denouncing the Srebrenica atrocities, writing in his memoir that the day of Srebrenica was his “saddest day in the Senate.”

Biden expressed further indignation at the Serbs alleged shelling of Sarajevo’s Markale Market Square in two separate incidents on February 5, 1994, and August 28, 1995, just two days before Operation Deliberate Force was launched.

Independent investigators arrived at the conclusion that the Bosnian army carried out the shelling and tried to blame the Serbs in order to show them in a bad light and “tilt international support in their favor,” in the words of a British Lieutenant General.[35]

Operation Deliberate Force resulted in the deaths of more than 200 Bosnian Serbs, including 10 civilians at a hospital in the Sarajevo suburb of Blazuj.[36]

It was followed up by the signing of the Dayton Accords—a neocolonial agreement which legitimized the occupation of Bosnia by 60,000 NATO troops, 20,000 of them from the U.S., and drafting of a new constitution granting full executive powers in all matters to a Swedish official, Carl Bildt, appointed by the UN Security Council, who could overrule the prime ministers and appointed ministers.

Saving or Costing Lives?

Biden told the Baltimore Sun that if the “lift and strike” proposal had been adopted earlier, genocide could have been averted.

The Bosnian Serbs had committed the “largest mass murder [at Srebrenica] in Europe since the days of Adolf Hitler,” which Biden said he had warned about in 1993 when he wrote “if the West does not act, the eastern town of Srebrenica would become “’the Guernica of our time.’”[37]

The latter analogy was misleading because the killing at Srebrenica was not one-sided like Guernica, which was bombed by the Nazis during the Spanish Civil War.

The massacre of Muslims by Bosnian Serbs at Srebrenica—whose numbers remain in dispute—was preceded by large-scale killing of Serbs by Muslim regiments under the command of Naser Orić, who bragged about killing 114 Serbs in one single incident.[38]

Curiously, few human remains were ever found near Srebrenica’s killing fields. Autopsy reports also revealed that many of the Muslims died from battle-related wounds.[39]

In pressing for military intervention, Biden consistently played up Serb atrocities, claiming before the Senate and again in his memoirs that the Serbs ran torture, death and rape camps[40]— allegations that are difficult to corroborate, and which President Izetbegovic admitted before his death were designed to trigger a bombing campaign by western powers.[41]

In the 2008 vice-presidential debate with Sarah Palin, Biden claimed that his recommendations on Bosnia “saved tens of thousands of lives.”

In fact, it could be argued that they cost tens of thousands of lives.

The terms of the Dayton agreement that ended the conflict were more favorable to the Bosnian Serbs than the 1993 Vance-Owen Plan, which Milošević, had agreed to, but Biden, following the lead of the Clinton administration, rejected.[42]

Biden called the Vance-Owen plan “profoundly flawed” in its “approach of creating separate ethnic enclaves,” and told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that it would “incite violence, rather than discouraging it.”[43]

However, if Vance-Owen had been signed, the war would have ended two years earlier than it did and much bloodshed would have been avoided.

Biden and the Kosovo War

In 2016, during meetings with Serbian Prime Minister Aleksandar Vučić, Biden offered condolences for the victims of the bombing in Kosovo, which included between 500 and 2,000 civilians.[44] The bombing had intensified the level of ethnic cleansing and left carcinogens in the air and radioactive waste from the use of depleted uranium.[45]

Seventeen years earlier, Biden had told CNN that Clinton’s authorization of the bombing was “absolutely correct,” warning of the consequences of inaction: “[Yugoslav president Slobodan] Milošević will engage in ethnic cleansing. The number of refugees will be in the magnitude of tens of thousands. The region will be destabilized. And our interests will be badly hurt,” Biden said.

As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden coordinated hearings in the Spring and fall of 1999 that gave a platform for hawks like Robert Kagan, then a senior associate of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Ivo Daalder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, Eliot Cohen, director of the Johns Hopkins School of Strategic Studies, Senator Robert Dole (R-KS), who had strong ties with the Croat lobby, and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

With Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Biden sponsored a Senate resolution authorizing President Clinton to use “all necessary force,” including ground troops, to win the war in Kosovo.

Clinton had not asked for such authority and believed the war could have been won without ground forces.[46]

Biden’s aim in supporting intervention was to protect the Albanian minority in Kosovo from ethnic cleansing directed by the Serbs.

In attempting to fulfill Averell Harriman’s old ambition, Biden further advocated for regime change in Serbia, which was achieved when Milošević resigned on October 7, 2000, after a “color revolution” supported through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and was put on trial at The Hague.

Biden had called the Serbs “illiterates and “degenerates” on CNN.[47]

He exaggerated the level of Serb atrocities and overlooked the fact that the Albanian-led Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) had been branded as a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department mere months before the war started.[48]

The KLA’s ambition was to rule Kosovo and establish a federation with neighboring Albania while expelling the Serb minority which had been dominant in Kosovo.[49]

Kosovo had sentimental value to the Serbs as the site of a famous 14th century battle where they were defeated by the Ottoman Turks.

In 2010, now Vice President Biden referred to KLA leader Hashim Thaçi as the “George Washington of Kosovo,” and later said that he had “showed great courage” in “bringing democracy to Kosovo.”

In June 2020, Thaçi had to cancel a trip to Washington, however, because he had been indicted by the ICTY in The Hague for war crimes and crimes against humanity—crimes rangin from murder, enforced disappearances and torture.[50]

Previous reports had linked Thaçi to organized crime and to a human organ smuggling operation involving the selling of Serb organs that were extracted during violent interrogations.[51]

When Biden visited Kosovo’s capital of Pristina during his Vice Presidency, he was greeted enthusiastically by waving crowds.[52]

However, Kosovo experienced significant problems following the U.S.-NATO bombing, including huge unemployment and staggering political corruption which resulted in Kosovo emerging at the center of the international drug trade and prostitution rings in Europe.

Many of Kosovo’s resources were privatized and sold to Western multinational corporations and thousands of Serbs and ethnic Roma were driven out. The police service trained by the U.S. was “dominated by fear, corruption and incompetence.”

The country had the feeling of being a colony ruled by viceroys appointed by the U.S. and NATO and dominated by a giant U.S. military base, Camp Bondsteel, which housed Kosovo’s main prison.[53]

In December 2004, plans went forward for the construction of a $1.2 billion Trans-Balkan pipeline south of Camp Bondsteel financed by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

The questions for us today include: What new Kosovos and Bosnias will take root under a Biden presidency, and will liberals oppose these wars?

Jeremy Kuzmarov is Managing Editor of CovertAction Magazine and author of four books on U.S. foreign policy, including Obama’s Unending Wars (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2019).

[1] Joe Biden, Promises to Keep: On Life and Politics (New York: Random House, 2007).

[2] Ebony Bowden, “Joe Biden exaggerated claim he took lead against Balkan genocide: report,” New York Post, January 10, 2020, https://nypost.com/2020/01/10/joe-biden ... de-report/

[3] Biden, Promises to Keep, 272.

[4] John F. Harris, “In Handling a Crisis, a Different President; Aides Note Clinton’s Calm, Steady Focus,” The Washington Post, June 8, 1999.

[5] https://twitter.com/friendsofserbs/stat ... 52?lang=en

[6] See David Gibbs, First Do No Harm: Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2009).

[7] Genocide Victims of Krajina v. L-3 Communications Corp. and MPRI Inc., in the United States District Court Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The judge said that he was not qualified to preside over the case because the crimes occurred in Bosnia. Croat army units trained by MPRI killed 185 Serb civilians in Mrkonjić in southwestern Bosnia. See also Tony Geraghty, Soldiers of Fortune (London: Pegasus Books, 2009), 175. U.S. warplanes provided further support to Operation Storm by bombing a Krajina Serb airfield and destroying radar installations, allowing Croatian planes free rein to bomb and strafe columns of fleeing civilians. See https://casetext.com/case/genocide-vict ... -servs-inc.

[8] Author interview, survivor of Bosnian war, Moscow, Russia, May 9, 2018; Diana Johnstone, Fools Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2002), 61; William F. Engdahl, Manifest Destiny: Democracy as Cognitive Dissidence (mine.books, 2018), 108, citing ICTY court records.

[9] Roger Peace, Jeremy Kuzmarov, and Brian D’Haeselear, “The Post-Cold War Era,” http://peacehistory-usfp.org/post-cold-war-era/; Philip Corwin, Dubious Mandate: A Memoir of the UN (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999), 22; David Binder, “Aliza Izetbegovic, ex-President of Bosnia, Dies at 78,” The New York Times, October 19, 2003, https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/inte ... at-78.html; Alija Izetbegović, The Islamic Declaration (Sarajevo, 1990).

[10] See John R. Schindler, Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al Qaida, and the Rise of Global Jihad (London: Zenith Press, 2007); Richard J. Aldrich, “America Used Islamists to Arm the Bosnian Muslims,” The Guardian, April 22, 2002. The Algerians were members of the Algerian Goupe Islamique Armee (GIA) held responsible for massive massacres of Algerian civilians during the Algerian civil war. The Afghan mujahidin had been trained in terrorist methods by the CIA.

[11] Schindler, Unholy Terror; Lt. Col. John Sray, “Selling the Bosnian Myth to America: Buyer Beware,” U.S. Army, Foreign Military Studies Office, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, October 1995, http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/fmso1095.htm. The mujahadin’s terror arsenal found included fragmentation bombs disguised as children’s toys.

[12] Gibbs, First Do No Harm; Evangelos Mahairas, “The Breakup of Yugoslavia,” in Hidden Agenda: U.S./NATO Takeover of Yugoslavia, John Catalinotto and Sara Flounders, eds. (New York: International Action Center, 2002), 47-54; Sarah Flounders, NATO in the Balkans (New York: International Action Center, 1998), 48, 49.

[13] James A. Lucas, “Media Disinformation and the War in Yugoslavia,” Global Research, September 5, 2005, https://www.globalresearch.ca/media-dis ... isited/899.

[14] Gibbs, First Do No Harm, 46; Michel Chossudovsky, “Dismantling Yugoslavia, Colonizing Bosnia,” Covert Action Quarterly, Spring 1996.

[15] Peace, Kuzmarov, and D’Haeselear, “The Post Cold War Era.” Regarding theories of why the former Yugoslavia descended into ethnic-political wars in the 1990s, see Randy Hodson, Dusko Sekulic, and Garth Massey, “National Tolerance in the Former Yugoslavia,” American Journal of Sociology 99, no. 6 (1994): 1534-558.

[16] Michel Chossudovsky, “Dismantling Yugoslavia, Colonizing Bosnia,” in NATO in the Balkans, Flounders, ed., 82.

[17] Hidden Agenda, Catalinotto and Flounders, eds.

[18] Warren Zimmerman, Origins of a Catastrophe: Yugoslavia and Its Destroyers–America’s Last Ambassador Tells What Happened and Why (New York: Random House, 1996), 75; Gibbs, First Do No Harm, 87; Hidden Agenda, Catalinooto and Flounders, eds., xx.

[19] Zimmerman, Origins of a Catastrophe.

[20] Gary Wilson, “The Dayton Accords Reshape Europe,” in NATO in the Balkans, Flounders, ed., 147. General John Galvin, a former NATO commander and head of West Point, planned and executed Bosnian army offensives.

[21] George Packer, Our Man: Richard Holbrooke and the End of the American Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2019). Biden oversaw the Senate’s ratification of the admission into NATO of Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic in March 1998.

[22] Bob Davis, “Clinton to Propose Ending Some Tariffs to Boost Development in the Balkans,” The Wall Street Journal, July 30, 1999.

[23] Biden, Promises to Keep, 289.

[24] Esteban Parra, “Highway in Kosovo named after Beau Biden,” Delaware Online, August 17, 2016, https://www.delawareonline.com/story/ne ... /88895644/

[25] See Rudy Abramson, Spanning the Century: The Life of W. Averell Harriman, 1891-1986 (New York: William Morrow, 1992). Harriman was a strong supporter of the Vietnam War.

[26] Biden, Promises to Keep, 248.

[27] Biden, Promises to Keep, 248.

[28] Biden, Promises to Keep, 246.

[29] Biden, Promises to Keep, 246.

[30] Biden, Promises to Keep, 261.

[31] “Conflict in Yugoslavia,” May 12, 1993, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Speech before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, C-Span, https://www.c-span.org/video/?40657-1/c ... yugoslavia.

[32] Biden, Promises to Keep, 271.

[33] Biden, Promises to Keep, 269. Dresden was mercilessly bombed by the Allies in World War II.

[34] James Risen and Doyle McManus, “U.S. OKd Iranian Arms for Bosnia, Officials Say,” Los Angeles Times, April 5, 1996, https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm ... story.html; Schindler, Unholy Terror, 182.

[35] Cees Wiebes, Intelligence and the War in Bosnia 1992-1995 (Netherlands: LIT Verlage, 2003), 68, David Binder, “Bosnia’s Bombers,” The Nation, October 2, 1995; Sray, “Selling the Bosnian Myth to America”; Gibbs, First Do No Harm, 125, 126. David Owen, a European community negotiator noted that UN personnel had long suspected that the attacks were being undertaken by Muslim units firing on their own people. Such suspicions were confirmed in August 1995 when a French UN team pinpointed some of the sniping to a building which they knew was controlled by Bosnian government forces. Later, several international witnesses testified in the Karadzic trial that the Bosnian Muslims had shelled their own people in order to give NATO a pretext to bomb the Serbs.

[36] Lt. Col. Mark J. Conversino, “Executing Deliberate Force, 30 August – 14 September 1995,” in Deliberate Force: A Case Study in Effective Air Campaigning, Colonel Robert C. Owen, ed. (Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press, 2000), 161; Tracy Wilkinson, “U.S. Fires 13 Cruise Missiles at Serbia Targets in Bosnia,” The Los Angeles Times, September 11, 1995; David Rhode, “A Reversal of Fortune: Bosnian Serbs as Victims,” The Christian Science Monitor, September 13, 1995. U.S. planes flew two-thirds of the sorties in Deliberate Force.

[37] Guernica was made famous by Pablo Picasso’s painting depicting the savagery of fascist bombing.

[38] Canadian General Lewis MacKenzie has stated that “evidence to date suggests that he (Naser Orić) was responsible for killing as many Serb civilians outside Srebrenica as the Bosnian Serb army was for massacring Bosnian Muslims inside the town.” British journalist Joan Phillips claimed that, by March 31, 1993, “out of 9,300 Serbs who used to live (in the Srebrenica municipality), less than 900 remain…only three Serbian villages remain and around 26 have been destroyed.” Edward S. Herman and Emily Schwartz Greco, “Serb Demonization as Propaganda Coup,” Foreign Policy in Focus, March 19, 2009, https://fpif.org/serb_demonization_as_propaganda_coup/. French General Philippe Morillon testified in the Milošević trial that Orić “took no prisoners,” and that his mass killings from the “safe area” had been the key factor in explaining Serb vengefulness in their takeover of Srebrenica –facts that Biden omits.

[39] See Deconstruction of a Virtual Genocide: An Intelligent Person’s Guide to Srebrenica, Stephen Karganovic et al., eds., NGO Srebrenica Historical Project, The Netherlands (Belgrade: Den Haag, 2011); Edward S. Herman and David Peterson, “The ‘Srbrenica Massacre’ Turns Twenty Years Old,” Dissident Voice, August 5, 2015, https://dissidentvoice.org/2015/08/the- ... years-old/; RADISLAV KRSTI] BECOMES THE FIRST PERSON TO BE CONVICTED OF GENOCIDE AT THE ICTY AND IS SENTENCED TO 46 YEARS IMPRISONMENT, UN, ICTY Press Release, August 4, 2001, https://www.icty.org/x/cases/krstic/tju ... ary_en.pdf. The ICTY determined that the Serbs had tried to cover up their crimes by removing bodies from alleged mass graves, however, the logistics of this would have been very difficult in the middle of a war. Eye witnesses who claimed to have observed mass executions at the ICTY were unreliable, including a suspected double agent and Naser Oric’s brother, Melvuddin.

[40] Congressional Record, Volume 141, Number 117 (Wednesday July 19, 1995); Biden, Promises to Keep, 257.

[41] Gibbs, First Do No Harm, 124, 125; Edward S. Herman, “The Politics of the Srebrenica Massacre,” Global Research, July 7, 2005; The Srebrenica Massacre: Evidence, Context, Politics, Edward S. Herman, ed. (Evergreen, Ill: Alphabet Soup, 2011) Sworn affidavits suggest, according to a number of researchers, that more Serbs were raped by Muslims and Croats than vice versa. Herman and Schwartz, “Serb Demonization as Propaganda Coup.” Some of Biden’s allegations were being promoted in the media, whose yellow journalism was reminiscent of the Spanish-American War and World War I when exaggerated stories about German atrocities in Belgium were designed to facilitate U.S. intervention in the Great War. See Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero and Myth Maker (London: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1975).

[42] Gibbs, First Do No Harm.

[43] “Conflict in Yugoslavia,” May 12, 1993, Joseph Biden, Jr., Speech before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, C-Span, https://www.c-span.org/video/?40657-1/c ... yugoslavia.

[44] “Biden offers condolences for 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia,” The Boston Globe, August 16, 2016, https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/world/ ... story.html

[45] See Michael Parenti, To Kill a Nation: The Attack on Yugoslavia (London: Verso, 2002).

[46] Helen Dewar and Juliet Eilperin, “Senate Divided on Kosovo Strategy,” The Washington Post, May 4, 1999, A18, https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/p ... gress4.htm

[47] Branko Marcetic, Yesterday’s Man: The Case Against Joe Biden (London: Verso, 2020), 141.

[48] See Noam Chomsky, A New Generation Draws the Line: Kosovo, East Timor and the Standards of the West (London: Verso, 2000); James Pettifer, The Kosovo Liberation Army: Underground War to Balkan Insurgency, 1948-2001 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).

[49] NATO in the Balkans, Flounders, ed.

[50] Jeremy Kuzmarov, “Biden Compared Indicted War Criminal to ‘George Washington,’” Counterpunch, July 2, 2020, https://www.counterpunch.org/2020/07/02 ... ashington/

[51] Kuzmarov, “Biden Compared Indicted War Criminal to ‘George Washington.”

[52] Nebi Qena, “Kosovo’s Crazy For Joe Biden,” NBC News, May 21, 2009, https://www.nbcwashington.com/local/bid ... o/1875816/

[53] See Sara Flounders, “Washington Gets a New Colony in the Balkans,” Workers of the World, February 21, 2008, https://www.workers.org/2008/world/kosovo_0228/; Diana Johnstone, “NATO’s Kosovo Colony,” Counterpunch, February 18, 2008, https://www.counterpunch.org/2008/02/18 ... vo-colony/; David Binder, “Kosovo Auf Deutsch,” November 18, 2007, Balkananalysis.com. Kosovo also became a haven for Islamic fundamentalism and extremism.

[54] Peter Dale Scott, The Road to 9/11: Wealth, Empire and the Future of America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 169; Sally Denton, The Profiteers: Bechtel and the Men Who Built the World (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2016), 306. The Houston-based energy company Enron also got a $175-million contract for building and operating a power plant and supplying electricity for the next 20 years—six days after it donated $100,000 to the Democratic Party. Jack Cashill, Ron Brown’s Body: How One Man’s Death Saved the Clinton Presidency and Hillary’s Future (Nashville, TN: WND Books, 2004) 284, 285.

[55] https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/r ... p?id=76032.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2021/01/ ... criminals/

'normalcy'.............................
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:16 pm

The Dem's favorite war-shill outdoes himself with a historical analogy that would make Goebbels green with envy.
The GOP’s Bolshevik Moment

The party’s “no enemies to the right” strategy could destroy it from within.
By FRED KAPLAN
FEB 03, 20214:17 PM

Image
Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images Plus and Pavel Semyonovich Zhukov/Wikipedia.

The Republican Party’s tolerance and embrace of far-right extremists bring to mind the case of Alexander Kerensky, Russia’s first and last prime minister before the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. Kerensky, the leader of a relatively moderate socialist party, proclaimed a policy of “no enemies to the left” and, as a result, released Vladimir Lenin from prison, where he’d been interned for his failed attempt to overthrow Kerensky’s own government in July of that year. And so, three months later, an emboldened Lenin tried again and succeeded, with catastrophic results for the entire century.

(more...)

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... reene.html
Man, that Cold War propaganda is a well that never runs dry. Putting aside the mass of historical inaccuracies in this hysterical hit-piece it speaks volumes that the chatterers from either wing of capitalism think they've hit a home run every time they in any way reference communism and their intramural opposition in the same sentence. What with a couple of Bernie Bros saying nice things about socialism the Dems were at a great disadvantage in this traditional pissing contest. But Fred Kaplan is a craftsman of pretzel logic who will twist any and every US military atrocity into a positive, even if it's a bogus morality tale. But this takes the cake, he should get a prize, mebbe a ticket for the next SpaceX Mars rocket...

The man knows his business, make no mistake. His liberal readership will fall upon this like a plate of truffles. Why hasn't Biden found a place for this guy in his cabinet? He'd fit right in with Rice & Power.

The bald-face liar is gone from the White House but his tenure has upped the game, all around. The old school of half-truths, campaign promises no one ever believed, murder buried in jargon and studied denial won't cut it these days. Over the top, jump that shark, assume the jaded public will not notice anything less. Hyperbole will go the way of satire, defeated by reality.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Fri Feb 05, 2021 2:31 pm

Image

Everything About the Biden Administration is Fake
February 3, 2021
By Caitlin Johnstone – Feb 1, 2021

A new exclusive from The Daily Beast titled “White House Reporters: Biden Team Wanted Our Questions in Advance” reports that the White House press corps is being pressured to provide briefing questions ahead of time in a way that makes even mainstream media journalists uncomfortable.

“While it’s a relief to see briefings return, particularly with a commitment to factual information, the press can’t really do its job in the briefing room if the White House is picking and choosing the questions they want,” one White House correspondent told The Daily Beast. “That’s not really a free press at all.”

“It pissed off enough reporters for people to flag it for the [White House Correspondents Association] for them to deal with it,” another source reportedly said.

While Obama’s deputy press secretary Eric Schultz calls the move “textbook communications work” designed to ensure that Biden’s press secretary has answers ready instead of having to “repeatedly punt questions”, clearly the reporters on the job feel differently.

“The requests prompted concerns among the White House press corps, whose members, like many reporters, are sensitive to the perception that they are coordinating with political communications staffers,” writes the Beast.


Having questions in advance would indeed be a good way to help insulate press secretary Jen Psaki (for whom liberals are already developing an unwholesome celebrity crush) from hard questions. This would avoid sticky situations like when Psaki deflected inquiries about treasury secretary Janet Yellen’s conflict of interest with the Citadel controversy by babbling about Yellen being the first woman in her position and claiming that receiving $800,000 in speaking fees from that company is no reason for her to recuse herself.

So this is just one more item on the steadily growing pile of fake things about this administration. Everything about it is phony. This is the Astroturf Administration.

Biden and his cohorts point-blank lied about sending out $2000 checks.

Deportations are continuing unimpeded despite all the campaign pledges to the contrary.

The kids in cages that made Rachel Maddow cry on air during the Trump administration are still in their cages and will remain there for the foreseeable future.

The pro-environment candidate has authorized dozens of new oil drilling permitswithin days of taking office.

Re-entering the Iran nuclear deal seems as far off as ever, with the administration continuing Trump’s “maximum pressure campaign” even as Tehran says the US ending its cruel sanctions is a precondition to resuming the deal.

Biden still hasn’t taken any solid steps to end the horrific war on Yemen, or even to end US facilitation of the slaughter as he promised on the campaign trail (he could have taken major steps toward doing this the day he took office and chose not to).

While this president hides from the press due to his rapidly deteriorating ability to answer questions in complete sentences, the mass media churn out think pieces about how taking himself out of the spotlight is actually a brilliant political move.

As Our Hidden History recently put it, “We got sold a sack of political oregano.”


And that’s all the US empire ever is, really: a murderous, tyrannical planetary oppressor covered up by varying degrees of dishonesty. During the Trump administration the depravity was a little more honest about itself, now during the Biden administration it’s a little more dishonest. The only major change is the thickness with which the makeup is slathered over the skull.

Everything about life in our current world order is dominated by phoniness. Our culture is manufactured by Hollywood. Our dominating political structure is manufactured by think tanks. Our perceptions of what’s going on in the world are manufactured in Langley and Arlington. The whole thing is so fake and stupid. We’ve got to figure out a way to snap out of these artificial boxes they are placing over our minds and these perceptual filters they are placing over our eyes, and birth something real and authentic into our world.

https://orinocotribune.com/everything-a ... n-is-fake/

To be 'fair'(undeservedly) Biden did announce some measures which could de-escalate the genocidal war against Yemen on 2/04/21, a few days after this was posted. It seems he is giving some attention to some of his left's criticisms which I expect will prove largely superficial when cheap talk edges towards policy execution. His double talk about fracking sets the tone. Yet liberals will be outraged by less than sycophantic slobber for a few crumbs from the ruling class table. "Do you want Trump back?!?!", I can hear it now.

The Dems will continue to present as though they give a shit while doubling down on aggressive imperialism and paying lip service to ecocide. As always the Democratic Party is the piss which sets the Republican dye in the body politic. Bet on it.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:04 pm

Nightmare Years Will Repeat Themselves – Until the People Kick Out the Cabal
Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor 04 Feb 2021

Image
Nightmare Years Will Repeat Themselves – Until the People Kick Out the Cabal

To take on the corporate imperial racial capitalist state, we need a Black-led movement that puts politics in command and names the Democratic perpetrators and collaborators that are culpable in the unfolding, late-stage capitalist disaster.

“If the people don’t directly challenge the oligarchy, then no political crisis exists for the rulers, no matter how lethal conditions become for the majority of the population.”



By any objective reckoning, capitalism should have lost all vestige of legitimacy in the nightmare year 2020, when Covid-19 revealed the non-existence of a national health care system in the United States at precisely the historical moment when billionaire wealth exploded beyond the wildest dreams of the oligarchy. The most massive popular mobilization in U.S. history put tens of millions in the streets in June under the Black Lives Matter banner, proof that much more than a critical mass of the public is willing to mobilize for social justice. A Harris and Just Capital poll taken the previous month showed that only 25 percent of the public believed our current form of capitalism ensures the greater good of society – a belief gruesomely confirmed when the pandemic death toll approached half a million at year’s end.

So, why is there no imminent threat to the dictatorship of capital, no mass convulsion on the horizon that might bring down a system that has so demonstrably failed to provide for the health, welfare, security or happiness of the masses of people – and that allows Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world, to invest tens of billions in disaster capitalist profits in his bid to privatize space while Americans –disproportionately Black and brown Americans -- die gasping for air here on the ground?

“Only 25 percent of the public believed our current form of capitalism ensures the greater good of society.”

Economic crises -- or health or military catastrophes -- do not automatically lead to political crises that threaten the ruling order. A transformative politics requires mass organizations that are clear on who the enemy is, and that have at least a general idea of what kind of society they want to create. If the people don’t directly challenge the oligarchy – whose wealth becomes even more concentrated during economic meltdowns – then no political crisis exists for the rulers, no matter how lethal conditions become for the majority of the population. Mobilization, by itself, is not enough if the massed millions are not consciously organized to bring down the structures at the root of their oppression – an historical fact that was reaffirmed by the failure of the mammoth protests of June to present any threat to the oligarchy that rules the United States.

It is true that, among the more politically advanced elements of the Black movement, it is increasing understood that the enemy is racial capitalism, the only kind of capitalism that exists in both national and global terms. “You can’t have capitalism without racism,” as Malcolm X declared. But anti-capitalism, although verbally expressed throughout Black activist circles and incorporated in many group statements of principles, did not shape the demands of the movement or prevent activists from collaborating in practice with one of the two pillars of corporate rule: the Democratic Party.

“Mobilization, by itself, is not enough.”

More than half a century ago, Malcolm understood the duopoly electoral system as “foxes” (Democrats) and “wolves” (Republicans), and that “both will eat you.” And indeed, the Democratic foxes have since Malcolm’s time devoured the vast bulk of the community’s civic organizations, turning Black churches, sororities and fraternities, and so-called “civil rights” groups into partisan annexes of the corporate duopoly. The Democratic Party, a mechanism of mass manipulation and social control, dominates every aspect of political life in Black America, blunting and negating the radical impulses of the nation’s most lean-leaning, socialist-friendly polity. Thus, Black Lives Matter activists say they oppose racial capitalism but collaborate with, and base their strategies on, intimate interactions with Black operatives of the corporate political machinery: the thoroughly Democratic “Black Misleadership Class.”

Not that the movement has altered the political behavior of most Black elected officials in any substantive way. Although Black Lives Matter is a world model in confronting the police – the perennial flashpoint of Black interaction with the corporate state -- Black Democratic elected officials at the national level continue to vote in lockstep with corporate Democratic leadership on militarization of local police (2014) and elevation of cops to the status of “protected class” -- assault on which can now be prosecuted as a federal hate crime (2018).

The avowedly socialist, anti-imperialist, and Black self-determinationist elements within the Black Lives Matter umbrella are the best hope to lead a genuinely transformative movement in the United States – primarily because most Black Americans are peace-minded, socialism-friendly, and supportive of Black autonomy. But this can only happen if these organizations “put politics in command” and confront the enemy within: the Democratic Party, which is hegemonic in Black America.

“Most Black Americans are peace-minded, socialism-friendly, and supportive of Black autonomy.”

Democratic hegemony does not mean unbeatable. The two most revered Black political icons, Malcolm and MLK, understood that you can’t effectively oppose the white oligarchs without first confronting Black Democrats, who are the ruling class’s first line of defense (and offense) in the Black community. Black Democratic mayors and councilpersons eagerly oversaw local mass Black incarceration regimes in the “chocolate cities” of the Seventies and Eighties – and called it progress. Even a narrow police and prisons abolition movement must politically defeat Black Democrats -- delegitimize them -- if it is to be an enduring force in the community. To grossly paraphrase Malcolm, “You can’t have capitalist hegemony in Black America without Black Democrats.” They are the enemy within.

To take on the corporate imperial racial capitalist state, we need a Black-led movement that puts politics in command and names the perpetrators and collaborators that are culpable in the unfolding, late-stage capitalist disaster, and is capable of presenting a coherent vision of a socialist future in which all peoples rights to self-determination are recognized, and where the people provide for their communal security.

Conditions of life will worsen as the contradictions of racial capitalism deepen. But the ever-consolidating cabal at the top will not give up power out of embarrassment or rocket en mass to Mars; they will have to be overthrown by a mass movement seeking social transformation. United States history dictates that Black folk must lead this movement. That means taking on an end-of-era, global responsibility.

Nobody is ready to take on this mission – but it’s got to be done, anyway.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com .

US capitalism is surely racial capitalism but I would dispute the contention that all capitalism is 'racial' as the supposed examples, the Irish and the Slavs, were both being reduced to serfdom in the pre-capitalist era by the English and the Teutonic Knights, respectively.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

solidgold
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:36 pm

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by solidgold » Wed Feb 10, 2021 4:07 am

blindpig wrote:
Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:04 pm
Nightmare Years Will Repeat Themselves – Until the People Kick Out the Cabal
Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor 04 Feb 2021

Image
Nightmare Years Will Repeat Themselves – Until the People Kick Out the Cabal

To take on the corporate imperial racial capitalist state, we need a Black-led movement that puts politics in command and names the Democratic perpetrators and collaborators that are culpable in the unfolding, late-stage capitalist disaster.

“If the people don’t directly challenge the oligarchy, then no political crisis exists for the rulers, no matter how lethal conditions become for the majority of the population.”



By any objective reckoning, capitalism should have lost all vestige of legitimacy in the nightmare year 2020, when Covid-19 revealed the non-existence of a national health care system in the United States at precisely the historical moment when billionaire wealth exploded beyond the wildest dreams of the oligarchy. The most massive popular mobilization in U.S. history put tens of millions in the streets in June under the Black Lives Matter banner, proof that much more than a critical mass of the public is willing to mobilize for social justice. A Harris and Just Capital poll taken the previous month showed that only 25 percent of the public believed our current form of capitalism ensures the greater good of society – a belief gruesomely confirmed when the pandemic death toll approached half a million at year’s end.

So, why is there no imminent threat to the dictatorship of capital, no mass convulsion on the horizon that might bring down a system that has so demonstrably failed to provide for the health, welfare, security or happiness of the masses of people – and that allows Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world, to invest tens of billions in disaster capitalist profits in his bid to privatize space while Americans –disproportionately Black and brown Americans -- die gasping for air here on the ground?

“Only 25 percent of the public believed our current form of capitalism ensures the greater good of society.”

Economic crises -- or health or military catastrophes -- do not automatically lead to political crises that threaten the ruling order. A transformative politics requires mass organizations that are clear on who the enemy is, and that have at least a general idea of what kind of society they want to create. If the people don’t directly challenge the oligarchy – whose wealth becomes even more concentrated during economic meltdowns – then no political crisis exists for the rulers, no matter how lethal conditions become for the majority of the population. Mobilization, by itself, is not enough if the massed millions are not consciously organized to bring down the structures at the root of their oppression – an historical fact that was reaffirmed by the failure of the mammoth protests of June to present any threat to the oligarchy that rules the United States.

It is true that, among the more politically advanced elements of the Black movement, it is increasing understood that the enemy is racial capitalism, the only kind of capitalism that exists in both national and global terms. “You can’t have capitalism without racism,” as Malcolm X declared. But anti-capitalism, although verbally expressed throughout Black activist circles and incorporated in many group statements of principles, did not shape the demands of the movement or prevent activists from collaborating in practice with one of the two pillars of corporate rule: the Democratic Party.

“Mobilization, by itself, is not enough.”

More than half a century ago, Malcolm understood the duopoly electoral system as “foxes” (Democrats) and “wolves” (Republicans), and that “both will eat you.” And indeed, the Democratic foxes have since Malcolm’s time devoured the vast bulk of the community’s civic organizations, turning Black churches, sororities and fraternities, and so-called “civil rights” groups into partisan annexes of the corporate duopoly. The Democratic Party, a mechanism of mass manipulation and social control, dominates every aspect of political life in Black America, blunting and negating the radical impulses of the nation’s most lean-leaning, socialist-friendly polity. Thus, Black Lives Matter activists say they oppose racial capitalism but collaborate with, and base their strategies on, intimate interactions with Black operatives of the corporate political machinery: the thoroughly Democratic “Black Misleadership Class.”

Not that the movement has altered the political behavior of most Black elected officials in any substantive way. Although Black Lives Matter is a world model in confronting the police – the perennial flashpoint of Black interaction with the corporate state -- Black Democratic elected officials at the national level continue to vote in lockstep with corporate Democratic leadership on militarization of local police (2014) and elevation of cops to the status of “protected class” -- assault on which can now be prosecuted as a federal hate crime (2018).

The avowedly socialist, anti-imperialist, and Black self-determinationist elements within the Black Lives Matter umbrella are the best hope to lead a genuinely transformative movement in the United States – primarily because most Black Americans are peace-minded, socialism-friendly, and supportive of Black autonomy. But this can only happen if these organizations “put politics in command” and confront the enemy within: the Democratic Party, which is hegemonic in Black America.

“Most Black Americans are peace-minded, socialism-friendly, and supportive of Black autonomy.”

Democratic hegemony does not mean unbeatable. The two most revered Black political icons, Malcolm and MLK, understood that you can’t effectively oppose the white oligarchs without first confronting Black Democrats, who are the ruling class’s first line of defense (and offense) in the Black community. Black Democratic mayors and councilpersons eagerly oversaw local mass Black incarceration regimes in the “chocolate cities” of the Seventies and Eighties – and called it progress. Even a narrow police and prisons abolition movement must politically defeat Black Democrats -- delegitimize them -- if it is to be an enduring force in the community. To grossly paraphrase Malcolm, “You can’t have capitalist hegemony in Black America without Black Democrats.” They are the enemy within.

To take on the corporate imperial racial capitalist state, we need a Black-led movement that puts politics in command and names the perpetrators and collaborators that are culpable in the unfolding, late-stage capitalist disaster, and is capable of presenting a coherent vision of a socialist future in which all peoples rights to self-determination are recognized, and where the people provide for their communal security.

Conditions of life will worsen as the contradictions of racial capitalism deepen. But the ever-consolidating cabal at the top will not give up power out of embarrassment or rocket en mass to Mars; they will have to be overthrown by a mass movement seeking social transformation. United States history dictates that Black folk must lead this movement. That means taking on an end-of-era, global responsibility.

Nobody is ready to take on this mission – but it’s got to be done, anyway.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com .

US capitalism is surely racial capitalism but I would dispute the contention that all capitalism is 'racial' as the supposed examples, the Irish and the Slavs, were both being reduced to serfdom in the pre-capitalist era by the English and the Teutonic Knights, respectively.
Ford must’ve read the book I posted about last year. The “racial capitalism” (capitalism needs racism) model is the prevailing left critique of capitalism these days.“Capitalism NEEDS _______.” Reminds me of a cultural rebranding of Second International determinism.

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Wed Feb 10, 2021 1:09 pm

solidgold wrote:
Wed Feb 10, 2021 4:07 am
blindpig wrote:
Tue Feb 09, 2021 3:04 pm
Nightmare Years Will Repeat Themselves – Until the People Kick Out the Cabal
Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor 04 Feb 2021

Image
Nightmare Years Will Repeat Themselves – Until the People Kick Out the Cabal

To take on the corporate imperial racial capitalist state, we need a Black-led movement that puts politics in command and names the Democratic perpetrators and collaborators that are culpable in the unfolding, late-stage capitalist disaster.

“If the people don’t directly challenge the oligarchy, then no political crisis exists for the rulers, no matter how lethal conditions become for the majority of the population.”



By any objective reckoning, capitalism should have lost all vestige of legitimacy in the nightmare year 2020, when Covid-19 revealed the non-existence of a national health care system in the United States at precisely the historical moment when billionaire wealth exploded beyond the wildest dreams of the oligarchy. The most massive popular mobilization in U.S. history put tens of millions in the streets in June under the Black Lives Matter banner, proof that much more than a critical mass of the public is willing to mobilize for social justice. A Harris and Just Capital poll taken the previous month showed that only 25 percent of the public believed our current form of capitalism ensures the greater good of society – a belief gruesomely confirmed when the pandemic death toll approached half a million at year’s end.

So, why is there no imminent threat to the dictatorship of capital, no mass convulsion on the horizon that might bring down a system that has so demonstrably failed to provide for the health, welfare, security or happiness of the masses of people – and that allows Jeff Bezos, the richest man in the world, to invest tens of billions in disaster capitalist profits in his bid to privatize space while Americans –disproportionately Black and brown Americans -- die gasping for air here on the ground?

“Only 25 percent of the public believed our current form of capitalism ensures the greater good of society.”

Economic crises -- or health or military catastrophes -- do not automatically lead to political crises that threaten the ruling order. A transformative politics requires mass organizations that are clear on who the enemy is, and that have at least a general idea of what kind of society they want to create. If the people don’t directly challenge the oligarchy – whose wealth becomes even more concentrated during economic meltdowns – then no political crisis exists for the rulers, no matter how lethal conditions become for the majority of the population. Mobilization, by itself, is not enough if the massed millions are not consciously organized to bring down the structures at the root of their oppression – an historical fact that was reaffirmed by the failure of the mammoth protests of June to present any threat to the oligarchy that rules the United States.

It is true that, among the more politically advanced elements of the Black movement, it is increasing understood that the enemy is racial capitalism, the only kind of capitalism that exists in both national and global terms. “You can’t have capitalism without racism,” as Malcolm X declared. But anti-capitalism, although verbally expressed throughout Black activist circles and incorporated in many group statements of principles, did not shape the demands of the movement or prevent activists from collaborating in practice with one of the two pillars of corporate rule: the Democratic Party.

“Mobilization, by itself, is not enough.”

More than half a century ago, Malcolm understood the duopoly electoral system as “foxes” (Democrats) and “wolves” (Republicans), and that “both will eat you.” And indeed, the Democratic foxes have since Malcolm’s time devoured the vast bulk of the community’s civic organizations, turning Black churches, sororities and fraternities, and so-called “civil rights” groups into partisan annexes of the corporate duopoly. The Democratic Party, a mechanism of mass manipulation and social control, dominates every aspect of political life in Black America, blunting and negating the radical impulses of the nation’s most lean-leaning, socialist-friendly polity. Thus, Black Lives Matter activists say they oppose racial capitalism but collaborate with, and base their strategies on, intimate interactions with Black operatives of the corporate political machinery: the thoroughly Democratic “Black Misleadership Class.”

Not that the movement has altered the political behavior of most Black elected officials in any substantive way. Although Black Lives Matter is a world model in confronting the police – the perennial flashpoint of Black interaction with the corporate state -- Black Democratic elected officials at the national level continue to vote in lockstep with corporate Democratic leadership on militarization of local police (2014) and elevation of cops to the status of “protected class” -- assault on which can now be prosecuted as a federal hate crime (2018).

The avowedly socialist, anti-imperialist, and Black self-determinationist elements within the Black Lives Matter umbrella are the best hope to lead a genuinely transformative movement in the United States – primarily because most Black Americans are peace-minded, socialism-friendly, and supportive of Black autonomy. But this can only happen if these organizations “put politics in command” and confront the enemy within: the Democratic Party, which is hegemonic in Black America.

“Most Black Americans are peace-minded, socialism-friendly, and supportive of Black autonomy.”

Democratic hegemony does not mean unbeatable. The two most revered Black political icons, Malcolm and MLK, understood that you can’t effectively oppose the white oligarchs without first confronting Black Democrats, who are the ruling class’s first line of defense (and offense) in the Black community. Black Democratic mayors and councilpersons eagerly oversaw local mass Black incarceration regimes in the “chocolate cities” of the Seventies and Eighties – and called it progress. Even a narrow police and prisons abolition movement must politically defeat Black Democrats -- delegitimize them -- if it is to be an enduring force in the community. To grossly paraphrase Malcolm, “You can’t have capitalist hegemony in Black America without Black Democrats.” They are the enemy within.

To take on the corporate imperial racial capitalist state, we need a Black-led movement that puts politics in command and names the perpetrators and collaborators that are culpable in the unfolding, late-stage capitalist disaster, and is capable of presenting a coherent vision of a socialist future in which all peoples rights to self-determination are recognized, and where the people provide for their communal security.

Conditions of life will worsen as the contradictions of racial capitalism deepen. But the ever-consolidating cabal at the top will not give up power out of embarrassment or rocket en mass to Mars; they will have to be overthrown by a mass movement seeking social transformation. United States history dictates that Black folk must lead this movement. That means taking on an end-of-era, global responsibility.

Nobody is ready to take on this mission – but it’s got to be done, anyway.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com .

US capitalism is surely racial capitalism but I would dispute the contention that all capitalism is 'racial' as the supposed examples, the Irish and the Slavs, were both being reduced to serfdom in the pre-capitalist era by the English and the Teutonic Knights, respectively.
Ford must’ve read the book I posted about last year. The “racial capitalism” (capitalism needs racism) model is the prevailing left critique of capitalism these days.“Capitalism NEEDS _______.” Reminds me of a cultural rebranding of Second International determinism.
Great respect for Ford and Dixon(RIP) but BAR has shown a tendency to 'reach' (consider the embrace of the Green Party) and seeing as nothing else is advancing ya can't blame them much. Danny Haiphong's book another example, a restatement of the obvious, dunno if anyone found it useful.(there are plenty folks who need that 'message' but that book ain't going to reach them. Gave a copy to a bright white kid I know and the response was 'meh'.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Wed Feb 17, 2021 3:08 pm

Freedom Rider: Impeachment Theater
Margaret Kimberley, BAR senior columnist 17 Feb 2021

Image
Freedom Rider: Impeachment Theater

Democracy is hanging on by a thread -- not due to marauding Trumpsters – but because of bipartisan support for neoliberal policies.

“The Republicans are a convenient foil who can be blamed whenever the Democrats decide to take a dive.”

The impeachment circus has mercifully come to an end. The public have endured rank hypocrisy and a cynical show meant to give both parties cover for their wrong doing. The Republicans defended Donald Trump on the charge of inciting an insurrection because that’s what their people want them to do. Their rank-and-file members are Trump defenders, and senators took a risk if they voted to convict the man who garnered more than 74 million votes in his losing effort.

As usual the Democrats want to look like an opposition party without really opposing anything. They made media stars of their impeachment managers, who talked a lot about the need to punish Trump for the January 6 Capitol riot and the threat to democracy if that didn’t happen. It wasn’t hard to make the case that Trump’s claims of election theft were the impetus for the mob attack. But in the end they preached to their choir, while hyperventilating over video footage of Mitt Romney and Chuck Schumer running down hallways.

“The Democrats made media stars of their impeachment managers.”

But in the end, they did what their party always does. The plan was to kick Trump while he was down, repeat ad nauseum how bad he is and distract attention from their collusion in the duopoly. Democrats knew they wouldn’t get the two-thirds majority vote in the Senate that was needed to convict. After weeks of hyperbole and a vote to call witnesses, they chose not to in exchange for reading a statement into the record. They made a mockery of claims that the sky was falling.

Cheap praise was the order of the day. Black Capitol police officer Eugene Goodman’s name is now a household word simply because he did what he was paid to do. He led an angry mob away from senators he is charged with protecting. As a result of doing his job he has been lauded by Congress and the media. He was already invited to escort Kamala Harris to the inauguration but the accolades don’t stop.

“Democrats made a mockery of claims that the sky was falling.”

The New York Times calls him a “reluctant hero ” but pours on the propaganda just in case Goodman continues to demur. We learn that he served in the army in Iraq, where he was sent to kill people. (That is the point of the military after all.) According to the Times he was “calm, cool, and collected under fire,” “serious and focused,” yet “quick with a joke,” and that his commanding officer “trusted my life with him.” He and others in the Capitol police force will be given the Congressional Gold Medal, an obscure honor but now useful to the fake opposition as they use bait and switch to cover their tracks.

Meanwhile, the stimulus with its inadequate help for working people winds its way through the process. No wonder democracy is said to be on its last legs. It certainly is, but not because Trump loving yahoos overran the capitol building.

Democracy is hanging on by a thread because of bipartisan support for neoliberal policies. Democrats and Republicans alike depend upon their respective donor classes and do their bidding. If the rulers want workers back on the job, and they do, they certainly don’t want generous income support to become law. That simple fact must be kept hidden with lofty yet phony rhetoric about the U.S. being a good and honorable nation ruined only by the presence of Trump in the White House.

“Democrats and Republicans alike depend upon their respective donor classes and do their bidding.”

The Democrats can always be counted on to give themselves away. After the vote to convict predictably failed, Nancy Pelosi opined, “Our country needs a strong Republican Party.” She needs a strong Republican Party to help cover up her wheeling and dealing. They are a convenient foil who can be blamed whenever the Democrats decide to take a dive. The issue may be Medicare for all, raising the minimum wage, or increasing stimulus payments. Anything that the people need will not be on the agenda.

In a supreme irony of history, the day the trial ended was the 30th anniversary of a U.S. war crime. February 13, 1991, was the day an Iraqi civilian air raid shelter was bombed by U.S. forces. More than 400 people were killed but George H. W. Bush was never impeached for that offense, the rest of the Iraq crime spree, nor for his attack on Panama in 1989.

Impeachments are political affairs, show trials meant to impress the rubes. True criminality that kills people is defended by the political establishment and is never punished. Trump could be impeached for killing thousands of people with sanctions but that will never happen. His crime was becoming the accidental president and continuing to behave as an accidental outsider for the next four years. One doesn’t turn a mob loose in the Capitol without consequence. But this chapter of name calling and finger wagging is over. It is time for Democrats and Republicans to get back to the business of doing nothing that the people need them to do.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/freed ... nt-theater
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Sat Feb 20, 2021 1:09 pm

Lock-step morons edition

Why Do Democrats Pretend Andrew Cuomo Did a Good Job With COVID?
BY BEN MATHIS-LILLEY
FEB 19, 202111:14 AM

<snip>

His press conference performances notwithstanding, the facts and evidence show that Cuomo is not someone who cares much about facts and evidence. But his liberal supporters don’t care: A Siena College poll taken after the nursing home scandal broke found that 83 percent of New York Democrats still approve of Cuomo’s handling of COVID, with more than 80 percent also saying specifically that they approve of his work “communicating with the people of New York” and “providing accurate information.” To hammer home the cognitive dissonance, only 54 percent said he’d done a good job “making public all data about COVID-related deaths of nursing home patients,” which suggests both that 54 percent of New York Democrats are full of it and that a significant portion of the rest of them know Cuomo is full of it but don’t care. To many voters, celebrating the idea of the competent blue-state governor is more important than reckoning with the reality of a serially underachieving chief executive playing three-card monte with dead bodies. At this point, Andrew Cuomo could probably shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and get away with it.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... covid.html

What has gotten into Slate, that paragon of Democratic Party partisanship? I guess some pile of shit are too smelly to ignore. For five years the liberal press has dunked on the 'mindless loyalty' of the 'MAGAs', usually implying that it was an affliction of the stupid working class. Never mind that Trump's true believers are largely of the petty bourgeois who feel their guaranteed promised land slipping away, as usual. Smart Dems would never engage in such thought-free behavior, right? Except mebbe those silly Bernie Bros who profess 'socialism' yet follow their Sheepdog into electoral oblivion. Or the teacher's union...

***************************************

Image

Teachers Union Berated Trump for Reopening Schools, now it’s Praising Biden for Doing the Same
January 23, 2021
By Alan Macleod – Jan 22, 2021

Biden has made the reopening of schools, colleges, and universities a key priority and made clear that his decision was based on the same “save the economy” logic as Trump’s.

The same teachers’ organization that roundly condemned Donald Trump’s attempts to prematurely reopen schools are now applauding Biden’s decision to do the same, even as the coronavirus pandemic reaches new levels.

Joe Biden has made the reopening of schools, colleges, and universities a key priority. On his first full day in office, he signed an executive order “to support the safe reopening and continued operation of schools, child care providers, Head Start programs, and institutions of higher education,” hoping to achieve a near full reopening within 100 days. The order states that the 78-year-old former Delaware senator considers it his duty to “ensure that students receive a high-quality education during the coronavirus.”

The country’s largest labor union, the National Education Association (NEA) came out in strong support of the move. “President Biden’s plan provides great reason for sorely-needed optimism” said the organization’s new president, Becky Pringle. “Educators are encouraged not only by President Biden’s leadership, but also by knowing that there is finally a true partner in the White House who will prioritize students by working with educators in the decision-making process,” she added in an official statement.

The NEA has a close relationship with the Democratic Party. Over 97% of NEA political donations in the last two years went to the Democrats, the organization endorsing Joe Biden for president and calling for Trump’s immediate removal from office earlier this month while putting out official statements mourning the death of liberal icons like Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Indeed, García was reported to be among the front runners for Biden’s pick as Secretary of Education.

This is quite the U-turn from the union, which boasts a membership of nearly 2.3 millioneducators nationwide. In April, as President Trump was attempting to do the same thing, the NEA offered blistering opposition. “Trump’s call to reopen school buildings is dangerous for students [and] staff,” it wrote, condemning the president’s attempts to sacrifice teachers for the sake of reopening the economy.

Similarly, in September, the organization was categorically against Trump’s renewed push to reopen. No one should listen to Trump or his Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, claimed then-NEA leader Lily Eskelsen García, accusing him of “creating more panic for stressed families” and “politicizing” the reopening of schools by linking it with the November election. Yet Biden has made clear that his decision was made on the same “save the economy” logic as Trump’s. When schools are open again, “Think of all the people who can get back to work,” he said, as he signed the order, “all the mothers and single fathers that are staying home taking care of their children.”

While we may know more about the virus now than last year, it seems clear that the pandemic is actually far more out of control now than previously. In late April, the U.S. was averaging 30,248 new cases per day and 2,010 deaths, per Worldometers data. In September, those numbers were 35,934 daily cases and 757 deaths. Today, however, the country can expect to see 193,758 new cases and around 3,176 new deaths. In fact, the ten deadliest coronavirus days have all occurred in the past four weeks. A new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds that the majority of Americans consider the pandemic to be completely out of control.

Biden’s decision also comes at a time when comparable nations are quickly moving in the opposite direction. Authorities in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland, Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands have all announced the closure of schools, despite lower rates of contagion than the U.S. in some cases.

“The problem is not that schools are unsafe for children,” said British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who made the decision to close them for three months, despite previously being adamantly against the idea in principle. “The problem is schools may nonetheless act as vectors for transmission, causing the virus to spread between households.” European studies have shown that, although highly unlikely to be gravely affected by the virus themselves, children are as likely to contract and pass it on as adults, making schools potential superspreading potshots. British teachers are twice as likely to contract the coronavirus as the general population. COVID cases among American educators are also rising. While there are reasons to support reopening, particularly the psychological toll that isolation takes on children and the loss of valuable teaching time, other nations see the virus as a greater danger.

The union’s decision to support school reopening, even as the pandemic hits new heights, might suggest to some that leadership is putting its loyalties towards the party before its membership and giving Democrats a free pass.

Feature Image: Joe Biden speaks at the United Federation of Teachers annual Teacher Union Day, Oct. 20, 2019, in New York. Craig Ruttle | AP

(Mint Press News)

https://orinocotribune.com/teachers-uni ... -the-same/

Admittedly government unions are always in tough spot, being public service, but it is a cleft stick of their own cutting when they bound themselves ankle and wrist to the always treacherous Democratic Party.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Wed Feb 24, 2021 2:56 pm

Biden Plans to “Reinvigorate” a Community Policing Office That Has a Dark History
He wants to give yet more money to a federal office that has helped facilitate abuses in policing.
BY AARON STAGOFF-BELFORT
FEB 24, 20215:45 AM

Image
California Highway Patrol officers block an Interstate 980 off-ramp in Oakland on May 31. Anda Chu/Digital First Media/East Bay Times via Getty Images
President Joe Biden was swept into office amid arguably the largest protest movement in U.S. history, so it’s worth taking a closer look at his chief public safety funding proposal, one that is central to his own legacy on police reform. Biden has promised to “reinvigorate” funding for the Department of Justice’s Community Oriented Policing Services, or COPS, office with a $300 million investment in putting new “community policing” officers on the street. But funneling Department of Justice dollars toward community policing initiatives and the COPS office is the wrong approach if the federal government truly wants to improve public safety and health for communities in this moment. It will neither drive structural changes to American policing nor tackle the root causes of gun violence in cities that have seen a sharp uptick in shootings since the pandemic’s inception.

Instead, the Biden administration should take a hard look at the history of the COPS office and federal spending on so-called community-oriented policing efforts. Community policing initiatives—which seek to emphasize trust and partnership in solving crime between communities and officers who intimately know the neighborhoods they patrol—were a hallmark of the Obama administration’s post-Ferguson-era reform package, but did not prevent another legitimacy crisis for American policing. But the story of COPS is darker than a benign police reform proven ineffective. It has expanded the federal government’s capacity to bankroll some of the more harmful misadventures in modern American policing.

The COPS office was established by the 1994 crime law to provide federal grants to support training and hiring for local community policing efforts. President Bill Clinton argued that lowering crime was the major challenge facing the Department of Justice and the country, and he identified “community policing” as a new frontier for crime fighting: Police had often been viewed as occupiers, but now they would be woven seamlessly into the fabric of neighborhood life. Initially, COPS served as a vehicle for Clinton’s campaign promise to put 100,000 new community police officers on America’s streets (a goal that was not quite met), and averaged more than $1 billion in annual spending. Biden was one of its chief architects in Congress.

While funding stalled to nearly zero in the mid-2000s, the Great Recession revitalized COPS, when Congress allocated $1 billion through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for the office to help local police departments facing budget cuts retain officers. It’s maintained higher appropriation levels since, including over $500 million awarded last year, although the program has not been formally reauthorized by Congress. The office has now funded more than $16 billion for the community policing initiatives of state and local law enforcement agencies.

The rate of federal funding for law enforcement has increased far more than state and local spending, but what has America received for the billions invested in COPS? In a 2001 Baltimore Sun op-ed titled “Bush: Don’t Cut COPS,” then-Sen. Biden called COPS “the most successful crime fighting strategy this nation has ever seen.” He has also claimed that “you can’t find another program as meaningful as the COPS program that has worked so well.”

But there is no universal evidence that COPS has had a considerable impact on violent crime rates, or that it was a leading driver of the great crime decline of the ’90s. A 2017 congressional analysis of research on the effect of COPS hiring grants on crime in the late ’90s concluded that they yielded at best a modest (and potentially no) reduction in crime and may have been less effective in large cities. Another study argued the grants had “little to no effect on crime” in the ’90s. Other congressional research suggested that any potential benefits from crime reduction did not outweigh the program’s cost. One recent, well-designed paper that studied COPS grants through the 2009 stimulus bill (when crime was much lower than in the ’90s, but the economy was in turmoil) found statistically significant reductions in crime. However, the author notes that crime reduction benefits came from maintaining existing staffing levels by avoiding layoffs rather than from adding many new cops on the beat, as was the case with COPS in the ’90s; and that it’s not clear the benefits of the program outweighed the social costs.

While COPS grants’ cost-effectiveness and impact on crime are inconclusive, there is clearer evidence that the office has not served public health and safety in other respects. The COPS office has fueled the rise of police presence in public schools that surged in the ’90s through its Cops in Schools program. Between 1999 and 2005, COPS allocated over $750 million to cities to hire thousands of school police known as school resource officers, or SROs. Less than 20 percent of schools had police in their halls by the mid-’90s, but now most of them do, and this has led to the increased surveillance and criminalization of students—particularly students of color—and the expansion of the “school-to-prison pipeline.” While research has not shown that SROs improve school safety, it has demonstrated that school policing leads to a cascade of collateral consequences for the behavioral health and educational development of children.

Because the provision of the crime bill that created COPS never defined “community policing”—an inherently nebulous concept—the office itself has been able to determine what counts and has put very few restrictions on the nature of police practices and functions it funds. In practice, COPS grants have been used to advance some of the most harmful and aggressive features of modern policing, including the increased militarization of law enforcement and the use of quality-of-life enforcement practices like stop and frisk. Indeed, one of the progenitors of the “Broken Windows” theory has argued that this style of policing is a “core element” of community policing.

In Rise of the Warrior Cop, Washington Post columnist Radley Balko documents how COPS grants were used to hire officers for SWAT raids and specialized tactical units, as departments saw no conflict between strategies that promoted community collaboration in problem-solving and those that emphasized an aggressive, trooplike mentality to fight supposed threats. In The First Civil Right, Naomi Murakawa notes that 60 percent of community policing officers who were surveyed said they spent some, little, or no time on community problem-solving, but 25 percent spent most or all of their time on the “broken windows” style of policing that cities like New York (historically a large COPs grant recipient) began popularizing around the same time as the rise of COPS.

But even when COPS funding has been used for initiatives that are more consistent with the original intention behind community policing, the results have been middling. Policymakers from both sides of the aisle believed that embedding officers in neighborhoods would create more respectful and transparent interactions between police and the public and curb police brutality. COPS dollars went to help support the Obama administration’s National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice, its flagship police reform campaign. An Urban Institute evaluation found that it was not successful in consistently improving police-community relations, much less reducing racial disparities in arrests or use-of-force incidents.

It’s also not clear what unique purpose COPS serves, as one of a number of public safety grant-making agencies housed in the Department of Justice. One congressional study concluded that there was “structural overlap” between the Office of Justice Programs and COPS, and critics have pointed out that other federal programs, like Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants, have been used to subsidize the same local law enforcement activities.

At a five-year retrospective on COPS in 1999, Bill Clinton heaped praise on Biden and implored Congress not to let funding for the program expire: “And it is true that we would never have been able to do this without the leadership of Sen. Biden. … You see Joe Biden up here, full of enthusiasm—wouldn’t it break your heart if it turned out to be wrong?” This victory lap would prove to be premature, even by Biden’s own later standards. Biden’s “Plan for Strengthening America’s Commitment to Justice” claims that COPS “has never been funded to fulfill the original vision for community policing.” But the legacy of COPS is a part of Biden’s own legacy, and it’s unclear where he thinks community policing went wrong, or whether he just thinks we aren’t spending enough money on it.

DOJ grant-making has fueled the growth of militarized and racist tendencies in law enforcement under the amiable name of “community policing” for too long already. Rethinking this failed memento of the Clinton-Biden years could mean reorienting federal public safety spending toward programs that both improve community well-being and shrink the footprint of the criminal legal system. There are more effective and less punitive investments the federal government could make to reduce violence, pursue racial justice, and make communities safer and healthier. President Biden doesn’t have to say “defund the police” to stand in solidarity with Black Lives Matter and other advocates who want to divest from policing and invest in communities; his budget can do the talking for him. Federal spending should nurture the seeds of new community-based public safety systems that are germinating through innovative social programs in municipalities around the country—not more COPS.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/202 ... story.html

Dang, Slate did it again, but with a headline like that ya gotta look...

Thank goodness that Biden is saving us from Trumpian fascism! But as the past two Democratic regimes have made abundantly clear the party that is not the Republicans can do no wrong, be it murdering half a million Iraqi children, poisoning the Gulf of Mexico or reinforcing the impunity of racist cops.

'Progressives' need to take a hard look at the regimes they have given unconditional support in the past and present and decide whose side they are really on.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10773
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Sympathy for the Devils...

Post by blindpig » Wed Mar 03, 2021 2:50 pm

Joe Biden: The Expect Nothing Presidency
Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor 03 Mar 2021

Image
Joe Biden: The Expect Nothing Presidency

Biden’s brand of American exceptionalism has run up against the general crisis of the U.S. imperialist order.

“Celebrations of Kamala Harris and Llyod Austin never come with real policy proscriptions for the masses of Black people.”

Joe Biden’s administration can be more aptly characterized as the “expect nothing presidency.” After defeating Donald Trump last November, Biden has ruled on a platform of “Build Back Better.” This inherently implies that the United States is on the mend from the political turmoil of Donald Trump’s one-term rule.

A return to “pre-Trump” politics in the United States reinforces Biden’s assurance that nothing will fundamentally change for his wealthy donor base. With this assurance, an increasingly uninspiring yet emboldened American exceptionalism has replaced any attempt to analyze the current situation from a historical materialist lens. Biden’s mere presence in the White House is assumed to have cleared the racist, demagogic stain of Trumpism from the United State. The liberal class has reveled in its perceived victory over despotism and political treachery.

“An increasingly uninspiring yet emboldened American exceptionalism has replaced any attempt to analyze the current situation from a historical materialist lens.”

So shortsighted is this liberal class that it cannot (and wouldn’t if it could) acknowledge the obvious contradiction between a presidency that claims to represent the mythical exceptionalism of the United States and the material conditions of the historical moment—conditions that led directly to Trump’s rise in the first place. Biden’s brand of American exceptionalism, replete with “diverse” cabinet members and hollow promises to restore the “soul of the nation,” has run up against the general crisis of the U.S. imperialist order. The first month of Biden’s project of restoration has only further exposed the depths of imperial decay.

On the domestic front, an ongoing pandemic and economic depression has not prevented Joe Biden from strictly adhering to the dictates of austerity. Biden has rejected outright the cancellation of up to $50,000 of student loan debt for the millions of individuals currently paying interest or defaulting on a combined 1.5 trillion dollars’ worth of loans that their meagre wages cannot pay. His promise to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour has also been shelved . Biden also broke his promise to immediately send out $2000 stimulus checks by reducing the amount to $1400 and the delaying the release of the funds to a date to be determined in the Spring.

“An ongoing pandemic and economic depression has not prevented Joe Biden from strictly adhering to the dictates of austerity.”

Broken promises have real material consequences. Biden has already conceded that hundreds of thousands more will die from COVID-19, essentially confessing that his administration has no plans beyond a slow vaccine rollout to curtail the pandemic’s impact. The immense rise in poverty and the decline in life expectancy in the United States will continue unabated. Biden promised to throw out Trump’s immigration policies yet his administration has already built special prisons for migrant children and deported tens of thousands from the United States.

Joe Biden’s foreign policy is perhaps more indicative of his “expect nothing” presidency than anything else. Peace negotiations with the Taliban in Afghanistan have ended. Biden has affirmed both sanctions on Venezuela and the illegitimate U.S. puppet Juan Guaidó as head of state. Haiti’s illegitimate U.S.-installed regime has received firm support from Biden and the administration has thus far refused to re-enter the JPCOA agreement also known as the “Iran nuclear deal.” Biden himself has promised Russia and China that hostility will remain an ongoing feature of U.S. policy toward the two countries. On February 25th, U.S. bombs rained over Syria in a clear signal that the Biden administration would be continuing its decade-long war of occupation and starvation of the Arab nation.

“The immense rise in poverty and the decline in life expectancy in the United States will continue unabated.”

The era of Biden is marked by a return to “business as usual” in Washington. Trump’s erratic rule interrupted the bipartisan consensus of war and austerity by stripping off the mask of American exceptionalism. Biden’s administration is desperately trying to place this mask back on to an increasingly unstable imperialist system. After four years of being repeatedly misinformed by the corporate media that Donald Trump was a Russian-sponsored fascist, the masses are now being gaslit into believing their lives are better off with Biden even as the crises engendered by “business as usual” politics continue to pile on.

The collective sigh of relief that came with the election of Joe Biden included the caveat that the masses would expect nothing from his administration whether promises were made or not. There is perhaps no better example of this than the Biden administration’s approach to Black America. The condition of Black America has always been reflective of the overall design of U.S. imperial rule. Biden has rightfully credited his victory to Black voters but has focused exclusively on the presence of administrative appointees like Kamala Harris to satisfy Black America’s hunger for social and political change. In fact, the mere acknowledgement of racism is being peddled by the Democratic Party as a political victory in and of itself.

“The masses are now being gaslit into believing their lives are better off with Biden even as the crises engendered by ‘business as usual’ politics continue to pile on.”

Yet as Malcolm X foretold, merely acknowledging racism without addressing capitalism is a political dead-end. Racial disparities in poverty, mass incarceration, and across all indicators of social being are the product of a form of class rule that cannot exist without the imposition of race-based exploitation. Biden and his allies in the Black misleadership class have predictably removed power from all political discussion surrounding race. This is why celebrations of Kamala Harris and Llyod Austin never come with real policy proscriptions for the masses of Black people and why Biden’s hostile guarantee not to use executive powers to aid Black America was met with zero opposition from so-called Black “civil rights organizations.” Removing power from popular debate greatly hinders the development of political expectations, and therefore mass movements armed with demands on power. What’s left is political opportunism and class collaboration.

Last November, tens of millions voted for Joe Biden to simply replace Donald Trump. The U.S. ruling class gave Biden and his administration free reign to normalize an “expect nothing” approach to politics among the masses of people. However, the first month of Biden’s administration demonstrates the continued relevance of the materialist conception of history and its emphasis on the struggle between opposing forces that shape political and economic realities. The absence of any expectation for Biden to alter the status quo has been coupled with a proven commitment from the Biden administration to strengthen the status quo’s violent imperialist regime. Only when this is understood can a mass debate about the development of politically Left alternatives to Joe Biden and the Democratic Party truly begin to take shape amid a period of intense crisis in all realms of U.S. imperial rule.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/joe-b ... presidency

With Biden the Dems are begging for a return of Trump and losing both chambers of Congress. It couldn't be otherwise, the Republicans take up all of the air on the Right, the Dems would rather lose than edge an itsy bitsy bit to the Left and the same old shit ain't working for nobody but the 10%. And so the duopoly rolls on until we walk away from the Democratic Party the way the Mayan peasantry walked on their insufferable kings in the 9th century.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply