Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Sun Jan 03, 2021 7:17 pm

Image

Cuba’s Soberana Vaccines Advance Significantly
January 2, 2021 Editor2

December 28, 2020.- In the scientists of the Finlay Institute of Vaccines (IFV) is the expression of the country. You have functioned as a family, united, fought, resisted amid the adversity of the year that is ending, and you have triumphed.

The President of the Republic, Miguel Díaz-Canel Bermúdez , praised the work of the group of researchers, mostly women , during his third visit to the institution, where he was informed about the progress of the Sovereign vaccine in its variants 01 and 02.

I have thought a lot these days about the year that is ending, the hardest year in several decades for Cuba and the world, reflected the president, and you have been part of the great Cuban family, the one that has creatively resisted despite the restrictions he added.

You, he told them, have lived moments of learning, overcome difficult stages and challenges and have come this far. No Third World country has a vaccine in the clinical trial phase against COVID-19 except Cuba , which in turn has no delay with respect to the world in these investigations.

This shows the capacities that the country has created, he pointed out, but there may be capacities in other places, here there are other things that are different, that contribute more, which is the feeling, the commitment to what is done.

To the Finlay family, along with those of the other centers that have worked in the development of Soberana, we express our gratitude for what they have done, and respect and trust in what we are going to continue doing , emphasized Díaz-Canel.

The Director General of the Finlay Institute, Dr. Vicente Vérez, ratified the country’s capacity to immunize the Cuban population against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the first half of 2021. Photo: Estudios Revolución.

Doctor Vicente Vérez Bencomo, general director of the IFV and project leader, reported that the Soberanas have made significant progress in the clinical trial , 01 is ending Phase 1 and 02 enters Phase 2.

Both have shown confidence in terms of safety and immune response. Soberana 02 in particular, due to its characteristics, has shown an early immune response (at 14 days), which allows it to move to Phase 2 of the clinical trial more quickly.

Soberana 01 has also shown safety and a very good immune response, but it is slower due to the time required between one dose and another, which is why it is expected to enter Phase 2 of the clinical trial in February.


When elaborating on the development of Soberana 02, Verez Bencomo explained that in January about a thousand volunteers will be vaccinated in their different formulations , for later, after the evaluations and required permission, enter Phase 3, in which around 150 will participate 000 people in Havana.

Negotiations are also making progress to develop Phase 3 of the Soberana 02 clinical trial in other countries , due to the low prevalence of COVID-19 in the Cuban population.

The Director General of the Finlay Institute ratified the country’s capacity to immunize the Cuban population against the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the first half of 2021.

Reviewing the path of the IFV and other scientific institutions with the Soberana vaccine, which began to be developed last May, the scientist expressed, “it is incredible what we have achieved in seven months.”

Featured Image: Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel praised the work of the group of researchers, mostly women. Photo: Revolution Studies.

(Cubadebate)

Translated by Walter Lippmann.

https://orinocotribune.com/cubas-sobera ... ificantly/

(There was an image error at time I posted, see link.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Tue Jan 05, 2021 3:01 pm

Capitalism:
Amid a devastating Covid-19 surge, Los Angeles County ambulance crews told not to transport patients with little chance of survival
By Alexandra Meeks and Christina Maxouris, CNN

Updated 8:54 AM ET, Tue January 5, 2021

(CNN)Los Angeles County has been fighting a brutal battle against Covid-19 for weeks now.

New infections have soared with about one in five residents who get tested for Covid-19 receiving positive results.
In a little more than a month, the county doubled its number of infections, climbing from about 400,000 cases on November 30 to more than 800,000 cases on January 2, health officials said Monday.
The case deluge has translated to a surge of Covid-19 patients, overwhelming hospitals and plunging intensive care unit capacity across the region to zero. There are now more than 7,600 people hospitalized with Covid-19 in in the county, 21% of whom are in the ICU, officials said
With no hospital beds available, ambulance crews in the county were given guidance not to transport patients with little chance of survival. And the patients who are transported often have to wait hours before a bed is available.
"Hospitals are declaring internal disasters and having to open church gyms to serve as hospital units," Supervisor Hilda Solis said, calling the situation a "human disaster."
And a person is dying of the virus every 15 minutes, Los Angeles County Director of Public Health Barbara Ferrer said.
But it will get worse. Officials say they're headed into the feared surge stemming from holiday gatherings.

(more)

https://us.cnn.com/2021/01/05/us/los-an ... index.html
California, the vanguard 'blue' state. Can't throw all that on Trump no matter how badly they want to.

Meanwhile in socialist China:

Jan 5 China

Image
Latest data released by National Health Commission by midnight, Jan 4, 2021.

- Chinese mainland reports 33 new confirmed COVID-19 cases, with 16 imported, 17 locally transmitted

http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/20210 ... a00ab.html

**********************************************

Beijing curbs new cluster of infection, but fight against virus far from over
By Du Juan | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-01-05 16:50

Image
A health worker (L) registers personal information at a COVID-19 testing site in Shunyi district of Beijing, Jan 3, 2021. [Photo by Zou Hong/chinadaily.com.cn]

Beijing has contained the recent new cluster of COVID-19 cases but the fight is far from final success due to the complicated situation in nearby Hebei province and the ongoing global pandemic, said Xu Hejian, spokesman for the municipal government, at a news conference on Tuesday.

"Some cases have tested with a positive result in nucleic acid testing after 14 days, which has made prevention work even harder," he said.

Beijing reported one new local case on Monday, according to Pang Xinghuo, deputy head of the Beijing Center for Disease Control and Prevention at the news conference.

The case, a 46-year-old female, is a sanitation worker at the Jinma Industrial Park in Shunyi district, the epicenter of the new cluster in Beijing.

Zhi Xianwei, executive deputy head of the district, said by 11 am Tuesday, Shunyi had identified 2,378 close contacts of the previously confirmed cases and all of them are now under centralized medical observation.

Affected by the epidemic in the district, all primary and middle school students in Shunyi, except for final year students in junior and senior high, have started online classes to reduce infection risks.

So far, 395 sample collection spots in the city have collected 2.64 million nucleic acid testing samples since the new local cases occurred, which has helped prevent the virus from spreading.

Compared with sample collection work during the Xinfadi cluster in June last year, the efficiency of sample collection is 5 to 10 times better in the latest round of infection, according to the government.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202101/0 ... a0a07.html

****************************************************************

Biotech firm makes test kit for new virus variant
By Chai Hua in Shenzhen | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-01-05 15:33

BGI Genomics, a Shenzhen-based biotech company, on Tuesday announced the successful development of a rapid detection kit for the new strain of the novel coronavirus, known as SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7, which was originally discovered in the UK.

For COVID-19 positive cases, the company pledged the test kit could further identify and diagnose the new strain's main mutation N501Y in one hour.

BGI stated that the test kit is still only in use for research purposes for now. So far, Guangdong, Shanghai and Hong Kong have found confirmed cases of the new variants on people returning from the UK.

The company is a major producer of test kits and labs for China and the world in the fight against the pandemic.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202101/0 ... a09a3.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Wed Jan 06, 2021 2:36 pm

New study estimates US COVID-19 infections about 4 times of officially reported
Xinhua | Updated: 2021-01-06 09:20

Image
A couple wears face masks and holds hands as they walk the boardwalk on Jan 2, 2021 in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware. [Photo/Agencies]

WASHINGTON - The number of COVID-19 infections in the United States may have been about four times of the figure officially reported, according to a new study published on Tuesday.

As of Nov 15, about 11 million COVID-19 cases were reported to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, the study suggested the actual number of infections was about 46.9 million.

More than 14 percent of the US population were infected by SARS-CoV-2 by mid-November, according to the study published in the medical journal JAMA Network Open.

The study also suggested that approximately 35 percent of COVID-19 deaths may not be reported.

The number of reported cases is an underestimate of the true number of persons with infection because many persons with symptomatic COVID-19 either do not seek medical care or are not tested and therefore are not included in tallies of COVID-19 infections reported to public health authorities, said the study.

Furthermore, an estimated 40 percent of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic and unlikely to be tested and reported, according to the study.

The researchers tested randomly selected blood samples for the presence of COVID-19 antibodies in a series of surveys conducted in states as well as nationwide.

They derived estimates for the number of infections, hospitalizations and deaths in the country as of Nov 15 by comparing antibody prevalence in the samples to the number of reported cases to adjust for underreporting.

"The SARS-CoV-2 disease burden may be much larger than reported COVID-19 cases owing to underreporting," said the study.

http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/20210 ... a0bb4.html

Hmm, not a word of this on the CNN site. In case ya didn't know:
JAMA Network Open is a monthly open access medical journal published by the American Medical Association covering all aspects of the biomedical sciences. It was established in 2018 and the founding editor-in-chief is Fred Rivara. Wikipedia
Funny, doncha think? Goddamn commie propaganda, I guess.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Fri Jan 08, 2021 2:55 pm

Hospitals in Ecuador and Peru Collapse Due to Lack of Beds

Image
Health workers check on COVID-19 patients at a hospital in Lima, Peru, Jan. 7, 2021. | Photo: EFE

Published 8 January 2021 (2 hours 26 minutes ago)

Peruvian authorities acknowledged that only 233 out of 1,546 ICU beds are currently available in their country.

Health authorities in Peru and Ecuador on Thursday reported a surge in demand for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds at their hospitals, which suggests that both countries are facing a COVID-19 rebound.

"We have started counting them on our fingers," Peru's Health Minister Pilar Mazzetti warned, reporting that a group of experts believe the country is experiencing a second wave of contagion.

Hospitals' situation is critical. On January 5, only 233 out of 1,546 beds were available, according to '"Open COVID Peru", a group that analyzes data reported by health authorities.

"Private clinics are on the verge of collapse. Only state-owned hospitals are sustaining the demand," Open COVID Peru Director Juan Carbajal assured.

On Tuesday, the Ombudsman's Office warned that only 21 ICU beds were available in all of Lima.


In December, bed occupancy was equivalent to the number that occurred in late May and mid-June, when the country reported the highest peak of the pandemic.

In Ecuador, the epidemiological situation has also worsened. On Thursday, hospitals in Santo Domingo, Ambato, Cuenca, and Ibarra reported that they ran out of beds for seriously ill patients.

"All ICU beds have been occupied since the end of December. Hospitals report an increase from 40 to 94 weekly admissions," Health Ministry stated.

The 24 ICU beds of the In Tsachilas province are full. So far, 128 patients were moved to hospitals in the neighboring Guayaquil province.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Hos ... -0003.html

*********************************************

In Cuba, All International Travelers to Receive Nasalferon

Image
The application Nasalferon will begin in Cuba for all international travelers and their relatives. The drug prevents the replication of COVID-19 and considerably strengthens people's immune system. | Photo: Twitter/@PeriodicoGiron

Published 7 January 2021 (16 hours 35 minutes ago)

As of Thursday, Cuba will begin administering to all international travelers and their relatives Nasalferon, a drug produced by the nation's biotechnology industry, to prevent the replication of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and strengthen their immune systems.


As announced during a session of Havana's Provincial Defense Council, the medicine will be administered in Boyeros and Diez de Octubre's municipalities. It then will be extended gradually to the rest of the capital city.

The director of Science and Technological Innovation at the Ministry of Public Health, Ileana Morales, explained that a drop of Nasalferon would be administered nasally in the morning and another one at night for a period of five to ten days.

Nasalferon is a recombinant human IFN-alpha-2b-formulation for nasal administration that, given to the immunomodulatory and antiviral properties of IFN-alpha, protects individuals against exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Morales pointed out that the traveler's cohabitants shall begin the treatment regimen three days before visitors' arrival at their home.
Cuba will begin administering Nasalferon to travellers in order to lower the transmition of COVID due to tourism. This pharmaceutical destroys the replication ability of SARS-CoV-2 in the respiratory system via a nasal spray. https://t.co/k3DdlsPWyW

Cuban specialists assure that the medicine prevents the virus' replication and modifies the number of colonies found in the body.

Nasalferon, they claim, also strengthens the immune system and ensures that if the person is infected with the pathogen, they will not develop severe symptoms, experts stated.

Data from the Cuban Academy of Sciences show that up until August 17, 241 Cuban health workers and 1,010 vulnerable people (elderly patients and those suffering from comorbidities or from indirect exposure to the virus) had been treated with the drug and showed positive results.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/In- ... -0020.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Thu Jan 21, 2021 12:21 pm

NORWAY REPORTS 23 DEATHS FROM PFIZER-BIO NTECH VACCINE APPLICATION
18 Jan 2021 , 11:45 am .

SHARE
According to the Norwegian authorities, at least 23 people have died shortly after receiving the first dose of the vaccine against covid-19 developed by the American pharmaceutical company Pfizer and the German laboratory BioNTech. The pharmaceutical company stated that this should not cause panic, since "the number of accidents so far is not alarming and is in line with forecasts."

Norway has given at least one dose of Pfizer's vaccine to some 33,000 people, targeting those considered to be most at risk, including the elderly. According to Bloomberg, of the 29 cases of possible side effects investigated by Norwegian authorities, almost three-quarters were in people 80 years of age and older.

“The large studies on Comirnaty (BioNTec / Pfizer) did not include patients with unstable or acute illnesses, and they included few participants over 85 years of age. In Norway we are now vaccinating the elderly and people in nursing homes with serious underlying diseases, therefore it is expected that deaths close to the time of vaccination may occur. In Norway, an average of 400 people die each week in nursing homes and long-term care facilities, ”declared the Norwegian regulator (Statens Legemiddelverk Norway)

After the "doubts" that were constantly pointed out in the media regarding the SputnikV vaccine, the reality has turned out to be vastly different. The results of the application of the Pfizer-Bio Ntech vaccine in the elderly population, at least in the case of Norway, opens a new episode in the investigation of its side effects in this age group. Last December, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began an investigation into five allergic reactions that occurred in people who received the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine.

The overall situation is one of new uncertainty, given that stocks for vaccines and their effects have already spread through various digital channels among the population, with the rise of notorious anti-vaccine sectors in various countries. This situation could lead to large groups deciding not to be vaccinated, thus encouraging the continuation of the pandemic.

The regrettable findings now in Norway, demand that the authorities raise more information and adapt the protocols for the application of these drugs in the elderly and in vulnerable health conditions.

https://misionverdad.com/noruega-report ... -bio-ntech

Google Translator

*************************************************

ITALY VOWS TO SUE PFIZER FOR FAILURE TO DELIVER VACCINES
17 Jan 2021 , 12:33 pm .

Italy's special commissioner for the coronavirus emergency, Domenico Arcuri, has issued a statement to Pfizer repudiating the "unilateral" statement from the pharmaceutical company to reduce the distribution of doses of vaccines against covid-19 in Italy by 29%. Arcuri stressed that the decision was not discussed with the Italian State and requested that the immediate reestablishment of the amounts, warning that "any consequential action in all places" was reserved to preserve the health of the Italians.

Pfizer's unexpected announcement of the drug's distribution cut includes all of Europe. As of Monday, January 18, and probably in the following weeks, around 130 thousand fewer doses will arrive in Italy than had been agreed, going from 470 thousand to about 340 thousand.

"It has not only unilaterally decided in which administration centers in our country the vials sent will be reduced and to what extent. All countries of the European Union have received a similar communication. Pfizer has also announced that it cannot predict whether this decrease in supplies will continue in the coming weeks, let alone to what extent, "wrote Arcuri.

Reducing the pace of shipments will jeopardize the progress of the vaccination campaign that began in Italy at the end of December. Since then, the first of the two doses of the vaccine has been applied to people over 80 years of age and health personnel.

Italy is the country hardest hit in Europe by the virus with 71 thousand deaths of the 540 thousand that have occurred in Europe. Herd immunity will come when between 75 and 80% of the population has been vaccinated.

Only two vaccines for the coronavirus have been authorized by the European Union, that of Pfizer in collaboration with BioNTech and that of Moderna. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently received documentation of the operation of the vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford and it is expected that by January 29 it will authorize its commercialization.

https://misionverdad.com/italia-promete ... de-vacunas

Google Translator

It seems that Pfizer, like it's departed benefactor, has seriously 'over-sold' it's capacity to deliver the goods. And given that one wonders if Biden's vow of 100M doses in 100 days has got anything to do with short falls elsewhere. Happily China, Cuba and Russia will be proving most of the world with what is needed with less costs and complications.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:40 pm

Image

Bidenfreude: COVID-19 in post-Trump U.S.
Posted Jan 21, 2021 by Rob Wallace

Originally published: Climate & Capitalism (January 16, 2021) |
A jokester once characterized Yale University as a hedge fund with a campus attached to it. One might say something similar of the country in which Yale is based.

The United States is abandoning what recently deceased political scientist Leo Panitch described as its responsibilities in managing global capitalism for the bourgeoisie worldwide. With public health and other earmarks of the modern state abandoned within even its own borders, the U.S. seems now more a stock market with a country attached.

It’s true, on the other hand, that the magical thinking of never-ending economic growth has long-anchored the American political ethos in settler expansionism. Nothing is more important than perpetual growth. Everything else—even our shared humanity and life on Earth itself—is to be subsumed under that prime directive.

But this year’s COVID-19 outbreak alerted the world of a nation’s identity turned inside-out like a smelly sock. Rome wasn’t built in a day, but the U.S.’s nearly as fast a fall, however part of a longue durée decline from the its peak as a center of capital, should flabbergast even the sharpest of radical observers. For even a Biden administration may prove no prophylaxis for the COVID-19 outbreak and American decline overall.

Graphic content
The potion of economic growth did not save the day during the pandemic. Those countries that kept their economies opened at the expense of its population’s morbidity and mortality—the U.S., Mexico, Chile, Belgium, among others—suffered worse COVID-19 outbreaks and greater economic losses.

Wealth, on the other hand, remained protected, growing in record draughts and in ever greater concentration. Over the pandemic, March to December, the collective wealth of America’s 651 billionaires grew by more than one trillion U.S. dollars. That’s nearly four times the $267 billion in one-shot stimulus checks sent to 159 million Americans earlier in the year.

One can’t help but be outraged. Toward the end of the year, a graph circulated online showed a direct relationship between daily S&P Index closings for the top 500 companies’ stock prices listed on the exchange and accumulative COVID-19 deaths in the U.S.

On its face, such a vulgarity of “dying for the market” seems a spurious correlation. Accumulative cases are always going to rise. So we might better plot the S&P and COVID-19 hospitalizations for days the market was open, in this case, in the nearby plot, for March 17-Dec 18. Hospitalizations ping up and down upon each Covid wave, marking the immediate state of the outbreak better than cumulative caseload.

We can see here stock prices split through the first two U.S. COVID-19 waves, with different closings in the index—high and low—at the same level of hospitalizations. It appears upon the start of each COVID-19 wave stock prices shorted, bouncing back only on the wave’s decline. Research earlier in the outbreak showed just such a negative bias in stock closings, depressing the index more upon bad COVID-19 news than the amount it bounced back upon good.

So the market does react to news in the real world, even as financialization—investing in debt and currency—is increasingly divorced from the real economy (and the vast majority of people’s everyday lives). Or, in the more updated interpretation, as financialization increasingly drives the real economy regardless of the various perverse outcomes.

Geographer Albina Gibadullina recently plotted financialization by industrial sector across countries. The state of alienation in the U.S. across sectors is such that betting on the debt backing the economy increasingly supersedes outright investment in real commodities. Sudden disasters don’t roll our high-end gamblers back to reality, however. Not even back to the capitalist reality of the kinds of use value that might seem necessary to protect a system in crisis.

Sociologist John Bellamy Foster and colleagues describe financialization picking up in pace during the worst of damage brought about by the present pandemic. The resulting impacts aren’t felt just in stock portfolios or bond derivatives. With less revenue from elective surgery and other blows to projected profits, U.S. hospitals, for instance, are firing nurses during the worst outbreak in a hundred years.

Our S&P graph suggests that at the other end of the outbreak, even as hospitalizations are exploding in record number, with the vaccines rolling out and a Biden administration rolling in, things, from the vantage of capital, may be looking up. Capital will survive—even prosper—through half-a-million U.S. deaths its professional-managerial class largely dodged by staying at home.

So we may have here a positive bias later in the outbreak. Terrible news on the daily doesn’t depress stocks now that the bourgeoisie appears in the clear.

Here, then, we find ourselves back at the vulgar interpretation we thought we’d circumvent in favor of nuance. Because the rest of the U.S. is in terrible shape. Three-to-four times more of the population is hungry than an already unconscionable baseline. Millions have filed for inadequate unemployment insurance. Shoplifting of staples like food and diapers is at record levels. Tens of thousands of Covid deaths, more than that of many countries combined, have been attributed to housing evictions alone.

The overall trend apparent even in our rough graph from March to December—up, up, up—supersedes the dynamics of the stock market’s blips here and there. The resulting massacre—Covid and otherwise—is teaching Americans an abject lesson, at least for those in a position to assimilate it.

The extreme center’s gambit
The lesson can be so easily lost. The tumult of a political class at odds with itself forces the country to choose sides that are not of its own making.

The hard part is not letting January’s Trumpist putsch and the second impeachment that followed confuse matters. Certainly these histories count and defeating the fascist creep is always a front-and-center task. The roiling itself speaks to the bourgeoisie’s struggles with administering an empire in decline home and abroad.

But we need to keep in mind that politicians of both major parties—Democratic and Republican—spent this past year organizing themselves around simultaneously bailing out billionaires, now far richer than ever in only a few short months, and minimizing paying the poorest of Americans trying to survive a deadly pandemic.

Congress passed a lousy $1,200 of assistance per American earlier in 2020. It then dragged its ass for months at the end of the year before finally agreeing on another $600. A push to up the second payout to $,2000 was turned aside in the name of fiscal responsibility. The debate was cut off with a vote in favor of a military budget greater than the world’s next ten largest military budgets combined. Biden’s latest offer to fold in another $1,400 nowhere near approaches what smaller countries have been offering their citizens monthly from the pandemic’s start.

The lesson couldn’t be clearer. Under this system, Americans are to be given money to reproduce themselves only in the course of helping capital accumulate. Not even a pandemic is enough to interrupt imposing social identities tied largely to company productivity. People will just have to die if their living disrupts the very expropriation that brought about the pandemic.

In short, the present U.S. system is a death cult. And it isn’t administered just by Trump administrators propounding herd immunity into late summer, but by an incoming administration ready to get people back to work with vaccines that appear unlikely to stop transmission.

The irony is that a system that for decades neglected public health as a commons, and so upon COVID-19 was unable to administer nonpharmaceutical interventions, may now display a remarkable incapacity to distribute a pharmaceutical one it took such pride in producing.

In refusing to pay and protect the populace in its time of sacrifice, the political class may have lost the public’s trust. And the contacts and networks needed to connect people mind and body to public health as a shared fate were long destroyed for an S&P that the Biden administration aims to protect.

Even months before inauguration, Biden and his COVID-19 response embodied as much of the epoch’s exhausted spirit as Trump. While Trump represents the system’s id, Biden campaigned as its science-touting superego, only now, once elected, he’s back to acting its trap of a structurally imposed ego.

Capitalist realism, as far down as its alienated bedrock of climate collapse and dehumanizing labor markets, is at this point as delusional as the flat-Earthism it looks down upon and the ecomodernism—thinking technology enough to reverse climate change—to which it gravitates.

If the extreme center cannot hold, it is because in its ideological policing, blocking any alternative to the present shitshow, it appears, on the one hand, on track to accelerating civilization’s environmental crash. On the other hand, its celebrated failures of imagination open the way to the rise of more competent fascists.

Every step along the way the center champions “building back better” for the settler billionaires first and foremost. Even during COVID-19, the wealthy’s successes continue to destitute much of the world, global North and South. And yet former president Barack Obama spent 2020 campaigning against even a whiff of socialist or liberationist amelioration—intervening against the Bernie Sanders campaign, Black Lives Matter, the NBA wildcat strike, and the Squad of democratic socialist representatives in Congress.

Obama’s purring negation emerged out of the same insipid source as Biden’s decision to rehire agribusiness lobbyist Tom Vilsack for Secretary of Agriculture. With whole swaths of rural countryside enraged enough by the damage of neoliberal agriculture to flirt with fascism. Now that is some inspired thinking there! Let’s return the U.S. back to the conditions that brought about Trump in the first place.

Bidenfreude—relief in Trump’s defeat but little joy—offers no exit out of the existential trap the men from Hope (here and here) spring upon the American electorate every four years.

The only egress is disconnecting out of the neoliberal imaginarium. There are thousands of years of alternate paradigms—Indigenous, smallholder, working class—at fundamental odds with the present political class’s tottering brinkmanship. It’s time to start parsing through these alternatives, experimenting with them anew, whatever the lengths to which the Yale-educated and other “best and brightest” scold us.

Pragmatic Interventions Require Radical Utopianism
Escaping the head space (and programmatic options) neoliberalism imposes for far better socioecological pastures, where people and place are treated as more than their productivities—that’s the pandemic path forward.

As I’ve described in greater detail elsewhere, once there, pragmatic interventions, in this case for COVID-19, flow as a matter of course:

* Go for the knockout. Aim for the kind of total COVID-19 suppression other countries far less wealthy were able to complete in a matter of months without a vaccine.

* Scale up community health for the pandemic we have (not the one we wish we had). Scale up hospital capacity, testing, contract tracing, and vaccine and PPE distribution—all made free to the public—to match the numbers SARS-CoV-2 is operating with, not what the capitalist state cares to pay for. That is, unlike Trump and now Biden, follow what science models is a proper intervention.

* Suspend capitalism. Quarantines don’t work if only the rich can stay home. Pay people who are working non-essential jobs to stay home. Pause their rent, mortgages, and debts. Feed them from municipalized restaurants and food trucks. Check in on them with millions of newly hired community health workers. Pay essential workers hazard pay and supply enough PPE and vaccine so that, as was reported here and here, they don’t have to fistfight over what’s available.

* Celebrate the pandemic’s end. Continue to pay people to take a couple weeks off to celebrate society’s victory over an existential threat. We should consecrate the end of the scourge as a repudiation of capitalism’s death march through our lives and its role in driving the emergence of pandemic strains to begin with. Looking around the wreckage, we might discover we prefer this new option.

* Reintroduce agriculture and nature. To keep Covid-21, -22, and -23 from emerging next, whether as another SARS or as an avian influenza, Ebola, African swine fever, or any of the hundreds of potential protopandemics, we must end global agribusiness, logging, and mining as we know them. We need to reintroduce the mosaic food landscapes of complex ecologies and agrobiodiversities that disrupt the evolution of the deadliest of pathogens.

* Return rural sovereignty. Such interventions require returning rural communities their locus of control. We must turn to the kind of state planning that centers farmer autonomy, community socioeconomic resilience, circular economies, integrated cooperative supply networks, food justice, land trusts, and reparations. We must undo deeply historical race, class, and gender trauma at the center of land grabbing and environmental alienation.

* Imagine humanity beyond the market. Such a political reordering requires that we end the unequal ecological exchange between the Global North and South. It requires that we plant a different political philosophy in the landscape, making a better balance of humanity’s appropriation of Earth’s resources and healing the metabolic rift between ecology and economy.

So seven points to start. With much more to do. But look what we can begin to think through when the Obamas, Trumps and Bidens of the world, whether in the flesh or in our own heads, are unable to interrupt us.

https://mronline.org/2021/01/21/bidenfr ... trump-u-s/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Fri Jan 29, 2021 1:24 pm

THE EUROPEAN POPULATION AS MEAT OF PREY

VACCINES AS AMMUNITION: PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES TAKE EUROPE BY THE NECK
29 Jan 2021 , 7:23 am .

Image
The low supply of vaccines by pharmaceutical companies has generated conflicts between the EU and member countries (Photo: AFP)

The appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus gave a glimpse of the fragility of health systems in the world, even in countries that were considered avant-garde due to their public health networks. European nations such as Italy, France, Spain, Germany, England, among others, were collapsed by the high volume of infected by Covid-19 that required to be treated in Intensive Care Units (ICU).

But Covid-19 not only showed the fragility of the health systems of the Global North, it also revealed the predatory nature of the system that governs them. Once the pandemic became the center of events, the primary common goal was to try to find a solution to return to "normality". And one of them was trying to make a vaccine.

THE START OF THE RACE
This fact became a race not only to find a solution to a pandemic with multifactorial consequences, but also for who would exert the greatest geopolitical influence from then on.

Since March last year, the first steps have been taken through multilateral organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) for a joint solution, but also, as expected, an insane race driven by the logic of the market, which implied a tripped competition where the right to life lost relevance.

In this contest, the large pharmaceutical corporations came into play in a kind of cold war in which the most powerful countries also played a role according to their neoliberal nature: whoever managed to get the vaccine was going to capitalize on its commercialization, and whoever had more resources, it would have a better chance of hoarding more immunizations.

However, not everything operated with this logic. Also from the beginning of the pandemic there was cooperation between nations to seek a joint solution and a slightly more hopeful vision in the midst of the disaster. Such is the case of countries like China, Russia, Cuba, among others, which put their scientific-technological advances at the service of the local population and in other latitudes.

A glaring case of this was evidenced in cooperation with Venezuela, in the midst of the fiercest unilateral blockade, which even intensified with the arrival of the pandemic.

BIG PHARMA AND THE WEST
Faced with the challenge of finding a solution to contain the pandemic that exposed the structural crisis, the natural symbiosis between the West and the large pharmaceutical corporations congregated in Big Pharma was glimpsed , an elite that concentrates in a few the largest manufacture of vaccines in the world.

A few months later, the race to find the vaccine was already in full swing. On the one hand, China and Russia leading the discourse of solidarity, and on the other, the pharmaceutical corporations, the majority of them American, each one trying to conquer the market.

These two ways of looking at the historical moment would be decisive for, later on, understanding the consequences of leaving something as vital as the manufacture of a vaccine in the logic of the market.

When vaccine manufacturers began to show progress, the race to acquire them began. The rich countries played ahead and disbursed large amounts of dollars for the purchase of immunizations. Although the objective was to protect its citizens, the hope was also maintained that this immunization would serve to return to the lost "normality" and, therefore, the economic recovery.

Image
Pharmaceutical corporations have taken European institutions by the neck (Photo: Tarbell)

WAR DIRTY?
In this scavenger logic, the stigma also operated on those who from a certain point were competing against that logic, and not because they really wanted to compete, but because the fact of having a more solidary vision already represented losses for the pharmaceutical elites. Such is the case with China and Russia, the Western scapegoats of these times. Wasn't the "Chinese virus" and "Russian vaccine" patented as "negative propaganda" against these nations?

In this competition, the aforementioned countries play a determining role. Of the 17 candidate vaccines against Covid-19 registered by the WHO, more than half are from China and one of the most efficient, with 92% effectiveness, is Sputnik V, from Russia.

With the second wave of Covid-19 in late 2020 and early 2021 (apparently they did not learn the lesson of last year, when Europe became the epicenter of the pandemic with catastrophic consequences), the acquisition of vaccines became a priority issue and the seams began to show.

Of the European Union (EU) only the name remained, because in the middle of the disaster the least there was was unity and solidarity between nations. Trips, conspiracies and hoarding was most notable with the pandemic in cultured and civilized Europe, the cradle and pride of Western civilization.

Although it is not a European country, the case of Israel is a glaring example of the hoarding of the rich countries. The Zionist state has bought 24 million doses from different pharmaceutical companies, even though the vaccinable population is 6 million, for which 12 million are required, assuming that double doses must be applied.

FAILURES IN PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION
This year, vaccine manufacturers' non-compliance with their commitments with European countries became more evident. The question of whether they could meet global demand increased the despair of nations.

Earlier this year, Italy , the nation hardest hit by the pandemic in Europe, promised to sue Pfizer for reducing the distribution of doses in that country by 29%, interfering with the vaccination scheme that began last year. The German-American pharmaceutical company applied the cut to the entire continent.

This situation is repeated in Germany. According to a German media, "the European Union and Germany could fall short of vaccine supplies. The delay in signing contracts with pharmaceutical companies could mean that the vaccines are late, as well as that they are not enough," says Der Spiegel .

The outgoing Washington administration aimed to vaccinate 20 million Americans in the coming weeks, which could explain the supply failure and diversion of inputs in the Global North. According to the German authorities, it is required that at least 70% of the population be vaccinated.

Of the 1.3 billion doses ordered by the European Union, only those from BioNTech / Pfizer (United States-Germany) and Moderna (also from the United States) are insured. Between Pfizer and Moderna they would supply some 60 million vaccines to Germany.

The four vaccine manufacturers contracted by the Europeans are experiencing delays in their production. The Anglo-Swiss AstraZeneca interrupted its trials (its effectiveness is questionable) at the same time it unexpectedly announced that it would deliver 60% fewer doses of the vaccine in 2021 than the planned 400 million; and France's Sanofi postponed approval of its vaccine until the end of 2021.

According to the German media Bild , the health of Germany, France, Italy and the Netherlands tried, in the middle of last year, to break the EU rules by trying to make their own purchases of vaccines, but the heads of state bowed to the designs from Brussels.

This demonstrates not only the ineffectiveness of pharmaceutical companies, but also the inability of the European multilateral body to respond to its member states. In this scenario, it is worth saying that until recently only two vaccines against coronavirus had been authorized by the EU: that of Pfizer in collaboration with BioNTech and that of Moderna, which leaves out Sputnik V. So far there are no pleading that explains the reasons.

Recently, the jump published "The crossed out secrets of the contracts of purchase of vaccines of the European Commission", regarding the pressure against the European Commission (CE) that manages the acquisition of vaccines in the continent. However, in the document they cross out important details that could reveal corruption schemes around a process in which the lives of millions on that continent are at stake.

Suspension of payments, non-compliance, diversion of vaccines to other countries, delay in deliveries, threat of lawsuits, among others, have characterized the handling of the immunization process against Covid-19 in Europe.

"What measures, times or other conditions do the contracts that the EC has signed with these companies have?" Asks Yago Álvarez Barba, author of the article. The truth is that apparently not even the MEPs seem to be aware of what is happening.

"The EC has denied showing these contracts, claiming that they contain sensitive information. In the same way as it was done with the great free trade agreements, such as TTIP or CETA, MEPs only had one way to access one of those contracts: in a closed room, without the help of any consultant, without a camera or telephone and signing a confidentiality contract. In addition, MEPs had a maximum time of 50 minutes, for which they had to sign up for a long list of representatives with the same intention, to analyze a document of more than 60 pages. In addition, as reported by several parliamentarians who had access to the contract, it was full of tachons that censored important parts.

Important details such as the amount of supplies required for large-scale immunization and the cost of the vaccines are blacked out and kept secret.

"The Product will be supplied in the form of XXX which will require a XXX. However, the characteristics of the container (final presentation) are still under consideration. The XXX will probably be presented in boxes of XXX and the XXX. The container will also include XXX. expects the injected volume for a dose to be 0.5 ml (after dilution) ", refers to a contract that corresponds to an agreement with CureVac, the German company that is behind in the testing and approval of the vaccine.

No country in the Global South expects solidarity from Europe, but the fact that it does not exist between them demolishes the myth of the unity of the old continent. The pandemic shows, in addition to the fragility of health systems, the scavenging attitude of the system that governs them and which they claim to be an example for the rest of the world.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/va ... -el-cuello

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Tue Feb 02, 2021 3:40 pm

An ancient principle of justice points to solutions for today’s four-fold mega-crisis

Image

by Elliot Sperber

While it isn’t clear how many people have lost their lives to COVID-19 in the US (is it under 400,000 still? Over 500,000 yet?) it is more clear than ever that we are experiencing a continent-wide public health catastrophe.

Perhaps this is unsurprising. After all, the US has a health care system designed not for the public good but for the private good, for profit. A fundamental conflict of interests, the generation of profits, by law, prevails over the provision of care, and has resulted in fewer hospital beds over the years, lack of basic equipment, chronic understaffing, and other deprivations of care.

All of these cuts to public health explain why the pandemic has devastated the US while killing very few people in places with robust public health infrastructure, such as South Korea.

But it isn’t simply the case that our public health crisis (which includes heart disease, obesity, cancer and sleep deprivation epidemics, among others) results from an austerity-based neoliberal political-economic model; our political-economy itself constitutes a vast public health crisis.

From a critical public health perspective the crisis of the pandemic, the economic crisis and the political crisis (of which mass incarceration and systemic police brutality are only among the more visible afflictions), and the ecological crisis all ultimately comprise one four-fold public health mega-crisis.

Relevantly, the concept of the crisis has its roots in medicine. For Hippocrates and Galen, and well into modern times, a crisis referred to a moment in the development of a disease when a physician could intervene, stop the disease’s progress, and heal the patient.

And, as Galen certainly knew, Asclepius — the archetypal healer of the ancient world, the son of a god who could raise the dead, restore sight to the blind, and was killed for transgressing the order of the day — had a daughter named Hygieia. Known to the Romans as Salus, this name for the offspring of Asclepius (a mythical healer herself) manifests in the ancient maxim salus populi suprema lex esto.

More than just the state motto of Missouri, salus populi suprema lex esto — the health of the people should be the supreme law — is fundamental to this society’s political, moral, and legal thought. Predating not only the Bill of Rights but the Magna Carta by centuries, it has been cited by politicians and thinkers from Cicero to John Locke to FDR, and just recently by Boris Johnson.

More than a fancy-sounding ancient Latin trope, the maxim possesses legal power. Indeed, as a constitutional metanorm it has been employed by courts in the United States and elsewhere on thousands of occasions as grounds to both nullify and create law.

As such, we might wonder why, in the midst of our fourfold mega-crisis ravaging the globe this maxim linking people’s health to not just law but the supreme law isn’t receiving greater attention.

As Mary Beard, Cambridge University Professor of Classics, pointed out when commenting on Boris Johnson’s glib use of it a few months ago, the maxim was used during the Roman Empire to pursue what she compared to national security, as opposed to anything resembling social security.

What she did not mention is that modernly the maxim has been used for centuries to justify democratic, egalitarian politics.

From rejecting the pauperizing Enclosure Acts and supporting Parliament against the Crown during the English Civil War in the mid-17th century, to justifying independence from the British Empire in Britain’s North American colonies in the 18th century (and, arguably, manifesting later in the general welfare clauses of the US Constitution), to pursuing basic public health policies in the US in the 19th and 20th centuries, the maxim has been central, rhetorically as well as legally.

Though examples from our deeply troubled past are no doubt problematic, a consideration of the maxim’s history contains much of relevance to today’s crises.

During the late 18th century, for instance, South Carolina courts used the maxim to justify canceling people’s war debts. The health of the people should be the supreme law, they argued, freeing debtors from health-sapping burdens — an important precedent that should be invoked today in support of canceling student loan debt, consumer debt, and other obstacles to people’s economic, psychological, and physical health.

Throughout the 19th century and beyond, the maxim was used repeatedly to shut down industries such as tanneries and slaughterhouses that harmed the environment and threatened public health. Where such enterprises (generally limited then to the sphere of nascent industry, with the deeper diseases of imperialism, patriarchy and slavery overlooked) conflicted with public health, the latter prevailed every time over private property rights. Because the police power was used to protect public health, and not eminent domain, monetary compensation (just or otherwise) was not required.

In other words, the maxim could be used today to ban the fossil fuel industry outright, among other ecocidal operations.

More than a moral argument, this is a practical, legal one. More than merely negating ecocidal institutions, among others that harm human and ecological health, the maxim can be used to justify positive rights to the material conditions of health.

More than merely Walter Benjamin’s emergency brake, which halts the ecocidal storm of progress, allowing the angel of history to close its wings and land, the maxim enables the angel of history to do what it desires to do but has been prevented: making whole what has been destroyed, i.e. healing the world.

While defining health remains something of a minefield of normative problems, there are nevertheless certain basic conditions of health that apply universally, and about which no reasonable person can disagree.

For instance, everyone (all people the world over, not just white people or rich men) at minimum require clean water, nutritious food, safe housing, health care, and a clean environment, free from police violence, and other forms of institutional violence, and unnecessary stress, to be healthy.

If the public’s health is the supreme law, as the maxim asserts, then the lack of these basic conditions not only poses an impediment to public health but constitutes a violation of the supreme law. Unhealthy conditions, then, give rise to a duty to correct conditions of disease and create conditions of health (in a manner congruent with the health of the greater environment). Housing, nutritious food, clean water, a clean environment, etc., must be created, to comply with the supreme law.

These conditions must not be produced for profit (as a means to something else) but as ends in themselves, for the sake of health. According to this reading of the maxim, this is a society’s job. It has a duty of care to fulfill this function. Rather than pursuing endless economic growth, pumping billions into the military, spreading war, pollution, and disease across the globe in the extraction of profits, the maxim exhorts us to invest our vast resources into creating conditions of health.

A politics that embraces this reading of the maxim (that the health of the people, all people, should be the supreme law) would not have all the answers to our spiraling four-fold public health mega-crisis. It doesn’t take keen vision to see that healing society requires more than simply eradicating a virus. Beyond masks, testing, contact tracing, vaccines, and other immediate interventions, a sincere commitment to public health requires, at a minimum, universal healthcare — the norm in much of the so-called developed world. It also requires ridding society of the political-economic conditions that produce these pandemics, not to mention our accelerating ecological catastrophe, in the first place.

As it concerns health in anything beyond an instrumental sense (Heidegger defined the Nazis’ concept of health as the capacity to act for the state), not only must the provision of health care be decoupled from jobs; to develop a healthy society housing, food, water, and other conditions of health must be decoupled from the profit-making sphere, too.

One needn’t have expertise in the history of swill milk or business practices such as planned obsolescence to recognize that there is a fundamental conflict of interest between profit-making and providing care, and a system designed to extract profits from the latter will always, as a matter of law, be forced to reduce care to this function. This is just one instance of a general dynamic of privatization and austerity (and imperialism); one we’ve witnessed over the past few decades as the public realm is subordinated to the private, and ultimately neglected or privatized into non-existence.

In order to resolve this conflict of interests and to comply with the maxim, the conditions of health, not to mention the general ecological sphere, must be removed from the economic sphere. Healthy housing, healthy food, clean air and water and soil, and other health-inducing conditions, must be pursued for the sake of health, as an end in themselves, as a right, not for profit.

Where water is unhealthy, as in Flint, or is threatened by oil pipelines as in Standing Rock and many other places; where the air is carcinogenic, as it is throughout the world, the supreme law is being violated, according to this interpretation of the ancient maxim. Where police and other institutions destroy public health, they must be defunded, and replaced with concrete conditions of health — with ease, as opposed to disease.

None of this should be construed as merely a moral argument. As mentioned before, on a practical level it is a legal one, too. The health of the people, the public health, should be the supreme law.

Fidelity to the ideals of democracy, not to mention basic notions of justice, neighborhood and human decency, demands that the considerable resources at this society’s disposal be put to creating an entirely new social life, characterized not by the rampant conditions of disease destroying us all, but by conditions of health, beyond capitalism and the nation-state — not for profit, but for its own sake.

https://climateandcapitalism.com/2021/0 ... preme-law/

Well & good, let's have a revolution. Because nothing else will do.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Wed Feb 03, 2021 2:16 pm

CP of Greece, Vaccines and medications are subject to the profits and competition of groups and capitalist states
2/2/21 1:47 PM

Statement of the General Secretary of the CC of the KKE


In a statement on the developments regarding the vaccination process, the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the KKE, Dimitris Koutsoumbas, stressed the following:


“A few days ago, the vaccination process began, in a climate of complacency and excessive optimism cultivated by the government.


The KKE had stated from the beginning that this process would be long and should not provide an alibi so that the necessary shielding of the public health system and the protection measures in critical workplaces, in schools, means of transport, etc. would not proceed. Vaccines, although necessary to protect the health of the people from the pandemic, cannot replace the huge deficiencies in the public health system and preventive measures, especially in conditions of awaiting the 3rd wave of the pandemic. More areas of the country have already turned “red” (i.e. are high-risk areas), under the sole responsibility of the government, which has not taken any measures to ensure the protection of people's health.



We have also stated that Greece should not depend on the EU agreements with some pharmaceutical companies, which serve other purposes, and that there should be access to all available vaccines that are considered safe and effective, in order to have adequate vaccines and to timely achieve mass vaccination of the population. We demanded the public disclosure of the contracts signed by the EU with these companies.



The course of developments tragically confirms the assessments and positions of the KKE. The long delays in deliveries, the trade wars and the geopolitical competition, the privileged treatment of strong states at the expense of weaker ones, prove this.



It is confirmed that all these stem from the fact that vaccines and medicines are lucrative commodities, whose research, production, and distribution are subject to the profits and competitions of the big groups and the capitalist states.



And while this situation threatens the health and lives of the people, the government is promoting “vaccination certificates”, which in essence serve the interests of tourism and transport companies, while they can be used to make reductions in the necessary means of protection. There is the risk that the result from the uncontrolled opening of tourism last summer, without any preventive means such as tests, will be repeated”.



Referring to the proposal of the president of SYRIZA, he stated: “However, this cannot be tackled with wishes for the “acquisition of the patent”, which open a new vicious circle of bargains and agreements with pharmaceutical companies. The patent, which is directly linked to capitalist ownership, must be abolished. We highlight the need for a state socialized pharmaceutical industry and international cooperation to promote research, study, production of vaccines and medications.



This reality brings to the fore once again the blatant contradiction of our time: On the one hand the enormous leaps and achievements of science, technology, collective human labor, and on the other hand the appropriation of these achievements in order to increase the profits of business groups at the expense of popular needs, even of health and life. This is capitalism, the visible enemy that stands in the way of social progress and prosperity.”

2/2/2021

http://solidnet.org/article/CP-of-Greec ... st-states/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10727
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Socialist Demands for the COVID-19 Crisis

Post by blindpig » Tue Feb 09, 2021 2:26 pm

Image
The neoliberal model is once again under global scrutiny (Photo: Ojo Público)

WHO SPEAKS OF "CATASTROPHIC MORAL FAILURE"

VACCINE HOARDING STRIPS THE GLOBAL INEQUALITY OF NEOLIBERALISM
Augusto Marquez

8 Feb 2021 , 4:40 pm .

It seems that one must insist on how harmful the model that has been imposed in recent decades as the only possible civilizing proposal, in the image and likeness of the former country that is the United States and its cousins ​​scattered in the European Union, is for humanity.

The portal The Globe And Mail recently published that Canada is the only G7 country that receives vaccines from the COVAX fund, a mechanism coordinated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that helps buy cheaper doses of covid vaccines from called "developing countries".

Justin Treadeau's government had already purchased more doses per capita than any other country by November last year (guaranteeing the supply of 358 million doses for a population of 38 million, which equates to nine doses for each resident), and yet he asked the COVAX mechanism for 1.9 million more doses. Why and for what?

The hoarding of vaccines by the richest countries on the planet is destabilizing the management of the pandemic in other nations. You can ask yourself a lot of questions, and the G7 probably won't give an answer as often happens with criminals who lie a priori , even if they have been caught red-handed.


Venezuela is not the only entity that has denounced this suspicious hoarding of vaccines, which does not allow the free flow of those goods that should not be (if we take into account that health is a fundamental human right and not a business, as in those countries of the G7) and give rise to the fact that the degrees of the current pandemic will not really disappear or decrease for the time being.

For example, Doctors Without Borders and the organization Salud por Derecho support the proposal of India and South Africa before the World Trade Organization (WTO) to apply an exemption, through the Council for Intellectual Property Agreements, on certain property measures intellectual property in medicines, vaccines, diagnostic tests and other technologies against covid during the duration of the pandemic.

These institutions emphasize that "in a context of evident tension between the manufacture of vaccines and the demand for these, and the absolute lack of transparency in the purchase contracts of vaccines, suspending patents would give entry to more manufacturers and allow increased production "and ask countries to" support, or at least not hinder, the temporary exemption from the WTO. "

The global inequality generated by neoliberalism is once again shown openly, and all this financed by the same states that claim to protect their populations: it is estimated that more than 10 billion dollars have been invested with public funds in research and development, trials clinical and manufacturing of the six potential vaccine candidates developed by AstraZeneca / University of Oxford; Johnson & Johnson / BiologicalE; Pfizer / BioNTech; GlaxoSmithKline / Sanofi Pasteur; Novavax / Serum Institute of India; and Moderna / Lonza.

In other words, the largest pharmaceutical companies have benefited from state funds for their corporate benefit, and yet the governments of the so-called First World countries monopolize everything they produce.

Image
Direct agreements made by rich countries with pharmaceutical companies are concentrating the doses of covid vaccines (Photo: Duke Global Health Innovation Center)

It is so irrational to human understanding that it shows how unnatural the whole non-liberal health business is. To make matters worse, even Johns Hopkins University itself accepts that the monopolistic debauchery of this system borders on the absurd, publishing that a fifth (1/5) of the population will not have access to the covid vaccine at least until 2022.

Another report from the Duke University Institute for Global Health found that, as of mid-January, a group of high-income countries where 16% of the world's population lives had reserved 60% of the world's vaccine supply. Between neoliberal states and pharmaceutical corporations they pay and give the change.

More data: The People's Vaccine Alliance states that 96% of Pfizer / BioNTech's vaccine doses, such as Moderna's, have been purchased by rich countries, meaning that in 67 of the poorest countries only 1 out of every 10 people will receive a vaccine by 2021.

The release of patents on vaccines would provide an opportunity to remedy such numbers of biological and health terrorism being ignored, if not hampered, by the member countries of the European Union, Australia, the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom and Switzerland.

That is why vaccines made by Russian and Chinese institutions, including the gleaming Sputnik V and SinoVac, have been well received by Third World countries without access to pharmaceutical companies who prefer to play uncompromising monopoly laissez-faire than preservation of world human health.

Seen this way, it is absurd to speak of a geopolitical battle between hegemonic and emerging blocs for the vaccine, when there is no real struggle for political spaces in different areas of the world, but we should put the discussion in the eye of the hurricane: health as a commodity or health as a human right. But not the human rights understood and extended by the US State Department, but rather as the management of the general good of the human for the human.

That cannot be considered within the framework of the neoliberal model, because it would be a contradiction for itself, taking into account that the center of this is profit and capitalist accumulation.

To all this must be added the difficulty of vaccination for countries at war (conventional and unconventional). Specifically, Venezuela has reiterated the difficulties it presents in carrying out the necessary steps to immunize the Venezuelan population, as a result of the blockade imposed by successive United States governments. It would be a pointless joke to ask Biden to relax unilateral coercive measures considering that he himself is a synthesis of the business model we criticize here.

Fortunately, and thanks to Venezuela's strategic alliances with some emerging countries, the government of Nicolás Maduro reached agreements to immunize Venezuelans and residents of this country blocked with Russia, bringing the best possible product: Sputnik V. What will happen? with China? It remains to be seen, but we do not doubt that the attitude of solidarity will resemble the very great bar that Cuba has historically set for decades.

It is no coincidence that the countries targeted by the United States and its extraterritorial stewards are the most supportive of poor countries. A very contrary political attitude to that already expressed by the G7 et al .

What is going to cause all this is that the pandemic lasts longer , with the coronavirus being a transmittable passenger as easily as the flu. Is that the goal of the First World? Turning Earth's wretched into coronazombies in exchange for greater stability for capitalism amid its much-vaunted Great Reboot? Even speaking of prices, Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus said that "the price of this failure [in the global distribution of vaccines] will be paid with lives and means of subsistence in the poorest countries of the world."

If the leaders of the West want to talk about the success of their model of inequality, they must refer more explicitly to the model of death. In that they are quite efficient.

https://misionverdad.com/opinion/acapar ... iberalismo

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply