Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Wed Feb 05, 2025 12:44 pm

A colonial relationship
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 05/02/2025

Image

Equally expected and disappointing, Zelensky's Victory Plan was unveiled in October last year as a roadmap to achieve the longed-for victory. Despite the declared intentions and the title, the plan was nothing more than a list of the conditions that Ukraine hoped to obtain from its allies. Months earlier, the Ukrainian president had presented the Peace Formula , which demands unilateral Russian withdrawal and the payment of war reparations, a document that outlines the concessions that Kiev expects from its enemy, a document that simply details the conditions under which Russia must surrender to Ukraine. Neither of the two proposals is an action plan in pursuit of the objectives, but both are composed of what the Zelensky government hopes to obtain from its enemies and allies. The plan's lack of creativity and, above all, its lack of viability as a tool to achieve the objective of defeating the common opponent in this proxy war, caused it to fall into oblivion rather quickly.

However, some unexpected details of the plan, designed primarily to make the country – and the war – attractive to the United States and Donald Trump, did attract attention. “The fourth point is strategic economic potential. Ukraine offers its strategic partners a special agreement for joint protection of the country’s critical resources, as well as joint investment and use of this economic potential,” wrote the official Ukrainian government website at the time, which, in case there was any doubt, specified that “these are critical natural resources and metals worth trillions of US dollars, such as uranium, titanium, lithium, graphite and other resources of strategic value, which represent a significant advantage in global competition.” In June of that year, US Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Ukraine’s main friends in the US legislature, had made headlines and received significant media coverage with statements in which he claimed that “war is about money.” In an appearance on Fox News , the favorite channel of then-Republican candidate Donald Trump, the senator tried to get the future president’s attention by insisting that “Ukraine sits on a trillion dollars of minerals that could be good for our economy.” The senator even filmed a video recorded with a mobile phone in which he repeated this proposition to an uncomfortably smiling Zelensky, who nodded without really knowing what his ally was saying .

Three months earlier, during his previous visit to kyiv, Graham had been tasked with convincing Zelensky that Ukraine's only option was to accept that military assistance would come, not in the form of a non-repayable grant, but in the form of a loan. The change in policy had a clear objective: to obtain facilities for approving new funds in Congress using the financial trick of camouflaging an expense - Ukraine will never be able to pay its allies for military assistance if it is not in the form of plunder - as a loan whose value will be recovered in the future. With the growing certainty that Joe Biden was not going to be the next president, or even the candidate, it became clear that, whoever won the elections, Ukraine would find itself with a presidency less sympathetic to its cause, so credit assistance was consolidated as an adequate means of financing. In war, nothing is free and the priority of the allies is to fulfill their own interests. No one admits this reality more explicitly than Donald Trump, to whom the fourth point of Zelensky’s Victory Plan was addressed , which was openly presented as a way of sharing the exploitation of Ukraine’s important natural resources as a form of payment for the support received. The difficulties of the war, the absence of a truly free and critical press in Ukraine, the servility shown by the Western press, still reluctant to criticise Zelensky, and the low prospects of the plan being implemented meant that there was no particular reaction to the proposal to make the country’s natural resources available to the allies, a way of offering the country to a colonial relationship with the West.

Since Donald Trump's victory, both after his inauguration and in the weeks leading up to his inauguration, several articles have presented, generally without mentioning Zelensky's plan, the idea of ​​using Ukraine's natural resources as an argument for continuing the war and also as a guarantee. Marc Thiessen's articles are an example of this. In the first, the veteran conservative think-tanker and columnist for The Washington Post highlighted the significant wealth found in Ukraine's soil or subsoil and warned Donald Trump that, if they did not remain in American hands, they would fall into the hands of Russia or, even worse, China. There was no interest in using these resources to benefit the country in which they are located, but rather that they should be used as a tool in the geopolitical and strategic struggle against habitual enemies. In the second, Thiessen argued quite explicitly that “it is time to move Ukraine from being a recipient of aid to a consumer of defense,” arguing that assistance to kyiv should continue, but not at the expense of the American population but on credit, either with guarantees of the final expropriation of Russian assets seized in Europe or of Ukraine’s natural resources. “kyiv can pay,” argues the article, which specifically refers to the country’s minerals and rare earths as a form of payment, provided, of course, that Ukraine manages to survive the war, for which the United States would have to continue supplying weapons.

On Monday night, in one of his many media appearances these days, Donald Trump adopted the idea with his usual naturalness, although he did not refer only to the future but also to the past. “President Donald Trump says he wants access to Ukraine’s bonanza of rare earths and critical minerals in exchange for the billions of dollars in military aid that Washington has been supplying to Kiev,” wrote NBC , which assumed that in this way, in exchange for payment, the United States will continue to finance the Ukrainian military effort. No one seems to ask if there is not a contradiction between this position and the statement of the previous day, when Trump claimed progress in the search for peace. “We are telling Ukraine that they have very valuable rare earths,” Trump said, adding that “we are looking to make a deal with Ukraine in which they will secure what we are giving them with their rare earths and other things.” Without needing to mention the Victory Plan , the American president insisted that “they are willing to do it.” According to the Financial Times , Ukraine has already offered the US “special conditions” for access to its key natural resources. It is significant that Ukraine has expressed displeasure at Trump and Kellogg’s alleged proposal to hold elections, but not at the demand to hand over part of the country’s natural resources, a way of surrendering state sovereignty.

Any condition is acceptable if the alternative option is to have to negotiate the end of the war, so even leaving a part of the country's wealth in the hands of the United States is an obligation for Ukraine, which, due to its foreign dependence, has lost all ability to negotiate with its allies. If the objective of the United States, as Donald Trump has stated, is to "match" the "300 billion that we have given them" - a figure much higher than the real one - the plunder will not be less, hence it has already caused the anger of the allies who send aid at a loss.

“It would be very selfish and egotistical” to use a country’s natural resources as payment for military assistance, criticised Olaf Scholz yesterday, the leader of one of the countries from which Washington is asking for the greatest economic effort to sustain the militarisation of the continent. In these almost three years of common mobilisation of resources for the war, it has been insisted that “assistance to Ukraine is not charity”, arguing that it was an investment in common security. This European vision contrasts with the view of the oligarch, who sees military supplies as a service provided to be compensated by means of payment. There are only a few countries for which Washington is willing to invest its own funds without demanding anything in return. Ukraine, despite trying to present itself as the essential partner without which the free world and Western civilisation would collapse like a house of cards, is not one of them. That is why it is already looking for a way to comply with Trump’s wishes. If the continuation of military supplies and the war depend on it, the White House will get exactly what it asks for.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/05/31496/

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
Summary of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of 5 February 2025 ) Main points:

- The Russian Armed Forces hit training sites for drone operators and electronic warfare specialists of the Ukrainian Armed Forces;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 500 soldiers in the area of ​​the Center group of forces in one day;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 120 soldiers due to the actions of the East group of forces;

- The Russian Air Defense Forces shot down 10 HIMARS shells and 57 Ukrainian drones in one day;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 220 soldiers in one day in the area of ​​the West group of forces;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 90 soldiers as a result of the actions of the North and Dnepr groups;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 200 soldiers in the area of ​​responsibility of the South.

▫️Units of the "East" group of forces continued active offensive actions. They defeated formations of the tank , mechanized brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the marine brigade and two territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Bogatyr, Razliv, Razdolnoye, Burlatskoye of the Donetsk People's Republic and Gulyaipole of the Zaporizhia region. The Armed Forces of Ukraine lost up to 120 servicemen, an armored combat vehicle, three cars, four field artillery guns, including two 155-mm howitzers M777 and M198 made in the USA.



▫️Units of the Dnepr group of forces defeated the manpower and equipment of a mechanized brigade , three coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a National Guard brigade in the areas of the settlements of Orekhov, Malye Shcherbaky, Kamenskoye in the Zaporizhia region, Tokarevka and Prydniprovskoye in the Kherson region. The enemy lost up to 60 servicemen, a tank, two infantry fighting vehicles, five cars and an artillery piece.



▫️ Operational-tactical aviation , strike unmanned aerial vehicles , missile forces and artillery of the Russian Armed Forces groups damaged the infrastructure of military airfields, storage sites and preparation sites for launching unmanned aerial vehicles, training sites for drone operators and electronic warfare specialists, as well as concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment in 157 areas.

▫️ Air defense systems shot down 10 US-made HIMARS multiple launch rockets and 57 aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️ In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following have been destroyed: 653 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 42,463 unmanned aerial vehicles, 590 anti-aircraft missile systems, 21,034 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,513 multiple launch rocket systems, 21,276 field artillery pieces and mortars, and 31,218 units of special military vehicles.

***

Colonelcassad
Night strikes on military infrastructure facilities of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

On the night of February 5, 2025, Russian troops carried out a series of strikes on the deployment locations of Ukrainian Armed Forces units, ammunition depots, logistics hubs and military equipment . Destroyed ammunition, damaged artillery equipment, armored vehicles and enemy personnel have been confirmed .

Stetskivka, Sumy region (22:00, 04.02.2025)
Two Iskander-M missiles hit the concentration area of ​​the 4th separate artillery division of the 44th artillery brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces , which was carrying out tasks to provide fire support in the Kursk direction .

Results of the strike:
- The ammunition depot, where the following were stored, was completely destroyed : • 155-mm shells for M777 , FH70 , PzH 2000 howitzers ; • M30A1 GMLRS rockets for HIMARS; • 152 mm ammunition for the 2S3 Akatsiya and 2S19 Msta-S self-propelled guns . - One M109A6 Paladin self-propelled gun was disabled - the chassis was damaged, the rupture of the ammunition led to a detonation. - One M270 MLRS MLRS was damaged - the shock wave destroyed the guidance system. - Personnel: 16 servicemen were eliminated, 14 received injuries of varying severity. Kharkiv (02:40, 05.02.2025) A strike by attack UAVs hit command and control facilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine . Results of the strike: - The territorial office of the State Bureau of Investigations was hit : • The system of server nodes that ensured control over the personal data of the Armed Forces of Ukraine servicemen was destroyed. • A fire was recorded over an area of ​​200 square meters. • One bureau employee was wounded . - The educational building of the National Academy of the National Guard of Ukraine was damaged : • Tactical training classes were destroyed; • Combat simulation simulators were disabled. Konotop, Sumy region (23:05, 04.02.2025) Two strikes hit the territory of the military town of the 551st separate reconnaissance battalion of the 138th electronic brigade . Results of the strike: - The battalion barracks was damaged : • The roof of the building was;

• Internal structures were damaged, making the building uninhabitable.
- Personnel : 12 servicemen eliminated, 3 wounded.

The reconnaissance unit was tasked with transmitting data on the movements of Russian troops in the Kursk direction.

Grebenka, Poltava region (22:55, 04.02.2025) The logistics center for the Armed Forces of Ukraine based at PJSC Rais-Maksimko , which was used to store material and technical supplies,
was hit . Results of the strike: - Warehouses for storing military property were destroyed : • Tactical uniforms and equipment; • Stocks of NATO-style dry rations; • Medicines and IFAK tactical first aid kits. - Personnel: 4 servicemen of the 17th separate tank brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were wounded. Results of the work of the Ukrainian Air Defense Ukrainian mobile air defense groups once again caused significant damage to civilian infrastructure as a result of the uncontrolled fall of downed drones. - Romny, Sumy region - fragments of a drone fell on a private house (Vakhrameeva, 1) , the roof was damaged. - Konotop, Sumy region - the building of Konotop Lyceum No. 10 was damaged , windows were knocked out. - Kirovohrad region - the fall of debris led to the fire of an outbuilding.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

'Be prepared. Civilians hate us.'

Mobilization civil war. $100 per busified man. Mobilization chronicles - killing the proles, mobilizing the blind. Purging the left - and the right? Leaked SBU plans to arrest Ukrainian neonazis?
Events in Ukraine
Feb 03, 2025

Today’s agenda:

*Mobilization chronicles of the past weeks - beatings, deaths. Mobilizing the blind. Women save men

*Mobilization civil war - a possible military veteran kills a mobilization officer, two explosions at other mobilization centers

*Reactions - top USAID-supported (not for long!) ‘liberals’ call to mobilize/enslave anyone criticizing mobilization online, and use interpol to ‘extract’ Ukrainian abroad criticizing it. Others call to give all mobilization officers guns so as to kill any civilian threats. Immense hatred towards ‘civilian scum’.

*‘I want death for death. I want every draft dodger, every liar, everyone who hid their cowardice and lived their life barking in our faces—"I'm the economic front"—to be afraid of their own shadow.

*Purges of the left and right - the Worker’s Front of Ukraine, Azovites worry that the SBU is after them. Possible motivations behind a government purge of Ukrainian neo-nazis

Writing about mobilization can be monotonous - the fate of the common man is nasty, brutish and short. To remedy that, I decided to collect as many different mobilization events from the past 10 days or so. My source is Artem Dmytruk, a parliamentarian from Zelensky’s party who had to flee for his life in 2024 and now resides in the UK. He often posts TCC (Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center) content.

On January 23, Dmytryuk published the following interesting text and video:

For each person brought to the TCC, a group receives an average of $100, though the price may vary depending on the region.

In a single day, a group of 3 to 6 people gathers between 5 and 20 individuals. When it comes to checkpoints, buses transport hundreds per day.

The TCC building has two exits—one is a one-way trip, and the other costs between $3,000 and $10,000 to go home, but only until the next time.



January 26, mobilization officers try to capture a man while taking the bus: (Video at link.)

January 28, Kyiv region: (Video at link.)

On January 29, Dmytruk published the following videos and caption: (Video at link.)

THE SCARIEST PART IS THAT THIS IS NORMAL!

In Odessa, a half-blind young man was taken by the TCC while walking his dog and was immediately sent to training.

A woman reported that her son has extremely poor eyesight, is being monitored at the Filatov Clinic, and is almost blind in one eye. According to her, he was taken while walking his dog, brought to the Suvorov TCC, and then transferred to the regional center.

The mother went to the TCC, where she was told she needed to pay $8,000 to get her son released. Later, she found out that he had already been mobilized and sent as an assault trooper to the 91st Brigade, to a training camp near Zhytomyr.

She also claims that along with her son, people with active tuberculosis, young men aged 22 and 24, and a cook from a café were sent there.

So, is this woman also a Kremlin agent?!


January 30, Odessa - the TCC tried to capture a father and truck-driver, but were stopped by a crowd of civilians: (Video at link.)


Odessa, January 30: policemen do their best to earn their $100: (Video at link.)

February 3, Dnipro: a man was saved from mobilization: (Video at link.)

February 3, unknown city: a man resists mobilization officers: (Video at link.)

By the way, Dmytruk isn’t likely to be making things up when it comes to $100 per captured man. The whole process has long been run as a conveyer belt. A TCC official anonymously stated the following in commentary to the Ukrainian media resource TSN on December 23:

"Previously, it was necessary to have one summons or one draft dodger per day, or even better, both. In general, the planned number depends on the total number that is sent down the chain from top to bottom — the number of people that need to be mobilized,"

He also claimed that those TCC employees who do not meet the plan are themselves sent to the front.

Once ‘busified’ by the TCC, the victim can also be released - for a price:

"These are all rumors, but these rumors are regular — like how a TCC guy can earn some extra cash. A person gets into the minibus and knows that they will go through the military medical commission, and in the evening, they could be already at the training ground. Or they don’t know, but we do. So, they can be released. Not for free," the military man admitted.

Mobilization civil war
On February 1, what should be predictable happened. This is the official Ukrainian military statement on it:

On February 1, 2025, at a gas station in the city of Pyriatyn, a shocking incident occurred during the escorting of conscripts to the 199th Training Center – an armed attack on a serviceman of the Poltava District Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center (TCC).

An unidentified man wearing a gray balaclava and pixelated trousers [Ukrainian military camo] approached the serviceman of the Poltava TCC, threatened him with a hunting rifle, and demanded that he hand over his weapon. After being refused, the assailant shot the serviceman. As a result of the severe injury, the soldier died on the spot.

Following the attack, the perpetrator seized the serviceman’s assault rifle and fled along with one of the mobilized conscripts.


Photos showing the arrest of the alleged perpetrator were published soon after by the police. He was apparently a resident of the Poltava region, born in 1984. Poltava, by the way, is about as ‘truly Ukrainian’ as it gets, culturally speaking. He was also arrested along with the man he saved, who was born in 1988. According to strana, he was captured at an Okko gas station in the very same town of Pyriatyn.

Image

Then on February 2, there was an explosion at the Rivne regional TCC. According to police, one person died and 6 were injured. At first, local media claimed several people had been killed.

Image

Image
When western-funded Ukrainska Pravda published news about the Rivne explosion, the comments were filled with hatred at the TCC. ‘Send the TCC to the front’. ‘This is the result of busification’ ‘This is to be expected’ ‘The TCC faggots have gotten a boomerang’

And on February 3, the Dnipropetrovsk regional TCC published the following statement about yet another attack:

This evening, an explosion of an unidentified object occurred near the building of the Pavlohrad Territorial Recruitment and Social Support Center (TCC). According to preliminary information, one man was injured as a result of the incident. His condition is reported to be mild.

In an even more interesting turn of events, some on Ukrainian twitter started sharing information on February 2 that the shooter was himself a frontline veteran. Recall that he was wearing Ukrainian camo during the attack.

Context
I sometimes find it hard to cover mobilization stories, since they are so constant. Here are some recent deaths in TCC centres. Rivne and Poltava figure in several of them, but they hardly stand out.

June 2024: “Man dies after TCC in Zhytomyr region: relatives say it was a murder, military registration and enlistment office says it was alcohol and epilepsy” (TSN)

Смерть чоловіка після ТЦК на Житомирщині: рідні кажуть про вбивство, військкомат – про алкоголь та епілепсію
October 2024: “A man's body with signs of suicide was found at the Poltava Regional TCC.” (Glavcom)

Image
December 2024: “In Volyn, TCC representatives beat a man and took him directly from the hospital” (UNIAN)

Image
January 2025: “In Sumy, a man died after being beaten at the TCC.” (BBC)

Image

Or this video from November 2024, where a woman in Kostopil, Rivne region, cursed TCC officers for stealing a man she was probably married or related to:

You are scum, animals, I wish a bullet would kill you (Video at link.)

https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/p/ ... ns-hate-us

******

Trump’s Interest In Ukraine’s Rare Earth Minerals Might Backfire On Zelensky
Andrew Korybko
Feb 04, 2025

Image

Instead of abandoning his efforts to freeze the Ukrainian Conflict by doubling down on military aid in the hopes that Zelensky’s forces will then recapture these deposits from Russia, Trump might instead try to cut a deal with Putin for Russia to sell some of these extracted resources to the US.

Trump’s confirmed interest in Ukraine’s rare earth minerals is being interpreted by some as beneficial for Zelensky amidst uncertainty about his commitment to Ukraine. One of the points from Zelensky’s so-called “Victory Plan” calls for letting his country’s allies extract its critical minerals. New Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently warned about the strategic advantage that China derives from its control over the rare earth mineral supply chain so he might have influenced Trump’s views on this issue.

US Senator Lindsey Graham raised awareness of Ukraine’s critical mineral riches during his trip there last June after he claimed that they’re sitting on $10-12 trillion worth of such wealth. Trump 2.0’s foreign policy focus on more muscularly containing China in all ways predictably predisposed him to appreciate the abovementioned point from Zelensky’s “Victory Plan”. The problem though is that the bulk of Ukraine’s critical mineral wealth is under Russian control and Ukrainian forces continue retreating.

At the same time, Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellogg’s words about how Ukraine needs to hold its long-delayed elections were seen as Trump’s interest in brokering a ceasefire, after which martial law can be lifted, the elections can be held, and the new government can then begin peace talks. This expectation contrasts with what Trump said a few days later about his interest in Ukraine’s (largely Russian-controlled) rare earth mineral deposits and the attendant possibility for proxy escalation.

Instead of abandoning his efforts to freeze the Ukrainian Conflict by doubling down on military aid in the hopes that Zelensky’s forces will then recapture these deposits from Russia, which could perpetuate the proxy war and thus derail his foreign policy agenda, Trump might instead try to cut a deal with Putin. One of the conditions that Trump could make for coercing Ukraine into withdrawing from at least some of the territory that Russia claims as its own might be for Putin to sell the US some of these minerals.

Putin might agree to this depending on how far Trump is able to coerce Ukraine into withdrawing, plus there’s a pragmatic argument in favor of this arrangement in that it could form a trust-building measure for the US one day allowing the EU to partially resume some Russia gas pipeline imports. The purpose would be to restore a degree of Russia and the EU’s pre-conflict complex economic interdependence, albeit this time under US supervision, as a reward for Russia complying with a ceasefire.

Russia requires capital and technology to fully exploit the rare earth deposits that are now under its control, both of which could be provided by the US, with the first possibly involving the return of some seized Russian assets so long as they’re invested into this endeavor. If successfully implemented, then this proposal could lead to more creative diplomacy of the sort suggested at the end of this analysis here for depriving China of Russia’s enormous resource wealth, which aligns with Trump’s foreign policy goals.

Ukraine wouldn’t be left completely in the lurch, however, since other smaller rare earth mineral deposits still remain under its control. These could be given to the US in exchange for continued military aid, even if the latter is curtailed when compared to its height under the Biden Administration in the run-up to summer 2023’s ultimately doomed counteroffensive. If Trump already reaches an agreement with Putin on the Russian-controlled deposits, then Zelensky would have little choice but to agree to this deal.

Far from the full military support that he expected to receive in pursuit of recapturing those lost deposits, he’d only end up with whatever the cost-conscious Trump Administration determines is the absolute minimum that the US considers that Ukraine requires for keeping the peace. This is the best outcome for those on all sides who truly want peace, but it requires substantial will on both the US and Russia’s parts along with the US coercing Ukraine into agreeing, none of which can be guaranteed.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/trumps-i ... aines-rare

Andy's working on another way to short Russia...Russia don't own us nuttin...

*******

Russian SVR's Latest Intel: "West Preparing to Flush Zelensky"
Simplicius
Feb 03, 2025

Some interesting developments have produced hints as to how Ukraine’s end game may shape up. Zelensky is being increasingly viewed as a problem by the Trump-Kellogg team, because of his mulishness and refusal to budge on any of the core concessions viewed as necessary to ending the war. Now, apparently a concensus around this same conclusion is forming in Europe as well.

As evidence of this, we have an official release from Russia’s foreign intelligence service of the SVR, which outlines a plan by NATO members to discredit Zelensky as the kickoff to a campaign to eventually flush him in order to install someone more amenable to unconditional peace talks.

This is from the official SVR Russian government site:

Image
http://www.svr.gov.ru/smi/2025/02/natov ... nskogo.htm

The press office release in full:

03.02.2025

The press office of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation reports that, according to information received by the SVR, NATO headquarters are increasingly thinking about a change of power in Ukraine. Brussels believes that the Ukrainian Armed Forces will soon be unable to contain the growing onslaught of the Russian army. With the coming to power in the United States, D. Trump's decision increases uncertainty about the continuation of military assistance that the West will be able to provide to Kiev.

The NATO leadership considers it necessary at all costs to preserve the remnants of Ukraine as an anti-Russian springboard. It is supposed to "freeze" the conflict by bringing the warring parties to a dialogue about the "beginning of its settlement". At the same time, Washington and Brussels agree that the main obstacle to the implementation of such a scenario is V. Zelensky, who is called "spent material"on the Western sidelines. NATO would like to get rid of the head of the Kiev regime, ideally as a result of pseudo-democratic elections. According to the alliance's calculations, they could take place in Ukraine no later than the fall of this year.

On the eve of the election campaign, NATO headquarters are preparing a large-scale operation to discredit Zelensky. It is planned, in particular, to make public information about the appropriation personally by the "president" and members of his team only from funds intended for the purchase of ammunition, more than $ 1.5 billion. In addition, it is planned to reveal the scheme for the withdrawal of Zelensky and his entourage abroad of the monetary allowance of 130 thousand dead Ukrainian servicemen who continue to be listed as alive and serving on the front line. It is also planned to make public the facts of the involvement of the "supreme Commander-in-Chief of Ukraine" in repeated cases of the sale of large quantities of Western military equipment transferred to Kiev free of charge to various groups in African countries.

Thus, the fact that the time of the "overdue" Zelensky is numbered is understood even in NATO. It is only a pity that this understanding was given at the cost of the lives of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian citizens.

Press Office

SVR of Russia 03.02.2025


So, the above states that Ukrainian elections must be held no later than this coming Fall because the AFU situation is that precarious that Zelensky needs to be ousted this year in order to prevent a total Russian take over of Ukraine. We saw in my last piece that beacons of Western thought are now naming 2026 as the year that Russian tanks will roll through both Kiev and Lvov, with Budanov intimating that after this coming summer, Ukraine will begin facing ‘existential’ potentialities.

This is in line with earlier theories from months ago that Trump would initiate an “audit” of Ukraine, which would conveniently find vast corruption to the point of allowing Trump to ‘wash his hands’ of Zelensky and Ukraine at large, dumping them on Europe.

Take with a grain of salt, but Legitimny reports:

#hearings
Our source reports that the Trump team has already begun an audit of the Ukrainian case. Corruption schemes for billions of dollars, where all the highest ranks up to Ermak and his puppets are involved.
Information about this has not yet been disclosed. If Zelensky continues to drag out the war, then in the spring of 2025 the world can see a lot of interesting materials and facts.


Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine-Russia Keith Kellogg is now slated to arrive in Kiev on February 11th for a one-on-one with Zelensky, perhaps to personally convey the above messaging as a final ultimatum to the doomed leader.

According to the Ukrainian publication, citing its own sources, Kellogg is expected to arrive in Ukraine after February 11 to meet with Volodymyr Zelensky.

After his visit to Ukraine, Kellogg will travel to Europe for talks and then attend the Munich Security Conference.


European leaders however are still attempting to cling on, again announcing some special upcoming meetings to build solidarity around Ukrainian support in light of Trump’s signaled disengaged hostility.

Image
https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-defe ... nio-costa/

Some of that was expressed in a new leaked call between famed Russian pranksters ‘Vovan & Lexus’ and German Bundestag CDU member Johann
Wadephul. In the call, European Council on Foreign Relations member Wadephul calls Russia a perpetual ‘enemy’, and says the AfD is politically ‘under control’ by the other power factions and will “never have a role in state or federal politics”, according to the European deep state agent.

Either way, it’s now clear that some of the old predicted vectors are potentially coming to fruition, with the powers-that-be needing to sweep Zelensky aside to keep Russia from taking control of their vast investment instrument of Ukraine.

The problem is, of course, that they continue to believe their own fraudulent propaganda as to Russia’s ‘vulnerability’. You see, their own false intelligence, once designed to sustain the war, is now working against them. The deep state-run intel agencies once sought to continue the war at all costs to bleed Russia, and did this by vastly over-exaggerating Russian losses while downplaying Ukrainian ones. This served its purpose for a time when it was still up in the air whether Russia could actually be defeated or not.

But now that it’s become obvious Ukraine is on a trajectory of total defeat, the very propaganda wellspring that once served such a powerful purpose has now made it impossible for the West to extricate itself from Ukraine. It is now too far into the game to admit everything they told us was wrong, and that Russia is actually powerful and Ukraine totally devastated. So now they’re forced into this awkward and contradictory hand-waving ritual wherein they must still maintain the line that Russia has been devastated with vastly disproportionately higher losses, yet the war must be brought to an end immediately because an unstoppable Russia stands to totally overrun a broken and defeated Ukraine.

It’s possible that as part of the ‘unveiling’ of Ukraine’s corruption, Trump could also choose to pull the wool off Ukraine’s true casualty figures—he’s already hinted as such with statements about casualties being in the millions, and much higher on both sides than acknowledged. But the fact of the matter remains, that Trump has not demonstrated any plausible leverage which could force Russia to the negotiating table at a time of Ukraine’s terminal decline.

Latest reports indicate that OPEC and the Saudis are not willing to play ball with Trump’s unrealistic demands for oil price reductions. From Wall Street Journal:

Image
https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil ... a-71c095ff

The United States is unlikely to be able to significantly increase oil production despite the policy of the US President Donald Trump administration to increase supplies of American energy resources, at the same time, Trump's oil policy could lead to a split with Saudi Arabia, the Wall Street Journal writes, citing informed sources and US officials.

According to the newspaper's sources, representatives of Saudi Arabia told former US officials that the kingdom does not want to contribute to an increase in global oil supplies, and some of the former officials passed this message on to Trump's team.

The OPEC+ Ministerial Monitoring Committee, co-chaired by Russia and Saudi Arabia, has decided not to change its current oil production policy, a representative of one of the delegations told Interfax.

According to Bloomberg, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said at a meeting that OPEC+ should stick to its current policy.


So, Saudi Arabia and OPEC have no interest in dropping oil to $45, as per Kellogg’s unrealistic dreams. That means no leverage exists that could possibly get Russia to the table other than using Russia’s top allies to apply pressure. Out of desperation, the US now seeks to mildly threaten China and India into putting their weight on Russia to end the war, but why would China want to help the empire shift focus to Taiwan so easily?

Establishment elites have been rattled by the recent hints that Washington will be pushing Zelensky into an election he’s certain to lose:

Image
https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine ... -election/
Politico above disgraces itself with naked apologia for undemocratic norms, implying that holding elections would allow Russia to meddle with ‘democracy’, yet completely ignoring the fact that not holding elections is far worse than merely ‘meddling’, but is an outright abrogation of democracy itself:

Kyiv, for its part, fears that holding elections at this juncture would imperil Ukrainian cohesion and open the country up to destabilizing Russian influence campaigns.

They quote a Ukrainian former minister in essentially validating that powers are aligning to remove Zelensky from his illegitimate seat:

A former Ukrainian minister, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss the sensitive subject, told POLITICO that “the alignment on elections between Washington and Moscow is worrisome,” adding, “I see it as the first evidence that Trump and Putin agree that they want Zelenskyy out.”

As a brief aside: the article goes to great lengths to even further justify not holding elections ‘during time of war’. What’s interesting is how shamelessly Western establishment sources have recently been able to justify the total annulment of elections, and the democratic process in general. It may seem tired to say at this point, but the manner in which the Romanian election cancellation was swiftly and almost indifferently brushed aside as a kind of procedural given was shocking. The same went for Georgia’s elections, and how readily Salome Zourabichvili’s illegal attempts to spurn the people’s vote were justified with cheers in the West, without even the slightest scruple or precaution. If Putin had declared martial law like Zelensky and stayed past his mandate, we would never hear the end of it, and a record round of sanctions would likely follow suit. All pretense has been shucked aside as it has become normalized in the West to entirely write off the electoral process if it does not suit the political exigencies of the moment; it’s shocking to witness this rapidly metastasizing political decay of the West.

But getting back: It’s apparent that Trump has no real strategy and is still winging it on Ukraine, as evidenced by the recent start-and-stop arms debacle:

Image

Does this mean Trump would be open to eventually ‘opening up the flood gates’ of major arms, should Putin spurn peace overtures? It’s hard to believe, because Trump has just been very vocal in his conviction that Europe must at the minimum match US’ previous financial commitments to Ukraine, and this seems unlikely as Europe is no closer to any form of concensus or solidarity, and is in fact fracturing more. So how would Trump open up such ‘flood gates’ while contradicting his stance, since it would cost inordinately more American dollars in relation to Europe’s support to do so?

As such, we can only assume that Ukraine will continue getting some bare minimum amount of aide, but not any ‘surge’-like shipments that could fend off Russia in any way. Thus, the only real chance for survival in the interim that Ukraine has left is to lower the mobilization age, which could buy them perhaps another year or year and a half at most. But Zelensky appears adamantly against this without major weapon surge guarantees—and on the eve of a potential forced election he’s unlikely to carry out an order that would be certain political suicide.

We can only surmise that the ambiguity and mystique surrounding Trump’s salvation of Ukraine will float Ukrainian hopes for a few months longer, in a kind of period of ‘hopeful delirium’. But somewhere around late spring or summertime, when it begins to dawn that Trump has no magic elixir, Ukraine’s political turmoil could begin coming to a terminal head, in one way or another. This would likely coincide with another more major springtime offensive push from Russia that would see pressure being put on several more axes, which would tighten the yoke around the AFU to boiling point extremes.

Another from Legitimny:

#hearings
Our source reports that independent Western think tanks predicted a negative scenario for Ukraine.

If the war lasts until January-March 2026, the Ukrainian army with a probability of 62% will lose its combat effectiveness, which will lead to large-scale collapse of the defense borders, launch a case with internal qualities and Maidans, which is likely to lead to surrender.

Zelensky (and his sponsors) know about this scenario, but he has been given the task of his «sponsors », to risk the future of Ukraine, for the sake of a personal future, and future demartis / globalists who are ready to sacrifice Ukraine for the sake of their game against Trump.

Otherwise, [Zelensky] will be completely merged. Perhaps even eliminated, and according to the media they will say that a Russian hypersonic rocket / killer hit, etc.
And it is unlikely that someone will ask a question, and why they have not eliminated it all the years, and then they suddenly decided.

So he pulls with a peaceful case, trying to extend the war as long as possible.


Lastly, it’s worth noting that in tune with the above discussion around Trump’s hardball approach, Trump released this new ‘interesting’ statement regarding Ukraine today, wherein he appeared to imply that any further assistance would have to be at the expense of major Ukrainian concessions of their most valued rare earth minerals: (Video at link.)

What an “ally”. If that was Putin demanding Ukraine’s natural resources in exchange for a friendly ‘relations’, he would be demonized to hell and back and his statements used as justification for Ukraine to join the other adversarial side. What has Russia ever done to Ukraine in line with this level of disrespect, that Ukraine should have persecuted Russian speakers and culture, spit in Russia’s face, and back-stabbed it?

Either way, it shows Trump’s continued support to Ukraine is not guaranteed, which adds quite the wrinkle to Ukraine’s future.

For his part, Arestovich made a prediction for Trump easily ‘dismissing’ Zelensky: (Video at link.)

It was followed by a very frank admission where Arestovich, with no frills, declared: “We have lost the war.”

Image

What more can one say?

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/rus ... -preparing

******

Control of Ukrainian mineral resources
February 4, 15:11

Image

The Russian Federation has taken control of up to 70% of Ukraine's mineral resources: most of the minerals are in the Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk and Luhansk regions, Forbes calculated. Their value is 15 trillion dollars.

P.S. It is worth noting that yesterday Trump actually demanded that the remaining Ukrainian deposits of valuable metals be transferred to the US control.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9651143.html

The face of the Poltava blogosphere
February 4, 19:01

Image

The face of the Poltava blogosphere.

In 2023, this blogger, when detained by man-catchers, swore at them and spat at one of them.
For this, he received 6 years in prison.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9651667.html

(Smart choice, beats being 'meat'.)

Poroshenko Condemns NATO
February 4, 20:58

Image

Funny. In Ukraine, Zelensky's gang is trying to sink Poroshenko preemptively, since the US wants to force elections.
They are pulling out the dirty laundry of the chocolate Fuhrer, including his public statements against NATO in 1999, when Poroshenko, as part of Medvedchuk's party (ha-ha), condemned NATO's aggression against Yugoslavia.

In fact, there is nothing surprising here, the oligarch Poroshenko was then hanging around with the so-called "pro-Russian" groups and was one of the founders of the notorious "Party of Regions", which declared strengthening ties with Russia and protecting the Russian language. Naturally
, since then Poroshenko has changed his tune many times, but nevertheless, now these statements against NATO are seriously being blamed on him politically, because NATO is above any suspicions and accusations in the coordinate system of Ukrainian political betrayal.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9651962.html

Google Translator

******

Brief report from the front, February 4, 2025

Russian Armed Forces probe enemy defenses in the direction of the Pavlograd-Pokrovsk highway. Report by Marat Khairullin with illustrations by Mikhail Popov.
Zinderneuf
Feb 04, 2025

Image
ЛБС 01.11.24=Line of Combat Contact November 1st, 2024. ЛБС 01.01.25=Line of Combat Contact January 1st, 2025. Зона активности=Zone of Activity.

On the Liman front, the Russian armed forces have expanded the zone of control west of the settlement of Ivanovka, pushing the enemy out of a line of strongholds along the tree line. North of the settlement of Kolodyazi (Kolodezi), they have occupied the trees. As a result, they have secured protected positions on a dominant height, which allows for maneuvering reserves for further advancement.

Image
ЛБС 15.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 15th, 2025. Зона Активности=Zone of activity.

In the Pokrovsk sector, the fighting is primarily positional, though its intensity remains quite high. Both sides are actively using drones. Russian aviation is operating across the entire sector. Forces are being regrouped, logistics are being improved, and rear areas are being equipped.

Active clashes are ongoing in the area of the settlement of Chunishino (Chunyshyne). Here, our forces are breaking through the enemy's defenses, which are covering the flank of the fortified area of Lisovka-Sukhoi Yar.

[Refer to the part of the map in the box for the next section.]

In the area of the settlement of Kotlino (Kotlyne) (Котлино), pressure is being applied along the railway leading to Pokrovsk. They are probing the enemy's defenses in the direction of the E50 highway (Pavlograd-Pokrovsk), while also conducting fire on positions northwest of Kotlino, which cover the approach to the Pokrovskaya mine (Шахта Покровская*).

In the area of the settlement of Udachnoe (Удачное), Russian forces are advancing in the eastern part of the settlement, simultaneously attacking from the south to pressure the enemy and push them out of fortifications near the Udachnaya railway station (ст. Удачное*) in the central part of the settlement (the 377th km railway station on the eastern side of the settlement is under the control of our forces).

Fierce clashes are also continuing in the center of the settlement of Uspenovka.

Image
ЛБС 01.10.2024=Line of Combat Contact October 1st, 2024. ЛБС 31.10.2024=Line of Combat Contact October 31st, 2024. ЛБС 01.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 1st, 2025. ЛБС 01.02.2025=Line of Combat Contact February 1st, 2025. Продвижение=Progress.

South of the settlement of Nadezhdovka (Nadiivka), Russian units are conducting offensive operations in the direction of the settlement of Kotlyarovka (Kotlyarivka). Pressure is also being applied in the southern direction to close a small pocket between Nadezhdovka and Sribnoe, which formed after the capture of the latter.

After pushing the enemy out of the settlement of Sribnoe/Serebryanoe, forward detachments entered the adjacent settlement of Zaporozhye.

https://maratkhairullin.substack.com/p/ ... bruary-ed6
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Thu Feb 06, 2025 1:30 pm

Fear of allies
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 06/02/2025

Image

After trying to save Ukraine and Europe from the enormous danger of Russian gas, the Polish president has found a new cause. “The end of Russia’s war against Ukraine could trigger an explosion of international organised crime, the Polish president has warned, saying that Kiev would need “massive support” to guarantee its security,” writes the Financial Times in its introduction to its interview with Andrzej Duda. These two risks that Duda warned about less than a week apart share two key points: the demand for massive mobilisation of resources in defence of Ukraine and the fear of the end of the war. This time, the Polish president’s concern is based not so much on geopolitical and economic issues, but on the security of his country, which shares a long border with Ukraine.

“Duda, who will step down as president in August after serving two five-year terms, said that in the event of a peace agreement between kyiv and Moscow, it would be imperative for Ukraine to receive support to rebuild the economy and “maintain order and security at the national level,” the article says, again insisting that, in the face of Donald Trump’s drive to end the war, Volodymyr Zelensky is demanding broad security guarantees, preferably NATO membership. However, Duda’s demand does not refer to Zelensky’s concerns about avoiding a new war, containing Russia or avoiding further territorial losses, but to the consequences that war usually has in the form of increased violence, especially once it tries to demobilize a huge population that has lived in conditions in which the use of force was the answer to all problems.

Duda “compared the situation to that of Russia in the early 1990s, when gangsterism and gun violence soared among veterans of the decade-long Soviet occupation of Afghanistan,” writes the Financial Times . “One only has to look back to the time when the Soviet Union collapsed and how much organised crime rates rose in Western Europe, but also in the US,” Duda says cynically, without putting the situation into context, which was not due to the withdrawal from Afghanistan in February 1989, but to the impoverishment and increasing misery in Russia brought about by the shock therapy of Chubais, Gaidar and the Chicago boys . “The return of Soviet troops “had that impact on the explosion of organized crime,” Duda said, noting that the casualties of Moscow’s large-scale invasion of Ukraine almost three years ago were much higher than those of the Afghan war,” Duda insists, always without mentioning the real causes of the chaos of that period, which the West considered the moment of hope for a new Russia.

The Polish president is clearly not concerned about the number of casualties, but about the huge quantities of weapons in circulation, which could easily fall into the hands of people with the ability to use them, military experience and perhaps even a desire to kill. Again, there is no mention of the context in which such demobilisation would take place after a ceasefire or armistice, but Duda focuses on the need to provide Ukraine with the means to maintain order. “Imagine the situation when thousands of people who come from the front return home. These people who are fighting with Russia, many of them will show mental problems,” he says, before finally introducing the economic question, adding that “their villages, their cities, where they will find houses in ruins, factories in ruins, without jobs and without prospects.” In the event of the future return of thousands of combatants, Duda offers only the solution of supporting Ukraine in maintaining order, primarily so that chaos does not spread across the border. In fact, this situation has already been experienced in Ukraine, although on a much smaller scale, with the return of those who had fought in the war in Donbass, who quickly reorganised themselves into street groups with a presence in the world of extortion. Others were very useful to the State when it came to carrying out actions that the Government could not undertake on its own, such as attacks on the media or the harassment of journalists or opponents, aspects in which the armed and organised far right acted as a subcontractor. The origin of this phenomenon is in Maidan, where groups such as the Praviy Sektor became the shock troops of the protest that would lead to the irregular change of Government.

The new Ukraine born out of the coup in Kiev chose to promote the creation and mobilisation of volunteer groups that formed various militias and were quickly sent to the Donbass front. The reason was not only the one that is often claimed, that the corruption of the Yanukovich years had undermined the capabilities of the regular army, but the lack of certainty that the troops would be ready to fight against their own people. Despite the presence of groups such as Strelkov's, who came from Russia and had a certain level of weaponry, the news that came from the Donbass rebellion showed rudimentary militias created from below, from the local population who, in many cases, carried only hunting rifles. What was shown on television was far from resembling the men in green , clearly members of the Russian army, who had been seen in Crimea and who had made possible the secession and adhesion to Russia without Ukraine having time to react.

In April 2014, at a meeting attended by Andriy Biletsky and Dmitro Korchinsky, still prominent figures in the armed far right fighting in the war, the Interior Ministry decided to include in its troops what would soon become the Azov battalion. Several transformations later, the Third Assault Brigade is the direct descendant of that step taken by Arsen Avakov and Anton Gerashchenko, today a respectable source for the Western press. Formed from football hooligans - for example, Dynamo Kiev in the case of Prokopenko and Zoria Lugansk in the case of Maksym Zhoryn, both veterans of the Borodach Division, the hard core of the first Azov - and hardened in street fights against anti-fascism and what they considered to be left-wing, these groups quickly achieved a position that did not correspond to their scant social support, which, as could be seen in the last elections, did not reach 2%. Even so, with a society demobilized and incapable of even carrying out a single act against the war and the economic blockade with which Ukraine condemned Donbass to collective punishment, these groups achieved a prominence from which it is difficult to shake off. In the rearguard, they harassed Inter journalists for the grave sin of broadcasting a Soviet film, they gained a foothold in Mariupol, where they committed several murders, and even acted as unofficial security for one of the main oligarchs, all without disarming and without ceasing to act in the grey areas of the economy. And without renouncing the internationalist ambitions of someone who sees himself with the moral superiority of imposing his model, first Ukraine and then Europe . Curiously, Biletsky's main foreign policy project has been Intermarium, a carbon copy taken from interwar Poland in which to impose a quasi-fascist vision of Dmitro Dontsov's nationalocracy adapted to the current situation.

Even more ideologised than a decade ago in their hatred of Russia, of everything Russian and Soviet, and, by association with that socialist past, of everything considered left-wing, groups such as the new versions of Azov, of Praviy Sektor, of Yehven Karas or Dmitro Yarosh are even more dangerous. The exalted propaganda both in Ukraine and in the Western media has made any person or group that has fought against Russia – even in the years when “Russia” was the population of Donbass – a hero for Ukraine’s freedom. Better armed and organised, these groups pose a challenge for the future of the State, which will have to demobilise hundreds of thousands of men – and some women – some of whom have been directly or indirectly in the business of war for a decade. European concern in this regard is logical and even Andriy Biletsky has warned of the possibility of anarchy.

The possibility of a violent return of a part of the population at a national level must also be added to the soldiers who have been encouraged to go as volunteers to Ukraine. Among them are a large number of Russian neo-Nazis who had taken refuge in Ukraine before the Russian invasion and others who have responded to the call of their comrades to liberate their country, as well as their Western counterparts. And while the members of Denis Nikitin's RDK, White Rex, are unlikely to return to Russia, where they are persecuted and would be received by the police authorities, in the Western case the return would be much easier. After all, they enlisted to fight against the common enemy and have collaborated with the cause. However, such a return causes fear, which is logical given the circumstances, but inconsistent with the position of the last decade. "At first, they call on the radical right and neo-Nazis from all over the world to fight in the war in Ukraine. “They are given NATO weapons, trained and turned a blind eye to their Nazi patches and memes about Hitler and Jews. They are called ‘freedom fighters’ who protect the ‘civilized world’ in the West from the ‘barbarian hordes’ in the East. And then they worry that these guys will turn into terrorists and criminals,” wrote Ukrainian historian Marta Havrysko. Useful proxies for war, exalted during hostilities as heroes of a common struggle, are not so welcome when they return to their usual activities armed with more ideology and military training. Against this, the solution is once again that of greater militarization, restarting a cycle that can only cause more violence. As has been the case in Ukraine for more than ten years.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/06/miedo-a-los-aliados/

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Forwarded from
War on fakes
🟢Today, at about 11:00 Moscow time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attempted to counterattack the positions of the Russian Armed Forces in the Sudzha area. A column of armored vehicles of the Ukrainian army moved out of the occupied city in the direction of the southeastern suburbs - Cherkasskaya Konopelka, Fanaseyevka and Ulanka.

🟢The aim of the strike, in all likelihood, is to improve the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk region - after the successes of the Russian Armed Forces south of Sudzha, all supplies to the Ukrainian group are under threat.

🟢There are reports of the Ukrainian Armed Forces reserves being pulled up from the Sumy side, with armored vehicles and tanks.

🟢The enemy's movement was recorded by the Russian Armed Forces' intelligence and the leading column of armored vehicles was attacked by artillery and drones. There is already data on objective control of defeats on the Internet, including engineering equipment that is in short supply for the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

🟢Active fighting is currently underway. The latest attempt at an enemy offensive is very reminiscent of similar actions a month ago near Berdyn, where during three days of fighting the Ukrainian Armed Forces suffered significant losses in equipment and manpower, without achieving any advancement..

***

Colonelcassad
Summary of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of 6 February 2025)

— In the Kharkiv direction, units of the North force grouping defeated formations of two territorial defence brigades in the areas of the settlements of Volchansk and Okhrimovka in the Kharkiv region.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost more than 25 servicemen, four vehicles and a field artillery gun. An ammunition depot was destroyed.

— Units of the West force grouping improved the tactical situation, defeated the manpower and equipment of three mechanized, mountain assault brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a National Guard brigade in the areas of the settlements of Peschanoye, Novaya Kruglyakovka, Zeleny Gai, Zagryzovo in the Kharkiv region, Shandrigolovo, Novoye, Yampolovka and Kolodezi in the Donetsk People's Republic.

The enemy's losses amounted to over 200 servicemen, a tank, five combat armored vehicles, including three M113 armored personnel carriers made in the USA, seven cars, five field artillery guns, including two of Western manufacture. An electronic warfare station and four ammunition depots were destroyed.

— Units of the "Southern" group of forces occupied more advantageous lines and positions. They inflicted losses on formations of two mechanized, assault, motorized infantry brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and two territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Predtechino, Katerinovka, Orekhovo-Vasilevka, Nikolaevka, Zelenovka, Sukhie Yaly and Chasov Yar of the Donetsk People's Republic.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 180 servicemen, three cars, a self-propelled artillery unit and an ammunition depot.

— Units of the "Center" group of forces improved their position along the forward edge. Defeated the manpower and equipment of two heavy mechanized, five mechanized, and a Jaeger brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the "Lyut" assault brigade of the Ukrainian National Police in the areas of the settlements of Druzhba, Shcherbinovka, Udachnoye, Novopavlovka, Tarasovka, Dzerzhinsk, Vodyanoye Vtoroy and Kotlino of the Donetsk People's Republic.

The enemy lost over 505 servicemen, five armored combat vehicles, including a US-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, two vehicles, and seven artillery pieces, including a Western-made self-propelled artillery unit.

— Units of the "East" force group continued to advance deep into the enemy's defenses. Defeated formations of a tank, three mechanized brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and three territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Burlatskoye, Novosilka, Novopil, and Rivnepil of the Donetsk People's Republic.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 135 servicemen, two combat armored vehicles, three cars, two field artillery pieces, including a US-made 155-mm self-propelled artillery unit "Paladin".

— Units of the Dnepr group of forces defeated the manpower and equipment of the mountain assault brigade, three coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of the settlements of Shcherbaki in the Zaporizhia region, Dneprovskoye, Yantarnoye and Nikolskoye in the Kherson region.

The enemy lost up to 45 servicemen, two vehicles and an unmanned boat.

***

Chronicle of strikes on the territory of Ukraine on February 5-6, 2025

Yesterday, day and night, the Aerospace Forces and missile forces struck targets in the Donbass, Sumy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhia, Kherson regions (the entire spectrum of weapons), Yuzhne, Odessa region (Kh-31P), the outskirts of Kamenskoye, Dnipropetrovsk region (OTRK), Kiev, Uman and Kanev, Cherkasy region, the outskirts of Poltava, Chernihiv, Vilkovo, Odessa region, Kirovograd region (Geraniums/Gerberas).

Chronicles of Geraniums:

February 5, 2025
• 11.30 Gulyaipole, Zaporizhia region - explosions. UMPK.
• 11.45 Saltovka, Kharkov - explosion. Lightning.
• 13.10 Dnipropetrovsk region - explosion. OTRK.
• 13.40 Kharkiv region - explosions. MLRS. North of the region
• 15:30 Sumy region - explosions. UMPK. Borderland.
• 16:10 Zaporizhia region - explosions. UMPK.
• 16:40 an explosion thundered in Zaporizhia. UAV.
• 17:15-17:20 Kharkiv region - explosions. 2 MLRS strikes. Vesyoloye.
• 17:17-17:20 Sumy region - explosions. 2 UMPK strikes. Explosions were heard in Sumy.
• 17:20 Donbass - explosions. UMPK.
• 18:15-18:20 Kharkiv region - explosions. MLRS.
• 19:15 an explosion thundered in Yuzhne, Odessa region. Air-launched missile.
• 20:15 and 21:00 outskirts of Balakleya, Kharkiv region - 2 explosions. OTRK.
• 21:35 Geraniums were detected simultaneously over Kharkiv and Sumy regions.
• 21:10 Sumy region - explosions. UMPK Prigranchye.
• 21:50 Novopavlovka, Dnipropetrovsk region - explosions. UMPK.
• 22:00 Khotyn, Sumy region - explosions. UMPK.
• 22:10 Khotyn, Sumy region, Zaporizhia region - explosions. UMPK.
• 23:40 Donbass, Sumy region - explosions UMPK.
• 23:55 Kherson - explosions.

February 6, 2025
• 00:05 Zmiev, Kharkiv region - explosion. OTRK.
• 00:15 Kharkiv - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 00:30 Sumy region - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 00:55 Cherkasy region - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 01:25
Uman, Cherkasy region - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera. • 01:35 Kanev, Cherkasy region - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 01:55 Kharkiv, Sumy - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 02:05 Chernigov, Poltava area - explosions. Geraniums/Gerberas.
• 02:10 Odessa - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 02:30 Uman, Cherkasy region, Kiev - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 02:35 Vinnytsia region - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 02:50 Sumy region - explosions. UMPK. Borderland.
• 02:55 Uman, Cherkasy region, Kiev, more explosions. Geraniums/Gerberas.
• 03.10 Uman, Cherkasy region, series of explosions. Geraniums/Gerberas.
• 03.15 Kharkiv region - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 03.25 Sumy region - explosions. UMPK. Borderland.
• 03.25 Zhitomir - explosion. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 03.35 Kramatorsk Donbass - explosions. UMPK.
• 03.35 outskirts of Sumy - explosion. OTRK.
• 03.55-04.20 Sumy region - explosions. UMPK. Borderland.
• 04.20 Sumy region, Donbass - explosions. UMPK.
• 04.30 Odessa and Dnipropetrovsk regions - explosions. Geranium/Gerbera.
• 04.55 Cherkasy, Kirovograd regions - explosions. Geranium/Gerbera.

In the photo yesterday's arrival of UMPK-500 at the enterprise in Konstantinovka

According to the monitoring of LOSTARMOUR.INFO
@lost_armour


https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

Russia Matters: Russia’s Close to Gaining Decisive Edge on Energy Front of War With Ukraine
February 5, 2025
Russia Matters, 2/3/25

“Russia is close to achieving a decisive edge on the energy front of the Russo–Ukrainian war,” argues Theresa Sabonis-Helf of Georgetown University. According to Sabonis-Helf’s estimates in War on the Rocks, Russian attacks have damaged Ukraine’s electrical grid so much that it has become 70% reliant on three complexes of nuclear reactors. “These reactors are increasingly threatened by the instability of the grid itself and could become unsafe to operate, forcing a shutdown and grid collapse,” she warns. Moreover, with Ukraine having submitted to heightened oversight by IAEA, “the decision to shut down its nuclear plants if the perceived risk becomes too high may not be entirely its own,” this Georgetown University professor observes in her data-rich commentary. “We now find ourselves in a moment in which a slow war of attrition could come to an abrupt end, resolved by the triumph of cold and darkness,” she warns.
The seizure of Velyka Novosilka, which has been described as a “most important fortified area” of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Donetsk region, underscores the effectiveness of a tactic that Russian forces have been employing to take towns: using its personnel advantage to attack relentlessly, gradually trapping Ukrainian forces in a pincer movement and forcing them to retreat to avoid encirclement, according to NYT’s Constant Méheut. Russia’s seizure of this eastern Ukrainian town “followed a familiar pattern: relentless infantry assaults, devastating casualties, collapsing Ukrainian defenses and their eventual retreat” with the battlefield dominated by drones, and armor playing a minimal role, according to the Economist’s article on this battle, entitled “Amid talk of a ceasefire, Ukraine’s front line is crumbling.” “It would not be accurate to claim that the Russians don’t know how to fight,” Maj. Ivan Sekach of Ukraine’s 110th Brigade, acknowledged in an interview with NYT.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/02/rus ... h-ukraine/

*******

VTsIOM poll on support for SVO
February 6, 14:59

Image

VTsIOM poll on support for SVO

VTsIOM presented the results of a monitoring survey of Russians about the special military operation of Russia in Ukraine.

Such monitoring has been conducted annually - since the very beginning of the SMO. Here are some of the results.

Do you support or not support the decision to conduct a special military operation of Russia in Ukraine?

- Rather support, 67%
- Rather do not support, 19%
- I find it difficult to answer, 14%

In your opinion, is the military operation for Russian troops rather successful or rather unsuccessful?

- Rather successfully, 65%
- Rather unsuccessful, 17%
- I find it difficult to answer, 18%

▪️As VTsIOM experts themselves note, throughout the entire monitoring period, there has been a consistently high level of public support for the SMO. Fluctuations in this indicator over a three-year period are statistically insignificant. For example, immediately after the beginning of the SMO, the level of support was 65%.

Fluctuations in assessments of the success of the special operation for Russian troops seem somewhat more noticeable. In February 2022, the figure was 70%, then it dropped to 59%, and has been at 65% for 2 years now.


https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/ana ... monitoring - VTsIOM research.

In general, the figures are at the level of the beginning of the SVO, when there were also slightly less than 68% of supporters. Later, the figure grew and at its peak at certain moments reached 72-73%, but in general, all this is at the level of statistical error. As well as in the case of those who do not support. There, the figures fluctuated from 15 to 20%.
At the moment, the Russian Federation maintains sufficient stability of society, in the event of the implementation of scenarios of dragging out the war until 2027, which, from a financial point of view, has already been partially advanced on both sides.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9655135.html

Google Translator

******

Krynky: Very British Military Cataclysm
Posted by Internationalist 360° on February 5, 2025
Kit Klarenberg

Image

In November 2024, previously US-funded Ukrainska Pravda published a little-noticed investigation, documenting in frequently disquieting detail the catastrophic failure of Kiev’s long-running effort to capture the village of Krynky in Russian-controlled Kherson, October 2023 – June 2024. That it was to all intents and purposes a British operation, from deranged inception to miserable conclusion, was perhaps the most shocking revelation. As the proxy war teeters on collapse, it’s high time London’s covert role in fomenting relentless escalation, and getting enormous numbers of Ukrainians pointlessly killed, is critically scrutinised.

In June 2023, the Kakhovka Dam’s destruction almost completely submerged large swaths of Kherson, a key proxy war frontline, depopulating these areas in the process. In the wake of this incident, responsibility for which remains a point of significant contention, Kiev decided to secure a beachhead on Russian territory on Dnipro’s left bank. As Ukrainska Pravda notes, the initiative was and remains “one of the least publicised operations by the Ukrainian Armed Forces,” despite lasting as long as the Battle of Bakhmut.

This omertà endures today, with many “experienced officers” involved in and aware of the operation unwilling to answer any questions put to them by Ukrainska Pravda. One pseudonymous marine quoted “was so concerned about the privacy” of his conversations with the outlet, he contacted them “from different numbers almost every time.” The rationale for this conspiracy of silence is obvious. The Krynky operation’s failure was so egregious, it easily ranks among the uppermost tier of biggest and worst modern military calamities.

Image

Moreover though, the effort had a supremely grand ultimate purpose, in which the surviving Ukrainian marines involved in the operation believed so strongly, several of them spoke of Kiev’s failed Krynky incursion in the same terms as the June 1944 Normandy landings – D-Day. Ukrainska Pravda reveals it was hoped securing the Krynky beachhead would be a “game-changer”, opening a second front in the conflict, allowing invading marines to march upon Crimea and all-out victory in the proxy war.

This fantastical objective has hitherto never been publicly divulged. A December 2023 BBC article nonetheless hinted at intended greatness. It discussed the horrendous experiences of Ukrainian soldiers who “spent several weeks on the Russian-occupied side” of the Dnipro, as Kiev sought to establish its Krynky “bridgehead”. Along the way, the British state broadcaster noted parenthetically, “President Volodymyr Zelensky has been keen to talk up this offensive, framing it as the beginning of something more [emphasis added].”

‘Constant Fire’

Per Ukrainska Pravda, Krynky’s foundations were laid in February 2023, when it was announced London, “perhaps Ukraine’s most active and determined ally”, would begin a training program for Ukrainian marines and pilots. Behind closed doors, Britain – “a naval power” – concurrently began lobbying Kiev to “start using marines for waterborne operations.” However, the proposal “did not resonate…for a long time” with Zelensky, or then-Commander-in-Chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi. So the British took the “radical step” of dispatching an “official delegation” to Kiev, to convince the pair.

Image
Sunak and Zelensky, both 5’5, embrace

“The British team persuaded Zaluzhnyi, and he said: that’s it, we’re creating the Marine Corps,” a source informed the outlet. Five-week-long training programs were then instituted by London. Ukrainians were taught on British territory “how to overcome water obstacles: to cross a river, land on the shore and conduct operations on land.” Survivors of the operation told Ukrainska Pravda, “they realised they were being prepared for something big and different from their previous tasks during their stay in the UK.”

Come August, almost 1,000 Ukrainian marines had reportedly been tutored “in small-boat landing operations and amphibious assaults”, in training environments identical to where they would land in and around Krynky. The stage was thus set for seizing the beachhead, which commenced two months later. “Almost immediately” though, “the operation’s biggest flaw – its planning – began to work against the marines,” producing “huge losses”. Ukrainska Pravda acknowledges the mission “wasn’t fully thought through in every aspect,” which is quite the understatement.

Ukrainian marines reaching Krynky required them either travelling across the Dnipro via boat, or being dropped off at numerous small islands nearby and swimming to land. Resupply was also supposed to be conducted via boat deliveries. In the aforementioned December 2023 BBC article, a marine participating in the catastrophe revealed it was expected by the operation’s British planners that once the Ukrainians landed, their adversary “would flee and then we could calmly transport everything we needed.” Alas, “it didn’t turn out that way”:

“The entire river crossing is under constant fire. I’ve seen boats with my comrades on board just disappear into the water after being hit, lost forever to the Dnipro river…When we arrived on the [eastern] bank…they knew exactly where to find us. They threw everything at us – artillery, mortars and flamethrower systems. I thought I’d never get out.”

To make matters worse, “a lot of young guys” with zero combat experience were being fed into Krynky. “It’s a total nightmare…some of our marines can’t even swim,” the embattled marine bitterly relayed to Britain’s state broadcaster. Fearing “things will only get worse,” he added “no one” dispatched to the “hell” there knew “the goals” of the operation in which they were engaged. “Many” believed their commanders had “simply abandoned” them, and “our presence [has] more political than military significance.”

‘Almost Impossible’

Ukrainska Pravda gravely notes, “not all [marines] made it” to Krynky, and “not all who did returned.” Even those who survived the perilous journey “frequently sustained injuries or were killed” upon arrival, “because the Russians immediately targeted them with artillery.” During landings, “every second mattered”, to the extent the Ukrainians quickly “abandoned the use of life jackets” for their river crossings, as detaching one onshore took half a minute, “and there [could] be casualties during that time.”

Image
One of the few Ukrainian boats that made it across the Dnipro River

Fatal operational blindspots and blunders didn’t end there. Resupply boats were likewise relentlessly targeted by Russian forces, making it virtually impossible to equip marines with even the most basic essentials, including ammunition, bandages, food, medicine, and water. The Ukrainians resorted to using hexacopter drones “to deliver all sorts of things” to the frontline, “even blood for transfusions.” Meanwhile, one marine bitterly informed Ukrainska Pravda, “heaps” of artillery and rocket support “that would work in our favour” promised by their superiors never materialised.

“HIMARS will fire like machine guns!” they were told, “but we were deceived in the end.” Regardless, marines were still expected to carry out extraordinarily grand missions once – if – they reached Krynky. For example, three marine brigades were tasked with capturing a 30-kilometre-long beachhead around the village, on foot and without heavy equipment, “using units already exhausted from fighting in Donbas,” within just four days. This also necessitated thrusting up to seven kilometres inland, into Russian territory.

“The order seemed insane to everyone at the time,” a participating marine told Ukrainska Pravda, “we warned that it would be a massacre, but we were told to keep pushing.” Their dire predictions were proven completely correct, the mission abruptly failing after “a considerable number of highly valued personnel” were blown to bits by Russian airstrikes, missiles, and tank fire. Yet, this senseless turkey shoot paled in comparison to the disaster and insanity of Britain’s plot for Kiev to march on Crimea.

A survivor of the Krynky operation said this “ultimate goal” was “almost impossible.” To accomplish it, Ukrainian marines “needed to cover a vast distance” – 80 kilometres – into territory that had been under heavy Russian occupation for 18 months. Furthermore, it was “impossible to establish a foothold” in many of the areas where marines landed, which were “nothing but swamp”. Unable to dig shelters or trenches in the terrain, they were forced to hide from Russian bombardment in craters left by previous attacks.

Some marines intentionally “got lost” on islands near Krynky to avoid the river crossing. Others tried to reach the area and return floating “on car tyres”. At least two “heroes” involved in the operation “refused to act” on certain orders from their commanders, “as doing so would have been suicidal.” Some wounded soldiers literally took their own lives, “because there was no evacuation.” These were just a few of the “tragic stories” to result from Britain’s futile, covert proxy push on Crimea.

‘Remain Silent’

The onset of winter was “when the situation on the [Dnipro’s] left bank started to really deteriorate.” The Russians transferred significant assault forces to the area, used glide bombs “to destroy a large part” of Krynky, and “figured out how best to target Ukrainian forces’ river routes, especially at the turns, where the boats had to slow down, and landing points.” Moscow’s artillery onslaught left the area “cratered like the moon.” A reconnaissance officer told Ukrainska Pravda:

“Each time our battalion entered [Krynky], the situation got worse and worse. People got there, only to die. We had no idea what was going on. Everyone I knew who was deployed to Krynky are [sic] dead.”

The situation further “took a dark turn” in early spring 2024. Not a single boat could enter or leave the area. “By May, the situation was a disaster” – but it was not until July the last of Ukraine’s marines withdrew from the area, being forced to swim back. “Most people” Ukrainska Pravda interviewed about Krynky “are convinced the operation dragged on for at least several months longer than it should have.” One despaired:

“We had to withdraw in spring at the latest, during the foggy season. We could have got all of our soldiers out at that point. It would’ve saved people’s lives. But instead we waited until nothing could be done any longer. Until the very last moment.”

During the operation’s entire nine months, Krynky never came under full control of Kiev’s British-trained and directed marines. They managed to capture, recapture, and hold “about half of the village” at most, per Ukrainska Pravda. “As of late 2024, all of Dnipro’s left bank in Kherson Oblast is under Russian control,” the outlet concludes. No wonder that today, neither Ukrainian nor Western officials are “particularly vocal about Krynky, preferring to remain silent on the issue.”

Image
The ravaged terrain of Krynky today

Zaluzhnyi “has never issued a public statement about the operation.” In May 2024, he was appointed ambassador to Britain. Lieutenant General Yurii Sodol, Ukraine’s former Marine Corps commander who oversaw Krynky, was dismissed from the armed forces in November 2024, ostensibly after failing a military medical exam. Total killed and wounded figures for the operation remain concealed, although Ukrainska Pravda learned just one brigade lost around 700 personnel during the nine-month-long debacle.

Had it been wave after wave of poorly prepared, ill-equipped and militarily unsupported British marines dispatched in large numbers to certain death in Krynky, one might expect their commanders and anyone responsible for planning the operation to face severe censure. As it was Ukrainians doing the fighting and dying in an unwinnable, literal quagmire, British officials are likely to remain immune from repercussions. In a bitter irony, Zelensky may well be joining them in London in due course.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/02/ ... cataclysm/

(That's all, folks)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Fri Feb 07, 2025 12:38 pm

Waiting for the plan
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 07/02/2025

Image

“America’s allies expect President Donald Trump’s administration to present the long-awaited plan to end Russia’s war against Ukraine at the Munich Security Conference in Germany next week,” Bloomberg wrote yesterday , citing “people briefed on the matter.” So far, Keith Kellogg, the Kurt Volker of Trump’s second term, has limited himself to warning of the importance of stopping the war and insisting on the enormous capacity of the US president to reach agreements. For the moment, all diplomacy with Russia has been carried out under the strictest secrecy and it has not even been confirmed whether there has been contact between the two presidents (something that seems unlikely, although it is known on both sides that there have been conversations between officials of the two governments). The absence of leaks or mentions of specific points of the plan suggests that it does not exist or that the strategy will be to follow the plan designed by Kellogg himself for the America First Policy Institute, which from its name implies the approval of Trumpism. Contradicting Bloomberg , “a media outlet I have not spoken to,” the White House official on Ukraine policy denied that he would present any plan, a task that is “first and foremost the responsibility of the president, not Keith Kellogg.” The person in charge of implementing a plan to end the conflict continues to show signs that the master plan with which Donald Trump was going to achieve peace quickly and easily does not yet exist.

During the election campaign, Trump made achieving peace in Ukraine one of his main foreign policy slogans. However, since his inauguration, when his speech has changed to acknowledge the complexity of the issue and the difficulties involved in achieving this goal, there has been little information about what the White House intends to do and the conditions under which he expects Russia and Ukraine to find themselves in relation to the ceasefire they want to achieve. Apart from the brief comments made by the American president about using Ukraine’s mineral wealth as payment for military assistance, the main indication that Ukraine is a priority for Washington can be seen in Keith Kellogg’s repeated appearances on Fox News . Greenland, Canada, the Panama Canal, tariffs against China or Trump’s “bold” and “controversial” – two of the adjectives most used by the Western press to describe the ethnic cleansing plan in Gaza – proposal for the Middle East have relegated Ukraine to the background, a position that does not bother Volodymyr Zelensky at all. However, reality and the balance of power prevent the Ukrainian president from obtaining from his American counterpart a proposal similar to the one Netanyahu has obtained.

Unlike the Israeli leader, with whom Zelensky shares the desire to see the unwanted population leave and empty the territory – he once encouraged all people who feel Russian to leave Ukraine and move to the Russian Federation “for their own good and that of their children” – the Ukrainian president does not hear from his allies any grand proposals in his favour, but rather indications that a compromise will be necessary. Unlike Palestine, which lacks leadership beyond Ramallah’s clientelism and has no army other than the militias decimated by the Israeli assault on Gaza, Russia has an economy that has proven sufficiently resilient and an army that has not been broken despite the hundreds of billions that the West has invested in the proxy war to confront it.

Since the war entered the trenches in the spring of 2022, it has been clear that the conflict was heading for an inconclusive end in which neither army would be able to completely defeat its opponent. The slow Russian advance in Donbass and the failure of the multi-million-dollar counteroffensive in 2023 are two examples in which a deep break in the front has not been possible, which reinforces a scenario in which any ceasefire, armistice or end of the war, whether false or not, will have to occur through negotiation. Not even Donald Trump, whose enormous creativity was highlighted yesterday by those around him, has been able to propose innovative ideas outside of this reality.

In his interview with Piers Morgan, one of the star presenters of British television, the Ukrainian president once again stressed the need to continue the military flow to kyiv, the moral obligation of the Western allies to continue supporting Ukraine and the desire for new sanctions against Russia. However, the facts on the ground and the logic of the balance of forces force Zelensky to keep his feet on the ground. The triumphalist discourse maintained by Mikhail Podolyak or Andriy Ermak or the figure of 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in the war are increasingly less convincing both in Ukraine and in the West.

The credibility of the war hero is limited when all parties - except the European Union, the only actor that has not yet changed its rhetoric - accept that the moment of negotiation is approaching and the demand for elections begins to appear, to which the president argues that in order to fight for democracy it is not necessary to hold elections in war. The absence of a president with a valid mandate no longer bothers only Russia, but also Keith Kellogg, who this week reminded Kiev that countries at war have been able to hold elections in the past.

Little concerned about his legitimacy, which has not been questioned by power groups or the army in Ukraine, Zelensky insists on marking a speech of absolute confidence in his chances of victory and in achieving his interests. Increasingly Trumpian in his way of twisting reality to the point of inventing it, the president stated that Vladimir Putin does not want to negotiate with him, since he fears him. Hours earlier, in the same interview in which he expressed his willingness to negotiate directly with Vladimir Putin “if that is what will end this” and achieve a “fair peace” – a euphemism for a peace in which Kiev gets everything it asks for – the Ukrainian president insisted on the idea of ​​recovering nuclear weapons. Kellogg’s response was made publicly on Fox News . “The chances of them recovering their nuclear weapons,” Kellogg said in reference to weapons that, in reality, were the property of the Soviet Union, “are between slim and non-existent. Let's be honest, we know that's not going to happen," he said, visibly upset.

Zelensky's mention of negotiations should not be confused with an opening to compromise, which the Ukrainian president will try to avoid at all costs. To do so, Ukraine is trying to use the cards at its disposal. Yesterday, after the failed attempt a few weeks ago, Ukrainian troops restarted their counteroffensive in the Russian region of Kursk, a scenario that even General Syrsky openly admits is the most important for Ukraine. The Ukrainian military effort is not seeking to recover part of its lost territory, practically impossible today in the face of Russia's greatest strength, but rather to strengthen itself in that place that it can use as a bargaining chip. To this must be added the impetus for rearmament, which includes nuclear rhetoric but, above all, the deliveries of its European partners.

“The Ukrainian air fleet continues to develop,” Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on social media yesterday. The Ukrainian president was not boasting about his own progress or the results of local industry, but about the delivery by France and Denmark of Mirage 2000 and F-16 fighters respectively. Foreign subsidies remain the main way of sustaining the war and preparing for the day after. If Trump had the intention or ability to meet the deadlines he set himself, these aircraft would be destined to prepare the Korean scenario of an unstable and dangerous armed peace that Ukraine and European countries seem to want to move towards.

Although it cannot be said that Trump has lost interest in Ukraine, especially its natural resources, the US's priorities at the moment are far from the negotiating table, where he should bring a plan that has not yet been finalised. After denying that he will present it next week, Keith Kellogg confirmed that he will visit the Munich Security Conference, where he wants to hear first-hand the opinions of European leaders in order to pass them on to Donald Trump. But it will not be until 20 February that his first visit to Ukraine takes place, a trip that was initially to take place before Trump takes office. The deadlines are being pushed back with no sign of proposals. Perhaps it will be then that the White House will begin to outline a plan. "As plans develop to end this carnage, we must make sure that all those involved are on board," he said yesterday. For the moment, not even he seems to have been on board . "Once we can have these face-to-face conversations, then we can start working on concessions," he said. The work is still ahead and any rush Donald Trump may have had to achieve peace in Europe has disappeared.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/07/a-la-espera-del-plan/

Google Translator

There is no plan, only 'feelings'. The commentators who insist that Trump has some cunning plan(s) are fooling themselves, vainly trying to shore up their earlier predictions that the second coming of Trump would somehow reverse the evil of Biden. Both are worse.

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
Summary of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of February 1-7, 2025 ) Key points:

- The Russian Armed Forces liberated four settlements in the DPR and Kharkiv Oblast in a week;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 2,020 servicemen, 21 tanks, and 161 armored vehicles in the area of ​​responsibility of the North group in a week;

- The North group in the Kursk Oblast hit the artillery and manpower of 15 brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in a week;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 395 servicemen and two ammunition depots in a week due to the actions of the Dnepr group of forces;

- The Russian Armed Forces carried out eight group strikes in a week, hitting gas and energy infrastructure facilities that support the operation of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex; - Fighter aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces shot down a Su-27 of the Ukrainian Air Force in an air battle; - The Russian Armed Forces destroyed a Neptune long-range guided missile and six Hammer guided air bombs of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in a week

; - Units of the "Southern" group improved their tactical position, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 1,510 servicemen in a week; - The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 1,835 servicemen in a week in the area of ​​responsibility of the "West" group of forces; - The "East" grouping killed almost a thousand Ukrainian servicemen in a week; - The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 3,720 servicemen in a week in the area of ​​the "Center" group of forces

▫️Units of the "East" group of forces continued to advance into the depth of the enemy's defense. The formations of the tank , five mechanized, airborne assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the marine brigade and three territorial defense brigades were defeated.

The enemy lost over 955 servicemen, three tanks, including a Leopard tank made in Germany, 19 combat armored vehicles, 14 cars and 31 field artillery guns, including seven made in NATO countries. Two electronic warfare stations were destroyed.

▫️Units of the Dnepr group of forces defeated the manpower and equipment of the mechanized , infantry brigades , three coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the National Guard brigade . The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 395 servicemen, a tank, two combat armored vehicles, 37 cars and eight field artillery guns. Six electronic warfare stations and two ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️ A Su-27 of the Ukrainian Air Force was shot down in an air battle by fighter aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces .

▫️Over the course of a week, air defense systems shot down a long-range Neptune guided missile , six French-made Hammer guided aerial bombs , 41 US-made HIMARS multiple launch rockets , and 630 aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️Over the course of a week, 19 Ukrainian servicemen surrendered on the contact line .

▫️ In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following have been destroyed: 653 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 42,617 unmanned aerial vehicles, 592 anti-aircraft missile systems, 21,242 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,514 multiple launch rocket systems, 21,326 field artillery pieces and mortars, and 31,384 units of special military vehicles.

***

Colonelcassad
🎖🎖🎖 The Russian Ministry of Defense on the progress of repelling the attempted invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces into the territory of the Russian Federation in the Kursk Region (as of February 7, 2025)

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to defeat the formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the territory of the Kursk Region.

- Units of the North group of forces thwarted an attempt at counter-offensive actions by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the direction of the settlements of Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Ulanok in the Kursk Region. All enemy attacks were repelled.

- In addition, during the offensive actions, defeat was inflicted on formations of a tank, heavy mechanized, four mechanized, two airborne assault brigades, a marine brigade and three territorial defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of the settlements of Gogolevka, Goncharovka, Lebedevka, Malaya Loknya, Mirny, Nikolaevka, Nikolsky, Novaya Sorochina and Sverdlikovo. Two enemy counterattacks were repelled . - Strikes by operational-tactical and army aviation and artillery fire hit enemy manpower and equipment in the areas of the populated areas of Viktorovka, Guevo, Zaoleshenka, Kazachya Loknya, 1st Knyazhiy, Kositsa, Kurilovka, Loknya, Martynovka, Makhnovka, Melovoy, Novaya Sorochina, Sverdlikovo, Sudzha, Cherkasskaya Konopelka, Cherkasskoye Porechnoye, as well as Basovka, Belovody, Vodolaghi, Veselovka, Mirlogi, Zhuravka and Yunakovka in the Sumy region. - Over the past 24 hours , the Ukrainian Armed Forces have lost more than 370 servicemen, 11 tanks, seven infantry fighting vehicles, three armored personnel carriers, 38 armored combat vehicles, nine cars, three artillery pieces, three mortars, an MLRS launcher , a Tunguska anti-aircraft gun and missile system , three engineering obstacle clearance vehicles and a bridge layer , as well as three UAV control posts and an ammunition depot have been destroyed. - Including during the repulse of the counteroffensive in the direction of the settlements of Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Ulanok, the enemy lost more than 200 people. Eight tanks, five infantry fighting vehicles, an armored personnel carrier and 30 armored combat vehicles, as well as three engineering obstacle clearance vehicles, a bridge layer and other equipment have been destroyed. In total, during the hostilities in the Kursk direction, the enemy has lost more than 58,230 servicemen, 348 tanks, 251 infantry fighting vehicles, 197 armored personnel carriers, 1,797 armored combat vehicles, 1,853 vehicles, 412 artillery pieces, 46 multiple launch rocket system launchers, including 13 HIMARS and six MLRS made in the USA, 18 anti-aircraft missile system launchers, eight transport and loading vehicles, 106 electronic warfare stations, 15 counter-battery radars, five air defense radars, 37 units of engineering and other equipment, including 17 engineering obstacle clearing vehicles, one UR-77 mine clearing unit, as well as nine armored repair and recovery vehicles and a command and staff vehicle.

The operation to destroy the Ukrainian Armed Forces formations continues.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

Fibre-optics vs vampires: telegram war roundup

Casualty speculations. Kurakhove, Velyka Novosylka. Andriivka, Novopavlivka. Organization reforms, Azov given too much responsibility. Drone wars - fibre optics and hexacopters.
Events in Ukraine
Feb 06, 2025

Time for a roundup of what our Ukrainian military experts have been saying on telegram. Today’s agenda:

*Numbers: how much territory was lost in January, and interesting speculations on the true number of Ukrainian losses and mobilization figures

*Soldiers vs society: complaints that Ukrainians in areas controlled by Russia aren’t resisting against mobilization the way that Ukrainians are doing so against Ukrainian mobilization. Other tirades against civilians and pro-Russian civilians at the frontlines

*Analysis of the Kurakhove and Velyka Novosylka frontlines

*Recent organizational reforms at first greeted positively among Ukrainian analysts. But then, negative attention was drawn to the fact that Azov’s 3rd Assault Brigade, generally considered among the most effective fighting units, has been assigned far more frontline territory than it can feasibly control.

*Drone wars: ongoing Russian superiority in the field of fibre-optic drones. Russia develops its analogue of the Ukrainian Baba Yaga drone. Problems with new Ukrainian state codified drones.

*Financial limitations: how new limits of bank transfers in Ukraine (demanded by the IMF) have led to major difficulties for frontline units in receiving military gear (which is often crowdfunded).

Image

Numbers
Deepstate, February 1:

In January, the enemy occupied 325 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory.

The enemy continues to conduct active offensive operations across multiple sectors, but almost everywhere, their advance is being slowed down. Most of the significant gains made by the enemy result from our own mistakes, which keep repeating.



Buniatov, January 29:
It's sad to admit, but volunteers born in 2007 are already joining the army.


Frontline journalist Volodymyr Boiko on Zelensky, February 5:

Image
Boiko

One of the Greatest Leaders of the World (c) is a happy man. Due to the peculiarities of his intrauterine development, he does not comprehend what exactly he reads from the teleprompters every evening for the delight of his subjects. Even more so, the Greatest (c) cannot grasp the meaning of what he tells foreign journalists according to pre-prepared texts. Because if the Greatest (c) ever realized what he was actually spouting on television, he would be horrified.

For example, in an interview with British journalist Piers Morgan, One of the Greatest Leaders of the World (c) stated that the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in terms of fatalities over nearly three years of war amounted to 45,100 people.

Let’s take the Greatest (c) at his word—most likely, this number is taken from the briefing document on which his speech was based. However, in Ukraine, only those servicemen whose deaths are officially registered in civil registry offices based on a medical death certificate or a court ruling are considered deceased. In other words, as of early February 2025, the figure of 45,100 refers only to those whose bodies were successfully evacuated, delivered to forensic bureaus, and identified. The rest—the majority of the dead, whose bodies could not be retrieved—are classified as missing in action. For three years, they will remain on the personnel lists of their military units, and their relatives will continue to receive financial support and additional compensation of at least 125,000 UAH per month.

The number of those killed whose bodies could not be evacuated can be estimated based on the total number of individuals recorded in the Unified Register of Persons Missing Under Special Circumstances—63,000. Of course, some of these are civilians, and some are captured military personnel whose imprisonment has not yet been confirmed. However, it is quite reasonable to assume that the remains of 55,000–60,000 servicemen were left behind on the battlefield.

There’s another nuance. When the Greatest (c) cites the figure of 45,100, he emphasizes that this number represents the fatalities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine alone. But there are also other military formations within the Defense Forces, such as the National Guard, the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense, the Security Service of Ukraine, the State Border Guard Service, and others.

Thus, the total number of fallen servicemen can be estimated at 105,000.

Furthermore, according to the Greatest (c), in December 2024, there were 370,000 wounded, and by early February, that number had risen to 390,000. Again, it is unclear what category of wounded he refers to—those who, due to injuries, concussions, or combat trauma, have been deemed unfit for further military service, or those who were hospitalized for the same reasons but are likely to return to their units after treatment? It seems to me that the Greatest (c) meant the first category—those who are permanently unfit for service. If that’s the case, the irreversible monthly losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine alone amount to 13,000 people.

At the same time, it has been repeatedly reported that Ukraine mobilizes (mostly forcibly) 15,000–20,000 conscripts per month. Yet even this number is insufficient to compensate for personnel losses, making the situation at the front simply catastrophic. This raises the question: where are the rest? The answer is quite simple—they are deserters and shabulants (EIU - by this he means those who fictitiously serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Boiko uses such a term to make fun of the name of the head of the Anti-Corruption Center, Vitaliy Shabunin, who became a suspect in a criminal case for evading military service. See this article of mine on the patriotic Shabunin’s draft-dodging).

The total number of deserters is estimated at 200,000—these are servicemen who have abandoned their military units to evade service. Meanwhile, the number of shabulants is no less than 50,000—soldiers who manage to avoid military duties through collusion with their commanders.

Now, the most important thing is to make sure that One of the Greatest Leaders of the World (c) never learns about these calculations—such information might upset him.


(Paywall with free option.)

https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/p/ ... s-telegram

*****

Ted Snider: Did We Just See Trump’s Ukraine Peace Plan?
February 6, 2025
By Ted Snider, Antiwar.com, 2/3/25

A leaked document has given us a first glimpse at Trump’s peace plan for Ukraine. According to the Ukrainian online newspaper Strana, U.S. officials handed the plan to European diplomats who then passed it on to Ukraine.

The existence of the plan has not been verified, and Andriy Yermak, head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, has said “no ‘100-day peace plan’ as reported by the media exists in reality.”

If the plan is real, if it is being put on the table by the Trump administration as a finished product that, if rejected, will lead to more sanctions on Russia and more weapons for Ukraine, as Trump has threatened, then the war will go on, and Trump’s promise to quickly end the war will vanish in a puff of delusion. But if the plan is put on the table as a starting point for negotiations, then there is hope. And there is suggestion that it is a starting point.

Here is an item by item analysis of what each side may consider acceptable in the plan and what each side may insist on negotiating further.

The process begins with an immediate phone call between Trump and Putin followed by discussions between Washington and Kiev. That the plan may be intended as a starting point for negotiations is suggested by the fork in the schedule that negotiations will continue if common ground is found or pause if it is not. Further negotiations would lead to an Easter truce along the front line, an end of April peace conference, and a May 9 declaration of an agreement.

Russia has said that the Istanbul agreement could still be “the basis for starting negotiations.” In June, 2024, Russian President Vladimir Putin set out a peace proposal based on the Istanbul agreement, but adjusted for current territorial realities. Putin’s proposal had four points. Ukraine must abandon plans to join NATO, they must withdraw from the four annexed territories, they must agree to limits on the size of their armed forces, and they must ensure the rights of ethnic Russians in Ukraine.

The alleged Trump plan can be evaluated by comparison to Putin’s proposal and to recent statements made by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

1. Ukrainian troops must withdraw from Kursk at the time of the April Truce

This would be acceptable to Russia who would insist on Ukrainian troops leaving its territory.

For Ukraine, this would be a difficult concession, not because of the withdrawal but because of the timing. Aside from the strategically catastrophic hope that the Kursk invasion would divert Russian troops away from the Donbas, the point of taking Russian territory was to use it to barter for the return of Ukrainian territory. Giving up the bargaining chip before the negotiations begin would nullify Ukraine’s hope of using it to force the return of more of its land.

2.Ukraine must end martial law and hold presidential elections by the end of August and parliamentary elections by the end of October
This could be a bitter pill for Zelensky. Recent polling has shown that Zelensky could well lose that election.

Elections would be welcomed by Russia who see Zelensky’s government as intransigently hostile and anti-Russia. This would legally transfer hope for regime change to Ukrainians.

3.Ukraine must declare neutrality and promise not to join NATO. NATO must promise not to expand to Ukraine
Ukraine was willing to abandon its NATO hopes in Istanbul. Though accepted by Kiev as inevitable, it would now be a painful concession. In the absence of NATO membership, it would be a hard sell to Ukrainians that the war after the Istanbul talks was worth the devastation.

For Russia, this point is key, and there can be no negotiations without it. It would be the key accomplishment to get the two sided promise that Ukraine will not ask for membership and NATO will not offer it.

4.Ukraine will become a member of the EU by 2030
This item is acceptable to both. EU membership will be necessary for Zelensky to present to Ukrainians as something that was worth fighting for. Ukraine is now free to pursue its ambitions to turn west and join Europe.

Though Russia had concerns in 2014 with the EU’s Association Agreement with Ukraine because of its implied integration of Ukraine into the European security and military architecture, Putin has long left EU membership on the table for a postwar Ukraine, and that was specifically agreed to in the Istanbul agreement.

5.Ukraine will not reduce the size of its armed forces and the U.S. will continue modernizing the Ukrainian armed forces
While Ukraine will welcome this, it may not be enough. Russia will have a hard time with this one.

This is like “the Israeli model” that then Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett says Putin and Zelensky were both open to in the early days of the war. But, in the absence of NATO, Zelensky has been adamant about U.S. supported security guarantees. And, already by Istanbul, Russia was demanding limits on Ukraine’s armed forces. At the very least, modernized Ukrainian weaponry would have to be defensive with a cap on firing into Russian territory.

6.Ukraine refuses military and diplomatic attempts to return the occupied territories but does not officially recognize Russian sovereignty
This item goes not far enough for Russia and too far for Ukraine. Zelensky has accepted that “De facto, these territories are now controlled by the Russians. We don’t have the strength to bring them back.” So, he will accept not attempting to return the occupied territories militarily. He has also insisted that Ukraine would never officially recognize Russian sovereignty over those lands. But the added clause, that he will not attempt to return them diplomatically, may be going further than Zelensky has been willing to go. In the case of Crimea, he has reserved the right to try to bring territory back diplomatically.

For Russia, the de facto recognition of the territory it occupies will likely be enough. In his proposal, Putin insisted on the complete withdrawal from the territories while saying nothing about Ukraine officially recognizing Russian sovereignty over them. However, though Russia may be willing to negotiate over Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, they are less likely to accept only the lands east of the current front without it including all of the Donbas.

7.Some sanctions on Russia will be lifted, including EU bans on Russian oil
This item will likely be acceptable to Ukraine, especially since temporary duty on sales of oil will be used to restore Ukraine. It will likely be acceptable, at least as a starting point, for Russia.

8.Parties that support Russian language and peaceful relations with Russia can participate in Ukraine’s elections. State actions against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and Russian language must cease
Though difficult for Zelensky and some forces in Ukraine to accept, protection of language, religious and cultural rights is the second key Russian demand along with NATO.

9.The idea of a European peacekeeping force is to be discussed separately
The recognition that security guarantees is both key and difficult for both parties is realistic. Neither side will agree to a European security force: Russia because it goes too far; Ukraine because it goes not far enough.

If this plan is a final draft whose rejection means negotiations end, then the war will not end. But if Trump’s plan is intended as a starting point to negotiations – the most difficult of which may be the security guarantees – then there is hope.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/02/ted ... eace-plan/

******

Ukraine - Intensity Of War Has Decreased

Over the last month the war in Ukraine has become less intense.

The number of daily losses on the Ukrainian side, as provided by the Russia Ministry of Defense, has decreased from an average 2,200 per day in early November 2024 to an average of 1,600 per day in late January 2025.

Image

Ukraine has acknowledged that the level of violence has decreased (edited machine translation):

Over the past seven days, the number of assault operations of the Russian army on the entire front line has been significantly reduced.
This is evidenced by the data of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to the military telegram channel Deep State.

Just yesterday, 80 attacks by Russians were recorded, while at the peak in December, this figure had reached 292.

Deep State provided statistics on Russian attacks by month (daily average):

November - 5,205 (174);
December - 6,247 (202);
January - 5,087 (164);
4 days of February - 381 (95)


The reasons for the decrease are unknown. It may well be weather related as a relatively warm winter has caused a prolonged muddy season which makes assaults over open land more difficult.

Another reason might be ongoing negotiations.

Ukrainian ATMCMS attacks on Russia seem to have stopped for now as have Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. (This observation may be deceiving though as such attacks usually appear in bursts.)

Yesterday the Russian side confirmed for the first time that diplomatic contacts with the U.S. have intensified:

"There are indeed contacts between individual departments, and they have intensified recently. But I can't tell you any other details, there is nothing else to say," Peskov told reporters, according to Russian state-owned media.

Next week General Kelloggs, Trump's Ukraine envoy, is supposed to announce further plans for peace talks over Ukraine. I do not expect any real change of U.S. strategy. Russia will have to win the war on the battle field.

Meanwhile: Europe’s Ukraine Delusion continues.

And a lecture in political history (recommended!):

Glenn Diesen and his book The Ukraine War and the Eurasian World Order in a Book Club discussion with Jeffrey Sachs (video).

Posted by b on February 6, 2025 at 14:19 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/02/u ... .html#more

******
The Holodomor Lobby
Life and Afterlife of Gareth Jones feat. Philip Colley (Part 2)
Moss Robeson
Feb 05, 2025

Gareth Jones’ Literary Executor Philip Colley discusses the use and misuse of his great-uncle’s testimony about the early 1930s Soviet famine. Part one covered the remarkable life of the “real Mr. Jones,” including his dealings with the Nazis, and part two addresses his remarkable “afterlife,” which took off in the early 21st century with the rise of the “Holodomor lobby.” As Philip has said, the famous journalist Gareth Jones (1905-35) was “kidnapped in life by bandits, and kidnapped in death by Banderites.”



https://banderalobby.substack.com/p/the-holodomor-lobby

******

The US financed more than 90% of all Ukrainian media
February 6, 22:53

Image

The US financed more than 90% of all Ukrainian media.
That's all you need to know about "free and independent journalism in Ukraine."
In fact, almost any Ukrainian "journalist" is a character receiving a salary from the US through a shell from USAID and in fact are budget employees. American budget employees who depend on money coming/coming to USAID from the American budget through the State Department.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9656276.html

Dzerzhinsk. February 2025
February 6, 20:56

Image

Footage from 99% liberated Dzerzhinsk.
The last major enemy point on the territory of the mine complex near the waste heap on the northwestern outskirts of the city remains to be completed.
After that, the liberation of the city will be announced. The city itself was seriously damaged during the fighting.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Broadcasts of military operations in Ukraine as usual here https://t.me/boris_rozhin

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9656028.html

Farm Berdin 2.0.
February 6, 17:11

Image

In the morning, the enemy launched a powerful attack in the Sudzha area in the direction of Ulanok and Cherkasskaya Konopelka, using up to 40 units of equipment and several hundred infantry. As a result, the enemy lost more than 25 units of armored vehicles, including 3 tanks and 2 engineering vehicles (1 based on the "Abrams"), as well as more than 100 people. The rest scattered among the plantings in the area of ​​​​Cherkasskaya Konopelka and the village of Ulanok. The enemy suffered the main losses from artillery and drone strikes. Now the enemy's infantry is being finished off in the plantings.
At the same time, they are waiting for an attempt at a new attack from the enemy. For now, the farmstead Berdin 2.0 will work.

Broadcast of hostilities as usual in Telegram https://t.me/boris_rozhin (photos and videos from the scene of the battles were published there today)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9655376.html

Google TRanslator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sat Feb 08, 2025 1:02 pm

Script needs
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 08/02/2025

Image

Virtually forgotten amid the increasingly imperialist rhetoric of Donald Trump, who in his first month back in power is setting the international agenda with increasingly exaggerated, less legal and completely out of place threats, the Ukrainian front continues to operate in the same way as in recent months. As a priority area in which to put pressure on Russia in order to obtain better cards in a possible negotiation, Ukraine is currently making a new attempt to advance on the territory of the Kursk region. As a few weeks ago, the initial push yielded some progress, partly thanks to the fog, which prevented the use of Russian aircraft and drones with the necessary intensity, but the situation is still not particularly favourable to kyiv, whose greatest successes are in the fight, in many cases imaginary, against North Korean troops. The contingent of the People's Republic of Korea was used as an argument to approve the use of Western missiles against Russian territory and to demand faster arms deliveries. It has been said of these troops that they lacked humanity, that they acted like human hordes, that they were addicted to pornography, that they died en masse, that due to language problems they were victims of friendly fire, that they murdered Russian soldiers or even that their faces were burned to prevent them from being recognized.

After months and articles in major media outlets announcing their arrival, mass death and withdrawal, there is still no sign of these troops. The only tangible indication of the Korean presence in Kursk is a video in which Ukraine presented two supposedly Korean prisoners of war, information that Russia denied claiming that they were Russian soldiers from the Tuva region. As analyst Patricia Marins commented, it is hardly credible that a contingent of tens of thousands of soldiers and such high casualties that it had to be withdrawn from the front offers as its only evidence of its existence a video of two captured soldiers, especially if, as Ukrainian and South Korean intelligence claim, they were acting in human waves attacking the enemy as cannon fodder. Ukraine's word remains dogma and the media has reported the story as told to them by Kiev, mainly from the mouth of Kirilo Budanov's military intelligence, the man who said he was preparing camps to house the masses of North Korean soldiers who defected to Ukraine. These successes against the People's Republic of Korea are a way of measuring the strategic results that Ukraine has achieved so far in its Russian adventure, which has managed to slightly embarrass Russia, which still cannot recover all of its territory, but which has not substantially changed the dynamics of the main front.

Yesterday, several days after the capture of the Toretska mine in the industrial zone of the town became known, which once again acted as a shield so that Ukraine could resist the Russian assault for a while longer, Russian sources began to speak of the liberation of Toretsk, which like other cities of the PRD recovered by Russian troops, will recover its previous name, Dzerzhinsk. Less media-driven than other battles, the fight for the city has been long, tedious and has resulted in enormous destruction of the city and an undetermined number of casualties. The Russian objective in Dzerzhisnk was clear. On the one hand, it is still necessary to move the front as far away from the cities of the People's Republic of Donetsk as possible. After the loss of Avdeevka and then Kurajovo, Ukraine can no longer use its cheapest artillery, the 155-millimeter shells that it has used so much to intimidate the population of Donetsk-Makeevka, an urban agglomeration that housed around a million people before the war. However, Gorlovka remains exposed. The fall of Niu York, the first brick in the Ukrainian wall of the first line of defense, opened the door to the advance on Toretsk, where Oleksandr Syrksy's troops have fought to the end. In his usual line of prioritizing battles that he considers important, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine sent trusted troops there as reinforcements. If in the case of Avdeevka the chosen ones were the soldiers of the Third Assault Brigade of Andriy Biletsky, on this occasion they have been those of the 12th Brigade of the National Guard of Ukraine, the Azov of Denis Prokopenko. Reinforcements, the will to continue fighting as long as they have been able to hold on to part of the city and the possibility of continuing to receive supplies has meant that the battle has extended into this week. Ukraine is holding on to part of the outskirts, enough for Deepstate to claim that the fight is not yet over. However, it has been clear for some time that the battle is over. The news of the fall of Toretsk has already had a first consequence, the announcement by Zelensky that North Korean troops have returned to the Kursk front. Once again, the script needs a twist and the People's Republic of Korea is used as a creative tool.

The announcement of the capture of the city confirms the prudence with which the Russian command continues to act, in no hurry to boast of its progress, which it does not confirm until the positions have been consolidated and there is no risk of an immediate counterattack by Ukraine. The end of the battle for Dzerzhinsk means the destruction of the last barrier south of Konstantinovka, the last important city before the urban agglomeration of Slavyansk-Kramatorsk, which Russia hopes to approach from two directions, from the south and the east. Even slower than the battle for Dzerzhinsk, the fight for Chasov Yar, east of Konstantinovka, continues. Only then will both cities form part of a single front of approach in the direction of Slavyansk-Kramatorsk, an objective that is not in sight in the short term.

In addition to advancing towards leaving Gorlovka in the rear, the capture of Dzerzhinsk also implies freeing up part of these troops to join the fight for Pokrovsk-Krasnoarmeysk, a much more complicated objective where the operation does not involve a direct assault as has occurred in Toretsk, but rather surrounding the city, creating an operational encirclement that eliminates all the strategic value of the city and undermines the Ukrainian defensive efforts by preventing supplies. This objective will not be achieved quickly either, since the Ukrainian resistance in this area is considered strategic despite the fact that kyiv has already lost, for example, access to the Pokrovsk mine, whose coal supported the country's metallurgical industry.

To continue fighting, as Ukraine wants to do, the supply of weapons must continue. According to the Ukrainian president, domestic production provides 40% of the weapons for the war, a figure even less credible than the 45,000 soldiers that Zelensky claims the country has lost in almost three years. Although the domestic industry provides a significant part of the drones used, Ukraine's dependence on Western weapons, especially American weapons, is absolute. This is demonstrated by the weapons used on the front and, above all, by Ukraine's insistence on maintaining supplies from the United States, to whom kyiv is willing to hand over its mineral reserves to ensure that they continue. Like North Korean troops, a danger to Ukraine when they are needed to justify the demand for more aid and missing when what is required is to sell a real or imaginary success, the weapons are domestic or American according to the demands of the script. Ukraine, whose only ideology is nationalism, needs to boast about its own production, but always without failing to highlight the essential role of the exceptional country, the United States, which according to Zelensky provides 30% of the weapons of war.

“US arms shipments to Ukraine briefly paused in recent days before resuming over the weekend as the Trump administration debated its policy toward Kiev, according to four people briefed on the matter,” Reuters wrote on Monday, announcing the return to normality after a halt following the new measures imposed by the US administration. But calm is not complete in Ukraine, aware that the funds approved by Congress in 2024 are running out. “The funds that Congress approved for arms packages to Ukraine during the Biden administration are almost empty, with most of the weapons already in Ukraine,” Yahoo News said on Wednesday . Ukraine already has all the military assistance it will receive for a while. “It is too early” to talk about a new military aid package, Zelensky admitted in one of the interviews he gave this week. In the midst of a season of cuts, the White House is unlikely to approve urgently - though it is not out of the question in the longer term, especially if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire before negotiations - new funds for military assistance to Ukraine. On Thursday, Keith Kellogg again insisted on the possibility of tightening sanctions as a tool to weaken Russia. That, and not the delivery of arms to Ukraine, as envisaged in his plan published last year, seems to be the way the United States intends to force Moscow to make concessions to Ukraine in a future diplomatic process.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/08/31517/

Google Translator

*******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
Summary of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of February 8, 2025 ) Main points:

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 560 servicemen in the "Center" area of ​​responsibility;

- The Russian Armed Forces hit a gas and oil industry facility that supported the operation of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex, as well as the infrastructure of Ukrainian military airfields in 152 districts;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 240 servicemen in the "West" grouping zone in a day;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 135 servicemen in the "East" grouping zone in a day;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 190 servicemen and Spartan APCs in the "South" zone;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 80 servicemen as a result of the actions of the "North" and "Dnepr" groups.

▫️Units of the "East" group of forces improved their tactical position. They defeated the manpower and equipment of the mechanized brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and two territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Razliv, Novopol of the Donetsk People's Republic and Gulyaipole of the Zaporizhia region. The Armed Forces of Ukraine lost up to 135 servicemen, a vehicle and four field artillery guns, including a 155 mm self-propelled artillery unit "Caesar" made in France.



▫️Units of the Dnepr group of forces defeated formations of three coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of the settlements of Nikolaevka, Tokarevka, Sadovoe and Dneprovskoe in the Kherson region. The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 50 servicemen, two combat armored vehicles, including a US-made M113 armored personnel carrier , three cars and an electronic warfare station.



▫️ Operational-tactical aviation , strike unmanned aerial vehicles , missile forces and artillery of the Russian Armed Forces groups inflicted damage on a gas and oil industry facility that supported the operation of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine, the infrastructure of military airfields, storage depots and preparation sites for the launch of unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment in 152 districts.

▫️ Air defense systems shot down a US-made HIMARS multiple launch rocket system and 93 aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following have been destroyed: 653 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 42,710 unmanned aerial vehicles, 592 anti-aircraft missile systems, 21,254 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,514 multiple launch rocket systems, 21,397 field artillery pieces and mortars, 31,393 units of special military vehicles.

***

Colonelcassad
Chronicle of strikes on the territory of Ukraine on February 7-8, 2025

The largest Geranium raid this year took place.
Yesterday, during the day and at night, the Aerospace Forces and missile forces struck targets in the Donbas, in the Sumy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhia, and Kherson regions (the entire spectrum of weapons), Kyiv and its environs, Vyshgorod, Brovary, Irpen, Obukhov, Fastov, Kozyn in the Kyiv region, Krivoy Rog, Poltava and Lubny in the Poltava region, Smela and Kanev in the Cherkasy region, Dnepropetrovsk, Starokostiantyniv in the Khmelnytsky region, Chernihiv, Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia, Kirovohrad, Odessa, and Poltava regions (Geraniums/Gerberas).

****

Colonelcassad
During the night, air defense systems destroyed and intercepted 36 Ukrainian drones:

18 UAVs were shot down over the Rostov Region; 11 UAVs were intercepted over the Volgograd Region; 5 were destroyed over the Belgorod Region and 2 over the Krasnodar Region.

In the Volgograd Region, they tried to attack an oil refinery. There was no fire, no casualties.

After the UAV attack, windows and window frames were damaged in 14 apartment buildings in Rostov-on-Don, a lyceum was prepared as a temporary accommodation point.

In the Slavyansky District of Kuban, as a result of the UAV attack, the roofs and windows of 5 houses were damaged. There are no preliminary casualties.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

Brief report from the front, February 7, 2025

Conditions for an offensive in the direction of Konstantinovka are ensured! Report by Marat Khairullin with illustrations by Mikhail Popov.
Zinderneuf
Feb 07, 2025

Image

Image
ЛБС 10.11.24=Line of Combat Contact November 10th, 2024. ЛБС 01.01.25=Line of Combat Contact January 1st, 2025. ЛБС 01.02.2025=Line of Combat Contact February 2nd, 2025.Участок Продвижения=Area of Advancement.

On the Kupyansk front, the Russian armed forces continue to expand their foothold in the areas of Novomlynsk and Dvurechnaya (Dvorichna). After clearing a pocket on the banks of the Oskol River, they advanced northward and captured the settlement of Figolevka (Fyholivka). Our military continues to consolidate and improve their positions on the foothold near the settlement of Topoli (check the first map, “Topoly” near the border in the Northeast).

In Chasov Yar (no changes on the map), fighting continues on the northern outskirts of the city. In the area of high-rise buildings, Russian Armed Forces units advanced, gaining control of several more buildings. Active battles have begun for the Shevchenko neighborhood and Workshop No. 2 in the southern part of the city. Our advance to new positions and their consolidation has impacted the supply lines of the Armed Forces of Ukraine grouping in the city, as noted in the enemy's own reports. Additionally, our forces are increasing pressure on the southern sector in the direction of the settlement of Stupochky.

Image
ЛБС 01.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 1st, 2025. ЛБС 01.02.2025=Line of Combat Contact February 1st, 2025. Участок Активности=Area of Activity.

The Russian Ministry of Defense announced the liberation of the settlement of Dzerzhinsk (Ukrainian: Toretsk). The last pockets of resistance in the city have been cleared. The settlement of Druzhba, located to the north, has also been liberated. On the left flank of the sector, active assault operations are underway in the central part of the settlement of Shcherbinovka (Shcherbynivka). For a long time, the UAF has terrorized the population of Gorlovka (Horlivka) with shelling from the Dzerzhinsk area. By pushing the line of combat away from the city, the enemy's ability to carry out such attacks is reduced. The capture of Dzerzhinsk creates conditions for further pressure on the enemy and the development of an offensive in the direction of Konstantinovka (Kostiantynivka).

Image
ЛБС 01.10.2024=Line of Combat Contact October 1st, 2024. ЛБС 31.10.2024=Line of Combat Contact October 31st, 2024. ЛБС 01.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 1st, 2025. ЛБС 01.02.2025=Line of Combat Contact February 1st, 2025. Продвижение=Progress.

On the Pokrovsk and Kurakhovo fronts, positional battles are primarily taking place. Despite their positional nature, activity in certain areas remains high. Our forces continue to push through the defenses in Udachnoe, attempting to consolidate in the southern part of the built-up area. Intense fighting is ongoing in the area of Andreevka. Our units have managed to establish themselves almost in the center of this settlement.

https://maratkhairullin.substack.com/p/ ... bruary-dc4

*****

Even US Messaging Outlet RFE/RL Having Trouble Prettying Up Trump Planning to Buy Ukraine Rare Earths Empty Bag
Posted on February 7, 2025 by Yves Smith

It’s amusing to see a US influence operator, RFL/RL, trying to preserve an image of accuracy while carrying official water. Here, the case in point is Trump’s promotion of the idea that the US could continue to arm Ukraine if Ukraine mortgaged its future by paying the US via ownership or other concessions of its rare earths deposits, or as Trump put it, “rare earth” and one presumes other strategic materials.

Here we have Trump again proving himself to be the truest follower of the Kamala Harris exhortation, “What can be, unburdened by what has been.” Here the “what has been” includes what is. In this case, it’s that Ukraine has bupkis in the way of rare earths. Worse, the media has been simply parroting what Trump said as if Ukraine really had these goodies, as opposed to engaging in some throat clearing. So it sure looks like Trump is prepared to send Ukraine more arms in return for an empty bag.

Yours truly is not expert in these matters. Yet it was pretty obvious Trump and press transcriptionists were out over their skis on “rare earth”. One has to think the Chinese and Russians and many many others are sniggering at yet another display of imperial incompetence.

In fairness to RFE/RL, they did go to the trouble of making clear that Trump scheme and mainstream media amplification are barmycakes, and even found a source that could thinly dignify the Trump, erm, misapprehension. We are reposting the entire RFE/RL piece in full below, but here are the key bits. Please note we’ve posted charts and links in comments from Statista that come to essentially the same findings as the RFE/RL source:

Image

Those who are not math challenged may have noticed that the Thailand deposits are a full four orders of magnitude smaller than those of China. As Dima of Military Summary is wont to say, “That’s a lot!” And of course, that Ukraine is nowhere on this list.

RFE/RL also kindly provided the production ranking:

Image

It’s surprising to see the US rank as #2, particularly after all the handwringing about the US having abandoned rare earths mining and processing. For instance, from a 2019 article in Mining.com, How the US lost the plot on rare earths:

Unfortunately, the United States Military and dozens of high-tech North American companies are as dependent on China for their rare earth elements as the United Launch Alliance is on Russian-made rockets…

Without rare earths mined and processed in China, America would be unable to manufacture military hardware – rare earths are great multipliers they are used in making everything from computer monitors and permanent magnets to lasers, guidance control systems and jet engines. There is no substitute and no other supply source is available other than China. Civilian uses of rare earths would also be put in jeopardy. This includes rare earth elements incorporated into electric vehicle motors, computer chips, fiber-optic cables, flat-screen televisions, wind power turbines and nuclear power, just to name a few uses.


In 2010, we posted US Faces Substantial Obstacles to Increasing Rare Earths Production. It discussed both MIT Technology Review and New York Times articles on why the US had ceded rare earths production to China despite having adequate supplies:

In fact, the while the [MIT] article does discuss US versus foreign engineering expertise in rare earths mining, it describes in some detail how difficult rare earths mining is in general (more accurately, not the finding the materials part, but separating them out) and the considerable additional hurdles posed by doing it in a non-environmentally destructive manner. Thus the rub is not simply acquiring certain bits of technological know-how, but also breaking further ground in reducing environmental costs.

And this issue has frequently been mentioned in passing in accounts of why rare earth production moved to China in the first place. It’s nasty, and advanced economies weren’t keen to do the job. China was willing to take the environmental damage. For instance, the New York Times points out:

China feels entitled to call the shots because of a brutally simple environmental reckoning: It currently controls most of the globe’s rare earths supply not just because of geologic good fortune, although there is some of that, but because the country has been willing to do dirty, toxic and often radioactive work that the rest of the world has long shunned.

Forgive this digression, but it seemed useful to provide a mini-primer in case this Trump proposal has a longer half-life than it ought to. I am mystified at the US production figures being as high as RFE/RL shows in light of the upset about the US abandonment of the market as recently as 2019. Was there indeed a technology breakthrough? Did Biden provide an environmental waiver that went under the radar?

So back to RFE/RL, which provided an almost deadpan statement after the first of the two rare earths charts:

Ukraine has substantial amounts of rare earth minerals, according to the Ukrainian Geological Survey.

So the same Ukraine propaganda machine that brought us the Ghost of Kiev and most recently, the Trump-amplified claim that Russia has suffered a million deaths in the Ukraine war has apparently been treated as truthful when as far as I can tell, no reputable source on mineral reserves is buying what it is selling.

Many commentators have tried to burnish the Trump remarks by saying he likely meant lithium (which is not a rare earth) and other strategic minerals. Wellie, as various commentators have already pointed out, Ukraine has four major lithium deposits, two of which are under Russia’s control. The severity of gnashing of teeth when Russia recently captured the second of these two areas suggests that it represents the largest supply. Readers are encouraged to pipe up.

Ukraine has a lot of frackable gas, but over 80% is in Kharkiv or other eastern oblasts. Iron ore and coal are presumably mainly in the east since that’s where the Donbass heavy industry grew up. Ukraine’s black earth (its famed fantastic soil) is both east and west of the Dnieper, but looking at the distribution and type of crops farmed, my impression is that it’s disproportionately in the east (as in the land area east of the Dnieper is roughly a third of the country, but the black earth concentration in the east could plausibly be 50% of the total).

And any Ukraine mortgaging of these assets is subject to prior claims, such as nearly 30% of the farmland being owned by oligarchs and/or the likes of BlackRock and Vanguard. And if you think Westerners will come out ahead in a tangle with Ukraine’s oligarchs and the Banderite muscle they hire (as in specialists in the worst sort of torture), I have a bridge I’d like to sell you.

Another aside: it’s curious how Trump’s inexact patter repeatedly leads observers to interpret what he must have meant, as if trying to make sense of what a non-native speaker of the language is saying. This turns Trump communication into what Marshall McLuhan called a hot medium, like radio, where you hear words and then often add your own visual images. Hot media are active and engaging. Cold media like TV are passive because little is left to the imagination.

But to the big question of where Trump might be going with this “arms for minerals” talk. Here I have to differ with the Duran duo of Alexander Mercouris and Alex Christoforu. If I am representing them correctly, they see proposed bargain as Trump reducing his Ukraine dealings to a transaction. They contend that is being a big downgrade from the Collective West “we’re all in because democracy” patter. That may have been the US position but it was never Trump’s position.

Trump campaigned on the claims that the war would never had happened had he been re-elected in 2020 and he could do a deal to wind it up within 24 hours of assuming office. He never was on board with the “Zelensky as Churchill” and other conflict sales patter.

Trump’s willingness to entertain continuing to supply Ukraine with more materiel, even on supposedly paid basis, contradicts the former Trump promise to end the war quickly. And it’s a bastard cousin of the Ursula von der Leyen scheme to fund the war by floating bonds backed by the frozen Russian assets. It’s a a very shaky pretext for pretending to lend to Ukraine when the security interest, as they say in the business, can’t be perfected. In reality, any “loans” are subject to eventually being substantially or entirely written down.

But the fact that Trump floated this idea does not mean he is serious. It may simply be an effort to create another option, that the US still has a way to continue to supply weapons to Ukraine that Trump can make look palatable to the American public. The reason for doing that would be to try to bolster the weak US position in bargaining with Russia. That’s consistent with the NBC report of divisions in the Trump ranks on Ukraine: that some Trump insiders, like Mike Waltz and Keith Kellogg, want to double down on the failing Biden strategy of pumping more arms into Ukraine to achieve the Mission Impossible of improving their battlefield position before sitting down to talk.

By RFE/RL staff. Cross posted from OilPrice

*President Trump expressed interest in securing access to Ukraine’s rare earth minerals in exchange for continued US military aid.
*Ukraine responded positively to the proposal, indicating openness to collaboration with partners who can help protect their land.
*The demand for rare earth minerals, crucial for high-tech industries and defense, has intensified due to China’s dominance in production and recent export controls.

There’s already a flurry of diplomatic wrangling, backchannel talks, and public posturing ongoing between Washington, Moscow, and Kyiv, to figure out how to halt the nearly 3-year-old all-out Russian war on Ukraine.

Now add this to the mix: U.S. President Donald Trump wants to condition future U.S. aid to Ukraine on getting more access to the country’s valuable “rare earth” minerals — minerals that are in increasing demand for batteries, computers, smart phones, and electric cars, not to mention weaponry.

“We’re looking to do a deal with Ukraine where they’re going to secure what we’re giving them with their rare earth and other things,” he told reporters on February 3.

“I want to have security of rare earth. We’re putting in hundreds of billions of dollars. They have great rare earth. And I want security of the rare earth, and they’re willing to do it,” he said.

The reaction from Ukraine? We’re not opposed.

“We are open to the fact, that all of this can be developed together, along with our partners who can help us protect our lands,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said at a news conference in Kyiv. “This is absolutely fair. I talked about this in September when we met with President Trump.”

Image

So What Is A Rare Earth Mineral, Anyway?

Rare earths are a class of about 17 minerals — for example, yttrium, cerium, lanthanum — that are found in trace amounts throughout the Earth’s surface. They’re in increasing demand because of their use in high-tech products. The ongoing race to make batteries smaller and lighter, and more powerful and longer-lasting, involves the use of rare earth minerals. Defense industries also need the minerals for weaponry and related technology.

Other rare earth minerals are used as chemical catalysts in magnets, computer drives, or generators.

The biggest hurdle for rare earth extraction is that you have to dig up a lot of soil to get an adequate amount of the minerals because they’re in such trace amounts. And then you have to separate out and refine them before you can employ them in technology or machinery.

Ukraine has substantial amounts of rare earth minerals, according to the Ukrainian Geological Survey.

It also has less-rare, more abundant minerals that are also coveted for use in technology and cutting-edge industries: lithium, for example, which is used widely in batteries of all sorts, and titanium, which is used in airplane manufacturing. Some estimates say the country’s lithium deposits could be valued at billions of dollars.

Trump may also have been referring to these minerals; he did not make that clear.

For the record, Ukraine also has far greater deposits of other, more common mineral resources — coal, iron ore, oil and gas – which provide major revenues for the country and also major investment opportunities.

Many of those resources are located in parts of Ukraine that are occupied by Russian forces — and may ultimately end up under total Russian control.

So Why Does Trump Want Them?

The race to locate, secure, develop, and monetize rare earth minerals has been accelerating for years now. Estimates of the minerals in North America stand at about 3.6 million tons in United States and more than 14 million tons in Canada, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, and the United States is the second-largest producer in the world after China. Australia and Burma are other major producers.

But in 2023, China, which produces about 60 percent of all rare earths in the world and processes nearly 90 percent, rattled global markets when it announced a ban on rare earth extraction and production.

That set off alarm bells in the West, where lawmakers and policymakers worried that Western technology would be crippled by a lack of supply of rare earth minerals.

China further jolted the discussion on February 3 — the same day Trump spoke to reporters — when it slapped tariffs on a range of U.S. goods in retaliation for tariffs announced over the weekend by Trump.

Beijing also imposed export controls on tungsten, tellurium, ruthenium, and molybdenum: critical minerals that are important in high-tech manufacturing but are not categorized as rare earths.

Can Trump Really Condition Aid To Ukraine On Access To Rare Earths?

Probably.

Ukraine is heavily dependent on the United States for the weaponry and equipment that has kept Kyiv in the fight against the Russian invasion. As of September, Congress had appropriated $174.2 billion for Ukraine-related purposes, with the majority of that going to Defense Department and defense-related accounts, according to the Congressional Research Service.

Trump, who has made ending the Ukraine conflict a top priority, and his advisers have signaled that part of the negotiations will include enticements and pressure to get Kyiv and Moscow to the negotiating table. Conditioning future U.S. aid on Ukrainian concessions is key to that; convincing Kyiv to give U.S. investors more access to rare earths and critical minerals could be a big part of the calculus.

Without U.S. weaponry, Ukraine’s military would buckle amid the grinding onslaughts from the bigger and better-equipped Russian troops. How long before its defenses would collapse outright is unclear.

Image

It’s not the first time that Trump conditioned U.S. weaponry on concessions from Ukraine, specifically President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. During his first presidency, Trump was impeached by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives after a phone call with Zelenskyy. In the call, Trump appeared to say he would unfreeze U.S. aid if Zelenskyy reopened an investigation into a Ukrainian energy company whose board included the son of Joe Biden, at the time a former vice president.

Lawyers argued a U.S. president has no legal right to withhold funding that has been appropriated by Congress.

Trump, who denied any wrongdoing and described the conversation as a “perfect phone call,” was acquitted by the Republican-controlled Senate.

This time around, Republicans control both chambers of Congress so it’s unlikely there will be strong congressional pushback on conditioning U.S. aid. Moreover, Trump and his advisers have embraced a more muscular approach to White House decision-making, arguing Congress has less involvement in executive branch decisions.

What Does The Kremlin Think About All This?

Russia also has substantial rare earth and critical mineral reserves, though its production capacity lags substantially behind China and other countries.

Broadly speaking, anything that complicates life for Ukraine is seen as a good thing for Moscow, which knows U.S. weaponry has kept Kyiv in the fight.

Russia, which has the upper hand on the battlefield, is doing its own positioning ahead of potential peace negotiations. That includes flattery from President Vladimir Putin.

One of the Trump White House bargaining chips has also been the threat to flood Ukraine with even more U.S. weaponry — which would be bad for Russian troops and the Kremlin.

Asked by reporters about Trump’s rare earth comments, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it appeared the White House was looking to make Ukraine pay for aid from Washington.

“This is clearly an offer to Ukraine to buy U.S. assistance,” he said.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/02 ... y-bag.html

******

Russia’s Foreign Spy Agency Claims That NATO Wants To Depose Zelensky Through New Elections
Andrew Korybko
Feb 07, 2025

Image

Trump’s return to office heralds a new era in International Relations so he might want to replace liberal-globalist leaders like Zelensky with like-minded populist-nationalist ones in order to help him implement his agenda.

Russia’s foreign spy agency (SVR) claimed last week that it’s received information alleging that NATO wants to depose Zelensky through new elections, which follows US Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellogg calling on that country to finally hold its long-delayed presidential and parliamentary ones. SVR added that the bloc will launch a large-scale information campaign to discredit Zelensky by exposing his corruption, such as the funds that he and his team supposedly stole through various means.

This isn’t the first time that SVR has claimed to have knowledge of Western plots to replace Zelensky, some of which were cited and analyzed here when assessing the veracity of the one that they reported on last August, yet nothing of the sort has come to pass thus far. That, however, doesn’t mean that their latest claims shouldn’t be taken seriously. Observers should also remember that Putin himself predicted last June that the West will make moves in the first half of 2025 to replace Zelensky.

Kellogg’s previously cited comments and Politico’s subsequent piece about how “Ukraine freaks out as US and Russia push for elections” suggest that there’s some truth to SVR’s latest claim, though it remains to be seen whether Ukraine will hold elections later this year and if Zelensky will even run in that case. Nevertheless, the argument can be made that Trump prefers to get Zelensky out of the way since he was the Biden Administration’s top foreign policy asset, plus those two don’t like each other that much.

Democratically replacing Zelensky, even if the process isn’t free and fair should the US meddle in it to ensure that he either doesn’t run or that he loses if he does, is the most “face-saving” means to that end since the West can then present it as alleged proof that Ukraine is a “real democracy”. Trump’s return to office heralds a new era in International Relations so he might want to replace liberal-globalist leaders like Zelensky with like-minded populist-nationalist ones in order to help him implement his agenda.

Zelensky is one of the most symbolic remnants of the liberal-globalist era that’s finally ending. Him remaining in power could therefore impede the new populist-nationalist era that Trump is pioneering, ergo the need to replace him with someone who’s more aligned with his worldview. While speculation abounds about who that could hypothetically be, the argument can be made that Zelensky’s former advisor Alexey Arestovich would be a prime contender due to the pragmatic policies that he’s espoused.

At any rate, everything should become clearer after Kellogg’s reported trip to Kiev in the middle of this month, which sources claim will follow his attendance at the Munich Security Conference from 14-16 February. Leaks about his discussions with Zelensky and other European leaders will likely follow. This will allow observers to get a better sense of the veracity of SVR’s latest report. If it’s lent even partial credence in an objective sense, then more people might take their next reports even more seriously.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/russias- ... ncy-claims

As though the Nazis are going to sit on their hands while this is going on...

*****

Traces of Ukrainian Nazism
February 7, 19:03

Image

Ukrainian rock paintings in liberated settlements in the Krasnoarmeysk direction.

In the liberated settlements, not only the consequences of the atrocities and war crimes of the Ukrainian Nazis are constantly being discovered, but also traces of their ideology.

Image

Image

Image

The war in Ukraine is also a war against Ukrainian Nazism, which must be destroyed.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9657731.html

On the attack on Ulanok

Image

Based on the results of the enemy attack on Ulanok on February 6.

1. In fact, the situation with the attack on Khutor Berdin was repeated - a quick dash forward on armored vehicles for several kilometers, landing of infantry in the forests, loss of armored vehicles during the dash and during the retreat, finishing off the landed infantry, left without support.
2. For attack aircraft without further support, this turns out to be a one-way road. Just like during the attack on Khutor Berdin, now the infantry hiding in the forests in the area of ​​Cherkasskaya Kanopelka is being finished off.
3. The enemy could try to undertake new attacks to support its infantry, but having lost a large amount of equipment in one, the attacks actually cease, and the survivors are abandoned to their fate.
4. As a result, after the attack of armored vehicles on February 6, on the 7-8th the RF Armed Forces continue to methodically clear the forests of surviving Ukrainian Armed Forces.
Of course, such attacks cannot lead to any changes in the operational-tactical situation.
5. In total, the enemy lost up to 30 units of various armored vehicles + 10-12 cars in this area in 3 days from February 6 to 8, without achieving any significant results. The story with the Berdin farm in January was completely repeated.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9659019.html

The problem of sorting the wounded
February 8, 13:11

Image

The problem of sorting the wounded

Weekly author's column;
Head of the Tactical Medicine Courses project, call sign "Latish" ( https://t.me/tacticalmedicinecourses )
Especially for the Colonelcassad channel ( https://t.me/boris_rozhin )

Errors in triage of casualties in the civilian sphere and in the special military operation (SMO) zone are one of the key problems affecting the effectiveness of medical care. Triage is the process of distributing casualties into categories based on the severity of their condition and the urgency of care. In conditions of mass influx of wounded, whether as a result of man-made disasters, natural disasters or military action, errors in triage can lead to significant human losses, even if sufficient resources are available to provide care.

In the civilian sphere, errors in triage are often associated with insufficient training of medical personnel, the absence of clear protocols or their failure to comply with them. For example, during the 2010 Haiti earthquake, many seriously injured victims did not receive timely care due to chaotic medical evacuation arrangements and a lack of prioritization. Similar problems have been observed in other major disasters, such as the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, where inadequate preparation by local medical services delayed care for thousands of people.

In a special military operation zone, triage errors are compounded by challenging conditions: the constant threat to the lives of medical personnel, limited resources, the mass influx of casualties, and the need for rapid decision-making. For example, in armed conflicts in the Middle East, such as the Syrian civil war, medical services were often overwhelmed by the large number of casualties, leading to prioritization errors. Studies in active war zones have found that up to 20% of casualties who might have survived with timely care died due to poor triage.

Statistics from various conflicts show that triage errors have similar roots, regardless of the geographic region or type of conflict. For example, during the war in Afghanistan (2001–21), US military medics noted that up to 15% of wounded received care with a delay due to incorrect assessment of their condition. During the conflict in eastern Ukraine (2014–22), there were also cases of seriously wounded victims not receiving timely care due to the lack of a clear triage system on the front lines.

One of the key reasons for errors is the lack of training of medical personnel to work in extreme conditions. In the civilian sphere, this may be due to the rare use of triage skills in everyday practice, and in the SVO zone - to the lack of experience in working in conditions of mass influx of the wounded.

Another problem is the lack of uniform triage standards. Different countries and even different regions of the same country may use different prioritization systems, which complicates the coordination of efforts to provide assistance in major disasters or conflicts. For example, in Europe, the START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) system is widely used, while in some countries in Asia and Africa, less standardized approaches are used.

In conclusion, it is worth noting that errors in triage of victims are not only a medical but also a humanitarian problem. They lead to an increase in the number of victims, which is especially tragic in conditions when many lives could have been saved. Eliminating these errors requires a comprehensive approach, including both technical and organizational measures, as well as international cooperation in the field of disaster medicine and military medicine.

(c) "Latysh"

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9658765.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sun Feb 09, 2025 1:27 pm

Let's make a deal
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 09/02/2025

Image

Next week is seen as a key one in the implementation of Donald Trump's still unknown plan to end the war in Europe, a part of the world that is not a priority on his foreign policy agenda and where there is no country or bloc of countries capable of seriously challenging US hegemony in the region. These conditions do not exist, or are less certain, in the other two geographic areas on which Trumpism will focus its efforts in the next four years, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. In the first, China's size and economic power make the Asian giant the only real potential opponent that currently exists in economic, political and even geopolitical terms, if China's intentions were really to act as an opposition to the United States in a world moving towards a return to bipolarity. In Latin America, no country has the capacity to oppose Washington, as seen with Gustavo Petro's brief attempt at resistance, but US interventionism and exploitation of the continent have made it increasingly natural for these countries to approach China, including those that, like Milei's Argentina, promised not to do so.

In Europe, circumstances make it impossible for the United States to fear for its regional hegemony. This is helped by the existence of NATO, an alliance in which Washington sets the course without generally existing dissent, the even more pro-American turn of the European Union with its expansion into the eastern countries, the lack of will to decouple the economy from the American one and the need to protect its dwindling domestic industry from the more affordable equivalent products from China (especially electric vehicles). Europe has also lost interest for the United States due to the absence of a political and ideological rival that did exist in the Cold War, when Washington saw the need to control allies and rivals. The tacit agreement implied that it would be the United States that would take charge of the security umbrella, so that the European countries would have the funds to build the welfare state that was to rival the Soviet Union and contain the advance of communism. Without an alternative model and no real threat to the existence of Western institutions from Russia, the US presence in Europe is seen by Trumpism as redundant and unnecessary. In the 1990s, European countries once again mortgaged their geopolitical and security position with their refusal to create a continental security architecture that included Russia, then at its weakest point in a century. The expansion of the EU to introduce into its institutions – and give power far beyond its demographic weight – to countries whose main national ideology is hatred of Russia made any continental understanding impossible long before the Ukraine war, which has made a European alternative to subordination to the United States even more unviable.

Weakened by the decline in its demographic, economic and industrial weight, and also by the political decision to link its future to that of the United States, the European Union now finds itself with a hostile ally capable of getting what it wants by using force and which does not stop to think about the feelings and interests of those it sees as client states. Donald Trump can thus allow himself to take the reins of the negotiations to end the Ukrainian conflict without having to ask the opinion of Ursula von der Leyen, Kaja Kallas, Emmanuel Macron, Olaf Scholz or Friedrich Metz, his foreseeable successor. The president of the United States can also decide the terms on which diplomacy will be conducted and raise the points of the ceasefire or armistice agreement to later leave the management of the foreseeably unstable post-conflict phase in the hands of the European countries. Beyond the Kellogg-Fleitz proposal, which will probably be launched in the next few days, this seems to be Donald Trump's real plan: to force the parties to negotiate within limits set by Washington and force European countries to bear the consequences.

For yet another time, the US President has falsely insisted that US funding outweighs that of European countries, which, being directly in the region in question, should be responsible for security and funding Ukraine. The need not to offend the leader of the free world even if he is threatening the territorial integrity of one of the member states and using false data to justify demanding more funding from those who believe themselves to be his allies makes a European response to the blatant US manipulation of the facts impossible.

The European reaction to the idea of ​​the United States getting a deal to exploit Ukraine’s rare earths and other mineral resources has been equally timid. In his final weeks before he hopelessly loses the next election, Olaf Scholz has been one of the few European leaders to criticise Trump’s demand. It is a difficult task given the attitude and words of Volodymyr Zelensky, whose Victory Plan was largely aimed at offering the United States economic and military arguments to maintain interest in Ukraine and who in recent weeks has been extremely arrogant in reproaching European countries for not having done enough for Kiev during the war years. It is irrelevant for the Ukrainian president to recall the years of the Minsk process, during which only thanks to Franco-German support could he allow himself to blatantly breach the signed agreements, or to note that it is the European Union that makes it possible to sustain the state, pay salaries and pensions and provide for the lives of millions of refugees who have fled the war. Despite insisting, in an almost rhetorical way, that there must be a European presence in the negotiations - Kiev hopes to compensate for the imbalance of forces on the front with the presence of its allies - Zelensky has been aware for many months that Ukraine's destiny is being written in the United States and that it is Donald Trump who he must win over.

In addition to the offer of troops so that the United States can withdraw part of its contingents in Europe and dedicate them to Asia-Pacific, there is the economic point of the Victory Plan , sharing the country's wealth, which, as expected, is the only one that has caught Donald Trump's attention. "If we are talking about a deal, let's make a deal, we are ready," Zelensky said in his last interview with the Reuters agency , which, although he did not quote his words, went on to specify that "Ukraine needs security guarantees from its allies as part of any resolution." The deal Zelensky is referring to is not with Russia, to whom he hopes to present a document whose terms he must accept without the possibility of negotiation, but with his allies, specifically the United States.

To this end, Zelensky has already insisted that he is willing to “share” the country’s mineral wealth with the United States, an argument that has already become part of the country’s official discourse and is repeated by ambassadors to the press of the country in which they are posted. “It is very important to have a reliable and powerful partner that can invest and guarantee the security of these mineral resources, because a certain part of the wealth is still in the temporarily occupied territories,” said Serhii Pohoreltsev, Ukraine’s ambassador to Spain, this week, who seems to see Trump’s economic interest in the country’s lands and minerals as a way of involving the United States in continuing the war until final victory.

“Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky examined a classified map of vast deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals during an interview with Reuters on Friday, part of a push to appeal to Donald Trump’s penchant for a deal,” writes Reuters after Donald Trump has again insisted on using these resources as collateral and payment for services rendered. The contradiction between what Ukraine hopes to buy with the offer to “share” its natural resources seems obvious. Yet Zelensky insists on favoring the deal and doing so in completely Trumpian terms. “The Americans are the ones who have helped the most, so the Americans are the ones who should gain the most. They should have priority and they will. I also want to discuss this with President Trump,” Zelensky said, adhering to the falsehood that it is the United States and not the European Union that contributes the most to the Ukrainian cause. “It’s not about tens of billions, it’s about trillions,” he boasted, looking at the map – the veracity of which needs to be verified – in front of Reuters reporters . “There is energy here, there is manganese here, there is titanium here, there is iron here. That’s why we tell the United States that we should make money together. We will be happy to make money with those who protect this,” he insisted, offering the country for foreign plunder in exchange for military assistance. According to Ukraine, Trump’s demand to get hold of Ukrainian natural resources “is in the common interest.”

An important part of how the process towards some kind of negotiation will unfold will be decided next week. That will be when Donald Trump meets with Volodymyr Zelensky and “maybe” has a phone conversation with Vladimir Putin, the same week that Keith Kellogg will visit the Munich Security Conference and possibly Kiev and that Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth will participate for the first time in the Contact Group to assist Ukraine. For the moment, everything indicates that Kellogg wants a prior ceasefire before giving way to negotiations, a way of gaining time to protect Ukraine from the current Russian advance and to put pressure on Russia through sanctions. All the conflict resolution scenarios currently being handled assume that the de facto borders will not differ too much from the current front, so the meeting between the two presidents may begin to give a glimpse of Trump’s plan for the only issue still to be negotiated, the security guarantees to be offered to Kiev. In this regard, too, the only actor with decision-making capacity is the United States.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/09/hagamos-un-trato/

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
🎖🎖🎖 The Russian Ministry of Defense on the progress of repelling the attempted invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces into the territory of the Russian Federation in the Kursk Region (as of February 9, 2025)

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to defeat the formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk Region.

— During offensive actions, units of the North group of forces inflicted defeat on the formations of a tank , heavy mechanized , four mechanized , two airborne assault brigades , a marine brigade and three territorial defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of the populated areas of Bogdanovka, Gogolevka, Goncharovka, Zaoleshenka, Ivashkovsky, Kolmakov, 1st Knyazhiy, 2nd Knyazhiy, Lebedevka, Martynovka, Mirny, Nikolsky, Rubanshchina, Sverdlikovo, Sudzha and Yuzhny. Three enemy counterattacks were repelled.

— Strikes by operational-tactical, army aviation and artillery fire hit enemy manpower and equipment in the areas of the populated areas of Viktorovka, Guevo, Zamostye, Kazachya Loknya, 1st Knyazhiy, Kositsa, Kruglenkoye, Kurilovka, Loknya, Malaya Loknya, Makhnovka, Melovoy, Oleshnya, Rubanshchina, Cherkasskoye Porechnoye, as well as Basovka, Belovody, Veselovka, Zhuravka, Mirlogi, Pisarevka, Yunakovka and Yablonovka in the Sumy region.

— Over the past 24 hours, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have lost more than 320 servicemen, five tanks and five infantry fighting vehicles have been destroyed, including: one US-made Bradley IFV, three armored personnel carriers, 16 armored combat vehicles, 26 vehicles, four artillery pieces, two mortars, an Israeli-made RADA airspace control radar, as well as a UAV control center and two ammunition depots.

— In total , during the fighting in the Kursk direction, the enemy lost more than 58,870 servicemen, 355 tanks, 259 infantry fighting vehicles, 204 armored personnel carriers, 1,826 armored combat vehicles, 1,890 vehicles, 422 artillery pieces, 48 ​​multiple launch rocket system launchers, including 13 HIMARS and six MLRS made in the US, 18 anti-aircraft missile system launchers, eight transport and loading vehicles, 106electronic warfare stations, 15 counter-battery radars, six air defense radars, 38 units of engineering and other equipment, including 18 engineering vehicles, one UR-77 mine clearing unit, a bridge layer, as well as nine armored repair and recovery vehicles and a command and staff vehicle.

The operation to destroy the Ukrainian Armed Forces formations continues.

***

Colonelcassad
The Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of 9 February 2025)

Russian air defence systems shot down a HIMARS multiple launch rocket and 90 aircraft-type drones of the Ukrainian Armed Forces;

— The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 580 servicemen and four combat armoured vehicles in the area of ​​the Center group of forces per day;

— The Russian Armed Forces hit a gas and oil industry facility that supported the operation of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex, the infrastructure of military airfields in 147 districts;

— The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 205 servicemen, a tank and six combat armoured vehicles per day in the area of ​​responsibility of the West group of forces;

— The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost a tank, a combat armoured vehicle and more than 140 servicemen per day in the area of ​​the East grouping;

— The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 95 servicemen, two ammunition depots and three electronic warfare stations as a result of the actions of the North and Dnepr groups.

▫️Units of the "East" group of forces improved the situation along the forward edge. They defeated the manpower and equipment of three mechanized, tank brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and three territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Novosyolka, Burlatskoye, Novopol, Novoocheretovatoye of the Donetsk People's Republic and Gulyaipole of the Zaporizhia region.

The enemy's losses amounted to over 140 servicemen, a tank , a combat armored vehicle, five cars and three field artillery guns, including a 155-mm self-propelled artillery unit "Panzerhaubitze 2000" made in Germany.

▫️Units of the Dnepr group of forces defeated the manpower and equipment of three mechanized , infantry , two coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and two territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Novoandriyevka, Malye Shcherbaki, Kamenskoye, Stepnogorsk in the Zaporizhia region, Berislav and Otradokamenka in the Kherson region.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 65 servicemen, an infantry fighting vehicle and seven cars. Two ammunition depots and three electronic warfare stations were destroyed.

▫️ Operational-tactical aviation, strike unmanned aerial vehicles, missile forces and artillery of the Russian Armed Forces groups inflicted damage on a gas and oil industry facility that supported the operation of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine, the infrastructure of military airfields, as well as concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment in 147 districts.

▫️ Air defense systems shot down a US-made HIMARS multiple launch rocket system and 90 aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️ In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following have been destroyed: 653 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 42,800 unmanned aerial vehicles, 592 anti-aircraft missile systems, 21,268 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,514 multiple launch rocket systems, 21,463 field artillery pieces and mortars, and 31,420 units of special military vehicles.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*****

Ukraine Inches Closer to Final Call-Up
Simplicius
Feb 07, 2025

Zelensky has inched closer toward the final logical conclusion of Ukraine’s mobilization journey and demographic acid test in one. In a new interview with Reuters, the doomed leader announced that an attractive new ‘contract’ for the 18-24 cohort is being designed by Ukrainian authorities:

Image
https://archive.ph/NpgMi

"Combat brigades, experienced ones, together with the Ministry of Defense... are working on a contract option for young people from 18 to 24 years old... There will be a special agreement, there will be many preferences... there will be very high financial support," Zelensky said.

This is part of the recent initiative from Zelensky to tiptoe gradually toward full-on mobilization of the final youth contingent by first heavily incentivizing them, as well as tightening the yoke little by little with various provisions and constraints that remove exemption categories one at a time.

I’ve posted various videos in the past showing that a kind of ‘stealth’ mobilization of 18+ is already underway, like this one from Rada MP Dmitry Razumkov. Depending what the true scale of the stealth mobilization is, it could mean that Ukraine will face real trouble if it ever really does ‘officially’ announce an 18+ mobilization, because those reserves would have already been drained in advance.

In some ways, both Putin and Zelensky are playing the same game—Putin has refused to do another ‘official’ mass call-up, relying on various forms of ‘lowkey’ mobilization options, from prisoner labor, to volunteers and mercenaries, partly in order to keep society from souring on the war. Now Zelensky does the same, but is in far more dire straits.

In a new interview he remarked that he can’t even imagine how Ukraine will fight the war should the US cease its support:(Video at link.)

Interestingly he mentions that US support has stayed the same but ‘no new packages’ have been announced under Trump’s administration. Experts have weighed in that this continuing line of armaments is from the Biden admin’s orders via the Pentagon’s direct support program, but nothing has come down from the White House via the president’s own drawdown authorities or other direct special aid instruments.

In fact, Trump has doubled down on his idea that any future support would have to be strictly negotiated in exchange for Ukraine’s resources, as seen in this new video from today. Watch the second half, where I spliced in Zelensky’s new comments as well, which are quite elucidating:(Video at link.)

Isn’t it ironic that Zelensky shows a map of Ukrainian mineral wealth, suggesting that Russia is the enemy because they want Ukraine for its natural resources—yet it’s his very own primary ‘ally’ who just openly described Ukraine as nothing more than a transactional business opportunity for natural resources. The US is literally what Zelensky believes Russia to be, yet the hypocritical mask must be upheld to unjustly cast Russia as the bad guy.

By the way, in the Reuters interview Zelensky admitted that 50% of those prized rare earths Trump’s been salivating over are already under Russian control:

Image
https://archive.ph/yP5TI

As one can see, the vast majority of the remaining resources will come under Russian control sometime in the not-too-distant future:

Image



Now Ukraine has launched a new localized offensive in Kursk which has retaken the small settlement of Cherkasskaya Konopelka, just south of Sudzha:

Image

The enemy's forces have been accumulating in the Sumy region for several days. The reserves were attacked, including by the Iskander OTRK, many saw the video yesterday, it was posted on Telegram channels. The enemy attacked today in Kursk region, hoping for bad weather, last time he attacked during "clear skies". In total, the enemy threw up to 30 units of equipment into the next offensive, now they are knocking it out and this offensive for the khokhol will end the same way as the previous ones, that is, with defeat and heavy losses.

👉Vysokygovorit


The purpose is to give some breathing room to Sudzha, which Russian forces have been putting the squeeze on in recent weeks. The offensive reportedly saw several battalions worth of troops and an estimated ~30-50 vehicles already claimed destroyed in another turkey shoot. The Ukrainian side on the other hand claims Russian forces suffered heavy casualties as well. In this case, the Russians held the propaganda upper hand with dozens of videos of destroyed Ukrainian gear and men flooding out, including a lot of ‘rare’ items—now destroyed—like Challenger tanks, Bergepanzers, Wisent-1s and IMR-2s, which led to analysts opining that the AFU was scraping the bottom of the barrel for heavy weapons to use.

A little mood-setter:

Image


Meanwhile the DailyMail published another ‘leaked’ Trump ‘peace plan’:

Image
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -NATO.html

As per usual, it has zero chance to be accepted by Putin, even if it’s real.

The only real question at this point, as the Duran folks just asked in their latest program, is whether Trump will ‘escalate’ or walk away. In a new interview with NYT, Keith Kellogg reportedly said that Russia’s current sanctions ‘pain level’ is at about a 3 out of 10, and that Trump has much more room to raise that ‘pain level’ by putting sanctions pressure on Russian oil and gas.

Sanctions enforcement on Russia are “only about a 3” on a scale of 1 to 10 on how painful the economic pressure can be, Kellogg said. The US sanctions themselves — such as those targeting Russia’s lucrative energy sector — are nominally twice as high, but there is still room to ratchet them up.

“You could really increase the sanctions — especially the latest sanctions [targeting oil production and exports,]” he said. “It’s opened the aperture way high to do something.


If this is the only bolt left in Trump’s quiver to ‘hurt’ Russia, then I’m afraid the US stands little chance of persuading Putin. Most of the West and Ukraine’s actions against Russian energy industries ironically end up only helping Russia by raising oil prices, which drowns Russia in record profits; e.g. Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian oil refineries. But with the Munich conference coming up, Kellogg promises we’ll soon learn more details of Trump’s actual ‘peace plan’ in the near future.

One wonders if the Trump administration will continue the tradition of sparing the one special governor in upcoming sanctions packages:

Image
https://semnasem.org/news/2023/03/01/th ... tions-list

Kellogg did, however, demonstrate a farthing of common sense in the interview:

“For Russia, this is kind of in their DNA in military operations — basically, you’re in an attrition fight,” he said. “If you look at history, you’d never want to get into an attrition fight with the Russians, because that’s how they fight. They’re used to it. I mean, this is a country that was willing to lose — and did — 700,000 in the Battle of Stalingrad in six months, and they didn’t blink an eye.”

“And so the pressure just can’t be military. You have to put economic pressure, you have to put diplomatic pressure, some type of military pressures and levers that you’re going to use underneath those to make sure [this goes] where we want it to go,” he explained.


Let’s be honest: ultimately, the only option left for the US that could even remotely affect the inexorable Russian advance is for Trump to announce a major, direct military intervention in Ukraine. For obvious reasons, I don’t think it will come to that, though Trump could attempt to pull some trump card by threatening a kind of reverse Pristina Airport gambit to land troops somewhere on the other side of an imagined ‘DMZ’. But without a gargantuan logistics tail in the west of the country, it would simply never be convincing to anyone, not least of which the Russian general staff. To even remotely threaten Russian forces you’d need not only a vast amount of deployable manpower but the ability to sustain them over credible periods of high intensity exchanges.

But as I said, even though it’s not likely, it’s the only thing Trump could possibly do to thwart Russia. No amount of sanctions could possibly stop the Russian forward march, nor a limp wet-napkin European response featuring some kind of light ‘rapid deployment force’ on the other side of the river. As such, Trump is left with only digging a deeper hole for himself, as the longer he waits to extricate himself from this conflict the more painful it will be for his legacy.

The Duran team made a good point in mentioning that Trump has a rare golden opportunity—albeit a short window, at that—to pull the plug on US involvement with this war amidst the deafening turmoil of the USAID scandal and the avalanche of related upheavals. He momentarily has the democrats dazed and in total disarray, with the CIA and other major subversive-foreign-enemy agencies in the process of some paralyzed convulsions that would allow Trump to act as desired. The longer he waits, the more he allows the smoke to clear and his opponents to gather their footing, organizing back into coherent formation against his most impactful policies.

Of course, one could argue the opposite side, that Trump cannot just yet dump Ukraine because he hasn’t drained the swamp enough to protect himself, or get rid of the embedded deep state neocons who would put up credible roadblocks. As such, he may be biding his time to continue flushing out these deep state limpets first, before really bringing the hammer down. For instance:

Image

With the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House, Washington is rapidly reviewing its policy on Ukraine. All Pentagon employees have already been dismissed and removed and the USAID responsible for this track has been liquidated, and Trump himself made it clear: the previous level of financial and military support for Kiev should not be expected.

As for the ‘leaked plans’, Julian Roepcke per usual didn’t take kindly to them:

Image

In fact, Julian has been asking some very ‘uncomfortable’ questions of late, here tongue lashing a pro-UA ‘analyst’ who was confabulating ‘major’ Russian losses on the front:

Image

Roepcke appears mostly correct here—100-200 total daily casualties is about 50-100 KIA, which accords much closer to reality than common Western numbers; as can be seen, even the stalwarts are slowly coming around after three years of being drubbed by increasingly warped propaganda from their own side.

A Ukrainian politician recently had the same ‘awakening’:

Anna Konstantinovna Skorokhod, a Ukrainian politician, said that the Russians would have ceased to exist long ago if they were to believe the official figures, where for every dead Ukrainian there are 10 dead Russians and for every wounded, there are 17 wounded Russians.

I advise Zelenskyy to stop listening to idiots and demand reliable data.


(Video at link.)

And a last important video on this count—a Ukrainian officer describes how only 10% of Ukrainian KIA are ever removed from the field:(Video at link.)

Think about it—it lines up with a lot of Ukrainian “official figures”, even Zelensky’s so called 40,000 dead: those are the officially retrieved and identified dead, while the real amount could be 400k or more, as per the above.



To get back to the Kellogg interview at the start as a fitting capstone, allow me to quote one last thing he said:

“Very frankly, both sides in any negotiation have to give; that’s just the way it is in negotiations,” he said. “And that’s where you have to find out, ‘OK, where is this at? What’s acceptable?'”

“Is it gonna be agreeable to everybody? No. Is it gonna be acceptable to everybody? No. But you try to run this balance,” he added.

This perfectly encapsulates the totally clueless nature of the Trump team, which is merely fumbling around in a theatrical ‘show’ of global leadership that is nothing more than bad Kabuki theater. Why would Russia have to adhere to the “rules of negotiations” as if it’s some kind of board game? Russia is winning, Ukraine is running out of men—there really isn’t much more to it than that. Russia doesn’t have to “give” anything at all, and if Kellogg really believes so he’s as flaky as his breakfast namesake.

This is really amateur hour, with an old, decaying Hegemon desperately trying to show a shell-shocked, polycrisis-ridden world that it’s still “got the goods”, and can push people around without having to actually make a real effort at solving complex problems, instead resorting to throwing up a front of inane and nonsensical ‘logic’ like a drunk ex-champ winging air punches to impress a few booze-hunched barflies.

Guess they’ll have to learn the hard way that draining a few beltway NGOs does not undo decades of terminal atrophy, nor give a reality TV star and casino tycoon military primacy over the pedigreed war council of a great power.

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/ukr ... final-call

******

Putin’s Opposition To Blaming Today’s Germans For Their Ancestors’ Crimes Is Pragmatic
Andrew Korybko
Feb 08, 2025

Image

Nothing that he ever says is by chance or due to him losing control of his emotions.

Putin surprised some observers by recently expressing his opposition to blaming today’s Germans for their ancestors’ crimes. According to him, “Today’s German society has nothing to do with it. Indeed, the historical memory exists, it is important to remember it, one cannot forget about it, but I don’t think that it is fair to put blame for what happened in the 1930s and the 1940s on today’s generation of Germans.” This is a pragmatic position for the three reasons that’ll now be explained.

For starters, an estimated 26 million Soviets were killed by the Germans during World War II, whether directly or through indirect means such as starvation and disease caused by their invasion of the USSR. It would therefore be understandable if Putin, who leads the Soviet Union’s successor state, might still hold a grudge against that ethno-national group. He doesn’t, however, and this is meant to set a positive example as regards the grudges that other ethno-national groups hold against Russia.

Segueing into the second reason, most Central & Eastern European peoples have a negative view towards at least part of their respective histories with Russia, whether during the Imperial and/or Soviet periods. The Baltic States and Poland are infamous for this. Accordingly, by showing that he holds no grudge against today’s Germans for the crimes that their Nazi ancestors committed against his people, Putin wants to encourage comparatively moderate Balts, Poles, and others to follow suit vis-a-vis Russia.

And finally, Putin likely expects that Germany’s CDU will win this month’s early elections, after which they might adopt some of the populist-nationalist AfD’s policies, including towards Russia. The AfD’s co-leader wants to restore Russian gas imports through the one undamaged Nord Stream pipeline, while the Financial Times recently reported that other unnamed German officials are considering the same as part of a Ukraine peace deal. Putin therefore understandably wants to get on Germans’ good side.

This was a bold move considering that Elon Musk was criticized by the ADL for saying pretty much the same thing during his video appearance at an AfD event late last month. Nevertheless, Putin is a proud lifelong philo-Semite whose track record of fighting anti-Semitism and maximally ensuring remembrance of the Holocaust was touched upon here in late December, which debunks politicized accusations of him supposedly hating Jews. He thus felt confident enough to say almost exactly what Musk just did.

Putin is the consummate pragmatist who always very carefully chooses every word that he uses. Nothing that he ever says is by chance or due to him losing control of his emotions. It’s no different with what he just said about how today’s Germans shouldn’t be blamed for the crimes of their ancestors. This pragmatic position is meant to most immediately advance Russia’s soft power interests in Central & Eastern Europe while possibly furthering its economic-political ones after the next German elections.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/putins-o ... ing-todays

After Ukraine is de-Nazified Russia should insist that Germany do also. Individuals and parties who carry water for dead Nazis should be persecuted.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Mon Feb 10, 2025 1:04 pm

Why do they have to take him away like a dog?
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 10/02/2025

Image

“They form a small crowd at the large metal fence, tense and waiting in the dark. Most of them seem overwhelmed, both by stress and by the crammed plastic bags, all of them for men who will soon be off to war,” writes The New York Times in the opening of a report on families trying to say goodbye to men who, in many cases conscripted against their will, are to be immediately sent to the front. “Where is my daddy, where is my daddy?” cries a two-year-old boy, clutching the hand of his tearful grandmother, whose father “had been picked up by recruiting officers that morning on his way to work. He was able to send a message to his mother: he had been taken to this military assembly point outside Kiev along with dozens of other men picked up that day around the Ukrainian capital. Taken for processing, they would be held overnight and sent in the morning for basic military training as recruits.” His family wonders, "Why do they have to take him away like a dog?"

Until a few months ago, polls published both in Ukraine and in the West showed the same trend, which, although contradictory, clearly represented the reality of the country. On the one hand, the majority of the population believed that it was necessary to continue fighting. The fundamental difference was how long. One part of the population advocated continuing with the military route until the borders existing before the Russian invasion were recovered, while a smaller part believed that they wanted to fight up to the 1991 borders, a remote option that not even the Pentagon's advisers have ever believed in. On the other hand, despite understanding that the military route was the appropriate solution and despite the difficulties that Ukraine was having in maintaining its territory, and even more so in recovering some of what it had lost, fewer and fewer people saw themselves as soldiers in the trenches of this war that they continued to defend. However, the position of fighting until final victory has been reduced in the last year to become a minority, widely surpassed by those who want a short-term negotiation to stop the war. This process has occurred in parallel with the slow, tedious but constant Russian advance in Donbass and has not been slowed down by the adrenaline of the Kursk invasion. To this change in the feeling about the chances of victory we must add the increasingly public resistance to recruitment, so evident that not even the Western media, willing to hide negative aspects of the Ukrainian government's management, are hiding it any longer.

“At the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, men flocked to recruiting centers. But after three years of war, the pool of volunteers has dried up. Now, men wait for their draft papers to arrive to report to recruiting centers or try to avoid being found,” The New York Times admits . The outlet forgets to mention that attempts to flee across the border or to confine men to their homes to avoid being captured by gangs that forcibly recruit on the streets, in supermarkets, gyms or workplaces have increased in recent months, but are not new. The ban on men of military age leaving the country allows Ukraine to immediately detain and recruit those who try to flee and are detected with false papers or crossing the border illegally, but it has not prevented such attempts from continuing to occur.

In 2024, Ukraine finally passed the new mobilization law, which was intended to recruit hundreds of thousands of men to replace losses and expand the contingent on the frontline territory. Unlike in 2022, when circumstances favoured Kiev, which had thousands of volunteers who enlisted in the wave of patriotism and nationalism in the months following the Russian invasion and which faced an excessively small Russian group, the passage of time has reversed this situation. It is clear that a part of the young population fled the partial mobilization decreed by Vladimir Putin in September 2022, but it has also been noted that the measures with which Russia has encouraged voluntary enlistment - mainly by providing financial facilities, exemption from mortgage payments, educational facilities and higher salaries than in middle-class professions - have worked. For some time now, the lack of troops has not been a problem for Russia, but for Ukraine, which had to withdraw from the legislative reform the will to demobilize those who had been fighting for years. Kiev continues to claim to have suffered significantly lower casualties than Russia, although no one can believe the figure of 45,000 Ukrainian soldiers killed in the war given this week by Zelensky, and boasts of the data on criminal cases for desertion in the Russian Federation, although it prefers not to comment on its own figures. “In Ukraine, since the beginning of the Russian invasion in 2022, more than 80 thousand cases of desertion have been registered,” said MP Ruslan Gobenko, as quoted by the Ukrainian daily Strana last September. According to the MP, the figure is far from being the real one, since the commanders themselves try not to report desertions in order to disguise the data, most likely on orders from their superiors. The appearance of efficiency, unity and strength is important as an image of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in order to maintain the firm support of allies. The mobilization of resources required for a war of the current intensity is only possible if the suppliers are confident that their proxy will be able to meet the minimum objectives. The perception of an army that hides its desertions, denies its casualties and from which the population hides in order not to be captured and sent to the front would be a disaster for Ukraine.

“Out of every 100 people mobilized last fall, 10-20 are still standing, the rest are dead, wounded or incapacitated,” the head of the Poltava region mobilization said in September 2023, suggesting a much higher number of deaths and irrecoverable casualties than the state is giving. The continuation of the war, which despite the current rhetoric of peace remains the preference of Ukraine, which does not want to enter into negotiations in a weak position, requires constant recruitment. The mobilization law, which did not even meet the soldiers’ demand to provide a path to demobilization or the right to rest, also required the registration of all men of military age. “In 2024, more than six million citizens required to perform military service did not update their personal data. “This can lead to a fine of between 17,000 and 25,500 hryvnias,” admitted a Ukrainian newspaper in January of this year. “Since the large-scale invasion, the Recruitment Office has put more than half a million recruits on the wanted list. The National Police is looking for these citizens,” it added. When found, the men are sent to isolated places on the outskirts of cities, where they are registered and, as The New York Times shows in its report, they may receive a final visit from their relatives, who come to the appointment with small bags containing something to eat or essential personal items such as toothbrushes, underwear or a coat, before being sent to basic training and then to the front. “He is not a soldier, I don’t know how he will serve,” laments the partner of one of the soldiers mentioned by the New York newspaper in its article.

The solution to the manpower shortages, which the West has called the main burden currently facing Ukraine, is to extend the mobilization to those under 25, a step that Zelensky has tried not to take. Crossing that line would threaten an entire generation that, even before the war and the emigration of recent years, was dangerously small in demographic terms. The demand first came from Lindsey Graham, who acted as the advance guard for the offensive that was yet to come. Antony Blinken later adopted the speech, which was later repeated by Jake Sullivan and now by his successor as National Security Adviser, Mike Waltz. All of them have demanded that Ukraine show that the country is willing to continue fighting if it seeks to keep the West from continuing the flow of weapons, a warning that should not be understood as a threat to cut off supplies, but as an order from a superior.

In the face of the outright refusals of the previous months, in recent days, Zelensky has opened the door to the incorporation of this generation into the war, although through an alternative route to conscription, or perhaps through a recruitment camouflaged with incentives. The Ukrainian president plans to present the measure this week, but according to his own statement, it would involve “special contracts” for this population of men between 18 and 25 who, technically, would continue to be exempt from mobilization, but whose enlistment would be encouraged by economic concessions in the form of credit facilities for housing, free higher education or “high financial security.” In fact, this population can already enlist voluntarily, so the current measures are a confirmation of the lack of volunteers, the failure of the State to replenish its ranks and the fallacy that Zelensky has maintained for months, claiming that the problem was not one of troops, but of the quantity of weapons sent by the West and available to equip all the brigades that Ukraine claimed to have formed and that it could not use due to lack of material.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/10/por-q ... -un-perro/

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
0:38
Kursk Region, Fanaseyevka Clearing

Active combat operations continue in Kursk Region. In some areas there is a lull, in others the enemy is trying to be active, and in others our units are counterattacking.

On the line of Staraya/Novaya Sorochin, the enemy has strengthened its forward positions and also increased the number of reconnaissance and attack UAV operators in this direction in order to complicate the logistics of our troops.

In the area of ​​Russkoye/Cherkasskoye Porechnoye, Martynovka, the front line and the situation remained unchanged.

In the vicinity of Cherkasskaya Konopelka and Fanaseyevka, the enemy tried to evacuate the wounded and replenish losses in the morning. At the moment, our troops continue counterattacking activities. During

the day, the forest area south of Fanaseyevka was completely cleared. And by the evening, our soldiers were able to push the enemy out of the village. Currently, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are not in Fanaseyevka, and our troops occupy the village.

There are also successes to the east of Cherkasskaya Konopelka, where our troops are advancing through forest plantations near the dam.

@rusich_army

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*******

Ukraine’s Traumatized Troops Could Pose A Security Threat To All Of Europe
Andrew Korybko
Feb 09, 2025

Image

The EU would do well to indefinitely suspend Ukrainians’ visa-free access to the bloc after martial law ends.

Outgoing Polish President Andrzej Duda told the Financial Times that a crime wave could sweep across Europe after the Ukrainian Conflict ends if that country’s PTSD-afflicted troops spill into the bloc and engage in organized crime like their Soviet predecessors from the 1980s Afghan War did after 1991. The Ukrainian Foreign Ministry swiftly reacted by denying that they could pose any such threat, pointing to how they didn’t between 2014-2022, and claiming that they’re actually a security asset for Europe.

Their three points are superficial though since traumatized troops anywhere in the world are much more prone to deviant behavior, the latest phase of the conflict has objectively been much more traumatizing than the prior one, and this therefore makes its veterans a security liability for Europe at the very least. Compounding the aforementioned risks is the fact that the US failed to track billions of dollars’ worth of weapons sent to Ukraine according to Reuters so some of these likely ended up on the black market.

The threat that Duda just drew attention to is thus a very credible and urgent one that should be taken seriously by all European stakeholders. This doesn’t mean that they need to foot part of the bill for Ukraine’s security and development like he strongly implied in his interview, but just that they should at the minimum indefinitely suspend its citizens’ visa-free access to the bloc otherwise traumatized veterans armed with illegally obtained US weapons might turn his warning into a prophecy.

The floodgates will open if the US succeeds in brokering a ceasefire like it’s arguably aiming to do for the purpose of prompting Ukraine into lifting marital law and therefore legally setting the stage for the next elections. Military-age Ukrainian males will then be able to freely leave to the EU unless the bloc indefinitely suspends their visa-free access. The arguments in favor of these restrictions far outweigh those against them from the perspective of European and Ukrainian national interests.

Europe already received several million low-wage laborers so it doesn’t need to risk the credible security consequences of accepting traumatized Ukrainian veterans just to obtain some more, while Ukraine needs as many of its refugees to return as possible after the conflict ends in order to rebuild. It goes without saying that Ukraine also can’t afford another large-scale exodus and thus has an interest in requesting that the EU indefinitely suspends their visa-free access to the bloc if it won’t do so on its own.

Keeping the border open to them would be a recipe for mutual disaster. There’s also the possibility that Poland takes the lead in unilaterally refusing to admit military-aged Ukrainian males after their country’s martial law is lifted just like it unilaterally decided to suspend asylum rights for some migrants last year. That could trigger a legal crisis within the bloc, especially if others like Hungary and Slovakia follow suit, which would be a worst-case political scenario at the time when the EU would need unity on Ukraine.

Poland’s ruling liberal-globalists, who are closely aligned with EU-leader Germany, might not have the political will to do that though but Hungary might and it could justify this based on Duda’s warning. Even if no member state makes such a dramatic move, some of their citizens might angrily agitate for this if their compatriots fall victim to PTSD-afflicted Ukrainian veteran criminal gangs. The issue deserves to be closely monitored since it’s a credible security risk that could have outsized consequences for the bloc.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/ukraines ... oops-could

Tough luck, they ax'ed for it...

******

Conspiracy from TCK
February 9, 23:03

Image

Regarding the conspiracy from the TCC.
A teacher from the Lviv University did not tell his fortune in time, so the TCC people caught him, kidnapped him, broke his head and threw him out on the road.

Mobilization of a Lviv University teacher who was found with a fractured head near Kiev.

Image

According to blogger Vlad Kononov, the man's name is Stepan Bilchenko.
"Stepan Borisovich Bilchenko was abducted by TCC employees in Lviv, near the Stryiskyi Market, at about 9:00 am. At that time, he was heading to work at the Ivan Franko Lviv University, where he worked as a senior laboratory assistant in the nuclear physics department, conducting practical classes for students.

Image

He was taken to the Lychakiv-Zheleznodorozhny ORTCK and SP allegedly to update his credentials. However, he was forced to undergo a VLK in just two hours, without a proper medical examination! He did not even visit most of the doctors.
He was illegally detained all day, moral pressure was exerted, intimidated, and a summons was issued.
"Stepan ended up near Kiev in record time. After express mobilization and quick dispatch to Kiev, he was found on the side of the road. A passerby called an ambulance.
Doctors at the hospital diagnosed: "Cerebral edema, basal skull fracture and hematoma."


I wonder if he voted for Zelensky or Poroshenko?

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9661728.html

On negotiations on Ukraine
February 10, 15:05

Image

Trump confirmed that he had already spoken with Putin by phone, but preferred not to disclose the details of the conversation. Obviously, there is nothing to announce yet, so the contacts are taking place without unnecessary fuss. As soon as (if) they agree on something, we can expect contacts along the CIA/SVR and the State Department/Russian Foreign Ministry related to the preparation of a possible meeting between Putin and Trump in a neutral country (not in Europe).

It is also worth noting that today the Russian Foreign Ministry once again announced that the Russian Federation will only contact the legitimate authorities of Ukraine, to which Zelensky no longer belongs. Zelensky himself refuses to hold elections, because for him this is the end. This issue will have to be decided (or not decided) by the Americans.

In any case, the war will continue one way or another even during the negotiations, because Russia has repeatedly made it clear that there will be no new Minsk, during which the war continued. The hostilities will stop only after the conclusion of diplomatic agreements. Not earlier. The war itself is partially paid for by both sides until 2027, if we consider the long-term orders for the production of equipment and ammunition for the war in Ukraine in the United States, Europe and Russia. Nevertheless, in the last month, the discussion about the possibility of ending the war in the spring-summer-fall of 2025 has noticeably intensified, although in fact there are no agreements between the United States and the Russian Federation at the moment, as the White House and the Kremlin have repeatedly stated.

P.S. In the photo, a gas facility in Ukraine that was destroyed recently, which belonged to the Burisma company and was associated with Hunter Biden.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9662762.html

Anniversary trophy
February 10, 11:07

Image

Trophy with crosses in Kursk region in the year of the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9662391.html

Google Translator

*******

Ukrainian Armed Forces’ crimes in Russia’s Kursk region: Western media’s selective indifference

Lucas Leiroz

February 9, 2025

The torture and murder of civilians suggest a deliberate strategy to terrorize the local population and create chaos in Russian territories.

During the ongoing Ukraine’s war of aggression against the Russian Federation, numerous incidents involving the Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) have come to light, highlighting grave violations of human rights and international law. However, the selective attention paid by the Western media to these events presents a stark contrast to the immediate and intense reactions that followed incidents such as the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, the Bucha flase flag tragedy, or other similar cases. A close examination of two such incidents — the crimes committed in Russkoye Porechnoye and Sudzha — raises crucial questions about the integrity of Western media narratives and the apparent double standards in responding to atrocities in the context of the Ukrainian conflict.

The crimes in Russkoye Porechnoye

Located in Russia’s Kursk region, Russkoye Porechnoye was the site of horrific attacks committed by the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Reports from locals and investigators show a grim picture of the situation. As part of a Kiev regime’s brutal invasion of the border zone, at least 22 civilians, including women, were raped and killed by neo-Nazi militants and foreign mercenaries.

Furthermore, the UAF’s actions in Russkoye Porechnoye have been characterized by a disturbing lack of regard for international norms and laws, including those outlined in the Geneva Conventions. These laws prohibit the targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure during armed conflict. Yet, the torture and murder of civilians and the shelling of residential areas in Russkoye Porechnoye suggest a deliberate strategy to terrorize the local population and create chaos in territories of Russian sovereignty. Despite these serious accusations, there has been little media coverage or condemnation from Western governments, who instead focus on the unbased, alleged actions of Russian forces in areas ckaimehy Kiev.

Sudzha: A tactic of terror

Sudzha, a town in the Kursk region near the Ukrainian border, has also been targeted by Ukrainian military aggression. According to testimonies from locals and investigative journalists, Ukrainian forces have used Western rockets and heavy artillery to target civilian areas, with devastating consequences. The constant barrage of fire has left hundreds of civilians either dead or injured and forced many to flee their homes. Buildings, schools, and hospitals have been hit, with little regard for the lives and safety of non-combatants.

Like Russkoye Porechnoye, Sudzha stands as an example of how the Ukrainian Armed Forces have operated with apparent impunity, carrying out attacks on civilian infrastructure and causing widespread destruction. Yet again, these acts of aggression have not attracted the same level of attention or outrage from Western media outlets and governments. In stark contrast, Russian legitimate attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure are often depicted as deliberate war crimes, with baseless international calls for accountability and the imposition of sanctions on Moscow.

The western media double standard

The selective nature of Western media coverage is evident when comparing the events in Russkoye Porechnoye and Sudzha with high-profile incidents such as the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 or the alleged atrocities in Bucha. The tragedy of MH17, in which 298 people lost their lives after a missile strike downed the plane over eastern Ukraine in 2014, was immediately seized upon by Western governments and media as clear evidence of Russian culpability, despite an ongoing investigation into the incident.

Similarly, the Bucha false flag tragedy, which emerged in April 2022, saw Ukrainian officials and Western media quickly attributing the deaths of civilians to Russian forces, without thoroughly examining the possibility of Ukrainian forces committing such acts. While the scale and nature of the crimes in Russkoye Porechnoye and Sudzha may not be as sensationalized as these earlier events, they are no less significant in terms of the human cost of war.

The lack of coverage from Western media to these incidents involving Ukrainian forces points to a worrying trend of selective outrage. While Russia is consistently portrayed as the primary aggressor, even in instances where its forces may have acted in response to Ukrainian provocations, the UAF’s own crimes appear to be overlooked or minimized. This disparity in media coverage and political response creates a false narrative that oversimplifies the complex reality of the conflict.

The implications of ignoring Ukrainian atrocities

The failure to properly address the crimes committed by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Russkoye Porechnoye and Sudzha risks perpetuating the conflict without a genuine attempt to address the root causes of violence. By ignoring these incidents, the West not only undermines its credibility in advocating for international law but also emboldens the Ukrainian government to continue its military aggression without fear of international consequences. A true commitment to peace and justice requires an impartial assessment of all parties involved in the conflict, not a selective condemnation based on political alignment.

In fact, the lack of Western media reaction to the crimes of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in Russkoye Porechnoye and Sudzha speaks deeply about the biases that shape the narrative of the war in Ukraine. Just as the media spotlight was fixated on Russian actions in unproven incidents, the same level of scrutiny should be applied to Ukrainian actions. Until this imbalance is addressed, the international community will continue to be misled by a distorted picture of the conflict, which serves the interests of powerful political players while disregarding the rights of innocent civilians caught in the crossfire.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... ifference/

*******

The West Is Complicit.

In fact, it encouraged it. Including by means of now grossly reduced USAID.

The Ukrainian military is trying to destroy evidence of its war crimes in the settlements they have occupied in Russia’s Kursk Region, senior Russian diplomat Rodion Miroshnik has claimed. Last month, Russian investigators alleged that Kiev’s troops had raped, tortured, and murdered Russian civilians in the recently-liberated village of Russkoye Porechnoye. They published gruesome videos of bodies piled in cellars in some of the homes inside the settlement. Several captured Ukrainian servicemen acknowledged committing the crimes under interrogation, saying they had been acting on the orders of their commanders. Similar atrocities could have been committed by enemy forces in other villages in Kursk Region according to Miroshnik, who is tasked by the Russian Foreign Ministry with collecting evidence of alleged Ukrainian war crimes. He made the comments to RIA-Novosti on Saturday. “Ukraine is battering the nearby settlements, apparently trying to destroy the consequences of its other crimes,” he said.

The latest one, they tortured and then killed the veteran of the Great Patriotic War. They are Neo-Nazis. Trump calls them "beautiful young people". Looks like he called Moscow, if it did happen it didn't go well for him. Notable absence of "brotherly people" rhetoric from Russian political top, as of lately. On the other hand, many 404 transplants to Russia want this mythology to continue. Too late for them and whatever will be left of 404.

(Video at link.)

Meanwhile, piles of corpses of VSU in Kursk and elsewhere. The kill ratio is obviously now way more than 1 to 10-12, most likely somewhere around 1 to 15-18. 404 and the West wanted it, and that is why Zakharova said it straight--Paris backs nazis. No surprise here. We all know facts of the WW II. Paris was spared and who can forget French 33rd Waffen SS Division Charlemagne. This formation alone outnumbered French Resistance by a huge margin, not to mention other French volunteers serving elsewhere in Wehrmacht. I speak about this and other things today in my latest video.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/02 ... licit.html

******

Are We on the Verge of a Ceasefire and Peace Deal in Ukraine?
February 9, 2025



I post, you decide. Personally, I’ll believe all this talk about a deal to end the Ukraine war when I actually see it happen. – Natylie

Trump reveals he’s spoken with Putin by phone, says Russian president ‘wants to see people stop dying’ in Ukraine war

By Miranda Devine, New York Post, 2/8/25

President Trump has spoken to Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the phone to try to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war, he told The Post in an exclusive interview aboard Air Force One Friday.

“I’d better not say,” said Trump when asked how many times the two leaders have spoken.

But he believes Putin “does care” about the killing on the battlefield.

“He wants to see people stop dying,” said Trump.

“All those dead people. Young, young, beautiful people. They’re like your kids, two million of them – and for no reason.”

The three-year-old war “never would have happened” if he had been president in 2022, Trump asserted.

“I always had a good relationship with Putin,” he said, unlike his predecessor.

“Biden was an embarrassment to our nation. A complete embarrassment.”

Trump said he has a concrete plan to end the war.

“I hope it’s fast. Every day people are dying. This war is so bad in Ukraine. I want to end this damn thing.”

Addressing National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, who joined him in his study aboard Air Force One Friday night, the president said: “Let’s get these meetings going. They want to meet. Every day people are dying. Young handsome soldiers are being killed. Young men, like my sons. On both sides. All over the battlefield.”

Vice President Vance will meet Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky at the Munich Security Conference next week.

Trump has said he wants to strike a $500 million deal with Zelensky to access rare-earth minerals and gas in Ukraine in exchange for security guarantees in any potential peace settlement.

On Iran, Trump told The Post: “I would like a deal done with Iran on non-nuclear. I would prefer that to bombing the hell out of it. . . . They don’t want to die. Nobody wants to die.”

“If we made the deal, Israel wouldn’t bomb them.”

But he would not reveal details of any potential negotiations with Iran: “In a way, I don’t like telling you what I’m going to tell them. You know, it’s not nice.”

“I could tell what I have to tell them, and I hope they decide that they’re not going to do what they’re currently thinking of doing. And I think they’ll really be happy.”

“I’d tell them I’d make a deal.”

As for what he would offer Iran in return, he said, “I can’t say that because it’s too nasty. I won’t bomb them.”

***

The Coming Threat of Major Trade War
By Oliver Boyd-Barrett, Substack, 2/9/25

How About We Lift Sanctions
The first also relates to a story in the New York Post, a Murdoch paper that has been described as the “paper of wreckage,” that claims that President Donald Trump has told The Post that he has talked with Russian President Vladimir Putin and that the two are agreed that they will talk.

There is certainly room for doubt as to the accuracy of this story but Mercouris is inclined to believe the general thrust of it. Further, his Moscow source is telling him that there are conversations in the Duma as to the likely content of the US starting position. A fairly dramatic one, as one might expect from Donald Trump, which is that the US would remove all or almost all sanctions on Russia and allow Russia to resume pipeline gas supplies to Europe by Nord Stream, in return for a Russian ceasefire.

But, that if Russia does not agree to this, then the US will launch an all-out trade war against Russia and all countries that deal with Russia. According to Mercouris’ source, and it is the assessment of Mercouris himself, as it is mine, many Russians are disinclined to think that the Kremlin should take this seriously.

Calling the Bluff
First of all, why would they believe any promise that the US makes, given the country’s litany of failed promises in the past (Minsk, Istanbul)? Especially, why would they think Washington would be OK with a resumption of pipeline supplies when Washington has so adamantly opposed these ever since Putin and Merkel embarked on Nord Stream, and when Washington remains desperate to beef up revenues from the sale of LNG to Europe?

Second of all, an all-out trade war would force China and India, both of them heavily dependent on Russian oil and gas, to take sides between Washington and Moscow and there is nothing about either of these two countries that would lead one to expect that they are about to abandon the meta-program of the BRICS or to abandon Russia to its fate at the hands of the US (as they know that the US will be coming for them, too). They would be simply giving up to Washington their dream of a multi-polar world.

Thirdly, many Russians suspect that the US is bluffing and that Russia must call its bluff. An all-out trade war would help develop a stronger coalition of anti-US forces (which may now include former US allies such as Canada and Mexico) to combat its trade measures; it would prompt Russia to undertake a total mobilization for an economic and military war; it would greatly elevate prices of energy world-wide and on practically everything else, and this would be very damaging for US consumers and the US economy.

Fourthly, there is nothing being said by Washington at this time, that patently and in good faith picks up on the broader challenge of an agreement that would meet Russia’s legitimate security interests and addresses the issue of a European security architecture (or, as I have said several times in recent days) a global security architecture that would also address China’s legitimate security interests.

Finally, it is every day more obvious that Trump wants to get the US out of Ukraine. The US is even giving up the chair of the next NATO meeting in Ramstein, a position that is being eagerly seized by (“friends with Ukraine for 100 years) the UK in the form of its defense minister, so is unlikely to want to press very hard on any deal he is offering Russia.

<snip>

Peace Talks, Zel and Europe
The prospect of being excluded from talks, along with clear indications from Washington that it wishes to get rid of Zelenskiy, if necessary by insisting that he call national parliamentary and presidential elections before the end of 2025, appears to be behind recent extremist statements from Zelenskiy about how Ukraine can develop its own dirty nuclear bomb and his persistent demands for more Western missiles and other weapons.

Zelenskiy appears not to want to proceed just yet with a bill that has already been prepared in the RADA that would lower the age by which men can be mobilized to 18, but instead favors a measure that would boost voluntary recruitment by offering better rewards. This may be because Zelenskiy understands that the mobilization measure would be deeply unpopular, and that if it led to the deaths of very large numbers of young people, as it well might, then he would be even less likely to survive than he already is. Also Zelenskiy must wonder whether the war will last for long enough to make it worthwhile for him to start an expensive, coercive mass mobilization right now.

Europe’s weakness continues to be undermined by turbulence in Germany over the flirtation between the CDU and its leader – and likely soon to be next chancellor – Merz, and AfD, which would conceivably give AfD some element of veto power over a continuation of the war with Russia over Ukraine.

In France the government of Francois Bayrou has just passed a budget by decree – the same, virtually, that brought down the previous government. The new measure has not, as was at first expected, led to a successful vote of no confidence, since it was not supported by Melanchon’s leftist bloc (now falling apart) with whom Bayrou had previously consulted and which has no reason to think it would do very well in a likely ensuing election to replace Macron at this time, while Marine Le Pen’s National Rally also calculated that its interests would not be best met if there were to be presidential elections just yet. Another vote of confidence is anticipated very soon in relation to government immigration proposals.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/02/are ... n-ukraine/

(More at link, Iran.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Tue Feb 11, 2025 1:22 pm

Hybrid Wars in the Baltic
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 11/02/2025

Image

“Finnish authorities seized the Eagle S vessel in December in a full-throttle operation, suspecting it of sabotaging an underwater power line connecting Estonia to Finland. The detention of the ship – carrying 100,000 barrels of oil from St Petersburg – was a moment of great turmoil and appeared to be a new front in a clandestine war between Russia and the West,” writes Politico this week , referring to another of the many fronts in the covert war accompanying the war in Ukraine. In recent months, accusations of intentional sabotage have been recurrently levelled against the Russian Federation due to the breaking of submarine cables in the NATO lake , the Baltic Sea. Russian or Chinese ships with Russian crews have been detained or threatened because of such incidents, which are currently being used by European countries to justify new measures against Russia without even needing to prove Moscow’s guilt. Russia is always to blame – for any migration crisis, for the election results in Romania or Georgia, or for inflation in the world – so what matters is the Western response and not questions about who, how and why blew up Nord Stream in September 2022.

For obvious reasons, there is no sign of Moscow's hand in the attack, the most important sabotage to have occurred in the Baltic remains unsolved despite the consequences being palpable. On the one hand, without access to Russian gas thanks to the explosion and the closure of the passage through Ukraine, the price of natural gas fluctuates, sometimes endangering the industry on the continent. "The reference price of European natural gas TTF exceeds 58 euros per MWh; in terms of oil, it has reached the level of 100 dollars per barrel of oil equivalent. Absolutely destructive for the production of the energy-intensive industry," said Javier Blas, an energy expert yesterday. On the other hand, the methane leak is the main natural disaster in that area in recent years. The silence regarding this incident does not prevent the environmental issue from being one of the arguments of the European countries to seek to take new measures against Russian sabotage , which none of the EU member countries seem to question.

“The submarine cable breaks that have worried European security officials in recent months were probably due to maritime accidents rather than Russian sabotage, according to several American and European intelligence services,” headlined The Washington Post in January . Citing Western sources, the American daily, which can in no way be credited with pro-Russian sympathies, openly contradicted the European certainty that sabotage was deliberate. The sources of the article gave credence to the explanations of the captains of the detained ships, who had claimed that the unintentional breaks were due to the anchor. The Washington Post attributed these incidents to the age of the ships, part of what the West calls the Russian ghost fleet , generally very old ships bought on the market since the imposition of sanctions, to facilitate the export of Russian oil.

While the United States is sending several delegations to meet with Ukraine this week in search of negotiations to end the Russo-Ukrainian war – which would possibly mean the relaxation of sanctions against Russia – and Donald Trump seems to confirm regular contacts with the Kremlin, European countries are trying to find a way to toughen measures against Moscow. “European countries are holding behind-the-scenes talks on the large-scale seizure of Moscow’s oil-exporting tankers in the Baltic Sea, according to two EU diplomats and two government officials. In addition, they are drafting new legislation to give greater legal weight to these initiatives,” says Politico .

“Among the proposals being considered is using international law to seize ships for environmental or piracy reasons, said the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss private discussions. Failing that, countries could act on their own, jointly imposing new national laws to seize more ships on the high seas,” the outlet summarizes. The strategy appears to focus on leveraging the European Union’s sometimes selective environmental credentials and joining the modern piracy trend in which the United States seizes planes from its enemies, especially Venezuela. The goal is not symbolic, nor a way to humiliate an opponent’s leadership, but to prevent oil trade in the Baltic Sea (and, perhaps in the future, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean).

Politico mentions several possibilities of action, including seizing ships that threaten the environment and appealing to anti-piracy laws. The first would involve arrests without any crime having been committed, and the second would conflict with international law. “In the Gulf of Finland – the narrow sea where Russian cargo ships sail in the region – commercial ships retain the right of free passage under Cold War treaties. Anti-piracy laws, meanwhile, usually target ships that attack other ships, not submarine power cables, Pribyl added,” the outlet writes. However, the illegality of the proposed measures should not be an obstacle, and if international law and laws on freedom of navigation in international waters prevent it, new national legislation should be approved in strategic countries.

“About 50% of sanctioned trade goes through the Gulf of Finland,” said Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, referring to oil, citing “environmental threats” and “attacks we have suffered on our submarine infrastructure.” As usual, the Baltic countries do not need any proof of Russian sabotage to demand coercive measures against their hated enemy. “Vilnius is also starting to make efforts at a national level. According to Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė, Lithuania is considering new laws that would give authorities more power to seize ships that drop anchor, even if they are located beyond the country’s territorial waters, in its “exclusive economic zone,” Politico adds, describing the ad hoc legislation that another Baltic country is said to be preparing to make such an attempted blockade possible.

As usual, the plans are ambitious, but the possibilities are significantly limited if the EU countries cannot count on the US ally to enforce what Moscow would see as an attempted naval blockade that would possibly be understood in Russia as a declaration of war. “The new plans will not materialise easily. According to maritime experts and lawyers, the difficulties include legal retaliation from Russia, high financial costs and burdensome logistics. There will also be the labyrinthine global maritime legislation to navigate,” admits Politico . The fact that the main sources of the information are Baltic is a symbol of the fact that this is a media operation as a pressure group seeking more sanctions against Russia, either to damage the Russian economy currently, to favour Ukraine in the war or to prepare the ground for a post-war period in which they hope the political and economic confrontation will continue. While all the other actors directly involved in the Ukrainian conflict are moving towards the possibility of negotiations, the countries of the European Union, especially the most belligerent ones, those that control foreign and defence policy in the EU, are insisting on further tightening sanctions with measures that could be mistaken for acts of war.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/11/guerr ... l-baltico/

Google Translator

*****

From Cassad's telegram account:

Colonelcassad
0:47
The fighters who took part in the liberation of Dzerzhinsk (which was called Toretsk during the Ukrainian occupation and which was given its former name back after liberation) appealed to Putin with a request not to limit himself to renaming Toretsk to Dzerzhinsk, but also to return the Dzerzhinsky monument to Lubyanka.

***

Colonelcassad
Chronicle of strikes on the territory of Ukraine on February 10-11, 2025

Yesterday, during the day and at night, the Aerospace Forces and missile forces struck targets in the Donbas, in the Sumy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhia, Kherson regions (the entire spectrum of weapons), Pavlograd and Odessa (Kh-59/Kh-69), Myrgorod and Lubny in the Poltava region (Iskander-M, Kalibr), the outskirts of Vinnytsia, Cherkasy, Kiev, Chernigov, Nikolaev, Razdelnaya in the Odessa region, Uman and Kaniv in the Cherkasy region, Obukhiv and Brovary in the Kiev region (Gerani/Gerberas).

***

Colonelcassad
⚡️ Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of 11 February 2025)

Tonight, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range precision weapons of land, air and sea basing and attack unmanned aerial vehicles, as a result of which gas and energy complex facilities supporting the work of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex, military airfield infrastructure, storage sites and preparation sites for the use of attack unmanned aerial vehicles were destroyed. The strike objectives were achieved.

- In the Kharkiv direction, units of the North force grouping inflicted losses on the manpower and equipment of a tank brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a territorial defence brigade in the areas of the settlements of Velykyi Burluk and Olkhovatka in the Kharkiv region.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 20 servicemen, an armoured combat vehicle, an artillery piece and an ammunition depot.

- Units of the West force grouping improved their tactical position. Defeated the manpower and equipment of three mechanized, mountain assault, and ranger brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a territorial defense brigade in the areas of the settlements of Druzhelyubovka, Zeleny Gai, Petrovpavlivka, and Boguslavka in the Kharkiv region, Novolyubovka in the Luhansk People's Republic, and Yampolovka and Zvanovka in the Donetsk People's Republic.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 215 servicemen, two tanks, two US-made M113 armored personnel carriers, and two vehicles. Three field artillery pieces, four ammunition depots, and two electronic warfare stations were destroyed.

— Units of the "Southern" group of troops occupied more advantageous lines and positions. Defeated formations of three mechanized, mountain assault brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of the settlements of Katerynivka, Seversk, Chasov Yar, and Predtechino in the Donetsk People's Republic.

The enemy's losses amounted to 210 servicemen, two US-made HMMWV combat armored vehicles, two field artillery guns and three cars.

— The settlement of Yasenovoe of the Donetsk People's Republic was liberated by decisive actions of units of the "Center" group of forces.

Formations of four mechanized, motorized infantry, and ranger brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, a territorial defense brigade and two national guard brigades were defeated in the areas of the settlements of Belitskoye, Rodinskoye, Novosergeevka, Andreevka, Uspenovka, Dimitrov and Udachnoye of the Donetsk People's Republic.

The enemy lost up to 505 servicemen, a tank, a combat armored vehicle, four artillery pieces and seven cars.

— Units of the "East" force group continued to advance deep into the enemy's defense. They defeated the manpower and equipment of a tank, three mechanized brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a territorial defense brigade in the areas of the settlements of Bogatyr, Skudnoe, Shevchenko, Burlatskoye, Novosilka, Novopol of the Donetsk People's Republic and Hulyaipole of the Zaporizhia region.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 155 servicemen, two vehicles and six field artillery pieces, including two produced by NATO countries.

— Units of the "Dnipro" force group defeated formations of two mechanized brigades, two coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a territorial defense brigade in the areas of the settlements of Novodanilovka, Kamenskoye of the Zaporizhia region, Prydniprovskoye and Antonovka of the Kherson region.

The enemy's losses amounted to 55 servicemen, two artillery pieces and seven vehicles.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

US History of Duplicity Means Impossibility of Negotiated Settlements, Including Ukraine; Could a Government in Exile Be Coming?
Posted on February 10, 2025 by Yves Smith

In the old days of the econoblogosphere, there were regular and often intense exchanges about what the decent-sized community of finance practitioners, economists, journalists, and other experts trying to understand what was going on, since alarmingly top officials were clearly way behind the curve. That included occasional critiques of posts by individuals we more often cited, which in my case included Paul Krugman (back in the days when he was sane), Felix Salmon, and Steve Waldman. But that does not seem to happen much if at all in this era of podcasts, YouTubing, and Substackers. So I trust this post on why there will not be a negotiated settlement with in Ukraine will be taken in that spirit, that highlighting points of disagreement is essential in coming to better approximations of reality.

The very short version of the argument is that top Russian officials, most visibly Putin, have taken to regularly and in very long form describing the US and Western record of duplicity, not just with Ukraine but on other fronts. This line of commentary has only become more pointed and the bill of particulars of Western treachery, longer.

This means the Russians are clearly, repeatedly, and consistently saying any agreement with the West would be worthless. The obvious implication isn’t simply that there would be nothing to gain in signing one, but that it would be self-destructive to do so, since it would give Russia a false sense of security that the West would exploit, as it has again and again and again.

In other words, all of the focus on the content of a potential agreement misses the elephant in the room: the content is almost irrelevant. Russians cannot get to a process by which the perfidious West can be made trustworthy.

The second impediment to a deal is political time versus military time. We saw a version of this phenomenon in the financial crisis.1 Here, Trump flailing about to try to find leverage over Russia, when there is none to be had, means that he looks to be falling into the trap Steve Bannon and many others have warned about, of coming to own the Ukraine war, as opposed to dumping the mess on the Europeans.2

Finally, to address briefly the provocative headline point, your truly is NOT saying that a Ukraine government in exile (which would mainly be a Western-face-saving device) is a likely outcome. But despite Zelensky being on the ropes, the fact that he is still in office and has eviscerated domestic opposition means that he has considerable, and generally underestimated, survival skills.3 His green T-shirt act is protective coloring.

The EU is in a panic about what to do about Trump attempting to pull the rug out from under them, from demands for sudden and large increases in military funding to tariff threats to the insistence that the US will seize Greenland from Denmark, which amount to a declaration of war. Having the ferociously anti-Russia UK host a Ukraine government in exile is at best a high-profile poke in the eye, but the non-US NATO members are likely very keen to preserve a fig leaf of agency. And recall MI-6 is widely believed to be a moving force behind some of the high profile Ukraine terrorism stunts, such as the Kerch bridge truck bombing.

So in a more ambitious “government in exile” scenario, the UK (and EU) could try (stress “try”) to mount a campaign of terrorism in Russia. Such a move, were it to occur, would be exceptionally unlikely to move any needles, but the Western press would be sure to pretend otherwise.

Russia Officials Have Been Saying More and More Pointedly That the West Cannot Be Trusted…So Why Exactly Should They Bother With Negotiations?

Early in the Ukraine conflict, much of the commentary focused on battlefield action. As the Russians now obviously have the advantage, as the Western press has finally had to concede, the line-of-contact updates perversely seem to be of less interest, and so many have turned to the Trump promise to end the war, which has become a bit of an exercise in Trumpology, as in very high noise to signal.

Many of these discussions turn to the content of what a theoretical agreement could look like in light of the repeated Trump statements that he wants to end the conflict.

The wee problem with this formulation is that Trump wants not just to end the war but to be seen as ending the war. He has resorted to grasping at straws4 to pretend that he is the Big Man driving events. Sadly, this is the Trump-personalized version of the Biden fantasy:

Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
·
Follow
We’re the most powerful nation in the history of the world. We can take care of Israel and Ukraine and still maintain our overall international defense.


So we have Trump trying to pretend he has leverage over Russia, threatening to continue the war with his new pet idea of mortgaging Ukraine assets, including ones it no longer controls and ones it is set to lose control of soon, and yet more Russia sanctions.

The fact that Trump has not yet set a date for a meeting with Putin or an official call,5 and is instead (somehow) going to use the Munich Security Conference for messaging is a further admission of weakness or at best, a gross misunderstanding of the Russian position. It also may be a concession to another complication, one that Alex Vershinin pointed out in a RUSI paper, that the war against Ukraine is a coalition war. That leads to the dynamic we’ve mentioned before: the need to negotiate within Team West to decide what to do next, including what positions to advance. So if the Vance presentation is to do anything other than convey some “don’t expect more US money or free weapons” tough love, it’s more proof that Team Trump is wrestling with the war tar baby.

Trump may really believe that Russia is taking big losses and that its economy is suffering, along with his self-discrediting patter about Ukraine having lots of “rare earth”. That would equate to time being on the Collective West side. But if he actually thought that, he would not keep bringing up Ukraine and trying to act as if he is Doing Something. He could afford to a make a Big Man statement to the effect of “Russia needs to come to its senses, we can’t make them do that, Putin needs to call us” and hang back.

But let us not get caught in the trap of thinking overmuch about the Western side. To make the Russian long story very short, Putin has been admittedly playing a bit of three-card monte, which is not his normal style, in repeatedly, even floridly saying that Russia is open to negotiations. But for instance, in his massive end of year press conference, he stated that he was willing to talk without preconditions, and then immediately walked that back by reiterating what amounted to preconditions. My best guess that this is posturing for the benefit of Russia’s big economic allies. Fortunately, the US and NATO have been so unreasonable that the bar for Russia to look accommodating has been set very low.

After that, Putin ruffled some feathers in the Western media in the first in series of recent interviews with Pavel Zarubin. In the late January talk, Putin reiterated his earlier remarks that a Zelensky-imposed October 2022 ban against negotiations with Russia would need to be removed for anything to move forward. But since Zelensky was no longer the legitimate leader of Ukraine, per the Russian reading of the Ukraine constitution, he could not take this step. There was some upset that Putin was saying he could not negotiate with Zelensky. But Putin has been saying that for months, that Zelensky would need to hold a vote and be re-elected before anything he did in an official capacity could be seen as binding. As far as I could tell, the only change in Putin’s stance was making explicit what was clearly implied in longer, earlier recitations, and showing some exasperation in doing so.

The focus on this particular element of Putin’s ongoing discussions is that the Western press has chosen to ignore what comes close to Putin filibustering over time on the depth and extent of US/NATO dishonesty. He admittedly does regularly add new bits of evidence to his long-running indictment. It’s hard to think Putin is doing this for the benefit of a domestic audience. Again presumably it’s primarily aimed at Russia’s allies, nearly all of whom are still trying to stay on good terms with the US. But Putin has become more hard-edged in his critique and his stance as Russia’s battlefield position continues to improve, yet the West has yet to come to grips with that.6

For one-stop shopping on the depth of Russia’s fully-earned distrust, please read Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s remarks at an embassy roundtable discussion, The Ukraine crisis: Failed cancel culture, Moscow, February 5, 2025. Here, Lavrov extends the idea of “cancel culture,” as in attempting to extinguish the Russian state and Russian identity, to the broader notion that that the US has embarked on tearing down any pretense of hewing to laws or its own agreements. His very long bill of particulars includes how the US has suborned the UN to do its bidding, for instance, by refusing to take any bare minimum steps sought by Russia to get to the bottom of the Bucha massacre, which was one of the pretenses for breaking off the Istanbul negotiations.

A key paragraph:

But this is already a broader topic – the architecture of world order, the fate of the globalisation system which the United States built, only to then cancel it once they realised it no longer served their interests. It benefits those who agreed to work within the rules of this system – free competition, respect for property, presumption of innocence, among many others. All that was propagated has now been cancelled, because it does not serve the interests of the United States. What serves its interests today are ultimatums. We will see how this unfolds. As yet, we have not had the opportunity to observe the actions of the new American administration in practical terms.

Consider the statement by Iran’s supreme leader two days after Lavrov’s recitation. Per France24:

“You should not negotiate with such a government, it is unwise, it is not intelligent, it is not honourable to negotiate,” Khamenei said during a meeting with army commanders.

The United States had previously “ruined, violated, and tore up” a 2015 nuclear deal, he said, adding that “the same person who is in power now tore up the treaty”.

On Wednesday, Trump suggested striking a “verified nuclear peace agreement” with Iran, adding in his social media post that Tehran “cannot have a Nuclear Weapon”.


Some commentators have argued that this means that Khamenei might consider a multi-party negotiation. I find that to be an exceedingly strained reading. Khamenei has stated that the US is fundamentally untrustworthy. The JCPOA had been a multiparty deal, ratified by the five permanent members of the Security Council, plus Germany and the EU. So Iran should repeat the same failed experiment and expect a different outcome?

Khamenei in fact is saying out loud what is implicit in the extended Russian critique of US conduct. Again, Russia may feel compelled out of its desire to model best practices in the emerging multipolar world, as well as to get communications with the US out of the deep freeze (there are issues other that Ukraine, after all) so as to indulge US approaches. But official interactions, even on a contested topic, and negotiations are not the same.

I once attempted to come to an agreement with a party I did not trust. The result was a very long contract draft that would have adequately protected my interests that they rejected and took umbrage at the message it conveyed, that I thought I needed very strong legal protection.

Here, even if the US were to get past the “How do we get a government in place in Ukraine that can credibly enter into agreements?” problem, there is the matter of how the US can be trusted at all. Look at how Trump violated free trade agreements with Mexico and Canada with his 25% tariffs executive order (which remember is still in effect but has merely been paused) or his WTO-violating latest round of tariffs on China? Vance just said the Trump government might defy court orders on DOGE. This is an openly lawless US regime.

So the only thing that could conceivably succeed with Ukraine, short of Russia in the end taking the entire territory or installing a captive regime with some autonomy in whatever it decides will be rump Ukraine, would be for the agreement to include hard limits on the type and number of weapons Ukraine could possess, with Russia having what would amount to strong audit rights. That sort of scheme was part of the Istanbul deal. Recall Victoria Nuland complained about a long annex listing weapons types and proposed ceilings as being an outrage. At the point when the negotiations were scuppered, there was allegedly a big gap between the Ukraine and Russian levels.

But even in an alternative universe where talks actually got that far (as opposed to limits being imposed on a captive rump Ukraine), what about enforcement? What would happen if Russian ISR determined Ukraine was cheating? Would Russia be allowed to march in and destroy the verboten materiel? Who could be a sufficiently independent guarantor who could do that? The US would never tolerate
China in that role. Would India or Turkiye be willing to stand up and take on that potentially dangerous position?

Ukraine’s Ever-Shortening Military Time Versus Political Time

Most readers know that experts and insiders have been predicting Ukraine’s imminent demise for some time, but the very tough Ukrainians have kept defying expectations. Nevertheless, that over-predicted end game seems to be coming in sight. The Pentagon had opined a few months back that Ukraine would run out of manpower in six months, ex a mobilization of younger men. In late January, Ukrainska Pravda reported in a leak on a closed-door meeting with the Rada, that military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov, predicted “If there are no serious negotiations by the summer, then very dangerous processes for the very existence of Ukraine may begin.” Denials were slow in coming and inconsistent, suggesting Budanov himself was the leaker.

Mark Sleboda, who has been the most accurate forecaster of the trajectory of the war, had said the Russian general staff estimated that Ukraine could raise another 100,000 men for each year it dropped the mobilization age. However, yield on conscription has been plummeting. Even so, Ukraine could conceivably field another 200,000 men. That might enable Ukraine to hold out until next winter, ex Russia deciding to drop the hammer by destroying more power generation capacity.

Admittedly, Vance, who has been very opposed to the war in Ukraine, might put the US on record as committed to an exit. That would end any pretense at bargaining leverage with Russia. But recall how diehard neocon Mark Rubio is now giving at least lip service to multipolarity. Vance may be pressed by
Trump to alter his position on Ukraine. Or he may be going mainly to tell the Europeans to cough up more dough for NATO, and keep his cards to his chest about Ukraine plans. Or perhaps he will tell Zelensky privately he need to go.7 We’ll see soon enough.

The question of whether Ukraine will muster yet one more army by dropping its mobilization age to 21 or 18 and the West will scrape together enough arms to keep Ukraine on the military version of life support is still in play. Zelensky appears to be holding out for a credible arms commitment before sending younger men to slaughter. Appallingly, Trump seems to be playing along with his “weapons for Ukraine minerals” scheme.

But thinking that Ukraine can hold out as long as early 2026 seems charitable. And given the Trump team’s apparent complete misreading of Russia’s cards, they seem vanishingly unlikely to believe how Russia can and will simply proceed to roll over Ukraine and not even break all that much of a sweat in the process. And that’s before Trump’s outsized ego getting in the way. I don’t think he is constitutionally able to deal with Putin from a position of real weakness, which will result in further delay in setting up a meeting, and that eventual session resulting in Putin and Trump talking past each other.

Alexander Mercouris has held out the idea that the US could offer Russia a new European security architecture. Again, I cannot fathom that happening. First, now that the US is clearly trying to reduce NATO funding and pull back to its Americas sphere of influence, it cannot deliver the Europeans. Second, Putin may have has a variant of his old not entirely unserious ask of Russia joining NATO. Again, with the US diminishing its position in NATO by planning to lower its contributions, I can’t imagine the US entertaining this idea, even before the rabid UK, Balts and Poland nixing it. The big reason for us to keep NATO as a viable force is to help with containing China. Of course, it might help if we weren’t so keen on speeding up European de-industralization via seeking their dependence on pricey US LNG.

To put it another way: it took a full 17 years from Putin’s 2008 Munich Security Conference speech, where he called for a multipolar world order, for the US to officially acknowledge, via Mark Rubio, that the US unipolar period was unnatural and had ended. It will likely take as long for Russia to get its new European security architecture. Putin is hardy enough that he may live to see it.
_____

1 There, financial time moved faster than political time. Those of us on duty then saw each of the four acute phases of the crisis met with measures that only stemmed immediate damage and did nothing to address the underlying issues (this pattern persisted with post-crisis “reforms” and the failure to prosecute any financial firm executives).

Even more alarming, there were obvious information gaps (like which specific major financial players were protection-writers of US subprime credit default swaps) where the authorities could have demanded and gotten answers to at least attempt to get in front of the situation.

sup>2 The failure do so may come from US reluctance to risk breaking NATO. That would mean no or limited EU support for the intended US escalation with China and losing arms sales to NATO members. Even if NATO states, due to their own budgetary and resulting political crises, can’t pay as much as Trump would like, odds favor they would in the end pony up more than now.

3 Exhibit 1 is his betrayal of the man who made him, Ihor Kholimoisky. Kholimoisky was the second richest man in Ukraine. It was Kholimoisky who elevated Zelensky to the Presidency of Ukraine. He owned 70& of the production studio that produced The Servant of the People, which portrayed Zelensky as an honest everyman elevated to the top office in Ukraine, and then backed the campaign that made that story real. Kholimoisky supported Zelensky to defeat then-president “chocolate king” Petro Poroshenko, who had nationalized Kholimoisky’s wobbly PrivatBank. Later criminal and civil cases accused the bank of money laundering and looting it via unsecured loans to shareholders. Despite being a leader in Ukraine’s Jewish community, yours truly has read several accounts depicting Kholimoisky as being entirely uninhibited about forming alliances with Banderite muscle to further his aims.

Kholimoisky’s position weakened in 2020 when the US has launched a criminal investigation. Wikipedia covers what happened then:

In 2020, he was indicted in the United States on charges related to large-scale bank fraud. In 2021, the U.S. banned Kolomoyskyi and his family from entering the country, accusing him of corruption and being a threat to the Ukrainian public’s faith in democratic institutions. Zelenskyy reportedly stripped Kolomoyskyi of his Ukrainian citizenship in 2022. Later that same year, those of Kolomoyskyi’s assets deemed to be of strategic value to the state in light of the Russian invasion were nationalised. These included Ukraine’s largest gasoline companies. In 2023, Kolomoyskyi was arrested by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) on charges of money laundering and fraud, and placed under pre-trial arrest.

The Wikipedia account has lots more gory detail.

4 Plastic, of course.

5 I do not believe that Trump was truthful when he told the New York Post that he and Putin have spoken about the Ukraine war. The Russians had flatly denied any communication between the men since the past Trump presidency. Eight days ago, Alexander Mercouris and Glenn Diesen interviewed the Russian first deputy ambassador to the UN, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK2FDlrEf9w, who specifically denied that there had been any meaningful contacts between the Trump Administration and the Russian government. On February 7, three days ago, Peskov effectively called US claims about communications with Russia lies, in admittedly a highly coded manner. Peskov’s point was that one-way communication is not remotely the sort of dialogue that the Trump Team weirdly keeps trying to pretend is happening. From Anadolu Agency:

Peskov responded to remarks made by US special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, at a news briefing in Moscow about a possible ceasefire ahead of peace talks, saying only a series of daily statements from Washington have been observed, many of which are later refuted.

“We have nothing to add on this topic yet. There are many statements and reports that are later denied, altered, or dismissed as misinformation. There is neither a need nor a desire to respond to every such claim. Until something substantive emerges, patience is required,” he said.

See the tale of two tweets on this topic:

Trump has spoken with Putin on the phone
- Trump said he has a concrete plan to end the war: “I hope it’s fast. Every day people are dying. This war is so bad in Ukraine. I want to end this damn thing”
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/us-news/t ... raine-war/


Oddly, this important exclusive is not on the New York Post’s landing page.

Peskov's full comment to TASS on the publication about Putin's conversation with Trump.

Peskov said that he does not know whether Putin and Trump had a conversation or not. Putin's press secretary cannot not know about this. There is no point in hiding that there was a… Show more


From the English version of the TASS account:

Responding to a question from TASS whether Putin and Trump had a telephone conversation after the inauguration of the American leader, the Kremlin official replied:

“What can be said about this news: as the administration in Washington unfolds its work, many different communications arise. These communications are conducted through different channels. And of course, amid the multiplicity of these communications, I personally may not know something, be unaware of something. Therefore, in this case, I can neither confirm nor deny it.”

Trump has expressed his desire and readiness to talk with Putin many times in recent weeks. However, no official reports of any contacts have been made. Putin’s last conversation with Trump, information about which is available on the Kremlin website, was dated July 23, 2020.

The head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Leonid Slutsky said that work on preparing such contacts “is at an advanced stage.”

Peskov later explained that Russia and the United States have not yet begun discussing a possible meeting between the Russian and American leaders.

On February 7, the Kremlin Spokesman said that the Kremlin would inform about the progress of organizing contacts as substantive information becomes available.


6 Even with more and more press accounts and officials admitting Ukraine is losing the war, even many of the accounts are in the “They have changed their minds, but not their hearts” phase, that they can’t cope with the notion that Russia therefore will win.

7 The US may think twice about deposing Zelensky. Now that Musk has destroyed the US regime change apparatus, any Ukraine elections would be a significantly uncontrolled event. For instance, if former military head Zaluzhny were to return from London, campaign and win, he as a hard core Banderite would be unacceptable to Russia (though it would be interesting to see what pretexts Russia would have to devise) and he might not be willing to revoke the decree that bars negotiations with Russia if Zelensky is in charge. Ukraine has often been a disobedient vassal and that might not change much with new leadership.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/02 ... ensky.html

******

Peter Korotaev & Volodymyr Ishchenko: Why is Ukraine struggling to mobilise its citizens to fight?
February 10, 2025
By Peter Korotaev & Volodymyr Ishchenko, Al Jazeera, 1/23/25

Over the past few months, Ukraine has increasingly been under pressure from its Western allies to start mobilising young men under the age of 25. This came after the mobilisation law passed in April did not deliver the expected number of recruits. Even the lowering of medical requirements – allowing men who had had HIV and tuberculosis infections to serve – did not help much.

Some pro-Western Ukrainian officials, like Roman Kostenko, the secretary of Ukraine’s parliamentary security committee, have also pressed for lowering the age. Kostenko said he is being constantly queried by members of the US Congress why the Ukrainian government asks for weapons but isn’t willing to mobilise its youth.

So far President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has refused to move forward. Part of the reason is demographic fear: Sacrificing young men en masse in a prolonged conflict risks condemning Ukraine to an even bleaker future, where demographic decline undermines its ability to rebuild economically, socially, and politically.

But the Ukrainian president also fears public anger. There is growing and palpable reluctance among Ukrainians to fight in the war. And this is despite the fact that their leaders and civil society frame it as an existential struggle for survival.

Many Ukrainians are indeed fatigued after nearly three years of full-scale war, but their war-weariness is not just a matter of exhaustion. It stems from pre-existing fractures in the nation’s sociopolitical foundations, which the war has only deepened.

Public opinion polls, Ukrainian media reports, and social media posts we have examined, as well as in-depth interviews we have conducted with Ukrainians as part of our research on the consequences of post-Soviet revolutions and wars, help elucidate some of these dynamics.

The post-Soviet social contract

Like in all post-Soviet and post-communist states, a new social contract emerged in the 1990s that reflected the new sociopolitical realities in Ukraine. State-citizen relations were reduced to the following: the state won’t help you, but in return, the state won’t harm you either.

Meanwhile, politics became animated by the dramatic Maidan revolutions of 2004 and 2014. The opportunities created by these uprisings were repeatedly co-opted by narrow elite groups – oligarchs, the professional middle class, and foreign powers – leaving large portions of Ukrainian society excluded and their interests underrepresented.

Before 2022, this situation was tolerable for many Ukrainians to an extent. The borders were open, so millions were able to emigrate. In 2021, Ukraine occupied the eighth place in the ranking of countries with the most international migrants – more than 600,000 left in that year alone. Remittances from the emigrants helped those who stayed behind maintain an acceptable standard of living.

But in the long term, this path did not seem sustainable. In 2020, Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal admitted that the state will struggle to pay state pensions in a decade and a half. After years of declining state capacity and de-development, Ukrainians were unsurprised. The news was received as another indication that one should save up American dollars and try to emigrate.

The war put the already weak social contract to the test. All of a sudden, a state that had hardly been present in Ukrainians’ lives demanded that they sacrifice themselves for its survival.

In the wake of the failure of Russia’s initial invasion plan, the surge of unity fuelled a wave of volunteerism. However, as the war ground on, a stark realisation emerged: the state is distributing the burdens and benefits of the war unequally. While some segments of society gain materially or politically, others bear disproportionate sacrifices, fuelling a growing sense of alienation within a large part of the Ukrainian population.

The state has done little to strengthen its relations with citizens in the face of waning war enthusiasm. Instead, government officials have bombarded the population with messaging about self-reliance.

In September 2023, Minister of Social Policy Oksana Zholnovich called on citizens not to remain dependent on benefits, since this makes them “children”. She proposed a “new social contract” in which citizens accept social spending cuts and live independently as “free swimmers”.

In September 2024, the government announced it was not going to increase the minimum wage and social security payments in 2025 despite inflation reaching 12 percent.

A crisis of motivation

As the third year of the war is about to wrap up, the consequences of this weak social contract are becoming increasingly apparent. The narrative of fighting an existential war no longer seems to move the majority of Ukrainians.

The words of one of our interviewees are quite illuminating. This person fundraises for non-lethal military equipment for the army – but not drones or other weapons, because he believes that “the state completely failed in its most critical role of preventing war”. He told us: “I don’t understand why this war should fully become my war in the truest sense of the word.”

He said he found it hard to be open about his views: “When you want to live as you wish, you only speak openly in close circles. Either you have to let go of all ambitions, part of your identity, or consider emigration because this country will ultimately become completely foreign to you.”

The attitude that this is not “our war” can be seen reflected in polls conducted throughout the past year, in which a silent majority does not seem ready to mobilise to fight.

In an April 2024 poll, only 10 percent of respondents said that most of their relatives were ready to be mobilised. A June survey showed that only 32 percent “fully or partly supported” the new mobilisation law; 52 percent opposed it, and the rest refused to answer.

In a July poll, only 32 percent disagreed with the statement “mobilisation will have no effect other than increased deaths”. A mere 27 percent believed that forced mobilisation was necessary to solve issues at the front line.

According to another July poll, only 29 percent considered it shameful to be a draft dodger.

A consistent pattern can be seen in these surveys: those supporting the continuation or strengthening conscription only constitute about a third of the population; a significant minority evade responding to such questions, reflected in the large number of “hard to say” or “don’t know” answers; and the rest openly reject mobilisation.

These attitudes on conscription may seem at odds with results from “victory” polls. The majority in such surveys still indicate that “victory” for Ukraine should mean reclaiming all territories within its 1991 borders and rejecting any concessions to Russia.

But there is really no contradiction here. It is evident that while most Ukrainians would like to see “total victory”, they are unwilling to sacrifice their lives for this goal and empathise with others who feel the same. That is why the majority also supports a negotiated peace as soon as possible.

The lack of motivation to fight is also apparent in the rates of draft dodging. Per the April mobilisation law, all men eligible for mobilisation were to submit their details to the draft offices by July 17. By the deadline, only 4 million men had done so, while 6 million had not.

And of those who entered their details, various officials have said that from 50 to 70-80 percent had medical or other reasons allowing them to legally avoid mobilisation.

Meanwhile, groups and channels have proliferated on Telegram to alert people to the presence of mobilisation officers in certain areas; they have continued to run despite some members getting arrested.

The mobilisation authorities have launched investigations against 500,000 men for draft evasion so far.

Socioeconomic tension

Draft dodging has not only revealed the scope of the crisis of motivation but also the extent to which the war has massively deepened class divides.

Over the past year, there have been regular news reports of officials accepting massive bribes in exchange for exempting men from military service.

In one case made public in early October, a top medical official who also served on a local council representing the ruling Servant of the People party, amassed a fortune taking bribes to facilitate draft-dodging through disability slips. The local police said it found $6m in cash and released a photo of a family member who had photographed themselves on a bed with piles of dollars.

Less than two weeks later, Ukrainian media reported that nearly all prosecutors in the region where the medical official operated were registered as “disabled”. In the aftermath of the scandal, Zelenskyy sacked some officials and triumphantly abolished the institution responsible for giving out disability slips. Uncomfortable questions about why top officials didn’t notice these corrupt schemes were dismissed.

Those who do not have thousands of dollars to pay for a medical exemption or bribe border police, attempt dangerous journeys at Ukraine’s western borders. As a result, a significant portion of Ukraine’s border patrol is stationed on the “peaceful” western borders.

Since 2022, 45 Ukrainians have drowned in the Tysa River on the border with Romania and Hungary in desperate attempts to flee. There have been multiple cases of Ukrainian men trying to escape the country shot and killed by their own country’s border patrol. In March, a video went viral of a border patrol guard madly shooting into the Tysa to demonstrate what he does to draft dodgers, saying: “$1000 to cross this river isn’t worth it”.

There have been cases of dozens of men attempting to cross the border at a time. Once caught, photographs of these “shameful draft dodgers” have been shared on social media, with the captions often stating that they are being sent to the front.

Thus, those who make it to the front line are usually too poor or too unfortunate to have been caught by draft officers. As parliamentarian Mariana Bezuhla put it in mid-September after visiting the front lines near Pokrovsk, the people there were mainly those who could not “decide things” with a bribe. In a November TV interview, a military commander said that 90 percent of those at the front are “forcibly mobilised villagers”.

Army officers often complain of the low quality of these “busified” troops, the term referring to the minibuses into which draft-age men are dragged off the streets. No wonder there have been hundreds of arson attacks against these vehicles.

The effect of such violent coercion unleashed onto mostly impoverished Ukrainian men is the extremely low morale at the front line. As of November 2024, there were four mobilised soldiers for every volunteer.

Mass desertions by mobilised soldiers have been leading to constant retreats. In recent weeks, reports have surfaced that hundreds of “busified” men in the 155th brigade deserted before they were deployed to stop the advance of the Russians near Pokrovsk.

In a July Facebook post, a mobilised Ukrainian journalist bemoaned the lack of patriotism among his fellow conscripts. He wrote that most of the people he served with were from poor, rural regions and were more interested in discussing government corruption than anything else. His attempts to remind them of their patriotic duty failed to convince them:

“A significant portion of the people openly state: Over my 30-40-50 years, the state hasn’t given anything except a Kalashnikov. Why should I be a patriot?’” he observed.

These soldiers certainly aren’t insufficiently acquainted with the realities of war. They aren’t distant civilians tired of frontline footage on the television. But they have good reasons to be suspicious of patriotic imperatives.

Morale problems are compounded by the abuse recruits suffer during mobilisation and deployment. Each month sees a new case of someone beaten to death in the mobilisation stations. In December, media revelations pointed to systemic torture and extortion within the ranks of the Ukrainian army.

In a September interview with a local media outlet, Ukrainian officer Yusuf Walid claimed that 90 percent of officers treat the mobilised “like animals”.

Walid also said that the generation of those born in the 1980s and ’90s are “hopeless” in terms of their patriotic commitments – all they care about is economic survival. This is hardly surprising, given that the post-Soviet Ukrainian social contract convinced individuals to focus on their own survival rather than asking for “handouts” from the state.

The ‘warrior elite’

While the rural poor are coerced into fighting at the front lines, there is a well-off urban minority that lives a relatively protected, comfortable life in Kyiv and Lviv. This “warrior elite” – composed of activists, intellectuals, journalists and NGO workers – maintains the patriotic narrative that Ukraine must fight till victory.

Yet, it seems many members of this elite appear to be reluctant to join the fight at the front line. There have been a number of high-profile patriotic journalists and activists who have called for mass mobilisation, while themselves seeking exemptions on medical or other grounds.

Among them is Yury Butusov, a very well-known military journalist, who reportedly sought an exemption on the grounds of being a father of three children, and Serhiy Sternenko, a prominent nationalist “activist”, who claimed disability exemption for “bad eyesight”.

In June, the employees of 133 NGOs and enterprises receiving foreign funding were granted official exemption from mobilisation. Many of these organisations are not involved in maintaining any critical infrastructure.

While enthusiastically supporting the pro-war narrative of fighting until total “victory”, Ukraine’s patriotic intelligentsia blames all corruption and the growing failures of the state on the statist Soviet past.

In their view, the solution is simply to continue to diminish the role of the state. But austerity has not only done little to endear Ukrainians to their government, especially in times of war, but has also largely failed in terms of its stated aims.

One just has to look at the various corruption scandals in enterprises run by highly paid “reform” officials, who are supported by Western allies. These “reformed” companies mainly wage the struggle against corruption by keeping the rest on minuscule wages, like state railway company Ukrzalyznytsia, or letting go of their workers.

The anticorruption rhetoric is blind to the class divides that it helps entrench. Ordinary Ukrainians often joke about the high salaries received by “anti-corruption observers” and young “reform” members of the board of directors of top state companies.

Anticorruption serves more often than not as a justification for neoliberal policies that favour the business interests of international capital. Ironically, the dismantling of state enterprises driven by such considerations severely weakened Ukraine’s massive Soviet-era military-industrial complex after 2014, which affected its war capabilities.

But instead of blaming themselves for the current state of affairs, the nationalists tend to blame the Ukrainian people. Dmytro Kukharchuk, a well-known nationalist officer, gave a long interview in July about Ukraine’s dim military prospects. According to him, “there are many more khokhols [the Russian “colonial” slur against Ukrainians] today” than there are “true” Ukrainians. He defines “khokhols” as those unwilling to fight for Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

Kukharchuk belongs to the leadership of the extreme-right National Corps party and commands a battalion in a brigade linked to the Azov movement. The sentiments he expresses might seem confined to the fringe, but his rhetoric is far from unique. It echoes a narrative that has dominated Ukrainian, and more broadly, post-Soviet, national-liberal civil society and intelligentsia since the 1990s. This narrative, repeated endlessly, derides the majority of the population – dismissively labelled as bydlo, or “cattle”.

This disparaging term targets those who, in the view of these elites, cling to “Soviet” habits, prioritise personal wellbeing, value state-provided welfare, and resist self-sacrifice for nation-building. Such discourse is not only ethnonationalist but profoundly classist, painting a large segment of the population – primarily workers, poor people, and pensioners – as obstacles to reactionary-defined social progress while valourising a narrow, self-defined vanguard of the nation.

The disconnect

Ukraine’s growing setbacks in the war cannot be attributed to Russia’s overwhelming power or insufficient Western aid. History provides numerous examples of nations overcoming far stronger adversaries in protracted conflicts, often with little or no military or financial support from powerful allies like NATO.

Consider not only Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s and Afghanistan 1979 – 2021, but also revolutionary France after 1789 and revolutionary Russia after 1917, both of which successfully repelled counter-revolutionary interventions by other great powers. These revolutionary movements not only survived but went on to dominate large parts of Europe.

Time and again, social revolutions and national liberation struggles have demonstrated the ability to forge stronger and more mobilised states against all odds.

According to the dominant narrative, Ukraine should fit into this pattern: a nation emerging from Russian and Soviet oppression, driven by successive national liberation movements, dissident intelligentsia, Maidan revolutions, and the resistance to Russia’s “hybrid war” in the Donbas. This story culminates in the unity and resilience of the Ukrainian people repelling the full-scale invasion of 2022. But this narrative appears fundamentally flawed.

This may be because Ukraine’s is simply one of many post-Soviet trajectories shaped by the modernising successes and later the degradation of the Soviet revolution. Like in many other countries in the region, the state after independence was captured by predatory and comprador elites who prioritised their own interests over the public good.

This failure to deliver meaningful opportunities and protections for the majority of Ukrainians has left the state unable to demand much from them in return. As a result, today, Ukraine is unable to fully mobilise its people who are divided by a profound sociopolitical disconnect.

Contrary to the popular narrative of national unity, there has been no cohesive project of national development to bridge the divide between those bearing the brunt of the war and the political and intellectual elites who claim to represent them both at home and abroad. This disconnect undermines the idea of a shared purpose driving the nation forward.

More and more, it seems the only emotion truly uniting the fragmented Ukrainian nation is fear. Not the lofty ideals of nation-building, but the visceral dread of personal and communal devastation. This fear stems from the apprehension of losing one’s home if the front line comes close, the anguish of becoming precarious refugees, or the terror of enduring months in basements, hiding from relentless shelling and street battles. Even for those whose homes remain intact, fear persists – of lawlessness, looting, murder, sexual violence – the grim realities that often accompany military occupations.

If Ukrainians are united only by a fundamentally negative coalition – by shared fears rather than shared aspirations – then what happens when these fears begin to shift and compete? Some people start weighing them against one another. The fear of losing one’s home to invasion is measured against the fear of enduring forced conscription, becoming cannon fodder in a war that seems increasingly difficult to win.

There is the fear of repression under occupation, juxtaposed with the fear of being arrested in a state where civil society and government increasingly diverge from their own views of freedom and human rights. There is the fear of being humiliated as a khokhol by Russians or as a Russian-speaking mankurt (a disparaging term for someone who has lost touch with their roots) by your own nationalists.

These shifting fears drive the Ukrainian population, but they do not unite it.

We talked to a Ukrainian man in his 50s who did not leave his town in the Kharkiv region even when the front line got just a few kilometres from it and there was regular shelling by the Russians. He could have left for a safer part of Ukraine, but he did not and stayed to help, distributing humanitarian aid to his neighbours.

He is not a coward; he is a patriot. But as he said, he is not willing “to die for the state we have now. Not for that Ukraine which is imposed on us now …This is my country, but this is not my state.”

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/02/pet ... -to-fight/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Wed Feb 12, 2025 12:48 pm

"They may come to an agreement, they may not."
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 12/02/2025

Image

In his fourth week in office, Donald Trump continues to give the press, both friendly and critical, the big headlines they have always expected from him. On a daily basis, and despite the rejection he has caused both among the Palestinian population and the Arab countries and even among US allies, the American leader uses every public appearance to reaffirm his commitment to the plan for ethnic cleansing of Gaza. Going even further than Benjamin Netanyahu, who welcomed the plan but, when asked, assumed that part of the population could at some point in the future and under certain conditions return to the strip, Donald Trump wanted to make it clear that in this plan for American ownership of the region - "I will own it," he insisted - there will be no right of return, Israel's dream since its formation in 1948. The objective and the proposed ways to achieve it are the perfect barometer to measure how President Trump will try to impose his interests, sometimes national but sometimes simply personal or family-related, in his second term in power, the four years in which he does not have to worry about re-election, but about going down in history with some of his milestones.

Donald Trump's bitter rivalry with Barack Obama, which can be traced back to a press dinner to which the future president was invited to be used as the butt of jokes, is a reminder that the Republican leader is pursuing some of the goals achieved by the Democratic president, including the Nobel Peace Prize.

“I believe that Trump has made considerable contributions to world peace and can do more in the future,” Oleksandr Merezhko, a deputy from Zelensky’s party, chairman of the Rada’s foreign affairs committee and the man who nominated the American president for the prestigious prize, wrote in a letter to the Nobel Prize committee. The idea is not new and last December, when it was wrongly assumed that peace would be a priority for the then president-elect, several media outlets picked up on the possibility of such an outcome. “Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize opportunity in Ukraine,” stated the Atlantic Council , “What Trump wants from the Ukraine deal: the Nobel Peace Prize,” added The Times , pointing to a personal interest that has little to do with peace and more to do with fame and personal status.

“Peace must be fair, it must be dignified and it must be based on the principle that nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine,” said Ruslan Stefanchuk, the speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, in his address to MEPs today,” wrote the official account of the European Parliament yesterday, accompanying the statement with a photograph of Stefanchuk with his fist on his heart, a customary salute of the Azov movement and other right-wing nationalist groups. Beyond the speech, which supports any assertion, the decision on nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine and the just and dignified peace is far from Kiev and Brussels, and in this process the interests of the country and its population are by no means one of the priorities for those who have the power to decide.

The Munich Security Conference, Keith Kellogg’s meetings with European allies, JD Vance’s with Volodymyr Zelensky, or the first visit by a Trump administration official to Ukraine may change the dynamics slightly, but for now, the long-awaited plan of the Republican administration to bring a quick end to the war remains non-existent. “US envoy for Russia and Ukraine Keith Kellogg told US allies in recent meetings that he is preparing options for ending the war in Ukraine to present to Trump, three Western officials familiar with the talks told Semafor ,” the American outlet writes. Although Kellogg continues to “prepare options” for Donald Trump to decide what to do, one thing has become clear: the United States sees the war and the Ukrainian issue from an economic point of view.

Unlike Gaza, where Jared Kushner has shown interest in building on the front line in the past, Donald Trump does not seem to see Ukraine as a “real estate issue,” a definition he has used for Palestine. With fewer and fewer signs of whether the US president is even partially interested in peace or just focused on his own interests, Trump and his team have delved deeper into this idea in their recent media appearances.

On Sunday, in one of the political shows on American television, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz insisted that security guarantees for Ukraine, a key aspect for Zelensky and without which Kiev will not accept any agreement as long as it still has the means to fight, will fall to European countries. The Trump administration is seeking an agreement to end the war, but its lack of interest in Europe means that it does not seem to plan to have a military or even political presence in the day after the war. “There are voices that say that Europe could offer security guarantees without the Americans, and I always say no,” said the Ukrainian president during an hour-long interview with The Guardian in the presidential administration in Kiev. “Security guarantees without the United States are not real security guarantees,” he added,” wrote Shaun Walker yesterday in what is Zelensky’s response to the increasingly explicit intention of the United States to leave the economic cost of the war and of a post-war period that is expected to be unstable and costly in the hands of European countries. The only negotiation Zelensky hopes to have is with his allies, not his Russian enemy, and he intends to focus on the security guarantees that were already denied to him in 2022 and that the United States also seems to reject now, largely out of disinterest in the Ukrainian cause and for economic interests.

The United States, less concerned about peace than about the state of its accounts, remains willing to supply arms to Ukraine, albeit in exchange for payment. “The Trump administration plans to press European allies to buy more American weapons for Ukraine ahead of possible peace talks with Moscow, two people familiar with the matter said, a move that could improve Kiev’s negotiating position. If formalized, the plan will offer some reassurance to Ukrainian leaders who have worried that President Donald Trump could block further aid to the country, whose military has been slowly losing territory under a fierce Russian assault in the east,” Reuters wrote on Monday .

Donald Trump's intentions have always been clear. The priority is to end the war so that it stops costing the United States public money, which wants to focus on its political, economic and military rivalry with China. European countries must bear any additional costs, whether in the time remaining in the battle or in the armed peace that will foreseeably follow a possible ceasefire, and Washington will be there to sell them whatever weapons are needed.

“Let’s make a deal,” said an exultant Zelensky, showing Reuters reporters a previously classified map of Ukraine’s natural resources. In his wilful naivety, the Ukrainian president intends to buy, by sharing Ukraine’s economic resources with the United States, Washington’s presence as a guarantee that his government will not suffer the same fate as Ashraf Ghani’s. In recent hours, and in an unquestionably explicit manner, Donald Trump has made it clear that this wealth is considered payment for services already rendered.

“They have tremendously valuable lands in terms of rare earths, in terms of oil and gas,” Donald Trump said in an interview with Fox News on the day of the Super Bowl, a date traditionally with large television audiences. “I want our money to be secure, because we are spending hundreds of billions of dollars,” he continued. And in the sentence most highlighted by the European media, the US president added that “they can make a deal or they can’t. They can be Russian one day or they can’t be,” to which Dmitry Peskov responded that a significant part of Ukraine is already Russian. By highlighting this statement, the media has focused more on the idea of ​​abandoning Ukraine to the mercy of Russia than on the deep disinterest shown by the American leader in the Ukrainian proxy. “We are going to have all this money there, and I say I want it back. And I told them I want the equivalent, like $500 billion worth of rare earths. And they've basically agreed to do it, so at least we don't feel stupid," Trump added, giving a figure that doubles the amount the United States has committed to the Ukraine war.

Unlike in Gaza, where Trump and his clan have shown they have economic interests and a desire to remain on the ground, in Ukraine the US president is only interested in plunder, a colonial relationship to which Volodymyr Zelensky is willing to entrust the fate of the country and its population.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/12/puede ... de-que-no/

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's telegram account:

Colonelcassad
🎖🎖🎖 The Russian Defense Ministry on the progress of repelling the attempted invasion of the Ukrainian Armed Forces into the territory of the Russian Federation in the Kursk Region (as of February 12, 2025)

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to defeat the formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kursk Region.

- During offensive actions, units of the North group of forces inflicted defeat on the formations of two tank, heavy mechanized, five mechanized, three airborne assault brigades, a marine brigade, an assault brigade, a territorial defense brigade and three assault regiments of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the areas of the settlements of Gogolevka, Guevo, Zaoleshenka, Kazachya Loknya, Kositsa, Kurilovka, Lebedevka, Makhnovka, Nikolsky, Oleshnya, Rubanshchina, Sverdlikovo and Sudzha. Three enemy counterattacks were repelled.

- Strikes by operational-tactical, army aviation and artillery fire hit enemy manpower and equipment in the areas of the populated areas of Viktorovka, Goncharovka, 1st Knyazhiy, Kolmakov, Kruglenkoye, Loknya, Malaya Loknya, Martynovka, Makhnovka, Mirny, Melovoy, Nikolsky, Nikolayevka, Cherkasskoye Porechnoye, as well as Basovka, Belovody, Vodolaghi, Veselovka, Zhuravka, Miropolye and Yunakovka in the Sumy region.

- Over the past 24 hours, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have lost over 390 servicemen, two tanks have been destroyed, including one German-made Leopard tank, two infantry fighting vehicles, including one US-made Bradley IFV, three armored personnel carriers, 10 armored combat vehicles, 20 cars, a US-made M109 Paladin self-propelled artillery mount and five artillery pieces, four mortars, a Strela-10 anti-aircraft missile system, an electronic warfare station, a German-made Biber bridgelayer, an engineering reconnaissance vehicle, an armored repair and recovery vehicle, as well as two UAV command posts and an ammunition depot. One Ukrainian serviceman has surrendered.

- In total, during the military operations in the Kursk direction, the enemy lost more than 59,940 servicemen, 361 tanks, 262 infantry fighting vehicles, 211 armored personnel carriers, 1,854 armored combat vehicles, 1,944 vehicles, 430 artillery pieces, 48 ​​multiple launch rocket system launchers, including 13 HIMARS and six MLRS made in the USA, 19 anti-aircraft missile system launchers, eight transport and loading vehicles, 107 electronic warfare stations, 15 counter-battery radars, six air defense radars, 41 units of engineering and other equipment, including 18 engineering obstacle clearing vehicles, one UR-77 mine clearing unit, two bridgelayers, an engineering reconnaissance vehicle, as well as ten armored repair and recovery vehicles and a command and staff vehicle. The operation to destroy the Ukrainian Armed Forces formations continues.

***

Colonelcassad
Summary of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of February 12, 2025 ). Key points:

- Air defense systems shot down 12 HIMARS projectiles, 2 Hammer bombs, and 66 drones in 24 hours;

- The losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the area of ​​the Center group of forces in 24 hours amounted to more than 510 soldiers and four combat armored vehicles;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 215 soldiers in the area of ​​the South group in 24 hours;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost more than 210 soldiers in the area of ​​the West group in 24 hours;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 95 soldiers as a result of the actions of the North and Dnepr groups;

- The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 150 soldiers and a tank in 24 hours in the area of ​​responsibility of the East group.

▫️Units of the "East" group of forces improved the situation along the forward edge, defeated the manpower and equipment of two mechanized , tank , airborne assault brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and three territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Konstantinopol, Komar, Burlatskoye, Vremyevka, Novopol, Novocheretovatoye of the Donetsk People's Republic and Gulyaipole of the Zaporizhia region. The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 150 servicemen, a tank, seven vehicles and four field artillery guns. A multifunctional radar station RADA RPS-42 made in Israel was destroyed .



▫️Units of the Dnepr group of forces defeated formations of three mechanized , infantry , mountain assault brigades , three coastal defense brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and a territorial defense brigade in the areas of the settlements of Mala Tokmachka, Orekhov, Kamenskoe, Pyatikhatki, Shcherbaky in the Zaporizhia region and Prydniprovske in the Kherson region. The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 60 servicemen, a tank, five vehicles and an artillery piece. Five ammunition depots and an electronic warfare station were destroyed.



▫️ This morning, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation launched a group missile strike on the workshops of Ukrainian military-industrial complex enterprises producing unmanned aerial vehicles and FPV drones. The strike targets were achieved, all planned objects were hit.

▫️Also, operational-tactical aviation , strike unmanned aerial vehicles , missile forces and artillery of the groups of troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation inflicted damage on the infrastructure of military airfields, storage sites for fuel and lubricants, a temporary deployment point for foreign mercenaries, as well as concentrations of manpower and equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 139 districts.

▫️ Air defense systems shot down 12 US-made HIMARS multiple launch rockets , two French-made Hammer guided aerial bombs , and 66 aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the following have been destroyed: 653 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 43,045 unmanned aerial vehicles, 592 anti-aircraft missile systems, 21,299 tanks and other armored combat vehicles, 1,514 multiple launch rocket systems, 21,567 field artillery pieces and mortars, and 31,492 units of special military vehicles.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

*****

History is written by foreign hands: musical interlude

War is coming, Cold and wet, long and cruel. Run, brother, run (1997). Andriy Kuzmenko, the Ukrainian Skryabin. Where to find the truth when brother turns on brother
Events in Ukraine
Feb 10, 2025


Time for some music. We’ll have a look at the good - Andriy Kuzmenko - and the bad/ugly - Svyatoslav Vakarchuk. Nationalism, corruption, euromaidan mysterious car accidents, and predicting war back in the misty year of 1997. Kuzmenko was the only popstar who decided to say the truth about all these things, and he may have paid for it with his life.

I’ve written here several times about Svyatoslav Vakarchuk, the popstar who got in and out of politics. His ultra-liberal, pro-western Holos party was the favorite of the Atlantic Council.

Vakarchuk himself had little time for Ukraine and flew off to California, where he threw himself into studying the works of his beloved Fukuyama. The latter also made many statements praising Vakarchuk and hoping he would become Ukraine’s president.

Image
Unfortunately for the Atlanticists, Vakarchuk’s abilities don’t seem to go beyond taking his shirt off at concerts. He gave up on politics rather quickly. And while he presents himself as patriot number one nowadays, he only finds time to do world concert tours.

Back in the 2000s of course, he often played in Russia. Ukrainian social media users often like to poke fun of this air-headed hypocrite by posting old videos of him speaking in Russian and defending his Russian compatriots.

Image
Vakarchuk made a return to headlines last year when his fans got mobilized at his concert, which didn’t bother him at all. It also emerged that his brother works as a mobilization officer.

Music in Ukraine has long ago become an arena for politics. I’ve written here about nazi rap and nazi punk. And just about all popstars have become some kind of variation on Vakarchuk.

But there was one popstar who certainly had principles - Andriy Kuzmenko, also known as Skryabin. Unlike Vakarchuk, Kuzmenko didn’t go on to live a coddled life in California. Instead, he died in a car accident in 2015.

When you listen to the lyrics of his songs, let alone his final interviews, it isn’t hard to see why many believe his death wasn’t accidental. He felt no fear whatsoever in criticizing the most sacred myths surrounding the war and the euromaidan ‘revolution of dignity’.

Image

Social war
Skryabin was unique in the fact that his songs addressed the issues faced by the majority of Ukrainians - poverty, emigration, the struggle to survive.

The following lines are from his song ‘Ruin’, whose music video features scenes from Skryabin’s impoverished west Ukraine. His lines about how ‘everyone else plays roles in a film about fools’ ring particularly true in a truly apocalyptic era where the president is a former TV comic:



My country has Kyiv, Volyn, and the Carpathians,
Donbas and the Black Sea, Odesa and Lviv.
And in it, only the deputies live lavishly,
While everyone else plays roles in a film about fools.
Clenching their teeth, people stand and let the motorcades pass,
Earning only a bottle of wine in a month.
A Ukrainian’s greatest joy – to make it to tomorrow,
We’ve all been in trenches for years, though this isn’t war.

And my country is a complete ruin,
Proudly walking in caps and sweatpants.
And my country is a complete ruin,
How can one not love their land that much?..


No wonder one of the top comments on the above reads:

This is one of the few true patriots of Ukraine who is remembered in both Lviv and Donetsk.

Another of his most famous songs is called ‘we got screwed’:



I think, dude, we got screwed!..

I had a Country, I loved it
For its cornflower eyes, for people—like ships.
I spent half my life with it,
Pressing my body against its warm earth.

Na-na-na, na-nai-na, na-na...

But now it's terrifying here—I’ve fallen out of love,
Its eyes turned gray and angry, its ships rusted.
We dreamed of making this place a paradise,
But now we realize—we just got screwed!

Chorus:
Like fools, they tricked us behind our backs,
Did their deeds, flushed us away,
Me and you—straight down the drain,
Flushed us away!
They just screwed us over,
Like fools, they tricked us behind our backs,
Did their deeds, flushed us away,
Me and you—straight down the drain,
Flushed us away!

There are many of us, I’m not the only one,
We'll board the train and scatter everywhere.
Let someone else search for happiness
Among the crows that peck at you.
Because here—we just got screwed!


Maidan

Skryabin was one of Ukraine’s few unifying figures. Singing in Ukrainian, and hailing from the Lviv region, he certainly didn’t conform to the stereotype of the ‘aggressively ethnonationalist west Ukrainian’. On the contrary, in songs like ‘warm winter’ (2009), he sung:

Dark clouds have covered our sky,
Greedy people take everything for themselves.
And you and I—saddened to the core,
Fighting like flies against a wall.
It’s a disaster, nothing like this exists elsewhere,
They play with us like puppets,
Pit us against each other,
Make up new laws for us.
For us, it's destruction—for them, just a joke.
Listen, brother, something's been wrong here for a long time.

What difference does it make who is who?
What language we speak—it’s all the same.
Just let us live in peace.
We’re fed up with your evil.
We’ve all been the same for a long time.
You’ll never understand
That east and west stand together.
Just let us live in peace.
In peace! (In peace!)

We never know what to expect from you,
Every morning, waking up is terrifying.
The radio only brings bad news,
Repeating every half hour.
A warm winter—
In that country, there’s not even snow.




Aesthetically, the contrast is stark - where Skryabin’s music videos featured ordinary, working class Ukrainians, Vakarchuk focuses on rarefied urban hipsters, the privileged nationalist minority he belongs to:



Thematically, compare Kuzmenko’s call for unity to Vakarchuk’s ‘Shoot’, which Azov enjoys using in its military porn mashups. ‘Shoot’ was released in 2013, when Ukraine’s western-funded media was doing its best to stoke the fire of social unrest against then-president Yanukovych. Vakarchuk, unlike Kuzmenko, enthusiastically played his part in warming up violently divisive passions during the euromaidan. The lyrics of the song:

Shoot!
Tell me, why are you afraid
To take this final step?
Come on!
Let it be the way you want.
I’ve already paid for my lesson…
Farewell, my little angel.
Go on! Pull the trigger.


(Paywall with free option.)

https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/p/ ... eign-hands

******

Ukraine - There Is Nothing Left To Trade For More War Or A Peace Deal

When Donald Trump got re-elected the leadership of Ukraine was elated (archived):

t comes as quite a surprise—and as an indication of just how bad things have become in the country in recent months—to learn that many senior officials [in Ukraine] were hoping for a Donald Trump victory. Faced with the choice of continued bare life-support or a wildcard president who would rip up the rules and almost certainly cut aid, they were prepared to gamble.
President Volodymyr Zelensky was quick to endorse the victory, and in fulsome terms. “We look forward to an era of a strong United States of America under President Trump’s decisive leadership,” he wrote on X (formerly Twitter, and now run by the pro-Trump billionaire Elon Musk). This was not just spin. In private, his staff have become increasingly frustrated by what they describe as the Biden administration’s “self-deterrence”, the habit of fearing escalation with Russia to the point of paralysis, and a growing gap between the rhetoric of “standing with Ukraine for as long as it takes” and actions that suggest the opposite.


Zelenski thought that he could make deals with Trump:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy pored over a once-classified map of vast deposits of rare earths and other critical minerals during an interview with Reuters on Friday, part of a push to appeal to Donald Trump's penchant for a deal.
The U.S. president, whose administration is pressing for a rapid end to Ukraine's war with Russia, said on Monday he wanted Ukraine to supply the U.S. with rare earths and other minerals in return for financially supporting its war effort.

"If we are talking about a deal, then let's do a deal, we are only for it," Zelenskiy said, emphasising Ukraine's need for security guarantees from its allies as part of any settlement.


Trump agreed to take the offer but in return of nothing for it:

Trump, 78, insisted that the US should have access to Ukraine’s natural resources regardless of whether a peace deal between Russia and the former Soviet state can be successfully negotiated, arguing that the “more than $300 billion” the US has provided Ukraine dwarfs what other nations have contributed to the war effort.
“They may make a deal. They may not make a deal. They may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday. But we’re going to have all this money in [Ukraine] and I say, I want it back,” the president said.

“I told them that I want the equivalent of like $500 billion worth of rare earth [minerals], and they’ve essentially agreed to do that,” Trump revealed.


There are many delusions in all of this. Those rare earth and other valuable deposits in Ukraine which are economically viable to explore have already been sold to various businessmen and international companies (machine translation):

In order for the United States to work with Ukrainian minerals, permits for the operation of deposits must be withdrawn from the current owners, in particular from the former Minister of Ecology and president of Burisma Mykola Zlochevsky.
This was stated in his Telegram channel by the head of the committee. The Supreme Court Minister of Finance, Tax and Customs Policy Daniil Hetmantsev.


Before giving them to the U.S. Ukraine would have to steal those back:

"For 30 years, all permits for commercially interesting deposits have already been distributed to "respectable" people. That is, we have nothing or almost nothing to offer our partners," Hetmantsev wrote.
He added that the priority issue now is to audit all mineral deposits and return them to the people. Moreover, this issue, according to Hetmantsev, should be "resolved regardless of the interests of the United States or other partners."


The whole argument from either side is thus a scam. There are no minerals for Ukraine to simply hand over to Trump. Whatever is there has already been sold or is too expensive to retrieve (see here for details (in Russian)). Moreover, there is no price Trump will accept to further support Ukraine or to hand it some guarantees.

U.S. attempts to get to some ceasefire are stillborn. Trump is unwilling to give Russia what it has demanded. Knowing that the U.S. can not to be trusted Russia is not willing to accept anything less than that:

The very short version of the argument is that top Russian officials, most visibly Putin, have taken to regularly and in very long form describing the US and Western record of duplicity, not just with Ukraine but on other fronts. This line of commentary has only become more pointed and the bill of particulars of Western treachery, longer.
This means the Russians are clearly, repeatedly, and consistently saying any agreement with the West would be worthless. The obvious implication isn’t simply that there would be nothing to gain in signing one, but that it would be self-destructive to do so, since it would give Russia a false sense of security that the West would exploit, as it has again and again and again.

In other words, all of the focus on the content of a potential agreement misses the elephant in the room: the content is almost irrelevant. Russians cannot get to a process by which the perfidious West can be made trustworthy.


With talks going nowhere Trump may try to delay a Russian victory. Or he may want to dump the whole issue to Europe.

Neither will work:

[T]hinking that Ukraine can hold out as long as early 2026 seems charitable. And given the Trump team’s apparent complete misreading of Russia’s cards, they seem vanishingly unlikely to believe how Russia can and will simply proceed to roll over Ukraine and not even break all that much of a sweat in the process.
And that’s before Trump’s outsized ego getting in the way. I don’t think he is constitutionally able to deal with Putin from a position of real weakness, which will result in further delay in setting up a meeting, and that eventual session resulting in Putin and Trump talking past each other.


There will be no peace deal.

This outcome of this war will have to be decided on the battlefield.

Posted by b on February 11, 2025 at 16:34 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/02/u ... l#comments

*******

Zelensky’s 100 days might end in Florida as Trump prepares his Ukraine plan

Martin Jay

February 10, 2025

Two recent media events where Zelensky clearly stated, some would even say ‘begged’, for a deal with Donald Trump might indicate that he is in panic mode.

Are we witnessing the final days of caretaker President Zelensky? Two recent media events where he clearly stated, some would even say ‘begged’, for a deal with Donald Trump might indicate that he is now in panic mode. Zelensky’s recent offer to Trump for the U.S. to take Ukraine’s mineral reserves reveals a lot about the former comedian turned politician. In numerous speeches and various media events he has repeatedly talkedч about the Ukrainian people, Europe and the sanctity of democracy all being under threat when Russia wins the war. But now we can see all that was BS and that now, without Hollywood movie stars raising his profile of hundreds of media outlets pumping out the fake news to support him, we get to what really matters above all: mineral wealth.

The problem or dilemma Zelensky has is not unlike that of a dying old man who has millions in the bank. Does he hand over all his wealth to the best doctors to buy a few more years of life, based on their promises, or does he accept the end is near? His logic is not complicated. His chief focus is his own power and positon above all. But is a peace deal, with or without a mineral sweetner compatible with his presidential incumbency? Something, it would seem, has to give.

What he is now doing is certainly panicking. There can be no other way to look at the recent media spots. With practically now all U.S. and UK media taking the line that the war is being lost now to Russia and further reports that Moscow could be planning a major push with one or two brigades, time is of the essence. He needs to think clearly. Perhaps delusional western powers like the UK are preventing any lucid, realistic thinking, given that David Lammy, the British foreign secretary recently visited him and handed him a cheque for over 60 million USD and told him that Britain is prepared to replace the U.S. militarily. Yes, that’s 60, you read correctly. While it’s unclear what an army in defeat could do with this small change, given that U.S. experts are estimating that just for the Ukraine army to continue for one more year they would need between 50 and 100 BILLION dollars, the British should thank Zelensky for keeping a straight face at the farce.

Zelensky’s problem is how to secure a peace deal and come out looking like a winner. Add to that almost mission impossible is his insistence on “western security” guaranties – read NATO membership – and you can see why things are not exactly moving forward very quickly.

Trump has announced a peace deal to be agreed in April. Like the 600-pound gorilla in the room, he is likely to make it happen, or at least a ceasefire of sorts, but will Zelensky still be president when it happens? Zelensky is rapidly realizing the trap and just how entangled he is in the centre of it. Give Trump a huge bribe? It might not cut it given that Trump must already be looking at who to replace Zelensky, who would probably offer more. Both Trump and Zelensky need to come out of it as victors and it was interesting how he used the word “victory” when explaining it to the Reuters journalists (do they actually ask questions or is it just their job to be his PR apparatus?). Yet the question of Putin being a victor has not been tackled, given that he’s already winning and holds all the cards. While it is true that the intensity of fighting is certainly the case on the Russian side, it is quite wrong of both Lammy and Zelensky who claim Putin doesn’t want to talk. This is coded talk which means simply “he’s not prepared to give us what we want”.

It’s unlikely Zelensky will be the broker to make the deal happen as we head towards Trump’s 100-day deadline and I predict, as I have been doing so for months, that both Putin and Trump will conclude that he needs to be removed for a deal to be made. NATO membership of Ukraine is a joke and cannot happen for any deal to be struck and it is telling that the West still clings to this fantasy, but explains why Zelensky is still harping on about it. At the time of writing Trump hinted to journalists that he was about to meet with Zelensky so we should estimate that this will be the ‘either piss or get off the pot’ moment where all diplomatic endearment will be put aside. Trump will tell him the plan and tell him there and then, you’re either with it or you’re out. As easily as the Obama and Biden administrations ushered Zelensky and his predecessor into power, Trump will prove that he can counter the move. Watch very closely in the coming weeks for top aides of Zelensky to be fired, but who in reality have resigned. Trump’s specialty for years in NYC getting deals done was to threaten his competitors with seducing their wives. Many gave into this tactic. Almost certainly Trump’s people will be working on Zelensky’s entourage who might wipe him out financially with higher payoffs – if he chooses to stay. But will he stay?

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... aine-plan/

******

Brief report from the front, February 10, 2025

The Russian Armed Forces have gained favorable positions for attacks in the direction of Malinovka. Report by Marat Khairullin with illustrations by Mikhail Popov.
Zinderneuf
Feb 10, 2025

Image
ЛБС 17.9.2024=Line of Combat Contact September 17th, 2024. ЛБС 02.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 2nd, 2025. Участки Активность=Area of Activity.

On the Chasov Yar front, units of the "South" group liberated the settlement of Orekhovo-Vasilyevka on February 9th. The Russian Army continues its offensive across the entire front. In Chasov Yar itself, clashes persist in the area of the high-rise buildings. Our forces have achieved minor successes here despite enemy resistance.

Image
ЛБС 17.9.2024=Line of Combat Contact September 17th, 2024.

Assault operations are underway in the direction of the Shevchenko neighborhood and Workshop No. 2, while the remaining part of the forested area is being cleared. In the southern part of the front, Russian Armed Forces are improving their positions south of the Stupochky tract. Overall activity in the area has slightly decreased in recent days, partly due to troop regrouping.

Image
ЛБС 16.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 16th, 2025. Зона Продвижения=Zone of advancement.

On the right flank of the Pokrovsk front, Russian fighters managed to secure positions on the territory of a farm located near the road interchange on the Pokrovsk-Konstantinovka (Kostyantynivka) highway, gaining advantageous positions for attacks along this route and, most importantly, in the direction of the settlement of Malinovka (Malynivka).

Image
ЛБС 31.10.2024=Line of Combat Contact October 31st, 2024. ЛБС 30.11.2024=Line of Combat Contact November 30th, 2024. ЛБС 01.01.2025=Line of Combat Contact January 1st, 2025. Зона Продвижения=Zone of advancement.

On the left flank, fierce battles for the settlement of Udachnoe continue. Russian Armed Forces units have occupied the trees lines to the south, expanding the area for launching attacks and increasing pressure on the settlement. In Uspenovka (not labeled on the map, but it is just west of Novoaleksandrovka, top center of the map), the enemy was pushed back to the western outskirts of the village, and our forces began advancing toward Novoaleksandrovka (Novooleksandrivka), probing the enemy's defenses there.

South of Nadezhdovka (Nadiivka), forward groups are operating in the direction of Preobrazhenka. Enemy positions in the settlement of Zaporozhye are also being pressured, with clashes shifting to its central part.

In Andreevka, having secured positions in the center and gained the ability to accumulate forces there, our fighters are advancing on the western part of the settlement.

Similarly, forces are being accumulated in the settlement of Dachnoe. It is likely that the western outskirts will soon be cleared of enemy presence.

Russian Armed Forces units continue maneuvers in the areas of Konstantinopol (Kostyantynopil) and Razliv (Razlyv) to create a tactical encirclement of Ukrainian Armed Forces units, which will increase pressure on them and secure more advantageous positions for further advances.

https://maratkhairullin.substack.com/p/ ... bruary-006

******

Ukraine may become Russia, it may not become Russia, but it will have to pay
February 11, 15:35

Image

Ukraine may become Russia, it may not become Russia, but it will have to pay

US President Donald Trump said in an interview with Fox News that Ukraine should guarantee the safety of American investments, as it may one day "become Russia." According to him, Ukrainian soil has significant reserves of rare earth metals, oil and gas, and the United States, which has already invested hundreds of billions of dollars in the country, would like to get their equivalent back.

"I want our money to be safe. Because we spend hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars. They may make a deal, they may not make a deal. They may become Russia someday. They may not become Russia," the president said (quoted from ).

Donald Trump noted that Washington has allocated more than $300 billion to Ukraine, while Europe has allocated about $100 billion. Now he intends to return these funds. "I told them I wanted the equivalent of $500 billion in rare earth metals, and they essentially agreed to do it. So at least we won't feel stupid. Otherwise, we are stupid," the president stated.

Last week, Donald Trump said he planned to sign an agreement with Kiev that would pay for American aid with rare earth metals. In response, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he was ready to make a deal in exchange for security guarantees.

According to estimates by the Ukrainian magazine Forbes, as of April 2023, the total value of Ukraine's mineral resources is approximately $15 trillion. At the same time, more than 70% of the mineral reserves are in the DPR and LPR, which became part of Russia, as well as in the Dnipropetrovsk region.

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/7496815 - zinc

1. You invest in a network of grant eaters for a couple of billion dollars + sponsor neo-Nazis.
2. You organize a coup d'etat and bring neo-Nazis to power.
3. You unleash a civil war and establish a Nazi dictatorship.
4. You sponsor this war by making money from arms sales.
5. You demand payment for arms deliveries by transferring all the mineral resources to yourself.

As a result of the operation - the country is captured by neo-Nazis, who have transferred the mineral resources of the captured country to you.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9664393.html

(All the more reason to regain all of Novorossiya and leave the US capitalists to suck on it.)

Lost 80% of budget after USAID closure
February 11, 17:05

Image

Lost 80% of budget after USAID closure

A specific example of USAID's work. A certain Babinets complains that American grants made up 80% of the budget, and only $500 in donations were collected. Now let's read what kind of media outlet this is.

Investigation. Info is an independent Ukrainian investigative journalism agency specializing in investigating corruption in government bodies and high-profile criminal offenses. It was created in 2012 by Dmytro Gnap and Anna Babinets.

From 2014 to 2017, the editorial board produced a weekly television program of investigative journalism that aired on two national TV channels, UA: Perviy and 24 Kanal, as well as on the Internet TV channel Public Television. Since 2018, the format is "Investigation. Info " changed, and the team began to create full-length documentaries (4 per year) and text investigations.

This is how USAID worked. For a long time, for years and decades. And they had thousands and thousands of such media. Including in Russia.

https://t.me/SergeyKolyasnikov/66461 - zinc

"Independent" Ukrainian "journalism" turned out to be very dependent on American money. The population is not eager to support it at their own expense.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9664547.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Thu Feb 13, 2025 1:12 pm

Ukraine and the priorities of Trumpism
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 02/13/2025

Image

Yesterday's meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, the first in which the new US Secretary of Defense participated, was very different in its content and form from those held until now and which had served as summits to reaffirm the need to continue supporting Kiev as long as necessary . Despite the changes, the constant was that it was Washington's representative who led the way and set both the agenda and the outcome. The day began with the words of NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who insisted on the need to increase military spending by member countries and gave the summer as a deadline to reach the 2% demanded until now by the Alliance, a proposal that is insufficient in the eyes of the Pentagon. "President Trump has asked for 5% and I agree," he said to his European allies, whom he asks to double their defense spending. “Increasing the commitment to one’s own security is a step forward for the future,” he concluded, with an idea slightly different from the one currently heard in Europe, but perfectly complementary.

Just this week, Denmark, the country whose territorial integrity is being threatened by its American ally, quoted its intelligence as saying that “Russia is likely to be more willing to use military force in a regional war against one or more European NATO countries if it perceives that the Alliance is militarily weakened or politically divided.” In the face of threats, whether real or imagined (Russia is aware that an attack on NATO would be a suicidal act leading to nuclear war), there is a need to increase the commitment to defence, the demand currently being made by Donald Trump and his emissaries. The United States, of course, has the most to gain from all this, since that will be the source of much of the arms that European countries acquire in their militaristic fervour. For the first time since World War II, when the continent was the main theatre of the Cold War and it was necessary to keep an eye on allies and prevent any opening towards the Soviet Union or the Eastern bloc, Europe is no longer a priority for the United States, something that has been made clear in recent months, but that European countries have needed to hear directly from Pete Hegseth.

Donald Trump's televised Pentagon Secretary said he was "here today to say directly and unambiguously that stark strategic realities prevent the United States from focusing primarily on European security." With European countries' political and economic ties or even subordination to the United States consolidated, and without a rival capable of creating a block opposed to Washington and attracting more European countries, and far from the main stage of the current struggle between great powers - Asia-Pacific - Europe loses all interest for the White House. For decades, the US military presence in Europe has not been justified and there have been many times when the need for a European security architecture of its own has been raised, always unsuccessfully. However, the task of taking charge of security comes at a time of war. European countries are thus paying the price for not having been able or willing to create a continental security environment that would incorporate the continent's other great power, Russia, something that has been possible at various times, especially in the 1990s. Even then, with Russia at its weakest in the last century, neither the United States nor the European capitals considered it appropriate to modify the security structures to adapt them to the moment, opening the door to the senseless expansion of NATO to Russian borders, an aspect that could only lead to clashes.

The European countries were also unable to prevent the political conflict from turning into a military one and failed to stop the war in Ukraine in time by complying with the Minsk agreements and agreeing not to include the country in the Alliance, an easy promise to keep considering that two of the great powers of NATO, the United States and Germany, were opposed to accession. The pride of not showing weakness before the enemy by granting this demand and Ukraine's refusal to implement the Minsk agreements to grant limited autonomy to Donbass made the agreement impossible and Europe was condemned to conflict, a war that continued beyond 2022 due to the lack of interest of the United States and the United Kingdom in offering Ukraine the security guarantees it required from its allies.

“We must begin by recognizing that returning to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic goal,” Hegseth said in his speech. The diagnosis is obvious given the trend on the front, where despite certain attempts at a Ukrainian counterattack in the Pokrovsk area and the presence in Kursk, it is Russia that maintains the initiative. This reality has been evident even to Biden-era Pentagon officials since the beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Crimea has always been the main red line for Russia and the danger of losing control of the peninsula, base of the Black Sea Fleet and whose population showed its massive support for accession to the Russian Federation in 2014, would probably have triggered Russian nuclear doctrine, a circumstance that was never close to happening.

Ukraine and its allies chose not to negotiate at the end of 2022, the only time when, given Russia's maximum weakness, kyiv would have been able to negotiate from a position of strength, and rejected the Istanbul agreement, whose terms were more generous in the territorial aspect than what Russia will offer now. To do so, Zelensky believes he has an ace up his sleeve, the territories under Ukrainian control in the Russian region of Kursk, which, as he said in an interview, he intends to use as a bargaining chip to recover part of the lost territories. The Ukrainian president refuses to mention any in particular, arguing that they are all equally important, although it is clear that, given the difficulties in electricity production, it is obvious that one of them could be Energodar, where the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant is located, which Ukraine has attacked in the past with the intention of making it impossible for Russia to remain in the territory. Yesterday, Russia denounced attacks in the area. Moscow has also rejected any exchange of territories to recover its lost areas in Kursk.

The territorial issue, which was always easier to resolve, is still not Volodymyr Zelensky’s priority, as he has fully understood the message coming from Washington. It is even harder for the Ukrainian president to hear from the head of the Pentagon that “the United States does not believe that Ukraine’s entry into NATO is a realistic outcome of a negotiated agreement,” another piece of evidence that the previous administration preferred to hide. In response to everything, the Ukrainian president said in an interview with The Economist on February 11 that “if Ukraine is not in NATO, then Ukraine will build NATO on its own territory. That is why we need an army as big as the current Russian one. And for that we need weapons and money. And we will ask the United States for it.” Perhaps Zelensky has done the math and has come to the conclusion that, with the $500 billion that Trump is demanding in rare earths to recover his investment in Ukraine, which does not even reach half of that figure, Ukraine still has enough credit to demand many more weapons.

The US lack of interest in European security also extends to Ukraine, a conflict that Donald Trump wants to end as soon as possible and from which he hopes to obtain a significant economic benefit in the form of minerals, a plan that Volodymyr Zelensky seems willing to accept in the hope that they will be part of the security guarantees that kyiv continues to demand and the United States continues to reject. Yesterday, the same day that the first telephone call between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin was confirmed, and in which the US president insisted that it is necessary to end this war “that is killing millions”, Pete Hegseth reaffirmed Washington’s willingness not to participate in a possible peace mission in Ukraine after the ceasefire.

“A lasting peace for Ukraine must include strong security guarantees that ensure war will not start again. This must not be Minsk 3.0,” the Pentagon secretary said, making it clear that the goal is not to abandon Ukraine, but to achieve a deal that the White House considers reasonable, meets its interests and can present as a victory. And although NATO membership will not be considered viable, Hegseth opened the door to the second best option for Ukraine, that of peacekeepers on the ground. Of course, always with nuances. “Any security guarantee must be backed by capable European and non-European troops. If these troops are deployed as peacekeepers in Ukraine at some point, they should be deployed as part of a non-NATO mission. And they should not be covered by Article 5. There must also be strong international oversight of the line of contact. To be clear, as part of any security guarantee, there will be no US troops deployed in Ukraine,” the US official insisted. The US approach, which also insists that the “overwhelming majority” of weapons to be sent to Ukraine from now on must be borne by European countries, implies an armed peace in which the costs and risks would be left to the participating countries. And while it would not please Ukraine, whose president insists that he will not accept security guarantees that do not involve the United States, it would not please Russia either, aware that among those countries present in Ukraine there would undoubtedly be NATO countries such as the United Kingdom. In his role as bad cop to Trump’s good cop , Hegseth also said that “lower energy prices, combined with more effective use of energy sanctions, will help bring Russia to the negotiating table.” The United States has lost interest in Europe and Ukraine, but not to hurt Russia, which nevertheless prefers to ignore these comments and the parts of the proposal that are adverse to it in order to focus on what is important, pleasing Donald Trump, an attitude that is not at all different from the Ukrainian strategy.

https://slavyangrad.es/wp-content/uploa ... 246385.jpg

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
⚡️ The Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation on the progress of the special military operation (as of 13 February 2025)

- In the Kharkiv direction, units of the North group of forces defeated formations of three territorial defence brigades in the areas of the settlements of Liptsy and Volchansk in the Kharkiv region. The Armed Forces of Ukraine lost up to 130 servicemen, an armoured personnel carrier, six vehicles, two artillery pieces and an ammunition depot.

- Units of the West group of forces improved their tactical situation by defeating the manpower and equipment of the tank, mechanized, assault brigades, the airborne assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the territorial defence brigade in the areas of the settlements of Kutkovka, Kondrashovka, Boguslavka, Novaya Kruglyakovka, Zeleny Gai in the Kharkiv region, Novolyubovka in the Luhansk People's Republic, Kolodezi, Yampolovka and Yampol in the Donetsk People's Republic. The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 220 servicemen, a tank, five combat armored vehicles, including an M113 armored personnel carrier made in the USA, seven field artillery pieces, including three made in NATO countries. An ammunition depot was destroyed.

— The "Southern" group of forces improved the situation along the forward edge, having defeated the manpower and equipment of four mechanized, motorized infantry and two assault brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, as well as the "Foreign Legion" formations in the areas of the settlements of Nikiforovka, Zvanovka, Pereyezdnoye, Raygorodok, Vasyukovka, Privolye, Chasov Yar, Konstantinovka, Aleksandro-Shultino, Ivanopolye and Dachnoye of the Donetsk People's Republic. The enemy lost up to 155 servicemen, three pickup trucks, four field artillery pieces, including a 155-mm self-propelled artillery mount "Panzerhaubitze 2000" made in Germany, and an ammunition depot.

— Units of the Center group of forces continued to advance deep into the enemy's defense and liberated the settlement of Vodyanoye Vtoroye of the Donetsk People's Republic. They inflicted losses on the manpower and equipment of four mechanized, ranger, and airmobile brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, a territorial defense brigade, and two National Guard brigades in the areas of the settlements of Shcherbinovka, Lenina, Baranovka, Zverevo, Udachnoye, Kotlino, Nadezhdinka, and Novoandreyevka of the Donetsk People's Republic. The enemy lost up to 510 servicemen, a Leopard tank made in Germany, five armored combat vehicles, five pickups, a Vampire multiple launch rocket system combat vehicle made in the Czech Republic, and two field artillery pieces, including a 155-mm Panzerhaubitze 2000 self-propelled artillery unit.

— Units of the "East" force group improved the situation along the forward edge. They defeated formations of three mechanized, airborne assault brigades of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and two territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Konstantinopol, Bogatyr, Burlatskoye, Komar, Skudnoye and Rivnepil of the Donetsk People's Republic. The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 140 servicemen, a tank, an armored combat vehicle, eight cars and seven field artillery pieces, including a 155-mm howitzer M198 made in the USA. An ammunition depot was destroyed.

— Units of the "Dnepr" force group defeated the manpower and equipment of the coastal defense brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and three territorial defense brigades in the areas of the settlements of Novoberislav, Kazatskoye, Tokarevka and Antonovka in the Kherson region. The Ukrainian Armed Forces lost up to 70 servicemen, eight vehicles, four field artillery guns, two ammunition depots, two electronic and counter-battery warfare stations.

— Operational-tactical aviation, strike unmanned aerial vehicles, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Armed Forces groups inflicted damage on military airfield and port infrastructure facilities in Ukraine, unmanned aerial vehicle production workshops, storage sites for fuel and lubricants of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, as well as concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment in 146 districts.
https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

Recognition of crimes is not equal for all: The Western double standard for Russkoye Porechnoe and Sudzha

Lorenzo Maria Pacini

February 10, 2025

Humanitarian crimes of Ukraine’s armed forces are downplayed, while provocations and incidents are blamed on Russia as tragedies.

Once again, the West uses a double standard with Russia: humanitarian crimes of Ukraine’s armed forces are downplayed, while provocations and incidents are blamed on Russia as tragedies.

Yet another tragic event

The 352nd Infantry Unit of the Navy of the Russian Federation found a basement in the recently liberated resort of Russkoye Porechnoe filled with the corpses of innocent pensioners. They had been tied up; on their corpses were signs of torture of all kinds. The peaceful residents of Russkoye Porechnoe are just the latest, striking victims of NATO-funded Nazi-fascist terrorism. The images of the discovery are chilling: these poor people were tortured and their bodies vilified and outraged.

In Sudzha, Kurks, a school that had been turned into a detention camp for Russian prisoners within the Kursk region still in the hands of the Ukrainian army, was hit. Up to 100 people are feared to be under the rubble.

Ukrainians claim the college was allegedly hit by the Russian air force with a guided aerial bomb. Zelensky tweeted on X: “This is how Russia makes war: Sudzha, Kursk region, Russian territory, a boarding school with civilians preparing to evacuate. Russian aerial bomb. They destroyed the building even though there were dozens of civilians.”

The Russians claim, however, that the area was attacked by four HIMARS missiles from the Sumy region. The Russian argument is that the Ukrainian army is losing ground in the Russian region of Sudzha and needed to erase the traces of crimes committed there.

The use of crimes against civilians during a war as a tool to provoke the opponent is a brutal and cynical tactic adopted by various forces throughout history to destabilize the enemy, exacerbate the conflict and manipulate public opinion. And Ukraine seems to really like this strategy, which is based on the deliberate use of violence against innocent populations with the aim of gaining political, military or propaganda advantages.

One of the main purposes of this tactic is to provoke an emotional and disproportionate reaction from the opponent. Targeted attacks on civilians, bombings of residential areas, massacres or other human rights violations can prompt the enemy to respond with equally brutal actions, thus fueling a spiral of violence that makes war even more vicious. Moreover, these provocations can lead to retaliation that legitimizes in the eyes of the public further military offensives, justified as “necessary responses” to the atrocities suffered.

The other goal is to influence international perceptions of the conflict. The actors involved may exploit the narrative of war crimes to gain diplomatic support, military or economic aid. In some cases, atrocities committed are exaggerated or manipulated to blame the adversary and justify certain operations. The dissemination of images and testimonies, amplified by the media and social networks, can create pressure on foreign governments to take a stand or impose sanctions.

The use of violence against civilians can also aim to demoralize the enemy, breaking their will to fight. If a population lives in constant terror of indiscriminate attacks, it may push its government or armed forces to seek a peace agreement or truce to avoid further suffering. In this sense, terror becomes a psychological weapon aimed at undermining the opponent’s resistance.

Even some groups may use crimes against civilians as a tool to radicalize their support base, prompting the population to hate the enemy and join the struggle with greater determination, a phenomenon is particularly evident in conflicts of an ethnic, religious or ideological nature, where brutality becomes a means of consolidating internal consensus and justifying further violence.

This is where we find the double standard: in the West, Russia is always to blame and Ukraine is always a victim, no matter if that is true or not, the important thing is the anti-Russian propaganda. That same West that until 10 years ago denounced corruption, neo-Nazism, child trafficking, today defends Ukraine with a sword.

It is all about convenience, a money spin. Ukraine must be supplied with weapons and supported at any cost. The human rights that the West often cites become a side issue, or rather a tool that is invoked only when it is convenient.

But this is pure demagoguery. The human rights of the West are not the rights of the human being, they are rather the rights established and imposed by the Anglo-American axis, of a certain specific pattern of human being, and anything that goes outside that pattern must be destroyed.

Ruskoye Porechnoe and Sudzha will probably not be heard from again for a long time. The mechanism is always the same: the news comes out, Russia is blamed, then as it becomes clear that Russia had nothing to do with it, that’s when the news is neither corrected nor disproved, and so in the collective imagination the idea that Russia is a monster ready for the worst initiatives crystallizes.

Do we all remember what was said in the Western media about, for example, Bucha, or for flight MH17? Whole weeks of hating the Russians, accusing the Kremlin of criminal choices, invoking international courts and trying to stifle any contrary opinion. When, then, the truth emerged, not a single newspaper page or TV interview was devoted to debunking the Ukrainian fake news. Correct, no?

The Human Rights Council of Russia sent abroad a new collection of documents regarding crimes committed by the Ukrainian Armed Forces and nationalist battalions against Russian servicemen and civilians.

It emerged that the Ukrainian military continues to intensify attacks against peaceful towns and settlements, making extensive use of NATO-supplied weapons. Materials were also collected by the Russians and partners so that they can be analyzed and aid in battle decision-making.

The Council called for pressure to be brought to bear on the Ukrainian authorities internationally to end the gross human rights violations

The collection compiled by the Council’s experts includes evidence of crimes committed between September 1 and October 31, 2024 in the regions of Donetsk People’s Republic, Lugansk People’s Republic, and Bryansk Oblast. In addition, it contains the book War Crimes of the Kiev Regime. Materials of the International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis in 2023-2024, written by Russian Federation Public Chamber member Maxim Grigoriev and State Duma deputy Dmitry Sablin.

Since the spring of 2022, the Russian Council has regularly sent these kinds of materials to about 2,000 recipients, including international organizations, diplomatic missions, politicians, journalists, and human rights activists.

Ukraine attempts to break through, but fails

Thanks to the offensive operations conducted with determination by the units of the 1st, 9th and 132nd Guard Motorized Rifle Brigade belonging to the 51st Army, together with the “Veterans” volunteer formation of the “Center” group of forces, the city of Dzerzhinsk (Toretsk), located in the Donetsk People’s Republic, was liberated. The news was reported by the Ministry of Defense.

As the Ukrainian Armed Forces disperse their men and Western-made equipment in forested areas in an attempt to launch another dead-end counteroffensive in the Kursk region, the Russian military continues to liberate the towns. Toretsk (Dzerzhinsk) proved to be a challenging target for Russian troops. Initially, the siege was started from the east, through Pivnichny (Kirov) and Pivdenny (Leninsky). Later, the advance continued from the south and southwest, aiming toward New York (Novgorod). This morning, the Defense Ministry confirmed the capture of the northern suburb of Druzhba. According to the latest update, the “Center” group has eliminated the last pockets of resistance near the Toretskaya mine, gaining complete control of the town.

Dzerzhinsk represents a strategic access point to the northern part of the DPR, still under Kiev’s control, where the vast Konstantinovka – Druzhkovka – Kramatorsk – Slavyansk urban agglomeration is located, still in enemy hands. Part of the Russian forces are advancing toward Konstantinovka from the east, passing through Chasov Yar. When the two groups reunite, the decisive battle for the Donbass will begin. The main confrontation for control of the region has yet to take place.

However, current developments already paint a clear picture. The city of Gorlovka, with a population of 250,000, which the enemy began systematically striking after being pushed back from Donetsk, will finally benefit from some relief. The “Himars” and “Caesar” artillery systems may still threaten it, but at present Ukrainian forces have limited stocks of these weapons. However, it cannot be ruled out that the enemy will choose, as in the past, to use them to target the civilian population.

Keep in mind that, since February 2024, Russian forces have liberated the following towns: Avdeevka, Novogrodovka, Ugledar, Selidovo, Krasnogorovka, Ukrainsk, Gornyak, Kurakhovo, and the urban settlement of Velyka Novosyolka.

The number of villages and smaller towns recaptured is counted in the dozens. Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces took control of the small town of Sudzha, with a population of about 5,000, and surrounding localities, but completely lost the Vremyevsk salient, gained during the counteroffensive in the summer and fall of 2023.

To date, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the operation aimed at neutralizing AFU units in the territory of the Kursk region.

Force Group North faced formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, including one armored brigade, one heavy mechanized brigade, four mechanized brigades, two airborne assault brigades, one infantry brigade and three territorial defense brigades. The fighting was concentrated in the vicinity of Gogolevka, Zaoleshenka, Kazachya Loknya, Kolmakov, Lebedevka, Malaya Loknya, Mirny, Nikolsky, Sverdlykovo, Sudzha, and Yuzhny, where an AFU counterattack was repulsed.

Tactical and operational aviation, along with artillery, inflicted significant losses on the enemy in terms of men and military assets. Fighting developed near Viktorovka, Guyevo, Dmitryukov, Zamostye, Pervy Knyazhy, Kositsa, Kruglenkoye, Kurilovka, Loknya, Malaya Loknya, Martynovka, Makhnovka, Melovoy, Novaya Sorochina, Rubanshchina, Staraya Sorochina, Cherkasskoye Porechnoye, as well as in the localities of Basovka, Belovody, Veselovka, Zhuravka, Yunakovka and Yablonovka, located in the Sumy region.

Over the past few days, the AFU has suffered losses of more than 320 soldiers, as well as two tanks, three infantry fighting vehicles, a U.S.-made Bradley fighting vehicle, four armored troop carriers, 13 armored fighting vehicles, 11 motorized vehicles, six artillery guns, five mortars, two BM-21 Grad and BM-27 Uragan multiple rocket launchers, a German-made Pionierpanzer 2, and three UAV command posts.

Since the start of operations in the Kursk direction, AFU losses total more than 58,550 soldiers, 350 tanks, 254 infantry fighting vehicles, 201 armored troop carriers, 1,810 armored fighting vehicles, 1. 864 motorized vehicles, 418 artillery pieces, 48 MLRS launchers, including 13 HIMARS and six U.S.-made MLRS systems, 18 anti-aircraft missile launchers, eight ammunition transport and loading vehicles, 106 electronic warfare stations, 15 artillery counter radar, five air defense radars, 38 engineering units and other equipment. These include 18 obstacle removal vehicles, one UR-77 demining vehicle, one bridge launcher, nine armored recovery vehicles and one mobile command vehicle.

The operation to neutralize the AFUs is still ongoing.

It is clear and obvious that with such a picture, the Ukrainian armed forces have no hope. Falling back on war crimes against civilians is a very low-level gesture, perhaps the last resort they have before being forced into unconditional surrender. The martyrs of Russkoye Porechnoe and Sudzha are waiting to be redeemed with final victory.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... nd-sudzha/

******

Waiting for the Munich Security Conference to Open: What ‘peace plan’ is Team Trump bringing?

Has the lifting of U.S. pressure of state censorship on social media and video platforms like youtube since Donald Trump’s inauguration made a difference in what we see and hear on the internet? My intuitive judgment says ‘yes.’ Day by day, I am struck by the proliferation of disinformation and fake news now coming from online broadcasters in the alternative media as ‘yellow press’ sensationalism rises for the sake of attracting an audience and signing up paying sponsors. Platforms may change with technology, but human instincts remain the same. By curious coincidence, this is happening at the very moment when lying and propagandistic mainstream media like The New York Times and The Financial Times have cooled to the notion of Ukraine dealing a strategic defeat on Russia while retaking all of its territories lost since 2014 and are presenting more fact-based reporting on the daily setbacks of the Ukrainian forces and the approaching Russian victory.

A case in point about rumor mongering was delivered to my inbox a day ago by friends in Brussels who sent me the link to a just released podcast by Clayton Morris (Redacted) claiming to know the contents of the peace plan Trump’s team will present at the Munich Security Conference that opens in two days. This plan supposedly will provide for joint Russian-Ukrainian control of the contested Eastern Ukraine regions of Novaya Rossiya now held by Russian troops, while Ukraine’s entry into the European Union is foreseen. It will provide for an immediate cessation of hostilities. Moscow will be incentivized to agree by the release of their frozen assets to Russian oligarchs. Oh, yes, and at the start of a cease fire, the United States would halt all further arms deliveries to Kiev.

Who knows? Perhaps such an improbable plan is among the papers that General Kellogg, Trump’s emissary to Ukraine and Russia, Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are carrying with them to Munich. The notion that Putin can be moved to genuflect before Washington’s strong man by the self-serving dictates from his own Russian oligarchs is so utterly ignorant of Russian realities that it could easily have been put forward by Trump’s staff, who seem to be as poorly informed about what makes Russia tick as were Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken in the Biden administration.

We can be left guessing, because Trump himself in his latest chats with Fox News reporters yesterday declared that he has made great progress towards a peace in the past week. He said he has spoken by telephone to Putin. He still hopes to bring together Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky for face-to-face negotiations.

Note that so far Donald Trump’s approach to negotiating an end to the Russia-Ukraine war has exactly the same elements of bravado, bullying, hubris as we see in all of his other opening moves on the international front, such as his threats of 25% tariffs against Mexico and Canada, his demand that Denmark ‘sell’ Greenland to the USA and his imposition of what are intended to be crushing new sanctions on Iran so as to open talks on a comprehensive settlement of decades long confrontation from what Americans perceive as ‘a position of strength.’

Note also, that in the case of Iran, Trump’s tactics have so far failed completely. A week ago, the country’s Supreme Leader Ali Khameini, flatly rejected entering into negotiations with Trump, saying that the Americans were not trustworthy and that Trump’s opening moves were ‘undignified.’

Exactly the same new crushing sanctions were imposed by Trump on Russia to show off his muscle to American admirers: namely sanctions directed against the so-called shadow fleet of oil tankers that Russia, like Iran, has assembled to take the delivery of oil to export markets entirely in its own hands, including provision of insurance coverage for the tankers. The intention of Trump in both instances is to reduce the exports and foreign currency earnings of both countries to nil.

All of the optimism coming from the Trump camp that it holds the high cards in relations with Russia flies in the face of the statements made yesterday afternoon by Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov that relations with the USA “are at the breaking point.” The war will end, said Ryabkov, only when the conditions set down by Vladimir Putin in June 2023 are satisfied. These conditions include the withdrawal of all Ukrainian military forces from the 4 Eastern Ukrainian regions that have been formally integrated into the Russian Federation, disavowal by Kiev on its hopes to enter the NATO alliance together with acceptance of neutral status without the presence of any foreign military personnel or installations on its territory. Let us remember that Ryabkov is the same official who announced in December 2021 Russia’s ultimatum to the USA calling for return of NATO to its borders of 1997, that is to say, before the multiple expansion waves that took in the former Warsaw Pact countries and the Baltic States.

Yesterday, Ryabkov also said that there are no prospects presently for successful discussions with the United States about limitations on medium range ground-based missiles or other items on the agenda in regulating strategic stability. Needless to say, Ryabkov’s very depressing message is not being reported by Western media. No one wants to spoil the party about to open in Munich.

When we look at the attendance list for the Munich conference, everyone seems to be present…except the Russians. What does the American delegation headed by the number two (vice president) and number three (secretary of state) officials in the U.S. federal government expect to achieve other than to ‘confer’ with its European allies who are in fact just vassals who will do whatever Washington tells them to do. Of course, Volodymyr Zalensky will also be in attendance, though here again, he is just dead weight on the talks since his opinion counts for nothing.

*****

To my regret, yesterday afternoon I participated in a four-way panel discussion of the latest issues in the Russia-Ukraine war hosted by the Indian global broadcaster NewsX. My fellow panelists included one professor from a university in Kiev, who appeared in two earlier NewsX programs where I was present. He proved yet again that he lives in a parallel world, that he cares not at all about the 57,000 compatriots who have been killed or severely maimed in the Kursk region of Russia; all that counts is that whatever land in Kursk the Ukrainians may hold will be a negotiating point when a deal is done to end the war. Nor does this Ukrainian professor have any interest in the daily loss of men and territory on the Donbas front, where Ukrainian lines are crumbling. His only interest is to insist that other panelists, first of all myself, concede that Russia is the aggressor and that the Ukrainians are fighting for their freedom.

Then there were two new American panelists who seem to have advisory positions to the U.S. government in think tanks, both of them utterly ignorant about Russia. I took my reading on them while we were all in the Zoom ‘waiting room’ prior to going on air and I overheard their little chat among themselves. One said that he is about to travel to Israel and Jordan, which he will be visiting for the first time. His friend assured him that he would have a great time visiting these beautiful countries. This was proof positive that both gentlemen suffer from incurable hubris and live in a bubble of the post-factual world. What they had to say about the Ukraine war ending was perfectly aligned: Trump has to really step up the pressure on Russia, show them that he can destroy their economy and send new weapons to Ukraine that have been held back till now to assure Ukrainian victory. On air, I succeeded in countering this foolishness, saying that even if Biden was senile, those who actually were responsible for foreign policy, Sullivan and Blinken, had already applied maximum pressure on Russia, beyond which they rightly understood that Russia would declare war on the States.

I do take credit for landing one punch against the hosts and fellow panelists with regard to another subject that has captured the imagination of Western media: Trump’s announcement that the United States should recover some of the 350 billion dollars in aid it has given to Ukraine these past three years by taking possession of the rare earth deposits and other mineral wealth of Ukraine. The NewsX producers wanted to discuss this from the standpoint of its appropriateness under international law. My response was on a different level: the 13 trillion dollars in mineral wealth said to lie underground in Ukraine just waiting for American investors and mining companies is a total fiction that has been rolled out by the Trump people to distract the world from America’s descending the exit ramp on Ukraine and leaving the mess to the Europeans, as we will see in a day when the British assume leadership of the Ramstein group of Ukraine’s military backers.

De facto, Ukraine is not an undiscovered island somewhere on the world ocean. It was part of the Soviet Union, which was always a major world power in extractive industries. The fact that very little of the wealth in metallic ores (tungsten) has been commercially exploited in Ukraine has good reasons behind it: namely the Ukrainian deposits are found in rock formations that are very difficult and expensive to mine commercially.

When the video link to yesterday’s NewsX program is sent to me, I will post it here. My apologies to the kind gentleman who prepares transcripts of my video appearances. Please be assured that this is the last NewsX propaganda exercise into which I will be lured

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2025/02/11/ ... -bringing/

******

Trump Tells Ukrainian War Party That The Game Is Up

Today the Trump administration told the Ukraine war party that their game is finally up. Everything it had hoped for is out of reach:

Hegseth Says Return to Ukraine’s Pre-2014 Borders Is ‘Unrealistic’ (archived) - New York Times, Feb 12 2025

A return to Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “an unrealistic objective” and an “illusionary goal” in the peace settlement between Ukraine and Russia that President Trump wants to accomplish, the U.S. Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, said on Wednesday at a meeting of countries supporting Ukraine.
...
Mr. Trump, he added, does not support Ukraine’s membership in NATO as part of a realistic peace plan.
After a settlement, “a durable peace for Ukraine must include robust security guarantees to ensure that the war will not begin again,” but that would be the responsibility, he said, of European and non-European troops in a “non-NATO mission” unprotected by NATO’s Article Five commitment to collective defense.

No American troops will be deployed to Ukraine, he said, and Europe should provide “the overwhelming share of future lethal and nonlethal aid to Ukraine.”


Just yesterday Zelenski claimed that Europe cannot guarantee Ukraine’s security without the US. He is right with that. Over the last years Russia's military power has tripled. No alliance of current European armies could withstand its power should a conflict over Ukraine reignite.

There is only one party that can and is willing to give Ukraine real security guarantees.

That is of course, as I have written 20 months ago, Russia:

A main question for Ukraine since it became an independent state was who or what could potentially guarantee its security.
...
The Ukraine is now obviously losing the war. It will soon need to sign a capitulation like ceasefire agreement with Russia.
But who or what can guarantee that any such agreement will be held up?
...
There will be no NATO membership or NATO security guarantees for Ukraine, neither now nor ever.

A direct full security guarantee from Washington to Kiev is also impossible. It would create a high likelihood of a direct war between the U.S. and Russia which would soon become nuclear. The U.S. will not want to risk that.
...
There is only one country in the world that can guarantee peace in Ukraine and the security of its borders. That country is Russia!

But any such guarantee will of course come with conditions attached to it. Either Ukraine will accept those or it will never be secure from outer interference.

That is simply a fact of life Ukraine has had to, and will have to live with.


This was all so very obvious.

Why did it take so long for realism to come to the fore?

Posted by b on February 12, 2025 at 17:18 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/02/t ... .html#more

******

Soldiers who stormed Dzerzhinsk ask to return Iron Felix to Lubyanka
February 11, 19:17

Image

Soldiers who stormed Dzerzhinsk ask to return Iron Felix to Lubyanka

The fighters who took part in the liberation of Dzerzhinsk (which was called Toretsk during the Ukrainian occupation and which was given its former name back after liberation) appealed to Putin with a request not to limit himself to renaming Toretsk to Dzerzhinsk, but also to return the Dzerzhinsky monument to Lubyanka.

(Video at link.)

The day will come when Iron Felix will return to Lubyanka.

P.S. The photo shows Dzerzhinsky and the Maidanites of 1991.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9664905.html

Removal of Ukrainian rags from Krasnoarmeysk
February 12, 14:08

Image

The largest Ukrainian rag in Nazi-occupied Krasnoarmeysk was removed and taken out of the city.
The front is close. Next New Year Krasnoarmeysk will be celebrating as part of Russia and there will be no place for Ukrainian rags there in any case.

(Video at link.)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9665963.html

"Russian Spy" in SBU Leadership
February 12, 15:43

Image

The SBU announced that it had detained a "Russian spy" who turned out to be the Chief of Staff of the SBU Anti-Terrorist Center, Colonel Dmytro Kozyura, who is connected to Klitschko.
No evidence of Kozyura's connections to the FSB was presented, but at the same time, Colonel Kozyura's detention occurred just during the period of the latest attack by Zelensky's gang on Klitschko's gang, who has long been trying to oust him from the post of Gauleiter of Kiev

Image

The head of the SBU publicly posed with a detained colonel who worked in his department.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9666197.html

Google Translator

******

Ukrainian "Drone Line" - what the Ukrainian project will look like in practice
February 11, 2025
Rybar

Image

Recently, Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced the launch of the " Drone Line " project. According to Umerov, the goal is to create a defense line of the most trained drone units, which will include five formations for now.

Who will enter and what is the point?

*20th separate regiment "K-2"

*429th Regiment "Achilles"

*427th Regiment "RAROG"

*414 Brigade "Birds of Madyar"

*Regiment "Phoenix" (brigade "Revenge" of the State Border Service of Ukraine)

This will allow, as Umerov said, “to create a zone 10-15 km deep where the enemy will not be able to move without losses, to provide the infantry with constant air support and cover, to identify and destroy targets before they get close to our positions . ”

They operate in different directions, but their positioning is conditional. The same "Birds of Madyar" were in the Kherson direction , they were also in the Kursk region , now they are in Pokrovsk . "K-2" is noted in the Seversk direction , and so on. But they change periodically, and sometimes they send conditional companies.

You can laugh a lot about the state of the Ukrainian troops and the difficult situation at the front, but the unmanned sphere is something that the so-called Ukraine has developed and continues to develop with Western assistance. Drones have replaced the Ukrainian Armed Forces' artillery and missiles, as well as ships at sea.

The production of the simplest FPV drones by the Ukrainian military-industrial complex has reached enormous values. Every day, deliveries are made in batches from one to several thousand UAVs to different units at the front, which has allowed the Ukrainian Armed Forces to compensate for the shortage of artillery and missile weapons.

The regiments and brigade specified in the project are the most hyped units that have existed for a long time and receive priority manning. Of course, beautiful PR helped them in many ways, but at the front they are noted and create certain problems.

The point of the publication is that you shouldn't underestimate the enemy , because he doesn't stand still. So far, this line includes five formations, and their number will increase, which will threaten our immediate rear on the front line.

https://rybar.ru/ukrainskaya-liniya-dro ... ij-proekt/

Ukrainian "Drone Line" - The situation on the example of Zaporizhia region
February 12, 2025
Rybar

Image

A good example of the potential appearance of the "Drone Line" - a project to create a line of defense from the most trained drone units - is the situation in the Zaporizhia region . The Ukrainian Armed Forces are not advancing there, and if they try, they are unsuccessful and suffer heavy losses.

But FPV drones fly almost across the entire width of the front. And in the last two months, the quantitative indicators have increased, as has the depth of strikes. The targets are, according to the classics, cars and forward positions.

Their activity has increased especially since mid-January, when drones began to be detected quite far from the front line. A video of an attempted strike on the Melitopol-Vasilyevka highway has already flown around the Internet.

If you look at the map, you can see that drones are increasingly flying to a depth of up to 30 km , which indicates an increase in their tactical and technical characteristics, which allow them to strike at a greater distance.

It is for this reason that the so-called Ukraine is now engaged in restructuring the armed forces, focusing on the modernization of unmanned troops, since they are almost the main striking force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the moment.

The Ukrainian Armed Forces used drones to compensate for their lack of artillery, ammunition for which is now harder to find. And this kind of increased activity in the Zaporizhia region looks rather suspicious. Especially in the Kamensk area .

But, returning to UAVs, I would very much like to see a similar development in this area on our side, since the enemy is developing, and in the position of catching up, you will always be second.

https://rybar.ru/ukrainskaya-liniya-dro ... j-oblasti/

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14425
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:36 pm

A wave of pessimism
Posted by @nsanzo ⋅ 02/14/2025

Image

“Keep calm. Hasty emotions are unnecessary today,” wrote yesterday Mijailo Podolyak, one of the most belligerent members of the Ukrainian government, reacting to the wave of pessimism and, at times, hysteria that spread across the European continent throughout the day yesterday, focusing on analyzing the implications of the telephone conversation between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump and the subsequent statements by the president of the United States. “The Trump-Putin conversation reduces tension, but at the expense of Ukraine,” stated the British BBC before the political spin managed to create a continental crisis from an initial conversation whose only agreement is to continue talking. Because despite the adjectives that are being used to describe the contact between the two presidents or the way in which it occurred, the result of the call was the mutual reaffirmation of the importance of peace and the implementation of the mechanisms to schedule a meeting between the two leaders, which will presumably be in Saudi Arabia, and begin a negotiation process.

According to the Kremlin, there are no specific agreements on Trump's visit to Russia, the negotiating teams have not been formed and the conversation did not address the issue of lifting sanctions against Russia or the recognition of Crimea and Sevastopol, which have been Russian for almost eleven years, or Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye. In other words, these issues are left for future negotiations and remain tools with which the United States can put pressure on Russia. The territorial issue does not seem to be a priority for Donald Trump and his team, who, on the contrary, have shown interest in using coercive measures to favour Ukraine and, above all, themselves. This is the case of the repeated statements by Mike Waltz, Keith Kellogg or Donald Trump himself on sanctions against Russian oil, a competitor of American oil in the market and one of the main sources of financing for the Russian state. Making the price of crude oil fall abruptly has been one of the ways in which the American president has wanted to undermine Russia's ability to continue fighting. And as the Treasury Secretary confirmed in kyiv, reaffirming what Donald Trump had already said, the United States will continue to finance Ukraine, but in exchange for a “new economic agreement” that the Ukrainian government has already received and that Zelensky has publicly promised to review quickly so that it can be signed as soon as possible.

Perhaps the most surprising part of all that has happened in the last few hours is the perplexity with which those who should have understood what the situation on the ground is and, above all, what the intentions of the person who currently holds power in the country to which they have subordinated their foreign policy have reacted. Since he began his campaign last year, Donald Trump rejected the idea of ​​continuing the war in the way it was being managed by Joe Biden and has repeatedly advocated rapid negotiation to achieve an immediate resolution to the conflict. And as the European countries themselves have pointed out, Trump's position towards NATO has always been more transactional than ideological and there has been no special emphasis on endless enlargement, the official policy of the Alliance since the 1990s. Trump has not denied his intention to engage in direct dialogue with Vladimir Putin. But, even so, the European countries did not expect from Donald Trump the brutal realism with which he surprised them on Wednesday.

On the one hand, the Republican administration was accused of sacrificing its best cards in advance for a negotiation, something that has been understood as a way of favouring Russia and weakening Ukraine. On Wednesday, in front of European allies and the press, Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly stated what has been evident since the war began: that Ukraine's accession to NATO is not an outcome that can be expected from a negotiation. Denying reality has been one of the tools with which European countries, the Biden administration, the Ukrainian government and its friendly press have managed to create a discourse in which NATO was not the main reason for this war - it was all the result of Vladimir Putin's territorial ambitions - but that it should be the solution. It is possible that European countries did not expect realism from the Trump administration, but it has always been clear that Russia was not going to accept Ukraine's accession to the Alliance as part of any agreement if it was not militarily defeated. That leads to the second card that Hegseth's speech supposedly removed from the negotiation, the territorial question.

“We are ready to increase our support for Ukraine,” said the Weimar+ statement signed by the foreign ministers of France, Germany, Poland, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom, as well as Kaja Kallas, the EU’s diplomat. While initially granting the US wish that European countries bear the “overwhelming” cost of financing Ukraine, the group added that it is committed to “its independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russia’s war of aggression.” The aim, it continued, is “to continue supporting Ukraine until a just, comprehensive and lasting peace is achieved” and that “our common goal must be to put Ukraine in a position of strength.” Since the Russian invasion, European countries and the US Democratic administration have based their discourse on presenting Euro-Atlantic unity as one of the main sources of Ukraine’s strength in the face of the weakness of Russian isolation. Ukraine, too, has wanted to believe that time is on its side, since the resources of the bloc that supports it, NATO, far outnumber those of Russia, a virtually decisive factor in a war of attrition. However, neither Kiev has these resources nor has time managed to put Ukraine in a position in which it is foreseeable that it will achieve a position of strength in the short, medium and even long term. The idea of ​​continuing to support Ukraine – that is, arming its army and supporting its state – as long as necessary , until it achieves a position of strength, is the perfect recipe for eternal war.

From this point of view, a bad war is preferable to a bad peace, and any mention of negotiations, even one where the outcome is more than uncertain, is a threat, a stab in the back. “No NATO membership, no boots on the ground? It sounds like abandoning Ukraine. Delegates are flying to Munich not to negotiate, but to deliver to Zelensky the bad news. If this agreement produces a piece of paper that guarantees peace for our time, we should call it Munich 2,” wrote, for example, Gabrielius Landsbergis, who as a former minister (of foreign affairs of Lithuania) could afford to go further than his colleagues currently in office, but who reflected the bewilderment and rejection of a very significant part of the European political class and the Ukrainian establishment . “Even before President Volodymyr Zelensky arrives at the Munich Security Conference tomorrow to renew his defense of Ukraine’s independence from the US, his country’s fate seems sealed,” Bloomberg concluded , adhering to the hypothesis of Ukraine’s abandonment. “Why are we giving them everything they want even before negotiations have begun? That is the policy of appeasement. It has never worked,” said Kaja Kallas, in charge of European diplomacy, yesterday, adding that “any agreement behind our backs will fail, because it needs Europe and Ukraine to implement it.” “Without us at the table, they can agree on anything, but it will fail, simply because there will be no implementation. It will not work. It will not stop the killing,” he continued, opening the door to European and Ukrainian rejection of an agreement between the two countries with decision-making power, Russia and the United States. Unlike its opponent, Ukraine depends on third parties, especially Washington, to continue fighting, a decision it cannot make independently but taking into account the position of its suppliers. If the main enemy retreats, his chances of staying in the battle are greatly reduced.

Despite European pessimism, the Ukrainian government is trying to put on a brave face, camouflage the blow or even deny reality. “The real success of American foreign policy (and, of course, of President Trump himself), as well as that of any other global political actor, will not be determined solely by the desire to end the war quickly. After all, it could have been done yesterday with the terms of Russia’s ultimatum, but that would have been meaningless,” wrote Miajailo Podolyak, appealing to “terms that are rational, reasonable at this stage of war, strategically sound and economically justified” on which he believes the “international reputation” of the United States depends.

Zelensky, for his part, tried to balance the tougher stance with openness to Donald Trump. “I say it very clearly,” he insisted, in the same vein as the Weimar+ statement, “any bilateral negotiations on Ukraine without us, we will not accept.” Despite the apparent rejection of the American approach, the Ukrainian president described the conversation he had with Donald Trump after the phone call between the presidents of Russia and the United States as “really good.” Zelensky insisted that his American counterpart, to whom he conveyed that he did not trust Vladimir Putin, understood his position and was able to see what Ukraine’s wishes were.

Despite the reality on the ground and the unequivocal and unambiguous statement by the United States on Ukraine's Atlantic prospects in the coming years, part of the Ukrainian government is refusing to accept the facts. In the division of tasks between those who have called for calm and those who reject any agreement, Minister Umerov has played the most naive role. "Ukraine wants to be and will be a NATO country," said the Minister of Defence. Maintaining the morale of the population, even if it is based on false hopes that will not be fulfilled in the coming years, has always been an important part of the Ukrainian discourse. Until now, the countries of the European Union and the United States have also joined in. Positions have changed rapidly and yesterday Mark Rutte stated in a press conference that the Alliance had never promised Ukraine membership as part of a peace agreement. Apart from Umerov, only Chrystia Freeland, a candidate to replace Justin Trudeau at the head of the Liberal Party and the Canadian government, dared yesterday to contradict the United States and present NATO as Ukraine's destiny. "Ukraine must be a full member of NATO," she declared, displaying a position in which she was not so alone until a few days ago. For the past eleven years, this has also been the discourse of the European Union, which is now focused solely on obtaining a seat at the negotiating table that it has tried so hard to avoid.

https://slavyangrad.es/2025/02/14/una-ola-de-pesimismo/

Google Translator

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
Chronicle of strikes on the territory of Ukraine on February 13-14, 2025

Yesterday, day and night, the Aerospace Forces and missile forces struck targets in the Donbas, in the Sumy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhia, Kherson regions (the entire spectrum of weapons), in Odessa (OTRK) and Yuzhne in the Odessa region (Kh-59 / Kh-31), Novomoskovsk in the Dnipropetrovsk region, Kiev, Bogodukhov and Boryspil in the Kiev region, Svitlovodsk in the Kirovograd region, Poltava, Cherkassy and Starokostiantyniv (Gerani / Gerbera).


***

Forwarded from
GRIGORIEV
4:06
3:57

🔴 Testimonies of those who returned from captivity about the atrocities of Ukrainian neo-Nazis.

Our International Public Tribunal on the Crimes of Ukrainian Neo-Nazis (chaired by M. S. Grigoriev) of civil society representatives from 32 countries continues to collect evidence of the crimes of the Kiev regime.

View previous testimonies Part 1 Part 2. Russian serviceman with the call sign "Krasnodar": "They handed me and other prisoners over to "Aidar". Along the way, they constantly stopped us, pulled us out of the car, put us on our knees, wrapped our heads in tape and brutally beat us with bats. After that, they threw us back into the car like sacks. They spoke Russian . In Kharkov, before the pre-trial detention center, they took us to the hospital. I asked for validol, the Ukrainian female doctor did not give me the pill, she said: "you will endure it." After Kharkov, they sent us to the concentration camp "West-1". When they handed us over, they said: "You have come to the Banderites." I spent all 19 months there, where they considered themselves "children of Bandera". The entire territory of the concentration camp was covered with Nazi symbols - huge portraits of Bandera and Shukhevych, OUN-UPA slogans, swastikas and symbols of the SS divisions. On the walls of the barracks hung the "Wolfsangel" signs - the emblem of the 2nd SS Panzer Division "Das Reich", which is used by "Azov". "Azovites" did not hide their views - they wore the symbols of the SS divisions on their chevrons." #internationalpublictribunal Subscribe to TG-channel MAXIM GRIGOREV

***

Forwarded from
War Chronicle
In which brigades are Ukrainians aged 18-24 offered to serve and why are these formations a one-way ticket.

🔺It is no longer a secret that there are no rear brigades on the list for enlistment , there are only "meat" ones. But this is only half the information. If you analyze the combat path and "successes" of each formation, you can find a lot of interesting things.

Let's start in order.

▪️72nd Separate Mechanized Brigade. The "sitters" of Ugledar, whom the command kept as a human shield while the Troops brigades and other neighboring units dug in behind. As a result, Ugledar was lost, and the number of 200/300 in most battalions and companies reached 70% of the actual number. After Ugledar, Velikaya Novosyolka and a number of other villages fell largely because of the 72nd Brigade.

▪️95th Airborne Assault Brigade. Zhitomir paratroopers. One of the units that was sent to the Kursk region. In fact, a ghost brigade and a record-holder brigade in terms of irretrievable losses. Relatives of servicemen of this formation have repeatedly held rallies due to losses and the impossibility of getting back the bodies of the dead;

▪️38th Marine Brigade. Antiheroes of the Kherson region and in particular Krynok. One of the leaders in the Ukrainian Armed Forces in missing in action (read - killed) after being transferred to Vovchansk in the Kharkov region.

▪️28th Separate Mechanized Brigade. A frontline brigade stationed near Toretsk (Dzerzhinsk) with 50% of its personnel lost. Almost immediately after the start of the SVO, one of the formation's companies perished in a minefield due to the commander's order to counterattack at any cost;

▪️92nd Separate Assault Brigade. In August 2023, the brigade was renamed an assault brigade. Partly because most of the losses occurred during infantry assaults. Following the Marines of the 35th and 38th Brigades, this brigade developed the "weekly company" meme, when the composition of one or more companies changed completely over 7 days of fighting;

▪️10th Separate Assault Brigade "Edelweiss". As with the 28th Separate Brigade, the brigade's key problem is company and battalion commanders giving inadequate orders. During the 2023 counteroffensive, the brigade essentially repeated the 28th and 47th brigades' run through minefields, which is why it was almost immediately withdrawn to restore combat capability and re-staff.

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator

******

Double-Decker Special: Hysteria Ignites as Trump Throws Ukraine on the Third Rail
Meltdown in the Atlanticist sphere ensues.
Feb 12, 2025

Part two of our double-decker brings us to the maelstrom sweeping through today between Trump, Putin, and Ukraine which has sent shock waves through NATO’s Magical-Thinking Wonderland.

It began with Trump’s announcement of having finally reached Putin on the phone, which was this time confirmed by the Kremlin:

Image

This is clearly a step back rather than forward, and the desperate meaningless Putin conversation was likely the patch-up job meant to give the appearance that Trump’s big brawny peace initiative was still proceeding.

In actuality, there’s virtually nothing to talk about. Not only has Putin clearly dictated that no legal document can be signed with an illegitimate president like Zelensky—which itself puts off any “negotiations” until Zelensky is long gone—but the truth is, it’s hard to imagine any legal document being signed with the West at all. Russia has long suffered the betrayals of not only the various Minsk agreements, but endless other reneged ones in the past, from the ‘not-an-inch-eastward’ NATO understanding to the various treaties US pulled out of, as in the ABM Treaty.

Putin and other Kremlin officials have hinted at this before, but signing any long term foundational agreements with the US is folly because only four years later, another deep state neocon president can steal the election be elected and immediately bin the agreement, if only to spite his previous rival. In such an uncertain political framework, in recent years known for its erratic and schizo-level politics, how can any foundational agreement in good faith be signed?

There remain many neocons still pushing for escalation against Russia which will certainly give Putin pause, vis-a-vis the point above. US congressman Joe Wilson from today:

Image

That certainly doesn’t lend much confidence to a far-looking leader like Putin.

But there are now indications that perhaps Trump will not mind to eventually dump Ukraine entirely. His latest interview snippet evoked uproar as he outright admitted that Ukraine may end up entirely subsumed into Russia proper:

Image
https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-may ... agreement/

(Video at link.)

At the same time he again focused on the minerals, which began to quickly signal that Trump appears intent only on extracting recompense from Ukraine for the alleged hundreds of billions that the US gave them. The message seemed clear: Trump doesn’t care what happens to Ukraine as long as he gets his compensation.

This all while Zelensky had to endure the humiliation of meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent apparently for the sole purpose of ironing out the ‘critical minerals’ reimbursement deal, where it was again hinted that the Munich meeting would consist of nothing more than the signing ceremony for the mineral wealth handover.

Image
“It is dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.”

The Ukrainian 79th brigade reportedly reflected on the betrayal of soon having to fight and die for American-owned ‘rare earth’ mines, rather than their own Ukrainian land:

Image

This was followed by SecDef Hegseth’s speech today at the Ukraine Defense Contact Group in Brussels, wherein Hegseth peremptorily outlined the US’ priorities: (Video at link.)

No NATO, no 2014 borders, and very definitively: no US troops anywhere in Ukraine at any time, including as peace keepers after end of hostilities. Just to make sure, he even emphasized this again: (Video at link.)

Oh, and the other big one: any European troops ever deployed to Ukraine will not be covered under Article 5. Does it sound to anyone else like Trump’s team is purposely ‘feeding’ the European lambs to the Russian wolf on a silver platter?

NATO apparatchiks were in tatters:

Image

Image

Image

What has really highlighted the oddity of this forced peace narrative was several recent statements outlining just how strong the Russian armed forces are becoming. This flies completely in the face of logic meant to convince us that Putin needs this peace deal as much as Zelensky—the sole point of which narrative is merely to push the agenda that the West needs to extract equal ‘concessions’ from Russia, as if Russia and Ukraine are on equal footing.

The main statement came from Zelensky himself, who baffled observers with his claim that Russia is now expanding its armed forces by a massive 100,000 troops, an absolutely puzzling figure given his claims of untold Russian losses:

Image
https://www.lrt.lt/en/news-in-english/1 ... n-minister

Russia's military capabilities are three times greater than they were before the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Lithuanian Defense Minister Dovilė Šakalienė has said.

"Russia's military capabilities are already three times greater than they were when the large-scale invasion of Ukraine began three years ago. And all of this has happened in the context of an active war," the minister said in an interview with the 15min.lt news website published on Monday.

Zelensky then went on to scare Europeans by claiming after Ukraine falls, Russia will easily occupy all of Europe, as the now-swelled Russian army has a “three to one” manpower advantage over the combined European armies: (Video at link.)

Conclusion:

Ongoing events are all an onanistic smokescreen from the West to save face and pretend that Russian power has been curbed, and Putin brought to heel. Nothing has changed, the Russian army is growing stronger and will soon redouble its offensives on all fronts until Ukraine crumbles. The chances of any ‘peace’ deal are slim, and certainly not before Zelensky is removed from power which is not even close to happening yet, with ‘talks’ of possible elections planned for fall of 2025.

In fact, in spring-summer Russian offensives will only intensify and the AFU’s back will likely be broken for good.

As a last curiosity—such is the inane nature of it—here’s an Atlantic Council piece co-written by none other than Zbigniew Brzezinski’s son:

Image
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/n ... n-ukraine/

It’s such a trite boilerplate reduction of standard establishment talking points, it’s unworthy of real discussion. However, the one last thing of note it brings up is the following:

It tediously mentions the need for a ‘coalition of the resolute’ to send troops to Ukraine, all under the fraudulent assumption that Russia is angling for a ceasefire. Think about the logic: why in the world would Russia want a ceasefire that puts NATO troops literally on Russia’s border? The entire raison d’etre of the war was based on keeping NATO away—yet Russia is going to sign a ceasefire that permits a massive NATO coalition within tank firing distance of Russian villages?

The whole idea is absurd. It just further cements this simple fact: Putin is merely playing the gracious host, and indulging the West in its bold extravagances of peace ‘showmanship’. In reality, Russia would never brook such deals, and so the war will continue on to its most logical conclusions until Trump or the West cry uncle.

Image

As stated, a major ballistic and cruise missile attack hit Kiev yesterday, wiping out several military enterprises as confirmed by one of them themselves:

Image

The office of RigExpert, a company that produces antenna and cable analyzers for the military, was destroyed by the Russian nighttime missile attack.

The company itself reports this!

A huge drone production site was reportedly demolished:

Image

The Russian army has liquidated one of the largest centers for the production of FPV drones in Kiev

▪️According to information received from Russian hackers from the Special Network Operations Service, the personal computers of the company's management were hacked and coordinates for the Iskander missile strike were provided.

▪️As a result of the strike, a secret enterprise of the Stream Techno company, which was engaged in the mass production and supply of light unmanned aerial vehicles for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, was liquidated.


A report from Masno, who lives in Ukraine:

Having spoken to a witness from the morning attack on Kiev. I am very convinced that Russia is using new missiles and or drones literally flying at or below tree top height. The witness saw the flying object passing his window and maneuvering...strange thing, no drone sound. So I really don't know what it is.

In the past few days, major gas terminals and other power grid hubs were hit in Chernigov, Poltava, Sumy, and elsewhere, with videos showing walls of flames lighting up the night skies at the facilities.

In Chernihiv region, after night rocket attacks, the Gnedintsevo gas processing plant is burning brightly and powerfully. There are no videos or photos.

Image

The Russian army struck the largest gas processing plant in Ukraine in the Chernihiv region

▪️According to the NASA satellite map of fires, the missile strike hit the Gnedintsevsky gas processing plant somewhere between 03:00 and 04:00 in the morning.

▪️Earlier, during the night shelling, our troops struck the Yarovka gas field and the Yablonovsky gas processing department.


Another major hit a few days ago which left Kramatorsk entirely without power:

Image

A comprehensive strike on Kramatorsk's energy infrastructure: complete power outage at key supply nodes of the Ukrainian Armed Forces

On the night of February 7, 2025, Russian troops continued to strike the enemy's energy infrastructure. After the successful destruction of the 330 kV Mayskaya substation , additional energy system facilities in the region were subjected to strikes, which led to a complete destabilization of the energy supply in Kramatorsk, Druzhkovka and Konstantinovka .

As a result of the attack , both 110 kV power lines were damaged , providing power to industrial zones, military facilities and logistics centers. Kramatorsk was completely de-energized , which led to the shutdown of a number of production facilities and destabilization of the operation of critically important facilities. A direct hit was recorded in the Energomashspetsstal area, causing the destruction of power transformers and an emergency shutdown of distribution devices .

Technical consequences of defeats:

• 110 kV power lines were disabled , which disrupted the supply of tactical units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, supply depots and repair bases.

• Power transformers of the TDTN-40000/110 type were damaged , which led to the failure of power supply systems and the shutdown of the industrial zone.

• The operation of the 110 kV switchgear distribution devices has been disrupted , which eliminates the possibility of quickly switching loads and promptly restoring power supply.

The disabling of the region's energy infrastructure reduces the Ukrainian Armed Forces' ability to maintain combat capability, complicates logistics, and disrupts the operation of military facilities. The expected time for restoration of energy supply remains uncertain , making the situation in this sector even more unstable.


(More at link.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/dou ... ia-ignites

******

Ukraine - The Beginning Of The End (Which Is Yet Far Away)[

Trump's opening gambit in the negotiations with Russia about Ukraine has caused some waves.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced that the borderland, i.e. Ukraine, will have to give up territory to Russia. There will be no place for Ukraine in NATO. The U.S. will give no security guarantees to Ukraine. Neither the U.S. military nor NATO will take part in any peacekeeping mission in Ukraine.

With that the U.S. conceded to Russia two of its main requests. Four Ukrainian oblast plus Crimea will become parts of Russia. NATO enlargement towards the east has been stopped. Any U.S. deployment to Ukraine is, for now, out of question.

The devil however is in the details. Russia will want legal agreements and guarantees. It knows that these might (again) be broken but it is still be better to have those than none.

There is also no agreement at all, when, where and how the fighting might stop.

The Trump administration wants an immediate ceasefire along the current line of contact. For Russia this just a repeat of Minsk 1 and 2 agreements which were used to prop up Ukraine. It is not a sufficient solution.

The Russian readout of yesterday's Trump-Putin call says:

Donald Trump spoke in favour of stopping the hostilities as soon as possible and solving the crisis peacefully.

In turn, Vladimir Putin pointed out it was necessary to eliminate the root causes of the conflict.


Trump wants a ceasefire, Putin wants more.

The question of NATO membership for Ukraine is only one element of the root causes of the conflict. What is necessary to conclude the war is a long lasting indivisible European security structure in which every major country can feel save and secure.

In late 2021 Russia presented two papers to the U.S. and NATO which point to potential solutions. Discussions on those have not even started. This will be a long process.

Unless a structure of indivisible security in Europe is found and agreed upon Russia will have to use military means to guarantee security for itself and its allies. Its Special Military Operation is likely to continue until that objective has been achieved.

There is no sign that Trump has recognized the larger issue at hand and is willing to talk about it. When he finds out that there is no short term solution - a ceasefire - to have, he might want to dump the whole issue and ignore the outcome: "Let Europe take care ..."

When the Biden administration provoked and executed the proxy war against Russia, major European countries ignored their own interest and behaved like U.S. vassals. They now make noise about being left out of the peace process.

Well, if you behave like vassals and ignore your own interest why are you astonished when you are treated like vassals and have your own interests ignored? Grow some balls and fight for your interests. Then maybe, just maybe, other will also start to keep your interests in mind.

Posted by b on February 13, 2025 at 15:51 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/02/u ... l#comments

******

Panic Grips European Leaders as EU Left Out of Trump-Putin Call
11 hours ago

https://cdn1.img.sputnikglobe.com/img/1 ... 0.jpg.webp[/img]
US President Donald Trump speaks on the phone - Sputnik International, 1920, 13.02.2025
© AP Photo / Alex Brandon

Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump discussed Ukraine, the Middle East, energy issues, and the exchange of citizens in a telephone call that lasted for one and a half hours, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov revealed.
The phone conversation between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump has triggered a litany of reactions from European politicians.
Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy posted a joined statement by several European states that read: “Our shared objectives should be to put Ukraine in a position of strength. Ukraine and Europe must be part of any negotiations.”

Image
Screenshot of X post by Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
© Photo : DavidLammy

UK Defense Secretary John Healey claimed that no peace talks could be done “about Ukraine without Ukraine.”
Boris Pistorius, Germany's defense chief, lamented the development as "regrettable" arguing that the Trump administration had made "concessions" to Russia, while asserting that “it would have been better to speak about a possible NATO membership for Ukraine or possible losses of territory at the negotiating table."
Joining the bandwagon, Germany Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock added that “peace can only be achieved together. And that means: with Ukraine and with the Europeans.”
In addition, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk declared that "All we need is peace… Ukraine, Europe and the United States should work on this together."
For his part, French top diplomat Jean-Noel Barrot insisted that "There will be no just and durable peace in Ukraine without Europeans."

Image
Screenshot of X post by French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot.
© Photo : jnbarrot

Meanwhile, Estonian Defense Minister Hanno Pevkur chimed in, saying: "Europe is investing in Ukrainian defense, and Europe is rebuilding Ukraine with European Union money, with our bilateral aid – so we have to be there."
And finally, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called for turbo-charging defense production among member states, adding: “We have to make sure that Ukraine is in a position of strength.”

https://sputnikglobe.com/20250213/panic ... 63947.html

*****

SVR and CIA to hold talks on Ukraine
February 13, 19:00

Image

The SVR and the CIA will hold talks on Ukraine,

as expected.

The head of the SVR, Naryshkin, reported that after the telephone conversations between Putin and Trump, the heads of the SVR and the CIA received instructions to intensify contacts on the subject of negotiations on ending the war in Ukraine. Further, we can expect intensified negotiations between the Russian Foreign Ministry and the US State Department.
At these negotiations, intelligence officers and diplomats will discuss the preparation of the Putin-Trump negotiations in Saudi Arabia and potential parameters for ending the war.

In fact, this is what a discussion of Ukraine without Ukraine looks like .
Of course, negotiations do not guarantee a mandatory result, but judging by the hysteria in the West with cries of "betrayal of Ukraine" and "betrayal of democracy", the globalists suspect the worst.

At the same time, of course, we should not flatter ourselves ahead of time, we will still see what conditions the Americans will put forward. Because the example of Minsk-1 and Minsk-2 (yesterday, by the way, was 10 years ago) is very memorable. The main thing here is not to agree so that then after a certain amount of time the "We thought it would be like this, but we were deceived" starts again.
Let's see what our negotiators can achieve.

P.S. Trump hinted once again today that elections are needed in Ukraine, adding that "Zelensky's ratings aren't very good."

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9668530.html

The worst day in Albats' life
February 14, 8:39

Image

Trump publicly confirmed that one of the goals of the NWO was the West's plans to draw Ukraine into NATO, which Russia could not agree with.

Thus, the United States publicly acknowledged what Russia said before, during and after the start of the NWO. If it were not for the West's plans to draw Ukraine into NATO, the likelihood of war would be significantly lower, although of course the reasons for war are not limited to the NATO issue alone. Nevertheless, through Trump, Russia's position on the issue of starting the NWO is being legitimized.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9669232.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply