Palestine

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 20, 2024 11:31 am

Image

The new Chutzpah
By Judy Haiven’s Newsletter (Posted Aug 19, 2024)

Originally published: Judy Haiven’s Newsletter on August 7, 2024 (more by Judy Haiven’s Newsletter)

Many of you know that the Yiddish word chutzpah means extreme self-confidence or audacity. It is defined here: a young man murders his parents then throws himself on the mercy of the court because he’s an orphan. The new definition of chutzpah is Israel—the Jewish state—killing 186,000 people in ten months, denying it, then getting Jews around the world to also deny it.

The longer Israel’s war on Gaza goes on, the more frenzied and desperate pro-Israel Jews in Canada become. A few months ago pro-Israel Jews pleaded for the release of the hostages, and tried to pressure Netanyahu to release the Jewish hostages. But the powerful in Israel, led by Netanyahu, turned a deaf ear and refused to even consider some kind of hostage/prisoner exchange beyond a very limited one in November 2023. Now we seldom hear a word about the hostages. In fact the pro-Israel community is so slavish toward Israel that whatever those in power in Israel say—well Canadian Jews are merely Israel’s echo chamber. The pro-Israel Jews just go along with it. No matter how ridiculous, dangerous, or dishonest.

Why Do Some Jews Go Along With Genocide?
But why? I don’t recall one other war, or one other public issue that we Canadians are forbidden from talking about, prevented from taking action against, labelled as terrorists, or Hamas lovers because we demand a ceasefire. We demand Israel stop it’s heinous genocide against millions of mainly women and children in Gaza and the West Bank.

But if we dare speak against Israel, or in favour of Palestinians, we can be fired, harassed, doxxed, denied jobs, not allowed to graduate, and more. In this column, I’ll look at the many aspects of the “cancel culture” used by those in the pro-Israel establishment and their friends such as evangelical Christians.

You will have to bear with me. This is a detailed account of pro-Israel individuals and institutions such as B’nai Brith and the Simon Wiesenthal Center that have taken on the duties of stopping any discussion about or sympathy toward Palestinians.

First I want to mention these facts:

The pro-Israel Jewish community in Canada denies that Israel has wantonly killed at least 40,000 Palestinians—overwhelmingly women and children—in cold blood since October 7. The Lancet claims the figure could more likely be 186,000—which includes all the people who died in the collapsed buildings, and those who have died of injuries, disease and starvation which Gazans have had to endure for many months.
The pro-Israel Jewish community also denies that in the Gaza strip, Israel has destroyed more than 412,000 buildings, mostly homes, 80% of schools, virtually all 18 hospitals (only 3 are partially open), all 12 Gaza universities, 241 mosques, and many churches.
Another thing the pro-Israel Jews deny is that Israel has deliberately slowed or stopped food and water deliveries to Gaza, causing mass starvation. Without food and water shipments, Israel has forced all Gazans to drink polluted water and many to eat grass and leaves. Now in Gaza, there is evidence of Polio. The UN reported in June an increase in Hepatitis A, dysentery and gastroenteritis. Many people are also noting the spread of a highly contagious skin disease in Gaza.
I don’t think one Canadian Jew has lost a business, a profession, a career, a home, a job, an opportunity because of antisemitism
Canada’s pro-Israel Jews (in denying or ignoring all of the above) have found a way to try to get a very different message across and to keep debate away from Gaza. Their message is that Jews in Canada are facing horrifying cases of antisemitism. An antisemitism so vile and pernicious that not one Jew we know of has lost his or her job. No Jew has lost their place in medical school or any professional school, their livelihood, their housing, their supply of water or food, their opportunity to pray and live in any community in Canada. No Canadian Jew has lost their ability to practice law, dentistry, engineering, science, medicine or any other profession. Not one Jew in Canada has been wounded, maimed or killed because they are a Jew.

The pro-Israel Jews stoke the lie that they are the ones under fire, and refuse to reference or even think about the genocide of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank—savagely killed by Israel— the state that claims to speak for all Jews worldwide.

Image
Patrick Chappattee: International Justice Pursues Netanyahu (May, 2024).

This world is topsy-turvy.

Students who oppose Israel’s genocide have their tents ripped down, get arrested and find their student status in jeopardy because the establishment Jews complain to the universities that they don’t want the tents or any reminder of Palestinians’ lives on campuses.
Some students who support Palestinians human rights are told that they cannot graduate, are barred from interning or articling jobs if they dare to wear a keffiyah, or sign a letter for a ceasefire
Let’s look at some of the areas in which those who support Palestine or dare to question or oppose Israel have felt the full weight of pro-Israel forces cancelling them, and trying to destroy them. This is by no means a comprehensive list, but it is a list of what the pro-Israel groups have done to stop free speech, and to punish anyone who supports the Palestinians.

Medicine
There are at least 10 doctors in the Toronto area who have been suspended or lost their jobs, or faced possible discipline because they used social media to condemn Israeli genocide.
The “whisper campaign” includes targeting medical students and profs who signed open letters for a ceasefire, or posted against genocide social media. In the last couple of years Dr Ritika Goel is one of 3,000 healthcare professionals, a professor at the Temerty School of Medicine at the University of Toronto who had signed an open letter to express solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza—where Israel had killed Palestinian doctors and bombed clinics. She was labelled as pro-Palestinian, and “antisemitic” but sympathetic to terrorism and more—though she is a medical professor at the University of Toronto’s Temerty School of Medicine. She had friends willing to help her fight, so she was able to retain her position.
Dr Yipeng Ge was tossed from his medical residency program by a pro-Israel doctor who didn’t like Ge’s posts in support of Palestine. Ge was then taunted and humiliated because of his stance when he was the student representative on the board of the Canadian Medical Association. He was suspended from that role as well. Ge, who has a medical degree from the University of Ottawa, had gone to Harvard for training. He has also done medical/humanitarian work in Gaza.
Dr Gem Newman the Univ. of Manitoba’s medical school valedictorian called out medical professionals and associations for “deafening silence” on the humanitarian crisis there. College of medicine dean Dr. Peter Nickerson, called Newman’s remarks “divisive and inflammatory,” Businessman Ernest Rady, who donated $30-million in memory of his late father an early U of M medical graduate who was Jewish. Rady was furious and called the Newman speech “hate speech… and lies.” He demanded that the film of commencement—notably Newman’s speech—not be posted on social media.
Arij Al Khafagi was suspended from the Univ. of Manitoba nursing program because she dared to criticize Israel in her social media posts—“condemning the Israeli government and the military for the atrocious acts that they were committing.” Al Khafagi was the president of the U of Manitoba’s Nursing Students’ Association. Her suspension lasted 3 months—until an investigation decided she was “not antisemitic.” She was then reinstated, and noted, “I don’t have an agenda of hate or bias or anything. I share the perspective of unity and humanity.”

Image
By Banksy (UK)

Dr Ben Thomson, a nephrologist at the Mackenzie Richmond Hill Hospital north of Toronto, was disciplined by his hospital for posting pro-Palestinian social media. He dared to say that there is no evidence of Hamas decapitating babies. He was suspended from practice for months, and he had to move house because of threats he received including this: “This message is for Dr. Ben Thomson. Remove your post regarding Israel. It is disgusting, you are a disgusting human being, you do not know what you’re saying, and if you do not remove it, I advise you and the rest of your staff to stay out of your office.” He is now suing the hospital and some of the doctors.

Law
Law firms in the Toronto have announced they won’t give jobs to articling students mostly from Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU) and York University who signed a letter in support of Palestinians. More than 74 law students signed an open letter for a ceasefire. A retired chief justice from Nova Scotia exonerated these students of antisemitism, but don’t hold your breath waiting for those law firms to reverse their decision.
Ontario’s Ministry of the Attorney General required TMU law students applying for jobs to sign a form saying they did not sign an open letter in support of Palestine in October.
Culture
The Royal Ontario Museum (ROM) was forced to revise wording of exhibit on Palestinans’ dispossession for a show in Oct. 2023, “Being and Belonging”

Image
Hunger in Gaza, this Feb. 2024 cartoon is by Anne Derenne (aka Adene). Derenne is French and lives in Spain.

The ROM stopped its art show Death, Life’s Greatest Mystery which profiled Palestinian artists who portrayed the culture around Muslim death and burial; it was only allowed to go ahead, when the ROM also featured Jewish burials.

Indigenous art curator at the Art Gallery of Ontario Wanda Nanibush left her job of nine years after supporting Palestnians’ rights after Oct. 7. It’s not clear if she was fired, but she definitely was harassed because of her pro-Palestinian politics.
A number of artists and curators accused the Art Canada Institute (ACI) of trying to suppress Lands Within, a photography exhibit that amplified the voices of a group of Arab and Muslim artists. The online art platform, which is part of the University of Toronto, demanded that some of the photos be subject to a last minute “sensitivity review” to ensure they would not offend. Many artists withdrew from the show and it was cancelled in Nov. 2023. Artists also withdrew from projects with the ACI, because the ACI’s executive director Sara Angel supported a letter that targeted former Art Gallery of Ontario curator Wanda Nanibush (see below).
Two women who were marshals at a pro-Palestine rally were assaulted, one knocked to the ground, by a man more than twice their age in St John’s NF. In 43 weeks of marches in support of Palestine, this has been the only violent act.
Education
Students who participated in the McGill encampment were called “antisemites” by the university administration threatened with not being allowed back to classes, or not graduating.
The pro-Israel lobby, despite no physical evidence, says students are scared by the pro-Palestinian encampments at at least a dozen universities across Canada. All but one encampment have now been shut down.
A school board in the London, Ontario area has banned t-shirts that read “Free Palestine,” though “Free Ukraine” is acceptable.
A student in a high school in (near Toronto) was addressed by a guidance counsellor in a “harmful and discriminatory anti-Palestinian racist language.” The teacher was sent home for “likening a student to a terrorist for wearing a Keffiyeh.”
The Toronto District School Board has persecuted Javier Dávila because, as part of his job of sending information to the teachers, he sent materials that supported the Palestinian cause. He was suspended by the Toronto Board. This is his third complaint before a tribunal at the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
In what is being billed as an “example of anti-Palestinian racism in Windsor, a video circulated on social media shows a young woman denied entry to a St. Clair College facility for wearing a keffiyeh.In a video posted to social media in May, a security can be heard telling the person recording she is not allowed inside the St. Clair College Centre for the Arts in Windsor, Ontario—ostensibly for wearing a keffiyeh, which he refers to as a “scarf” in the video. “I know what it means. You’re not allowed in here,” the guard was heard saying.
Seven students who stayed at the encampment to pressure the University of Waterloo to cut all financial and academic connections to Israel were sued by the university for $1.5 million, for property damage, trespass and intimidation. One of the encampment leaders calls this bullying and intimidation by the administration. The university would only drop the lawsuit if the students abandoned and shut down the encampment. So that is what they had to do.
13 pro-Israel faculty members are taking Simon Fraser University Faculty Union to court for passing motions that support Palestine and a ceasefire.
An Ottawa student was suspended for posting a Palestinian flag on their online profile.
City police removed a student at Humber College in Toronto for putting up stickers which said Boycott Israeli apartheid.

Image
By Banksy (UK)

McGill University and the Students’ Society of McGill University (SSMU) revoked the McGill name from the student group Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights (SPHR). Prompted by McGill’s Vice-provost, it seems the students’ society, fearful of other sanctions, agreed to to this.

In October, student groups at McGill University, University of British Columbia, University of Toronto, Toronto Metropolitan University, and York University held rallies and published statements showing their support for the people of Palestine and calling for an end to the ongoing genocide in Gaza. In response, each university administration condemned the statements and threatened to decertify the student unions. On Oct. 13, Liberal MP Anthony Housefather demanded York University decertify its three student associations to maintain a “safe space for Jewish and ‘pro-Israel’ students on campus.”
Employment
Four waitresses from a Moxies in Toronto were fired for applauding a pro-Palestine rally as it went by the restaurant. They were fired because B’nai Brith decided to contact the restaurant management and complain about “antisemitism.”
Dozens of Jewish doctors used a “black list” to deny residency places to students who may have supported Palestinians
Birju Dattani was denied the job as the CEO of the Canadian Human Rights Commission when B’nai Brith, Canadian Friends of Simon Wiesenthal backed up by the federal Conservative party revealed that Dattani sat on a panel with pro-Palestine speakers—when he was a grad student in the UK.
The CBC has disciplined and stopped reporters and producers from exposing what Israel is really doing in Gaza.

Image
Cartoon by Emanuele Del Rosso (Italian, dated Oct. 2023).

Zahraa Al-Akrass, an on-air reporter, was fired from Global TV because she posted pro-Palestinian comments on social media

Yara Jamal was a video editor at CTV in Halifax. She was fired because she (a Canadian born in Palestine) “sympathized” with the Palestinian cause.
Wanda Nanibush, Indigenous curator at the Art Gallery of Ontario, criticized Israel’s genocide. After nine years she left the Gallery, but many think she was let go because of her outspoken support for Palestinians.
Politicians
In Victoria BC, city councillor Susan Kim was able to keep her job by a thread after Victoria City Council lambasted her for signing an open letter that called for a ceasefire in Gaza, and “liking” a tweet in support of Palestinians. An investigator found that she did not draw the line between being a councillor and a private citizen. So far punishment is pending.
Sarah Jama (Ontario NDP-MPP) was forced out of the NDP caucus because of her stand on Israel. She was accused by the caucus colleagues of being antisemitic, and pro-Palestinian.
Marat Stiles, leader of the Ontario NDP, was forced to grovel an apology to the Jewish establishment for daring to tweet that at a recent craft fair she attended, she liked “beautiful Palestinian embroidery.” She was pressured by the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre to remove her post.
In April 2024, the speaker of the Ontario legislature banned anyone from wearing a keffiyeh in the legislative chamber.
The Speaker at the Ontario legislature also ordered MPP Sarah Jama to leave, as she was wearing a Keffiyah. When she did not go, he barred her from voting that day.

https://mronline.org/2024/08/19/the-new-chutzpah/

(Another blow to the illusion that Canada is a nicer version of the USA.)

*****

Media Claim "Hamas Rejects ..." Deal That's Not Offered

Axios claims that Hamas rejects a ceasefire deal with Israel:

Hamas rejects new U.S. proposal for Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal

The opener:

Hamas on Sunday rejected an updated U.S. proposal for a ceasefire and hostage deal in Gaza, blaming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for moving the goalposts and the U.S. for indulging him.

Seven paragraphs later we learn:

Zoom in: More specifically, Hamas objects to the fact that the proposal doesn't include a permanent ceasefire or comprehensive Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.

There is no ceasefire deal.

How then could Hamas reject a ceasefire deal?

There is only a potential agreement on a pause in the fighting to hand over to Israel the hostages it wants to retrieve.

Which is nothing anyone in the situation in Gaza could agree to.

Posted by b on August 19, 2024 at 6:17 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/08/h ... l#comments

(Such cheap electioneering is a Biden trademark.)

*****

Why the Israelis Are Incapable of Implementing a Ceasefire
August 17, 2024

Image
Why the Israelis are incapable of implementing a ceasefire. Photo: Batoul Chamas/Al Mayadeen English.

By Robert Inlakesh – Aug 16, 2024

Despite empty ceasefire talks, the failure of the US and “Israel” reveals a grim reality; the Zionist dream is crumbling into perpetual war and economic collapse.

A lot of value has again been placed upon useless ceasefire negotiations supposedly aimed at ending the war in Gaza, despite Hamas having rejected involvement in the hamster wheel process that the US is telling the world represents a serious diplomatic effort. In reality, a regional conflict has already been opened, the pre-October 7 world will never return and the future of the Zionist Entity is to remain in a state of perpetual war.

Let’s be clear, if the US government wanted a ceasefire, it would have already happened or will be announced suddenly. The framework is already there for it, a deal could be implemented and every Israeli held in Gaza would eventually be exchanged for a large sum of Palestinian detainees. We need not go back far to demonstrate that such a ceasefire and prisoner exchange is possible, a smaller truce and prisoner swap occurred in November of last year which proved that Hamas would implement such an agreement. Yet, neither the US nor their Israeli allies seek a meaningful ceasefire and only play with this notion for political purposes.

Eventually there will need to be a ceasefire in Gaza, likely following a large escalation across the West Asia region, but even in the event that this takes place sooner rather than later, the war will continue elsewhere.

The level of genocidal extremism that is present at every level of Israeli society is not ignorable. We are no longer talking about the intelligent politicians, dog whistles and sanitized rhetoric of the past, this is raw and brazen ethno-supremacy. Itamar Ben Gvir is the Israeli Police Minister and Bezalel Smotrich is the entity’s finance minister, they aren’t some kind of fringe elements of the settler movement in the West Bank, they directly control the regime’s policy.

There are no notable Israeli political forces that oppose the war in Gaza and no notable anti-war demonstrations at all from Jewish Israelis, even the 98-Palestinians living in the occupied territories are often too intimidated to dare hold demonstrations, despite their heartache at what is happening in Gaza. The demonstrations that frequently take place against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, are motivated out of concern for the Israeli captives held in Gaza and the soldiers dying at the hands of the resistance, there is no concern for Palestinian civilians.

Western liberals have presented the argument that Israelis are fed up with Netanyahu and that he would be pushed out of power suddenly if there was an election, in order to suggest that somehow there is a voice of reason opposed to the current leadership. This is based upon outdated polls, the latest of which now suggest that the Israeli Premier currently remains the most popular politician and that despite projections that he couldn’t secure a coalition, he would still outperform his opposition. Yet this is irrelevant, as the issue that many Israelis have with Benjamin Netanyahu is not that he is waging a genocidal war that is slaughtering tens of thousands of children. We know this because all the polls suggest that the overwhelming majority of the Zionist public believe that enough or not enough force is being used in the Gaza Strip, while the number of those who believe that too much force has been used remains in the low single digits (percentage wise).

Why point this out? Because the Zionist dream has been broken on every level. We are now well past the idea of an Israeli “deterrence capacity”, let alone expansionism, it has become apparent to anyone with eyes that the Zionist regime has no way of dealing with the threats posed from Lebanon, Yemen, Syria, Iran and Iraq, besides opening up a wider regional war. The Zionist regime’s military has failed in the Gaza Strip to defeat the Palestinian resistance and is now left with no way out other than a wider regional war or ceasefire.



If we look at the state of the Israeli economy, tourism is dead, 46,000 businesses have declared bankruptcy, imports and exports have plummeted, investors are withdrawing, multi-billion dollar projects are falling through, the Port of Eilat has gone bust, the value of the Shekel has fallen and the list goes on. In the north of occupied Palestine, industry is dead, settlements have been evacuated and were/are pummeled with missiles, drones and rockets, while over 100,000 displaced have nowhere to turn.

The Israeli military is exhausted and has scattered its soldiers across the fronts in Gaza, the West Bank and northern occupied Palestine, while they deal with a lack of tanks and armored personnel carriers in the event that war in the north opens up. Their ill-trained, ill-disciplined and overworked soldiers are clearly incapable of fighting the likes of Hezbollah.

All of this is obvious and this weakness has brought out the very worst in Israelis that had already adopted an apartheid ideology. Deep down, they all would like to return to the delusional racist bubble world in which they lived prior to October 7, but it isn’t possible. The world will never forget what has been done and the survivors will never abandon their struggle for self-determination.

The idea that their racist settler colony can exist in prosperity at the expense of the entire region is under threat, an existential threat, and with this, so too is American hegemony. This is why neither Washington nor Tel Aviv will back down from their position of pursuing “victory”. For Benjamin Netanyahu personally, he is surrounded by a coalition of extremist nut jobs that he helped nurture into power, a project that began in 2005. Behind him also is an Israeli public that wants their captives returned and may apply some pressure in that regard, but also wants to see Gaza wiped off of the map for good. So there is no incentive for him to end the war in Gaza from the US or domestically, since the resistance forces across the region are the only ones that can apply real pressure.

If you want a good indication of how the Israeli society thinks, following the declaration by International Criminal Court (ICC) chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, that he was calling for an arrest warrant against the Israeli premier, Netanyahu’s support surged in the polls at the time. Or, look at the fact that it was completely acceptable for the issue of gang-raping a defenseless Palestinian prisoner, who died from his wounds and was held without a charge, to be debated in the Israeli Knesset, with a member of Netanyahu’s Likud Party passionately defending the gang-rapists. One of the gang-rapists was even invited on Israeli television to advocate for the actions committed by him and follow soldiers, despite there being a video that showed the horrifying incident. There were even protests that broke out in favor of 10 soldiers accused of involvement in the case of gang-rape, who Ben-Gvir called heroes, and an Israeli legal representative organisation for four of the accused argued that the gang-rape occurred in self defense.

Whether we look at the Israeli political elite, military, police, intelligence, society or media, we see genocidal mania. This is because their narcissistic supremacist ideology is collapsing before their very eyes, they are beginning to realize that maintaining apartheid is no longer viable.

The opportunity for the Israelis to implement the only solution that would have enabled them to continue their existence has passed. If the Zionist regime was actually serious about the Oslo Accords and simply accepted international law as the consensus for a so-called two-state solution, they could have perhaps proceeded and actually maintained their regime. However, allowing the Palestinian people to gain access to basic human rights in only 22% of historic Palestine was not possible for them under their racist expansionist ideology.

We are now reaching the final phase of this settler colonial project and the Israelis have come to the realization that maintaining their ethno-supremacist regime of absolute privilege will mean exterminating and ethnically cleansing everyone in their way. They are so immersed in their own collective form of narcissism, in which they view themselves as both the victim and hero of the story, that stopping now is impossible. This is also why Israeli society is split down the middle on the question of what kind of ethno-supremacist regime they seek: whether that will be a secular or religious regime going forward.

Therefore, with full US backing they are slowly committing national suicide. This may be a process that is somewhat delayed if a ceasefire is reached in Gaza that prevents the immediate end of the regime by military means, but the war will continue in other ways. The West Bank will likely end up becoming their punching bag until they can again escalate elsewhere and the only promise that can be made to their own people is a future of perpetual war.

https://orinocotribune.com/why-the-isra ... ceasefire/

******

The Chris Hedges Report: Israel’s Mask Is Slipping
August 19, 2024

“No going back to Oct. 6” — David Hearst, editor-in-chief of Middle East Eye, lays out the essential context of the conflict in Gaza and what to anticipate going forward.

By Chris Hedges
ScheerPost

The latest chapter of Israel’s occupation of Palestine has raged on for nearly the last year, marking a significant shift in the decades-long clash that has already initiated the demystification of the mythology behind Israel.

Truth continues to be the first casualty of war in this particular struggle, as it has been massacred, through the killings of journalists in Gaza and the censorship of dissidents, throughout the conflict along with the Palestinians themselves.

Unfortunately for Israel, however, the state’s lies and brutality this time are too severe to escape the eyes of the global stage, and even its own people.

As David Hearst, co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of Middle East Eye, states in this interview:

“There are huge tensions in Israel about how the war was prosecuted, particularly the central tension is the obvious fact that Israel has been killing its own hostages through military action, obviously. And the narrative from Israel that Israel is pushing Hamas to release hostages is nonsense.

It is the exact opposite. The main killer of the hostages has been the bombing campaign. So there is a huge protest about getting the hostages home. And getting the hostages home means ending the war, basically.”

Hearst joins host Chris Hedges on the second episode of The Chris Hedges Report to offer a clear and direct explanation of the complexities surrounding the conflict, providing essential context on what to anticipate moving forward.

“What we’ve got to get really clear about is that our idea of left and right, or our idea of moderates and extremists, does not translate to Israeli realities. And when it comes to killing as many Palestinians as they can, everyone is up for it,” Hearst tells Hedges.

The brazen violence that journalists like Hearst and others have reported on is pulling Israel’s mask of nobility down, and revealing its true face as the “ugly, repressive, hate-filled apartheid regime it always has been.”

Hearst claims that “there is a blood lust going through Israel.” He proves this point through stories of the brutality, demonstrating how for Israel “there’s absolutely no attempt to distinguish between someone carrying a gun or a rocket launcher and someone carrying a bottle of water.” In other words, all Palestinians are automatically “terrorists” — guilty of crimes punishable by death — to the Israelis.

This indiscriminate tactic of killing has exposed Israel for what it truly is. The live streamed suffering of the Palestinians, and the violence of the Israelis, is too great for the apartheid regime to hide once the genocide is over. Israel will become synonymous with its victims, just as the violent regimes of the past have.



Credits

Host: Chris Hedges

Producer: Max Jones

Intro: Max Jones and Diego Ramos

Crew: Diego Ramos, Sofia Menemenlis and Thomas Hedges

Transcript

Chris Hedges: Israel has been poisoned by the psychosis of permanent war. It has been morally bankrupted by the sanctification of victimhood, which it uses to justify an occupation that is even more savage than that of apartheid South Africa. Its “democracy” — which was always exclusively for Jews — has been hijacked by extremists who are pushing the country towards fascism.

Human rights campaigners, intellectuals and journalists — Israeli and Palestinian — are subject to constant state surveillance, arbitrary arrests and government-run smear campaigns. Its educational system, starting in primary school, is an indoctrination machine for the military. And the greed and corruption of its venal political and economic elite have created vast income disparities, a mirror of the decay within America’s democracy, along with a culture of anti-Arab and anti-Black racism.

By the time Israel achieves its decimation of Gaza — Israel is talking about months of warfare that will continue at least until the end of this year — it will have signed its own death sentence. Its facade of civility, its supposed vaunted respect for the rule of law and democracy, its mythical story of the courageous Israeli military and miraculous birth of the Jewish nation —which it successfully sold to its Western audiences — will lie in ash heaps. Israel’s social capital will be spent. It will be revealed as the ugly, repressive, hate-filled apartheid regime it always has been, alienating younger generations of American Jews.

Its patron, the United States, as new generations come into power, will distance itself from Israel. Its popular support will come from reactionary Zionists and America’s Christianized fascists who see Israel’s domination of ancient Biblical land as a harbinger of the Second Coming and in its subjugation of Arabs a kindred racism and celebration of white supremacy.

Israel will become synonymous with its victims the way Turks are synonymous with the Armenians; Germans are with the Namibians and later the Jews; and Serbs are with the Bosniaks.

Israel’s cultural, artistic, journalistic and intellectual life will be exterminated. Israel will be a stagnant nation where the religious fanatics, bigots and Jewish extremists who have seized power will dominate public discourse. It will join the club of the globe’s most despotic regimes.

Joining me to discuss the future of Israel and the decades long effort by Zionists to dispossess Palestinians from their land is David Hearst, editor in chief of Middle East Eye, an independent website based in London covering the Middle East in English and French.

Image
David Hearst on The Chris Hedges Report. (Screengrab)

David Hearst: Well, you’re dead right, I don’t think there’s any going back to October the sixth, and it stripped away an awful lot of the fig leaves that at least liberal Zionists, certainly in Britain, were operating under for far too long and getting away with it.

I’d like to push back a little bit on that comment that Israel has been hijacked by extremists, because historically, I don’t see it that way. I see Zionism as a two-speed venture.

You can have the salami-slice tactics of the so-called moderate center ground, which is basically one settlement at a time. Nothing too much. An awful lot of left and right. All these ghastly settlers are here, whatever. The sort of language that Jonathan Freedland, my former colleague, used to talk about again and again, and it was used very cleverly to stop BDS, to stop sanctions against Israel.

The argument being that if you sanction the good guys, the right wing will take over. This idea of left and right in Zionism — I think Gaza stripped all that away.

And I see Zionism as a two speed operation. It either goes in salami slices, it either goes bit-by-bit, quite cleverly, one street at a time, or it goes like Ben-Gvir in fifth gear, like a tank. And you literally say, this is “Eretz Israel.” This is the “Land of Israel,” the biblical Land of Israel, we’re God’s chosen people and we’re going to shoot everyone that’s around. And the vengeance that we seek on or wreak on Gaza is biblical vengeance. So I’m not sure Israel has been hijacked by extremists.

I think the Zionist colonial project was extremist in the first place. And the more you go back, there is no such thing as a proper Israel, a clean Israel. There is always one massacre lurking in the shadows. There is Tantura, there is a whole bunch of massacres. There’s the poisoning of the wells.

Image
Expulsion of Tantura civilians following the Tantura massacre in May 1948. (Benno Rothenberg /Meitar Collection / National Library of Israel / The Pritzker Family National Photography Collection, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

There’s… you know the history better than I do so I see Zionism as a two- speed operation, and now it’s in fifth gear, and it is going for broke. And the idea that Israel isn’t Israel for all its citizens, has long been thrown up, thrown out the window.

Excuse me. It’s an Israel for Jews only. And the width of discussion about Gaza is much narrower than we in the West like to imagine. So I’d just like to recall a recent event, which is the motion of the Knesset. The Knesset passed a bill basically saying that they are outlawing a creation of a Palestinian state, and they had two objections to a Palestinian state. The first one was that if we create a Palestinian state, Hamas will take it over. It will become Gaza in the middle of us, and we can’t tolerate that. Okay, all right. You, given what happened on October the seventh, you could make a case for that just.

However, what the real intent of the motion was, it says, we cannot have a Palestinian state inside the Land of Israel, absolutely where we were 3,000 years ago, 2,000 years ago, etc. And that is the Zionist project. So that has to be a real warning light.

So everyone who keeps on mouthing in the West, I mean every single party in the West — the Labour Party in Britain, the French, the Germans, the U.N., the U.S. — all talk about a two state solution.

Well, who on the Israeli side is going to take away now, 700,000, more than 700,000 settlers? Who on the Israeli side is actually going to see… even if you are a … dinosaur that recognizes Israel who is there on the other side now to talk to?

And I think we’ve really got to challenge the idea of a two state solution by simply going to the West Bank, or inviting everyone to go to the West Bank, looking at all those twinkling lights on the hills and saying, Who’s going to shift that lot? Who’s going to shift the roads? Who’s going to shift the 17,18 industrial estates in the West Bank? Try driving between Jerusalem and South Hebron Hills, and just see how many roadblocks you have to go through. Just do that straight…

Chris Hedges: I was just in Ramallah. I just went to Ramallah about 10 days ago. And you know to go from Ramallah to Nablus, which should take 90 minutes, takes seven hours. You’re exactly right. I want to clarify, because you’re right about Zionism when I talk about extremism, and let’s not forget that the Nakba and in 1967 these were liberal Zionists who oversaw the worst atrocities against Palestinians.

But the difference, I think, and I lived in Israel for a while, is that the liberal Zionists, and it was all a veneer, I mean, it didn’t make any difference for the Palestinians, but they fought against the religious Zionists. Meir Kahane, for instance, in the 1990s his Kach Party was outlawed, and then the government, Ben Gvir and these figures, are essentially heirs to Kahane, in some ways, they’re more honest than the liberal Zionist. So you are exactly right, that the Zionist project and all you have to do is read the private letters of Ben Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel, the leader, in essence, the leader of the pre-1948 Zionist Movement. Read his letters. He’s quite frank.

Image
Ben Gurion speaking at the cornerstone laying ceremony for the building of the Histadrut, which would become Israel’s national trade union, in Jerusalem, 1924. (National Photo Collection of Israel, Wikimedia Commons, Public domain)

He sounds like Jabotinsky, the right wing, I think Mussolini, at one point called him a good fascist, the heir to the Herut Party, which Bibi Netanyahu, his father was one of the founders of that came out of the Stern gang and these terrorist groups, Menachem Begin and others that killed both British officials and Palestinians.

So yes, you’re exactly right, that Zionism, the engine of Zionism itself, has never altered. But the face of Zionism, I think these religious Zionists, the liberal Zionists, and certainly when I lived in Israel, the liberal Zionists in the nature of Kach, the Kach Party and Kahane. They banish these people. And now we have seen a triumph of these settler religious fanatics over liberal Zionism. I guess that was the point I was trying to make.

David Hearst: Yeah, you’re absolutely right. And there was a lot of pushback in those days of the Jewish underground. And in fact, there was a plot by the Jewish underground, by all the same people we’re talking about now, to blow up Al Aqsa, and that was diffused by security forces. The difference now, of course, is that security forces are completely overtaken with settlers.

Chris Hedges: And the military. It used to be that if you were a settler, you could not rise within the security forces or the military.

David Hearst: Yeah, absolutely. And now, of course, you’ve got [Bezalel] Smotrich, you’ve got Ben-Gvir, actually, with official positions in terms of both the finance and also the border police. So they are not just part of the government, but they are a very active part of that government.

I think the point I was trying to make with the Knesset vote was that Benny Gantz voted for it along with, you know, most of the parties.

So the idea of there being extremists and moderates when it comes to the Palestinians, when it comes to judicial reform, okay, there’s a real battle going on for control between the religious Zionists and Ashkenazi Zionists, if you want to call them, or, you know, people who style themselves in the center ground, but on Palestine, on shoot to kill or shoot everyone, it’s not even shoot to kill, it’s shooting everyone in Gaza, there is no distinction at all.

Benny Gantz, I believe, in one of his election videos, boasted about how many Palestinians he’d killed when he was in charge. There’s very little pushback. There was a letter sent to all the congressional leaders, I think it was about 48 hours ago, from an oppressive array of ex-IDF, ex-Mossad, [inaudible], like quite a quite a few big names, basically saying that Netanyahu was a criminal and shouldn’t address Congress, but they didn’t mention the International Criminal Court or the International Court of Justice.

Image
Gantz, then chief of general staff of the IDF and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meeting in 2013. (Prime Minister of Israel, Flickr)

They didn’t mention genocide or war crimes. What they were talking about was the submarine affair. They were talking about bribery and corruption, and they were still saying that Iran is an existential enemy and that Netanyahu poses an existential threat to Israel because he’s just mucking things up. They’re not saying that the whole project is wrong and will lead just to a regional war. They’re not backing away from that. They’re not backing away from trying to do the impossible and eradicate, uproot Hamas from Gaza.

So what we’ve got to get really clear about is that our idea of left and right, or our idea of moderates and extremists, does not translate to Israeli realities. And when it comes to killing as many Palestinians as they can, everyone is up for it. There is a blood lust going through Israel. I use the word biblical vengeance, but it is sickening what they think they can get away with and what still has got to come out.

One of the most horrifying stories came out of the Israeli army, I refuse to call it, by the way, the Israeli Defense Forces, because I don’t use the word IDF, I say Israeli army. One of those horrifying tales of Israel came out in an extremely good website, 972, I’m sure you know, and it was the testimony of six, I think, soldiers, all anonymous, who had been reservists in Gaza. And let me just read you some of the things that they said about how it is that so many civilians have died in Gaza. It’s somewhere up at the moment, near 40,000 but there’s probably another 10,000 under the rubble. If you read The Lancet in Britain, there could be three times as many dead, what they call indirect deaths.

So that’s the scale of it. And you ask yourself, how, why? How’s it happened? Has it all been in-fighting? Is it crossfire? What is it? Absolutely not.

According to soldier B, any Palestinian in Gaza can inadvertently find themselves a target: “it’s forbidden to walk around, and everyone who’s outside is suspicious. If we see someone in a window looking at us, he’s a suspect. You shoot.”

Soldier A said that in the operations room, destroying buildings often felt like a computer game. Anyone caught in one of Israel’s kill zones could be targeted by or who is targeted by a bored soldier could be counted as a terrorist. So there’s absolutely no attempt to distinguish between someone carrying a gun or a rocket launcher and someone carrying a bottle of water. And there’s another soldier who said that the policy, there was a policy of torching Palestinian homes after they had been taken over as temporary locations for soldiers. So they said the principle was, if you move on, you have to burn down the house.

And according to soldier B, his company burned hundreds of houses.

Soldier A said, “I can count on one hand the number of cases in which we were told not to shoot, even with sensitive things like schools, approval feels like a formality. No one will shed a tear if we flatten a house when there is no need or we shoot someone we didn’t have to.”

Soldier S said that the Caterpillar bulldozers cleared the areas of corpses, buried them under the rubble, flips them aside so the convoys don’t see them. See the images of people in advanced stages of decay, they don’t come out. This is how the Russians behaved in Ukraine, and just none of it is getting through.

Now, if peace does break out, and unfortunately, I don’t think it will, because I think that’s locked up, we can talk about this in Netanyahu’s very, very sick brain. But if there is a ceasefire, these stories will multiply, and we will get the full horror of war crimes.

So the whole Western push to protect Israel, particularly the American push, [President Joe] Biden’s push to protect Israel against war crimes, will crumble under a mountain of evidence that is going to come out about actually what happened.

What were the deaths? What happened, for instance, in the second time Israel stormed Al Shifa hospital?

According to my information, they got 800 people out. Most of them were government workers shot them dead and then bulldozed the bodies and crushed the bodies and pulverized them. That is, like, you know, these sort of scenes are scenes reminiscent of Srebrenica. So it’s only just coming. I think our support for Israel is just about to tumble under the weight of this truly horrifying evidence, which, you know, it feels like we’ve been writing solidly now for nine months, but is underreported.

Chris Hedges: Yeah, I covered Srebrenica. I was there in Bosnia for Srebrenica. Let’s talk about what’s happening in Gaza. I’m really interested in your take. It doesn’t seem to me that Israel really has any clear idea of where it’s going at all. There was an early effort, obviously, to drive the Palestinians into the Sinai. [U.S. Secretary of State Anony] Blinken went around and tried to get Iraq and Jordan to accept a certain number of, quota of Palestinians. This was roundly rejected.

I was just in Egypt, and the Egyptian journalists were telling me that the military has been unequivocal to the Sisi government, that no Palestinian will come over, be pushed out of Rafah into the Sinai. So how do you read where Israel thinks it’s going and then how do you see where everything is going?

David Hearst: Well, you’re absolutely right. I think it was the Egyptian army, not Sisi, but the Egyptian army that stopped that one. They said, absolutely not. This is an existential threat for the Egyptian state if you had a Palestinian enclave in the Sinai.

And I think Egypt is very, very sore about Rafah being bulldozed. Because, one, it was a source of income, quite a big source of income. But two, as you know, it was their Palestinian card. It was their foreign policy. Now, Egypt has been made irrelevant as an actor in Libya. It’s been made completely irrelevant in Sudan, a country it once ruled, and that’s been made irrelevant in Gaza and Palestine. And that’s a big, big deal for certainly the Mukhabarat and the GIS and the general security.

Image
Israeli tanks on the Gaza side of the Rafah crossing on May 7. (IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

So Israel’s tactic in Gaza was really quite simple. It was to seal all the land borders and create a port and push the Palestinians into the sea. And there were ministers who voiced exactly this. There’s a lot of oral evidence for the South African genocide case, and there’s a lot of evidence, oral statements, about pushing the Palestinians into the sea or thinning out the Palestinian population. In fact, Ron Dermer, who is Benjamin Netanyahu’s point man, was asked in December by Netanyahu to develop a plan to thin out the Palestinian population.

So ethnic cleansing and another enactment was absolutely the aim, and still probably is the aim of the Israeli government.

In terms of the various options they are trying to do, they’re absolutely at sea. They tried two main plans. Firstly, they phoned up all of the 32 tribal chiefs in Gaza, and only one agreed to work with them.

Then came a statement from the tribal chief saying, we are not going to work for the Israelis.

Now, there was a period about a month in after October the seventh, where Hamas were really quite concerned that they would lose the population, and that was a bad period for them. However, they should have had absolutely no concerns for that, because Israel went out of its way to make this a war against all Palestinians living in Gaza, whether they were Hamas, whether they were Fatah, whether [inaudible], whoever they were, this was a war of extermination. And the message got through very, very quickly.

So the level of public support for the resistance shot up and has maintained. There are reports of people saying “a plague on both your houses, we can’t bear this anymore”. And I’m not surprised by that, because every single Gazan family has been hit by this war. They’ve been moved not once or twice, but nine, 10 times. They have had all their money taken off them in Israeli roadblocks. This has happened to our journalists. They’ve been shot, they have been tortured, they have been raped. There’s a story of about 100 cases of rape that Al-Haq, the Palestinian human rights organization, has monitored, which Hamas has not registered for reasons of social conservative and shame, family shame. But the Israelis have used rape, exactly like the Russians have done, as an instrument of war, torture, [inaudible], arrest. They’ve stolen.

So this is absolutely a war against the whole people. And of course, the support for Hamas shot up and is still incredibly high.

So from Israel’s point of view, they cannot distinguish between Hamas and the normal population, which is why they claim that the Hamas losses are so high.

So the first attempt was to establish local governors, through direct appeals to the tribal chiefs that failed.

The second attempt was an attempt to infiltrate between [inaudible] mukhabarat who were placed there by Majed Faraj, Majed Faraj’s people, and they came there under the guise of being a protection to Egyptian aid convoys, and they were rumbled because they were armed. They drew their guns when the aid trucks were rushed by people and they were all captured. They tried to establish their headquarters in the headquarters of the Egyptian Red Crescent in Rafah, and they were all arrested. So that was the second attempt. Hamas dealt with that very quickly.

Now the situation is that I think Hamas are confident they have — they don’t say they’re over the worst, but, militarily, they are confident that — say they’ve gone through so much they’re not going to go back. Every time they’re asked by their more nervous colleagues in Doha or Beirut, can you keep on fighting? The answer is, yeah, no problem. Several months more, we can keep on doing it.

How can they keep on fighting?

Firstly, the tunnel network is much, much bigger than the Israelis thought, and much more advanced and much more sophisticated. It can run cars through it, for instance. They recently found a tunnel that was three levels deep, going under the Rafah border, another one running from north to south. So they’ve got literally thousands of kilometers of tunnels, and that is the main strategic weapon. It’s still intact. Hamas says about 20 to 30 percent of it has been rendered out of order, but they keep on digging. That’s the first thing.

The second thing is they’ve got a limitless supply of high quality explosive from the unexploded ordnance of Israeli missiles and bombs. They say they’ve got about 3,000 tons, which they recycle in their factories underground. So they’ve got communication north and south. They’ve got a limitless supply of explosives, and they’ve got also a limitless supply of manpower. Because as you can imagine what Palestinians would do when you’ve seen your families blown up, or you’ve seen the Israelis set the dogs on a guy with Down Syndrome and just left to bleed to death, that goes on in front of your eyes all the time. You can imagine what anyone, any brother or sister watching that would do.

Image
Israeli forces in Rafah in May. (Israeli Defence Forces Spokesperson’s Unit, Wikimedia Commons, Public domain)

And the third thing that they’ve demonstrated, more than anything else, is they’re not going to leave. They’d rather die in Gaza than go. This is a new generation of fighters. They’ve gone through, they were born after Oslo. They’ve gone through all the nonsense about, you know, tomorrow and tomorrow, tomorrow, you’ll see a Palestinian state. They’ve gone through the humiliation. They’ve gone through, you know, 16, 17 years of siege. They know that Israel is counting the number of calories and controlling the number of calories they consume, even in peace, and they say, what the hell we’ve had enough. This is the breakout generation.

So I view October the seventh, horrendous as it was, as a prison breakout, basically. And a lot of Palestinians support this. Really do. If you’re in the West Bank, where horrendous things have been happening, we can talk about that. But there’s a whole bunch of things have been happening under the cover of war. Basically, the settlers are trying to push the Palestinians into area A from area C, which is the part that is controlled by Israel, in fact, Israel controls everything.

Image
2017 map of the control status of the West Bank as per the Oslo Accords. Area A in green, Area B in red and Area C in pink. (SoWhAt249, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0)

And what the West Bankers say is, if it works in Gaza, we’ll be next. So you’ve got this absolutely, you know, if anyone is facing an existential war, we use the word existential a little bit too much about the Jews and being Jewish myself, I’m fed up with it. I think the people facing a real existential crisis are the Palestinians, and they’re standing up to it, and they’re behaving like real warriors.

Chris Hedges: Where do you see… I have a hard time figuring out how this is going to end. I mean, it’s clear what Israel’s intent is. It wants to depopulate Gaza and make Gaza uninhabitable, but I don’t see it. And it can keep going as long as the United States keeps funneling weapons. I think I read, 68 percent of munitions that Israel uses now come from the United States, and I don’t see that ending. So how do you see this, you know, playing out?

David Hearst: Well, Israel’s got a very big problem, and that is, it’s going back and back and back in the same areas to destroy Khan Younis again, for the second, third time. It’ll destroy Rafah again. It’ll go back to Gaza City again. It will not be able to pacify Gaza. So this will be, even if it is low level, it will carry on.

They’ve got a real problem trying to work out who’s going to run the place and how it’s going to get run. There are rival projects at the moment. I don’t think any of them will take off. Basically, there’s a sort of U.S. sponsored plan with the UAE and possibly also with Dahlan, Mohammed Dahlan, who is mentioned as a possible figure that could be acceptable to Hamas, that also has the whole backstory to it, which we could talk about. But even if you take, for instance, UAE, there’s a recent suggestion that the Emiratis would put ground troops in, there are conditions that the Emiratis would set for saying that they would put their troops on the ground.

(Much more at link.)

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/08/19/t ... -slipping/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 21, 2024 11:14 am

Chris Hedges: Thou Shalt Not Commit Genocide
August 20, 2024

Genocide, the internationally recognized crime of crimes, is not a policy issue. It cannot be equated with trade deals, infrastructure bills, charter schools or immigration. It is a moral issue.

Image
Flesh and Blood – by Mr. Fish.

By Chris Hedges
ScheerPost

There is only one way to end the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

It is not through bilateral negotiations. Israel has amply demonstrated, including with the assassination of the lead Hamas negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, that it has no interest in a permanent ceasefire.

The only way for Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians to be halted is for the U.S. to end all weapons shipments to Israel.

And the only way this will take place is if enough Americans make clear they have no intention of supporting any presidential ticket or any political party that fuels this genocide.

The arguments against a boycott of the two ruling parties are familiar: It will ensure the election of Donald Trump. Kamala Harris has rhetorically shown more compassion than Joe Biden.

There are not enough of us to have an impact. We can work within the Democratic Party. The Israel lobby, especially the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which owns most members of Congress, is too powerful. Negotiations will eventually achieve a cessation of the slaughter.

In short, we are impotent and must surrender our agency to sustain a project of mass killing. We must accept as normal governance the shipment of hundreds of millions of dollars in military aid to an apartheid state, the use of vetoes at the U.N. Security Council to protect Israel and the active obstruction of international efforts to end mass murder.

We have no choice.

Genocide, the internationally recognized crime of crimes, is not a policy issue. It cannot be equated with trade deals, infrastructure bills, charter schools or immigration. It is a moral issue.

It is about the eradication of a people. Any surrender to genocide condemns us as a nation and as a species. It plunges the global society one step closer to barbarity.

It eviscerates the rule of law and mocks every fundamental value we claim to honor. It is in a category by itself. And to not, with every fiber of our being, combat genocide is to be complicit in what Hannah Arendt defines as “radical evil,” the evil where human beings, as human beings, are rendered superfluous.

Image
Primo Levi in the 1950s. (Mondadori Publishers, Wikimedia Commons, Public domain)

The plethora of Holocaust studies should have made this indelible point. But Holocaust studies were hijacked by Zionists.

They insist that the Holocaust is unique, that it is somehow set apart from human nature and human history. Jews are deified as eternal victims of anti-Semitism.

Nazis are endowed with a special kind of inhumanity. Israel, as the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington concludes, is the solution.

The Holocaust was one of several genocides carried out in the 19th and 20th centuries. But historical context is ignored and with it our understanding of the dynamics of mass extermination.

The fundamental lesson of the Holocaust, which writers such as Primo Levi stress, is that we can all become willing executioners. It takes very little. We can all become complicit, if only through indifference and apathy, in evil.

“Monsters exist,” Levi, who survived Auschwitz, writes,

“but they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the common men, the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions.”


To confront evil — even if there is no chance of success — keeps alive our humanity and dignity.

It allows us, as Vaclav Havel writes in The Power of the Powerless, to live in truth, a truth the powerful do not want spoken and seek to suppress. It provides a guiding light to those who come after us. It tells the victims they are not alone.

It is “humanity’s revolt against an enforced position” and an “attempt to regain control over one’s sense of responsibility.”

Image
New York City Democratic Socialists of America and Jewish Voice for Peace lead march for Gaza ceasefire an end to Israeli apartheid on Oct. 20, 2023. (4kbw9Df3Tw, Wikimedia Commons, CC0)

What does it say about us if we accept a world where we arm and fund a nation that kills and wounds hundreds of innocents a day?

What does it say about us if we support an orchestrated famine and the poisoning of the water supply where the polio virus has been detected, meaning tens of thousands will get sick and many will die?

What does it say about us if we permit for 10 months the bombing of refugee camps, hospitals, villages and cities to wipe out families and force survivors to camp out in the open or find shelter in crude tents?

What does it say about us when we accept the murder of 16,456 children, although this is surely an undercount?

What does it say about us when we watch Israel escalate attacks on United Nations facilities, schools — including the Al-Tabaeen school in Gaza City, where over 100 Palestinians were killed while performing the Fajr, or dawn prayers — and other emergency shelters?

What does it say about us when we permit Israel to use Palestinians as human shields by forcing handcuffed civilians, including children and the elderly, to enter potentially booby-trapped tunnels and buildings in advance of Israeli troops, at times dressed in Israeli military uniforms?

What does it say about us when we support politicians and soldiers who defend the rape and torture of prisoners?

Are these the kinds of allies we want to empower? Is this behavior we want to embrace? What message does this send to the rest of the world?

If we do not hold fast to moral imperatives, we are doomed. Evil will triumph. It means there is no right and wrong. It means anything, including mass murder, is permissible.

Protestors outside the Democratic National Convention at the United Center in Chicago demand an end to the genocide and U.S. aid to Israel, but inside we are fed a sickening conformity. Hope lies in the streets.

A moral stance always has a cost. If there is no cost, it is not moral. It is merely conventional belief.

Image
Daniel Berrigan, at right, demonstrates outside a church against the Vietnam War. (Felton Davis/Flickr, CC BY 2.0)

“But what of the price of peace?” the radical Catholic priest Daniel Berrigan, who was sent to federal prison for burning draft records during the war in Vietnam, asks in his book No Bars to Manhood:

“I think of the good, decent, peace-loving people I have known by the thousands, and I wonder. How many of them are so afflicted with the wasting disease of normalcy that, even as they declare for the peace, their hands reach out with an instinctive spasm in the direction of their comforts, their home, their security, their income, their future, their plans — that five-year plan of studies, that ten-year plan of professional status, that twenty-year plan of family growth and unity, that fifty-year plan of decent life and honorable natural demise.

‘Of course, let us have the peace,’ we cry, ‘but at the same time let us have normalcy, let us lose nothing, let our lives stand intact, let us know neither prison nor ill repute nor disruption of ties.’ And because we must encompass this and protect that, and because at all costs — at all costs — our hopes must march on schedule, and because it is unheard of that in the name of peace a sword should fall, disjoining that fine and cunning web that our lives have woven, because it is unheard of that good men should suffer injustice or families be sundered or good repute be lost — because of this we cry peace and cry peace, and there is no peace.

There is no peace because there are no peacemakers. There are no makers of peace because the making of peace is at least as costly as the making of war — at least as exigent, at least as disruptive, at least as liable to bring disgrace and prison and death in its wake.”


The question is not whether resistance is practical. It is whether resistance is right.

We are enjoined to love our neighbor, not our tribe.

We must have faith that the good draws to it the good, even if the empirical evidence around us is bleak. The good is always embodied in action. It must be seen. It does not matter if the wider society is censorious.

We are called to defy — through acts of civil disobedience and noncompliance — the laws of the state, when these laws, as they often do, conflict with moral law. We must stand, no matter the cost, with the crucified of the earth.

If we fail to take this stand, whether against the abuses of militarized police, the inhumanity of our vast prison system or the genocide in Gaza, we become the crucifiers.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/08/20/c ... -genocide/

******

Palestinian bombing attacks return amid uncertainty in ceasefire talks

While the United States is attempting to force the Palestinian people to accept a compromising unguaranteed ceasefire and prisoner swap deal, the Palestinian resistance has threatened to re-activate bombing attacks inside Israel as a tactic

August 19, 2024 by Aseel Saleh

Image
A wall in Nablus' old city with images of the city's martyred resistance fighters. Photo: Aseel Saleh

After almost one decade of their suspension, Palestinian bombing attacks (referred to by Western media as suicide attacks) have returned. An explosion took place in the Israeli city of Tel Aviv on Sunday August 18 and resulted in the death of the perpetrator, and a moderate injury sustained by an Israeli passerby.

While Israeli police and the Israeli Security Agency (also known as Shin Bet) announced on Sunday that it was difficult to identify the perpetrator, and that investigations were still underway to unveil the background of the incident, the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack on Monday, August 19.

“The martyrdom operations will return to the forefront as long as the massacres, forced displacements of Palestinian civilians, and targeted assassinations by the occupation continue,” Hamas’s military wing Al-Qassam brigades said in a statement.

Although the bombing has not left casualties other than the perpetrator, the incident is considered a critical development and a serious escalation with regard to the current multi-front war that may further ignite a regional war. Such incidents have taken place during crucial turning points within the Palestinian lengthy struggle against the Israeli occupation between 1990’s and 2000s.

Media reports indicated that the perpetrator is believed to be from Nablus city in the West Bank. This means that he managed to breach all of Israel’s tightened security measures including the 708 kilometer apartheid wall, which segregates the territories occupied by Israel in 1948 from those it occupied in 1967, before he arrived in Tel Aviv to carry out the attack.

The incident also comes at a very critical time, during which Israel and its sponsor the United States are putting tremendous pressure on Hamas to accept a ceasefire and prisoner swap deal tailored to the interests of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which neglects several key demands of the resistance groups to achieve minimum conditions for the Palestinian people to live in peace, dignity and liberty.

During a meeting with Netanyahu in Tel Aviv on Monday, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken described the ongoing negotiations as “maybe the last chance to secure Israeli captives’ release and a Gaza ceasefire”.

“In a very constructive meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu today, he confirmed to me that Israel accepts the bridging proposal, that he supports it. It is now incumbent on Hamas to do the same,” Blinken said speaking to media outlets.

Although Israel has been lavished with uninterrupted support from the US, the security and stability of the Zionist entity has been subjected to an unprecedented threat by the Axis of Resistance, namely Iran and Hezbollah with imminent large-scale attacks to be launched against it.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/08/19/ ... ire-talks/

******

Image
An Israeli soldier operates in the Gaza Strip with a dog from the army’s canine unit in January, 2024. (Photo: IDF Spokesperson’s Unit)

In Gaza, Israel’s dehumanization of the Palestinians has reached a new height
Originally published: In Gaza, Israel's dehumanization of the Palestinians has reached a new height on August 14, 2024 by Gideon Levy (more by In Gaza, Israel's dehumanization of the Palestinians has reached a new height) (Posted Aug 20, 2024)

The Israel Defense Forces has decided to downsize the Oketz unit, Unit 7142, ahead of its cancellation. The unit for dogs and their trainers has been suffering from a shortage recently. Quite a number of dogs have been killed in the Gaza Strip, and it was therefore decided to use cheaper, more efficient means. It turns out that the new unit, which has yet to be given a name by the IDF computer, brings the same operational results. There’s no need to train dogs for months, no need for the iron muzzles that shut their frightening jaws, and their food will be cheaper,pp too: Instead of expensive Bonzo dog food, leftovers from battle rations.

And the money for burial and commemoration will also be canceled: The Oketz dogs were generally given ceremonial military burials, with weeping soldiers and tear-jerking articles on the first page of the IDF newsletter Yedioth Ahronoth. The replacements have no need for burials, their bodies can simply be tossed out. The annual August 30 memorial ceremonies for the dogs can also be dispensed with. The new dogs will have no monument. The sensitive souls of the soldiers who handle them will no longer be damaged when they die.

The pilot project is now in process and there’s already one dead in the new unit. Soon, the IDF will export the knowledge it has acquired to other armies worldwide. In Ukraine, Sudan, Yemen and maybe even in Niger, they’ll be happy to rely on it.

According to the Oketz Wikipedia page: “The unit activates unique war materiel—the dog, which provides unique operational advantages that have no human or technological substitute.” Oops, a mistake. There may be no technological substitute, but a human substitute has been found. “Human” is an exaggeration of course, but the IDF has a new type of dog, cheap, obedient, and far better trained, whose lives are worth less.

The IDF’s new dogs are the residents of the Gaza Strip. Not all of them of course, only those that the army scout chooses carefully, out of 2 million candidates; the auditions take place in the displaced persons camps. There is no age restriction.

The army’s headhunters have already found children and elderly people, and there are no restrictions on the activation of the new manpower. They use them and then toss them out. Meanwhile they haven’t been trained for attack missions and for identifying explosives by smell, but the army is working on that. At least they won’t bite Palestinian children in their sleep like the previous Baskerville hounds.

On Tuesday, Haaretz published a photo of one of the new dogs on the first page: a young resident of Gaza in handcuffs, dressed in rags that were once uniforms, his eyes covered with a rag, his gaze downcast, armed soldiers standing next to him. Yaniv Kubovich, the most courageous military correspondent in Israel, and Michael Hauser Tov revealed that the IDF uses Palestinian civilians to check tunnels in Gaza. “Our lives are more important than their lives,” the commanders told the soldiers, repeating what is self-evident.

These new “dogs” are sent to the tunnels in handcuffs. Cameras are attached to their bodies, and from them one can hear the sound of their frightened breathing.

They “cleanse” shafts, are held in worse conditions than Oketz dogs and their activity has become widespread, systematic. Al-Jazeera, boycotted in Israel for causing “damage to security,” revealed the phenomenon. The military denied it, as usual, with its lies. Two Haaretz reporters brought the full story on Tuesday, and it’s terrifying.

There were soldiers who protested at the sight of the new “dogs,” several brave ones even gave testimony to Breaking the Silence. But the procedure, which was once specifically forbidden by the High Court of Justice, has been adopted on a broad scope in the army. The next time that the public protests the fact that Benjamin Netanyahu ignores High Court rulings, we should remember that the army also brazenly ignores its rulings.

The process of dehumanization of the Palestinians has reached a new height. Haaretz reported that the IDF senior command knows about the new unit. In the opinion of the army, a dog’s life is worth more than a Palestinian’s. Now we also have the official version.

https://mronline.org/2024/08/20/in-gaza ... ew-height/

Were someone to nuke Tel Aviv I wouldn't shed a tear.

******

Revisionist Zionists dare the U.S. to pull the plug on their Nakba agenda

Alastair Crooke

August 19, 2024

America is trapped. The power-brokers are unhappy, but impotent.

Israelis have been deeply divided these last years, unable to coalesce around a government. After five general elections, they decided to dismiss the Lapid/Gantz team and to put a new coalition – formed around Netanyahu and small Jewish supremacist parties – into power.

However, soon after the formation of the new government, there occurred an severe outbreak of ‘buyers’ remorse’, with a substantial segment of Israelis seemingly ready to contemplate almost anything to oust their government.

Demonstrations have occurred regularly throughout Israel to prevent the country from becoming – in the words of one former Mossad director, “a racist and violent state that cannot survive”.

But it is probably already too late.

Most people outside Israel tend to lump together different, and often opposing views in Israel, solely through the reductive perspective of seeing all these diverse actors as being Jews and Zionists of slightly differing hues.

They couldn’t be more wrong. There is an existential divide; there are diverse forms of Zionism: The divisions go to the very meaning of what it means to be a Jew. Benjamin Netanyahu is a ‘revisionist Zionist’ i.e. a follower of Vladimir Jabotinsky (for whom his father Benzion Netanyahu served as private secretary): ‘Revisionist Zionism’ is the polar opposite to the cultural Zionism of the World Jewish Congress.

As a young man, Netanyahu professed that Palestine is “a land without a people for a people without a land”. He was consequently in favour of expelling all Arab ‘blow-ins’ (as he saw them). Furthermore, he advocated the idea that the State of Israel extends “from the Nile to the Euphrates”.

However, during his 16 years as prime minister, Netanyahu was perceived as having moderated (become more pragmatic), but still devious. With hindsight, maybe he simply adapted to the times. Or possibly, he was practicing Straussian ‘double-truth’ – the practice which Leo Strauss taught his followers as the only means of preserving ‘true’ Judaism within the encompassing ‘liberal-European’ (largely Ashkenazi) ethos. Strauss’ ‘esoterism’ (drawn from Maimonides, the early Jewish mystic), was one of outwardly professing a ‘worldly thing’, whilst inwardly preserving a completely contrasting esoteric reading of the world.

Just to be clear: Revisionist Zionists (of which Netanyahu is one), include Menachem Begin and Ariel Sharon who demonstrated that of which they were capable with the Nakba (the mass expulsion of Palestinians) in 1948.

Netanyahu is of this ‘line’ – and so is a key dominant faction in Washington.

The ‘war’ with Washington, post-7 Oct

At first, Washington reacted with unreflective and immediate support for Israel, vetoing various UNSC ceasefire resolutions and fully provisioning Israel’s military needs for the destruction of the Palestinian enclave in Gaza. It was unthinkable in the U.S.’ Establishment eyes, to do anything other than support Israel. Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge (QME) is enshrined as being one of the foundational structures supporting the brittle branch on which U.S. hegemony rests.

Ordinary Americans (and some in the Administration) however, were watching the horrors of genocide ‘live’ on their cell phones. The Democratic Party started to fracture badly. The ‘power-brokers’ in the backroom began to put pressure on the Israeli war cabinet to negotiate the release of the hostages and conclude a ceasefire in Gaza – hoping for a return to the status quo ante.

But Netanyahu’s government – in various tautological ways – said ‘no’, unashamedly playing on the 7 October trauma of its citizens, to assert the need to destroy Hamas.

Washington somewhat belatedly came to understand that 7 October was now the pretext for Jabotinsky’s followers to do what they had always wanted to do: To expel the Palestinians from Palestine.

The Israeli message was perfectly ‘received and understood’ by Washington’s ruling strata: The Revisionist Zionists (who represent about 2 million Israelis) intended cynically to impose their will on the Anglo-Saxons; to threaten them with igniting war with the world, in which the U.S. would ‘burn’: They would not hesitate to plunge the U.S. into a wide regional war, should the White House try to undercut the neo-Nakba project.

In spite of the absolute support Israel has across Washington, it seems that the ruling class decided that the ‘Revisionist stratagem’ ultimatum could not be tolerated. A crucial U.S. election was in train. U.S. soft power around the World was collapsing. Anyone around the globe watching events unfold understood that killing 40,000+ innocent people had nothing to do with eliminating Hamas.

Understanding the Background

To understand the nature of this occult war between the Revisionist Zionists and Washington, it is necessary to revisit Leo Strauss, a German Jew, who had left Germany in 1932 under the auspices of a Rockefeller Foundation grant, finally to arrive in the U.S. in 1938.

The point here is that the ideas at play in this ideological struggle are not just about Israelis and Palestinians. They are about control and power. The essence of the present Israeli government’s agenda – particularly its controversial Legal Reform – are pure Leo Strauss derivatives.

The concern amongst U.S. rulers was that Netanyahu’s agenda was becoming an exercise in pure Straussian power – at the expense of secular American power.

That is to say that the Revisionist notions are shared by the influential group of Americans that formed about this Professor of Philosophy – Leo Strauss – at the University of Chicago. Many accounts report that he had formed a small inner group of faithful Jewish students to whom he gave private oral instruction: The esoteric inner meaning to politics was centred, hearsay recounts, on asserting political hegemony as the means to guard against a new Shoah (holocaust).

The core of Strauss’s thought – the theme to which he would return time and again – is what he called the curious polarity between Jerusalem and Athens. What did these two names signify? On the surface, it would seem that Jerusalem and Athens represent two fundamentally different, even antagonistic, codes or ways of life.

The Bible, Strauss held, presents itself not as a philosophy or a science, but as a code of law; an unchangeable divine law mandating how we should live. In fact, the first five books of the Bible are known in the Jewish tradition as the Torah and ‘Torah’ is perhaps most literally translated as ‘Law’. The attitude taught by the Bible is not one of self-reflection or critical examination – but of absolute obedience, faith, and trust in Revelation. If the paradigmatic Athenian is Socrates, the paradigmatic biblical figure is Abraham and the Akedah (the binding of Isaac), who is prepared to sacrifice his son for an unintelligible divine command.

‘Yes’ western liberal democracy brought civil equality, tolerance, and the end to the worst forms of persecution. Yet at the same time, liberalism required of Judaism – as it does of all faiths – to undergo the privatization of belief, the transformation of Jewish law from a communal authority to the precincts of individual conscience. The result, as Strauss analysed it, was a mixed blessing.

The liberal principle of the separation of state and society, of public life and private belief, could not but result in the “Protestantisation” of Judaism, he suggested.

To be clear: these two antagonistic ways of being express fundamentally different moral and political points of view. This is the essence of what divides the two ‘camps’ that inhabit Israel today: Democratic ‘cultural Judaism’ versus the Judaism of faith and obedience to divine Revelation.

Setting the Trap for the U.S.

The U.S. Straussians began forming a political group half a century ago, in 1972. They were all members of Democratic Senator Henry “Scoop” Jackson’s staff, and included Elliott Abrams, Richard Perle and David Wurmser. In 1996, this Straussians trio wrote a study for the new Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. This report (the Clean Break Strategy) advocated the elimination of Yasser Arafat; the annexation of the Palestinian territories; a war against Iraq and the transfer of Palestinians there. Netanyahu was very much a member of this circle.

The Strategy was inspired not only by the political theories of Leo Strauss, but also by those of his friend, Ze’ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism, to whom Netanyahu’s father served as private secretary.

For the avoidance of confusion, the American Straussians – today usually called ‘neo-cons’ – are not in principle opposed to the Netanyahu government’s Nakba agenda. It was not Gazans suffering that exercised them; rather, it was the threats by the Revisionist Zionists to launch an attack on Iran and on Lebanon. For, were this war to be launched, the Israeli army – for certain – would not be able to defeat Hezbollah on its own. And for Israel to wage war on Iran would amount to certifiable madness.

Thus to save Israel, the U.S. undoubtedly would be forced to intervene. The balance of military power has shifted considerably towards both Hizbullah and Iran since the Israeli-Lebanese war of 2006 and any war now would be a fraught and risky undertaking.

Yet – this was of the essence to the Israeli government’s unspoken ‘esoteric’ (inner) agenda.

Washington tries to Push Back, but finds itself Check-Mated

The only alternative for the U.S. would be to encourage a military coup in Tel Aviv. Already, some senior officers and non-commissioned Israeli officers have come together to suggest this. In March 2024, General Benny Gantz was invited to Washington (against the wishes of the PM). He did not, however, accept the invitation to overthrow the Prime Minister. He went to make sure that he could still save Israel, and that his allies in the U.S. would not turn against the Israeli military cadre.

This may seem odd. But the reality is that the IDF feels undermined, even betrayed. The agreement struck at the outset of the government between Netanyahu and Itamar Ben-Gvir (of Otzma Yehudit) – was the outlier to this anxiety.

The governmental accord provided for Ben-Gvir to head an autonomous armed force in the West Bank. He was given charge not only of the national police, but also the border police, which until then, had been the responsibility of the Ministry of Defence.

The accord also provided for the creation of a large-scale National Guard and a reinforced presence of reserve troops within the border police.

Ben-Gvir is a Kahanist, meaning a disciple of Rabbi Meir Kahane, who demands the expulsion of Palestinian Arab citizens from Israel and the Occupied Territories and the establishment of a theocracy, and he makes little secret of wanting to use the border police to expel the Palestinian populations, be they Muslim or Christian.

Ben Gvir’s official forces represent, as Benny Gantz noted, a ‘private army’. But that is the half of it – for he separately holds the allegiance of hundreds of thousand West Bank settler-vigilantes over whom the radical Rabbi, Dov Lior and his coterie of radical Jabotinsky Rabbi influencers, have control.

The regular army fears these vigilantes – as we saw at Sde Teiman military base – when Ben Gvir’s militia vigilantes stormed the base, to protect soldiers accused of raping Palestinian prisoners.

The anxiety of the Israeli military echelon at the reality of this ‘Jabotinsky army’ is evidenced by former PM Ehud Barak’s warning that:

“Under cover of the war, a governmental and constitutional putsch is now taking place in Israel without a shot being fired. If this putsch isn’t stopped, it will turn Israel into a de facto dictatorship within weeks. Netanyahu and his government are assassinating democracy … The only way to prevent a dictatorship at such a late stage is by shutting down the country through large-scale, nonviolent civil disobedience, 24/7, until this government falls … Israel has never faced such a serious and immediate internal threat to its existence and future as a free society”.

The IDF élite want a ceasefire/hostage deal, primarily to ‘stop Ben-Gvir’ – not because it resolves Israel’s Palestinian issue. It doesn’t.

But Netanyahu’s ultimatum is that if the Haniyeh assassination isn’t sufficient to plunge the U.S. into the Big War that will give him (Netanyahu) the Great Victory, he can always trigger a bigger provocation: Ben Gvir also controls the Temple Mount security – there is always the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa escalatory ladder available for climbing (through threatening the destruction of Al-Aqsa Mosque).

America is trapped. The power-brokers are unhappy, but impotent.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... ba-agenda/

******

Imad-4: Hezbollah’s ‘dig’ at Israeli propaganda

The revelation of Hezbollah’s underground missile facility not only debunks Israeli claims of weapons being stored among civilians but also forces Tel Aviv to recognize that Hezbollah’s strategic capabilities are far more sophisticated than previously understood.


Khalil Nasrallah

AUG 19, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

Hezbollah’s decision last week to release a video of its vast underground network of tunnels is not one to be taken lightly. While the organization has previously showcased some of its capabilities, this marks the first unveiling of its strategic facility, “Imad-4.” Named after the late Hezbollah Military Commander Imad Mughniyeh, it houses a fraction of the Lebanese resistance movement’s advanced missile arsenal.

The revelation carries significant messages, not only to the current regional war centered on Gaza but also referencing events spanning at least two and a half decades. Hezbollah’s messages are closely connected with the Syrian conflict and Israel’s long-term efforts to prevent Lebanon from acquiring weapons that could shift the balance of power, including those sophisticated missile systems now being manufactured within Lebanon.

But one of the most critical aims of this disclosure is a full-frontal challenge to Israel’s false narrative that Hezbollah stores its weapons, particularly rockets, among civilian populations.

It is a groundless claim heavily promoted by Tel Aviv’s propaganda apparatus and echoed by Hezbollah opponents within Lebanon. For security reasons, Hezbollah has traditionally refrained from commenting on this matter.

Countering Israeli propaganda

The unveiling of the Imad-4 missile facility represents a hefty blow to an Israeli media narrative that seeks to portray Hezbollah as a military force that hides behind civilians, storing its weapons in homes, schools, residential complexes, and other civilian infrastructure.

That narrative has been a cornerstone of Tel Aviv’s anti-resistance rhetoric, not only in Israeli circles but also among Arab, Lebanese, and international media.

The examples are rife. On 12 July 2016, during a UN Security Council session on Resolution 1701, Israeli envoy Danny Danon presented an aerial photograph of the village of Shaqra in southern Lebanon, claiming that Hezbollah had turned the village into a stronghold and that “one out of three buildings used for terror activities, including rocket launchers and arms depots.”

“Hezbollah has placed these positions next to schools and other public institutions putting innocent civilians in great danger,” he charged.

In another instance, on 6 December 2018, Israeli army spokesman Avichai Adraee posted on X, accompanied by a propaganda video, repeating the false claim that one out of every three houses in southern Lebanon is a Hezbollah site:

Residents of Lebanon: this is the hidden truth. One in every three homes in the south is a Hezbollah site. This is what is happening in Kafr Kila and most of the Shia villages in south Lebanon. This is how Hezbollah has turned southern Lebanon into a terrorist stronghold under the noses of the Lebanese government.

Adraee made similar accusations on 14 July 2021, when he charged Hezbollah with establishing a military warehouse near a school in the town of Aba in southern Lebanon. He noted that this warehouse was one of thousands of targets in the possession of Israel’s Northern Command, which would be targeted in any upcoming confrontation.

Multi-front media assault

But these Israeli fabrications have been widely amplified by western media, with some publishing Israeli talking points – such as Rafic Hariri International Airport being a hub for smuggling missiles or other alleged ‘facilities’ within and around Beirut’s southern suburbs.

For many years, Arab media outlets have launched comparable campaigns, aiming to sway Lebanese public opinion against Hezbollah and leveraging these narratives in the country’s sectarian political dynamics.

In some instances, such as the incident in Ain Qana on 22 September 2020, Arab and Lebanese media initially reported an explosion as a Hezbollah weapons depot inside of a house. However, it was later revealed to be a site for collecting remnants of shells and mines.

In another incident, days later, on 29 September, Hezbollah organized a media tour in the Ouzai area to refute claims by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that it was a missile and weapons factory.

These events followed the national tragedy of the Beirut port explosion the preceding month, which Hezbollah’s enemies and political rivals were keen to exploit. Hezbollah faced grave accusations, like storing “ammonium nitrate” at the port, which the movement vehemently denied.

However, the showcasing of Imad-4 decisively counters these narratives, whether from Israel or other media outlets, by demonstrating that its missile arsenal and weapon storage facilities are located far from civilian and residential areas.

Strategic timing and tactical pressure

While its exact location remains secret, the timing of Imad-4’s disclosure is linked to several immediate concerns, given the heightened tensions in the region. It comes in the wake of Israel’s twin assassinations of Hezbollah war commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut and Hamas political bureau leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran.

The move also aims to thwart any potential Israeli “pre-emptive strike” against civilian areas, which Tel Aviv will try to spin as “missile facilities.” It is also intended to disrupt Israeli calculations, which could lead to miscalculations in response to any future actions by the resistance. Furthermore, Imad-4 demonstrates Hezbollah’s readiness for confrontation should Israel decide to escalate the conflict further.

As Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah has hinted at in past speeches, the organization’s missile arsenal is being positioned in a fortified and secret manner. The reveal also adds pressure to ongoing Gaza ceasefire negotiations in Doha, intended to strengthen the hand of Palestinian negotiators.

For more than two decades, the Lebanese resistance has been constructing missile facilities in complete secrecy. Israel has expended considerable intelligence resources trying to locate these facilities to plan for any potential conflict.

Despite the challenges posed by the Syrian war, Hezbollah managed to transfer advanced weapons to Lebanon, where they are presently manufactured and developed, including missile systems and drones.

Thickening the fog of war

Hezbollah’s revelation of the Imad-4 facility undoubtedly forces Israeli decision-makers to reconsider their strategies, particularly within the security establishment. The questions raised go beyond mere confrontation with Lebanon or the decision to escalate into full-scale war; they touch on broader regional dynamics.

The strategic preparations Hezbollah has made in Lebanon are just one piece of a larger puzzle. The Syrian arena, too, plays a critical role in the Axis of Resistance’s strategy, where missile facilities have been built over years of conflict and even prior.

One of the primary objectives of Israel’s so-called “battle between wars” in Syria was to prevent the Syrian army from regaining its strategic missile capabilities and to disrupt Iran’s and its allies’ efforts to build war infrastructure designed to be used against Israel in the event of the Unity of Fronts strategy being implemented.

In short, the Imad-4 revelation compels the occupation state to reconsider its decision on whether to engage in a full-scale war with Lebanon. Hezbollah has shown that it can effectively operate under the radar, outmaneuvering Israeli intelligence despite organizational and operational setbacks due to targeted killings or strikes.

This media-savvy move changes the strategic calculus, leaving Israel with difficult questions about the true extent of Hezbollah’s capabilities and the effectiveness of its own intelligence-gathering operations.

Additionally, it demonstrates the importance of cognitive warfare – a potent but often underestimated tool in Hezbollah and the broader Resistance Axis’s arsenal.

https://thecradle.co/articles/imad-4-he ... propaganda

Hamas, PIJ take credit for Tel Aviv explosion

The Palestinian resistance movements promised that 'martyrdom operations' against Israel will return as long as Israel's atrocities in Gaza continue

News Desk

AUG 19, 2024

Image
The scene of an explosion in a vehicle in Tel Aviv that killed one person on August 18, 2024 (Photo credit: Magen David Adom)

The armed wings of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), the Qassam Brigades and Quds Brigades, have taken credit for an explosion that occurred Sunday evening in Tel Aviv, killing the man carrying the explosives and injuring a passerby.

The Qassam Brigades, the Hamas armed wing, announced on its Telegram channel on 19 August “the implementation of the martyrdom operation that took place yesterday evening Sunday in the city of Tel Aviv. And the Kataib confirms that the martyrdom operations in the occupied interior will return to the fore as long as the occupation's executions and civilian displacement operations continue and the policy of assassinations continues.”


“Police and Shin Bet [Israel Security Agency] confirmed on Monday that the Sunday night explosion in Tel Aviv was a terrorist attack carried out via a powerful explosive device,” The Jerusalem Post reported.

The police and Shin Bet further added that the alertness levels had been raised throughout Gush Dan, and searches were being carried out in the area.

Israeli state television Kan reported that the suspect, who was “carrying an explosive device,” is believed to be from the occupied West Bank town of Nablus.

Sub-Commissioner Haim Bobalil, commander of the Ayalon area of ​​the Tel Aviv District Police, told Kan, “It is possible that the assailant planned to reach the nearby synagogue or perhaps the shopping center. We have no ability to understand why it exploded at this point in time.”

“The scene here speaks for itself. It is a powerful charge that could have caused significant damage. We are in a kind of miracle that the incident did not end in dozens of deaths,” Bobalil added.

Hamas has not carried out such bombing attacks since 2016, when 19-year-old Abdul Hamid Abu Srour, from near the West Bank town of Bethlehem, detonated an explosive device on a bus in occupied Jerusalem. The explosion killed Abu Srour and injured 20 Israelis.

In Tel Aviv specifically, however, such an operation has not been carried out since 2006, when the Palestinian Islamic Jihad carried out the first and second 'Rosh Ha'ir restaurant bombings' on 19 January and 17 April of that year. During the second operation, 11 Israelis were killed, and 70 were injured.

Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Al-Arabi TV on 19 August that “the Palestinian resistance launched a new model through the Tel Aviv operation" while discussing new modes of confrontation in dealing with Israel's intransigence over reaching a ceasefire deal in Gaza.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-pij ... -explosion

Israeli attack on Yemen’s Hodeidah port ‘potential war crime’: HRW
The Israeli strike on Hodeidah last month killed six Yemenis and injured over 80 at a civilian port

News Desk

AUG 19, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

[Human Rights Watch (HRW) said on 19 August that the Israeli attack on Yemen’s Hodeidah port last month could be considered a war crime.

“The Israeli airstrikes on Yemen’s Hodeidah port on the evening of July 20, 2024, were an apparently unlawful indiscriminate or disproportionate attack on civilians that could have a long-term impact on millions of Yemenis who rely on the port for food and humanitarian aid,” HRW said.

“The Israeli airstrikes, which killed at least six civilians and reportedly injured at least 80 others, hit more than two dozen oil storage tanks and two shipping cranes in Hodeidah port in northwest Yemen, as well as a power plant in Hodeidah’s Salif district,” it added. The strikes “appeared to cause disproportionate harm to civilians and civilian objects. Serious violations of the laws of war committed willfully, that is deliberately or recklessly, are war crimes.”

HRW also said the Ansarallah resistance movement’s drone operation in Tel Aviv, which killed one Israeli and wounded others, also “may amount to a war crime.”

The HRW report says the organization interviewed eleven people about the attack on Hodeidah, including an Ansarallah official in the Yemeni Sanaa government’s oil industry – which runs the port targeted by Israel.

Israel “damaged or destroyed at least 29 of the 41 oil storage tanks at Hodeidah port, as well as the only two cranes used for loading and unloading supplies from ships,” HRW added. The main power plant in Hodeidah was also struck.

Thousands of civilians are employed at Hodeidah port, and dozens were there when the strikes happened, the Yemeni oil industry official interviewed by HRW said.

The Hodeidah attack was a response to the unprecedented Yemeni drone strike on Tel Aviv on 19 July, carried out by the Armed Forces of Yemen’s Sanaa government, which is merged with Ansarallah.

The attack killed six people and injured over 80, most of whom suffered from severe burns. Fires were raging for days after the Israeli strikes.

Israel’s escalation against Yemen came just 10 days before the Israeli strikes on Beirut and Tehran, which killed top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr and Hamas political bureau chief Ismail Haniyeh.

The strike that assassinated Shukr in Beirut also killed several civilians, including children.

Hezbollah, the Islamic Republic, and Ansarallah have all vowed retaliation, leaving Israel and its allies on high alert.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... -crime-hrw
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 22, 2024 11:10 am

Sanitized NGOs: The Occupation’s Latest Gambit to Control Gaza
August 20, 2024

Image
A US doctor treats a child at the European General Hospital in Khan Younis, Gaza. Photo: Usman Shah/Dawn.


By Yousef Fares – Aug 20, 2024

The Israeli occupation army is desperately trying to create an alternative to Hamas governing the Gaza Strip after the end of the war. Many of its proposed alternatives have been rejected by multiple different parties that the occupation thought it could rely on to fulfill this role. The leaders of the clans in Gaza rejected a proposal to divvy up the region between them, in a manner similar to the “Sunni Awakening Movement” that had been sponsored by the US military in Iraq. The occupation’s proposals were also rejected by Hamas’ political opponents, the two Fatah factions, one which is loyal to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, and the other UAE-funded “Democratic Reform Current” led by Mohammed Dahlan. Both seem to believe that accepting any authority at this moment, according to enemy conditions, is equivalent to seizing power from atop an Israeli tank.

Faced with these realities, the occupation has recently resorted to amplifying the role of international institutions and “clean” civil society organizations (NGO’s)—sanitized of political or nationalist content—by expanding their authority to perform civil, service, and health roles. The occupation presents these organizations as the only available option to save Gaza’s residents from a state of total humanitarian collapse.

The occupation army believes that Hamas will not be able to disrupt the work of any of these institutions, especially given the residents’ need for any solution that might save them from their suffering. The Israeli plan is based on delegating powers to US and regional Arab health institutions to operate public hospitals by supplying all necessary operational needs from fuel to medicines, and even employing doctors and nurses, provided that they are completely independent from the Health Ministries affiliated with Hamas and Fatah.

This plan is already being tested now that a US NGO is running the European General Hospital in Khan Younis city. Informed sources tell Al-Akhbar that the same strategy will be replicated in the northern Gaza Strip, where work is underway to operate one of the private hospitals in the same manner.

Local sources warn that the hospital-related plan could be extended to all government institutions by building alternative organizations to replace government-run municipal institutions. They would be tasked with cleaning roads, repairing water and sewage networks, and operating wells. This approach is also expected to be adopted in reactivating the Gaza Ministry of Education, however it would be under the control of regional Arab governments.



Those behind this scheme are relying on the fact that there is an urgent need for these vital sectors that have been disrupted by the war. Additionally, the occupation is betting that Hamas will be unable or unwilling to obstruct any international institution providing services for residents in northern and southern Gaza. Even if Hamas is aware of the function of these organizations, stopping them from operating in Gaza would be perceived as if it is preventing new hospitals from treating patients, institutions from providing food to the hungry, or schools from educating students.

Thus, the Israeli plan is not based on completely depriving residents of vital services and requirements, but to instead create an alternative body that is empty of any political or nationalist program. This body would be responsible for transitioning Gaza’s residents from a resistance-oriented “authoritarianism” into purely humanitarian concerns, preoccupied with the complex problems left by the war, and without any political goals or demands.

However, this approach is primarily countered by public awareness, which can determine the intentions and goals of these institutions, as well as the state of popular political consciousness created by the collective Israeli massacres against all Gaza residents. Furthermore, a source in the resistance factions says that “the occupation is jumping to conclusions if it believes that it has fundamentally eliminated the structure of resistance factions and their social and cultural presence in our society.” Among the evidence for this is that ” it considered that its mission in the south was complete, yet the resistance still strikes it on a daily basis in the Tel al-Hawa and Al-Zaytoun axes.” He adds that “trying to disguise its schemes under the pressing humanitarian circumstances does not mean it will be successful. And as long as the occupation continues, the justification for the resistance’s cultural, social, and military existence continues.” He emphasizes that “the occupation’s attempts to simplify this reality will not end it.”

(Al-Akhbar)

https://orinocotribune.com/sanitized-ng ... trol-gaza/

******

Dan Kovalik on Israel's War on Gaza
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor 21 Aug 2024

Image
Palestinians fleeing to southern Rafah. Photo: Ismael Abu Dayyah/AP

I caught up with attorney, journalist, and author Dan Kovalik just as the Coalition to March on the DNC stepped off from Chicago’s Union Park on the first day of the Democratic National Convention.

ANN GARRISON: Dan Kovalik, tell us what you'd most like people to understand about your book. We have this book right here, The Case of Palestine: Why It Matters and Why You Should Care .

DAN KOVALIK: The main reason I wrote the book is to explain to the mainstream American audience that what's happening in Gaza, this genocide that's happening in Gaza, the conflict in Gaza, didn't start on October 7. This has been ongoing as far back as 1948 with the Nakba in which 750,000 Palestinians were forcibly displaced by Israeli militants, gangs in many cases, and even before that, with the Balfour Declaration of 1917 . Americans have not been taught that history. In fact, they've been willfully encouraged not to even look into that history. Palestinians have largely, as you know, been made invisible on purpose, and that goes back to the myth that the Israelis were the people without a land coming to settle a land without a people. The whole idea was that they moved to historic Palestine, but there weren't any Palestinians there, and they are doing their best to make that a reality right now.

They're making it a reality that there won't be any Palestinians left, and there won't even be a memory of them left. That's why I wrote this book.

AG: You just came back from Egypt. Tell us about what you saw.

DK: Yes, I was on a delegation to Egypt with some lawyers and also some trauma experts. We were taking testimony from Palestinian evacuees from Gaza about the crimes that they suffered in Gaza at the hands of the Israelis. People should know that about 100,000 Palestinians have been evacuated to Egypt since October 7. Almost all these folks had to pay about five to six thousand dollars per adult, and a thousand dollars per child, just to come in, and they paid it to a company owned by the son of President Sisi. It was very corrupt.

I don't want to totally criticize Egypt because at least they took these refugees in, but these refugees can't put their kids in school. They can't work. They don't have resident status, so they can't travel. It’s a very tough life for them. Obviously better than what it was in Gaza, but very tough.

We went there to talk to people about the absolutely horrific atrocities they suffered in Gaza.

AG: I know someone who got out, someone I was in touch with on Facebook, who was trying to get out because he had shrapnel in his body. Do you have to pay to get in even if you’re wounded?

DK: You might get in for free if you had a medical condition that needed treatment that you couldn't get in Gaza, and of course you can hardly get any treatment there now because Israel's destroyed most of the hospitals. If you have, for example, cancer, or you’re wounded, you might be able to get into Egypt for free. That is true. But short of that, you have to pay, even if you were living in a tent and your area was being bombed every day, you had to come up with that money.

I have a lot of friends from Gaza now living in Egypt, including a student of mine who went to the University of Pittsburgh, School of Law for years as a foreign student, and they had to raise money from friends. Many of them bankrupted themselves, basically emptied all their life savings just to get out, and they've already lost their homes. They've lost generational homes that were in their families for generations, and they showed me photos of these.

There were some people who had just built brand new homes that had taken them years to build. Everything they saved for years to build these homes is now gone, and now they're in a country where they have no right to work and no right to schooling and no right to travel. These are people without a country, and that's been true for so long.

The Palestinians are a people. They're the people without a land, and that's what people have to understand. Everything's been turned on its head. The aggressors have been made into the victims, and the victims have been made into the aggressors.

Are these Palestinians living in a concentration camp? Are they living in some kind of settlement where they can't move around because they don't have rights? They don't have resident status?

These are people without means living in cinder-block tenements that house only Palestinians. There are curfews. I wouldn't say it's like a prison, because you can leave--and we met people who left to visit us inside downtown Cairo--but it's a very austere life. It's a ghetto because it's all Palestinians, and again, even me, as an American, I would need special permission to visit there. Our delegation asked for permission and we were denied it.

So, as I said, they basically live in their own ghetto there in Egypt, unless they are persons of means who can afford an apartment or whatever. You can do that if you have means, but most of the Palestinians who came, certainly by the time they came and spent the money to cross, have nothing, and so they live in these cinder-block tenements.

AG: Is there any effort to resettle them in the West or in Africa or anywhere else? We've heard about resettlement efforts, even as outlandish as the Democratic Republic of the Congo, another of the most tortured places on the planet which already has its own internally displaced persons population of roughly seven million.

DK: Israel has, as you said, thought about resettling Palestinians to Congo, but Israel's first choice is to force all these Palestinians out of Gaza into Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, ironically, where the Israelites spent 40 years wandering in the desert. They offered to pay Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi to accept this. The offer from the United States, which is helping Israel with this ethnic cleansing, was to pay off Egypt’s $185 billion in foreign debt to construct tents in the Sinai and take all the Palestinians in Gaza. To his credit, Sisi said that Egypt would not be a part of Israel’s ethnic cleansing. He turned down the money.

When I talk about Egypt, I also want to say that they're between a rock and a hard place. They do want to provide some refuge to Palestinians in need, but they also don't want to be party to a wholesale ethnic cleansing of 2.3 million Palestinians.

And as far as I know, no one else is taking these Palestinians once they cross into Egypt unless they're Egyptian nationals to begin with. Some are Egyptian nationals because Egypt was Gaza’s protector, for lack of a better word, from about 1950 to 1967. There are a lot of Palestinians who have an Egyptian mom or dad, and they have some more rights to try to leave to go somewhere else if they have the money to, but most of those without Egyptian nationality are trapped in Egypt once they get there.

I'll give you an example. There's a woman we met with a tragic story. In a massacre by the Israelis in Gaza, she lost her husband, her oldest son, and another of her children. One of her two daughters, a five-year-old, was burned by white phosphorus, an illegal weapon according to international law. Her 18-year-old sister sustained a serious back injury while jumping out of a window trying to save her sister. Both daughters are now in a hospital in Ankara, Turkey, while the mom is trapped in Egypt. Her two younger sons, who are not even high school age, are still in Northern Gaza. She can't get her sons to Egypt, and she can't get from Egypt to Turkey to see her daughters. This resembles the fate of so many separated families.

Once again, these are people without a country. They can't travel, and I don't know any who have the ability to leave and go anywhere else.

AG: There was actually a proposal on the table to move the entire population of Gaza out into the Sinai?

DK: Yeah, but not a public one. Those discussions were had with President Sisi. The United States and Israel drew up a plan to do that. The US and other countries would have paid to construct the tents to do that, and they were willing to pay off Egypt's debts for that to happen. We know that those discussions happened early on and that Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders were talking about moving all the Palestinians in Gaza into the Sinai, and that plan is not off the table. They would still like to do that.

Maybe Sisi will eventually agree, but Egyptians on the ground, including the military people and the cops, are furious at Sisi for not doing more to help the Palestinians.

Egypt has legions. They have a navy. They could do something like Nassar tried to do in 1973 to help the Palestinians. And the people of Egypt are furious about this. So if he went ahead and built a desert encampment for the Palestinians in the Sinai, I think he would be overthrown. I don’t think he would survive that, but that's the Israeli plan, that's their hope. And at this point, short of that, they're planning on wiping out all of Gaza.

Now we’re sitting here looking at a giant truck plastered with an advertisement for Kamala Harris. A lot of people are like, “Oh, you're protesting the DNC and Kamala Harris. So you must support Trump because you're going to get Trump elected.” My response is that I don't want Trump to win. I don't want Kamala to win, right? I'm going to vote for Jill Stein, and I realize she's not gonna win. Okay? I realize one of the two are gonna win, but my concern right now is that no matter who wins, whether it's Kamala or Trump and whichever’s better or worse, they won't even be inaugurated until the end of January of next year, and the people of Gaza don't have till January. There's a famine now that is wiping out the population.

AG: Even polio.

DK: Polio and all kinds of other preventable diseases like smallpox. There is no potable water left in Gaza. The aquifers have been destroyed. There is no way to get potable water. There is very little food. I have friends still in Gaza, and all they can do is pay exorbitant amounts of money, like $100 for a little piece of meat. No one can do that. And even if you could, all that means is that whatever food they pay for is the food they got till they run out again. No food’s coming in, no water's coming in.

That’s the other thing about Egypt that you need to know. The Israelis have had the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza closed since May 7. That was the main route for humanitarian aid. There is some small trickle of aid coming in but nothing from the Rafah Crossing.

I want to encourage people to support the people of Gaza, but if you give to a relief agency, all they can do is get food and water that's already in Gaza to the people there. There's no way to get it in. Israel was closed off every crossing. There's no way to get it in by water. You remember Biden built that ridiculous pier, that $300 million pier that never worked, that failed in no time, and will never work now. So you have famine. You're seeing photos of emaciated babies dying. Of course, the babies that don't die, if they're lucky not to die, they're going to have permanent brain damage because of the lack of nutrition.

You have the most maimed children in any conflict known in history. You have tens of thousands of orphaned children, so now you have maimed, orphaned, starving children. Who's going to take care of these children? It is a horrifying situation.

AG: UNWRA reported that 10 children in Gaza were having one or both legs amputated every day without anesthesia.

DK: Yes, it’s unspeakable and, again, that's why we're here. That's why we're in Chicago to protest the DNC. Again, people may say that Trump's a bad guy, that he's worse than Kamala, and hey, I'll stipulate to that, but the point is that this is the Democrats’ war. The White House is run by the Democrats. The White House is running this war. The White House is giving billions of dollars of military assistance to Israel all the time, including 2000-pound bombs. Military experts in the US say they wouldn't use 500-pound bombs in an urban setting because then you’d just be murdering civilians, but we're giving them 2000-pound bombs to wipe out whole neighborhoods. This is Biden, this is Harris, this is what they're doing, and we have to protest them now, because again, we don't have till January to wait. The people of Gaza don’t have till January to wait for a change that probably won’t come from the Democrats anyway.

AG: You also took a recent trip to the West Bank. Tell us about that.

DK: Yes, I went to the West Bank in December, a couple months after October 7. And that was my first trip to Palestine. I went into Jordan and crossed the King Hussein Bridge into the West Bank, and it was an incredible experience. A lot of people talk about apartheid in Israel and Palestine, and you see it there right away. You see the walls that surround everything and everyone to separate Israelis and Palestinians. You see the checkpoints. You have to go through checkpoints if you're a Palestinian. You have to go through them even if you're not a Palestinian, but if you are a Palestinian, those are occasions to be harassed, imprisoned, or raped.

I'll give a little example again of what life is like there, even under the best of circumstances. I was there during Christmas—Advent—and I wanted to go to Bethlehem. I was staying in Ramallah, and the distance between Ramallah and Bethlehem is something like 15 miles. I should be able to go there in about half an hour, but it took three hours, because you have to go through all of the checkpoints or try to go around them.

I was with a guy who’s almost 80 years old. He was born before the Nakba, in 1946, and he's Jewish. Nicest guy in the world. He insisted on personally taking me to Bethlehem. He said he could get us around the checkpoints, which he did.

AG: This is a Jewish person native to Palestine who supports the Palestinians?

DK: Yes, he's even in Fatah. So he's a very interesting guy. His name is Uri Davis. In 1987 he wrote a book about Israeli apartheid. He was a very early proponent of that theory.

The only reason we were able to go to Bethlehem at all and make it even in three hours and four hours back, was because he had his yellow Israeli license plate, not a Palestinian license plate. If you're Palestinian, you get a different color. But if you don’t have that yellow-colored Israeli license plate, you can't go anywhere.

There are people I have met in Palestine who've never been to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, who've never stepped inside Jerusalem because they're not allowed. The Israelis can go anywhere with that special yellow license, but the Palestinians with the other color cannot.

AG: You have Palestinians in the West Bank who've never been able to get into Jerusalem?

DK: Yes, and you even have Palestinians who are lucky enough to be from Jerusalem and they are therefore allowed to live in Jerusalem and travel in Jerusalem, but they still can't get into the Old City to see the Al-Aqsa Mosque. That's how intense the segregation is.

Now, and people need to understand this, Israel really is in full war with the West Bank. It can’t be like Gaza because so many Israelis live there, but they are attacking the Palestinians in the West Bank with incredible force.

There are now an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 Palestinians in jail. Most of those have been arrested since October 7. Many of them have been arrested from the West Bank, and as we're learning more and more, even from mainstream sources like the New York Times, the treatment of these prisoners is incredible. They're being raped, they're being beaten, they're being killed. Sixty prisoners have been killed in jail since October 7, and many of them have been arrested without charges.

AG: Tell us about the persecution of the Christians.

DK: That's an interesting aspect of the situation. Most people don't even know that there are Palestinian Christians. Most people don't know that Jesus himself was Palestinian. But there are many Palestinian Christians, though far fewer than there used to be in Historic Palestine, because most have left. They left not because of what Israel claims, that Hamas scared them out. That's totally untrue.

They left because they’re being persecuted, particularly in the West Bank. For example, the Church of the Nativity, which is built over the cave where Jesus was born, was actually attacked by Israel. I mentioned that in the book. I believe it was in 2008. Don’t hold me to that date, but it's in the book where they shelled the Church of the Nativity. They shot people inside the Church of the Nativity, and that's a more extreme example of what's happened in the West Bank.

But in Gaza, after October 7, the Israelis actually blew up historic ancient Christian churches on purpose. They want to get rid of any remnants of the Palestinian Christian community because that's a very inconvenient community for them.

Why? Because you have so many Christian Zionists who support Israel. In fact, even Biden says he's a Christian Zionist. Mike Pompeo is a Christian Zionist. Mike Pence, the former vice president, is a Christian Zionist. It's very inconvenient for those people to know that Israelis are persecuting Christians, many Christians, when they walk around the Old City of Jerusalem. If they're known to be Christian, if they're wearing a cross, they’ll be spat upon, or their cross will be taken from their neck.

Again, these are inconvenient facts that aren't discussed much. And again, I talk about this in the book.

AG: Did you have any contact with the dissident Orthodox Jews in Israel?

DK: Not with the Orthodox per se, but again, I had plenty of contact with Jews in Jerusalem who support the Palestinian people. These are the bravest people you’ll ever meet. I met with one of them, a woman, in addition to Uri Davis, the 80-year-old Jewish gentleman who took me to Bethlehem. He actually introduced me to a friend of his named Leah. I forget her last name, but it's in the book. There's a photo of her in the book. She's a fairly older Jewish person who's an attorney in Jerusalem, in the center of town, who represents Palestinian political prisoners and has for many years. And of course, she's persecuted by other Jews. They hate her for what she does, but she has a certain amount of freedom because she is an Israeli Jew. She's very isolated, but it doesn't stop her. She's an incredible human being, and these people need to be talked about. Sadly, there aren’t as many of those people as there used to be in Israel, but those people do exist. There are people to this day, Jews in Israel, who try to protect Palestinians from the settlers who steal their property and their land, who beat up Palestinians. You know, there are those people.

Again, there used to be a lot more. There used to be a stronger kind of leftist current in Israel. There used to be a Socialist Zionism, a labor Zionism. Most of that's gone. Basically, Israel's now been ceded to the right wing. Even if Netanyahu left tomorrow, another right winger would take his place, but there are still Jews in Israel who support the Palestinians. These people need to be applauded. And again, they're an inconvenient fact for the Israelis and for the Western press.

Last week a video surfaced of a Palestinian prisoner being gang raped by Israelis. They took a poll in Israel on whether people thought it was okay to rape Palestinians, and 47% to 46% of Israelis said yes, it's okay to rape Palestinians.

AG: Dan, it sounds like you feel like it's a hopeless situation. I never imagined it could go on this long.

DK: No, I don't think any of us thought, when it started, that it could go on this long, but here we are ten months later.

AG: I think everyone thought it would be over by Christmas, that Biden would say, “Look Netanyahu, you’ve killed enough people. It's time to back off.” But nothing like that has happened. We're still sending 2000-pound bombs and the latest fighter jets. Israel is buying our top-of-the-line fighter, which actually means that we gave them our money to buy them.

DK: That’s right, and people who think that Biden couldn't stop it are wrong. In fact, you know those of us are old enough to remember Ronald Reagan. We were peace activists back then. I was one of them. Remember what a warmonger he was? But at some point during the Israeli war in Lebanon, he told Menachen Begin, “You're killing too many civilians. You’ve got to stop it.” And he stopped it with one phone call.

AG: Biden could have made that phone call, but he hasn’t, so where do we go from here?

DK: I think first of all, you know, the American people who are disgusted by this need to protest. They need to call for this to stop. I think that we have the power to stop it by protesting. I wouldn't be here if I didn't believe that. But I also think it may be settled militarily between Israel and Hezbollah and Hamas and Iran. It would be terrible, and I don't wish for that, but nothing's being done to prevent that regional war, and that's what Netanyahu wants.

I think that one-third of our Navy is now in the Mediterranean. We are preparing for that regional war, and, sadly, that is how this will probably end, with regional war. That's not what I want. I think we need to protest at the top of our lungs to prevent that, but realistically I think that's where we're headed because that's what Netanyahu wants.

I don't know if Biden or Harris, or whoever's actually running the White House now, actually want it, but they won't stop it, at least not at this moment. That's clear. There must be some people in the Pentagon that have more sense than that, that realize the kind of arsenal that Iran has, the kind of friends Iran has. I think there are probably people in the military who don't want that war, but the thing is, you know, we do have a civilian form of government where civilians control the military.

They may press for it not to happen, but if the White House wants it, they will get it. But with Biden basically out of commission because of his diminished mental capacity, and Harris doing nothing but campaigning, we don’t really know who’s running the White House. I think it has been turned over to the neocons like Anthony Blinken. I think they're running the show, and I think they’re pushing for this regional war, because that's what Netanyahu wants.

https://blackagendareport.com/dan-koval ... s-war-gaza

*****

‘UN building should be wiped off the face of the Earth’: Outgoing Israeli envoy

The official has made headlines over the past year over his continuous attacks against the UN and other organizations that condemn the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza

News Desk

AUG 21, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP/Getty Images)

Outgoing Israeli ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, on 20 August said that the UN main building in New York “should be closed and wiped off the face of the earth” and replaced with “a new body that truly represents noble values.”


“This building, which may look nice from the outside, is actually twisted and distorted,” Erdan added.

Erdan finished his tenure as Israel’s UN envoy on Monday, when his successor, Danny Ben Yosef Danon, took over. The controversial Israeli official has made headlines several times over the past year for his attacks on the UN and his attempts to disrupt sessions.


In November, the Israel envoy drew the ire of China’s UN envoy Zhang Jun after accusing UN officials and agencies of referring to Israeli victims as “mere footnotes.”

“Where was UN Women’s outrage at Hamas treating women like property and using them as human shields? Why is it that only now you have decided to talk about the women and children of Gaza?” Erdan said.

“Distinguished representative of Israel, I would like to remind you that you can fully express your different opinions in your statement, but please show respect at least for the briefers invited to the meeting. This is the consistent practice of the Security Council and a rule that everyone should abide by. I would like to remind you to pay attention. And please, continue your speech,” Zhang told Erdan.


In June, Erdan took aim at UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres after he blacklisted the Israeli army for committing grave violations against children.

“The only one being blacklisted is the Secretary-General who incentivizes and encourages terrorism and is motivated by hatred towards Israel. The Secretary-General should be ashamed of himself!” Erdan said.

https://thecradle.co/articles/un-buildi ... aeli-envoy

Israeli captives retrieved from Gaza 'suffocated to death' during army raid: Report

Numerous Israeli captives have been killed by Israeli army fire since the start of the war on the Gaza Strip

News Desk

AUG 21, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Israeli army)

Five of the six Israeli captives whose bodies were returned to Israel following an army operation this week had suffocated to death due to an attack by troops on the tunnel they were being held in, Hebrew news outlet Ynet reported on 20 August.

The bodies were recovered and brought back to Israel on Tuesday after an overnight recovery operation in Gaza’s southern city of Khan Yunis, the army announced.

Ynet says the autopsy of one of the captives showed he had been shot dead by a captor.

“Apart from him, the main assessment regarding the circumstances of their deaths in captivity of the other five abductees whose bodies were recovered tonight (between Monday and Tuesday) from Khan Yunis is that they were killed by suffocation in the tunnel where they were held – as an incidental result of an IDF attack,” it added.

The report adds that the “attack in question took place during the operation of the 98th Division in the area, about six months ago.”

It says a “Hamas target” near the tunnel was struck, causing a fire from which carbon dioxide flooded the tunnel, killing the prisoners.

“The hostages’ captors, Hamas terrorists carrying Kalashnikovs, were also located in the tunnel … lifeless.”

“The circumstances of their deaths are being investigated. When we summarize the findings, we will present them to the families and then to the public. We know that the abductees were killed while our forces were in Khan Yunis … we will investigate and give answers,” said army spokesman Daniel Hagari on 20 August.

Family members of the captives who were killed expressed anger, with one blaming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for “sacrificing” the prisoners.

The families of Israeli prisoners in Gaza have been calling for the conclusion of a ceasefire agreement and repeatedly accused Netanyahu of sabotaging the process.

The recovery of the bodies came ceasefire talks have failed once again. Hamas has rejected a new US-backed “bridging” proposal, which includes new conditions imposed by Netanyahu and fails to address the movement’s terms for a permanent ceasefire and withdrawal.

Another round – not including Hamas – is scheduled to be held in Cairo on Wednesday.

Israeli forces have killed many of their captives being held by the Palestinian resistance in the Gaza Strip, both through airstrikes and ground operations.

Three of the captives whose bodies were returned on Tuesday appeared in a video released by Hamas’ Qassam Brigades in December.

The video, titled “Don’t let us grow old here,” shows the three elderly captives.

“We are the generation who built the foundation for the creation of Israel. We are the ones who started the IDF military. We don’t understand why we have been abandoned here,” one of them is heard saying.

Over 100 Israeli captives are still being held by the resistance in Gaza.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-c ... aid-report

New evacuation orders hit Deir al-Balah as UN says displacement 'impedes Gaza aid deliveries'

Palestinian families are increasingly refusing to obey evacuation orders as Israel continues to bomb civilian shelters with abandon

News Desk

AUG 21, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Ramadan Abed / Reuters)

The Israeli army on 21 August issued new evacuation orders for hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians in the central Gazan city of Deir al-Balah, once again leaving families with nowhere to go as the invading army expands its genocidal war.


Israeli occupation forces orders more residents of Deir al Balah to evacuate their homes as their attacks getting fiercer against civilians in condensely populated areas! pic.twitter.com/0U1hAXm8dd

— Motasem A Dalloul (@AbujomaaGaza) August 21, 2024


“To all residents and displaced persons in Blocks 129, 130 in the Al-Mahta and Deir al-Balah neighborhoods to the south, from Salah al-Din Street to the street marked on the map. The IDF will act forcefully against the terrorist organizations in that area. For your safety, we urge you to evacuate immediately to the west. The area you are in is considered a dangerous combat zone,” the Israeli army’s Arabic spokesman, Avichay Adraee, said via social media.


#عاجل الى كل السكان والنازحين المتواجدين في بلوكات 129, 130 في حارات المحطة ودير البلح جنوباً، من شارع صلاح الدين وحتى الشارع المحدد على الخريطة.
⭕️جيش الدفاع الاسرائيلي سوف يعمل بقوة ضد المنظمات الارهابية في تلك المنطقة.
⭕️من أجل أمنكم، نناشدكم بالإخلاء بشكل فوري غرباً.… pic.twitter.com/gpaPZY2OEo

— افيخاي ادرعي (@AvichayAdraee) August 21, 2024


“Since the early hours of this morning, we have heard loud explosions in central Gaza, especially Deir al-Balah, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians are seeking refuge. Right now, the army is operating just a few kilometers from where we are. Explosions have been hitting houses and civil infrastructure in the eastern part of the city,” Al Jazeera’s Tareq Abu Azzoum reported on Wednesday morning from Deir al-Balah.

Abu Azzoum also confirmed that Israeli raids are ongoing in the adjacent city of Khan Yunis and in Rafah in the south, where an Israeli tank killed four Palestinian farmers, opening fire on them “without warning.”

Over 50 Palestinians have been killed across Gaza over the past 24 hours, including nearly two dozen who were massacred in an Israeli attack on a crowded market and a school sheltering displaced in Deir al-Balah.


Israel defended itself again today. This time by blowing up an outdoor area where children were playing in Deir Al - Balah. These are just some of the perpetrators it was protecting itself against. pic.twitter.com/B45o2DLVgB

— Samira Mohyeddin سمیرا (@SMohyeddin) August 20, 2024


Tel Aviv claimed it hit a “command center” used by Palestinian fighters in the school without providing any evidence.

Wednesday’s evacuation orders for Deir al-Balah were issued just hours after the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) charged Israel with making it “nearly impossible” to deliver aid to desperate Palestinians by constantly displacing survivors.

OCHA said on Tuesday that the evacuation order released on Saturday for parts of Deir al-Balah included sections of the Salah ad Din Road, a crucial passage for humanitarian missions.

“This has made it nearly impossible for aid workers to move along this key route,” the office said. “The Coastal Road is not a viable alternative. The beaches along this route are now crowded with makeshift shelters for displaced Palestinians.”

Furthermore, the Director General of the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, Mounir al-Barash, announced on Tuesday that the Israeli army “deliberately obstructed the entry of a UN humanitarian convoy carrying critical medical supplies and fuel” into Gaza.

According to UN data, nine out of 10 people living in Gaza have been forcibly displaced since 7 October, many of them several times.

https://thecradle.co/articles/new-evacu ... deliveries

Hamas calls out US 'bridging proposal' for Gaza ceasefire: 'Not what we agreed to'

The US-backed proposal includes new conditions imposed by Israel’s prime minister which are unacceptable to Hamas

News Desk

AUG 20, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

Hamas leader Osama Hamdan criticized a statement made by US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, calling on the resistance movement to accept a “bridging proposal” for a Gaza ceasefire being discussed by mediators.

Blinken’s statement “raises many ambiguities” because it is “not what was presented to us nor what we agreed on,” Hamdan told Reuters late on 19 August.

Hamdan added that Hamas has told mediators it does not “need new Gaza ceasefire negotiations; we need to agree on an implementation mechanism.”

“We only agreed to the proposal presented by [US President Joe] Biden, and the US administration failed to convince Netanyahu of it. The Israelis have backed down from issues included in Biden's proposal,” Hamdan said in a separate interview with Al Jazeera on Monday night. Talk about Netanyahu agreeing to an updated proposal means that the US administration failed to convince him of the [initial] agreement. All the American side is doing is just buying time for the genocide to continue. We only want to implement President the Biden proposal that we agreed to. We do not know the exact updated proposal being discussed, but the Israeli delegation that went to Doha presented conditions that violate it,” he added.

US President Joe Biden accused Hamas on Tuesday of “backing away” from a ceasefire deal.

Hamas responded in an official statement saying Biden and Blinken’s remarks resulted in “great astonishment and disapproval,” calling them “misleading” and a “renewed US greenlight for [Israel] to commit more crimes.”

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) also said in a statement on Tuesday that Blinken “gave the Israeli occupation government a new mandate to complete the aggression and genocidal war against the Gaza Strip.”

At a press conference in Tel Aviv on Monday, Blinken said he had a “very constructive meeting” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The prime minister “confirmed to me that Israel accepts the bridging proposal [reached by mediators in the Qatar talks last week] to try to bridge the gaps that remain between the parties.”

“He supports it. It’s now incumbent on Hamas to do the same. The next important step is for Hamas to say yes, and then, in the coming days, for all of the expert negotiators to work on clear understandings on implementing the agreement,” Blinken added.

Mossad chief David Barnea, Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, and General Nitzan Alon – members of Israel’s negotiating team – told Netanyahu that reaching a deal is not possible under his current positions, according to Israeli officials cited by Axios on 19 August.

Biden unveiled a permanent ceasefire plan in late May, claiming Israel had also agreed to the proposal. Yet Netanyahu called the proposal “incomplete” and remained insistent on having a right to continue the war and pursue Hamas after the captives’ exchange.

US and Qatari mediators eventually updated the Biden plan and presented it to Hamas in early July. The resistance movement proposed amendments to the revised plan on 3 July, which Israeli sources said were positive and could enable a deal to pass.

However, the premier’s position on pursuing the war’s goals, despite talks for a permanent ceasefire, obstructed the negotiations and prevented an agreement from being reached.

The proposal being discussed now is a further updated version of the July plan, which includes new conditions imposed by Netanyahu, including a screening mechanism for displaced Gazans who would return to the northern strip as part of an agreement, according to a Hamas source who spoke with Al-Sharq newspaper on 18 August.

According to the source, the new US-backed proposal also includes deporting a large number of Palestinian prisoners and “reducing” the number of Israeli troops on the Gaza–Egypt border’s Philadelphi Corridor and Rafah crossing – from which Hamas had demanded a withdrawal.

It also does not guarantee a permanent ceasefire. The US proposal states that “a permanent ceasefire will be discussed in the second phase within a specific limit, and if Hamas does not agree to the Israeli demands, the army will return to the war and carry out its military operations,” according to the source.

Hamas, which did not attend last week’s talks, officially rejected the terms reached by mediators in Doha.

Talks are scheduled to resume in Cairo on Wednesday.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-cal ... -agreed-to

Harris vs Trump: Who is worse for Gaza?
The US presidential election is a toss-up between a ‘soft-on-Palestine’ Democrat whose boss has armed Israel’s genocide and an unabashedly pro-Israel Republican who doesn’t like war or war budgets.


Stasa Salacanin

AUG 21, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

While foreign policy issues have rarely been a decisive factor in past US elections, the war in Gaza might shift the balance in favor of one candidate, especially in a tight race where every vote counts. A self-proclaimed Zionist, President Joe Biden’s unwavering support for Israel has contributed to his declining popularity, widening the gap between the progressive and moderate wings of the Democratic Party.

This has led to the loss of crucial constituencies, including young voters, Arab and Muslim communities, and many progressives. Additionally, many younger and left-leaning Jewish voters “no longer see unequivocal support for Israel as a litmus test.”

While the Democratic party is well aware of this vulnerability, many wonder whether its candidate, Kamala Harris, can win back disappointed voters and bring a new approach to policy toward Gaza – at this late date.

What to expect from Harris?

Media outlets have noted Harris’s recent comments as a potential shift away from Biden’s staunch pro-Israel stance, portraying her as a more empathetic voice within the administration. She recently stated she will “not be silent” about Palestinian suffering, which contrasts with Biden’s rhetoric.

However, many progressive and pro-Palestinian advocates demand more than just a change in tone – these constituents will require a substantive shift away from the US’s unconditional military support for the occupation state. As a genocide unfolds in Gaza, symbolic gestures, such as Harris’s recent decision to skip Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress, are simply no longer enough to secure these votes.

Dr Eman Abdelhadi, Assistant Professor of Comparative Human Development at the University of Chicago, points out to The Cradle that Harris, so far, has not made any policy commitments on Gaza.

She has verbally reiterated a commitment to Israel’s security, and a campaign spokesman said she would not consider an arms embargo. Essentially, only the tone has shifted, not policy … her empathy is not enough.

Many also recall how Harris opposed former president Barack Obama’s abstention in a December 2016 UN resolution condemning Israel’s illegal settlement and how she opposed the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement (although she did not formally support the anti-BDS legislation).

Despite these critiques, George Bisharat, law professor at San Francisco’s Hastings College of Law, does not foresee Harris significantly diverging from Biden’s policies on Gaza unless she wins the election.

He believes she is unlikely to undercut Biden’s authority until the end of his mandate. Also, as the election seems sure to be decided by razor-thin margins, Bisharat thinks that Harris will avoid any actions that minimize her chances of victory. He tells The Cradle:

She probably fears pro-Israel support for [Donald] Trump, particularly in the form of huge donations to his campaign, more than she sees advantage in gaining votes in Michigan and other states through a significant reorientation of policy.

Accordingly, “the Harris-Walz campaign will spend extraordinary energy monitoring the salience of the issue amongst the various groups they need support from to win the election, and therefore, for most Democrats, Gaza will not be a deal breaker,” says Dr Ranjit Singh, Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science and International Affairs from the University of Mary Washington.

For those Americans who want Harris to take a tougher stance on Israeli policies, the challenge will be to make the issue as prominent as possible. Dr Singh anticipates that pro-Palestinian groups might disrupt campaign events and even the national convention, telling The Cradle:

At this time, they have little incentive not to do so, and therefore, there could be chaos ahead if the Harris campaign doesn’t get ahead of this in coming days.

It’s a prescient observation: thousands of anti-war protestors have amassed at the Chicago convention this week, demanding that Harris institutes a ban on US arms transfers to Israel – or risk losing their votes.

‘I’m Speaking’

To date, Harris has argued that such disruption only helps elect Trump. It is a line of argumentation she delivered once again – albeit quite condescendingly – at last week’s rally in Detroit. Her logic, in Singh’s view, is “unassailable, but it’s a weak and uninspiring argument.” Harris, who is rapidly running out of time, needs to make a positive, not negative, argument to support her campaign.

Selecting Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate, rather than pro-Israel hardliner Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, might be a strategic move to win back disillusioned voters. Walz contrasts sharply with Shapiro, who previously served in the Israeli army and holds strong anti-Palestinian views.

Additionally, as a woman of color who has experienced racism in the US, Harris’s expressions of compassion for Palestinian civilians might reflect her personal understanding of injustice. Bisharat believes this personal connection, combined with her keen political instincts, indicates that she is attuned to the shifting sentiments in the US, particularly among younger voters.

Should Harris win, “she could not afford to ignore the new generation who are disgusted by the Democratic Party’s support of the Gaza genocide,” Bisharat reminds The Cradle.

Although most Democrats are unlikely to base their voting behavior on the Gaza issue alone, Singh contends that Harris will also need to offer a plausible set of proposals for ending the war, and at least suggest what should come after the guns go silent - and even hold Israeli officials at least minimally accountable for what they’ve done.

Powerful Israeli lobby

Speaking to The Cradle, Professor Joshua Landis, head of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, observes that both political parties have decided that support for Israel and the “money that pro-Israel Americans contribute to elections is indispensable.”

“One cannot expect candidates to turn their backs on Israel,” Landis notes, a view reinforced by Professor Jeffrey Sachs, who tells The Cradle that “the American political system is still in the hands of the Israel Lobby.”

Sachs argues that “both major parties in the US currently stand behind Israel’s murderous ways and are complicit in them—at least for now.” He warns that this unwavering support is leading to disaster not only for the US and Palestine but also for Israel itself, as unchecked cruelty and extremism threaten to tear apart Israeli society and its “legitimacy.”

While Harris may offer some improvement over Biden, Dr Joseph A. Kéchichian, a senior fellow at the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies in Riyadh, believes that her primary focus should be restoring the US’s global reputation.

He emphasizes that only a handful of countries still align with Washington, and if the US cares about its tarnished image, it will have to “listen” to the concerns of the international community.

‘Trump is a wild card’

Harris maintains some ambiguity on the Gaza issue to dissociate from Biden’s destructive policies while allowing her leeway to snap right back to them after the November election.

For some voters, that noncommittal position on Palestinian rights may be preferable to a Trump return to the White House. The former US president has repeatedly made it clear that he believes Israel must “finish the job” and achieve “victory.”

According to Abdelhadi, although “Republicans and Democrats have had a virtually identical policy on Israel, Trump is a wild card,” and his words should be taken seriously.

Kéchichian recalls that during his first term, Trump served Israel’s interests well: controversially moving the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, supplying Israel with advanced weaponry, and engineering the Abraham Accords, which further polarized West Asia into the Axes of Normalization and Resistance.

With opinion polls indicating that the upcoming election will be decided in key swing states like Michigan, Arizona, and Wisconsin, it wouldn’t be surprising to see pro-Israel groups channel significant resources into securing a Trump victory. There’s also concern that Trump’s return could lead to harsher measures against activists, including legal challenges and orchestrated social media attacks designed to ostracize dissenting voices.

Bernd Kaussler, Professor of Political Science at James Madison University, believes there’s no doubt that Trump would give Netanyahu or any other Likud leader free rein, potentially allowing the resettlement of Gaza by Israeli settlers and greenlighting further atrocities against Palestinians.

Yet Trump also remains the first US president, in a consecutive stream of them, who has not only not initiated a war but has sought – against the will of the Washington security establishment – to withdraw US military troops and bases from West Asia.

Professor Bisharat cautions that while Trump may not impose any more limits on Israel’s military actions than Biden has, he also doesn’t think Trump is eager to ignite a regional war any more than Biden is: “For different reasons and following different logics, Trump and Biden’s policies might end up in somewhat similar spots.”

This creates a dilemma for voters in swing states who are reluctant to reward a Democratic Party that hasn’t shifted its pro-Israel stance – which they see as pro-genocide and pro-apartheid – yet also recognize the need to preserve opportunities for more fundamental changes in the future.

https://thecradle.co/articles/harris-vs ... e-for-gaza

(There are no 'lesser evils'in this. Vote socialist or don't vote.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 23, 2024 11:31 am

August 22, 2024 by M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
Iran will hit Israel, ball is in US-Israeli court

Image
Iran’s president Masoud Pezeshkian (forefront) secured vote of confidence from the parliament for the entire list of cabinet nominees, in a rare display of unity, Tehran, August 21, 2024

There is a Zen proverb — ‘If you want to climb a mountain, begin at the top.’ All the show of contrived enthusiasm by the US President Joe Biden and CIA Director William Burns over a Israel-Hamas deal on Gaza war cannot obfuscate the grim reality that unless and until Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu greenlights it, this is a road to nowhere.

But what did Netanyahu do? On the eve of the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s arrival in Tel Aviv on Sunday to press the flesh and cajole Netanyahu to cooperate, the latter disdainfully ordered yet another air strike in in the central town of Deir Al-Balah in Gaza, killing “at least” 21 people, including six children. Biden had emphasised only the previous day that all parties involved in the Gaza ceasefire negotiations should desist from jeopardising the US-led diplomatic efforts to halt the war and secure a deal to return hostages and achieve a ceasefire to end the bloodshed.

And this was even after a ‘senior administration official’ who has been actively involved as negotiator — presumably, Burns himself — laboured to convey in a special briefing from Doha that the negotiations had reached an inflection point. The crux of the matter is that the western leaders have a maximum pressure strategy toward Iran to exercise restraint while they don’t have the moral or political courage to tackle Netanyahu, who is invidiously undermining the Doha process because he is simply not interested in a ceasefire deal that may lead to his removal from power, investigation to pin responsibility for October 7 attacks, revival of court cases against him and possible jail sentence if convicted.

Indeed, Tehran is skeptical that peace cannot come to Gaza under American mediation but taking care not to create any new facts on the ground while the Doha negotiations are under way. Tehran has adopted a mature, responsible attitude not to derail the Doha process. The point is, Iran is keen that the horrific war that the Israeli state unleashed in Gaza must be somehow brought to an end. Over 40,000 people have died so far.

That said, Hamas’ response to the US’ “bridging proposal” at Doha meeting will be a major determinant for Tehran. From available indications, there are serious disagreements over Israel’s continued military presence inside Gaza, particularly along the border with Egypt, over the free movement of Palestinians inside the territory, and over the identity and number of prisoners to be released in a swap. Both Israel and Hamas have signalled that a deal will be difficult.

On the other hand, the new Iranian government under Masoud Pezeshkian has highlighted his desire for a constructive engagement with the West and prioritises the removal of western sanctions. Pezeshkian’s nominee for the foreign ministry Abbass Araghchi reiterated these policy parameters in his testimony at the Majlis on Sunday while seeking parliament’s approval for his appointment.

Dispelling speculations that Araghchi, a career diplomat who is reputed to be a moderate, may face difficulty to garner support in the conservative-majority parliament, the Majlis recognised his high professionalism by unanimously approving his name as Iran’s next foreign minister in a vote instantaneously.

There is much food for thought here for the strategists in the White House. Suffice to say that what Pezeshkian’s predecessor late Ebrahim Raisi left behind as his foreign policy legacy will continue to guide the new government. That signals a high level of national consensus. Succinctly put, in all these years since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, there has not been a more conducive setting in the power calculus in Tehran for a pragmatic engagement with the West. It will be extremely unwise for Washington to overlook the window of opportunity to engage with Iran.

On the other hand, Tehran’s grit to push back western bullying is also at an all-time high level. The bottom line is that Iran will not submit to western diktat. In today’s circumstances, therefore, it is unrealistic to expect Tehran not to react to the Israeli aggression of July 31. Iran’s sovereignty was violated and its response will be strong and decisive, — and as a deterrent for the future as well.

No amount of muscle-flexing by Washington will frighten Tehran. The national unity, unlike in the US, is a crucial factor. The stunning endorsement by the Majlis of the entire list of cabinet ministers proposed by President Masoud Pezeshkian shows that there is no daylight between the different branches of state power. All indications are that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and Pezeshkian are on the same page — and this message has gone down the echelons of policymaking and state power in Tehran.

The contrast with the disarray in Israel’s confrontational domestic politics couldn’t be sharper.

Therefore, Iran will do what it considers necessary and an obligation — and a matter of national honour. The Deputy Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, General Ali Fadavi said on Monday, “We will determine the time and manner of punishment (of Israel). The usurping Zionist regime committed a great crime by assassinating Martyr Haniyeh, and this time it will be punished more severely than before.”

In a statement to The Wall Street Journal, Iran’s UN mission said any response must both punish the Israeli regime and deter future strikes in the country, but also “must be carefully calibrated to avoid any possible adverse impact that could potentially influence a prospective ceasefire.

“The timing, conditions, and manner of Iran’s response will be meticulously orchestrated to ensure that it occurs at a moment of maximum surprise; perhaps when their eyes are fixed on the skies and their radar screens, they will be taken by surprise from the ground — or, perhaps, even by a combination of both.”

The Iranian statement from the UN podium in New York is a message addressed to the White House that the ball is in the US-Israeli court. Interestingly, it coincided with the toned down White House readout on Biden’s call with Netanyahu on Wednesday, where Biden flagged the “defensive U.S. military deployments” and stressed the urgency of bringing the ceasefire and hostage release deal to closure and discussed upcoming talks in Cairo to remove any remaining obstacles.” It stands to reason that Tehran and Washington are communicating with each other.

Clearly, against such a heavily nuanced backdrop, the paranoia about a regional war is unwarranted, since neither Iran nor the US wants war. As for Israel, a small country, it simply lacks the capability to go to war with Iran armed with three submarines stacked with nuclear missiles as its strategic assets.

The stunning disclosure of Hezbollah’s vast network of underground missile network in southern and central Lebanon is a reality check for the Israeli political elite and settler communities on what they are up against.

As the former Israeli war minister Avigdor Lieberman puts it, Israel is engaged in a war of attrition, exactly as the Iranians wanted, having succeeded in uniting the resistance fronts. Lieberman pointed out that the agony of the indeterminate waiting for Tehran’s retaliatory operation is in itself an achievement for Tehran and the Axis of Resistance.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/iran-wi ... eli-court/

******

Satellite images reveal Israel building new land corridor inside Gaza: Report

The new corridor is located east of Gaza City and serves as further indication of Tel Aviv’s plans for a permanent presence in the strip

News Desk

AUG 21, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Jack Guez/AFP)

Satellite imagery analyzed by the Forensic Architecture research group reveals the building of a new Israeli army land corridor east of Gaza City in the northern strip since November.


“Our analysis of satellite imagery from November 2023 through July 2024 reveals evidence of a new Israeli military corridor east of Gaza City,” Forensic Architecture wrote on 20 August in an update to a report from March.

“This new corridor constitutes the second Israeli-built east–west passage through Gaza, after the so-called ‘Netzarim Corridor.’ Together, these corridors are infrastructural indications of an intended permanent Israeli military presence in the northern parts of the occupied Gaza Strip,” the research group added.

The Netzarim corridor was established by Israeli forces during the early months of the war on Gaza.

The corridor, which runs through the former grounds of the old Netzarim settlement, splits the strip in two and prevents the return of displaced Palestinians to northern Gaza.

Israeli defense officials who spoke with the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) in February said the corridor is part of Tel Aviv's “plans to maintain security control over the enclave for some time.”

The Netzarim corridor is linked to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s conditions in ceasefire talks that displaced civilians returning to the northern strip must be subjected to a screening and inspection mechanism.

Netanyahu said on 20 August that Israel refuses any withdrawal from the Netzarim corridor, as well as the Philadelphi corridor on the Gaza–Egypt border, seized by Israeli troops in May. His comments cast further doubt on the possibility of reaching a ceasefire agreement to end the war, which has devastated the Gaza Strip and killed tens of thousands of Palestinians.

The Philadelphi corridor has for years been a lifeline to the Palestinian resistance and the people of Gaza. Israel wants a permanent presence there to stifle weapons smuggling through the corridor into Gaza.

The new corridor east of Gaza City is located near the town of Beit Hanoun, according to Forensic Architecture.

Farms and orchards belonging to the displaced Abu Suffiyeh family, as well as homes, have been cleared out by Israeli forces for the establishment of this new corridor, which began in November. The road provides Israel with direct access to Gaza City.

Netanyahu confirmed in November that Israel plans an “indefinite” military and security presence in Gaza.

This indefinite presence is also part of Netanyahu’s “day-after” plan for the strip.

https://thecradle.co/articles/satellite ... aza-report

Only 70 out of 1,100 ultra-Orthodox Jews complied with draft orders: Israeli army

Top religious leaders have called on military-aged Haredi men to rebel against the draft orders as the Israeli army continues to see its losses mount inside Gaza

News Desk

AUG 22, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Matan Golan/Anadolu Agency)

The Israeli army revealed on 21 August that only about 70 ultra-Orthodox Jewish men reported to military induction centers since Tel Aviv issued the first batch of draft orders to the Haredi sector last month in a bid to overcome its manpower woes.

“Warning that those who repeatedly ignore invitations could face arrest, the IDF said that those who did not report on Wednesday as expected will be called again at a future date,” the Times of Israel reported.

The army added that only seven Haredi men showed up at induction centers on Wednesday.

Draft orders began going out last month after the High Court of Justice ruled that ultra-Orthodox men eligible for service must be drafted into the military. Previously, the Haredim avoided conscription by enrolling in yeshivas and obtaining repeated one-year service deferrals until they reached the age of military exemption.

Haaretz previously reported that 6,000 ultra-Orthodox men are expected to receive draft notices. The army previously said it could draft 3,000 out of 67,000 eligible Haredim (the equivalent of five military divisions).

In response to the draft orders, the Haredi community has held several protests, saying they would rather “die before enlisting.” On Wednesday, around 100 Haredim clashed with Israeli police in occupied Jerusalem.


Protesters were seen blocking a street near a military base and clashing with police officers who tried to disperse them. In one scene, one of the protesters was heard calling the police “Nazis.”

In the days after the High Court ruling, Rabbi Dov Lando, leader of the Lithuanian ultra-Orthodox community in Israel, lashed out at the Israeli judicial system after it eliminated the military exemption for the ultra-Orthodox, saying that the courts had “declared war against the world of Torah.”

The attempt to draft thousands of Haredim into service comes as the Israeli army faces a severe manpower crisis after 10 months of its genocidal war on Gaza. Earlier this week, the army announced plans to recall 15,000 Israelis up to age 35 who had previously completed mandatory military service starting at age 18.

https://thecradle.co/articles/only-70-o ... raeli-army

Israel faces collapse 'in less than a year' if war of attrition continues: Retired general

Facing a crumbling economy, global calls for boycotts, internal strife, a shortage of troops, and war on several fronts, Israeli authorities have continued to sabotage ceasefire talks that could quell regional tensions

News Desk

AUG 22, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Noam Revkin Fenton/Flash90)

The former ombudsman of the Israeli army, reserve General Yitzhak Brik, says his country “faces collapse in less than a year” if the war against the Palestinian resistance in Gaza and the Lebanese resistance in the north continues at its current pace.

In an opinion column published by Haaretz on 21 August, Brik claims Defense Minister Yoav Gallant has begun to “sober up,” pointing to Gallant’s recent comments in which he called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s promises of “total victory” in Gaza “gibberish.”

“[Gallant] has started to understand that if a regional war breaks out due to failure to reach a [ceasefire deal], Israel will be in danger,” Brik says, adding that “Gallant already understands that the war has lost its purpose. We are sinking into the mud, losing fighters who are killed and wounded, with no chance of achieving the main goal.”
“Indeed, the country is galloping to depreciation. If the war of attrition against Hamas and Hezbollah continues, Israel will collapse in no more than a year,” the former army commander highlights.

Brik goes on to list the many threats facing Israel 10 months into its campaign of genocide in Gaza, including intensifying attacks inside its territory, a manpower crisis in the army due to heavy losses, a crumbling economy made worse by global calls to boycott the country, possible embargoes on arms shipments, and the “loss of social resilience and hatred between the parts of the population, which can ignite and cause it to crash from within.”

“All roads of political and military rank lead Israel to the slope … Israel has entered an existential spin, and it may soon reach a point of return,” Brik concludes.

His stark warning comes as political sources revealed to Israeli media on Thursday that Netanyahu “did not change his positions” on the terms for a Gaza ceasefire deal after speaking with US President Joe Biden the night before.

Ceasefire negotiations are set to resume in the Egyptian capital in the coming days without the presence of Hamas, as the Palestinian group has rejected a new US-backed proposal and has remained steadfast in demanding Israel adhere to the terms of an earlier proposal it agreed to on 2 July, saying the one-sided talks give Israel “more time to perpetuate the war of genocide against our people.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-fa ... ed-general

War of words intensifies between Israel's top security officials


Defense Minister Gallant said National Security Minister Ben Gvir posed a 'threat to national security'

News Desk

AUG 23, 2024

Image
Ben Gvir and Gallant (Photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir is irresponsible and poses a threat to Israeli national security, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant stated on 23 August.

Channel 12 reported Friday that Gallant attacked Ben Gvir, saying that his angry exit from the session of the Israeli Security and Political Affairs Cabinet was an irresponsible act that put his country at risk.

Ben Gvir left the meeting after calling for the resignation of Israel’s internal security (Shin Bet) chief, Ronan Bar, who criticized Ben Gvir’s provocative recent visit to Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied Jerusalem and his broader support for Jewish settler violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.

On 13 August, Ben Gvir and hundreds of settlers stormed the courtyards of Al-Aqsa under the protection of the Israeli police, while 70 armed settlers carried out a pogrom against Palestinians in the West Bank town of Jit, killing one person, on 16 August.

Defense Minister Gallant said on the social media site X, “In the face of Minister Ben Gvir’s irresponsible actions that endanger the national security of the State of Israel and create an internal division in the nation, the head of the Shin Bet and his people perform their duty and warn against the serious consequences of these actions.”

Ben Gvir responded on X by saying, “You promised to return Lebanon to the Stone Age, while you are returning northern Israel to the Stone Age.”

Ben Gvir added, “Instead of attacking me on Twitter, [Gallant] should attack Hezbollah in Lebanon.”

The war between Hezbollah and Israel has slowly escalated since it began in October last year.

Walla news site reported on 23 August that “Israel’s panic and its avoidance of a powerful attack in the north continues.” The Hebrew language newspaper noted that in January, Hezbollah fired 344 missiles and rockets toward Israel. In July, Hezbollah fired three times as many, about 1,091.

“The trend is clear, and it is that the number of missiles and rockets has increased steadily since the beginning of the year.”

Walla reports further that 44 Israelis have been killed and 271 injured by Hezbollah attacks, according to statistics prepared by the Prime Minister’s Office.

At the same time, Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah and Lebanon have killed at least 601 people in Lebanon. Al Jazeera reports that a Syrian woman and her two children were among the 10 people killed in an Israeli strike on a factory on 17 August.

The Qatari news outlet added that according to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, Israel, Hezbollah, and other armed groups in Lebanon exchanged at least 8,533 attacks across the border from 7 October to 31 July.

Israel conducted about 82 percent of these attacks, totaling 7,033 incidents.

https://thecradle.co/articles/war-of-wo ... -officials

‘No Israeli withdrawal, no ceasefire deal’: Hamas


A new US-backed ‘bridging proposal’ has failed to address the resistance’s main terms for a Gaza ceasefire

News Desk

AUG 22, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement released a joint statement on 22 August, confirming that the resistance will reject any agreement that does not include an Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.

The joint statement was issued following a meeting between PIJ Secretary-General Ziad Nakhala and Hamas Shura Council head Mohammad Darwish in Qatar’s capital, Doha.

The statement stressed the “necessity of stopping the aggression and war to which the Palestinian people are being subjected and punishing the leaders of the occupation for the crimes they are committing against humanity.”

“The position of the resistance and the Palestinian people on achieving any agreement is a comprehensive cessation of aggression, a complete withdrawal from the Strip, the start of reconstruction, and the end of the siege with a serious exchange deal,” the joint statement added.

It also held “the occupation leaders responsible for aborting the efforts undertaken by the mediators through their insistence on continuing the aggression and denying what was done in previous stages, especially the proposal approved by the movement [Hamas] on 2 July.”

Additionally, the Hamas and PIJ statement renewed the call for the immediate delivery of sufficient amounts of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza, warning of the “consequences of the continued collective punishment” by Israel.

The statement comes as a new round of ceasefire talks – unattended by Hamas – are expected to kick off in the coming days.

The meetings were initially scheduled for Wednesday in the Egyptian capital but were delayed to an unspecified date.

“The high-level Cairo meeting regarding the negotiations will be held on Saturday or Sunday. The negotiating team is working around the clock to bridge the gap, including the Philadelphi file with Egypt,” an Israeli official told Yedioth Ahronoth on Thursday.

Hamas has rejected a new US-backed proposal – which Washington says Israel has agreed to – for failing to address the group’s demands for a permanent ceasefire, withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and several other issues.

It is unclear precisely what is in the new proposal. A Hamas official told Al-Sharq on 20 August that the proposal does not include an Israeli withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor on the Gaza-Egypt border, as Hamas’ terms stipulate.

Netanyahu himself confirmed on 20 August that Israel would refuse any withdrawal from the Gaza–Egypt border.

The source also said the proposal demands a screening mechanism to inspect displaced Gazans who would return to the northern strip as part of an agreement – one of the many Israeli conditions complicating recent negotiations.

It also does not guarantee a permanent ceasefire. The US proposal states that “a permanent ceasefire will be discussed in the second phase within a specific limit, and if Hamas does not agree to the Israeli demands, the army will return to the war and carry out its military operations,” according to the source.

https://thecradle.co/articles/no-israel ... deal-hamas
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 24, 2024 11:32 am

Noa Argamani blasts Israeli media: ‘Hamas did not injure me, an airstrike did’

The poster-girl for Israeli captives in Gaza, freed by an operation that killed hundreds of civilians, was recently paraded around Congress during Netanyahu’s Washington visit

News Desk

AUG 23, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Richard A. Brooks/AFP via Getty Images)

Noa Argamani, the Israeli captive freed by an army operation that killed hundreds of Palestinian civilians, has lashed out at the media for misreporting comments she made about her time in captivity.


“I can’t ignore what happened in the media in the last 24 hours. Things were taken out of context,” Argamani stated in an Instagram story posted to her account on 23 August.

“I was not beaten and my hair was not cut. I was in a building that was bombed by the Air Force. The exact quote is: ‘This past weekend, after the shooting, as I said, I had cuts all over my head and was injured all over my body.’ I emphasize that I was not beaten, but injured all over my body by the collapse of a building on me,” Argamani added.

She went on to say that as a “victim of 7 October I will not allow myself to be victimized once again.”

Israeli media had falsely quoted the former Israeli captive as saying that Hamas beat her all over her body and cut her hair while she was in captivity during a meeting with G7 embassy representatives in Tokyo.

Before being updated, an article in the Jerusalem Post describing Argamani’s experience in captivity was published with the title: “Hamas beat me all over my body.”

In early June, Israel launched a rescue operation in the Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza to retrieve Argamani and three other captives. Nearly 300 Palestinians were massacred in the process.

Argamani was notably paraded by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during his speech to the US Congress in July.

Her testimony on Friday echoes that of other Israeli captives who have, since being released, described their experience with Hamas as much less frightening than the Israeli airstrikes that constantly rained overhead.

“We were in tunnels, terrified that it would not be Hamas, but Israel, that would kill us, and then they would say Hamas killed you,” a freed captive said during a tense meeting with Netanyahu in December.

Israeli forces have killed many of their captives being held by the Palestinian resistance in the Gaza Strip, both through airstrikes and ground operations.

The bodies of six Israeli captives were returned to Israel this week following an overnight army operation.

According to Hebrew news site Ynet, the captives had died months ago, suffocating to death after a nearby Israeli airstrike flooded the tunnel they were in with toxic gases.

Argamani’s social media post comes less than two weeks after Hamas’ Qassam Brigades announced the accidental killing of an Israeli captive.


“After investigating the killing of an enemy captive by his guard, it became clear that the soldier in charge of the guard acted in a vengeful manner, contrary to instructions, after receiving news of the martyrdom of his two children in one of the enemy’s massacres,” Qassam Brigades spokesman Abu Obeida said in a statement on 15 August.

“We stress that the incident does not represent our ethics and religious teachings in dealing with captives, and we will tighten the instructions after the incident was repeated in two cases so far,” he added.

“We hold the enemy fully responsible for all the suffering and dangers that its captives are exposed to as a result of its violation of all the rules of humane and humanitarian treatment and its practice of brutal genocide against our people.”


https://thecradle.co/articles/noa-argam ... strike-did

‘Justice is sleeping’: Yezidis struggle to punish Kurds who greenlit genocide

On the 10th anniversary of the Yezidi genocide by ISIS, survivors are still struggling to get the international community to identify and punish the Kurdish collaborators who helped pave the path for slaughter.


The Cradle's Iraq Correspondent

AUG 23, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

In August 2014, the terror group ISIS slaughtered thousands of men and enslaved thousands of women and children from the Yezidi religious minority in the Sinjar region of Iraq.

Ten years later, Yezidis, who survived their genocide by ISIS and fled to Europe as refugees, established a protest camp in front of the German parliament in Berlin to tell the truth about what happened.

Yezidi activists speaking with The Cradle say they want the world to know that politicians and military leaders of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region (IKR), led by Masoud Barzani and his family, partnered with ISIS in planning and executing the genocide.

“Barzani and the Kurds are the most responsible for what happened to us,” Farhad Shamo Roto, a survivor of the genocide, tells The Cradle. Farhad is among several Yezidi activists who helped establish the Voice of Yezidis for the Truth of Genocide (VETO-G) protest camp in Berlin.

Betrayal

In the weeks leading up to the massacre in 2014, the Peshmerga – Kurdish security forces under Barzani’s control – publicly claimed they would protect Sinjar until their “last drop of blood.” But Yezidis did not then know Barzani had agreed with ISIS to allow the terror group to carry out the genocide.

Under orders from Barzani, the Peshmerga disarmed Yezidis and prevented them from fleeing Sinjar, leaving them defenseless, open targets for the terror to follow. As Farhad and others in the encampment and inside Iraq have repeatedly confirmed to The Cradle:

Barzani’s Peshmerga left Sinjar without notice, allowing ISIS to attack, after they had used all means to convince us that they would protect Sinjar through their official media and their leaders.

Farhad escaped the ISIS massacre with his family at the age of 17. After three years of living in a tent in an internally displaced person (IDP) camp in the IKR, he became a refugee in France. He is now completing a PhD on the Yezidi genocide at the prestigious Centre d’Etudes Diplomatiques et Strategiques in Paris.

Silencing the truth

Like most Yezidis, Farhad initially remained silent about the Kurdish responsibility for the genocide. While living in the IDP camp, he feared retaliation from Barzani’s secret police, the Asayish.

Even in Europe, he and other Yezidis fear that speaking publicly about Barzani’s role in planning the genocide could get them, or their relatives still living in the camps, murdered.

But over time, Farhad mustered the courage to speak out. He established an NGO to highlight the Kurdish role in the Yezidi genocide at academic conferences and in media interviews. Barzani’s political party tried to buy Farhad’s silence by offering to pay for his PhD studies in Paris, but he refused, and continued to speak out.

After being chosen for the Obama Foundation’s Young Leader program in 2020, Farhad was invited to a meeting with French President Emmanuelle Macron. Farhad told him of the Kurdish role in the genocide and asked him to visit Shingal (Sinjar) to hear the truth firsthand from other genocide survivors.

“I would love to come,” Macron told Farhad, “But the Kurds do not accept this.”

Soon after, Farhad began receiving threats. In March 2022, two cars full of men screaming racist slogans blocked Farhad’s car on the road in Paris. When he got out to confront the men, they tried to kill him by ramming him with their vehicle. He escaped, but his wrist was crushed, needing multiple surgeries to recover. Farhan spent the next three months in hiding and under the protection of French authorities.

The long arm of the Kurds

While the German government has recognized the Yezidi genocide, it has not acknowledged the role of its Kurdish counterparts in Iraq in perpetrating it.

Immediately after the genocide in 2014, the German government began providing weapons and funding to Barzani’s Peshmerga, who falsely claimed ISIS was its enemy rather than its intimate partner.

Yezidi–German immigration lawyer Kareba Hagemann has tried to inform members of the German parliament of the Kurdish role in the Yezidi genocide but says the influence of Kurds in the German political system makes this difficult.

“A Kurdish person here in Germany warned me that I shouldn’t criticize them, especially Barzani, because ‘the arm of Barzani is long.’ It was a threat to me to stop my work,” Hagemann told The Cradle.

“They even have influence in the German parliament,” Hagemann added. An employee of a German MP threatened her as well, telling Hagemann “[not to] dare say anything negative about the Kurds.”

Canadian–Yezidi human rights activist Mirza Ismail has also received threats for his work exposing the Barzani family’s role in the 2014 Genocide.

“I can’t go to the Kurdistan region of Iraq because I have received death threats,” Ismail told The Cradle. “Even Lalish, our holy place, I cannot visit because the area is under Barzani’s control.”

Ismail has testified about crimes committed by ISIS during the genocide to the US Congress and Canadian parliament. But when he tried to present evidence of the Kurdish role to officials from the Obama administration – who could have taken action to prevent the genocide – they refused to speak with him.

The Obama officials said we don’t want to see it. Why didn’t they want to see it? Because that means you are not guilty of allowing this to happen. That way, they can claim that they don’t know. But you cannot hide the evidence. It’s everywhere.

Another Yezidi activist told The Cradle that Barzani’s secret police killed one of his relatives after he spoke out against the Peshmerga occupation of Sinjar even before the 2014 genocide. He now lives in a western country as a refugee, having fled there after the ISIS massacre. But he has received threats from Kurds in his new country of residence as well.

“Justice is sleeping,” he said. “We hope one day it will wake up. We do not think God will tolerate this injustice forever.”

Deportation

Ten years after the genocide, hundreds of thousands of Yezidis who fled the ISIS onslaught in Shingal (Sinjar) still live in overcrowded IDP camps in the Kurdish region of Iraq.

International NGOs provide billions to the Kurdish authorities to operate the camps, but the majority of this aid does not reach displaced Yezidis, protesters in Germany say.

One Yezidi who lived for years at the Shariya Camp near Dohuk told The Cradle that Yezidis continue to live in tents, receive only two hours of electricity a day, and suffer from food and water shortages.

However, he said, when representatives of the international NGOs visited the camp, electricity and water were provided 24 hours a day, and rations were distributed generously.

The NGO workers write glowing reports about the generosity of Kurdish authorities in hosting Yezidis. But, when they leave, camp conditions regress once again.

The Kurdish secret police, Asaysh, have informers in the camps and watch them closely. Yezidis, angered by the conditions in the camps, where a generation of Yezidi children have now spent their entire childhoods, are scared to speak out for fear of being arrested and disappeared by the Asaysh.

No one dares publicly ask, “Where do the billions in funding from the international community and NGOs really go?”

Another genocide?

Yezidis protesting at the VETO-G Camp in Berlin also expressed their fears that another genocide looms. They have demanded that Germany end its policy of deporting Yezidis to Iraq, who have recently made the dangerous journey to safety.

Kareba Hagemann tells The Cradle she is shocked that the government in Berlin is sending genocide survivors back to Iraq, where the Kurdish perpetrators of the 2014 genocide remain in power.

But the Yezidis living under Kurdish rule in the IDP camps in the IKR are completely defenseless and at the mercy of the Barzani government. They could easily be massacred in huge numbers, as in 2014, should the Kurdish leaders decide to carry out or incite a new genocide.

Hate speech

Fears of another genocide exploded on 9 August, just one week after the tenth-anniversary Genocide protest in Berlin.

Thousands of Yezidis fled in fear from IDP camps in the Kurdish region of Iraq following a barrage of threats from Kurds on social media and in mosques threatening to repeat the genocide carried out by ISIS 10 years before.

Yezidi sources speaking with The Cradle stated that the Asaysh quickly sealed the camp exits once evidence of the exodus became clear and did not allow any more families to leave.

One source said, “What I am seeing now is like the genocide in 2014. I see hundreds of cars and trucks, each packed full of as many people as possible, trying to escape to Sinjar.”

Meanwhile, Kurdish social media users can be seen inciting violence against the persecuted religious minority, making comments like, “All Yezidis are infidels and share the same ideology. ISIS made a mistake by leaving any of them alive. They should have eradicated them, along with Lalish [a Yezidi holy site], from the face of the earth.”

Remembering Tel Ezer and Siba Sheikh Khidr

Yezidis also gathered in front of the parliament in Berlin on 14 August to hold a vigil for the 17th anniversary of the massive terror attack on the towns of Tel Ezer and Siba Sheikh Khidr in Sinjar.

On 14 August 2007, four coordinated suicide car bombs detonated in the Yezidi towns of Tel Ezer (Qahtaniyah) and Siba Sheikh Khidir (Jazirah), killing 796 people and injuring 1,500 more.

In the wake of the terror attack, the second largest in Iraq’s bloody history, Iraqi Brigadier General Abdul Karim Khalaf said the carnage looked like the aftermath of a “mini-nuclear explosion.”

One Yezidi who spoke with The Cradle described running to the site of the incident in the center of Tel Ezer after hearing the explosion. Only five years old at the time, he discovered the body of his brother, which was torn in half by the blast.

Another survivor speaking to The Cradle said he was playing football in the street in Tel Ezer when the bomb detonated. Also, just five years old at the time, he broke down in tears as he described how his sister was blown to pieces standing just feet from him.

The US military immediately announced the bombing had all the “hallmarks of Al-Qaeda,” but multiple Yezidis from Tel Ezer speaking with The Cradle stated that the bombing was done in coordination with the Peshmerga, who were in tight control of both towns.

“No one believes Al-Qaeda was responsible for the truck bombs,” a survivor of the massacre from Tel Ezer told The Cradle.

Support from powerful states

However, those in the international community refuse to tell the truth about the Kurdish role in the Yezidi genocide, which is ongoing.

In 2015, prominent human rights lawyer Amal Clooney testified to the UN Security Council, claiming to advocate for the Yezidi genocide victims.

Clooney stated, “We know that what we have before us is genocide, and we know that it is still ongoing. We know exactly who the perpetrators are. ISIS brags about its crimes online.”

However, she then claimed, “We know that these perpetrators have no political support from any of the powerful states.”

But, ISIS had immense support from powerful states. Rather than tell the truth that Masoud Barzani and the Peshmerga conspired with ISIS to perpetrate the genocide, with help from the US, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, and Israel, Clooney pointed the finger solely at the lowly ISIS foot soldiers who carried out the crime on behalf of their immensely powerful political sponsors.

Because Amal Clooney and others in the international community refuse to expose the truth of the Yezidi genocide, the task is left to courageous activists like Farhad Shamo Roto, Mirza Ismail, Kareba Hagemann, and the many other Yezidis whose names will never be known, but who are risking their lives to awaken justice from its sleep.

https://thecradle.co/articles/justice-i ... t-genocide

Lebanon records over 2,000 casualties from Israeli attacks since 8 Oct
Israeli attacks have killed 564 people, among them 422 Hezbollah fighters and 142 civilians

News Desk

AUG 23, 2024

Image
three sisters and their grandmother in Lebanon in November 2023. (Photo credit: Sky News)

The Lebanese Health Ministry has released its latest figures on the number of Lebanese killed and injured by Israel since the start of the war with Hezbollah in October, L'Orient Today reported on 22 August.

As of 20 August, Israeli attacks have killed 564 Lebanese and injured 1,848. At least 678 of those injured required hospitalization.

The ministry's statistics report that 84 percent of the victims are men, and 93 percent are Lebanese nationals, with 53 percent aged between 25 and 44.

Citing figures from the International Organization for Migration (IOM), the ministry reported that 110,099 Lebanese have been displaced from the border region in the country’s south.

According to L'Orient Today, 422 Hezbollah fighters have been killed fighting Israel. The Lebanese paper reports that 380 have been killed in Lebanon. The remainder were killed operating in neighboring Syria.

Last week, Israeli forces massacred at least thirteen people, including a mother and her two children, in an airstrike in the Nabatieh Governorate in southern Lebanon, while five more were injured.

The Israeli army has launched 6,142 attacks on Lebanese soil from 7 October to 21 June, according to an analysis by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED).

Three hundred of these attacks have hit Aita al-Shaab, a village located one kilometer from the border with Israel and which, in the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah war, saw 85 of its homes destroyed.

Other towns regularly targeted by the Israeli army include Ras al-Naqoura (246 attacks), which hosts the headquarters of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL); the southern village of Hula (219 attacks), where the Israeli army massacred dozens of unarmed men between 31 October and 1 November 1948; Kfar Shuba (218 attacks), the second largest village in southern Lebanon; and the village of Kfar Kila (209 attacks).

Although most of Israel's attacks have been concentrated in and around these southern villages, Israeli drones and jets have hit the cities of Tyre and Saida several times, as well as numerous locations in the Bekaa Valley in northern Lebanon.

According to reports in western media, the near-daily airstrikes, artillery shelling, and indiscriminate use of incendiary chemical white phosphorus by the Israeli army have made much of the five-kilometer border zone “uninhabitable.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/lebanon-r ... ince-8-oct

'Jewish terrorism' endangers Israel’s existence: Intelligence chief

Jewish settlers are carrying out pogroms against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank with increasing support from the Israeli government

News Desk

AUG 23, 2024

Image
A man checks the damage a day after an attack by Jewish settlers on the village of Jit near Nablus in the West Bank, on August 16, 2024. (Photo credit: Jaafar ASHTIYEH / AFP)

“Jewish terrorism is endangering Israel’s existence,” said Ronen Bar, the head of the Shin Bet security service, in the wake of a Jewish settler pogrom against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank.

The leaders of Israel’s religious settler movement “want to cause the system to lose control, causing indescribable damage to Israel,” Bar wrote on 22 August in a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his ministers, and the attorney general.

Bar wrote that “a sense of hidden support” among government and army members for these acts is increasing considerably, reflected in “the significant expansion” of those participating.

Jewish settlers have organized multiple pogroms targeting Palestinians in the West Bank this year to drive them from their villages and farmland.

On 15 August, more than 70 armed Jewish settlers invaded the Palestinian town of Jit in the occupied West Bank, firing bullets and tear gas at residents and setting several homes and cars and other property on fire.

Settlers killed 23-year-old Rashid Sedda during the pogrom. The Palestinian Authority’s Ministry of Health confirmed the 23-year-old Palestinian died due to a gunshot wound to the chest.

The Shin Bet head notes the “perpetrators of Jewish terror” have lost all fear of administrative detention “due to the conditions they get in prison and the funds they receive after their release from Knesset members as well as legitimacy and praise, alongside a delegitimization campaign against the defense officials.”

Ronan Bar says the character of Jewish terrorist acts has changed “from focused covert activity to broad, open activity ... Sometimes using weapons that were distributed by the state lawfully. From evading the security forces, to attacking the security forces. From cutting themselves off from the establishment to receiving legitimacy from certain officials in the establishment.”

Prominent Israeli minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who controls the Israeli police, has distributed weapons to Jewish settlers in the West Bank to promote attacks on Palestinians.

Ben Gvir has stated he wishes to ethnically cleanse both Gaza and the West Bank of their indigenous Palestinian inhabitants to clear the way for Jewish settlement in their place.

After last week’s pogrom in Jit, Haaretz journalist Nehemia Shtrasler stated that the pogroms are part of a “masterplan to cleanse the land of Palestinians.”

Shin Bet chief Bar continued, “We’re on the threshold of a significant, reality-changing process. The damage to Israel, especially at this time, and to the majority of the settlers is indescribable.”

Bar warned of “world delegitimization even among our best friends” while calling settler acts “A large stain on Judaism and on all of us.”

Bar said, “An unequivocal statement across the board is needed that this is a wrong and dangerous activity – both ideologically and to security. It must be one of the government’s main goals. Soon before it’s too late. This activity creates a most significant risk to the region’s security.”

In response to the settler pogrom in Jit, Haaretz commentator Gideon Levy asked why Israelis like Ronan Bar are “shocked by a West Bank settler riot, but blind to a massacre in Gaza?”

He stated that “In Jit, Hawara, Qusra, the South Hebron Hills and the northern part of the Jordan Valley, there are indeed people living under the terror of settlers, but compared to the havoc the army is wreaking in Gaza and in the West Bank, the settler riots are but a summer camp. A summer camp of horror, but only of minor dimensions.”

“The pogrom in Jit is perpetrated by the army on a daily basis, in a much more murderous version, in refugee camps in Tul Karm, Jenin, Nablus, and obviously in Gaza. A pogrom every day. But only the settlers elicit shock,” Levy added.

The Israeli army’s 10-month military campaign in Gaza has killed over 40,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children, and is widely viewed as genocide.

https://thecradle.co/articles/jewish-te ... ence-chief

Infant paralyzed by polio in Gaza as WHO struggles to launch broad vax campaign

The first case of polio in Gaza in 25 years is being attributed to Israel's destruction of the strip's water and sanitation infrastructure

News Desk

AUG 23, 2024

Image
A Palestinian child walks on a street in Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip on July 23, 2024 (Photo credit: Eyad Baba / AFP via Getty Images file)

The WHO confirmed that a 10-month-old baby in Gaza is now paralyzed due to polio, the first case in more than 25 years, UNRWA chief Philippe Lazzarini stated on 23 August.

“Polio will not make the distinction between Palestinian & Israeli children,” Lazzarini wrote while announcing the beginning of a UNRWA campaign to give Palestinian children in Gaza the polio vaccine through WHO clinics and mobile health teams.

“Delaying a humanitarian pause will increase the risk of spread among children,” he added.

“It is not enough to bring the vaccines into Gaza and protect the cold chain. To have an impact, the vaccines must end up in the mouths of every child under the age of 10.”

The Israeli military body responsible for Palestinian civilian affairs, COGAT, announced last week it is “preparing to support a comprehensive vaccination campaign.” The military said a vaccination campaign has begun for all Israeli ground troops and that it was working with aid agencies to deliver vaccines into Gaza.

Polio is a highly infectious disease that spreads in contaminated water or food and usually strikes children under five. About one in 200 infections results in paralysis. Among those, a small percentage die when their breathing muscles are crippled.

Vaccinating children in Gaza against polio may carry the risk of further spreading the disease.

AP reported in 2019 that four African countries reported new cases of polio linked to the oral vaccine and that “global health numbers show there are now more children being paralyzed by viruses originating in vaccines than in the wild.”

AP adds that the Independent Monitoring Board, a group set up by WHO to assess polio eradication, warned in a report that the vaccine-derived poliovirus was “spreading uncontrolled in West Africa, bursting geographical boundaries and raising fundamental questions and challenges for the whole eradication process.”

On 17 August, CNN reported that Hamas welcomed the call from the UN agencies on Friday for a seven-day “polio pause” while stressing the need for clean drinking water and elimination of human waste in internally displaced person camps.

The health ministry in Gaza warned in a statement that preventing the spread of polio requires “a radical solution to the problems of sanitation and accumulation of waste among the tents for the displaced.”


Earlier this month, Palestinian Minister of Health Dr Majed Abu Ramadan warned that Israel’s bombardment had destroyed 80 percent of the healthcare infrastructure in Gaza.

Most hospitals are out of service, and those that have remained operational are working only partially “due to direct damage and the loss of qualified medical staff” due to displacement, according to the minister.

“We are facing a humanitarian catastrophe by all indications and evidence,” he said.

On 23 August, CNN reported that “children are drinking from puddles and wading through sewage pools, as Israel pummels water systems in Gaza.”
CNN said that a video emerged on social media of Israeli soldiers wiring explosives to pumps at the Canada Water reservoir in Rafah, southern Gaza.

Moments later, the soldiers detonated the explosives, destroying a reservoir that could hold three million liters of water.

The reservoir was central to the treatment and distribution of water in the Rafah Governate, according to the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), providing water for 150,000 people before the start of the war in October last year.

A high-ranking Israeli army officer, Colonel Erez Eshel, stated in early November while on the outskirts of Gaza City: “[Revenge is] a great value ... for the next century everyone will know not to mess with the Jews ... This place will be a plowed field, they won't be able to live here.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/infant-pa ... x-campaign

******

Dire Warnings As Israel's Fascists Have Taken Over The Rein

Alastair Crooke is a former MI6 agent and negotiator of hostage releases in the Middle East. He has an intimate knowledge of Israel.

Recently Crooke has written a lot about the internal changes in Israel. The supremacist settlers have taken over the rein:

An eschatological Right-wing cult now holds the majority in cabinet – and wields a vigilante militia ready to attack the military establishment, and the Israeli state. No one was arrested for the attack and take-over of the two bases. They do not dare.
Moshe “Bogie” Ya’alon, former Chief of Staff of the IDF, who also served as Israel’s Defence Minister, had this to say in a video interview on the forces taking over in Israel:

“When you talk about Smotrich and Ben Gvir: They have a Rabbi. His name is Dov Lior. He is the Rabbi of the Jewish Underground, who intended to blow up the Dome of the Rock – and before that the buses in Jerusalem. Why? In order to hurry up the ‘Last War’. Do you [not] hear them talking in terms of the Last War; or of Smotrich’s concept of ‘subjugation’? Read the article he published in Shiloh in 2017. First of all, this concept rests on Jewish supremacy: Mein Kampf in reverse”.
“My hair stands on end when I say that – as he said it. I learned and grew up in the house of Holocaust survivors and ‘never again’. It is Mein Kampf in reverse: Jewish supremacy: and therefore [Smotrich] says: “My wife won’t go into a room with an Arab”. It is anchored in ideology. And then actually what he aspires to – as soon as possible – is to go to a big war. A war of Gog and Magog. How do you start the flames? A massacre like the [1994] Cave of the Patriarchs? Baruch Goldstein is a student of this Rabbi. Ben Gvir has hung up Goldstein’s picture [in his house]”.

"This is what goes into the decision-making process in the Israeli government”.

Rabbi Dov Lior has been described by Netanyahu as the “élite unit that leads Israel”, because of his influence and control over the settler forces. The 1948 Irgun, drawing heavily on the Mizrahim, is being reborn?

Isn’t it time that the western ruling structures raised their eyes from their reverie, and read the runes that manifest all around them? Some serious players don’t think as you westerners do; they seek Gog and Magog (the prophecy that “the children of Israel” will be victorious in the battle of Armageddon). That is what you risk.


Here is another warning.

The Shin Bet is the internal security service of Israel. It reports directly to the prime minister.

When the head of the Shin Bet goes public with a warning as copied below the situation is more than serious.

Shaiel Ben-Ephraim @academic_la - 18:30 UTC · Aug 22, 2024
Ronen Bar, head of the Shin Bet sent the most dire letter I have seen, warning against the emerging threat of settler terrorism. He believes it is supported by many in the system and is going to grow into a movement that will threaten the well-being of Israel. Here are the most important portions of the letter, as reported by Guy Peleg of Channel 12:

"I am writing you this letter in pain. In deep fear. As a Jew, as an Israeli, and as a security official, I learned about the increasing phenomenon of Jewish terrorism by the hilltop youth. The hilltop youth phenomenon has long created a significant amount of terrorism towards Palestinians.
With the deterioration of the security situation, and the inability of the police to enforce the law, and perhaps hidden encouragement from them, the phenomenon is changing and becoming more significant. From the work of individuals, it is now taken up by hundreds. There is no longer a fear of executive detention due to the good conditions they receive there.

Along with the money they receive when freed and the praise they receive from members of Knesset, alongside the delegitimization of security services. It has moved from secretive and narrow activity to open and large-scale organization. Sometimes, it is due to the use of weapons provided by the state. From avoiding the security forces to attacking them. From disconnecting from the establishment to receiving support from parts of the establishment.

The answer is not the Shin Bet. The Shin Bet is a band-aid designed to deal with a small group of extremists. It cannot deal with the root of the problem. What is needed is a coalition of navigators, including ministers, government departments, rabbis, and regional leaders. Without that, it might makes right.
The leaders of this movement attempted to bring the system to a total loss of control. We are on the verge of a process that will change our reality. The damage to Israel and to most of the settlers is beyond description:

Global delegitimization even among our closest friends.
Significant IDF forces are needed, and they are already struggling to meet operational needs.
Revenge attacks that will launch another front in the already existing multi-front war.
The entry of new elements in the terror cycle that were out of it.
A slippery slope towards lawlessness.
Difficulty in creating regional alliances against the Shi'ite axis.
Above all, it is a stain on Judaism and all of us.
Continuing in this direction will lead to a great amount of bloodshed and change the face of Israel into something unrecognizable."

The bottom line is that too many elements in Israeli society support Jewish terrorism. Meanwhile, the outcomes it leads to could undermine the existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. This is a crisis that must be addressed.


Original report:

Shin Bet chief criticized Ben Gvir's conduct in letter to Netanyahu and Galant, Minister demanded he be fired (in Hebrew)

After October 7 Ben Gvir, the Minister of National Security, bought 10,000 assault rifles for 'civilian security teams' in the West Bank. Those armed settlers are his private army. Ben Gvir is also in control of the police.

He orders the the police to hold back while his settler army commits pogroms against Palestinians. This while the Israeli army is busy fighting -and losing- on multiple fronts is a situation that is destined to become catastrophic for Israel.

It is what the ideologues want and what Moshe “Bogie” Ya’alon and Ronen Bar fear.

Posted by b on August 23, 2024 at 8:45 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/08/d ... .html#more
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Aug 25, 2024 12:08 pm

All US Military Bases Are Your Enemy
August 22, 2024

Image
A satellite image of United States' Al-Udeid Air Base located in Doha, Qatar. Photo: Noor/Iran Front Page.


By Nidal Khalaf – Aug 20, 2024

James Bradley, author of The China Mirage, says that “if you stood on the tallest building in Beijing and looked at the oceans and land surrounding you, you would find American destroyers, planes, and missiles encircling you from every direction.”

This image embodies the reality of US hegemony across the world, and the nature of the relationship between Washington and its adversaries on the planet. If we move from East Asia to West Asia, the scene is identical between the ocean and the gulf. US military bases are spread across more than 19 geographic locations between the Arabian Gulf and Eritrea. About nine of these bases are considered permanent bases, located in Bahrain, Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and the Zionist entity. Over the past decades, with each political juncture the region goes through, the United States doubles the number of its military bases and soldiers in the region.

Despite the enormous number of US soldiers occupying these countries through military bases (more than 35,000 soldiers) plus a huge stockpile of ammunition and military equipment, Washington’s military bases remain in the shadows of the political and intellectual debate that erupted after the Al-Aqsa Flood operation. Why are US military bases absent from our discussions? And how do we understand the present and future role of these bases in the region?

An “ignored” enemy
Bradley considers that part of the success of US hegemony in the world is what could be described as a policy of “obfuscation” or creating a “mirage” in how it spreads its military bases around the world. Despite the bases being openly announced, which are presented in the context of “joint defense” agreements with countries and regimes (most of which possess no sovereignty except a flag and an anthem,) the United States deliberately obscures, through its media and political influence, the role of these bases and the strength of their impact on regional policies and conflicts among neighboring countries.

For example, there is a plethora of news and analysis about Japanese-Chinese disputes, but rarely any mention of the presence of 85 US military bases and more than 52,000 US soldiers in Japan with advanced weapons and intelligence technologies directed against China. The same policy is followed in our countries. Screens are flooded with talk about the “Iranian threat” and “Arab states’ concerns.” But the fact that most US military bases in the region were established before the Islamic Revolution in Iran is never mentioned, meaning that the role of these bases in besieging Iran is hidden.

The discussion has shifted away from the reality and role of these foreign bases on Arab land and instead considers them a given in the Arab political reality. This is the essence of the intellectual normalization of the direct US occupation of our countries. Even the word “occupation” is absent from any discussion surrounding these bases. This deliberate “obfuscation” aims to force us to submit to Washington’s supposed divinity. As if the superpower capable of dictating our reality, security, and policies as it pleases, and securing its “interests” (what are the interests of the colonizer?) is simply our inevitable fate. Through this policy, Washington succeeds in extending its hand of killing and extermination to serve its colonial agenda while avoiding backlash against its occupations and brutality.

The biggest example of the success of this policy is the difference between the Arab reaction to the United States’ occupation of Iraq in 2003, and the Arab reactions to the US operations in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, and Libya after 2005. In the first instance, the blatant scene of direct occupation was sufficient to provoke diverse populations into expressing their rejection and condemnation through both armed resistance and other means. The latter instances, no less deadly for the peoples of our region, barely receive any attention or scrutiny. US occupation has become accepted as part of the region’s daily life, as if we have all acquiesced to Washington’s self-proclaimed “right” to bomb whomever it pleases, without the slightest objection.



The tool of obfuscation
However, the role of US military bases goes beyond the military, security, and intelligence dimensions, although this role is the pillar of US hegemony. All forms of cultural, economic, and political hegemony are merely symptoms of military and security hegemony. A closer examination of Washington’s military bases in Arab countries reveals an additional role for these bases, which is the media role.

Today, the most widespread and influential Arab media institutions in traditional and digital media operate under the protection of US military bases. This presence is not a coincidence, but a clear, well-defined role that entails a lot of role distribution while maintaining the main goal, which is to obscure the enemy. For example, since the start of the Zionist extermination war on the Gaza Strip, there are daily shipments of weapons from Washington’s Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar to the occupation entity’s bases in occupied Palestine. Shipments carrying tools of extermination are accompanied by pressure and threats against anyone working to stop the extermination.

But the Arab viewer will not see even one news item (even in passing) about the role of the Al-Udeid base in the extermination of the Palestinian people (and before them the Syrian, Iraqi, Yemeni, Afghan, and Libyan peoples.) Why? Because the media empire dominating minds and screens operates under the protection of this base and will not deviate—even by mistake—from the path of media propaganda for which it was established under the shadows of this US base. From here, we can understand the ease of the “hostility” that Al Jazeera shows towards Israel, in exchange for completely and deliberately obfuscating the role of US military bases in the war of extermination against the Palestinians (whom Al Jazeera claims to support.)

This contradiction between focusing on “Israel” while obscuring the role of other US military bases in the region grows starker as the battle lines become clearer, especially after the Al-Aqsa Flood operation. Today, as we approach a full year of ongoing massacre and persistent resistance despite starvation and siege, and while US and Western armies gather in our seas and on our land from all directions, it has become necessary to fully understand our enemy to make it truly meaningful. Hostility towards “Israel” alone was never sufficient to begin with. Today, limiting our focus to “Israel” alone amounts to participating in the crime of distorting awareness and enabling the continuation of extermination.

The magnitude of the Al-Aqsa Flood operation and the agony of the bloodshed in Gaza demands a correction of both our understanding and our political compass.

Know your enemy: all US military bases are your enemy.

(Al-Akhbar)

https://orinocotribune.com/all-us-milit ... our-enemy/

*****

"The Houthis have defeated the US Navy"

Tom Sharpe writes naval related opinion columns for The Telegraph.

How it started:

Image

The Houthis have become a dangerous rogue nation. The US Navy could crush them - Nov 10 2024
Marines, SEALs and hundreds of thousands of tons of haze gray steel are in the Red Sea

How it was going:

Image

The Battle of the Red Sea is intensifying and the US Navy is in the thick of it - Dec 4 2024
How long can the Houthis keep attacking shipping before something is done about them?

How it started:

Image

Britain must back up the US in the Red Sea Dec 31 2023
Deploying the HMS Queen Elizabeth would aid the overstretched US Navy

How it went:

Image

Britain literally can’t send a carrier ‘to replace’ America’s in the Red Sea - Feb 1 2024
HMS Queen Elizabeth is on standby. The Houthi threat is real – it's time to let go of our peacetime mindset

How it started:

Image

It’s quiet in the Red Sea. Too quiet - Feb 9 2024
The Houthis will presently have missiles again if they don’t already

How it went:

Image

In harm’s way and on the defensive: US and UK warships in the Red Sea can fight but cannot win - April 27 2024
The only nation that could end this by hard power has decided not to

How it started:

Image

Do we really need a Navy any more? - Aug 6 2024
You can learn any lesson you want to learn from the collapse of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet

How it's going:

Image

The Houthis have defeated the US Navy - Aug 24 2024

But the EU and France haven’t given up. They’re still fighting for freedom

Posted by b on August 24, 2024 at 14:28 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/08/t ... l#comments

******

The Cant About Israel’s ‘Right to Self Defense’
August 23, 2024

It is illogical to describe Israel’s actions in Gaza over the last 10 months as defensive, writes M. Reza Behnam.

Image
Smoke and flames billow after Israeli forces struck a high-rise tower in Gaza City, Oct. 7, 2023. (Palestinian News & Information Agency, Wafa, in contract with APAimages, CC BY-SA 3.0)

By M. Reza Behnam
Z-Network

Despite the countless atrocities, assassinations and violations of humanitarian and international law, American politicians and the corporate media recite ad infinitum the accepted talking point that Israel has a “right to defend itself.” From their distorted perspective, only the aggressor deserves that prerogative.

Israel’s claim to self-defense is never questioned. Although it has one of the strongest modern militaries (581 aircraft, including F-15, F-16 and advanced stealth F-35 fighter jets); possesses the latest air defense systems; stockpiles 400 nuclear weapons with delivery systems; and has the United States, the world’s largest military power, standing ready to protect it, we are to believe that Israel is in physical danger.

On the other hand, the Palestinians, most in need of defense, are denied that right. They are told to accept colonized lives in the Gaza concentration camp, to accept marginalization, injustice and humiliation forever; that they have no right to resist the Israeli apartheid regime.

And the United States and its Western proxies threaten the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hezbollah in Lebanon and others in the Palestinian Resistance for daring to challenge Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.

Even though the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), Palestinian Islamic Jihad and smaller groups have no organized modern military, no air force, navy, air defense systems, nuclear weapons and no Western allies to defend them from Israeli terrorism, we are to believe that they are a threat.

In addition, the U.S.-Israeli narrative concerning Palestinians and their regional allies is rife with contradictions. The United States and Israel can choose their allies, while Iranians and Palestinians cannot without controversy.

Hardly the Victim

Image
Sudden refugees forever, Palestine Nakba 1948. (Hanini, CC BY 3.0, Wikimedia Commons)

Israel is hardly the victim it portrays itself to be.

Its colonial expansion through the use of force began when it destroyed over 500 Palestinian towns and violently dispossessed over 750,000 Palestinians to establish an exclusive Jewish state in 1948.

It broadened with the 1967 Arab-Israel War, which led to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, including East Jerusalem, as well as control over the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula and Syrian Golan Heights.

The historical record reveals that for many years prior to 1967 Israel intended to seize the West Bank and Golan Heights. There was no military threat or safety concerns. The war was fought out of a desire to demonstrate Israel’s power and to achieve territorial gains.

Israel continues to seize Palestinian land and escalate expansion. Currently, as many as 700,000 Jewish “settlers” live in 150 illegal “settlements” and 128 outposts across occupied Palestine.

The mainstreamed popular Israeli myth of a small David defending against an Arab Goliath was shattered by the Gaza prison break of Oct. 7. A fantasy President Joe Biden and many in the American political class grew up on and continue to embrace.

The reality of Israel’s brutal siege of Gaza and the West Bank has also forced many Jews in the diaspora to recognize that Israel has not been their defender. To the contrary, the mixing of Judaism with Zionism — religion and bellicose nationalism — has fueled anti-Semitism.

Law Breaker

Image
Israeli military forces arriving to demolish the Palestinian community of Khirbet Ein Karzaliyah on Jan. 8, 2014. (B’Tselem, CC BY 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)

To become a regional nuclear Goliath, Israel has violated countless international and humanitarian laws. Tel Aviv has yet to confront a law it has been willing to obey or a country’s sovereignty it felt compelled to respect.

The U.N. Charter of 1945 and the body of international law enshrined in its conventions, treaties and standards were created to govern relations and to usher in comity among nations, and to insure the horrors of the Second World War were never repeated.

The Charter, for example, strictly prohibits the acquisition of territory by force. Israel, however, began violating it soon after it proclaimed statehood and again in its preemptive 1967 War.

As a consequence of the Arab-Israel wars of 1948-49 and 1967, Israel permanently occupied the land it captured and has not allowed the Palestinians made refugees by the wars to return to Palestine and to their homes.

Occupation is by definition temporary until conditions are such that the territory can be returned to its original sovereign.

Flagrantly, Israel has violated one of the most important principles established under modern international law: an occupying power cannot, under any circumstances, acquire the right to annex or gain sovereignty over any territory under its occupation.

Furthermore, Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 states:

“The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies” and prohibits the “individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportation of protected persons from occupied territory.”

Significantly, two principles of international law regarding the use of force are especially important to weigh with regard to Oct. 7 and its aftermath.

The Right to Resist Includes Armed Struggle

Image
Message on the walls of Deheisheh Refugee Camp in Bethlehem, 2006. (delayed gratification, Flickr, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0)

For Palestinians, international law recognizes that resistance, by all available means, including armed struggle, is a legitimate right for people under illegal occupation (Additional Protocol 1 to the 1977 Geneva Conventions).

For Israel, when an occupation is in place, as it is in the West Bank and Gaza, the occupier (Israel) cannot use militarized force in response to an armed attack; it can only use police force to restore order (1949 Geneva Convention, respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land).

Essentially, international law leaves little doubt — Israel is an illegal occupant. The International Court of Justice on July 19 said just that. In its advisory opinion it ruled that Israel should end its illegal occupation and that “settlers” be removed from all of occupied Palestine.

Repeated United Nations condemnations, reports and resolutions have not stopped Israel from defying the rules and norms which other members of the international community are bound to observe.

The United States and its proxies have enabled it to become the rogue state it is today. And in the process, they have made Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza possible.

Oddly, while Israel escalates its violent behavior in the Middle East, the United States has warned Iran and other Palestinian allies not to escalate.

In addition, in August, Washington approved an additional $20 billion in new arms transfers (F-15 fighter jets, missiles, tens of thousands of mortar and tank shells); thereby, giving Israel the green light to continue its war in Gaza and to regional escalation.

In this and in many other actions, the American administration has made its defense of Israel unequivocal.

Image
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei praying at the funeral for Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh on Aug. 1. (Khamenei.ir, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)

Since the assassination late last month of Hezbollah and Hamas leaders in Beirut and Tehran, Israel has anticipated a retaliatory attack. To mitigate that, the United States initiated on Aug. 15 renewed negotiations for a ceasefire.

To sabotage the talks, Israel escalated the war by bombing Gazans sheltering in ruined schools and living in tents. Provocatively, Israeli ultranationalists marched on the Al-Aqsa Mosque courtyard, reserved for Muslim worship, in occupied Al-Quds (Jerusalem).

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as he has done for 20 years, continues to relentlessly pursue his dream of dragging the United States into a war against Iran.

Interestingly, Iran, through its Mission to the United Nations, has stated that it would support a ceasefire recognized by Hamas. It has, however, also maintained its legitimate right to respond to the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, chairman of Hamas’ Political Bureau, and to Israel’s violation of its national security and sovereignty.

Iran is also keenly aware that if the assassination on its soil is left unanswered, it simply “whets the appetite of the Israeli occupation for more transgressions and aggression.”

It is illogical to describe Israel’s actions in Gaza over the last 10 months as defensive. Unfortunately, that is what many in the American corridors of power and Israeli-backed media have been doing.

The narrative has finally begun to shift. Voices have grown increasingly louder demanding that Palestinians have a right to defend themselves, to resist occupation and to seek liberation.

The worn-out “defense” trope used to protect Israel no longer persuades. It is time for it to be jettisoned.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/08/23/t ... f-defense/

Restoring Israel’s Rule by Fear
August 23, 2024

Failing to restore military or strategic deterrence, Tel Aviv is invested in restoring the element of fear that was breached on Oct. 7, writes Ramzy Baroud.

Image
Israeli soldiers in eastern Rafah in Gaza, May 2024. (IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

By Ramzy Baroud
MintPress News

On Oct. 25, Israeli politician Moshe Feiglin told Arutz Sheva-Israel National News that “Muslims are not afraid of us anymore.”

It might sound odd that Feiglin saw the element of fear as critical to Israel’s well-being, if not its very survival.

In actuality, the fear element is directly linked to Israel’s behavior and fundamental to its political discourse.

Historically, Israel has carried out massacres with a specific political strategy in mind: to instill the desired fear to drive Palestinians off their land. Deir Yassin, Tantura and the over 70 documented massacres during the Palestinian Nakba, or Catastrophe, are cases in point.

Israel has also utilized torture, rape and other forms of sexual assault to achieve similar ends in the past, to exact information or to break down the will of prisoners.

U.N.-affiliated experts said in a report published on Aug. 5 that “these practices are intended to punish Palestinians for resisting occupation and seek to destroy them individually and collectively.”

Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza has manifested all these horrific strategies in ways unprecedented in the past, both in terms of widespread application and frequency.

In a report entitled “Welcome to Hell,” published on Aug. 5, the Israeli rights group, B’tselem, said that Israel’s detention “facilities, in which every inmate is deliberately subjected to harsh, relentless pain and suffering, operate as de-facto torture camps.”

A few days later, the Palestinian rights group Addameer published its report, “documented cases of torture, sexual violence, and degrading treatment,” along with the “systematic abuses and human rights violations committed against detainees from Gaza.”

If incidents of rape, sexual assaults and other forms of torture are marked on a map, they would cover a large geographical area, in Gaza, in the West Bank, and Israel itself — mostly notably in the notorious Sde Teiman Camp.

Considering the size and locations of the Israeli army, well-documented evidence of rape and torture demonstrates that such tactics are not linked to a specific branch of the military. This means that the Israeli army uses torture as a centralized strategy.

Such a strategy has been associated with the likes of Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister. His aggressive statements, for example, that Palestinian prisoners should be “shot in the head instead of being given more food,” are perfectly aligned with his equally violent actions: the starvation policy of prisoners, the normalization of torture and the defense of rape.

Image
Israeli President Isaac Herzog with Ben-Gvir in 2022. (Kobi Gideon / Government Press Office of Israel, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

But Ben-Gvir did not institute these policies. They have predated him by decades and were used against generations of Palestinian prisoners, who are granted few rights compared to those enshrined by international law, particularly the Fourth Geneva Convention.

But why does Israel torture Palestinians on such a large scale?

Israeli wars against Palestinians are predicated on two elements: a material and a psychological one. The former has manifested itself in the ongoing genocide, the killing and wounding of tens of thousands and the near destruction of Gaza.

The psychological factor, however, is intended to break the will of the Palestinian people.

Majority of Israeli Jews believe prison rape suspects shouldn't face criminal chargeshttps://t.co/SW30UXyTkS

— Middle East Eye (@MiddleEastEye) August 18, 2024


Law for Palestine, a legal advocacy group, published a database of over 500 instances of Israeli leaders, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, inciting genocide in Gaza.

Most of these references seem to be centered on dehumanizing the Palestinians. For example, the Oct. 11 statement by Israeli President Yitzhak Herzog that “there are no innocent civilians in Gaza” was part of the collective death sentence that made the extermination of Palestinians morally justifiable in the eyes of Israelis.

Netanyahu’s own ominous biblical reference, where he called on Israeli soldiers to seek revenge from Palestinians, stating “Remember what Amalek has done to you,” was also a blank check for mass murder.

Image
Netanyahu addressing a joint session of U.S. Congress on July 24. (C-Span screen shot)

While choosing not to see Palestinians as humans, as innocent, as worthy of life and security, Israel has granted its army carte blanche to do as it saw fit to those, in the words of Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, “human animals.”

The mass killing, starvation and widespread rape and torture of Palestinians are a natural outcome of these shocking dialectics. But the overall purpose of Israel is not simply to exact revenge, though the latter has been quite crucial to Israel’s desire for national recovery.

By trying to break the will of the Palestinians through torture, humiliation and rape, Israel wants to restore a different kind of deterrence, which it lost on Oct. 7.

Failing to restore military or strategic deterrence, Tel Aviv is invested in psychological deterrence, as in restoring the element of fear that was breached on Oct. 7.

Raping prisoners, leaking videos of the gruesome acts, and carrying out the same horrific deed, again and again are all part of the Israeli strategy — that of restoring fear.

But Israel will fail simply because Palestinians have already succeeded in demolishing Israel’s 76-year matrix of physical domination and mental torture.

The Israeli war on Gaza has proven to be the most destructive and bloody of all Israeli wars. Yet, Palestinian resilience continues to grow stronger because Palestinians are not passive but active participants in the shaping of their own future.

If popular resistance is indeed the process of the restoration of the self, Palestinians in Gaza are proving that, despite their unspeakable pain and agony, they are emerging as a whole, ready to clinch their freedom, no matter the cost.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/08/23/r ... e-by-fear/

******

Why Lebanon’s Fragmented Society Must Unite in Supporting Hezbollah
Posted by Internationalist 360° on August 24, 2024
Janna Kadri

Image

The imperative for unity has never been more acute, as the stakes at this momentous crossroads transcend the mere survival of the Lebanese state and reach into the broader potential for restoring a just and enduring peace.

There is more at stake in betraying one’s own than simply standing on the ‘other’ side of history. One’s own, however, is not one with whom one shares a cultural identity of sorts. Cultural identities are fluid and can hardly be pinned down as a characteristic of a group without a heavy dose of arbitrariness. After all, it is capital or the political power in charge that empowers selected cultural traits politically to divide the masses. One’s own is not what capital empowers politically to rule – one’s own is the people with whom one shares the conditions for survival.

When people of different cultures, which is the natural state of things, do not own their means of survival and must work for moneyed incomes to survive, these same people gain more when united because they reap a bigger slice of the wealth they produce: wealth which is necessarily usurped by the rentier class as rent or profits and is then redistributed to individuals as individual wage, workers, as a matter of priority. One could imagine the case of Lebanon where the colonially imposed identitarians unite to increase their share of income from the total product and, subsequently, enhance the social and environmental conditions. They altogether earn more to live better and longer lives.

After all, it is not each individual who gains a wage, it is the working class that produces and thence earns a share of the total product determined by its political power standing at the bosom of the class struggle; why so? First, a person is usually a product of society like a father and a citizen, etc., and so that person is a subset of the society that invested in her and brought her into being. Secondly, imagine that we have the best machines, and we produce the most wealth, our share of that wealth will not depend on how hard we worked, but on how much power we exercise or how we control, since control is synonymous with owning.

So, at an ontological level, at the level of real survival as opposed to the hallucinatory identity that reduces the individual to few traits that separate him or her from such survival-reality, working people earn more if they unite and fight against imperialism and its instruments. One worker could earn more than another per chance due to hard work, but without working class unity his and other wages would be declining over time. In a nutshell, since the wage is social as opposed to private, that is, all of society earns and what it earns altogether depends on labor’s power in politics, it therefore must confront the owner class or the class in control, which includes inter alia the power of imperialism and its ally “Israel” sitting at the helm.

If anything, there is more to gain in struggle and in reframing class alliances in an anti-imperialist fashion than otherwise. This is a lesson frequently overlooked, particularly in times of crisis when the temptation of immediate gains obscures the enduring repercussions of anti-imperialist class alliances. In Lebanon, this divisive reality is all too familiar, as various sectarian groups have historically aligned themselves with “predatory classes”—foreign entities that seek to cannibalize the lives and resources of the South for their own gain.

Lebanon is easy prey since it produces little on its own and survives by vying for geopolitical rents in an process of auto-destruction. Sects and sectarians whose job is to devour each other in an act of self-emaciation re-empower imperialism on a global scale. The owner class or the imperialist class engages in the active destruction and consumption of the regions they exploit, and these industrial scale acts are paid/moneyed processes and generate returns by the degree of destruction they leave in their wake; how so?

First, the imperialist military and its NGO’s are waged war/austerity workers and, secondly, the once disempowered masses leave more of the global products in rents for the imperialist class. The prosperity of the North must be secured by the exponential annihilation of Southern lives; hence, the structural genocide on a global scale or people dying for trivial reasons way before their historically determined time. Although imperialists pursue the oil and other raw materials, little is said that there is no land without people and to extract the oil they must aggress the people. Sure enough, the extraction of life becomes an industry on its own. The process is ongoing, and the masses will naturally resist. People’s premature destruction sparks resistance. Franz Fanon once remarked that through a spiritual volte face, the masses turn their indigenous language and culture of submission into a revolutionary ethos with which they combat the imperialists – combat they must since their lives depend on the struggle.

A Call for Unity Against Zionism

Ten months have passed since the onset of the genocidal war on Gaza, and much of Lebanon realigns with the resistance. The Sunni-Shia schism has withered and the South, in particular, bears the burden of a whole nation. Still, some smaller factions inadvertently express their alignement with “Israel,” viewing Hezbollah as a greater threat than the Zionist regime. These are identity groups whose leadership flaunts the blood of their members for higher geopolitical rents.

Going by the premise of the ideas expressed above, that true solidarity and survival depend on the unity of the working class across cultural and sectarian lines, the war with “Israel” is a de facto war of existence. It will not end until imperialism is defeated. And huge masses of the third world will always invoke the Palestinian question as a focal point of resistance. In short or long term, smaller pro-Zionist factions will certainly lose in the process. In reality, such pro-Zionist positions are a kind of mass death wish since the struggle of the working class in this region will have significant Islamic/Arabic overtones and will certainly be a matter of survival for the international working class.

In a sense, such imperialist cronies produce nothing and survive by the avails of pro-Zionist posturing; hence, they are an incarnation of the settler colonial mentality and eventually go down with it. What is worse, one cannot wean people adopting the settler colonial mindset who live off the blood of the poor from the blood of the poor.

These pro-Zionist groups slander Hezbollah. Forgetting that the South has been constantly aggressed, Hezbollah has been systematically demonized in the mainstream media, often portrayed as an offshoot of Iran with the alleged aim of establishing an Islamic empire under Tehran’s tutelage. Some subjected it to various conspiracy theories bordering on the delusional, especially that it has a culture of death.

This narrative not only seeks to overshadow the movement’s political and social contributions in Lebanon, particularly among the marginalized southern population that has long suffered under occupation and neglect, but also aligns with broader US and Israeli interests by framing Hezbollah as a terrorist organization to justify policies of containment and aggression. Such demonization distorts the perception of some within Lebanon, but only those whose lifeline is the US-EU geopolitical rents.

Pro-Israeli sectarian factions internalize external narratives that frame Hezbollah not as a legitimate defender of Lebanese sovereignty, but as an alien force. The dichotomy alien and local is, like all dichotomies, a mental exercise, and here it is definitively a false dichotomy. By the ontological argument above, alien is that which fights alongside Zio-imperialism to reduce the share of what is available in the form of the social wage for survival. Any international anti-imperialist force is more relatively local/national than a village cousin in Lebanon promoting “Israel” as a democracy. Such internalization fractures social unity and weakens the ability to resist external threats, ultimately serving imperialist agendas that seek to prevent the formation of a unified resistance capable of challenging external exploitation and domination.

The unfortunate reality is that these divisive narratives lead some factions to tacitly acknowledge their perceived inferiority to “Israel.” In some instances, this mindset drives certain groups to portray themselves as victims of Hezbollah’s resistance, rather than recognizing the broader struggle against foreign domination.

“Whoever doesn’t support us in Lebanon, we ask them not to stab us in the back,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, stated on August 6. These words evoke the bitter memory of the South’s protracted years of occupation when the region was subjected to the relentless domination of Zionist forces. During this period, the South endured the full weight of oppression and violence, while some in Lebanon, either through indifference or tacit complicity, allowed this injustice to persist. The silence and inaction of these factions during the occupation only deepened the sense of abandonment felt by in the South, creating wounds that have yet to fully heal.

At this critical juncture, Sayyed Nasrallah’s words serve to remind that Lebanon cannot afford to re-enact the fractures of its past. This urgency is reinforced by the unprecedented reality that, for the first time in nearly a century, the Zionist entity is beginning to sense the contours of its own retreat. The imperative for unity has never been more acute, as the stakes at this momentous crossroads transcend the mere survival of the Lebanese state and reach into the broader potential for restoring a just and enduring peace.

One is reminded once more that “Israel” is the imperialist baton of the region and its demise is at the same time the condition for the reproduction of global society on better terms. Certainly, terms that do not mean that the premature death of the environment and man, the conditions of the law of profit that drives global accumulation, must persist in space and time.

Challenging Imperialism and Sectarian Divides in Lebanon

Hezbollah is not merely a political faction within Lebanon’s vast sectarian landscape. It embodies the understanding that resistance is an existential necessity—a vital act of self-preservation in the face of imperialism’s relentless onslaught. In an interview in 2014, Sayyed Nasrallah said out that our understanding of Islam is not merely limited to customs and rituals, many follow Islamic rituals but support “Israel.” For us resistance is in how we understand US and “Israel’s” approach to encroach on oil and the resources if the region. Such is development in theory based on correct revolutionary practice. How is this different from Chavez or Castro?

It is not theoretically plausible for either Iran or Hezbollah to harbor an expansionist agenda. In light of the balance of forces and the fact that imperialism expands by destruction, their actions are defensive and rooted in the imperative to protect against imperialist encroachment rather than seeking territorial control. Hezbollah’s primary focus has always been on defending Lebanon’s sovereignty and supporting regional allies in resisting common threats.

The narrative of expansionism is a distortion propagated by imperialist powers to legitimize their own interventions and maintain dominance in the region. This portrayal obscures the reality that Iran and Hezbollah are reacting to, rather than initiating, geopolitical aggression.

It is worth recalling that imperialism functions as an exploitative force systematically dismantling the social, economic, and political fabric of nations. It is characterized by the relentless extraction of resources, the subjugation of labor, and the imposition of external control over sovereign states.

This exploitation involves the erosion of local economies through neoliberal policies, the enforcement of debt that chains nations to perpetual underdevelopment, and the manipulation of social and political divisions to maintain dominance. Imperialism thrives on the disintegration of indigenous economies and the cultural dislocation of communities, where entire populations are reduced to mere instruments in the service of global capital. Its destructive power lies in its ability to transform entire regions into zones of conflict and deprivation, ensuring the flow of wealth from the periphery to the core, while leaving behind a legacy of poverty, inequality, and social fragmentation. In essence, imperialism is an engine of accumulation by dispossession, perpetuating a global order where the prosperity of a few is built on the systematic exploitation and destruction of the many.

In the case of Lebanon, imperialist forces have systematically exploited and exacerbated sectarian divisions to weaken national cohesion and exert control over the population. By deepening religious and ethnic fissures, these powers have thwarted the development of a unified national identity capable of mounting effective resistance to external domination.

This deliberate strategy has entrenched a political system marked by sectarianism, perpetuating corruption and inefficiency as sectarian elites collaborate with imperial interests. Economically, this manipulation has stunted development, consigning large segments of the population to poverty while enabling a parasitic class to thrive. Socially, the persistent reinforcement of sectarian boundaries has eroded the fabric of national solidarity, rendering Lebanon increasingly vulnerable to external interference. The lasting consequence is a nation mired in fragmentation, instability, and a diminished capacity to assert its sovereignty against imperialist encroachments.

The masses must come to terms with the fact that factions whose rulers pay allegiance to imperialism are deliberately aiming to weaken the resistance, thereby reinforcing Zionism. These allegiances serve to align local elites with the broader goals of Western imperialism, which includes the suppression of any effective resistance to Zionist expansion. By undermining the Resistance, these groups not only betray their own people but also bolster the very forces that seek to under-develop the region literally by banking on the shorter and more miserable lives the masses will experience if they lose the war.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/08/ ... hezbollah/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Aug 26, 2024 11:45 am

Against the Tide of Normalization: Yemen’s Movement Leads the Battle for Liberation and Rejection of Hegemony
Posted by Internationalist 360° on August 25, 2024
Ansarollah

Yemen's Movement Leads the Battle for Liberation

Image

As the Israeli regime, backed by the United States and supported by Western nations, continues its genocidal actions against the Palestinian people for the past 323 days, the suffering and injustice faced by Palestinians are only intensifying. Amid this grim reality, a recent report by Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics reveals a sharp increase in trade between Israel and five Arab nations during the first half of this year. The report states that the total trade volume between Israel and the UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Bahrain, and Morocco reached $367 million in June alone.

According to official Israeli data, the UAE topped the list in June with approximately $272 million, marking a 5% increase compared to the same period last year.

Trade between Israel and Bahrain saw a record increase, reaching $16.8 million this year—a staggering 740% rise from the previous year. Egypt followed, with a trade volume of $35 million, up by 29% from the previous year. An investigation by “Arabi Post” highlighted that five Egyptian ports have become key supply routes for 19 ships regularly transporting goods to and from Israeli ports during the aggression on Gaza over the past several months. The report confirmed that these ships exclusively shuttle between Egyptian and Israeli ports.

Jordan ranked third among these Arab countries with $35 million in trade, a 14% decline compared to June 2023. Meanwhile, trade between Morocco and Israel surged by 124% in June, reaching $8.5 million this year.

Shameful Positions

In stark contrast to these shameful positions, the leader of the Yemeni revolution, Sayyid Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, praised the decision of the Colombian president to ban coal exports to Israel to avoid contributing to the suffering of the Palestinian people. This decision stands in opposition to Arab regimes that continue to export fruits and foodstuffs to Israel. Sayyid al-Houthi also lauded a recent martyrdom operation in Yaffa, stressing that the resurgence of such operations is a significant and necessary step.

Furthermore, Sayyid al-Houthi highlighted that the U.S. airstrikes on Yemen’s Hudaydah province this week—five in total—are a reaction to Yemen’s naval decision to prevent Israeli ships or those heading to Israel from passing through the Red Sea. He noted that the United States is complicit in the atrocities occurring in Gaza and will be involved in any aggression against Arab and Islamic nations.

Drawing attention to the global community, Sayyid al-Houthi remarked that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu did not receive applause in Congress for his crimes but returned with increased military and political support to further his brutalities. Meanwhile, in some Arab regimes, individuals face imprisonment, fines, torture, and exile for sympathizing with the Palestinian people and their resistance fighters.

He further emphasized that it is unacceptable for the Islamic and Arab world to remain silent while popular protests continue in non-Islamic countries. He added that the driving force behind these global protests is humanitarian, while the peoples of the Arab and Islamic world share Islamic values, common interests, and national security with the Palestinian people.

Sayyid al-Houthi called for greater awareness, responsibility, and humanitarian, religious, and moral obligation among Muslims. He noted that in Yemen, this commitment is evident through the massive weekly demonstrations and hundreds of thousands of activities supporting Palestine.

He also acknowledged the Moroccan people’s ongoing efforts, which stand in stark contrast to the official position of their government, which he described as treacherous and complicit with Israel. The leader lamented the deepening economic cooperation between Morocco and Israel, expressing profound disappointment.

Escalation of Resistance

In the face of this reality, Israel is anxiously awaiting inevitable retaliation from Hezbollah for the assassination of Jihadist Commander Sayyid Fuad Shukr, from Iran for the assassination of the great Islamic leader, Martyr Ismail Haniyeh, and from Yemen for the bombing of Hudaydah port.

This fear is reflected in the suspension of flights by most airlines to and from Israel, and the significant impact on the Israeli economy due to the blockade imposed by the Yemeni navy, preventing ships from reaching Israeli ports. Israel’s anxiety stems from its awareness that the retaliation will be painful and significant, and its delay is attributed to meticulous planning and precise target selection.

Sayyid al-Houthi praised the ongoing efforts of Hezbollah, noting that even Israel has acknowledged its losses and the substantial impact of Hezbollah’s operations. He mentioned that the Yemeni armed forces conducted 21 operations last week using ballistic and cruise missiles, drones, and naval vessels, targeting 182 ships involved with Israel or violating the blockade.

Historical Resistance

Reflecting on Yemen’s honorable stance, Sayyid al-Houthi reported that since the beginning of the aggression on Gaza, Yemen has witnessed 652,175 marches, demonstrations, and activities. He highlighted that more than 432,000 people have participated in training sessions as part of a mass mobilization, expressing hope for even greater involvement.

He also noted that military parades and maneuvers have reached 2,292, with weekly protests continuing in the capital, other provinces, and rural areas, regardless of weather conditions. Even in heavy rains, as seen in Sana’a and Dhamar, the determination to continue is unwavering.

Sayyid al-Houthi emphasized that the Yemeni people’s actions are in response to divine guidance, bringing great benefit both in this life and the hereafter. He declared that the Yemeni people stand in a position of honor, and future generations will look back without shame, unlike many other nations.

With the Leader

The Yemeni people’s resolve aligns with the guidance of their leader. Each week, despite heavy rains, massive Yemeni demonstrations in Sana’a and other provinces take place in solidarity with Palestine under the slogan “With Gaza and Al-Aqsa… Jihad and Steadfastness Until Victory,” reinforcing Yemen’s commitment to supporting Gaza militarily.

One of the participants in the demonstrations at Al-Sabeen Square, under the heavy rain, conveyed a message to the brothers in Gaza, saying, “With our Quranic culture, we are uplifted by the downpour; these rains only strengthen our resolve and confirm that we are on the path to supporting Gaza. We assure our brothers in Gaza, ‘You are not alone; we are with you.’”

This commitment is further evidenced by Yemen’s unique military escalation, specifically targeting the heart of Israel’s strategic and geographic center, “Tel Aviv” (Yaffa), which serves as Israel’s social, political, administrative, and financial hub. The targeting of Tel Aviv represents a significant escalation, particularly given Yemen’s challenging economic circumstances under siege and aggression.

Arab journalist Abdul Bari Atwan expressed this escalation on his X account, stating, “This is a historic day by all measures, reflecting an unprecedented Arab victory by the Yemeni Arab army that shakes Israel, makes history, and brings joy to the heroes and their supporters in Gaza. For the first time in 76 years, an advanced Arab aircraft strikes Tel Aviv (Yaffa)… Hundreds of millions across the Arab and Islamic world celebrate this great victory.”

Urgent Questions

In the wake of Sayyid al-Houthi’s speech amid escalating crises and the ongoing suffering of the Palestinian people, the struggle for human justice and national liberation remains an eternal battle that transcends geography and identity. As the cries of oppression faced by Palestinians grow louder, new scandals regarding economic cooperation between some Arab regimes and Israel are coming to light.

This situation raises urgent questions about the strategic priorities of these states and their commitment to the positions of their people. As the secrets of normalization unfold, the Arab street remains in a state of growing anger. Are we witnessing an economic betrayal without justification, or is this a pressing call to reevaluate the values and priorities that should unite the Arab and Islamic nations? In light of the escalating massacres against Palestinians, it becomes clear that the Palestinian cause is not merely a local issue but a beacon of hope around which we must unite to confront the Zionist onslaught. What lies ahead amidst these drastic changes?

Raising Awareness

In this context, Sayyid al-Houthi highlights the role of the Arab Muslim citizen, from the Atlantic to the Gulf, as a concentrated and significant force in raising Arab and Islamic awareness of the importance of joint action. Particularly among the youth, who should become effective agents of change, launching larger solidarity campaigns with the Palestinian cause. Moreover, the humanitarian call grows louder, urging scholars, intellectuals, party leaders, and civil society organizations to take responsibility for combating this lethargy.

He pointed out that the million-strong marches in Yemen and other countries of the axis underscore the need to express a kind of unity that the Arab and Islamic world currently lacks. The solidarity demonstrated by the Muslim Arab people in Morocco and elsewhere highlights the urgent need to unite the Arab and Islamic nations in the face of the formidable challenges posed by the obstinate Zionist entity, bolstered by unwavering Western support. Let’s give Arab youth the chance to ignite movements of liberation from the poverty and humiliation imposed on them by compliant regimes. It is time to turn their suffering into a driving force for Arab-Islamic solidarity against common enemies.

New Horizons

Sayyid al-Houthi noted that the ongoing shifts in U.S. policy and the changing global stance on Palestine represent a new window for the Arab and Islamic nations to explore new ways of addressing crises. The victories achieved by the Yemeni army offer the Islamic world new perspectives for benefiting from the Palestinian struggle within a broader context of Arab-Islamic alliances. Even if not aspiring to such heights, they at least represent a fresh start for international cooperation against Israeli violations, a pressing call for Arab-Islamic unity, and a strategy that everyone must adopt to face the dangers surrounding the nations.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/08/ ... -hegemony/

*******

Sayyed Nasrallah Announces Operation Arbaeen: “Israel” on High Alert, Gaza Will Never Be Abandoned
Posted by Internationalist 360° on August 25, 2024
Al-Ahed News

Image

Hezbollah Secretary General His Eminence Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah delivered a speech on Sunday, August 25, 2024, addressing the latest developments in Lebanon and the region.

His Eminence began his speech by praising the immense turnout for the Arbaeen of Imam Hussein [AS] in Karbala, highlighting the significance of this million-strong commemoration.

He then expressed deep admiration for the unwavering resilience of the Lebanese people, especially those in the South, Beqaa, and Dahyieh, who have endured countless challenges with steadfast determination.

Reflecting on recent developments, the Resistance leader noted, “Weeks ago, the ‘Israeli’ army blatantly crossed all red lines by launching an attack on Dahyieh, which resulted in the assassination of Sayyed Mohsen and claimed the lives of several Lebanese civilians.”

His Eminence further declared, “We have named our operation today the Arbaeen Day Operation,” marking the occasion with a decisive response.

Reflecting on the Resistance’s strategic approach, the Hezbollah Chief noted, “The swift response to the assassination of leader Fouad Shokor was crucial. A hasty reaction could have led to failure.”

His words underscore the importance of patience and precision in the face of provocation, ensuring that the Resistance’s actions are both effective and measured.

Moreover, the Secretary General of Hezbollah discussed the careful consideration that went into determining whether the Axis of Resistance would respond simultaneously to the ongoing aggression.

His Eminence stated, “We carefully considered whether the Axis of Resistance should respond in unison, and we chose to wait to allow for the possibility of successful negotiations in Gaza.”

He continued, “From the first day of Sayyed Mohsen’s martyrdom, we were fully prepared to retaliate. However, as we’ve previously emphasized, the timing of our response is itself a part of the punishment.”

Addressing the broader geopolitical dynamics, the Resistance leader underscored the influence of external powers, noting, “The world is well aware that the Americans have the power to compel [‘Israeli’ Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu to cease the aggression on Gaza.”

He clarified that the Resistance had no strategic benefit in delaying their response, “particularly as the enemy [‘Israel’] remains in a heightened state of alert.”

His Eminence further elaborated the prolonged nature of the negotiations, saying, “It has become evident that the negotiations are protracted, and Netanyahu has begun imposing new conditions on the resistance in Gaza.”

He revealed a key strategic target deep inside “Israel”, stating, “We have identified a primary target for our operation deep inside ‘Israel,’ which is the ‘Glilot’ Intelligence base.”

His Eminence, the Secretary General of Hezbollah, outlined the strategic decisions behind the recent operation, emphasizing its military focus and clear objectives.

He asserted, “We determined that our target must be militarily significant and directly related to the assassination of our martyr leader, Sayyed Fouad Shokor.”

He elaborated on the significance of the chosen target, stating, “The ‘Glilot’ Base, located just 11 km from the Lebanese border and only 1.5 km from the ‘Tel Aviv’ border, sits at the very outskirts of ‘Tel Aviv’. This base is crucial for ‘Israel’s’ military intelligence, housing Unit 8200, the unit responsible for espionage and intelligence-gathering.”

Explaining the operational tactics, His Eminence revealed, “We made the decision to launch 300 Katyusha rockets, aiming to overwhelm the Iron Dome system for several minutes, thereby allowing our drones to penetrate their defenses.”

He further noted, “We also identified the ‘Ein Shima’ Base, situated 75 km from Lebanon and 40 km from ‘Tel Aviv’, as being within our operational target range.”

Regarding the timing and execution of the operation, Sayyed Nasrallah said, “The operation was meticulously timed to commence at 5:15 a.m. today. All missile platforms were operational without exception, and none were struck before the commencement of our attack. In total, we launched 340 missiles, surpassing our initial target of 300.”

He continued, “Every drone site successfully launched its drones, with none of the sites being targeted before or after the operation.”

His Eminence also addressed the “Israeli” enemy’s response and narrative, stating, “‘Israel’ is attempting to conceal the losses inflicted by our retaliatory operation”.

“The enemy’s narrative is riddled with lies, reflecting their perceived strength as the most powerful army in the region. Their resort to deception is a clear sign of their weakening position,” the Resistance Leader added.

He added, “For the first time in this conflict, we launched drones from the Beqaa region. Any injuries reported in ‘Nahariya’, ‘Acre’ [Akka] and other areas were caused by ‘Israeli’ interceptor missiles.”

He went on to dismiss claims made by the enemy, “The notion that ‘Israel’ targeted and destroyed our ballistic and qualitative missiles is entirely false. We had no intention of using them in this phase, but they remain at our disposal for future operations.”

Furthermore, Sayyed Nasrallah clarified, “None of the strategic missiles they claim to have targeted were actually damaged. We had evacuated all key missile sites well before the operation, leaving the enemy to strike empty valleys.”

Drawing a parallel to past conflicts, His Eminence remarked, “Today’s failure by the enemy is reminiscent of the ‘Qualitative Weight’ operation during the 2006 aggression. The enemy’s claims, as echoed by Netanyahu, of destroying thousands of missiles and launchers, are outright fabrications.”

He stated, “Only two of our rocket launch pads were hit after the operation had concluded, not before. The supposed military and security achievements touted by enemy officials are nothing more than lies meant to placate the ‘Israeli’ public.”

Elsewhere in his speech, His Eminence emphasized the precision and success of the recent military operation, despite the challenging circumstances.

He noted that the impact of the operation was vividly felt within the “Israeli” entity, particularly in “Tel Aviv” and at “Ben Gurion” Airport, underscoring this as a demonstration of strategic equilibrium.

His Eminence made it clear, “We will carefully assess the extent of the enemy’s efforts to obscure the results at the ‘Glilot’ base and other targeted sites. If the outcome of the initial retaliation meets our expectations, then our response will be deemed complete. However, should it fall short, we retain the right to escalate our response accordingly.”

He further asserted, “Today’s operation serves as a clear signal to both the Palestinian and Arab sides, strengthening their position in ongoing negotiations. It sends a strong message to the enemy, and its American backers, that any aspirations of silencing the support fronts are futile – despite the sacrifices, particularly on the Lebanese front.”

In conclusion, His Eminence reaffirmed the unwavering commitment to the cause, declaring, “Regardless of the prevailing circumstances, challenges or sacrifices, we will never abandon Gaza, its people, Palestine or the sanctities of Palestine.”

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/08/ ... abandoned/

(Once in my life I'd like to be called "His Eminence" but I guess at this stage of the game that ain't gonna happen.)

******

Egypt doubled Israeli imports since start of Gaza war: Report

Arabic media reports that several Egyptian ports have been transformed into ‘major hubs’ for trade with Israel since the Gaza war began

News Desk

AUG 23, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Getty Images)

Several Egyptian ports have been transformed into major hubs for shipments to Israel, according to a report by Arabi Post released on 22 August.

This comes following Yemen's blockade on vessels sailing to Israeli ports, which has significantly impacted the Israeli economy.

“Egyptian seaports have become major stations for many cargos and cement ships whose mission has been mainly limited to transporting cargo periodically to and from the Israeli occupation [state] during the war on Gaza,” the report reads.

Arabi Post monitored the activity of 19 ships via maritime data and “tracked the sea route of these ships … between Israeli and Egyptian ports.”

It adds that other ships were transporting goods to Israel, but these 19 ships, including an Egyptian one, were the only vessels transporting goods exclusively between Egypt and Israel.

“During the period in which we monitored the arrival of ships to Israeli ports, no ships from Arab countries arrived at Israeli ports except from Egypt, and there are other scheduled trips that will sail regularly between the ports of both sides in the coming days,” the report went on to say.

The Arabi Post report is mainly based on data regarding the activity of seven ports: two Israeli ones (Ashdod and Haifa) and five Egyptian ones.

The period in which Arabi Post tracked the ship activity is limited to the last three months.


Map of Egyptian ports and routes used to aid Egypt throughout Israel's genocidal war on Gaza.
Except for a few trips to Cyprus or other third parties, “most of their trips were between Egyptian and Israeli ports.”

The 19 ships include seven ships, six cement ships, five general cargo ships, and one bulk cargo ship.

The ships made dozens of trips delivering cargo between Egypt and Israel throughout the war in Gaza, the report adds.

“Over the past three months, the data showed that 12 ships (seven container ships and five general cargo ships) were moving between Alexandria, Damietta, Dekheila, Port Said, and Arish, and the Israeli ports of Haifa and Ashdod.”

Six of these 19 ships have transported cement to and from Israeli ports. All the vessels are owned by companies from Israel, Greece, the Marshall Islands, and Switzerland.

The report also highlights that Egyptian imports from Israel have doubled during the war in Gaza, citing data from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics.

Between October and July this year, Egyptian imports from Israel reached $331.6 million – as opposed to the $106.8 million during the same periods in 2022 and 2023.

Egypt is deeply involved in mediation efforts to reach a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinian resistance. The country has longstanding ties with the Palestinian resistance while maintaining close security ties with Israel.

Ceasefire negotiations are currently ongoing in the Egyptian capital, Cairo.

Tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, a majority women and children, have been killed by Israeli forces in the strip. Tel Aviv has been accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

https://thecradle.co/articles/egypt-dou ... war-report

Hezbollah carries out 'first phase' of retaliation, Israel imposes strict censorship

An undisclosed 'vital military target' was the main objective of the operation, which Israel claims to have thwarted

News Desk

AUG 25, 2024

Image
view shows smoke on the Lebanese side of the border with Israel (Photo credit: Aziz Taher/Reuters)

Hezbollah launched a major drone and rocket attack at over 10 Israeli targets early on 25 August in what it called the “first phase” of its response to the assassination of top military commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut's southern suburb on 30 July.

An undisclosed “vital military target,” was the main objective of this operation, according to the Lebanese resistance.

"All the attack drones were launched at the times specified for them and from all their [predetermined] positions and crossed the Lebanese-Palestinian borders towards the desired target and from multiple paths, and thus our military operation for today has been completed and accomplished, praise be to Allah Almighty," a statement issued by the Lebanese resistance movement said.

The movement said it fired over 320 rockets at sites in the Galilee, which served as a diversion to prevent Israel's Iron Dome system from shooting down the attack drones.


Meanwhile, the Israeli military claimed it carried out pre-emptive strikes that successfully thwarted a massive attack by Hezbollah after identifying overnight preparations for a major attack.

“Approximately 100 IAF fighter jets struck and destroyed thousands of Hezbollah rocket launcher barrels, aimed for fire toward northern and central Israel.”

The Lebanese resistance movement addressed Israel's announcements in one of its statements, calling them “empty claims” that “contradict the facts on the ground and will be refuted in a speech” by Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah.

Following the operation, Israeli media reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued an order banning press interviews with Likud ministers until further notice.

Additionally, BBC journalist Nafiseh Kohnavard reported on X that the Israeli government “issued a series of new censorship regulations for media that includes the damage caused by rocket attacks to ‘strategic national infrastructure or to military bases.’”


The Israeli military said some 210 rockets and some 20 drones were launched from Lebanon at northern Israel in Hezbollah's attack this morning.

Some of the projectiles were intercepted, while others impacted, causing damage and injuries. Many rockets also struck open areas, the military said.

Palestinian journalist Qassem Qassem noted that “The Hebrew media is currently exaggerating the size of the enemy army's ‘preventive’ strike, and the talk about destroying 1,000 missiles directed at Tel Aviv is ridiculous.”

Al-Mayadeen noted that “Hezbollah hit its targets despite the occupation's reliance on significant American intelligence and operational support. The resistance's response to the assassination of martyr Fouad Shukr succeeded despite Israel's full state of alert for over a month.”


Israel's allies have been scrambling to prevent Iran and Hezbollah from retaliating to the Israeli attacks on their capitals last month. The assassination of top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut on 30 July killed several civilians, including children.

Washington has expressed hope that reaching an agreement to end the war in Gaza could stymie an incoming response and avoid a larger-scale regional war. Yet ceasefire talks continue to yield no results.

Hezbollah has repeatedly vowed that it will not stop operations until the war in Gaza ends and promised a harsh retaliation to Shukr's assassination in the Lebanese capital. It has also refused any discussion on Lebanon's border situation until an end to the war is achieved.

"Our borders with Lebanon will change and will not return to what they were before the war," an Israeli military source told Sky News Arabia on 21 August, echoing months of Israeli threats to launch an expanded war on Lebanon.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hezbollah ... censorship

Israeli bombs rain down on south Lebanon after Hezbollah retaliation

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah is scheduled to speak on Sunday and refute Israeli claims of a preemptive thwarting of the resistance operation

News Desk

AUG 25, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AA)

Israel continued to pound the south of Lebanon with indiscriminate strikes on 25 August, coming after the first phase of Hezbollah’s retaliatory operation and the coinciding Israeli attacks on the Lebanese south.

Israeli warplanes struck areas between Markaba and Rab al-Thalatheen in southern Lebanon on Sunday, Lebanon’s National News Agency (NNA) reported.

Jets also launched “violent raids” on Wadi Hamoul, east of Naqoura, and the Tasheelat area, north of Alma al-Shaab and east of Tyre, with several missiles, according to NNA.

Israeli warplanes also bombarded the outskirts of the town of Zebqin, Teir Harfa, and Al-Jbeen.

Two people were killed in Al-Tayri earlier on Sunday morning, the Lebanese Ministry of Health announced.

One person was also killed in the town of Khiam, and several others injured in different areas of south Lebanon.

Lebanon’s Prime Minister Najib Mikati announced on 25 August an emergency meeting of ministers to discuss the developments over the past hours.

Mikati “invited all ministers whose circumstances allowed them to attend for further consultation,” NNA reported.

The prime minister said he is “conducting a series of contacts with Lebanon's friends to stop the escalation," adding that “what is required is to stop the Israeli aggression first, and implement Resolution 1701.”

He also confirmed "Lebanon's position in supporting international efforts that could lead to a ceasefire in Gaza.”

Hezbollah launched a major drone and rocket attack at over 10 Israeli targets early on 25 August in what it called the “first phase” of its response to the assassination of top military commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut's southern suburb on 30 July.

An undisclosed “vital military target” in the Israeli depth was the main objective of this operation, according to the Lebanese resistance.

Hezbollah:

All the attack drones were launched at the times specified for them and from their [predetermined] positions and crossed the Lebanese-Palestinian borders towards the desired target and via multiple paths, and thus our military operation for today has been completed… https://t.co/3xeQuvKqwv

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) August 25, 2024
The movement said it also fired hundreds of rockets at numerous sites in the Galilee and Golan Heights, which served as a diversion to prevent Israel's Iron Dome system from shooting down the attack drones.

Hezbollah (2)

"Third, the sites that have been successfully targeted and hit by the grace of Allah are:

1. "Meron" Base
2. "Neveh Ziv" Artillery Position
3. "Zaatoun" Base
4. "Zaoura" Artillery Positions
5. "Sahel" Base
6. "Keila" Barracks in the occupied Syrian Golan
7. "UAV"…

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) August 25, 2024

Meanwhile, the Israeli military claimed it carried out pre-emptive strikes that successfully thwarted a massive attack by Hezbollah, saying it identified overnight preparations for a major attack.

The Lebanese resistance movement addressed Israel's announcements in one of its statements, calling them “empty claims” that “contradict the facts on the ground and will be refuted in a speech” by Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah.

Exclusive information cited by Al Mayadeen confirmed Hezbollah’s initial phase of retaliation was "was carried out with the highest degree of precision and success," and targeted "deep inside the occupying entity, not on its outskirts," despite the Israel media blackout.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly ordered a ban on press interviews with ministers of his Likud party.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-b ... etaliation

‘Mission accomplished, for now’: Hezbollah

Hassan Nasrallah refuted the claim Israel pre-emptively thwarted the Hezbollah operation, calling it a ‘Hollywood narrative’

News Desk

AUG 26, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Ratib al-Safadi/AA/Getty Images)

Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah said on 25 August that the Lebanese resistance “reserves the right to respond” again against Israel if the results of Sunday’s operation prove “unsatisfactory.”

Operation Fortieth Day, as the resistance dubbed it, was “accomplished just as it was meticulously planned,” Nasrallah said, adding that Hezbollah will “follow up on the outcome of the enemy’s silence regarding what happened at the two targeted bases [Glilot and Ein Shemer], especially Glilot.”

“If the result is satisfactory and achieves the intended goal, we will consider the retaliation complete. If the result is insufficient, we reserve the right to respond until further notice,” he added.


“We are facing an Israeli intelligence failure and a failure in preemptive action,” Nasrallah said, refuting the Israeli claim that the Hezbollah operation was thwarted before it began. “The enemy did not thwart anything.”

He also put to bed Israel’s claim that thousands of projectiles were intercepted and that thousands of rocket launchers were destroyed, confirming that all that was needed were 340 Katyusha rockets – fired at several decoy targets in the Galilee and Golan Heights to distract and overwhelm the Iron Dome system.

“The significant number of drones” sent to target the two military and intelligence sites in the Tel Aviv outskirts “reached these two targets, but the enemy is keeping it secret.”

“The days and nights will reveal the truth of what happened there,” Nasrallah stressed, adding that “the Israeli narrative is full of lies and is similar to Hollywood movies, and this reveals the level of failure and weakness that the entity is experiencing.”

Several members from the Axis of Resistance came out in support of Hezbollah.

“Hezbollah’s operation confirms once again the change in the strategic reality of the entity since Al-Aqsa Flood ... The enemy has no safety from punishment, and there are no limits to the possibility of hitting it anywhere and from any front,” said the spokesman for Hamas’ Qassam Brigades, Abu Obeida.


The Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) said the operation showed “steadfastness in their positions and fulfillment of their promise.”

“This strong and effective response deep inside the occupation entity, which is still open, confirms that the resistance is capable, strong, and honest in its promise and threat,” Yemen’s Ansarallah resistance movement said on Sunday.

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf said Hezbollah “succeeded during the … operation in targeting sensitive military and intelligence facilities of the Zionist entity,” saluting the Lebanese resistance “the resistant people of Lebanon, especially in the southern suburbs.”


Syrian President Bashar al-Assad also praised all the fronts against Israel, including Lebanon’s front, during a speech in parliament on 25 August.

“The resistance in Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen are examples to follow on the path of liberation, dignity, honor, and independence,” Assad said.

https://thecradle.co/articles/mission-a ... -hezbollah
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:22 am

Hezbollah retaliates with drones, Katyushas, and narratives

Hezbollah’s precise military strikes and quick propaganda salvos didn’t only counter Israel’s narratives on its ‘preemptive ops’ on Sunday. It also redefined the rules of engagement, leaving Tel Aviv grappling with both immediate tactical losses and long-term strategic dilemmas.


Khalil Nasrallah

AUG 26, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

After 27 days of keeping all of Israel on a knife’s edge, Hezbollah launched the first phase of its retaliatory military operation in response to the assassination of military commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut’s Dahiyeh neighborhood late last month.

The timing of the strike was unexpected, targeting specific qualitative Israeli military facilities and symbolic sites, and coincided with the latest round of talks between Hamas and Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo and the religiously significant day of Arbaeen.

Hezbollah’s statements confirmed the success of its strikes, indicating that they achieved several strategic objectives, including reestablishing deterrence and long-term rules of engagement.

Israel’s ‘pre-emptive strike’ and Nasrallah’s counter

Meanwhile, in an early attempt at establishing damage control, Tel Aviv rushed to shape the narrative on Sunday’s early-morning events, touting its so-called “pre-emptive strike” as a military and intelligence success.

But in his widely televised speech that same evening, Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah challenged Israel’s shifting narratives point by point, saying that the true impact of Hezbollah’s response would be noticeable in its future strategies – not in the “lies” of occupation officials like Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Lebanese resistance’s Arbaeen Operation was conducted in two distinct phases. In the first phase, 340 Katyusha rockets – not the 8,000, then 6,000 claimed by Tel Aviv – targeted various northern Israeli military bases and barracks, including Meron, Israel’s primary air traffic control headquarters in the north, Neve Ziv, the Ja’tun base, Za’oura, the Sahel base, the Kila, Yoav, Nafah, and Yarden barracks in the occupied Golan Heights, and the Ein Zeitim and Ramot Naftali bases. The rocket salvo served one purpose – to act as a decoy, engaging Israel’s air defenses, while Hezbollah’s actual targets were struck elsewhere using a fleet of armed drones.

This paved the way for the second phase: an aerial assault deep inside Israel using a significant number of attack drones that struck at strategic military sites like the Ein Shemer base, a multi-layered missile air defense installation, and the Glilot base, home to the Mossad headquarters and Israeli Military Intelligence, often abbreviated to ‘Aman.’

According to Nasrallah, this target was “110 kilometers from the Lebanese border and 1,500 meters from Tel Aviv,” an unprecedented penetration of Israel’s strategic depth into the heart of the occupation state’s military assassinations and psychological warfare swat team, Unit 8200.

The complex attack – which mirrors Iranian tactics displayed on 13 and 14 April this year – demonstrated Hezbollah’s sophisticated military capabilities, executed with high precision to achieve its intended objectives. Despite Israeli denials and claims that it launched a massive pre-emptive strike to thwart the attack, Nasrallah says the sites were successfully struck.

The Israeli military censor immediately banned the publication and dissemination of any video and imagery of the targeted sites, so evidence of the strike’s success is likely to be found more in the future actions of the warring parties.

Outmaneuvering Israeli intelligence

Following a series of extensive raids across southern Lebanon early Sunday morning, particularly valleys and forested areas along the border and in parts of the Tuffah region, Israeli military spokesmen launched their narrative of a “pre-emptive strike” to halt a planned Hezbollah attack involving thousands of rockets aimed at “civilian” areas.

But that narrative was quickly undermined by Hezbollah’s execution of its planned attack and by Nasrallah’s detailed rebuttal. In his speech, the Hezbollah leader revealed that the hangars and launchers designated for the attack remained unharmed and were all operational when the attack commenced.

He further disclosed that some drones were launched from Lebanon’s northern Litani and others from the country’s Bekaa region, which had not been affected by Israeli strikes. This indicated a lack of Israeli intelligence regarding the locations of the munitions prepared for the attack.

Nasrallah also highlighted a significant intelligence feat achieved by Hezbollah. He recounted the efforts of Shukr, also known as Hajj Mohsen, who, before his martyrdom, successfully transferred rockets in a misleading operation that bore similarities to the “qualitative weight” operation executed by Israel during the initial 48 hours of the July War in 2006.

In that operation, Israel claimed to have destroyed 80 percent of Hezbollah’s long-range rockets, only to discover later that Hezbollah had relocated its rockets without detection. The revelations in Nasrallah’s latest speech about “Operation Arbaeen Day” suggest that Hezbollah may have orchestrated a disinformation campaign over several years, complicating Israeli calculations and undermining their pre-planned strategies for aggression against Lebanon.

This disinformation operation was further supported by Hezbollah’s “Imad-4” video, which showcased a highly sophisticated underground missile facility intended, in part, to demoralize Israel’s military brass and, in part, to challenge false Israeli claims that the Lebanese resistance fires its munitions from civilian areas.

Strategic and tactical outcomes

In a testament to the futility of Israel’s assassinations policy, Hezbollah has demonstrated that it not only maintains effective and secretive control over its military operations but that it continues to defy Israeli expectations at every turn. The Lebanese resistance also showed that huge US and western military deployments in the region do not hinder its ability to carry out strategic responses, though executing these responses remains challenging.

Hezbollah’s response achieved several objectives related to the immediate conflict and the broader rules of engagement established over decades of border confrontation. Importantly, Hezbollah reasserted the rules of deterrence that Israel sought to undermine through its aggression on Dahiyeh last month.

By striking targets north of Tel Aviv, Hezbollah challenged the perceived invulnerability of the occupation state’s interior, forcing Israeli security and military establishments to reconsider their strategies before taking any further action inside Lebanon.

Moreover, Hezbollah reinforced the principle of protecting civilians by limiting the conflict to a military scope, countering Israel’s long-standing tactic of targeting civilian areas to weaken resistance and force concessions, a strategy currently employed by the Netanyahu government in Gaza.

Tactically, Hezbollah succeeded in separating its response from broader Palestinian resistance operations. Despite Israeli and US hopes of severing Lebanese support following the Dahiyeh attack, Hezbollah has continued to support Palestinian resistance efforts.

Additionally, Hezbollah kept northern Israel within its range, increasing pressure on Tel Aviv, particularly as Hezbollah expanded its targeting of settlements.

Resistance Axis on standby

The timing of Hezbollah’s response, just before the Cairo ceasefire talks, provided some leverage for Palestinian negotiators, as demonstrated by Hamas’s firm stance on a permanent ceasefire and a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

The Israeli delegation, meanwhile, arrived in Cairo still reeling from the effects of the Glilot strike. Additionally, Hezbollah’s actions kept the Israeli military under continuous strain across all branches in the north, with the psychological impact undoubtedly seeping into the occupation state’s wider society.

While the current phase of Hezbollah’s response appears to have concluded, with Tel Aviv declaring the end of its “attack” and Nasrallah indicating a pause in operations, further action remains possible based on Israel’s next moves.

This leaves Tel Aviv under pressure, also awaiting potential responses from Iran, Yemen, and Iraqi factions of the region’s Axis of Resistance, which are likely to be on par with Hezbollah’s actions.

These developments restore the strategic dynamics shaped by a series of Israeli aggressions, with the resistance forces retaining the initiative through continued support operations aimed at maintaining pressure on both Tel Aviv and Washington to halt their war and atrocities committed in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hezbollah ... narratives

Political firestorm hits Israel after Ben Gvir calls for synagogue at Al-Aqsa Mosque

Israeli officials condemned the National Security Minister's calls as 'reckless' behavior

News Desk

AUG 26, 2024

Image
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, center, visits the Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem, May 21, 2023. (Photo credti: Minhelet Har Habayit)

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir’s calls to allow Jewish prayer at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in occupied Jerusalem, known as the Temple Mount for Jews, has caused a “political firestorm,” Israel Hayom reported on 26 August.

Ben Gvir made the comments in a Monday morning interview on Army Radio, also claiming he “would establish a synagogue there.”

Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem is considered the third holiest site in Islam.

Non-Muslims can enter the complex but are not permitted to enter the mosque.

Meanwhile, Jewish worshippers are allowed to pray at the Western Wall of the complex, which is viewed as the holiest site in Judaism.

Following Ben Gvir’s comments, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office issued a statement asserting, “There is no change to the Temple Mount status quo.”

“Prime Minister Netanyahu must promptly rein in Mr Ben Gvir regarding his Temple Mount statements this morning. His reckless words jeopardize Israel’s strategic alliances with Muslim nations, which form a crucial coalition against the Iranian axis of evil. His lack of judgment could have bloody consequences,” said Interior Minister Moshe Arbel of the Haredi Shas party.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant also criticized the National Security Minister. He said, “Disrupting the Temple Mount status quo is dangerous, unnecessary, and irresponsible. Ben Gvir’s actions threaten Israel’s national security and international standing. While his efforts yesterday to counter Hezbollah’s attack strengthened Israel, these declarations only serve to weaken us.”

Benny Gantz, leader of the National Unity party, condemned Ben Gvir in a statement on X. “No one expects better from Minister Ben Gvir, nor from the prime minister who allows this reckless firebrand to lead us to the brink for political convenience. But there are responsible elements within this government and coalition from whom the public demands action. Mere condemnations and platitudes won’t suffice – history will judge you for your part in this perilous course.”

On 13 August, Ben Gvir made a provocative visit to Al-Aqsa alongside Minister Yitzhak Wasserlauf from the Jewish Power party and Likud MK Amit Halevi. Footage showed Ben Gvir and others praying at the site. The Israeli police, which Ben Gvir controls as National Security Minister, failed to enforce government policy prohibiting Jewish prayer at the site.

At a July Knesset conference promoting visits to the site, Ben Gvir declared, “I represent the political echelon and the political echelon sanctions Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount.”

In response to Ben Gvir’s comments Monday, Hamas issued a statement, saying “Extremist Ben Gvir confirms his intention to build a synagogue in Al-Aqsa Mosque; a dangerous announcement and the Arab and Islamic nations must assume their responsibility to protect Al-Aqsa and the holy sites.”

The Palestinian resistance movement added, “What the terrorist minister Ben Gvir revealed this morning about his intention to build a Jewish synagogue inside the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque, represents a dangerous announcement that reflects the nature of the occupation government’s intentions towards Al-Aqsa and its Arab and Islamic identity, and its criminal steps that seek to Judaize it and tighten control over it.”

In September 2000, then-Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon toured the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound surrounded by roughly a thousand armed riot police. Sharon’s actions sparked protests by Palestinians that began the Second Intifada, or uprising, against Israeli occupation of Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza.

Sharon was hated by Palestinians for his role in numerous massacres of Palestinians, including in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon in 1982, as well as in 1953 in the village of Qibya in the West Bank and the Bureij camp in Gaza.

https://thecradle.co/articles/political ... qsa-mosque

US completes 500th air delivery of weapons to Israel since 7 Oct

The White House has sent 50,000 tons of weapons to Israel despite claims President Biden and VP Harris are working for a ceasefire in Gaza

News Desk

AUG 26, 2024

Image
US Air Force members transfer cargo to the IDF at the Nevatim Air Base on October 15, 2023. (Photo credit: Edgar Grimaldo/US Air Force)

The US military has completed its 500th flight airlifting over 50,000 tons of weapons and equipment to the Israeli army for its over ten-month onslaught against Palestinians in Gaza, the Israeli Defense Ministry announced on 26 August.

In addition to the weapons and equipment airlifted to Israel since 7 October, Washington has sent Tel Aviv 107 shipments of military supplies by sea.

A Defense Ministry statement said the shipments include “armored vehicles, munitions, ammunition, personal protection gear, and medical equipment, which are crucial for sustaining the IDF’s operational capabilities during the ongoing war.”

The weapons shipments – that have enabled Israel to kill over 40,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and render Gaza uninhabitable – come as White House officials claim that US presidential candidate and current Vice President Kamala Harris has been “working tirelessly” for a ceasefire agreement.

Muhammad Shehada of EuroMed Human Rights reported on 25 August that, according to multiple senior officials in Doha who were directly involved in the Israel–Gaza ceasefire talks, “There are currently no negotiations, only a sham theatre play.”

Shehada further stated that Israel and the US are only “negotiating between themselves” and that the US is issuing positive statements about the negotiations against the wishes of the mediators to deflect criticism from Vice President Harris during the Democratic National Convention for her role in supporting the genocide.

Shehada adds that another purpose is to “blame Hamas for refusing an impossible unworkable non-ceasefire deal to make it harder for Iran and Hezbollah to retaliate since they promised to hold fire as long as negotiations were ongoing.”

Following Israel’s assassinations of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran and Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut in late July, Iran and Hezbollah have promised to retaliate.

Hezbollah carried out part of its retaliation on Sunday when it launched over 300 missiles and drones, striking intelligence and military targets deep inside Israel near Tel Aviv.

The Hamas movement said in a statement on 25 August that its delegation left Cairo that day after meeting with mediators and being briefed on the negotiations by Egyptian and Qatari officials.

“The Hamas delegation stressed the movement’s position that any agreement must include a permanent ceasefire, a complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the freedom of return of residents to their areas, relief and reconstruction, and a serious exchange deal,” he added.

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-comple ... ince-7-oct

Palestinian Authority to attend BRICS summit, apply for membership

Russian President Vladimir Putin hosted PA President Mahmoud Abbas in Moscow earlier this month

News Desk

AUG 26, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: BRICS Business Magazine)

Palestine’s ambassador in Moscow, Abdel Hafeez Nofal, said on 26 August that Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas had received an invitation from President Vladimir Putin to attend the upcoming BRICS summit.

“We received an invitation from President Putin to President Abbas, and he was invited to participate in the BRICS summit prior to the invitation [to visit Russia] … but we will see if the prime minister will participate,” Nofal said. “The most important thing is that we [Palestinian representatives] will participate in this event,” he added.

The ambassador said Abbas and Putin have a good relationship with one another and can meet at any time.

“After our first participation in the BRICS summit, we will send a request to join this association,” Nofal revealed.

He also said that Putin promised Abbas that the upcoming BRICS summit in the Russian city of Kazan, scheduled for October 2024, will include a session dedicated primarily to Palestine.

Putin hosted the PA president in the Russian capital earlier this month.

Earlier this year, Moscow hosted the Palestinian factions – including Abbas’ Fatah party, Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement, and others – for national unity talks. The factions also met in Beijing last month and signed a Chinese-brokered reconciliation agreement aimed at “ending division and strengthening Palestinian unity.”

Despite deep and longstanding security ties with Tel Aviv, the PA remains under tight Israeli constraints.

It regularly has funds withheld from it by Israel and has for years been blocked from achieving statehood – despite international law. In July, Israel’s Knesset passed a vote with an overwhelming majority completely rejecting any prospect for Palestinian statehood, even as part of a negotiated settlement.

Foreign diplomats have even been punished for recognizing Palestinian statehood and prevented from dealing with the PA, as was the case with Norway earlier this month.

BRICS nations have condemned Israel’s actions against the Palestinians in Gaza.

In a joint statement released on 10 June, the bloc called for a quick ceasefire and the unobstructed delivery of aid to the strip.

It also rejected attempts at forcefully displacing Palestinians from their land and cautioned “against the spillover effects” of increasing tensions in West Asia.

BRICS has successfully enabled states targeted by harsh Western and US sanctions, such as Russia, China, and Iran, to cooperate with one another in trade, economy, security, and other domains.

https://thecradle.co/articles/palestini ... membership

Israel expands Netzarim corridor to include ‘permanent outposts’

The Netzarim corridor is one of several areas in Gaza where Israeli forces are planning to maintain an indefinite presence

News Desk

AUG 26, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Ilia Yefimovich/dpa)

Israeli forces have expanded the Netzarim corridor in the Gaza Strip to include four large “outposts” designed to permanently house troops, according to satellite imagery reviewed by Hebrew news site Ynet.

“The IDF has been working to expand the corridor … Four large outposts were established in the corridor, for the permanent stay of hundreds of fighters,” the Israeli outlet reported on 26 August.

Ynet explains that Israel recently launched an operation in Gaza City’s Zaytoun neighborhood, where Israeli troops have operated several times since the start of the war, failing to root out Hamas’ Qassam Brigades.

Four reservist soldiers have been killed in the operation, including one on Sunday by an explosive device planted by the Palestinian resistance. The ongoing operation in Zaytoun was launched specifically “to expand” the Netzarim corridor, which lies in close proximity to the Gaza City neighborhood, the report said.

“In the raid, the forces were required to locate tunnels, terrorist infrastructures and weapons of Hamas. The brigade raid continues, and includes hitting the terrorists and destroying munitions stocks that threaten the forces in Netzarim.”

The Netzarim corridor was established by Israeli forces during the early months of the war on Gaza. The corridor, which runs through the former grounds of the old Netzarim settlement, splits the strip in two and prevents the return of displaced Palestinians to northern Gaza.

“The corridor was established … to prevent the return of armed terrorists to the north of the Gaza Strip, and to generally prevent the return of Palestinians to the north of the Gaza Strip. Palestinians can move south – but not in the opposite direction,” Ynet explains, reinforcing the Israeli narrative that displaced Gazans returning to the north as part of any agreement are actually militants.

Israeli forces have set up a “newly constructed operational route … and a drainage point” along the corridor to prevent displaced Palestinians in southern Gaza from returning to their homes in the north, Ynet goes on to say.


The report further confirms Israel's plan for a permanent presence in the Gaza Strip. Israeli defense officials who spoke with the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) in February said the corridor is part of Tel Aviv's “plans to maintain security control over the enclave for some time.”

Israeli forces stationed at Netzarim have come under numerous attacks by Palestinian resistance factions since the corridor was established.

Satellite imagery analyzed by the Forensic Architecture research group last week revealed that Israeli forces are also working on a new east-to-west land corridor near Gaza City’s Beit Hanoun. Over the past several months, Israeli troops have destroyed Palestinian homes and farmlands to establish this new corridor, according to Forensic Architecture.


A photo that circulated on social media on 25 August shows that Israeli forces have built an asphalt road on the Philadelphi corridor on the Gaza–Egypt border in the southern strip.


The Netzarim corridor, as well as the Philadelphi corridor and Rafah crossing on the Gaza–Egypt border, are two of the main topics that have complicated ceasefire talks. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is insisting on keeping troops in these areas despite Hamas’ demands for a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza.

Netanyahu insists on a screening and inspection mechanism at the Netzarim corridor to inspect Gazans returning to the north as part of any agreement.

The premier also insists that any captive exchange be followed by a continuation of the war. As a result, ceasefire talks have yielded no results.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-ex ... t-outposts
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 28, 2024 11:13 am

The Unpublished Genocide Diaries of Refaat Alareer
August 25, 2024

Image
Refaat Alareer during the early weeks of the genocide, October 2023. Photo: Asem al-Nabih.

The following pieces by Dr. Refaat Alareer, the Palestinian poet, professor and beloved mentor who was murdered in an Israeli airstrike on 6 December 2023, have not been published previously. These pieces will also appear in If I Must Die: Poetry and Prose, an anthology of Alareer’s work compiled with an introduction by Yousef M. Aljamal and published by OR Books.

In addition to many other pieces, Alareer contributed to The Electronic Intifada two narratives about his experience during the ongoing genocide: “Israel bombed my home without warning,” published on 22 October 2023, and “Israel’s claims of ‘terrorist activity’ in a children’s hospital were lies,” published on 19 November 2023.

Alareer also appeared several times on The Electronic Intifada livestream, launched at the beginning of the genocide. During the first episode of the livestream, broadcast on 9 October, viewers and listeners could hear the bombs exploding in the background as Alareer described why Palestinians insist on fighting for justice and liberation in the face of Israel’s genocidal violence. Alareer’s last livestream appearance was on 1 December 2023, a few days before his death, but for only a few minutes because his electricity shut off and the connection was lost.

On 26 April 2024, Alareer’s oldest child, Shymaa, was killed in an Israeli attack along with her husband Muhammad Abd al-Aziz Siyam and their 3-month-old son Abd al-Rahman. The infant was born after Alareer’s death and was his first grandchild.


19 October 2023: In Gaza, we have grown accustomed to war

Horrific experiences of death and destruction have permanently impacted Palestinians’ culture, language and collective memory. “Is it war again?” asks my little Amal, 7, memories of the previous Israeli assaults still fresh in her mind.

The wording of the question shows the maturity she has been forced to develop. Last year, Amal asked her mum if it was “another war.”

Yes, it is war again in Gaza! In Gaza, we have grown accustomed to war. War has become a recurrent reality, a nightmare that won’t go away. A brutal normality. War has become like a grumpy old relative, one that we can’t stand but can’t rid ourselves of either.

The children pay the heaviest price. A price of fear and nonstop trauma that is reflected in their behaviors and their reactions. It’s estimated that over 90 percent of Palestinian children in Gaza show signs of trauma. But also, specialists claim there is no post-war trauma in Gaza as the war is still ongoing.

My grandmother would tell me to put on a heavy sweater because it would rain. And it would rain! She, like all Palestinian elders, had a unique sense, an understanding of the earth, wind, trees and rain. The elders knew when to pick olives for pickling or for oil. I was always envious of that.

Sorry, Grandma. We have instead become attuned to the vagaries of war. This heavy guest visits us uninvited, unwelcomed and undesired, perches on our chests and breaths, and then claims the lives of many, in the hundreds and thousands.

A Palestinian in Gaza born in 2008 has witnessed seven wars: 2008–2009, 2012, 2014, 2021, 2022, 2023A and 2023B. And as the habit goes in Gaza, people can be seven wars old, or four wars old. My little Amal, born in 2016, now holds a BA in wars, having lived through four destructive campaigns. In Gaza, we often speak about wars in terms of academic degrees: a BA in wars, an MA in wars, and some might humorously refer to themselves as PhD candidates in wars.

Our discourse has significantly changed and shifted. At night, when Israel particularly intensifies the bombardment, it’s a “party”: “The party has begun.” “It will be a horrific party tonight.” And then there is “The Bag,” capital T and capital B. This is a bag that is hurriedly prepared to contain the cash, the IDs, the birth certificates and college diplomas. The aim is to grab the kids and one item when there is a threat of evacuation.

The collective memories and culture of Palestinians in Gaza have been substantially impacted by these horrific experiences of war and death. Most Gazans have lost family members, relatives, or loved ones or have had their homes damaged or destroyed. It’s estimated that these wars and the escalations between them have claimed the lives of over 9,000 (it was 7,500 when I started drafting this last week!) Palestinians and destroyed over 60,000 housing units.

Death and war. War and Death. These two are persona non grata, yet we can’t force them to leave. To let us be.

Palestinian poet Tamim Al-Barghouti summarizes the relationship between death and the Palestinians that war brings (my translation):

It was not wise of you, Death, to draw near.
It was not wise to besiege us all these years.
It was not wise to dwell this close,
So close we’ve memorized your visage
Your eating habits
Your time of rest
Your mood swings
Your heart’s desires
Even your frailties.
O, Death, beware!
Don’t rest that you tallied us.
We are many.
And we are still here
[Seventy] years after the invasion
Our torches are still alight
Two centuries
After Jesus went to his third grade in our land
We have known you, Death, too well.
O, Death, our intent is clear:
We will beat you,
Even if they slay us, one and all.
Death, fear us,
For here we are, unafraid.


23 October 2023: Five stages of coping with war in Gaza
Our familiarity with war in Gaza has led us to develop a unique perspective and unique coping mechanisms.

We can identify five major emotional stages that Gazans go through during these grim conflicts. The stages are denial, fear, silence, numbness, hope, despair and submission.

This is day 16 and Israel has killed more than 5,000 Palestinians (many are still unaccounted for under the rubble), including over 2,000 Palestinian children, Gaza authorities tell us. More than 15,000 were injured and over 25,000 Palestinian homes were destroyed. And Israel says it is ready for ground invasion.

Stage one: Denial
In the early stages of a crisis, there is often a sense of denial. We convince ourselves that this time won’t lead to war. People are tired of the recurring conflicts, and both sides may appear too preoccupied to engage in warfare. As missiles fall and soar, we maintain a form of partial denial, hoping that this time will not be as lengthy or devastating as past wars.

No, this time it’s not going to be war. Everyone is tired of wars. Israel is too busy to go to war.

Palestinians are too exhausted and too battered to engage in a war. It could just last five days, give or take, we hope.

Stage two: Fear
Soon, denial turns to fear as the reality of another war sets in. Gaza is paralyzed as civilians, including children, are attacked by Israeli bombs. The pictures and videos of massacres, of homes obliterated with the families inside, of high rise buildings toppled like dominoes turn the denial into utter terror.

Every strike, especially at night, means all the children wake up crying and weep. As parents, we fear for our kids and we fear we can’t protect our loved ones.

Stage three: Silence and numbness
This is when Israel particularly intensifies the bombing of civilian homes. Stories are interrupted. Prayers are cut short. Meals are left uneaten. Showers are abandoned.

Therefore, amid the chaos and danger Israel brings, many in Gaza, especially children, withdraw into silence. They find solace in solitude as means of coping with the overwhelming emotion and uncertainty that surrounds them. Silence prevails.

Then numbness follows. As people attempt to protect themselves from the constant onslaught of distressing news, they grow indifferent. Because we could die anyway, no matter where we go. Emotional numbness sets in, as individuals attempt to detach from their emotions to survive.

Stage four: Hope
In the midst of despair, glimmers of hope may emerge. Even in the darkest moments, Gazans may hold onto the belief Israel might at least kill fewer people, bomb fewer places, and damage less. The most hopeful of us wish for a lasting ceasefire or an end to the siege or even the occupation. But this is merely hope. And hope is dangerous.

We hope that politicians will man up. We hitch our hope to the masses taking to the streets to reassure their politicians and warn they will be punished in future elections if they support Israeli aggression against Palestinians in Gaza.

Stage five: Despair and submission
Unfortunately, hope can often be fleeting, and many Gazans have experienced recurring cycles of despair. The repeated loss of life, homes and security lead to deep feelings of helplessness.

In the final stage, there is a sense of submission as Gazans accept the reality that they are unable to change the situation. That they are left alone. That the world has abandoned us. That Israel can kill and destroy at large with impunity. This is a stage marked by endurance, as Palestinians strive to adapt and persevere in the face of ongoing challenges.

These stages of war have become an unfortunate part of life in Gaza, shaping the resilience and perseverance of the Palestinian people in the face of unimaginable hardships imposed by the Israeli occupation.

27 October 2023: What it’s like when Israel bombs your building
I have six children. And so far we have survived seven major Israeli escalations, unscathed. We are an average family. My wife, Nusayba, is a housewife, I have two children in college and my youngest child, Amal, is 7. In Gaza, Amal is already four wars old.

We are an average family in Gaza, but we have had our fair share of Israeli death and destruction.

So far, since the early 1970s, I have lost 20 (and 15 last week) members of my extended family due to Israeli aggression.

In 2014, Israel destroyed our family home of seven flats, killing my brother Mohammed.

In 2014, Israel killed about 20 of my wife’s family including her brother, her sister, three of her sister’s kids, her grandfather and her cousin. And destroyed several of my in-laws’ homes.

Combined, my wife and I have lost over fifty 50 members to Israeli war and terror.

2023 war on Gaza
As the bombs fall and Israel targets sleeping families in their homes, parents are torn between several issues.

Should we leave? But go where, when Israel targets evacuees on their way and targets the areas they evacuate to?

Should we stay with relatives? Or should our relatives stay with us, whose home is relatively “safe?” We can never be sure. It’s been more than 75 years of brutal occupation – and over six major Israeli military onslaughts in the past 15 years – and we have so far failed to understand Israel’s brutality and mentality of death and destruction.

And then there is the fear of what to do if – when – we are bombed. We try to evade them. But how can you evade the bombs when Israel throws three or four or five consecutive bombs at the same home.

The big question Palestinian households debate is whether we should sleep in the same room so that when we die, we die together, or whether we should sleep in different rooms so some of us may survive.

The answer is always that we need to sleep in the living room together. If we die, we die together. No one has to deal with the heartbreak.

No food. No water. No electricity
This 2023 war is different. Israel has intensified using hunger as a weapon. By completely besieging Gaza and cutting off the electricity and water supplies and not allowing aid or imports, Israel is not only putting Palestinians on a diet, but also starving them.

In my household, and we are a well-off family, my wife and I sat with the children and explained the situation to them, especially the little ones: “We need to ration. We need to eat and drink a quarter of what we usually consume. It’s not that we do not have money, but food is running out and we barely have water.”

And good luck explaining to your 7-year-old that she can’t have her two morning eggs and instead she will be having a quarter of a bomb! (Israel later bombed the eggs.)

As a parent, I feel desperate and helpless. I can’t provide the love and protection I am supposed to give my kids.

Instead of often telling my kids “I love you,” I have been repeating for the past two weeks:

“Kids, eat less. Kids, drink less.” And I imagine this being my last thing I say to them and it is devastating.



Israel bombs our building
If we had a little food last week, now we barely have any because Israel struck our home with two missiles while we were inside. And without prior warning!

My wife Nusayba had already instructed the kids to run if a bombing happened nearby. We never expected [our building] to be hit. And that was a golden piece of advice.

I was hosting four families of relatives in my flat. Most of them were kids and women.

We ran and ran. We carried the little ones and grabbed the small bags with our cash and important documents that Gazans keep at the door every time Israel wages a war.

We escaped with a miracle, with only bruises and tiny scratches. We checked and found everyone was fine. And then we walked to a nearby UN school shelter, which was in an inhuman condition. We crammed into small classrooms with other families.

With that, we lost our last sense of safety. We lost our water. We lost our food and the remaining eggs that Amal loves.

We are an average Palestinian family. But we have had our fair share of Israeli death and destruction. In Gaza, no one is safe. And no place is safe. Israel could kill all 2.3 million of us and the world would not bat an eye.

The quoted verses by Tamim Al-Barghouti are from the second part of his poem “Military Communiqué.”

(Electronic Intifada)


https://orinocotribune.com/the-unpublis ... t-alareer/

******

Israeli airstrikes kill freed prisoner, teenagers in West Bank's Nour Shams refugee camp

Tel Aviv has warned of its intentions to 'significantly' expand its operations in the occupied West Bank

News Desk

AUG 27, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: X)

At least five Palestinians were killed late on 26 August after an Israeli drone launched several missiles into a residential area of the Nour Shams refugee camp in the occupied West Bank city of Tulkarem.


Local media identified those killed as Jibril Ghassan Jibril, Muhannad al-Qarawi, Mohammad al-Sheikh Yousef, Adnan Aysar al-Jaber, and Mohammad Alyan. WAFA News Agency identified the last two as teenagers, aged 15 and 16 respectively.

Furthermore, Jibril was identified as one of the prisoners freed from Israeli prisons in late 2023 during the only prisoner-exchange deal since 7 October. The Israeli army accused Jibril of carrying out several shooting operations following his release and arrested several of his family members to pressure him to turn himself in.

Several more Palestinians were wounded during the strike. Tel Aviv claimed one of its drones struck a “command room” for the Palestinian resistance in the refugee camp.


Hamas called the overnight attack “a desperate attempt to uproot the thorn of resistance that inflicts pain on the occupation through its qualitative operations.”

“We affirm that this fierce war waged by the occupation against our land and people will not bring the occupation security and stability. Instead, it will ignite the ground with fire under the feet of its soldiers and settlers,” the group added.

The Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) described Israel's increased brutality in the occupied West Bank as an effort to “shift the focus of its operations [from Gaza to the West Bank]."

It also said, “The increasing brutality and ferocity of Zionist crimes in the West Bank come as part of the [occupying] entity's attempt to cover up its failures” in Gaza and elsewhere.

Hours before the strike, Israeli security officials told Channel 14 News about plans to “raise the level of operations” in the occupied West Bank.

“Despite the importance of all the other fronts, the West Bank arena worries us greatly. We are preparing to raise the level of operations in this area, perhaps significantly, to crush the terrorism that endangers the citizens of Israel.”

Settler pogroms have also intensified across the occupied West Bank. On Monday, mobs of settlers raided the village of Wadi Rahhal near the city of Bethlehem, killing 37-year-old Khalil Salem Ziada and wounding at least four others.

Since the start of the year, Israeli settlers have carried out 1,334 attacks and pogroms across the West Bank, killing at least seven Palestinians, according to WAFA. In total, over 650 Palestinians have been killed by the Israeli army and settler mobs since 7 October.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... fugee-camp

Palestinian detainees electrocuted, raped with rifles by Israeli soldiers: HRW

Reports continue to emerge of Israeli soldiers torturing and raping Palestinians in Gaza and at detention centers in Israel

News Desk

AUG 27, 2024

Image
Photo provided by Israeli organization Breaking The Silence shows Palestinian prisoners captured in the Gaza Strip at a detention facility on the Sde Teiman military base.(Photo credit: Breaking the Silence via AP)

Israeli troops are torturing Palestinians from Gaza, including through the use of electric shocks and anal rape using M-16 rifle butts, according to the testimony of a Palestinian medic published by Human Rights Watch (HRW) on 27 August.

Walid Khalili, a Palestinian paramedic and ambulance driver, was abducted by Israeli soldiers in Gaza in November and taken to the Sde Teiman and Negev (Al-Naqab) detention centers in Israel.

Israeli troops abducted Khalili after he was dispatched to the Tal al-Hawa neighborhood of Gaza City to rescue four wounded men.

When he arrived, he saw Israeli troops execute the men on Mughrabi Street, near the Labor Ministry building.

“I saw the four men being executed in cold blood,” Khalili said. “I saw it with my own eyes, I was three meters away. When they were shot, I hid under the ambulance, and next to it there was a building, so then I ran inside the building. The Israeli forces raided the building and started yelling at me to raise my hands.”

Soldiers kicked and beat Khalili with their rifle butts, breaking his ribs, before transferring him to the Sde Teiman facility in southern Israel.

HRW writes that Israeli soldiers dragged him on the ground, removed the cuffs on his ankles, and dressed him in adult diapers. They then took him to a warehouse where dozens of detainees, also in diapers, were suspended from the ceiling, with the chains attached to their square metal handcuffs.

Khalili said he was suspended from a chain so his feet would not touch the ground. The soldiers dressed him in a garment and a headband attached to wires. They shocked him with electricity and threw cold water on him every second day.

He told HRW, “The world was spinning around, and I fainted. They hit me with batons. I kept fainting and hallucinating. He kept asking me about the hostages, and moving Hamas hostages, and where I was on October 7. With every question I was electro-shocked to wake me up. He told me confess and we will stop torturing you.”

Every three days, he was taken to a new location and given an unknown drug in pill form before being interrogated further.

“The pill made me feel weird, it was the first time I have felt like this, as if my inner mind was speaking what was in my heart, not me. I felt like I’m flying. I saw hallucinations.”

An Arabic-speaking Israeli guard interrogated him, asking him about the captives taken by Hamas to Gaza on 7 October. Khalili said the interrogator knew “how many children I have, all their names, my address,” and threatened they would be killed if he did not confess.

Khalili was later taken to the Negev base in southern Israel. He was held there with another Palestinian detainee from Gaza who was visibly “bleeding from his bottom.” The man told Khalili how “three soldiers took turns raping him with an M16 [assault rifle]” before he was brought to the detention center.

“He was terrified. His mental health was awful, he started talking to himself,” Khalili said.

The sexual assault of Palestinian detainees gained media attention in Israel after five soldiers were detained earlier this month after raping a Palestinian man with a cell phone in Sde Teiman. CCTV video of the rape was also published by Israeli Channel 12.


The detention of the soldiers by military police resulted in widespread anger among Israeli politicians, settler activists, and media personalities, who argued that any treatment of alleged Hamas fighters is legitimate, including rape.

On 27 August, Channel 14 hosted one of the Sde Teiman guards accused of raping Palestinians on one of its programs. The soldier stated, “The military police treated us really nice... You see the support … With a hand on their heart, like, telling you ‘thank you’!”

https://thecradle.co/articles/palestini ... ldiers-hrw

Israel buys up Google Ads to expand smear campaign against UNRWA: Report

UNRWA USA has spent tens of thousands of dollars on ad slots in an attempt to outbid the Israeli government, which is trying to stifle funding for the UN agency

News Desk

AUG 27, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AFP via Getty Images).

The Israeli government has paid for a Google advertising campaign pushing Tel Aviv’s allegations that the UN agency for Palestinian refugees is linked to “terrorism” and was involved in Hamas’ Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, according to a WIRED report.

The US-based tech magazine reported on 26 August that Israel has bought advertising that pops up when the terms UNRWA or UNRWA USA are searched in a bid to “draw potential donors to a webpage full of allegations about why the UNRWA couldn’t be trusted.”

“The anti-UNRWA campaign is just one volley of ads that Israel has orchestrated in recent months that have drawn complaints both inside and outside of the company,” several current and former Google employees told WIRED.

It shows “the delicate relationship Google has kept with its advertising client, Israel, and the limits of the company’s policing of alleged misinformation in ads,” WIRED wrote.

Analytics show that between May and July, when users searched more than 300 terms linked to the top UN agency. the Israeli-funded ads came up 44 percent of the time they were meant to appear, while UNRWA USA ads were shown 34 percent of the time.

Israel has also aired ads in the US via Google, reading “UNRWA is inseparable from Hamas” and “keeps employing terrorists.”

“There is an incredibly powerful campaign to dismantle UNRWA. I want the public to know what’s happening and the insidious nature of it, especially at a time when civilian lives are under attack in Gaza,” said Mara Kronenfeld, Executive Director of UNRWA USA, which has spent tens of thousands of dollars trying to outbid Israel for the ad slots.

Following 7 October, Israel accused UNRWA of being involved in Operation Al-Aqsa Flood. The UN Office of Oversight Services (OIOS) launched a probe into the allegations earlier this year, releasing its findings in early August on the allegations.

“In one case, no evidence was obtained by OIOS to support the allegations of the staff member’s involvement, while in nine other cases, the evidence obtained by OIOS was insufficient to support the staff members’ involvement,” the UN office said. “With respect to the remaining nine cases, the evidence obtained by OIOS indicated that the UNRWA staff members may have been involved in the 7 October attacks.”

It added that “OIOS was not able to independently authenticate information used by Israel to support the allegations.”

UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini said in early August that the nine staff members would be terminated.

UNRWA has supported Palestinian refugees and internally displaced Palestinians since 1950 with education, health care, and other services. The majority of its employees in Gaza are Palestinian.

Hundreds of UN staff members and their family members have been killed by the Israeli army in Gaza, the UN said last month. Over 200 of them had been UNRWA members.

Israel’s ad campaign against the agency further threatens its funding deficit and hinders its work in supporting Palestinians afflicted by the war on Gaza.

The report comes as tech and social media giants increasingly crack down on pro-Palestinian content.

Israel has been successful in controlling and censoring information on social media apps, including Instagram, Facebook, X, and TikTok, via the lobbying of the Cyberwell NGO, which has extensive links to Israeli intelligence.

Washington has also used such platforms to reinforce its hegemony in the region.

In an ad that appeared on the Lebanese server of the Tinder dating app, the US army wrote a message in Arabic saying, “Do not take up arms against the United States or its partners,” and that the US “will protect its partners in the face of threats from the Iranian regime and its proxies.”

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-bu ... rwa-report

Netanyahu accused of blocking ceasefire talks again with ‘outdated, unacceptable’ Netzarim plan

The prime minister insisted on sending Israel’s team to present the plan despite them having rejected it months ago

News Desk

AUG 27, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: MTI)

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tasked the Israeli negotiating team with presenting his plan for the Netzarim corridor in Gaza to mediators in Cairo – despite it having been rejected months ago, Hebrew media reported on 27 August.

Security sources told Ynet on Tuesday that Netanyahu tasked the team this week “with presenting in Cairo the outline he accepted for solving the Netzarim axis issue, the exact same idea that had already been rejected in the past.”

This plan includes “digging trenches across the axes that cross Netzarim from north to south in a way that would not allow the passage of vehicles, and diverting vehicles that request to cross to the east, towards the perimeter, where they will pass an inspection and enter the north.”

The proposal for Netzarim was taken off the table months ago for several reasons, the report added.

Among these reasons are how long it would take to implement, its hindrance to the Palestinian movement, and “above all – there is no chance that it will be accepted by Hamas, or the mediators.”

“The negotiating team has already told Netanyahu that they strongly oppose this proposal, but the Prime Minister insisted that it be forwarded to the mediators – who, as expected, rejected it outright,” Ynet said.

A source in the negotiating team told the Hebrew outlet that “if we resolve one clause [of the ceasefire proposal] … Netanyahu brings another.”

The report also highlights how the negotiating team has been restricted by Netanyahu, further complicating the deal.

The Israeli team headed to Cairo on Sunday. Hamas has opted out of the talks and is demanding a return to a 2 July proposal based on an outline announced by Joe Biden in late May.

The Israeli premier has been insisting on keeping forces stationed at the corridor despite Hamas demands for a full withdrawal from Gaza. Netzarim was established by Israeli forces at the start of the war to hinder the return of displaced Palestinians to northern Gaza.

The prime minister has also set a condition for a mechanism to inspect displaced Gazans returning to the north.

Netanyahu also insists on continued Israeli troop presence on the Gaza–Egypt border and is working to establish yet another land corridor near Gaza City – indicating Tel Aviv’s goal for a long-term presence in the strip.

Ynet reported on Monday that Israeli forces have expanded the Netzarim corridor to include four large “outposts” designed to permanently house troops.

https://thecradle.co/articles/netanyahu ... zarim-plan

******

Israel’s Overreach: The Perils of Ignoring Power Limits
Posted by Internationalist 360° on August 27, 2024
Mohamad Hasan Sweidan

Image

Israel’s prolonged multi-front aggression and its utter dependence on US support expose the perilous consequences of power overreach. Tel Aviv is left dangling in the wind with a sledgehammer, but no strategy to climb down.

In the study of international relations, one of the most important threats to nations arises from an internal lack of awareness about their limits of power. A nation-state’s power projection is ultimately defined by key factors – military, economic, technological, diplomatic, and political reach – that are measurable and have inherent limitations.

This principle has led retired Israeli Colonel Gur Laish, former senior director for National Security Strategy at Israel’s National Security Council, to issue a stark warning. In a paper published on 19 August by the Begin-Sadat Center for Israeli Strategic Studies, Laish cautions Israeli leaders against embracing a new security doctrine that overlooks its limitations.

Israel’s strengths

Israel undeniably ranks among the world’s most formidable military powers, providing the occupation state with a strategic advantage over its regional adversaries. Its armed forces are ranked 15th globally and have received over $130 billion in support from the US, its irreplaceable ally in international affairs.

Economically, Israel is also a significant player. In 2023, The Economist ranked Israel fourth among developed countries for economic success. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated Israel’s GDP to be $564 billion and its per capita GDP to be $58,270, putting it at 13th worldwide. Since its founding, Israel has received nearly $330 billion in foreign aid from the US, bolstering its economic dominance.

Technologically, Tel Aviv also stands out on the global stage. The Global Innovation Index 2023 ranks Israel 14th out of 132 economies. Within the high-income group of 50 economies, Israel is ranked 13th and holds the top spot among 18 countries in North Africa and West Asia. The Global Startup Ecosystem Index 2024 also ranks Israel third globally and first regionally, underscoring its technological prowess.

Diplomatically and politically, Israel benefits from unwavering US support, allowing it impunity from many international laws and norms. Washington has used its veto power in the UN Security Council 89 times, more than half of which have been to block resolutions critical of the occupation state.

Since 1945, out of 36 draft resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine, 34 were vetoed by the US, effectively shielding Israel from accountability for its actions. The US has also played a pivotal role in Israel’s diplomatic achievements, including normalization agreements with Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994) and, more recently, the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco (2020), with ongoing efforts toward Saudi–Israeli normalization.

Dependence on Washington: A double-edged sword

Israel’s superiority in all these fields is closely tied to continuous US support, which also reveals a critical vulnerability. Dependence on Washington necessitates Israel’s alignment with western policies, which has led Israeli elites to caution against straining US–Israel relations.

Retired colonel Benina Sharvit Baruch highlights this point in an article for the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). She notes that Israel’s integration into the international system is under threat, especially in light of the ongoing Gaza war, which has significantly damaged its global standing. Baruch warns that failing to counteract this trend could further undermine Israel’s spiraling economy, national security, and military objectives. Just last week, former ombudsman of the Israeli army, reserve General Yitzhak Brik, said the occupation entity “faces collapse in less than a year” if the war of attrition continues.

In another piece, the INSS also stresses that the US-Israel strategic alliance is contingent on shared values:

Israel’s strategic importance to the United States is relevant only as long as the shared values are safeguarded. At this time, the special relations are in danger, especially given the widening gaps on the perception of democracy, Israeli policy on the Palestinian issue, and the growing alienation between the American Jewish community and the State of Israel.

Indicators that Israel is reaching its limits

Beyond its dependency on US support, Israel’s military engagements, particularly in Gaza, have exposed the constraints of Tel Aviv’s power projection. Ten months into Israel’s brutal military assault on the besieged strip, the Palestinian resistance is still able to target Tel Aviv.

History shows that states that ignore their limitations often face decline. In his seminal work, Politics Among Nations, Hans Morgenthau argues for a balance between power and policy, warning that excessive force disrupts this equilibrium, leading to instability and potential decline.

Similarly, Paul Kennedy’s The Rise and Fall of Great Powers illustrates “imperial overstretch,” where ambitions exceed capabilities and precipitate decline. A recent example is the constrained ability of the US to support multiple fronts, evidenced by its diminished focus on Ukraine following the outbreak of the Gaza war.

Several indicators suggest that Israel, by continuing its war in Gaza, may be approaching the limits of its power. For starters, economic strain is becoming evident despite Israel’s historically strong economy. In the last quarter of 2023, Israel’s GDP contracted by about 20 percent compared to the previous year.

There was also a significant decrease in consumption by 27 percent, and investment fell dramatically by 70 percent. The war has disabled approximately 18 percent of Israel’s workforce, with 250,000 civilians displaced and four percent of the workforce called up as reservists.

In response, the occupation state plans to increase military spending from four percent to six or seven percent of GDP by the decade’s end. This increase in military spending comes as the global economy is already under strain, and the US is less capable of providing the same financial support as in the past.

In addition to the economic strain, there has been a failure to achieve the military objectives outlined at the onset of the conflict. Last month, the New York Times reported that, despite ongoing military operations, the Israeli leadership is considering a ceasefire in Gaza that would leave Hamas in control.

This shift in strategy is seen as a concession, acknowledging that the complete destruction of Hamas, the war’s primary goal, is not feasible. In June, Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Hagari candidly admitted that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s stated policy of eliminating Hamas was unrealistic, describing it as “throwing sand in the eye of the public” and adding:

Hamas is an idea. Anyone who thinks we can eliminate Hamas is wrong.

Concerns are also mounting over a second major front with Lebanon, a development that has now become a reality. Since 8 October 2023, Tel Aviv has adopted a cautious strategy to avoid broadening the conflict, aware that its military forces are already heavily committed in Gaza.

‘Boiling a frog’

In accordance with Iran’s grand strategy, the prolonged conflict has drained the Israeli military’s resources, making it hesitant to engage in a new confrontation without significant US support. The deployment of US naval fleets in the region, intended to deter any potential response from Iran, Lebanon, or Yemen, highlights Israel’s dependence on American military support. This dependency reveals Israel’s current inability to manage multiple fronts independently.

Furthermore, Israel’s heavy reliance on US support limits its autonomy and increases its vulnerability to shifts in American foreign policy. This dependency extends across economic, political, and military dimensions, further constraining Tel Aviv’s ability to act independently.

This week, Israel’s Defense Ministry announced that the US military has completed its 500th flight, airlifting over 50,000 tons of weapons and equipment to the occupation army. In addition to the reinforcements airlifted to Israel since 7 October, Washington has sent Tel Aviv 107 shipments of military supplies by sea.

Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah claimed in a speech late last year that Israel’s munitions stock had been largely depleted in the first month of its Gaza assault and that the occupation army was almost entirely reliant on arms transfers from its allies, primarily the United States.

What would happen if that pipeline of weapons halted or if it suffered major production delays?

For Colonel Laish, Israel’s traditional approach of rapid, decisive conflicts is being replaced by a strategy that accepts prolonged wars. This new, high-risk strategy promoted by Netanyahu could exceed Israel’s capabilities, as the society, economy, and military are not equipped for sustained, drawn-out conflicts.

This shift, driven by a sense of invulnerability due to current levels of US support, has led to a decline in long-term planning.

As Stephen Walt, a Harvard University professor of international relations, writes in Foreign Policy, “the deepest problem facing Israel is the gradual erosion of Israeli strategic thinking over the past fifty years.” Walt argues that one important factor in the decline of Israeli strategic thinking at the expense of tactical choices is “the sense of arrogance and impunity that stems from American protection and respect for Israel’s wishes.”

If the most powerful country in the world supports you no matter what you do, the need to think carefully about your actions will inevitably diminish.

Walt posits that Israel today, by prioritizing immediate tactical gains over strategic vision, faces a looming and resounding defeat. As it stands, the occupation state has yet to propose a realistic plan for Gaza’s future or a strategy to address its regional adversaries, who are becoming increasingly emboldened.


(The 'value' which the USA shares with the Zionist state is genocide, neither state would exist without it.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 29, 2024 11:51 am

Patrick Lawrence: ‘The End of Days’
August 28, 2024
Save
Wars of Gog and Magog: Between the U.S. and Israel, our world is defined by those who view it in radically simplistic binaries.

Image
“The Vision of Ezekiel,” by Francisco Collantes, 1630. (Web Gallery of Art, Wikimedia Commons, Public domain)

By Patrick Lawrence
The Floutist

Orit Malka Strook serves in the Netanyahu government as minister of settlements and national missions.

She has a seat in the Knesset representing the National Religious Party–Religious Zionism, a political amalgam formed last year when the Religious Zionism Party merged with the Jewish Home Party, which was itself a merger of three Zionist-extremist parties.

Orit Malka Strook’s political journey, this is to say, began on the far right and has proceeded to the far, far, far right of the Israeli constellation.

Orit Malka Strook was born in 1960 and is the product of a rigorous education in Israel’s most rigorously Zionist yeshivas. After she married in her late teens or very early twenties — the date is not clear in her publicly available biographies — Orit Malka Strook and her husband, a rabbinical student, moved to a Jewish settlement on the Sinai Peninsula.

When Israel handed the Sinai back to Egypt in 1982, the outcome of the Camp David Accords President Jimmy Carter negotiated four years earlier, Strook and her spouse moved to a Jewish settlement in Hebron.

To give an idea of Orit Malka Strook’s politics in practice, one of her sons was convicted 17 years ago of violently attacking a young Palestinian in Hebron and spent two and a half years in prison for his offense. We can infer with some confidence this must have been an especially vicious incident, as settlers’ attacks on Palestinians have been absolutely routine in the West Bank for many years.

Orit Malka Strook was horrified at her son’s criminal conviction, because the court accepted the word of Palestinians over the word of a Jew — so furthering the Palestinian cause, as she saw it, over the cause of the settlers, the Zionist cause.

Image
Orit Strook in January 2023. (Mark Neyman / Government Press Office of Israel, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

Let us set aside the thought that Israel should have no such thing as a minister of settlements given they are all illegal, as the International Court of Justice has at last ruled.

Straight to my point, Orit Malka Strook, who still resides in Hebron, has lately taken to asserting that Israel is now “living through a miraculous time,” as Amit Varshizky put it in a very important piece in Haaretz earlier this month.

Orit Malka Strook sees the Israeli assault on the Palestinian of Gaza as — from the Haaretz piece — “the birth pangs of the Messiah and the advent of redemption.”

The war in Gaza is not a war, of course, but to Orit Malka Strook it is the apocalyptic war God’s chosen wage against Gog and Magog, the evil forces described in Ezekiel and then Revelations. These are the end-days, in Orit Malka Strook’s cosmology.

Reading the Haaretz piece and looking into Orit Malka Strook’s story, my mind went immediately back to the early years of our new millennium and the regime of George W. Bush. This bears some explanation.

‘With Us, or With the Terrorists’

As readers will easily recall, Bush II authorized the invasion of Afghanistan shortly after the events of Sept. 11, 2001, stating in his well-known phrase, “You are either with us or with the terrorists.”

Bush and his minders, notably Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, respectively his vice-president and defense secretary, then set about whipping up public fervor and gathering the support of loyal clients as they planned the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.

Bush II had a Manichean sensibility. He was a recovering alcoholic and had become a fervent Christian, of the evangelical sort so far as one can make out, in the course of his recovery.

To Bush II our world is divided between good and evil, and this was his thought as he recruited his “coalition of the willing” — a coalition of the coerced, as I have always thought of it.

It is well enough known that Jacques Chirac and his able foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, refused to take France into the coalition. An invasion of Iraq would destabilize the region, the French president thought (quite correctly). This made Paris a holdout among the major Western powers.

“Iraq does not represent an immediate threat that would justify an immediate war,” Chirac insisted two days before the U.S.–led invasion began. “France appeals to the responsibility of all to respect international law. Acting without the U.N.’s legitimacy, putting power before law, means taking on a heavy responsibility.”

Three-quarters of the French stood with Chirac, whose refusal to enlist France in Operation Iraqi Freedom strained Franco–American relations for several years. Remember “freedom fries” and the French as “cheese-eating surrender monkeys?”

This was the level to which Bush II brought American discourse as he manipulated public opinion prior to the invasion. Good guys, bad guys. Black hats, white hats.

There is one detail of the U.S.–French confrontation over Iraq that remains very little known. Just before the March 20, 2003, invasion, Bush II called Chirac in a late-hour attempt to persuade him to change his mind. The exchange was very heated.

Bush II made a vigorous argument that with the events of Sept. 11 the prophesied war of Gog and Magog had at last begun. I can only imagine what went through the worldly Chirac’s mind, or indeed the look on his face, as Bush II discoursed in this manner.

I know of only one account of this conversation. It is in The Irony of American Destiny: The Tragedy of American Foreign Policy (Walker & Co., 2010), a book William Pfaff published late in his life. The book sits at the end of Pfaff’s long and principled career as a sort of summation.

It is rightly read as his causes-and-consequences critique of American exceptionalism. And it includes, inter alia, a description of the Bush–Chirac exchange. He got it, if I recall correctly what he told me later, from a high source in the French Foreign Ministry.

Image
Chirac addressing a U.N. event in Paris, June 2005. (UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe)

Bill Pfaff was a colleague and a friend. He taught me to trace the path of U.S. policy from the narrow project of Soviet containment in the immediate postwar years to the never-ending messianic mission to save the world with which we now live.

Bush II and his Gog and Magog delusions were preposterous, yes. But they were, illogically and logically at once, the outcome of a consciousness that had endured — how shall we count? — since the 1945 victories, or since Wilson’s make-the-world-safe-for-democracy, or the 17th century Pilgrim landings.

Pfaff was pithily right to name his book as he did. American foreign policy has been a tragedy since the U.S. has had one worthy of the term, beginning with America’s attack on the Spanish empire in the last years of the 19th century.

With the world wars among the exceptions, it has since been a line of tragedies from Wilsonian universalism through the Cold War and Vietnam and the post–Cold War triumphalism of the 1990s.

Afghanistan, Iraq, the Balkans, Libya, Syria: The tragedies have but worsened since Sept. 11. What unifies these disastrous adventures? This is simply understood.

Few senior officials since Bush II have professed to view the world as an end-times confrontation with Gog and Magog, but the fundamental belief remains just as Bush II had it: It is good-vs.-evil in our time, and it is as simple as that.

Mike Pompeo, Trump’s secretary of state and another Christian true believer, actually did think and speak in terms of the end-times.

Jake Sullivan, President Joe Biden’s national security adviser, formed his outlook — this by his own admission, remarkably enough — as he watched Westerns and those juvenile “Terminator” films during his youth. “I see the world as divided between good guys and bad guys,” he has unabashedly said.

We are talking, in sum, about a set of policies not rooted in thinking but in belief — irrational policies, in a word. The Cost of War Project at Brown University, a distinguished and honorable undertaking, measures the results of Washington’s post–Sept. 11 adventures quite precisely: $8 trillion, 905,000 casualties.

Orit Malka Strook is prominent among those who believe the Zionist state now confronts the evil ones prophesied in Ezekiel, but she is not alone: By no means is she an isolated figure.

“Increasing numbers in right-wing circles,” Amit Varshizky writes in Haaretz, “have lately joined Strock [sic] in identifying the war in Gaza with the War of Gog and Magog.” They subscribe, or some do, to the strange truths of Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook, the founder of religious Zionism in the late 19th century. “When there is a great war in the world,” he preached, “the power of the Messiah awakens.”

Varshizky has picked up on a resurgent religious extremism that seems to have been evident among Israelis for some time but goes unreported by all those foreign correspondents staffing bureaus in Jerusalem and covering for (rather than covering) the Zionist state’s countless excesses while pretending to do their jobs.

‘Mein Kampf in Reverse’

Image
Israel’s Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon addressing an event at the Pentagon in 2015. (Adrian Cadiz, DoD, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0)

Last spring Moshe Yaalon, a former Israeli defense minister and certainly a man committed to the Israeli cause, made some startling, not to say disturbing, public remarks on this topic.

His references in the following are to Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben–Gvir, the fanatical finance and security ministers in the Netanyahu regime’s freak-show cabinet.

Shiloh is a Zionist journal named for a settlement recorded in Joshua with which the Old Testament god was well-pleased; it also refers to an illegal and highly controversial settlement started on the ancient site in 1978 — just as Jimmy Carter was sponsoring the Camp David talks:

“When you talk about Smotrich and Ben Gvir, they have a rabbi. His name is Dov Lior. He is the rabbi of the Jewish Underground, who intended to blow up the Dome of the Rock — and before that the buses in Jerusalem. Why? In order to hurry up the ‘Last War.’

Do you hear them talking in terms of the Last War, or of Smotrich’s concept of ‘subjugation’? Read the article he published in Shiloh in 2017. First of all, this concept rests on Jewish supremacy: Mein Kampf in reverse.

My hair stands on end when I say that — as he said it. I learned and grew up in the house of Holocaust survivors and ‘never again.’ It is Mein Kampf in reverse: Jewish supremacy…. It is anchored in ideology. And then actually what [Smotrich] aspires to — as soon as possible — [is] to go to a big war. A war of Gog and Magog.”[/i]

Marco Carnelos, formerly an ambassador-rank diplomat in the Italian foreign service, brought the Yaalon comments to my attention in an excellent commentary published on Aug. 19 in Middle East Eye. The Floutist will shortly consider Smotrich’s deranged, boldly racist essay in Shiloh at greater length.

We should sit up and consider carefully Yaalon’s warnings and the Haaretz report. This believing-without-thinking is well inside the Netanyahu regime by virtue of Bibi’s dependence on extremist Zionists such as Ben–Givr, Smotrich and Strook for his political survival.

There are implications to think about here. And we should then take care to connect some dots: Christian Zionists in America are less influential on the Israel question than these shockingly deluded extremists, but not by much, and America’s Christian Zionists are just as extreme in their version of “the end of days.”

We cannot look upon Israel’s Zionists with any kind of detachment or critique from some conjured place of elevated superiority. Americans have long told themselves similarly grand, delusional stories to justify their history of injustices and cruelties: Bush II’s Gog and Magog bit is merely an over-the-top telling, a variant on the theme.

U.S. policy, certainly since the Sept. 11 disasters, has been based ever less on rational calculation — to say nothing of concern for the global commonweal — than on what I think of as desperately held beliefs in the face of twenty-first century realities.

It is the same with the Israelis as the killing proceeds daily in Gaza and, increasingly, in the West Bank. Israeli policy — and this is true of American policy, too, at bottom — is conceived and executed by people who do not act rationally. They answer to their gods, whether this means Yahweh or divine Providence—“the Great Œconomist,” as some of the 18th-century historians used to put it.

There are grave implications here. Chief among them, there is no talking to these people, for they live and act behind the thick, protective wall of messianic belief. They may pretend to listen to others, but they do not hear. Nothing others may say can change them. This is a highly consequential circumstance, given the power people who act irrationally hold.

Between the U.S. and Israel, our world is defined by those who view it in radically simplistic binaries. To them there is no place for complexity in our increasingly complex global environment. One could argue this is a good definition of incompetence.

This is our dreadful predicament — dreadful because the way forward, beyond these people, cannot be but long and arduous. And here we come to a final conclusion of sorts.

Only failure holds any promise of forcing either Israel or the U.S. to change course. I unshyly applaud all the very costly foreign policy failures of both for this reason, although I must quickly add that failure very often disappoints because the policy cliques in Washington and Tel Aviv seem committed to going from one failure to the next without changing anything.

If anything, Zionist Israel appears yet more dedicated than the U.S. to its course of righteous murder and destruction in the name of its apocalyptic destiny. This seems to me the grimmest reality of our time.

If the assault Israel prosecutes in Gaza and the West Bank — and now possibly in Lebanon and Iran — is an end-days battle against Gog and Magog, how can the righteous desist, or make peace, or negotiate an enduring settlement? How can it end short of the Israelis’ destruction?

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/08/28/p ... d-of-days/

******

Israel Starts Ethnic Cleansing In West Bank

The Anglo-American colonial project in Palestine has launched another war to remove the indigenous population from its land.

Israel launches major operation in West Bank; Palestinian officials say 9 killed - Washington Post

TEL AVIV — Israel launched a major operation in multiple cities in the West Bank on Wednesday involving hundreds of troops.
The troops were sent in with air support and bulldozers, according to an Israeli military official speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive military operation. Eyewitnesses cited drones scanning the skies and armored personnel carriers carrying troops on the ground.

The Israel Defense Forces and Shin Bet, the country’s internal security service, announced in a brief joint statement they were launching a counterterrorism operation in Jenin and Tulkarm. Operations were also reported in al-Fara’a refugee camp, near Tubas. At least nine Palestinians have been killed since midnight, the Health Ministry in Ramallah said. Seven were taken to a hospital in Tubas and two to a hospital in Jenin, it said.


Since June 1967, when the Zionist launched a war against its Arab neighbors, it has illegally occupied the West Bank and Gaza.

Today Israel's foreign minister Israel Katz tweeted in Hebrew (machine translation):

ישראל כ”ץ Israel Katz @Israel_katz - 4:42 UTC · Aug 28, 2024 The IDF is working intensively from tonight in the Jenin and Tulkarm refugee camps to thwart Islamic-Iranian terrorist infrastructures that have been established there. Iran is working to establish an eastern terrorist front against Israel in the West Bank, according to the Gaza and Lebanon model, by financing and arming terrorists and smuggling advanced weapons from Jordan.

We must deal with the threat just as we deal with the terrorist infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary evacuation of Palestinian residents and whatever steps are required. This is a war for everything and we must win it.


In the Gaza strip the colonial army has pushed the 2 million plus surviving Palestinians into an area of less than 15 square kilometer. It continues bombing them. Any building beyond has ben raised. The obvious aim there is to push the whole population into Egypt's Sinai desert and to provide their land to illegal settlers.

A similar project has now started in the West Bank. The Zionists plan to raze it to then push its Palestinian population across the river into Jordan.

There is little support the Palestinians can count on. The 'western' world is supporting the Zionist entity with all it has. The U.S., Germany and others provide it with a steady stream of weapons and ammunition. The Arab world is mostly silent. Turkey provides the Zionist entity with oil stolen from the Kurdish regions in Iraq. Egypt has expanded its economic ties with Israel by becoming a way station for imports to that country.

The axis of resistance, a mixed agglomeration of irregular forces in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen - nurtured by Iran - is the sole external force that is willing to intervene.

But the axis had so far be careful to not give a cause for a U.S. intervention against itself. Hezbullah in Lebanon has settle one of its conflict accounts with Israel. As Alastair Crooke in a talk with Judge Napolitano (vid) quoted here by Yves Smith, provides:

[6:40] What we have seen is the war fragmenting in different ways. First of all, it fragmented with the killing of Fuad Shukr in Beirut just before Haniyeh was killed in Tehran. And for that reason, the actual operations of the Resistance changed. Because as far as Hezbollah was concerned, the killing of Fuad crossed all red lines, all the understandings, the careful balances were broken by that. And they opened a separate account, quite separate to what was happening in Gaza. And they opened a separate account.
And so what happened in this weekend was about settling that account with Israel. And it stuck very carefully to the equation, the war equations, that they had between Israel and Hezbollah. The didn’t go out of the equations. So if you like they attacked in Tel Aviv the Mossad headquarters and the headquarters of 8200, equivalent roughly to NSA in the US, if you like, it’s the communications intercept. Because that was the decision-making if you like structure that led Fuad Shukr’s killing in Beirut. And they did in Tel Aviv because they killed him in Beirut. There was a complete equivalence if you like in that.


Hezbollah and Israel have settled the account over the killing of Fuad Shukr. But the accounting for the Zionist war against Palestine is not yet finished.

The operation also created deterrence against further Zionist attacks on leaders of the resistance:

“Hezbollah’s” response of missiles and drones early yesterday morning in Israeli territory, specifically in the central area of Tel Aviv, is significant because it means that Israeli operations to kill leaders of resistance groups in Lebanon, Palestine, and Yemen will now be met with a prompt and effective response. Furthermore, these operations have come to incur substantial costs.
...
Efforts by the Israeli entity to cover its growing number of defeats and failures through fabrications and forgeries are no longer effective, as resistance groups are exposing them on the ground through precise counteractions.


Iran, which still has to revenge the recent killing of Hamas leader Haniyeh in Tehran, will make a similar calculation. Its upcoming operation against Israel related to the Haniyeh case will be separate from its defense of Palestine's rights and population.

That defense will continue until all rights of the Palestinian, including the right to return to their land, are restored.

Posted by b on August 28, 2024 at 10:19 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/08/i ... .html#more

******

Fog of War and Narrative, Israel and Hezbollah Attacks Edition
Posted on August 27, 2024 by Yves Smith

Forgive me for trying to dig into a story, of the exchange of strikes by Israel and Hezbollah a few days ago. Like far too many conflict-related accounts, the initial accounts depicted the attacks as a major escalation, possibly presaging a wider war, then dialed that back, way back, to the degree that one wonders if at least some press outlets were trying to memory hole the events. Confirming this perhaps unduly cynical view was that the Financial Times did not mention these attacks on the landing page of the Financial Times mere hours after they occurred. By contrast, the Wall Street Journal did make it their leading piece, with the title Israel, Hezbollah Signal De-Escalation After Predawn Bombardments. We’ll discuss it

Recall that Israel and its allies, the US, France, and the UK, have been waiting to see what if anything Iran and Hezbollah will do in the way of retaliation after Israel killed senior Hezbollah military official Fuad Shukr in Beirut and the lead negotiator from the Hamas side in the not-going-anywhere Gaza ceasefire talks, Ismail Haniyeh, in Tehran when he was a guest attending the inauguration of incoming president Masoud Pezeshkian. The assassination of Haniyeh is particularly significant since he was from the political, not military, wing and was widely depicted as one of the most moderate voices in Hamas. He has been replaced in the negotiations by military leader Yaha Sinwar.

With Iran, the Anglosphere press has been faithfully repeating the spin that stern words have cowed Iran into inaction. But a sharp letter from some EU states along those lines elicited a tart response:

Iran has sharply criticized a joint letter from France, Germany and the UK that urged it to show restraint and not retaliate for the assassination of a Hamas leader in Tehran.

Iran said the letter ignored Israeli "crimes and terrorism." https://t.co/JGvh7YmCDq

— DW News (@dwnews) August 13, 2024


Iranian commentators like Professor Sayed Mirandi also stress that Iran most assuredly will retaliate, but at a time of its choosing.

Even though it is difficult to be sure what exactly happened in the mutual attacks on Sunday, the more complete-seeming accounts indicate that both Iran and Hezbollah intend to control the escalation and will not be provoked into rash moves. Their strategy has been and continues to be a war of attrition, wearing down not just Israeli and US capabilities, but Israel’s will. The Axis of Resistance has studied Israel over a very long period, and has taken stock of the fact that Israel and the US are set up to wage short, airpower heavy conflicts. Thus it should come as no surprise that even the Western media is chronicling how Israel has failed to make much of a dent in Hamas after nearly 11 months of engagement (see Simplicius for lots of detail).

The psychological toll is even greater since the premise of Israel was that it was a place where Jews could be safe. Larry Wilkerson in a recent interview with Nima emphasized that Israel and the US need to restore the image of Israel as the fiercest and most formidable force in the region, even though one wonders how that can be done. Slaughtering Palestinian women and children does not rate.

A remarkable confirmation of that view came in a op-ed in Haaretz last week, Israel Will Collapse Within a Year if the War of Attrition Against Hamas and Hezbollah Continues by former IDF General Yitzhak Brik. Key sections:

I assume that Defense Minister Gallant already understands that the war has lost its purpose. Israel is sinking deeper into the Gazan mud, losing more and more soldiers as they get killed or wounded, without any chance of achieving the war’s main goal: bringing down Hamas.

The country really is galloping towards the edge of an abyss. If the war of attrition against Hamas and Hezbollah continues, Israel will collapse within no more than a year.

Terror attacks are intensifying in the West Bank and inside the country, the reservist army is voting with its feet following recurring mobilizations of combat soldiers, and the economy is crashing. Israel has also become a pariah state, prompting economic boycotts and an embargo on arms shipments.

We are also losing our social resilience, as the growing hatred between different parts of the nation threatens to ignite and bring to its destruction from within.
Sinwar and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah understand Israel’s dire situation. What Israel could have achieved earlier with a hostage/cease-fire agreement has become impossible due to the new conditions that Netanyahu introduced into the proposed deal…

In light of the new situation, a threat by Iran and Hezbollah to attack Israel in response to the killing of the two senior officials is materializing in the region. The use of assassinations is a step threatening to ignite the entire Middle East, decided upon by the three pyromaniacs, Netanyahu, Gallant and Chief of Staff Halevi, without thinking about the significance of their irresponsible decisions.


So Israelis have been waiting for what the Axis of Resistance will do. That anxiety is wearing. That’s confirmed in the Journal story we mentioned earlier, which holds back on the details on the strikes till the end. And even then they are a bit thin. From the Journal:

After a heavy exchange of fire early Sunday between Israel and Iran-backed Shiite militia Hezbollah, the regional military powers signaled a desire to avoid a spiral that could lead to a wider Mideast conflict.

Let’s stop here. That seems to be US de-escalatory messaging coloring the Journal’s account. See by contrast:

Hezbollah has fired hundreds of rockets into northern Israel, calling it the ‘first phase’ of its retaliation for the assassination of top commander Fuad Shukr, in Beirut in July. Earlier, Israel launched what it called ‘pre-emptive’ strikes on southern Lebanon. pic.twitter.com/4klEdqR9KD

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) August 25, 2024


Mind you, both Hezbollah and Iran do want to avoid a wider war, but continued retaliation, which Hezbollah has said is coming, risks that. The Journal argues that the two sides might settle back into tit for tat exchanges. From much later in the Journal account:

Sunday’s fighting got under way before dawn, when Israel’s military hit dozens of targets in Lebanon in what it called a pre-emptive strike. The U.S. and Israel had recently obtained intelligence that Hezbollah planned to attack early Sunday, U.S. officials said. Israel briefed the U.S. on its plans before going ahead….

Israel knocked out about two-thirds of the projectiles that Hezbollah planned to launch Sunday morning, a senior Israeli official said. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said all of the drones launched at a “strategic target in the center of the country” were intercepted.

One Israeli sailor was killed by shrapnel from an Israeli rocket interceptor that exploded over his boat, a military spokesman said. Hezbollah said two of its members were killed.

Nasrallah said the attack had two phases—a barrage of 340 rockets at northern Israel and a launch of attack drones farther into the country. Among the targets was the headquarters of Israel’s spy agency, Mossad, just north of Tel Aviv, Nasrallah and a person familiar with the matter said. Nasrallah said Hezbollah also targeted a Tel Aviv-area base of the Israeli military’s Unit 8200, which is responsible for signals intelligence and cyber.


One notices that Israel says that it shot down most but not all of Hezbollah rockets and drones, but the story is silent on whether the attack on the Mossad HQ and Unit 8200 outpost had any success. Note that much earlier, the Journal quoted Hezbollah leader Nasrallah:

“We said this was a preliminary response,” Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said in an address Sunday. “If we assess that the impact of the preliminary response was not satisfactory, we will act accordingly. For now we consider that the response is over, and the country can take a breath.”

One has to think whether Nasrallah deemed the attack to be satisfactory or not would depend on the harm done to the Mossad and Unit 8200 operations. The Times of Israel quote Nasrallah stating that the Glilot military base, which houses the 8200 intelligence group, was the main target

Hezbollah published footage supporting the idea that they did damage the Unit 8200 facility:

#Hezbollah :: published a much more detailed infographic with more understandable graphics of the Gillot base in the suburbs of #Tel_Aviv, the base where the main headquarters of the #Zionist intelligence command known as Amman is located and was targeted today 🔻🔻 pic.twitter.com/Z8Clv5WzPE

— ALI Yasser (@AaisackAli) August 26, 2024


Even though other targets were secondary, it appears Hezbollah inflicted additional damage (there was much ridicule on Twitter that Hezbollah torched a chicken coop but the fires went beyond that):

Lebanon targeted Israel's north.

the north is burning 💥🔻🚨🔥

Hezbollah Tel Aviv
pic.twitter.com/NPwRNJ7Ep2

— Volkan Albistan (@valbistan) August 26, 2024


The Times of Israel reported ‘We don’t count’: Northern leaders complain military only acts when Tel Aviv is targeted, noting that the mayors of three communities vowed to “cut off contact with the government”. I am not sure why that amounts to a threat.

The Journal is also curiously silent on what the Israel pre-emptive strikes amounted to. It gets credit for not dignifying claims like this:

Israel is not carpet bombing Lebanon. Israel launched a preemptive strike on Hezbollah's precision-missile launch sites preparing to attack targets in Tel Aviv. Hundreds of fighter jets got to thousands of Hezbollah rockets first. Learn to tell the truth you primitive barbarian. https://t.co/rVElsgsaP3

— Daniel (@FortifyCulture) August 25, 2024


We’ll unpack soon what was wrong about this claim. A less excitable version of the Israel attack from the Financial Times:

Israel began its attack shortly before 5am local time, deploying 100 jets to bomb about 40 sites in Lebanon after identifying what it said were preparations by Hizbollah “to fire missiles and rockets”.

The presentation on Monday by Alastair Crooke on Judge Napolitano fills in some key gaps in these accounts. Starting at 3:10:



Whatever you’ve read is almost certainly wrong. It’s a narrative…..First of all, it all happened at around 4 o’clock in the morning on Sunday. The Israelis started to see people moving in Lebanon and moving towards platforms. Hezbollah was planning the operation to fire drones and rockets at 5:15 on Sunday morning. And Israel started to, an attack, a direct attack. It involved I think about a hundred aircraft.

But contrary to what the Israeli propagandists at the IDF are saying, and I know this not from Hezbollah but I know this from inside Lebanon, people who are on the ground there, it was chaotic twenty minutes. Israel just bombed various valleys where they imagined the ballistic missiles were. But they’d been cleared out of there some time ago. There were no ballistic missiles. You can check that, there are people on the ground who know what’s happened. There are no missiles. So when they said they destroyed thousands of missile launchers, this is a complete lie. Because first of all, there are no missiles, no ballistic missiles, no large missiles south of the Litani River. What you have is drones and small rockets. And none of these have launchers. And they destroyed none of them. It was just a show, a show of force and it only lasted about twenty minutes…..

[6:40] What we have seen is the war fragmenting in different ways. First of all, it fragmented with the killing of Fuad Shukr in Beirut just before Haniyeh was killed in Tehran. And for that reason, the actual operations of the Resistance changed. Because as far as Hezbollah was concerned, the killing of Fuad crossed all red lines, all the understandings, the careful balances were broken by that. And they opened a separate account, quite separate to what was happening in Gaza. And they opened a separate account.

And so what happened in this weekend was about settling that account with Israel. And it stuck very carefully to the equation, the war equations, that they had between Israel and Hezbollah. The didn’t go out of the equations. So if you like they attacked in Tel Aviv the Mossad headquarters and the headquarters of 8200, equivalent roughly to NSA in the US, if you like, it’s the communications intercept. Because that was the decision-making if you like structure that led Fuad Shukr’s killing in Beirut. And they did in Tel Aviv because they killed him in Beirut. There was a complete equivalence if you like in that.

And one phase was three hundred and twenty rockets. Of course, it’s been played down. I can’t tell you exactly how many were shot down or didn’t land properly. But they were targeted not on people or civilians, they were targeted on military bases and very precisely on air defense systems. You can see that.

And then immediately, 4 o’clock, the Israelis came in bombing, pretty randomly, in the areas where they thought Hezbollah would have their ballistic missiles but as I said there were none, they were north of the Litani [River]. They were sending a message to Hezbollah by not going beyond the Litani, that the equation with the war with Israel was still holding. And that’s an important point. The Israelis were signaling, “OK, you hit Tel Aviv for Shukr but we are not going to hit Beirut.”


Note that the “precision-guided” in the tweet we flagged earlier as dubious = ballistic missiles.

Crooke shortly thereafter report that the reason the Western press has no reports of damage in Israel was that the government put out a complete ban on that information, confirmed independently by the Palestine Chronicle.

Given the news blackout, it’s impossible to confirm claims like this, but they can’t be ruled out either:

The truth is out, Hassan Nasrallah’s hit has been confirmed, Commander of Israeli 8200 intelligence unit, the most sophisticated intelligence unit on earth is dead! #HIZBULLAH #Hezbollah pic.twitter.com/PwSUFHRLrk

— জয় বাংলা 1.0 (@LOC_bbk) August 27, 2024


And Nasrallah seems exceptionally pleased with himself.

Nasrallah couldn’t hide his satisfaction at Israel’s failure to thwart Hezbollah’s attack. He almost laughed:

“This is no longer the weak Lebanon you could invade with a marching band. Now, it might happen that we invade you with a musical band!”

pic.twitter.com/xspV39wEs8

— taseenb (@taseenb) August 26, 2024


If the IDF actually thought there were ballistic missiles in those valleys south of the Litani, that also points to a pretty big Israel intelligence failure.

Needless to say, this somewhat long-winded account illustrates what an informational hall of mirrors we live in, and why it’s hard to take any reports from Team US at face value.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/08 ... ition.html

******

Dangerous heights: Israel’s ascent on the escalation ladder

While Israel continues its military escalations with limited options and increasing risk, the Axis of Resistance remains strategically low on the ‘escalation ladder,’ waiting for the moment when the enemy’s troops and munitions near exhaustion.


The Cradle's Military Correspondent

AUG 28, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

Following Hezbollah’s recent rocket and drone reprisal, which successfully targeted Israel’s Glilot military intelligence facility “Aman” and the Ein Shemer site used for aerial monitoring and air defense, the other members of West Asia’s Axis of Resistance now face a range of strategic choices regarding their next steps.

Iran has consistently asserted, through its diplomats and high-ranking officials, that a retaliatory response is inevitable. The message from Tehran is clear: a reaction is forthcoming, and it is only a matter of time.

Meanwhile, Yemen is also contemplating its response to the massive Israeli strikes on its main port of Hodeidah. This attack, seen as a disproportionate use of force aimed at inflicting harm on Yemeni civilians and infrastructure, has further galvanized Sanaa’s resolve against the occupation state.

Stepping up escalations

These anticipated responses from the Resistance Axis are influenced by various factors beyond the conventions of military deterrence and existing strategic balances. Central to their strategy is the objective of halting the ongoing war on Gaza, a goal all Axis state and non-state actors have prioritized since the launch of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood almost a year ago.

The region-wide war in West Asia – and the potential responses of each party to the conflict – is best understood through an “escalation ladder,” a conceptual tool that illustrates readiness and capacity for further military engagement.

Israel: Near the top of the ladder

The occupation state is currently positioned near the top of the escalation ladder. Its high placement reflects almost 11 months of extensive use of military assets, including a range of offensive and defensive munitions, tanks, ground troops, and missile systems.

Barring its nuclear stockpiles, Israel has used nearly its entire arsenal across multiple theaters, indicating a high level of military commitment and operational intensity. This leaves Israel with little room for further escalation without resorting to more drastic measures, such as full-scale invasions or the deployment of strategic weapons.

Despite Israel’s substantial military capabilities, its reliance on external support was evident during Iran’s limited retaliatory strikes during Operation True Promise in April. Israel was forced to summon a western coalition and use the airspace of allied Arab states to intercept Iranian projectiles.

This reliance raises questions about the occupation military’s autonomy and ability to sustain operations independently. The economic cost of these operations, reportedly reaching billions of dollars for both Israel and its allies, also illustrates the resource strain of prolonged engagement.

Iran: Careful steps on the first rungs

Iran occupies a much lower rung on the escalation ladder, reflecting Tehran’s restrained, yet calculated approach to direct military engagement with Israel. The Islamic Republic has made one limited confrontation to date, in which it primarily used relatively basic missile systems like the Emad and Rezvan ballistic missiles.

It has the capacity to deploy more advanced weaponry, like the Kheibar-Shekan missiles, designed to penetrate advanced missile defense systems.

Following True Promise, which was the response to Israel’s bombing of its consulate in Damascus, Iran demonstrated its ability to escalate while exposing limitations in Israeli missile defenses. The operation included direct strikes from its territory, breaking a long-standing strategic barrier. This move has challenged Israel’s military doctrine, which relies heavily on missile interception capabilities and strategic deterrence.

Iran’s strategy involves leveraging its vast missile arsenal, including older models and newer, more maneuverable missiles like the Dezful, Haj Qasim, Khorramshahr, and the Fattah 1 and 2 hypersonic missiles.

These advanced missiles pose a significant challenge to Israeli interceptor systems such as the Arrow/Hetz and David’s Sling, which may struggle to intercept them effectively. Tehran’s cautious positioning on the ladder allows it to maintain strategic flexibility, responding forcefully, if necessary, while avoiding a full-scale war.

None of its modern, sophisticated arsenal was used, the number of drones and missiles used was only in the hundreds, and Iran has not deployed any military personnel in a direct confrontation. Iran’s escalation potential, therefore, remains very high.

Hezbollah: Mid-level engagement with strategic reserves

Lebanon’s Hezbollah stands around the middle of the escalation ladder. Since 8 October, the Lebanese resistance has declared over 2,000 military operations, targeting Israeli military positions and assets well into its strategic depth. Despite its active engagement, Hezbollah has carefully managed to avoid depleting its resources, using its more sophisticated missile arsenal, or escalating to an all-out war.

While dropping hints at its capabilities, such as its underground missile facility, Imad-4, Hezbollah has not yet deployed its most advanced or secret capabilities developed since the 2006 war, indicating that it retains significant strategic reserves.

Furthermore, unlike the Israeli army’s ground forces in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, Hezbollah forces have not been put in direct conflict with the enemy. Reportedly over 100,000 strong – not including the organization’s elite corps – and with the ability to call on many hundreds of thousands of regional fighters who have pledged to join any direct battle against Israel, these troops are neither depleted nor exhausted, unlike the enemy forces.

Hezbollah’s middle-ground positioning is a balanced approach, keeping pressure on Israel and supporting its allies without exhausting its arsenal and fighting forces or risking all-out war.

Yemen: Strategic posturing at the mid-level

Yemen, like Hezbollah, is positioned midway on the escalation ladder. The Ansarallah-aligned army’s involvement has primarily consisted of strategic maneuvers and support operations in and around its territorial waters, rather than direct confrontations – with the notable exception of last month’s unprecedented drone strike on Tel Aviv and similar attacks on the port of Eilat.

Yemen has made use of various missile types, including Quds cruise missiles and ballistic missiles derived from Iran’s Kheibar-Shekan, Emad, and Qiam missiles. These assets enable Yemen to project power across the region despite the technological and military limitations imposed by the Saudi and UAE-led coalition’s blockade.

Sanaa’s strategic posture is enhanced by its ability to rapidly produce inexpensive munitions and maintain ongoing production capabilities, allowing it to sustain operations without significant escalation. The Yemeni Armed Forces are also ready to step up in support of Lebanon, should Israel decide to escalate further.

Crucially, Yemen’s ideological commitment and tribal social structure provide its political authority with greater freedom to choose targets and execute responses without the same economic concerns or fears of international backlash that might constrain other actors in the Axis.

This flexibility allows Yemen to pursue a more aggressive stance if needed, as evidenced by its potential for launching complex operations aimed at overwhelming enemy defenses, possibly in coordination with Iranian actions.

The only way is down

The current positions of Israel, Iran, Hezbollah, and Yemen on the escalation ladder reflect their strategic calculations and potential actions. Israel’s high positioning suggests a limited capacity for further escalation without severe consequences, while Iran’s low placement indicates a strategy of restraint, keeping its options open for future engagements.

Hezbollah and Yemen, both at the mid-level, demonstrate a calculated approach to maintaining their involvement without exhausting their resources or escalating the conflict to an uncontrollable level.

The possibility of escalation from Iraqi resistance factions or even the Syrian army following repeated violations adds another layer of risk that Israel must contend with.

The occupation state’s continued escalation without a clear endgame and an understanding of its own limitations, coupled with growing US reluctance to intervene, could ultimately lead to a strategic overreach and outright defeat in a full-on regional war.

https://thecradle.co/articles/dangerous ... ion-ladder

Namibia blocks ship carrying 'explosive material' for Israel citing Genocide Convention

Windhoek confirmed the decision complies with its 'obligation not to support or be complicit in Israeli war crimes'

News Desk

AUG 28, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Frits Olinga/Shipspotting.com)

The Namibian government has barred the Portuguese-flagged MV Kathrin cargo vessel from entering its territorial waters under suspicions that the ship carries military equipment and “explosive material” for Israel.

“Yes, I have asked Namport via the line ministry to consider the request to not allow the vessel MV Kathrin to dock in our ports. The request was made on Friday,” Justice Minister Yvonne Dausab told Namibian daily New Era on 26 August.

“Upon receiving reports that a vessel may be carrying weapons intended for Israel, I addressed a letter to Cabinet, international relations ministry, works ministry, as well as the safety and security ministry, advising and reminding them of our international obligations, not only under the Genocide Convention but also as articulated in the recent advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ),” she added.

Citing a police investigation, Dausab confirmed the MV Kathrin was “indeed carrying explosive material destined for Israel.” “Namibia complies with our obligation not to support or be complicit in Israeli war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, as well as its unlawful occupation of Palestine."

The ship, owned by German company Concord Shipping, had requested permission to dock at the port of Walvis Bay before continuing its journey north, likely toward the Mediterranean via the Strait of Gibraltar.

Last week, rights groups warned Windhoek that the country could implicate itself in grave human rights violations had it allowed the vessel to dock.

“We are pleased that our government has decided to respect international law and decided not to be complicit to genocide,” the chairman of the Economic and Social Justice Trust (ESJT) human rights group, Herbert Jauch, told the BBC.

Earlier this year, former Namibian president Hage Geingob made headlines after chastising Germany’s “shocking decision” to support Israel in the genocide case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) brought by South Africa.

“Germany cannot morally express commitment to the United Nations Convention against genocide, including atonement for the genocide in Namibia, whilst supporting the equivalent of a holocaust and genocide in Gaza,” the statement from his office read.

https://thecradle.co/articles/namibia-b ... convention

(It's good to call out savage former colonial bosses.)

WFP halts Gaza operations after Israeli forces open fire on UN vehicle

The UN agency said the vehicle received ‘multiple clearances’ from Tel Aviv before being fired on by the Israeli army

News Desk

AUG 29, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: WFP)

The UN World Food Programme (WFP) has suspended operations in Gaza “until further notice” on 28 August after one of its vehicles was attacked by Israeli forces in the strip.

WFP announced on 28 August that “it is pausing the movement of its employees in Gaza until further notice after a WFP team came under fire on the evening of 27 August, a few meters from an Israeli check point at the Wadi Gaza bridge.”

The UN organization said its team was returning from the Kerem Shalom border crossing with two armored vehicles after escorting trucks carrying humanitarian aid toward central Gaza.

“Despite being clearly marked and receiving multiple clearances by Israeli authorities to approach, the vehicle was directly struck by gunfire as it was moving towards an IDF checkpoint. It sustained at least ten bullets: five on the driver’s side, two on the passenger side, and three on other parts of the vehicle. None of the employees onboard were physically harmed,” the WFP statement added.

It notes that this is not the first time a WFP has been shot at by Israeli forces. The Israeli army did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

WFP Executive Director Cindy McCain said, “This is totally unacceptable and the latest in a series of unnecessary security incidents that have endangered the lives of WFP’s team in Gaza.”

The amount of aid entering Gaza remains inadequate for the needs of those in the strip.

Israeli restrictions have created a “deliberately impossible” situation for aid groups to address the crisis, the International Network for Aid, Relief, and Assistance (INARA) said on Thursday.

Starvation – which international organizations have said is being weaponized by Israel – has overtaken the strip as dangerous infectious diseases and illnesses spread rapidly across Gaza.

The UN is preparing a polio vaccination campaign after the World Health Organization (WHO) said that Abdel-Rahman Abu el-Jedian, a 10-month-old baby, was paralyzed by the virus in the first such case in Gaza in over two decades.

Hebrew news outlet Channel 13 reported on Wednesday, citing sources, that Israel agreed to a temporary humanitarian truce to allow polio vaccinations. The truce is not part of prisoner exchange negotiations with Hamas, the report said, adding that the decision was made by Benjamin Netanyahu and the security establishment without informing the Prime Minister’s Office.

Netanyahu’s office only responded to the channel by saying this is not a truce, but merely the “allocation” of certain areas in the strip for vaccination and that there will be no comprehensive truce.

Meanwhile, the prime minister continues to obstruct ceasefire and captive-exchange talks.

https://thecradle.co/articles/wfp-halts ... un-vehicle

West Bank in flames as resistance confronts vast Israeli offensive

Abu Shujaa, the commander of the Quds Brigades’ Tulkarem branch, was killed on the second day of Israel’s operation

News Desk

AUG 29, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: X)

The death toll from Israel’s large-scale operation in the occupied West Bank has risen to at least 18 on 29 August, as fierce clashes rage between Israeli forces and Palestinian resistance groups in the streets and refugee camps of the territory.

“Occupation forces expanded their aggression on Tulkarem, including Tulkarem camp and Nour Shams camp, raiding dozens of homes there and subjecting many civilians to field interrogations while continuing to besiege Nour Shams camp,” WAFA news agency reported on 29 August.

In the city of Jenin, Israeli troops “continue to besiege the city and storm its eastern neighborhood, and have sent military reinforcements to the vicinity of its camp amidst violent clashes and the sound of explosions,” WAFA added.

Fighting also continues in the Faraa refugee camp south of the city of Tubas.

Among those killed were eight Palestinians in Jenin, five in Tulkarem, and four in Tubas, with at least 30 others injured. The toll is expected to rise.

In Tulkarem, the famous and popular commander of the city’s Quds Brigades branch, Mohammad Jaber, known as Abu Shujaa, was assassinated by Israeli forces.


Israeli troops besieged a home he was in with four other fighters in Tulkarem’s Nour Shams camp, where they fought for hours before being killed. The Israeli army has detained their bodies.


“As part of the initial response to the assassination of our leader, our fighters were able to ambush an infantry force in the Manshiyya axis [in Nour Shams camp] behind Abu Ubaidah Mosque, where our engineering unit was able to detonate a pre-prepared explosive device near the force and shower them with bullets, causing direct hits,” the Tulkarem Brigade said in a statement on Thursday morning.

Abu Shujaa had survived at least three previous Israeli attempts on his life. In an interview with Al Mayadeen earlier this month, Abu Shujaa said, “It doesn’t matter if they assassinate me or anyone else, we will continue. It will not stop at one person … the resistance continues.”


Several other groups continued to confront the Israeli attack on the West Bank on Thursday.

“We targeted a Zionist infantry force with machine guns in the eastern axis of Jenin, and achieved direct hits in their ranks, and the occupation is firing smoke bombs to cover up its losses,” the Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades said on 29 August.

The Israeli operation – dubbed “Camps of Summer” – began early on 28 August. It has been described as the largest Israeli operation in the West Bank in over two decades, since the Second Intifada.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz has called for forced evacuations of civilians in the territory.

“We need to deal with the threat exactly as we deal with terror infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary evacuation of Palestinian civilians and any other step needed,” Katz said.

https://thecradle.co/articles/west-bank ... -offensive

******

Image

What Israel Supporters Really Mean When They Say “Release The Hostages”

What they are saying is that they believe Israel should murder children, decapitate them, rip their guts out, dismember them, mutilate them, burn them alive, every single day, until its military demands are submitted to.

Caitlin Johnstone
August 26, 2024

If you’re not on social media, you’ve likely spent ten and a half months blissfully unaware of an extremely freakish but very common phenomenon in which Israel’s supporters respond to images and videos of dead and mutilated children in Gaza by babbling about the Israeli hostages being held there by Hamas.

Whenever you see someone sharing raw footage of the most horrific thing imaginable being inflicted upon someone who couldn’t possibly have done anything to deserve it, and someone in the replies yelling “RELEASE THE HOSTAGES!”, it’s important to be clear what they’re saying.

What they are saying is that they believe Israel should murder children, decapitate them, rip their guts out, dismember them, mutilate them, burn them alive, every single day, until its military demands are submitted to. They are also probably saying that they personally would help Israel do these things to children if circumstances permitted.

They are saying they are fully on board with killing, decapitating, eviscerating, dismembering, mutilating and incinerating small children every day until the hostages are released.

They are saying this despite the mountains upon mountains of evidence that what’s being done in Gaza has nothing whatsoever to do with releasing the hostages.

They are saying this despite the mountains upon mountains of evidence that the IDF has been killing and injuring Israeli hostages with its attacks on Gaza.

They are saying this despite the mountains upon mountains of evidence that Netanyahu is doing everything he can to sabotage a hostage deal while the genocide in Gaza continues.

They are saying this despite the fact that Israel holds thousands of Palestinians hostage under “administrative detention” without due process, and while Israel holds millions of Palestinians hostage in the giant extermination camp known as Gaza.

And they are saying this despite the mountains upon mountains of evidence that Israeli forces are raping, mutilating and torturing Palestinian hostages in torture dungeons as a matter of policy.

It’s important to be aware that this is what they are saying because it’s important to be aware of who Israel’s defenders and supporters really are. These are not normal people. These are not people with healthy minds, with functioning empathy centers in their brains. There is something deeply, profoundly wrong with who they are and how they are.

It’s important to be aware of this because otherwise you might fall into the trap of thinking this issue must be more complicated than it looks, and the interpretation of what we are seeing in Gaza must be a matter of subjective opinion. No, that’s not true at all. What’s happening in Gaza is very simple and straightforward, and is exactly what it immediately and obviously looks like to anyone who beholds it through the lens of conscience and basic human empathy.

The reason for all the debate and disagreement you are seeing about Gaza has nothing to do with complexity or nuance, and everything to do with some very warped and damaged minds lacking the fundamental faculties that cause normal people to care about other human beings.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/08 ... -hostages/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply