Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
CovertAction Bulletin: Project 2025 and the Far Right’s Agenda
By Rachel Hu and Chris Garaffa - July 10, 2024 2
https://linktr.ee/CovertActionBulletin
CLICK HERE to listen on podcast platforms worldwide
Support this broadcast: become a patreon!
Project 2025 bills itself as a comprehensive plan to undo decades of social progress—in its own words, to “dismantle the administrative state” and “return self-governance to the American people.” Democrats have jumped into using it and its connections to the Trump agenda and former staff as a reason to rally behind Joe Biden.
Among its 922-page Mandate for Leadership, Project 2025 suggests eliminating the Department of Education, increasing the U.S. nuclear weapon arsenal, harshly limiting access to reproductive care, rolling back LGBTQ rights and much more.
We’re joined by political strategist and movement journalist Anoa Changa to understand who’s behind Project 2025 and where it comes from.
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/0 ... ts-agenda/
*****
Project 2025 Continues the Historic Racist, Fascist Project
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 10 Jul 2024
Donald Trump and Taraji P. Henson, who brought Project 2025 to public attention. Image - The Mirror US
Project 2025 is just the latest in a series of conservative think pieces which outlines how republicans should wield presidential power. The outrage surrounding it ignores democrats’ collusion with republican policies when they are in office and is a cynical effort to scare especially Black voters into continuing support for the Biden/Harris ticket.
The right wing counter-revolution has been going on for more than 50 years. The Powell Memo was a 1971 directive from soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, instructing the US Chamber of Commerce how to defeat the “attack on the American free enterprise system". In other words, how to defeat any leftist or even leftish policies. The Contract with America outlined Newt Gingrich’s plan for republican control of congress. These are just two examples of conservative narratives that periodically receive public attention. They are declarations of how the right wing have been working to counter the gains of the New Deal and the Black liberation movement that resulted in benefits to everyone in the U.S.
The latest iteration of this dynamic is Project 2025 , a project of the Heritage Foundation which states clearly its intention to, “...take back the country from the grip of the radical Left.” Project 2025 is a blueprint for presidential policy should Donald Trump be elected again.
We should be so lucky to be in the grip of the radical left. Even milquetoast social democrats have been consigned to the sidelines of U.S. electoral politics. Joe Biden is president because the Democratic Party bosses feared the possibility of liberal reformer Bernie Sanders winning the nomination in 2020.
Project 2025 is replete with right wing red meat, from banning abortion to ending the Department of Education and also funding for public television. These have been staples of right wing think tank rhetoric since the very same Heritage Foundation played a large role in the Ronald Reagan administration. Project 2025 is an effort to expand cutting government spending, including for programs like Head Start, which millions of people use, and expanding presidential powers over federal agencies and replacing civil servants with political appointees.
This columnist urges caution in allowing Project 2036 to become a Democratic Party tool used to silence critics and to advocate for unquestioning support for Joe Biden’s re-election. There is always a right wing bogeyman trotted out when democrats are in trouble and need to silence their own people, especially Black people.
The frenzy over Project 2025 is such an example. We are suddenly supposed to cease criticism of Joe Biden, stop believing our own eyes when we observe his physical frailties and diminished capacity all in order to keep Donald Trump and Project 2025 at bay.
It has also been conveniently forgotten how often democrats have assisted in bringing right wing policies to fruition. It was Bill Clinton whose Crime Bill, assisted by then Senator Joe Biden, sent thousands of Black people to jail. It was Clinton whose Telecommunications Act ended Federal Communications Commissions regulations and resulted in media consolidation so complete that only six corporations control most of what we watch and hear.
Clinton’s welfare “reform” came straight from the Heritage Foundation and other right wing think tank playbooks. The right to seek public assistance from the federal government which had existed for 60 years ended. States were free to do as they pleased, with some making assistance nearly impossible to secure. Clinton’s plan required states to digitize their food stamp programs which were handed over to private corporations such as xerox. The conservative bogeymen could not have done any better as their dreams came true in a democratic administration.
The concept of Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, was one that Richard Nixon proposed and in 1989 the very same Heritage Foundation called for mandates to purchase insurance, a foundation of the Obamacare plan. Republican Mitt Romney put what became Obamacare in place as governor of Massachusetts. Nixon, Romney, and the Heritage Foundation all eschewed any concept of a publicly run health care system and insisted on enshrining health care as being run by corporations.
Now that Biden is suffering from anemic approval ratings and a bad debate performance the campaign pulled out their secret weapon, scaring Black people into voting for them. What better way to do so than to mix popular culture with their campaign.
The BET Music Awards was the venue for their latest gambit. The event included a cringe worthy faux interview between host Taraji P. Henson and Kamala Harris. Between the bad, fake R&B playing in the background and Harris saying, “I’m out here in these streets,” the painful performance and Henson’s pronouncements about Project 2025 struck a chord. "The Project 2025 plan is not a game. Look it up! I’m talking to all the mad people that don’t want to vote. You’re going to be mad about a lot of things if you don’t vote."
Henson’s words were magic to millions of Black voters. The inclination to feel trapped by the duopoly was suddenly in full effect and anyone expressing the slightest doubt about supporting Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is now targeted with vote shaming harangues.
The reality is that Project 2025 has been going on since 1776 with only infrequent successes in subduing the white power structure. The marketing may change and in 2024 conservatives over played their public relations hand and gave democrats a cudgel to use against them. So much so that Donald Trump tried to distance himself . “I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.” Of course, some of Project 2025’s authors were staffers in Trump’s administration. His clumsy attempt at denial proves how much traction the democrats gained from amplifying it.
Now millions of people who were stunned by Biden’s debate performance are back on board pledging to keep the barbarians from the gates. Not to be outdone with scaring Black people, Biden made the obligatory appearance at a Black church, Mt. Airy Church of God in Christ, in Philadelphia.
Conservatism and white power are the foundations of this country. There are moments when that dynamic is openly supported and praised and sometimes a place called Hope and Hope and Change are the means of masquerading what conservative think tanks say very openly.
https://blackagendareport.com/project-2 ... st-project
By Rachel Hu and Chris Garaffa - July 10, 2024 2
https://linktr.ee/CovertActionBulletin
CLICK HERE to listen on podcast platforms worldwide
Support this broadcast: become a patreon!
Project 2025 bills itself as a comprehensive plan to undo decades of social progress—in its own words, to “dismantle the administrative state” and “return self-governance to the American people.” Democrats have jumped into using it and its connections to the Trump agenda and former staff as a reason to rally behind Joe Biden.
Among its 922-page Mandate for Leadership, Project 2025 suggests eliminating the Department of Education, increasing the U.S. nuclear weapon arsenal, harshly limiting access to reproductive care, rolling back LGBTQ rights and much more.
We’re joined by political strategist and movement journalist Anoa Changa to understand who’s behind Project 2025 and where it comes from.
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/0 ... ts-agenda/
*****
Project 2025 Continues the Historic Racist, Fascist Project
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 10 Jul 2024
Donald Trump and Taraji P. Henson, who brought Project 2025 to public attention. Image - The Mirror US
Project 2025 is just the latest in a series of conservative think pieces which outlines how republicans should wield presidential power. The outrage surrounding it ignores democrats’ collusion with republican policies when they are in office and is a cynical effort to scare especially Black voters into continuing support for the Biden/Harris ticket.
The right wing counter-revolution has been going on for more than 50 years. The Powell Memo was a 1971 directive from soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, instructing the US Chamber of Commerce how to defeat the “attack on the American free enterprise system". In other words, how to defeat any leftist or even leftish policies. The Contract with America outlined Newt Gingrich’s plan for republican control of congress. These are just two examples of conservative narratives that periodically receive public attention. They are declarations of how the right wing have been working to counter the gains of the New Deal and the Black liberation movement that resulted in benefits to everyone in the U.S.
The latest iteration of this dynamic is Project 2025 , a project of the Heritage Foundation which states clearly its intention to, “...take back the country from the grip of the radical Left.” Project 2025 is a blueprint for presidential policy should Donald Trump be elected again.
We should be so lucky to be in the grip of the radical left. Even milquetoast social democrats have been consigned to the sidelines of U.S. electoral politics. Joe Biden is president because the Democratic Party bosses feared the possibility of liberal reformer Bernie Sanders winning the nomination in 2020.
Project 2025 is replete with right wing red meat, from banning abortion to ending the Department of Education and also funding for public television. These have been staples of right wing think tank rhetoric since the very same Heritage Foundation played a large role in the Ronald Reagan administration. Project 2025 is an effort to expand cutting government spending, including for programs like Head Start, which millions of people use, and expanding presidential powers over federal agencies and replacing civil servants with political appointees.
This columnist urges caution in allowing Project 2036 to become a Democratic Party tool used to silence critics and to advocate for unquestioning support for Joe Biden’s re-election. There is always a right wing bogeyman trotted out when democrats are in trouble and need to silence their own people, especially Black people.
The frenzy over Project 2025 is such an example. We are suddenly supposed to cease criticism of Joe Biden, stop believing our own eyes when we observe his physical frailties and diminished capacity all in order to keep Donald Trump and Project 2025 at bay.
It has also been conveniently forgotten how often democrats have assisted in bringing right wing policies to fruition. It was Bill Clinton whose Crime Bill, assisted by then Senator Joe Biden, sent thousands of Black people to jail. It was Clinton whose Telecommunications Act ended Federal Communications Commissions regulations and resulted in media consolidation so complete that only six corporations control most of what we watch and hear.
Clinton’s welfare “reform” came straight from the Heritage Foundation and other right wing think tank playbooks. The right to seek public assistance from the federal government which had existed for 60 years ended. States were free to do as they pleased, with some making assistance nearly impossible to secure. Clinton’s plan required states to digitize their food stamp programs which were handed over to private corporations such as xerox. The conservative bogeymen could not have done any better as their dreams came true in a democratic administration.
The concept of Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, was one that Richard Nixon proposed and in 1989 the very same Heritage Foundation called for mandates to purchase insurance, a foundation of the Obamacare plan. Republican Mitt Romney put what became Obamacare in place as governor of Massachusetts. Nixon, Romney, and the Heritage Foundation all eschewed any concept of a publicly run health care system and insisted on enshrining health care as being run by corporations.
Now that Biden is suffering from anemic approval ratings and a bad debate performance the campaign pulled out their secret weapon, scaring Black people into voting for them. What better way to do so than to mix popular culture with their campaign.
The BET Music Awards was the venue for their latest gambit. The event included a cringe worthy faux interview between host Taraji P. Henson and Kamala Harris. Between the bad, fake R&B playing in the background and Harris saying, “I’m out here in these streets,” the painful performance and Henson’s pronouncements about Project 2025 struck a chord. "The Project 2025 plan is not a game. Look it up! I’m talking to all the mad people that don’t want to vote. You’re going to be mad about a lot of things if you don’t vote."
Henson’s words were magic to millions of Black voters. The inclination to feel trapped by the duopoly was suddenly in full effect and anyone expressing the slightest doubt about supporting Joe Biden and Kamala Harris is now targeted with vote shaming harangues.
The reality is that Project 2025 has been going on since 1776 with only infrequent successes in subduing the white power structure. The marketing may change and in 2024 conservatives over played their public relations hand and gave democrats a cudgel to use against them. So much so that Donald Trump tried to distance himself . “I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.” Of course, some of Project 2025’s authors were staffers in Trump’s administration. His clumsy attempt at denial proves how much traction the democrats gained from amplifying it.
Now millions of people who were stunned by Biden’s debate performance are back on board pledging to keep the barbarians from the gates. Not to be outdone with scaring Black people, Biden made the obligatory appearance at a Black church, Mt. Airy Church of God in Christ, in Philadelphia.
Conservatism and white power are the foundations of this country. There are moments when that dynamic is openly supported and praised and sometimes a place called Hope and Hope and Change are the means of masquerading what conservative think tanks say very openly.
https://blackagendareport.com/project-2 ... st-project
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
So, Just watched about half a dozen replays of the supposed assassination attempt on Donald Trump. It looked like cheap theatrics to me, Reality TV. Professional wrestling. Which you know Trump is no stranger to:
https://www.wwe.com/superstars/donald-trump
https://www.google.com/search?q=trumppr ... u9ogs,st:0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkghtyxZ6rc
It's possible I'll be proven wrong, but you're gonna have to show me.
Cheap theater to make the real thing undoable? Or just something to rally jazz his fans? I dunno, but I do know it looked fake as hell to me.
Unsurprisingly the perps were shot dead. Funny how that always seems to happen. Ah well, dead men (and women) tell no tales. Can you say 'patsy? I knew you could...
Just as the United States is the 'New and Improved' Roman Republic(forget all those half assed wanna-bes)so the dissolution of this iteration descends into madness and treachery.
https://www.wwe.com/superstars/donald-trump
https://www.google.com/search?q=trumppr ... u9ogs,st:0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkghtyxZ6rc
It's possible I'll be proven wrong, but you're gonna have to show me.
Cheap theater to make the real thing undoable? Or just something to rally jazz his fans? I dunno, but I do know it looked fake as hell to me.
Unsurprisingly the perps were shot dead. Funny how that always seems to happen. Ah well, dead men (and women) tell no tales. Can you say 'patsy? I knew you could...
Just as the United States is the 'New and Improved' Roman Republic(forget all those half assed wanna-bes)so the dissolution of this iteration descends into madness and treachery.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
So, I guess no one saw it the way I did.(Damn, wasted all that money on laser ...) But I still think it looked fake. Didn't see no blood on Trump until he raised his hand to his ear. Did he deploy one of those fake-blood packets like they use in the 'squared circle'?. Naw he wouldn't do that...blindpig wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 11:47 pmSo, Just watched about half a dozen replays of the supposed assassination attempt on Donald Trump. It looked like cheap theatrics to me, Reality TV. Professional wrestling. Which you know Trump is no stranger to:
https://www.wwe.com/superstars/donald-trump
https://www.google.com/search?q=trumppr ... u9ogs,st:0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkghtyxZ6rc
It's possible I'll be proven wrong, but you're gonna have to show me.
Cheap theater to make the real thing undoable? Or just something to rally jazz his fans? I dunno, but I do know it looked fake as hell to me.
Unsurprisingly the perps were shot dead. Funny how that always seems to happen. Ah well, dead men (and women) tell no tales. Can you say 'patsy? I knew you could...
Just as the United States is the 'New and Improved' Roman Republic(forget all those half assed wanna-bes)so the dissolution of this iteration descends into madness and treachery.
And you notice that stories about '2025' have been knocked clear off the page just as it was gaining major traction. Just sayin'...
Everybody is blaming the Dems and of course they're got a rock solid motive. Even if not directly involved they're saying the 'fascist Trump' propaganda motivated the guy. Could be, though the 'lone wolf' is nearly mythical. You would figure that if this were a splat job the professionals from the spook agencies would have been more efficient. Just as in the assassination of Dr King you has a patsy, James Earl Ray, and a US Army sniper who did the deal.
If this was a 'splat-job' then it was poorly executed, just as if Jan6 was an insurrection then it was a sorry effort. Is this a reflection of the general competence to the empire's players? Could be all of a piece.
So then, I'm clueless. Two things for sure: this massively helps Trump's re-election effort and it makes it much more difficult to get him out of the game by dirty deeds. He's damn near bulletproof now.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
Attack on Trump to reshape election race
World leaders express shock at shooting as citizens fear rising political violence
By HENG WEILI in New York | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2024-07-15 07:07
Republican candidate Donald Trump is taken off the stage by security agents at an event in Pennsylvania on Saturday. REBECCA DROKE/AFP
Former US president Donald Trump was injured in a shooting during a campaign rally on Saturday, an attack that will likely reshape this year's US presidential race while US citizens fear rising political violence.
President Joe Biden, a Democrat who is running against Republican candidate Trump, was briefed about the incident and he spoke to Trump several hours after the shooting, the White House said.
"There's no place in America for this type of violence," the president said in public remarks. "It's sick. It's sick."
World leaders expressed shock over the wounding of Trump.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she was "deeply shocked" by the attack.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, who survived an assassination attempt in May, condemned the shooting in a Facebook post.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa wrote on X that the shooting of Trump "is a stark reminder of the dangers of political extremism and intolerance".
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said: "We must stand firm against any form of violence."
The attack heightened long-standing worries that political violence could erupt during the presidential campaign and after the election.
The concerns in part reflect the electorate's polarization, with the country appearing bitterly divided into two camps with divergent political and social visions.
"This horrific act of political violence at a peaceful campaign rally has no place in this country and should be unanimously and forcefully condemned," Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said on social media.
US citizens fear rising political violence, recent Reuters/Ipsos polls show, with two out of three respondents to a May survey saying they worried violence could follow the election.
Some of Trump's Republican allies said they believed the attack was politically motivated.
"For weeks Democrat leaders have been fueling ludicrous hysteria that Donald Trump winning reelection would be the end of democracy in America," said US Representative Steve Scalise, the No 2 House Republican, who survived a politically motivated shooting in 2017.
"Clearly we've seen far-left lunatics act on violent rhetoric in the past. This incendiary rhetoric must stop."
The incident occurred two days before the start of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, where Trump will be nominated as the GOP presidential candidate.
Now an already intense US presidential election campaign appears to be greatly affected, with the focus likely to shift to security for candidates.
'Polarized' country
Ian Bremmer, president and founder of GZERO Media, noted that the incident is a "very grave "turn of events in a country that is very deeply polarized.
"This is the worst sort of event that can happen in that environment, and I deeply worry that it presages much more political violence and social instability to come," Bremmer, also president and founder of GZERO Media's parent company, Eurasia Group, said in a video comment.
The attack was the most serious attempt to assassinate a president or presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan was shot at in 1981.
It drew attention to concerns about political violence in a deeply polarized US less than four months before the presidential election.
The perils of campaigning took on a new urgency after the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in California in 1968, and again in 1972 when Arthur Bremer shot and seriously injured George Wallace.
That led to increased protection of candidates, even as the threats persisted, notably against Jesse Jackson in 1988 and Barack Obama in 2008.
https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202407/ ... 0df88.html
******
Trump Assassination Attempt: A Round-Up
Posted on July 14, 2024 by Lambert Strether
By Lambert Strether of Corrente.
The iconic image (from AP’s Evan Vucci), helpfully annotated to show how composition makes for an iconic image:
And speaking of iconic images, if your first thought is “Trump (nearly) died for us”:
(Notice, in Vucci’s image, a woman also supporting Trump in his agony.)
Or if your first thought is “Trump (nearly) died for our country” (AP’s Joe Rosenthal):
(The stars and stripes doing its work, although I suppose Secret Service agents in sunglasses will have to stand in for the Marines. But that’s where we are, isn’t it?)
Icons propagate. Already, T-shirts printed with Vucci’s image are on sale at a New Jersey boardwalk:
“Shooting makes me stronger.”[1]
Having begun, as it were, in medias res, let’s circle back to the beginning, and proceed in an orderly manner. I will aggregate the material I have read on the shooter, the venue, the shooting, and cui bono. I’ll conclude with some of the more humane reactions. Starting with the shooter–
The Shooter
We know very little about the shooter, although one of the first things we know about is his partisan affiliation (or proxies therefor). From the New York Post, “Thomas Matthew Crooks ID’d as gunman who shot Trump during Pa. rally”
According to state voter status records, Crooks was a registered Republican.
The shooter made one singular $15 donation to the liberal ActBlue political action committee on January 20, 2021 — Biden’s Inauguration Day, the Intercept reportedp[2].
(Smith was not carrying ID; he was identified through the gun and DNA analysis[3].)However, from the Inquirer:
[ex-Bethel Park student Max Ryan] Smith recalled participating in a mock debate with Crooks in an American history course in which the teacher had students stand on opposite sides of the classroom to signal their support or opposition.
“The majority of the class were on the liberal side, but Tom, no matter what, always stood his ground on the conservative side,” Smith said. “That’s still the picture I have of him. Just standing alone on one side while the rest of the class was on the other … It makes me wonder why he would carry out an assassination attempt on the conservative candidate.”
Crooks graduated from high school two years ago. From the Post:
Crooks was a member of the 2022 graduating class at Bethel Park High School, the school district confirmed Sunday morning.
Video shows him walking across a stage to accept his diploma. He also received a $500 National Math and Science Initative Star Award during his graduating year, TribLive reported.
His high school experience was unhappy. NBC:
A high school classmate, Jason Kohler, 21, said Crooks was a “loner” who was “bullied so much in high school.”
Crooks would regularly wear hunting outfits and was made fun of for the way he dressed. He often sat alone at lunch, Kohler added.
His post-high school experience seems not to have been happy, or at leat not STEM-oriented. BBC:
Crooks worked in a local nursing home kitchen just a short drive away from his home, the BBC understands.
Then there’s the family. CNN:
When reached by CNN late Saturday night, Crooks’ father, Matthew Crooks, said he was trying to figure out “what the hell is going on” but would “wait until I talk to law enforcement” before speaking about his son. He could not be reached again on Sunday.
We have no motive. BBC:
Having established Crooks’s identity, police and agencies are investigating his motive.
“We do not currently have an identified motive,” said Kevin Rojek, FBI Pittsburgh special agent in charge, at a briefing on Saturday night.
It would be disconcerting if a diary documenting Crooks’s motives were found; a lone gunman, acting alone, but leaving behind a diary is a movie we’ve all seen before. And the sequels, too.
The Venue
From the New York Post:
Crooks, of Bethel Park, Pa., squeezed off at least five to seven shots — one of which grazed Trump in the ear — at an outdoor rally in Butler, just outside Pittsburgh, according to law enforcement sources.
Sources said Crooks crawled on the roof of a manufacturing plant more than 130 yards away from the stage at Butler Farm Show grounds.
Here is a map from the New York Times that shows the rally site and the manufacturing plant:
Security at the manufacturing plant (likely to be American Glass Research) was lax[4]:
I am talking to an individual who works in the building where the shooter was posted. Building does not have inside cameras. They think access likely gained via area circled in photo.
They do not recall Secret Service or law enforcement sweeping building prior to event https://t.co/erOQVBuSay pic.twitter.com/iiykEfPwTt
— Robert Evans (The Only Robert Evans) (@IwriteOK) July 14, 2024
And:
They have seen photos of the deceased shooter and do not recognize them.
They noted before the event that security seemed weirdly lax, and their building seemed to be almost ignored prior.
"If we live in a security theater…this was a security 8th grade recital." pic.twitter.com/5MUIokkQ02
— Robert Evans (The Only Robert Evans) (@IwriteOK) July 14, 2024
I recall reading, but cannot find again, that the cops talked to people at the plant, but only to tell them they’d be using the parking lot. Here is a report of “a guy” sighted moving between the buildings of the manufacturing plant:
JUST IN: Eyewitness says he saw the suspect at Trump's rally go "in between one building to the next" when he alerted the police.
"I noticed two officers that were looking for something or somebody."
"I was looking around myself and seeing a guy on top of one of the buildings… pic.twitter.com/PbXx8QSnnV
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 14, 2024
The question arises how Crooks picked this building, how he knew to get access, etc.
The Shooting
Here is an extraordinary interview from the BBC with an eyewitness to the shooting:
FULL INTERVIEW with a witness, talking to @BBCNews, who says he saw a man with a gun on a building roof firing shots.
Donald Trump was rushed off stage during a rally in Pennsylvania after gun shots were heard.
He talked to @BBCBlindGazza – more information @BBCNews pic.twitter.com/aWqSXbzor2
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) July 14, 2024
The prose version, “Witness says he saw gunman on roof near Trump rally“:
Mr Smith was listening from outside the rally and said he saw the gunman around five minutes into Trump’s speech.
“We noticed the guy bear-crawling up the roof of the building beside us, 50ft away,” he said. “He had a rifle, we could clearly see a rifle.
“We’re pointing at him, the police are down there running around on the ground, we’re like ‘Hey man, there’s a guy on the roof with a rifle’… and the police did not know what was going on.”
Mr Smith said he tried to alert the authorities for three to four minutes, but thought they probably could not see the gunman because of the slope of the roof.
“Why is there not Secret Service on all of these roofs here?” he asked. “This is not a big place. “[It’s a] security failure, 100% security failure.”
He said he later saw the agents shoot the gunman: “They crawled up on the roof, they had their guns pointed at him, made sure he was dead. He was dead, and that was it – it was over.”
Here is what someone very near the stage itself experienced. From the Free Press:
I was four feet from the stage, in a causeway with about five other journalists. My daughter, a photographer, was next to me. Her husband was next to her.
Trump was back on his feet within seconds, although his red hat was knocked off his head. He was calm.
I heard him shout to one of his staffers, “Get my shoes!”
He lifted his arm in the air. I think he shouted, “Fight!”
Then he definitely shouted, “USA!” The crowd chanted it back in unison.
Here is a photo of the bullet whizzing toward Trump’s head[5]:
A remarkable photo captured by my former White House Press Corps colleague Doug Mills.
Zoom in right above President Trump’s shoulder and you’ll see a bullet flying in the air to the right of President Trump’s head following an attempted assassination. pic.twitter.com/FqmLBCytoW
— Haraz N. Ghanbari (@HarazGhanbari) July 14, 2024
And here is a video of Trump shouting “Fight! Fight!”:
Trump yelling “Fight. Fight,” after getting grazed by a bullet in the ear, an inch from ending his life.
No panic. No crawling on his knees to safety. The man stands up, faces the crowd, and yells “Fight.”
Historic footage. Just incredible.
pic.twitter.com/9ERhGJaia0
— Lomez (@L0m3z) July 13, 2024
Taleb comments:
The NYT is in bad faith: any other leader (or NYT journalist) would have cowered on the floor.
Trump exhibited exceptional physical courage; recognize the fact even if you disagree with the politics. pic.twitter.com/6smqbxGg23
— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) July 14, 2024
Note that there were more victims: “A former fire chief attending the rally with family was killed, as was the gunman. Two other people were also critically wounded.”
Cui Bono
Now let us ask who benefits. Curiously enough, both Trump and Biden may. I say “may” rather than “do” because of this salutary reminder from Stoller:
I don’t know why anyone assumes a big polling bump for Trump. Trump got convicted and it barely mattered. Biden showed cognitive decline and it barely mattered. No one knows anything right now.
— Matt Stoller (@matthewstoller) July 14, 2024
But let’s not be nihilists. First, Trump:
The first and simplest reaction comes from the New York Post (and I confess that it was mine, as well):
The moment probably also won him the election.
The same reaction from The Hill:
“President Trump survives this attack — he just won the election,” Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) told POLITICO in a brief interview shortly after the shooting.
Prediction markets agree:
There are far more important things than markets, as the Trump assassination attempt makes very, very clear. But it’s my job to look at this, and this is what’s just happened to the odds of a Trump victory in the betting markets, according to Real Clear Politics: pic.twitter.com/sYxqrM1Ia5
— John Authers (@johnauthers) July 14, 2024
But then I remembered [checks campaign timer] that 114 days is a long time in politics.
Axios draws attention to the effect on apartisan voters:
The biggest electoral impact from Saturday’s stunning events could come courtesy of low-information and politically disengaged Americans, who are expected to make up a decisive voting bloc.
The attempted assassination was so shocking that it immediately cut through a wide range of cultural and digital bubbles, drawing mostly sympathetic reactions from influencers, athletes and CEOs.
Elon Musk, for example, immediately endorsed Trump in a post that racked up more than 80 million views on X.
YouTuber Jake Paul, who has legions of young followers, tweeted: “If it isn’t apparent enough who God wants to win. When you try and kill God’s angels and saviors of the world it just makes them bigger.”
Axios, however, equates “electoral impact” with popular sentiment; however, the salient point is the effect on low information voters in the swing states where the election will be won or lost. However, Pennsylvania is a key swing state (which is why I keep drawing a red box around it on the RealClearPolitics poll averages chart), and while I hesitate to say that Crooks just sewed up Pennsylvania for Trump, he certainly did Trump no harm. I would speculate that turnout in the non-Philly, non-Pittsburgh counties will be, well, fervent.
The Telegraph argues that the assassination attempt reinforces Trump’s messaging:
Trump has built his campaign on the idea that everyone is out to get him. Federal prosecutors, judges, election officials, rival politicians and journalists have all been accused of trying to bring down his campaign and prevent his return to the White House.
Many of those claims have rightly been contested. But after the incident in Pennsylvania, even Trump’s worst enemies cannot deny that there are some who would rather see him dead than re-elected.
Trump supporters urge that the attempt reinforces Trump’s ethos:
And people say, why do people like Trump so much? Why are his supporters, why are they so loyal to Trump? You know why? Because of what we saw today. Because he got up after getting hit by a bullet or something, and he said, I’m here basically fighting for you, and fight on. And we don’t have enough people like that in this country in politics.
But Biden may also benefit. First, his staff can wrap him up in tissue paper again. Axios:
For President Biden, it was an easy decision to reach out to former President Trump, pull down his political ads and return to the White House.Biden advisers were unanimous that he needs to take his fight directly to Trump.
That’s a difficult case to make against a man who came within several millimeters of losing his life.
There’s now a broad recognition that Biden is facing a delicate balancing act in the coming weeks: He must continue to warn that Trump is a threat to democracy, while acknowledging the recent threat to Trump’s life.
Second, out of deference and respect to Trump in this difficult time, the Biden campaign can save some money:
The Democratic National Committee told Fox News that it is in the process of pulling down ads that it went up with on Monday on 57 municipal buses in Milwaukee.
Third and most importantly, I speculate that the Republican National Convention plus Trump’s cannily postponed selection of a vice-present, would already have sucked all the oxygen out of the room. The Trump assassination attempt will “blot out the sun” (I somehow did not preserve the link to the Democratic strategist who used that phrase). The campaign to unelect Biden has depended critically on constant, incestuous dogpiling in the press. That coverage will be much, much harder to get, and so indeed Biden may run out the clock. (Alert reader antidlc helpfully points out that the DNC may set a date for its virtual roll call before the end of the month.)
Conclusion
I really wanted to have a section about how the blame cannons are being deployed, but time presses, and so I must leave them on the cutting room floor. To conclude, I’ve aggregated some of reactions to Trump’s assassination that are more kind or humane, rather than less; tending to reject the Schmittian view that the essential dichotomy of politics is the friend/enemy distinction:
First, Russell Brand:
Trump Assassination Attempt Failed.
What now? pic.twitter.com/V2thuSJJM8
— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) July 13, 2024
Second, Robert F. Kennedy, Junior:
A truly presidential and beautifully poetic, compassionate, and inspiring commentary by @RobertKennedyJr on @NewsNation about the attempted assassination of President Trump. pic.twitter.com/frDGF5IUVH
— Jaya Phillips (@iamJayaLove) July 14, 2024
Third, Melania Trump:
pic.twitter.com/IGIWzL6SMJ
— MELANIA TRUMP (@MELANIATRUMP) July 14, 2024
(I actually found Melania Trump’s letter touching. Odd, but touching. Note that all these reactions, in their different ways, appeal to the “better angels of our nature” instead of vacuous notions of civility.)
Lincoln, in his First Inaugural, got it wrong:
We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
In fact, slaveholders and abolitionists were enemies. But can anyone truly say that the country faces such a “polarizing” issue today? (Perhaps it should — climate, for example; or, well, capitalism — but does it?) Perhaps this time we can get it right, or more right than wrong. Of course, this would take an extraordinary turnaround from “defiance” to generosity of spirit but what are we “fighting” for?
NOTES
[1] On Trump’s fist pump and whether the Secret Service should have permitted it, The American Conservative:
An assassin can kill a president, but cowardice is what kills a movement. President Donald Trump didn’t give his would-be murderer what the gunman wanted. Trump survived the shots, then he did something profound—he waved back the Secret Service agents shielding him, freeing his bloodied face up from the scrum, and, with a look of defiance, raised his fist and said, “Fight!”
He shouldn’t have done it, according to the rules of presidential security. And the Secret Service were obviously torn between the urgency of covering the former president and getting him to safety, and allowing him to do what he was determined to do. They parted just far enough for Trump to show his face and pump his fist. His life and theirs were at risk.
But the risk had to be taken. The United States can’t be led by a coward or by someone who looks like one under fire. Trump knew in a split second what a leader had to do in that situation. He had to show courage. Morale is a nation’s blood. Trump refused to let the assassin shed it, even as his own wounds bled.
Despite the garish prose, I think Trump was right to do what he did. We can’t have the stagehands directing the stars, after all. NOTE Re Kayfabe: Could Trump possibly have converted himself from a Heel to a Face?!
[2] The PAC was the Progressive Turnout Project:
The Pennsylvania voter file lists him as a 20-year old registered Republican, while FEC contribution records show a single $15 ActBlue contribution earmarked to Progressive Turnout Project (same street address for both), so there's something for everyone to freak out over. https://t.co/fJwoVLm3X4 pic.twitter.com/YtuCM29xmC
— Rob Pyers (@rpyers) July 14, 2024
Progressive Turnout Project’s email consultant was the cartoonishly evil Mothership Strategies. Mothership Strategies was not on my Bingo card!
[3] Crooks is said not to have had a criminal record, so where did the DNA come from?
[4] I’m not entirely happy with this account; the writer has done work for Bellingcat.
[5] There is a theory running round that the blood on Trump’s face comes from the shattered glass of a TelePrompter, but so what?
APPENDIX: The Cassandras
Here are some of the people who called it.
(August 30, 2023) Tucker Carlson, “Tucker Carlson stokes conspiracies, claims U.S. is ‘speeding towards’ assassination of Trump“, NBC: “If you begin with criticism, then you go to protest, then you go to impeachment, now you go to indictment and none of them work. What’s next? Graph it out, man. We’re speeding towards assassination, obviously. … They have decided — permanent Washington, both parties have decided — that there’s something about Trump that’s so threatening to them, they just can’t have him.”
(August 31, 2023) Yves Smith, “The Other Option for Containing Trump“: “It’s not as if this is the first time Tucker has brought up the possibility that Trump could be assassinated by members of the power structure.”
Steve Bannon (June 2024), the Guardian: “In a Guardian interview in June, Steve Bannon – a Trump adviser and former White House chief strategist – spoke of his concerns that the Republican nominee would be assassinated before the election in November. ‘It’s my number one fear,’ Bannon said, speaking before he began a four-month prison sentence for defying a congressional subpoena. ‘Assassination has to be at the top of the list and I believe that the woman that’s running the Secret Service part is not doing her job.'” (I can’t find the original when I search on these quotes, and I tried several search engines. Readers?)
* * *
Sadly, this tweet supposedly from wint is a fake:
yes its real. please follow me for more real shit https://t.co/JXotTam4c5
— wint (@dril) July 14, 2024
But:
APPENDIX: The Lighter Side
Via:
This situation reminds me of this [Your Favorite Ethnicity Here (YFEH)] joke:
Two YFEHs are hiding on the side of the road waiting to try and kill Hitler. They wait and wait but after many hours Hitler still hasn’t come down the road where they expect him. After a long time of waiting, one man turns to the other man and says “Geez! Where is this guy?” And the other man turns to him and replies “I don’t know… I hope nothing happened to him.”
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07 ... nd-up.html
******
The US Came Close To Having TWO Presidential Candidates With No Brain
The western political-media class hasn’t been this sympathetic and supportive toward Trump since he bombed Damascus.
Caitlin Johnstone
July 14, 2024
❖
Donald Trump is now on the receiving end of a deluge of sympathy and support throughout the western world after surviving an assassination attempt, despite the fact that he himself is an open and unapologetic perpetrator of assassination.
Seems like everyone’s got a theory about what happened and why right now. As of this writing I’m content to just sit back and not know until more information comes in.
❖
That was a close one. America came an inch from having two presidential candidates with no brain.
❖
Now the same US officials who are responsible for overseeing the single most murderous power structure on the face of this planet are standing united in saying “There is no place for violence in America!”
❖
The western political-media class hasn’t been this sympathetic and supportive toward Trump since he bombed Damascus.
❖
I can’t wait til Trump is president so Democrats can remember that genocide is an inexcusable evil.
❖
Facebook has auto-blocked a Substack article of mine, which has never happened to me in the years I’ve been posting my Substacks there. The post was critical of Israel, while three subsequent articles I’ve successfully shared on Facebook thereafter made no mention of Israel. The reason given by Facebook’s censorship AI is listed as “It looks like you tried to get likes, follows, shares or video views in a misleading way.”
I find this information worth sharing because it comes immediately after Facebook’s parent company Meta announced that it will begin censoring criticism of Zionism as hate speech whenever it can be construed as such. People are already reporting a marked uptick in censorship on the platform when making posts critical of Israel.
❖
The imperial narrative managers of the mass media have successfully paced the ongoing Gaza genocide from a front page story at the center of attention to something bad we just hear the occasional story about, like global warming or poverty. It’s still happening as ferociously as ever, but if you’re getting your information about the world from mainstream sources you are now only peripherally aware of this while your attention is directed to far less consequential things.
The picture the mass media paint of the world is night and day different from life as it actually is. It’s as different from reality as any other work of fiction, not so much because it directly denies reality or makes up whole cloth lies about it, but because it so drastically misrepresents what’s going on through the manipulation of public attention.
❖
Democrats have been babbling about what a decent and honest person Biden is while defending the decision for him to stay in the presidential race. This is ridiculous. Biden is not and has never been a decent person; he’s easily one of the worst human beings on this planet. And what’s funny is that his dementia has probably made him a softer, gentler person than he used to be. The world might be even uglier than it is now if he had his old brain.
❖
There’s a quote by Noam Chomsky which you absolutely must understand if you want to be able to make sense of political discourse in the west:
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum — even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.”
Regardless of your feelings about Chomsky, nothing about our information ecosystem will make sense to you without understanding and appreciating this quote. Until you get this and hold it at the forefront of your awareness, you won’t understand western politics, punditry or political debates.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/07 ... -no-brain/
Great 'one-liners'
World leaders express shock at shooting as citizens fear rising political violence
By HENG WEILI in New York | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2024-07-15 07:07
Republican candidate Donald Trump is taken off the stage by security agents at an event in Pennsylvania on Saturday. REBECCA DROKE/AFP
Former US president Donald Trump was injured in a shooting during a campaign rally on Saturday, an attack that will likely reshape this year's US presidential race while US citizens fear rising political violence.
President Joe Biden, a Democrat who is running against Republican candidate Trump, was briefed about the incident and he spoke to Trump several hours after the shooting, the White House said.
"There's no place in America for this type of violence," the president said in public remarks. "It's sick. It's sick."
World leaders expressed shock over the wounding of Trump.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she was "deeply shocked" by the attack.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, who survived an assassination attempt in May, condemned the shooting in a Facebook post.
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa wrote on X that the shooting of Trump "is a stark reminder of the dangers of political extremism and intolerance".
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said: "We must stand firm against any form of violence."
The attack heightened long-standing worries that political violence could erupt during the presidential campaign and after the election.
The concerns in part reflect the electorate's polarization, with the country appearing bitterly divided into two camps with divergent political and social visions.
"This horrific act of political violence at a peaceful campaign rally has no place in this country and should be unanimously and forcefully condemned," Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said on social media.
US citizens fear rising political violence, recent Reuters/Ipsos polls show, with two out of three respondents to a May survey saying they worried violence could follow the election.
Some of Trump's Republican allies said they believed the attack was politically motivated.
"For weeks Democrat leaders have been fueling ludicrous hysteria that Donald Trump winning reelection would be the end of democracy in America," said US Representative Steve Scalise, the No 2 House Republican, who survived a politically motivated shooting in 2017.
"Clearly we've seen far-left lunatics act on violent rhetoric in the past. This incendiary rhetoric must stop."
The incident occurred two days before the start of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, where Trump will be nominated as the GOP presidential candidate.
Now an already intense US presidential election campaign appears to be greatly affected, with the focus likely to shift to security for candidates.
'Polarized' country
Ian Bremmer, president and founder of GZERO Media, noted that the incident is a "very grave "turn of events in a country that is very deeply polarized.
"This is the worst sort of event that can happen in that environment, and I deeply worry that it presages much more political violence and social instability to come," Bremmer, also president and founder of GZERO Media's parent company, Eurasia Group, said in a video comment.
The attack was the most serious attempt to assassinate a president or presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan was shot at in 1981.
It drew attention to concerns about political violence in a deeply polarized US less than four months before the presidential election.
The perils of campaigning took on a new urgency after the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in California in 1968, and again in 1972 when Arthur Bremer shot and seriously injured George Wallace.
That led to increased protection of candidates, even as the threats persisted, notably against Jesse Jackson in 1988 and Barack Obama in 2008.
https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202407/ ... 0df88.html
******
Trump Assassination Attempt: A Round-Up
Posted on July 14, 2024 by Lambert Strether
By Lambert Strether of Corrente.
The iconic image (from AP’s Evan Vucci), helpfully annotated to show how composition makes for an iconic image:
And speaking of iconic images, if your first thought is “Trump (nearly) died for us”:
(Notice, in Vucci’s image, a woman also supporting Trump in his agony.)
Or if your first thought is “Trump (nearly) died for our country” (AP’s Joe Rosenthal):
(The stars and stripes doing its work, although I suppose Secret Service agents in sunglasses will have to stand in for the Marines. But that’s where we are, isn’t it?)
Icons propagate. Already, T-shirts printed with Vucci’s image are on sale at a New Jersey boardwalk:
“Shooting makes me stronger.”[1]
Having begun, as it were, in medias res, let’s circle back to the beginning, and proceed in an orderly manner. I will aggregate the material I have read on the shooter, the venue, the shooting, and cui bono. I’ll conclude with some of the more humane reactions. Starting with the shooter–
The Shooter
We know very little about the shooter, although one of the first things we know about is his partisan affiliation (or proxies therefor). From the New York Post, “Thomas Matthew Crooks ID’d as gunman who shot Trump during Pa. rally”
According to state voter status records, Crooks was a registered Republican.
The shooter made one singular $15 donation to the liberal ActBlue political action committee on January 20, 2021 — Biden’s Inauguration Day, the Intercept reportedp[2].
(Smith was not carrying ID; he was identified through the gun and DNA analysis[3].)However, from the Inquirer:
[ex-Bethel Park student Max Ryan] Smith recalled participating in a mock debate with Crooks in an American history course in which the teacher had students stand on opposite sides of the classroom to signal their support or opposition.
“The majority of the class were on the liberal side, but Tom, no matter what, always stood his ground on the conservative side,” Smith said. “That’s still the picture I have of him. Just standing alone on one side while the rest of the class was on the other … It makes me wonder why he would carry out an assassination attempt on the conservative candidate.”
Crooks graduated from high school two years ago. From the Post:
Crooks was a member of the 2022 graduating class at Bethel Park High School, the school district confirmed Sunday morning.
Video shows him walking across a stage to accept his diploma. He also received a $500 National Math and Science Initative Star Award during his graduating year, TribLive reported.
His high school experience was unhappy. NBC:
A high school classmate, Jason Kohler, 21, said Crooks was a “loner” who was “bullied so much in high school.”
Crooks would regularly wear hunting outfits and was made fun of for the way he dressed. He often sat alone at lunch, Kohler added.
His post-high school experience seems not to have been happy, or at leat not STEM-oriented. BBC:
Crooks worked in a local nursing home kitchen just a short drive away from his home, the BBC understands.
Then there’s the family. CNN:
When reached by CNN late Saturday night, Crooks’ father, Matthew Crooks, said he was trying to figure out “what the hell is going on” but would “wait until I talk to law enforcement” before speaking about his son. He could not be reached again on Sunday.
We have no motive. BBC:
Having established Crooks’s identity, police and agencies are investigating his motive.
“We do not currently have an identified motive,” said Kevin Rojek, FBI Pittsburgh special agent in charge, at a briefing on Saturday night.
It would be disconcerting if a diary documenting Crooks’s motives were found; a lone gunman, acting alone, but leaving behind a diary is a movie we’ve all seen before. And the sequels, too.
The Venue
From the New York Post:
Crooks, of Bethel Park, Pa., squeezed off at least five to seven shots — one of which grazed Trump in the ear — at an outdoor rally in Butler, just outside Pittsburgh, according to law enforcement sources.
Sources said Crooks crawled on the roof of a manufacturing plant more than 130 yards away from the stage at Butler Farm Show grounds.
Here is a map from the New York Times that shows the rally site and the manufacturing plant:
Security at the manufacturing plant (likely to be American Glass Research) was lax[4]:
I am talking to an individual who works in the building where the shooter was posted. Building does not have inside cameras. They think access likely gained via area circled in photo.
They do not recall Secret Service or law enforcement sweeping building prior to event https://t.co/erOQVBuSay pic.twitter.com/iiykEfPwTt
— Robert Evans (The Only Robert Evans) (@IwriteOK) July 14, 2024
And:
They have seen photos of the deceased shooter and do not recognize them.
They noted before the event that security seemed weirdly lax, and their building seemed to be almost ignored prior.
"If we live in a security theater…this was a security 8th grade recital." pic.twitter.com/5MUIokkQ02
— Robert Evans (The Only Robert Evans) (@IwriteOK) July 14, 2024
I recall reading, but cannot find again, that the cops talked to people at the plant, but only to tell them they’d be using the parking lot. Here is a report of “a guy” sighted moving between the buildings of the manufacturing plant:
JUST IN: Eyewitness says he saw the suspect at Trump's rally go "in between one building to the next" when he alerted the police.
"I noticed two officers that were looking for something or somebody."
"I was looking around myself and seeing a guy on top of one of the buildings… pic.twitter.com/PbXx8QSnnV
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 14, 2024
The question arises how Crooks picked this building, how he knew to get access, etc.
The Shooting
Here is an extraordinary interview from the BBC with an eyewitness to the shooting:
FULL INTERVIEW with a witness, talking to @BBCNews, who says he saw a man with a gun on a building roof firing shots.
Donald Trump was rushed off stage during a rally in Pennsylvania after gun shots were heard.
He talked to @BBCBlindGazza – more information @BBCNews pic.twitter.com/aWqSXbzor2
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) July 14, 2024
The prose version, “Witness says he saw gunman on roof near Trump rally“:
Mr Smith was listening from outside the rally and said he saw the gunman around five minutes into Trump’s speech.
“We noticed the guy bear-crawling up the roof of the building beside us, 50ft away,” he said. “He had a rifle, we could clearly see a rifle.
“We’re pointing at him, the police are down there running around on the ground, we’re like ‘Hey man, there’s a guy on the roof with a rifle’… and the police did not know what was going on.”
Mr Smith said he tried to alert the authorities for three to four minutes, but thought they probably could not see the gunman because of the slope of the roof.
“Why is there not Secret Service on all of these roofs here?” he asked. “This is not a big place. “[It’s a] security failure, 100% security failure.”
He said he later saw the agents shoot the gunman: “They crawled up on the roof, they had their guns pointed at him, made sure he was dead. He was dead, and that was it – it was over.”
Here is what someone very near the stage itself experienced. From the Free Press:
I was four feet from the stage, in a causeway with about five other journalists. My daughter, a photographer, was next to me. Her husband was next to her.
Trump was back on his feet within seconds, although his red hat was knocked off his head. He was calm.
I heard him shout to one of his staffers, “Get my shoes!”
He lifted his arm in the air. I think he shouted, “Fight!”
Then he definitely shouted, “USA!” The crowd chanted it back in unison.
Here is a photo of the bullet whizzing toward Trump’s head[5]:
A remarkable photo captured by my former White House Press Corps colleague Doug Mills.
Zoom in right above President Trump’s shoulder and you’ll see a bullet flying in the air to the right of President Trump’s head following an attempted assassination. pic.twitter.com/FqmLBCytoW
— Haraz N. Ghanbari (@HarazGhanbari) July 14, 2024
And here is a video of Trump shouting “Fight! Fight!”:
Trump yelling “Fight. Fight,” after getting grazed by a bullet in the ear, an inch from ending his life.
No panic. No crawling on his knees to safety. The man stands up, faces the crowd, and yells “Fight.”
Historic footage. Just incredible.
pic.twitter.com/9ERhGJaia0
— Lomez (@L0m3z) July 13, 2024
Taleb comments:
The NYT is in bad faith: any other leader (or NYT journalist) would have cowered on the floor.
Trump exhibited exceptional physical courage; recognize the fact even if you disagree with the politics. pic.twitter.com/6smqbxGg23
— Nassim Nicholas Taleb (@nntaleb) July 14, 2024
Note that there were more victims: “A former fire chief attending the rally with family was killed, as was the gunman. Two other people were also critically wounded.”
Cui Bono
Now let us ask who benefits. Curiously enough, both Trump and Biden may. I say “may” rather than “do” because of this salutary reminder from Stoller:
I don’t know why anyone assumes a big polling bump for Trump. Trump got convicted and it barely mattered. Biden showed cognitive decline and it barely mattered. No one knows anything right now.
— Matt Stoller (@matthewstoller) July 14, 2024
But let’s not be nihilists. First, Trump:
The first and simplest reaction comes from the New York Post (and I confess that it was mine, as well):
The moment probably also won him the election.
The same reaction from The Hill:
“President Trump survives this attack — he just won the election,” Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) told POLITICO in a brief interview shortly after the shooting.
Prediction markets agree:
There are far more important things than markets, as the Trump assassination attempt makes very, very clear. But it’s my job to look at this, and this is what’s just happened to the odds of a Trump victory in the betting markets, according to Real Clear Politics: pic.twitter.com/sYxqrM1Ia5
— John Authers (@johnauthers) July 14, 2024
But then I remembered [checks campaign timer] that 114 days is a long time in politics.
Axios draws attention to the effect on apartisan voters:
The biggest electoral impact from Saturday’s stunning events could come courtesy of low-information and politically disengaged Americans, who are expected to make up a decisive voting bloc.
The attempted assassination was so shocking that it immediately cut through a wide range of cultural and digital bubbles, drawing mostly sympathetic reactions from influencers, athletes and CEOs.
Elon Musk, for example, immediately endorsed Trump in a post that racked up more than 80 million views on X.
YouTuber Jake Paul, who has legions of young followers, tweeted: “If it isn’t apparent enough who God wants to win. When you try and kill God’s angels and saviors of the world it just makes them bigger.”
Axios, however, equates “electoral impact” with popular sentiment; however, the salient point is the effect on low information voters in the swing states where the election will be won or lost. However, Pennsylvania is a key swing state (which is why I keep drawing a red box around it on the RealClearPolitics poll averages chart), and while I hesitate to say that Crooks just sewed up Pennsylvania for Trump, he certainly did Trump no harm. I would speculate that turnout in the non-Philly, non-Pittsburgh counties will be, well, fervent.
The Telegraph argues that the assassination attempt reinforces Trump’s messaging:
Trump has built his campaign on the idea that everyone is out to get him. Federal prosecutors, judges, election officials, rival politicians and journalists have all been accused of trying to bring down his campaign and prevent his return to the White House.
Many of those claims have rightly been contested. But after the incident in Pennsylvania, even Trump’s worst enemies cannot deny that there are some who would rather see him dead than re-elected.
Trump supporters urge that the attempt reinforces Trump’s ethos:
And people say, why do people like Trump so much? Why are his supporters, why are they so loyal to Trump? You know why? Because of what we saw today. Because he got up after getting hit by a bullet or something, and he said, I’m here basically fighting for you, and fight on. And we don’t have enough people like that in this country in politics.
But Biden may also benefit. First, his staff can wrap him up in tissue paper again. Axios:
For President Biden, it was an easy decision to reach out to former President Trump, pull down his political ads and return to the White House.Biden advisers were unanimous that he needs to take his fight directly to Trump.
That’s a difficult case to make against a man who came within several millimeters of losing his life.
There’s now a broad recognition that Biden is facing a delicate balancing act in the coming weeks: He must continue to warn that Trump is a threat to democracy, while acknowledging the recent threat to Trump’s life.
Second, out of deference and respect to Trump in this difficult time, the Biden campaign can save some money:
The Democratic National Committee told Fox News that it is in the process of pulling down ads that it went up with on Monday on 57 municipal buses in Milwaukee.
Third and most importantly, I speculate that the Republican National Convention plus Trump’s cannily postponed selection of a vice-present, would already have sucked all the oxygen out of the room. The Trump assassination attempt will “blot out the sun” (I somehow did not preserve the link to the Democratic strategist who used that phrase). The campaign to unelect Biden has depended critically on constant, incestuous dogpiling in the press. That coverage will be much, much harder to get, and so indeed Biden may run out the clock. (Alert reader antidlc helpfully points out that the DNC may set a date for its virtual roll call before the end of the month.)
Conclusion
I really wanted to have a section about how the blame cannons are being deployed, but time presses, and so I must leave them on the cutting room floor. To conclude, I’ve aggregated some of reactions to Trump’s assassination that are more kind or humane, rather than less; tending to reject the Schmittian view that the essential dichotomy of politics is the friend/enemy distinction:
First, Russell Brand:
Trump Assassination Attempt Failed.
What now? pic.twitter.com/V2thuSJJM8
— Russell Brand (@rustyrockets) July 13, 2024
Second, Robert F. Kennedy, Junior:
A truly presidential and beautifully poetic, compassionate, and inspiring commentary by @RobertKennedyJr on @NewsNation about the attempted assassination of President Trump. pic.twitter.com/frDGF5IUVH
— Jaya Phillips (@iamJayaLove) July 14, 2024
Third, Melania Trump:
pic.twitter.com/IGIWzL6SMJ
— MELANIA TRUMP (@MELANIATRUMP) July 14, 2024
(I actually found Melania Trump’s letter touching. Odd, but touching. Note that all these reactions, in their different ways, appeal to the “better angels of our nature” instead of vacuous notions of civility.)
Lincoln, in his First Inaugural, got it wrong:
We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
In fact, slaveholders and abolitionists were enemies. But can anyone truly say that the country faces such a “polarizing” issue today? (Perhaps it should — climate, for example; or, well, capitalism — but does it?) Perhaps this time we can get it right, or more right than wrong. Of course, this would take an extraordinary turnaround from “defiance” to generosity of spirit but what are we “fighting” for?
NOTES
[1] On Trump’s fist pump and whether the Secret Service should have permitted it, The American Conservative:
An assassin can kill a president, but cowardice is what kills a movement. President Donald Trump didn’t give his would-be murderer what the gunman wanted. Trump survived the shots, then he did something profound—he waved back the Secret Service agents shielding him, freeing his bloodied face up from the scrum, and, with a look of defiance, raised his fist and said, “Fight!”
He shouldn’t have done it, according to the rules of presidential security. And the Secret Service were obviously torn between the urgency of covering the former president and getting him to safety, and allowing him to do what he was determined to do. They parted just far enough for Trump to show his face and pump his fist. His life and theirs were at risk.
But the risk had to be taken. The United States can’t be led by a coward or by someone who looks like one under fire. Trump knew in a split second what a leader had to do in that situation. He had to show courage. Morale is a nation’s blood. Trump refused to let the assassin shed it, even as his own wounds bled.
Despite the garish prose, I think Trump was right to do what he did. We can’t have the stagehands directing the stars, after all. NOTE Re Kayfabe: Could Trump possibly have converted himself from a Heel to a Face?!
[2] The PAC was the Progressive Turnout Project:
The Pennsylvania voter file lists him as a 20-year old registered Republican, while FEC contribution records show a single $15 ActBlue contribution earmarked to Progressive Turnout Project (same street address for both), so there's something for everyone to freak out over. https://t.co/fJwoVLm3X4 pic.twitter.com/YtuCM29xmC
— Rob Pyers (@rpyers) July 14, 2024
Progressive Turnout Project’s email consultant was the cartoonishly evil Mothership Strategies. Mothership Strategies was not on my Bingo card!
[3] Crooks is said not to have had a criminal record, so where did the DNA come from?
[4] I’m not entirely happy with this account; the writer has done work for Bellingcat.
[5] There is a theory running round that the blood on Trump’s face comes from the shattered glass of a TelePrompter, but so what?
APPENDIX: The Cassandras
Here are some of the people who called it.
(August 30, 2023) Tucker Carlson, “Tucker Carlson stokes conspiracies, claims U.S. is ‘speeding towards’ assassination of Trump“, NBC: “If you begin with criticism, then you go to protest, then you go to impeachment, now you go to indictment and none of them work. What’s next? Graph it out, man. We’re speeding towards assassination, obviously. … They have decided — permanent Washington, both parties have decided — that there’s something about Trump that’s so threatening to them, they just can’t have him.”
(August 31, 2023) Yves Smith, “The Other Option for Containing Trump“: “It’s not as if this is the first time Tucker has brought up the possibility that Trump could be assassinated by members of the power structure.”
Steve Bannon (June 2024), the Guardian: “In a Guardian interview in June, Steve Bannon – a Trump adviser and former White House chief strategist – spoke of his concerns that the Republican nominee would be assassinated before the election in November. ‘It’s my number one fear,’ Bannon said, speaking before he began a four-month prison sentence for defying a congressional subpoena. ‘Assassination has to be at the top of the list and I believe that the woman that’s running the Secret Service part is not doing her job.'” (I can’t find the original when I search on these quotes, and I tried several search engines. Readers?)
* * *
Sadly, this tweet supposedly from wint is a fake:
yes its real. please follow me for more real shit https://t.co/JXotTam4c5
— wint (@dril) July 14, 2024
But:
APPENDIX: The Lighter Side
Via:
This situation reminds me of this [Your Favorite Ethnicity Here (YFEH)] joke:
Two YFEHs are hiding on the side of the road waiting to try and kill Hitler. They wait and wait but after many hours Hitler still hasn’t come down the road where they expect him. After a long time of waiting, one man turns to the other man and says “Geez! Where is this guy?” And the other man turns to him and replies “I don’t know… I hope nothing happened to him.”
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07 ... nd-up.html
******
The US Came Close To Having TWO Presidential Candidates With No Brain
The western political-media class hasn’t been this sympathetic and supportive toward Trump since he bombed Damascus.
Caitlin Johnstone
July 14, 2024
❖
Donald Trump is now on the receiving end of a deluge of sympathy and support throughout the western world after surviving an assassination attempt, despite the fact that he himself is an open and unapologetic perpetrator of assassination.
Seems like everyone’s got a theory about what happened and why right now. As of this writing I’m content to just sit back and not know until more information comes in.
❖
That was a close one. America came an inch from having two presidential candidates with no brain.
❖
Now the same US officials who are responsible for overseeing the single most murderous power structure on the face of this planet are standing united in saying “There is no place for violence in America!”
❖
The western political-media class hasn’t been this sympathetic and supportive toward Trump since he bombed Damascus.
❖
I can’t wait til Trump is president so Democrats can remember that genocide is an inexcusable evil.
❖
Facebook has auto-blocked a Substack article of mine, which has never happened to me in the years I’ve been posting my Substacks there. The post was critical of Israel, while three subsequent articles I’ve successfully shared on Facebook thereafter made no mention of Israel. The reason given by Facebook’s censorship AI is listed as “It looks like you tried to get likes, follows, shares or video views in a misleading way.”
I find this information worth sharing because it comes immediately after Facebook’s parent company Meta announced that it will begin censoring criticism of Zionism as hate speech whenever it can be construed as such. People are already reporting a marked uptick in censorship on the platform when making posts critical of Israel.
❖
The imperial narrative managers of the mass media have successfully paced the ongoing Gaza genocide from a front page story at the center of attention to something bad we just hear the occasional story about, like global warming or poverty. It’s still happening as ferociously as ever, but if you’re getting your information about the world from mainstream sources you are now only peripherally aware of this while your attention is directed to far less consequential things.
The picture the mass media paint of the world is night and day different from life as it actually is. It’s as different from reality as any other work of fiction, not so much because it directly denies reality or makes up whole cloth lies about it, but because it so drastically misrepresents what’s going on through the manipulation of public attention.
❖
Democrats have been babbling about what a decent and honest person Biden is while defending the decision for him to stay in the presidential race. This is ridiculous. Biden is not and has never been a decent person; he’s easily one of the worst human beings on this planet. And what’s funny is that his dementia has probably made him a softer, gentler person than he used to be. The world might be even uglier than it is now if he had his old brain.
❖
There’s a quote by Noam Chomsky which you absolutely must understand if you want to be able to make sense of political discourse in the west:
“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum — even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there’s free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.”
Regardless of your feelings about Chomsky, nothing about our information ecosystem will make sense to you without understanding and appreciating this quote. Until you get this and hold it at the forefront of your awareness, you won’t understand western politics, punditry or political debates.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/07 ... -no-brain/
Great 'one-liners'
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS IN THE ATTACK AGAINST DONALD TRUMP
15 Jul 2024 , 7:00 pm .
The bullet grazed Donald Trump's left ear (Photo: The New York Times)
The attack this weekend on Republican candidate and former US President Donald Trump has had particular repercussions both in the media and in politics.
Tensions are mounting as the November presidential election approaches with Biden under pressure to drop out of the re-election race and Trump now more determined than ever to continue on his path to the White House again.
THE FACT
Setting: a political-electoral rally in the small town of Butler, in the state of Pennsylvania, last Saturday, July 13.
A bullet hit Trump's right ear, causing a slight injury and a gush of blood that was captured by all cameras at the time. The number of shots fired had not been confirmed as of the time of writing. Three people who were taking part in the demonstration were injured; one of them died immediately .
The sniper died after being neutralized by the Secret Service on the spot, later identified as 20-year-old Thomas Crooks , allegedly an Antifa activist with mental health problems.
Following the attack, presidents and prime ministers condemned the incident and any use of political violence, including a message from President Nicolás Maduro.
REACTIONS AND DIRECTIONS
As soon as the event occurred, there was a clearly coordinated and total disdain for the term “assassination” or “attempted assassination” among politicians in the Democratic Party and their associated media, a key branch of the American establishment. The tone for this narrative was set by Barack Obama with a post on X, claiming that “we still don’t know exactly what happened,” despite the evidence:
There is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy. Although we don’t yet know exactly what happened, we should all be relieved that former President Trump wasn’t seriously hurt, and use this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics.… Show more
7:44 PM · Jul 13, 2024
Biden later that night refused to call what happened to Trump an "assassination attempt," although he did mention the word "shooting . "
USA Today, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC and AP, to name a few, have all deliberately covered up and minimized what happened at Butler, doing everything they can to present it as if it were not an attempted murder.
This is a psychological operation to remove from Trump any imagery of martyrdom that could give wings to the Republican candidacy, given the weakened figure of Biden after the presidential debate at the beginning of this month. A president was literally shot in the face, and the bullet that passed close to his head was captured on camera. What else is needed for it to be considered unequivocally an assassination attempt ?
The denial that there was an assassination attempt against Trump, the trivialization of the event and the cartelization of presenting it as “just another event” have been toned down in the last 48 hours, however, until now the issue has not been treated with the seriousness it requires.
The Butler shooting occurred two days before Republicans were set to meet in Milwaukee for their nominating convention, where Donald Trump's candidacy was set to be confirmed (as indeed happened on Monday, July 15). While Democrats have blamed the tycoon for encouraging political violence, this time it was the other way around: Republicans instantly blamed President Biden and his allies for the attack.
They argued that it came from incendiary language that labeled the former president a proto-fascist who would destroy (so-called) American democracy and someone who must be stopped at all costs: Trump’s now-vice presidential candidate, Senator JD Vance, said that “The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to the attempted assassination of President Trump.”
Political polarization since the rise of the Trump phenomenon has put American society at a crossroads, where a good part of the population supports the Republican candidate's bet, while another supports the Democratic establishment, in a much more complex ideological and pragmatic struggle that has put on the table of professional analysts and commentators (and artists from various disciplines) the plausible scenario of an upcoming American civil war.
The New York Times quotes Michael Kazin, a historian at Georgetown University, who said that political violence has a long history in the United States: "Like 1968, or 1919, or 1886, or 1861, the violence that just occurred is quite inevitable in a society as bitterly divided as ours," he said.
The reference to these dates is to assassinations and attempted assassinations of American presidents, a fairly consistent tradition in the country over two and a half centuries. Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield in the 19th century and William McKinley and John F. Kennedy in the 20th century were successful assassinations. Ronald Reagan and now Donald Trump were victims of assassination attempts, both from the Republican Party.
But it is, as Kazin suggests, the first time that a shocking event like Trump's assassination could give a serious boost to the civil war scenario, as could be seen in Alex Garland's film, Civil War , due to the tensions experienced in the political-ideological and other divisive factors in the United States that will be worth analyzing at another time.
Additional information: A report by the Canadian think-tank Policy Horizons Canada, close to Justin Trudeau's government, does not rule out the possibility of a civil war in the United States and has asked the current administration to prepare for it.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT POSSIBLE ANSWERS
There have been other recent assassination attempts around the world. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico was the victim of an assassination attempt just two months ago. The Hungarian intelligence service was also reported to have prevented an assassination attempt on Prime Minister Viktor Orban. And Ukrainian military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov announced that operations to eliminate Putin have indeed been carried out, but so far they have been unsuccessful.
This indicates a trend of carrying out attacks of this type, precisely against political figures contrary to the interests and agendas of the Democratic Party and its partners, including Trump.
While the “lone wolf” narrative has dominated in assigning responsibility for such events, it would be worthwhile to raise some questions and comments that may not have answers but that open up the range of perspectives surrounding the events that occurred in Butler.
How was it possible for the shooter to be so close to Trump’s platform to get an open shot without being detected by the Secret Service? Why did the Secret Service take so long to neutralize the sniper after the shots were fired? What is the reason for the lack of bulletproof shields by law enforcement? Were there other shooters at the scene, and if so ( as one forensic expert suggests ), why are there no reports of them in the mainstream media ? On politics, is Vance’s nomination as Trump’s running mate a response to the Butler shooting? And finally: Is there any connection between this assassination attempt and those reported against the top leaders of Slovakia, Hungary and Russia?
These are questions that shed light and shadow on the issue. Most likely, there will be no answers, but it is also possible that many other details surrounding the investigation will help to clear up the media fog surrounding the matter. We will see.
https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/lu ... nald-trump
Google Translator
******
The attack on Trump in the context of the American crisis
Lorenzo Maria Pacini
July 15, 2024
The U.S. is in the midst of an internal social crisis that is degenerating to the point of unthinkable.
If perhaps it was not clear enough until now, there is now no excuse for not understanding how things stand: the U.S. is in the midst of an internal social crisis that is degenerating to the point of unthinkable.
The operating regime of the Deep State with stars and stripes is ready to kill its opponents, even in its own homeland, as was the case in the days of JFK, as was also the case in recent weeks in Europe with the assassination attempt on Robert Fico and Viktor Orban’s security, as happened in the Middle East with Ebrahim Raisi and as, perhaps, will happen again. There is no other way: brutal violence is the last effective option for them.
Eliminating the opponent, after all, is a rule that Americans know very well and have applied indiscriminately for decades all over the world. Violence, racism, endless wars, massacres committed in the name of democracy, support for terrorism in Israel, profit ahead of everything, a staggering number of homeless people on the streets, guns being sold practically in supermarkets, men no longer lucid kept specifically in the White House so that someone else (unelected) would be in charge. Attacks, thankfully, failed, more successful attacks, coups halfway around the world, planned colored revolutions, lies upon lies told to justify invasion wars that the media system wants us to pass off as peace missions. This is what the United States of America is all about. Especially today.
The attack on Donald Trump right now, in the midst of a media crisis for Joe Biden made up of back-to-back gaffes that can no longer be hidden from American citizens, is of enormous impact and can be interpreted in multiple senses. What forms the backdrop to all this is the crisis in American domestic politics, now verging on civil war. Just imagine if Trump had been killed: what would have happened? In all likelihood, an armed civil war would have erupted in a matter of days in multiple places in the U.S. macro-area, confirming the various movie theories that foretell imminent war. The U.S. is a ticking time bomb that is continually being defused and then reactivated.
To stimulate reflection, notwithstanding the paucity of information available to date on the event, let us try to offer two possible explanations, which are meant to be provocative.
1) It was a real event with a real shooter who used real bullets, which will of course be evidenced by the findings of real victims and real bullet holes in the impact points around the president’s podium. The story is that a shooter climbed onto a rooftop and fired several rifle shots at President Trump, narrowly missing but grazing and wounding him in the ear. In the course of this attack, the shooter basically compacted the bloc of conservative Republican votes and moderate patriots in America to stand with Trump and to discredit and demonize all politicians, media, and other groups who dislike or vilify him. This will make Donald Trump a kind of superhero, a man of steel who is recovering from an apparent “head wound” (of biblical significance) with infectious courage, as people tearfully watch his aggressive fist in the air symbolizing defiance against Democratic tyranny, while the words “fight fight fight” roar from his lips to the audience. A truly dramatic image. It is strangely interesting that the Secret Service agents organized a very photogenic posture when Trump got up from the ground. Trump resembled the classic statue of the U.S. Marines in Washington DC raising the American flag at Iwo Jima in World War II. There was also an American flag directly above his head. Surprisingly dramatic. Then Trump was driven off the stage in a black SUV and taken away, and the rest is leaking out.
2) The other possibility we have to consider is that the shooting was not real but a false flag event made for political theater and was designed to have an emotional impact that would affect the nation and manipulate people, as well as distract from other issues in the world, such as the implosion of the U.S. economy, the Ukrainian debacle, the collapse of the Netanyahu government in Israel, and the general rise of the BRICS as an economic and political power. Then again, there have been numerous occasions in American history when shootings and attacks were later proven to be false and engineered for political purposes. There are many interesting details that go in favor of a media fabrication, but now is not the time to analyze them.
What is the result of this shooting? Watch Trump emerge with a bandage around his ear and a scowl and a renewed title of hero and a speech about how he “took a bullet for the American people,” etc. Also watch all his supporters quickly become fanatical and delusional with platitudes and slogans of Make America Great Again, stadium choruses and calls for revenge. Think of how soon this whole event could be used as justification for repressive policies of dissent, or how they could be mixed with support for Israel, or for a strengthening of NATO in war footing under the guise of terrorism.
Obviously, there will be a Republican political victory if the election takes place in November, or a convenient civil war triggered by the clash between Trump and the Democrats. Let’s keep an eye on the reactions of Zelensky, Netanyahu, EU governance; there could also be a planned effort and a convenient uncovering of evidence and links blaming the assassination on a foreign country, such as Russia, Iran, China, ISIS-K, etc. Nothing can be ruled out a priori.
We are in a highly kaleidoscopic environment where confusion and propaganda will confuse facts, evidence and truth. Let us hope that it is real and has not been dramatized or falsified, because if it were real, at least we would know who is the psychopath among us and the agenda, the political violence he intends to unleash before the elections. Because if the bombing and the shooting were fake, if it was all artifice and theater to achieve psychological manipulation of the American public, then there is no point in the election because there is no country, only a mass slave state run by a party of lunatics.
One thing is certain: the American crisis can no longer be ignored. It is now up to Americans to choose whether to seize the opportunity to take matters into their own hands and establish, at last, a Heartland in America’s heartland, or whether to remain at the mercy of their fate from Sealand, which will soon disappear in an all but inevitable global armed conflict.
One question is now being asked of every American: you, what kind of American are you?
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... an-crisis/
Shocking! The Press is out to get Trump! And water is wet...
Italics added, Curiouser and curiouser. I think those who finger the SS got it wrong, those guys like Trump, unlike the spooks. So then, incompetence on their part. Elsewise they were in on the scam.
And speaking of Zelensky, am I the first to suggest that the Nazi Ukes had a hand in this? They certainly got the motive, the track record and the backing of US & Brit spook agencies.
See? Bootless speculation is cheap and easy...
If the regime and/or the spooks were behind this don't you think Trump would be dead? Would they have the operation entirely depend upon a half-assed punk? Or would a professional do the deal and let a patsy take the fall?
And fuck all that 'Heartland' talk, the only people qualified to talk about that are the ones the people from Europe ethnically cleansed and nearly exterminated.
15 Jul 2024 , 7:00 pm .
The bullet grazed Donald Trump's left ear (Photo: The New York Times)
The attack this weekend on Republican candidate and former US President Donald Trump has had particular repercussions both in the media and in politics.
Tensions are mounting as the November presidential election approaches with Biden under pressure to drop out of the re-election race and Trump now more determined than ever to continue on his path to the White House again.
THE FACT
Setting: a political-electoral rally in the small town of Butler, in the state of Pennsylvania, last Saturday, July 13.
A bullet hit Trump's right ear, causing a slight injury and a gush of blood that was captured by all cameras at the time. The number of shots fired had not been confirmed as of the time of writing. Three people who were taking part in the demonstration were injured; one of them died immediately .
The sniper died after being neutralized by the Secret Service on the spot, later identified as 20-year-old Thomas Crooks , allegedly an Antifa activist with mental health problems.
Following the attack, presidents and prime ministers condemned the incident and any use of political violence, including a message from President Nicolás Maduro.
REACTIONS AND DIRECTIONS
As soon as the event occurred, there was a clearly coordinated and total disdain for the term “assassination” or “attempted assassination” among politicians in the Democratic Party and their associated media, a key branch of the American establishment. The tone for this narrative was set by Barack Obama with a post on X, claiming that “we still don’t know exactly what happened,” despite the evidence:
There is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy. Although we don’t yet know exactly what happened, we should all be relieved that former President Trump wasn’t seriously hurt, and use this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics.… Show more
7:44 PM · Jul 13, 2024
Biden later that night refused to call what happened to Trump an "assassination attempt," although he did mention the word "shooting . "
USA Today, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC and AP, to name a few, have all deliberately covered up and minimized what happened at Butler, doing everything they can to present it as if it were not an attempted murder.
This is a psychological operation to remove from Trump any imagery of martyrdom that could give wings to the Republican candidacy, given the weakened figure of Biden after the presidential debate at the beginning of this month. A president was literally shot in the face, and the bullet that passed close to his head was captured on camera. What else is needed for it to be considered unequivocally an assassination attempt ?
The denial that there was an assassination attempt against Trump, the trivialization of the event and the cartelization of presenting it as “just another event” have been toned down in the last 48 hours, however, until now the issue has not been treated with the seriousness it requires.
The Butler shooting occurred two days before Republicans were set to meet in Milwaukee for their nominating convention, where Donald Trump's candidacy was set to be confirmed (as indeed happened on Monday, July 15). While Democrats have blamed the tycoon for encouraging political violence, this time it was the other way around: Republicans instantly blamed President Biden and his allies for the attack.
They argued that it came from incendiary language that labeled the former president a proto-fascist who would destroy (so-called) American democracy and someone who must be stopped at all costs: Trump’s now-vice presidential candidate, Senator JD Vance, said that “The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to the attempted assassination of President Trump.”
Political polarization since the rise of the Trump phenomenon has put American society at a crossroads, where a good part of the population supports the Republican candidate's bet, while another supports the Democratic establishment, in a much more complex ideological and pragmatic struggle that has put on the table of professional analysts and commentators (and artists from various disciplines) the plausible scenario of an upcoming American civil war.
The New York Times quotes Michael Kazin, a historian at Georgetown University, who said that political violence has a long history in the United States: "Like 1968, or 1919, or 1886, or 1861, the violence that just occurred is quite inevitable in a society as bitterly divided as ours," he said.
The reference to these dates is to assassinations and attempted assassinations of American presidents, a fairly consistent tradition in the country over two and a half centuries. Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield in the 19th century and William McKinley and John F. Kennedy in the 20th century were successful assassinations. Ronald Reagan and now Donald Trump were victims of assassination attempts, both from the Republican Party.
But it is, as Kazin suggests, the first time that a shocking event like Trump's assassination could give a serious boost to the civil war scenario, as could be seen in Alex Garland's film, Civil War , due to the tensions experienced in the political-ideological and other divisive factors in the United States that will be worth analyzing at another time.
Additional information: A report by the Canadian think-tank Policy Horizons Canada, close to Justin Trudeau's government, does not rule out the possibility of a civil war in the United States and has asked the current administration to prepare for it.
QUESTIONS WITHOUT POSSIBLE ANSWERS
There have been other recent assassination attempts around the world. Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico was the victim of an assassination attempt just two months ago. The Hungarian intelligence service was also reported to have prevented an assassination attempt on Prime Minister Viktor Orban. And Ukrainian military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov announced that operations to eliminate Putin have indeed been carried out, but so far they have been unsuccessful.
This indicates a trend of carrying out attacks of this type, precisely against political figures contrary to the interests and agendas of the Democratic Party and its partners, including Trump.
While the “lone wolf” narrative has dominated in assigning responsibility for such events, it would be worthwhile to raise some questions and comments that may not have answers but that open up the range of perspectives surrounding the events that occurred in Butler.
How was it possible for the shooter to be so close to Trump’s platform to get an open shot without being detected by the Secret Service? Why did the Secret Service take so long to neutralize the sniper after the shots were fired? What is the reason for the lack of bulletproof shields by law enforcement? Were there other shooters at the scene, and if so ( as one forensic expert suggests ), why are there no reports of them in the mainstream media ? On politics, is Vance’s nomination as Trump’s running mate a response to the Butler shooting? And finally: Is there any connection between this assassination attempt and those reported against the top leaders of Slovakia, Hungary and Russia?
These are questions that shed light and shadow on the issue. Most likely, there will be no answers, but it is also possible that many other details surrounding the investigation will help to clear up the media fog surrounding the matter. We will see.
https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/lu ... nald-trump
Google Translator
******
The attack on Trump in the context of the American crisis
Lorenzo Maria Pacini
July 15, 2024
The U.S. is in the midst of an internal social crisis that is degenerating to the point of unthinkable.
If perhaps it was not clear enough until now, there is now no excuse for not understanding how things stand: the U.S. is in the midst of an internal social crisis that is degenerating to the point of unthinkable.
The operating regime of the Deep State with stars and stripes is ready to kill its opponents, even in its own homeland, as was the case in the days of JFK, as was also the case in recent weeks in Europe with the assassination attempt on Robert Fico and Viktor Orban’s security, as happened in the Middle East with Ebrahim Raisi and as, perhaps, will happen again. There is no other way: brutal violence is the last effective option for them.
Eliminating the opponent, after all, is a rule that Americans know very well and have applied indiscriminately for decades all over the world. Violence, racism, endless wars, massacres committed in the name of democracy, support for terrorism in Israel, profit ahead of everything, a staggering number of homeless people on the streets, guns being sold practically in supermarkets, men no longer lucid kept specifically in the White House so that someone else (unelected) would be in charge. Attacks, thankfully, failed, more successful attacks, coups halfway around the world, planned colored revolutions, lies upon lies told to justify invasion wars that the media system wants us to pass off as peace missions. This is what the United States of America is all about. Especially today.
The attack on Donald Trump right now, in the midst of a media crisis for Joe Biden made up of back-to-back gaffes that can no longer be hidden from American citizens, is of enormous impact and can be interpreted in multiple senses. What forms the backdrop to all this is the crisis in American domestic politics, now verging on civil war. Just imagine if Trump had been killed: what would have happened? In all likelihood, an armed civil war would have erupted in a matter of days in multiple places in the U.S. macro-area, confirming the various movie theories that foretell imminent war. The U.S. is a ticking time bomb that is continually being defused and then reactivated.
To stimulate reflection, notwithstanding the paucity of information available to date on the event, let us try to offer two possible explanations, which are meant to be provocative.
1) It was a real event with a real shooter who used real bullets, which will of course be evidenced by the findings of real victims and real bullet holes in the impact points around the president’s podium. The story is that a shooter climbed onto a rooftop and fired several rifle shots at President Trump, narrowly missing but grazing and wounding him in the ear. In the course of this attack, the shooter basically compacted the bloc of conservative Republican votes and moderate patriots in America to stand with Trump and to discredit and demonize all politicians, media, and other groups who dislike or vilify him. This will make Donald Trump a kind of superhero, a man of steel who is recovering from an apparent “head wound” (of biblical significance) with infectious courage, as people tearfully watch his aggressive fist in the air symbolizing defiance against Democratic tyranny, while the words “fight fight fight” roar from his lips to the audience. A truly dramatic image. It is strangely interesting that the Secret Service agents organized a very photogenic posture when Trump got up from the ground. Trump resembled the classic statue of the U.S. Marines in Washington DC raising the American flag at Iwo Jima in World War II. There was also an American flag directly above his head. Surprisingly dramatic. Then Trump was driven off the stage in a black SUV and taken away, and the rest is leaking out.
2) The other possibility we have to consider is that the shooting was not real but a false flag event made for political theater and was designed to have an emotional impact that would affect the nation and manipulate people, as well as distract from other issues in the world, such as the implosion of the U.S. economy, the Ukrainian debacle, the collapse of the Netanyahu government in Israel, and the general rise of the BRICS as an economic and political power. Then again, there have been numerous occasions in American history when shootings and attacks were later proven to be false and engineered for political purposes. There are many interesting details that go in favor of a media fabrication, but now is not the time to analyze them.
What is the result of this shooting? Watch Trump emerge with a bandage around his ear and a scowl and a renewed title of hero and a speech about how he “took a bullet for the American people,” etc. Also watch all his supporters quickly become fanatical and delusional with platitudes and slogans of Make America Great Again, stadium choruses and calls for revenge. Think of how soon this whole event could be used as justification for repressive policies of dissent, or how they could be mixed with support for Israel, or for a strengthening of NATO in war footing under the guise of terrorism.
Obviously, there will be a Republican political victory if the election takes place in November, or a convenient civil war triggered by the clash between Trump and the Democrats. Let’s keep an eye on the reactions of Zelensky, Netanyahu, EU governance; there could also be a planned effort and a convenient uncovering of evidence and links blaming the assassination on a foreign country, such as Russia, Iran, China, ISIS-K, etc. Nothing can be ruled out a priori.
We are in a highly kaleidoscopic environment where confusion and propaganda will confuse facts, evidence and truth. Let us hope that it is real and has not been dramatized or falsified, because if it were real, at least we would know who is the psychopath among us and the agenda, the political violence he intends to unleash before the elections. Because if the bombing and the shooting were fake, if it was all artifice and theater to achieve psychological manipulation of the American public, then there is no point in the election because there is no country, only a mass slave state run by a party of lunatics.
One thing is certain: the American crisis can no longer be ignored. It is now up to Americans to choose whether to seize the opportunity to take matters into their own hands and establish, at last, a Heartland in America’s heartland, or whether to remain at the mercy of their fate from Sealand, which will soon disappear in an all but inevitable global armed conflict.
One question is now being asked of every American: you, what kind of American are you?
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... an-crisis/
Shocking! The Press is out to get Trump! And water is wet...
Italics added, Curiouser and curiouser. I think those who finger the SS got it wrong, those guys like Trump, unlike the spooks. So then, incompetence on their part. Elsewise they were in on the scam.
And speaking of Zelensky, am I the first to suggest that the Nazi Ukes had a hand in this? They certainly got the motive, the track record and the backing of US & Brit spook agencies.
See? Bootless speculation is cheap and easy...
If the regime and/or the spooks were behind this don't you think Trump would be dead? Would they have the operation entirely depend upon a half-assed punk? Or would a professional do the deal and let a patsy take the fall?
And fuck all that 'Heartland' talk, the only people qualified to talk about that are the ones the people from Europe ethnically cleansed and nearly exterminated.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
No Tears for Trump!
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 16, 2024
Stephen Millies
The first question that must be asked about the shootings at the July 13 Trump rally is: who does it benefit? It’s obviously Trump himself.
Gaza is still being bombed! The struggle must go forward
All it took was a bloody ear for the corporate media to place a phony crown of martyrdom on the billionaire’s head. Florida Senator Marco Rubio declared, “God protected Donald Trump.”
Nobody is protecting 1.8 million poor people in Florida who have been kicked off Medicaid.
The spectacle at the Butler, Pennsylvania, fairgrounds was televised and conveniently occurred just days before Trump’s coronation at the Republican National Convention.
However, Saturday’s event doesn’t pass the smell test for millions of poor and working people. The alleged shooter, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, was killed at the scene. Dead people can be blamed but can’t testify.
Once again, it’s claimed that a wannabe assassin was a “lone nut.” No motive has been ascribed to Crooks.
With dozens of police and Secret Service agents present, how was Crooks allegedly able to climb up on a roof overlooking Trump’s rally without being stopped?
It should be recalled that former Vice President Mike Pence feared being kidnapped by pro-Trump Secret Service agents on Jan. 6, 2021, and taken to Andrews Air Force Base. He would then be prevented from presiding over the count of the electoral votes in the capitol.
President Biden lectured people on July 14, declaring, “We can’t allow this violence to be normalized.” What about the violence in Gaza, Mr. President? At least 40,000 Palestinians have been killed there with bombs and shells you’ve shipped to Netanyahu.
‘As ye sow so shall ye reap’
Donald Trump has a long history of advocating and committing violence. His rallies are up-to-date Ku Klux Klan cross-burnings.
Syria was bombed and occupied throughout Trump’s presidency. His imposition of economic sanctions against Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Zimbabwe, and other countries were acts of wanton violence that resulted in hunger and a lack of medical supplies.
Trump had Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani assassinated by a U.S. drone strike on Jan. 3, 2020. Soleimani was on a peace mission — mending relations between Saudi Arabia and Iraq — when he was murdered along with four Iraqi government officials at Baghdad International Airport. Among them was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, commander of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces.
These murders were violations of international law and an act of war against both Iran and Iraq. Trump deserves Nuremberg justice for this bloody crime.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads calling for a return of the death penalty in response to the arrest of five Black and Latinx teenagers on rape and assault charges.
The Exonerated Five — Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana and Korey Wise — were framed and spent years in prison before authorities admitted they were not guilty. Yusef Salaam is now a member of the New York City Council.
The capitalist media is virtually conceding Trump’s election. They are seeking to demoralize poor and working people, as well as all activists.
Whoever wins the November election — U.S. presidential elections are really selections by the wealthy and powerful — we have to struggle. Both Trump and Biden are war criminals.
We have to continue to organize and protest. One of the first steps is confronting war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu when he speaks to Congress on July 24.
The people united will never be defeated!
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/07/ ... for-trump/
Trump: An Asset, Not a ‘Threat to the Deep State’
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 16, 2024
– Major security lapses raise questions regarding the nature of the assassination attempt on former US President Donald Trump now 2024 US presidential candidate;
– Whether successful or not, the violence was meant to divert public attention away from on going foreign and domestic crises and deepen public attention in animosity among themselves and in what is an inconsequential election;
– The true nature of US security and law enforcement agencies necessitates serious suspicions regarding the official narrative of events;
US Secret Service Failures
1. The huge American flag flying over Trump’s head served as the ideal wind flag, indicating for a potential assassin wind speed and direction – such indicators are used on ALL military/security firing ranges, such indicators should have been prohibited by security;
2. All potential positions for an assassin were almost certainly assessed, video evidence suggests security had snipers pointed in their direction, but apparently access to them left unguarded.
If the audience saw the assassin moving into an obvious firing position, trained snipers with scopes certainly did;
It is difficult to believe the US Secret Service was so systematically incompetent.
pic.twitter.com/XURpm4XM38
— Brian Berletic (@BrianJBerletic) July 14, 2024
Following a shooting at a rally in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump’s supporters have portrayed him as a so-called “threat to the US deep state”. But in reality, Trump was a warmonger as president, and appointed top CIA officials and neoconservatives to run his foreign policy.
In the following video and podcast, Ben Norton reviews Trump’s support for Israel and Ukraine and his aggressive policies against China, Russia, Palestine, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba.
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/07/ ... eep-state/
******
The Assassination Attempt on Donald Trump and Political Violence Waged by the U.S.
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 17 Jul 2024
Iranian general Qassem Soleimani's body was identified only by a ring on his severed hand after Donald Trump ordered his assassination.
The words “political violence” are the latest hackneyed and dishonest phrase emanating from the political class. The assassination attempt on Donald Trump was a minor affair compared to the treatment that the U.S. state doles out around the world and even to its own people.
On January 3, 2020, Iranian general Qassem Soleimani and nine other people were killed by a United States drone strike under the orders of President Donald Trump . Soleimani was in Baghdad, Iraq to meet with Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi in order to broker a peace initiative between Iran and Saudi Arabia, two nations which had been antagonists for many years.
At the time Joe Biden was a presidential candidate and he issued a “Statement from Vice President Joe Biden on the Killing of Qassem Soleimani .” Biden said, “No American will mourn Qassem Soleimani’s passing. He deserved to be brought to justice for his crimes against American troops and thousands of innocents throughout the region. He supported terror and sowed chaos.”
Everything Biden said about Soleimani was untrue. There was no evidence of Iran fighting U.S. troops in Iraq. It is the U.S. that killed thousands of people in the region after its 2003 invasion of that country. The lies about Soleimani were spread in order to justify killing him and preventing Iran from improving relations with a U.S. ally. It is important to remember this and other examples of state terrorism practiced by the United States now that we are inundated with hypocritical platitudes in the wake of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
Before the July 13th assassination attempt which killed one person, injured two others, and resulted in the death of the alleged shooter, we were told that Trump posed an existential threat to democracy and was hell bent on dictatorship and the murders of his opponents. Establishment corporate media like The New Republic even portrayed him as a new Adolf Hitler.
After being harangued by Democratic Party assertions that democracy itself was on the ballot, suddenly we were exhorted to pray for Trump and for his entire family. Not only was the devil suddenly turned into an angel but history itself was rewritten in the process. President Biden informed the public that political violence was to be condemned and also claimed that it doesn’t even exist in this country. "But the idea, the idea that there's political violence or violence in America like this, is just unheard of, it’s just not appropriate." Then again, Soleimani was assassinated in Iraq. Perhaps the rejection of violence ends at the U.S. borders.
Of course, that assertion is also untrue. Presidents Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley, and John F. Kennedy were assassinated . Franklin Roosevelt survived an assassination attempt shortly before his inauguration as did Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan while in office.
Biden was joined by others who were tripping over themselves to offer thoughts, prayers and condemnation of the violence that they usually sign onto. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned political violence and wished Trump a “speedy recovery.” Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries left no stone unturned as he offered thoughts, prayers, wishes for a full recovery and also condemnation of political violence. Democratic pundit Van Jones , once a Maoist and now firmly a member of the political class, expressed happiness that Trump is still alive. “I’m so glad that Donald Trump is alive, I’m so glad, I’m so glad he’s alive, I’m so glad his family is not having to bury a father and a grandfather.”
The crocodile tears were proof that depicting Trump as the embodiment of evil is a desperate attempt to obscure the Democratic Party’s failures and, in the process, stave off a defeat that is looking more likely. Biden has been struggling in the polls for months, and his debate performance revealed that the party’s leadership has been lying about his health for four years. Biden’s legislative agenda, such as it was, was undone by the greedy capitalist oligarchy that refused to allow even the tiniest crumbs of help for the masses of people. All that was left was demonizing Trump until fate intervened and took that weapon away from them.
Not only were we awash in nonsense but none of these people now paying homage to Trump mentioned the political violence that took place the same day in Gaza, as Israeli forces killed nearly 100 Palestinians in an effort to assassinate Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif . Not one member of congress expressed condolences, condemnation, thoughts, or prayers about this latest Israeli war crime. The atrocity received scant attention in corporate media, and the same officials who regularly vote to give Israel billions of dollars were in all probability relieved that they were not called upon to comment on their handiwork.
Perhaps the use of the term “political violence” is an admission that the U.S. is awash in violence perpetrated by its states and by individuals against one another. But no distinctions should be allowed. Police in this country have killed 704 people this year. They are on track to exceed the 1,352 victims in 2023. Surely that violence is political. Political prisoners languishing in prison for decades are victims of political violence. It can be argued that everyone caught up in the 50-year-long acceleration of the mass incarceration prison state is also victimized by political violence.
Donald Trump was very lucky as he was merely grazed on his ear during the shooting. Qassem Soleimani was quite literally blown to bits on Trump’s orders. He was identified only by a ring on his finger. His body was otherwise unidentifiable. The U.S. doesn’t play around with its political violence. If a former president is targeted by a would-be assassin or if a seemingly ordinary person decides to shoot up a school or shopping mall we get the same fake concern and pretend bewilderment. The same country that assassinates foreign leaders or U.S. citizens like Anwar Al-Awlaki and his son Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki, who were killed by drone strikes on the orders of Barack Obama, expresses confusion when the violence hits home. It is not possible for the same country that spends more on the military than any other, that has more than 800 bases around the world, and that regularly attacks the sovereignty of other nations in a variety of ways, to be shocked when anyone is shot, whether the victim is a former president or John Q. Public.
Pretend outrage and pretend political differences go hand in hand in the United States. Denial is a running theme in politics, especially in a presidential election year. While Trump is lauded for heroism for raising his fist after being grazed on his ear, Soleimani’s broken body and those of the 186,000 Palestinians in Gaza are consigned to selective amnesia. Political violence is the default position in this country and not an aberration.
https://blackagendareport.com/assassina ... e-waged-us
Political violence has no place— Like home?
Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence 17 Jul 2024
Donald Trump tackled by Secret Service
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
“the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today—
my own government ….”
—Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
“Violence is as American as cherry pie.”
—H. Rap Brown/Jamil al-Amin
“Can’t you just shoot them?
Shoot them in their legs or something?”
He asked
As Arab Spring morphed into Occupy,
Into George Floyd Summer, into Black
Lives Matter marchers; Marching most of May
When spring street heat blossomed like roses from concrete—
Tweet sent unmarked cars of gun thugs, snatching activists off
Portland streets
“We sent in US Marshals” and “fifteen minutes it was over!”
Gloated Boss Tweet, after sending assassins to extrajudicially
Erase an anti-racist resister
“I am your warrior,
I am your justice,
I am your retribution—
We will root out Marxists, Communists
Living like vermin …”
Führer-Mussolini-like, Boss Tweet crowed to cult
“Why can’t we use nuclear weapons?”
He once asked.
No nuke. MOAB— Mother Of All Bombs—A-OK
For Afghanistan. Only smoked several dozen innocents.
Wow, how cool was it whacking an Iranian general—on
Iraqi soil!
“Finish the job!” he barked at Genocide Joe regarding Gaza.
Executing 13 death row prisoners exiting the War House he
Should know …
Weaponizing words and low-Barr lawyers like disgraced, dis-
barred drunkard, Count Ghouliani, he made poll workers lives
Living hell!
Bleach briefings. Death panel press conferences. Duct-
Taped mouths of scientists. Red nose,
Big shoe shows crushed lives of 500,000+
Loved ones like cigarette butts … during the pandemic
Dictator For A Day, or a Mad Celebrity Chef ?
Recipes hurling us into the fascist food processor
Making Amerikkka Grate/Grind/Puree/Whip/Frappé—
And force-feeding us Führer-Mussolini mashups?
Grinding gestapo boot heels in pureed Pinochet faces? Unsavory,
Unjust desserts with 17 year shelf lives—Code word: DAY ONE?
Let’s let Mad Celebrity Chef; Dictator For A Day;
Overseas-owned Boss Tweet be our warrior …
Running Lompoc’s or Leavenworth’s yard for
Exercise. Minus golf cart. Minus driving, putting …
Minus minions and cultist caddies chasing down his
Balls ...
© 2024. Raymond Nat Turner, The Town Crier. All Rights Reserved.
*******
Sugar Daddy of Trump’s VP Pick Has Deep Ties to CIA
By Jeremy Kuzmarov - July 16, 2024 0
Left to right, J. D. Vance and Peter Thiel. [Source: foxbusiness.com]
Vance’s top funder, Peter Thiel, co-founded the data-analytics company Palantir, which has the CIA as a client, and was an early investor in Facebook, the CIA’s “wet dream.”
Surging in the polls after surviving an assassination attempt, Donald Trump boosted his prospects of becoming the next president by nominating J. D. Vance as his vice president.
Vance is an Ohio Senator whose best-selling memoir Hillbilly Elegy positioned him as a politician who could empathize with people living in poverty in the Rust Belt.
Hillbilly Elegy recounted Vance’s upbringing in a poor family that also served as a sort of sociological examination of white working-class Americans.
[Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Less well known about Vance is his intricate ties to billionaire Peter Thiel, who has enabled Vance’s political career.
According to The San Francisco Standard, it was Thiel who, in 2017, hired Vance to work at his Silicon Valley Mithril Capital firm and later invested heavily in Vance’s firm, Narya Capital.
Thiel then donated more than $15 million to Vance’s 2022 Senate campaign and escorted Vance to Mar-a-Lago to patch over his former “Never Trump” stance.
Thiel also introduced Vance to David Sacks, the Chief Operating Officer of PayPal, who donated $1 million to Vance’s Super PAC and hosted a fundraiser for him.[1]
Peter Thiel [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Thiel’s connection to the CIA is apparent in the fact that he was an early investor in Facebook, the “CIA’s wet dream,” since Facebook users voluntarily put information about themselves online.
Facebook’s first president, Sean Parker, was recruited by the CIA at sixteen after he had been busted by the FBI for hacking corporate and military databases.
In September 2004, thanks to Parker, Thiel formally acquired $500,000 worth of Facebook shares and was added to its board.
Sean Parker [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
In 2003, Thiel co-founded Palantir, a data-analytics company whose software is said to represent the “ultimate tool of surveillance.”[2]
Named after the omniscient crystal balls in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy, Palantir’s success was enabled by a $2 million investment from In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm.
According to a former intelligence official who was directly involved with In-Q-Tel’s investment, the Agency hoped that tapping the tech expertise of Silicon Valley would enable it to integrate widely disparate sources of data.
During the first five years of its existence, Palantir’s chief client was the CIA.
[Source: archyde.com]
John Poindexter [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Journalist Mark Bowden credited Palantir with perfecting the data collection and analysis that Iran-Contra felon John Poindexter had initiated with Total Information Awareness (TIA), a Pentagon surveillance system he helped to develop in the aftermath of 9/11 that the ACLU warned would “kill privacy in America” because “every aspect of our lives would be catalogued.”[3]
Palantir worked for the Pentagon and CIA in Afghanistan and Iraq, where U.S. spies and Special Forces deployed its software to synthesize the blizzard of battlefield intelligence, and to avoid roadside bombs, track insurgents for assassination, and hunt down Osama bin Laden.
An unwelcome party for Palantir after it moved to new headquarters in Denver from Silicon Valley. [Source: 5280.com]
Avril Haines [Source: counterinformationblog.blogspot.com]
Before her appointment as Director of National Intelligence in January 2021, Avril Haines, the former CIA Deputy Director, was paid $180,000 by Palantir as a consultant.
Palantir has been heavily involved in the Ukraine War by supplying Ukraine with software systems to help it target Russian tanks and track Russian troop movements.
After meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Palantir CEO Alex Karp told David Ignatius of The Washington Post that “Palantir AI was ‘winning’ the war for Ukraine.”
Vance’s ties to Thiel and Palantir make it likely that he would help advance the surveillance state and military-industrial-intelligence complex.
Zelensky in the Presidential Palace with Palantir CEO Alex Karp. [Source: rubryka.com]
Vance may want to de-escalate the conflict with Russia in Ukraine; however, he is a staunch China hawk who wants to pivot the U.S. military to Southeast Asia to confront the Chinese and would create more opportunities for Palantir there.[4]
Recipient of large-scale funding from the Republican Jewish Committee, Vance has also echoed Trump’s call for Israel to “finish the job” against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
In 2024, not coincidentally, Palantir held its first board meeting in Tel Aviv and signed a strategic partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defense.
Palantir’s Peter Thiel and Alex Karp pose with Israeli Ministry of Defense officials. [Source: calcalistech.com]
A work of fraud. [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Looking at the big picture, Vance appears like Barack Obama to be a kind of Manchurian candidate.
His book, Hillbilly Elegy, which was made into a successful film, helped to give him a public persona that was deeply misleading, much like Obama’s book Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (New York: Times Books, 1995).
The Obama book helped sell him to the American electorate as a symbol of multi-culturalism though he (or his ghost-writer) lied about his family story, whitewashed his family’s connection to the CIA and the 1965-1967 Indonesian genocide, and ridiculed the Black Power Movement and 1960s New Left.[5]
In Vance’s case, his carefully crafted persona as a “hillbilly” from a dysfunctional family who can relate to the working class masks his affiliations with elite universities (he is a graduate of Yale Law School) and Silicon Valley and close ties to the billionaire class and warfare and surveillance states.
1.Vance appears to have first met Thiel at a talk Thiel gave at Yale Law School about technological stagnation and the decline of American elites. In the talk, Thiel stressed that, if technological innovation were actually driving prosperity, American elites would not feel increasingly competitive with one another over a dwindling number of prestigious outcomes. Vance called Thiel’s talk “the most significant moment” of his time at Yale. ↑
2.New York Magazine reported that Palantir was set up to ingest the mountains of data collected by soldiers and spies and police—fingerprints, signals intelligence, bank records, tips from confidential informants—and enable users to spot hidden relationships, uncover criminal and terrorist networks, and even anticipate future attacks. ↑
3.Poindexter met with Thiel, who picked Poindexter’s brain for ideas in the development of Palantir. ↑
4.Vance has also called for using the power of the U.S. military to go after Mexican drug cartels, a view popular on the right. ↑
5.See Jeremy Kuzmarov, Obama’s Unending Wars: Fronting the Foreign Policy of the Permanent Warfare State (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2019). ↑
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/0 ... es-to-cia/
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 16, 2024
Stephen Millies
The first question that must be asked about the shootings at the July 13 Trump rally is: who does it benefit? It’s obviously Trump himself.
Gaza is still being bombed! The struggle must go forward
All it took was a bloody ear for the corporate media to place a phony crown of martyrdom on the billionaire’s head. Florida Senator Marco Rubio declared, “God protected Donald Trump.”
Nobody is protecting 1.8 million poor people in Florida who have been kicked off Medicaid.
The spectacle at the Butler, Pennsylvania, fairgrounds was televised and conveniently occurred just days before Trump’s coronation at the Republican National Convention.
However, Saturday’s event doesn’t pass the smell test for millions of poor and working people. The alleged shooter, 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, was killed at the scene. Dead people can be blamed but can’t testify.
Once again, it’s claimed that a wannabe assassin was a “lone nut.” No motive has been ascribed to Crooks.
With dozens of police and Secret Service agents present, how was Crooks allegedly able to climb up on a roof overlooking Trump’s rally without being stopped?
It should be recalled that former Vice President Mike Pence feared being kidnapped by pro-Trump Secret Service agents on Jan. 6, 2021, and taken to Andrews Air Force Base. He would then be prevented from presiding over the count of the electoral votes in the capitol.
President Biden lectured people on July 14, declaring, “We can’t allow this violence to be normalized.” What about the violence in Gaza, Mr. President? At least 40,000 Palestinians have been killed there with bombs and shells you’ve shipped to Netanyahu.
‘As ye sow so shall ye reap’
Donald Trump has a long history of advocating and committing violence. His rallies are up-to-date Ku Klux Klan cross-burnings.
Syria was bombed and occupied throughout Trump’s presidency. His imposition of economic sanctions against Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Zimbabwe, and other countries were acts of wanton violence that resulted in hunger and a lack of medical supplies.
Trump had Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani assassinated by a U.S. drone strike on Jan. 3, 2020. Soleimani was on a peace mission — mending relations between Saudi Arabia and Iraq — when he was murdered along with four Iraqi government officials at Baghdad International Airport. Among them was Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, commander of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces.
These murders were violations of international law and an act of war against both Iran and Iraq. Trump deserves Nuremberg justice for this bloody crime.
In 1989, Trump took out full-page ads calling for a return of the death penalty in response to the arrest of five Black and Latinx teenagers on rape and assault charges.
The Exonerated Five — Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana and Korey Wise — were framed and spent years in prison before authorities admitted they were not guilty. Yusef Salaam is now a member of the New York City Council.
The capitalist media is virtually conceding Trump’s election. They are seeking to demoralize poor and working people, as well as all activists.
Whoever wins the November election — U.S. presidential elections are really selections by the wealthy and powerful — we have to struggle. Both Trump and Biden are war criminals.
We have to continue to organize and protest. One of the first steps is confronting war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu when he speaks to Congress on July 24.
The people united will never be defeated!
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/07/ ... for-trump/
Trump: An Asset, Not a ‘Threat to the Deep State’
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 16, 2024
– Major security lapses raise questions regarding the nature of the assassination attempt on former US President Donald Trump now 2024 US presidential candidate;
– Whether successful or not, the violence was meant to divert public attention away from on going foreign and domestic crises and deepen public attention in animosity among themselves and in what is an inconsequential election;
– The true nature of US security and law enforcement agencies necessitates serious suspicions regarding the official narrative of events;
US Secret Service Failures
1. The huge American flag flying over Trump’s head served as the ideal wind flag, indicating for a potential assassin wind speed and direction – such indicators are used on ALL military/security firing ranges, such indicators should have been prohibited by security;
2. All potential positions for an assassin were almost certainly assessed, video evidence suggests security had snipers pointed in their direction, but apparently access to them left unguarded.
If the audience saw the assassin moving into an obvious firing position, trained snipers with scopes certainly did;
It is difficult to believe the US Secret Service was so systematically incompetent.
pic.twitter.com/XURpm4XM38
— Brian Berletic (@BrianJBerletic) July 14, 2024
Following a shooting at a rally in Pennsylvania, Donald Trump’s supporters have portrayed him as a so-called “threat to the US deep state”. But in reality, Trump was a warmonger as president, and appointed top CIA officials and neoconservatives to run his foreign policy.
In the following video and podcast, Ben Norton reviews Trump’s support for Israel and Ukraine and his aggressive policies against China, Russia, Palestine, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Bolivia, Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba.
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/07/ ... eep-state/
******
The Assassination Attempt on Donald Trump and Political Violence Waged by the U.S.
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 17 Jul 2024
Iranian general Qassem Soleimani's body was identified only by a ring on his severed hand after Donald Trump ordered his assassination.
The words “political violence” are the latest hackneyed and dishonest phrase emanating from the political class. The assassination attempt on Donald Trump was a minor affair compared to the treatment that the U.S. state doles out around the world and even to its own people.
On January 3, 2020, Iranian general Qassem Soleimani and nine other people were killed by a United States drone strike under the orders of President Donald Trump . Soleimani was in Baghdad, Iraq to meet with Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi in order to broker a peace initiative between Iran and Saudi Arabia, two nations which had been antagonists for many years.
At the time Joe Biden was a presidential candidate and he issued a “Statement from Vice President Joe Biden on the Killing of Qassem Soleimani .” Biden said, “No American will mourn Qassem Soleimani’s passing. He deserved to be brought to justice for his crimes against American troops and thousands of innocents throughout the region. He supported terror and sowed chaos.”
Everything Biden said about Soleimani was untrue. There was no evidence of Iran fighting U.S. troops in Iraq. It is the U.S. that killed thousands of people in the region after its 2003 invasion of that country. The lies about Soleimani were spread in order to justify killing him and preventing Iran from improving relations with a U.S. ally. It is important to remember this and other examples of state terrorism practiced by the United States now that we are inundated with hypocritical platitudes in the wake of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
Before the July 13th assassination attempt which killed one person, injured two others, and resulted in the death of the alleged shooter, we were told that Trump posed an existential threat to democracy and was hell bent on dictatorship and the murders of his opponents. Establishment corporate media like The New Republic even portrayed him as a new Adolf Hitler.
After being harangued by Democratic Party assertions that democracy itself was on the ballot, suddenly we were exhorted to pray for Trump and for his entire family. Not only was the devil suddenly turned into an angel but history itself was rewritten in the process. President Biden informed the public that political violence was to be condemned and also claimed that it doesn’t even exist in this country. "But the idea, the idea that there's political violence or violence in America like this, is just unheard of, it’s just not appropriate." Then again, Soleimani was assassinated in Iraq. Perhaps the rejection of violence ends at the U.S. borders.
Of course, that assertion is also untrue. Presidents Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley, and John F. Kennedy were assassinated . Franklin Roosevelt survived an assassination attempt shortly before his inauguration as did Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan while in office.
Biden was joined by others who were tripping over themselves to offer thoughts, prayers and condemnation of the violence that they usually sign onto. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned political violence and wished Trump a “speedy recovery.” Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries left no stone unturned as he offered thoughts, prayers, wishes for a full recovery and also condemnation of political violence. Democratic pundit Van Jones , once a Maoist and now firmly a member of the political class, expressed happiness that Trump is still alive. “I’m so glad that Donald Trump is alive, I’m so glad, I’m so glad he’s alive, I’m so glad his family is not having to bury a father and a grandfather.”
The crocodile tears were proof that depicting Trump as the embodiment of evil is a desperate attempt to obscure the Democratic Party’s failures and, in the process, stave off a defeat that is looking more likely. Biden has been struggling in the polls for months, and his debate performance revealed that the party’s leadership has been lying about his health for four years. Biden’s legislative agenda, such as it was, was undone by the greedy capitalist oligarchy that refused to allow even the tiniest crumbs of help for the masses of people. All that was left was demonizing Trump until fate intervened and took that weapon away from them.
Not only were we awash in nonsense but none of these people now paying homage to Trump mentioned the political violence that took place the same day in Gaza, as Israeli forces killed nearly 100 Palestinians in an effort to assassinate Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif . Not one member of congress expressed condolences, condemnation, thoughts, or prayers about this latest Israeli war crime. The atrocity received scant attention in corporate media, and the same officials who regularly vote to give Israel billions of dollars were in all probability relieved that they were not called upon to comment on their handiwork.
Perhaps the use of the term “political violence” is an admission that the U.S. is awash in violence perpetrated by its states and by individuals against one another. But no distinctions should be allowed. Police in this country have killed 704 people this year. They are on track to exceed the 1,352 victims in 2023. Surely that violence is political. Political prisoners languishing in prison for decades are victims of political violence. It can be argued that everyone caught up in the 50-year-long acceleration of the mass incarceration prison state is also victimized by political violence.
Donald Trump was very lucky as he was merely grazed on his ear during the shooting. Qassem Soleimani was quite literally blown to bits on Trump’s orders. He was identified only by a ring on his finger. His body was otherwise unidentifiable. The U.S. doesn’t play around with its political violence. If a former president is targeted by a would-be assassin or if a seemingly ordinary person decides to shoot up a school or shopping mall we get the same fake concern and pretend bewilderment. The same country that assassinates foreign leaders or U.S. citizens like Anwar Al-Awlaki and his son Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki, who were killed by drone strikes on the orders of Barack Obama, expresses confusion when the violence hits home. It is not possible for the same country that spends more on the military than any other, that has more than 800 bases around the world, and that regularly attacks the sovereignty of other nations in a variety of ways, to be shocked when anyone is shot, whether the victim is a former president or John Q. Public.
Pretend outrage and pretend political differences go hand in hand in the United States. Denial is a running theme in politics, especially in a presidential election year. While Trump is lauded for heroism for raising his fist after being grazed on his ear, Soleimani’s broken body and those of the 186,000 Palestinians in Gaza are consigned to selective amnesia. Political violence is the default position in this country and not an aberration.
https://blackagendareport.com/assassina ... e-waged-us
Political violence has no place— Like home?
Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence 17 Jul 2024
Donald Trump tackled by Secret Service
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
“the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today—
my own government ….”
—Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
“Violence is as American as cherry pie.”
—H. Rap Brown/Jamil al-Amin
“Can’t you just shoot them?
Shoot them in their legs or something?”
He asked
As Arab Spring morphed into Occupy,
Into George Floyd Summer, into Black
Lives Matter marchers; Marching most of May
When spring street heat blossomed like roses from concrete—
Tweet sent unmarked cars of gun thugs, snatching activists off
Portland streets
“We sent in US Marshals” and “fifteen minutes it was over!”
Gloated Boss Tweet, after sending assassins to extrajudicially
Erase an anti-racist resister
“I am your warrior,
I am your justice,
I am your retribution—
We will root out Marxists, Communists
Living like vermin …”
Führer-Mussolini-like, Boss Tweet crowed to cult
“Why can’t we use nuclear weapons?”
He once asked.
No nuke. MOAB— Mother Of All Bombs—A-OK
For Afghanistan. Only smoked several dozen innocents.
Wow, how cool was it whacking an Iranian general—on
Iraqi soil!
“Finish the job!” he barked at Genocide Joe regarding Gaza.
Executing 13 death row prisoners exiting the War House he
Should know …
Weaponizing words and low-Barr lawyers like disgraced, dis-
barred drunkard, Count Ghouliani, he made poll workers lives
Living hell!
Bleach briefings. Death panel press conferences. Duct-
Taped mouths of scientists. Red nose,
Big shoe shows crushed lives of 500,000+
Loved ones like cigarette butts … during the pandemic
Dictator For A Day, or a Mad Celebrity Chef ?
Recipes hurling us into the fascist food processor
Making Amerikkka Grate/Grind/Puree/Whip/Frappé—
And force-feeding us Führer-Mussolini mashups?
Grinding gestapo boot heels in pureed Pinochet faces? Unsavory,
Unjust desserts with 17 year shelf lives—Code word: DAY ONE?
Let’s let Mad Celebrity Chef; Dictator For A Day;
Overseas-owned Boss Tweet be our warrior …
Running Lompoc’s or Leavenworth’s yard for
Exercise. Minus golf cart. Minus driving, putting …
Minus minions and cultist caddies chasing down his
Balls ...
© 2024. Raymond Nat Turner, The Town Crier. All Rights Reserved.
*******
Sugar Daddy of Trump’s VP Pick Has Deep Ties to CIA
By Jeremy Kuzmarov - July 16, 2024 0
Left to right, J. D. Vance and Peter Thiel. [Source: foxbusiness.com]
Vance’s top funder, Peter Thiel, co-founded the data-analytics company Palantir, which has the CIA as a client, and was an early investor in Facebook, the CIA’s “wet dream.”
Surging in the polls after surviving an assassination attempt, Donald Trump boosted his prospects of becoming the next president by nominating J. D. Vance as his vice president.
Vance is an Ohio Senator whose best-selling memoir Hillbilly Elegy positioned him as a politician who could empathize with people living in poverty in the Rust Belt.
Hillbilly Elegy recounted Vance’s upbringing in a poor family that also served as a sort of sociological examination of white working-class Americans.
[Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Less well known about Vance is his intricate ties to billionaire Peter Thiel, who has enabled Vance’s political career.
According to The San Francisco Standard, it was Thiel who, in 2017, hired Vance to work at his Silicon Valley Mithril Capital firm and later invested heavily in Vance’s firm, Narya Capital.
Thiel then donated more than $15 million to Vance’s 2022 Senate campaign and escorted Vance to Mar-a-Lago to patch over his former “Never Trump” stance.
Thiel also introduced Vance to David Sacks, the Chief Operating Officer of PayPal, who donated $1 million to Vance’s Super PAC and hosted a fundraiser for him.[1]
Peter Thiel [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Thiel’s connection to the CIA is apparent in the fact that he was an early investor in Facebook, the “CIA’s wet dream,” since Facebook users voluntarily put information about themselves online.
Facebook’s first president, Sean Parker, was recruited by the CIA at sixteen after he had been busted by the FBI for hacking corporate and military databases.
In September 2004, thanks to Parker, Thiel formally acquired $500,000 worth of Facebook shares and was added to its board.
Sean Parker [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
In 2003, Thiel co-founded Palantir, a data-analytics company whose software is said to represent the “ultimate tool of surveillance.”[2]
Named after the omniscient crystal balls in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings trilogy, Palantir’s success was enabled by a $2 million investment from In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm.
According to a former intelligence official who was directly involved with In-Q-Tel’s investment, the Agency hoped that tapping the tech expertise of Silicon Valley would enable it to integrate widely disparate sources of data.
During the first five years of its existence, Palantir’s chief client was the CIA.
[Source: archyde.com]
John Poindexter [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Journalist Mark Bowden credited Palantir with perfecting the data collection and analysis that Iran-Contra felon John Poindexter had initiated with Total Information Awareness (TIA), a Pentagon surveillance system he helped to develop in the aftermath of 9/11 that the ACLU warned would “kill privacy in America” because “every aspect of our lives would be catalogued.”[3]
Palantir worked for the Pentagon and CIA in Afghanistan and Iraq, where U.S. spies and Special Forces deployed its software to synthesize the blizzard of battlefield intelligence, and to avoid roadside bombs, track insurgents for assassination, and hunt down Osama bin Laden.
An unwelcome party for Palantir after it moved to new headquarters in Denver from Silicon Valley. [Source: 5280.com]
Avril Haines [Source: counterinformationblog.blogspot.com]
Before her appointment as Director of National Intelligence in January 2021, Avril Haines, the former CIA Deputy Director, was paid $180,000 by Palantir as a consultant.
Palantir has been heavily involved in the Ukraine War by supplying Ukraine with software systems to help it target Russian tanks and track Russian troop movements.
After meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Palantir CEO Alex Karp told David Ignatius of The Washington Post that “Palantir AI was ‘winning’ the war for Ukraine.”
Vance’s ties to Thiel and Palantir make it likely that he would help advance the surveillance state and military-industrial-intelligence complex.
Zelensky in the Presidential Palace with Palantir CEO Alex Karp. [Source: rubryka.com]
Vance may want to de-escalate the conflict with Russia in Ukraine; however, he is a staunch China hawk who wants to pivot the U.S. military to Southeast Asia to confront the Chinese and would create more opportunities for Palantir there.[4]
Recipient of large-scale funding from the Republican Jewish Committee, Vance has also echoed Trump’s call for Israel to “finish the job” against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
In 2024, not coincidentally, Palantir held its first board meeting in Tel Aviv and signed a strategic partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Defense.
Palantir’s Peter Thiel and Alex Karp pose with Israeli Ministry of Defense officials. [Source: calcalistech.com]
A work of fraud. [Source: en.wikipedia.org]
Looking at the big picture, Vance appears like Barack Obama to be a kind of Manchurian candidate.
His book, Hillbilly Elegy, which was made into a successful film, helped to give him a public persona that was deeply misleading, much like Obama’s book Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (New York: Times Books, 1995).
The Obama book helped sell him to the American electorate as a symbol of multi-culturalism though he (or his ghost-writer) lied about his family story, whitewashed his family’s connection to the CIA and the 1965-1967 Indonesian genocide, and ridiculed the Black Power Movement and 1960s New Left.[5]
In Vance’s case, his carefully crafted persona as a “hillbilly” from a dysfunctional family who can relate to the working class masks his affiliations with elite universities (he is a graduate of Yale Law School) and Silicon Valley and close ties to the billionaire class and warfare and surveillance states.
1.Vance appears to have first met Thiel at a talk Thiel gave at Yale Law School about technological stagnation and the decline of American elites. In the talk, Thiel stressed that, if technological innovation were actually driving prosperity, American elites would not feel increasingly competitive with one another over a dwindling number of prestigious outcomes. Vance called Thiel’s talk “the most significant moment” of his time at Yale. ↑
2.New York Magazine reported that Palantir was set up to ingest the mountains of data collected by soldiers and spies and police—fingerprints, signals intelligence, bank records, tips from confidential informants—and enable users to spot hidden relationships, uncover criminal and terrorist networks, and even anticipate future attacks. ↑
3.Poindexter met with Thiel, who picked Poindexter’s brain for ideas in the development of Palantir. ↑
4.Vance has also called for using the power of the U.S. military to go after Mexican drug cartels, a view popular on the right. ↑
5.See Jeremy Kuzmarov, Obama’s Unending Wars: Fronting the Foreign Policy of the Permanent Warfare State (Atlanta: Clarity Press, 2019). ↑
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/0 ... es-to-cia/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
US Republican Party puts full backing behind ultra-conservative program at National Convention
At its National Convention, the leading conservative party in the US promotes its presidential ticket and ultra-conservative platform
July 17, 2024 by Natalia Marques
J.D. Vance was chosen as Trump's Vice President, one of the most right-wing options for the ticket (Photo: Gage Skidmore)
The Republican National Convention, started on July 15, will continue until July 18 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The RNC officially confirmed former President Donald Trump as their nominee for the 2024 presidential elections, to take place in November.
Many in the US, of all political tendencies, were increasingly giving up on the prospect of a second Biden presidency even before Trump’s attempted assassination largely due to Biden’s disastrous debate performance and several political gaffes surrounding the NATO Summit. The Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago from August 19 to 22, where the Democrats will officially select their nominee for the presidency. Until the first presidential debate between Biden and Trump, Biden’s incumbent status and victory in the primary elections made him essentially a shoe-in for the nomination. Since then, Biden’s nomination has been widely called into question.
Trump’s second presidency seems increasingly inevitable, with polls from recent days predicting a clear Trump victory. Much of the RNC has been dedicated to deifying Trump, who was notably ridiculed by the Republican Party establishment when he first ran for president in 2016. Trump’s own pick of Vice President, Ohio Senator and bestselling author J.D. Vance, once lamented privately to a friend that he was not sure if Trump was simply a “cynical asshole” or “America’s Hitler.”
Vance and the “America First” comeback
Vance refused to vote for Trump in 2016. But like most of the Republican Party, even the most established and powerful figures within the party have fallen in line behind Trump. Even Marco Rubio, who ran a vicious primary campaign against Trump in 2016, hoped, in vain, to become Trump’s VP.
However, Vance has since become one of the most conservative politicians in Congress, fully embracing what has become known as the “America First” political ideology. This conservative tendency is a break from the “neo-conservative” ideology that brought some of the most brutal foreign interventions in US history, such as the invasion of Iraq. In contrast, “America First” is characterized by isolationism, including a fierce opposition towards military aid to Ukraine. However, while “America First” politicians reference policies that could ostensibly benefit workers, such as lowering inflation and cutting on foreign military aid, these politicians have no issue promoting New Cold War policies against China, or chipping away at the little social spending that exists in the US.
“Our God still delivers, and he still sets free. Because the devil came to Pennsylvania holding a rifle, but the American lion got back up on his feet,” said Senator Tim Scott, also a former Trump VP hopeful, on the first day of the convention, referring to the assassination attempt against the former president.
With its total capitulation to the ideology of Trump’s campaign and his base, the Republican Party seems to be attempting to mask a widely unpopular policy platform behind a pro-worker facade.
Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien addressed the convention on Monday, becoming the first Teamsters leader to speak at the Republican National Convention. O’Brien did not outright endorse him, and has reportedly also asked to speak at the DNC. According to a Teamsters spokesperson, the DNC has yet to accept that request.
The Republican Party is notoriously hostile to organized labor, responsible for some of the harshest anti-union legislation in the world, leaving workers in conservative states uniquely susceptible to exploitation. Workers in so-called “right to work” states, where unions are prohibited from ensuring every worker who enjoys union benefits pay union dues, weaken the power of trade unions in those states. Republican-controlled states often have less regulations on corporate greed across the board, with some of the lowest minimum wages in the country.
RNC platform proudly embraces xenophobia and militarism
Despite the RNC’s appeals to workers, the RNC is promoting one of the most politically backwards platforms as it puts its full support behind some of the most ultra-conservative politicians in the country. The Republicans put their attack on migrants front and center in their policy platform, pledging to “carry out the largest deportation operation in American history,” as well as completing Trump’s border wall (which Biden continued to build).
Indeed, the platform, while emphasizing isolationism, also does not shy away from furthering US militarism. “Keeping the American People safe requires a strong America. The Biden administration’s weak Foreign Policy has made us less safe and a laughingstock all over the World,” the platform states. “The Republican Plan is to return Peace through Strength, rebuilding our Military and Alliances, countering China, defeating terrorism, building an Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield, promoting American Values, securing our Homeland and Borders, and reviving our Defense Industrial Base.”
Vance’s selection as VP, as one of the most conservative options that Trump could have possibly gone with, also signals the further entrenchment of the Republican Party with its ultra right-wing. “Vance’s nomination to be Trump’s running mate signals that the Republicans are doubling down on their false appeal as fighters for working people. In reality Vance is a Silicon Valley capitalist committed to militarism and boosting the profits of big business. His appointment, rather than a figure who would be considered more moderate like Doug Burgum, suggests that hardline repressive policies like a mass deportation campaign are likely under a potential second Trump administration,” Walter Smolarek, editor of Liberation News, told Peoples Dispatch. “Vance is also an anti-China fanatic, and would likely push for more and more escalation in the new Cold War.”
The 2024 US Presidential elections are now set to be a battle between the ultra-right represented by Trump, and the right-wing of the Democratic Party represented by Joe Biden. To find a true alternative to the right, people in the US may have to look outside of the two major parties.
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/07/17/ ... onvention/
(The so-called 'Left' wing of the Democratic Party is a gang of worthless posers whose uselessness only complements the viciousness of the Right in the mad drive towards national and planetary doom.)
*****
WHO IS JD VANCE, TRUMP'S RUNNING MATE?
17 Jul 2024 , 3:45 pm .
Donald Trump has chosen Ohio Senator JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate (Photo: AP)
Author and venture capitalist JD Vance has been chosen by former President Donald Trump as his vice presidential running mate in the race for the presidential nomination next November.
Vance beat out other finalists including North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and Sens. Tim Scott and Marco Rubio. The announcement came on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, as delegates were casting their votes for the nomination.
A POLITICO article provides a detailed profile of the Republican senator, highlighting his position as a staunch defender of the oil industry, who supports drilling and fracking, and criticizes renewable energy sources. He also expresses skepticism about the influence of human activity on climate change.
Since entering the Senate in 2023, Vance has consistently backed oil and gas interests, singling out President Joe Biden as a threat to American energy.
According to data from Open Secrets , the energy industry contributed more than $283,000 to Vance's 2022 election campaign, making him one of the candidates with the most funding from that sector.
Vance’s influence on the political calculus, particularly in states like Pennsylvania, a major energy producer, could be significant, the article notes. His selection as Trump’s running mate also demonstrates a strategy focused on winning the support of American workers and farmers in a number of states. Mike Chadsey, spokesman for the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, praised Vance for his understanding of the oil industry and its practices.
JD Vance closely aligns himself with former President Donald Trump’s views on energy and vehemently defends practices like hydraulic fracturing, or fracking . In an op-ed last August, Vance highlighted the importance of technologies like horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing to tap natural resources present in Ohio’s Utica shale oil and gas basin.
The senator has backed legislative initiatives such as the Energy Act and the Stove Act in an effort to protect the domestic energy and manufacturing industry. Vance has shown his opposition to policies of the Joe Biden administration that he says could harm American workers, such as the suspension of tariffs on Chinese solar components. He also introduced a bill to repeal the federal tax credit for electric vehicles, proposing instead tax credits for vehicles manufactured in the United States powered by gasoline or diesel, under the name "Drive American Act."
A TESTIMONY OF POVERTY AND DESPERATION IN THE USA
"Vance became a polarizing figure on a national scale in 2016 when he published his memoir, Hillbilly, a rural elegy about his childhood in southwestern Ohio. Fans of the book praised it as a portrait of escaping generational poverty in one of the most depressed regions of the United States, through education."
As POLITICO writes, a graduate of Yale Law School, Vance emerges as an observer and spokesperson for the complex reality of the marginalized white working class in the United States.
In an interview with The American Conservative , journalist and author Rod Dreher—who shares the Ohio senator's views—explains that Vance's autobiographical work stands as a powerful testimony to the vicissitudes and strengths of this marginalized social stratum, parallel to the impact that Ta-Nehisi Coates' iconic work, Between the World and Me , had on the representation of poor blacks in the public sphere.
Knowing firsthand the poverty and turmoil that frame life in Appalachia, Vance sheds light on a reality that the dominant elites dismiss. He recounts the bleak situation facing many communities where heroin addiction has taken root and outnumbered natural deaths. The social breakdown, marked by family instability and the constant presence of crime, is aggravated by economic aridity, "from factories closing their doors to main streets with nothing but cash-for-gold stores and pawn shops," Vance tells Dreher.
The abandonment by traditional political parties has led this community to seek answers in figures such as Donald Trump, whose apocalyptic speech resonates with their daily experiences.
"Donald Trump is at least trying," said Vance, who was initially critical of the then-president during the 2016 campaign but then underwent a significant shift to a pro-Trump stance during his 2022 Senate bid. Vance adopted a rhetoric in line with the former president's policies, criticizing "woke" movements and changing his approach to climate change.
According to Vance, Trump's popularity stems from the fact that he represents someone who is not afraid to speak his mind, something that many in the white working class see as an admirable quality. Unlike traditional politicians, the former president has stood out for breaking with political correctness and speaking in a way that is closer to the reality of ordinary people. Therefore, for many of his followers, Trump is someone they can identify with and feel represented by, despite his privileged position and elitist academic background.
JD VANCE'S NEW RIGHT
JD Vance's political position fits into the context of the "New American Right", a movement that encompasses a wide range of political influences and backgrounds as described by essayist and journalist James Pogue . In his words, the New Right has a diversity of influences ranging from 17th-century Jacobite monarchists to pseudo-Marxist cultural critics, reactionary feminists, and controversial figures such as Ted Kaczynski, famous for sending explosive letters in the United States during the 1990s.
This political current does not align itself with the traditional American conservative movement, but rather presents itself as a network of critical frameworks towards the systems of power and propaganda, which challenges what many people consider the conventional version of how the world works. In contrast to the American narrative of the last century, which promised a better future thanks to economic growth and technological innovation, this vision of the world takes an alternative and transgressive approach.
The new American right presents a wide diversity of currents and approaches, from nationalist conservatism and post-liberals, who advocate a return to traditional values, religious identity and an active role for the State in promoting family and morality, to the so-called "true intellectual elite", made up of writers, podcasters and users of X (formerly Twitter), who criticize liberal individualism, techno-authoritarianism and government bureaucracy.
Within these ideological extremes, Pogue says, Vance positions himself somewhere in the middle, fusing dissident online influences with a traditionalism rooted in the American right.
CPAC 2023
Trump supporters show off their political fervor at the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference (Photo: EFE)
Taking a critical view of the educated and culturally liberal elite, he raises the disparity between the economic and cultural interests of this elite and those of communities like Middletown, Ohio, where he grew up. For Vance, the neglect of what he calls the "real economy," represented by agricultural and manufacturing jobs, highlights a significant generational and cultural gap with the Reaganite generation of right-wingers. In his view, the culture war is as much an ideological struggle as a class issue.
Pogue quotes an interview with Vance in 2022:
“I have to be honest with you, I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine,” a joke that alludes to the fact that he believes the U.S.-led global order is as much about enriching defense contractors and think tankers as it is about defending U.S. interests. “I’m concerned about the fact that in my community right now, the leading cause of death among 18- to 45-year-olds is Mexican fentanyl.”
This view contrasts with his views on support for Israel. In a 2023 speech at the Quincy Institute, Vance defended US support for Israel as a key pillar of an "America First" foreign policy.
"I support Israel and its war against Hamas. I certainly admire the Ukrainians fighting against Russia, but I don't think it's in the United States' interest to continue to fund a virtually endless war in Ukraine," Vance said . "It's a little bit strange that this city assumes that Israel and Ukraine are exactly the same. They're not, of course, and I think it's important to look at them in separate categories."
Vance criticizes President Biden's stance on the war against Palestine, accusing him of delaying arms deliveries to Israel.
Similarly, Vance's view towards China is characterised by a hostile stance and a firm conviction that the Asian giant represents a threat to US interests, a position he shares with Donald Trump.
One of his most extreme stances is his suggestion that the U.S. military should shift its attention away from other conflicts and threats and toward China. He has also advocated for broad tariffs on Chinese imports and introduced legislation to restrict Chinese access to the U.S. financial system.
MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CONNECTIONS TO SILICON VALLEY
Vance's relationship with Silicon Valley heavyweight Peter Thiel sheds light on another important facet of the candidate: his connection to the tech sector. While he has presented himself as a critic of the tech giants, his close alliance with Thiel reveals a more nuanced stance.
This connection dates back to Vance’s work at Thiel’s global investment firm in 2017. Thiel subsequently donated $15 million to Vance’s campaign for Ohio Senate in 2022, helping him win the Republican primary and pick up the seat in the general election. Thiel’s net worth , valued at $7.9 billion, highlights his influence and power in the tech sector.
Thiel's endorsement was crucial to Vance's candidacy as it provided him with a significant financial advantage. A CBS News article adds:
"It's not entirely clear what Thiel might have wanted in return for his largesse. Thiel declined to comment for this article. Thiel's philosophy has been described as "techno-libertarian," but critics say it tends toward authoritarianism and even fascism. (He wrote in a libertarian magazine article in 2009: "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.")
"Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies and an early investor in Facebook, also has business interests with the U.S. government, which may be especially important at a time when the tech sector is under intense scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans."
With all these characteristics in mind, it is clear that Vance emerges as a singular figure in current American politics. Even with elements of his pro-Israel and anti-China stance, he still distinguishes himself as a character who challenges established Republican convention.
Vance manages to connect meaningfully with the emotions and frustrations of a sector of the American population that feels excluded and neglected by the elites. His ability to reflect the anxieties of the marginalized white working class makes him a key player in the Make America Great Again narrative that Donald Trump seeks to revitalize to secure a second presidency.
For all these reasons, which show closeness and harmony on structural issues of domestic and foreign policy but, above all, after the attack suffered last Saturday, July 13, the tycoon and presidential candidate ended up choosing JD Vance as his vice presidential running mate, a young politician not linked to the traditional sectors of Republican politics and a good prospect to inherit the Make America Great Again movement, of which Trump is the creator.
https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/qu ... l-de-trump
Google Translator
*******
(The following excerpt from a new Trumpist screed by Simpliticus who oughta stick to military analysis.)
But even if the latest developments have ensured that Trump should win the election, his near-assassination has taught us one very important lesson: that the Right will not “revolt” or wage some kind of dramatic, Hollywood-style civil war any time soon, even if further aggravations of a terminal sort occur, such as the total theft of the election later this year.
Many on the Right now brag that not a single fire was lit, nor a soul harmed in the wake of an open hit attempt on their candidate. However, some still cling to fantasies that were the shooter successful, an explosive civil war would have kicked off. But given the total normalcy and calm even in the face of near-disaster, it’s become evident that the majority of normal Americans will not “rise up” any time soon. Whether it’s a level of first world comfort that has yet to be totally eroded, or mass propagandizing, or the simple decades of docility imposed upon them by the establishment—it’s hard to know for sure. But it’s clear no one is going to “rise up” in the way some have imagined any time soon.
It has led me to contemplate what a potential civil war could actually look like if it did kick off, and what I’ve concluded is that it would have to be at the behest of strong State governments initiating some major anti-federal actions. Texas, for instance, could begin some of the anti-fed moves Governor Abbott promised long ago, leading to the call up of citizens into the National Guard or even declaring the call up of various state militias. Most people don’t know that the National Guard is actually State controlled, with the governor as its commander-in-chief. It only becomes ‘Federalized’ under an express order from the President for a specific Federal mission, which in such dire circumstances could be ignored by the State, thus spurring a conflict. Ron Desantis, in fact, has already threatened to do this, among other things.
This is what a real “civil war” would actually look like—not spontaneous Republicans armed with shotguns storming the streets when their candidate gets robbed for the second time in the election. However, if such a hypothetical State-led effort were to kick off, then it could spur more spontaneous citizens’ movements on the ground.
I mention all this because we began the article with the idea that we’re now living in a time of normalcy bias, where all the earlier ‘inconceivable’ scenarios are slowly coming to pass. As such, we can no longer totally dismiss the possibility that anything can happen during the forthcoming election, as the situation has now become more charged than ever.
(More at link...not recommended)
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/can ... pportunity
Like I've said before:
The 2020 election was not stolen. Get over it.
The 2000 election was stolen, in broad daylight.
The 2016 election would have been stolen if the gatekeepers had not been asleep at the wheel in their hubris.
I find it hard to believe that the spooks would entrust such an important operation to a patsy without having a ringer on hand to ensure the job. Perhaps I give them too much credit...Would the Dems take it upon themselves? The incompetence gives credence...
So, despite a couple of years of me saying Trump would be prevented from re-assuming the purple it's looking pretty inevitable at the moment. Thus as we see in today's Dem installment the bourgeoise rats are fleeing the ship hoping to ingratiate themselves with the new Nero.
Short of doing a 'Hugo Chavez'(induced acute cancer) or some subtle poison on the Orange Man I can't see what they could do and get away with it. But they are probably desperate as Trump has promised to clean their houses.
We are screwed either way and I guess we deserve it for allowing things to reach this point because the scraps from the rich's feast of human and environmental carnage were enough to keep us complacent. Mebbe this will teach us...
At its National Convention, the leading conservative party in the US promotes its presidential ticket and ultra-conservative platform
July 17, 2024 by Natalia Marques
J.D. Vance was chosen as Trump's Vice President, one of the most right-wing options for the ticket (Photo: Gage Skidmore)
The Republican National Convention, started on July 15, will continue until July 18 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The RNC officially confirmed former President Donald Trump as their nominee for the 2024 presidential elections, to take place in November.
Many in the US, of all political tendencies, were increasingly giving up on the prospect of a second Biden presidency even before Trump’s attempted assassination largely due to Biden’s disastrous debate performance and several political gaffes surrounding the NATO Summit. The Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago from August 19 to 22, where the Democrats will officially select their nominee for the presidency. Until the first presidential debate between Biden and Trump, Biden’s incumbent status and victory in the primary elections made him essentially a shoe-in for the nomination. Since then, Biden’s nomination has been widely called into question.
Trump’s second presidency seems increasingly inevitable, with polls from recent days predicting a clear Trump victory. Much of the RNC has been dedicated to deifying Trump, who was notably ridiculed by the Republican Party establishment when he first ran for president in 2016. Trump’s own pick of Vice President, Ohio Senator and bestselling author J.D. Vance, once lamented privately to a friend that he was not sure if Trump was simply a “cynical asshole” or “America’s Hitler.”
Vance and the “America First” comeback
Vance refused to vote for Trump in 2016. But like most of the Republican Party, even the most established and powerful figures within the party have fallen in line behind Trump. Even Marco Rubio, who ran a vicious primary campaign against Trump in 2016, hoped, in vain, to become Trump’s VP.
However, Vance has since become one of the most conservative politicians in Congress, fully embracing what has become known as the “America First” political ideology. This conservative tendency is a break from the “neo-conservative” ideology that brought some of the most brutal foreign interventions in US history, such as the invasion of Iraq. In contrast, “America First” is characterized by isolationism, including a fierce opposition towards military aid to Ukraine. However, while “America First” politicians reference policies that could ostensibly benefit workers, such as lowering inflation and cutting on foreign military aid, these politicians have no issue promoting New Cold War policies against China, or chipping away at the little social spending that exists in the US.
“Our God still delivers, and he still sets free. Because the devil came to Pennsylvania holding a rifle, but the American lion got back up on his feet,” said Senator Tim Scott, also a former Trump VP hopeful, on the first day of the convention, referring to the assassination attempt against the former president.
With its total capitulation to the ideology of Trump’s campaign and his base, the Republican Party seems to be attempting to mask a widely unpopular policy platform behind a pro-worker facade.
Teamsters General President Sean O’Brien addressed the convention on Monday, becoming the first Teamsters leader to speak at the Republican National Convention. O’Brien did not outright endorse him, and has reportedly also asked to speak at the DNC. According to a Teamsters spokesperson, the DNC has yet to accept that request.
The Republican Party is notoriously hostile to organized labor, responsible for some of the harshest anti-union legislation in the world, leaving workers in conservative states uniquely susceptible to exploitation. Workers in so-called “right to work” states, where unions are prohibited from ensuring every worker who enjoys union benefits pay union dues, weaken the power of trade unions in those states. Republican-controlled states often have less regulations on corporate greed across the board, with some of the lowest minimum wages in the country.
RNC platform proudly embraces xenophobia and militarism
Despite the RNC’s appeals to workers, the RNC is promoting one of the most politically backwards platforms as it puts its full support behind some of the most ultra-conservative politicians in the country. The Republicans put their attack on migrants front and center in their policy platform, pledging to “carry out the largest deportation operation in American history,” as well as completing Trump’s border wall (which Biden continued to build).
Indeed, the platform, while emphasizing isolationism, also does not shy away from furthering US militarism. “Keeping the American People safe requires a strong America. The Biden administration’s weak Foreign Policy has made us less safe and a laughingstock all over the World,” the platform states. “The Republican Plan is to return Peace through Strength, rebuilding our Military and Alliances, countering China, defeating terrorism, building an Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield, promoting American Values, securing our Homeland and Borders, and reviving our Defense Industrial Base.”
Vance’s selection as VP, as one of the most conservative options that Trump could have possibly gone with, also signals the further entrenchment of the Republican Party with its ultra right-wing. “Vance’s nomination to be Trump’s running mate signals that the Republicans are doubling down on their false appeal as fighters for working people. In reality Vance is a Silicon Valley capitalist committed to militarism and boosting the profits of big business. His appointment, rather than a figure who would be considered more moderate like Doug Burgum, suggests that hardline repressive policies like a mass deportation campaign are likely under a potential second Trump administration,” Walter Smolarek, editor of Liberation News, told Peoples Dispatch. “Vance is also an anti-China fanatic, and would likely push for more and more escalation in the new Cold War.”
The 2024 US Presidential elections are now set to be a battle between the ultra-right represented by Trump, and the right-wing of the Democratic Party represented by Joe Biden. To find a true alternative to the right, people in the US may have to look outside of the two major parties.
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/07/17/ ... onvention/
(The so-called 'Left' wing of the Democratic Party is a gang of worthless posers whose uselessness only complements the viciousness of the Right in the mad drive towards national and planetary doom.)
*****
WHO IS JD VANCE, TRUMP'S RUNNING MATE?
17 Jul 2024 , 3:45 pm .
Donald Trump has chosen Ohio Senator JD Vance as his vice presidential candidate (Photo: AP)
Author and venture capitalist JD Vance has been chosen by former President Donald Trump as his vice presidential running mate in the race for the presidential nomination next November.
Vance beat out other finalists including North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and Sens. Tim Scott and Marco Rubio. The announcement came on the first day of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, as delegates were casting their votes for the nomination.
A POLITICO article provides a detailed profile of the Republican senator, highlighting his position as a staunch defender of the oil industry, who supports drilling and fracking, and criticizes renewable energy sources. He also expresses skepticism about the influence of human activity on climate change.
Since entering the Senate in 2023, Vance has consistently backed oil and gas interests, singling out President Joe Biden as a threat to American energy.
According to data from Open Secrets , the energy industry contributed more than $283,000 to Vance's 2022 election campaign, making him one of the candidates with the most funding from that sector.
Vance’s influence on the political calculus, particularly in states like Pennsylvania, a major energy producer, could be significant, the article notes. His selection as Trump’s running mate also demonstrates a strategy focused on winning the support of American workers and farmers in a number of states. Mike Chadsey, spokesman for the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, praised Vance for his understanding of the oil industry and its practices.
JD Vance closely aligns himself with former President Donald Trump’s views on energy and vehemently defends practices like hydraulic fracturing, or fracking . In an op-ed last August, Vance highlighted the importance of technologies like horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing to tap natural resources present in Ohio’s Utica shale oil and gas basin.
The senator has backed legislative initiatives such as the Energy Act and the Stove Act in an effort to protect the domestic energy and manufacturing industry. Vance has shown his opposition to policies of the Joe Biden administration that he says could harm American workers, such as the suspension of tariffs on Chinese solar components. He also introduced a bill to repeal the federal tax credit for electric vehicles, proposing instead tax credits for vehicles manufactured in the United States powered by gasoline or diesel, under the name "Drive American Act."
A TESTIMONY OF POVERTY AND DESPERATION IN THE USA
"Vance became a polarizing figure on a national scale in 2016 when he published his memoir, Hillbilly, a rural elegy about his childhood in southwestern Ohio. Fans of the book praised it as a portrait of escaping generational poverty in one of the most depressed regions of the United States, through education."
As POLITICO writes, a graduate of Yale Law School, Vance emerges as an observer and spokesperson for the complex reality of the marginalized white working class in the United States.
In an interview with The American Conservative , journalist and author Rod Dreher—who shares the Ohio senator's views—explains that Vance's autobiographical work stands as a powerful testimony to the vicissitudes and strengths of this marginalized social stratum, parallel to the impact that Ta-Nehisi Coates' iconic work, Between the World and Me , had on the representation of poor blacks in the public sphere.
Knowing firsthand the poverty and turmoil that frame life in Appalachia, Vance sheds light on a reality that the dominant elites dismiss. He recounts the bleak situation facing many communities where heroin addiction has taken root and outnumbered natural deaths. The social breakdown, marked by family instability and the constant presence of crime, is aggravated by economic aridity, "from factories closing their doors to main streets with nothing but cash-for-gold stores and pawn shops," Vance tells Dreher.
The abandonment by traditional political parties has led this community to seek answers in figures such as Donald Trump, whose apocalyptic speech resonates with their daily experiences.
"Donald Trump is at least trying," said Vance, who was initially critical of the then-president during the 2016 campaign but then underwent a significant shift to a pro-Trump stance during his 2022 Senate bid. Vance adopted a rhetoric in line with the former president's policies, criticizing "woke" movements and changing his approach to climate change.
According to Vance, Trump's popularity stems from the fact that he represents someone who is not afraid to speak his mind, something that many in the white working class see as an admirable quality. Unlike traditional politicians, the former president has stood out for breaking with political correctness and speaking in a way that is closer to the reality of ordinary people. Therefore, for many of his followers, Trump is someone they can identify with and feel represented by, despite his privileged position and elitist academic background.
JD VANCE'S NEW RIGHT
JD Vance's political position fits into the context of the "New American Right", a movement that encompasses a wide range of political influences and backgrounds as described by essayist and journalist James Pogue . In his words, the New Right has a diversity of influences ranging from 17th-century Jacobite monarchists to pseudo-Marxist cultural critics, reactionary feminists, and controversial figures such as Ted Kaczynski, famous for sending explosive letters in the United States during the 1990s.
This political current does not align itself with the traditional American conservative movement, but rather presents itself as a network of critical frameworks towards the systems of power and propaganda, which challenges what many people consider the conventional version of how the world works. In contrast to the American narrative of the last century, which promised a better future thanks to economic growth and technological innovation, this vision of the world takes an alternative and transgressive approach.
The new American right presents a wide diversity of currents and approaches, from nationalist conservatism and post-liberals, who advocate a return to traditional values, religious identity and an active role for the State in promoting family and morality, to the so-called "true intellectual elite", made up of writers, podcasters and users of X (formerly Twitter), who criticize liberal individualism, techno-authoritarianism and government bureaucracy.
Within these ideological extremes, Pogue says, Vance positions himself somewhere in the middle, fusing dissident online influences with a traditionalism rooted in the American right.
CPAC 2023
Trump supporters show off their political fervor at the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference (Photo: EFE)
Taking a critical view of the educated and culturally liberal elite, he raises the disparity between the economic and cultural interests of this elite and those of communities like Middletown, Ohio, where he grew up. For Vance, the neglect of what he calls the "real economy," represented by agricultural and manufacturing jobs, highlights a significant generational and cultural gap with the Reaganite generation of right-wingers. In his view, the culture war is as much an ideological struggle as a class issue.
Pogue quotes an interview with Vance in 2022:
“I have to be honest with you, I don’t really care what happens to Ukraine,” a joke that alludes to the fact that he believes the U.S.-led global order is as much about enriching defense contractors and think tankers as it is about defending U.S. interests. “I’m concerned about the fact that in my community right now, the leading cause of death among 18- to 45-year-olds is Mexican fentanyl.”
This view contrasts with his views on support for Israel. In a 2023 speech at the Quincy Institute, Vance defended US support for Israel as a key pillar of an "America First" foreign policy.
"I support Israel and its war against Hamas. I certainly admire the Ukrainians fighting against Russia, but I don't think it's in the United States' interest to continue to fund a virtually endless war in Ukraine," Vance said . "It's a little bit strange that this city assumes that Israel and Ukraine are exactly the same. They're not, of course, and I think it's important to look at them in separate categories."
Vance criticizes President Biden's stance on the war against Palestine, accusing him of delaying arms deliveries to Israel.
Similarly, Vance's view towards China is characterised by a hostile stance and a firm conviction that the Asian giant represents a threat to US interests, a position he shares with Donald Trump.
One of his most extreme stances is his suggestion that the U.S. military should shift its attention away from other conflicts and threats and toward China. He has also advocated for broad tariffs on Chinese imports and introduced legislation to restrict Chinese access to the U.S. financial system.
MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CONNECTIONS TO SILICON VALLEY
Vance's relationship with Silicon Valley heavyweight Peter Thiel sheds light on another important facet of the candidate: his connection to the tech sector. While he has presented himself as a critic of the tech giants, his close alliance with Thiel reveals a more nuanced stance.
This connection dates back to Vance’s work at Thiel’s global investment firm in 2017. Thiel subsequently donated $15 million to Vance’s campaign for Ohio Senate in 2022, helping him win the Republican primary and pick up the seat in the general election. Thiel’s net worth , valued at $7.9 billion, highlights his influence and power in the tech sector.
Thiel's endorsement was crucial to Vance's candidacy as it provided him with a significant financial advantage. A CBS News article adds:
"It's not entirely clear what Thiel might have wanted in return for his largesse. Thiel declined to comment for this article. Thiel's philosophy has been described as "techno-libertarian," but critics say it tends toward authoritarianism and even fascism. (He wrote in a libertarian magazine article in 2009: "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.")
"Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies and an early investor in Facebook, also has business interests with the U.S. government, which may be especially important at a time when the tech sector is under intense scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans."
With all these characteristics in mind, it is clear that Vance emerges as a singular figure in current American politics. Even with elements of his pro-Israel and anti-China stance, he still distinguishes himself as a character who challenges established Republican convention.
Vance manages to connect meaningfully with the emotions and frustrations of a sector of the American population that feels excluded and neglected by the elites. His ability to reflect the anxieties of the marginalized white working class makes him a key player in the Make America Great Again narrative that Donald Trump seeks to revitalize to secure a second presidency.
For all these reasons, which show closeness and harmony on structural issues of domestic and foreign policy but, above all, after the attack suffered last Saturday, July 13, the tycoon and presidential candidate ended up choosing JD Vance as his vice presidential running mate, a young politician not linked to the traditional sectors of Republican politics and a good prospect to inherit the Make America Great Again movement, of which Trump is the creator.
https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/qu ... l-de-trump
Google Translator
*******
(The following excerpt from a new Trumpist screed by Simpliticus who oughta stick to military analysis.)
But even if the latest developments have ensured that Trump should win the election, his near-assassination has taught us one very important lesson: that the Right will not “revolt” or wage some kind of dramatic, Hollywood-style civil war any time soon, even if further aggravations of a terminal sort occur, such as the total theft of the election later this year.
Many on the Right now brag that not a single fire was lit, nor a soul harmed in the wake of an open hit attempt on their candidate. However, some still cling to fantasies that were the shooter successful, an explosive civil war would have kicked off. But given the total normalcy and calm even in the face of near-disaster, it’s become evident that the majority of normal Americans will not “rise up” any time soon. Whether it’s a level of first world comfort that has yet to be totally eroded, or mass propagandizing, or the simple decades of docility imposed upon them by the establishment—it’s hard to know for sure. But it’s clear no one is going to “rise up” in the way some have imagined any time soon.
It has led me to contemplate what a potential civil war could actually look like if it did kick off, and what I’ve concluded is that it would have to be at the behest of strong State governments initiating some major anti-federal actions. Texas, for instance, could begin some of the anti-fed moves Governor Abbott promised long ago, leading to the call up of citizens into the National Guard or even declaring the call up of various state militias. Most people don’t know that the National Guard is actually State controlled, with the governor as its commander-in-chief. It only becomes ‘Federalized’ under an express order from the President for a specific Federal mission, which in such dire circumstances could be ignored by the State, thus spurring a conflict. Ron Desantis, in fact, has already threatened to do this, among other things.
This is what a real “civil war” would actually look like—not spontaneous Republicans armed with shotguns storming the streets when their candidate gets robbed for the second time in the election. However, if such a hypothetical State-led effort were to kick off, then it could spur more spontaneous citizens’ movements on the ground.
I mention all this because we began the article with the idea that we’re now living in a time of normalcy bias, where all the earlier ‘inconceivable’ scenarios are slowly coming to pass. As such, we can no longer totally dismiss the possibility that anything can happen during the forthcoming election, as the situation has now become more charged than ever.
(More at link...not recommended)
https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/can ... pportunity
Like I've said before:
The 2020 election was not stolen. Get over it.
The 2000 election was stolen, in broad daylight.
The 2016 election would have been stolen if the gatekeepers had not been asleep at the wheel in their hubris.
I find it hard to believe that the spooks would entrust such an important operation to a patsy without having a ringer on hand to ensure the job. Perhaps I give them too much credit...Would the Dems take it upon themselves? The incompetence gives credence...
So, despite a couple of years of me saying Trump would be prevented from re-assuming the purple it's looking pretty inevitable at the moment. Thus as we see in today's Dem installment the bourgeoise rats are fleeing the ship hoping to ingratiate themselves with the new Nero.
Short of doing a 'Hugo Chavez'(induced acute cancer) or some subtle poison on the Orange Man I can't see what they could do and get away with it. But they are probably desperate as Trump has promised to clean their houses.
We are screwed either way and I guess we deserve it for allowing things to reach this point because the scraps from the rich's feast of human and environmental carnage were enough to keep us complacent. Mebbe this will teach us...
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
Trump makes more false promises to the working class
Former president Trump’s first speech following the attempted assassination against him was an appeal to workers from a pro-boss candidate
July 19, 2024 by Natalia Marques, Zoe Alexandra
Donald Trump enters the stage on the last day of the Republican National Convention (Screenshot via CBS News)
Former President Donald Trump, now officially the nominee from the Republican Party for the 2024 Presidential elections, gave an address to the Republican National Convention on its last night, on July 18.
His address was riddled with appeals to workers in the US, who are experiencing deep economic despair under the Biden administration (as they were during previous administrations). According to the US Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey, the vast majority (67%) of the over 220 million survey respondents claim to have difficulty paying for usual household expenses within the last seven days—no surprise, as grocery prices have risen nearly 27% since 2020.
Eugene Puryear, journalist with BreakThrough News and political analyst, said that the Republican appeal to workers is telling of the overall political climate in the country. “We see Biden and the Democratic Party talking about ‘working class, working class, working class,’ Trump, JD Vance, and the Republicans also talking about ‘working class, working class, working class,’ when clearly neither of these parties cares at all about the working class,” he stated. “If these two capitalist parties, who have access to the most extensive polling data, think that they have to appeal to the working class, as a class, in their campaign, even if it’s a fraudulent appeal, it confirms class consciousness is growing in the United States. As can be seen from the growing popularity of trade unions and socialism.”
However, the appeal to working people by the Republicans, is one that recognizes their hardship but does not present solutions that would in any way threaten their class interests. As showcased by Donald Trump at the convention, their approach is to misinform, misrepresent, look for scapegoats, and beat the drums of nationalist chauvinism.
Made in the USA
“We will not let countries come in, take our jobs, and plunder our nation. They come and do that. They plunder our nation,” Trump said. “The way they will sell their product in America is to build it in America, very simple. Build it in America and only in America… If you go back 20, 25 years they’ve stolen, going to China and Mexico, about 68% of our auto industry. Manufacturing jobs. We’re going to get them all back. We’re going to get them all back, every single one of them.”
Trump promises to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US through tariffs and reversing government regulations.
In swearing his commitment to “bringing manufacturing back to the US”, Trump targeted prominent union leader Shawn Fain, the president of the United Auto Workers. Trump essentially blames Fain for having “allowing” auto manufacturing jobs to move to Mexico.
“And right now as we speak, large factories, just started, are being built across the border in Mexico,” said Trump. “So, with all the other things happening at our border, and they’re being built by China to make cars and to sell them into our country, no tax, no anything. The United Auto Workers ought to be ashamed for allowing this to happen and the leader of the United Auto Workers should be fired immediately and every single autoworker, union and nonunion, should be voting for Donald Trump because we’re going to bring back car manufacturing and we’re going to bring it back fast.”
This attack on Fain may be based on his left-leaning political position rather than a supposed “defense of workers”.
The reason why manufacturing plants have largely moved to the Global South is clearly not because of strong union leaders, but because of corporate greed, and the increase in surplus value that capitalists can extract from cheaper labor in the Global South, ie globalization, a process which has been the driving force in the global economy for the last several decades. A central demand of the successful UAW strike last year in the “Big Three” auto manufacturers, Stellantis, Ford, and General Motors, was in fact to reopen factories that had been closed down due to offshoring and globalization.
Wealth transfers to the rich
During his speech, Trump proudly touted his legacy of tax cuts for the wealthy and slashing pro-worker regulations. “The biggest tax cuts ever. The biggest regulation cuts ever… We did so much. We do so much,” he said.
Trump has already been president once, and as he proudly articulated, his record proves that his true loyalty lies with the ultra-rich, not with the working class. In 2017, Trump launched tax cuts for the rich that initiated one of the largest transfers of wealth from workers to the wealthy in US history—effectively a wealth transfer of USD 2 trillion. How did he manage this? Trump slashed the corporate tax rate from 36% to 21%, and lowered the income tax rate from those in the highest bracket from 39.6% to 37%, and exempted people with up to USD 12 million from paying any taxes on the inheritance left to loved ones.
He indicated that he would go even further during his second term. “We’ll start paying off debt and start lowering taxes even further. We gave you the largest tax cut. We’ll do it more,” he promised.
Sacrificing workers and the planet, for profit
During his speech, Trump declared that he would address the cost of living crisis and soaring cost of energy by encouraging exploitation of the natural resources in the United States. “We will drill, baby, drill,” Trump said to the convention hall.
“By slashing energy costs, we will in turn reduce the cost of transportation, manufacturing and all household goods. So much starts with energy. And remember, we have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far. We are a nation that has the opportunity to make an absolute fortune with its energy. We have it and China doesn’t.”
It is not new for Republican candidates to promise jobs and benefits for workers in exchange for striking down environmental regulations and violating Indigenous land rights, over uninhibited extraction of gas and oil in the United States. Trump in his 2016 campaign had triumphantly declared, “We’re preparing bold action to lift the restrictions on American energy…and we’re going to put our miners back to work.”
The Republican Party platform for 2024 states: “Under President Trump, the US became the Number One Producer of Oil and Natural Gas in the World — and we will soon be again by lifting restrictions on American Energy Production and terminating the Socialist Green New Deal.”
But is the drive to extract the earth’s resources necessarily compatible with protecting workers and jobs?
Already Congressional Republicans moved to block the enforcement of life-saving health regulations for coal miners.
If Trump and the Republican Party implement their drastic program, not only will the planet suffer—so will workers, who conservatives have historically left with the least protections possible. Trump implemented a variety of policies that undermined federal safety regulations, including slashing the amount of Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) inspectors.
Trump enables tip stealing
Trump also made a big deal about the Republican Party’s proposal of eliminating taxes on tips, telling a confusing anecdote about a waitress he spoke to about the need for this policy. Trump seemed in disbelief that he had a meaningful political conversation with his waitress. “You know, most people who go out, they hire consultants. They pay them [millions] of dollars… I got my information from a very smart waitress. That’s better than spending millions of dollars.”
The Republican Party’s platform states regarding “no tax on tips”, “we will eliminate Taxes on Tips for millions of Restaurant and Hospitality Workers, and pursue additional Tax Cuts.”
How much good can “no tax on tips” do in an administration (Trump’s) which implemented a “tip stealing rule,” which made it easier for employers to pocket up to USD 5.8 billion worth of workers’ tips? Or which opposed any increase to the federal minimum wage?
So-called border “invasion” rhetoric divides working class
Trump spent most of his speech harping on policies that divide workers from one another, including a very fine line between recent immigrants, specifically from Venezuela and El Salvador, versus the rest of the working class. Trump and the Republicans have promised to carry out the largest mass deportation the country has ever seen. “We also have an illegal immigration crisis, and it’s taking place right now, as we sit here in this beautiful arena. It’s a massive invasion at our southern border that has spread misery, crime, poverty, disease, and destruction to communities all across our land. Nobody’s ever seen anything like it.”
In an economy ruled by the corporate elite, are migrant workers the true enemies of US-born workers? Economists cite migrant workers as a key reason for job growth despite the Federal Reserve’s aggressive raising of interest rates.
“There’s been something of a mystery—how are we continuing to get such extraordinary strong job growth with inflation still continuing to come down?’’ Heidi Shierholz, president of the Economic Policy Institute and a former chief economist at the Labor Department, told PBS. “The immigration numbers being higher than what we had thought—that really does pretty much solve that puzzle.’’
The policies that are set to come from a second Trump term can only hurt working people. As labor journalist Alexandra Bradbury writes in Labor Notes, “In case there’s any doubt: billionaire Trump, who as an employer has fought unions and stiffed workers, and as a TV personality made ‘You’re fired’ his catchphrase, is not for the little guy.”
While workers in the US are increasingly feeling discouraged by what both the Republican and Democratic parties have to offer, many people are instead turning to alternative options. Claudia De La Cruz and Karina Garcia, are running on the ticket of the Party for Socialism and Liberation on an explicitly socialist platform, and Dr. Jill Stein, running with the Green Party and Dr. Cornel West, running as an independent, are running on progressive platforms. Either way, most working class formations are gearing up for a strong fight back to the next presidential administration and their plans to shred the rights of the people.
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/07/19/ ... ing-class/
******
Could Trump’s election end NATO’s proxy war in Ukraine against Russia?
July 19, 2024
A comprehensive solution to ending U.S. aggression and militarism is not a change of personnel at the White House.
The presidential nomination of Donald Trump and Senator JD Vance as his running mate raises the prospect of a peaceful settlement to the conflict in Ukraine. Both have been vociferous critics of the NATO proxy war and the arming of the Kiev regime. Vance has even proposed a peace settlement that is close to Moscow’s demands.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is recently pushing peace diplomacy, has voiced optimism that the omens are good for a settlement later this year to the worst war in Europe since the Second World War – if Trump and Vance are elected.
Only days after Donald Trump narrowly survived an assassination attempt, he was officially nominated as the Republican presidential candidate amid ecstatic scenes at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
After the tumult and drama over the last week – a long time in politics, as the saying goes – the Trump election campaign is in the driving seat. His vice presidential running mate is 39 years of age and gives the Republican Party a youthful zest. Both men are very much singing from the same hymn sheet regarding their “Make America Great Again” vision.
Trump has united the GOP under his leadership. All former party rivals lined up this week in Milwaukee to endorse the former real estate magnate in his bid to seek re-election to the White House in November. That helps to solidify his manifesto, which bodes well for diplomacy in Ukraine.
By contrast, the election campaign of Democrat incumbent President Joe Biden has run into a ditch. This week he was self-isolating in Delaware having reportedly incurred a third-time Covid infection. Biden increasingly looks toast. His apparent mental decline – the latest gaffe this week was not remembering the name of his Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, referring to him haltingly as “a black man” – has provoked a crisis in the Democratic Party and the largely favorable U.S. corporate news media. Senior figures including former President Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are reportedly urging Biden to stand down and pass the torch to a younger candidate. Panic is in the air.
There are reports that Biden may throw in the towel within the next few days as the Democrats head into their National Convention to officially nominate their presidential candidate. The trouble for the Democrats is they do not have a viable alternative candidate at this late stage in the campaign – with less than four months to election day on November 7.
That means there is now a serious chance that Trump could return to the White House after he lost the election in 2020, which MAGA loyalists hotly disputed as “stolen”.
That election outcome turns attention to one issue in particular: the war in Ukraine. The conflict erupted in February 2022 and has cost the lives of over 500,000 Ukrainian soldiers. Under the Biden administration and aligned European NATO members, there is no sign of the war coming to an end. Biden and European allies have pledged to keep sending weapons to Ukraine and tens of billions of dollars to prop up a hopelessly corrupt NeoNazi regime in Kiev.
Trump and Vance have pitched a diametrically opposite policy on the U.S.-led NATO proxy war in Ukraine.
That stance is causing the Deep State and its military-industrial complex acute anxiety. The Ukraine war racket has been a bonanza that vested interests in the U.S. ruling class do not want to end. That tension provides a plausible explanation for the attempted assassination of Trump during an open-air rally at Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. Salient questions remain about how the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old student, gained access to such a high-security position to fire his rifle at Trump.
The Republican candidates have warned that the Ukraine conflict is in danger of spiraling into a nuclear world war. Trump has said that he would end the war immediately by cutting off the military aid spigot and forcing the Kiev regime to begin negotiations with Russia.
Tantalizingly, JD Vance (R-Ohio) has been even more explicit in proposing that the warring parties should accept the territorial gains made by Russia – including Crimea, Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson provinces – and that Ukraine must accept Moscow’s demand that it remain neutral and outside of the NATO alliance.
Such a position is a breath of fresh air for its rationality. Many respected American scholars and diplomats have also recommended this historically coherent position as a solution, including Professors John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs. At least Trump and Vance seem to be cognizant of this reality, unlike the Biden administration and the rest of the Democrat Party, along with the Western media establishment and European minions who insanely push a fraudulent war to the last Ukrainian.
Moreover, polls show that the majority of American citizens (and Europeans) would prefer to see a diplomatic solution to the worst war in Europe since 1945.
Hungary’s Orban has admirably advocated peaceful diplomacy and for his troubles, his government has been sanctioned by the European Union establishment. Slovakia’s Robert Fico has also called for an end to the war in Ukraine, which many believe led to an assassination attempt on his life in May.
The conflict in Ukraine is a senseless, bloody slaughter that should never have escalated if Russia’s peace proposals in December 2021 had been accepted instead of dismissed out of hand by the Biden administration and its NATO lackeys in Europe. Also, a peace deal was possible in April 2022 but again was scuppered by malicious U.S. and British intervention.
If an American presidential candidate is proposing a diplomatic end to the conflict then that should be welcomed. It seems that common sense is prevailing.
Having said that, however, there are caveats. The Trump-Vance rhetoric could be empty pre-election canvassing for votes.
Trump’s record is one of hyping expectations and not delivering. When he ran for the presidency in 2016, he promised to normalize relations with Russia – and did not deliver.
He also boasted about solving the conflict in the Middle East with a “deal of the century” – only to embolden Israeli aggression towards Palestinians and Iran.
A reality check is strongly advised on what Trump and Vance can achieve.
While both men express skepticism about “endless wars” and NATO, it should be borne in mind that the conflicts the U.S. empire is fueling have a systematic cause. The United States is desperately fighting to maintain its failing hegemony against the rise of a multipolar and more democratic global order.
Washington and its European vassals are unleashing wars as a matter of necessity for preserving their erstwhile global dominance. History teaches that wars are always the refuge of the Western imperialist ruling classes.
It is notable that while Trump and Vance talk about ending conflict in Ukraine, they are at the same time talking belligerently about confronting China and Iran.
Trump and the MAGA Republicans are deprecated by the U.S. establishment as being “isolationists” in their vision of pursuing “America First”.
But the notion of “isolationalism” is an oxymoron when one considers the objective reality of U.S. imperialism. Foreign wars are an insatiable appetite for Western dominance.
American relations with the rest of the world are all about power projection, dominance and ultimately using violence to assert its “might is right” presumed national privileges. That applies whether the incumbent in the White House is a Democrat or Republican.
Trump may sound more reasonable on the issue of conflict in Ukraine with Russia. That alone makes him a more plausible candidate compared with the reckless warmongering of Biden and the Democrat-Deep State nexus.
The war in Ukraine must be stopped as soon as possible and a more reasonable security arrangement for Europe must be negotiated as Russia has long been consistently advocating.
Any diplomatic opening towards achieving peace and ending the killing must be welcomed.
Trump and Vance might just deliver on ending the hostilities in Ukraine which in itself would be a huge step forward away from the abyss of all-out war with Russia. On that score alone, their election might bring about an improvement.
But alas there is a contradiction. Don’t expect world peace to break out in other parts of the globe, because U.S. imperialism is cranking up its war machine. Trump and Vance are hawkish in their policy towards China and Iran.
A comprehensive solution to ending U.S. aggression and militarism is not a change of personnel at the White House. A profound, systematic change in American politics and economics is required.
Is partial peace sufficient? Maybe it is for now.
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... st-russia/
We Americans, probably more than any other people on this planet, have been inundated with every means of propaganda, public relations, advertising, on every kind of 'screen', in K-12 schooling, in what passes through the corporate filter as 'news'. We are conditioned to believe, however nonsensical. It's good for business and a good nights sleep for the rich.
The non-stop torrent of lies spewed by Trump and Biden would be believed by none otherwise.
Trump is clearly out of his depth on Ukraine(and most else...). His self-delusional negotiating skills are worthless in dealing with a Russia which has learned the hard way the the US cannot be trusted to uphold any agreement.
Instead of going through that torturous learning process they could have just asked the Native Americans.
Former president Trump’s first speech following the attempted assassination against him was an appeal to workers from a pro-boss candidate
July 19, 2024 by Natalia Marques, Zoe Alexandra
Donald Trump enters the stage on the last day of the Republican National Convention (Screenshot via CBS News)
Former President Donald Trump, now officially the nominee from the Republican Party for the 2024 Presidential elections, gave an address to the Republican National Convention on its last night, on July 18.
His address was riddled with appeals to workers in the US, who are experiencing deep economic despair under the Biden administration (as they were during previous administrations). According to the US Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey, the vast majority (67%) of the over 220 million survey respondents claim to have difficulty paying for usual household expenses within the last seven days—no surprise, as grocery prices have risen nearly 27% since 2020.
Eugene Puryear, journalist with BreakThrough News and political analyst, said that the Republican appeal to workers is telling of the overall political climate in the country. “We see Biden and the Democratic Party talking about ‘working class, working class, working class,’ Trump, JD Vance, and the Republicans also talking about ‘working class, working class, working class,’ when clearly neither of these parties cares at all about the working class,” he stated. “If these two capitalist parties, who have access to the most extensive polling data, think that they have to appeal to the working class, as a class, in their campaign, even if it’s a fraudulent appeal, it confirms class consciousness is growing in the United States. As can be seen from the growing popularity of trade unions and socialism.”
However, the appeal to working people by the Republicans, is one that recognizes their hardship but does not present solutions that would in any way threaten their class interests. As showcased by Donald Trump at the convention, their approach is to misinform, misrepresent, look for scapegoats, and beat the drums of nationalist chauvinism.
Made in the USA
“We will not let countries come in, take our jobs, and plunder our nation. They come and do that. They plunder our nation,” Trump said. “The way they will sell their product in America is to build it in America, very simple. Build it in America and only in America… If you go back 20, 25 years they’ve stolen, going to China and Mexico, about 68% of our auto industry. Manufacturing jobs. We’re going to get them all back. We’re going to get them all back, every single one of them.”
Trump promises to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US through tariffs and reversing government regulations.
In swearing his commitment to “bringing manufacturing back to the US”, Trump targeted prominent union leader Shawn Fain, the president of the United Auto Workers. Trump essentially blames Fain for having “allowing” auto manufacturing jobs to move to Mexico.
“And right now as we speak, large factories, just started, are being built across the border in Mexico,” said Trump. “So, with all the other things happening at our border, and they’re being built by China to make cars and to sell them into our country, no tax, no anything. The United Auto Workers ought to be ashamed for allowing this to happen and the leader of the United Auto Workers should be fired immediately and every single autoworker, union and nonunion, should be voting for Donald Trump because we’re going to bring back car manufacturing and we’re going to bring it back fast.”
This attack on Fain may be based on his left-leaning political position rather than a supposed “defense of workers”.
The reason why manufacturing plants have largely moved to the Global South is clearly not because of strong union leaders, but because of corporate greed, and the increase in surplus value that capitalists can extract from cheaper labor in the Global South, ie globalization, a process which has been the driving force in the global economy for the last several decades. A central demand of the successful UAW strike last year in the “Big Three” auto manufacturers, Stellantis, Ford, and General Motors, was in fact to reopen factories that had been closed down due to offshoring and globalization.
Wealth transfers to the rich
During his speech, Trump proudly touted his legacy of tax cuts for the wealthy and slashing pro-worker regulations. “The biggest tax cuts ever. The biggest regulation cuts ever… We did so much. We do so much,” he said.
Trump has already been president once, and as he proudly articulated, his record proves that his true loyalty lies with the ultra-rich, not with the working class. In 2017, Trump launched tax cuts for the rich that initiated one of the largest transfers of wealth from workers to the wealthy in US history—effectively a wealth transfer of USD 2 trillion. How did he manage this? Trump slashed the corporate tax rate from 36% to 21%, and lowered the income tax rate from those in the highest bracket from 39.6% to 37%, and exempted people with up to USD 12 million from paying any taxes on the inheritance left to loved ones.
He indicated that he would go even further during his second term. “We’ll start paying off debt and start lowering taxes even further. We gave you the largest tax cut. We’ll do it more,” he promised.
Sacrificing workers and the planet, for profit
During his speech, Trump declared that he would address the cost of living crisis and soaring cost of energy by encouraging exploitation of the natural resources in the United States. “We will drill, baby, drill,” Trump said to the convention hall.
“By slashing energy costs, we will in turn reduce the cost of transportation, manufacturing and all household goods. So much starts with energy. And remember, we have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far. We are a nation that has the opportunity to make an absolute fortune with its energy. We have it and China doesn’t.”
It is not new for Republican candidates to promise jobs and benefits for workers in exchange for striking down environmental regulations and violating Indigenous land rights, over uninhibited extraction of gas and oil in the United States. Trump in his 2016 campaign had triumphantly declared, “We’re preparing bold action to lift the restrictions on American energy…and we’re going to put our miners back to work.”
The Republican Party platform for 2024 states: “Under President Trump, the US became the Number One Producer of Oil and Natural Gas in the World — and we will soon be again by lifting restrictions on American Energy Production and terminating the Socialist Green New Deal.”
But is the drive to extract the earth’s resources necessarily compatible with protecting workers and jobs?
Already Congressional Republicans moved to block the enforcement of life-saving health regulations for coal miners.
If Trump and the Republican Party implement their drastic program, not only will the planet suffer—so will workers, who conservatives have historically left with the least protections possible. Trump implemented a variety of policies that undermined federal safety regulations, including slashing the amount of Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) inspectors.
Trump enables tip stealing
Trump also made a big deal about the Republican Party’s proposal of eliminating taxes on tips, telling a confusing anecdote about a waitress he spoke to about the need for this policy. Trump seemed in disbelief that he had a meaningful political conversation with his waitress. “You know, most people who go out, they hire consultants. They pay them [millions] of dollars… I got my information from a very smart waitress. That’s better than spending millions of dollars.”
The Republican Party’s platform states regarding “no tax on tips”, “we will eliminate Taxes on Tips for millions of Restaurant and Hospitality Workers, and pursue additional Tax Cuts.”
How much good can “no tax on tips” do in an administration (Trump’s) which implemented a “tip stealing rule,” which made it easier for employers to pocket up to USD 5.8 billion worth of workers’ tips? Or which opposed any increase to the federal minimum wage?
So-called border “invasion” rhetoric divides working class
Trump spent most of his speech harping on policies that divide workers from one another, including a very fine line between recent immigrants, specifically from Venezuela and El Salvador, versus the rest of the working class. Trump and the Republicans have promised to carry out the largest mass deportation the country has ever seen. “We also have an illegal immigration crisis, and it’s taking place right now, as we sit here in this beautiful arena. It’s a massive invasion at our southern border that has spread misery, crime, poverty, disease, and destruction to communities all across our land. Nobody’s ever seen anything like it.”
In an economy ruled by the corporate elite, are migrant workers the true enemies of US-born workers? Economists cite migrant workers as a key reason for job growth despite the Federal Reserve’s aggressive raising of interest rates.
“There’s been something of a mystery—how are we continuing to get such extraordinary strong job growth with inflation still continuing to come down?’’ Heidi Shierholz, president of the Economic Policy Institute and a former chief economist at the Labor Department, told PBS. “The immigration numbers being higher than what we had thought—that really does pretty much solve that puzzle.’’
The policies that are set to come from a second Trump term can only hurt working people. As labor journalist Alexandra Bradbury writes in Labor Notes, “In case there’s any doubt: billionaire Trump, who as an employer has fought unions and stiffed workers, and as a TV personality made ‘You’re fired’ his catchphrase, is not for the little guy.”
While workers in the US are increasingly feeling discouraged by what both the Republican and Democratic parties have to offer, many people are instead turning to alternative options. Claudia De La Cruz and Karina Garcia, are running on the ticket of the Party for Socialism and Liberation on an explicitly socialist platform, and Dr. Jill Stein, running with the Green Party and Dr. Cornel West, running as an independent, are running on progressive platforms. Either way, most working class formations are gearing up for a strong fight back to the next presidential administration and their plans to shred the rights of the people.
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/07/19/ ... ing-class/
******
Could Trump’s election end NATO’s proxy war in Ukraine against Russia?
July 19, 2024
A comprehensive solution to ending U.S. aggression and militarism is not a change of personnel at the White House.
The presidential nomination of Donald Trump and Senator JD Vance as his running mate raises the prospect of a peaceful settlement to the conflict in Ukraine. Both have been vociferous critics of the NATO proxy war and the arming of the Kiev regime. Vance has even proposed a peace settlement that is close to Moscow’s demands.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who is recently pushing peace diplomacy, has voiced optimism that the omens are good for a settlement later this year to the worst war in Europe since the Second World War – if Trump and Vance are elected.
Only days after Donald Trump narrowly survived an assassination attempt, he was officially nominated as the Republican presidential candidate amid ecstatic scenes at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
After the tumult and drama over the last week – a long time in politics, as the saying goes – the Trump election campaign is in the driving seat. His vice presidential running mate is 39 years of age and gives the Republican Party a youthful zest. Both men are very much singing from the same hymn sheet regarding their “Make America Great Again” vision.
Trump has united the GOP under his leadership. All former party rivals lined up this week in Milwaukee to endorse the former real estate magnate in his bid to seek re-election to the White House in November. That helps to solidify his manifesto, which bodes well for diplomacy in Ukraine.
By contrast, the election campaign of Democrat incumbent President Joe Biden has run into a ditch. This week he was self-isolating in Delaware having reportedly incurred a third-time Covid infection. Biden increasingly looks toast. His apparent mental decline – the latest gaffe this week was not remembering the name of his Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, referring to him haltingly as “a black man” – has provoked a crisis in the Democratic Party and the largely favorable U.S. corporate news media. Senior figures including former President Barack Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, are reportedly urging Biden to stand down and pass the torch to a younger candidate. Panic is in the air.
There are reports that Biden may throw in the towel within the next few days as the Democrats head into their National Convention to officially nominate their presidential candidate. The trouble for the Democrats is they do not have a viable alternative candidate at this late stage in the campaign – with less than four months to election day on November 7.
That means there is now a serious chance that Trump could return to the White House after he lost the election in 2020, which MAGA loyalists hotly disputed as “stolen”.
That election outcome turns attention to one issue in particular: the war in Ukraine. The conflict erupted in February 2022 and has cost the lives of over 500,000 Ukrainian soldiers. Under the Biden administration and aligned European NATO members, there is no sign of the war coming to an end. Biden and European allies have pledged to keep sending weapons to Ukraine and tens of billions of dollars to prop up a hopelessly corrupt NeoNazi regime in Kiev.
Trump and Vance have pitched a diametrically opposite policy on the U.S.-led NATO proxy war in Ukraine.
That stance is causing the Deep State and its military-industrial complex acute anxiety. The Ukraine war racket has been a bonanza that vested interests in the U.S. ruling class do not want to end. That tension provides a plausible explanation for the attempted assassination of Trump during an open-air rally at Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. Salient questions remain about how the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old student, gained access to such a high-security position to fire his rifle at Trump.
The Republican candidates have warned that the Ukraine conflict is in danger of spiraling into a nuclear world war. Trump has said that he would end the war immediately by cutting off the military aid spigot and forcing the Kiev regime to begin negotiations with Russia.
Tantalizingly, JD Vance (R-Ohio) has been even more explicit in proposing that the warring parties should accept the territorial gains made by Russia – including Crimea, Donbass, Zaporozhye and Kherson provinces – and that Ukraine must accept Moscow’s demand that it remain neutral and outside of the NATO alliance.
Such a position is a breath of fresh air for its rationality. Many respected American scholars and diplomats have also recommended this historically coherent position as a solution, including Professors John Mearsheimer and Jeffrey Sachs. At least Trump and Vance seem to be cognizant of this reality, unlike the Biden administration and the rest of the Democrat Party, along with the Western media establishment and European minions who insanely push a fraudulent war to the last Ukrainian.
Moreover, polls show that the majority of American citizens (and Europeans) would prefer to see a diplomatic solution to the worst war in Europe since 1945.
Hungary’s Orban has admirably advocated peaceful diplomacy and for his troubles, his government has been sanctioned by the European Union establishment. Slovakia’s Robert Fico has also called for an end to the war in Ukraine, which many believe led to an assassination attempt on his life in May.
The conflict in Ukraine is a senseless, bloody slaughter that should never have escalated if Russia’s peace proposals in December 2021 had been accepted instead of dismissed out of hand by the Biden administration and its NATO lackeys in Europe. Also, a peace deal was possible in April 2022 but again was scuppered by malicious U.S. and British intervention.
If an American presidential candidate is proposing a diplomatic end to the conflict then that should be welcomed. It seems that common sense is prevailing.
Having said that, however, there are caveats. The Trump-Vance rhetoric could be empty pre-election canvassing for votes.
Trump’s record is one of hyping expectations and not delivering. When he ran for the presidency in 2016, he promised to normalize relations with Russia – and did not deliver.
He also boasted about solving the conflict in the Middle East with a “deal of the century” – only to embolden Israeli aggression towards Palestinians and Iran.
A reality check is strongly advised on what Trump and Vance can achieve.
While both men express skepticism about “endless wars” and NATO, it should be borne in mind that the conflicts the U.S. empire is fueling have a systematic cause. The United States is desperately fighting to maintain its failing hegemony against the rise of a multipolar and more democratic global order.
Washington and its European vassals are unleashing wars as a matter of necessity for preserving their erstwhile global dominance. History teaches that wars are always the refuge of the Western imperialist ruling classes.
It is notable that while Trump and Vance talk about ending conflict in Ukraine, they are at the same time talking belligerently about confronting China and Iran.
Trump and the MAGA Republicans are deprecated by the U.S. establishment as being “isolationists” in their vision of pursuing “America First”.
But the notion of “isolationalism” is an oxymoron when one considers the objective reality of U.S. imperialism. Foreign wars are an insatiable appetite for Western dominance.
American relations with the rest of the world are all about power projection, dominance and ultimately using violence to assert its “might is right” presumed national privileges. That applies whether the incumbent in the White House is a Democrat or Republican.
Trump may sound more reasonable on the issue of conflict in Ukraine with Russia. That alone makes him a more plausible candidate compared with the reckless warmongering of Biden and the Democrat-Deep State nexus.
The war in Ukraine must be stopped as soon as possible and a more reasonable security arrangement for Europe must be negotiated as Russia has long been consistently advocating.
Any diplomatic opening towards achieving peace and ending the killing must be welcomed.
Trump and Vance might just deliver on ending the hostilities in Ukraine which in itself would be a huge step forward away from the abyss of all-out war with Russia. On that score alone, their election might bring about an improvement.
But alas there is a contradiction. Don’t expect world peace to break out in other parts of the globe, because U.S. imperialism is cranking up its war machine. Trump and Vance are hawkish in their policy towards China and Iran.
A comprehensive solution to ending U.S. aggression and militarism is not a change of personnel at the White House. A profound, systematic change in American politics and economics is required.
Is partial peace sufficient? Maybe it is for now.
https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... st-russia/
We Americans, probably more than any other people on this planet, have been inundated with every means of propaganda, public relations, advertising, on every kind of 'screen', in K-12 schooling, in what passes through the corporate filter as 'news'. We are conditioned to believe, however nonsensical. It's good for business and a good nights sleep for the rich.
The non-stop torrent of lies spewed by Trump and Biden would be believed by none otherwise.
Trump is clearly out of his depth on Ukraine(and most else...). His self-delusional negotiating skills are worthless in dealing with a Russia which has learned the hard way the the US cannot be trusted to uphold any agreement.
Instead of going through that torturous learning process they could have just asked the Native Americans.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
Trump’s Acceptance Speech at the Republican National Convention
Posted on July 22, 2024 by Lambert Strether
By Lambert Strether of Corrente.
Vinnie Daniel: How come you don’t hate this guy? He is everything you taught us not to trust. Mark Baum: I can’t hate him. He is so transparent in his self interest that I kind of respect him.— The Big Short
Readers, I apologize. Given the headline, you have every right to the expectation that I’m going to pull on my yellow waders and do a close reading of Trump’s acceptance speech before the Republican National Convention. Unfortunately, Biden’s defenestration blotted out the sun — and sucked up all my time — and so I’ve had to scale back my ambitions. I’m sure I’ll have a chance to take up these themes again!
In this scaled back version, I will first look at “word clouds” for three of Trump’s speeches, showing consistent themes, but also differences. Then, I will consider the question of whether Trump might morph from a “Heel” to a “Face.” Finally, I will quote and analyze, in a cursory fashion, Trump on his own attempted assassination, and Trump’s appeal to the working class. I’ll conclude with a few brief remarks on the Trump and Biden Administrations. (Topics from Trump’s speech that I will not cover include war, energy, inflation, and the border, although these comprised the great bulk of the speech’s bulky verbiage.)
Trump: “People” and “Country”
Here are three world clouds (all made with WordCloud+): Trump in Bangor, Trump in Vegas, and Trump at the RNC:
Figure 1: 2016 (Bangor Cross Arena)
Figure 2: 2024 (Vegas)
Figure 3: 2024 (RNC Acceptance Speech)
As you can see, “people” and “country” — appropriately for a populist — have been Trump’s dominant themes for the last eight years, “our country,” or “this beautiful country” being a sort of counterpoint to the Democrat “our democracy.”
Of course, three speeches is a very small sample, and it would be fun to create a bigger one, but accepting that word counts can be said to be proxies for themes, here is a different look at the these world clouds data in tabular form:
In Bangor, after the top two, “people” and “country,” top themes were “jobs” and “trade,” appropriate to the state of Maine, but also (to the best of my recollection) themes of the entire campaign as well. In Vegas, again after “people” and “country,” we had a full-fledged Schmittian “friend/enemy” discourse (“they’re”/”we’re”) along the “border.” And at the RNC, “great” enters the top ranking, presumably because the “G” in MAGA stands for “Great.” But we also have “administration” — presumably to compare Trump’s to Biden’s — but also, and very strangely, “love” (of which more later). Let us now turn to Thomas Crooks’ attempt on Trump’s life:
Trump: The Assassination Attempt
In a remarkable year, one of the more remarkable events has been a Presidential candidate describing how it feels to almost be assassinated, and at his own nominating convention. I can’t think of an equivalent example[1]. Trump is not terse, so I’m going to edit this down seriously, eliminating the jazzy riffing and repetition, but hopefully you will get the flavor:
Let me begin this evening by expressing my gratitude to the American people for your outpouring of love and support following the assassination attempt at my rally on Saturday. As you already know, the assassin’s bullet came within a quarter of an inch of taking my life. So many people have asked me what happened. Tell us what happened. Please. And therefore, I will tell you exactly what happened, and you’ll never hear it from me a second time, because it’s actually too painful to tell.
Trump leads with this; I’ve spoken to people who watched it, and “remarkable” was also their word. “I will tell you exactly what happened” is so simple and direct. And we’ll see if he keeps his promise:
It was a warm, beautiful day in the early evening in Butler Township in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania….
I heard a loud whizzing sound and felt something hit me really, really hard on my right ear.
I said to myself, wow, what was that? It can only be a bullet and moved my right hand to my ear, brought it down. My hand was covered with blood….
Service agents rushed to the stage, and they really did. They rushed to the stage.
These are great people at great risk, I will tell you. And pounced on top of me so that I would be protected. There was blood pouring everywhere, and yet in a certain way I felt very safe because I had God on my side. I felt that.
“I felt that” is also simple and direct. More:
The most incredible aspect of what took place on that terrible evening in the fading sun [indeed, 6:11 p.m. ET] was actually seen later. In almost all cases, as you probably know, and when even a single bullet is fired, just a single bullet. And we had many bullets that were being fired, crowds run for the exits or stampede, but not in this case. It was very unusual.
It’s as if Trump lifts the crowd up, and shows it to itself in a mirror. More:
Nobody ran, and by not stampeding, many lives were saved. But that isn’t the reason that they didn’t move. The reason is that they knew I was in very serious trouble. They saw it. They saw me go down. They saw the blood and thought, actually, most did that I was dead. They knew it was a shot to the head. They saw the blood.[2]
We don’t actually know that people thought Trump was dead. But it’s certainly plausible. And now the part that will get some voters, at least, to walk over broken glass to get to the polls to vote for him:
I’m not supposed to be here tonight. Not supposed to be here… I stand before you in this arena only by the grace of Almighty God.
And watching the reports over the last few days, many people say it was a providential moment. Probably was.
And the “iconic” moment. Trump, with the Secret Service agents huddled over him, protecting him with their bodies, looks out and sees the crowd:
When I rose surrounded by secret service, the crowd was confused because they thought I was dead. And there was great, great sorrow. I could see that on their faces as I looked out.
They didn’t know I was looking out [i.e., their reactions were not fake, something Trump is probably not used to]. They thought it was over, but I could see it. I wanted to do something to let them know I was okay. I raised my right arm, looked at the thousands and thousands of people that were breathlessly waiting and started shouting, fight, fight, fight!
Once my clenched fist went up, and it was high into the air. You’ve all seen that. The crowd realized I was okay and roared with pride for our country like no crowd I have ever heard before.
I think “pride for our country” transitions back to a more normal campaign mode; but what an extraordinary narrative. I don’t ever want to hear a similar narrative from another politician, but it’s hard for me to imagine another politician carrying the crowd with him as Trump did, whether in Butler, PA, or Milwaukee, WI.
Trump: Heel or Face?
The “Heel” and “Face” dichotomy derives from the art of kayfabe in the world of professional wrestling, a world in which Trump has moved (and may still move)[3]. From WikiPedia:
In professional wrestling, kayfabe (/ˈkeɪfeɪb/) is the portrayal of staged events within the industry as “real” or “true”, specifically the portrayal of competition, rivalries, and relationships between participants as being genuine and not staged. The term kayfabe has evolved to also become a code word of sorts for maintaining this “reality” within the direct or indirect presence of the general public.
Very much like politics. In these staged events, wrestlers assume characters:
The characters assumed by wrestlers can be distinguished into two alignments: faces and heels.
Faces, short for “babyfaces”, are hero-type characters whose personalities are crafted to elicit the support of the audience through traits such as humility, patriotism, a hard-working nature, determination, and reciprocal love of the crowd. Faces usually win their matches on the basis of their technical skills and are sometimes portrayed as underdogs to enhance the story.
Heels are villainous or antagonistic characters, whose personalities are crafted to elicit a negative response from the audience. They often embrace traditionally negative traits such as narcissism, egomania, unprompted rage, sadism, and general bitterness.
Above, I drew attention to Trump’s use of the word “love”; new for him, at least for this tiny sample. Here are WordCloud+’s usage examples of “love” in Trump’s RNC accepance speech:
The centrality of love is something a Face would extol, especially the Ultimate Face, Jesus of Nazareth. And so Trump, misquoting John 15:13 (to good effect: “others” for “friends”): “There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for others.” Trump even gives a shout-out to Fred Trump, the worst father in the world, who “used to love taking me to see Billy Graham.” Of course, there is Hannibal Lector (“he’s love to have you for dinner”). However, most of the usage examples involve kayfabe’s “reciprocal love of the crowd” (“there’s great love in the room”). I myself wouldn’t classify that as love at all; it reminds me of the parasocial relations that K-Pop fans have with their favored artists (or, for that matter, Beatlemania). I’d be even more concerned if “love” interpreted in this latter sense turned into a binding force among “committed nationalist militants.”
Trump: The Working Class
Trump’s acceptance speech contains two passages of direct interest to the working class. The first is “tips,” typically framed as a narrative:
At the center of our plan for economic relief, our massive tax cuts for workers that include something else that stood out to be very popular, actually, here, it’s very popular in this building and all those hotels that I saw that are so nice. I’m staying in a nice one. It’s called no tax on tips, no tax on no tax on tips.
I got that by having dinner recently in Nevada, where we’re leading by about 14 points.
We’re having dinner at a beautiful restaurant in the Trump Building on the strip, and it’s a great building. And the waitress comes over. How’s everything going? Really nice person. How’s everything? Oh, Sarah. So tough. The government’s after me all the time on tips, tips, tips. I said, well, they give you a cash, would they be able to find me? She said, actually, they didn’t know that.
Here Trump plays both parts in a conversation, which he does quite a bit. More:
She said very little cash is given. It’s all put right on the check. And they come in and they take so much of our money, it’s just ridiculous. And they don’t believe anything we say and they’ve just tired, as you know, 88,000 agents to go after them. Even more.
And I said, this shows the level of, you know, most people go out, they hire consultants, they pay millions of dollars. But I said to her, let me just ask you a question. Would you be happy if you had no tax and tip? She said, what a great idea. I got my information from a very smart waitress. That’s better than spending millions of dollars.
And everybody, everybody loves it. Waitresses and caddies and drivers and everybody’s a large, large group of people that are being really hurt badly. They make money. Let them keep their money.
(I haven’t checked to see if there really is a “Sarah.”) Notice that Trump slams the PMC (“consultants”) and upholds the working class (“very smart waitress”). At a policy level, I’m not sure I want to encourage nobles throwing gold coins to the peasants as they pass by in their carriages any more than they already do, but there’s no denying that “more money in your pocket” has its own appeal.
And on globalization and unions:
And right now, as we speak, large factories just started are being built across the border in Mexico. So with all the other things happening on our border, and they’re being built by China to make cars and to sell them into our country. No tax, no anything. The United Auto Workers ought to be ashamed for allowing this to happen. And the leader of the United Auto Workers should be fired immediately. And every single auto worker union and non union should be voting for Donald Trump, because we’re going to bring back car manufacturing and we’re going to bring it back fast.
They’re building some of the largest auto plants anywhere in the world. Think of it, in the world. And we’re going to bring it back. We’re going to make them we don’t mind the we don’t mind that happening. But those plants are going to be built in the United States. And our people are going to man those plant.
And if they don’t agree with us, we’ll put a tariff of approximately 100 to 200% on each car, and they will be unsellable in the United States.
We still have to built our own plants here, of course. But nevertheless!
Conclusion
One recent talking point from Democrats has been that the Republicans geared their whole campaign around Biden’s age. There’s no sign of that in this speec. Trump remarks:
They will not have done the damage that Biden has done, only going to use the term once. Biden. I’m not going to use the name anymore. Just one time.
Biden, or rather whichever Biden staffer is, or possibly was, in charge of his account, reacted to Trump’s acceptance speech as follows:
I’m stuck at home with COVID, so I had the distinct misfortune of watching Donald Trump’s speech to the RNC.
What the hell was he talking about?
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) July 20, 2024
And I think “What the hell was he talking about?” is a fair reaction, especially if you’ve got West Wing brain and conceive of a Presidential as a well-crafted script of policy talking points and the occasional clever aphorism. I’m still struggling through breaking down Trump’s rhetoric, because quite frankly I’m a big fan of terse, especially in others, but it seems to me that what Trump is all about is the relationship to a crowd, an actual, visible, tangible crowd. There, Trump is in his element, and everything he says — jazzy riffing, digressions, verbal oddities, religiosity, and all — is designed to maintain that connection. Very much unlike all other politicians in the field today.
NOTES
[1] In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt was shot while giving a speech and, also remarkably, continued on speaking. But he didn’t describe the shooting in the speech, let alone an acceptance speech.
[2] I cut this part out for brevity: “And there’s an interesting statistic. The ears are the bloodiest part. If something happens with the ears, they bleed more than any other part of the body. For whatever reason. The doctors told me that. They said, why is there so much blood? He said, it’s the ears. They bleed more. So we learned something, but they just, they just, this beautiful crowd, they didn’t want to leave me. They knew I was in trouble. They didn’t want to leave me. And you can see that love written all over their faces.” “So we learned something.”
[3] Needless to say, “I don’t love Trump.” I’m looking at his work as an exercise in rhetoric. When I say “simple and direct,” for example, I’m not saying true; the most I might say is “plausible.” For all I know, to Trump the showman, the story of his assassination is genuine imitation kayfabe all the way down (I, for example, have been spoken to about mediating serious emotional events through literature, as opposed to direct and genuine feeling, whatever that may be).
[4] Interestingly, in kayfabe the crowd can also be a “pseudo-character”: “In the WWE Universe era, the crowd also can be spontaneously used, mostly as a Heel, either to distract promo, build more heat to heels, or used to distract referees on their count-outs to force a result, even when they have no physical power or rights to fight the wrestlers.” Trump, however, makes the crowd in Butler, PA a Face.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07 ... ntion.html.
There it is, that 'wrastling' I was talking about. It is about the level of political discourse we have. It was never all that great but has become cartoonish at the highest levels, this purposefully done by the purveyors of discourse who happily dwell in the Marvel Universe.
Posted on July 22, 2024 by Lambert Strether
By Lambert Strether of Corrente.
Vinnie Daniel: How come you don’t hate this guy? He is everything you taught us not to trust. Mark Baum: I can’t hate him. He is so transparent in his self interest that I kind of respect him.— The Big Short
Readers, I apologize. Given the headline, you have every right to the expectation that I’m going to pull on my yellow waders and do a close reading of Trump’s acceptance speech before the Republican National Convention. Unfortunately, Biden’s defenestration blotted out the sun — and sucked up all my time — and so I’ve had to scale back my ambitions. I’m sure I’ll have a chance to take up these themes again!
In this scaled back version, I will first look at “word clouds” for three of Trump’s speeches, showing consistent themes, but also differences. Then, I will consider the question of whether Trump might morph from a “Heel” to a “Face.” Finally, I will quote and analyze, in a cursory fashion, Trump on his own attempted assassination, and Trump’s appeal to the working class. I’ll conclude with a few brief remarks on the Trump and Biden Administrations. (Topics from Trump’s speech that I will not cover include war, energy, inflation, and the border, although these comprised the great bulk of the speech’s bulky verbiage.)
Trump: “People” and “Country”
Here are three world clouds (all made with WordCloud+): Trump in Bangor, Trump in Vegas, and Trump at the RNC:
Figure 1: 2016 (Bangor Cross Arena)
Figure 2: 2024 (Vegas)
Figure 3: 2024 (RNC Acceptance Speech)
As you can see, “people” and “country” — appropriately for a populist — have been Trump’s dominant themes for the last eight years, “our country,” or “this beautiful country” being a sort of counterpoint to the Democrat “our democracy.”
Of course, three speeches is a very small sample, and it would be fun to create a bigger one, but accepting that word counts can be said to be proxies for themes, here is a different look at the these world clouds data in tabular form:
In Bangor, after the top two, “people” and “country,” top themes were “jobs” and “trade,” appropriate to the state of Maine, but also (to the best of my recollection) themes of the entire campaign as well. In Vegas, again after “people” and “country,” we had a full-fledged Schmittian “friend/enemy” discourse (“they’re”/”we’re”) along the “border.” And at the RNC, “great” enters the top ranking, presumably because the “G” in MAGA stands for “Great.” But we also have “administration” — presumably to compare Trump’s to Biden’s — but also, and very strangely, “love” (of which more later). Let us now turn to Thomas Crooks’ attempt on Trump’s life:
Trump: The Assassination Attempt
In a remarkable year, one of the more remarkable events has been a Presidential candidate describing how it feels to almost be assassinated, and at his own nominating convention. I can’t think of an equivalent example[1]. Trump is not terse, so I’m going to edit this down seriously, eliminating the jazzy riffing and repetition, but hopefully you will get the flavor:
Let me begin this evening by expressing my gratitude to the American people for your outpouring of love and support following the assassination attempt at my rally on Saturday. As you already know, the assassin’s bullet came within a quarter of an inch of taking my life. So many people have asked me what happened. Tell us what happened. Please. And therefore, I will tell you exactly what happened, and you’ll never hear it from me a second time, because it’s actually too painful to tell.
Trump leads with this; I’ve spoken to people who watched it, and “remarkable” was also their word. “I will tell you exactly what happened” is so simple and direct. And we’ll see if he keeps his promise:
It was a warm, beautiful day in the early evening in Butler Township in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania….
I heard a loud whizzing sound and felt something hit me really, really hard on my right ear.
I said to myself, wow, what was that? It can only be a bullet and moved my right hand to my ear, brought it down. My hand was covered with blood….
Service agents rushed to the stage, and they really did. They rushed to the stage.
These are great people at great risk, I will tell you. And pounced on top of me so that I would be protected. There was blood pouring everywhere, and yet in a certain way I felt very safe because I had God on my side. I felt that.
“I felt that” is also simple and direct. More:
The most incredible aspect of what took place on that terrible evening in the fading sun [indeed, 6:11 p.m. ET] was actually seen later. In almost all cases, as you probably know, and when even a single bullet is fired, just a single bullet. And we had many bullets that were being fired, crowds run for the exits or stampede, but not in this case. It was very unusual.
It’s as if Trump lifts the crowd up, and shows it to itself in a mirror. More:
Nobody ran, and by not stampeding, many lives were saved. But that isn’t the reason that they didn’t move. The reason is that they knew I was in very serious trouble. They saw it. They saw me go down. They saw the blood and thought, actually, most did that I was dead. They knew it was a shot to the head. They saw the blood.[2]
We don’t actually know that people thought Trump was dead. But it’s certainly plausible. And now the part that will get some voters, at least, to walk over broken glass to get to the polls to vote for him:
I’m not supposed to be here tonight. Not supposed to be here… I stand before you in this arena only by the grace of Almighty God.
And watching the reports over the last few days, many people say it was a providential moment. Probably was.
And the “iconic” moment. Trump, with the Secret Service agents huddled over him, protecting him with their bodies, looks out and sees the crowd:
When I rose surrounded by secret service, the crowd was confused because they thought I was dead. And there was great, great sorrow. I could see that on their faces as I looked out.
They didn’t know I was looking out [i.e., their reactions were not fake, something Trump is probably not used to]. They thought it was over, but I could see it. I wanted to do something to let them know I was okay. I raised my right arm, looked at the thousands and thousands of people that were breathlessly waiting and started shouting, fight, fight, fight!
Once my clenched fist went up, and it was high into the air. You’ve all seen that. The crowd realized I was okay and roared with pride for our country like no crowd I have ever heard before.
I think “pride for our country” transitions back to a more normal campaign mode; but what an extraordinary narrative. I don’t ever want to hear a similar narrative from another politician, but it’s hard for me to imagine another politician carrying the crowd with him as Trump did, whether in Butler, PA, or Milwaukee, WI.
Trump: Heel or Face?
The “Heel” and “Face” dichotomy derives from the art of kayfabe in the world of professional wrestling, a world in which Trump has moved (and may still move)[3]. From WikiPedia:
In professional wrestling, kayfabe (/ˈkeɪfeɪb/) is the portrayal of staged events within the industry as “real” or “true”, specifically the portrayal of competition, rivalries, and relationships between participants as being genuine and not staged. The term kayfabe has evolved to also become a code word of sorts for maintaining this “reality” within the direct or indirect presence of the general public.
Very much like politics. In these staged events, wrestlers assume characters:
The characters assumed by wrestlers can be distinguished into two alignments: faces and heels.
Faces, short for “babyfaces”, are hero-type characters whose personalities are crafted to elicit the support of the audience through traits such as humility, patriotism, a hard-working nature, determination, and reciprocal love of the crowd. Faces usually win their matches on the basis of their technical skills and are sometimes portrayed as underdogs to enhance the story.
Heels are villainous or antagonistic characters, whose personalities are crafted to elicit a negative response from the audience. They often embrace traditionally negative traits such as narcissism, egomania, unprompted rage, sadism, and general bitterness.
Above, I drew attention to Trump’s use of the word “love”; new for him, at least for this tiny sample. Here are WordCloud+’s usage examples of “love” in Trump’s RNC accepance speech:
The centrality of love is something a Face would extol, especially the Ultimate Face, Jesus of Nazareth. And so Trump, misquoting John 15:13 (to good effect: “others” for “friends”): “There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for others.” Trump even gives a shout-out to Fred Trump, the worst father in the world, who “used to love taking me to see Billy Graham.” Of course, there is Hannibal Lector (“he’s love to have you for dinner”). However, most of the usage examples involve kayfabe’s “reciprocal love of the crowd” (“there’s great love in the room”). I myself wouldn’t classify that as love at all; it reminds me of the parasocial relations that K-Pop fans have with their favored artists (or, for that matter, Beatlemania). I’d be even more concerned if “love” interpreted in this latter sense turned into a binding force among “committed nationalist militants.”
Trump: The Working Class
Trump’s acceptance speech contains two passages of direct interest to the working class. The first is “tips,” typically framed as a narrative:
At the center of our plan for economic relief, our massive tax cuts for workers that include something else that stood out to be very popular, actually, here, it’s very popular in this building and all those hotels that I saw that are so nice. I’m staying in a nice one. It’s called no tax on tips, no tax on no tax on tips.
I got that by having dinner recently in Nevada, where we’re leading by about 14 points.
We’re having dinner at a beautiful restaurant in the Trump Building on the strip, and it’s a great building. And the waitress comes over. How’s everything going? Really nice person. How’s everything? Oh, Sarah. So tough. The government’s after me all the time on tips, tips, tips. I said, well, they give you a cash, would they be able to find me? She said, actually, they didn’t know that.
Here Trump plays both parts in a conversation, which he does quite a bit. More:
She said very little cash is given. It’s all put right on the check. And they come in and they take so much of our money, it’s just ridiculous. And they don’t believe anything we say and they’ve just tired, as you know, 88,000 agents to go after them. Even more.
And I said, this shows the level of, you know, most people go out, they hire consultants, they pay millions of dollars. But I said to her, let me just ask you a question. Would you be happy if you had no tax and tip? She said, what a great idea. I got my information from a very smart waitress. That’s better than spending millions of dollars.
And everybody, everybody loves it. Waitresses and caddies and drivers and everybody’s a large, large group of people that are being really hurt badly. They make money. Let them keep their money.
(I haven’t checked to see if there really is a “Sarah.”) Notice that Trump slams the PMC (“consultants”) and upholds the working class (“very smart waitress”). At a policy level, I’m not sure I want to encourage nobles throwing gold coins to the peasants as they pass by in their carriages any more than they already do, but there’s no denying that “more money in your pocket” has its own appeal.
And on globalization and unions:
And right now, as we speak, large factories just started are being built across the border in Mexico. So with all the other things happening on our border, and they’re being built by China to make cars and to sell them into our country. No tax, no anything. The United Auto Workers ought to be ashamed for allowing this to happen. And the leader of the United Auto Workers should be fired immediately. And every single auto worker union and non union should be voting for Donald Trump, because we’re going to bring back car manufacturing and we’re going to bring it back fast.
They’re building some of the largest auto plants anywhere in the world. Think of it, in the world. And we’re going to bring it back. We’re going to make them we don’t mind the we don’t mind that happening. But those plants are going to be built in the United States. And our people are going to man those plant.
And if they don’t agree with us, we’ll put a tariff of approximately 100 to 200% on each car, and they will be unsellable in the United States.
We still have to built our own plants here, of course. But nevertheless!
Conclusion
One recent talking point from Democrats has been that the Republicans geared their whole campaign around Biden’s age. There’s no sign of that in this speec. Trump remarks:
They will not have done the damage that Biden has done, only going to use the term once. Biden. I’m not going to use the name anymore. Just one time.
Biden, or rather whichever Biden staffer is, or possibly was, in charge of his account, reacted to Trump’s acceptance speech as follows:
I’m stuck at home with COVID, so I had the distinct misfortune of watching Donald Trump’s speech to the RNC.
What the hell was he talking about?
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) July 20, 2024
And I think “What the hell was he talking about?” is a fair reaction, especially if you’ve got West Wing brain and conceive of a Presidential as a well-crafted script of policy talking points and the occasional clever aphorism. I’m still struggling through breaking down Trump’s rhetoric, because quite frankly I’m a big fan of terse, especially in others, but it seems to me that what Trump is all about is the relationship to a crowd, an actual, visible, tangible crowd. There, Trump is in his element, and everything he says — jazzy riffing, digressions, verbal oddities, religiosity, and all — is designed to maintain that connection. Very much unlike all other politicians in the field today.
NOTES
[1] In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt was shot while giving a speech and, also remarkably, continued on speaking. But he didn’t describe the shooting in the speech, let alone an acceptance speech.
[2] I cut this part out for brevity: “And there’s an interesting statistic. The ears are the bloodiest part. If something happens with the ears, they bleed more than any other part of the body. For whatever reason. The doctors told me that. They said, why is there so much blood? He said, it’s the ears. They bleed more. So we learned something, but they just, they just, this beautiful crowd, they didn’t want to leave me. They knew I was in trouble. They didn’t want to leave me. And you can see that love written all over their faces.” “So we learned something.”
[3] Needless to say, “I don’t love Trump.” I’m looking at his work as an exercise in rhetoric. When I say “simple and direct,” for example, I’m not saying true; the most I might say is “plausible.” For all I know, to Trump the showman, the story of his assassination is genuine imitation kayfabe all the way down (I, for example, have been spoken to about mediating serious emotional events through literature, as opposed to direct and genuine feeling, whatever that may be).
[4] Interestingly, in kayfabe the crowd can also be a “pseudo-character”: “In the WWE Universe era, the crowd also can be spontaneously used, mostly as a Heel, either to distract promo, build more heat to heels, or used to distract referees on their count-outs to force a result, even when they have no physical power or rights to fight the wrestlers.” Trump, however, makes the crowd in Butler, PA a Face.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/07 ... ntion.html.
There it is, that 'wrastling' I was talking about. It is about the level of political discourse we have. It was never all that great but has become cartoonish at the highest levels, this purposefully done by the purveyors of discourse who happily dwell in the Marvel Universe.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."
Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy
Trump victory is best for Israel: Ben Gvir
Israel's National Security Minister says Trump would give Israel backing to go to war with Iran and Hezbollah
News Desk
JUL 24, 2024
Head of the Otzma Yehudit party National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir leads a faction meeting at the Knesset on January 1, 2024. (Photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir took the unusual step of endorsing Donald Trump as the next US president, saying the ex-leader's return would bolster the chances of victory against Iran and the rest of the Axis of Resistance.
“I believe that with Trump, Israel will receive the backing to act against Iran,” the powerful minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government told Bloomberg in an interview published on 24 July. “With Trump it will be clearer that enemies must be defeated.”
Ben Gvir is the head of the Jewish Power party, which advocates ethnically cleansing Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza.
Ben Gvir has been a staunch opponent of any ceasefire deal with Hamas and has threatened to leave Netanyahu’s coalition if an agreement is reached.
The minister has emphasized that destroying Gaza and establishing Jewish settlements in the place of Palestinian cities is more important than bringing home Israeli captives held by the Palestinian resistance movement.
Hamas seeks to exchange Israelis taken captive on 7 October for some of the thousands of Palestinians Israel holds captive and tortures in its prisons.
Ben Gvir also wants a full-blown war with Iran’s close ally in Lebanon. “The sooner, the better,” he says of Hezbollah.
Ben Gvir’s comments come ahead of Netanyahu’s address to the US Congress in Washington on Wednesday. The prime minister will meet US President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday before traveling to Florida to see Trump on Friday.
Netanyahu has not endorsed a specific candidate, but his Likud Party has close links with Trump’s Republican Party.
Trump will likely face off against Harris in November’s presidential election after Biden announced last week that he will not remain the Democratic party’s candidate.
Ben Gvir criticized Biden, saying, “The US has always stood behind Israel in terms of armaments and weapons, yet this time the sense was that we were being reckoned with – that we were trying to be prevented from winning. That happened on Biden’s watch and fed Hamas with lots of energy.”
The US attitude toward Israel needs to change, he claimed, suggesting that will only happen if Trump regains the White House in November.
Ben Gvir is not satisfied with US support, even though President Biden and his Secretary of State Antony Blinken have supplied Israel with hundreds of ammunition shipments and a $14 billion military aid package since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza, which is widely viewed as a genocide against Palestinians.
Israeli airstrikes, shelling, and snipers have killed more than 39,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, since October.
https://thecradle.co/articles/trump-vic ... l-ben-gvir
Whadda slap in the face to the self-anointed 'America's #1 Zionist'.
An endorsement from genocidal maniacs, what more could ya want?
Israel's National Security Minister says Trump would give Israel backing to go to war with Iran and Hezbollah
News Desk
JUL 24, 2024
Head of the Otzma Yehudit party National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir leads a faction meeting at the Knesset on January 1, 2024. (Photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir took the unusual step of endorsing Donald Trump as the next US president, saying the ex-leader's return would bolster the chances of victory against Iran and the rest of the Axis of Resistance.
“I believe that with Trump, Israel will receive the backing to act against Iran,” the powerful minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government told Bloomberg in an interview published on 24 July. “With Trump it will be clearer that enemies must be defeated.”
Ben Gvir is the head of the Jewish Power party, which advocates ethnically cleansing Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza.
Ben Gvir has been a staunch opponent of any ceasefire deal with Hamas and has threatened to leave Netanyahu’s coalition if an agreement is reached.
The minister has emphasized that destroying Gaza and establishing Jewish settlements in the place of Palestinian cities is more important than bringing home Israeli captives held by the Palestinian resistance movement.
Hamas seeks to exchange Israelis taken captive on 7 October for some of the thousands of Palestinians Israel holds captive and tortures in its prisons.
Ben Gvir also wants a full-blown war with Iran’s close ally in Lebanon. “The sooner, the better,” he says of Hezbollah.
Ben Gvir’s comments come ahead of Netanyahu’s address to the US Congress in Washington on Wednesday. The prime minister will meet US President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday before traveling to Florida to see Trump on Friday.
Netanyahu has not endorsed a specific candidate, but his Likud Party has close links with Trump’s Republican Party.
Trump will likely face off against Harris in November’s presidential election after Biden announced last week that he will not remain the Democratic party’s candidate.
Ben Gvir criticized Biden, saying, “The US has always stood behind Israel in terms of armaments and weapons, yet this time the sense was that we were being reckoned with – that we were trying to be prevented from winning. That happened on Biden’s watch and fed Hamas with lots of energy.”
The US attitude toward Israel needs to change, he claimed, suggesting that will only happen if Trump regains the White House in November.
Ben Gvir is not satisfied with US support, even though President Biden and his Secretary of State Antony Blinken have supplied Israel with hundreds of ammunition shipments and a $14 billion military aid package since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza, which is widely viewed as a genocide against Palestinians.
Israeli airstrikes, shelling, and snipers have killed more than 39,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, since October.
https://thecradle.co/articles/trump-vic ... l-ben-gvir
Whadda slap in the face to the self-anointed 'America's #1 Zionist'.
An endorsement from genocidal maniacs, what more could ya want?
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."