Palestine

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Jun 15, 2024 11:35 am

The Israeli plot to pit the West Bank resistance against the PA

In a bid to undermine resistance groups in the occupied West Bank, Israel is strategically targeting key individuals to incite discord between armed factions and the Palestinian Authority, intensifying an already volatile situation marked by unprecedented violence and political maneuvering.


Robert Inlakesh

JUN 14, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

After failing to destroy resistance factions in the occupied West Bank, The Cradle has learned that Israeli forces plan to target specific individuals to create tensions between the armed groups and the Palestinian Authority (PA).

This effort includes an alleged meeting held in Tel Aviv between Hussein al-Sheikh, head of the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) ’s executive committee, and Major General Ghasan Alyan, head of Israel’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT).

The Tel Aviv trip by Sheikh, the man favored by Israel to lead the PA once President Mahmoud Abbas retires, was organized to discuss methods of “de-escalating tensions and allowing West Bank workers to travel into Israeli territory for work,” according to an anonymous source in his office.

The rise of West Bank resistance

Over 530 Palestinians have been killed in the occupied West Bank since 7 October, making the past eight months the most violent period there since the Second Intifada. Although the Hamas-led Operation Al-Aqsa Flood was formally staged in the Gaza Strip, the fighting in the northern West Bank has now coalesced into what can be called a second Palestinian front against the Israeli military.

Since the start of the war in Gaza, there have also been quantitative jumps in the complexity of ambushes and the effectiveness of explosive charges manufactured by resistance groups in the West Bank.

Many of the West Bank’s armed resistance groups, as we know them today, formed in the wake of the events of May 2021, when Hamas led its 11-day ’Sword of Jerusalem’ battle against the Israeli military. Simultaneously, the concept of the ‘Unity of Fronts,’ or ‘Unity of the Squares,’ emerged in defense of Al-Aqsa Mosque across occupied Palestine, and the ‘Joint Operations Room of Resistance Factions’ was established.

Initially consisting of only a few dozen young armed men from the Jenin Refugee Camp, by September of that year, a group organized by Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)’s armed wing, the Quds Brigades, would officially declare themselves the Jenin Brigade.

What was interesting about the Jenin Brigade was that despite being led by PIJ, it also included members from the Fatah-aligned Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, along with members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), and Hamas armed wings.

Israel’s knee-jerk response was to raid Jenin and kill both fighters and civilians, triggering conflict even more broadly. In February 2022, Israeli special forces carried out a reckless daytime assassination of three Palestinians traveling in a civilian car in Nablus, who were later identified as members of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades.

On 31 March 2022, after several “lone-wolf” attacks against Israelis that left 19 dead, the military announced “Operation Break the Wave” in the West Bank. This operation would begin with arrest campaigns, focusing clearly on the areas where the newly formed resistance groups emerged, which had begun expanding beyond the area of Jenin by that time.

The operation, formulated from an earlier Israeli strategy to combat hundreds of lone-wolf attacks between October 2015 and early 2016, inflicted mass civilian casualties and only succeeded at encouraging the growth of the armed resistance groups.

According to local Nablus-based journalist Ahmad al-Bazz, the Israeli military’s violence played a large role in fueling armed struggle in his city and would later give birth to the Lions’ Den armed faction, formally announced in the Old City of Nablus in October 2022.

Another influencing factor was the assassination of 19-year-old Ibrahim Nabulsi, who valiantly fought to the death when cornered by an Israeli special forces team that August.

In early 2023, when it had become apparent that Palestinian armed resistance groups were effectively taking control of areas like the Jenin Refugee Camp and the Old City of Nablus, US security coordinator Michael Fenzel proposed a “security plan” to the PA.

The proposal, dubbed the “Fenzel Plan,” was reportedly accepted by the PA and included the US-backed formation of a special PA force to counter the armed groups and retake security control in the northern West Bank.

Israel’s divide and rule strategy

While this was underway, Tel Aviv was already working on implementing its own divide-and-rule strategy to sow chaos between Palestinians in the West Bank. Younis Tirawi, a reporter known on social media for his intimate knowledge of the PA and Palestinian armed groups in the West Bank, tells The Cradle that Israel had already begun arresting PA officers involved with the resistance back in November 2022.

Then, in the summertime [2023], they arrested a Palestinian intelligence officer who was coordinating on the ground between the PIJ and Fatah groups.

According to two PA sources who wish to remain unnamed, the Fenzel Plan has now been effectively forgotten and won’t proceed, allegedly due to the Ramallah-based PA’s strained relationship with Washington.

Although it is impossible to confirm whether this information is fully accurate, there have been no known developments regarding the creation of a PA-specialized anti-resistance force.

The PA’s complicated relationship with the resistance

The Palestinian resistance groups in the West Bank may fight under the same banners in many cases but have varying relations and predicaments with the PA throughout the territory. In Jenin, for instance, many of the fighters belonging to Jenin Brigade were the sons of high-ranking PA-linked figures, like Fathi Khazem, while many others were actually PA Security Force (PASF) officers who had chosen the path of armed resistance.

In early 2023, the interconnectivity between the PASF and Jenin Brigade was such that a direct line of communication via handheld radios allowed for continuous coordination when needed. It appears the Israelis caught on to this and cracked down, as the obvious ties between the resistance and local PA forces made it difficult to characterize the fighters as bandits or outlaws seeking to violently challenge the PA’s security control. As Tirawi describes the scene at the time:

During the second invasion of Jenin, after the beginning of the Gaza war, they arrested all the Fatah members who were dual fighters and [PA] security officers who were not going to work, and people who were part of al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. That was the main point when they began arresting senior figures coordinating between armed groups and the Palestinian Authority. There is always going to be tensions in any place or any city where there are [two armed forces] because you are taking away the Palestinian Authority’s influence and their ability to enforce the law in the area.

Tirawi gives the example of the Tulkarem Brigade, which finds itself in a different predicament than Jenin and operates in an area with greater tensions with the PA. He explained that fighters often conceal their identities, and the PA forces there cannot distinguish between fighters and criminal elements.

This is especially the case, he says, when it comes to issues of weapons transfers into the city, and can often cause confusion in a setting where the PASF is tasked with managing security there.

There are, however, blatant examples, especially in Tulkarem, of PA forces outrageously opening fire upon resistance fighters and confiscating their weapons from them.

A source from Tulkarem, speaking with The Cradle on the condition of anonymity, reveals that the financing and ammunition that supplies Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades there reach these fighters through the PIJ’s armed wing in the city.

This information matched what local journalists from Nablus and Tulkarem had also come to understand, further demonstrating the interconnectivity between the resistance factions.

PA’s stance on PIJ and Hamas

Last year, a group emerged from Tulkarem’s Nour Shams refugee camp, calling itself Jund Allah and stating it was independent of any political party. However, after a number of their fighters were killed during Israeli incursions into the camp, this group later evolved into a small Qassam Brigades (armed wing of Hamas) aligned group.

While the PA will allow PIJ-aligned fighters to exist, they have little tolerance for anyone belonging to Hamas. According to the same source, once it was understood that the PIJ was aiding Hamas-aligned fighters in Tulkarem, this caused further friction with the PA.

On 6 November, Israel decided to assassinate the 24-year-old leader of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in Tulkarem, named Jihad Ishhadeh, whose father is a Brigadier General in the PA’s security forces and is known to be friendly toward PA President Mahmoud Abbas. This is again an example of the Israeli occupation forces specifically going after fighters who maintain strong connections with the ruling PA.

The Nablus Equation

When the group known as the Lions’ Den emerged from the Old City of Nablus, it was a major cause for concern in both the PA and Israeli security establishments. Having witnessed the power that the Jenin Brigade had generated and the fact that they were able to openly hold military parades in Jenin City, the fear arose that this could soon be the case in Nablus and that it could lead to resistance fighters emulating this model in other cities too.

Nablus, unlike Jenin, is surrounded by Israeli settlements and military sites that are more open to armed attacks. The Lions’ Den emerged as a group that managed to command enormous support throughout occupied Palestine and even into the refugee camps in Lebanon. Formed of young fighters from a range of Palestinian factions, it formed alliances with other resistance groups in the surrounding refugee camps, like Balata camp.

It didn’t take the Israeli military long to begin carrying out assassinations and large-scale attacks in attempts to break up the Lions’ Den. For instance, Tamir al-Kilani, one of the founding members of the Lions’ Den and a member of the PFLP’s armed wing, the Martyr Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades, was murdered in an Israeli booby-trapped motorbike explosion.

Many of the Lions’ Den’s leading members, affiliated with the PIJ movement, were also killed during various invasions of Nablus, while the PA arrested and imprisoned Musab Shtayyeh, the most prominent Hamas member who helped lead the group.

This left a much less diverse crowd of fighters to lead the Lions’ Den, who were commanded by Oday al-Azizi. Unlike Hamas members, some Fatah-affiliated fighters are given the option to remain under PA detention temporarily, avoiding assassination and arrest by the Israeli occupation forces.

Azizi, who is married to a woman from a prominent family loyal to PA President Abbas, is also a PA security officer himself and has worked to manage the relationship between the PA and the Lions’ Den for some time.

However, the Lions’ Den gradually saw its power decline and was left isolated due to its difficult predicament. The US Biden administration has just recently targeted the group with sanctions for its participation in armed activities in the West Bank, but it now plays a marginal role, if any.

While Tirawi informs The Cradle that “it is already over … the main structure has been dismantled,” two anonymous sources affiliated with West Bank resistance groups say that it has reduced in power and is not really present, as other armed groups are currently resisting Israeli incursions into Nablus instead of it.

Despite Israeli attempts to disband the resistance groups throughout the West Bank and to sever their ties to local PA elements to encourage internecine fighting, the groups persist.

Whether they will expand their operations in the near future is contingent on their ability to navigate their way through a complicated environment, evading persecution from the PASF and the Israeli military while implementing more sophisticated tactics and developing greater weapons capabilities.

https://thecradle.co/articles/the-israe ... nst-the-pa

Washington 'cannot verify' whether Israel using US intel to massacre civilians

The US has provided an 'extraordinary amount' of intelligence to Israel amid its genocidal campaign in Gaza

News Desk

JUN 14, 2024

Image
A Palestinian man walks amid rubble following an Israeli military operation that rescued four hostages held by Hamas in the Nuseirat camp, in the central Gaza Strip, on June 8, 2024. (Photo credit: Eyad Baba/AFP)

US lawmakers fear Israel may be using US-supplied intelligence to carry out bombings that kill civilians in Gaza, the Washington Post reported on 14 June.

Since the beginning of the war in Gaza, the US has shared “an extraordinary amount of drone footage, satellite imagery, communications intercepts, and data analysis using advanced software, some of it powered by artificial intelligence,” current and former US and Israeli intelligence officials told the newspaper.

Some US officials described Israel’s demand for more intelligence as “insatiable.”

However, given Israel’s regular targeting of civilians and repeated claims that there are no “innocent” Palestinians in Gaza, including children, this raises questions about how the intelligence is being used.

Israel has killed over 37,000 Palestinians in its horrific eight-month bombing campaign while turning huge sections of Gaza into a “moonscape.”

The Post reports that some US lawmakers worry that the intelligence provided by the US is making its way into data repositories that Israeli forces use to conduct airstrikes or other military operations and that there are no effective means of monitoring how the information is used.

The White House claims it has forbidden Israel from using any US-supplied intelligence to target regular Hamas fighters in military operations. The intelligence is only to be used for locating the captives held by Hamas and targeting the top leadership of the group, including Yahya Sinwar and Mohammad Deif.

However, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said last month that the intelligence is “not tied or conditioned on anything else,” and Israel killed 247 Palestinians during an operation to rescue four captives last week that relied in part on US intelligence.

The Post adds that “practically speaking, Israel is on its honor not to use US-supplied intelligence for proscribed purposes,” current and former US officials familiar with the intelligence-sharing relationship said.

US Congress member Jason Crow, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, has questioned how White House officials can be sure that Israel is not using the intelligence it receives as part of its bombing campaign in Gaza, which has killed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians and is widely viewed as genocide by the international community.

Crow, an Army combat veteran, co-authored legislation enacted last year requiring the director of national intelligence to notify Congress if intelligence that the US provides another country results in civilian casualties.

“Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu is pursuing a failed strategy in Gaza. The terrible civilian toll, famine, and lack of a coherent strategy are deeply concerning,” Crow said in a statement to the Post. “I will continue to conduct robust oversight to ensure intelligence sharing is in line with US interests."

https://thecradle.co/articles/washingto ... -civilians

US lawmakers block funding for Gaza reconstruction

Despite global outrage over Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, the US Congress has doubled down on support for Washington’s ‘best ally’

News Desk

JUN 13, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: AFP)

The US House of Representatives on 12 June approved an amendment to the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act that prevents the Pentagon from allocating any of its ballooning budget for reconstruction efforts in Gaza.

“None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available to the Secretary of Defense for fiscal year 2025 may be made available to build in or rebuild the Gaza Strip on or after the date of the enactment of this Act,” the amendment reads.

The provision was introduced by Republican lawmakers Brian Mast, Claudia Tenney, and Eli Crane. Although House Democrats opposed the amendment, they did not request a recorded vote and allowed it to pass by a simple voice vote.

“[The Palestinians] are absolutely at war with one of our major and best allies anywhere across the globe,” Mast said during Wednesday’s session, adding that it is “nonsensical” to suggest the US should spend a fraction of its nearly $1 trillion defense budget on rebuilding a place that has been razed to the ground by US-made weapons and with direct support from the Pentagon.

“The House advancing anti-Palestinian amendments into legislation at this stage reaffirms that many in Congress do not value the lives of their Palestinian constituents,” Mohammed Khader, a policy manager at US Campaign for Palestinian Rights Action, told reporters.

“Blocking funds to rebuild Gaza while actively providing taxpayer dollars, weapons, and intelligence to destroy Gaza and Palestinian society reaffirms that lawmakers intend for the US to be an active participant in Israel’s atrocities,” he added.

Since the start of Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, the US has delivered hundreds of arms shipments to the country and has provided persistent political cover for Israeli authorities.

US lawmakers have gone as far as to threaten sanctioning officials from the International Criminal Court (ICC) and cutting funding for UN agencies due to their support for an end to the genocide of Palestinians.

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-lawmak ... nstruction

Israeli warplanes kill civilians in south Lebanon as Hezbollah intensifies attacks
Earlier this week, Hezbollah launched its largest attacks on Israel since the start of the war after Israel killed a top Hezbollah commander

News Desk

JUN 14, 2024

Image
Two men stand by a truck as they watch smoke plumes rising from a fire in a field after rockets launched from southern Lebanon landed near Katzrin in the Golan Heights on June 13, 2024. (Photo credit: Jalaa MAREY / AFP)

A powerful Israeli airstrike in southern Lebanon overnight killed two women, including a medic, and injured at least twenty more, L'Orient Today reported on 14 June.

The strike resulted in the most casualties of any Israeli attack since the start of the war on 8 October.

Israeli warplanes fired missiles, destroying a three-story house and damaging nearby buildings located between the towns of Jannata and Deir Qanoun al-Nahr near the coastal city of Tyre (Sur).

The female victims were Sally Salaiki, who worked as a paramedic with the Amal Movement, and Dalal Ezzedine. The twenty injured included children and infants, who were taken to hospitals in Tyre for treatment.

L'Orient Today adds that Deir Qanoun is the home village of Hashem Safieddine, the chair of Hezbollah's Executive Council and cousin of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

A spokesperson from Hezbollah dismissed rumors that Safieddine and other officials from the resistance had been killed in the strike.

Rescue teams are still working to clear the debris and search for more victims under the rubble. Videos circulating online show piles of rubble and large fires caused by the strikes.

The overnight strike comes amid a broader escalation of the conflict between Hezbollah and Israel this week.

In an airstrike on Tuesday, the Israeli army assassinated Talib Abdallah, the highest-ranking Hezbollah official killed since the start of the war.

In response, Hezbollah fired hundreds of rockets and missiles at multiple Israeli military bases and critical positions on Wednesday. On Thursday, Hezbollah launched missile attacks against nine Israeli army sites simultaneously, the largest rocket attack of this kind since October.

Hezbollah's attacks from Lebanon have become increasingly more precise over recent months after the resistance managed to take out more than 1,500 Israeli intelligence posts and devices.

Israeli analysts have determined that launching a wide-scale attack against Lebanon would prompt Hezbollah to fire thousands of rockets and precision missiles at Israel per day, which they predict would collapse its air defense systems and cause major destruction in Israel's cities.

But many in Israel's political and defense establishment continue calling for a full ground invasion of Lebanon and the bombing of its capital, Beirut.

On 5 June, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich called to expand the war in Gaza and invade southern Lebanon during Jerusalem Day speeches.

Leading the crowd in a chant of “victory,” Ben Gvir said that Israel would only win after it “enters all of Gaza and fights until victory.”

“And for victory, we need to go into the north and fight Hezbollah and destroy them,” he shouted to the crowd.

On 12 June, Hebrew daily Walla reported that senior US officials expressed concern that Israel plans to make a “proactive move” against the Lebanese resistance on its northern front and spark a full-blown war “without a clear strategy.”

“The US fears that Israel will make a proactive move that will lead to a war with Hezbollah or will be dragged into such a war without a clear strategy and without thinking a few steps ahead about the consequences of such a scenario,” Israeli journalist Barak Ravid quotes the unnamed US officials as saying.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-w ... es-attacks

*******

Aggravation in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict zone
June 14, 2024
Rybar

Image

In the north of the Gaza Strip, Israeli troops also attacked the capital of the enclave. The hits occurred in the Az-Zeitun region , located in the south of Gaza . Sporadic clashes also continue between IDF units and members of Palestinian militias.

In the south of the Gaza Strip, according to preliminary information, the IDF has begun activities to complete the ground operation in Rafah . The situation in the coastal area of ​​Al-Mawasi remains unclear : after violent clashes days earlier, fighting has virtually ceased.

Along the Lebanese-Israeli border, large Hezbollah rocket salvoes continue to be launched into northern Israel. About 40 missiles were launched in the direction of the Upper Galilee regions. And last night the Israel Defense Forces bombed the southern part of Lebanon .

In the Red Sea region, the Yemeni Houthis attacked three merchant ships with cruise and anti-ship ballistic missiles, managing to document one of them. And Iranian proxies from Iraq again reported launching kamikaze drones against Israel.

https://rybar.ru/obostrenie-v-zone-izra ... flikta-13/

******

Operation Prosperity Guardian failed
June 14, 17:17

Image

Against the backdrop of regular Houthi attacks on various merchant ships in the Red Sea (with the help of drones, missiles and BECs), the United States mournfully announced that “Operation Guardian of Prosperity, which was supposed to force the Houthis to stop attacks on ships associated with Israel, has failed.”

In fact.

1. The attacks not only did not stop, but intensified. Their performance is increasing.
2. The Houthis’ attack tools are steadily expanding - they started with drones, moved on to missiles of various types, and now BECs are being actively introduced.
3. The range of Houthi attacks has extended to the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. The risk zone is increasing, which is already affecting the routes of merchant ships.
4. The US AUG was forced to retreat from the shores of Yemen after direct attacks on it. The United States and Britain are making efforts to conceal the possible consequences of attacks on warships off the coast of Yemen.
5. Traffic of ships connected to the USA, Britain and Israel through the Suez Canal is steadily declining. Promises to protect them with warships do not reduce risks.
6. Israel's economy is suffering billions of dollars in systemic damage due to the knock-on effects of Houthi attacks, which have forced many shipowners to send ships through the Cape of Good Hope rather than through the Suez Canal.
7. The Houthis, in fact, right during Operation Guardian of Prosperity, established a permitting regime for passage off the coast of Yemen, which is carried out by some shipowners who publicly indicate that they have no relations with Israel.
8. Frightened by the actions of the Houthis, some countries in the region dependent on the United States actually refused to support direct US attacks on the Houthis, fearing that the Houthis’ missile strikes in response would be very painful.
9. US attempts to reach an agreement with the Houthis diplomatically, with promises to lift some of the sanctions and remove the Houthis from the list of “terrorists,” failed, as the Houthis took a principled position in supporting Hamas and the Gaza Strip.
10. In general, the Houthis are successfully achieving strategic and tactical goals, while the United States and Britain are clearly failing - once again the United States cannot achieve anything worthwhile with conventional bombing in the Middle East. The blows of the American hammer get stuck in the sands of Iran's proxy strategy. Qassem Soleimani would be pleased with this development.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9206541.html

Google Translator

******

US Service Members to Congress: ‘Stop Genocide’
June 14, 2024

As Israel continues its genocide against the Palestinians, the number of active-duty U.S. conscientious objectors is increasing, writes Marjorie Cohn.

Image
Protesters form “the people’s red line” around the White House to demand end of Gaza genocide on June 12, 2024. (Diane Krauthamer, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

By Marjorie Cohn
Truthout

On June 4, a coalition of active-duty service members, veterans and G.I. rights groups launched a campaign called Appeal for Redress V2 to encourage military personnel to tell Congress to stop funding genocide in Gaza.

Israel’s genocidal operation, now in its ninth month, has killed more than 37,000 Palestinians and wounded nearly 85,000.

The campaign is sponsored by Veterans For Peace (VFP), the Military Law Task Force of the National Lawyers Guild, About Face: Veterans Against the War and the Center on Conscience & War. It is modeled after the 2006 Appeal for Redress issued during the occupation of Iraq.

During that campaign, almost 3,000 active-duty, Reserve and Guard personnel sent protected communications to their members of Congress urging an end to the wars and occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Appeal for Redress V2 was formulated to help G.I.s directly tell their representatives that they oppose U.S. support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

“We will not stand by silently while genocide unfolds,” Senior Airman Juan Bettancourt, an active-duty member of the U.S. Air Force, stated at a June 4 press conference announcing the campaign. “We refuse to be complicit” in the “unspeakable carnage,” said Bettancourt, who is seeking separation from the U.S. military as a conscientious objector.

Kathleen Gilberd, executive director of the Military Law Task Force of the National Lawyers Guild and my coauthor for Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent, told Truthout there has been an increase in the number of applications for conscientious objection (CO) and other types of honorable discharge from the military.

“Many military personnel have serious objections to the U.S. support for Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians,” Gilberd said.

According to a June 3 statement from Bill Galvin, counseling director at the Center on Conscience and War, “Almost all of [the CO applicants] cite the carnage in Gaza as something that their conscience would not allow them to ignore. Some have expressed feeling complicit in the violence.”

Gilberd noted the significance of these protests, saying: “As in the Vietnam War, Iraq War and Afghanistan War, G.I. resistance is a powerful force for peace. The National Lawyers Guild’s Military Law Task Force and our allies stand in support of these military dissenters and resisters.”

Senior Airman Larry Hebert, who recently conducted a hunger strike in front of the White House in solidarity with the people of Gaza, noted at the press conference that, “Genocide didn’t start on October 7.” He added: “It’s been going on for 76 years. It’s time for it to come to an end.”

Hebert was referring to the 1947-48 Nakba, when 750,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their land in the process of creating the state of Israel. Hebert said the groups sponsoring the Appeal for Redress are calling for a ceasefire, an end to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and protection of the human rights of Palestinians and their right to self-determination.

Image
Hebert stands outside of the White House with a sign explaining his hunger strike. (Veterans for Peace)

“I have been taught that honor and integrity are pivotal to being a soldier,” Army Sergeant Johnson said in the June 3 press release. “It hurts me to my core that the same country that instilled these values in me would proudly support a genocide.”

He added, “It is our duty as service members to uphold Geneva Conventions and international law. That is why I am pleading for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and for humanitarian aid to be distributed throughout the entire Gaza Strip.”

Will Hopkins, former executive director of Veterans For Peace, said at the press conference it was “absolutely unconscionable” that U.S. money has been used to kill more than 14,000 children in Gaza.

“The Appeal for Redress, initiated by military personnel, provides an important, protected way for service members to tell their members of Congress that they oppose the U.S.’s funding and support of Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” Gilberd told Truthout. “It is literally the tip of an iceberg of military dissent about the war and the U.S.’s role.” She cited the significance of individual, small, silent protests — in addition to bold and public acts of refusal.

Indeed, some of the speakers at the press conference honored the memory of Aaron Bushnell, an active-duty member of the U.S. Air Force who set himself on fire on Feb. 25 outside the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C. to protest Israel’s genocide and U.S. complicity in it. He live-streamed the act, stating, “I will no longer be complicit in genocide” before he lit himself on fire, repeatedly yelling “Free Palestine!” as the flames engulfed him.

Image
Remembering Aaron Bushnell sign at a Pro-Palestine demonstration on April 21, 2024, in Marseille, France. (AN2303, Wikimedia Commons, CC0)

Major Harrison Mann, a Jewish officer who worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency, recently resigned from the U.S. Army over what he called the United States’ “nearly unqualified support for the government of Israel,” which he says has “enabled and empowered the killing and starvation of tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians.”

Mann went public with his resignation in May after the State Department issued a report concluding it was “reasonable to assess” that Israel had used U.S. weapons in ways “inconsistent” with international law. Shortly after that report was published, the Biden administration decided to send Israel $1 billion more in weapons and ammunition.

The Appeal for Redress

“We know many young people join the military out of necessity to get their needs met. But they are not obligated to contribute to genocide and unjust, unlawful wars that go against their conscience,” said Shiloh Emelein, U.S. Marine Corps veteran and operations director of About Face: Veterans Against the War, in the Appeal’s June 3 press release. “You do have rights, you do have options to object, and there’s a large community of post-9/11 veterans ready to welcome you.”

The Appeal for Redress employs the language of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which says,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (emphasis added).

“Though their rights are somewhat limited by military law, service members can still speak out about their beliefs and protest the travesty of this war,” Gilberd said. Department of Defense Instruction 1325.06 protects the First Amendment rights to free speech and protests.

Moreover, a federal statute, 10 U.S. Code § 1034, says, “No person may restrict a member of the armed forces in communicating with a Member of Congress or an Inspector General.”

Bill Galvin said at the press conference that military personnel have the right to be politically engaged as long as they’re off duty, off base and out of uniform and make clear they’re not speaking on behalf of the military. They can’t show disrespect to the chain of command, including the commander-in-chief.

The Appeal for Redress warns service members that they could face illegal retaliation by their command; the letter could be used against them in a court-martial for civil disobedience; and they could be punished if they reveal classified information without permission, make threats, use “contemptuous words” about chain of command (including the president) or make “disloyal” statements.

This courageous effort by service members and veterans follows in a long tradition of dissent in the U.S. military, from Vietnam to Iraq to Afghanistan. The G.I. movement during the Vietnam War was integral to ending that war.

Weapons to Israel Violates U.S. Statutes

Image
Following an Israeli airstrike, Palestinians transport the injured to the Indonesian Hospital in Jabalia, north of the Gaza Strip on Oct. 9, 2023. (Wafa in contract with a local company, APAimages)

These active-duty service members oppose U.S. funding of Israel’s genocide both because it’s immoral and because U.S. government employees are violating several federal statutes when weapons are shipped to Israel.

In a Feb. 11 letter to the U.S. State Department, Veterans For Peace urgently demanded that the State Department “immediately suspend ongoing shipments of military weapons and munitions” from the U.S. to Israel. VFP also demanded “that the consideration of approvals of prospective shipments be terminated immediately.”

The VFP letter cited violations of the Foreign Assistance Act, Arms Export Control Act, Leahy Laws, Conventional Arms Transfer Policy, U.S. War Crimes Act and the Genocide Convention Implementation Act.

Those laws prohibit the transfer of weapons and munitions when there is credible evidence that the arms will be used by the country to commit, or aggravate the risk that the country will commit, war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, and other serious violations of international humanitarian law or international human rights law.

The letter quoted the sworn declaration of Josh Paul that was filed in the Defense for Children International–Palestine v. Biden lawsuit in which Palestinians sued President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Lloyd Austin for failure to prevent genocide and complicity in genocide.

Paul served as director of congressional and public affairs in the State Department’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs before resigning in October 2023 in protest of U.S. arms transfers to Israel.

Josh Paul resigned from the State Dept over sending arms to Israel. “I have heard from actually so many hundreds of colleagues at this point who support what I did,” he says. “They are finding what is happening both a moral disaster and a policy disaster for the United States.” pic.twitter.com/1M07cxeAwG

— Christiane Amanpour (@amanpour) December 4, 2023


“I believe it is clear that the U.S. government is failing not only to execute the due diligence required under existing U.S. laws, but is actively creating and utilizing processes that help insulate Israel from accountability or sanctions in accordance with existing U.S. laws and policies,” Paul wrote in his declaration in the lawsuit.

“The failure to execute meaningful due diligence or adequately apply existing U.S. laws permits the unfettered flow of military assistance to Israel forces with minimal oversight that leads to unnecessary civilian harm, gross violations of human rights, and impunity for violations of international law.”

Meanwhile, on June 6, Israeli airstrikes on a United Nations-run school in central Gaza killed at least 40 people with explosive weapons provided by the United States. The school was sheltering about 6,000 displaced Palestinians, UNRWA Commissioner General Philippe Lazzarini said.

And on June 8, Israeli occupying forces, with U.S. support, killed at least 274 people, including dozens of children, and injured nearly 700 in a raid to rescue four hostages held by Hamas.

The same day, tens of thousands of people demonstrated at the White House in Washington, D.C., to protest the use of U.S. weapons and diplomatic support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The organizers of the Appeal for Redress encourage civilian supporters to share the appeal with their networks so that it reaches a larger number of service members.

Marjorie Cohn is professor emerita at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, former president of the National Lawyers Guild, and a member of the national advisory boards of Assange Defense and Veterans For Peace, and the bureau of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers. She is founding dean of the People’s Academy of International Law and the U.S. representative to the continental advisory council of the Association of American Jurists. Her books include Drones and Targeted Killing: Legal, Moral and Geopolitical Issues. She is co-host of “Law and Disorder” Radio.

This article is from Truthout and reprinted with permission.


https://consortiumnews.com/2024/06/14/u ... -genocide/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Jun 16, 2024 12:19 pm

Israel's Rescue Massacres Civilians and Censors Media

Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 12 Jun 2024

Image
People's Red Line protest at the White House on June 8, 2024 Mandel Ngan / AFP via Getty Images

Israel is crowing about rescuing four people held hostage and killing more than 200 Palestinians in the process. It is typical behavior for the apartheid state but all of the pressure it exerts can’t end the scorn, contempt, and protest it faces all over the world.

The Israeli government could have freed everyone that was held by Hamas since Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on October 7, 2023, if it had continued the truce and negotiations that were taking place in November and December of 2023. The government has even killed some of the hostages in its attacks on Gaza, using the people it claims to care so much about as pawns, bargaining chips to serve nefarious ends at opportune moments.

One such moment took place on June 8, 2024, when Israeli forces used humanitarian aid trucks as cover to rescue four hostages while also killing an estimated 274 Palestinians . These same forces killed journalist Abdalah Aljamal along with his wife and his father, and then claimed without proof that the family was holding one of the captives in their home.

The entire operation was consistent with Israel’s past actions. It came on the heels of a massacre at a school that killed 40 people seeking refuge there, which came on the heels of an attack on a refugee tent camp in Rafah which also killed at least 40 people.

War crimes are nothing new for Israel, but large scale public protest is new and, despite Israel’s stranglehold on corporate media and the political duopoly, represents a threat to continued support. What is a genocidal apartheid nation to do? It has to continue the attack on human beings in Palestine and on any opposition to its client state.

The coordinated astroturf attack on journalist Briahna Joy Gray preceded the hostage rescue massacre. Gray was co-host of The Hill program, Rising, and was fired after months of good reporting, including questioning the narrative of mass rape by Hamas on October 7. It was pointed out that she “rolled” her eyes at a guest who was the sister of a hostage. Not only was she subjected to a relentless barrage of social media attacks, but even after she was fired her podcast was spammed in an effort to take it down. Of course, the mass rape narrative has quite rightly been questioned as relying on unsubstantiated claims and unethical reporting . However, telling the truth is not the point. Silencing critics and frightening others into silence is the point of Israeli war propaganda efforts which are needed now more than ever before.

Student protests on campuses across the country and mass action such as the People’s Red Line at the White House show that Israel is on shaky ground, with fewer supporters than it could traditionally rely upon. After the International Criminal Court (ICC) was finally forced to apply for arrest warrants for its leadership and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) twice ordered Israel to cease its actions in Gaza, it was harder to make the claim that this pariah state is a shining example of democracy in its region.

It comes as no surprise that Israel increased its activities that would have been called “malign influence” if committed by other nations. The Ministry of Diaspora Affairs utilized AI bots and other means to target Black lawmakers like Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Ritchie Torres, who, ironically, were always on board with support for the zionist state. Yet no stone can be unturned in a time of crisis when students in the liberal class are targeted for arrest and other forms of repression. ICC and ICJ condemnation is very dangerous, even when it is inadequate and lacks any meaningful enforcement measures.

That conundrum explains why Briahna Joy Gray and others are targeted. Brute force does the job when public opinion goes south. Making an example of a prominent person is a warning to others. We are all to be terrorized, fearing damage to professional lives and personal harassment as the Biden administration dithers with announcements of dead on arrival peace agreements that neither they nor the Israelis are serious about concluding.

Yet all of the censoring and pressure tactics can’t undo the damage wrought by the United States and Israel. The two countries are pariahs around the world, with only vassal states in the collective west supporting them. Even the citizens of those nations have turned against this project and will never view either nation in the same ways again. The massacres and deaths of at least 40,000 people cannot be unseen and what was the status quo of public opinion is in jeopardy.

Of course in the short term Israel still wins and will have a zionist U.S. president in November, regardless of whether it is Joe Biden or Donald Trump who emerges victorious. Benjamin Netanyahu will speak to congress for a record fourth time, but the proverbial genie is out of the bottle. Some members of congress have a little bit of spine and are publicly questioning the invitation. Netanyahu will surely be greeted by protests, making a political victory somewhat questionable. All of the support will be forced while sincere and heartfelt positive feelings about Israel will continue to be on the decline among the public.

The most important question is whether the people in this country will be cowed into silence or will dare to fight for change. Israel is not the only obstacle to peace and to true democracy but it represents everything from the power of the military industrial complex to various lobbies wielding influence and bought off and cowardly people refusing to work on behalf of the nation’s best interest. Shutting down campus protests and restricting freedom of expression only escalates a political crisis, a crisis of legitimacy that cannot be undone.

https://blackagendareport.com/israels-r ... sors-media

*****

Intense Israeli raids destroy homes, bury civilians alive across Gaza

Israel continues to bomb residential homes and kill civilians in Gaza amid its efforts to maintain long-term security control of the strip

News Desk

JUN 15, 2024

Image
Palestinians carry belongings at the site of an Israeli strike on a house in Rafah, Gaza, on February 9. (Photo credit: Ibraheem Abu Mustafa/Reuters)

Israeli forces killed and injured scores of Palestinians in air strikes in central Gaza on 14 June while continuing their assault on the southern border city of Rafah.

WAFA news agency reported that Israeli warplanes bombed two residential homes housing displaced people in the Shujaiya neighborhood, east of Gaza City, killing five people and injuring others who were pulled from the rubble by ambulance teams.

Civil defense and ambulance crews also recovered the bodies of five others following an Israeli airstrike targeting a house in the Al-Tuffah neighborhood east of Gaza City.

At the same time, Israeli tanks and military vehicles bombed areas east of the city of Khan Yunis, south of the Gaza Strip, and the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood, southeast of Gaza City. Israeli forces also blew up residential buildings in the Al-Mughraqa area, north of the Nuseirat camp.

Al-Jazeera reported that the Israeli military continues to bomb areas in the western part of Rafah city, Tal al-Sultan, and in the vicinity of the Emirati field hospital, targeting the outskirts of an evacuation center based in a UNRWA school.

Residents are panicking as they are unable to leave these areas. They report that quadcopters and surveillance drones are flying above the area, chasing people and opening fire on them.

The Al-Jazeera correspondent added that in addition to the ongoing bombing, starvation and dehydration are threatening the lives of many people in the northern part of the Gaza Strip.

Hebrew news outlet Hadashot Bazman said fighters from the Qassam Brigades, the Hamas armed wing, fired an anti-tank missile at an Israel army Namer fighting vehicle in Rafah, killing eight Israeli soldiers inside and forcing others to be evacuated to hospitals in Israel.

Israeli security officials estimate that the army's military operation in Rafah will continue for two more weeks.

Public broadcaster KAN quoted senior security officials who estimated that the operation in the southern Gaza Strip would not take more than two weeks to be concluded. Israeli military officials have recommended that forces then be shifted to northern Israel to prepare for a broader conflict with the Lebanese Resistance Movement, Hezbollah, which has been punishing Israel military sites and settlements with increased frequency this week.

Israel began the Rafah invasion on 6 May, despite international warnings of the dangers to civilians. It also captured the Palestinian side of the Rafah border crossing, closing off the main entry point for humanitarian aid into Gaza.

Despite ongoing talk of a ceasefire among US officials and at the UN that would require an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, Israeli security officials said that the army plans to establish long-term control over Gaza. The officials stated they will maintain control of the Netzarim Corridor area, a road and buffer zone that separates Gaza from north to south. The officials said Israel will also retain control over the Rafah crossing and the Philadelphi Corridor area, a demilitarized buffer zone running along the border between the Gaza Strip and Egypt.

https://thecradle.co/articles/intense-i ... cross-gaza

US worried Israel will 'proactively' spark full-blown war with Hezbollah: Report

Cross-border tensions intensified after Israel assassinated a top resistance commander in southern Lebanon this week, prompting Hezbollah to launch a massive barrage of rockets

News Desk

JUN 13, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: JALAA MAREY/AFP via Getty Images)

Senior US officials say that the government is concerned that Israel plans to make a “proactive move” against the Lebanese resistance on its northern front and spark a full-blown war “without a clear strategy,” according to a report by Hebrew daily Walla.

“The US fears that Israel will make a proactive move that will lead to a war with Hezbollah or will be dragged into such a war without a clear strategy and without thinking a few steps ahead about the consequences of such a scenario,” Israeli journalist Barak Ravid quotes the unnamed US officials as saying.

Washington has intensified diplomatic efforts to avert such a scenario, with US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin recently conveying these fears to his Israeli counterpart, Yoav Gallant. According to Ravid, Washington’s concerns mainly stem from the possibility of getting dragged further into the simmering conflict.

“We are seeing an increase in activity in [Israel’s] north, and we don’t want things to escalate into a broader regional conflict … That was something that the secretary spoke with Mr Gallant about at length yesterday,” Pentagon spokeswoman Sabrina Singh said on Thursday.

Ravid also refers to his recent report in Axios in which he revealed the White House “made it clear to Israel in recent weeks that the idea that a ‘limited war’ could be launched in Lebanon is unrealistic” and also warned Tel Aviv that an Israeli ground invasion of Lebanon “would likely push Iran to intervene.”

Washington's diplomatic efforts include hosting the commander of the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), General Joseph Aoun, in the US capital this week. The ongoing push to clinch a ceasefire deal for Gaza has also been described as an attempt to quell tensions on the Lebanese–Israeli border.

Thursday’s report from Walla comes as cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and the Israeli army continue to intensify after the latest targeted assassination of a top resistance commander in southern Lebanon.

Since Wednesday morning, Hezbollah has fired hundreds of rockets and missiles at multiple Israeli military bases and critical positions. The attacks have also sparked large forest fires across Israel’s mostly-abandoned north.


Attacks from Lebanon have become increasingly more precise over recent months after the resistance managed to take out more than 1,500 Israeli intelligence posts and devices.

Israeli analysts have determined that launching a wide-scale attack against Lebanon would prompt Hezbollah to fire thousands of rockets and precision missiles at Israel per day, which they predict would collapse its air defense systems.

“If the Israeli enemy is screaming and moaning from what it’s suffering in northern Palestine, let it prepare to cry and wail,” the head of Hezbollah’s Executive Council, Hashem Safieddine, said on Wednesday, adding that Hezbollah operations against Israel “will increase in intensity, strength, quantity and quality."

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-worrie ... lah-report

Palestinians support 7 Oct op, oppose 'two state' and PA rule: Poll

Over 80 percent of Palestinians agree that the 7 October resistance attacks put the decades-long Israeli occupation of Palestine back at the center of global attention

News Desk

JUN 13, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

A new public opinion poll of Palestinians across the Gaza Strip and the occupied West Bank published on 13 June shows that a significant majority continue to support the Hamas-led Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, which precipitated Israel's campaign of genocide in Gaza eight months ago.

The poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PCPSR) was conducted between 26 May and 1 June and had a sampling size of 1,570 adults, of whom 760 were interviewed face-to-face in the West Bank and 750 in the Gaza Strip.

When respondents were asked whether they think the decision by Hamas to launch the 7 October attack on Israel's southern settlements was “correct or incorrect,” 67 percent of respondents supported the decision, while 26 percent opposed it.

Image

According to the PCPSR report, more than 80 percent of respondents said that Operation Al-Aqsa Flood “put the Palestinian issue at the center of attention and eliminated years of neglect at the regional and international levels.”

Sixty-seven percent of Palestinians also agreed that the Palestinian resistance would emerge victorious at the end of this war, with only 11 percent saying Israel would win and 18 percent picking neither.

Image

Support for the 7 October operation and expectations of a possible Hamas victory are higher in the West Bank than in the decimated Gaza Strip, where 50 percent of Palestinians picked either Israel or “none of them” as the eventual victor.

Nevertheless, most Palestinians agree that Hamas should rule the Gaza Strip once the genocidal war grinds to an end, with opposition to either the current Palestinian Authority (PA) or a “reformed” version coming from all sides.

Image

When asked about their satisfaction with Arab and regional actors, the highest satisfaction rate (71 percent) went to Yemen, which has been leading a months-long naval campaign against Israeli trade interests in the Red Sea, the Indian Ocean, and the Mediterranean Sea.

Yemen was followed by Qatar, which has been mediating ceasefire talks for several months, with 61 percent satisfaction. Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah and Iran came next, tied at 59 percent satisfaction.

Image

In regards to long-stalled western plans for a “two-state solution,” only 32 percent of Palestinians showed support for the idea, with 65 percent opposing it.

Image

Furthermore, a large majority of Palestinians say that the best way to “break the stalemate” with Israel is to “dissolve the PA” (62 percent) and “resort to an armed intifada” (63 percent).

Image

https://thecradle.co/articles/palestini ... -rule-poll

The BRICS weigh in on Palestine

The gravity around the newly-enlarged BRICS constellation is drawing in Arab, Muslim, and Global South adherents to the influential group's message on international law, Palestine, and halting forever wars.


Pepe Escobar

JUN 15, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

MOSCOW - Something of extraordinary magnitude happened in Moscow on 23 May. Bahrain's King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa personally asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to help organize a peace conference on Palestine, at which Russia would be the first non-Arab nation invited.

Al-Khalifa and Putin had two rounds of discussions - one of them closed - during which the main focus was always Palestine. The Bahraini monarch noted that in a rare show of unity, the Arab world had finally come together in agreement to end the war in Gaza. It was implied that Russia was subsequently chosen as the most reliable mediator to end the brutal conflict.

Bahrain – and the Arab League – recognize that the Russian position centers around what Putin had previously defined as the “UN formula”: an independent Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem.

That happens to be the position of the BRICS-10 nations and virtually the whole Global Majority. Crucially, it is also the common position of China and the Arab world, reaffirmed in Beijing only one week after the Russia-Bahrain meeting.

The problem is how to implement the “formula” when the US hegemon, Israel's unconditional ally, has a virtual stranglehold on the United Nations.

By 2020, as Tel Aviv was openly announcing the inevitable annexation of the West Bank, the Abraham Accords were smashing a major Arab taboo on openly supporting Israel, via the normalization agreements signed in Washington DC by Bahrain, the UAE, Morocco, and Sudan.

Nine months ago, Palestine was virtually isolated, and destined to extinction via quiet Israeli policies to incrementally force expulsion. But never underestimate the power of a genocide committed in broad daylight, on video. Today, the Russia-China strategic partnership, BRICS, and the Global Majority have been mobilized to enshrine Palestine as a sovereign state – faithful to the recent super-majority UN General Assembly vote to accept Palestine as a UN member.

It will be a long, winding, and thorny road that has the potential to split the world in two.

Lavrov lays it all out

The St. Petersburg forum last week offered three crucial messages to the Global Majority, focused around BRICS. The crux of the sessions may have been geoeconomics, but a now-unavoidable message of support to Palestine crept into the sidelines.

After a panel ostensibly debating the supply and demand of oil and gas, and which touched upon the principled role of Yemen in the Red Sea directed against the Gaza genocide, support for Palestine, amidst friendly smiles (but off the record), was emphatic from everyone - from OPEC secretary-general Haitham al-Ghais to the UAE’s Minister of Energy Suhail Mohamed al-Mazrouei.

Same on a Russia-Oman panel, coming from Minister of Commerce Qais bin Mohammed bin Moosa al-Yousef.

Earlier this week, the Palestine tragedy was addressed in detail – on points 34 and 35 – in the joint statement of the BRICS 10 Ministers of Foreign Affairs, who sat at the same table for the first time in Nizhny Novgorod, preparing for the extremely important annual BRICS summit next October in Kazan, under the Russian presidency. Three very important points were made there:

First, the Ministers “reaffirmed their rejection of any attempt aiming at forcefully displacing, expelling or transferring the Palestinian people from their land.” Second, they collectively “expressed serious concern at Israel’s continued blatant disregard of international law, the UN Charter, UN resolutions and Court orders.” And third, the ten foreign ministers:

“Reaffirmed their support for Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations and reiterated their unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution based on international law including relevant UNSC and UNGA resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative that includes the establishment of a sovereign, independent and viable State of Palestine in line with internationally recognized borders of June 1967 with East Jerusalem as its capital living side by side in peace and security with Israel.”

This is BRICS speaking with one voice – including, crucially, representatives of major Muslim-majority states: Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE. and Egypt.

Then Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, at an expanded BRICS session defined as BRICS+/BRICS Outreach, offered extra, important, context.

“We held an intra-Palestinian meeting in Moscow. We did this repeatedly. The last time it was held in late February and early March of this year, all Palestinian factions, including Hamas and Fatah, were present. For the first time, an event of this kind ended with the adoption of a joint statement in which everyone, including Hamas, expressed their readiness to unite the Palestinian ranks on the basis of the platform of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Previously, it was not possible to achieve this.”

Lavrov explained why, for Russia, it is essential to restore Palestinian unity:

“Only a united Palestine can be a partner in negotiations aimed at achieving the maximum desired outcome. As long as the Palestinians are divided, this is unlikely to work. Now, without any Palestinians, they are beginning to think about what to do with the Gaza Strip next: either to establish some kind of protectorate of Arab countries, or to introduce some kind of peacekeeping force, or to artificially declare that these will be territories governed by the Palestinian National Authority. These are all initiatives that are imposed by external players.”

And that brings us to the kernel of the Russian position: “The most important component of our long-term policy in this area will be to support the movement for the creation of a Palestinian state in full compliance with UN resolutions.”

How to respond “symmetrically”

All of the above sums up the carefully calibrated, official Russian position. Moscow abhors Israel's non-stop, irrational escalation while ceasefire proposals are on hand galore. At the same time, it won’t take sides – either with Hamas or with Yemen's Ansarallah. It is a consensus diplomats and Russia analysts routinely express: Russia will not get into a war thousands of kilometers away when it is fighting a US/NATO existential threat right at its western border.

After Putin’s answers in the Q&A following his address to the plenary session in St. Petersburg, debate raged on what sort of “symmetrical” responses Russia's ministry of defense would come up with to counterpunch NATO’s green light for strikes with long-range missiles inside the Russian Federation.

West Asia, predictably, features in the favorite scenario: advanced strike weapons deployed in Syria, described as “Syrian weapons” to mirror the west's “Ukrainian weapons” subterfuge. These would supplement arms already deployed at Russia's Khmeimim and Tartus bases – covering the Eastern Mediterranean, Lebanon, Israel, and US bases in Jordan, occupied Syria and occupied Iraq - and would be operated by Russian personnel, much as US/NATO personnel operate "Ukrainian" weapons.

A BRICS thorn

Now we come to the thorn in the BRICS flower arrangement - Saudi Arabia.

A discombobulated White House and US Deep State seem to have found a formula to wean Riyadh away from its new role as strong BRICS player: a landmark defense treaty, dubbed the Strategic Alliance Agreement, in the wings awaiting Riyadh's formalization of relations with Tel Aviv.

The Strategic Alliance Agreement would need to get a two-thirds majority vote in the US Senate. Yet insistence on “normalization with Israel” may well kill the deal, as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (MbS) now has options to carefully consider, not only regarding the Gaza tragedy, but over his new BRICS alliances.

Riyadh’s official position on Palestine is tied up with BRICS; end of the war/genocide in Gaza, and the establishment of a Palestinian state. And every grain of sand in the lands of Islam is fully aware that a Tel Aviv ruled by an ethnocentric mob of extremists won’t accept a two-state solution.

Moreover, a Saudi-US military alliance is totally incompatible with Riyadh becoming an influential member of BRICS. Chessboard moves are instead pointing to sooner or later a possible Global Majority military alliance to counterpunch the escalating US/NATO war - Hybrid and otherwise – against the dawning of a multinodal, polycentric, and in Putin’s terminology in St. Peterburg, “harmonic” multipolar world.

Add to it the expiration earlier this week of the US-Saudi agreement signed 50 years ago to establish the petrodollar, essentially in exchange for US military protection.

Already last year Riyadh made it clear the agreement would not be renewed when it clinched a deal with China based on energy trade using the petroyuan.

So in theory we are advancing further on down the road towards the demise of the petrodollar, coupled with the expansion of the digital yuan. The Central Bank of Saudi Arabia is now a “full participant” of Project mBridge, which unites the BIS Innovation Hub, the Central Bank of Thailand, the Central Bank of the UAE, the People's Bank of China, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

Essentially, mBridge is a multi-Central Bank digital currency (CBDC) platform shared among Central Banks and commercial banks, and enabling instant cross-border payments and settlement. Thailand, for instance, is buying oil from the UAE using mBridge.

There are no less than 26 mBridge observers – quite a mixed bag, including the China-led Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the European Central Bank, the IMF, and the World Bank.

As Saudi Arabia joins mBridge, Saudi Aramco - after opening itself to foreign investors with a huge IPO - has just ceded an extra 0.64 percent of its capital, with 60 percent of the buyers American. Aramco is a humongous fountain of dividends for shareholders: this year, that will amount to a whopping $141 billion.

Guess who are the top new investors? The Big Three – Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street - now all wallowing in Saudi oil.

Arabs, CENTCOM, and Israel: in bed together?

And now for the ultimate complicating factor.

On Monday, military officers from Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Jordan – which includes three BRICS members and Russia-friendly Bahrain - met with Herzi Halevi, the IDF’s Chief of General Staff to discuss…defense cooperation.

The meeting was facilitated by none other than the US CENTCOM. Although as low-profile as it gets, the meeting still leaked, given the juxtaposition of the Gaza genocide alongside a meeting of top Arab leaders sitting with the Arab world's worst enemies.

A post-modern epigone of the cynics dwelling in the Agora in Ancient Greece would remark that with CENTCOM Arab “friends” like these – three of them BRICS members - Palestine does not need enemies.

Meanwhile, the tragedy persists on so many levels. As Chinese high school students all across the civilization-state show their support for Palestine after taking their university entrance exams, the US-Israel axis homogenizes terrorism, linked to the debacle of Project Ukraine, coupled with the non-stop killing of Palestinians.

Everything is being sucked into the black hole of terrorism – complete with NATO now openly re-arming the neonazi Azov Battalion, and Kiev targeting civilians in Belgorod with drones and scattering mines in parks where kids play.

All the components of the Hegemon-fed Terror Foreign Legion are coming together, in lockstep with Israel, which is essentially ISIS with nuclear weapons. But for all their lofty ideals and sacred belief in the UN, the BRICS still have not come up with a solid, practical strategy to fight the horror.

https://thecradle.co/articles/the-brics ... -palestine

******

Released Palestinian Detainees Recount Horrors in Israeli Jails
JUNE 13, 2024

Image
Israeli soldiers tranfer Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip, on November 21, 2023. Photo: AFP.

Former detainee Aalam Hijazi says “prisoners were dying every day,” as the lack of food and medicine was allowing diseases to “eat their bodies.”

Palestinian detainees recently released by the Israeli occupation have spoken out about their ordeals at the hands of the Israeli jailers, including inhumane treatment and abuse.

Palestinians, who were detained by “Israel” without charges since the beginning of the war on Gaza, have retold harrowing tales of systemic mistreatment by prison personnel and reported being beaten by Israeli troops.

Speaking from Kamal Adwan Hospital in Gaza, they recounted violent and degrading treatment, including blindfolding and handcuffing inmates in small cages.

“We have left but we call on you to get the rest out,” implored former detainee Ataa Shbat from the Kamal Adwan Hospital in Gaza after his release.

Shbat expressed that many detainees thought they were presumed dead by their families.

“People are dying. Torture which you cannot imagine unless you taste it [experience it]. Suffering which you cannot imagine unless you experience it,” he recalled.

Former detainee Aalam Hijazi stated that “prisoners were dying every day,” as the lack of food and medicine was allowing diseases to “eat their bodies.”

He recalled wearing the same clothing since the war began, citing that even the water was not appropriate to drink.

The Palestinian Prisoners Society announced on Wednesday that six of the freed Palestinians were from Gaza, including orthopedic physician Adnan al-Bursh.

“Israel” has kidnapped more than 9,100 Palestinians from the occupied West Bank since October 7, 2023, according to reports. Thousands of people have “forcibly disappeared” from the restricted Gaza Strip. The occupation refuses to reveal just how many have been taken.

Last week, Israeli officials announced that they had begun transporting detainees from Sde Teiman, a former military outpost in the al-Naqab, after calls for the site’s closure.

At least 18 Palestinians have died in Israeli captivity since October. Israeli Police Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir proposed in April the execution of Palestinian detainees as a way to address overcrowding in Israeli occupation prisons.

In a post on X, Ben-Gvir asserted that imposing the death penalty on Palestinian detainees is the “right solution” to what he described as “the incarceration problem.”



UN expert demands ‘Israel’ probe troops’ torture of Palestinians

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Alice Jill Edwards compelled on Thursday the Israeli occupation to launch an investigation into multiple accounts of torture and other inhumane or degrading treatment of Palestinians in Israeli custody since October 7, 2023.

“The Israeli authorities must investigate all complaints and reports of torture or ill-treatment promptly, impartially, effectively and transparently,” Edwards said.

“Those responsible at all levels, including commanders, must be held accountable, while victims have a right to reparation and compensation,” she added.

Edwards reported receiving multiple accounts of Palestinians from the West Bank being subjected to beating, blindfolding, handcuffing, sleep deprivation, and threats of physical and sexual violence in Israeli prisons. She highlighted additional reports of prisoners being insulted, humiliated, and filmed in degrading poses, with some suffering wounds from prolonged use of zip-tie handcuffs.

“I am particularly concerned that this emerging pattern of violations, coupled with an absence of accountability and transparency, is creating a permissive environment for further abusive and humiliating treatment of Palestinians,” Edwards stated.

Earlier, in April, UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini accused “Israel” of subjecting thousands of Palestinians detained in the Gaza Strip to inhumane treatment, including stripping them naked and threatening them with dogs.

In January, Ajith Sunghay, head of the OHCHR Office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, reported that several thousand Palestinians had been secretly detained in the Gaza Strip since October 7 and subjected to cruel treatment.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) revealed in December that it had not been granted access to Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody since October 7, despite being ready to resume regular visits. Meanwhile, the Palestinian movement Hamas has repeatedly called on the ICRC to investigate these allegations of inhuman treatment.

(Al Mayadeen)

https://orinocotribune.com/released-pal ... eli-jails/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Jun 17, 2024 11:51 am

Hezbollah and Syrian Blood
JUNE 16, 2024

Image
Hezbollah fighters and Syrian army units take control of a position outside Qalamoun at the Syria-Lebanon border during a battle with ISIS in 2017. Photo: Al-Manar TV.

By Musa al-Sada – June 6, 2024

Hezbollah fighters did not target nor spill the blood of Syrian civilians during the Syrian war. The preceding statement is accurate. It is not accurate because we want it to be, but because it is a fact, and because there is no evidence or witness that makes it contrary to the truth. And if there is evidence, then the burden of proof simply falls on the accuser.

The most important and obvious thing is that its correctness does not imply that statements like “the Syrian regime is dictatorial,” or “the Syrian war has mobilized sectarian identities and narratives in the Levant,” or “the Syrian revolution is supported and funded by Gulf countries and NATO countries” are either correct or incorrect. What makes the statement that Hezbollah’s resistance fighters did not shed Syrian civilian blood a frightening and bold statement that seems to defy reality, despite its truthfulness, has two reasons.

The first is that war and acute civil strife are based on chaotic and noisy narratives, bundled together and played like a cassette, with these narratives being drawn along sectarian and factional lines. However this is an incidental reason.

The main reason, however, is that this falsehood is politically motivated, targetting the resistance against the Zionist enemy and the United States. In other words, the most effective way for the Gulf states, NATO, and their followers to target the resistance project is to target it morally and as an idea (this is an old imperialist policy linking liberation movements with crime and drugs), in the form of a blatant and false claim that Hezbollah fighters entered a certain village, killed children and women, committed massacres against civilians, besieged cities, bombed the innocent, and ended a people’s aspirations for freedom and dignity.

The irony is that the Gulf and NATO’s need to make this claim is also the same political and strategic reason for Hezbollah’s entry into Syria. In other words, there is another party with a military-political project supported by the United States (and also the US directly) aiming to eliminate the resistance project, both militarily and morally, continuously to this day. The narrative implies that the Israeli air force attacks on Hezbollah’s resistance fighters and their comrades in Syria is part of the Israeli humanitarian intervention to protect Syrian civilians, and Washington’s support and criminal sanctions aim for human rights and democracy, and Hezbollah has thwarted this democratic project!

And here is the logical conclusion: without Hezbollah’s sacrifices against the objectives of this project, there would have been no Al-Aqsa Flood, and the the regional forces today would not be forging a new strategic equation against the Western axis of annihilation in such a miraculous way.

And here is another lost obviousness: the existence of such a Western project does not negate the existence of an internal conflict between Arab societies and a disintegration of identity, tyranny and the rule of a corrupt and sectarian clique. Rather, the Western project is based on exploiting these conflicts. Accordingly, a pivotal part of confronting it is not denying the internal contradictions or the Western project, but rather approaching them together. Unless we are under the illusion that the Arab political, economic and social situation without Western intervention is a bed of roses!



This dual approach is the most sincere path for all the sacrifices that have been made and the blood that has flown in the Levant, and for building a future that the Westerners cannot exploit anew. There is no luxury of choice in this approach, but rather a duty for the future of this region and its liberationist project, and also because we belong to an ethical and value system from which we derive our great revolutionary ideologies and slogans. Unless sectarianism, classism, tyranny, and the perpetuation of the social rift between the poor of our peoples are not on the agenda of the liberation project, the project of building the human of the Al-Aqsa Flood.

The paradox today, while hundreds of Hezbollah’s resistance fighters have been martyred in the noblest front against the Zionist enemy, is that the transgression and lying against these youths, either directly by branding them as killers, or the cowardly and brazen justification that they are martyrs today “despite what they did in Syria,” is a testament and witness to the entrenched political sectarianism at the Arab level.

There is no room here for maneuvering or pretending to be morally superior, for no matter what your narrative about the Syrian war is, the truth remains: these youths are the remaining honor of Lebanon against Israel, their hands were not stained with any crime against Syrians, and they are too noble to even acknowledge or defend against such an accusation. Rather, it is those who make these accusations that should be shunned for lying on the heads of the martyrs. It is accurate to say that those who transgress against Hezbollah’s fighters by accusing them of shedding Syrian civilian blood without evidence in the Syrian war have stood, and stand, in the trench of the Western project and feed on the perpetuation of the Arab civil strife. More importantly, in the middle of our existential war for this century, they are not even in the category of reluctance to support Palestine, but rather complicit against it.

Therefore, you see them being mobilized by the centrality of the Palestinian cause, trying to turn the Arab homeland into a basket of separate issues. Not because Palestinian blood is different, or more precious, but because it exposes that their pretense of caring about Syrian, Iraqi, Yemeni and other blood is only a justification for their allegiance to the United States and the West; and that this Palestinian blood exposes that this stance is against the interest of Syrian, Iraqi, Yemeni blood; and that the issue is not really a concern for anyone’s blood in an Arab blood Olympics.

The issue, simply put, is between those who want to tell us that the support and money of the European Union and the United States is in the interest of decentralized “issues,” so they resort to lying, and a Hezbollah fighter who has sacrificed, and is sacrificing, his blood in Syria and on the borders of Palestine for the same cause. They are the fighters who are killed and targeted by the Zionist enemy from Aleppo to southern Lebanon, as part of a single struggle, evidence of which is Israel’s own actions, which is the most eloquent testament to the truth and actions of these very martyrs themselves. The Hezbollah fighters said it and did it on every front: their blood was never spilled except on the path of Al-Quds.

(Al-Akhbar)

https://orinocotribune.com/hezbollah-and-syrian-blood/

******

Israel must end Rafah assault to confront Hezbollah in north: Army leaders

An Israeli security source said 'more decisive action' is needed as Hezbollah continues to punish Israel with rocket and drone attacks

News Desk

JUN 14, 2024

Image
IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi attends a Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee meeting at the Knesset in Jerusalem, July 18, 2023. (Photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

The Israeli army recommended ending its operation in Rafah in southern Gaza as soon as possible and moving forces to the north to confront Hezbollah, Hebrew Channel 12 reported on 14 June.

This week, Hezbollah launched the largest number of attacks since the start of the war in October, including drones and rockets, following the assassination of one of its senior commanders.

The Israeli army's Northern Command says it is focusing on targets that will reduce Hezbollah's attack capabilities. To do so, it recommended ending the operation in Rafah to Israel's political leadership in a war cabinet meeting on Thursday.

A security source told Channel 12 that more decisive action is needed in the northern arena to allow hundreds of thousands of Israelis to return to the settlements near the Lebanon border.

“Security can be brought through an agreement, we cannot bring a sense of security to the residents without taking active measures,” the source said. “A deep change must be made at the northern border if we want the residents to return home.”

Recent Hezbollah attacks have led to large fires in areas surrounding Israel's northern settlements.

The head of the Upper Galilee Regional Council, Amit Sofer, said yesterday: “The state must increase its firefighting forces before there is nothing left to defend. Our beautiful north is burning and our hearts are burning, we must remove the threat to the residents of the north and allow the IDF to strike a blow at the enemy so that he understands that every target that burns, we will rebuild.”

At the same time, Hezbollah officials have affirmed their resolve in confronting Israel.

“If the Israeli enemy is screaming and moaning from what it's suffering in northern Palestine, let it prepare to cry and wail,” the head of Hezbollah's Executive Council, Hashem Safieddine, said on Wednesday, adding that Hezbollah operations against Israel “will increase in intensity, strength, quantity, and quality."

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-mu ... my-leaders

The BRICS weigh in on Palestine

The gravity around the newly-enlarged BRICS constellation is drawing in Arab, Muslim, and Global South adherents to the influential group's message on international law, Palestine, and halting forever wars.


Pepe Escobar

JUN 15, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

MOSCOW - Something of extraordinary magnitude happened in Moscow on 23 May. Bahrain's King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa personally asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to help organize a peace conference on Palestine, at which Russia would be the first non-Arab nation invited.

Al-Khalifa and Putin had two rounds of discussions - one of them closed - during which the main focus was always Palestine. The Bahraini monarch noted that in a rare show of unity, the Arab world had finally come together in agreement to end the war in Gaza. It was implied that Russia was subsequently chosen as the most reliable mediator to end the brutal conflict.

Bahrain – and the Arab League – recognize that the Russian position centers around what Putin had previously defined as the “UN formula”: an independent Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem.

That happens to be the position of the BRICS-10 nations and virtually the whole Global Majority. Crucially, it is also the common position of China and the Arab world, reaffirmed in Beijing only one week after the Russia-Bahrain meeting.

The problem is how to implement the “formula” when the US hegemon, Israel's unconditional ally, has a virtual stranglehold on the United Nations.

By 2020, as Tel Aviv was openly announcing the inevitable annexation of the West Bank, the Abraham Accords were smashing a major Arab taboo on openly supporting Israel, via the normalization agreements signed in Washington DC by Bahrain, the UAE, Morocco, and Sudan.

Nine months ago, Palestine was virtually isolated, and destined to extinction via quiet Israeli policies to incrementally force expulsion. But never underestimate the power of a genocide committed in broad daylight, on video. Today, the Russia-China strategic partnership, BRICS, and the Global Majority have been mobilized to enshrine Palestine as a sovereign state – faithful to the recent super-majority UN General Assembly vote to accept Palestine as a UN member.

It will be a long, winding, and thorny road that has the potential to split the world in two.

Lavrov lays it all out

The St. Petersburg forum last week offered three crucial messages to the Global Majority, focused around BRICS. The crux of the sessions may have been geoeconomics, but a now-unavoidable message of support to Palestine crept into the sidelines.

After a panel ostensibly debating the supply and demand of oil and gas, and which touched upon the principled role of Yemen in the Red Sea directed against the Gaza genocide, support for Palestine, amidst friendly smiles (but off the record), was emphatic from everyone - from OPEC secretary-general Haitham al-Ghais to the UAE’s Minister of Energy Suhail Mohamed al-Mazrouei.

Same on a Russia-Oman panel, coming from Minister of Commerce Qais bin Mohammed bin Moosa al-Yousef.

Earlier this week, the Palestine tragedy was addressed in detail – on points 34 and 35 – in the joint statement of the BRICS 10 Ministers of Foreign Affairs, who sat at the same table for the first time in Nizhny Novgorod, preparing for the extremely important annual BRICS summit next October in Kazan, under the Russian presidency. Three very important points were made there:

First, the Ministers “reaffirmed their rejection of any attempt aiming at forcefully displacing, expelling or transferring the Palestinian people from their land.” Second, they collectively “expressed serious concern at Israel’s continued blatant disregard of international law, the UN Charter, UN resolutions and Court orders.” And third, the ten foreign ministers:

“Reaffirmed their support for Palestine’s full membership in the United Nations and reiterated their unwavering commitment to the vision of the two-state solution based on international law including relevant UNSC and UNGA resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative that includes the establishment of a sovereign, independent and viable State of Palestine in line with internationally recognized borders of June 1967 with East Jerusalem as its capital living side by side in peace and security with Israel.”

This is BRICS speaking with one voice – including, crucially, representatives of major Muslim-majority states: Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE. and Egypt.

Then Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, at an expanded BRICS session defined as BRICS+/BRICS Outreach, offered extra, important, context.

“We held an intra-Palestinian meeting in Moscow. We did this repeatedly. The last time it was held in late February and early March of this year, all Palestinian factions, including Hamas and Fatah, were present. For the first time, an event of this kind ended with the adoption of a joint statement in which everyone, including Hamas, expressed their readiness to unite the Palestinian ranks on the basis of the platform of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Previously, it was not possible to achieve this.”

Lavrov explained why, for Russia, it is essential to restore Palestinian unity:

“Only a united Palestine can be a partner in negotiations aimed at achieving the maximum desired outcome. As long as the Palestinians are divided, this is unlikely to work. Now, without any Palestinians, they are beginning to think about what to do with the Gaza Strip next: either to establish some kind of protectorate of Arab countries, or to introduce some kind of peacekeeping force, or to artificially declare that these will be territories governed by the Palestinian National Authority. These are all initiatives that are imposed by external players.”

And that brings us to the kernel of the Russian position: “The most important component of our long-term policy in this area will be to support the movement for the creation of a Palestinian state in full compliance with UN resolutions.”

How to respond “symmetrically”

All of the above sums up the carefully calibrated, official Russian position. Moscow abhors Israel's non-stop, irrational escalation while ceasefire proposals are on hand galore. At the same time, it won’t take sides – either with Hamas or with Yemen's Ansarallah. It is a consensus diplomats and Russia analysts routinely express: Russia will not get into a war thousands of kilometers away when it is fighting a US/NATO existential threat right at its western border.

After Putin’s answers in the Q&A following his address to the plenary session in St. Petersburg, debate raged on what sort of “symmetrical” responses Russia's ministry of defense would come up with to counterpunch NATO’s green light for strikes with long-range missiles inside the Russian Federation.

West Asia, predictably, features in the favorite scenario: advanced strike weapons deployed in Syria, described as “Syrian weapons” to mirror the west's “Ukrainian weapons” subterfuge. These would supplement arms already deployed at Russia's Khmeimim and Tartus bases – covering the Eastern Mediterranean, Lebanon, Israel, and US bases in Jordan, occupied Syria and occupied Iraq - and would be operated by Russian personnel, much as US/NATO personnel operate "Ukrainian" weapons.

A BRICS thorn

Now we come to the thorn in the BRICS flower arrangement - Saudi Arabia.

A discombobulated White House and US Deep State seem to have found a formula to wean Riyadh away from its new role as strong BRICS player: a landmark defense treaty, dubbed the Strategic Alliance Agreement, in the wings awaiting Riyadh's formalization of relations with Tel Aviv.

The Strategic Alliance Agreement would need to get a two-thirds majority vote in the US Senate. Yet insistence on “normalization with Israel” may well kill the deal, as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman (MbS) now has options to carefully consider, not only regarding the Gaza tragedy, but over his new BRICS alliances.

Riyadh’s official position on Palestine is tied up with BRICS; end of the war/genocide in Gaza, and the establishment of a Palestinian state. And every grain of sand in the lands of Islam is fully aware that a Tel Aviv ruled by an ethnocentric mob of extremists won’t accept a two-state solution.

Moreover, a Saudi-US military alliance is totally incompatible with Riyadh becoming an influential member of BRICS. Chessboard moves are instead pointing to sooner or later a possible Global Majority military alliance to counterpunch the escalating US/NATO war - Hybrid and otherwise – against the dawning of a multinodal, polycentric, and in Putin’s terminology in St. Peterburg, “harmonic” multipolar world.

Add to it the expiration earlier this week of the US-Saudi agreement signed 50 years ago to establish the petrodollar, essentially in exchange for US military protection.

Already last year Riyadh made it clear the agreement would not be renewed when it clinched a deal with China based on energy trade using the petroyuan.

So in theory we are advancing further on down the road towards the demise of the petrodollar, coupled with the expansion of the digital yuan. The Central Bank of Saudi Arabia is now a “full participant” of Project mBridge, which unites the BIS Innovation Hub, the Central Bank of Thailand, the Central Bank of the UAE, the People's Bank of China, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

Essentially, mBridge is a multi-Central Bank digital currency (CBDC) platform shared among Central Banks and commercial banks, and enabling instant cross-border payments and settlement. Thailand, for instance, is buying oil from the UAE using mBridge.

There are no less than 26 mBridge observers – quite a mixed bag, including the China-led Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the European Central Bank, the IMF, and the World Bank.

As Saudi Arabia joins mBridge, Saudi Aramco - after opening itself to foreign investors with a huge IPO - has just ceded an extra 0.64 percent of its capital, with 60 percent of the buyers American. Aramco is a humongous fountain of dividends for shareholders: this year, that will amount to a whopping $141 billion.

Guess who are the top new investors? The Big Three – Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street - now all wallowing in Saudi oil.

Arabs, CENTCOM, and Israel: in bed together?

And now for the ultimate complicating factor.

On Monday, military officers from Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Jordan – which includes three BRICS members and Russia-friendly Bahrain - met with Herzi Halevi, the IDF’s Chief of General Staff to discuss…defense cooperation.

The meeting was facilitated by none other than the US CENTCOM. Although as low-profile as it gets, the meeting still leaked, given the juxtaposition of the Gaza genocide alongside a meeting of top Arab leaders sitting with the Arab world's worst enemies.

A post-modern epigone of the cynics dwelling in the Agora in Ancient Greece would remark that with CENTCOM Arab “friends” like these – three of them BRICS members - Palestine does not need enemies.

Meanwhile, the tragedy persists on so many levels. As Chinese high school students all across the civilization-state show their support for Palestine after taking their university entrance exams, the US-Israel axis homogenizes terrorism, linked to the debacle of Project Ukraine, coupled with the non-stop killing of Palestinians.

Everything is being sucked into the black hole of terrorism – complete with NATO now openly re-arming the neonazi Azov Battalion, and Kiev targeting civilians in Belgorod with drones and scattering mines in parks where kids play.

All the components of the Hegemon-fed Terror Foreign Legion are coming together, in lockstep with Israel, which is essentially ISIS with nuclear weapons. But for all their lofty ideals and sacred belief in the UN, the BRICS still have not come up with a solid, practical strategy to fight the horror.

https://thecradle.co/articles/the-brics ... -palestine

Israeli army in ‘urgent need’ of troops as resistance deals heavy losses

Israel has supported a draft bill to extend the retirement age of reservists due to 'high volumes' of soldier deaths in Gaza

News Desk

JUN 17, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg)

The Israeli army is facing significant difficulties in confronting the Palestinian resistance across the Gaza Strip, Hebrew news outlet Channel 12 reported on 16 June.

Hamas’ Qassam Brigades and other groups are “still waging war in the Gaza Strip, and are capable of harming Israeli army soldiers,” military sources told the outlet.

The sources added that in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah particularly, the army has not been able to eliminate the Qassam Brigades or its military capabilities, and that Tel Aviv may end the operation there without achieving its goals.

“Israeli hopes for the battle in Rafah are misleading the public … Hamas has succeeded in rebuilding itself in the Gaza Strip,” Israeli commentator on Palestinian affairs, Ohad Hamo, told Channel 12.

The Hebrew media report coincided with eleven funerals of Israeli army soldiers across Israel on Sunday, who were killed in battles with the resistance across Gaza.

Most of the funerals were for the eight Israeli soldiers who were burned alive inside a Namer armored vehicle that was struck by the resistance in Rafah on Saturday.

Hebrew media described the attack as the deadliest in Gaza since January.

Days earlier, on 10 June, the Qassam Brigades announced that several Israeli soldiers were killed after its fighters detonated a booby-trapped building in Rafah with troops inside.

As the fighting rages, Tel Aviv’s enlistment crisis continues to worsen.

An Israeli army radio correspondent, Doron Kadosh, reported on Monday that the military is setting up a new division for reservists over the retirement age of 40 in order to meet the “urgent need for more troops.”

The new division is in “advance stages” and will call on Israelis who were previously exempt from serving, according to Kadosh.

The Israeli government has also supported a draft bill aimed at extending the reservist retirement age despite opposition from the public.

Due to “a very high volume of deaths and injuries as a result of the war, the IDF still needs a significant amount of manpower,” the draft bill reads.

“The extension of the temporary order is required, at this stage, to allow the IDF to keep in service the reserve officers who cannot be replaced.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... avy-losses

Israeli army announces humanitarian 'tactical pause' in Gaza as attacks continue uninterrupted

The 'pause' announced by the army will not stop military operations or change the amount of humanitarian aid being allowed into Gaza

News Desk

JUN 16, 2024

Image
Trucks carrying humanitarian aid enter Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip after crossing the terminal border from Egypt, on January 17, 2024. (Photo credit: AFP)

The Israeli military claimed on 16 June that it would hold a daily "tactical pause of military activity" along a road in southern Gaza to enable more humanitarian aid to enter.

The BBC reported that the route of the ‘pause’ leads from the Kerem Shalom crossing on the Israel-Egypt-Gaza border to the Salah al-Din Road, the main north-south highway in Gaza, and then northwards to the European Hospital near the city of Khan Yunis.

The army said the pauses, which allegedly began on Saturday, will last from 08:00 until 19:00 local time until further notice.

However, the effect of the announced pauses is unclear, as most fighting in Gaza occurs at night.

Further, Israeli army spokesman Daniel Hagari confirmed that Israeli operations in southern Gaza will continue, and no changes will be made in the delivery of aid.

Hagari confirmed in a statement that there is no cessation of fighting in southern Gaza, that “the fighting in Rafah continues,” and “there is no change in the introduction of goods into the Gaza Strip. ”


The announcement of the tactical pause comes amid harsh criticism from international aid groups that Israel is starving Palestinians.

On Wednesday, World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said a significant proportion of Gaza's population was facing "catastrophic hunger and famine-like conditions."

The Israel army said Sunday's "tactical pause" announcement follows "additional related discussions with the UN and international organizations."

Israel began its assault on Rafah, the city on the Egypt-Gaza border, on 6 May.

Since then, the Rafah crossing, the main entry point for humanitarian aid, has been closed, and the number of trucks delivering aid to Gaza has decreased markedly.

The UN's humanitarian office, OCHA, reported that in May, the daily average number of trucks delivering humanitarian aid into Gaza was 97. In April, that figure was 169, and in March, it was 139.

OCHA points out that since 7 May, it has been unable to directly observe the arrival of aid from the private sector through the Kerem Shalom crossing.

Also on Sunday, Walla reported the Israeli army announced that forces of the 99th Division, under the command of Brigadier General Barak Hiram, have been working in recent days to expand the size of the "Netzarim Corridor" by destroying additional buildings. The Hebrew language news site said that Israeli forces in the corridor, which divides Gaza in two, are preventing displaced Palestinians from returning to their homes in the northern Gaza Strip, with an emphasis on Gaza City, thus creating public pressure on the Hamas leadership.

At the same time, resistance groups in Gaza, led by Hamas' Qassam Brigades, continue to put up stiff resistance to Israel's occupying forces.

The Israeli army released the names of ten soldiers killed in combat in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, including eight killed when their Namer armored vehicle was destroyed in an ambush by the Qassam Brigades in Rafah.

The other two were reservists killed in a Qassam Brigades operation that destroyed their tank.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... nterrupted

*******

The Question of Palestinian Statehood
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 16, 2024
Leila Farsakh

Image
Is partition the only path to self-determination?

Palestinians need to move beyond the mirage of the two-state solution.


The quest for Palestinian statehood has long been central to the Palestinian national struggle. In 1971 the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) declared the creation of a single democratic state in historic Palestine inclusive of Christians, Jews, and Muslims to be its goal and the only just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In 1988 it issued the Palestinian Declaration of Independence, which implied that the PLO accepted the two-state solution, just as its chairman, Yasser Arafat, officially recognized Israel. These developments paved the way to the Oslo peace process in 1993. By 2023, the State of Palestine was officially recognized by 139 of 193 member states of the United Nations, which admitted it as a nonmember state in 2012.

Of course, Palestine remains far from independent or sovereign, having suffered under Israeli occupation throughout this whole period. In the thirty years following the signing of the first Oslo Accords, Israel allowed the transfer of over 500,000 Israeli Jewish settlers to the occupied West Bank (including East Jerusalem), built more than half of a planned 712-kilometer separation wall around it, developed hundreds of checkpoints and roadblocks that fragment Palestinian areas into separate population reserves, and launched five wars against the Gaza Strip, which it has kept under siege for over seventeen years. Already in 1999, Edward Said concluded, “the problem is that Palestinian self-determination in a separate state is unworkable.” The internationally endorsed two-state solution—indeed the prospects for any viable Palestinian state—were thus undermined even before the brutal attacks of October 7 on Israeli civilians and military personnel.

The ever-growing toll of Israel’s ensuing genocidal war on Gaza has only reinforced judgments that the quest for Palestinian statehood has become futile. The failed April 2024 UN Security Council vote on admitting the State of Palestine into the UN as a full member shows the intransigence of Israeli and U.S. objections. As the number of Palestinians killed continues to rise—as of this writing, more than 34,000 have died, while more than 1.7 million have been displaced and much of the population faces the risk of famine—it has become clear that Palestinians need to move beyond the mirage of the two-state solution.

Even before this war, Palestinians have been grappling with the failure of the two-state solution, forcing them to reassess the relationship between statehood and self-determination and imagine a political resolution that goes beyond partition. The war has compelled them to rethink what political liberation might look like and how to articulate an alternative to the present impasse—one that is democratic, viable, and capable of protecting the equal political rights of Palestinians and Jewish Israelis.

Ever since Palestinians were expelled from their land during the 1948 war, they have sought to fulfill their UN-enshrined right of return. The establishment of the PLO by the Arab League in 1964 reaffirmed this right, but its charter did not specify statehood as part of its mission of liberating Palestine from Zionist colonialism. Only with the ascendance of guerrilla groups into the executive committee of the PLO in the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day War did the Palestinian national movement tie return with self-determination and political liberation with statehood. The Palestinian struggle for self-determination, however, always carried a certain ambiguity about the relationship between national liberation and statehood.

In this regard, the Palestinian national movement was not much different from most anticolonial liberation movements of the twentieth century. The concept of self-determination, internationalized with Vladimir Lenin’s defense of people’s right to national independence and reframed by Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points in 1918, laid the foundation of a world order composed of nation-states; by 1960 it had become the juridical basis for all national quests for political independence from colonial domination. UN Resolution 1514, adopted that year by the UN General Assembly (UNGA), affirmed self-determination as a fundamental human right. It also declared colonialism a “denial of fundamental human rights” and specified that “all people have an inalienable right to complete freedom, the exercise of their sovereignty and the integrity of their national territory.” It thus made self-determination synonymous with national territorial sovereignty—that is, with statehood. An international consensus had thereby been formed around the necessity of independent statehood as a first, if not sufficient, step toward political liberation.

But not all anticolonialists agreed. Many considered the right to self-determination as a people’s right to define their political future and choose their own political system of government. They maintained that sovereignty is enshrined above all in the people, or nation, rather than in a territorially bound state per se. These antcolonialists understood the pursuit of self-determination as part of a larger project of remaking the world beyond the Westphalian order of sovereign nation-states. They were aware of what revolutionaries from Toussaint Louverture to Frantz Fanon have warned against: that national independence does not guarantee liberation, for it can create new forms of domination.

In the case of Palestinian statehood, the defining moment of 1971 came when the eighth Palestinian National Council (PNC) convention adopted a unanimous resolution calling for “a democratic Palestinian state” that would be set up “in a Palestine liberated from Zionist imperialism,” where “all who wish to do so can live in peace with the same rights and obligations.” The convention made clear that “Palestinian armed struggle is not a racist or sectarian struggle against the Jews.”

Nationalists were clear about opposing Zionism as a project of domination rather than rejecting Jews for their identity.
This vision emerged in the face of international denial of the Palestinian question—best exemplified in UN Security Council Resolution 242 of 1967, which acknowledged the right of each state in the region to “live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries” but did not refer to the Palestinians by name. It simply referred to them as refugees in need of a humanitarian solution, thereby denying their national political character as a people with a right to self-determination.


The PLO’s state project was thus as much a matter of national self-affirmation as of political actualization. It aimed to assert Palestinian peoplehood, which Zionism sought to eradicate, as much as to articulate a decolonial political future inclusive of all those who live on the land. While many doubted the sincerity of this inclusive vision—and Israel outright rejected it—Palestinian nationalists were clear about opposing Zionism as a racial colonial project of domination rather than rejecting Jews for their identity.

The PLO’s diplomatic and legal efforts in this regard came to fruition in 1974 with UNGA Resolution 3236, which affirmed the legitimacy of Palestinian anticolonial struggle and right to “national independence and sovereignty.” The UN national assembly then also recognized the PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people and invited it to participate in the work of the General Assembly like any non–member state, such as the Vatican. Meanwhile, the PLO continued to act as a state in exile, with its various political institutions, electoral structures, and economic services, representing and providing for Palestinians in the diaspora as well as for those under Israeli occupation. In 1974 the PNC’s twelfth session adopted the Ten Point Program, which specified that the PLO would employ all means “for the liberation of Palestinian land and setting up a patriotic, independent national authority on every part of the Palestine territory that will be liberated” as part of its strategy for the establishment of a democratic Palestinian state.

The adoption of this program meant that the PLO effectively gave up on the idea of remaking the regional and international order of nation-states. It implicitly admitted the international consensus on the partition of Palestine and the framework for peace outlined in UN Resolution 242. Although many Palestinians contested the possibility of a Palestinian state without dismantling Zionism first, the majority accepted that national independence was a first step toward national liberation, even if the content and shape of this state—as well as the extent to which its creation would be the means to, or the end of, decolonization—remained contested.

Linking self-determination with statehood thus gave the Palestinian liberation struggle a concrete political meaning in an international system that bestowed on states the primary responsibility of representing and protecting the human and political rights of citizens. This view gained strength after Israel’s war against the PLO in Lebanon in 1982 and the failure of Arab states to come to the rescue of the Palestinians. The PLO’s Declaration of Independence in 1988, announced after the outbreak of the First Intifada, represented the official Palestinian acceptance that national self-determination could only be fulfilled on part of historic Palestine—and that it would be attainable by negotiating with, rather than defeating, Israel.

This Palestinian vision of statehood, and its acceptance of the two-state solution, thus became the price of the Palestinian historical compromise with Israel: it was the only way for Palestinians to advocate for themselves at peace negotiations where UNSC Resolution 242 set the terms of any possible resolution to the conflict. A Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza, i.e. on only 22 percent of Palestine, was considered better than no state because it promised political independence and would allow a means for the return of refugees, even if it could not restore justice to the Palestinians for the Nakba. Above all, it promised citizenship rights. In other words, the Palestinian state project affirmed the Palestinian “right to have rights,” which, as Hannah Arendt explained, is the rationale for, and responsibility of, any claim for statehood.

For the PLO leadership, the Oslo peace process in 1993 provided an opportunity to territorialize these dreams of Palestinian statehood. With the signing of the Declaration of Principles in 1993 and Interim Agreement on the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1995, the PLO acquiesced to a conflict resolution approach intrinsically tied to territorial partition as a paradigm for achieving a minimum of Palestinian rights. It also accepted Israel’s insistence that the starting point of the conflict was the 1967 war, not the 1948 war. Although fully aware that the Oslo process did not end the occupation or specify as its end goal the creation of a Palestinian state, the Palestinian leadership remained committed to proving that Palestinian statehood was both necessary and achievable.

Starting with Arafat’s return from Tunis to Gaza in 1994 and his role as the head of a democratically elected Palestinian National Authority (PNA) in January 1996, the Palestinian official narrative thus shifted from decolonization to state-building. The PNA focused on behaving as a state in order to be recognized as one, embarking on a wide variety of activities that ranged from setting up a new police force and various ministries to devising national development strategies and ritualizing presidential salutes while receiving foreign ambassadors. Such performances of statehood sought to abstract the reality of occupation, not so much in order to deny it but to refuse to be constrained by it. They were attempts, however limited, to affirm Palestinian agency and legitimate national existence despite Israel’s continuous obstructions.

The acceptance of the two-state solution became the price of the Palestinian compromise with Israel.

The PNA’s belief that national independence was attainable through state-building rather than revolutionary armed resistance was best exemplified by the Fayyad technocratic government in 2007. Set up in the aftermath of the international boycott of Hamas’s electoral victory in 2006 and the Fatah-Hamas debacle in June 2007, this government defined its mission as providing “the final push to statehood.” It worked on proving Palestinian institutional readiness for independent statehood, as advised by PNA’s new international sponsors, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

State-building thus became about law and order, not about national unity or democratic representation. It confined the meaning of self-determination to the establishment of a neoliberal state, as defined by Washington’s conception of good governance. Its mission was to foster “institution-building” and fiscal transparency in order to ensure the development of a vibrant private sector. It established a kind of statehood that was not sovereign but responsible for the management of Palestinian populations under its control and entitled to political independence in a distant and uncertain future.

Even more assiduously, since 2008 this state-building effort proved to be a site of governance and control—an effort by which the PNA shaped power relations over space and people, rather than a strategy that could effectively halt Israeli settlement construction or end the siege on Gaza. This control was visible at the macro level in the creation of a repressive police force and prison system in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and in the failure to create independent and transparent judiciary. It also was clear at the micro level in the way state-building efforts reshaped access to resources and power, whether in developing the infrastructure for a modern electricity grid and road system or defining the terms of public-private partnerships. Meanwhile, the PNA was unable to challenge the settler colonial reality its state project was embedded in, given that it remained responsible for safeguarding Israeli security. The failure of regional and international powers to exert pressure on Israel to retreat fully from the West Bank and Gaza—or even to adhere to the terms of the Oslo agreements—meant that the Palestinian state was going to be neither independent nor democratic.

State-building became about law and order, not about national unity or democratic representation.

Indeed, it is impossible to explain the persistence (and failure) of the Palestinian state project without considering the international investment in it. The Quartet on the Middle East—comprising the UN, European Union, United States, and Russia—has been the major advisor and funder of the Palestinian state project, delivering over $44 billion to the Palestinian territories since 1994. Apart from disbursing some of this money into humanitarian aid, the international community focused on improving the PNA’s institutional capability to prove Palestinian readiness for political independence, giving special attention to enhancing the PNA’s monopoly over the use of violence in the West Bank and Gaza.

The meaning of statehood has thus been restricted to the power of an internationally recognized authority to impose law and order—crowding out goals such as fostering democratic accountability or ensuring Palestinian unity, let alone adhering to international law or forcing Israel to withdraw from Palestinian land. And by prioritizing Israel’s security concerns in delineating the extent of Palestinian territorial and demographic jurisdiction, the international community has largely ignored the importance of territorial contiguity for the viability of any Palestinian state.

The cumulative effect of these developments of the past thirty years has been to transform the Palestinian state project from a vehicle for national liberation into an effort to dissolve the Palestine question altogether. Juridically, Oslo confined the Palestinian nation to the West Bank and Gaza Strip, compromising the unity of the Palestinian people and the political rights of Palestinian refugees abroad. It also undermined the national Palestinian political system with the creation of new territorially truncated political bodies: the PNA and the Palestinian Legislative Council effectively superseded the PLO and its Palestinian National Council, which had historically represented Palestinians both inside and outside the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The Palestinian project of national self-determination has thus been emptied of emancipatory potential. It was not in vain, however, for it fulfilled an important historical role, serving as the vehicle for affirming Palestinian political existence as a national group with a right to political independence. It helped win legitimacy for the Palestinian struggle of self-determination in the eyes of the international community, which has admitted the State of Palestine into multiple international institutions since 2011. But it proved to be insufficient for political and territorial liberation because it remained confined within a partition paradigm that did not stop, let alone undo, Israeli settler colonialism.

Israel’s latest war on Gaza has not only confirmed the reality of Israel’s effective sovereignty over Palestine—a reality that has been increasingly described as apartheid. It has also revealed the brutal dimensions of this condition. Palestinians in the Gaza Strip are subjected to carpet bombing and to the annihilation of their educational, health, and housing infrastructure while enduring displacement and famine. Those in the West Bank, meanwhile, continue to live in fragmented population reserves pervaded by Israeli checkpoints while facing mounting settler violence and military incursions; as of this writing, more than 500 have been killed, and thousands have been taken into Israeli custody, since October 8.

Decolonizing Israel is going to be central to any discussion of the one-state solution.

Israel’s latest war on the Palestinians clearly indicates that the conflict has entered a new phase, even if its settler colonial character has not changed. The premise upon which the conflict has been managed for the past thirty years has been shaken, as Israel can no longer rely on the claim that the conflict is confined to the land occupied in the 1967 war and that a resolution can be achieved through a peace process, or a partition paradigm, that does not end Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land. The more foundational question posed in 1948, if not before, has resurfaced and demands still an answer: Who has political rights in the land between the river and the sea, and how are these rights going to be exercised and protected? Can this land accommodate two national groups, and if so, under what political configuration?

Many Palestinian activists and academics have sought to address these questions long before the events of October 7. Over the past two decades, in particular, many have sought to redefine the meaning of political liberation in the wake of the maimed project of a Palestinian nation-state. This alternative discourse identifies settler colonialism, rather than occupation, as the impediment to political independence—and thus views decolonization, rather than partition, as the required path to peace.

One aspect of this work has entailed appeals to Palestinians’ inalienable rights. This rights-based approach gained prominence with the rise of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement and the 2004 opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) declaring Israel’s separation wall to be illegal. This approach sees in international law a potent tool for holding Israel accountable to its international obligations—as most recently manifested in South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the ICJ. It emphasizes the unity of Palestinian rights, including the right of return, freedom from occupation in the West Bank and Gaza, and the right to equal citizenship for the Palestinians living inside Israel. The BDS movement, meanwhile, has been particularly effective in mobilizing support for new strategies of nonviolent resistance and generating growing international solidarity with Palestinians at the grassroots level and in different policy circles (including academia, local governments, unions, and churches).

The rights-based approach, however, stops short of offering a comprehensive political strategy—one capable of uniting the Palestinian body politic with a viable political alternative to the stalled two-state solution. Proposals to that effect have taken two broad forms.

The first rejects the very idea of a Palestinian state as a political aspiration. It considers the state a site of inherent violence and thus bound to be oppressive, especially in the absence of a free and active civil society. It emphasizes that sovereignty lies with the people, not with the state, and highlights that globalization has undermined the importance of territorial sovereignty. Politically, this approach affirms the political agency of the Palestinians everywhere, not just in the Occupied Territories. It embraces the fragmented and exilic Palestinian experience while providing a resounding rejection of the PNA’s attempt to monopolize the Palestinian “we.”

The second approach is more skeptical about the possibility of transcending the state as a political project, given that it remains the sovereign guarantor of rights and security. Advocates of this approach seek rather to redefine the content of the state project by rejecting ethnonationalism and deterritorializing the fulfillment of the right to self-determination. They argue that a democratic one-state solution is the only means to decolonize the ongoing apartheid reality. There is no consensus, however, on whether such a state should be a liberal democratic state or a binational one, largely because there is no agreement on how to accommodate the political rights of Jewish Israelis in a decolonized political entity. Binationalists maintain that the collective rights of Jewish citizens would be recognized as equal, not superior, to Palestinian collective rights in a future democratic state. Others argue that a decolonized polity can only protect Jewish individual rights as citizens but not their Zionist national identity, since Zionism is a settler colonial project premised on the destruction of the Palestinians.

Israel’s present genocidal onslaught on Gaza has given further credence to this line of argument. Decolonizing Israel, and thus Zionism, is going to be central to any discussion of the one-state solution. Voices calling for it are growing within the Jewish community in the United States and elsewhere and within a new generation of students and activists leading international protests in support of Palestinian rights worldwide. According to Said, it falls on the Palestinians, as unfair as this might sound, to show the way toward liberation, since “no people, for bad or for good, is so freighted with multiple, and yet unreachable or indigestible, significance as the Palestinians. . . . Their relationship to Zionism, and ultimately to political and spiritual Judaism, gives them a formidable burden as interlocutors of the Jews.” This war has made it clear that they cannot, and should not, carry this burden alone.

This essay is adapted from Rethinking Statehood in Palestine: Self-Determination and Decolonization Beyond Partition, edited by Leila Farsakh and published in an open access edition by University of California Press in 2021.

Leila Farsakh is Professor of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts Boston and author of Palestinian Labour Migration to Israel: Labour, Land, and Occupation.


https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... statehood/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Jun 18, 2024 11:04 am

AS`AD AbuKHALIL: The Yasser Arafat Era Is Over
June 17, 2024
Save
Oct. 7 was a watershed event for Arab politics with the emergence of a force that engages militarily with Israel on the Palestinians’ behalf. The era of Yasser Arafat is over.

Image
Free Palestine demonstration at the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C., Dec. 5, 2023. (Diane Krauthamer, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

By As`ad AbuKhalil
Special to Consortium News

Like him or hate him, it is the age of Yahya Sinwar in Arab politics. One cannot think of any person who rivals the Hamas commander’s stature and status among the people of the region.

Oct. 7, was a watershed event in the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict. It changed the nature of the conflict, in terms of the emergence of an Arab front that rallies behind the Palestinians and engages in military battle with Israel on their behalf.

It also propelled a new Palestinian leadership that for the first time has categorically broken with the era of Yasser Arafat.

Arafat (largely with Gulf support due to fears of the radical alternative of George Habash) dominated Palestinian politics from 1968, in the wake of the battle of Karamah, until many years after his assassination by Israel in 2004.

Arafat’s footprint still remains in the corruption and incompetence of the Fatah movement and the collaborationist regime in Ramallah. Arafat was the one who, at the behest of the Clinton administration, basically abandoned armed struggle and for all intents and purposes dissolved the Palestine Liberation Organization or transformed it into a mere tool of the Israeli occupation.

Arafat even took dictates from the State Department to change the charter of the PLO which was drafted in 1964 and amended in 1968.

Arafat abandoned liberation in return for vague promises about future statehood in an undetermined piece of land within 22 percent of historic Palestine, and under the watchful eyes of the military occupation.

Arafat made peace with the enemy before he extracted any meaningful concession from them; he merely relied on the vague promises of U.S. administrations.

The Opposite of Arafat

Image
Sinwar, commander of Hamas, in the Gaza Strip, shaking hands with a soldier in December 2023. (Fars Media Corporation, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

Sinwar is the opposite of Arafat: Arafat was bombastic, Sinwar is non-theatrical, and low key; where Arafat was prone to exaggeration, Sinwar is more precise in rhetoric.

Arafat had absolutely no military background except what he fabricated about his escapades in Jordan and elsewhere. Sinwar dirtied his own hands — so to speak — in battle not only against Israeli soldiers but also against collaborators and Israeli spies planted within the population in Gaza.

Where Arafat was loud and impulsive, Sinwar is quiet and thoughtful. Where Arafat was prone to compromises and making free concessions, Sinwar in the period since Oct. 7 has proven to be one of the toughest and shrewdest negotiators in the history of the conflict.

Anybody who read the ceasefire proposal that was presented by Hamas to Israel through intermediaries realizes that there are new Palestinian leaders and that the Fatah movement has been totally discredited and abandoned by its people.

Arafat never seriously studied Israeli politics and society. In fact he relied for his knowledge of the enemy on none other than Mahmoud Abbas, the Holocaust denier, to explain Israeli politics to him. Abbas, the current Fatah leader and president of the Palestinian National Authority, was the in-house expert on Israel within the Fatah movement during Arafat’s time.

(When Abbas completed his PhD in Moscow, dealing with Zionism, he submitted it for publication to the Institute of Palestine Studies. The founder and founding director of the institute, Professor Walid Khalidi, told me recently that he refused to publish the dissertation due to its blatant anti-Semitism).

Arafat, as former U.S. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski said about him, was never serious about either fighting or diplomacy; and he miserably failed in both.

Image
Arafat addressing U.N, Commission on Human Rights in Geneva, Feb. 19, 1988. (U.N. Photo)

Sinwar has thus far proven himself to be a tough fighter and tough negotiator and for that he has commanded, and will command, if he survives, the respect of Palestinians and many Arabs.

Even a Western-friendly polling firm published findings that show that Hamas and Sinwar are far more popular than Abbas and the Fatah Movement.

It is noteworthy that there haven’t been any public opinion surveys published since Oct. 7 to measure the popularity of Sinwar among the Arabs, but anecdotal and social media evidence indicate that his revolutionary status is rising in the eyes of Palestinians and many Arabs.

The PLO had corrupt leaders such as the pro-Syrian Zuhayr Muhsin who was assassinated in Cannes, France, in 1979, and Abu Az-Za`im of Fatah, whose wild parties in Beirut were legendary.

Sinwar, by contrast, lived among his people and ate with them and spent time in prison with them. It is in prison that Sinwar learned Hebrew and developed a deep knowledge and understanding of Israeli politics and society.

Sinwar is the only Palestinian leader I have seen who carried a revolver equipped with a silencer and it is because he has used it; his revolver is not there for show or symbolism as was the case of Arafat.

Sinwar was imprisoned by Israelis, and served a long sentence before he was freed in a prisoner exchange, not for murder of Israelis but for his chasing and hunting down of Israeli spies and infiltrators, collaborators and terrorists. The security shield within Gaza was engineered by Sinwar.

Image
Sayed Abbas Al Mussawi, co-founder and secretary general of Hezbollah, 1952-1992. (Tasnim News Agency, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

Sinwar’s survival is questionable in this ongoing war. It is clear that Israel will do its utmost to kill him.

Of course, the notion that you can finish off a movement by killing its leader has proven its futility over and over again in the history of this conflict.

In 1992, Israel killed the then leader of Hezbollah, Abbas Mussawi, along with his wife and child, in the hope of finishing off Hezbollah. Instead, Israel got Hassan Nasrallah as the new formidable leader of Hezbollah.

Sinwar took over the Hamas movement before Oct. 7. The Doha, Qatar, branch of Hamas, led by Khalid Mishal, has lost much credibility by virtue of its close association with the Muslim Brotherhood movement, and with Turkey and Qatar.

Mishal also miscalculated when he expected the downfall of the Syrian regime in 2011 and threw in his lot with a Syrian armed uprising, supported by a Gulf-Western coalition.

After many years enjoying shelter in Damascus, Mishal thought a new regime would emerge that would be even more supportive of Hamas. But when the Syrian regime survived, Mishal became an obstacle in reconciling the movement with Syria, and with the axis of resistance.

In fact, top Hezbollah officials in the wake of Oct. 7 refused to meet with Mishal because they view him as having spoiled the relationship between Hezbollah and Hamas in 2011 and afterwards.

Image
Hamas leader Khaled Mashaal, speaking with journalists in 2009. (Trango, Wikimedia Commons, CC by 3.0)

Sinwar headed the faction within Hamas that called for closer coordination with Iran and with Hezbollah, and which stressed the military option over diplomatic maneuvering. Mishal was mimicking the path of Arafat but with less political and maneuvering skills than the latter.

Each era in Palestinian history produces its own movements and its own leaders. The era of Oslo and the wide disillusionment by the Palestinian people of the consequences of Arafat’s historic, ostensible peace with Israel, led to a new version of Hamas that broke off from the history of the Fatah movement.

How Sinwar Will Be Judged

Image
Hamas rocket attack from Gaza into Israel, Oct. 7, 2023. (Tasnim News Agency, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

No. 1) his ability to mobilize the military forces under his command and to forge an effective military response to Israeli occupation, regardless of how the military operation of Hamas is judged in the West.

The early period of Hamas witnessed the wide-scale use of devastating car bombs in the 1990s which generated negative responses even among the Palestinian people; many Arabs came to reject them as a tool of warfare. (Zionist gangs in Palestine introduced car bombs into the Arab-Israeli conflict by the bombing of the King David hotel in 1946 ).

The Al Aqsa Deluge attack of Oct. 7 will be judged and evaluated and Hamas will have to explain some aspects of it. The official document that Hamas released months after the attack entertained the possibility of an international, impartial investigation of all aspects of the violence of Oct. 7.

[See: AS`AD AbuKHALIL: Hamas’ Official Account]

No. 2) Sinwar will be judged on his management of the ceasefire negotiations over the last few months and thus far he has proven himself to be the toughest and shrewdest negotiator that the Arabs have seen in the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Unlike Arafat, he has also withstood the bullying of Arab despots who have often, historically, placed pressure on the Palestinian national leadership at the behest of the Western alliance. He has done this while in hiding, possibly underground.

Thus far Sinwar has been categorical in not compromising on his demand for the protection of the Palestinian people, while not negotiating the plight of Hamas’ leadership, for which he has asked no guarantees.

Arafat’s PLO in 1982 made the issue of Palestinian leadership and demands for guarantees for its safety its top priority. This explains how Palestinian refugee camps of Lebanon were left behind only to be massacred in Sabra and Shatila by Israel and its militias a few weeks after the departure of PLO forces from Lebanon in September 1982.

Sinwar will dominate Palestinian and Arab politics if he survives, and his legacy will shape the future of Palestinian action for years to come if he dies.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/06/17/a ... a-is-over/

********

Censored! Press TV discussion today of UNRWA’s report that 50,000 children across the Gaza strip are suffering from acute malnutrition

This morning’s 10 minute live on-air chat with the Press TV anchor in Teheran and with a scholar based in Morocco was dedicated to the latest report of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees describing the humanitarian situation in Gaza as catastrophic.

Regrettably Belgium appears to have banned dissemination of the Press TV website (again) and I am unable to view the video. Perhaps readers in different jurisdictions will have better luck.

See https://www.urmedium.net/c/presstv/129847

In any case, I use this platform to repeat my points in the video, which I directed in particular at Russian officials who monitor closely what is being said in Iran. My point was that lamentations and expressions of outrage over the genocide Israel is perpetrating in Gaza are presently a woefully insufficient response.

The time for action has arrived and I advanced one possible course of action, namely for countries with the determination to put an end to the suffering and death of innocent children come together and take a page from the American foreign and military policy playbook, forming a Coalition of the Willing to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza by force.

I find it understandable that Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and other neighboring states do not by themselves take military action against Israel even in the very limited sense of ensuring that humanitarian aid reaches the Gazans in amounts to stave off famine. Each country individually would expose itself to devastating Israeli revenge attacks that would cost the lives of their citizens and cause great material damage. However, if there is a collective force, say, to open Haifa port to ships with aid or to open the land border crossings, that would be an entirely different matter. And for this I can think of no country better placed to play a leading role than Russia, which happens to have its own naval base and air base in Syria as well as other military assets in the region.

There are, of course, many open issues raised by this proposal, some of which were mentioned by my fellow panelist. However, he also noted that if European and NATO countries like Norway and Spain that have formally recognized the Palestinian state were to join the coalition, it would have still greater likelihood of success in the face of not only Israeli but also American opposition.

The other topic raised by Press TV today was why Europe looks on with indifference at the Israeli war crimes and general inhumanity displayed by the Netanyahu government. My simple answer is the “Never Again” slogan, the reference to the slaughter of 6 million Jews in Europe during the Holocaust, for which European leaders, and Germans above all, feel collective guilt to this day. Regrettably this has deprived them of reason amidst the Israeli atrocities in Gaza. And what the Israeli government is doing is a tragedy not only for their victims but for themselves. They are desecrating the memory of the Holocaust dead and it will take more than one generation to live down these crimes against humanity.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2024

Postscript, 17.06.24: A reader has kindly sent in the following link to yesterday’s Press TV show which is accessible, as well as the full transcript which follows:

https://odysee.com/2024-06-16-PressTV—K ... Doctorow:f

Transcript below by a reader

PressTV 0:07
And I welcome everyone to Press TV’s news review program, where we get in-depth in one of the day’s top stories. And now today in review, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA says over 50,000 children across the Gaza Strip are suffering from acute malnutrition. UNRWA described the humanitarian situation as catastrophic, adding Gazans are now facing desperate levels of hunger due to the Israeli blockade. UN children’s agency UNICEF also said the children of Gaza are living in constant terror due to Israeli bombardment. UNICEF said Israeli forced displacement of Gazans in Rafah has caused agency to lose track of over 3,000 children. It added the humanitarian conditions and the suffering of citizens in Gaza is worsening by the day, due to the continuous blockade by Israeli forces.

1:00
And joining us for our program now forward is Dr. Kevin Barrett, editor at “Veterans Today”, joining us at Saidia, Morocco; and Gilbert Doctorow, independent international affairs analyst, joining us out of Brussels. Gentlemen, I’d like to welcome you both to the program. Dr. Barrett, we’ll start with you. Hope you’re doing well out there in Morocco. Your thoughts about the regime continuing to block all humanitarian aid from getting into Gaza, and that’s impacting the development of vulnerable small children?

Dr Kevin Barrett 1:31
Well, the genocidal Zionist regime is deliberately starving children of Palestine, and they’re admitting this. They’re not even trying to hide it. Numerous Israeli leaders have spoken about, made clearly genocidal statements, such as these statements about how the children who survived when we “mowed the lawn” in 2008 or 2014 are the same people who then grew up to support Hamas and so on. So we really should have just killed all the children back then, and by implication, we should kill them now. The top rabbi in Israel has basically said this, as have a number of the other Israeli leaders. So they’re not even hiding the fact that they’re deliberately slaughtering, torturing, and maiming children as national policy.

2:21
And the fact that this is allowed to happen in today’s world is astonishing. Right now we’re celebrating Eid al-Adha in the Islamic world, which is the celebration of the end of human sacrifice, and specifically the end of sacrificing children. That was a common practice in the ancient Mediterranean, among the Venetian Carthaginian culture particularly, but others as well. And when God told people to stop sacrificing their children, that was a momentous step forward for civilization. But apparently we’re going back to the era of the sacrifice of children as this bizarre, psychotic, millenary and messianic, genocidal cult of satanic so-called Jews, really Zionists in occupied Palestine, is sacrificing children by the tens of thousands.

3:16
And the low estimate of the number of children murdered so far is somewhere in the neighborhood of the 15, 16, 17,000 children. The reality is much higher, of course, as so many children have been lost track of, as we’ve heard, are buried beneath the rubble where they’ve died very slowly and painfully in horrible anguish, due to the Zionists deliberately dropping their buildings on top of them. So this is, it’s completely disgusting and unacceptable that the world is allowing this to continue.

Press TV: 3:43
Thank you, Dr. Barrett. And Gilbert Doctorow, welcome to the conversation, sir, and welcome to the program. Mr. Doctorow, I mean, the Israeli regime has the bigger guns, the tanks, the bigger bombs, the helicopters and fighter jets, far superior firepower. Why do you need to pick as your main victim the women and hungry children of Gaza?

Gilbert Doctorow, PhD 4:06
Well, I add my voice of outrage to what Israel is doing in Gaza. This genocide is unacceptable, but who is acting against it? And I would like to use this opportunity that you have given me the microphone to suggest a way out of this. The way out is to follow a page from the American playbook, it’s called “form a coalition of the willing”. It is clear for understandable reasons that Iran, Saudi Arabia, and other neighbors of Israel are reluctant to enter into a military confrontation with Israel because they know very well that this will be very damaging to their own populations and many people will die in a valiant effort that may or may not succeed.

4:52
It is a different situation if it’s not one country or two countries that go up against has blockade of Israel, but a coalition of nations. And I would propose, insofar as I am well aware that Russian officials follow your Press TV, I make a proposal to them that they lead this coalition. The ability of the Russians who are based in, have naval base in Syria, and who are present in the region is large. The Israelis will not go to war with Russia if Russia heads a coalition to break the blockade.

I didn’t say to break the Israeli army. No, to break the blockade for humanitarian grounds. That will be morally acceptable, and if it is not one nation [sound breakup]

PressTV 5:52
Thank you, Mr. Doctorow. We’re kind of having a loose connection toward the end of your words there, but hopefully that will get resolved. Dr. Barrett, a lot of people say that’s exactly what the Israeli regime wants. It wants to see a coalition on the other side with opposition to the atrocities that’s committing in Gaza. It wants to see regional powers get involved, so the U.S. gets involved, so Berlin and London. So basically, a world war erupts to try to protect the starving children of Gaza. Is that really what it’s going to take?

Barrett: 6:25
Well, that seems to be what Netanyahu and his camp are working for. Netanyahu has been trying to unleash a big war in the region, and a potential world war, in order to create the fog of war under which he could finish the genocide of the Palestinians. And he’s been trying to do this since, well, really for his whole political career, which began by creating the so-called War on Terror at the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism in 1979, where he summoned a number of top US leaders and set out the agenda, which was that post-Cold War, they would transition to a so-called War on Terror, which would really be a war by the West against Israel’s enemies. And so Netanyahu was then involved in the public relations launch for this on September 11, 2001. 9-11 was an Israeli job. And since then, Netanyahu and his faction has been pushing for a world war, trying to drag the Americans into a big war. Again, that’s the way that he thinks he could finish the genocide of Palestine.

7:32
And that is a pretty horrific prospect. As for to what extent does that limit the military options against the Zionist entity, I’m not sure that, again, yes, if we were talking about trying to bring a coalition of the willing into outright war with the Zionist entity that could easily spin off into a World War III. But a blocking effort, if it were the right coalition of nations– that would have to include not just Russia and its allies, but also countries like Turkey, and maybe even Saudi Arabia– that is a kind of a bridge- building exercise across the contours of the current system of alliances that we’re seeing as we see the U.S. imperial occupied Zionist world on one side and this emerging independent BRICS world on the other.

8:26
If you had a coalition that included members of both, if you could get Norway and Spain and these other– Ireland and pro-Palestinian NATO countries on the side of sending military forces to break the blockade along with Russia and Turkey and Saudi Arabia, with countries like Iran in a secondary role, that actually might have a chance of succeeding. But of course, the question is who’s going to bail the cat? Who has the courage to actually stand up against these monstrous forces? But at some point, we need that courage if we’re going to stop this mass slaughter of children. So I think this is an idea that should be explored.

Press TV: 9:00
Thank you. And final thoughts with you, Mr. Gilbert Doctorow there. Why are Western leaders so, I mean, obviously, they’ve all said time and again, nothing justifies the collective punishment taking place, the endless war crimes and atrocities being committed, especially against the children of Gaza, why are they not doing more to put a stop to it, to feed the children throughout this onslaught campaign?

Doctorow: 9:26
The answer is “Never again.” The unfortunate aspect of everything that has proceeded since October of last year is that European nations, and Germany in particular as a leader in this, have a collective guilt for the awful things they did to the Jewish people before and during World War II. And for that reason, “Never again” is the slogan that justifies, they think, the ongoing genocide that Israel is committing in Gaza. That has to be broken. Unfortunately for the Jewish people, for the Israeli population, they have destroyed their moral authority, and they have desecrated the memory of the six million people who died in the Holocaust.

10:13
That is a tragedy that will take them several generations to live down. But we have to begin with remedying the situation today. And I totally concur with my fellow panelist that a broader coalition that takes in some NATO members who have recognized Palestine would be ideal. I was not suggesting at any point that they all march in and try to defeat the Israeli army. That would be a very good formula for the start of World War III. But a more modest, limited, and urgent effort to break the blockade, I think that will work.

Press TV: 10:52
And you know, I was going to sign off, but I really want to get Dr. Barrett’s take on that. And that’s a powerful argument that Mr. Doctorow is making, that somehow giving Israel, the West giving Israel this carte blanche to do what it wants in Gaza, it’s pathetic to think, but I’m sure some Western leaders feel it’s some kind of reparation for the Holocaust.

Barrett: 11:15
It’s become the new religion, it’s replaced Christianity, the gas chambers are the crucifixion, Israel is the resurrection, and so on. And so it’s a new de facto religion in the West. And I personally think that that’s the product of the Zionist propaganda machine that dominates Western media, rather than the historical reality in which I think that the conflict between Jews and non-Jews throughout all of history has not been one of spotless victims on one side and evil perpetrators on the other. It’s been a mixed bag. And if anything, I think the Jewish people have been more sinning than sinned against. And I know that’s an absolutely heretical thought to end the show on, but I’m sorry. I believe it’s the truth.

Press TV:
All right gentlemen, stay safe, to both of you. And thank you both for your input on our program here. Dr. Kevin Barrett there, editor at “Veterans Today”, joining us out of Morocco, and Gilbert Doctorow, independent international affairs analyst joining us out of Brussels.

12:0=
And viewers, that brings us to your conclusion of this segment of your PressTV News Review program. Thank you for tuning in, and goodbye for now.

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2024/06/16/ ... nutrition/

******

ICAN: ‘Israel’ Owns 90 Nuclear Warheads
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 17, 2024
Al Mayadeen

Image
Secret nuclear facilities in Israel

The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons estimates that “Israel” is in possession of at least 90 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, based on deductions from increased nuclear spending.

The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) revealed that “Israel” possesses 90 nuclear warheads and was boosting its nuclear spending.

In a report examining expenditures on nuclear development, ICAN found that the Israeli occupation has increased its nuclear spending by 2.4%, the equivalent of 1.1 billion dollars per year.

Collective nuclear spending reached 13.4% last year, or 91.4 billion dollars around the world. The United States held first place, spending 51.5 billion dollars on nuclear development, garnering 80% of collective nuclear expenditures.

In a statement to Al Mayadeen, Alicia Sanders-Zakre, the Policy and Research Coordinator at ICAN, discussed “Israel’s” ambiguity regarding its nuclear arsenal.

According to Sanders-Zakre, it is known among international nuclear experts that the Israeli occupation possesses nuclear weapons. According to ICAN’s estimations, 90 nuclear warheads were identified to be owned by “Israel”, but the number remains obscure due to the lack of transparency and Tel Aviv’s obscurity regarding owning any nuclear weapons.

Regarding “Israel’s” nuclear spending, ICAN managed to deduce the estimations by referring to the occupation’s military spending in 2023, which was discussed with Israeli experts to allocate the actual military spending [taking into consideration additional spending due to the war on Gaza]. An estimation was then formed and allocated to Israeli nuclear spending.

Sanders-Zakre also expressed her concerns regarding recent Israeli threats to use nuclear weapons in Gaza.

“There have been extremely concerning threats that have been increasingly implied and frank than what we’ve seen in previous years from Israeli experts, officials, or former officials, which is why it is important to condemn the use of nuclear weapons and prompt a reminder about the vitality of adhering to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,” she said.

Estimations are much higher than 90 warheads

Regarding its possession of nuclear weapons, “Israel” has adopted a policy of deliberate ambiguity, refusing to disclose whether or not it possesses nuclear weapons. However, the occupation’s possession of such weapons is now a “public secret”, especially since a number of formerly highly classified US documents have revealed that the US was convinced that “Israel” had nuclear weapons.

It is worth noting that the entity is estimated by some to possess between 200 to 400 nuclear warheads, making it the sole possessor of non-conventional arms in the Middle East. Despite international pressure, “Israel” has refused to allow inspections of its nuclear facilities or to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

In 2022, the First Committee of the UN General Assembly ruled in a 152-5 decision that “Israel” must destroy all its nuclear weapons and submit its nuclear facilities to the control of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Four countries – Canada, Micronesia, Palau, and the United States – as well as the Israeli entity, opposed Friday’s resolution on the “risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.” Another 24 countries abstained, including European Union members.

The resolution discloses that “Israel” is the only entity in the Middle East region and one of the few UN members (193 total) that have not signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

The resolution reaffirmed “the importance of Israel’s accession to the NPT and placement of all its nuclear facilities under comprehensive international atomic Energy Nancy safeguards, in realizing the goal of universal adherence to the Treaty in the Middle East.”



https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... -warheads/

All the better to fulfill Biblical Prophecy sez the christo-fascist zionists.

******

Netanyahu disbands Israeli war cabinet

With mounting losses inside Gaza and dwindling hopes of regaining control of Israel's northern settlements, the Israeli premier says military decisions will be made 'during small ad hoc meetings' moving forward

News Desk

JUN 17, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Israeli prime minister's office)
Israeli media reports on 17 June revealed that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formally dissolved the emergency war cabinet – formed on 11 October to manage the campaigns against the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance – in a decision made one week after opposition leader Benny Gantz resigned from the emergency body.

“The cabinet was in the coalition agreement with [National Unity MK Benny] Gantz at his request. As soon as Gantz left – there is no need for a cabinet anymore,” Netanyahu reportedly told a meeting of the political-security cabinet on Sunday night.

According to the reports, the premier stressed there will not be a new cabinet formed of the leaders of his governing coalition, an idea put forward by ultranationalist ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir.

“In order to reach the goal of eliminating the capabilities of Hamas, I made decisions that were not always acceptable to the military echelon,” Netanyahu is quoted as saying, adding: “We have a country with an army and not an army with a country.”

Reports on Monday morning highlighted that the premier plans “to make critical decisions on the war during small ad hoc meetings without Ben Gvir while seeking final approval from the wider security cabinet.”

Netanyahu’s decision comes as the Israeli army finds itself in a growing quagmire inside Gaza and at the border with Lebanon in the north.

“Israeli hopes for the battle in Rafah are misleading the public … Hamas has succeeded in rebuilding itself in the Gaza Strip,” Israeli commentator on Palestinian affairs, Ohad Hamo, told Channel 12 on Sunday.

In the north of Israel, Hezbollah attacks have become increasingly more precise over recent months after the resistance managed to take out more than 1,500 Israeli intelligence posts and devices.

https://thecradle.co/articles/netanyahu ... ar-cabinet

Israeli lawmakers unite to push for Jewish colonization of Gaza

Many in Israel view the war on Gaza as an effort to conquer new land, cleanse it of Palestinians, and settle Jews in their place

News Desk

JUN 17, 2024

Image
Otzma Yehudit MK Limor Son Har-Melech (Photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Two members of Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s Jewish Power (Otzma Yehudit) party announced the establishment of a parliamentary caucus lobby for Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip, the Times of Israel reported on 17 June.

In a joint release, MKs Zvi Sukkot and Limor Son Har-Melech announced the establishment of the “Knesset Caucus for the Renewal of Settlement in the Gaza Strip.”

The Knesset members stated that the lobby, slated to launch Tuesday, is necessary to reverse the effects of the 2005 Disengagement from Gaza. The Disengagement led to the dismantling of the Gush Katif settlement bloc and four Jewish settlement outposts in the occupied West Bank.

For several years preceding the current war, religious Zionist settlers in Israel called for a war to conquer Gaza, reverse the Disengagement, and rebuild Gush Katif.

According to the two MKs, “settlement in the Gaza Strip [is] a necessary step to protect Israel’s security and ensure its future.”

“Only by a dense presence of Jewish settlements throughout Gaza will it be possible to prevent the continuation of terrorist threats and deter the enemy,” they state.

“Only settlement will bring security,” says Sukkot, a prominent settler activist who was arrested multiple times and suspected of involvement in the burning of a mosque in the occupied West Bank. “Only Jewish children playing in the Strip will make the Nova terrorists realize that they have lost.”

“When they realize that they are losing control of Gaza and losing the land of Gaza, they will be ready to release hostages without setting conditions that pose a threat to the existence of the State of Israel,” he adds.

Son Har Melech, who was a resident of the northern West Bank settlement of Homesh before Israel evacuated it during the Disengagement, claimed that “if we do not plant deep Jewish roots in the land of Gaza, the enemy will continue to expand the range of his attacks and continue to threaten us.”

“Without settlement, not only the residents of the Gaza border area but also the residents of the north and other parts of the country will never feel safe,” she says.

In January, 11 ministers and 15 coalition lawmakers attended a mass conference to advocate the rebuilding of Jewish settlements in the heart of the Gaza Strip.

To make way for Jewish settlement in Gaza, many in the Israeli government advocate the destruction of Palestinian cities and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.

Shortly after the war started, Israeli culture magazine Mekomit published a leaked document issued by Israel’s Ministry of Intelligence recommending the occupation of Gaza and the total transfer of its 2.3 million inhabitants to Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.

The document, issued on 13 October, identifies a plan to transfer all residents of the Gaza Strip to North Sinai as the preferred option among three alternatives for the end of the war between Israel and the Hamas-led Palestinian resistance.

The document recommends that Israel evacuate the Gazan population to Sinai during the war, establish tent cities and new cities in northern Sinai to accommodate the deported population, and then create a closed security zone stretching several kilometers inside Egypt. The deported Palestinians would not be allowed to return to any areas near the Israeli border.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-l ... on-of-gaza

('How The West Was Won')

Israel welcome to invade Lebanon, resistance is ready: Hezbollah MP

Ibrahim Moussawi stated that Hezbollah has made preparations that Israeli leaders 'can never imagine' should they try to invade Lebanon

News Desk

JUN 17, 2024

Image
Lebanese MP Ibrahim Moussawi (Photo credit: Sky News)

During a conversation co-hosted by The Cradle on 16 June, Hezbollah-affiliated Lebanese MP Ibrahim Moussawi shared his perspectives on the ongoing war between Israel and the Axis of Resistance in Lebanon and Gaza.

In relation to the possibility of a larger war erupting on the Israeli–Lebanese border, Moussawi stated that neither Hezbollah nor Israel wants a wider war but that the Islamic resistance is ready if Israel decides to invade.

“If they want to come to Lebanon, they are welcome. We are waiting for them. Ahlan wa Sahlan, as they say in Arabic,” he stated.

Moussawi noted that Israel is having difficulty managing the war in Gaza and asked where Israel would get the troops to launch a much more difficult invasion of Lebanon. “They can’t manage themselves in Gaza, and they want to come here? In Gaza, they are not fighting. They are just bombarding and sending drones. But if they do come, we are anxiously waiting for them. We have made preparations that they can never imagine,” he added.

Regarding Hezbollah’s accomplishments in the war against Israel so far, the Lebanese MP pointed out that the party’s daily attacks against Israeli military positions and settlements have displaced some 200,000 Israelis and paralyzed economic activity in areas that Israel long viewed as secure.

Moussawi stated, “In Lebanon, at the beginning of the war, many started to mock and say our interference was not helpful. It is not doing anything. But Israelis are the experts. Their leaders and their intelligence apparatus have admitted that the front in northern Palestine has caused great suffering for Israelis.”

He added that Hezbollah is fighting a “war of attrition” against Israel along a 120-kilometer front line that has now lasted eight months and involved thousands of operations.

“We are talking about huge losses they do not admit, but later they will. It is unprecedented. It costs them a lot on the moral and military levels.”

When asked about recent Israeli threats to bomb civilians in the Lebanese capital, Beirut, as the Israeli army did during its invasion of Lebanon in 1982, Moussawi explained, “That was in the past, not the present. Now, if they destroy, we destroy. If they destroy our infrastructure, we will destroy their infrastructure. The Israelis know very well that Hezbollah is capable of targeting in a very precise way any place in occupied Palestine with our ballistic missiles and drones, from here in the north to the farthest point in the south. So if they think they can come to Lebanon, we are ready for it. They are welcome.”

Regarding Hezbollah’s goals, Moussawi stated that the party must ensure the resistance in Gaza is not crushed and that this goal has been successful thus far. He said that over 70 percent of Hamas’ leadership and fighting brigades are intact and that they have reorganized to overcome the losses Israel has inflicted on them so far.

“I will tell you that Hamas has won the war. They can fight for months to come, if not for years. They are ready to fight like on the 8th of October.” Moussawi stated.

He added, “The kind of morale they have, the kind of belief they have, cannot be defeated. All the Palestinians fighting for Hamas and Islamic Jihad are heroes, superheroes. And even more so, the Palestinian women are heroes. They continue to shed their blood and have never raised the white flag. They never surrender or stab the resistance in the back.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-we ... zbollah-mp
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Jun 19, 2024 11:19 am

Netanyahu Plots More Illegal West Bank Colonies
June 17, 2024

The Israeli prime minister’s statement on Sunday was presented as a retaliation against countries that recently joined the majority of the international community in recognizing Palestinian statehood.

Image
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in April 2021. (DoD, Jack Sanders)

By Jake Johnson
Common Dreams

Top Israeli officials on Sunday discussed plans to expand illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank as an act of retaliation against countries that recently joined the majority of the international community in recognizing Palestinian statehood.

The office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu released a statement Sunday announcing that government officials “discussed steps to strengthen settlement in Judea and Samaria, including in response to the countries that unilaterally recognized a Palestinian state after October 7, as well as a series of responses against the [Palestinian Authority] following its actions against Israel in [international] bodies.”

“The defense minister and the attorney general requested additional time to comment on several of the proposed clauses,” the statement added.

The government’s announcement, released hours before Netanyahu dissolved Israel’s war cabinet, comes amid an unprecedented wave of settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank — violence that Israeli soldiers have abetted and frequently joined.

Settlers and Israeli forces have demolished homes, razed refugee camps, set fire to cars and businesses, and carried out summary executions of West Bank residents — including children — in the eight months since Israel launched its assault on Gaza.

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who has vocally supported the ethnic cleansing of Palestinian territories, recently threatened that Israel’s military would turn the West Bank into “ruined cities like in the Gaza Strip.”

CNN noted Sunday that Smotrich suggested last month that “Israel should approve 10,000 settlements in the West Bank, establish a new settlement for every country that recognizes a state of Palestine, and cancel travel permits for Palestinian Authority officials.”

“This is what total unchecked impunity sounds like,” researcher Abe Silberstein wrote on social media following the latest news of Israel’s settlement-expansion plans. “Netanyahu knows Biden will do nothing, and that he will in fact stop others from doing anything.”

The Biden administration, which acknowledged earlier this year that Israeli settlements are “inconsistent with international law,” has sanctioned a handful of settlers as well as an entity accused of fundraising for them, but critics say the actions were largely a public relations stunt.

Image
Israeli soldiers searching a Palestinian in Tel Rumaida, Gilbert checkpoint in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron, January 2012. (Friends123, CC0, Wikimedia Commons)

In May — amid growing global outrage over Israel’s brutalization of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank — Norway, Ireland, and Spain announced their decision to formally recognize Palestinian statehood, drawing a furious response from Israel’s right-wing government, which warned of “severe consequences” for the move.

Earlier this month, Slovenia’s Parliament overwhelmingly voted to recognize Palestine, becoming the latest European country to do so.

Meanwhile, Israeli leaders — including Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant — are facing the possibility of arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court’s top prosecutor, who applied for the warrants against Israeli officials and Hamas leaders last month.

A United Nations report published last week found that Israeli forces in the West Bank have “committed acts of sexual violence, torture, and inhuman or cruel treatment and outrages upon personal dignity, all of which are war crimes.”

“Furthermore,” according to the report, “the government of Israel and Israeli forces permitted, fostered, and instigated a campaign of settler violence against Palestinian communities in the West Bank.”

U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said in a statement Friday that “while the world is understandably focused on the destruction unfolding in Gaza, we should not lose sight of what is happening in the West Bank — actions which are in violation of both American and international law.”

“Let’s be clear: The right-wing, extremist Netanyahu government is not only breaking international law in Gaza, they are doing the same in the West Bank, where they are pursuing illegal annexation by force,” said Sanders. “Netanyahu should be facing serious consequences for these violations, not receiving an invitation to address a joint session of Congress.”

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/06/17/n ... -colonies/

******

Palestinians struggle to document 'entire generations' wiped out by Israel

An AP investigation says the 'killing of families across generations' is a key part of the genocide case against Israel

News Desk

JUN 17, 2024

Image
Left: a grieving family at the funeral of an IDF soldier. Right: the aftermath of an Israeli air strike on a mosque in Gaza City (Photo credit: Amir Levy/Getty Images and Mahmud Hams/Getty Images)

An AP investigation identified over 60 Palestinian families where at least 25 people were killed, at times four generations from the same bloodline, by Israeli bombing in just the first two months of the war on Gaza.

Nearly a quarter of those families lost more than 50 family members killed by US bombs dropped by Israeli Air Force pilots in those weeks. Several families have almost no one left to document the horrific death toll.

The AP presents an account of the case of Youssef Salem, whose “hard drive is stocked with photos of the dead. He spent months filling a spreadsheet with their vital details as news of their deaths was confirmed, to preserve a last link to the web of relationships he thought would thrive for generations more.”

“My uncles were wiped out, totally. The heads of households, their wives, children, and grandchildren,” Salem told the AP from his home in Istanbul.

In past wars over the last two decades, ten members of his family were killed in Israeli strikes. “Nothing like this war,” he said.

In the Mughrabi family, more than 70 members were killed in a single Israeli airstrike in December. In the Abu Najas family, over 50 were killed in Israeli strikes in October, including at least two pregnant women. In the Doghmush clan, at least 44 members were killed by Israeli pilots in a strike on a mosque. Over 100 family members were killed in the following weeks.

More than 80 members of the Abu al-Qumssan family were killed in Israeli strikes.

“The numbers are shocking,” said Hussam Abu al-Qumssan, who lives in Libya and has struggled to keep track of the family deaths.

Nearly 1,900 families have suffered multiple deaths by January, including more than 300 that lost over 10 members in the first month of the war alone, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

The AP notes that the “killing of families across generations” is a key part of the genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

Separately, the International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan is seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity, including for the intentional killing and starvation of civilians.

“Palestinians will remember entire families that have disappeared from their lives,” said Ramy Abdu, chairman for the Geneva-based EuroMed Human Rights Monitor. “It is like a whole village or hamlet has been wiped out.”

The AP concluded, “The deaths across generations slice through the Palestinian society, history, and future. Entire families are buried in mass graves, in hospital courtyards, or beneath staircases in the homes where they were killed.”

Hamas resistance fighters from Gaza attacked Israeli military bases and settlements on 7 October. During the attack, 1,200 Israelis were killed. Hamas killed some, while the Israeli army killed large numbers. Israeli helicopters, drones, and tanks opened fire on Israeli civilians, burning many alive and burying others in their homes to prevent them from being taken captive by Hamas into Gaza, under the Hannibal Directive.

In the next five days, Israel Air Force unleashed even more firepower on Gaza, dropping 6,000 bombs on Gaza, including many unguided missiles.

Israel’s relentless bombing has now killed more than 37,000 Palestinians, many of whom were women and children.

Eleven members of the Agha family were killed in a single strike on a family home in the first week of the war. Then, on 21 October, an Israeli airstrike destroyed the home of Khamis al-Agha, killing him and 10 others: his wife, their four young children; his brother and his 9-year-old son and 3-year-old daughter; his cousin and her 18-year-old boy. Only the brother’s wife survived.

Jaser al-Agha, a second cousin of Khamis, helped medics pull bodies from the debris.

“Nothing is left of the house,” said Jaser al-Agha.

By the spring, AP documented nearly 100 members of the Agha family who were killed in Israeli strikes. Jaser al-Agha has “buried almost more relatives than he can count,” the AP wrote, including three cousins he considered brothers.

“I was waiting for my turn,” he said.

https://thecradle.co/articles/palestini ... -by-israel

Israeli response to Hamas truce amendments: ‘War will continue after Rafah’

Hamas has demanded that a permanent ceasefire be guaranteed in the first stage of an agreement

News Desk

JUN 18, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Menahem Kahana/AFP/Getty Images)

Israel will not accept any changes to the current proposal for a ceasefire agreement in Gaza, which Hamas has requested amendments to, a senior Israeli negotiator told Hebrew newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth on 18 June.

“There will be no negotiations on an outline other than the one accepted by the UN Security Council,” the anonymous negotiator told the daily.

Hamas’ response to the proposal constitutes “total refusal,” the negotiator said, warning that Israel will continue its genocidal war on Gaza even after the end of operations in the southernmost city of Rafah. Tel Aviv had previously claimed that Rafah was Hamas’ final stronghold and that attacking the city was its key to victory in the war.

“If Hamas thinks that at the end of the operation in Rafah, the fighting will end – it will be disappointed. Israel will continue to conduct a strong and effective military campaign. The army has prepared the continuation of operations even after the end of the fighting in Rafah, and Israel will remain in Gaza,” the negotiator went on to say.

His comments come as Israel has yet to publicly back the latest proposal, announced by US President Joe Biden in late May and supported by a UN Security Council Resolution last week. Biden said on 31 May that Israel had agreed to the proposal.

Despite this and the UN resolution that followed, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has affirmed that Israel will not stop the war until Hamas is defeated and the goals of the war are achieved.

Hamas announced on 11 June that it gave mediators its response to the proposal. A spokesman for the movement, Jihad Taha, said Hamas has requested “amendments that confirm the cease-fire, withdrawal, reconstruction and [prisoner] exchange.”

In its response, Hamas opposed a clause that gives Israel veto power over the names of Palestinian prisoners set to be exchanged for Israeli captives. It also reportedly demanded transferring the reconstruction process to the first stage of the proposal instead of the third, as well as complete adherence to a permanent ceasefire in the first stage as opposed to the second stage.

The proposal announced on 31 May called for a “temporary cessation of hostilities” for 42 days, which would then be followed by open-ended talks for a permanent ceasefire – something Hamas finds unacceptable since it does not guarantee an end to the war.

The document says the temporary ceasefire could be extended “as long as negotiations on the conditions of stage two of [the] agreement are ongoing.”

Hamas is also calling for the removal of the 18-year-long Israeli blockade of Gaza, including opening border crossings, allowing freedom of movement for people, and transporting goods inside the decimated enclave without restrictions.

An Israeli official said last week that “it is difficult to start negotiations under these circumstances,” referring to the amendments Hamas requested.

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken accused Hamas of holding up the deal by requesting the changes.

“There are no significant amendments that, according to Hamas leadership, warrant objection,” the unnamed Hamas leader told Reuters at the time..

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-r ... fter-rafah

UN warns West Bank ‘rapidly deteriorating’ as Palestinian deaths exceed 500
Over 520 Palestinians, including more than 130 children, have been killed by Israeli soldiers and settlers in the occupied West Bank since 7 October

News Desk

JUN 18, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AFP)

UN human rights chief Volker Turk warned on 18 June that the situation in the occupied West Bank is “rapidly deteriorating,” coming after a recent spike in Israeli violence in the territory.

“The situation in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is dramatically deteriorating,” Turk said during the opening session of the UN Human Rights Council, also condemning the ongoing “unconscionable death and suffering” in the Gaza Strip.

The human rights chief noted that over 500 Palestinians and 23 Israelis have been killed in the occupied West Bank since 7 October. The death toll in the West Bank raises “serious concerns about unlawful killings,” Turk warned.

He also said he was “appalled by the disregard for international human rights and humanitarian law” in Gaza.

Violence against Palestinians by Israeli forces and illegal settlers in the occupied West Bank has increased significantly following Operation Al-Aqsa Flood and the start of the war in Gaza in October.

Since then, over 528 Palestinians – among them 133 children – have been killed by Israeli troops and settlers.

Three Palestinians were injured on Monday evening when settlers stormed the town of Dayr Dibwan, east of Ramallah, and began pelting residents and vehicles with stones. Israeli troops sealed off the entrances to the Al-Fawwar and Al-Arroub refugee camps in the city of Hebron that night, raiding homes and making several arrests.

Israel has continued to launch violent raids into West Bank cities in an attempt to root out resistance factions based there, often killing civilians in the process.

Israeli forces shot and killed a 16-year-old Palestinian in the occupied West Bank town of Beit Furik, southeast of Nablus, on 15 June.

Earlier in the month, Israeli forces killed twelve people in the occupied West Bank in a span of two days during raids in Tubas, Ramallah, and the Jenin district.

Seven Palestinian civilians were shot dead by Israeli snipers in the Jenin refugee camp on 21 May. Images and videos from recent Israeli incursions into the city of Jenin and its camp show widespread destruction.

https://thecradle.co/articles/un-warns- ... exceed-500

******.

The United States Is the Main Obstacle to Peace in Palestine
Posted on June 18, 2024 by Yves Smith

Yves here. Even though the headline is obvious to those paying attention to the war in Gaza, it nevertheless seems to require repeating. This piece starts by debunking the latest peace plan headfake (the US pretending it originated with Israel so as to blame Hamas for the failure to come to a deal) and then gives a fine, high-level historical treatment of the long-standing US support of Israel’s war crimes in Palestine.

By Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies, the authors of War in Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict, published by OR Books in November 2022. Medea Benjamin is the cofounder of CODEPINK for Peace, and the author of several books, including Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Nicolas J. S. Davies is an independent journalist, a researcher for CODEPINK and the author of Blood on Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq

Image
US Marines and IDF soldiers in joint maneuver Intrepid Maven, Feb. 28, 2023. Photo: US Marines

On June 13, Hamas responded to persistent needling by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken over the U.S. proposal for a pause in the Israeli massacre in Gaza. The group said it has “dealt positively… with the latest proposal and all proposals to reach a cease-fire agreement.” Hamas added, by contrast, that, “while Blinken continues to talk about ‘Israel’s approval of the latest proposal, we have not heard any Israeli official voicing approval.”

The full details of the U.S. proposal have yet to be made public, but the pause in Israeli attacks and release of hostages in the first phase would reportedly lead to further negotiations for a more lasting cease-fire and the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in the second phase. But there is no guarantee that the second round of negotiations would succeed.

As former Israeli Labor Party prime minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio on June 3rd, “How do you think [Gaza military commander] Sinwar will react when he is told: but be quick, because we still have to kill you, after you return all the hostages?”

Meanwhile, as Hamas pointed out, Israel has not publicly accepted the terms of the latest U.S. cease-fire proposal, so it has only the word of U.S. officials that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has privately agreed to it. In public, Netanyahu still insists that he is committed to the complete destruction of Hamas and its governing authority in Gaza, and has actually stepped up Israel’s vicious attacks in central and southern Gaza.

The basic disagreement that President Joe Biden and Secretary Blinken’s smoke and mirrors cannot hide is that Hamas, like every Palestinian, wants a real end to the genocide, while the Israeli and U.S. governments do not.

Biden or Netanyahu could end the slaughter very quickly if they wanted to—Netanyahu by agreeing to a permanent cease-fire, or Biden by ending or suspending U.S. weapons deliveries to Israel. Israel could not carry out this war without U.S. military and diplomatic support. But Biden refuses to use his leverage, even though he has admitted in an interview that it was “reasonable” to conclude that Netanyahu is prolonging the war for his own political benefit.

The U.S. is still sending weapons to Israel to continue the massacre in violation of a cease-fire order by the International Court of Justice. Bipartisan U.S. leaders have invited Netanyahu to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress on July 24, even as the International Criminal Court reviews a request by its chief prosecutor for an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for war crimes, crimes against humanity and murder.

The United States seems determined to share Israel’s self-inflicted isolation from voices calling for peace from all over the world, including large majorities of countries in the UN General Assembly and Security Council.

But perhaps this is appropriate, as the United States bears a great deal of responsibility for that isolation. By its decades of unconditional support for Israel, and by using its UN Security Council veto dozens of times to shield Israel from international accountability, the United States has enabled successive Israeli governments to pursue flagrantly criminal policies and to thumb their noses at the growing outrage of people and countries across the world.

This pattern of U.S. support for Israel goes all the way back to its founding, when Zionist leaders in Palestine unleashed a well-planned operation to seize much more territory than the UN allocated to their new state in its partition plan, which the Palestinians and neighboring countries already firmly opposed.

The massacres, the bulldozed villages and the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 to a million people in the Nakba have been meticulously documented, despite an extraordinary propaganda campaign to persuade two generations of Israelis, Americans and Europeans that they never happened.

The U.S. was the first country to grant Israel de facto recognition on May 14, 1948, and played a leading role in the 1949 UN votes to recognize the new state of Israel within its illegally seized borders. President Eisenhower had the wisdom to oppose Britain, France and Israel in their war to capture the Suez Canal in 1956, but Israel’s seizure of the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 1967 persuaded U.S. leaders that it could be a valuable military ally in the Middle East.

Unconditional U.S. support for Israel’s illegal occupation and annexation of more and more territory over the past 57 years has corrupted Israeli politics and encouraged increasingly extreme and racist Israeli governments to keep expanding their genocidal territorial ambitions. Netanyahu’s Likud party and government now fully embrace their Greater Israel plan to annex all of occupied Palestine and parts of other countries, wherever and whenever new opportunities for expansion present themselves.

Israel’s de facto expansion has been facilitated by the United States’ monopoly over mediation between Israel and Palestine, which it has aggressively staked out and defended against the UN and other countries. The irreconcilable contradiction between the U.S.’s conflicting roles as Israel’s most powerful military ally and the principal mediator between Israel and Palestine is obvious to the whole world.

But as we see even in the midst of the genocide in Gaza, the rest of the world and the UN have failed to break this U.S. monopoly and establish legitimate, impartial mediation by the UN or neutral countries that respect the lives of Palestinians and their human and civil rights.

Qatar mediated a temporary cease-fire between Israel and Hamas in November 2023, but it has since been upstaged by U.S. moves to prolong the massacre through deceptive proposals, cynical posturing and Security Council vetoes. The U.S. consistently vetoes all but its own proposals on Israel and Palestine in the UN Security Council, even when its own proposals are deliberately meaningless, ineffective or counterproductive.

The UN General Assembly is united in support of Palestine, voting almost unanimously year after year to demand an end to the Israeli occupation. A hundred and forty-four countries have recognized Palestine as a country, and only the U.S. veto denies it full UN membership. The Israeli genocide in Gaza has even shamed the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) into suspending their ingrained pro-Western bias and pursuing cases against Israel.

One way that the nations of the world could come together to apply greater pressure on Israel to end its assault on Gaza would be a “Uniting for Peace” resolution in the UN General Assembly. This is a measure the General Assembly can take when the Security Council is prevented from acting to restore peace and security by the veto of a permanent member.

Israel has demonstrated that it is prepared to ignore cease-fire resolutions by the General Assembly and the Security Council, and an order by the ICJ, but a Uniting for Peace resolution could impose penalties on Israel for its actions, such as an arms embargo or an economic boycott. If the United States still insists on continuing its complicity in Israel’s international crimes, the General Assembly could take action against the U.S. too.

A General Assembly resolution would change the terms of the international debate and shift the focus back from Biden and Blinken’s diversionary tactics to the urgency of enforcing the lasting cease-fire that the whole world is calling for.

It is time for the United Nations and neutral countries to push Israel’s U.S. partner in genocide to the side, and for legitimate international authorities and mediators to take responsibility for enforcing international law, ending the Israeli occupation of Palestine and bringing peace to the Middle East.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/06 ... stine.html

******

Image

Making October 7 About Antisemitism To Hide Israel’s Abuses

They keep telling you October 7 happened because Hamas hates Jews because they don’t want you asking questions about Israel’s actions which provoked the attack.

Caitlin Johnstone
June 18, 2024



They keep telling you October 7 happened because Hamas hates Jews because they don’t want you asking questions about Israel’s actions which provoked the attack.

The October 7 attack was unquestionably provoked by Israel’s extensively documented abuses of the Palestinian people, but whenever you say this you get Israel supporters shrieking “How dare you JUSTIFY the actions of Hamas?? Nothing could JUSTIFY such a savage attack!” It’s a good example of how empire apologia in the 2020s largely consists of deliberately conflating the words “provoked” and “justified”.

Whether or not the October 7 attack was justified is a mental judgement; the answer to that question will always necessarily be entirely comprised of subjective opinion. Which means if the empire apologist can drag the debate kicking and screaming into the question of whether it was justified they’ve actually got a leg to stand on, since then they’re only dealing with feelings and opinions. If you keep the focus on the unassailably factual claim that the attack was provoked then they’ve got nothing, because the facts are all squarely against them.

Keeping this distinction conscious clears up a lot of imperial spin, whether you’re talking about the Hamas attack, Russia’s entirely provoked invasion of Ukraine, or the war the empire is trying to provoke with China over Taiwan.



The imperial spin machine is smearing people who ask inconvenient questions about October 7 with accusations of “October 7 denialism”, a phrase which is deliberately worded to invoke the emotional response that people have to Holocaust denialism.

The thing about this charge is that, unlike Holocaust denialism, nobody actually denies that the October 7 attack happened, they just dispute certain aspects of the mainstream narrative. This is being framed as something sinister and nefarious, despite the completely undisputed fact that Israel has been caught circulating many lies about what happened on October 7.



It’s hilarious how often I get Israel apologists in my comments going “How can you oppose Israel after what Australia did to the Aboriginal people??”

It’s hilarious because of how fast these freaks will drop their “Jews are indigenous to Israel” schtick and admit that it’s just another genocidal western settler-colonialist project the millisecond they think they can score a few internet points by doing so.



US officials voicing “concerns” about humanitarian conditions in Gaza is like someone holding your head underwater while mumbling “Help, someone please help, this poor soul is drowning.”



A decaying, dystopian civilization with an active genocide in Gaza, nuclear brinkmanship with Russia and a looming global conflict with China, and all you’re encouraged to discuss politically is whether Donald Trump is a brave hero sent by Jesus or a big meanie Cheeto man.



It’s not just that you can’t criticize the actions of a foreign state without being smeared as a Jew-hating Nazi — you can’t even criticize your own country’s military allegiances to that state, or your own country’s media for its journalistic malpractice when covering it.

That’s about as bat shit insane a political dynamic as you could possibly come up with. But here in the western empire it’s regarded by the political-media class as not only normal but actually quite healthy.



Arguing that anti-Zionism is antisemitism because most Jews are Zionists is exactly the same as arguing that because most westerners have been propagandized into accepting western warmongering, opposing western warmongering means you must have a seething fascistic hatred of western people.

Jews get indoctrinated just like everyone else throughout the western empire. Their being Jewish doesn’t magically exempt them from the fact that the human mind is easily manipulated, and that the western empire pours more energy into mass-scale manipulation than any other power structure in history. Saying it’s hateful to oppose the imperial depravity that people were indoctrinated into accepting in the middle east is like saying it’s hateful to oppose the warmongering against China that the public is currently being indoctrinated into supporting here in Australia.

Most people in our society are deeply indoctrinated into supporting the agendas of the massive globe-spanning power structure we live under. This is true regardless of what religion they happen to belong to.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/06 ... ls-abuses/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Jun 20, 2024 11:08 am

Undetected, Hezbollah Hoopoe Mission Exposes Sensitive Israeli Sites
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 18, 2024
Al Mayadeen

Image
A screengrab from a Hezbollah drone video pinpoints the Haifa port area in northern Israel as “a strategic area with massive military, industrial and trade establishments” (Al Mayadeen)

Hezbollah publishes a nine-minute video showing its drones flying in occupied Palestinian airspace over sensitive Israeli infrastructure.


The Military Media of the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon – Hezbollah released Tuesday footage showing its reconnaissance drones flying over swathes of occupied Palestinian land, including Kiryat Shmona, Nahariya, Safad, Karmiel, Afula, all the way to Haifa and its port.

Titled “This is what the Hoopoe came back with,” the nine-minute-and-a-half video captured footage and exposed sensitive Israeli sites. Hezbollah indicated that the video was only the first episode of more yet to come, highlighting that the drones bypassed Israeli air defenses and returned to Lebanese airspace undetected.

The published footage included intelligence about Israeli sites inside occupied Palestine and clearly showed that the drone arrived at the port of Haifa intact. Hezbollah’s drones brought back footage and information about sensitive sites they captured over Haifa starting with the port itself to oil refineries and military factories, not to mention the locations of military battleships and important economic hubs in the port.

Rafael military-industrial complex

In detail, the video first shows Hezbollah’s drones flying over a military-industrial complex belonging to Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, which includes numerous factories, warehouses, and testing fields in which components of air defense systems are manufactured and assembled, especially the Iron Dome and David’s Sling.

Iron Dome and David’s Sling platforms, rocket engine test tunnel and storage, air defense missile storage, missile component manufacturing facilities, control and guidance systems factories, company administrative buildings, and missile testing radars all appeared in the video.

The scenes also filmed the Yitzhak Ben-Tzvi Street, Karti Square, Savyonei Yam complex, and Abraham Gardens towers.

Haifa Port Area

In addition, the Islamic Resistance’s drones reached occupied Haifa’s port — the largest in the occupied territories — and captured footage of the Haifa port Bay area, a highly valuable economic and trade area that hosts massive military installations, industrial infrastructure, and commercial areas.

The area includes the Haifa military base, which is the main naval base for the Israeli occupation forces, which is responsible for the northern naval front, as well as Iron Dome storage and platforms, petrochemical facilities, oil silos, the Haifa power station, and Haifa airport.

The Haifa Port area includes ship maintenance hangars, the building of Unit 3800 at Haifa Naval Base, the main warehouse and supply section at the Haifa Base dockyard, the Yaltam Unit building, submarine unit buildings, submarine dock and mooring, and the Sheyetet 7 submarine unit command building.

In addition, Hezbollah’s video filmed the Karmiel and Mizrahi piers, as well as container ships and port operations.

Warships filmed comprised military vessels, including the Bat Yam logistical support ship, Sa’ar 4.5, 5, and 6 boats, and the Dvora-class fast patrol boat.

Hezbollah’s video unveiled dozens of “super vital” targets

Major General Wasif Arikat described what Hezbollah revealed in the latest video as the “most valuable bank of targets.”

He told Al Mayadeen that the message behind the video has been received, adding that what is happening now is not a field war but a war of awareness that proved that the Israeli occupation army, once described as the “invincible army”, has been defeated and retreated.

On his part, Brigadier General Mohammad Abbas said that Hezbollah’s drones surpassed all air defense systems and returned without being detected by Israeli systems.

He highlighted to Al Mayadeen that the video unveiled dozens of “super vital” targets, demonstrating that the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon possesses highly advanced capabilities.

Brigadier General Abbas further explained that the name “Hoopoe”, which is a type of bird, reflects the long distance that Hezbollah’s drones traveled in occupied Palestinian lands before returning with such valuable scenes.

Israeli media described what Hezbollah’s drones documented as “disturbing” and “very dangerous”.

The Military Media for the Islamic Resistance in #Lebanon published a lengthy video of a reconnaissance drone surveilling vital and sensitive regions in northern occupied #Palestine to Haifa.

🧵1/4 pic.twitter.com/snzuHym3Hn

— Al Mayadeen English (@MayadeenEnglish) June 18, 2024


According to Hezbollah, the area is highly vital and sensitive, occupies an area of around 6.5 km2, and is 24 km away from the Lebanese-Palestinian border.

Krayot

The video also included an overview of Krayot, an Israeli suburb north of occupied Haifa, which includes six occupied cities with a population of 260,000 Israeli settlers. Hezbollah published a complete high-definition view of the urban conglomeration there, with a real-time tour detailing Krayot districts and neighborhoods, including residences of Israeli official residences and commercial complexes.

Experts decode messages in Hezbollah’s Hoopoe mission video

Expert sources tell Al Mayadeen that the timing of releasing the video is undoubtedly linked to the visit of US envoy Amos Hochstein to Lebanon on a mission “of Israeli nature.”

Hezbollah’s video ended with the phrase “and the birds as they soar,” which suggests that the Lebanese Resistance group’s drones are still flying in the airspace of occupied Palestine, expert sources told Al Mayadeen on Tuesday.

Earlier, the Military Media of the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon – Hezbollah released Tuesday footage showing its reconnaissance drones flying over swathes of occupied Palestinian land, including Kiryat Shmona, Nahariya, Safad, Karmiel, Afula, all the way to Haifa and its port.

Titled “This is what the Hoopoe came back with,” the nine-minute-and-a-half video captured footage and exposed sensitive Israeli sites. Hezbollah highlighted that its drones bypassed Israeli air defenses and returned to Lebanese airspace without being detected.



The sources said that the Hoopoe of the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon appears flying over the most sensitive installations, not just the Haifa military base.

They highlighted that one of the most important things documented by the Hoopoe is the area of ​​the military-industrial complex affiliated with the Rafael Company, which is an extremely sensitive area.

The sources explained that companies and websites specialized in aerial and industrial imaging refrain from publishing any updated images at the request of the Israeli government due to their sensitivity.

In the same context, the experts told Al Mayadeen that Hezbollah’s video includes three types of potential targets: military (the Military-Industrial Complex and the Haifa Military Base), civilian (the Krayot area), and strategic (Haifa Port and its facilities).

They added that the three types of potential targets are meant to establish a three-dimensional balance of deterrence against “Israel”, with each dimension relating to the type of target “Israel” may strike in any confrontation with Lebanon.

“Hezbollah wanted to say that [the equation is] military for military, civilian for civilian, and strategic for strategic,” the sources pointed out.

Touching on the details of the video, the experts explained that the missile illustrated next to the target card has guiding fins at its front, symbolizing a precise missile, which is a message Hezbollah intended to convey in the video.

They noted that the red missile illustrated next to the identification card of Haifa Port indicates that Hezbollah treats this site with a high level of seriousness in terms of potential targeting.

#شاهد الفيديو كاملاً…9 دقائق ونصف من الأراضي الفلسطينية المحتلة يعرضها #حزب_الله تحت عنوان: هذا ما رجع به الهدهد✌#الميادين #الإعلام_الحربي pic.twitter.com/Ptsc68ObHw

— قناة الميادين (@AlMayadeenNews) June 18, 2024


According to the experts, this video is only the first episode in a series yet to come, with subsequent episodes showing how far the Resistance’s reconnaissance drones have reached inside occupied Palestinian airspace.

Elsewhere, the sources told Al Mayadeen that the timing of releasing the video is undoubtedly linked to the visit of US envoy Amos Hochstein to Lebanon on a mission “of Israeli nature” even if it appears as part of a mediation effort.

Earlier, Hochstein called for an immediate de-escalation of tensions on the northern border between Lebanon and “Israel”.

Hezbollah’s video unveiled dozens of “super vital” targets

Major General Wasif Arikat described what Hezbollah revealed in the latest video as the “most valuable bank of targets.”

He told Al Mayadeen that the message behind the video has been received, adding that what is happening now is not a field war but a war of awareness that proved that the Israeli occupation army, once described as the “invincible army”, has been defeated and retreated.

On his part, Brigadier General Mohammad Abbas said that Hezbollah’s drones surpassed all air defense systems and returned without being detected by Israeli systems.

He highlighted to Al Mayadeen that the video unveiled dozens of “super vital” targets, demonstrating that the Islamic Resistance in Lebanon possesses highly advanced capabilities.

Brigadier General Abbas further explained that the name “Hoopoe”, which is a type of bird, reflects the long distance that Hezbollah’s drones traveled in occupied Palestinian lands before returning with such valuable scenes.

Israeli media described what Hezbollah’s drones documented as “disturbing” and “very dangerous”.

Hezbollah drone video stuns Israeli media with detailed Haifa surveillance

Israeli media closely monitored Hezbollah’s video broadcast by Al Mayadeen TV, noting that it “clearly shows Haifa Port, most likely filmed last Tuesday, from a Hezbollah drone.” It stressed, “A false alarm was issued a week ago in the Haifa Port area following an aerial infiltration in the early morning hours; apparently, it was not.”

In further detail, Israeli media have expressed astonishment at Hezbollah’s demonstrated capabilities, which have left military and security officials in “Israel” amazed.

Observers of the video can see residential areas in Haifa, underscoring the detailed nature of the drone footage and its implications for security assessments, as per Israeli media.

Furthermore, Israeli media criticized the filming of Haifa Port by a Hezbollah drone without any disturbance from the anti-air systems, noting that “Hezbollah, through its publication of images of Haifa Port, conveyed a threatening message to the port.”

As a matter of fact, experts revealed to Al Mayadeen that the missile illustrated next to the target card has guiding fins at its front, symbolizing a precise missile, which is a message Hezbollah intended to convey in the video.

They noted that the red missile illustrated next to the identification card of Haifa Port indicates that Hezbollah treats this site with a high level of seriousness in terms of potential targeting.

Other Israeli media outlets commented, saying, “Hezbollah has published aerial images of sensitive economic and military locations inside and near Haifa Port, including images of Sa’ar 4.5, 5,” adding that “the new documents are the most alarming since the beginning of the war.”

Israeli media stated, “Hezbollah has released one of the most challenging recordings in the war, not showing videos of killed or wounded, but a video revealing its intelligence capabilities.”

Regarding the timing of the video’s release, Israeli media argued that its timing was not coincidental, as it concurred with the visit of the US mediator to Lebanon and “Israel”.

Israeli media reported that “Hezbollah has grasped very well the Israeli threats to Lebanon through US mediator Hochstein, and it chose to respond with a special video indicating that if Israel takes a step against Lebanon, the bank of targets in Israel is all set and vast.”

It is worth noting that US envoy Amos Hochstein has earlier confirmed from the Lebanese capital Beirut that the situation along the Lebanese border with occupied Palestine is extremely dangerous, speaking about continuing efforts to de-escalate.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... eli-sites/

Egyptian Soldiers Say Their Army Has Failed Gaza
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 18, 2024
Shahenda Naguib

Image
Egyptian special forces soldiers deploy near the border with the Gaza Strip on 20 October 2023 (AFP)

Conscripts at the Sinai-Gaza border decry the Sisi government’s silence on the killing of own soldiers and inaction towards Israeli atrocities.


Since the Israeli onslaught on neighbouring Gaza in October, Egyptian soldier Mohamed Omar* has felt helpless.

Omar, 23, has served as a patrolling officer in Egypt’s North Sinai, along the border with Gaza’s Rafah, over the past year. The region is part of a demilitarised zone according to security pacts between Egypt and Israel, and only soldiers with light weapons are allowed to be deployed there.

“It is painful to know that you can help, but you are shackled and cannot help rescue your people from being slaughtered,” he told Middle East Eye while on leave in Port Said, a destination for soldiers to rest before heading off to their units in North Sinai.

“We’ve been watching and hearing how intense the Israeli bombing in Rafah is, and we see dozens of Palestinian families passing by the borders.”

Israel’s war on Gaza has so far killed more than 37,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

Egypt, an ally of Israel since their 1979 peace agreement, has maintained a largely non-confrontational stance towards Israel since the beginning of hostilities in October, even after the Israeli army’s seizure of the strategic Rafah crossing with Egypt in May and the deaths of at least two soldiers in armed clashes with Israeli soldiers earlier this month.

“We train day and night, and repeat marching chants against the Zionist enemy, and we hear dedicated newsletters bragging about how ready the military is, but when this enemy is killing thousands of our brothers, we sit idle,” Omar told MEE.

Middle East Eye has met five Egyptian soldiers, including Omar, most of whom have demonstrated their dissatisfaction with the way the government is dealing with the war in Gaza and with the killing of their comrades on the border with Israel.

The young soldier considers himself and his colleagues “elite fighters” trained to withstand harsh conditions and fight sophisticated targets. His unit, he added, has been reinforced by more elite and well-trained units from the counterterrorism division in North and Central Sinai since October.

Omar lost two comrades in clashes with Israeli soldiers earlier this month, but their deaths have had little recognition by the Egyptian army, including its senior leadership and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, he said.

Image
Funeral prayer held for Egyptian soldier Ibrahim Islam Abdelrazzaq in Sanhour village in Faiyum, 29 May 2024 (MEE/Sahl Abdelrahman)A funeral prayer held for Egyptian soldier Ibrahim Islam Abdelrazzaq in Sanhour village in Faiyum, 29 May 2024 (MEE/Sahl Abdelrahman)

Amid silence from Egyptian authorities, two soldiers from Faiyum were laid to rest in their hometowns last month after dying in clashes with Israeli forces near the Rafah border.

The two soldiers have been identified as Abdallah Ramadan and Ibrahim Islam Abdelrazzaq, who were both 22 years old.

Despite widespread sympathy for the slain soldiers, they have not received a military funeral or any high-level recognition, and state-linked media have not reported on their deaths.

Omar said morale in his unit is low because of the killing of his comrade Abdallah Ramadan.

Omar serves in a different platoon than the one Ramadan served in, but he said the response of the government was disrespectful.

“How come the martyr Ramadan was not honoured and his name was not mentioned, and there were no high ranks at his funeral?” asked Omar.

“When the lowest-ranking police conscript gets killed in a car accident, they get a military funeral, and Ramadan, who fought the Zionists, gets buried secretly. What a shame!” he added.

‘My blood will go in vain’

Omar said his superiors tried to calm them down after the death of Ramadan, explaining that “the enemy is trying to drag us into this to justify the killing of Palestinians and to use this as propaganda to tell the world Israel is being attacked from all sides”.

Similar reasons were also cited to the unit where Ahmed Tawfik*, 24, is serving in the mechanised infantry in Ismailia. “The moral affairs officer told us that Egypt is pushing a ceasefire, but the Netanyahu government wants to push Egypt into a war so it continues its aggression on the Arabs and Muslims.”

Both Tawfik and Omar are concerned that if they die in action during the current diplomatically complicated situation, their deaths will be for nothing. “I am concerned that if I get martyred, my blood will go in vain. Ramadan died and not a single bullet was fired to defend him.”

Tawfik said that morale in his unit is low as soldiers have similar fears.

“The only thought that makes these men withstand the [compulsory] service is the possibility that they will die as martyrs or that they will die for their homeland,” he said.

“If the government continues to be apathetic, the soldiers will not be able to restrain themselves from firing at the enemy like the martyr Mohamed Salah,” Tawfik added.

‘There are many ways to aid Palestinians, but the Egyptian military going to war is not the answer’

– Mostafa Marwan, soldier


Last June, Mohamed Salah, a 23-year-old Egyptian police conscript, killed three Israeli soldiers and wounded two others. He was later gunned down by Israeli forces.

However, Mostafa Marwan*, 25, a medic in Sinai, who is in his final months of service, said he is praying that Egypt does not go to war. “The thousands of conscripts you see … on TV in military parades, they are not the ones who are going to fight. There are thousands of soldiers who do not know how to shoot, or to take care of a wounded fellow soldier.”

Marwan said these conscripts are trained for only 45 days in basic camp and carry weapons that have been stored since the time of the Soviet Union.

“What are they going to do in the face of a military that is supported by the strongest and most sophisticated military in the world?” the young medic said, referring to US backing for Israel. “I am not a traitor, but one has to be realistic.”

Marwan added that as a military medic he only has basic equipment even though he is a surgeon, and that his superiors are abusive and corrupt.

“There are many ways to aid Palestinians, but the Egyptian military going to war is not the answer,” he said. “I am not surprised that the blood of the men on the front was cheap, but that is the result when all Egyptian blood became cheap.”

‘Forced to serve’

While Marwan is anti-war because of the unreadiness of the military, Tamer Samir*, who serves in Cairo in an air defence platoon, believes that Egypt should intervene to help Palestinians, but that he should not be in that military.

According to the Egyptian constitution, men aged 18 to 30 must serve in the military for at least 18 months, followed by a nine-year obligation to serve if called up for duty.

Having graduated from an international private university and coming from a well-off family, the 22-year-old Samir believes his conscription does not make sense. “Individuals like me who had the chance to be well educated and know languages should not be forced to serve and fight because we can help develop the country in other ways such as business or economics.”

Through a powerful connection, Samir’s family was able to secure the calmer posting, where he can go home every night, and only do administrative work. “I don’t really know much about war and politics, but I am looking forward to finishing my service.”

Like Samir, a lot of Egyptians seek connections either to skip or postpone conscription, or to get their service in big cities or in the administrative or business branches of the armed forces. The result leaves many underprivileged individuals and poorly educated young men on the front, on borders, or head to head with extremist militants.

“On the frontlines and on the border, you will find only soldiers from poor backgrounds – sons of farmers, workers, fishermen, and impoverished people,” Megahed Nassar*, a counterterrorism soldier in Sheikh Zuwied, who came to Faiyum to attend the funeral of Ramadan, told MEE.

“Abdallah Ramadan, Ibrahim Abdelrazzaq, Mohamed Salah, are all sons of poor people, and they paid their lives for the nation, and the government did not pull a finger to fight for their rights or even to defend them,” said Nassar, who is also from Faiyum.

“Most conscripts are forced to serve, are poor, have no other alternative, and do not have a connection. They go to Sinai and either fight the Israelis or the extremist militants.”

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... iled-gaza/

*******

Israeli bombing of Gaza leaves behind environmental catastrophe: UN

The UN Environment Programme reports that damage to Gaza’s agricultural sector is estimated to cost $629 million

News Desk

JUN 18, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: AFP)

A preliminary assessment released by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) on 18 June states that Israel’s war on Gaza has caused major environmental damage.

“The whole occupied Palestinian territory (the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem) was affected by environmental change and degradation before the escalation of the conflict following 7 October 2023,” the UN report began.

UNEP’s preliminary assessment reports that the war has reversed the progress in improving water desalination and wastewater treatment facilities, restoring the Wadi Gaza coastal wetland, and investments in solar energy projects.

“The conflict in Gaza has interrupted almost all environmental management systems and services (including ecosystem services) while creating new environmental hazards,” the report reads. “The collapse of sewage, wastewater, and solid waste management systems and facilities has had major impacts on the environment and people.”

The preliminary report results from a December 2023 request by the Palestinian Environment Quality Authority to examine the extent of environmental damage in the Palestinian Territories.

The preliminary continues to say, “The bombardment of Gaza, and the resulting destruction of buildings, roads, and other infrastructure has generated over 39 million tons of debris, some of which is contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXOs), asbestos and other hazardous substances.”

Explosive weapons dropped on Gaza have polluted each square meter of Gaza with more than 107 kilograms of debris.

“The total amount of debris from the current conflict in Gaza is more than five times the quantity of debris generated from the 2017 ISIL conflict in Mosul (7.65 million tons),” UNEP’s report read.

It also stated that the amount of debris in Gaza is equivalent to 10 Great Pyramids of Giza.

Testing the marine ecosystem is impossible due to the ongoing war. Still, the report states that “the conflict has almost certainly led to an increase in marine pollution from sources including untreated sewage, solid waste, and munitions.”

Furthermore, a look into Gaza’s agricultural sector shows that nearly half of Gaza’s arable land has been damaged as a result of Israel’s bombing campaigns.

“The Interim Damage Assessment records substantial destruction in the agricultural sector, estimated at $629 million, related to the destruction of trees, agricultural holdings, greenhouses, retail establishments and irrigation infrastructure,” UNEP’s report reads.

Gaza’s population has been a victim of a brutal humanitarian crisis at the hands of Israeli forces, who continue to expand operations despite international condemnation.

The report states that there has been an “unprecedented intensity of conflict-related damage” in this current war on Gaza in comparison to previous wars.

The report further called for a ceasefire to be implemented to prevent further deaths and reports that the UN, World Bank, and EU will be conducting further research to assess the needs of the Gaza Strip.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-b ... strophe-un

Israeli tanks push deeper into Rafah as shelling kills civilians in designated ‘safe zone’

Seven were killed and dozens injured in Israeli shelling on displacement tents in the coastal Al-Mawasi area

News Desk

JUN 19, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AFP)

Israeli forces pushed deeper into the western areas of Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah on 19 June, killing several people.

Tanks rolled their way into five neighborhoods in western Rafah early on Wednesday as Israeli shelling and gunfire targeted displacement tents in the coastal Al-Mawasi area.

“Occupation warplanes bombed the tents of the displaced people in Al-Mawasi, leading to the killing of at least seven citizens and the injury of dozens more. The shelling led to the outbreak of fires in the tents,” WAFA news agency cited local sources as saying.

Al-Mawasi is one of the areas previously designated as a “safe zone” by Tel Aviv.

Meanwhile, clashes between the army and the resistance were ongoing across Rafah and several other areas of Gaza as warplanes bombarded the strip, leaving several casualties in the central Nuseirat area and the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood in the north.

“Six civilians were killed in an Israeli air strike on the house of the Abu Safia family in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood of Gaza City. Rescue crews and citizens were also able to recover the bodies of three people who were killed in an Israeli bombing in the northwestern area of the Nuseirat camp,” WAFA reported.

Israeli troops also pushed back into northern Gaza’s Zaytoun neighborhood on 19 June. The army has launched several operations in Zaytoun since the start of the war and has been unable to root out Hamas’ armed wing, the Qassam Brigades.

The Qassam Brigades “targeted enemy forces penetrating southeast of the Al-Zaytoun neighborhood in Gaza City with heavy-caliber mortar shells,” the resistance group said in a statement on Wednesday.

Eight months into the war, Israel is no closer to its stated goal of eradicating Hamas’ armed wing. Prior to the operation in Rafah, Tel Aviv had said that the city was the group’s final stronghold.

A senior Israeli negotiator told Hebrew media on 18 June that Israel plans to continue fighting across the strip following the end of the operation in Rafah.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-t ... -safe-zone

White House ‘angry, shocked’ after Netanyahu accusation of holding up arms

This marks the second time a high-level US–Israel meeting has been canceled over tension between Washington and Tel Aviv

News Desk

JUN 19, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

The White House has canceled a high-level US–Israeli meeting on Iran over a video made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in which he chides Washington for holding back military aid from Israel, Axios reported on 19 June.

“This decision makes it clear that there are consequences for pulling such stunts,” one US official told Axios.

An Israeli official told the outlet that “the Americans are fuming. Bibi's video made a lot of damage.”

A group of Israeli officials was reportedly on their way to the US when the meeting was canceled. Two US officials said the cancellation was meant to send a message regarding the video. A third official said it was postponed due to a scheduling problem.

“Biden's team was angry and shocked by Netanyahu's ingratitude,” another US official is quoted as saying.

“We genuinely do not know what he is talking about,” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said about Netanyahu’s video, noting that only one weapons shipment to Israel has been paused since the start of the war, while billions in military aid has continued to flow uninterrupted.

In early May, Washington paused a shipment of weapons to Israel over concerns about its plans to invade the city of Rafah in southern Gaza. Tel Aviv has since launched a brutal assault against, committing numerous massacres.

Senior White House advisor Amos Hochstein, who was already scheduled to meet with Netanyahu on Tuesday on a stop to Israel while returning from Lebanon, personally delivered Washington’s message of enragement over the video.

“Once in the room, [Hochstein] told Netanyahu the accusations in the video were both inaccurate and out of line,” two Israeli officials briefed on the meeting said.

Netanyahu released the video on his social media account on the afternoon of 18 June.

“It’s inconceivable that in the past few months, the administration has been withholding weapons and ammunitions to Israel. Israel, America’s closest ally, fighting for its life, fighting against Iran and our other common enemies,” the premier said in the video.


“During World War II, [Winston] Churchill told the United States, ‘Give us the tools, we’ll do the job,’ And I say, give us the tools and we’ll finish the job a lot faster,” he added.

The premier also said in the video that he and US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken discussed the issue of munitions during the latter’s visit to Israel last week and that Blinken assured him “the administration is working day and night to remove these bottlenecks.”

Reports in Hebrew and German media claimed Blinken had promised to lift any restrictions on weapons transfers from the US to Israel.

Commenting on these reports and on Netanyahu’s video, the secretary said: “I’m not going to talk about what we said in diplomatic conversations.”

The meeting of strategic dialogue on Iran, scheduled for Thursday, was to take place for hours between State Department, Pentagon and intelligence officials and their Israeli counterparts. It was to be the first high-level round of US-Israeli talks on the Iranian nuclear program since March 2023.

This is the second strategic dialogue meeting on Iran between the two sides to be canceled. In March this year, Netanyahu canceled a scheduled meeting in protest against a US decision not to veto a UN Security Council Resolution that referenced a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip.

The cancellation came the same day that the US Congress signed off on a massive arms sale to Israel, which will include $18 billion worth of F-15 fighter jets.

https://thecradle.co/articles/white-hou ... ng-up-arms

******

Chris Hedges: Nero’s Guests
June 19, 2024

Sadism by the powerful is the curse of the human condition. It was as prevalent in ancient Rome as it is in Gaza.


Video courtesy of Gordon Dimmack & The Chris Hedges Report.

By Chris Hedges
ScheerPost

Israel has been poisoned by the psychosis of permanent war. It has been morally bankrupted by the sanctification of victimhood, which it uses to justify an occupation that is even more savage than that of apartheid South Africa.

Its “democracy” — which was always exclusively for Jews — has been hijacked by extremists who are pushing the country towards fascism. Human rights campaigners, intellectuals and journalists — Israeli and Palestinian — are subject to constant state surveillance, arbitrary arrests and government-run smear campaigns.

Its educational system, starting in primary school, is an indoctrination machine for the military. And the greed and corruption of its venal political and economic elite have created vast income disparities, a mirror of the decay within America’s democracy, along with a culture of anti-Arab and anti-Black racism.

By the time Israel achieves its decimation of Gaza — Israel is talking about months of warfare that will continue at least until the end of this year — it will have signed its own death sentence.

Its facade of civility, its supposed vaunted respect for the rule of law and democracy, its mythical story of the courageous Israeli military and miraculous birth of the Jewish nation — which it successfully sold to its Western audiences – will lie in ash heaps.

Israel’s social capital will be spent. It will be revealed as the ugly, repressive, hate-filled apartheid regime it always has been, alienating younger generations of American Jews. Its patron, the United States, as new generations come into power, will distance itself from Israel.

Its popular support will come from reactionary Zionists and America’s Christianized fascists who see Israel’s domination of ancient Biblical land as a harbinger of the Second Coming and in its subjugation of Arabs a kindred racism and celebration of white supremacy.

Israel will become synonymous with its victims the way Turks are synonymous with the Armenians, Germans are with the Namibians and later the Jews, and Serbs are with the Bosniaks.

Israel’s cultural, artistic, journalistic and intellectual life will be exterminated. Israel will be a stagnant nation where the religious fanatics, bigots and Jewish extremists who have seized power will dominate public discourse. It will join the club of the globe’s most despotic regimes.

Despotisms can exist long after their past due date. But they are terminal. You don’t have to be a Biblical scholar to see that Israel’s lust for rivers of blood is antithetical to the core values of Judaism.

The cynical weaponization of the Holocaust, including branding Palestinians as Nazis, has little efficacy when you carry out a live streamed genocide against 2.3 million people trapped in a concentration camp.

“Despotisms can exist long after their past due date. But they are terminal.”

Nations need more than force to survive. They need a mystique. This mystique provides purpose, civility and even nobility to inspire citizens to sacrifice for the nation. The mystique offers hope for the future. It provides meaning. It provides national identity.

Image
Abbas in November 2023. (State Department/ Chuck Kennedy)

When mystiques implode, when they are exposed as lies, a central foundation of state power collapses. I reported on the death of the communist mystiques in 1989 during the revolutions in East Germany, Czechoslovakia and Romania.

The police and the military decided there was nothing left to defend. Israel’s decay will engender the same lassitude and apathy.

It will not be able to recruit Indigenous collaborators, such as Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority — reviled by most Palestinians — to do the bidding of the colonizers.

All Israel has left is escalating savagery, including torture and lethal violence against unarmed civilians, which accelerates the decline. This wholesale violence works in the short term, as it did in the war waged by the French in Algeria, the Dirty War waged by Argentina’s military dictatorship, the British occupation of India, Egypt, Kenya and Northern Ireland and the American occupations of Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.

But in the long term, it is suicidal.


Craig Murray spoke on Gaza at the same event as Hedges in Blackburn, England last week. (Gordon Dimmack video)

The genocide in Gaza has turned Hamas’ resistance fighters into heroes in the Global South. Israel may wipe out the Hamas leadership. But the past — and current — assassinations of scores of Palestinian leaders has done little to blunt resistance.

The genocide in Gaza has produced a new generation of deeply traumatized and enraged young men and women whose families have been killed and whose communities have been obliterated. They are prepared to take the place of martyred leaders.

Israel was at war with itself before Oct. 7. Israelis were protesting to prevent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s abolition of judicial independence. Its religious bigots and fanatics, currently in power, had mounted a determined attack on Israeli secularism.

Israel’s unity is a negative unity. It is held together by hatred. And even this hatred is not enough to keep protestors from decrying the government’s abandonment of Israeli hostages in Gaza.

Hatred is a dangerous political commodity. The Palestinian “human animals,” when eradicated or subdued, will be replaced by Jewish apostates and traitors. A politics of hatred creates a permanent instability, exploited by those seeking the destruction of civil society.

Image
Leibowitz in undated photo by Grubner. (Wellcome Library, London, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

Israel was far down this road on Oct. 7 when it promulgated a series of discriminatory laws against non-Jews that resemble the racist Nuremberg Laws that disenfranchised Jews in Nazi Germany.

The Communities Acceptance Law permits exclusively Jewish settlements to bar applicants for residency on the basis of “suitability to the community’s fundamental outlook.”

Yeshayahu Leibowitz, whom Isaiah Berlin called “the conscience of Israel,” warned that if Israel did not separate church and state and end the occupation, it would give rise to a corrupt rabbinate that would warp Judaism into a fascistic cult.

“Religious nationalism is to religion what National Socialism was to socialism,” wrote Leibowitz, who died in 1994. He understood that the blind veneration of the military, especially after the 1967 war that captured the West Bank and East Jerusalem, was dangerous.

“Our situation will deteriorate to that of a second Vietnam, to a war in constant escalation without prospect of ultimate resolution,” he warned.

He foresaw that,

“the Arabs would be the working people and the Jews the administrators, inspectors, officials, and police — mainly secret police. A state ruling a hostile population of 1.5 million to 2 million foreigners would necessarily become a secret-police state, with all that this implies for education, free speech and democratic institutions. The corruption characteristic of every colonial regime would also prevail in the State of Israel.

The administration would have to suppress Arab insurgency on the one hand and acquire Arab Quislings on the other. There is also good reason to fear that the Israel Defense Force, which has been until now a people’s army, would, as a result of being transformed into an army of occupation, degenerate, and its commanders, who will have become military governors, resemble their colleagues in other nations.”


“Israel,” he wrote, “would not deserve to exist, and it will not be worthwhile to preserve it.”

Settler colonial states that endure, including the United States, exterminate the native population through genocide and the spread of new infectious diseases such as smallpox.

By 1600 less than a 10th of the indigenous population remained in South, Central and North America. Israel cannot kill on this scale, with nearly 5.5 million Palestinians living under occupation and another 9 million in the diaspora. They cannot, as many Israelis wish, wipe them all out.

Israel’s scorched earth campaign in Gaza means there will be no two-state solution. Apartheid and genocide will define existence for the Palestinians. This presages a long conflict, but one that the Jewish State cannot ultimately win.

“This presages a long conflict, but one that the Jewish State cannot ultimately win.”

Run, the Israelis demand of the Palestinians, run for your lives. Run from Rafah the way you ran from Gaza City, the way you ran from Jabalia, the way you ran from Deir al-Balah, the way you ran from Beit Hanoun, the way you ran from Bani Suheila, the way you ran from Khan Yunis.

Run or we will kill you. We will drop GBU-39 bombs on your tent encampments and set them ablaze.

We will spray you with bullets from our machine-gun-equipped drones. We will pound you with artillery and tank shells. We will shoot you down with snipers.

We will decimate your tents, your refugee camps, your cities and towns, your homes, your schools, your hospitals and your water purification plants.

We will rain death from the sky.

Run for your lives. Again and again and again. Pack up the few belongings you have left. Blankets. A couple of pots. Some clothes.

We don’t care how exhausted you are, how hungry you are, how terrified you are, how sick you are, how old, or how young you are.

Run. Run. Run.

And when you run in terror to one part of Gaza, we will make you turn around and run to another. Trapped in a labyrinth of death. Back and forth. Up and down. Side to side. Six. Seven. Eight times.

We toy with you like mice in a trap. Then we deport you so you can never return. Or we kill you.

Let the world denounce our genocide. What do we care? The billions in military aid flows unchecked from our American ally. The fighter jets. The artillery shells. The tanks. The bombs. An endless supply.

We kill children by the thousands. We kill women and the elderly by the thousands. The sick and injured, without medicine and hospitals die.

We poison the water. We cut off the food. We make you starve. We created this hell. We are the masters. Law. Duty. A code of conduct. They do not exist for us.

Image
Smoke and flames billow after Israeli forces struck a high-rise tower in Gaza City, Oct. 7, 2023. (Ali Hamad, Palestinian News & Information Agency, Wafa for APAimages, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

But first we toy with you. We humiliate you. We terrorize you. We revel in your fear. We are amused by your pathetic attempts to survive.

You are not human. You are creatures. Untermensch. We feed our lust for domination. Look at our posts on social media. They have gone viral.

One shows soldiers grinning in a Palestinian home with the owners tied up and blindfolded in the background. We loot. Rugs. Cosmetics. Motorbikes. Jewelry. Watches. Cash. Gold. Antiquities.

We mock your misery. We cheer your death. We celebrate our religion, our nation, our identity, our superiority, by negating and erasing yours.

Depravity is moral. Atrocity is heroism. Genocide is redemption.

This is the game of terror played by Israel in Gaza. It was the game played during the Dirty War in Argentina when the military junta “disappeared” 30,000 of its own citizens.

The “disappeared” were subjected to torture — who cannot call what is happening to Palestinians in Gaza torture? — and humiliated before they were murdered.

It was the game played in the clandestine torture centers and prisons in El Salvador and Iraq. It is what characterized the war in Bosnia in the Serbian concentration camps.

“Depravity is moral. Atrocity is heroism. Genocide is redemption. This is the game of terror played by Israel in Gaza.

Israeli journalist Yinon Magal on the show “Hapatriotim” on Israel’s Channel 14, joked that Joe Biden’s red line was the killing of 30,000 Palestinians.

The singer Kobi Peretz asked if that was the number of dead for a day. The audience erupted in applause and laughter.

We know Israel’s intent. Annihilate the Palestinians the same way the United States annihilated Native Americans, the Australians annihilated the First Nations peoples, the Germans annihilated the Herero in Namibia, the Turks annihilated Armenians and the Nazis annihilated the Jews.

The specifics are different. The goal is the same. Erasure.

We cannot plead ignorance.

But it is easier to pretend. Pretend Israel will allow humanitarian aid. Pretend there will be a permanent ceasefire. Pretend Palestinians will return to their destroyed homes in Gaza.

Pretend Gaza will be rebuilt — the hospitals, the universities, the mosques, the housing. Pretend the Palestinian Authority will administer Gaza. Pretend there will be a two-state solution.

Pretend there is no genocide.



Richard Medhurst also spoke at the event. (Gordon Dimmack video)

The vaunted democratic values, morality and respect for human rights, claimed by Israel and the United States, has always been a lie. The real credo is this – we have everything and if you try and take it away from us we will kill you.

People of color, especially when they are poor and vulnerable, do not count. The hopes, dreams, dignity and aspirations for freedom of those outside the empire are worthless. Global domination will be sustained through racialized violence.

This lie — that the American empire is predicated on democracy and liberty — is one the Palestinians, and those in the Global South, as well as Native Americans and Black and Brown Americans, not to mention those who live in the Middle East, have known for decades.

But it is a lie that still has currency in the United States and Israel, a lie used to justify the unjustifiable.

Image
Light projection, Washington, D.C., Dec. 31, 2023. (Diane Krauthamer, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

We do not halt Israel’s genocide because we, as Americans, are Israel, infected with the same white supremacy, and intoxicated by our domination of the globe’s wealth and the power to obliterate others with our advanced weaponry.

The world outside of the industrialized fortresses in the Global North is acutely aware that the fate of the Palestinians is their fate.

As climate change imperils survival, as natural resources, including access to water, diminish, as mass migration becomes an imperative for millions, as agricultural yields decline, as coastal areas are flooded, as droughts and wildfires proliferate, as states fail, as militias and armed resistance movements rise to battle their oppressors along with their proxies, genocide will not be an anomaly.

It will be the norm. The earth’s vulnerable and poor, those Frantz Fanon called “the wretched of the earth,” will be the next Palestinians.

“The world outside of the industrialized fortresses in the Global North is acutely aware that the fate of the Palestinians is their fate.”

“Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths,” the Roman historian Tacitus wrote of those the emperor Nero singled out for torture and death. “Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired.”

Sadism by the powerful is the curse of the human condition. It was as prevalent in ancient Rome as it is in Gaza.

We know the modern face of Nero, who illuminated his opulent garden parties by burning to death captives tied to stakes. That is not in dispute.

Image
Visiting the domed octagonal room of the ruins of Nero’s Golden House in Rome, 2017. (Andy Montgomery, Flickr, cropped, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

But who were Nero’s guests? Who wandered through the emperor’s grounds as human beings, as in Rafah, were burned alive? How could these guests see, and no doubt hear, such horrendous suffering and witness such appalling torture and be indifferent, even content?

There is nothing hidden about this genocide. Over 147 courageous Palestinian journalists have been murdered by the Israelis because they have conveyed the images and stories of this slaughter to the world, martyred for their people, for us.

We are Nero’s guests.

The Palestinians have long been betrayed, not only by us in the global north, but by most of the governments in the Muslim world.

We stand passive in the face of the crime of crimes. History will judge Israel for this genocide.

But it will also judge us.

It will ask why we did not do more, why we did not sever all agreements, all trade deals, all accords, all cooperation with the apartheid state, why we did not halt weapons shipments to Israel, why we did not recall our ambassadors, why when the maritime trade in the Red Sea was disrupted by Yemen an alternative overland route into Israel was set up by Saudi Arabia and Jordan, why we did not do everything in our power to end the slaughter.

It will condemn us for not heeding the fundamental lesson of the Holocaust, which is not that Jews are eternal victims, but that when you have the capacity to stop genocide and you do not, you are culpable.

“The opposite of good is not evil,” Samuel Johnson wrote. “The opposite of good is indifference.”

The Palestinian resistance is our resistance. The Palestinian struggle for dignity, freedom and independence is our struggle. The Palestinian cause is our cause.

For, as history has also shown, those who were once Nero’s guests soon became Nero’s victims.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/06/19/c ... os-guests/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Jun 21, 2024 11:00 am

Israel Has Committed Mass Arrests Since the Beginning of Eid Al-Adha

Image
Palestinian Mothers Seeing how their sons are detained by the IDF, June 202
Photo: @Irish_Fox_Hound

June 19, 2024 Hour: 9:38 pm

PPS said that the number of Palestinians detained since the onset of Israel’s relentless aggression on October 7, 2023, has reached 9,280, including children and women.

On Wednesday, according to the Society of Palestinian Prisoners, reported that at least 90 civilians, including women and children, were arrested since the beginning of the Muslim holiday of Eid Al-adha, last Sunday.

PPS said that the number of Palestinians detained since the onset of Israel’s relentless aggression on October 7, 2023, has reached 9,280, including children and women.

The detainees either were detained and taken by the army from their homes and at military checkpoints, or forced under pressure to hand themselves to Israel.

These detention campaigns come amidst the comprehensive aggression launched by the occupation against the Palestinian people as a retaliatory measure, which falls under the crime of collective punishment.


Detention operations have been and continue to be one of the most prominent and systematic policies used by the occupation to undermine any rising resistance against it.

In addition, the Prisoners’ Society denounced the blatant harassment of those captured in IDF-run prisons, for example Amir Abdullah Jamal Marjan, 23, who claimed that he had suffered beatings, electric shocks, insults and an attempt to inject him with unknown substances.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/israel-h ... d-al-adha/

******

Hizbullah Ready To Defeat Israel

On October 8, a day after Hamas attacked Israel, the Lebanese Hizbullah joined the fray. It sent missiles towards military installations in north Israel. 80,000 Israeli settler living in the north fled from their homes. They are still sitting in hotels around Israel and are waiting for the return of quietness to that front.

Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah had announced that the current northern tit-for-tat campaign between Hizbullah and Israeli forces would continue until a permanent ceasefire is agreed upon in Gaza.

But the radicals in charge of Israeli policies do not want a ceasefire in Gaza. They want to eradicate Hamas and as much of the Gazan population as possible. A ceasefire would prevent them from doing so.

On the other hand there is pressure from northern settlers who want to return to their homes. But without a ceasefire in Gaza the low level conflict in Israel's north and southern Lebanon is bound to continue.

Instead of working towards a ceasefire in Gaza the Israeli military and government are planning to invade southern Lebanon and to occupy it up to the Litani river.

The plan is delusional. Hizbullah is grounded in the Shia communities which inhabit south Lebanon. Is Israel expecting that population to move out? That is not going to happen.

Hizbullah, with its number of forces exceeding 100,000 men, is well prepared for a fight. South Lebanon is criss-crossed with well prepared fighting positions and tunnels. More than 150,000 missiles, many of them long range, are ready to be launched against military and economic targets in Israel. The 2006 invasion of south Lebanon ended in an utter defeat for the Israeli army. There is no reason to believe that a renewed fight would have a different outcome.

In case of a new conflict Hizbullah has plans to cross the border and to occupy parts of norther Israel. It is also ready to expand a war should this be necessary:

The leader of Hezbollah, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, warned of a war “without rules or ceilings” in the event of a full-scale Israeli offensive against the Lebanese militia, as he threatened that Cyprus could become a target if it allowed Israel to use its territory in any conflict.
Cyprus and Israel have a bilateral defence cooperation agreement which has seen the countries conduct joint exercises.

“Opening Cypriot airports and bases to the Israeli enemy to target Lebanon would mean that the Cypriot government is part of the war, and the resistance will deal with it as part of the war,” the Hezbollah chief said.

Nikos Christodoulides, the island’s president, responded on Wednesday evening: “Cyprus remains uninvolved in any military conflicts and positions itself as part of the solution rather the problem.”


Starting a war with Hizbullah may well spell the end of Israel as a settler state. Missile attacks on its infrastructure and military will lessen the confidence the settlers still may have in the Zionist state. Many are likely to return to their home countries if a conflict endures.

Despite such danger to its Zionist project the U.S. administration is backing any and all Israeli plans:

The US has indicated it is open to backing an Israeli offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon, amid mounting frustration that the group continues to link a truce with Israel to an elusive broader ceasefire in Gaza.
In his meetings in Beirut on Tuesday, US envoy Amos Hochstein delivered "blunt" warnings to Lebanese officials that Israel is preparing to launch a limited offensive on Hezbollah and will have the US's support if a diplomatic solution isn't found, a senior Arab official told Middle East Eye.

Hochstein met with Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri on Tuesday, both of whom the US has used as intermediaries with Hezbollah, the Iran-backed group the US designates a terrorist organisation.

Hochstein told Lebanese officials that Israel anticipates roughly five more weeks of intense fighting in Gaza, after which it will pause its main offensive across the enclave. However, it will continue to target senior Hamas officials and conduct attacks to recover hostages.


From the perspective of the current Israeli government a continuation of the war on Gaza requires an additional war in Lebanon:

Hochstein warned that once fighting in Gaza pauses, Israeli officials intend to turn their full focus to the northern border with the aim of pushing Hezbollah back from the area so the roughly 60,000-96,000 displaced Israelis can return to their homes before the start of school in the fall.
Israel and Hezbollah have exchanged near-daily fire since 8 October, but the conflict ratcheted up last week after Israel killed Taleb Sami Abdullah, one of the most senior members of Hezbollah. The group responded by launching hundreds of drones and rockets at Israel.

The Israeli military said on Tuesday night that it had approved plans for an offensive in Lebanon. Earlier in the day, Israel launched strikes on Hezbollah drone launch squads, the Israeli military said.

In a speech on Thursday, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah doubled down on military action saying Hezbollah has "a complete bank of targets", against Israel that include in the Mediterranean.

"The enemy should expect us on land, sea and air, and we will fight without restraints, rules or limits," he said.


Hizbullah published a 9 minutes long drone video which showed military and economic targets around the Israeli harbor city of Haifa. That multiple Hizbullah drones could fly over Israel without being bothered by air defenses is a huge loss of face for the Israeli military.

The members of the resistance axis, Hizbullah in Lebanon, Shia groups in Syria, Iraqi militia and the Houthi in Yemen, are ready to fight. Even without attacking Iran, the main power behind the resistance, Israel and the U.S. are likely to lose such a war.

Without a chance to win they would of course, as usual, escalate the war most likely towards Iran, potentially Turkey, and elsewhere. Where it would go from there is unpredictable.

Why they would even launch such an avoidable war is beyond me.

Posted by b on June 20, 2024 at 8:03 UTC | Permalink

******

Hezbollah: No Safe Place in ‘Israel’, We’ll Fight with “No Rules, No Red Lines”
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 19, 2024

Image
Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah during a televised speech via Al-Manar (June 19, 2024).

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah delivered a speech today, June 19th, 2024, during the memorial ceremony for martyred leader Hajj Abu Taleb. RNN has provided translated highlights of the speech below, followed by extended highlights.

“The enemy knows that what awaits it in the Mediterranean Sea is also very significant. It must await us on land, in the air, and at sea. If war is imposed, the resistance will fight without restrictions, rules, or limits.”

“All of the enemy and mediators’ threats and warnings about a war on Lebanon do not scare us. They have sent over 200 threats over 8 months…The enemy knows well that we have prepared ourselves for the worst of days. The enemy knows well what awaits them. They were deterred for 9 months due to our unprecedented actions… The enemy knows that there will not be a place in the entity forbidden to our missiles and drones. It will not be indiscriminate bombing; every missile has a target, every rocket has a target, every drone has a target. And the evidence is the ‘Hudhud.'”

“The Lebanon front has prevented enemy forces from participating in Gaza, including elite forces, due to the enemy’s fear of the resistance entering the Al-Jalil, which remains a possibility if a war is imposed on Lebanon.”

“We have fought with a portion of our weapons so far and acquired new weapons that will appear on the battlefield. We have developed our weapons and used new ones in this battle. We have a large number of drones because we manufacture them. We also manufacture types of rockets that we require.”

“The Cypriot government must be careful that opening its airports and bases to the enemy to target Lebanon means it has become part of the war, and the resistance will deal with it as such.”

“This is the greatest battle the nation has fought since 1948. It has a clear and bright horizon and will change the face of the region and shape its future.”


We extend our thanks to everyone who sent messages, called, or issued statements expressing their condolences. I also extend my congratulations to the family of martyr Abu Taleb individually on the martyrdom of Hajj and offer condolences for his loss.

We also extend our condolences to the families of the fighters who were martyred with Hajj Abu Taleb, and to these brothers from Hajj’s team who were always directly with him.

The stance of the martyrs’ families in terms of patience, satisfaction, and declaring determination to continue making sacrifices is honorable.

Martyrdom in the Islamic understanding is happiness, good news, divine selection, and a divine privilege. Therefore, martyrdom is a great victory and a decisive triumph.

Martyrdom is a victory and triumph, it is not defeat or death. This is the strength in the fronts of resistance and its arenas. The most dangerous thing the enemy faces is that those who fight in the fields carry this belief and faith. Therefore, we see this patience and satisfaction among the families of the martyrs.

Our path has the ability to endure in resistance, in the resistance environment, and in the fighting human masses. Despite losing these martyrs, our flag never falls, nor does any position or weakness infiltrate us. With these realities, Martyr Abu Taleb joined the resistance.

Martyr Abu Taleb began as an ordinary fighter like everyone else and quickly advanced due to his spirit.

Abu Taleb was a commander of the Siddiqine front in his early youth. In 1992, he was part of the jihad cadre that went to Bosnia.

Before 2000, he was responsible for the Bint Jbeil front in resistance operations and a front commander during the July War in 2006. After that, in 2016, he became the head of the Nasr unit until the moment of his martyrdom.

There is no doubt that our loss of Hajj is great, but we are consoled by the fact that they passed as martyrs and achieved their highest aspirations, leaving behind those who carry the same spirit, determination, and mind. Therefore, the resistance’s response to the assassination was significant, to tell the enemy that this unit, which you killed some of its officials, has become more determined to confront the enemy.

Abu Taleb was the first field commander who opened the front in support of Gaza.

This battle on the Lebanese front played a major role in the broader confrontation, continuing to inflict material, moral, and psychological losses on the enemy while making sacrifices.

One of the clearest indications of the Lebanese front’s effectiveness is the screams, threats, and intimidation we hear from the enemy’s leaders, officials, and settlers. If it were not effective, why would the world intervene to separate it from the Gaza front? We would not have heard their screaming and wailing.

Since the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Flood, there has been a media machine whose function is to belittle the support fronts and what is happening in Gaza.

42 settlements have been completely evacuated, and life has been disrupted in other settlements.

According to enemy leaders, the Lebanon front has occupied more than 100,000 soldiers and several brigades of the enemy forces, while the enemy is in need of forces in Gaza, the West Bank, and Rafah.

A senior “israeli” leader said that without this front, “there would have been enough forces to defeat Gaza.”

We continue to inflict human, material, and psychological losses on the enemy.

The Lebanon front has prevented enemy forces from participating in Gaza, including elite forces, due to the enemy’s fear of the resistance entering the Al-Jalil, which remains a possibility if a war is imposed on Lebanon.

The “israeli” enemy does not acknowledge its losses on the northern front in order not to put pressure on the government and Netanyahu, who considers the war on Gaza his top priority.

Part of the enemy’s media and psychological warfare is not acknowledging its dead and losses, while the war media publishes the operations.

Achievements include displacing settlers and disrupting industry, agriculture, and tourism in the north, given its significance.

Another achievement is that, for the first time in the history of the occupation (since 1948), a security belt has been formed in the entity.

The enemy fears that things might escalate into a war, which strongly affects the Gaza front and forces it to economize on ammunition.

The image of the “israeli” army and its credibility have been shattered.

Our front and other fronts are strongly present at the negotiation table, where specific outcomes are sought.

The American fleets that came to the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea to prevent Yemenis from targeting “israeli” ships have failed to protect these ships or those heading to the entity, despite all their capabilities. This is a significant failure for the two most important naval fleets in the world.

The “israeli” enemy, unable to fight on these fronts, has left the Yemen front to the British and Americans.

The Iraq front significantly depletes “israeli” air defenses and regional air defenses, and the “israeli” enemy does not acknowledge the incoming missiles and drones.

The occupation has failed against the sacrifices of the honorable people and the resistance fighters in Gaza and Rafah.

The occupation considers that eliminating four brigades in Rafah constitutes an absolute victory. This is deceitful and not a true victory.

The enemy is chasing a false and fabricated victory that has no reality, merely to present it to its audience as a win.

We are witnessing a very significant truth being written by Gaza and the West Bank, causing enormous losses to the entity.

The enemy entity has suffered enormous human and strategic losses, which it will eventually be unable to conceal. There are 8,636 disabled individuals according to official statistics, so what about the number of dead and wounded?

I met with Haj Abu Taleb before his martyrdom, and he explained to me in exhaustive detail about the frontline positions we have extensive information on. The enemy knows this and has evacuated these positions, but not completely due to fear of losing control over them.

Striking these positions resulted in enemy soldiers being killed and injured, forcing them to spread out around the sites, which means gathering new information. The resistance was able to gather this information to the extent that we even know where their tent is located.

The enemy was forced to evacuate its bases and went on to establish new ones behind the mountains. They did not anticipate the drones, but by the grace of Allah, our “Hudhud” provides us with information, and we target them with “the soaring birds.”

There are no electronic and technical barriers on the borders like those on the borders of Lebanon and Gaza. Therefore, in the past four months, the resistance in Lebanon has been working to blind the enemy and close its ears, and now we are capable of striking the “Meron” base whenever we want.

We will not spare anything we can reach, and we have a vast amount of information. What was published yesterday was selectively minutes from Haifa, while the drone flew for hours.

Some in the enemy entity claimed that Hezbollah has spies in Haifa to obtain the footage. But what will they say when the resistance later releases episodes from the second, third, and fourth cities?

We have long hours of footage of Haifa and its surroundings, before and after Haifa. Our resistance fights based on vision and information.

We have fought with a portion of our weapons so far and acquired new weapons that will appear on the battlefield. We have developed our weapons and used new ones in this battle. We have a large number of drones because we manufacture them. We also manufacture types of rockets that we require.

We have an unprecedented human force for the resistance. A few years back, we said 100,000 [fighters] even though they were more, now we have way beyond that.

A lot of our friends in the Axis offered to send tens and hundreds of thousands of fighters to Lebanon. We thanked them but informed them that there is no need. We have sufficient and motivated human capacity. The number of fighters that we have is beyond the number needed for this battle, even with the theory of an all-out war.

The enemy tried to wage for years a “battle between wars” in Syria, targeting our Syrian brothers, our Iranian brothers, striking what they think are weapons and technology convoys for the capabilities of the resistance. 8 months as of today, and our front says to the enemy: all of this “battle between wars” that you attempted over years has failed. All of the weapons intended to reach Lebanon have reached Lebanon.

All of the enemy and mediators’ threats and warnings about a war on Lebanon do not scare us. They have sent over 200 threats over 8 months…The enemy knows well that we have prepared ourselves for the worst of days. The enemy knows well what awaits them. They were deterred for 9 months due to our unprecedented actions…

The enemy knows that there will not be a place in the entity forbidden to our missiles and drones. It will not be indicriminate bombing; every missile has a target, every rocket has a target, every drone has a target. And the evidence is the “Hudhud.”

The enemy knows that what awaits it in the Mediterranean Sea is also very significant. It must await us on land, in the air, and at sea. If war is imposed, the resistance will fight without restrictions, rules, or limits.

The Cypriot government must be careful that opening its airports and bases to the enemy to target Lebanon means it has become part of the war, and the resistance will deal with it as such.

This is the greatest battle the nation has fought since 1948. It has a clear and bright horizon and will change the face of the region and shape its future.

We reaffirm the solidity of our stance and our readiness to continue this historic, humanitarian, and moral position until victory.

Resistance News Network

The speech of his eminence – Lebanese News and Updates

– We thank all those who telegraphed, called, or issued statements for their sympathy and condolences.

I address the family of the martyr Abu Talib, one by one, to congratulate them on the martyrdom of Al-Hajj and offer my condolences for his loss.

– We also address the families of the Mujahideen who were martyred with Hajj Abu Talib and those brothers from Hajj’s team who are always and directly with him.

– The position of the families of the martyrs in terms of accountability, satisfaction, and declaration of resolve and determination to continue the sacrifices is honorable.

– Martyrdom in the Islamic understanding is happiness, good news, divine selection, and refuge towards God. Therefore, all of martyrdom is a great victory and a decisive one.

– Martyrdom is a victory. It is neither defeat nor eternal death. This is the strength of the resistance fronts, and the most dangerous thing that Israel faces is that whoever fights in the battlefields carries this thought and this faith, and therefore we find this patience and contentment among the families of the martyrs.

– We have the ability to endure in the resistance, the environment of the resistance.

Despite this loss of these martyrs, no flag or position will fall from our hands, nor will weakness creep upon us.

– The martyr Abu Talib started out as an ordinary fighter like everyone else and began to advance quickly because of his spirituality. He joined at 15 y/o

In his early youth, Abu Talib was the leader of the Siddiqin axis, and in the 1990s he was one of the few who left for Bosnia.

– Before the year 2000, he was responsible for the Bint Jbeil axis in resistance operations and led an axis during the July War in 2006.

After that, in 2016, he became responsible for the Nasr Unit until his martyrdom.

– There is no doubt that our loss of Abu Taleb is big, but we console ourselves that he died as a martyr and achieved th highest aspirations.

– Therefore, the resistance’s response to the assassination was great, to tell the enemy that this unit, in which you killed some of its officials, has increased its determination to fight the enemy.

– Abu Talib was the first field commander who opened the front to support Gaza.

– This battle on its Lebanese front played a major role in the context of the great confrontation, and it continues to inflict material, moral, and psychological losses on the enemy… and makes sacrifices of course.

– One of the clearest indications of the effectiveness of the Lebanese front is the screaming, threats, and intimidation that we hear from Israeli leaders, officials, and settlers.

If it is not effective, why will the world intervene to separate it from the Gaza front?

– Since the beginning of the Al-Aqsa flood, there has been a media machine whose job is to belittle the support fronts and what is happening in Gaza.

One of the senior Israeli leaders said, had it not been for this Lebanese front, sufficient forces would have been available to defeat Gaza.

The Israeli enemy does not acknowledge its losses on the northern front so as not to put pressure on the government and Netanyahu, who considers his top priority to be the war on Gaza. They don’t want to direct the effort just yet to Lebanon.

However they acknowledge the losses in Gaza, to a certain extent.

Part of the enemy’s media and psychological war is to not acknowledging its deaths and losses, so our military media publishes operations to keep the pressure.

– Among the achievements is the displacement of settlers…and the disruption of industry, agriculture and tourism in the north because of the status it represents.

One of the achievements is that for the first time in the history of the occupation (1948), a security belt was formed in Israel.

– The enemy is afraid that things will turn into war with Lebanon, and this is what has a strong impact on the Gaza front and forces it to economize on ammunition.

– One of the results is that the image of the Israeli army is destroyed and its credibility is destroyed.

Our front and the rest of the fronts are strongly present at the negotiating table through which specific results are intended to be reached.

– The American navy fleets that came to the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea to prevent the Yemenis from targeting Israeli ships… and despite all their capabilities, they were unable to protect Israeli ships or those heading to the entity. This is a major failure for the two most important naval fleets in the world.

– Because the Israeli enemy was unable to wage war on these fronts, the British and Americans took care of the Yemen front.

– The Iraq front is greatly depleting the Israeli air defenses and the air defenses in the region. The Israeli enemy does not recognize the missiles and drones that arrive from that front.

The occupation is helpless in the face of the sacrifices of the resistance fighters in Gaza and Rafah.

– We are facing a very important reality that affects Gaza and the West Bank, and there are huge losses being inflicted on the entity.

– The enemy understood since October 8 that his positions would be targeted and that we had sufficient information about them, their fortifications, their equipment, and their equipment.

– We continue to strike enemy positions within a specific program.

– The enemy’s Ministry of Defense says that there are 8,663 disabled officers and soldiers, and we ask what the number of wounded they may be.

– The enemy evacuated many of its military positions on the border with southern Lebanon.

– The resistance obtained new and accurate information about the locations of the Israeli enemy on the border.

– There are no technological measures in the world like those on the border with Gaza, and what happened in October caused great surprise to the enemy.

– Everything our eyes see and our hands reach, we will target on this front.

– The video we posted yesterday is short, selected excerpts from long hours above Haifa. The raw footage is hours and hours long.

– We spent many hours photographing Haifa, before Haifa, after Haifa, and after after Haifa. We are fighting based on accurate vision, information, and coordinates.

– We obtained new weapons in these months, which I will not reveal now.

We developed some of our weapons and used new weapons that we had not used previously.

The enemy’s latest scandal is that he claimed to have discovered our recon UAVs, but did not shoot it down so as not to disturb the settlers in Haifa.

– We have fought with part of our weapons so far. There is a lot more, which we will only use when the battle demands to defend Lebanon.

We manufacture the drones ourselves and we have a huge number of them, and all the weapons that were supposed to reach Lebanon have arrived.

We manufacture part of our rockets too.

– The enemy launched a battle between wars in Syria (2013-Present) and failed in it, and everything that should have reached Lebanon has arrived.

– We have sufficient, motivated and ready number of fighter… and there is unprecedented human power for resistance… “We have passed the 100,000 by a long way.”

We have a lot of ready fighters, even for the worse worst scenario that could ever happen.

– Leaders of resistance movements contacted us and said, “We want to send fighters.” We told them that what we have is sufficient and even more than we need for the battle.”

– Our people is one of the most important elements of strength in the resistance experience. It is a steadfast and patient environment that offers its homes, money, livelihood, and martyrs.

This environment is still resilient and is a reason to be proud.

– By relying on God Almighty and trusting in His help and victory, and based on the elements of strength we have, the position of the axis of resistance, motivation, and capabilities, and by looking at the reality of the enemy….

… we can say that everything the enemy says and the mediators threatens about with war on Lebanon does not scare us, nor should it scare us

– We prepared ourselves for the most difficult days, and the enemy knows very well what awaits it.


– We are not frightened by anything the enemy says and the threats and warnings brought by the intermediaries.

– We have a complete and real target bank and we have the ability to reach these goals.

What we will accurately attack will shake the whole foundations of the Jewish state.

We can destroy 1000 buildings in Israel and it would survive. But what we will attack is less and will bring Israel to its knees.

– If a war happens in Lebanon, the situation in the Mid sea will be unprecedented. They are busy now with the Red Sea, imagine what will be in the Mid sea

– We will fight with no red lines and no boundaries. On land, air, and sea.

– We have information Israel is conducting maneuvers in Cyprus in Cypriot mountains and airports, and it believes that if its airports are targeted, it will use Cypriot airports and facilities.

The Cypriot government must know that opening Cypriot airports and bases for war on Lebanon, will make them a target.

We will deal with Cyprus as if it were part of the war

– What should be the ones feared in light of the current state

– As for us, we will continue our support for Gaza, and at the same time we are prepared for all possibilities, and nothing will stop us.

The solution is clear and does not require explanation: “A ceasefire in Yemen, Iraq, and Lebanon can be obtained by a ceasefire in Gaza (according to conditions appropriate to the Palestinian resistance).”


https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... red-lines/

Why Egypt is Not a Friend of Palestine: Part II – Sisi Deepens Ties with Israel
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 19, 2024
Vanessa Beeley

Image
Sisi has placed Egypt in a position of political and military paralysis – destroying Egypt’s sovereignty in the process

In Part One I covered Egypt’s debt quagmire that has reduced its ability to act as a sovereign nation, indebted to the Western neocolonialist cartel and their Arab State allies in the region.

Image
Source: Central Bank of Egypt

In Part Two I want to delve into the Sinai Peninsula destabilisation and Egypt’s flourishing military and economic collaboration with Israel.

The Sinai Islamist insurgency (an ISIS offshoot branded Wilayat Sinai or Sinai Province – SP) began at the same time as the Western-orchestrated “Arab Springs” were launched across the region but in particular, in Egypt and Syria.

The campaign “Operation Eagle” began in 2011 following an increase in alleged Islamist militant activities in the Peninsula. Approximately 1000 troops and hundreds of armored personnel carriers were deployed.

This represented the first major deployment of Egyptian troops in Sinai since the end of the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, thus marking a substantial change in the military and security situation in Sinai.

I personally remember trying to cross the Sinai in August 2012 for my first attempt at entering Gaza. Fifteen Egyptian soldiers were killed at the Rafah border during Ramadan by unknown gunmen and the entire area was shut down while Egyptian military scoured the desert for the killers. Entry to Gaza was denied, even to Palestinians.

The recently “elected” Muslim Brotherhood President Morsi ordered full military control of the Sinai. Gaza was put on devastating lockdown with Morsi flooding the lifeline tunnels between Gaza Rafah and Egyptian Rafah with sewage water. This was done under the pretext of preventing the “flow of weapons” from Hamas to the Islamists in the Sinai – despite the fact that Hamas and ISIS have not been considered allies although their agendas may have some cross-over, as in Syria.

At the same time Morsi was effectively exporting terrorist (Muslim Brotherhood) forces to fight alongside Al Qaeda in the Western-sponsored regime change war in Syria. As reported by the Washington Institute:

In May 2013, for example, Qatar-based cleric Yusuf al-Qaradawi — a major Brotherhood ideological influence — called on Sunnis to join the fight in Syria. The next month, then-President Morsi’s office announced that Egyptians returning from the fight in Syria would not be prosecuted, and Mr. Morsi later keynoted a rally at Cairo Stadium at which radical clerics endorsed the Syrian jihad.

After Sisi took control in Egypt, deposing Morsi in a violent military coup, reportedly supported by Israel – the radicalisation of Muslim Brotherhood factions in Egypt increased as did the exodus to fight in Syria.

In 2022 Arab Center DC reported that:

Over the past decade, Sinai has been the epicenter of terrorist attacks in Egypt and the base from which Islamist militants wage their insurgency against the Egyptian government. Their assaults mainly target security forces, including military convoys, checkpoints, and facilities, and have mostly taken place in the cities of northern Sinai, particularly al-Arish, Sheikh Zuweid, and Rafah. However, as a result of Egyptian military operations, over the past few years SP’s activities have moved to the western part of North Sinai, notably to the city of Bir al-Abd, which in November 2017 witnessed one of the deadliest extremist attacks in Egypt’s history when SP militants stormed the al-Rawda Mosque, injuring 128 people and killing more than 300, including 27 children.

Under Sisi the military operations have achieved very little success in quelling the SP insurgency. Sisi has also been accused of human rights abuses in his “war on terror” with indiscriminate attacks that have led to the destruction of Bedouin homes and villages and the deaths of civilians during bombing campaigns and artillery bombardment.

From a Human Rights Watch report (Caveat – HRW is a tool of the US deep state and as such, the information must be considered in context with the direction of travel of Zionist and US agendas in the region)

Egyptian military and police have carried out systematic and widespread arbitrary arrests—including of children—enforced disappearances, torture, and extrajudicial killings, collective punishment, and forced evictions—abuses it has attempted to conceal through an effective ban on independent reporting. The military has also possibly conducted unlawful air and ground attacks that have killed numerous civilians—including children—and used civilian properties for military purposes. In addition, it has recruited, armed, and directed local militias, which have themselves engaged in serious rights violations, such as torture and arbitrary arrests, often exploiting their position to settle personal scores.

This failure to bring militants to justice fuels theories about the Sisi regime’s political interest in prolonging the conflict in Sinai, which may serve to secure domestic political support – war is always a way to retain power particularly when confronting turbulent domestic environments.

It could also have a more sinister purpose. We should always bear in mind that ISIS in Syria is a US alliance proxy as are the majority of terrorist groups globally, acting in the interests of the Zionist regime and neocolonialist adventurism in the West Asia region and further afield.

Strategic ties between Egypt and Israel have deepened under Sisi’s rule. Israel has allowed significant Egyptian military units and armaments to be deployed to the northeastern section of the Sinai Peninsula in contravention of the 1979 Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty, which restricts the number of Egyptian personnel and armaments in this zone.

Egypt allegedly gave Israel permission to carry out drone strikes in the Sinai, officially targeting extremists which could have included Palestinian Resistance fighters. Israel carried out an estimated 100 strikes between 2015 and 2018, with the 2014 savage aggression against Gaza conducted during these operations.

When the New York Times exposed these operations in 2018 it described Egypt and Israel as secret allies in a covert war against a common foe. The Sisi regime issued vehement denials fearing a public backlash from a majority Egyptian population that has historically opposed the Zionist theft and occupation of Palestinian territory.

This information leak also led to a security blackout in the Sinai region which has provided cover for the Sisi regime human rights abuses including the razing of Egyptian Rafah homes and infrastructure and the displacement of thousands of Bedouin tribes.

In 2019 Sisi admitted to CBS ‘60 Minutes’ News program that relations were the closest they had ever been with Israel. From a Reuters report:

Asked whether the cooperation was the closest and deepest that he has had with Israel, Sisi responded: “That is correct.”

“The Air Force sometimes needs to cross to the Israeli side. And that’s why we have a wide range of coordination with the Israelis,”


The Egyptian regime also tried to kill this report, demanding that CBS not air the interview. The request was denied.

Both Egypt and Israel have cooperated in closing down tunnels connecting the Sinai to Gaza, which have been used to smuggle people and goods in both directions. Egypt has also kept the border crossing between Gaza and the Sinai closed for the most part, generally only opening it for certain periods to allow for medical and family visits.

Again, I have personally experienced the dehumanisation and collective humiliation of Palestinians by the Egyptian security forces at the Rafah border crossing. In August 2012 temperatures were in the mid 40s and the area outside the entrance gates to the border terminal had no shade. Buses were constantly arriving carrying more Palestinian families to the area.

Thousands of Palestinians were waiting at the gates to be processed and to return to Gaza. The gates remained closed from morning to night for three days forcing us to sleep in Al Arish which was known as a security risk especially for foreigners.

On the third day, with crowds of Palestinians packed into a small area outside the gates in sweltering temperatures and a cloudless sky – the Egyptians opened a tiny side gate forcing the Palestinian crowds to crush each other in an attempt to push through the gap. Egyptian guards yelled and pushed the scrambling people, treating them just as Zionists treat them in the apartheid Occupied Territories. This inhumane treatment did not improve in the passport processing terminal where Egyptian intelligence forces deliberately delayed the procedures and left Palestinians waiting for hours.

In May 2020, the head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency traveled to Cairo to meet secretly with Egyptian officials, according to Israeli press reports. The meeting was supposedly geared to alerting Cairo about Netanyahu’s annexation plans for the West Bank – the plans were delayed but this serves to demonstrate the close intelligence and political ties between the two countries.

The natural gas field alliance

In 2021 Egypt’s Minister of Energy Tarek al-Molla traveled to Israel to meet with his Israeli counterpart, Yuval Steinitz, as well as with Prime Minister Netanyahu, to discuss a major collaborative project. From the ACDC report:

Gas from Palestine’s large offshore Leviathan field in the eastern Mediterranean would be transported via a new pipeline on the seabed to connect with liquefication facilities in Egypt. Currently, gas from the Leviathan field is being sent to Egypt via a pipeline that runs to the Sinai Peninsula. The goal of this new project, according to an Israeli official, would be to use these facilities to export gas to Europe, where demand is rising.

Undoubtedly, Israel sees this collaboration as a way of linking the Egyptian economy to Israel so that any future Egyptian leader would think twice about rolling back bilateral relations.

From Egypt’s perspective, this deal fits into its plans to become a major regional hub for natural gas. In 2015, a large gas field, called Zohr, was discovered in Egyptian territorial waters in the Mediterranean, and Egypt has been the force behind the establishment of the “East Mediterranean Gas Forum” which includes Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority which is nothing more than a traitorous subordinate of the Zionist regime.

The tourism incentive

In early March 2021, Israeli Minister of Intelligence Eli Cohen met with Egypt’s Deputy Minister of Intelligence Nasser Fahmi in the coastal resort of Sharm el-Sheikh and said Egypt was doing “everything possible” to make the Sinai safe for Israeli tourists.

Interestingly, Cohen was reportedly accompanied by 60 Israeli officials and businesspeople, indicating that both countries hope to boost tourism in the coming years. (ACDC)

Again Egypt ensured scarce media coverage of the Cohen delegation. The risk of public backlash was still high with the Egyptian public sympathy consistently engrained in the Palestinian nationalist movement.

Cohen was cited as saying:

“Egypt is interested in promoting cooperation with Israel in all fields. We will continue to act to bolster economic and bilateral ties in the future.”

Polling in 2020 conducted by the respected Zogby Research Services found some interesting data on Egyptian public attitudes toward Israel and the Palestinian issue. The question “How important is it that there be a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?” revealed that 79 percent of Egyptians thought it was “very important”; 15 percent said “somewhat important”; and only 6 percent said “somewhat unimportant or not important at all.” Concerning the question about the possibility of Israeli annexation of large parts of the West Bank, 75 percent of Egyptians believe that cooperation with Israel should come to an end if that were to occur.


There are limits to how far Sisi can publicly go in collaborating with Israel and a more serious disconnect from the Arab Peace Initiative would incur domestic unrest. At the same time he must avoid any major confrontation with Israel to secure the strategic and economic projects that have ensured financial and political support from the Zionist lobby and supporters in the US. Sisi must also keep the US and EU on board to avoid prosecution for the human rights abuses conducted by his regime.

It should however come as no surprise that, since October 7th, the Sisi regime has banned journalists from entering Gaza:

Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry said “any unilateral action” by Egypt as regards letting journalists into Gaza might be seen [by Israel] as “inappropriate” and might “have adverse consequences to other components” of the arrangement between Egypt and Israel, such as “the entry of assistance.”

Cairo-based journalists confirmed that they had been told to request Israel’s agreement if they wanted to enter Gaza via the Egyptian Rafah border crossing. Those journalists who did seek Israel’s permission were refused entry.

An audio recording of the response that an Israeli press spokesperson gave to a journalist who requested a permit to enter via Rafah. She said she could not issue permits for a crossing point that is not under Israeli control and, referring to what the Egyptians are telling journalists, she said: “I have the impression it’s just a pretext. I think they’re making you go round in circles.”

Both regimes have an agenda of preventing international media coverage of the Zionist brutal genocide that has been ongoing for 9 months in Gaza. Israel is the driver of the blockade but Egypt is complicit in the deliberate news black-out which only serves to protect Israel from exposure as the terrorist entity it really is.

In Part Three I will get to the non-state actors with close ties to the Sisi regime who control Sinai, mediate with Israel and secure monopoly deals to rebuild Gaza post 2021’s Zionist aggression.

In further chapters I will also have a look at some of the organisations that publicly oppose Sisi’s normalisation-with-genocidal-Israel policy and examine who is really responsible for the humanitarian relief blockade on trucks entering Gaza through Rafah since October 7th, Israel or Egypt?

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... th-israel/

*****

Nova festival memes expose Israeli censorship on X

Israel continues to exert control over US-based social media firms to hide its atrocities in Gaza

News Desk

JUN 18, 2024

Image
Burned cars destroyed by Israeli helicopters at the Nova Festival on 7 Octobe (Photo credit: X)

Users of the social media site X discovered earlier this week that whenever they upload a photo showing cars destroyed at the site of the Nova Music Festival on 7 October, a community note pops up, no matter what the post’s text says.

The note states, “This was already debunked in November last year by basically every major news source in multiple countries.”

The community note does not say what “this” refers to. However, it provides links to news stories attempting to debunk strong evidence showing that Israeli helicopters used heavy weapons, including high-caliber incendiary machine gun fire, to open fire on the festival after Hamas fighters attacked it to take Israelis captive during Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.

Many Israeli attendees at the festival were burned alive by Israeli helicopter fire, tanks, and drones during the attack under the Hannibal Directive to kill those being taken captive by Hamas from the settlements (kibbutzim) and near the Gaza border.

Realizing the community note would be added regardless of the text accompanying the photo, X users began to use the photo to create memes.

One X user posted the photo with the text, “Elon Musk is not a pedophile.” The community note, “This was already debunked in November,” was immediately added. The post garnered more than four million impressions and almost 70,000 likes.

That famous photo of the cars that were incinerated by the Israeli army on 7 October is being 'Community Noted' on X regardless of what the caption is — and despite the fact that it is a real photograph. @Karim_Shami

Watch on YouTube: https://t.co/dofF4RvcHL pic.twitter.com/eOEJ3SbKUF

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) June 17, 2024


Another X user posted the photo with the text stating, “George W. Bush was legitimately elected president.”

Many X users commented that this illustrates the extent to which Israel exerts control over the “content moderation” policies of social media companies to censor pro-Palestinian voices and hide the atrocities committed not by Hamas but by Israel during the events of 7 October.

While X is often viewed as supporting free speech, the company relies on an Israeli tech firm for content moderation assistance.

When X CEO Elon Musk visited Israel in November, he met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other political and military leaders.

However, the Israeli business newspaper Globes reported that Musk also met with Israeli tech CEOs during the visit, including Guy Tytunovich of the Israeli cybersecurity company CHEQ.

Globes reports that only three weeks later, “X signed an agreement with CHEQ, which will help it deal with the high rate of fake users. Apparently, Musk’s direct involvement with the Israeli company is what led to the quick closing of the deal between the two companies.”

Globes added that CHEQ “helps social networks and their advertisers deal with bots and fake users, reducing the damage they cause to social networks and advertisers.”

“The Israeli company has claimed in the past that it can combat fake content by neutralizing the bots disseminating them, usually in the service of interested parties such as political campaign managers or psychological warfare by states,” the paper wrote.

Israeli leaders and their lobbyists in the US have been concerned about the extent to which pictures and information of Palestinians being killed by Israeli bombs have spread on social media. They worry the documentation of the ongoing genocide of Palestinians in Gaza is affecting US public opinion toward Israel, in particular among youth.

In March, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a pro-Israel advocacy group and front for Israeli intelligence in the US, led a campaign to pass legislation banning TikTok for US users.

ADL head Jonathon Greenblatt stated during a leaked phone call in November that Israel had a “TikTok problem.” He and others in the Israel lobby mobilized the US Congress and Senate to pass legislation banning the social media site where many young US citizens get their news.

https://thecradle.co/articles/nova-fest ... rship-on-x

US reminds Lebanon: 'We will back Israeli offensive against Hezbollah'

The 'blunt' message from a senior US official came before Hezbollah released unprecedented drone footage of several sensitive targets in northern Israel

News Desk

JUN 20, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Bilal Hussein/AP)

Lebanese leaders this week received a “blunt” warning from US special envoy Amos Hochstein that the White House is ready to support an Israeli offensive in southern Lebanon if a “diplomatic solution” is not found to stop cross-border hostilities with Hezbollah.

“The US will stand by Israel and not condemn them publicly if it launches an offensive against Hezbollah,” Hochstein told senior officials in Beirut, according to an unnamed senior Arab official who spoke with Middle East Eye (MEE).

During his meetings with caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati and Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri, Hochstein also revealed Israel “anticipates roughly five more weeks of intense fighting in Gaza, after which it will pause its main offensive across the enclave.”

After this, “Israeli officials intend to turn their full focus to the northern border with the aim of pushing Hezbollah back from the area so the roughly 60,000–96,000 displaced Israelis can return to their homes before the start of school in the fall,” Hochstein reportedly warned.

The Israeli-born senior US official also said that the anticipated “lull in Gaza fighting” could allow Hezbollah and Israel to start negotiations and reach a detente “without a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas.”

Hochstein's visit to Beirut ended just hours before Hezbollah published unprecedented reconnaissance footage of numerous sensitive sites in Israel’s north, namely the port of Haifa and its naval base.

The video immediately prompted Tel Aviv to announce the approval of battle plans for a wider-scale attack on Lebanon.

“Operational plans for an offensive in Lebanon were approved,” and the military is “accelerating the readiness of the forces on the ground,” the Israeli army said in a statement.

In a speech on Thursday, Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah issued a stern warning against Israel and the US, saying the Lebanese resistance is ready to “fight without restraints, rules or limits” if Israel expands its offensive.

“The enemy must wait for us by air, land, and sea. We repeat: If war is imposed on Lebanon, the resistance will fight without rules, controls, or ceilings,” Nasrallah said, adding that “storming the Galilee is a possibility that remains present within the framework of any war that the occupation may launch against Lebanon.”

“We obtained new weapons, which I will not reveal now. We developed some of our weapons and used new weapons that we had not used previously,” the resistance leader stressed. He also took aim at the US-backed ceasefire proposal for Gaza, saying: “There is an exposed and clear loophole in Biden’s ceasefire proposal that allows Netanyahu to continue the war in Gaza.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-remind ... -hezbollah
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Jun 22, 2024 11:11 am

Ansarallah Commander Sayyed Abdulmalik Badr El-Din Al-Houthi, June 20, 2024
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 20, 2024
Resistance News Network

Image
Ansarallah Commander Sayyed Abdulmalik Badr El-Din Al-Houthi delivered a speech today, June 20th, 2024, where he discussed the regional situation, revealed new details of the sinking of the “Tutor” ship, and revealed that the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier was targeted for the third time earlier this week after it migrated to the Saudi coast.

RNN has provided translated highlights below:


The Saudi regime is not worthy of serving the Hajj and achieving its great Qur’anic and Islamic purposes.

The Saudi regime is politically subservient to the American will, courting the “israeli” enemy, and allying with the enemies of Muslims.

The American, in his deceit, established a floating pier in Gaza under the pretext of humanitarian concern to make it an occupation base and support the enemy entity. In reversing titles, the American calls occupation liberation and killing and genocide aid.

The floating pier has no role in delivering aid and meeting life needs, and at the height of famine, the American moved it to “Ashdod.”

From the suffering of prisoners and abductees in enemy prisons, they are starved and injected with harmful unknown substances against their will.

One manifestation of mocking Islam is holding a barbecue and dance party in the Rafah mosque. Where is the Islamic fervor and sense of responsibility?

The American continues to openly support the Israeli enemy, with bombs and supplies arriving via the air bridge to kill the Palestinian people. America is preparing to send 50 F-15 fighters to support the enemy entity to continue the genocide in Gaza.

The German parliament decides to continue providing weapons to the enemy army, and Serbia boasts of sending arms shipments to the enemy.

The qualitative operations in Rafah continue, and the enemy’s losses are increasing, which is impactful and worrying for them.

At a time when the enemy wants to settle the battle in his favor, they incur significant losses in Gaza.

The increase in the enemy’s losses these days compared to previous months indicates a higher performance by the fighters and greater divine success.

The fighters in Gaza are steadfast despite the blockade and total destruction, and American-British support for the enemy.

The enemy resorted to tactical suspensions of its operations due to the devastating strikes on its soldiers, equipment, and activation of minefields.

The effectiveness of the fighters’ performance in Gaza continues with shelling settlements and the steadfastness of the Palestinian people.

The “israeli” enemy failed to extort the popular support in Gaza and impose changes in managing the situation by starvation and exploitation.

The steadfastness of the fighters in Gaza impacted the enemy, leading its leaders to admit failure and stalemate.

The “israeli” enemy speaks of an existential crisis and lack of confidence in the future, which is the result of the steadfastness of the Palestinian people and their fighters.

There is anticipation for decisions by the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, and while we do not place our hopes on them, any condemnation of the enemy represents a problem for them.

The “israeli” enemy is accustomed to being outside international pressure and criticism, enjoying complete cover.

The “israeli” enemy gives no value to any decisions from the Security Council, the United Nations, or international courts, but any condemnation annoys and affects them.

Demonstrations in America and Western countries continue, and the repression of them also continues.

Hezbollah’s escalation is strong, and the “israeli” enemy is in a dilemma due to its impact on the general situation and the north.

The enemy’s disregard for Hezbollah’s escalation is painful and impactful, and if it goes to full-scale war, it fears the consequences.

The American tries to ease the “israeli” enemy’s dilemma from the Lebanese front, but the pressures cannot weaken Hezbollah’s stance.

The videos released by Hezbollah, which include detailed scans of wide areas in northern Palestine, frightened the enemy. The content of the scans of manufacturing complexes, military bases, and vital targets constitutes a target bank for Hezbollah.

The ability to infiltrate and conduct this scan is troubling for the enemy, who knows what it means.

The supporting front from Iraq announced targeting sensitive targets, including the Port of Haifa.

Over the week, there were 10 operations [by the Yemeni Armed Forces] carried out with 26 ballistic and cruise missiles, drones, and boats targeting 8 ships.

The total number of targeted ships associated with the “israeli,” American, and British enemies is 153.

Among the prominent operations this week was targeting the American aircraft carrier “Eisenhower” for the third time in the northern Red Sea with missiles and pursuing it.

Among the prominent developments is the sinking of the ship “Tutor” after a qualitative operation by naval forces.

Naval personnel managed to board the ship, rigged it with explosives, and detonated it after it was hit by a war boat.

There is a second ship [Verbena] on the verge of sinking in the Gulf of Aden.

The impact of naval operations is significant and escalating on the American and British, and the inability to prevent the operations is evident and acknowledged among the enemies.

The impact of naval operations on the economic situation is increasing to the point that clothing and electronics exporters to America are resorting to costly air shipping.

24 American and British airstrikes were carried out on Yemen [this week] without any effect, praise be to Allah.

The American admits that its naval forces are facing the fiercest combat since World War II.

The American is in a real predicament and a resounding failure, with its leaders admitting the development of Yemeni capabilities.

Our people continue their support activities for Gaza, and from next week will resume their million-strong marches.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... e-20-2024/

Leading US Law Schools Present Undeniable Evidence of Israel’s Genocide in Gaza
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 20, 2024
Kit Klarenberg

Image

On May 15, the University Network for Human Rights (UNHR), a U.S.-based advocacy group training undergraduates in human rights law at colleges and universities worldwide to counter abusive state, corporate, or private conduct, published a 105-page analysis of international law and its application to Israel’s military actions since October 7, 2023. Drawing on extensive evidence and historical legal precedents, the findings leave no doubt that Israel has committed horrific breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention in Gaza.

A collaborative effort by some of the West’s most prestigious law schools, the report has now been submitted to the United Nations. The institution has yet to comment on the UNHR investigation’s irrefutable, bombshell contents. The mainstream media has also remained silent. Given the complicity of Western journalists in whitewashing and justifying unconscionable crimes in Gaza, this is not surprising. However, the silence has been so pervasive that the report may have even gone unnoticed by committed Palestine solidarity activists.

This silence is itself an injustice, as the UNHR has produced a singular, indispensable resource for factually, legally, and morally refuting the arguments and assertions of Zionists and their allies, old and new. The report details, in devastating forensic detail, the variety of deplorable, murderous ways in which the Israeli state and its operatives at every level are culpable for committing genocide in Gaza, from public expressions of “blatant and unequivocal dehumanization and cruelty” to military actions explicitly designed to maximize Palestinian slaughter.

As defined in the Genocide Convention of 1948 and interpreted by international courts and tribunals, the crime of genocide requires that a perpetrator kill, seriously harm, or inflict conditions of life calculated to destroy a group, in whole or in part, with the intent to destroy that group. Thomas Becker, UNHR’s legal director, tells MintPress News: “What’s happening now is both unprecedented and, in many ways, a textbook case of genocide.”

Five days after the publication of the UNHR’s landmark investigation, International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor Karim Khan announced his intent to indict Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for numerous crimes against humanity and atrocities committed since October 7, 2023. While it remains uncertain whether they will ever face justice, the Network’s report should inspire governments and citizens worldwide to work relentlessly towards achieving that righteous goal.

‘DESTROY AND EXTERMINATE’

In 1925, German writer and satirist Kurt Tucholsky reportedly remarked, “The death of one man is a catastrophe; a hundred thousand deaths is a statistic.” This quote has since become entrenched in Western political consciousness and is often attributed to various figures, most prominently Soviet leader Joseph Stalin. However, the casualty and death figures emerging from Gaza, especially when accompanied by gruesome photographic and video evidence of Tel Aviv’s numerous crimes, are far from mere statistics.

“Israel’s attack on Palestinians in Gaza has been one of superlatives,” Becker told MintPress News. “More children have died in four months in Gaza than in four years of the world’s conflicts combined. The starvation rate in Gaza is the fastest the world has seen, and this is the deadliest conflict ever recorded for journalists and aid workers,” he continued.

In just half a year, Israel has killed two percent of Gaza’s children and either killed or injured five percent of its total population. It has displaced 75 percent of the population, destroying 70 percent of Gaza’s homes. Additionally, it has destroyed every university and 80 percent of Gaza’s schools.”

The UNHR report is equally direct. It states, “Israel has committed genocidal acts of killing, causing serious harm to, and inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza, a protected group that forms a substantial part of the Palestinian people.” As of May 1 this year, over five percent of Gaza’s total population had been massacred. Approximately 14,500 of the dead were children.

Image
The bodies of Palestinians killed in Israeli bombings of Gaza are covered on the main road in Gaza City, Jan. 2, 2024. Mohammed Hajjar | AP

Simultaneously, the assault on Gaza has become the deadliest conflict for journalists ever recorded. The number of UN personnel killed has reached levels “never seen in history.” A staggering 1.7 million civilians, over 75 percent of Gaza’s population, have been forcibly displaced as a result of the offensive. Throughout, they have endured catastrophic levels of hunger and deprivation due to deliberate restrictions on access to essential resources, including food, water, medicine, and fuel.

The UNHR extensively documents and persuasively argues how the actions and “patterns of conduct” of the Israeli Occupation Forces “explicitly reflect intentions to destroy and exterminate Palestinians.” This reinforces the Network’s finding of Israel’s genocidal intent in Gaza and asserts that these violations “amount to grave breaches of peremptory norms of international law that must cease immediately.” These violations also give rise to obligations by all other states.

To refrain from recognizing Israel’s breaches as legal or taking any actions that may constitute complicity in these breaches; and to take positive steps to suppress, prevent, and punish the commission by Israel of further genocidal acts against the Palestinian people in Gaza.”

It is crucial to underline that the myriad facts collated by the UNHR were only current as of May 1. Even before the work was finalized and published, “reports emerged of additional, egregious abuses by Israel against Palestinians in the southern city of Rafah and elsewhere, where more than a million Palestinians are seeking refuge.” While these developments are not reflected in the report, they “further demonstrate Israel’s ongoing genocidal conduct and intent and underscore the urgency with which the international community must act.”

‘ELIMINATE EVERYTHING’

One of the most compelling sections of the UNHR report discusses how the statements of Israeli officials about Gaza “amount to genocide.” Neither the International Court of Justice nor the International Law Commission has provided clear guidance on whether “calling for the killing or destruction of individuals or a group can constitute evidence of [genocidal] intent.” However, prior international criminal tribunals have repeatedly found that genocidal intent can be inferred from “certain rhetoric,” especially when considered alongside related and concurrent military action.

For example, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, in prosecuting regional mayor Joseph Kanyabashi, found that his public pronouncements on the capture and murder of Tutsis—which included encouraging the Hutu population to “clear bushes” and hunt down “the enemy”—were proof that he had “the requisite intent to destroy, in whole or in part, the Tutsi ethnic group.” Shocking and self-incriminating, such declarations pale in comparison to the statements made by prominent Israeli officials since the Gaza genocide began.

Individuals at the state’s highest levels, “including the heads of State, government, and military, as well as lower-level government and military officials,” have “publicly and repeatedly expressed intentions to destroy Palestinians and Palestinian society in Gaza; collectively punish Palestinians and cause them to suffer militarily and through the blockading of basic necessities; and push the Palestinian population out of Gaza,” according to the UNHR.

In doing so, they have intentionally blurred the lines between civilians and combatants, while encouraging the Israeli military to cause massive death and destruction. The government’s highest official, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has explicitly evoked Biblical commandments to wipe out an entire nation, including men, women, and children. Other officials have expressed pleasure and pride at the devastation in Gaza and the hope of enacting another Nakba, the violent dispossession of 800,000 Palestinians from their homes between 1947 and 1949.”

The report contains a “non-exhaustive sampling of these statements,” which is lengthy and critical. For example, on the evening of October 7, 2023, the day Hamas’ Operation Al-Aqsa Flood was launched, Netanyahu ordered Gaza’s 2.2 million Palestinian population to “get out now. We will be everywhere and with all our might.” In a public address three weeks later, posted on the Israeli government’s official YouTube account, he stated:

You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember.”

Image
Palestinians attend a mass funeral of victims of Israeli violence in Rafah, Gaza Strip, March 7, 2024. Hatem Ali | AP

The Prime Minister’s Office again cited this Biblical passage on November 3: “Now go, attack Amalek, and proscribe all that belongs to him. Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses.” Meanwhile, on October 9, when Defense Minister Yoav Gallant announced a total blockade on Gaza, he declared:

There will be no electricity, no food, no fuel, everything is closed… we are fighting human animals, and we are acting accordingly… Gaza won’t return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything.”

Furthermore, Israeli President Isaac Herzog has repeatedly emphasized Tel Aviv’s intent to target all Palestinians in Gaza without distinguishing between militants and civilians. For instance, he stated, “It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible. It’s not true this rhetoric about civilians not being aware, not involved. It’s absolutely not true.” The UNHR argues that Israel’s intent to destroy all Palestinians in Gaza “can be inferred from the totality of the circumstances.”

As Becker tells MintPress News, Israeli political and military leaders’ rhetoric is a central component of those circumstances and complementary to the physical actions taken. “Officials at all levels of the government have openly called for the destruction of a specific group of people, followed by an unprecedented military campaign that has decimated that group,” he says. These statements amount to clear threats to completely flatten Gaza and eradicate its daily life and culture. The UNHR report explains:

Taken together, [these comments] indicate the knowledge and intention of causing widespread death and suffering to Palestinians in Gaza [and] attest to Israel’s discriminatory intent towards Palestinians… Expressions by Israeli officials establish that the assault on Gaza is not simply a military operation targeting combatants, but an operation intended to destroy the population… The State of Israel… has committed the act of direct and public incitement to genocide, in violation of Article III(c) of the Genocide Convention.”

‘TAKE MEASURES’

Multiple legal findings and precedents state that countries party to the Genocide Convention have a duty to prevent genocide if they can “contribute to restraining in any degree the commission of genocide.” Additionally, signatory states must “employ all means reasonably available” to prevent genocide. This duty “varies greatly from one state to another” and depends on a state’s “capacity to influence effectively the action of persons likely to commit, or already committing genocide.”

Several factors determine a state’s capacity “to exert influence” over the commission of genocide, including “the geographical distance of the state concerned from the scene of the events” and “the strength of the political links, as well as links of all other kinds, between the authorities of the state and the main actors in the events.” The UNHR notes that countries providing “military support” to a perpetrator “have a higher duty to prevent genocide from occurring.”

The duty to prevent genocide in Gaza encompasses a range of measures. First, it is imperative that states exercise all means of political and diplomatic pressure towards the cessation of Israeli military operations in Gaza. States exporting arms or military equipment to Israel, or providing other forms of military aid or logistical assistance that contribute to or enable Israel’s military operations against Palestinians in Gaza, have an obligation to immediately terminate all forms of aid and assistance.”

The UNHR states that failing to stop providing aid or assistance could violate a state’s obligation under Article I of the Genocide Convention. Countries that have signed the Genocide Convention must also punish those responsible for genocide, which includes helping to hold individuals accountable. They must work together to investigate, prosecute, or extradite suspects. Additionally, countries that are part of the Rome Statute must assist in prosecuting suspects through the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Image
A press helmet is placed over the grave of Hamza Dahdouh, a journalist killed in an Israeli air strike on Rafah. Mohammed Talatene | AP

The duty to prevent genocide starts as soon as a state learns, or should have learned, about a serious risk of genocide. The ICC highlighted this serious risk of genocide in Gaza in a preliminary finding in January in a case brought against Israel by South Africa.

As such, all of Israel’s Western allies, who are signatories of the Genocide Convention and provide military and political support to Tel Aviv, are obligated to help stop the violence in Gaza. While there has been little action on this since January, public support from Western leaders—except for U.S. officials—has been notably quiet. They are likely aware that they could face prosecution by the ICC alongside Netanyahu and Gallant.

There is hope that this international diplomatic isolation is accompanied by behind-the-scenes pressure on Israeli leaders to stop the violence. Besides legal challenges, Israeli officials also face strong opposition from Palestinian solidarity activists. These activists have been so effective that influential figures within the U.S. national security community are concerned about the potential backlash disrupting Western strategies. These activists will continue their efforts as long as the violence in Gaza persists. As Becker concludes:

The unprecedented level of destruction in such a short amount of time in Gaza underscores the genocidal nature of Israel’s actions. It is becoming too difficult for the world to look away from mass graves, decimated hospitals, children under rubble, and filmed summary executions. This is not war. This is genocide.”

Feature photo | A Palestinian woman prays at a cemetery on the grave of a relative during the first day of Eid al-Fitr, the Muslim holiday that begins at the conclusion of the holy fasting month of Ramadan, in Deir Al-Balah, in the central Gaza Strip, on April 10, 2024, Majdi Fathi | AP

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... e-in-gaza/

New Film Gives a Harrowing Glimpse of Gaza’s Endless Night
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 21, 2024
Asa Winstanley

Image
A Palestinian girl stares into the cameraA survivor of an Israeli bombing in Gaza, who lost her mother and brothers.

The head of Amnesty International says that Israel’s unprecedented violence in Gaza has proven international law to be “frankly useless.”

“We are really as close to the abyss as we have ever been,” Amnesty’s secretary general Agnès Callamard told Al Jazeera.

Callamard’s comments feature in a new film titled The Night Won’t End, an uncompromising examination of Israeli war crimes during the genocide in Gaza.

The new documentary is part of the Qatar-based channel’s Fault Lines series.

The film examines the genocide through the lens of four Palestinian families in Gaza and the massacres Israel has carried out against them. You can watch the full film in the video embedded below.

One of the families is that of Hind Rajab, the 6-year-old Palestinian girl murdered by Israeli troops in January while she was on the phone to the Palestine Red Crescent Society desperately calling for help.

Trapped in a car surrounded by the bodies of her dead family, Hind was the sole survivor of an Israeli massacre. The family were fleeing their Gaza City home.



The film includes harrowing audio of that phone call as well as interviews with Hind’s mother and Red Crescent workers as it details the doomed efforts to save the girl while she was pinned down in the car.

After detailed coordination with Israeli occupation authorities, they sent paramedics to evacuate the surviving girl. Despite traveling along the exact route dictated by the Israeli military, the two paramedics were instantly shot dead by the Israeli soldiers when they arrived on the scene.

The bodies of Yousif Zeino and Ahmad al-Madhoun were only found two weeks later, along with the bodies of Hind and her six relatives.

Hind’s mother Wissam Hamada says in the film that she never had any faith in international law in the first place.

“I never felt that international laws or international organizations ever did anything for Gaza,” Hamada says. “It’s just ink on paper. They didn’t protect paramedics, journalists, children or civilians. Hind, Layan, my uncle, his wife and children were executed in cold blood.”

Hind’s killing caused outrage around the world.

What happened to Hind Rajab, the 6-year-old girl in Gaza trapped in a car surrounded by her dead relatives?

Through satellite imagery and in-depth analysis, we shed new light on Hind’s terrifying ordeal and how she was killed along with the medics sent to save her. pic.twitter.com/CZoD3XoPrO

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) February 22, 2024


In April student activists at Columbia University in New York renamed the building they occupied on campus “Hind’s Hall.” The hip-hop artist Macklemore later released a song of the same name.

Speaking to Al Jazeera, Nisreen Qawas from the Palestine Red Crescent Society headquarters in Ramallah also relives the trauma of that day.

“What makes it more difficult for me: Is it only Hind?” she says. “Is there another one thousand [of] Hind’s story? Ten thousand Hind’s stories? That did not have a name and a story on the TV, on the news, was not spread?”

“They have opened the door to hell”

Israel’s genocidal war against the population of the Gaza Strip has so far killed more than 37,000 people since 7 October 2023 – a number thought to be a significant underestimate due to the large number of bodies that remain trapped under the rubble.

According to the film, by the end of 2023, “more journalists and aid workers had been killed in Gaza than in any other conflict of the last few decades.”

“The Night Won’t End,” a new @AJFaultLines documentary, shows the impact of Israel’s war on Gaza through the pain and loss of three families. Director @kavichek and correspondent @sharifkouddous say the film documents how it has become “nearly impossible to stay alive in Gaza.” pic.twitter.com/NNiPQ2gIXw

— Democracy Now! (@democracynow) June 21, 2024


Amnesty’s Callamard has given similar warnings about the dire state of international law before.

In April she told Democracy Now! that “the international system is on the brink of collapse” due to the refusal by the US and others to hold Israel accountable for its crimes.

In The Night Won’t End, Al Jazeera journalist Sharif Abdel Kouddous also says that Israel’s assault on Gaza has “upended the system of international laws” created since 1945.

“The rules that were supposed to bind us together to prevent the worst from happening … those rules are no longer applicable,” Amnesty’s Callamard says. “Everything we created after World War II: that’s up for rewriting. And trust me it will not just be the United States and their allies who are gonna do that. They have opened the door to hell.”

Executive producer and co-writer of the film Laila al-Arian will speak to The Electronic Intifada livestream on Wednesday next week.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... ess-night/

******

Hezbollah can make Israel ‘uninhabitable in 72 hours,’ expert warns

Hezbollah possesses over 100,000 rockets and missiles that can devastate Israel's electricity and other infrastructure should Israel decide to invade Lebanon

News Desk

JUN 21, 2024

Image
Israel's Hadera power station (Photo credit: Shutterstock)

Israel’s power grid is vulnerable to a Hezbollah attack that could render it “uninhabitable” 72 hours later, Haaretz reported on 21 June.

According to the CEO of a company that manages and oversees Israel’s electrical systems on behalf of the government, Israel is entirely unprepared for a war with Hezbollah that would likely target the country’s power infrastructure.

“We are not ready for a real war. We live in a fantasy world, in my eyes,” said Shaul Goldstein, head of Noga – the Israel Independent System Operator.

Goldstein made the comments while speaking at a conference organized by The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) in the southern city of Sderot. He said that Israel would be “uninhabitable” after 72 hours without power. “You look at all of our infrastructure, the optical fibers, the ports – and I won’t go into the sensitive things – we are not in a good place.”

“If Nasrallah decides to paralyze Israel’s power grid, he only needs to pick up the phone and call the head of Beirut’s power grid, which is [technically] identical to Israel’s.” Goldstein added, “the upside is that we have invested a lot in protection, working together with Israel Electric Company.”

On Thursday, Reuters noted that Hezbollah likely possesses upwards of 150,000 missiles and rockets of various types and ranges.

Hezbollah says it has rockets that can hit all areas of Israel, including precision missiles, drones, and anti-tank, anti-aircraft and anti-ship missiles.

Israel and Hezbollah have been exchanging increasingly hostile threats in recent days. Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah warned an invasion of the Galilee is “still on the table” in the event of war.

Israeli-born Amos Hochstein, adviser to US President Joe Biden, traveled to Israel and Lebanon this week amid the heightened tensions.

In Israel, Hochstein met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Isaac Herzog, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, Knesset opposition leader Yair Lapid, and former war cabinet member Benny Gantz.

Haaretz writes that Hochstein warned of the possibility that war with Hezbollah could lead to a wide-scale Iranian attack on Israel, of a kind that would be difficult for Israel’s defense systems to repel in concert with possible wide-scale fire by Hezbollah from Lebanon.

Israeli leaders have for months threatened to “copy-paste” the destruction of Gaza onto Lebanon if Hezbollah did not halt its attacks from the north, which forced the evacuation of some 200,000 settlers.

On Wednesday, the Israeli army announced its Northern Command had approved operational plans for war with Lebanon.

Hezbollah-affiliated Lebanese MP and spokesman Ibrahim Moussawi stated earlier this week that if Israel wants a full-scale war, the Islamic resistance is ready.

“If they want to come to Lebanon, they are welcome. We are waiting for them. Ahlan wa Sahlan, as they say in Arabic,” he stated.

Moussawi noted that Israel is having difficulty managing the war in Gaza and asked where Israel would get the troops to launch a much more difficult invasion of Lebanon.

“They can’t manage themselves in Gaza, and they want to come here? In Gaza, they are not fighting. They are just bombarding and sending drones. But if they do come, we are anxiously waiting for them. We have made preparations that they can never imagine,” he added.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hezbollah ... pert-warns

New legal powers for Jewish settlers open door to 'actual annexation' of West Bank

The Israeli military has given religious settler and minister Bezalel Smotrich increased legal control over the occupied West Bank

News Desk

JUN 21, 2024

Image
A view of the Israeli West Bank settlement of Ariel, January 28, 2020. (Photo credit: AP Photo/Ariel Schalit)

The Israeli military has quietly handed over significant legal powers in the occupied West Bank to pro-settler civil servants working for Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, the Guardian reported on 21 June, in a move that will help accelerate Israel’s illegal annexation of the occupied Palestinian territories.

The Israeli military announced the transfer of responsibility for dozens of bylaws at the Civil Administration on its website on 29 May. The Civil Administration governs the West Bank under the military's direction.

Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer, said: “The bottom line is that [for] anyone who thought the question of annexation was foggy, this order should end any doubts. What this order does is transfers vast areas of administrative power from the military commander to Israeli civilians working for the government.”

The transfer will allow Smotrich and his civilian appointees from his religious settler movement to further remove domestic legal obstacles to the theft of Palestinian land for Jewish settlement in the West Bank.

It will also allow Smotrich to further limit Palestinians from building new homes on their own land, which are needed as their population grows.

Israel captured the West Bank and militarily occupied it in 1967. It is home to millions of indigenous Palestinian Christians and Muslims.

Acquiring territory through war and establishing foreign settlements therein is illegal under international law.

The Guardian notes that Israeli politicians have long sought to​ find ways to annex the occupied Palestinian West Bank and make it formally part of Israel.

The transfer of laws, which received little attention in the Israeli press, follows a years-long campaign by pro-settlement politicians to acquire legal powers in the West Bank previously held by the Israeli military as the occupying power.

The laws cover everything from building regulations to the administration of agriculture, forestry, parks, and bathing locations.

Mairav Zonszein, a senior analyst for Israel–Palestine at Crisis Group, said, “The big story is that this is no longer ‘creeping annexation’ or ‘de facto annexation,’ it is actual annexation.”

“This is the legalization [and] normalization of a long-term policy. Smotrich is basically re-establishing the way in which the occupation works by taking a large part out of the hands of the military,” Zonszein added.

Smotrich, a leader in the religious settler movement, became finance minister and a minister in the defense ministry as part of a coalition agreement that brought Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu back to power in late 2022.

He quickly began calling for the annexation of the West Bank, as well as ethnically cleansing Palestinians from it to clear the way for additional Jewish settlement.

Smotrich has called for the destruction of Gaza, the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the strip, and its annexation as well.

https://thecradle.co/articles/new-legal ... -west-bank

Washington doubtful Israel’s Iron Dome can keep up in war against Lebanon
Hezbollah has already managed to target numerous Iron Dome platforms throughout the course of the war

News Desk

JUN 21, 2024

Image
An Iron Dome platform destroyed by Hezbollah earlier this month. (Photo credit: X)

Officials in Washington are raising serious concerns that Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system could fail in the event of a wider war with Hezbollah, three sources told CNN on 20 June.

The anonymous officials said these fears have also been communicated to Washington by Tel Aviv, which has recently indicated to its ally that it is planning to expand its already violent and indiscriminate assault on south Lebanon.

Israel is “planning to shift resources from southern Gaza to northern Israel in preparation for a possible offensive against the group,” the US officials said.

“We assess that at least some [Iron Dome batteries] will be overwhelmed,” one senior official told CNN.

Another official said: “In the event of a full-blown war, the support Israel will need most is additional air defense systems and Iron Dome replenishments, which the US would provide.”

Over the past few months, Hezbollah has increasingly carried out operations targeting Israeli Iron Dome platforms across the Galilee. Hezbollah released footage of an operation targeting Iron Dome batteries earlier this month, with images of the destroyed platform circulating in Hebrew media afterward.

The resistance group released a video on the morning of 21 June showcasing its recent attack on the Drone Dome radar system, which detects incoming UAV infiltrations.

It came just a few days after Hezbollah released a nine-minute video of footage filmed by its surveillance drones.

The footage showed several sensitive sites in the north including the port of Haifa, the military sites and warships within the port, and buildings belonging to the Israeli Rafael defense technology firm north of Haifa, where air defense missiles for the Iron Dome and David’s Sling systems are manufactured, assembled, and stored. The video caused panic across Israel.

In April, Iran launched hundreds of drones and missiles at Israel in response to the attack on its consulate earlier that month. The attack, while limited, still managed to penetrate and overwhelm Tel Aviv’s defense systems.

Palestinian resistance groups have also been able to overwhelm the Iron Dome throughout the course of the war.

However, Hezbollah's vast arsenal of missiles, rockets, and precision-guided weapons poses an even greater threat to the system.

“Israeli officials have told the US they believe the Iron Dome could be vulnerable, particularly in northern Israel, and have been surprised at the sophistication of Hezbollah’s strikes to date,” the US officials went on to tell CNN.

One Israeli official cited by the outlet confirmed that Hezbollah attacks could be “challenging for the system to defend against.”

Meanwhile, concerns are also growing over Hezbollah’s network of tunnels under Lebanon – which have been described as even more sophisticated than the vast tunnel network used by Hamas and other resistance groups in Gaza.

“Unlike Gaza, which is geographically isolated from its backers in Tehran, Iran has established ground and air supply routes leading to Lebanon through Iraq and Syria that could be used to sustain Hezbollah’s forces in the event of an all-out war,” said Amy Mackinnon, Foreign Policy magazine’s intelligence and national security correspondent.

https://thecradle.co/articles/washingto ... st-lebanon
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Jun 23, 2024 12:00 pm

Image
Source: Palestine Chronicle

Unconditional Support – The United States Is the Main Obstacle to Peace in Palestine
Originally published: Palestine Chronicle on June 17, 2024 by Medea Benjamin & Nicolas J.S. Davies (more by Palestine Chronicle) | (Posted Jun 22, 2024)

On June 13, Hamas responded to persistent needling by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken over the US proposal for a pause in the Israeli massacre in Gaza. The group said it has “dealt positively… with the latest proposal and all proposals to reach a ceasefire agreement.” Hamas added, by contrast, that, “while Blinken continues to talk about ‘Israel’s approval of the latest proposal, we have not heard any Israeli official voicing approval.”

The full details of the US proposal have yet to be made public, but the pause in Israeli attacks and release of hostages in the first phase would reportedly lead to further negotiations for a more lasting ceasefire and the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in the second phase. But there is no guarantee that the second round of negotiations would succeed.

As former Israeli Labor Party prime minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio on June 3, “How do you think (Gaza military commander) Sinwar will react when he is told: but be quick, because we still have to kill you, after you return all the hostages?”

Meanwhile, as Hamas pointed out, Israel has not publicly accepted the terms of the latest US ceasefire proposal, so it has only the word of US officials that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has privately agreed to it. In public, Netanyahu still insists that he is committed to the complete destruction of Hamas and its governing authority in Gaza, and has actually stepped up Israel’s vicious attacks in central and southern Gaza.

The basic disagreement that President Joe Biden and Secretary Blinken’s smoke and mirrors cannot hide is that Hamas, like every Palestinian, wants a real end to the genocide, while the Israeli and US governments do not.

Biden or Netanyahu could end the slaughter very quickly if they wanted to—Netanyahu by agreeing to a permanent ceasefire, or Biden by ending or suspending US weapons deliveries to Israel.

Israel could not carry out this war without US military and diplomatic support. But Biden refuses to use his leverage, even though he has admitted in an interview that it was “reasonable” to conclude that Netanyahu is prolonging the war for his own political benefit.

The US is still sending weapons to Israel to continue the massacre in violation of a ceasefire order by the International Court of Justice. Bipartisan US leaders have invited Netanyahu to address a joint session of the US Congress on July 24, even as the International Criminal Court reviews a request by its chief prosecutor for an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for war crimes, crimes against humanity and murder.

The United States seems determined to share Israel’s self-inflicted isolation from voices calling for peace from all over the world, including large majorities of countries in the UN General Assembly and Security Council.

But perhaps this is appropriate, as the United States bears a great deal of responsibility for that isolation. By its decades of unconditional support for Israel, and by using its UN Security Council veto dozens of times to shield Israel from international accountability, the United States has enabled successive Israeli governments to pursue flagrantly criminal policies and to thumb their noses at the growing outrage of people and countries across the world.

This pattern of US support for Israel goes all the way back to its founding, when Zionist leaders in Palestine unleashed a well-planned operation to seize much more territory than the UN allocated to their new state in its partition plan, which the Palestinians and neighboring countries already firmly opposed.

The massacres, the bulldozed villages and the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 to a million people in the Nakba have been meticulously documented, despite an extraordinary propaganda campaign to persuade two generations of Israelis, Americans and Europeans that they never happened.

The US was the first country to grant Israel de facto recognition on May 14, 1948, and played a leading role in the 1949 UN votes to recognize the new state of Israel within its illegally seized borders. President Eisenhower had the wisdom to oppose Britain, France and Israel in their war to capture the Suez Canal in 1956, but Israel’s seizure of the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 1967 persuaded U.S. leaders that it could be a valuable military ally in the Middle East.

Unconditional US support for Israel’s illegal occupation and annexation of more and more territory over the past 57 years has corrupted Israeli politics and encouraged increasingly extreme and racist Israeli governments to keep expanding their genocidal territorial ambitions. Netanyahu’s Likud party and government now fully embrace their Greater Israel plan to annex all of occupied Palestine and parts of other countries, wherever and whenever new opportunities for expansion present themselves.

Israel’s de facto expansion has been facilitated by the United States monopoly over mediation between Israel and Palestine, which it has aggressively staked out and defended against the UN and other countries. The irreconcilable contradiction between the US’ conflicting roles as Israel’s most powerful military ally and the principal mediator between Israel and Palestine is obvious to the whole world.

But as we see even in the midst of the genocide in Gaza, the rest of the world and the UN have failed to break this US monopoly and establish legitimate, impartial mediation by the UN or neutral countries that respect the lives of Palestinians and their human and civil rights.

Qatar mediated a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in November 2023, but it has since been upstaged by US moves to prolong the massacre through deceptive proposals, cynical posturing and Security Council vetoes. The US consistently vetoes all but its own proposals on Israel and Palestine in the UN Security Council, even when its own proposals are deliberately meaningless, ineffective or counterproductive.

The UN General Assembly is united in support of Palestine, voting almost unanimously year after year to demand an end to the Israeli occupation.

A hundred and forty-four countries have recognized Palestine as a country, and only the US veto denies it full UN membership. The Israeli genocide in Gaza has even shamed the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) into suspending their ingrained pro-Western bias and pursuing cases against Israel.

One way that the nations of the world could come together to apply greater pressure on Israel to end its assault on Gaza would be a “Uniting for Peace” resolution in the UN General Assembly. This is a measure the General Assembly can take when the Security Council is prevented from acting to restore peace and security by the veto of a permanent member.

Israel has demonstrated that it is prepared to ignore ceasefire resolutions by the General Assembly and the Security Council, and an order by the ICJ, but a Uniting for Peace resolution could impose penalties on Israel for its actions, such as an arms embargo or an economic boycott. If the United States still insists on continuing its complicity in Israel’s international crimes, the General Assembly could take action against the US too.

A General Assembly resolution would change the terms of the international debate and shift the focus back from Biden and Blinken’s diversionary tactics to the urgency of enforcing the lasting ceasefire that the whole world is calling for.

It is time for the United Nations and neutral countries to push Israel’s US partner in genocide to the side, and for legitimate international authorities and mediators to take responsibility for enforcing international law, ending the Israeli occupation of Palestine and bringing peace to the Middle East.

https://mronline.org/2024/06/22/uncondi ... palestine/

******

Israeli war criminals: can the ICC lock them up?

The ICC’s bold pursuit of arrest warrants for western-allied Israeli leaders could redefine international justice. Even if Netanyahu and Co aren’t tossed behind bars, ‘their world will suddenly become a lot smaller.’


Stasa Salacanin

JUN 21, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor’s announcement on 20 May of arrest warrants for five Israeli and Hamas leaders immediately triggered a torrent of comments and opinions worldwide.

The legal initiative represents an unprecedented milestone in international relations, marking the first time leaders of a western-allied state have been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

According to ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan, there are reasonable arguments that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant are criminally responsible for starvation, murder, intentional attacks against civilians, extermination, and persecution, among other crimes. As Khan explained it:

[These crimes] were committed as part of a widespread and systematic attack against the Palestinian civilian population pursuant to state policy. These crimes, in our assessment, continue to this day.

Khan has also requested arrest warrants for Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’ leader in Gaza, Mohammed Deif, leader of Hamas’ military wing, and Ismail Haniyeh, the group’s political leader.

Main effects of ICC sanctions

The ICC, established in 2002 as the permanent court of last resort to prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and the crime of aggression, comprises 124 state parties. However, the court relies on its member states’ cooperation for enforcement, a collaboration not forthcoming from influential states such as the US, Russia, China, and Israel that do not recognize the court’s jurisdiction.

Issuing arrest warrants for top Israeli leaders is, therefore, likely to involve an unprecedented degree of political and logistical complexity – with many obstacles erected by Tel Aviv’s western allies.

Speaking to The Cradle, Boston University School of Law’s International Human Rights Clinic Director Susan Akram points out that the ICC prosecutor must first address numerous legal questions to provide supporting evidence to the pre-trial judges. The timeline for their deliberations and decisions on the warrant requests remain uncertain.

Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch and visiting professor at Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs, highlights the main effect of the ICC arrest warrants, should they be issued as requested. Netanyahu and Gallant would be unable to travel to any of the 124 ICC member states, as they risk arrest and surrender to The Hague for trial.

“Their world will suddenly become a lot smaller,” he tells The Cradle, adding that he hopes “governments think twice about sending them more arms, given that they will have been formally accused of using them to commit war crimes and will presumably try to avoid answering these charges in court.”

Gentian Zyberi, professor of international law and human rights at the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, University of Oslo, notes that the ICC could impose other sanctions, such as seizing funds and property abroad to use as reparations to victims.

“The most important political consequence would be to their legitimacy as political leaders once the ICC confirms the charges,” he warns.

Realistically, though, some states may refuse to surrender Netanyahu, citing his status as head of government and thus immunity while in their territory, argues Professor John Quigley from Ohio State University. Though the ICC does not honor this immunity itself, international law has not conclusively resolved the matter. He adds:

As for a penalty, there would be no question of any penalty before a conviction. The typical penalty is imprisonment. A fine can also be imposed. If the person had assets in a state party to the Rome Statute, it could be asked by the ICC to seize them.

ICC under threat from the US and Israel

The potential issuance of these warrants has prompted mixed reactions globally. While several EU states, including France, Belgium, Slovenia, Ireland, and Spain, have responded positively, the US and Israel have predictably responded furiously.

US President Joe Biden, for example, expressed outrage over the court jointly seeking warrants for both Israel and Hamas leaders that accuse them of similar crimes: “Whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas.” Biden also denied outright the existence of a genocide in Gaza: “What’s happening is not genocide. We reject that,” he said during a speech at the White House.

In turn, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said the court has no jurisdiction over Israel’s action into question the “legitimacy and credibility of this investigation.” But the ICC pre-trial chamber has already rejected that argument, based on the UN General Assembly’s overwhelming vote granting Palestine the status of a “non-member observer state.

Washington further claims that the ICC prosecutor should have deferred to Israeli self-investigations under what is known as the principle of complementarity. But Roth fully debunks the notion that Israel is capable of investigating itself objectively over war crimes: “Israel has announced 70 investigations but none into the starvation strategy that is at the heart of the ICC’s current case.”

Moreover, Roth points out that “Israel has no history of prosecuting senior officials for war crimes” and is unlikely to do so anytime soon, based on Netanyahu’s contemptuous response to the ICC request in which he labeled Khan an “antisemite.”

Sanctioning justice

In the meantime, the US House of Representatives passed legislation to sanction the court for seeking arrest warrants for senior Israeli leaders, which now awaits its approval in the US Senate. The legislation seeks to sanction individuals who have “directly engaged in or otherwise aided” the ICC in prosecuting Americans or citizens of US allies that do not recognize the ICC, including Israel.

Washington’s primary interest in restricting the ICC’s reach is concern that the court might turn its attention and legal clout toward American troops and officials engaged in unlawful military aggressions and operations across the globe.

This is not the first time Washington and Tel Aviv have threatened the ICC and the Special Prosecutor’s Office. Professor Akram recalls that former President Donald Trump issued an executive order freezing the US accounts of former special prosecutor Fatou Bensouda and her staff members and denying them visas to enter the US to report to United Nations HQ in New York.

A recent investigative report in the Guardian has revealed that Israel ran a campaign of harassment and threats against Bensouda and her family for 10 years, in which its intelligence agencies were deployed “to surveil, hack, pressure, smear and allegedly threaten senior ICC staff in an effort to derail the court’s inquiries.”

But, as Zyberi argues, sanctioning the ICC or its staff for investigating the Palestine situation violates the ICC Statute, interfering with justice administration, and thus – itself – warrants sanctions under Article 70.

Quigley contends that Washington’s reaction signals a disregard for the rule of law: it supports the ICC against adversaries but denounces it when allies are targeted. This duality was underscored by Prosecutor Khan in an interview with CNN when he revealed an astonishing admission by a senior leader: “This court [the ICC] is built for Africa and for thugs like Putin.”

For Akram, the ICC’s past focus on African and Balkan perpetrators effectively ignores the crimes of western powers, for example, by the US and the UK in Iraq and Afghanistan. The case against Netanyahu and Gallant, she believes, tests the court’s credibility today - while Roth sees the potential warrants as proof that even powerful leaders can be held accountable under the law.

If the process Khan initiated is seen through to fruition, the ICC will be uniquely positioned to reshape the boundaries of international justice and hold war criminals – irrespective of nationality, race, or religion – accountable. That moves us one step closer to international law and another step away from the western-led era of impunity.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-w ... ck-them-up

Palestinians released from Israeli torture camps detail ‘nightmare’ conditions
Badr Dahlan, a released Palestinian captive from Khan Yunis, showed signs of severe psychological distress after his brutal torture by Israeli forces

News Desk

JUN 21, 2024

Image
Palestinians held captive in a courtyard in a prison in southern Israel, February 14, 2024. (Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

The Israeli army released 33 Palestinian abductees taken captive from Gaza in previous months, Anadolu Agency reported on 21 June, amid continued reports that Israel is subjecting the detainees to severe torture.

“The freed Palestinians were admitted to the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital with thin bodies and signs of torture,” said Palestinian medical sources speaking with Anadolu.

The sources added that the detainees were set free in eastern Deir al-Balah in central Gaza.

Since the beginning of the Israeli ground invasion in Gaza, Israel has abducted thousands of Palestinian civilians, including women, children, and medical and rescue workers.

Israel has released some, while others remain in Israeli captivity.

One of those released on Thursday was Badr Dahlan, 30, who displayed signs of psychological distress, including bugged eyes and difficulty forming sentences while speaking.


He said that the month he spent in Israeli captivity was a “nightmare” where he endured “harsh conditions” and “violations and acts of torture,” including severe beatings and electric shocks.

“They [Israeli army] beat my hands and legs,” Dahlan said. “They were going to cut off my leg.”

He said he did not know the fate of his family or where he would live, as his home city of Khan Yunis was largely destroyed by Israeli forces.

After being transferred to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza to be treated after his release, Dahlan said he “feels like he is going to die.”

Since the start of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, many reports of extreme torture have emerged from the detention facility at Sde Teiman military base.

On 6 June, the New York Times reported accounts of Israel using electric chairs to shock prisoners, sleep deprivation, and electric rods to sodomize them.

The report said 35 of the 4,000 Palestinians passing through the Sde Teiman detention camp died, including one who was sodomized.

On 19 June, Dr Muneer Al Barsh, Director General of the Ministry of Health in Gaza, said that the torture techniques reported by Palestinian detainees, including electric shocks, suspension, stretching, and nail pulling. He said multiple detainees reported that Israel used trained dogs to perform “vile acts” on detainees.

On 18 June, Haaretz reported that a senior doctor from Gaza was tortured to death in November while under interrogation by the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security service.

Dr Iyad Rantisi, 53, directed a women’s hospital that is part of Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahia, in the northern Gaza Strip.

https://thecradle.co/articles/palestini ... conditions

US vows 'security support' for Israel in all-out war with Lebanon

White House officials assured their Israeli counterparts of US weapons, but did not commit to sending US troops to fight

News Desk

JUN 22, 2024

Image
US and Israeli offiicals in Tel Aviv in October, 2023. (Photo Credit: Avi Ohayon/GPO.)

Senior US officials confirmed that if Israel wages a full out war against Hezbollah in Lebanon, Washington is fully prepared to back its ally in Tel Aviv, CNN reported on 22 June.

According to a senior administration official speaking with CNN, the US officials gave the assurances in person to a delegation of Israeli security officials visiting Washington this week.

The Israeli officials, including Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer and national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi, met with US officials, including national security adviser Jake Sullivan, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and White House Middle East affairs coordinator Brett McGurk.

The face-to-face assurances come amid heightened tensions between Israel and the Lebanese resistance group. In recent weeks, Hezbollah has escalated its attacks on Israel’s military infrastructure near the Lebanese border.

At the same time, Israeli officials have issued multiple threats claiming they will launch a major attack on Lebanon, including attacking civilian areas such as in the capital, Beirut.

Israeli officials are frustrated that they are not able to provide security for some 100,000 displaced Israelis to return to settlements in the north.

When discussing the prospects of a major war, US officials said they would offer Israel the security assistance it needs but would not deploy US troops to the ground.

If Hezbollah were to significantly expand the scale of its attacks on Israel, resulting in the deaths of Israelis, US officials expect Israel to respond with full force, CNN added.

Earlier this week, US officials warned that in the event of an all-out war, Hezbollah would be able to overwhelm the Iron Dome with its powerful arsenal of over 100,000 missiles and rockets.

“Israeli officials have told the US they believe the Iron Dome could be vulnerable, particularly in northern Israel, and have been surprised at the sophistication of Hezbollah’s strikes to date,” the US officials went on to tell CNN.

One Israeli official cited by the outlet confirmed that Hezbollah attacks could be “challenging for the system to defend against.”

It is also unclear whether Israel will have the troops to launch a full-scale war with ground troops. Israel faces a serious enlistment crisis and shortage of soldiers in the Israeli army and has lost many troops to death and injury fighting Hamas in Gaza.

On 21 June, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant asked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to schedule an urgent meeting to discuss extending compulsory military service to three years.

“The new security reality requires finding means to continue the war effort,” Gallant was quoted as saying. Gallant has requested that Netanyahu approve this in government within the coming days.

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-vows-s ... th-lebanon

Yemen, Iraqi resistance strike ships at Haifa port in second joint operation

The operations targeted five ships in and en route to Israel’s port of Haifa

News Desk

JUN 23, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

Yemen’s Armed Forces announced early on 23 June that it targeted five ships in two joint operations with the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI) coalition.

“The Yemeni Armed Forces, in cooperation with the Iraqi Islamic Resistance, carried out two joint military operations, which were as follows: The first operation targeted four ships in the port of Haifa, including two cement tanker ships, and the other two were general cargo ships belonging to companies that violated the decision to ban entry to the ports of occupied Palestine with a number of drones,” Yemeni army spokesman Yahya Saree said in a statement.

“The other operation targeted the Shorthorn Express ship in the Mediterranean Sea on its way to the port of Haifa, using a number of drones. Both operations achieved their goals successfully, and the injuries were accurate and direct,” the statement added.

The statement came hours after Sanaa’s forces announced operations against the ‘Transworld Navigator ship’ in the Arabian Sea, as well as the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier – which Yemen has struck several times over the past month.

Washington has reportedly ordered the USS Eisenhower to pull out of the region for the second time since April.

The announcement also followed the Yemeni army’s release of footage on 22 June unveiling the new Toofan-1 drone boat, a locally made uncrewed surface vessel armed with 150 kilograms of explosives.


The targeting of the five ships announced early Sunday marks the second joint operation carried out by the Armed Forces of Yemen’s Sanaa government and the IRI.

“The Yemeni Armed Forces carried out two joint military operations with the Islamic Resistance of Iraq … The first targeted two ships that were carrying military equipment in the port of Haifa, and the second targeted a ship that violated our decision to ban entry into the port of Haifa in occupied Palestine,” Saree said on 6 June.

Last month, the leader of Yemen’s Ansarallah movement, Abdul Malik al-Houthi, held a phone call with the chief of Iraq’s Kataib Hezbollah, Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi, during which the two resistance leaders discussed coordinating efforts to confront Israel.

https://thecradle.co/articles/yemen-ira ... -operation

Dozens killed in northern Gaza during Israeli assassination attempt

Israeli attacks across Gaza over the past 24 hours have killed over 100 Palestinians, marking the highest death toll since a joint Israel-US rescue operation in Nuseirat refugee camp killed nearly 300

News Desk

JUN 22, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Ayman Al Hassi/Reuters)

At least 42 Palestinians were killed on 22 June by Israeli attacks on four different neighborhoods in Gaza City.

The Government Media Office in the strip said that since the morning, the Israeli military targeted Al-Shati refugee camp, Al-Tuffah neighborhood, Shujaiya, and Al-Zaytoun.

The army destroyed an entire residential block in Al-Shati camp in what Hebrew media described as an assassination attempt on a senior commander of Hamas' Qassam Brigades, Raad Saad.

Gaza civil defense spokesman Mahmoud Basal told Al Jazeera that reaching victims in Al-Shati refugee camp has been “very difficult,” stressing that “the ability of the civil defense is limited compared with the scale of destruction.”

The Government Media Office also reported that at least 38 bodies reached Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital, along with 50 injuries, many of them critical.

Basal also said that the number of civilians missing beneath the rubble of residential buildings bombed by Israeli jets remains unknown.

“Israel continues its brutal targeting of defenseless civilians in Gaza and carried out new massacres in Al-Shati refugee camp, Al-Mawasi, and Rafah,” Hamas said in a statement following the attacks.
“These crimes require more effective action from the international community to force the occupation to stop its crimes and violations,” the statement adds.

Al-Shati camp was one of the few places in the north where the Israeli military told Palestinians, particularly from Jabalia refugee camp and Beit Lahia, to seek refuge.

Israeli attacks in Gaza have killed 101 Palestinians and wounded 169 over the last 24 hours, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health. This marks the highest daily death toll recorded in the enclave since 8 June, when Israeli forces killed at least 274 Palestinians during a joint operation with the US army in the Nuseirat refugee camp.

https://thecradle.co/articles/dozens-ki ... on-attempt
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Jun 24, 2024 11:28 am

Battles Intensify Between Palestinian Resistance Fighters, Israeli Forces in Rafah
JUNE 22, 2024

Image
Palestinians run during Israeli bombardment in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on June 19, 2024. Photo: AFP.

XTelegramRedditWhatsAppLinkedInFacebookThreadsMessengerWeChatMastodonEmailPrintCopy LinkShare
Battles have intensified between Palestinian resistance fighters and Israeli forces in Rafah as the regime’s tanks push into the southern Gaza Strip city.

Media reports said on Thursday that the fighting is taking place in western and central Rafah, Gaza’s last refuge.

The reports added that some of the heaviest clashes are underway at the outskirts of al-Shaboura refugee camp.

Israel unleashed a genocidal war on Gaza on October 7, which has so far killed at least 37,396 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and injured 85,523 others.

Seven months later, the occupying regime began a ground offensive in Rafah, home to displaced Palestinians who had fled from the rest of Gaza amid the bloody Israeli onslaught.



On Wednesday, eight Palestinians were killed in Rafah’s al-Mawasi area and many families fled north in panic after Israeli tanks, backed by warplanes and drones, advanced deeper into the city.

Israeli troops blew up several homes in western Rafah, residents said, adding that heavy shelling and gunfire hit the tents of displaced families in al-Mawasi.

“Another night of horror in Rafah. They (the Israeli forces) opened fire from planes, drones and tanks on the western areas to cover for their invasion,” a Rafah resident told Reuters.

“Bullets and shells landed in the al-Mawasi area near where people slept, killing and wounding many.”

Meanwhile, medics said an Israeli air raid killed four Palestinians, including a child, at a house in the Gaza City suburb of Sheikh Radwan.

The armed wings of Hamas and Islamic Jihad resistance groups said their fighters had battled the occupation forces with anti-tank rockets and mortar bombs, and have in some areas detonated pre-planted explosive devices against them.

https://orinocotribune.com/battles-inte ... -in-rafah/

******

Hezbollah shows off Israeli target bank in new video warning

A retired Israeli general said over the weekend that declaring war on Lebanon would be ‘mass suicide’ for Israel

News Desk

JUN 23, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Rouzbeh Fouladi/ZUMA)

Hezbollah released a video titled “To whom it may concern” on 22 June, featuring coordinates of sensitive and vital Israeli targets that would be struck in the event of a war against Lebanon, marking the second such warning within less than a week.


The video begins with a clip from the latest speech by Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, where he warns that the Lebanese resistance will fight “without limits, rules, or restraints” if Israel wages a war against Lebanon.

It then proceeds to show numerous targets across Israel.

The targets include several sensitive targets in Haifa, the port of Ashdod, the Hadera power station, the Ramat David Military Airport in Afula, Pengrion Airport, Nevatim air base, oil refineries on the coast, and the Research Center at the Dimona Nuclear Reactor.

The clip also showed the HaKirya Complex, which includes the headquarters of the Israeli Ministry of Security and the General Staff.

Fears are growing in Israel as Tel Aviv has threatened that it is preparing an expanded attack on Lebanon.

On 22 June, retired Israeli general Yitzhak Brik said that declaring war on Lebanon would mean “mass suicide for Israel.”

The new clip came just a few days after Hezbollah released a nine-minute video of footage filmed by its drones, “…what the hoopoe came back with,” which show several sensitive sites in Israel’s north, namely the port of Haifa and the warships and military sites in its vicinity.


The video also showed buildings belonging to the Israeli Rafael defense technology firm north of Haifa, where air defense missiles for the Iron Dome and David’s Sling systems are manufactured, assembled, and stored.

“The Hezbollah video conveys an unequivocal message to Israel, that the party is present inside Israel by the air, land, and sea, and is planning what comes next, and that is capable of carrying out severe strikes,” Israel’s Channel 14 news outlet said last week, adding that the filming of this footage is “an Israeli security failure of the first degree … The situation in the north is much worse than we imagine.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/hezbollah ... eo-warning

******

“To Whom It May Concern”: Hezbollah Reaffirms Warnings, Reveals Targets in Israel
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 22, 2024

Image
Al ManarA screen grab from Hezbollah's videoA screen grab from Hezbollah’s video

Hezbollah’s military media released a powerful video titled “To Whom It May Concern,” reinforcing the group’s Secretary-General Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah’s recent warning to the Zionist entity. The video serves as a stark reminder of the consequences that await the entity if it engages in reckless actions against Lebanon.

The video includes coordinates of strategic sites within occupied Palestine, such as Ben Gurion Airport, Haifa, Hadera Port, Ashdod Port, and several other critical areas.

In addition, this release follows the 9-minute “Hoopoe” video, which revealed strategic Israeli military bases in northern Palestine and the Haifa area, captured by a drone.

Image
Coordinates of Vital Areas Revealed in the Video

This new message from Hezbollah underscores their detailed knowledge of those vital locations, signaling a dire threat to the Israeli entity.

🇱🇧⚡️ Hezbollah Military Media released a video clip showing vital Israeli targets. In the video: Ben Gurion Airport, Haifa, Hadera Port and Ashdod Port. pic.twitter.com/4AoyBThH0N

— ResistanceTrench (@Trenchmates) June 22, 2024


https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... in-israel/

Egypt, Jordan, UAE: Why Let a Genocide Get in the Way of Business?
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JUNE 23, 2024
Vanessa Beeley


Image
An Egyptian soldier at the Taba Crossing 430km north-east of Cairo.

Egyptian, UAE and Jordanian exports to Israel soar in 2024

A recent report published by the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics reveals foreign trade by country and demonstrates an increase in imports from the US by 28.5 %. No need to guess what those imports might include.

Egyptian exports to Israel doubled in 2024 compared to the previous year despite Egypt’s role as “peace” mediator between the Zionist genocidaires and the Palestinian Resistance factions in Gaza. While Israel has been conducting hourly massacres in Gaza, bombing entire swathes of essential infrastructure, decimating healthcare, water desalination plants, schools, refugee centres, UN agency buildings, internet grids and slaughtering children in the most barbaric and merciless ways – Egypt has been benefitting from an increase in trade with the genocidal, apartheid settler state of Israel.

The data published on Thursday showed that Egyptian exports in May 2024 stood at $25m, double that of the same period in 2023.

Energy and security cooperation between the two countries has intensified since October. This includes the export of what is effectively stolen Palestinian gas to Egypt which has also increased exponentially in the last 12 months.

All this has been quietly going on while Egypt appears to profess distaste at the Zionist savagery in Gaza, made possible with US-manufactured bombs and UK, Canadian and EU political advocacy for genocide. How much of this “humanitarian” posturing is to be trusted in the light of their economic adventurism with Israel?

From an article in Middle East Eye:

Israel’s trade with Egypt grew by 56 percent in 2023 and was up 168 percent year-on-year in the fourth quarter, according to the Abraham Accords Peace Institute report. In 2022, the two countries set a target for annual trade at around $700 million by 2025, up from about $300 million in 2021.

It is recognised, in the region, that Egypt was quite happy to maintain the closure of the Rafah crossing into Gaza on the pretext of preventing arms being sent to the Resistance forces (a measure that benefits Israel) while, in reality, preventing the delivery of essential humanitarian aid into the Gaza extermination camp.

Since October 7th, Jordan has provided the air-space for Israel to carry out unlawful attacks on Syria and provided air-defence during the Iranian retaliation for the Zionist bombing of the Iranian Consulate building in the Embassy compound in Damascus.

Jordanian exports to Israel also continued to rise in 2024, reaching $35.7m in May 2024 compared to $32.3m in the same period last year.

Concurrently the report details increased exports from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to Israel – $242m in May 2024, compared to $238.5m in May 2023. The UAE has also provided the land bridge for the Zionist entity to counter the Red Sea blockade enforced by Ansarullah in Yemen to pressure the US and Israel to end the genocide in Gaza and the Occupied Territories.

The race to normalise relations with the genocidal Zionist entity was always going to be the priority for the countries that depend upon good relations with Israel and the US for their economic development, debt relief and defence alliances. Egypt has led this normalisation alliance since 1979 and the Camp David Accords.

A recent article in Al Akhbar points out that normalisation with such an apartheid, oppressive, racist and genocidal entity is actually a violation of international law.

The aim is to consolidate and reformulate settlement colonialism by normalizing the system of power and domination that contradicts everything that is natural and ordinary. In this way, the peoples of the region are being conditioned to accept normal relations with Israel without a just solution to the Palestinian issue and to accept the occupation, apartheid and war crimes. […] It is not possible to normalize with systems that violate international law, human rights and existence.

Al Akhbar argues that normalisation with Israel involves collaboration in a crime that has been ongoing for more than 75 years, against the Palestinians. A crime that has included decades of ethnic cleansing, the prohibition of the right to return for indigenous people expelled from their homes and land, ongoing massacres, torture, abuse, apartheid, rape, illegal settlement, detention of Palestinians and occupation, the construction of an apartheid wall. All crimes that have been declared crimes under international law.

Normalisation with the Zionist entity deprives the Palestinian people of their legitimate rights under international law, rights that include above all, self determination. Normalisation has provided concessions for the Zionist entity by legitimising their crimes and effectively disappearing Palestinian rights in parallel. The countries responsible for normalistion with Israel must also bear responsibility for the reparations that must eventually be paid to the Palestinian people when justice is finally served.

Normalising relations or maintaining existing economic/trade relations with Israel while the apartheid state is committing a de facto genocide is abhorrent and unlawful – what concrete steps have these countries taken to prevent and punish genocide under the Genocide Convention? Yemen has clearly stated its intent to do just this, Egypt, UAE and Jordan have paid lip service to the Convention, little else.

MEE has interviewed Egyptian soldiers who have said “their country has failed Gaza”

We train day and night, and repeat marching chants against the Zionist enemy, and we hear dedicated newsletters bragging about how ready the military is, but when this enemy is killing thousands of our brothers, we sit idle.

In the coastal city of Alexandria Egyptian security forces arrested 250 Al Ahly football fans after they had been chanting pro-Palestine slogans during the match.

The fans were detained during their team’s match against Farco on Friday, according to the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms (ECRF) – Children aged 13 and 15 were among those detained.

The Sisi regime is renowned for strong-arm tactics to suppress dissent in Egypt since Sisi rose to power in 2013 but the genocide in Gaza and Egypt’s continued normalisation with the Zionist regime may just be enough to tip the popular scales against the regime.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/06/ ... -business/

******

Netanyahu rejects ‘Israeli proposal’ for Gaza ceasefire

Palestinians called the ceasefire proposal a ‘US–Israeli game’ to allow the ‘occupation to resume the aggression’ that has killed over 37,000 people

News Desk

JUN 24, 2024

Image
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to Channel 14 in the first interview he's given to an Israeli news outlet since October 7, on June 23, 2024. (PHoto credit: Screenshot, Channel 14, used in accordance with Clause 27a of the Copyright Law)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on 23 June said he rejects a US-backed ceasefire deal with Hamas that would end the war in Gaza and bring Israeli captives home.

In an interview with Israel’s Channel 14, Netanyahu was asked if he agreed to end the war as part of a deal to exchange captives and said he didn’t. “I will not stop the war and leave Hamas standing in Gaza,” he said.

Hamas holds some 120 Israeli soldiers and civilians captive in Gaza. Israel holds thousands of Palestinian civilians and resistance fighters in its prisons and detention centers, where Palestinians are often tortured and raped.

“I am ready to do a partial deal, it is no secret, that will bring back some of the people. But we are committed to continue the war after the pause in order to achieve the goal of destroying Hamas. I will not give up on this,” Netanyahu added.

This marks the first time Netanyahu has publicly rejected the deal, which, according to US President Joe Biden, was an Israeli proposal.

The deal was heavily promoted by Biden and his Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, who insisted multiple times that Israel had formally accepted its terms. A UN Security Council was passed endorsing the deal and its terms.

On Sunday, Netanyahu claimed his position opposing the deal “was no secret,” but it was the first time he had spoken publicly about a “partial deal” or suggested he hadn’t intended to implement all three phases of the Israeli proposal.

If true, this indicates that Blinken and Biden were lying when they claimed Israel had accepted the ceasefire deal while at the same time blaming Hamas for not accepting it.

Netanyahu stated further in the interview that he is not willing to accept the establishment of a Palestinian state or allow Gaza to be handed over to the Palestinian Authority. He instead suggested the Gaza tribes would help govern Gaza while Israel retains security control.

He added that Israel is fighting a war on seven fronts against the different members of the Axis of Resistance, including Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, Yemen’s Ansarallah, Iraqi and Syrian resistance groups, and Palestinian resistance groups in the West Bank.

Regarding the war with Hezbollah, Netanyahu stated, “We are obligated to the return of the residents of the north, and after the end of the operation in Rafah, we will send forces to the north. I will not keep the situation as it is in the north. We are making our preparations, but I cannot go into the details of our plans.”

In response to Netanyahu’s interview, The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) issued a statement saying the “War criminal Netanyahu unequivocally confirms he does not want to stop the war due to narrow calculations and rejects Biden’s proposal contrary to American claims.”

The PFLP statement added, “This stance articulated by Netanyahu proves he is the primary obstacle to a ceasefire agreement and suggests there is an American–‘Israeli’ game to impose a ceasefire and prisoner exchange without guarantees, allowing the occupation to resume aggression.”

Hamas issued a statement saying that Netanyahu’s rejection of the deal “is a clear affirmation of his rejection of the recent UN Security Council resolution and the proposals of US President Joe Biden, contrary to what the US administration tried to market as alleged approval by the occupation.”

The statement added that “the terrorist occupation government” is determined to continue “the genocide war against unarmed civilians in the Gaza Strip.”

Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) issued a statement saying, “The reality of the battlefield in the Gaza Strip dispels all of Netanyahu’s illusions, and the resistance is still causing the enemy losses in lives and equipment.”

The PIJ statement added, “The resistance is fine and is able to continue confronting the aggression for many months. Netanyahu’s statements about creating alternatives in the Gaza Strip are just dreams, and he has failed to achieve all his goals.”

At the same time, the Commissioner-General of the Supreme Authority of Palestinian Tribes in the Gaza Strip, Akef Al-Masry, rejected any role in governing on behalf of Israel. He stated that Israel “has not and will not be able to break the will of the Palestinian people in their right to freedom, to get rid of the occupation, to establish a Palestinian state, and to achieve the right of return.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/netanyahu ... -ceasefire

Israeli phosphorus shells burn south Lebanon after fierce Hezbollah attacks

As the threat of full-scale war looms over Lebanon, Hezbollah has vowed to confront any offensive without ‘limits, rules, or restraints’

News Desk

JUN 24, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

Hezbollah carried out several operations against Israeli military sites on 23 June, including a guided missile attack that left several casualties.


“After careful monitoring of the Israeli enemy forces at the Metulla site, when a military vehicle was spotted moving in the vicinity of the site and after arriving at the ambush point, the Mujahideen of the Islamic Resistance targeted it with guided missiles and hit it directly, which led to its destruction and the deaths and injuries of those inside it,” the resistance group said in a statement on Sunday evening.

According to Hebrew media reports, mortar shells were fired toward the site of the attack afterward to obstruct attempts at evacuating the casualties.

The Israeli army admitted that two officers in the Metulla settlement’s security team were injured in the attack, including one seriously.

Israeli journalist Moshe Yair said via social media that one soldier was killed and six others injured by the Hezbollah attack on Metulla.


Israel responded with heavy bombardment on southern Lebanon, firing large amounts of internationally banned phosphorus shells at the towns of Kfar Kila, Khiam, and Tallet al-Azziyah.


“The Israeli enemy targeted the town of Kfar Kila and the Houra area between Kfar Kila and Deirmimas with artillery shells, which led to a power outage in neighboring towns … The town of Khiam was subjected to enemy artillery and phosphorus bombardment, targeting the eastern neighborhood, the vicinity of Al-Mabarat School, the Chalets area, all the way to the Marjayoun Plain,” Lebanon’s National News Agency reported on Sunday night.

Several other guided missile and drone attacks were launched by Hezbollah that day.

Hezbollah announced earlier on Sunday that it targeted the headquarters of the Israeli army’s 91st Division in Ayelet Hashahar, northeast of the city of Safad. Earlier, it targeted the positions of Israeli army officers and soldiers of the Sahel Battalion in the Beit Hillel barracks.

Both drone attacks were a response to the Israeli assassination of a member of the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Islamic Group, along with his companion, on Saturday in the town of Al-Khyara in Lebanon’s eastern Bekaa Valley.

The Islamic Group has also carried out operations against Israel from Lebanon since the beginning of the war.

The Israeli army announced on 19 June that it has approved battle plans for an expanded attack on Lebanon, aimed at pushing Hezbollah away from the border and returning the tens of thousands of settlers that evacuated the north as a result of the Lebanese resistance’s attacks.

Since last week, Hezbollah has released two videos revealing its precise pinpointing of numerous sensitive sites across Israel, which it has vowed to attack in case of a wide-scale war on Lebanon.

The targets revealed in a video released on Saturday include the port of Ashdod, the Hadera power station, the Ramat David Military Airport in Afula, Pengrion Airport, Nevatim air base, oil refineries on the coast, and the Research Center at the Dimona Nuclear Reactor.


The clip also showed the HaKirya Complex, which includes the headquarters of the Israeli Ministry of Security and the General Staff.

In a speech on 19 June, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said that Hezbollah will fight “without limits, rules, or restraints” if a war is launched against Lebanon and that Israel will “regret” any decision to attack.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-p ... ah-attacks

Israeli war minister in Washington to plan future of Gaza, Lebanon wars

The Israeli military announced lask week it had approved 'operational plans for an offensive in Lebanon'

News Desk

JUN 23, 2024

Image
Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, right, and his US counterpart Lloyd Austin shake hands while delivering joint statements at the Kirya military base in Tel Aviv on October 13, 2023. (Photo credit: Miriam Alster/Flash90)

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant traveled to Washington, DC, on 23 June for talks with top US political and military leaders on the future of the wars in Gaza and Lebanon.

In comments released before leaving Israel, Gallant said, “The meetings with the senior [US] government officials are critical for the future of the war. We are prepared for any action that may be required in Gaza, Lebanon, and in additional areas.”

He noted, “The transition to ‘Phase 3’ in Gaza is of great importance. I will discuss this transition with US officials, touching on how it may enable additional things [to take place], and I know that we will achieve close cooperation with the US on this issue as well.”

“Stage 3” refers to a point where the “main war” is over but where the Israeli army continues to fight against Hamas' armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, and other groups in the Gaza Strip.

While in Washington, Gallant is scheduled to meet with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, CIA Director William Burns, and Special Envoy Amos Hochstein.

Gallant is accompanied by several top Israeli military officials. They are set to hold meetings with senior officials in the US military and present Israel’s plans for a potential major offensive against Hezbollah in Lebanon, as well as presenting the results of the ongoing operation in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah.

The exchange of fire between Israel and Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah has escalated in recent weeks.

Earlier this month, Israel assassinated a senior Hezbollah commander, Abu Talib, and has deepened its strikes inside Lebanon.

In return, Hezbollah has sent larger volleys of drones and missiles across the border.

Israeli leaders have recently issued statements threatening an all-out invasion of Lebanon, saying they will destroy civilian areas of Beirut and push Hezbollah’s forces away from the border and behind the Litani River.

The Israeli military recently announced that senior officers had approved “operational plans for an offensive in Lebanon.”

In a televised speech on Wednesday, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah responded by saying, “Israel knows very well that no place will be safe from our missiles and drones” if Israel launches an all-out war.

On Saturday night, Hezbollah released a video titled ‘To Whom It May Concern,’ disclosing coordinates of vital Israeli targets such as Ashdod Port, Haifa, military bases in the Negev Desert, and more.


This followed drone footage published days earlier by Hezbollah of military installations and civilian infrastructure in the Israeli city of Haifa, indicating the movement’s ability to locate and target strategic points in Israel with its vast arsenal of missiles, rockets, and drones.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-w ... banon-wars
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply