Re: Russia today
Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2017 8:39 pm
WELL THIS AND REBUILDING IN THE DOOR STUDIES
Igor Strelkov announced a complete refusal to cooperate with Boldyrev and Grudinin
-
In fact, there is nothing to comment on: not one of my claims to his actions, nor to the words of Grudinin - Boldyrev did not answer "from the word in general."
https://vk.com/igoristrelkov?w=wall347260249_229865
HERE YOU AND THE RESERVATION IN THE DOOR STARTS The
discord in the emerging coalition of red and white patriots is now becoming completely ruinous.
I am writing these lines not as a party functionary, but as a private person. As an observer.
Yes, the loss of Igor Strelkov Pavel Grudinin can not be called luck. Especially at a time when the second perestroika has clearly knocked at the door of the Russian Federation. It does not matter that V. Putin looks like Brezhnev, who did not die in November 1982, but survived until 1985. The fact of a fracture of the trend is evident. Even the very fact of the nomination of Pavel Grudinin is a sign of a new restructuring. The fifth term of Putin will be marked by crushing-tectonic shifts.
***
A common voter, stunned by the drumbeat of propaganda, still does not notice what we, kogi-cognitarians see.
The first sign: a hasty exit from Syria under the pretext of a "great victory", shouting for victory over the "blacks" and preserving the territorial integrity of Syria. Although the war continues, there is no territorial integrity and in the meantime, the banned EU, IGIL has become like a ball of mercury, in which they hit a hammer. The ball crashed into the darkness of small droplets of spools, which again gather. Now - and in Afghanistan with the prospect of entering Turkestan, and in Russia itself.
It can be seen that all this propagandist nonsense with the "struggle at distant approaches" was dispelled without a trace. And there arises the prospect of multi-trillion-dollar costs for restoring infrastructure in Syria, which for the choking economy of the Russian Federation is like a bar for the infarction.
Analogies with the departure from Afghanistan - there is nowhere more transparent.
The second sign: the military budget for 2018 is decreasing. So far, without specific figures, Putin himself stated about it. That is, it is already recognized that the hybrid economy of the Russian Federation (the marasmus of monetarist-neo-liberals pole of false-imperial mega-costs) has undermined and now it is necessary, like under Gorby, to cut defense appropriations.
The third sign: it is already clear that in 2018 Putin will have to say goodbye to the image of the "good king" and take steps that are extremely painful for the masses. On increasing taxes, shifting these from enterprises to citizens, to raising the retirement age and so on.
The fourth sign: just as the Soviet ruling elite was tired of confrontation with the West by 1985, today's Russian Federation is just as tired and irritated with the confrontation with the United States and the EU. Unlike in 1985, he still faced the prospect of confiscating his wealth in the West. This factor in the Soviet party-state elite simply did not exist: it did not have foreign kubishkas with assets.
Symptom five: the society is tired of the current quasi-imperial policy, it does not think about Syria or about Ukraine, but about its empty pockets. On the impossibility of a normal life in the country. By 1985, the Soviet man in the street also heard with nauseous feelings about "international duty", the need to conduct an arms race with NATO, that the USSR was helping Angola (Vietnam, Cuba, Ethiopia, etc.) so much. The Commoner was simply tired of standing in lines literally for everything. He wanted to live humanely. By 1985, in the USSR (and I was a witness to that), voices were sounding louder than ever that it was enough to help half the world and fight in Afghanistan in an incomprehensible war, that it would be better to build roads, provide meat, sausage and cheese in shops, Yes, wages would be raised. Yes, housing would be provided.
The same thing, in the opinion of Maxim Kalashnikov, has come and now. The very appearance (with the blessing of the presidential administration!) Of a candidate like Pavel Grudinin, speaks about it.
What is Grudinin talking about? About the fact that you need to abandon the ruinous "imperial ambitions" (by which he understands the current Kremlin splash of resources into dubious foreign countries) and focus on the development of the RF itself. On solving her internal problems. On the rise of the well-being of citizens, the fight against poverty and poverty, on the rise of production and construction of roads, in the fight against corruption and the creation of a genuine fair, independent court. In part, he is echoed by such a proven puppet of power as Zhirinovsky. He also states that Russia's foreign policy does not lead to the prosperity of the country, but to its ruin. Grudinin started talking about the "thin world" with Ukraine, read - the world at any cost.
And in Grudinin - a surge in popularity. Yes, a very vivid indicator that Russia is on the verge of perestroika-2. That within the Fifth term there will be a transfer of power to the successor. The Kremlin simply has no way out of the impasse.
***
Please note: despite the vigorous "nicht capituliren" of semi-official propaganda, as the "wealth" of the Rasei "elite" in the West approaches (and the prospects for their confiscation are approaching), the Kremlin is frantically backing away. Then he agrees to humiliation at the Winter Olympics in South Korea, then in response to deliveries of American military weapons, Kiev Peskov declares that Moscow will not supply arms to the People's Republic of China and the People's Republic of China.
The closer the moment of truth, the more there will be similar evidence that the top of the Russian Federation - like Gorby in 1986 - is ready to agree amicably. The unchanging factor: the maniacal desire of Putin's team to keep the system and pro-Western liberal monetarists at the helm of the economy and the Central Bank. Which, incidentally, and provided Putin with economic defeat in the Cold War-2. Do you know what the present moment still looks like in 1985? The fact that the economy of the country and its transformation are headed by people who are openly impregnated with "Westernism" and the desire to end the cold war at the cost of overdrawing to the West.
That in 1985, that in 2017 ... Dejavu full!
***
In such conditions - convinced! - You can not tolerate the disruption of the coalition of red patriots and Russian great-power nationalists. After all, the Russian Federation will very quickly roll to the second 1991.
To lose the great-power nationalists in the person of Igor Strelkov is archiplopo. What made them mad? The oath of allegiance is impossible in principle to the Minsk Agreements. And underlining that Grudinin is a candidate exclusively from the Communist Party, and not from a coalition of patriotic forces, who rejected disputes over the past in the name of saving the country and for the sake of the Future.
They (like Maxim Kalashnikov) believe that the development of the Russian productive economy, the struggle against backwardness, the purification of the Russian Federation from the power of looters, and the reunification of the Russian lands should be a priority nowadays. What for them are not only the Crimea, but the rest of Novorossia. But in Syria, we really have nothing to do.
The fact that APG puts Syria and Novorossia on the same board, from my personal point of view, is a huge mistake. It is necessary not to hesitate and immediately establish ties with the imperial nationalists, great-powers, for whom Strelkov is an undisputed leader and an unquestioned authority.
Otherwise, it is not only a foolish split in the patriotic coalition, but also an increasing "sticking together" of APG with white tape. With pro-Western liberals
I would not like to....
https://m-kalashnikov.livejournal.com/3 ... ium=social
google translator
Here again we see what appears fair prognostication tainted by anti-communism. Bygones cannot be bygones and I'm not getting warm fuzzies about Grudinin. Looks like CPUSA ain't the only party that needs a sound purging.
Igor Strelkov announced a complete refusal to cooperate with Boldyrev and Grudinin
-
In fact, there is nothing to comment on: not one of my claims to his actions, nor to the words of Grudinin - Boldyrev did not answer "from the word in general."
https://vk.com/igoristrelkov?w=wall347260249_229865
HERE YOU AND THE RESERVATION IN THE DOOR STARTS The
discord in the emerging coalition of red and white patriots is now becoming completely ruinous.
I am writing these lines not as a party functionary, but as a private person. As an observer.
Yes, the loss of Igor Strelkov Pavel Grudinin can not be called luck. Especially at a time when the second perestroika has clearly knocked at the door of the Russian Federation. It does not matter that V. Putin looks like Brezhnev, who did not die in November 1982, but survived until 1985. The fact of a fracture of the trend is evident. Even the very fact of the nomination of Pavel Grudinin is a sign of a new restructuring. The fifth term of Putin will be marked by crushing-tectonic shifts.
***
A common voter, stunned by the drumbeat of propaganda, still does not notice what we, kogi-cognitarians see.
The first sign: a hasty exit from Syria under the pretext of a "great victory", shouting for victory over the "blacks" and preserving the territorial integrity of Syria. Although the war continues, there is no territorial integrity and in the meantime, the banned EU, IGIL has become like a ball of mercury, in which they hit a hammer. The ball crashed into the darkness of small droplets of spools, which again gather. Now - and in Afghanistan with the prospect of entering Turkestan, and in Russia itself.
It can be seen that all this propagandist nonsense with the "struggle at distant approaches" was dispelled without a trace. And there arises the prospect of multi-trillion-dollar costs for restoring infrastructure in Syria, which for the choking economy of the Russian Federation is like a bar for the infarction.
Analogies with the departure from Afghanistan - there is nowhere more transparent.
The second sign: the military budget for 2018 is decreasing. So far, without specific figures, Putin himself stated about it. That is, it is already recognized that the hybrid economy of the Russian Federation (the marasmus of monetarist-neo-liberals pole of false-imperial mega-costs) has undermined and now it is necessary, like under Gorby, to cut defense appropriations.
The third sign: it is already clear that in 2018 Putin will have to say goodbye to the image of the "good king" and take steps that are extremely painful for the masses. On increasing taxes, shifting these from enterprises to citizens, to raising the retirement age and so on.
The fourth sign: just as the Soviet ruling elite was tired of confrontation with the West by 1985, today's Russian Federation is just as tired and irritated with the confrontation with the United States and the EU. Unlike in 1985, he still faced the prospect of confiscating his wealth in the West. This factor in the Soviet party-state elite simply did not exist: it did not have foreign kubishkas with assets.
Symptom five: the society is tired of the current quasi-imperial policy, it does not think about Syria or about Ukraine, but about its empty pockets. On the impossibility of a normal life in the country. By 1985, the Soviet man in the street also heard with nauseous feelings about "international duty", the need to conduct an arms race with NATO, that the USSR was helping Angola (Vietnam, Cuba, Ethiopia, etc.) so much. The Commoner was simply tired of standing in lines literally for everything. He wanted to live humanely. By 1985, in the USSR (and I was a witness to that), voices were sounding louder than ever that it was enough to help half the world and fight in Afghanistan in an incomprehensible war, that it would be better to build roads, provide meat, sausage and cheese in shops, Yes, wages would be raised. Yes, housing would be provided.
The same thing, in the opinion of Maxim Kalashnikov, has come and now. The very appearance (with the blessing of the presidential administration!) Of a candidate like Pavel Grudinin, speaks about it.
What is Grudinin talking about? About the fact that you need to abandon the ruinous "imperial ambitions" (by which he understands the current Kremlin splash of resources into dubious foreign countries) and focus on the development of the RF itself. On solving her internal problems. On the rise of the well-being of citizens, the fight against poverty and poverty, on the rise of production and construction of roads, in the fight against corruption and the creation of a genuine fair, independent court. In part, he is echoed by such a proven puppet of power as Zhirinovsky. He also states that Russia's foreign policy does not lead to the prosperity of the country, but to its ruin. Grudinin started talking about the "thin world" with Ukraine, read - the world at any cost.
And in Grudinin - a surge in popularity. Yes, a very vivid indicator that Russia is on the verge of perestroika-2. That within the Fifth term there will be a transfer of power to the successor. The Kremlin simply has no way out of the impasse.
***
Please note: despite the vigorous "nicht capituliren" of semi-official propaganda, as the "wealth" of the Rasei "elite" in the West approaches (and the prospects for their confiscation are approaching), the Kremlin is frantically backing away. Then he agrees to humiliation at the Winter Olympics in South Korea, then in response to deliveries of American military weapons, Kiev Peskov declares that Moscow will not supply arms to the People's Republic of China and the People's Republic of China.
The closer the moment of truth, the more there will be similar evidence that the top of the Russian Federation - like Gorby in 1986 - is ready to agree amicably. The unchanging factor: the maniacal desire of Putin's team to keep the system and pro-Western liberal monetarists at the helm of the economy and the Central Bank. Which, incidentally, and provided Putin with economic defeat in the Cold War-2. Do you know what the present moment still looks like in 1985? The fact that the economy of the country and its transformation are headed by people who are openly impregnated with "Westernism" and the desire to end the cold war at the cost of overdrawing to the West.
That in 1985, that in 2017 ... Dejavu full!
***
In such conditions - convinced! - You can not tolerate the disruption of the coalition of red patriots and Russian great-power nationalists. After all, the Russian Federation will very quickly roll to the second 1991.
To lose the great-power nationalists in the person of Igor Strelkov is archiplopo. What made them mad? The oath of allegiance is impossible in principle to the Minsk Agreements. And underlining that Grudinin is a candidate exclusively from the Communist Party, and not from a coalition of patriotic forces, who rejected disputes over the past in the name of saving the country and for the sake of the Future.
They (like Maxim Kalashnikov) believe that the development of the Russian productive economy, the struggle against backwardness, the purification of the Russian Federation from the power of looters, and the reunification of the Russian lands should be a priority nowadays. What for them are not only the Crimea, but the rest of Novorossia. But in Syria, we really have nothing to do.
The fact that APG puts Syria and Novorossia on the same board, from my personal point of view, is a huge mistake. It is necessary not to hesitate and immediately establish ties with the imperial nationalists, great-powers, for whom Strelkov is an undisputed leader and an unquestioned authority.
Otherwise, it is not only a foolish split in the patriotic coalition, but also an increasing "sticking together" of APG with white tape. With pro-Western liberals
I would not like to....
https://m-kalashnikov.livejournal.com/3 ... ium=social
google translator
Here again we see what appears fair prognostication tainted by anti-communism. Bygones cannot be bygones and I'm not getting warm fuzzies about Grudinin. Looks like CPUSA ain't the only party that needs a sound purging.