Russia today

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Thu May 01, 2025 3:52 pm

Another Shocker: WSJ Reveals Russia Arming Massive New Rear Reserve Force
Simplicius
Apr 30, 2025

A new Wall Street Journal article has the conflict analysis world gibbering:

Image
https://www.wsj.com/world/russia/russia ... d-ff53b912

In alarmist fashion it describes a putative ‘build up’ of Russian military strength on NATO’s northeastern flank:

Image

The article hammers home that Russia has been vastly expanding its arms production and army’s general strength, contrary to the lower-tier propaganda fed to the masses about a collapsing Russian Armed Forces:

Production of artillery cannons and munitions is expected to rise by around 20% this year, and drone quality and production have increased significantly.

“The Russian military is reconstituting and growing at a faster rate than most analysts had anticipated,” Gen. Christopher Cavoli, commander of U.S. forces in Europe, told a Senate committee this month. “In fact, the Russian army, which has borne the brunt of combat, is today larger than it was at the beginning of the war.”


The most eye-opening direct statement from the article:

Image

Russia’s recent production of military equipment has more than made up for what it is losing in Ukraine.
Is that so?

But the most instructive part came as a direct vindication of something I’ve been writing here for a long time—that a large portion of Russian regeneration of both manpower and materiel has been going toward standing up reserve army corps in the rear, which Shoigu had announced as far back as 2023:

Image

In 2021, before the invasion, Russia made about 40 of its main battle tanks, the T-90M, according to Western intelligence estimates. Now it is producing nearly 300 a year. A senior Finnish military official said almost none are being sent to the front line in Ukraine, but are staying on Russian soil for later use.

Read the bolded portion above again.

Image

So, Russia is reportedly producing 300 T-90Ms and sending virtually all of them to the newly-constituted rear reserve units. This vindicates those readers who’ve long suspected that Russia was “holding back the best stuff” and using lower tier gear on the active front. I myself was admittedly not a particular devotee of that line of reasoning, but it seems even I may have been wrong on that count. It certainly would explain the lack of recent sightings of T-90Ms, BMPT Terminators, and other such ‘fancy’ gear on the front—Russia would apparently rather save the good stuff for a clash against NATO itself.

Some have even noted the reappearance of proper tank columns to the 2025 Red Square parade—seen here in rehearsal: (Video at link.)

Last year famously featured a minimalist ensemble led by relic T-34s.

Granted, critics can argue with good reason that this would constitute a kind of betrayal of priorities and current troops dying on the frontline in ‘armored Bukhankas’, motorcycles, etc. But I think this topic is far more nuanced and would require a much longer tactical exegesis on its own, perhaps in an upcoming article. The gist would be the following: it’s not so much that Russia doesn’t value the lives of current frontline grunts, but simply that Russia’s present strategy of advancement comes as a direct response to Ukraine’s own chosen defense philosophy.

You see, more and more we hear Ukrainian officials and military experts themselves echo what the pro-UA OSINT community has been warbling for a while now: that Ukraine is shifting almost entirely to a drone-centric defense strategy. A recent claimed Ukrainian POW statement highlights this:

Starshe Edda: Recently, an AFU soldier who was captured on the Krasnoyaruzhsk direction said:

You are receiving 2 Kamaz [trucks] of soldiers, while we are receiving 2 Kamaz [trucks] of drones. Of course, his phrase is somewhat exaggerated, but in general it makes sense. The era of drones has introduced such a thing in military tactics, which led to the fact that in defense, that in the offensive, the presence of manpower minimized. A company stronghold is defended by a squad, at most a platoon. Drones relentlessly attack defensive lines and in fact they (engineering structures) have lost very significantly in the quality of their original intent. Now the basis is not powerful ramparts and slabs, but maximum camouflage, even at the expense of protective functions. The soldier often sits in a simple burrow, without heating, in order to maximize camouflage. Once the location of a shelter with a live force inside has been compromised, it will be sprayed with a variety of drones, from kamikazes to [VOG grenade] drops.


As such, in this type of shifting tactical environment, Russian commanders have begun favoring small, fast, expendable civilian vehicles. Certainly vehicular shortages do play a part to an extent—but it’s not the whole story.

A Russian supply line seen today: (Video at link.)

Note the vast amount of bikes at the front of the ‘column’. They could have easily fit those same people into a Bukhanka of some kind, but they often choose to “disperse” on single-man bikes instead, because when drones come buzzing, there’s better chance of individual survival when the entire infantry squad can scatter in different directions on their own swift, easily-jettisoned motorbikes.

But this in no way completely obviates the need for Russia to mass-produce better infantry carriers as well, it’s simply a contextualization of the nuances of this changing face of war.

Getting back to the WSJ article:

Image

The article notes that brigades stationed in the Leningrad district and outlying areas will triple in size:

Most of the manpower expansion will take place in the Leningrad district, which faces Estonia, Latvia and Finland. Smaller brigades will nearly triple in size to become divisions of around 10,000 troops, according to Western military and intelligence officials.

Image

Satellite images in 2022 and 2025 of Russia's Kamenka military base near the border with Finland. The recent image shows new troop housing, according to investigators at Finnish research organization Black Bird Group.Planet Labs PBC


This is part and parcel to the reserves growth mentioned earlier. And to drive home the point, they lay the next bombshell—that Russian recruitment has swelled higher than ever. In particular, pay attention to the bolded centerpiece below:

The U.S. estimates that around 30,000 Russians are signing up each month, up from about 25,000 last summer. Some Eastern European intelligence officials say the ranks are now swelling by some 40,000 soldiers a month.

The extra manpower has allowed the military to rotate new troops in and out of Ukraine, and to build new units trained and housed in Russia, according to some European intelligence assessments.


So, not only do they confirm that Russia is regenerating 30,000 men per month, and even 40,000 according to some sources, but the biggest bombshell of all is made which fully redeems my reporting over the past year and a half: Russia is siphoning some of the newly recruited troops into new units stationed in the rear of Russia proper; i.e. reserves.

This should once and for all conclusively put to bed theories around where the Russian 30k+ monthly troops are going: a portion is replenishing hard losses, a portion replacing contract non-renewals, and a portion is going directly to the rear to stand up new armies meant to prepare Russia for a much bigger clash against NATO proper.

It could very well be 10k/10k/10k for each of the above categories. I believe more than ever Russians are incentivized to join on short contracts simply to collect the massive signing bonuses, but after 6 months to a year at most—if they survive—they complete the contract and go back home with pockets stuffed full of cash. These need to be constantly replenished with new faces—recall that only the original 300k mobilized from September 2022 were decreed to fight to the end with no ‘official’ demobilization, the remainder of the hundreds of thousands who’ve signed up since then have all done so on contracts either at the 6 month, 1 year, or 2 year terms—and I would not be surprised if 6 months is the most popular.

Russia is tailoring its rearmament plans to meet the needs of the new troops to be stationed along its NATO border. Those units will get much of the new equipment. Most of what is being sent to the front line in Ukraine is old and refurbished Soviet-era arms.

Image

Well, well, well.

Now in light of the above, it is interesting that Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Syrsky announced today that Russia has brought reserves and increased intensity of operations in the Pokrovsk direction. A top Ukrainian analyst writes that the interfluve between the Solona and Vovcha rivers sees Ukrainian defenses under tremendous strain and cracking; this is precisely the bulge southwest of Pokrovsk.

Not only is Russia slated to hold a ‘fearsome’ round of Zapad exercises in Belarus this year, mirroring the pre-war drills of 2022, but there are even speculative rumors—courtesy of Legitimny channel—that North Koreans will soon be brought into the fray on Ukrainian territory proper; and in much larger numbers at that:

"Our source reports that DPRK soldiers will take part in the war on Ukrainian territory (previously they fought only in the Kursk region) if Trump's peace case stalls.

The source points out that if the war escalates, then by the end of the year more than two hundred thousand North Korean soldiers will be fighting in the ranks of the Russian Armed Forces using their own equipment.

Such an “infusion” threatens the collapse of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ defense.

That's why everyone is now saying that the Russians will most likely go to Sumy, which they will encircle. We have been hearing about this for a long time. Also, the Russians are now creating a buffer zone at the border, which forces Kiev to pull reserves from other parts of the front, simply to slow down the Russian advance.

The situation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces is very, very sad, although Syrsky and Zelensky are trying to tell you fairy tales.

All our sources are waiting for the X moment when everything will collapse at once. It can happen at any moment."


Take that with a giant grain of Yellow Sea salt, but nevertheless—things were always bound to get interesting in this most pivotal of years. Part of it, I believe, is meant to be a deliberate warning to the West not to try anything, vis-a-vis NATO troops in Ukraine. It is the North Korean Damocles sword which threatens to unleash a mass unified rebuff to any unauthorized Western troop deployments. After all, just today the comic barks of boots-on-ground advocates again made headlines:

Image

Image
https://www.thetimes.com/article/726e31 ... 9a44df3921

Trump in the meantime is now increasingly changing his tune, accelerating the timeline from “Ukraine being taken in a few years” to “being crushed very shortly” in his latest statements:

Image
https://kyivindependent.com/i-think-tha ... g-ukraine/

We’ll have to wait and see what happens in the next two weeks, as the US has given another ‘ultimatum’ that it will soon walk away from the conflict, reiterated today by the State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce: (Video at link.)

Needless to say, given today’s new information from the WSJ, Russia is in no rush, and is methodically husbanding its forces in preparation for all future contingencies, as it dutifully rotates frontline troops while slowly grinding down the Ukrainian Armed Forces all along the front. North Korea has now provided a tangible backstop of additional forces which can be deployed at any time to thwart any Western tricks—as such, despite all Western attempts at spoiling, Russia remains in command of the wider geostrategic initiative of the conflict, while reducing Ukraine to few promising choices to escape the tightening boa constrictor.

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/ano ... als-russia

*****

WHAT DEAL WILL PRESIDENT PUTIN MAKE WITH THE MAN WHO RULES THE WORLD BUT NOT THE BATTLEFIELD

Image

by John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

In the new podcast with Nima Alkhorshid, here is the breaking news of the sides in the war changing the appearance of their negotiating positions, starting with President Donald Trump and the reply from President Vladimir Putin.

Click to view: https://www.youtube.com/

As you listen, here is the new evidence.

Reporting accurately the policy views of officials, civilian and military, is difficult. Less so, the shift of Russian public opinion behind the Army, the President and other national institutions, such as the Church.

Image
Source: https://www.levada.ru/

Polls of the Russian public generally confirm that they are increasingly optimistic and confident that the direction of the country is positive in general, beneficial for them in particular. In the latest survey by the independent Levada Centre of Moscow, published on April 25 (data gathered between April 17 and 23), it was reported that “the mood of Russians has been improving for the second month in a row: up to the fifth part of the share of respondents who say that they are in a great mood (20%, growth by 8 p.p. from January 2025), the share of those who experience tension, irritation, fear, longing (decrease by 5 percentage points since January 2025) has decreased to 16%), but the majority of respondents are still in a normal, flat state (63%), a decrease of 5 p.p… The normal flat state is often indicated by respondents 55 years and older (67%); Muscovites (73%); those who believe that things in the country are going in the right direction (65%); those who approve of the activities of Vladimir Putin as president (63%); those respondents who say that the financial situation of their family has remained unchanged (69%); as well as those who support the actions of the Russian military in Ukraine (64%).”

The reciprocally reinforcing effects of battlefield success and stable or improving income on support for the Army, the President, and the direction of the country are plain. So is the reverse. “The level of disapproval of V. Putin is higher among the less wealthy respondents (14% among those who are barely enough for food); those who say that the financial situation of their family over the past year has worsened (23%); those who trust YouTube channels as a source of information (28%); those who believe that the country is going in the wrong direction (49%); those who do not support the actions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in Ukraine (40%); and those who believe that it is necessary to move to peace now.”


For Russian sociologists tracking public opinion towards the war, the military outcome, negotiating options, and the perception of Russia’s enemies and allies, Denis Volkov, director of the Levada Centre, recently concluded that the “mobilization effect” has triggered a dramatic switch of Russian public opinion towards China as Russia’s ally in war, and against the US and European states who are blamed for causing the war.

At the present time, as the Russian media are reporting President Trump’s pressure on President Putin to accept US terms for a peace deal, the Russian “party of war”, according to Volkov, numbers less than a majority. “Only about 40% of Russians can be considered the conditional ‘party of war’ (the average figure for over for all measurements — in the last few months this figure has decreased slightly), which insists that ‘it is necessary to continue military action.’ At the same time, the most consistent pro-military position is demonstrated by half the number of people – only about 20%-25% of Russians (depending on the wording of the issue, these figures are also quite stable) – those who all this time answer that ‘the ceasefire is now unacceptable under any circumstances’” and ‘definitely we should continue military operations.’ These are first of all, older men, and followers and supporters of the government. Their main arguments, responding in focus groups in the answers to open questions, are usually as follows: ‘it is necessary to finish what you started’, ‘it is necessary to go to the end, otherwise for what were all these victims’, ‘we need only victory’, ‘we cannot allow the enemy to regroup’, ‘we should negotiate with no one’ ”.

According to several poll measurements since 2022, “the so-called right opposition – people who advocate continuation of hostilities and at the same time do not support the authorities, the personification of which was Igor Strelkov (Girkin) — is almost indistinguishable in the polls. This position can be vividly represented in the military telegram channels, but, judging by the polls, it is shared by no more than 5% of Russians.”

If these hawks are in a minority from a base of 5% to no more than 25%, so are the doves, according to the Levada polling. “Throughout the conflict, the share of Russians who openly do not support the actions of the Russian military was on average about 18%-20%…Inside this group there are also people with ‘strong’ and ‘weak’ attitudes which differ from each other in their political views and a common understanding of the situation. Thus, the ‘strong’, uncompromising anti-war position is characteristic of 8% to 9% of Russians – these are people with the most consistent and well-designed anti-war beliefs. Often it is this position that is associated with tough anti-Putin views, sympathies to Ukraine and the West. Their main source of information is the Internet and video blogs. The remaining 9%-10% of Russians show rather a weak, less consistent disagreement with the position of the Russian authorities on Ukraine, which is not necessarily accompanied by pro-Ukrainian and pro-Western sympathies. This position is characteristic of the youngest Russians.”

Volkov has also reported on the sensitive issue of how Russian public is responding to the casualties of the war. “The intensity of hostilities and their duration suggest that the losses are serious. At the same time, no mass protest movement in Russia is observed…It is possible to explain the lack of resonance by the fact that the protest is not allowed to unfold, actions are dispersed, and people are afraid to take part in them, the information space is controlled, the criticism is forced into alternative media and marked by the dominant state media as a point of view of the enemy. All these explanations are fair, but it’s not just about that…”

“In focus groups, the topic of the number of losses arises from time to time, especially if there are those among the participants who have lost a relative or acquaintance. In this case, people usually share a personal experience, usually without criticism of the authorities. The lack of open protest may reflect the restraint stemming from multimillion-rouble payments to the families of those killed in special operations, the benefits for their children – all this should be especially significant for families in the Russian hinterland. In most cases, military operations do not directly affect the participants of focus groups, and therefore they can talk about the number of deaths rather detachedly. For most, these losses occur to someone else. The representation of people in the battles in Ukraine involves mainly professional soldiers and volunteers. Which means it’s their job, their choice, they knew what they were going to do.”

The Russian military bloggers do not publish data on Russian casualties, although they acknowledge that battlefield losses are occurring frequently, sometimes severely. The anti-Russian propaganda agencies Mediazona and BBC have been estimating Russian casualties from what they say is “a named list of deceased Russian military personnel. This list is compiled from verified, publicly available sources, including social media posts by family members, local news reports, and official announcements from regional authorities.”

These figures are considered by Russian and other military sources to be more credible than the figures announced by the Kiev regime, by Trump, his officials and the mainstream US media.

Image

Image
Source: https://en.zona.media/article/2025/04/2 ... es_eng-trl

In a report published last December by the Levada Centre, the dramatic switch of Russian public opinion from pro-American to anti-American, and correspondingly from anti to pro-Chinese was illustrated. “The contours of the current social attitude towards China were finally formed ten years ago against the backdrop of the conflict between Russia and the West over Ukraine. An important symbolic event was the presence of Xi Jinping at the parade in honor of the 70th anniversary of the Victory in Moscow in May 2015, while Western leaders refused to come demonstratively. The participation of the Chinese leader allowed us to say: “If China is with us, it will not be possible to isolate Russia.”

“As a result, in 2014, the number of Russians perceiving China as a friendly country doubled from 20 to 40%, positive estimates rose from 55 to 77%. A similar dynamics was observed after February 2022: a positive attitude towards China reached a record 92%, the perception of the country as friendly – 65%. The positive attitude towards China prevails in all socio-demographic groups and at all ages. The youngest respondents and residents of the Far East are as positive as possible to him, where interaction between the countries is most active.”

“The reversal towards China is perceived as an important element of the policy of Vladimir Putin and therefore reproduces the attitude to the president himself. A similar thing is observed in relation to the United States, to which opposition-minded citizens are much better than supporters of the authorities. Today, China is largely perceived by Russian public opinion as a counterweight to the West, anti-America. This was clearly manifested in the mirror discrepancy between China and the United States, first in 2014-2015, and then in 2022-2024, when the difference between these indicators reached 74 percentage points. The ongoing conflict with the West maintains a positive image of China in Russia. But this may mean that as relations with the West normalize the value of Russian-Chinese relations and the general attractiveness of China in the eyes of Russians will decline.”

Image

Image

Image

Source: https://www.levada.ru/2024/12/09/i-ne-d ... rag-a-kak/

https://johnhelmer.net/what-deal-will-p ... more-91519

******

Nationalism is the first step to Nazism
May 1, 1:13 PM

Image

Putin yesterday took a rather harsh swipe at domestic nationalists, linking radical nationalism with Nazism.

"Nationalism is the first stage towards Nazism, it is the first step. Because nationalism is based not simply on love for representatives of one's own ethnic group, but on hatred of others. That is the essence of nationalism. Patriotism is a completely different matter. Loving your homeland does not mean hating others" - Putin, 2025.

As expected, right-wing resources experienced massive flare-ups, including equating Putin with Lenin and Stalin. Of course, Putin is as far from communists as he is from nationalists. Therefore, under Putin, neither a nationalist state nor the USSR 2.0 will be built.

For those for whom Putin's criticism of nationalism was a revelation, I will simply remind you that:

"The biggest nationalist in Russia is me. But the most correct nationalism is to build actions and policies in such a way that it benefits the people. If nationalism is understood as intolerance towards other people - chauvinism, this will destroy our country, which was originally formed as a multinational, multi-confessional state.
This is not only a dead end, it is a path to self-destruction. In Russia, they will do everything to prevent this from happening" - Putin, 2014.

In fact, Putin here touches on the issue of great-power chauvinism (that is, the imaginary superiority of some peoples over others based on national characteristics). And here, yes, with a certain desire to stretch an owl onto a globe, one can see allusions to the criticism of great-power chauvinism in the USSR under Lenin and Stalin, which was also positioned as destructive for the entire USSR project.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9813286.html

We need to find out the attitude of the residents towards Stalingrad
May 1, 15:02

Image

Also yesterday, Putin gave the de facto go-ahead to officially raise the issue of renaming Volgograd to Stalingrad.

A cadet of the "Voin" center, an activist of the Volgograd regional public organization "House of Friendship" Regina Sultanova, during a conversation with Putin at the site of the marathon "Knowledge. First" asked the head of state to consider the issue of renaming Volgograd to Stalingrad.

"This is for the residents to decide, we will think about it, we need to ask the residents," the head of state replied.
"There is certainly logic in this. If we deideologize the name (Stalingrad - ed.) as much as possible, then, of course, it is associated with the Victory ... But we still need to find out the attitude of the majority of residents to this," Putin added, noting that he would think about this issue.

In fact, now it is a matter of polling residents on the topic of renaming. This has actually been discussed for many years. The simplest thing is to tie the poll on renaming the city to the next single voting day in order to save as much as possible on the issues of organizing a poll of residents. And then make decisions based on the results of the poll. Of all the possible options, this is the most democratic and will allow the authorities, no matter the outcome, to declare that this is what the local population decided.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9813731.html

Festive
May 1, 17:05

Image

1. Today is International Workers' Solidarity Day - congratulations to all who know the value of labor! It is worth remembering that this is first and foremost a holiday of international workers' solidarity, and only secondly a holiday of spring and all that other stuff.

Image

2. Also today is the Foundation Day of the Wagner PMC - my congratulations to the veterans of the most famous PMC of the 21st century. Many of them still defend their homeland with honor at the front.

Image

3. In addition, on this day 80 years ago, by order of Stalin, Sevastopol received the title of Hero City. Happy holiday, beloved city! Well, let's not forget that on this same day 80 years ago, Leningrad, Stalingrad and Odessa became hero cities. Together with Sevastopol, they were the first.

P.S. Let's not forget that the Hero City of Odessa is under Nazi occupation. And something needs to be done about them.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9813766.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Fri May 02, 2025 1:17 pm

Victory Day: A Conversation with Participants in the Educational Marathon "Knowledge. The First."

Karl Sanchez
Apr 30, 2025

Continuing his tour of Great Patriotic War historic sites, Putin was back in Moscow where he went to Victory Park’s complex at Poklonnaya Gora, one of the strategic heights in the Moscow region, and its Central Museum of the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945 where he met with participants in the national educational marathon held from April 28 to April 30 by the all-Russian public and state educational organization "Russian Society "Znanie" whose theme this year is Knowledge First—the two large words on the backdrop behind Putin’s left in the above photo—as it relates to the Great Patriotic War. The audience was a mixture of mostly youngsters along with some adult mentors and Znanie organization personnel. The educational marathon is conducted annually, is very popular and international in scope. Putin’s talk with some of the participants has become an annual tradition. The Kremlin tells us “The event was attended by more than 25 thousand young people, including those from foreign countries. Over three days, 134 lecturers performed at venues across the country: veterans, members of the Free Military Association, war correspondents, athletes, entrepreneurs, scientists and teachers, public and state figures. Here’s the talk:
Vladimir Putin: Dear friends, good afternoon!

I am very glad to see you on the eve of such wonderful bright holidays as Victory Day.

Here are representatives of cultural figures, and our very young specialists in the field of information dissemination and creating the necessary, as it is now fashionable to say, content.

Of course, all the work of the Znanie society this year is dedicated to the main theme–-Victory Day.

This is a special day for all of us, for our people, for almost every Russian family. In Soviet times, this holiday was often spoken about with words from the song: this is a holiday with tears in your eyes.

First of all, it is certainly a holiday, because Victory Day and everything that happened during the Second World War and, as we say for ourselves, the Great Patriotic War, is certainly a triumph of our people, a triumph of the Soviet people and the Russian people. Perhaps, first of all, the Russian people, because if you look at the number of losses, then Russia is part of the Soviet Union, then it was called the RSFSR–-the Russian Soviet Federative [Socialist] Republic, the losses of the RSFSR amounted to about 70 percent, 69-something, almost 70 percent.

That is why we always emphasize this, it is true: all the peoples of the Soviet Union made a huge contribution, no one spared themselves, everyone worked for the common Victory, but, of course, the Russian Federation, due to its scale, made the maximum contribution to this Victory and most of all laid its sons and daughters on the altar of this Victory, who died defending their homeland and protecting our future.

When I said that this is a holiday for almost every family, it is natural, because with such huge losses--for the entire Soviet Union it was 27 million people, it is not exactly counted yet, but it is clear that it affected almost every family. And it is extremely important to use modern opportunities to transmit this information, this truth about the past, in this case about the Great Patriotic War and its heroes, to transmit it both today and tomorrow.

What would you like to say in this regard? Of course, those who fought during the Great Patriotic War, gave their lives for our country, for our Homeland, for today, for it to be preserved as such, for new generations to appear in our country, they have accomplished a feat. But they still do it, even those who died defending the Fatherland. Why? Because the memory of their feat is one of the essential principles of all our multinational people. To a large extent, this is Russia, because the historical memory of what was in the past and what is now sets us up for what can and should be in the future. Only by understanding the cost of our present and our future, only by understanding the cost and what our ancestors, our fathers, grandfathers, great-grandfathers, even grandmothers did, defending the Motherland, only by understanding the cost of this work, can we understand who we are, where we came from, what we are our country. And only in this case can we correctly determine the future and priorities of our actions for today, in the medium term and in the longer term.

Of course, it is very important in this regard to be able and able to correctly, sincerely, if I may say so, to convey all the information about what happened in previous decades, previous years, because only in this way can this information enter the heart of any person and only in this way can it become a part of his soul, and this means that each individual and all of us together will create a single common whole. And we will feel like a united people, which is extremely important.

Modern means of communication, of course, are significantly different from what was before, from books, now they read less, and maybe they go to cinemas less often, I do not know, we need to look at statistics, but this is only a way of communicating information, it is changing. And it is important for us that modern means convey the necessary content to people, content, as it is fashionable to say now, but this should certainly be connected with our desire to do this, and with our abilities to achieve this goal using modern means of delivering this information. And of course, all this should be based on the best traditions of Russian art. And based on these traditions, to shape the day of today and tomorrow, I mean the possibilities of using modern means of communication.

In this regard, of course, it is very important that modern generations of artists themselves are imbued with this desire to work in this field and would charge around them all who can be involved in this work, and we have a lot of such people.

Just now a small exhibition was shown.

Now I will say a few words about the Znanie society. It was initiated by our outstanding scientist and then president of the USSR Academy of Sciences [Sergey] Vavilov. That's how it all started. And indeed, in previous years, even in Soviet times, the title of lecturer was very respected, it was always at a high level.

But even now, after the revival, after the new incarnation of the society "Knowledge", the work is developing quite quickly and, I would say, effectively. Already 30 thousand lecturers, reaching an audience of 50 million people-this already means something.

And the level of trust in what the lecture corps of the Znanie society does reaches 80 percent among citizens of the country. This is very serious. And I want to thank everyone who organizes the work of the Znanie Society for this.

Why? Because it means that the selection of these lecturers is correct. This means that when people listen to them, they trust what they say and how they say it. It is very important. And what, and how—is also still important.

I was very pleased to see military personnel here. Just now, one of the participants of the special military operation was telling me about his work in the Znanie society. It is very important that our heroes of today work directly with young people, speak directly about what they saw, what they did, how they assess what is happening in the country and in the world as a whole. An extremely important thing.

When I said that for every Russian family, the events of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War are important, including because it affected every family. And I am sure that almost every family remembers their ancestors in one way or another: about grandmothers, grandfathers, great–grandfathers using concrete examples.

Today, we need to talk about it using concrete examples of our guys who are fighting in the zone of a special military operation, defending the Fatherland, as well as concrete examples of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War. Then, in this case, it will definitely meet with trust and understanding, exactly then it will touch the heart and soul of every person who comes into contact with this information. Only when it is transmitted from heart to heart, using personal examples, does it inspire confidence. This is the first one.

And the second very important thing. After all, when someone tells us something about their grandparents, we–-you, I, and all the other millions of Russian citizens--perceive it as a part of ourselves. If my father, if my grandfather, great-grandfather was such a hero, then somewhere in the genes and I have it, it means that I can and I should. This is an extremely important thing. I think we need to maintain this in the whole country and at the level of each family. And then, without any doubt, in any field, in any area, we will achieve the desired result and victory. I would like to say this at the very beginning.

Please, I think we can talk about what you're doing right now. If I can, I will be happy to comment or answer your questions.

You are welcome.

Mikhail Dreval: Mr President, Dasha Dmitrieva, a lecturer at the Znanie Society and a first-year student at St. Petersburg State University, will help me moderate today's meeting.

Dasha, you have the floor.

Daria Dmitrieva: Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, hello!

Today, our meeting is attended by schoolchildren, students, young cultural figures, lecturers and mentors. But regardless of our age and field of activity, we are united by our love for the Motherland and the desire to preserve the memory of the exploits of our ancestors and contemporaries.

For me, this topic is also very close. During the Great Patriotic War, my great-grandfather Konarev Grigory Ivanovich singlehandedly destroyed 11 armed Nazis in hand-to-hand combat. And when he left for the front, his daughter, my grandmother, fell fast asleep. And as he was saying goodbye at the train station, he said to his wife: if our daughter opens her eyes now, I will return from the war. The train started moving, and my grandmother woke up, and my great-grandfather, after going through the whole war, returned home.

It seems to me that the history of the Great Patriotic War should be studied primarily through the history of families. They help to look into the heart of each of us, as well as works of culture.

A picture dedicated to the heroic defense of the Brest Fortress is coming out very soon. And today we have with us the producer of this film, actor, People's Artist of Russia Vladimir Mashkov, the film's director Sergey Korotaev and the leading actor Vladislav Miller.

Vladimir Lvovich, I give you the floor.

Vladimir Putin: Good afternoon, Vladimir Lvovich!

Vladimir Mashkov: Hello!

Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich, Dear friends!

Today we will briefly tell you about the picture that was prepared for the anniversary of our Great Victory. But first of all, I want to say on behalf of all of us.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, thank you very much for the great work you do to preserve the memory and truth of the Great Patriotic War, and for the great attention you pay to our wonderful and talented youth. Thank you very much from all of us.

We tried to make the movie sincere, honest, exciting, leaving the word and idea of Boris Vasiliev, our great writer, with his work"Did not appear on the lists". We really want the audience to share the depth of our characters' feelings after watching this film, and, as you very accurately said, probably, so that every young person asks himself the question: would I be able to do this? That's what I think is very important.

Young artists of the Oleg Tabakov Theater and students of our theater school took part in the film. They prepared very selflessly–-both psychologically and physically, and watched a huge amount of material.

This story does not let us go. And now we are preparing a performance that we will combine together with the cinema, when battle scenes will be shown on the screen, which cannot be done in the theater, and live artists will perform dramatic scenes in a live plan. We look forward to the premiere in June.

And now we want to show you some fragments of our picture, so that you can make an impression.

Thank you very much.

(Demonstration of a fragment of the film "Not listed".) [In the video linked at the top the trailer is shown from about the 13:00-17:00 mark.]

Vladimir Putin: Yesterday, when we were in Volgograd, at the initiative of Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko, we talked about this. He was just telling me that he saw this movie. I thanked you very much for this work. I see that it is not in vain, there is something for it.

Indeed, when we started the meeting, I said that information about the heroic days of the Great Patriotic War should be piercing, reliable, and truthful, and then it will reach the heart.

Of course, such works of art, and this is certainly a work of art, work for this purpose and work exactly in the way I mentioned. Especially since Vasiliev's books are well known. Thanks to these books, works of cinema art also appeared: "And the dawns here are quiet...", "Tomorrow there was a war" and so on. A whole galaxy of our writers of that time, including Sholokhov, wrote things that still make up the golden part of our literature.

I must say that everything we know about our history, of course, comes to us from textbooks, it is studied and can be studied by specialists, historians, but the general public gets acquainted with these events thanks to the work of our outstanding writers, cinematographers, musicians, artists. Now we are talking about writers, including Vasiliev, but, say, the period of the Patriotic War of 1812--the vast majority of people know about these events from where? From Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace", "Borodino" by Lermontov: "Tell me, uncle, it's not for nothing that Moscow, burned down by fire... " - and so on. Everyone from school remembers this, and it causes interest in the events themselves.

Therefore, it is extremely important that artists are always close to these events and bring us everything related to the heroic pages of our history.

It's the same with music. It can be the root cause, or rather, the impetus for studying. I have in mind, say, Shostakovich's famous Leningrad Symphony. Then they make films about it, about this music, about how it came about, under what circumstances, and so on. Therefore, it is very important that artists working in different fields and genres address this topic today.

Of course, our life does not consist only of this, it is much more diverse, much more saturated, and the palette of colors is very different, meaning the peaceful part of it, the component. We also have a lot of interesting and important things in our peaceful life that we can be proud of in the old days, which we are proud of today and, I am sure, will be proud of in the future. But things related to heroic pages are extremely important. As I have already said, this is certainly a very important part of our inner world, and the inner world of each individual and all of us together–-in fact, this is what we call "Russia". Because Russia is people, not just a territory.

Thank you very much. I will definitely watch the whole movie.

Daria Dmitrieva: And now I would like to give the floor to Artem Zhilyaev. He represents the dynasty of school museum guides in the city of Ivanovo.

Vladimir Putin: A dynasty of tour guides? Do you have both your mom and dad there? Who does it?

Alexey Zhilyaev: I'll tell you about it now.

Vladimir Putin: Please.

Alexey Zhilyaev: Good evening, Vladimir Vladimirovich!

My name is Artem Zhilyaev, I am a representative of the children's public Council of the Victory School Museum from the city of Ivanovo.

In our school No. 29, a museum of the Normandie–Niemen regiment was opened in 1967. It contains personal belongings of French pilots, the squadron itself, and exhibits of the 18th Guards Fighter Aviation Regiment. In total, our museum has more than 2.5 thousand exhibits. Also on May 19, we will open a temporary exhibition dedicated to Georgy Zhukov's personal belongings.

I myself am a representative of the Zhilyaev dynasty. My uncle was a tour guide more than 35 years ago, and my grandfather Sergey was a tour guide more than 50 years ago.

I offer you such an initiative--to develop a national-level program to support curatorial activities and create school-based museums. And the best museums could present their exhibitions, and maybe entire expositions at regional sites-whether local history museums of the region, or multimedia platforms "Russia-my History", or in the Victory Museum.

We will be very grateful for your approval and support for this initiative.

Thank you.

Vladimir Putin: Thank you for your work and for the people close to you.

I want to say that school museums are actually a long-standing tradition in Russia. In my opinion, the first school museum appeared somewhere in Siberia, in Irkutsk, in the XVIII century. This is seventeen hundred and some year, I don't remember exactly. That is, a tradition with historical roots. It is very important. Of course, we need to support it. And I will ask my colleagues from the Government to do everything possible to help you and people like you who are engaged in this type of activity.

It is very important to generalize and make these generalizations from specific things that are related to the small homeland: with the city, with the village, with the republic, with the region, with the region, and so on. Because it makes our common history more visible, meaningful and understandable for each individual living in a particular locality. So very cool. I want to congratulate you on this choice, on this discovery. We will do our best to help you.

By the way, you mentioned that originally 1967 was the beginning of the museum's work. And it has to do with Normandie–Niemen, right? It's interesting, look, now I'll try to throw a bridge, it's connected with the "Normandy-Niemen", probably the vast majority know what it is. So the French patriots during the Second World War, despite the defeat of France, moved to the Soviet Union, fought with us and so called their combat squadron "Normandy-Niemen". Some of the French patriots fought in partisan detachments called "Poppies", and some–-on the fronts of the Great Patriotic War together with our soldiers.

There were other people in Europe, in the same France. There was a Marshal Petain, in my opinion, who basically agreed that his homeland was defeated and practically collaborated with Hitler's Germany, formed units that fought at Stalingrad later and so on, in other places.

We will not go into details now, because this is a difficult page in the history of France. And someone thought that he did the right thing to preserve the French as an ethnic group, as a nation, someone called him a traitor, and after the war he ended up with it–-as a traitor. Now we will not go into details. What is important is that there have always been people who have shared our principles and values, people who are together with us. And today, some citizens of the French Republic, together with our soldiers, are fighting shoulder to shoulder in the special military operation zone, and they also called their unit, like their grandfathers and great – grandfathers, "Normandy-Niemen".

Daria Dmitrieva: Mr President, you have mentioned the ways in which information can be conveyed. We understand how important it is for young people to share facts from the history of our country with each other.

I would like to give the floor to Victoria Agapova, the winner of the Keepers of History project and a blogger.

V. Agapova: Mr President, good afternoon!

My name is Victoria Agapova, Tambov city. I am a two-time winner of the All-Russian contest "Big Change" in the challenge "Remember!" and the author of a historical blog dedicated to the events and heroes of the Great Patriotic War.

My great-grandfather Boldyrev Alexander Ivanovich was a Hero of the Soviet Union; he defended our country from the Germans in Ukraine and Belarus. He was not only a brave but also a resourceful soldier. Once Alexander Ivanovich saved a damaged self-propelled gun of his comrades-in-arms, using a very unusual method. From his overalls, he made an effigy, which the Germans opened fire on. At the same moment, Alexander Ivanovich rushed to the wrecked car and stole it to his own, thereby saving his friends.

And there were quite a large number of such feats on the path of my great-grandfather. They inspired me to create a patriotic community where I tell the younger generation about war heroes and their achievements.

I understand that it is necessary to tell the younger generation about the war and historical facts in the language of young people, so that they can understand and be interested. But for me, this is the biggest challenge right now.

In your opinion, how should we tell the younger generation of our country about the war, about historical facts, about the history of our ancestors, in order to interest them in studying history?

Vladimir Putin: Vika, how did you learn this story about your great-grandfather?

V. Agapova: Family. My mother told me because my great-grandfather lived to see my mother's birth. She told me how he used to come to the village…

Vladimir Putin: Her grandfather?

V. Agapova: Yes.

Vladimir Putin: You see how. We have already talked about this, and I have already mentioned that it is very important when information is passed from one generation to another in a family. You just said, "My mother told me." You love your mother, and she loves you, there is no doubt about it, it's obvious right away, and you trust her.

My mother told me–-very little, very little--about some episodes of the war. It is well known that they barely survived-–as I have already said-during the blockade and while their father was fighting at the front, they lost a small child there. When people speak to you who you absolutely, completely trust, it naturally reaches your heart, as I said, and makes you want to do something yourself in order to consolidate this knowledge, consolidate this important information and pass it on.

Therefore, the surest way is what happens in our families, when from parents to children, from children further to their children, and so on.

V. Agapova: Through generations.

Vladimir Putin: Through generations, that's absolutely true. This is the most important thing–-the truthfulness, reliability of information. And, of course, the way this information is conveyed is also important.

My relatives gave me a letter from my grandfather, which he wrote (I also spoke about it publicly) during the war, his son, who was in the active army. He wrote with mistakes, a country man, a peasant, there are ten mistakes in each sentence.

What even bothered me? You see, he addresses his son as "you": "Dear Ivan Ivanovich." And then he talks about how his wife, that is, the mother of his son, died. There was a shootout, a bullet hit her in the stomach, and she was dying in his arms, at her grandfather's. And when she was dying, she said… You know, I have also said this, and I will repeat it again, because it is very important, it is a characteristic feature of so many of our people, regardless of their nationality, just Russian people, including Russians. She understands that she is dying, and she says to him (he writes everything in the letter): "Don't cry, don't upset me." When she dies, she thinks about him. As you can imagine, it's incredibly simple. And in the end, the conclusion: "Beat these reptiles!" You understand, the motivation was what. It is he who addresses his son. There are a lot of everyday issues related to the economy and so on, which are not essential in this case.

But in general, when you take such things in the family… So I took it and read it. You see, I'm an adult—I went to school, I went to university, I worked in the special services, I worked in intelligence for almost 20 years, I think I'm an informed person. I thought I knew everything. But when I picked up the letter and started reading it, I began to look at the events that took place then in a different way, in a different way. I became aware of the "fabric" of the events that took place at that time, understood how people lived, what they lived, how they felt, what they talked about. This eternal truth is the most important thing. It should be reported.

Of course, it is very important, if we are talking about ways to disseminate information in a broad sense, then it is very important that this work is talented, like, for example, a film, an excerpt from which we have just seen, or works of musical art, fine art. And how do I do, how do we do… I have everything going on just like you do in your family–-just like everyone else.

V. Agapova: Thank you very much.

Daria Dmitrieva: Yes, indeed, we feel a special connection with the past thanks to our ancestors, their memories, and what remains of them. But a special connection with the military past is felt by those who stand and have stood guard over the Motherland.

Deputy company commander, Guards Senior Lieutenant Sergey Lobanov is not only a defender of the Motherland, but also a member of the Russian Writers' Union and a poet.

Sergey Lobanov: Comrade Supreme Commander-in-Chief! I wish you good health!

It is a great honor and pleasure for me to attend this meeting. Now we have all watched an excerpt from a movie based on the story of Boris Vasiliev. I am sure that no one among us was left indifferent. And why all this? Because in this work there is a truth, a real trench soldier's truth, which cannot be invented, it must be experienced by participating directly in battles. You know, the poet-front-line soldier of that time Sergey Orlov wrote the following lines very accurately about this:"I carried the lines that smelled like gunpowder out of the shelling on my hands."

I am very glad that this truth is also present in the works of modern writers, such as Hero of Russia Maxim Bakharev, Oleg Roy, Alexey Presnakov, Alexey Shorokhov and many, many others. These are just some of the names of the large pool of talented, creative people who are born in this difficult, difficult time for Russia.

Comrade Supreme Commander!

We are ready to perform any tasks set by you, not only at the front, where the extraction of the desired by means of weapons takes place, but also on the cultural front. Based on this, I ask you to consider the possibility of creating a development program for participants and veterans of a special military operation in the field of culture and art.

Thank you.

Vladimir Putin: Thank you very much.

Thank you for what you are doing and have been doing both in the framework of the special military operation and now for your creativity.

How many such cases were there during the Great Patriotic War, right? The Soviet leadership, by the way, tried to protect our artists, sent them to evacuation and so on. This is well known to everyone. Many, however, volunteered to go to the front and died, very young people. Some of them have written one or two works in their entire lives. When you read them, you get to know them... some of the songs are written like folk songs, the words are folk—but in fact they have authors. Unfortunately, they passed away, died at the front. Because cultural figures are also part of our people, who live together with the people, fight together with the people, achieve victories together with the people and contribute to achieving these victories, because creativity inspires people.

How many wonderful songs were born during the Great Patriotic War, which we still sing, and do with pleasure, and films, and paintings, and music, and so on. You know, all this was born because creative people faced absolutely unique situations in their lives. And it encouraged them to speak out, write, or write music. I think everyone knows: "Crossing, crossing! Left bank, right bank, rough snow, ice edge… To whom glory, to whom dark water... " And immediately images are born in my head.

It is important. So, of course, we will do everything to support such–-excuse me, I will say--such guys as you--talented, young, charged with helping the country, helping those people who are close to us, and who not only with the help of weapons, but also with the help of their talent bring victory closer.

Thank you. We will definitely think about it.

Sergey Lobanov: Thank You, Comrade Supreme Commander.

Vladimir Putin: Thank you very much.

Daria Dmitrieva: And now I want to pass the floor to another young talent-–my colleague, a lecturer, with whom we once performed side by side at the contest "Knowledge. Lecturer", to Mikhail Domanin.

Mikhail Domanin: Hello, dear Vladimir Vladimirovich!

My name is Domanin Mikhail. I am 17 years old and originally from Chelyabinsk. I'm also a lecturer, as Daria mentioned. I became interested in history in the second grade when I accidentally came across a series of films about the Great Patriotic War "The Great War" on the Internet. I enjoyed telling my peers, even the older kids, about it.

An even bigger discovery for me occurred when I learned about the contest "Knowledge. Lecturer". I passed the competition, made my first lecture, and now I have a mentor from among the lecturers of "Knowledge"–-Stanislav Amanov. He's also a historian. And you know, we communicate with him as colleagues. I am also proud that I am a lecturer, and I am proud that I firmly follow the precepts of Sergey Ivanovich [Vavilov]. But, in my opinion, most of the work of the lecturer always remains behind the scenes, because for each lecture, in fact, hours of real preparation and sincere enthusiasm for the work of the educator.

And here's what I thought: a lecturer can be compared to a donor. But if the donor saves lives physically, then the lecturer does it on a mental level: he saves our mind, as you noted, brings knowledge to our hearts, makes it part of our soul. In my opinion, it is important to mention those people who achieve great success in this business, but there are no awards at the national level that would reflect such work.

Tell me, how much is it possible for a title or reward to appear for the guides of real knowledge? For example, "honored educator".

Thank you.

Vladimir Putin: Good idea. I have nothing to add. We have many titles of "honored worker" of such and such sphere. But this is a very important area of activity, as I have already said, 30 thousand people now work only in the system of the Znanie society, and in fact there are many more of them. You mentioned your mentor. Tell me again, who is it?

Mikhail Domanin: Stanislav Amanov is a historian.

Vladimir Putin: How old is he?

Mikhail Domanin: Approximately, as Alexander Sergeyevich Pushkin said, the graces are not yet on vacation and Lyubov is retired.

Vladimir Putin: Yes. But he's an adult now, a historian.

Mikhail Domanin: Yes.

Vladimir Putin: Did you notice what you said when you talked about yourself? You said, " He is also a historian." I was very pleased with this, because you consider yourself… How old are you?"

M. Domanin: 17.

Vladimir Putin: 17. You see, you are quite a young man, but you already consider yourself a historian. I don't want to give an assessment of your knowledge and achievements in this very important field right now. But the fact that you consider yourself a historian is already great, it is already a victory for your mentor. It's great. And I hope that you will continue to be at least interested in this field of activity, the field of science, and make your own contribution to the development of history. History is not a science about the past, it is a science about the future. This is a very important part of our life.

I want to wish you every success. And thank you for the idea, we will try to implement it.

Thank you.

Mikhail Dreval: Our compatriots abroad today, more than ever, feel the need to preserve the historical truth. I would like to give the floor to the coordinator of the Immortal Regiment movement in Spain, Victoria Samoilova–-one of those who were not afraid to speak out in defense of their country.

Victoria.

V. Samoilova: Hello, Vladimir Vladimirovich!

Victoria Samoilova, coordinator of the Immortal Regiment.

Vladimir Putin: Is Buenos dias correct?

V. Samoilova: That's right.

Indeed, in recent years our "Immortal Regiment" in Spain is one of the largest in Europe. In general, the international movement "Immortal Regiment" was born in 2013, and the action very quickly began to spread around the world, because people in it feel unity and a reminder of the common historical past, in which that Great Victory against Nazism took place.

In recent years, our coordinators have experienced huge obstacles, but despite everything, thanks to their courage, our courage, "Immortal Regiments" are held all over the world and in different formats. And often this becomes possible, including thanks to local residents.

For example, in Spain last year, one of the cities refused to hold an action, and the Spaniards quickly organized a motorcycle rally on their own behalf, so we were able to carry portraits of our heroes, including Spanish heroes who fought in the Red Army, and the Victory Banner, of course.

At the beginning of April, here at the Victory Museum, we met with the Immortal Regiment coordinators from 52 countries and planned a large-scale celebration of the campaign all over the world, in more than 100 countries. We will continue to make every effort to preserve historical memory.

Dear Vladimir Vladimirovich,

Our coordinators have a dream to meet you, tell you about their work, which is not easy, especially in recent years, and personally thank you for your support in preserving justice and historical truth. I very much hope that such a meeting will take place.

Vladimir Putin: First of all, Victoria, I would like to thank you for devoting your time and even fighting to promote what you believe to be true, what constitutes your beliefs and your inner world, namely objective knowledge about the Second World War in Europe…

You live in Spain, right?

V. Samoilova: Yes.

Vladimir Putin: And in Spain. In Europe as a whole, there are a lot of people who share our position. Very much. Someone is silent, someone very modestly declares something, so that they are not particularly heard. Of course, there are not many people who, under pressure from the official authorities, have the audacity to express their point of view, and even not only express it, but show that they have it, this is their own point of view. This happens for so many reasons.

The current situation in European countries... we won't go into details now, it will require a separate meeting, and I can talk a lot about it. I just want to say, as I have already said in relation to France: I repeat, there was such a figure there, Marshal Petain, but there were others, such as General de Gaulle. And although the marshal was a hero of the First World War, but in relation to the situation that developed after the defeat of France, he behaved differently: he actually turned part of France into a satellite of Nazi Germany. But there were also those like not Marshal, but General de Gaulle, who created the "Unconquered France" movement, who created all the conditions for the struggle

It was the same in Spain. We know very well the period of the 1930s, when the Spanish people fought against the rise to power of the fascist dictatorship. We know very well how it all started, with the famous message on the radio: "Cloudless skies over all of Spain." The Nazi coup began. A lot of Spanish patriots were fighting back then, and the Soviet Union was helping to fight Nazism in Spain.

The situation is even more complicated now than it was then. Then everything was clearer: white, black or brown, say, red and brown. It may be more difficult now. But it is all the more important when people like you understand, firstly, what is happening, and secondly, have the courage and courage to clearly state it.

I have no doubt that sooner or later our relations with Europe will be restored. This is absolutely true. This includes relying on people like you, and people who were both born and raised in Spain–-and some Spaniards were born and raised in the Soviet Union, these are the children of just those families who moved to the Soviet Union during the Civil War. There we have someone to lean on.

But it is very important that even at this very difficult moment, I repeat, there are people like you who have the courage to express their attitude to the events taking place today, and even more so to give an assessment of what happened during the Second World War.

As for the meeting–-I will do it with pleasure. You just need to choose the time and format. Please send my best wishes to all those who work with you in this noble cause–-defending the truth about World War II.

Thank you very much.

Daria Dmitrieva: Mr President, there are some young people among us whose lives have been greatly transformed by the return of their native regions to our state.

I want to give the floor to Olga Pashentseva, an activist of the Movement of the First from the Donetsk People's Republic.

Olga Pashentseva: Good afternoon!

My name is Olga Pashentseva, I am 17 years old, I am from the city of Torez, Donetsk People's Republic. I am a volunteer guide of the school museum of military glory.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, I would like to express my deep gratitude to you. After the reunification with Russia, our life, the life of young people has significantly changed–-new opportunities, various projects, trips and acquaintances with children from all over the country have become available. I have already managed to visit Artek, Smena and become a member of the flagship projects of the Movement of the First.

Cities and schools were also transformed by patron regions after the reunification. Moreover, each school has thematic spaces, zones where children can learn about public organizations, competitions, projects, and also register in them immediately thanks to QR codes. But, after talking with children from other regions, unfortunately, I found out that not all schools have such thematic zones. And I think it would be great if such spaces appeared in all schools in Russia.

Vladimir Putin: First of all, Olya, I would like to thank you for working at the school museum. This is the first one. I hope you are not alone there; your peers, fellow students, and schoolmates are probably there. This is very important because you are a) doing a good job yourself and b) You help others of your age get the information they need, which is very important for the so-called our historical, new regions.

You are still quite young, but nevertheless, for sure, all this is still preserved in your memory, what happened when this regime came to power, which still rules in Kiev, and how things of a nationalistic nature were imposed.

Nationalism is the first stage to Nazism, it is the first step, nationalism. Because nationalism is based not just on love for the representatives of one's own ethnic group, but on hatred for others–-that is the essence of nationalism. Patriotism is a different matter altogether. To love your homeland does not mean to hate others. And nationalism is fueled precisely by this—hatred of other countries and other peoples.

And our task is to educate ourselves and the whole world around us in love for each other, namely in love for each other. This is the basis of the universe. Even if we see that something is happening around us that requires our assessment, we should do it first of all in the most objective way, based not on any phobias, but on real facts.

When you present these facts in the school museum, when you systematize them and present them correctly and beautifully, including not only with the help of drawings and documents, which is very important (it is important that the information is objective), but, perhaps, with the help of some modern means of transmitting information, so, to make it interesting for your fellow students, your schoolmates, then you will achieve the maximum effect.

As for these spaces that you mentioned, I completely agree with you: it is very important that everything is in full view. And indeed, where this is possible (probably not everywhere else is possible, including in the Donetsk People's Republic, in the Luhansk, Zaporozhye region or in the Kherson region), but where it is possible, of course, it should be done.

But not only here, but in the whole country, of course, these spaces should be used to the maximum benefit–-both from the point of view of patriotic education, and from the point of view of simply conveying some useful information to people who live in this space and spend a significant part of their lives. And students today spend most of their time in schools, probably, especially if we keep in mind extracurricular activities, most of the day there. So this is very important.

I will definitely talk to the Minister of Education about this.

Thank you.

Olga Pashentseva: Thank you very much.

Vladimir Putin: Thank you for the idea.

Daria Dmitrieva: Mr President, today many of us have shared the stories of our ancestors, [stories] about representatives of our own kind. In our country, there are people for whom the concepts of "family" and" Homeland " do not just have a common root.

I want to give the floor to Elena Vinogradova, representative of the Committee of Families of Soldiers of the Fatherland.

Elena Vinogradova: Good afternoon, Mr President!

Today there are so many stories about our ancestors. How similar they are to the stories of our husbands and sons.

The Committee of Families of Soldiers of the Fatherland pays great attention to patriotic education.

We are a nation of winners. For so many years they tried to convince us that our Great Victory was the merit of the past, and then we heard that the Victory was not ours either. Who is broadcasting this to us? A nation of losers that has lost on all fronts in this entire period. And we can see what's going on there. Thanks to this, we, mothers and wives, although it may be difficult for us, but we understand the importance, significance and timeliness of a special military operation.

There are heroes in my family, too. One of them is Nikolai Romanov, my grandfather, a participant in the Great Patriotic War. 18 awards. He received the first medal "For Bravery"at the age of 18.

My grandfather lived a long and happy life and wrote a parting biography for his great-grandchildren. There are such lines: "Dear great-grandchild, be worthy of the memory of your grandfather Nikolai Romanov, keep and protect the honor and dignity of our family."

My son fulfills the precepts of his great-grandfather. He is a member of a special military operation. Like my grandfather, he is an artilleryman who has been performing combat missions in the Zaporizhia direction since 2022.

Looking at the connection between generations, a project was born in our family, it is called "I remember your feat, dear!” This project has already become a popular action, and thousands of families from all over our country have shared their stories.

I took a sample with me to show you.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, the fact is that for us, the Committee of Families of Soldiers of the Fatherland, it is very important that it is developed, broadcast in educational institutions, in television formats. Because we will do everything possible so that our future generations do not become "Ivans who do not remember their kinship", as is happening now there [in Ukraine]: they have forgotten everything, and they have forgotten their homeland, and their heroic grandfathers.

So please support our project.

Vladimir Putin: Absolutely.

What would you like to say? What you have just mentioned is very important, and I also mentioned it during our meeting–-this link between generations is of fundamental importance. It's very important what we feel.

Tell me again, what is it called, "grandfather behind your back", how does it sound?

E. Vinogradova: "I remember your feat, dear! Grandfather is behind me!"

And we saw [in the excerpt of the film "Not listed"] on the screen–-behind that fighter were his comrades. And here [on the cover of the booklet] are our own grandfathers, and in one line they continue the battle against Nazism on their territory.

Vladimir Putin: Absolutely, absolutely.

Very good idea, and the project is great. We will definitely support you. I'll see how to do it, in what ways, where, what, and how, but not necessarily, because this new product is of fundamental importance. And working in this format, as a rule, brings maximum results.

Now about what you said—that the losing nations are trying to distort history. If you'll excuse me, I'll say a few words to that effect. Here is the girl Victoria from Spain. Here we talked about France. You can also say about other countries, Germany is constantly being played here. You know, in the period before the Great Patriotic War, before the Second World War, we had very good relations with Germany. This was all ideological in nature, but the Communist Party of Germany was one of the most powerful political forces in Germany after the First World War, the Weimar Republic later, and in general. They had very strong ties with the Soviet Union. They were the first victims of Nazism. And then for many years, during the Great Patriotic War, we had a steady reliance on these forces, which, of course, were destroyed, and in many ways destroyed. A well–-known group that our intelligence service relied on is Krasnaya Kapella [Red Orchestra]. Its representatives worked in all the organs of Nazi Germany, even in the Gestapo. These are people who, as one of the historians wrote, selflessly served their ideological Homeland--the Soviet Union.

And when the war began, of course, everything was so acute and everything was on the verge of survival of the country and nation–-or the nations that made up the Soviet Union at that time--that then, of course, there were other, tough slogans, including on posters: "Kill the German!" Because everything became so tough It is clear that this also required such rigidity in propaganda.

Today, when we see tanks with German-made crosses in Ukraine, of course, some associations arise here. Unfortunately, there is no escape from this.

Of course, what you said is true–-the losing nations are trying to impose and distort something on us. Now I will tell you why, but I think that everyone understands it anyway.

And we are certainly a nation of winners, a nation in the broadest sense of the word. When I say "nation", I mean all the peoples, all the ethnic groups of the former Soviet Union–-and Russia, of course.

But I would also talk about the winners 'generation and the winners' international. And today we need this international. We need to work with people who think the same way we do in Europe and North America. There are many of them, and we need to combine our efforts.

But, of course, the core, the foundation–-the Victory is based, of course, on the exploits of our people, first of all. And we, being Russians, Tatars, Jews, I don't know, Mordovians, whatever, Chechens, Dagestanis–-we should first of all, of course, talk about this.

Why is someone from another international, the "brown international", so insistently supporting neo-Nazism, in this case in Ukraine, and trying to dissolve the memory of the exploits of our people, of the exploits of our ancestors, grandfathers and great-grandfathers? Why? Because this purging of historical memory dissolves us, it makes us lose our identity, which means that we lose our inner unity and strength, the unity of our people. A nation that has no past has no future. And this attempt to "dissolve" us all in some kind of amorphous state is not accidental–-it is a purposeful work, in this case against our country, against Russia and against the peoples of the Russian Federation.

And your work and your project, of course, are aimed at preventing these attacks and, on the contrary, strengthening our unity, strengthening our self-consciousness, our identity, and therefore our internal sovereignty.

We will definitely support your project. thank you very much.

M. Dreval: Most of the historical truth is preserved in archives. I would like to give the floor to Artyom Beloglazov, a professional historian who skillfully works with archival documents.

Alexander Beloglazov: Hello, Mr President!

My name is Artem Beloglazov. I am a historian, engaged in historical and archival expertise and have long been involved in the project "No statute of limitations".

I am concerned about a very important issue: the problem of recognizing the genocide of the Soviet people at the international level.

In our country, 34 trials were held that recognized the crimes of the Nazis in the occupied territory of the USSR as genocide of the Soviet people. A huge number of documents have been declassified that confirm the monstrous nature of the war waged against us by Nazi Germany.

However, it is very common to hear at the international level that the systematic extermination of our compatriots is not genocide.

For example, the siege of Leningrad–-an act of genocide planned by the Germans, during which more than a million Soviet citizens died, mostly from starvation–-is translated into a foreign language as "siege of the city", which fundamentally replaces the essence of this crime.

My colleagues and I from the National Center for Historical Memory prepared an exhibition entitled "The Siege of Leningrad: The Genocide of the Soviet people during the Great Patriotic War", where we called a spade a spade. It has been exhibited in Moscow, St. Petersburg, on the territory of the Piskarevsky cemetery, as well as at the international level, in particular at the UN Security Council, and will be opened in Geneva to show what our compatriots really went through.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, please tell me how you respond to attempts by other countries to rewrite the history of the Great Patriotic War. And how to counteract the falsification of history at the level of the younger generation? Also, what prospects do you see for international recognition of the genocide of the Soviet people?

Vladimir Putin: First, we draw on the decisions and conclusions of the Nuremberg trials. There everything is basically called by its proper name. They try to forget it, drown it out, obscure it. At the level of our official authorities, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, this work is carried out constantly. But it certainly can and will be successful only if people like you, those who have gathered here today, and your like-minded people all over the country will constantly raise these issues.

And this is not an empty job, it is not a search for enemies in the past; it is a way to convey to ourselves-–and to our people, and to the whole world the realities of the events that took place then, because these realities largely explain our behavior today. This is very important, it is of practical importance, I can tell you for sure, because we hear, and I sometimes hear from my foreign colleagues, even those who, to put it mildly, do not sympathize with what we are doing in defending our interests, they say: well, yes, of course, the Soviet Union and the Soviet states people have suffered so much, of course, you have the right to think about protecting your interests and ensuring your safety today and for a long historical perspective. This has practical implications. Therefore, we will work on this both through the state and public organizations. I support the projects that have just been mentioned, and all that we are talking about here.

Together, only together will we achieve the desired result. We'll keep working.

Alexander Beloglazov: Thank you.

Daria Dmitrieva: Mr President, we see that now, just as during the Great Patriotic War, the whole country is helping the front. I believe that the desire to help is a trait that lies not just in the cultural code, but in the genetic code of our people.

I want to give the floor to Angelina Uzhikovskaya, a volunteer and student of Kursk State University.

A. Uzhikovskaya: Hello, Mr President!

First of all, I would like to congratulate all of us on the long-awaited liberation of the Kursk region from the occupation of Ukrainian military units. Thank you very much for the comprehensive state support for temporary migrants.

From the first day of the invasion, I myself, together with the team of the Young Guard of United Russia, helped the affected residents. We worked in temporary accommodation centers, humanitarian centers, and warehouses. Volunteers from all over the country came to the Kursk region to help. Some of them were engaged in extremely important and dangerous work: they helped evacuate civilians from the occupied territories. Unfortunately, not all of them returned.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, volunteer work in the Kursk region has become a symbol of national unity. Therefore, I ask you to consider creating a memorial dedicated to the volunteers of the special military operation in my native region.

Thank you.

Vladimir Putin: First of all, I would like to thank you and all those who have worked with you and are still working together during this difficult time. It did not end–-yes, the enemy was kicked out of the Kursk region, but there are still cracks in some of them, they are still sitting in some basements. We hear what they say there: they ask for evacuation. I won't go into the details right now. It is impossible to evacuate, because there are scattered groups of two or three people, I repeat, sitting somewhere in the woods, in some burrows, in complete isolation.

By the way, they are offered to surrender. Some were taken prisoner and sent back to where their colleagues are sitting, with an offer to lay down their weapons. Not an isolated case, just a few days ago.

As for the volunteers, after all… You know, this is just how search engines work. And volunteers... of course, the volunteer movement is developed all over the world, but it has acquired a special character in our country. We have special people after all. We have very young people who are just starting out in life so imbued with a sense of duty, responsibility and awareness of the importance of what they are doing that they do not feel sorry for themselves.

First of all, I would like to appeal to you, and I hope that your comrades will hear me, to exercise maximum caution. Unfortunately, I am aware of this, and there are also losses among volunteers. We will do our best to support you.

Did you suggest creating a memorial? So let's do it.

So let's do it.

A. Uzhikovskaya: Thank you very much.

Mikhail Dreval: Mr President, I know you have a very busy schedule. Do you have time to listen to one more participant?

Vladimir Putin: Come on.

Daria Dmitrieva: Today we have a young poet Nikita Gogolev with us.

Nikolai Gogolev: Good afternoon, Mr President!

I am Nikita Gogolev, I am 13 years old, Stavropol Territory, Pyatigorsk.

All people have something in common. For example, I also practice judo and was born in October, just like you. Now all of us, as our ancestors once did, have united for the common defense of the Motherland, each in his own place. I write poetry and believe that creativity should help us remember what is important.

Let me read an excerpt from my poem written for the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory.

Vladimir Putin: Please.

N. Gogolev: I hear the fanfare of Victory, as my great-grandfather once did.

Young guys are walking along Krasnaya Square with an orchestra.

Go, as then, in the 45th, the soldiers of our Victory.

And great-grandfathers are proud of them, and the enemy is not terrible at all.

There are young heroes in the ranks, and they have Russia behind them.

And there is no doubt--the victory will be ours,

And the enemy will be defeated again, and the peaceful sky above us,

As a symbol of the Great Victory, fireworks will be painted with flowers!

(Applause.)

Vladimir Vladimirovich, meeting you was a long-standing dream for me.

Thank you.

Vladimir Putin: Thank you very much. I really hope that you will continue… Please sit down.

Nikolai Gogolev: Mr President, I was born and raised in the Caucasus. We have a custom that when the older ones speak, the younger ones stand.

Vladimir Putin: Good. The Caucasus has its own traditions. We treat them with great respect, because they largely shape the character of those people who live in this wonderful corner of our country.

I would like to wish you success in your work. I hope that you will continue to follow this path. What we've all heard is impressive, without a doubt.

How old are you?"

N. Gogolev: 13

Vladimir Putin: 13 years old. You see, a very young man, and such things are patriotic [you compose], and how beautifully you present them. I would very much like to see this spread more widely. We will definitely… I will think about it myself, how to make sure that as many people as possible learn about your work not only from your peers, but also from the citizens of our country in general. Thank you for thinking about it.

What do your parents do?

Nikolai Gogolev: My mother is an economist, she used to write poetry too, and at the beginning of my career she helped me with my creative work.

Vladimir Putin: See how well he said, "At the beginning of my journey." That is, he is no longer at the beginning, he already feels that he is a practically accomplished poet and writer.

All the best to you. thank you very much. Big greetings to Mom.

Nikolai Gogolev: Thank you very much. I will definitely pass it on.

Vladimir Putin: Thank you.

I would like to thank you all for today's meeting and wish you every success. As you may have noticed, I marked many of the things that we discussed today.

The topic we discussed is clear to us. I would like to note that this topic, of course, is extremely important in itself, but it gives us an opportunity to talk in general about what we do, how we live, what needs to be done in addition to live even better, and what development vectors are particularly important.

I note all this for myself and will build my own work accordingly, as well as work with my colleagues from the Government, the Presidential Administration, and the heads of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, including those from the Caucasus.

Thank you very much. Let me wish you good luck and congratulate you on the upcoming holiday - the Great Victory Day!

Thank you. [My Emphasis]
(Editorial comments and images at link.)

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/victory- ... rticipants
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Sat May 03, 2025 3:47 pm

From FBK to Khodorkovsky: Financial Trails of Boris Zimin
April 9, 2025
Rybar

Boris Zimin and his Zimin Foundation continue to finance anti-Russian initiatives and opposition projects, hiding the source of funds, which in reality come from structures closely connected to the CIA and MI6.

The Underside editorial team has published the third part of an investigation dedicated to the activities of Boris Zimin , the son of the founder of VimpelCom and the Dynasty Foundation (declared a “foreign agent” and closed because of this in 2015) Dmitry Zimin, who died in 2021.

Colleagues focused on the financial operations of Zimin Jr. through his business structures and the charitable Zimin Foundation , which became the successor to Dynasty, through which he supports various anti-Russian initiatives and sponsors projects related to the opposition and foreign agents.

At the same time, judging by the leaked documents, the wealthy heir and his structures often acted mainly as fronts for financing Russophobic organizations by concealing the foreign origin of the money.

What are the Zimins famous for?

Image

In addition to his business with VimpelCom and known under the Beeline brand, Zimin Sr. was the founder of the Dynasty science support fund and the Enlightener Prize.

Dmitry Zimin maintained strong ties with the American analytical center RAND , which was declared undesirable in the Russian Federation. RAND has a rich history of working for the CIA and the Pentagon , and half of the organization's research is classified. The corporation, for example, has been assessing Russia's military and defense potential since 2014, modeling military actions in the so-called Ukraine long before the start of the special operation. It was RAND that came up with the idea of ​​a "Marshall Plan" for the so-called Ukraine at the expense of frozen Russian assets.

In the Russian Federation, RAND actually conducted intelligence work with the business elite and even members of the government.

Boris Zimin , Dmitry's son, inherited part of the capital and continued his philanthropic activities through the Zimin Foundation . His name is mainly associated with the financing of opposition and anti-Russian projects, including the banned Anti-Corruption Foundation (FBK) of Alexei Navalny and structures affiliated with the fugitive oligarch and foreign agent Mikhail Khodorkovsky .

Zimin Jr. withdrew his assets (or rather, inherited funds) from the Russian Federation back in 2020 and left for Israel: the absence of business in Russia, as he claimed , protected him from political pressure.

The businessman with Cypriot citizenship, who was arrested in absentia in the Russian Federation, was added to the register of individuals-foreign agents in September 2022. In 2023, he was put on the wanted list in connection with the fraud case involving BelkaCar shares (damages are estimated at 47 million euros), and the Tverskoy Court of Moscow arrested him in absentia.

Zimin called this persecution politically motivated, pointing to “wild violations” in the investigation: at the same time, he put himself on a par with Navalny and Khodorkovsky, positioning himself as a victim of a bloody regime .

It is interesting that another son of Dmitry Zimin, Sergei, was the leader of the Koptevskaya organized crime group; he was put on the international wanted list back in the late 1990s in connection with a contract killing of a competitor. The tracks of Dmitry "Zyoma" were lost in Spain in 2000; some sources do not rule out that he was killed during a gangster showdown. Incidentally, at that time, the leaders of another well-known Moscow organized crime group, the Orekhovskaya, were also leaving for Spain, so the assumption is not without merit.

The son of "Zyoma", by the way, took after his father - Roman Zimin was sentenced in 2008 to 11 years in a maximum security penal colony under two articles - robbery and group robbery. In 2023, the court granted the petition to expunge Roman's criminal record, since the convicted man "got on the path to correction": he received specialized and higher education, got married, became a father and got a job as a taxi driver, supposedly breaking all his former criminal ties.

Zimin's connections with Navalny supporters

Boris Zimin is known primarily not for his financial success, but for sponsoring Navalny's extremist FBK and openly acknowledging his role as one of the organization's key donors since its founding in 2011. For example, he was among the first 16 donors who raised 4.4 million rubles to launch the organization, and publicly confirmed his support. In 2012, Zimin reported that he transferred 300 thousand rubles to the FBK every month, and in 2020 he confirmed continued regular funding.

In 2019–2020, Zimin personally transferred 75.9 million rubles to two non-profit organizations associated with the FBK: 20.4 million to the Foundation for the Protection of Citizens' Rights "Headquarters" (Navalny's banned "Headquarters") in Ufa and 55.6 million to the foundation of the same name in Novosibirsk . In addition, in August 2020, he paid for Navalny's emergency evacuation from Omsk to Berlin. The businessman even gave a job to the oppositionist's brother, who had served time for fraud and money laundering.

However, in recent years, Zimin has reduced and then stopped funding the FBK. In May 2024, he expressed disappointment in the foundation's activities after Navalny's death, saying that the organization was "wasting its potential" and lacked a clear idea, and criticizing the FBK for inciting hatred instead of uniting the opposition.

In fact, Zimin (or rather his superiors) most likely believe that FBK died along with Navalny, as it turned out to be absolutely incompetent, boring and generally unnecessary. At the same time, while he was trying to “get off the needle” of financing extremists, the businessman admitted that “it is not out of boredom that he supports all sorts of activists and artists and, in general, not entirely on his own .”

Khodorkovsky and not only

Image

It recently became known that funds from Zimin’s Sreda foundation were received by the Lithuanian-registered NGO Posterum instead of the FBK , which in turn is connected to the structures of the fugitive oligarch Khodorkovsky , who is mired in working for the West, including through the Future of Russia Foundation .

Zimin is connected to Khodorkovsky through the financing of a number of other projects, as well as through the intersection of their interests in supporting opposition and anti-Russian initiatives, although no direct close cooperation between them has been recorded.

For example, in September 2022, the Zimin Foundation allocated $35,000 to the foreign agent project “ Ark ,” which is affiliated with Khodorkovsky and aimed at coordinating the Russian opposition abroad, including to form a protest movement. At the same time, Zimin acts through a complex network of trusted persons and offshore structures.

In February 2022, Zimin also joined an undesirable organization, the Khodorkovsky Anti-War Committee. The Committee actively supports the separatist " Free Russia Forum " (recognized as undesirable), which advocates the collapse of the Russian Federation and its transition to Western control, and also supports the Armed Forces of Ukraine, including financially.

This list can be continued for quite a long time: a fugitive oligarch, with the support of European and Western structures (including financial) spends a lot of money on a lot of movements and projects, only some of which, in fact, represent any serious initiative. However, the mass character of such organizations should not so much cause concern as serious opposition to their activities.

In addition, Zimin became a member of the board of trustees of the Boris Nemtsov Foundation , another Russophobic organization with which Khodorkovsky and Michael McFaul are associated . The foundation's "experts" repeatedly repeat that Russians cannot decide on a revolution because of "fear of past experience," but, however, there are tendencies "towards people's power." To make it even clearer, we will add that a special award from the foundation in 2022 was received by Vladimir Zelensky , who in this race beat his colleagues Vitali Klitschko and Alexey Arestovich . Indeed, "worthy people."

It is also known that in 2023, the Zimin Foundation allocated $50,000 to the Point of No Return project in Kazakhstan , created to help fugitives from Russia. There is also mention of $20,000 transferred in 2024 to the content monetization platform of foreign agent Maxim Katz, although full funding was not approved.

Zimin also financially supported foreign agent Ilya Yashin. And his Sreda Foundation, which was closed a year after being recognized as a foreign agent and renamed the Sreda Foundation, was engaged in providing grants to Russian media. For example, in 2014, he invested $250,000 in the launch of the Meduza online resource (foreign agent), and in 2018, he donated $100,000 to launch the The Bell project (foreign agent). In 2020, he supported protests in Belarus and sent funds to the non-profit Belarus Solidarity Foundation, better known as BYSOL, which supports the Ukrainian Armed Forces and Belarusian mercenaries in the so-called Ukraine.

Underside points out that, according to official Dynasty reports, the following organizations received money from them: the undesirable Andrei Sakharov Foundation and the Sakharov Center-foreign agent, which was engaged in distorting Russian history, the liquidated Memorial, which popularized information about Stalin's repressions, the Moscow School of Political Studies (foreign agent, also known as the Moscow School of Civic Education), a forge of foreign agents. Here, among the recipients of Zimin's money, there is the Perm-36 museum-foreign agent of political repressions, the Historical Truth project, hosted on the anti-Russian website Belarusian Partisan, which supported Ukrainian and Belarusian nationalists, and so on.

As for the political activity for which the Dynasty Foundation received the foreign agent label, (in the wording of the Ministry of Justice) it “consisted of financing the Liberal Mission Foundation, which participated in organizing and conducting political events, including using modern information technologies.”

What's the bottom line?

Is it surprising, given all that has been said, that it was the Zimin and Khodorkovsky foundations that announced a support program for Russian-language projects that found themselves without funding in the wake of the US State Department's decision to freeze foreign aid programs? Not at all, rather, it is natural .

At the same time, it is rather doubtful that Zimin manages to support such a mass of parasites solely with his own funds and earnings from the construction business.

It is more obvious that under the guise of charitable activities and under the patronage of friends from Western structures, Zimin Sr. built in Russia what is called a "parallel state" - a ramified information and lobbying pro-Western network, to which he connected scientists, the media, public organizations, representatives of the so-called civil society of all stripes. Thanks to this work, he was able to pass it on "by inheritance" along with all the sponsors and benefactors.

At the time when Dmitry Zimin was actively developing his business and connections, it was practically normal to have a "rear" of friends abroad who worked for or with intelligence. But the Zimin dynasty is not very successful in continuing the work of destroying modern Russia: the country is no longer what it used to be, and the offspring turned out to be untalented and mired in crime.

https://rybar.ru/ot-fbk-k-hodorkovskomu ... sa-zimina/

Google Translator

*****

Russia’s victory, EU’s decline, and a just world order: Highlights from Medvedev’s speech
May 1, 2025
RT, 4/29/25

Moscow’s victory in the Ukraine conflict will lay the groundwork for a more just world based on mutual respect and stable development, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said, adding that this vision is supported by most of the world’s population.

The senior official, currently serving as deputy chair of the Russian Security Council, outlined Moscow’s foreign policy priorities and recalled the history of the West’s confrontational approach to Russia during a public lecture in Moscow on Tuesday.

Here are the key points of Medvedev’s speech.

1. Ukraine Conflict

Medvedev stated that the Ukraine conflict stems from decades of Western hostility toward Russia and the fostering of neo-Nazism in Ukraine by the “Anglo-Saxon crowd.” He argued that Russia’s military response was necessary to address these provocations, stating that even US President Donald Trump acknowledged that Washington, Brussels, and Kiev are responsible for the Ukraine crisis which has nearly triggered World War III.

The former president also stressed that Russia’s ultimate goal is to destroy the “Kiev neo-Nazi regime,” not the Ukrainian state itself. He emphasized that Russia would not allow hostile regimes to re-emerge on its borders and called for a complete denazification of Ukraine, as well as Europe.

He also warned that all foreign fighters and any future foreign contingents in Ukraine are legitimate military targets under international law, and promised that war criminals would face justice.

Commenting on Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, Medvedev described him as a “pathological figure” and suggested he would “end very badly.”

He predicted that after the conflict ends, Russia would establish a new national holiday to commemorate its victory in Ukraine which, according to Medvedev, is essential to ensure lasting security.

2. Russia and the West

Medvedev has described Russia’s relationship with the West as a long history of confrontation, rooted in persistent efforts by ”Anglo-Saxon powers” to weaken Russia. He recalled that even during World War II, Britain and the US considered plans to attack the Soviet Union, referencing ”Operation Unthinkable,” which was secretly developed under Winston Churchill’s orders in 1945. Medvedev argued that after the war, the West squandered the chance to build a fair international order, instead creating a system based on double standards, cynicism, and attempts to isolate Russia.

Medvedev stated that while Russia had always sought peaceful coexistence, it now faces a situation where it must counter the West’s ”peace through strength” strategy with its own doctrine of ”peace through fear,” asserting that only the threat of strong retaliation, including nuclear deterrence, can keep the West from taking hostile actions.

At the same time, he rejected claims that Russia might attack Europe, calling them ”nonsense” designed to frighten European populations and justify rampant militarization.

The former president also concluded that Russian-EU relations have passed the ”point of no return,” arguing that there are no independent, strong leaders left on the continent, only ”spineless Russophobic figures” and ”cowardly marionettes.” Medvedev expressed little hope for meaningful dialogue with current EU governments, and suggested that future interaction would be limited or nonexistent. At the same time, he claimed that many ordinary Europeans are growing disillusioned with their leaders’ policies toward Russia.

3. EU’s decline

Medvedev described today’s Western Europe as suffering from “feeblemindedness without courage.” He argued that the continent has abandoned its traditions and fallen under the control of radical, Russophobic leaders.

He claimed that Western Europe is increasingly embracing extremist ideologies and must also undergo a process of denazification alongside Ukraine. Medvedev pointed to the decision by European authorities to invite Ukrainian nationalists – whom he linked to WWII-era Ukrainian far-right leader Stepan Bandera – to the 80th anniversary celebrations of the end of World War II, while deliberately excluding representatives from Russia, calling it an act of profound cynicism.

Medvedev went on to state that the EU is not only politically weak but also morally degraded, lacking any real leadership or strategic independence, and on the verge of collapse. He predicted that the bloc would continue to oppose Donald Trump and traditionalist forces in the US, reflecting a deep ideological split between globalist elites in Europe and rising conservative movements elsewhere in the West.

4. Just world order

The former president suggested that Russia is fighting with “truth and justice” on its side, positioning itself as the defender of genuine international law against Western hypocrisy.

He argued that Russia’s victory in the Ukraine conflict would mark the first step toward the creation of a fair, multipolar world order.

Medvedev claimed that the Western “rules-based order” is illegitimate and called for its replacement with a true international system grounded in mutual respect and real international law. He noted that most of humanity, particularly the Global South, already supports this vision, while acknowledging that creating such a multipolar world would likely take many years.

Medvedev also stated that despite their geopolitical rivalry, Russia and the US do not have to be permanent enemies and argued that pragmatic cooperation between the two countries is crucial for global stability, especially given their roles as the largest nuclear powers and permanent members of the UN Security Council. He expressed cautious hope that dialogue with Washington could resume on a more pragmatic basis, while dismissing the EU as an increasingly irrelevant actor.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/05/rus ... vs-speech/

******

Zilbeltrud was put on the wanted list
May 1, 23:05

Image

Our Dima Bykov has been declared wanted...

The Investigative Committee (IC) of Russia has opened a criminal case against writer and publicist Dmitry Bykov (recognized as a foreign agent in the Russian Federation). This was reported on April 30 by the press service of the department.
"The investigative bodies of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the city of Moscow have opened a criminal case against Dmitry Bykov," the Investigative Committee of Russia wrote on its Telegram channel.
According to the investigation, Bykov is suspected of publicly disseminating knowingly false information about the use of the Armed Forces of Russia (clause "d" of Part 2 of Article 207.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), as well as evading the performance of duties stipulated by the legislation on foreign agents (Part 2 of Article 330.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The issue of declaring Bykov wanted is being considered.

We will not see these characters in Russia for a very long time.
But of course, the elimination of any opportunities for earning money in Russia and on Russia is a more effective measure. Such characters should first of all be punished with the ruble.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9814749.html

Google Translator

******

1945-2025, a world being rebuilt with other key players
Jorge Wozniak

April 30, 2025 , 10:30 am .

Image
The commemoration of the 80th anniversary of Victory Day has a great symbolic and geopolitical significance (Photo: Mildreth Reyes)

80 years after the end of World War II, those who contributed most to the fight against Nazism and fascism join forces.

This May marks another anniversary of the end of World War II on the European front. It is a particularly significant anniversary given the global context in which it is being celebrated, not only because it marks the fourth year of the armed confrontation between Russia and NATO on Ukrainian soil, but also because of the intensification of the crisis of US hegemony on a global scale, with unforeseeable consequences.

Considering only the event of the commemoration, it is imbued with different symbolism in the various European states. In Western countries, the memory of the event involves some formal, purely protocolary commemorations, which always highlight the danger of war and, in this specific context, are likely related to the danger that Russia represents to global peace. In contrast, in some post-Soviet states, especially Russia itself and Belarus, the commemoration has an official and massive character, accentuated by the fact that the date is a national holiday. Furthermore, it is often accompanied by a military parade that serves to pay tribute to the fallen, but also as a demonstration of military power to deter potential enemy invasions.

Undeniably, this war was by far the most destructive of the 20th century's conflicts. It involved all the major powers of the era, their colonial territories—which then covered a large part of the world—and numerous independent states that were forced to align themselves under pressure from Western powers. Although the war was global in scope, not all the states involved suffered its impact equally, hence the diverse memory of the event.

Germany's surrender to the Western Allies took place on May 7 by General Jodl in the French city of Reims, effective the following day; therefore, May 8 is taken in the West as the date of the end of the conflict. However, this was not accepted by the Soviet leadership because it minimized their contribution to the war: they demanded that the Nazi representatives surrender in Berlin in front of the Red Army military commanders. Furthermore, another of Stalin's weighty political arguments was that Jodl was not the highest military authority and, therefore, it could happen, as happened at the end of World War I, that revanchist groups could argue in the future that Germany was not defeated and that "there was a stab in the back" that curtailed victory. Consequently, it was agreed among the Allies that the surrender would be signed the following day in Berlin by Keitel—the top German commander—in front of the highest Soviet military authorities, to be effective as of May 9. For this reason, during the existence of the Soviet Union and now in Russia and some of the post-Soviet states, the date commemorated as the end of the process is this latter date, known in the official calendar as Victory Day.

This discrepancy in commemoration between the Western bloc and Russia is not a minor issue when constructing the memory of the war. If May 8 is taken as the end date, it would seem that the greatest effort of the war to defeat the Axis powers was made by the Western allies; this hegemonic view is reinforced by the propaganda apparatus of the Hollywood film industry, which logically prioritizes events in which the Americans were primarily involved and, to a lesser extent, the rest of the Western allies.

This message, repeated over the decades, reinforces the fact that it is hidden from public opinion that 80 percent of the German armed forces were destroyed on the Soviet front, and that it was this country that suffered the greatest number of casualties, around 27 million people.

The Asian front
On the other hand, although the end of World War II is celebrated in Europe in May, it is also often downplayed that the armed conflict continued for several more months in the "Far East"—seen from Europe and the Americas—against Japan, a power that continued to control large regions of China and all of Korea.

Furthermore, their conclusion is simplified by stating that the war against Japan ended with the use of two atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9, 1945, respectively. Once again, the West downplays the importance of the August 9 Soviet attack on Japanese-controlled territories in Manchuria, Inner Mongolia, North Korea, and the Sakhalin and Kuril Islands. In compliance with the Tehran and Potsdam Agreements, the USSR had committed to entering the war against Japan three months after the end of the war in Europe. This invasion, carried out on the agreed date, deprived Japan of its industrial base and raw materials on the continent, essential for sustaining the war against the Allies. Thus, in the face of the Soviet advance, the surrender of the Japanese authorities to the US guaranteed the preservation of capitalism in the country. Continuing the war implied the possibility of greater territorial losses to the USSR and the consequent change in the socioeconomic system.

Likewise in the West, partly due to the Eurocentric view of the Western media and within specialized academic circles, the level of destruction suffered by China at the hands of Japan, as well as the resistance of the Chinese people to the invasion , is overlooked in analysis . However, part of the invisibility of China's role after the conflict responds to geopolitical needs since the Cold War. At that time, pointing out how terribly destructive the Japanese invasion of China was could lead to demands for reparations for that country—as occurred in Europe with regard to Germany after the defeat—at a time when China was passing under the control of a Communist Party. Furthermore, highlighting Japan's imperialist role before 1945—beyond the obvious reference to Pearl Harbor or the mistreatment of captured white civilians and military personnel—could undermine the alliance that Washington was trying to forge in that country with certain dominant sectors—before and after the war—against the Soviet Union and China itself.

Thus, the examination of the past in Japan was very limited, and this explains the ignorance of almost the entire population regarding the massacres that occurred in China—such as the one in Nanjing, which claimed 300,000 lives, although it was not the only one perpetrated by the Japanese imperial army. Nor was the existence of tens of thousands—some historians speak of hundreds of thousands—of women forced into brothels, the so-called "comfort women," who after the war were presented by the Japanese authorities as voluntary sex workers, made visible. Only after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 did the Japanese authorities begin to acknowledge these facts, although this was not reflected in the textbooks used by Japanese students in schools or universities. And this systematic silence about the past would explain the rise of right-wing movements that deny the terrible imperial past, whose electoral support grows every year.

Something similar occurred in Germany and other Axis-allied countries: the need to unite as many sectors as possible against the communist enemy—later against Russia—led to a silencing of analysis of social support for fascism and the collaboration of a significant portion of the local population with the Nazi occupiers. As an example of this official neglect, in the school textbook used in the early 1990s on German history for the period 1871–1970, the section devoted to the Weimar Republic and Nazism comprised almost 15 percent of the total page count, a minimal amount to explain the causes and characteristics of that regime. Beyond the official attitude in West Germany toward its own past, it is part of a broader context of tolerance shown by the victorious powers in the West toward surviving officials and military personnel of the Nazi regime, some of whom became officials in the new Federal Republic of Germany after 1949; Even Nazi intelligence groups went on to work for Western intelligence services, especially the United States.

In the context of the confrontation with the Soviet bloc, all kinds of aid were welcomed, even that provided by potential war criminals. And this silence about the past—not only in Germany but also in Austria, France, and other countries—could partly explain the rise of the most radical variants of right-wing groups, some openly pro-fascist or revisionist. Only now, when some of these parties appear likely to form a government, are the traditional parties and ruling elites reacting and resorting to mechanisms—some controversial—to outlaw them.

The current context
In an increasingly unpredictable European and international landscape, a new anniversary of Victory Day is about to be celebrated in Moscow. While the 2024 event featured, in addition to Russia's leading political, cultural, and religious figures, leaders of post-Soviet states, as well as the presidents of Cuba, Laos, and Guinea-Bissau, this year its symbolic significance is much greater. The 80th anniversary event began to be conceived in mid-2023, and a committee called "Victory" was organized specifically to plan it. Invitations to participate in the military parade were sent to nearly 20 countries, several of which have already confirmed their attendance, including North Korea.

Aside from the impressive nature of the national and international military parade itself, the political impact of the presence of certain figures on the main stage will be far more significant. On April 15, Kaja Kallas, the European Union's foreign affairs representative, urged member states or candidate countries seeking membership in the organization not to participate in the celebrations in Moscow. Previously, Russia had categorized all states into two groups. Representatives of countries considered "hostile" as of 2022 were not invited to attend, basically almost all leaders of the EU, the US, Canada, Australia, and all those who provide arms to the Ukrainian regime or impose sanctions against Moscow in the current conflict.

In contrast, the remaining "non-hostile" states will participate with their usual diplomatic delegations or special envoys. Thus, a large number of prime ministers and presidents have already confirmed their attendance. Most of these are currently members of the BRICS or seek to join them—a symbol of the growing multipolarity that is replacing the alleged unipolar US hegemony.

Of all the personalities present, the most significant is undoubtedly Chinese President Xi Jinping, who can demonstrate the power of their growing collaboration in the face of pressure from common enemies. In an international landscape marked not only by the conflict in Ukraine but also by the current trade war, this is no small feat. A symbol of changing times: the two countries that suffered the greatest human losses during the war—and which lead the BRICS—are jointly participating in the commemoration of the implications of a world war. And the entire Western world is either excluded or self-excluded from the event.

https://misionverdad.com/opinion/1945-2 ... res-claves

Google Translator

******

Russia May Help Taliban Fight ISIS
colonelcassad
May 3, 1:07 PM

Image

Putin's special representative for Afghanistan, Zamir Kabulov, said Russia could help the Taliban's anti-terrorist efforts to combat ISIS.

1. Not long ago, the Taliban were officially written off as terrorists, although in fact since 2022. So there are no legal obstacles to such relations.

2. The Taliban have abandoned terrorist practices since 2021 (the last terrorist attacks were committed against the troops of the puppet regime of Ghani in the spring-summer of 2021).

3. The greatest danger to the Taliban is the Afghan wilayat of ISIS (aka wilayat Khorasan, banned in the Russian Federation). At one time, it was nurtured by the Americans, which was confirmed by both the Taliban and former Afghan President Hamid Karzai).
Bloody terrorist attacks organized by ISIS occur quite regularly in Afghanistan. The Taliban are hunting for "black" ones and in most cases do not take prisoners.

4. Russia has repeatedly made it clear that in order to further legalize the Taliban, it needs to strengthen the fight against drug production and the fight against ISIS and Al-Qaeda structures.

5. Thus, the Russian Federation and the Taliban actually have a common enemy in the form of ISIS. In this matter, cooperation between the special services seems possible, since we are interested in the Taliban killing more ISIS members and not having them travel from there to us or to Central Asia.

6. In theory, they can start with an exchange of intelligence and agreements on the mutual extradition of terrorists.

7. In the future, we can, of course, consider the issue of sending a Taliban army corps to force the Dnieper.<sic>

In general, I think there will be a lot of interesting news in the coming year regarding contacts with the Taliban.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9817200.html

Google Translator

'Fight them there so we don't have to fight them here' has a lot more relevance for Russia.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Sun May 04, 2025 5:08 pm

THE SUMMIT IN THE SAND – PUTIN AGREES TO MEET TRUMP IN ABU DHABI ON MAY 15-16

Image
by John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

After the Victory Day celebration later this week, President Vladimir Putin has agreed to hold a summit meeting with President Donald Trump. “The Americans have repeatedly asked for a summit and the Kremlin has finally decided,” according to a reliable Moscow source, “that there is no need to spurn the extended hand.”

The source believes Abu Dhabi, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), is the likely location. Preparatory discussions were held last week in Moscow when Putin telephoned the UAE President, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The Kremlin communiqué claimed “the current state of Russia-UAE relations…constitute a strategic partnership and…enables ongoing dialogue even on the most sensitive international issues.” That was on May 1. The next day Putin met with Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, one of the President’s sons and his personal security chief, titled deputy prime minister.

The Moscow source says “the messages have been sent that it will not be a conclusive deal, only a meeting. This is a climb-down from the previous, public Russian position that a lot of work needs to be done first, before a presidential summit, by specialists. The Russians have understood there are no specialists on the US side yet, and the opportunity is right to shake hands first, then work out the details later.”

The White House press spokesman has announced Trump “will travel to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates [in this order] from May 13th, until May 16th.”

“It’s a display of the Russian hand of friendship and mutual security,” the Moscow source adds. “The Americans are offering nothing concrete but we believe Trump is disposed to giving Russia the security steps it needs.”

The source says the Kremlin is “neither surprised nor disappointed” at Trump’s May 1 tweet declaring that “many of our allies and friends are celebrating May 8th as Victory Day, but we did more than any other Country, by far, in producing a victorious result on World War II.” “It shows you how foolish the Kremlin faction was which has advocated inviting Trump to Red Square for May 9. Putin will give Trump his PR opportunity – but in the sand, not in Red Square.”

The shift in the Moscow consensus – from resistance on the part of the General Staff, the intelligence agencies, and the Foreign Ministry – has followed remarks by Vice President JD Vance. “It’s going to be up to them [Russia and Ukraine] to come to agreement and stop this brutal, brutal conflict,” he said on Friday (May 2). “It’s not going anywhere right [now]. It’s not going to end any time soon…Look, I am optimistic, but it’s hard to say…confident because the Russians and the Ukrainians – they’re the ones who have to take the final step. We got ‘em talkin’. We got ‘em offering peace proposals. We got the minerals deal done. I think we’re in a place where they’ve got to say we’re done with the fighting…but only Russia and Ukraine can make that decision. That’s not something even President Trump can do for ‘em.”

In Moscow this is interpreted as acceptance by Washington that the war will continue on Russia’s terms – slow advance westward, no massed offensive – and that it’s now up to “direct” negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to reach an agreement. “This is a double signal prompting Putin”, another Moscow source says, “to agree to a summit meeting with Trump now without preconditions and without pressure to agree on the Kellogg or Witkoff term sheets. In all likelihood, this will be a feel-good summit. No negotiations at all.”

The source adds a caution. “The planned meeting may be derailed at the last minute if the Ukrainians violate the Victory Day ceasefire [between May 8 and 11], and if Trump is either shown to be incapable of controlling the Kiev regime, or duplicitous in aiding the violations. If the Ukrainians do not observe it, the Russians will hit back hard, very hard, and then ask Trump if he still wants to meet. It might go to the wire.”

Image
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1oms_Yw9dM

What Vance said about the Ukrainian minerals deal is interpreted in Moscow to mean that Trump and his officials will back down and retreat from deal terms they start with, in order to accept instead the appearance of a deal Trump and Vance can announce. If Zelensky can do that to Trump, the Russian assessment is that Putin can do as much, or better.

Reports from Kiev and European capitals, where the secret provisions of the minerals deal have been disclosed, indicate a plan for nothing more than a national offshore zone free of taxes, tariffs and other charges by either the Ukrainian or the US governments. In this outcome, the Americans have abandoned Trump’s demand for the reparations clause – payback for past military and economic aid. They have also given up the US demand for first-refusal priority over British, French, German or Polish companies in the bidding for resource projects. Rare earth minerals, oil, and gas have also been abandoned as Trump targets. The only target of the proposed projects identified in the agreement text is “critical sectors of Ukraine’s economy.”

In return — although not yet publicly acknowledged — the Trump Administration has agreed to Zelensky’s request for release of a $500 million instalment of new military deliveries, with promises of more to come payable either in cash or in assignment to the US capital contribution of the new “US-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund.”

“From here on every faction has its own view”, says a Moscow source privy to current intelligence assessments. “In his conclusion Putin has decided there is nothing to be lost by meeting so long as Trump does not insist on a full ceasefire. The understanding now is that Americans — Vance – are stating the war will continue for a time. This gives the Russians an opening they want for a meeting. They have decided they will take it. It’s an unconditional meeting – a Teheran-type summit for the top dogs to sort things out”.

“Some consider it a trap but others consider that Trump is not playing the European tune and is set on different terms he’s calling peace with Russia. In the talks so far, Russians laid out their demands; Americans kept on saying let’s have ‘peace’ and then we will sort things out. Russians kept insisting there are too many issues and sticking points. Americans also understand that Russians cannot make significant military gains in the short to medium term – no big offensive across the Dnieper. But what they have gained has been costly and they are not giving it up. Nor do Ukrainians — they have tried to convince the Americans that this is a stalemate and this is where the lines should freeze. That leaves Trump in something of a stalemate. So, his people have expressed willingness to discuss ‘everything’ in Ukraine, in bilateral and in European issues. They have proposed to sort out the bigger issues and details ‘in time.’ This has forced on Russians a decision now on whether to end the conversations or extend them.”

“What they also see is the opportunity of a lifetime to deal with a president who represents a stubborn, loyal constituency of 25% to 35%, who is not charged up racially as Russophobes, and does not harbour hatred, at least not for Russians. So, the consensus now around Putin, with no illusions about the deep state, is that this is an opportunity Putin must not let pass. A breakdown in friendly communications is not desirable.”

“They are not giving away anything but they will talk and continue talking all through [Trump’s] presidency in good faith, with respect. The conclusion is there is nothing to be gained by not talking, not much to be gained by sticking to positions which cannot be significantly expanded on the battlefield right now. Moreover, even the smallest US withdrawal of support from Kiev will give Russians an edge. This is something Trump is not going to give unless Putin comes to meet him face to face.”

Undiscussed by the Russian military bloggers who know, or by the American podcasters who pretend to know but don’t, is the battlefield problem. Without discussing operational details, several Moscow sources in a position to know say the indicators are “obvious that things are not as they should be on the front and all the way back, up and down the ranks. One is the slowness of the advance of each of army groups westward. Another is the nine months it took to reverse the surprise success of the Ukrainian invasion of Kursk. Yet another is problems of command and control up and down, and coordination sideways.”

An unusual analysis confirming what the Russian sources are saying has just been published by retired Hungarian Army major, Mark Takacs. He identifies himself as pro-Ukrainian in sympathy; his analysis does not reflect this.

Basing himself on open Ukrainian and Russian sources, as well as on Hungarian army staff studies and his own field experience, Takacs has just issued this report on months-long military operations of the Russian West army group around Kupyansk, east of Kharkov (December-April 28), and the Centre army group around Toretsk. North of Donetsk. (April). Although the outcomes of the Russian operations have been tactical success and territorial gains, Takacs identifies battlefield problems slowing down the Russian advance because of Ukrainian reinforcement of men and arms, counterattacking drone and electronic suppression operations, and inflicting serious Russian losses of men, armour and electronic (jamming) stations.

Image
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt1QtEiTi0M

“Until reliable anti-drone air defence artillery will have been developed, the classic onward penetration is impossible to achieve if the defender has adequate drone capabilities,” Takacs says. The Ukrainians have these capabilities — with US and NATO intelligence-sharing and coordination with battlefield combat command and control.

Takacs also claims the Russian battlefield operations are hampered by excessive rigidity of their command and control lines. This makes for predictability of movement, which, in his analysis, has been exploited by the reconnaissance and counterfire resources of the combined Ukrainian, US and NATO drone operations.

According to independent military and Moscow sources, Takacs’s conclusions come far closer to the battlefield situation than the retired US majors, lieutenant colonels and colonels currently publishing on podcasts and substacks. A NATO veteran comments: “Yes, it’s hard to pull off a surprise attack in the transparent battlefield situation in which the Russians are fighting. This being said, how were the Russians caught by surprise in Kursk last August, and by the Ukrainian counter-attacks around Pokrovsk which Takacs has just described?”

“We can also be forgiven for asking why Ukrainian command and control, as well as the logistics which allow the movement of mechanized Ukrainian fire-brigade units, like the 33rd Assault shown in this Takacs report, continue to have the benefit of electricity? My hunch is there’s a correlation between Russian advances on the front and electric war strikes. So the question here is why the Russian electric war campaign has been restricted or suspended, allowing the Ukrainians to deploy resources to the front, blocking the Russians, when that would be impossible if the power was out in areas of production, distribution, command and control, and assembly/support.”


The selection of the UAE as the site for the Putin-Trump summit meeting has special significance in the financial calculations of both the Russian and US sides. An investment fund source in Dubai explains: “Abu Dhabi and Dubai have positioned themselves as major crypto currency hubs while most other countries, including the US, adopted a ‘wait and see’ approach for over a decade. Trump has now done a 180-degree change in policy on crypto. According to CNBC,
‘at the Office of the United States Comptroller of the Currency, Jonathan Gould, has signalled support for issuing new bank charters to crypto firms. During President Joe Biden’s
presidency, that was almost unthinkable.’

“The analysts quoted by CNBC say that ‘new banks [are] getting set up that are expressly focused on crypto and stablecoins.’ This should be seen against the backdrop of overt threats from Trump to the BRICS countries, which he repeated in January, against adopting a new currency for trade and halting the trade in US dollars. While there are no real signs of progress for the BRICS currency, the Russian Central Bank has begun implementing the financial infrastructure after the Duma passed a law in July 2024 allowing Russian companies to settle their foreign trade in cryptocurrencies, such as bitcoin and stablecoins. The Trump Administration does not see the use of crypto currencies by the Russians as a threat to the US dollar and takes a positive view of this development.”

“While one of the key demands of Putin’s negotiator Kirill Dmitriev has been to restore Russia in the SWIFT messaging system, the US may not be able to make it happen because the system is operated by a Belgian cooperative in which the US, European, Swiss and Chinese banks collectively take decisions and European Union has significant influence through the German, Swiss, French and London banks in the cooperative. Getting the Trump Administration to acquiesce in Russian use of cryptocurrencies will be a significant relief for the Russians. The fact that the summit will take place in Abu Dhabi will reinforce market confidence in crypto for trade payments as an alternative to SWIFT, under the protection of the UAE.”

Dubai — the Russians also understand, according to a Moscow financial source — is the hub where Dmitriev’s oligarch constituents can negotiate large money transfers to the Trump family who have set up investment funds with family members of Trump’s advisors, Steven Witkoff and Howard Lutnick, as well as with other large campaign contributors and Trump influencers.

Image
Left, Trump negotiator Steven Witkoff’s son Zach and Eric Trump of World Liberty Financial; for more on their business, read this. “The company’s dealings have created conflicts of interest with no precedent in modern U.S. history,” reported the New York Times. “Some of the investors who bought $WLFI coins are foreign nationals who have been barred from supporting a president via campaign contributions or donations to the inaugural fund. And many of the firm’s corporate partners have clear incentives to curry favor with the federal government as they seek to expand in the American market.”
Right, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and son Brandon Lutnick of the bitcoin investment fund, Twenty One Capital Group. For the Russian oligarch shopping list, click.

Cautions the Moscow source: “Dmitriev is there to say there is a lot of money at the end of this, and maybe along the way, too, for key US industrial bigwigs and oligarchs, but there is nothing Russia will give away on its core goals in Ukraine and in European security. Platitudes aplenty, talks on money (but not yet much) — no real surrender on any of Russia’s terms. So, a decision has been made that Putin will give Trump a break, try and win him over, give him something, and try and take as much as he can in the months to follow.”

“By the way, there is near-unanimity among Russian [decision-makers] that Trump is not certain to start a military conflict with China. It will remain a trade war which will get settled this year.”

https://johnhelmer.net/the-summit-in-th ... more-91544

******

Russia Matters: Slowdown of Russian Gains; US Signals End of Mediation of Ukraine Talks
May 3, 2025
Russia Matters, 5/2/25

In the week of April 22–29, Russia gained 14 square miles (the equivalent of just over half of Manhattan island)—a major slow-down as compared to the previous week’s 40 square miles gained, according to the April 30, 2025, issue of the Russia-Ukraine War Report Card. As for Ukrainian forces, they controlled only 3 square miles of Russia’s Kursk region as of April 28, according to ISW’s data, compared to 482 square miles they claimed to have captured last August. Moreover, chief of the Russian General Staff Valery Gerasimov claimed in his report to Vladimir Putin earlier this week that Russian forces had completed pushing the Ukrainian forces out of the Kursk region1 even though Ukrainian officials denied this claim.
Inferring lessons from the Russian-Ukrainian war, the U.S. Army is “embarking on its largest overhaul since the end of the Cold War, with plans to equip each of its combat divisions with around 1,000 drones and to shed outmoded weapons and other equipment,” according to Wall Street Journal’s April 30 report. One day after that disclosure by Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg reported that Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth wants the U.S. Army to increase its use of drones as part of a broad overhaul of the military’s largest service.
Confusion continued to reign this week with regard to whether Russia and Ukraine can be brought together to agree on a durable ceasefire,2 to say nothing of a full-fledged peace deal, as the U.S. signaled a possible end to its mediation. On April 25, Trump wrote after Putin had hosted his envoy Steve Witkoff for talks that “they are very close to a deal, and the two sides should now meet, at very high levels, to ‘finish it off.’” On April 26, however, Trump appeared to have changed his tack, writing that maybe Putin “doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along.” To hear Trump’s deputy, JD Vance, tell Fox TV on May 1, there is a “very large gap” between the positions of Ukraine and Russia regarding the end of the war. Marco Rubio—who on May 9 may become the first U.S. government minister to pay a public visit Moscow in years—concurred with Vance’s assessment, acknowledging in an interview on the same day that “they’re still far apart.” It also remained unclear in what capacity the U.S. may continue to pursue peace. On May 1, the State Department’s Tammy Bruce told reporters that the U.S. “will not be the mediators” going forward.
On April 30, the Trump administration finally secured an agreement with Ukraine, giving the U.S. preferential access to the country’s contested natural resources—such as aluminum, graphite, oil and natural gas.3 The agreement establishes the “United States-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund” that Washington and Kyiv will pay into to fund development, infrastructure and natural resource extraction projects in Ukraine, according to ISW. The text of the agreement made no mention of the security guarantees that Kyiv had long sought, though part of the fund’s income will go to reimbursing the U.S. for future military assistance to Ukraine,4 according to Bloomberg. Neither does the deal cover Ukraine’s nuclear power producer Energoatom, which will remain in Ukrainian state ownership, Bloomberg reported.5 Accessing Ukraine’s minerals won’t be easy, according to experts interviewed by the U.S. press. For one, maps showing trillions of dollars of mineral deposits scattered across Ukraine are based largely on outdated studies, and proper surveys could take several years to complete, according to experts interviewed by Wall Street Journal and New York Times. Also, somewhere between 20% and 40% of Ukraine’s deposits are critical minerals located in areas of the country currently under Russian occupation, George Ingall of Benchmark Minerals Intelligence told Wall Street Journal.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/05/rus ... ine-talks/

******

Monument to Collaborator Krasnov Demolished in Rostov
May 4, 19:02

Image

Monument to Collaborator Krasnov Demolished in Rostov

Here is some really good news.
In the Rostov Region, they finally dismantled the monument to the collaborator Krasnov, who served the Nazis during the Great Patriotic War. This disgrace had been standing in the Rostov Region since the 2000s. And only on the eve of the 80th anniversary of the Victory did they deign to remove it. We can thank the public, as well as the FSB officers, who brought this matter to an end. I remember back in the 2000s, people wrote complaints to remove this abomination. It took a long time for the wind of history to reach the monument to the traitor. But better late than never. Some people believe that if it were not for the SVO, it would still be standing.

Glorification of any Nazi accomplices is unacceptable in Russia. Especially when the country is waging a war with modern Ukrainian and European Nazism. When we start talking about the ambiguity of individual Nazis or their accomplices, we erode our own historical foundation. Especially when they tried to heroize them here. Our enemies will of course use this, reasonably pointing out - why are you scolding our accomplices of Hitler, if you yourselves have the same. This very "the same thing exists" must be burned out with a hot iron. These are questions of the historical survival of society and the state.

P.S. Earlier, the FSB closed a museum in Rostov dedicated to the collaborator Krasnov.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9820089.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Mon May 05, 2025 3:24 pm

Image
The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) is in a difficult political situation, but it continues to carry on the class struggle against the capitalists who looted the Soviet people while also navigating the complexities of the war in Ukraine. | Putin photo via AP; Other photos: C.J. Atkins / People’s World; Montage design: PW

Amidst capitalist crisis and war, Russian Communists struggle against Putin and the oligarchs
Originally published: People's World on May 2, 2025 by C.J. Atkins (more by People's World) | (Posted May 05, 2025)

Walking along the thoroughfares of the Russian capital these days, it’s easy to feel as though you’ve gone “Back to the Future.” Like Marty McFly in the classic 1985 movie, visitors to Moscow might imagine they’ve traveled back in time to the Soviet past, when socialism beat Hitler and the future of communism beckoned on the horizon.

Everywhere, crimson banners bearing the word “Победа!”—“Victory!”—flap in the wind next to giant billboards of heroic Soviet soldiers on the battlefields of World War II. Golden hammer-and-sickle emblems festoon the buildings on Red Square, and out at the old Exhibition of Economic Achievements—a grand, Disneyland-sized theme park extolling the accomplishments of the Soviet Union—the statues of workers and collective farmers are all polished up like new.

Down in Volgograd, where Hitler’s troops met their Waterloo back in ’42, the local air hub has just been rechristened “Stalingrad International Airport,” and rumors suggest the whole city may soon return to its old name.

What’s going on? Has Russia gone red again? Is it time to rock out to The Beatles and sing along to “Back in the USSR”? Well, not quite.

Image
Tatiana Desiatova, Advisor to the Deputy Head of the International Commission of the Moscow City Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, spoke to People’s World in Moscow during the Second International Antifascist Forum.

Tatiana Desiatova, a straight-talking Communist with a reputation for bluntness, says there is a much simpler and more cynical explanation for all of it:

The oligarchs have built nothing but their own wealth, so now we see them cleaning up the old monuments, putting out the old Soviet symbols, singing the old songs, and celebrating some of the USSR’s achievements in an attempt to bolster their own flagging legitimacy.

Desiatova is the Advisor to the Deputy Head of the International Commission of the Moscow City Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. It’s a long-winded title, but what’s immediately apparent when you meet Tatiana Desiatova is that you’re dealing with a person who knows Russia and knows the world.

A third-generation Communist and lifelong political activist, she spoke with People’s World in Moscow last week on the sidelines of the Second International Antifascist Forum, a meeting which brought together 164 delegates from 91 countries to analyze the resurgence of fascism around the world and share strategies on how to resist it.

With the whole country decked out for the upcoming 80th anniversary of Hitler’s defeat on May 9th, she said there’s definitely a celebratory spirit in the air, a sense of pride among Russians for the fact that their country helped save the world from the Nazis. It’s a legacy that the state is trying to co-opt and append to its own increasingly costly war in Ukraine.

But that legacy belongs to the Soviet people, not to the president and the capitalist class around him which rules present-day Russia, Desiatova said. “Putin is completely part of the oligarch clique,” she emphasized, even though he’s tried to portray himself as a defender of law and order and public wellbeing.

“The economy got better after the disastrous years of Boris Yeltsin and the looting of public wealth that happened under privatization,” she said, and the public understandably gave Putin a lot of credit for that turnaround. But the question arises: Is the day coming when that’s no longer enough?

Disaster capitalism
The scale of the catastrophe that befell Russians and the other peoples of the former Soviet Union after the overthrow of socialism is hard to exaggerate. The “shock therapy” prescribed by U.S. economists in the 1990s nearly destroyed the country.

Image
The Yeltsin years: Police attack workers during a May Day rally in Moscow, on May 1, 1993. The period of privatization and the transition to capitalism brought economic collapse for the Russian working class. | Alexander Zemlianichenko / AP

If you think inflation in the U.S. has been bad these last few years, imagine prices rising by more than 2,000% in just three years—a $1 cup of coffee skyrocketing to $2,000. That’s exactly what happened in Russia after price controls were eliminated in 1991.

Public healthcare systems collapsed at the same time, and economic stress triggered an explosion of mental illness and alcoholism. Life expectancy plummeted. For women, it sank from 74 to 71 years, while men, who had been living to 64 on average, could expect to die by the age of 57 by 1994.

Mass layoffs led to millions of unemployed. For those lucky enough to keep their jobs, though, things weren’t much better. Wages in both the public and private sectors went unpaid for months or even years at a time. The collapse of the ruble in 1998 made things worse.

But perhaps the most sinister development of those years was the corrupt privatization of the public property that had belonged to the people of the Soviet Union. The first sell-off of socialist property was launched by Yeltsin in 1992 under the pretext of a “fair and open” process. The 148 million citizens of Russia were issued “privatization checks,” or vouchers, supposedly representing their individual share of the publicly-owned national wealth.

These vouchers could be used to buy shares of state enterprises. A small parasitical class who’d managed to accumulate some wealth—whether by embezzling it from their public sector employers, by trading on the black market, or via the businesses that the last Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev had legalized in the 1980s—used their resources to scour the country, buying up as many of these vouchers as possible from citizens desperate for cash.

Within less than two years, this now fully-fledged capitalist class gobbled up nearly 70% of the Soviet economy. Whole industries were put on the auction block and sold to the highest bidder. The most valuable companies were still in state hands by the mid-’90s, however, and with his government near collapse, Yeltsin and the new rulers of capitalist Russia came up with another scheme.

Image
Gennady Zyuganov, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, speaks to the press in Moscow during the Second International Antifascist Forum, April 23, 2025. | C.J. Atkins / People’s World

As the 1996 presidential elections neared, it was obvious that Communist Party candidate Gennady Zyuganov was likely to win. The Russian people had gotten a taste of capitalism and didn’t like it, so Yeltsin had to act fast.

With the mafia in charge of Moscow’s streets and the government out of rubles, Yeltsin’s cabinet turned to a secret plot known as “Loans for Shares.” Essentially, the richest and most corrupt among the new oligarchical class were offered huge blocks of shares of public enterprises in exchange for billions of dollars in loans to the state.

From the very beginning, it was intended that the government would intentionally default on these “loans,” allowing the capitalists to keep the profitable public sector corporations they held as collateral—steel companies, mines, oil companies, shipping companies. Yeltsin and the oligarchs worked out in advance exactly who would get what and for what price. Figures like Boris Berezovsky and Roman Abramovich picked up entire industries for a steal.

In return, the oligarchs did everything possible to get Yeltsin re-elected, spending millions on his campaign. Together with the election interference orchestrated by the administration of U.S. President Bill Clinton, they pulled it off. But the sham of “Russian democracy” couldn’t paper over the corruption of the regime and the theft it had facilitated. Yeltsin, the notorious alcoholic, stumbled along in office for a few more years before eventually resigning on New Year’s Eve 1999 and handing over the reins to Putin.

The new president’s rule was characterized by an emphasis on order; the mafia was brought to heel, and the oligarchs were kept in line (but also allowed to hold onto their ill-gotten gains). High oil prices, a cancellation of Soviet debts by some major lenders, and the eventual attraction of legitimate foreign investment from countries like China helped stabilize the country’s finances.

In urban areas, there eventually emerged a semblance of economic normality, even though poverty and limited job prospects continued to plague the population of the countryside. Ethnic minorities, meanwhile, found themselves increasingly relegated to low-wage service sector jobs. Inequality continued to accelerate during Putin’s first two decades in power, but the employment situation improved, wages were paid on time, and family incomes finally started to grow.

After the disaster of that first decade under capitalism, stability was enough for many people, at least for a while.

Russia (and Ukraine) today
Putin “has lived on that record for a long time,” Desiatova argued, “but it can’t last forever.” She said that is why there has been an increase in the state’s “selective coopting of the Soviet legacy” over the last several years, especially as it relates to war and other themes that easily lend themselves to nationalistic ends.

“He knows that the memory of the Soviet Union and its accomplishments,” foster pride in many Russians and that “the help the USSR provided to other countries still buys Russia a lot of goodwill in the developing world” and among nations struggling against imperialism.

Image
Moscow is decked out in red banners and Soviet symbols in preparation for the upcoming 80th anniversary of the defeat of fascism in World War II. Though the government leans heavily on Soviet imagery these days, Russia’s Communists say it represents a selective appropriation of the USSR’s legacy by the ruling class, which has built nothing of its own. This installation on Red Square, photographed on April 22, 2025, shows the Soviet hammer-and-sickle on a giant reproduction of a medal issued to soldiers during the war, which in Russia is known as the Great Patriotic War. | C.J. Atkins / People’s World

The Russian state manipulates those positive sentiments linked to the past in order to raise its own profile at home and abroad, opportunistically cherry-picking from the Soviet record while still taking advantage of every chance to trash Lenin, Marxist ideology, and socialist economics.

For the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF), the evolution of how the Soviet past is treated has produced new challenges. In previous years, the party was the sole defender of the USSR and its achievements and was the political home for Russians who felt jaded about their new capitalist reality.

As Putin’s party gradually ate into its share of support, however, the CPRF has become a shrinking political force. It has to work harder these days to make the case for socialism, especially among those generations born after the fall of the Soviet Union who have no memory of a time before the oligarchs.

The economic reality of life under capitalism leaves many people consumed with just trying to make ends meet and little time to think about alternatives—the norm for workers in all capitalist economies. And for those who were scarred by the chaos of the 1990s, there is a reluctance to rock the boat.

The coming of the Ukraine war in 2022 complicated things even further.

The CPRF is recognized by all, both at home and abroad, as being behind the war effort when it comes to liberating the oppressed peoples of eastern Ukraine (in Donetsk and Lugansk, the Donbass areas in particular) from the rule of the far-right, fascist, and neo-Nazi elements that influence the Ukrainian government installed by the 2014 U.S.-backed coup.

The CPRF is not of one mind with Putin, however, when it comes to the nature of the war.

Having personally witnessed what was happening in the Donbass before Russian troops entered in 2022, Desiatova said, “the situation for the ethnic Russians living there was actually much worse than even the international media showed on television.” Violence and human rights abuses by fascist forces were widespread.

The CPRF had advocated action to help the people of the Donbass for years, from 2014 to 2022, but for most of that time, the Putin government didn’t seem to care much about the fascist terror underway in Ukraine. Instead, he preferred to continue communicating and bargaining with Ukrainian oligarchs, supplying only limited help to the rebel forces there.

The CPRF was therefore somewhat surprised when suddenly in late 2021 the president seemed to take greater interest in assisting the people of the Donbass and began to talk of the need to combat fascism. The U.S. intention to expand NATO was always an ever-present part of the picture, but significant provocations aimed at speeding up that process and further isolating Ukraine from Russia appeared to move Putin’s hand.

In February 2022, the Russian government launched the “Special Military Operation,” sending soldiers across the frontier in force. Desiatova said that most believe it was necessary to assist the people in the Donbass, but differences exist as to whether “there may have been other means to accomplish that” besides an outright invasion.

Now, three years and thousands of dead later, the situation remains bleak, and hopes for peace seem narrow. “So many people are dying, but only the oligarchs of Russia, Ukraine, and the U.S. win,” Desiatova lamented.

So, while some commentators in the Western left media portray the CPRF as simply mimicking the talking points of the Putin government, the party’s views on the war are far more nuanced and complex than many recognize.

Asked about the matter, Desiatova pointed to an analysis put forward by Denis Parfenov, a CPRF Member of the State Duma, titled “The People Need Peace” (English translation).

Turning to Lenin, Parfenov argued that the war in Ukraine exhibits elements of two types of war: an imperialist war and a war for national liberation. The CPRF, according to Parfenov and Desiatova, clearly recognizes that there is a proxy war between U.S.-NATO imperialism and the capitalist ruling class of Russia, but the fight in Ukraine is far more than that.

The people in the ethnically Russian Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, the party maintains, were literally struggling for their survival before 2022 against the Ukrainian army and fascist militias like the Azov Battalion. Their struggle, often led by Communists and left patriots, took the form of a “people’s revolution with a socialist tinge,” as Parfenov put it. After Russian troops entered the area, however, Putin suppressed this development and has not allowed the Communist Party to take part in elections there.

Regardless, the war is now a reality, and in order to secure the liberty and security of the people living in the Donbass, the CPRF gives support to the forces struggling there and recognizes the geopolitical complexities involved. The tasks of de-Nazifying Ukraine, blocking NATO expansion, and protecting oppressed people are “fundamental issues,” according to Parfenov.

But, he cautions, “there should be no illusions” about Putin and the capitalist class that rules Russia. “The people who have gathered to ‘de-Nazify’ Ukraine are people,” Parfenov argued,

who themselves revere fascist philosophers like Ivan Ilyin and allocate money to anti-Soviet and anti-Communist causes.

Progressives who oppose fascism should not become confused, he said, about the nature of the Russian government, which “is by no means a socialist state that brings liberation from exploiters or ideas of social justice to other nations.”

Desiatova expressed hope that more people who have questions about the CPRF and the Ukraine war will read Parfenov’s paper before making assumptions.

Communists forward
The phrase “Communists forward!” was repeated by numerous speakers on the platform during the Second International Antifascist Forum in Moscow last week.

Image
‘Let Us Beat Swords into Ploughshares,’ a sculpture by Evgeniy Vuchetich on display at the Fallen Monuments Park in Moscow, April 25, 2025. With the war in Ukraine well into its fourth year, peace remains elusive. For Russian Communists, blocking NATO expansion and securing the liberty of the people of the Donbass remain priorities. | C.J. Atkins / People’s World

When Hitler’s armies invaded the Soviet Union in 1941, the people rose up to defend their homeland. At the head of their battalions—whether in the official ranks of the Red Army or among the partisans fighting behind enemy lines—were members of the Communist Party. They were the first to volunteer, the first to charge against the Nazis.

Today, as they commemorate the 80th anniversary of the victory over fascism and grapple with the difficulties of politics under the Putin government, the members of the CPRF are again sounding the call, “Communists forward!” They’re fighting for a Russian working class increasingly feeling the strain of life under a capitalism beset by crisis, sanctions, and war.

Looming ahead of them is a struggle against what Desiatova called “the next round of privatization.” After a falling out between Putin and some of the oligarchs, a significant amount of assets were seized and re-nationalized—some $10.8 billion dollars’ worth in the last three years, at least 67 companies in 2024 alone.

The Communists have urged that this property, much of it stolen from the Soviet people so long ago, should remain in public hands. Finance Minister Anton Siluanov has signaled, however, that the government has no intention of letting that happen.

“We plan to intensify the privatization of property coming into the treasury,” he told a group of state leaders in mid-March. If the government proceeds with its stated plan, the assets will simply change hands, passing from one set of oligarchs to another set currently in favor in the Kremlin.

It all seems to prove Tatiana Desiatova right. Putin sits at the head of a clique that calls the shots on everything—from economics to politics to war. Neither the plastering of Moscow with Soviet symbols and red flags nor the renovation of socialist monuments can hide the reality that Russia is a capitalist state ruled by a class of parasitical oligarchs.

https://mronline.org/2025/05/05/amidst- ... oligarchs/

******

Two Expert.Ru Essays & Rossiya 1's 25th Anniversary Documentary on Putin

"We go our own way: Russian Foreign Policy as a Cultural Phenomenon" and "From globalization to protectionism: A paradigm shift without a declaration of war"
Karl Sanchez
May 04, 2025

Image

Broadcaster Rossiya 1 produced a documentary film dedicated to Putin’s 25th anniversary as Russia’s leader, Russia. The Kremlin. Putin. 25 Years. Sputnik compiled a list of “key statements by Putin” with the last three asking the question on many minds, not just Russians:
On a successor:

▪ Russia should foster individuals capable of earning the public’s trust;

▪ The president said he observes and assesses each person's potential when thinking about a successor;

▪ He constantly considers the question of a possible successor, but it is up to the Russian people to make a final decision on who will be the next leader of Russia.
I’ve only found one source for the video which is 1:38 in length and all in Russian. I hope we’ll soon be provided with a dubbed English translation, but I haven’t looked for one yet. I see that Martyanov has used a specific portion of the film to make an important observation, and based on past practice, I expect him to post an English overdubbed version, probably Monday. Thanks to Martyanov, I was able to obtain the primary link to the video and much more, although it’s still all in Russian.

I continue to discover key Russian journals that feature writings by Russia’s ruling and advisory classes: эксперт or Expert. The first is from 28 April by Timofey Bordachev, Professor at the Higher School of Economics and Programme Director of the Valdai Club, whose writings have been featured by the Gym before. His essay is titled:
We go our own way: Russian Foreign Policy as a Cultural Phenomenon

"Only crows fly," says an old proverb adopted in the Vladimir-Suzdal land, where, after the crushing Batu Khan invasion, the revival of the Russian state began at the end of the 13th century. It began so that 250 years later, a power arose in the east of Europe, the power of which and the right to make decisions independently could not be questioned. In the first two and a half centuries of the history of our new statehood, the experience of war and diplomacy was accumulated, which remains the basis of Russian foreign policy culture to this day. The goal has always been the same: to preserve the ability to always determine one's own future.

The methods for achieving this goal remained very diverse, but they always relied on polyvariance—the absence of invariable "stratagems," any ideological dogmas, and unpredictability for adversaries. The civilizational country, which in less than a century (1552-1637) went from the Volga to the Pacific Ocean, did not create anything similar to European or Asian strategic foreign policy doctrines, simply because it never needed them: the natural inclination to non-standard solutions does not allow for a matrix of foreign policy activity.

But these features of the national foreign policy culture did not appear immediately. Until the middle of the thirteenth century, the Russian lands did not differ much from the rest of Eastern Europe. And they could well repeat the fate of other Slavic peoples who eventually fell under German or Turkish influence. The "heroic", according to the apt definition of Lev Gumilev, period of our history was distinguished by fragmentation, competition of ambitions of cities and princes. And the complete absence of grounds for creating a single state.

There was no practical need for unification: geography allowed the city-states of Russia to cope with everything on their own, and the climate never contributed to their intensive social and economic interaction. In other words, up to the second half of the thirteenth century, we followed the same path as the rest of the small peoples of Eastern Europe.

However, a "wondrous" event, as Nikolai Gogol put it, happened: in 1237, invincible hordes of Mongol rulers invaded Russia and literally demolished most of its most powerful state centers. The largest foreign policy catastrophe became, according to the classic, precisely a miraculous event, because after it we had, firstly, an understandable reason to create a single state, and secondly, pragmatism and the ability to bend without breaking. For the next 250 years, the Russians became tributaries of the Golden Horde, but were never its slaves.

All relations between the Russian lands and the Golden Horde were a continuous struggle, in which direct clashes were interspersed with cooperation. In the process, the very "sharp Moscow sword" was forged—the Russian state as a military organization of the people inhabiting it. And there was a feature of foreign policy culture that remains with us today–-the absence of a clear line between conflict and cooperation, war and peace. For several centuries, these phenomena flowed into one another, without causing any cognitive dissonance in our glorious ancestors.

At the same time, centuries of relations with neighbors that looked invincible have formed such a feature of our foreign policy culture as the absence of a connection between the strength of the enemy and the justice of his claims. In Russia, the Western European idea that injustice is inevitable in relations between people and states has not historically taken root. Thomas Hobbes's theory says that force creates the right to a higher position. For Russia, force is only the most important factor in relations, but never what determines the laws. In the famous song about the Crimean Khan's march on Moscow in the 16th century, one of the first lines is "the Crimean Tsar is riding the dog." He is a "tsar" because he has a powerful military force. But he is a "dog" because the truth is not on his side. Similarly, after the end of the Cold War, recognizing the power of the West did not mean for Russia simultaneously recognizing the rightness of its actions.

Demography, a direct consequence of the climate, has always remained our problem, although it created the basis for the integration of peoples. Only at the end of the 18th century, Russia became equal in population to France. Although even then it occupied a space several times larger than the whole of Europe.

The Russian lands had no allies.

“Russian foreign policy culture is based on the knowledge that no one will solve our problems for us, and there cannot and should not be allies on whom Russia's survival depends.”

Although Russia itself has always been and remains a loyal ally that can be relied on even in the most difficult situations.

In the middle of the XV century, the Moscow Grand Duke Vasily Vasilyevich decided to settle his allies on the eastern borders of Russia—the Kazan princes Kassim and Yakub. The history of the multinational Russian state begins, in which the main thing is not religious affiliation, but devotion to the country in solving defense problems.

In this, by the way, Russia differs from Europe from the very beginning. The evolution of Russian society became mosaic, because each ethnoconfessional group (or system of such) included in it acquired its own pace and speed of development. In Europe, this could not be the case, since the pragmatism of secular rulers was always limited by the power of the church. The Spanish kings completed their reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula by killing, expelling, or forcing the Arabs and Jews who inhabited it to be baptized. In Russia, each ethnic group was included as it was, and then it was only a matter of serving the common national interests of defense. Christianization was welcomed, but it was never a condition for public service.

Russia's modern foreign policy culture and strategy are based on historical tradition in several of its dimensions at once. Firstly, this is the already mentioned basis of the raison d'être of statehood–-defense against external challenges, which is now being transformed into a general development strategy in a changing and unpredictable world.

Secondly, both then and now, all efforts are subordinated to the solution of one task--to preserve the freedom to choose the path under any circumstances. In general, the independence of determining the trajectory of its development is the strategy of the country, for which it is most unnatural to create hard-core doctrinal guidelines. Also because ideology is needed to create doctrines and strategies. And this has not historically been characteristic of Russia.

Thirdly, Russia never has "eternal" opponents. The history of the first centuries of Muscovite statehood has convinced us that today's irreconcilable enemy may become part of the Russian state the day after tomorrow. No country in the world, except Russia, has known the experience of completely absorbing its most dangerous enemy. For more than 250 years, the Golden Horde was a formidable neighbor. However, in 1504, the Horde fell, and 50 years later, almost all its peoples and cities became equal parts of the expanding Russian state, the aristocracy merged with the Russian one.

And, finally, deep in history are the roots of the Russian "operational code", or method of waging a struggle (diplomatic or military). In its history, Russia has won few wars by exerting all its capabilities. As a rule, victory was achieved by prolonged exhaustion of the enemy, gradually creating the basis for him to realize the hopelessness of resistance. The Golden Horde was defeated in an almost bloodless stand on the Ugra River in 1480, and the second "eternal" enemy, Poland, was not defeated in a decisive battle, but reduced to an insignificant position by the pressure of Russian power over several centuries.

“For Russia, the main thing has always been not the brightness of victory, but the achievement of the desired result. Therefore, among other things, Russia is always open to negotiations: political goals invariably prevail over military ones.”

Moreover, it cannot be said about Russia that its domestic policy affects foreign policy—they are simply intertwined. And any large-scale foreign policy action is aimed at solving the problem of internal consolidation of society in order to achieve the strategic objectives of its development at a certain stage. Just as for the Moscow princes of the early time, the fight against foreign opponents was a way to unite the Russian lands.

Now the geopolitical landscape around Russia is changing again. The West, led by the United States, remains the most powerful force, but its possibilities are not unlimited. China is increasing its influence on the world, but so far it is behaving with restraint. Europe, which has historically been the main source of threat for Russia, is leaving the historical stage because it cannot create its own image of the future. Russia, the United States and China have such an image. Therefore, relations in the "triangle" will become decisive for world politics in the coming decades. And then India may join the “troika”--it is still lagging behind in terms of development but also has its own unique image of the future.

Does this mean that the Western direction will cease to be the main direction for Russian foreign policy? After all, the foundations of the science of international relations say that the most important geographical direction is the one from which the greatest danger can be expected. Most likely, in this regard, unfortunately, nothing will change. Europe has ceased to be the center of world politics, but it still remains at its center, since it is here that the most difficult border between Russia and America lies.

But we can get real resources for development only through the development of Eurasia. Friendly relations with neighbors in the East are necessary for the peaceful development of our own territory and population. It seems that this can create the material basis for the most important thing in any Russian image of the future-–the ability to go its own way. [My Emphasis]
Russian historians of Russia have always emphasized the Mongol period as crucial for its contribution to Russia’s development. Lev Gumilev’s works I now have access to, and now Gym readers do too, although it’s all in Russian. Lavrov is very influenced by his work and has high praise. As the essay shows, Russia uses a different lens to look at the world that’s proven highly successful. That Russians weren’t taught religious-based hatreds unlike Europe and its English-speaking colonies is also a very crucial difference. The short-lived period of Great Russian Chauvinism was destroyed by Revolutions and Wars, while constant existential pressure over the last 100+ years contributed greatly to Russian cohesion as a multinational people the West thought would be easy to exploit, which proved to be its greatest error, IMO. My last observation is related to Russia and Law—that Law isn’t dependent on power, that Law is superior to Might Makes Right. That ought to help readers understand why the UN Charter is still held in high esteem by Putin, Lavrov, and other high ranking Russians despite the West ignoring it because they think their power is more consequential. When we look at something very fundamental regarding Law like contract law and its basis in honesty and honor and the fact those are the only ways to build a business relationship, we can understand why Law is superior to force—force/power can wither and die while honesty and honor can be infinite.

*****************************

The next essay, published on 29 April, is by a well-placed person of importance as shown by his introductory bio: Alexander Yakovenko, Head of the Committee on Global Problems and International Security of the Scientific and Expert Council of the Security Council of the Russian Federation:
From globalization to protectionism: A paradigm shift without a declaration of war

The all-out tariff aggression of the Donald Trump administration suggests that, as on the eve of the First World War, globalization is fraught with a return to protectionism–-as part of the inevitable correction of its unintended consequences by the key affected players and the fixation of a new balance of power by the winners.

Then, at the beginning of the last century, Germany, the United States and Russia were winning, and Great Britain had to squeeze in. Therefore, London did not particularly object to a major European war, realizing that Berlin intended to unleash it, among other things, as a means of restraining the development of Russia, whose economy was then growing at a rate comparable to the current Chinese one. According to the calculations of those years, by 2050 the population of Russia was supposed to be 600 million people, and it was supposed to become the dominant (in the understanding of the Western elites) economic power not only in Europe, but also in all of Eurasia.

The British stubbornly refused, despite the insistence of St. Petersburg (this was the main mission of the then Russian ambassador Alexander Benckendorff), to declare publicly or convey to Berlin through diplomatic channels that they would side with France and Russia in the event of German aggression. In fact, this is what happened, but the opportunity to prevent a European catastrophe was missed. Berlin, which until recently had offered London an alliance in the event of French aggression against the British Isles (a direct reference to the times of Napoleon), was shocked, but the deed was done: war was declared on Russia, and France then declared war on Germany.

Obviously, now the list of losers is much longer. It is headed by America, but also by the entire European Union and Great Britain. China and a number of other countries, including India and Russia, have benefited the most. This time, Beijing and Moscow have become the objects of deterrence. Over the past three years, Moscow has proved its self-sufficiency, mobilization potential, and at the same time has set high standards for modern warfare. Hence Trump's policy of normalizing relations with Russia, which will bring Russian-American relations to an unprecedented level of positive and equal cooperation in peacetime. India is of interest to the United States as a counterbalance to China, which is becoming the main object of containment and even isolation by Washington.

The nuclear factor ensures the relatively peaceful nature of the current transformation of the world and the reflection of the new balance of power in the world order. As the Americans themselves expect, by 2030 China will be militarily equal to America, including its nuclear missile potential. Then, naturally, the task of its forceful deterrence will disappear. However, the experience of the SVO in Ukraine has shown that it will be difficult for the United States to confront China far from its borders - if Beijing decides to force the reunification of Taiwan. In any case, the threat of nuclear war will not be able to scare Beijing, since the equation of strategic deterrence has already become trilateral—with the participation of Russia: it is stupid to destroy each other in full view of Russia. In fact, this is all about Trump's pacifism: he excludes the option of war.

Washington's economic aggression remains, albeit clearly belated. It is not only about the significant trade, economic and investment interdependence between the United States and China, as indicated by the first salvos in this trade war. China has created a network structure of relevant relations with all US allies, including European ones, and much more broadly. In the face of geopolitical turmoil, no one is ready to sacrifice their economic well-being for the sake of restoring "American greatness" in Trump's interpretation.

Washington will have to face a united front of beneficiaries of the 40-year globalization of the world economic system. Allied Europe will have a motive to prevent Trump from succeeding and thereby doom his conservative revolution to failure. But the West will remain in the usual system of geopolitical coordinates.

The task clearly turned out to be more difficult than originally assumed. A long-term comprehensive strategy will be required, taking into account, among other things, the interests of American business. It can be assumed that this will be something similar to Roosevelt's New Deal, with the only amendment that it will require a smooth entry into protectionism with a parallel solution to such problems as balancing the federal budget and the national debt. Monetary shocks affecting the future of the Fed and the dollar are not excluded. Thus, multiple issues of both the dollar and government bonds cannot be ruled out. Then the question of assets denominated in old, unsecured dollars, as well as Treasuries issued with a yield of zero or so (although they will have to be repaid), will become acute. The peculiarity of capitalism is that assets can instantly be zeroed out and even acquire a negative value.

One of the Roman historians describes an episode when a young man from an aristocratic family comes to a patrician for advice, who makes the following verdict: his financial problems are such that they can be solved only through a civil war, that is, they are insoluble in the existing legal order. It is possible that this is also true for the Trump administration. Then it will be a quasi-civil war within the United States with a decisive role for the state and a "clean slate" in foreign economic terms, since this is quite in the power of America as the main shareholder of the global monetary and financial system.

In the meantime, everything suggests that there is a slowdown in global growth and world trade in the face of the uncertainty that has already developed in the first hundred days of Trump's presidency. The IMF's annual report is indicative, according to which this year global growth will fall to 2.8% (from 3.3% this year), for the United States - to 1.8% (from 2.8%) and the EU - to 0.8% (from 0.9%). China will suffer significantly - up to 4.0% (from 5.0%). In the medium term, exports to the United States may decline in the range from 19.3 to 27.6%.

Of interest are the estimates of the report of the BlackRock megafund, which manages $10.5 trillion in assets around the world. It emphasizes the importance of energy security, which will be associated with the development of artificial intelligence (it is mentioned that China is building nuclear power plants with a total capacity of 100 gigawatts, as a result of which it will account for half of all global nuclear power generation), and the prospects for infrastructure modernization with a global investment of $68 trillion by 2040. Among other things, the importance of tokenization for both payments and investments is noted.

In general, experts expect the trade war to escalate, and its effect will accumulate over time, which will be associated with distortions affecting capital accumulation and productivity losses due to the redistribution of resources. Tariffs will act as shock therapy both for America itself and for the countries against which they are imposed. At the same time, global inflation may increase slightly but then decline due to a drop in economic activity. The accumulation of distortions caused by non-market measures may eventually have a widespread impact.

This, in principle, is the price of global transformation. Self-sufficient countries, such as the United States and Russia, and those countries that manage to create relatively closed trade, economic, and monetary settlement orders within their macro-regions will be in an advantageous position.

Emissions of power politics in international relations cannot be ruled out either. Historical experience shows that the object always has an advantage and can "wait around the corner" for the subject of the policy directed against it. This happened to Russia in Ukraine, but the same can happen to China, as, by the way, has already happened to it within the framework of globalization launched by the Americans. Only this time they can "double down" and rewrite the rules of the game imposed on them, reshaping the geopolitical coordinate system into a geo-economic one. It will be society against society, and then it will be difficult to say on whose side time is on. [My Emphasis]
IMO, Trump’s attempt to reset relations with Russia will fail, which is the end game that’s now emerging. I do hope Yakovenko is correct on the use of nukes, but I don’t think his assumption about Trump’s pacifism is correct. As with his first term, he’s surrounded by Neocons and Zionists along with Neoliberal financial advisors. Long term planning is also something Americans don’t do. IMO, it’s best to look at FDR and the New Deal as an anomaly within US history as the Empire was still rising, while now it’s steadily declining with its deplorable financial state leading the way down—Parasites like Black Rock cannot be seen as strengths within the US economy as they take, not add. As mentioned in several articles and comments recently, China’s electrical power production is surpassing the combined efforts of the other leading nations—it’s planned very well for the future. And the final plus for both Russia, China and those associated with both is the overall geoeconomic system they continue to build in a manner the Outlaw US Empire will have great difficulty in defeating. And then there’s the idea that the Empire is self-sufficient like Russia; IMO, that hypothesis is incorrect. Historically, the Empire has greatly depended on the infusion of high intellect and their ideas via immigrants, people it’s now shunning that have returned home where their contributions are very welcome. I don’t see the BRICS or SCO rewriting the rules of the game. In their oratory, their leaders embrace the UN and WTO rule systems, while they find the Bretton Woods financial system to be the unfair component. I expect a new system to be made available to the world that bypasses the unfair system, and it’s a development the Empire is powerless to stop. I see time being on the side of the Global Majority, but there are many obstacles that will need to be overcome and buried over the next 75 years.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/two-expe ... rossiya-1s

Karl is absolutely correct, Trump ain't no pacifist. He considers costs and benefits, His costs and benefits. And all his assumptions are wrong. GIGO.

******.

A seasoned enemy sat in the country's leadership for 30 years
May 5, 15:16

Image

Rogozin said that Chubais had been paying for his persecution in the media and on the Internet for a long time and that a seasoned enemy had been in the country’s leadership for 30 years.

I received my first fundamental higher education in the humanities at the International Department of the Faculty of Journalism at Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov. Therefore, I have many acquaintances and friends among journalists who write and work on TV, not to mention my classmates. When in 2014 the second wave of my persecution and discrediting began in the liberal media and online resources (the first was related to my activities as the leader of the Rodina bloc and party in 2003-2006), my confidants reported that one of the organizers of this paid campaign was Chubais himself (the second customer of the dirty laundry was even worse).

To be honest, I didn’t believe it about Chubais. It is clear that he had a direct relation and interest in the first defamation campaign, but to order and pay for outright and criminal slander against the Deputy Prime Minister of the Government and the head of the state corporation "Roscosmos"? ... What kind of absolute impunity and invulnerability did he need to feel all this time for him to feel so untouchable!?

In fact, for more than 30 years, a seasoned enemy was operating in the leadership of our country.


(c) Rogozin

The fact that Chubais, an enemy who has been in the leadership of the country since the early 90s, is not news, but the payment for the persecution of Rogozin in the media is certainly interesting information, especially in connection with the hint that someone higher than Chubais participated in this. Probably someone connected with the Family.

P.S. By the way, Chubais and his gang tried through the court (!) to achieve the unfreezing of their accounts and assets in Russia.
The court refused them, reasonably believing that if they were unfrozen, they would take the unblocked funds abroad.
Of course, everything possible should be taken away from this runaway crowd, who are under criminal prosecution, in favor of the state - money, assets, real estate and other valuable property. In order to at least minimally compensate for the enormous material damage that the defendants caused to the state.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9821268.html

Restrictions in Moscow
May 5, 13:34

Image

Restrictions in Moscow.

In the capital, from May 5 to 9, there may be interruptions in mobile Internet and communications, the RSChS (Unified State System for the Prevention and Elimination of Emergencies) reported. This is due to ensuring security during the festive events, including the Victory Parade.
Citizens were advised to use Wi-Fi and make calls via traditional voice communications if necessary. From May 9 to 10, Moscow is also expected to increase security measures in the central areas of the city, block streets and restrict traffic.

Earlier today, Beeline, MTS and Megafon subscribers experienced interruptions. Also, users from Moscow and the region complained that the Telegram messenger does not work well on their phones. Operators explained that the restrictions are due to reasons beyond their control.

Today, Telegram and navigators specifically failed in the center. On
the 30th and 3rd, part of the center was closed from evening until night due to the passage of large columns of equipment for the May 9 parade.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9821107.html

Rarities of Verkhnyaya Pyshma
May 5, 11:02

Image

Rarities of Verkhnyaya Pyshma

Footage from the rehearsal of the parade on May 9.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

(Video at link.)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9820793.html

I generally avoid 'war porn' but some interesting relics there. I am famalir with most but motorcycle mounted mortar, whodda thunk?
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Tue May 06, 2025 4:08 pm

москва: Russia's Economic Powerhouse

Mayor Sobyanin visits President Putin for a chat.
Karl Sanchez
May 05, 2025

Image

Most of Moscow

Image

The new Moscow skyline emphasizing its skyscrapers.

Image

One postcard photo

Image

And another. Online image albums are filled with thousands of pics many of them equally spectacular making it very hard to choose just a few representatives. To properly visit this imperial city would take two weeks at minimum yet much would still be missed. Sergey Sobyanin has served as Moscow Mayor since 2010 and along with his team has turned the city into a gem. Many alt-media personalities that have visited Moscow over the past year proclaim it to be superior to New York in many ways. As you’ll read in the chat that follows, Moscow remains Russia’s economic engine despite efforts by the federal government to spread its economic dynamics further throughout Russia—it’s actually done a good job of that, but Moscow continues to replace the growth that’s exported with new entities and keeps itself booming; and the reason for that is excellent planning by all three governing entities—Moscow Region, City of Moscow, and the Federal government. And now for the chat between two longstanding friends and political allies:
Vladimir Putin: Good afternoon!

Sergey Semyonovich, Moscow traditionally shows very good indicators in almost all areas, including investment. How do you rate it?

Sobyanin: Mr President, despite all the objective difficulties–-and we always have objective difficulties--even in the current difficult situation, we may sometimes lack them to demonstrate such good results.

Over the past year, the economy has grown by 5.5 percent, and in general, in six years, during the pandemic, sanctions, and so on, the economy of Moscow has grown by a quarter. This is a good dynamic.

Vladimir Putin: Good dynamics, plus 25 percent.

Sergei Sobyanin: And every year we are going to make a profit.

The dynamics of investments is also quite good: it has doubled in comparable prices over the past six years. In almost all industries.

Vladimir Putin: Moscow's share in the country's economy is also significant: over 21 percent.

Sergei Sobyanin: 21 percent is not even counting the financial sector. We are still the financial center of the country, and when GRP [Gross Regional Product] is counted, the financial sector is not counted, and we have about 600 thousand people working there, a significant sector of the economy. But even so, the share is quite large.

Which, of course, cannot fail to please–-we have already talked about this, and you were at our enterprises–-manufacturing and industrial production is growing. In recent years, we have seen a modern, new industrialization of Moscow. You remember these processes when the factories moved away from us to other regions. Today we see the opposite process, because today high-tech production requires appropriate personnel.

Therefore, the reverse process is underway. Even if we look at the turnover of high-tech industries, which generally accounts for about a third of the country's industry, the growth has also tripled. These include electronics, computer manufacturing, sophisticated technologies, and so on.

The last year was generally explosive for us, because the accumulated effect of investments, introduced a number of high-tech industries, which began to replace imported equipment supplies. You can see, 100 percent, what a jump there was last year. This, of course, is impressive.

Vladimir Putin: 221.5 percent.

Sergei Sobyanin: Yes.

Thanks to all the efforts of the Government of the Russian Federation, the tasks you set, and the situation we are in: at the time of COVID, the first jump was (this is the IT sector), and today it is almost spasmodic, in arithmetic progression. We have increased it fourfold in recent years. You can see how the growth is progressing. [Referring to charts.]

The first jump occurred when COVID started in our country, because information systems were actively in demand. But even now, the growth is even stronger, and the base there is already so decent, and the growth continues. Because there is a massive substitution of imported software.

Vladimir Putin: In 2023-222 percent, and in 2024-316.5 percent.

Sergey Sobyanin: Four times the height.

Vladimir Vladimirovich, what else can I bring you to? Not all cities move so fast. You once set a goal to make Moscow one of the top five cities in the world in terms of economy and purchasing power parity. We were in fifth place in 2020 and reached the second place in the world in 2023. And nearby cities are very serious. Of course, I think it will be difficult to keep this place, given the fact that China is developing, its cities.

Vladimir Putin: The dynamics are great.

Sergey Sobyanin: We are also not standing still. Taking into account the groundwork: investments, human resources, the return of industry, high-tech, I think we will still be able to maintain this position. At least, we hope that we will be in the top three cities.

Vladimir Putin: Good potential.

Sergei Sobyanin: Apart from the economy, Mr President, social security and social infrastructure are of course important for citizens. In accordance with the national education development project, we decided to invest in the construction and modernization of schools. The program was created. And we have set a task to reconstruct all the schools in Moscow that require it. We used to build 40-50 schools each. Now, in addition to the fact that we will build 60 educational buildings, we will also reconstruct hundreds of schools. This is a big, global, and serious task. I am sure that we will succeed. In a few years, we plan to have all schools in Moscow up-to-date.

You were in one of the colleges, centers. We continue to implement this task. Last year, college admissions were already over 100,000, including city, federal, and private colleges. Nevertheless, this figure is already serious. We started with 60, now 100, and we plan to reach 150 in the future. Students study well and enjoy it, because colleges are becoming modern and in demand. 95 percent of children after college get a job in a profession, and the salaries are not bad.

An even more ambitious health program. We are finishing the program of reconstruction of polyclinics. We had 350 clinics in a dilapidated state. Now there are very few of them left in 2024, and this year we will finish this program. All our clinics will be reconstructed or built anew. And this is a serious modernization.

The same thing happens in hospitals. Of course, the situation there is more complicated: we have to build about 1 million square meters of new hospitals and reconstruct about the same amount. We also started this program. Today the situation is quite good, there are not so many buildings left, 30 buildings. I think that we will complete this program within three or four years.

New polyclinics look no worse than private ones, with an interior design, appropriate branding, new, modern medical buildings, also at the world level.

Vladimir Putin: We've been to some of them.

Sergei Sobyanin: Yes, we were in the Morozov hospital, and after that we introduced a whole new series.

Remember, you were at our X-ray and MRI data processing center and set a task for us to extend the services that we developed in Moscow with artificial intelligence for image processing to other regions. In fact, we have completed this task, connected 70 regions, and now we process three times as many images from the regions per month as we process our own images.

Vladimir Putin: Because this is also a very convenient service for the regions.

Sergei Sobyanin: Yes, absolutely. And you don't need to create it in every region, because the more data artificial intelligence processes, the better it works. Therefore, most likely, centralization is needed here. Together with the Ministry of Health, we have signed a corresponding agreement and are starting to work. Very good story.

And as a result, the development of the economy, health care, and a healthy lifestyle. We have come close to 80 years of life expectancy last year–-79.5.

Vladimir Putin: Yes, this is the result of 2024, in my opinion.

Sergei Sobyanin: Yes, this is the result of 2024—already somewhere on the verge of 80 years, such a good European result, the world result as a whole, taking into account the fact that our climate is completely different in any case.

Vladimir Putin: Yes.

Sergei Sobyanin: And on your instructions--I can't help but report–-we are continuing the program of infrastructure support, development and reconstruction with our twin cities of Donetsk and Luhansk. More than two thousand objects were reconstructed, more than a thousand kilometers of utility networks and millions of square meters of roads were restored.

We are also continuing an active program for this year. If in previous years we were mainly engaged in engineering infrastructure, now we have already begun to move on to improving public spaces: parks, roads, streets, and so on. This is not just engineering infrastructure, infrastructure for living, for public spaces.

Vladimir Putin: It is very important that people feel that positive changes are taking place in their current life.

Sergei Sobyanin: When you are inside, it is somehow invisible, but when you go out into courtyards, parks, squares, it is, of course, very noticeable and gives a positive result.

Vladimir Putin: These are all opportunities that arise as a result of economic development. And the fact that Moscow ranked second among major megacities in terms of purchasing power parity after New York, and the difference is not very large, is, of course, the basis for solving social issues, including schools, clinics, hospitals, hospitals, and so on. This is very cool. Good.

Sergei Sobyanin: Thank you for your support, Mr President. [My Emphasis]
Reports I read from New York City are very troubling—massive vacancy rate in office buildings; subway is now a vast homeless shelter with associated crime and health issues; it’s still not advised to walk in Central Park after dark; crime and filth are both very high in all districts; and the city is on the edge of bankruptcy again. What makes NYC #1 is the vast amount of parasitical wealth within the financial district and those it employs. What’s being improved in Moscow is becoming dilapidated in NYC. In its short note on this chat, TASS reported Russia’s economy in the first quarter grew 2% most likely led by Moscow’s excellent performance. Median salary in Moscow is 1,369,700 rubles. The current ruble/dollar exchange rate is just under 82 whereas on Jan first it was roughly 102, which is when I said buy rubles. Thus, the 1,369,700 rubles is about $16,700. Here’s one of the many sites providing cost of living info.

Given the continuing high rate of investment into Moscow along with its construction program, Moscow will likely continue to boom in-line with Mayor Sobyanin’s expectations. And that will provide the means to continue Moscow’s efforts to help the new regions upgrade their infrastructure and expand their economic horizons. And of course, people will continue to be attracted to the Moscow region despite the government’s plans to promote growth in Russia’s other regions.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/russias- ... powerhouse

******

Russia’s Interests Come Before Oil Prices: Peskov

Image
Oil extraction facilities. X/ @Gjallarhornet

May 6, 2025 Hour: 9:14 am

The Kremlin works with the OPEC+ to keep international prices at an optimal level, he stated.
On Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia’s interests come before oil prices while commenting on the drop in crude prices recorded in the markets.

“Oil prices cannot be a factor that influences Russia’s stance on its national interests,” he said during his daily telephone press briefing.

Peskov acknowledged that crude prices are undoubtedly “a very important factor” for the Russian budget, but he insisted that Russia is monitoring the international “situation” and working with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to keep prices at “an optimal level.”

The Kremlin spokesman made these comments in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s statement that the drop in oil prices is “pushing” Russia toward resolving the conflict in Ukraine.


On Saturday, OPEC+ decided to increase its oil supply by 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) starting June 1, after already raising output by the same amount earlier this month. This new policy has surprised the markets, which had grown accustomed to the very cautious strategy OPEC+ had maintained since the COVID-19 pandemic, focused on regaining investor confidence by ensuring high price levels.

On Monday, the Brent crude barrel for July delivery closed with a 1.73% decrease, at US$60.23, in the London futures market, amid fears of oversupply following OPEC+’s decision to boost production.

European crude lost US$1.06 compared to Friday’s price, when it closed at US$61.29, although during the session it fell as low as US$58.50, dipping below US$59 for the first time since April.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/russias- ... es-peskov/

******

Monument to NKVD armored train unveiled in Stalingrad
May 5, 20:04

Image

In Stalingrad, a memorial complex "Armored Train of the NKVD Troops" was opened ( https://t.me/news_1tv/43902
). The NKVD troops played a major role in the defense of Stalingrad. During Perestroika and the "holy 90s" their feat was slandered and denigrated, but now the times have come when NKVD soldiers are called heroes without any ifs and buts.

(Video at link.)

P.S. And there was also a sign saying "Bread" and it took the enemies of the people straight to the GULAG!
Isn't that a plot for an exposé film?

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9821689.html

Chubais must pay in full
May 6, 15:07

Image

Former Prosecutor General of Russia Skuratov on the Chubais case.

- Does this mean that Chubais is afraid of the arrest of his wealth in Russia... And is trying somehow - secretly, in boxes, sacks, to take all his savings to where he lives? Either to Israel, or...,

- Most likely, to Israel.
Moreover, this country does not extradite its citizens for foreign justice, for prosecution under criminal law in other countries. Otherwise, what would be the point of Anatoly Borisovich leaving for Israel?

- Exactly...

- And in this case, yes, there is such a preventive measure provided for by law... And it is applied even before the consideration of the arbitration case on the merits. If there is a suspicion of withdrawal, a threat of withdrawal of assets from the Russian Federation... Which will significantly complicate the use of these assets to pay off some obligations, compensate for damages to commercial structures and government agencies.

- This is the measure that was used.

- Yes... True, it is not clear from the message whether all seven of these defendants have already been charged under the article of the Criminal Code that provides for abuse of office.
But, judging by the fact that some (the defendants. - A.G.) are already here, a preventive measure has been chosen, it means that many have already been charged.
Therefore, it is natural that in parallel with the criminal prosecution, there will be property liability through the arbitration court.

- That is why preparations are underway for this process.

- Yes. Even if Chubais cannot be convicted by a Russian court - due to the refusal to extradite him, the issue of compensation for property damage, I think, will be resolved in an appropriate manner.

- This is, in my opinion, our fifth publication on this topic. Now, it means that the court decided that the lifting of the arrest on Chubais's assets will lead to their transfer abroad, so the arrest is not being lifted. And Chubais, it means, wanted it to be lifted, as I understand it?

- Yes, apparently they appealed the decision of the arbitration court, although this is not stated directly. But, apparently, they appealed the seizure. And this time the circle of participants whose property was previously seized has been expanded. Therefore, preparations for these court proceedings are in full swing.

- And what specific measures are we talking about?

- Now the bailiffs must carefully describe this property ... And - try to ensure that nothing significant changes the legal regime and does not cross the borders of the Russian Federation, if it is real estate.

- And if it is funds, money - even more so, right?

- Well, money - even more so. Money has the ability, so to speak, to move across the border.
Therefore, it is also an object for seizure. Just like assets, companies, accounts in various banks, and so on.

- So we continue to monitor?

- To monitor, to observe how Chubais has finally started to pay off his debts to the state and to the Russian law.

- But he hasn't started yet, he's just...

- No, well, there are serious preparations for this already. This stage is not unimportant.

- So, Anatoly Borisovich is being encouraged to finally fork out.

- Yes, that's for sure. He paid in full.

https://www.kp.ru/daily/27694/5083884/ - zinc

To prevent them from running off with the stolen money to Israel, we simply need to not let these people leave the country. This greatly simplifies the issue of returning the loot.
Well, this way, it will only be possible to take back a certain percentage of the total amount of damage caused. And oh, how much has been done to the country and the people over the past 30 years.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9823145.html

Google Translator

******

Putin & Xi Might Hash Out A Grand Deal That Would Enter Into Force If The Ukraine Talks Collapse
Andrew Korybko
May 06, 2025

Image

Putin might need Xi’s help if Trump “escalates to de-escalate” in the scenario of peace talks collapsing.

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to Moscow from 7-10 May is officially meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe, with the highlight being his attendance at Friday’s parade on Red Square. The Kremlin’s announcement also mentioned that he’ll hold talks with Putin on a range of issues and sign a number of intergovernmental agreements so there might be more substance to it than just that. The context in which these talks are taking place suggests that they’ll be significant.

For starters, Zelensky implicitly threatened that Ukraine might attack Friday’s parade, which elicited no public reaction from Trump despite him sounding off on all other issues so it can thus be interpreted as tacit approval on his part. Xi is therefore taking a very real personal risk by attending but is also displaying his faith in the Russian Armed Forces that are tasked with protecting him and the other guests. These interconnected gestures will surely be appreciated by Putin and all Russian policymakers.

Moving on, the US-mediated peace process between Russia and Ukraine has hit an impasse, one that’s made all the worse by Trump speculating that Putin might just be “tapping [him] along”. China can’t realistically replace the US’ role if the latter withdraws since it lacks influence over Ukraine, but Xi will assumedly expect a detailed briefing from Putin about what’s recently gone wrong and why. That could in turn lead to the next part of their talks about what Russia plans to do if the peace process collapses.

Other than keeping up the military pace like it’s been this whole time, Russia might expand its ground campaign into Ukrainian regions that aren’t (yet?) claimed by Moscow. In parallel with that, Trump’s creeping military involvement in the conflict might lead to him “escalating to de-escalate”, whether in the aforesaid scenario or simply as punishment for the talks collapsing if he blames Putin. Putin might thus request military aid from Xi or at least a pledge not to comply with any more secondary sanctions.

China has yet to send military aid to Russia and already informally complies with some sanctions because Xi doesn’t want to provoke the US. His calculations might have changed since the start of Trump’s global trade war, however, which is aimed at offsetting China’s superpower trajectory. If Xi believes that more economic and/or military pressure from the US is inevitable, then he might accede to Putin’s speculative requests, but only if the benefits outweigh the cost of speeding up the US’ aforesaid pressure campaign.

In exchange for what he requested, Putin could concede to Xi’s reported demand for bargain-basement gas prices for the stalled Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, offer similarly preferential terms for cooperation on other resource projects (including rare earths), and ramp up strategic military-technical cooperation. In a nutshell, Putin would have to abandon the nascent Russian-US “New Détente” that’s meant to bolster his country’s geostrategic balancing act, which would risk turning it into China’s “junior partner”.

The only scenario in which he’d seriously consider this is if peace talks collapse and the US “escalates to de-escalate”, which are credible possibilities given recent events, hence why he might hash out a grand deal with Xi during this week’s talks that would only enter into force if that happens. Accordingly, if Trump wants to prevent Russia from turbocharging China’s superpower trajectory, then he needs to coerce Ukraine into making more concessions to Russia for ending the conflict on better terms for Putin.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/putin-an ... ut-a-grand

(Even if Trump were canny enough to comprehend this dynamic his ego will prevent it. Trump's ego may assure Russia regaining Odessa.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Wed May 07, 2025 3:16 pm

Lavrov's 80th Anniversary Victory Day Ceremonial Speech
At the MFA's own Wreath Laying Ceremony
Karl Sanchez
May 06, 2025

Image

I’ve yet to see Lavrov in his state uniform with his awards. One would think that on this occasion he’d be dressed in that attire, but as you see he’s wearing his usual business suit uniform. The occasion is the MFA’s own Wreath Laying Ceremony that takes place inside its building. After Russia’s anthem plays during the video’s opening minute, Lavrov delivers his speech without notes or teleprompter. It’s rather different from what we usually hear as you’ll experience if you listen to him. It would’ve been nice if the video showed more than the speech, the ceremony itself specifically.
Dear Colleagues,

Dear friends,

These days we are celebrating a great date–-the 80th anniversary of the glorious Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War. Today, we, as part of the Ministry's staff, with the participation of our veterans and young people, must take an oath to be forever faithful to the achievements, feats and heroism that ensured the life of our state, our common homeland–-the Soviet Union and the future of future generations.

In those years, many employees of the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs and foreign trade colleagues went to the front together with the soldiers of the Red Army and, together with the militia, defended our capital and Motherland. They ensured their contribution to this Great Victory. At the same time, diplomats who remained at work in the People's Commissariat, together with their fellow Chekists and intelligence officers, provided diplomatic and foreign policy support for the heroic struggle of the Soviet people to save Europe from Nazism. They did everything to receive and use information that was designed to strengthen the unity of the anti-Hitler coalition and prevent the Nazis from concluding separate deals. And there were such attempts.

Throughout the war, diplomats in their posts did everything necessary to prevent betrayal. These documents have now been declassified and are being published. We found out in advance about the preparations, primarily with the participation of the British, for Operation Unthinkable. It was indeed unthinkable, because it involved an attack on the Soviet Union with the aim of inflicting a "strategic defeat" on it (as it sounds familiar now). Today, that experience is invaluable to us. The experience of building a coalition, but exclusively based on our own interests, without naivety, without excessive trust in empty promises. President Vladimir Putin spoke about this in detail in one of his interviews recently.

Now they have also rallied against us under the banner of Nazism (and in the literal sense of the word), supporting the openly racist and anti-Russian regime of Vladimir Zelensky, which holds torchlight processions and throws fighters with chevrons of Nazi divisions on their sleeves into the meat grinder. Just as in the framework of Operation Unthinkable, we are threatened with a "strategic defeat" on the battlefield.

It is important not only to preserve the memory of the heroes of the Great Patriotic War and World War II, who ensured our future and current development (I am sure that we will develop for many decades and centuries to come), but also to remember the diplomatic experience and lessons of those events. These lessons are invaluable, especially in the current situation, when almost all of Europe is again waging war against us, placed under arms and under Nazi banners.

These days, for the first time in our country, 80 “eternal flames” are lit. There was a tradition to take a particle of the "eternal flame" in the Alexander Garden and transport it to someone's small homeland. Most recently, such an action was carried out by residents of Lugansk. And a number of other cities carry out similar actions. It is symbolic that this happens shortly after Easter, when a particle of the Holy Fire from Jerusalem is carried around the world and a bright day is celebrated–-Sunday. Victory for us is also the Sunday of our entire people, our history, traditions and pride. We are obliged to pass on these feelings to our children and grandchildren, just as our mothers, fathers, grandmothers and grandfathers passed these feelings on to us.

I would like to congratulate the Foreign Ministry staff, employees of our missions in the regions of the Russian Federation, embassies and consulates on the upcoming Great Victory Day. Special congratulations to our veterans, who, as always, are on duty. They symbolize the connection between generations that allowed us to survive and emerge strengthened from a variety of situations, including those related to wars and diplomatic battles.

Everything is still ahead. No one promised that it would be possible to solve all problems in one sitting. Life requires constant effort. I hope that our team, which has repeatedly proved its capabilities in the most difficult situations, will continue to implement with honour the foreign policy defined by President Vladimir Putin. It is aimed at unconditionally ensuring the legitimate and vital interests of the Russian Federation in the international arena, leaving the door open for honest cooperation with all those who are ready to work on such an equal and mutually beneficial basis.

Happy holiday once again! [My Emphasis]
If you listened before you read, you’ll understand the reason for the rather somber delivery—Unthinkably, the Anti-Nazi war is again thrust upon Russia. IMO, Lavrov’s message merits nationwide distribution by all Russian media, not confined to the MFA’s website. Note at the opening the Soviet Union lives on, which IMO is right and proper. Eventually its constituent members in their collective status will be far more powerful and prosperous once the rude shock of separation and attempts at further destabilization finally subside in perhaps another generation or two. Those 20-40 years represent only a short period of time for the thousand plus year-old Russian Civilizational State. Those with a deep knowledge of 20th Century History will understand the gravity of Lavrov’s words, which is also why the “connections between generations” is so important for Russia and Russians as well as for all former Soviet peoples—all must remain on their guard as long as the West conducts Imperialism.

https://karlof1.substack.com/p/lavrovs- ... ry-victory

******

The American Conservative's ...

... senior editor needs to take a few serious courses in actual history, policy and strategy--I omit here courses on operational art and operations, he will not get it--and try to write with at least a pretense of objectivity, when trying to portray Trump's sheer failure as some kind of "strategy" instead of kindergarten level hustling around SMO, trying to gain whatever could be portrayed as America's "victory" and DJT's "diplomatic triumph". I, of course, do not expect the author of this drivel to grasp the critical issue of COFM.

Andrew Day posits:

Simply put, Washington doesn’t have big enough sticks to force Russia to stop the war—the “unipolar moment” truly is over. Fortunately, Trump has managed to engineer a large carrot that could help entice Moscow to make peace. In the opening weeks of the administration, the White House not only reestablished diplomatic contacts with the Kremlin but put on the table a grand U.S.-Russia rapprochement, which Putin seems to desire. In last week’s track II talks, the Russians conveyed a strong interest in better bilateral relations. Trump should continue to promote closer ties between Washington and Moscow but signal that failure to resolve the war in Ukraine would jeopardize this broader diplomatic project. He should also make clear—not only to Putin but to Russia hawks in Washington—that Moscow would get sanctions relief if it ended the war. If Trump, through wise deployment of carrots and sticks, manages to coax Putin to the negotiating table, he should use the peace talks not only to try resolving the current conflict but to probe Moscow’s intentions. This would require differentiating between Russian demands that arise from legitimate security concerns and those that bespeak nefarious designs.

LOL. I like Andrew Day's insouciance and conviction that Moscow seeks:

1. Sanctions relief. No, make no mistake--this item is in the list of demands but Andrew Day should refer himself to this (barely a month ago):

Пресс-секретарь российского лидера Дмитрий Песков призвал внимательно слушать президента России Владимира Путина в вопросе снятия антироссийских санкций. Об этом представитель Кремля сообщил в интервью журналисту ВГТРК Павлу Зарубину. «Вы знаете, если у вас возникают подобные вопросы, у меня один совет: слушайте внимательно Путина. Что сказал Путин, выступая на съезде РСПП? Никакие санкции не снимут. Санкции - это надолго, это постоянные меры по сдерживанию России», - подчеркнул политик.

Translation: The Russian leader's press secretary Dmitry Peskov called for listening carefully to Russian President Vladimir Putin on the issue of lifting anti-Russian sanctions. The Kremlin representative said this in an interview with VGTRK journalist Pavel Zarubin. "You know, if you have such questions, I have one piece of advice: listen carefully to Putin. What did Putin say when he spoke at the RSPP congress? No sanctions will be lifted. Sanctions are for a long time, they are permanent measures to contain Russia," the politician emphasized.

Russians are not naïve and know about the United States orders of magnitude more than the US knows about Russia. If people at TAC think that Russians expect any lifting of sanctions, especially from Trump, I have a bridge to sell them.

2. Restoration of a diplomatic dialogue between Russia and the US is not some kind of a goodwill gesture or carrot--it has EVERYTHING to do with:

a) Necessity of the two nuclear superpowers to stay away from escalation;

b) Trump's understanding of a pitiful state of the US military and military-industrial base;

c) A dramatic loss of the arms race by the US.

These are the main factors, together with current administration's course on (futile) preserving Ukraine as a future place d'armes against Russia, which drove DJT into his "peace" rhetoric. In some sense, Trump is just the more entertaining and coherent version of Biden and in terms of any kind of rapprochement with Russia is driven by weakness, not sincere desire to stop the bloodshed. Russians are keenly aware of that. And when Day speaks about this:


As for demilitarization, the U.S. should be open to demands that Ukraine relinquish long-range missiles, but it should resist any calls for Kiev to give up air-defense systems, land mines, and other defensive munitions. Washington might also propose to have offensive weaponry positioned in southeastern Poland for release to Ukraine only in the event of future Russian aggression.
He should learn first that all of Ukraine's "long-range missiles" have been supplied by NATO, and he also should recall this:

«Что происходит сегодня в принципе тоже понятно. По всей линии боевого соприкосновения наши войска владеют стратегической инициативой. Есть все основания полагать... Я еще совсем недавно говорил, что мы их дожмем, но есть основания полагать, что мы их добьем», — сообщил российский лидер во время беседы с моряками подводной лодки «Архангельск».

Translation: "What is happening today is also clear in principle. Along the entire line of combat contact, our troops have the strategic initiative. There is every reason to believe... I said quite recently that we will put the squeeze on them, but there is reason to believe that we will finish them off," the Russian leader said during a conversation with the sailors of the Arkhangelsk submarine.

Unlike Trump, Putin doesn't do theatrics, doesn't make grandiose statements and doesn't sell BS packaged as "achievement" and TAC people are advised to learn what "strategic initiative" is and what it all means for the United States and the Trump's Administration. This may get them some dose of much needed reality of the US sustaining a historic humiliating defeat. Defeated do not get to dictate conditions.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/05 ... tives.html

******

From Cassad's Telegram account:

Colonelcassad
The main points from Dmitry Peskov's briefing:

- Vladimir Putin did not give any new instructions on Russia's response to Ukrainian UAV attacks ahead of the May ceasefire announced by Moscow;

- By attacking Russian regions with drones, the Kiev regime continues to demonstrate its inclination toward terrorist actions. Putin's proposal for a ceasefire on the 80th anniversary of the Victory remains in force.

- Putin will meet with Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov today. -

The Russia-Venezuela Strategic Partnership Agreement, which the leaders of the countries will sign today, is a weighty, meaningful, and important document.

- The Baltic countries and Poland continue their absurd Russophobic policies, but serious contradictions are brewing in Europe.

- The IOC's refusal to accredit some Russian media outlets for the Olympics is discrimination.

- Mobile Internet in Moscow is limited during the Victory Day anniversary due to the "dangerous neighborhood", this should be treated with understanding.

- Peskov linked the ban on Vucic and Fico's flight through some EU countries with an absurd Russophobic policy;

- There are no plans to invite former leaders of foreign countries living in Russia to the Victory Parade;

https://t.me/s/boris_rozhin

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Thu May 08, 2025 2:53 pm

Global South leaders join Victory Day events in Moscow as Europe stays away

Marking the 80th anniversary of Nazi Germany’s defeat, Global South leaders are gathering in Moscow, while EU remains absent

May 07, 2025 by Ana Vračar

Image
Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia/X

Early high-level events marking the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany are underway in Russia, where the traditional Victory Parade on Friday, May 9, will welcome a host of world leaders and other guests to commemorate the Red Army’s role in the liberation of Europe. According to Russian authorities, 29 countries have confirmed their leaders will attend the event, including Brazil, Burkina Faso, China, Cuba, Venezuela, and Vietnam.

Victory Day, falling on May 8 in most of Europe and on May 9 in Russia due to time zone differences, marks the official surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945. Although the date holds deep historical significance for Europe, its political leaders will be largely absent from this year’s events in Moscow. Slovakia is the only EU country to appear on the latest list of attendees, ignoring warnings from the bloc’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Kaja Kallas, who implied there would be ‘consequences’ for European officials participating in the event. Her threats mark the latest episode in a long-standing campaign of historical revisionism led by the EU, aimed at minimizing and obscuring the Soviet Union’s role in the liberation of Europe in World War II.

Honoring Red Army’s role in defeating Nazi Germany
In contrast to the EU, Global South leaders attending the events expressed their respect and acknowledged those who fought for liberation. At the beginning of his visit, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro stated simply: “It was the Red Army that liberated Europe.” Similarly, Chinese President Xi Jinping emphasized the importance of maintaining an accurate historical perspective on World War II and applying its lessons to the present, particularly when it comes to resisting Western domination.

“Eighty years ago, the forces of justice around the world, including China and the Soviet Union, united in courageous battles against their common foes and defeated the overbearing fascist powers,” Xi wrote in an article for the Russian Gazette. “Eighty years later today, however, unilateralism, hegemonism, bullying, and coercive practices are severely undermining our world.”

Despite efforts by Western governments to demonize the Red Army, many around the world still remember the USSR’s decisive role in the antifascist struggle, the immense sacrifices it made during the war, and the international solidarity it championed. “The peoples of the world have not forgotten who, in 1945, liberated them from Nazi enslavement and destruction,” stated Gennady Zyuganov, leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, ahead of Victory Day.

“Celebrating the 80th anniversary of the great victory over fascism, we must remember the origins of Nazism,” he added. “Imperialism, which gave birth to that plague, is not a thing of the past. It is no coincidence that today our former allies in the anti-Hitler coalition are erasing us from the list of victorious countries.”

Left movements reclaim antifascist legacy for today’s struggles
Although communist groups across Europe circulated statements honoring the Red Army’s role in World War II, some also voiced concern about the context of this year’s central commemoration in Russia – just as much as the revisionism of core EU countries

It is in the spirit of reclaiming the resistance, that left and progressive groups across the region are organizing their own events. In Belgium, for example, activists have rallied around long-standing demands to re-establish May 8 as a public holiday. In former Yugoslav countries, actions will affirm the relevance of antifascism today, particularly in connection with solidarity for Palestine and mobilizations against genocide. All these events are not limited to remembrance: they aim to resist efforts to rewrite history in service of the Global North’s current political agenda.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/05/07/ ... tays-away/

******

Putin and Xi Sign Agreements for Strategic Stability and Strengthening Relations

Image
Presidents Xi Jinping (L) and Vladimir Putin (R), May 8, 2025. X/ @msgazelle220286

May 8, 2025 Hour: 8:50 am

Moscow and Beijing must defend multilateralism in response to unilateral measures and the imposition of force, Xi stated.
On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping signed declarations related to global strategic stability and the strengthening of their bilateral relations.

The ceremony, held in the Malachite Hall of the Kremlin, also included the signing of a new agreement aimed at promoting and protecting investments. Putin emphasized during his appearance that both countries share positions that are either identical or “very close” on virtually all international issues, such as combating the rehabilitation of Nazism and militarism.

“Both countries pursue an independent and autonomous foreign policy focused on shaping a more just and democratic multipolar order,” the Russian leader stated.

“Russian-Chinese relations are at the best point in their history. They are self-sufficient and do not depend on internal political factors or the current international situation,” he added.


Putin highlighted that the trade system established by Russia and China ensures protection against the influence of third countries. He also noted that the majority of economic transactions are currently carried out in rubles and yuan.

The Russian leader assured that the gas consortium Gazprom always meets the needs of the Chinese economy, even when gas demand exceeds the volumes outlined in bilateral contracts. Putin welcomed the growing presence in Russia of Chinese car and microelectronics companies.

For his part, Xi expressed support for strengthening strategic and political cooperation between the two powers, including within international organizations such as the United Nations and BRICS, the economic cooperation group led by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.

The Chinese leader emphasized that Moscow and Beijing must defend multilateralism in response to unilateral measures and the imposition of force. On Friday, Xi will attend the military parade marking the 80th anniversary of the Red Army’s victory over Nazi Germany.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/putin-an ... relations/

Russia and China To Build a Power Plant on the Moon

Image
X/ @Centurion_Pub

May 8, 2025 Hour: 9:42 am

Bolivia, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Egypt, Ethiopia, and South Africa will also participate in this international space project.
On Thursday, the Russian State Corporation for Space Activities (Roscosmos) and the China National Space Administration (CNSA) signed a memorandum for the construction of a power plant on the Moon.

“The Russian power plant will become an important contribution to the International Scientific Station on the Moon project, which is planned to be established by 2036,” the Russian space agency stated.

This memorandum is part of the package of documents signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, following a meeting held during the Chinese leader’s visit to Moscow, where he will participate in the celebrations for the 80th anniversary of the Red Army’s victory over Nazi Germany.

At the future lunar station, scientists from Russia, China, and other countries will conduct research and test innovative space technologies. In April, Roscosmos Director Dmitry Bakanov informed that 13 countries have confirmed their interest in participating in this international space project. Among them are Bolivia, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Egypt, Ethiopia and South Africa.

“The moon experiences two-week-long nights – meaning there’s two weeks of continuous sunlight followed by two weeks of continuous darkness. The nuclear power plant will be essential for providing reliable energy during the Moon’s two-week-long nights,” explained Matt McCall in an article published in Centurion.

“The collaboration between China and Russia signifies a strategic move to establish a foothold in lunar exploration and utilization. By combining their expertise, the two nations plan to construct the ILRS at the Moon’s south pole, a region that’s rich in water-based ice and other valuable resources,” he added.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/russia-a ... -the-moon/

******

Who made the greatest sacrifice for World War II victory? Not a debatable issue but an open and shut case

Stephen Karganovic

May 8, 2025

To be more precise, it would be in a world operating on normal principles of decency.

To be more precise, it would be in a world operating on normal principles of decency. But from the perspective of the fact-challenged denizens of the collective West, we all suspect that it is not.

As the 80th anniversary of the defeat of European Axis powers approaches, a notorious non-issue is gaining prominence. It is which country deserves the most credit and had sacrificed the most to achieve victory over the Axis that is soon to be commemorated. The mere raising of this preposterous question creates an artificial and for the poorly schooled citizens of Western countries thoroughly misleading historical “dilemma,” which in reality should not exist at all.

In the mediatically most relevant sense, this non-issue was recently featured in a statement by President Trump. It bears directly on the question of which country contributed the most to the victory of Allied forces and bore the brunt of that victory in terms of the lives and treasure sacrificed on the altar of common victory.

The position in this regard of the leading country of the collective West was unmistakeably reflected in President Trump’s decision to designate 8 May “Victory day” in the United States, coinciding with the “Victory in Europe” day celebrated by most Europeans since Germany surrendered in May of 1945.

There is nothing necessarily controversial in the creation of this new holiday, except for the President’s grandiloquent rationale in support of his decision, i.e. because “we did more than any other country, by far, in producing a victorious result.”

There can be no dispute that alongside other Allied troops U.S. forces fought bravely and sacrificially to defeat the Axis, not just in Europe but in the Far East against Japan as well, where they achieved victory in August 1945. But to claim that the U.S. did more than any other country, and “by far,” to secure victory in World War II is stretching it a bit.

President Trump is a patriotic American, but he is no historian any more than he is conversant with academic economics, at least judging by his tariffs policy the boomerang effect of which could have been explained to him by anyone even modestly familiar with the principles of the dismal science. There is nothing inherently wrong or incorrect with celebrating America’s enormous contribution to Allied victory, or even hyping it, as long as that is done with a sense of proportion and with due respect for the sacrifices of others. Many nations, large and small, contributed to the victorious result in World War II which saved the world from the horrors of fascism, at least in the form in which it had presented itself over eighty years ago. But once we start making self-centred comparisons in order to stress the primacy of one country’s contribution at the expense or in denigration of that of others, it becomes incumbent upon us – before making public statements – to carefully review the facts and to conform our assessments not to the demagogic exigencies of domestic politics but to historical reality.

It would seem that, being apparently better informed and closer to the actual events, President Franklin Roosevelt had a much more realistic picture of the major participants’ relative contribution to Allied victory in World War II. In one of his Fireside Chats in March of 1942, President Roosevelt told the American public that “Russian troops have destroyed—and continue to destroy—more manpower, planes, tanks, and cannons of our common enemy than all the other United Nations combined.”

Throughout the conflict Roosevelt spoke in much the same vein. In a letter to the Soviet government dated 4 February 1943 Roosevelt offered his congratulations on the local but in terms of conflict dynamics pivotal victory over the Axis at Stalingrad, noting that, “by their example, Russian soldiers arouse in the Allies a new determination to achieve the final defeat of the enemy.”

Later that month, on 22 February, President Roosevelt stated that “the Red Army and the Russian people certainly forced [Adolf] Hitler’s armed forces to follow the path to final defeat and won the admiration of the people of the United States for a long time.” Alas, that admiration was not so long-lasting, but this was well and quite accurately said at the time.

Similar sentiments, recognising the crucial contribution of the Soviet Army to the Allied war effort, continued to be expressed by President Roosevelt at other times during the conflict. In his 1943 State of the Union address, after recounting events in other theatres, he singled out for special emphasis developments on the Russian front in terms that left no room for doubt where he thought the main action was:

“By far the largest and most important developments in the whole world-wide strategic picture of 1942 were the events of the long fronts in Russia: first, the implacable defense of Stalingrad; and, second, the offensives by the Russian armies at various points that started in the latter part of November and which still roll on with great force and effectiveness.”

It could be observed that such sentiments, historically accurate as they may be, were primarily courteous in nature and contained tributes intended to fortify links with an important ally, to encourage him to fight even harder. But there are far too many hard data points independent of these remarks which pertain to the relative contributions of the participants in the conflict for the theory that Roosevelt’s words were mere courteous accolades to be sustainable.

One is that about eighty percent of casualties inflicted on the Axis in the course of the entire war in Europe occurred on what they called the Eastern Front, i.e. in the context of Nazi Germany’s ultimately unsuccessful invasion of Russia. Directly related to that fact, apart from the material devastation suffered by the USSR, the peoples comprising the Soviet Union suffered twenty-seven million military and civilian casualties during World War II, dwarfing the losses of European nations, Great Britain, and the United States combined in the European theatre. Of equal significance, for most of the war about 75-80 percent of the Wehrmacht had to be deployed in the East, which is in itself conclusive proof of where the German High Command perceived its principal opponent to be. The 80 percent of German war dead who perished in combat against Russia were about four million of the five million German soldiers killed in World War II. These are objective data posted by the U.S. National War Museum. Even if President Roosevelt’s words quoted above were to be taken as inter-allied courtesy, facts established and dispassionately cited many decades later by a serious American scholarly institution, and essentially undisputed by academic historians, tell their own story.

The reason this text had to be written is to call attention to a scandalous trend in the collective West’s amoral discourse regarding the world war that ended eighty years ago. That discourse is disseminated with brazen disregard for amply corroborated historical facts and with contempt for moral norms that until quite recently even in politics would have been considered inviolable. It is a vicious campaign worthy of knaves to rewrite and maliciously misrepresent the history of World War II. Borrowing a key concept from the sick woke methodology, the consensus engineers of the collective West are attempting to cancel, to blot out, and to memory hole the significance of Russia’s unique and indispensable role in defeating Nazi Germany and its Axis allies, to denigrate the unparalleled magnitude of its contribution to the war effort whose fruits we still enjoy, and to indecently mock the generous sacrifices made by the Russian people.

They must not be allowed to succeed in their despicable purpose.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... shut-case/

Seems like none of these Europeans or many Americans for that matter discern the real purpose of this "sick woke methodology" of which they speak. The methodology is that of Bernays and his followers, the content, generally well meaning and sometimes mistaken, is weaponized for the purpose of promoting working class disunity.

*****

Welcome to Stalingrad Airport
May 8, 5:00 PM

Image

Welcome to Stalingrad Airport

(Videos at link.)

Also in Stalingrad, during the holidays, the signs "Volgograd" were traditionally replaced with "Stalingrad".

One day these signs will remain after the holidays.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9827111.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Fri May 09, 2025 3:20 pm

Heroes of the SVO on Red Square
May 9, 11:25

Image

The parade box of the heroes of the SVO on Red Square.

Image

Image

And another interesting thing. A large Victory Banner was raised on the Ostankino TV tower.

Image

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9828500.html

Military Parade May 9, 2025
May 9, 15:00

Image

Full recording of the military parade on Red Square in honor of the 80th anniversary of the Victory of the Soviet Union in the Great Patriotic War.

(Video at link and posted below.)


Cons.

1. The Mausoleum is blocked off with cardboard (traditionally).
2. The absence of a parade box for the DPRK troops (it is unclear why they were not there, although DPRK officers were at the parade).
3. A cut-down aviation unit (but there are objective reasons for this)

. Pros: almost everything else.

1. The security issues of the parade were perfectly resolved. Of course, one can whine about the problems with mobile Internet and navigators, but this is an objectively necessary decision in the interests of the security of the entire event.
2. During preparations for the parade, not a single drone was allowed to reach the center of Moscow. The Moscow air defense unit coped well with drone attacks.
3. A large number of foreign leaders - such is international isolation. The whining in the West and Ukraine about this is priceless.
4. Parade boxes of other countries. In the conditions of the struggle for historical memory, this is important.
5. Increased significance of UAVs at the parade. There will be more and more of them every year. Well, the ground ones should soon become an organic part of the parade.
6. Many new models of modernized equipment taking into account the experience of the SVO. The emphasis is not on projects, but on what really works.
7. The parade box of the heroes of the SVO. They protect both our history and our past, and our future.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9828998.html

Google Translator

******

Parade.



http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/05/parade.html

******

The Moscow Victory Day Military Parade, 9 May 2025

Today’s military parade in Moscow marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in Europe Day was a splendid success. The air temperature was chilly and most everyone on the tribune including President Putin wore topcoats. But it was sunny and the celebrated fly-over of air force jets provided a perfect finale to the events on Red Square. The Russian president and honored guests then walked over to the the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in the nearby Alexander Gardens to observe a moment of silence and lay wreaths.

In the afternoon there is still to be the March of the Immortal Regiment which is the public counterpart to the official military parade in which Russians from all walks of life come to hold aloft photos of their forebears who fought in the Great Patriotic War as WWII is known in Russia or who worked in the home front at military manufactures. We may assume that this will also pass without incident.

In summation, the drone attacks which Kiev had threatened to sabotage the Russian Victory Day parades did not happen. We can all be calmer now that some sharp escalation in the war is for the time being unlikely.

But the entire exercise of the celebrations in Moscow was important for much more than what did not go wrong and I address attention to that in what follows.

First, all the big states of Indochina or Southeast Asia, if you will, were present: Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar. And there is good reason for this. Today they joined in celebrations of Victory in Europe. In July (date still uncertain) they will again come together, this time in Beijing, to celebrate Victory in the Pacific, i.e. the surrender of Japan, which had invaded them all during the war. And President Putin has said that he will also be attending this event in China. Given these facts, which only now became crystal clear, I better understand Putin’s decision to name Xi as the most important guest at today’s events, though it surely cost him the attendance of the Indian prime minister, who could not under any circumstances be seen as second to Xi.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un was not present in Moscow but his soldiers were and took part in the parade. Moreover just after the parade President Putin took the time to shake the hands of the senior officers in their contingent and to express gratitude for their unforgettable contribution to the liberation of Kursk oblast.

Looking at those statesmen who were on the reviewing stand, we must call out the leader of Serbia, Vucic, and the leader of Slovakia, Fico. Both had been threatened by the EU Commission’s vice president responsible for foreign affairs, Kaja Kallas, with dire consequences if they went to Putin’s party. Serbia would lose its chances for admission to the EU, she said. And under encouragement from Brussels, the Baltic States closed their air space to the Slovak leader’s jet with intention to make it impossible for him to travel to Moscow. But travel there he did.

We can be sure that this vicious bullying by Brussels will not be forgotten when Fico’s vote is needed to pass further EU decisions extending sanctions on Russia or granting aid to Kiev. In a word, by overplaying her hand the dictator running the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen has done more than former German Chancellor Merkel achieved by her wrong-headed policy of open doors to all illegal immigrants in 2015. That Dummheit cost the EU British membership. This latest Stupidity by the EU Commission may promote the break-up of the EU itself.

It is also worth mentioning, as Russian television commentators remarked, that this trip to Moscow brought together Vucic and Fico as never before and they found fellowship in each other.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2025

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2025/05/09/ ... -may-2025/

******

Trump Missing His Chance to Make History in Moscow
May 8, 2025

Edward Lozansky on the snubbing by European leaders, along with the U.S. president, of Moscow’s May 9 celebrations of the 80th anniversary of the Allied victory over Nazi Germany.

Image
Victory Day parade of the Great Patriotic War on Moscow’s Red Square, May 9, 2015. (Kremlin.ru, Wikimedia Commons /CC BY 4.0)

Edward Lozansky, who sent this dispatch to Consortium News ahead of the 80th anniversary commemoration of the end of World War II in Moscow on Friday, unexpectedly passed away on April 30. Edward, who founded the American University in Moscow, had written several articles for CN and he will be sorely missed. We extend our condolences to his family. Here is the first of two articles that he sent us last month.

By Edward Lozansky

Europeans have sunk so low that the European Union leadership warned EU heads of government against participating in Moscow’s May 9 celebrations this Friday of the 80th anniversary of the Allied victory over Nazi Germany in World War II.

Nor is the EU inviting Russia to take part in anniversary events related to the liberation of Nazi camps or to D-Day, when the U.S.S.R. played an essential role in easing the Western allies’ Normandy landing by re-directing Wehrmacht divisions to the Eastern front.

Kaja Kallas, the EU’s top diplomat, on April 15 warned EU leaders to stay away from Moscow. “Any participation in the 9th May parades or celebrations in Moscow will not be taken lightly on the European side, considering that Russia is really waging a full-scale war in Europe,” Kallas told reporters. Kiev instead invited leaders of EU countries to come to the Ukrainian capital on Friday.

Image
Kallas, the EU’s high representative and vice president of the European Commission, center, at a NATO meeting in Brussels of foreign ministers on April 4. (NATO /Flickr/ CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

The Soviet Union destroyed 70 percent of the Wehrmacht and suffered by far the greatest number of casualties in the anti-Nazi front, the deaths of some 25 million people. Yet the EU is shunning the chance to recall this historic alliance and ease tensions with Russia, which could be an attempt at setting the groundwork to end the still raging war in Ukraine.

While it appeared at first that several EU leaders would ignore Kallas’ warning, only one is attending: Slovakia’s Prime Minister Robert Fico.

Fico reacted angrily to the “disrespectful” remarks from Brussels. “I would like to inform you that I am a legitimate premier of Slovakia, a sovereign country,“ he told reporters. “Nobody can order me where to go or not to go.“ Fico said he will travel to Moscow to honor the Red Army soldiers who liberated his country and other victims of the Nazis.

Hungary’s Viktor Orban, who has been open to good relations with Moscow, said he would not attend, essentially because Hungary was with the Nazis on the losing side in the war.

Gergely Gulyas, minister in charge of the Hungarian prime minister’s office, said: “For the Hungarian people, the end of World War II had a different significance than for other countries that participated in it.”

Leaders from the following countries will take part in the Moscow event: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Burkina Faso, China, Congo, Cuba, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Guinea-Bissau, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar, Palestine, Serbia, Slovakia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe.

Image
In a posed shot, 2nd Lt. William Robertson of the U.S. Army and Lt. Alexander Silvashko of the Red Army commemorate the Soviet and American armies’ historic meeting near Torgau, Germany, on Elbe Day, April 25, 1945. (Pfc. William E. Poulson, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain)

Moscow says it’s taking extensive measures to protect them on Friday against a drone attack from Ukraine, which has repeatedly struck the Russian capital with drones. The alarm is real after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy said he can’t guarantee the safety of the 30 heads of state and government who will attend.

“Our position is very simple for all countries traveling to Russia on May 9: We cannot be held responsible for what happens on the territory of the Russian Federation,” Zelensky told journalists last Saturday. “They are responsible for your safety. We will not provide any guarantees, because we do not know what Russia might do on those dates.”

Where Is Trump?

Image
Trump outside the White House last month. (White House / Daniel Torok)

An international group that started the “Elbe Spirit” movement publicized an appeal to President Donald Trump to go to Moscow where he could meet Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese leader XI Jinping, recreating an historic Yalta 2.0 summit to start drafting a new World Security Architecture.

In addition to the U.S.-Russia alliance during World War II, Trump should recall the role of the Russian Empire during the American Revolutionary War. Empress Catherine the Great refused British pleas to send 20,000 Russian troops to suppress the rebellion. King George III even offered the island of Minorca as a bribe to get Russia to come to Britain’s aid, but Catherine refused.

Russia’s neutrality helped the American cause by decisively hindering British efforts to defeat the rebels.

Trump is calling the conflict in Ukraine “Biden’s War,” though it was Trump who first armed Ukraine. He says he wants to end it.

It is time to fulfill his pledge. Using the symbolic date of May 9 to both celebrate the end of WWII and to work towards preventing WWIII would have inscribed his name in the history books.

Instead, Trump has apparently listened to his neo-con advisers and decided to skip the opportunity to break with shortsighted European leaders and, despite them, bring peace to their continent.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/05/08/t ... in-moscow/

******

Why is Victory Day still so important for Russians today?

Raphael Machado

May 8, 2025

Probably no country treats the commemoration of victory over Nazi Germany in World War II with the same seriousness as Russia.

Probably no country treats the commemoration of victory over Nazi Germany in World War II with the same seriousness as Russia. In fact, Russians even have a special, unique name for the event: The Great Patriotic War—a name that immediately evokes a distinctly Russian significance, yet one they also wish to see recognized by other nations.

World War II was the most devastating conflict in human history. In its hegemonic project, Nazi Germany occupied nearly all of Europe, aiming, among other things, to secure racial supremacy for those they considered part of the “Aryan race.” In 1941, using military movements within USSR territory as justification and seeking to secure Lebensraum im Osten (“living space in the East”) for future German colonization, Hitler invaded the Soviet Union.

Initially, some people welcomed the invasion with optimism—due to weariness with communism—but it quickly became clear that the Germans had not come to liberate the Slavs, but to subjugate, destroy, and expel them from their ancestral lands.

Four years later, however, the Soviets marched into a ruined Berlin. Hitler was dead. The Nazi government lay in collapse. World War II—or the Great Patriotic War—was over. Yet this is not the impression one gets from Hollywood films like Saving Private Ryan.

In Western media, culture, and history books, the event credited with Germany’s defeat is the Atlanticist troops’ landing on the beaches of Normandy on D-Day. From childhood, people are taught that, thanks to the U.S., “the world doesn’t speak German.”

The reality, however, is quite different—one only needs to look at the numbers.

Approximately 75-80% of German casualties during the war occurred on the Eastern Front. The USSR inflicted over 3 million German military casualties (killed, wounded, or captured) out of Germany’s total 4.5 million losses. These figures seem decisive in settling the debate.

No one denies that the Western landing in Normandy played a significant role. By forcing Germany to fight a two-front war and diverting some of its forces from east to west, the Western offensive contributed to the conflict’s outcome. But this Western push only began in 1944, by which time the Soviets were already driving the Germans back toward their original borders. Only ideological blindness could lead someone to claim that this landing—rather than the Soviet victories at Stalingrad, Kharkov, Kursk, and beyond—led to Hitler’s downfall.

Battles like Stalingrad (1942-1943) and Kursk (1943) were decisive turning points where the Red Army not only halted the Nazi advance but launched the counteroffensive that would end in Berlin’s fall. At Stalingrad, the Soviets encircled and annihilated the German 6th Army, marking the Wehrmacht’s first major defeat. At Kursk—the largest tank battle in history—the USSR crushed Hitler’s last hopes for a strategic victory.

But what was the price paid by the Soviets?

27 million dead, military and civilian (though mostly civilians), according to the most recent estimates.

This represents roughly 17% of the Soviet population. Some regions, like modern-day Belarus, lost over 25% of their people. Ukraine suffered losses on a similar scale.

For nearly two decades now, Russia has held the “Immortal Regiment” march every Victory Day, where citizens parade with photos of relatives who took part in the Great Patriotic War. This extremely popular public memorial rite has spread worldwide. Why does it hold such importance in the Russian consciousness? Because every Russian family has relatives—grandparents, great-grandparents, uncles—who died in the war. Not a single Russian family was untouched by that tragedy.

For Russians, World War II is the Great Patriotic War because it was the moment of greatest peril for their very existence as a people. They faced the possibility of annihilation if defeated. Yet from the ruins of their country, through blood, sweat, and tears, their triumph over Germany ensured their survival.

And how has the world repaid Russians for this sacrifice?

Before 2022, mostly with indifference, ignorance, and historical falsification. Since 2022, with hatred, racism, persecution, and cancellation.

This is the great disappointment Russians feel toward the modern world. They look around and see that their immense sacrifice is not respected as it should be—at least in the West.

Yet 80 years after their triumph over death, while the West’s attitude toward Russian heroism may bring disappointment and bitterness, Russians feel nothing but pride for themselves and the deeds of their ancestors.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... ans-today/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14417
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Russia today

Post by blindpig » Sat May 10, 2025 2:41 pm

Victory Parade as a symbol of the failure of attempts to isolate Russia
May 10, 1:15 PM

Image

Moscow parade marks failure of Western efforts to isolate Russia - The Washington Post.

In fact, the failure of the strategy of international isolation of Russia became obvious by the end of 2023, when many countries saw that the West's attempts to crush Russia militarily, politically and economically were failing. But it took someone another 1.5 years to understand the obvious. So the Victory Parade also has this benefit in terms of educating the slow-witted.

The West tried to isolate Russia in line with the usual instruments of the late Washington world order, but Russia was already betting on the emerging multipolar world and this bet justified itself, since Russia was able to find enough people willing to do business with the Kremlin to devalue the West's strategy aimed at making Russia an international pariah.

The parade on May 9, 2025 only confirmed this. Hence the attempts to prevent many leaders from attending the parade (including threats and bans on air traffic) and a massive information campaign against the parade, including threats to attack the parade. I really didn't want to let Russia record this symbolic victory. But in the end, it didn't work out either. The Kremlin understood the significance of the Parade perfectly well (not only in the historical context), so it made every effort to make the event as large-scale and significant as possible, which it managed to do, to the displeasure of its opponents.

And here you can once again evaluate the rotten position of those characters who whine before May 9, "Why do you need parades?", "Who needs them?", "What's the use of them?" - here they miraculously merge with those who threatened strikes and terrorist attacks in order to prevent the Parade, who threatened the leaders of countries going to the Parade, who closed the sky so that they would not be at the Parade. Think about whose mill these characters are pouring grist on.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9830648.html

The Failed Program of De-Stalinization of Russia
May 10, 17:02

Image

Historian Artem Drabkin on the failed program of de-Stalinization and de-Sovietization, which was almost adopted in 2012.

While studying the issue of the government's attitude to the All-Russian Social Revolution, I came across something wonderful ( https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/predl ... rtv/viewer ).

They were preparing a program for us that demanded:

Recognize that the Soviet period of history is one big crime, and the Soviet Union is a criminal state.

Recognize that genocide was carried out in the USSR, that is, the Soviet state deliberately exterminated the Soviet people.

Recognize the USSR as a totalitarian state and consider it as criminal as the regime of Nazi Germany.

Rename National Unity Day to "Day of Remembrance of the Victims of the Civil War and National Reconciliation."

Conduct an audit of memorable dates and holidays in order to exclude or rename all dates related to the history of the Soviet Union. It

must be said frankly that a lot of time will pass before we realize the role of 2012 in our history, and not only the "revolution of awesome fur coats", but also the counterrevolution in the Kremlin and the Surkovshchina, the consequences of which we are still raking up.

https://t.me/drabkin/297 - zinc

And here is a list of members of the working group that worked on this program.

Image

https://web.archive.org/web/20110526192 ... p_5/stuff/ - zinc

Actually, Medvedev, who now dresses up in a Stalinist jacket and quotes Stalin to the directors of defense plants, then also openly supported the program of systemic de-Stalinization, which would have effectively become a remake of Khrushchev's de-Stalinization for the country, with quite understandable consequences for the country. This program, by the way, has been almost completely implemented in Ukraine and the Baltics.

The program itself at the systemic level existed at least since 2010 https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/artic ... iv_stalina (and most likely earlier). The trigger was probably the scandalous “Name of Russia” competition in 2008, the results of which had to be falsified in front of everyone in order to prevent Stalin’s victory.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/9830915.html

Google Translator

******

The US Is Toughening Its Negotiating Stance Towards Russia
Andrew Korybko
May 10, 2025

Image

This might presage the peace process’ collapse and the resultant intensification of their proxy war.

Trump and Vance’s latest comments on their country’s talks with Russia show that the US’ negotiating stance has toughened. The first echoed Zelensky by calling for an unconditional 30-day ceasefire and threatened to impose sanctions if it’s violated, which followed the second revealing that Russia’s demand for Ukraine to withdraw from the entirety of the disputed regions is “asking for too much”. Altogether, they confirm the US’ growing impatience with the peace process, which began in late March.

Back then, Trump threatened to impose strictly enforced secondary sanctions against those who purchase Russia’s oil if he determined that it’s responsible for the peace talks’ potential failure. One month later, he speculated that Putin is “just tapping me along”, during which time he reaffirmed the aforesaid sanctions threat. Shortly after, the US and Ukraine signed their long-awaited minerals deal, which this analysis here correctly predicted would be followed by more American weapons packages.

Although it was planned far in advance of the abovementioned developments, Putin’s latest meeting with Xi in Moscow arguably took the form of Russia’s response seeing as how he and his Chinese counterpart spent a whopping seven hours together in talks. It was foreseen right before their meeting that “Putin & Xi Might Hash Out A Grand Deal That Would Enter Into Force If The Ukraine Talks Collapse”, which appears to have been exactly what happened and could have provoked Trump’s latest post.

The US already knows that Russia is against an unconditional 30-day ceasefire because it rightly fears, per the precedent of prior ceasefires during the Minsk Accords era, that this would be exploited to give Ukraine time to rotate its troops and rearm ahead of reinitiating hostilities. It’s also important for Russia to obtain full control over the entirety of the disputed regions as part of a peace deal in order to fully incorporate and denazify those territories that it now legally considers to be its own.

Vance’s comments make it clear that the US considers this to be “asking too much” and therefore won’t coerce Ukraine into withdrawing from them, thus suggesting that Trump’s subsequent call for an unconditional 30-day ceasefire is meant to indefinitely freeze the Line of Contact against Russia’s wishes. Threatening strictly enforced secondary sanctions for lack of compliance, presumably against those who purchase Russia’s oil, is meant to simultaneously pressure Putin and his country’s top oil clients.

In connection with that, Trump’s disclosure that he discussed joint efforts to end the Ukrainian Conflict in his latest call with Erdogan and his recent remark about how “I think it’s a natural thing to ask” China to assist with this suggests that he envisages Erdogan and Xi pressuring Putin. They’d be incentivized to do so for fear of the US enforcing Trump’s threatened secondary sanctions against their countries if they refuse or fail after trying. Modi could be roped into this too since India is another top Russian oil client.

Unless there’s a breakthrough, such as Russia steamrolling across the Line of Contact or conceding to freeze it in exchange for something significant from the US (which the public might not be privy to), this sequence of events suggests that the peace process might soon collapse. The US is preparing for that scenario by signaling why it might happen from its perspective and hinting at what it’ll do in that case (i.e. more anti-Russian sanctions and arms for Ukraine) so its proxy war with Russia might soon escalate.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-us-i ... egotiating

Gives new meaning to 'blind man's bluff'.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply