Africa

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sun Jul 30, 2023 2:21 pm

Declaration of the Second Russia–Africa Summit
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 29, 2023

Image

We, the Heads of State and Government of the Russian Federation and African States recognized by the United Nations (UN) (hereinafter also referred to as the Russian Federation and African States), and representatives of the African Union and Africa’s leading integration organizations, gathered on 28 July 2023 in Saint Petersburg (Russian Federation) to participate in the Second Russia–Africa Summit,

Reaffirming the principles and objectives enshrined in the Declaration of the First Russia–Africa Summit (Sochi, 24 October 2019), which laid the strategic foundation for our relations in the 21st century,

Building on the historical and time-tested friendly ties between the Russian Federation and African States, mutual respect and trust, traditions of joint struggle for the eradication of colonialism and the establishment of independence of African States,

Welcoming the growing importance of African States and the African Union as the leading continental organization in international affairs, which reflects the increasing global role and influence of Africa as an essential pillar of the multipolar world,

Reaffirming the need to jointly oppose neo-colonialism, imposing conditions and double standards while not allowing these practices to deprive States and peoples of the right to make sovereign choices of their development paths,

Committed to the fundamental principles and purposes of the United Nations Charter, subscribing to safeguarding and upholding international law and emphasizing the need for the adherence thereto by all States,

Confirming the shared responsibility of the Russian Federation and African States for shaping a just and stable world order based on the principles of sovereign equality of States, non-interference in their internal affairs, respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and the right of all peoples to self-determination as provided, inter alia, by UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, as well as the need to preserve national identity and national resources, cultural and civilizational diversity and to protect traditional values,

Recognizing the central role of sovereign States in decision-making, including in the maintenance of international peace and security, while respecting the diversity of value systems of States and nations within multilateral fora,

Welcoming the readiness of the Russian Federation to continue its consistent support for strengthening the national sovereignty of African States as well as all their security dimensions,

Sharing and supporting the aspirations of African States as enshrined in the African Union’s Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted by the UN General Assembly in its Resolution 70/1 of 25 September 2015,

Expressing deep concern over the challenges related to global food security, including the rise in food and fertilizer prices, as well as the disruption of international supply chains, which disproportionately impact the African continent,

Confirming the willingness to reconcile approaches to energy cooperation issues, with a focus on finding pragmatic, efficient, consensual and sustainable solutions to ensure energy security, access to modern and clean energy sources, eradicate energy poverty and overcome energy shortage,

Welcoming the determination of the Russian Federation to continue providing assistance to African States in order to address issues related to the provision of food, fertilizers and energy resources, as well as carry out international development assistance projects,

Opposing aggressive nationalism, neo-Nazism, neo-fascism, Afrophobia, Russophobia, all forms of racism and racial discrimination as well as discrimination based on religion, belief or origin, xenophobia and related intolerance against in particular but not limited to migrants, refugees, asylum-seekers,

Confirming the importance of establishing and developing effective channels for interaction between integration organizations in which the Russian Federation and the African continent participate,

Acting in accordance with the national legislations of the Russian Federation and African States, have agreed as follows:

Mechanism for Dialogue Partnership

1. Strengthen the role of the Russia-Africa Partnership Forum as the cornerstone of Russia-Africa multilateral cooperation that implements the decisions of the Summit.

2. In the period between Summits, hold annual political consultations between the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and the Chairperson of the African Union Commission, as well as between Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and African Statesand the African Union Commission, in addition to the existing format of dialogue with the present, former and future Presidencies of the African Union.

3. Initiate the creation of a permanent top-level Russia-Africa dialogue mechanism to operate within the African Union Multilateral Partnership framework, in order to coordinate efforts against terrorism and extremism, including violent extremism conducive to terrorism, address environmental, food, and information security issues, participate jointly in African Union programmes on developing the architecture of peace, stability and security.

Political and Legal Cooperation

4. Enhance equal and mutually beneficial cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States in order to contribute tо the establishment of a more just, balanced and stable multipolar world order, firmly opposing all types of international confrontation in the African continent.

5. Contribute to further promoting the central coordinating role of the United Nations as the main global multilateral mechanism for aligning the interests of United Nations Member States and their actions to achieve the goals of the UN Charter as well as to ensure respect for the universally recognized principles and norms of international law enshrined therein.

6. Coordinate, within the United Nations Security Council, approaches towards sanctions policies with regard to African States, including with a view to further easing and lifting restrictive measures that are no longer relevant.

7. Work together to counter the use of illegitimate unilateral tools and methods, including the application of coercive measures in circumvention of the United UN Council and their extraterritorial application, as well as the imposition of approaches that harm primarily the most vulnerable and undermine international food and energy security.

8. Cooperate to achieve the UN Security Council reform taking into account the geopolitical realities and the Common African Position based on the 2005 Ezulwini Consensus and Sirte Declaration with a view to strengthening the representation of Africa in the Council and addressing the historical injustice against it.

9. Counter the imposition in international organizations, primarily in the UN, of dividing lines that hinder the effective search for solutions to pressing issues on the UN agenda, including those that affect vital interests of African States.

10. Strengthen coordination between the permanent missions to the United Nations of the Russian Federation and African States, including African non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, to jointly promote common interests.

11. Strengthen cooperation within other international organizations and consider expanding the practice of providing mutual support at elections to their governing bodies and in decision-making on issues of importance for the Russian Federation and African States in accordance with their national interests and international obligations.

12. Contribute to the effectiveness of secretariats of international and regional organizations underlining the importance of avoiding politicization of their activities and work together to ensure that States that host the headquarters of international organizations comply fully with their obligations so that representatives of member states can freely exercise their powers.

13. Help enhance the BRICS–Africa partnership and establish the Collective Security Treaty Organization–African Union dialogue, as well as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization–African Union dialogue.

14. Contribute to completing the decolonization process in Africa and work to ensure compensation for the economic and humanitarian damage inflicted on African States by colonial policies, including the restitution of cultural property displaced in the process of colonial plundering.

15. Work together to counter manifestations of neo-colonial policies that aim to undermine the sovereignty of States, deprive them of the freedom to make their own decisions, and plunder their natural resources.

16. Step up efforts to combat contemporary forms of racism and racial discrimination, as well as discrimination based on religion, belief or origin, including xenophobia and related intolerance, aggressive nationalism, neo-Nazism and neo-fascism, and resolve to cooperate together to achieve the full implementation of the 2001 Durban Declaration and Progamme of Action (DDPA). Emphasize the increasing relevance of joint actions to combat these forms of intolerance in the context of overcoming the consequences of colonialism, slavery, the slave trade, including the trans-Atlantic slave trade, which were recognized an appalling tragedy in the history of humanity. Counter the dehumanization, including in the media environment, of entire nations, the cancel culture with regard to their civilizational heritage, as well as any kind of cultural appropriation, including prohibition of the use of the mother tongue.

17. Adhere to the principles of international law, as reflected in the UN Charter and the Declaration adopted on 24 October 1970 on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the United Nations Charter.

18. Consolidate the efforts of the Russian Federation and African States, which advocate for restoring the universal respect for international law and strengthening its role as the foundation of international relations. Resist attempts to substitute, revise, or arbitrarily interpret the principles of international law.

19. Oppose initiatives and concepts aimed at creating alternatives to international law, work together to promote stable and just international order based on the universally recognized principles and norms of international law enshrined in the UN Charter.

20. Strongly believe that the principle of sovereign equality of States is crucial for the stability of international relations.

21. Uphold all the principles of the UN Charter including its Article 2 and Article 51.

22. Adhere to the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of States and oppose the extraterritorial application by States of their national laws in violation of international law.

23. Use peaceful diplomatic means, such as dialogue, negotiations, consultations, mediation, and good offices, to resolve international disputes and conflicts, settle them on the basis of mutual respect, compromise, and the balance of legitimate interests.

24. Contribute to improving the mechanism for applying international sanctions based on the exclusive competence of the UN Security Council to impose such measures and the need to ensure their effectiveness in maintaining international peace and security and preventing the deterioration of the humanitarian situation.

25. Oppose the application of illegitimate unilateral restrictive measures, including secondary ones, as well as the practice of freezing sovereign foreign exchange reserves. Reaffirm the unacceptability of using political blackmail to bring leaders of third countries to implement such measures or influence the political and economic policies of States.

26. Reaffirm the continued importance for the Russian Federation and the African States of the universally recognized principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, which has provided the legal basis for the decolonization process.

27. Stand in solidarity to eradicate the practice of confrontation in international affairs, and resist discrediting certain States for political reasons, introducing political or economic restrictive measures under the pretext of human rights advocacy, oppose attempts by certain States to use unfounded accusations of human rights violations as an excuse for interfering in internal affairs and disrupting activities of international organizations. Contribute to the non-politicized, equitable, and mutually respectful nature of human rights advocacy and promotion and protection of human rights.

28. Strengthen Russia–Africa inter-parliamentary cooperation and coordinate efforts so that international parliamentary events take decisions and adopt resolutions consistent with the interests of the Russian Federation and African States. Hold regular international Russia-Africa parliamentary conferences that would contribute to establishing a regular dialogue between the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and national parliaments of African States, as well as to developing the cooperation of bilateral friendship groups.

29. Strengthen dialogue between political parties, help the major political forces in the Russian Federation and African States coordinate their positions, including at international and regional fora and conferences, with a view to promoting cooperation between Russia and Africa based on the principles of equality, mutual respect, adherence to international law, independence and sovereignty of States.

30. Strengthen cooperation among regions and municipalities, including expanding sister-city ties. Improve the visibility of such cooperation as an important element that promotes multidimensional cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States.

31. Promote people-to-people contacts by drawing on the potential of constructive non-governmental organizations and various fora, including youth fora.

SecurityCooperation

32. Strengthen cooperation between States to counter new challenges and threats, in particular terrorism, extremism, including violent extremism conducive to terrorism, transnational organized crime, illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors, piracy and armed robbery at sea, based on strict compliance with the generally recognized principles and norms of international law, primarily the UN Charter and relevant UN Security Council resolutions, and taking into account the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.

33. Work consistently to increase the level of trust among States and strengthen global and regional stability based on the principle of equal and indivisible security for all States.

34. Continue close cooperation to resolve and prevent conflicts in Africa. The principle of ”African solutions to African problems“ should continue to serve as the basis for conflict resolution.

35. Facilitate African peace efforts on the continent by strengthening the relevant capacities of African States. Advocate for effective measures to enhance the predictability, reliability, sustainability and flexibility of funding for African peace operations under the auspices of the UN Security Council, particularly through the provision of UN assessed contributions and fully-funded African Union Peace Fund.

36. Make joint efforts to ensure long-term food and energy security of the African continent. Strengthen cooperation in countering unlawful unilateral restrictive measures placing African countries at risk of food and energy shortages.

37. Contribute to strengthening and developing the international political framework for maintaining strategic stability, arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. Collaborate in ensuring the integrity, viability and universalization of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of 12 June 1968, the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction of 10 April 1972, and the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction of 13 January 1993. Counter attempts to erode the existing architecture of international instruments on arms control, nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament.

38. Counter the attempts to employ international arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation instruments for political purposes not associated with the subject matter of these arrangements.

39. Continue to take joint steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to preserve it exclusively for peaceful uses for the benefit of all mankind. In this regard, reaffirm the urgent need for a legally binding multilateral instrument establishing reliable guarantees of non-placement of weapons in outer space and non-use or threat of use of force against outer space objects. Support the efforts aimed at the globalization of the international initiative on the no first placement of weapons of any kind in outer space, and call upon all States to join this political commitment.

40. Join efforts within the UN to build an international information security system in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter. Uphold the central role of States in addressing the information and communication technology (ICT) security issues. Work towards establishing universal legally binding norms in this area. Seek the timely adoption of a comprehensive UN convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal purposes. Jointly support the establishment of an equitable and transparent interstate system of Internet governance, while preserving the sovereign right of States to regulate national segments of the global network. Facilitate efforts to bridge the digital divide.

Trade and Economic Cooperation

41. Encourage further strengthening of trade, economic, and investment cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States. Foster the economic, trade and investment partnership between the Russian Federation and the African Union, as well as the leading African regional organizations – the Arab Maghreb Union, the Southern African Development Community, the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa, the East African Community, the Economic Community of West African States, the Economic Community of Central African States, and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development.

42. Welcome the operationalisation of the African Continental Free Trade Area in order to enhance the market integration, industrialisation and economic development of the African continent by facilitating technology transfer and encouraging investment. In this regard facilitate further cooperation between the Russian Federation and Africa in attracting investment, promoting the development of value chains and boosting mutual capacity to produce and export value added manufactured products.

43. Facilitate equitable access of all States to the benefits of the world economy and the international division of labour, as well as to modern technologies to support equitable and even development.

44. Contribute to sustainable and comprehensive economic growth, and a more representative system of international economic governance to respond effectively to global and regional economic and financial challenges.

45. Oppose any unilateral measures, protectionism and discrimination, and continue efforts aimed at implementing the Sustainable Development Goals to make the global economic system more oriented towards attainment of economic and social rights, including the right to development.

46. Stress the need for inclusive multilateral financial measures that provide relief of the debt burden for low- and middle-income countries.

47. Call for concrete actions to reform the policies and practices of the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to scale up financing for developing countries to assist them in achieving Sustainable Development Goals.

48. Facilitate the restructuring of the global financial architecture to better address the growing developmental needs and reflect the interests and increasing influence of developing countries, as well as to overcome the adverse impact of conditions imposed on them in relation to the full and effective enjoyment of human rights.

49. Welcome membership of the African Union in the G20. Enhance the African representation in the G20.

50. Agree on the need to reform the WTO to ensure an open, transparent, inclusive, and non-discriminatory world trading system while preserving the WTO fundamental principles, including the special and differential treatment for developing and the least developed countries. The reform process should be inclusive, transparent and member-driven.

51. Provide support to Russian and African entrepreneurs in exploring ways of mutually beneficial cooperation.

52. Provide the necessary assistance to efforts to formalize the dialogue between the Eurasian Economic Union and Africa’s regional and other integration structures in order to enhance mutually beneficial cooperation in the field of sustainable economic development, industry, agriculture, trade, digital economy, logistics, business development, and in other matters within the competence of these integration structures.

53. Encourage cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States in the field of trade, industrial development and investment flows facilitation, in particular within the framework of the Third Industrial Development Decade for Africa (2016–2025) proclaimed by the UN General Assembly.

54. Assist the work of bilateral Russian-African intergovernmental commissions, committees on trade and economic, scientific and technical cooperation, and sectoral working groups, encourage the establishment of new partnerships between the Russian Federation and African States.

55. Work together to ensure access to reliable, modern and clean energy sources in order to improve access to energy and eradicate energy poverty and overcome energy shortage with due regard to their obligations under international law.

56. Develop cooperation in the field of energy security, diversification of energy resources and development of domestic energy markets of African States, taking into account the right of each State to formulate its own national policy in this area with due regard to their obligations under international law.

57. Emphasize the importance of enhancing energy security and market stability by strengthening value chains, promoting open, transparent, and competitive markets, ensuring the protection of critical energy infrastructure and condemning terrorist attacks against any critical infrastructure, including energy infrastructure.

58. Promote balanced distribution of risks and responsibilities between energy producers and consumers to support African developing countries, as well as to facilitate a just energy transition and relevant international cooperation.

59. Promote food sovereignty and security for African States, particularly net food importing countries, inter alia, through cooperation aimed at developing Africa’s own sustainable agricultural production, including technology transfer.

Scientific and technical, humanitarian, educational, cultural, sports, health, youth and information cooperation

60. Develop cooperation in the field of education, facilitate participation in joint research projects, organization of scientific conferences and seminars, expansion and deepening of collaboration between educational institutions of the Russian Federation and African States. Promote professional training programmes, academic and student exchanges, as well as the study of the Russian language in African countries and the development of African studies in Russia.

61. Strengthen national health systems and improve their reliability and sustainability in the fight against epidemics, pandemics, and other public health challenges, whilst commending the work of the African Union on pandemic preparedness, responsiveness and resilience through the Africa Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

62. Consider the possibility of cooperation in the field of prevention of and response to natural disasters and epidemics, discuss ways of strengthening cooperation in such areas as promoting socio-economic development, providing humanitarian assistance, combating climate change, drought and desertification, disaster prevention and response, as well as emergency monitoring and forecasting.

63. Respect civilizational and national diversity of the Russian Federation and Africa, emphasize the uniqueness of the traditions and historical heritage of our peoples. Develop cultural dialogue in order to maintain the traditional spirit of friendship and cooperation in Russian-African relations. Strengthen cultural ties as a tool for achieving mutual understanding.

64. Facilitate the holding of cultural and humanitarian events, mutual visits of artists for the purposes of developing creative contacts, exchanging experience, participating in conferences, symposiums and other thematic fora.

65. Develop Russian-African cooperation in the field of preservation, restoration and protection of cultural property.

66. Develop cooperation in the field of sports. Promote exchanges of delegations, athletes, teams, coaches and other specialists in the field of sports training. Jointly oppose the politicization of sports within international organizations and advocate a guaranteed free access for athletes and sports organizations to international sports activities, explore the possibilities of developing new formats of sports cooperation between Russia and African States.

67. Promote cooperation in the field of tourism, dissemination of information on tourism opportunities of the Russian Federation and African States.

68. Establish cooperation between Russian and African youth organizations and promote the organization of thematic events to further strengthen and develop youth cooperation.

69. Develop cooperation in the field of information, including strengthening contacts between national media, providing professional and advanced training for journalists, expanding information exchange, implementing joint media projects, ensuring respect for the rights of journalists and promoting the development of media outlets of compatriots living abroad.

Environmental and Climate Cooperation

70. Welcome the outcomes of the 27th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt,

6–20 November 2022) and step up international efforts to fully implement, on the basis of best available science and Common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR&RC), the provisions of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of 9 May 1992 and its Paris Agreement of 12 December 2015, including ensuring the adaptation and greater resilience of States to the negative effects of climate change, as well as responding to loss and damage. Work on just energy transition pathways, and in line with efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in accordance with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Acknowledge the efforts of African States in this field within the framework of the African Union’s Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want.

71. Step up efforts to combat the effects of climate change in Africa as one of the regions most vulnerable to climate change, transfer relevant low-emission technologies, build the capacity of African States and enhance their ability to improve resilience and adapt to climate change, bearing in mind that financing climate action should not increase the debt of African States or jeopardize their sovereignty.

72. Increase cooperation to prevent the politicization of international environmental and climate action, its use to gain unfair competitive advantage, interfere in internal affairs of States and restrict the sovereignty of States over their natural resources with due regard to their obligations under international law.

73. Recognize the right of each State to choose its own best mechanisms and means for protecting and managing the environment, adapting to climate change and ensuring a just energy transition in line with national circumstances and capacities.

74. Develop cooperation in joint projects on environmental protection and sustainable development, including on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of low-emission energy and support for the development of a circular economy.

Kremlin

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/07/ ... ca-summit/

*******

Russia-Africa Forum Analyzes Urban Infrastructure Development

Image
TV BRICS CEO Janna Tolstikova, July 27, 2023. | Photo: TV BRICS

Published 28 July 2023

Participants discussed the issues of modernisation and improvement of infrastructure and the introduction of innovative approaches⁠

On Thursday, on the margins of the second Russia-Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum in St. Petersburg, a panel session entitled "Infrastructural Development, Innovations and Comfortable Urban Environment" was held.

The session participants discussed the issues of modernisation and improvement of infrastructure, introduction of innovative approaches and technologies. They also considered measures to create a favourable environment for business and attract foreign investors, contributing to the sustainable development of cities in both regions.

Janna Tolstikova, CEO of TV BRICS, spoke about the role of the media network in popularising innovations to create a comfortable urban environment.

"Today, TV BRICS has more than 50 media partners in BRICS, Africa, Eurasia and Latin America. We work with our partners on the principle of information exchange. Thanks to our cooperation with media outlets in Africa, we receive high-quality journalistic information about the state of modern life in these countries. We translate this information into different languages - Russian, Portuguese and Chinese, and place materials in the national media of the "five" countries. The same thing works in reverse. This is how we tell about modern Russia on the media platforms of African countries" Tolstikova said.


"Of course, infrastructural development, innovation and comfortable environment are the topics that we as an international information hub pay special attention, by facilitating the exchange of views and experiences on sustainable development of Russian and African cities," she added.

Janna Tolstikova said that TV BRICS cooperates with the Zimbabwean media, which focuses, among other things, on the issues of national housing construction. Zimbabwe's new housing policy was adopted in 2021, with a focus on providing comfortable, affordable and quality housing for different segments of the population, as well as developing inclusive cities and human settlements and creating smart cities, which fully correlates with the African Union's 2063 Agenda and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which Zimbabwe also supports.

"We are developing smart cities, we have advanced technology and we want to provide people with not just housing but multifunctional housing. We want people to live there comfortably, we want them to be able to work, we want the housing to be in an accessible location. We have a system like the Russian Federation that helps people to improve their housing conditions," said Joy Makumbe, secretary in the Housing Ministry of Zimbabwe.

In his turn, Deputy Minister of Construction, Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation Nikita Stasishin explained the current state of the construction sector in Russia and what experience the Russian Federation is ready to share with Africa:

"On the instructions of the President, an infrastructure menu has been launched. This is a huge amount of money that goes to modernise engineering, transport, utilities and social infrastructure. Our country's team in terms of urbanisation of the building block, comfortable urban environment, smart city and transformation of the housing and utilities sector is working towards one goal - to change the quality of life of our citizens. But in order to change in practice, we must first do a huge amount of work - normative, scientific, and take advantage of the world's best practices in order to make standards."


"At the same time, we have a huge scientific base with technical solutions for the development of agglomeration of cities with millions of inhabitants, as well as single-industry towns and small cities. This is something we could share with African countries," he noted.

Yuri Grishan, the Mayor of Magadan, told about the role of public-private partnership in the development of the city infrastructure:

"Thanks to "DOM.RF" funding, we have conducted a lot of research on civil society, it helped us attract a lot of investors to Magadan. In addition to the fact that we receive state funding from various sources and banking structures, we have 14 concession agreements being implemented on the territory of the city of Magadan. Among them are infrastructure projects, schools, kindergartens, sports complexes and so on. This has become possible due to the fact that investors understand what will happen on this territory and that the money they invest, they invest with benefit. We want to create the same conditions as in tourist cities in Russia."

"In Tanzania, the same as in Magadan, the gold is mined and for many years we have been supplying there the washing equipment, because the method of gold mining is the same. We are ready to renew the contacts that we had in the field of construction as well," added the mayor of the Magadan city.

Tafadzwa Muguti, Commissioner of the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Zimbabwe for the Development of Harare Province, noted the peculiarities of the province in terms of transport infrastructure development and spoke about the prospects for cooperation with Russia in this area:

"One of the opportunities to improve transport infrastructure is to intensify partnership relations with the Russian Federation. Thanks to cooperation with Russian cities we could create new master plans for the development of municipalities".

The panel discussion gave the experts an opportunity to share best practices, highlight modern requirements for infrastructure development and consider innovative approaches that can make cities more convenient and environmentally sustainable. The second Russia-Africa Forum is taking place in St. Petersburg on 27-28 July.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0018.html

******

Niger became a hostage of the anti-Russian policy of the West
July 29, 20:08

Image

Niger became a hostage of the anti-Russian policy of the West

The army of Niger went over to the side of the rebels, and President Mohamed Bazum had little chance of retaining power. This is a big blow for Paris, since the supply of uranium ore from these places is of critical importance to it. It was because of France that Niger went against Russia. Because of her, he is so unhappy.

The President of the Republic of Niger, Mohamed Bazum, could now admire the Palace Square in St. Petersburg, but instead he was taken hostage by armed rebels and removed from the leadership of the country. And he can thank official Paris for this, since Niger refused to participate in the Russia-Africa summit under pressure from France, its permanent partner, or, to put it better, the overseer.

They have had an unhealthy relationship since the end of the 19th century, when the French decided to conquer the Lake Chad basin and sent there the so-called Central African Expedition under the command of Captain Paul Voulet. As a method of colonization, he chose robbery and massacres - atrocities of such a level that a scandal broke out in Paris, and the thug was rushed to be fired. Voule shot the messenger with the order to remove him, mutinied with the intention of becoming the head of a new African empire, but was eventually killed by the Senegalese in the French service from among the expedition members.

Shortly before this, Voule had ordered the execution of 150 women and children in retaliation for the deaths of two soldiers. This nightmarish incident, among many others, explains the continued anti-colonial sentiment in Niger. This piece was not easy for the French, but they achieved their goal - and they still have not let it out of their teeth.

When it became bad manners to have colonies in the world, President Charles de Gaulle decided to make them an autonomy within France. The predominantly illiterate population of Niger allegedly voted for this in a referendum, after which supporters of independence were expelled from there, but only two years later, in 1960, independence was nevertheless proclaimed - autonomy seemed to be not enough for local leaders.

The new state was headed by Amani Diori, a former member of the French parliament from among the supporters of autonomy. He quickly established an authoritarian regime and tied his homeland with allied treaties with Paris. The income from French uranium mining was enough for the elite, the rest of the population lived in impenetrable poverty, and the Diori regime, carried away mainly by foreign policy, controlled for the most part only the capital and its environs - other territories existed as subsistence farming under the yoke of local leaders.

In 1974, the regime fell, and Niger embarked on a planid widespread in Africa - from one military coup to another. In almost 65 years of formal independence, there have been seven constitutions and only one peaceful transfer of power from president to president - that same Mohamed Bazum in April 2021.

But even this "historical record" at the last moment was almost covered with a copper basin: another, but unsuccessful attempt at a military coup took place two days before Bazum's inauguration.

Such an intense struggle for power does not go in vain: ranking fifth in the world in uranium mining, Niger is one of the least developed countries in the world, and in some years it set a global anti-record in the so-called Human Development Index. The reason is not only in local poverty, but also in endemic illiteracy.

This situation is convenient for the French, who hooked the authorities of Niger (all authorities, in turn) on their subsidies and technologies. The country's only wealth is uranium, and extracting profit from it is inaccessible to the local economy due to underdevelopment. So the French who speak the same (French) language with the elite are monopolists there, who can open any door with their foot.

If the people of Niger are less busy with everyday survival, they will finally be able to master reading and question the fairness of the distribution of wealth in the country. And also about why everything is still commanded by white people, whose ancestors carried out ethnic cleansing in these places.

Niger's dependence on Paris is also strong because it is mutual. The energy basis of France is not gas, as in Germany, but a peaceful atom. Niger gives the French up to 40% of the required uranium. And besides, he sheltered a French military group expelled from neighboring Mali and Burkina Faso.

There, too, life is from coup to coup, and at this historical stage, the new authorities decided to get rid of French influence and unambiguously showed the colonialists the door.

It is believed that the textbook Wagner PMC, which later occupied the French barracks, took part in this. The French media fantasize about the participation of Wagner in the Nigerian coup, too, which in their case resembles paranoia, although we have to admit that the founder of this PMC, Yevgeny Prigozhin, knows how to surprise.

Be that as it may, in fact, many expect from Niger that he will now go over to the anti-French Fronde, and that he will begin to take invitations to Russian summits more seriously. After all, he really has something to hate France for.

But it is unfair to lay the blame for the country's plight on the French alone. The constant struggle for power and resources in Niger is provoked by many things, up to the ethnic picture on the ground.

Slightly more than half of the population belong to the Hausa people. However, the Djerma are considered the state-forming people: they are less than 20%, but they are the absolute majority in the capital, the city of Niamey, and its environs. The administrative center of the country was subordinate to President Diori even during the decline of his power, also because he is also a local germa.

To the north live nomads - the Tuareg, who regularly raise uprisings, as well as the Arabs. They are less than 2%, but their number includes the now overthrown Bazum. That is, the president of the country is a stronghold of French influence in Africa, the black majority of which was persecuted on a racial basis, white by local standards. Such is BLM.

The forecast for the future of Bazum is quite unambiguous - he will not be president. The day that for him and his French friends was supposed to be the day of the boycott of the Russia-Africa summit, became for Niger the day of the change of power. If on the first day there was still a theoretical scenario according to which the army would recapture the president from the rebels from among his personal guards, then on Thursday the military command announced that it would join the junta in order to “prevent bloodshed.”

It is more difficult with the future of Niger as a whole. Despite all the local storms, the French usually managed to keep this territory under their control, since the cost of losing for them is high - much higher than the geopolitical defeats in Burkina Faso or Mali, for which Emmanuel Macron blames Russia.

However, this is Macron's self-defense - to blame Russia. His active and inactive participation in the collapse of French influence in Africa is much more significant. With such a "talented" leadership, Niger can also be lost.

Perhaps this is just as inevitable a loss as the loss of Algeria, reflected back by General de Gaulle (the pride of the French empire is now one of the most pro-Russian countries in Africa, and openly pro-Russian at that). Because France is “no longer the same”, but before that, too, was a damned bastard.

When Paul Voulet united the French colonies in West Africa with fire and sword, one of the tribes that challenged him was the Aznu tribe, led by Queen Sarraunia. The locals considered her a witch.

The people of Sarraunia lost the battle imposed on the invaders rather ingloriously. Having fled, the queen of the French must have cursed, otherwise what a witch she is. The locals know better - to believe in it or not, but a political marriage with Paris cannot be happy - a hundred and thirty years of guarantee.

(c) D. Bavyrin

https://www.discred.ru/2023/07/28/glava ... ta-rossii/ - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8529631.html

Google Translator

******

General Abdourahamane Tchiani Declared New Niger’s President

Image
General Abdourahamane Tchiani, proclaimed head of the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland. Jul. 28, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@Halbeeg_News
Published 28 July 2023

A group of soldiers of the Presidential Guard announced late on July 26 to have overthrown President Mohamed Bazoum.

The head of Niger's Presidential Guard, General Abdourahamane Tchiani, has proclaimed himself the new president of Niger on Friday, according to state television.

Tchiani appeared on the country's state-run Tele Sahel channel, declaring himself head of the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland, the country's highest body of authority.

This comes after a group of soldiers belonging to the Presidential Guard announced late on July 26 to have overthrown President Mohamed Bazoum. They announced the closure of the national borders, the establishment of a curfew, the suspension of the Constitution and the banning of political parties.

The coup d'état against Bazoum is in response to the "continued deterioration of the security situation and poor economic and social governance," said Major Colonel Amadou Abdramane.


My dear compatriots, receive my first message to the nation as President of CNSP and Head of State of Niger. We must all fight together to save our beloved homeland. Général Abdourahmane Tchiani.

According to Tchiani, who led the presidential guard since 2011, "the harsh reality of insecurity in Niger, experienced by our defense forces and working populations, with its toll of deaths, displacements, humiliations and frustrations, reminds us daily of this stark reality."

The ringleaders of the coup issued the five-article "Order 2023-01 of July 28," including the suspension of the Constitution of November 25, 2010, and the dissolution of its institutions.

Bazoum was held at the government palace by the Presidential Guard as part of the coup actions. He was elected in Niger's first democratic transition of power in 2021.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Gen ... -0027.html

******

Russia-Africa Summit
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 07/30/2023

Image

The Russia-Africa summit with which Moscow has sought to stage the normality despite the war. Of the continental countries, only four have been absent: Niger, immersed in a coup at the moment, Botswana, Kenya and Lesotho. In the same way as with Xi Jinping's visit, which did not entail the signing of any major agreement but did confirm the unaltered continuation of a priority relationship, on this occasion Russia also had a political objective. short-term losses,dissidences in the official position of Brussels in countries like Bulgaria or even in others apparently less likely like Croatia -, Moscow has been forced to look at a much broader map of the world than the one to which it had become accustomed in recent decades.

In economic terms, Russia has so far maintained a part of its direct economic relations with the countries of the European Union, which have not completely abandoned the direct purchase of products such as gas, especially liquefied gas, from Moscow. However, Russia is aware that European countries are ready to look for alternatives to Russian raw materials even at the cost of higher prices. Hence, Moscow has turned to Asia as a priority market for its two most important products, gas and oil. The growth of trade with China under preferential conditions was to be expected, but India has also joined this increase, providing Russia with a lifeline that has allowed it to maintain, indirectly and guaranteeing benefits to intermediaries, additional trade with European countries. The two great Asian continental powers have also been joined by Pakistan, a traditional customer of Saudi oil, which seeks to take advantage of the discounts that Russia is offering on its products to open new trade channels and deepen political relations even with historical opponents firmly established in the US bloc in the Cold War years.

In the case of Africa, the priority is not the economic relationship, but the political one. The growing importance of the continent, due to its demographic growth and its youth in the face of the aging of Western countries, have made it an important pole in the attempt to create a less hegemonic and more multipolar international order as Russia aspires to. “Africa is on the way to becoming a new center of power that the whole world has to take into account,” Vladimir Putin said in his speech. The respect shown by Russia to African countries, which is expected from diplomacy, contrasts with the treatment that various African leaders received a few weeks ago in Poland-Ukraine, when they found themselves detained and their passage to Ukraine delayed at the expense of the security of the President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, leader of the delegation seeking to mediate between kyiv and Moscow, was disarmed and searched. The growing role of Africa is not only in the formal speeches of the European presidents who receive them, but also in the actions of African leaders, who have stopped looking for solutions in the countries that once colonized them and have begun to openly and directly reject your implication. Proof of this were the difficulties suffered by Emmanuel Macron, accustomed to stellar receptions, on his last tour of what France continues to know as Françafrique .

Faced with this interventionism in the former colonies that European countries or the military omnipresence of the United States have repeatedly shown, Russia has been forced to recover part of Soviet diplomacy to present itself as an external force that seeks to support African countries to achieve the levels of power that would correspond to them due to their demographic weight. The attempt to relaunch political and economic relations with African countries has gained new momentum in the face of the loss of European friendships, but it is not born in a vacuum. To bring together the good number of African leaders that Russia has achieved this week in Saint Petersburg, Moscow has not created a new forum but has recovered the existing one, the Russia-Africa forum, which met in Sochi in 2019. Russia also has the historical baggage of Soviet support for anti-colonial struggles throughout the entire continent, a legacy practically forgotten since the 1990s, but which now does not hesitate to recover. Hence, the Friendship of Peoples University once again bears the name of Patrice Lumumba, eliminated by Yeltsin's Russia, and once again insists on the importance of these academic relations between the two continents.

In this context, it is not surprising that the Kremlin included on its official website the statements by Yoweri Museveni, president of Uganda, in which he mentioned two key moments in the fight against European colonialism: "one was the formation of the African National Congress in South Africa in 1912. That was the first time that Africans began to organize to liberate Africa. Then, in 1917, the communists took power in Russia and they were the first international group to support us." Despite the nervousness caused in the Russian authorities by any link with the communist past, it is these ties that are allowing relations to be relaunched that do not have to start practically from scratch, as is the case with Dmitro Kuleba. The reality is that, right now,

In economic terms, Russian capacity can in no way compete with China's, so Moscow can only make modest proposals. The main novelty at this week's summit was the massive cancellation of debt to African countries, some 21,000 million euros, a symbolic measure, but one that contributes, as far as possible, at least not to worsen the crisis of debt that has been created in recent years on the continent. Vladimir Putin also offered Russian grain at zero cost to six countries on the continent. Russia thus seeks to be seen as a country willing to contribute to guaranteeing food security despite the breakdown of the Ukrainian grain export agreement. As the Russian president recalled, Russian production significantly exceeds Ukrainian production,

However, it is clear that any war that involves key countries in the market for basic necessities affects development, so the priority is not to solve the consequences but the causes. In this sense, the response of some countries, led by the president of the African Union, is consistent with the position of the African delegation that visited kyiv and Moscow a few months ago. In his speech on Friday, Azali Assoumani said that the Russian proposal to compensate for the loss of Ukrainian grain is enough.

The main demand is that of a ceasefire, an integral part of the peace proposal that the delegation led by Cyril Ramaphosa presented in kyiv and Moscow, but which was only taken into account in Russia. Installed in the dynamics of seeing the war until the recovery of its 1991 borders as the only acceptable way out, Ukraine received the African proposal as one more of the many that it has no intention of evaluating.

Faced with the reception that the African authorities received in Moscow and the recognition of an honest proposal that does not seek its own interest but rather to help the Europeans to end the war, Ukraine maintained its usual line. African leaders were paraded by Bucha in an attempt to impose his position, which is based on repeating over and over again the idea that there is nothing to negotiate. And in later days, Mikhailo Podolyak denied the African position -especially after seeing that it had not changed after the visit to Ukraine- to affirm that African leaders "are not at that level", that is, that their place is not the to mediate in the European war.

Coherent is also the reaction to the Russian grain donation proposal. The problem is not that the quantities that are handled are not considered sufficient, but rather the African will to maintain economic relations with the rest of the countries, not live on donations. Hence the demand for the reopening of the grain corridor and that one of the points of the African peace proposal was precisely the increase in the continent's trade with both Russia and Ukraine. This idea was reflected in the intervention of Museveni, who wondered why his country, which sells the raw material, coffee in this case, obtains less income than a country like Germany, which only processes it. The president of Uganda insisted that his proposal to Russia and China, alternatives to the West,

The summit, with limited economic content, has served to relaunch and consolidate Russia's relations with the countries with which it has traditionally maintained cordial relations, but also with the continent in general. Perhaps the most important statement was made by Vladimir Putin on Thursday when he promised Russian support to guarantee the presence of the African Union as a permanent member of the G20, a forum chosen by Russia, China, India and other emerging countries to achieve a more multipolar world and in that US hegemony continues to decline. For this, both because of its demographic weight and numerical importance in institutions such as the United Nations, especially in the General Assembly.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/07/30/cumbr ... more-27826

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sun Jul 30, 2023 2:21 pm

Declaration of the Second Russia–Africa Summit
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on JULY 29, 2023

Image

We, the Heads of State and Government of the Russian Federation and African States recognized by the United Nations (UN) (hereinafter also referred to as the Russian Federation and African States), and representatives of the African Union and Africa’s leading integration organizations, gathered on 28 July 2023 in Saint Petersburg (Russian Federation) to participate in the Second Russia–Africa Summit,

Reaffirming the principles and objectives enshrined in the Declaration of the First Russia–Africa Summit (Sochi, 24 October 2019), which laid the strategic foundation for our relations in the 21st century,

Building on the historical and time-tested friendly ties between the Russian Federation and African States, mutual respect and trust, traditions of joint struggle for the eradication of colonialism and the establishment of independence of African States,

Welcoming the growing importance of African States and the African Union as the leading continental organization in international affairs, which reflects the increasing global role and influence of Africa as an essential pillar of the multipolar world,

Reaffirming the need to jointly oppose neo-colonialism, imposing conditions and double standards while not allowing these practices to deprive States and peoples of the right to make sovereign choices of their development paths,

Committed to the fundamental principles and purposes of the United Nations Charter, subscribing to safeguarding and upholding international law and emphasizing the need for the adherence thereto by all States,

Confirming the shared responsibility of the Russian Federation and African States for shaping a just and stable world order based on the principles of sovereign equality of States, non-interference in their internal affairs, respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity and the right of all peoples to self-determination as provided, inter alia, by UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, as well as the need to preserve national identity and national resources, cultural and civilizational diversity and to protect traditional values,

Recognizing the central role of sovereign States in decision-making, including in the maintenance of international peace and security, while respecting the diversity of value systems of States and nations within multilateral fora,

Welcoming the readiness of the Russian Federation to continue its consistent support for strengthening the national sovereignty of African States as well as all their security dimensions,

Sharing and supporting the aspirations of African States as enshrined in the African Union’s Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development adopted by the UN General Assembly in its Resolution 70/1 of 25 September 2015,

Expressing deep concern over the challenges related to global food security, including the rise in food and fertilizer prices, as well as the disruption of international supply chains, which disproportionately impact the African continent,

Confirming the willingness to reconcile approaches to energy cooperation issues, with a focus on finding pragmatic, efficient, consensual and sustainable solutions to ensure energy security, access to modern and clean energy sources, eradicate energy poverty and overcome energy shortage,

Welcoming the determination of the Russian Federation to continue providing assistance to African States in order to address issues related to the provision of food, fertilizers and energy resources, as well as carry out international development assistance projects,

Opposing aggressive nationalism, neo-Nazism, neo-fascism, Afrophobia, Russophobia, all forms of racism and racial discrimination as well as discrimination based on religion, belief or origin, xenophobia and related intolerance against in particular but not limited to migrants, refugees, asylum-seekers,

Confirming the importance of establishing and developing effective channels for interaction between integration organizations in which the Russian Federation and the African continent participate,

Acting in accordance with the national legislations of the Russian Federation and African States, have agreed as follows:

Mechanism for Dialogue Partnership

1. Strengthen the role of the Russia-Africa Partnership Forum as the cornerstone of Russia-Africa multilateral cooperation that implements the decisions of the Summit.

2. In the period between Summits, hold annual political consultations between the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and the Chairperson of the African Union Commission, as well as between Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and African Statesand the African Union Commission, in addition to the existing format of dialogue with the present, former and future Presidencies of the African Union.

3. Initiate the creation of a permanent top-level Russia-Africa dialogue mechanism to operate within the African Union Multilateral Partnership framework, in order to coordinate efforts against terrorism and extremism, including violent extremism conducive to terrorism, address environmental, food, and information security issues, participate jointly in African Union programmes on developing the architecture of peace, stability and security.

Political and Legal Cooperation

4. Enhance equal and mutually beneficial cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States in order to contribute tо the establishment of a more just, balanced and stable multipolar world order, firmly opposing all types of international confrontation in the African continent.

5. Contribute to further promoting the central coordinating role of the United Nations as the main global multilateral mechanism for aligning the interests of United Nations Member States and their actions to achieve the goals of the UN Charter as well as to ensure respect for the universally recognized principles and norms of international law enshrined therein.

6. Coordinate, within the United Nations Security Council, approaches towards sanctions policies with regard to African States, including with a view to further easing and lifting restrictive measures that are no longer relevant.

7. Work together to counter the use of illegitimate unilateral tools and methods, including the application of coercive measures in circumvention of the United UN Council and their extraterritorial application, as well as the imposition of approaches that harm primarily the most vulnerable and undermine international food and energy security.

8. Cooperate to achieve the UN Security Council reform taking into account the geopolitical realities and the Common African Position based on the 2005 Ezulwini Consensus and Sirte Declaration with a view to strengthening the representation of Africa in the Council and addressing the historical injustice against it.

9. Counter the imposition in international organizations, primarily in the UN, of dividing lines that hinder the effective search for solutions to pressing issues on the UN agenda, including those that affect vital interests of African States.

10. Strengthen coordination between the permanent missions to the United Nations of the Russian Federation and African States, including African non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, to jointly promote common interests.

11. Strengthen cooperation within other international organizations and consider expanding the practice of providing mutual support at elections to their governing bodies and in decision-making on issues of importance for the Russian Federation and African States in accordance with their national interests and international obligations.

12. Contribute to the effectiveness of secretariats of international and regional organizations underlining the importance of avoiding politicization of their activities and work together to ensure that States that host the headquarters of international organizations comply fully with their obligations so that representatives of member states can freely exercise their powers.

13. Help enhance the BRICS–Africa partnership and establish the Collective Security Treaty Organization–African Union dialogue, as well as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization–African Union dialogue.

14. Contribute to completing the decolonization process in Africa and work to ensure compensation for the economic and humanitarian damage inflicted on African States by colonial policies, including the restitution of cultural property displaced in the process of colonial plundering.

15. Work together to counter manifestations of neo-colonial policies that aim to undermine the sovereignty of States, deprive them of the freedom to make their own decisions, and plunder their natural resources.

16. Step up efforts to combat contemporary forms of racism and racial discrimination, as well as discrimination based on religion, belief or origin, including xenophobia and related intolerance, aggressive nationalism, neo-Nazism and neo-fascism, and resolve to cooperate together to achieve the full implementation of the 2001 Durban Declaration and Progamme of Action (DDPA). Emphasize the increasing relevance of joint actions to combat these forms of intolerance in the context of overcoming the consequences of colonialism, slavery, the slave trade, including the trans-Atlantic slave trade, which were recognized an appalling tragedy in the history of humanity. Counter the dehumanization, including in the media environment, of entire nations, the cancel culture with regard to their civilizational heritage, as well as any kind of cultural appropriation, including prohibition of the use of the mother tongue.

17. Adhere to the principles of international law, as reflected in the UN Charter and the Declaration adopted on 24 October 1970 on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the United Nations Charter.

18. Consolidate the efforts of the Russian Federation and African States, which advocate for restoring the universal respect for international law and strengthening its role as the foundation of international relations. Resist attempts to substitute, revise, or arbitrarily interpret the principles of international law.

19. Oppose initiatives and concepts aimed at creating alternatives to international law, work together to promote stable and just international order based on the universally recognized principles and norms of international law enshrined in the UN Charter.

20. Strongly believe that the principle of sovereign equality of States is crucial for the stability of international relations.

21. Uphold all the principles of the UN Charter including its Article 2 and Article 51.

22. Adhere to the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of States and oppose the extraterritorial application by States of their national laws in violation of international law.

23. Use peaceful diplomatic means, such as dialogue, negotiations, consultations, mediation, and good offices, to resolve international disputes and conflicts, settle them on the basis of mutual respect, compromise, and the balance of legitimate interests.

24. Contribute to improving the mechanism for applying international sanctions based on the exclusive competence of the UN Security Council to impose such measures and the need to ensure their effectiveness in maintaining international peace and security and preventing the deterioration of the humanitarian situation.

25. Oppose the application of illegitimate unilateral restrictive measures, including secondary ones, as well as the practice of freezing sovereign foreign exchange reserves. Reaffirm the unacceptability of using political blackmail to bring leaders of third countries to implement such measures or influence the political and economic policies of States.

26. Reaffirm the continued importance for the Russian Federation and the African States of the universally recognized principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, which has provided the legal basis for the decolonization process.

27. Stand in solidarity to eradicate the practice of confrontation in international affairs, and resist discrediting certain States for political reasons, introducing political or economic restrictive measures under the pretext of human rights advocacy, oppose attempts by certain States to use unfounded accusations of human rights violations as an excuse for interfering in internal affairs and disrupting activities of international organizations. Contribute to the non-politicized, equitable, and mutually respectful nature of human rights advocacy and promotion and protection of human rights.

28. Strengthen Russia–Africa inter-parliamentary cooperation and coordinate efforts so that international parliamentary events take decisions and adopt resolutions consistent with the interests of the Russian Federation and African States. Hold regular international Russia-Africa parliamentary conferences that would contribute to establishing a regular dialogue between the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and national parliaments of African States, as well as to developing the cooperation of bilateral friendship groups.

29. Strengthen dialogue between political parties, help the major political forces in the Russian Federation and African States coordinate their positions, including at international and regional fora and conferences, with a view to promoting cooperation between Russia and Africa based on the principles of equality, mutual respect, adherence to international law, independence and sovereignty of States.

30. Strengthen cooperation among regions and municipalities, including expanding sister-city ties. Improve the visibility of such cooperation as an important element that promotes multidimensional cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States.

31. Promote people-to-people contacts by drawing on the potential of constructive non-governmental organizations and various fora, including youth fora.

SecurityCooperation

32. Strengthen cooperation between States to counter new challenges and threats, in particular terrorism, extremism, including violent extremism conducive to terrorism, transnational organized crime, illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors, piracy and armed robbery at sea, based on strict compliance with the generally recognized principles and norms of international law, primarily the UN Charter and relevant UN Security Council resolutions, and taking into account the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.

33. Work consistently to increase the level of trust among States and strengthen global and regional stability based on the principle of equal and indivisible security for all States.

34. Continue close cooperation to resolve and prevent conflicts in Africa. The principle of ”African solutions to African problems“ should continue to serve as the basis for conflict resolution.

35. Facilitate African peace efforts on the continent by strengthening the relevant capacities of African States. Advocate for effective measures to enhance the predictability, reliability, sustainability and flexibility of funding for African peace operations under the auspices of the UN Security Council, particularly through the provision of UN assessed contributions and fully-funded African Union Peace Fund.

36. Make joint efforts to ensure long-term food and energy security of the African continent. Strengthen cooperation in countering unlawful unilateral restrictive measures placing African countries at risk of food and energy shortages.

37. Contribute to strengthening and developing the international political framework for maintaining strategic stability, arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery. Collaborate in ensuring the integrity, viability and universalization of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons of 12 June 1968, the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction of 10 April 1972, and the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction of 13 January 1993. Counter attempts to erode the existing architecture of international instruments on arms control, nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament.

38. Counter the attempts to employ international arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation instruments for political purposes not associated with the subject matter of these arrangements.

39. Continue to take joint steps to prevent an arms race in outer space and to preserve it exclusively for peaceful uses for the benefit of all mankind. In this regard, reaffirm the urgent need for a legally binding multilateral instrument establishing reliable guarantees of non-placement of weapons in outer space and non-use or threat of use of force against outer space objects. Support the efforts aimed at the globalization of the international initiative on the no first placement of weapons of any kind in outer space, and call upon all States to join this political commitment.

40. Join efforts within the UN to build an international information security system in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter. Uphold the central role of States in addressing the information and communication technology (ICT) security issues. Work towards establishing universal legally binding norms in this area. Seek the timely adoption of a comprehensive UN convention on countering the use of ICTs for criminal purposes. Jointly support the establishment of an equitable and transparent interstate system of Internet governance, while preserving the sovereign right of States to regulate national segments of the global network. Facilitate efforts to bridge the digital divide.

Trade and Economic Cooperation

41. Encourage further strengthening of trade, economic, and investment cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States. Foster the economic, trade and investment partnership between the Russian Federation and the African Union, as well as the leading African regional organizations – the Arab Maghreb Union, the Southern African Development Community, the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa, the East African Community, the Economic Community of West African States, the Economic Community of Central African States, and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development.

42. Welcome the operationalisation of the African Continental Free Trade Area in order to enhance the market integration, industrialisation and economic development of the African continent by facilitating technology transfer and encouraging investment. In this regard facilitate further cooperation between the Russian Federation and Africa in attracting investment, promoting the development of value chains and boosting mutual capacity to produce and export value added manufactured products.

43. Facilitate equitable access of all States to the benefits of the world economy and the international division of labour, as well as to modern technologies to support equitable and even development.

44. Contribute to sustainable and comprehensive economic growth, and a more representative system of international economic governance to respond effectively to global and regional economic and financial challenges.

45. Oppose any unilateral measures, protectionism and discrimination, and continue efforts aimed at implementing the Sustainable Development Goals to make the global economic system more oriented towards attainment of economic and social rights, including the right to development.

46. Stress the need for inclusive multilateral financial measures that provide relief of the debt burden for low- and middle-income countries.

47. Call for concrete actions to reform the policies and practices of the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) to scale up financing for developing countries to assist them in achieving Sustainable Development Goals.

48. Facilitate the restructuring of the global financial architecture to better address the growing developmental needs and reflect the interests and increasing influence of developing countries, as well as to overcome the adverse impact of conditions imposed on them in relation to the full and effective enjoyment of human rights.

49. Welcome membership of the African Union in the G20. Enhance the African representation in the G20.

50. Agree on the need to reform the WTO to ensure an open, transparent, inclusive, and non-discriminatory world trading system while preserving the WTO fundamental principles, including the special and differential treatment for developing and the least developed countries. The reform process should be inclusive, transparent and member-driven.

51. Provide support to Russian and African entrepreneurs in exploring ways of mutually beneficial cooperation.

52. Provide the necessary assistance to efforts to formalize the dialogue between the Eurasian Economic Union and Africa’s regional and other integration structures in order to enhance mutually beneficial cooperation in the field of sustainable economic development, industry, agriculture, trade, digital economy, logistics, business development, and in other matters within the competence of these integration structures.

53. Encourage cooperation between the Russian Federation and African States in the field of trade, industrial development and investment flows facilitation, in particular within the framework of the Third Industrial Development Decade for Africa (2016–2025) proclaimed by the UN General Assembly.

54. Assist the work of bilateral Russian-African intergovernmental commissions, committees on trade and economic, scientific and technical cooperation, and sectoral working groups, encourage the establishment of new partnerships between the Russian Federation and African States.

55. Work together to ensure access to reliable, modern and clean energy sources in order to improve access to energy and eradicate energy poverty and overcome energy shortage with due regard to their obligations under international law.

56. Develop cooperation in the field of energy security, diversification of energy resources and development of domestic energy markets of African States, taking into account the right of each State to formulate its own national policy in this area with due regard to their obligations under international law.

57. Emphasize the importance of enhancing energy security and market stability by strengthening value chains, promoting open, transparent, and competitive markets, ensuring the protection of critical energy infrastructure and condemning terrorist attacks against any critical infrastructure, including energy infrastructure.

58. Promote balanced distribution of risks and responsibilities between energy producers and consumers to support African developing countries, as well as to facilitate a just energy transition and relevant international cooperation.

59. Promote food sovereignty and security for African States, particularly net food importing countries, inter alia, through cooperation aimed at developing Africa’s own sustainable agricultural production, including technology transfer.

Scientific and technical, humanitarian, educational, cultural, sports, health, youth and information cooperation

60. Develop cooperation in the field of education, facilitate participation in joint research projects, organization of scientific conferences and seminars, expansion and deepening of collaboration between educational institutions of the Russian Federation and African States. Promote professional training programmes, academic and student exchanges, as well as the study of the Russian language in African countries and the development of African studies in Russia.

61. Strengthen national health systems and improve their reliability and sustainability in the fight against epidemics, pandemics, and other public health challenges, whilst commending the work of the African Union on pandemic preparedness, responsiveness and resilience through the Africa Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

62. Consider the possibility of cooperation in the field of prevention of and response to natural disasters and epidemics, discuss ways of strengthening cooperation in such areas as promoting socio-economic development, providing humanitarian assistance, combating climate change, drought and desertification, disaster prevention and response, as well as emergency monitoring and forecasting.

63. Respect civilizational and national diversity of the Russian Federation and Africa, emphasize the uniqueness of the traditions and historical heritage of our peoples. Develop cultural dialogue in order to maintain the traditional spirit of friendship and cooperation in Russian-African relations. Strengthen cultural ties as a tool for achieving mutual understanding.

64. Facilitate the holding of cultural and humanitarian events, mutual visits of artists for the purposes of developing creative contacts, exchanging experience, participating in conferences, symposiums and other thematic fora.

65. Develop Russian-African cooperation in the field of preservation, restoration and protection of cultural property.

66. Develop cooperation in the field of sports. Promote exchanges of delegations, athletes, teams, coaches and other specialists in the field of sports training. Jointly oppose the politicization of sports within international organizations and advocate a guaranteed free access for athletes and sports organizations to international sports activities, explore the possibilities of developing new formats of sports cooperation between Russia and African States.

67. Promote cooperation in the field of tourism, dissemination of information on tourism opportunities of the Russian Federation and African States.

68. Establish cooperation between Russian and African youth organizations and promote the organization of thematic events to further strengthen and develop youth cooperation.

69. Develop cooperation in the field of information, including strengthening contacts between national media, providing professional and advanced training for journalists, expanding information exchange, implementing joint media projects, ensuring respect for the rights of journalists and promoting the development of media outlets of compatriots living abroad.

Environmental and Climate Cooperation

70. Welcome the outcomes of the 27th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt,

6–20 November 2022) and step up international efforts to fully implement, on the basis of best available science and Common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR&RC), the provisions of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of 9 May 1992 and its Paris Agreement of 12 December 2015, including ensuring the adaptation and greater resilience of States to the negative effects of climate change, as well as responding to loss and damage. Work on just energy transition pathways, and in line with efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in accordance with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Acknowledge the efforts of African States in this field within the framework of the African Union’s Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want.

71. Step up efforts to combat the effects of climate change in Africa as one of the regions most vulnerable to climate change, transfer relevant low-emission technologies, build the capacity of African States and enhance their ability to improve resilience and adapt to climate change, bearing in mind that financing climate action should not increase the debt of African States or jeopardize their sovereignty.

72. Increase cooperation to prevent the politicization of international environmental and climate action, its use to gain unfair competitive advantage, interfere in internal affairs of States and restrict the sovereignty of States over their natural resources with due regard to their obligations under international law.

73. Recognize the right of each State to choose its own best mechanisms and means for protecting and managing the environment, adapting to climate change and ensuring a just energy transition in line with national circumstances and capacities.

74. Develop cooperation in joint projects on environmental protection and sustainable development, including on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of low-emission energy and support for the development of a circular economy.

Kremlin

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/07/ ... ca-summit/

*******

Russia-Africa Forum Analyzes Urban Infrastructure Development

Image
TV BRICS CEO Janna Tolstikova, July 27, 2023. | Photo: TV BRICS

Published 28 July 2023

Participants discussed the issues of modernisation and improvement of infrastructure and the introduction of innovative approaches⁠

On Thursday, on the margins of the second Russia-Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum in St. Petersburg, a panel session entitled "Infrastructural Development, Innovations and Comfortable Urban Environment" was held.

The session participants discussed the issues of modernisation and improvement of infrastructure, introduction of innovative approaches and technologies. They also considered measures to create a favourable environment for business and attract foreign investors, contributing to the sustainable development of cities in both regions.

Janna Tolstikova, CEO of TV BRICS, spoke about the role of the media network in popularising innovations to create a comfortable urban environment.

"Today, TV BRICS has more than 50 media partners in BRICS, Africa, Eurasia and Latin America. We work with our partners on the principle of information exchange. Thanks to our cooperation with media outlets in Africa, we receive high-quality journalistic information about the state of modern life in these countries. We translate this information into different languages - Russian, Portuguese and Chinese, and place materials in the national media of the "five" countries. The same thing works in reverse. This is how we tell about modern Russia on the media platforms of African countries" Tolstikova said.


"Of course, infrastructural development, innovation and comfortable environment are the topics that we as an international information hub pay special attention, by facilitating the exchange of views and experiences on sustainable development of Russian and African cities," she added.

Janna Tolstikova said that TV BRICS cooperates with the Zimbabwean media, which focuses, among other things, on the issues of national housing construction. Zimbabwe's new housing policy was adopted in 2021, with a focus on providing comfortable, affordable and quality housing for different segments of the population, as well as developing inclusive cities and human settlements and creating smart cities, which fully correlates with the African Union's 2063 Agenda and the UN Sustainable Development Goals, which Zimbabwe also supports.

"We are developing smart cities, we have advanced technology and we want to provide people with not just housing but multifunctional housing. We want people to live there comfortably, we want them to be able to work, we want the housing to be in an accessible location. We have a system like the Russian Federation that helps people to improve their housing conditions," said Joy Makumbe, secretary in the Housing Ministry of Zimbabwe.

In his turn, Deputy Minister of Construction, Housing and Utilities of the Russian Federation Nikita Stasishin explained the current state of the construction sector in Russia and what experience the Russian Federation is ready to share with Africa:

"On the instructions of the President, an infrastructure menu has been launched. This is a huge amount of money that goes to modernise engineering, transport, utilities and social infrastructure. Our country's team in terms of urbanisation of the building block, comfortable urban environment, smart city and transformation of the housing and utilities sector is working towards one goal - to change the quality of life of our citizens. But in order to change in practice, we must first do a huge amount of work - normative, scientific, and take advantage of the world's best practices in order to make standards."


"At the same time, we have a huge scientific base with technical solutions for the development of agglomeration of cities with millions of inhabitants, as well as single-industry towns and small cities. This is something we could share with African countries," he noted.

Yuri Grishan, the Mayor of Magadan, told about the role of public-private partnership in the development of the city infrastructure:

"Thanks to "DOM.RF" funding, we have conducted a lot of research on civil society, it helped us attract a lot of investors to Magadan. In addition to the fact that we receive state funding from various sources and banking structures, we have 14 concession agreements being implemented on the territory of the city of Magadan. Among them are infrastructure projects, schools, kindergartens, sports complexes and so on. This has become possible due to the fact that investors understand what will happen on this territory and that the money they invest, they invest with benefit. We want to create the same conditions as in tourist cities in Russia."

"In Tanzania, the same as in Magadan, the gold is mined and for many years we have been supplying there the washing equipment, because the method of gold mining is the same. We are ready to renew the contacts that we had in the field of construction as well," added the mayor of the Magadan city.

Tafadzwa Muguti, Commissioner of the Presidential Administration of the Republic of Zimbabwe for the Development of Harare Province, noted the peculiarities of the province in terms of transport infrastructure development and spoke about the prospects for cooperation with Russia in this area:

"One of the opportunities to improve transport infrastructure is to intensify partnership relations with the Russian Federation. Thanks to cooperation with Russian cities we could create new master plans for the development of municipalities".

The panel discussion gave the experts an opportunity to share best practices, highlight modern requirements for infrastructure development and consider innovative approaches that can make cities more convenient and environmentally sustainable. The second Russia-Africa Forum is taking place in St. Petersburg on 27-28 July.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0018.html

******

Niger became a hostage of the anti-Russian policy of the West
July 29, 20:08

Image

Niger became a hostage of the anti-Russian policy of the West

The army of Niger went over to the side of the rebels, and President Mohamed Bazum had little chance of retaining power. This is a big blow for Paris, since the supply of uranium ore from these places is of critical importance to it. It was because of France that Niger went against Russia. Because of her, he is so unhappy.

The President of the Republic of Niger, Mohamed Bazum, could now admire the Palace Square in St. Petersburg, but instead he was taken hostage by armed rebels and removed from the leadership of the country. And he can thank official Paris for this, since Niger refused to participate in the Russia-Africa summit under pressure from France, its permanent partner, or, to put it better, the overseer.

They have had an unhealthy relationship since the end of the 19th century, when the French decided to conquer the Lake Chad basin and sent there the so-called Central African Expedition under the command of Captain Paul Voulet. As a method of colonization, he chose robbery and massacres - atrocities of such a level that a scandal broke out in Paris, and the thug was rushed to be fired. Voule shot the messenger with the order to remove him, mutinied with the intention of becoming the head of a new African empire, but was eventually killed by the Senegalese in the French service from among the expedition members.

Shortly before this, Voule had ordered the execution of 150 women and children in retaliation for the deaths of two soldiers. This nightmarish incident, among many others, explains the continued anti-colonial sentiment in Niger. This piece was not easy for the French, but they achieved their goal - and they still have not let it out of their teeth.

When it became bad manners to have colonies in the world, President Charles de Gaulle decided to make them an autonomy within France. The predominantly illiterate population of Niger allegedly voted for this in a referendum, after which supporters of independence were expelled from there, but only two years later, in 1960, independence was nevertheless proclaimed - autonomy seemed to be not enough for local leaders.

The new state was headed by Amani Diori, a former member of the French parliament from among the supporters of autonomy. He quickly established an authoritarian regime and tied his homeland with allied treaties with Paris. The income from French uranium mining was enough for the elite, the rest of the population lived in impenetrable poverty, and the Diori regime, carried away mainly by foreign policy, controlled for the most part only the capital and its environs - other territories existed as subsistence farming under the yoke of local leaders.

In 1974, the regime fell, and Niger embarked on a planid widespread in Africa - from one military coup to another. In almost 65 years of formal independence, there have been seven constitutions and only one peaceful transfer of power from president to president - that same Mohamed Bazum in April 2021.

But even this "historical record" at the last moment was almost covered with a copper basin: another, but unsuccessful attempt at a military coup took place two days before Bazum's inauguration.

Such an intense struggle for power does not go in vain: ranking fifth in the world in uranium mining, Niger is one of the least developed countries in the world, and in some years it set a global anti-record in the so-called Human Development Index. The reason is not only in local poverty, but also in endemic illiteracy.

This situation is convenient for the French, who hooked the authorities of Niger (all authorities, in turn) on their subsidies and technologies. The country's only wealth is uranium, and extracting profit from it is inaccessible to the local economy due to underdevelopment. So the French who speak the same (French) language with the elite are monopolists there, who can open any door with their foot.

If the people of Niger are less busy with everyday survival, they will finally be able to master reading and question the fairness of the distribution of wealth in the country. And also about why everything is still commanded by white people, whose ancestors carried out ethnic cleansing in these places.

Niger's dependence on Paris is also strong because it is mutual. The energy basis of France is not gas, as in Germany, but a peaceful atom. Niger gives the French up to 40% of the required uranium. And besides, he sheltered a French military group expelled from neighboring Mali and Burkina Faso.

There, too, life is from coup to coup, and at this historical stage, the new authorities decided to get rid of French influence and unambiguously showed the colonialists the door.

It is believed that the textbook Wagner PMC, which later occupied the French barracks, took part in this. The French media fantasize about the participation of Wagner in the Nigerian coup, too, which in their case resembles paranoia, although we have to admit that the founder of this PMC, Yevgeny Prigozhin, knows how to surprise.

Be that as it may, in fact, many expect from Niger that he will now go over to the anti-French Fronde, and that he will begin to take invitations to Russian summits more seriously. After all, he really has something to hate France for.

But it is unfair to lay the blame for the country's plight on the French alone. The constant struggle for power and resources in Niger is provoked by many things, up to the ethnic picture on the ground.

Slightly more than half of the population belong to the Hausa people. However, the Djerma are considered the state-forming people: they are less than 20%, but they are the absolute majority in the capital, the city of Niamey, and its environs. The administrative center of the country was subordinate to President Diori even during the decline of his power, also because he is also a local germa.

To the north live nomads - the Tuareg, who regularly raise uprisings, as well as the Arabs. They are less than 2%, but their number includes the now overthrown Bazum. That is, the president of the country is a stronghold of French influence in Africa, the black majority of which was persecuted on a racial basis, white by local standards. Such is BLM.

The forecast for the future of Bazum is quite unambiguous - he will not be president. The day that for him and his French friends was supposed to be the day of the boycott of the Russia-Africa summit, became for Niger the day of the change of power. If on the first day there was still a theoretical scenario according to which the army would recapture the president from the rebels from among his personal guards, then on Thursday the military command announced that it would join the junta in order to “prevent bloodshed.”

It is more difficult with the future of Niger as a whole. Despite all the local storms, the French usually managed to keep this territory under their control, since the cost of losing for them is high - much higher than the geopolitical defeats in Burkina Faso or Mali, for which Emmanuel Macron blames Russia.

However, this is Macron's self-defense - to blame Russia. His active and inactive participation in the collapse of French influence in Africa is much more significant. With such a "talented" leadership, Niger can also be lost.

Perhaps this is just as inevitable a loss as the loss of Algeria, reflected back by General de Gaulle (the pride of the French empire is now one of the most pro-Russian countries in Africa, and openly pro-Russian at that). Because France is “no longer the same”, but before that, too, was a damned bastard.

When Paul Voulet united the French colonies in West Africa with fire and sword, one of the tribes that challenged him was the Aznu tribe, led by Queen Sarraunia. The locals considered her a witch.

The people of Sarraunia lost the battle imposed on the invaders rather ingloriously. Having fled, the queen of the French must have cursed, otherwise what a witch she is. The locals know better - to believe in it or not, but a political marriage with Paris cannot be happy - a hundred and thirty years of guarantee.

(c) D. Bavyrin

https://www.discred.ru/2023/07/28/glava ... ta-rossii/ - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8529631.html

Google Translator

******

General Abdourahamane Tchiani Declared New Niger’s President

Image
General Abdourahamane Tchiani, proclaimed head of the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland. Jul. 28, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@Halbeeg_News
Published 28 July 2023

A group of soldiers of the Presidential Guard announced late on July 26 to have overthrown President Mohamed Bazoum.

The head of Niger's Presidential Guard, General Abdourahamane Tchiani, has proclaimed himself the new president of Niger on Friday, according to state television.

Tchiani appeared on the country's state-run Tele Sahel channel, declaring himself head of the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland, the country's highest body of authority.

This comes after a group of soldiers belonging to the Presidential Guard announced late on July 26 to have overthrown President Mohamed Bazoum. They announced the closure of the national borders, the establishment of a curfew, the suspension of the Constitution and the banning of political parties.

The coup d'état against Bazoum is in response to the "continued deterioration of the security situation and poor economic and social governance," said Major Colonel Amadou Abdramane.


My dear compatriots, receive my first message to the nation as President of CNSP and Head of State of Niger. We must all fight together to save our beloved homeland. Général Abdourahmane Tchiani.

According to Tchiani, who led the presidential guard since 2011, "the harsh reality of insecurity in Niger, experienced by our defense forces and working populations, with its toll of deaths, displacements, humiliations and frustrations, reminds us daily of this stark reality."

The ringleaders of the coup issued the five-article "Order 2023-01 of July 28," including the suspension of the Constitution of November 25, 2010, and the dissolution of its institutions.

Bazoum was held at the government palace by the Presidential Guard as part of the coup actions. He was elected in Niger's first democratic transition of power in 2021.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Gen ... -0027.html

******

Russia-Africa Summit
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 07/30/2023

Image

The Russia-Africa summit with which Moscow has sought to stage the normality despite the war. Of the continental countries, only four have been absent: Niger, immersed in a coup at the moment, Botswana, Kenya and Lesotho. In the same way as with Xi Jinping's visit, which did not entail the signing of any major agreement but did confirm the unaltered continuation of a priority relationship, on this occasion Russia also had a political objective. short-term losses,dissidences in the official position of Brussels in countries like Bulgaria or even in others apparently less likely like Croatia -, Moscow has been forced to look at a much broader map of the world than the one to which it had become accustomed in recent decades.

In economic terms, Russia has so far maintained a part of its direct economic relations with the countries of the European Union, which have not completely abandoned the direct purchase of products such as gas, especially liquefied gas, from Moscow. However, Russia is aware that European countries are ready to look for alternatives to Russian raw materials even at the cost of higher prices. Hence, Moscow has turned to Asia as a priority market for its two most important products, gas and oil. The growth of trade with China under preferential conditions was to be expected, but India has also joined this increase, providing Russia with a lifeline that has allowed it to maintain, indirectly and guaranteeing benefits to intermediaries, additional trade with European countries. The two great Asian continental powers have also been joined by Pakistan, a traditional customer of Saudi oil, which seeks to take advantage of the discounts that Russia is offering on its products to open new trade channels and deepen political relations even with historical opponents firmly established in the US bloc in the Cold War years.

In the case of Africa, the priority is not the economic relationship, but the political one. The growing importance of the continent, due to its demographic growth and its youth in the face of the aging of Western countries, have made it an important pole in the attempt to create a less hegemonic and more multipolar international order as Russia aspires to. “Africa is on the way to becoming a new center of power that the whole world has to take into account,” Vladimir Putin said in his speech. The respect shown by Russia to African countries, which is expected from diplomacy, contrasts with the treatment that various African leaders received a few weeks ago in Poland-Ukraine, when they found themselves detained and their passage to Ukraine delayed at the expense of the security of the President of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa, leader of the delegation seeking to mediate between kyiv and Moscow, was disarmed and searched. The growing role of Africa is not only in the formal speeches of the European presidents who receive them, but also in the actions of African leaders, who have stopped looking for solutions in the countries that once colonized them and have begun to openly and directly reject your implication. Proof of this were the difficulties suffered by Emmanuel Macron, accustomed to stellar receptions, on his last tour of what France continues to know as Françafrique .

Faced with this interventionism in the former colonies that European countries or the military omnipresence of the United States have repeatedly shown, Russia has been forced to recover part of Soviet diplomacy to present itself as an external force that seeks to support African countries to achieve the levels of power that would correspond to them due to their demographic weight. The attempt to relaunch political and economic relations with African countries has gained new momentum in the face of the loss of European friendships, but it is not born in a vacuum. To bring together the good number of African leaders that Russia has achieved this week in Saint Petersburg, Moscow has not created a new forum but has recovered the existing one, the Russia-Africa forum, which met in Sochi in 2019. Russia also has the historical baggage of Soviet support for anti-colonial struggles throughout the entire continent, a legacy practically forgotten since the 1990s, but which now does not hesitate to recover. Hence, the Friendship of Peoples University once again bears the name of Patrice Lumumba, eliminated by Yeltsin's Russia, and once again insists on the importance of these academic relations between the two continents.

In this context, it is not surprising that the Kremlin included on its official website the statements by Yoweri Museveni, president of Uganda, in which he mentioned two key moments in the fight against European colonialism: "one was the formation of the African National Congress in South Africa in 1912. That was the first time that Africans began to organize to liberate Africa. Then, in 1917, the communists took power in Russia and they were the first international group to support us." Despite the nervousness caused in the Russian authorities by any link with the communist past, it is these ties that are allowing relations to be relaunched that do not have to start practically from scratch, as is the case with Dmitro Kuleba. The reality is that, right now,

In economic terms, Russian capacity can in no way compete with China's, so Moscow can only make modest proposals. The main novelty at this week's summit was the massive cancellation of debt to African countries, some 21,000 million euros, a symbolic measure, but one that contributes, as far as possible, at least not to worsen the crisis of debt that has been created in recent years on the continent. Vladimir Putin also offered Russian grain at zero cost to six countries on the continent. Russia thus seeks to be seen as a country willing to contribute to guaranteeing food security despite the breakdown of the Ukrainian grain export agreement. As the Russian president recalled, Russian production significantly exceeds Ukrainian production,

However, it is clear that any war that involves key countries in the market for basic necessities affects development, so the priority is not to solve the consequences but the causes. In this sense, the response of some countries, led by the president of the African Union, is consistent with the position of the African delegation that visited kyiv and Moscow a few months ago. In his speech on Friday, Azali Assoumani said that the Russian proposal to compensate for the loss of Ukrainian grain is enough.

The main demand is that of a ceasefire, an integral part of the peace proposal that the delegation led by Cyril Ramaphosa presented in kyiv and Moscow, but which was only taken into account in Russia. Installed in the dynamics of seeing the war until the recovery of its 1991 borders as the only acceptable way out, Ukraine received the African proposal as one more of the many that it has no intention of evaluating.

Faced with the reception that the African authorities received in Moscow and the recognition of an honest proposal that does not seek its own interest but rather to help the Europeans to end the war, Ukraine maintained its usual line. African leaders were paraded by Bucha in an attempt to impose his position, which is based on repeating over and over again the idea that there is nothing to negotiate. And in later days, Mikhailo Podolyak denied the African position -especially after seeing that it had not changed after the visit to Ukraine- to affirm that African leaders "are not at that level", that is, that their place is not the to mediate in the European war.

Coherent is also the reaction to the Russian grain donation proposal. The problem is not that the quantities that are handled are not considered sufficient, but rather the African will to maintain economic relations with the rest of the countries, not live on donations. Hence the demand for the reopening of the grain corridor and that one of the points of the African peace proposal was precisely the increase in the continent's trade with both Russia and Ukraine. This idea was reflected in the intervention of Museveni, who wondered why his country, which sells the raw material, coffee in this case, obtains less income than a country like Germany, which only processes it. The president of Uganda insisted that his proposal to Russia and China, alternatives to the West,

The summit, with limited economic content, has served to relaunch and consolidate Russia's relations with the countries with which it has traditionally maintained cordial relations, but also with the continent in general. Perhaps the most important statement was made by Vladimir Putin on Thursday when he promised Russian support to guarantee the presence of the African Union as a permanent member of the G20, a forum chosen by Russia, China, India and other emerging countries to achieve a more multipolar world and in that US hegemony continues to decline. For this, both because of its demographic weight and numerical importance in institutions such as the United Nations, especially in the General Assembly.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/07/30/cumbr ... more-27826

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 01, 2023 2:31 pm

Burkina Faso & Mali Warn Against Military Intervention in Niger

Image
People in Niger after the coup. Aug. 1, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@teleSURtv

Published 1 August 2023 (9 hours 8 minutes ago)

“The transitional governments of Burkina Faso and Mali express their fraternal solidarity…"

The military governments of Burkina Faso and Mali said Monday in a joint communiqué that in the event of a military intervention against Niger, it would also represent a declaration of war against them.

“The transitional governments of Burkina Faso and Mali express their fraternal solidarity… to the people of Niger, who have decided with full responsibility to take their destiny in hand and assume the fullness of their sovereignty before history,” the two countries said.

In the event of an intervention against Niger, they declared that self-defense measures would be taken in support of the Armed Forces and the Nigerien people, in addition to warning that it would lead to the withdrawal of Burkina Faso and Mali from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

The two nations also reiterated that their position is "against the disastrous consequences of a military intervention in Niger, which could destabilize the entire region, as happened with NATO's unilateral intervention in Libya, which led to the spread of terrorism in the Sahel and West Africa."


Sanctions #CEDEAO : Burkina and Mali warn against any military intervention in Niger

Meanwhile, both countries, which were the protagonists of a coup d'état, remarked that regional organizations and allies persist "in imposing sanctions that aggravate the suffering of the peoples and endanger the Pan-Africanist spirit".

These countries were referring, according to information platforms, to the financial sanctions against Niger and the military junta imposed by the West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA), as well as to the declaration of ECOWAS.

Following the coup d'état carried out in Niger on July 26, the Nigerien ministers of Petroleum, Mines and Transport, Sani Issoufou Mahamadou, Ousseini Hadizatou Yacoub and Alma Oumaru, were arrested between Sunday and Monday, respectively.

Similarly, the president of the Nigerian Party for Democracy and Socialism (PNSD), Foumakoye Gado, was placed under arrest.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Bur ... -0001.html

******

France denies plans to intervene militarily in Niger

Image
France has denied that French soldiers fired ammunition and tear gas at supporters of the new government in Niger. | Photo: EFE
Posted 1 August 2023 (7 hours 58 minutes ago)

The head of French diplomacy estimated as "possible" the reinstatement of the deposed president of Niger, Mohamed Bazoum.

The French Foreign Minister, Catherine Colonna, denied on Monday the statements of the new government of Niger about alleged plans by the French country to intervene militarily in the African nation to, among other things, rescue the deposed president Mohamed Bazoum, confined in his residence. .

The minister dismissed the revelations of the Nigerese Military Junta as false, along with other statements such as the alleged authorization of President Bazoum, disclosed by his foreign minister, for French special forces to attack the presidential palace in order to restore it.

The official was quick to deny, likewise, the accusations that French soldiers fired live ammunition and tear gas to break up a crowd demonstrating in support of the new regime, which left a balance of six injured who were rushed to the hospital.


"We strongly and clearly deny it, it is false. What we saw yesterday was a violent demonstration, extremely dangerous. Contrary to the claims of some Nigerien military officials, the French security forces did not use any lethal means," Colonna said.

In a joint statement with the Ministry of Defense, the head of French diplomacy considered the reinstatement of deposed President Mohamed Bazoum as "possible". "And it is necessary, because these destabilizations are dangerous for Niger and its neighbors," said the diplomat.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/francia- ... -0002.html

France to evacuate its nationals from Niger after military coup

Image
Paris justified the measure given the acts of violence against the French embassy and the closure of airspace. | Photo: EFE
Posted 1 August 2023 (1 hour 53 minutes ago)

he Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicated that the evacuation of between 500 and 600 French will begin from today.

The Government of France announced this Tuesday that it will begin the evacuation of its citizens in Niger due to the deterioration of the security situation after the coup d'état carried out by the Army against President Mohamed Bazoum.

The French Ministry of Foreign Affairs specified that the evacuation of between 500 and 600 people will begin from today, taking into account the acts of violence perpetrated against the French embassy, ​​the violence in Niamey and the closure of airspace.

Similarly, the Foreign Ministry pointed out that European citizens who wish to leave the African country may also be evacuated while other European nations have not announced such emerging actions.


In this sense, Italy reported that it will charter a special flight so that its nationals can leave the country, meanwhile, Spain declared that it is finalizing the details to start the evacuation.

For her part, the head of French diplomacy, Catherine Colonna, pointed out on Monday the need to reinstate the president deposed by the military, meanwhile, she rejected the accusations about an alleged military intervention by Paris.


At the same time, the chancellor stressed that Russia could take "profit" from the current situation in Niger. However, she added that the coup corresponds to "an opportunistic action" by the military and not to the alleged interference of Moscow.

The French nation, which is the former metropolis of the Nigerien colony, has around 1,500 troops to defend its national interests based on uranium extraction.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/francia- ... -0010.html

Google Translator

******

Sudan: Armed Movements Denounce Representative of the Army

Image
Yasir al-Atta, the assistant commander-in-chief of the Sudan Armed Forces. Jul. 28, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@SudanTribune_EN

Published 28 July 2023

Armed movements: “what was mentioned in Al-Atta’s speech is nothing more than a maneuver which tries to regurgitate the movements of the armed struggle in order to make it part of this absurd war.”


Armed movements in Sudan attack Yasir al-Atta, the assistant commander-in-chief of the Sudan Armed Forces and accuse him of trying to push them to war, describing his speech as "provocative."

Al-Atta had appeared in a video recording in front of a group of army officers and soldiers, in which he attacked the leaders of the armed movements and questioned their sense of belonging to Sudan. Al-Atta denounced the neutral position of the armed movements, that signed the Juba Peace Agreement on …., towards the two sides of the conflict.

The armed movements said in a statement on July 28, signed by the head of the Media Committee of the Joint Force for Armed Struggle, Ahmed Hussein Mustafa, that since the signing of the peace document, the two warring groups have been obstructing the protocol of security arrangements.

The statement added: “What was mentioned in Al-Atta’s speech is nothing more than a maneuver which tries to regurgitate the movements of the armed struggle in order to make it part of this absurd war.”


The statement continued: "What was stated in Al-Atta’s speech is nothing but a call for war, with a provocative approach that questions the patriotism of others and reproaches their positions. It denounced the statement of Al-Atta for describing them as detracting from Sudanese values ​​and lack of manhood and magnanimity." They assured in the declaration, "We will not fight because of anyone’s will…for those without a goal."

The armed movements indicated that their neutrality made it possible for food, medicine, humanitarian aid, and commercial convoys to reach Darfur and Kordofan under the protection of their joint force.

The statement described al-Atta's speech of insults and humiliation as "cheap trading" and an attempt to evade their responsibilities to protect citizens.

It added, “knowing that the depredation and displacement in the city of El Geneina took place in front of the eyes and the full presence of the armed forces without moving a finger.”

It continued, “It seems that al-Atta forgot that he and those with him created the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and a number of militias to fight on their behalf against the armed struggle movements. They were plotting and moving according to their orders, destroying and burning villages.”

Although Sudan has 87 armed movements (84 of which are concentrated in the Darfur area), there are 4 main ones who have been fighting in this region for decades. This is due to the long going conflict in this region.

Most of these armed movements lack a precise methodological vision, but they take advantage of the absence of state prestige to impose the reality of force in certain regions, particularly given the proliferation of over two million firearms in the Darfur region alone.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Sud ... -0025.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 02, 2023 3:17 pm

Burkina Faso’s Interim President Tells His Peers To Stop Being Imperialist Puppets
AUGUST 1, 2023

Image
Ibrahim Traoré President of the Transition of Burkina Faso. Photo: The Alternative World/File photo.

By Andrew Korybko – Jul 30, 2023

What President Traore just did was break the taboo on patriotic military coups by taking advantage of the global attention afforded to the second Russia-Africa Summit to explain why these sorts of regime changes are required to save their countries from Western-backed terrorism when all else fails. He then rightly shamed those of his peers who condemn these anti-imperialist developments whenever they occur and fail to support them despite these patriotic military coups being in all Africans’ interests.

Interim Burkinabe President Ibrahim Traore gave a short but powerful speech at the second Russia-Africa Summit that can be read in full at the official Kremlin website here. The highlight was that he told his peers straight to their faces to stop being imperialist puppets, which was admittedly harsh but definitely needed. President Traore never forgot how many of them condemned the coup that he led late last year, which was carried out to bring security and development to his beleaguered people.

Here are two relevant analyses about Burkina Faso for those readers who haven’t closely followed it:

6 October 2022: “Why’s The West So Spooked By Possible Burkinabe-Russian Military Cooperation?”
5 May 2023: “Burkina Faso’s Strategic Alliance With Russia Will Further Stabilize West Africa”

Readers can now better understand the following excerpt from his speech at last week’s event:

As for Burkina Faso, for the past eight years we have been fighting the most barbaric and cruel form of colonialism and imperialism, which are forcing a modern form of slavery on us. We have learned one thing very well: a slave who cannot protest deserves nothing more than pity, and his future is miserable. We did not wait for anybody to take care of us. We decided to fight the terrorists who are preventing our development.

In this struggle, our courageous people decided to take up arms against terrorism. We were surprised to learn that imperialists refer to them as armed groups or militarised groups, while calling people in Europe who take up arms to defend their homeland patriots. Our forefathers were deported to save Europe, and this happened against their will. But when they came back and tried to assert their basic rights, they faced cruel repression.

The problem is not when people decide to take up arms. The problem is that the leaders of African countries do not bring anything to people fighting imperialism, calling us armed groups or criminals. We do not agree with this approach. We, the heads of African states, must stop acting as puppets ready to act whenever the imperialists pull the strings.


Just like Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki explained during his meeting with President Putin, President Traore also believes that the West is practicing a modern form of slavery in Africa through its various Hybrid Wars there, one of the fiercest of which is against Burkina Faso. Terrorists are employed by that de facto New Cold War bloc as their proxies, which explains why they try to legitimize their demands by describing them as “armed groups” or “rebels” like the West does in the Malian conflict.

Instead of sitting back and letting his country be destroyed, President Traore and his comrades took matters into their own hands to overthrow the corrupt regime that failed to improve the security situation since taking power earlier that year. It was after leading his own military coup that he learned that Burkina Faso’s struggle is really against the West and not just terrorists. As a newly assumed head of state, he then realized that his peers across the region were also aware of this reality as well.

That’s why he was so deeply disappointed in many of them after they condemned his coup exactly as his country’s imperialist enemies wanted them to do. This experience opened President Traore’s eyes to the enormity of Africa’s challenge in fully liberating itself since bonafide modern-day freedom fighters like him, his Malian counterpart President Assimi Goita, and neighboring Niger’s new military junta are opposed tooth and nail by the so-called “African Establishment”.

In fact, the “Economic Community Of West African States” (ECOWAS) promulgated sanctions against Niger on Sunday and also threatened the possible use of armed force if its military leaders don’t reinstate former President Mohamed Bazoum within a week. Readers should know that France and the US, which are jointly working to keep Africa subordinated to the West, have condemned the Nigerien coup and called for its ousted leader’s immediate reinstatement.

These observations extend credence to President Traore’s accusation that many of his peers, especially in the West Africa-Sahel region, are imperialist puppets. To be fair, not a single one of them sanctioned Russia despite immense Western pressure upon them to do so, which suggests that they’re relatively more independent than the Burkinabe leader’s harsh words imply. Nevertheless, there’s also no denying that the “African Establishment” opposes anti-imperialist coups just like the West always does.

The reason why those two’s views are aligned on this sensitive issue might have to do more with each respective leader’s political self-interests in deterring such coups at home than with the West pulling their strings behind the scenes, though the latter no doubt occurs, both on this issue and many others. The importance of clarifying this isn’t to discredit President Traore, whose peers definitely deserved his scathing attack, but to add crucial context to what he said.

Most of the “African Establishment” is corrupt, doesn’t care about their country’s objective national interests, and is closely connected with the West, all of which is resented by the people over whom they rule and thus perpetually leaves their leaders at risk of a patriotic military coup. All manifestations of anti-imperialism are therefore naturally opposed, especially whenever a related coup happens somewhere on the continent because these corrupt leaders fear that it could inspire their armed forces.

What President Traore just did was break the taboo on patriotic military coups by taking advantage of the global attention afforded to the second Russia-Africa Summit to explain why these sorts of regime changes are required to save their countries from Western-backed terrorism when all else fails. He then rightly shamed those of his peers who condemn these anti-imperialist developments whenever they occur and fail to support them despite these patriotic military coups being in all Africans’ interests.

For as impressively as the “African Establishment” has thus far resisted the West’s immense pressure to sanction Russia, which not even those states that voted against it at the UNGA have done, Africa will never become a truly independent pole in the emerging order unless far-reaching reforms occur. These same established forces need to put their personal interests aside for the greater good, but it’s unlikely that the already corrupt ones among them will ever do so, thus exacerbating their people’s ire.

With time, multipolar-inspired anti-government protests might break out and/or patriotic military coups occur, the first of which might even precede the latter and be pointed to by its plotters as proof that they acted in accordance with their people’s will. What’s happening in the West Africa-Sahel region right now with three such regime changes since 2021 in Mali that year, Burkina Faso the next, and now Niger last week is literally revolutionary and greatly accelerates multipolar processes in this part of Africa.

There’ll likely be more across the continent in the coming future too, which is why it’s so important to remember President Traore’s impassioned defense of patriotic military coups and strong condemnation of the “African Establishment” for being imperialist puppets in always opposing them. Despite only being in his mid-30s, the Burkinabe leader is wise far beyond his years and could easily become one of the most important Africans of his generation. It’ll be very interesting to follow his career.

https://orinocotribune.com/burkina-faso ... t-puppets/

******

Niger reopens air and land borders with neighboring countries

Image
The members of the de facto government have not announced what will happen to the borders with nations like Nigeria or Benin. | Photo: EFE
Posted 2 August 2023 (6 hours 36 minutes ago)

The National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland of Niger announces the opening of land and air borders with Algeria, Libya, Chad, Burkina Faso and Mali.

In a statement released Tuesday by Niger's military junta called the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Fatherland (CNSP), it announced the reopening of air and land borders with five neighboring countries for the first time after the military coup against the president's government. Mohamed Bazoum.

This decision will facilitate movements to and from Algeria, Libya, Chad, Burkina Faso and Mali, although the members of the de facto government have not announced what will happen with the borders with nations such as Nigeria or Benin.

The coup leader, General Abdourahmane Tchiani, appeared last Wednesday night for the first time since the coup to announce the dismissal of President Mohamed Bazoum and the closure of the country's borders.


The intervention of the military forces, of nationalist ideology, was motivated by the deepening of the economic and security crisis in the country, which is facing an increase in the operations of various branches of the Islamic State and Al Qaeda terrorist groups.

The coup has brought up some concerns about political instability in a country that has been rocked by four other coups since it gained independence from France in 1960, in addition to several frustrated attempts, such as the one in 2021, days before Bazoum took over.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/niger-re ... -0004.html

Google Translator

******

Niger: The Fourth Country in the Sahel to Experience an Anti-Western Coup
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 1, 2023
Vijay Prashad, Kambale Musavuli

Image
Protesters in Niger hold signs in support of the CNSP and against France

The coup in Niger follows coups in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Guinea. Each of these was led by military officers angered by the presence of French and US troops and by economic crises inflicted on their countries


At 3 a.m. on July 26, 2023, the presidential guard detained President Mohamed Bazoum in Niamey, the capital of Niger. Troops, led by Brigadier General Abdourahmane Tchiani closed the country’s borders and declared a curfew. The coup d’état was immediately condemned by the Economic Community of West African States, by the African Union, and by the European Union. Both France and the United States—which have military bases in Niger—said that they were watching the situation closely. A tussle between the Army—which claimed to be pro-Bazoum—and the presidential guard threatened the capital, but it soon fizzled out. On July 27, General Abdou Sidikou Issa of the army released a statement saying that he would accept the situation to “avoid a deadly confrontation between the different forces which… could cause a bloodbath.” Brigadier General Tchiani went on television on July 28 to announce that he was the new president of the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (Conseil National pour la Sauvegarde de la Patrie or CNSP).

The coup in Niger follows similar coups in Mali (August 2020 and May 2021) and Burkina Faso (January 2022 and September 2022), and Guinea (September 2021). Each of these coups was led by military officers angered by the presence of French and U.S. troops and by the permanent economic crises inflicted on their countries. This region of Africa—the Sahel—has faced a cascade of crises: the desiccation of the land due to the climate catastrophe, the rise of Islamic militancy due to the 2011 NATO war in Libya, the increase in smuggling networks to traffic weapons, humans, and drugs across the desert, the appropriation of natural resources—including uranium and gold—by Western companies that have simply not paid adequately for these riches, and the entrenchment of Western military forces through the construction of bases and the operation of these armies with impunity.

Two days after the coup, the CNSP announced the names of the 10 officers who lead the CNSP. They come from the entire range of the armed forces, from the army (General Mohamed Toumba) to the Air Force (Colonel Major Amadou Abouramane) to the national police (Deputy General Manager Assahaba Ebankawel). It is by now clear that one of the most influential members of the CNSP is General Salifou Mody, former chief of staff of the military and leader in the Supreme Council for the Restoration of Democracy, which led the February 2010 coup against President Mamadou Tandja and which governed Niger until Bazoum’s predecessor Mahamadou Issoufou won the 2011 presidential election. It was during Issoufou’s time in office that the United States government built the world’s largest drone base in Agadez and that the French special forces garrisoned the city of Irlit on behalf of the uranium mining company Orano (formerly a part of Areva).

It is important to note that General Salifou Mody is perceived as an influential member of CNSP given his influence in the army and his international contacts. On February 28, 2023, Mody met with the United States Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley during the African Chiefs of Defense Conference in Rome to discuss “regional stability, including counterterrorism cooperation and the continued fight against violent extremism in the region.” On March 9, Mody visited Mali to meetwith Colonel Assimi Goïta and the Chief of Staff of the Malian army General Oumar Diarra to strengthen military cooperation between Niger and Mali. A few days later on March 16, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Niger to meet with Bazoum. In what many in Niger perceived as a sidelining of Mody, he was appointed on June 1 as the Nigerien ambassador to the United Arab Emirates. Mody, it is said in Niamey, is the voice in the ear of Brigadier General Tchiani, the titular head of state.

Corruption and the West

A highly informed source in Niger tells us that the reason why the military moved against Bazoum is that “he’s corrupt, a pawn of France. Nigerians were fed up with him and his gang. They are in the process of arresting the members of the deposed system, who embezzled public funds, many of whom have taken refuge in foreign embassies.” The issue of corruption hangs over Niger, a country with one of the world’s most lucrative uranium deposits. The “corruption” that is talked about in Niger is not about petty bribes by government officials, but about an entire structure—developed during French colonial rule—that prevents Niger from establishing sovereignty over its raw materials and over its development.

At the heart of the “corruption” is the so-called “joint venture” between Niger and France called Société des mines de l’Aïr (Somaïr), which owns and operates the uranium industry in the country. Strikingly, 85 percent of Somaïr is owned by France’s Atomic Energy Commission and two French companies, while only 15 percent is owned by Niger’s government. Niger produces over 5 percent of the world’s uranium, but its uranium is of a very high quality. Half of Niger’s export receipts are from sales of uranium, oil, and gold. One in three lightbulbs in France are powered by uranium from Niger, at the same time as 42 percent of the African country’s population lived below the poverty line. The people of Niger have watched their wealth slip through their fingers for decades. As a mark of the government’s weakness, over the course of the past decade, Niger has lost over $906 million in only 10 arbitration cases brought by multinational corporations before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the International Chamber of Commerce.

France stopped using the franc in 2002 when it switched to the Euro system. But, fourteen former French colonies continued to use the Communauté Financiére Africaine (CFA), which gives immense advantages to France (50 percent of the reserves of these countries have to be held in the French Treasury and France’s devaluations of the CFA—as in 1994—have catastrophic effects on the country’s that use it). In 2015, Chad’s president Idriss Déby Itno said that the CFA “pulls African economies down” and that the “time had come to cut the cord that prevents Africa from developing.” Talk now across the Sahel is for not only the removal of French troops—as has taken place in Burkina Faso and in Mali—but of a break with the French economic hold on the region.

The new non-alignment

At the 2023 Russia-Africa Summit in July, Burkina Faso’s leader, President Ibrahim Traoré wore a red beret that echoed the uniform of the assassinated socialist leader of his country, Thomas Sankara. Traoré reacted strongly to the condemnation of the military coups in the Sahel, including to a recent visit to his country by an African Union delegation. “A slave that does not rebel does not deserve pity,” he said. “The African Union must stop condemning Africans who decide to fight against their own puppet regimes of the West.”

In February, Burkina Faso had hosted a meeting that included the governments of Mali and Guinea. On the agenda is the creation of a new federation of these states. It is likely that Niger will be invited into these conversations.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism and (with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of U.S. Power.

Kambale Musavuli, a native of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), is a leading political and cultural Congolese voice. Based in Accra, Ghana, he is a policy analyst with the Center for Research on the Congo-Kinshasa.

This article was produced by Globetrotter.


Thousands rally in support of Niger’s coup leaders as Western-backed ECOWAS threatens military intervention
Pavan Kulkarni
Niger

Image
ECOWAS has threatened military intervention if deposed President Mohamed Bazoum is not restored in a week. Bazoum was overthrown in a coup by officers who have received support from thousands in the country

The military junta which took power in Niger last week warned on Monday, July 31 that France might militarily intervene with authorization from the ousted government’s foreign minister to restore Mohamed Bazoum to the presidency.

Thousands have mobilized to the streets to welcome the military takeover, sloganeering against their former colonizer — “Down with France,” “Foreign bases out.” Protesters reportedly tore out the plaque on the French embassy in capital Niamey and torched its door on Sunday, July 30.

With drones and airplanes reportedly backing up to 1,500 of its troops in Niger, France, along with the US which has another 1,100 troops in two military bases, has extended support to the West African regional bloc which on Sunday threatened a military intervention.

Imposing a no-fly zone and freezing Niger’s assets in its central and commercial banks, the 15-member Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) said on Sunday that it will “take all measures necessary,” including “the use of force,” to restore Bazoum to presidency.

Bazoum was taken captive and removed from office on July 26 in a coup led by the head of the presidential guard, Gen. Abdourahmane Tchiani. Speaking on behalf of the military junta which has called itself the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP), Col Maj Amadou Abdramane announced in a televised statement, “the defense and security forces.. have decided to put an end to the regime… This follows the continuing deterioration of the security situation, and poor economic and social governance.”

“ECOWAS condemns in the strongest possible terms the attempt to seize power by force and calls on the coup plotters to free the democratically elected President of the Republic immediately and without any condition,” said its current chair, Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, immediately after the coup.

“[T]he EU also associated itself with ECOWAS’ first response to the matter,” said the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, adding that the “EU condemns all attempts to destabilize the democracy.” US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan also condemned “any effort to…subvert the functioning of Niger’s democratically elected government.”

The first ever “democratic transition?”

After taking office in April 2021 following what is described as the “first-ever democratic transition” in the country, Bazoum instituted an internet shutdown for 10 days while the security forces cracked down on protests and arrested hundreds, amid accusations of irregularities.

In November that year, militant mass demonstrations tried to stop the movement of a French army convoy through the country, enroute from Ivory Coast to Mali. French soldiers and the Nigerien gendarmes escorting their convoy fired shots and tear gas, killing two Nigeriens and wounding 18.

Angry protesters also confronted the convoy all along its route through Burkina Faso before entering Niger. Two months later, in January 2022, Burkina Faso’s president was ousted in a popular coup. After consolidating power with another coup in September 2022, the junta demanded that the French troops leave Burkina Faso in January 2023. Mass demonstrations welcomed their military government’s decision.

In Mali, French troops had withdrawn by August 2022, six months after the military government, which had similarly consolidated power with two popular coups, demanded they leave. Tens of thousands took to the streets of the capital Bamako in celebration.

Announcing the withdrawal of 2,400 troops from Mali, French president Emmanuel Macron had said at the time that the “heart” of France’s military operation in Sahel “will no longer be in Mali but in Niger.”

Impervious to the popular sentiment against France in Niger and other former colonies in West Africa, the democratically elected Bazoum, touted by the BBC as “a key Western ally,” welcomed into Niger the French troops ordered out of Mali.

“It is unacceptable and intolerable to accept this redeployment on our territory,” Maïkol Zodi, a leader of the protest movement calling for the withdrawal of French troops, had said at the time, warning that “we will treat them as an occupying force.”

Later in August that year, 15 civil society organizations came together to form “M62: Sacred Union for the Safeguard of the Sovereignty and Dignity of the People” to launch a joint struggle against the French military’s presence in Niger. The M62 Movement’s coordinator, Abdoulaye Seydou, said at the time that the French troops, deployed as a part of Operation Barkhane, have “killed more civilians than terrorists,” DW reported.

Donning a T-shirt with Thomas Sankara’s image at the protest the M62 led in September 2022, he told the AFP, “there are anti-French slogans because we demand the immediate departure of the Barkhane force in Niger, which is alienating our sovereignty and destabilizing the Sahel.”

Operation Barkhane ended in failure, but French troops remain

Starting from 2014, Operation Barkhane was a Sahel-wide expansion of Operation Serval launched in Mali in 2013. Barkhane’s aim was to defeat the Islamist insurgencies, which were a fallout of the NATO’s war destroying Libya, in which France itself was a major participant. At its peak strength, the Barkhane force consisted of 5,500 French soldiers deployed in Mali, Niger, Chad, Burkina Faso, and Mauritania.

From the start of Operation Barkhane to mid-2022, violence involving Islamist Militants nearly tripled in the Sahel, according to the Africa Center for Strategic Studies. With this track record of failure, Macron ended the operation in November 2022, announcing however that about 3,000 troops will remain in Niger, Chad, and Burkina Faso.

But two months later, on January 23, 2023, Burkina Faso’s government also asked France to leave. That very day, police in Niger arrested M62 Movement’s coordinator Seydou in what Frontline Defenders deemed to be an “arbitrary detention…directly linked to his peaceful and legitimate work in defense of human rights.”

Later in April, he was sentenced to nine months imprisonment for “disseminating data likely to disturb public order.” Rallying behind the recent coup, M62 has called on Niger’s military government to release anti-French activists like Seydou who were incarcerated by the government of Bazoum.

Breaking away from the mass demonstration in front of the parliament on July 27 to support the military takeover, a group of angry Nigeriens chased away politicians from Bazoum’s party headquarters and torched the building.

While a protest in defense of Bazoum’s government quickly fizzled out, the pro-coup demonstrations continue to gain in strength as protesters count on the military junta to follow Mali and Burkina Faso in demanding the withdrawal of French and other western troops.

Alongside Niger’s flags, anti-French protesters also waved Russian flags, reflecting the popular demand to end the country’s dependence on its former colonizer for security and explore an alternative security partnership with Russia instead.

An imminent military intervention

Deeming the coup as “completely illegitimate,” the French president said on July 28, “We also support the regional organizations, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in particular, in their further decisions…”

With the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also conveying American support for ECOWAS chair Tinubu’s “continued efforts to restore constitutional order,” the regional bloc threatened an armed action after the summit in Nigeria on July 30.

In its statement after the summit, ECOWAS warned that it will “take all measures necessary to restore constitutional order in the Republic of Niger. Such measures may include the use of force. For this effect, the chiefs of defense staff of ECOWAS are to meet immediately.”

The junta’s spokesperson Abdramane said ahead of this summit that its “objective” was “to approve a plan of aggression against Niger through an imminent military intervention.. in collaboration with other African countries that are non-members of ECOWAS, and certain western countries.” He added, “We want to once more remind ECOWAS or any other adventurer, of our firm determination to defend our homeland.”

Former CIA analyst Cameron Hudson, tweeted about a “speculation” that Chad’s president, Mahamat Idriss Déby, “is being asked to lend his forces to help plan/lead a possible intervention force in Niger, as the most capable force in closest proximity.”

Incidentally, Gen. Deby also took power in a coup after his father and former president Idriss Deby died on the front while commanding his armed forces against a rebel group in northern Chad in April 2021.

However, unlike in the case of Mali, Burkina Faso or Niger where the coups have been welcomed by mass demonstrations, Chad’s coup leader has been facing pro-democracy protests, including a major one on October 20, 2022, which was met with a violent crackdown.

FP described it as “one of the worst repression in the country’s history.” Hundreds were imprisoned. Deby’s government admitted that 50 people, including 10 security personnel, were killed, but pro-democracy organizations and political parties claimed that as many as 200 people were killed.

Nevertheless, not having called for the withdrawal of French troops, Deby remains in the good books of ECOWAS and its western backers. Arriving in Niger on Sunday, he held a meeting with Gen. Tchiani and will be reporting back to ECOWAS chair Tinubu, who assumed Nigeria’s presidency earlier this year after winning an election marred by allegations of voter suppression.



https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... tern-coup/

******

France began evacuating its citizens from Niger
colonelcassad
August 2, 10:58

Image

France began to take out its citizens from Niger, along the way continuing to threaten the military seized power. Following France, the export of their citizens began other EU states.
The threat of foreign intervention is on the agenda. The removal of citizens may precede the preparation of an armed invasion of Niger by a coalition of several African states with the support of NATO countries. To date, Niger has opened borders with Mali, Chad, Algeria, Burkina Faso and Libya. Three of these countries have Wagner PMCs, and Algeria is one of the main buyers of Russian weapons in the region.

However, the readiness of Algeria, Mali and Burkina Faso to stand up for Niger and fight the aggressors on its territory somewhat complicates the plans of potential interventionists, since instead of the usual local aggression, a war may turn out that will cover the entire region. In addition, the aforementioned African countries have threatened to withdraw from ECOWAS in the event of an invasion of Niger, which will lead to further fragmentation of the bloc dependent on France.

In the meantime, there is no intervention, the military is strengthening its power and has already frozen the export of gold and uranium to Europe.
Even now it is not difficult to predict that if the West does not start a war of conquest in Niger, this will lead to further depletion of the West's influence in West Africa with the automatic growth of the influence of Russia and China.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8537440.html

EU threatens military intervention in Niger
August 1, 20:24

Image

How interesting the plot twists.

EU threatens military intervention in Niger

The European Union (EU) is ready to consider supporting a military operation against Niger if an appropriate application is received from the Economic Community of West African Countries (ECOWAS). This was announced at a briefing by the official representative of the EU Foreign Service, Nabila Massrali. The broadcast of the event is available on the website of the European Commission.

“The European Union has not yet received any such requests from ECOWAS, but we are ready to consider them if they come,” the diplomat said, adding that this request will be considered by the European Union “in order to best fulfill its political obligations.”

According to Massrali, the coup in Niger is a threat to democracy. “We fully support the position of ECOWAS that the coup is a violation of the democratic principles on which political power in the region is based,” she stressed.

https://vott.ru/entry/630750 - zinc

Mali, Burkina Faso and Algeria are ready to take the side of Niger.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8536765.html

Google Translator

******

INTERVIEW: France’s Colonial Past and Blowback, Glen Ford, 2015
Editors, The Black Agenda Review 02 Aug 2023

Image

The late Glen Ford would probably refer to events in Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, and elsewhere as the “blowback” from France’s colonial past.

“Decolonization,” Frantz Fanon once wrote, “is always a violent phenomenon.” It is a “program of complete disorder.” And its violence and disorder, Fanon might add, takes place simultaneously in both the metropoles and the colonies, in the centers of colonial authority and the insurgent territories at the margins of the world.

Let’s take France as an example. While Paris is burning, France’s neocolonial West African territories are about to explode. Protests erupted in Paris after the police murder of 17 year old Nahul Merzouk – but also against decades of institutionalized and entrenched French racism against Black and Arab youth. The protests reverberated across all of France, but also in West Africa, where years of racist French economic, financial, and military meddling and control have shown independence to be nothing more than an exploitative and extractive neocolonial sham. Indeed, on July 26, 2023 in Niger, a military coup d’etat removed the country’s neocolonial government and President Mohamed Bazoum. Young coup supporters protested France’s presence in the country by burning French flags, destroying parts of the French embassy in Niger, and calling for an end to French colonialism in their country.

Niger is only the latest flashpoint in the revolt against France. From 2020 there have been four coups in the Sahel region of the African continent: Mali (2020 and 2021); Guinea (2021), and Burkina Faso (2022). The leaders of these coups have, at least in part, focused on removing France’s oversized - colonial - presence in their countries. Burkina Faso and Mali have succeeded in kicking out French troops. Niger and Guinea want to do the same, and quickly.

The late Glen Ford would probably refer to what is happening in Niger, what happened in Mali, Burkina Faso, Guinea, and across the Sahel, as the “blowback” from France’s colonial past. “France,” he reminds us, “has a whole lot of history to answer for.” This is why it must be terrified of the people that it has “radicalized” because of its centuries and looting and killing and racist discrimination.

In 2015, Ford was interviewed by Jared Ball for The Real News Network on the attacks in Paris by “Islamic extremists.” In the interview, titled “France’s Colonial Past and Blowback,” Ford argued that France’s colonial legacy was being ignored as a source of the attacks. Like no other commentator could, Ford summarized the cause of the imperial blowback in a few short, sharp, and biting sentences: “So now Paris is burning and people are wondering why. Well, the reason Paris is burning is because Paris has done more than almost any other country besides the United States to set the whole world on fire.”

Below, we reprint Ford’s interview to help us understand this new stage of violence and disorder of decolonization in the African world – and to commemorate the second anniversary of the passing of our relentlessly brilliant and politically uncompromised comrade. What we would do for Ford’s analysis today.

Rest in Power, Glen.

France’s Colonial Past and Blowback by Glen Ford

The Real News Network

JARED BALL, PRODUCER, TRNN: Welcome, everyone, back to The Real News Network. I’m Jared Ball here in Baltimore. 129 people were killed in Paris this week in an attack ISIS has claimed credit for. But amid the cause for solidarity with France and President Hollande’s promise to avenge the fallen there may be an issue with historical memory at play here. Glen Ford, founder and executive editor of Black Agenda Report is back with us for this week’s edition of the Ford Report to discuss this and much more. Glen Ford, welcome back to the Real News.

GLEN FORD, EXEC. EDITOR, BLACK AGENDA REPORT: Thanks for the opportunity, Jared.

BALL: So as you watch the post-attack media fallout of sorts in the coverage and the conversation about what’s happened in Paris, what is it that you see going on, or what may be going on, from your perspective?

FORD: Well, I think we can put it this way. The French, and this goes for the British and for the Americans, too, they’re like pyromaniacs who’ve set a fire that they can’t control. And that fire is the fire of Islamic fundamentalist jihad, a jihad that they have carefully stoked for nearly four decades, ever since the CIA and the Saudi Arabians with the cooperation of the rest of the Europeans invested billions of dollars to create the international jihadist network with its headquarters originally in Afghanistan.

The attacks, I think, in Paris are just the latest examples of blowback, only this time on imperial soil. Before that there was, of course, the subway and bus attacks in London, and of course 9/11 here in the United States. But these should all be seen as self-inflicted wounds. France has a whole lot of history to answer for. It’s terrified of what it calls the self-radicalized youth among France’s large Arab minority. But these people, and I want to point out that they are stopped and frisked on the streets of Paris and other French cities at higher rates even than black Africans of French descent, or rather black Africans who are now French. These people were radicalized by French racism. And French racism is a product of French imperialism.

The French foreign minister was at the meeting of the G20 this weekend, and he claimed that the French were singled out, that they were singled out for attacks in night clubs because the French like to dance. Well, the French have never been very famous for their dancing. But they are infamous for having killed a million Algerians in the 1950s and ’60s in trying to put down the Algerian quest for independence. When the French say, as they are now saying, that this weekend’s violence was the worst on French soil since World War II, that is a straight-up lie. The French police, back in 1961, attacked a peaceful demonstration of Algerians and massacred 200 of them, and threw scores of their bodies into the Seine river. The young French folks who are the grandchildren of those Arab victims don’t need to be self-radicalized or taught by some imam about French racism. They know it firsthand.

The French and the British are the ones who cut up the Middle East into little places that they thought they could control. And in the process of doing that, they favored one sect, one religious sect or ethnic sect, over another. They did that in a grand strategy of divide and conquer. And they laid the groundwork for the bloodshed in that part of the world that we see today. France also claims that the Muslim world hates it because it stands for liberte, fraternite and egalite, but all of that’s just for white Frenchmen only. During the whole course of the French revolution, when they were citing those glorious principles, not one Haitian slave was set free by the French. The Haitians had to make war against the French and free themselves.

France claims that it is the great gift to the world, because it has a secular government. Because it separates a church and state. But it’s the second-largest arms merchant to Saudi Arabia, the most fundamentalist and reactionary state in the Muslim world. And in alliance with Saudi Arabia and with of course the United States and Britain, France has waged war against secular governments from Afghanistan to Iraq, to Libya, and to Syria. And now that war, that war against secularism, has come home. And yet the French are crying that evil forces are attacking them because France is a secular state, and oh yes, the people there like to dance. France is only a champion of secularism for white Frenchmen. In the Arab world, France gives arms to the jihadists in order for them to bring down secular governments.

The fact that France has a nominally socialist government makes some leftists in the United States wonder, well, why is this happening? But France had a leftist government, a socialist-led government, back in the 1950s and ’60s when it was killing a million Algerians who were seeking their independence, and they were communists in that government as well, and they went along with the carnage. Because by and large the French, like most white Americans, don’t give a damn about the rights of colored people in the world, especially their colonial subjects. They don’t care that these jihadists who they themselves have financed and nurtured all these years attacked in Beirut and killed defenseless civilians, because, well, those are people of color. But France, in fact, was behind the partition of the Middle East in such a way that Lebanon was so fraught with sectarian impulses and divisions that it had to undergo a long civil war.

So now Paris is burning and people are wondering why. Well, the reason Paris is burning is because Paris has done more than almost any other country besides the United States to set the whole world on fire.

BALL: Well, Glen, listening to you it occurred to me to maybe remind people that they might want to check out the classic Battle of Algiers film about French colonialism in Algeria. But I also …also have them, maybe not even go back that far. Because it was only in 2005, I believe, where a lot of Algerian and African descendants, the successive generations after the colonial period, some even saying the hip-hop generations, uprose and young people were in the streets voicing their concerns with the racism that they continued to suffer as so-called citizens of France, and residents of Paris, even. So I think it’s important that we appreciate this brief history lesson you’ve offered here for this edition of the Ford Report.

FORD: Yes. When we look at the so-called banlieues of Paris we see the ghettos of the United States. We can [ID] that.

BALL: Well, Glen Ford, thanks again for joining us here at the Real News Network and for this edition of the Ford Report.

FORD: Thank you.

BALL: And thank you for joining us here at the Real News. And again, for all involved, I’m Jared Ball here in Baltimore saying as always, as Fred Hampton used to say, to you we say peace if you’re willing to fight for it. So peace, everybody, and we’ll catch you in the whirlwind.

France’s Colonial Past and Blowback: Glen Ford interviewed by Jared Ball for The Real News Network , November 17, 2015.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/inter ... -ford-2015
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Thu Aug 03, 2023 1:54 pm

Briefly about Niger. 08/03/2023
August 3, 6:15 am

Image

Briefly about Niger. 08/03/2023

1. The United States and Italy verbally abandoned the idea of ​​military intervention in Niger, declaring the impossibility of their military intervention. De facto, France is offered to fight for its own (now gone) uranium with its own hands and the hands of local dependent governments.
2. Against the backdrop of the evacuation of some citizens from Niger, the United States has already announced that it will keep its embassy there, but will reduce staff and replace the ambassador. Italy will also keep its embassy, ​​but will take out other citizens - the evacuation is already underway.
3. The worst thing that has happened so far for the military that has seized power in Niger is cutting off the supply of electricity from Nigeria, which will affect local consumers, since Nigeria supplies more than half of the electricity to Niger. Also stopped cash payments to Niger through the World Bank and the EU.
4. Despite threats and pressure, General Chiani said that the military would not make concessions and would not restore the deposed French puppet in power. To pressure and threats, they will respond decisively and not bow down.
5. In addition to Algeria, Mali and Burkina Faso, Guinea, which is in China's sphere of influence, also came out in support of the new authorities of Niger.
6. In the capital of Niger, demonstrations continue in support of the army that seized power, and they also continue to drag and hang Russian flags. Almost all key administrative facilities in the capital are controlled by the rebels. There is no serious resistance, as well as mass demonstrations in support of the overthrown Bazuma.
7. In general, a very interesting story is developing in Niger, which will affect a large number of countries and in one way or another change the balance of power in West Africa. It is already obvious that the French neo-colonial empire has received a heavy blow, and the processes of decolonization, which were suspended after the destruction of the USSR, continue to gain momentum.

Niger will be free!

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8539579.html

google Translator

********

Operation Flintlock: US Military Training in Africa Backfires
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 2, 2023
Kit Klarenberg

Image
Protesters wave Nigerien and Russian flags as they gather during a rally in support of Niger’s coup in Niamey on July 30, 2023. AFP – Getty Images

The coup in Niger demonstrates that for all Flintlock’s success in dislodging troublesome governments, the operation is replete with a high – and perhaps constantly growing – risk of blowback.


On July 28th, members of Niger’s military forcibly seized power, with presidential guard chief General Abdourahmane Tchiani declaring himself the country’s new leader. In response, US officials expressed “unflagging support” for ousted president Mohamed Bazoum, while Brussels summarily suspended all security cooperation with and financial support to Niamey.

In a statement delivered via Nigerien state TV shortly after Bazoum was detained, nine high-ranking army figures explained that the country’s “defense and security forces…decided to put an end to the regime…due to the deteriorating security situation and bad governance.”

Concerns have since resounded throughout the West over the prospect of Niger’s new military government pivoting towards Russia, in the manner of its neighbors Burkina Faso, and Mali. Such fears were surely exacerbated when Yevgeny Prigozhin, leader of Russia’s highly controversial Wagner private military company, described the coup as a triumph:

“What happened in Niger is nothing other than the struggle of the people of Niger with their colonisers…who are trying to foist their rules of life on them and their conditions and keep them in the state that Africa was in hundreds of years ago.”

The prospect of an anti-Western complexion on the part of Niger’s newfangled junta is surely all the more bitter for the US, given that individuals within the military administration, which dubs itself the “National Council for the Safeguarding of the Country”, have received elite military training courtesy of Washington in recent years.

As The Intercept reports, key coup figure Brigadier General Moussa Salaou Barmou, head of Niamey’s Special Operations Forces, spoke proudly in 2021 of his unit’s “very long relationship” with the US, and how “being able to work together in this capacity is very good for Niger.”

Image
Lt. Gen. Johnathan Braga, U.S. Army Special Operations commander, meets with Brig. Gen. Moussa Barmou, Niger Special Operations Forces commander, at Air Base 101, in Niger, on June 12, 2023. Photo: Staff Sgt. Amy Younger/US Air Force

In June, Barmou personally met with Lieutenant General Jonathan Braga, US Army Special Operations Command chief, at Air Base 201. This site, in the Nigerian city of Agadez, serves as the nucleus of Washington’s drone operations in West Africa. The pair reportedly discussed “anti-terrorism policy and tactics throughout the region.”

Barmou was trained at Fort Benning, Georgia, and Washington’s National Defense University. Strikingly, US embassy cables from 2008, released by WikiLeaks, indicate he received this instruction under the auspices of “Exercise Flintlock”. Launched in 2005, ostensibly to provide counter-terror support to West African states, since its inauguration Flintlock-trained soldiers have been central figures in the majority of coups across West Africa.

‘Very Worrisome’

Two years after Flintlock’s birth, US Africa Command (AFRICOM) was inaugurated, embedding Washington within the cores of armed forces in 53 countries throughout the continent, where they remain today. It is surely no coincidence that the rate and volume of coups in Africa expanded exponentially during the same period.

Image
United States and Nigerian Army officers wait for the military demonstration, “Operation Silent Kill” to begin at the African Land Force Summit in Abuja, Nigeria, April 17, 2018 (Angelica Gardner, DVIDS)

Take for instance December 2008, when Flintlock graduate Captain Moussa Dadis Camara seized power in Guinea. While he led the country for only 12 months, his rule was characterised by brutal violence, frequently of a sexual nature.

In September 2009, Camara dispatched Guinea’s presidential guard to suppress opposition protests. They opened fire upon, bayoneted and gang-raped attendees in broad daylight, killing at least 157 people and injuring around 1,200 more. According to contemporary witness accounts, some women were raped via gun barrels. Several victims were shot through their vaginas.

Three years later, Captain Amadou Sanogo, trained by the US on six separate occasions, led a coup in Mali. The upheaval emboldened an Islamist insurgency, leading to French military intervention in 2013. AFRICOM officials referred to Sanogo’s actions as “very worrisome for us”. Meanwhile, US General Carter Ham, Flintlock’s leader at the time, duly admitted to catastrophic failings:

“We were focusing our training almost exclusively on tactical or technical matters. We didn’t spend probably the requisite time focusing on values, ethics and a military ethos…When you put on the uniform of your nation, you accept the responsibility to defend and protect that nation, to abide by the legitimate civilian authority that has been established, to conduct yourselves according to the rule of law. We didn’t do that to the degree we needed to.”

In 2019, AFRICOM’s premier training event was conducted in Burkina Faso. Military Times, a typically unquestioning journal of record for current and former US military personnel, was prompted to ask whether this was a sensible move, given the country’s human rights record and security situation. The US ambassador merely said it was “important” to look at abuse allegations “in light of the environment in which the country is working”.

AFRICOM chief Major General Mark Hicks claimed training military partners in human rights law compliance was an “absolutely critical” element of the program. These entreaties must’ve been ignored by Colonel Assimi Goita, who graduated from a US military training course in 2016, and participated in a US-led training exercise three years later. In August 2020, he seized power in Mali. Photos of Goita being handed a certificate by trainers at a US-German security centre were duly purged from the web.

Appetite for Destruction

Africa’s history of coups over the past century is extensive. As such, some may be tempted to dismiss Flintlock’s significance in fomenting revolution across the continent. Yet, a 2017 Journal of Peace Research study found Washington’s foreign military training efforts roughly doubled the risk of military coups in recipient states.

Based on data from 189 countries between 1970 and 2009, two-thirds of successful coups during this period worldwide were found to have been executed by beneficiaries of US military training. Study authors attributed this phenomenon to training programs greatly increasing military power, in relation to “host” governments.

One needn’t be a cynic to suggest that the propensity of Flintlock graduates to overthrow the governments which they’re meant to serve isn’t a “bug”, but a dedicated, deliberate feature of the program. After all, Africa is an ever-increasingly central theatre in the new Cold War. The regional influence of former colonial powers, such as Britain and France, is rapidly waning as China’s precipitously grows, in turn threatening US hegemony.

It therefore makes perfect sense for the US to construct a continent-spanning regime change army, which can be depended upon to take action in the most violent manner imaginable at a moment’s notice, should a government fail to act as required by Washington. This appears to have been the case in Guinea in September 2021, when a group of elite soldiers assumed control, imprisoning then-President Alpha Condé, suspending the constitution, closing the country’s borders, and freeing dozens of political prisoners.

Guinea had not long prior signed a deal with Beijing, enhancing China’s access to the country’s vast natural resources, which include aluminium, bauxite, iron, and more. Notably, Lieutenant-Colonel Mamady Doumbouya, Conakry’s new leader, was keen to assure Western investors at the time that their interests locally wouldn’t be adversely affected by his government’s policies.

Yet, the coup in Niger demonstrates that for all Flintlock’s success in dislodging troublesome governments, the operation is replete with a high – and perhaps constantly growing – risk of blowback. US-trained military officers have been involved in at least six coups in Burkina Faso and Mali since 2012. Governments in both countries are now engaged in dedicated efforts to purge their lands of any and all Western influence, and public sympathy for Western enemy states such as Russia is high and rising.

Image
Should Niger go the same way, Paris alone will lose its access to the country’s uranium, which by some estimates powers one in three lightbulbs across France. And the punitive reactions of the EU and US to the suggests the Western world more widely views the “National Council for the Safeguarding of the Country” as a dire threat to its interests not just in Niger, but the entire region.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... backfires/

******

Russia and the military putsch in Niger
August 2, 2023

This evening’s edition of Sixty Minutes offered an interesting perspective on the military putsch in Niger: that it followed directly from the principles of anti-colonialism which were the overriding theme of the just concluded Russia-Africa Summit in St Petersburg. What they did not say, but I will consider here, is whether there is more than just an idea nurtured in Russia to explain what is going on in Niger and its neighbors today. Is there a helping hand?

Let us recall that a military unit in Niger has placed the elected pro-Western president Mohamed Bazoum under house arrest. A purge of his supporters in the government is ongoing. Street demonstrations in the Niger capital are shown on Russian television denouncing the French. Some are carrying pro-Putin posters.

Meanwhile the leaders of the coup accuse the former colonial power France of plotting their overthrow. Export of uranium, the main strategic commodity that binds France to this country has been suspended.

Niger happens to represent 5% of the world’s supply of uranium and accounts for a much higher percentage, perhaps 50% of French needs for its nuclear power plants. This assumes a pan-European importance given the key position France occupies in Europe’s overall power generation from nuclear fuels. Although the French company operating the uranium mines insists it will stay on, that may be no more than brave words. French, German, American and other Western expatriates are now being evacuated from Niger.

On the news of the suspension of uranium exports, the global prices of raw uranium rose several percent. Western analysts have said that France and Europe have enough reserves of uranium to cover power generation needs in the short term. However, in the medium and long term that becomes more problematic. And the question bears on whether Europe can and will apply sanctions to the still un-sanctioned Russian uranium and nuclear rods for power generating stations.

A couple of days ago, the Economic Community of West African States, headed by Nigeria, demanded that the constitutional authorities be reinstated in Niger within a week, threatening to take action by force if necessary. This prompted Niger’s neighbors Mali and Burkina Faso to warn ECOWAS and any others considering intervening in Niger that they would come to the defense of the leaders of the putsch. The military forces of these two countries are not inconsiderable.

The Financial Times speaks of Mali and Burkino Faso from the ideological mindset of autocracy versus democracy: both countries, the FT reminds us, also have leaders who came to power by coup d’état. However, it is just a question of days before the FT sees what I do in front of our noses: both Mali and Burkino Faso have close relationships with Russia and are well attuned to the anti-colonial message coming from the Kremlin.

Mali has over the past year booted out French security forces and replaced them with Wagner Group mercenaries. Burkino Faso was named last week as one of the five neediest African countries which will receive between 25,000 and 50,000 tons of Russian wheat free of charge.

And so, while Russia may have puny economic investments and trade in Africa compared to Europe, it is hitting well above its weight in the geopolitical power game even now, before it implements its ambitious plans for Soft Power projection outlined at the Summit.

In closing, it is worth mentioning that Russian news today also speaks about the start of negotiations with several North African states which participated in the Summit to arrive at free trade agreements. And is Washington still hoping to isolate Russia? Those are purely delusional aspirations.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2023

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2023/08/02/ ... -in-niger/

******

French Invasion of Niger Could Turn into All-Out Franco-African War
Posted on August 3, 2023 by Yves Smith

Yves here. I am road testing the site InfoBrics with readers via this post on Niger. It has been sending me candidates for republication for a while. The site is up front about its editorial stance, not unlike some other sites from which publish content, such as openDemocracy and Common Dreams. I have found their articles too often to be a tad over-written, as in expressing opinion a bit too vividly, particularly when criticizing Collective West types. Not that the criticisms are not well-founded, but the painting in overly bright colors can undercut the message.

Please let me know what you think. Thanks!

By Drago Bosnic, independent geopolitical and military analyst. Originally published at InfoBrics


If Paris doesn’t intervene, the uprising in Niger could lead to a complete collapse of the neocolonial system it left in place in the 1960s. The dilemma inevitably results in a geopolitical catch-22, as leaving things as they are could also encourage others to revolt against Western neocolonialism elsewhere in Africa and possibly beyond.

Ever since the Nigerien military under the command of General Abdourahamane Tchiani took power on July 26, there has been an exponential increase in tensions between Niamey and its former colonial masters in Paris. This has gone to the point where France is now seriously considering invading the West African country. The exploitation of “former” French colonies has continued unabated for over half a century even after they were granted a semblance of independence and Paris has been the main beneficiary of this one-sided relationship. Combined with France’s inability to deal with various terrorist insurgencies in the region, this unadulterated neocolonial theft has been the primary reason behind a series of popular uprisings in the Sahel.

Paris is now faced with a strategic dilemma. If it lets Niger continue its path toward actual independence, France will be unable to continue exploiting the country’s natural resources. Namely, several of its former colonies have served as a source of massive wealth extraction and given the recent troubles Paris is facing, these resources might be more important than ever. On the other hand, recent geopolitical changes in the area have left France largely impuissant. After the defeat of its nearly decade-long intervention in Chad last year, Paris has been left with bases in Ivory Coast, Senegal and Gabon. Neither of these can be used effectively as a staging ground for an invasion due to the limited number of troops stationed there.

However, even if France was to somehow find enough soldiers to launch the invasion, none of the three countries border Niger. Gabon is the least logical option, as Cameroon and Nigeria stand between it and Niger, leaving only bases in Senegal and Ivory Coast as viable possibilities. And yet, this is where the issues of basic geography for Paris stop and actual geopolitical ones start. Namely, in order to effectively use its forces from both countries to reach Niger, France needs to go through Mali and Burkina Faso, both of which have already stated that any military action against Niamey will be tantamount to aggression against them. In other words, if France wants to attack Niger, it will also need to attack two more African countries.

A possible alternative for Paris could be the use of its neocolonial influence in the ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States, also known as CEDEAO in French and Portuguese). However, this leaves its members at risk of more anti-Western uprisings, as the belligerent power pole is deeply unpopular in the area. Some members of the ECOWAS, such as Nigeria, might be the best geographical option, but given the fact that Paris has little to no influence in Abuja, this is extremely unlikely. Not to mention the fact that Nigeria has more than enough problems of its own and the last thing it needs is to serve as the staging ground for a neocolonial invasion. Logically, this leaves Chad as the only option, but this too is a very long shot.

To make matters worse for France, Algeria has joined the chorus of Niger’s allies. The French archrival that spearheaded the independence of many of its “former” colonies in the 1960s is effectively an African superpower, heavily armed and highly motivated to never allow Paris or any other Western (neo)colonial power to establish a firm foothold in the region. This still leaves Chad as the only viable option for an invasion, as the country was an instrumental staging ground for virtually all French military operations in the area, including the illegal invasion of Libya. However, reaching Chad at this point is easier said than done and this still leaves most of the geopolitical issues unresolved. Also, all geographical considerations remain.

Namely, the Nigerien capital of Niamey is located in the southwestern corner of the country, close to the border with Burkina Faso. Thus, even in the unlikely case that none of its neighbors intervene, Niger is still left with a comfortable window of opportunity to resist the invasion. This could end in a disaster for France, as yet another military defeat in the area would inevitably lead to a complete collapse of the neocolonial system it left in place in the 1960s. On the other hand, if Paris doesn’t intervene, this will happen anyway, albeit at a somewhat slower pace. Either way, the dilemma inevitably results in a geopolitical catch-22, as leaving things as they are could also encourage others to revolt against Western neocolonialism elsewhere in Africa and possibly beyond.

As for France’s NATO allies, they’ve been largely quiet and non-militant, including the United States (a rather uncommon feature in their usually belligerent foreign policy). Washington DC has a military base in the central part of the country, the Niger Air Base 201, run by US AFRICOM (African Command), but its operational capabilities are mostly limited to drone strikes, with the troops deployed there largely composed of a skeleton crew that provides basic security. Coupled with the recent cooling of US-French relations, this makes it highly unlikely that the Pentagon would give the go-ahead for any sort of American involvement in a possible French invasion, even though it’s in Washington DC’s interest to keep Western neocolonialism in Africa alive for as long as possible.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2023/08 ... n-war.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sat Aug 05, 2023 3:01 pm

Military junta in Niger revokes military agreements with France

Image
The military also revoked the powers of Niger's ambassadors to France, Nigeria, Togo and the United States. | Photo: TRT
Published 4 August 2023

The coup group made the decision before "France's dismissive attitude towards the situation in Niger."

The military junta that took power in Niger after the coup announced on Friday the revocation of the agreements previously signed with France in the field of defense.

"Given France's dismissive attitude towards the situation in Niger, the National Council for the Defense of the Fatherland has decided to revoke the security and defense cooperation agreements with this country," the rebels said in a statement.

Similarly, the military revoked the powers of the extraordinary and plenipotentiary ambassadors of the Republic of Niger to France, Nigeria, Togo and the United States.


In turn, the coup junta stressed that it would respond "immediately" if an aggression or attempted aggression were carried out against the nation by the Economic Community of West African States (Cedeao).

This statement comes after ECOWAS set a three-day ultimatum for the return of constitutional order, which has been supported by the US and several African countries such as Senegal.


The ousted president, Mohamed Bazoum, requested through a publication in the US media Washington Post the intervention of the White House and the international community to restore democracy.

"At this difficult time, I urge the US government and the entire international community to help us restore constitutional order. The people of Niger will never forget their support at this pivotal moment in our history," he said.

Last week, a group of soldiers, who formed the self-styled National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland (CNSP), removed the president-elect in 2021, as part of the first democratic transition in the African nation since its independence in 1960.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/niger-go ... -0005.html

Google Translator

*****

African States Support Nigerien Sovereignty in the Face of Imperialist Attack and Collusion of Stooge African Governments
Governments of Burkina Faso, Mali and Guinea 02 Aug 2023

Image
ECOWAS States

Reaction to the coup in Niger is a litmus test which determines who is truly supportive of self-determination for African nations. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is urging Nigeria to invade neighboring Niger, which is just what the U.S. and France would like to see happen. But the leaders of Burkina Faso, Guinea, and Mali are standing firm and demanding that the people of Niger, who appear to be supportive of the military involvement in their country, resolve their own conflict without the intervention of imperialist western nations. The leaders of Mali and Burkina Faso announced a joint statement, and were joined by the president of Guinea in upholding sovereignty and Pan-African unity.

Joint Communique #001 of Burkina Faso and the Republic of Mali

The transition governments of Burkina Faso and Mali have learned through the press of the conclusion of the extraordinary summits of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and of the West African Economic and Monetary Union held on July 30, 2023 in Abuja over the political situation in Niger.

The Transition Governments of Burkina Faso and Mali:

1. Express their fraternal solidarity and the solidarity in brotherhood of the Burkinabe and Malian people with the people of Niger who has decided, responsibly, to take its destiny into its own hand and to be accountable in the face of history for complete sovereignty;

2. Denounce the persistence of these regional organizations to impose sanctions that increase the populations’ suffering and imperil the spirit of Panafricanism.

3. Refuse to apply those illegal, illegitimate, and inhumane sanctions against the Nigerien people and authorities.

4. Warn that any military intervention against Niger would mean a declaration of war against Burkina Faso and Mali.

5. Inform that any military intervention against Niger will lead to a withdrawal of Burkina Faso and Mali from ECOWAS as well as to the implementation of legitimate self-defense in support of the armed forces and people of Niger.

6. Warn against the disastrous consequences of a military intervention in Niger that might destabilize the whole region like that of the unilateral intervention of NATO in Libya, which has been the cause of the spread of terrorism in the Sahel region and in West Africa.

The Transition Governments of Burkina Faso and Mali are deeply outraged and surprised by the unevenness observed between, on the one hand the speed and adventurous attitude of certain political representatives of West Africa wishing to use the armed forces to restore a constitutional order in a sovereign country and on the other, the inaction, the indifference and passive complicity of these political representatives to help states and people victims of terrorism for decades and left to their own fate.

In any case, the Transition Governments of Burkina Faso and Mali invites all living forces to be ready and to be mobilized, in anticipation of supporting the Nigerien people in those dark hours of Panafricanism.

May God Bless Africa and protect Africans!

Written in Ouagadougou and Bamako, July 31st, 2023.

Signed by Rimtalba Jean Emmanuel Ouedraogo and Colonel Abdoulaye Maiga


Statement from Guinea

Following the events in Niger, the National Committee of the Rally for Development (CNRD) firmly expressed its support for the people of this friendly country, emphasizing the importance of the values ​​of Pan-Africanism dear to the Head of State, Colonel Mamadi DOUMBOUYA. Consequently, the authorities of the Republic of GUINEA dissociate themselves from the sanctions imposed by ECOWAS.

Communique No 002/CNRD/2023

Since July 26, 2023 the people of Guinea led by the National Committee for the Rally for Development (CNRD) have followed with great interest the evolution of the socio-political situation in the sister Republic of Niger which led to the taking of responsibility by the National Council for the Safeguarding of the Country (CNSP).

The Guinean authorities pay tribute to the brave people of Niger for their exemplary patriotism and salute the republican spirit and the maturity of their defense and security forces that have prioritized the best interests of their nation by choosing to come together to find solutions to Nigerien problems.

The CNRD remains convinced that the new authorities will make every effort to guarantee the stability and harmony in Niger and in the sub-region.

The sanctions measures recommended by ECOWAS, including military intervention, are options that cannot be a solution to the current problem but would lead to a human disaster whose consequences could go beyond the borders of Niger.

Consequently, the CNRD refrains from applying these illegitimate and inhuman against the brotherly people and authorities of Niger and urges ECOWAS to return to better thinking.

The Republic of Guinea reaffirms with this press release its pan-Africanist vision by bringing its solidarity with the people of Niger and by the new authorities of the CNSP to preserve the national unity and cohesion.

The CNRD emphasizes that any military intervention against Niger would de facto lead to the dislocation of ECOWAS. Similarly, the brotherly peoples of Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Guinea yearns for more recognition and respect for our sovereignty.

Furthermore, the CNRD would like to point out that the sanctions imposed and the threats made at the summit of July 30, 2023 do not in any way make a commitment upon the Republic of Guinea.

At a time when the young populations of the ECOWAS region are experiencing a human drama in Tunisia and in the Mediterranean, the concern of the leaders of the sub-region should be rather oriented towards the strategic social and economic issues for the realization of their aspirations, rather than focus on the fate of deposed Presidents.

Conakry
July 31 2023
For the National Rally for Development
Brigadier General
Ibrahim Bangoura

https://blackagendareport.com/african-s ... ge-african

******

Niger Junta Suspends Military Agreements With France

Image
Niger's military forces declared last week that the country's soldiers had overthrown President Mohamed Bazoum. Aug. 4, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@mjaccob165883

Published 4 August 2023 (16 hours 12 minutes ago)

Ousted President Mohamed Bazoum has appealed to the international community for help, while the CNSP has refused to return power and has threatened to respond to force with force.


Following the July 26 coup d'état, Niger's military junta announced the suspension of military cooperation agreements previously signed with France in the field of defense.

The National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland (CNSP), a governing body set up by the military after the coup, said in a statement that it is revoking five cooperation agreements signed by the two countries between 1997 and 2020 in the field of security and defense.

This comes "in the face of France's dismissive attitude towards Niger's internal situation," the junta said. The military signed as well a decree to terminate the mandates of Niger's ambassadors to four countries - France, the United States, Nigeria and Togo.

The CNSP has also decided to halt the operations of France 24 and Radio France Internationale, the two French state-owned international media outlets, in the African country.


Niger's military forces declared last week that the country's soldiers had overthrown President Mohamed Bazoum, who was being held hostage. Abdourahamane Tchiani, former head of Niger's presidential guard, was appointed president of the CNSP. The constitution was thus suspended and Bazoum's government was dissolved.

The Economic Community of West African States (Ecowas) has set a three-day deadline as an ultimatum for the restoration of constitutional order; otherwise, it would resort to force. This measure has been supported by the U.S. and several African countries, including Senegal.

In the midst of such scenario, the ousted president, requested through a publication in the Washington Post the intervention of the White House and the international community to reestablish democracy.

Bazoum said that the coup, launched against his government by a faction of the army, has no justification, and that if it succeeds, "it will have devastating consequences for our country, our region and the entire world."

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Nig ... -0020.html

******

The West Wants Nigeria To Invade Its Northern Neighbor
AUGUST 4, 2023

Image

By Andrew Korybko – Jul 31, 2023

It’s expected that maximum pressure will be exerted on Nigeria by the West behind the scenes over the coming week ahead of ECOWAS’ ultimatum expiring. France and the US recognize the threat that the patriotic military coup in Niger poses to their hegemonic interests, which is why they’re ready to pull out all the stops in reversing this possibly game-changing development. For all its potential, Nigeria has largely failed to liberate itself from Western influence, hence why it’s likely to do their bidding.

Last week’s military coup in Niger could be a game-changer in the New Cold War if the junta cuts off the uranium exports upon which France’s nuclear energy industry depends, kicks out its former colonizer’s troops from their last regional bastion, and/or requests Russia’s “Democratic Security” assistance. Unlike the patriotic military coups in Guinea, Mali, and Burkina Faso, which were condemned by the West but not considered a threat to its neocolonial stranglehold over Africa, the one in Niger is ringing alarm bells.

France and the US strongly condemned this latest regime change, with the first suspending all aid in parallel with the EU while the latter is preparing to follow suit. The African Union (AU) gave the Nigerien junta a 15-day ultimatum on Sunday to reinstall ousted President Mohamed Bazoum or risk “punitive measures”. This ominous threat was then echoed by the “Economic Community Of West African States” (ECOWAS), which said that the “use of force” might be employed if this doesn’t happen within a week.

The Nigerien junta’s spokesman foresaw this scenario and warned before their meetings that “The objective of the [ECOWAS] meeting is to approve a plan of aggression against Niger through an imminent military intervention in Niamey in collaboration with other African countries that are non-members of ECOWAS, and certain Western countries. We want to once more remind ECOWAS or any other adventurer of our firm determination to defend our homeland.”

Interim Burkinabe President Ibrahim Traore lambasted many of his peers as imperialist puppets in his speech at the second Russia-Africa Summit in St. Petersburg several days prior for doing the West’s bidding in opposing patriotic military coups such as the one that catapulted him to power last October. His words were timely in light of the AU-ECOWAS threats that made soon thereafter against the neighboring Nigerien junta, which proved that they’re functioning as the West’s regional proxies.

Amidst these rising tensions, Chadian Interim President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno traveled to the Nigerien capital of Niamey on Sunday to hold talks with the junta, though it’s unclear at the time of this analysis’ publication what the outcome was. His country is a regional military powerhouse whose armed forces could potentially participate in any operation that ECOWAS launches against Niger despite not being a member of that bloc. At the same time, however, there are reasons why it might not do so.

This traditional French ally failed to fall for the US’ information warfare provocation earlier this year falsely claiming that Russia was plotting to kill its interim leader. Instead of expelling that country’s ambassador, it kicked the German one out instead after discovering that he was trying to stir up Color Revolution unrest. Shortly after, “Bloomberg Demanded That Biden Meddle In Chad On The Pretext Of Averting A Sudanese Scenario”. Accordingly, Chad might nowadays be reluctant to do the West’s bidding.

Its unexpected multipolar drift in recent months, which most recently saw the Chadian Foreign Minister travel to Russia for last week’s summit in defiance of intense Western pressure upon his country to boycott the event, could explain why its President is leading diplomatic efforts to defuse this latest crisis. At the same time, however, it still can’t be ruled out that Western pressure might prove too much and Chad is ultimately coerced into participating in a potential ECOWAS invasion of neighboring Niger.

Regardless of whatever role Chad may or may not play in that scenario, nothing can realistically happen unless Nigeria agrees to lead the invasion. Although ECOWAS-member Benin is a bit closer to Niamey than Nigeria is, the latter shares a much longer border with Niger and has a stronger military by far. Newly inaugurated President Bola Tinubu must therefore decide whether to do the West’s bidding in overthrowing his northern neighbor’s junta, which is the most important variable in this scenario.

It’s expected that maximum pressure will be exerted on Nigeria by the West behind the scenes over the coming week ahead of ECOWAS’ ultimatum expiring. France and the US recognize the threat that the patriotic military coup in Niger poses to their hegemonic interests, which is why they’re ready to pull out all the stops in reversing this possibly game-changing development. For all its potential, Nigeria has largely failed to liberate itself from Western influence, hence why it’s likely to do their bidding.

The armed forces and economic elite remain closely connected to that de facto New Cold War bloc. The first are trained by the West while the second got rich through their ties with it, and both of their top representatives regularly vacation there and send their kids to school in those countries. All that the West has to do is threaten to put an end to these relationships, which can then get its proxies to spring into action doing what’s needed to prepare Nigeria for leading ECOWAS’ possible invasion of Niger.

President Tinubu is considered to be a Western-friendly leader so it’s unlikely that he’d personally be against this anyhow, but even on the off chance that he wanted to defy the West, he’s powerless to resist his Western-influenced military. He’s only been in office for a few months, plus the Nigerian military has traditionally exerted disproportionate influence in shaping policy. These factors combine to make it a fait accompli that Nigeria will play the role that the West expects of it in the Nigerien crisis.

Unless President Deby succeeds in brokering a compromise that’s acceptable to France and the US, which isn’t likely but also isn’t impossible either, then there’s a very high chance that Nigeria will lead ECOWAS’ threatened invasion of Niger. Sunday’s large-scale anti-French and pro-coup rallies in Niamey show that this country’s latest regime change is genuinely popular with its people, thus suggesting that the external reimposition of President Bazoum’s despised regime could be met with resistance.

This observation doesn’t mean that the probable Nigerian-led ECOWAS invasion won’t succeed in its goal of reversing the coup, but just that it’ll require a lot of effort to sustain and might lead to the bloc being tasked by its Western overlord with carrying out a prolonged occupation. In that scenario, the Nigerien people would suffer under what could become one of the world’s worst neocolonial dictatorships, with France and the US making an example out of their country to deter patriotic military coups elsewhere.

https://orinocotribune.com/the-west-wan ... -neighbor/

******

Retribution for years of cruelty
August 4, 23:33

Image

Friend Recep decided to stick a scimitar in the back of Macron, supporting the military coup in Niger.

The cessation of the supply of uranium from Niger to France can be considered retribution for many years of injustice by Paris towards Africans. Of course, France is not doing this for the first time, what they did in Algeria, Rwanda and Mali is known in world history. Africans know this well. Now, the supply of gold and uranium to France from Niger has been completely suspended. This is a retribution for the years of cruelty against these countries "(c) Erdogan

PS. The French, meanwhile, continue to yell that the Niger authorities allegedly have already concluded an agreement with the Wagner PMC and that they are not going to leave Niger, even despite the break in agreements on deployment French troops in this country.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8544986.html

Google Translator

******

From periphery to priority: Africa as a key arena for Russia's ambitions

Last week’s Russia-Africa summit highlighted their shared interest to cooperate against western dominance. While Moscow leads the fight, Africans are eager to play a role in shaping the new multipolar order.


Mohamad Hasan Sweidan
AUG 2, 2023

Image
Photo Credit: The Cradle

Since the start of this year, Russia has shown a remarkable commitment to engaging with Africa, with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov making three visits to the continent. These diplomatic efforts underscore the increasing importance Moscow places on cooperation with African countries.
This was expressed by Russian President Vladimir Putin in his recent article published on the Kremlin website on 24 July under the title "Russia and Africa: Joining efforts for peace, progress and a successful future" where he stated:
“We highly value the honestly-gained capital of friendship and cooperation, traditions of trust, and mutual support that Russia and African countries share. We are brought together by a common desire to shape a system of relations based on the priority of international law, respect for national interests, indivisibility of security, and recognition of the central coordinating role of the United Nations.”
The response from African countries has been unprecedented, particularly evident at the second Russia-Africa summit held on 27-28 July. An astounding 49 out of 54 African nations actively participated in the summit, indicating a significant development in the relations between the two parties.

Russian interests in Africa

This heightened engagement comes in spite of the war in Ukraine, which reshaped the geopolitical landscape and emphasized the importance of expanding cooperation with Africa amidst the global competition for positions and influence.

The Russian Foreign Policy Concept, issued in late March, recognized the importance of “strengthening and deepening Russian-African cooperation in various spheres on a bilateral and multilateral basis.”

What makes Moscow’s outreach particularly noteworthy is that it extends beyond countries with immediate strategic interests or abundant resources. Notably, Russia has reached out to smaller African states, such as Eswatini, highlighting its intent to strengthen its influence and build a positive image across the entire continent.

The African response to Russia's calls for closer ties has grown substantially. The Second International Parliamentary Conference "Russia-Africa" saw an increased participation of 40 delegations from African countries in March 2023, compared to 36 delegations in the previous conference held in 2019.

Similarly, the second Russia-Africa summit witnessed the attendance of 49 African nations in July, compared to 43 countries in the inaugural summit in 2019.

These developments are especially significant as African countries face mounting pressure from western powers to cut ties with Moscow due to the conflict in Ukraine. According to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, western states, particularly the US and France, were exerting “unprecedented pressure” on African countries ahead of the Russia-Africa summit in St Petersburg.

Aid and Trade

Trade exchange between Russia and Africa increased between 2020 and 2022, after the first Russia-Africa summit, increasing from $14 billion to $18 billion, and is expected to double in 2030. While Russia's trade with continental Africa is still relatively modest, four countries stand out as crucial partners: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, and South Africa, accounting for 70 percent of the total trade.



Image
Africa's top trade partners

Despite being at the bottom of Africa's list of trading partners and contributing only 1 percent of foreign direct investment to the continent, Russia's Africa policy is evolving rapidly. The Kremlin has recognized the increasing importance of Africa and sought new partnerships globally while deepening existing cooperation in the face of massive western sanctions.

One significant effort by Russia to strengthen ties with Africa is its commitment to education. In 2023, Russia offered a record 4,700 scholarships to African students, a considerable increase from the 1,900 scholarships awarded in 2019.

Furthermore, Russia has emerged as the top arms supplier to Africa, accounting for 44 percent of major arms imports to the region between 2017 and 2021. This dominance surpasses other major players like the US (17 percent), China (10 percent), and France (6.1 percent).

Image
Russian presence in Africa

At the recent Russia-Africa summit, President Putin emphasized Russia's commitment to military-technical cooperation by signing agreements with over 40 African countries and providing them with various weapons and equipment. Some of these deals even involved providing aid free of charge, demonstrating Russia's commitment to supporting African nations in their fight against terrorism.

Breaking free from neocolonial exploitation

In today's rapid geopolitical transformations, Africa has emerged as an arena for competing major powers. Amidst this struggle for influence, Russia and African countries have found common ground in their shared interest to cooperate against western dominance.
Moscow positions itself as a leader of the anti-western resistance, while African states see an opportunity to break free from the shackles of western colonialism and assert their voices in shaping the new multipolar order.

To understand the dynamics of the current Russian-African relationship, historical context is essential. The legacy of western colonial policies remains a pivotal element in the cooperation between Moscow and African states.

Many African countries identify with Russia's vision of a multipolar world, seeking a more equitable presence in global affairs. Russia deftly capitalizes on this anti-colonial sentiment, presenting itself as an attractive partner aligned with the interests of the Global South, particularly Africa.

Recent Russia-Africa summits have provided a platform for Moscow and its African partners to criticize the west openly. Leaders like Burkina Faso's Brahim Traoré used strong anti-colonial rhetoric to emphasize the need to break free from neocolonial exploitation and resource extraction.

In addition to rhetoric, Russia backs its words with action. At the summit, President Putin canceled $23 billion of African debt and pledged increased Russian investment in the continent. Moscow also highlighted its commitment to African food security, contrasting western practices that prioritize developed countries over developing ones.

UN data shows that 45 percent of food exports from Ukraine, exported under the Black Sea Grain Initiative signed between Russia, Ukraine, the UN, and Turkiye, went to developed countries, compared to 49 percent to developing countries.

Only 6 percent of these exports went to the least developed countries, including African countries, the equivalent of approximately 1.4 million tons. Last year, Russia exported 11.5 million tons of cereal to Africa, and nearly another 10 million tons were delivered in the first half of 2023.

Seeking collaborative partnerships

The report from the Munich Security Conference in February highlighted a troubling trend for the west:
“Many countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America have steadily lost faith in the legitimacy and fairness of an international system which has neither granted them an appropriate voice in global affairs, nor sufficiently addressed their core concerns. To many states, these failures are deeply tied to the west. They find that the western-led order has been characterized by post-colonial domination, double standards, and neglect for developing countries' concerns.”

As a result, countries in the region are seeking new partners who will approach the relationship as a collaboration rather than a zero-sum game. They have found an appealing alternative in Russia's engagement, particularly in President Putin's rhetoric advocating for a fair representation of African countries in international forums like the UN Security Council and G20. Furthermore, Moscow’s commitment to reform global financial and trade institutions to better serve African interests has resonated with these nations, setting the stage for deeper cooperation.

The growing discontent with the western-led system and the allure of alternative partnerships have helped to forge closer ties between the Kremlin and many of Africa’s leaders. This may explain recent events in Niger and before that in Mali, where military coups have redirected the country's foreign policy away from the west and, in particular former colonial ruler France.

Gaining ground in the Global South

The support of some African countries, such as Burkina Faso, Mali, and Guinea, for the coup in Niger, can be seen as a message of support for expelling the long-standing French influence and presence there.

In Russian geopolitical thought, Africa has become a region of increased importance and opportunity, necessitating stronger cooperation and multifaceted relations. Moscow’s approach to the African continent is built on three main pillars: enhancing influence through cooperation, emphasizing its leading position among anti-western countries, and investing in the region's abundant resources.

Russia recognizes that the prevailing anti-western sentiment in Africa provides a unique opening to build alliances and advance the cause of liberation from colonial legacies. The ongoing conflict between Russia and the west extends beyond the confines of Ukraine and is now unfolding in various regions, including Africa.

President Putin has skillfully positioned himself as a leader of the resistance against western influence, effectively resonating with many countries in the Global South, including Africa. By aligning itself with Africa's desire to break free from historical western dominance and colonial influences, Russia has gained significant ground.

http://thecradle-main.oss-eu-central-1. ... 2c055.jpeg

******

Image

Russia helped Africa reach these anti-imperialist victories. The western left was wrong to disavow it.

BY RAINER SHEA
AUGUST 2, 2023

Above: supporters of Captain Ibrahim Traoré

It’s no coincidence that multiple African countries have begun to carry out unprecedented measures towards breaking from neo-colonial control at the same time when American power has been seeing an acceleration in its decline. At a time when we’re two decades into the process of realignment of global power which started in the 2000s; where the world’s anti-imperialist forces began to regain their strength, while Washington’s criminal actions brought upon it compounding self-destructive consequences.

And when it comes to Russia’s role within this series of progressive victories, there’s a reality that Marxists need to recognize amid the recent events in Africa: even though Africa absolutely could have come to be able to start expelling the imperialists if not for Russia’s assistance, Russia’s efforts to defy the hegemon have tangibly contributed to the events that led to this outcome. Many smaller actions made this great triumph possible, and if Russia has been behind any number of them, it deserves credit.

There’s a reason why the supporters of Burkina Faso’s anti-imperialist president Traoré have been displaying the red, white, and blue, except not in the form of the U.S. flag but rather the Russian flag: due to internal popular pressure upon Russia’s bourgeois government, post-Soviet Russia has been continuing its predecessor’s tradition of aiding those seeking freedom from colonial rule. It’s thereby been embodying the virtuous liberatory spirit which those colors are supposed to represent. The members of Burkina Faso’s anti-imperialist movement have demonstrated love for Russia not only because of Russia’s deciding to strike back against imperialist crimes within Europe; but also because of Russia’s providing their own country, and other formerly colonized countries, with the tools for fighting off U.S.-created terrorists.

Associated Press wrote this spring about the country’s pivot away from dependence on France, and towards partnership with Russia: “The anti-French sentiment coincides with increasing Russian support, including demonstrations in the capital, Ouagadougou, where hundreds of protesters have waved Russian flags. France has had troops in West Africa’s Sahel region since 2013 when it helped drive Islamic extremists from power in northern Mali. But it’s facing growing pushback from populations who say France’s military presence has yielded little results as jihadi attacks are escalating. Burkina Faso’s junta says it has nothing against France but wants to diversify its military partners in its fight against the extremists and, notably, has turned to Russia.” In response, the hegemon’s narrative managers have been working to try to portray Russia’s assistance to countries like Burkina Faso as an overall negative; and the western left has been inclined to accept this backward view of these developments.

In the same report, AP repeats the accusations made against Russia’s military contractors by the U.S. government, the EU, the American-controlled UN, and the rights groups that have a financial incentive to appease these entities. When you look at the strongest “evidence” that these groups have used to “expose” the supposed crimes of the Russian mercenaries, you see propaganda tactics similar to the ones in which “China watchers” shared satellite images of buildings within Xinjiang that “proved” Uyghur concentration camps existed. It’s easy to find an image of explosions happening, and easier to attach words to it claiming it depicts innocents being slaughtered; it’s harder to produce more veracious evidence for these claims, the kinds that American whistleblowers have been able to give of the U.S. military committing war crimes.

Then there’s the question these charges beg: why would these countries keep requesting that Russian contractors assist them if these contractors have been undeniably proven to be menaces towards civilian citizens? This story is too convenient for the imperialists, too good of a reason for them to declare: “see? You should have remained colonies of ours, instead of trying to get help from our rivals!” The truth is that Russia has been providing these countries with the means to attain civil stability, amid attempts by the imperialists to dominate and destabilize them via neo-colonial occupation tools such as AFRICOM.

Perhaps the most meaningful way that Russia has furthered Burkina Faso’s journey towards becoming a fearless fighter of empire, though, has simply been the inspiration it’s provided the country’s anti-imperialist movement. (The equivalent applies to Mali, which has joined Burkina Faso in defying the imperialists.) The pro-Russia demonstrations have represented a galvanization of popular will towards defying the colonizers, expanding revolutionary consciousness throughout the people by making the anti-imperialist struggle more visible. Russia’s Operation Z is showing the formerly colonized world a demonstrable example of a country which used to be a U.S. client state successfully working to weaken the hegemon. When freedom fighters know they have strong allies, and know these allies are winning their fights against the oppressors, the morale that they need in order to win becomes more abundant. The same thing has been happening with the communists in the heart of imperialism who’ve taken the pro-Russia stance, and thereby become ideologically motivated to build an anti-imperialist movement which seriously threatens our ruling institutions.

The predominant elements of the western left, though, have in effect rejected this encouragement that comes from aligning with the most powerful anti-hegemonic forces. This is because these elements have a purity fetish, where essentially no real progress is viewed as worth celebrating or learning from due to this progress not being pure enough. In The Purity Fetish and the Crisis of Western Marxism, the communist Carlos Garrido explains the features of this mentality:

The purity fetish, I will argue, is an integral component of the Western metaphysical outlook, an outlook which which concretizes itself in a variety of ways throughout history, but which sustains, with very few exceptions, key philosophical assumptions traceable to Parmenidean metaphysics. In the US left this can be found in three major areas, all of which prevent both the acquisition of truth and the development of socialist movement: 1) in the assessment of socialist (and non-socialist but anti-imperialist) struggles abroad, where the phenomenon Max Scheler (elaborated from Nitezsche) calls ressentiment is indubitably present; 2) in the assessment of the diverse character of the working class at home; and 3) in their national nihilistic assessment of US history. In each of these areas, the purity fetish limits their judgment to being at best one-sided and fetters their practical efforts to develop the subjective factor in the working masses.

These beliefs reinforce each other. Because modern U.S. leftist has only seen failure for revolutionary politics within their lifetime, they forget the history of successful progressive struggles by the people in their country. Because they have this nihilistic assessment of their people’s past, they view the people within their own conditions as fundamentally reactionary, and therefore untrustworthy as potential revolutionary allies. Because of this alienation from the people, they view America as exceptional, in that this is essentially the only place where consistently promoting solidarity with anti-imperialist struggles (such as Russia’s) wouldn’t be an effective tactic.

Because of this impulse to compromise on anti-imperialism, they adopt certain rationales; rationales that make it seem justifiable to break from the view of anti-imperialism shared by existing socialist states (like the DPRK, which has voiced support for Russia) and by Global South movements. They reject Kim Il Sung’s conclusion that the contradictions within the forces opposing imperialism are the secondary issue, becoming too fixated on these contradictions to be able to effectively contribute to the anti-imperialist cause.

Garrido writes that the purity fetish comes from an impotency within the western left, because “broiling in this impotency envy develops into ressentiment: the success in the East, because it has been impure, is deemed a failure in the West, because purity has been sustained, is deemed a success. It is a topsy-turvy world which the Western Marxist sees.”

The consequence is that these leftists and “Marxists” come to a detached, infantile view of the conflicts between imperialist and anti-imperialist forces, even when the imperialist side in these conflicts is clearly fascist in character. Garrido writes of Zizek and his pro-NATO, anti-Cuba stance: “he ignores that the Donbass people had been asking for Russian aid since they began getting attacked in 2014, and that the communist parties of the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Donetsk and Lugansk, the most progressive forces in the region, were the ones who first called for Russian aid…Cuba is too ‘impure’ to support, they don’t measure up to his pure socialism; however, the US, NATO, and the Nazi friendly fascist state of Ukraine are not ‘impure’ enough to support against the Russian menace, a ‘menace’ which is supported by the former colonized countries (those without US puppet governments at least) and by the contemporary socialist camp.”

There’s a deeper reason behind why the purity fetish exists. Behind why it’s now driving western Marxists to react to the events in Africa by cheering one contributor to this victory (the African progressive forces) while disavowing another (Russia); or worse by dismissing not just Russia, but also the other great African revolutionary ally China, and even the African progressives themselves. The reason is that these leftists, being in the heart of imperialism, are sheltered. They haven’t sufficiently experienced the practical realities of fighting a vastly superior enemy. They could experience these realities if they wanted to, but that would require them giving up the purity fetish which has kept American radicalism ineffectual since the U.S. communist movement got destroyed and co-opted. It would require them adopting a serious anti-imperialist practice, and then becoming a major target of the state; such as orgs like the African People’s Socialist Party have after deciding to consistently fight the Ukraine psyop.

The effect of this liberal tailist attitude is to render the left insular, uninterested in doing anything that could bring one out the movement and into the masses. Therefore even if an American leftist has invested themselves in the most radical parts of the domestic struggle, they undermine their own cause should they neglect the international struggle; you can only become an effective revolutionary, one that can reach the people, when you’ve given up the liberal tailist stances that keep you isolated to “left” circles. Staying limited to these circles is a willful embrace of the detached role that the communist Jay Tharappel has observed the western left inhabits:

To justify empire building, colonising cultures produce racism of two kinds, one which justifies conquest on the grounds of naked national self-interest, and another which justifies conquest by claiming to ‘civilise’ conquered nations and ‘save’ them from ‘despots’, and ‘evil dictators’ (a saviour complex). Anti-Stalinism is comparable with the latter kind in the sense that it encourages its followers to believe they’re on the side of The People ™ but who are these people exactly? In the Syrian war, Anti-Stalinists today support the overthrow of President Assad’s government by “the people” while also claiming to oppose the actual armed militias that make up the actual people that are attempting that overthrow. “The people” who “rise up” against a “brutal dictator” demanding “freedom and democracy” has become the Anti-Stalinist chorus over the past decade, one accompanied by imagery of homogenous mobs of poor oppressed victims bullied into submission by a cartoonishly evil ‘oppressive’ ‘brutal’ ‘tyrant’, be it Stalin, Mao, Gaddafi, or Assad – all spinoffs of the ‘Stalinist’ caricature projected by Anti-Stalinists…Inability to think in a logical and consequential manner is why Anti-Stalinists often forget they have the privilege of living in a state that isn’t threatened by other states, this includes Anarchists.

Nations that establish their dominance can afford to be more liberal especially if they’re not threatened by more powerful enemies, whereas countries that find themselves actively fending off aggression by more powerful enemies do not have the luxury of adhering to ‘liberal’ standards premised on a privileged place in global affairs. It’s a hard pill to swallow, but many of the ‘liberal’ freedoms Anti-Stalinists take for granted at home are founded upon a history of being the colonial masters abroad, and not solely due to domestic struggles. Inheriting the memory of an arrogant colonising culture, the first–world Left in general has the weakest historic memory of having fought off a foreign colonial power compared to the socialist and postcolonial worlds against whom extreme genocidal levels of violence have been inflicted over the last several centuries.

It’s so easy for those within the safety of the imperial center to say that Russia shouldn’t have taken action in Ukraine, when their neighborhoods have never been threatened by a genocidal fascist invasion like the communities of the Donbass were last year. Or for them to minimize the historically progressive role that Russia has been having within the historically colonized countries, uncritically believing the atrocity propaganda and acting aghast about the great Wagner villain. Wagner isn’t the thing within these conflicts they should be focused on; they should be more concerned about ending the actually documented crimes of AFRICOM, and of the fascist U.S.-backed Ukrainian forces. Their perspectives would be different if they were to break from the safe, Democratic Party-adjacent “left” space which they’ve invested themselves in, and adopt the practice of groups like APSP.

That’s what makes the American left’s ongoing failures on anti-imperialism so inexcusable: to become serious about the cause, socialists in the United States wouldn’t even need to travel to Ukraine or Africa to join in on the battles there. All they would have to do is stop tailing the Democrats, join with a broad anti-imperialist coalition, and work to influence the discourse in a way which genuinely threatens the state. This means not disavowing the anti-imperialist actions of Russia or other countries simply because these countries have internal contradictions. To forsake solidarity with the Russian people’s struggle (and by extension the African people’s struggle) because reactionary coupists imposed capitalist restoration onto Russia is, in effect, to punish the global proletariat for having had a crime committed upon it.

It’s not the Russian people’s fault that they’re for now stuck with a bourgeois government, and it’s certainly not the fault of these revolutionary movement members across the Global South who’ve been flying this government’s flag. In the context of what these people are doing, and of how they’ve seen Russia advance their liberatory cause, displaying this flag makes sense. It would be chauvinistic, even racist in the way that Tharappel talks about, to try to invalidate their perspective by strawmanning any pro-Russian sentiment as necessarily being in suppor of Russia’s internal counterrevolution. As our class and geopolitical conflict keeps escalating, though, we’re more and more going to see the “left” political actors in imperialism’s heart embrace such chauvinism. We must reject these counterproductive attitudes, and instead embrace a project to build unity with the world’s anti-imperialist forces.

https://newswiththeory.com/russia-helpe ... isavow-it/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:45 pm

Niger Puts an End to Uranium and Gold Export to France
AUGUST 5, 2023

Image
This image from a video shows the collapse of a gold mine in the Maradi region's village of Dan Issa, Niger. Near the border with Nigeria, Sunday, Nov 7, 2021. Photo: AP.

With immediate effect, the Republic of Niger, under the leadership of new president General Abdourahamane Tchiani, and supported by the people of the country, announced the suspension of the export of uranium and gold to France on Sunday.

In parallel to the decision, protestors were surrounding the French Embassy in Niger calling for the end of French colonial practices repeating the slogan “Down with France!” and reaffirming their support to the coup leader, Tchiani.

Wazobia Reporters, a Nigerien news website,reported one protestor proclaiming “We have uranium, diamonds, gold, oil, and we live like slaves? We don’t need the French to keep us safe.”

Simultaneously the Nigerien coup leader has faced condemnations and threats from African governments that maintain ties with the European linked institutions such as the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the EU as well as the African Union. In that regard, Tchiani said, “We want to once more remind ECOWAS or any other adventurer of our firm determination to defend our homeland.”

It is also worth noting that Niger, according to the World Nuclear Association (WNA), is the world’s seventh-biggest producer of uranium. The WNA also confirms that Niger, in 2022, produced 2020 tU which would be considered just over 4% of world uranium output.

Currently, uranium production in Niger occurs mostly through a French majority-owned company called Orano which owns 63.4% of Société des Mines de l’Aïr (SOMAÏR). The remaining 36.66% of this is owned by Niger’s Société du Patrimoine des Mines du Niger, known as Sopamin.

In 2021, the European Union utilities purchased 2905 tU of Niger-produced uranium making Niger the leading uranium supplier vis-a-vis the EU.

Earlier, on July 28, Orano released a statement arguing that “the situation remains unstable” in Niger following the overthrowing of French ally and President of Niger Muhammed Bazoum. The company then added that it has “set up a crisis unit to prioritize the safety of its employees” and underscored that “this event to have any immediate impact on its activities in Niger or on the value of its assets.”

The coup in Niger follows a pattern of coups across the African continent such as Burkina Faso and Mali.

https://orinocotribune.com/niger-puts-a ... to-france/


******

Nigeria’s Senate refuses to support ECOWAS plan for West-backed military intervention

A day after ECOWAS chiefs of staffs finalized plans for a military intervention, Nigeria’s Senate refused to support President Bola Tinubu’s proposal to deploy soldiers. Tinubu is the current chair of ECOWAS. Meanwhile, Niger has seen multiple demonstrations in support of the coup that overthrew Mohamed Bazoum

August 05, 2023 by Pavan Kulkarni

Image
(Photo: via Africa View Facts/Twitter)

The regional bloc, Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), has drawn up a plan for a military invasion of Niger to restore the ousted Mohamed Bazoum to presidency. However, in Nigeria, whose president Bola Tinubu is the current chair of ECOWAS, the Senate has refused to support the military intervention.

On Saturday, August 5, at a closed-door executive session to deliberate on Tinubu’s letter seeking the Senate’s support for “military buildup and deployment of personnel for military intervention,” “almost all senators… totally ruled out the military options,” an unnamed senator told Premium Times.

Pointing out that “our military is highly ill-equipped and not prepared to fight any war,” the Senators argued that “the Federal Government should focus on solving the Boko Haram, banditry, and ESN/IPOB menaces… instead of contemplating going to war in a foreign country.”

The war plans were prepared at a meeting of the chiefs of staff of ECOWAS member countries which ended on Friday, August 4. “All the elements that will go into any eventual intervention have been worked out here, including the resources needed, the how and when we are going to deploy the force,” said Abdel Fatau Musah, ECOWAS Commissioner for Political affairs, Peace and Security.

Earlier on July 30, ECOWAS had threatened military invasion of Niger if its military junta, the National Council for the Safeguard of the Homeland (CNSP), did not restore Bazoum as the president by Sunday, August 6. He was ousted on July 26 in a popularly-welcomed coup by Gen. Abdourahmane Tchiani, who was the head of the Presidential Guard.

France, which has up to 1,500 troops in Niger, and the US, with another 1,100 troops in two bases, are both backing ECOWAS. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Thursday, August 3, “We strongly support the very strong leadership of ECOWAS on Niger.” White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby added that there was still “time and space” for diplomacy, but that “window is not going to be open forever.”

While the US President Joe Biden said that the “Nigerien people have the right to choose their leaders,” the “Nigerien people,” who perceive Bazoum as a corrupt puppet of France, have repeatedly mobilized in tens of thousands to support the coup.

Read: Thousands rally in support of Niger’s coup leaders as Western-backed ECOWAS threatens military intervention
A coalition of 14 trade union centers called the Unité d’Actions Syndicales du Niger (UAS-Niger), which had been demanding the withdrawal of French troops, has supported the coup and called on Nigeriens to rally behind the CNSP.

As Nigeriens celebrated the anniversary of its independence from France on August 3, the CNSP terminated five military agreements signed with France between 1977 and 2020, allowing the former colonizer to station up to 1,500 troops in the country.

Donning T-shirts with coup leader Tchiani’s image, thousands took to the streets once again that day, sloganeering “Down with France,” and demanding the withdrawal of its troops and other foreign forces, including those of Italy which has 300 soldiers and the European Union (EU) which has a smaller contingent.

The mass-demonstration was organized by the anti-imperialist M62 Movement, formed last year as a coalition of 15 civil society organizations which have been protesting against French deployment in the country for at least two years. One demonstrator said, “It is only security that interests us..[whether it is provided by] Russia, China, Turkey…We just don’t want the French who have been looting us since 1960.”

France, however, has refused to withdraw its troops, with its foreign ministry’s spokesperson Anne-Clair Legendre saying, “We don’t answer to the putschists. We recognize one constitutional order only, that of President Bazoum.”

Under detention by the army, Bazoum, who had instituted a crackdown on the anti-French movement in the country, wrote a column in the Washington Post on independence day, calling for US intervention to restore his power. A US warplane C-17A — which is “is capable of rapid strategic delivery of troops and all types of cargo to main operating bases or directly to forward bases in the deployment area” — arrived in Benin shortly after its government declared support to the military intervention.

In the meantime, as a part of ECOWAS sanctions, Nigeria has stopped electricity supply to Niger. While Niger’s high-grade uranium is used to power a third of the light bulbs in France, its own electrification rate is less than 18%. Up to 90% of its power is imported from Nigeria.

Difficult times
“The weeks and months to come will certainly be difficult for our country. Those who oppose us have no limits when it comes to defending their selfish interests. They will only stop in the face of the firm determination of the Nigerien people,” Tchiani said.

Suspending Niger’s diplomatic ties with France, the US, Nigeria, and Togo, also an ECOWAS country, Tchiani warned that “any aggression or attempted aggression against the State of Niger will see an immediate and unannounced response from the Niger Defense and Security Forces.”

Mali, Burkina Faso and Guinea — three other suspended members of ECOWAS, sanctioned after similar popularly-supported coups — have expressed support to Niger. Together, they make up nearly 60% of the total land-area of ECOWAS countries. Mali and Burkina Faso, whose military juntas ordered the French troops out of their countries after taking power, have said they will mobilize their forces in defense of Niger if it is attacked.

The Vice-President of the CNSP, Lt. Gen. Salifou Mody, traveled to Mali and met its president, Colonel Assimi Goita. He also held a meeting with “someone from Wagner” while in Mali, AP reported. Mody also met with Burkina Faso’s leader, Captain Ibrahim Traore, and spoke about ECOWAS.

“We spoke precisely about this situation because we would not like Niger to become the new Libya,” Mody said, adding that they have decided to “undertake a number of activities to be able to deal with the situation.”

Ivory Coast, Benin, and Senegal have pledged to send troops for the ECOWAS invasion. Chad, whose president also took power in a coup but remained in the West’s good books, not having demanded the withdrawal of French troops, has refused to take part in the military intervention.

While supporting the call for restoration of Bazoum, Niger’s northern neighbor Algeria, has opposed “foreign military intervention,” which it said will “only complicate and exacerbate the current crisis.” Russia had also called for the restoration of constitutional order, but opposed military intervention.

Peoples’ movements across West Africa and other parts of the continent have opposed military intervention, and called for the withdrawal of all foreign bases in Niger and other countries of the region.

Read: People’s movements oppose West-backed military intervention by ECOWAS in Niger
In a statement on August 4, the Workers Democratic Way party in Morocco expressed its “strong rejection and condemnation of the imperialist threats, especially from the French, of direct military intervention or through its puppet regimes in the region against Niger,” adding that “a war could ignite the entire region, leaving behind destruction, loss of lives, and horrific tragedies.” The Party further affirmed “the right of the Nigerien people to self-determination away from foreign interference.”

The Communist Party of Kenya condemned foreign military bases in Africa, which serve “as instruments of imperialistic control.” The party added that the “presence of these military bases deepens historical wounds of colonization and reinforces the oppressive grip of foreign powers. We call for the immediate dismantling of all foreign military bases in Africa to protect our dignity and freedom.”

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2023/08/05/ ... thorities/

******

LITHIUM RESERVES DISCOVERED IN AFRICA INCREASE
4 Aug 2023 , 4:01 pm .

Image
A lithium extraction mine in Zimbabwe (Photo: Getty Images)

Lithium reserves discovered in Africa have increased in the last three years. According to projections by S&P Global Commodity Insights, the production of lithium-based raw materials in Africa will grow 30 times by 2027.

This would put the African continent in the crosshairs of this industry on a global scale, since this mineral is essential for the production of green energy. Lithium is used in the manufacture of batteries for countless technological products and for military use.

In the future, African countries will occupy 12% of the global market, compared to the 1% that corresponded to them in 2022, according to Sputnik systematizes . In a graph from the Russian media, you can see the increase in the production of this metal in five countries on that continent.

Image

Graph on the increase in lithium reserves in Africa (Photo: Sputnik)
Lithium is considered the white gold of the 21st century as it is used both in technological devices and in the aerospace and automobile industries. The need for it will grow as battery production increases, with production estimated to grow 40-fold by 2040.

https://misionverdad.com/aumentan-las-r ... -en-africa

Google Translator

******

Ultimatum to Niger expires

Image

August 6, 19:24

Niger is waiting. The ECOWAS ultimatum supported by the French colonialists, demanding that the military of Niger capitulate under the threat of foreign intervention, expires tonight. The military and the people of Niger say no to intervention and the French colonialists. At the rallies, the symbols of the Wagner PMC have already appeared, which in Africa is strongly associated with the liberation of peoples from Western colonization.

Whether a big war will start in Africa, we will find out tomorrow. Good luck to Niger in the coming struggle for freedom and independence.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8549170.html

Google Translator

******

Algeria and the Sahel on the Brink of War
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 6, 2023
Mohsen Abdelmoumen

Image
France wants to burn Africa. Here, the French army north of Niamey. D. R.

All the imperialist scavengers are there. All the ingredients are ready for war, and all the geopolitical players are in place. All that remains is the final act. Don’t imagine that Europe will be spared. The fires of hell will fall on our enemies.


Following the coup d’état perpetrated by the Presidential Guard led by General Abdourahamane Tiani in Niger on July 26, the Comité National de Sauvegarde de la Patrie (CNSP), set up by the leader of the putschists, decided to put an end to colonial France’s stranglehold on the country’s wealth, and stopped all deliveries of uranium to France.

More uranium, more light for the City of Lights

Niger supplies France with more than a third of the uranium needed to generate electricity for French cities, industries and the economy, while only 18% of Nigeriens have access to electricity. By 2022, Niger would account for around 4% of the world’s uranium production, making it the world’s seventh-largest uranium producer and possessing the richest uranium ore in Africa. Understandably, under the guise of protecting the Sahel from Islamist terrorists, France is above all protecting the uranium mines and the French personnel of Orano, formerly Areva, the 90% French state-owned multinational that operates the mines in Niger. So, while France lights up thanks to this uranium, over 80% of the population of Niger is without electricity.

In addition to plundering Niger for decades, the multinational Orano-Areva has no qualms about leaving millions of tonnes of radioactive sludge in the open air, which threatens to contaminate drinking water. For example, the Cominak mine in Arlit, in the Sahara, which was operated by Areva-Orano for forty years and closed two years ago, dumped over 20 million tonnes of radioactive sludge whose particles scatter in the wind, with all the disastrous consequences this entails. At least 100,000 people are at risk of radioactive contamination.In Niger, infant mortality is 11.5% (3rd worldwide), and average life expectancy is 52 years for men and 54 for women.Over 40% of children under the age of 14 work in uranium mines, falling ill and dying without any possibility of treatment.This is the result of decades of French and American exploitation of a country teeming with gold, diamonds and uranium.

When terrorism serves Paris’ interests

As for fighting terrorists, since when has France been fighting terrorism? Wasn’t it Hollande’s former foreign minister, the somnambulist Laurent Fabius, who declared that Al-Nosra was “doing a good job in Syria”?

Didn’t France welcome, supposedly in the name of sacrosanct “human rights”, the cutthroats of the Algerian people, and does it still give sanctuary today to individuals considered by the Algerian state to be terrorists, such as Rachad and the MAK, the latter of which demonstrates whenever it likes in the streets of Paris? Was it not France24, the voice of the Quai d’Orsay, which recently interviewed the head of Aqmi? Operation Barkane in the Sahel was never about fighting terrorism, it was just about protecting the theft of wealth by multinationals, including Mali’s gold.

Here’s a quote from General Tiani, who explained the situation very well a few days ago:

“We often located terrorists, but when we asked to attack them in order to eliminate them, President Bazoum told us to ask permission from the French forces first. But our soldiers were falling at the front and France was doing nothing… We decided to do the same thing as Mali and Burkina Faso.”

Today, 1,500 French soldiers are deployed in Niger, ostensibly to counter Islamist terrorism.But the CNSP has declared that it no longer wants the French military on its soil, to which France has declared that it refuses to evacuate its troops.France’s stubbornness could mean that a ground operation is in the offing.This is a plausible hypothesis, which we shall soon verify.

How are we to interpret the interview given to the Washington Post on August 3 by Bazoum, Niger’s Zelensky, a veritable puppet of France and the West, if not to call for Western intervention against his country, good colonized that he is? And then he mentions Wagner’s presence in Niger. Proof if it were needed that we are in a new confrontation between two blocs, Russia and China on the one hand, NATO and the West on the other. This interview takes us back to the old Cold War, where the world risked exploding into all-out war at any moment.

Mali, Burkina Faso: united front against ECOWAS

On Sunday, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), which is entirely controlled by France, issued an ultimatum to Niger and gave the putschists one week to re-establish the elected government or risk military intervention with the support of the United States and France, now joined by the European Union and the United Kingdom.

Meanwhile, ECOWAS imposed drastic economic sanctions on Niger, banning flights, imports, exports, humanitarian aid and currency transactions. These sanctions have, among other things, led to power cuts in the capital, Niamey, and other major cities, as Nigeria, supplier of 70% of Niger’s electricity, has cut the supply. But General Tiani rejected the ECOWAS sanctions and declared that Niger “will not yield to the pressure of illegal and inhumane sanctions”.

Faced with threats of military intervention, Mali and Burkina Faso stood in solidarity with Niger and jointly declared that the attack on Niger would be considered an attack on all of them, and that they would respond with arms.

Fake news, ANP, interference: Algiers issues a warning

The Algerian Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement on August 1 declaring: “Algeria reaffirms its deep attachment to the restoration of constitutional order in Niger and respect for the requirements of the rule of law.In this respect, the Algerian government reaffirms its support for Mohamed Bazoum as the legitimate President of the Republic of Niger. “Adding: “The return to constitutional order must necessarily be achieved by peaceful means, which will prevent brotherly Niger and the whole region from sinking further into problems linked to insecurity and instability, and our peoples from entering into disasters and deprivation.” To conclude: “Consequently, Algeria warns, calls for caution and restraint in the face of intentions for foreign military intervention which, unfortunately, appear to be real and feasible options, while being factors which only complicate and exacerbate the current crisis.”

Rumors spread against Algeria to embroil it in armed conflict

Furthermore, all those who are spreading false information, speculating and making wild predictions about Army General and Chief of Staff Saïd Chengriha’s trip to Russia and Algeria’s involvement in what is shaping up to be a war in West Africa should refer to the official position of the Algerian state, which is very clear.

Publications on social networks and in certain sites spread the recurrent false rumor that the Algerian army is joining the coalition in a war against ECOWAS and NATO to defend Niger. Algeria has always affirmed its refusal to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, a fortiori militarily, and has always favored diplomatic means to resolve problems.

On August 3, the news that Algeria was banning French military aircraft from overflying its territory began to circulate on the Web, updating a decision dating back to October 2021 and dictated in reaction to Emmanuel Macron’s comments in the newspaper Le Monde, in which he asserted that Algeria, after its independence in 1962, had been built on “a memory rent” maintained by “the politico-military system”, and questioning the existence of an Algerian nation prior to French colonization. The overflight ban was lifted four months later, in February 2022.Some anti-Algerian circles in France go so far as to accuse Algeria of being behind the coup in Niger.

Russia, China and the Nigeria-Mediterranean pipeline

It’s clear that all these rumors propagated against Algeria are designed to embroil our country in a conflict that risks setting the whole region ablaze, a conflict wanted by France, the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom – the dying empire as a whole – who are pushing ECOWAS into military action. Coincidentally, all this is happening at a time when Algeria is financing a major pipeline project linking Nigeria to the Mediterranean, and after the Algerian president’s visit to Russia and China.

Faced with the loss of its influence in Africa, France wants to resort to force, and the United States, which has always let France steer its course in Africa as it wished, is now getting involved in what appears to be a second front stretching from Kiev to Niamey, with Niger at its epicenter but Algeria as its main target, a front in which two blocs are clashing, that of a declining empire against that of an emerging multipolar world led by Russia.

A great chess game, whose hidden aspects are more important than those we are shown, is currently taking place in the Sahel. It concerns the influence of Russia and China in Africa, the loss of France’s hold in its former colonies, the programmed death of American hegemony, and the project to destroy the Algerian state because of its stance in favor of a fairer world and the strength of its army, the largest in Africa in reality. The ANP, the backbone of the Algerian state, distorts the empire’s calculations and thwarts Western imperialist neo-colonialism.This is why Algeria remains a prime target and a country to be dismantled.

On the brink of war?

ECOWAS members Nigeria, Senegal and Côte d’Ivoire have all declared that they will take part in a military operation against Niger. France has begun evacuating some of its nationals, and the USA has ordered the departure of its non-essential embassy staff, implying that a military operation is imminent. An American C-17A military carrier flew to Benin and back, and a few hours later the Beninese government backed a military strike against Niger. War-monger Victoria Nuland visited Côte d’Ivoire on Wednesday to boost ECOWAS. The British Foreign Secretary travelled to Nigeria and declared the UK’s support for any action taken by ECOWAS against the new power in Niamey. The apostle of the apocalypse, Bernard Henri Lévy, that dog with a nose for war and blood, has been activated to sell a war in the Sahel that will target Algeria, as he did with Yugoslavia, Syria, Libya and Ukraine. Of course, all the imperialist scavengers are there. All the ingredients are ready for war, and all the geopolitical players are in place. All that remains is the final act. France is apparently not satisfied with the chaos it has sown in Libya and throughout the Sahel, the consequences of which we are still suffering today.

If the West imagines that Algeria will be the only one to suffer, it is mistaken.The fire will take hold in your comfortable living rooms, whose drapes and curtains are dripping with the blood of peoples.If your country burned when two policemen put an Algerian to death in France, imagine what will happen if you dare to touch a single hair of an Algerian in his own country? If a single drop of Algerian blood is spilled, all hell will break loose in France and Europe.You want to open Pandora’s box? So be it, but know that you will be consumed by the fire you have lit. You will be its fuel.

Colonialism is a bad pupil…

Negotiations between ECOWAS and Niger’s new government having failed, Niger has suspended all diplomatic relations with France, the USA, Togo and Nigeria and has recalled its ambassadors. Nigeria has deployed its air force to the Niger border, and US military aircraft are dropping military cargo around Niger. At any moment, an intervention could set Africa ablaze.

The empire cannot live without war. The same forces that waged war against Russia in Ukraine and lost want another war in Africa against Algeria and its allies. Morocco, vassal of the empire and the Zionist entity of Israel, which I have always called the Ukraine of North Africa, will serve as a launching pad. I recall the meeting in Tel Aviv a few weeks ago between French, Israeli, Emirati and Moroccan services.

The plan is therefore to take Algeria in a pincer movement, a veritable Blitzkrieg against our country. But if the empire thinks it’s going to win, it’s wrong. As General Giap said, “Colonialism is a bad pupil who doesn’t learn the lessons of history.” France was driven out of Algeria and has never recovered, and its American masters don’t want to admit that their hegemony is over. Everything has changed. The multipolar world is coming into being, it’s inescapable, and the capitalist, imperialist and criminal Western world is dying.

Once again, we notice the absence of the UN, that empty shell that serves no purpose and plays no role in any conflict. As ever, the UN is conspicuous by its absence, whether on the Ukrainian front, or now in the events in Niger. These institutions, which were set up after the Second World War and are completely subservient to the empire, need to be overhauled.

The Sahel, which is currently extremely unstable, looks set for a very hot summer. The wild horde is in battle order. The situation is explosive. We warn Westerners: before you embark on this adventure, be aware that our army is ready for all eventualities, and that if you want war, you’ll have to bear all the consequences.

Don’t imagine that Europe will be spared. The fires of hell will fall on our enemies. Our army is ready, our people are ready. We are all soldiers. Niger and the whole of Africa represent our geopolitical depth. Do not play within our perimeter. You have been warned. Algeria will resist the imperialist assaults and plots fomented against it in the hushed salons of Paris, Washington, London, Brussels, Rabat and Tel Aviv.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... nk-of-war/

From Chi-Town Bagman to ECOWAS Chairman: Former Money Launderer Leads the Push to Invade Niger
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 6, 2023
Alexander Rubenstein and Kit Klarenberg

Image
Since the overthrow of Niger’s US-friendly government, West African nations of the ECOWAS bloc have threatened an invasion of their neighbor.

Before leading the charge for intervention, ECOWAS chair Bola Tinubu spent years laundering millions for heroin dealers in Chicago, and has since been ensnared in numerous corruption scandals.


Hours after Niger’s Western-backed leader was detained by the country’s presidential guard on July 28, Nigerian President and chair of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Bola Tinubu leapt into action, warning that the group of nations “will not tolerate any situation that incapacitates the democratically-elected government.”

“As the Chairperson of ECOWAS…I state without equivocation that Nigeria stands firmly with the elected government in Niger.”

Two days later, ECOWAS imposed severe sanctions on Niger, and the bloc issued a stark ultimatum: if the newly-inaugurated junta won’t reinstall the ousted president in a week’s time, the group’s pro-Western African governments will — by military means, if necessary.

On Saturday, July 6 — one day before the deadline — ECOWAS leaders approved a plan to invade the country, with the ominous caveat that they are “not going to tell the coup plotters when and where we are going to strike.”

If ECOWAS gets its way, member states Benin, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Sénégal and Togo will be pressured to send their soldiers to invade Niger.

These developments have thrust the typically-overlooked West African country of Niger into the Western media spotlight. But if hostilities break out, it wouldn’t just be one single impoverished African state in the crosshairs.

Neighboring Burkina Faso, Mali and Guinea, which are also governed by military administrations that recently seized power by force, have all warned that any attack on Niger will be viewed as an attack on them too. If their ECOWAS rivals make the first move, the nations which mainstream media have dubbed Africa’s “coup belt” have pledged to unleash their military forces as well — an announcement which should end any illusions that restoring the country’s previous president would be a painless process.

Leading the pro-Western coalition is the president of its most powerful country, Nigeria: Bola Tinubu. One of Nigeria’s wealthiest men, the source of the scandal-plagued president’s fortune remains unclear.

Documents reviewed by The Grayzone reveal Tinubu as a longtime US asset who was named as an accomplice in a massive drug running operation that saw him launder millions on behalf of a heroin-dealing relative.

I had a great time with other Heads of State and important dignitaries at the State Banquet hosted by President Emmanuel Macron in Paris, France, this evening. President Macron and his wife, First Lady Brigitte Macron were both gracious and warm, making the event a very pleasant… pic.twitter.com/lTHTZfTIMC

— Bola Ahmed Tinubu (@officialABAT) June 22, 2023


Bola Tinubu’s career marred by drug-trafficking, corruption allegations

For over 30 years, Bola Tinubu has been a major force in Nigeria’s political scene and the country’s economy, with local nicknames ranging from “the Mother of the Market” to “the Godfather of Lagos” and “the Lion of Bourdillon.” But his power inside Nigeria went largely unnoticed by international audiences until 2023, when he became ECOWAS chair after winning the presidency in an election closely tracked by the US government.

As president, Tinubu quickly instituted a regime of economic reforms backed by the US-controlled International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Over the course of Tinubu’s political career in Nigeria, the African operator has cultivated a close relationship with the US embassy. According to a slew of classified State Department cables released by WikiLeaks, American officials relied heavily on Tinubu’s assessments of the domestic political landscape.

The ECOWAS chair’s early life is shrouded in mystery, and even his exact age is unknown. Nearly every detail of Tinubu’s personal history — prior to his appearance in Chicago on a student visa — is in dispute, including his legal birth name.

Records from Chicago State University show that Tinubu received a degree in Business Administration in 1979. In the following years, media reports indicate that Tinubu was employed in some capacity at a number of major US-based multinationals, including Mobil Oil Nigeria, consulting firm Deloitte, and GTE, which was the largest communication and utilities company in the US at the time.

Of the few details about the Nigerian President’s early exploits which can be confirmed, many are derived from a 1993 court docket naming Tinubu as an accomplice in a massive midwestern drug smuggling operation.

As journalist David Hundeyin has detailed, court documents from the US District Court’s Northern District of Illinois make it clear that Tinubu amassed a small fortune laundering money for a heroin-trafficking relative in Chicago, and that US government officials ultimately seized well over a million dollars from various bank accounts registered under the current Nigerian president’s name.

A 1993 report by IRS Special Agent Kevin Moss explained that “there is probable cause to believe that funds in certain bank accounts controlled by Bola Tinubu… represent proceeds of drug trafficking; therefore these funds are forfeitable to the United States.”

In the documents, Moss describes an extremely close working relationship between the future Nigerian president and two Nigerian heroin dealers named Abiodun Olasuyi Agbele and Adegboyega Mueez Akande, the latter of whom was listed as Tinubu’s cousin on an application for a vehicle loan.

“According to bank employees, when Bola Tinubu came to First Heritage Bank in December 1989 to open the accounts, he was introduced to them by Adegboyega Mueez Akande, who at that time maintained an account at the bank.” What’s more, bank records indicate that “Bola Tinubu also opened a joint checking account in his name and the name of his wife, Oluremi Tinubu,” who had “previously opened a joint bank account also at this bank with Audrey Akande, the wife of Adegboyega Mueez Akande,” Moss explained. In several of the applications, the addresses used by Tinubu exactly matched those previously used by Akande.

Image

“According to bank records… Tinubu opened an individual money market account and a NOW account” at First Heritage Bank in December 1989, the special agent noted. “In the application, Tinubu stated that his address was 7504 South Stewart, Chicago, Illinois” — “the same address used previously by Akande.”

Image

“Bank records disclosed that five days after the account was opened, on January 4, 1990, $80,000 was deposited into the NOW account at First Heritage Bank by wire transfer through First Chicago from Banc One Houston,” the report continues. According to the IRS, the money was sent by Akande.

But the Nigerian president’s financial dealings with the heroin traffickers went even further, according to the IRS special agent. He wrote that Citibank records documented “two additional corporate accounts held in the name of Compass Finance and Investment Company, Ltd. which were controlled by Bola Tinubu.”

“When Bola Tinubu opened these accounts,” he provided “a memorandum of association and articles of association” which “identified Mueez Adegboyega Akande and Abiodun Olasuyi Agbele as directors of Compass Finance and Investment Company, Ltd.,” Moss wrote.

In the end, Tinubu somehow managed to deposit over $660,000 in his First Heritage Bank account in 1990, and more than $1.2 million the next year — all while claiming to take home just $2,400 a month from his position at Mobil Oil Nigeria.

As the investigation into the money laundering scheme began to gain traction, Tinubu left the US and returned to Nigeria. Ultimately, Moss was able to speak to Tinubu by telephone on a number of occasions, and the special agent reported that the future president initially acknowledged his personal and financial dealings with the pair of drug traffickers.

But in late January of 1992, “Tinubu advised agents investigating this matter that he had no business association or financial relationship with Abele or Akande,” Moss wrote. “This information contradicted his prior statements on January 13, 1992, when he advised law enforcement officers that the money used to open the account at First Heritage Bank had come from Akande.”

Back in Nigeria, Tinubu had already begun to transition into the political arena. By 1992, he’d been elected to the Senate, and in 1999 he became the Governor of Lagos State, a position he retained until 2007. At some point in his tenure, Tinubu established a relationship with the US Embassy which would last for years to come, according to a trove of diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks.

But even his State Department allies couldn’t help noticing Tinubu’s penchant for dishonesty. One particularly noteworthy cable pointed out that the politician was “known to play fast and loose with the facts” and “has been caught in the past embellishing his educational achievements.”

In the end, however, Tinubu’s usefulness seemed to outweigh his casual relationship with the truth, and the future Nigerian president went on to provide American officials with a near-continuous assessment of the political situation in his country. One typically intimate meeting with Tinubu ended with the US ambassador to Nigeria commenting: “as always, we found his take on the national political scene to be insightful.”

When the cables came to light in 2011, many Nigerians were shocked at the candor with which their elected officials spoke to Washington’s envoys. “The willingness of our elites to divulge unsolicited information about the nation to U.S. officials betrays an infantile thirst for a paternal dictatorship,” Nigerian-American professor and columnist Farooq Kperogi wrote.

Though Tinubu appeared to have escaped justice for his alleged role in a heroin trafficking conspiracy, accusations of corruption would continue to dog the ECOWAS chair throughout his political career in Nigeria. Since leaving office as governor of Lagos in 2007, Tinubu “picked every subsequent winning candidate,” according to German broadcaster DW, which noted earlier this year that the tycoon “is believed to be one of Nigeria’s richest politicians but the source of his wealth is unknown.”

In recent years, clues about the origins of the fortune amassed by one of Africa’s leading political players have begun to come to light.

In 2009, Tinubu came under investigation by the Metropolitan Police of London, who were probing allegations that the politician had pooled money with two other Nigerian governors to create a front company known as the “African Development Fund Incorporation.”

Investigators alleged the unusual business arrangement was actually a joint effort to illegally acquire shares of ECONET, a telecommunications firm founded by US intelligence asset and Gates Foundation trustee Strive Masiyiwa. But attempts to probe the legitimacy of the transactions in question were sidelined when the Nigerian federal government stonewalled the British investigation, which ultimately concluded without a single arrest. To this day, Nigerian authorities have yet to release the evidence requested by UK authorities.

In 2011, Tinubu was tried before the Code of Conduct Tribunal in Nigeria for illegally operating 16 foreign bank accounts. Eager to avoid the embarrassment he’d previously suffered when being photographed in court, the ECOWAS chair reportedly refused to take his place at the dock in a judicial hearing.

But the unwelcome attention appears to have done little to rein in the politician’s extravagant taste, and Tinubu once again found himself embroiled in a corruption scandal following an investigation into the luxurious 7,000-square foot mansion where the Nigerian president stays when receiving medical care in London.

Image
Tinubu inside his London mansion with a Nigerian governor, Dapo Abiodun (graphic by Premium Times).
According to Nigerian outlet Premium Times, the massive villa in London’s exclusive Westminster borough was picked up for a song by Tinubu’s son, who somehow managed to purchase the property at a discount of approximately $10 million from a wealthy fugitive – even though the seller’s assets, including the mansion in question, had been frozen by a Nigerian court. Photos published on social media in 2017 show Tinubu posing inside the villa alongside Nigeria’s president at the time, Muhammadu Buhari.

The current and previous president worked closely for decades, and Tinubu has publicly claimed sole credit for Buhari’s presidency while campaigning. “If it were not for me standing before you leading the army, saying ‘Buhari, go ahead, we’re behind you,’ he could never have become the president,” he told supporters at a rally last year.

But the suspicious confluence of money and influence didn’t end with the mysterious mansion in London. During Nigeria’s 2019 general election, footage of armored trucks entering Tinubu’s residence went viral on social media, and the incident was widely seen as proof that the politician was engaged in a fraudulent vote-buying scheme. But Tinubu remained defiant, telling reporters, “I keep money wherever I want.”

“Excuse me, is it my money or government money?” he asked. “If I don’t represent any agency of government and I have money to spend, if I have money, if I like, I give it to the people free of charge,” he insisted.

This January, the official explanation for the episode evolved again when one of his party’s representatives told a Nigerian TV station that the armored trucks in question had simply “missed [their] way” and arrived at the wrong address. Asked why Tinubu had seemingly admitted to dispensing cash to the public, the party’s organizing secretary in Lagos offered the bemused presenters an equally improbable explanation: “he said that jokingly.”

ECOWAS as a neocolonial weapon

While ECOWAS was officially founded via the Treaty of Lagos in 1975, its official history notes the bloc’s origins date back to the creation of the CFA Franc in 1945, which consolidated France’s West African empire into a single-currency union. Publicly, the move was described as a benevolent attempt to shield these colonies from the consequences of the French franc’s sharp devaluation in 1945, following the creation of the US-dominated Bretton Woods system. As the French finance minister said at the time:

“In a show of her generosity and selflessness, metropolitan France, wishing not to impose on her faraway daughters the consequences of her own poverty, is setting different exchange rates for their currency.”

In reality, the introduction of the CFA Franc meant that Paris was able to maintain highly unequal trading relationships with its African colonies, at a time when its economy was ravaged by World War II and its overseas empire was rapidly disintegrating. The currency made it cheap for member states to import from France and vice versa, but prohibitively expensive for them to export anything anywhere else.

This forced dependency in Francophone West Africa created a captive market for the French, and by extension the rest of Europe. That dynamic, which has stunted regional economic development for decades, persists to this day. The CFA Franc’s continued dominance ensures West African states remain under the economic and political control of France. Those African nations are powerless to enact meaningful policy changes, as they lack control over their own monetary policy.

That the currency features so prominently in the authorized history of ECOWAS is instructive, because the bloc has long-been criticized as an extension of French imperialism. It was not for nothing that in 1960, then-French President Charles de Gaulle made membership of the CFA Franc a precondition for decolonization in Africa.

Though ECOWAS is theoretically meant to maximize member states’ collective bargaining power by fostering “interstate economic and political cooperation,” such harmonization makes it easier for former imperial powers like France to exploit and enfeeble their constituent countries. The bloc imposes a strict, Western-approved legal and financial framework upon its members, and any state deviating from these rules is harshly punished.

In January 2022, ECOWAS imposed strict sanctions on Mali, prompting thousands to take to the streets in support of the military government that seized power in January the previous year. The new government’s efforts to purge the country of malign foreign influence saw a complete ban on French media imposed, a decision which was slammed by the UN but cheered by average Malians.

ECOWAS applied similar measures to Burkina Faso in response to a September 2022 military coup, which saw Paul-Henri Sandaogo Damiba removed after just eight months in power. Though Damiba himself seized via military coup, there was little condemnation from Western officials and few suggestions that ECOWAS impose sanctions — perhaps due to the ousted leader’s pro-Western orientation and status as a graduate of multiple elite US military and State Department training courses.

Since 1990, ECOWAS has waged seven separate conflicts in West Africa, in order to protect the West’s preferred despots across the region. Meanwhile, between 1960 and 2020, Paris launched 50 separate overt interventions in Africa. Figures for clandestine activities conducted during this time are unavailable, but the country’s fingerprints are plastered all over multiple rigged elections, coups, and assassinations that have sustained compliant, corrupt governments in power throughout the continent.

As President Jacques Chirac remarked in 2008, “without Africa, France will slide down into the rank of a third [world] power.” This perspective was reaffirmed in a 2013 French Senate report, Africa is Our Future. Indeed, the mere existence of anti-imperialist governments anywhere in the region is intolerable to Paris.

Luckily for the French elite, compromised figures like Bola Tinubu are still on hand to do their dirty work for them.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... ade-niger/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Mon Aug 07, 2023 2:10 pm

Niger: Old Europe on trial
August 7, 2023 Geraldina Colotti

Image

Gold, silicon, oil (reserves estimated at 2 billion barrels), and above all, uranium are essential for both French nuclear power plants and atomic bombs. Strategic raw materials for imperialism, which needs to consolidate its domination at the expense of the countries of the South. This is the key to understanding the fibrillation provoked, in the United States and especially in the European Union, by the coup d’état in Niger.

On July 28, General Abdourahamane Tchiani, head of the Presidential Guard, was proclaimed the new leader of Niger and assumed the presidency of the National Council for the Protection of the Homeland (CNSP), after having ousted the Western-backed President Mohamed Bazoum. The communiqué of the rebel military denounces the “lack of measures to face the economic crisis and the deterioration of the security situation”, undermined by the violence of the jihadist groups. Bazoum is accused of having “tried to convince people that everything is going well, the harsh reality is a lot of death, displaced people, humiliations and frustrations. Today’s approach has not brought security despite great sacrifices.”

Niger is, in fact, the first supplier of uranium to the EU, covering 24% of its needs. With its 3,527 tons (5% of world production), it is the world’s sixth-largest uranium producer. A resource from which, however, it does not benefit, considering that, according to World Bank data from 2021, out of a population of 27 million, only 18.6% had access to electricity.

Then there is on the table the large amount of depleted uranium, waste from nuclear power plants also transferred for military use. Nuclear energy multinationals save millions of dollars in safe storage by passing it on to weapons companies, who use it as virtually free “raw material” to produce anti-tank munitions for use in theaters of war.

France directly controls two uranium mines, Akouta and Arlit, through the company Orano, which changed its name in 2018 when Areva was shut down. Akouta, the “largest subway mine in the world”, managed by a French, Japanese, and Spanish joint venture 6 km from the town of Akokan, was closed in 2021, after having extracted 75 thousand tons of uranium in 43 years of activity. Behind it, it left 20 million tons of radioactive sludge, 600 unemployed and cancer-stricken workers, houses without electricity and water, and an area that would need 145 million euros to be recovered.

History reminds us that when the people of Congo decided to regain control of the resources by electing Patrice Lumumba, imperialism unleashed secession in the Katanga mining region and cut short the life of the president in 1961. The pro-Western dictator Mobutu was put in his place, to ensure that Congo’s strategic resources, such as the plutonium that was used for the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, did not end up in the hands of the people and under the influence of the Soviet Union. Times change, but the nature of imperialism and its purposes do not.

Paris has threatened military intervention in what U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, during his last visit, had praised as an “example of democracy in the Sahel”. An African region in which Moscow’s influence is advancing. This was made clear at the Russia-Africa summit in St. Petersburg, which brought together 49 African delegations (from 54 nations), 16 of them at the level of heads of state, and gave space to the new anti-imperialist military figures of Burkina Faso or Mali, spokesmen for the growing intolerance towards the Western powers.

Also, on the African continent, the number of countries oriented to focus on the BRICS is increasing, in particular, Russia and China (two members of the BRICS, together with Brazil, India, and South Africa), which offer military and economic aid not conditional on “structural reforms” or adherence to cultural models different from the local ones. Within this framework, collaboration with the progressive countries of Latin America is increasing after the historically consolidated collaboration with Cuba and Venezuela, supporters of a south-south relationship model based on relations of equality.

Brazilian President Lula da Silva confirmed his intention to strengthen Brazil’s ties with the African continent, as he had already done in his previous periods in power. In the framework of the G7 summit, during a bilateral meeting with the President of Comoros, he said that he wants to support the entry of the African Union into the G20 in order to favor a global diplomatic rebalance. It is in the same perspective of South-South integration, which characterizes Gustavo Petro’s policy that one should read the trip made in May by Francia Marquez, Vice President of Colombia, to Ethiopia, Kenya, and South Africa, three key countries in their respective geographical areas and on the continent.

The governments of Burkina and Mali have responded harshly to threats of military intervention by France and its allies in the region, who do not intend to “recognize” the patriotic junta. The High Representative for European Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, considered the coup “unacceptable” and announced, as did the U.S., the interruption of economic aid and the suspension of security cooperation programs. An unprecedented decision after the end of the “cold war”, which definitively subjected Africa to a new colonialism following the failure of the independence movements.

In June, the EU Council approved the allocation of a further 5 million euros in military aid to support Niger’s armed forces. The measure was financed by the European Peace Facility (EPF), the same fund used to send arms to Ukraine. In Niger, which has remained in the Western orbit, along with Chad, there are about 2,000 soldiers from the French anti-jihadist force Barkhane and those from the European-mandated mission Takuba, in which Italy participates with about 300 soldiers.

However, the failure of a neo-colonial security model for the Sahel shows that it is not the security of the citizens that the European military has gone to guarantee but its own material interests. A further sign is that the rebel officers in Niger had been trained by Western forces….

In Niger, the M62 Movement, which includes associations and trade unions, and which has been fighting for years against the colonial presence, has led thousands of people to protest, waving Russian flags and shouting pro-Putin slogans in support of the military junta that seized power. Faced with the spread of radical Islamism, used as a weapon of control by the US and its allies, the Sahel, like the rest of the African continent, has seen the spread of a new colonial occupation through the military missions of multinational forces.

Military insurgents have denounced that, despite having become the “core of the French and Western intervention in the Sahel”, Niger has remained exposed to jihadist attacks in the area of the “three borders” (Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso), which, in 2023 alone, caused more than 400 deaths. The colonial division of Africa was sanctioned by the Berlin Conference (1884-1885), in which, however, the African rulers did not participate.

A fact that marked in a striking way the legitimization of the hegemonic design of European colonialism over the whole continent. Dividing “with the team and the rule” territories, creating forced separations and inclusions, generating borders that unite or separate different peoples who previously lived together, and sowing the seeds of devastating conflicts, disguised as “ethnic” conflicts.

The recent example of Libya confirms the same colonial logic, the same strategy of “balkanization” of the world (and of brains) that is part of the fourth and fifth-generation wars deployed by imperialism. On May 26, 2011, then-Nigerian President Mahamadou Issofou, invited to the Deauville summit, was the only one to tell Western leaders that intervention in Libya would transform the country into another Somalia, offering an incredible opportunity for radical Islamism.

“We assessed the Libyan war – he said – as a threat to our country and to the region that will drag on for years to come… We warned the West against the destruction of the Libyan state… We told the West not to lose sight of reality and to take Libyan society into account.” A voice crying in the wilderness, as was that of the ALBA countries, which proposed, unheeded, a non-asymmetrical negotiation based on peace diplomacy.

The failure of the neo-colonial model in the Sahel presents a scenario similar to that recorded in the Arab world where today, especially among the Gulf monarchies, there is a marked detachment from the American protagonists who, with the Obama Administration, supported the so-called “Arab Spring”, which destabilized or attempted to destabilize the Arab regimes, including many governments friendly to the West.

Niger is also a center of migratory routes, and the issue of Libya, a neighboring country, has much to do with the management of flows imposed by “fortress Europe”, where migrant trafficking is rampant. Into this picture fits the so-called “Mattei plan” that the Italian government of Giorgia Meloni (extreme right) is trying to impose in Africa, and especially in the Sahel, which has great importance in the management of migratory “flows”, relying on rulers friendly to the West.

In recent years, Libya has become a transit point for millions of people of different nationalities trying to reach Europe. Since the signing of the infamous Italy-Libya Memorandum in 2017, more than 100 million euros have found their way into the pockets of the so-called Libyan coast guard in training and equipment. One billion from Italy and the EU for the various missions in Libya and the Mediterranean often used more to counter volunteer rescuers on NGO boats than to save lives. Since 2017, more than 100,000 people have been turned back after being intercepted by the Libyan Coast Guard in central Mediterranean waters.

Italy, like all EU member states, needs oil and gas from Libya, a country that imperialist forces dismembered by killing Gaddafi in 2011 and which now has three “governments.” Meloni recently signed an $8 billion deal between Eni, the Italian national hydrocarbon company, and the Libyan National Oil Corporation for the exploitation of an offshore gas field off the coast of Tripoli.

To follow NATO and European Union directives, Italy does not recognize the Libyan government legitimized by a duly elected parliament, that of Prime Minister Fathi Bashagha, who controls most of Libya’s territory and energy resources, and who operates on a parallel track from the cities of Syrte and Benghazi because Dbeibah government militias prevent him from entering Tripoli. Bashagha would be willing to offer Italy, whose Libyan gas imports have fallen from about 8 billion cubic meters per year before 2011 to about 2.5 billion in 2022, gas and oil at low prices. Italy, however, refuses.

In addition, it is estimated that from 2015 to 2022, the European Union spent between 93 and 178 million euros to reinforce Tunisia’s land and sea borders. To this must be added a final tranche of 105 million. A trend that will certainly not diminish with the rhetoric of the so-called “Mattei plan” for the development of Africa, launched by Meloni with a new intention of “colonialism in disguise”,

As Immanuel Ness, author of the book “Migration as Economic Imperialism” rightly explains, neoliberal capitalism and economic imperialism in its present form cannot survive without Third World migration. If we examine – says Ness in an interview to El Salto – the demographics of most rich countries, migrant labor, mostly temporary migrants, represents more than 10% of the population.

In Qatar, foreign migrant labor makes up 90% of the population without citizenship rights. They are integral to the satisfaction of a whole range of needs of the capitalist class: from agricultural products, housing, and manufactured goods, to domestic and welfare services. Benefits that, without workers from the global periphery, would not be possible.

But these migrant workers, who serve to ensure that capitalist profitability is not reduced and the working class in the North continues to maintain a high standard of living, cannot enter and remain in the Global North permanently but are considered temporary or “illegal” in most of Western Europe and North America, as well as in other rich states and economic centers; and are under relentless threat of detention, imprisonment, and deportation. It is a central feature of the depravity of 21st-century economic imperialism, says Ness.

In Niger, the military rebels issue a precise warning: “Any external military intervention, whatever its origin, would risk having disastrous and incalculable consequences for our populations and would be chaos for our country”. Words that echo those of the Ghanaian revolutionary, a leading figure in the history of decolonization and pan-Africanism, Kwame Nkrumah, born in 1909 and died in 1972: “Dedicated as I am to the total destruction of colonialism in all its forms, I do not support any colonial government of any kind. The British, French, Portuguese, Belgians, Belgians, Spanish, Germans and Italians, at one time or another, have ruled parts of Africa or continue to do so. Their methods may have been different, but their objectives were the same: to enrich themselves at the expense of their colonies.”

Source: Cuba en Resumen

https://www.struggle-la-lucha.org/2023/ ... -on-trial/

******

ECOWAS prepares statement after winning ultimatum in Niger

Image
The National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland (CNSP) established the closure of the national airspace. | Photo: EFE
Published 7 August 2023

The West African bloc said it does not rule out diplomatic attempts before using military force.

The Economic Community of West African State (ECOWAS) announced that it will issue a statement on Monday after defeating the ultimatum given to Niger's military junta that overthrew President Mohamed Bazoum.

The West African regional bloc reported that while the coup junta has maintained a position against dialogue, it does not rule out diplomatic attempts before using military force.

In this sense, the Italian Foreign Minister, Antonio Tajani, expressed the hope that the ultimatum imposed by ECOWAS will be extended this Monday in order to avoid armed intervention.


The declarations of the integrationist organization come after the self-styled National Council for the Safeguarding of the Homeland (CNSP) established the closure of the national airspace.

For its part, ECOWAS announced last Saturday that its military chiefs met in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, to agree on an intervention plan in Niger while ensuring that they have the necessary resources.


Instead, the head of the coup junta, Colonel Amadou Abdramane, said last Sunday that the Army and the Nigerien people are willing to face any foreign aggression.

"In any case, the Nigerien Armed Forces and all our defense and security forces, backed by the unwavering support of our people, are ready to defend the integrity of our territory and the honor of our country," he said.

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/cedeao-j ... -0010.html

Niger closes airspace and denounces possible military intervention

Image
Tens of thousands of people demonstrated again this Sunday in Niamey to express their support for the coup junta in Niger. | Photo: EFE
Posted 6 August 2023 (14 hours 43 minutes ago)

The Junta warned that it "is closely following the preparations for this war by delegation," while in another statement it launched "a vibrant appeal" to the young people to prepare to "defend the homeland."

The military junta in Niger announced this Sunday that it will again close the airspace of the African country as of local midnight (UTC) coinciding with the expiration of the ultimatum that the Economic Community of West African State (Cedeao) gave to the military in the power to restore constitutional order, under the threat of military intervention.

According to a statement read by Major Colonel Amadou Abdaramane on public television tonight, the coup junta warns that any violation of this measure will have an "energetic" and "instantaneous" response.

"Given the threat of intervention that is required through the preparation from a neighboring country, the airspace of Niger is closed from today, August 2, for all aircraft until further notice, any attempt to violate the airspace will have an energetic and instant response. ", according to the note read by Abdaramane.


In this sense, the Board affirmed that the Community of West African States (Cedeao) completed "the planning of the war" against the African country and stressed that two Central African countries began with a pre-deployment of their troops.

Abdramane said that the Junta warned that it "is closely following the preparations for this war by delegation," while in another statement, the CNSP launched "a vibrant appeal" to the youth to prepare to "defend the homeland."

He also accused "a foreign power" of preparing "an aggression" against his country in coordination with ECOWAS. Abdramane said that he has "consistent information" about the preparations of "the forces of a foreign power" for an aggression against the country and "against its people" in coordination with ECOWAS and with "terrorist armed groups."

The board did not cite or elaborate on the foreign power it refers to.

ECOWAS, which decreed commercial and financial sanctions against Niger, gave the coup leaders an ultimatum that expires at midnight this Sunday to return the deposed president, Mohamed Bazoum, to power under the threat of military intervention.

France, a former colonial power and which has a strong military presence in Niger, said yesterday that it "firmly and determinedly supports" ECOWAS efforts "to make the military coup in Niger fail."

https://www.telesurtv.net/news/niger-ci ... -0027.html

Google Translator

******

Africa's Turn Towards Russia

Karolina Koval, Fudan University (China), Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology (Russian Academy of Sciences) - special for InfoBRICS


Interview with Ashley Otu, Founder and researcher at IDCOOP ashleyotu@gmail.com

- Ashley, tell us please, what are the prospects for cooperation between Russia and Africa? Could you name the most profitable areas for partnership?

- I believe the areas of increased co-operation between Russia and African nations are in the areas of agriculture, energy, security, education and health

- What problems and challenges are there? Western countries are putting pressure on Africa not to cooperate with Russia there. What advantages does Russia have?

- The problems and challenges which Russia faces, regarding increasing co-operation in Africa is logistical, financial infrastructure and cultural. Some Western nations have the advantage of dominating certain nations economically and culturally. Now, the advantages that Russia has unlike Western nations is historically, Russia was never involved in colonialising in Africa and during the cold war, contributed to a number of African nations gaining independence from former western colonial powers.

- What positive aspects of the Russia-Africa Forum memorandum can you mention?

- The positive aspects of the recent Russia-Africa Forum were 4 joint declarations signed between Russia and all heads of states, including the head of the African Union. Moreover, Russia planning to increase the number of embassies in nations, where since the 1990s, was closed down. Furthermore, Russia announced it will provide grain for free after its withdrawal from the failing grain deal, where Africa was provided with little to no grain. In addition, Russia announced it would write off a total of $23 billion in debt obligations.

- Russia will continue grain supplies to the African continent. Actually, in 3-4 months, free grain will be sent to Africa. Are there any stumbling blocks to resolve this issue?

- The potential stumbling blocks to Russia’s ability to deliver grain is logistics, considering the risks of undersea drone attacks in the Black Sea by the Ukraine forces. The way to overcome this is potential setback is to increase the transit of grain via the North-South Transport Corridor to have a secure route to facilitate deliveries to Africa.

- A number of countries on the African continent are preparing to join the BRICS and prefer to cooperate not with Europe and the United States, but with Russia, China and their allies. What is the reason for this?

- The main reasons why BRICS looks attractive for the number of African nations wanting to join is economics. Especially, as each nation has undergone the same or similar experience of development (neo-liberalism and its disastrous effects). BRICS has surpassed the G7 in terms of total GDP value and wealth. The group members never interfere with a nation’s internal affairs. Especially, as certain western nations which have historically and to this day, continue to openly sponsor colour revolutions to topple governments, and force controversial policies on nations which don’t abide by their demands. The emergence of new multilateral institutions such as the BRICS new development bank and AIIB (Asian Investment Infrastructure Bank), provides a new source of funding to support key projects in African nations and breaks the monopoly of financial loaning from the World Bank and in the worst-case scenario, the I.M.F. Each member of the BRICS has played a key role in supporting the interests of African nations at other multilateral institutions such as the G20, supporting the application of the African Union to become a member.

- How could we improve interaction in the cultural sphere? Frankly speaking, cultural exchange is the basis of prosperous relations between peoples?

- I believe Russia must increase its cultural exchanges in education, sports, art and media. As these kind of exchanges are necessary to understand what makes it nation unique and areas of cooperation. When I was younger, I was always told that Russians were racist, growing up in England. Once I began watching some Russian films and did a university class on Russian contemporary cinema, my interest and appreciation of the nation and its people grew. Every May the 9, I always watch the victory parade of Russia’s victory during The Great Patriotic War (1941-1945) and honouring the lives sacrificed. So, I believe cultural exchanges is necessary to overcome any negative stereotypes and biases which have being promoted through certain western soft power (films, TV, religion, music, arts, NGOs and language programmes) in Africa.

- What is BRICS for you and who are you in this union?

- For me, the BRICS group of nations, provide alternative economic development models for other developing nations to pursue, instead of the failed neo-liberal policies which continue to be promoted by western nations despite the failed promises of neo-liberalist policies in a number of regions (Latin America, Africa, South Asia and Eastern Europe). Where I am in this union is, I am part of the African diaspora. Having been born and raised in the United Kingdom, I have grown and learnt how and why western hegemony has been nothing but a bad outcome for everyone, whether you are born in your homeland or born abroad, and the treatment is the same. I believe with the emergence of the multipolar world and the end of western hegemony, I believe the outcome will be better for everyone. Especially, as the majority of global growth will be generated from emerging economies in the global south and mainly members of the BRICS. Demonstrating the best development policies are pursued by state-led capitalism and not leaving the fate of the nation to the free market (the invisible hand).

Source: InfoBrics

http://infobrics.org/post/39037/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Tue Aug 08, 2023 2:10 pm

AUGUST 8, 2023 BY M. K. BHADRAKUMAR
Niger rejects rules-based order

Image
Nigeriens participate in a march called by supporters of coup leader Gen. Abdourahmane Tchiani in Niamey, Niger, July 30, 2023. Poster reads: ”Down with France, long live Putin.”

The coup in the West African state of Niger on July 26 and the Russia-Africa Summit the next day in St. Petersburg are playing out in the backdrop of multipolarity in the world order. Seemingly independent events, they capture nonetheless the zeitgeist of our transformative era.

First, the big picture — the Africa summit hosted by Russia on July 27-28 poses a big challenge to the West, which instinctively sought to downplay the event after having failed to lobby against sovereign African nations meeting the Russian leadership. 49 African countries sent their delegations to St. Petersburg, with seventeen heads of states traveling in person to Russia to discuss political, humanitarian and economic issues. For the host country, which is in the middle of a war, this was a remarkable diplomatic success.

The summit was quintessentially a political event. Its leitmotif was the juxtaposition of Russia’s long-standing support for Africans resisting imperialism and the predatory nature of western neo-colonialism. This works brilliantly for Russia today, which has no colonial history of exploitation and plunder of Africa.

While every now and then skeletons from the colonial era keep rolling out of the Western closet, dating back to the unlamented African slave trade, Russia taps into the Soviet legacy of being on the ‘right side of history’ — even resurrecting the full name of Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia in Moscow.

Yet, it wasn’t all politics. The summit deliberations on Russia-Africa partnership helping the continent achieve ‘‘food sovereignty,’’ alternatives to the grain deal, new logistics corridors for Russian food and fertilisers; enhancement of trade, economic, cultural, educational, scientific, and security cooperation; Africa potentially joining the International North–South Transport Corridor; Russia’s participation in African infrastructure projects; Russia-Africa Partnership Forum Action Plan to 2026 — these testify to the quantifiable outcome.

Enter Niger. The most recent developments in Niger underscore the leitmotif of the Russia-Africa summit. Russia’s prognosis of the African crisis stands vindicated — the continuing ravages of Western imperialism. This is evident from the reports of Russian flags seen at demonstrations in Niamey, Niger’s capital.

The rebels who seized power lost no time to denounce Niger’s military-technical cooperation agreements with France, which has been followed up with the demand that France withdraw its troops within 30 days. On its part, France has spoken ‘‘firmly and resolutely’’ in favour of foreign military intervention ‘‘to suppress the coup attempt.’’ The French authorities made it clear that they have no plan to withdraw their armed contingent of 1,500 people who are in Niger “at the request of the legitimate authorities of the country on the basis of signed agreements.”

France’s stance comes as no surprise – Paris does not want to lose its position in Sahel region and the cheap source of resources, especially uranium. But France miscalculated that the coup didn’t enjoy the support of the Nigerien military or had a social base, and all that was needed to roll it back would be a limited demonstration of force that would compel the elite presidential guard to begin direct negotiations with France.

France and the US coordinate their actions with the Economic Community of West African States [ECOWAS]. The ECOWAS initially did some sabre-rattling but has piped down. Its deadline for intervention has passed. The ECOWAS simply does not have a mechanism for the rapid gathering of troops and the coordination of hostilities, and its powerhouse Nigeria has its hands full tackling internal security. The Nigerian public opinion feels wary about a blowback — Niger is a large country and has a 1500-kilometre long porous border with Nigeria. An unspoken truth is, Nigeria is hardly interested in increasing the French military presence in Niger or on being on the same side with France, which is extremely unpopular throughout the Sahel.

The mother of all surprises is that the military coup enjoys a groundswell of popular support. Under the circumstances, the strong likelihood is that the French troops may be forced to leave Niger, its former colony. Niger is a victim of neo-colonial exploitation. Under the guise of fighting terrorism, which is, ironically, a spillover from the NATO intervention in Libya in 2011 spearheaded by none other than France into the Sahel region, France ruthlessly exploited Niger’s mineral resources.

A noted Nigerian poet and literary critic Prof. Osundare wrote last week, ‘‘Probe the cause, course, and symptoms of the present resurgence of military coups in West Africa. Find a cure for this pandemic. More important, find a cure for the plague of political and socio-economic injustices responsible for the inevitability of its recurrence. Remember the present brutish anarchy in Libya and the countless repercussions of the destabilisation of that once blooming country for the West African region.’’

The only regional state that can afford effective military intervention in Niger is Algeria. But Algeria has neither any experience in conducting such operations on a regional scale nor has any intention to depart from its consistent policy of non-interference in the internal politics of a sovereign country. Algeria has warned against any external military intervention in Niger. ‘‘Flaunting military intervention in Niger is a direct threat to Algeria, and we completely and categorically reject it… Problems should be solved peacefully,” said Algerian president Abdelmadjid Tebboune.

At its core, without doubt, the coup in Niger Republic narrows down to a struggle between Nigeriens and the colonial powers. To be sure, the growing trend of multipolarity in the world order emboldens African nations to shake off neo-colonialism. This is one thing. On the other hand, the big powers are being compelled to negotiate rather than dictate.

Interestingly, Washington has been relatively restrained. President Biden’s espousal of ‘’values’’ fell far short of the diktat on ‘‘rules-based order’’ — although America reportedly has 3 military bases in Niger. In the multipolar setting, African nations are gaining space to negotiate. Russia’s pro activism will spur this process. China also has economic stakes in in Niger.

Notably, the coup leader Abdurahman Tchiani is on record that “the French have no objective reasons to leave Niger,” signalling that a fair and equitable relationship is possible. Russia has been cautious that the key task at the moment is “to prevent further degradation of the situation in the country.” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said, ‘‘We consider it an urgent task to organise a national dialogue to restore civil peace, ensure law and order… we believe that the threat of the use of force against a sovereign state will not contribute to defusing tensions and resolving the situation in the country,” .

Clearly, Niamey will not succumb to pressure from outsiders. “Niger’s armed forces and all our defence and security forces, backed by the unfailing support of our people, are ready to defend the integrity of our territory,” a junta representative said in a statement. A delegation from Niamey went to Mali asking for Russian-affiliated Wagner fighters to join the fight in the event of a Western-backed intervention.

An early resolution of the crisis around Niger is not to be expected. Niger is a key state in the fight against the jihadi network and is linked strategically and structurally to neighbouring Mali. And the situation in the Sahel region is escalating. This has profound implications for the crisis of statehood in West Africa as a whole.

American exceptionalism is not a universal panacea for existing ills. The Pentagon helped train at least one of the coup leaders in Niger — and those in Mali and Burkina Faso, which have promised to come to Niger’s defence. Yet, speaking from Niamey on Monday, the visiting US acting deputy secretary of state Victoria Nuland lamented that the coup leaders refused to allow her to meet with the ousted president Mohamed Bazoum and were unreceptive to US calls to return the country to civilian rule.

Nuland’s mission aimed at dissuading the coup leaders from engaging with the Wagner group but she was unsure of success. Nuland was not granted a meeting with General Tchiani.

https://www.indianpunchline.com/niger-r ... sed-order/

******

HISTORY OF ECOWAS MILITARY INTERVENTIONS IN AFRICA
7 Aug 2023 , 3:52 pm .

Image
The Economic Community of West African States consists of 15 countries (Photo: EFE)

On July 26, a coup took place in Niger. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) held an emergency meeting where a plan of military action against the new government was proposed. In case the demand to restore the previous administration within the agreed timeframe (one week) is not met, he gave the Niger army one week to hand over power.

"Such measures may include the use of force. For this purpose, the defense chiefs ECOWAS staff will meet immediately," a statement from the meeting emphasized, Sputnik collects .

For its part, the National Council for the Restoration of Democracy (CNRD), led by General Abdourahamane Tchiani, rejected the ultimatum and denounced that the organization acts in collaboration with Western powers.

ECOWAS has a record of successful military interventions. Its military arm was formed in 1990 to regularly intervene in conflicts within West Africa. Some of his notable interventions listed were in:

Liberia (1990-1996)
Sierra Leone (1997-2000)
Guinea-Bissau (1999)
Ivory Coast (2002-2011)
Mali (2013)
Gambia (2017)

The operations in Liberia were led by scandals of abuses against the human rights of the ECOWAS troops, their participation deepened the conflict in the Ivory Coast, after their intervention in Mali, the center and north of the country were invaded by militants linked to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. In general, where the armed wing of ECOWAS has passed , the conflicts do not abate, quite the contrary.

While ECOWAS has said that it is prepared to use all means necessary to restore democracy in Niger, it has also expressed its willingness to enter into dialogue with the CNRD.

https://misionverdad.com/historial-de-i ... -en-africa

Google Translator

******

Latin America and West Africa: Patterns of Neocolonialism
Posted by INTERNATIONALIST 360° on AUGUST 7, 2023
Stephen Sefton

Image

The patterns of neocolonial intervention in the majority world by the United States and its allies since their victories over Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan in 1945 are very clear. Almost immediately the Western countries started a cycle of bloody aggression against peoples resisting colonialism, followed later by the dependence of most African and Asian countries on the ruthless Western economic system. In all this time, the United States and Europe demonstrated the most crude and brutal determination to guarantee at all costs control of the natural resources required by their capitalist system. Until the developments of recent years, they were able to achieve their goal through commercial and financial domination at the global level and, at the regional level, political co-optation of local elites. Whenever they have found it necessary, they have never hesitated to use military aggression either directly or indirectly.

However, in the last twenty-five years, the old imperialist regime imposed by the American and European powers has entered into crisis. It is instructive to make the comparison between the contemporary history of West Africa and Latin America and the Caribbean. This is a period that began approximately with the election of our Eternal Comandante Hugo Chávez Frías in 1998 as president of Venezuela and our comrade Laurent Gbagbo as president of the Ivory Coast in 2000. Both leaders promoted socialist ideas that threatened the customary imperial control of their respective regions.

In both cases, the Western powers mounted campaigns to destabilize the new governments with repeated attacks and interventions of one kind or another. The intensification of the imperial aggression reached its peak in 2011 with the destruction of the Libyan Jamahiriya and the assassination of Brother Guide Muammar al Gaddafi; with the French attack in Ivory Coast to overthrow Laurent Gbagbo, with the treacherous complicity of the United Nations, and also the beginning of unilateral coercive measures by the United States against Venezuela and its oil company PDVSA. The institutional context of both regions of the world contains very similar components.

In Latin America and the Caribbean, the Organization of American States has served as the United States Ministry of Colonies since 1948. But in West Africa, it was not until the 1970s that the countries of the region completed their independence from the colonial powers, France, the United Kingdom and Portugal. So, it was not until 1975 that the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) was founded. The ostensible objective of both institutions – the OAS and ECOWAS – is to promote regional cooperation, socio-economic development and political stability. In both cases, the dominant influence of the respective Western powers has distorted the practice of the institutions so that they serve in effect as tools of imperial regional control.

Throughout its history, the OAS has given its institutional support to imperial rule in the region, from supporting the 1954 coup in Guatemala and the exclusion of revolutionary Cuba to the illegal recognition of Juan Guaidó to represent Venezuela. After Cuba, only Venezuela and Nicaragua have had the courage to refuse to be members of this neocolonial institution. In the case of ECOWAS, while it is true that none of the former colonial powers is an actual member, France, and therefore the European Union, wields great influence because it dominates one of the main economic components of ECOWAS, the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) and also because most of the countries of the region use the CFA Franc currency, a direct inheritance from the colonial era.

The scope of ECOWAS has expanded beyond its original goal of “collective self-sufficiency” in a way similar to the development of the OAS, to now include the organization of peacekeeping missions in its member countries and the promotion of Western-style electoral democracy. ECOWAS now has a total population of over 440 million with a Gross Domestic Product of almost two trillion dollars (PPP). (It should be noted that if Nigeria’s oil wealth is subtracted that GDP drops dramatically to only US$600 billion indicating the relative poverty of the region). Almost all of the ECOWAS governments have faithfully fulfilled their neocolonial role in relation to the recent military insurrection in Niger, which has broad support among that country’s population, as is also the case with the other recent similar military insurrections in Guinea in 2021, Burkina Faso in 2022 and Mali in 2020.

The reasons for these coups include the presence of French and American military personnel on national territory, systemic corruption for the benefit of a small national elite and their foreign owners, and the lack of social and economic development for the population in general. However, perhaps even more urgently than these other factors has been the development of pseudo-Islamist terrorist forces such as Boko Haram and Al Qaeda of the Islamic Maghreb (AQMI) as a destabilizing factor in the entire region. In fact, the immediate origin of this component of regional instability was the destruction of Libya in 2011 and the consequent destabilization of the huge northern territory of Mali after the massacre in January 2012 of more than 100 Malian soldiers in the village of Aguelhok by terrorist movements.

In response to the lack of support from its government to defend its territory, the Malian army took power in a very similar way to what has just happened in Niger. A Committee for the Return of Democracy and the Restoration of the State was appointed. As now in the case of Niger, ECOWAS implemented economic coercive measures and threatened possible military intervention. Then came an agreement mediated by the United Nations, among others, and the intervention of a French military force. As in Niger this year (where the military has formed a National Council for Defense of the Nation), the 2020 military insurrection in Mali was largely a reaction against the presence of the French military. The fundamental difference between the events of 2012 and 2013 in Mali and the situation now ten years later is the united front agreed between Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Guinea, all ECOWAS member countries.

In this context, Guinea’s action could be crucial because its support for its three land-locked neighbors gives them access to commercial transit through the important port of Conakry, the capital of Guinea. Whereas in previous years, ECOWAS was always able to put more intense pressure and with greater ease on military insurrections in Burkina Faso or Mali, and now in Niger, because these countries lack access to the sea. The militaries of all four countries have concluded that the US and French military presence promotes neither stability nor security and, moreover, they suspect that the imperialist powers themselves covertly and indirectly support the terrorist forces they are supposedly fighting. Certainly, in 2012 a close Western ally at the time, Qatar, sent planes with armaments for the pseudo-Islamist groups via the city of Gao in northern Mali.

In West Africa, the recent military uprisings have been in support of nationalist and popular demands in the context of this counterproductive foreign military occupation and the cynicism of the predatory Western powers. In Latin America only Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela, the only countries to have rejected the OAS, have anti-imperialist armed forces defending their governments. The United States and its NATO allies have more than 70 military bases throughout the region, with most concentrated in Central America and the Caribbean, thus encircling Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua. As in Africa, this regional military occupation is camouflaged under the spurious motif of security cooperation.

As in Africa too, this imperialist military harassment of the region goes hand in hand with endless pressure from giant Western energy and mining multinationals to ensure they get priority in controlling the region’s natural resources. It is also about ensuring the imposition of inappropriate economic priorities through international and regional financial institutions. Both the United States and the European Union are now intensifying their focus on Latin America and West Africa because they are afraid of losing their customary control over the natural resources of these regions to governments which, first, prioritize the needs and aspirations of their own peoples and, secondly, for the same reason want to seal more favorable agreements with China and Russia. This is the fundamental dynamic that will define the successful development of a genuine new world order.

It is a dynamic in which the corporate elites of the United States and the European Union will not be able to prevail because they still think they can to impose their interests over the needs and aspirations of the peoples of the majority world whom they want to continue marginalizing. They think they can forever keep entire populations in political impotence and economic distress by means of endless psychological warfare and its corollary, spreading malicious calumny to promote division and disunity. Many examples show how demented this assumption has become, whether the rejection in a country like Argentina of its subjugation to Western financial structures or the determined popular resistance in Haiti to systematic institutional destruction and grotesque exploitation by local private sector and foreign corporate predators.

Also relevant is Cuba’s heroic resistance to the genocidal US blockade and too, Venezuela’s and Nicaragua’s resistance to coup attempts and to constant US and EU provocation and intimidation or, elsewhere, the resistance to the coups in Bolivia and Peru. The advance of the political right in the region between 2015 and 2022 was brief and fragile. The Latin American and Caribbean nations continue the unstoppable development of their relations with the People’s Republic of China. All this is also reflected in the development of various similar events in West Africa. Resistance to the empire is inevitable among the peoples of the majority world who live the reality of all these processes. As our President Comandante Daniel noted in 2021,”Those countries that still dream of imposing their colonialist, neocolonialist policies on the world are simply out of touch with reality. That’s not possible anymore.”

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2023/08/ ... lonialism/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 10771
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Africa

Post by blindpig » Wed Aug 09, 2023 2:20 pm

From Niger to Poland
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 08/09/2023

Image

Last week, analysts, journalists who are considered serious and some Ukrainian government official confirmedthat Russia was the hand that pulled the strings in the overthrow of the Government of Niger, a surprising achievement considering the non-existent Russian presence in the country, where there are, on the contrary, important French and American military bases. In a somewhat more realistic tone, Antony Blinken, Secretary of State of the United States, affirmed yesterday that "what happened, and what continues to happen in Niger, was not instigated by Russia or by Wagner, but they have tried to take advantage of it." . Like the current Nigerien junta, the Malian and Burkinabé governments, born from the double processes of coup d'état in which they overthrew the previous coup attempt, have created their discourse around the rejection of the old metropolis, France, on the ground in tasks similar to those of the United States to fight against the jihadism that ravages the border between the three countries. In this context of rejection of the French military presence - there is not such a marked reaction against the United States, possibly because its only important presence is in isolated areas of Niger and its tasks are not to monitor and act on the ground as it was of France -, the Russian flags have been habitual in the mobilizations favorable to those three governments. Simply a symbol of rejection of France and the search for an alternative to the failure of the former colonial power in its mission to improve the security situation, these Russian symbols have been considered sufficient proof to allege hidden intentions of Moscow in its drive to control the Sahel.

The Western presence in the area is strategic for three reasons: immigration control, containment of jihadism so that it does not spread to the north and end up affecting Europe, and the fight between great powers. In a repeat of the 19th century Great Game in which the British Empire foughtAgainst Russia in Central Asia Faced with the imagined possibility of a Russian invasion of India across the Pamirs, the West says it now faces the possibility of the Sahel countries falling into Russia's orbit. In this fight of great powers, which in reality can only be against China, since Russia has neither the presence nor the economic potential to be the threat that is being built at the media level, Wagner's presence is essential. Russia cannot, in economic terms, pose a threat to the Western or Chinese presence, but it can offer its services, or those of Evgeny Prigozhin's private army, to carry out the security tasks that until now were carried out by the Western military led by France . The fear that this military presence,

The hysteria created by the appearance of Russian flags in a country, Niger, where Russia has no military presence but which is a red line for the West, which has strategic assets it cannot afford to lose, has created an excellent media opportunity. for Evgeny Prigozhin. Much more skilful in managing communication than the Russian government, which has limited itself to commenting on the situation by appealing to dialogue and describing it as an internal matter, Prigozhin has rescued the anti-colonial discourse to denounce the Western plundering of African natural resources, a looting in which he has participated in other African countries such as Sudan or the Central African Republic. And faced with the possibility of a military intervention by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Wagner's owner has already offered his company's services to Niger. Logistical difficulties and the presence of US military bases make this hypothetical short-term presence difficult, irrelevant aspects when it comes to creating the discourse.

It is clear that Russia is not behind the coup in Niger, just as it was not in Mali or Burkina Faso, but the presence of Russian flags allows it to project the image of a presence and influence beyond its borders far superior to the real one. . Something similar occurs with Evgeny Prigozhin, for whom the alarmism about Wagner's power and control in countries where he has a presence and in which he does not, serves as a basis for presenting his army as a much more relevant and fearsome force. than it has been up to now.

As in the Sahel, the Central African Republic or Sudan, Wagner is useful in generating a discourse in Europe as well. The excessive prominence achieved by the troops in the first half of this year in the battle for Artyomvosk, in which they did not fight alone, but did have a media machine that made it seem so, has managed to make Wagner an entity with which to justify all kinds of of measures generating an alarm in which Prigozhin knows how to move perfectly. "The head of the Wagner group says that the US could recognize the military junta that led the coup in Niger to prevent the presence of mercenaries in the country," reported the EFE agency yesterday.

This is not the only impossible confrontation that Wagner and his related media are currently exploiting. And the African threatPrigozhin's army is not the only alarm they warn their enemies about. Over the past few weeks, the Baltic countries and Poland have also exploited the Russian threat, always to achieve clear goals that have little to do with the Russian private military company. Since the failed mutiny in June, a relevant part of Wagner's troops have arrived in Belarus, as agreed in negotiations with which the Kremlin wanted to end the crisis. The company handed over its heavy equipment to the Ministry of Defense and a part of its employees was sent home on vacation until August 9 while another part began to move to the improvised base by the Belarusian authorities in the vicinity of Minsk. Since then, Wagner's troops have been seen instructing or carrying out joint exercises with the Belarusian army, which does not have the combat experience of its new instructors and with whom President Lukashenko aspires to improve military preparation. Faced with the false theory defended by a part of the pro-Russian media sector, which wanted to see in the transfer of Wagner to Minsk, a short distance from Kiev, a future offensive on the Ukrainian capital, that is not where the threat of his presence.

As in the case of Niger, where Evgeny Prigozhin has wanted to create reasonable doubt about whether Wagner could one day appear protecting Tiani in Niamey, also in the Belarusian case, the threat is being used by both parties . . Except for Estonia, which does not seem to have gotten the message about the possibility of using Wagner to demand more NATO military presence on the eastern flank.Both Lithuania and Latvia and especially Poland have actively used the situation to justify measures that have little to do with Prigozhin's army. Warsaw, which is taking advantage of the situation of the war to increase military spending and rearm to become a military power within the European Union -a measure of pressure against Germany that joins the economic pressures against its Western ally- has already warned of the danger of Wagner's presence in the neighboring country from the moment the agreement was announced, even before the soldiers began to arrive.

https://slavyangrad.es/2023/08/09/de-ni ... more-27890

Google Translator

******

ESSAY: Why Africa Must Unite, Kwame Nkrumah, 1963
Editors, The Black Agenda Review 09 Aug 2023

Image

More than sixty years ago, Nkrumah told us why it was important that Africa unite. Today, his message and roadmap for Pan-African unity is needed more than ever.

For some, the idea of Pan-Africanism is a caricature or cliche: at best, it is an unthinking and aesthetized celebratory account of the cultural connections between Black folk worldwide; at worst is the inevitable and existential failure of African unity, the invariably and cynical end game of the so-called “diaspora wars.” Of course, both versions are not only wrong, but mistaken in their focus. For, as Kwame Nkrumah brilliantly reminds us, Pan-Africanism is a practical and necessary relationship among Africans and, in particular, recently decolonized African nations. Nkrumah’s Pan-Africanism is primarily a political economy of African union that can ward off those vultures, the ex-colonial powers, and bolster African sovereignty and independence.

In an essay titled “Why Africa Must Unite,” published almost sixty years ago in the premier issue of the journal Africa and the World, Nkrumah not only outlined his vision for a union of African states, but enumerated the reasons that such a union was necessary to promote African development. The basis of his argument was a critique of neocolonialism - the attempts by the US and Europe to control the resources and wealth of nominally independent African states. For Nkrumah, there was both strength in numbers and power in geography. A united front of African states could prevent balkanization and re-colonization, repel the NATO assault on Africa, and control the wealth and riches of the continent. At the same time, the self-contained nature of the continent created a logical basis for a shared communications, transportation, monetary, and industrial infrastructure. While desiring to promote cooperation among African states in areas such as mining and agriculture, Nkrumah also saw the importance of “common action” in defense, foreign policy, and economic development — including a common currency for Africa that would break dependence on the dominant Sterling and franc zones.

It’s often said — dating back to Marcus Garvey’s vision of a United States of Africa — that such Pan-African unions are impossible. But if the recent actions in Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso and elsewhere are a sign of things to come, neocolonialism may finally die so that Nkrumah’s dream of Pan-Africa may live. Indeed, as Nkrumah told us:

It is not one empire which is expiring, but the whole system of imperialism which is at bay. It is not individual communities, but the whole of humanity which is demanding a different and better way of life for the world’s growing millions.

Greater revolutions have created mighty nations and empires, and the waves of those revolutions lap the shores of Africa no less than they do those of other continents.

We reprint “Africa Must Unite” below.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Africa Must Unite

Kwame Nkrumah

Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, President of Ghana, is the foremost advocate of African unity. He was a leading participant in the 5th Pan-African Congress in Manchester in 1945. Ever since he has fought for this great creative project – in speeches, articles, books, and by organizing international conferences. Here, once again, Nkrumah sets out the fundamental arguments for a Union Government of Africa and warns of the dangers which will result from further delay. - Editor.

The decisions which are now made in Africa will not only influence the lives of the two hundred and eighty million inhabitants of our continent today; they will influence the course of events for countless generations of Africans yet unborn.

A monumental decision was taken when the Organization of African Unity was founded.

Yet, despite the measure of unity which has been achieved, the historical conditions in which African independence has emerged and the concrete manifestations of our weakness and difficulties, call for immense radical and urgent measures which the Addis Ababa Conference did not fulfill.

It is not single states or single continents which are undergoing decolonization, but the greater portion of the world. It is not one empire which is expiring, but the whole system of imperialism which is at bay.

It is not individual communities, but the whole of humanity which is demanding a different and better way of life for the world’s growing millions.

Greater revolutions have created mighty nations and empires, and the waves of those revolutions lap the shores of Africa no less than they do those of other continents.

Great technological and industrial revolutions have transformed the economies of large portions of the world.

A revolution in communications brings knowledge of every change in the world to the remotest corners of our continent. The world will not wait – nor will it move step by step, however much we may wish this.

It is against a background of great political, social, cultural, scientific and technological revolutions that the emergence of African independence and the development of Africa must be viewed.

Time is the crucial factor, for time acts for those who use it with purpose, and not for those who let it slip by. Those who do not use time as their agent, give the advantage to those who do.

When the O.A.U. was founded last year, the world was at the beginning of an era of peaceful co-existence.

The risk of a World War was abating and the prospect of peaceful cooperation between the Great Powers appears to bring to an end the struggle of foreign influences in Africa.

We embraced non-alignment in order to escape involving ourselves in the prevailing cold war politics.

New Upsurge

Instead, however, we have witnessed a menacing upsurge of imperialism and a revival of colonialism itself in Africa, and foreign interference and subversion in the internal affairs of our African states.

The one essential factor which united us at Addis Ababa – the overriding factor which made all differences and difficulties seem trivial and irrelevant – was the need to free that part of our continent which is still in the grip of imperialism.

Yet in spite of our Charter, in spite of our resolutions, in spite of our common front at the United Nations and in other international gatherings what have we witnessed?

Far from deterring the imperialists and neocolonialists from giving support to the apartheid regime in South Africa and to the fascist regime in Portugal, the NATO Powers have poured and are pouring vast sums of money and vast armaments into the apartheid regime of South Africa and Portugal.

Not only is South Africa being assisted to grow stronger economically and militarily, but the cruelty, repression and exploitation of our African brothers have reached new heights.

By raising a threat at Addis Ababa and not being able to take effective action against apartheid and colonialism, we have worsened the plight of our kinsmen in Angola, Mozambique, Southern Rhodesia and South Africa.

We have frightened the imperialists sufficiently to strengthen their defenses and repression in Southern Africa, but we have not frightened them enough to abandon apartheid supremacy to its ill-fated doom.

Task Harder

It must be said that by merely making resolutions on African Unity, and not achieving our goal of a Union Government of Africa, we have made our task of freeing the rest of the AFrican continent harder and no easier.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization powers have not deterred one white from sending all the arms needed by the Salazaar regime to keep down our kinsmen in its colonies.

The Portuguese fascist regime has not made a single move has not made a single move to negotiate with the United Nations or with the nationalist forces.

It has become more insolent, more mendacious and more repressive since the Conference in Addis Ababa.

What has gone wrong?

The imperialists regard our Charter of Unity as token unity; they will not respect it until it assumes the form of a Union Government.

It is incredible that they will defy a united Continent. But it is easy to understand that they do not believe that we will be able to accomplish the next stage–to organize and centralize our economic and military and political forces to wage a real struggle against apartheid. Portuguese fascism and those who support these evils with trade, investment and arms.

We have not yet made the imperialists believe that we can set our continent in order as a mighty economic force, capable of standing together as a united and progressive people.

Serious border disputes have broken out and disturbed our continent since the O.A.U. was formed. Fortunately, good sense and African solidarity have prevailed in all those instances. But the disputes have been smothered, not settled.

The artificial divisions of African States are too numerous and irrational for real permanent and harmonious settlements to be reached, except within the framework of a Continental Union.

How, for example, can we prevent the people of Western Somalia, whose livelihood is in cattle-grazing from continuing to look for fresh fields for grazing by traveling beyond traditional barriers without bringing them into clashes with their compatriots in Ethiopia?

And yet, in a united Africa, Ethiopian land and Somalian [sic] land, even though they may be separately sovereign within the framework of a Union Government of Africa, will belong to a common pool which would assist the general development of cattle-rearing in that part of our continent, because threw would be no artificial barriers to such development. The benefit of the development will be for the benefit of both Ethiopian and Somalia.

A real danger is that border disputes will grow with the economic development and national strengthening of the African States as separate balkanized governmental units.

That was the historical process of independent states in other continents. We cannot expect Africa, with its legacy of artificial borders, to follow any other course, unless we make a positive effort to arrest that danger now; and we can do so only under a Union Government.

History’s Warning

History has shown that where the Great Powers cannot colonize they balkanise. This is what they did to the Austro-Hungarian Empire and this is what they have done and are doing in Africa.

If we allow ourselves to be balkanized, we shall be re-colonized and be picked off one after the other.

NOW is the time for Africa’s political and economic unification.

By far the greatest wrong which the departing colonialists inflicted on us, and which we now continue to inflict on ourselves, was to leave us divided into economically unavailable States which bear no possibility of real development.

As long as the chief consideration of the industrial nations was our raw materials at their prices, this policy made sense for them, if not for us.

Now that their technological impetus is such that they need Africa even more as a market for their manufactured goods than as a source of raw materials, our economic backwardness no longer makes sense for them any more than for us.

They now need vaster and more prosperous markets for heavy agricultural tractors and electronic machines. They are concerned to sell to us, not merely day-by-day consumer goods or even things like motorcars, but the latest in supersonic jets and atomic-powered merchant vessels.

Re-Thinking

There is much rethinking on this score among the industrially-advanced countries, although their outlook is obscured because their economies are still geared to monopolistic devices for getting hold of our oil and gas deposits, uranium, gold, diamonds, and other raw materials cheap, and selling their manufactured goods back to us at exorbitant prices.

The poverty of the developing world has become a blot on the ethics and commonsense of the industrial nations.

The recent United Nations Conference on Trade and Development was not organized by accident or solely by pressure from the developing nations.

The growing economic gap between the two worlds spells misery for the developing countries but it also threatens the industrialized nations with unemployment and with dangerous recessions and economic explosion.

We have reason to think that the imperialists themselves are in divided councils about the Unity of Africa. They must remain ambivalent, however, as long as they retain direct control over Southern Africa and neocolonialist control of the Congo.

But a Union Government of Africa would end the dilemma of the industrialized nations, because inevitably that wealth will be converted into capital for the development of Africa.

The fact that imperialism and neocolonialism are in that dilemma should be for us the clearest indication of the course we must follow. We must unite for economic viability, first of all, and then to recover our material wealth in Southern Africa, so that our vast resources and capacity for development will bring prosperity for us and additional benefits for the rest of the world.

That is why I have written elsewhere that the emancipation of Africa could be the emancipation of Man.

Is there any need to point out again that Africa is potentially the world’s richest continent, not only in mineral wealth, but also in hydro-electric power?

The wealth of the Sahara is as yet untapped; the waters and river of Tanganyika and Ethiopia are as yet unharnessed.

Capital Exists

All the capital we need for the development of these regions flows out of Africa today in gold, diamonds, copper, uranium and other minerals from Southern Africa, Northern Rhodesia, the Congo and other parts of the continent.

Every year in the Sahara and in other parts of Africa, new stores of mineral , chemical, and petroleum wealth are discovered.

All that is lacking in Africa is the will and courage to unite a divided but compact continent.

We in Africa are living in the most momentous era of our history. In a little less than one decade the majority of the territories in our continent have emerged from colonialism into sovereignty and independence.

In a few years from now, we can envisage that all Africa will be free from colonial rule. Nothing can stem our onward march to independence and freedom.

While we have cause to rejoice in this achievement, our central problem as Independent States is the fragmentation of our territories into little independent States and of our policies and programmes into a patchwork of conflicting objectives and uncoordinated development and plans.

While the post-war years have seen a phenomenal rise in the prices of manufactured goods which we need to sustain progress and development in our States, the prices of the raw material which we export have shown an alarmingly steady decline.

So the disparity between the “haves” or the highly developed nations and the “have-notes” or developing nations, becomes inevitably wider and wider as our needs grow greater and greater.

How can we resolve this tragic paradox, except by uniting our forces and working together in Africa as a team?

Disputes

Yet, during the period between the two O.A.U. conferences of Heads of State, we experienced clashes between Algeria and Morocco, between Somalia and Ethiopia and between Somalia and Kenya; we experienced military upheavals and mutinies in Tanganyika, Uganda and Kenya; and we experienced confusion, frustration and tragedy in the Congo.

Because of our inability to bring our brothers in the Congo the assistance they needed, there were internal disagreements and discord, endless maneuvering for positions among the political leaders, the tragedy of fratricidal strife, and, on the other hand, foreign intervention and pressure, intrigues, and coercion, subversion and cajolery.

In all this confusion, the power of imperialism has a fertile ground. It even dares us to use openly certain African States to promote its selfish plans for the exploitation and degradation of the Congo.

We are unable to hold back foreign intrigues, because we are divided among ourselves. None of us is free and none of us can be safe, while there is frustration and instability in any part of this continent.

There is this political and military instability. Our economic weakness and subservience is self-evident.

Same Pattern

All over Africa the existential economic pattern developed under colonialism remains. Not one of us, despite our political independence, has yet succeeded in breaking in any substantial measure, our economic subservience to economic systems external to Africa.

It is the purpose of neocolonialism to maintain this economic relationship.

In many cases our most valuable raw materials – such as minerals – are owned and exploited by foreign companies. Larger parts of the wealth of Africa, which could be used for the economic development of Africa, are drained out of the continent in this way to bolster the economies of the developed nations.

The whole world is poised at a delicate economic balance and economic collapse in any one part of the world would have great repercussions on us.

Our citation in Africa is so weak that we are bound to be the first and the worst sufferers if economic difficulties should set in in Europe or America, and the effect upon us would be absolute and catastrophic.

We have nothing to fall back on. We have become so utterly dependent upon those outside economic systems that we have no means of resistance in external economic fluctuations. We have no economic resilience whatsoever within our own continent.

We are so cut off from one another that in many cases the road system in each of our countries peters out into bush as they approach the frontier of our neighborhood.

How can we trade amongst ourselves when we do not even have proper means of physical communications? It is not possible to travel by air from Accra to London in six hours. I can fly from Accra to Nairobi or from Accra to Cairo in half a day.

It is easy for us to get together to talk. But on the ground over which we fly with such ease and nonchalance, it is frequently impossible to engage in the most elementary trade simply because there are no proper roads, and because we are artificially divided and balkanized.

Our few and negligible roads and railways lead, ultimately, to some port. In a sense they have become symbols of our economic subservience and our dependence on trade outside the African continent.

We have inherited from colonialism an economic pattern from which it is difficult to escape.

Great forces are arrayed to block our escape. When individually we try to find some economic independence, pressures are brought against us that are often irresistible owing to our disunity.

I am not arguing that we should cut off all economic relationships with countries outside Africa. I am not saying that we should spurn foreign trade and reject foreign investment.

What I am saying is that we should get together, think together and organize our African economy as a unity, and negotiate our general continental economic planning. Only in this way can we negotiate economic arrangements on terms fair to ourselves.

Unity Now

The Organization of African Unity was a declaration of intention to unite. It was an optimistic beginning. But we need more than this. We must unite NOW under a Union Government if this intention is to have any meaning and relevance.

To say that a Union Government for Africa is premature is to sacrifice Africa on the altar of neo-colonialism.

When we went to Geneva to seek fair play and justice in international trade, there were no less than seventy-five of us in one group set against a few of the great industrialized countries of Europe and the United States.

Yet how weak was our bargaining power because of our political and economic disunity and divisions!

How much more effective would our efforts have been if we had spoken with the one voice of Africa’s millions! With all our mineral and waterpower and fertile lands, is it not a cause for shame that we remain poor and content to plead for aid from the very people who have robbed us of our riches in the past?

I see no way out of our present predicament except through the force and power of a Union Government of Africa. By this I do not mean the abrogation of any sovereignty. I seek no regional unions as a basis for unity.

Indeed, the more independent states there are within our Union Government, the stronger will be our unity, and the freer will be each sovereign state within the Union to attend to its specific and exclusive problems.

Specific Fields

The specific fields of common action I have in mind are Defence, Foreign Policy and Economic Development (including a common currency for Africa).

In this way, instead of a Charter which operates on the basis of peripatetic or widely-separated commissions under the control of an administrative secretariat without political direction, we shall have a government for joint action in three fields of our governmental activity.

Let me refer again to the pattern of economic structure which we inherited from colonialism. Under colonial rule, we were encouraged to produce a limited number of primary commodities, mainly agriculture and mineral, for export overseas. Capital for development was owned by foreigners and profits were vigorously transferred abroad.

A trade pattern of this sort stagnated the rest of our national economy, and our resources remained undeveloped. In consequence, indigenous capital formation was negligible, leaving all our communities in a state of abject poverty.

Since independence, we have been demanding energetic efforts to reverse and overhaul these unsatisfactory features in our economy. In some of the Independent African States great efforts have been made to relax traditional economic links with the ex-colonial Powers, but none of us can say we have succeeded in breaking those dangerous links completely.

Another handicap which we suffered from colonialism was the restriction of our economies which has hampered economic development in many ways.

The very fact that all the Independent African states produce and maintain development plans is an indication of our deep concern for realizing nationalist aspirations and improving the conditions of living of our people.

But however deep our concern, however strong our determination, these development plans will avail us nothing if the necessary capital is not available.

This capital, as we all know, is everywhere desperately short. The men with the know-how are few and scattered. It is by coming together and pooling our resources that we can find a solution to this problem.

Unified Planning

In other words, only by unified economic planning on a continental basis with a central political direction within a Union Government can we hope to meet this economic challenge.

It takes millions of pounds to build the basic industries, irrigation and power plants which will enable us to escape from our present economic stagnation.

Our various individual, separate, balkanized States cannot mobilise the enormous amounts of money required for these major projects and industrial complexes.

We cannot bargain effectively for the essential funds from foreign sources on the best possible terms.

What we are doing now is to compete between ourselves for the little capital available from foreign sources.

In our scramble to get this capital we grant foreign firms extensive and lucrative concessions for the exploitation of our natural resources. These exacerbate the colonial patterns of our economy.

We invest more in raw materials than in industrial development, and the continued drain abroad of profits which should have been invented in economic development retards the progress of our industrial plans.

In a continental federal union, we could easily mobilise the amount of capital available to the African States by the establishment of a Central Monetary Development Finance Bank.

Already our various States have agreed to form an African Development Bank. This, however, cannot succeed without a continental economic plan and without the necessary political direction which only a Union GOvernment of Africa can provide.

An African Monetary Development Bank of the kind I envisage would enable us to formulate continental agreements concerning the terms of loans and investments by foreign interest.

Together, we could bargain more effectively with foreign firms and Governments for investments and loans for the kind of industries WE desire and not those THEY desire.

We could bargain on the terms of these loans and we could ensure that the increased sayings which would arise from continental development of Africa’s huge resources would enable us to develop even more rapidly.

Stop Competing

The unnecessary competition amongst us for capital would cease and moreover we could work up continental tariff policies designed to protect newly developed African industries.

The great risks involved in investing in our individual countries would be reduced, for in an African economic union our development projects would be backed by all the African states.

Another grave economic danger which drives us against one another is that (because our national development plans are not co-ordinated) as the general conditions of our economies are similar in all the Independent African States, this can only lead to a concomitant expansion of our separate productive capacities in excess of the quantity which can be profitably marked either internally or abroad.

The Danger

The certain result is that we shall establish cut-throat competition amongst ourselves with heavy financial losses to our respective economies.

The problem of African Unity must therefore be examined against the background of the economic position of the Independent African States, our aspirations for rapid development and the difficulties with which we are confronted in our separate existence.

If we examine these problems carefully, we cannot evade the conclusion that the movement towards African political unity will substantially and immediately contribute to the solution of the economic problems of the Independent African States.

Indeed, African Unity based on a continental Union Government is the only, I repeat only, possible framework within which the economic difficulties of Africa can be successfully and satisfactorily settled.

Indispensable

The appeal for a Union Government of Africa is therefore not being made merely to satisfy a political end. It is absolutely indispensable for our economic survival in the modern world.

We must remember that just as we had to obtain political independence from colonial rule as a necessary prerequisite for establishing new and progressive communities for our respective Stats, so we cannot achieve economic stability in Africa as a whole without the prerequisite of a continental Union Government.

Indeed, we cannot hope to sustain the economic development of Africa without first accepting the necessity for a continental division of labour to ensure that particular states specialized in their respective fields for which geographical, economic and social factors make them the most suitable, can develop to their fullest capacity with the best interest of the continent as a whole in mind.

Take, for example, the steel industry. This could be developed to the highest possible limit in Nigeria, Egypt or Mauretania, or Liberia or Ghana, to mention only a few instances. If we do not unite under a federal government, it is clear that each of the states mentioned will wish in their own national interests to pursue the possibility of establishing and expanding its own steel mill.

Indeed, this is already being done by some of us to the benefit, profit, and gain of foreign concerns.

If, however, our resources were combined to set up steel mills on a continental basis, at strategically chosen points in Africa, we would be in a position to make the greatest possible contribution to the industrial progress of the whole continent.

Without a conscious effort based on a common governmental programme, we cannot hope to achieve this end. We might even find ourselves using the resources of one area of Africa to retard the progress and development of one or more other areas by cut-throat competition.

The most casual glance at our continent should convince anyone that the price of our disunity is continued exploitation from abroad and foreign interference in our internal matters. No matter where we look in the continent, we will find that, to a greater or lesser degree, the same pattern of exploitation persists.

For example: the economy of the Congo (Leopoldville) is still dominated by three foreign groups which represent Belgian, French, British and American interests. Herein lies the Congo’s tragedy.

Two foreign firms–The Rhodesian Anglo-American Corporation and the Rhodesian Selection Trust –control the mining output of Zambia. Copper makes up eighty to ninety percent of Zambia’s exports, yet profits and interest shipped abroad annually often amount to as high as half of Zambia’s total export earnings!

Thus, despite political independence, nearly all of us are unable to exploit our agricultural and mineral resources in our own interests. Under a strong union government we would have the material resources for rapid industrialisation, whereby all of us — big or small–would be benefited.

But so long as we are divided, we will, to this extent, remain colonies in an economic sense. We shall remain puppets and agents of neo-colonialism.

Currency Problems

The truth of this is even more evident when we examine monetary zones and customs unions. Most African States are still in monetary zones linked to the former colonial power.

One-fourth of these States are in the sterling zone and one-half are in the franc zone.

Owing to this currency arrangement, trade between the Independent African States is restricted and hampered. Indeed, Trade is practically impossible within this financial environment.

As long as the States of Africa remain divided, as long as we are forced to compete for foreign capital and to accept economic ties to foreign powers because in our separate entities we are two small, weak and inviable to “go it alone,” we will be unable to break the economic patterns of exploitation established in the days of outright colonialism.

What steps are necessary to form a Union Government?

My proposals which I put forward at the July OAU conference in Cairo are based on the following:

The Union Government shall consist of an Assembly of Heads of States and Governments, headed by a President elected from among the Heads of States and Governments of the Independent African States.

The Executive of the Union Government will be a Cabinet or Council of Ministers with a Chancellor or Prime Minister as its head, and a Federal House consisting of two Chambers – a Senate and a House of Representatives.

Those states which agree to form the Union Government should immediately designate their Foreign Ministers to constitute a Working Committee to draft the Constitution for the Federal Union Government of Africa.

Report in Six Months

Within six months, the Heads of States and Governments should meet at a place to be agreed upon, to adopt and proclaim to the world the Federal Union Government of Africa.

It has been said that “great things from little causes spring.” How true this saying is can be judged from the beginning of some of the world’s Great Powers of today.

The United States started with thirteen weak economically nonviable colonies exposed to serious political and economic hardships. Yet today the United States of America is a world power with not less than fifty constituent states.

The Soviet Union, whose scientists have astounded the world with their interplanetary exploits, began their Union amid untold hardships and difficulties with but three states. Today the Soviet Union is composed of sixteen federated states.

We in Africa cannot wait, we dare to wait, until we are encompassed by our doom for failing to seize the grand opportunity, rising to the call of Africa’s finest hour.

This is the challenge which history has thrust upon us. This is the mandate we have received from our people that we set about to create a Union Government for Africa now and this is also the challenge which Providence and destiny has thrust upon us. We cannot, we must not, we dare not fail or falter.

Kwame Nkrumah, “Why Africa Must Unite,” Africa and the World, vol. 1, no 1, October 1963, p. 11-16.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/essay ... rumah-1963

Eritrea: A Bright Spot on a Planet near the Edge of Armageddon
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor 09 Aug 2023

Image

Last week I attended the Eritrean American Festival in the Seattle/Tacoma area, at the Tacoma Convention Center, as did Black Agenda Report Executive Editor Margaret Kimberley and Breakthrough News Host and Producer Eugene Puryear. I arrived after they had spoken, on the day I was scheduled to speak at 6 pm. However, the festival was in disarray because diaspora dissidents attacked the festival in Sweden , so the Seattle festival was busy hiring extra security and taking extra precautions. The evening’s program started late, near the time when the dancing was to begin, so I didn’t speak that night.

At 6 am the next day, attackers tore down the festival tents outside the Marriott Hotel and scattered merchandise—Eritrean style dresses, t-shirts, flags, umbrellas, and the like. That afternoon protestors assaulted four people, some of whom were taken away in an ambulance. My speech was canceled while the community held an emergency meeting.

Eritrea is often called “the Cuba of Africa,” and the US has long been hostile to its alternative form of government and encouraged the diaspora dissidents who turned violent this year, in Seattle/Tacoma and in Canada and Europe.

This was the speech I would have given if the festival had not been disrupted by violence.


Hello thanks for having me again. I never can get the shoulder shimmy right, but I bought myself an umbrella to pump once the music starts instead.

Last night I made a few notes, then I read them and thought, “Eh, that’s not very good.” Then I decided that the main thing I want to do is quote President Isaias. I want to quote some of what we aired on Pacifica Radio broadcasts that I work on.

But before I do that . . . I was just watching video in shock as tents and cars burned at the Eritrean Festival in Sweden and one thousand attackers injured 52 innocent people. I called and asked a colleague on one of the Pacifica Radio broadcasts I work on whether she could get the basics and get it on a Monday newscast on KPFK-Los Angeles. I actually asked myself for a moment whether there could be any trouble like that here, but for some reason this happens in Europe, and I hope some of you here will be able to share some insight about that with me later so I can understand what we might need to report.

Now, setting that attack aside, I’m so glad to be here because Eritrea is one of the few bright spots on the planet right now. A few others include the emerging struggles for self-determination in West Africa, although as my plane took off this morning, I was wondering whether the US and France would be bombing Niger by the time it touched down or whether they’ll have managed to bully ECOWAS [Economic Community of West African States] into attacking four of their own, maybe starting a regional conflagration, by next week.

In any case I’m glad Eritrea is not among the nations who’ve called for the restoration of Niger’s puppet government.

I know you understand that electoral democracy is neither the only nor the most credible expression of popular will, especially in Africa where outside forces typically turn elections into selections of the puppets they want in power. When exiles have complained to me that Eritrea doesn’t hold elections, I say, “Oh, I’m so not sorry for you.” And in the one case I know of—Somalia—where one-person-one-vote elections would definitely represent popular will, the US has made sure they don’t have them .

Also, as I wrote in this week’s Black Agenda Report, Kenya and Rwanda have offered to put a Black face on a US-engineered re-invasion of occupied Haiti—to lock it down even tighter. Russia and China keep resisting on the UN Security Council, but this seems to be building to a point where the US will say it’s got enough willing pawns to go in even without UN Security Council approval. I’m glad Eritrea isn’t one of them.

Meanwhile, the US-Russia proxy war in Ukraine drags on with no end in sight, and the threat of a nuclear exchange keeps looming. In a few doom-dreaming moments I went to the Web and looked up “tactical” nuclear weapons to see just what the use of these things would look like.

They include gravity bombs, short-range missiles, artillery shells, land mines, depth charges, and torpedoes, all equipped with nuclear warheads. Who would have ever imagined nuclear artillery shells or land mines?

They also include nuclear armed ground-based or shipborne surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), and air-to-air missiles. Air-to-air means one plane bombing another, but in any case, if nuclear weapons are used, radioactive material will be released into the air, the soil, and the water, which don’t know national boundaries, and I can’t even imagine the suffering in Ukraine.

These “tactical” nuclear weapons can have yields several times that of the weapons used in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and they’re actually part of the conversation now. Actually using them is frequently discussed in the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Russia Today.

No one has a plan in place to de-escalate once two of the world’s great nuclear powers deploy “tactical” nuclear weapons, so this puts us all near the edge of Armageddon.

In the midst of all this insanity, it was so inspiring to see both Russia and China rolling out the red carpet for President Isaias at the end of May, and then to hear him standing so tall for Eritrea, a country free of IMF or World Bank debt, speaking so clearly and rationally.

We aired some of what he said on one of the Pacifica Radio shows I work on, but before that, my co-producer asked me, “Do you really think we should do this? Or do you think it’s too much?” She meant that it might cause complaint in this environment, where so much air time—even on Pacifica Radio—has been given over to mindlessly demonizing Russia.

I said, “Of course we should play it; we may have some Russia-obsessed fanatics in our midst here, but they’ll just have to live with it, and we don’t have any advertisers or corporate sponsors to answer to. Pacifica Radio is totally listener supported. This is just some of what he said that we put on the air:

“. . .This obsession of containing Russia was there for the last 30 years. It’s nothing new. If you are containing one nation not to grow, not to compete, not to be able to make its contributions, then you are declaring war.

“We had our position very clear. We said this is not the kind of old world order that the peoples of all continents need. Nobody needs these kinds of policies. Hegemony, control, and not allowing people to grow and work hard to change their quality of life. This idea of war in Ukraine or war between the Russian Federation and Ukraine is not true at all. This is war declared by NATO and Washington against the Russian Federation for the last 30 years. This has been going on and on and on for the last 30 years.

“How can you contain Russia? Not enable Russia to economically compete, not enable Russia to compete in technology, not allow Russia to compete in industries, not allow Russia to even have influence anywhere. If you have declared this war, then the war is there. It’s not a war between Russia and Ukraine.

“For that matter our position was clear. We were against this so-called global order or world order.

“We’ve been victims of these sanctions. It’s not just big nations or powerful nations like Russia, China or anybody else. But even those who don’t bow or kneel down to this ideology of hegemony will have to be punished. Sanctions, sanctions, sanctions. This declaration of war will have to end.”

Now I’ve got a few words of my own for these reprehensible sanctions. We all know that Eritrea is heavily sanctioned by the US and the West. The only reason it’s not as sanctioned as Russia is that it doesn’t have nearly so many exports and imports to sanction. None of those sanctions have been lifted even though the Ethiopian civil war is over. Some sanctions were imposed on Ethiopia and they haven’t yet been lifted either, but the most punishing of sanctions were imposed on Eritrea in November 2021, when it was excluded from the SWIFT system, used to conduct international financial transactions. That put Eritrea in the exclusive company of Iran and North Korea and then, as of February 2022, Russia.

The only thing further that the US could do would be to add Eritrea to the state sponsors of terrorism list along with Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Cuba, and we’ve got crackpot, neocon fanatics like Michael Rubin who argue for that.

At last year’s festival, a number of people asked me why the US won’t just let Eritrea live as a self-reliant, independent nation, and I said because the US is a hyper-militarized, capitalist, imperialist empire that will not, as President Isaias said, tolerate any nation that doesn’t bow down to its global hegemony.

I know that most of you have probably had opportunity here that you might not have had at home, and you may like your neighbors and your communities, but that’s the complexity we live with. The US may have been good for you, but it doesn’t want to let Eritrea live as it is.

I had the honor of speaking with President Isaias’s advisor Yemane Ghebreab about the sanctions when he was at the last UN General Assembly meeting. He told me about the creativity that Eritrea has to exercise to get around them. We also discussed some of the difficulties that those of you here may have sending money to family in Eritrea because of the sanctions, but as he said, where there’s a will, there’s a way.

Now back to President Isaias’s remarks. He said:

“This is not a war between Russia and Ukraine. This is a war declared by NATO, led by Washington, and Russia has a right to defend itself. Not alone. It’s not an isolated Russian case. This is a global issue, and we need an order, a global order or a world order, that enables everybody to share, cooperate. Complementarity will have to be there. You can’t contain someone, you can’t contain one nation. You can’t force or even use force, all sorts of coercion to subdue nations. This is not acceptable. This is the law of the jungle. We need to get out of this law of the jungle. And people will have to be free, live like human beings.

“No one nation has the right to come and impose its will on anybody else. And Russia had the right to defend itself. Russia is defending itself on behalf of everybody everywhere.”

We aired that on Pacifica Radio, and I’ve got family right here in Seattle who would think I was deranged if they heard it, but families are like that. They rarely agree on everything, and this country is blanketed in the propaganda that President Isaias was slicing through there.

He also said:

“So the question comes, what is the position of every nation as far as the imposition of sanctions on the Russian Federation or even declaring war against the Russian Federation? Our position was very clear. We are against containment. We are against the domination or hegemony of one nation. We can’t accept it. It’s not our specific case. It’s a case for everybody. Everybody, every nation, every people will have to make its position clear. And our support for the Russian Federation against these hegemonistic policies was a natural phenomenon or outcome of what we’ve done. So it’s not a matter of abstaining or supporting or not supporting. It’s a matter of taking a position on this phenomenon, US global hegemony.”

I can’t do any better than President Isaias, so I’m just going to end by repeating that Eritrea is such a bright spot on the planet right now. Thank you again for asking me to be here with you.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/eritr ... armageddon
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply