December 17, 19:14
Iranian Foreign Ministry on the situation in Palestine
"After 70 days, Hamas was not destroyed. The resistance was not disarmed. Zionist prisoners of war were not released during the war. The forced migration plan for Gazans was unsuccessful.
Despite continued war crimes against women and children, Palestine is now the final winner in this unequal field.
Zionist regime authorities continue to commit crimes more heinous than the actions of ISIS, but they must make progress and be able to compensate for their shameful historical failure." (c) Iranian Foreign Ministry
PS. Today, another major shipping company, OOCL, has stopped shipping to Israel via the Red Sea.
PS2. In the US, according to a Harvard-Harris polling survey, more than half of young people under 25 believe the creation of a Palestinian state led by Hamas is justified and the liquidation of the State of Israel.
PS3. The United States is trying to create a coalition in the Middle East to attack Yemen, but even if this succeeds, Yemen has endured 7 years of systematic bombing by the Saudi coalition, and the start of such attacks will only lead to increased attacks on ships in the Red Sea, where shipping may cease altogether.
https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8834669.html
Google Translator
******
When Genocide Is No Longer Genocide
Margaret Kimberley, BAR senior columnist 13 Dec 2023
William Patterson was the driving force behind the We Charge Genocide petition.
Some of Israel's defenders want to do away with the concept of genocide in hopes of washing away its war crimes. Any redefinition would allow the U.S. to disappear the many genocides it has committed domestically and internationally.
“We maintain, therefore, that the oppressed Negro citizens of the United States, segregated, discriminated against and long the target of violence, suffer from genocide as the result of the consistent, conscious, unified policies of every branch of government.”
We Charge Genocide, Civil Rights Congress, 1951
Wall Street Journal editor Adam Kirsch recently penned an opinion piece entitled, “Is It Time to Retire The Term ‘Genocide’? The Meaning of Genocide “. Why would anyone want to stop using the word genocide? To make a 1,700 word story short, the goal is to defend Israel and argue that it is not committing genocide against the people of Gaza.
The tortured and long winded supposition just doesn’t hold up to scrutiny. Genocide was very clearly defined by the United Nations in its 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide .
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
These criteria certainly apply to the ongoing crime against Palestinians in Gaza, which includes bombing homes and hospitals, depriving access to water and electricity, extra-judicial killings, and arbitrary arrests and detentions. They also apply to U.S. wars ranging from Korea to Vietnam to Iraq and Libya and to the enslavement of Africans and the destruction of indigenous communities, theft of their lands, and the present day domestic mass incarceration system. There are a plethora of instances of genocide in United States and world history. Surely there is no logical reason to end the use of this very important word.
Unless of course the rationale for doing so is political. Nowhere in Kirsch’s piece does he reference the United Nations definition, which has been universally accepted since 1948. The truth is just too inconvenient for the United States and its close ally Israel, which was founded as a Jewish state and makes the World War II genocide of European Jews a defense for its very existence and for all of its actions.
The word genocide quite rightly conveys very grave violations of human rights. In this latest effort to silence critics of U.S. and Israeli policy the word itself is under attack. As such it is especially important for Black people to be part of this discussion and debate.
It was Black led organizations such as the Civil Rights Congress which dared to name the evil, to say that genocidal acts extended far beyond Nazi death camps in Europe.
Now Black people have been targeted in this latest wave of censorship and punishment. It is Black students at Harvard and other universities who were harassed and doxxed and lost job opportunities. Black members of the Congressional Black Caucus Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman are facing primary opponents as punishment for being insufficiently pro-Israel. The liberation struggle is itself under attack if the word genocide is suddenly downgraded in importance.
The effort to defend Israel must be opposed for obvious reasons. The people of Gaza are under a brutal assault while the world watches as if nothing can be done. The U.S. is the one nation that could stop the carnage but won’t because it is on the same page with the Israeli state and its goal of ethnic cleansing in Gaza.
If the concept of genocide can suddenly be cast aside, if the concept of a settler colonial state is declared illegitimate for the sake of Israel, lies can be told about any crime. Rhetorical defense of oppressed peoples will be delegitimized and state terror will no longer be named as such.
It is not only correct but necessary for Black people to speak of ongoing genocides in this country. If one perpetrator is allowed to weasel out of culpability, even in language, atrocities of many kinds will be considered acceptable.
The word genocide is a useful and righteous weapon. That is why it is now being called into question. The guilty want to appear innocent and in the process disappear their criminality. So no, it is not time to disappear a word that is universally accepted and upheld as a necessity to protect humanity. Imagine how much worse the suffering will be if the ability to name a crime is removed from discourse.
Already the deaths of six million Congolese are rarely called genocide when they should be. Indigenous Americans and African descendants are sneered at when speaking of their experiences as genocides. The United Nations got it right in 1948. The intent to destroy a group was given a name and no one should be allowed to throw it out. Genocides have been committed throughout human history and they should be known as such.
https://blackagendareport.com/when-geno ... r-genocide
One State Reality
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor 13 Dec 2023
Pro-Palestinian protestors rally in support of Palestinians in Gaza
Recognizing the one state reality of Israel-Palestine instead of two-state dreaming would be a huge paradigm shift with huge implications.
On December 8th, the UN Security Council voted 13 to 1 for a resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. The US cast the only no vote, exercising its veto power, while the United Kingdom abstained. All of those present, excepting the Israeli Ambassador, called for a two-state solution, but more and more scholars and activists are now saying that a two-state solution is no longer possible. It’s been under discussion for 57 years without any progress, so it’s time for a paradigm shift.
That paradigm shift is, put simply, acknowledging that Israel is the only functioning state between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and that it’s a hugely unjust state keeping half its population, the Palestinian people, in miserable conditions, and all but 20% without citizenship and the rights that citizenship entails. Half of those, as we’re all now acutely aware, live in the concentration camp called Gaza that Israel has bombed for decades, more mercilessly than ever since October 7, 2023. The one-state reality is ugly, but continuing to imagine that there will finally be a two-state solution doesn’t make it any less so.
One hundred thirty-nine of the world’s 193 nations recognize the State of Palestine, but this is moral recognition, recognition of what should be, not of what is. Israel controls all the state apparatus, including the monopoly of force, and the Palestine Authority essentially plays the role of colonial administrator.
“The One State Reality ” is an anthology of essays devoted to this paradigm shift, its history, and its implications. Its subheading is, “What Is Israel/Palestine?” Its authors are scrupulously careful to say that they are trying to describe what is, not what should be, and that the Palestinian and Israeli people must ultimately make their decisions about moving forward.
The book is edited by George Washington University Professors Michael Barnett, Nathan J. Brown, and Marc Lynch, and University of Maryland Professor Shibley Telhami. It’s written by political scientists who use language and concepts specific to their academic discipline that are often difficult for the layperson to parse, but it’s full of insight for those with patience. As a layperson, I found it easiest to digest by reading the introduction and conclusion, then flipping through pages to chapter heads and subheads that particularly piqued my interest, and reading several every day rather than starting from page one and reading to the end.
Several chapters I found of particular interest were “What is Israel Palestine?” (the introduction), “Israel/Palestine: Toward Decolonization,” “Delegation Domination: Indirect Rule in the West Bank,” “American Jewry and the One State Reality,” and the concluding chapter, “Recognizing a One State Reality.”
I also found it helpful to search the index for key terms like “apartheid,” “settler colonialism,” “Oslo Accords,” “Security Council,” “West Bank,” and “Gaza.” To the layperson, this book may serve as an encyclopedia as much as a page-to-page read.
One of the central themes I found most important is that, as Marc Lynch wrote in his conclusion, “Negotiations toward two states were never sincere in this analysis, but merely cover for an ongoing process of colonization.” Another co-editor speaking at a book talk at the Middle East Institute’s Oman Library called the two-state solution an “opioid for the diplomatic classes.”
Speaking on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal , co-editor Shibley Telhamis said, “The reality of it is that you have in Israel a government that doesn’t really accept the idea of two states. You have ministers in that government that say, ‘All of the land belongs to us. Palestinians have to accept what they have, not equal rights, or at worse leave.’”
What are some of the implications of the paradigm shift from the two-state solution to the one-state reality? The academic authors of this book might be disturbed by my oversimplifications but these are the most basic implications that I derived from this book:
Accepting the paradigm shift would mean giving up on both the idea of a Jewish state and the idea of a Palestinian state, which some members of both communities might embrace while others would be alarmed.
Palestinian demands for full citizenship and equal rights might then supersede the now unrealistic demands for an independent Palestine.
If policymakers and institutions, including the UN Security Council and the General Assembly, were to accept the paradigm shift, they would be compelled to confront and deliberate the ugly one-state reality which Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Israeli NGO B’Tselem have all labeled apartheid, a crime against humanity. (This of course motivates policymakers— including the US President—who have enabled Israel’s injustices and atrocities not to accept the paradigm shift.)
In his concluding essay, Marc Lynch considers “Prospects for Ideational and Material Change” (a subhead of his chapter titled “Recognizing a One State Reality). Here he describes three possible consequences of accepting the description of Israel as an apartheid state:
“First, naming Israel’s system as ‘apartheid’ might trigger such revulsion at home [in Israel] that it leads to a domestic demand for change.” This, he says, “seems highly unlikely, given the rightward trend in Israeli politics.”
Second, “it could trigger some form of international response by states or international organizations.” This he also describes as unlikely.
“Third,” he writes, “naming Israel’s system as ‘apartheid’ could trigger global normative action at the societal and individual, rather than at the state, level. This effort to link the apartheid label to the production of a global cultural boycott comparable to that faced by South Africa is both the most plausible theory of change and the primary objective of the BDS movement.”
He goes on to praise BDS for shifting the terms of the debate about Israel and Palestine by “effectively invoking norms against colonialism and analogies to the cultural boycott of apartheid South Africa.” He also says it could be “one of the most widespread instances of solidarity politics in the world.”
I believe he was saying that the paradigm shift and all its implications are rising from the grassroots.
https://blackagendareport.com/one-state-reality
*****
On 70th day of Israel’s war, Palestinian death toll hit 19,000
Ignoring global calls for an immediate ceasefire Israel claims the war in Gaza will continue for months to come, denies any possibility for peace now
December 15, 2023 by Peoples Dispatch
Mass funeral in Khan Younis in southern Gaza on December 14, 2023. (Photo: Quds News Network)
At least 10 Palestinians were killed and several others were injured when Israeli strikes targeted an UN school and some residential buildings in Khan Younis in southern Gaza on early morning Friday, December 15, Wafa News Agency reported.
The UN refugee agency, UNRWA, has converted most of its schools in the besieged Palestinian territory as shelter camps for displaced people. Almost 80% of Gaza’s total population of 2.2 million is displaced due to Israel’s indiscriminate bombings and ground offensive.
Dozens of Palestinians were also killed in Israeli ground offensive in Rafah in southern Gaza where most of the displaced Palestinians are taking shelter.
Friday marks the 70th day since Israel started the war on Gaza on October 7. Over 19,000 Palestinians have been killed so far and over 54,000 people have been injured. Among the dead, nearly 18,800 deaths were reported in Gaza and at least 289 in the occupied West Bank. Most of the Palestinians killed are children, women and elderly.
The Israeli attacks on northern Israel’s Kamal Adwan school continued on the third day with more than 2,500 people who had taken shelter there were forced out. On Thursday, Israel had kidnapped 70 of its medical staff and caused the death of two injured Palestinians after preventing the medical staff from administering required treatment.
Israeli occupation forces also continued their aggression inside the occupied West Bank on Thursday and Friday. It bombed a refugee camp in Nablus moments after it announced the conclusion of its three days long raid on Jenin refugees camp, where at least 12 Palestinians were killed and over 500 were arrested. The renowned Freedom Theater in the Jenin Refugee Camp was also attacked by Israeli forces, who later arrested three of its members.
According to the reports, Israeli forces destroyed roads and other civic infrastructure in the camp and defiled the religious places on Thursday.
The UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres has written a report which is yet to be published demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The report addressed to the UN Security Council says that, “the scope of death and destruction in Gaza (caused by the Israeli war) has been unprecedented and unbearable.”
The international aid agencies continue to express concern about the growing humanitarian situation in Gaza. According to the founder of the Palestinian Children Relief Fund, Steve Sosebee, Palestinian children are now dying of hunger.
The OCHA expressed apprehensions on Thursday about the possibility of spread of diseases in the overcrowded camps for displaced Palestinians due to lack of sanitation and solid waste management amidst the heavy rain.
Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant during his meeting with White House National Security Advisor Jack Sullivan claimed that the war in Gaza will continue for a few more months despite the pressure created by the world community for an immediate ceasefire.
The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution with over two-third majority demanding immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza and release of all hostages on Tuesday.
Israel does not only deny the possibility of a ceasefire in Gaza but its officials have been giving contradictory statements related to post-war status of the Palestinian territory. On Wednesday, one of the Israeli ministers said Israeli settlements can be built inside Gaza.
On Thursday, Israeli President Issac Herzog claimed that there cannot be any talks of a “two-state solution” with Palestinians now.
https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/12/15/ ... hit-19000/
******
ACTION ALERT: NYT Misrepresents Zionism’s Opponents as Anti-Jewish Bigots
JIM NAURECKAS
“Is Anti-Zionism Always Antisemitic?” a New York Times article (12/10/23) by Jonathan Weisman asked. Trying to pinpoint the moment when “anti-Zionism crosses from political belief to bigotry,” Weisman suggested there were different kinds of anti-Zionism based on different visions of what Zionism means. But his effort to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable critics of Israel painted principled supporters of equal rights as antisemitic bigots.
Weisman offered one definition of Zionism—the way it was “once clearly understood”—as “the belief that Jews, who have endured persecution for millenniums, needed refuge and self-determination in the land of their ancestors.” To oppose this kind of Zionism “suggests the elimination of Israel as the sovereign homeland of the Jews”—which he said to many Jews “is indistinguishable from hatred of Jews generally, or antisemitism.” Their argument is:
Around half the world’s Jews live in Israel, and destroying it, or ending its status as a refuge where they are assured of governing themselves, would imperil a people who have faced annihilation time and again.
On the other hand, wrote Weisman, “some critics of Israel say they equate Zionism with a continuing project of expanding the Jewish state.” This kind of anti-Zionism merely opposes “an Israeli government bent on settling ever more parts of the West Bank,” land that could serve as “a separate state for the Palestinian people.”
These two views of Zionism seemed to represent the poles of acceptable and unacceptable anti-Zionism. The piece quoted Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) explaining that “some anti-Zionism” isn’t “used to cloak hatred of Jews”; Nadler stressed, though, that “MOST anti-Zionism—the type that calls for Israel’s destruction, denying its right to exist—is antisemitic.”
The Nexus Task Force, a group associated with the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, has a definition of antisemitism that is more tolerant of criticism of Israel than that of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, also cited by the Times. But it still insists, Weisman wrote, “that it is antisemitic to reject the right of Jews alone to define themselves as a people and exercise self-determination.”
Not ‘self-determination’
The phrase “self-determination” is doing a lot of work here. In international relations, it is generally used to mean that the residents of a geographical area inhabited by a distinct group have a right to decide whether or not they want that area to remain part of a larger entity. It’s a right that seems to come and go depending on political allegiances: When Albanians in Kosovo wanted to secede from Serbia, their right to do so was enforced with NATO bombs. If ethnic Russians who wanted to split off from Ukraine got help from Moscow, though, that wasn’t self-determination but a violation of Ukrainian sovereignty.
Jonathan Weisman (New York Times, 12/10/23): “Virulent anti-Zionism and virulent antisemitism ultimately intersect, at a very bad address for the Jews.”
To call Zionism a belief in Jewish “self-determination,” however, perverts the concept to include moving to a geographic region and forcibly expelling many of the people who already live there, in order to create a situation where members of your group can have a “sovereign homeland” where they “are assured of governing themselves.”
Ensuring the dominance of a particular ethnic group through forced migration is not usually called “self-determination,” but rather “ethnic cleansing.” This is the older version of Zionism that Weisman seems to suggest can only be opposed by antisemites.
It’s true that there is another vision of Zionism, unsatisfied with expelling the indigenous residents to the fringes of Israel/Palestine, that insists on incorporating those fringes. Ever since the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel has occupied the remaining parts of what was the League of Nations’ Palestine Mandate, where many refugees from the establishment of Israel were forced to live.
But because Zionism requires a Jewish state, the people who lived in those occupied territories could not be treated as citizens. Maintaining Israel’s veneer of democracy requires the political fiction that these undesirables are not part of the country that rules them, but instead belong to non-sovereign entities—like the Palestinian National Authority and the Gaza Strip—whose raison d’etre is to provide a rationale for why the bulk of the Palestinian population isn’t allowed to vote in Israeli elections.
As it happens, this is precisely the strategy that white-ruled South Africa employed to pretend that white supremacy was compatible with democracy; it called the fictitious countries that the nation’s Black majority supposedly belonged to “bantustans.” This and other resemblances to white South Africa are why leading human rights groups like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and Israel’s B’Tselem call Israel an apartheid state.
But both versions of Zionism involve the dismissal of one group’s rights in order to create a polity dominated by another group—a project that can certainly be opposed in either iteration without signifying animosity or prejudice toward anyone. (To be sure, there are antisemites who use “Zionists” as a transparent codeword for Jews. These are generally pretty easy to spot.)
A smear that needs correction
There is much to take issue with in Weisman’s article, but there is one point he makes that really warrants a correction. As an example of straightforward “Jew hatred,” he cites “holding Jews around the world responsible for Israeli government actions”—and offers as an example that this is what “pro-Palestinian protesters did last week outside an Israeli restaurant in Philadelphia.”
Weisman relied on this New York Times article (12/4/23), which gives no indication of talking to any protesters, to smear protesters as antisemitic.
But the protesters at Goldie, a vegan falafel restaurant, weren’t blaming “Jews around the world” for Israel’s assault on Gaza; they were holding Goldie’s owner, Israeli-born Michael Solomonov, responsible, because his restaurants had raised $100,000 for United Hatzalah, a medical organization that supports the Israeli Defense Forces.
According to the Guardian (12/8/23), which interviewed “protesters and current and former employees at Solomonov’s restaurants,” critics both inside and outside the staff were concerned that Solomonov hosted a fundraiser for prominent pro-Israel politicians, and had “booked and paid for multiple, lavish private dinners…for IDF members preparing to deploy to fight for Israel.” (The New York Times article—12/4/23—that Weisman linked to did not appear to be based on interviews with any protesters, but instead quoted numerous politicians condemning their demonstration.)
Obviously Solomonov and his critics have different views of his actions. But there is no evidence that protesters were targeting his restaurant simply because he was Jewish, and it’s an irresponsible smear for Weisman to assert that they were.
https://fair.org/home/action-alert-nyt- ... sh-bigots/
*******
WATCH: ‘They Stole a Country in Full Bloom’
December 15, 2023
Pro-Palestinian Israeli activist Miko Peled explains to a Melbourne, Australia audience Thursday how Israel stole Palestinian cities and farmland in 1948 and has continued its ethnic cleansing until today’s brutal operation in Gaza.
Video by Cathy Vogan for Consortium News
From MikoPeled.com: Miko Peled is an author, writer, speaker, and human rights activist living in the United States. He is considered by many to be one of the clearest voices calling for justice in Palestine, support of the Palestinian call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) and the creation of a single democracy with equal rights in all of historic Palestine.
Peled’s maternal grandfather, Avraham Katznelson was a signer on the Israeli Declaration of Independence. His father, Matti Peled was a general in the Israeli army and pioneered an Israeli-Palestinian dialogue in the 1970’s which led him to meeting Yasser Arafat in an effort to convene him to recognize the State of Israel and adopt the Two State Solution. In 1997, Miko’s sister lost her daughter, Smadar, in a suicide bombing in Jerusalem. This tragedy is what finally drove Miko to embark on his journey to discover Palestine.
Audience at Peled talk in Melbourne. (Cathy Vogan)
https://consortiumnews.com/2023/12/15/w ... ull-bloom/
*******
The IDF Are So Good At Killing Israelis They Should Consider Joining Hamas
Friendly fire during October 7, friendly fire on the battlefield in Gaza, friendly fire executions of Israeli prisoners. The IDF are so good at killing Israelis they should start making GoPro videos with red triangles about it.
Caitlin Johnstone
December 18, 2023
❖
Israeli forces reportedly drove bulldozers over hospital patients in tents and buried people alive. Palestinian officials are seeking an urgent probe into allegations of an IDF bulldozer attack on patients at the Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza, killing some twenty people.
That’s one of those things where even after everything that’s happened you still look at it and go “I must be reading this wrong.” You’d be considered a monster if you killed livestock in that way.
❖
IDF troops killed escaped Israeli hostages who were holding up a white flag, apparently because they mistook them for Palestinian civilians holding up a white flag (Israeli forces have a long and well-documented history of killing Gazans while they are waving white flags). The only reason they bothered to check if the abductees might be people whose lives they care about was reportedly because one of them had a “western appearance”, i.e. looked white.
Imagine being held hostage by Hamas for months, finally escaping, trying to make your way back home, and then getting killed by your own military forces because they mistook you for Palestinian civilians.
❖
Israel supporters always say “Hamas just needs to surrender and everything will be fine.”
Surrender? You mean wave a white flag?
❖
Friendly fire during October 7, friendly fire on the battlefield in Gaza, friendly fire executions of Israeli prisoners. The IDF are so good at killing Israelis they should start making GoPro videos with red triangles about it.
❖
“Mossad discovers sinister Hamas plot to just sit back and wait for the IDF to destroy Israel via friendly fire.”
❖
It’s not the Israel-Hamas War, it’s the Israel-Babies and Children And Women And Journalists and Healthcare Workers and UN Staff and Hospital Patients and Civilian Infrastructure and Israeli Hostages and Sometimes Occasionally Hamas War.
❖
It’s interesting how outside the IDF Israel and its supporters are predominantly all about freeing the hostages, but within the IDF the attitude toward the hostages seems at best to be depraved indifference and at worst outright hostility.
❖
Some weeks ago I saw a Hamas claim being circulated on Twitter that Hamas fighters had been luring IDF troops into ambushes by playing recordings of the sounds of children, and it was working because Israeli troops reliably go after kids. I didn’t pay much attention to the claim at the time, thinking “No way, that one can’t be true,” but now the IDF is indignantly complaining that “In an attempt to ambush our troops, Hamas terrorists connected dolls to speakers playing crying sounds and set them up in an area rigged with explosives.”
This keeps happening. Israel’s actions are so horrific and depraved that I keep thinking I must be misinterpreting what I’m reading or disregarding a claim as too implausibly over the top, only to find out that no, that’s exactly what happened. As bad as I know Israel is, it keeps finding new ways to show me I still don’t know the half of it.
❖
It’s so hard to say who’s in the right in this conflict. On one side you’ve got facts and evidence and a nonstop deluge of raw video footage documenting massacres of civilians day after day after day, but on the other side you’ve got people calling you an anti-semite if you disagree with them. It’s very complicated.
❖
It is not a coincidence that (A) video documentation of Israeli atrocities in Gaza has been extremely damaging to Israeli information interests and (B) journalists in Gaza are being killed by Israeli attacks at a rate which has no historical precedent.
❖
If you follow the “They started it!”, “No they started it!” arguments of the Israel-Palestine conflict back to their source at the beginning, you come to “Palestinians should have laid down and accepted their violent mass displacement and theft of their homes by Israel in 1948.”
❖
People are still yelling about “From the river to the sea” chants at pro-Palestine demonstrations, but you know if a different pro-Palestine chant becomes ubiquitous it will with 100% certainty be attacked as evil and anti-semitic too. Pro-Palestine slogans aren’t opposed because anyone sincerely believes they support genocide, they’re opposed because they are pro-Palestine.
❖
Biden’s presidency has turned out to be everything anti-imperialists feared it would be, and so much worse.
https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2023/12 ... ing-hamas/
Hezbollah published a montage edit showing resistance operations by Palestine, Hezbollah, Iraq and Yemen. It’s captioned as:
(@AryJeay) December 18, 2023
