Palestine

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:33 pm

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 6 - 7
January 7, 2024
Rybar

Image

The IDF operation continues in the Gaza Strip . The main fighting is taking place in the central and southern parts of the enclave. In the north, despite the announcement of the completion of the operation, clashes occur periodically, and the Israelis launch strikes from both UAVs and aircraft.

On the Western Bank the situation has not undergone significant changes. Israeli security forces continue to conduct police operations in various localities in the region. Palestinians actively oppose the police, and from time to time there are attempts at knife attacks or attacks on IDF soldiers.

The situation on the border with Lebanon is getting worse every day. The number of mutual strikes between the IDF and Hezbollah is growing, and strikes are taking place along the entire border. An explosion was heard in the waters of Haifa, and Israeli planes violated Lebanese airspace.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip
Despite the formal announcement of the successful completion of the operation in the northern Gaza Strip, the IDF still continues to carry out strikes in the region against identified targets. Thus, in the area of ​​Al-Fallujah Street in Jabaliya , the IDF carried out a bomb attack, in addition, a drone attacked a group of Palestinians, three of them were killed.

In addition, in the Ad-Daraj and At-Tuffa areas in the north of the sector, more militant tunnels were blown up, where weapons and places for hiding personnel were discovered.

Center of the Gaza Strip

Fierce fighting continues in the central part of the enclave in the Al-Maghazi camp and its surroundings. Palestinian forces announced mortar fire against IDF units, as well as the destruction of equipment in close combat, and, as is usually the case, without video recording equipment.

South Gaza Strip

In Rafah, an Israeli army drone struck a car carrying journalists, killing four reporters, including Ali Abu Ajwa , the grandson of Hamas co-founder Ahmed Ismail Yassin , and the son of Al-Jazeera's Gaza director Hamza Wael .

In Khan Yunis, IDF engineering units carried out bombings of buildings in the Al-Ma'an area , and Kataib Izz ad-Din al-Qassam reported shelling of Israeli forces in the Al-Mahatta area , but without details.

Border with Lebanon

On the border with Lebanon, the situation remains steadily tense: the IDF and Hezbollah are exchanging blows, firing at each other’s border facilities. Rebels claimed to have shelled an energy facility in the city of Hula . During the departure of the repair team, the city was shelled again, there were no casualties, one vehicle was damaged.


Footage of an IDF aircraft flying in Lebanese airspace appeared online : the plane flew along the coast for a long distance, some Lebanese sources stated that the plane was in the Beirut area . At the same time, there was a glitch at the airport in the Lebanese capital; local media reported a hacker attack.

In connection with the ongoing shelling, the Lebanese Minister of Education ordered the closure of all public and private educational institutions in the border area with Israel in the south of the country. Lebanese media reported that this measure was taken due to fears that the Israelis could launch an offensive ground operation.

West Bank

The main clashes took place in the refugee camp in Jenin , where IDF police units used an attack drone during one of the next raids, killing more than six Palestinians. The latter, in turn, detonated an explosive device under an armored car, wounding four IDF soldiers, two of them in serious condition.


In Al-Jib, a three-year-old girl was fatally wounded due to indiscriminate Israeli fire during an attempted terrorist attack.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image


Pro-Iranian groups in Iraq announced the use of an Arqab cruise missile against IDF targets in Haifa . There was no information about the work of the air defense, as well as about the arrivals: local residents talked about the fall of some object into the sea, presumably the missile went off course and did not hit the target.

A drone of Israeli or American origin struck a convoy of pro-Iranian forces in the area of ​​the Al-Qaim border crossing , near Al-Bukamal . Iraqi pro-Iranian proxies attacked the Golan Heights and a US base in Hasakah province near the village of Kasrok .

In the Red Sea, the US Navy destroyer USS Labone shot down a UAV launched from the Houthi-controlled part of Yemen , according to the Pentagon - the target was one of the US ships or cargo ships, and not Israeli territory.

Political-diplomatic background
On the negotiation process for the release of hostages

Negotiations on the release of Israeli prisoners have been suspended due to the assassination of Hamas leader Saleh al-Arouri , NBC News reports. Hamas has no incentive to release the remaining hostages; if they do so during a pause in negotiations, Israel will resume bombing, sources told the publication.

About the hacker attack on Beirut airport

Lebanese Christian group Soldiers of God hacked into the Beirut airport's internal network, posting an image with text on airport screens blaming Hezbollah rebels, local media reported. The report accuses Hezbollah of using Beirut's port , leading to its bombing several years ago, and now the group is accused of using the airport to provoke Israel into attacking: the cyberattack occurred as an IDF plane flew over the city.

However, three airport employees were later arrested: they allegedly deliberately committed sabotage; an investigation is underway. Later, members of the group themselves declared their non-involvement in the incident.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google TRanslator

*******

More Than 29,700 Palestinians Martyred and Missing by the Zionist Regime’s Aggression in Gaza
JANUARY 7, 2024

Image
A woman injured in Israeli airstrike being escorted to the Kamal Adwan hospital, northern Gaza, December 2023. Photo: Social media.

The government media office in Gaza reported 29,722 martyrs and missing persons since the start of the aggression against the Gaza Strip. This number includes over 7,000 Palestinians who remain missing, buried under the rubble of their bombed homes, and are presumed dead. The official death toll of 22,600 includes 10,000 children and 7,000 women. More than 58,000 Palestinians have been wounded.

Furthermore, according to the report, since the beginning of the aggression, the occupation has committed 1,903 massacres against civilians in the Gaza Strip.

The report added that 30 hospitals were taken out of service, and the occupation army stole gold and cash worth 90 million shekels from the Strip’s abandoned shops and financial institutions.

The Gaza Ministry of Health reported that the Zionist entity committed 12 massacres throughout the Gaza Strip on Saturday, January 6, the 92nd day of the aggression.

Israel’s Gaza Withdrawal, a Prelude to Full-Out War


The official Palestinian news agency WAFA reported that Israeli warplanes bombed a house in Al-Fallujah area in the northern Gaza Strip, killing 20 people and wounding dozens. The entity also carried out violent bombings on residential buildings in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza as well as on numerous residential blocks in Khan Younis in southern Gaza Strip.

Late Saturday night, occupation aircraft targeted an UNRWA shelter in the Al-Maghazi camp, killing four civilians, including women. The occupation forces also targeted ambulances that tried to rescue the victims.

In December 2023, UN Secretary General António Guterres presented a letter to the UN Security Council in which he used, for the first time during his mandate, Article 99 of the United Nations Charter, urging the UNSC to establish a permanent ceasefire in Gaza for humanitarian purposes.

South Africa has activated the Genocide Convention against “Israel” before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Preliminary hearings on the granting of provisional measures against the genocide will be held on coming Thursday and Friday in the ICJ headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands.

https://orinocotribune.com/more-than-29 ... n-in-gaza/

*******

Gazans held in 'torture camp' by Israeli army: Report

An new investigation details what happened to dozens of men taken captive by Israel after video circulated online showing them blindfolded, handcuffed, and stripped to their underwear in the streets in Gaza

News Desk

JAN 6, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

A new report by Tel Aviv-based +972 Magazine has documented the “systematic abuse and torture by Israeli soldiers” of dozens of Palestinian men who were taken captive in various parts of Gaza in December.

Israeli soldiers took videos and photos that circulated online, showing large groups of men they had rounded up, stripped to their underwear, handcuffed, and blindfolded. The men were lined up in rows, sitting in the street, and later taken away in military trucks to detention camps.


The report about their treatment by Israeli forces is based on testimony given to +972 Magazine from four Palestinian men who were later released, as well as testimony from 49 other men speaking with Arabic news outlets.

“According to these testimonies, Israeli soldiers subjected Palestinian detainees to electric shocks, burned their skin with lighters, spat in their mouths, and deprived them of sleep, food, and access to bathrooms until they defecated on themselves,” the report said.

Further, “Many were tied to a fence for hours, handcuffed, and blindfolded for most of the day. Some testified to having been beaten all over their bodies and having cigarettes extinguished on their necks or backs. Several people are known to have died as a result of being held in these conditions.”

The report noted, “the vast majority of these detainees were civilians and did not belong to the Hamas movement, as Israeli security officials later confirmed.”

In one case, the Israeli army entered a neighborhood and demanded that “All civilians must come down and surrender.”

The soldiers told the captives they had been arrested because “they didn’t evacuate to the southern Gaza Strip.”

Soldiers then lit some homes on fire. “Our house burned down in front of my eyes,” one man said. The fire spread uncontrollably, forcing soldiers to move the captive Palestinians away from the flames.

While speaking with a megaphone in front of dozens of men seated and handcuffed in the street, one Israeli commander declared: “The Israeli army has arrived. We destroyed Gaza [City] and Jabalia on your heads. We occupied Jabalia. We are occupying all of Gaza. Is that what you want? Do you want Hamas with you?”

Israeli ground forces invaded Gaza on 27 October, while the Israeli air force has bombed Gaza since 7 October when Hamas launched an attack on Israeli military bases and settlements surrounding the besieged enclave.

The Israeli bombing campaign has killed over 22,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, in three months, in what many view as genocide.

Last week, South Africa filed a suit against Israel at the International Criminal Court (ICJ) under the Genocide Convention.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/gazan ... rmy-report

West scrambles to deter Israel from war on Lebanon

Israeli officials have pushed to launch a pre-emptive war against Hezbollah since the start of the Gaza war on 7 October

News Desk

JAN 7, 2024

Image
Lebanon’s Foreign Minister Abdullah Abou Habib, left, receives Josep Borrell, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, in Beirut on January 6, 2024. (Photo credit: Anwar AMRO / AFP)

Israeli leaders are escalating their threats to start a full-fledged war against Hezbollah in Lebanon following Israel’s assassination of top Hamas leader Saleh al-Arouri in Beirut last week, a major terror attack in Iran, and a Hezbollah missile attack on a strategically crucial Israeli border surveillance base in response.

“We prefer the path of an agreed-upon diplomatic settlement,” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said Friday, “but we are getting close to the point where the hourglass will turn over,” The Washington Post reported on 7 January.

The Post added that “US officials are concerned that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may see an expanded fight in Lebanon as key to his political survival amid domestic criticism of his government’s failure to prevent Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack.”

Not only Netanyahu but Israeli military leaders have pushed for launching a pre-emptive war on Hezbollah. The Post noted further that “Since Hamas’s October assault, Israeli officials have discussed launching a pre-emptive attack on Hezbollah, US officials said.”

According to US intelligence reviewed by The Post, the Israeli army has hit the positions of the US-funded and trained Lebanese army more than 34 times since 7 October.

But US officials oppose a full-scale Israeli war against Lebanon, fearing it would draw Iran and other members of the Axis of Resistance into the war, forcing the “United States to respond militarily on Israel’s behalf.”

The brazen Israeli assassination of Hamas leader Saleh al-Arouri and six other Hamas officials in the Beirut suburb of Dahiya last week, coupled with a terror bombing in Iran that killed 83 civilians at a procession to commemorate the death of legendary Iranian general Qassem Soleimani the following day, suggests Israel is seeking to bait Hezbollah and Iran into a wider war.

Hezbollah responded to Arouri's assassination by firing 62 missiles at Israel’s Meron military base at the peak of Mount Meron (Mount Jarmaq). The base is a headquarters for administration, surveillance, and air control for Israeli army activities on its northern front.

This has caused US and EU officials to launch a flurry of diplomatic activity to stave off a wider war.

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell visited Lebanon on Sunday to meet with top Hezbollah officials, while the top US diplomat, Antony Blinken, is set to travel to Tel Aviv for talks with the Israeli leadership on Monday.

Borrell met with the leader of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc in Lebanon, Mohammad Raad, whose son, a Hezbollah fighter, was killed in an Israeli strike on a home in southern Lebanon in November.

Secretary of State Blinken is set to discuss specific steps to “avoid escalation” with Israeli leaders, his spokesman, Matt Miller, said.

“It is in no one’s interest — not Israel’s, not the region’s, not the world’s — for this conflict to spread beyond Gaza,” Miller said.

However, Blinken recently used emergency authorization to bypass the US Congress and send additional munitions to Israel that would be crucial in any broader war with Hezbollah. Blinken and others in the White House have repeatedly said they would put “no red lines” on Israel’s use of US weapons despite widespread accusations that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

Last week, South Africa filed suit against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for violating the genocide convention.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/west- ... on-lebanon

*******

South Africa Presents a Devastating Case Against Israel Exposing Genocidal Acts in Horrifying Detail
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JANUARY 2, 2024
Robert Herbst

Image
Israeli soldiers stationed just outside Gaza overlooking the destruction of the Shujaiya neighborhood in Gaza City, December 29 2023. (Photo: © Atef Safadi/EFE via ZUMA Press APAimages)

South Africa’s 84 page long Application to the International Court of Justice to begin proceedings against Israel for its genocide in Gaza is a devastating document laying out Israel’s genocidal acts and statements in horrifying detail.


On Thursday, December 28, South Africa filed an Application Instituting Proceedings at the International Court of Justice to commence proceedings in a legal forum against Israel for its genocide in Gaza, and to press for “provisional measures” – a preliminary order requiring the Israel Government and military to cease their genocidal acts in Gaza pending a full hearing by the court.

PRESS RELEASE: #SouthAfrica institutes proceedings against #Israel and asks the #ICJ to indicate provisional measures https://t.co/WedDXvtBD4 pic.twitter.com/VCCDyORrLy

— CIJ_ICJ (@CIJ_ICJ) December 29, 2023

South Africa’s Application is 84 pages long and devastating – to the State of Israel, to its Jewish political and military leaders and personnel committing the genocidal acts and speaking openly of their genocidal intent, to those in Israel, America, and Europe standing so firmly in support of them, and to the Jewish people in whose name Israel purports to act.

The Application lays out these genocidal acts and statements in horrifying detail, after noting the contextual background so often missing in diplomatic and mainstream media discussion of the Gaza war. Israel’s acts of genocide, says South Africa:

“are distinct from other violations of international law sanctioned or perpetrated by the Israeli government and military in Gaza — including intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population, civilian objects and buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science, historic monuments, hospitals, and places where the sick and wounded are collected; torture; the starvation of civilians as a method of warfare; and other war crimes and crimes against humanity” – all of which have occurred “in the broader context of Israel’s [] 75-year-long apartheid, its 56-year-long belligerent occupation of Palestinian territory and its 16-year-long blockade of Gaza[.]”

Indeed, one of the most salient parts of the Application is its meticulous documentation of the misery that Israel imposed on Gazans before October 7, imposing a stringent blockade and effectively sealing them off from the outside world, reducing the area available for farming, severely reducing their ability to fish in the 20-mile zone stipulated in the Oslo Accords, and severely restricting food imports by calories per head to a humanitarian minimum after its “disengagement” and Hamas’s election victory in 2006, restricting electrical power, and polluting the coastal aquifer, the sole source of natural drinking water, all severely impairing daily living and the economy, resulting in a 45 percent unemployment rate and a 60 percent poverty rate, with 80 percent of the population dependent on some form of international assistance. And in the three years before October 7, Israel killed approximately 7,500 Gazans, including approximately 1,700 children. Over 18 months of weekly, peaceful protests at the separation fence against the blockade, Israeli snipers killed hundreds and wounded over 36,000, including nearly 9,000 children. Almost 5,000 unarmed people were shot in the lower limbs, deliberately, many standing hundreds of meters away.

All that would be bad enough. But, as the Application demonstrates, Israel has descended to a whole new level of criminality that clearly meets the definition of genocide under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide: “acts intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnic group.”

Gaza’s 2.3 million people clearly form a substantial part of that group, which numbers 5.5 million under occupation. The Application thoroughly documents these genocidal acts that violate the Convention: “killing Gazans en masse, causing them serious bodily and mental harm, and inflicting on them conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction.”

As the Application explains:

“Israel has now killed in excess of 21,110 named Palestinians, including over 7,729 children — with over 7,780 others missing, presumed dead under the rubble — and has injured over 55,243 other Palestinians, causing them severe bodily and mental harm. Israel has also laid waste to vast areas of Gaza, including entire neighbourhoods, and has damaged or destroyed in excess of 355,000 Palestinian homes [more than 60% of Gaza’s housing stock], alongside extensive tracts of agricultural land, bakeries, schools, universities, businesses, places of worship, cemeteries, cultural and archaeological sites, municipal and court buildings, and critical infrastructure, including water and sanitation facilities and electricity networks, while pursuing a relentless assault on the Palestinian medical and healthcare system. Israel has reduced and is continuing to reduce Gaza to rubble, killing, harming and destroying its people, and creating conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction as a group.”

Israel now has to decide how to respond, both to the merits of South Africa’s claims and to the request for preliminary relief. Israel has an obligation as a UN member and a party to the Genocide Convention to respond, and it faces a judgment rather than merely an advisory opinion if it loses. This well-crafted, well-documented accusation of genocide is therefore an important and immediate legal and moral challenge to the Jewish State less than a century after the Holocaust.

Israel has already issued its first broadside condemning South Africa for launching its case against it, calling upon the ICJ “to completely reject South Africa’s baseless claims.” The Israeli Foreign Ministry’s statement called it a “blood libel” by a nation cooperating with a terrorist organization, and claimed that its army directs its military efforts only against Hamas.

Genocidal intent

No one who reads South Africa’s Application for themselves could possibly credit Israel’s claim above because the statements of senior Israeli officials demonstrating genocidal intent are displayed in all their infamy – from the Prime Minister, President and Minister of Defense on down — proving that Israel is deliberately fighting a war against the entire Palestinian population of Gaza. Here are some of the most disgusting morsels:

Prime Minister Netanyahu: invoking the Biblical story of the total destruction of the Amalek by the Israelites, which Biblical passage reads in relevant part: “Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses.”

President Herzog:

“It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. It’s not true this rhetoric about civilians not aware not involved. It’s absolutely not true. … and we will fight until we break their backbone.”

Minister of Defense Gallant:

Israel is “imposing a complete siege on Gaza. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel. Everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.”

“Gaza won’t return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything. If it doesn’t take one day, it will take a week. It will take weeks or even months, we will reach all places.”


Minister for National Security Ben-Gvir:

“[t]o be clear, when we say that Hamas should be destroyed, it also means those who celebrate, those who support, and those who hand out candy — they’re all terrorists, and they should also be destroyed.”

Minister of Energy and Infrastructure Katz:

“All the civilian population in Gaza is ordered to leave immediately. We will win. They will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.”

Minister of Finance Smotrich:

We need to deal a blow that hasn’t been seen in 50 years and take down Gaza.”

Minister of Heritage Eliyaahu:

“The north of the Gaza Strip, more beautiful than ever. Everything is blown up and flattened, simply a pleasure for the eyes … We must talk about the day after. In my mind, we will hand over lots to all those who fought for Gaza over the years and to those evicted from Gush Katif” [a former Israeli settlement]. “There is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza.”

Minister of Agriculture Dichter:

“We are now actually rolling out the Gaza Nakba.”

Knesset Deputy Speaker and Foreign Affairs and Security Committee Member Vaturi:

“Now we all have one common goal — erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth.”

Israeli military officials have echoed their political leaders’ calls to genocide:

Israeli Reservist Major General and adviser to the Defense Minister Eiland:

“This is what Israel has begun to do — we cut the supply of energy, water and diesel to the Strip . . . But it’s not enough. In order to make the siege effective, we have to prevent others from giving assistance to Gaza . . . The people should be told that they have two choices; to stay and to starve, or to leave. If Egypt and other countries prefer that these people will perish in Gaza, this is their choice.”

“When you are at war with another country you don’t feed them, you don’t provide them electricity or gas or water or anything else . . . A country can be attacked in a much broader way, to bring the country to the brink of dysfunction. This is the necessary outcome of events in Gaza.”

“Israel has no interest in the Gaza Strip being rehabilitated and this is an important point that needs to be made clear to the Americans.”

“The State of Israel has no choice but to make Gaza a place that is temporarily, or permanently, impossible to live in.”

“If there is an intention for a military action at Shifa [Hospital], which I think is inescapable, I hope that the head of the CIA got an explanation of why this is necessary, and why the US must ultimately back even an operation like this, even if there are thousands of bodies of civilians in the streets afterward.”

“Israel needs to create a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, compelling tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands to seek refuge in Egypt or the Gulf . . . Gaza will become a place where no human being can exist.”

“Who are the ‘poor’ women of Gaza? They are all the mothers, sisters or wives of Hamas murderers. . . . The international community warns us of a humanitarian disaster in Gaza and of severe epidemics. We must not shy away from this, as difficult as that may be. After all, severe epidemics in the south of the Gaza Strip will bring victory closer . . . It is precisely its civil collapse that will bring the end of the war closer. When senior Israeli figures say in the media ‘It’s either us or them’ we should clarify the question of who is ‘them’. ‘They’ are not only Hamas fighters with weapons, but also all the ‘civilian’ officials, including hospital administrators and school administrators, and also the entire Gaza population who enthusiastically supported Hamas and cheered on its atrocities on October 7th.”


Ninety-five-year-old Ezra Yachin, a veteran of the Deir Yassin massacre during the 1948 Nakba, called up for reserve duty as a motivational speaker to “boost morale” among Israeli troops ahead of the ground invasion, said to social media while being driven around in an Israeli army vehicle, in IDF fatigues:

“Be triumphant and finish them off and don’t leave anyone behind. Erase the memory of them. Erase them, their families, mothers and children. These animals can no longer live . . . Every Jew with a weapon should go out and kill them. If you have an Arab neighbour, don’t wait, go to his home and shoot him . . . We want to invade, not like before, we want to enter and destroy what’s in front of us, and destroy houses, then destroy the one after it. With all of our forces, complete destruction, enter and destroy. As you can see, we will witness things we’ve never dreamed of. Let them drop bombs on them and erase them.”

The Application draws the only possible conclusion:

The above statements by Israeli decision-makers and military officials indicate in and of themselves a clear intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a group “as such.” They also constitute clear direct and public incitement to genocide, which has gone unchecked and unpunished. The clear inference from the acts of the Israeli army on the ground — including from the vast number of civilians killed and injured, and the scale of displacement, destruction and devastation wrought in Gaza — is that those genocidal statements and directives are being implemented against the Palestinian people.

The Application goes on to quote IDF soldiers stationed on the ground in Gaza whose observations support that conclusion, along with similar widespread genocidal rhetoric among non-cabinet Knesset members, Israeli media and civil society generally. The fundamental theme is that there are no innocents in Gaza, only 2.3 million terrorists, who must be wiped out — Dresden and Hiroshima often cited as positive examples.

All this convincingly proves that Israel’s response to the October 7 attack was not primarily targeted at Hamas, as Israel claims, but rather at the Gaza population as a whole, designed to inflict maximum collective punishment on non-combatants, and to encourage, if not require, the entire Gazan population to leave, after which they would not be permitted to return. This huge ethnic cleansing dwarfs that of 1948. With its intent to destroy a large part of the Palestinian group remaining in Palestine clearly established, Israel’s acts set forth in excruciating detail in the Application constitute genocide.

Genocidal acts

And they are truly nauseating to read, digest and contemplate. They are summarized as follows: “(1) killing Palestinians in Gaza, including children, in large numbers; (2) causing serious bodily and mental harm to Palestinians in Gaza, including Palestinian children; and inflicting on them conditions of life intended to bring about their destruction a group. Those conditions include: (3) expulsions from homes and mass displacement, alongside the large-scale destruction of homes and residential areas; (4) deprivation of access to adequate food and water; (4) deprivation of access to adequate medical care; (5) deprivation of access to adequate shelter, clothes, hygiene and sanitation; and (6) the destruction of the life of the Palestinian people in Gaza; and (7) imposing measures intended to prevent Palestinian births.”

I am going to try to give you a sense of the evidence South Africa’s lawyers have compiled in each of these sections, but to really appreciate the gruesome reality of what Israel has done and continues to do, it is worth reading them in their entirety.

1. Killing Palestinians

The heavy unguided bombs Israel has used in Gaza have a “predicted lethal radius” of up to 360 metres – that’s between a fifth and a quarter of a mile (4 to 5 city blocks) — and are “expected to cause severe injury and damage as far as 800 metres – a half mile (10 city blocks) in all directions from the point of impact.” So imagine you are standing in Times Square in New York City. Look 4 blocks to the North and South, and to the East and West. That’s the kill zone of each of these bombs. There is no way that those using these munitions, supplied by the United States, in one of the most densely populated areas in the world, are not intentionally killing huge numbers of non-combatants – women, children, whole families, together – by the hundreds at a time, and are doing so intentionally. Over 115 Palestinian children have been killed every day. “It is estimated that more Palestinian children were killed in the first three weeks in Gaza alone (a total of 3,195) than the total number of children killed each year across the world’s conflict zones since 2019.” This is deliberate, wholesale slaughter.

“Palestinians in Gaza have been killed in their homes, in places where they sought shelter, in hospitals, in UNWRA schools, in churches, in mosques, and as they tried to find food and water for their families. They have been killed if they failed to evacuate, in the places to which they fled, and even while they attempted to flee along Israeli declared “safe routes.” Reports are multiplying of Israeli soldiers performing summary executions, including of multiple members of the same family — men, women and older people.”

“To date, Israel has killed: over 311 doctors, nurses and other health workers, including doctors and ambulance drivers killed on duty;103 journalists, amounting to over one per day, and more than 73 per cent of the total number of journalists and media workers killed globally in 2023; 40 civil defence workers — responsible for helping to dig victims out of the rubble — killed while on duty; and over 209 teachers and educational staff. 144 United Nations employees have also been killed, the “highest number of aid workers killed in UN history in such a short time.”


2. Causing serious bodily and mental harm to Palestinians in Gaza

The majority of the 55,000 wounded are women and children. One thousand of those kids have lost one or both legs. The white phosphorus Israel uses causes “deep and severe burns, penetrating even through bone, and capable of reigniting after initial treatment. There are no functioning hospitals in the North of Gaza, in particular, so injured persons are reduced to “waiting to die,” without surgery or medical treatment beyond first aid, and dying slow, agonizing deaths from their injuries or from infection.

“The extreme levels of bombardment and lack of any safe areas are also causing severe mental trauma in the Palestinian population in Gaza.” That comes on top of severe trauma from prior attacks, which left 80 percent of Palestinian children experiencing higher levels of emotional distress, demonstrating bedwetting (79 percent) and reactive mutism (59 percent), and engaging in self-harm (59 percent), and suicidal thoughts (55 percent). Eleven weeks of relentless bombardment, displacement, and loss have only magnified and intensified that trauma, which is unimaginable for the estimated tens of thousands of Palestinian children who have lost at least one parent and those who are the sole surviving members of their families.

3. Mass expulsion from homes and displacement of Palestinians

Over 1.9 million out of 2.3 million Gazans, 85% of the population, have been forced from their homes, notwithstanding that there is nowhere safe to flee. Israel has accomplished this through evacuation orders and killing those who cannot leave or refuse to do so. In early December, Israel dropped leaflets urging Gazans to leave areas in the South to which they had previously been told to flee, reneging even on its false promises of safety. According to the UN Secretary General, “the people of Gaza are being told to move like human pinballs – ricocheting between ever-smaller slivers of the south, without any of the basics for survival.” Besides wreaking terror among the displaced, the increased population density which results renders the continuing Israeli bombardments even more lethal. This cannot be an accident; it is knowing and willful. Because 60% of Gaza’s housing stock has been damaged or destroyed, the forced evacuation from homes is “necessarily permanent.” And the extent of the destruction of Gaza has rendered an open-air prison now “largely unlivable.” With housing and civilian infrastructure “razed to the ground,” this permanent mass forced displacement is “genocidal, in that they are taking place in circumstances calculated to bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza.”

4. Deprivation of access to adequate food and water to Palestinians in Gaza

Between October 9 and 21, Israel imposed a complete siege on Gaza – no electricity, food, water, or fuel. Since October 21, a few aid trucks have been allowed in, well below the previous 500 trucks a day. Since November 21, importation of some fuel has been permitted, but “well below the minimum requirements for humanitarian operations,” as it cannot easily be moved around Gaza from the entry points. So it cannot reach most of the people in need.

The December 22 Security Council Resolution is of little or no help because it does not properly address the four elements identified by the UN for allowing effective humanitarian aid: security, staff, logistics, and the resumption of commercial activities. The relentless Israeli bombardment, the inability of UN staff to live and work in safety, the UN trucks destroyed or left behind in the hurried evacuation of North Gaza, and the interruption of communications have all “massively hampered the aid operation.”

“Most of the Palestinian people in Gaza are now starving, with levels of starvation rising daily.”

“Four out of five of the hungriest people anywhere in the world are in Gaza.”

“An unprecedented 93% of the population in Gaza is facing crisis levels of hunger, with insufficient food and high levels of malnutrition.”

The World Health Organization is calling Israel’s actions in cutting off Gaza “from water, food, anything which is necessary for any sort of life” “a cruel campaign,” brought “against the whole population of Gaza.”

The conditions created by the siege are exacerbated by Israel’s continuing strikes on Gaza, including on its bakeries, water facilities and last remaining operating mill, and its razing of agricultural lands, crops, orchards and greenhouses.

Water is also severely depleted. Israel continues to cut off piped water for the North of Gaza, and the North’s water desalination plant is non-functioning. From 15 October 2023, Israel began piping a small amount of water to the South, in part to “push the civilian population to the southern [part of the] Strip.” The damage from Israeli airstrikes and shelling has also rendered most of the water system inoperable. The World Food Programme has reported that there is only 1.5 to 1.8 litres of clean water available per person per day, for all uses (drinking, washing, food preparation, sanitation and hygiene). This is far below the ‘emergency threshold’ of 15 litres per day for “war or famine-like conditions,” or the ‘survival threshold’ of 3 litres per day.

Experts are now predicting that more Palestinians in Gaza may die from starvation and disease than airstrikes, and yet Israel is intensifying its bombing campaign, precluding the effective delivery of humanitarian assistance to Palestinians. It is clear that Israel is through its actions and policies in Gaza, deliberately inflicting on Palestinians conditions of life calculated to bring about their destruction.


5. Deprivation of access to adequate shelter, clothes, hygiene and sanitation to Palestinians in Gaza

1.2 million of the 1.9 million displaced Gazans are seeking shelter in the schools and tents run by UNRWA, which are unsafe. Israel has killed hundreds of Palestinians there despite Israel having been provided the coordinates of all UN facilities — facilities which UNRWA acknowledged on December 7 is “on the verge of collapse.” On average, 486 people use a single toilet. Oxfam reports that newborns in shelters are dying from avoidable causes because of the absence of adequate sanitation, food, water and medical care.

Those in shelters are better off than the other 700,000 displaced, many of whom are in hospital courtyards, makeshift camps, or simply live and sleep in the streets, exposed to the elements. There is an average of one shower for every 4500 people.

On 20 December 2023, the Director General of the World Health Organization warned that “Gaza is already experiencing soaring rates of infectious disease outbreaks. Diarrhoea cases among children aged under 5 are 25 times what they were before the conflict. Such illnesses can be lethal for malnourished children, more so in the absence of functioning health services.” Sewage is flowing into the streets where Palestinians are living, as it can no longer be managed. “Everywhere you look, is congested with makeshift shelters. Everywhere you go, people are desperate, hungry and terrified.” These conditions — deliberately inflicted by Israel — are calculated to bring about the destruction of the Palestinian group in Gaza.

6. Deprivation of adequate medical assistance to Palestinians in Gaza

“Almost above all else, Israel’s military assault on Gaza has been an attack on Gaza’s medical healthcare system, indispensable to the life and survival of the Palestinians in Gaza.”

On December 7, the UN Special Rapporteur noted that “[t]he healthcare infrastructure in the Gaza strip has been completely obliterated.”

On December 4, the International President of f Médecins Sans Frontières wrote:

“We are watching as hospitals are turned into morgues and ruins.”

“Medical staff, including our own, are utterly exhausted and in despair.”


Since early December 2023, Israeli army attacks on Palestinian hospitals “have only increased. The Israeli army has continued to attack and besiege hospitals and healthcare centres; to deprive them of electricity and fuel crucial to maintain effective functioning and equipment; to obstruct them from receiving medical supplies, food and water; to force their evacuations and closure; and effectively to destroy them. . . . Israel has transformed Palestinian hospitals in Gaza from places of healing into ‘death zone[s]” and scenes of “bloodbath,” “death, devastation and despair.” Many hospitals have now become mere “place[s] where people are waiting to die.”

“There have now been more than 238 attacks on ‘healthcare’ in Gaza, in which over 61 hospitals and other healthcare facilities have been damaged or destroyed. . . . The Israeli army has targeted hospital generators, hospital solar panels, and other life-saving equipment, such as oxygen stations and water tanks. It has also targeted ambulances, medical convoys and first responders. Health workers have been killed (on average four killed per day)[.]”

“The systematic destruction of Palestinian hospitals and the killing of specialist Palestinian doctors is not only impacting the care of Palestinians in Gaza at present, it is also undermining the prospect of a future Palestinian healthcare system in Gaza, destroying its capacity to rebuild and to care effectively for the Palestinian people in Gaza.”

“Doctors and medics have continued not only to be killed but also to be rounded up and disappeared by the Israeli authorities. They include the General Director of Al Shifa and his staff, seized and held incommunicado since 23 November 2023.”

“Palestinians have had to evacuate their sick, disabled and wounded in a forced march from the North to the South –– and then again from the South onwards –– dragging hospital beds behind cars, pushing wheelchairs, raising them on makeshift stretchers, or simply carrying them in their arms.”

Those hospitals which are still functioning are described as scenes from a “horror movie.” The critical shortages of staff and supplies –– including anaesthetics, analgesics, medicine and disinfectants –– have led not only to otherwise unnecessary amputations of limbs, but also to amputations without anaesthesia, often undertaken by flashlight. Pregnant women are also being subjected to caesareans without anaesthetic. Patients are being treated on dirty floors covered with blood, with family members having to stand holding saline bags, where saline is even available. There are insufficient staff and resources for adequate wound or post-operative wound care: unclean wounds –– often infested with worms and flies –– rapidly become infected, necrotic or gangrenous. Patients plead for food and water. Even basic pain-management treatment is often unavailable, and patients are at risk of dying from treatable conditions.


Not to mention the hundreds of thousands of Gazans who still need routine medical care for chronic conditions but are now deprived of that care. And the more than 360,000 documented cases of communicable diseases in UNRWA shelters alone, brought on by unsanitary conditions, hunger and lack of clean water.

7. Destruction of Palestinian life in Gaza

On November 16, 15 UN Special Rapporteurs and 21 members of UN Working Groups observed that the level of destruction that had by then taken place of “housing units, as well as hospitals, schools, mosques, bakeries, water pipes, sewage and electricity networks . . . threatens to make the continuation of Palestinian life in Gaza impossible.”

As the South African Application describes:

Israel has destroyed not only individual homes, houses, and whole apartment blocks; it has destroyed entire streets, and entire neighbourhoods. It has targeted the foundational civil system in Gaza. Israel has targeted the Palace of Justice — the main Palestinian court building in Gaza — housing the Palestinian Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, the Court of Appeal, the Court of First Instance, the Administrative Court and the Magistrates’ Court, as well as an archive of court records and other historical files. Israel has also significantly damaged the Palestinian Legislative Council complex. It has targeted Gaza City’s Central Archive building, containing thousands of historical documents and national records dating back over 100 years, and forming an essential archive of Palestinian history, as well as more modern records for Gaza City’s urban development. Israel has left Gaza City’s main public library in ruins. It has also damaged or destroyed countless bookshops, publishing houses, libraries, and hundreds of educational facilities. Israel has targeted every one of Gaza’s four universities — including the Islamic University of Gaza, the oldest higher education institution in the territory, which has trained generations of doctors and engineers, amongst others — destroying campuses for the education of future generations of Palestinians in Gaza. Alongside so many others, Israel has killed leading Palestinian academics, including: Professor Sufian Tayeh, the President of the Islamic University — an award-winning physicist and UNESCO Chair of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Space Sciences in Palestine — who died, alongside his family, in an airstrike; Dr Ahmed Hamdi Abo Absa, Dean of the Software Engineering Department at the University of Palestine, reportedly shot dead by Israeli soldiers as he walked away, having been released from three days of enforced disappearance; and Professor Muhammad Eid Shabir, Professor of Immunology and Virology, and former President of the Islamic University of Gaza, and Professor Refaat Alareer, poet and Professor of Comparative Literature and Creative Writing at the Islamic University of Gaza, were both killed by Israel with members of their families.

Israel has damaged and destroyed numerous centres of Palestinian learning and culture, including: the Al Zafar Dmari Mosque and Center for Manuscripts and Ancient Documents; the Orthodox Cultural Centre; the Al Qarara Cultural Museum; the Gaza Centre for Culture and Arts; the Arab Social Cultural Centre; the Hakawi Society for Culture and Arts; and the Rafah Museum — Gaza’s newly opened museum of Palestinian heritage, housing hundreds of cultural and archaeological artefacts. Israel’s attacks have destroyed Gaza’s ancient history: eight sites have been damaged or destroyed, including the ancient port of Gaza (known as ‘Anthedon Harbour’ or ‘Al Balakhiya’) — the archaeological site of a 2,000-year-old Roman cemetery listed on both the Islamic Heritage List and the tentative UNESCO World Heritage List. Israel has also destroyed Gaza City’s ‘Old City’, including its 146-year-old historic houses, mosques, churches, markets and schools. It has also destroyed Gaza’s more recent history of more hopeful times, including the Rashad al-Shawa Cultural Center — site of a historic meeting between United States President Bill Clinton and Palestinian President Yasser Arafat 25 years ago — and an important cultural hub for Palestinians in Gaza, with its theatre, library and event space. And Israel is destroying Gaza’s future academic and cultural potential: alongside the 352 Palestinian schools it has damaged or destroyed, the 4,037 students and 209 teachers and educational staff it has killed, alongside the other 7,259 students and 619 teachers it has injured.

Israel has damaged or destroyed an estimated 318 Muslim and Christian religious sites, demolishing the places where Palestinians have worshipped for generations. Along with its destruction of the physical monuments to the history and heritage of the Palestinians in Gaza, Israel has sought to destroy the very Palestinian people who form and create that heritage: Gaza’s celebrated journalists, its teachers, intellectuals and public figures, its doctors and nurses, its film-makers, writers and singers, the directors and deans of its universities, the heads of its hospitals, its eminent scientists, linguists, playwrights, novelists, artists and musicians. Israel has killed and is killing Palestinian story-tellers and poets, Palestinian farmers and fishermen, alongside Gaza’s local legends, including 84- year-old Elham Farah, from one of Palestine’s oldest Christian families — a reputed accordionist and music teacher, known as ‘Mother Orange’ to generations of Palestinian music students for her shock of red hair, — shot dead by an Israeli sniper outside the Holy Family Church in Gaza City when she returned home for warm clothes, and was left to bleed to death.

Just as Israel is destroying the official memory and records of Palestinians in Gaza through its destruction of Gaza’s archives and landmarks, it is obliterating Palestinian personal lives and private memories, histories and futures, through bombing and bulldozing graveyards, destroying family records and photographs, wiping out entire multigenerational families, and killing, maiming and traumatising a generation of children.

The Israeli army [] is destroying the very fabric and basis of Palestinian life in Gaza. Israel is thereby deliberately inflicting on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life calculated to bring about its destruction.


8. Imposing measures intended to prevent Palestinian births

More than 50,000 pregnant Gazan women give birth each month. Now these pregnant woman and their newborn babies are displaced, lack access to food and water, shelter, clothes, hygiene and sanitation and lack of access to health services. Doctors are having to perform ordinarily unnecessary hysterectomies on young women who “bleed out” after giving birth in order to save their lives, leaving them unable to have more children. Newborns up to three months old are dying of diarrhea, hypothermia and other preventable causes. Without essential equipment and medical support, premature and underweight babies have little to no chance of survival.

The relief sought

After its detailed recitation of the evidence of the Jewish State’s genocidal acts and intent, South Africa asks the ICJ to declare that Israel has breached its obligations as a State Party to the Genocide Convention by committing genocide in relation to Palestinians in Gaza; that Israel must cease forthwith all its genocidal acts; ensure that all persons committing, conspiring, attempting, inciting, or complicit in them are punished by Israeli or international tribunals; collect and conserve the evidence of genocide; perform the obligations of reparation in the interest of Palestinian victims, such as allowing the safe and dignified return of forcibly displaced or abducted Palestinians to their homes and providing for the reconstruction of what it has destroyed in Gaza; and offer assurances and guarantees of non-repetition of its Convention violations.

Request for “Provisional Measures”

In light of the “ongoing, extreme and irreparable harm being suffered by Palestinians in Gaza” and the flagrancy of Israel’s violations of the Genocide Convention, the Application requests the preliminary relief of “Provisional Measures” under ICJ Rules and precedent that permit such measures when at least some of the genocidal acts alleged are “capable of falling within the provisions” of the Convention. South Africa argues that the mass killing, the serious bodily and mental harm imposed, the deliberate infliction of conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, and the imposition of measures intended to prevent births within the group, all qualify.

According to South Africa, previous decisions of the ICJ in Croatia’s and Bosnia’s genocide cases against Serbia have held that methods of physical destruction other than killing, employed to seek the death of the members of the group, are “capable of falling within the Convention’s provisions.” These include deprivation of food, medical care, shelter or clothing, lack of hygiene, systematic expulsion from homes, or exhaustion as a result of physical exertion, subjecting the group to a subsistence diet; failing to provide for adequate medical care, and generally creating circumstances that would lead to a slow death, such as the lack of proper food, water, shelter, clothing and sanitation. The facts detailed in South Africa’s Application support its contention that Israel has employed all these methods of physical destruction and will likely continue to do so.

If the Court agrees, it could order significant preliminary relief before the case comes on for hearing on the merits of South Africa’s claims.

ICJ jurisdiction

This case comes to the ICJ under its “Contentious Case” jurisdiction, which permits it to entertain a dispute between two UN member states who are also parties to a treaty containing a provision whereby, in the event of a disagreement over the interpretation or application of the treaty, one of them may refer the dispute to the Court. South Africa and Israel are both UN members and parties to the Genocide Convention, Article IX of which provides that disputes between Contracting Parties relating to its interpretation, application or fulfilment, including the responsibility of a State for genocide, shall be submitted to the ICJ at the request of any of the parties to the dispute. South Africa recites that it has repeatedly made clear to Israel since October 30 that its actions in Gaza constitute genocide, most formally and directly by sending a “Note Verbale” on December 21 to the Israeli Embassy in South Africa. On November 17, South Africa was one of five nations to refer the genocide question to the International Criminal Court. Although Israel has not responded to the Note Verbale, its public rejection of any suggestion that its attacks on Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide, or that Israel has violated its obligations under the Convention, serves, under the Court’s statute and case law, to establish, in South Africa’s view, a cognizable “dispute” over the interpretation and application of the Convention, and the Court’s jurisdiction to hear and decide it. It appears to be a strong argument for jurisdiction, and Israel’s initial statement, while brief and preliminary, challenged South Africa’s claims as “baseless” on the merits but did not appear to contest the Court’s jurisdiction.

The #genocide case brought by South Africa in the @CIJ_ICJ is an important first step. But the genocide will not end until the perpetrators are arrested & tried for their crimes & the #apartheid regime is ended & replaced with a system of #equality & #HumanRights.#Palestine

— Craig Mokhiber (@CraigMokhiber) January 6, 2024

Potential outcomes and implications

With respect to the merits, South Africa’s lawyers have made a compelling case of Israel’s genocidal acts and intent, and for the preliminary relief sought. South Africa is not alone. The Presidents or other state officials of Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, Honduras, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Pakistan, Syria, Turkiye, Tunisia, and Venezuela – all State Parties to the Genocide Convention – have, according to the Application, described or referred to Israel’s actions as genocide. They might lend support to South Africa’s case before the ICJ.

As a member of the UN, Israel has an obligation to comply with the judgment of the ICJ in any “contentious case” to which it is a party. If it fails to do so, resort may be had to the Security Council, which can decide upon measures to be taken to give effect to the judgment. Of course, the United States has often protected Israel in the Security Council with its veto before and may well do so again in the event of preliminary Provisional Measures or a merits judgment adverse to Israel. To be sure, Israel ignored the Court’s 2004 non-binding advisory opinion that the separation wall was illegal, issued under its “Advisory Proceedings” jurisdiction. But that was different from the binding judgment that Israel may face here under the Court’s “Contentious Case” jurisdiction. And that was a wall. Genocide just might be different, especially if the Judgment is unanimous and as well documented and reasoned as South Africa’s Application.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:40 pm

Update on Palestine: IDF Claims Gaza City Victory

ImageSIMPLICIUS THE THINKER
JAN 7, 2024

Today Israel announced that they have finally taken “full control” over Gaza City—the northern and most populous portion of the Gaza Strip. Naturally, they erected a giant menorah and Israeli flag in the center: (Videos at link.)

Image

I remain skeptical of their claims, but we’ll indulge them at face value for the sake of the report. Even if they did manage to fully secure it, keep in mind it has now taken nearly three months to capture a territory the size of the small red speck inside the Gaza Strip seen below juxtaposed within Ukraine for comparison:

Image

The “world’s most advanced military” took three months to manage a claimed capture of that while fighting a completely technologically outmatched foe who they outnumber 500k to ~10k.

The IDF also has now used this capture as excuse to explain the dismissal of several top brigades to the rear for reconstitution. Instead of being made combat ineffective, the line is now that they have valiantly completed their mission and are taking a rest. They claim that in capturing Gaza City, they have eliminated 8000 Hamas fighters. However, John Kirby himself appears dubious regarding this, as he implies that Hamas has not been measurably attrited: (Video at link.)

Netanyahu is again agitating for war with Lebanon next. In the meantime, radical Israeli politicians continue pushing for the total ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Most alarming is the fact that they are basing their policies on the alleged popular support amongst Israeli society for same. Here’s Likud party and Knesset member Moshe Saada openly stating that the people in the streets, the Kibbutz-dwellers, etc., are all shouting in unision: “Annihilate them (Gazans).” (Video at link.)

And here is the Israeli ambassador to the UK just nonchalantly admitting that all of Gaza must be destroyed: (Video at link.)

Where does such inhuman barbarity stem from, you wonder? I believe it is a case of simple unrestrained human nature. Those who’ve read books like Lord of the Flies know that humans can very quickly devolve into quite immoral, depraved, and Machiavellian brutes if there are no checks in place to restrain some of human nature’s darker impulses. You see, it’s not that all humans are necessarily mindlessly depraved by nature per se, but rather that it’s very easy to set off a cascade event of unethical behavior when only a small pilot group initiates it.

Think of baseball, boxing, or any sport in general. It takes only one guy to be juiced up on steroids to create a cascade that sees the entire league begin juicing due to the power creep nature of the realization that if you don’t do this too, you won’t be able to compete. Likewise, in an environment where there are no restraints, a small ‘contagion’ of bad behavior can set off a chain reaction as it spreads to others by a variety of vectors.

How does all this pertain to the utterly breathtaking criminality and inhumanly racist hatred seen in the Israeli society toward the Palestinians? For a long time now criticism of anything remotely related to Israel or Jewish-ness was highly verboten due to the black mark of “anti-Semitism” being cast against anyone who dared criticize their actions. In the same sort of way that the modern liberal movement has created blowback in the form of liberal fragility and the complete inability to debate or face facts, nor take any criticism whatsoever—a fact we see often, as liberals melt down into fits of feral screaming or crying when refuted by reality—the modern Israeli state, its inhabitants, and proponents likewise have never had to deal with genuine structured criticism because the West has generally been so obsequiously permissive toward it. Most importantly: they’ve never had to deal with accountability.

Israel can be viewed like one of those overly-pampered babies—the golden calf of the family—which never hears the word ‘no’ and whose every squall brings mommy dashing over to immediately coddle it. Israel has carried out terror and crimes for decades that any other country in the world would have been immediately reproached, condemned, and sanctioned for. This has created a sense of unparalleled historical entitlement and exceptionalism in Israeli society such that they feel no qualms whatsoever about glibly and openly calling for genocide. In any other society, it would not only make instant headlines but would make the top docket at the UN human rights council meetings. But in Israel, you can call for genocide, you can demean the Palestinians with open racism as Israeli TV so often does, and it doesn’t get so much as a passing glance or shrug.

Some consider such a viewpoint to be “anti-Semitic”, but there are two things to consider:

The Palestinians are the original Semitic people of the region. There is in fact nothing in the world more pro-Semitic than such views.

Most worldwide Jews appear to be in support of Palestine and are becoming increasingly anti-Zionist. I don’t know what the actual statistics are, and would be interested to see them. But even much of Israeli society is now openly rebuking the IDF, thus making the hateful portion of the population the true anti-Semites.

The last point obviously goes to show that not all of Israel can be characterized in such a negatively broad stroke. But of course the highly vocal and radicalized segment of it which are the bad seeds still account for such a staunch amount of violent racism and pro-genocide views that it still justifies the earlier characterizations.

As I said, when left to their devices, when a people’s most cruel and malign inclinations are left totally unchecked without any pushback or repudiation, it creates an enabling effect that essentially communicates to those people: “Keep going, what you’re doing is totally normal and acceptable.” Israel has been the favored son for so long, its most transgressive acts ignored and tacitly allowed for such a length of time, that it has simply developed a natural sense of entitlement and divine exceptionalism. Now, when the world suddenly stands up to it for the first time, Israel is dumbstruck with feigned shock like a child caught with its hand in the cookie jar.

This is not to say Israeli people are somehow bad by nature or genetically. No, just like the current Ukrainians, Israelis are to an extent being used by western colonialist powers. And in order for their colonialist-outpost to thrive, the powers that be must ensure that the puppet state has full immunity from any sort of accusations of wrongdoing or prosecutorial blowback. This is why Ukrainians are given full sanction to be Nazis and commit mass murder and genocide on Donbass, and it is why Israelis get the same allowance. It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with great power politics and how colonialist outposts are conditioned and molded in order to further the geopolitical ends and interests of their sponsors.

Now, the coordinated narrative has turned to finding a new home for ethnically cleansed Gazans, as we long predicted here from the literal outset of the conflict. They are couching this with standard imperial terminology, calling it “humanitarian emigration”.

Image

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_ ... emigrants/
Here the Israeli finance minister underlines how Gaza must be cleansed: (Video at link.)

Did you catch that at the end?

Once again in totally choreographed fashion, he states this “humanitarian solution” must be enacted to save Gazans. Yes, the Israeli “final solution” but in “humanitarian” robes.

On cue, Nikki Haley follows the directive in her new interview, shockingly openly calling for ethnic cleansing: (Video at link.)


In fact, her statement is extremely anti-Semitic against Palestinians because she uses subtly coded pre-genocide language to dehumanize Palestinian civilians as ‘Hamas’ operatives and, by extension, “terrorists”—eligible for legal elimination, it is to be inferred. This is a highly dangerous anti-Semitic trope used by racist Zionists in recent videos where they have attributed “all Palestinians” to be either Hamas or Hamas-“affiliated” in order to justify their calls for genocide against them.

For instance from today: (Video at link.)

Note how the anti-Semite above considers all Palestinian children to be guilty by association in order to excuse her warped genocidal fantasies.

In the same vein, Nikki Haley’s call to relocate all Gazans into “Hamas” countries is clearly an attempt to subconsciously link innocent civilians to ‘terrorism’. And that’s of course besides the fact that she’s openly calling for ethnic cleansing of an entire population, which is a crime against humanity, and goes against every international law—except the western Luciferian “Rule of Law”.

Now it’s been reported that Israel is attempting to force friendly countries to pressure South Africa’s judges who have filed a genocide case in the international court at the Hague against Israel:

Image
https://www.commondreams.org/news/israe ... a-genocide

According to a cable obtained by Axios, the Israeli Foreign Ministry is calling on the country's embassies to pressure host country diplomats and political leaders to swiftly issue an "immediate and unequivocal statement along the following lines: To publicly and clearly state that YOUR COUNTRY rejects the outrage[ous], absurd, and baseless allegations made against Israel."

The cable warns that "a ruling by the court could have significant potential implications that are not only in the legal world but have practical bilateral, multilateral, economic, security ramifications." Israel is seeking to prevent an injunction ordering the country to suspend its attack on Gaza.


That’s not to mention the fact that members of Israeli Knesset’s own pro-Arab Hadash-Ta’al political party have joined in on the lawsuit for the Hague, according to Jerusalem Post:

Image

But Israel’s plan appears to amount to this: slow-roll the operation while desperately searching the globe for a place willing to have Gazans offloaded onto it. We’ve seen Congo in discussion, with Haley bringing up Qatar, Iran, Turkey, etc.—all prima facie non-serious suggestions.

Israel officials have clearly signaled that they intend to occupy Gaza, and Netanyahu just this week reiterated that they will “not stop the war” until all objectives are reached.

By the way, as a slightly tangential note, here’s Israeli ambassador Mark Regev openly admitting that we haven’t seen a single killed Hamas fighter—yet preposterously attributing this to the fact that “Hamas controls all images out of Gaza”: (Video at link.)

How does that make any sense? Does Hamas control all the IDF bodycams and endless videos that Israeli soldiers have released of themselves romping through Gaza? How is Hamas behind the fact that the IDF itself has not shown us a single eliminated Hamas militant? What does this really tell us about how many “Hamas fighters” the inept IDF has actually “eliminated”?

This is the same individual who said with a straight face that it’s a lie to claim Israel has killed a single Palestinian child: (Video at link.)

This is how immorally and reprehensibly sick a government can become when it is given unfettered moral license to act as it pleases without any international accountability whatsoever.

Image

You don’t say?

One of the consequences of all this is the Biden administration has become divided like never before. Yesterday we learned that Raytheon Lloyd was hospitalized in intensive care for days without the president’s knowledge:

Image

The United States of America, at a time of historic international upheaval and danger to ‘American interests’ abroad, was functionally without a Secretary of Defense for almost a week without the commander-in-chief’s knowledge. Some assumed Austen’s deputy Kathleen Hicks would take over—except she was on ‘vacation’ in Puerto Rico at the time. How convenient!

It ties into the Israeli situation because rumors have it disgruntled White House staffers were responsible for hiding the information from Biden over his contentious stance on Palestine—another case of open rebellion, if true. It once more highlights the deepening rifts within the corrupt and beleaguered Biden administration.

As to Lloyd’s “minor elective procedure”—which appeared to leave him comatose for nearly an entire week—there’s no definitive word. But some suspect it may have been an emergency surgical extraction of an uncashed Raytheon kickback from his netherside.

Image



As a parting item, enjoy this song by a Palestinian girl named Nour, who sings beautifully about the Arab nations abandoning Palestine:
(Video at link.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/upd ... laims-gaza

SIMPLICIUS drops the ball on so-called 'human nature', which is no fixed thing but the result of the social, and to lesser degree natural environment. We are social, learning animals, not insects, which is where Wilson screwed up. What next, original sin?

******

Israel Seen as Even More Likely to Launch War with Lebanon as Fate of ICJ Suit Uncertain Due to China and Russia Doubts
Posted on January 8, 2024 by Yves Smith

Events have gotten ahead of my drafting. I planned to launch at the customary before 7 AM East Coast time, when news is breaking that Israel is indeed attacking Lebanon, even as Tony Blinken was set to visit today…..as you will see below, to talk Israel out of this sort of thing. So unless the latest salvo can be depicted as proportionate to the strike on Mount Hermon (more on that soon), we may be seeing the start of an Israel war with Lebanon:


Back to the earlier text:

It seems important to keep the focus the escalating Israeli war against Palestinians, more than this humble site can do via its Links feature alone. But at the same time, the conflict has moved into a Grand Guignol phase, where there are so many daily horrors that fall into established patterns that it becomes hard to keep track individually, with the cumulative effect numbing.

Being outraged, even if you could maintain the choler, seems inadequate compared to the viciousness of Israel’s campaign and the despicable glee way too many Israeli officials and members of the public exhibit. And the usual relief valve of writing Congresscritters is so clearly pointless as to confirm the sense of futility in the face of this smug savagery.1

Despite the appearance of a horrible sameness, pressures are building, at the presumed Israel assassination of Hamas leaders, notably deputy chief Saleh al-Arouri, in Beirut attest. Hezbollah responded, as promised, by taking out a major Israeli electronic surveillance post near the Lebanon border, at Mount Hermon. The Times of Israel reported that the IDF admitted to damage to the “air traffic control” site. Defense Security Asia was more descriptive:

Hezbollah launched a barrage of more than 60 rockets at the Meron military base situated atop Mount Jarmak in northern occupied Palestine, one of the most crucial military installations belonging to Israel Defense Force (IDF),

The IDF’s Meron base is regarded by observers as one of the most critical Israeli military installations with Israel’s high-ranking military leaders are known to frequent the base for operational command.

The rocket attack on this significant Israeli military facility commenced at 8 am local time and lasted for several hours.

Similarly:


This weekend, Tony Blinken engaged in yet another Middle East tour, allegedly to try to prevent an escalation of the war, revealing US impotence, complicity, and cowardice. It’s hard to take American finger-wagging and empty virtue-signaling seriously. As an example, the BBC reported Palestinians must be able to stay in Gaza – Blinken. From the article:

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken says Palestinians must not be pressured into leave Gaza, and must be allowed to return to their homes once conditions allow.

Mr Blinken condemned statements by some Israeli ministers, who called for the resettlement of Palestinians elsewhere.

The US official was in Qatar on his latest Middle East tour.

His comments come following reports that dozens of people were killed at a refugee camp in northern Gaza.

Footage from Jabalia shows bodies lying in the rubble of a destroyed building – many of them women and children.

Blinken must believe everyone in the Middle East is a fool to try that sort of thing with a straight face. So why is Israel still destroying hospitals? Still killing civilians willy-nilly, actively though strikes and more passively through starvation and disease, the latest being a Covid outbreak? So yes, they get to stay and die in place due to US inaction.

A new piece the Washington Post describes how the US is worried about Israel broadcasting plans to expand the conflict…even as Blinken is making his tour to try to get Middle Eastern leader to exercise restraint. A cynic might wonder if this was intended to assist Israel in its next phase. It’s not as if Israel’s intent to take the conflict to Lebanon were a secret. Alastair Crooke has been discussing it for over a month, based on public statements by Israeli leaders to clear Lebanon near the border so as to calm the nerves of settlers and facilitate their return. From the Post:

In private conversations, the administration has warned Israel against a significant escalation in Lebanon. If it were to do so, a new secret assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) found that it will be difficult for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to succeed because its military assets and resources would be spread too thin…

An aside: Scott Ritter has reported that Israel lost its two previous war games agains Hamas and Hezbollah, even with US assistance, so this inability is hardly news. The one thing that Israel has going for it, as Ritter and more explicitly Aurelien (in comments) pointed out is that Lebanon as a country is in terrible shape and the last thing they need is a war. So despite Hezbollah being in better fighting form than it was in 2006 and beat Israel in the end, the broader societal costs are dangerously high. The flip side is Alexander Mercouris has argued that countries that win wars, even with great loss of manpower and infrastructure, emerge stronger. But is Lebanon, even if it were to march into and hold Galilee, too close to being a failed state for that to apply?

Back to the Post:

Secretary of State Antony Blinken is set to arrive Monday in Israel, where he will discuss specific steps to “avoid escalation,” his spokesman Matthew Miller said before boarding a plane to the Middle East.

“It is in no one’s interest — not Israel’s, not the region’s, not the world’s — for this conflict to spread beyond Gaza,” Miller said. But that view is not uniformly held within Israel’s government.
Since Hamas’s October assault, Israeli officials have discussed launching a preemptive attack on Hezbollah, U.S. officials said. That prospect has faced sustained U.S. opposition because of the likelihood it would draw Iran, which supports both groups, and other proxy forces into the conflict — an eventuality that could compel the United States to respond militarily on Israel’s behalf.

Officials fear that a full-scale conflict between Israel and Lebanon would surpass the bloodshed of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war on account of Hezbollah’s substantially larger arsenal of long-range and precision weaponry. “The number of casualties in Lebanon could be anywhere from 300,000 to 500,000 and entail a massive evacuation of all of northern Israel,” said Bilal Saab, a Lebanon expert at the Middle East Institute, a Washington think tank.

Hezbollah may strike deeper into Israel than before, hitting sensitive targets like petrochemical plants and nuclear reactors, and Iran may activate militias across the region. “I don’t think it would be limited to these two antagonists,” he said.

The Post also reports that Israel was itching to attack Lebanon shortly after the October 7 Hamas raid, based on the view that an uptick in Hebollah strikes into the Israel border area (which I understand normally are at a low level, tit-for-tat basis). The US was so concerned that the article says Blinken was calling Israel three times a day to try to deter them. So apparently Blinken is not completely useless.

The Cradle, in West scrambles to deter Israel from war on Lebanon, added:

EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell visited Lebanon on Sunday to meet with top Hezbollah officials, while the top US diplomat, Antony Blinken, is set to travel to Tel Aviv for talks with the Israeli leadership on Monday.

Borrell met with the leader of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc in Lebanon, Mohammad Raad, whose son, a Hezbollah fighter, was killed in an Israeli strike on a home in southern Lebanon in November…

However, Blinken recently used emergency authorization to bypass the US Congress and send additional munitions to Israel that would be crucial in any broader war with Hezbollah. Blinken and others in the White House have repeatedly said they would put “no red lines” on Israel’s use of US weapons despite widespread accusations that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.

The Houthis in Yemen are standing fast to their demand that they will interfere with shipping to and from Israel until the genocide stops. Maritime Executive reports that “international coalition forces” prevented two Houthi attacks on Saturday. But as I read it, one “attack” was a single drone, which seems inadequate to amount to an attack. Perhaps a surveillance device? Or an isolated drone to get the Western ships to waste a missile or two?

But to a so-far apparently neglected issue about the pending International Court of Justice case filed by South Africa contesting Israel’s genocide weirdly is how the case will be decided. Israel is in a lather about the filing and has been having its ambassadors exert pressure (how exactly?) for various states to make declarations opposing the South Africa case. There has mainly been a dearth of official pronouncements, although Bolivia has announced it is supporting South Africa’s claim. It turns out that sort of thing matters because the vote process is political.

Below Norman Finkelstein counts noses as to which states acting as judges are likely to vote. His discussion is short but the bottom line is for South Africa to prevail on this action, it needs 8 of 15 votes. So an abstention amounts to a vote for Israel. (Video at link.)


Finkelstein contends that Israel is likely to win because Russia’s and China’s votes against Israel are almost certain to be necessary for South Africa to prevail. Finkelstein argues neither will want to support the South Africa case because the same genocide convention being used against South Africa could be turned on them. I see Russia as separately likely to abstain due to Putin’s past support of Israel.

But if this is how the votes wind up breaking, it would seriously call into question the BRICS talking point of BRICS being more virtuous than the old colonizers. Upstanding conduct and being a global power do not mix well.

____

1 Writing to the press might not be quite as pointless, given that they are smaller organizations than governments and are not used to receiving a raft of letters critical of their coverage. An obvious point of entry is their silence about the systematic murder of journalists.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01 ... oubts.html

*******

Hezbollah commander killed in Israeli strike

The conflict continues to escalate in southern Lebanon as Israel pushes for a wider war

News Desk

JAN 8, 2024

Image
Mourners are seen at the funeral procession of a Hezbollah fighter who was killed in clashes with Israel. (Photo credit: dpa)

An Israeli strike on south Lebanon on 8 January killed a senior Hezbollah commander, three security sources told Reuters.

The security sources identified him as Wissam al-Tawil, the deputy head of a unit within Hezbollah's elite Radwan force. He and another Hezbollah fighter were killed when their car was hit in a strike on the southern Lebanese village of Khirbet Selm.

"This is a very painful strike," one of the security sources claimed to Reuters. Another said, "Things will flare up now."

The attack comes after Israel escalated the conflict by assassinating a top Hamas leader, Saleh al-Arouri, and six other Hamas members in airstrikes in the Beirut suburb of Dahiyeh last week.

Hezbollah responded on 6 January by firing 62 rockets at Israel's Meron base, its primary security and military command center for aerial warfare and intelligence on the northern front.

Following his assassination by "Israel" this morning in the south of #Lebanon, the #Lebanese Islamic Resistance announced leader Wissam Hassan Al-Tawil as a martyr of the path to Al-Quds.

The martyr was assassinated by an Israeli strike while he was driving his car in the… pic.twitter.com/5HLTwGiiVq

— Al Mayadeen English (@MayadeenEnglish) January 8, 2024


Israeli attacks in southern Lebanon have killed more than 130 Hezbollah fighters and 28 Lebanese civilians since the war began on 7 October. Another 19 Hezbollah fighters have been killed in Syria.

Hezbollah says it has caused approximately 2,000 casualties (dead and wounded) among Israeli forces.

Residents in Israel's northern settlements and southern Lebanese towns near the border have been forced to evacuate amid the fighting.

In recent days, Israeli officials have escalated their rhetoric regarding a possible full-scale war in Lebanon.

"We prefer the path of an agreed-upon diplomatic settlement," Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said Friday, "but we are getting close to the point where the hourglass will turn over."

Hezbollah's Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah warned Israel in a televised address on 5 January not to launch a full-scale war on Lebanon.

"Whoever thinks of war with us – in one word, he will regret it," Nasrallah said.

The head of the pro-Hezbollah ‘Loyalty to the Resistance’ bloc in the Lebanese parliament, Mohammad Raad, emphasized: "We do not want the war to expand, but we do want the aggression to stop. No one discusses anything related to our Lebanese arena with us before the enemy ends its aggression."

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/hezbo ... eli-strike

China's COSCO halts shipping to Israeli ports: Israeli media

Yemen's Ansarallah-led government has attacked ships headed to Israeli ports in response to Israel's brutal war on Gaza

News Desk

JAN 7, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: COSCO)

Chinese state-owned shipping company COSCO, the fourth largest in the world, has halted sailing to Israeli ports, Israeli media outlet Globes reported on 7 January, in the wake of attacks and attempted seizures of vessels heading to Israel via the Red Sea by Yemeni armed forces.

The Israeli report indicated that the Chinese firm did not disclose a reason for the policy change. COSCO's offices in Israel have refused to comment on the development.

The Globes report attributed the decision to the close ties between China and Iran, which sells 90 percent of its crude oil exports to Beijing. Iran is a supporter of the Yemeni government and opposes Israel's ongoing war on Gaza.

In a similar development, the Hong Kong-based OOCL halted all cargo deliveries to Israel last month, citing “operational problems.”

In the same month, other major shipping firms, including the Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and CMA CGM, announced their decision to halt shipments to Israel one day after the Yemeni Armed Forces attacked two Israel-bound vessels.

Yemeni forces have been attacking Israeli-bound vessels in the Red Sea in response to Israel's war on Gaza, which the Sanaa government views as genocide.

Washington and its allies in turn formed the Prosperity Guardian naval coalition and issued an ultimatum to Yemen's Ansarallah-led government to stop their Red Sea operations or suffer the “consequences."

Yemen's actions have forced numerous leading shipping companies to instead travel around the Cape of Good Hope at the southern tip of Africa to reach Europe, extending the shipping times by two weeks and increasing costs.

On 31 December, US naval forces sank three Yemeni boats in the Red Sea, killing ten Yemeni naval soldiers.

From the onset of the Gaza conflict on 7 October, Yemeni military forces have targeted a minimum of 15 merchant vessels either bound for Israeli harbors or owned by entities associated with Israel.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/china ... aeli-media

A call for arms: Countering US military aid to Israel

Formidable US military assistance to Israel will always demand a regional reaction. In this case, it has driven the Resistance Axis to establish an irregular military counterbalance, an essential move to ensure the stability of West Asia.


Mohamad Hasan Sweidan

JAN 8, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Late last year, Israel's Ministry of Finance unveiled the country's anticipated budget for 2024, revealing a noteworthy development. The proposed budget called for a substantial $8.3 billion increase in defense spending, projecting a historic high of approximately $37 billion for the occupation state's armed forces. This marks a significant surge in military expenditure, positioning Israel among the top-tier states globally in terms of military budget allocations.

Rank Country Value of military
expenditure (billion $)
1 United States 877
2 China 292
3 Russia 86
4 India 81
5 Saudi Arabia 75
6 United Kingdom 68
7 Germany 56
8 France 54
9 South Korea 46
10 Japan 46
11 Ukraine 44
12 Italy 33
13 Australia 32
14 Canada 27
15 Israel 23
As of 2022, Israel already ranked among the top 15 countries with the highest military spending worldwide. When taking into consideration military spending as a percentage of GDP, Israel secured the ninth spot globally.

A key factor influencing Israel's supposed military prowess is its status as the largest recipient of US military aid. Since 1946, Washington has provided an enormous $263 billion in support, with approximately $130 billion allocated for addressing evolving security threats and enhancing Israel's capabilities. This aid, including joint exercises and cooperation, plays a crucial role in maintaining Tel Aviv's qualitative military edge.

Arab Allies, Israeli Arms

In 2023, the US bolstered its commitment with a record-breaking $3.8 billion in military funding to Israel, part of a $38 billion deal spanning a decade. Additionally, the European Parent Command maintains war reserves within Israel, fortifying its defenses in times of significant military emergencies.

There are ten defense cooperation agreements between the US and Israel today, including the Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement (1952), the Public Information Security Agreement (1982), the Mutual Logistics Support Agreement (1991), the Status of Forces Agreement (1994), and the Memorandum of Understanding on Counterterrorism and Research and Development (2005).

Beyond receiving unparalleled military funding, Israel occupies the tenth position in the global arms export arena, contributing 2.3 percent of the world's total arms exports from 2018-2022 to reach an unprecedented $12.5 billion in exports in 2022.

Arab states who normalized relations with Tel Aviv through the 2020 Abraham Accords, have emerged as substantial importers of Israeli arms, marking a paradigm shift in regional dynamics. The three Arab countries, the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco, which signed the US-brokered normalization agreement, accounted for 24 percent of Israeli arms sales in 2022, up from 7 percent in 2021.

Image

In terms of military reserves, Israel ranks 13th globally, boasting 465,000 soldiers in its reserve ranks. Around 5 percent of the Israeli population serves as army reserves, making it the third-highest percentage globally.

Image

Global share of major arms exports by top 10 exporters, 2018-2022
Israel in the US defense budget for 2024

On 22 December, President Joe Biden signed the National Defense Authorization Act, allocating $886.3 billion to the 2024 defense budget, a $28 billion increase from the previous fiscal year.

Notably, the budget received praise from Israeli quarters for its generous provisions, including $500 million for missile defense cooperation, encompassing Israel’s Iron Dome systems, the David Slingshot, and research and testing programs. It also allocates $47.5 million to "new cooperation between the United States and Israel on emerging defense technologies," including artificial intelligence and cybersecurity. The new budget increased funding to combat drones by almost 40 percent to $55 million from $40 million and also extended the US-Israel cooperation program to combat tunneling until 2026.


Country Reserves Population
(in million) Reserve percentage of the population

Finland 900000 5.541 16.24%
Taiwan 1500000 23.57 6.36%
Israel 465000 9.364 4.97%
Vietnam 2500000 97.47 2.56%
North Korea 600000 25.97 2.31%
Colombia 845000 51.52 1.64%
South Korea 500000 51.74 0.96%
Brazil 1340000 214.3 0.63%
Egypt 480000 109.3 0.44%
Pakistan 550000 231.4 0.23%
India 1155000 1408 0.08%
China 510000 1412 0.04%

The 2024 budget extends support for strategic initiatives, such as training Israeli pilots, enhancing maritime domain awareness, and continuing the US-Israel cooperation program to combat tunneling over the next two years. Furthermore, the appointment of a presidential envoy for the Abraham Accords and the Negev Forum initiative underscores Washington’s relentless pursuit of West Asian subjugation to its interests.

Other key items include:

Extension of the Defense Department's (DoD) authority to transfer weapons systems to Israel under the Israel War Reserve Stockpile Authority (WRSA-I) until January 2027. Extending the authority of the DoD to transfer precision-guided munitions to Israel.
Training Israeli pilots to operate KC-46s.
Directing the DoD to develop a strategy to improve integrated maritime domain awareness and interception capabilities to counter maritime threats against Israel.


Deterrence balance

So how do neighboring countries respond to Israel's formidable military arsenal, with its American uber-benefactor ever-ready to replenish its stocks and advance its qualitative edge? Clearly, regional states will seek to redress any imbalance by enhancing their own military capabilities in order to maintain both deterrence and stability.

But the disparity in US military aid to Israel and its neighbors is an ominous reminder that Washington seeks, above all, to ensure there is no such “balance.”

Between 2006 and 2018, Washington allocated a mere $1.28 billion in military assistance to the Lebanese army, averaging a meager $100 million annually. This clearly pales in comparison to the tens of billions directed towards Israel during the same period.

Moreover, Washington has actively impeded military cooperation between the Lebanese army and other international forces. A stark example occurred in 2008 when US pressure thwarted Beirut from accepting military support from Russia, including advanced weaponry like MIG-29s, tanks, and ammunition.

In response to this asymmetry, there emerges a crucial need for neighboring states to cultivate their own capabilities, establishing deterrence against the conventional military might of Israel. This approach aligns with the realist school of international relations, which perceives the global order as inherently chaotic, compelling states to prioritize their security and interests through the accumulation of power — often in the forms of military and economic strength.

Time to get real

Realism also contends that maintaining peace necessitates a balance of power. When power is distributed equitably among states, it deters any single state from attempting dominance, as the cost of aggression becomes prohibitively high.

However, this balance is delicate and requires constant maintenance. From a realist perspective, peace is not merely the absence of conflict but relies on a stable power structure preventing major wars or unilateral domination. Therefore, aside from the obvious exception of Iran, other members of the region's Axis of Resistance (Lebanon, Yemen, Iraq, Syria) must persist in building a deterrent against the Israeli military to forestall major conflicts and ensure stability in West Asia.

The realist school also posits that powerful states are inclined to expand their interests and influence beyond their borders as part of their pursuit of national interests and security. As states grow in power, their national interests become increasingly entwined with international dynamics, prompting deeper engagement beyond their borders.

Thus, alongside historical evidence of Israel’s inherent expansionist tendencies, behavioral science points to the fact that possessing substantial power will further drive the state to extend its influence beyond its geographical boundaries. To counteract this, establishing a robust deterrent force becomes imperative.

Considering the size of Israel's military arsenal and technology sector relative to the 22,000 square kilometers it occupies, the occupation state stands out as one of the leading spenders on defense globally, a major arms exporter, the largest recipient of US military support, and boasting one of the world's largest military reserves.

Despite the formidable force at Tel Aviv's disposal, the Resistance Axis has recently demonstrated, notably through Yemen's Ansarallah-led forces, that there exist significant vulnerabilities within Israel's extensive security apparatus. The Lebanese resistance movement, Hezbollah, has also consistently punctured the myth of Israeli military prowess through successful cross-border operations that establish new rules of engagement. And, while Iran's indigenous missile arsenal has yet to come into play, it may potentially be the one-two punch that neutralizes Israel's entire arsenal.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/a-cal ... -to-israel
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:17 am

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 8 - 9
January 9, 2024
Rybar

Image

The main clashes in the Gaza Strip are now taking place in the southern and central parts of the enclave. In the north, the IDF is mopping up Hamas after destroying much of the military infrastructure, although scattered groups of militants are attempting to set up ambushes and carry out incursions.

The intensity of Israeli air strikes on populated areas of the enclave is not particularly reduced. According to the local Ministry of Health, since October 7, more than 23 thousand people have been killed as a result of the bombings, and the number of wounded is approaching 60 thousand.

IDF raids and clashes continue routinely in the West Bank . Arrests of alleged Hamas accomplices took place in all major cities of the autonomy, and in East Jerusalem the house of one of the terrorists was blown up.

The situation on the border with Lebanon has worsened significantly : Hezbollah launched a series of attacks, also hitting the headquarters building of the IDF Northern Command in Safed . However, the Israelis responded asymmetrically - in the evening information appeared about the death of another major commander of the group, who was responsible for launching drones.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

In the northern part of the enclave, after the withdrawal of Israeli troops, Palestinian incursions against the remaining IDF forces occur from time to time. In particular, clashes were reported in the Az-Zeitoun and Al-Karama areas , where, according to Palestinian media reports, several armored vehicles were damaged. In addition, Hamas still has the ability to bomb nearby communities outside the Gaza Strip. Warning and air defense sirens were recorded in Sderot , Nir Am , Alumim and other settlements.

Center of the Gaza Strip

Image
The IDF launches multiple artillery and air strikes on the central Gaza Strip . The refugee camps of Al-Maghazi and Nuseirat , the settlements of Az-Zawaida and Deir al-Balah are under attack . In the latter, several airstrikes were carried out in the vicinity of the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Hospital and schools where refugees are being held. The Palestinians said there were multiple civilian casualties.

The main clashes are taking place in the Al-Breij area , where the IDF, having established control over the outskirts, is treating the central part of the settlement with artillery and aircraft. The Palestinians are still able to launch forays and conduct relatively targeted mortar fire on Israeli-controlled territory.

South Gaza Strip
The main events take place in and around Khan Younis , where the IDF advances south of the city in the vicinity of the Islamic University in the Al-Ma'an area . Based on reports from Palestinian sources, the Israelis are moving to join forces advancing from Khirbet Khuzaa to create another pocket.

Border with Lebanon

Image
On the Israeli-Lebanese border, the situation has become significantly tense due to Israeli UAV strikes deep in Lebanese territory. The leader of the military wing of the Palestinian organization Hamas in the West Bank, Saleh al-Arouri, and the senior commander of the Rezvan special forces of Hezbollah, Haj Jawad, were killed at-Tawil .

In response to their death, fighters of the Shiite group attacked the headquarters of the IDF Northern Command in the city of Safed with kamikaze drones : the base suffered minor material damage. According to Israeli media, there were no casualties.


Aside from avenging al-Tawil and al-Arouri, Hezbollah members have reported 11 strikes on IDF positions in the north of the Jewish state over the past two days. Thus, according to the Lebanese, a Merkava tank was hit by fire at the Ruweisat al-Asi facility and an Israeli military detachment in the vicinity of the Jal al-Alam base . We should expect a further escalation of attacks, including in connection with the emergence of information that At-Tawil was not the only victim of the attack.

Israeli troops, meanwhile, continue to carry out attacks on the territory of the southern part of Lebanon: the IDF hit Kfar Qila and An-Nakura most intensively . And today, before the start of the funeral procession of Jawad al-Tawil, Ali Hussein Barji , commander of Hezbollah’s air forces, was killed during an Israeli UAV attack in the city of Khirbet - Selm .


Let us recall that on January 8, a week after the attack on the suburbs of Beirut, an Israeli drone carried out another targeted strike on Herbet Selm in the south of the country. As a result of a rocket attack, one of the senior commanders of the Rezvan special forces of Hezbollah, Haj Jawad al-Tawil, was killed.

West Bank

IDF police operations against suspected Hamas supporters continue in the West Bank. Arrests took place in Jerusalem , Hebron , Qalqilya , Nablus , Ramallah , Bethlehem and Jenin : 25 Palestinians have been arrested since yesterday . In total, according to Palestinian humanitarian organizations, the number of detainees since October 7, 2023 in this region has reached 5,755 people.

During one of the raids in Tulkarm , a group of Palestinians trying to escape came across an Israeli patrol, which opened heavy fire on them: all three people were killed, and an IDF armored vehicle ran over the body of one of them. The Palestinian media portrayed the dead as civilians. However, one of them had a rifle with him. They were later called "resistance fighters" by the Qatari television channel Al Jazeera .

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

Pro-Iranian forces once again attacked a US base at the Conoco plant east of Deir ez-Zor in Syria. However, footage appeared online showing air defense operations at the Harir base , which Iraqi pro-Iranian formations repeatedly tried to hit. In this particular case, the drone was shot down.

In addition, the anti-Houthi coalition squadron is growing in the Red Sea. The head of the British Ministry of Defense, Grant Shepps, announced the dispatch of the HMS Richmond to the Red Sea as part of the fight against the Houthi threat, for which HMS Diamond is already operating in the region.

Late in the evening, reports emerged of Houthi UAV activity in the Red Sea, but without any specifics.

Political-diplomatic background
On the return of Palestinians to the northern Gaza Strip

Residents of the enclave will be able to return to Gaza and other settlements in the north of the strip if this is included in the deal with Hamas to return the hostages, Axios reports.

However, it is worth understanding that the presence of Palestinians on the territory of Palestine is not very beneficial for Israel, and the displacement of Arabs into the territory of neighboring Arab states fits perfectly into the strategy to cleanse the living space. Regardless of the outcome of the fate of the hostages, the far-right Israeli authorities will not abandon the solution to the “Palestine issue.”

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

After having dealt with Uke propaganda you'd think Rybar would take Israeli pronouncements with a grain of salt... The Russian relationship with Israeli is complicated.

******

JANUARY 9, 2024 BY M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
Blinken’s window dressing tour of Arab capitals

Image
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (R) met with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in AlUla, January 8, 2023

The expectation raised by the United States in allowing a UN Security Council resolution on Gaza pass through on December 22, 2023 without having to exercise its veto — albeit a watered-down one that stopped short of calling for ceasefire — was that the manifest international isolation facing Washington and Tel Aviv would inevitably impact Israel’s options going forward.

However, there are contrarian trends. Israel started the new year by ordering the withdrawal of part of its military forces from Gaza, but the spokesman of the IDF Daniel Hagari emphasised that the war will continue in 2024 and called this withdrawal in line with the renewal of forces and new organisation of Israeli army. Speaking on New Year’s Eve, Hagari said, “Tonight, 2024 begins and our goals require a long war, and we are preparing ourselves accordingly. We have a smart plan to manage our deployments, taking into account reserves, the economy, families, and resupply, as well as the continuation of combat and training.”

Hagari’s ambivalent hint that the military has wrapped up major combat in northern Gaza was buttressed with the claim that the forces would “continue to deepen the achievement” in northern Gaza, strengthen defences along the Israel-Gaza border fence and focus on the central and southern parts of the territory.

On Thursday, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant also presented a plan of a shift toward less intense military operations. The minister’s office said in a statement, “In the northern region of the Gaza strip, we will transition to a new combat approach in accordance with military achievements on the ground.” But Gallant added, “It will continue for as long as is deemed necessary.” Under Gallant’s plan, the war in Gaza will continue until all of the hostages are released and remaining military threats are neutralised.

Basically, Hagari’s remarks and Gallant’s plan can be seen as a nod to the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken who is expected in Israel later this week after visiting Turkey, Jordan, Qatar, UAE and Saudi Arabia. At the same time, Israel has, typically, also ratcheted up tensions by a series of belligerent acts in the recent days.

There has been a new escalation of cross-border fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. Besides, the targeted killing of a top Hamas political leader Saleh al-Arouri in a Hezbollah stronghold of Beirut last week; the killing of a senior IRGC commander and four others in the suburbs of Damascus; terrorist attacks in Kerman (Iran); killing of the commander of the elite Radwan forces of Hezbollah; — all these within the space of the past week are attributable to Israeli intelligence one way or another.

These events in turn have added to the resurgent fears lately that an Israel-Hamas war could erupt into a broader conflict. Earlier today, Hezbollah deputy leader Naim Qassem, said in a televised speech his group did not want to expand the war from Lebanon, “but if Israel expands, the response is inevitable to the maximum extent required to deter Israel.”

The pattern of Israeli behaviour needs to be understood from different angles. This is an incredibly complicated matrix. First and foremost, the Israeli operation in Gaza so far has been a failure. It turned the world opinion, especially in the Global South, heavily against Israel — South Africa’s petition to the International Criminal Court over war crimes in Gaza being the most telling evidence of it — while Israeli military came a cropper in terms of its agenda to decimate Hamas.

Tel Aviv has reached none of its stated goals in the Gaza war, which are annihilation of Hamas or disarming of Hamas and release of captives held by Palestinians in Gaza. That brings the security and military establishment in Tel Aviv, whose reputation has been seriously dented following the October 7 attack, under immense pressure. On the other hand, there has been a cover-up of the heavy casualty suffered by Israeli troops in the Gaza operation. The Kerman terrorist attack and the killing of Saleh al-Arouri actually betray a high level of frustration.

In political terms, there is a convergence between the security and military establishment and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (whose political future hangs by a thread) and the ultra-rightist fascist forces aligned with him, whose interests lie in an extended war.

The only external force capable of pressuring Israel is of course the US administration. But it is too much to expect President Biden to draw the ‘red line’ to Israel — that is, even assuming that he has the political will to do so — given the Israel Lobby’s control of the Congress and its seamless capacity for making or destroying the careers of US politicians.

Washington has not changed the intensity of Israeli military operation. On the other hand, the US has shipped to Israel 10,000 tons of arms to Israel in the recent period alone. In fact, it cannot be a coincidence that every single Blinken visit to the region since October 7 has witnessed a particularly brutal Israeli attack to up the ante. In effect, the US is broadly in support of the Israeli policy and a commitment to the destruction of Hamas, in particular.

Therefore, Biden’s interest narrows down to prevent the war from spreading in the region lest direct American military intervention becomes necessary. The US rhetoric and diplomatic posturing largely aims at damage control in Washington’s relations with its erstwhile allies in the region. Quintessentially, Blinken’s mission comes down cheap window dressing — viz., to bringing the regional states to the same page that Israel is facing an existential crisis. But it does not take into account that the region has changed radically.

What truly distinguishes the present crisis is that the Arab world is profoundly concerned and feels outraged by the barbaric Israeli behaviour toward hapless Palestinians — ‘animals,’ as Israeli politicians have described them. The Arab psyche is convinced that an enduring final settlement of the Palestine problem cannot be postponed indefinitely. Something has fundamentally changed even for Saudi Arabia which had clandestine dealings with Israel for decades and was inching toward establishing formal relations with it.

A Saudi statement said that while receiving Blinken in Al ‘Ula on Monday, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman “stressed the importance of stopping military operations, intensifying humanitarian action, and working to create conditions for restoring stability and for a peace process that ensures that the Palestinian people gain their legitimate rights and achieve a just and lasting peace.” The Saudi statement is at sharp variance with the readout by the US state department.

Interestingly, an article in the Saudi daily Asharq Al-Awsat focused on Blinken’s forthcoming visit highlighted fundamental differences between Riyadh and Washington on a range of issues — ceasefire in Gaza (“not just a humanitarian truce or exchange of prisoners, but rather a comprehensive halt”); security of the Red Sea (“the responsibility for security in the Red Sea lies with the riparian countries first, and with a UN-international responsibility in the second place”); Israel’s culpability for “expanding the scope of the war”; futility of “talk about post-war phase” at this point.

The article ended on a sombre note: “If the American administration wants Blinken’s visit to Saudi Arabia and the region to succeed, and if it wants to maintain its partnerships in the region, and preserve its role as a sponsor of peace in the Middle East at a time when international forces hostile to Washington are searching for a foothold in the region, it must adhere to neutrality, and not use the region’s interests and future as a card in the upcoming American elections. It must deal with the disease and not with the symptom as it is doing now.”

https://www.indianpunchline.com/blinken ... -capitals/

*******

Palestine SitRep: Sanitizing Language While The War Escalates

The New York Times has claimed that Israel is cutting back its brutal war in Gaza:

The Israeli military has begun a new and less intense phase of its invasion of Gaza, its chief spokesman said on Monday, after weeks of pressure from the United States and other allies to scale back an offensive that has caused widespread devastation and civilian deaths.

The Nation however finds that this is certainly not the case:

The Israeli Defense Forces spokesman, Radm. Daniel Hagari, gave the Times the interview that it used for its headline. But Hagari’s quotes never actually promise the “less intense phase” in the Times paraphrase. Hagari instead describes the focus of the pitiless Israeli campaign shifting southward—while his superiors in the Israeli government indicate that it could expand regionally.

The Times isn't the only main stream media to lie about the war. CNN is routing all news through its Jerusalem bureau where an Israeli military censor takes care that everything is 'sanitized'. This while the Washington Post is sending out its most Zionist reporter to write a hit piece about pro-Palestinian news sites.

The Canadian Broadcast Corporation is using harmless language to describe Israeli air attacks while it brutalizes reports of Hamas ground attack. It even justifies this:

“Different words are used because although both result in death and injury, the events they describe are very different,” Waugh wrote. “The raid saw Hamas gunmen stream through the border fence and attack Israelis directly with firearms, knives and explosives. Gunmen chased down festival goers, assaulted kibbutzniks then shot them, fought hand to hand, and threw grenades. The attack was brutal, often vicious, and certainly murderous.”
“Bombs dropped from thousands of feet and artillery shells lofted into Gaza from kilometers away result in death and destruction on a massive scale, but it is carried out remotely,” Waugh continued. “The deadly results are unseen by those who caused them and the source unseen by those [who] suffer and die.”


All these censorship and disinformation efforts hide the reality of the brutal war from the western public.

This while the extremely brutal Israel attacks on Gaza continue as the occupation forces now move into the center of the strip:

Israeli attacks around central Gaza’s last remaining hospital caused hundreds of displaced civilians to flee over the weekend and forced most medical workers to evacuate, leaving wounded people with no good options for seeking care as fighting intensifies in the area.

Organizations including Doctors Without Borders, the International Rescue Committee and Medical Aid for Palestinians have pulled their staff from al-Aqsa Hospital in recent days, after the surrounding areas in the Deir al-Balah region came under drone attacks and sniper fire, and residents received warnings from the Israel Defense Forces to evacuate.


The people who had already fled from north Gaza now have to move further south towards Rafah where Israel is bombing them too.

The targeted killing of journalists and academics continues. However none of these are Hamas and Israel's declared aim of eliminating it is certainly not in sight. Hamas missile strike on targets in Israel continue. Even though most are harmless they cause alarms. In the north of Israel the tit for tat attacks between Hizbullah and the occupation forces continues likewise.

Ali Hashem علي هاشم @alihashem_tv - 9:54 UTC · Jan 9, 2024
Hezbollah announces the targeting of the northern region command headquarters of the Israeli army in the city of Safed (13 kilometres from the border) with a number of explosives laden drones. The attack was in retaliation to Israel’s killing of Saleh Arouri and Wissam Tawil.


This was the deepest attack by Hizbullah since October 8. Later Israel attacked the burial of Wissam Tawil, a member of Hizbullah's special forces. The number of alarms in Israel from rockets launched from the north are growing on a daily basis.

Israel is driving this escalation while Hizbullah is still holding back. Its missiles could reach far further and will do so should Israel continue to escalate.

The U.S. is alarmed about the Israeli attempt to draw it into the conflict:

In private conversations, the administration has warned Israel against a significant escalation in Lebanon. If it were to do so, a new secret assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) found that it will be difficult for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to succeed because its military assets and resources would be spread too thin given the conflict in Gaza, according to two people familiar with those findings.

Private warnings are useless as long as Israel still gets U.S. support.

The Biden administration wants to be seen supporting Israel.

It also wants to be seen tamping down and ending the conflict.

But it can't have it both ways.

Shutting down ammunition support for Israel, if only for a short time, is likely the only way to bring some senses to Israeli minds.

Posted by b on January 9, 2024 at 14:16 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/01/p ... .html#more

******

Gaza Diaries: A Daily Search for Water and Firewood
JANUARY 7, 2024

Image
A Palestinian woman and her children cook food outside a house in Gaza, December 22, 2023. Photo: AFP.

Palestinian journalist Yousef Fares reports from Gaza for Al-Akhbar.

After over 90 days of catastrophic war on the Gaza Strip, Gaza residents’ daily struggle is reduced to an endless search for water and firewood. The water supply to homes and shelters has been cut off, and cooking gas has also been completely cut off. Men and children are forced to go out early in the morning in search of firewood.

Ahmed Abu Hamam, a teacher who works for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), told Al-Akhbar, “Our daily lives are reduced to three tasks: We wake up after dawn, spend five hours securing 20 liters of water, then scour the streets and bombed houses in search of wood and firewood. If there is still enough time in the day, we look for a place to charge our phones… and this is a luxury.”

On al-Sikka Street, east of the Jabalia refugee camp, where tank and artillery shells are constantly falling, we met the brothers Sameh and Assem. Despite their frail bodies, they were dragging a cart full of wood. Assem, whose family is staying in one of the UNRWA schools in the Jabalia camp, told us, “We went out in the morning to the streets to collect firewood. Our mother is waiting for it so she can cook at the school.”

“The other day the occupation bombed three young men from our neighborhood while they were collecting firewood,” he added.

According to local sources, five young men were martyred on January 4 while collecting firewood from an area bulldozed by the occupation in the city of Beit Hanoun, in the far north of the Gaza Strip.

Not far from the brothers Sameh and Assem, we met Khalil Awad and his brothers. They were digging through the rubble of a destroyed house. Their task was to search for the doors and furniture of the house. “This is the last remaining treasure,” Khalil told Al-Akhbar. “We need large quantities of firewood for cooking and heating water. Today, firewood is scarce, and the price per kilo is 7 shekels (2 USD). Due to the cold weather, we are forced to light fires at night to keep warm. So, there is no other option than to dig out remaining furniture from under the rubble.”

Families are not the only ones struggling to obtain firewood. Abu Ibrahim Dahlan is the owner of the only kitchen that is still operating in the northern Gaza Strip. He said that he has been unable to operate the kitchen for several days due to the lack of fuel and firewood. “We are responsible for providing food every day to more than 10 shelters where 100,000 people are staying,” he told Al-Akhbar. “They rely primarily on the rice that we provide. If we do not find a solution to replenish our cooking gas soon, we will face a terrible humanitarian crisis.”

It is worth noting that no cooking gas has entered the northern Gaza Strip for over 90 days. The occupation violated the agreement to supply gas to the north during the six-day ceasefire more than a month ago.

https://orinocotribune.com/gaza-diaries ... -firewood/

*******

Support grows for South Africa’s case against Israel

Bolivia and Malaysia have issued statements of support for Pretoria, which has called on the ICJ to issue urgent measures to stop Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

January 08, 2024 by Tanupriya Singh

Image
Photo: Mohammed Saqer via @PalestineRCS/X

Bolivia has joined the ranks of countries who support South Africa’s historic case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for the ongoing genocide in Gaza. The Hague is set to initiate public hearings on the matter on January 11.

In a statement on January 7, the Bolivian government recognized “that South Africa took a historic step in the defense of the Palestinian people, a leadership and effort that should be accompanied by the international community that clamors for the respect for life”.

Bolivia was among the countries, including South Africa and Bangladesh, who had submitted an appeal to the International Criminal Court (ICC) on November 17 to investigate the crimes being committed in Palestine, including genocide. The ICC is a separate entity, established under the Rome Statute, which oversees cases against individuals.

The ICJ is the judicial institution of the United Nations, and countries including Israel and South Africa are bound by the Court by virtue of their membership of the UN. The Court adjudicates disputes between countries and its decisions are legally binding. Israel and South Africa are also State Parties to the 1948 Genocide Convention, under which Pretoria has brought its lawsuit.

The historic step has been supported by other countries including Malaysia, which called it a “timely and tangible step towards legal accountability for Israel’s atrocities in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian territories at large”.

Turkey and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) have similarly backed the case, with the 57-member bloc stating that it has “affirmed that the indiscriminate targeting by Israel, the occupying power, of the civilian population and the thousands of Palestinians…killed, injured, forcibly displaced, and denied basic necessities…in their totality constitute mass genocide.”

Meanwhile, Jordan, which signed a peace treaty with Israel 30 years ago, has announced that it will support South Africa at the ICJ, including by preparing necessary legal documents.

On January 8, over 900 popular movements, political parties, unions, and other organizations called upon states across the world to file a “Declaration of Intervention” in support of South Africa’s application at the ICJ.

“If a majority of the world’s nations call for a ceasefire, yet fail to press for prosecution of Israel – what is to stop Israel from ethnically cleansing all Palestinians?… For that matter, what is to stop other nations from repeating a horror of this magnitude?”

The case against Israel
Israel’s bombardment of Gaza has entered its fourth month, killing over 22,900 Palestinians and injuring over 58,000. At least 7,000 people are unaccounted for, presumed to be dead and still buried under the rubble.

Given the “ongoing, extreme, and irreparable harm being suffered by Palestinians in Gaza”, Pretoria has called on the ICJ to issue emergency measures, including ordering Israel to immediately cease its military operations in and against Gaza as well as all genocidal acts as outlined in the application. The hearings beginning on Thursday pertain to these provisional measures.

In the 84-page application submitted to the court, South Africa emphasizes the obligation of all State Parties to the 1948 Convention to take “all reasonable measures within their power to prevent genocide”. As such, it has urged the Court to recognize that Israel has breached this obligation.

“The acts and omissions by Israel…are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial, and ethnic group,” it argued, as defined under Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.

The acts include killing Palestinians in Gaza in large numbers; causing serious bodily and mental harm; and inflicting on them conditions of life intended to bring about their destruction as a group— which includes mass expulsions, the deprivation of food, water, medical care, and shelter, the destruction of life of the Palestinian people, and the imposition of measures intended to prevent Palestinian births.

While evidence of these conditions is presented in meticulous detail in the application, South Africa has highlighted that in order to indicate provisional measures, the Court is not required to determine whether Israel has violated the Genocide Convention. Instead, it needs to establish whether the acts described are capable of falling under the convention’s provisions.

The proceedings
South Africa will present its arguments before 15 judges of the ICJ on January 11. Additionally, both South Africa and Israel have each nominated a judge to the panel. Pretoria has nominated Dikgang Moseneke, the former Deputy Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa.

Meanwhile, the country’s legal team at the Hague will be led by John Dugard SC. He is a leading international law and human rights lawyer and has previously served as the UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and led two UN commissions investigating Israel’s violation of international law. He has also served as an ad-hoc judge at the ICJ.

Other senior members of the team include Adila Hassim, who has dealt with prominent cases related to socio-economic rights including access to health services; legal scholar and lawyer Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, who led several high profile cases against former South African president Jacob Zuma and recently represented a coalition of unions and civil society groups to challenge widespread power blackouts in South Africa; and Max Du Pleiss, a barrister and professor of law at the University of KwaZulu Natal, dealing with cases related to human rights and international law.

The team, which also includes other lawyers from South Africa, will be accompanied by British lawyer, Vaughan Lowe, who had previously represented Palestine at the ICJ in a 2003 case seeking an advisory opinion on Israel’s construction of the apartheid wall isolating the occupied West Bank. In its ruling in 2004, the ICJ had declared that the wall, including in and around East Jerusalem, was illegal.

The second external counsel is Irish lawyer Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh. She has previously been involved in an inquiry into the 1972 Bloody Sunday massacre perpetrated by British soldiers. Ghrálaigh recently also represented one member of the “Colston Four”, a group of activists who were acquitted for tearing down the statue of a 17th century English slave trader, Edward Colston, in Bristol.

Meanwhile, on January 7, Israeli news outlet Ynet reported that over 200 Israelis– including Ofer Cassif a member of the Knesset from the Hadash-Ta’al party (a joint platform of the Arab Movement for Renewal party and Hadash political coalition)– had signed a petition in support of South Africa’s case at the ICJ.

The text, which now has over 600 signatures, reads, “The materials that emerge from the lawsuit are horrific and credible. Israel is indeed taking systematic and thorough steps to wipe out the population of Gaza, to starve it, to abuse it and to displace it. It implements a policy of wiping out livelihood options, which leads to genocide. It systematically kills large sections of the population, leading academics, writers, doctors, medical staff, journalists and ordinary citizens.”

The petition is expected to be submitted to the ICJ on Thursday.

Israel is scared
Israel had instantly rejected South Africa’s case, deflecting from the crimes its political leadership has publicly sanctioned by raising accusations of the anti-Semitic trope of “blood libel”. Its chief weapons supplier and imperialist backer, the US called the case “meritless” and “counterproductive”.

However, Israel will be participating in the proceedings, presenting its statement before the ICJ on January 12. Its defense team will be led by Malcolm Shaw, a British lawyer and professor with expertise in international law, who has reportedly provided legal advice and assistance to Israel several times in the past.

The Occupation has also nominated Aharon Barak, a prominent jurist and the former President of the Supreme Court of Israel, to the court’s panel of judges.

In Israeli media the decision shows “that the Israeli government believes that it [the case] is such a serious legal and image problem” that it has nominated someone “it has labeled as one of its greatest opponents”, a reference to Barak’s opposition to the judicial reforms proposed by the Netanyahu government and criticisms of Benjamin Netanyahu.

However, for legal experts and observers, he is the “epitome of judicial complicity”, a “diplomat judge” who served as “Israel’s public defender abroad”.

“This is the man who turned the concept that Israel can also maintain an endless (“long-term” occupation, in his language), while massively depriving the Palestinians of their rights, dignity, property and land, and also remain democratic, into a legal doctrine,” wrote Orly Noy, an editor at Sikha Mekomit (or Local Call), a Hebrew language news outlet.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail in November, Barak said, “I agree totally with what the government is doing”, and “It may be proportional to kill five innocent kids in order to target their leader”, talking in the context of the bombings of Gaza.

Reports have also emerged of tensions within the Israeli military and political establishment ahead of the hearings. Major General Yifat Tomer-Yerushalmi of the IDF wrote a letter warning that the ICJ case “increases risks for senior officials at the political level and in the IDF”.

While intent is considered to be the most difficult factor to prove in a charge of genocide, South Africa’s submission documents statements made by nine members of government, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Isaac Herzog, six military officials and decision-makers, as well as statements by occupation soliders, all of which indicate a “clear intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a group “as such”.

Israeli officials warned in meetings that “The talks about erasing and flattening Gaza by irresponsible politicians were not answered with the required intensity by the official authorities”. At the same time, such genocidal statements have in no way ceased.

Just last week, Moshe Saada, a Knesset member from Netanyahu’s Likud Party spoke of a growing understanding in Israel that “all Gazans need to be destroyed”, stating “it is clear to everyone today, that the right wing is right in the matter of politics, in the matter of Palestinians”.

Given that an outright denial of genocidal intent seems impossible in this context, Israel is reportedly preparing its arguments for the ICJ by telling the court that “Some of those quoted [in the application] are not decision makers, the ones that are— didn’t mean what they said.”

Meanwhile, according to a report in Axios, the Israeli foreign ministry sent out a cable directing its embassies abroad to pressure political leaders and diplomats to issue statements against South Africa’s case. “A ruling by the court could have significant potential implications that are not only in the legal world but have practical bilateral, multilateral, economic, security ramifications,” the cable states.

The foreign ministry has also called for emphasis to be placed on Israel’s efforts to “increase humanitarian aid to the population in Gaza” and decrease the number of civilian casualties, which the cable states “is critical”.

Where these “efforts” have materialized remains to be seen given that Israel, on January 8 in a period of 24 hours, had massacred 249 Palestinians and injured over 500.

In a speech late last week, the UN’s humanitarian chief, Martin Griffiths warned that “famine is around the corner” in Gaza, with people facing the highest levels of food insecurity ever recorded.

“Gaza has simply become uninhabitable. Its people are witnessing daily threats to their very existence– while the world watches on.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/01/08/ ... st-israel/

******

Image
THE WARSAW GHETTO (PHOTO: PICRYL)

Why we have to make the Jewish Ghetto comparison
Originally published: Mondoweiss on January 7, 2024 by Michelle Weinroth (more by Mondoweiss) | (Posted Jan 09, 2024)

Comparisons are not about exact identities. One can always level criticism at a comparison and claim that it is imperfect. But such a judgement is inherently flawed, since comparisons are not intended to mark identity, but to underscore some shared features–critical features, to be sure, not incidental or ancillary ones.

To compare the Jewish Ghetto under Nazism with the Gaza ghetto may be profoundly disturbing; but should we look away from that similitude to avert our gaze from the horror that is unfolding now, and which, according to several expert commentators, is unprecedented in modern history? Consider the enormity and the speed with which the slaughter of innocent civilians is now taking place. Beyond the horrendous killings achieved through relentless airstrikes there is the premeditated act of depriving a besieged population of its basic necessities: food, fuel, medicine and water. There is the humiliation of both old and young men, stripped virtually naked and executed extra-judicially. Are these intentional acts of genocide not reminiscent of Nazism? Gaza, as some have called it, is not a concentration camp anymore; it is an extermination camp.

Image
PALESTINIANS TRAVELING SOUTH FROM THE ZEITOUN DISTRICT ON THE SOUTHERN OUTSKIRTS OF GAZA CITY ON NOVEMBER 26, 2023, ON THE THIRD DAY OF A TRUCE BETWEEN ISRAEL AND HAMAS. (PHOTO: AHMED IBRAHIM / APA IMAGES)

A comparison of the Gaza ghetto with the Jewish ghetto under Nazism may well spawn a debate about distinct genocidal agendas. But that discussion digresses from the central point. Differences and variations aside, what unites all manner of genocides is their unfathomable cruelty, their dizzying inhumanity. So aberrant are these acts of annihilation that they defy language. Speech and reason are stymied, disabled, and paralyzed by the apocalyptic character of this mass erasure of humankind.

It is natural to want to avert one’s eyes from all this—(and by “this” I mean all that is too obscene and repugnant to ponder for more than a fleeting moment.) But the discomfiture in this “sacrilegious” comparison pales beside the agony of the current victims—the besieged Palestinians. Their agony won’t disappear just because we turn our gaze away and refuse to confront the comparison. Might the discomfort arising from the comparison be lessened if it meant that articulating it publicly and forcefully could yield hope, could help stop the carnage and pre-empt a full-blown genocide?

I would argue that there is significant political and moral value in reinforcing the comparison, for the visceral pang that such an analogy provokes can become a salutary form of self-questioning in the otherwise conflicted, complacent, or indifferent public. The shock effect resulting from this comparison has the power to jolt that public out of its complacency, denial, and sheer sense of hopelessness. Indeed, to recall the threshold of “the unspeakable,” which marked the Holocaust of the Jews, and to draw a line from that 20th-century episode to the present is to remind the world that the war on today’s Gazans (and, indeed, on Palestinians in the West Bank) has reached that awful threshold of victimhood precipitated by Nazi violence. For years, this threshold has conjured an idea of absolute victimhood exclusive to Jews. No longer. The horror of the past has returned in a new guise; the Ur victim is not the Jew, but the Palestinian.

If we are to underscore the gravity of the current crisis, we have to invest it with urgency. The disturbing comparison, which I have articulated in the above, can potentially galvanize the general public into action, into political speech and effective protest. Not to make the comparison is to allow the apocalyptic landscape of Gaza and the slaughter to worsen. For some (notably Israel’s apologists) might say: it’s not as bad as Auschwitz so we can afford (at least morally) to continue bombing the hell out of the strip.

Political value is not the only merit in underscoring this disturbing comparison. The unsettling analogy is also a crucial means of exploding long-held myths: in other words, that Jewish victimhood is beyond compare, exalted and singular in its gravity. Indeed, it is precisely the exceptionalism with which Israel envelops itself that has allowed the Zionist political elite (wherever it may be—in the U.S., UK, Europe, or Israel) to flout international law repeatedly for more than 75 years. It is this cultivated sense of transcendent sublimity (arising from the weaponization of the Holocaust and the manipulative use of the Bible) that elevates Israel’s status to an arrogant actor on the world stage, one that is indifferent to all red lines (that is, to virtually all Geneva conventions and UN resolutions).

With this self-assigned supra-human identity, Israel’s expansionism and its slaughter of innocent Palestinians are buttressed by a sense of God-given limitless power. The death of more than 21,000 Palestinians does not sate Israel’s vindictive appetite for revenge in response to October 7. For Israel, UN resolutions belong to “mere” world affairs; and so it spurns these as paltry, couching its claims in the language of divine authority. With this supercilious rhetorical posture, it scoffs at the moral judgment and criticism leveled at it by others. It repudiates international law with brazen insouciance because it knows that, with U.S. backing, it can transgress reason and law with infinite impunity. Once pitied as the collective victim of genocide, Israel is now the perpetrator, the state that, paradoxically, wields victimhood as its quintessential raison d’être.

If we are to hold Israel to account for its crimes, we must exercise the democratic right to say openly and unabashedly that Jews have no monopoly over genocide-driven victimhood. Jews are not the eternal victims of history. Conversely, progressive Jews have a moral duty to help loosen the Zionist grip over that sense of singular victimhood. The latter is a self-assigned prerogative that enables Israel (together with its supporters) to exploit such a privilege with disastrous–genocidal–consequences. It is imperative that we help bring that carnage to a full stop.

The comparison of the Jewish ghetto under Nazism with the Gaza ghetto under Israel’s (current) fascistic authority must cease to be sacrilegious. In fact, it is essential that the comparison, however uncomfortable, be voiced openly, if only to force Israel and its apologists to see the “Jewish” state’s reflection in the mirror of the Nazi past, and, hopefully, to ponder with revulsion its own fascistic reality. If this could happen, it would mark a significant turning point in history.

https://mronline.org/2024/01/09/why-we- ... omparison/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Jan 10, 2024 11:15 pm

The Spectacular Failure of the Zionist Project
January 8, 2024

The two-state solution is no longer possible and the only way forward is the struggle for a democratic secular state accommodating both Palestinians and Israelis, writes Stefan Moore.


Image
A young girl in the Gaza Strip is taken to receive medical care, Oct. 17 2023. (Fars Media Corporation, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

By Stefan Moore
Special to Consortium News

As a secular Jew raised in a fiercely anti-Zionist family, I grew up viewing the State of Israel as an unfortunate fait accompli and accepting that the two-state solution was probably the best that could be hoped for.

Since then, I have come to the conclusion that the creation of a Jewish state was a catastrophic mistake and that Zionist Israel has relinquished its right to exist.

What good could possibly have come from a project that handed a group of Jewish Europeans a land that for countless centuries was inhabited by Arab Palestinians?

Not only did Palestinians have no say in the creation of a Jewish state on their homeland, but just at the time when other developing countries around the world were finally breaking free from the yoke of colonial rule Palestinians, like Native Americans and Australia’s First Nations people before them, became the victims of European settler colonialism — this time endorsed by a U.N. resolution that neither the Palestinians nor any of the Arab states agreed to or voted for.

Image
Second Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, Aug. 28, 1898. On podium, center stage, Theodor Herzl is seen indistinctly, giving keynote address. (Robert Spreng/National Library of Israel/Wikimedia Commons)

The driving force behind both the 1917 Balfour Declaration that called for a Jewish homeland in the British Mandate of Palestine and the 1948 U.N. Partition Plan that established a Jewish State, was Zionism, a religious, political and cultural movement that began in the late 19th century to claim Palestine as the God-given homeland of the Jewish people.

Contrary to official mythology, however, the Zionist fervour was not shared by the majority of Jews.

The socialist Jewish Labour Bund in Eastern Europe, for instance, believed that Jewish culture should be preserved right at home in the shtetls (villages) as opposed to running off to Palestine and thought that the notion of Jews colonising Palestine was farcical. They even wrote a mocking Yiddish song for the Zionists – “Oy, Ir Narishe Tsionistn” (“You Foolish Little Zionist”).

Meanwhile Jews, Christians and Muslims had been living aside each other in historic Palestine in relative peace for centuries. It was only after the rapid influx of European Jewish refugees fleeing the pogroms in Eastern Europe following World War I, and in the wake of the Holocaust, that the conflicts in Palestine escalated and the bloodshed on both sides began.

By the time of the U.N. partition plan, Israeli Defence Force brigades had already launched a bloody campaign of burning villages and killing men, women and children to drive Palestinians off their land. In all, 750,000 Palestinians were expelled into refugee camps in neighbouring Arab countries.

This was the beginning of the Nakba (the catastrophe) that continues today – most strikingly in Gaza — as Zionist zealots insist Israel has a rightful claim to all the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.

Image
Basel Steet, Tel Aviv, 1939 named after Basel, Switzerland where Zionist Congresses were held. (Public Domain)

In their view, all of Palestine belongs to Jews because in the words of Likud Party Knesset Member Danny Danon, the Bible is “our deed to the land.”

For Zionists like Danon, expelling Palestinians is an existential necessity, a view that echoed in 1956 by Moshe Dayan, military commander of the Jerusalem Front in 1948, who proclaimed:

“We are a generation of settlers, and without the steel helmet and the cannon we cannot plant a tree and build a home… This is the fate of our generation, and the choice of our life – to be prepared and armed, strong and tough – or otherwise, the sword will slip from our fist, and our life will be snuffed out.

What cause have we to complain about their fierce hatred to us? For eight years now, they sit in their refugee camps in Gaza, and before their eyes we turn into our homestead the land and villages in which they and their forefathers have lived.

Let us not be afraid to see the hatred that accompanies and consumes the lives of hundreds of thousands of Arabs who sit all around us and wait for the moment when their hands will be able to reach our blood.”

Next Uprising Would Dwarf Oct. 7

Image
A Hamas rocket attack from Gaza into Israel, Oct. 7, 2023. (Tasnim News Agency, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

As Dayan knew then, Israel would never be safe. In Gaza now, Israel is creating the next generation of Palestinian resistance fighters who have witnessed their families slaughtered, guaranteeing that the next uprising will dwarf the Hamas invasion of Oct. 7.

Whatever legitimacy Israel might have claimed as a haven for Jewish refugees who were abandoned in the West after the Holocaust, their right to a state of their own has long since been forfeited.

Both the 1917 Balfour Declaration that promised Jews a homeland in the British Mandate of Palestine and the 1948 U.N. partition plan creating the State of Israel stipulated that the rights of Palestinians had to be safeguarded and, following the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in 1948, U.N. General Assembly Resolution 194 of that year specifically said the refugees’ had the right to return “at the earliest practicable date.”

On all counts, Israel has completely failed to live up to its obligations to protect the most basic rights of the Palestinian people.

Today, Palestinians living inside Israel remain second-class citizens without equal rights to own property or even use their own language. On the West Bank, Palestinians are dispossessed and murdered daily by Jewish settlers with the backing of the IDF.

In Gaza, even before Israel’s invasion following Oct. 7, Palestinians have lived under a brutal state of siege in an open air prison. The millions of Palestinians who were exiled into refugee camps in neighbouring Arab states are still denied the right to return.

Indeed, the Zionists have brought to Palestine the very scourge they fled in Europe — murdering, expelling and ethnically cleansing an entire population, mirroring the behaviour of their Nazi oppressors.

In the documentary film Tantura about the 1948 massacre of almost 300 Palestinians in the Palestinian village of Tantura, former Israeli soldiers, now in their 90s, retell the story of the slaughter unashamedly.

One brigade member laughs as he recalls, “Of course we killed them, without remorse… If you killed, you did a good thing.” An old woman says matter-of-factly, “Let them remember (what we did to them) like we remember what happened in Europe (the Holocaust). If they did it, we can also.”



Yet, despite the evidence of Israeli war crimes, Zionists have continued to deny Israel’s atrocities while claiming their own superiority. Professor emeritus at Haifa University, Ilan Pappe, says of the mindset:

“I think the self-image of Israel as a moral society is something I haven’t seen anywhere else in the world. We are the ‘Chosen People’ (in the Old Testament Jews were chosen by God as his special people). This is part of the Israeli self-identification…(But) basically, the project of Zionism has a problem… You cannot create a safe haven by creating a catastrophe for other people.”

Today, complicit Western leaders and their media proxies wring their hands about the regrettable loss of civilian lives in Gaza while hypocritically calling for a two-state solution they know is virtually impossible since Israel has reduced the amount of Palestinian land from 45 percent at the time of partition to 15 percent today.

Craig Mokhiber, who recently resigned as New York director for the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights over the U.N.’s failure to act on war crimes in Gaza, said in his resignation letter:

“The mantra of the ‘two-state solution’ has become an open joke in the corridors of the U.N., both for its utter impossibility in fact, and for its total failure to account for the inalienable human rights of the Palestinian people.”

Writing On Wall For Two-State Solution

Image
Academic Ghada Karmi at the Palestinian Festival of Literature in 2011. (PalFest/Raouf haj Yihya via Creative Commons)

After 75 years of Israel’s colonial oppression of the Palestinian people, it has become glaringly obvious that any notion of a two-state solution has become little more than a fig leaf for Israel’s apartheid regime and the only way forward is one secular democratic state that safeguards the fundamental rights and equality for all of its citizens.

Obviously, it won’t happen overnight or without conflict – Israel will aggressively defend its perceived right to exist as a Jewish state with the massive backing of the Western powers. Palestinians will never abandon their yearning for a homeland as it was before the arrival of European Jewish settlers — but the writing is on the wall.

Almost two decades ago the late Palestinian-American academic Edward Said wrote that:

“The beginning (of one democratic state) is to develop something entirely missing from both Israeli and Palestinian realities today: the idea and practice of citizenship, not of ethnic or racial community, as the main vehicle of coexistence.”

More recently, Palestinian academic and physician Ghada Karmi has cautioned:

“The U.N. that made Israel and must now unmake it, not by expulsion and displacement as in 1948, but by converting its bleak legacy into a future of hope for both peoples in one state.”

But if the U.N. fails to act, Karmi sees a more apocalyptic path to the end of the Zionist state. In her recent book One State: The Only Democratic Future for Palestine, she writes:

“Israel will fiercely reject the shared state, but will be powerless to prevent it from happening. … It will not happen solely as a result of a one-state campaign and solidarity movements. … but rather through people’s natural resistance to relentless oppression leading to the ultimate overthrow of the oppressors.”

If that can happen without cataclysmic global repercussions, possibly bringing the U.S. and Europe to the brink of the next world war, perhaps a new secular democratic state for both Jews and Palestinians will evolve from the struggle.

In any event, it is time to acknowledge that the Zionist project has been a spectacular failure and the status quo can no longer be maintained. Israel has become a pariah state in the eyes of most of the world and the winds of change are now howling across the region.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/01/08/t ... t-project/

Israel Worried Ahead of World Court Genocide Hearings
January 9, 2024
Save
The Netanyahu regime and its chief patron, the United States, understand the magnitude of South Africa’s ICJ application, which will be heard this week, writes Marjorie Cohn.

Image
The International Court of Justice, principal judicial organ of the UN, holding a public hearing in 2022. (UN Photo/Frank van Beek)

By Marjorie Cohn
Truthout

For nearly three months, Israel has enjoyed virtual impunity for its atrocious crimes against the Palestinian people.

That changed on Dec. 29 when South Africa, a state party to the Genocide Convention, filed an 84-page application in the International Court of Justice (ICJ, or World Court) alleging that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

South Africa’s well-documented application alleges that

“acts and omissions by Israel … are genocidal in character, as they are committed with the requisite specific intent … to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a part of the broader Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group” and that “the conduct of Israel — through its State organs, State agents, and other persons and entities acting on its instructions or under its direction, control or influence — in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, is in violation of its obligations under the Genocide Convention.”

Israel is mounting a full-court press to prevent an ICJ finding that it’s committing genocide in Gaza. On Jan. 4, the Israeli Foreign Ministry instructed its embassies to pressure politicians and diplomats in their host countries to make statements opposing South Africa’s case at the ICJ.

[Consortium News will provide live coverage of the two-day hearing Thursday and Friday, 10am to noon each day in The Hague, 4-6 am EST.]

In its application, South Africa cited eight allegations to support its contention that Israel is perpetrating genocide in Gaza. They include:

(1) Killing Palestinians in Gaza, including a large proportion of women and children (approximately 70 percent) of the more than 21,110 fatalities and some appear to have been subjected to summary execution;

(2) Causing serious mental and bodily harm to Palestinians in Gaza, including maiming, psychological trauma, and inhuman and degrading treatment;

(3) Causing the forced evacuation and displacement of about 85 percent of Palestinians in Gaza — including children, the elderly and infirm, and the sick and wounded. Israel is also causing the massive destruction of Palestinian homes, villages, towns, refugee camps and entire areas, which precludes the return of a significant proportion of the Palestinian people to their homes;

(4) Causing widespread hunger, starvation and dehydration to the besieged Palestinians in Gaza by impeding sufficient humanitarian assistance, cutting off sufficient food, water, fuel and electricity, and destroying bakeries, mills, agricultural lands and other means of production and sustenance;

Image
Protester at a Palestinian solidarity demonstration in London, Oct. 28, 2023. (Alisdare Hickson, Flickr, CC BY-SA 2.0)

(5) Failing to provide and restricting the provision of adequate clothing, shelter, hygiene and sanitation to Palestinians in Gaza, including 1.9 million internally displaced persons. This has compelled them to live in dangerous situations of squalor, in conjunction with routine targeting and destruction of places of shelter and killing and wounding of persons who are sheltering, including women, children, the elderly and the disabled;

(6) Failing to provide for or ensure the provision of medical care to Palestinians in Gaza, including those medical needs created by other genocidal acts that are causing serious bodily harm. This is occurring by direct attacks on Palestinian hospitals, ambulances and other healthcare facilities, the killing of Palestinian doctors, medics and nurses (including the most qualified medics in Gaza) and the destruction and disabling of Gaza’s medical system;

(7) Destroying Palestinian life in Gaza, by destroying its infrastructure, schools, universities, courts, public buildings, public records, libraries, stores, churches, mosques, roads, utilities and other facilities necessary to sustain the lives of Palestinians as a group. Israel is killing whole families, erasing entire oral histories and killing prominent and distinguished members of society;

Image
Gaza, Oct. 7, 2023. (Ali Hamad of APAimages for WAFA, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

(8) Imposing measures intended to prevent Palestinian births in Gaza, including through reproductive violence inflicted on Palestinian women, newborns, infants and children.

South Africa cited myriad statements by Israeli officials that constitute direct evidence of an intent to commit genocide:

“Gaza won’t return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything,” Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said. “If it doesn’t take one day, it will take a week. It will take weeks or even months, we will reach all places.”

Avi Dichter, Israel’s minister of agriculture, declared, “We are now actually rolling out the Gaza Nakba,” a reference to the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestinians to create the state of Israel.

“Now we all have one common goal — erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth,” Nissim Vaturi, the deputy speaker of the Knesset and member of the Foreign Affairs and Security Committee proclaimed.

Israel’s Strategy to Defeat South Africa’s Case

Image
U.S. President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meeting in Tel Aviv on Oct. 18, 2023. (White House, Cameron Smith)

Israel and its chief patron, the United States, understand the magnitude of South Africa’s ICJ application, and they are livid.

Israel usually thumbs its nose at international institutions, but it is taking South Africa’s case seriously. In 2021, when the International Criminal Court launched an investigation into Israel’s alleged war crimes in Gaza, Israel firmly rejected the legitimacy of the probe.

“Israel generally doesn’t participate in such proceedings,” Professor Eliav Lieblich, an international law expert at Tel Aviv University, told Haaretz.

“But this isn’t a UN inquiry commission or the International Criminal Court in the Hague, whose authority Israel rejects. It’s the International Court of Justice, which derives its powers from a treaty Israel joined, so it can’t reject it on the usual grounds of lack of authority. It’s also a body with international prestige.”

[See Craig Murray: Activating the Genocide Convention; Craig Murray: Stopping Genocide and Craig Murray: A Shift Against Impunity for Genocide]

A Jan. 4 cable from the Israeli Foreign Ministry says that Israel’s “strategic goal” is that the ICJ reject South Africa’s request for an injunction to suspend Israel’s military action in Gaza, refuse to find that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and rule that Israel is complying with international law.

“A ruling by the court could have significant potential implications that are not only in the legal world but have practical bilateral, multilateral, economic, security ramifications,” the cable states.

“We ask for an immediate and unequivocal public statement along the following lines: To publicly and clearly state that YOUR COUNTRY rejects the outragest [sic], absurd and baseless allegations made against Israel.”

Image
Israel’s embassy in Berlin. (Peter Kuley, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

The cable instructs Israeli embassies to urge diplomats and politicians at the highest levels “to publicly acknowledge that Israel is working [together with international actors] to increase the humanitarian aid to Gaza, as well as to minimize damage to civilians, while acting in self defense after the horrible October 7th attack by a genocidal terrorist organization.”

“The State of Israel will appear before the ICJ at The Hague to dispel South Africa’s absurd blood libel,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spokesperson Eylon Levy declared. South Africa’s application is “without legal merit and constitutes a base exploitation and contempt of court,” he said.

Israel is pulling out all the stops, including disingenuous accusations of “blood libel,” an anti-Semitic trope that erroneously accuses Jews of the ritual sacrifice of Christian children.

“How tragic that the rainbow nation that prides itself on fighting racism will be fighting pro-bono for anti-Jewish racists,” Levy added ironically. He made the astonishing claim that Israel’s military campaign to destroy Hamas in Gaza is designed to prevent the genocide of the Jews.

As the old adage goes, when you’re being run out of town, get in front of the crowd and act like you’re leading the parade.

The Biden regime rose to defend its staunch ally Israel. U.S. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby lambasted South Africa’s ICJ application as “meritless, counterproductive and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.”

Kirby claimed, “Israel is not trying to wipe the Palestinian people off the map. Israel is not trying to wipe Gaza off the map. Israel is trying to defend itself against a genocidal terrorist threat,” echoing Israel’s preposterous assertion.

Image
John Kirby in 2021. (DOD/Carlos M. Vazquez II)

Kirby’s contention that Israel is trying to prevent genocide is particularly absurd, given that since Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis on Oct. 7, Israeli forces have killed at least 22,100 Gazans, about 9,100 of whom are children. At least 57,000 persons have been wounded and at least 7,000 are reported missing. Untold numbers of people are trapped beneath the rubble.

Provisional Measures for Immediate Impact

South Africa is requesting that the ICJ order provisional measures (interim injunction) in order to “protect against further, severe and irreparable harm to the rights of the Palestinian people under the Genocide Convention.”

South Africa is also asking the court “to ensure Israel’s compliance with its obligations under the Genocide Convention not to engage in genocide, and to prevent and to punish genocide.”

The provisional measures South Africa seeks include ordering Israel to “immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza” and to cease and desist from killing and causing serious bodily or mental harm to Palestinians, inflicting on them conditions of life intended to destroy them in whole or in part, and imposing measures to prevent Palestinian births.

South Africa wants the ICJ to order that Israel stop expelling and forcibly displacing Palestinians and depriving them of food, water, fuel, and medical supplies and assistance.

The judicial arm of the United Nations, the ICJ is composed of 15 judges elected for a nine-year term by the U.N. General Assembly and the Security Council. It is not a criminal tribunal like the International Criminal Court; rather it resolves disputes between countries.

If a party to the Genocide Convention believes that another party has failed to comply with its obligations, it can take that country to the ICJ to determine its responsibility. This was done in the case of Bosnia v. Serbia, in which the Court found that Serbia violated its duties to prevent and punish genocide under the Convention.

The obligations in the Genocide Convention are erga omnes partes, that is, obligations owed by a state towards all the states parties to the Convention. The ICJ has stated,

“In such a convention the contracting States do not have any interests of their own; they merely have, one and all, a common interest, namely, the accomplishment of those high purposes which are the raison d’être of the Convention.”

Article 94 of the U.N. Charter says that all parties to a dispute must comply with the decisions of the ICJ and if a party fails to do so, the other party may go to the U.N. Security Council for the enforcement of the decision.

An average ICJ case from start to finish can last several years (it was nearly 15 years from the time that Bosnia first filed its case against Serbia in 1993 to the issuance of the final judgment on the merits in 2007).

However, a case can have an immediate impact. The filing of a case in the ICJ sends a strong message to Israel that the international community will not tolerate its actions and seeks to hold it accountable.

Provisional measures can be issued quickly. For example, the ICJ ordered measures 19 days after the Bosnian case was initiated. Provisional measures are binding on the party against whom they are ordered, and compliance with them can be monitored by both the ICJ and the Security Council.

Judgments on the merits rendered by the ICJ in disputes between parties are binding on the parties involved. Article 94 of the United Nations Charter provides that “each Member of the United Nations undertakes to comply with the decision of [the Court] in any case to which it is a party.” The judgments of the court are final; there is no appeal.

Public hearings on South Africa’s request for provisional measures will take place this Thursday and Friday at the ICJ which is located in the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands.

The hearings will be livestreamed from 4:00-6:00 a.m. Eastern/1:00-3:00 a.m. Pacific on the Court’s website and on U.N. Web TV. The court could order provisional measures within a week after the hearings.

Other States Can Join

Image
South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, Sept. 19, 2023. (UN Photo/Loey Felipe)

Other states parties to the Genocide Convention can either request permission to intervene in the case filed by South Africa or file their own applications against Israel in the ICJ.

South Africa’s application identifies several countries that have referred to Israel’s genocide in Gaza. They include Algeria, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Iran, Palestine, Türkiye, Venezuela, Bangladesh, Egypt, Honduras, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Pakistan and Syria.

On Jan. 5, Quds News Network tweeted,

“Jordan’s minister of Foreign Affairs, Ayman Safadi, announces that his country backs South Africa’s genocide case against Israel in the ICJ. He added that the Jordanian government is working on a legal file to follow up on the case. Turkey, Malaysia, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) had announced that they back the case too.”

The newly formed International Coalition to Stop Genocide in Palestine, endorsed by more than 600 groups throughout the world, has convened to urge states parties to invoke the Genocide Convention.

The coalition contends,

“Declarations of Intervention in support of South Africa’s invocation of the Genocide Convention against Israel will increase the likelihood that a positive finding of the crime of genocide will be enforced by the United Nations such that actions will be taken to end all acts of genocide and those who are responsible for the acts will be held accountable.”

[See: US Citizens Push Embassies to Back SA’s Genocide Charge]

During the first week of January, delegations of “grassroots diplomats,” spearheaded by CODEPINK, World Beyond War and RootsAction, mounted a campaign across the United States urging nations to submit Declarations of Intervention in South Africa’s case against Israel in the ICJ.

Activists traveled to 12 cities, visiting U.N. missions, embassies and consulates from Colombia, Pakistan, Bolivia, Bangladesh, the African Union, Ghana, Chile, Ethiopia, Turkey, Belize, Brazil, Denmark, France, Honduras, Ireland, Spain, Greece, Mexico, Italy, Haiti, Belgium, Kuwait, Malaysia and Slovakia.

“This is the rare case where collective social pressure urging governments to support the South African case can be a sharp turning point for Palestine,” said Lamis Deek, a Palestinian attorney based in New York, whose firm convened the Palestinian Assembly for Liberation’s Commission on War Crimes Justice, Reparations, and Return. “We need more states to file supporting interventions — and we need the court to feel the watchful eye of the masses so as to withstand what will be extreme U.S. political pressure on the Court.”

Suzanne Adely, president of the National Lawyers Guild, noted, “The increasing global isolation of Israel and the U.S. and their European allies is an indicator that this is a key moment for popular movements to move their governments in the direction of taking these steps and being on the right side of history.”

Indeed, since Oct. 7, millions of people throughout the world have marched, protested and demonstrated in support of Palestinian liberation.

RootsAction and World Beyond War have created a template that organizations and individuals can use to urge other states parties to the Genocide Convention to file a Declaration of Intervention in South Africa’s genocide case against Israel in the ICJ.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/01/09/i ... rld-court/

********

US making huge oil fortune from conflict in Middle East
BEIJING NEWS | Updated: 2024-01-10 06:54

Image
The sun sets behind an oil pump. [Photo/Agencies].

The crude oil exports of the United States surged from 3.915 million barrels per day to 5.292 million barrels per day in the last week of 2023, an increase of 1.3 million barrels, largely as the result of the fighting in the Middle East and its spillover effects, especially Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea, which have caused some countries to import oil from the US to cut oil costs and reduce risks.

Some analysts point out the chaos in the Middle East is pushing customers into the embrace of US oil producers and predict the US' crude oil exports will hit a record high in the coming weeks.

The Suez Canal has long been an important transit route for oil transport from the Persian Gulf to the rest of the world. However, the shipping crisis in the Red Sea emanating from the protracted Gaza conflict has forced many cargo ships to choose alternative routes, causing not only transport delays but also increased costs. A report from Standard& Poor's Global Ratings believes that shipping via the Cape of Good Hope could increase transport costs by at least 15 percent. In this context, it is more cost-effective for shipping companies to send cargo ships to the US Gulf Coast and buy US oil.

The war in the Middle East is the direct cause of the current surge in US crude oil exports, but over a longer time horizon, US oil exports have generally maintained an upward trend. Since the US lifted a ban on oil exports in 2015, its oil exports have set new records almost every year, except for 2020 and 2021 when oil export growth stagnated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This is related to the US' shale gas revolution in 2015, which has increased its oil production efficiency and boosted its competitiveness in the international oil market.

After the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out, the US filled the market vacuum left by Western sanctions on Russia's oil exports. In 2022 and 2023 when the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries negotiated a joint production cut to raise oil prices, the US did the opposite, contributing to the long-term expansion of its oil export share.

In the context of the crisis in the Red Sea shipping lanes, US oil exporters have become the biggest winner, but this "windfall" will not last. Realizing oil imports from the US are unsustainable, even some US allies such as Germany and other European countries have signed long-term oil and gas supply contracts with Qatar, Egypt and other countries.

The US' own huge demand also limits its ability to sell more oil to other countries. Oil transport from the Persian Gulf to Europe and East Asia via the traditional Suez-Red Sea route enjoys unparalleled cost advantages and when geopolitical conflicts in the Middle East end, the oil export windfall the US has reaped will disappear.

http://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/20240 ... 7b6c0.html

*******

Ronnie Kasrils on South Africa parallels and the Palestinian liberation struggle

‘I support right of all oppressed people to resist, and to resist armed oppression with armed resistance,’ says former minister.
Ronnie Kasrils

Wednesday 10 January 2024

Image

The right and duty of the Palestinian people to resist their oppressors is clear and internationally recognised. And increasing numbers of people around the world are now waking up to the terrible lies that have been told to them by imperialist and zionist media in the cause of protecting the settler-colonial project of Israel.

The following article, a reply to a scurrilous attack by western security-aligned commentator Greg Mills in South Africa’s Daily Maverick, is reproduced from Politics Web, with thanks. The author is a communist and was a founding commander of Umkhonto we Sizwe, the armed wing of the African National Congress (ANC). He later served as a minister in the South African government from 1994-2008.

*****

Greg Mills accuses me of having no “moral compass” because I support the right of all oppressed people to resist, and to resist armed oppression with armed resistance. My principles are universal, they apply in all situations. In the same way I oppose all forms of racism. Naturally this includes antisemitism which is a form of racism.

Mills, however, appears indifferent to the lives of Palestinians, and other muslims. He has been directly involved in imperialist oppression, and remains complicit with it. In 2006, he was a special advisor to the commander of the Nato forces occupying Afghanistan.

Today, the board of the Brenthurst Foundation that Mills directs includes Richard Myers, the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff in the USA, and Nick Carter, the former chief of the defence staff in the United Kingdom. Myers and Carter both took leading roles in the destruction of Iraq following the invasion led by the USA in 2003.

The destruction of Iraq, at the price of over a million lives, is widely recognised as a war crime, and yet Mills happily consorts with perpetrators of the most horrific war crime in a generation. He does not show an ounce of the concern he lavishes on the lives of people in Israel and Ukraine for the lives of Iraqis and other Arabs. His racism is rank.

I oppose all forms of racism, support the right of all people living under military occupation to armed resistance, and opposed and regret all loss of civilian life. I hold these principles without regard to the race of the oppressor or the oppressed.

Mills does not engage with the situation in Gaza or the West Bank with any factual rigour, and the same is true of his attack on myself, where he wholly ignores the context of my remarks. For instance, he says that Hamas has an “ideology to eliminate Israel and Israelis” and uses this claim to compare Hamas to Nazis.

The 2017 Hamas charter, which remains current, clearly states that it is in conflict “with the zionist project not with the jews” and that it “rejects the persecution of any human being or the undermining of his or her rights on nationalist, religious or sectarian grounds”. It correctly describes the zionist project as a “racist, aggressive, colonial and expansionist project based on seizing the properties of others” and correctly asserts the right of the victims of zionism to take up arms against their oppressors but does not, in any way, call for attacks on jewish people because they are jewish people.

The Hamas charter reveals the Palestinian struggle to be no different to the South African struggle that was waged against the abominations of the apartheid system and colonial dispossession of land – not against whites because they were white.

My personal view is that there should be a single secular democratic state with rights for all – along the lines of post-apartheid South Africa – in the territory of historical Palestine, but the 2017 Hamas charter does not call for the replacement of the Israeli ethnostate with a single inclusive state and clearly accepts a two-state solution with a Palestinian state contiguous with the 1967 borders.

In terms of his attack on myself, Mills takes a statement out of context – always a shortcut for those who decline to stay the course of critical thinking and journalistic integrity.

In an address at a private meeting of approximately 40 trade unionists and activists on 24 November, my words on the success of the military raid on the Israeli Gaza division undertaken by Hamas on 7 October, were as follows:

“They swept on them and they killed them and damn good. I was so pleased, and people who support resistance applauded, absolutely. If we had been able to spring a surprise on the Boers and knock down a hundred of them, the people would have been rejoicing to the rooftops. It’s the struggle, the armed struggle, and in international law, the occupied people are [justified]. It’s accepted international law that they have the right to that kind of resistance.”

In the context of my talk and discussion, I was referring to the Israeli military garrison, cruelly imprisoning the people of Gaza for over 16 years, having tormented and killed thousands in that period – “mowing the lawn” as the IDF phrase describes massacre after massacre.

Palestinians have the same right to armed resistance as black South Africans had under apartheid, and as all oppressed people do. The 7 October raid penetrated the militarised Gaza border followed 16 years of the brutal Gaza siege and a history of oppression going back to 1967 – and, indeed, all the way back to 1947-48. Supporters of the oppressed will always rejoice in their achievements against the oppressor.

At the same time, empathy for any civilian victim is felt. This is felt for civilians who died on 7 October. Such rejoicing is no different to the way in which we celebrate military defeats against every oppressive state – from Nazi Germany to apartheid South Africa – while regretting civilian causalities.

Those who wish to say that all celebration of military success is perverse are silent about the fact that the zionists of what was deemed a ‘jewish resistance movement’ celebrated foul atrocities committed in the founding of a state on land soaked with the blood and tears of its indigenous Palestinian population. They forget that the IDF and settler militias continuously celebrate their abhorrent undertakings growing more brutal by the day – as seen in the wild settler pogroms on the West Bank, in East Jerusalem as in the Gaza genocide.

We may ask who has the true right to celebration: the oppressor or the oppressed?

The 7 October incursion by Hamas and other resistance groups comprised two elements: the legal and justifiable military operation against the IDF and the illegal taking of civilian captives. The latter admittedly a breach of international law but an action holding validity in terms of the intention to secure an exchange for detainees, including women and children, held in Israeli prisons without charge, with little chance of fair trial and under appalling conditions. The offer of an exchange of captives was extended by Hamas within 48 hours of the event.

With regard to the tragedy of violent civilian deaths, completion of the initial phase of military attack was compromised by the music festival, an obstacle to access to command centres. The ensuing carnage was exacerbated by the IDF’s chaotic arrival on the scene – which, as the shooting of three Israeli hostages by Israeli soldiers on 15 December showed, is far from a model of military efficiency.

Increasing witness accounts and information from IDF and intelligence personnel reveal a need for independent investigation in the interests of equitable apportionment of blame among the IDF, al-Qassam brigades, other armed groups and the crowd that poured through the breached Gaza fence.

Unfortunately, much evidence has been lost or intentionally removed. But we do know that the resistance fighters were armed with light arms, RPGs and grenades – weapons that could not destroy hundreds of vehicles or demolish buildings.

The purpose of the military attack on IDF installations and taking of captives certainly did not entail carrying fuel canisters, as per Mr Mills’s assumption that arson was on the to-do list. Allegations of depravities committed against women in particular likewise require a measure of explanation. Claims of mass rape and disembowelment, along with accounts of 40 beheaded babies, a baby cooked in an oven, chopping off of limbs and bodies bound together for burning alive have been authoritatively dismissed as simple propaganda.

Having suffered the humiliation of a serious military defeat during the initial phase of the incursion, Israel has elected to divert attention to the second phase, during which the massacres occurred. However, disclosures to Israeli media reveal the carnage to have ensued as a result of the actions not only of different groups of resistance fighters but particularly those of the IDF, which applied the Hannibal directive in indiscriminate usage of missiles and shells fired from attack helicopters and tanks.

It remains to be seen whether the self-proclaimed “most moral army in the world” finds the modicum of courage required to admit to extensive culpability for the civilian deaths on 7 October.

Israeli retaliation for the attack was inevitable. But the world has been left aghast at the disproportionate response: the ongoing genocide, ethnic cleansing, starvation, collective punishment, relentless bombing, obliteration of civilian infrastructure and residential areas, wilful destruction of hospitals overflowing with wounded who have to be treated under horrific conditions, extermination of healthcare workers and journalists, coldblooded sniper fire and detention of individuals, hooded and stripped to their underwear, who are disappeared and subjected to torture.

The unprecedented global objection to the atrocities wrought against the Palestinians indicates that the tectonic plates of geopolitics are shifting. In the United States, most younger people, including very many younger jews, no longer support Israel. However, Mr Mills has not been able to wean himself from the imperialist interests of the west, over which the USA reigns supreme. Some might refer to him as a propagandist.

Moreover, his article is a diatribe, not only against me but the multitudes of previously oppressed South Africans who share my views.

It’s a sorry state of affairs that so much of his article comprises a derogatory ad hominem attack. Personal insult and a crudely intemperate tone typify a deficit of valid argument.

Mills has succumbed to the lure of what can only be described as malevolently hysterical zionist fabrication and hasn’t taken the trouble to study the 2017 Hamas charter, or the strong criticisms made of the recent conduct of the Israeli state and its military in the Israeli media.

The Palestinian struggle is not waged against zionism because zionists are jewish but against zionism because it is the imposition of a monstrous dispensation, which jews of conscience around the world oppose. Israel’s claim to the right of an oppressor to defend itself perpetuates a singularly inhumane dispensation in the form of land seizures, military occupation, settlement expansion, vandalism, violence, expulsion, massacres, surveillance, arbitrary checkpoints, illegal detention, more than 65 discriminatory laws against Palestinians within the 1948 borders, the apartheid wall and constant harassment, intimidation and humiliation.

As a jew who grew up in the 1940s, my blood chills at comparative images of Nazi behaviour.

Antisemitism is racism.
Zionism is racism.
The Israeli state is a structurally and viciously racist state.
Those who stand against racism, must simultaneously stand against antisemitism, zionism and the Israeli state.


https://thecommunists.org/2024/01/10/ne ... -struggle/

******

NATO Disproves Its Own Lies That Syria, South Lebanon & Gaza Are Narco States

Declan Hayes

January 9, 2024

Syria and state and non-state actors allied to it are the heroes in the wars currently raging across the Fertile Crescent, aka the Axis of Resistance.

You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies. John 8:44.

NATO’s recent articles and actions validate not only my 21st December 2022 piece that the Syrian Arab Republic and state and non-state actors allied to it are not narco peddlers but that they and not their NATO adversaries are the heroes in the wars currently raging across the Fertile Crescent, aka the Axis of Resistance.

Chief amongst those NATO actions are attacks by the Royal Jordanian Air Force on what they alleged are major captagon factories in Sweida in Southern Syria. The significance of that is Sweida is largely controlled by the Druze, for whom it is a very major place of pilgrimage. As the Druze are also prominent in Northern Israel, the Golan Heights and on the Lebanese side of the Syrian Lebanese border, they have long been in the cross hairs of Mossad, MI6, the CIA and the various terrorist proxy groups and state actors they control. If the Druze of Sweida could be importuned to switch their allegiance from the Syrian Republic to one or other of the Mossad controlled rebel groups, then Damascus’ writ would be in very serious trouble indeed. It is through that over-arching NATO lens that Jordan’s latest bout of adventurism must be viewed.

If we assume that the Jordanians did indeed hit captagon factories, those factories could not have been under the autonomous control of either the Syrian Army or Hezbollah that MI6’s Chatham House, along with their running dogs in the BBC and allied NATO media, have long linked to this trade. Whatever chance rogue elements in the Syrian Army or Hezbollah would have of producing captagon under the radar in other parts of Syria, they would have absolutely none of doing it on the Druze’ turf, which is riven with its own long running Mossad inspired intrigues.

Let’s now switch to NATO’s war of words and, in particular to this key article on the finances of Hamas from The Economist which, along with the BBC, is NATO’s pre-eminent MI6 media outlet. Leaving their flowery English and the James Bond settings to one side, we are told that “Hamas has three sources of power: its physical force inside Gaza, the reach of its ideas and its income” and that “Israel’s declared goal of destroying Hamas for good requires its financial base to be dismantled”.

NATO’s objective is to smash the armies of Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria, to eviscerate them as an intellectual, or moral force and to deprive them of the necessary funds which The Economist tells us, in the case of Hamas, “pays for everything from schoolteachers’ salaries to missiles”.

If we first of all note that that makes “schoolteachers’ salaries”, along with those of nurses, hairdressers, ambulance drivers and seamstresses legitimate targets, we are told that “the easiest source of cash for Israel to strangle”, about a third of Hamas’s total, is taxes Hamas exacts on produce entering Gaza from Egypt.

Great! So the more Israel bombs the sewage facilities of Syria, Lebanon and Gaza, the less money there is for Hamas and the others to “squander” on fighting diseases, feeding children and launching missiles. The fact that captagon is being produced in Syria (as well as in Sicily and Saudi Arabia) helps to give Mossad, along with the Jordanian and Israeli Air Forces, the moral high ground and the licence to bomb the Druze, as they both have repeatedly done over the last decade. It is that high moral ground that allows Mossad’s Haaertz outlet to praise Israel’s serial criminality “against money mules” they assassinate in Beirut and Qatar and for White House National Security Council apologist for genocide, John Kirby, to say that South Africa’s 84-page suit accusing Israel of genocide is “meritless, counterproductive, and completely without any basis in fact whatsoever.” In the lying minds of Kirby and cretins like him, there can only be NATO-aligned goodies like Mossad and NATO-maligned baddies like Hamas et al, who flood the Mossad controlled Western world with narcotics.

But back to The Economist which reckons Hamas get the lion’s share of their funds “from friendly governments, the biggest of which is Iran”. The task then for those who hold NATO’s high moral ground, for the Americans, the Israelis and the various head hacking terror groups they control is to interdict that flow of funds from Iran to Gaza (Syria and Lebanon). Forget that Hamas, in its current incarnation, is mostly a child of the Shiaphobic Muslim Brotherhood but concentrate here on the main objective which, in the words of the late serial American war criminal John McCain, is to bomb, bomb bomb Iran, Iran being like Putin’s Russia, the source of all the evil in this world the CIA and its ISIS aligned terror groupings so selflessly and valiantly battle against.

The Economist then goes on to claim, perhaps correctly, that “the lion’s share of Hamas’s money—at least $500m a year, say Israeli officials—comes from its investments, some of which are firms registered in countries across the Middle East”. In other words, Hamas, like Hezbollah and the Syrian government, have legitimate businesses that reinvest their profits into resisting their enemies slaughtering their women and children rather than living the high life chomping on prawn sandwiches with long-legged Ukrainian floozies in Dubai.

Contradicting themselves by proving the point that the Muslim Brotherhood is at the heart of Hamas, the Economist goes on to say how Turkey and Qatar, both of which are Muslim Brotherhood strongholds, are the main hubs through which Hamas conducts its financial affairs. The article, which oozes faux tears for Israel’s innocent victims, concludes that “while Gazans have been plunged into tragedy, Hamas’s money is safely ensconced elsewhere—and its financiers can eat lobster as they gaze across the Bosporus”.

So, the solution is clear. Send Mossad agents into Istanbul and Doha and assassinate any and all “Gazans gazing across the Bosporus” whilst vacuously chomping their way through lobster laden platters, which the Gazans NATO slaughter would otherwise be eating, along with the local water NATO has deliberately poisoned.

Job done. Game, set and match to the good guys. Unless that is, we also forget the first two legs that Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas all stand on. Those are, firstly, their military power, which doesn’t directly concern us here and, secondly and far more importantly, “the reach of their ideas,” the likes of which have no parallels or precedents in the modern world.

The sad truth, for NATO and its Israeli forward base, is that the Fertile Crescent has an increasingly robust Axis of Resistance. And, though Mossad, MI6 and the CIA can get their various think tanks here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here to lie till the cows come home that Hezbollah, Hamas, the Syrian Army and the Axis’ other key players are narco traffickers, that just does not compute with what the Israelis call facts on the ground.

Those facts are that NATO are committing genocide in Gaza, just as they have committed similar outrages in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Iran, countries they have and never had any business attacking or being in. The human targets in that Fertile Crescent have decided, even at the cost of everyone and everything they hold dear, to stand four square behind that Axis of Resistance until the tides of blood and human misery are stemmed, which they will be, even if the Israelis and their Royal Jordanian lackeys kill every last Palestinian on the face of the earth.

And, even though basic statistical probability tells us that Hamas, Hezbollah and the Syrian Army must have rogues in their ranks, the situation is such that opening the door to Mossad by dealing in captogen would be a one-way ticket to the hereafter. We are not here talking about quasi criminal opportunists like the IRA, who left opportunities aplenty for MI6 and the CIA to infiltrate and undermine them but of a large cohort of Arabs, whose conscience leaves them no other choice than to pin their colours to their respective masts.

Though NATO’s imperialist campaigns against them were built on the tried and trusted means of dividing, conquering and endlessly smearing them with the foulest of libels, the sacrifices of Israel’s civilian victims in Gaza, the West Bank and all along the Axis of Resistance have shredded the supposedly higher moral standing of Israel and NATO into a billion or more parts that will never again coagulate in any fair-minded person’s mind.

Although it is now 2024, ten years since I first reached Homs and the Qalamoun Hills which Hezbollah and the heroes of the Syrian Arab Army had only recently liberated from the still unspeakable horrors the Muslim Brotherhood, there is one very pertinent memory I will share of Homs, which I entered just ahead of a gaggle of Western show boaters when, in the company of a very prominent Arab journalist, a young boy told me that I, along with all those other Westerners, would twist their testimony into its converse.

Although I spent much of the interceding ten years treating those NATO Holocaust enablers like the contemptible scum that they are, NATO’s rivers of blood through Syria, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, Libya and Palestine can now no more be denied than can we deny the existence of any other of the world’s great oceans or mountain ranges; the sheer scale of these atrocities is too big for anyone but White House creeps like John Kirby and his parrots at The Economist to deny. The perpetrators of these massacres, meanwhile, folk like Blair, Bush, Blinken, Netanyahu and Nuland must be concerned when the blood of all those innocents they had slaughtered inexorably seeps ever closer to them for there is, along with that slowly moving crimson tide, a day of reckoning, inching ever closer to these serial liars that I and millions more like me in the Axis of Resistance hope and pray will wash them and the lies that underwrite them away for ever.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... co-states/

********

Hybrid War in the Red Sea
January 9, 21:39

Image

Hybrid War in the Red Sea

In the Middle East, the confrontation between the Israel-US-West and Hamas-Tehran-Yemen coalitions is becoming increasingly global.

The efforts of the international coalition to prevent the powerful campaign of the Yemeni Houthis to undermine supply chains in the Red Sea have not yet led to any positive results for the West. The Houthi fighters, with the support of IRGC intelligence, manage to avoid almost any serious clash with the coalition fleet and plan their attacks in a safe direction. The attacks threatened shipping in the Suez Canal, causing many leading shipping companies to suspend operations in the region and create new routes around the Cape of Good Hope, leading to significant delays in shipments and increased financial costs, including a sharp jump in costs cargo insurance.

The strain threatens global supply lines already struggling to recover from pandemic restrictions. The Iran-backed Houthi operation could catalyze catastrophic economic consequences for Western multinationals on multiple continents. For example, when the Ever Given cargo ship became stuck in the Suez Canal in 2021, companies suffered cumulative losses of $10 billion per day. The situation in the Red Sea is several orders of magnitude more serious. Maintaining free navigation and control over maritime supply lines is one of the main pillars of the American economy, and in this region the United States cannot yet oppose anything to the Iranians and Houthis, incurring enormous economic costs.

The Houthis’ information operations indicate that this “movement,” in coordination with Iran, is deliberately positioning itself as the most active participant in the so-called. "axis of resistance". Between November 19 and December 31 last year, the Houthis carried out 23 successful attacks on Israeli-linked shipping. And these are the greatest results of all parties supporting Palestine, both economically and informationally.

At the same time, Iranian support allows the Houthis to give a serious asymmetric response to the Western Navy using high-precision anti-ship missiles and UAVs. At the moment, the Houthis are armed with the Asef anti-ship missile (Iranian Fateh-313 anti-ship missile) and the Tankel anti-ship missile (Iranian Raad-500 Zohair ballistic anti-ship missile), modifications of these missiles allow them to reach speeds of up to Mach 5. The range allows the Yemeni Houthis to hold Western forces at a safe distance from themselves.The concentrated launch of these missiles at a target, supported by strikes from loitering ammunition, significantly increases the chances of hitting American ships in the Red Sea.

The Iranian Navy ship Behshad, which is officially registered as a cargo ship, provides intelligence support to the Houthis. Its equipment makes it possible to track all the movements of American ships in the Red Sea. Intelligence in this confrontation is crucial, where all targets are mobile and their defeat is difficult. The Iranians also brought their frigate Alborz, equipped with hypersonic anti-ship missiles, into the waters to support the Yemenis. Against this background, the Western coalition has not yet been able to develop an effective mechanism to confront the Iranians and their proxies. At the same time, the main players in the region, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, did not join the coalition; of all the countries in the Middle East region, only the leaders of Bahrain supported the US action.

As the efforts of the "axis of resistance" in the region become clearer, it can be assumed that the plan is to force multinational corporations, at enormous financial cost, to put pressure on the US government to reduce support for Israel. It seems to us that American businessmen love money more than Israel.

https://t.me/neinsider/5836 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8884073.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Jan 11, 2024 12:37 pm

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 10
January 10, 2024
Rybar

Image

In the central part of the Gaza Strip, clashes are taking place in the Al-Brej camp area . In the south, the IDF is advancing in Khan Yunis , and in the north - in Gaza itself and its environs - cleansing continues and search activities are underway.

There has been a relative calm on the Lebanese border following intense exchanges of attacks over the past few days, although shelling continues. In Kafr Kil, a civilian was killed as a result of an IDF attack; Hezbollah once again announced a serious response.

In the West Bank, raids are underway to search for and detain Palestinians associated with Hamas, as well as clashes in many populated areas. The Palestinians are consistently reporting civilians and ordinary demonstrators injured as a result of indiscriminate fire, while the Israelis are finding dozens of IEDs and small arms.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

Despite the formal end of the operation, the IDF continues to undermine various objects in previously occupied territories. Pro-Palestinian sources reported the destruction of several buildings in Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun . In addition, there are raids to search for Hamas infrastructure and militants, which are not always successful.

Kataib Izz al-Din al-Qassam reported a successful ambush on IDF forces in the Sheikh al-Radwan area . A group of Israeli infantry was lured into an underground passage and blown up. The footage, however, only confirms a shootout in one of the dungeons.

Center of the Gaza Strip

In the central part of the enclave, clashes continue on the outskirts of the Al-Breij camp . No significant advances have been recorded; apparently, the IDF is clearing the surrounding areas in preparation for the assault on the populated area. At the same time, artillery and aviation are operating against Palestinian-controlled al-Maghazi , Deir al-Balah , Az-Zawaida and the Nuseirat camp .

As part of the search activities, IDF units discovered a house allegedly belonging to Marwan Issa , deputy head of Hamas' military wing, Muhammad Deif . The main message of Israeli propaganda is that all Palestinians live in hell, and the top officials of Hamas live in heaven. Although the 40x40 meter plot on the bank of the Besor stream with a country road doesn’t really look like “paradise”. Even taking into account the gazebo and pool.

The owner of the country house was not there, which Israeli channels also wrote about with some sadness. However, it would be strange to expect one of the key figures of Hamas’s military wing to sit in his dacha at a time when, without exaggeration, the fate of, if not Palestine, then the Gaza Strip is being decided. Even if this is really his dacha, what should he do there? Cut out figures from wood?

South Gaza Strip

Image
In the south, the Israelis continue to advance and clear Khan Yunis . Part of the city and the southeastern suburbs are still shrouded in the “fog of war,” but relative progress is being recorded in the central part.


Palestinian militias occasionally report mixed-caliber mortar attacks on the al-Mahatta area in the northeast of the city, as well as fighting in the al-Ma'an and Jurat al-Lot areas . In the latter, the Israelis advanced as far as the Khalid ibn Al-Walid Mosque in the nearby Al-Batna Al-Samin area .


In the southwest, on the outskirts of the Al-Ma'an district, the building of the Khan Yunis Islamic University came under the control of IDF units , where a small amount of small arms was found.

No progress has yet been recorded on the part of Khirbet Khuzaa and Khuzaa . It is likely that the IDF command either postponed the formation of the pocket in Abasan , or intends to simply push the groups out of the settlements southeast of Khan Yunis.

Air strikes continue on various settlements in the south of the enclave. In the Tal al-Sultan area of ​​Rafah , an IDF strike killed civilians, including a journalist from one of the local publications. However, taking into account over a hundred reporters who died, it is unlikely that this will bother anyone much.

Border with Lebanon

Image
IDF artillery shelled the outskirts of Yarin , Ad-Dahira , Jibain and Teir Harfa . An IDF UAV fired two missiles at the southern outskirts of the village of Kafr Qila , and the outskirts of An-Nakura and Kafr Shuba were also attacked from a drone . The settlement of Marvakhin was hit by a strike UAV twice, and an artillery strike was carried out on the outskirts. In addition, Israeli artillery continues to fire incendiary bombs into forests in the Labuneh area south of An-Nakura .

In the evening , a civilian killed in an early morning strike was discovered in Kafr Kil . Probably in this regard, Hezbollah announced a certain statement regarding the protection of the civilian population of Lebanon, about 50 thousand of whom have already become refugees amid the aggravation on the Lebanese-Israeli border.

West Bank

In the Palestinian Authority, since yesterday evening, the IDF has been conducting operations in various localities almost around the clock. In Shuafat , Ramallah and Hebron , Palestinian youth threw stones at Israelis, and in the Balata camp near Nablus and Jenin , clashes escalated into gunfire and IED explosions.

The IDF carried out its largest operation in Jenin . Judging by reports from pro-Palestinian sources, the goal was the destruction of various infrastructure and commercial areas. At the same time, local resistance forces managed to detonate several IEDs along the route of Israeli forces.

The first explosion occurred on Route 60 north of Jenin , and the second on the city's main roundabout near a cinema, where a shootout ensued. In addition, Palestinian channels reported Israeli air activity, and power was cut off in several areas of the city. According to the Israeli report, more than 80 IEDs were discovered in Jenin.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

US Central Command (CENTCOM) reported repelling the largest Houthi attack since the conflict began in October. On the night of January 9–10 , 21 air targets launched by the Houthis in the southern Red Sea were intercepted . The Ansarallah group launched 18 UAVs, two cruise and one ballistic anti-ship missiles.

The interception involved four American and one British destroyer HMS Diamond . The incident occurred 50 nautical miles west of Hodeidah .

A statement by Houthi spokesman Yahya Sari later appeared . The combined attack on American ships is in response to a “treacherous attack” on the Yemeni Navy, which was engaged in “obstructing the passage of Israeli ships.” According to Sari, Yemen will continue to interfere with shipping in the interests of Israel and will also react harshly to hostile actions.

Apparently, in the near future we should expect new attacks both on the ships of the international coalition and on the territory of Yemen. And this, in turn, will escalate the already difficult situation in the Red Sea, where it is gradually becoming crowded with warships from various countries.

The high density of Iran's sworn friends in the form of Operation Guardian of Prosperity coalition vessels will only give the Houthis more freedom in choosing their targets. But as practice has shown, Ansarallah is not too afraid of airstrikes, and at the moment there is no one to carry out a ground operation (and there is no need: so far the collective West is only benefiting from the operation and the actions of the Houthis ).

Pro-Iranian proxies in Iraq continue to regularly report attacks on various US targets in the region. Once again, the Konoco plant was hit by a missile , and a base west of Qamishli airport in Syria was attacked by an undisclosed weapon . In Iraq, kamikaze UAVs attacked a facility near Erbil airport .

Political-diplomatic background
On the Chinese Foreign Ministry's calls for peace.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry called on the parties for a comprehensive and immediate ceasefire and compliance with UN Security Council resolutions, and Israel called on them to stop collective punishment of the residents of Gaza . By and large, this is a routine statement that does not carry any special consequences.

It was probably made against the backdrop of recent news about the discovery of Chinese weapons in the Gaza Strip in order to somewhat distance themselves from Hamas. However, given the prevalence and low cost of Chinese copies of Kalashnikovs, it is unlikely that anyone will seriously blame the PRC for supporting the Palestinians.

About the debate in the US Congress about aid to Israel

US Senator Tim Kaine announced his intention to introduce an amendment to the bill on additional funding for US national security. The amendment requires that Congress be kept informed about aid transferred to Israel , since taxpayers have a right to know when and to which country American weapons are transferred.

It would be strange to see anti-Semitism in this. It is more likely that the gesture is related to the internal struggle of American arms companies , which, on the one hand, do not care who supplies ammunition for money. However, on the other hand, from Israel , unlike Ukraine , it is much more difficult to get some additional bonuses.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

Israel’s Backers Play Blind, Deaf and Dumb While Journalists Pay With Blood in Gaza

Image
The killing continues while talks continue in frozen spaces and the war heats-up inside Gaza, on the West Bank, on Israel’s borders with Lebanon and Syria. Jan. 8, 2024. | Photo: X

Published 8 January 2024

The targeted killing brought to 109 Palestinian journalists and media workers killed while bringing the truth on Gaza to light.


The world awoke on Sunday January 7, 2024 at the start of the third month of Israel’s latest war on Palestine, not to the expected sum-total of deaths, destruction and displacement after 13 weeks of relentless carpet-bombing of Gaza, but to the sad news that yet-another two Palestinian journalists were killed.

This time it was Hamza Al Dahdouh, son of Al Jazeera News Network’s Gaza Bureau Chief Wael Al Dahdouh and AFP journalist Mustapha Thuraya, close friends and colleagues who died side-by-side, killed by a drone attack while driving to an assignment.

The targeted killing brought to 109 Palestinian journalists and media workers killed while bringing the truth on Gaza to light.

Wael and the Al Dahdouh family had already lost Hamza’s mother, sister, brother and nephew -- killed together last October, soon after relocating, under Israeli evacuation orders, to a supposedly ‘safe’ zone.

The father-and-son team and the hundreds of other journalists, covered the war and its effects from Gaza, the West Bank, East Jerusalem and other occupied Palestinian territories.


The Al Jazeera bureau chief had earlier lost his wife and daughter, son and grandson – and now his eldest son – and retrieved other dead members of his extended family, by hand, from under rubble of their bombed home.

Wael had encouraged Hamza -- his first child -- to pursue a university course in journalism, after which they proudly worked, with other Arab colleagues, to cover the continuing Palestinian horror story – until Hamza’s assassination.

The senior Al Dahdouh has covered Gaza for over two decades and was also recently injured on duty by Israeli bombardments.

Other Al Jazeera colleagues killed thus far include Samer Abu Daqqa, who died after an Israeli attack on a school, while another lost 21 family members also killed by aerial bombardments by night in another supposedly ‘safe’ zone.

But despite losing so many family members in just three months, Wael remains totally committed to continuing in what he proudly describes as the journalist’s “humanitarian mission” of pursuing the truth under all and any circumstances.

Addressing the world’s press minutes after the newsman and his son became the latest story, the mourning father said Hamza was “The soul of my soul” and his were filled with“tears of farewell and sorrow, of humanity and dignity, but not of fear or defeat…” He said he and all other Palestinian journalists had “chosen this road consciously” and while they paid the ultimate price in blood, “we will continue working...”

According to the grieving Al Jazeera bureau chief, “I am bidding farewell to my son like everyone else has been doing every day, hour and minute since October 7,” but insisted their work will continue, no matter the cost.

Wael appealed to “the international community” to do more to restrain Israel’s slaughtering of Palestinians in Gaza and other occupied territories, while hoping his son Hamza “will be the last journalist killed and the last bloodshed in Gaza…”

But journalists aren’t the only ones losing entire families overnight in Gaza.

On the same day Hamza was killed, a group of eight more Palestinians was killed in the Jenin refugee camp -- including four brothers from an extended family -- while warming themselves around an outside fire on that cold winter’s night.

On the morning Hamza and Mustapha were killed, the statistics of death and destruction in Palestine were terrible:

• 23,000 Palestinians killed (255 daily)
• 9,600 children dead (106 daily)
• 7,200 women killed (80 daily)
• 325 Palestinians killed and 5,630 detained in the Occupied West Bank
• 324 health workers killed
• 142 United Nations staff dead
• 8,000 missing under rubble (most feared dead)
• 20,000 children made orphans and 10,000 with permanent life injuries
• 1.1 million children, including babies, facing malnutrition
• 155,000 pregnant and breastfeeding mothers underfed; and
• 2.3 million Gazans without access to water, food, medicine and electricity in the middle of winter.

All of this has played-out 24/7 in the eyes of the world in the past three months, as Gaza was quickly turned into a ‘No Man’s Land’ where no one is safe anywhere and manmade famine is looming over an entire population deprived of daily necessities for 90+ days.

Yet there’s been a deafening silence from the international media and journalists of the world, who normally shout loudly about allegations of human rights violations and violating freedoms of Western journalists in developing nations.

Compare the silence on Gaza and Palestine to world’s response to the Ukraine War, where state actors manipulate information flows to justify continuation of another bloody war.

Billions of U.S. dollars and Euros that can help heal humanity’s hurts continue being poured into Ukraine and Israel, as Western nations support prolongation of an unsustainable mission in Europe and another brutal and costly fight against an invisible enemy -- with impossible objectives -- in Palestine.

As the bombs continued raining on Gaza on the same day the latest journalists were killed, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken arrived in Qatar on his fifth mission to the region since October, to discuss various plans, options and conditions for another longer or permanent ceasefire and possible total prisoner exchange -- which Israel insists will never happen.

Meanwhile, the killing continues while talks continue in frozen spaces and the war heats-up inside Gaza, on the West Bank, on Israel’s borders with Lebanon and Syria – and in the Red Sea – with every sign of expansion to possibly affect and/or involve Turkey, Egypt and Jordan, Yemen and Iran and other players in the Axis of Resistance that also includes Hezbollah, Houthis and several other pro-Palestinian armed factions in the region, before cessation.

And -- as Palestinian and Arab journalists have been commenting from the beginning of the latest war on their homeland -- Israel continues collective punishment with impunity, in the process killing the messengers to stifle the message, while its supporters on the global stage continue to play blind, deaf and dumb.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Isr ... -0014.html

******

HUNGER: ISRAEL'S AMMUNITION FOR WAR AGAINST GAZA
Clara Sanchez

Jan 8, 2024 , 1:56 pm .

Image
A genocide carried out with all the means on the table (Photo: Getty Images)

On October 9, 2023, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, just two days after the escalation of the war between Hamas and Israel, announced: "we are putting a complete siege on Gaza. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, "No gas. Everything will be closed. We are fighting against animals and we act accordingly." Three months later it is reported that more than 90% of the population of the Gaza Strip is in crisis, emergency and food catastrophe , and that is not all.

MORE THAN 90% OF GAZA'S POPULATION IN EXTREME HUNGER

According to a special report from the Integrated Food Safety Phase Classification (ICF or IPC) System of the Food Safety Information Network (SFIN), to which FAO, the World Food Program and others belong, 14 organizations, agencies, NGOs; around 2.08 million people in the Gaza Strip fall within the parameters of extreme hunger: Phase 3 (Crisis), 4 (Emergency) and 5 (Famine or Catastrophe). See image 1.

Image
Image 1. Population with extreme hunger in the Gaza Strip as of December 2023 (Photo: IPC 2023)

Identifying 1.9 million displaced people, relocated to an increasingly smaller area and with restricted access to humanitarian aid.

And it is hostilities, bombings by land, sea and air, ground operations and sieges on the entire Palestinian population without distinction, the main cause of the catastrophic levels of hunger throughout the Gaza Strip.

HUNGER: DEATH NOT ASSOCIATED WITH BOMBINGS
Furthermore, it is the increasing intensification of Israel's hostilities against the Palestinian people, although the report does not dare to identify it, which causes a further reduction in access to food, basic services, vital assistance and concentration of people in shelters. inadequate, it is estimated that by February 2024, 100% of the population in the Gaza Strip will be in crisis, emergency and food catastrophe (see image 1), that is, the more than 2.2 million people who live in this territory 360 km 2 , 41 km long and 6 to 12 km wide, with one side facing the Mediterranean Sea, the other facing Egypt and of course, with Israel in tow. One of the most populated territories in the world and not with animals; of people, of children, women, men, elderly people with the right to have their right to live respected.

Image
Image 2. Estimated increase in the population with extreme hunger in the Gaza Strip from December 2023 to February 2024 (Photo: IPC 2023)

Consequently, if Israel continues with hostilities against the entire population, as it has done until now and confirms that it will last for several months, not only will 100% of the Palestinian people be affected by hunger, almost 80% will be in emergency. food and catastrophe, meaning extreme lack of food, famine, exhaustion of their survival capacities, acute malnutrition and death not associated with trauma from bombings.

Of course, the bombings also affect food production, the destruction of agricultural land, infrastructure, greenhouses, warehouses, restriction of all food trade, and finally, the loss of agricultural, livestock, and fishing means that sustain food. of the population.

A situation that the Palestinian Authority has warned of through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs, asking the United Nations to declare famine in the Gaza Strip. In short, phase 5 of the IPC is declared.

THE URGENCY OF HUMANITARIAN AID THREE MONTHS LATER

As always, humanitarian aid results in the way to address these situations created in the midst of conventional or non-conventional war conflicts, but not before turning them into catastrophes. Proof of this is that when the Israeli Minister of Defense himself pointed out three months ago that would kill the Palestinian people like animals, for example, the European Union, through the European Commissioner for Enlargement Oliver Varhelyi, announced that they would immediately suspend aid to Palestine as a consequence of the escalation of Hamas , later alleging that "the review" sought the objective of preventing humanitarian financing from being used by terrorist organizations against Israel.

While the United States would be in charge of ensuring that the entry of humanitarian aid did not reach the hands of Hamas. A form of support for Israel's version of the generalized blockade against the defenseless civilian population of the Gaza Strip.

During which time, humanitarian aid was retained, retained and will surely continue to be retained on the border between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, of which only 10% of the total that has arrived there allows Israel to be entered to serve to the population it bombs.

Humanitarian aid that in financial terms has been announced by the World Bank through 35 million dollars and the European Union with 118.4 million euros, which are part of a financing package approved for the Palestinian Authority of 1.2 billion euros since 2021 – 2024, while claiming to have quadrupled the disbursement in one year, after three months and having reviewed that it will not be diverted into the hands of Hamas.

Accordingly, the United States provided $121 million in aid to Palestine under the same condition; At the same time, for Israel, President Biden requests from the Congress of the North American nation 14.5 billion dollars in military aid to guarantee its "right" to defend itself, in addition to the 3.8 billion dollars annually that it receives in financing. of the 38 billion dollars from 2018 to 2028, while the United Nations bargains for 1.2 billion dollars for the 2.2 million people of the Gaza Strip that Israel bombs every day and the 500 thousand residents of the West Bank.

This is nothing more than maintaining the same pattern of use of humanitarian aid associated with the particular strategic interests of each actor, who in one way or another, are involved in the conflict, as was and is done to keep the war in Ukraine or previously in Afghanistan, where 52 billion dollars were allocated annually in direct spending alone for the war for twenty years , and in 2021 UNHCR was looking for donors to raise 1.3 billion dollars and serve 42% of the Afghan population ( 13 million people, including 10 million children) who were in a food emergency at that time.

In short, when the world advocates for a definitive end to the genocide against the Palestinian people, the "international community" once again makes humanitarian aid the center of attention, when it does not reach 2% of what is granted to Israel to continue bombing Palestine, not now, for more than half a century, while the population that is confined to the Gaza Strip is told literally every day that it will continue to work hard to maintain support in this context, even if that help arrives three months later.

Image
Image 3. Distribution of financial aid in the conflict over the Palestinian territory 2023 (Photo: Food and Power).

In short, they should continue to endure the slaughter of their people, which involves bombings, restricted humanitarian access, closures of border crossings, blocking essential supplies of food, water, medicine, fuel or electricity, as long as they want to continue living in their territory. A genocide carried out with all the means on the table and no one has been able to do anything to stop it.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/el ... ontra-gaza

Google Translator

******

BRICS member South Africa takes Zionism to court

Pretoria's genocide case against Israel is crucial, not just to stop Tel Aviv's carnage in Gaza, but to plant the first flag of mutipolarism in the globe's courtrooms: this is the first case of many that will seek to halt western impunity and restore international law as envisioned in the UN Charter.


Pepe Escobar

JAN 10, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Nothing less than the full concept of international law will be on trial this week in The Hague. The whole world is watching.

It took an African nation, not an Arab or Muslim nation, but significantly a BRICS member, to try to break the iron chains deployed by Zionism via fear, financial might, and non-stop threats, enslaving not only Palestine but substantial swathes of the planet.

By a twist of historical poetic justice, South Africa, a nation that knows one or two things about apartheid, had to take the moral high ground and be the first to file a suit against apartheid Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

The 84-page lawsuit, exhaustively argued, fully documented, and filed on 29 December 2023, details all the ongoing horrors perpetrated in the occupied Gaza Strip and followed by everyone with a smartphone around the planet.

South Africa asks the ICJ – a UN mechanism – something quite straightforward: Declare that the state of Israel has breached all its responsibilities under international law since 7 October.

And that, crucially, includes a violation of the 1948 Genocide Convention, according to which genocide consists of “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”

South Africa is supported by Jordan, Bolivia, Turkiye, Malaysia, and significantly the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), which combines the lands of Islam, and constitutes 57 member states, 48 of these harboring a Muslim majority. It’s as if these nations were representing the overwhelming majority of the Global South.

Whatever happens at The Hague could go way beyond a possible condemnation of Israeli for genocide. Both Pretoria and Tel Aviv are members of the ICJ – so the rulings are binding. The ICJ, in theory, carries more weight than the UN Security Council, where the US vetoes any hard facts that tarnish Israel’s carefully constructed self-image.

The only problem is that the ICJ does not have enforcement power.

What South Africa, in practical terms, is aiming to achieve is to have the ICJ impose on Israel an order to stop the invasion – and the genocide – right away. That should be the first priority.

A specific intent to destroy

Reading the full South African application is a horrifying exercise. This is literally history in the making, right in front of us living in the young, tech-addicted, 21st century, and not a science fiction account of a genocide taking place in some distant universe.

Pretoria's application carries the merit of drawing The Big Picture, “in the broader context of Israel’s conduct towards Palestinians during its 75-year-long apartheid, its 56-year-long belligerent occupation of Palestinian territory, and its 16-year-long blockade of Gaza.”

Cause, effect, and intent are clearly delineated, transcending the horrors that have been perpetrated since the Palestinian resistance's Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October, 2023.

Then there are “acts and omissions by Israel which are capable of amounting to other violations of international law.” South Africa lists them as “genocidal in character, as they are committed with the requisite specific intent (dolus specialis) to destroy Palestinians in Gaza as a part of the broader Palestinian national, racial and ethnic group.”

'The Facts,' introduced from page 9 of the application, are brutal – ranging from the indiscriminate massacre of civilians to mass expulsion: “It is estimated that over 1.9 million Palestinians out of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million people – approximately 85 percent of the population – have been forced from their homes. There is nowhere safe for them to flee to, those who cannot leave or refuse to be displaced have been killed or are at extreme risk of being killed in their homes.”

And there will be no turning back: “As noted by the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of internally displaced persons, Gaza’s housing and civilian infrastructure have been razed to the ground, frustrating any realistic prospects for displaced Gazans to return home, repeating a long history of mass forced displacement of Palestinians by Israel.”

The complicit Hegemon

Item 142 of the application may encapsulate the whole drama: “The entire population is facing starvation: 93 percent of the population in Gaza is facing crisis levels of hunger, with more than one in four facing catastrophic condition" – with death imminent.

Against this backdrop, on 25 December – Christmas day – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu doubled down on his genocidal rhetoric, promising: ‘We are not stopping, we are continuing to fight and we are deepening the fighting in the coming days, and this will be a long battle and it is not close to being over.”

So, “as a matter of extreme urgency,” and “pending the Court’s determination of this case on the merits,” South Africa is asking for provisional measures, the first of which will be for “the state of Israel to immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza.”

This amounts to a permanent ceasefire. Every grain of sand from the Negev to Arabia knows that the neocon psychos in charge of US foreign policy, including their pet, remote-controlled, senile occupant of the White House are not only complicit in the Israeli genocide but oppose any possibility of a ceasefire.

Incidentally, such complicity is also punishable by law, according to the Genocide Convention.

Hence, it is a given that Washington and Tel Aviv will go no-holds-barred to block a fair trial by the ICJ, using every means of pressure and threat available. That dovetails with the extremely limited power exercised by any international court to impose the rule of international law on the exceptionalist Washington–Tel Aviv combo.

While an alarmed Global South is moved to action against Israel's unprecedented military assault on Gaza, where over 1 percent of the population has been murdered in less than three months, the Israeli Foreign Ministry has regimented its embassies to arm-twist host country diplomats and politicians to swiftly issue an "immediate and unequivocal statement along the following lines: To publicly and clearly state that your country rejects the outrageous, absurd, and baseless allegations made against Israel."

It will be quite enlightening to see which nations will abide by the order.

Whether Pretoria's current efforts succeed or not, this case is likely to be only the first of its kind filed in courts around the world in the months and even years ahead. The BRICS – of which South Africa is a crucial member state – are part of the new swell of international organizations challenging western hegemony and its ‘rules-based order.’ These rules mean nothing; nobody has even seen them.

In part, multipolarism has emerged to redress the decades-long shift away from the UN Charter and rush toward the lawlessness embodied in these illusory 'rules.' The nation-state system that underpins the global order cannot function without the international law that secures it. Without the law, we face war, war, and more war; the Hegemon's ideal universe of endless war, in fact.

South Africa's genocide case against Israel is blatantly necessary to reverse these flagrant violations of the international system, and will almost certainly be the first of many such litigations against both Israel and its allies to shift the world back to stability, security, and common sense.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/brics ... m-to-court

Blinken holds ‘tense’ meeting with PA President

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken is meeting with a series of leaders in West Asia to try and prevent a spillover of Israel's war on Gaza

News Desk

JAN 10, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: AFP)

The US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken met with the Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in the Israeli-occupied West Bank on 10 January, in which the two reportedly held a “tense” meeting marked by “arguments.”

Abbas reportedly told Blinken to pressure Israel to release withheld funds by Israel, saying, “If you do not have the ability to release funds, how will you have the ability to put pressure on Israel and achieve peace and a Palestinian state?”

Israel has withheld part of the funds belonging to the Palestinian Authority for years over issues such as payments to Palestinian prisoners and now the Gaza war.

Abbas also told Blinken about the importance of Gaza, saying that it is “an integral part of the Palestinian state ... it is not possible to accept or deal with the plans of the occupation authorities to separate it, or cut off any part of it.”

Blinken crossed into Ramallah to meet with Abbas after having met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his war cabinet in Tel Aviv a day prior.

He said in a news conference on Tuesday that the discussion with Abbas will be about the responsibility of the Palestinian Authority to reform itself and improve its rule.

The White House has said that it sees a role for the Palestinian Authority in governing both the West Bank and Gaza.

The last time Abbas’ Fatah party was in power in the Gaza Strip was in the early 2000s, prior to Hamas’ rule in 2007.

Blinken will fly to Bahrain for more war talks as a last-minute addition to the multi-day diplomatic tour of West Asia, and will be meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi in Cairo later in the trip.

Both Sisi and Abbas are expected to arrive in Jordan later on Wednesday for a crisis leadership summit announced by King Abdullah II as part of “Jordan's continuous efforts in coordinating Arab positions, to pressure for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, and the uninterrupted delivery of humanitarian aid.”

During Tuesday’s meeting with Netanyahu, US State Department spokesperson Matt Miller said Blinken “stressed the importance of avoiding further civilian harm and protecting civilian infrastructure in Gaza” while also re-affirming US support “for Israel’s right to prevent the terrorist attacks of [7 October] from being repeated.”

Following his meeting with Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS), Blinken said that the kingdom had shown a clear interest in pursuing normalization talks with Israel, following its war on the Palestinian people.

Blinken arrived in West Asia on 7 January for US diplomatic efforts to prevent the spread of the ongoing war between Israel and Palestinian Resistance factions.

“This is a conflict that could easily metastasize, causing even more insecurity and even more suffering,” the US diplomat said during a joint press conference with Qatar’s foreign minister. “So, from day one, among other priorities, we have been intensely focused on working to prevent the conflict from spreading. We share a commitment to ensure that the conflict does not expand.“

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/blink ... -president

Iraq wants ‘orderly’ withdrawal of ‘destabilizing’ US troops: PM

Baghdad has informed Washington of the need to start talks on establishing a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops

News Desk

JAN 10, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani said on 10 January that Baghdad wants “a quick and orderly” withdrawal of US combat forces from Iraq.

Baghdad has not yet set a deadline, the prime minister said, but affirmed that the presence of US troops is “destabilizing.”

"There is a need to re-organize [our] relationship [with Washington] so that it is not a target or justification for any party, internal or foreign, to tamper with stability in Iraq and the region," Sudani said, partly in reference to attacks by the Iraqi resistance on US bases.

The Iraqi prime minister has repeatedly said that Baghdad will neither accept foreign troops nor armed factions operating on its soil. Many of these resistance groups are represented within Sudani’s government in the political coalition of Shia factions known as the Coordination Framework (CF).

On 8 January, the CF held a meeting to discuss “support for the Iraqi government's efforts to end the mission of the US-led coalition in Iraq."

The spokesperson for the Iraqi prime minister, Dhia al-Nasiri, said on 9 January that Baghdad informed Washington of the need to begin negotiations to secure a withdrawal of US forces from the country.

The Iraqi government “informed the American side of the necessity of starting negotiations on a timetable for the withdrawal of international coalition forces from the country,” Nasiri told Arab World Press (AWP).

“A timetable is currently being formulated to reduce the number of coalition forces and foreign military advisors working in Iraq,” Nasiri added. “A higher military committee is scheduled to begin re-evaluating the country’s military and security situation, evaluating the capabilities of the Iraqi forces, and examining plans to enhance these capabilities.”

The ability of the security forces to confront what remains of the ISIS threat in Iraq will also be assessed, the spokesperson said. “These internal assessments will determine the course of negotiation regarding the withdrawal schedule of the international coalition forces, its details, the number and quality of forces, advisors, and the method of their withdrawal.”

Nasiri confirmed that the Iraqi government maintains coordination with Washington and the US army. However, he emphasized Iraq’s adherence to Sudani’s previous assertions that the country does not need foreign combat forces.

The comments by spokesperson Nasiri came a day after Iraqi President Abdel Latif Rashid told the country’s US ambassador, Alena Romanowski, that the US presence in Iraq must be limited to an advisory role.

On 5 January, Sudani said that the Iraq–US bilateral committee, established late last year, had started the process of scheduling the withdrawal of US forces from the country.

Just days later, Washington said that it does not intend to exit the country, and that it was unaware of any plans to do so.

The Iraqi resistance has been attacking US bases in Iraq and Syria on a near-daily basis since October. The attacks come in solidarity with the Palestinian resistance and also aim to hasten the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq.

Washington has responded to these attacks with several violent air strikes on Iraq and its capital, violating the country’s sovereignty. Baghdad has condemned these strikes while also condemning resistance attacks on US bases.

In 2020, following the assassination of Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani, the Iraqi parliament voted in favor of expelling US troops from Iraq. The resolution specifically called for the cancellation of Iraq’s formal request for US military assistance against ISIS, which was issued in 2014.

Washington rejected the resolution and threatened to impose heavy sanctions on Baghdad.

"We have a very extraordinarily expensive air base that’s there. It cost billions of dollars to build ... We’re not leaving unless they pay us back for it … We will charge them sanctions like they’ve never seen before ever. It’ll make Iranian sanctions look somewhat tame," said then-US president Donald Trump on the same day as the Iraqi parliamentary vote.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/iraq- ... -troops-pm

Syrian Arab tribes reject US effort to co-opt anti-SDF revolt

Arab tribes in Deir Ezzor began a revolt against the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces in August and have attacked US forces in response to Israel's war on Gaza

News Desk

JAN 10, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Middle East Insititute).

Arab Tribes fighting a revolt against the US-backed and Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) occupying northeast Syria have rejected US attempts to co-opt their movement using tribal figures now living in the US, Al-Mayadeen reported on 10 January.

Mahmoud al-Musalat and Aboud Jadaan al-Hafel, who had emigrated to the US, returned to Syria last month to hold meetings with the Arab tribes in the Deir Ezzor governorate. On behalf of the US government, Musalat and Hafel sought to convince the tribes to end their revolt against the SDF and support the US project in the region, sources speaking with Al-Maydeen said.

Aboud Jadaan al-Hafel is the uncle of the sheik of the Al-Aqidat tribe, Ibrahim al-Hafel, who leads the military and popular movement against the SDF in Deir Ezzor.

The Arab revolt against Kurdish rule in the form of the SDF began in August. Ibrahim al-Hafel quickly organized the resistance with support from the Syrian government. Tribal forces sought to expel SDF forces from Deir Ezzor and force them to return to the Kurdish-majority governorate of Hasakah.

But Aboud’s efforts to create a rapprochement between the Arab tribes and the SDF after returning from the US were unsuccessful, tribal sources confirmed to Al-Mayadeen.

The sources added that “the tribesmen did not show any enthusiasm for the ideas held by [Aboud] al-Hafel regarding the issue of partnering with the SDF in managing the region and granting a role to the tribesmen in managing their areas,” noting that “the majority of the clans’ and tribes’ notables confirmed their lack of confidence in the United States of America and its biased role toward parties that It supports it in Syria,” referring to the SDF.

The sources pointed out that “the people of the Al-Aqidat tribe only recognize the office of the sons of Khalil Aboud Al-Hafel as their sheikhdom, and they show loyalty to them in all their orientations in the region,” expecting that “these people brought from the United States will return to the areas from which they came without achieving any of their goals.”

Ibrahim al-Hafel and his tribal fighters claimed responsibility for a missile attack on the US-controlled Conoco base in Deir Ezzor in October as part of the broader resistance to US occupation of Syria by Iraqi armed groups known as the Islamic Resistance in Iraq.

Attacks by the Islamic Resistance in Iraq against US forces occupying Syria and Iraq have accelerated since 7 October when war erupted between Israel and Hamas.

Along with other groups forming the Axis of Resistance, such as Hezbollah and Ansarallah, the Islamic Resistance in Iraq has sought to target the US and Israel to help counter Israel’s war on Gaza, which is widely viewed as constituting Genocide.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/syria ... sdf-revolt
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Jan 12, 2024 12:57 pm

U.S. (Re-) Starts War With Houthi

The Houthi movement is a major part of the Ansar Islam government of Yemen.

Over eight years of war the Houthi have fought the U.S. supported Saudis and UAE mercenaries to a standstill.

Their slogan:

Image

God is the Greatest
Death to America
Death to Israel
A Curse Upon the Jews
Victory to Islam


In solidarity with Gaza the Houthi have recently blocked sea bound traffic to the U.S. supported Israel.

Richard Medhurst @richimedhurst - 2:32 UTC · Jan 12, 2024
Yemen fulfilled their duty under Art. 1 of the Genocide Convention to prevent and punish Israel for its genocide.
If you don't like Yemen firing at commercial ships, then you shouldn't fire 2000lb bombs at Palestinians.
All non-Israeli ships can pass np
It's very simple.


After its failed attempt to form a anti-Houthi coalition under the stupid name Operation Prosperity Garden the U.S. asked its sidekick Britain to support an attack on the Houthi.

Houthi leader Sayed Abdel Malik Al Houthi promised publicly (vid) to responds to any U.S./UK attack.

The Houthi prepared by diverting its equipment and personnel.

Faytuks News Δ @Faytuks - 8:32 PM · Jan 11, 2024
Breaking: Houthi forces have transported some weapons and equipment and fortified others in anticipation of a strike by the U.S. and its allies, a U.S. defense official and a person close to the Houthis says - WSJ

Maritime executives have been told by Western diplomats that targets would likely include missile and drone launch sites, radars and weapons depots around the Yemeni cities of Hodeida and Hajjah. Infrastructure in the capital San’a is also on the list of possible targets - WSJ

The Middle East is braced on Thursday for U.S.-led coalition strikes on Houthi positions


The U.S (and UK) attacked anyway:

US, UK carry out strikes against Yemen's Houthis following Red Sea attacks- AL-Monitor

The United States and the United Kingdom carried out precision strikes on a dozen military sites used by the Houthis in Yemen on Thursday night in response to the group's continued attacks on commercial cargo ships and tankers in the Red Sea since the outbreak of the Gaza war.
US and UK combat aircraft, joined by US warships and at least one submarine fired more than 100 precision-guided munitions, including Tomahawk cruise missiles, starting around 2:30 a.m. local time Friday, suppressing air defenses by targeting radar systems, two US defense officials told Al-Monitor.

More than 60 targets, including facilities used by the Houthis to store and launch drones, cruise and ballistic missiles, were struck at 16 different locations, US Central Command said following the attacks.

The targets were chosen specifically in order to disrupt the Houthis' ability to continue to their attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea while minimizing risk to civilians, defense officials said.


After its failures during twenty years of War Of Terror one wonders how many weddings the U.S. strike in Yemen has hit.

The Houthi will, of course, retaliate.

If I were a sailor on a U.S. Navy ship in the Red Sea or Persian Gulf I would now put on a rescue vest and sleep on the deck.

Posted by b on January 12, 2024 at 7:12 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/01/u ... .html#more

******

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 11
January 11, 2024
Rybar

Image

In the north of the Gaza Strip, Israeli troops continue to clear urban areas while simultaneously destroying Hamas underground tunnels. The activity of Palestinian forces is limited to only occasional incursions and ambushes.

In the area of ​​the isthmus between the northern and southern parts of the enclave, the main fighting takes place in the area of ​​the Al - Breij camp . Also, the Israeli Air Force continues to carry out massive bombings of Nuseirat , Al - Maghazi and Deir al - Balah .

In the south of the enclave, IDF units continue to concentrate forces near the building of the Islamic University in Khan Yunis , while Palestinian forces are trying to dislodge them from there or at least delay them.

A notable incident occurred in the Gulf of Oman, where IRGC special forces seized the St Nikolas , which was previously owned by Iran . In fact, the Iranians were responsible for last year’s incident, and one should not expect a new round of conflict because of this - this is just another episode of the “tanker war” between Iran and the United States .

Meanwhile, the first hearing was held in The Hague in the case of recognizing the war in the Gaza Strip as genocide based on a claim previously filed by South Africa . The Israeli side was presented with a wide range of accusations, which it will be able to answer tomorrow during the second day of hearings.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

Image
Israeli troops continue to methodically carry out cleansing operations in the controlled territory of the enclave. As in previous days, soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces are carrying out explosions of high-rise buildings, while at the same time work is underway to destroy underground communications of Palestinian formations. Fighting with Hamas has been sporadic and largely limited to ambushes and occasional mortar fire. Thus, Palestinian forces reported an attack on an Israeli tank in Jabaliya , as well as the capture of one of the IDF drones.


Against the background of the withdrawal of several units of the Israel Defense Forces from the northern part of the Gaza Strip, footage of the consequences of the actions of Israeli troops, including in the Shajaya area ( Al - Judaida ), is increasingly appearing on the Internet. Large-scale destruction is associated not only with massive bombings, but also with the so-called. “terraforming the area” - the destruction of all high-rise buildings where exits from Hamas underground tunnels could be located.

For several months, Israeli troops have been pursuing a scorched earth tactic. In the same Al-Judaida last month, 56 houses were blown up at one time . Nevertheless, the IDF command does not ask questions about the ethics of using such tactics - for the Israelis, saving the lives of their fighters is much more valuable than dozens of destroyed buildings or casualties among the civilian population of the enclave.

Center of the Gaza Strip

Image
In the area of ​​the isthmus between the northern and southern parts of the enclave, Israeli troops are still trying to close the encirclement around the Al-Breij camp . Despite statements from some media about the settlement falling into a “ cauldron , ” no footage was published that could confirm this. In parallel with ground attacks, massive shelling of Palestinian-controlled settlements continues: Nuseirat , Al - Maghazi and Deir al - Balah came under fire .

Judging by the emerging configuration of the front, at the current stage, Israeli troops intend to accomplish two goals: first, to clear Al-Breij and Nuseirat ; secondly, advance along the Salah ad-Din highway to controlled territories in the south of the enclave. And at the next stage, the Israelis will be able to begin the assault on Deir al - Balakh , the largest populated area in this area.

South Gaza Strip

Image
IDF units continue to advance towards the southeastern and southwestern outskirts of Khan Yunis . Due to the rains, it is not possible to establish the exact zone of Israeli control from satellite images. And the footage appearing on the Internet also does not provide an opportunity to shed light on the configuration of the front. Judging by text messages, the situation has not changed since yesterday: Israeli troops are still concentrating forces near the building of the Islamic University , while Palestinian forces are trying to drive them out or at least detain them. Meanwhile, not far from the city hall, the Israelis continue to carry out clean-up operations, actively using engineering equipment, including bulldozers, the destruction of which Hamas militants regularly report.


Simultaneously with the fighting on the ground, Israeli fighters are destroying the discovered Hamas tunnels. The Israeli command reported on the clearing of one of them last day: according to them, there were Israeli hostages there. However, earlier the IDF almost immediately reinforced such words with footage of those released - this time there was only one video of the tunnel itself, and even that was cut off. According to the latest information, since the start of the ground operation, Israeli troops have destroyed and disabled more than 100 Hamas underground routes.

Border with Lebanon

Image
The intensity of strikes on Israel's northern border has increased slightly compared to yesterday. Hezbollah fighters launched rockets at Israeli military facilities and the settlements of Adamit , Dovev , Al - Baghdadi , Al - Malikiya , Metula and Ramtha .


Kiryat Shmona was under massive fire : the Lebanese group reported launching 30 missiles, and the Israelis reported intercepting three and hitting the city with seven missiles. In the populated area, residential buildings and road surfaces were damaged. After a series of attacks from Lebanon, electricity was lost in Kiryat Shmona, as well as neighboring Margaliota , Manare and Misgav Ame .


In turn, Israeli troops launched artillery and air strikes throughout the south of Lebanon : Yarin , Aita al - Shaab , Markaba and Khiam were also under fire . An Israeli missile hit a medical center in Hanin caused significant resonance : nearby buildings were damaged, two employees of the medical facility were killed, and two more people were injured. Hezbollah accused the Israelis of another act of aggression and promised to retaliate.

West Bank

Image
Israeli security forces continue to conduct police operations in various localities in the region. The most violent clashes again took place in Jenin , where law enforcement officers engaged in battle with local terrorist cells.


The militants staged several ambushes on IDF fighters in the populated area, including using improvised explosive devices. And in neighboring Jaba, a shootout ended with several civilians wounded.


At the same time, footage of the transfer of additional units to the populated area from Dothan was published on the Internet. Another clash occurred at the Salem checkpoint , where small arms fire was opened on border guards. In other populated areas, raids by Israeli security forces took place quite routinely.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

Last night, pro-Iranian groups attacked the American military base " Hemo " west of Qamishli airport in northeastern Syria : according to eyewitnesses, two explosions were heard near the facility, followed by the takeoff of American helicopters. And this afternoon the US military base Ash - Shaddadi came under fire . And rockets were launched from Syria towards the Golan Heights : the ammunition fell in open areas and did not cause damage.

Image
Another interesting turn of events occurred in the Gulf of Oman , where the special forces of the Iranian naval forces of the IRGC boarded the ship St Nikolas . A group landed from the helicopter, took control of the tanker, and is now accompanying it to Bandar - Abbas . It seems that recent trends suggest that there is nothing unusual in this incident. Against the backdrop of regular attempts by the Houthis to seize commercial ships in the Red Sea, the actions of the Iranians no longer seem supernatural.

But the devil is in the details: this ship was originally Iranian and bore the name Suez Rajan . More precisely, it belonged to a Greek company, but was chartered by the Iranians. However, then the Greeks made a deal with the Americans and transferred it to the United States. After a lengthy trial in the United States, the Americans took the oil from it, and the tanker was seized and began to be used for their own purposes. And now, after more than six months, the Iranians actually returned what they had, and even with resources on board.

Where it leads? Actually, there's no point. The so-called “tanker war” between Iran and the United States has been going on for several years. This is just another episode of this confrontation, where the Iranians are avoiding sanctions through shadow trade, and the White House is obstructing them. At the same time, against the backdrop of the already mentioned Houthi attacks on shipping in the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea, an IRGC attack in the Gulf of Oman will force the Western naval group to react and, probably, withdraw some of its forces to the Iranian shores. And this certainly plays into the hands of the Houthis.

About Idan Amedi and more

At the beginning of the week, the wounding of the famous Israeli singer and actor Idan Amedi in the area of ​​the Al - Breij camp in the central part of the Gaza Strip was actively discussed on the Internet . Before the conflict began to escalate, Amedi was known as the performer of the role of an elite IDF fighter in the TV series “ Fauda ,” but in October he became personally acquainted with real combat operations, becoming a reservist.


In this whole story, the circumstances of the actor’s injury are noteworthy: during preparatory work to blow up one of the tunnels, a unit of engineering troops was attacked by Hamas militants. During the ensuing battle, an IDF tank opened fire on the Palestinians, but immediately after the shot there was a powerful explosion. According to some reports, a tank shell hit a truck with explosives while the Israeli engineers had not yet left the danger zone. As a result: six reservists were killed, several more people were injured, including Amedi himself.

At the beginning of the year, the IDF announced that about 17% of all Israeli deaths in the Gaza Strip were accidents: from errors in working with explosive devices to friendly fire. However, given the insignificant losses of Israeli troops after the start of the ground operation, even 17% is not that much - around 30 people. At the beginning of the year, the IDF announced that about 17% of all Israeli deaths in the Gaza Strip were accidents: from errors in working with explosive devices to friendly fire. However, given the insignificant losses of Israeli troops after the start of the ground operation, even 17% is not that much - around 30 people.

Well, in general, the Israelis can be envied in a good way in the case of actors being called up for military service. In Russia, a significant part of creative people simply remained silent, and some, following Pashinin’s example, completely abandoned Russian viewers and went into the trenches with Ukrainian formations. A natural question arises: when will all these brethren become disillusioned, continuing to wage such a war for the sake of war, which is so beneficial to the ultra-Orthodox?

Political-diplomatic background
About the UN International Court of Israel


Today the International Court of Justice in The Hague considered South Africa's claim against Israel. Thus, the Israeli side was accused of violating the Genocide Convention in the Gaza Strip . Representatives of the delegation noted that the IDF's actions go beyond self-defense and only lead to the death of civilians, while the Israeli authorities continue to justify their bombings as an attack by Hamas militants on October 7. And one of the representatives of the South African delegation, Visumuzi Madonsela, generally compared the attitude of the Israelis towards the Palestinians with the apartheid regime: “ Israel has been systematically displacing and dividing the Palestinian people since 1948, deliberately denying them the internationally established right to self-determination. We are also particularly concerned about Israel's institutional regime of discriminatory law, a policy that aims to apartheid the Palestinian people ."


Earlier, the Israeli Foreign Ministry called the South African lawsuit “ one of the greatest manifestations of hypocrisy in history ,” emphasizing that the accusations are absurd and unsubstantiated. The Israelis will be able to argue their position tomorrow, on the second day of the hearings, when the Israeli delegation will be given the floor.


At the same time, throughout the day, a series of demonstrations in support of the Gaza Strip took place outside the court in The Hague. The protesters called on Israeli troops to stop fighting in the enclave and sit down at the negotiating table.


Meanwhile, Israeli supporters also marched, blaming Hamas for the events and calling for the release of the hostages.

On the threat of British strikes on Yemen

Image

The British The Times , citing the British Ministry of Defense , reports that the Royal Forces are already on the verge of attacks on Yemeni territory after a massive Ansarallah attack on a group of coalition ships.

You know, when articles of this kind come out almost every day, it becomes increasingly difficult to take them seriously. “Just a little more, one more attack, and we will definitely think about a severe response,” this is how one can describe the actions of the collective West.

But all this was expected. Tensions in the Red Sea and the activity of the Houthis are beneficial in terms of pressure on the ultra-Orthodox in Israel. Demonstrative strikes against Yemen are likely to occur soon if the current level of escalation continues. But you shouldn’t expect a devastating result from them. The Houthis have become accustomed to such attacks over years of war. The coalition will strike, and Ansarallah will attack in response. Both will save face, and everyone will remain their own.

Image
Considering all of the above, the range of weapons on the Houthis’ balance sheet is truly impressive . In addition to long-range drones and missiles, which Ansarallah fighters once fired at both Saudi Arabia and the UAE , Sanaa did not forget about anti-ship weapons. Now the Houthis use cruise anti-ship missiles and even ballistic ones. It was the Ansarallah units that were actually the first to prove in practice the effectiveness of this type of missile for hitting moving surface targets.

Range varies depending on the type, but some can attack targets up to 800 km away, allowing control of ships throughout the Gulf of Aden and the southern Red Sea. And their number could be quite significant, given that the Iranians have been regularly supplying the Houthis with everything they need for many years. So Ansarallah is able to conduct military operations in the same vein for a long time.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

*********

Israelis impersonate Lebanese security to ‘obtain info’ on Hezbollah

After the recent targeted assassination of Hezbollah members, concerns have risen over the presence of Israeli spies on the ground

News Desk

JAN 11, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: EPA)

Hezbollah released a statement on the evening of 10 January, warning the villagers of south Lebanon that Israel – using individuals disguised as Lebanese security forces – has been contacting families and townspeople in order to obtain information on the whereabouts of the resistance group’s fighters and members.

“The enemy is looking for alternative ways to collect information about the resistance and the whereabouts of its fighters in the villages of the south, especially after losing large parts of its eavesdropping and spy devices installed on the border, which have been targeted and destroyed by the resistance,” Hezbollah announced on Wednesday night via its media channel.

“The enemy resorts to contacting some of our esteemed families from phone numbers that appear to be Lebanese, via both fixed and cellular networks, with the aim of inquiring about some individuals, their whereabouts, and the location of their homes.”

According to the statement, those who have been calling on behalf of Israel are “impersonating” or pretending to be individuals associated with Lebanese security forces.

“The enemy impersonates multiple characters claiming to be affiliated with the Internal Security Forces in the southern regions … At other times, they also pose as members of relief agencies providing aid.”

“The callers speak with a Lebanese accent, seeking information about family members and the whereabouts of our members … under the guise of showing concern and seeking to provide assistance. The enemy exploits this information to verify the presence of the Mujahideen in some of the homes it intends to target,” the statement added.

Hezbollah went on to warn the people of southern Lebanon to exercise caution and to report any suspicious calls to the authorities.

Fighting has intensified on the southern Lebanese border after an Israeli drone strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs early this month. Hezbollah responded to the attack with a large rocket strike on Tel Aviv’s strategic Meron air base.

Wissam al-Tawil, the deputy head of a unit within Hezbollah's elite Radwan force, was assassinated in an Israeli drone strike on his vehicle on 8 January. The Lebanese resistance retaliated with a drone attack on a northern Israeli command center.

Three other fighters were killed in another airstrike on their car the following day, on 9 January.

The killings were targeted, and took place deeper into Lebanese territory than usual, raising concerns over the presence of Israeli spies on the ground.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/israe ... -hezbollah

‘Terrifying’ number of injuries since start of Gaza war: Israeli media

According to the Israeli defense ministry, over 6,000 members of the security forces have been wounded over the past three months

News Desk

JAN 11, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Noam Revkin Fenton/Flash90)

Over 6,000 members of the Israeli security establishment – including the army and the police – have been injured since the start of the war between Israel and the resistance in Gaza and Lebanon, the Jerusalem Post reported on 11 January, citing defense ministry figures.

“The numbers coming out are terrifying,” the Israeli outlet wrote. Out of the 6,000 who have been wounded, more than 2,000 are permanently disabled, the report highlights.

“Nothing prepared the medical establishment for the onslaught of injuries resulting from the war over the last three months.”

According to the Jerusalem Post, Israel’s Health Ministry warned the Knesset, only a month into the war, that Tel Aviv was not prepared to handle the massive number of injuries.

The Defense Ministry has said it works at “full capacity” to assist many wounded. Israel’s health sector is facing “chronic shortages,” which continue to worsen, according to the Taub Center for Social Policy Studies.

“I have never seen a scope like this and an intensity like this,” Edan Kleiman, head of the Israeli NGO Disabled Veterans Organization, said recently.

Kleiman added that the number will jump to 20,000 once those with PTSD are included in the toll.

Three months since the start of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, the Israeli army continues to face fierce resistance from Hamas’ Qassam Brigades and other groups in Gaza, falling into daily ambushes.

The Qassam Brigades said on Monday that they killed multiple Israeli soldiers in central Gaza’s Bureij Camp that day, indicating that they were killed while attempting to free a captive held by Hamas. The army claimed the deaths resulted from an accidental explosion aimed at destroying an underground Hamas facility.

Tel Aviv claims that the number of dead soldiers since the ground war was expanded on 27 October stands at 186. However, the number is expected to be much higher – as Israel is known to hide its losses through strict censorship laws imposed on what is reported in the media.

Hebrew media reported last month that the official number of wounded soldiers provided by Tel Aviv is only half of the actual toll, according to hospital records.

The Israeli military is also facing heavy losses on the border with Lebanon, where Hezbollah has been striking bases, outposts, and gatherings of troops daily since 8 October.

“Our operations have been very exhausting for the enemy, which has exercised extreme secrecy about its heavy losses,” said Lebanese resistance leader Hassan Nasrallah in his most recent speech.

"The Israeli enemy does not acknowledge either the dead or the wounded, and this is part of its policy of general secrecy about its losses … The army's losses are three times more than the announced numbers," Nasrallah added.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/terri ... aeli-media

*******

“Israel Capitulates at the Start of International Court of Justice Genocide Hearing”
Posted on January 11, 2024 by Yves Smith

Yes, it would have been nice if the headline act had happened. I’ve been watching the International Court of Justice hearings on South Africa’s genocide charges against South Africa. As expected South Africa is laying out a compressed version of the devastating case it made in its filing.

One interesting wrinkle is at the top of the hearing, the registrar read into the record a new element submitted by South Africa, not contained in its 84 page case, that of a detailed list of the “provisional measures” that is it asking the court to impose on Israel. Recall that the form of this filing was an “Indication of Provisional Measures,” that is, that the evidence of genocide was so overwhelming that the Court should impose provisional measures with the intent of halting Israel’s genocidal conduct while the case continued on the normal (time consuming) course. This list is comprehensive and well thought out, ranging from a cessation of formal military and irregular forces action against Palestinian, ending conduct designed to cause physical and psychological harm and prevent births, to stop forced displacement, to provide access to food, medical care, fuel and other necessities of life to preserving evidence with respect to genocide and not restrict access to fact-finder regarding this type of evidence. This is an approximate recap; I will append a transcript of this section when one becomes available.

Israel does not have any good cards to play, not just with respect to the South Africa genocide case but in its campaign against Palestinians. It seems to be relying on the fact that no one has been able to stop the slow-motion extermination of Palestinians, and that all it needs to do is stay its vicious course of action. But that sort of win is not going to make Israel safer.


Israel is running into the considerable limits on its and US power, and the resulting costs. Israel looks unable to achieve its stated aim of destroying Hamas. Israel has pulled ground forces out of Gaza, in effect confirming that clearing Gaza of Hamas fighters is not its aim. As we have regularly pointed out, the lack of food shipments, limited water supplies. destruction of hospitals, and the flattening of shelter means everyone in Gaza will die in not that long a time in the absence of an intervention. But the Houthi blockade of shipping to and from Israel is damaging not just the Israeli economy (see reports of imminent food shortages) but global shipping, witness the hissy fit by the US and 11 other countries trying to intimidate the Houthis into backing down. But the Western threats are pure noise-making. It’s not realistic for a Western coalition of the willing to subdue Yemen, particularly with its stockpile of weapons to deploy against any landing parties. And if they could subdue the Houthis otherwise, they would already have done so.

Israel similarly has only lose-lose choices as far as Hezbollah in concerned. Their pattern of tit for tat attacks picked up in severity and a bit in range, leading to evacuation of border towns. Israel has committed to getting Hezbollah to pull back from the border…with no agreement from Hezbollah to do so and doubtful means to make that happen by force. Most experts believe that the Israeli army is so poorly prepared that were it to push into Lebanon, Hezbollah could and likely would occupy northern Israel, potentially as far as Galilee. Perhaps Israel hopes to pull the US in more deeply, but it’s not as if it would do any better with US help (Scott Ritter has stressed that war game have consistently shown the reverse).

Israel media and statements by official show the country is still operating on blood lust and not realism. The country’s statements so far suggest that rather than attempting a dignified response to the serious South Africa charges, Israel, in keeping with its refusal to file a written answer, looks primed instead in the hearing tomorrow to attack the legitimacy of the court and the charges. That would only serve to further isolate Israel, even if it plays well on domestic TV. Or perhaps is has made a nose count and has come to the same conclusion as Norman Finkelstein, that it will prevail because Russia and China will not vote for the South Africa charge due to their own exposure to similar filings (there is already a case against Russian lodged with the ICJ). In keeping, CommonDreams posted a new piece on Israel’s continued insistence that it is perfectly within its rights to eradicate Palestinians. From the piece:

Two Israeli lawmakers from right-wing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party doubled down Wednesday on calls to destroy or depopulate Gaza, prompting an admonition from the country’s attorney general on the eve of an emergency hearing in the South African-led genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.

In an interview with Hakol Baramah radio, Deputy Knesset Speaker Nissim Vaturi said he did not regret his November call for Israel to “stop being humane” and “burn Gaza now.”

“I stand behind my words,” Vaturi said, according toThe Times of Israel. “It is better to burn down buildings rather than have soldiers harmed. There are no innocents there.”…

Meanwhile, Haaretz reported that Danny Danon, a former United Nations ambassador now serving in the Knesset, said in a Wednesday radio interview that Israel must “not do half a job” in Gaza.

That, Danon said, means “voluntary migration” of Palestinians from Gaza—a euphemism, critics say, for an ethnic cleansing campaign akin to the Nakba, or “catastrophe,” in which more than 750,000 Arabs were forcibly expelled from Palestine during the war to establish the modern state of Israel in 1948.

In November, Danon co-authored a Wall Street Journal opinion piece suggesting the ethnic cleansing of some of Gaza’s population to Western countries that would accept the refugees.


Admittedly, only one of the two of the officials is calling explicitly for genocide, although as we have observed, ethnic cleansing when so far no country is willing to enable the Israel scheme means its continuing program to make Gaza uninhabitable amounts to the same thing.

Israel is presumably running a “How many divisions does the ICJ have?” calculus. The ICJ is toothless and the UN, which would be the venue for action, compromised. From a new article by CAGE:

The ICJ is unlikely to make a decision on whether Israel is carrying out genocide for several years. This week’s hearing is only to determine whether it should make an interim order for Israel to halt its offensive and withdraw from Gaza. Even if it were to do so, the ICJ has no effective means of implementing the order save by way of a resolution from the UN Security Council. The US has vetoed Security Council resolutions critical of Israel no less than 89 times and is unlikely to veer away from its function as Israel’s political shield. Like Russia in relation to the ICJ ruling on its invasion of Ukraine, the US has itself refused to comply with ICJ judgments against it in cases brought by Nicaragua (1986) and Iran (2018).

In recent decades, we have witnessed the demise of the so called “rules based international order“ because the UN Security Council has failed to effectively intervene to prevent acts of genocide and war crimes in Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and against the Uyghurs in China. On the contrary, the Security Council itself voted to impose genocidal sanctions on Iraq causing the deaths of approximately half a million children, a price deemed ‘worth paying’ by then US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. More recently, international institutions have failed to hold senior political figures such as Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, and George Bush, the architects of these invasions, accountable, raising serious questions about their credibility. Too often they serve to uphold Western domination rather than to deliver justice.


Again in theory, a preliminary ruling by the ICJ against Israel could pave the way for criminal cases in the International Criminal Court. It is over my pay grade as to who would have the standing to file them (correction: refer cases, the ICC is a criminal court and so does not take up filings by independent parties). But as we have seen with the ruling against Putin, key countries, including the US, do not recognize the authority of the ICC. So the effect even of (seemingly unlikely) ICC rulings against key Israeli leaders would be to limit there travel.

Could a ruling for South Africa give new grounds for reversing anti-BDS laws in the US? For challenging the very aggressive campaigns against shows of support for Palestinians in the US? It may be the biggest practical effect of a ruling for South Africa would be to further undermine Israel’s legitimacy in the US. But how many Palestinian lives would that save?

Update, 11:10 AM: I missed an additional example of Israel officials defying the ICJ to Do Something about their genocide operation. This one is arguably important since it’s a member of the government, and not a legislator:

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01 ... aring.html

******

From Libya to Paraguay: Israel’s Longstanding Goal of Expelling Palestinians from Gaza Inches Closer to Reality
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JANUARY 10, 2024
Jessica Buxbaum

Image

Once considered a fringe pipe dream, the once taboo idea of Israelis recolonizing portions of Gaza has been reinvigorated after Hamas’ October 7 attack and the subsequent Israeli war on the embattled Palestinian territory, which has killed more than 22,000 Palestinians, internally displaced more than 1.9 million, and reduced the majority of the Strip into rubble.

Just as 2024 began, Israeli politicians renewed calls to recolonize Gaza, and recent remarks from Israeli lawmakers coupled with a new settler-colonist campaign suggest that Israeli annexation of the beleaguered Palestinian territory has been adopted as official government policy.

On January 1, 2024, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir told the press and members of his Jewish Power Party that the war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” proclaiming,

We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,”

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich echoed Ben Gvir’s remarks during his party’s faction meeting, touting,

[the] correct solution [is]… to encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees.”

Talking to members of his Religious Zionism Party, Smotrich predicted that “Israel will permanently control the territory of the Gaza Strip,” as well as reestablish settlements there. A few days before, in an interview with Israel’s Channel 12, Smotrich said,

We will rule there [Gaza] security-wise, and in order to rule there security-wise for a long time, we will have to be a civilian there.”

In a separate incident on Monday, Yisrael Beytenu (“Israel is our home”) party leader Avigdor Liberman advocated for Israel to reoccupy southern Lebanon. Israel occupied part of southern Lebanon from 1982 to 2000.

Liberman maintained that Israel would not annex or build settlements in Lebanon but stressed:

[e]verything between the Litani [River] and Israel must be under the control of the IDF [Israeli military].”

“If Lebanon won’t pay in territory, we haven’t done anything,” Liberman said.

And just before the new year, on December 27, 2023, Tzivka Foghel, a member of Ben-Gvir’s Jewish Power Party, told Israeli Kan radio that Hamas “will pay the price, that we will control the area and bring Jewish settlements.” Foghel clarified he doesn’t just want to re-establish the settlements Israel withdrew from in 2005 but rather take over the entire northern section of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli lawmakers’ inflammatory rhetoric mirrors parts of Israeli society pushing for Israeli settler-colonists to return to the Gaza Strip and even colonize Lebanon. The December 1 issue of Israeli religious youth magazine, “Small World,” outlined five new Israeli settlements south of the Litani River in what would become occupied Lebanon as part of their proposal for the war’s day-after plan.

In this weekend’s #Israeli religious youth magazine (‘Small World’) a plan for five new Israeli settlements including Tyre – in what would be occupied #Lebanon (south of the Litani River) – is presented under the title “first draft for the day-after plan.” Insane. pic.twitter.com/jJycHp2BfR

— Itay Epshtain (@EpshtainItay) December 1, 2023


In line with the politicians’ comments, the Israeli government recently allocated 4.3 million shekels ($1.2 million) in November to “document” Israeli settlements in Gaza, which were withdrawn in 2005. The project is to be handled by Israel’s Minister of Heritage, Amihai Eliyahu, who made headlines in recent months after calling for dropping nuclear bombs on Gaza.

Perhaps very little in the grand scheme of things, but overnight 600K ILS were allotted to reinforce (occupied) East Jerusalem as “national tourism capital”, and 4.3 million ILS to “documenting” Israeli settlements in #Gaza (withdrawn in 2005). The latter will be implemented by… pic.twitter.com/QPw5wKAmUr

— Itay Epshtain (@EpshtainItay) November 28, 2023


ISRAEL’S CAMPAIGN TO RESETTLE GAZA

During a meeting of hundreds of Israelis in the city of Ashdod in November, Yossi Dagan, head of the Samaria Regional Council, the government body overseeing settlements in the Israeli-occupied northern West Bank, encouraged participants to reach out to their government representatives in support of recolonizing Gaza. Dagan told the crowd,

I call from here to all the ministers of the government and to their head, the prime minister — make your voices heard now, lift up your heads. Let it be known that you support the appeal to renew Jewish settlement throughout all of the Gaza Strip. The nation is waiting for you.”

Dagan is currently leading the Returning Home movement, a coalition of 11 organizations made up of thousands seeking to annul the core part of the 2005 Disengagement Law prohibiting an Israeli civilian presence in Gaza. The initiative has already received government support. Israeli parliamentary members from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party submitted a bill to amend the Disengagement Law to grant Israelis freedom of movement in Gaza after the war. Likud members of parliament (or Knesset) Ariel Kellner and Tally Gotliv spoke at the Returning Home inaugural event, along with Jewish Power Party MK Limor Son Har-Melech.

The “correct solution” to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “to encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees,”“Israel will permanently control the territory of the Gaza Strip,” https://t.co/bJG9jFN0df pic.twitter.com/YxpwdAL5vO

— Abdullah Abu Shawesh (@AM_Shawesh) January 6, 2024


In March 2023, the Israeli parliament annulled part of the law forbidding Israeli settlement in the northern West Bank after Dagan lobbied for the legislative change. Dagan was evacuated from one of the four settlements in the northern West Bank in 2005. He did not respond to MintPress News requests for an interview.

A LONGSTANDING AGENDA

Israel occupied the Gaza Strip in 1967 during the Six-Day War and re-established the first settlement in 1970. In 2005, Israel evacuated around 9,000 Israeli settler-colonists from Gaza. Despite Israel dismantling the bloc of 17 settlements known as Gush Katif, human rights experts say the Gaza Strip remains occupied to this day.

“The test under international law as to whether or not a territory is being occupied and by whom is effective control,” Michael Lynk, who served as the United Nations special rapporteur on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories from 2016 to 2022, told MintPress News.

“Hamas was ruling Gaza internally, but because Israel had this comprehensive air, sea, and land blockade over Gaza and controlled who and what got into Gaza and who and what left Gaza, it is the occupying power,” Lynk added.

Settler-colonist calls to return to Gaza began as soon as disengagement occurred, with government notions of reestablishing settlements in the Strip quietly materializing behind the scenes.

In 2018, reports revealed the Israeli military was shifting its offensive operations in Gaza from bombardment to carrying out missions that “will enter Gaza and dissect it in two, and even occupy significant parts of it.”

As a reminder, Israel has carried out several schemes throughout the decades to transfer Gaza’s population out of the Strip. Palestinian-Dutch analyst Mouin Rabbani wrote in Mondoweiss how, even before Israel occupied Gaza in 1967, it tried to push Palestinian refugees from Gaza to Libya and Iraq and, after its occupation, began encouraging emigration to the West Bank. In 1969, Israel attempted to send 60,000 Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Paraguay with payment and the promise of citizenship. The plan was discontinued after two Palestinian transferees killed an Israeli embassy staff member in Asuncion.

After the Knesset vote last year to annul part of the 2005 Disengagement Law, Israeli lawmakers came out in support of a return to Gaza. MK Son Har-Melech urged Israelis not to fall into complacency.

Image
Sara Malka of Crown Heights, Brooklyn protests in front of UN headquarters in New York against the removal of illegal Israeli settlers from Gaza in 2005. Mary Altaffer | AP

“We must not rest on our laurels or the euphoria of the moment,” Son Har-Melech said. “We must galvanize… the return home to the region of Gush Katif, which was abandoned [in 2005] in an act of terrible folly and has become a nest of terror.”

In a conversation with Israeli Channel 7, Minister of National Missions Orit Strock of the Religious Zionism party said, “I believe that, at the end of the day, the sin of the disengagement will be reversed.”

In response, the Israeli NGO Peace Now said, “It is clear that in addition to the judicial coup, a messianic revolution is taking place. This government will inevitably destroy our country. They will also deepen the occupation, ignite the region, and reestablish a Jewish supremacist regime from the river to the sea.”

“A HOUSE ON THE BEACH IS NOT A DREAM”

As the trend to recolonize Gaza spreads, Lynk considers the option of resettlement in Gaza — even with the state’s most right-wing government in its history — out of the question, explaining to MintPress News that:

If the Americans have already said they’re not in favor of resettling Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip into Egypt or elsewhere in the world, you can be sure the Americans, as much as they’ve protected Israel, would be against any idea of reestablishing Israeli settlements in Gaza.”

While Netanyahu appears to have brushed off the notion of Israeli resettlement in Gaza, saying in December that “it’s not a realistic goal,” he has endorsed military control of the Strip. “Gaza will be demilitarized, and there won’t be any military threat threatening Israel from the Strip. For this to happen, control of the area is required,” Netanyahu said.

That idea was reiterated by Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant this week when he unveiled his post-war plan for Gaza, which would see Israel keeping security control of the Strip with an Israeli-guided Palestinian body carrying out administrative responsibilities.

Mairav Zonszein, an analyst at the nonprofit the International Crisis Group, doesn’t believe that top Israeli officials making the decisions on Gaza are aiming for resettlement. Still, she also doesn’t rule out the possibility.

“That’s not on their agenda, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t come to a point where that would be part of what we see, just because… it’s becoming more of a war of attrition,” Zonszein told MintPress News, emphasizing that while it might not be Netanyahu’s goal, he also hasn’t condemned politicians advocating for resettlement.

The idea of recolonizing Gaza is also gaining momentum with the Israeli public. Images of Israeli soldiers waving Gush Katif settlement flags in Gaza have circulated online. Israeli singers Hanan Ben Ari and Narkis have sung about returning to the settlements when performing for soldiers.

The renowned Israeli singer Hanan Ben Ari performed at an Israeli military base near the Gaza envelope, singing “We are returning to Gush Katif.”

Gush Katif was an Israeli settlement situated in the heart of the Gaza Strip 18 years ago.
pic.twitter.com/aGxc0gY6yX

— Younis Tirawi | يونس (@ytirawi) October 24, 2023


A Channel 12 poll in November found that 44% of Israelis favor renewing settlement in Gaza. When asked what should happen with Gaza when the war is over, 32% answered, “Israel should remain permanently and renew Jewish settlement.”

Under the banner, “A house on the beach is not a dream!” Harei Zahav, an Israeli real estate firm known for building settlements in the West Bank, advertised building Gaza settlements, writing, “We have begun clearing rubble and fending off squatters.”

Yet since sparking controversy, the company’s CEO, Zeev Epshtein, said it was simply a bad joke.

“It was a sort of satirical idea,” Epshtein told Haaretz. “We’re not building, and we have no intention of building. We want it to happen, but it’s the state’s decision. We have no influence on it.”

Despite claiming it was satire, the social media blunder illustrates how Israelis are responding in this moment.

Image
Harei Zahav (Golden Mountains), a settlement development enterprise is advertising for #Gaza settlements: “a house on the beach is not a dream! We have begun clearing rubble and fending off squatters.” – Itay Epshtain

“[Harei Zahav] name half a dozen reestablished and new #Israeli settlements, and show their approximate location throughout occupied #Gaza,” Israeli human rights lawyer Itay Epshtain wrote on the social media platform X. “While this is a media stunt, it captures a deep sentiment favoring territorial acquisition and colonization at the expanse [sic] of #Palestinians.”

Other events discussing Gaza resettlement have occurred since Returning Home’s November event. In December, during the Jewish festival of Hanukkah, a coalition of settler-colonist groups held the Practical Preparation for Gaza Settlement Conference in Tel Aviv. At the end of December, another group pushing for resettlement, Going Home – Returning to Gush Katif, also held a discussion featuring leaders of the Nachala settler-colonist movement, Daniella Weiss and Zvi Elimelech Sharbaf.

Going Home – Returning to Gush Katif declined to speak with MintPress News. Nachala is a prominent sponsor of the resettlement campaign, even releasing advertisements after the Tel Aviv conference stating, “Gaza is the Land of Israel! Fight. Liberate. Settle,” along with a hotline to register with the movement.

Following the conference, ads were taken out stating “Gaza is the Land of Israel! Fight. Liberate. Settle.” Those interested are invited to call a registration hotline for re-established settlements in Gaza. pic.twitter.com/Y8RuHa72z4

— Itay Epshtain (@EpshtainItay) December 15, 2023


Nachala will hold a conference on January 28 in Jerusalem, presenting plans — including maps and the various stages — for colonizing Gaza. Nachala didn’t respond to MintPress News’ requests for comment but told Channel 12 that thousands of Israelis have expressed interest in joining the movement.

“The public demand for renewed settlement in the Gaza Strip is increasing. After the terrible massacre on October 7, there was a great call among the public that the victory of the war includes Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip,” Nachala representatives told Channel 12.

Zonszein explained how settlement and safety often go hand-in-hand in the Israeli perspective.

“What Israel is doing in Gaza is very much in line with what it’s always done to occupied Palestinian territory,” Zonszein said. “That you need to put people on the ground — settlers and soldiers — in order to provide security has always been part of the Israeli understanding of how to do things.”

So, as the weeks turn into months and war rages, Israel’s settler-colonist fantasy could very well manifest into reality.

Feature photo | A family flees the Al-Maghazi Refugee Camp with their belongings in the central Gaza Strip, on January 8, 2024. Majdi Fathi | NurPhoto via AP

*********

JANUARY 11, 2024 BY M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
Palestine: EU’s Borrell bats for US

Image
Video image of a Hezbollah anti-tank guided missile hitting a radar dome at Israeli air base on Mount Meron, Jan. 6, 2024

The diplomatic arena of the Middle East was dominated in the past week by the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s regional tour to Türkiye, Jordan, Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, the West Bank and Egypt. It was a ‘road show’ to rally the leaders of the Arab countries behind the US but culminated in an acrimonious meeting in the West Bank between Blinken and the Palestine President Mahmoud Abbas marred by “quarrels and arguments,” according to Sky News Arabia.

The region is gripped by angst that Israel may provoke a fateful expansion of the conflict in the Gaza Strip to Lebanon and Iran after the assassination of a number of senior military figures from Hamas and Hezbollah in the recent days, which overlapped Blinken’s presence in the region and underscored Tel Aviv’s disdain toward diplomatic niceties. Two videos from the West Bank showed Israeli troops shooting a 17-year-old boy and repeatedly running over the dead body of a man they had shot last Friday.

The US fears the expansion of the conflict in the Middle East. Yet, Blinken was burdened with the contradiction that the rhetoric of Washington’s continued support for the Israeli operation is so visibly at odds with the words of President Joe Biden last week that he was doing “quiet” work with the Israeli government “to get them to significantly reduce their presence and largely withdraw from the Gaza Strip.”

Blinken claimed that “the (Arab) countries agreed to work together to help the Gaza Strip stabilise, chart a political path for the Palestinians and work towards long-term peace, security and stability in the region.” At the same time, he conceded that to do this, it is necessary to end the conflict in Gaza and identify a concrete path to the creation of a Palestinian state. Blinken flagged that the countries of the region are still interested in normalising relations with Israel, but only on the terms of a settlement of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Arguably, these could be incipient signs of a road map emerging.

The killing of senior Hamas and Hezbollah officials indicates that Israel is not making significant progress on the battlefield and the leadership is under compulsion to gather ‘trophies’ and claim ‘victory’. In a hybrid war, such killings will not significantly weaken the resistance movement. An effective leader was appointed overnight to head the IRGC’S Quds Force when the legendary Iranian general Qassem Soleimani was assassinated in 2020.

That said, the probability of a direct conflict between Israel and Hezbollah should not be overestimated, since the latter is well aware that an outbreak of hostilities is precisely what suits Tel Aviv. Iran also sizes up Israel’s calculus to drag the US into the war. According to reports, Iran has supplied cruise missiles to Hezbollah.

Against such a tumultuous backdrop, in a carefully choreographed sideshow, the European Union’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell also appeared in the region at the same time as Blinken. Borrell’s destinations were Lebanon and Saudi Arabia. The EU announcement said that Borrell’s mission “will be an occasion to discuss all aspects of the situation in and around Gaza, including its impact on the region, especially the situation at the Israeli-Lebanese border, as well as the importance of avoiding regional escalation and of sustaining the flow of humanitarian assistance to civilians.”

While speaking to the media in Beirut, Borrell was highly critical of Israel’s war in Gaza and called for a pause “that could become a permanent one.” He also said, “It is imperative to avoid a regional escalation. It is absolutely necessary to avoid Lebanon being dragged into a regional conflict.” Borrell saw his mission as one to take stock of the situation and “to contribute to a way out of the crisis.”

Borrell met with the Head of Mission and Force Commander of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) General Aroldo Lazaro, a compatriot from Spain. Indeed, there has been some talk of deploying a peacekeeping force on Israel’s northern border with Lebanon.

Meanwhile, Al Jazeera reported, citing a government source in Beirut, that Borrell also had an unpublicised meeting with a delegation from Hezbollah led by Mohammad Raad, a member of the Lebanese legislature. Conceivably, this might have been a key item on his itinerary in Beirut.

While the US and several European countries, including Germany, the UK, Czech Republic, Austria, among others, regard Hezbollah as a terrorist organisation, the EU restricted itself to merely adding Hezbollah’s so-called “military wing” to its terror list, leaving the door open to interact with the movement’s political leadership if need arises.

That came in the wake of the group’s alleged 2012 suicide bus bombing in Burgas, Bulgaria, which killed five Israeli tourists and a Bulgarian driver. During a debate on the crisis situation in Lebanon last July, the European Parliament, for the first time, adopted a resolution calling for the EU to add the whole of Hezbollah to its list of banned terrorist organisations, but that hasn’t yet been acted upon.

Borrell’s meeting with the Hezbollah delegation would only have been with the knowledge of the Biden administration — it could even be providing a thinkable (and actionable) leitmotif of Borrell’s trip to Lebanon. BBC had reported a week ago on secret contacts between Israel and Hezbollah as well.

At any rate, by a coincidence, Borrell happened to be in Saudi Arabia when Blinken arrived there, and the two of them had a meeting. Later, in a prepared statement to the media after talks in Saudi Arabia with foreign minister Prince Faisal, Borrell also took a nuanced stance apropos Hamas, saying,

“And now we have to stop the killing of civilians in Gaza. We have to stop this great number of casualties. Hamas has to be eradicated. But Hamas is an idea, it represents an idea, and you cannot kill an idea. The only way of killing an idea –- a bad idea — is to propose a better one, to give a horizon to the Palestinian people, to their dignity, to their freedom, to their security, which has to go hand in hand with the security of Israel.”

Clearly, Borrell strove to break the ice by engaging with Hezbollah. Considering that the EU has been the US’ junior partner on major international issues, Borrell’s mission can be considered as substantive aimed at opening a diplomatic track to ease the Israel-Lebanon border tensions.

Equally, Borrell and Prince Faisal rekindled the so-called Peace Day Effort launched in September last year jointly by the EU with Saudi Arabia, the League of Arab States, Egypt and Jordan as an initiative “to reinvigorate the peace process in the Middle East.”

A joint statement issued at that time on the sidelines of the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, in the presence of almost fifty Foreign Ministers from around the world sought “to produce a “Peace Supporting Package” that will maximise peace dividends for the Palestinians and Israelis once they reach a peace agreement,… thus incentivising earnest efforts to reach it.”

As EU foreign policy chief, Borrell navigated international turbulence and divisions within the 28-member bloc to make Europe more united and turn it into a diplomatic heavyweight, but with patchy success. Of course, Ukraine spoiled the party. Palestine could well be Borrell’s last waltz. Borrell’s five-year term in Brussels ends in December.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/palesti ... ts-for-us/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Jan 13, 2024 12:14 pm

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 12
January 12, 2024
Rybar

Image

In the north of the Gaza Strip, bombing of several areas of the enclave's capital resumed: local residents reported explosions in Al - Sabra , Tell al - Hawa and Az - Zaytoun . Hamas militants carried out a series of attacks and, in their usual manner, reported huge successes, without providing any evidence.

In the area of ​​the isthmus between the northern and southern parts of the enclave, Israeli troops are trying to advance in the direction of Nuseirat , and are also conducting an assault on the Al - Breij camp . However, given the almost complete lack of communications and Internet in the region, it is extremely difficult to establish the configuration of the front in the area.

Near Khan Yunis, IDF units are still fighting in the areas of Jurat al - Lot and Botn al - Samin . The Israelis are concentrating forces near the building of the Islamic University , as well as the Halima Mosque , which was shelled by Palestinian forces with mortars today.

The situation in the Middle East has deteriorated significantly: the US- led coalition launched missile attacks on Houthi targets in Yemen using aircraft and ships. At the same time, pro-Iranian proxies launched drones towards Israel, however, apparently, none of the UAVs reached the target.

And in The Hague today the second day of hearings at the International Court of Justice came to an end : in response to yesterday’s accusations from South Africa, the Israeli delegation declared its commitment to international law and pointed out the retaliatory nature of the IDF’s actions. Although no matter what decision the court makes, it will still not be able to stop the fighting in the Gaza Strip.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

Image
Compared to yesterday, the situation in the north of the enclave has become somewhat tense: Palestinian media reported a series of powerful bombings in the areas of Al - Sabra , Tell al - Hawa and Az - Zaytoun , which resulted in some damage and casualties. In addition, footage of the current state of most of the housing stock in Gaza continues to appear on the Internet: almost completely destroyed houses or buildings in disrepair. We have already written that the Israelis, in an attempt to save their fighters, dropped hundreds of ammunition on residential areas, destroying both buildings there and everyone who did not manage to leave the danger zone.


Consequences of the attack on the Az-Zaytoun area in Gaza

At the same time, through resources controlled by Hamas militants, it was reported that Palestinians were attacking the positions of Israeli troops in Jabaliya and in the Sheikh Ajlin area . However, there is no talk yet of resuming fighting at the same intensity. At the moment, the main goal for the Israeli command is to clear the territories and destroy underground communications of Hamas, avoiding high casualties.

Center of the Gaza Strip

Image
In the area of ​​the isthmus between the northern and southern parts of the enclave, Israeli troops continue to attempt to advance towards Nuseirat , and are also conducting an assault on the Al-Breij camp . Massive artillery and air strikes are being carried out on populated areas, but footage of the consequences of fire damage comes only from Nuseirat: for example, today a mosque, a school, a kindergarten and residential buildings were destroyed. At the same time, units of the Israel Defense Forces are fighting on the outskirts of Al - Maghazi , and are also trying to advance along the Salah ad-Din highway both to encircle Al - Maghazi and to advance in the direction of Deir al - Balah .

At the same time, against the backdrop of discussions about shutting down the telephone network and the Internet in the Gaza Strip, reports began to spread about the Israelis allegedly advancing towards the Shahda al-Aqsa hospital in the southeast of Deir al - Balakh . However, there were no personnel or statements from the parties about the fighting in this area.

South Gaza Strip

Image
In the south, the situation remains unchanged: the Israelis are attacking in the direction of the southeastern and southwestern outskirts of Khan Yunis . The most fierce fighting is taking place in the areas of Jurat al - Lot and Botn al - Samin . Given the lack of personnel and the shutdown of communications and the Internet throughout the enclave, it is extremely difficult to establish the front configuration solely on text messages. Judging by the statements of the Palestinian formations, units of the Israel Defense Forces are still concentrating forces near the building of the Islamic University , as well as the Halima Mosque. On the latter, today the militants fired mortars, reporting in the usual manner about the defeat of the IDF’s manpower.


If there is practically no information about the progress of the parties, then reports are published almost every hour about massive attacks on Khan Yunis and its suburbs. Over the past months, this area has been regularly bombed by the Israeli Air Force, however, the Israelis have not yet been able to achieve significant success in dense urban development.

Border with Lebanon

Image
Mutual exchanges of blows continue on the Israeli-Lebanese border. During the day, Hezbollah fighters reported shelling of IDF positions near Kibbutz Hanita , Menara , Ruweisat al - Asi , in the vicinity of the Hadab al - Bustan military site and at Shebaa Farms . In turn, Israeli troops once again attacked areas in southern Lebanon: artillery strikes were carried out on the settlements of Ad - Jibane , Aytarun , Teir Harfa , Alma al - Shaab , Marwahin , Kfar Qila and Yarin . In addition, the IDF carried out airstrikes on Mays al - Jabal , Houla and Jebel Balat . One person was reportedly injured in Khiam , and the Lebanese Red Cross was able to evacuate the victim.

West Bank

Image
Raids by Israeli security forces in several settlements continue in the region. This time, the most violent clashes took place in the Nur Shams camp in Tulkarm , where an Israeli armored column was fired upon and pelted with explosive devices by local militants. One person was injured.


To combat supporters of terrorist cells, additional forces were sent to the city, and exit from the locality was blocked. Engineering equipment was actively used to block roads, including bulldozers, which lifted the top layer of the road surface and made “barriers” out of it.


At the same time, Palestinian media reported the destruction by Israeli bulldozers of infrastructure on the central Tulkarm Street, as well as the cemetery in the Nur Shams camp.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

Yesterday evening, pro-Iranian groups using a kamikaze drone attacked a US military base near Erbil airport in Iraq:


The Kurdistan Autonomous Region's counter-terrorism service reported intercepting the drone and published photographs of the wreckage. And in Syria, the so-called “Islamic Resistance in Iraq” launched a missile attack on the positions of American troops near the Conoco gas processing plant in the province of Deir ez - Zor . One of the rockets fell into the air

In addition, pro-Iranian groups reported attacks on military installations of the Israel Defense Forces in Eilat and near Georgia Park . However, the Israeli media did not report any interception or hits in the indicated areas. Probably, the ammunition of the pro-Iranian proxies either could not reach the specified targets, or they did not exist at all.


And the coalition led by the United States launched a missile attack on Houthi targets in Yemen using aircraft and ships. The targets were UAV assembly points and positioning areas. In total, more than 100 missiles were fired. According to representatives of the Ansarallah group , five people were killed and six more were injured.

Political-diplomatic background
On Israel's response to South Africa's accusations at the International Court of Justice


Today was the second day of hearings at the United Nations International Court of Justice in The Hague regarding Israeli accusations of genocide and war crimes in the Gaza Strip : after yesterday's speech, the delegation of the South African Republic gave the floor to the Israeli side.

The first to speak was the legal adviser of the Israeli Foreign Ministry , Tal Bekker , who stated that Israel was waging a “ defensive war ” against Hamas. He rejected the opposing side's accusations of genocide as " baseless " and reproached South Africa for acting as an emissary of Palestinian factions.

Malcolm Shaw , Israel's next spokesman, concluded that " there is no genocide in Gaza " because Israel has no such intentions. He stressed that any attempts by his country to reduce civilian deaths had gone “ unnoticed .”

A third lawyer, Galit Raguan , blamed Hamas for the mass deaths of civilians in the Gaza Strip. According to her, urban wars will always lead to casualties and damage, however, in the case of Gaza, the situation worsened because these were the desired results of Hamas .

Omri Sender , another Israeli official, noted that South Africa did not mention Israel's " extraordinary efforts " to improve the humanitarian situation: the number of food trucks entering the besieged enclave has increased in recent weeks and that access to water is a "priority" for Israel.

In general, the Israelis’ speech was built on the basis that Tel Aviv’s actions were justified because they were retaliatory. To be convincing, the defense recalled the Holocaust and presented at the debate a recording of a conversation in which a Hamas militant bragged to his parents about the murder of ten Jews.

However, no matter what decision the International Court makes, it will not be able to stop the fighting in the Gaza Strip.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

These lawyers for the Zionists seem to be auditioning for a job with Trump.

It is objectionable to refer to Hamas or other pro-Palestinian forces as "terrorists" They are in fact counter-terrorists. Dunno how long I can continue using this source if he keeps up this gross misrepresentation, recent Russian history be damned(Chechnya).

Google Translator

******

Palestinians Collectively Return to North Gaza: ‘We Will Not Be Displaced Twice’
JANUARY 11, 2024

Image
The destruction of Al-Faluja Neighborhood near Jabalia Camp in the Gaza Strip on January 1st 2024. Photo: Muhammad Mahmoud Balousha / Youssef Fares Channel.

Palestinian journalist Yousef Fares reports from Gaza for Al-Akhbar.

In the old streets of Gaza, the road connecting the northern governorate of Gaza with the eastern neighborhoods of the city, such as Al-Tuffah, Haraat al-Dara, and Shuja’iyya, has become the only route for the residents of the northern Gaza Strip to reach the western areas of the city. This is due to the constant attacks on the direct routes that traverse the western neighborhoods. Over the past few days, this road has been traveled by hundreds of families who have decided to return to the neighborhoods recently vacated by the occupation forces.

From Beit Lahia and Beit Hanoun to Sheikh Radwan, Al-Alami, Tal al-Zaatar, Al-Sika, and even Sufatawi and Al-Tawam, the residents, after more than three months of displacement, have taken the incredible risk of returning home. “We have nothing to lose; we know our homes are destroyed, but a tent on the ruins of our house is a million times better than the life of displacement in shelters,” says Haji Souhaila Al-Safi in an interview with Al-Akhbar. Sitting on a cart pulled by a donkey, accompanied by 10 members of her family, covered with blankets and clothes, she adds: “We will not be displaced again, and there is nothing left to fear. Our lives are in Allah’s hands, not Netanyahu’s.”

As for Abu Mahmoud Akil, he packed his belongings to return to the neighborhood of Tal Al-Zaatar after spending about two months in the industrial building belonging to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Refugees (UNRWA) west of Gaza City. Despite the continuous artillery shelling in the area he plans to go to and he is steadfast in this plan to return. The man, carrying a large bag covered with blankets on his back, says, “We are going back, not just because we are tired of being displaced, but because we live in a peripheral area in northern Gaza, and staying there is resistance to the enemy’s plans to displace and uproot us. Today, the resistance has played its role, and now it’s our turn to stay in our homes despite the difficult circumstances.”

In Tal Al-Zaatar, the ground operation has completely cut off the electricity grid, sewage lines, and water supply, and the utterly destroyed streets of the neighborhood which require the dexterity of a circus performer to navigate them. Those who choose to return there will have to walk for two hours every morning to get water. Despite its high salinity, the locals use this water for cleaning, drinking, and cooking. Additionally, the neighborhood, located east of Jabalia camp and strategically elevated compared to the surrounding neighborhoods, experiences a severe wave of loneliness in the evening: it has no electricity and not a single source of light breaking the darkness. To add to this, the darkness of nightfall always accompanies an increased rate of occupation artillery strikes.

Despite the challenges, the influx of residents to the neighborhood increases day by day, as there is something far more important than the difficulties of this life. Abu Alaa, a father of three martyrs, whose house and four of his relatives’ houses were destroyed, said in his interview with Al-Akhbar, “Today, we returned to Tal Al-Zaatar, and we walked in the middle of the street until we were photographed by a reconnaissance plane. I am proud to live in a tent that leaks during the winter, proud that I spend every day searching for water and firewood, and proud that I live through all this suffering because all of this is in defiance of the Israeli arrogance. We thought we would be displaced from northern Gaza as soon as they said, ‘Go to the south,’ but today, we defeat them by staying here despite the fear and difficult conditions.”

In the streets, there is a significant debate about the future of the residents who left the northern Gaza Strip for the south. In her interview with Al-Akhbar, Umm Saber al-Rashayida said: “The ghosts of the first migration haunt my thoughts; they told us then it would only be for two weeks, and we would return, but we stayed for 80 years.” She added, “The Nakba is deeply rooted in my mind, so I did not leave. That’s why I returned to the Al-Sika neighborhood, even though shells fall around us all day and night.”

https://orinocotribune.com/palestinians ... ced-twice/

********

Israel Dismisses Genocidal Intent as ‘Random Assertions’
January 12, 2024

A barrister for Israel argued that Israeli prime minister and cabinet members’ statements of intent to commit genocide were mere “random assertions,” and he instead accused South Africa of complicity in genocide, reports Joe Lauria.

Image
Barrister Malcolm Shaw arguing for Israel before the World Court on Friday. (UN TV Screenshot)

By Joe Lauria
Special to Consortium News

In its defense against allegations by South Africa that it is committing genocide in Gaza, a British barrister arguing at the World Court on Friday for Israel downplayed numerous statements by senior Israeli officials of genocidal intent against Palestinians as mere “random assertions” that prove nothing.

Instead, the barrister turned the tables, accusing South Africa itself of complicity in genocide.

Kings Counselor Malcolm Shaw, for Israel, told the Court on the second day of a two-day hearing:

“As far as acts are concerned in this case, there is little beyond random assertions to demonstrate that Israel has or has had the specific intent to destroy in whole or in part the Palestinian people as such.”

Without proving intent, Shaw argued, a genocide case is impossible. “It is like Hamlet without the prince, a car without an engine,” he said. As Shaw himself pointed out, lawyers for South Africa on Thursday thus “placed considerable emphasis upon intent.”

They laid out in great detail the “genocidal rhetoric” of Israeli officials and how it has influenced Israeli soldiers and airmen attacking Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu twice referred to an Old Testament genocide implying the same was needed for Gaza, argued attorney Tembeka Ngcukaitobi.

“The genocidal invocation to Amalek was anything but idle,” Ngcukaitobi said. He then showed a video of Israeli soldiers singing in celebration of a victory in Gaza, in which they mention Amalek.

On Oct. 9, Defense Minister, Yoav Gallant, Ngcukaitobi, went on:

“gave a situation update to the Army where he said that as Israel was imposing a complete siege on Gaza, there would be ‘no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel,’ everything would be closed because Israel is fighting human animals. Speaking to troops on the Gaza border, he instructed them that he has released all the restraints and that Gaza won’t return to what it was before.

‘We will eliminate everything. We will reach all places. Eliminate everything there, reach all places without any restraints.’

Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu said that Israel must find ways for Gazans that are more painful than death. It is no answer to say that neither are in command of the army. They are ministers in the Israeli government. They vote in the Knesset and are in a position to shape state policy. The intent to destroy Gaza has been nurtured at the highest levels of state. …

Senior political and military officials encouraged without censure, the 95 year old Israeli army reservist Ezra Yachin, a veteran of the Deir Yassin massacre against the Palestinians in 1948, to speak to the soldiers ahead of the ground invasion in Gaza. In his talk, he echoed the same sentiment while being driven around in an official Israeli army vehicle dressed in Israeli army fatigue.

‘I quote the triumphant and finish them off and don’t leave anyone behind. Erase the memory of them. Erase them, their families, mothers and children. These animals can no longer live. If you have an Arab neighbor, don’t wait. Go to his home and shoot him. We want to invade. Not like before. We want to enter and destroy what’s in front of us and destroy houses.'”


Image
Shaw argues his case. (UN TV Screenshot)

These are some of what Shaw dismissed on Friday as “random assertions.” The barrister said that only Israel’s ministerial committee on national security and the war cabinet can make decisions on policy and intent in Gaza. “To produce random quotes that are not in conformity with government policy is misleading at best,” he said.

However, both Netanyahu and Gallant, whose “genocidal” statements were quoted by the South African lawyers, are members of the war cabinet. Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich are on the national security committee, and both have made numerous statements about Palestinians that can be construed as genocidal in intent.

Shaw only mentioned the South Africans quoting the heritage minister who is not on either committee and ignored reference to those ministers who are.

And in response to South Africa on Thursday linking ministers’ “genocidal” statements to that of Israeli combatants, Shaw said “remarks or actions of a soldier do not and cannot reflect policy.”

Shaw contended that Israel’s intent is not genocide but to “deal with Hamas” in response to its Oct. 7 attack on Israel, which he called itself “genocidal.” He said: “The truth is that if there has been any genocidal activity in this situation, it was the events of seventh of October.”

Shaw ridiculed South Africa’s argument on Thursday of the need for historical context to place Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack in a 75-year history of Israeli dispossession and abuses of Palestinians.

Shaw asked why not go back to the 1922 decision of the League of Nations to create the British mandate in Palestine, or the 1917 Balfour Declaration that demonstrated Britain’s intent to create a Jewish homeland in Palestine or even to mention the Israelite tribes in there 3,000 years ago?

Israel Turns Tables, Accuses South Africa of ‘Complicity’ With Genocide

Shaw went further, alleging that indeed “complicity in genocide is in play” in the case. But he was not referring to the United States, Britain, Germany or any other ally of Israel that continues to supply weapons, ammunition, funding and two U.S. carrier groups in the region to deter any nation that dares intervene to stop Israel’s slaughter, as the U.S. did against Yemen on Thursday.

No, Shaw was referring to “states that supported, condoned, praised or glorified the events of the seventh of October both at the time, and later” who he said “stand guilty of a violation of Article 3e of the Convention as being complicit in genocide and indeed of the duty to prevent genocide under Article 1.”

And then Shaw said: “South Africa has given succor and support to Hamas, at the least.”

Image
Tal Becker at the World Court Friday. (UN TV Screenshot)

Tal Becker, a legal adviser to the Israeli Foreign Ministry who addressed the court before Shaw, told the Court that “on October 7th, before any military response by Israel, South Africa issued an official statement blaming Israel for, quote, the recent conflagration.”

Becker then leveled his accusation that South Africa was complicit with a genocidal organization. He said:

“The absurd upshot of South Africa’s argument is under the guise of the allegation against Israel of genocide, this court is asked to call for an end to operations against the ongoing attacks of an organization that pursues an actual genocidal agenda.

That is an unconscionable request and it is respectfully submitted that it cannot stand. … The court is informed of the events of October 7th, because if there are any provisional measures that should appropriately be indicated here, they are indeed with respect to South Africa. It is a matter of public record that South Africa enjoys close relations with Hamas, despite its formal recognition as a terrorist organization by numerous states across the world.

South Africa has long hosted and celebrated its ties with Hamas figures, including a senior Hamas delegation that incredibly visited the country for, quote, solidarity just weeks after the massacre. In justifying instituting proceedings, South Africa makes much of its obligations under the Genocide Convention. It seems fitting, then, that it be instructed to comply with those obligations itself to end its own language of delegitimization, of Israel’s existence and its support for Hamas.”


Becker then blamed South Africa for “weaponizing” genocide. He said:

“The attempt to weaponize the term genocide against Israel in the present context does more than tell the court a grossly distorted story. And it does more than empty the word of its unique force and special meaning. It subverts the object and purpose of the convention itself with ramifications for all states seeking to defend themselves against those who demonstrate total disdain for life and for the law.”

For good measure, Becker threw in this deceptive remark about Hamas, referring to “Hamas’s violent takeover in 2007.” Hamas was elected in 2006. It later fought against Fatah to essentially defend its election, but it is false to say Hamas took over Gaza violently.

In a similarly deceptive manner, lawyers for Israel tried to explain away the destruction of nearly half the buildings of Gaza in the past three months as resulting from Hamas booby-traps and its errant rockets.

Israel’s ‘Warnings’

Image
Shaw arguing on Friday at World Court with South Africa delegation looking on. (UN TV Screenshot)

Shaw claimed that Israel warns civilians of impending attack through the “unprecedented and extensive use” of telephone calls and leafletting. Typically these calls give residents ten minutes to leave their buildings before they are bombed. The leaflets told residents of northern Gaza to move south where they were then bombed enroute and repeatedly in the south once they arrived there.

But Shaw argued that these warnings, coupled with Israel’s “facilitation” of humanitarian aid all “demonstrate the precise opposite of any possible genocidal intent” by Israel.

The U.N. has repeatedly complained that Israel is severely restricting the amount of aid being allowed into Gaza compared to 500 trucks a day before its military operation began on Oct. 7. Gallants statement that there would be “‘no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel,” flies in the face of a contention that Israeli is “facilitating” humanitarian aid.

Malcolm argued that the World Court did not have jurisdiction to hear South Africa’s case because South Africa did not establish that there was a dispute between two states. Shaw said that South Africa did not wait for a reply to its note verbal before launching the case against it at the ICJ on Dec. 29.

The jurisdiction for any question of war crimes needed to be in Israel, Shaw said. If in the course of its action against Hamas Israel overstepped the laws of war it would “tackled at the appropriate time” by Israel’s “robust legal system,” he said.

Israel’s ‘Right to Self Defense’

Image
Judges hear case against Israel. (UN TV Screenshot)

Both Shaw and Becker sought to twist the argument of British barrister Vaughn Lowe, who on Thursday argued before the court that based on a past World Court ruling Israel had no right to self-defense on the occupied territory of Palestine.

He did not say they had no right to defend itself on Israeli territory. But this is what Shaw and Becker tried to elude. Becker quote from Lowe’s writing that:

“The source of the attack, whether a state or non-state actor, is irrelevant to the existence of the right to defense force may be used to avert a threat because no one and no state is obliged by law passively to suffer the delivery of an attack.”

Neither Shaw nor Becker addressed the heart of the matter upon which the World Court had ruled, namely that Israel had no right to self-defense on a territory it occupies.

Lowe on Thursday referred to the 2004 World Court decision against the legality of Israel’s wall, which is built on occupied Palestinian territory.

“In its advisory opinion on the wall case, the court noted that the threat that Israel had argued justified the construction of the wall was not imputed to a foreign state, but emanated from the occupied Palestinian territory over which Israel itself exercises control,” Lowe said.

“For those reasons, the court decided, as a matter of international law, the right of self-defense under Article 51 of the charter, the U.N. Charter, had no relevance in such circumstances,” he said.

Just three weeks ago the U.N. Security Council reaffirmed that Gaza is occupied territory, he said. “The tightness of its grip may have varied, but no one can doubt the continuous reality of Israel’s grip on Gaza,” Lowe said.

“The court’s legal holding from 2004 holds good, and a similar point is to be made here what Israel is doing in Gaza, it is doing in territory under its own control. Its actions are enforcing its occupation. The law on self-defense under Article 51 of the U.N. Charter has no application,” he said.

THIS IS A DEVELOPING STORY. PLEASE COME BACK FOR UPDATES.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/01/12/i ... ssertions/

*****

Israel's well-oiled PR machine collapses

Hasbara, a Hebrew term uniquely associated with Israel's global propaganda efforts, has utterly failed to counter the pro-Palestinian narrative in the Gaza war. As a frontline tool for Tel Aviv's national security strategy, losing its Hasbara power is equal to losing its qualitative military edge.


Ali Choukeir

JAN 11, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

“Israel condemns South Africa’s decision to play advocate for the devil.”

“History will judge South Africa for its criminal complicity with the bloodiest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, and it will judge it without mercy.”

With these highly emotive words, Israeli government spokesman Eylon Levy lashed out at South Africa for filing a lawsuit before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the genocidal Israeli military assault that has killed more than 22,000 civilians in Gaza and injured tens of thousands more.

As the war in Gaza enters its fourth month, Israel faces challenges in shaping international public opinion despite its substantial Hasbara propaganda machine, and a significant budget allocated to ‘public diplomacy’ activities globally. Observers and researchers say the occupation state is losing the propaganda war, ceding its long-cultivated ‘victim’ image to one of a perpetrator of horrendous war crimes.

Hasbara is part of Israel's ‘national security’

Following the Hamas-led Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October aimed at targeting the occupation army's Gaza Division and taking captives to advance a prisoner swap deal, Israel intensified its media and digital diplomacy efforts, alongside its military and security actions. Recognizing the importance of framing those events to shape public perception, Israel made every effort to construct unimpeachable narratives that cast the Palestinian resistance actions as ‘terrorism,’ both domestically and internationally.

But faced with unprecedented levels of pro-Palestinian activism on social media and on the ground in the form of global protests, Israel and its western allies collaborated heavily on quashing those counter-narratives in order to create support for Tel Aviv's military assault on Gaza.

Greg Shupack’s book, The Wrong Story: Palestine, Israel and the Media, highlights three central frameworks that form the foundations of Israel's narrative to the west:

Creating equal blame between both parties to the conflict.
Framing ‘extremists’ as the main obstacle to peace efforts and undermining moderate voices.
Emphasizing Israel's right to ‘self-defense’ even in the face of unarmed protests, with little regard for Palestinian rights.
These frameworks essentially guide western mainstream media coverage of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Though, additionally, Israel leverages historical claims to Palestinian land and anti-Semitism accusations to shape its narrative and appeal to western sympathy.

Several key Hasbara strategies were employed to impact the western media narrative following Operation Al-Aqsa Flood:

First, the tapping into the western conscience: Both at official and popular levels, this involves associating Hamas with ISIS (“The world defeated ISIS. The world will defeat Hamas”) and framing 7 October as Israel’s 9/11. This tactic aims to create an emotional connection by reducing what can be termed the ‘emotional gap.’

Second, falsifying facts and fabricating lies: This tactic plays a significant role, taking advantage of the ‘anchoring bias,’ which involves presenting a version of events that influences how subsequent information is perceived, such as the notorious allegation, now debunked, of 40 beheaded babies. Utilizing this strategy, Israeli President Isaac Herzog, for example, claimed that Hamas fighters have instructions on how to make chemical weapons.

Third, paid advertising and utilizing influencers: High profile social media figures like Elon Musk were flown into Israel for PR stunts while in a little over a week, Israel’s Foreign Affairs Ministry ran 30 ads that have been seen over four million times on his platform X.

Fourth, establishing the idea of cultural difference: By dehumanizing and ‘othering’ the Palestinians, Israel seeks to emphasize its unique connection to western civilization in West Asia. Statements by Israeli officials, such as Defense Minister Yoav Gallant's use of the words "fighting human animals" and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's call for the civilized world to combat "barbarians," contribute to this narrative.

The information war shifts dramatically

It can be argued that Operation Al Aqsa Flood constituted a qualitative leap for the Palestinian cause in the media realm, based on the results reaped from massive global public interaction, inputs from global influencers, large demonstrations in many countries – all of which have slowly seeped into the corporate media coverage.

Despite the vast disparities between Palestinians and Israelis in terms of capabilities, technologies, material resources, and major media reach, social media became the great equalizer in this information war, making it increasingly difficult for establishment outlets to ignore the new global discourse on Palestinian developments and events.

Equally important to Hasbara's failings is the recognition of Palestinian performance and narrative in the information war:

Israelis are now forced to chase down their top allies to help salvage their narrative shortcomings, as in when President Herzog complained to British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak about defining Hamas as a terrorist organization. UPDAY, Europe's largest news group, was revealed to have instructed its staff to prioritize the Israeli point of view, minimize coverage of Palestinian deaths, avoid pro-Palestinian headlines, and formulate comments by Israeli politicians in a way that dehumanizes their adversaries. These kinds of revelations have prompted audiences everywhere to read their media with a pinch of salt.

More instructive is the growing numbers of journalists and political figures who have left their organizations in protest of the enforced pro-Israel discourse, with prominent celebrities being sacked for public stances that favor the Palestinian perspective.

Western and Israeli media performances have diminished public trust in the Israeli and western narrative globally, particularly over wild, unsubstantiated allegations, all now proven false, that Hamas "beheaded 40 babies," ran its operations from a command center under Shifa Hospital, and was in active pursuit of chemical weapons capabilities. US President Joe Biden’s quickly debunked endorsement of the claim that babies had been beheaded based on “photos he has seen,” also played a role in this shift.

Media professionals and politicians are also increasingly undermining the Israeli narrative by employing the term ‘genocide’ rather than ‘self-defense’ – largely because international organizations have now weighed in to provide facts and figures showing that Tel Aviv indiscriminately kills civilians, in greater numbers and with greater firepower than in any other conflict this century.

They have even begun to undermine their own tired argument that "anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism," as western political leaders rush to differentiate Netanyahu's jingoistic right-wing coalition with the rest of Israel's body politic, though that is mainly because they need to unseat the former in order to rehabilitate Israel's post-war image.

In the meantime, the Palestinian narrative emphasizes resistance to Israel's ongoing oppression, and has succeeded in contextualizing the events of 7 October as a justifiable resistance by Gaza, "the largest open-air prison in the world," against 75 uninterrupted years of inhumane oppression – an oppression the world has come to intimately understand through three harrowing months of genocide on their X, Instagram, TikTok and Facebook platforms.

Because the mainstream media has had to – at least gratuitously – provide some balance to the biggest news story of the day, Palestinian historical context has seeped into the news, as seen in myriad interviews, such as with Palestine's ambassador to Britain Husam Zomlot, which helped to extend public understanding beyond recent events.

Despite ferocious Israeli efforts to restrict the Palestinian narrative in western nations, pro-Palestine protests have grown unchecked, and hashtags like #StandWithPalestine continue to dominate social media platforms. The hashtag reached over 4.8 billion views, outpacing #StandWithIsrael on TikTok, even amid the many restrictions in play.

In attempting to gain and maintain global sympathy on the back of 7 October events, Israel's disinformation and deceptive tactics through its global Hasbara apparatus has faced significant setbacks and backlashes, which may have been entirely avoided had it not chosen to blow Gaza to bits.

The vicious murder and maiming of tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, mostly women, children and refugees, in Tel Aviv's almost gleeful rage-fest that followed Hamas' operation, has permanently flipped Israel's David vs Goliath narrative. And its collaborating western allies have suffered an equal blow in the social media realm, as all of Israel's debunked storylines were parroted verbatim in major western capitals.

Gaza has undoubtedly thrust the Palestinian cause back into the global spotlight, gaining support at popular levels rarely seen globally, and increasing pressure on governments, NGOs, and media outlets to both acknowledge and address Israel's ongoing genocide.

Given the now obvious challenges Tel Aviv faces in achieving its stated military goals, even a nominal field victory for Netanyahu can no longer make up for the country's Hasbara collapse. It is a national security disaster that more than matches a military loss. For Israel, this war was lost from the moment it dropped bombs on homes in the Gaza Strip.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/israe ... -collapses

Israeli army ordered mass Hannibal Directive on 7 Oct: Media

An investigation from Israel's leading newspaper indicates Israel deliberately killed many of its own civilians and soldiers during Hamas' Operation Al-Aqsa Flood to prevent them being taken captive back to Gaza

News Desk

JAN 11, 2024

Image
An Israeli soldier walks by a house destroyed during fighting in Kibbutz Be'eri on 7 October (Baz Ratner/AP)

The Israeli military implemented the “Hannibal Directive” during Hamas’ attack on 7 October, killing some of its own civilians and soldiers to prevent Hamas from taking them as captives back to Gaza, according to an investigation by Israel’s leading newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth, which will be published in full on 12 January.

The Hebrew edition of the paper wrote on 11 January that “one of the revelations revealed in the investigation is that at noon on October 7, the IDF [Israeli army] ordered all of its combat units in practice to use the ‘Hannibal Procedure’ although without clearly mentioning this explicitly by name.”

The order was to stop “at all costs any attempt by Hamas terrorists to return to Gaza, that is, despite the fear that some of them have abductees,” the paper wrote.

The Times of Israel described how the Hannibal procedure, or directive, "allows soldiers to use potentially massive amounts of force to prevent a soldier from falling into the hands of the enemy. This includes the possibility of endangering the life of the soldier in question in order to prevent his capture.”

A previous Haaretz investigation of the directive concluded that “from the point of view of the army, a dead soldier is better than a captive soldier who himself suffers and forces the state to release thousands of captives in order to obtain his release.”

During the 7 October attack, Hamas and other Palestinians successfully took some 240 Israeli soldiers and civilians from the settlements (also known as kibbutzim) and military bases back to Gaza as captives.

Hamas hoped to exchange them for the thousands of Palestinians, including women and children, held in Israeli prisons.

Hamas used the Toyota pick-up trucks and motorcycles with which they entered Israel, as well as cars stolen from the settlements, to take Israeli captives back to Gaza. Some were also taken to Gaza on foot and even in carts pulled by tractors by other Palestinians who crossed into Israel after the Hamas fighters breached the border fence.

According to Yediot Ahronoth, about a thousand “terrorists and infiltrators” were killed in the area between the settlements and the Gaza Strip.

But the paper added it is not clear at this time how many of the Israeli abductees were killed due to the activation of the Hannibal directive:

“In the week after the attack, soldiers of elite units checked about 70 vehicles that were left in the area between the settlements and the Gaza Strip. These are vehicles that did not reach Gaza, because on the way they were shot by a combat helicopter, an anti-tank missile or a tank, and at least in some cases everyone in the vehicle was killed.”

As journalist Dan Cohen reported, the Israeli military killed Efrat Katz, age 68, as she was being taken from Kibbutz Nir Oz to Gaza on a cart pulled by a tractor on 7 October. Her daughter, Doron Katz-Asher, and two granddaughters, Raz, age 2, and Aviv, age 4, were also in the cart.

Doron Katz-Asher later told Israel’s Channel 12 that the Israeli army opened fire on the tractor, injuring her two daughters and killing her mother, Efrat.

As previously reported by The Cradle, Israeli Air Force (reserve) Col. Nof Erez described Israel’s actions on 7 October as a “mass Hannibal” event“ in response to the use of Apache helicopters and tanks. “What we saw here was a mass Hannibal. There were many openings in the fence, thousands of people in many different vehicles with hostages and without,” he told Haaretz.

The revelation that the Israeli military informally issued the Hannibal Directive raises questions about the deaths of many Israeli civilians who were initially presumed taken captive by Hamas on 7 October but whose bodies were later discovered near the Gaza border fence.

For example, 80-year-old Carmela Dan and her 12-year-old autistic granddaughter Noya both vanished on the morning of 7 October. The family assumed both were taken captive by Hamas. But two weeks later, Israeli authorities announced their bodies “were found near the border fence,” Foreign Policy reported.

On 19 October, Carmela’s niece told NBC News, “There was an operation by the Israeli army some days ago at this point to retrieve bodies, and we believe that it took them time to run what we know to be three DNA tests and to identify that it was both of them.”

In another widely reported case, an Israeli brigadier general, Barak Hiram, acknowledged to the New York Times that he gave an order on 7 October for a tank commander to open fire on a home in Kibbutz Be’eri to kill Hamas fighters, even though 14 Israeli captives were barricaded inside the home as well.

At roughly sundown, Hiram told the tank commander: “The negotiations are over. Break in, even at the cost of civilian casualties.”

The Hamas fighters and all but one of the captives were killed, including 12-year-old twins Liel and Yanai Hetzroni. Their bodies were so severely damaged and burned that it took weeks to identify them.

In an interview with Channel 12 on 26 October, before Hiram had publicly acknowledged giving the order to fire on the home in Be’eri, the general alluded to his logic on 7 October. He stated, “I am very afraid that if we return to Sorana [Israeli military headquarters in Tel Aviv] and try to hold all kinds of negotiations, we may fall into a trap that will tie our hands and not allow us to do what is required, which is to go in, manipulate, and kill them [Hamas] ...”

In another case in Be’eri, an elderly couple, Mati and Amir Weiss, were allegedly killed by Hamas fighters who entered their home on the morning of 7 October. Mati sent a message to their son Yuval that the fighters had entered the house and that Amir had been shot.

Yuval, who was a member of the kibbutz security team, provided their location to commanders in the army, telling them Hamas fighters were inside the home.

To explain the elderly couple’s death, Haaretz writes, “Mati and Amir Weiss were attacked by terrorists who blew up one of the walls of their safe room and shot them.”

But the picture of the Weiss home published by Haaretz shows a massive hole in the wall of the home and significant damage to the roof, suggesting a tank shell or helicopter strike had hit it.

The Hannibal Directive was also evident on 7 October at the Nova music festival, where Hamas allegedly massacred 364 Israeli partygoers.

Though Israeli army ground units did not respond to the Hamas attack on 7 October for many hours, the Southern District Commander of the Israeli Police, Maj. Gen. Amir Cohen gave the order, code-named “Philistine Horseman,” at 6:42 am to dispatch Border Police units to various sites to confront the Hamas attack.

These units included elite counter-terror units, known as Yamam, who were dispatched by helicopter, according to Israeli officials speaking with the New York Times.

These units apparently opened fire on partygoers as Hamas was taking people captive.

Germany’s Bild reported the testimony of Maya P., who survived the festival. Bild writes, “The terrorists who set up the road blockades came disguised as police officers and soldiers.”

“People ran into them hoping to be rescued, and then they were executed,” Maya said, crying.

Another survivor, Yuval Tahupi, stated to CNN, “A police lady told us most of the terrorists are dressing like soldiers, as cops, as security guards, so don’t trust anyone.”

Both Maya and Yuval could not imagine that Israeli forces had fired on them, so they assumed Hamas fighters must have been disguised as soldiers and police.

Israeli attack helicopters also were deployed to the Nova site, opening fire on partygoers as well.

Haaretz reported that “According to a police source, an investigation into the incident also revealed that an IDF combat helicopter that arrived at the scene from the Ramat David base fired at the terrorists and apparently also hit some of the revelers who were there.”

The BBC documented an apparent instance of the Hannibal Directive by helicopter fire. The British state broadcaster writes that car dash cam footage its journalists reviewed shows “a group of men appear. Only one is armed - they appear to be there to loot … Two people, a man and a woman, who were hiding in a car are discovered and led away.”

“The woman who was taken suddenly reappears two minutes later. She jumps and waves her arms in the air. She must think help is at hand - by this time, the Israeli Defence Forces had began [sic] their efforts to repel the incursion. But seconds later, she slumps to the floor as bullets bounce around her. We don’t know if she survived.”

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/israe ... -oct-media
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Jan 14, 2024 6:36 pm

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 13
January 14, 2024
Rybar

Image

In the Gaza Strip, the IDF operation continues as usual. In the northern part of the enclave, from time to time there are exchanges of fire between Israeli patrols and scattered groups of militants.

IDF advances are recorded in the area of ​​Deir al-Balah and al-Maghazi . Israeli armor has advanced southwest along the Salah al-Din highway , and Palestinians are attempting to attack IDF armored vehicles and firing mortars.

In the south there is heavy fighting in Khan Yunis , but the front line is hidden by the "fog of war". This is facilitated by IDF strikes that destroy communications equipment along with employees of telecommunications organizations.

In addition, Netanyahu actually announced an operation to establish control over the Philadelphia Corridor - the border between Egypt and the Gaza Strip. The total number of casualties in the enclave rose to almost 24 thousand dead and over 60 thousand wounded.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

Image
In the north of the Gaza Strip, the IDF carries out airstrikes, the Palestinians claim that civilians have been injured. At the same time, amid news about problems with the Internet, the flow of news from the north of the sector has practically dried up. In addition, representatives of Kataib Izz al-Din al-Qassam announced missile launches into Israeli territory north of the Gaza Strip. Missile warning systems went off in Netiv HaAsara , Erez and Yad Mordechai .

Center of the Gaza Strip

In the center of the sector, the IDF continues to launch multiple artillery and air strikes against various targets, moving along the Salah al-Din highway to the southwest. Between al-Maghazi and Deir al-Balah, the Palestinians entered into battle, but were unable to stop the mechanized IDF units.

Throughout the day, there were reports of gunfire in the area of ​​al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, and later video emerged of Palestinians fleeing towards the hospital past the Manfaluti Boys' High School.

In addition, the IDF press service reported on the destruction of launchers ready to fire in the Al-Mughraqi area, without specifying the method. The IDF may open a new offensive front in the central part of the sector from Wadi Gaza and Route 10 to Al-Mughraqa and Al-Zahra.

South Gaza Strip

Image
Since the morning, the media group Kataib Izz ad-Din al-Qassam has been reporting fierce fighting east of Khan Yunis , without specifying the area, as well as a successful ambush on IDF infantry.

Airstrikes continue, especially in the Kizan al-Najjar area . In Abasan al-Kabir, civilians were found dead after a UAV strike. However, no progress has been recorded yet.

At the same time, the Israeli media during the day, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the evening, actually announced the direction of one of the next stages of the operation. The IDF is going to take control of the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt , the so-called Philadelphia Corridor.

This will allow the IDF to control most, if not all, humanitarian aid traffic into the Gaza Strip, which, of course, will contribute to resolving the Palestinian issue in the region.

Border with Lebanon

The situation on the Israeli-Lebanese border is the same: mutual exchanges of blows continue. During the day, Hezbollah fighters reported five strikes against IDF positions at the Ruweisat al-Asi observation post , at the Birkat Risha and Khonin bases , near Biranit Barracks and At-Teihat Hill . According to the IDF press service, the shells fell in open areas. In addition, Shtula was fired upon using an anti-tank missile system : the rocket hit one of the buildings, during which it was damaged.

In turn, Israeli units again attacked the southern part of Lebanon: the air force carried out airstrikes in the areas of Mays al-Jabal , Yarin , Hula and Teir Harfa , and artillery crews shelled the settlements of Ad-Jibane , Kfar Qila , An-Nakura , Marwahin , Alma al-Shaab and others: according to preliminary data, material damage was caused to infrastructure facilities. There is no information about the casualties. Some settlements were also covered by tank fire.

West Bank

IDF raids against Hamas supporters continue in the West Bank . Arrests took place in Bethlehem , Nablus , Jerusalem , Qalqilya and Hebron : 15 Palestinians were arrested. The total number of detainees thus reached 5,835 people since October 7, 2023.

Violent clashes broke out at Al-Faraa camp in Tubas , where at least three Palestinians were injured. Israeli security forces broke into houses and placed snipers on the roofs of buildings. And members of local factions used IEDs and, according to reports, managed to hit an IDF bulldozer.

Hamas also released information about three Palestinians killed during clashes with Israeli troops during yesterday's infiltration attempt in the Jewish settlement of Adora, west of Hebron: they were Ismail Ahmed Abu Jahisha , Muhammad Arafat Abu Jahisha and Uday Ismail Abu Jahisha .

Late in the evening, a large IDF convoy entered Jenin, where several firefights broke out in different areas of the city.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

Pro-Iranian formations in Iraq launched a missile attack on the US base in Kharab al-Jir in Syria in the evening . As usual, there is no information about casualties or damage.

On the night of January 13, the United States launched a new attack on targets of the Yemeni Ansarallah movement. The airport in the Sanaa area was subjected to repeated strikes , where, according to CENTCOM, a Tomahawk missile from the destroyer USS Carney destroyed the radar. No deaths or injuries were reported.

Political-diplomatic background
About the situation around the Philadelphia Corridor

The Israeli media, and later Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, today actually announced one of the final goals of the operation in the Gaza Strip. According to the politician, Israel will not end the war without closing the Philadelphia Corridor .

Sami Abu Zuhri , the de facto head of Hamas, reacted to the statement . According to a representative of the movement, Netanyahu understands that he will not be able to achieve his goals in the Gaza Strip , and the Rafah border crossing is Egyptian-Palestinian and must maintain its status, especially since Israel already partially controls the movement of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Hamas asks Egypt to take a clear position and reject Israeli demands to take control of the Philadelphia Corridor, as this would mean a step toward population displacement.

If the operation does begin, Egypt will finally lose face in connection with the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the eyes of the Muslim world, since the Gaza Strip will be completely cut off from supplies of anything, and no tunnels will allow feeding more than two million people . Nothing will stop Israel from cutting off the supply of humanitarian aid, citing the possibility of it falling into the hands of Hamas. But for some reason no one is even trying to impose sanctions.

If the IDF makes the living conditions in the sector completely unbearable, and this is what everything is heading towards, then nothing will stop them from releasing the crowd, mad with hunger, into the territory of Egypt, and then come what may.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

Israel’s War on Palestine and the Global Upsurge Against It
Posted on January 13, 2024 by Yves Smith

Yves here. This Vijay Prashad article looks at the unprecedented show of outrage against Israel’s program of extermination in Palestine. Prashad connects the well-warranted disgust of people around the world to Israel’s lack of conscience and US dogged support to the question of legitimacy. It is becoming a little too obvious that brown lives do not matter to many former colonial powers.

By Vijay Prashad, an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of >LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and (with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of U.S. Power Produced by Globetrotter

Hundreds of millions of people across the world have been deeply moved by the atrocity of the Israeli war on Palestine. Millions have attended marches and protests, many of them participating in such demonstrations for the first time in their lives. Social media, in almost all the world’s languages, is saturated with memes and posts about this or that terrible action. Some people focus on the Israeli attack on Palestinian children, others on the illegal targeting of Gaza’s health infrastructure, and yet others point to the annihilation of at least four hundred families (more than ten people in each family killed). The focus of attention does not seem to be diminishing. Holidays in December went by, but the intensity of the protests and the posts remained steady. No attempt by social media companies to turn the algorithm against the Palestinians succeeded, no attempt to ban the protests—even the display of the Palestinian flag—worked. Accusations of antisemitism fell flat and demands for the condemnation of Hamas were dismissed. This is a new mood, a new kind of attitude toward the Palestinian struggle.


Never before in the 75 previous years has there been such sustained attention to the cause of the Palestinians and of Israeli brutality. Israel has launched eight bombing campaigns on Gaza since 2006. . And Israel has built up an entire illegal structure against the Palestinians in East Jerusalem and the West Bank (an apartheid wall, settlements, checkpoints). When Palestinians have tried to resist—whether through civic action or armed struggle—they have faced immense violence from the Israeli military. Ever since social media has been available, images from Palestine have circulated, including of the use of white phosphorus against civilians in Gaza, and including the arrest and murder of Palestinian children across the Occupied Palestine Territory. But none of the previous acts of violence evoked the kind of response from around the world as this violence that began in October 2023.

Genocide

The Israeli armed violence against Gaza since October has been in a qualitatively different form than any previous violence. The bombardment of Gaza was vicious, with Israeli aircraft hitting residential areas with no concern for civilian life. The number of dead increased day by day at a rate not seen before. Then, when Israeli ground forces entered Gaza, they effected an illegal mass eviction of the Palestinian civilians from their homes and pushed them further and further south toward the border with Egypt. The Israelis violated their own promises of “safe zones,” hitting areas more densely packed than before because of the internal displacement. It was this scale of violence that provoked an early use of the term “genocide” to describe what was happening in Gaza. By early January, more than 1 percent of the entire Palestinian population in Gaza had been killed, while over 95 percent had been displaced. The kind of violence used here was not seen in any contemporary war, neither in Iraq (where the U.S. disregarded most laws of war) nor in Ukraine (where the death toll of civilians is far smaller despite the war now lasting two years).

The momentum of mass protest pushed the government of South Africa to file a dispute in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Israel for the crime of genocide. Both countries are parties to the 1948 Convention Against Genocide, and the ICJ is the venue for dispute settlements. The 84-page filing by the South African government documents many of the atrocities perpetrated by Israel, and also, crucially, the words of Israeli high officials. Nine pages of this text (pp. 59 to 67) list the Israeli officials in their own words, many of them calling for a “Second Nakba” or a “Gaza Nakba,” a use of the term “Nakba” or Catastrophe that refers to the 1948 Nakba of the Palestinians from their homes that led to the creation of the State of Israel. These words are chilling, and they have been widely circulated since October. Racist language about “monsters,” “animals,” and the “jungle” shape the speeches and statements by these Israeli government officials. Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said on October 9, 2023, that his forces are “imposing a complete siege on Gaza. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel. Everything is closed. We are fighting human animals, and we are acting accordingly.” This, along with the character of the Israeli military strikes, is sufficient as a benchmark for the accusation of genocide. At the hearing at the ICJ, Israel was unable to respond credibly to the South African complaint.

It is a combination of the images from Gaza and the words of these Israeli high officials—backed fully by the United States government and many of the governments of European states—that provoked the sustained anger and desolation that has driven these mass protests.

Legitimacy

Over the course of the past two years—from the start of the war in Ukraine until now—there has been a rapid decline in the legitimacy of the West, notably the countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), led by the United States. These wars are not the cause of this drop in legitimacy, but they have accelerated the decline in the legitimacy of the NATO countries, particularly in the Global South.

Since the start of the Third Great Depression in 2007, the Global North has slowly lost its control over the world economy, over technology and science, and over raw materials. Billionaires in the Global North deepened their “tax strike” and withdrew a large share of social wealth into tax havens and into unproductive financial investments. This left the Global North with few instruments to maintain economic power, including by making investments in the Global South. That role was slowly taken up by China, which has been recycling global profits into infrastructural projects across the world. Rather than contest China’s Belt and Road Initiative, for instance, through its own commercial and economic project, the Global North has sought to militarize its response with massive spending (three-quarters of global military spending is by the NATO states). The Global North has used Ukraine and Taiwan as levers to provoke Russia and China into military conflicts so as to ‘weaken’ them rather than contest growing Russian energy power and Chinese industrial and technological power through trade and development.

It is clear to the majority of people in the world that it is the Global North that has failed to address the crises in the world, whether the climate crisis or the consequences of the Third Great Depression. It has tried to substitute a language of euphemism for reality, using terms such as “democracy promotion,” “sustainable development,” “humanitarian pause,” and—from UK Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron and Germany’s Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock—the ridiculous formulation of a “sustainable ceasefire.” Empty words are no substitute for real actions. To speak of a “sustainable ceasefire” while arming Israel or to speak of “democracy promotion” while backing anti-democratic governments now defines the hypocrisy of the Global North’s political class.

The Israelis say that they will continue this genocidal war for as long as it takes. As each day goes by of this war, the legitimacy of Israel deteriorates. But behind that violence itself is the much deeper end of the legitimacy of the NATO project, whose sanctimonies sound like nails being dragged across a bloodied chalkboard.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01 ... st-it.html

******

Deflect and deny: Israel responds to South Africa’s accusation of genocide at ICJ

On January 12, Israel responded to the allegations of genocide raised by South Africa at the ICJ. The court will now decide if it will grant Pretoria’s request for urgent measures, including a halt on Israeli military operations in Gaza.

January 12, 2024 by Tanupriya Singh

Image
Israel's legal team at the ICJ. Photo: International Court of Justice

The second day of the hearing on South Africa’s case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza took place at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on January 12. Over the course of three hours, Israel presented its response to the arguments made by Pretoria’s legal team the day prior.

Friday’s hearings were held on the 98th day of Israel’s relentless bombardment of besieged Gaza. In the 24 hour period between the hearings at the ICJ, Israel had killed approximately 151 Palestinians. The death toll since October now stands at over 23,700, with 60,000 people wounded, as per latest figures released by the Palestinian Ministry of Health on Friday.

On January 11, South Africa had presented in exhaustive detail the genocidal acts being committed by Israel in Gaza, including the mass killings of Palestinians and the infliction of “serious mental and bodily harm”. Arguments by lawyers Adila Hassim and Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh had described in detail the forced displacement and drastic humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza, including the “immediate risk of deaths by starvation, dehydration and disease”.

In its arguments on Friday, Israel refused to respond to the substance and evidence presented in South Africa’s case. Rather, in his opening address, Tal Becker, the legal advisor to the Israeli foreign ministry stated that South Africa had put forth a “distorted factual and legal picture”, and that it had tried to “weaponize the term genocide against Israel”.

Hamas responsible for Israel committing genocide?
While South Africa’s application placed the ongoing war in Gaza in the crucial historical context of the Nakba, occupation, apartheid, and siege, Becker asserted that Israel was engaged in “a war it did not start”, defending itself against Palestinian groups including Hamas. Israel’s lead counsel, Malcolm Shaw, would later repeat this argument, that the “true context” of the case lay in the attack of October 7.

On Thursday, the Israeli foreign ministry stated that South Africa was the “legal arm of Hamas”. In his address, Becker once again alleged South Africa’s “close ties” with Hamas, calling on the ICJ to impose provisional measures on Pretoria, and calling the application “libel” “designed to deny Israel the right to defend itself”.

This right of self-defense, which the ICJ in 2004 had declared Israel was not entitled to in a territory it was occupying, was repeated throughout Friday’s hearing. Instead of providing an answer to the specific allegations raised under the Genocide Convention, Israel repeatedly invoked its supposed adherence to international humanitarian law during armed conflict.

Becker made another central argument that has been repeated by Israel in the preceding months— that Hamas had “systematically and unlawfully embedded its military operations, militants, and assets throughout Gaza within and beneath densely populated civilian areas”.

He spoke of underground tunnels, with “thousands of access points and terrorist hubs located in homes, mosques, UN facilities, schools, and perhaps most shockingly, hospitals”, calling it an “extensive” and “pre-planned method of warfare”, using “civilians, sensitive sites, and civilian objects as shields”, an argument which is then extended to present Israel’s attacks on residential buildings, schools, and hospitals as “legitimate military targets”.

Becker was followed by Israel’s lead counsel, British lawyer Malcolm Shaw, who spent the substantial part of his arguments describing procedural and technical issues in South Africa’s application to the court, that Pretoria did not give Israel a “reasonable opportunity to engage with it on the matter” before raising the “dispute”, as defined under Article 9 of the Genocide Convention, to the ICJ.

Statements by Israeli authorities as “random assertions”
South Africa’s application, and arguments on Thursday, described in detail the intent to commit genocide in Gaza. “Israel’s special genocidal intent is rooted in the belief that in fact the enemy is not just the military wing of Hamas or indeed Hamas generally, but is embedded in the fabric of Palestinian life in Gaza,” Tembeka Ngcukaitobi had said on Thursday.

“The statements were made by persons in command of the state, they communicated state policy. it is simple— if the statements were not intended they would not have been made,” he had added, showing the court videos of Israeli soldiers dancing and chanting that “there are no uninvolved in Gaza” and repeating the invocations of Amalek made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

However, for Shaw, “there is little beyond random assertions that Israel has, or has had, the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the Palestinian people”. The argument sought to deflect and isolate the carefully documented genocidal statements as “certain comments made by some Israeli politicians” and “random quotes”.

Shaw was dismissive of the fact that these statements had been made by the senior most political and military leadership, including Defense Minister Yoav Gallant who had likened Palestinians to “human animals” and stated “we will eliminate everything”.

Civilian harm “unintended but lawful”
It is also important to note that it was only on January 9, just two days before the hearings at the ICJ that Israel’s attorney general released a statement saying that “calls for, among other things, intentional harm to uninvolved civilians…may constitute criminal offenses including incitement”. The very next day, the deputy speaker of the Israeli Knesset, Nissim Vaturi declared that he stood behind his previous statement to “burn Gaza down”, adding that “there are no innocents there”.

Meanwhile, on Friday, Shaw then spoke of Israel’s attempts to “mitigate civilian harm”, including warnings, telephone calls, and leafleting and “facilitation of humanitarian assistance”.

While citing government documents on “solutions” to “ensure the required supply of water, food, and medicine” and “increasing the amounts of trucks entering, with necessary inspections”, Israel’s arguments unsurprisingly did not explain how it was able to exert this extent of control over what was going in and out of Gaza in the first place.

Shaw was followed by Galit Raguan, the acting director of the Israeli justice ministry’s international justice division, similarly placed the blame of the killings in Gaza on Hamas, stating that “urban warfare will always result in civilian harm” and that they “may be the unintended but lawful result of attacks on military targets”.

Raguan continued to claim that Hamas had used hospitals for military purposes, even going on to falsely claim that Israel had not bombed hospitals and that damage and harm occurred due to “hostilities” in the “vicinity” and “always as a direct result of Hamas’ abhorrent method of warfare”.

She spoke of Israel’s “civilian harm mitigation unit”, and safe travel routes for civilians— the very routes Israel has bombed and attacked— and “localized pauses” for people to move, as well as advanced warnings through leaflets, broadcast messages, “warning calls” and even an X account to provide information for specific evacuation areas. Nevermind the fact that this was supposedly intended for a population that has been subjected to repeated telecommunications and internet blackouts. One such blackout was reported on Friday as well.

Total blockade
The Israeli team also spoke of the Israeli Army Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) and its cooperation with international organizations as part of Israel’s humanitarian efforts.

On October 9, the head of COGAT, Major General Ghassan Alian had stated, “Human animals are dealt with accordingly. Israel has imposed a total blockade on Gaza, no electricity, no water, just damage. You wanted hell, you will get hell.” The statement is included in South Africa’s submission to the ICJ.

Moreover, even though Israel’s legal team was trying its best to assert that it was doing everything possible to “minimize civilian harm” while Hamas was trying to “maximize it”, Israel’s lies were debunked almost in real time as the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs issued its Flash Update on Friday.

“Between 1 and 11 January, only 21 per cent (5 of 24) of planned aid deliveries of food, medicines, water, and other lifesaving supplies to the north of Wadi Gaza proceeded. Humanitarian partners were forced to cancel or delay missions in two instances due to excessive delays at Israeli checkpoints or because the agreed routes were unpassable.”

UN OCHA added,“Multiple planned missions (between 7 and 10 January) to deliver urgent medical supplies to the Central Drug Store in Gaza city, as well as planned missions to deliver fuel to water and sanitation facilities in Gaza city and the north, were denied by the Israeli authorities,” the update noted, while Israel’s lawyer, Omri Sender had told the ICJ that there were no restrictions on water.

If the supply of food, medical supplies and other humanitarian assistance is truly as unimpeded as Israel claims, how is it that the entire population of Gaza, or 2.3 million Palestinian people, is suffering from “crisis or worse levels of food insecurity”?

In calling on the ICJ to reject South Africa’s request for provisional measures, Israel has relied on its supposed facilitation of humanitarian aid as evidence that it does not have genocidal intent, alongside its argument that its actions are in fact self-defense.

While presenting her arguments on South Africa’s behalf on Thursday, senior counsel Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh had specifically stated that “any scaling up by Israel of access to humanitarian relief to Gaza, in response to these proceeding or otherwise, would be no answer to South Africa’s request for provisional measures”.

Citing previous cases where the Court had found risks of “irreparable harm” would persist in spite of unilateral assurances to remove restrictions on medicines, food stuffs and other essential humanitarian goods, Ghrálaigh had argued that “Israel continues to deny that it is responsible for the humanitarian crisis it has created, even as Gaza starves”.

She had emphasized that risks would remain despite unilateral moves on Israel’s part given its “past and current conduct towards the Palestinian people, including the 16 years of brutal siege on Gaza”. Ghrálaigh pointed out how shortly after Israel had opened the Kerem Shalom crossing in late December, it was struck in a drone attack.

“Nowhere and nobody is safe,” she stressed.

Next steps for ICJ case
The 15 judges of the ICJ along with the ad-hoc judges that Israel and South Africa have each nominated will now deliberate upon South Africa’s request for provisional measures, with an interim ruling expected in the coming weeks. A final verdict on the broader case brought by South Africa could extend for years. The ICJ’s decisions are legally binding.

Meanwhile, Germany issued a statement in support of Israel on Friday, stating that the accusation of genocide “had no basis whatsoever”. Government spokesperson Steffen Hebestreit added that Germany would officially intervene in the main case at the ICJ as a Third Party.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/01/12/ ... de-at-icj/

Gaza’s heath workers and aid agencies face impossible choices

Health workers are at grave risk while trying to provide care to the tens of thousands who are injured due to Israel’s brutal attacks. Both they and aid agencies are also faced with extremely tough choices on how to distribute the scarce medical supplies that are remaining

January 13, 2024 by Ana Vračar

Image
Children were injured as a result of a targeting in the Nuseirat camp in the central Gaza Strip (Photo: Al Awda Health and Community Association)

Triage is the term that most accurately summarizes what is happening to health services in Gaza. Every hour, health workers have to determine who among the dozens of patients lying on the hospital floors should be treated first. Doctors and nurses also have to decide who gets paracetamol or ibuprofen for procedures that would usually be performed while patients are under anesthesia, and who goes without even that.

There is also a third form of triage going on in the proximity of Gaza these days, and that one falls upon the people trying to get supplies into the Strip. Despite reassurances that they would allow aid to be distributed more easily, Israeli authorities are still obstructing deliveries. Knowing that only a fraction of what is needed will eventually be allowed in, international and humanitarian organizations are choosing—very, very carefully—what they will load on to their trucks.

It’s a difficult choice, explained Michael Ryan, Executive Director of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Health Emergencies Program, during the organization’s beginning-of-the-year press conference. “Do you replace a truck of food with a truck of lab supplies? Which truck has more priority?“

Read: 2023 was deadliest year for Palestinians in the West Bank since 2005
There is no good answer to Ryan’s question. Almost everyone in Gaza is facing food insecurity. All children below the age of 5—335,000 of them—are hungry and facing a lifetime of struggle with the consequences of stunting. Due to the food shortage, more than half of pregnant and breastfeeding women only have access to limited types of food, which impacts theirs and children’s health, according to a testimony by Rohan Talbot from Medical Aid for Palestinians, heard by the International Development Committee of the British Parliament.

On the other hand, the lack of medical supplies, combined with relentless bombardments, has brought about the total collapse of the public health system in Gaza. For decades, the Central Public Health Laboratory in Gaza ensured high-quality public health services. Located north of the Wadi Gaza line, the laboratory is no longer functional. The lack of laboratory capacities means that it is only possible to evaluate the spread of infectious diseases from what is obvious at first glance. There is no way to confirm what are the specific causes leading to e.g. respiratory problems

“We don’t have the means to verify why specific communicable diseases are appearing. We don’t have a way to see what particular pathogen is causing them,” said Teresa Zakaria from WHO’s Health Emergency Program. Because of that, it is impossible to know which measures should be put in place to mitigate the increase in morbidity.

Even if the WHO were able to pinpoint which measures are needed right now, it is extremely unlikely they would be permitted to implement them. Like all other organizations trying to maintain a lifeline to Gaza, the UN’s health agency is not really allowed in. “We have the supplies, the teams, and the plans in place. What we don’t have is access,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

The WHO had planned 7 missions into Gaza since December 26, but was forced to cancel all of them as Israel failed to provide security guarantees. It’s not just the WHO’s experience. Of the 21 missions that various UN bodies had planned in January 2024 alone, 16 were canceled because of the lack of cooperation by the Israeli occupation, reported Richard Peeperkorn, head of the WHO’s office for the occupied Palestinian territories.

Meanwhile, the Israeli army continues to target hospitals and other medical infrastructure in Gaza. Four members of the Palestine Red Crescent Society staff were killed on January 10 when Israeli Occupying Forces (IOF) hit their vehicle. Days before, the 5-year-old daughter of a staff member of Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) died from the consequences of an IOF attack on the shelter where MSF workers and their families were seeking refuge.

Those who are still alive share the faith of their patients. Ghada Al Jadba, UNRWA health officer, stressed to the UK International Development Committee that health workers are themselves displaced, having no safe space to sleep or water to drink. Tents, said Al Jadba, are a luxury. She also said that people were increasingly feeling dehumanized and alienated as a result of Israel’s attacks and, presumably, the unwillingness of the international community to act to stop the genocide immediately.

For those on the ground, safeguarding the remnants of the health system in Gaza is looking more and more like “mission impossible,” as Al Jadba put it.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/01/13/ ... e-choices/

******

How Israeli forces trapped and killed ravers at the Nova Festival

New evidence points to Israeli security forces, not Hamas, for causing the most fatalities at the music festival - civilian deaths that were then utilized to justify Tel Aviv's Gaza genocide.


William Van Wagenen

JAN 12, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Israeli officials allege that Hamas carried out a pre-mediated and carefully executed massacre of 364 Israeli civilians at the Nova music festival near Gaza on 7 October as part of the Palestinian resistance's Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. They claim that Hamas and other Palestinians had hours to murder Israeli partygoers before the army reached the scene.

However, new details have emerged showing that Israel's Border Police was deployed at the Nova site before Hamas stumbled on the festival, causing the eruption of a major battle.

While some ravers were indeed killed by the Palestinian resistance - whether by intent or in the chaos of battle - the evidence now suggests that the majority of civilian deaths were likely inflicted by Israeli forces themselves.

This was due to the overwhelming firepower employed by occupation forces - including from Apache attack helicopters - and because Tel Aviv issued the controversial Hannibal Directive to prevent Hamas from taking Israeli party-goers as captives.

Operation Philistine Horseman

At 6:30 am, just after sunrise on 7 October, fighters from the Hamas military wing, the Qassam Brigades, launched its military operation, firing a barrage of missiles toward Israel. Thousands of its fighters and those from other factions breached the Gaza border fence in multiple locations to attack surrounding Israeli military bases and take captives in settlements as leverage for a mass prisoner swap deal.

Though it would take the army hours to respond, units of the Border Police were quickly deployed. At 6:42 am, a mere 12 minutes after Operation Al-Aqsa Flood was launched, the Southern District Commander of the Israeli Police, Amir Cohen, gave an order code-named “Philistine Horseman,” sending police officers and Border Police who were on alert to the sites of various battles.

This included members of the Yamam, and Tequila commando units that have no police duties but conduct military and counter-terrorism operations, including undercover assassinations in the Gaza Strip and occupied-West Bank.

According to a senior Israeli officer speaking with by the New York Times, the first formal reinforcements to southern Israel came from commandos that arrived by helicopter.

Sagi Abitbol, a policeman working as a security guard at the festival, was among the first to confront Hamas fighters near Nova, and witnessed the early arrival of these helicopters.

During the fighting, 59 Israeli police officers were killed, including at least 17 at the Nova festival.

Hamas did not plan to attack the festival

Avi Mayer of the Jerusalem Post asserted that Hamas carefully planned to attack the concert in advance, intending to murder as many Israeli civilians as possible. The facts, though, tell an entirely different story.

An Israeli police investigation reported by Haaretz indicates that Hamas was unaware of the festival in advance. The official findings suggest that the intended target was Re’im, a settlement and military base located just down the road - on Route 232 - from the Nova site.

A major fight did indeed take place at Re’im, home to the Israeli army's Gaza Division, the Palestinian resistance's stated military target. The commander of the base was forced to call in airstrikes from an Apache helicopter on the base itself just to repel the Hamas attack.

The police investigation also indicates that Hamas fighters reached the festival site from Route 232, rather than from the Gaza border fence, further supporting the claim that the festival was not a planned target.

Following the launch of missiles from Gaza - and before Palestinian resistance fighters arrived on the scene - the organizers of the festival promptly ceased the music and initiated an evacuation.

According to a senior police officer quoted by Haaretz, roughly 4,400 people were present at Nova and the “vast majority managed to escape following a decision to disperse the event that was made four minutes after the rocket barrage,” while the first shots were not heard for another half hour.

Trapping civilians: Israel police blocked the vital 232 Road exit

However, as people exited the festival site by car and moved onto Route 232, Israeli police established roadblocks in both directions, leading to a traffic jam that trapped many partygoers in the area where fighting between Hamas and the Border Police would eventually break out.

“There was a lot of confusion. The police barricaded the road, so we couldn’t go near Be’eri. We couldn’t go near Re’im, the two near kibbutzim,” says one witness, Yarin Levin, who was trying to evacuate the area with his friends.

Levin, a former Israeli soldier, said this is when they had their “first encounter of the terrorists… fighting against the police that are there… two terrorists got lost in some kind of gun fight, so they found us.”

Another witness, Shye Weinstein, also confirms the Israeli police roadblocks that blocked the main exit from the festival. He took photos of a Border Police vehicle and a heavily armed policeman in combat gear impeding the road in front of his car.

A cell phone video from a concert attendee shows Israeli police and security forces using their vehicles to block the road near the festival site and exchanging fire with Hamas fighters.

When gunfire erupted, those trapped on the road fled east into open fields, whether in their cars or by foot. Many made it past the fields and hid near trees, under bushes, and in ravines.

But body cam footage shows heavily armed Israeli police units taking up positions on the road and firing across the open field into the trees where civilians had taken cover.

Image
Photos of destroyed cars near the Nova music festival

As Nova attendee Gilad Karplus, also a former Israeli soldier, told the BBC:

"We pretty much knew they would probably block the road. I'm pretty sure a lot of people got killed on those roads...We drove into the field and tried to hide from them… afterwards we got a bit deeper into the fields and then they started firing sniper rifles on us from different places and also heavy artillery."

Though Karplus and other partygoers were being fired on by the Border Police, they couldn’t make sense of this, and initially believed the shooting was from Hamas fighters disguised as police or soldiers. In other words, these witnesses actually saw Israeli forces firing on them.

For Hamas to have executed a plan involving elaborate disguises, the Nova operation would have had to be pre-planned, and the Israeli police investigation has already ruled that Hamas was unaware of the festival in advance. Moreover, no other site of clashes on 7 October reported sightings of Palestinian fighters donning Israeli uniforms - neither at the various breached settlements, nor at the Israeli military bases they entered.

Friendly fire

In short, both the Border Police and Apache attack helicopters were deployed to the festival site immediately. According to Israeli Air Force (reserve) Colonel Nof Erez, the helicopters were in the air by 7:15 am - 45 minutes after the launch of Al-Aqsa Flood - with a significantly larger number deployed throughout southern Israel within a few hours.

A survivor of the festival, Noa Kalash described hearing gunfire from both Hamas and Israeli forces, as well as airstrikes from attack helicopters and warplanes, while hiding in the bushes for hours to stay alive.



“We hear guns all over the place and people shooting and we can already recognize if its terrorists shooting or if it’s the army. Or it is an airplane, or a helicopter or rockets,” Kalash recalled.

It is abundantly clear that helicopter fire killed some of the terrified concertgoers. Haaretz quotes a police source saying that Apache helicopters “fired at the terrorists and apparently also hit some of the revelers who were there.”

Multiple eyewitnesses who visited the Nova site after the battle ended described the horrific destruction. As another news report states:

“It’s impossible to describe the scenes there in words. You can only list the sights that go on for a kilometer. There are hundreds of burned and bullet-riddled cars, huge wet bloodstains buzzing with flies and emitting a sickening odor, bags with body parts collected by the ZAKA [rescue] organization, thousands of bullets and casings and shrapnel of every kind.”

A Times of Israel journalist who visited the site days later recounted that, “dozens of cars were parked in rows, some of them burnt husks containing charred bodies of young festival-goers who were shot and burned alive.”

Saving bullets for soldiers

Incredibly, Israeli officials claim it was Hamas fighters who destroyed hundreds of cars at Nova, burning their passengers alive. But Hamas did not have this kind of firepower.

The group's fighters were armed only with light machine guns and RPGs, and their ammunition was limited to what they could bring with them in pick-up trucks from Gaza.

Guardian journalist Owen Jones noted this while discussing a 43-minute compilation of video footage from 7 October shown to select journalists by the Israeli army. He says Hamas fighters “urge bullets to be saved for killing soldiers. One terrified reveler in a car is asked, ‘Are you a soldier?’”

As Jones notes: “So there is clearly some distinction being made between civilians and soldiers in the footage selected by Israel of the thousands of hours of footage which we don’t see.”

While Hamas’ ammunition was limited, the Border Police were heavily armed and Apache helicopters are equipped with Hellfire missiles and 30 mm automatic chain guns, which can hold up to 1,200 rounds of ammunition and fire 625 rounds a minute.

This suggests Israeli forces caused most of the death and destruction at Nova - which could be confirmed If Israel were to release all of its video footage from 7 October.

The Hannibal Directive

Israeli forces had not only the fire power, but also an official order to kill Israelis at Nova.

A major reason Hamas launched the Al-Aqsa Flood operation was to take Israeli captives that could be exchanged for the thousands of Palestinians held captive in Israeli prisons. But Israeli forces were determined to prevent Hamas from taking captives back to Gaza, even if this meant killing the captured civilians.

An investigation of Israel's long-controversial Hannibal Directive concludes that “from the point of view of the army, a dead soldier is better than a captive soldier who himself suffers and forces the state to release thousands of captives in order to obtain his release.”

But, on 7 October, according to a Yedioth Ahronoth investigation, the Hannibal Directive - which has previously only applied to army captives - was issued against Israeli civilians as well. The Hebrew-language daily writes that "at noon on October 7, the IDF [Israeli army] ordered all of its combat units in practice to use the ‘Hannibal Procedure’ although without clearly mentioning this explicitly by name.”

The order was to stop “at all costs any attempt by Hamas terrorists to return to Gaza, that is, despite the fear that some of them have abductees,” the investigation concludes.

In the days and weeks after the incident, Israeli authorities made a great show of distributing images of vehicles destroyed at the festival site, fully implying that the cars - and the dead victims inside - had been burned to a crisp by Palestinian fighters. The Yediot report completely upends that claim:

“In the week after the attack, soldiers of elite units checked about 70 vehicles that were left in the area between the settlements and the Gaza Strip. These are vehicles that did not reach Gaza, because on the way they were shot by a combat helicopter, an anti-tank missile or a tank, and at least in some cases everyone in the vehicle was killed,” including Israeli captives.

Nof Erez, the Israeli Air Force colonel noted above, similarly concluded, in regard to Israel's indiscriminate use of helicopter firepower that day, that “The Hannibal directive was probably deployed because once you detect a hostage situation, this is Hannibal.”

An apparent instance of this at the Nova festival was inadvertently documented by the BBC, which reported that video footage showed a woman who was taken hostage, but who:

“Suddenly reappears two minutes later. She jumps and waves her arms in the air. She must think help is at hand - by this time, the Israeli Defence Forces had began their efforts to repel the incursion. But seconds later she slumps to the floor as bullets bounce around her. We don't know if she survived.”

The rationale for the Hannibal Directive was further explained by Brigadier General Barak Hiram, who ordered a tank to open fire on a home to resolve a hostage situation in Kibbutz Be’eri, “even at the cost of civilian casualties.” The strike killed 12 Israelis, including 12-year-old Liel Hetzroni, and dozens of Hamas fighters.

“I am very afraid that if we return to Sarona [Israeli military headquarters in Tel Aviv] and try to hold all kinds of negotiations [to free hostages], we may fall into a trap that will tie our hands and not allow us to do what is required, which is to go in, manipulate, and kill them [Hamas]...”

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/how-i ... a-festival
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Jan 15, 2024 12:58 pm

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 14
January 15, 2024
Rybar

Image

The Israeli army continues to operate in the Gaza Strip , carrying out numerous artillery and air strikes. In the north, there are skirmishes with migrating militant groups, and in the central part there are battles for the Al-Breij camp . There are also violent clashes in Khan Yunis .

The situation on the border with Lebanon has worsened significantly . The IDF, in response to the deaths of civilians, launched several airstrikes at great operational depth, and there was a partial loss of electricity in the Jebel Safi area . The press service of the Israeli army announced a strike on Hezbollah headquarters .

The situation in the West Bank has not changed significantly. The IDF is carrying out mass arrests, and there were shootouts in Jenin in the morning and evening. By evening, the situation escalated as several minors were killed as a result of Israeli actions. Mass demonstrations are expected tomorrow.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

The IDF carried out airstrikes in the Sheikh Ajlin and Tal al-Hawa areas west of central Gaza, as well as Beit Lahia . In addition, Palestinian media reported sounds of heavy fighting from Highway 10 , and unnamed southern areas of Gaza came under artillery fire. In addition, on the night of January 14, the Palestinians announced the destruction of a Hermes 900 reconnaissance UAV using MANPADS , later posting a not very informative video of the launch.

However, the Palestinians still retain the ability to launch various missiles at nearby Israeli territories. The groups reported launches of M-75 missiles at Ashdod , where several interceptions were recorded, and some of the ammunition fell on a vacant lot. In addition, warning sirens sounded in the settlements of Saad and Zimrat .

Center of the Gaza Strip

IDF artillery and air force are carrying out multiple strikes on Palestinian-controlled areas in the central part of the Gaza Strip. The fighting is taking place mainly in the Al-Breij area , but there are also fragmentary reports of the IDF invading the Al-Maghazi camp . There is no information about the IDF's progress.

South Gaza Strip

Image
Since the morning, Arab media reported heavy fighting in the areas of Jurat al-Lot and al-Batna al-Samin , but without details. Palestinian groups have reported a number of attacks on IDF positions.

"Kataib Izz ad-Din al-Qassam" announced the defeat of armored vehicles. And “Saraiya al-Quds” and “Kataib Shuhada al-Aqsa” fired mortars at Israeli military locations near the College of Science and Technology and the Al-Shuhada Mosque . In turn, the IDF bombed the outskirts of Khan Yunis and Rafah from the very morning .

Border with Lebanon

Mutual shelling continues on the Israeli-Lebanese border. During the day, Hezbollah fighters reported attacks on IDF positions near Ruweisat al-Asi and Hadab Yaron , at the Birkat Risha base , Khirbet Maar and at the Al-Marj facility . Kafr Yuwal was attacked with the use of anti-tank systems : IDF soldier Barak Ayalon and his mother were killed. In addition, members of the Lebanese group claimed that a helicopter was shot down in the Marwakhin area , but there is no evidence of this.

Today, the so-called Islamic Glorious Brigades have taken responsibility for the operation in northern Israel. The group’s fighters crossed the border of the two countries in the area of ​​Mount Dov and came across an Israeli patrol: a firefight ensued, during which three members of the “brigades” were killed, and the rest successfully retreated. The number of IDF soldiers killed is unknown. The operation is said to have been carried out in response to the death of Hamas military wing commander Saleh al-Arouri , who was killed by an Israeli UAV in Beirut .

In turn, the Israel Defense Forces launched further attacks on the southern part of Lebanon. Israeli troops, using artillery and aviation, intensively bombed the mountainous areas of Jebel Safi , Ar-Rihan , Iklim al-Tuffa and Akamat , as well as the settlements of Ad-Jibane , Jebel Blat , Yarin , Mays al-Jabal , Aytarun and others: material damage was caused damage; no casualties were reported. They also flew to the city of Siddiqin , which was bombed for the first time since 2006.

West Bank

The Israel Defense Forces' operations against Hamas supporters continue in the West Bank. The arrests took place in the vicinity of Bethlehem , Ramallah , Jerusalem , Qalqilya and Nablus : several people were detained, including two sisters of a senior Hamas military wing commander, Saleh al-Arouri , who was killed by an Israeli drone in Lebanon. In Hebron , a clash killed one Palestinian and wounded another.

The most violent clashes between Israeli security forces and members of Palestinian groups took place in Jenin : militants reported blowing up IDF military equipment using IEDs. At least two Palestinians were wounded in gunfire between the two sides. The British Foreign Office spoke out about what was happening in the region , expressing concern about the increase in violence and calling on Israel to protect civilians.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

Pro-Iranian proxies in Iraq have become significantly more active. US bases at the Al-Omar field , the Green Village facility , the Conoco plant , as well as Kharab al-Jair in Syria were hit by missiles and UAVs . In Iraq, explosions were heard near Erbil airport .

There is conflicting information coming from Yemen about US and British strikes on Jebel Dada in the province of Al-Lahiya , which, at the same time, members of the coalition refute. The activity of reconnaissance aircraft flights is also recorded.

Political-diplomatic background
Statements by Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi

Speaking at the International Conference on the Al-Aqsa Flood in Tehran , Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a number of statements regarding what has happened since the start of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to him, the cause of the war in Gaza was not the actions of Hamas on October 7, 2023, but “injustice and occupation” that lasted 70 years. Raisi noted that all peace negotiations were useless, thanked the Yemeni Houthis for their support for the Palestinians and expressed confidence that the end of the “Zionist entity” is inevitable.


Rallies in Tel Aviv

In Tel Aviv, regular mass demonstrations took place under slogans demanding the resignation of Benjamin Netanyahu's government , immediate elections and the resumption of negotiations with Hamas. The protest is timed to coincide with the 100-day anniversary of the capture of Israeli citizens: over 100 hostages are still being held captive by the Palestinian group.

More than 120,000 people took to the streets : this was also motivated by Netanyahu’s words that “no one will stop Israel from achieving victory.” Among the demonstrators was one of the opposition leaders Benny Gantz . Israeli police used force: arrests were made and posters depicting the faces of the hostages were confiscated.


Pro-Palestinian demonstrations in various countries

There were also pro-Palestinian protests. Thus, in Washington , people demanded a ceasefire in Gaza and US government support for Israel. Demonstrators attempted to break into the White House . They damaged the barriers and threw pieces of meat over them, which symbolized the dead Palestinians. Members of President Joe Biden's team were hastily evacuated.

On the occasion of "International Gaza Day", similar demonstrations took place in London , Paris , Stuttgart , Vienna , Naples and other major European cities: tens of thousands of people took part in them. And more than half a million people gathered in the British capital , causing the government to deploy 1,700 police officers.

About the attack on a Palestinian demonstration in Scotland

In Edinburgh, Scotland , during a massive pro-Palestinian demonstration attended by several thousand people, the driver of a black SEAT León drove into a crowd of protesters. Several people escaped with minor injuries without hospitalization or medical care.

The culprit was identified as a 70-year-old elderly woman. The police soon arrested her and charged her with traffic violations. The motives for this action on the part of the old woman are still unknown. Given her age, it is likely that the attack on the protesters was carried out unconsciously.

About statements by the Hamas political bureau

The Politburo of the Palestinian Hamas movement has issued a number of statements regarding the actions of the Israel Defense Forces in the Gaza Strip and the ongoing proceedings in the Netherlands' Hague . Thus, it criticized the attack by Israeli troops on the technical group of the Palestinian Telecommunications Company, during which two of its employees were killed. The group called on the international community not to show restraint in the issue of trial of Israel.

In addition, a member of the movement's Politburo, Hossam Badran, reacted to the detention by Israeli security forces of two sisters of the commander of the military wing of Hamas, Saleh al-Arouri . He said the arrests in the West Bank were a "failed attempt to avenge the resilience of our people in Gaza." And another representative of the political office, Izzat al-Rishk, condemned Germany’s intention to act as a third party at the International Court, calling on Berlin to refuse support for Tel Aviv .

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

‘US intimidation will not stop us’: Hassan Nasrallah

The resistance leader said that ending Hezbollah's operations against Israel can only be discussed when the war on Gaza ends

News Desk

JAN 14, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

Secretary-General of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, vowed during his speech on 14 January that no amount of US pressure or “intimidation” will stop the Lebanese resistance from continuing its daily operations against Israel.

“The Americans threatened Lebanon, saying that if the southern front was not de-escalated, Israel would wage a war against the country … Your intimidation will not work, neither today, nor tomorrow, nor any day,” Nasrallah said.

He added that the Israeli army has been defeated in Gaza and that this “decimated” military is “welcome” to try launching a war on Lebanon.

“The Israeli army, when it was in good shape and fully equipped, was destroyed in the face of our resistors during the July War of 2006 … Israel and its settlers are the ones who should fear war, not Lebanon,” he went on to say.

“We have been ready for war for 99 days, and we are not afraid of it. We will fight without limit [if war is imposed on us].”

Nasrallah confirmed once again that the Lebanese front was opened “to support Gaza and stop the aggression against it ... and when the aggression stops, then [closing the front] can be discussed.”

“The Americans, who claim to be concerned for Lebanon, must fear and be concerned for their tool (Israel) … in the region.”

Prior to Nasrallah’s speech on Sunday, eight operations were carried out by Hezbollah against Israeli military sites on the Lebanese border.

The resistance leader also condemned during his speech the recent US-UK assault on Yemen, which came as a response to the Red Sea attacks on Israeli-linked shipping and vessels bound for Israel, carried out by the Ansarallah resistance movement and Yemeni Armed Forces.

Several were killed in the US-British attack on Yemen on 12 January.

The US followed up with more strikes on Yemen on 13 January, targeting the vicinity of Sanaa International Airport – which has been under a Saudi-led blockade for nine years.

"If Biden and those with him think that by aggression against Yemen, they can prevent the Yemenis from continuing their operations [in support of Gaza], then they are ignorant,” Nasrallah said.

“The American aggression is what will harm the security of maritime navigation in the Red Sea, which will turn into a battlefield … this is stupidity in itself,” he added.

Yemeni operations have not killed or injured anyone. They aim to target Israeli-linked ships or vessels bound for Israeli ports in order to prevent goods from reaching Israel while the people of Gaza are blocked from receiving aid.

Yemen’s Armed Forces have vowed that all other ships are free to navigate as they please, and have expressed willingness to cease their attacks if the war on Gaza is ended and if sufficient aid reaches the Palestinians.

Nasrallah also praised the Iraqi resistance’s recent attack on Israel, as well as its ongoing operations against US bases in Iraq and Syria.

With regard to the Gaza Strip and the ongoing battles there, Nasrallah confirmed that Israel is “drowning in failure,” praising the fierce resistance put up by the Qassam Brigades and other groups in Khan Yunis, as well as elsewhere in Gaza.

He added that Israel has not achieved any of the goals it set out to achieve upon launching the war on Gaza, “neither the publicly stated goals nor the hidden goals.”

“The Israelis have become assured that their government is incompetent and must be changed … This is an admission of failure in itself … If the current path [of resistance] continues in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq, the enemy government will accept the conditions of resistance,” Nasrallah asserted.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/us-in ... -nasrallah

Israel looking to seize control of Gaza-Egypt border

An Israeli operation to capture the Salah al-Din Axis (Philadelphi Corridor) would deepen the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where starvation already stalks one in four inhabitants of the besieged enclave

News Desk

JAN 14, 2024

Image
Palestinians with foreign nationalities await the opening of Rafah crossing (Photo credit: AP)
Israeli officials are reportedly planning a risky military operation to take control of the Gaza side of the Egyptian border, a strip of land known as the Salah al-Din Axis or Philadelphi Corridor, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on 14 October.

According to current and former Israeli officials and Egyptian officials speaking with the WSJ, the operation would allow Israel to take control of a key crossing point, the Rafah Border Crossing, which has long been Palestinians' only route to the outside world amid Israel's crushing multi-decade blockade.

"There is no chance we will allow this crossing to operate as it did before," said Michael Milshtein, a former head of the Department for Palestinian Affairs in Israeli military intelligence.

Tel Aviv wants to station Israeli forces all along the 14 km stretch of land from the Gaza-Israel-Egypt border in the southeast to the Mediterranean Sea in the southwest of the besieged enclave.

This would allow Israel to block smuggling through underground tunnels from Egypt's Sinai. The Palestinian resistance uses these tunnels to bring weapons into Gaza, while Palestinians use them to bring items for everyday needs.

Several Israeli officials have made public their ambitions to occupy the Philadelphi Route. During a press conference on 30 December last year, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the "Philadelphi Corridor – or, to put it more correctly, the southern stoppage point – must be in our hands. It must be shut.”

Two days earlier, former defense minister Avigdor Lieberman posted on X that the corridor must be destroyed.

The WSJ said Israeli leaders have yet to green-light the operation but have notified Egyptian authorities of the plan and are coordinating with them.

An Egyptian source denied this, telling Al-Arabi Al-Jadeed that "There is no truth to what the media reported regarding coordination with Israel related to new security measures in the Salah al-Din axis."

The Egyptian news outlet Al-Qahera News quoted an Egyptian official who said such reports were “completely false.”

Such a military operation to occupy a stretch of land just a few hundred yards wide would require Israeli forces to push through Rafah city, which straddles the border. This would be devastating for Palestinian civilians who have been forced by Israeli bombing in north and central Gaza to flee south to Rafah city and adjacent areas where makeshift tent camps have been established.

Israel has repeatedly demanded Palestinians leave their homes in various parts of Gaza, only to bomb the places it told them would be safe to flee to.

The bombing has caused Gaza's health system to all but collapse, and almost half of the Strip's residents lack water and are at risk of starvation as Israel has tightened its siege since 7 October.

After Hamas carried out Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant ordered "a complete siege on the Gaza Strip," saying, "There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed."

According to the UN, one in four people in Gaza are starving, and nine out of ten families in some areas spend a day and night without food.

Israeli officials have repeatedly stated their desire not only to defeat Hamas' Qassam Brigades but also to force Gaza's 2.3 million people to flee to Egypt or other countries as refugees. They hope to annex Gaza and build settlements for Israeli Jews to live atop destroyed Palestinian homes.

Israeli settler groups and Knesset members recently held a conference to discuss building Jewish settlements in Gaza once its indigenous inhabitants have been ethnically cleansed.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/israe ... ypt-border

*******

Israel and the U.S. Are Already Feeling the Weight of Houthi Justice

Hugo Dionísio

January 14, 2024

For better or worse, the Houthis are the only political and military force doing anything practical to demand that Israel pay for its acts.

For better or worse, the Houthis are the only political and military force doing anything practical to demand that Israel pay for its acts. And despite the attack on their territory, we can already say with certainty, that the Ansar Allah movement and the pro-Palestinian resistance, in general, will be strengthened by this event.

Were it not for a rebel movement, made up of poor people living in great hardship, no other country in the region would do anything to bring some moral justice, however little, to this whole process. As they say, whoever has a lot, has the most to lose. Only the poor give what they need and this is a good example of that.

It is even curious that here and there, apart from a few diplomatic and commercial measures, the most serious diplomatic action for Israel has come from outside the continent and the Middle East: South Africa’s accusation at the International Court of Justice that the state of Israel should be tried for genocide. Of course, the accusation was immediately branded with the very vulgar epithet of “anti-Semitic”.

But the Houthis’ role in the Red Sea has produced absolutely unpredictable and — perhaps unexpected — results for the West. The Red Sea trade route accounts for 12% of global maritime trade and 12% of all oil trade. An important part of the commercial ships that travel between the Indian Ocean and Europe pass through the Red Sea.

Moreover, the importance of this route for Israel is truly decisive. The Port of Eilat essentially lives off this sea route. Disconnecting the port of Eilat from the international routes to Asia not only means that many of the goods that Israel receives from Asia will become more expensive and risk perishing, with all the economic burdens that this entails. But it also means cutting tourism, since the city of Eilat is an important tourist destination in the Middle East, and losing the competitiveness of its exports to the Asian continent.

But in the end, the financial damage might even be surmountable. What would be difficult to overcome would be the fragility in which an effective blockade of the Red Sea crossing would leave Israel.

Let’s imagine a likely scenario in which the war fronts multiply and the conflict spreads to other regions (Lebanon, Syria and Yemen). Just as Oman has closed its airspace to military planes to bomb Yemen, a country like Egypt could, in a situation of great pressure and popular pressure, consider closing the Suez Canal to boats that are linked to Israel. It wouldn’t be unheard of, as we know. Oman itself has prevented U.S. military aircraft from passing through, for various reasons. One of them has to do with a certain neutrality that the sultanate is assuming on the international stage. However, this “neutrality” is also due to the ethnic tensions it has in its territory, which borders Yemen. In any case, leaving the port of Eilat open only to boats coming from the Suez Canal would be strategically fragile.

So, while it cannot be denied that the Houthi naval blockade may be a burden for the other Arab nations that receive their ships at Red Sea ports, the fact is that for none of them the situation is as dramatic as it is for Israel. Since the goods that Israel receives by sea and from Asia can come from the Red Sea without having to go through the Suez Canal, the port of Eilat is absolutely strategic for the country’s economic stability. And without economic stability, wars can’t be won. Even against those who arm themselves with little more than stones and sticks and a few handmade rockets.

In this sense, and in the face of the danger, it didn’t take long for the U.S. to try to defend its spearhead in the Middle East, trying to organize an international coalition that they called the “Operation Prosperity Guardian”.

The attempt to mask this initiative as something intended to defend the world and the global economy will not have had the intended propaganda effects. The fact is that, as has been widely reported, many nations did not want to join in — some directly, others directly and indirectly. If, on the one hand, this was a call from the U.S., on the other, at the time, the primacy established by the Houthi for the blockade still resonated in minds: only Israeli ships or those in any way linked to that country’s interests are affected.

The refusal of some may have been due to the fear of being associated with defending the interests of the state of Israel, whose image on the international stage was increasingly linked to the bombing of civilians, the bulldozing of cities, the deportation and displacement of entire families from their homes and the summary execution of human beings.

With effort, the U.S. managed to get its team together. We couldn’t have expected anything other than what happened on January 12th, namely the attack on Yemen and in particular on the Houthi forces.

The event was widely reported in the corporate media as if it were a real victory. An attack, by world powers, one of them one of the biggest military powers on the planet, perpetrated against a depleted people, scarred by hunger and war, is sung about as a historic victory.

But the truth is that the Houthi had already won. We all remember the messages from Blinken or Biden during their frequent visits to the Zionist state: we can’t let the conflict spread to the Middle East, they said. Well, although this attack avoids the worst, which is to ensure that Israel doesn’t get involved on several fronts, so that it can carry out its plan for Gaza with impunity and calmly, the fact is that, at the moment, a new front of conflict has just been opened, which adds to the other fires that the U.S. already has in hand, and it is not yet clear how it will end.

The unpredictability of this conflict doesn’t stop there. No matter how much propaganda Uncle Sam can buy, everyone has already realized that the U.S. and its vassals will go to any lengths to defend Israel, even when it finds itself in an absolutely marginal situation in the face of international law and compliance with the most basic human rights.

With all this, the Houthi have not only managed to make Israel pay a price — still very low — for its campaign against Gaza and for the apartheid it maintains over the Palestinian people, but they have also managed to show the world that for the U.S., when it comes to democracy, human rights, crimes against humanity and war crimes, the scales always tip in favor of its hegemonic interests. What they demand and punish some for, they excuse and reward others for.

We can now only hope that The Hague tribunal does its job and avoids being instrumentalized by hegemonic interests, as happened at the International Criminal Court with Putin, Milosevic and many other Africans and Asians, for whom that court is nothing more than a tentacle of the empire. Let’s hope that some justice is done.

For the time being, the Houthi have already given us something, demanding a higher price from Israel for their actions, unmasking the nature of American support for Zionism and showing the world, once again, that Western nations arrogate to themselves the right to attack wherever and whenever they want, without any backing in international law, without the mantle of the UN, without even having been provoked. Since it was Israel that was provoked.

At least we can see their faces!

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... i-justice/

******

Netanyahu Vows to Defy International Court of Justice as Israel Moves to Tighten Control Over Southern Gaza Border
Posted on January 15, 2024 by Yves Smith
The Financial Times reports that Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu has said he will defy any restrictions, aka provisional measures, that might be imposed on Israel by the International Court of Justice in the case lodged by South Africa. As we and many others have pointed out, the ICJ has no enforcement powers, so a ruling against Israel would appear to have no immediate effect unless the UN or other states or international bodies were to impose concrete measures to try to constrain or punish Israel. Admittedly, some states do have provisions that restrict dealing with groups found to have engaged in genocide or other war crimes. From the Financial Times:

Speaking at a press conference on Saturday evening, Israel’s prime minister defiantly brushed aside calls for a ceasefire and blasted South Africa’s allegations that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, brought at The Hague-based International Court of Justice.

“Nobody will stop us — not The Hague, not the [Iranian-led] axis of evil and not anybody else,” Netanyahu said.

“The hypocritical onslaught at The Hague against the state of the Jews that arose from the ashes of the Holocaust . . . is a moral low point in the history of nations,” he added.


If you have any doubts about Israel’s sense of impunity, slaughter of Palestinian civilians continues:
Ramy Abdu| رامي عبده
@RamAbdu
Breaking: Starvation has reached unprecedented levels... Thousands in western Gaza city rushed out upon hearing of a food truck's arrival, only to be fired upon by the Israeli army. #GazaGenocide

[youtube]http://twitter.com/i/status/1746555582880866331[/youtube]

10:31 AM · Jan 14, 2024 1.6M Views
As well as the US enablement:
Alex Press
@alexnpress
·
Follow
Palestinians aren’t even mentioned once in this statement from Biden
Image
whitehouse.gov
Statement from President Joe Biden Marking 100 Days of Captivity for Hostages in Gaza | The White...
Today, we mark a devastating and tragic milestone—100 days of captivity for the more than 100 innocent people, including as many as 6 Americans, who are still held being hostage by Hamas in Ga
The pink paper also describes how Netanyahu is not only staring down international low and world opinion but also domestic opposition. Public demands for a ceasefire to secure the release of roughly 130 Israeli hostages are getting louder. Yet the government insists, against evidence, that only continued prosecution of its campaign will lead to the hostages being freed. First, as we know, the active fighting has wound down as Israel has pulled most of its ground forces out of Gaza. Second, pray tell how will an onslaught against Hamas, particularly if in or by damaging the tunnels, not risk hostage death and injury?

However, the Wall Street Journal describes how Israel plans an increase in military operations in Gaza, to secure an area on the south border with Egypt that it claims Hamas uses to smuggle in weapons and supplies. From the Journal:

Israeli officials have informed Egypt that they are planning a military operation along the Gaza side of the border, current and former Israeli officials and Egyptian officials said. The operation would likely involve removing Palestinian officials from a key crossing point and stationing Israeli forces along a stretch of land from Gaza’s southeastern corner abutting both Israel and Egypt toward the Mediterranean Sea about 8 miles to the northwest, the officials said.

For Israel, reclaiming the border region would strike a strategic blow against Hamas. It would allow Israel to block Hamas’s tunnels in the area, limit its flow of weapons, prevent its militants from escaping the Gaza Strip and remove any control the group has over the crossing point.

Image

For Palestinians, it would roll back a symbol of Palestinian sovereignty. It could also open the door to Israel maintaining longer-term control over the border after the war, altering a security arrangement with Gaza that has existed for nearly two decades….

Egypt is concerned that an Israeli operation could infringe on the terms of a 1979 peace treaty between the two countries, which places limits on the number of troops both nations can place near the borders in the area. An Israeli military operation also risks accidentally doing damage inside Egyptian territory. Israeli officials say they are working to address those concerns by coordinating their plans for an incursion on the Gaza side with Egypt.

gypt in recent days rejected an Israeli proposal that would involve stationing Israeli security personnel on the Egyptian side of the border for joint patrols with Egypt, saying it would breach Egyptian sovereignty….

Israeli leaders haven’t given a final go-ahead for an operation along the border and the timing of any operation will depend on negotiations with the Egyptian government…

Egypt says its military and intelligence services maintain tight control over the border area. Using diplomatic and security channels, Egypt has been pushing back on Israel’s plans in hopes that Israel will back down, Egyptian officials said.

The article contains a lot more backstory, such as how in 2005, when Israel pulled out of Gaza, it kept control of the airspace, the sea border, and all entry points except at Rafah. However, the fact that Israel stopped aid trucks from entering at Rafah would suggest it has at least some control there. The Palestinian Authority and EU monitors were initially in charge. They left when Hamas took power, although Israel coordinated with Egypt to curb entry.

Those who know the situation in Gaza better than I do should feel free to correct me. I find it odd that Israel is turning, apparently only now, to the matter of the Rafah entry and southern border only now. Even yours truly who knew close to bupkis about Gaza knew that Hamas depended significantly on its tunnels into Egypt for supplies. So why, pray tell, did Israel focus on flattening northern Gaza first, trying to force the population into souther Gaza, and now decide it has to better secure the border to interdict supplies to Hamas? Why did it not instead bomb the southern border area first, and try to move Palestinians out of there so it could work on capturing the border from the Gaza side and attack the tunnels there so as to choke Hamas’ necessities?

The timing raises the specter that this is military theater to bolster the Israel claims in the International Court of Justice that it is waging war against Hamas, as opposed to seeking to eliminate Palestinians in Gaza. by (finally) launching a Hamas-focused operation. Even though Netanyahu professes to be unconcerned about the ICJ, he would be at the head of the line in any International Criminal Court prosecution. Perhaps a few in the Israeli adminisphere are looking to create some plausible deniability. Or perhaps this is to demonstrate to the Israeli public that Israel is still Doing Something about Hamas despite the troop withdrawals in Gaza. Or perhaps this move is to even better, erm, control humanitarian supplies. From Al Jazeera:

The lack of aid entering Gaza through Rafah and other border crossings has been solely caused by Israel, according to Diaa Rashwan, the chairman of Egypt’s State Information Service (SIS).

“Throughout these 100 days, has been the stubbornness and intentionality of the occupying Israeli authorities, at other Gaza Strip crossings, delaying the inspection of aid before allowing its passage to the Palestinian side, by virtue of its military control over the territory of the Gaza Strip,” he was quoted as saying in an SIS post on Facebook.

Rashwan added that the Rafah crossing hadn’t been closed “for a single moment” on the Egyptian side, while Israeli authorities deliberately disrupted or delayed the entry of aid “under the pretext of inspecting it”.

So Israel is as determined as ever to continue on its current course.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01 ... order.html

*******

Image

Turns Out “Israel Has A Right To Defend Itself” Meant “Israel Has A Right To Commit Genocide”

Turns out “Israel has a right to defend itself” actually meant “Israel has a right to commit genocide, and no other countries have a right to stop it.”

Caitlin Johnstone
January 15, 2024


Axios has a ridiculous new article out citing multiple anonymous US officials titled “Biden ‘running out’ of patience with Bibi as Gaza war hits 100 days”. The Biden administration keeps leaking to the press trying to put separation between their guy and the genocide in Gaza, and they are so fulla shit. Biden has had the ability to end this mass atrocity since day one. The slaughter continues because Biden wants it to. He owns this.



Netanyahu delivered a speech commemorating 100 days of Israel’s war on babies and journalists and hospitals and residential buildings saying “We will restore security to both the south and the north. Nobody will stop us — not The Hague, not the axis of evil and not anybody else.”

If I was standing on the right side of history, I don’t think the side I was standing with would be saying that not even The Hague can stop them from killing everyone they want to kill.



Turns out “Israel has a right to defend itself” actually meant “Israel has a right to commit genocide, and no other countries have a right to stop it.”






We’ve been seeing reports of Israeli sniper drones shooting and killing people in Gaza, which is probably a good time to note that Gaza has long been a live laboratory for the military industrial complex. Data is with absolute certainty being collected on all the newer weapons being field-tested on human bodies there — just like has been happening in Ukraine and in Africa — and that data will be used for the benefit of the war machine and the arms industry.



It’s so dopey how Israel apologists will yell at you if you criticize Israeli criminality without mentioning Hamas and October 7. Literally everyone knows about Hamas and October 7. Literally everyone acknowledges that Hamas attacked Israelis out of hostility to the state of Israel. Everyone, including Hamas and its most enthusiastic supporters, fully acknowledge that this happened.

Meanwhile Israel and its supporters have adamantly denied the reality of what’s been happening in Gaza since October 7. The western press have been wildly biased in favor of Israel and have been guilty of mountains of journalistic malpractice with their pathetic coverage of the ongoing Gaza massacre. The majority of westerners are still ignorant of the extent to which Israel had been abusing and killing Palestinians prior to October 7.

It is therefore necessary to talk about these things to spread awareness and counteract the propaganda and distortion, and it is not necessary to continually mention Hamas and October 7 while doing so. Literally everyone acknowledges the occurrence of the October 7 attack, while a vast percentage of the population is either uninformed or actively lying about the occurrence of all Israeli crimes from the Nakba on. Only one of these two things requires more emphasis.






Israel demanding that everyone condemn the Hamas attack is like a bunch of thugs punching a man in the face over and over and then demanding that everyone condemn him for hurting their hands. The Hamas attack was the natural result of Israel’s abuses upon the Palestinian people.



In the mind of the empire simp, the violence of the empire’s enemies always comes completely out of nowhere, without provocation and for no reason. Ansarallah started attacking ships in the Red Sea because they’re pirates who hate freedom of navigation. Hamas attacked Israel because they’re evil and hate Jews. Putin invaded Ukraine because he’s evil and hates democracy. Grown adults portray the enemies of the empire the same way the children’s cartoon show Captain Planet portrayed its villains, cackling evilly about how they’re going to dump toxic waste into the ocean for no reason other than to hurt the environment.



I’ve honestly never gotten used to being called an anti-semite, even after three months of getting it nonstop. It has never stopped being shocking to me that someone would accuse me of harboring the same prejudices which gave rise to the Holocaust in response to my criticisms of horrific mass atrocities backed by the most powerful empire the world has ever seen. It’s just absolutely deranged, despicable behavior, and I am consistently shocked to see grown adults behaving that way in public without the slightest hint of shame.






Someone asked me if I have any advice for dealing with the anxiety which comes with discovering that the western empire is the most murderous and tyrannical power structure on earth, and that we’ve been lied to about this our entire lives.

The painful emotions which come up when we discover an uncomfortable truth aren’t problems which need to be dealt with, they’re feelings which need to be felt. Let the grief, anguish, rage, shame, fear, or whatever it might be say everything it needs to say to you, in the same way you’d let a beloved child tell you about their feelings and concerns. You wouldn’t push the child away or treat them like a problem, you’d hear them out and give them a cuddle and let them know you care about them and that you’ll keep them safe. Once you’ve consciously felt a feeling all the way through and heard out everything it needs to say to you, its energy will dissipate.

Uncomfortable truths and uncomfortable feelings need to be met in the same way: head-on, with an open mind and an open heart. Moving into a truth-based relationship with life means wanting to see everything: uncomfortable truths about the world, uncomfortable truths about ourselves, and uncomfortable feelings we haven’t been allowing full expression to. It can be painful at times, even downright terrifying, but it’s also the only path to health for both our species as a collective and ourselves as individuals.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/01 ... -genocide/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14816
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Jan 16, 2024 12:34 pm

What is happening in Palestine and Israel: chronicle for January 15
January 15, 2024
Rybar

Image

In the north of the enclave, the Israeli Air Force continues to bomb residential areas in several areas of Gaza . Meanwhile, in the center and south of the enclave, IDF units are trying to advance, but due to the already four-day lack of communications and the Internet, it is still difficult to establish the configuration of the front.

At the same time, the Israeli command announced the withdrawal of the 36th division and two more armored brigades from the territory of the enclave. Against this background, rumors have already appeared on the Internet that in the near future these forces may be transferred to the northern border of Israel to fight Hezbollah .

In the West Bank, Israeli security forces carried out a series of large-scale raids: police operations took place in more than ten settlements in the region, in total at least 70 people were detained. During the clashes with local militants, there were deaths and injuries.

And not far from Tel Aviv , a terrorist attack occurred in the city of Raanana : two Palestinians from Hebron took possession of cars and ran over residents in different areas of the city . As a result of the incident , one person was killed and 17 residents were injured, including children. At the same time, Hamas stated that what happened in Ra'anana was a guerrilla operation.

Progress of hostilities
North Gaza Strip

Image
Israeli aircraft continue to massively bomb residential areas in the northern part of the Gaza Strip: according to the latest data, over the past night more than 30 residents were killed and several dozen were injured. Meanwhile, Palestinian media said that 70 thousand housing units in the enclave were completely destroyed, and 290 thousand were in disrepair - approximately 70% of the northern part of the Gaza Strip is uninhabitable. This is also evidenced by footage of the destruction of housing stock, which, despite the almost complete lack of communication and Internet in the region, continues to regularly appear on the Internet.


Despite the temporary suspension of the operation in Gaza, the Israeli Air Force has continued to carry out massive attacks on various areas of the city in recent days. There are also occasional exchanges of fire between Hamas militants and Israelis. This indicates that some of the Israel Defense Forces units were withdrawn due, among other things, to the inability to promptly clear urban areas. Therefore, the Israeli command at the current stage decided to focus on military operations in the central and southern parts of the enclave.

Center of the Gaza Strip

Image
Israeli troops continue to launch air and artillery strikes on populated areas in the region. At the same time, the IDF is fighting in the area of ​​Al - Breij and Nuseirat , where, judging by regular reports of shelling, militants continue to remain. The Israelis are also trying to advance to Deir al - Balakh , but at the current stage an assault on the city is unlikely. Apparently, Israeli troops intend to advance to the Ar - Rashid highway in order to then form several pockets in the region. After which the populated areas will be methodically cleared.

South Gaza Strip

Image
In the south, no significant changes have been recorded: fighting continues in the areas of Jurat al - Lot and Botn al - Samin . At the same time, the main goal of the IDF in this area is to break through to the Nasser hospital - it is perceived by the Israelis as one of the main Hamas bases. In fact, the Ash - Shifa hospital was previously represented in the Israeli command in the same way . At the same time, over the past few days, the Israeli Air Force has carried out strikes several times on targets in the Nasser Hospital area. It is likely that the IDF has already begun preparing the area for combat operations in the area of ​​the medical facility.

Israel Center

In Israel, a terrorist attack occurred in the city of Raanana , located 19 km north of Tel Aviv: one person was killed, 17 residents were injured, four of them are in serious condition. The terrorist attack was carried out by two Palestinians from Hebron - they took possession of two cars and ran over people in different areas of the city. The attackers were detained and interrogated. Both, according to police, were in Israel illegally. At the same time, Hamas stated that what happened in Ra'anana was a guerrilla operation carried out in response to Israeli aggression in the Gaza Strip.

Border with Lebanon

Image
Mutual shelling continues on Israel's northern border. Hezbollah reported attacks on military bases and strongholds of the Israel Defense Forces Birkat Risha , Matat , Al - Malikiya , Ramim and Al - Samaka . A series of explosions also occurred in the Israeli-controlled Shebba Farms area . In turn, Israeli troops also massively shelled populated areas in southern Lebanon: Ad - Dahira , Jebbane , Shikhin , Hanin , Hula , Marjayoun and Khiam were also under fire .

West Bank

Image
Last night, Israeli security forces carried out one of the largest raids in recent memory in more than ten settlements of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank.


The largest operation took place in Nablus , where for the first time since 1992, IDF units entered the campus of An-Najah University to detain students: according to the latest data, about 25 people were arrested on charges of links with Hamas.


Destroyed house in Qalqilya

And in Qalqilya , Israeli security forces destroyed two houses, conducted searches in the area of ​​one of the hospitals and detained more than ten Palestinians. There were also exchanges of fire with local terrorists, as a result of which one of the militants was wounded. During the day, Israeli raids continued: in the city of Dura , one person was killed and more than ten were wounded. In total, about 70 people were detained in the region during the day.

The large-scale raids were likely a response to yesterday's calls by radicals for a general protest after the Israelis killed several teenagers near Ramallah . The reason for their murder is not known for certain: Palestinian media report the shooting after the teenagers took part in a protest, while Israeli media report their attempt to attack an IDF military base.

However, the situation itself in the West Bank still remains under the complete control of the Israelis. All recent attempts by local activists to organize unrest in the region were either not supported by the population or were promptly suppressed by the security forces. And all the calls for a “new intifada” remained only in the online space. This is largely due to both the lack of unity in the ranks of local groups and the policies of the head of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas , who during the Israeli-Palestinian conflict proved his effectiveness in the role of the Israelis’ tame Gauleiter.

Aggravation in the Middle East

Image

Pro-Iranian proxies continue to show limited activity in Syria : today a missile strike was carried out on US positions in the area of ​​the Conoco plant . As before, the circumstances of the incident were not revealed online. It was also reported that a drone launched from Syria was intercepted over the Golan Heights .

The tense situation remains in the Red Sea, where the Houthis attempted to attack American ships twice during the day. During the night, an anti-ship missile was fired at the destroyer USS Laboon in the southern Red Sea. The ammunition was intercepted by one of the aircraft based at US air bases in the region. And already in the afternoon, the Houthis launched an anti-ship missile at the US-owned and operated container ship Gibraltar Eagle, sailing under the flag of the Marshall Islands . The US command noted that the ship did not report significant damage and continued on its route.

Political-diplomatic background
About the Israeli striker in the football championship in Turkey


A remarkable incident occurred yesterday in the Turkish championship during a football match between the Antalyaspor and Trabzonspor teams , in the 68th minute of which Israeli football player Sagiv Yehezkel , while celebrating a goal, decided to show a headband with the inscription “100 days. 7.10."

Immediately after the match, the management of Antalyaspor announced the termination of the contract with him for violating national values, after which the footballer was detained by Turkish law enforcement officers on charges of publicly inciting hostility and hatred. In Israel, the resonant decision to arrest the football player was criticized, and the country's Defense Minister Yoav Galant even called Turkey the executive body of Hamas. Nevertheless, during diplomatic negotiations, the parties managed to agree on the release of Yehezkel and his return to his homeland.

It is significant that this is not the first scandal with an Israeli football player against the backdrop of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: at the end of October, Yehezkel refused to go to the match against Gaziantep because of holding a minute of silence in memory of the Palestinians. However, no sanctions followed for this act.

However, what happened is not surprising. Similar cases arose with European championship players who, for example, published Hamas propaganda videos on their social networks. For this, by the way, the football player of the French “Nice” Youssef Atal was sentenced to eight months of suspended imprisonment, as well as a fine of 45 thousand euros.

As for Russian football players, for the most part they prefer to remain silent about their attitude to the special operation on the so-called. Ukraine. So far, the Russian football community can only boast of sending assistance to Russian military personnel, as well as the isolated example of ex-footballer of the national team Andrei Solomatin, who last summer went to the Northern Military District zone as a volunteer.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-pale ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

Gut Feelings Make for Strategic Errors – U.S. Lured Into Battlescape in Gaza, Yemen and Now Iraq

Alastair Crooke

January 15, 2024

China and Russia have been remarkably quiet, watching carefully the global tectonic plates shifting around in response to the ‘two wars’.

China and Russia have been remarkably quiet, watching carefully the global tectonic plates shifting around in response to the ‘two wars’ (Ukraine and Israel’s ‘multiwar’). Really it is not surprising; both states can sit back to simply watch Biden and his team persist with their strategic mistakes in Ukraine and in Israel’s multiple wars.

The interlacing of the two wars will, of course, shape the new era. There are substantive risks, but for now they can observe with comfort from afar as a climatic juncture in world politics unfolds, gradually raising the pace of the attrition to a circle of fire.

The point here is that Biden, at the centre of the storm, is no cool-headed Sun-Tzu. His politics are personal and highly visceral: As Noah Lanard has written in his forensic analysis of How Joe Biden Became America’s Top Hawk, his own team say it plainly: Biden’s politics is seated in his ‘kishkes’ – his guts.

That can be seen in the disdainful and graphic way in which Biden sneers at President Putin as an ‘autocrat’, and the way he talks about victims of the Hamas attack being massacred, sexually assaulted, and taken hostage, whilst “Palestinian suffering is left vague – if mentioned at all”. “I don’t really think he sees the Palestinians at all”, says Rashid Khalidi, Professor of Modern Arab Studies at Columbia University.

There is a long and reputable history of leaders making the right spur of the moment decision from their unconscious, without careful rational calculous. In the ancient world this was a highly prized quality. Odysseus exuded it. It was called mêtis. But this ability was contingent on having a dispassionate temperament and an ability to see things ‘in the round’; to grasp both sides to a coin, we would say.

But what happens if, as Professor Khalidi implies, the ‘kishkes’ are filled with anger and bile; instinctive sympathy for Israel, fuelled by an outdated view of the Israeli domestic scene. “He just does not seem to acknowledge the humanity of [others]”, as a former Team Biden member put it to Lanard.

Well, mistakes – strategic mistakes – become inevitable. And these mistakes are luring the U.S. in – deeper and deeper (as the Resistance foresaw). Michael Knights, a scholar at the neo-con Washington Institute think-tank noted:

“The Houthis are high on their successes and will not be easy to deter. They are having the time of their lives, standing up to a superpower who probably cannot deter them”.

This comes on the back of an Ukraine war already reaching – or at – its foregone conclusion. Both in the U.S. and amongst its allies in Europe, it is recognised that Russia has prevailed overwhelmingly, and across all ‘domains of conflict’. There is next to no chance that this situation can be recouped, irrespective of money or fresh western ‘support’.

The Ukrainian military taste the bitter fruits of this fact daily. Many in Kiev’s ruling classes ‘get it’ too, but are frightened to speak out. The cadre of hardliners behind Zelensky however insist to press on with their delusion of mounting a new offensive.

It would be a kindness to ‘those about to die’ in another futile mobilisation for the West to call a halt. The endgame is inevitable: An agreement to end the conflict on Russia’s terms.

Ahhh, but do not forget Biden’s ‘kishkes’: This outcome would mean Putin ‘winning’ and Biden’s hope of a victory garland turning to ashes. The war must be kept going, even if its only achievement be to fire long-range missiles directly into the civilian cities of Russia (a war crime).

It is obvious where this is going. Biden is in hole that only can deepen. Can’t he stop digging? Some in America may wish he would, as the Democratic electoral prospects dim. But it seems probable that he can’t, for then his nemesis (Putin) would ‘win’.

Of course, his nemesis has already won.

On Israel, Lanard continues:

“ … Biden often has traced his unyielding support for Israel … to “a long, long discussion” with Henry “Scoop” Jackson – a notoriously hawkish Senator (once described as ‘more Zionist than the Zionists’).

“After Biden became vice-president, he stuck with his ‘no daylight” belief’: (‘that peace will only come from there being “no daylight” between Israel and the U.S.’). In a memoir published last year, Netanyahu wrote that Biden made his willingness to help clear from early on: “You don’t have too many friends here, buddy,” Biden reportedly said. “I’m the one friend you do have. So call me when you need to”.

In 2010, when Netanyahu infuriated Obama with a major settlement expansion while Biden was in Israel; Peter Beinart reported that whilst Biden and team wanted to handle the dispute privately, the Obama camp took an entirely different route: Secretary Clinton gave Netanyahu 24 hours to respond, warning: “If you do not comply – it might have unprecedented consequences on the bilateral relations – of the kind never seen before.”

“Biden was soon in touch with a stunned Netanayhu … Biden completely undercut the Secretary of State [Clinton] and gave [Netanyahu] a strong indication that whatever was being planned in Washington was hotheadedness – and [that] he could defuse it when he got back”.

When Clinton saw the transcript, she “realized she’d been thrown under the bus” by Biden, one official said. Beinart concluded:

“that during a critical period early in the Obama administration, when the White House contemplated exerting real pressure on Netanyahu to keep the possibility of a Palestinian state alive, Biden did more than any other cabinet-level official to shield Netanyahu from that pressure”.

Clearly such accounts put Biden to being viscerally to the Right of some in Netanyahu’s War Cabinet – “We’re not going to do a damn thing other than protect Israel,” Biden said at a fundraiser this December; “Not a single thing”.

Such unwavering backing is a sure recipé for coming U.S. strategic errors – as Moscow, Tehran and Beijing will have surmised.

Former Israeli diplomat and current Washington insider, Alon Pinkas, considers that although an Israeli-Hizbullah war would be devastating for both sides, “why does it feel Inevitable?”

“Whilst Washington is wary of such a development … Israel seems resigned to the idea. So much so – that a Washington Post article quoted U.S. officials expressing “alarm”, and estimating that [Netanyahu] is encouraging escalation as a key to his political survival”.

Yet, what do Biden’s kishkes say to him? If an Israeli military operation to ‘move’ Hizbullah north of the Litani ‘feels’ inevitable to Pinkas; and with Israel ‘resigned to it’, would it not also be likely – given Biden’s unwavering backing for Israel – that Biden is somehow resigned to a war too?

What of the Washington Post report on Sunday that Biden has tasked his staff with preventing all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah?

That report – clearly purposefully leaked – was likely intended rather, to inoculate the U.S. from blame for complicity, should war in the North break out.

Was a quite different messaging being transmitted via Senator Lindsay Graham to Netanyahu at their meeting last Thursday – and to Mohamed Bin Salman (whom Graham met later at his desert tent) – just as in 2010, Biden was ‘on the quiet’ telling Netanyahu to ignore Obama’s messaging about the necessity for a Palestinian State?

(Senior U.S. figures are not wont to meet both with the Israeli PM and subsequently the Crown Prince without touching base with the White House command).

The key to understanding the complexity for launching military action in Lebanon lies with the need to view it from a wider perspective: From the perspective of the neo-cons, confronting Hizbullah invokes the pros and cons of a broader U.S. ‘war’ with Iran. Such a conflict would involve different and more explosive geopolitical and strategic aspects since both China and Russia are in strategic partnership with Iran.

U.S. Envoy Hochstein is in Beirut this week, and has been reportedly tasked with binding the Lebanese and Israeli sides to the provisions of the (never implemented) 2006 UNSC Resolution 1701.

The Lebanese government has proposed to the UN a road map for implementing 1701. The ‘map’ envisages finalising agreement on all thirteen disputed border points and proposes demarcating the boundary between Lebanon and Israel accordingly. But, as Pinkas points out, such a configuration of the issue is wholly misleading, for Resolution 1701 is not simply an unresolved territorial dispute in Lebanon. The major focus of Resolution 1701 was (and is) the disarmament and displacement of Hizbullah, yet the Lebanese government’s plan doesn’t mention Hezbollah at all, which poses clear questions about its realism and purpose.

Why would Hizbullah be persuaded to disarm, when Netanyahu, together with Defence Minister Gallant, have announced through a joint statement this weekend that “the war is not nearing its end: both in Gaza and on the northern borders” with Lebanon.

Gallant, last weekend, warned plainly enough that Israel will not tolerate the approximately 100,000 Israeli residents displaced from their homes in northern Israel and being prevented from returning home on account of Hizbullah’s threats. Should the Hochstein diplomatic solution not emerge (with Hizbullah disarmed and removed from the south), then Israel, Gallant promised, will take military action. “The hour glass will soon turn over”, he warned.

Perhaps the most daunting and ominous thing about an Israeli-Hezbollah military confrontation is its apparent inevitability, Pinkas concludes:

“The sense that it is a foregone conclusion. In the absence of a mutually agreed upon and durable political agreement, and given Hezbollah’s raison d’être and Iran’s regional motivations, such a war may be just a matter of time”.

So, when Blinken arrived in Israel, he unsurprisingly faced deep scepticism on the possibility of reaching an agreement with Lebanon for Hizbullah to withdraw to the far side of the Litani River, Israeli commentator Ben Caspit reports. (Well, certainly, if the subject has not been raised at all with Hizbullah!).

Were Israel to invade Lebanon in order to attempt to drive Hezbollah away from the border, it would, of course, be invading a sovereign UN member state. Irrespective of the circumstances, it immediately would be denounced internationally as an illegal aggression.

Is the point of these negotiations then, to try to get the Lebanese State to agree to a ‘stripped-down’ (Sheba’a farms ignored) accord that accepts 1701 in principle, so that Israel cannot be accused of invading a sovereign state?

Might this too be a tactic, acceded to by Hizbullah, to avoid blame in Lebanese circles for triggering a war that would damage the state, through placing the onus on Israel for launching an attack on Lebanon? Is this 1701 initiative no more than a charade with its eye on possible legal consequences?

If so, how does this affect any message Biden might be sending Israel on back channels? We know that one set of U.S. messages sent to Iran is that the U.S. does not want war with Iran. Is this setting the scene for Biden again to indicate that his own unwavering support for Israel remains intact? Almost certainly.

Russia, Iran and China and much of the world naturally are watching as the U.S. allows itself to be drawn into a series of overlapping strategic mistakes – one leading to another – that will undoubtedly reshape the global order to their advantage.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... -now-iraq/

******

US to send 1,500 troops to Syria and Iraq

Multiple factions in the region have been conducting operations in an attempt to kick US troops out of the region

News Desk

JAN 15, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: ABC News)
The US is set to send 1,500 soldiers to Syria and Iraq, ostensibly in order to join the fight against ISIS, CBS Philadelphia reports on 14 January.

The soldiers will be sent from the New Jersey Army National Guard in its largest deployment of soldiers to the area since 2008.

“We have the people we need. We have the training that we need. We have the equipment that we need to fight and win," Lt Colonel Omar Minott, who is among the 1,500 to be deployed, said.

The deployment of troops to Syria and Iraq falls under Operation Inherent Resolve, the US military campaign against the Islamic State across Iraq, Libya, and Syria, which calls for combating ISIS and defending US bases against resistance groups in the region.

The military operation caused a large number of US personnel deployments to the region this year.

Within the latter half of 2023, the US sent a wave of 2,500 soldiers to Syria and deployed over 900 soldiers to Iraq on two separate occasions. The deployment of these soldiers was to protect US interests against “Iran-affiliated forces.”

According to Axios, the US military presence in the region reached about 45,400 as of October 2023. The majority is in Kuwait, with 13,500; followed by Bahrain at 9,000; and Qatar at 8,000.

The US deployment into Syria and Iraq to combat ISIS raises questions. According to the US State Department, ISIS attacks in Syria have decreased by 68 percent and 80 percent in Iraq when comparing 2023 to 2022.

The Cradle’s Robert Inlakesh has said that this push by the US is to keep hold of its dominance in the region.

“To maintain the dominance of the collective west over the region, the immediate hurdle is overcoming the influences of Iran and Russia. This is why the occupation of roughly a third of Syrian territory by the US and its proxies, along with the imposition of deadly sanctions on Damascus, has become crucial in undermining the strength of its adversaries,” Inlakesh said.

Iranian and Russian forces in Syria have been coordinating with the specific aim of forcing Washington’s troops to eventually withdraw from the country.

Meanwhile, various Iraqi resistance forces have said they will continue to fight the US until they withdraw from their nation’s borders.

Kataib Hezbollah spokesman Abu Ali al-Askari has previously said that the group’s operations against the US occupation will continue until the last soldier is removed from Iraq.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/us-to ... a-and-iraq

Iraqi resistance strikes three US bases in Iraq, Syria

On the same night, US jets reportedly bombed positions belonging to allies of the Syrian army near the Deir Ezzor military airport

News Desk

JAN 15, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: X)

The Iraqi resistance announced attacks on three US bases on the evening of 14 January, two in Syria and one in Iraq.

“Using missiles and drones, the Mujahideen of the Islamic Resistance in Iraq attacked three occupation bases in Iraq and Syria: the Kharab al-Jir base, the US base at the Conoco oilfield, and the US base at Erbil airport,” Islamic Resistance in Iraq coalition announced in a statement on Sunday evening.

“The Islamic Resistance confirms that it will continue to destroy enemy strongholds,” the statement added.

A Sputnik correspondent reported that explosions were heard that evening near the Conoco base. This is the 24th attack on the Conoco base in the past two months, the correspondent said, adding that the area also witnessed “intense US Army helicopter and drone flights, with militants loyal to the US Army on high alert.”

According to Sputnik, US aircraft also targeted positions belonging to allies of the Syrian army near the Deir Ezzor military airport.

The Islamic Resistance in Iraq, a coalition of Iraqi resistance factions which banded together in October, have been striking US bases with drones and missiles in both Iraq and Syria. The attacks come in solidarity with the resistance in Gaza and in rejection of US support for the Israeli assault on the besieged Gaza Strip, but also aim to speed up a withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.

The Iraqi resistance has also struck a number of targets inside Israel.

Washington has responded with several violent airstrikes on both Iraq and Syria since the start of the war in October. These strikes have killed a number of fighters and commanders linked to the Iraqi resistance.

In the past three days, US jets also carried out two separate attacks on Yemen in response to continued naval operations against vessels linked to or bound for Israel. The first strike on Yemen took place on 12 January and was carried out jointly by Washington and the UK.

Sanaa’s forces have vowed to continue targeting Israeli shipping, despite the US attacks against it.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/iraqi ... iraq-syria

The West Bank is a ticking time bomb

With army-protected Jewish extremists running riot through Palestinian towns, and the deeply unpopular, US-backed PA barely holding on to its reins, the West Bank is primed for a seismic explosion that will transform into Israel's next war front.


The Cradle's Lebanon Correspondent

JAN 15, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Alongside the military assault on Gaza, extremist religious parties in Israel's government coalition seized a strategic opportunity after Operation Al-Aqsa Flood to launch a systematic displacement agenda in the occupied West Bank.

This stealthy policy was facilitated by several factors, notably, the escalation of settler violence post-7 October, increased political pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and the vise-like leverage that settler-extremists enjoy over Israel's ruling coalition and key governmental institutions, particularly the Ministry of Finance

As an example, nearly $250 million of the national budget earmarked for war expenses in December 2023 was directed by Israel's radical Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich toward settlement projects in the West Bank.

Immediately after its announcement, the EU criticized the settlement-funding provisions of the revised budget, rightly arguing that the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements and the forced displacement of Palestinians undermine security in the occupied West Bank, and will not make Israel safer.

The silent war on the West Bank

In response, Tel Aviv significantly tightened its grip on West Bank Palestinians. This involved obstructing Palestinian workers from employment in Israel and the finance minister’s refusal to transfer Palestinian clearance funds to the Palestinian Authority (PA) to pay Gaza's worker salaries.

On the military front, Israeli has launched a frenzied campaign on the West Bank since 7 October, resulting in the death of hundreds and arrest of over 6,000 Palestinians. Acts of violence, forced displacement of civilians, and armed settler attacks – enabled by weapon transfers from Israel's extremist National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir – escalated dramatically across the occupied territory.

Ben Gvir, who fronts the hidden agenda of nationalist and religious parties in the coalition government, used the Al-Aqsa Flood events to displace 25 Palestinian Bedouin communities, including 266 families in the eastern foothills near Ramallah and the Jordan Valley.

Already this year, under pressure from his extremist allies, Netanyahu has halted demolitions of illegal Jewish outposts in the West Bank, going against the recommendation of Defense Minister Yoav Galant who is trying to ease tensions in the West Bank while conflict rages on Israel's northern and southern fronts.

In early January, Smotrich and Ben Gvir publicly called for the displacement of Gazans to make way for the return of Zionist settlers to the Gaza Strip for the first time since their 2005 expulsion. Their belligerent comments sparked a new rift with the US administration of Joe Biden, which has sharply criticized “inflammatory and irresponsible” rhetoric from Tel Aviv.

Blinken’s mission in Ramallah

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s recent visit with Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas was not primarily focused on post-war discussions on Gaza, as Washington has widely suggested, but on curbing a West Bank conflagration.

The occupied Palestinian territory is today a ticking time bomb that could explode at any moment, over any incident, small or large, and which could jeopardize frantic US attempts to defuse and manage the military escalation on Lebanon's borders.

Blinken’s key objective was to exert pressure on the PA, which governs the West Bank, to prevent and quash any popular Palestinian uprising that could lead to the opening of a third war front against Tel Aviv.

Last week, Israeli security and military authorities intensified their warnings to cabinet members, urging Netanyahu to de-escalate tensions to avert a third intifada, which the Israeli army may struggle to contain while heavily distracted with Gaza, Lebanon, and the significant economic impact from Yemen’s shipping blockade.

US and Israel are not on the same page

The US is up against a highly-pressured timeline as it gears up for the upcoming presidential elections. Despite its efforts to find temporary, band-aid solutions for the regional unrest unleashed by Tel Aviv's war on Gaza, Washington finds itself increasingly entangled in a West Asian quagmire, courtesy of its recent airstrikes on Yemen.

What greatly bothers the White House is that its Israeli ally appears to be frustratingly unconcerned with this American dilemma, with Netanyahu far more focused on his personal political future and the radical agenda of his coalition partners — an agenda not aligned with overall US interests.

Despite persistent warnings about the volatile situation in the West Bank, the Israeli prime minister refuses to pressure his allies, fearful of their repeated threats to abandon his coalition government.

The US cannot afford a West Bank military escalation because of the major repercussions this may have on its post-war proposals for Gaza and on its domestic political scene. The PA, now deeply unpopular among its own Palestinian constituents, is also a crucial component of US projects in West Asia, many overlapping with various regional agendas.

Since the start of the current war, the US has sought to involve the PA in the post-war political rehabilitation of Gaza, in alignment with several Arab and western countries, as a preliminary step toward resuming negotiations for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine.

The path to a ‘just peace’ has become a key element in discussions between Washington and Riyadh, in which the latter insists on tangible Israeli steps toward a two-state solution before considering a full normalization with Tel Aviv.

While the ever-elusive, two-state option was initially a secondary consideration in normalization talks, Israel's brutal and unprecedented military assault on Gaza, in which over 22,000 mostly women and children have been killed, has now become a central component for Saudi Arabia.

Riyadh has its own motivations, both internal and external, and is firmly adhering to the two-state path. With growing discontent in the US over Biden's handling of the region’s crisis, the White House is in need of a diplomatic breakthrough in West Asia to secure some electoral gains. Recent polls, however, which will almost certainly be exacerbated by last week's unprovoked strikes on Yemen, continue to indicate US voter dissatisfaction (57 percent) with Biden's management of West Asian policy.

The PA’s uncertain future

To confuse matters further, the US-backed Israeli military establishment has different calculations than the Netanyahu-led government it serves. The military aims to demobilize reservists and shift to a less severe, more targeted level of aggression in Gaza, aligning with US advice, while simultaneously, preparations are being made for a potential Israeli escalation with Lebanon.

Much is unknown about the ongoing coordination between the Israeli military and the Pentagon – in terms of whether they are willing to undermine Tel Aviv's goals and tactics – other than their joint concern that Israel's right-wing government pursues personal interests over strategic considerations.

But avoiding a West Bank conflagration is a major concern for both, hence why this was a focal point of Blinken's visit with Abbas and his shuttle diplomacy with the Saudis. The threat of a West Bank escalation was also used as leverage by the US to wrest Palestinian clearance funds back from the Netanyahu government. Key to the White House efforts is securing the weak and ineffectual PA as its main Palestinian partner moving forward, and rebranding it as a safe alternative to Hamas and other resistance factions in Gaza.

Since 7 October, the PA has sought political cover by tightly aligning itself to the stances of Egypt and Jordan, who warn Israel and its allies against population displacements in Gaza and the West Bank. This has led to increased engagements between Ramallah, Cairo, and Amman, which suits Washington's agenda well.

None of these things, however, disguises the fact that an unpopular PA, riding on the shoulders of the now utterly despised American enablers of Gaza's collapse, is seeking to unseat a popular Palestinian resistance, while poorly managing multiple war fronts, with an Israeli government immune to US demands or pleas.

Washington couldn't deliver a Palestinian solution in the decades since peace was struck in Oslo – so what can it possibly do now? Wealthy Arab states are not interested in carrying the load of the PA when even the US can barely keep it on life support. Even UAE leader Mohammad bin Zayed, the Arab point-man for the Abraham Accords with Israel, told Netanyahu to ‘go ask Zelensky’ when the Israeli PM came begging for money to prop up the PA.

Band-aid solutions are only ever temporary. It takes a mere few drops of water to destroy their efficacy. As religious settlers run wild throughout the West Bank, courtesy of the Netanyahu government – the US will be playing full-time nursemaid alone, in a vain effort to tend to each and every cut. We could be one wound away from the whole enterprise imploding.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/the-w ... -time-bomb

War cabinet lost Israel’s north: Israeli lawmaker

Former Security Minister Avigdor Lieberman said that Israel is 'not taking the necessary steps' to win the war

News Desk

JAN 15, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: AFP)

Israeli Knesset member and former Security Minister Avigdor Lieberman criticized the methods of the Israeli war cabinet in conducting the front with Lebanon.

“The War Cabinet lost the North,” Lieberman said on 14 January. " What is happening with Hezbollah is lawlessness of the first order. If we don't come to our senses quickly, we will lose control over strategic parts for the security of the State of Israel.”


Lieberman also commented on photos that showed life returning to normal in Gaza, saying, “the lively markets in Jabaliya overflowing with people buying from everything nearby, and the Shifa Hospital that has returned to full operation.” He then observed how, in contrast, “tens of thousands” of settlers who resided in the Gaza envelope were “still very far from returning to normal” and “scattered” across the country.

“That's not how you run a war, that's not how you defeat Hamas,” Lieberman said.

Nonetheless, Lieberman's claims that life in Gaza is back to normal are false. According to local activists, the pictures the MK refers to show Palestinian police officers in Jabalia, Gaza, Deir al-Balah, Khan Younis, and Rafah, who were “deployed as a precaution against any security deterioration that may occur due to the ongoing war in the Gaza Strip."

Addressing the Lebanon border front, Hezbollah's Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah noted that the Israeli army was no longer the army that they had militarily triumphed over in the past, saying: “The Israeli army, when it was in good shape and fully equipped, was destroyed in the face of our resistance fighters during the July War of 2006 … Israel and its settlers are the ones who should fear war, not Lebanon.”

“We have been ready for war for 99 days and are not afraid of war. We will fight without limit [if war is imposed on us],” he noted.

Other Members of the Knesset have been critical of the war cabinet and their decisions regarding this war against Palestinian resistance factions, precisely the policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In November, reports emerged of Netanyahu’s own Likud party discussing the impeachment of the current prime minister, saying that if he remains in the party and an election is held, most party members will give a vote of no confidence.

The Cradle's Palestinian Correspondent has said that one potential outcome is emerging from this war: "the potential demise of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's political career.”

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/war-c ... i-lawmaker
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply