Africa

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 09, 2023 10:42 pm

France invaded Niger
August 9, 6:26 p.m

Image

The authorities of Niger accused France of attacking the Niger military and invading the country's airspace.
France has not yet commented on the accusations of aggression against Niger.

France attacked Niger

The new authorities of Niger reported that the French military in Niger attacked the troops of the National Guard of Niger, and also violated the country's airspace (the French plane took off from N'Djamena in Chad and, ignoring Niger's air traffic controllers, landed on the territory of the country. It is now international law. Also, the authorities of Niger accused France of releasing 16 jihadists who are planned to be used for subversive activities in Niger

US Embassy in Niamey issued a safety warning to US citizens
EU calls for increased economic pressure on Niger to weaken the military junta, as the country already lacks electricity and drugs.As befits terrorists, he is trying to threaten the civilian population of a country in which they care about "democracy" in words.

The level of combat readiness of the armed forces and power structures of Niger has been increased. The country continues to prepare to repel external aggression.

No forces of PMC "Wagner" in Niger have not yet been noted. Wagner forces are now deployed in the Central African Republic and Mali.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8556116.html

Google Translator.

*******

France never stopped looting Africa, now the tables are turning

As developments in West Africa demonstrate, the francophone countries are no longer willing to accept French neo-colonialism. With the fear factor finally removed, Africa’s quest for genuine independence is steadily coming to fruition.


Brad Pearce
AUG 8, 2023

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

The 26 July coup in the West African nation of Niger, which threatens to undermine French and US military presence in the region, has shed light on the historical exploitation and continued practices of Francafrique - the term used to describe the persistent exploitation by the former French Empire in Africa.

France heavily relies on nuclear energy, with 68 percent of its power coming from nuclear plants. It obtains 19 percent of the uranium required to run these plants from Niger. Despite this significant contribution toward France's energy needs, only 14.3 percent of Nigeriens have access to a power grid, and even that is often unreliable. This stark contrast highlights the disparities and ongoing exploitation by rapine foreign powers throughout the African continent.

The Legacy of Francafrique

Francafrique has been known for its exploitative systems designed to profit from African resources, using pressure, capital, and frequently outright force to maintain control over its former empire. As a result, many African states, including Niger, continue to face poverty and underdevelopment.

Burkina Faso’s young, charismatic leader Ibrahim Traore recently spoke at the Russia-Africa summit in St. Petersburg and decried the fact that Africa is resource-rich, but its people are poor, and criticized African leaders seeking hand-outs from the west, as they perpetuate dependency and poverty. He also described what is being imposed on Africa as a form of slavery, stating:

“As far as what concerns Burkina Faso today, for more than eight years we’ve been confronted with the most barbaric, the most violent form of imperialist neo-colonialism. Slavery continues to impose itself on us. Our predecessors taught us one thing: a slave who cannot assume his own revolt does not deserve to be pitied. We do not feel sorry for ourselves, we do not ask anyone to feel sorry for us.”

France's inability to justify its presence in Africa with a coherent narrative further complicates the situation. Paris cannot openly confess its greed, feign a "civilizing mission," or admit to any responsibility due to its past crimes. This lack of purpose weakens French power on the continent, leading to violence and poverty in its wake.

West Africa's drive for further independence has left Atlanticists concerned about the opening this leaves for Eurasian powers like Russia and China to increase their influence in Africa. The west's reaction reflects a lack of respect for the sovereignty of African countries, viewing the continent merely as a theater to maintain global dominance.

Since the Ukraine war's onset in early 2022, Atlanticists have expressed alarm over the unwillingness of Global South states to support the west's anti-Russia policies, a trend further amplified by the shift to multipolarism everywhere. This weakening of western hegemony has opened a path for many nations to avidly explore their geopolitical options and diversify their economies.

A report from the Munich Security Conference held in February highlighted this very real schism with the west:

“Many countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America have steadily lost faith in the legitimacy and fairness of an international system which has neither granted them an appropriate voice in global affairs, nor sufficiently addressed their core concerns. To many states, these failures are deeply tied to the west. They find that the western-led order has been characterized by post-colonial domination, double standards, and neglect for developing countries' concerns.”

Fleeced by the CFA Franc

The aftermath of the Second World War marked a significant shift in global power dynamics, and the victorious powers sought to establish a new world order that would maintain peace and promote economic balance.

In the context of African colonies, where colonial troops played a major role in the allied victory, the victorious powers, including France, aimed to retain economic control and benefit from their former colonies even as the world moved towards decolonization.

This included the establishment of new currency systems, with French leader Charles De Gaulle creating two currencies collectively known as the CFA Franc in 1945 for former colonies in the Western and Central zone.

As the push for political independence grew stronger in the late 1950s, France organized referendums in its African colonies to vote on accepting a constitution drafted by the French.

Guinea, led by former trade unionist Sekou Toure, opposed accepting the French constitution and voted overwhelmingly against it. In a furious response, De Gaulle’s government withdrew all French administrators from Guinea and took action to sabotage the country's infrastructure and resources. The harsh measures by Paris aimed to serve as an example of what would happen to any former French colony that resisted France's agenda.

During the Cold War, the Communist states exploited such actions by presenting themselves as liberators and allies of African countries that sought independence from European influence. This stance has led to some Africans viewing countries like Russia as more equitable partners compared to France.

Over the years, France has demonstrated a pattern of intervening militarily - over 50 times since 1960 - in African countries to secure governments that remain compliant with French economic interests, particularly related to the continued use of the CFA Franc.

The system by which the CFA Franc operates has historically been one of a fixed exchange rate where the currency has unlimited convertibility but is permanently pegged to the French currency, previously the Franc and then the Euro.

African currency under French control

This means that African countries cannot influence the value of their own currency, and the difference in value makes it so that France can buy African products artificially cheap while Africans are able to buy fewer goods with the money they exchange.

Worse yet, France had requirements to store, and thus profit from, the foreign reserves owned by its former colonies, though the requirement of holding 50 percent of their foreign exchange reserves in a French-ran bank was dropped for the western zone in 2019.

Under this scheme, African states received a nominal amount of interest, but the bank benefited from lending that capital out at higher rates and attaining massive profits off of African resources and labor. This is despite the fact that many countries in Francophone Africa are major gold exporters and thus have a multitude of options for storing wealth to back a currency in alternative central banks.

While the CFA Franc system has provided some benefits in terms of stability and preventing Zimbabwean-style hyperinflation, it has also come under scrutiny for imposing requirements on African countries that are not placed on more powerful nations. The lack of control over their own currency has hindered economic growth and made these countries vulnerable to global economic shocks.

Northern African states such as Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco chose to leave the CFA Franc upon gaining independence and have experienced relatively higher prosperity. Similarly, Botswana's success with its own national currency demonstrates that proper management can lead to stable democracy and economic growth, even for less developed nations.

Exclusive rights and privileges

The CFA Franc system has been the geopolitical equivalent of one’s father insisting he manages their savings while leaving them out of his will. There are benefits to having a trade and currency zone, such as the current ECOWAS union that covers the Western part of the continent, but by design under the CFA Franc system, independence has been an illusion by which France has fleeced these countries.

France has been dependent on Africa for its status as a world power for more than a century. Among other privileges it has carved out for itself in post-colonial treaties, France has had the exclusive right to sell military equipment to former colonies, and enjoys the first right to any natural resources discovered. Paris makes great use of these privileges: as just one example, 36.4 percent of France’s gas is sourced from the African continent.

Moreover, a vast network of French business interests, which include major multinational companies, dominate industries such as energy, communications, and transportation in many African countries. France's government also supports French businesses in Africa in several ways, including through an enormous public company called COFACE which guarantees French exports into these underdeveloped markets.

Towards independence and self-reliance

This economic dependence has contributed to the perpetuation of a system where African states remain weak, pliant, and reliant on resource exports, primarily benefiting French companies and interests. Additionally, African states are obligated to ally with France in any major conflict, further eroding their national sovereignty.

The African continent suffers from many ailments, but perhaps the most persistent and nefarious are a lack of sovereignty and access to capital. Meanwhile, much of Europe’s prosperity has been derived from looting the Global South for centuries.

The case of Brussels, built on the wealth derived from the brutal exploitation of the Congo under Belgian King Leopold II, is a stark reminder of the deep-rooted impact of colonialism. When the monarch’s crimes against humanity were discovered, he was ultimately forced to bequeath the majority of his fortune to the Belgian state upon his death.

Not wanting to do so, he embarked on an enormous series of public works to spend his ill-gotten gains, creating modern Brussels. Now the EU and NATO meet there and audaciously give disingenuous lectures about universal human rights while surrounded by the profits of some of the most brutal cases of oppression in human history.

While military governments often face challenges in achieving their stated goals, it is evident that western-backed "civil democracies" have also struggled to significantly improve the security and well-being of the African public.

The path to solving Africa's problems lies in transformative leaders who can shrug off the legacy and remaining shackles of colonialism and enable the continent to carve out a genuine, homegrown path to independence and self-reliance.

https://new.thecradle.co/articles/franc ... re-turning

******

Image
A Beninese soldier racks his weapon during a joint U.S.-Benin live fire exercise in preparation for SHARED ACCORD 2009’s final field training event. SHARED ACCORD is a scheduled, combined U.S.-Benin exercise designed to improve interoperability and mutual understanding of each nation’s military tactics, techniques and procedures. Humanitarian and civil affairs events run concurrent with the military training. The exercise is scheduled to conclude June 25. VIRIN: 090616-M-3107S-0401 (Photo: Lance Cpl. Jad Sleiman, USMC / Wikimedia Commons)

No to the new war in Africa, stop military intervention in Niger, lift sanctions to Burkina Faso and Niger
Originally published: Defend Democracy Press on August 5, 2023 by Pavan Kulkarni (more by Defend Democracy Press) | (Posted Aug 09, 2023)

The regional bloc, Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), has drawn up a plan for a military invasion of Niger to restore the ousted Mohamed Bazoum to presidency. However, in Nigeria, whose president Bola Tinubu is the current chair of ECOWAS, the Senate has refused to support the military intervention.

On Saturday, August 5, at a closed-door executive session to deliberate on Tinubu’s letter seeking the Senate’s support for “military buildup and deployment of personnel for military intervention,” “almost all senators… totally ruled out the military options,” an unnamed senator told Premium Times.

Pointing out that “our military is highly ill-equipped and not prepared to fight any war,” the Senators argued that “the Federal Government should focus on solving the Boko Haram, banditry, and ESN/IPOB menaces… instead of contemplating going to war in a foreign country.”

The war plans were prepared at a meeting of the chiefs of staff of ECOWAS member countries which ended on Friday, August 4. “All the elements that will go into any eventual intervention have been worked out here, including the resources needed, the how and when we are going to deploy the force,” said Abdel Fatau Musah, ECOWAS Commissioner for Political affairs, Peace and Security.

Earlier on July 30, ECOWAS had threatened military invasion of Niger if its military junta, the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP), did not restore Bazoum as the president by Sunday, August 6. He was ousted on July 26 in a popularly-welcomed coup by Gen. Abdourahmane Tchiani, who was the head of the Presidential Guard.

France, which has up to 1,500 troops in Niger, and the U.S., with another 1,100 troops in two bases, are both backing ECOWAS. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Thursday, August 3, “We strongly support the very strong leadership of ECOWAS on Niger.” White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby added that there was still “time and space” for diplomacy, but that “window is not going to be open forever.”

While the U.S. President Joe Biden said that the “Nigerien people have the right to choose their leaders,” the “Nigerien people,” who perceive Bazoum as a corrupt puppet of France, have repeatedly mobilized in tens of thousands to support the coup.

A coalition of 14 trade union centers called the Unité d’Actions Syndicales du Niger (UAS-Niger), which had been demanding the withdrawal of French troops, has supported the coup and called on Nigeriens to rally behind the CNSP.

As Nigeriens celebrated the anniversary of its independence from France on August 3, the CNSP terminated five military agreements signed with France between 1977 and 2020, allowing the former colonizer to station up to 1,500 troops in the country.

Donning T-shirts with coup leader Tchiani’s image, thousands took to the streets once again that day, sloganeering “Down with France,” and demanding the withdrawal of its troops and other foreign forces, including those of Italy which has 300 soldiers and the European Union (EU) which has a smaller contingent.

The mass-demonstration was organized by the anti-imperialist M62 Movement, formed last year as a coalition of 15 civil society organizations which have been protesting against French deployment in the country for at least two years. One demonstrator said,

It is only security that interests us..[whether it is provided by] Russia, China, Turkey…We just don’t want the French who have been looting us since 1960.

France, however, has refused to withdraw its troops, with its foreign ministry’s spokesperson Anne-Clair Legendre saying,

We don’t answer to the putschists. We recognize one constitutional order only, that of President Bazoum.

Under detention by the army, Bazoum, who had instituted a crackdown on the anti-French movement in the country, wrote a column in the Washington Post on independence day, calling for U.S. intervention to restore his power. A U.S. warplane C-17A–which is “is capable of rapid strategic delivery of troops and all types of cargo to main operating bases or directly to forward bases in the deployment area”–arrived in Benin shortly after its government declared support to the military intervention.

In the meantime, as a part of ECOWAS sanctions, Nigeria has stopped electricity supply to Niger. While Niger’s high-grade uranium is used to power a third of the light bulbs in France, its own electrification rate is less than 18%. Up to 90% of its power is imported from Nigeria.

Difficult times
“The weeks and months to come will certainly be difficult for our country. Those who oppose us have no limits when it comes to defending their selfish interests. They will only stop in the face of the firm determination of the Nigerien people,” Tchiani said.

Suspending Niger’s diplomatic ties with France, the U.S., Nigeria, and Togo, also an ECOWAS country, Tchiani warned that “any aggression or attempted aggression against the State of Niger will see an immediate and unannounced response from the Niger Defense and Security Forces.”

Mali, Burkina Faso and Guinea–three other suspended members of ECOWAS, sanctioned after similar popularly-supported coups–have expressed support to Niger. Together, they make up nearly 60% of the total land-area of ECOWAS countries. Mali and Burkina Faso, whose military juntas ordered the French troops out of their countries after taking power, have said they will mobilize their forces in defense of Niger if it is attacked.

The Vice-President of the CNSP, Lt. Gen. Salifou Mody, traveled to Mali and met its president, Colonel Assimi Goita. He also held a meeting with “someone from Wagner” while in Mali, AP reported. Mody also met with Burkina Faso’s leader, Captain Ibrahim Traore, and spoke about ECOWAS.

“We spoke precisely about this situation because we would not like Niger to become the new Libya,” Mody said, adding that they have decided to “undertake a number of activities to be able to deal with the situation.”

Ivory Coast, Benin, and Senegal have pledged to send troops for the ECOWAS invasion. Chad, whose president also took power in a coup but remained in the West’s good books, not having demanded the withdrawal of French troops, has refused to take part in the military intervention.

While supporting the call for restoration of Bazoum, Niger’s northern neighbor Algeria, has opposed “foreign military intervention,” which it said will “only complicate and exacerbate the current crisis.” Russia had also called for the restoration of constitutional order, but opposed military intervention.

Peoples’ movements across West Africa and other parts of the continent have opposed military intervention, and called for the withdrawal of all foreign bases in Niger and other countries of the region.

In a statement on August 4, the Workers Democratic Way party in Morocco expressed its “strong rejection and condemnation of the imperialist threats, especially from the French, of direct military intervention or through its puppet regimes in the region against Niger,” adding that “a war could ignite the entire region, leaving behind destruction, loss of lives, and horrific tragedies.” The Party further affirmed “the right of the Nigerien people to self-determination away from foreign interference.”

The Communist Party of Kenya condemned foreign military bases in Africa, which serve “as instruments of imperialistic control.” The party added that the “presence of these military bases deepens historical wounds of colonization and reinforces the oppressive grip of foreign powers. We call for the immediate dismantling of all foreign military bases in Africa to protect our dignity and freedom.”

https://mronline.org/2023/08/09/no-to-t ... and-niger/

******

Socialist Party of Zambia condemns arrest of Dr. Fred M’membe

Dr. Fred M’membe was arrested on charges of libel on August 8, after he was summoned for questioning by the Zambian police. An outspoken critic of imperialist and neoliberal policies, M’membe had long warned of his arrest amid attacks on the Socialist Party

August 08, 2023 by Tanupriya Singh

Image
SP President Fred M’membe (Center) was arrested by Zambian police on charges of libel on August 8. Photo: Socialist Party of Zambia

The president of the Socialist Party (SP) of Zambia, Dr. Fred M’membe was arrested by police on August 8. The leader and veteran journalist was charged with the offense of libel, after he was summoned for questioning at the Woodlands Police Station in Lusaka on Tuesday.

As M’membe arrived at the police station, members of the SP and supporters gathered in the area in solidarity, carrying the banner of the Student Socialist Movement, the flags of the SP, and placards with slogans that read “Hands Off Our President!”

Image
Members of the SP gather to denounce police actions against president Fred M’membe. Photo via Facebook
In a statement on August 6, the Socialist Party students movement’s chairperson, Joseph Musonda said, “We are angry at the manner [in which] the state has been treating our President [M’membe]. Even if you are not a socialist, you can see the injustice that has been done against our President. Just recently you saw the political violence in Mkushi, Serenje, Chitimukulu, Mwansabombwe, Luapula province[s]… The SP President has always complained to the relevant authorities. But he has been treated as the instigator.”

Among these instances of violence was that of Serenje, where in April, members of the SP were violently attacked by alleged cadres of the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND). While the attackers remained at large, the Zambian police arrested M’membe on charges related to the discharge of a firearm and assault.

Following the proceedings at the Woodlands Police Station on August 8, a statement by a police spokesperson announced that M’membe had been charged with libel in relation to an article that was published and circulated on social media on June 6 with the alleged “intent to defame” the Deputy Inspector General of Police. Police have also issued a “warn and caution statement” to M’membe regarding an alleged “offense of communication of certain information” contrary to Zambian law.

Speaking to the media, M’membe’s lawyer Simon Mulenga Mwila stated that M’membe had denied the allegations and that he “remained in high spirits”. As he was being escorted away, M’membe said “We are being locked up, it is not the first time it has been done and it will not be the last, but it has never taken anybody anywhere…”

SP spokesperson Frank Bwalya later notified that the “police had managed to frustrate efforts to get [a] police bond” for M’membe, “their plan to make him sleep in the cells [in the police station] has worked.” The SP president remained in detention at the Woodlands Police Station as of the evening of August 8, where he has since been visited by members of Zambian political parties including the former ruling Patriotic Front (PF) and the National Democratic Congress (NDC).

M’membe had been warning of the threat of his arrest for weeks, stating back in June that the SP had received “reliable information” that the police, “in collaboration with UPND cadres drafted into the State House security” intended to “abduct him”, further accusing President Hakainde Hichilema and the Deputy Inspector General of Police of the State House of engaging in a “gestapo style of policing.”

In a statement to the media on August 8, the Inspector General of Police, Graphel Musamba, said, “We have noted with serious concern the utterances recently made by Socialist Party leader Dr. Fred M’membe. The statements published in some tabloids and various social media platforms are inclined at nothing but inciting the peace loving people of Zambia so that they lapse into civil disobedience in order for them to gain scarce political mileage.”

Musamba went on to threaten that “the Zambia Police Service has an obligation to defend the constitution at any cost and that it will do, even if it takes some stern measures such as smashing the rebellion which we know is carefully being instigated by [the] Socialist Party… As a reminder to the Socialist Party, if you check the history of this country, people with frivolous dreams such as yours have been defeated.”

Calling it an “outrightly political statement,” M’membe responded to the Inspector General’s comments on his Facebook page— “The Zambian people already know the suffering they are facing under Mr. Hichilema’s one-term regime. Let Mr. Hichilema know that the Zambian people don’t need anyone to incite them; they are fully awake to the suffering he has put them through so far.”

“What is likely to incite Zambians is the hunger and untold suffering they are being subjected to as their President continues to work very hard to serve imperialists and transnational corporations. What has caused Zambians to lose faith and confidence in Mr. Hichilema and his far-right UPND government are the gross inequalities and injustices that Mr. Hichilema is reinforcing and then commanding his Inspector General of Police to defend.”

“Zambia needs a conscious leadership that understands our non-aligned strategy to our foreign policy. The clientist role played by the UPND government is crippling,” M’membe had said in a tweet in July.

The SP has consistently denounced Western imperialism and neoliberal policies. In Zambia, it has criticized the lack of government response to the worsening cost of living crisis, exemplified by the rising prices and shortages of mealie meal (a type of maize flour), fuel, and electricity.

In an article published on July 29, M’membe denounced the UPND administration’s two years in office as being “disastrous,” marked by the arrest of opponents and “selective justice,” and by the government being a “puppet of Western governments by allowing an AFRICOM “office” in Lusaka, while backtracking on its promises.

In his statement on August 8, M’membe added further, “The problems this regime finds itself with today emanate from its own lies, deception, or simply put, unfulfilled promises and shameless puppetry by a President and regime eager to serve Western and transnational corporation interests at the expense of its own people, many of whom can now only dream of half a meal a day.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/08/ ... ed-mmembe/

*******

Image

NIGER: AFTERMATH OF THE FALL OF GADDAFI IN THE AFRICAN SAHEL
9 Aug 2023 , 12:39 pm .

Niger is one of the countries located in the Sahel region, perhaps the most historically exploited area in the world. It is the southern fringe of the Sahara, which divides the Maghreb from sub-Saharan Africa. In Arabic it means " limit " . It concentrates a huge amount of strategic resources that have been overexploited for centuries, a catalog of destabilizations and chaos due to the rise of foreign military interventions, coups d'état and terrorism in recent decades and, therefore, the cradle of several of the greatest leaders anti-colonial and pan-African of the 20th century.

The Sahel is a territorial band with a length of 5,400 kilometers that joins the Atlantic coast of Mauritania and Senegal with the Red Sea on the shores of Sudan and Eritrea; in the middle, from east to west, are Ethiopia, Chad, Niger, northern Nigeria, Mali and Burkina Faso.

The international slave trade originated in its western segment in the 16th century: the triangular trade — well describedby the Trinidadian politician and historian Eric Williams-, based on the export of junk products from Europe to the Sahel, where they were exchanged for African slaves to be transferred to America, where they arrived to produce and extract the goods that were later marketed in the European markets. The mercantile system, from which modern capitalism emerged, would not have existed without West Africans becoming the main human commodity in this triangulation. The Sahel was also the scene of trans-Saharan activity, where different routes connected to all African latitudes, and which lasted longer than the triangular one.

After the Berlin Conference (1884-85), in which Spain, Italy, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Portugal and Belgium arbitrarily divided and divided the entire continent as colonies, with the exception of Ethiopia —formerly called Abyssinia— and Liberia , the role of Africa as a source of raw materials and slave labor in the international division of labor deepened, and with it the history of rebellions, revolutions, putschs, assassinations, secession and liberation movements in response to, and in line with, the colonial barbarism lived for centuries.

Image

France managed to keep much of the Sahel, and has enjoyed the mining, energy, natural and human resources of the region, making up French West Africa (AOF) . Among its possessions were Mauritania, Senegal, French Sudan (present-day Mali), French Guinea (present-day Guinea-Conakry), Ivory Coast, Upper Volta (present-day Burkina Faso), Dahomey (present-day Benin) and Niger.

The colonial benefit was marked by the diversity of natural resources, the spaces of trans-Saharan commercial transit —not only the transatlantic slave route but also the trans-Saharan one) and the deposits of minerals, oil and gas. To the south of the strip, in the area of ​​the great lakes, there is also one of the largest water reserves in the world, as well as iron, salt, diamond, copper, coal and uranium. The interests of French capital around the Sahel gave geopolitical and geostrategic importance to the region; the mandate over Algeria, Madagascar, Tunisia, Togo and part of Morocco, Cameroon and present-day Chad, the Central African Republic, Congo and Gabon —together it was called French Equatorial Africa— granted a profit margin that, after the African independence processes ,

Starting in the 1960s, liberation movements began in the Sahel, after the start of the Algerian war in 1954. That year, France ended up losing its 14 colonies . It was a moment when expressions and leaderships in favor of national sovereignty sprouted from all African countries, the dawn of pan-Africanism with the Ghanaian Kwame Nkrumah as its main spokesperson and articulator. Modibo Keïta, former president of Mali (1960-1968), and Thomas Sankara, in Upper Volta, were born in the French colonies, who led a political revolution that led to the renaming of the country —and the national project— as Burkina Faso, which they represent today the ideals and sentiments of African liberation and independence.

The rise of these political figures and processes were marked by the geopolitical beacon of the Bandung Conference in 1955, which gave birth to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), of which Nkrumah, representing Ghana and in favor of directing African wills towards a common destiny, helped organize and was one of its most important promoters. The struggles in Asia also share the same context of the fate of Africa during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s: some were references to others.

Image

Subsequently, after a series of US and European operations to depose and undermine anti-colonial and pro-independence leaderships in Africa, install governments in favor of North American and European foreign policy and capital, insert themselves into African socio-economic dynamics and loot the continent's resources. Through neocolonial practices, the present in the Sahel is dominated by the geopolitical and geostrategic agenda of different global powers.

To provide just one example of the colonial relationship, now quite viral for the demonstrative: Niger's uranium produces 40% of France's electricity through nuclear power, while 89% of the Nigerien population has no electricity service. In 2014 , one in three light bulbs in France worked with uranium from that source. This country is the sixth largest world producer of the aforementioned mineral; It is mined near the twin mining towns of Arlit and Akokan, 900 kilometers northeast of the capital Niamey, on the southern border of the Sahara desert and in the western range of the Aïr Mountains.

The asymmetry in the correlation between France and Niger is a characteristic of neocolonial dynamics: development for them, anti-development and overexploitation for those.

This reason is the fundamental engine of the latest political and geopolitical events that the countries of the Sahel have carried out, a strip where the rate of coups d'état has risen: since 2020 six countries have had forced changes of government, where military juntas have been established and transitional administrations with anti-colonial and pan-African visions and leaders with experience in the fight against terrorism, the other nodal factor inserted in the brokering of interests surrounding the situation in Niger and other neighboring countries that support the CNSP.

According to the latest Global Terrorism Index report from the Institute for Economics and Peace:

" The Sahel is the region of the world most affected by terrorism, registering a notable deterioration in 2022 despite improvements in Nigeria and Niger. Both Burkina Faso and Mali saw substantial increases in deaths from terrorism with an increase of 50 % and 56%, or 1,135 and 944 deaths, respectively.In addition, four of the ten Sahelian countries are among the ten worst scores in the Global Terrorism Index (GTI).Neighboring Sahelian states also experienced an increase in terrorist activity in 2022, and Benin and Togo counted more than ten deaths for the first time " (p. 13).

Specifically, jihadist terrorism has a particular role in this scenario and, therefore, it is connected to the political and geopolitical factors in dispute. The destruction it has left in its wake has grown, and it has a solid foundation for history.

THE LIBYAN ORIGIN: THE POST-GADDAFI ERA
With the fall —and martyrdom— of Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi in 2011, two tectonic movements of international scope occurred, of special historical significance for the Sahel: 1) the end of the Libya-European Union migration agreement; and 2) the mobilization of the groups that were in the coup against Libya to their countries of origin —with Azawad, the Tuareg region where Timbuktu is located, in the north of Mali, one of the epicenters—, which gave rise to a network of networks of organizations affiliated with jihadist terrorism along the route of the strip.

Following the intervention of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Libya, there has been a situation of fragmented governance, in a context of erosion of state authority, a country turned into a slave market and smuggling of weapons, drugs and resources strategic open-air operations, in which Niger has become one of the main crossing points for trafficking networks, located at one of the vertices of the Mediterranean Sea, with routes to Italy and the island of Lampedusa off the coast, and to the within all regions of the African continent.

The post-Gaddafi Libyan security and stability crisis produced a loss of border control that de facto broke the agreement between Libya and the EU —through Italy— launched on October 5, 2010 . Supposedly 5 billion euros were invested to stop the " unpleasant " migratory flow, with successful results as a result of a collaboration that was cut short in 2011 and began the era of widespread jihadist terrorism in many parts of Africa, but which also succeeded in sneak in and settle in the main countries where the elite of European capital reside, including the United Kingdom, Germany and France. The effects of jihadist migration to Europe have been more than palpable over the last decade.

At present, the Europeans —with Italy at the helm, a former metropolis— continue to debate which is the best project to stop illegal migration from Libya, while the country continues to experience the consequences of the NATO intervention at the Mediterranean entrance to Africa.

Inland, one of the routes of illegal trade and terrorism crosses the different national territories of the Sahel, through which Niger appears as an obligatory step on the way to Mali, Burkina Faso and Nigeria, from south to north. Within that area, new branches of jihadist terrorism emerged after Al-Qaeda's involvement bore its fruits of destruction and chaos in 2011. Al-Qaeda's operations in Libya officially began in 2007, as announced by one of its leaders, Ayman al-Zawahiri, at the time. Libyan rebel commander Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi admittedthat its fighters had ties to al Qaeda. The jihadists who fought in Iraq were on the front lines of the battle against the Gaddafi government, just as they were in Afghanistan in the 1980s and the Algerian civil war in the 1990s; many of them were also in the Sahara and the Sahel.

The armed conflicts provoked by terrorist groups throughout the strip have opened up larger markets for the smuggling and trafficking of arms, drugs, slaves and raw materials, and have facilitated the rise of the illicit economy around the energy and mineral enclaves of the area, while mass displacement increased and a trail of chaotic destruction occurred in its wake.

Facts and investigations confirm that Al-Qaeda and Daesh (Islamic State) currently have branches and cells in the Sahel, called respectively Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) and Islamic State in the Greater Sahara (ISGS). , where they have committed war crimes and crimes against humanity. Extremist organizations such as Ansar Al-Din (Mali) and Boko Haram (Nigeria), also directly and indirectly related to the aforementioned, have taken advantage of the circumstances to expand their activities, turning the region into the epicenter of African jihadism, and have expanded the government instability and, therefore, the security crisis in the Sahel, as indicated by the aforementioned Global Terrorism Index in its 2023 edition.

Image

The situation in Burkina Faso and Mali was critical in terms of security , with daily massacres and atrocious crimes on public roads against civilians, under the consolidation of the operations of jihadist groups in the central Sahel , with a tendency to expand in Togo, Benin , Ghana and Ivory Coast. The germ of terror grew in the bowels of the Sahel, and the combat of the state armies against its forces has generated a chain reaction on the part of the military commanders responsible for neutralizing and defeating the enemy.

Currently, President Ibrahim Traoré, captain of the Burkinabe army, rules in Burkina Faso, a personality who has supported Niger from the first minute of the coup against the surrounding foreign powers. He came to power on October 6, 2022 after the overthrow of Paul-Henri Sandaogo Damiba. In his speech to the Russia-Africa Summit in late July, he referred to the Slavic federation as " family " and accused other African presidents of " puppets of imperialism . "

Colonel Assimi Goita seized power after two coups in 2021 in Mali. The criminal violence, of a jihadist nature, adds to the territorial conflict, calmed but unresolved, of the Tuareg rebellion at the beginning of the 2010s. The response to the complex scenario was the transition government led by Goita, who is negatively propagandized as "Putin's strongman in Africa" ​​because of his anti-colonial animosity towards the United States and France.

Following the same path, and returning to the Niger case: General Tchiani was criticizing for months the security policy of the Bazoum administration in the fight against terrorist jihadism, since the French troops in Niger multiplied without leaving any positive effect, except for the give security to the European companies that exploit Nigerien uranium and gold.

The relocation of the French forces of the anti-terrorist operation "Barkhane" —following the disaster of Operation Serval in 2013 — after their departure from Mali to Niger as a result of the failure of their objectives, and by sovereign order of the Malian government to expel the troops foreign, filled the camel's back and General Tchiani along with other senior officers of the Nigerien military corps took the measure of the coup in a country submerged in the tyranny of hunger, violence and neocolonial dependency.

Tchiani recounts : "We often tracked down the terrorists, but when we asked that we rush to kill them, former President Bazoum told us to first ask the French forces for permission. Our soldiers were falling on the fronts and France did nothing."

From this statement it can be deduced, with a minimal analysis of the facts, and keeping in mind the historical thread of the current scenario in West Africa, that the putschs in the western fringe of the Sahel are the response of the military commanders of Burkina Faso, Mali, Guinea , and now Niger, to a combination of increased jihadist terrorist activities, the debacle of French military and European initiatives in general, and the historical misery of its peoples: the cumulative effects of the post-Gaddafi era on the region.

And, on the other hand, the discourse of the Sahelian officials is in tune with the old pan-African spirit of the mid-twentieth century —the position of Burkina Faso stands out, more inclined towards the pan-African proposal over the other governments, currently more attached to the pragmatic one in terms of international alliances—, but updated to the context of contemporary disputes in the geopolitical and geoeconomic terrain in Africa, where the United States, China and Russia play a leading role.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/ni ... l-africano

Google Translator

******

Image

Victoria Nuland Has Gone To Africa

Victoria Nuland has gone to Africa. Gone to Africa to talk some sense into the Nigeriens and convince them to return to the shackles of Paris. Gone to Africa to harvest blood diamonds and cobalt. Gone to Africa to masturbate on Gaddafi’s grave. Gone to Africa to trade glass beads for slaves.

Caitlin Johnstone
August 9, 2023


Victoria Nuland has gone to Africa.
Gone to Africa to talk some sense into the Nigeriens
and convince them to return to the shackles of Paris.
Gone to Africa to harvest blood diamonds and cobalt.
Gone to Africa to masturbate on Gaddafi’s grave.
Gone to Africa to trade glass beads for slaves.

Victoria Nuland has gone to Africa
to help the bank boys keep their dicks in the mother continent,
to help keep the siphon tubes stuck into the mother continent,
to help keep the Russians and Chinese out of the mother continent.
Traveling around the mother continent in the mask of a medieval plague doctor,
collecting the fat leeches and replacing them with new ones.

The AFRICOM emblem looks like a vagina,
and Victoria Nuland looks like an involuntary pelvic exam.
She makes me feel like a lost kid in a cornfield at dusk.
She has mushroom clouds in her eyes.

Soon Victoria will leave Africa and go home,
back to the land where corporations are people and flags are gods,
where the presidents have dementia and the poor have college degrees,
where alienation flows like water and bullet casings fall like rain,
where people wear airpods to mute the screams of their hearts and the homeless,
where the middle class talk only to their Uber drivers and strangers they’ve mistaken for their Uber drivers,
where soldiers march for fascism while flying rainbow flags,
where war is a lucrative industry and journalism is a crime.

She’ll come home to a house that no millennial will ever be able to afford,
into the loving embrace of her blood-spattered husband.
They will make freakish, horrifying love that night,
and she will fall asleep and dream of passing out cookies
while the world turns to fire.

I had a dream, too.
One of the strange ones that always come true.
A pentagon was smashed to pieces by a giant black fist.
I don’t know what it means
or what future it portends,
but I do know Victoria Nuland
wasn’t passing out any damn cookies.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2023/08 ... to-africa/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 11, 2023 2:31 pm

ECOWAS says “no option taken off the table,” including the use of force, to address coup in Niger

As an emergency ECOWAS summit on the situation in Niger closes, ECOWAS orders the activation of its standby force

August 10, 2023 by Peoples Dispatch

Image
The President of Economic Community of West African States Commission, Omar Touray, orders activation of ECOWAS standby force

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), led by Nigerian President Bola Tinubu said on Thursday, August 10 that “no option had been taken off the table,” in terms of addressing the coup in Niger. Tinibu made this statement at the conclusion of the second emergency ECOWAS summit on the situation in Niger. ECOWAS also ordered the activation of a force on standby to intervene militarily in Niger.

Social movements and left organizations in West Africa and internationally have been urging against any military intervention from foreign powers since the coup took place. On July 30, just days after the coup, ECOWAS had issued an ultimatum saying it would “take all measures necessary,” including “the use of force,” if the ousted president and his government were not restored by Sunday, August 6. The bloc’s push for the reinstatement of President Mohamed Bazoum has been echoed by imperialist forces such as France and the United States.

The coup and the installation of the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP) has been accompanied by a popular uprising which demands an end to French military presence and imperialist economic policies such as the imposition of the CFA franc and the exploitative extraction of Niger’s rich natural resources. Niger is the European Union’s second-largest supplier of uranium. The CNSP which took power on July 26 has strongly condemned the threats lodged against it by ECOWAS as well as its non-military actions such as imposing a no-fly zone and freezing Niger’s assets in its central and commercial banks. The CNSP has also been vocal in opposing Western demands for a reversal of the coup.

On August 6, 30,000 people gathered in Niger’s capital of Niamey to show their support to the coup government. The developments in Niger occur in the context of growing anti-imperialist sentiments across the region and coups of a similar anti-neocolonial nature in Burkina Faso and Mali. The two countries declared in a joint statement on July 31 that “any military intervention against Niger is tantamount to a declaration of war against Burkina Faso and Mali” and that should ECOWAS go on to execute its threat, Burkina Faso and Mali will take “self-defense measures in support of the forces, armies and people of Niger.”

Burkina Faso’s interim leader recently spoke at the Russia–Africa Summit in late July, declaring, “We African heads of state must stop behaving like puppets who dance every time the imperialists pull the strings.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/10/ ... -in-niger/

******

France supports ECOWAS actions to intervene in Niger

Image
France does not expressly allude to when the ECOWAS force will be activated to intervene militarily in Niger. | Photo: EFE
Posted 11 August 2023 (7 hours 34 minutes ago)

Weeks ago, the Niger military junta had expressed its concern about a possible foreign military intervention in the country supported by France.

The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared on Thursday, after an emergency summit on the situation in Niger, that it "supports all the conclusions" approved by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) that supports military intervention in the country. African.

According to a statement released on various information platforms, France welcomed the fact that during the summit the member countries "reiterated their determination to restore constitutional and democratic order" in the African country.

“The presidents of Benin, the Ivory Coast, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo, in the presence of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Niger, Mr. Hassoumi Massoudou, reiterated their willingness to restore constitutional and democratic order in Niger, as well as to achieve the immediate release of President Bazoum and his family," it said.


The French text does not expressly allude to when the ECOWAS force will be activated, but it does delve into the demand for the immediate release of President Bazoum, removed from power since he was arrested and taken into custody on July 26.

Bazoum had been in recent years a key ally of the West and, in particular, of France, between issues such as strengthening the fight against terrorism in the Sahel. The new Nigerian authorities, on the other hand, would be closer to the orbit of Russia.


The military coup in Niger was carried out on July 26 by soldiers grouped around the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Fatherland (CNSP). Led by Abdourrahmane Tiani, this military junta announced the removal of the president and the suspension of his institutions.

The Summit held on Thursday brought together the presidents of Benin, the Ivory Coast, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo, as well as the foreign ministers of The Gambia, Liberia and Cape Verde. In addition, the presidents of Burundi and Mauritania and representatives of the African Union and the United Nations attended.

The attendees agreed to “support” “efforts to ensure a speedy restoration of constitutional order” in Niger. Also "activate" the bloc's military reserve force for a possible intervention, although he continued to advocate dialogue.

Weeks ago the Niger military junta had expressed its concern about a possible foreign military intervention in the country supported by France.

Niger has become the fourth West African country led by a military junta, after Mali, Guinea-Conakry and Burkina Faso, where coups d'état also took place between 2020 and 2022.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/francia- ... -0003.html

Google Translator

******

The situation in the Central African Republic for July 30 - August 10, 2023
August 11, 2023
Rybar

Image

In the Central African Republic, regular attacks by gangs on the positions of government forces and Wagner PMCs continue .

Against this background, a referendum was held in the country, which can already be called successful for President Faustin-Archange Touadéra.

clashes

In the northwest, the militants organized an attack on the city of Nana Bakassa . During the battle, government troops had to retreat from the settlement for some time, which caused discontent among the civilian population. However, the city soon returned to the control of the army: three rebels were killed and two were wounded.

In the north-east of the CAR, near the city of Ndele, extremists attacked a village: 13 civilians, including the headman of the village, were killed.

According to local residents, the attack was organized in response to the mayor's decision to call on the local population to take part in the referendum, which local militants had previously ordered to be boycotted.

In the southeast, the UPC group carried out several attacks at once in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe cities of Obo and Mboki : at least six people were killed and five were abducted. The local militia was able to repulse the attack on Obo, but during the fighting, eight people were killed and four were wounded.

The CAR held a referendum on July 30 that would allow President Touadéré to run for a third term in 2025.

The new constitution will also increase the presidential term from five to seven years, introduce the office of vice president, prevent dual nationals from running for president, and dissolve the current Senate .

Although the exact results of the vote will be known no later than August 27, according to the preliminary vote count of August 7, more than 95% of voters supported the new constitution.

The opposition and armed groups boycotted the referendum, calling it illegal. Supporters of Touadéra believe that the proposed changes will help achieve stability and development in the country.

Domestic political situation

There is a rotation and build-up of the forces of “Wagnerites” in the country. Yevgeny Prigozhin said that this is happening in connection with the ongoing referendum.

Foreign publications say that the curtailment of Wagner's forces is not expected , but only their strengthening and continuation of the mission.

On July 31 , the Security Council extended the sanctions for a year , while deciding that the arms embargo, which is part of them, continues to exclude the supply, sale or transfer of weapons and related materiel to the security forces of the Republic.

The Russian Federation and China abstained from the vote and supported the CAR government's demand to completely lift the embargo, as it "impedes Bangui's efforts to combat illegal militias."

CAR Foreign Minister Sylvie Valerie Baipo-Temon thanked Russia and China for their support and expressed dissatisfaction with the decision of the Security Council.

For the first time in more than three years, a humanitarian overland mission consisting of organizations: OXFAM, INTERSOS, AURD, BRIA-LONDO, ESPERANCE, PAM assessed the needs of the population in the area of ​​the city of Yalinga, which is located in the east of the country, and prepared a response plan for the period from April to December 2023.

According to preliminary data, more than 120 incidents of torture, kidnapping, destruction of property, etc. have been documented . The presence of armed groups, unfavorable economic conditions for parents, lack of school infrastructure and qualified teachers resulted in over 60% of children dropping out of school.

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-czentraln ... 2023-goda/

The situation in Nigeria for August 1 - 9, 2023
August 10, 2023
Rybar

Image

In recent weeks, the main focus in the region has been on Niger, as well as on the discussion of a possible intervention by ECOWAS, chaired by Nigerian President Bola Tinubu .

However, the Nigerian Senate rejected Tinubu's decision on a military operation in the Republic of Niger and called for more attention to be paid to the issue of combating terrorism within the country.

Senators opposed to fighting outside of Nigeria have pointed out that the military is extremely ill-equipped and unprepared for war . In this regard, they suggested that the head of state approach the situation in Niger through dialogue.

In support of the theses about the difficult situation in the fight against terrorism in Nigeria, several press releases were published at once about the attacks of ISIS and Boko Haram.

clashes

Terror attacks in Nigeria have killed 48 people, injured 11 and abducted two , according to a report by Egypt's Al-Azhar Observatory to Combat Extremism.

At the same time, the Nigerian Defense Headquarters at a briefing in Abuja said that as a result of military operations throughout the country, 36 terrorists were eliminated in two weeks , 137 criminals were arrested and 140 people were rescued.

The terrorist group Boko Haram killed eight fishermen during an attack on Lake Chad on Cameroon's border with Nigeria. They were accused of spying, as well as infiltrating alleged "hidden territories".

Earlier, after several successful airstrikes , during which several Boko Haram commanders* were eliminated, the militants forbade fishermen and farmers to engage in their fishing in the territories under their control.

During the repulse of an attempted attack by terrorists of the local branch of the Islamic State in West Africa * on the Monguno area in Borno state , the forces of the Combined Task Force (MNJTF) of Operation Hadin Kai were able to destroy a number of militants.

ISIS terrorists on pickup trucks and motorcycles attacked Nigerian troops stationed along the Marte Axis in Monguno, which led to a fierce firefight lasting about 30 minutes.

Domestic political situation

The Senate of Nigeria rejected the decision of the President and Chairman of ECOWAS Bola Tinubu to invade the Republic of Niger and called for more attention to be paid to the issue of combating terrorism inside the country.

Senators opposed to fighting outside of Nigeria have pointed out that the military is extremely ill-equipped and unprepared for war . In this regard, they suggested that the head of state approach the situation in Niger through dialogue.

The head of the Islamic Movement banned in Nigeria and the spiritual leader of the Nigerian Shiites, Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaki , also warned President Bolu Tinubu against invading the Republic of Niger.

According to him , the United States and France should not be allowed to use Nigeria and ECOWAS to "attack our brothers, just to engage in fratricidal genocide."

The self-proclaimed prime minister of the government of the Republic of Biafra in exile and the head of the Indigenous Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) rebel movement, Simon Ekpa , made a video message to the "new pan-African revolutionary leaders."

In his message, the separatist leader said that in the event of an ECOWAS invasion, the Eastern Security Network (ESN) and the Biafra Liberation Army (BLA) would fight on the side of Niger, Burkina Faso and Mali "in the name of freedom and pan-Africanism."

Economic problems

A new report released by World of Statistics has revealed that the Federal Republic of Nigeria is currently the world's leading country in terms of unemployment. So it is in the lead among other countries with 33.3% .

Also, a recent report from consulting firm KPMG notes that the unemployment rate in Nigeria rose to 37.7% in 2022 and will rise further to 40.6% by the end of 2023.

Nigeria's currency, the naira , hit a new low of 900 NGN per US dollar in a parallel market on August 8, 2023, when demand for foreign currency outstripped supply.

In contrast, the official window for investors and exporters fixed an exchange rate of NGN 774.78 per US dollar at the end of the business day.

Nigerian businessmen in the border regions say the West African ECOWAS sanctions on Niger are affecting their livelihoods.

They are calling for a reconsideration of restrictions against Niger, as the closure of land borders has affected their business and the cost of living has risen due to the lack of goods imported into Nigeria from a neighboring country.

At the Zenith Bank 2023 International Trade Seminar on Tuesday, Nigeria's interim central bank governor, Folashodun Shonubi , said the country's inflation rate is higher than most African nations.

* Grouping is prohibited in the Russian Federation

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-nigerii-z ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator

******

Niger Blasts NATO’s Global Narrative Wide Open

Declan Hayes
August 10, 2023

Niger’s coup leaders believe they must first rid the region of the French and American military and then boot out their fifth columnists in the military, the media and the NGOs.

Niger’s recent coup follows similar coups in nearby Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea, each of which was led by military leaders opposed to the presence of French and U.S. occupation troops stationed there to ensure NATO’s continued economic rape of their respective homelands.

The Sahel, the region of Africa housing these four (and other coup-prone) countries, has been assailed with a number of economic factors, which have combined to give us this current stand-off between those military leaders on the one hand and the NATO war machine and its regional auxiliaries on the other.

These factors include Africa’s ballooning population, which has put increased pressure on the relatively small part of Africa’s abundant resources, which the locals are allowed subsist from; ever increasing droughts, which have increased tribal tensions over grazing lands; NATO’s increasing recourse to their ISIS card to justify both their military presence and their economic pillage of the region; and, finally, the mass migration towards Europe and concomitant crimes which NATO’s destruction of the entire region has caused.

Although Western economists and their regional apologists have proposed all sorts of self-serving solutions to these inter-twined problems, Niger’s coup leaders believe they must first rid the region of the French and American military and then boot out their fifth columnists in the military, the media and the NGOs.

Most fair-minded people would say that the coup leaders have a good argument, and one that is boosted by the widespread public support they enjoy and the deplorable track record of the French and American vultures who hover over them.

Their local opposition include such NATO stalwarts as Senegal’s political mafia, who rant that the loss of democracy in Niger is a casus belli, even as they jail their own opposition, ban their parties, and scrub them from the internet.

This “Coalition of the Willing” gang of collaborators in headed by Nigeria’s Bola Tinubu, who first made his millions laundering the profits of the CIA’s Chicago heroin dealers before returning to Lagos where he has been involved in almost every one of the never-ending major scams that plague that resource-rich country. When Niger’s leaders tell that bum to first clean up his own domestic mess, they have a point.

And it is one that the locals right across Africa see, along with the faux demands for human rights NATO’s proxies dutifully bleat when prodded by their masters to do so. Now that Uganda has discovered huge gold reserves, long time MI6 asset Peter Tatchell is bleating away about the hard life minor attracted persons have in Uganda. Nothing, of course, about the ordinary hard working Ugandan or Rwandan, who is under the boot of MI6’s Paul Kagame, a bosom buddy of Tony Blair and a major sponsor of, of all things, Arsenal Football Club.

Wherever we or, more importantly, Africans look, we see the same hoary hands all over that vast land mass and, in the Sahel, those hands are primarily those of France and the cut throats of the French Foreign Legion, whose duty it is to put all African upstarts to the sword.

And, make no mistake about it, if the French decide to go in hard, they will prevail. In previous spats in what they pompously see as their own African backyard, they wiped out the air force of the Ivory Coast in a matter of minutes. There is absolutely no way Niger and her allies, even with Algeria getting involved from the north, can prevail in a conventional war. NATO has been down this road many times before and they know how to engineer such catastrophes to their advantage.

But what NATO cannot handle is the emergence of two other key vectors in Africa. The first of these is Russia’s military and economic presence and the second and more important of them is emerging intra African patriotic networks.

Wagner boss Yevgeny Prigozhin, in a recent well-balanced Russia Today article NATO censorship precludes me from linking to, has spelled out the reasons why this current French economic exploitation cannot prevail; a system whereby France takes over 95% of the profits and leaves Niger with less than 5% of their own wealth is simply not sustainable, no matter how much ISIS terrorism France and its NATO allies sponsor in the Sahel.

Josep Borrell’s predictably stupid comment that the Sahel should not accept free Russian grain would have some validity if his European Union mafia had not deprived Africa of the hard currency to pay for Russian or other grain. If Borrell was not living in the same cuckoo land as von der Leyen, Macron and America’s other European puppets, he would know that Africans are happy for Russian or any other genuine aid.

Not that Russia aid or, for that matter, Russia, can solve the Sahel’s problems. In a recent well-balanced article in Russia Today NATO censorship precludes me from linking to, Andrey Maslov and Vsevolod Sviridov, both of whom hail from Russia’s HSE University, spelt out the huge economic problems Niger’s coup leaders will have to overcome to put their country on an even keel once they rid their land of its French and American vultures.

Although Russia is now a major African vector that cannot be ignored, there is a much more important and immediate one. And that is, like Julius Caesar of old, because Niger’s leaders have crossed their own Rubicon, there can now be no backwards retreat. The fact of the matter is Niger is now home to a network of genuinely patriotic African military officers who have linked up with their confreres in contiguous countries and that network is a powerful force which, if it prevails, augurs very well not just for the future of Niger but for all of Africa.

As NATO’s warlords have crashed headlong into a reinforced Russian steel wall in Ukraine, those of them who can read could do worse than grapple with Tacitus’ account of Agricola’s British campaign, where the Britons were no match for Rome’s legions and Rome’s logistics.

Crucially, most of Rome’s cut throats were not Romans but were, like the French Foreign Legion, auxilia, auxiliaries, big bruisers from Gaul, Balearic slingers, Numidian cavalry, Syrian archers and Thracian multi-taskers.

Although Roman citizens were at the heart of their legions, those auxiliaries were significant force multipliers, not least, because in Tacitus’ words “victory would be vastly more glorious if won without the loss of Roman blood”.

In Niger’s case, because some of France’s key auxiliaries are jumping ship, Macron can no longer avail of their cut price blood. Daoud Yaya Brahim, the Chadian Defence Minister, has said his country will play no part in any French-led re-conquest of Niger. With Algerian president, Abdelmadjid Taboun declaring that any attack on Niger, with which Algeria shares a 1000 km border, is an attack on Algeria, France will need something more than their discredited Leclerc tanks and cut price auxiliaries to carry the day on Niger’s northern front.

The military governments of Burkino Faso, Guinea, Mali and Niger have decided to hang together, rather than allow NATO and its local auxiliaries to again hang them one by one. If we take that alliance as our pivotal point, then the U.S., France and their local auxiliaries have a major headache on their hands for, even if they should prevail in a military conflict, they will, at the very least, have a major bush war on their hands. And, given that Algeria has promised to weigh in, who knows what else might catch fire?

The difference between Rome at its height and today’s America is the Romans knew how to properly plan in advance and not push their luck beyond reasonable bounds. Thus, Agricola’s British campaign was preceded by years of planning to ensure supplies were in place and expendable allies were secured. And, though Agricola figured, perhaps correctly, he could roll Ireland over with a single, solitary legion and a smattering of auxiliaries, wiser heads prevailed and Ireland was spared the Pax Romana, if not today’s equally abominable Pax Americana, which has cut an unwelcome swathe through Africa, as it has globally.

Ex Africa Semper Aliquid Novi, from Africa always something new, Pliny the Elder told us shortly after Jesus expired. There is certainly something new afoot in Africa today and that something is le Pays des Hommes Intègres’ studied thirst for liberté, égalité et fraternité which, thanks to gallant allies in Russia and especially throughout the Africa of Ologbosere and Sankara, NATO’s over-extended empire can no longer deny or defer.

https://strategic-culture.org/news/2023 ... wide-open/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 12, 2023 1:53 pm

Image

ECOWAS approves military action in Niger ‘as soon as possible’
Originally published: Al Mayadeen on August 11, 2023 by Agencies (more by Al Mayadeen) | (Posted Aug 12, 2023)

ECOWAS has approved a military attack on Niger “as soon as possible” to remove the new leadership and restore Western-backed President Mohamed Bazoum, who was ousted in a coup last month, Ivory Coast’s President Alassane Ouattara said Thursday.

“The Chiefs of Staff will have other conferences to finalize things but they have the agreement of the Conference of Heads of State for the operation to start as soon as possible,” said Ouattara after attending the bloc’s emergency summit in Nigeria.

Ouattara announced that his country will be providing an armed force of 850 to 1,100, alongside Nigeria and Benin, adding that other West African countries will also be contributing.

Earlier today, ECOWAS members said they would be deploying a “standby force” as part of their plan to carry out military action against neighboring Niger.

“We are determined to restore president Bazoum to his functions,” Ouattara said.

Before leaving the summit, Ivory Coast’s leader said that ECOWAS “has intervened in the past, in Liberia, in Sierra Leone, in Gambia and Guinea-Bissau” when security was allegedly threatened in these countries.

Today we have a similar situation in Niger, and I like to say that ECOWAS cannot accept this.

ECOWAS had previously given the coup leadership in Niger a one-week deadline – which ended last Sunday – to surrender to the bloc’s terms or else face a military operation. The delayed action came amid reports of a number of internal hurdles within the countries of the West African bodies – most notably the Senate opposition in Nigeria.

Amid these threats, Mali and Burkina Faso stated that any attack on Niger would be considered a declaration of war against them.

The bloc announced on Tuesday that it has the capacity to deploy 25,000 troops in order to invade Niger and reinstate ousted President Mohamed Bazoum back in power.

On Wednesday, Antinekar Al-Hassan, a political advisor of Bazoum, warned that a military attack on Niger might bring all of Africa up in flames, stressing that ECOWAS is unaware of the price of such a mistake.

In a joint letter dated August 8, former presidents and prime ministers of Niger urged ECOWAS to lift sanctions on the country and resort to diplomatic approaches to resolve the escalating tensions.

“We… are asking you to lift sanctions against the people of Niger and use diplomatic and political means to find together with the military peaceful and constructive solutions to this serious crisis suffered by our country,” the letter read.

https://mronline.org/2023/08/12/ecowas- ... -possible/

South African police attack and arrest striking workers at Ekapa diamond mines

Hundreds of NUMSA members began a strike at the Ekapa diamond mines on August 7. On August 10, police forces arrested 43 striking workers after attacking the picket line with water cannons and tear gas

August 11, 2023 by Peoples Dispatch

Image
NUMSA members on strike at the Ekapa diamond mines in the Northern Cape province. (Photo: NUMSA)

Almost 700 workers employed at the Ekapa diamond mines in South Africa’s Northern Cape province began an indefinite strike on August 7. Organized by the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA), workers have downed their tools in rejection of the “starvation wage” they are currently being paid.

On Thursday, August 10, as workers were picketing outside the mines, formerly owned by the De Beers mining company, the police deployed water cannons and fired tear gas in an attempt to disperse them. Police then proceeded to arrest 43 workers, NUMSA regional organizer Tshepo Mokhele, who was present at the picket, told Peoples Dispatch. The workers were granted bail on August 11.

NUMSA issued a 48-hour strike notice to Ekapa on August 4, following which the company threatened to lock out workers if they went ahead with the action, the union said in a statement on August 7. The striking workers, which include permanent, contractual, and trainee workers, represent over half of the 1,200 workers employed at the mine.

Among the key demands being raised by the workers is a 17% wage increase and an entry level salary of R17,500 (USD 930.2). Workers have also sought a one-off payment of ex gratia funds amounting to R10,000 (USD 530.1).

Image
Hundreds of NUMSA members working at the Ekapa diamond mines launched an indefinite strike on August 7. (Photo: NUMSA)

According to NUMSA, the current entry level salary is R5,700 (USD 302.9) per month. For context, the cost of an average household food basket for the month of July, as calculated by the Pietermaritzburg Economic Justice and Dignity (PMBEJD) group, stood at R5,082.94 (USD 270).

Workers have also demanded that the housing allowance be increased to R2850 (USD 151.3) and medical allowance to R2650 (USD 140.6) per month. They have asked for an agreement for one year, back-dated to March 1.

Ekapa responded with a counter-offer of a 6.5% wage increase and a three-year agreement. Meanwhile, the company has provided a 17% wage increase solely for workers in the “C-band” category (which includes workers who are qualified to conduct blasting operations in the mines).

“NUMSA condemns the mine management for dividing workers…Our members are earning peanuts, whilst they are also expected to risk their lives underground mining for diamonds,” NUMSA General Secretary Irvin Jim said in a statement.

After the strike began, Jim tried to engage with the chief executive at Ekapa mines attempting find a solution but the “CEO was very arrogant and did not want to budge on any of these demands,” Mokhele said.

“For the last five years the employers have not implemented any effective wage increase for the workers…their salaries have been stagnant. The employers have not put on the table an increase that will sustain the livelihoods of these comrades.”

As the workers continue their picket, Ekapa has sought an interim interdiction, the court hearing for which is scheduled for September 11.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/11/ ... ond-mines/

******

The situation in the African Sahel for August 1 - 11, 2023
August 11, 2023
Rybar

Image

Clashes continue in the region between militants of the local branch of the Islamic State * and the al-Qaeda affiliate * Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin *, as well as government forces.

The greatest problems in the field of internal security remain in the " triple border " area. Terrorist groups have increased the number of attacks on settlements and positions of government troops.

Delegations from Mali and Burkina Faso have said they will not support military intervention in Niger , while ECOWAS officials continue to issue threats to invade the Republic.

Mali

Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin militants attacked the village of Bodio in the Mopti region. She was burned. At least 17 people were killed and about a dozen were kidnapped. The remaining residents were forced to temporarily leave it.

Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin also reported clashes with government troops and Wagner PMC fighters in the Bandiagara area in the Mopti region.

According to the statement of the terrorist group, the militants besieged the village of Boni , where the military personnel of the Mali Armed Forces and the Wagnerites were located, but no confirmation was provided.

Several Malian soldiers were killed during an ambush by Islamic State militants in the northeastern region of Menaka on an army convoy bound for Niger to escort trucks.

IS supporters attacked the Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin base in the Kisi Bel settlement in the Timbuktu region. This happened after the attack of al-Qaeda militants on areas controlled by the Islamic State.

Also in the rural district of Anderambukan in the Menaka region of northeastern Mali, IS terrorists executed two local residents on charges of collaborating with Wagner PMCs as informers.

The Malian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has indefinitely suspended the issuance of visas to French citizens at its embassy in Paris . The statement said the move was mutual.

France previously suspended visa issuance and closed the visa application center at its embassy in Mali's capital city of Bamako after the entire African country was placed in a " red zone " where travel is strongly discouraged.

The government of Mali ratified a new constitution on 23 January 2023 that demoted French from an official language to a working language . Article 31 now has 13 official languages.

Burkina Faso

In the city of Nohao in the south of Bulgu province, unidentified persons attacked and looted a convoy of commercial trucks, killing at least 20 people. No terrorist group has claimed responsibility.

Usually behind such attacks in Burkina Faso are radicals from Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin and Ansar ul-Islam *, who have recently increased the number of attacks on civilians.

France is suspending all its budgetary and development assistance to Burkina Faso until further notice , according to the French Foreign Ministry.

The decision came after the military government of Burkina Faso said it would regard any armed intervention against neighboring Niger as a declaration of war .

The head of the interim government of the Republic of Niger, Divisional General Salifu Modi met with the President of the transitional period of Burkina Faso, Captain Ibrahim Traore , during the visit of a joint delegation from Burkina Faso and Mali to Niger.

General Salifu Modi said Niger received very strong support from Burkina Faso and Mali in the face of ECOWAS West African bloc sanctions and assurances of military assistance against invasion threats.

Niger

The Republic of Niger continues to face many security challenges . Radical terrorist groups and organized bandit groups are operating in the country.

At the same time, Niger is undergoing a new political development . The country's authorities, represented by the National Council for the Defense of the Motherland, have appointed Ali Mahamana Lamin Zein as the new prime minister.

It is worth noting that Ali Lamine Zein is familiar with public administration. Under President Mamadou Tanja, he served as Minister of Economy and Finance, which made a significant contribution to improving the economic situation in the country.

In this context, a list of members of the transitional government was published . The new cabinet of ministers consists of 21 people.

Niger Poste CEO Idriss Kane , son of Niger's ambassador to France, diplomat Aishat Bulama Kane , was arrested in the capital, Niamey , on charges of embezzlement of public funds.

A number of trade unionists, officials from the previous government, and separatist leaders announced the formation of a "Council of Resistance for the Republic" . This was announced in his address by the representative of the movement Usman Abdul Mumuni .

In turn, the former head of the Tuareg rebels and one of the political leaders under President Mahamadou Issoufou Rissa Ag Bula published the Founding Declaration of the Resistance Council for the Republic .

The movement said in a statement that the organization aims to "work to restore order, constitutional legitimacy and President Mohamed Bazum to the full extent of its functions."

The ECOWAS and UEMOA embargo measures against Niger are beginning to have an impact on the daily lives of the country's population, with a significant jump in the prices of basic necessities.

Merchants in Niger have taken advantage of the border closure to drive up the price of goods for most consumers, even though these are old stocks that were already available before the border closure.

ECOWAS continues to threaten intervention in the Republic of Niger. However, despite all the previous ultimatums, ECOWAS does not have sufficient forces for a large-scale military operation .

In this regard, the organization expects support from France, which does not have the logistical capabilities to transport the necessary goods.

In turn, the United States is not yet interested in hostilities in Niger . Washington has taken a wait-and-see attitude due to fears for its military infrastructure in the African country.

* Grouping is prohibited in the Russian Federation

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-afrikansk ... 2023-goda/

The situation in the Central African Republic for July 30 - August 10, 2023
August 11, 2023
Rybar
The situation in the Central African Republic for July 30 - August 10, 2023

Image

In the Central African Republic, regular attacks by gangs on the positions of government forces and Wagner PMCs continue .

Against this background, a referendum was held in the country, which can already be called successful for President Faustin-Archange Touadéra.

clashes

In the northwest, the militants organized an attack on the city of Nana Bakassa . During the battle, government troops had to retreat from the settlement for some time, which caused discontent among the civilian population. However, the city soon returned to the control of the army: three rebels were killed and two were wounded.

In the north-east of the CAR, near the city of Ndele, extremists attacked a village: 13 civilians, including the headman of the village, were killed.

According to local residents, the attack was organized in response to the mayor's decision to call on the local population to take part in the referendum, which local militants had previously ordered to be boycotted.

In the southeast, the UPC group carried out several attacks at once in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe cities of Obo and Mboki : at least six people were killed and five were abducted. The local militia was able to repulse the attack on Obo, but during the fighting, eight people were killed and four were wounded.

The CAR held a referendum on July 30 that would allow President Touadéré to run for a third term in 2025.

The new constitution will also increase the presidential term from five to seven years, introduce the office of vice president, prevent dual nationals from running for president, and dissolve the current Senate .

Although the exact results of the vote will be known no later than August 27, according to the preliminary vote count of August 7, more than 95% of voters supported the new constitution.

The opposition and armed groups boycotted the referendum, calling it illegal. Supporters of Touadéra believe that the proposed changes will help achieve stability and development in the country.

Domestic political situation

There is a rotation and build-up of the forces of “Wagnerites” in the country. Yevgeny Prigozhin said that this is happening in connection with the ongoing referendum.

Foreign publications say that the curtailment of Wagner's forces is not expected , but only their strengthening and continuation of the mission.

On July 31 , the Security Council extended the sanctions for a year , while deciding that the arms embargo, which is part of them, continues to exclude the supply, sale or transfer of weapons and related materiel to the security forces of the Republic.

The Russian Federation and China abstained from the vote and supported the CAR government's demand to completely lift the embargo, as it "impedes Bangui's efforts to combat illegal militias."

CAR Foreign Minister Sylvie Valerie Baipo-Temon thanked Russia and China for their support and expressed dissatisfaction with the decision of the Security Council.

For the first time in more than three years, a humanitarian overland mission consisting of organizations: OXFAM, INTERSOS, AURD, BRIA-LONDO, ESPERANCE, PAM assessed the needs of the population in the area of ​​the city of Yalinga, which is located in the east of the country, and prepared a response plan for the period from April to December 2023.

According to preliminary data, more than 120 incidents of torture, kidnapping, destruction of property, etc. have been documented . The presence of armed groups, unfavorable economic conditions for parents, lack of school infrastructure and qualified teachers resulted in over 60% of children dropping out of school.

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-czentraln ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Mon Aug 14, 2023 2:37 pm

Niger Junta To Prosecute President Bazoum for High Treason

Image
President Mohamed Bazoum. Aug. 14, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@upstract

Published 14 August 2023 (7 hours 52 minutes ago)

"So far, the government of Niger has gathered... evidence to prosecute the deposed president and his local and foreign accomplices..."


On Sunday, the perpetrators of the coup in Niger against President Mohamed Bazoum announced their intention to prosecute the ousted leader for high treason and undermining the country's security, in a statement read on national television.

"So far, the government of Niger has gathered... evidence to prosecute the deposed president and his local and foreign accomplices before the competent national and international bodies for high treason and undermining Niger's internal and external security," said Major Colonel Amadou Abdramane.

Hours earlier, the head of a religious delegation of mediators indicated that the leader of the military junta is ready to consider a diplomatic solution to the country's standoff with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) bloc.

ECOWAS also approved the deployment of a "standby force to restore constitutional order" in Niger as soon as possible, but remains committed to finding a diplomatic solution to the crisis.


Furthermore, ECOWAS has not ruled out the use of force against the army officers who overthrew Niger's elected leader, Mohamed Bazoum, on July 26.

Coup leader Gen. Abdourahamane Tiani "said his doors were open to explore diplomacy and peace to resolve the matter," Sheikh Bala Lau said, a day after his Niger Muslim delegation held talks in the capital, Niamey.

Officials at the head of the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland (CNSP) in Niger allege that the coup against President Mohamed Bazoum was due to the "continuous deterioration of the security situation" and "economic and social mismanagement."

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Nig ... -0003.html

******

The situation in Somalia for August 1-11, 2023
August 12, 2023
Rybar

Image

Cashes continue in Somalia between government forces and al-Shabaab militants *. The country's government is preparing to conduct a military operation to finally destroy the positions of terrorists in the central regions of Somalia.

In parallel with this, clashes took place in Somaliland between the armed forces of the unrecognized state and the newly formed "Mount Gaanliba rebels" .

Al-Shabaab attacks
In the capital of Somalia, Mogadishu, Islamic radicals blew up a remote-controlled mine. The target of the attack was a military motorcade: five soldiers and 3 civilians were killed. Terrorists from the Al-Shabaab group claim six dead military personnel.

Another terrorist act took place in the central part of the country in the city of Jalalaksi. A suicide bomber blew himself up in a restaurant in the center of the city, where the Jalalaksi District Commissioner Nor Mohamed Nor Dhere was located . The explosion killed eight people and injured more than ten. Nor Dkhere himself was not injured.

Somali National Army offensive
Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mahmoud met with clan leaders in the central regions of Galgadud and Mudug amid military mobilization to launch a new offensive against al-Shabaab positions.

At the moment, the president is in the city of Dusamareb , from where he plans to give an order to start a military operation to eliminate radicals in the central regions and where he will stay until the very end of the operation to maintain the morale of the soldiers.

In the central part of the country, terrorist cells were liquidated in the area of ​​the cities of Bulobarde and Mukayle . As a result of the operation, at least 25 militants and 16 vehicles containing explosives were destroyed.

The Somali National Army attacked an Al-Shabaab hideout where explosives were made in the city of Galhareri . As a result of the attack, seven vehicles, a warehouse of weapons and medical equipment of the terrorists were destroyed.

The situation in Somaliland and Puntland
The Somaliland opposition did not come to the President's meeting with the political parties.

The conflict flared up over a succession of party and presidential elections. The president of the unrecognized state, Musa Bihi Abdi , claims that party elections should precede presidential elections, with which the opposition does not agree.

In parallel with this, part of the military who deserted from the Somaliland armed forces formed a group of "mountain Gaanliba rebels" in the central part of the unrecognized state.

The rebels said they would fight the repressive Abdi regime , which they believe is suppressing opposition, oppressing civilians and destroying the economy. In the first attack near the city of Go'da Yar , the insurgents killed nine police officers, wounded 17 and destroyed two vehicles.

Somaliland Interior Minister Mohamed Kahin Ahmed accused the opposition of aiding the newly formed rebel group.

The Puntland government accused the Somali government of depriving it of its share of international aid.

The Puntland Ministry of Finance has accused the Somali government of wasting aid funds for Somalis on arms purchases.

Epidemiological situation
The World Health Organization has announced it is stepping up measures to prevent the spread of cholera in Somalia after 30 people have died from the disease since January last year.

In its weekly report, the WHO said that since the first epidemiological week of 2023, 11,704 suspected cases of the disease have been reported in 28 districts of Somalia.

Foreign policy relations
Somali Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre held a working meeting with US Deputy Ambassador to Somalia Shane Dixon, during which the parties discussed strengthening military cooperation, as well as preparing for a new phase of the war against Al-Shabaab

Qatar sent a special envoy from Foreign Minister Mutlaq ibn Majid al-Qahtani to Somalia . During his visit, he laid the capital of Somaliland, Hargeisa , met with President Abdi and discussed with him the opening of a diplomatic mission of Qatar in the capital of an unrecognized state.

Following this, the envoy arrived in Mogadishu to discuss reaching an agreement on elections in Somalia and cooperation in the fight against terrorism.

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-somali-za ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 16, 2023 2:24 pm

Niger: The US Dilemma
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 15, 2023
Scott Ritter

Image

Washington can’t sever relations with the post-coup government lest it lose the basis for its military presence in the African country

Last week, Acting Deputy Secretary of State for the United States Victoria Nuland made her third visit to Niger in the past two years. This time, Nuland was in the African country to respond to the July 26 military coup, which saw the ouster of the constitutionally-elected President Mohamed Bazoum by a group of military officers, operating under the umbrella of the newly-formed National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland, led by the commander of the presidential guard, General Abdourahmane Tchiani, who subsequently declared himself to be the new head of state.

Nuland had sought a meeting with the ousted president, Bazoum, as well as the leader of the new military government, General Tchiani. She was denied both, and instead held a very strained dialogue with Tchiani’s military chief, General Moussa Salaou Barmou, who headed a delegation of lesser officers. Nuland called the talks with Barmou “frank” and “difficult.” What she did not do, however, was call a spade a spade, refusing to label the Nigerien coup a coup, but rather treating it as temporary domestic political mishap which, with a little bit of US-applied pressure from the right source, could be overcome.

The reasoning behind the American game of semantics is that, by law, if the US recognizes the Nigerien coup as a coup, then it must cease all military-to-military interactions between a force of some 1,100 US military personnel currently stationed in Niger, and their Nigerien military counterparts, as well as all other forms of US-funded aid. The law in question, known as Section 7008 (of Public Law 117-328, Division K), specifically states that no funds appropriated by Congress in support of State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs (SFOPS) “shall be obligated or expended to finance directly any assistance to the government of any country whose duly elected head of government is deposed by military coup d’état or decree.”

During her 2-hour discussions with the Tchiani government delegation, Nuland made it clear that while US relations were currently suspended, they were not permanently halted. In a post-meeting video press conference, Nuland emphasized the consequences of the failure to return President Bazoum to power with General Barmou, a Nigerien special forces officer who had been trained at US military schools and had extensive interaction with US military trainers in Niger. Barmou’s personal experience with the US military is in many ways the personification of a relationship that today serves as the foundation of America’s military presence and mission in West Africa.

The US, France, and other European partners have been engaged in a years-long campaign, together with their West African partners, to combat Islamic extremism in the Sahel region of Africa. Niger, which hosts two major US bases, one outside the Nigerien capital of Niamey known as Base 101, and a second, Air Base 201, in Agadez – a city located on the southern edge of the Sahara. Both bases support US intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) operations conducted by MQ-9 Reaper drones and fixed-wing aircraft flown by a Joint Special Operations Aviation Detachment, as well as other US military operations, including military airlift and special forces training detachments (France also maintains a significant military presence in Niger, numbering over 1,000, and there are several hundred other military personnel from a variety of European Union (EU) nations.

With the collapse of the US, French, EU, and United Nations military presence in neighboring Mali, and in the aftermath of a military coup in Chad, Niger has emerged as the last remaining bastion of the US-led anti-terrorism effort in the Sahel. If the US were to cut relations with Niger because of the coup, there would be no Western-oriented anti-terrorism efforts remaining to counter the threat of Al Qaeda and Islamic State terrorism in the region.

From Washington’s perspective, the greatest threat that would emerge from any break in the military-to-military assistance between the US and Niger is not the potential spread of Islamic fundamentalist-inspired terrorism, but rather Russian influence, especially in the form of military security support allegedly provided by Wagner Group, a private military company whose African operations appear to operate in sync with Russian foreign policy objectives (neither the Kremlin nor the Tchiani government has commented on the reports of Wagner activities in Niger).

Prior to last month’s Russian-African Summit, Prigozhin had met with Wagner forces who had relocated to Belarus in the aftermath of the abortive June 23-24 insurrection – which resulted in halting Wagner operations in Donbass – during which he emphasized the importance Africa would play in future Wagner activities. Wagner’s presence has been reported in several African countries, including the Central African Republic, Libya, and Mali. Members of the senior leadership of the Nigerien coup have reportedly met with Wagner officials in Mali, to discuss security cooperation between Wagner and Niger. During her meeting with the Nigerien coup government, Victoria Nuland singled out the potential deployment of Wagner into Niger as a worrisome development and indicated that she pressed upon her Nigerien counterparts her assessment regarding the detrimental role played by Wagner regarding African security. The reported meeting between Wagner and Niger representatives indicates that Nuland’s message did not resonate with her Nigerien hosts.

The US appears to be caught in the horns of a dilemma, trying to balance a desire to maintain relations with a nation whose government cannot legally receive US aid, and the consequences that would accrue if US-Niger relations were severed, as required by Section 7008. There is an option that neither Nuland nor her boss, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, have yet given voice to. In early 2003, the US Congress amended Section 7008 to provide for the Secretary of State to seek a waiver on the grounds of the “national security interests of the United States.”

There are two major obstacles for the US when it comes to any such waiver. First is the amount of political capital that the US has expended in trying to return President Bazoum to power – to reverse now would be the kind of nod to Realpolitik that the Biden administration is loath to do. Second is the fact that Niger, having evaluated its options going forward, may no longer be interested in maintaining the close relations it previously enjoyed with the US. Niger, like Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea before it, has thrown off the mantle of its post-colonial relationship with France, a relationship that was closely linked with US national security policy in West Africa and the Sahel. The clock is ticking on the fate of US-Niger relations, and there seems to be little Victoria Nuland or any American official can do to change the outcome.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... s-dilemma/

*****

Eritrea Celebrates Freedom
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist 09 Aug 2023

Image
Image: Eritrea Ministry of Information

Eritrea is an example of an independent and self-determining African state. Its people are rightly proud of their history.

I was honored to speak at the 49th annual National Council of Eritrean Americans conference and festival recently held in Tacoma, Washington. Black Agenda Report has always been a staunch defender of the rights of the Eritrean people to live free from U.S. domination. BAR exposes the lies that are told about that nation by the U.S. and their partners in corporate media. The late Glen Ford was especially keen to explain why this country, which is referred to as a “prison camp” and which is described in the most negative and inaccurate ways possible, is in fact a functioning state which overcomes the hardships created by U.S. sanctions to care for its people.

Eritrea is a small nation on the Horn of Africa with a population of only 6 million people. In 1991 it emerged as an independent country after years of war with Ethiopia and is decidedly socialist, which is why the U.S. has remained so hostile to its existence.

The U.S. has waged an unrelenting attack using unilateral coercive measures, commonly known as sanctions, against Eritrea. Eritrea is barred from using the SWIFT financial transactions system, which creates not only financial hardships but which even makes it difficult to send medicines and medical equipment.

The goal of these persecutions is to punish Eritrea for its determination to be socialist and independent of U.S. influence. The only African nations free of entanglements with the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) are Eritrea and Zimbabwe. This refusal to go along with the imperialist agenda has placed Eritrea firmly in the crosshairs of the U.S.

Of course the state uses its operatives in corporate media to assist in their destabilization effort. It even uses the name of another demonized country as part of its smear campaign. Eritrea is called the North Korea of Africa, which is a tactic to either erase it from consideration as a nation inhabited by human beings with rights, and to establish it as a pariah to be ignored or perhaps even destroyed as a regime change target.

In my remarks I spoke of the need for independent media such as Black Agenda Report to act as journalists should, being skeptical of official narratives and seeking out information from those who are being attacked. Invariably one finds that the amplified voices are those of de facto agents of the state who work to spread war propaganda whenever they are told to do so.

While Kenya agrees to participate in the impending occupation of Haiti, and nations of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) act as directed by Washington to sanction and even wage war against Niger, Eritrea is celebrating its independence from foreign control. The U.S. and the rest of what is known as the western world, engage in continued hostility against Eritrea because it insists upon being a fully sovereign nation. Self-determination is the last thing that Washington wants. Domination is always their goal and so the process of trying to crush those countries that refuse to be dominated continues.

The conference and festival were an opportunity for Eritreans in this country to celebrate their homeland, its history, and the culture of the nine ethnic groups who live there. They are portrayed as people who fled state oppression and yet they are quite proud even as they live elsewhere. Of course U.S. destabilization always brings displacement as people in the targeted nation become refugees fleeing the hardships that Washington instigates.

Eritrea has succeeded where others have failed. Washington and its minions are quite serious about exerting control over African nations. When leaders who act on behalf of their people rise up, they are often brought down by concerted effort from the U.S. and its colonizer partners. Such was the fate of Patrice Lumumba, Kwame Nkrumah, and Thomas Sankara to name just a few. Those Africans who succeed in working for and maintaining an independent path should be studied so that their successes can be replicated. Eritrea’s exclusion from Biden’s 2022 summit with African nations was further proof that it is working for the benefit of its people and ultimately for all African people.

Attending the Eritrean American festival was a proud moment, a legacy of Glen Ford’s work and of the connections he forged with that community. Enhancing those ties is a necessity for anyone who claims a Pan-African orientation. The Eritrean people are definitely showing the way for anyone interested in African self-determination.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/eritr ... es-freedom

******

What’s happening in Niger is far from a typical coup
The recent wave of coups in West Africa must be understood in the context of widespread discontent with the ruling elites and their collaboration with imperialism

August 15, 2023 by Vijay Prashad

Image
Protesters with sign that reads: Down with France, long live the CNSP (National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland).

On July 26, 2023, Niger’s presidential guard moved against the sitting president—Mohamed Bazoum—and conducted a coup d’état. A brief contest among the various armed forces in the country ended with all the branches agreeing to the removal of Bazoum and the creation of a military junta led by Presidential Guard Commander General Abdourahamane “Omar” Tchiani. This is the fourth country in the Sahel region of Africa to have experienced a coup—the other three being Burkina Faso, Guinea, and Mali. The new government announced that it would stop allowing France to leech Niger’s uranium (one in three lightbulbs in France is powered by the uranium from the field in Arlit, northern Niger). Tchiani’s government revoked all military cooperation with France, which means that the 1,500 French troops will need to start packing their bags (as they did in both Burkina Faso and Mali). Meanwhile, there has been no public statement about Airbase 201, the US facility in Agadez, a thousand kilometers from the country’s capital of Niamey. This is the largest drone base in the world and key to US operations across the Sahel. US troops have been told to remain on the base for now and drone flights have been suspended. The coup is certainly against the French presence in Niger, but this anti-French sentiment has not enveloped the US military footprint in the country.

Interventions
Hours after the coup was stabilized, the main Western states—especially France and the United States—condemned the coup and asked for the reinstatement of Bazoum, who was immediately detained by the new government. But neither France nor the United States appeared to want to lead the response to the coup. Earlier this year, the French and US governments worried about an insurgency in northern Mozambique that impacted the assets of the Total-Exxon natural gas field off the coastline of Cabo Delgado. Rather than send in French and US troops, which would have polarized the population and increased anti-Western sentiment, the French and the United States made a deal for Rwanda to send its troops into Mozambique. Rwandan troops entered the northern province of Mozambique and shut down the insurgency. Both Western powers seem to favor a “Rwanda” type solution to the coup in Niger, but rather than have Rwanda enter Niger the hope was for ECOWAS—the Economic Community of West African States—to send in its force to restore Bazoum.

A day after the coup, ECOWAS condemned the coup. ECOWAS encompasses fifteen West African states, which in the past few years has suspended Burkina Faso and Mali from their ranks because of the coups in that country; Niger was also suspended from ECOWAS a few days after the coup. Formed in 1975 as an economic bloc, the grouping decided—despite no mandate in its original mission—to send in peacekeeping forces in 1990 into the heart of the Liberian Civil War. Since then, ECOWAS has sent its peacekeeping troops to several countries in the region, including Sierra Leone and Gambia. Not long after the coup in Niger, ECOWAS placed an embargo on the country that included suspending its right to basic commercial transactions with its neighbors, freezing Niger’s central bank assets that are held in regional banks, and stopping foreign aid (which comprises forty percent of Niger’s budget). The most striking statement was that ECOWAS would take “all measures necessary to restore constitutional order.” An August 6 deadline given by ECOWAS expired because the bloc could not agree to send troops across the border. ECOWAS asked for a “standby force” to be assembled and ready to invade Niger. Then, ECOWAS said it would meet on August 12 in Accra, Ghana, to go over its options. That meeting was canceled for “technical reasons.” Mass demonstrations in key ECOWAS countries—such as Nigeria and Senegal—against an ECOWAS military invasion of Niger have confounded their own politicians to support an intervention. It would be naïve to suggest that no intervention is possible. Events are moving very fast, and there is no reason to suspect that ECOWAS will not intervene before August ends.

Coups in the Sahel
When ECOWAS suggested the possibility of an intervention into Niger, the military governments in Burkina Faso and Mali said that this would be a “declaration of war” not only against Niger but also against their countries. On August 2, one of the key leaders of the Niger coup, General Salifou Mody traveled to Bamako (Mali) and Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso) to discuss the situation in the region and to coordinate their response to the possibility of an ECOWAS—or Western—military intervention into Niger. Ten days later, General Moussa Salaou Barmou went to Conakry (Guinea) to seek that country’s support for Niger from the leader of the military government in that country, Mamadi Doumbouya. Suggestions have already been floated for Niger—one of the most important countries in the Sahel—to form part of the conversation of a federation that will include Burkina Faso, Guinea, and Mali. This would be a federation of countries that have had coups to overthrow what have been seen to be pro-Western governments that have not met the expectations of increasingly impoverished populations.

The story of the coup in Niger becomes partly the story of what the communist journalist Ruth First called “the contagion of the coup” in her remarkable book, The Barrel of the Gun: Political Power in Africa and the Coup d’états (1970). Over the course of the past thirty years, politics in the Sahel countries has seriously desiccated. Parties with a history in the national liberation movements, even the socialist movements (such as Bazoum’s party) have collapsed into being representatives of their elites, who are conduits of a Western agenda. The French-US-NATO war in Libya in 2011 allowed jihadis groups to pour out of Libya and flock into southern Algeria and into the Sahel (almost half of Mali is held by al-Qaeda-linked formations). The entry of these forces gave the local elites and the West the justification to further tighten limited trade union freedoms and to excise the left from the ranks of the established political parties. It is not as if the leaders of the mainline political parties are right-wing or center-right, but that whatever their orientation, they have no real independence from the will of Paris and Washington. They became—to use a word on the ground—“stooges” of the West.

Absent any reliable political instruments, the discarded rural and petty-bourgeois sections of the country turn to their children in the armed forces for leadership. People like Burkina Faso’s Captain Ibrahim Traoré (born 1988), who was raised in the rural province of Mouhoun, and Colonel Assimi Goïta (born 1988), who comes from the cattle market town and military redoubt of Kati, represent these broad class fractions perfectly. Their communities have been utterly left out of the hard austerity programs of the International Monetary Fund, of the theft of their resources by Western multinationals, and of the payments for Western military garrisons in the country. Discarded populations with no real political platform to speak for them, these communities have rallied behind their young men in the military. These are “Colonel’s Coups”—coups of ordinary people who have no other options—not “General’s Coups”—coups of the elites to stem the political advancement of the people. That is why the coup in Niger is being defended in mass rallies from Niamey to the small, remote towns that border Libya. When I traveled to these regions before the pandemic, it was clear that the anti-French sentiment found no channel of expression other than hope for a military coup that would bring in leaders such as Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso, who had been assassinated in 1987. Captain Traoré, in fact, sports a red beret like Sankara, speaks with Sankara’s left-wing frankness, and even mimics Sankara’s diction. It would be a mistake to see these men as from the left since they are moved by anger at the failure of the elites and of Western policy. They do not come to power with a well-worked out agenda built from left political traditions.

The Niger military leaders have formed a twenty-one-person cabinet headed by Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine, a civilian who had been a finance minister in a previous government and worked at the African Development Bank in Chad. Military leaders are prominent in the cabinet. Whether the appointment of this civilian-led cabinet will divide the ranks of ECOWAS is to be seen. Certainly, Western imperialist forces—notably the United States with troops on the ground in Niger—would not like to see this torque of coups remain in place. Europe—through French leadership—had shifted the borders of their continent from north of the Mediterranean Sea to south of the Sahara Desert, suborning the Sahel states into a project known as G-5 Sahel. Now with anti-French governments in three of these states (Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger) and with the possibility of trouble in the two remaining states (Chad and Mauritania), Europe will have to retreat to its coastline. Sanctions to deplete the mass support of the new governments will increase, and the possibility of military intervention will hang over the region like a famished vulture.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/15/ ... ical-coup/

Sudan’s warring parties continue bombardment as thousands of corpses rot on the streets and over 20 million face hunger

Thousands have been killed and over four million displaced by the war between Sudan’s military and paramilitary that is set to enter its fifth month with no signs of respite. Only 18 of the country’s 89 main hospitals are functioning, that too only at partial capacity

August 14, 2023 by Pavan Kulkarni

Image
A scene from Khartoum on April 15, the first day of fighting in Sudan.

The fighting between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) shows no signs of abating as the war is about to enter its fifth month on August 15, leaving thousands dead, over four million displaced, and more than 20 million hungry.

War planes and artillery continued to bombard Sudan’s capital region on Saturday, August 12, even as thousands of dead bodies are reportedly rotting on its streets, posing the additional risk of disease outbreaks when the healthcare system is teetering on the verge of total collapse. Corpses in mortuaries have also begun to decompose in the heat due to lack of refrigeration amid prolonged power outages.

“A horrifying combination of rising numbers of corpses, severe water shortages, non-functioning hygiene and sanitation services, and lack of water treatment options are also prompting fears of a cholera outbreak in the city,” Save the Children warned in a statement on Tuesday, August 8.

The activists of the local Resistance Committees (RCs), who had been leading the pro-democracy protests against the military junta before the war started on April 15, have been digging graves to bury the corpses in Omdurman, a sister city of capital Khartoum.

Sudan is in no position to handle a disease outbreak with only 18 of its 89 main hospitals functioning, at only partial capacity. The remaining 71 are out of service, either due shortages or due to at least 53 direct attacks on the healthcare facilities, killing and wounding over two dozen medics.

“In these conditions, dialysis patients are dying one after the other, many women are losing their lives giving birth at home without any recourse, and even malaria— so easy to treat orally—is becoming severe because of the shortages,” said Sylvain Perron, program manager of Doctors Without Borders who has been working in Khartoum. “Add to this the existence of massive sexual violence committed on a daily basis.”

He also raised concern about children succumbing to diseases. “Between 15 May and 17 July, over 300 deaths, mainly among children under 5 years, were reported due to measles and malnutrition,” according to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR).

The UN World Food Programme (WFP) said on Friday, August 11, that 20.3 million people, amounting to about 42% of the country’s population, are suffering from “severe acute hunger.” 6.3 million of them, amounting to 13% of the population, are “just one step from famine, with the conflict continuing to disrupt access to humanitarian aid and forcing millions to flee their homes,” said the UN.

The most food insecure state in Sudan is West Darfur, where entire villages have been burnt down by the RSF and its allied militias, leaving behind patches of scorched earth visible all over the satellite image of the residential areas of Sirba, captured by Planet Labs PBC on July 29. At least 460 were reportedly killed and thousands wounded in this town over the span of a few days late last month.

Sudan

These militias were organized under the regime of former dictator Omar al-Bashir during the Darfur civil war in the 2000s by recruiting Arab-speaking nomadic herders to help the SAF crush the rebel groups of the sedentary farming communities speaking local African languages.

While many of these militias, accused of mass atrocities, were later coalesced to form the RSF in 2013, those militias left out of the paramilitary were not disarmed and disbanded. With the support of the RSF, they have continued attacks, displacing millions in West Darfur even after the armed rebel groups signed the Juba peace agreement in 2020 in exchange for a share in state power, after Bashir was ousted in April 2019 by the December Revolution.

However, Bashir’s trusted generals who were forced under the pressure of mass demonstrations to remove him — SAF chief Abdel Fattah al Burhan and RSF head Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, a.k.a Hemeti — formed a military junta. Burhan took the helm as its chairman, appointing Hemeti as his deputy.

The short-lived joint civilian-military transitional government that was formed in August 2019, after the right-wing political parties and the junta reached an agreement to share power, was dissolved by Burhan and Hemeti who seized all power in a coup in October 2021.

When the internal power-struggle between Burhan and Hemeti escalated into a full-blown war between the SAF and the RSF, the latter, taking advantage of the anarchy, accelerated what has been called a “depopulation campaign” in the mineral-rich Darfur, whose gold mines it controls. West Darfur in particular has been suffering the worst of the attacks. According to some reports, more than 10,000 have been killed here since the war started between SAF and RSF.

Over 4 million displaced
Over 300,000 have fled from this state to neighboring country, Chad. Including those who have fled to the Central African Republic, Egypt, Ethiopia, and South Sudan, this war has produced at least 884,000 refugees and asylum seekers.

The total displacements have exceeded 4 million, with more than 3 million “internally displaced across [all the] 18 states” by the start of this month, according to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

Over 71% of them fled from the three cities of Khartoum State — capital Khartoum, Khartoum Bahri (North) and Omdurman — where the RSF troops have positioned themselves in residential areas, which the SAF is trying to reclaim by shelling and striking from airplanes.

“Many of those trapped by the fighting have been unable – and in some cases actively prevented – from seeking safety elsewhere. And those that can escape face other dangers: They are vulnerable to abuse, theft and harassment during their journeys to safer areas,” Clementine Nkweta-Salami, Humanitarian Coordinator in Sudan, said on Aug 9.

“A full-fledged civil war will spare neither camels nor cattle”
Cautioning the youth against falling prey to the attempts by both sides to step up recruitment, the Sudanese Communist Party (SCP), which had played a crucial role in the December Revolution, warned of the risk of “a full-fledged civil war that will spare no one.”

Casualties in such a war will not be limited to the capital region, Darfur and other states which had already experienced civil wars, the party warned. “It will not be content with those it has killed, injured, and devastated… It will also destroy the land and wildlife, sparing neither camels nor cattle,” said its statement.

“This is a war that holds no benefit for the people of Sudan.. t is a war between the wealthy elite of the regime… and those who seek to inherit their power, including the new parasites and agents of foreign capital hungry for our resources, lands, and ports.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/14/ ... ce-hunger/

27 dead and over 100 injured in fighting between two militias loyal to Libya’s Tripoli-based government

Fighting broke out on Monday between the powerful 444th brigade and the Rada Force or the Special Deterrence Forces (SDF), both working under Libya’s so-called National Unity Government (GNU) led by Abdul Hameid Dbeibah

August 16, 2023 by Peoples Dispatch

Image
(Photo: Libya Observer).

Fighting between two rival militias in Libya’s capital, Tripoli, went on for the second day on Tuesday, August 15. The fighting has left at least 27 people dead and over 100 others injured, Al-Jazeera reported.

Clashes were reported from different parts of the city along with large-scale destruction. The Libyan Red Crescent claimed it evacuated dozens of families from different locations. The government has shut down Tripoli’s civilian airport.

The gun fighting between the powerful 444th brigade and the Rada Force or the Special Deterrence Forces (SDF), both working under Libya’s so-called National Unity Government (GNU) led by Abdul Hameid Dbeibah, erupted on Monday when the SDF arrested Mohammad Hamza, commander of the 444th brigade, from the Mitiga airport in Tripoli as he was set to board a flight to the eastern Libyan city of Misrata, Libya Observer reported. Hamza was accompanying Prime Minister Dbeibah.

Though the SDF is not part of the GNU’s Interior Ministry, it is affiliated to the Presidential Council backing the Dbeibah government and is also funded by it. The SDF’s commander is Abdel Raouf Kara. The militia claims to be vigilant against criminal activities in the capital.

The United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) issued a formal statement on Tuesday expressing worry about the possible impact of the violence on civilians and the ongoing political process in the country. It called on all parties for “immediate de-escalation” and an end to the ongoing armed clashes.

Ever since the NATO-led invasion in 2011, Libya has been marred with lawlessness, infighting, and war. Following a UN-led peace process, a ceasefire was agreed to by all parties in the country in 2020. However, despite the ceasefire in place, the UN peace process has failed to take root.

There are two rival governments in Libya now backed by different rival political and military establishments and militias trying to take control over the country’s power centers and resources.

The government in Tripoli is backed by militias loyal to the Presidential Council whereas another government in Sirte is backed by the Libyan Parliament and warlord Khalifa Haftar.

Tripoli has faced several rounds of violence in the last few years, mostly between the militias loyal to the GNU but also with forces loyal to the government in Sirte, killing scores of people.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/16/ ... overnment/

******

US SEEKS TO DISPLACE FRANCE IN THE SAHEL
15 Aug 2023 , 2:48 pm .

Image
French soldiers entrenched themselves in their base after the coup (Photo: AFP)

The visit of the interim Undersecretary of State, Victoria Nuland, to Niger could be seen as a betrayal of France. And the reason why this action is seen as a stab in the back is because the European country fears that the United States will tacitly recognize the transitional government led by the military, in exchange for being allowed to keep its bases.

If this comes to fruition, the United States would proactively replace France's security role in the Sahel with a view to preempting Russia, which already has a presence on the African continent with security contracts and strategic investments in several countries.

In the Sahel, anti-French sentiment has been growing. France has been losing influence in the African countries that were once its colonies, which is why nearly 90 senators from that country wrote an open letter to President Emmanuel Macron demanding the end of Françafrique, a term used to denote the relationship of the European country with its former dominions in the region.

The United States calculates that the gradual rejection of the French could result in their total expulsion from the continent and the subsequent security vacuum, which would probably be filled by Russia. The repudiation of the former colonizer appears to be an irreversible process, even when he uses force, either directly or through the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

It is not the first time that France has been betrayed by the United States, since a couple of years ago the European country had an agreement to build 12 submarines for Australia and it decided to finalize the pact with the United States within the framework of the Aukus alliance. The Australian-French contract was valued at 56 billion euros and emerged from talks in 2014.

https://misionverdad.com/eeuu-busca-des ... n-el-sahel

Google Translator

Just as with the Australian sub deal the French are having a hard time accepting their vassalage. They should learn to be good attack dogs like the Brits...<sic>
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 17, 2023 2:51 pm

The situation in the Central African Republic for 11-16 August 2023
August 16, 2023
Rybar

Image

In the Central African Republic, regular attacks by gangs on the positions of government forces and Wagner PMCs continue .

Due to conflicts and organized crime, the tropical forests of the Central African Republic are under threat. Illegal logging and illegal timber trafficking contribute to an annual deforestation of about 1% of the total rainforest area.

clashes
In the south, government forces, together with Wagner PMC fighters and local militia, organized an attack on settlements near the city of Bokolobo . However, the militants repulsed the attack and attempted a counteroffensive, which also failed. Three representatives of the armed forces, four militias and several radicals were killed during the clash.

In the southeast of the Central African Republic, the UPC group continues to attack territories around the cities of Obo and Mboki : at least 11 people were killed, four were injured and five were kidnapped.

A few days later, in downtown Obo, local militia abducted a Muslim man for unknown reasons, resulting in a clash with local law enforcement. No casualties are known, but several shops in the city's Muslim quarter were burned to the ground.

Domestic political situation
August 13 marks the Independence Day of the Central African Republic from France. In honor of this, a traditional military parade was organized in the Kassai camp, where the president was accompanied by fighters from the Wagner PMC.

CAR President Faustin Arcange Touadéra addressed the nation and expressed deep sincere gratitude to all fraternal and friendly countries that support the CAR, separately thanking " the Russian forces for the heavy sacrifices made in the name of protecting human rights, democracy and the sovereignty of the CAR."

Former acting president of the Central African Republic from 2013 to 2016, Ferdinand Alexander Nguende was sentenced to 5 years in prison in absentia on charges of inciting an armed uprising and encroaching on the internal and external security of the state and is required to pay a fine of 5 million CFA francs.

Foreign policy situation
The President of the Central African Republic stated that he has never opposed France and is ready to continue to strengthen interaction with the Fifth Republic, just as with Russia.

President Tuadera also met with Ugandan Minister of Defense Vincent Ssempiya to discuss the repatriation of former militants of the Ugandan nationalist group Lord's Resistance Army , who are currently in custody in the southeast of the CAR.

Interaction with Russia
CAR Defense Minister Rameau-Claude Biraud arrived in Russia for the international military-technical forum "Army-2023" and the 11th Moscow Conference on International Security. The Minister of Defense of the Central African Republic is accompanied by the Russian Defense Attaché in the Central African Republic, Colonel Sergei Sukhonov .

The Patriarchal Exarchate of Africa of the Russian Orthodox Church, on the basis of its community in the city of Boali, organized a summer camp for children, where they get acquainted with the Orthodox faith, go on hikes and excursions, and participate in sports competitions.

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-czentraln ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator

******

Image

[bThe Corporate Make-up of the Mining Industry in South Africa: Profit Survey 2023[/b]
By Andy Higginbottom (Posted Aug 16, 2023)

Introduction
This research paper focuses on corporate profits, gleaned from information in the corporations’ own accounts. We ‘follow the money,’ insofar as company annual reports allow us to do so. The main questions we seek to answer are:

*Who are the main corporate players in South African mining?
*What are the extent and degree of corporate profits?
*Who profits from mining in South Africa?
*What is the London connection?
The principal data source is thirteen company annual reports for 2022, especially their main financial indicators. These have been supplemented by relevant reporting and more analytical literature.

The specific focus of the study also requires a couple of reservations as to scope:

We only give the briefest indication of labour as a resource, and do not include what is clearly significant, that is labour’s perspective. Likewise, the study is limited on both community concerns and the environmental impacts of mining in South Africa, both of which are considerable, especially from the perspective of women.1
Given the nature of data collection from mining company reports, we are following their declared profits. Transfer pricing and the illicit flow of profits from legal operations have both rightly been flagged as ongoing concerns, but here we seek to map only what is reported in open sight, the licit flow of profits.2 These undisguised profit flows are, as will be seen, of concern enough.

Sector Overview
We start with some basic aggregate data about companies mining in South Africa.

The first chart from Labour Research Service (LRS) shows that revenues peaked in the previous commodity cycle in 2013, followed by a trough, then the beginnings of a new uptick in demand that was affected by Covid in 2020, then in the two most recent years 2021 and 2022 making a strong recovery in revenues received, indeed to record levels.

Figure 1: Average Revenues in South Africa Mining Sector 2007–2022

Image
Source: LRS 2023a (Statistics South Africa, “PGM Sales Surge Due to Higher Prices,” 2021 at statssa.gov.za)

The greater revenues are mostly due to higher prices, rather than significant changes in volumes of production. Therefore, the effect of greater sales revenue is accentuated in the more volatile movement of profits, as in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Average Profits Before Tax in South Africa Mining Sector 2007–2022

Image
Source: LRS 2023a

Note also the great sensitivity of profits to changes in revenue, with a sharp fall in 2012 from the previous peak, and then losses in 2015 and 2016 in the trough of the cycle. Mining corporations plan for these cyclical changes in profitability, and typically they will set profit targets accordingly, such as a cycle average of 15% rate of profit (Return of Capital Employed).

The trough years occasion major movements, as corporations reorganise their asset portfolios and seek out the strategically most profitable market sectors and projects going forward. Mining projects are typically planned over a 30-year time span.

It is important to note from the outset the significance of international currency movements for the relations between revenues and costs. Insofar as the South Africa Rand depreciates against the US dollar, it is generally to the advantage of producers that export minerals. This is because most of their costs are in South African Rand (ZAR), whereas their sales prices are usually in US dollars. So as the dollar appreciates, any given dollar price converts into more Rand, thus increasing the margin against cost base mostly in Rands. This effect is demonstrated in the following example.

In 2021 the mining sector’s total profit before tax was US $72,010 million that converts to 1,081,303 million ZAR at an annual average exchange rate of 15.02 ZAR to the US $. The US dollar appreciated against the Rand in the following year, the Rand depreciated against the dollar so that the conversion was 16.58 in 2022. In 2022 profits before tax were US $79,483 million that convert to 1,317,920 million ZAR.3 The year-on-year increase in profits in dollar terms was 10.4%, whereas in ZAR it was even greater at 21.9%.

Another point is that in the survey we look at profit before tax, as the point of comparison that is widely used as the indicator of the profitability generated by corporate activities. However, the profit income available for the companies to disburse or retain is of course net profit after tax. LRS reports that in 2022 this was 914,817 million ZAR for the South African mining sector.4 Drawing on these figures the effective corporate income tax rate on these thirteen mining companies’ profits in 2022 was 30.6%.5

Prior to 1994 mining was a bastion of what was then called ‘white monopoly capital,’ although it may have been more accurately designated imperialist capital. Since 1994 ANC governments have legislated for Black Economic Empowerment (BEE). The Chamber of Mines, which represents corporate mining, lobbied hard against any extension of BEE provisions.6 BEE originally stipulated 26% share ownership by historically disadvantaged groups, that was increased to 30% shares in companies formed in 2019 and thereafter.7 In practice, workers and communities only benefit marginally from these arrangements, that have in reality acted as a form of legalised corruption recruiting a layer of enriched new bourgeoisie, who act as allies for the existing corporate power, as exemplified by Cyril Ramaphosa ’s meteoric rise to become a multi-millionaire who urged state action against striking miners that led to their massacre in Marikana on 16 August 2012.8

Moeletse Mbeki has called out the BEE pay offs as ‘legalised corruption,’ they are neocolonial arrangements embedded within corporate governance.9

As far as the operating environment provided by the state is concerned, mining operations, especially the smelters, require colossal quantities of electricity, and the bulk materials (coal, metal ores) require significant transport infrastructure. The Economist Intelligence Unit is the mouthpiece of their concerns, “Disruptions took their toll. The woes of transport and energy parastatals—Transnet and Eskom—imposed on mining operations severe rail and port constraints, load-shedding and electricity shortages.”10 But this pro-business framing of the problem does not take into account the acute financial stresses put on state corporations by the World Bank neoliberal ‘electricity for profit’ paradigm, obliging them to serve the interests of private capital rather than the general public.11

The size and nature of the mining workforce is another important consideration. The sector employs half a million workers. The three biggest employers are: platinum group metals (39%); coal (21%) and gold (20%). With the other sectors (iron ore, chrome ore, manganese, diamonds and others) the total is reported as 514,859 employees in 2019 and 475,561 in 2021.12 An increasing proportion, about one third, of the mining workforce are not direct employees, but either employed by sub-contractors, labour brokers, or capital employees “working on projects that fall outside the daily scope of business.”13

Initial Breakdown by Companies
One entry point is to take a look at the Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC) table surveying the market capitalisation of the Top Ten mining companies with stocks traded on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) as of 30 June 2022. Market capitalisation is the overall capital valuation of the company, derived by simply multiplying the trading share price by the number of shares. This method is a strong indicator of the company’s current and expected future profits, in effect the capitalisation of expected returns to shareholders.

Table 1: Market Capitalisation of the Top Ten Mining Companies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)14
(Table at link.)

It is clear from Table 1 that Anglo American is the leading player, with its two subsidiaries comprising 42% of the mining capital traded on the JSE.

This summary is an incomplete overview however, as it includes only a subset of the corporations actively mining. Because the criterion for selection is a primary listing on the JSE, PwC’s data misses several international companies with South African operations.16 To get a fuller picture requires surveying the activities of the super-majors BHP, Glencore and Rio Tinto, plus any subsidiaries of the Anglo American group not traded on the JSE, and any other international corporations active in South Africa.

The Super-Majors Current Presence in South Africa
The LRS reported in 2018 that the three super-majors Glencore Xstrata, BHP Billiton and Anglo American dominated South African mining revenues received from 2013 to 2017.17

In the subsequent five years to date there has however been a significant shift, with Glencore and BHP Billiton reducing their positions in South African production considerably, although both companies retained assets outside South Africa obtained from their acquisitions of Xstrata and Billiton respectively.

The result was to leave Anglo American as the last super-major taking outstanding profits from mining in South Africa.

Anglo American

Anglo American was by some distance the biggest mining group operating in South Africa in 2022. The company traces its roots back to the notorious imperialist Cecil Rhodes who founded the DeBeers diamond conglomerate in 1887, and the Oppenheimer family’s Witwatersrand gold interests, which came together in 1925. For over a century Anglo has been the single greatest beneficiary of the super-exploitation of African workers, in the migrant labour system first constructed by British colonialism, and then further segregated under apartheid.18

Within five years of majority rule in South Africa (1994), the corporation moved its headquarters to London in 1999, close by Buckingham Palace, and since 2021 it is now ensconced in the original DeBeers London office in Charterhouse.19 This corporate machine of colossal wealth extraction is truly Rhodes’ legacy.

Image
Anglo American’s global HQ in the old De Beers building in Charterhouse Street, London (author photo).

Anglo made huge profits in 2022, largely due to the success of its operations in Southern Africa. Gross profits (Earnings Before Interest Tax Depreciation and Amortisation – EBITDA) of $14.5bn. This was down from a record breaking $20.6bn in 2021, yet still the ‘second highest ever achieved.’

There are various indicators of corporate profitability. The profit indicator used here is the corporation’s Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT), that is the net operating profit with deductions for depreciation and amortisation. By this standard measure Anglo reaped $11.96bn profits in 2022. A further deduction for non-controlling interests’ share leaves Anglo’s attributable profit before tax of $9.7bn. Against its attributable capital employed of $32.0bn, this renders the corporation’s underlying rate of profit (Return on Capital Employed – ROCE) of 30% for 2022. Very high, albeit down from its own record 43% in 2021.20

Anglo American’s South African operations generate the major part of the group’s profits. The underlying EBIT profit in 2022 from Anglo’s South Africa platinum group mines were $4.05bn; it profited $1.90bn from its 69.7% owned subsidiary Kumba iron ore; $0.31bn from manganese mines and $0.32bn from De Beers diamonds. That is a $6.58bn combined, i.e., 55% of Anglo’s total profits of $11.96bn came from production in South Africa. With another $0.79bn profit from De Beers in neighbouring Botswana and Namibia, Anglo’s Southern Africa mines combined contribute 58% of its total profits. Australian coal mines provided nearly 24% and Latin American copper and iron mines provided just under 19% of group profits in 2022.21

During the apartheid years Anglo American used its South African base and London connection to extend its operations into Africa. Kwame Nkrumah, the first President of Ghana, complained bitterly against the corporation’s role in thwarting his efforts to effect real independence after the formal end of British colonial rule in 1960. Such was the extent of Anglo and other international mining companies’ economic power, that Nkrumah pointed out their interests effectively constrained his government’s scope for sovereign rule on behalf of the people. Nkrumah called this relation of disguised dominance, neo-colonialism.22

The pattern Anglo set in Ghana proliferated, and was replicated globally and managed through an inner circle of holding companies. Charter Consolidated based in London, oversaw Anglo’s investments in Africa, Australia and elsewhere. In the 1970s Anglo set up MINORCO as a Bermuda tax haven to funnel out its profits from copper mining in Zambia. MINORCO became a second international holding company, channelling Anglo’s investments into the Americas, and of course the reflux flow of profits.23

Now all of Anglo’s assets are controlled out of London, and it maintains a considerable presence in mining production in Africa 24 and Latin America.25

The following table summarises data provided by Anglo that relate its 2022 profits with the number of employees by region (Table 2). Several caveats are required in considering these figures. For example, that remunerations to management as well as to workers are included. The contribution of sub-contracted workers as part of the workforce as well as employees is not evident. Perhaps the biggest caution concerns the treatment of harms due to the mining operations damaging the environment and societies around them. The profit figures given do not yet include the deductions of corporate income tax; but these taxes do not cover the profound ‘external costs’ involved, some of which by their character are unquantifiable.

Nonetheless, the figures do indicate the general pattern which is that employees in the producing areas generate, on average, about four times more profits per head than their remuneration.26 The source of these super-profits is the tremendous yields of the mineral resources that employees mine at significant volumes, a combination of labour and nature that are the basis of the huge revenues. The Australian mines combine both high yielding resource and high degrees of mechanisation, allowing the corporation to reap even higher profits per employee even when they are better paid. This points to the most profitable combination of all, production at volume of a mineral in demand with low unit costs. The lowest cost combination is: exploitation of a high yielding resource, with high degree of mechanisation, limited ‘external costs’ and, by international standards, low wages. It is just this combination that the corporation plans for Quellaveco, its new copper mine in Peru.27

((Much, much more at link.)

https://mronline.org/2023/08/16/the-cor ... rvey-2023/

The lesson my friends is majority rule, just like the Civil Rights Act in the US , is only a facade. Without control of the means of production we are still under the heel of the owning class.

******

MI6 to Send Ukraine-Nazi Gladio Death Squads on Terrorist Missions to Africa
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 16, 2023

Image

“The task of the Ukrainian squad, formed by the British special services, will be to carry out sabotage attacks at infrastructure facilities in Africa and to assassinate African leaders eyeing cooperation with Russia,” the source said

UK intelligence service MI-6 has prepared a sabotage squad comprising 100 militants from Ukrainian nationalist groups for operations on the African soil, a military-diplomatic source has told TASS.

“According to information, confirmed by several sources, UK special service MI-6 has formed and prepared for deployment on the southern continent a sabotage and assassination squad, comprising members of Ukrainian nationalist and neo-Nazi groups, in an attempt to prevent cooperation between African countries and Russia,” the source said.

According to the source, the Kiev government tasked the country’s national security service SBU, military intelligence service GUR and the Defense Ministry in July with helping MI-6 and SAS to select 100 militants from Ukrainian nationalist groups with vast combat experience “on the eastern front.” The instructions were given on a request from London.

“The task of the Ukrainian squad, formed by the British special services, will be to carry out sabotage attacks at infrastructure facilities in Africa and to assassinate African leaders eyeing cooperation with Russia,” the source said.

“Lt. Col. of GUR [Main Directorate of Intelligence] of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry V. Prashchuk was appointed to be the commander of the Ukrainian squad of cutthroats,” the source added.


Vitaly Prashchuk was born in Ukraine’s Vinnitsa Region in 1980. He participated in hostilities in the Donetsk and Lugansk Region in 2014-2016 as a commander of a sabotage and reconnaissance squad.

In 2015, Prashchuk was enlisted to the 73rd Center of Maritime Operations and was a service member of the Ukrainian Defense Ministry’s Main Directorate of Intelligence until 2017. He participated in joint operations of GUR and the UK intelligence in Zimbabwe.

Prashchuk retired from active duty in 2019. Later, he was elected a member of Ukraine’s parliament, Verkhovna Rada. When the Russian special operation in Ukraine began, he was a reserve officer of GUR.

TASS

MI6 Prepared Ukrainian Sabotage Unit to Be Sent to Africa
The United Kingdom’s Secret Intelligence Service, commonly known as MI6, has prepared a sabotage unit of 100 Ukrainian fighters to be sent to Africa to counter Russia-Africa cooperation, a military-diplomatic source has said.

The source added that Kiev, at the request of London in July 2023, ordered that Ukraine’s Security Service and the Main Directorate of Intelligence of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (GUR) “provide maximum and prompt assistance to representatives of the British intelligence MI6 and SAS special unit in the selection of 100 fighters from the Ukrainian national formations with significant combat experience on the ‘eastern front.'”

One of the main tasks of the unit in Africa will be “sabotage of infrastructure in African countries, as well as the elimination of African leaders oriented towards cooperation with Russia,” the source added.

The unit is planned to be sent to Africa by “a chartered civilian ship from the [Ukrainian] port of Izmail to the [Sudanese] city of Omdurman during the second half of August,” the source said.

GUR officer Lt. Col. Vitaliy Prashchuk, who has experience of “successful liquidations” and participated in MI6 operations in Zimbabwe, will head the unit, the source said.


A native of the Vinnytsia Region, Prashchuk participated in combat operations in the Donetsk and Lugansk Regions in 2014-2016, as the commander of a sabotage and reconnaissance group, which had several “successful liquidations” under its belt. In 2015, he joined the 73rd Ukrainian Marine Special Operations Center and served in intelligence until 2017. He participated in joint special operations run by Ukrainian and British intelligence services in Zimbabwe.

After his discharge in 2019, he was elected to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (Ukrainian parliament) from Volodymyr Zelensky’s “Servant of the People” party. At the beginning of the Russian special military operation, he was a reserve intelligence officer.

Last November, the Grayzone, an independent news site, citing documents and pieces of correspondence, reported that British spies had inked an agreement with the Security Service of Ukraine to train a Ukrainian “guerrilla terrorist army” to organize acts of sabotage in Crimea.

The same individuals who advocated building an army of “guerrillas” were responsible for hatching plans for an attack on the Crimean bridge: NATO Secretary General’s Advisor Chris Donnelly, British Foreign Intelligence Service (MI6) officer Guy Spindler, and former Lithuanian Defense Minister Audrius Butkevicius.

Initially, the Ukrainians were supposed to be instructed at the Yavorov training area in the Lvov region of western Ukraine. Then, a decision was made that the fighters would be trained in Greece and Poland.
British special forces have been involved in secret operations in at least 19 countries since 2011, including Russia and Ukraine, a study in May conducted by Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), a London-based non-profit organization, revealed.

In Ukraine, British agents conducted reconnaissance and trained fighters of the Armed Forces of Ukraine together with US spy agencies, the authors of the document revealed. This data on the British special forces’ clandestine missions raises questions about the transparency and legal basis of their activities, the organization noted.

According to the AOAV, the list of countries where British special forces were secretly deployed to includes Estonia, Iran, Libya, Pakistan, Russia, and Ukraine. In addition, British special forces have trained in Oman, Turkiye and Saudi Arabia. The full list of countries where their activities have been carried out is likely to be much broader, the non-profit added.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... to-africa/

hy is Niger’s Military Leaders so Popular—and so Feared?
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 16, 2023
Owen Schalk

Image
Supporters of the coup with a picture of General Abdourahamane Tchiani in Niamey, Niger. Photo by Sam Mednick.

The coup speaks to the disadvantaged and impoverished victims of neocolonialism


Events in Niger have been moving fast. After overthrowing President Mohamed Bazoum on July 26, the military government of Abdourahamane Tchiani established itself as an independent and anti-Western force in the region, joining the ranks of Guinea, Mali, and Burkina Faso. French President Emmanuel Macron was reportedly “furious” over a perceived failure to predict Bazoum’s ouster. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), led by Nigeria, immediately took a hardline against the Tchiani government, threatening a military invasion to restore Bazoum by August 6. Mali and Burkina Faso declared that they would defend Niger from any such invasion.

Amidst popular demonstrations in support of the coup and against foreign intervention, Tchiani’s government closed Nigerien airspace to stave off interference from ECOWAS or France. The August 6 deadline passed without incident, in part because the Nigerian Senate rejected President Bola Tinubu’s plan to deploy soldiers to Niger, and the region evaded open war. That same day, approximately 30,000 supporters gathered in a stadium in Niamey to express their enthusiasm for the military takeover.

On August 7, US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland visited Niger to pressure military leaders to restore Bazoum, who had been the US and France’s man in West Africa since early 2021. Nuland expressed “grave concern” about the coup and emphasized “the economic and other kinds of support that we will legally have to cut off if democracy is not restored.” Again, Niger’s new rulers didn’t cave.

Amidst sanctions and further threats from ECOWAS and the West, the junta revealed a new cabinet on August 10, led by Prime Minister Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine. The cabinet includes many civilian members, including Zeine. According to analyst Beverly Ochieng:

[This is] very unlike what happened in Mali and Burkina Faso, where the military took most of the posts in the interim cabinet. It’s one way of showing a bit of goodwill and demonstrating that they are willing to work with civilians and that they do want a transitional government, but it’s also another way of saying ‘when you come to negotiate with us it’ll be on the terms of a transition, not on the terms of restoring the [Bazoum] government’… There are very few odds of Bazoum being reinstated or… being seen legitimately.

Amidst a diplomatic impasse, a delegation of Islamic scholars from Nigeria held talks with the Tchiani government on August 13. In the meeting, Tchiani said that Nigeria and Niger “[are] not only neighbours but brothers and sisters who should resolve issues amicably.” He added, “the coup was well intended,” meant to “stave off an imminent threat” to the region. He also revealed that Nigeria’s threat of invasion to restore Bazoum was “painful,” and he regretted that his neighbours seemed uninterested in “their side of the matter.”

Invasion threats and the consolidation of power

On the day of the scholarly delegation, the Tchiani government announced that Bazoum would be prosecuted for “high treason and undermining internal and external security.” Washington and ECOWAS condemned the decision. ECOWAS announced that it would meet on August 17 and 18 to once again discuss a military intervention against the Nigerien government.

The renewal of invasion talks is worrisome, but an actual intervention seems unlikely. If ECOWAS and its backers were unwilling to roll across Nigerien borders in the heady days immediately after the coup—when public support was uncertain and the military’s stability unknown—why would they risk it now, when public support is obvious and the authority of Tchiani and the interim government has solidified?

Bizarrely, ECOWAS and its Western backers seem unaware that their hardline anti-coup position is only helping Niger’s military leaders consolidate their power. The coup is popular, backed by 78 percent of respondents according to the first poll taken after the junta’s seizure of power. Reuters reporters found that “residents of Niamey… were strongly supportive of the coup and said joining forces with Mali and Burkina Faso would strengthen all three countries in the fight against Islamist insurgents.” The threat of foreign invasion will only rally more supporters to the junta’s cause.

Invasion threats are also helping Russia increase its soft power in the region, something Western governments are ostensibly highly concerned about. In contrast to bullish statements from the US, Europe, and ECOWAS, the Kremlin stressed “the importance of settling the situation in the Republic of Niger solely through peaceful political and diplomatic means.” After a meeting between Malian leader Assimi Goïta and Vladimir Putin, Goïta posted on X (Twitter) that the Russian president emphasized “the importance of a peaceful resolution of the situation for a more stable Sahel.”

J’ai eu un entretien téléphonique avec le Président Poutine. Nous avons évoqué la situation du Niger. Il a souligné l’importance d’un règlement pacifique de la situation pour un sahel plus stable. pic.twitter.com/po6U2meRw1

— Colonel Assimi GOITA (@GoitaAssimi) August 15, 2023


Yet the invasion talks are continuing. They will only strengthen the Nigerien military’s grip on power. As an example, the Zelensky government was deeply unpopular when Russia invaded Ukraine, but Ukrainians have fought courageously, suffering enormous casualties. Wouldn’t it stand to reason that Nigeriens would do the same, especially when their government is actually supported by a large majority of the population and backed by regional players like Mali and Burkina Faso?

Moreover, wouldn’t it be worth interrogating why an anti-Western, pro-Russian military government, one that took power outside the framework of elections, is so popular? Aren’t Western governments curious why the rhetoric of Tchiani, or Mali’s Goïta, or Burkina Faso’s Ibrahim Traoré, resonates with so many people in the region? Don’t they know that NATO’s destruction of Libya fueled the jihadist insurgencies in these countries? Don’t countries like the US, France, and Canada feel some responsibility for provoking anti-Western sentiments given their history of colonialism and political meddling, their huge military presence in the region, their backing of widely disliked governments, and the fact that they expropriate billions in resources like gold and uranium while ordinary Nigeriens, Malians, and Burkinabè suffer in abject poverty? The answer is: evidently not.

Regional splits and the anti-imperialist turn

The hostilities between Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso on one side, and ECOWAS and the West on the other, have been brewing for several years. While Mali and Burkina Faso were rooting out European and US influence following their coups, Niger opened its arms to soldiers from the US and Europe, including France and Germany. And while Niger embraced Western troops, Mali made the decision to leave the European-funded G5 Sahel organization.

The G5 Sahel was formed to coordinate an anti-jihadist military force between Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, Mauritania, and Chad. It was largely a Western project, set up with European Union money and backed by France. But as some West African countries became more independent, the organization started fraying at the seams.

After the Malian military took power in 2021, France allegedly interfered in the G5 Sahel to prevent Chad from passing the organization’s presidency to Bamako. Even if France was not involved in the freezing-out of Mali, that was how Mali’s leaders interpreted the event, and researcher Boubacar Haidara agreed. “It would be hard not to see the French hand behind this refusal to transfer the presidency,” he said.

These internal divisions, and the alleged French hand in stoking them, contributed to the decline of the G5 Sahel. In May 2022, even the Western-backed Bazoum declared “The G5 is dead.”

France’s Operation Barkhane (2014-2022) withdrew from the region amidst anti-French revolt. The European Union’s Takuba Task Force (2020-2022) suffered a similar fate. The G5 Sahel (set up in 2014) is essentially dead. And what have these Western-backed initiatives wrought? More danger, more insecurity. Malick Doucouré explains:

Before leaving Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso’s capital, I had known it to be an incredibly safe city. Jihadist terrorism was not a concern on anybody’s mind, and this was true across all sections and classes of Burkinabé society. But with the instability following the fall of [former dictator Blaise] Compaoré, militants from Boko Haram, Jama’at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin, Ansar Dine, Ansar ul Islam, and the Islamic State in the Greater Sahara, launched attacks on the capital as well as seemingly indiscriminate slaughters of unarmed rural civilians. The conflict, since 2015, has claimed over 10,000 lives, displaced 1.4 million people, and sent shockwaves throughout the country with shootings and car bombings on Hotels and Cafés. A bus carrying school children was blown up after hitting an explosive device. Foreign embassies and restaurants have also been targeted. Outside of the cities, hundreds of men, women, and children have been killed on raids targeting local markets and rural villages.

The security situation has well and truly deteriorated to a disastrous level. Poverty breeds extremism, so the intensive regime of neocolonial superexploitation maintained for decades by France certainly deserves its fair share of the blame. However, poor leadership has also exacerbated an already critical situation. In November 2021, a mass jihadist assault on a security outpost claimed the lives of 49 soldiers near the northern town of Inata. The soldiers were reportedly underpaid and undersupplied by the [elected Roch Marc Christian] Kaboré government; resentment and unpopularity among the civilian population in West Africa is one thing – but in a region with over 20 attempted coup d’états since 2010, there’s nothing riskier than allowing resentment and unpopularity to build up among the military. Kaboré was removed from power by Lieutenant Colonel Damiba just two months later, in January 2022.


Damiba failed to stem the worsening security and economic conditions; thus, he was overthrown himself in a September 2022 coup led by the 35-year-old captain Ibrahim Traoré. Refusing Western military aid, Traoré ordered a general mobilization to reclaim the 40 percent of national territory that remains in insurgent hands. He also appointed as prime minister Apollinaire Joachim Kyélem de Tambèla, a Marxist and pan-Africanist who supported Thomas Sankara’s efforts to build socialism in the 1980s. Tambèla still espouses Sankara’s vision for his country, having declared “Burkina Faso cannot be developed outside the path set by Thomas Sankara.”

Traoré has pushed forward an anti-imperialist agenda that has proven to be “especially popular with the masses, among whom anti-imperialist sentiments towards their former colonial power had long existed.” After all, Doucouré writes, “France had kept the nation in poverty and assassinated [Thomas] Sankara, seen by many in Burkina as the ‘father of the nation.’”

Anyone with a grasp of the region’s history can understand why anti-imperialist views are so widespread in West African counties. It is easy to understand why governments that speak the language of anti-imperialism garner so much public support. And it is plain to see that the West African military leaders, whether or not they are genuine in their anti-imperialist assertions, are quite popular.

Image
Supporters of the M62 movement in Niger participate in a demonstration to demand the departure of foreign forces from the country.

The role of popular movements in Niger

In Niger, a number of popular movements have expressed support for the coup, foremost among them the M62 Movement led by Abdoulaye Seydou. M62 not only opposes the French military presence and French neocolonialism, but also the grim socioeconomic situation imposed on Niger. And the situation is grimmer than most readers can likely imagine. After decades of neocolonialism, over 40 percent of Nigeriens live on less than $1.90 a day, in a country from which French and Canadian companies extract billions in profit every year.

M62’s office in Niamey is named for Thomas Sankara, the legendary revolutionary leader of Burkina Faso during the socialist period of 1983-1987. Seydou describes Sankara as his “idol.”

When the Irish Times visited Niamey to interview Seydou, they reported that M62’s office sports photographs of Sankara, Frantz Fanon, and Nelson Mandela. The Fanon picture includes the quote, “Each generation must, out of relative obscurity, discover its mission, fulfil it, or betray it.” Mandela is also quoted: “Freedom can never be taken for granted. Each generation must safeguard it and extend it.”

Seydou’s interview with the Irish Times offers key insights into the struggles and opinions of ordinary Nigeriens, who have largely come out in support of the July 26 coup:

Seydou repeatedly accused the French military of trying “to instigate some turmoil in the country”, and also trying to “create conflict” with Mali, a country which was a “brother for a long time”.

M62, he said, was also protesting over the cost of living. “Now they increased everything… life has become very, very, very expensive. They increased the fuel prices and then they increased all products like oil, vegetables, rice… So we are fighting against this so that the government should reduce the prices.”

He accused the Nigerien government of raising prices to get more taxes, but not spending them on “education, health and other fields that can permit the country to move forward”.

And the French, he said, were partly to blame. “It’s like the [French forces] become protection for the government so the government can do exploiting, do whatever they want… Even now there is no peace in the country because there is no security.”

He also referred to the death of several people in Tera, western Niger, in late 2021, which took place when protesters confronted a French convoy on its way to Mali. “Nothing happened [as a result], it’s like they’re not human beings or citizens of this country,” said Seydou.

Seydou said he was surprised that people were not allowed to protest. “This movement is a peaceful movement,” he said. “The [Bazoum] government is very afraid… Most of the population, the people are supporting us. It’s like a popular movement.”


Under Mohamed Bazoum, whom the West frequently described as the lone democratic holdout in the region, M62’s ability to protest was severely restricted. In fact, one day after his interview with the Irish Times, Seydou was arrested by Bazoum’s government. The initial charge against him was “publication of information likely to undermine public order.” That charge was dropped, but as he was leaving court, he was arrested again and “charged with being complicit in burning miners’ sheds on a gold site in Niger’s Say area.”

Seydou was transferred to a high-security prison, where he remained until the military government of Tchiani freed him on August 15, a decision welcomed by M62. The organization’s secretary general Sanoussi Mahaman responded to Seydou’s release with the following statement: “The Niamey Court of Appeal has cancelled the decision of the High Court… which had sentenced our comrade Abdoulaye Seydou to nine months in prison… We have always said that Abdoulaye Seydou’s detention is an arbitrary decision… orchestrated from start to finish.”

On the day of Seydou’s release from prison, the US spoke out to condemn the junta’s prosecution of Bazoum, the man who had imprisoned him. A US government statement reads: “[The prosecution of Bazoum] is completely unwarranted and unjustified… It is a further affront in our opinion to democracy and justice and to the respect of the rule of law.”

In Mali and Burkina Faso, there are civil society groups like M62 that have organized around the issues of French neocolonialism, Western imperialism, and national poverty: Yerewolo in Mali, for instance, and National Coordination of Civil Society Organizations in Burkina Faso, which includes about 20 organizations. Like M62, these groups support the seemingly anti-imperialist orientation of the military governments in their countries.

The spectre of anti-imperialism

The Niger coup has been receiving far more media attention in the West than the coups in Guinea, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Why? The obvious answer is that Bazoum’s Niger was the final island of Western military influence in the region, and powers like France, the US, and Canada are desperately clinging to the possibility that sanctions and invasion threats can reverse Tchiani’s takeover. But there is also the continental context to consider.

In a recent interview with BreakThrough News, US activist Eugene Puryear said that Africa’s traditional elite is frightened by the prospect of an anti-Western coup. These elites enjoy their status as “interlocutors” between foreign capital and the African labour force. From their privileged positions, they are able to grow fabulously rich off the immiseration of their own people, while their Western-backed militaries and police forces promise to suppress any popular uprising to change the status quo.

The coup in Niger cut through these elites’ false sense of security. Seemingly out of nowhere, Washington’s golden boy in West Africa was overthrown and imprisoned—at the same time, the new leadership in Niger welcomed the backing of a wide range of citizens who have grown tired of the systemic poverty imposed on them while foreign capitalists and the domestic elite grow richer and richer. That was surely enough to rattle other African leaders.

None of this analysis aims to mislead readers about the political character of West Africa’s military leaders. These individuals speak the language of anti-colonialism and anti-imperialism, but they have not announced plans to radically reorient their economies along socialist lines. In one way, this is understandable: when large swaths of one’s national territory are controlled by insurgents, the military question naturally predominates above all else. But in another way, it is bothersome, as the possibility exists that the anti-imperialist turn is mainly rhetoric aimed at mobilizing the support of dissatisfied populations.

Regardless of the political orientation of these coup governments, it is obvious that the West and its allies on the continent are irate. It is also clear that, in Niger’s case especially, the coups are speaking to the disadvantaged and impoverished victims of neocolonialism. The future is unclear, but for now, Washington and its allies are trembling with fury and trepidation.

[youtube]https://youtu.be/gflPjawDR6E[/youtube]

http://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/1 ... so-feared/

******

France Reportedly Thinks US Backstabbed It During Nuland’s Trip to Niger
AUGUST 16, 2023

Image
Sympathizers of the Niger coup hold an anti-France demonstration. Photo: Reuters.

By Andrew Korybko – Aug 15, 2023

French newspaper Le Figaro cited an unnamed diplomatic source over the weekend who alleged that the US backstabbed France during Acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland’s trip to Niger. The piece is paywalled but was summarized here. France reportedly fears that the US might tacitly recognize Niger’s interim military-led government in exchange for being allowed to retain its bases. Should that happen, then the US would proactively replace France’s security role in the Sahel before Russia/Wagner has a chance to.

This concern is predicated on rational calculations. From the US’ strategic perspective, the anti-French sentiment that’s sweeping the Sahel will inevitably result in ousting that country’s military from this part of Africa, which could lead to a security void that would likely be filled by Russia/Wagner. Even if France resorts to force for clinging to its last regional bastion in Niger, whether directly and/or via Nigerian-led ECOWAS, then it’ll only exacerbate the hatred that locals feel for their former colonizer.

A swift victory is doomed to be pyrrhic since another round of anti-French unrest would follow sooner or later to complete the decolonization process that the prior one couldn’t, while the outbreak of a larger regional war risks Russia accelerating its envisaged replacement of France’s security role in the Sahel. Both outcomes are contrary to America’s long-term interests, though some policymakers might find their potential short-term benefits to be alluring.

It’s in this context that Nuland visited the Nigerien capital last week to “push for a negotiated solution” according to what she informed the press during a special briefing after her meetings there. Wagner chief Yevgeny Prigozhin reacted to this development by boasting that “the US has recognized a government that it did not recognize yesterday just to avoid meeting the Wagner PMC (Private Military Company) in the country.” While some might have dismissed his remarks as trolling, they actually convey a stark truth.

Nuland’s trip was likely driven by her government’s desire to determine post-coup Niger’s intended relations with Russia/Wagner. She made contradictory statements about this during her briefing that were analyzed here, but the point is that this was probably the real reason behind her visit. If she assessed that no clear commitment had yet been made to solicit Wagner’s services, then it would be possible to make progress on the vague “negotiated solution” that she claimed to have in mind.

Judging by Le Figaro’s report, France fears that the interim military-led government is willing to explore a deal whereby they’ll agree to keep Russia/Wagner at bay and retain the US bases in their country in exchange for Washington ensuring that ECOWAS doesn’t invade like it threatened to do. In that event, the full fury of the Nigerien people would be directed against France, which could either go it alone in trying to forcibly reverse last month’s coup in vain or chalk up the strategic loss and withdraw.

The US already backstabbed France a few years back by stealing its nuclear submarine deal with Australia via the surprise unveiling of AUKUS so the precedent exists for it to backstab that country again in the Sahel by stealing its “sphere of influence” there through such means. In this particular case, American policymakers might have concluded that France’s military ouster from the region is inevitable so it’s better to proactively replace it with their own forces than risk Russia/Wagner filling the void.

To that end, it makes sense to opportunistically exploit the latest events in pursuit of a pragmatic deal with Niger’s interim military-led government despite being at France’s expense. There’s no guarantee that it’ll succeed, but it’s strategically sound from the perspective of US New Cold War interests in Africa. America could present itself as a peacemaker that averted the wider war that France wanted to spark all while stopping the spread of Russian military-strategic influence on the EU’s Sahelian doorstep.

The reframing of Nuland’s trip in light of Le Figaro’s report compellingly explains France’s alleged fears real intentions of the United States wanting to diplomatically resolve the West African Crisis. The ulterior motive behind its latest “push for a negotiated solution” is to proactively replace France’s security role in the Sahel before Russia/Wagner has a chance to step in. In this way, the US could mitigate the strategic damage from the Nigerien Coup and arguably benefit from it to an extent.

https://orinocotribune.com/france-repor ... -to-niger/

******

BlackRock is a “modern day Dutch East India Company” say activists
US-based organizations gather in front of the BlackRock headquarters in New York City to demand the asset holder cancel USD 220 million of Zambia’s debt

August 15, 2023 by Natalia Marques

Image
Eugene Puryear speaks in front of the BlackRock headquarters in NYC on Monday, August 14 (Photo: Wyatt Souers)
On August 14, US-based organizations rallied in front of the BlackRock world headquarters in New York City to demand that the massive investment company cancel the USD 220 million it holds in Zambia’s external debt. Organizations that participated in the action include the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER) Coalition, the Peoples Forum, the Debt Collective, Nodutdol for Korean Community Development, Friends of the Congo, and Friends of Swazi Freedom.

For years, Zambia has been stuck diverting public funds to service its foreign debts. These debts are themselves a legacy of colonialism, as Thomas Sankara said in a 1987 speech at the Organization for African Unity, “Debt is a cleverly managed reconquest of Africa aimed at subjugating its growth and development through foreign rules.” Meanwhile, most of the Zambian people live in poverty, with high rates of hunger and stunted growth of children.

Nova Felder of the organization Bridging Africa and Black Americans addressed the crowd before marching to the BlackRock headquarters, saying, “BlackRock and other multinational companies are modern day Dutch East India Companies. Its CEO, Larry Fink, is a modern day Christopher Columbus, BlackRock’s very own Christopher Columbus, a colonialist with an eye on the next territory to conquer for its investors and its board.”

“They are also investors in the industrial prison complex, the military industrial complex, energy corporations that stand to “protect” the environment, but also further pollute it,” Felder said, referencing BlackRock’s massive investments in private prisons, weapons companies, and fossil fuels.

Zambia’s debt is held primarily—70%—by Western institutions, although the crisis is often blamed on China by leaders in the West. Early this year, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen claimed that China was a “barrier” to ending the Zambian debt crisis. In a recent interview with BreakThrough News, Zambian Socialist Party president Dr. Fred M’membe criticized this narrative.

“Let’s look at the figures. Today, only 30% of Zambia’s foreign debt is held by China,” he said. “If there’s a debt trap, who holds the 30% and who holds the 70%? Who has trapped Zambia? If there’s a debt trap, really, it’s the USA and Britain that are holding Zambia at ransom in terms of debt.”

“We’re not asking for them to put off interest payments. We’re asking them to completely and totally eliminate all debt from Zambia,” said BreakThrough News journalist Eugene Puryear. “The entire system that led Zambia to even take out debt is immoral and unjust.”

“[Colonizers] constructed a whole system to force Zambians and people from Zimbabwe and South Africa to work in the mines for basically slave wages,” said Puryear. “They forced people out of their villages, off the land, into the mines, to mine the diamonds, to mine the gold. Then they stole the money… and put it in their own banks and built big buildings just like this. Big mansions all around the world. Yachts going from coast to coast. It’s all stolen money. So not only should they forgive the debt just generally because it’s the right thing to do, but quite frankly, it is part and parcel of the reparations that are due for African people for 500 years of colonialism and slavery.”

According to activists, BlackRock has refused to even reduce the interest rate on Zambia’s debts or even delay payments, as the company stands to make enormous profits if the debts are paid in full. As Puryear described, the Socialist Party of Zambia, a strong voice against the Zambian government’s acquiescence to foreign debt holders, is “being brutally attacked again, shot, beaten, having elections rigged, thrown in prison just for saying that the needs of the average Zambian person to eat, to have shelter, to have clothes, to be educated, to have health care is more important than the right of BlackRock to make profit.” Recently, Dr. Fred M’membe was arrested and released shortly afterward.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/15/ ... activists/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Fri Aug 18, 2023 1:35 pm

AUGUST 17, 2023 BY M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
France’s colonial legacy, US’ security concerns intersect in Niger; Russians at the gates look for new hunting grounds

Image
Supporters of the M62 movement in Niger in a demonstration to demand the departure of foreign forces [File photo]

The military coup in Niger is already three weeks old. The putschists are cementing their rule, having gained the upper hand in the shadow play with the Economic Community of West African States [ECOWAS] backed by ex-colonial powers ravaging that desperately poor West African state rich in mineral wealth.

The prospects of Niger’s pro-Western President Mohamed Bazoum being reinstated look dim. He is an ethnic Arab with a small power base in a predominantly African country, hailing from the migrant Ouled Slimane tribe, which has a history of being France’s fifth column in Sahel region.

The ECOWAS lost the initiative once the coup leaders defied its August 6 deadline to release Bazoum and reinstate him on pain of military action.

The coup in Niger has been a humiliating setback for France too, and a terrible drama for President Emmanuel Macron personally as he lost his best supporter in Africa for France’s neo-colonial policies. Macron egged the ECOWAS on to invade Niger and rescue Bazoum. He misread the groundswell behind the coup and gambled that Niger’s military would splinter. His overreaction boomeranged as the coup leaders overnight abrogated the military pacts with France. And the latent animosity toward France surged, forcing Macron to cede the leadership to Washington.

Not only France, but western powers on the whole do not understand that the African people have a highly politicised mindset, thanks to the violent, bitterly fought national liberation movements. Unsurprisingly, Africa has been quick to adapt to the space opening up for them in the multipolar setting to negotiate with the ex-colonial masters.

Last Monday, General Abdourahmane Tchiani who is the titular head of the coup, refused to meet the US Acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. Nuland and other US officials asked to see Bazoum in person, but that request was also turned down. Instead, Nuland had to negotiate with the commander of Niger’s Special Operations Forces and one of the leaders of the coup, Brig. Gen. Moussa Salaou Barmou, who serves as chief of defence.

Interestingly, Barmou had attended the US National Defence University and was trained at Fort Benning in Georgia. Obviously, the junta hoped to engage with Washington. The Intercept has since exposed that Barmou was not the only Nigerien general trained by the US who was involved in the coup.

It said, ‘‘Two weeks after Niger’s coup, the State Department has still not provided a list of the US-connected mutineers, but a different US official confirmed that there are “five people we’ve identified as having received [US military] training.” Conceivably, Washington is keeping its cards close to the chest and is keeping the Russians guessing.

The US faces a messy situation in Niger. Its priorities are two-fold — one, block any Russian move to have Wagner fighters replace the French contingent in Niger, and, two, keep its three bases in Niger come what may. If the Biden administration has not formally labeled the military takeover in Niger a coup, it is because such a designation will not permit further security assistance to Niger where the US has a 1100-strong military presence and, more importantly, a drone base, known as airbase 201, near Agadez in central Niger built at a cost of more than $100 million, which has been used since 2018 for operations in the Sahel.

A Reuters report stated, ‘‘One of the US officials said if Wagner fighters turn up in Niger it would not automatically mean US forces would have to leave.’’ The official said a scenario where a few dozen Wagner forces base themselves in Niger’s capital Niamey is unlikely to affect the US’ military presence, but ‘‘if thousands of Wagner fighters spread across the country, including near Agadez, problems could arise because of safety concerns for US personnel… Regardless, the US will put a high bar for any decision to leave the country.’’

In this bizarre shadow play between Washington and Moscow, the US may not push for a military intervention in Niger by the ECOWAS, lest its military presence in Niger becomes untenable. Of course, the coup leaders in Niamey have also been smart enough not to make any demand so far to remove American troops from Niger.

Against this murky backdrop, the US State Department announcement on Wednesday that new American ambassador to Niger, Kathleen FitzGibbon — formerly number two in the embassy in Nigeria — will arrive in Niamey later this week comes as no surprise. It is a signal of Washington’s confidence about continued engagement with the situation. The State Department deputy spokesperson Vedant Patel told reporters that there are no plans for the new ambassador to present her credentials to coup leaders.

Meanwhile, the African Union’s Peace and Security Council, the organ in charge of enforcing the bloc’s decisions, met in Addis Ababa on Monday and rejected an ECOWAS proposal on military intervention in Niger. Several southern and northern African member countries were “fiercely against any military intervention.’’

Taken together, these developments have put the ECOWAS on the back foot. To compound matters, the coup leaders have since announced their intention to to put Bazoum on trial for ‘‘high treason’’ and undermining state security. Interestingly, the military regime claims to have “gathered the necessary evidence to prosecute before competent national and international authorities the ousted president and his local and foreign accomplices.”

Bazoum is being charged following his post-coup exchanges with high-ranking West African politicians and “their international mentors,” whom the coup leaders accuse of making false allegations and attempting to derail a peaceful transition in order to justify a military intervention.

These developments coupled with growing domestic opposition within Nigeria, which heads the ECOWAS currently, has forced appear to be President Bola Tinubu to shift his stance on military intervention. A powerful Nigerian delegation comprising top Islamic clerics travelled to Niger to open talks with the junta, which promptly agreed to dialogue with the ECOWAS on the way forward in the country. With the passage of time, the ECOWAS is losing the initiative which works to the advantage of the coup leaders.

Basically, while poor governance, rampant corruption, escalating poverty and insecurity have created conditions for the coups in Sahel region, a deeper factor is the geopolitics of resource access and control. Foreign powers are competing to explore and control the abundant mineral resources of West African nations.

The ascendant tensions in Niger and the wider subregion are no doubt exacerbated by the geopolitical and economic rivalry between the East and the West. The spectre that haunts West Africa is that the proxy war between Russia and the US can easily creep into Africa, where Russian mercenaries and Western Special Forces are already stationed for new assignments.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/frances ... g-grounds/

******

African Union Will Not Back ECOWAS Intervention in Niger
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 17, 2023

Image
Leaders of the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland, Niger’s ruling military junta, at a rally on August 6. Photo: Balima Boureima/Anadolu Agency

Niger’s popular military government has been consolidating domestic and regional support. Meanwhile, ECOWAS is beset by disunity and domestic opposition after threatening military intervention to restore the ousted Mohamed Bazoum with the backing of France and US

The African Union (AU) said on Wednesday, August 16, that it will not support the military intervention that the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is planning, with the backing of France and the US, to restore ousted Mohamed Bazoum to Niger’s presidency. Bazoum was deposed in a popularly-welcomed coup on July 26.

10 days after the expiry of the deadline given by ECOWAS to Niger’s military government to restore Bazoum, the sub-regional bloc is beset by internal disagreements and domestic opposition in its member states.

After the ECOWAS heads of states ordered on August 10 “the deployment of the ECOWAS Standby Force” and directed “the Chiefs of Defense Staffs to immediately activate” it, the chiefs were scheduled to meet on August 12 to set the wheels in motion.

However, due to “technical reasons,” the meeting was postponed, initially for an indefinite period. In the meantime, ECOWAS member Cabo Verde refused to support the military intervention, which its president Jose Maria Neves told AFP will only “make the situation worse, turning the region into an explosive zone.”

ECOWAS announced later on Tuesday that its member states’ chiefs of staffs will meet in Ghana’s capital Accra on Thursday and Friday to work out further details of the troop deployment.

Ghanaian MPs oppose deployment of its troops

Ahead of this meeting, an anti-war rally was reported on Monday, August 14, in Ghana’s city of Takoradi. Warning Ghana’s president, Nana Akufo-Addo, against dragging the county into a “proxy geopolitical confrontation,” opposition MPs objected to the deployment of Ghanaian troops as a part of the ECOWAS effort.

“Military deployment will be the straw that breaks the back of the camel of “stability” in many West African countries. It could provoke mutinies, and accelerate, rather than halt, the wave of coups d’etat the region is experiencing,” the Socialist Movement of Ghana (SMG) had earlier warned.

Should Akufo-Addo go on to send Ghanaian troops, the Ghana Union Movement (GUM), the country’s third largest party, will “back a very serious demonstration in the country,” its founder Christian Kwabena Andrews warned on Tuesday.

Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, MP from the largest opposition party National Democratic Congress (NDC) and a Ranking Member of Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee deemed “Akufo-Addo’s refusal to submit his Niger Policy to Parliament” as “most undemocratic.” His statement added, “West African leaders who purport to be lecturing Niger on democracy must be seen leading by example at home.”

With the NDC having the same number of seats in the parliament as the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP), Akufo-Addo may struggle to secure parliamentary approval to deploy Ghanaian troops.

ECOWAS chairperson unable to gain support of his own country’s senate

Nigeria’s senate earlier this month refused to support President Bola Tinubu’s plan to deploy troops. Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and its largest economy, amounting to about 67% of ECOWAS’ GDP. It also has the largest military in the bloc.

The killing of 23 army personnel on August 14 in an ambush by terrorists in Nigeria’s Niger state is another reminder of the pertinence of the senators’ warning that Nigeria’s military “is highly ill-equipped and not prepared to fight any war.”

Under the circumstances, they had argued, “the Federal Government should focus on solving the Boko Haram, banditry, and ESN/IPOB menaces… instead of contemplating going to war in a foreign country.”

Nevertheless, ECOWAS has persisted in threatening military intervention in Niger, even though Tinubu, who is its current chair, is unable to secure the support of his own senate for such an intervention.

Waving flags of Nigeria and Niger together, anti-war protesters, who took to the streets on Saturday in Nigeria’s Kano State on the border with Niger, sloganeered: “Nigeriens are our brothers; Nigeriens are also our family.” They denounced the plans for aggression against their northern neighbor as “a plot by Western forces.”

Image

Senegal and Benin have committed an unspecified number of troops for the ECOWAS invasion. Joining the fray is also Sierra Leone, whose president Julius Bio is facing a crisis of domestic legitimacy after retaining power in June this year in a violent election, the credibility of whose results is widely challenged by domestic observers, the US, UK, France and the EU.

Ivory Coast has committed 850 to 1,100 troops. “This coup d’etat is not acceptable,” maintains its president Alassane Ouattara, who came to power in 2011 with the help of a military offensive backed by US and France against the incumbent to whom Ouattara had officially lost a disputed election.

Liberia, along with Gambia — where the ECOWAS had previously intervened in 2017 — have been sitting on the fence, undecided as yet on whether or not to send troops.

ECOWAS backers, France and US, disagree

Further stultifying the bloc is the fact that strong disagreements are also surfacing between its main backers — Niger’s former colonizer France, which has up to 1,500 troops in the country, and the US, with another 1,100 troops in two bases.

Keener on military action, France is reportedly opposed to the US line of seeking further negotiations, and is unwilling to accept anything less than the reinstatement of its close ally Bazoum.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a former member of France’s National Assembly and leader of France Unbowed, termed the French backing of ECOWAS’ military action as “irresponsible amateurism.” He insisted that “France must not engage in a military expedition against” the AU’s decision opposing it.

While this fractured coalition against Niger has been wavering after ordering the “deployment of the ECOWAS Standby Force,” Niger has received firm support from Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea. All three were suspended and sanctioned by ECOWAS after similar popularly-supported coups, backed by anti-French mass movements.

Mali and Burkina Faso, whose popular military governments have successfully ordered the French troops out, have declared that their military forces will come to the defense of Niger, treating any attack on it as an attack also on them.

Niger’s military government consolidates domestic support

In the meantime, Niger’s military government, the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP), which ordered the French troops out soon after the coup against Bazoum, has been consolidating support domestically.

While France has refused to withdraw from Niger, arguing that it only recognizes the authority of Bazoum, thousands of Nigeriens protested outside its military base in capital Niamey last week.

On Monday, CNSP announced that Bazoum would be tried for “High Treason” for inviting foreign powers to invade Niger. The following day, Abdoulaye Seydou, leader of the M62 Movement which had been leading the protests demanding the removal of French and other foreign troops from the country, was released from prison.

Bazoum’s regime, which was cracking down on the anti-French movement, had arrested Seydou in January in what Frontline Defenders deemed to be an “arbitrary detention… directly linked to his peaceful and legitimate work in defense of human rights.”

Since the coup against Bazoum, tens of thousands have been taking part in demonstrations and rallies backing the CNSP against France and Bazoum, whom they perceive as the former colonizer’s puppet.

The statement released by the International Peoples’ Assembly (IPA) calling for the “immediate removal of foreign military bases from Niger and other African countries” was signed by organizations across the region such as Parti Comuniste de Benin, Nigerian Union of Allied Health Professionals, Socialist Movement of Ghana, Parti Communiste Révolutionaire de Côte d’Ivoire, Partido Africano para Independência de Guinee e Cabo Verde, Conféderation Libre des Travailleurs de la Mauritanie, Workers Democratic Way, The Collective of Saharawi Human Rights Defenders in Western Sahara, Communist Party of Jordan, Union of Iraqi Trade Unions, Party of Popular Socialist Coalition, Federation of Workers Councils and Unions, Tunisian Workers Party, Palestinian People Party, and the We Can Movement (Mauritania).

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... -in-niger/

******

The situation in Sudan for August 1 - 17, 2023
August 17, 2023
Rybar

Image

In Sudan , almost four months later, clashes continue between rebels from the Rapid Reaction Forces and government forces. More than 1,100 people have died and more than 12,000 have been injured in the conflict, according to the WHO .

At the same time, the civilian forces are not abandoning their efforts to achieve a ceasefire. Various options for a road map are being put forward to achieve a comprehensive political process.

The protracted conflict has turned into a war of attrition, focusing on the control of river bridges as important logistical routes that link different areas of the capital.

The course of hostilities
In western Sudan, in the city of Nyala and other parts of the state of South Darfur, clashes broke out between rebels from the Rapid Reaction Forces and government forces.

According to eyewitnesses, the latest outbreak of violence lasted three days . The Sudanese Armed Forces and the RRF accused each other of provocations and shelling of residential areas.

So, as a result of indiscriminate shelling, dozens of people were killed , including women and children. Casualty counts are still ongoing due to the difficulty of accessing some areas.

According to government sources, the IRF sent military reinforcements and carried out a four- pronged attack on Sudanese military command located west of Nyala .

In turn, Sudanese Air Force planes launched airstrikes on RRF deployment points in the Al-Baghir , Al-Masudia , Jadid and Soba areas southeast of the Sudanese capital city of Khartoum , on the left side of the Blue Nile tributary .

In response, the Rapid Reaction Force announced the downing of a Sudanese Air Force Su-25 combat aircraft over North Khartoum and repulsed a number of attacks by the Sudanese army.

Clashes also took place in the districts of Al-Samarab, Al-Droshab, Darduk in the northern part of the capital.

The Sudanese army is trying to take control of the Shambat Bridge , which connects the city of Omdurman with North Khartoum and is the main supply line for the RRF from the west of the country to the Khartoum agglomeration .

Clashes erupted between the Beni Halba and Salamat tribes in the Kutum town area in North Darfur state for four days, resulting in more than 100 people being killed and hundreds more injured.

The circle of inter-tribal violence has expanded to include the Habbaniya tribe in Buram district in southern South Darfur state. The reasons are mutual accusations of stealing livestock and the refusal of the Salamat tribe to support the RRF.

Fears are growing that the Darfur region will be drawn into civil war in light of the state of polarization. So most of the Arab tribes support the RRF, and the African ethnic groups accuse them of committing ethnic cleansing.

So far, the armed movements in Darfur have dismissed the ongoing conflict as "absurd". Only Mustafa Tambour's faction in the Sudan Liberation Movement supports the Sudanese government.

In turn, the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North, led by Abdel Aziz al-Hilu , supports the SBR. So between them and the Sudanese armed forces there were clashes in the city of Kadugli in the state of South Kordofan .

Negotiation process
Malik Agar , Vice President of the Sovereign Council of Sudan , has announced the launch of a road map that begins with achieving a ceasefire between government forces and the Rapid Reaction Force.

Agar called for an inclusive political process involving all civil forces. According to him, the multiplicity of negotiation platforms leads to the prolongation of the war and does not contribute to the resolution of the crisis.

In the capital of Ethiopia, the city of Addis Ababa, a meeting of the leaders of the civil forces who signed the framework agreement is being held to discuss the humanitarian situation and ways to end the war in Sudan.

According to Jaafar Hassan Othman , spokesman for the Forces for Freedom and Change coalition , "the meeting will discuss the political agenda to develop a concept for ending the war and restoring the country's civil and democratic path."

Other news

Facebook has censored all pages belonging to Muhammad Hamdan Daghlo "Hamedti " and the Rapid Reaction Force due to "disinformation spread by RRF supporters."

Nearly four months after the start of the civil war, Sudanese Army General and Chairman of the Sovereign Council of Sudan Abdel Fattah al-Burhan delivered a rare televised speech.

The general accused the anti-government Rapid Reaction Forces and their leader Hamedti of fomenting a civil war under "false promises to restore democracy."

Burhan's aide, Lieutenant General Yasser al-Atta , stated that "80 percent of the RRF have been destroyed and their forces are being replenished weekly by mercenaries from some of the western neighboring countries."

The Sudanese Civil Aviation Authority has announced the opening of the country's airspace to international shipping. Flight restrictions were introduced on April 22 in connection with the armed conflict.

On August 15, Sudan celebrated the 67th anniversary of the founding of the Sudanese Armed Forces under the slogan "The dignity of the army is the dignity of the people".

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-sudane-za ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 19, 2023 2:32 pm

Image

Amílcar Cabral remembered
By Paul Buhle (Posted Aug 18, 2023)

Image
Return to the Source: Selected Speeches of Amílcar Cabral,. Edited by Africa Information Service, Revised and Expanded by Tsenay Serequeberhan (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2023), 189pp., $20 paperback, $12 ebook, $89 cloth.

Only leftwing activists in Southeast New England are likely to have been fortunate enough to watch, if probably not take part, in the upsurge of Cape Verdean/American activism during the 1960s-80s. Immigrants from the little islands off the West Coast of Africa, in spits of land used for the slave trade, had early become sea hands by force of necessity. Hundreds or perhaps thousands had come ashore as early as the 1820s, intermarrying with Free Blacks and with Indigenous people. By the middle of the twentieth century, a significant number had become active in the National Maritime Union (NMU) dominated by the Left until McCarthyism swept labor. Charles Fortes, a legend in his own time, led the radicals, who sometimes joined the Communist Party but more often a branch of the International Workers Order (closed by courts in 1950), succeeded by local ethnic clubs with living memories of better times.

The story does not end here. For a time during the 1960s-70s, some descendants of Cape Verdeans became active supporters of the Black Panther Party, an affiliation or sympathy mirrored by a wider excitement around the revolution against the Portuguese colonialists on the islands and what would become Guinea-Bissau, on the mainland. This reviewer can testify to the crowds gathered in Providence, Rhode Island, to hear visiting speakers, but cannot testify to what was said. The “patois” or particular language of Cape Verdeans, a unique variant of Portuguese, did not even have a Cape Verdean/English dictionary until near the end of the twentieth century!

There our story of the book begins, generations previous. Amílcar Cabral (1924-73), raised in Bafata, the second-largest city in what would become the new country, showed great early promise as a student. The Portuguese colonists, unable to create a large or stable bureaucracy as richer European countries developed in Africa, promoted select “natives” to manage the bureaucracy of the region. Attending a Technical University in Lisbon during the 1950s, he met with others from Portugal’s African colonies and with them became active in planning an escape from the “methods” of the European “masters.”

A precocious thinker, Cabral rapidly assimilated their leading ideas, that is, Africanness, a rejection of prevailing European doctrines. This rejection had become easier after the Second World War, when the weakness and self-destructive nature of Europe had exposed any ideology of white superiority. The dictator of Portugal, António de Oliveira Salazar, continued to insist that Africa did not “exist,” that is, Africans were only a dark and inferior reflection of true human civilizations. If we do not recall that the famed anticommunist philosopher name this person fought tooth and nail against the establishment of Black History courses and departments during the late 1960s, we can scarcely appreciate how pervasive this view remained, and how many liberals shared the assumptions with conservatives.

Cabral, like Fanon and the Cameroonian philosopher Marcien Towa, among others, stressed that Africans needed to reclaim their humanity and their Africanness but that being exploited by fellow Africans provided no solution. National independence, when achieved, would offer temptations of neocolonial domination in a thousand forms, including prejudices of color and religion among Africans.

Return to the Source, a condensation of Cabral’s developing ideas until his assassination by Portuguese agents in 1973, reveals an astounding intellectual sophistication expressed in formulations clear enough for even the less educated among his audience of fellow Africans.

He explains that mainland Guinea, where most of the struggle takes place, has no mountains for guerillas to find an escape, but considerable distances between the limited urban areas. The weak Portuguese colonialists never gained much of a foothold outside the cities and became vulnerable to an organized guerilla force. The semi-assimilated section of the population, elsewhere a privileged group vulnerable to bribes of a better life than the “natives,” never reached two percent. For the same reasons, the division of leaders from followers among the revolutionary movement remained limited, even when the leadership necessarily arose from the educated petit bourgeoisie. Too weak to turn native land over to European settlers, the Portuguese did not challenge the common ownership of fertile zones, although the relationship of the occupier to the elite among chiefs offered temptations to the powerful, or rather, shared anxiety toward revolutionary change.

Cabral is singularly clear and predictive, for instance, in arguing that NATO is forever a source of colonialism and neocolonialism in supplying the Portuguese with weapons and strategy. Further, that African neighbors could not be counted upon to provide adequate support for the ongoing struggle, leaving what was then the East Bloc to fill the gap. As the military struggle advanced and the Portuguese held ever fewer sections of the country, cultural issues became more crucial: “national liberation is necessarily an act of culture.” (p.83).

This is a most subtle point. The cultural gap between the educated and uneducated, which consolidates the advantages of assimilating the European way of thinking and living, grows with the struggle. The old differences of class within the African population become more apparent, as those successful in colonial society, come to see their access to European-style education, their connections with mosques, their ability to travel and so on, as rightful possessions threatened by the struggle around them. Even the revolutionary leaders, Cabral warns, are mostly likely to come from this class, and find themselves culturally alienated from the masses.

Happily, a generation of left-wing scholars, mostly notably Basil Davidson, had established that an African genius of centuries standing existed in art and culture, not to mention the engineering genius to develop societies in the most extreme circumstances of floods, plagues, deserts, and so on. Cabral warns especially against an easy utopianism of thinking that the condition of local reality, geographical or cultural, can be ignored in offering a way out of colonialism. Ideology or ideas, even Marxist ideas, will not in themselves suffice.

Cabral says near the end of the book, in a crucial response to a question about Pan Africanism, that W.E.B. Du Bois is the real father of Pan Africanism and that this goal is not easily reached. He says Nkrumah had told him, “If I were to begin again, my approach would be different.” (p.153) It was not something to be assumed on the basis of race, Africanness. or anything else It had to grow out of the collective struggle for self-recognition.

At Cabral’s death, a great thinker, strategist and humanitarian was lost to the global struggle against colonialism and neocolonialism. Yet his work and memory remain, full of insights and inspiration.

https://mronline.org/2023/08/18/amilcar ... emembered/

******

Congo Joins the East African Community, but the Violence Goes On
By Ann Garrison - August 16, 2023 0

Image
[Source: blackagendareport.com

It is no secret that Rwanda has been behind 26 years of catastrophic war and occupation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), ever since its invasion, alongside Uganda, in 1996.

Uganda’s crimes get far less press than Rwanda’s, but they are well-documented in decades of UN experts’ reports.

This is a blatant violation of international law, but MONUSCO, the longest, most expensive peacekeeping operation in UN history, has failed to stop it despite billions of dollars spent.

Image
[Source: mapsofindia.com]

In 2013, after UN Security Council reports clearly documented that top Rwandan and Ugandan military officials were commanding the M23 militia in DRC, the UN launched the “Force Intervention Brigade,” which drove M23 back into Rwanda and Uganda. However, Western-engineered “peace talks” then handed the territory that M23 had occupied right back to them. Colonel Mamadou Mustafa Ndala, the Congolese hero who had led the successful military campaign, was assassinated shortly thereafter.

Image
Colonel Mamdou with a flag draped around him [Source: virunganews.com]

This evidenced that the war and occupation were working out just fine for the world’s major powers, whose corporations were all benefiting from their deals to buy minerals smuggled out of DRC through Rwanda and Uganda. These same powers welcomed the latest stage of this operation, DRC’s integration into the East African Community (EAC), despite the fact that Rwanda and Uganda are members. The Democratic Republic of the Congo acceded to the EAC Treaty on April 8, 2022, and became a full member on July 11, 2022.

Image
DRC formally joining the East African Community (EAC) after the signing of the Treaty of the Accession of the DRC into the EAC in Nairobi, Kenya. [Source: eac.int]

Then, in another illogical development some months later, Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi allowed East African Standby Forces into the DRC to fight M23 and other militia groups. The East African Standby Forces include troops from Burundi, Comoros, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, Sudan, and Uganda. President Tshisekedi himself said, “The mission is delicate, as some countries are suspected to be part of the armed groups,” but without naming the countries.

I spoke to Dr. Jean-Claude Maswana, Congolese economist and professor at Kyoto’s Ritsumeikan University, about the integration.


Image
[Source: researchgate.net]

Ann Garrison: The Democratic Republic of the Congo is not part of East Africa. It’s the heart of Central Africa. Does it make any sense for it to join the East African Community?

Jean-Claude Maswana: Geographically, the DRC is not part of East Africa, and in the past no one speculated or explored the idea of it joining the East African Community. It is both a central African and southern African nation, and it makes no sense for it to join the EAC, which includes the very countries that have invaded and looted its resources—most of all Rwanda and Uganda. The historic context that you provided highlights the damage that these two countries have done in the DRC, including the violation of international law and the exploitation of its mineral resources.

So how could joining the EAC possibly serve the DRC’s sovereignty and interests? Why would it do anything but perpetuate the exploitation and injustice?

The very same firms and countries benefiting from the looting of DRC’s minerals also welcomed its integration into the EAC, making it even more likely that the agreement will simply perpetuate the exploitation and injustice.

Image
Coltan mine in the DRC. [Source: greenleft.org.au]

AG: So this does not make any sense for the Congolese people, but apparently it made sense to President Felix Tshisekedi and other officials. Why would that be?

JCM: To understand this, one thing we have to look at is how President Tshisekedi came to power. The 2018 Congolese presidential election was stolen for him.

That election should have taken place two years earlier, but then President Joseph Kabila and his ruling party clung to power by telling the Congolese that the country lacked the necessary infrastructure to hold a nationwide election. This simply reflected their own failure to build the transportation and communications networks essential to a modern domestic economy and political system, and the Congolese people knew this.

Kabila’s candidate, Emmanuel Shadary, so clearly lost the election that Kabila couldn’t steal it for him. The Congolese people no doubt voted to reject the Kabila regime as much as anything else, not to elect a Kabila collaborator.

Image
Former Congolese President Joseph Kabila. [Source: newsweek.com]

Image
Emmanuel Shadary [Source: bbc.com]

AG: I remember that the Catholic Church took great pains to monitor those election results and concluded that Martin Fayulu had won, as was reported by The New York Times, but Kabila apparently struck a deal with Tshisekedi, who had most likely come in second.

Image
Martin Fayulu [Source: wikipedia.org]

JCM: That’s right. President Tshisekedi therefore came to power without the people’s mandate and had to seek legitimacy elsewhere. He and former President Kabila reached an arrangement with then Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, and Rwandan President Paul Kagame to validate his presidency. Kagame was at that time the president of the African Union, so his support carried particular weight.

This political arrangement no doubt has something to do with Tshisekedi’s bizarre decision to bring DRC into the EAC.

Image
Ugandan leader Yoweri Museveni, Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta and Rwandan President Paul Kagame. [Source: dailyactive.info]

AG: Does this legitimize the illegal mineral trafficking?

JCM: Many observers see this as a strategic move to legitimize the illegal mineral trafficking and divert attention from demands that Rwanda and Uganda be held accountable for their immense crimes in the DRC.

As the DRC government was gearing up to formally join the EAC, DRC officials rejected concerns about Rwanda and Uganda. It was obvious that the DRC’s membership in the EAC would undermine efforts for justice, transparency and sustainable development, but they didn’t care. For the most part they don’t represent the Congolese people.

AG: Is there any evidence that Tshisekedi and the other DRC officials you refer to are benefiting financially from this irrational integration?

JCM: There is no definitive evidence, to the best of my knowledge. But given the widespread embezzlement of public funds, large-scale money laundering, and licit/illicit trafficking in minerals—to which the Tshisekedi family is deeply associated—it is hard to rule out the idea that the DRC officials are financially benefiting from this irrational integration.

AG: It’s been reported for years that Rwandans and Ugandans, but especially Rwandans, have actually infiltrated the Congolese government and army. Sometimes elements of the government and army are referred to as “Rwandaphone,” indicating that their sympathies and interests are with Rwanda. Do you believe that that affected this decision?

JCM: That is likely to be the case.

AG: What has it ultimately meant for DRC to join the East African Community (EAC)? Is the EAC a common market like the European Economic Community?

JCM: The European Economic Community, or Common Market, established in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome, primarily focused on economic integration among influential industrial nations. Its core objective was to foster economic cooperation and eliminate trade barriers like tariffs, quotas and licenses to import or export.

The EAC also creates a common market. This means that they share the same economy, which means that Rwandan and Ugandan companies will be operating in the DRC as Congolese companies do, without tariffs, quotas or licenses. There will not be any national distinction when it comes to business or markets. It’s a regional economic integration scheme.

Unlike the EU Common Market, however, which facilitated integration among manufacturers, the EAC predominantly represents an integration of nations which still depend on foreign capital and lack significant domestic production capabilities. Foreign capitalists are looking for natural resources, many of which have in the past been looted from the DRC by its neighbors Rwanda and Uganda.

The EAC also serves as a platform for collaboration across various sectors, aiming to boost economic and infrastructure development within its member states but, given Rwanda and Uganda’s history of aggression, the downside is far greater than any potential upside to this for DRC.

AG: Does the integration mean that Rwandans and Ugandans who had been running illegal mining operations in DRC can now have paper making them legal?

JCM: Yes, now they can secure paper.

AG: But we still hear reports of looting. How should we understand that?

JCM: Looting remains the cheapest means of exploiting DRC’s resources. It will not disappear overnight. It will not disappear without the presence of a functioning state in DRC.

AG: This membership in the EAC also hasn’t stopped the horrific violence either. If anything it seems to have gotten worse in the past year, since DRC joined the EAC. Why is that?

JCM: That was expected. The aim of joining the EAC was not to ease or end violence in eastern DRC. No objective observers and analysts expected such an ill-advised decision to somehow end the violence.

AG: But if they now have paper, why are they still fighting and massacring Congolese people? Is this because they have actual territorial ambitions in DRC?

For years I have heard that Kagame would like to drive Congolese out of the Kivu Provinces, populate them with Rwandans, and then hold referendums on whether or not those provinces would like to leave DRC to become part of Rwanda. This would be consistent with the massacres that have driven millions of Congolese into refugee camps, and reports that Rwandan settlers have followed the Rwandan militias. Is that what’s going on?

JCM: In part, yes. The violence in eastern DRC is multifaceted. Kagame’s agenda or dream to wipe out the population in Kivu, as crazy as that may sound, would not have materialized if the DRC had decent leaders. What Kagame can do in the DRC would be impossible for him to do in Burundi, for example. The leadership deficit in the DRC has no precedent in African history. It is a sad truth that cannot be denied.

AG: In the press there is far more emphasis on Rwanda’s aggression than Uganda’s, though both have been occupying and plundering the DRC since 1996. Why do you think that is?

JCM: The difference has to do with both the scale of the plunder and killings. Numerous UN Experts Reports indicate that the scale of the plunder of the DRC resources by Rwanda involve mostly precious metals whose value is higher than those exploited by Uganda.

Also, in reports such as the “UN Mapping Exercise Report” on crimes committed in the DRC 1993 to 2003, most of the massacres identified were committed by Rwandans.

Of course, Rwanda and some others deny that Rwanda has ever done anything in the DRC that deserves condemnation. Astonishingly, the current Tshisekedi government suggested that what has been happening in the DRC is “collateral damage” that should be blamed on the Congolese people themselves.

Image
Rwandan M23 militias en route to Goma. [Source: theconversation.com]

AG: Now what about this bizarre deployment of East African Standby Forces, including Rwandan and Ugandan troops, to, they say, quell the violence in eastern DRC? How could this make any sense?

JCM: It doesn’t. Who would imagine that Ugandan and Rwandan troops would stop their own troops disguised as Congolese armed groups? Why would Rwanda—which has one of the most powerful armies in the EAC—let the EAC fight and neutralize its own troops operating as M23? How does it make sense to expect Kenyan troops to engage and neutralize the M23 armed groups [Rwandan troops] while those Kenyan troops and their military equipment are entering the DRC via Rwanda, whose troops are in fact M23? The security situation could only get worse as the perpetrators were officially brought into the eastern DRC and thus allowed to strengthen their presence and operations.

AG: Is it conceivable that DRC could get out of the EAC now that it’s in?

JCM: Affirmative.

AG: How has the international community responded to Congo’s integration into the EAC and creation of the East African Standby Force?

JCM: As expected, with less to no interest.

AG: When we talk about “the international community,” we typically mean North America, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand, which make a lot of hypocritical noise about their liberal values and concern with human rights. But does what you just said apply to Russia and China? Is there any difference in Russia and China’s interactions with the DRC?

JCM: None, as far as I can tell.

AG: Uganda and Rwanda, and especially Rwanda, are known to be aggressors in the DRC, but you have also mentioned Burundi and Kenya. Can you tell us what role Burundi plays?

JCM: Burundi was part of the initial invasion in 1996-97 and has since been part of the problem in eastern DRC. There are Burundian militias operating on the DRC side of the Rwandan and Burundian border, but they are not working with the Rwandans and Ugandans and are not nearly as great a problem.

AG: Can you tell us about the role that Kenya plays in all of this?

JCM: Kenya is an EAC member country and is both economically and politically close to the current regime in Rwanda. Many observers consider Kenya as an arm of Rwanda in the region. Whenever Kenya acts as a political broker in DRC issues, the “invisible hand” of Rwanda seems to be behind it.

AG: Rwanda and Uganda are often at odds and skirmishing on their two borders. In 2008, Rwandan and Ugandan militias famously waged war over the diamonds in Kisangani. Can they nevertheless be understood to be working in tandem to colonize DRC?

JCM: Yes, their bilateral differences do not distract them from their shared agenda in the DRC.

Image
Ugandan army troops in Congo. [Source: bbc.com]

AG: You say the international community was glad to see Rwanda and Uganda’s looting of eastern DRC legitimized, but what have they had to say about the ongoing violence?

JCM: First, the DRC is not Ukraine. It’s not a white, European nation. So, nobody is expected to care that much about what is happening there. Second, even the DRC government does not care about the ongoing violence. Third, following the DRC government, which has been unwilling to officially declare war against the EAC invaders, the international community has released some statements of good intentions and expressed wishes that the violence stop.

AG: I want to ask about the Allied Defense Forces (ADF), a militia operating in the DRC, across the border with Uganda but far less well-known than M23. This group had vanished for years when it suddenly reappeared, causing many to doubt its reality, and it’s often paired with stories that ISIS is in DRC, which seems absurd because the population is nearly 96% Christian, and only 1.5% Islamic. This group has been the excuse for Ugandan troops to enter DRC, just as the FDLR has been the excuse for Rwanda. What do you make of the ADF and the claim that ISIS is in DRC?

JCM: As you rightly pointed out, it is clear that the so-called ADF has no claim [religious or political] in the DRC and must have been created to serve the territorial and economic ambitions of neighboring countries, particularly Uganda.

Image
Allied Defense Forces in Congo. [Source: intelligencebriefs.com]

AG: At the same time that we hear about Rwanda and Uganda’s violence in eastern DRC, we hear about the horrific exploitation of Congolese laboring in the cobalt mines in southeastern DRC, far from the Kivu Provinces. They’re reported to work for as little as $1/day, as artisanal miners, in brutal and poisonous conditions. Is this a problem separate from the foreign aggression in the Kivus?


JCM: It is not a separate problem as far as the exploitation of the DRC’s mineral wealth is concerned. The modus operandi is just different.

AG: What could the government do about the exploitation in the cobalt mines?

JCM: The DRC government’s officials are mostly part of the problem, as most of them benefit from the illegal exploitation and traffic of cobalt. Nevertheless, in normal circumstances the government should enhance its law enforcement capabilities to crack down on illegal cobalt mining and exploitation. This includes investigating and prosecuting those involved in violence, labor abuses, and illegal mining operations, regardless of their positions. Also, the government needs to take strong action against corrupt officials involved in illegal cobalt mining and forced labor. Moreover, it can be considered the creation of independent oversight and auditing bodies to monitor the mining industry’s activities and ensure compliance with regulations. This can help identify and address illegal practices and human rights abuses.

AG: And what about the international community, including both China and the Western powers?

JCM: The international community, including China, could take a strong stance against impunity, corruption and bribery involving cobalt mining in the DRC if the moral will existed there. Putting in place strict sanctions against firms and individuals, including officials and their family members acting on their behalf, could deter some of the inhumane practices taking place around the cobalt exploitation and traffic. Also, encouraging ethical business practices and accountability could help reduce the influence of corrupt officials and entities in the industry.

However, ultimately, only the Congolese people can reclaim their right to their own resources and to a decent life for all.

https://covertactionmagazine.com/2023/0 ... e-goes-on/

******

Nigerien coup spearheads a popular revolution

Another Sahel comprador regime has fallen to a popular movement led by patriotic army officers. The contagion is bound to spread.
Proletarian TV

Friday 18 August 2023



The video above is taken from the Hindustan Times YouTube channel and shows footage of a 30,000-strong demonstration in Nigerien capital Naimey in support of the coup government.

*****

On 26 July, units of his presidential guard arrested Niger’s president, Mohammed Bazoum. The guards proceeded to dismiss the regime headed by Ouhoumodou Mohamadou, and head of the presidential guard General Abdourahamne Tchiani was declared the leader of a new government entitled the ‘National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland’.

It soon became clear that this was no mere squabble between rival factions of the Nigerien ruling class. Actions in the streets showed unequivocally that the coup leaders had mass support – not only in Niger itself but also across the wider Sahel region.

In its first official communique, the new government declared that the deposed President Bazoum had “tried to convince people that everything is going well, despite the harsh reality of a lot of death, displacement, humiliation and frustration. Today’s approach has not brought security despite great sacrifices.” It also denounced the “lack of measures to face the economic crisis and the deterioration of the security situation”.

The coup brought to the surface a myriad issues from which the country has been suffering for decades – and highlighted that the unifying factor behind all these problems is the ongoing role played by French imperialism. This is the case not only in Niger, but in all the nations that won formal independence from France as a result of their postwar anticolonial revolutions.

The genuine mass support gained by the new government in response to its anti-French actions shows clearly that the Nigerien masses understand very well who is responsible for the problems in their country – problems that persist despite the presence of vast deposits of iron ore, gold, uranium and oil.

Despite this vast mineral wealth. the Nigerien people remain mired in poverty, with an average monthly income of just $51 per month. While possessing vast deposits of uranium, which is used to power French nuclear plants, only one in seven Nigeriens is connected to the electricity grid. Less than a fifth of the population live in the cities, while the rest are still trying to scratch a scant living out of subsistence agriculture.

This lack of development is also revealed in the obscenely low level of literacy: only 37 percent of the Nigerien population can read.

Meanwhile, the industrial extraction of Niger’s uranium has created a veritable pandemic in cancer cases amongst mining communities, alongside ecological devastation resulting from unsafe extraction practices.

These problems all originate from the deliberately truncated form of independence that the French colonialists granted to their former colonies, which was always designed to choke any economic or political developments that might threaten their domination of these nations – and therefore their ability to extract maximum profit from African resources.

Independence and neocolonialism
Niger received its formal independence from France in 1960, having previously been part of the vast colony known as ‘French West Africa’. This followed a series of wars and uprisings against all the European colonial powers.

Inspired by the October Revolution in Russia, the anticolonial revolution swept the Dutch out of Indonesia, the French out of Indochina and the British out of India. While this revolutionary wave was uneven, including some temporary setbacks and defeats for the oppressed peoples, the ultimate rout of the colonial powers was irreversible.

In France’s case, it was the war and defeat in Algeria that caused the imperialists the most problems. After more than a decade of the most brutal warfare, the French Fourth Republic actually collapsed, being overturned by a military coup in 1958 that brought the wartime resistance hero General Charles De Gaulle back into power.

De Gaulle was smart enough to know that continuing to fight large-scale wars to prevent the independence of the colonies was too risky a proposition, and so he moved France to a new position whereby she accepted that formal independence was inevitable. This caused a major revolt within France’s ultra-reactionary officer corps, whose members actually attempted to assassinate him in response to negotiations that led to the end of the war and Algerian independence.

The independence of Niger swiftly followed, with the new republic being granted full independence from France in 1960. Even before independence had been granted, however, the French imperialists were suppressing political forces that might threaten their continued exploitation of the country.

In 1957, Djibo Bakary of the Mouvement Socialiste Africain was elected to head the government, but was overthrown and exiled by the French in 1958. The socialist and pan-Africanist movement was then suppressed by regimes whose leaders had been handpicked by the French.

As a result of its people’s constantly frustrated attempts to realise true independence, Niger has been plagued by economic and political instability, with the latest coup being the sixth in its turbulent history.

Clearly, French imperialism was not willing to give up the very profitable exploitation of the African nations in which they had been freely engaged for over a century. As former French presidents François Mitterand and Jacques Chirac observed, without being able to exploit the wealth of the African nations, the French ruling class “is nothing”.

The same problem confronted all the imperialists that had been obliged to end direct occupation of their colonies. They needed a new system whereby they could retain their ability to extract superprofits from the hyperexploitation of the workers and resources of these countries.

As VI Lenin noted in his work Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, one of the key features of the imperialist system is that the advanced capitalist nations become overwhelmingly engaged in the export of capital rather than of commodities. In the period after the anticolonial revolutionary wave this remained the case, but the approach had to be modified now that the imperialists were locked in a battle against forms of revolutionary nationalism and socialism that were inspiring uprisings across the globe.

The imperialist powers used the domination that they still exercised over the economies of the newly-independent countries to keep a stranglehold on their development. What imperialism requires of countries such as Niger, Kenya, Mali or Burkina Faso is that they continue to act purely as sites of resource extraction. As Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni (who is certainly no communist) pointed out in his recent speech to the Russia-Africa summit, the imperialist powers seek only to take raw materials and agricultural produce out of Africa, which they can turn into marketable commodities elsewhere.

What this means is that the African states are paid very little for these raw materials, either in terms of the prices set or the wages that are paid to the hyperexploited workers. President Museveni’s point was that this system has Africa poor by ensuring it remains underdeveloped and is unable to build up a strong industrial base.

Whether Museveni knew it or not, he was actually reflecting the work of the great Guyanese Marxist historian Walter Rodney, who wrote in his seminal work How Europe Underdeveloped Africa: “What was called ‘the development of Africa’ by the colonialists was a cynical shorthand expression for ‘the intensification of colonial exploitation in Africa to develop capitalist Europe’.” (1972)

Not only was this true in the high period of colonialism, but it has remained the case, albeit in a modified form, throughout the modern neocolonial period. The concept of neocolonialism was developed by the anti-imperialist pan-African leader Kwame Nkrumah, who became the first president of Ghana after leading a long campaign against British colonialism.

When confronting the difficulties faced by the new nation in escaping imperialist control, Nkrumah pointed out the mechanisms by which the former colonisers retained their ability to exploit the newly independent nations: “The essence of neocolonialism is that the state which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty. In reality its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside.” (Neo-Colonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism, 1965)

Nkrumah’s definition certainly applies to nations such as Niger, whose natural resources continue to be controlled by and sold to the imperialists. A look at the uranium mining industry in Niger reveals just how this works.

A 63 percent stake in Niger’s uranium mines is currently held by the Orano corporation, with the remainder being owned by the Nigerien state mining company. Orano’s biggest shareholder is the French state, which owns 45.2 percent of the shares – enough to dictate all the company’s decisions.

According to data from the World Nuclear Association, Orano is one of the top three producers of uranium in the world. The company’s most recent profit report shows revenue of €4.2bn, which is predicted to rise to at least €4.3bn this year. The uranium mining business is plainly a very profitable one for the French state and Niger is a crucial part of this.

French state energy company EDF also depends upon Nigerien uranium to fuel its nuclear reactors, with 20 percent of the uranium it uses every year coming from Niger’s mines.

Such a profitable business being controlled almost entirely by the old colonial power after more than 60 years of ‘independence’ reveals how right Comrade Nkrumah was regarding the power of the neo-colonial system when he observed:

“If Africa’s multiple resources were used in her own development, they could place her among the modernised continents of the world. But her resources have been, and still are being used for the greater development of overseas interests.” (Ibid)

Niger’s independence (and that of many other former French colonies) has also been compromised by the imposition of the CFA Franc. This currency was launched in 1945 following the devaluation of the French franc after it was pegged to the dollar. In essence, use of the CFA Franc ensures that French goods can be exported without any trade barriers to the former French colonies, whilst raw materials (such as uranium) are sent back to France.

Controlling their currency also allowed the French government to control the monetary policies of its former colonies. With the launch of the Euro in 1999, this control passed to the European Central Bank, an institution that is even further removed from any influence by the Nigerien people.

Another condition imposed on the countries using the CFA Franc is that they have to deposit 50 percent of their foreign assets in the French treasury. The system is structured in such a way as to ensure that these supposedly independent governments are in effect stuck with a situation in which it is easy for French capital and goods to flow into Niger and also easy for resources to be exported out.

Combine that with continued French control over monetary policy and you have a strong system of neocolonial control that has kept Niger poor and underdeveloped – with devastating consequences for the Nigerien proletariat and peasantry.

Another facet of the neocolonial system everywhere has been the weaponisation of debt. According to the latest International Monetary Fund (IMF) report, Niger’s total government debt for 2023 amounts to 51.3 percent of GDP, or $4.9bn. For the imperialists, the indebtedness of poor and underdeveloped countries such as Niger provides them with excellent opportunities for exerting pressure over the government.

As Thomas Sankara observed in a speech given just before his murder in 1987: “Under its current form, controlled and dominated by imperialism, debt is a skilfully managed reconquest of Africa, intended to subjugate its growth and development through foreign rules.” (A united front against debt, 29 July 1987)

Another crucial pillar of neocolonialism is the imperialists’ ability to maintain a relatively large-scale military presence in their former colonies. In the Sahel region, French armed forces have reinserted themselves in considerable numbers under the guise of a ‘war against terrorism’, supposedly being waged against the jihadist groups that have conveniently appeared in Burkina Faso, Mali, the Central African Republic and Niger in the last two decades.

Since the destruction of Libya, brutally effected by the USA, France and Britain in 2011, jihadist attacks in Niger have become far worse. The region has been flooded with weaponry taken from the stockpiles of the old Libyan army combined with the arms that the imperialists provided to their proxy forces. Under the pretext of fighting al-Qaeda and/or Isis, the USA also compelled Niger to accept the establishment of a base for its airborne drone fleet, where at least 1,000 personnel are stationed.

All of this has been done in the name of ‘fighting extremism’, but despite the propaganda pumped out by bourgeois media in the imperialist countries, the French military presence has not only failed to quell the insurgencies but has, in fact, worsened them.

Despite the presence of 1,000 French forces, jihadi attacks continue to worsen in Niger, with casualties often numbering near 100 mostly military personnel or police forces. The Nigerien masses are plainly aware that the US and French armies are not in the country for their protection but to secure the economic interests of their imperialist masters.

Hence the ongoing mass demonstrations outside French bases since the new government took power.

A growing rebellion and the role of Russia
The events in Niger follow similar coups in Burkina Faso, Mali and Guinea, which have all seen nationalist military officers take power.

Each of these countries have suffered from similar problems to those of Niger, and have long chafed under French neocolonial control. All three governments have stated their vehement opposition to the proposal tgat the Nigerian government should lead an invasion of Niger to reinstall Bazoum’s ousted regime. They have been joined in this by Algeria, which, though it called for the reinstatement of civilian government, made clear its rejection of any military intervention.

So far, the countries of the Economic Community of West African States (Ecowas) have been divided over a potential military intervention, no doubt influenced by the firm backing for Niger from the more anticolonial governments amongst them. It must be noted that Ecowas is an organisation that consists of former French, British and Portuguese colonies, with the leading economic and military force being Nigeria.

Nigerian president Bola Tinubu has been the most enthusiastic about an Ecowas intervention, but even in government circles this has provoked division, with Nigeria’s senate recently voting against military intervention. At the time of writing, the African Union has also voted to oppose military action against Niger.

This division amongst African governments reflects not only the weakening hold of imperialism but also the fear that many of the comprador regimes have of arousing the sympathy of their own hard-pressed masses for the anti-imperialist cause.

In the case of Burkina Faso, new president Ibrahim Traore has taken direct inspiration from the unfinished revolution of the great Thomas Sankara. In his recent speech to the Russia-Africa summit, President Traore stated that the Burkinabe government had formed new people’s volunteer units in order to defend the revolution against both the imperialists and the reactionary jihadist forces.

This mobilisation of the masses in defence of their nation is crucial for the development of the fight against imperialism – in Niger as elsewhere.

As Mao Zedong pointed out when speaking of the power of the peasant masses in the Chinese Revolution: “They will smash all the trammels that bind them and rush forward along the road to liberation. They will sweep all the imperialists, warlords, corrupt officials, local tyrants and evil gentry into their graves.” (Report on an investigation of the peasant movement in Hunan, March 1927)

What is unfolding in Niger cannot be dismissed as a mere military putsch. It is clear that the great masses of Africa are beginning to rise again. The historic setback that was inflicted on their progress by the collapse of the USSR is beginning to be reversed.

The rise of China and the impending defeat of the Nato imperialist led forces by Russia in Ukraine has given fresh inspiration to millions of workers and peasants across the world, and particularly in Africa. If Niger is successful in freeing itself from French colonialism, there is every chance that this new revolutionary wave will spread, threatening the hold of the British imperialists in places like Kenya, and the role of the USA as the military guarantor of its European underlings will be called into question.

A successful African liberation struggle will be a fatal blow to the already weakened, parasitic European and British imperialist powers, and it is for this reason that workers in these countries must stand in solidarity with the Nigerien people in their just struggle for freedom from imperialist domination.

­https://thecommunists.org/2023/08/18/ne ... evolution/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 23, 2023 2:57 pm

AUGUST 23, 2023 BY M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
Niger revolution takes Bonapartist turn

Image
General Abdouramane Tchiani who assumed power in Niger on August 26, 2023, previously headed the elite Presidential Guards

The 4-week old turmoil in the West African state of Niger is taking a curious turn that no longer allows a binary vision of “neo-colonialism and imperialism” versus “national liberation”. Niger’s coup leaders are making overtures to the United States and keeping the Russian military contractors, Wagner PMC, at arm’s length — at least, at the present stage of transition of power.

The speed with which Washington deployed Kathleen FitzGibbon, an ace Africa hand with intelligence background, as its new ambassador to Niamey signals diplomacy as the preferred course while keeping all options on the table.

Significantly, in an editorial, Washington Post took note today that “The two armies [US and Nigerian] have worked closely together over the past decade: Officers are familiar with one another, and Niger’s generals have not been considered anti-American.”

Equally, the US state department readout on Ambassador FitzGibbon highlighted that her rushed assignment aims to “bolster efforts to help resolve the political crisis at this critical time” and that her “diplomatic focus will be to advocate for a diplomatic solution.”

Interestingly, the readout limits itself to call for the release of the ousted president and his family members and ignored the earlier specific demand regarding his reinstatement. The readout hints that the US diplomacy is casting the net wide and will not limit itself to the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

On the eve of Ambassador FitzGibbon’s arrival in Niamey, New York Times carried an interview with Ali Lamine Zeine, the prime minister-designate of Niger. Most certainly, Zeine, the topmost civilian official in the military junta, spoke for the generals and was addressing the western audience.

Zeine’s remarks suggest that the ruling cabal in Niamey are a smart lot and could be in the long game, who seek a direct engagement with the US. Indeed, the ECOWAS itself is caught in two minds after its first face-to-face interaction with the coup leader General Abdouramane Tchiani in the weekend.

The ECOWAS mediatory mission was led by General Abdulsalami Abubakar, the enormously influential statesman and king maker, who was Nigeria’s last military head of state and a source of moral authority who had kept his word to hand over power to a democratically elected government, making the long-awaited dream of Nigerians a reality.

After returning from Niamey, Abubakar briefed President Bola Tinubu and later spoke to the media where he expressed optimism that the crisis in Niger is not likely to deteriorate beyond diplomacy. Asked if there was any possibility of avoiding a military action by ECOWAS in Niger, Abubakar stated: “Hopefully, diplomacy will see the better of this. Nobody wants to go war, it doesn’t pay anybody, but then again, our leaders have said if all fails — and I don’t think all will fail, we’ll get somewhere, we’ll get out of this mess.”

Succinctly put, Niger faces a “messy” situation rather than a revolutionary situation. Perhaps, certain Bonapartist elements are discernible — for which, of course, there is plenty of blame to go around, as Africa’s elites and their failures are a major factor, not only because public opinion associates them with France but due to twin malaise of a poverty of political ideologies and populism, apart from the rise of new generations of young people frustrated by a status quo that, in their eyes, is of France’s making.

Importantly, therefore, the threat of Russia filling the vacuum is overstated and should not justify Western intervention. What needs to be understood is that part of of Russia’s appeal is that many Africans see Moscow as sort of “anti-France”. Conversely, the less France lives as an exploitative ex-colonial power in the popular imagination, the less Russia’s symbolic appeal will become.

One can see that Russians themselves understand this behind Moscow’s anti-colonial, anti-imperialist rhetoric. A commentary in the Russian daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta noted three days ago that “For the Russian Federation, it is noteworthy that the putschists for the first time dissociated themselves from Russia and the Wagner PMCs, assuring the West that they were ready to conduct political and economic cooperation with it.”

However, General Tchiani, who heads the putschists, is not going to give up power. On the other hand, he no longer repeats that former president Bazum will be put on trial. The ECOWAS delegation who met the ousted President Mohamed Bazoum, estimated that he isn’t in any imminent danger. The putschists have heeded Washington’s stern warning.

General Tchiani is also distancing himself from raucous public support of the putschists, which seems to embarrass him. The salience, according to the Russian daily, is that “judging by the recent actions and statements of the Niger military, they really do not want to sever all opportunities for dialogue with France, the United States and the organisations they support.

In the New York Times interview, Zeine outlined the ideas of the new authorities’ foreign policy priorities. He categorically rejected the assumptions and claims that Moscow was behind the coup. “I don’t see any intentions from the military government of Niger to cooperate with Russia or with the Wagner group,” Zeine said.

He even cautioned the West to be discreet not to push Niger into the arms of the Wagner. (According to reports, the redoubtable head of Wagner Yevgeny Prigozhin has flown into neighbouring Mali in Sahel, fuelling speculations.)

Most important, Zeine clearly told New York Times that the pro-French foreign policy vector will remain unchanged for Niger even under the new authorities. “We studied at French universities, our officers studied in France,” he said.

On the whole, Nezavisimaya Gazeta wryly noted, “Judging by the interview, the only thing that Tchiani and his associates are seeking is a revision of the terms of cooperation with the former metropolis. As Zeine put it, “we just want to be respected.” Conceivably, this refers to the revision of the conditions for the extraction of Niger’s uranium and gold reserves. Both are now suspended.

That said, there is great uncertainty regarding the actual intentions of the protagonists. Is the junta, which has class or corporate interests, seeking some concessions to save face or is merely buying time? Is the West scaling down its earlier strident demands of immediate restoration of democratic rule to a modest realistic expectation to let Bazoum go into exile and pin down the putschists to a timeline for transfer of power to an elected government? There are no easy answers.

One significant straw in the wind is that the African Union, at a session in its headquarters in Addis Ababa on Tuesday, while suspending Niger’s membership, decided that it needed time to study the implications of any armed intervention in that country.

The domestic opinion within Nigeria is also vehemently opposed to any ECOWAS military intervention. After all, similar past interventions in Liberia and Sierra Leone didn’t have happy endings Nigeria which was led up the garden path by Western powers and left holding the can of worms. Nigeria has its hands full with a serious internal security situation that allows no distractions. The northern Nigerian provinces have tribal, ethnic affinities with Niger and have come out against war.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/niger-r ... tist-turn/

******

The Stalled Decolonization
AUGUST 22, 2023

Image
The African Black Defense League (LDNA) demonstrates in front of the Ministry of the Armed Forces and compares France to the Islamic State. She calls on “the African population and the diaspora to show their hostility towards the French army”. Photo: Peoples Democracy/File photo.

By Prabhat Patnaik – Aug 20, 2023

MUCH of the ex-colonial world, having set up dirigiste regimes to wrest control over its natural resources from metropolitan capital and to build up industries behind protectionist walls, was sought to be re-assimilated into imperialist hegemony through the neo-liberal economic order; but in one segment of this world decolonisation itself was never completed. The former French colonies of West Africa belong to this segment. Even though local personnel replaced French administrators, they did not effectively shake off French hegemony, and by implication metropolitan hegemony even temporarily.

French troops continued to be stationed in each of those countries; and they were bound by a currency union with France, where their currency, the CFA franc (started in 1945), had a fixed exchange rate with the old French franc (and subsequently with the euro), an exchange rate moreover that was always kept somewhat over-valued. In any currency union, the segment that has the over-valued currency becomes less competitive and gets afflicted with de-industrialisation and unemployment, as had happened with East Germany after the German “re-unification”. In the case of Francophone Africa, currency union with France at an over-valued exchange rate doomed these countries to a permanent absence of industry: no industrial good could be produced domestically in any country because it was always cheaper to import it from France (which also gave the latter a perennially captive market). On the other hand, the primary commodities that were exported from these countries had to sell in the international market at certain fixed dollar (and hence Franc) prices, and an over-valued currency simply meant that domestic wages had to be suitably adjusted downwards to keep these countries internationally competitive in primary commodity markets. The net result therefore was that the local population did not gain in terms of wage rates but lost out in terms of employment (which then had second-order effects on wage rates too). These countries in short were doomed to a permanent state of underdevelopment and abject poverty.

But that was not all. The bulk of their foreign exchange reserves (at least 50 per cent) were kept in France, as had been the case with colonial India, which boosted the foreign exchange resources available to France. And to maintain the fixed exchange rate with the French currency, it was considered necessary that their monetary policy should be aligned with that of France, for which it had to be controlled by the French monetary authorities; this removed a possible tool for initiating economic development from their armoury.

This bizarre state of affairs was maintained politically by a variety of measures, from rigged elections behind a democratic facade, to coup d’etats and even assassinations. The most striking case was that of Thomas Sankara, a Burkinabe military officer and Marxist revolutionary and pan-Africanist, who came to power in Burkina Faso in 1983 and who wanted French troops out of his country. Sankara, an iconic figure in Africa now, was assassinated by one of his own associates, who was allegedly working on behalf of imperialism, and who then succeeded him as president of the country. An organisation ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States) was formed, dominated by pro-western leaders of West Africa, which took on the responsibility of preserving the status quo and hence furthering the cause of imperialism.

Of late however there has been a popular anti-imperialist upsurge in several countries of Francophone Africa. In Guinea, Mali, Chad and Burkina Faso, new anti-imperialist governments have come to power in the last couple of years that want French troops out of their countries; and in Mali they have even succeeded in getting French troops out.

Niger is the latest country to join this group. The governments of this group of countries have come to power through coup d’etats; and in the case of Niger the coup was against an elected government. This fact has enabled imperialist countries to debunk such newly-installed governments as “anti-democratic”, though the imperialist countries never once take a similar stance vis-à-vis coup d’etats that install right-wing pro-imperialist regimes.

The irony of this imperialist double-speak was quite evident recently. The new government in Niger came to power through a coup d’etat of the presidential guard, an elite segment of the armed forces against the elected government of President Bazoum which had been pro-west and pro-US even to the point of asking for an increase in the number of French troops stationed in that country. Victoria Nuland, the neo-con deputy secretary of state of the US went to meet one of the coup leaders who had received military training in the US to “persuade” the new Niger government to respect democracy and restore Bazoum to power. The same Victoria Nuland however had been directly responsible for organising the coup in Ukraine in 2014 that had removed Viktor Yanukovich the elected president of that country from power, an event that had unleashed the chain of developments leading to the current tragic war there. Imperialist concern in other words is not really for democracy; it is for the perpetuation of imperialist hegemony.

The argument that upholds elected governments in the Francophone countries may appear unexceptional; but the reality is that many pro-imperialist West African politicians have been amassing huge personal wealth by being in cahoots with the French government and French business interests, allowing the latter to exploit the valuable natural resources of their countries (Niger for instance has rich deposits of uranium which are required by France to generate electricity); with such massive ill-gotten wealth they purchase votes, and aided additionally by rigging, manage to win elections. The “elected” governments in short are not entities that enjoy popular support; they are constituted by corrupt politicians who manipulate elections to keep themselves in power.

On the other hand, segments of the army in many of these countries constitute the real location for revolutionary and patriotic ideas. Not surprisingly, the coup in Niger has been widely welcomed by the local population, the overwhelming majority of whom, even according to western public opinion surveys, want France out of their country.

The corruption associated with the electoral process is most clearly evident in the case of contemporary Nigeria where the elected president, Bola Tinubu, had amassed huge wealth, allegedly by doing money laundering operations on behalf of a group of drug traffickers, whom he had befriended when he was located in the United states (MROnline August 12). Returning to Nigeria he found himself among the richest politicians of that country, and allegedly purchased votes to get himself elected as the country’s president. He is always in close touch with the US embassy in Nigeria, and, after the Niger coup decided to cut off electricity supply from Nigeria to that country in a unilateral imposition of sanctions. In addition, being the current chairman of ECOWAS, he has tried to pit that organisation against the current anti-imperialist regime of Niger. In his capacity as chairman, he has announced that unless the elected former president of Niger is restored to office, ECOWAS would militarily intervene in Niger to bring about his restoration.

Unfortunately for him and fortunately for the anti-imperialist forces in Francophone Africa, the senate of his own country did not approve of any military intervention in Niger. And Guinea, Burkina Faso and Mali have already announced that if there is any military intervention against Niger, then they would also militarily intervene to defend the new government of Niger.

Despite all this, however, ECOWAS has not abandoned its plans of military intervention and there are reports of troops being amassed on Niger’s borders. Francophone Africa therefore is on the verge of war; but if there is war it will be a proxy war being waged by imperialism against countries wishing to carry forward the decolonisation process that had been stalled at its very inception. It is significant that the imperialist countries themselves had briefly considered military intervention against Niger, before abandoning the idea, and letting ECOWAS go ahead with plans of military intervention as their proxy.

Significantly, the new regimes in Francophone Africa are looking to Russia to help them in their struggle against imperialism and often invoke the role that the Soviet Union had played in the third world’s anti-imperialist struggle. The Soviet Union alas no longer exists and Russia is far from being its ideological successor; but it still has credibility because it is defending itself against imperialism in a different theatre of action.

(Peoples Democracy)

https://orinocotribune.com/the-stalled-decolonization/

******

The situation in the African Sahel for August 12 - 22, 2023
August 22, 2023
Rybar

Image

Clashes continue in the region between militants of the local branch of the Islamic State * and the al-Qaeda affiliate * Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin *, as well as government forces.

The greatest problems in the field of internal security remain in the area of ​​the “triple border” , where radicals carry out raids with almost impunity.

In the meantime, negotiations between the ECOWAS delegation and the military government of the Republic of Niger failed . In the event of an armed conflict, Burkina Faso and Mali deployed their military aircraft in a neighboring state.

Mali
In the Mopti region of central Mali, the villages of Yarou , Ijeli and Komokan were attacked by militants, with at least 25 civilians killed and 11 injured. No group has yet claimed responsibility for the attacks.

The Malian army has regained control of the base of the UN Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA) in the village of Ber in the Timbuktu region.

Earlier, the UN mission in Mali said that MINUSMA forces were withdrawn from the base due to tensions in the region in accordance with a UN Security Council resolution .

Jamaat Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin militants attacked a MINUSMA convoy that had abandoned its garrison in Bera . During the shelling, four peacekeepers were injured.

On the same day, terrorists attacked the positions of government troops at the entrance to the city of Timbuktu , and also fired at a checkpoint in the vicinity of the city of Gao . One member of the Malian Armed Forces was killed.

The President of the Republic of Mali, Colonel Assimi Goita, announced a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin .

The topic of discussion was the situation in the Republic of Niger. The leaders of the two countries stressed the importance of resolving the situation in Niger exclusively by peaceful political and diplomatic means.

Burkina Faso
In the city of Ouarga in the province of Kulpelogo, as a result of an attack by radical Islamists on employees of a mobile police detachment, five law enforcement officers were killed and four more were injured.

On the part of the Armed Forces of Burkina Faso, retaliatory actions were taken, during which at least 40 terrorists were neutralized and their equipment was seized.

Defense Minister of Burkina Faso, Colonel Kassoum Coulibaly, announced the readiness of the Republic to leave the West African bloc of ECOWAS and support the Republic of Niger.

In this regard, Mali and Burkina Faso "in accordance with their obligations" deployed their combat aircraft and helicopters in Niger in case of military intervention by ECOWAS.

Authorities in Burkina Faso "in solidarity with their neighbor" have allowed grain exports to Niger, which needs to import at least 600,000 tons this year to avoid a humanitarian crisis.

Niger
At least 17 Niger military personnel were killed and 20 injured in a militant attack near the town of Kutugu in the Tillabéri region. The incident took place near the border with the Republic of Mali.

Colonel Amadou Abdraman , a spokesman for the Niger transitional government , said that previously ousted President Mohamed Bazum would be brought to trial for treason.

In the capital of the Republic of Niger, the city of Niamey , negotiations were held between the ECOWAS delegation and representatives of the military government.

A delegation from the West African bloc of ECOWAS demanded the reinstatement of President Mohamed Bazum, to which the military refused. As a result of the meeting, the parties failed to reach an agreement .

Earlier in ECOWAS, in case the diplomatic efforts failed, they agreed on a “D-day” for possible military intervention. Despite this, the West African bloc does not have sufficient forces for a large-scale military operation .

The head of the transitional government, General Abdurahman Chiani, warned against any foreign interference in his televised address .

The general said that within three years the military would return the state to civilian rule. In turn, ECOWAS considered this schedule unacceptable.

Due to fears of a West African bloc invasion, a private voluntary mobilization initiative was launched in Niger . Thus, thousands of citizens gathered in Niamey , answering the call for the support of the armed forces.

The organizers stated that the military government was not involved in this campaign, although it knew about it. According to them, there are so many people who want to support the army that the census of people had to be suspended.

The United States is developing plans to evacuate key military installations in Niger if this becomes necessary under the new military government of the Republic. This was stated by the commander of the US Air Force, General James Hecker .

Thousands of demonstrations are held in Niamey in support of the military government. Citizens chant anti-war and anti-Western slogans.

People are calling on the countries of the West and ECOWAS to stop their war-mongering activities and stop the sanctions pressure on the Republic.

* Grouping is prohibited in the Russian Federation

https://rybar.ru/obstanovka-v-afrikansk ... 2023-goda/

Google Translator

******

African Union Will Not Back ECOWAS Intervention in Niger
AUGUST 22, 2023

Image

Leaders of the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland, Niger's ruling military junta, at a rally on August 6. Photo: Balima Boureima/Anadolu Agency.

By Pavan Kulkarni – Aug 17, 2023

Niger’s popular military government has been consolidating domestic and regional support. Meanwhile, ECOWAS is beset by disunity and domestic opposition after threatening military intervention to restore the ousted Mohamed Bazoum with the backing of France and US

The African Union (AU) said on Wednesday, August 16, that it will not support the military intervention that the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is planning, with the backing of France and the US, to restore ousted Mohamed Bazoum to Niger’s presidency. Bazoum was deposed in a popularly-welcomed coup on July 26.

10 days after the expiry of the deadline given by ECOWAS to Niger’s military government to restore Bazoum, the sub-regional bloc is beset by internal disagreements and domestic opposition in its member states.

After the ECOWAS heads of states ordered on August 10 “the deployment of the ECOWAS Standby Force” and directed “the Chiefs of Defense Staffs to immediately activate” it, the chiefs were scheduled to meet on August 12 to set the wheels in motion.

However, due to “technical reasons,” the meeting was postponed, initially for an indefinite period. In the meantime, ECOWAS member Cabo Verde refused to support the military intervention, which its president Jose Maria Neves told AFP will only “make the situation worse, turning the region into an explosive zone.”

ECOWAS announced later on Tuesday that its member states’ chiefs of staffs will meet in Ghana’s capital Accra on Thursday and Friday to work out further details of the troop deployment.

Ghanaian MPs oppose deployment of its troops

Ahead of this meeting, an anti-war rally was reported on Monday, August 14, in Ghana’s city of Takoradi. Warning Ghana’s president, Nana Akufo-Addo, against dragging the county into a “proxy geopolitical confrontation,” opposition MPs objected to the deployment of Ghanaian troops as a part of the ECOWAS effort.

“Military deployment will be the straw that breaks the back of the camel of “stability” in many West African countries. It could provoke mutinies, and accelerate, rather than halt, the wave of coups d’etat the region is experiencing,” the Socialist Movement of Ghana (SMG) had earlier warned.

Should Akufo-Addo go on to send Ghanaian troops, the Ghana Union Movement (GUM), the country’s third largest party, will “back a very serious demonstration in the country,” its founder Christian Kwabena Andrews warned on Tuesday.

Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, MP from the largest opposition party National Democratic Congress (NDC) and a Ranking Member of Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee deemed “Akufo-Addo’s refusal to submit his Niger Policy to Parliament” as “most undemocratic.” His statement added, “West African leaders who purport to be lecturing Niger on democracy must be seen leading by example at home.”

With the NDC having the same number of seats in the parliament as the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP), Akufo-Addo may struggle to secure parliamentary approval to deploy Ghanaian troops.

ECOWAS chairperson unable to gain support of his own country’s senate
Nigeria’s senate earlier this month refused to support President Bola Tinubu’s plan to deploy troops. Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and its largest economy, amounting to about 67% of ECOWAS’ GDP. It also has the largest military in the bloc.

The killing of 23 army personnel on August 14 in an ambush by terrorists in Nigeria’s Niger state is another reminder of the pertinence of the senators’ warning that Nigeria’s military “is highly ill-equipped and not prepared to fight any war.”

Under the circumstances, they had argued, “the Federal Government should focus on solving the Boko Haram, banditry, and ESN/IPOB menaces… instead of contemplating going to war in a foreign country.”

Nevertheless, ECOWAS has persisted in threatening military intervention in Niger, even though Tinubu, who is its current chair, is unable to secure the support of his own senate for such an intervention.

Waving flags of Nigeria and Niger together, anti-war protesters, who took to the streets on Saturday in Nigeria’s Kano State on the border with Niger, sloganeered: “Nigeriens are our brothers; Nigeriens are also our family.” They denounced the plans for aggression against their northern neighbor as “a plot by Western forces.”

Image

Senegal and Benin have committed an unspecified number of troops for the ECOWAS invasion. Joining the fray is also Sierra Leone, whose president Julius Bio is facing a crisis of domestic legitimacy after retaining power in June this year in a violent election, the credibility of whose results is widely challenged by domestic observers, the US, UK, France and the EU.

Ivory Coast has committed 850 to 1,100 troops. “This coup d’etat is not acceptable,” maintains its president Alassane Ouattara, who came to power in 2011 with the help of a military offensive backed by US and France against the incumbent to whom Ouattara had officially lost a disputed election.

Liberia, along with Gambia — where the ECOWAS had previously intervened in 2017 — have been sitting on the fence, undecided as yet on whether or not to send troops.

ECOWAS backers, France and US, disagree
Further stultifying the bloc is the fact that strong disagreements are also surfacing between its main backers — Niger’s former colonizer France, which has up to 1,500 troops in the country, and the US, with another 1,100 troops in two bases.

Keener on military action, France is reportedly opposed to the US line of seeking further negotiations, and is unwilling to accept anything less than the reinstatement of its close ally Bazoum.

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a former member of France’s National Assembly and leader of France Unbowed, termed the French backing of ECOWAS’ military action as “irresponsible amateurism.” He insisted that “France must not engage in a military expedition against” the AU’s decision opposing it.

While this fractured coalition against Niger has been wavering after ordering the “deployment of the ECOWAS Standby Force,” Niger has received firm support from Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea. All three were suspended and sanctioned by ECOWAS after similar popularly-supported coups, backed by anti-French mass movements.

Mali and Burkina Faso, whose popular military governments have successfully ordered the French troops out, have declared that their military forces will come to the defense of Niger, treating any attack on it as an attack also on them.

Niger’s military government consolidates domestic support
In the meantime, Niger’s military government, the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP), which ordered the French troops out soon after the coup against Bazoum, has been consolidating support domestically.

While France has refused to withdraw from Niger, arguing that it only recognizes the authority of Bazoum, thousands of Nigeriens protested outside its military base in capital Niamey last week.

On Monday, CNSP announced that Bazoum would be tried for “High Treason” for inviting foreign powers to invade Niger. The following day, Abdoulaye Seydou, leader of the M62 Movement which had been leading the protests demanding the removal of French and other foreign troops from the country, was released from prison.

Bazoum’s regime, which was cracking down on the anti-French movement, had arrested Seydou in January in what Frontline Defenders deemed to be an “arbitrary detention… directly linked to his peaceful and legitimate work in defense of human rights.”

Since the coup against Bazoum, tens of thousands have been taking part in demonstrations and rallies backing the CNSP against France and Bazoum, whom they perceive as the former colonizer’s puppet.

The statement released by the International Peoples’ Assembly (IPA) calling for the “immediate removal of foreign military bases from Niger and other African countries” was signed by organizations across the region such as Parti Comuniste de Benin, Nigerian Union of Allied Health Professionals, Socialist Movement of Ghana, Parti Communiste Révolutionaire de Côte d’Ivoire, Partido Africano para Independência de Guinee e Cabo Verde, Conféderation Libre des Travailleurs de la Mauritanie, Workers Democratic Way, The Collective of Saharawi Human Rights Defenders in Western Sahara, Communist Party of Jordan, Union of Iraqi Trade Unions, Party of Popular Socialist Coalition, Federation of Workers Councils and Unions, Tunisian Workers Party, Palestinian People Party, and the We Can Movement (Mauritania).

(Peoples Dispatch)

https://orinocotribune.com/african-unio ... -in-niger/

*******

Namibia: Canadian Oil Company’s Extraction Pump and Dump Scam Highlights Criminal Resource Extraction
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 22, 2023
Marthad Shingiro Umucyaba

Image
Picture of the Recon Africa drilling site at the Mbambi Village in Kavango basin. No liner, in violation of safety regulations concerning the environment. Courtesy of Rob Parker.

Through interviews with key witnesses, along with documents and cables from key ministries in Canada and Namibia, The Canada Files has discovered the unlawful dealings behind a massive pump and dump scam from a Canadian oil company, Recon Africa. The project had the diplomatic backing of the Canadian government, ostensibly for ‘development’. Yet in reality, it was supported on behalf of a key Liberal ally, Will Adams, the former lobbyist for Recon Africa. The operation was saturated with corruption, political nepotism, and fraud on all levels.

Existing laws in Namibia were ignored outright to allow the project, human impact was shamelessly ignored, and whistleblowers who refused to take bribes were threatened and harrassed to the indifference (and tacit support) of the Canadian and Namibian governments. Even small-time investors in the project were defrauded.

ReconAfrica’s fraudulent Setup

The Canada Files reached out to consumer rights activist and Canadian Rob Parker, who has been active in dealing with the effects of the ReconAfrica project since the drilling began in March 2021. The Canada Files also reached out to Rinaani Musata, a member of the Economic Social Justice Trust (ESJT), and Moronga Amnatenya Thomas, the head of the Okavango Conservancy.

According to Rob Parker, ReconAfrica was originally going to base their act of fraud on shale gas, using a fake media campaign headed by James Stafford. The project was going to be a search for shale gas in the Okavango basin in Botswana and Namibia, using fracking.

However, fracking was declined by the Namibian government, so Recon Africa ‘re-evaluated’ their claim in the region to an ‘estimated’ 120 billion barrels of petroleum, instead of shale gas. Yet the region they obtained the license for was the shallow end of the already explored region, making the possibility of finding any valuable resource in the region virtually nonexistent.

According to Parker and Thomas, Recon Africa obtained a petroleum exploration license to drill using an incomplete Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) on a national holiday. This being Heroes’ Day, August 26th, the day Namibia was founded post-Apartheid.

On national holidays, all government offices, particularly commerce related ones, are supposed to be closed, making the timing rather suspect. Moreover, the Namibian government under the ruling SWAPO party is infamous for corruption scandals and collaborating with NATO’s colonial adventures in the region. All three of the people we interviewed suspected bribery within the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Tourism on that basis.

Moreover, the EIA was also supposed to include the local consultation results, according to Thomas. No license or certificate was supposed to be approved before that consultation occurred, and before it was clear that the people had given their consent. The Kavango basin for which the license was issued, in particular, of the larger Kavango region, was legally under conservation, and was supposed to be protected from any resource extraction under the Nature Conservation Ordinance of 1975.

The ‘Development’

In an interview, Rinaani mentioned that at no point had the promises from primarily Canadian resource extraction investments ever been realized. According to Rinaani, 80 per cent of mining companies in Namibia are foreign owned, and the vast majority of over 22 mining companies within that market are Canadian based.

ReconAfrica shamelessly promised hospitals, accommodation for those that had to leave their homes initially, infrastructure investments, education investments, and regular employment for the affected community of Mbambi village. Except for ‘employment’, none of the promises were even touched upon, according to Rinaani. The ‘employment’ turned out to only last at most two weeks, at 200 Namibian dollars a day ($17 CAD/day). Then the ‘employees’ were fired without notice, in contravention to the Namibia Labour Act. Some wages are still unpaid, according to Thomas.

Rinaani and Parker both suspected this was done to inflate employment numbers and prevent any residents from working there long enough to understand the inner workings of the drilling site. Inner workings including the numerous safety and environmental violations stipulated in the 53-page letter sent to the High Commissioner of Global Affairs Canada in South Africa, including illegal dumping of toxic fluids into the environment, among other things.

The agriculture of the region is also being negatively affected by the drilling. The vibrations are altering the elephants’ migration patterns. As a result, the elephants are now being diverted towards the crops of Mbambi Village, which are now undermining the real and tangible agriculture economy that the village relied upon, according to Rinaani, Parker, and Thomas.

Corruption and Violation of Sovereignty

Despite a 53-page letter sent to the High Commissioner of Global Affairs Canada in South Africa detailing the fraud and environmental damage caused by Recon Africa, the government has refused to admit that the Recon Africa project as a whole is unlawful. Canada’s Ambassador to the UN, Bob Rae, even met with Recon Africa in Namibia to continue to take their misrepresentations and fraudulent actions at face value.

At the time of this writing, ReconAfrica is now 83 million CAD in debt, according to Recon Africa’s own internal audit. ReconAfrica founder Craig Steinke began preparing to sell more than half of his 10 million shares in March 2023 (reporting the sales on July 1), before the stock dropped to the current rate of $1.00 USD per share, which it’s resting at as of this article’s release.

New Democratic Party MP Niki Ashton, due to personal ties with the activists in Namibia, sent a letter requesting that ReconAfrica be removed from the Toronto Stock Exchange, which was denied by the Liberal Government.

The Liberal government’s collusion with the pump and dump scam can be attributed to their association with Will Adams, who lobbied for ReconAfrica from July 2021 until November of 2022. He was acting as chief of staff to the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, from 2011-2013. This ended up being a display of political nepotism at its finest.

Incidentally, Rob Parker and Thomas weren’t just ignored by Canada. Rob Parker, especially, is now forced to anonymize his messages because his emails have been hacked and accessed in locations as far as France. Thomas was also targeted for a smear campaign, and his colleague Max has been arrested repeatedly by the Namibian police acting on behalf of Recon Africa (pg. 12: Letter to High Commissioner).

We reached out to Recon Africa, and here was their response:

Hello M. Umucyaba,

“ReconAfrica is working collaboratively with – and at the invitation of – the national government of Namibia, as well as its regional and traditional authorities, to ensure we comply with relevant laws and regulations throughout all stages of the process.

ReconAfrica has not applied for, does not have the intention to apply for, nor been granted or given, permits to allow ‘fracking’ – a point which ReconAfrica and the government of Namibia have publicly confirmed.

The people of Namibia, through their traditional authorities, elected government, and regulatory agencies, will determine how they manage their national resources.

Regards,

media@reconafrica.com

The response was diplomatic, short, sweet, and vague enough that future ‘commercial endeavors’ weren’t ruled out completely. It reminded me of Rob Parker’s comment when Recon Africa had previously been asked about whether fracking was really no longer an option or not:

“In several public statements since then, they’ve left the door open to fracking. ‘The people of Namibia will decide how best to extract this resource.’(Rob Quoting Recon Africa)…By the ‘Namibian people’ they mean the people they bribed.”

-Rob Parker

The Closing Thoughts of Africans and other Witnesses

The ‘democratic’ country of Namibia is under military occupation from the United States to protect Recon Africa and other primarily Canadian, but largely NATO assets.

It’s important to take the quotes from the people in Namibia directly and indirectly affected by the project, to see how they feel about how well the ‘democratic’ government of Namibia defended their sovereignty and independence, versus the ‘condemned’ military governments in Northern Africa:

“I feel like I’m offended by Recon Africa because as a Namibian, who respects the laws and the regulations of Namibia, seeing someone getting a license or a certificate on a public holiday, whereby it was a Heroes’ Day, which was meant for the heroes who fought for the liberation of this country, really, I’m having a wound that will never be healed because our parents did not fight for oil exploration. We cannot be disgraced by a company getting a license on a public holiday…disrespect from top to bottom…Recon Africa did not respect the laws and regulations of this country.”

– Moronga Amnatenya Thomas, Chairperson of the Okavango Conservancy

“How can this company come here and do whatever they want? So for me it was like, ‘This company comes here, does all these things, but they would never do these same things back in their original countries’. So why should they undermine us, undermine our sovereignty in that kind of way? So that’s why I got involved. It was obviously the first reason why I got involved.”

“It turns out Canadian companies are the worst in terms of the environment and in terms of respecting human rights.”

– Rinaana Musata, chairperson of the Economic Social Justice Trust

Here is the closing dialogue this author had with Rob Parker:

Marthad Shingiro Umucyaba: “All of it comes together. This ends up being a beautiful corruption story. Back and forth with Global Affairs, a politician with high school nostalgia, and pockets being lined quite shamelessly. I’m very happy that this (investigation) can end up being quite a masterpiece in the end.”

Rob Parker: “Yes…it brings it all together. And it ends up where it belongs…the colonial fiction called Canada.”

ATIP referenced

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... xtraction/

Niger: The Vassals of Paris Receive the Order to Attack
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 22, 2023
Mohsen Abdelmoumen

Image
Africans will send soldiers to die [again] for France. D. R.

Contrary to declarations by ECOWAS soldiers that they were not ready for intervention in Niger, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, it turns out that African slaves belonging to this organization have been ordered by their White masters to activate their army and go on the offensive. War is imminent. The West African stooges have thus trampled underfoot the decision of the African Union, which had categorically rejected any armed intervention. The ECOWAS Commissioner for Political Affairs, Peace and Security, Abdel-Fatau Musah, told the BBC that D-Day had been decided and that he was awaiting orders to launch the operation. We would like to ask this colonized man from whom are the orders to come, the stooges in the pay of the West or the West itself?

Niger’s Military Council agreed to receive an ECOWAS delegation on August 19, a meeting attended by Niger’s new Prime Minister Ali Lamine Zeine.

The delegation was even able to meet the deposed President Mohamed Bazoum. ECOWAS persists in demanding Bazoum’s release and reinstatement in his official functions, but the CNSP is holding firm to its position, saying it is ready for dialogue “on condition that this dialogue takes into account Niger’s sovereignty and the aspirations of its people”. Indeed, it is undeniable that the people of Niger support the new government, and tens of thousands of volunteers want to get involved in defending their homeland. More than fifty thousand Nigeriens have signed up to a recruitment campaign, prompting the coordinator of this mobilization to say:

“This is a way of telling ECOWAS, which wants to bring us war, that this war is not the war of the military in power, but rather a war between the people of Niger and themselves.We are ready and we will sacrifice ourselves”.

According to a poll commissioned by the London Economist in August, 79% of Nigeriens polled said they supported the CNSP.

Algeria has offered mediation and is urging all parties to give priority to negotiation “before the irreparable is committed, and before the region is trapped in a spiral of violence whose incalculable consequences no one can foresee”, but ECOWAS, at the behest of its Western masters, maintains its intention to use force.Niger has already deployed its troops on the border with Benin and Nigeria, while Mali and Burkina Faso have sent their fighter planes to Niger, ready to support the country in the event of an attack, and Wagner forces are in place to protect the presidential palace in Niamey and key infrastructure. Indeed, Prigozhin’s IL76 has reportedly made at least six flights to Niger in recent days from various Wagner bases, including Syria, and Russian fighters have been rapidly deployed to strategic locations. From the “gray zone”, Prigozhin published a video on August 21 in which he appealed for volunteers: “Temperature over 50°, everything we like. PMC ‘Wagner’ leads RPD, makes Russia even greater on all continents. And Africa even freer. Justice and happiness for the African peoples. A nightmare for ISIS, al-Qaeda and other gangsters. We hire real heroes. And we continue to fulfill the tasks that have been set, and that we have promised to fulfill”.

Meanwhile, in response to the shortages of food and medicines inflicted on the Niger population by the inhumane blockade put in place by ECOWAS, Burkina Faso has opened a humanitarian corridor where a long line of trucks are transporting hundreds of tons of food and other items to Niger, under the protection of the armed forces of both countries.

In a speech to the nation on August 19, General Tiani declared that the CNSP would not remain in power forever, and that its transition would not exceed 3 years. He also announced the start of a month-long national dialogue to draw up proposals for a new constitution, following in the footsteps of Mali and Burkina Faso whose new forces, immediately after taking power, abolished their countries’ predominantly pro-French constitutions, which recognized the French colonial pact and other colonial-era agreements that had kept these countries in perpetual socio-economic decline.

Nevertheless, General Tiani warned that any attack on Niger would be considered an occupation and would be met with a firm response, asserting that “ECOWAS is preparing to attack Niger by forming an army of occupation with the cooperation of foreign military forces”. And there you have it: “occupation”. Indeed, it is an occupation, with French and American forces already on the ground, ready for action.Despite the desire of the Niger National Council to do without “the services of the French army”, supported by its population who have been demonstrating in front of the Barkhane base in Niamey for several days, French Defense Minister Catherine Colonna has refused to withdraw the Barkhane troops, claiming that only the legitimate Bazoum government can take this decision.

And we learn from Le Monde that the former Niger Minister of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, Hassoumi Massaoudou, acting as interim Prime Minister, signed a document authorizing French military intervention to free President Bazoum a few hours after the coup. In addition, our sources also informed us that France and Israel’s loyal valet, the Ivorian Alassane Ouattara, made a visit to Paris on August 17, during which he discussed with Emmanuel Macron the setting up of a mercenary operation in Niger, in close coordination with the French DGSE, should the ECOWAS forces fail.

These occupying forces have no other aim than to attack Algeria and its army, Niger being merely a pretext. This is the result of the meeting between the French, Israeli, Moroccan and Emirati secret services in Tel Aviv last June. Indeed, Algeria has long been in the sights of its many enemies, not only because of its vast territory and immense wealth, but also because of its refusal to bow down to anyone, its historic ties with Russia and China, and its firm, unwavering stance in favor of the Sahrawi and Palestinian peoples. France has never recovered from being driven out of Algeria, and we can see that the pawns are falling into place on the African chessboard to encircle Algeria with hostile forces.

In the west, the kingdom of Bousbir, in the pay of Israel and France, has been waging an incessant multi-faceted war against us for years, as we have repeatedly mentioned in various articles. What’s more, the Makhzen’s gutter press was delighted to seize on the anti-Algerian statements made by French criminal Nicolas Sarkozy, the gravedigger of Libya, whose recent outburst had nothing to do with chance. Incidentally, Sarkozy is a regular at the torrid nights of Marrakesh with his second wife from the Italian bourgeoisie, Carla Bruni Tedeschi, whose “artistic” talent is limited to flaunting her love life in the media. Obviously, the kingdom of prostitution and paedophilia is bound to attract such characters.

To the east, there is Libya, which owes the chaos it has been plunged into since the fall of Qaddafi to the voracious appetite of Sarkozy, that little stooge of the empire who was able to sweet-talk the Libyan leader by inviting him to Paris to extract money for his 2007 election campaign and sell him arms. With NATO’s support, we saw what happened to Libya. “We came, we saw, he died” laughed the criminal Hillary Clinton, referring to Qaddafi’s death. She didn’t laugh so hard when her ambassador Christopher Stevens was liquidated by jihadists in Benghazi. Since then, Libya has become a war zone for the useful idiots activated by the imperialist powers: Islamist terrorists, “rebels”, armed gangs and militias are happily killing each other, drawing on the Libyan arsenal. Our brave ANP soldiers are on guard day and night at the border to prevent terrorist incursions.

The Chad-Libya border is in turmoil, with Chadian head of state Mahamat Idriss Déby, who proclaimed himself president after the death of his father, moving to the Kouri Bougoudi military base, located on a gold mining site. This region of the Tibesti massif in the Sahara, north of Chad, is the preferred territory for attacks against the Chadian armed forces by the main Chadian rebel movements based in southern neighboring Libya. Not to mention Boko Haram, which roams the region. It seems that an attack was launched on the Kouri Bougoudi military base while the Chadian president was there. There is every reason to believe that the rebel group that carried out the attack was activated by a foreign agency, which enabled France to transfer 700 soldiers to the south of Libya to the Al-Wihg air base. France plans to significantly increase the number of its troops there by sending a thousand men. In the current context of an intervention in Niger by ECOWAS, and given that 1,500 French soldiers are based in Niamey, this addition of troops in Libya is no coincidence either.

That’s almost 3,700 km of borders that need to be guarded by our army. Not to mention the forest fires that are flaring up again in the north, even though the temperature is not excessive. These fires are no accident either. We therefore warn all war-mongers, be they French, African stooges, Moroccans, Zionists, Islamist terrorists or rebels of any kind. The first to dare touch Algeria will be dispatched into the stratosphere, or, in the case of our neighbors to the west, into the Atlantic to serve as fodder for sardines and crabs. Algeria is sacred and untouchable, and its entire people will stand by its army. We will show no mercy to our enemies, and we will set fire to your homes in Paris, Bordeaux, Brussels, Tel Aviv and elsewhere. This is a warning we advise you to heed before it’s too late.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... to-attack/

******

General elections begin in Zimbabwe

Image
Although the polling stations will open for 12 hours, the period will be extended in the event that at the time of its closing there are still voters without having exercised their right. | Photo: EFE
Published 23 August 2023

According to international media, the ballot boxes are available from 07:00 local time (05:00 GMT).

Zimbabwe's polling stations opened this Wednesday for the presidential and parliamentary elections announced last May amid a context tinged with an acute economic crisis.

According to international media, the ballot boxes are available from 07:00 local time (05:00 GMT) for the elections in which the president, Emmerson Mnangagwa, seeks to be re-elected.

Although the polling stations will open for 12 hours, the period will be extended in the event that at the time of its closing there are still voters without having exercised their right. Meanwhile, local sources reported delays in the opening of some centers.


The authorities deployed police officers in the streets of the country in order to guarantee the tranquility of the election day. However, the Defense and Security Forces are on alert for any eventuality.

The 80-year-old president, elected in 2018 after the military coup that overthrew former President Robert Mugabe, is seeking re-election amid the complex economic situation in the African country.


For its part, the opposition Coalition of Citizens for Change (CCC) has lawyer and pastor Nelson Chamisa, 45, as its main proposal.

In addition to the highest positions, which would be defined on October 2 in the event of a ballot, 300 parliamentary seats and around 2,000 positions in local councils will be elected.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/zimbabue ... -0009.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 26, 2023 2:30 pm

The People of Niger Want to Shatter Resignation: The Thirty-Fourth Newsletter (2023)

AUGUST 24, 2023

Image
Leslie Amine (Benin), Swamp, 2022.



Dear friends,

Greetings from the desk of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

In 1958, the poet and trade union leader Abdoulaye Mamani of Zinder (Niger) won an election in his home region against Hamani Diori, one of the founders of the Nigerien Progressive Party. This election result posed a problem for French colonial authorities, who wanted Diori to lead the new Niger. Mamani stood as a candidate for Niger’s left-wing Sawaba party, which was one of the leading forces in the independence movement against France. Sawaba was the party of the talakawa, the ‘commoners’, or the petit peuple (‘little folk’), the party of peasants and workers who wanted Niger to realise their hopes. The word ‘sawaba’ is related to the Hausa word ‘sawki’, meaning to be relieved or to be delivered from misery.

The election result was ultimately annulled, and Mamani decided not to run again because he knew that the die was cast against him. Diori won the re-election and became Niger’s first president in 1960.

Sawaba was banned by authorities in 1959, and Mamani went into exile in Ghana, Mali, and then Algeria. ‘Let us shatter resignation’, he wrote in his poem Espoir (‘Hope’). Mamani came home following Niger’s return to democracy in 1991. In 1993, Niger held its first multi-party election since 1960. The recently re-founded Sawaba won only two seats. That same year, Mamani died in a car accident. The hope of a generation that wanted to break free from France’s neocolonial grip on the country is expressed in Mamani’s stunning line let us shatter resignation.

Image
Yancouba Badji (Niger), Départ pour la route clandestine d’Agadez (Niger) vers la Libye (‘Departure for the Clandestine Route From Agadez (Niger) to Libya’), n.d.

Niger is at the centre of Africa’s Sahel, the region at the south of the Sahara Desert. Most countries of the Sahel had been under French rule for almost a century before they emerged from direct colonialism in 1960, only to slip into a neocolonial structure that largely remains in place today. Around the time when Mamani returned home from Algeria, Alpha Oumar Konaré, a Marxist and former student leader, won the presidency in Mali. Like Niger, Mali was burdened with criminal debt ($3 billion), much of it driven up during military rule. Sixty percent of Mali’s fiscal receipts went toward debt servicing, meaning that Konaré had no chance to build an alternative agenda. When Konaré asked the United States to help Mali with this permanent debt crisis, George Moose, the US assistant secretary of state for African affairs during President Bill Clinton’s administration, replied by saying ‘virtue is its own reward’. In other words, Mali had to pay the debt. Konaré left office in 2002 bewildered. The entire Sahel was submerged in unpayable debt while multinational corporations reaped profits from its precious raw materials.

Each time the people of the Sahel rise, they have been struck down. This was the fate of Mali’s President Modibo Keïta, overthrown and jailed until his death in 1977, and the great president of Burkina Faso Thomas Sankara, assassinated in 1987. It is the sentence that has been levied against the people of the entire region. Now, Niger is once again moving in a direction that France and other Western countries do not like. They want neighbouring African countries to send in their militaries to bring ‘order’ to Niger. To explain what is happening in Niger and across the Sahel region, Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research and the International Peoples’ Assembly present red alert no. 17, No Military Intervention against Niger, which makes up the remainder of this newsletter and can be downloaded here.

Image

Why is there an increase in anti-French and anti-Western feeling in the Sahel?

From the mid-nineteenth century, French colonialism has galloped across North, West, and Central Africa. By 1960, France controlled almost five million square kilometres (eight times the size of France itself) in West Africa alone. Though national liberation movements from Senegal to Chad won independence from France that year, the French government maintained financial and monetary control through the African Financial Community or CFA (formerly the colonial French Community of Africa), maintaining the French CFA franc currency in the former West African colonies and forcing the newly independent countries to keep at least half of their foreign exchange reserves in the Banque de France. Sovereignty was not only restricted by these monetary chains: when new projects emerged in the area, they were met by French intervention (spectacularly with the assassination of Burkina Faso’s Thomas Sankara in 1987). France maintained the neocolonial structures that have allowed French companies to leech the natural resources of the region (such as the uranium from Niger, which powers a third of French lightbulbs) and have forced these countries to crush their hopes through an International Monetary Fund-driven debt-austerity agenda.

The simmering resentment against France escalated after the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) destroyed Libya in 2011 and exported instability across Africa’s Sahel region. A combination of secessionist groups, trans-Saharan smugglers, and al-Qaeda offshoots joined together and marched south of the Sahara to capture nearly two-thirds of Mali, large parts of Burkina Faso, and sections of Niger. French military intervention in the Sahel through Operation Barkhane (2013) and through the creation of the neocolonial G-5 Sahel Project led to an increase in violence by French troops, including against civilians. The IMF debt-austerity project, the Western wars in West Asia, and the destruction of Libya led to a rise in migration across the region. Rather than tackle the roots of the migration, Europe tried to build its southern border in the Sahel through military and foreign policy measures, including by exporting illegal surveillance technologies to the neocolonial governments in this belt of Africa. The cry ‘La France, dégage!’ (‘France, get out!’) defines the attitude of mass unrest in the region against the neocolonial structures that try to strangle the Sahel.

Image
Wilfried Balima (Burkina Faso), Les trois camarades (‘The Three Comrades’), 2018.

Why are there so many coups in the Sahel?

Over the course of the past thirty years, politics in the Sahel countries have seriously desiccated. Many parties with a history that traces back to the national liberation movements and even the socialist movements (such as Niger’s Parti Nigérien pour la Démocratie et le Socialisme-Tarayya) have collapsed into being representatives of their elites, who, in turn, are conduits of a Western agenda. The entry of the al-Qaeda-smuggler forces gave the local elites and the West the justification to further squeeze the political environment, reducing already limited trade union freedoms and excising the left from the ranks of established political parties. The issue is not so much that the leaders of the mainstream political parties are ardently right-wing or centre-right, but that whatever their orientation, they have no real independence from the will of Paris and Washington. They have become – to use a word often voiced on the ground – ‘stooges’ of the West.

Absent any reliable political or democratic instruments, the discarded rural and petty-bourgeois sections of the Sahel countries turn to their urbanised children in the armed forces for leadership. People like Burkina Faso’s Captain Ibrahim Traoré (born in 1988), who was raised in the rural province of Mouhoun and studied geology in Ouagadougou, and Mali’s Colonel Assimi Goïta (born in 1983), who comes from the cattle market town and military redoubt of Kati, represent these broad class fractions. Their communities have been utterly marginalised by the hard austerity programmes of the IMF, the theft of their resources by Western multinationals, and the payments for Western military garrisons in the country. Discarded with no real political platform to speak for them, large sections of the country have rallied behind the patriotic intentions of these young military men, who have themselves been pushed by mass movements – such as trade unions and peasant organisations – in their countries. That is why the coup in Niger is being defended in mass rallies from the capital city of Niamey to the small, remote towns that border Libya. These young leaders do not come to power with a well-worked agenda. However, they have a level of admiration for people like Thomas Sankara: Captain Ibrahim Traoré of Burkina Faso, for instance, sports a red beret like Sankara, speaks with Sankara’s left-wing frankness, and even mimics Sankara’s diction.

Image
Pathy Tshindele (Democratic Republic of Congo), Sans Titre (‘Untitled’) from the series Power, 2016.

Will there be a pro-Western military intervention to remove the government of Niger?
Condemnations of the coup in Niger came quickly from the West (particularly France). The new government of Niger, led by a civilian (former finance minister Ali Mahaman Lamine Zeine), told French troops to leave the country and decided to cut uranium exports to France. Neither France nor the United States – which has built the largest drone base in the world in Agadez (Niger) – are keen to directly intervene with their own military forces. In 2021, France and the United States protected their private companies, TotalEnergies and ExxonMobil, in Mozambique by asking the Rwandan army to intervene militarily. In Niger, the West first wanted the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to invade on their behalf, but mass unrest in the ECOWAS member states, including condemnations from trade unions and people’s organisations, stayed the hands of the regional organisation’s ‘peacekeeping forces’. On 19 August of this year, ECOWAS sent a delegation to meet with Niger’s deposed president and with the new government. It has kept its troops on stand-by, warning that it has chosen an undisclosed ‘D-day’ for a military intervention.

The African Union, which had initially condemned the coup and suspended Niger from all union activity, recently stated that a military intervention should not take place. This statement has not stopped rumours from flying about, such as that Ghana might send its troops into Niger (despite the Presbyterian Church of Ghana’s warning not to intervene and the trade unions’ condemnation of a potential invasion). Neighbouring countries have closed their borders with Niger.

Meanwhile, the governments of Burkina Faso and Mali, which have sent troops to Niger, have said that any military intervention against the government of Niger will be taken as an invasion of their own countries. There is a serious conversation afoot about the creation of a new federation in the Sahel that includes Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali, and Niger, which have a combined population of over 85 million. Rumblings amongst the populations from Senegal to Chad suggest that these might not be the last coups in this important belt of the African continent. The growth of platforms such as the West African Peoples Organisation is key to the political advancement in the region.

Image
Seynihimap (Niger), Untitled, 2006.

On 11 August, Philippe Toyo Noudjènoumè, the general secretary of the Communist Party of Benin, wrote a letter to the president of his country and asked a precise and simple question: whose interests have driven Benin to go to war with Niger to starve its ‘sister’ population? ‘You want to commit the people of Benin to go suffocate the people of Niger for the strategic interests of France’, he continued; ‘I demand that… you refuse to involve our country in any aggressive operation against the sister population of Niger… [and] listen to the voice of our people… for peace, harmony, and the development of the African people’. This is the mood in the region: a boldness to confront the neocolonial structures that have prevented hope. The people want to shatter resignation.

Warmly,

Vijay

https://thetricontinental.org/newslette ... ervention/

*************

Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger at the Forefront of the African Revolution
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 24, 2023
Gerald A. Perreira

Image
Niamey, Niger, August 19, 2023: Thousands of young people queue to register to volunteer to defend their country as part of a volunteer initiative. General Abdourahmane Tchiani, head of the Presidential Guards Unit, has repeatedly warned ECOWAS and unnamed Western nations against stepping in. “We once again reiterate to ECOWAS or any other adventurer our firm determination to defend our fatherland”.

“You cannot carry out fundamental change without a certain amount of madness. In this case, it comes from nonconformity, the courage to turn your back on the old formulas, the courage to invent the future. It took the madmen of yesterday for us to be able to act with extreme clarity today. I want to be one of those madmen. We must dare to invent the future”.

– Thomas Sankara


History is a great teacher. If we do not learn from it, we are doomed to repeat mistakes made. Early post-colonial African leaders such as Kwame Nkrumah, Sekou Toure, Modibo Keita and Marien Ngouabi spoke of economic independence and the ongoing struggle for true independence. Well aware of the trap of bogus independence, what Walter Rodney referred to as “brief- case independence”, or what I refer to as “flag-and-anthem independence”, these leaders mobilised and organised their people for the completion of their respective national liberation struggles. However, Western imperialism and its stooges, or “running dogs of imperialism”, as the Chinese revolutionary leader, Mao Zedong called them, either overthrew or assassinated these visionaries. Like so many conquerors throughout history, the imperialists enlisted the support of reactionary regimes and Western assets in the military to achieve their diabolical agenda, that is to keep Africa in a state of permanent dependence and servitude, so they could continue their rape and plunder of the continent.

Frantz Fanon’s observation in his seminal work, ‘Towards the African Revolution’ remains as relevant today as it was when it was first published in 1964. Fanon observed that “the great success of the enemies of Africa is to have compromised the African themselves. It is true that these Africans were directly interested in the murder of Lumumba, Chiefs of puppet governments, in the midst of a puppet independence, facing day after day the wholesale opposition of their peoples, it did not take them long to convince themselves that the real independence of the Congo would put them personally in danger”.

Fast forward to 2023, and as if to confirm his status as a compromised African, ECOWAS Chairman, Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu, is expressing his concern that the emerging trend of coups in West Africa had reached “alarming levels”. Of course, alarming for him as he wonders if he will be the next neo-colonial leader to be swept aside.

As a multipolar world emerges, all over Africa the people are rising up and challenging decades of neocolonial rule, exploitation and fake independence, favouring relations with Russia and China over the US and West Europe. Regardless of what takes place at the political level, it is when the masses rise up that real and meaningful transformation occurs. It is the masses who make history. They are just waiting for the moment, for the tipping point and the moment is here.

In Africa, here in the Caribbean and South America, and throughout the Global South, people at the grassroots are often clearer about what is taking place globally than many who are located in the ivory towers of academia, who so often become confused. In the poorest areas of Guyana, people who have never travelled far from their area or had access to books, or even in some cases internet, are very clear about why Muammar Qaddafi was killed, while we had the globally renowned Guyanese economist and dependency theorist, Clive Thomas, regurgitating the imperialist narrative “Qaddafi must go!” For the masses, knowledge is not gleaned from books and other people’s stories and therefore it is not disembodied. Knowledge devoid of an experiential dimension becomes an abstraction and this precludes an authentic understanding of the immense pain suffered by the peoples of the Global South, and the devastating impact that the injustice we experience has on every aspect of our lives, including whether we and our loved ones even get to live.

Thus, the only people who truly understand the suffering that inflicts millions on this earth every day are the sufferers themselves. As we say in Guyana, “who feels it, knows it”. Those who have been forced to reckon with it, and to fight it themselves, are the ones who will eventually make the change. These are the people who filled the stadium on August 7th to support the revolutionaries of Niger as they closed Niger’s airspace and refused to surrender. These are the people who are signing up in their thousands to defend Niger as I write this article. These are the people in Nigeria and Ghana who oppose their country’s proposed military intervention in Niger because they understand all too clearly that this is a proxy war hatched by the imperialists, especially the US and France. These are the ones in Haiti, who understand and support Jimmy Chérizier, while Haitian activists residing in the US and France and commenting from their ivory towers are falling for the Western narrative which insists on criminalizing those from the Haitian streets who have become conscientized, and now, instead of fighting each other, are fighting their oppressors.

“When the people stand up, imperialism trembles”.

– Thomas Sankara


The political heirs of the traitors who stood in the way of the post-colonial revolutionary African leaders are now plotting and planning ways to thwart and kill this new generation of African revolutionary leaders, Ibrahim Traore of Burkina Faso, Assimi Goita of Mali, and Abdourahmane Tiani of Niger, all in the name of ‘democracy’ – liberal democracy, a Western colonial imposition, an illusion of democracy, a trap that has left the African continent in chaos, persistent poverty and chronic dependency – the hallmarks of the neo-colonial arrangement. It is the chains of this enslavement that the revolutionary coup leaders in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger are determined to break. The same chains that Imran Khan is determined to break in Pakistan.
Image
General Abdourahamane Tchiani, Niger
Image
Captain Ibrahim Traoré, Burkina Faso
Image
Colonel Assimi Goita, Mali

“Imperialism is a system of exploitation that occurs not only in the brutal form of those who come with guns to conquer territory. Imperialism often occurs in more subtle forms, a loan, food aid, blackmail. We are fighting this system that allows a handful of men on earth to rule all of humanity”.

– Thomas Sankara


In the words of Kwame Nkrumah: “Neo-colonialism is not a sign of imperialism’s strength but rather of its last hideous gasp”. The Empire knows that it has come to the end of its reign, even if they refuse to admit it openly. The power and influence of the Empire is fading faster than could have ever been imagined even a year ago, it is indeed taking its last hideous gasp. Although in the open, the US and West Europe are still strutting on the world stage with their usual arrogance and bravado, behind closed doors they are in panic mode.

This new set of compromised Africans, under the umbrella of ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States), continue to push for a military intervention in Niger, backed of course by France and the US, but as I write, are still retreating from making that fatal mistake as they realize it would be doomed to failure. The Western Corporate media continues to bleat about restoring ‘democracy’ to Niger, despite the fact that the coup leaders have the overwhelming support of the people – isn’t that democracy? BBC repeats the same thing over and over, that the US and EU are committed to finding a diplomatic solution to Niger’s “political turmoil”, despite the fact that there is no turmoil as the people of Niger express their overwhelming support for the coup. It is the imperialists that are in turmoil as they realize the extent of the support the coup leaders and Russia have, and the extent of the hatred that is being directed towards them.

Image
The people make history – coup supporters in the streets of Niger, “Down with France, Long Live Putin”

ECOWAS is a neo-colonial body that colludes with the imperialists to keep the existing political and economic arrangement intact. It’s the Black face of White supremacy. Obviously, the coup leaders of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger are well aware of this. All three countries are members of ECOWAS. However, unlike the pro-Western puppets they removed, these revolutionaries are determined to move beyond sham independence and bogus liberal democracy. Those useless neo-colonial States like Nigeria should pay attention to the suffering of their people, rather than talking about invasion. Where were these “running dogs of imperialism” when NATO was bombing Libya into dust. Truth be told, some of these cowards, who call themselves African leaders went along with the imposed decision to destroy Libya. The good news is that it is only a matter of time before they are swept away by the rising tide of the African Revolution.

Why did the ECOWAS proposed invasion, backed of course by the French and the US, not eventuate when the first deadline they imposed on Niger expired? The reason is that they realized then, and are realizing even more so now, that they would not only have to reckon with the military but also the people of Niger who have already had a taste of the dignity that comes with true independence and real sovereignty. In addition, these compromised Africans are afraid that their shameless and traitorous behaviour will be even further exposed than it already is, and that this will cause greater unrest in their own countries.

The Niger coup leaders took the courageous and imperative step of not only kicking out their French neo-colonial masters but have threatened sanctions, withholding the supply of precious raw materials such as gold and uranium. This has sent shock waves throughout the imperialist world. The withholding of uranium is especially terrifying for the French government since uranium from Niger in part powers French nuclear power plants. The French State is the major shareholder in the multi-national mining company Orano (formerly known as Areva), that has been mining uranium in Niger for almost 50 years. According to the World Nuclear Association (WNA), Niger is the world’s seventh-largest producer of uranium and has Africa’s highest-grade uranium ores. Although Orano has already depleted some mines, they are determined to remain in the country, having set their sights on Niger’s Imouraren mine. Listed as the one of the world’s largest uranium deposits, Orano refer to it on their website as “Imouraren Project, the mine of the future”.

Despite this wealth of resources, Niger remains one of the poorest countries in the world, which tells you everything you need to know about France’s ill-gotten gains. In France, one out of every three light bulbs is lit thanks to Nigerien uranium, while in Niger, nearly 90% of the population has no access to electricity. Is this the democracy they want to restore in Niger?

To operate the fifty-six nuclear reactors in France’s eighteen power plants, an average of approximately 8,000 tons of uranium is required every year. This uranium comes mainly from three countries: Kazakhstan (27%), Niger (20%), and Uzbekistan (19%). Although Niger only accounts for 5% of global production, well behind Kazakhstan (43%), Canada (15%), Namibia (11%), and Australia (10%), and even though France could manage without Niger’s uranium, it is the precedent that Niger is setting that is most alarming for France and the entire Western world. Not since Muammar Qaddafi nationalised Libya’s oil companies in 1973, leading to a global oil supply crisis that resulted in desperate measures including carless days in major Western cities, have the imperialists been so afraid. As Francois Mitterrand boldly admitted in 1957, “Without Africa, France will have no history in the 21st century”.

Africa is the world’s true superpower

As I have written in previous articles, there is nothing that the US and Western Europe fears more than a united Africa that is free and independent, and whose resources can no longer be extracted in an exploitative manner. We must never forget that the Western world’s development was possible as a result of hundreds of years of the free labour of captured and enslaved Africans, and the plunder of African resources since the onset of the colonial project right up to the present day. They know that a united and independent Africa would completely alter the balance of power globally. It is a well-documented fact that if Africa stopped the flow of all raw materials to the Western nations for just one week, these nations would grind to a halt.

In 2007, in Conakry Guinea, Qaddafi made a simple observation to a cheering crowd of thousands: “Whenever I ask people about Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola people immediately say it’s an American or European drink. This is not true. The kola is African. They have taken the cheap raw material from us, they’ve made it into a drink, and they sell it back to us for a high price. We should be producing it ourselves and selling it to them.”

This is exactly the point that the revolutionary leader, Ibrahim Traoré is making as he implements projects to increase the manufacturing and processing of raw materials in Burkina Faso. This is of course a fundamental step in the struggle to free any country from persistent poverty and dependence. You can only achieve economic freedom and prosperity for your people when you halt the export of raw materials and start to produce the final product locally.

At this critical juncture in history, Africa is finally realizing its immense power. These times represent a new opportunity because global events are transforming the balance of power and China and Russia are backing Africa’s attempt to take its rightful place on the world stage. This is a moment we cannot afford to miss or to be robbed of. Realizing our power is primarily a psychological transition, it is quite simply a matter of liberating ourselves from our mental incarceration. Almost every known natural resource needed to run the contemporary industrial/high tech economies—such as uranium, gold, copper, cobalt, coltan (for cell phones, video games, laptops), platinum, diamonds, bauxite, and especially large reserves of oil are located in Africa. Azania (South Africa) alone contains half the world’s gold reserves. Democratic Republic of Congo contains half of the world’s cobalt and 80% of the world’s known coltan reserves. One quarter of the world’s aluminum ore is found in the coastal belt of West Africa and the continent is awash in petroleum reserves.

A defining moment for Africa and Africans all over the world, we are getting a glimpse of the kind of power that Africa possesses. Ibrahim Traore, Assimi Goita and Abdourahmane Tiani embody the ideas of Garvey, Nkrumah, Sankara, Qaddafi and every great African freedom fighter who envisioned an Africa free from the bondage of colonialism, neo-colonialism and imperialism.

We must rally to support them as they face the age-old imperialist arsenal of weapons. The usual all-out campaign to demonise them has already been launched, their entire psych-ops will be based on a sophisticated program of deception. If that fails, which it will, given the current awareness worldwide that the emperor is indeed naked for all to see, the next move will be military intervention, using the neo-colonial satraps amongst us, such as President Tinubu of Nigeria, just as they have done in the past.

Compromised Africans come in many guises. Bola Tinubu is an obvious case, openly working in tandem with the imperialists and therefore easy to spot. However, I have seen many who should know better getting excited over the speeches of African leaders who remain conceptually incarcerated, and therefore also compromised, such as President William Ruto of Kenya. He is a good orator and his speeches are full of promise, much the same as Barak Obama’s speeches were. In fact, the vision of a free and independent Africa articulated recently by President Ruto sounded nothing short of revolutionary. I don’t wish to be a pessimist, but a good talker is one thing and decisive action is another, and sadly, there are so many contradictions with regard to President Ruto that I know he inevitably falls into the first category.

President Ruto is calling for a new financial arrangement but says nothing about dismantling the neo-liberal capitalist arrangement that the present financial model is based on. Why? Because the ideology that his center-right party, the United Democratic Alliance adheres to is neo-liberal capitalism. He wants to have a fair financial arrangement within an unfair arrangement. Totally impossible. He uses the word ‘Afrocentric’ but I’m certain he uses it as a substitute for ‘African’ rather than as an ideological concept. He is calling for betterment for our African homeland within a system that colonised and enslaved our ancestors and is still ravaging Africa to this day. This same system got rid of the leaders I mentioned above and frustrated every attempt they made to bring about a new and just economic and financial order. And it is the defenders and enforcers of this same system that are lining up against the revolutionary leaders in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger. Herein lies the contradiction that renders his speeches nothing more than empty rhetoric.

Time for ‘us’ to put sanctions on ‘them’

It is time for Africa to finally rid itself of the last vestiges of colonialism and neo-colonialism. If we have to stop the flow of strategic resources to the Western capitals until they comply with our demands for self-determination, then so be it. It is time for us to apply sanctions on those Western capitals that refuse to respect our God-given rights. The way in which Western sanctions against Russia have completely backfired, resulting in an economically stronger Russia and an isolated West, now teetering on economic collapse, has shown the world that the pendulum has already swung. Western hegemony is over.

Africa has never been in a better position to finally take its place at the global table as an equal partner and demand prosperity for its people. The Worldwide Pan-African Movement and the African masses are crying out for this – the time is now. Africans everywhere must exert maximum pressure on their leaders to realize this power; we owe this much to all those who have gone before us, who have fought and died to realize this dream. Those African leaders who cannot get on board must be moved out of the way. An ECOWAS invasion of Niger must not be tolerated.

The global shift that is happening before our eyes is not a recent phenomenon, it has been building up for decades. The US and Western Europe have been in panic mode behind closed doors for a very long time. They thought that bombarding the world with anti-Russia and anti-China propaganda would work, but it has failed dismally, and much to their dismay, African youth are taking to the streets in greater and greater numbers waving Russian flags. The experience of the people throughout the Global South, especially in Africa, has of course run contrary to Western propaganda. Having experienced centuries of exploitation and genocidal policies by the West, they have never forgotten the fact that both Russia and China, who never had colonies in Africa or anywhere in the Global South for that matter, assisted them in their struggles to free themselves from Western domination and Apartheid in South Africa.

In an article that appeared in the Financial Times as far back as 2007, authors W. Wallis and G. Dyer, wrote: “Western powers real concern is that African States will opt for Chinese deals to free themselves from the punitive conditions of IMF/ World Bank loans and other forms of financial dependence on Europe and the Unites States. As the second largest source of oil in Africa, Angola is now in such a strong position that it is rejecting IMF loans completely. As one consultant put it, with all their oil revenue, they don’t need the IMF or the World Bank. They can play the Chinese off against the Americans.”

In another article titled, ‘China and USA in New Cold War over Africa’s Oil Riches. Darfur? It’s the Oil, Stupid…’ author William Engdahl points out: “Today China draws an estimated 30% of its crude oil from Africa. That explains an extraordinary series of diplomatic initiatives which have left Washington furious. China is using no-strings-attached dollar credits to gain access to Africa’s vast raw material wealth, leaving Washington’s typical control game via the World Bank and IMF out in the cold. Who needs the painful medicine of the IMF when China gives easy terms and builds roads and schools to boot? What does all this mean for Africa? Quite simply it means that we now have a choice in trading partners, and although all trading partners drive a hard bargain – some are giving better deals than others and in addition, respect our right to self-determination.

Black Power – African Power!

This is the moment to put all our efforts into the realization of Nkrumah and Qaddafi’s grand plan for a United States of Africa. As I write, I am heartened by news that Algeria has refused France’s request to use its airspace for a military operation in Niger. Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune stated that “a military intervention could ignite the whole Sahel region and Algeria will not use force with its neighbours”. Only when we can achieve this level of unity and power, will we be able to take our rightful place in the world. At last, we will be able to engage with the rest of the world on our own terms and in our own interest. Backed by a population of 1 billion people, Africa will then be able to make demands that cannot be ignored.

In 2009, at a meeting of the AU in Addis Ababa, Qaddafi, commenting on West European and US attitudes to Africa, and had this to say: “If they do not want to live with us fairly, then they should know it is our planet and they can go to another planet.”

Fair and just is all we are seeking – only the unfair and unjust have anything to fear.

Imperialism can only be buried in Africa…

In an article in 2011, I invoked as its title Sekou Toure’s bold assertion: that imperialism will be buried in Africa. To Western commentators this might have seemed optimistic, and indeed some commentators asserted that it was not grounded in reality and that we were, if anything, being crushed by imperialism’s might. However, looking at it from a revolutionary Pan-African perspective one simply sees it as inevitable. Imperialism can only be defeated in Africa. Although there is a revolutionary fightback globally, and most notably throughout Central and South America, it is only when Africa is free that imperialism can finally be buried, since it is Africa that fuels the imperialist’s existence and their space age.

The onus is on revolutionary Pan-African organizations/movements, on the continent and in the Diaspora, to provide clear analysis and strategies capable of thwarting the enemies’ plans at every point. We must rid ourselves of the evil scourge of US and West European imperialism, their created, funded and facilitated so-called ‘jihadists’ (aka NATO’s foot soldiers) and the confusion and havoc they are spreading, and their neo-colonial regimes. There is no room or time for indecision leading to inaction. We must bury imperialism in Africa once and for all or we will surely perish.

Following the destruction of the Libyan Jamahiriya and the assassination of Muammar Qaddafi, veteran African freedom fighter and former president of Namibia, Sam Nujoma, was extremely critical of the African Union’s weakness, stating that they “had woefully failed to mobilize militarily to stop the bombing of Libya and that the African Union should have mobilized their forces in order to fight and defend the territorial integrity of Libya”. He offered the following advice: “Africans should talk war – the language best understood by Western countries…The imperialists understand no other words than fighting. We dislodged them from our continent by fighting them. If we did not fight in Namibia or in Zimbabwe or elsewhere, we would not be free today. We must now prepare to fight them again…”Certainly, the courageous revolutionaries of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have heeded his call and are leading the way. We salute them and pledge our support on every front. It was no coincidence that the All African People’s Revolutionary Party (AAPRP) theme for African Liberation Day, 2023, was “Smash Neo-colonialism, African People are Ready for Revolution”.

I end with the immortal words of Kwame Nkrumah:

“We have awakened. We will not sleep anymore. Today, from now on, there is a new African in the world”.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... evolution/

*******

Niger’s Junta Expels French Ambassador

Image
The junta appointed a new government and recently proposed to return the country to civilian rule within 3 years. Aug. 25, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@BombBasticKing

Published 25 August 2023 (14 hours 1 minutes ago)

Nigerien soldiers led by Brigadier General Abdourahamane Tchiani overthrew President Mohamed Bazoum on July 26.


Niger's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation informed on Friday that the country's military government gave French Ambassador Sylvain Itte 48 hours to leave the country.

According to the foreign ministry statement, the decision follows several actions by the French government contrary to Niger's national interests. Among them, the French ambassador's refusal to respond to an invitation to meet with Niger's new foreign minister, the statement said.

For its part, the French Foreign Ministry said Friday night that it would not accept the Niger junta's request, stating that "the military government has no authority to order France to withdraw its envoys."

Nigerien soldiers led by Brigadier General Abdourahamane Tchiani overthrew President Mohamed Bazoum on July 26. In response, 11 members of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) sanctioned Niger and threatened military intervention to restore democratic order.


In early August, the junta declared that it would annul several military cooperation agreements with Paris signed under the ousted president. Niamey's regime has accused France of planning a military intervention in the country to reinstate Bazoum.

The junta appointed a new government and recently proposed to return the country to civilian rule within 3 years. ECOWAS has rejected the proposal and continues to demand the immediate reinstatement of Bazoum.

Neighboring countries, including Guinea, refused to go along with the sanctions, while Mali and Burkina Faso said they would consider any military intervention in Niger an act of war against them. Late on Thursday, the West African country declared that it authorized its two neighbors to come to its defense in the event of an ECOWAS intervention.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Nig ... -0018.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply