Palestine

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 30, 2024 11:32 am

Image
White phosphorus fired by Israeli army to create a smoke screen, is seen on the Israel-Lebanon border in northern Israel, November 12, 2023. (Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein)

Gaza breakdown: 20 times Israel used U.S. arms in likely war crimes
Originally published: Responsible Statecraft on August 26, 2024 by Stephen Semler (more by Responsible Statecraft) (Posted Aug 29, 2024)

The Biden administration recently approved five major arms sales to Israel for F-15 fighter aircraft, tank ammunition, tactical vehicles, air-to-air missiles, mortar rounds, and related equipment for each. Though technically sales, most if not all of this matériel is paid for by U.S. taxpayers–Israel uses much of the military aid Congress approves for it effectively as a gift card to buy U.S.-made weapons.

The total value of the five weapons sales exceeds $20.3 billion.

More extraordinary than the price tag of these arms deals is that the White House made them public. Prior to last week’s announcements, it had disclosed just two arms sales to Israel. By March, the Biden administration had already greenlit more than 100 separate weapons deals for Israel, or about one every 36 hours, on average. The administration presumably kept the value of each arms deal “under threshold” to avoid having to notify Congress.

From 2017 to 2019, the U.S. had approved thousands of below-threshold arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates worth a total of $11.2 billion. Exploiting this loophole helped the Trump administration avoid scrutiny of its enabling of a devastating and indiscriminate bombing campaign in Yemen. The Biden administration appears to be following the same playbook for the destruction it is enabling in Gaza.

The White House isn’t shy about publicizing arms transfers to other countries. For example, it has been very transparent about the military aid it sent Ukraine since February 2022. Biden promotes arming Ukraine as industrial policy, marketing the military aid as a boon for domestic manufacturing and jobs. The Pentagon not only itemizes what specific matériel the U.S. sends to Ukraine, but also shows on a map where in the U.S. those weapons and equipment are made.

By contrast, nearly all the publicly available information on U.S. arms transfers to Israel comes from leaks reported by the media. The Biden administration says very little about the weapons it delivers to Israel or how the Israeli military uses them. The following analysis is intended to shed light on both. In doing so, it helps explain why the Biden administration prefers to arm Israel in secret.

What follows is a non-exhaustive list of attacks by the Israeli military since October 7 that likely violated international law, grouped by the type of U.S.-supplied weapon involved in the attack.

In order for an attack to be listed below, there must be sufficient evidence that it violated international law. In all of the following cases, it’s at least more likely than not that the attack was a violation. Many of them almost certainly were in breach of international law. This is a very high threshold–as former State Department lawyer Brian Finucane wrote in Foreign Affairs,

The law of war permits vast death and destruction. This is true even under restrictive interpretations of the law.

Furthermore, in order for an attack to be listed, there must be concrete forensic evidence that a U.S.-supplied weapon was likely used to commit the probable violation of international law. Only the types of weapons the U.S. has reportedly delivered to Israel since October 7 are considered. This report draws from forensic investigations that have been conducted by reputable international organizations, civil society groups, media outlets, and independent analysts.

The following 20 incidents represent a small fraction of potential war crimes committed with U.S.-provided weapons. First, information gathering and fact finding is extremely difficult. Israel restricts U.N. and NGO access to Gaza and doesn’t cooperate with investigations into misuse of U.S.-supplied arms. Members of the press are routinely denied access or attacked: Since October 2023, 116 journalists and media workers have been killed by Israeli airstrikes or sniper fire in Gaza, representing 86 percent of all those killed worldwide, according to data from the Committee to Protect Journalists. Prolonged communication blackouts are commonplace in Gaza.

Second, Israel’s military campaign relies on U.S. weapons, and so U.S. matériel is involved in nearly every facet of Israel’s campaign. For example, Israel uses U.S.-made aircraft like the F-35, F-16, and F-15 to drop U.S.-made bombs, including the MK-84 (2,000 pounds), MK-83 (1,000 pounds), MK-82 (500 pounds), and 250-pound “small diameter” bombs, which can be fitted with U.S.-made Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) guidance kits.

The vast majority of bombs Israel drops on Gaza are U.S.-made. The U.S. even provides Israel with jet fuel. The U.S. has sent so many arms to Israel since October 7 that the Pentagon has struggled to find sufficient cargo aircraft to deliver the matériel.

Third, Israel’s campaign is historically destructive. In the three weeks after October 7, Israel dropped an average of 6,000 bombs on Gaza per week. By comparison, U.S. and coalition forces dropped on average 488 bombs per week on ISIS militants in Iraq and Syria during Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR) between August 2014 and March 2019. OIR caused immense civilian harm–particularly in densely-populated areas like Mosul and Raqqa–but the scale of death and destruction doesn’t come close to what Israel has done in Gaza.

A former high-ranking officer in the Israeli military told Haaretz that Israeli forces could have made as much progress as they have so far in Gaza with one-tenth of the destruction. This “unusually wasteful” and “reckless” conduct “reflects an absolute assumption that the U.S. will continue to arm and finance it,” he is quoted as saying.

What’s more, according to reporting, Israel has used an Artificial Intelligence program called “Lavender” to generate an unprecedented number of bombing targets with minimal human oversight. The AI program is coded with instructions that appear inconsistent with international law and is deployed with little to no human oversight.

The Biden administration acknowledges that Israel likely broke human rights law with U.S.-supplied weapons, but claims it doesn’t have enough evidence to link U.S.-supplied weapons to specific violations that would warrant cutting off military aid to Israel. As national security adviser Jake Sullivan told CBS,

We do not have enough information to reach definitive conclusions about particular incidents or to make legal determinations, but we do have enough information to have concern…Our hearts break about the loss of innocent Palestinian life.

None of that is believable. As this report demonstrates, there is more than enough available information. If the Biden administration is truly concerned about the loss of innocent Palestinian life in Gaza, it can stop Israel’s atrocities by denying it the tools it needs to commit them.

MK-84 and other 2,000-pound bombs
Amount delivered since October 7: At least 14,100 (as of June 28). The U.S. sent Israel at least 14,000 MK-84 2,000-pound bombs from early October to late June. Another shipment 1,800 MK-84s is pending: The White House approved their transfer in March, but then paused shipping them in May. The U.S. also delivered 100 2,000-pound BLU-109 bunker-buster bombs between October 7 and December 1.

By mid-December, the Biden administration had already provided Israel with more than 5,000 MK-84 2,000-pound bombs, four times heavier than the largest bombs the U.S. dropped in Syria and Iraq in its war against ISIS. In the first month of its military offensive in Gaza, Israeli forces dropped more than 500 2,000-pound bombs, more than 40 percent of which were dropped in Israeli-designated safe zones. Six weeks into the war, Israel had dropped 2,000-pound bombs in areas to which it had instructed civilians to flee more than 200 times.

October 9, 2023: Israeli airstrikes hit a busy market in Jabalia refugee camp, killing at least 69 people. The market was more crowded than usual because people were in the process of fleeing their homes at the instruction of the Israeli military. The U.N. Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) analysis reported that “one or two GBU-31 air dropped munitions were used” and found no military objective to justify the strike. The GBU-31 is made from a U.S.-made 2,000-pound MK 84 or BLU-109 bomb and a JDAM guidance kit. Neither U.N. OHCHR nor Amnesty International found evidence of a military target at the time of the attack. Even if there was a legitimate military target, the scale of destruction indicates the Israeli military’s attack was disproportionate. Disproportionate attacks are war crimes–international law prohibits attacks that are expected to cause excessive civilian harm compared to the direct and provable military advantage anticipated from the attack.
October 17, 2023: After the Israeli military told Gazans to flee to Khan Yunis for their safety, it bombed the al-Lamdani family house in Khan Yunis. Between 15 and 40 people were killed in the attack. Remnants of a U.S.-made MK-84 2,000-pound bomb were found at the site
October 25, 2023: Israeli airstrikes flattened at least 5,700 square meters in the Al Yarmouk neighborhood of Gaza City, killing at least 91 people, including 39 children. A U.N. assessment determined that “several” 2,000-pound GBU-31s air-dropped munitions were likely dropped by Israeli forces in the attack. According to a report from U.N. OHCHR, “The use of a GBU-31 or a GBU-32, in such densely populated areas in the middle of residential neighborhoods when extensive civilian harm would be foreseeable, raises very serious concerns that those attacks were disproportionate and/or indiscriminate, and that no or insufficient precautions were taken.”
October 31, 2023: After Israeli airstrikes on Jabalia, Gaza’s largest refugee camp, a nearby hospital said it received 400 casualties, including 120 dead, most of whom were women and children. An analysis of the site showed at least five craters, the largest one likely from a GBU-31. The GBU-31 is made from a JDAM and either a 2,000-pound BLU-109 or MK-84 bomb. According to reports, Israeli forces gave no warning before the attack, and no effort was made to evacuate the residential buildings. U.N. OHCHR said the attack on Jabalia refugee camp could amount to a war crime.
January 13, 2024: Israeli forces dropped a U.S.-made MK-84 2,000-pound bomb from a U.S.-made F-16 aircraft on a house in Deir al-Balah but it didn’t explode. A second airstrike did destroy the home, leaving an approximately 40-foot size crater, characteristic of a 2,000-pound bomb with a delayed fuse. The Israeli military had designated Deir al-Balah as a safe zone in October. Israeli forces instructed Palestinians in northern Gaza to flee there on December 11 and told Palestinians in central Gaza the same thing on December 22. By mid-January, Israeli bombing had leveled entire city blocks and dozens of family homes in Deir al-Balah.
GBU-39 and other ‘small diameter’ bombs
Amount delivered since October: At least 2,600 (as of June). More than 2,000 of these “small-diameter” bombs are 250-pound GBU-39 munitions. After Israel received an expedited shipment of 1,000 Boeing-made GBU-39s in early October, the Biden administration approved the transfer of more than 1,000 GBU-39 bombs for Israel on April 1, the same day that Israeli forces bombed a World Central Kitchen convoy, killing seven aid workers. It’s likely that far more GBU-39s have been delivered to Israel than the amount listed here.

Purportedly out of concern for Palestinian civilians, the Biden administration is urging the Israeli military to use more 250-pound GBU-39s and fewer less-precise 2,000-pound bombs. The result appears to have been a surge in possible war crimes committed with GBU-39s. The relative size of bombs doesn’t matter much if Israeli forces disregard fundamental rules governing targeting in international law, including distinction, precautions, and proportionality. As retired U.S. Air Force master sergeant Wes Bryant told the New York Times,

While they’re using smaller bombs, they’re still deliberately targeting where they know there are civilians.

Boeing markets its GBU-39 as a “low collateral damage” precision weapon. Echoing Boeing, White House spokesperson John Kirby said Israel’s use of these 250-pound bombs is “certainly indicative of an effort to be discreet and targeted and precise.” The blast from a GBU-39 bomb can kill or injure people over 1,000 feet away, and shrapnel from the bomb’s steel casing can kill or injure anyone within 570 feet.

January 9, 2024: Israeli forces bombed a residential building in a neighborhood the Israeli military had repeatedly ordered displaced Gazans to flee to. The attack killed 18 people, including 10 children, and wounded at least eight others. Israeli forces gave no warning to evacuate. An investigation found no evidence that the building or anyone in it could be considered a legitimate military target. The Israeli government has yet to give a reason for the strike. Fragments from a U.S.-made Boeing GBU-39 were recovered from the rubble.
May 13, 2024: Israeli forces bombed a school housing displaced civilians in Nuseirat, killing up to 30 people. A tail fin of a U.S.-made GBU-39 was recovered at the location of the strike

Image
Photo: @AlQastalps

May 26, 2024: An Israeli airstrike on a displacement camp in Rafah filled with makeshift tents killed at least 46 people–including 23 women, children and older adults–and injured more than 240 others. The tail of a U.S.-made GBU-39 bomb was recovered at the site of the attack. The “81873” on the munition fragment is the identifier code the U.S. government assigned to Woodward, a Colorado-based manufacturer that supplies bomb parts, including the GBU-39. The State Department refused to acknowledge that this was a U.S.-made weapon. Israeli forces claimed munitions stored at the camp caused most of the devastation, but there is no evidence of a weapons cache present.

Image
Photo: @trbrtc/Alam Sadeq

June 6, 2024: At least two GBU-39 munitions were used in an Israeli airstrike on the UN-run al-Sardi school in Nusreit, central Gaza. At least 40 people were killed in the strike, including nine women and 14 children. About 6,000 displaced Palestinians were sheltering at the school when it was bombed. The Israeli military denied that there were any civilian casualties. Israeli human rights group B’Tselem said the attack is a possible war crime. A U.S.-made navigation device manufactured by Honeywell was also documented at the site.
August 10, 2024: More than 100 Palestinians were killed in an Israeli airstrike on al-Tabin school in Gaza City, which was being used to shelter displaced people. The Israeli military said it used “precise munitions.” Paramedics who arrived at the scene said they found bodies “ripped to pieces” and that many bodies were unidentifiable. Parents reported difficulty identifying their deceased children. Remnants of at least two Boeing-made GBU-39 small diameter bombs were identified at the scene. Two investigations found no evidence that the school was being used for military operations, as the Israeli military claimed. The list of fighters the Israeli army alleged it killed in the strike included several people who had previously been listed as deceased and civilians with no known military ties.

Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM)
Amount delivered since October 7: At least 3,000 (as of December 1).

October 10, 2023: An Israeli airstrike on the al-Najjar family home in Deir al-Balah killed 24 civilians. The code stamped on a recovered munition fragment, 70P862352, indicates that a U.S.-supplied JDAM was used in the attack. The Boeing-made guidance kit was likely fitted to a 2,000-pound bomb. Survivors said Israel gave civilians no warning of an imminent strike. Amnesty International said the attack must be investigated as a war crime.

Image
Photo: Private/Amnesty International

October 22, 2023: An Israeli airstrike on the Abu Mu’eileq family home in Deir al-Balah killed 19 people, including 12 children. The home was located in the area to which the Israeli military had ordered residents of northern Gaza to flee on October 13. The code stamped on the recovered scrap, 70P862352, is associated with JDAMs and Boeing. The Boeing-made JDAM kit was fitted to a bomb that weighed at least 1,000-pounds. Survivors said Israel gave no warning of an imminent strike. Amnesty International said the attack must be investigated as a war crime.

Image
Photo: Private/Amnesty International

March 27, 2024: An Israeli strike on the Emergency and Relief Corps of the Lebanese Succour Association, a humanitarian organization, killed seven emergency and relief volunteers in southern Lebanon. The strike used a U.S.-made JDAM guidance kit affixed to an Israeli-made 500-pound bomb. Human Rights Watch said that the incident should be investigated as a war crime.
July 13, 2024: An Israeli strike on the Al-Mawasi–an Israeli military-designated “safe zone”–killed over 90 people and injured hundreds more. Remnants of a U.S.-made JDAM were found at the scene. Based on the size of the fin fragment, the JDAM was likely fitted to either a 1,000- or 2,000-pound bomb.

Hellfire missiles
Amount delivered: At least 3,000 (as of June 28)

June 8, 2024: Israel’s operation to rescue four hostages in the Nuseirat refugee camp in central Gaza killed nearly 300 Palestinians. A witness reported Israeli attack helicopters launching many strikes in Nuseirat and surrounding areas. Another witness said 150 rockets fell in less than 10 minutes. Remnants of at least two U.S.-made Hellfire missiles were found in a damaged residential building. Video shows U.S.-made Apache helicopters firing several Hellfire missiles into the Nuseirat refugee camp. The Israeli military also bombed a busy market several blocks south of where the Israeli hostages were kept, and in the opposite direction of the evacuation route. U.N. OHCHR said the raid “seriously calls into question whether the principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution–as set out under the laws of war–were respected by the Israeli forces.”
June 23, 2024: An Israeli airstrike on a health clinic in Gaza City killed five people, including Hani al-Jaafarawi, Gaza’s director of ambulances and emergency. He was reportedly the 500th medical worker killed during Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The rocket motor of a U.S.-supplied Hellfire missile was recovered at the health care center.
July 14, 2024: Hundreds of Palestinians were taking refuge at the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) Abu Oraiban school when it was hit by an Israeli airstrike, killing at least 22 people. The Israeli military issued no warning to the displaced people sheltering there before the attack. U.S.-made Hellfire missile fragments were found at the school, including part of its guidance system and motor. (Remnants of a Boeing-made GBU-39’s tail section were also recovered at the site.)

Image
Photo: @Easybakeovensz

120mm tank shells
Amount delivered since October 7: At least 13,981. A day after the U.S. vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and the unconditional release of hostages, the White House notified Congress on December 8 that it had approved the sale of 13,981 120mm M830A1 high-explosive tank cartridges to Israel.

The Biden administration invoked an emergency authority to bypass the congressional review period. Because the shells were sourced from U.S. Army inventory, they could be transferred immediately to Israel.

The day before, Reuters, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International all published investigations providing evidence that an Israeli tank likely deliberately fired two Israeli-made 120mm shells at a group of journalists in southern Lebanon in October, killing one Reuters journalist and injuring six others. Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International said the incident was an apparent war crime. Israeli tanks have also struck hospitals and humanitarian shelters using 120mm tank rounds. On August 13, the Biden administration notified Congress that it approved a $774 million arms sale to Israel for 32,739 120mm tank cartridges.

January 29, 2024: Six-year-old Hind Rajab was the only survivor in her family’s car after Israeli tanks opened fire. Over the phone, Hind begged rescue workers to come save her. The Palestine Red Crescent Society dispatched an ambulance with two emergency workers. At least one Israeli tank opened fire, killing both paramedics. A fragment of a U.S.-made M830A1 120mm tank round was documented at the scene.
155mm artillery shells
Amount delivered: At least 57,000 (as of December 1). This total includes thousands of 155mm rounds originally for Ukraine that the Biden administration diverted to Israel in October. Netanyahu specifically requested 155mm artillery shells from U.S. lawmakers in mid-November.

Around the same time, more than 30 organizations urged the Biden administration to not supply Israel with these munitions because their inaccuracy and 100-300 meter casualty radius make them “inherently indiscriminate” in the Gaza context. “It is difficult to imagine a scenario in which high explosive 155mm artillery shells could be used in Gaza in compliance with [international humanitarian law],” the organizations wrote.

On December 29, the White House notified Congress that it approved the sale of an additional 57,021 155mm shells to Israel. The Biden administration invoked an emergency authority to bypass the congressional review period. Israeli forces will likely fire these rounds from U.S.-made howitzers. The Israeli military announced earlier that month it fired over 100,000 artillery rounds during the first 40 days of its ground invasion of Gaza, adding that artillery plays a “central role” by providing “intense fire cover” for its ground forces.

October 16: Israeli forces fired 155mm artillery shells containing white phosphorus into Dhayra, southern Lebanon. At least nine civilians were killed and civilian property was damaged. Lot production codes found on the shells indicate they were made in the U.S. Amnesty International said the attack was indiscriminate and must be investigated as a war crime.

Image
White phosphorus fired by Israeli army to create a smoke screen, is seen on the Israel-Lebanon border in northern Israel, November 12, 2023. (Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein)

Armored vehicles
Amount delivered since October 7: Unknown. The Israeli Ministry of Defense reported on October 19 that U.S. Air Force cargo airplanes delivered the first tranche of U.S.-made David light armored vehicles, part of a $22 million arms deal from April 2023.

November 14, 2023: The first photo below from the Israeli Ministry of Defense shows David light armor vehicles after being unloaded from a U.S. Air Force C-17 at Ben Gurion Airport on October 19. The second photo shows Israeli forces using David light armor vehicles to obstruct an ambulance en route to a hospital on November 14, arresting the wounded person inside. International humanitarian law prohibits attacks on and obstruction of medical transport.

Image
Photo: @Israel_MOD

Image
Photo: @PalestineRCS

https://mronline.org/2024/08/29/gaza-br ... ar-crimes/

******

Image
Students at the University of Vienna protest the genocide in Gaza, May 9, 2024. Source: aa.com.tr

A Punishing Memory Culture
By Kevin Potter (Posted Aug 29, 2024)

The first day of a new semester can be a thrill. I have adrenaline pumping through my entire body and, despite knowing better, I still consume more coffee than I should while my fingers shake visibly from all the nervous energy.

This past semester brought a new set of anxieties. I was, for the second time in my six years of teaching, bringing a class on Palestinian Literature to the University of Vienna. But this time, it’s in a context where the tensions after October 7 are noticeably high. The University of Vienna is, of course, Theodor Herzl’s alma mater and an institution with a troubling history under fascism, but also, more recently, it’s a place where few dare to sound out the word genocide while harrowing images of one in Gaza are beamed into our phones every minute.

By any reasonable metric, the lead-up to this semester was far from normal. The university had already carried out a series of high– and low-profile cancellations and violations of academic freedom. These actions put the University of Vienna on watch from plenty of scholars and observers around the world, but hardly any staff from within the university seemed to notice at all, let alone care.

The nerves I felt on the first day didn’t come from the usual worry that my students might not like me. I was worried instead about proving everyone right who told me I was neither prepared for, nor aware of, the consequences of teaching Palestinian literature in a context that lives with the traumatic legacy of antisemitism. Putting aside the built-in implication that I’m inept at my job and derelict in my engagement with history (a loaded accusation that I’m quite used to), there’s also the uglier assumption that writing or teaching on Palestine automatically entails anti-Jewish racism. I guess it’s easy to assume that when you regard Palestinian life as intrinsically hateful.

Throughout this year, I’ve had to contend with a specific form of ostracism, arising from what Steve Salaita calls the “customs of obedience” in academe. It’s not one where I fear losing my job (for now). It’s one that translates to a profound alienation that makes the day-to-day isolation even more demoralizing. For my part, I found myself in the awkward position of being looked upon with a new brand of suspicion among colleagues with whom I’ve spent the last six years acting as an otherwise decent co-worker: available for committees, generous with my time, and only occasionally given to complaining.

The system of labor discipline looks (only slightly) different in the context of an ostensibly public university. This is a context where the regulatory apparatus is less about courting support from a donor class and more about neutralizing tensions among students and staff, lest they get any ideas in their heads about how universities should actually operate (God forbid they’re held democratically accountable). But the same culture of tone-policing and flattering bourgeois sensibilities is alive and thriving.

For those of us who write about or teach on Palestine, our teaching and scholarship are often considered “too political” (and, therefore, intellectually unrigorous). For whatever pedigrees I achieve, I’m still marked as someone who doesn’t conform to the expectations of professional decorum or respectability.

My encounter with the students, however, tells a different story altogether. They were nothing close to how those who occupy the citadels of government, authority, and administrative power see them—castigating them as a rabble of thoughtless, politically immature bandwagoners. Perhaps when you already arrive with deep-seated contempt and hostility toward students, that’s how they might appear to you.

The students who attended my class, by contrast, were among the most thoughtful, eager, and perceptive minds I’ve come across in years. They treated the topic with intellectual seriousness, avoiding the clichés and platitudes that distract them from analyzing and understanding history, power, war, and occupation. Their commitment to Palestine was rooted in a genuine engagement with history and an abiding interest in critical thought. I had the pleasure of teaching the works of Hala Alyan, Susan Abulhawa, Mohammed El-Kurd, and Atef Abu Shaif, among others, and they did most of the heavy lifting in offering insight and clarity.

Students in the Struggle for Palestine
Before this year, no one before had ever seen this level of effervescent activism around Palestine at the University of Vienna. This fact alone is a disgrace; that it has taken a mass slaughter for there to even be an active student organization for Palestine is nothing to be proud of, knowing that the Palestine tragedy did not begin in October 2023. The first three months of 2023 alone were among the deadliest in the West Bank since the Second Intifada.

Nevertheless, the students learned quickly that their university leadership was never going to provide them a chance to engage with Palestine’s history, to understand the martyrdom of Gaza, and the broad political structure that enables their ethnic cleansing. Even faculty-led efforts to offer teach-ins, workshops, and lecture series (some of which I was involved in) were met with egregious forms of censorship. As a result, some of the most intrepid and passionate people I’ve ever known took matters into their own hands, creating a new space for Palestinian solidarity where it never existed before.

This dynamic is emblematic of what has always undergirded political, discursive struggle, especially when it happens at a university, which is why administrators and overseers are panicking. Universities have historically been sites of political struggle. Students are challenging the status quo, putting the Zionist consensus on trial, and rejecting the university’s campaign to obscure its own complicity in propping up apartheid.

The encampment on our campus, inspired by those in the United States, United Kingdom, and around the world, lasted only two days. The Vienna police summarily (and violently) evicted them on the spurious basis that they were promoting terrorism.

To say that these accusations and other smears were not only false, but also offensive, is far too obvious a statement to make. The short two hours that I spent at the Students for the Palestine Cause encampment—where I had the honor of leading a teach-in on the 1982 invasion of Lebanon and its attending literary context—taught me something special. I discovered the electrifying power of solidarity, generated from those whose commitment to Palestinian liberation extends from the humanistic concern for everyone, no matter who they are. The integrity and camaraderie I witnessed put the university’s purported concerns for safety to shame. The students wanted safety and care; it was instead the university and the powers that be who sought to discipline them through terror and intimidation.

Absolution for the Crimes of their Ancestors
The immediate response from colleagues when I mention my Palestinian Literature course is to ask how I handle antisemitism. After all, you can’t walk down any street in Vienna for more than five minutes without coming across reminders of the Nazi Anschluss and the horrors of fascist deportations. The anxiety and impact of antisemitism permeate the entire cityscape.

This ambient sense of guilt fits into the larger structure of memory culture (Erinnerungskultur) throughout Germany and Austria. Historian Samuel Clowes Huneke documents the historic process whereby this Erinnerungskultur in Germany eventually “calcified,” producing “a set of rituals progressively hollowed of the critical edge they were originally intended to wield.” Huneke stresses how this was especially the case when it came to Israel, where the “country’s recognition of its historic responsibility to prevent genocide slowly hardened into Merkel’s 2008 formula that ‘the security of Israel’ is the German ‘Staatsräson,’ the reason for the state of Germany to exist.”

In Austria, this commitment to memory culture contains similar traits, including the memorials, exhibitions, and Stolpersteine that are installed throughout major cities. As my colleague Birgit Englert points out, only one year after Germany passed anti-Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions resolutions, Austria followed suit, producing the very same instruments for undermining solidarity with and public discussion of Palestine. Unsurprisingly, this has led to an environment where scholars who teach about and research Palestine are pushed to the margins.

The differences are, however, striking, given Austria’s rather late arrival at acknowledging its shared responsibility for the Holocaust. Once positioned as “the first victim of Nazi aggression,” Austria has since proceeded to recognize its distinct role in enabling that aggression. This shift crystallized after the so-called Waldheim Affair, in which then-candidate for president in 1986, Kurt Waldheim, was exposed for having been a Wehrmacht officer during the Second World War. Then, in the early 1990s, Chancellor Franz Vranitzky acknowledged Austria’s part in the war, once in front of Parliament and once again in Jerusalem. After this moment, as Noga Sagi notes, “the new official Austrian narrative of co-responsibility was warmly welcomed by Israel.” The bilateral, diplomatic relations between Austria and Israel required that Austria acknowledge its past and help secure “the memory discourse between the two countries.”

The belated acknowledgment of its Nazi past and its sought-after diplomatic alliance with Israel turbo-charged its investment in and panic around memory culture. As a result, Austrian society took on the incoherent image of a place that at once seeks to emulate Germany, while also simultaneously distinguishing itself through its supposedly “neutral” (read: opportunistic) stance in times of war. This facile (and ultimately unconvincing) impartiality becomes a miniature farce of itself when the University of Vienna justifies the censorship of its own researchers and staff.

No serious thinking person believes that this traumatic history and memory of antisemitism should deter us from showing concern for the Palestinian struggle. But we’re not talking about serious thinkers. We’re talking about those who care more about seeking absolution for the crimes of their ancestors than they do about recognizing a large-scale genocide as it’s happening at this very moment. We should refuse to offer them absolution on this basis, just as we should refuse to accept that the people of Gaza should die for them to achieve it. The breathless support for Israel’s scorched-earth campaign has shattered any image the Austrian establishment has conjured of peace or justice, and permanently damaged any claim to atonement for a genocidal past.

Furthermore, the university and the wider ecosystem of Zionist apologists routinely compromise the safety of Jewish activists who put their bodies and lives on the line for the Palestinian cause. They dismiss the Jewish anti-Zionists who fervently reject the effort to instrumentalize their pain, memory, and identity in support of a genocide. If we’re looking for a better way to assuage our guilt and correct past crimes, then we needn’t look any further than the materialist struggle against class rule and the forces of dispossession—an insight we inherit from one of the greatest Palestinian novelists, Ghassan Kanafani.

At the same time, the fact that this context once produced Herzl and still by and large embraces the modern Zionist tradition tells us something even more sinister than the pathological need for guilt-alleviation. It tells us that Aimé Césaire was more correct than he could have known: that the collective shame felt among Europeans doesn’t stem from the fact that the Holocaust happened; it’s that, to them, its cruelty was supposed to be reserved for the wretched beyond their borders, not brought home to their own backyard. Right now, the vicious tools of genocidal racism, perfected since before the Age of Empire, are being put to use against the already-besieged population of Gaza with the permission and complicity of the European establishment. Here in Austria, many are happy to act and speak in the service of an explicitly imperial project, so long as they can ignore its horrific effects from a distance.

Lessons Learned
I worry for students who aren’t accustomed to these conditions. While I’m used to people rolling their eyes at me, the students probably feel insane. They spend only ninety minutes per week reading about Palestine and the rest of their week hearing from politicians, journalists, and other teachers that everything I’m teaching them is actually “too complicated and too complex” to have an opinion on. This pattern of nuance-mongering and placatory “both-sides”-isms is deployed to the shameful discredit of universities everywhere, but especially in the German-speaking world.

If you listen to the university’s leadership, you’d hear them express concern that a lecture or event on Palestine might create a hostile educational environment. I’ve learned to interpret this canard as a fear that students might actually demand better from their institution and its instructors. It’s a fear that students could be led to believe that those entrusted with knowledge-production should also model moral courage and critical thinking. But lest they get any ideas of that sort in their heads, the university ensures instead that an environment of distrust and paranoia keeps them expecting and hoping for less and less.

https://mronline.org/2024/08/29/a-punis ... y-culture/

******

Palestinian factions call for mobilization in defense of West Bank as clashes rage

Several West Bank resistance factions are currently confronting Israeli troops in the camps and streets of Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas

News Desk

AUG 28, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

The Committee of National and Islamic Forces in Gaza, consisting of Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement, and several other factions, has called on all Palestinian people to confront the ongoing Israeli attack on the occupied West Bank.

“This aggression is an extension of the war of extermination and displacement against the Palestinian people and their land,” the committee said in a statement, adding that the “resistance is steadfast and will thwart the occupation’s goals.”

The committee mourned those who were killed in the West Bank on 27 August. It also called on the Palestinian Authority (PA) and its affiliated security services to “carry out its duties to protect the Palestinian people” and “take the initiative to the field of honor and dignity and confront the Zionists and their settler gangs.”

It called on all Palestinians to “mobilize for a general confrontation and open engagement with the enemy to defend the land and identity and support our people in the northern West Bank.”

In a separate statement, Hamas called on every Palestinian “in every place in our occupied land” to escalate resistance against Israel.

The Israeli army launched its largest operation in the occupied West Bank in over two decades early on 28 August, raiding Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas with hundreds of troops and launching airstrikes on the three cities, considered major hotbeds of resistance in the territory.

At least nine Palestinians have been killed since the operation – dubbed “Camps of Summer” – began. The operation is expected to last several days.


Israel’s Foreign Minister has called for forced evacuations of civilians across the West Bank, as has been done in Gaza.

According to Palestinian journalist Azzam Abu al-Adas, Israeli forces turned a shop in the Faraa camp near Tubas into a detention and interrogation center.

The West Bank branches of Hamas’ Qassam Brigades and the PIJ’s Quds Brigades, as well as the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and other groups, have been confronting the Israeli army in the camps of Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas since the incursions started at midnight on Tuesday.

“Our fighters, in coordination with other resistance factions, are engaged in fierce clashes to repel the ongoing occupation aggression in the Faraa camp (near Tubas), Tulkarem, and Jenin. They are targeting enemy forces and their vehicles with machine guns and explosive devices, achieving direct hits,” the Qassam Brigades’ West Bank branch said in a statement on Wednesday afternoon.

The Quds Brigades Jenin branch, known as the Jenin Brigade, said in a statement that it “targeted enemy forces and military reinforcements with a high-explosive device, and our heroes continue to target enemy forces with heavy barrages of bullets, achieving direct hits.”

Footage on social media showed an Israeli army bulldozer in Jenin being struck by an explosive device.

Unconfirmed reports state that an Israeli soldier was wounded by the resistance in the Faraa camp south of Tubas.

https://thecradle.co/articles/palestini ... ashes-rage

‘Karbala is the path to Al-Aqsa’: an Iraq diary

Iraq’s prime minister hosted a unique conference in Baghdad during the 21 million-strong Arbaeen march, linking the seventh-century murder of Imam Hussain in Karbala to Israel’s current genocide of Palestinians.


Pepe Escobar

AUG 29, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

BAGHDAD and KARBALA – Arriving in Baghdad today comes as an electric shock to any visitor who remembers recent, somber Iraqi history.

There are virtually no checkpoints, apart from sensitive government areas. None of those ghastly cement blocks from the time of the American occupation, forcing a slow slalom every few minutes. No sense of unpredictable danger capable of striking at any minute. Lush greenery thrives all over the capital city. Haifa Street has been rebuilt practically from scratch. Bustling commerce, from non-stop action in Karrada to a complex of restaurants by the Tigris called (most appropriately) Thousand and One Nights.

After over three decades of unspeakable horrors inflicted on the cradle of civilization, for the first time, Baghdad exudes a sense of normalcy. This has much to do with the new administration, led by Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, that has been in power for just over two years.

Last week, the Office of the Prime Minister sponsored a unique conference titled The Road to Al-Aqsa Flood, inviting popular bloggers and influencers from the Arab world – Palestine, Kuwait, Jordan, Sudan, and Lebanon, among others – and only a few westerners. The bloggers were all young; most had never been to Iraq and, thus, had no memories of Shock and Awe and the occupation – at best, some hazy recollection of the ISIS years. They were all stunned by the hospitality, the dynamism, and, most of all, the hope now firmly embedded in Baghdad life.

The Iraqi government actually came up with a titillating concept, tying a serious discussion about all aspects of today’s ongoing Palestinian tragedy not only to Baghdad but to Arbaeen in Karbala.

Arbaeen marks the 40th day after Ashura, the Shia rite to honor the martyrdom of Hussein Ibn Ali, the Prophet Muhammad’s grandson, who was brutally murdered alongside his entire family by the Umayyad Caliph Yazid Ibn Muawiya. For Shia Muslims, this dishonorable slaughter represents the ultimate embodiment of injustice and betrayal, considered foundational evils by the religious sect.

It’s all about Resistance – without explicitly mentioning the Axis of Resistance. The martyrdom of Imam Hussein at the Battle of Karbala was – in Baghdad today – directly tied to the ongoing Israeli genocide of tens of thousands of Palestinians, in a “twenty-first-century Karbala.”

Twenty-one million walking pilgrims

Flying right before sunset on a Soviet helicopter from a military base by the Tigris in Baghdad to a mini-base in Karbala, some 10 kilometers away from the magnificent Hazrat Abbas shrine, is an astonishing experience.

Irrepressible commander Tahsin, in Karbala, had ordered the pilot to follow the Arbaeen pilgrim route – one of the multiple axes crisscrossing Iraq and leading to the shrine.

The feeling is of a long cinematic traveling shot. Rows and rows of pilgrims, mostly dressed in black, with their backpacks, carrying banners, walking at a steady pace, going through a collection of stalls, resting places, and mini-restaurants, mingling with volunteers offering free water bottles and free drinks to quench the thirst on this spiritual, yet, arduous journey during a scorching Iraqi summer.

As we approach Karbala, the crowd gets much thicker. It’s a sort of community spirit moveable feast. Spontaneous chants pop up, punctuated by infectious rhythm, and above all, there’s this relentless drive to keep walking, to try get as close to the shrine as possible.

We are told it’s absolutely out of the question to approach the shrine – the road is jam-packed, body pressed upon body. So the next best option is somewhere five kilometers away: a sort of mini-Palestine compound featuring an exhibition of military feats from Gaza, a space for lectures, a mini-mosque, a small replica of Al-Aqsa and even a road sign: “Al-Aqsa Mosque, 833 km.”

That couldn’t be more graphic: the Karbala–Al-Aqsa connection, at the heart of Arbaeen. It’s like the spirit of Imam Hussein veiling over every soul along these 833 kilometers.

This compound has been one of the focal points of this year’s commemoration. The flow of pilgrims from all over the Muslim world is relentless – and many stop to pay their respects. Nearby, commander Tahsin introduces us to a hard-as-nails anti-ISIS fighter from the Anbar province, who now supervises an Iraqi kebab stall, making delicious food for free, “in the spirit of Imam Hussein.”

Flying back to Baghdad at night, the pilot circles around the dazzling lights of the Hazrat Abbas Shrine – a spectacle worthy of a remixed One Thousand and One Nights. Later, the shrine’s management would confirm that an astonishing 21.4 million pilgrims had come to Karbala for Arbaeen.

Meeting al-Sudani

Prime Minister Sudani receives the foreign guests for a special meeting at one of those proverbially monumental marble-filled Saddam-era palaces inside Baghdad’s protected Green Zone.

Cool, calm, collected, he talks authoritatively not only about the Palestinian plight, but on his vision for a stable nation, detailing his “Iraq First” policy. It’s about sustainable development; investments in education and new technology; an affirmation of sovereignty; and in foreign policy, an extremely careful balancing act, juggling the US, the EU, Russia, China and Arab/Muslim partners.

A suggestion is made for Iraq to go to the next level and consider applying to join BRICS. PM Sudani duly takes notes.

The message is clear: Iraq is finally on the road to stability and normalcy. Earlier, a government official had observed, “Daesh [ISIS] set us back many years. Otherwise, we would have made even more progress.”

According to Dr Hussein Allawi, a top adviser to the Prime Minister, ISIS has been reduced to, at best, a few hundred fighters on the fringes of the Syrian–Iraqi desert, protected by local tribes. The threat seems to be finally contained, despite US efforts to exaggerate it.

But what gets Allawi really excited are the ramifications of the “Iraq First” policy – and an array of investment possibilities ahead. On energy, for instance, China buys nearly half of Iraq’s oil production; is a leading operator in several oil fields; and even diversifies in projects such as oil-for-schools, helping Baghdad on the education front.

Iraq is at the forefront of China’s ambitious, multi-trillion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in West Asia. The key focus is on the $17 billion Strategic Development Road: a transport corridor from Basra to Western Europe, to be finished by 2028, eventually to be connected to BRI – a route that will ultimately prove much cheaper and faster than the existing Suez one.

A visit to Abu Hanifa Mosque seals the Coming of the New Baghdad. This is where the first massive anti-occupation, Sunni-Shia march started in 2003, only nine days after the US-engineered fall of Saddam Hussein’s statue in Tahrir Square. The bombed-out minaret has been rebuilt, the mosque is now in impeccable condition, and an annex featuring precious Sufi objects has been sponsored by a Turkish cultural foundation.

The cradle of civilization is slowly but surely being reborn.

https://thecradle.co/articles/karbala-i ... iraq-diary

******

Image

Washington’s Israel Policy Is Just Feigning Ignorance Of Israeli Depravity

It’s so unfair how Israel’s neighbors keep attacking it completely unprovoked while Israel is just innocently minding its own business trying to commit a little genocide in peace.

Caitlin Johnstone
August 29, 2024



It’s so unfair how Israel’s neighbors keep attacking it completely unprovoked while Israel is just innocently minding its own business trying to commit a little genocide in peace.



Activists: Israel couldn’t continue killing Gaza without US weapons

Experts: Israel couldn’t continue killing Gaza without US weapons

Israel: We couldn’t continue killing Gaza without US weapons

Biden-Harris: [sends US weapons to Israel]

Biden-Harris: The killing in Gaza must not continue!



Israeli insiders keep very straightforwardly acknowledging that an arms embargo would bring an end to their genocidal atrocities. Biden and Harris oppose an arms embargo because they want those genocidal atrocities to continue.



The US knows Israel has nuclear weapons but simply pretends it does not know this.

The US knows it’s Netanyahu sabotaging a peace deal but simply pretends Hamas is the real obstacle.

The US knows Israel is committing genocide but simply pretends that saying this is antisemitic.

The US knows Israel is deliberately targeting civilians but simply pretends to believe it is exclusively targeting Hamas.

The US knows Israel is committing war crimes in Gaza which make it illegal to send them weapons, but simply pretends it hasn’t seen solid evidence of this.

The US knows Israel will never agree to a two-state solution but simply pretends to believe a two-state solution is right around the corner.

The US knows there can never be peace and stability in the middle east as long as Israel exists in the way that it exists, but simply refuses to acknowledge this self-evident fact.

US policy on Israel is to simply refuse to acknowledge self-evident realities which can be immediately observed with the naked eye. It’s pretending to believe up is down, day is night, and a spade is a pineapple, while privately knowing that none of these things are the case. It maintains the status quo through narrative control, and it maintains narrative control through tenaciously feigned ignorance.



A lot of liberals say things like “I support the Palestinians AND Israel!”

Yeah me too man, I always support both the victim and the victimizer. I support the battered wife AND the wife beater. I support the molested child AND the child molester. When I watch Schindler’s List I cheer for the Jews AND the Nazis.



Right wing translation guide:

“this is communism” = “this is capitalists doing capitalism”

“this is Marxism” = “this is capitalists doing capitalism”

neo-Marxist = capitalists doing capitalism

globalists = capitalists doing capitalism

technocrats = capitalists doing capitalism



One thing I think about sometimes is the absolute certainty that undiagnosed psychopaths and sociopaths enlist to serve in conflict zones for the purpose of acting out their sadistic fantasies. I’m sure most of the abuses we see in places like Gaza have mundane systemic explanations like the fact that Zionists are indoctrinated from birth to see Palestinians as less than human, but I’m also sure there are people who’ve volunteered to participate in this genocide because they just want to inflict pain and death on other human beings.

I’m sure this is happening in Gaza, and I’m sure this happens in all instances of mass military violence. A war zone is a collapse in law and order where might makes right and whoever has the guns makes the rules. People who normally wouldn’t risk imprisonment for acting out their fantasies of torture and murder have the opportunity during wartime to become one of the people with the guns who make the rules. They have a helpless population at their fingertips to whom they can do anything they like.

War is the worst thing in the world. It’s the most insane thing humans do. So, so much of the trauma and dysfunction of our species are the lingering reverberations from wars which ended decades ago, passed down from generation to generation by soldiers returning home and by civilians who’ve been subjected to unfathomable abuse by those who found themselves free to do anything they want to them.



It’s obnoxious that more western artists don’t denounce the west-backed genocide in Gaza and other western atrocities, but more than this it’s obnoxious that they don’t make it central to their art. When you live in the heart of a murderous dystopian civilization, as an artist you’ve been handed the gift of actually having something to say that’s worth saying. But hardly anyone does.

Most of our art completely ignores the true nature of the freakish hellscape we find ourselves in (or even actually runs cover for it), preferring to make pretty shapes and catchy jingles over actually confronting the giant murder machine right in front of them. Poets write poems about poetry. Hip hop artists rap about rapping. Novelists tell the trillionth story of a budding young romance. Pop artists write songs about what a great time they’re having in this nightmarish freak show and how much cool stuff they own. Screenwriters — the worst of all — type out scripts normalizing the abuses of capitalism and imperialism by depicting everyone doing basically fine under status quo systems and telling heroic stories about western soldiers, cops and spies.

Art can be used to open eyes, but most western artists spend their lives working instead to close them. And of course this is because artists are themselves victimized by the systems under which we live, finding it nearly impossible to make a living doing what they know they were born to do unless they produce very non-confrontational and non-subversive works. In our society it is the wealthy people who benefit from our existing systems that get to decide what art becomes elevated to mainstream attention, so artists look at who’s making a “successful” living at their art and what they’re creating and they model their output on examples which challenge the powerful in no meaningful way.

But there is so, so very much to say about this weird electronic wasteland we find ourselves in if you don’t let the bastards hijack your creativity like that. It takes some learning, some understanding, some insight and some courage, but these are all qualities that every artist must have anyway. Anyone with the artist’s fire burning within them has the power to use their gift to sow the seeds of awakening in some very inconvenient places within our society.

And from those seeds, a healthy world can one day begin to grow. A healthy society where it really does make sense for artists to be talking about how great things are and what a fun time they’re having. Where songs about singing and poems about romance really do have their place — because they’re not being used to distract and divert from the horrors that are unfolding right in front of our faces in a situation that urgently needs everyone’s care and attention.

But until then, as long as we’re living under an empire that is fueled by human blood in a mind-controlled dystopia on a dying planet, it is our responsibility as artists to continually point to what’s happening and the urgent need to address it, in every way that we can.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/08 ... depravity/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 31, 2024 11:40 am

Suspending Israel From the UN
August 29, 2024

Members could employ the same mechanism used in 1974 to freeze apartheid South Africa out of the General Assembly, Anton Ferreira reports.

Image
Danny Danon, Israel’s U.N. ambassador, addressing reporters at the U.N. on Wednesday. (UN Photo/Evan Schneider)

By Anton Ferreira
PassBlue

Israel’s devastating onslaught on Gaza, now approaching the one-year mark, and increasing settler outrages in the West Bank are giving fresh urgency to moves to suspend the Jewish state from the United Nations General Assembly.

Palestinian civil society has long been calling for such a step, and the Gaza war, along with the two major pronouncements from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) about Israel this year, have given the initiative new traction.

The idea is to use the same mechanism against the Jewish state that was used in 1974 to freeze apartheid South Africa’s participation in the General Assembly. The action contributed to the white minority government’s isolation and its eventual collapse.

It was the new, democratic South African state that brought the genocide application against Israel in the ICJ, resulting in an interim judgment by the court in January broadly supporting South Africa’s case.


Then in July, the court — responding to a General Assembly request — delivered an advisory opinion finding that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories amounted to colonization, racial discrimination and apartheid.

The Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC) is leading the drive for Israel’s suspension, Maren Mantovani, the international outreach coordinator of the Stop the Wall campaign, told PassBlue. The organization is based in Ramallah, the Palestinian capital in the West Bank.

“There is an ongoing, concerted effort by Palestinian civil society to push the U.N. to uphold its mission . . . and to define and enact the precise modalities to end Israel’s crimes and violations,” Mantovani said.

Saleh Hijazi, a BNC adviser on apartheid-free policy, said he expected calls for Israel’s suspension to intensify next month with the opening of the 79th session of the General Assembly. UNGA, as it is known, begins on Sept. 10.

(The Palestinian delegation at the U.N. said on Aug. 22 that it was also planning to soon initiate an “actionable resolution” in the General Assembly, “demanding within a time frame the end of this illegal occupation and all other issues contained” in the ICJ advisory opinion.)

Image
Palestine’s Riyad Mansour at a U.N. meeting in January. (UN Photo/Mark Garten)

“I have been in a number of international forums over the past few months, including a joint meeting between the Organization of Islamic Co-operation and the U.N. Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, where sanctions, including diplomatic [measures] and suspending Israel from UNGA, were a big part of the discussion,” Hijazi said by email.

“Indeed, civil society organizations, movements and grassroots groups the world over support such a call and see it as necessary.”

Among those who have expressed support is Balakrishnan Rajagopal, the U.N. special rapporteur on the right to adequate housing.

Image
Rajagopal in October 2022. (U.N. Photo/Loey Felipe)

“I hope that the Global South . . . increases pressure for meaningful action to stop the genocide in Gaza, end the occupation of Palestine and ensure that perpetrators of grave crimes are brought to justice,” he said in an email. “One of those actions could very well be based on the precedent set by the action taken against apartheid South Africa.”

Craig Mokhiber, an international human rights lawyer who formerly worked for the U.N., wrote in a message to PassBlue that “it would be hard to imagine a country more deserving, as a minimum, of suspension from the UNGA.”

“The precedent of the suspension of apartheid South Africa is well established,” he noted. “The UNGA should move at once to suspend Israel, and to direct the Organization to use its resources and mechanisms to combat Israel’s apartheid and gross violations of human rights, just as it did in South Africa.”

He added that no country had more consistently violated the principles of the U.N. Charter than Israel.

Image
Gilad Erdan, Israel’s then U.N. ambassador, shredding a page of the U.N. Charter on May 10, as he addressed a General Assembly session on “Illegal Israeli actions in occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” (UN Photo/Manuel Elías)

“Israel is today on trial in the World Court for genocide, its leaders are the subject of arrest warrant requests in the ICC [International Criminal Court] for crimes against humanity, the ICJ has found it is perpetrating apartheid and that its decades-long occupation of the Palestinian territory is unlawful,” he said.

The council of the League of Arab States resolved at a meeting in Cairo in July to pursue the idea of suspending Israel, but so far no U.N. member state has taken any formal steps to do so.

The South African government, which has placed Palestinian solidarity front and center of its foreign policy, has yet to discuss the suspension issue, said Clayson Monyela, the spokesperson for the Department of International Relations and Cooperation.

Nevertheless, South African nongovernmental organizations are confident that Pretoria would be in the vanguard of the effort.

“We expect South Africa would fully support it at all levels,” Bram Hanekom, a board member of Africa4Palestine, said in a phone interview with PassBlue. “It’s a domestic issue for us, it speaks to morality, it speaks to justice, it speaks to our own history.”

Image
South Africa’s U.N. ambassador, Mathu Joyini, in May. (UN Photo/Rick Bajornas)

But South Africa is heavily dependent on its trade relations with the United States and needs to avoid alienating lawmakers in Washington even more than it has already — not only by bringing the genocide case, but also by failing to condemn Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine and by maintaining close ties with Iran and China.

So pushing for Israel’s suspension would come with “serious risks,” Hanekom said. “We’re doing this incredible balancing act as a country.”

The Mideast analyst Mouin Rabbani cites Washington’s global clout when he says the Palestinian campaign might have symbolic importance, but it is unlikely to result in its proclaimed goal of another victory like the one against South Africa in 1974.

“There are fundamental differences between the situation you had with South Africa in the 1970s and the situation with Palestine now,” Rabbani said in a phone call.

“The South African suspension came in the context of the Cold War, where you had very clear voting blocs and any anticolonial resolution had a virtually automatic majority,” he added. “The situation now is very different, where there aren’t really solid blocs the way you had in the 1970s, and an additional consequence of that is that individual governments are much more susceptible to U.S. and European lobbying.”

Moreover, Washington is far more invested in Israel than it was in South Africa 50 years ago and would be “much more energetic” in opposing moves to suspend the Jewish state, Rabbani said.

“Another factor is, you don’t have the kind of universal global revulsion against the very existence of the Israeli regime the way you had towards the white minority regime in South Africa — its very existence was seen as beyond the pale in most of the world. I don’t think we’ve yet reached that situation with Israel.

People tend to put a lot of blame and responsibility on [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, or this Israeli government, and the realization that the problem here is one of the regime, rather than of an individual leader, still has some ways to go.”


Mokhiber described Israel as holding “the world record for breaching U.N. resolutions.”

“[It] has been found responsible for gross and systematic violations of human rights and humanitarian law by successive U.N. commissions of inquiry and independent special procedures. Worse, it has killed more U.N. staff than any party in history (and by a wide margin), has detained and tortured U.N. staff, and has regularly attacked, slandered and obstructed the Organization and its duly-mandated operations.”

Neither the Israeli mission to the U.N. nor the Palestinian delegation responded to requests for comment.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/08/29/s ... om-the-un/

*****

“We told Israel, ‘Look, if you guys have to go, we’re behind you all the way’”

Alastair Crooke

August 30, 2024

America is trapped by its ‘ironclad’, unqualified military support for Israel – which offers Netanyahu ample room for manoeuvre.

“The successful thwarting of Hizbullah’s attack on Sunday, symbolized Israel’s intelligence and operational edge”: According to the IDF spokesman, the Hezbollah attack was thwarted for the most part – thanks to 100 Israel aircraft carrying out around the clock – pre-emptive strikes that destroyed “thousands of missile launchers”.

“The group [Hizbullah], did manage to fire hundreds of rockets at northern Israel, but the damage they caused was quite limited”, the Israeli spokespersons disdainfully suggested (amidst a complete blackout on publication, under full censorship, in Israel of any reporting on damage caused to strategic Israeli infrastructure or to military sites).

In effect, it was ‘theatre’ mounted by both sides: By limiting their 20 minute strike to within 5 kms of the border – and by Hizbullah staying within the ‘equations’ of war – both sides signalled plainly to each other they were not looking for all-out war.

The ‘winner narrative’ from Israel was to be expected in today’s psy-war atmosphere. Yet it comes at a cost: Amos Harel in Haaretz suggests that “there’s a tendency in Israel [as a result] to view the success in foiling Sunday’s attack as renewed evidence of the consolidation of regional deterrence and [of western] strategic supremacy. But such an assessment” he concedes, “appears to be far from accurate”.

Indeed it is (far from accurate). The Sunday theatre concluded with no change to the strategic situation in the north of Israel: Daily attrition continues from across the frontier of Lebanon, down to the new 40 km border defining the extent of Israel’s loss of territory to the Hizbullah no-go zone.

The strategic point is not that this narrative of a successful thwarting of Hizbullah’s capabilities is highly misleading. Rather, it sets up expectations of available military success from which wrong conclusions will be drawn. We have been here before. It didn’t go well …

Seymour Hersh, doyen of U.S. investigative journalism, this week re-posted a piece that he wrote in August 2006 about U.S. thinking in the context of an Israeli war on Hizbullah – and on its intended role as a pathfinder-project for a subsequent U.S. strike on Iran.

What Hersh wrote then represents a striking déjà vu of today’s situation. It remains to the point because U.S. neocon thinking rarely evolves, but remains constant.

“The big question for our [U.S.] Air Force”, Hersh noted in 2006, “was how to hit a series of hard targets in Iran successfully”, the former senior intelligence official said. “Who is the closest ally of the U.S. Air Force in its planning? It’s not Congo—it’s Israel”. The official continued:

“Everybody knows that Iranian engineers have been advising Hezbollah on tunnels and underground missile emplacements. And so the USAF went to the Israelis with some new tactics and said to them: ‘Let’s concentrate on the bombing and share what we have on Iran – and what you have on Lebanon.’”.

“The Israelis told us [that Hesballah] would be a cheap war with many benefits,” a U.S. government consultant with close ties to Israel said: “Why oppose it? We’ll be able to hunt down and bomb missiles, tunnels, and bunkers from the air. It would be a demo for Iran”.

“I was told by the consultant that the Israelis repeatedly pointed to the war in Kosovo as an example of what Israel would try to achieve. “The NATO forces … methodically bombed and strafed not only military targets but tunnels, bridges, and roads, in Kosovo and elsewhere in Serbia, for seventy-eight days …“Israel studied the Kosovo war as its role model … The Israelis told Condi Rice: You did it in about seventy days, but we need half of that—thirty-five days’ [to finish off Hizbullah]””.

“The Bush White House”, a Pentagon consultant said, “has been agitating for some time to find a reason for a preëmptive blow against Hizbullah”; adding, “It was our intent to have Hezbollah diminished, and now we have someone else doing it … According to a Middle East expert, with knowledge of the current thinking of both the Israeli and the U.S. governments: Israel had devised a plan for attacking Hezbollah—and shared it with Bush Administration officials—well before the July 12th [2006] kidnappings: “It’s not that the Israelis had a trap that Hezbollah walked into,” he said, “but there was a strong feeling in the White House that sooner or later the Israelis were going to do it”, Hersh wrote.

“The White House was more focussed on stripping Hezbollah of its missiles, because – if there were to be a military option against Iran’s nuclear facilities – it had to get rid of the weapons that Hezbollah could use in a potential retaliation at Israel. Bush wanted both”, Hersh was told”.

“The Bush Administration was closely involved in the planning of Israel’s retaliatory attacks. President Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were convinced … that a successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign against Hezbollah’s heavily fortified underground-missile and command-and-control complexes in Lebanon could ease Israel’s security concerns and also serve as a prelude to a potential American preëmptive attack to destroy Iran’s nuclear installations – some of which are also buried deep underground”. (Emphasis added.)

A former intelligence officer said, “We told Israel, ‘Look, if you guys have to go, we’re behind you all the way”.

“Nonetheless, some officers serving with the Joint Chiefs of Staff were deeply concerned that the Administration will have a far more positive assessment of the air campaign than they should – the former senior intelligence official said. “There is no way that Rumsfeld and Cheney will draw the right conclusion about this,” he said. “When the smoke clears, they’ll say it was a success, and they’ll draw reinforcement for their plan to attack Iran”.

(This is where we are today: When the smoke clears from Sunday’s ‘exemplary pre-emptive attack in Lebanon’, Netanyahu will be using it with Washington to draw reinforcement for his aspiration to engage the U.S. for a strike on Iran.)

“Strategic bombing has been a failed military concept for ninety years, and yet air forces all over the world keep on doing it,” John Arquilla, a defense analyst at the Naval Postgraduate School, told [Hersh] … Rumsfeld [too, shared this expert’s jaded view]: “Air power and the use of a few Special Forces had worked in Afghanistan, and he [Rumsfeld] had tried to do it again in Iraq. It was the same idea, but it didn’t work. He thought that Hezbollah was too dug in – and the Israeli attack plan would not work, and the last thing he wanted was another war on his shift that would put the American forces in Iraq in greater jeopardy”.

“The 2006 Israeli plan, according to the former senior intelligence official, was “the mirror image of what the United States had been planning for Iran””. (The initial U.S. Air Force proposals for an air attack to destroy Iran’s nuclear capacity, which included the option of intense bombing of civilian infrastructure targets inside Iran) were being resisted by the top leadership of the Army, the Navy, and the Marine Corps – according to current and former officials. They argued that the Air Force plan will not work and will inevitably lead, as in the Israeli war with Hezbollah, to the insertion of troops on the ground.

David Siegel, the then Israeli spokesman, said that his country’s leadership believed, as of early August 2006, that the air war had been successful, and had destroyed more than seventy per cent of Hizbullah’s medium-and long-range-missile launching capacity.

Israel however had not destroyed 70% of Hizbullah’s missile inventory in 2006. It was deceived by Hizbullah’s intelligence decoy operation. The Israelis bombed empty sites.

Today, we hear the same exultatory narrative coming from IDF Spokesman Rear Admiral Hagari – parading how successful Israel’s strikes on Sunday had been.

Likely some in Israel and U.S. again will be deeply concerned that the Biden team may fall for a far more positive assessment of the Israeli air campaign than they should.

Many commentators across the West are making the same mistake. As Haaretz’ military correspondent noted in respect to this Sunday’s air strikes: “there’s a tendency in Israel to view the success in foiling Sunday’s attack as renewed evidence for the consolidation of regional deterrence – and strategic supremacy”.

Or, in other words, Iran has been deterred from carrying out its ‘commitment’ to retaliate for Ismail Haniyah’s assassination in Tehran by the amassing of fire-power by the U.S. in the waters of the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf and the fear of overwhelming U.S. firepower.

Anyone seeing the video glimpses of Iran’s automated and deep ‘missile cities’ deployed throughout the depth of Iran (and which it has allowed to be exposed to momentary view), should understand that carpet bombing Iranian civilian structure will not prevent the Iranian ability to respond lethally. Iran could unleash Regional Armageddon, nothing less.

So, for clarity’s sake: Who exactly is it that is deterred and backing down? Is it Iran or Washington?

Yet, “If it’s true that the Israeli campaign is based on the American approach in Kosovo, then it missed the point”, General Wesley Clark, the U.S. commander told Hersh. Killing civilians was not the objective: “In my experience, air campaigns have to be backed, ultimately, by the will and capability to finish the job on the ground”.

And that – simply – for the U.S. to contemplate for Iran is impossible.

“We face a dilemma”, an Israeli official told Hersh in 2006. Effectively, to decide whether to go for a local response (which is ineffective), or go for a comprehensive response—to really take on Hezbollah [and Iran] once and for all”.

Plus ça change: The dilemma may not have changed, but Israel has altered radically. A majority in Israel today is messianic in its support for Jabotinsky’s followers to do what they had always wanted and promised to do: To expel the Palestinians from the Land of Israel.

It is understood by many in Washington that the Revisionist Zionists (who represent maybe about 2 million Israelis) intend cynically to impose their will on the ‘Anglo-Saxons’, by plunging the U.S. into a wide regional war, should the White House try to undercut their neo-Nakba project of Palestinian forcible expulsion.

Benjamin Netanyahu has provoked Iran once (with the assassination in the Damascus Consulate of a top IRGC general); twice with killing of Haniyeh in Tehran; and a possible third would be were Israel to launch a so-called ‘pre-emptive’ strike against Iran, believing that the U.S. would be trapped and politically unable to stand aloof as Iran retaliated against Israel.

However, should the U.S. veto a strike on Iran before the U.S. elections (and Iran not retaliate for the death of Haniyeh before then), the Naqba ‘project’ can be moved forward via extending the existing Gaza military offensive to the West Bank, or through a grave provocation on the Haram al-Sharif/The Temple Mount (such as a fire at the al-Aqsa Mosque).

The Revisionist Zionists have been clear over recent years that some crisis or the confusion of war would be required to implement their neo-Naqba project fully.

America particularly is trapped by its ‘ironclad’, unqualified military support for Israel – which offers Netanyahu ample room for manoeuvre.

Manoeuvre, that is, towards the conflict that is Netanyahu’s only escape hatch ‘upwards’ as the ‘walls of attrition’ close-in on Israel. Iran and Hizbullah seem to have chosen too, for now, to preserve their escalatory dominance through a return to imposed calibrated attrition on Israel.

The U.S. will not be able to keep such a huge deployment of naval vessels in the region for long; but equally, Netanyahu will not be able to politically prevaricate at home for long, either.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... l-the-way/

*****

Yemen: At the Threshold of the Strait… America Arrogance Ends
Posted by Internationalist 360° on August 29, 2024
Ansarollah

Image

Yemen is playing a pivotal role in reshaping the regional and international power balance. As tensions and conflicts escalate, Yemen has demonstrated its capacity to influence maritime policy and global trade, signaling a shift away from American dominance. The United States once considered a key player in the region, now faces new challenges requiring a reassessment of its strategies and the need to strengthen international partnerships amidst the current situation. Recent events highlight Yemen as a force capable of contributing to reconfiguring the regional and global order. This transformation suggests that the era of unparalleled American influence may be fading, elevating Yemen’s status as a sovereign state with the ability to impact the region’s future.

Military Developments and Impact on Global Trade

Recent developments in Yemen point to an escalation in military operations, including the use of drones and missiles, targeting commercial ships in the Red Sea. These attacks have a direct impact on global maritime trade routes, raising concerns among major powers about the security of navigation and the stability of international trade. The Yemeni military’s growing capabilities in targeting ships reflect a shift in the balance of power in the region.

As Yemeni forces continued their drone and missile attacks on a wide range of international ships violating a declared ban on Israeli vessels, the United States announced the formation of a military coalition called “Guardian of Prosperity” to halt Yemeni attacks. However, the bitter reality facing America is that its naval operations have failed to stop Yemeni forces in the Red Sea, as planned in their military strategies for the region. Despite forming a military naval coalition, the United States lacks a systematic plan to manage the crisis in the area. In reality, America, despite claiming to have entered the Red Sea as a controlling force, finds itself powerless against Yemeni strength.

American arrogance is accompanied by deliberate neglect of the fact that it is a principal party in the crisis and that it no longer holds authority or knowledge in the Red Sea. The sea now has a national guardian, known as the Yemeni Navy, which has emerged as a formidable force defending Yemen’s legitimate right to manage its maritime entrances within its territorial waters. This force is led by a leader entrusted by the nation’s people to stand alongside its crucial causes, not as a distant observer but as an active participant in the heart of the battle.

In response to the unconditional support provided by the Biden administration to Netanyahu during the Gaza war, which has exacerbated the crisis in the region, Yemen’s position, supported by its allies in the resistance axis, has turned the tables on America. Yemen has announced the continuation of its military operations against Israeli, American, and British ships and any vessel attempting to violate the ban on ships heading to ports in the occupied territories of the Red Sea until the war in Gaza ceases.

The Pentagon’s Struggles

The U.S. military has acknowledged its failure to extinguish fires on the Greek-flagged oil tanker “Sounion” in the Red Sea, which was attacked by Yemeni forces. Pentagon spokesman Patrick Ryder confirmed that the Sounion, carrying about a million barrels of crude oil, remains ablaze, adding that a third party attempted to send tugboats for assistance, but Yemeni forces prevented them from approaching, threatening to attack them. “The reality is that we are suffering from Yemeni attacks, and U.S. Central Command continues to assess the situation,” Ryder stated.

This is a difficult position for the United States, which has toppled countries while protecting others, and established governments while depriving others with mere declarations without needing to engage in military battles. In the end, amidst the battle with Yemen, the Pentagon, the most feared institution, has admitted that its forces failed to protect ships and had to flee the battlefield, acknowledging that its forces are “suffering,” which is a clear indication of America’s decline.

In a tragic recount of the American adventure in the Red Sea, the U.S. vowed at the start of the Al-Aqsa Flood battle to protect ships, deploying warships and aircraft carriers to confront Yemeni missiles and drones, and even launching extensive air raids on Yemen, all of which failed. Suddenly, America is shocked by a shift in Yemeni naval tactics from targeting ships with missiles to boarding, rigging them with explosives, and detonating them at will, without Western warships being able to protect them.

From Arrogance to Humiliation

Over the course of 10 months of naval confrontation, the Yemeni army targeted more than 180 ships, most of which were American, British, and Israeli, thereby imposing a reality that turned American arrogance at the start of its aggression on Yemen into a mockery by the Western media, forcing America to bow and admit its failure against Yemen’s weapons.

America has recognized the strength, effectiveness, and advancement of Yemeni weapons. The true picture has emerged, showing that Yemen is no longer just a voice in the Red Sea but is preparing for severe retaliation against any American violations and what it calls the “Guardian of Prosperity” coalition. Soon, Israel will be humiliated for its overreach in Yemeni airspace and its strikes on the port of Hodeidah.

The latest military operation targeting the Greek ship Sounion marked a strategic shift in the naval battle after Yemeni forces targeted the ship multiple times with missiles, drones, and warboats before boarding and rigging it with explosives. Furthermore, they engaged in a firefight with a European frigate attempting to rescue the ship, forcing it to retreat and flee.

The “New York Post” described the footage of the Sounion burning in the Red Sea as a “mockery of Washington and its allies, and a sign of American failure and the collapse of American deterrence.” The newspaper also reported it being a “mockery of the United States and its allies, who were supposed to protect vital shipping lines in the region.”

Congress Frustrated, Global Implications

“The National Review” stated that the U.S. failure in the Red Sea represents a total failure of American policy and strategy at the highest levels. Meanwhile, “Politico” reported that Yemeni forces have depleted Washington’s military stockpile, noting that the Red Sea battle is the most extensive and sustained military operation that has drained the Pentagon’s preferred ammunition for what it calls a potential confrontation with China.

The report added that “members of Congress are frustrated with the continued Red Sea mission, which requires the depletion of advanced American assets.” Politico quoted Mike Waltz, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Readiness, saying, “We are burning tens of billions of dollars, and our fleet is exhausted.”

As the U.S. strives to rebuild its strategy to confront the Yemeni navy, in line with the significant changes imposed by the latter on the region, the “Associated Press” confirmed that the U.S. Navy is facing challenges in building low-cost warships capable of shooting down Yemeni sea missiles in the Red Sea. The report noted that U.S. warship production is at its worst in 25 years, with the Navy struggling to produce low-cost warships for deployment in the Red Sea.

Yemeni Defense Minister’s Warning

Yemeni Defense Minister Major General Mohammad al-Atifi declared that Yemeni armed forces, with their various branches and formations, are at the highest levels of combat readiness, awaiting orders to launch painful strikes deep into the usurping Zionist entity and at critical and unexpected locations. “We confirm that we have received strict orders to determine appropriate and effective methods to deal with the challenges imposed by the Zionist enemy on the region and Yemen.”

He reiterated that “the Zionist entity will face only force, harshness, and resilience from us, and it will pay a heavy price for its persistent violations of our nation’s sovereignty and targeting of civilian facilities in Hodeidah, making it realize that it has embarked on an ill-considered adventure, and it is now time for it to bear the heavy burdens of this confrontation.”

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/08/ ... ance-ends/

******

Deadly drone strike hits Jenin as battles rage across northern West Bank

The Israeli army has killed 20 Palestinians since it launched its wide-scale assault on the occupied West Bank earlier this week

News Desk

AUG 30, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

Three Palestinian resistance fighters were assassinated in an Israeli airstrike near the West Bank city of Jenin on 30 August, coinciding with a massive Israeli army operation across the occupied territory and fierce clashes within its refugee camps and streets.

“Three Palestinian men were killed early this morning in an Israeli airstrike targeting the town of Zababdeh, located south of Jenin,” WAFA news agency reported.

The dead have been identified as Maysara Suleiman Masharqa, Arafat Jaser al-Amer, and Wissam Ayman al-Khazem. Khazem was the commander of Hamas’ armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, in Jenin, while Amer belonged to the Jenin Brigade of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement’s Quds Brigades.

According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, their bodies have been seized by Israeli forces.

The strike targeted the town of Zababdeh, south of Jenin. “An Israeli drone launched missiles at the three men after they exited their vehicle, which had earlier been struck by heavy gunfire from Israeli soldiers and subsequently caught fire,” WAFA said.

The Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) said Israeli troops blocked ambulances from reaching the scene of the strike.

The Israeli army said in a statement that undercover officers opened fire at a vehicle, killing Khazem – before a drone struck and killed the other two resistance fighters who had fled.

“Earlier in the morning, Israeli special forces had surrounded a house in Zababdeh and opened fire on it,” WAFA added.

Israel’s operation across the West Bank has killed 20 Palestinians since it began early on 28 August, 11 in Jenin, five in Tulkarem, and four in Tubas, according to WAFA.

The strike came as fierce clashes had been raging between Israeli forces and resistance fighters in Jenin throughout Friday morning.

“Our fighters were able to detonate a pre-prepared explosive device in a D9 military bulldozer in the Al-Damj axis, achieving confirmed injuries among the bulldozer crew,” Jenin Brigade said in a statement early on Friday.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades’ Jenin branch said early on 30 August that its fighters “engaged in fierce clashes with the Zionist enemy forces that penetrated the Al-Damj axis, targeting them with machine guns and explosive devices.”

Clashes raged across other West Bank cities, including Tulkarem and Nablus.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades branch in Nablus said it targeted Israeli forces storming the city’s Balata camp with machine guns and explosive devices.

Several people were killed by Israeli troops in the West Bank on 29 August, including Mohammad Jaber – known as Abu Shujaa – the popular commander of the Quds Brigades’ Tulkarem Brigade, who was assassinated in Tulkarem alongside several other fighters after an hours-long gun battle with Israeli troops.

The Israeli army launched its biggest operation in the occupied West Bank in over two decades early on 28 August, raiding Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas with hundreds of troops and launching airstrikes on the three cities, considered major hotbeds of resistance in the territory.

The operation has focused mainly on Jenin and Tulkarem, but fighting is taking place in a number of other cities and areas of the northern West Bank.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) highlighted on 29 August that the West Bank operation “poses strategic risks for Israel” given its army is already “stretched thin” due to the war in Gaza.

Israel launched the operation in the West Bank following a blast in Tel Aviv last week, which was claimed by Hamas and the PIJ.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz has called for forced evacuations of civilians in the territory.

“We need to deal with the threat exactly as we deal with terror infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary evacuation of Palestinian civilians and any other step needed,” Katz said.

https://thecradle.co/articles/deadly-dr ... -west-bank

Polio vaccination campaign in Gaza ‘not perfect, best we’ve got’: WHO

A Hamas official said on Wednesday that the plan could potentially ‘deprive hundreds of children’ from receiving the much-needed vaccine

News Desk

AUG 30, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Eyad Baba/AFP/Getty Images)

The World Health Organization (WHO) revealed details to Al Jazeera on 30 July on the upcoming vaccination campaign in Gaza, which is set to begin over the weekend.

WHO spokesperson Dr Margaret Harris said the UN agency welcomes Israel’s acceptance of daily “pauses” in fighting in certain areas of the strip, despite it not being the comprehensive ceasefire, which the organization believes is necessary.

“It’s not perfect … but it’s the best workable solution we have at the moment. We’re accepting that this is what has been made possible because it’s such an emergency to get these children vaccinated,” Harris said.

The pauses will be implemented in designated areas of the southern, central, and northern Gaza Strip, Harris went on to say, adding that the Israeli army must “guarantee the safety” of the children who show up for vaccination.

“We have to hope that [the Israeli military’s] agreement will be held to.” She also said that the three days allocated for this process may not be enough and that an agreement has been reached with Tel Aviv to potentially extend the period by a minimum of one day.

A senior WHO official told Reuters on 29 August that Hamas and Israel have agreed to three separate three-day pauses to implement polio vaccinations across the strip. Israel has already begun its own campaign to vaccinate its soldiers, with the virus posing a greater threat to Palestinians with each day.

Just days ago, WHO announced a 10-month-old baby was paralyzed from the poliovirus, the first such case in the besieged enclave in over two decades.

Rik Peeperkorn, the senior WHO official for Palestine, said the campaign will begin on Sunday. Three pauses will take place that day between 6:00 AM and 3:00 PM. “The campaign would start in central Gaza with three consecutive daily pauses in fighting, then move to southern Gaza, where there would be another three-day pause, followed by northern Gaza,” he said, confirming that there is an agreement for a potential one-day extension.

“A second round of vaccination would be required four weeks after the first round,” he added.

Earlier this week, WHO emergencies director Mike Ryan told the UN Security Council that 90 percent of coverage is needed to stop the outbreak and prevent an international spread.

Hamas official Bassem Naim is cited by Reuters as saying that the movement is “ready to cooperate with international organizations to secure this campaign, serving and protecting more than 650,000 Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip."

Israel’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) said on Wednesday that the campaign will be coordinated with the Israeli army “as part of the routine humanitarian pauses that will allow the population to reach the medical centers where the vaccinations will be administered.”

Senior Hamas official Izzat al-Rishq slammed the initiative in a statement that day.

“The criminal Netanyahu's talk about designating specific areas within the Gaza Strip to allow for polio vaccinations is not an agreement to a humanitarian truce requested by the UN and international organizations. Instead, it is a new manipulation and blatant deceit aimed at continuing the genocide and systematic killing of our people, and furthering the slow death of Gaza's children,” Rishq said on 28 August.

“This suspicious method that Netanyahu and his government are trying to impose would thwart the UN initiative and deprive hundreds of children of the polio vaccine,” he added. “What is required from the United Nations and the international community is to exert all possible pressure on Netanyahu to accept a comprehensive humanitarian truce in the Gaza Strip, so that the vaccination can be carried out for all the children in the Strip, according to the UN's call, rather than selecting specific areas chosen by the fascist occupation government at its discretion.”

“We renew our support for the United Nations and international organizations' initiative for the immediate and urgent start of a comprehensive humanitarian truce across the entire Gaza Strip, to allow for the polio vaccination campaign for all our children.”

It remains unclear how the upcoming vaccination campaign will be affected by the mass internal displacement, ravaged infrastructure, and the fact that fighting and bombardment will continue in Gaza throughout the process.

Israel’s military launched a campaign to vaccinate its own troops last month.

According to a Foreign Policy report released on 30 August, Israeli society is highly vulnerable to the spread of polio, particularly the unvaccinated ultra-Orthodox community. The report notes that the conditions created by the Israeli army in Gaza, which has resulted in the spread of illnesses such as polio, will backfire on Tel Aviv.

Hebrew news outlet Channel 13 had reported on Wednesday, citing sources, that Israel agreed to a temporary humanitarian truce to allow polio vaccinations. The truce is not part of prisoner exchange negotiations with Hamas, the report said, adding that the decision was made by Benjamin Netanyahu and the security establishment without informing the Prime Minister’s Office.

Netanyahu’s office only responded to the channel by saying this is not a truce, but merely the “allocation” of certain areas in the strip for vaccination and that there will be no comprehensive truce.

Meanwhile, the prime minister continues to obstruct ceasefire and captive-exchange talks.

https://thecradle.co/articles/polio-vac ... ve-got-who

Sexual harassment of Palestinian women by Israeli troops spikes at Hebron checkpoint

One soldier dropped his pants and said 'come and see' to a Palestinian woman as she tried to pass the checkpoint

News Desk

AUG 30, 2024

Image
Palestinian women passing the Israeli checkpoint at Qalandiyah (Photo: Eyad Jadallah/APA Images)

Israeli soldiers have increasingly been sexually harassing Palestinian women at checkpoints in the city of Hebron in the occupied West Bank, Haaretz reported on 30 August.

The Israeli newspaper collected multiple testimonies from women living in the city detailing the harassment.

In an incident on 17 August, an Israeli soldier exposed himself to a young Palestinian woman at the Tamar checkpoint in Hebron.

The woman said that after the soldier demanded she open her bag to be searched, he took down his pants and asked her: "Do you want it? Come and see."

"Out of shock, I left the checkpoint and didn't know what was happening. I felt as if someone had given me a slap," she told Haaretz.

The young woman reported the incident to the local community leader, Basam Abu Aisha, who then contacted a senior Israeli civil administration official. The official accompanied the woman to the checkpoint, where she identified the soldier.

Abu Aisha was later surrounded by eight soldiers and threatened by a civil administration officer, Shadi Shubash, who told him that the young woman's testimony was a "lie" and warned him not to "get involved."

"I was exhausted and depressed by it. Now it's easier for me, but when I want to go through the checkpoint, I'm afraid the same thing will happen again," the woman told Haaretz.

Following the incident, other women reported similar humiliating treatment at checkpoints in the city, testifying that the sexual harassment by Israeli soldiers had become even worse in recent weeks.

One young woman reported that an Israeli soldier took photos of her and her sister when they were crossing the same checkpoint.

He made a video call to his friend. "He started talking to us and saying we were beautiful, then taking pictures of us and saying: 'Look at these, look how beautiful they are,'" the woman said.

Another woman reported that an Israeli soldier searched her phone while holding her hand.

"He grabbed my hand and told me to open the phone. I told him these were my private photos; why should I open them?" she said.

The girl, who wears a hijab, said she had photos on her phone where her hair is visible. "He saw everything. He went through picture after picture. He held my hand for fifteen minutes and looked at my cell phone," she said.

In another case, a soldier told her: "I'll wait for you next time, beautiful."

Others reported experiencing regular verbal abuse as they passed checkpoints, saying they are now scared to cross them on their own.

Hebron residents also reported that after metal detectors were installed following 7 October, women are sometimes required to remove items of their clothing. In some cases, women reported being instructed to remove their hijabs.

In the past, women used to film soldiers at checkpoints to document their behavior. But at the beginning of the war, one of the residents of the neighborhood was arrested for about a week after documenting a soldier's behavior, and since then, the residents testified that they are too afraid to do so.

Another woman from Hebron explained that when she would enter the checkpoint, the soldiers called her names and used sexual language to humiliate her. They would say things such as "your mom's pussy," "slut," and "on my cock," including on the loudspeaker of the checkpoint. Soldiers would also make sexual gestures with their hands.

"It's not just one soldier," she added. "Sometimes someone says, 'Give me your number.' Girls started to be afraid to go to the checkpoint alone."

"When I go to work, I check if there is anyone else at the checkpoint," said another Palestinian woman from the neighborhood. “If there is, I pass, and if not, then I don't.”"

Another young woman said that when she was on her way to school, the metal detector at the checkpoint went off. The soldiers asked her to take off her jacket and go through again. But the detector continued to buzz. The soldier then asked her to take off her hijab, and she refused. After the intervention of social activists in the neighborhood, they finally let her pass.

https://thecradle.co/articles/sexual-ha ... checkpoint
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Sep 01, 2024 12:22 pm

Zionism is Worse Than Nazism
August 30, 2024

Image
Photo composition showing old photos of the Nakba and a young girl playing in front of the map of Palestine. Photo: Al Mayadeen.

By Susana Kahlil – Aug 19, 2024

Since childhood.

The fact that they imposed in 1948 that colonial regime called Israel in Palestine made them worse than the Nazis.

Since I was a child, I felt and saw Zionism as worse than the Nazi horror. I saw the movies on TV and pictures in my elementary and high school library books of the European Holocaust against their own European Jewish brethren.

I saw the pain, the suffering, the Nazi cruelty against Europeans of Jewish religion, but at the same time I was disturbed, shocked and hurt. Why are the Jews now doing the same to us Palestinians?

I was in another dimension of sadness and pain. That wound was also suffered by other Arab children. It is not in vain that today this colonial regime is eager to murder children…Kill the children, Zionist colonizers…

Intellectuals and non-intellectuals, before I could read, before my alphabet, I already knew that the Zionists were and are worse than the Nazis. And I felt this because of the very fact that this colonialism called Israel was created. That confined and catapulted them to all evil and inhumanity.

Scholars, I was born listening to the testimonies and groans of my parents who survived Al Nakba. My whole family was a victim of Al Nakba and later part of my family was a victim of Al Naksa. Today I have relatives in Gaza. I was born listening to the stories of Arab men and women in Lebanon and Syria traumatized and frightened by the Zionist horror.

Experts, my Palestinian peasant mother fled the horror and fear, today she is covered by the dust of distant lands of Palestine, in my beloved Venezuela. She was trapped in nerves, I detested her nerves of which I inherited something and I do not thank you, my most beloved, Fauziah Khalil.

From the universe of my childhood I used to say to myself: the confessors of the Jewish religion should be the noblest people since they had suffered so much. That people of the Jewish religion should be the most generous because they had suffered so much. From my childhood I imagined that the Jews must be the most good, the most kind and the most just people because they had suffered so much. From childhood.

Zionism hijacked everything possibly noble.

I used to say to my father: Yavah they are worse than Hitler, actually, we all said that since the pain and injury; however, we could not say it to the rest of the people as it was not only incomprehensible, but it was seen as something negative. That was also another difficulty, another regret. I would tell some children at school that the Jews (Zionists) were killing the Palestinians and the children would say to me: you are bad, you Arabs hate the Jews, I would reply that this was not true and I did not know what else to say, which made me sad and sometimes I would start crying, it was a refuge for that solitary cry of childhood. How politicized a child’s soul can be, it is the soul of love, and as many have already explained that politics is the purest expression of love. Kill children in Gaza Zionist colonizers.

Once, my mother was praying (at that time almost nobody prayed) and I heard her say: Beni Israel, I could not understand and I was upset and asked her why do you say Israel, she did not answer me, she continued praying and I insisted and my father saw that scene and yelled at me very upset, I knew he was going to hit me, I could run, but that was worse because it was a serious disobedience. He hit me and in the middle of the beating I told him that she said Israel. He told me, never interrupt the prayer. My mom when she finished her prayer jumped up like a demon and jumped up to hit me too, for interrupting her prayer. They both hit me, they didn’t listen to me and didn’t explain about Israel.

I went to cry at Uncle Samir’s furniture store, a Lebanese man, and I got under a bed that was for sale (I used to get under the beds). I started to cry, but more than because of the beating, I cried because I didn’t understand my parents and at the same time, I condemned them in my moral tribunal: why my mom says Israel, they are killing us. Under the bed, where sometimes there was a cat, in that childish shelter and in my crying I was omnipresent that the Zionists were worse than Hitler.

Uncle Samir saw me and said: come on, get out of there and he asked me: why was I crying and I told him that my dad and mom were bad, I shouldn’t have told him that, because he got upset, he said: saying that is haram (sin). I said to myself: Uncle Samir is going to beat me too. Immediately I told him that my mother was praying and he said Israel (I was accusing my parents of being traitors), he started to laugh, I said: I was saved, he is not going to hit me; but I was more confused, and I told him that Israel is killing us, he answered me: God is going to punish them.

In San Felix, my beloved hometown (San Felix is a colonial name, it should be called Chirica), in Bolivar State, Venezuela. That factory town, the dormitory of the working class of the Basic Companies of Guayana City. In their very humble neighborhoods, with parties where some drugs and alcohol ran, in large lines were not the cultural urban recreation. My mother did not allow us to go to those places. In contrast, there were effervescent evangelical cults in the streets. They were good people, with good values, from their humility, well dressed, decent, disciplined. Many people who were in drug hell were saved by embracing the gospel. Many women came out of prostitution through the gospel. Our parents were very careful that their children did not fall into drugs, I do not remember any son or daughter of evangelicals using drugs. I would go to those cults and sometimes they would worship Israel and that affected me and I wanted to talk to them and tell them that Israel was killing the Palestinians, that they took our land.

I once told my school teacher that the Jews (Zionists) were worse than Hitler. She was scandalized and alarmed and went and told my dad: Mohamed, Susana told me that the Jews are worse than Hitler, my father replied, yes the Zionists are worse than the Nazis. My father explained to her that he had to flee Palestine and she, without letting him finish, replied that that is Israel, that that was written in the Bible. My father told her, shouting angrily, that those Europeans have nothing to do with the Israel of the Bible, they are all the damned criminals of the British and the United States. The discussion was long and I was focused, listening to everything.



Since my childhood I told myself the Jews (at that time they did not say Zionists), are worse than Hitler, I repeat, for the very fact of having created, fabricated that “State” of Israel.

Today, faced with the slaughter of Palestinian children, I turn to my childhood and I gather from that childish purity, that the Zionists are worse than the Nazis. That colonialism should never have been created. I seek refuge in my childhood, fleeing from so much intellectual alienation of elegant cowardice, which strengthens Zionism.

The very fact of creating that colonial entity in Palestine, already became and turns Zionism into something worse than Nazism.

Zionism is a European mutation of Nazism, but worse, see it in the normalization of the fear that inhabits them. That colonial regime should never have been created and today, although there are pro-Palestinians, there are almost no people who dare to say an end to the existence of that colonial regime. That is where the justice and liberation of our historical time is.

https://orinocotribune.com/zionism-is-w ... an-nazism/

Palestinian Resistance: From the Lone Sniper to an Army of Snipers
August 30, 2024

Image
Al-Qassam snipers shoot their Al-Ghoul sniper rifles at a shooting range, as part of a promotional video for the Palestinian resistance-made rifles. Photo: Al-Qassam Brigades/Military Media.

By Yousef Fares – Aug 30, 2024

When sniper rifles first appeared in the military parades of resistance factions in the Gaza Strip in the years preceding Al-Aqsa Flood, the enemy did not suspect that these weapons, nearly two meters long, would make such a significant difference in the field during a war of this scale. However, yesterday, the Israel Hayom newspaper acknowledged on its front page that snipers from Hamas and Islamic Jihad movements now pose the greatest threat to Israeli forces operating inside the Strip.

Since the beginning of the Second Intifada, sniper weapons were limited to individual fighters who proved their prowess in sniping. It is likely that Islamic Jihad’s Al-Quds Brigades and Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades had only a small handful of soldiers with this unique talent and who were capable of executing sniping operations with available Russian weapons, such as the Dragunov rifle that entered into service in 1967, or US-made NATO rifles. It is worth noting that neither these rifles nor their ammunition were abundantly available. One resistance fighter recalls that a single sniper rifle would be circulated among several factions in a single month, and the price of a single bullet sometimes reached $70. This logistical scarcity significantly limited the development of the resistance’s human expertise in sniping operations. Thus, until 2008, sniping operations were entrusted to those uniquely talented fighters who excelled in using a sniper rifle. These rifles had an effective range of less than one kilometer, and a bullet caliber of 7.62 mm.

The turning point that transformed individual sniping missions into a broad combat specialization, for which military academies were established and fighters underwent lengthy military tests to select those suitable for the work, was the arrival of the Austrian Steyr HS .50 rifle piece that entered service in 2004. The United States imposed a sales ban on it in the international arms market to prevent a copy from reaching the Islamic Republic of Iran. However, according to a resistance source, Iran obtained a piece of it one year after its release, reverse-engineered it, developed it, then began mass producing it under the name Shaher. Soon afterwards, it reached Gaza in the summer of 2008. While the Austrian weapon fired 12.7 mm bullets with a lethal range of up to 1500 meters, the Iranian Shaher was developed to fire 14.5 mm bullets with a lethal range of up to 4000 meters. The locally produced Qassam version, named Al-Ghoul, fires 14.5 mm caliber bullets with an effective and lethal range of up to 2000 meters.



The important thing about all of this is that sniper weapons are no longer rare, nor is their ammunition scarce. Rather, they have become available to all resistance factions, and it has become possible to develop a large cadre of specialized fighters who excels in using the best sniper weapons in the world. The Al-Ghoul rifle is especially suitable for the Strip’s environment and these rifles, which the Palestinians have made with their own hands, are used with high proficiency. This human abundance in snipers and material abundance of weapons appeared during Al-Aqsa Flood like never before. The resistance has carried out at least one sniping operation every week, for the past 44 weeks of war. In fact, the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Flood Operation was carried out with snipers who used precise shots to disable all the surveillance cameras and electronic machine guns along the separation fence within minutes.

Perhaps what most worries the Zionist enemy army about the sniper threat is that the occupation cannot hope to deplete the resistance in a war of attrition. The ammunition is locally manufactured and the snipers who graduated from military academies and trained extensively over the past ten years are always ready. A sniping operation needs nothing more than a skilled shooter, a rifle, and a bullet. As for the range, Al-Ghoul can inflict wounds at a distance of 4km which is the depth of the Netzarim axis, from the Zeitoun neighborhood to the newly established barrier. This means that the occupation soldiers, whom the Zionist political leadership has decided to keep in Gaza, will be sitting ducks on a shooting range with inexhaustible ammunition and tireless snipers.

https://orinocotribune.com/palestinian- ... f-snipers/

******

Israeli army imposes siege on Hebron after double car bombing attack

Palestinian resistance fighters attacked illegal Jewish settlements near Hebron with two car bombs on Friday, injuring one high-ranking Israeli army officer

News Desk

AUG 31, 2024

Image
IDF troops examine the wreckage of a car bomb in the West Bank settlement of Karmei Tzur, early August 31, 2024. (Photo credit: Israel Defense Forces)

The Israeli army has imposed a siege on the city of Hebron in the occupied West Bank after Palestinian resistance fighters carried out car bomb attacks against illegal Jewish settlements in the area late on 30 August.

In response to the attack, the army temporarily closed the Ibrahimi Mosque and restricted worshipers from entering, invaded homes, and arrested many people indiscriminately. A video appeared on social media showing the Israeli army executing an unarmed Palestinian in the area.


Israeli media reported that two Palestinians were killed on Friday night while carrying out two separate operations on the settlements in the Gush Etzion area.

In the first incident, a car exploded at a gas station near the Gush Etzion junction. Israeli soldiers dispatched to the scene killed a Palestinian fighter who had arrived in the vehicle, and who attempted to attack them, the military said.

In the second incident, a Palestinian resistance fighter rammed a car through the entrance to the nearby settlement of Karmei Tzur. Israeli troops opened fire at the attacker. A member of the settlement's local security team used his own car to crash into him and kill him.

A short while later, the attacker's car exploded due to a bomb planted in it.

The commander of the Israeli army's Etzion Regional Brigade, Col. Gal Rich, was wounded by gunfire in the attack at the gas station, a military source said.

The General Authority of Civil Affairs informed the Palestinian Ministry of Health of the deaths of Muhammad Ihsan Yaqin Marqa and Zahdi Nidal Abu Afifa – the men who carried out the double operation – in the north of the city of Hebron.

Following the incidents, the Israeli army blew up part of Muhammad Marqa's family home in the Abu Rumman area of Hebron.


“Security forces continue to search the village of Karmi Tzur to rule out the suspicion of the presence of additional terrorists there,” the army spokesperson added.

Hamas and other Palestinian resistance factions issued statements on 31 August in support of the double operation. “The heroic double operation that took place tonight near the Gush Etzion and the Karmei Tzur settlements, north of Al-Khalil [Hebron], sends a clear message that the resistance will remain strong, persistent and ongoing as long as the brutal occupation and its aggression against our people and our land continue," a statement issued by Hamas said.

The statement added, "This qualitative operation carries symbolic significance due to its location in Khalil al-Rahman in the southern West Bank, and its timing, as it comes at a critical moment when we are witnessing the escalation of the occupation's aggression against the northern West Bank governorates, and its massacres and genocide in the Gaza Strip."

The Israeli army launched its biggest operation in the occupied West Bank in over two decades early on 28 August, raiding Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas with hundreds of troops and launching airstrikes on the three cities, considered major hotbeds of resistance in the territory.

The operation has focused mainly on Jenin and Tulkarem, but fighting is taking place in a number of other cities and areas of the northern West Bank.

Three Palestinian resistance fighters were assassinated in an Israeli airstrike near Jenin on 30 August, coinciding with a massive Israeli army operation across the occupied territory and fierce clashes within its refugee camps and streets.

In its statement Saturday, Hamas linked events in Gaza to events in the West Bank and called for Palestinians to be united in both parts of Palestine.

"This operation reaffirms to the occupation that it cannot isolate any part of the homeland, and that the heroic reservoir of our people and resistance in the West Bank will surprise the occupation at all times and places."

Israel's war on Hamas and the people of Gaza is now reaching its eleventh month. Israeli troops and bombs have killed over 40,000 Palestinians in Gaza, the majority women and children.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... ing-attack

Fourth day of clashes rage in Jenin as Israeli army evacuates casualties

Hebrew media reports that Palestinian resistance fighters used RPG shells against invading Israeli troops for the first time

News Desk

AUG 31, 2024

Image
An Israeli army armored jeep blocks a road leading to a hospital in Jenin in the West Bank on August 30, 2024, where ambulances are checked before reaching the medical facility. (Photo credit: Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP)

Israeli forces are continuing their assault on the northern West Bank city of Jenin and its refugee camp for the fourth consecutive day, WAFA news agency reported on 31 August.

Local sources reported that additional military reinforcements were deployed to the Jenin refugee camp Saturday, where Israeli troops raided homes, detained Palestinian men, and demolished structures in several quarters of the camp.

Al-Mayadeen's correspondent in the West Bank stated that Israeli troops have completely besieged Jenin camp and large parts of the city.

The Israeli military is carrying out mass arrests and abductions of Palestinians in the neighborhoods of Jenin, during its invasion of the occupied West Bank. pic.twitter.com/IvxgLlWmi3

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) August 31, 2024
Israel's Channel 14 cited reports of a serious security incident in Jenin camp involving the use of RPG missiles for the first time by Palestinian resistance fighters against the invading Israeli soldiers.

Local sources reported that Palestinian resistance fighters ambushed Israeli soldiers in the Al-Damj neighborhood. Helicopters have been seen transporting the wounded from the ongoing battle.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades – Jenin issued a statement saying, "Our valiant fighters on the battlefield continue to engage in fierce clashes with the Zionist enemy forces that have infiltrated all combat zones in the city of Jenin and its camp, using machine guns and explosive devices."

BREAKING | Reports of the death of an Israeli soldier and several others injured in clashes and ambushes during the military's widescale invasion of Jenin in the occupied West Bank. pic.twitter.com/dy82armnVt

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) August 31, 2024
The Qassam Brigades, Hamas' armed wing, issued a statement on the fighting in Al-Damj, saying the Israeli army's "aggression on Jenin will have severe consequences. We reassure our people that the resistance, in all its formations in the West Bank, is in the best stages of coordination and integration."

The statement added that the Qassam Brigades and other resistance factions have "prepared themselves for prolonged days of confrontation and clashing."

WAFA added that Israeli soldiers have used military bulldozers to destroy streets and damage electricity and water infrastructure in both the city and the refugee camp.

Widespread water outages have affected large areas of Jenin and the camp due to the destruction of main water lines. Several neighborhoods in the Jenin refugee camp are facing power cuts after Israeli troops fired on main electricity generators.

Palestinian Red Crescent reported that Israeli forces opened fire on one of its ambulances despite prior coordination for the vehicle to enter Jenin camp.

The Israeli military prevents ambulance crews from reaching injured and dead Palestinians, during the army's aggression on the al-Damj neighborhood of the Jenin camp. pic.twitter.com/G1TK0fjaKK

— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) August 31, 2024
In an interview with Sputnik, Jenin Governor Kamal Abu al-Rab said, "The brutal Israeli invasion of Jenin camp and city is still ongoing, as Israeli forces are besieging hospitals and systematically destroying infrastructure, including electricity and water."

He added that Israel seeks to destroy the West Bank as it is now destroying Gaza. Rab stressed that “what is happening is part of the Israeli settlement plan to annex the West Bank," change its demographics, and expel Palestinians from its refugee camps.

Israel's ongoing major operation in the northern West Bank is now largely focusing on the Jenin area after raids in Tulkarem and Fara concluded earlier this week.

The army claims its troops have killed at least 26 resistance fighters and detained 30 others since the beginning of the West Bank operation.

At least 600 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces and settlers in the occupied West Bank between the start of the war in Gaza on 7 October.

https://thecradle.co/articles/fourth-da ... casualties

New allegations against MbS go unchallenged by the west

Explosive new allegations about the Saudi crown prince have been met with the usual silence from western governments, who will turn a blind eye for the sake of normalization with Tel Aviv.

Giorgio Cafiero

AUG 31, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

Earlier this month, a flurry of headlines in the US and British media spotlighted astounding new allegations against Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS).

A former top Saudi intelligence official, Saad al-Jabri, accused MbS of forging his father King Salman’s signature to deploy ground troops to Yemen in 2015, and accused him of conspiring to murder former King Abdullah to make way for his father’s reign. These explosive claims were featured in the BBC documentary The Kingdom: The World’s Most Powerful Prince, prompting a renewed wave of scrutiny regarding MbS’s controversial actions during his rise to power.

Major British tabloids and newspapers like The Sun and The Times quickly picked up the story, running headlines like “Saudi Prince Mohammed Bin Salman’ FORGED his father’s signature to launch Yemen invasion.”

Renewed scrutiny of MbS met with western inaction

These pieces reignited debates around MbS’s governance, his involvement in the Yemen war, the blockade of Qatar, the infamous Ritz-Carlton “shakedown” of Saudi billionaires and officials, and the 2017 saga in which Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri was forced to resign on Saudi TV.

While the Jamal Khashoggi murder at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul nearly six years ago still lingers in the public memory, these fresh allegations have brought back into focus the contentious early years of the crown prince’s ascent to power as the kingdom’s de facto ruler.

Yet, experts speaking to The Cradle do not believe that these articles about Jabri’s allegation are in any way part of a US and/or UK government-led information campaign designed to put the screws on MbS.

“I don’t think the US government has any interest right now in putting pressure on MbS – certainly not … in this manner right now, or in any other manner,” Dr William Lawrence, a professor of political science and international affairs at American University’s School of International Service, tells The Cradle, adding:

I do know that there are people in the US and Britain that continue to put pressure on MbS, going back to his rise to power and subsequent firings, and going back to the Khashoggi murder. Those people kind of come and go in the media, and I would just call this a coming in the media of that crowd. There are Americans and British people in the crowd, some of whom have connections to both governments. But there’s no governmental effort going on here.

The same is true regarding the British government. At this point, analysts say that policymakers in London are not motivated to leverage pressure on MbS or Saudi Arabia as a country.

“The UK has no real issues with MbS’s Saudi Arabia beyond human rights issues – at the moment at least,” Dr Andreas Krieg, an associate professor at King’s College London, explains to The Cradle.

“The UK government has been fairly positive towards Saudi in terms of how they communicate, how they engage over trade and also security. The relationship between the UK and Riyadh has been a lot more constructive now over the last couple of years than it was six or seven years ago. So, there’s no reason for the UK to put pressure on MbS at this point,” he explained.

On the recent media blitz against MbS, Dr Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, a Fellow for the Middle East at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, says:

Journalists were reporting on an allegation made in a BBC documentary by [Jabri], which is why it was deemed to be newsworthy, given the nature of the allegation that was being made. The documentary itself featured a number of pro-regime voices and was balanced in its overall assessment of MbS.

Pragmatism over principle

The US and Saudi Arabia have long been at odds over a range of sensitive regional and international issues, including Ukraine, Gaza, Israeli normalization, Syria, and OPEC+. These disagreements have fueled some significant tension in Washington and Riyadh’s relationship. In essence, Saudi Arabia has demonstrated its determination to conduct a foreign policy that is increasingly autonomous from the US and much less western-centric in an increasingly multipolar world. And while US policymakers are frustrated over this, they lack the leverage to change Saudi behavior, especially given that they increasingly need Riyadh’s cooperation as West Asia’s conflicts escalate.

The Saudi response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine spoke volumes about Riyadh’s determination to chart its own course on the international stage and navigate multipolarity in manners that the kingdom’s leaders see as most beneficial to Saudi interests.

Not only did Saudi Arabia avoid implementing any of the west’s sanctions on Moscow, but it also maintained close coordination with Russia on energy policies via OPEC+ and even hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin on his first post-February 2022 trip to West Asia. Moreover, Saudi officials refrained from referring to a Russian “invasion” when discussing the conflict.

Despite these frictions, Washington is not airing its grievances publicly. While on the campaign trail in 2019, Joe Biden vowed to treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah” in response to human rights concerns, his administration has since taken a more pragmatic approach, closely cooperating with the kingdom. In reality, the White House has not treated Saudi Arabia as anything close to a “pariah.”

The US sees Riyadh holding special cards and being uniquely qualified to help Washington advance its interests across many portfolios. Rather than putting pressure on the kingdom, Biden’s team has done much to accommodate Saudi interests. The recent decision to resume the sale of offensive weapons to Riyadh illustrates this point.

The limits of US influence

Despite the Biden administration’s efforts to expand the scope of the 2020 Abraham Accords, Riyadh has stood firmly in favor of its long-held position that Israeli normalization can only happen after (as opposed to before) the brutal and dehumanizing Israeli occupation of Palestinian land ends and a Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders is established.

Although the Biden team has sought to bring other Arab states, including Libya, into the Abraham Accords, the White House has been most focused on Saudi Arabia normalizing with Israel – and Biden has long wanted this unrealized possibility to be a centerpiece of his foreign policy legacy. Mindful of Saudi Arabia’s leadership role in the Arab–Islamic world, vast energy resources, and geography, Riyadh formalizing relations with Tel Aviv would constitute a major victory for Washington from the standpoint of integrating Israel into the region.

At the end of the day, the White House sees Saudi Arabia as too important and influential a country for the US to ostracize.

Quickly shrugging off his election rhetoric against the Saudi crown prince, Biden made a controversial trip to Jeddah five months after the Russian invasion of Ukraine and had his famous “fist bump” moment with MbS. As former US ambassador to Tunisia, Gordon Gray tells The Cradle:

President Biden’s meeting with MbS in Jeddah … [in] July 2022 …reflected his realization that the United States could no longer treat Saudi Arabia as a ‘pariah,’ as candidate Biden had proposed in November 2019, if it wanted to advance US security interests in the Middle East.

“The Biden team has clearly concluded that MbS’ human rights record is no longer a motivating concern, as evidenced by the decision to once again allow the sale of so-called offensive weapons to the Saudis,” Dr Annelle Sheline, a Research Fellow in the Middle East program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, explains to The Cradle.

Pushing for normalization with Israel

The Biden administration will continue to value Saudi Arabia as a key player that Washington must work with, both when it comes to limiting the Gaza war’s spillover effects throughout West Asia and containing the region’s Resistance Axis, in addition to winding down the Sudanese conflict.

If the Israeli war on Gaza is over before Biden's term expires, his team will want to see Riyadh normalize with Tel Aviv - an obsession of this administration, the rest of Washington's policy establishment, and Israel.

Regardless of whether Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump enters the Oval Office in early 2025, this US-led push to bring the kingdom into the Abraham Accords will remain a key part of Washington’s West Asia foreign policy, even if such an outcome is highly unrealistic given Israel’s refusal to make even minimal concessions to the Palestinians.

US officials are well aware that any government-led information campaign to humiliate MbS would be counterproductive from the standpoint of trying to bring Saudi Arabia into the Israeli normalization camp.

Meanwhile, the Jabri case continues to unfold in Canada, where he has been living since the 2017 palace coup. When a former Saudi intelligence official like Jabri makes serious allegations against MbS, it is understandable why many journalists report on these claims.

Jabri has his own motivations for ensuring that, even as MbS rises as a global statesman, the west does not forget certain aspects of his ascent to power. Journalists, activists, and concerned citizens in the west who oppose their governments’ dealings with MbS and his welcome in their countries are eager to maintain pressure on the Saudi crown prince.

While western policymakers, particularly in the US and UK, display no overt intentions to pressure MbS at this time, last week's disparaging media headlines constituted a swat at a Saudi leader who holds the keys to numerous western interests in his hands.

https://thecradle.co/articles/new-alleg ... y-the-west

Three Israeli police officers shot dead near Hebron

The operation comes two days after two Israeli settlements in the Hebron area were targeted by car bombs

News Desk

SEP 1, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Yosri Aljamal/Reuters)

Three Israeli police officers were shot and killed on 1 September in a resistance operation in the village of Tarqumiya, north of Hebron in the occupied West Bank.


Resistance fighters opened fire at an Israeli police car near the Tarqumiya checkpoint. Two were declared dead at the scene, while the other died while on the way to the hospital.

The fighters carried out the attack from inside a vehicle, before fleeing on foot.

“Many forces launched a pursuit of the terrorists,” the army said, adding that the details of the attack “are under investigation.”

The operation came two days after resistance fighters carried out two car bomb attacks in two illegal settlements in the Hebron area. Both Palestinians were killed during the operations on 30 August, and the Israeli army imposed a siege on the city of Hebron.

It also comes in the midst of a massive Israeli army operation in the northern West Bank, focusing mainly on the cities of Jenin and Tulkarem.

The operation, dubbed “Camps of Summer,” was launched on 28 July, and has been described as the largest Israeli operation in the West Bank in over two decades.

Following the Israeli army's withdrawal from Tulkarem after the assassination of commander Mohammad Jaber (Abu Shujaa), fierce clashes between Palestinian resistance groups and the Israeli army have since been raging across the streets of Jenin, as well as in other areas, including Nablus.

“Our fighters are engaged in fierce clashes with the Zionist enemy forces storming the Askar camp, using machine guns and explosive devices,” the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades’ Nablus branch said in a statement early on 1 September.

Additional military reinforcements were deployed to the Jenin refugee camp on Saturday, where Israeli troops raided homes, detained Palestinian men, and demolished structures in several quarters of the camp.

Israel's Channel 14 cited reports of a serious security incident in Jenin camp on Saturday involving the use of RPGs for the first time.

Local sources reported that Palestinian resistance fighters ambushed Israeli soldiers in the Al-Damj neighborhood of the Jenin camp. Israeli helicopters were seen transporting casualties.

The Israeli army admitted to the death of one soldier on 31 August as a result of fighting in Jenin.

https://thecradle.co/articles/three-isr ... ear-hebron
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Sep 02, 2024 11:45 am

Palestinian Pastor Calls for an End to Colonialism, Empire, and Apartheid from MLK’s Pulpit
By Kenny Cordasco - August 31, 2024 0

Image
Dr. Munther Isaac delivering his remarks at Riverside Church. [Source: YouTube.com]

On April 4, 1967, from the pulpit of Manhattan’s storied Riverside Church, the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., delivered one of his most powerful sermons. Titled “Beyond Vietnam—A Time to Break Silence,” it was the first time King had publicly denounced the Vietnam War. He had long avoided doing so in the past, but finally concluded that his conscience left him “no other choice.” As he explained to the congregation, “a time comes when silence is betrayal.”

Dr. King’s breaking point had come shortly before, while he was at an airport, leafing through the pages of Ramparts magazine. He came to an article called “The Children of Vietnam,” which featured images of young Vietnamese “with amputated limbs, faces pockmarked by shrapnel scars, and bodies burned by napalm.” According to those who were with him, King vowed in that moment to do “everything I can to end that war.”[1]

Image
King delivers his “Beyond Vietnam” sermon at Riverside Church in Manhattan. [Source: gothamcenter.org]

By that time King was already despised by much if not most of white America, in the North as well as the South. But once he began to speak against the war, many of his former allies in the Civil Rights Movement distanced themselves from him, as he explained to the Riverside audience. Organizations like the NAACP and the Urban League were deeply unhappy with what they saw as “the ‘tactical mistake’ of trying to unite the peace and civil rights movements.” And embracing the anti-war cause certainly did not improve his relationship with the administration of Lyndon B. Johnson.

Obviously, King knew that his stance was going to be unpopular, but this did not deter him. From that Riverside Church pulpit, he urged the United States to “undergo a radical revolution of values,” namely a “shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society.” As long as “profit motives and property rights” were “considered more important than people,” he warned, “the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.”

King was assassinated on April 4, 1968—exactly one year after delivering “Beyond Vietnam.” In that all-too-brief interim, he continued to condemn American atrocities in Indochina. Both this activism and his sermon at Riverside in particular stand as powerful monuments to his legacy, and to the legacy of a politically engaged religious left.

Image
Riverside Church. [Source: nyclgbtsites.org]

From Vietnam to Gaza
It has been more than 57 years since King’s anti-war sermon. If he were alive today, he would surely be dismayed that his “radical revolution of values” has not occurred. With the United States directly enabling a genocide in Gaza, and with most religious and political leaders either unwilling to speak out, or else actively supportive of the Israeli cause, the parallels to 1967 are dismaying.

In the midst of our modern-day Vietnam, another activist minister has taken up King’s mission. On Wednesday, August 14, 2024, the Reverend Dr. Munther Isaac took to the same Riverside Church pulpit to deliver what amounted to a spiritual sequel to King’s “Beyond Vietnam” speech, titled “Silence Is Complicity.”

Image
Nativity scene with baby Jesus wrapped in a keffiyeh, displayed in Isaac’s Bethlehem Church. [Source: time.com]

A prominent Palestinian Christian leader, Reverend Isaac is the pastor of the Evangelical Lutheran Christmas Church in Bethlehem in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. Just as King’s ministry was informed by his personal experience with Jim Crow apartheid, so too has Isaac’s work been informed by his personal experience with Israeli apartheid, a topic he addressed in his remarks. “We are fearful of travelling from one Palestinian town to another—afraid of the violence of the settlers. Afraid of the checkpoint system”—referring to the apartheid system Israel has imposed on the West Bank where Isaac lives, which makes it almost impossible for Palestinians to travel anywhere, and where they are subject to shocking levels of violence from Israeli settlers.

While Isaac has long been a forceful advocate for the Palestinian people, his sermons began to receive considerably more attention after the Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023—particularly since December of that year, when Isaac delivered his Christmas sermon “Christ in the Rubble.” This moving speech made its way around the internet, and led to increasing visibility for the plight of the Palestinians in spaces and communities—namely, among American Christians—that had never considered the issue in the past.

The Palestinian Christian minority suffers just as much under Israeli rule as the Muslim majority. Palestinian Christians have not been shy about explaining this. And Israeli forces have made it clear through their behavior that they see all Palestinians, regardless of faith, as “terrorists” and “sub-human.”

To take just one example, recall the murder of prominent Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, whose Christian heritage (as well as clearly visible “PRESS” vest) did not save her from being executed by Israeli forces in what even CNN contends was a targeted killing. Israeli police proceeded to violently disrupt her Christian funeral service, brutally beating mourners and nearly causing the pallbearers to drop her coffin.

Image
Palestinian Christian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, who was executed by Israel in a targeted assassination in 2022. [Source: Britannica.com]

Despite incidents like this receiving international attention, until fairly recently most Americans had little idea that there were any Christians in Palestine. Journalist Adam Johnson, for instance, recounted that his Christian family members expressed disbelief when he attempted to explain this: “I’m like, well, where do you think Bethlehem is, exactly?” he joked.

Thanks to Reverend Isaac’s important work, and the work of organizations like Friends of Sabeel North America (FOSNA), the Palestinian Christian organization that advocates for the Palestinian cause and co-sponsored his appearance at Riverside, that is changing. Indeed, that a Palestinian would be invited to follow in King’s literal footsteps—Isaac noted that he was “both humbled and horrified” to be spoken of in the same sentence as “the great Christian leader”—is a sign of considerable progress.

Unfortunately, the increased visibility of Isaac and the Palestinian Christian community has not resulted in a significant number of American churches speaking up for Gaza. Thus, while Isaac’s sermon stressed that all Americans regardless of faith (or lack of it) needed to come to Gaza’s aid, the bulk of his remarks were directed at American churches, which he indicted for their inaction in the face of genocide, and for their refusal to label the Israeli project “apartheid.”

Christians Complicit
Isaac had choice words for American churches and their leadership. He noted that, unlike past genocides, this one has been playing out on social media, with many of the perpetrators boasting on various platforms about what they have been doing. Accordingly, since “no one can claim they did not know,” Isaac warned American faith leaders that “your apologies after the genocide will not be accepted.”

Granted, Isaac was not exclusively singling out religious institutions. At multiple points, he addressed the entire American public. “Friends, it’s your money. Your silence tells us that you approve of your tax dollars going to genocide,” he declared. To an extent he even extended that critique to the entire “West”—“I never want to hear any American or European lecture us on human rights again!”

Image
John Hagee meets with Donald Trump in the Oval Office in 2017. [Source: houstonchronicle.com]

The movement is represented by groups like Christians United for Israel (CUFI) and its leader, Pastor John Hagee—known for his belief that “God sent Adolf Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land,” for claiming “that the antichrist is a half-Jewish homosexual,” and for leaning in to “anti-Semitic theories about Jewish bankers controlling the Federal Reserve.” Despite this, Hagee has been enthusiastically embraced by the Israeli leadership, including Benjamin Netanyahu himself. The two have been long-time friends and political allies. Indeed, during Netanyahu’s recent visit to Congress, “one of the most shameful moments in American history,” and which Reverend Isaac condemned repeatedly in his sermon, Netanyahu paid Hagee and other Christian Zionist leaders a visit, praising their continued support to his government.

Image
Netanyahu meets with Pastor John Hagee and other Christian Zionists during his visit to the U.S. Congress. [Source: x.com]

As a result of the influence of this malign theology, Isaac argued, the issue of Palestine is the only one in the world where the reference point is religious, as opposed to the secular realm of international law. “How,” he asked, “can I argue with you, when your argument is ‘God said so?’” Apparently because they think they have God on their side, “so many pastors support the genocide.”

Isaac specifically singled out Michigan Republican Tim Walberg, who had been an Evangelical Pastor prior to his election to Congress. Asked by a constituent why the U.S. was spending money on a pier and other forms of humanitarian assistance, Walberg infamously replied, “We shouldn’t be spending a dime on humanitarian aid,” and said that Israel’s strategy “should be like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Get it over quick.” (Walberg also suggested that U.S. aid to Ukraine should not be for “humanitarian purposes,” but rather “to wipe out Russia, if that’s what we want to do.”)

Image
Congressman (and former Pastor) Tim Walberg, who encouraged Israel to nuke Gaza. [Source: Wikipedia.org].

Reverend Isaac admonished Pastor/Representative Walberg for suggesting that the atomic bombings of Japan could be justified, as well as for his theological reasoning—“what Jesus are you reading?” Indeed, Walberg’s remarks serve to highlight another crucial point Isaac made to his Riverside audience. “It’s good that Gaza has divided the world,” he insisted, because “we need to know where you stand.” The choice, he said, is clear: “Either you are with justice, or with apartheid. It’s that simple.”

It has thus been edifying to witness the GOP—fresh off its absurd attempt to rebrand itself as an anti-war organization opposed to “forever wars” in the Middle East—adopt some of the most unhinged, bloodthirsty rhetoric toward Gaza and Palestinians. While the Democratic Party has been disingenuously distancing itself (rhetorically) from Israel’s cruelty while continuing to fund and support it, the Republicans have been, to use Reverend Isaac’s terms, letting the world know exactly where they stand. In this respect, Walberg is in good company.

Self-described “Christian Nationalist” Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed that “Anyone that is pro-Palestinian is pro-Hamas.” Lindsey Graham urged Israel to “level the place,” arguing that, if Gaza does not “look like Tokyo and Berlin at the end of World War II,” then “Israel made a mistake.”

Image
Marjorie Taylor Greene [Source
: washingtonpost.com]
Florida’s Brian Mast (another evangelical) ranted to CodePink activists that “Israel should go in there and kick the shit out of them, just absolutely destroy them, their infrastructure, level anything that they touch,” and later claimed that “there are very few innocent Palestinian civilians.” Ohio’s Max Miller boasted that “we’re going to turn [Palestine] into a parking lot,” and said that there should be “no rules of engagement” for Israel. And Tennessee’s Andy Ogles, in comments that could have come straight from the satirical anti-fascist film Starship Troopers, declared: “I think we should kill ’em all!”

Image

So Christian Zionism is a major obstacle. But as Isaac went on to explain, it is not only the Christian Zionist churches that are complicit. He lamented that many mainline denominations have been shockingly supportive of Israel’s actions as well, including ones that have positioned themselves as “progressive.” This was especially galling for Isaac: “This is the church that doesn’t want to offend anybody, but is silent during a genocide!” Describing behind-the-scenes conversations with clergy from some of these denominations, Isaac reported that many told him they were personally against the Israeli assault, and “wished” that they could say so in public, but that they had no choice other than to stick to their denominations’ official positions.

Isaac’s advice to these religious leaders who claim to want to “say these things publicly” was blunt: “Well, you can.” Isaac implored that it was not too late for the churches to acknowledge the existence of empire and their complicity with it. He urged repentance, and action: “If it is apartheid, call it apartheid and act accordingly.” He called for an arms embargo on Israel, not just a cease-fire. And he was adamant that “those who commit war crimes,” the “architects of apartheid,” be held accountable for what they have done—not honored in the American Congress.

The World Did Not Deserve Them
While pained by the absence of any significant organized action on the part of his fellow Christians, Isaac was visibly moved by the support Palestinians have received from anti-Zionist Jewish groups, who have been steadfast in their rejection of Israeli policy. He was profoundly grateful for the courage of organizations like If Not Now and Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP). He specifically praised the clarity and simplicity of the latter’s stated position on Zionism, which he read aloud: “Jewish Voice for Peace is guided by a vision of justice, equality and freedom for all people. We unequivocally oppose Zionism because it is counter to those ideals.” “I wish Christians had the courage to call things as they are like this,” he said. [Emphasis added.]

Image
Reverend Isaac praised the anti-Zionist organization Jewish Voice for Peace [Source: jewishvoiceforpeace.org]

Isaac also praised the American university students who set up encampments across the country and kept the spotlight on Palestine. Alluding to student activism against the Vietnam War, Isaac noted that universities have historically been on the right side of history. “This is where the church belongs,” he declared. “The church belongs in the streets.” And he made a very important point that bears special emphasis given its importance for activists: “September is more important than November.” While most people are focused on the presidential race (November), Isaac stressed that he was much more concerned with what will happen in September—when college students return to their universities. He called on them to set up more encampments and to continue the fight. “Keep speaking truth,” he encouraged. “Be creative, nonviolent, and strong.”

His praise of the students was fitting. Riverside Church is just a few blocks from Columbia University, where some of the most committed students held out against police repression unleashed on them by Columbia President Minouche Shafik. In an utterly remarkable coincidence, during the follow-on Q&A after the sermon, one of Riverside’s clergy broke in to announce that Shafik had just resigned her position. This, like many of Reverend Isaac’s comments, was greeted with tremendous applause and cheers.

Image
Police face off against Columbia University students supporting Gaza. [source: latimes.com]

But the mood throughout the talk was for the most part somber, given the topic. In one of the evening’s most affecting moments, Isaac paused to honor the doctors, nurses and other aid workers, both those from Gaza and those who came from abroad to help in its hour of need. “The world was not worthy of them,” he intoned. Indeed, Israel has killed such heroic figures in astonishing numbers, often deliberately.

Demolishing Myths
American discourse around Israel and Palestine has traditionally been defined by a number of clichés and myths which have served to prevent the public from grasping the true nature of the situation on the ground. One of the most striking features of Reverend Isaac’s sermon was that he eviscerated virtually every single one of them.

First and foremost, he was explicit in identifying that “the war did not start on October 7th.” He argued that the genocide instead originated long ago with the phrase “a land without a people.”

This was of course a reference to the saying “a land without a people for a people without a land,” one of the most pervasive myths used to justify the British-backed Israeli colonization of Palestine, which at the time was absolutely not “a land without a people,” but fully inhabited by Palestinians who had been there for hundreds of years. But since, then as now, “many in the West don’t see us as human,” their gradual displacement and eventual ethnic cleansing was not viewed as problematic.[4]

Another refrain endlessly invoked in the United States is that Israel is “the only democracy in the Middle East.” Isaac had little patience for this. “I hope people realize how insulting it is to rub it in our faces that Israel is ‘the only democracy in the Middle East’ when Israel is an apartheid state.” Of course, the applicability of the term “apartheid” is also hotly contested by Israel’s supporters, who are reliably outraged that anyone would associate Israel with the despised former South African regime. Some might note that this outrage is historically illiterate, given that Israel was one of the only countries (other than the United States) to support South African apartheid to the very end, including a secret project to develop illegal nuclear weapons.

In case anyone needed convincing, Isaac cited the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, which titled its report describing the Israeli occupation “This is Apartheid.” Isaac read aloud the subtitle of that report, which described “a regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan river to the Mediterranean Sea.” That phrasing was designed to echo the cry “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” often invoked by Palestinians and their allies. The phrase is controversial because Israel’s supporters falsely insist that it is a cry for genocide against Israeli Jews. After reading from the B’Tselem report, Isaac quipped, “I wish those people offended by that phrase were as offended by the oppression of Palestinians from the river to the sea.”

Image
The Israeli human rights group B’Tselem has explicitly referred to Israel as an “apartheid” regime. [Source: btselem.org]

Isaac also called for the world to stop referring to “the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” “Stop talking about the Israel-Palestine conflict,” he demanded. “There is no conflict. We live under apartheid.” “There are not two sides that simply cannot get along,” he added.

He had no patience for those who would defend Zionism. “Zionism is racism. Call it what it is.” Of the early Zionist leaders, he remarked, “They told us what they were going to do, and then they did it.” Indeed, as early as 1895, Theodore Herzl, the “acknowledged leader of the growing [Zionist] movement he had founded,” was talking about expelling most Palestinians from their land:

“We must expropriate gently the private property on the estates assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless population across the border by procuring employment for it in the transit countries, while denying it employment in our own country. The property owners will come over to our side. Both the process of expropriation and the removal of the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly.”[5]

Image
Theodore Herzl [Source: nytimes.com]

As for the myth that Israel is “the most moral army in the world,” one of the most frequently deployed tropes, Isaac made quick work of it. “There are no safe zones in Gaza. They’re lying. No one is safe.” Indeed, as Isaac delivered his remarks, Israeli society was busy having a national debate over whether or not the IDF should formally institutionalize anally raping Palestinian prisoners as a standard practice—a topic American mainstream media have been scrupulously downplaying or outright ignoring.

Another ubiquitous myth about Israel—United States discourse really is full of them—is that its conduct somehow always amounts to “defense.” “Israel has a right to defend itself” was probably the most common excuse trotted out in the decades prior to October 7th. It was not credible then, and it is beyond farcical now. Yet we still hear it incessantly. Isaac identified the persistence of this cliché as an example of “the problem of empire dictating the terms.” “How,” he wondered, “is the colonizer defending itself against the colonized?”

Furthermore, it is indicative of a deeply perverse double standard. “If Israel has a right to defend itself, do Palestinians ever get that right?” Isaac was quick to clarify that he had always been and will always be an advocate for peaceful means of resistance only; his point was merely to highlight the disparity between how Palestinian violence (resistance to colonialism) and Israeli violence (prior to and exponentially greater than Palestinian violence) is described.

And on the topic of October 7th, Isaac was unequivocal: “I hope we all agree that killing families in their home or kidnapping children is wrong. It’s evil and it must be condemned.” And yet once more the double standard rears its ugly head. “9,000 Palestinians have been kidnapped since October 7th. Why is everyone silent?” They’ve been “tortured, starved, raped, left to die in detention.” “Are we less human?”

It is dismaying that any of these talking points are still around ten months into the genocide. Yet with powerful spokespeople like Isaac communicating their absurdity directly to American audiences, their once-unbreakable grip on the national conversation at least has begun to weaken.

Hope
One theme of Isaac’s speech that came up repeatedly was the indescribably tragic story of Mohammad Abu Al-Qumsan and his family, which has quickly become a metaphor for the brutal, inhuman cruelty that has been meted out on Gaza.

Al-Qumsan’s 28-year-old wife Jumana delivered twins, Aysal and Aser, on August 11. On August 14th—the day of Isaac’s sermon—the IDF killed the four-day-old infants and their mother in a strike on their apartment in Deir al-Balah, while Mohammad was out collecting their birth certificates.

Mohammad had just relocated his family to Deir al-Balah “in a desperate attempt to protect his then-pregnant wife from Israel’s relentless bombing campaign on Gaza.” Footage of the emotionally distraught father reacting to the news, with the birth certificates in hand and sobbing uncontrollably, is difficult to view.

Image
Mohammad Abu Al-Qumsan with the birth certificates of his just-murdered twin children. [Source: nbcnews.com]

“How many more need to be killed before the world sees the children of Gaza as human?” Isaac asked. “I feel compelled to say their names—Aysal and Aser—they joined more than 16,000 children killed in this war—which includes more than 2,000 infants.”

With horrors like this occurring daily, and with the Biden administration responding by funneling an additional $3.5 billion to Israel for weapons purchases, it would seem impossible to have hope—perhaps even wrong to try. What right do comfortable Westerners have to long for hope, given what Gazans are experiencing?

And indeed, Isaac’s speech could hardly be characterized as overly optimistic. It was not meant to be. It was meant to spur people to action.

Yet there were a few moments where Reverend Isaac came across as remarkably hopeful despite it all. Of particular note was his reply upon being asked how to reach Christian Zionists. He did not declare those Evangelicals unreachable—far from it. Rather, he suggested that people simply “have conversations with them, guided by kindness yet also boldness. Many can be reached because they are simply misinformed.” He added that he has personally seen many of them change, with some becoming very effective advocates for Palestine.

When I heard him give that answer, I was reminded of something similar that the radical historian Howard Zinn once said: “I believe people are basically decent, they just lack information.” Isaac and Zinn are right, I would argue. After all, if literal Israel lobby members can become anti-Zionist activists, anyone can be reasoned with.

Isaac may have sensed that some in the audience believed that such tactics—gradual persuasion through gentle yet firm conversations—were insignificant given the scale of the onslaught. This may be why he went out of his way to encourage his listeners to pursue such actions. “We might think that what we’re doing is not achieving results. We might feel helpless and hopeless, but as I keep saying, we cannot stop.” He encouraged his multifaith audience that “small initiatives that you have done in the basements of mosques or churches or synagogues, in which you have begun to initiate change,” are vitally important. Especially if we are to accomplish what he called for in his closing remarks—for “empire, colonialism and apartheid” to be “dismantled once and for all, not just in South Africa or in Palestine, but everywhere.”

Amen.


1.This incident is recounted in Christian G. Appy, American Reckoning: The Vietnam War and Our National Identity (New York: Viking, 2015), pp. 59-62. ↑

2.Carlo Aldrovandi, “Theo-Politics in the Holy Land: Christian Zionism and Jewish Religious Zionism.” Religion Compass, vol. 5, no. 4 (2011), pp. 114–28. ↑

3.Ilan Pappe, Ten Myths About Israel (Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2017), pp. 4 and 12. ↑

4.For an introduction to what Palestine and its inhabitants were like prior to the beginning of the colonization process, see Pappe, Ten Myths About Israel, chapter 1: “Palestine Was an Empty Land.” See also chapter 2: “The Jews Were a People Without a Land.” ↑

5.Herzl quoted in Rashid Khalidi, The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917-2017 (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2020), p. 4. ↑

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2024/0 ... ks-pulpit/

******

The ‘Palestinian Authority’ in Ramallah Is Complicit and Involved in Crimes Against Our People in the West Bank and Gaza
August 31, 2024

Image
The March for Return and Liberation in Brussels, Belgium, on 29 October, 2022. Photo: Masar Badil.

By Palestinian Alternative Revolutionary Path Movement – Aug 29, 2024

Khaled Barakat, a member of the Executive Committee of the Masar Badil, the Palestinian Alternative Revolutionary Path Movement, confirmed that the Palestinian Authority and some of its security services are “involved in the Zionist-US crimes being committed in the refugee camps and cities of the occupied West Bank, and in the siege and ongoing war of genocide against our people in the Gaza Strip.”

Barakat once again emphasized the position of the Masar in a series of political seminars and media interviews with Palestinian, Arab and international media outlets, accusing “the so-called Palestinian leadership in Ramallah” of involvement in “political crimes that reached the level of national treason, conspiracy against the resistance and stabbing it in the back,” stressing that these are “serious and documented crimes that will not be subject to any statute of limitations, and the day will come when the Palestinian people will put them on trial, no matter how long it takes.”



Barakat considered the “security coordination” apparatus, which works directly with the Zionist regime and imperialist powers like the United States, in the Palestinian Authority to be “a battalion of agents affiliated with the occupation and a security and economic tool attached to American, European and Saudi directions and an integral part of the official Arab regimes, divided between the helpless and the complicit.”

Barakat called for “isolating the authority and boycotting it publicly at all levels,” considering that “the armed Palestinian resistance is the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people and not any other party.”

(Masar Badil)

https://orinocotribune.com/the-palestin ... -and-gaza/

******

A Quick, Aggressive Response to Israel May Not Be Useful for Iran
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 1, 2024
Tehran Tapdigov

Image
After the killing of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Iran, the situation between Iran and Israel was expected to become more tense. Iran has officially declared that it will take strict retaliatory measures. However, after the killing of the Hamas leader by Israel in Tehran, Iran has not yet taken serious measures.

Though having repeatedly threatened Israel, why can Iran not respond?

Commenting on the topic, Iranian political scientist Ahmad Habibi noted that a quick or aggressive response may not be useful for Iran at the moment.


Iran’s possible calculations

Why hasn’t Iran responded to Israel yet?

Iran’s decision not to immediately respond to Israel can be attributed to several layers of strategic and geopolitical considerations. At the forefront is the complex and often delicate balance that Iran maintains within the region and on the global stage. Responding too quickly or aggressively could escalate tensions in a manner that might not be beneficial for Iran at this moment.

One key factor could be Iran’s internal political dynamics. The country is led by a regime that is highly strategic in its actions, often preferring to calculate every move with an eye on long-term outcomes rather than short-term gains. Iran’s leadership, particularly the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has always been cautious about direct military engagement, especially with a state like Israel, which has powerful allies including the United States.

Additionally, Iran might be considering the broader implications of its response on its ongoing diplomatic and economic engagements. The country is under intense international scrutiny, especially regarding its nuclear program and its involvement in various regional conflicts. A rash response could derail any potential negotiations or exacerbate the already stringent sanctions’ regime imposed by Western nations. It’s possible that Iran is taking time to gauge the international community’s reaction, especially from major players like Russia and China, before deciding on its next move.

Another layer to consider is the state of Iran’s military and economic capacity. The Iranian economy has been severely weakened by sanctions, and its military capabilities, while substantial, might not be prepared for a full-scale confrontation with Israel. Iran might be using this time to strengthen its alliances with regional proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon or Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria, potentially preparing for a more distributed or asymmetric response rather than a direct confrontation.

Moreover, Iran might also be considering non-military responses, such as cyberattacks or economic pressures, which could be seen as less escalating but still impactful. The Iranian regime has a history of engaging in cyber warfare, and this might be a more palatable option at this juncture. Cyber operations can provide a means of retaliation that doesn’t immediately lead to a full-scale military conflict, but still sends a strong message to Israel and the international community.

Lastly, the psychological aspect cannot be overlooked. Iran might be leveraging this delay as a form of psychological warfare, creating uncertainty and tension not just in Israel but across the region. By not responding immediately, Iran leaves Israel and its allies in a state of constant vigilance, potentially wearing down their resources and morale over time.

Should we not expect a response from Iran?

While the current lack of action from Iran might suggest that a response is not imminent, it would be premature to conclude that Iran will not respond at all. Historically, Iran has often preferred to take its time, choosing the moment that it deems most advantageous to strike back. Therefore, a lack of immediate retaliation should not be interpreted as an indication that Iran has opted out of responding altogether.

Iran’s approach to conflict and retaliation is deeply rooted in its strategic culture, which favors asymmetric warfare, indirect confrontation, and the use of proxies. This means that Iran might choose to respond through one of its allied groups, such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, or various militias in Iraq and Syria. By using these proxies, Iran can strike at Israel’s interests without directly involving itself, thus minimizing the risk of a full-scale war.

Furthermore, Iran’s leadership might be waiting for the right geopolitical climate to deliver a response that would be most effective. For instance, Iran could be waiting for a moment when Israel is more diplomatically isolated or when global attention is diverted by another crisis.

This kind of timing would allow Iran to maximize the impact of its actions while minimizing the risks.

Another possibility is that Iran might opt for a non-military response, such as leveraging its influence in international organizations or using economic measures to retaliate. For example, Iran could seek to influence OPEC oil production decisions to harm Israel’s economic interests or could engage in diplomatic efforts to isolate Israel further on the global stage.

It is also worth considering that Iran might be preparing for a long-term strategy rather than an immediate response. This could involve building up its military capabilities, strengthening alliances with other anti-Israel factions, and waiting for a more opportune time to act. This approach would be consistent with Iran’s historical behavior, where patience and long-term planning are key components of its strategic outlook.

Broader international diplomatic context of Iran

How does this situation impact Iran’s image?

The impact of Iran’s lack of an immediate response on its image, both domestically and internationally, is complex and multifaceted. On one hand, the delay in responding could be seen as a calculated move, displaying strategic patience and a preference for measured actions over rash decisions. On the other hand, it could also be perceived as a sign of weakness, hesitation, or even fear, particularly by those who expect Iran to take a hard-line stance against Israel.

Domestically, Iran’s image among its citizens and supporters of the regime could be affected by this delay. The Iranian regime has built much of its legitimacy on its resistance to Israel and its stance as a defender of the oppressed in the region, particularly the Palestinians. A perceived failure to respond forcefully to Israeli actions could lead to disillusionment among some segments of the population, especially those who are more hard-line in their views. This could potentially fuel internal dissent or weaken the regime’s standing among its core supporters.

However, it’s also possible that many Iranians, particularly those who are weary of conflict and the economic hardships that come with it, might view the lack of immediate retaliation as a sign of prudence. For a population that has endured years of economic sanctions and isolation, avoiding a direct confrontation with Israel might be seen as a way to prevent further suffering. This could bolster the regime’s image as a careful and thoughtful leadership that prioritizes the well-being of its people over reckless adventurism.

Internationally, the situation is equally nuanced. Among Iran’s allies and those sympathetic to its cause, the delay might be seen as a tactical move, one that reflects a deep understanding of the geopolitical landscape. These groups might respect Iran’s decision to avoid immediate escalation, recognizing that a well-timed response could be more effective in the long run.

On the flip side, among Iran’s adversaries and critics, the lack of an immediate response could be interpreted as a sign of vulnerability. It could embolden Israel and its allies, encouraging them to continue with actions that challenge Iran’s influence in the region. This could lead to a further erosion of Iran’s standing as a regional power, potentially weakening its ability to project strength and influence.

Moreover, the global perception of Iran’s image might be influenced by how other international actors, particularly major powers like the United States, Russia, and China react to the situation. If these countries perceive Iran’s delay as a sign of restraint and a desire to avoid conflict, it could lead to diplomatic opportunities for Iran. Conversely, if they see it as a sign of weakness, it could result in increased pressure and isolation.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... -for-iran/

******

Israel's national labor union announces general strike after dead captives found in Gaza

The strike was called to push the Netanyahu government to reach a ceasefire and prisoner exchange deal with Hamas

News Desk

SEP 1, 2024

Image
Israelis attend the weekly rally calling for the return of hostages held by Hamas terrorists in the Gaza Strip, at Hostages Square in Tel Aviv, January 6, 2024. (Photo credti: Miriam Alster/Flash90)

The Secretary General of Israel's national workers union announced a general strike for 2 September in protest of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's refusal to reach an immediate prisoner exchange and Gaza ceasefire deal, Axios reports.

The strike will affect the municipalities of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa, along with various universities, government ministries, and public transportation networks.

"The hostage deal is stuck because of domestic political considerations," the secretary general of the Histadrut, Arnon Bar David, said at a press conference surrounded by families of the captives.

"Instead of a deal, we get body bags. We hope that our intervention might shock those who need to be shocked. I call on the people of Israel to go to the street and sound the cry of the hostages and their families," he said.


The announcement of the general strike for Monday came after the Israeli army found six dead captives inside a tunnel in Gaza's southernmost city of Rafah overnight.

The captives were "brutally murdered" by Hamas before troops arrived, an Israeli army statement on Sunday morning claimed.

In contrast, a senior Hamas official stated that the six Israeli captives were killed as a result of ongoing Israeli airstrikes, which have also killed tens of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza since 7 October.

Last month, another six Israeli captives were found dead in southern Gaza. Hebrew news site Ynet reported at the time that they had suffocated to death due to carbon dioxide, which flooded the tunnel they were in as a result of an Israeli army airstrike.

Israeli officials said at least three of the captives found dead on Sunday were supposed to be released in the first phase of the ceasefire deal that is currently being negotiated.

The families of the captives will hold a mass demonstration outside the Israeli military headquarters on Sunday night.

A general strike called by the union, known as the Histadrut, may be powerful enough to completely shut down the country and comes as the Israeli economy is already under pressure. Forty-six thousand Israeli businesses have been forced to shut as a result of the ongoing war and its devastating effect on the economy, Hebrew newspaper Maariv reported on 10 July, referring to Israel as a “country in collapse.”

But families of Israeli soldiers held captive by Hamas in Gaza hope Monday's strike will help to mobilize mass protests and press Netanyahu to drop his new demand that the army maintain a long-term occupation of the Philadelphi corridor on the Egypt-Gaza border.


Since Hamas agreed to an Israeli ceasefire and prisoner swap proposal in July, Netanyahu has added new demands, leading many Israelis to believe he is seeking to sabotage the negotiations.

A lasting military presence in the Philadelphi Corridor, as well as in the Netzarim Corridor which bisects northern and southern Gaza, will enable Israel to intervene militarily anywhere in the strip and open the door for the renewed Jewish settlement moving forward.

Axios adds that the Histadrut last called for a general strike in March 2023 after Netanyahu fired Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant over his opposition to the judicial overhaul plan.

The general strike will begin on Monday at 6:00 am local time, and Ben Gurion International Airport will shut down at 8:00 am local time.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israels-n ... nd-in-gaza

Hundreds of thousands take the streets of Israel after more captives found dead in Gaza

A strike called by Israel’s Labor Union has seen businesses and public services shut down across the country in protest against the government

News Desk

SEP 2, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Flash90)

Hundreds of thousands of Israelis flooded the streets of several cities late on 1 September to demand the return of prisoners held by Hamas. Around 500,000 are expected to join the protests on Monday.

“It seems this is the biggest set of protests that we’ve seen since the beginning of this round of horrific assaults on Gaza that began after October 7,” Phyllis Bennis, a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies and an international adviser to Jewish Voice for Peace, said on Monday, calling the demonstrations a “big deal.”

Israeli police fired stun grenades at protesters on Sunday night. Hebrew media reports that over a dozen were detained at the Tel Aviv demonstrations.


Israel’s Histradut Labor Union called a general strike for 2 September in protest against the government’s delay in reaching a prisoner exchange deal. Dozens of protesters blocked roads in Tel Aviv and the northern city of Rosh Pina early on Monday, demanding that the government finalize a deal to release captives held by the Palestinian resistance in Gaza.

Hebrew news site Ynet reported on Monday that the strike had disrupted light rail services in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

The main shopping malls in Israel have all been shuttered, as have several banks, government ministries, and tech companies. Israel’s business forum will also join the strike.

The Israeli State Prosecutor has petitioned the Labor Court to rule against the strike.

The petition requested that the court rule that “the strike announced by the Histadrut chairman, regarding all employees of the state, is not a strike for a collective labor dispute, and is, therefore, a political strike.”

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Monday that workers on strike would not be paid.

The protests and general strike were sparked by the Israeli army’s discovery of six dead captives in a tunnel in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah.

Israel’s opposition and the families of Israeli captives in Gaza, as well as Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, have grown increasingly frustrated with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s continued obstruction of ceasefire and prisoner exchange negotiations, which they believe is the only way to retrieve the other captives.

Gallant called on 1 September for an urgent reversal of the vote taken days ago by the security cabinet in favor of Netanyahu’s position to keep troops along the Gaza–Egypt border, which is one of the main obstacles to reaching an agreement.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hundreds- ... ad-in-gaza

US drafts ‘final proposal’ for Gaza ceasefire: ‘Take it or leave it’

One-sided negotiations have been ongoing for weeks without the presence of Hamas

News Desk

SEP 2, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AFP)

The US is working with Egyptian and Qatari mediators on a final “take it or leave it” ceasefire and exchange proposal for Gaza which it will present to the parties involved in the coming weeks, the Washington Post reported on 1 September.

If both sides refuse the proposal, this “could mark the end of the American-led negotiations,” an unnamed senior US official told the outlet. “You can’t keep negotiating this. This process has to be called at some point.”

The official told the Washington Post that US, Qatari, and Egyptian mediators had been working on the final proposal before the discovery of the six dead captives in Gaza over the weekend. “Does it derail the deal? No. If anything, it should add additional urgency in this closing phase, which we were already in.”

Last month, the US negotiated a “bridging proposal” to find common ground between the two parties. However, Hamas opted out due to the inclusion of several of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s conditions, namely continued troop presence along the Gaza–Egypt border and Netzarim corridor and a screening mechanism to inspect displaced Gazans from returning to north Gaza.

It also included a right for Israel to resume fighting the war once captives were swapped. Hamas – which since the start of the war has held fast to its terms for a permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza – has demanded the return to a proposal which it accepted on 2 July, based on the outline announced by US President Joe Biden in May.

Biden announced the plan in late May and said Israel itself had put it on the table, yet Netanyahu rejected the proposal and called it “incomplete.” Hamas was informed at the time that Israel had accepted the deal.

Hebrew news site Ynet reported on Monday, citing a senior security official, that had Netanyahu accepted the July proposal which Hamas agreed to, the lives of the six captives found dead in Rafah over the weekend could have been saved.

According to the Israeli source, four of the six bodies found in the tunnel were persons on the list of captives who would have been swapped as part of that deal.

Netanyahu and his security cabinet voted overwhelmingly last week in favor of keeping Israeli forces along the Philadelphi corridor on the Gaza–Egypt border, causing outrage among officials and the captives’ families who are desperate for a deal that Hamas will be willing to accept.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant called on 1 September for an immediate reversal of the vote.

“The Philadelphi Corridor is a lifeline for Hamas and cannot be withdrawn from,” the premier said on Monday, according to the Israeli Broadcasting Authority.

Hamas confirmed on 1 September its commitment to nothing other than the 2 July proposal based on Biden’s May outline.

“If the occupation does not abide by the conditions of 2 July, we will not engage in the issue of negotiations. They are talking right and left, but we asked them if they reached anything, and they answered that they did not reach any agreement at any point, and they were unable to force the occupation to back down from its new conditions,” senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya told Al Jazeera on Sunday.

“The first obstacle today is the withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor. This is a crucial condition. Without a withdrawal from Philadelphi, the Rafah crossing, and Netzarim, there is no agreement,” he added.

http://thecradle-main.oss-eu-central-1. ... 2c055.jpeg
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Sep 03, 2024 11:23 am

Israeli security minister ‘using all power’ to block Gaza ceasefire deal

The Army Radio says Netanyahu is avoiding a deal with Hamas out of fear of Ben Gvir and Smotrich, who wish to continue the war to destroy Gaza

News Desk

SEP 2, 2024

Image
Head of the Otzma Yehudit party National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir leads a faction meeting at the Knesset, June 12, 2023. (Photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir is trying to use his powers to block negotiations for a Gaza ceasefire and prisoner exchange deal, Haaretz reported on 2 September.

“Today, we have power in the government, and I’m not ashamed to say that we’re using this power to prevent a reckless deal and to stop any negotiations altogether,” Ben Gvir stated while speaking to members of Forum Hagvurah.

The forum’s members were protesting outside the Prime Minister’s Office against the general strike called by the Histradrut, Israel’s labor federation.

The Histradrut had called for the strike Monday to demand Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reach a deal to retrieve the Israeli captives being held by Hamas in Gaza.

“You give us the strength, so keep shouting, and we will do our job to ensure that Netanyahu doesn’t fold and that there won’t be a reckless deal,” he added.

Israeli radio reported on Sunday that Netanyahu is not seeking a deal with Hamas out of fear of his ministers, including Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.

The radio denied that reaching a deal with Hamas amounted to a surrender to the Palestinian movement because the army claims it has killed about 18,000 members of Hamas’ armed wing, the Qassam Brigades.

This comes as the Israeli army announced the recovery of the bodies of six Israeli captives held by Palestinian factions in Gaza since 7 October.

Israel claims Hamas executed those captives. Hamas says Israeli airstrikes killed them.

The recovery of their bodies sparked widespread anger in Israel, new protests from opposition parties against Netanyahu, and the Histradrut general strike.

Israel’s ongoing war on Gaza has killed over 40,000 people, displaced over 90 percent of the strip’s 2.3 million residents, and destroyed the vast majority of its homes, hospitals, schools, mosques, churches, and water and power infrastructure.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-s ... efire-deal

Israeli troops expel Palestinians in Jenin as bloody West Bank assault enters sixth day

Resistance fighters in Jenin continued to confront Israeli forces in the city with gunfire and explosive devices

News Desk

SEP 2, 2024

Image
Wreckage in Jenin caused by the Israeli army's destruction of infrastructure. (Photo credit: X)

Israel’s wide-scale scale assault on the occupied West Bank entered its sixth day on 2 September, with over a dozen arrests made by Israeli troops.

“The Israeli occupation forces detained at least 20 Palestinians from the occupied West Bank, including a girl and former prisoners,” the Palestinian Prisoners Society (PPS) said in a statement, according to WAFA news agency.

Israeli forces continued their incursion into the city of Jenin and its refugee camp. Clashes continued between the Israeli army and Palestinian resistance factions in Jenin.

“Our fighters continue to target enemy forces on the fighting fronts in Jenin camp, and our heroes on the various fighting fronts continue to shower the occupation forces with heavy volleys of bullets and explosive devices, achieving direct hits,” the Jenin Brigade of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement’s Quds Brigades said in a statement on 2 September.

Troops also raided the villages of Deir Abu Daif and Yamoun near Jenin, detaining several, including the brother of the famous prisoner Zakaria al-Zubaidi.

Israeli forces also “continued to forcibly evacuate families from their homes” in the Jenin refugee camp, WAFA reported.

Ayman Abed, a Palestinian resident of Kafr Dan village near Jenin who was kidnapped from his home by Israeli forces earlier on 2 September, has been pronounced dead. He was beaten and tortured to death by Israeli troops at the Salem checkpoint.

The Israeli army withdrew from the eastern section of Jenin on 1 September, leaving behind a massive trail of destruction.



Israeli forces withdrew from the West Bank cities of Tulkarem and Tubas last week after conducting brutal assaults and assassinating a prominent resistance commander along with several of his companions.

The Israeli army has killed 29 people in the West Bank since launching its operation late last month. The toll includes 18 killed in Jenin, four in Tulkarem, four in Tubas, and three in Hebron.

Hamas’ armed wing claimed responsibility on 2 September for the two blasts which took place last week in two Israeli settlements in the Hebron area.

The Qassam Brigades announced “full responsibility for the Gush Etzion and Karmi Tzur settlement operations near the city of Hebron in the southern occupied West Bank, which our Mujahideen put into effect at exactly 23:00 on the evening of Friday.”

The two fighters who carried out the operations, Mohammed Ihsan Marqa and Zuhdi Nidal Abu Afifa, were killed by Israeli forces at the scenes of the two simultaneous operations after the successful detonation of the explosives on Friday.

Three Israeli police officers were killed in Hebron on 1 September. Israeli forces tracked down the man responsible, a member of the Palestinian Presidential Guard, shooting and killing him on Sunday.

Hebron has witnessed increased resistance activity since the start of the massive Israeli assault on the West Bank.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-t ... -sixth-day

Declaring war on the West Bank will only sink Israel deeper

Israel’s aggressive expansion into the West Bank, echoing the devastation in Gaza, reveals a broader strategy to crush the Palestinian resistance, exert further control, and reshape the region — yet all it does is hasten the collapse of the Oslo framework and the collaborative Palestinian Authority.


Khalil Harb

SEP 2, 2024

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

The current Israeli invasion of the already occupied West Bank has exposed the stark reality of Israel and its decades-long occupation of Palestine: the extent of extremism within its government, the repetitive and ineffective tactics of its army, the diminishing “authority” of Mahmoud Abbas, the obsolescence of the Oslo Accords, the increased pressure on the Jordanian monarchy, and the undeniable complicity of the US in these daily atrocities.

This major offensive in the West Bank — the occupation state’s largest since the Second Intifada, carries profound implications. As the Israeli government continues its 11th month of war against the Gaza Strip, it has expanded its genocidal campaign to another part of historic Palestine, signaling a new phase of conflict akin to a "Gaza 2.0."

Gaza 2.0

By attacking the West Bank, Israel has made clear that its actions against Gaza were not solely a reaction to last year’s Hamas-led resistance operation, Al-Aqsa Flood, but are part of a broader strategy to "Judaize" all of Palestine, as Palestinian resistance groups have continuously asserted since the latest war erupted.

During the latest session of the Israeli government's weekly meeting, Israeli Minister of Environmental Protection Idit Silman placed the cities of Jenin and Nablus in the same category as the Gaza-Egypt border and reiterated Israel's right to all of Palestine, stating:

In the Philadelphi Corridor, in Jenin and Nablus, we must attack in order to inherit the land. This is the term that must be used (inheritance), not the term ‘occupation’ of the land.

The same day, Minister of Settlements and National Missions Orit Strook called on Israel's Military Secretary and security cabinet to “declare a state of war in the West Bank.”

Indeed, the factors driving the current explosion in the West Bank mirror those that ignited Gaza. Since the war on Gaza began, Israel has intensified its brutal tactics in the West Bank: over 650 Palestinians have been killed, including over 150 children.

The occupation forces have conducted more than 10,300 operations, accompanied by an increase in settlement activity and the distribution of tens of thousands of weapons to settler gangs, further escalating attacks on indigenous Palestinian communities.

Even Ronen Bar, the head of Israel's own security agency, the Shin Bet, has warned of the rise in "Jewish terrorism," cautioning that such extremism could further damage Tel Aviv’s international standing and regional alliances.

Despite these warnings, the occupation state has learned little from its short past. Israel's ongoing campaign in the West Bank continues to employ familiar but futile tactics — assassinations (most recently and notably, Tulkarem's Abu Shujaa), destruction (especially in Jenin and Tulkarem), imprisonment, intimidation, land confiscation, and the demolition of homes and infrastructure — all in a futile attempt to uproot Palestinian resistance, which has been developing its capabilities despite harsh, repressive conditions.

The current aggression, driven by the ultra-nationalist factions within the Israeli government, is a calculated move to exert control over the West Bank, similar to its brutal tactics in Gaza.

“We must deal with the threat just as we deal with the terrorist infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary evacuation of Palestinian residents and whatever steps are required. This is a war for everything and we must win it,” Foreign Minister Israel Katz.

At least for the short-term, Israel has been emboldened by favorable conditions: widespread support among the Israeli public for aggressive actions, the need for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to claim an internal "victory," and a sense of impunity bolstered by the lack of effective US or Arab deterrence.

Opening the floodgates of resistance

Israel’s largest West Bank raid since 2002 reveals that the occupation state’s strategy is not just a reaction to isolated events but a broader campaign to dismantle Palestinian society and resistance and deny Palestinians their future aspirations.

The invasion is not merely a continuation of the response to the Al-Aqsa Flood; rather, it is part of a larger effort to target Palestinians wherever they are and break their morale. The tactics employed in Gaza — destruction, devastation, and death — are being replicated, albeit to a lesser degree, in the West Bank, despite the lack of success in Gaza and the growing resistance it has ignited.

The West Bank has witnessed not only a rise in conventional resistance operations (coordinated by Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad), such as shootings, stabbings, ambushes, and ramming attacks, but also the return of martyrdom operations and car bombs and the emergence of the use of RPG shells for the first time.

Israeli leaders and ultra-nationalist factions have long advocated for inflicting severe pain on Palestinians, and Netanyahu now sees an opportunity to achieve this through a new wave of violence in key West Bank cities like Jenin, Tulkarem, Tubas, Nablus, Ramallah, and most recently, Hebron.

Jenin, in particular, the focal point of the 2002 battle (and the more recent ‘Battle of the Fury of Jenin’ in July 2023), is seen as a persistent threat to the occupation entity, namely due to the camp's residents showing strong social cohesion, which “Unlike many other cities and villages in the West Bank, the camp is not characterized by political divisions.”

Abbas' ‘Authority' hangs by a thread

However, Netanyahu may not have fully considered the risks. The situation in 2024 is not the same as in 2002; Israel is already engaged in multiple conflicts on different fronts as it climbs the escalation ladder. If the West Bank is subjected to a "Gaza 2.0" scenario — with systematic destruction, coordinated attacks, and massive displacement — the fragile Palestinian Authority (PA) under Abbas could collapse, burying the Oslo Accords indefinitely and further eroding any prospects for the so-called two-state solution.

Abbas is facing unprecedented challenges. He is besieged by anger from Palestinians in the West Bank, who are frustrated by the ongoing suffering of their brethren in Gaza, by the financial stranglehold imposed by Israel, and by the relentless expansion of settlements. Criticism of Abbas has reached a crescendo across the West Bank, highlighting the disillusionment with the PA's inability to protect Palestinian rights or halt repeated Israeli incursions, as well as its unwavering security coordination with the Israeli occupation.

The collapse of the Oslo Accords would have far-reaching consequences. The international community's investment in the PA as an alternative to armed struggle would be rendered useless. It would be increasingly difficult to convince any Palestinian or Arab that peace is possible with the current Israeli leadership, which is marked by its ultra-nationalist and militaristic stance.

The war beyond the West Bank

The crisis is not limited to the Palestinian territories. In Jordan, King Abdullah II faces growing challenges as the Israeli invasion of the West Bank threatens to destabilize his kingdom. Amman, much Ramallah, is caught in a web of conflicting pressures — unable to sever ties with Israel or fully align with Palestinian resistance, and now potentially facing a refugee crisis if Palestinians are displaced en masse from the West Bank.

It is easy to envision the Jordanian king becoming ensnared in a wave of public outrage if this scenario unfolds. This is not mere speculation. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz, for instance, has underscored the strategic significance of Israel's actions in the West Bank by claiming that Iran is attempting to establish a "terrorist front" there, similar to those in Gaza and Lebanon. Arming the West Bank resistance is a long-standing ambition of the Islamic Republic, which has reportedly been conducting a covert smuggling operation over the past two years.

Other Arab nations that have signed peace treaties or normalized ties with Israel – i.e., Egypt, UAE, Morocco, Bahrain – can find themselves in a similar position as Amman if the Israeli onslaught in the West Bank continues, as Tel Aviv's actions are a direct affront to the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, ratified by the Arab League as recently as 2017. This initiative, which Saudi Arabia has placed at the heart of a long-sought Israel normalization deal, calls for a full withdrawal of the Israeli army from the occupied territories (including the West Bank, Gaza, the Golan Heights, and Lebanon), a "just settlement" of the Palestinian refugee crisis based on UN Resolution 194, and the establishment of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. Instead, the number of Jewish settlers in the West Bank has skyrocketed from roughly 70,000 in the year 2002 to 800,000 in 2024, leaving no room for the ‘Palestinian state’ that normalizing Arab countries claim they are working towards.

What Netanyahu is doing now serves as nothing more than a catalyst for Israel's inevitable end, and this is demonstrated by his true desire to bury the idea of a promised Palestinian state, as is shown through Israel's actions in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

As Israel pushes forward with its aggressive agenda, the US’s stance has also come into sharper focus. With significant military deployments in the region and continued support for Israeli actions, Washington's tacit approval – whoever ends up in the White House, provides Netanyahu with the latitude to escalate the conflict further, potentially at the expense of regional stability.

Netanyahu's pursuit of power through forceful means risks provoking a regional earthquake akin to the aftermath of the 1948 Nakba, potentially destabilizing US-backed autocrats and igniting new waves of resistance not just in the West Bank but across West Asia. The ongoing violence in the West Bank is not just another episode of this battle; it is a dangerous escalation that could reshape the geopolitical order of the region.

https://thecradle.co/articles/declaring ... ael-deeper

******

Hamas Accuses Israel of the Deaths of Prisoners

Image
Khalil Al-Hayya. Photo: X/ @iranmilitary_en

September 2, 2024 Hour: 9:58 am

The Hamas representative criticized Israeli PM Netanyahu’s preference for military aggression over dialogue.

Khalil Al-Hayya, a senior member of Hamas and head of its negotiation team, accused Israel of being responsible for the deaths of six Israeli prisoners in Gaza. He also pointed out that some of the deceased prisoners were victims of airstrikes and gunfire from Israeli forces.

In statements to the Qatari multimedia outlet Al-Jazeera, Al-Hayya asserted that these deaths could have been avoided through a prisoner exchange agreement, but the Israeli government’s insistence on carrying out military actions put their lives in danger.

“The last Israeli proposal was presented on May 27. It was submitted by the Israeli occupation and adopted word for word by U.S. President Joe Biden. The United States also took it to the Security Council, where it was adopted. Hamas welcomed the principles outlined by Biden and the Security Council’s decision. We were expecting an opportunity to reach an agreement. We agreed to talk,” said Al-Hayya.

The Hamas representative also criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s preference for military aggression over dialogue, mentioning that the Israeli government prioritized strategic objectives over the lives of the prisoners.

Al-Hayya stated that despite previous negotiations that led to the release of more than 115 Israelis and foreigners through Qatari mediation in November and December of 2023, Israel has rejected significant proposals for new prisoner exchanges. He argued that a genuine agreement could have saved lives on both sides, preventing an escalation in violence.


Al-Hayya mentioned the case of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, an American-Israeli prisoner whose family, supported by Qatari intermediaries, requested a video to confirm he was still alive. Hamas responded to this request and provided a video message, but shortly afterward, they lost contact with the prisoner due to an Israeli attack. Goldberg-Polin is among the deceased, which demonstrates Israel’s disregard for the lives involved.

The Hamas representative also criticized the role of the U.S. in the process, claiming that Washington has obstructed the negotiations, noting that despite indirect talks facilitated by intermediaries, the U.S. retracted its proposals. He also accused Israel of repeatedly changing its conditions, making it difficult to progress toward an agreement.

Nevertheless, Al-Hayya indicated that Hamas remains willing to negotiate a fair prisoner exchange, reducing the number of Palestinian prisoners demanded in exchange for Israeli soldiers and civilians. Unfortunately, however, Israel has not reciprocated.

Finally, he noted that the current negotiations have not shown significant progress, describing them as a stalling tactic. In this regard, he claimed that Israel is deliberately disrupting the process by introducing new conditions that do not align with previous agreements, a situation for which he called on the international community to pressure Tel Aviv to comply with the agreed terms.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/hamas-ac ... prisoners/

******

Image

The West Truly Doesn’t See Palestinians As Human

The message is clear: Israelis dying is a terrible tragedy, while Palestinians dying is just the normal way for things to be.

Caitlin Johnstone
September 2, 2024

You never see the dehumanization of Palestinians in western society exhibited so clearly as when something bad happens to Israelis during the genocidal assault on Gaza.

Today western officials are publicly weeping about six dead Israeli hostages, including one Israeli-American, who the IDF says were recently killed by Hamas.

Whoever’s been writing Joe Biden’s press releases for him published a statement about how “devastated and outraged” the president is about the death of the American hostage, Hersh Goldberg-Polin.

The statement says the president knows Goldberg-Polin’s parents, saying “I admire them and grieve with them more deeply than words can express” and that “Hamas leaders will pay for these crimes.”

“I have worked tirelessly to bring their beloved Hersh safely to them and am heartbroken by the news of his death,” the statement reads, which for the record is a lie — the Biden administration has been collaborating with Benjamin Netanyahu to sabotage a hostage deal at every turn.


Similar sentiments are being expressed in statements by western officials like Vice President Kamala Harris, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

All of these statements frame the deaths of these six Israeli hostages as an earth-shakingly horrific tragedy, and all frame Hamas as a band of evil villains who must be brought to justice for their crimes.

No similar statements have ever been made by any of these officials about the far, far greater number of innocent Palestinians who have been killed in Gaza by the state of Israel with their assistance. No similar expressions of condolence have ever been uttered by these leaders for the millions of Palestinians who’ve had their lives completely ruined by Israel’s atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank over the last eleven months, or for the untold thousands of parents who’ve had to bury children who were exterminated in Israel’s genocidal onslaught.

Western government officials are making it clear that they do not see Palestinians as human in the same way they see Israelis as human, as are the mass media propaganda institutions who’ve been covering the deaths of these hostages with an intensity never seen regarding the IDF’s daily massacres of civilians in Gaza. Israeli strikes killed 47 Palestinians in Gaza in one 24-hour period between Saturday and Sunday, receiving not the tiniest fraction of the attention as those six Israeli hostages.


The message is clear: Israelis dying is a terrible tragedy, while Palestinians dying is just the normal way for things to be. An Israeli dying should matter as much to you as your own family or friends dying, while a Palestinian dying should be regarded as a routine and natural event like a drop of rain falling from the sky.

And that’s an important message for westerners to be indoctrinated with. Can you imagine if we all started caring about western bombs being dropped in the middle east as much as we would care if they were being dropped on our own country, or on a country we’ve been conditioned to sympathize with? All their carefully manufactured consent would crumble, and people would cease allowing the western empire to do what it needs to do to dominate the planet.

These people are actively working to subvert our basic sense of human empathy. To twist our psyches into being unable to recognize the same level of humanity among empire-targeted populations as empire-supported ones. To see authorized populations as worthy of care and sympathy, and to see unauthorized populations as vermin in need of extermination.

Yes, our rulers really are that evil, and so are the propagandists who run the mass media.

So today I would like to extend my deepest condolences to the millions of Palestinians who’ve lost loved ones and had their lives thrown to the winds of chaos by Israel’s western-backed campaign of extermination, ethnic cleansing, and terrorism.

And I would like to remind my readers that Israel has exponentially more hostages than Hamas has, and murders them routinely, and rapes and tortures them constantly.

And it is right that we should care deeply about that. Even if the people who rule over us do not.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/09 ... -as-human/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Sep 04, 2024 11:33 am

Hamas rebuilds forces in northern Gaza, recruits 3,000 fighters: Report

As Israel moves to expand its war into the occupied West Bank, the Palestinian resistance in Gaza has continued to defy the odds nearly one year after 7 October

News Desk

SEP 3, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: Mohammed Salem/Reuters)

Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has “rebuilt its capabilities” in the northern Gaza Strip and has “recruited 3,000 new militants” nearly 11 months into Israel’s genocidal war, according to a security source who spoke with Channel 13 News on 2 September.


Channel 12 News has reported that, despite the colossal damage caused by the Israeli army in Gaza, “the latest information paints a worrying picture.”

“It is estimated that about 3,000 new fighters have been recruited into the movement, equipped with weapons and ammunition … This development raises great concern among security officials in Israel, as it indicates Hamas’ ability to recover, despite the severe damage it suffered at the beginning of the war,” the Hebrew news outlet cited security officials as saying.

Last month, a joint study by the Critical Threats Project (CTP) and the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) revealed that, after 10 months of war, the Israeli army managed to defeat only three out of a reported 24 battalions of Hamas’ Qassam Brigades.

“As of 1 July, only three of these 24 battalions were combat ineffective, meaning they were destroyed by the Israeli military,” CNN reported on 5 August, citing the study.

“If the Hamas battalions were largely destroyed [as Israel claims], Israeli forces wouldn’t still be fighting,” retired US Army Colonel Peter Mansoor told CNN.

Former Israeli army ombudsman Yitzhak Brik said in late June that the numbers of Palestinian fighters the army claimed to have killed are false and that Israeli forces are taking severe losses while rarely coming face to face with them.


In May, military sources told Hebrew daily Yedioth Ahronoth that Hamas will not be decisively defeated in Gaza until 2026 or 2027.

“We will not be in Gaza permanently. We’ll return for extensive raids deep into the territory to defeat a terror army built over 15 years … Meanwhile, the achievements of the forces that fought in Gaza are eroding, and there’s no conclusive political solution,” military sources revealed at the time.

https://thecradle.co/articles/hamas-reb ... ers-report

Israeli army hit by sudden resignation of ground forces chief

The latest resignation coincides with concerns over a potential redeployment of Israeli forces in north Gaza, where Hebrew media says Hamas has recruited thousands of new fighters and rebuilt its capabilities

News Desk

SEP 3, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Yossi Zeliger/Flash90)

Major General Tamir Yadai, the commander of the Israeli army’s ground forces, has decided to resign for “personal reasons,” Hebrew news site Walla reported on 3 September.

Yadai “will resign from his position for personal reasons,” representing “an earthquake in the General Staff,” Walla reported, adding that the move comes after he was being prepared “as a candidate to be the next deputy chief of staff."

Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi was informed that Yadai “intends to resign in the coming weeks once a replacement officer is found.” The report adds that Halevi and Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant have agreed to the request.

It is not immediately clear who will replace Yadai as commander of the Israeli military’s ground troops.

“Yadai’s decision may stem from his assessment that he will not be appointed Deputy Chief of Staff,” and assessments indicate that the current Deputy Chief of Staff, Major General Amir Baram, “will not end his position soon,” Walla said.

It added that Halevi “does not intend to recommend him for the position of his next deputy.”

Walla wrote that the resignation comes as the army is on “high alert” given the war and its potential expansion, complications over prisoner exchange negotiations, and “other expected changes” within the General Staff.

It said the situation “would oblige the chief of staff to appoint a new commander of the ground forces, and increase the chances of Major General Uri Gordin, commander of the Northern Command, to serve as the next deputy.”

Yet Gordin has “has been criticized for his recent conduct as commander of the Northern Command in the context of the fight against Hezbollah.” The Lebanese resistance group has forced tens of thousands of settlers out of Israel’s north due to its operations in support of Gaza, which began on 8 October.

Yadai has served three major roles in the army: commander of the home front command, commander of the central command, and commander of the ground force.

His decision to finish his role as ground forces commander comes after a recent wave of resignations within the Israeli military and security establishments.

Walla reported two days ago that the commander of Israel’s Unit 8200, Brigadier General Yossi Shariel, plans to announce his resignation in weeks to come.

Just a little over one week ago, Hezbollah targeted Unit 8200’s main headquarters in the Glilot base six miles north of Tel Aviv. The operation was in retaliation to the Israeli assassination of Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in late July, an attack which also killed several civilians, including young children.

In April, Aharon Haliva, head of the military intelligence directorate, resigned over his failure to prevent Operation Al-Aqsa Flood.

Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar has also reportedly expressed an intention to resign for the same reason once the war ends.

The commander of the ground troops’ resignation also comes as Hebrew media reported that Hamas has significantly rebuilt its capabilities in the north of Gaza and has recruited thousands of new fighters.


As a result, security officials believe there “will be no escape from a renewed and massive entry of IDF forces into northern Gaza.”

Israel has failed to root out resistance factions from north Gaza. In January, the army said Hamas had been dismantled and cleared out of the northern Gaza Strip.

Months later, Israeli troops took heavy losses in successive battles in several areas of the north, including the Jabalia camp and the Shujaiya and Zaytoun neighborhoods.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-a ... rces-chief

Tulkarem resistance inflicts casualties on invading Israeli forces

At least 34 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank since the start of Israel’s brutal operation in the territory last week

News Desk

SEP 3, 2024

Image
Fighters from the Tulkarem Brigade of the PIJ's Quds Brigades, including its commander the late Abu Shujaa (on the right). 2 May, 2024. (Photo credit: Reuters)

Palestinian resistance fighters inflicted a number of casualties on Israeli forces on 3 September during fierce clashes in the occupied West Bank city of Tulkarem, one of the major focuses of Israel’s massive operation in the territory.

Israeli forces are pushing back into the city and its refugee camp following a brief withdrawal after the assassination of Abu Shujaa, the commander of the Tulkarem Brigade of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement’s Quds Brigades.

“Our fighters are engaging in fierce clashes with the occupation forces in the Balawneh axis from zero distance, achieving direct hits. Our fight continues and our weapons are drawn in all arenas,” the Tulkarem Brigade said in a statement on Tuesday afternoon.

The Tulkarem Brigade said earlier on 3 September that its fighters “detonated a highly explosive device, that had been prepared in advance near a gathering of military vehicles, in the Balawneh axis of Tulkarem camp, achieving confirmed injuries.”

The group had said on Tuesday morning that it was engaged in “fierce clashes” with Israeli troops in Tulkarem camp and that its fighters were “showering the infantry forces in the camp's alleys with heavy volleys of bullets, achieving direct hits.”

Eyewitnesses cited by the West Bank-based Palestinian journalist, Azzam Abu al-Adas, said two bodies arrived at the Israeli Tel Hashomer Hospital and that it is “likely” that they were soldiers killed in the clashes in Tulkarem.


The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades also took part in the fierce clashes on Tuesday.


Two Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces in the Danaba suburb east of Tulkarem on Tuesday. The two young men, who have yet to be identified, were besieged in a home surrounded by Israeli troops, who fired anti-tank missiles at the house, WAFA news agency reported.

A 15-year-old boy, who was on his way to a mosque in Tulkarem with his father, was also shot and killed by Israeli forces. The boy’s father was taken to a hospital.

In the city of Jenin, where Israel’s “Camps of Summer” operation has been heavily focused, Israeli troops shot and killed a 16-year-old girl in the village of Kafr Dan near Jenin.

Israeli forces also targeted a group of journalists in Kafr Dan as they were covering Israel’s attacks on the area, injuring two of them.

The death toll from Israel’s brutal operation in the West Bank has risen to at least 34. The toll includes 19 in Jenin, eight in Tulkarem, four in Tubas, and three in Hebron. In total, 685 Palestinians have been killed in the West Bank since 7 October.

Israel launched its current West Bank operation on 28 August. The operation is the largest of its kind since the Second Intifada.

Security officials told Israel Hayom newspaper on 3 September that the Israeli army has internally classified the occupied West Bank as “the second most critical front, immediately after Gaza.”

“The Jenin operation is just the beginning,” security officials told the Israeli daily, adding that ongoing raids in the northern West Bank are “set to continue in the foreseeable future.”

“The IDF aims to reach October, the month of major Jewish holidays, with a calmer West Bank than the current mini-uprising unfolding on the ground. While a full-scale war across extensive areas is unlikely, Operation ’Summer Camps’ is expected to expand to other West Bank regions soon,” it added.

https://thecradle.co/articles/tulkarem- ... aeli-force

Sanaa, Riyadh refute US claims of Yemeni attack on Saudi tanker

Yemen accused Washington of ‘spreading false information,’ while the firm that owns the Saudi tanker ‘unequivocally’ affirmed that the ship was not struck

News Desk

SEP 4, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: X)

Yemen’s Ansarallah resistance movement has denied targeting a Saudi oil tanker in the Red Sea, as claimed by Washington earlier this week.

Ansarallah said in a statement on 4 September that it “did not attack a Saudi oil tanker in the Red Sea,” calling the statement released by US CENTCOM “false.”

A member of Ansarallah’s Supreme Political Council, Mohammad Ali al-Houthi, said via social media on 3 September that the US is “shedding crocodile tears and spreading false information,” noting “the failure of the American mission” against Yemen.

“In supporting the terrorism of the temporary [Israeli] entity, [the US] has lost its mind and has begun to make mistakes in its media statements, just as it has made mistakes in its military assessments,” Houthi said.


“The solution is to stop the aggression on Gaza, not to adopt the buffoonery of incorrect information that indicates another failure,” he added.

The Saudi shipping firm Bahri, which operates the Amjad tanker that Washington said was hit, also denied there was an attack.

“We unequivocally affirm that Amjad was not targeted and sustained no injuries or damage. The vessel remains fully operational and is proceeding to her planned destination without interruption,” the company said on 3 September.

CENTCOM claimed that Ansarallah struck the Saudi oil tanker in a statement released early on 3 September.


“On the morning of Sep. 2, the Iranian-backed Houthis attacked two crude oil tankers, the Panama flagged/owned, Greek operated MV BLUE LAGOON I and the Saudi flagged, owned, and operated MV AMJAD, with two ballistic missiles and a one-way attack uncrewed aerial system, hitting both vessels,”

The Yemeni Armed Forces, which is merged with Ansarallah, claimed responsibility for the attack on the Blue Lagoon ship on 2 September but made no mention of the Amjad tanker.

“The Yemeni Armed Forces carried out an effective military operation targeting the ship (BLUE LAGOON I) in the Red Sea, with a number of appropriate missiles and a number of drones, and it was directly hit, thanks be to God. The ship was targeted after the company that owns it violated the decision to ban entry into the ports of occupied Palestine,” the Yemeni army said.

Ansarallah and Yemen’s Sanaa government have, for nearly a decade, been at war with a Saudi-led coalition made up mainly of Arab states.

Over the past two years, Sanaa and Riyadh have made significant progress in peace negotiations to end the conflict in Yemen. However, several factors have complicated the peace talks, including the Emirati presence in the country and US involvement in the war.

According to several reports over the past year, Washington has attempted to obstruct Saudi-Yemeni peace efforts and deepen the ridge between Riyadh and Sanaa.

Ansarallah leader Abdel Malik al-Houthi warned Saudi Arabia not to succumb to US pressure in July.

“The US sent us messages that it would push the Saudi regime to take aggressive steps [against us], and there were American visits to Saudi Arabia for that reason,” Houthi said at the time.

“The American wants to involve Saudi Arabia in a comprehensive war, meaning that the situation with us [and Saudi Arabia] will return to what it was at the height of the escalation … The Americans are trying to entangle you [Saudi Arabia],” he added. “If you want good for yourselves and stability for your country and economy, stop your conspiracies against our country.”

Sanaa’s forces have, since November last year, been attacking ships linked to Israel or bound for Israeli ports in support of Gaza, vowing not to stop until the war on the strip is ended. After the start of a US–UK campaign against Yemen to protect Israeli interests, Ansarallah and the Yemeni army began targeting US warships.

Last month, Yemen attacked the Greek-owned Sounion tanker in the Red Sea. After its crew was evacuated by a French warship, Yemeni troops stormed the vessel and rigged it with explosives.

https://thecradle.co/articles/sanaa-riy ... udi-tanker

Wave of resignations continues in Israel as police intel chief steps down

The commander of Israel’s ground forces and the head of the army’s Unit 8200 are also set to resign, Hebrew media reported this week

News Desk

SEP 4, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Israel Police)

The chief of Israel’s police intelligence division plans to resign, Israeli media reported on 4 September.

This comes amidst a recent wave of resignations in the Israeli military and security establishment.

“Dep. Ch. Dror Assaraf, head of the police intelligence division, announced to [newly appointed] Police Commissioner Daniel Levi on Wednesday, his intention to step down from his role,” the Jerusalem Post said.

According to Hebrew newspaper Maariv, Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir – who is in charge of the prison system and police – has been blocking the promotion of several officers, including Assaraf. Israeli media reported earlier this year that Israel’s High Court has shown great concern over a law passed in December 2022 which granted Ben Gvir broader power over the police system.

The same Maariv report, released on 4 September, said that the appointment of every new police commissioner is accompanied by a wave of resignations. It adds that some realize they may not get promoted and decide to resign, while others are notified that they should retire.

Assaraf is the fourth to resign from his post in recent days.

Major General Tamir Yadai, the commander of the Israeli army’s ground forces, decided to resign for “personal reasons,” Hebrew news site Walla reported on 3 September.

Walla also recently reported that the commander of Israel’s Unit 8200, Brigadier General Yossi Shariel, plans to announce his resignation in weeks to come. Unit 8200 is the same unit whose headquarters was targeted by Hezbollah as part of its retaliatory attack in late August.

Ynet reported that the intelligence chief of the army’s Gaza Division also plans to leave his post.

In April, Aharon Haliva, head of the military intelligence directorate, resigned over his failure to prevent Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October.

Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar has also reportedly expressed an intention to resign for the same reason once the war ends.

Israeli journalist Yossi Yehoshua wrote for the Ynet news outlet on 4 September that Israeli army Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi has also “taken responsibility [for 7 October] and is also expected to resign in due course. Perhaps this will really happen in the coming months.”

“Instead of vacating his chair, apologizing deeply and conducting a comprehensive soul-searching, he barricades himself in his office, does not present investigations transparently and above all continues to make appointments, as if he has the legitimacy to shape the face of the army for years to come,” Yehoshua added.

The resignations come at a critical moment, as Israel is at war on several fronts, including a recent escalation of operations in the occupied West Bank.

https://thecradle.co/articles/wave-of-r ... steps-down

******

Palestinian Gaza and the West Bank: Overt and Covert CleansOcide
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 2, 2024
Makram Khoury-Machool

Image

The tactics (crimes) of CleansOcide, which have been implemented since October 2023 in the Gaza Strip are now being implemented in the West Bank on a higher scale. The plans for Palestine’s disintegration began decades ago. The Netanyahu government did not develop anything new in the West Bank, but simply implemented what was long ago known as the Allon Plan.

It is true that Cleansocidal Netanyahu escalated his aggression on the West Bank in late August and early September 2024 in terms of the pace of crimes, scale of brutality, and bloody killing. However, why has this triggered a media uproar? After all, the Israeli Occupation has neither stopped plundering the land and establishing settlements, nor has the occupied Palestinian West Bank ever been calm in particular over the last 25 years, let alone since its occupation in 1967 or during the first Palestinian intifada which broke out back in December 1987.

The crime of CleansOcide (Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing) which Netanyahu and his criminals have been perpetrating in the besieged Gaza Strip since October 2023 was made possible after the return of extreme right-winger Benjamin Netanyahu to the premiership of the Israeli occupation government on December 29, 2022, armed with “Zionist-religious” fascist forces, making it doubly important to evaluate once again his original scheme known as “Annexation”, which he was expected to announce in early July 2020 when he was prime minister and his ally Trump was in power in the White House, but temporarily retracted its announcement.

It is true that the practices of the Bennett-Lapid government were racist and practiced the most heinous forms of oppression and killing against the Palestinians in Eastern Palestine occupied in 1967, and that Netanyahu is on the extreme right… However, Netanyahu’s fusion with what is on the right of the extreme right offers us endless degrees of the curve of fascism.

Although war criminal Ariel Sharon, until the second Palestinian intifada (which erupted on 28 September 2000) and the siege of Yasser Arafat (2002-2004) and his consequential killing, was a symbol of the massacres and destructions perpetrated against the Palestinian people, what Netanyahu did since he took over the occupation government back in mid-1996 (with the exception of one period until the advent of Ehud Barak for a period briefly negotiating with Arafat at Camp David 2, and then Sharon’s advent until he fell into a coma and Ehud Olmert’s assumption of power until his dismissal and Netanyahu’s return to power after a decade in 2009 until 2021) exceeds all that the leaders of the Israeli occupation did, regardless of their different political parties.

Even though Netanyahu did not invent a new fascist product (i.e.) settler colonialism, he overshadowed it with blatant fascism that might, between shock and awakening, seize all of Palestine in a project that began with the publication of Herzl’s “State of the Jews”, passing through the Balfour declaration, the decision to partition Palestine in 1947, the culmination of the Nakba until 1949, the setback of the occupation of the second/eastern part of Palestine, the Oslo treaties, and even Trump’s project called the “deal of the century” and the “annexation” project. What this essay doesn’t do is deal with possible Palestinian reactions to the additional steps that will be taken by Netanyahu.

Indeed, the ‘Deal of the Century’ document deals several times, especially on pages 8, 12, 13, and 14, with these points, as it turns evasive and is linked to several impossible conditions that have proven in the last quarter century to have been placed within the framework of providing a certificate of ‘good conduct’, but it is nothing but a deception in order to loot more land. It reads, “Palestinian leaders must embrace peace by recognizing Israel as a Jewish state, rejecting terrorism in all its forms, allowing special arrangements that address the vital security needs of Israel and the region, building effective institutions and choosing pragmatic solutions. If these steps are taken and the criteria set forth in this vision are met, the United States will support the establishment of a Palestinian state.” (“Deal of the Century” document – p. 8).

Cross-party looting: ‘The 1967 Allon Plan’

The “Deal of the Century” is only a clear reading that the document paves the way for Netanyahu to try to do whatever he wants in Palestine. It is true that in order to serve Netanyahu and Trump, all existing plans must be put in a blender and repackaged for the purpose of political marketing. However, ideological thinking about the “entitlement of the Jewish people,” which was “invented,” as stated for example in former minister Shaked’s document (which uses religious symbols even though it is secular), did not need new innovations. The various political proposals to extend the Zionist occupation’s control over the largest percentage of the lands of Palestine, including natural resources, and with the least material losses, go back directly as a “modern” Zionist capitalist “secular” scheme to less than a month after the Naksa (Setback) of 1967 and not necessarily to the arrival of the fascist settler extreme Right to power.

The “patent” for the marginalisation of the Palestinian people and the destruction of their homeland belongs to Yigal Allon, the secular Labour figure who held the position of minister of labour during the occupation of the eastern/second part of Palestine in 1967, and a figure with a military background, as he headed the terrorist organisation “The Palmach” (1941) during the Nakba, which joined the organisations ‘Etzel’ (1931) and ‘Lehi’ (1940) to escalate terrorism against the Mandate government and the Palestinians during the period of preparation for the onslaught on Palestine.

In a cabinet session on June 19, 1967, Allon acknowledged that foreign policy should be as dynamic as military plans, and suggested the annexation of al-Khalil [Hebron] (south of al-Quds [Jerusalem] and Beit Lahm) in order to ensure control of occupied al-Quds. However, he returned and formally presented to his government on July 13, 1967, under what was titled “The Allon Plan”.

Image
Image Source: Obstacles to Peace

The “Allon Plan” that Allon presented to the Labour government (Prime Minister Levi Eshkol and Security Minister Moshe Dayan) is based on the colonialist ideology that believes in the absolute right of the Jews to Palestine and in the application of security and economic control. This is based on three points:

The application of the Torah doctrine of a Jewish right to Palestine
Drawing security borders on Palestinian lands between the Occupation and Jordan
Finding a method (settlement and the extension of military control to rob resources) to ensure a Jewish majority for the so-called “democratic Jewish state,” and for this, it is possible to give some Palestinians a formula to manage their limited affairs only in regard to service issues
The “Allon Plan” also suggested seizing most of the Jordan Valley, returning what they do not need to Jordan, and establishing a border between them, i.e. losing the external borders of any future Palestinian entity and controlling a third of the occupied West Bank as well. Although Allon’s proposal was not officially adopted by the government, the spirit of the plan was followed, and sometimes Allon’s decisions personally, as a minister, encouraged colonisation on the land since the end of the 1960s. And on this basis, ‘Ma’aleh Adumim’ (currently 40,000 settlers) was established as one of the largest colonies east of al-Quds.

The Allon scheme was described as a “compromise” by the Zionist occupation between those who wanted to “return the occupied territories” and those who wanted to hold onto them and establish settlements in them. Yoram Cohen, the former head of the Shin Bet, had no preoccupation with the monotony of repeating the same plan and not being innovative. What he has done recently is a “modified mixture” that takes into account some changes on the ground.

The Control of the Jordan Valley

When Allon presented the idea of his plan for the Jordan Valley to the government immediately after the 1967 Naksa, the Occupation government kept the matter a secret at first, and the motives for this secrecy were not disclosed. The subject of the Jordan Valley was of great expansive importance to Yigal Allon. In order to control its natural resources, the occupation would need to secure its stolen goods by planting “guards” as colonists. Understanding the importance of the Jordan Valley indicates that the occupation is not ‘static’, but rather is a series of systematic penetrations and violations that are embodied by changing and renewable operations. When the ambitions in the imagination and plans for the lands of Palestine are under constant renewal, the gradual takeover of these lands is a daily process that is confronted by the indigenous citizens with their stubborn struggle and whatever tools they can muster. The Occupation adopted the method of attrition to steal the land inch by inch, and this is what happened and is happening in every part of Palestine in general, but in the eastern part occupied in 1967 in particular, and in this context, the time for of finishing off the Jordan Valley has come.

The Jordan Valley, or the “Ghors” (al-Aghwar), is the border between Jordan and Palestine, making it the eastern and outer border, as it extends from Safad in the north to the Negev in the south. The total area of the Jordan Valley exceeds 700,000 dunums [about 900 square meters], and its breadth (at different points) ranges from 15 to 30 km from the Jordan River. It is home to nearly 70,000 Palestinian citizens in 27 permanent gatherings on an area of 10,000 dunums, and dozens of pastoral and Bedouin gatherings. The area of arable land in the Jordan Valley is 280,000 dunums, i.e. 38.8% of the total area of the Jordan Valley; Palestinians use 50,000 dunums of it. Meanwhile, colonists from the Jordan Valley used 27,000 dunums of agricultural land. The Occupation controls 400,000 dunums under the pretext of using them as closed military areas or 55.5% of the total area of the Jordan Valley. The Palestinian residents are prohibited from practicing any agricultural, urban, or any other activity in these areas. The Occupation has established 90 military outposts in the Jordan Valley since its invasion in 1967. Control exists, therefore, but not legally, and the looting project aims to legitimise the Occupation’s control.

The Jordan Valley areas are divided into: Areas A, which are under the control of the Palestinian National Authority, with an area of 85 square km, and 7.4% of the total area of the Jordan Valley; Areas B, which are a joint sharing area between the Palestinian Authority and the Occupation, with an area of 50 square km, and represents 4.3% of the total area of the Jordan Valley; and Area C, which is under full Israeli control, with an area of 1,155 square kilometres, and constitutes the largest area of the Jordan Valley (by 88.3%). Since the invasion in 1967, and despite the signing of the Oslo Accords more than a quarter of a century ago, the Occupation has not stopped its daily violations. Behind the propaganda is a process of expansion and looting to deplete the natural resources located in the Jordan Valley and deprive the Palestinians of them.

On the lands of the Palestinian Jordan Valley lie 36 settlements, the majority of which are agricultural. They were built on the theft of one thousand dunums, in addition to the looting of 60,000 dunums. Most of the colonies in the Jordan Valley belong to the regional settlement councils known as Arvot Ha-yarden and Mejilot. These daily violations cause profound changes on the demographic, geographical, military, and political map of the Jordan Valley. This takes away the Palestinian right to establish agricultural projects in the first place.

In order to remove the “humanitarian obstacle,” the Occupation has displaced more than 50,000 residents of the Jordan Valley since its occupation in 1967, in addition to entire population centres, under the pretext of their residence in military areas, such as the displacement of the people of Khirbet al-Hadidiya in the northern Jordan Valley.

Before the displacement comes the demolition. Therefore, the Palestinian Valley witnesses continuous and repeated demolitions by the Occupation authorities of Palestinian communities, in whole and in part, as in the Al-Ras Al-Ahmar and Atouf and Khirb Al-Farsieh villages, with the aim of evicting and displacing citizens to facilitate the looting of the Jordan Valley lands after their ethnic cleansing. According to B’Tselem data, between 2006 and September 2017, the Occupation demolished at least 700 housing units in Palestinian towns in the Jordan Valley, in addition to the frequent evictions of many residential communities under the pretext of military exercises and the accompanying demolitions and confiscation of the property of Palestinian citizens.

The situation was further inflamed by the establishment of the “Hamra” and “Tayseer” checkpoints at the entrances to the Jordan Valley, with the aim of using them in the closure policy that they took to implement, to prevent Jordan Valley products from reaching the Palestinian markets. The Occupation forces also completely separated the Jordan Valley from the rest of the occupied West Bank during the second Palestinian Intifada, which began at the end of September 2000, in order to obstruct the arrival of Palestinian farmers and workers.

Therefore, the “Summer Camps” assault by the Israeli Occupation on the West Bank in late summer 2024 shouldn’t be seen as a pure “military operation”, but rather as a tactic to achieve the goals of the broader strategy to attempt to control the whole of Palestine.

To this, we must add the criminal Separation Wall and hundreds of checkpoints, the economic siege, continuous land grabbing, and the establishment of colonies in an area (West Bank) that is 20 times larger than the Gaza Strip, led us to a conclusion that the crimes of the Israeli Occupation to control the geography and torture/evict the demography have never stopped since 1948 and 1967. The tactics (crimes) of CleansOcide, which have been implemented since October 2023 in the Gaza Strip are now being implemented in the West Bank on a higher scale, though the Israeli Occupation has killed around a thousand Palestinians in the West Bank since October 2023.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... eansocide/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Sep 05, 2024 11:20 am

A Resistance View of the Long War
September 3, 2024

Image
Yahya Sinwar in his destroyed home in 2021. Photo: The Anti Empire Project/File photo.

By The Anti Empire Project – Ago 30, 2024

A review of Yahya Sinwar’s novel, The Thorn and the Carnation

At the end of the 2021 war, a Hamas leader gave a speech among the carnage of Gaza. He told the press and public that he would walk home, that the Israelis knew where he was, and if they wanted to make him a martyr that would be their chance. Instead, he ended up going home and sitting on an intact piece of upholstery amid the rubble of his house.

Today that leader – until 2011 a prisoner of Israel’s, now the head of Hamas’s political bureau – is in the tunnels of Gaza, directing the war effort against Israel’s genocidal army.

Two decades ago, Yahya Sinwar wrote a novel. It should be required reading for friends and enemies of Palestinians alike, but it was banned from Amazon and circulates instead on the back channels of the web. The Thorn and the Carnation was written inside Israeli prison, copied by hand and smuggled out: Sinwar’s words escaped Israel’s dungeons years before the author got out in a prisoner exchange. The novel is a document of Palestinian life under occupation from the 1960s to the early 2000s and reveals the perspectives and priorities of one of the main Resistance leaders of our time.

Image

Colonizers are always obsessed with the leaders among the oppressed, and Sinwar obsesses the Israelis like no one else at the moment.

Image
Israel’s UN ambassador holding up a photo of Sinwar

Image
Israel’s Finance Minister holds up a photo of Sinwar

Image
Israeli made terrorist playing card of Sinwar

In the preface of the book, Sinwar says that all the events in the book are real but have only been transformed into fiction to “to fulfill the form and requirements of a novelistic work.” As a graduate of the Arabic Literature program of the (now destroyed, along with every other university building in Gaza) Islamic University of Gaza, Sinwar would know. Imprisoned not long after his student years (he was born in 1962 and imprisoned in 1988, sentenced to life), Sinwar wrote a book where most action takes place in the three sites central to an occupied people obsessed with education: the camps, the campuses, and the prisons. There are no corporate boardrooms, glitzy hotels, yachts, or even weapons laboratories. Readers of the Thorn and the Carnation witness the construction of the Resistance in seemingly impossible conditions, humble locations, under the ever-watchful eye of the occupier.

Morally and practically prescriptive, the novel is not written from an ironic distance, but from the point of view of a youth growing up and learning of the world. Corrupted characters and villains – the occupation and collaborators – play their roles across from upright Resistance characters and heroes. The protagonists’ family hold fully-drawn out debates between communist (Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine), Islamist (Hamas), and nationalist (Fatah) members. All positions are reasonably portrayed, but the Hamsawis get the last word.

A review of the book by Haneen Odetallah in Mondoweiss draws the philosophy of Sinwar out of the text, showing how the protagonist’s cousin (more like a brother), Ibrahim, represents the values of a Resistance fighter: Self-sacrifice, asceticism, and security awareness.

Certain military concepts can also be drawn out by reading Thorn and Carnation. In it, a frank and undramatic narration of Israeli atrocities coexist alongside an ever-evolving assessment of Resistance possibilities.

Long before the current genocide, Israel’s actions could have formed the basis of a horror novel, but the Thorn and the Carnation is a novel of action. While occupation persists, resistance never stops, and never will. Its forms change, but through all the harms inflicted upon the people, it grows. Even if Sinwar himself were killed in the current war, the Resistance would go on.

The book describes a Gaza Strip in the 1960s constantly under patrol by the Israeli army, in which guerrilla fighters would move in silence and come out of hiding for an ambush. “The resistance men would dominate the camp at night, making it impossible for the occupation patrols to enter its alleys. They stayed on the main streets, and with the break of dawn, the resistance men would disappear.”

The actions and the deaths of martyrs are reported in a straightforward style:

“A significant event that year was the martyrdom of our neighbor Abu Yousuf. He, along with two other young men, had set out to execute a mission against the occupation patrols. Their strategy involved one of the fighters throwing a grenade at the patrol that regularly passed through the main street at a specific time, then retreating in a way that made him visible to the soldiers. Abu Yousuf and another fighter, armed with Carl Gustav rifles and grenades, lay in wait for the reinforcements that would pursue the first attacker. Unfortunately, they were ambushed unexpectedly from behind, and both Abu Yousuf and his comrade Ibrahim were martyred on the spot.”

As a child, the protagonist, Ahmed, witnesses the public execution of a collaborator, followed by an Israeli mass arrest operation; imprisonment and torture of random men from the community. Characters are introduced to show how Resistance is organized: recruiting, building networks, acquiring weapons. Resistance members, like everyone else, get swept up in the Israeli dragnet, and the novel reveals how they conduct the struggle even while being interrogated:

“As is usual in resistance work, one of the cells encountered an operational failure, leading to the arrest of its members. Under severe interrogation, some began confessing, leading to more arrests, eventually reaching Abu Ali. He was captured and subjected to intense interrogation in the dungeons of Hebron prison. Abu Ali showed great resilience and refused to confess even the simplest things that some of the young men, deceived during the interrogation, had admitted.” His partner had confessed, but the uncle didn’t: “Abdul Fattah was taken to Hebron prison and subjected to severe interrogation and torture, as they questioned him about his relationship with Abu Ali and tried to convince him that Abu Ali had confessed everything. However, Abdul Fattah continued to deny the allegations. Consequently, he was sentenced to six months of administrative detention without any charges, while Abu Ali received a five-year sentence based on the confessions obtained from some of the young men who weren’t resilient enough to withstand the interrogation ordeal.”

The ones who don’t confess to anything end up free sooner, while confessions lead to worse sentences for everyone. The message is clear.

Image
Sinwar as a young man

The chapters covering the 1970s dive deeply into prison life – the counts, loudspeakers, food, bathroom shifts, beatings, being made to sit on a blanket non stop, one five minute shower per week, one bar of soap for dozens of people… then the military court / kangaroo court. A young reader of the novel would know what to expect when the Israelis nabbed him and sent him to prison. This part of the novel conveys the centrality of the prisoners’ struggle to Palestine, and the importance of liberating the prisoners to the Resistance. After the prisoners adopt the hunger strike, the Israelis make conditions a bit better and the prison becomes a Resistance school in its own right:

“In the following period, cultural, religious, and educational gatherings in prison became very common. In one room, there was a session discussing Palestinian history; in another, a political session about the latest developments; in a third, a session about the principles, slogans, and objectives of the Fatah movement; and in a fourth, a session on socialist thought and Marxist philosophy. The prison transformed into an advanced school where learners taught others, and those inexperienced in debate and political thought were trained.”

As the chronology moves into the 1980s, the protagonist’s older cousin, Ibrahim, the model Resistance fighter, comes into his own. He studies and prepares, builds a family life and a business while getting an education and working underground in the Resistance.

Image

Before the First Intifada (1987-1989) the Resistance is at a low point and Israeli intelligence looks unbeatable:

“The occupation’s intelligence had begun to infiltrate the camp gradually, systematically, and deliberately. Anyone opposing or objecting would find the intelligence officer responsible for the area sending dozens of summonses to young men and men to his office. They would sit in the waiting room for hours, then be called in one by one, to be beaten, threatened, warned, bargained with, consoled, and efforts made to recruit them.”

How did the Israelis recruit? Through blackmail, bribery, corruption, and, from the Islamic perspective, through immorality as well:

“It became clear that through its agents, the occupation’s intelligence started promoting the trade and use of hashish, drugs, and alcohol. They considered this a means to destroy the nation and kill any spirit of resistance, while the agents saw it as a quick way to make money with their appearance protected. The agents began to promote corruption and immorality by spreading obscene pictures, magazines, and sexual videotapes among boys and girls.”

A reader of the book would be forewarned against these Israeli methods:

“It was clear that the occupation’s intelligence, using its agents, systematically practiced spreading organized corruption to destroy the people and end any hope of a future for liberation or resistance. Every day, their methods in this field evolved, to the extent that one of the well-known agents’ offices would announce registration for a tourist trip to areas inside the Green Line. During these trips, with dozens of naive young men, several prostitutes known for their collaboration with the occupation’s intelligence were taken along.”

But despite all the infiltration and Israeli intelligence success, resistance persists. The Intifada indeed begins. In the Thorn and the Carnation, there is no separation between the armed struggle, the intelligence war, and the popular struggles on campuses or in the streets. The Israelis do not differentiate between these and neither does the Resistance. In the latter half of the novel, there is a switch to third-person narration as details of how organization proceeds and what methods are employed by both occupation and Resistance, e.g.:

“…the territories were completely devoid of weapons; the occupation had methodically worked over nearly two and a half decades of its occupation of Gaza and the West Bank to empty the regions of weapons and ammunition and to seal all avenues through which they might be brought, imposing severe penalties on anyone involved in this trade. People didn’t even know how to use weapons if they found them. Therefore, activists resorted to using bladed weapons like knives, daggers, machetes, and swords, in addition to batons, and it was very rare to see an old Carlo Gustav rifle or a pistol.“

On organizing the Intifada:

“They are planning and organizing the escalation of the Intifada and confrontations in the city and surrounding towns and villages. They agree to work on two fronts: first, to activate the events and incidents wing of the Intifada, and second, to start establishing armed groups and cells and to gather weapons for them.

“One of the attendees departs to meet three young men to announce the formation of the core of the armed effort. They are instructed to start searching for weapons, prepare hideouts and shelters, and nominate candidates ready to engage in this field. Meanwhile, dozens of activists move in various directions to mobilize individuals and supporters to distribute pamphlets, write slogans on walls, and set up barricades on roads to hinder the movement of occupation forces and settlers, drawing them into suitable locations for stone-throwing, thus facilitating the youths’ camouflage, withdrawal, and maneuvering.”

When the Intifada winds down and Fatah signs the Oslo Accords with Israel, the debate between Hamas and Fatah on the peace process takes place in the protagonists’ family home, between Ahmed’s brother, Mahmoud, who is with Fatah, and his cousin Ibrahim, with Hamas. When Mahmoud says that the Palestinians needed an agreement to establish the beginnings of a state in the West Bank and Gaza, Ibrahim replies:

“It’s clear that continuing resistance and military activities, which cause human losses to the occupation, along with a popular uprising that inflicts political and media damage, will force them to withdraw from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Then we can establish a state on any piece of land from which the enemy withdraws… If they leave by an agreement, it means that we Palestinians must adhere to certain obligations, the least of which is recognizing their right to our remaining land. However, if they leave without an agreement under the pressure of resistance, it means that we have committed to nothing and the door remains open for us to continue immediately or later… when we find it appropriate.”

As the Intifada dissolves into the Oslo Accords, Ibrahim he gives a speech in prison, to his fellow prisoners, about how the Resistance would start over and over again, as many times as necessary:

“…All sacrifices of the first Intifada have been wasted, and now, with the politicians and negotiators, we’ve reached a deadlock. What’s stopping us from starting anew?”

“Hundreds, if not thousands, of martyrs will fall, and tens of thousands will be wounded. You’ll find someone to propose going to a new Oslo, or whatever you want to call it. After every round of our people’s struggle and sacrifice, the politicians come to reap the fruits; because they rush to harvest the fruit before its time, they are punished by being deprived of it. Neither does the fruit stay on the tree to ripen, nor is it useful when harvested because it’s not yet ripe. This was the solution with our people’s first Intifada, and now we must start again until someone imagines that the fruit has ripened and its time has come, only to destroy everything our people have sacrificed for.”

In Ibrahim’s view, the pressure of Resistance alone is what led to the partial withdrawal of Israel from the occupied territories, and the easing of that pressure that led to the reoccupation.

The novel goes through the 1990s in a whirlwind of Israeli repression and Resistance operations. In the end, Israel is at a crossroads, unable to decide how to proceed, as Resistance continues to grow.

In Mahmoud’s (Fatah) view, continuing Resistance after the agreement was endangering the Palestinians, who had no way of defeating Israel. Ibrahim addresses this defeatism directly, as Mahmoud says the Israelis could easily crush the Palestinians.

“Then why haven’t they crushed us? The components of the equation are not merely about pure military strength, Mahmoud. Israel knows it faces an Arab and Islamic nation behind us, fragmented yes, but if it used excessive force against us, the balances of the universe would turn. Israel is unable to crush us because it is governed by many equations, and breaking any one of them means it could be crushed as well.”

Ibrahim’s journey ends in martyrdom, from a helicopter-launched missile striking his car. That, too, is symbolic of the way, in the world view of the Thorn and Carnation, a model Resistance fighter’s life should end while occupation persists.

In the end, the great characters in the Thorn and the Carnation exhibit persistence – through pain, grief, prison, and torture. They don’t reveal themselves to the enemy. They are not fooled by the enemy’s deception and are not intimidated by the enemy’s violence. They study and learn and prepare, even as they fight. They will fight on regardless of setbacks and even through genocide.


At a public event Sinwar is presented with a sidearm captured from an Israeli soldier.
The narrative of the novel ends in 2004. Two decades later, Israel is one year into a genocide against the Palestinians, with the full support of all Western countries, led by the US. The leader of the genocidal campaign is Benjamin Netanyahu. The leader of the principal Palestinian Resistance organization is Yahya Sinwar.

At the moment, Israel, governed as Ibrahim says “by many equations”, is trying to break them, all to try to crush the Resistance. Increasingly it seems that by the end of this war, the Resistance will either have to “start anew”, or Israel will, as Ibrahim calculated, be crushed by the equations it has tried to ignore.

https://orinocotribune.com/a-resistance ... -long-war/

******

A front-row seat to the implosion of Israel’s government

Amid an existential war, Israel’s government is fracturing under unprecedented internal conflicts and divisions as power struggles threaten to dismantle its leadership and transform a once formidable state into an irreparably fractured entity.


Anis Raiss

SEP 4, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

Imagine a once-dominant sports team now in disarray: players rebelling against their coach, the coaching staff at odds, and fans, representing the Israeli public, protesting en masse in the streets. This is the current state of affairs in Israel.

Just two days ago, Israel witnessed yet another massive protest ignited by the deaths of six captives held in Gaza. The discovery of their bodies triggered widespread anger and led to hundreds of thousands of Jewish Israelis taking to the streets of Tel Aviv and other major cities. Amid clashes with police, they demanded Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu conclude a ceasefire agreement with Hamas, while calls were made for a general strike by the national labor union.

The occupation forces, the cornerstone of Israel’s expansionist ambitions, are faltering under internal disputes. Public spats between Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir reveal a government in chaos, with clashing agendas and eroding strategy.

Even the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security service, has criticized extremist influences within the government, further exposing the deepening rifts. Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar has taken to calling the forces of extremism “Jewish terrorism,” which he believes will “endanger Israel’s existence.”

Netanyahu’s Napoleonic parallels and internal discord

Prime Minister Netanyahu’s recent actions have exposed these fractures further. On 17 July, during a Knesset debate, Netanyahu dismissed calls for an independent civilian probe into the 7 October Al-Aqsa Flood resistance operation, comparing these demands to bureaucratic distractions faced by military leaders during the Napoleonic wars.

He suggested that any inquiry should wait until after the war on Gaza ends, revealing a reluctance to prioritize transparency during wartime.

Netanyahu’s comparison to Napoleon is telling: just as Napoleon’s retreat from Russia signaled his downfall, Netanyahu’s avoidance of accountability foreshadows a similar retreat into failure. As Hamas snipers and ambushes inflict daily casualties on Israeli forces, what once seemed like a swift, decisive campaign has devolved into a protracted conflict, reflecting disloyalty and despair within Netanyahu’s ranks.

The Knesset vote back in June to advance the Haredi Draft Law, requiring ultra-Orthodox Jews to serve in the military, has also sparked feelings of betrayal among Israeli reservists. For years, the Haredim, who enjoy significant political influence within the state, have avoided conscription, citing religious study as their basis for exemption.

Reservists, already overextended by the widening war, feel abandoned by a government prioritizing political alliances over national security needs, deepening the divide between Israel’s secular and religious communities.

Clearly, the discord extends beyond political disagreements, deeply permeating Tel Aviv’s security apparatus. On 20 August, a mother of one of the Israeli prisoners speaking at an independent “civilian commission” revealed that Mossad director David Barnea had told her that a prisoner deal is impossible “because of politics.” The Mossad later denied this claim.

Meanwhile, families of captives accused Ben Gvir of obstructing prisoner exchange efforts, further inflaming public sentiment and intensifying discord within the occupation government.

Jewish terrorism and the erosion of military unity

Ben Gvir embodies the growing disarray within Israel’s governance. On 19 April, he tweeted a single word – “Dardaleh!” Hebrew slang for weak or disappointing – following Israel’s alleged attack on Iran. This tweet publicly mocked the Israeli military, stripping away the veneer of strength that Tel Aviv strives to project.

Ben Gvir’s recklessness didn’t stop there. After Iran’s initial retaliatory strikes earlier that month, which he claimed destroyed two Israeli military bases and caused heavy casualties – statements starkly contradicting the official narrative – Ben Gvir deepened the existing fissures within Israel’s leadership.

His remarks struck a blow to the carefully curated image of military unity that Israel’s leadership tries to maintain, embarrassing a military apparatus that prides itself on projecting invincibility.

Ben Gvir’s provocations extend to frequent visits to and inflammatory remarks over the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem, a site of immense religious significance and historical tension. These visits, accompanied by armed Israeli security forces, far from being mere symbolic gestures, have ignited conflict not only with Palestinians but also within Israel’s government and the international community.

On 13 August, during Tisha B’Av – one of many such inflammatory appearances – Ben Gvir’s actions were widely condemned across Israel. Gallant and Bar expressed deep concern about creating “internal division” and the growing phenomenon of “Jewish terrorism.”

Tel Aviv’s projection of its own fears

This warning echoes the psychological concept of “projection,” theorized by Sigmund Freud, where individuals or groups project unwanted traits or fears onto others as a defense mechanism. In Israel’s case, the incessant branding of Gazans as “terrorists” mirrors the violent, extremist actions increasingly surfacing within its leadership and society.

The occupation government, fervent in its denunciation of external terror, now faces the unsettling truth that its own societal fabric is fraying, with many within its ranks embracing the very tactics they decry.

Complicating matters further, Ben Gvir’s wife, Ayala Nimrodi, plays a role in the Temple Mount Administration, entrenching its influence over one of the most volatile religious sites in West Asia. While her involvement may not significantly impact decision-making, it underscores the personal investment that the pair have in asserting Jewish control over the site.

This illustrates a concerning level of unprofessionalism – even by Israeli standards within the occupation government – where personal and political lives dangerously intertwine. Much like Sara Netanyahu, the scandal-plagued wife of Israel’s prime minister, Nimrodi’s role highlights how personal interests can entangle with national policy, exacerbating tensions and alienating key figures within the government.

The Kahanist divide

Ben Gvir’s background further amplifies the severity of these developments. A disciple of Meir Kahane, whose Kach party was banned in Israel for its racist and violent ideology and who was listed on the US State Department’s terror list, Ben Gvir has long been controversial.

His Kahanist roots are characterized by a belief in Jewish supremacy – an ideology that views Jews as Übermenschen and others as Untermenschen. This supremacist mindset is not confined to Ben Gvir alone but permeates Israeli governance. The distinction between left and right has blurred, leaving only the right and the far-right, with this ideology influencing policies that perpetuate inequality and tension.

Ben Gvir is not just a dissonant voice; he represents a rift that has always simmered beneath the surface, now threatening to unravel the illusion of leadership that Israel’s political structure has long projected.

This isn’t a case of a once-cohesive leadership being torn apart, but rather the exposure of an inherent fragility masked by the façade of unity. Ben Gvir’s actions are the sparks igniting these long-present cracks, revealing the underlying instability of the Zionist enterprise.

And it is causing Israeli Jews to abandon the state and flee to other safer countries; over 500,000 since 7 October, many who cite both insecurity and rising Jewish extremism as reasons for their decision.

From supremacy to chaos

Amid a regional war, Israel’s government is mired in conflict, with Ben Gvir at the center of several disputes. His recent threat to dissolve the cabinet highlights his destabilizing influence. The deep mistrust between Netanyahu and Ben Gvir stems from the latter’s determination to push an extremist ideology now pervasive within Israeli politics, blurring the lines between far-right and mainstream.

Ben Gvir’s actions have not only strained his relationship with Netanyahu but have also deepened divisions among other key figures, such as Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, who clash over policies that could undermine Israel’s security. Those policies have also caused conflict between Gallant and Netanyahu, with the latter threatening to fire his own defense minister on several occasions.

Meanwhile, Justice Minister Yariv Levin’s push for judicial reforms has sparked widespread protests, further fragmenting the cabinet and threatening Israel’s legal bases and separations of powers.

The Israeli cabinet now resembles an old episode of The Jerry Springer Show – a chaotic spectacle where every figure is at each other’s throats, accusations fly, and the underlying dysfunction is glaringly exposed.

In this entertaining political circus, Ben Gvir’s provocations, including his threats to dissolve the cabinet, are not mere maneuvers – they are strategies designed to exploit weaknesses within Israel’s leadership.

Just as Ben Gvir once tore the emblem from the car of Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin – assassinated in 1995 by a Jewish extremist who opposed the Oslo Accords – in symbolically challenging unity, he and other likeminded officials now threaten to dismantle that unity altogether, and shatter it from within.

https://thecradle.co/articles/a-front-r ... government

Israeli drone bombs Tubas on ninth day of West Bank assault

Troops reinvaded the cities of Tubas and Tulkarem and besieged Jenin’s main hospital and municipal building

News Desk

SEP 5, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: X)

Five Palestinians were killed in an Israeli drone strike on a car in the occupied West Bank city of Tubas on 5 September, coming hours after troops reinvaded the city earlier that day following its brief withdrawal last week.


“Ambulance crews retrieved five dead youths from the targeted vehicle,” Palestinian Red Crescent sources told WAFA news agency.

The slain Palestinians have been identified as 24-year-old Ahmed Fawaz Fayez Abu Dawas, 30-year-old Mohammed Awad Salem Abu Juma, 26-year-old Qusay Majdi Abdullah Abdul Razek, 23-year-old Mohammed Nazmi Abu Zagha, and 21-year-old Mohammed Zakaria Mohammed al-Zubaidi.

One of those killed in the strike was the son of the prisoner Zakaria al-Zubaidi, one of the six Palestinians who broke out of the maximum security Gilboa prison in 2021.

Two other Palestinians were injured in the airstrike.

A 16-year-old Palestinian had been shot dead by Israeli forces in the Faraa camp on Wednesday.

Clashes reignited in the Faraa camp south of Tubas following Israel’s reinvasion of the West Bank city during the early hours of Thursday.

“Our brave fighters were able to target the Zionist enemy forces storming the Faraa camp with a highly explosive device in the market axis, achieving direct hits among the enemy's ranks,” the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades Tubas branch said in a statement early on 5 September.

Israeli troops also reentered the city of Tulkarem on Thursday following a withdrawal at dawn, besieging a hospital and reinvading the city’s camp.

Meanwhile, the Israeli siege of Jenin has been ongoing since the army launched a massive operation in the West Bank late last month.

Israeli troops pushed deeper into the city on 5 September, besieging its main hospital and surrounding the Jenin Municipality building.

Palestinian ministers were supposed to hold a press conference inside the municipality building but were prevented from doing so by the siege, Jenin’s governor Kamal Abu al-Rab said.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades said at noon on Thursday that its fighters were engaged in fierce clashes with troops storming the town of Yamoun near Jenin. The fighters also targeted Israeli troops who were besieging a home in Yamoun, according to the resistance faction’s media page.


Israel launched its current West Bank operation on 28 August. The operation is the largest of its kind since the Second Intifada.

Security officials told Israel Hayom newspaper on 3 September that the Israeli army has internally classified the occupied West Bank as “the second most critical front, immediately after Gaza.”

At least 39 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli troops since the operation began, including 21 in Jenin, eight in Tulkarm, seven in Tubas, and three in Hebron.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israeli-d ... nk-assault

Netanyahu ‘doing all he can’ to block Gaza ceasefire deal: Report

Government sources said Netanyahu decided ‘weeks ago’ to use the Philadelphi corridor as leverage for blocking a deal

News Desk

SEP 4, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Flash90)

A source from within Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition told Haaretz on 4 September that the premier does not want an exchange deal to go through and has done his best to sabotage the negotiations.

“Not one minister, including those who know that Netanyahu is sabotaging a deal, will do anything,” the coalition source said. “They are bound to one another, their political survival depends on the government’s survival, and therefore this situation will continue. Netanyahu will pursue an endless war because that’s what is good for him.”

The prime minister “decided some weeks ago that he does not want a deal, and when it became possible, he got nervous and did all he could to torpedo it. He figured out that by using the Philadelphi corridor, he could also draw the sane right to his side,” the source added.

Israel’s negotiating team has told mediators that it still supports a withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor on the Gaza–Egypt border despite Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s vow to maintain an indefinite presence there, according to reports in Israeli media.

“Negotiators told mediators in recent days that they still support a complete withdrawal of the IDF from the Philadelphi Corridor in the second phase of a potential hostage deal,” Times of Israel reported on 4 September.

An Arab diplomat told the outlet hours before Netanyahu’s press conference on Monday that Mossad chief David Barnea flew to Doha to inform Qatar’s prime minister of the Israeli position regarding the Philadelphi Corridor.

Barnea told mediators that “Israel was prepared to withdraw from the Philadelphi corridor … in the second stage of a hostage release deal,” Haaretz newspaper reported on 3 September, citing foreign sources familiar with the negotiations.

Haaretz also cited a source as saying that the US proposal currently being negotiated will call for a reduced presence of Israeli troops in the first, six-week phase of a deal and then a withdrawal in the second phase.

The newspaper says this is consistent with the outline announced by US President Joe Biden in late May.

“Israel informed the mediators of its readiness to consider a complete withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor during the second phase of the deal ... but estimates in Israel indicate that Sinwar will reject the broad outlines of any deal that includes this because he does not believe that the deal will reach its second phase … Therefore, he is demanding a complete withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor during the first phase,” Yedioth Ahronoth cited sources as saying.

A withdrawal in the second phase is “unacceptable to the resistance,” a Palestinian source told Al Mayadeen on Wednesday. “Hamas insists on the withdrawal of the occupation forces from the Philadelphi Corridor in the first phase because there are no certain guarantees to reach the second phase,” the source added.

Netanyahu held a press conference on Monday, where he argued that there was a “strategic imperative” to keep troops on the Philadelphi Corridor.

“We will not go out. The importance of the Philadelphi Corridor is cardinal – to bring out the hostages, to ensure that Hamas is destroyed, and that Gaza will not again be a threat to us,” he said.

Last week, Netanyahu and his security cabinet voted overwhelmingly to keep troops along the corridor.

Defense Minister Yoav Gallant called days later for an immediate reversal of the vote, with the families of captives berating Netanyahu for the decision.

“After close to a year of neglect, Netanyahu doesn’t miss a single opportunity to ensure that there won’t be a deal. Not a day goes by that Netanyahu doesn’t take concrete action to jeopardize the return home of all the hostages,” they said.

The US is working on a final “take it or leave it” proposal which it will present in the coming weeks, the Washington Post reported on Sunday.

A Hamas official in Lebanon, Bassam Khalaf, told the Ultra Palestine outlet on Wednesday that the resistance movement has yet to receive anything related to a new proposal.

https://thecradle.co/articles/netanyahu ... eal-report

*****

Biden, Harris, and the Brutal Truth of Dead Hostages in Gaza
Posted on September 4, 2024 by Yves Smith

Yves here. As most of you know, protestors in Israel came out en masse to pressure the Netanyahu government into negotiating a ceasefire deal to secure the release of Hamas hostages after six were killed. While this article reports that the defense ministry and security forces are even more opposed to the hardliner refusal to reach an agreement with Hamas than before, Netanyahu is using the death as yet another pretext not to come to an agreement with Hamas, that it would effectively be rewarding them.

Keep in mind that Hamas did not kill the hostages for sport. Hamas claims that Israel shot them during an attempted rescue; Israel says the reverse. Alastair Crooke explained why given the givens that Hamas would have felt it necessary to execute them. Starting at 30:20:



I’ve done hostage negotiations. And this is the basic rule. You start in a hostage negotiation. The hostage takers say, “If we detect any signs of an attempt at a military release, we kill the hostage immediately.” And so, all those negotiators have to be so careful. If they heard an aircraft they weren’t expecting, they heard an engine sort of nearby, they can just go kill the hostages. I don’t think that Hamas was quite as trigger happy as that, but undoubtedly, the attempt to rescue them, the sense that they attempted to pre-empt an attempted Israeli rescue, like I think on the 8th of June when 274 Palestinians were killed and four hostages were released. So they decided they wanted to pre-empt that. I’m sorry to say, it’s an unpleasant fact of hostage life.

A point the Anglosphere media generally skips over is what a farce these negotiations have been. Hamas has made clear it will not give up hostages for anything less than a long-term, as in expected to be permanent, ceasefire. Israel keeps insisting it will persist in the war until it destroys Hamas, which really means ethnically cleanse Gaza, and since no neighboring state will take in lots of Palestinians, that means genocide. We’ve had the intelligence-insulting spectacle of the Biden Administration acting again and again as if a deal is nigh, when nothing fundamental has changed on the Israel side. Indeed, the Hamas side has complained that when they make concessions, Israel adds new demands.

Part of the reason for continuing this sham is that the Administration seems to believe, and may be correct, that Hezbollah and Iran will hold off on retaliation and escalation if hostilities look about to end. You can be sure the US would try to make the charge that they’d mendaciously attacked on the eve of a deal if either one were to make a big move.

It would be nice to hope that the big protest, and prospect of more, would force Netanyahu to relent. But the settler-brownshirts appear to be in the ascendant, witness the big escalation in West Bank. This article describes how the power struggle in the street is between the liberal Ashkenazi and the one-time underclass of the Middle Eastern Jews in Israel, the Haredim, who recently got a majority of seats in the Knesset. Sadly, the balance of forces, politically and physically, seems to favor the hardliners.

By David Hearst, the Editor of the Middle East Eye. Originally published at Middle East Eye; cross posted from Common Dreams

The recovery of six further dead hostages has set off a tidal wave of fury in Israel.

Demonstrations, not seen since the protests over judicial reform, are shaking the country.

Israelis are calling it an uprising.

Tens of thousands of Israelis have walked out of their jobs in a general strike. Both the defence minister, Yoav Gallant, and the security establishment are in open conflict with their prime minister.

Opposition leaders Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid called for people to go onto the streets. And they have. The main highways around Tel Aviv are blocked.

However the hostages died—Hamas initially indicated they were killed by Israeli gunfire, the Israeli army says they were executed at close range just before an attempt was made to free them—the blame for their deaths has settled firmly on Benjamin Netanyahu and the ultra-right-wing clique that props up his government.

Four of the six hostages were on Hamas’ “humanitarian” list of captives and would have been released in the first stage of a hostage deal had Netanyahu not refused to withdraw from the Philadelphi corridor separating Egypt from Gaza.

This is not speculation.

Undermining a Possible Deal

Israeli security chiefs who repeatedly warned Netanyahu about what would happen to the remaining hostages if he continued to scupper a deal are saying so themselves.

Three days ago, a regular cabinet security briefing turned into a shouting match between Gallant and Netanyahu, Axios reported.

Gallant reportedly told the meeting: “We have to choose between Philadelphi and the hostages. We can’t have both. If we vote, we might find out that either the hostages will die or we will have to backtrack to release them.”

Gallant, Israeli army Chief of Staff General Herzi Halevi and Mossad Director David Barnea, the head of the Israeli negotiating team, all confronted Netanyahu and his proposal to vote on a resolution to maintain full Israeli control along the border with Egypt that they said would undermine a possible deal with Hamas.

“We warned Netanyahu and the cabinet ministers about this exact scenario but they wouldn’t listen,” a senior Israeli official told Axios. The vote went ahead with the majority in favour.

However the hostages met their deaths, what the families of the hostages clearly understood is that this group of hostages were alive shortly before the army’s attempt to rescue them.

“A deal for the return of the hostages has been on the table for over two months. If it weren’t for his [Netanyahu’s] thwarting, the excuses and the spins, the hostages whose deaths we learned of this morning would probably be alive,” the Hostages and Missing Families Forum said in a statement.

The deaths of the hostages have also reverberated across the US, in the same way that the Hamas attack on 7 October did.

Not least because the parents of one of the dead, Hersh Goldberg-Polin, a US citizen, spoke on stage at the Democratic National Convention as thousands in the audience chanted “Bring them back”.

In response, the outgoing US President Joe Biden vowed to “make Hamas pay” for these deaths and the party’s presidential nominee Kamala Harris said that Hamas must be eliminated.

Both know that the responsibility for the hostages’ deaths lies with them too.

The Brutal Truth

Biden clearly and unequivocally called for a permanent ceasefire four months ago. The UN passed a resolution for a comprehensive three-stage ceasefire in June.

It is Biden’s first duty as commander in chief to make sure a key security ally in the Middle East abides by US policy, especially an ally as dependent on the supply of US arms as Israel is.

The brutal truth of these killings is that if Biden had been prepared to enforce his own policy with an arms embargo, a ceasefire would now be in place and many of the remaining hostages, Americans and Britons among them, would be freed.

If anyone should be looking at himself in the mirror at Goldberg-Polin’s death, it should be Biden.

For Harris to meekly follow in these footsteps is folly. She should remember what her own generals have said about the impossibility of defeating Hamas in Gaza.

It could nevertheless be that these deaths are the tipping point that forces Netanyahu to U-turn in negotiations, which still remain deadlocked.

The US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan told the families of the US hostages held in Gaza that the US will present Israel and Hamas with a take-it-or-leave-it final offer on a ceasefire deal.

This has been said many times before, and one reason why US officials have lost all credibility with independent negotiators Egypt and Qatar.

However, if what results is a phased Israeli withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor, and Netanyahu buckles under the domestic and international pressure, he knows full well he will be tipped into another crisis.

End of Ashkenazi Control

It’s not just the likelihood that Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister, and Itamar Ben Gvir, the national security minister, the two of the most extreme in his government, will walk out as they have repeatedly threatened to do.

Netanyahu knows that Israel is split down the middle. He has more than half of the country demanding he “finish the job” that David Ben Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, failed to complete.

This uprising, like the demonstrations against the judicial reforms last year, is one of the last throws of the dice for the liberal Ashkenazi elite.

They sense they are losing control of the country they built. They have already lost control of the army and the police force to the settlers. Not much is left in their exclusive hands and there has been an exodus of Israelis and money to Europe over the last year to prove it.

Netanyahu is not solely acting out of personal political survival. He, too, senses Israel is on the cusp of a right-wing revolution. That is why every political instinct tells him the stakes are so high. If it happens, it will be totally at odds with a Democrat US presidency.

Unravelling in Real Time

Biden should also be looking himself in the mirror at what is happening in the Occupied West Bank.

Unable, for a variety of reasons not least military preparedness, to open a second front against Hezbollah in Lebanon, Netanyahu has turned his attention on the three towns in the north of the West Bank in a full-scale military operation called “Operation Summer Camps” designed to force a population transfer.

As night follows day, attacks have begun on Israeli troops all over the West Bank and particularly in the southern Hebron area.

Biden and Harris should take note of who shot three Israeli policemen dead in response to the army operation in the north.

The shooter was a member of Fatah and a former Palestinian presidential security guard. Furthermore, Muhannad al-Asood, a resident of Idhna in Hebron, who was born in Jordan and was a citizen of the country, returned to his native West Bank in 1998 with his family after obtaining family reunification.

Asood’s personal history carries a clear warning for the consequences of how Palestinians in the West Bank will react to the opening of a second front of this war in the occupied territories, using much the same weapons and techniques in Jenin, Tulkarm and Tubas as they did in Gaza.

Asood was not a member of Hamas or Islamic Jihad or part of any known local resistance group. He made an individual decision that resistance was the only answer to Israel’s military offensive.

There are hundreds of thousands of armed, unaffiliated Palestinians like him in the West Bank and Jordan who are coming to the same conclusion.

Furthermore, tensions between Jordan and Israel are mounting exponentially.

The launch of the offensive was accompanied by a war of words between Israel’s foreign minister, Israel Katz, and hisJordanian counterpart, Ayman Safadi.

Katz not only told Jenin’s residents to leave in a “temporary” evacuation. He repeatedly accused Jordan of the build-up of arms in the camps, claiming it was unable to control its own territory.

“Iran is building Islamic terror infrastructure in Judea and Samaria, flooding refugee camps with funds and weapons smuggled through Jordan, aiming to establish an eastern terror front against Israel. This process also threatens the stability of the Jordanian regime. The world must wake up and stop the Iranian octopus before it’s too late,” Katz tweeted on X.

All lies, his Jordanian counterpart retorted.

Safadi wrote: “We reject the claims of the extremist racist ministers who fabricate threats to justify the killing of Palestinians and the destruction of their capabilities. The Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories, the Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people, and the Israeli escalation in the region constitute the greatest threat to security and peace.

“We will oppose with all our capabilities any attempt to displace the Palestinian people inside or outside the occupied territories.”

A Larger Conflagration

Now in its fifth day, the stage is set once more for an operation in the occupied West Bank which could last as long as Gaza and which the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is powerless to stop.

Palestinian teenagers are fighting back. Wael Mishah and Tariq Daoud were born after Oslo. They did not see the First or Second Intifadas.

Both had been released during a prisoner exchange between Israel and Hamas in November. On his release Mishah talked of the plight of children being beaten and abused in Israeli prisons.

Mishah’s short journey was preordained. “He went from being a prisoner to being wanted, to confronting [the occupation], then a martyr,” his mother said.

He was killed by a drone at dawn on 15 August as he fought an Israeli raid on Nablus. There are thousands more like him who are being driven to battle.

Another fighter killed by Israel was the commander of the Tulkarm Battalion, Mohamed Jaber, known as Abu Shuja’a. He was described by Israel as its most wanted militant but he was only 26 years old, and born four years after Oslo. Abu Shuja’a was a refugee in Nur Shams Camp who came originally from Haifa. Killing him will inspire many more to join as he himself was inspired by others.

Even with the obvious reluctance of Hezbollah and Iran to get involved, all the ingredients are there for a much larger conflagration.

An Israel in the grip of an ultra nationalist , religious, settler insurgency; a US president who allows his signature policy to be flouted by his chief ally, even at the risk of losing a crucial election ; resistance that will not surrender; Palestinians in Gaza who will not flee; Palestinians in the West Bank who are now stepping up to the front line; Jordan, the second country to recognise Israel, feeling under existential threat.

For Biden or Harris, the message is so clear, it is flashing in neon lights: the regional costs of not standing up to Netanyahu could rapidly outweigh the domestic benefits of being dragged along by him.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/09 ... -gaza.html

*****

Gaza’s Children Face Extermination Amid Bombings, Disease and Famine
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 4, 2024
Ramzy Baroud

Image

The Israeli war on Gaza has become a war on Palestinian children. This was as true on October 7 as it is today.

On August 17, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for a seven-day ceasefire to allow children in Gaza to be vaccinated against polio. “I am appealing to all parties to provide concrete assurances right away, guaranteeing humanitarian pauses for the campaign,” he said.

The first such case of the devastating epidemic was discovered in the town of Deir Al-Balah in the central Gaza Strip.

“It is scientifically known that for every 200 virus infections, only one will show the full symptoms of polio, while the remaining cases may present mild symptoms such as a cold or a slight fever,” Palestinian Health Minister Majed Abu Ramadan said on that same day.

This means that the virus may have spread to all parts of the Gaza Strip, where the entire healthcare system has been largely destroyed.

The ten-month-old Palestinian baby who was first to contract the poliovirus, like many more, never received a vaccination dose against the disease.

To prevent an even greater disaster in war-stricken Gaza, the World Health Organization (WHO), along with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), said that they have to vaccinate 640,000 children throughout Gaza within a short period of time.

The task, however, is a difficult one, as the vast majority of Gazans are crammed into unsafe refugee camps – massive tent encampments, mostly in central Gaza with no access to clean water or electricity.

They are surrounded by over 330,000 tons of waste, which has further contaminated already undrinkable water which, according to experts, may have been the cause of the poliovirus.

The challenge of saving Gaza’s children is complicated by the fact that Israeli bombs continue to be dropped on every part of Gaza, including the so-called ‘safe zones’, which were declared by Israel soon after the start of the war.

The other problem is that Gaza has, for months, subsisted without electricity. Without an efficient cooling system, the majority of the vaccines could become unusable.

But there is more to the suffering of Gaza’s children than the lack of vaccination.

As of August 19, at least 16,480 children have been killed as a direct result of the war, in addition to thousands more who remain missing, presumed dead. The number, according to the Palestinian Minister of Health in Gaza, includes 115 babies.

Many children have starved to death, and “at least 3,500 children in Gaza are facing (the same fate) amid a lack of food and malnutrition under Israeli restrictions on the delivery of food,” a ministry spokesman said.

Additionally, so far, more than 17,000 children in Gaza have either lost one or both parents since the start of the war on October 7.

One of the main reasons why Gaza’s children account for the majority of victims of the war is that homes, schools and displacement shelters have been the main targets of the relentless bombardment.

According to a statement by the UN Experts last April, “more than 80% of schools in Gaza (have been) damaged or destroyed.”

“It may be reasonable to ask if there is an intentional effort to comprehensively destroy the Palestinian education system, an action known as ‘scholasticide’,” they wrote.

The trend of targeting schools continues. On August 18, Palestine’s Education Minister, Amjad Barham, said that over 90 percent of all Gaza schools have been destroyed, the official Palestinian news agency, WAFA, reported.

Of the 309 schools, 290 have been destroyed as a result of Israeli bombing. This has left 630,000 students with no access to education.

While homes and schools can be rebuilt, the precious lives of killed children cannot be restored.

According to the Palestinian Ministry of Education, as of July 2, 8,572 students in Gaza and 100 in the occupied West Bank have been killed at the hands of the Israeli army. 14,089 students in Gaza and 494 in the West Bank have also been injured.

These are the worst losses suffered by Palestinian children within a relatively brief period of time since the Nakba, the destruction of the Palestinian homeland in 1948. The tragedy worsens by the day.

No child, let alone a whole generation of children, should endure this much suffering, regardless of the political reasoning or context.

International and humanitarian law has designated a “special respect and protection” for children during times of armed conflict, the international humanitarian law databases of the Red Cross resolve. These laws may apply to Palestinian children in theory, but certainly not in practice.

The betrayal of these children by the international community shall stain the collective consciousness of humankind for decades to come.

Indeed, this is a war on Palestinian children – a war that must stop before a whole generation of Palestinian children is completely erased.

Feature photo | Children search for food in the garbage in Deir al-Balah. According to UN’Experts, famine has spread across the entire Gaza strip, due to Israel’s ongoing war and siege on Gaza, July 15, 2024. Abed Rahim Khatib | AP

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... nd-famine/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Sep 06, 2024 11:19 am

The Brutal Wish of a Failed Israeli Diplomat
September 4, 2024

There is more to Gilad Erdan’s hatred of the U.N. than the mere frustration of a disappointed diplomat, writes Ramzy Baroud.

Image
Gilad Erdan, Israel’s then U.N. ambassador, shredding a page of the U.N. Charter on May 10 as he addresses a General Assembly session on “Illegal Israeli actions in occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” (UN Photo/Manuel Elías)

By Ramzy Baroud
Z Network

Former Israeli ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, clearly had an unpleasant experience at the world’s largest international institution [which he left last month].

In an interview published in the Israeli newspaper Maariv on Aug. 20, the disgruntled envoy said that “the U.N. building should be closed and wiped off from the face of the earth.”

Whether Erdan has made this realization or not, his aggressive statement indicates that his four-year career as Israel’s top U.N. diplomat was a failure.

In the interview, Erdan expressed his wish to become the head of Likud, the right-wing party of current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Erdan’s violent language could be his way of appealing to the right and far-right constituencies that feed on such violence.

However, there is more to Erdan’s hatred for the U.N. than the mere frustration of a disappointed diplomat.

Israel has had a long and troubled history with the United Nations and other U.N.-linked institutions. According to Israel’s political discourse, the U.N. is an “anti-Semitic” organization, a label Israelis often invoke when their country is subjected to the slightest criticism.

Israel’s relationship with the U.N. is particularly odd because Israel was created by a U.N. decision, itself a direct outcome of U.N. political intrigues and Western pressure.

On Nov. 29, 1947, the U.N. passed resolution 181, calling for the division of historic Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. It assigned most of the land, 56 percent, to the Jewish population, then a minority, and the rest to the Palestinian Arab natives.

Image
Ad Hoc Committee on the Palestinian Question approving the resolution on the partition of Palestine into Arab and Jewish States during the second session of the General Assembly in Flushing Meadows, New York, November 1947. (UN Photo/Albert Fox)

Shortly after, Jewish Zionist leadership began a military campaign that conquered most of Palestine and ethnically cleansed most of its original population.

Israel was admitted as a full U.N. member on May 11, 1949, while native Palestinians remain stateless.

Though Israel’s admission to the international body was conditioned on the acceptance of Resolutions 181 and 194 – on the status of Jerusalem and the right of return of Palestinian refugees – Israel was spared punishment for these and other resolutions, thanks to strong backing from Washington and other Western powers.

In June 1967, the rest of historic Palestine was conquered. Again, hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were ethnically cleansed and, ever since, the remaining Palestinians have lived under a draconian system of military occupation, apartheid, siege and a constant state of war.

Image
An Israeli gunboat passes through the Straits of Tiran near Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, during the Six Day War in 1967. (Israel government, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons)

The ongoing Israeli genocide in the Gaza Strip is the culmination of all the injustices inflicted on the Palestinian people throughout the decades. The war did not start on Oct. 7, 2023, nor will it end when a ceasefire is finally declared.

Aside from the Balfour Declaration, where Britain pledged to construct a Jewish state in historic Palestine in November 1917, U.N. Resolution 181, which allowed the establishment of Israel, could arguably be considered the genesis of all Palestinian suffering.

Throughout this bloody, unjust history, the U.N. neither penalized Israel nor granted Palestinians their long overdue justice. It even failed to implement or enforce any of its subsequent resolutions recognizing the illegality of the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Yet, Palestinians continue to resort to the U.N., since it is their only international platform that could constantly remind Israel, and the world, that Tel Aviv is an occupying power and that international and humanitarian laws must apply to Palestinians as an occupied nation.

[For instance, the General Assembly in 2012 voted to make Palestine an Observer State of the U.N., allowing it to join the International Criminal Court and various U.N. agencies.]

These reminders were made frequently in the past, at the U.N. General Assembly and even at the Security Council, always to the displeasure of Israel and its Western benefactors, mainly the United States.

The last solid legal position was articulated through an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on July 19. After the testimonies and interventions made by at least 52 countries and countless experts, the ICJ resolved that “Israel’s occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is unlawful, along with the associated settlement regime, annexation and use of natural resources.”

Image
Members of the International Court of Justice on July 19, the day they delivered they opinion on the illegality of Israeli policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. (ICJ)

Although the U.N. [largely because of the U.S. veto] has not made any difference in forcing Israel to end its occupation, dismantle illegal settlements or respect the basic human rights of Palestinians, the international institution remains a source of frustration for Israel.

Since its establishment on the ruins of Palestinian homes, Israel has worked to change the status of Palestine and Palestinian refugees, and constantly challenged the very term “occupation.” It has done its utmost to rewrite history, illegally annexed Palestinian and Arab land, and built illegal settlements as if permanent “facts on the ground.”

In 2017, it looked as if Israel was succeeding in its quest to cancel the Palestinian cause altogether when Washington recognized Israel’s fraudulent claims to Occupied East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Golan Heights. Yet, the world did not follow suit, as demonstrated in the ICJ’s recent legal ruling.

As far as the United Nations is concerned, Israel remains an occupying power, bound to international laws and norms.

Though for Palestinians, such facts remain devoid of practical meaning, for Israel, the U.N. position is a major obstacle in the face of its blatant settler colonial project. And this is why Erdan wants the U.N. “wiped off from the face of the earth.”

Even if the angry Israeli diplomat gets his wish, nothing will alter this historic truth: Israel will remain a colonial regime, and Palestine will continue to resist, till justice is finally restored.

https://consortiumnews.com/2024/09/04/t ... -diplomat/

******

Hostages or Settlers? The Language of the Zionist Occupation
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 5, 2024
Struggle – La Lucha

Image
Above, displaced Palestinians gather at a food distribution center in Deir al Balah, central Gaza Strip, on Aug. 30.

The apartheid regime in occupied Palestine is holding 2.3 million people hostage in Gaza. Roughly 10,000 Palestinian hostages are in “Israeli” jails. Some 3 million Palestinians are hostages in another open-air prison, a maze of corridors and partitions in the occupied West Bank.

If “Israel” wants its “hostages” back so badly, then it should end the siege on Gaza. The Palestinian resistance cannot and should not give an inch.


On Sunday, Zionist occupation forces announced that six “hostages” were found dead near the Rafah border crossing. The announcement sparked all sorts of outrage among the “Israeli” fascist masses.

Demonstrations numbering in the hundreds of thousands of people rocked cities across “Israel.” Further, occupied Palestine’s largest labor union, Histadrut, has called a general strike that will last until the “hostages” are brought back within the 1967 borders.

The central demands of the demonstrations and Histadrut revolved around Zionist captives currently held in Gaza. Zionist society and Western media frame these captives as “hostages” to garner sympathy and rally mass fascist support against Palestine.

The phrase “Bring Them Home” has become a rallying cry for the forces behind the current demonstrations. While these protests are anti-Netanyahu, they should not be misconstrued as progressive. This movement’s main gripe against Netanyahu stems from a belief that these six dead captives could have been saved if Netanyahu had not hijacked ceasefire/prisoner exchange talks. The demands of these current “Israeli” protests and strikes are entirely centered around the “hostages.” There is zero language around Palestine.

First things first, these six individuals who died were not hostages. They were Zionists and settlers. For an occupying force to brutally enforce genocide and apartheid against a people and then shame the occupied for their resistance is nothing more than pearl-clutching and political theater.

The blood of every single person, Palestinian or Zionist captive, killed in Gaza covers the hands of the Zionist regime and its imperialist backers. If there was no Zionist occupation, there would be no war. There would be no genocide. There would be no need for Palestinian forces to take prisoners of war, let alone for fascist stormtroopers to launch retrieval missions into Gaza.

Second, the biggest threat to the lives of Zionist captives in Gaza is not any Palestinian resistance organization. The biggest killer of Zionist captives in Gaza is their own Zionist government.


“Israeli” air strikes alone have killed dozens of Zionist captives inside Gaza. This does not even account for all those who have died and are currently dying of starvation and disease due to the generally abhorrent conditions inside the world’s largest open-air concentration camp. The Zionist regime does not care about these people’s lives. To Netanyahu and the IOF, the “hostages” need to stay exactly where they are to continue justifying the war.

Third, these current demonstrations against Netanyahu around the hostages are not progressive, nor are they anti-Zionist in nature, not even close. For the largest “Israeli” labor union to call a general strike over the deaths of six Zionist settlers but remain silent while the Zionist regime murders tens of thousands of Palestinians in cold blood is laughable. What real labor union fundamentally values one ethnicity of workers over another? The answer is, none. Like so many institutions inside the 1948 borders, Histadrut has become just another mouthpiece for genocide.

If “Israel” wants its “hostages” back so badly, then it should end the siege on Gaza. The Palestinian resistance cannot and should not give an inch.

Palestine will be free.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... ccupation/

******

ICC prosecutor says world leaders 'threatened' him over Israel arrest warrants

The International Criminal Court judges have yet to issue arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister and defense minister four months after prosecutor Karim Khan requested them

News Desk

SEP 5, 2024

Image
International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan at the Cour d'Honneur of the Palais Royal in Paris on February 7, 2024. (Photo credit: Dimitar DILKOFF / AFP)

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) says world leaders pressured him not to apply for arrest warrants for the Israeli prime minister and defense minister on allegations of war crimes in Gaza, the BBC reported on 5 September.

Karim Khan told the BBC, “Several leaders and others told me and advised me and cautioned me,” he said.

In May, Khan said there were reasonable grounds to believe that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant had committed war crimes during the Israeli assault on Gaza that has killed over 40,000 Palestinians, the majority women and children.

The state of Israel faces separate genocide charges at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

The chief prosecutor also applied for arrest warrants for Hamas leaders Yahiya Sinwar, Mohammed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh, claiming they bear criminal responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity for actions taken by the organization's armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, when it attacked Israeli military bases and settlements on 7 October.

Some 1,200 Israeli soldiers and civilians were killed in the attack. Some were killed by Hamas, while many were killed by Israeli forces using attack helicopters, drones, and tanks, per the controversial Hannibal directive.

Haniyeh, the head of Hamas' political bureau, was assassinated in Iran by an Israeli strike on 31 July. Israel claims Deif was also killed in an airstrike in Gaza, but Hamas officials have stated he is still alive.

Though several months have passed since Khan's application, ICC judges have not issued any arrest warrants.

Speaking to the BBC, Khan said it was important to show the court would hold all nations to the same standard in relation to alleged war crimes. He also welcomed the new UK government's recent decision to drop its opposition to the arrest warrants.

“There's a difference of tone, and I think of substance in relation to international law by the new government. And I think that's welcome,” he told the BBC's Nick Robinson.

Khan explained the ICC needed to request warrants for leaders on both sides of the conflict so that the court is viewed as applying “the law equally based upon some common standards.” “If one had applied for warrants in relation to Israeli officials and not for Gaza, [some would] say: 'Well, this is an obscenity' and, ‘How on earth is that possible?’” he said.

“You can't have one approach for countries where there's support, whether it's NATO support, European support [and] powerful countries behind you, and a different approach where you have clear jurisdiction,” he added.

In response to criticism for applying for arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, Khan stated, “I have one advantage at least. Hopefully, even they will concede I've seen the evidence. They haven't … The application is not public. It is confidential. It is filed to the chamber. So they are guessing what evidence has been submitted.”

This week, a pro-Israel legal group in the UK threatened to press charges against Khan, claiming that his efforts to issue arrest warrants against Israeli officials are based on false premises.

The organization UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) wrote a letter to Khan dated 27 August, in which it attempts to refute his allegations against Netanyahu and Gallant.

If Khan were to be charged and found guilty of that accusation, he could potentially – as a barrister in the most serious cases – be disbarred and forbidden from practicing law in the UK.

In May, a dozen Republican senators sent a letter warning Khan not to issue arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant.

“Target Israel, and we will target you,” the senators, led by Senator Tom Cotton, warned in the letter. “Such actions are illegitimate and lack legal basis, and, if carried out, will result in severe sanctions against you and your institution.” Senators Mitch McConnell (minority leader), Rick Scott, Tim Scott, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio also signed the letter.

https://thecradle.co/articles/icc-prose ... t-warrants

Majority of Israelis think sympathy for Gaza civilians should be censored on social media

The poll also shows that 72 percent of Israelis want graphic war-related images removed from social media

News Desk

SEP 5, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: Mustafa Hassona/AA via Getty Images)

Nearly 60 percent of Israelis believe social media posts showing sympathy for civilians in the Gaza Strip should be restricted, according to a poll published by Haaretz newspaper on 5 September.

The poll was conducted in March by the Pew Research Center.

Fifty-nine percent of Israelis “think posts expressing sympathy for civilians in Gaza should be restricted, while 41 percent think posts criticizing the government should be censored,” according to the poll.

The poll also shows that 92 percent of Israelis believe posts inciting violence should be restricted, 87 percent say posts expressing support for Hamas must be censored, and 72 percent want graphic footage from the war removed.

The poll makes clear a significant rift between Jewish and Arab Israelis. Seventy percent of Jewish Israelis support censoring content that shows sympathy for civilians in Gaza, while only 18 percent of Arab Israelis agree.

Additionally, fifty percent of Jewish Israelis support censorship of posts critical of the Israeli government, compared to 31 percent of Arab Israelis.

“Despite widespread social media use in Israel and political polarization, fewer than a quarter of Israelis (22 percent) regularly share or post about political or social issues,” the poll reveals.

Polls have provided significant insight into the views of Israelis regarding issues relating to the war in Gaza.

A poll conducted by the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) at Tel Aviv University, released last month, revealed that a majority of Israelis oppose the prosecution of soldiers responsible for raping Palestinian prisoners.

This came in the wake of the controversy regarding Israeli torture and sexual assault of Palestinians at the Sde Teiman detention center.

In June, a poll released by Israel’s I24 news site revealed that 40 percent of Israelis support a lasting occupation of the Gaza Strip.

Another poll conducted months earlier by Maariv showed that over 70 percent of Israelis support an escalation against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

https://thecradle.co/articles/majority- ... cial-media

Israel withholds troop testimonies on 7 Oct from US investigators[/b ]

The US collected witness testimony to file indictments against Hamas leaders, even though Israel has failed to do so

News Desk

SEP 5, 2024

Image
An Israeli soldier walks past a destroyed house in Kibbutz Be’eri, near the border with Gaza, on October 11, 2023. (Photo credit: Menahem Kahana / Getty)

Israel allowed US investigators to collect testimonies directly from witnesses who experienced the events of 7 October but refused to allow testimony to be collected from Israeli soldiers for fear they could be tried for war crimes, Hapeles newspaper reported on 5 September.

The Hebrew language Haredi daily reported that Lahav 433, a crime-fighting umbrella organization within the Israeli Police, allowed evidence to be taken to the US as part of the cooperation between Tel Aviv and Washington to file indictments in US courts against senior Hamas officials.

However, the state attorney and head of Lahav, Motti Levy, did not pass on any testimony collected from the approximately 700 soldiers interviewed.

The testimonies of the soldiers were collected as part of the national investigation, but in view of the fear that the materials and testimonies of the soldiers would be used to prosecute them in the US and also at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, their testimonies were not provided, the paper added.

Hamas attacked Israeli military bases and settlements on 7 October. Some 1,200 Israeli soldiers and civilians were killed in the attack. Some were killed by Hamas, while many were killed by Israeli forces using attack helicopters, drones, and tanks, per the controversial Hannibal directive.

Due to the Israeli military’s use of heavy weapons, many Israeli civilians and soldiers were burned to death by their own military while being brought as captives by Hamas to Gaza or were buried under the rubble of their homes in the settlements.

It is possible the soldiers' testimonies that were not sent to the US contain details about the Hannibal Directive.

As part of the investigation, the deputy legal advisor to the government, Gil Limon, traveled to the US about two months ago and held a meeting with the head of Lahav and the State Attorney.

On Wednesday, the Israeli Police criticized the State Attorney for not filing charges against Hamas leaders in Israel as the US had done, the Kan public broadcaster reported.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-wi ... estigators

Israel’s new ‘Pasha of Gaza’

Tel Aviv’s appointment of a high-ranking military official to manage Gaza’s civilian affairs is a strategic Israeli bid to craft a post-conflict reality and sidestep a ceasefire agreement.


Ibrahim Al-Madhoun

SEP 5, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

As part of a long-term strategy to exert greater control over Gaza, last week, the Israeli occupation army appointed Elad Goren as the first “head of the humanitarian-civil effort in the Gaza Strip.” This new role, focused on administering civilian affairs in Gaza, raises important questions about Tel Aviv’s intentions and its vision for the future of the decimated and besieged enclave.

Goren’s appointment comes as the brutal war on Gaza, entering its 11th month, has not only tested the resilience of the occupation military but also led to significant and ongoing repercussions on the ground.

Managing the crisis Israel created

The creation of this new position within the Defense Ministry’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) unit represents a notable shift in Israel’s approach to Gaza, indicating a movement toward more direct management of civilian affairs in the strip.

This decision is part of a broader strategy by the Israeli occupation to tighten its grip on Gaza while attempting to reshape the political dynamics to reduce the influence of Hamas. A similar divide-and-rule strategy has been employed in the West Bank to sow discord between the governing Palestinian Authority (PA) and the resistance factions there.

Goren’s role encompasses managing humanitarian aid, overseeing the operation of border crossings, restoring infrastructure destroyed by the Israelis, and coordinating with international aid organizations. Additionally, his appointment is seen as part of the occupation state’s efforts to establish a new framework for managing the Rafah crossing with Egypt, Gaza’s critical access point to the outside world, already under a stringent Israeli blockade.

According to the occupation army, the new role will “deal with the integration and implementation of the humanitarian effort in the Gaza Strip and the coordination with the international community, in a way that will allow the implementation of the humanitarian effort while upholding the security interests of the State of Israel.”

Strategic dimensions of installing Goren

Rather than addressing the pressing humanitarian crisis in the strip that comes courtesy of the occupation army’s brutal 10-month military assault on the strip, Goren’s appointment should be seen as a strategic move by Israel to solidify its presence and influence in Gaza.

By placing a high-ranking military official (Goren was promoted to brigadier general) in charge of civilian affairs, Israel signals its intent to maintain direct control over Gaza’s administration, potentially transforming the region into a zone of indirect military governance “for years to come.”

This move aligns with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s broader strategy to weaken Hamas and foster an alternative governance structure more amenable to Israeli interests. However, this approach is not without challenges.

The complexities of managing Gaza’s traumatized and displaced Palestinian population, coupled with growing international scrutiny and pressure, will complicate Tel Aviv’s efforts to assert its control. Additionally, the persistent resistance from Palestinian factions and their regional allies remains a formidable barrier to any attempt to alter the status quo.

Resisting plans to govern Gaza

Indeed, the multi-front conflict has taken its toll on the Israeli military, which has faced significant losses in confrontations with Palestinian resistance groups and engagements in the north with Hezbollah. This attrition highlights Israel’s difficulty in achieving its stated military objectives, with further escalation likely following the recent spate of high-profile assassinations. Palestinian resistance movements could capitalize on Israel’s troop attrition to bolster their capabilities and counter Tel Aviv’s plans for permanent control over Gaza.

Moreover, Israel struggles to gain international support for its actions in Gaza, further complicated by mounting domestic unrest from the Netanyahu government’s refusal to negotiate a ceasefire deal with Hamas that would remove Israeli troops from the territory.

As such, Palestinian resistance should focus on international advocacy, highlighting Israeli violations and galvanizing global opinion to increase diplomatic pressure on Israel to exit the strip entirely. Strengthening national unity among Palestinian factions is also crucial; a unified front is vital to effectively counter Israel’s efforts to fragment Palestinian society and weaken the resistance.

Several scenarios could emerge following the latest steps by the occupation state toward its post-war plans for Gaza. If diplomatic efforts fail or no ceasefire agreement is reached, Gaza could experience increased military confrontations as Israel seeks to impose new realities and governance.

In such a case, Palestinian resistance would need to escalate military operations and enhance coordination among the factions to effectively counter Israeli strategies.

Alternatively, if Palestinian resistance successfully mobilizes international opinion, heightened diplomatic pressure could force Israel to halt its military plans in Gaza. This scenario might lead to a ceasefire backed by international guarantees, preventing Israel from reverting to its previous policies.

Political strategy with armed pressure

However, the ongoing conflict and blockade could exacerbate Gaza’s humanitarian crisis, posing new setbacks for the resistance in terms of meeting the population’s basic needs. Addressing this crisis would require close cooperation with international organizations to mitigate the impact on civilians.

Elad Goren’s appointment as head of the “humanitarian-civil” effort in Gaza is a clear indication of Israel’s strategic intent to tighten its control over the strip and undermine the resistance. More likely than not, this move will be met with increased Palestinian resistance, as we have seen in the Philadelphi and Netzarim corridors.

It is crucial for the resistance to continue strengthening its operational capacity while intensifying diplomatic efforts to thwart any Israeli attempts to impose a new order in Gaza. Fostering national unity and maintaining popular support among Palestinians is essential to confronting these threats.

Ultimately, the Palestinian resistance remains a key factor in scuttling Israeli plans to permanently occupy and govern Gaza. No settlement or military strategy will succeed as long as Palestinians remain fully committed to their land and rights.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israels-new-pasha-of-gaza

US naval forces cannot remain to protect Israel 'forever': Washington

The warning comes as the US military is preparing for a collapse in the Gaza ceasefire negotiations between Hamas and Israel

News Desk

SEP 6, 2024

Image
USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier refuels from the underway replenishment oiler USNS Laramie in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, October 11, 2023. (Photo credit: US Navy photo via AP)

Washington has warned Tel Aviv that US naval forces cannot indefinitely be deployed to the West Asia region to protect Israel, Channel 13 reported on 6 September, amid continued fear of an expanded war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The Israeli news channel reported a message was sent to Israel that tensions with Hezbollah and Iran need to be reduced at some stage because “the [US] aircraft carriers will not be able to stay in the area forever.”

Fear of a full-scale regional war spiked after Israel assassinated top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut and Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in late July.

Hezbollah retaliated against the assassination in part by launching a large-scale missile and drone attack on targets in northern Israel on 25 August.

The next day, the US Department of Defense said the deployment of two US aircraft carrier strike groups in West Asia had been extended.

In announcing the decision, US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin emphasized the steadfast commitment of the US to supporting Israel against threats from Iran and Hezbollah.

The Theodore Roosevelt carrier had arrived in the region in early July, while carrier Abraham Lincoln arrived in mid-August.

The Theodore Roosevelt replaced the Dwight D Eisenhower carrier after its deployment to the region was extended repeatedly earlier this summer.

Iran has yet to retaliate for the assassination of Hamas official Haniyeh in Tehran amid ongoing negotiations between Israel and Hamas for a Gaza ceasefire and prisoner exchange.

Negotiations continue to stall due to efforts by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to block a ceasefire deal. Netanyahu continues to insist that Israeli troops keep a long-term occupation of the Philadelphi corridor on the Gaza–Egypt border and a right to continue the war after a prisoner swap.

On Friday, the Financial Times (FT) reported that the US military is preparing for the possible collapse of the talks.

General CQ Brown, chair of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, stated that “ think about … [if] the talks stall or completely stop, how that impacts the tension in the region and the things we need to do to be prepared should that change.”

General Brown said he is weighing how regional actors would respond to the failure of the talks “and whether they increase any type of their activity, which potentially goes down a path of miscalculation and causes … the conflict to broaden.”

With no deal between Israel and Hamas in sight, the families of soldiers with dual Israeli-US citizenship being held by Hamas have pressed the White House to seriously consider cutting a unilateral deal with the Palestinian resistance movement to win their release. The option is currently under discussion among White House officials, according to five people familiar with the talks speaking with NBC News.

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-naval- ... washington
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sat Sep 07, 2024 11:56 am

‘Israel’ Escalates Detention of Palestinian Women in West Bank
September 5, 2024

Image

By Fayha’ Shalash – Sep 5, 2024

Human rights organizations constantly reveal the horrors of Israeli policies, including the arrest of Palestinian women and the violation of their most basic rights, making this the most difficult year they have ever faced.

The family of detainee Layan Nasser, 24, from Ramallah, has been following every news related to Israeli prison conditions since the re-detainment of their daughter five months ago.

The recent increase in the arrest of Palestinian women by the Israeli army shows disregard for their special circumstances.

Among the female detainees are sick elderly women, mothers and pregnant women, and those wounded by bullets. The detainments target school teachers, journalists, social activists, and former detainees as well.

According to the Addameer Foundation for Prisoner Care and Human Rights, the number of female detainees is currently 88, excluding the number of female detainees from the Gaza Strip, which remains unknown.

‘Our cherished daughter’
Layan was detained for two months in 2021. She was studying nutrition at Birzeit University. She was released under conditions, including continued appearances before the Israeli courts.

On April 7, an Israeli military force stormed her home at Birzeit, north of Ramallah, and detained her again, despite her commitment to appearing before the courts for three years.

Her father, Sami Nasser, told Al Mayadeen English that her arrest was surprising, especially since she graduated and began working. Then, she was transferred to administrative detention without any charges, and her detention was renewed immediately after it ended, without any trial being held.

Layan, the youngest in the family alongside her twin brother Basil, was very special to her parents being their only daughter among two sons. Despite her age, she behaved with great responsibility and helped every member of the family as much as she could.

“She has a lot of positive energy and a strong personality. She doesn’t hesitate to help anyone. Her absence created a huge void in the house, and her usual smile was sorely missed. We wait for her every day to come back to us,” her father said emotionally.

In light of the harsh conditions that “Israel” imposes on Palestinian detainees and prisoners, alongside its aggression on the Gaza Strip since last October, Layan’s family fears that she may suffer from malnutrition, lack of medical treatment, or even the slightest punishment.

Sami expressed his anguish, saying, “We cannot fathom the idea of Layan enduring any psychological or physical harm or torture. When they arrested her, they tied her hands tightly and blindfolded her right in front of us. She’s our cherished child. How can they treat her this way?”



Sad stories
Journalist Ikhlas Sawalha, 25, from Jenin, is still trying to recover from her nine-month detention, as she was released on August 8.

Not a day passes without remembering the female detainees she left behind to suffer in prison, enduring the repeated oppression by the prison guards.

Damon is the main prison for Palestinian female detainees. However, in the aftermath of the aggression on the Gaza Strip, human rights organizations have expressed doubts about the existence of secret prisons specifically for female detainees from the Gaza Strip.

Sawalha told Al Mayadeen English that she was arrested at a military checkpoint in the northern West Bank on December 12. She was pushed to the ground, tied up, and kept in the freezing cold for hours.

Then, she was transferred to Hasharon Prison, which serves as a transfer station for female detainees. There, she was subjected to harsh beatings during the strip search she was forced to undergo, despite its cruelty.

A few days later, Sawalha was transferred to administrative detention. She longed to know what she was accused of and why she had been detained. Her thoughts were also consumed by worry for her husband, who was imprisoned as well.

“Each one of the prisoners had a sad story,” she added. “One was five months pregnant and feared giving birth in prison. Another had a bullet wound in her leg and required constant medical care. An elderly woman needed medication for diabetes, and yet another was in solitary confinement.”

According to her description, nutrition is very poor, and it sometimes only consists of lentils and barley. Additionally, water and electricity are constantly cut off.

“Medical care is non-existent, and female prisoners are not receiving any medical examinations even if they request them. There is constant repression, such as throwing tear gas bombs into the prisoners’ rooms for even the slightest reason,” Ikhlas explained.

Female detainees from the Gaza Strip were sometimes brought to Damon prison in miserable conditions, bound and forced to take off the hijab and wear army uniforms. They were subjected to rape, sexual harassment, torture, and brutal beatings.

The prison administration didn’t allow female detainees from the West Bank to mix with those from Gaza, except on very rare occasions. They would only have brief moments together during the half hour they are allowed in the prison yard.

The most difficult year
Human rights organizations constantly reveal the horrors of Israeli policies, including the arrest of Palestinian women and the violation of their most basic rights, making this the most difficult year they have ever faced.

Amani al-Sarahneh, the media spokeswoman for the Palestinian Prisoners Society, informed us that “Israel” systematically escalated its arrest operations against Palestinian women after October 7 and didn’t exclude minors. This included taking women hostage to pressure a family member into surrendering.

Sexual assaults were carried out against female detainees, including harassment, strip searches, and threats of rape.

“Today, female detainees are subjected to a starvation policy: They are deprived of obtaining additional food items sold at the canteen and of medical care,” she added.

The overcrowding situation imposed by the prison administration has also placed a heavy burden on female detainees. This policy has led to many tragic conditions of detention: They are sometimes compelled to sleep on the floor, suffer from a severe shortage of clothes and blankets, and endure the deliberate provision of undrinkable and dirty water by the prison administration.

https://orinocotribune.com/israel-escal ... west-bank/

******

Israel’s energy insecurity: How blackouts could paralyze the occupation state

Israel regularly threatens to ‘bomb Lebanon back to the stone age.’ But in any full-scale war, it is the occupation state’s energy infrastructure that will likely collapse first – a catastrophe for Israelis who have never known blackouts and shortages.


Stasa Salacanin

SEP 6, 2024

Image
(Photo Credit: The Cradle)

As clashes on Lebanon’s border and the potential for war with Hezbollah intensify, Israel grows more concerned over its vulnerability to energy supply shortages and power grid security. With ceasefire negotiations heading nowhere, many experts and Israeli insiders believe that energy security may end up becoming the occupation state’s Achilles heel.

Lessons learned from Ukraine show just how challenging it remains to protect energy infrastructure during a hot conflict. Despite Israel’s “advanced” air defenses, the occupation state’s energy system remains highly vulnerable to attacks. This was made evident earlier this year when power outages affected areas in Tel Aviv, Petah Tikva, and Beersheba, leaving thousands without electricity.

Concerns were further heightened when Shaul Goldstein, a senior state electricity official, admitted that Israel’s energy sector is unprepared for a major war. He warned that in a war with Hezbollah, Israel’s power infrastructure could suffer severe disruptions.

His blunt statement – “after 72 hours without electricity, it will be impossible to live here” – sparked a wave of public anxiety. Although Energy Minister Eli Cohen and Israel Electric Corporation’s CEO Meir Spiegler criticized Goldstein’s comments, they nonetheless raised alarm among both officials and citizens. As a result, many Israelis have been panic-buying diesel generators in anticipation of future outages.

While both Hezbollah and the Israeli military appear keen to avoid wider direct conflict – as it would almost certainly draw in allies from both sides – tensions remain very high. The situation escalated after Israel’s April attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus, followed by Iran’s missile and drone retaliation, and then more recently following Israel’s assassinations of top Hezbollah and Hamas officials. Though responses to Israeli aggressions are calculated to minimize damage, the risk of miscalculation looms large, threatening to spark a more destructive war.

Hezbollah’s message to Tel Aviv

In June, Hezbollah released a video, reportedly captured by a drone breaching Israeli airspace, revealing sensitive infrastructure and energy sites in and around the port city of Haifa. Hezbollah’s Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah warned that the Lebanese resistance would fight “without constraints, rules, or limits” if war were imposed on the country. Speaking to The Cradle, veteran global energy expert Cyril Widdershoven says:

If a full-scale confrontation starts between Hezbollah/Iran and Israel, for sure, the Israeli energy grid/system will be targeted. How far Hezbollah will be able to hit the system to bring Israel to its knees is unknown. But looking at the yearlong preparations of the Israeli army, airforce, and navy, measures have been taken to counter this or even pre-emptively take out Hezbollah/Iranian capabilities for sure.

Nevertheless, the war in Ukraine has demonstrated that even the most sophisticated air defenses – whether western or Russian ones – cannot fully shield energy systems from attacks. Long-range drones, in particular, have proven devastating, and Hezbollah is believed to possess a formidable arsenal of precision-guided missiles, drones, and torpedoes capable of striking deep into Israeli territory.

According to a study by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Hezbollah’s stockpile includes between 120,000 and 200,000 short- to intermediate-range missiles and rockets. Israel’s Defense Ministry estimates the country could face up to 5,000 rocket strikes per day in a major conflict.

Despite Tel Aviv’s awareness of these risks, a study published in June by the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) suggests that “immediate priority would likely be given to “protecting military assets rather than infrastructure such as electricity for civilians.”

Moreover, Hezbollah and its allies in the Axis of Resistance also possess a substantial arsenal of drones, which have been successfully used in Yemen as well as in Ukraine.

Iranian Shahed drones, which Hezbollah uses under the name Ayoub, are inexpensive to produce and, according to Russian sources, cost around $50,000. As Tehran has the largest ballistic missile arsenal in West Asia, any strategic strikes on Israel could be especially devastating. Security expert Akram Kharief believes it could cost Israel around $20–30 billion to defend itself against a major Iranian attack.

Vulnerability of Israel’s energy sector

Besides vulnerable power grid facilities, attacks on three Israeli offshore gas fields – Leviathan, Tamar, and Karish – that supply most of the state’s power plants are expected. The Tamar field has been temporarily shut down over safety concerns, given its proximity to the embattled Gaza Strip. But as Israel–Hezbollah tensions mount, Israel may be forced to shutter all three fields. In such an event, Israel could switch to diesel and coal power, but those reserves are already limited, and supply chains can be easily disrupted in the Mediterranean, as they have already been in the Red Sea.

Many of Israel’s traditional coal and diesel power plants have been phased out to meet environmental standards, further weakening the country’s energy security. The centralized nature of Israel’s power grid has proven problematic, as seen throughout Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, with some areas enduring prolonged blackouts due to slow repairs, with similar problems appearing later in the restive north.

There’s also the potential for oil supply disruptions. During the 2006 Lebanon War, foreign tankers refused to dock at Israeli ports due to insurance concerns, and a similar situation could arise if Hezbollah targets Israeli infrastructure again. Additionally, Israel’s oil imports, mainly from Azerbaijan through Turkish pipelines, could be jeopardized in the event that Turkiye’s political stance shifts.

Widdershoven warns, however, that if all of the above happens, an all-out war would be all but guaranteed:

A lack of Israeli gas production will hit Egypt, too, and Jordan. Expect some Egyptian–Jordanian military actions too, not against Israel, but against Hezbollah–Iran–Hamas. Without Israeli gas, the lights are out in Cairo and Amman, too.

Blackouts amid civil unrest

Indeed, almost three-quarters of Israeli gas production at Leviathan is sent via pipeline to Egypt and the rest to Jordan, with almost 70 percent of Jordanian consumption supplied by Israel.

In a worst-case scenario, analysts warn that the short-term outlook for Israel’s energy sector, particularly its electricity supply, is bleak. Strengthening the grid’s security would take several years and require costly infrastructure investments.

This raises concerns about the impact on Israel’s wider population, which, unlike the Palestinians, are unaccustomed to blackouts and energy shortages. This isn’t even taking into account the domestic political turmoil currently enveloping the occupation state, as Israel’s most extremist government fails to reach a ceasefire agreement with Hamas.

While such disruptions would undoubtedly affect morale, Widdershoven argues that widespread demoralization among Israelis during a war is unlikely. Instead, he believes that attacks from Hezbollah, Iran, or Hamas would harden public support for their defeat, with many Israelis already backing the war in Gaza. But neither time nor the ability to repair damaged infrastructure is on Israel’s side, and any delay in addressing its broad infrastructural vulnerabilities will prove costly.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israels-e ... tion-state

Gaza officials reveal 70 percent of Palestinians killed by Israel are women, children

Around 3,556 massacres have been committed by Israeli forces in 11 months, constituting an average of 10 massacres daily since the war began

News Desk

SEP 6, 2024

Image
(Photo credit: AA)

The majority of the victims of Israel’s war on Gaza have been women and children, according to data released by the strip’s Government Media Office on 5 September.

The data reveals that “69 percent of the victims are children and women.” The number of dead children alone stands at 16,715, while the number of women killed stands at 11,308.

Marking “335 days of the genocide,” the media office highlighted that 3,556 massacres have been committed by the Israeli army against Palestinians in Gaza since the start of the war.

The overall death toll now stands at 40,878, while another 10,000 are missing, either still under the rubble or in Israeli detention.

The media office statement adds that nearly 1,000 medical workers and civil defense workers have been killed by Israeli forces. The number of journalists killed is now 172.

Additionally, seven mass graves have been found inside hospitals in the Gaza Strip.

Over 170 displacement shelters have been bombed, and 200 government buildings and 123 schools and universities have been destroyed.

At least 280,000 housing units have been targeted or destroyed by the Israeli army. Over 80,000 tons of explosives have been dropped on the besieged strip.

The media offices added that two million Palestinians have been displaced.

Over 30 Palestinians have starved to death, according to the statement.

The data came out shortly after UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric warned that the “humanitarian situation in Gaza remains beyond catastrophic.” He added that there has been a 35 percent decrease in cooked meals provided to those in need.

“This is in part attributed to the multiple evacuation orders that were issued by the Israeli security forces, with at least 70 kitchens forced to either suspend cooked meals provision or relocate.”

He also said over one million Palestinians in central and southern Gaza did not receive any food rations in August.

At least a dozen Palestinians were killed by Israel across Gaza on 6 September, including in Rafah and Gaza City’s Al-Zaytoun neighborhood.

“Civil defense teams also recovered bodies from the rubble of a house in the Sabra neighborhood, south of Gaza City, and efforts were underway to locate additional missing individuals,” WAFA news agency reported.

https://thecradle.co/articles/gaza-offi ... n-children

******

Is ‘Israel’ Using Small Nuclear Weapons in Gaza and South Lebanon?
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 6, 2024
Robert Daly and Christopher Busby

Image

Dr. Christopher Busby is part a mixed crew of investigative reporters and commentators from Lebanon and some film-makers investigating “Israel’s” use of enriched uranium in strikes on Gaza on Lebanon, and aim to follow up on the strange illnesses that are appearing on the battlefield.

Dr. Robert Daly

The American Peace Information Council (APIC) and Green Audit (UK) are conducting an investigation of “Israel’s” possible use of small nuclear weapons in Gaza and South Lebanon. Dr. Christopher Busby—Scientific Secretary, European Committee on Radiation Risk; once Member, UK Committee Examining Radiation Risk from Internal Emitters; once Member, UK Ministry of Defence Depleted Uranium Oversight Board—presents the scientific and social background of the case below.

APIC and Green Audit ask people who drive ambulances down in the South, or live there, to come forward with engine air filters from ambulances driven in bombed areas, samples of long hair (at least 10 cm in length) if they live in bombed areas, and Geiger counter readings and soil samples from bomb craters. Please send these samples and evidence to Al Mayadeen who will forward them to us. One would think that the easiest way to obtain ambulance air filters would be from the Lebanese Red Cross, but its General Secretary, Mr. Georges Kitanneh, refuses to assist this investigation.

‘Israel’ in Gaza: Red Mercury
Dr. Christopher Busby

In 2021, a scientific report in the prestigious journal Nature confirmed what I had been saying since 2006. “Israel” has, since its attacks on Lebanon in 2006 and those on Gaza in 2008 and 2014, used a new nuclear weapon, one which kills with a high temperature radiation flash and with neutrons. This weapon, which leaves an identification footprint, but no fission products like Caesium-137, we now know was also employed by the USA in Fallujah, Iraq in 2003, and previously in Kosovo also.

The residues, inhalable Uranium aerosol dust, together with the neutron damage to tissues, cause a range of serious and often fatal health effects that puzzle doctors and defy treatment. Without knowing what caused such effects, which often mimic other illnesses or result in fungal infections that kill, doctors are powerless to help and just watch the exposed individuals die.

In the cases of direct exposures to the flash, parts of the body, arms, legs, places that were not behind significant shielding are burned to blackened sticks. The aerosol Uranium dust is inhaled, destroys the lungs through fibrosis, is translocated to the lymphatic system, and later causes cancers, not only lymphomas and leukemias, but pretty much any cancer as a result of localisation of the Uranium particle in the organ, for example the breast, which has extensive lymphatic vessels. If the particle is coughed up and swallowed, it can end up immobilised in the colon and cause cancer there.

Downstream results in exposed populations include genetic effects, unexplained infant mortality, congenital malformations, miscarriages, sex ratio perturbations at birth, and fertility loss, all of which were found in epidemiological studies I helped carry out in Fallujah from 2010-2011.

This is not science fiction or arm-waving. I have acted as an expert witness in two successful legal cases, one in England and one in Australia, where the judge and coroner court concluded that the particles caused colon cancer. I am helping a US DU veteran at the moment in his case against the military. He has a pituitary tumour (the small gland is located behind the nose where the particles lodge).

I began this investigation in 2006 when an article appeared in a Lebanese newspaper reporting that an Israeli bomb crater in Khiam was radioactive. A Dr. Ali Khobeisi had taken a Geiger counter to the crater and found a 20-times background radiation level in the crater relative to nearby. By 2006, I had become something of an alternative authority on Depleted Uranium weapons (DU). I had given evidence to the US Congressional Committee on Veterans Affairs on the effects of DU and Gulf War syndrome, I had visited Iraq and also Kosovo, and I was a member of the UK government Depleted Uranium Oversight Board (DUOB); I had written articles, including for the United Nations, I had given evidence to the Royal Society.

I asked a colleague to go to Lebanon and get samples from the crater, and also an ambulance air filter. When they were analysed, using two separate methods, they showed the presence not of Depleted Uranium, but of Enriched Uranium (EU). Now this is impossible, unless the weapon was made from EU or created EU from neutron irradiation of U-234 and U-238.

To follow the explanation of the problem, you need some science. Natural Uranium, as mined, has three isotopes, U-238 U-234 and U-235. Most of this Uranium by mass is U-238 (99.7%). The 0.3% of U-235 is important for nuclear bombs and nuclear energy and is extracted in various ways to make EU. What is left behind is less radioactive U-238, and this is what is termed Depleted Uranium (DU).

When U-238 decays, it changes into Thorium-234, which rapidly changes into Protoactinium-234 and this turns into Uranium-234. Then you get a long list of progeny, but these do not concern us. All this happens quite quickly, and the process releases some gamma rays which make DU a gamma radiation hazard, contrary to the statements of the military that DU is not a handling hazard. It is. But this is not important in this story.

The main issue here is this. Was the enriched Uranium in the Lebanon bomb a real finding? Could it have been a laboratory error? The answer is No. We used two different laboratories and two different Uranium analysis methods, ICPMS and alpha spectrometry.

What we found was picked up by the reporter Robert Fisk, who put the story into The Independent in October 2006: The Mystery of “Israel’s” Secret Uranium Bomb.

Until we found EU, I had focused on the health effects of DU. Everyone did. But in 2006 I was contacted by an eminent Italian nuclear physicist, Emilio Del Guidice. I met him in London, where he told me that the source of the EU was a new weapon which used Hydrogen or heavy hydrogen, Deuterium dissolved in Uranium and when this warhead, as small as a baseball, was fired at a solid object, the hydrogen suffered Cold Fusion to form Helium with the emission of a powerful gamma ray which cause the U238 to convert to an unstable U-239 which decayed to U-235 and a neutron.

I am not a nuclear physicist, though I have my own ideas about this explanation but at that time I accepted that he knew what he was talking about. At least it explained the source of the enrichment.

In 2008 I was approached by some doctors in Egypt who wondered if the Israelis were bombing Gaza with DU. With some difficulty, I obtained samples from Gaza, again soil samples and an air filter, and analysis showed the presence of EU. In 2010, as part of our study of the congenital malformations in Fallujah, we analysed the hair of the mothers for 52 elements to try and identify the cause of the birth defects. We found EU in the mothers’ hair.

Further support for the existence of an EU-containing or EU-producing weapon came from a study of a Kosovo war Veteran whose mysterious illnesses were investigated thoroughly by some doctors in Liverpool and Manchester. The man’s kidneys contained Enriched Uranium.

Emilio del Guidice had not stood still in this Sherlock Holmes investigation. Together with reporters from Italian TV (Rai News) he had visited the father of Cold Fusion, Prof Martin Fleischmann, whom I had also previously worked with when I was at the University of Kent in 1980. Fleishmann added to the intriguing scientific puzzle, but was unwilling to get involved. It seemed that scientists looking at cold fusion were dying under suspicious circumstances. Fleischmann himself had seemingly been poisoned with something that caused multi-site cancer and passed away on August 3, 2012. A cold fusion colleague developed the same multi-site cancer and didn’t survive.

Del Guidice and the Rai News producer following up the story wrote a book: The Secret of the Three Bullets, published in 2014. It is still in print and contains their side of the story. I am in the book under various names. But a few months before its publication, del Guidice unexpectedly died when alone in his house. I am told that the Rai News co-author editor of the book, Maurizio Torrealta has gone into hiding after having been posted three real bullets in an envelope.

Fast forward to 2021. The Nature paper gave the results of analyses of 65 samples of soil, sand, cement, and building materials from Gaza. Using gamma spectrometry (where you use the whole sample and look at the identifiable peaks from U-235 and Th-234 = U238) the authors identified some significantly high levels of Enriched Uranium in all the samples, but mostly in the soil samples. The levels of enrichment had become greater than those that we found in our earlier studies. The natural isotope mass ratio in nature (U238/U235) is 138. In Lebanon we found 116. In Gaza 108. The 2021 paper found about 85. Since this was before the recent bombing, this contamination must date to the 2014 Israeli bombing. What should we expect to find now?

In March of this year, I wrote to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the official UN watchdogs for the use of nuclear weapons. My colleague from Fallujah, Dr. Mohamad Al-Darraji also sent my letter under his name. Nothing happened. No reply. He was to organise a Press Conference in Vienna to draw attention to the use of this weapon in Fallujah, and the cover up of the residual high levels of radiation by the Iraqi Ministry of Science. I made a video to be presented at this conference (it is online). But he couldn’t get a venue.

I followed the letter up with a second version in July, demanding that the IAEA respond. I wrote a paper about the issue and submitted it to two journals, putting the pre-print online. It was rejected on the basis that the reviewers didn’t believe the Nature analysis results. Eventually, Al-Darraji got a reply from the IAEA (naturally, I didn’t). The IAEA didn’t believe the Nature results. Nothing to investigate. No problem.

The UK Green Party House of Lords member, Baroness Jenny Jones (who I know) asked a question in UK Parliament. The government said they didn’t have anything to say about it. About the high level of Enriched Uranium in Gaza.

So that’s it. What can we do? “Israel” and the USA (at least) have developed what is almost certainly a mini-neutron bomb. “Israel” is using it in Gaza. And may be using it in Lebanon (again). In fact, there is evidence for the development of such a bomb having been tested as long ago as October 1962, in the final US atmospheric test in the Dominic series in the Pacific. This was the test named “Housatonic” which achieved 9.96Mt yield but reportedly had zero fallout. That means it had no fission primer in the first stage, a necessary requirement for all the hydrogen bombs before it.

The significance of this appears to have been overlooked, but, astonishingly, you can find details on Wikipedia. The UK government put all that stuff under the Official Secrets Act and when I was representing the Test Veterans in the Royal Courts of Justice from 2010 to 2016, I was refused access to these details. The new bomb was successfully detonated just before the Kennedy Kruschev test ban, and just before Kennedy was assassinated. Could there be a link?

I have joined a mixed crew of investigative reporters and commentators from Lebanon and some film-makers to seek out the solution to this conundrum. We aim to follow up on the strange illnesses that are appearing on the battlefield. We aim to look for Enriched Uranium and also neutron activation products like Cobalt-60, Tritium and Carbon-14. In a new development, the laboratories that I used to examine the earlier samples have all suddenly closed their doors. One of them was shut down altogether after the first Gaza analysis. One of them was threatened. But we can do a lot with what we have.

What we want is for people to obtain Geiger Counters to check out the impact sites soon after the explosion, and if it is radioactive to get us samples of dust and dirt. We want women’s hair samples, especially long hair, cut from the nape of the neck, from women who were near or lived in areas that were bombed. You can buy a simple Geiger Counter now for about 60 euros. You can even get a low-resolution portable gamma spectrometer for about 350 euros.

We would like anyone with comments or information to contact us. This is a big deal.

The weapon will certainly be used in future exchanges, and will make local nuclear war possible, since the scary scenarios involving fallout may not materialise. I have named the device Red Mercury because that is what it probably is (remember the red mercury story: written off officially by science (haha) as a fraud, as a phony). Red Mercury was Stalin’s code for Enriched Uranium. Clearly, from the Dominic Housatonic test, the USA also developed the weapon. Since it kills without leaving fission products, it is invisible to the global nuclear explosion detection systems and the IAEA watchdogs.

But there is no doubt the IAEA know about it. Their latest report on Uranium in the Environment completely ignores Enriched Uranium. When I asked one of the report authors why, I was told they were short of money. They only had enough to look at Depleted Uranium. Can you believe this stuff?



https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... h-lebanon/

Food Sovereignty in a Palestinian Economy of Resistance
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 6, 2024
Fathi Nimer

Image

Summary

Palestinian farmers have always been on the frontlines of resistance and continue to defy settler encroachment.
Oslo and its accompanying treaties slowly dismantled the popular structures created through anti-colonial organizing with the new pretext of “state-building.”
The failure of the PA to challenge decades of de-development induced by the Israeli regime has left the Palestinian economy heavily segmented, characterized by high levels of unemployment.
The mainstream approach to food security has traditionally focused on providing access to food through trade or food aid. This model tends to ignore the power dynamics that mediate food access.
The notion of food sovereignty arose from a need to rethink the food security paradigm and address its shortcomings in the Global South.
Food sovereignty is understood as “the right of Peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems.”
Food sovereignty can provide an alternative source of livelihood, which means more space for resistance and to act without fear of hunger.
A successful shift to food sovereignty cannot be separated from a broader socio-political movement encouraging Palestinians to support their farmers, even when the price is relatively higher.
The Palestinian community should take concrete steps to recenter food sovereignty—including creating a food sovereignty fund, developing trade and solidarity networks with Palestinian farmers, broadening boycotts of Israeli goods, investing in agrotechnology, and strengthening popular education on agroecology.
Introduction

In their struggle against Zionist settler colonialism, Palestinians have long worked towards establishing a resistance economy. Understood as a form of popular organizing such that economic institutions and activities serve the political aims of the Palestinian struggle, the notion of a resistance economy emerged organically during the early decades of the liberation struggle and later became a central pillar of the First Intifada. During this time, economic autonomy was regarded as a means to sustain the anti-colonial struggle.

Today, food sovereignty constitutes a natural continuation of such modes of resistance, building upon the principles of agricultural self-sufficiency practiced throughout the history of the Palestinian revolution. Accordingly, this policy brief traces the origins of food sovereignty and the challenges Palestinians face to effectively put the framework into practice. The brief argues that doing so will help better recontextualize the resistance economy today, thus paving the way for establishing a more contentious economic order.

Agriculture and the Resistance Economy: Past and Present

For Indigenous people resisting settler colonialism, control over land often means control over life. Palestinian farmers have always been on the frontlines of resistance and continue to defy settler encroachment.

Agriculture—specifically, agricultural cooperatives—was historically a core component of the Palestinian resistance economy. This mode of production faced a tremendous setback during the Nakba, with the loss of most Palestinian lands and the ethnic cleansing of nearly one million Palestinians. Consequently, agricultural cooperatives dropped by 87% within a few years of the Nakba. While they have never fully recovered, Palestinian farmers have made notable efforts to sustain agriculture as a key component of economic resistance.

One such example is the “victory gardens” of the First Intifada. These gardens were grassroots initiatives focused on small-scale agriculture at the household and neighborhood levels. Cooperatives, such as “The Shed,” also emerged during this period. Based in Beit Sahour, the Shed provided seeds, tools, and insecticide at cost to Palestinians in the surrounding areas. As a result of these and similar projects, it is estimated that over 500,000 trees were planted across Palestine between 1987 and 1989. At the time, Yitzhak Rabin was so infuriated by these efforts that he instructed the army to impose curfews on Palestinian villages during harvest times so that their crops would rot in the field.

While agriculture’s economic role was crucial to the Palestinian resistance economy, its political and social dimensions should not be overlooked. These projects carried with them a rejection of the colonial condition. The communal emphasis on household and neighborhood production helped nurture collective and popular participation and solidarity. Despite some challenges and setbacks, this production and consumption model successfully drew engagement from wide segments of society.

Settler Colonialism and De-Development

Colonial authorities also understood the link between economics and politics. From its inception, the Zionist settler enterprise sought to expropriate Palestinian land and resources and render Palestinians dependent on the Israeli economy. General Moshe Dayan once commented that controlling infrastructure and utilities is more effective than “a thousand curfews and riot-dispersals.”

One way that Israel has sought to achieve this dependency is through the process of de-development. Prior to the signing of the Oslo Agreement, the Israeli regime pursued de-development through the fragmentation and isolation of Palestinian population centers and the expropriation of their lands and resources. After Oslo, these policies continued with an added layer: the Protocol on Economic Relations (Paris Protocol), which institutionalized de-development under the guise of “transitional negotiated agreements.” The protocol included the devastating, one-sided customs union, as well as bodies such as the “Joint Water Committee,” which continues to divert fresh water to illegal settlers and hold Palestinians hostage to a system of racist military permits to this day. The Paris Protocol was a formalization of the same colonial systems of expropriation that existed prior but now came coated with a sheen of legitimacy, rubber-stamped by the supposed representatives of the Palestinian people. It was the selling of domination as cooperation.

Oslo and its accompanying treaties slowly dismantled the popular structures created through anti-colonial organizing with the new pretext of “state-building.” Today, the Palestinian Authority (PA) dedicates less than 1% of its budget to agriculture. Economic development has long since been decoupled from any emancipatory political program and now serves as a litmus test to prove to the international community that Palestinians are “ready” for statehood.

The failure of the PA to challenge decades of de-development induced by the Israeli regime has left the Palestinian economy heavily segmented, characterized by high levels of unemployment, especially among the youth, with levels reaching as high as 48%. The stagnant job market, the Israeli settler-colonial restrictions, and the atomization of Palestinian urban centers have made working in Israeli settlements and in the 1948 lands one of the only remaining options for Palestinians to feed their families. As much as 10% of the Palestinian workforce in the West Bank depends on labor in illegal colonies and in the colonial economy more broadly.

All imports and exports are dependent on the Israeli regime’s whims, while movement restrictions cost the Palestinian economy an estimated $274 million and 60 million working hours annually. Vast fertile lands are cordoned off for settlement expansion; most Palestinian farmers struggle to reach their lands and do not have the resources to develop them. Combined with the PA’s neglect of this sector, these factors have contributed to agriculture’s gradual erosion and abandonment, which has declined from 53% of GDP in 1967 to less than 7% in 2021.

The majority of those who still practice farming today do so as a secondary activity. Barely 26% of Palestinian farmers report farming as their main income-generating activity. Farming land has gradually shrunk and become more fragmented. Between 2004 and 2010, the average agricultural landholding dropped from 18.6 dunums to 10.8—a 42% decrease over just six years. Three-quarters of agricultural holdings in Palestine are less than 10 dunums; however, they make up only 20% of farming land. Hence, extreme contrast defines agriculture in Palestine—a sector caught between the smallholder majority, growing for subsistence, and the for-profit minority that controls most of the land.

Food Security Under De-Development

Globally, the mainstream approach to achieving food security is based on the 1996 Rome declaration and has traditionally focused on providing access to food, mostly through trade or food aid. This model, however, tends to ignore the power dynamics that mediate food access. Critically, reliance on trade makes Palestinians vulnerable to exogenous shocks. The initial years of the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted this risk, when the disruption of international trade and food imports exacerbated food insecurity. The economy’s shutdown caused many to lose their income and, consequently, the ability to afford food. Food security also brings with it the risk of dependency on the whims of the international community and its stipulations.

In a context where Israeli settler colonialism polices every action, the mainstream food security paradigm is simply inadequate. For instance, donor states championed the Amoro mushroom farm in the West Bank as an example of innovative entrepreneurial thinking to alleviate Palestinian economic woes. But while the farm sought to break the monopoly of Israeli mushrooms in the Palestinian market, the Israeli response was swift. Indeed, Israeli forces threatened grocers who switched to the Palestinian product and purposefully delayed the delivery of the imported spores needed to grow the mushrooms at its port until they expired. This suppression effectively shut down the farm’s production, ending the project.

In Gaza, the Israeli regime has historically dictated everything that may enter the besieged strip. Using herbicidal warfare, Israel likewise determines how much food Palestinians in Gaza are allowed to produce by making large swaths of agricultural land unusable. Even more dire, the genocide unfolding since October 7th, 2023, shows that the Israeli regime has been actively using thirst and mass starvation as a weapon of war against Palestinians. These actions can only be understood as an attack on the infrastructure of Palestinian life itself.

Meanwhile, in the West Bank, whatever illusion of economic stability offered in return for obedience has been dispelled since October 2023, with the closure and isolation of cities and revocation of work permits within 1948 Palestine, as well as withholding PA tax returns. These measures underscore the West Bank economy’s vulnerability and severe dependency on Israeli approval.

Food Sovereignty and Palestine

The notion of food sovereignty arose from a need to rethink the food security paradigm and address its shortcomings in the Global South, especially in the context of World Bank and IMF-imposed structural adjustment programs that encouraged the commodification of food. Tracing its origins to agrarian peasant movements in Latin America, food sovereignty is understood as “the right of Peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems.”

A leading voice in the food sovereignty movement is La Via Campesina (The International Peasant Movement), a global coalition including hundreds of peasant groups worldwide that oppose the top-down organization of food production systems and work to reclaim land and resources from the exploitation of capital. La Via Campesina promotes agroecology principles and stresses preserving local ecosystems in lieu of destructive industrial farming practices. Although each country in the peasant movement has its context-specific struggles, they are all threatened by the exploitation of land, labor, and resources. In this context, members from all over the world exchange knowledge and experiences towards achieving food sovereignty.

Importantly, food sovereignty as a concept is broader than food security. It centers on small-scale farmers and seeks to build sustainable local food production. In contrast to the food security paradigm, this approach focuses on reclaiming land and resources, creating communally organized production, and building the infrastructure needed to support a resistance economy. This perspective starkly contrasts with the cash-crop export orientation strategy currently employed, in which impoverished and hungry Palestinians are encouraged to grow flowers to export to European markets instead of achieving a basic level of self-sufficiency.

Palestinian farmers have embraced the movement: Palestine is notably the first Arab member of La Via Campesina. This membership was the culmination of decades of work by the Union of Agricultural Work Committees and the Palestinian Agricultural Relief Committees, among other organizations. Their activities and support for agricultural committees in hundreds of villages during the First Intifada helped to solidify resilience among farmers and emphasized the importance of agricultural independence and self-sufficiency.

Towards Food Sovereignty Today

The struggle for food sovereignty in Palestine is a major battlefield against Zionist settler colonialism, as it contains within it multiple facets of social, economic, and political resistance. A Palestinian return to tending land, organized through participatory and collaborative democratic principles, would reduce food insecurity and increase society’s capacity for resistance. It would reaffirm the role of farmers as stewards of the soil and resistance, and the continuous utilization of land would make their confiscation or theft by settlers more difficult.

An additional benefit is that it would make Palestinian communities more resistant to closures. Focusing on local inputs, flora, and fauna means that the endeavors would be more sustainable, enabling them to also blunt the destabilizing impacts of global shocks.

As it stands, Israel and its accomplices have engineered Palestinian livelihood to be heavily dependent on Israeli control and approval. This has the effect of domesticating Palestinians and discouraging any form of resistance through deploying various schemes. For instance, the overwhelming majority of Palestinians in the West Bank now live either in cities or refugee camps, with only 22% remaining in rural areas. These same rural areas provide the largest source of exploitable Palestinian labor within the colonial economy. Necessarily, the move to food sovereignty must contend with the enforced proletarianization of Palestinian farmers. Any advancements will require disentangling Palestinian workers from the grip of Israeli capital— and, consequently, complicit Palestinian capital.

Food sovereignty can provide an alternative source of livelihood, which means more space for resistance and to act without fear of hunger. But this raises uncomfortable questions that Palestinians must be able to answer: Who will cover these costs and bear the burdens of this approach? How will the rest come together to support those who cultivate the land? What sacrifices are Palestinians willing to make to ensure the success of a resistance economy? After all, many abandon their lands and flock to work in the colonial economy because agricultural production, on average, cannot provide a similar income level. This is exacerbated by the dominance of Israeli fruit and vegetables in the Palestinian market, as Israeli control over land, water, resources, and transportation means that Palestinian farmers cannot hope to compete against Israeli products on a pure price-to-price basis.

Thus, a successful shift to food sovereignty cannot be separated from a broader socio-political movement encouraging Palestinians to support their farmers, even when the price is relatively higher. Locally produced food should not be seen as mere sustenance but also as an investment in a more contentious economic order and a step toward a more dignified future. This approach is especially key for strategic crops, such as wheat, which are often cheaper to procure from abroad. Those who can return to the land should be encouraged to do so; those who can’t have a duty to support them and help share their burden, be that through subsidies or collaboration.

Therefore, if food sovereignty is to be the base of a resistance economy, more substantive change beyond consumption habits is required. It necessitates regenerating our relationship with the land and transforming our methods of production and consumption.

Food Sovereignty Under Genocide?

Until October 2023, Gaza was heavily dominated by urban sprawl, with few accessible rural areas available for agriculture. Gaza’s ability to produce 44% of its food in a mostly urban setting was remarkable, as urban environments rarely meet their food or water needs without a large rural countryside, even under normal circumstances. Without the ingenuity of Palestinians in Gaza, such as extracting gas and fertilizer from waste streams and utilizing their rooftops for growing crops, food insecurity within the territory would have been much worse.

Nonetheless, the limits of advocating for a food sovereignty approach while genocide and open warfare continue must be acknowledged. For instance, regenerative agricultural practices that aim to rehabilitate soils and create increased fertility are not able to take root, as Israeli forces routinely bombard the precious few agricultural zones in Gaza. By June 2024, the Israeli genocide had already destroyed 75% of agricultural zones in Gaza. While the destruction of trees and orchards also occurs in the West Bank, the scale of the genocide in Gaza and the wanton destruction has reached unparalleled levels.

Hence, food sovereignty cannot be viewed as a cure-all to counteract every facet of settler colonialism. Rather, its role is to spur the conditions to make resistance and confrontation possible and mitigate the subsequent damage.

Conclusion

Political opportunities can arise when least expected, and challenges to the status quo can ignite widespread change. Palestinians must accordingly lay the groundwork to better support the rise of a resistance economy. We must do so not in mere anticipation of political opportunity, but with the mindset of actively creating these conditions in the present. This need not mean formulating a comprehensive blueprint for a resistance economy; after all, it was only after the First Intifada that the victory gardens emerged. Systemic change at this level will result from a thousand small battles preceding, during, and after the inevitable outbreak of the next Intifada.

Now more than ever, it is critical to our survival as a people to build dual power and food sovereignty to bolster our steadfastness and resistance. History has shown that this change will not come from above and that such endeavors are at odds with the PA’s strategy. Palestinians cannot expect any protection or support from their officials, especially in the face of unprecedented settler aggression. Therefore, we must plan accordingly and collectively on communal and grassroots levels to create the conditions necessary for resistance.

Recommendations

The Palestinian community, including those across colonized Palestine and those in the diaspora, should coordinate to implement the following actions to recenter food sovereignty within a resistance economy:

Create a food sovereignty fund—potentially financed by the Palestinian diaspora—to reduce reliance on foreign aid and help establish agricultural resistance initiatives and projects.
This would have the added benefit of steering development away from a purely entrepreneurial approach, as is often a feature of foreign development aid. The fund would need to be democratically controlled, with the highest levels of transparency. The Palestinian Social Fund could serve as a basic model to build upon.
Support the development of Palestinian trade and solidarity networks connecting Palestinians wherever they are with farmers.
The purchase of goods at a premium price, especially by Palestinians in the diaspora and within the green line, could help facilitate the transfer of wealth to local farmers. Such networks may also help subsidize less profitable yet important strategic crops, such as wheat.
Broaden socially-backed boycotts of Israeli goods, stigmatize consumption of Israeli products, and prioritize purchasing Palestinian products.
Invest in agrotechnology to maximize the efficiency of available resources.
While expanding the land utilized for agriculture is important, studies show that well-maintained and irrigated smallholdings can be up to 28 times more productive (per dunum) than purely rainfed holdings. Given the theft of Palestinian water sources by Zionist settler colonialism, focusing on maximizing the efficiency of the meager available resources could have a more productive effect overall. Simple technologies—such as wicking beds— provide a water-efficient irrigation method and reduce the amount of farming labor. High-density trellising can be used to double or even triple the yields of fruit tree production compared to traditional orchards, in addition to reducing labor, water, land, and fertilizer needs. Such measures require higher establishment costs and special training for farmers, but would be much more resilient and productive in the medium to long-term.
Utilize waste streams that are typically discarded, such as manures and organic and market waste, to produce fertilizers, biogas, or components for animal feed.
Internalize the lessons of peasant movements in the Global South and embrace Indigenous fauna and flora in agricultural endeavors.
For example, animal husbandry in Palestine can be prohibitively costly in terms of water and feed, and the main dairy companies focus exclusively on cow milk. A shift to browsers (camels and goats) instead of cattle could reduce water consumption by up to 50% and feed consumption by up to 35% per liter of milk produced. An additional benefit would be that browsers are more flexible with their feed composition and more resilient than cows if faced with drought or hunger. Furthermore, they produce less manure, reducing their environmental footprint and the chance of tainting groundwater sources.
Educate local populations on agroecology to dispel the notion that it is an imported idea with no practical benefits beyond procuring foreign funding. Work to shift Palestinian mindsets to align with traditional farming principles, promoting a return to the agriculture of our grandparents, who did not rely on imports or environmental destruction.
One ancient Palestinian farming technique that could be revived is using mist to water plants with mist catchers in areas with suitable humidity levels.
Calculate the feasibility of any project involving strategic resources or staple crops, emphasizing strategic or political utility over pure economic performance.
For example, growing our own wheat might be more costly under the current circumstances, but uninterrupted and locally controlled access to its production is crucial for resilience.
Encourage the establishment of stockpiles of strategic goods that are easy to access in case of emergency or blockade.
Encourage the establishment of a comprehensive network of complementary cooperatives to produce, process, and sell food.
Once established, agricultural cooperatives should become active parts of their respective communities and perform a positive social function to attract more Palestinians to this model. They could form a core model to challenge neoliberal economic policy and its focus on individualistic notions of success.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... esistance/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14798
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Sep 08, 2024 12:18 pm

Will ‘Israel’ End on Its Own?
September 6, 2024

Image

By Musa al-Sada – Sep 5, 2024

There is no question that the internal division in the Zionist colony is quite severe. Indeed, history tells us that every colonial settler project is born with an internal spark of discord. The continuation of such a project, in one form or another, relies on the settler community managing its contradictions on one hand, and maintaining sufficient surplus power on the other, specifically economic power and military power. This analysis even extends to interpreting the sharp division in US politics today as, at its core, one of the major contradictions within the white settler bloc, even after more than two centuries of colonizing the continent. It might be useful to view the recent Democratic and Republican national conventions through this lens.

This analysis can be applied to a general reading of all settler-colonial projects. However, naturally, each project has its own unique circumstances and nature, especially the Zionist project. In many ways, the Zionist colony is a unique case from all the projects that preceded it, from the process of assembling and creating a settler society from various parts of the world, to the fact that it represents the culmination of previous Western colonial projects. However, the fundamental idea remains that the fuse for internal discord of the settler community is not an abstract process. It would be incorrect to assume a hypothetical lifespan for the project and that it has an expiration date, with an assumed inevitability that as generations change, it will sicken and die on its own. Rather, what really ignites this fuse (and determines whether this entity will die before its “eighty-year curse” or if it will continue for more than two centuries) are external factors, primarily the resistance of the colonized people.

In other words, passively waiting for the Zionist project to end on its own is misguided. Without escalation [of resistance] and continuous confrontation aimed at its elimination, the project will persist. This settler community has a remarkable ability to rehabilitate itself and manage its internal contradictions, no matter how sharp they appear. They can do this as long as two interrelated factors remain intact: economic stability and security. Any expectation of the project’s self-destruction will collide with this reality.



This particularly concerns the enemy entity, because it is facing a difficult and unique paradox. On one hand, it is an extremely fragile project in regards to its social and demographic structure that is fundamentally composed of diaspora communities and diverse peoples linked together by weak bonds. But at the same time, it is a settler society that enjoys and incredible amount of support from an outside political and economic bloc, that is invested in it and depends on it, namely the West, specifically the United States of America. In other words, while this entity faces blows from Arab resistance movements that threaten its social fabric and material foundations, that intensifies its internal contradictions, a formidable alliance exists—driven by religious and strategic motives and backed by enormous economic resources—stretching from Washington to the Gulf capitals. This alliance is determined to manage these internal tensions, shield the entity even from itself, and provide unwavering economic and moral support. Perhaps one of the most important lessons of this ongoing war is that we should not underestimate how committed this alliance is to preserving the Zionist project and how far it is willing to go in order to do so.

The crux of the idea is that without a real shake-up of the security and economic structure of the entity, any internal social or political contradictions inside the entity are manageable. The settler only leaves for two reasons: fear for his personal security and loss of his economic privilege (Europeans who remain in Namibia and South Africa are an example.) The percentage of those leaving due to their distaste for the ideological form of the state will not represent an end to the colonial project. As for the situation in Palestine, the West Bank will become in the future (and has already begun) an opportunity for liquidating and reaping the enemy’s contradictions between religious Zionism and its secular counterpart, which are the two major umbrellas for the formation of the enemy’s contradictions. While religious Zionism is paying the price on the battlefield today through a proportion of casualties affiliated with it, it has already begun reaping the fruits in Jerusalem and the West Bank. As long as it is able to do so, i.e., control the hills of the West Bank unhindered, this provides a better opportunity for managing the other side of the contradiction with the coastal settlers and the so-called “State of Tel Aviv”, in regards to governance, the state, the judiciary, and others.

This is not to minimize the magnitude of the great rift within the entity. Rather, it is to highlight how the de facto annexation of the West Bank, coupled with the Zionist vision for the future — a blend of forced displacement, encouraged voluntary migration (in collaboration with Gulf states and Jordan), and even a calculated increase in the “Arab minority” — will serve as a means to manage internal Zionist conflicts. This management occurs both internally and through Washington’s role as a mediator like a father caring for its quarreling children. Consequently, the passive analysis that assumes Zionists, along with the current global and regional dynamics, are inevitably leading “Israel” to a perilous demise is deeply flawed. The notion that settlers will simply depart without a fundamental disruption to their security and economic comfort is nothing more than wishful thinking.

A concerted and serious effort is underway by Arab regimes to liquidate the Palestinian cause and normalize relations with “Israel.” Saudi Arabia stands at the forefront of this regional initiative. On the international stage, particularly in the United States, US politicians, Zionists, and Evangelicals remain steadfast in their support. They won’t abandon their religious convictions and strategic interests merely due to the occasional temporary need for air defense mobilization or fleet deployments in the Mediterranean, Gulf of Oman, and Arabian Sea (Yemen’s coasts being the exception.)

History teaches us that no settler colony has ever collapsed of its own accord, regardless of internal strife or even armed conflicts among its factions. The dismantling of such entities and achieving victory over them, demands an unlimited willingness to sacrifice. Put plainly, to achieve the goal of settlers departing the entity en masse requires a committed effort aimed at eradicating the colony itself and physically uprooting it from Palestinian soil. This mindset is the sole path to victory. This conviction is precisely what the strategists of Al-Aqsa Flood believed: that we must courageously and faithfully initiate action without limits in order to eliminate Israel. Otherwise there is an immense and formidable enemy coalition that is determined to safeguard its project, regardless of time or cost. This enemy views even severe disruptions to its strategic environment and heightened regional tensions as mere repetitions of past crises, all of which ultimately shifted in their favor. And this calculation by the enemy is what we must prove wrong.

Featured Image: Israeli police agents arrest a settler during protests in occupied Jaffe on September 2nd, 2024. Photo: Social Media

https://orinocotribune.com/will-israel-end-on-its-own/

*****

Israel: 11 Months of War Have Battered the Country’s Economy
Posted on September 7, 2024 by Yves Smith

This is Naked Capitalism fundraising week. 259 donors have already invested in our efforts to combat corruption and predatory conduct, particularly in the financial realm. Please join us and participate via our donation page, which shows how to give via check, credit card, debit card, PayPal, Clover, or Wise. Read about why we’re doing this fundraiser, what we’ve accomplished in the last year, and our current goal, supporting the commentariat.

Yves here. This post, without giving a time frame, confirms the warning given by former Israeli general Yitzhak Birk, in a Haaretz op ed, that Israel would collapse in no more than a year if the Axis of Resistance kept up its war of attrition against Israel. Birk was referring more to military sustainment and rising internal schisms. But the deteriorating state of the economy is yet another pressure point.

This piece if anything understates where things are headed. First, it does not tease out how the continuing need to keep more soldiers mobilized will weigh on the economy. Second, it does not acknowledge the number of Israelis who have left since the war started, which is an immediate loss of both workers and demand. Keep in mind that many believe that tech workers, whose skills are in high demand, are over-represented among those who’ve departed. It is not clear how many might return. The attraction of Israel was that it enjoyed European living standards and was a supposed safe haven for Jews. If one or both remain in question, many of those who fled may never return.

Third, another source of potentially lasting damage is business closures, which this article explains, not surprisingly, are significant and expected to increase.

Finally, this article skips over a topic covered by some links in our Links feature going live shortly today: that Israel is setting out to wreck what is left of the West Bank’s economy.

By Amr Saber Algarhi, Senior Lecturer in Economics, Sheffield Hallam University and Konstantinos Lagos, Senior Lecturer in Business and Economics, Sheffield Hallam University. Originally published at The Conversation

After 11 months of war, Israel is facing its biggest economic challenge in years. Data shows that Israel’s economy is experiencing the sharpest slowdown among the wealthiest countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Its GDP contracted by 4.1% in the weeks after the October 7 Hamas-led attacks. And the downturn continued into 2024, falling by an additional 1.1% and 1.4% in the first two quarters.

This situation will not have been helped by a nationwide strikeon September 1 that, albeit very briefly, brought the country’s economy to a standstill amid widespread public anger at the government’s handling of the war.

Image

A graph showing the quarterly GDP growth for several OECD countries alongside the OECD average. Israel exhibits the most extreme fluctuation, with a sharp decline between October and December 2023. Amr Saber Algarhi & Konstantinos Lagos / OECD, CC BY-ND

Israel’s economic challenges, of course, pale in comparison to the complete destruction of the economy in Gaza. But the prolonged war is still hurting Israeli finances, business investments and consumer confidence.

Israel’s economy was growing fast before the start of the war, thanks largely to its technology sector. The country’s annual GDP per capita rose by 6.8% in 2021 and 4.8% in 2022, much more than in most western countries.

But things have since changed dramatically. In its July 2024 forecast, the Bank of Israel revised its growth predictions to 1.5% for 2024, down from the 2.8% it had predicted earlier in the year.

With the fighting in Gaza showing no sign of letting up, and the conflict with Hezbollah on the Lebanese border intensifying, the Bank of Israel has estimated that the war’s cost will reach US$67 billion by 2025. Even with a US$14.5 billion military aid packagefrom the US, Israel’s finances may not be enough to cover these expenses.

This means that Israel will face tough choices about how to allocate its resources. It might, for instance, need to cut spending in some areas of the economy or take on more debt. More borrowing will make loan repayments larger and more costly to service in the future.

Israel’s deteriorating fiscal situation has prompted big credit rating agencies to downgrade the country’s status. Fitch loweredIsrael’s credit score from A+ to A in August on the grounds that an increase in its military spending had contributed to a widening of the fiscal deficit to 7.8% of GDP in 2024, up from 4.1% the year before.

It could also potentially jeopardise Israel’s ability to maintain its current military strategy. This strategy, which involves sustained operations in Gaza aimed at destroying Hamas, requires boots on the ground, advanced weaponry and constant logistical support – all of which come at a great financial cost.

Image

Israel’s military expenditure has consistently been the highest in the Middle East region. Amr Saber Alarhi & Konstantinos Lagos / SIPRI Military Expenditure Database, CC BY-NC-ND

Aside from macroeconomic indicators, the war has had a profound impact on specific sectors of Israel’s economy. The construction sector, for example, slowed down by nearly a thirdin the first two months of the war. And agriculture has taken a hit, too, with production down by a quarter in some areas.

Roughly 360,000 reservists were called up at the start of the war – though many have since returned home. More than 120,000 Israeli have been forced from their homes in border areas. And 140,000 Palestinian workers from the West Bank have not been allowed to enter Israel since the October 7 attacks.

The Israeli government has sought to fill the gap by bringing in workers from India and Sri Lanka. However, many key jobs are bound to remain unfilled.

It is estimated that up to 60,000 Israeli companies may have to close in 2024 due to staff shortages, supply chain disruptions and waning business confidence, while many companies are postponing new projects.

Tourism, although not a key part of Israel’s economy, has also been severely affected. Tourist numbers have dropped dramatically since the start of the war, with one in ten hotelsacross the country now facing the prospect of shutting down.

How this War Affects the Wider Region

The war may have battered Israel’s economy. But the effect on the Palestinian economy has been far worse and will take years to repair.

Many Palestinians living in the West Bank have lost their jobs in Israel. And Israel’s decision to hold back most of the tax revenueit collects on behalf of Palestinians has left the Palestinian Authority strapped for cash.

Trade in Gaza has also ground to a halt, which means many Palestinians now rely on aid. While, at the same time, vital communication channels have been cut off and crucial infrastructure has been destroyed.

The effects of the war have stretched beyond just Israel and Palestine. In April, the International Monetary Fund said it expected growth in the Middle East to be “lacklustre” in 2024, at just 2.6%. It cited the uncertainty triggered by the war in Gaza and the threat of a full-blown regional conflict as the reason.

A flare-up in violence in Gaza has inflicted economic damage on an even wider scale than this before. Israel’s bombardment of Gaza in 2008, for example, pushed up the price of oil by nearly 8% and caused concern for markets all over the world.

Israel’s war in Gaza, which is fast approaching its first anniversary, is taking a heavy economic toll. Only a permanent ceasefire can repair the damage and pave the way for recovery in Israel, Palestine and the wider region.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/09 ... onomy.html

******

US activist shot by Israeli forces in West Bank

The shooting occurred while Israeli forces were violently suppressing a weekly protest against an Israeli settlement

September 06, 2024 by Peoples Dispatch

Image
Aysenur Ezgi Eygi was shot dead by Israeli forces (Photo via Wafa)

26-year-old US activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi succumbed to her wounds on Friday after being shot by Israeli forces at a protest in Beita, to the south of Nablus. Headlines from Western mainstream media sources have already attempted to obscure who killed the solidarity activist, with CNN stating “American activist shot dead during protest in West Bank, Palestinian officials say,” CBS News writing, “American woman Aysenur Eygi killed in Israeli-occupied West Bank, US confirms,” and BBC writing. “American activist shot dead in occupied West Bank.”

Hey how’d they die, Matt? Was it magic? Who or what killed Aysenur?

Asking on behalf of Americans who want to know. https://t.co/AX318PBGYC

— Rashida Tlaib (@RashidaTlaib) September 6, 2024

The shooting occurred while Israeli forces were violently suppressing a weekly protest against an Israeli settlement. Israeli forces employed live ammunition, stun grenades, and tear gas, and also resulted in the injury of an 18-year-old Palestinian man via shrapnel. Eygi was reportedly part of the Faz’a campaign, which aims to mobilize international solidarity activists on the ground in Palestine to protect Palestinian farmers from Israeli settlers and military forces. Eygi was also an activist with the International Solidarity Movement, a Palestinian-led organization committed to resisting the occupation.

ISM released a statement condemning Eygi’s killing, quoting multiple ISM members. ISM volunteer Mariam Dag (a pseudonymn) witnessed the shooting, and said ““We were peacefully demonstrating alongside Palestinians against the colonization of their land, and the illegal settlement of Evyatar. The situation escalated when the Israeli army began to fire tear gas and live ammunition, forcing us to retreat. We were standing on the road, about 200 meters from the soldiers, with a sniper clearly visible on the roof. Our fellow volunteer was standing a bit further back, near an olive tree with some other activists. Despite this, the army intentionally shot her in the head.”

Dag continued, “This is just another example of the decades of impunity granted to the Israeli government and army, bolstered by the support of the US and European governments, who are complicit in enabling genocide in Gaza. Palestinians have suffered far too long under the weight of colonization. We will continue to stand in solidarity and honor the martyrs until Palestine is free.”

The Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the “brutal execution committed today by Israeli occupation forces,” stating that “the ministry views this act as part of the ongoing crimes perpetrated by the Israeli occupation against the Palestinian people, including genocide, forced displacement, and the targeting of individuals who show solidarity with the Palestinian cause.”

The Ministry “calls on the international community, human rights organizations, and global institutions to take urgent action to provide international protection for Palestinians. The Ministry urges these entities to fulfill their legal and moral responsibilities by addressing violations, including genocide, forced displacement, illegal settlements, and extrajudicial killings, and to hold Israeli war criminals accountable.”

It is unclear how the United States will respond, beyond offering their “deepest condolences.” Israel has killed several US citizens, including two Palestinian-American teenagers earlier this year, Mohammad Khdour and Tawfic Abdel Jabbar, both 17 years old, also shot by Israeli forces. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken again offered condolences for the teenagers “who reportedly were killed,” but did nothing more than call for an investigation.

“We’ve made clear that with regard to the incidents you’ve alluded to, there needs to be an investigation. We need to get the facts. And if appropriate, there needs to be accountability,” Blinken said at the time.

The families were unsatisfied with the US’s response. “We don’t need talking, man,” said Adnan Khdour, uncle to Mohammad Khdour, killed by Israeli forces in the West Bank. “We need something. We want to see something.” The US has never conditioned aid to Israel based on the killing of a US citizen.

Eygi’s killing recalls the high-profile case of Israel’s murder of US activist Rachel Corrie in 2003, who was run over by a bulldozer trying to demolish a Palestinian home in Rafah. The United States did nothing to punish Israel, despite US officials themselves claiming that the Israeli investigation into Corrie’s death was not “credible.” In fact, the US itself is complicit in the killing as the Caterpillar bulldozer which killed Corrie was supplied by the US as part of its aid to Israel.

The Party for Socialism and Liberation, a US-based socialist political party active in the Palestine solidarity movement, said of Eygi’s killing: “This killing, like so many others, was carried out thanks to weaponry provided by the United States. We demand the Biden administration end all aid to this genocidal regime. The killers of Aysenur should be brought to justice, alongside the killers of thousands of Palestinians.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/09/06/ ... west-bank/

******

U.S. Efforts to Rally Regional Powers Against Yemen Clash with Reality in the Red Sea
Posted by Internationalist 360° on September 6, 2024
Ansarollah

Image

In a transparent attempt to rally regional powers against Yemen and halt naval operations supporting Gaza after the failure of American and European efforts, the U.S. military claimed that Yemeni Armed Forces targeted an oil tanker owned by the Saudi regime in the Red Sea. However, the Saudi sides swiftly denied the allegation, further exposing the U.S.’s failure in the Red Sea, not only on the battlefield but also in the realm of media.
Shortly after the U.S. Central Command released a statement claiming that Yemeni forces had attacked the Saudi-owned oil tanker “Amjad”, the Saudi state-owned company Bahri, which operates the vessel, issued a statement refuting the U.S. claims. Bahri confirmed, “The “Amjad” tanker was not targeted, nor sustained any damage or injuries, and continues its journey as planned without interruption.”

The American claims regarding the targeting of the Saudi vessel are part of ongoing attempts to rally regional states to act against Yemen’s operations supporting Gaza, under the pretext that these operations threaten overall maritime traffic in the region. However, Washington has failed to promote this narrative for more than ten months. International media, including U.S. outlets, have repeatedly reported that Yemeni operations are selectively targeting vessels linked to Israel, the U.S., the UK, and companies connected to occupied Palestinian ports.

Most Arab nations have refused to join the coalition formed by the U.S. under the name “Operation Sentinelle,” a stance that has highlighted the significant failure of American efforts to gather allies and proxies. This failure has persisted, with the U.S. unable to recover. Even when Washington pushed Saudi Arabia to escalate economically to pressure Yemen into halting its operations, Sana’a and the revolutionary leadership quickly forced Riyadh to abandon that approach.

American think tanks connected to intelligence services continue to propose involving U.S.-aligned Arab nations in efforts to stop Yemen’s operations supporting Gaza, as a way to compensate for the failures of the U.S. and Europe over the past ten months. Yet, these efforts consistently run into the same obstacle: it is widely known which ships are being targeted in Yemeni operational areas, and it is clear that there is no general threat to commercial traffic. This is reflected in the Saudi shipping company’s quick rejection of the U.S. allegations.

Moreover, Sana’a has established a deterrence equation that preempts any attempts by client regimes to escalate against Yemen. This is especially true for members of the coalition of aggression, who are well aware that any escalation against Yemen would come at a steep cost.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2024/09/ ... e-red-sea/

******

US reinforces occupation bases in Syria bracing for resistance attacks

The US is expanding its presence in Iraq and Syria amid fears of a regional war with Iran and the Axis of Resistance

News Desk

SEP 7, 2024

Image
US troops occupying Syria (Photo credit: War on the Rocks)

The US military has transferred large amounts of weapons and military equipment, including defense systems, to its illegal bases in Syria over the past month in an attempt to prevent the recurrence of resistance attacks against its bases and soldiers, Al-Akhbar reported on 7 September.

Local sources speaking with the Lebanese newspaper revealed that "in the last month, the Americans brought 22 batches of weapons and equipment to the bases in Hasaka and Deir Ezzor, including 19 batches that arrived by air to the Kharab al-Jir, Al-Shaddadi, Conoco, and Al-Omar bases, and three batches that arrived by land via the illegal Al-Walid crossing with Iraq."

The sources added that "most of the weapons transported are surveillance and monitoring systems, in addition to equipment designated to confront close air targets such as drones and medium and short-range missiles."

The sources pointed out that "the American bases used laser systems for the first time in missions to monitor, observe, and target drones and missiles.

In addition, the US has carried out additional military exercises. The sources stated that "the [US] coalition carried out more than 15 live training exercises on the use of these weapons and selecting their readiness, most of which were at the Omar field bases and the Conoco gas plant."

The sources believed that "these unprecedented movements in Syria, at least in terms of density, reveal American intentions to strengthen Washington's military presence in Syria," adding that "there is a great focus on the need to curb the resistance factions in Syria and Iraq, and neutralize their weapons."

The Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI) coalition, made up of Iraqi resistance factions who banded together in October last year, began attacking US bases in Iraq and Syria following the start of the war in Gaza.

US efforts to reinforce its forces illegally occupying Syria follow attacks carried out by five Iraqi resistance factions against US bases in Syria during the month of August.

On 10 August, a drone attack on the Kharab al-Jir base in northeastern Syria injured several US and coalition personnel.

In late August, resistance factions targeted a US patrol consisting of six vehicles with direct gunfire on the eastern bank of the Euphrates River in the Deir Ezzor countryside. The Syrian army controls territory in the same area on the western bank of the river.

Despite the attacks, US Assistant Deputy Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs and the official in charge of the Syrian file at the US State Department, Ethan Goldrich, said on 5 September that "US forces will not withdraw from Syria."

When asked whether there was a timetable for the withdrawal of these forces, he said: "Currently, our focus is on the goal, which is to prevent ISIS from reappearing."

US forces in Syria rely on support from US forces in neighboring Iraq for support and resupply.

The US has used the presence of ISIS in eastern Syria and western Iraq as a pretext to maintain troops in both countries despite having covertly supported the terror group in its blitzkrieg conquest of territory in 2014.

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammad Shia al-Sudani has stated multiple times this year that ISIS is no longer a threat to Iraq and has been leading negotiations with Washington for the withdrawal of the US troop presence in Iraq.

However, Washington has been reinforcing its presence in Iraq, including in oil-rich Kirkuk, and recently suspended negotiations with Baghdad over the US troop withdrawal, amid the ongoing possibility of a regional war between the US and Israel on the one hand, and Iran and the Axis of Resistance, on the other.

https://thecradle.co/articles/us-reinfo ... ce-attacks

Three Israeli security guards shot dead by Jordanian truck driver at Allenby border crossing

Before his truck was searched at the crossing, a Jordanian driver opened fire at the security guards from close range

News Desk

SEP 8, 2024

Image
Magen David Adom medics and paramedics at the scene of the shooting attack that killed three people at the Allenby Bridge crossing between Israel and Jordan on Sept. 8, 2024. (Photo credit: MDA)

Three Israeli security guards were shot and killed at the Allenby Bridge (Al-Karameh) border crossing between Jordan and the occupied West Bank, Maariv reported on 8 September.

The man who carried out the shooting, reportedly a truck driver from Jordan, arrived at the terminal and opened fire at the security guards from close range, shooting them in the head, before he was himself shot and killed by border security guards.

The Magen David Adom ambulance service arrived at the scene and treated the three guards, all around 50 years old, before declaring their deaths.

Israel Hayom reported that a preliminary investigation into the circumstances of the attack indicates that a truck driver who arrived from the Jordanian side had concealed a Kalashnikov rifle in his vehicle.

He drew the weapon and opened fire on Israeli workers after reaching the shared unloading area, but before a security check was conducted.


Following the attack, the crossing was temporarily shut down, preventing the movement of travelers from both directions.

David Elhayani, the Chairman of the Jordan Valley Council, called for the application of Israeli sovereignty over the entire Jordan Valley area, the Israeli Broadcasting Corporation reported.

Israeli forces proceeded to assault Jordanian workers and truck drivers by beating and strip-searching them at the crossing.

Israeli violence in the occupied West Bank has escalated recently. This week, the Israeli military completed a vicious 10-day campaign, which killed 36 Palestinians and destroyed roads and infrastructure in Jenin, Tulkarem, and Tubas.

Israeli attacks on West Bank towns and refugee camps are expected to resume and continue with intensity for some time. Security officials told Israel Hayom this week that the Israeli army has internally classified the occupied West Bank as “the second most critical front, immediately after Gaza.”

Raids in the northern West Bank are “set to continue in the foreseeable future,” the security officials said.

http://thecradle-main.oss-eu-central-1. ... 2c055.webp
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply