Coronavirus: thesis on the present
Mission Truth
Apr 14 · 19 min read
By Diego Sequera

"Great electric skull", engraving by the Mexican artist José Guadalupe Posadas (1900)
“It is true, for the first time in the history of all the peoples of the earth there is a common present: no event of importance in the history of one country can remain as a marginal accident in the history of any other. Each country has become the almost immediate neighbor of any other, and each man feels the shudder of events taking place at the other end of the globe. "
Hannah Arendt, thinking about the world view of the dense and overwhelming Karl Jaspers, may have written this in the 60s of the last century about the proximity between nations, people and about the possible ominous reality that a world unified mainly by technological path, where all citizens are erased by the weight of unity, but here, from this moment in the historical torrent, what he wrote seems to be clothed with an even more current character.
Sixty years later, the Covid-19 world has brought us closer to being together as a species, in spite of us and also in spite of the trade and the margins of the overwhelming late neoliberalism.
The contracted world of today brings us closer in this strange process of equalization of vulnerabilities, its contracted folds make us suffer the same in a more explicit way and in this approach, in this new (by unpublished) affirmation of community in danger, the “shudder of events ”has also forced us to the evidence of a critical moral deep sea that is expressed in the ineffectiveness, paralysis, rapine, brutality or great virtues with which the states, that other unification mechanism, respond when they feel threatened .
Which brings up a new question: threatened by whom? And what makes circumstances threaten states, governments, and societies, beyond the common danger of monochord death from a disease to which we are not immune and whose protection remains a question? Where can we catch a glimpse of threat states at a time when the movement of things level geopolitics at the same point and no longer touch their faces in one fell swoop?
The virus in the bones: inhabiting uncertainty and seeing sideways
It seems that the artificial superstition of the advanced and ultramodern world has clouded and called for a chapter that no matter how hypertechnified one part of the planet is (at the expense of the other), humanity, since there is a record, will always be subjected to secular cycles of plague and general disease. The distance between the reality by which millions of people die from treatable diseases has become ineffective. There is no refuge, the crown reminds us now, beyond our confinement and the disciplinary guidelines with which each country and each society assumes quarantine.
Al-Mutanabbi, in the 10th century, treated fever like a mistress who visited him where he slept under cover of night, and which, he says, is the only time he appeared in his dwelling. In doing so, the poet offers her sheets and pillow, "but she rejects them," he tells us, "and spends the night among my bones."
Let's contract both notions: never, in generations, have we been so explicitly linked throughout the planet as now, and never, for the same reason, has the idea of proximity and experience been more difficult to avoid: this new something that lives between our bones.
Life in Planet Lockdown ( Pepe Escobar dixit ), where confinement reduces distances and inhibits the habitual and essential differences of each society, brings more than we still have measure. This new definition of the “glocal” (the global and the local unified) has become the dark side of that aspiration for “global citizenship” that has so much driven the desire for a sort of improvement that transcends borders. The new frontier in ourselves brought us to isolation, and to the reaffirmation of that favorite objective of turbocapitalism in its liberaloid or neocon variations: what illusoryly makes us closer raises the territorial walls deepening divisions.
“A system should be valued for its fruits and not for its promises. Globalism offered "free movement" of people, but has caused the largest human quarantine in history, "they say .
On that measure, the Ebola outbreaks in West Africa and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (where the last patient left the hospital leaving the hospital ), or the cholera outbreak in Haiti, have never been so far, we just wanted them to be. The collapse of that abstraction marks another boundary line in the capabilities of the system, and in the soul of many people.
It also reminds us that the fear of the dystopian of the so-called "advanced societies" is more a defense mechanism that surrenders to the evidence, and not a threatening moment that needs to be prevented. Because dystopia was actually always here .

"They caught us doctor" by José Guadalupe Posada, El Jicote magazine, No. 1 (1891)
Unfeasible border expansions
Global paralysis has not prevented the United States from finding an instance of reaffirmation, no matter that it accelerates even more that death that it carries within and that expands without interruption. The demonstration of sadism with Iran, the exhibition of decompensated musculature with Venezuela or the dysfunctional adolescent behavior with China and the World Health Organization (WHO) also draws the contour of the limits that nations can reach in moral and systemic terms.
Intellectual circles, think tanks , that give philosophical substratum to wars through economic terrorism focus the discussion on the effectiveness that the violent Covid-19 outbreak will have in achieving, now, the long-awaited goals of regime change in the Republic Islamic, in the most uphill battle in its recent history as a result of unilateral coercive measures.
The humanitarian coverage of the population that used to be the narrative center for which it was a categorical urgency to force Iran towards "democracy" becomes mute. The more dead, the better , is the premise with which sub-figures such as Mark Dubowitz of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), or that disgusting semi-human circumference called Mike Pompeo, find unconfessed pleasure. and the consecration of his worldview.
The criminal alibi that they wield on which Iran and Venezuela can still, despite the sanctions, acquire medicines, sanitary devices or food, but that they do not do it "because they do not want", inaugurates a new ratio in the process of infantilization of the American politics.
Naturally, it does not contribute much to the public self-consolation of Pompeo or Carlos Vecchio on the crime that one commits and the other promotes, the supplementary role of pressure groups that make it unviable that such "humanitarian clauses" are even less than narrative padding: there where legal scaffolding cannot operate, yes, for example, United Against a Nuclear Iran (UANI) operating on a database where each of the companies that carry out commercial actions collect exactly where the supposed “humanitarian exemptions” should act, naming and humiliating said companies, attacking them through lobbying actions within the Treasury Department and criminalizing their possible or proven action within the spheres of the corporate world and the private sector, inhibiting these companies to risk negotiating with Iran, even under the legal protection of those who issue sanctions.
Thus, disease corporations such as Bayer, Merck, Genzyme, AirSep, Medrad, Becton, Dickinson & Company, Ely Lilly and Abott Laboratories due to pressure from UANI (all of them, in front of a perfectly traceable circle of financial and ideological power) their business with Iran ceased .
While the ineffectiveness of the supposed legal channels that allow the acquisition of "humanitarian resources" is corroborated anyway , the rest of the scaffolding of extraterritorial jurisdiction ensures that in any case there are no ways for Caracas or Tehran to use their funds to acquire what is dramatically lacking, which is not the ability to cope.
John Wayne, that super-male symbol of the golden age of gringo Westerns, says that after the hour of his death he had more than 20 kilos of fecal matter in his body. And they also say that the latest movement in the United States announcing a tune-up "anti-narcotics operation" in the Caribbean where they have been emphatic whose main objective is to "cut off the financing channels" to the government of Nicolás Maduro, resembles the conduct of a cowboy in the old west.
It is convenient to stop at the western metaphor , the "last frontier" . Perpetual expansion is a central symbol of the American national myth. Some would say that the gringo empire originates and also returns to that dividing and appropriating wire. They say that in order to understand the barbaric drive that makes them act in Falluja with the same intensity with which the caging of migrant children is normalized, it is justified as a legitimate procedure that is directly related and becomes the metaphysics of its borders inward.
And that once the landmass that was conquered by making it the territory of the United States of today is the ruling principle by which it assumes that running the border line in times of late neoliberalism. The same drive that makes that border locate anywhere, wherever they want, be it the southern Caribbean basin or the Strait of Hormuz, and, therefore, there it acts "sovereignly" on what it conceives as threats.
It all comes back to the beginning. And just as the 1989 resonance of Panama over Venezuela refers to the climax of the last imperial adventure that began in the 80s of the last century with the conservative counterrevolution, acknowledging receipt of the frank inability to reinvent which it has already displayed, its expeditionary symbol par excellence, the aircraft carrier finds in the USS Theodore Roosevelt a monstrous synthesis of everything that sustains it : a floating hospital, Covid-19 breeding ground, with a captain relieved of his command to remove from the silence the hardship for which The crew was passing, in a kind of drift through the Pacific. A floating and bulging John Wayne.
The containment of the SARS virus that proliferated in various Asian countries ten years ago, they say , was due to the world making a unified effort to prevent the epidemic from reaching global pandemic status.
It is no secret to anyone that the same cannot be said now, while demonstrations continue to occur every day that certify the death of a consensus on the order of things, since the elevation of that way of representing oneself as the crystallizations of the greatest human achievements , all those beacons of civilization, left the drill and went directly to the bachaqueo of state and frank piracy, without covering their faces. In this, Europe is also well portrayed.
That behind the adolescent and extortionate departure of the Trump administration to blame China and the WHO to reduce the noise of their apoplegic reaction to the spread of the virus, added to the testosterone rattle against Venezuela and the sado-urticaria that drives rounds of sanctions and Suffocating the Iranian economy while still being hit by the effects of the blockade and the crown, it is also the sound of when the notion of empire collides with its limits.
Already said the defense secretary, Mark Esper:
"As nations around the world shift their focus inward to deal with the coronavirus pandemic, many criminal organizations are trying to capitalize on the crisis."
Your word go ahead.
Exceptional drifts
The convention says that normality was blown up. The ordinary, routine, everyday was suspended and it is assumed that the world, in its most devastating moment of common present than could be recorded, has entered the realm of the exceptional. With or without the name, it is assumed that almost the entire planet has entered a state of exception. Global one.
There is no doubt about that. The routine life of countries that conventionally live, or simulate, a state of normality, of little altered daily life, under the illusion of predictability and little surprise, have been the first to experience the shock (without being minimally prepared for that, as before they were). Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States, pillars of the "West", together with the rest of the world, bear witness to the almost total interruption of their daily habits.

A woman in a mask passes through Wall Street on March 6. The following day, New York declared a state of emergency. Photo: Andrew Kelly / Reuters
The exception is opposed to the ordinary, to the "normal", it can be said of truism. And the figure of state of exception, as a category of constitutional law, is something that will vary within that framework according to its definition in the different magnum letters, alluding to the suspension of that normality as a result of an event of force majeure or an emergency. , in which the state is conferred extraordinary powers to face the eventuality that alters the regular course of an equis society, where only essential rights remain, while the rest remain on hiatus, until the contingency passes.
But what is the content of that suspense? Or, even, such suspension of life necessarily passes by decreeing such a state of emergency? For Giorgio Agamben , long the most notable scholar of the subject in this century, there is a "no man's land between public law and political fact, and between the legal order and life" among the existential brackets of the exception.
In fact, for Agamben, the Covid-19 pandemic and his country's emergency declaration would be a situation of this type par excellence . But beyond what I say at the moment about that, which has sparked a debate with other high -profile philosophers like Jean-Luc Nancy , for the gaze of someone who lives in the same country as me, from that point of view , could be insufficient, and not for reasons of jurisprudence. The only surprise is that now the rest of the world is too. And less prepared than us.
While "normality" could still be a valid concept for an Italian citizen who does not see beyond his social habits and routine before the declaration of emergency, Venezuela has long been a country forced to live in the exception, where the daily conquest of a minimum of normality (according to how we understood it seven years ago) is the main battlefield. Because the exceptionalization of our lives was decreed from the outside.
If we continue with Agamben, his legal archeology survey on the subject comes across that such emergency powers, in addition to being a wide drawer where the ultimate meaning is justified by the powers that enact, being an excessively flexible definition, gradually too It has been the true norm to govern, especially in those countries that are supposed showcases of all the ingredients of the "exemplary" liberal democracy in the West, with its respective economic consensus.
In the 21st century, it tells us in a state of emergency. Homo priest, II, I (2005), the paradigm of these emergency powers, "as an original structure in which the law includes the living in itself through its own suspension" is manifested in two legal instruments produced by the Bush administration (that is, Dick Cheney and company), after the attacks of September 11: the military order that decrees indefinite detention managed through military commissions (not courts) of November 13, 2001, and the Patriot Act of October 26 of the same year, through which all foreigners (and locals as well) suspected of activities that threaten national security (of the United States) entered that total limbo whose maximum expression remains Guantánamo.
The measure of October 26 was decided and approved by the Senate and the Department of Justice, that of November 13 by the army by presidential decree. The entire spectrum of the state.
But emergency action is not supported in the legal veneer, but in acts of force, as has been demonstrated in the peripheries of Globalistan while the good consciences of transatlantic citizens continued to enjoy the apparent normality that their first attack with the financial crisis of 2008, and which has received the final blow with the “perfect storm” that has not yet fully started, as a result of the even deeper fracture of supply chains, the edge reached by the debt machine and the halt in economic and commercial activity crowned by the pandemic. Already with or without Covid-19 we were moving in this direction.
But, once again, what is exceptionally supervised is a known experience for countries in open intervention warfare (Yemen, Syria) or target nations of economic terrorism and “indirect” procedures of hybrid warfare (Venezuela, Iran, Cuba).
Identity politics, that Pavlovian consensus on which feel good ideologies depend so much on those who are increasingly unable to literally take care of their own shit, and which have happily proliferated in the professional and middle university layers from the social sciences in Perpetual self-sabotage, they are usually based on diffuse claims of individual and individual sovereignties while canceling national sovereignty and segmenting their own oppression to the diversity of boxed dissents.
Amusingly, they denounce the health schemes and "the bodies" subjected by "the state" to a statistical and objectifying regimentation, but they cannot see that this, the Foucaultian categories of biopower and biopolitics, operate with devastating clarity when the overall vision is decreed "Across the seas" and reduces the sovereign guidelines to the decision of who deserves to live and who dies. Achille Mbembe's idea of “ necropolitics ”, and which finds no better description than in the current State Department humanitarian catechism. Reality may be boring, but it is reality.
In this way, the “management” of these microconflicts and their discussion, increasingly de facto privatized, omits several elements that are now agonizing due to dissonance with the direction the planet may take.
A citizen who holds an Israeli passport and lives in those cities totally dependent on dystopia, today they are disturbed and cornered given that the Israeli state imposes checkpoints that block free transit, its intelligence services monitor the digital movement of people, as claustrophobia increases. So says Gideon Levy.
But Levy also clarifies that this version of the state of exception could be a dream, for example, for the Palestinian population, whose perpetual harassment and the suppression of intervals in life (Fanon would say), is clearly several steps down in hell. that still, with extraordinary measures, they would end up realizing that.
“No foreign soldier will invade their homes at midnight, night after night, for no reason. No one will snatch them out of their beds and take them away. No one will arrest them without trial. No one will question their children and imprison them in contravention of the international agreements to which Israel is a signatory, "he recalls , adding that" even in the worst dystopia of the coronavirus in Israel, there is no scenario that features snipers competing with each other shooting at them. knees hundreds of protesters ... ".
They will live (who knows if) provisionally the exception, but unlike the degradation of life and death in Gaza ( where there are 56 respirators and 40 intensive care beds for 2 million people), they still would not comply with the third precept, in addition to biopower and the state of exception, with which one lives in the remaining patches of historical Palestine: the state of siege.

Volunteers disinfect the al-Islam mosque in Jan Yunis, Gaza. Photo: Abet Zagout / Red Cross
Biopower, a state of exception and a state of siege, the trilogy with which Mbembe theorizes, could also resonate with the Iranian patient who sees how sanitary containment mechanisms battle against the artificial collapse that facilitates the blockade, or the Venezuelan population that in In the midst of the pandemic, in addition to the economic rigors, he suffers with the perpetual threat of a punitive steroid expedition by the US Navy and the Southern Command, despite being, like John Wayne, zombies with twenty kilos of fecality in his shitty biology.
Or a Haiti where the population has not ceased living the state of exception forever, and where the war machine that maintains 11 million people in permanent tension, and where there are 30 intensive care beds that work from 130, to the 11 million inhabitants.
But it seems that the post-Covid-19 world aspires to move in that direction. We were barely ahead. In troubled times of hollow shudder, the winners sharpen their aim , vying for the desired financial model, and for the savage commercial race to control the patent and commercialization of the coronavirus treatment and vaccine, the Holy Grail of the moment.
And if this sounds tremendous, it is not that from our latitude we can find comfort that now, after what is supposed to happen to us is part of the repertoire of doom destiny for the Global South or the Third World, the States themselves United is closer to us than to its ruling class, now that sanctionism and the exception turn against itself . There, by the way, in the self-styled by his establishment as the "exceptional nation".
On the other hand, we talked about how the Hitler who surprised them so much when he arrived at the door of his house (thus dressed in pink, being politically correct and speaking deconstructed; neoliberal Hitler), had already been harassing the south of the planet for decades.
Renowned writer Margaret Attwood opposes the exclusive notion of dystopia, in favor of what she called " ustopia, " the contraction of utopia and dystopia, since in every apparently exclusively dystopian universe, as in 1984 , a niche, a slit, where we outsiders will see that someone has a perfect and pleasant life, at the cost of the fatal order over the rest.
And this perhaps then leads us to take again into consideration one of the fundamental pillars from which Agamben himself takes as a starting point the intrinsic logic of the state of exception: in Walter Benjamin:
“The tradition of the oppressed teaches us that the rule is the 'state of exception' in which we live. We have to come up with a concept of history that corresponds to it ”, he says in his eighth thesis on the philosophy of history.
The global state of exception has also become the largest dispossession wealth transfer operation in history: the necropower that now wants to define that (very) high everything goes to contain the low, now yes in all possible latitudes .
The crisis was already looming, committing to the worldview itself that supports it (and the lava of political and economic responsibilities). The appearance of SARS-CoV-2, regardless of its origin, ended up bringing the collapse to all ends of human activity. The legalization of piracy in the “advanced” states is just another small symptomatic reflection.
Behind that, “The economic freeze caused by the coronavirus has crushed more people in a shorter period of time than any other crisis in memory. The working population will need much more relief than in the last collapse to not only support themselves but the foundations themselves that make the global economy continue, ” says financial specialist Nomi Prins.
With or without Covid-19, these are also political actions, and perhaps the most obvious certification that "concrete utopia" is a matter solely for the leadership behind Wall Street. The time has come to expel cheesy words about freedom from the vocabulary. Ramón has already said it: "You cannot build a world with the same language with which it was destroyed."
Freedom is something else, and "there is no legitimate freedom except when it is directed to honor humanity and perfect its lot," reminds us of El Libertador.
Nothing should make us dodge anymore that the dead in the streets of Guayaquil , and the consolation of the government of Guayas for the suffering families are to supply cardboard urns is not a management problem either, but a declaration of principles, in the same way with the one that the cretinous senator Lindsey Graham wants to hold the People's Republic of China responsible for the new more than 6 million unemployed in the United States, while the Dow Jones is going through its best week.
This is the gringo meme of the moment:

Dow Jones Best Week “Coincides” With Job Loss for Over 16 Million Americans
We have never been so close.
Meanwhile in Venezuela (a provisional closure for this unbearable note)
Just as the worst seems to be shaping his own face, I refuse to deny that this whole moment, which also has a lot of tremendous fertility, is also one that carries in its entrails an instance of revelation with the same urgency with which the agents of death.
In the global order, it is becoming clear what might be, or already are, the forces that respond to the lethal spread of the system and the pandemic, advancing in the gestation, perhaps, of a true probable or possible model. True virtuosities also emerge from crises.
And as we continue to traverse this interregnum between one world and another, here in the country where I live, we witness a reverse exodus where sisters and brothers instrumented by supremely distant interests and (in many cases) the urgency of the closest possible needs, carry out the trip back to his home, the time of emergency also opens the question about, despite everything, what will be that country for which we have the obligation to imagine.
While the agonizing extensions of Venezuelan parapolitics die of irrelevance, and the “pact of conscience” (also the word of the Liberator) that has made the preparation that we have already had like this be traumatic as a society to bear fruit while elsewhere of the planet shock and denial leaves them relatively prostrate, and despite the serial censorship with which those same places deny the place that Venezuela has conquered in its capacity and manifest will to protect the population, with secular difficulties and precariousness that we already knew and that also take us to the limit, here we have managed to demonstrate that not everything is said. Nor lost.
That, in the contrast that we establish (along with other countries), other evidence is clear and is remembered by “the enormous amount of money it costs to be poor”, as César Vallejo would say , the niche that is supposed to be the privilege of “ustopia ”Of the others, he may take on another new direction, perhaps capable of derailing the death train on the move, with his John Wayne powerless and terminally obstructed.
Perhaps sharing and understanding this common present indicates some way out of chaos, loneliness, and death.
Or, as Arendt's sentence that opened this unhappy essay closes: "But this factual and common present is not based on a common past, and in the least guarantees a common future."
https://medium.com/@misionverdad2012/co ... 946ec77af3
Google Translator