Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Thu Oct 16, 2025 3:08 pm

GORILLA RADIO — WHAT EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE TRUMP-MILLER WHITE HOUSE THAT PRIME MINISTER CARNEY IS MISJUDGING (NOT ONLY HIM)

Image

By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

Manipulating the US president to make his domestic and foreign policy decisions as Stephen Miller of the White House (lead image-3) is doing with President Donald Trump (lead image-2) is not new.

Jimmy Carter tried to dismantle the bureaucracy and the mindset (ideology) of the “imperial presidency”, as he called the White House during the election campaign of 1976. But then Carter fell under the spell of National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski; he controlled what the president was told was the evidence for his policy choices, the risks, and the consequences. In this way, Brzezinski more than influenced the policy outcomes Carter believed he was deciding for himself.

(One of them was the secret US war with the Kremlin in Afghanistan.)

Carter required that his decision-making process start and end on paper; he read reams of it in the personal study off the Oval Office. He demanded his intelligence briefing every morning. However, connected by an internal passage of connecting doors, Brzezinski supervised what was in the papers and vetted who walked in the outer Oval Office door to have words with the President.

Trump prefers pictures, screens of them, and he gets one intelligence briefing per week, followed by interpretation over lunch in the private White House dining room from Vice President JD Vance. Miller controls the paper, especially the virtual posts, the press gaggles on aircraft in flight and airfields at takeoff and landing, and in the Oval Office. Vance coaches Trump through his misspeaking, memory failures, political gaffes.

Listen now to the way in which the method and purpose of these new men differs from anything in the history of the American presidency; and how the leaders of the European allies, the UK, and Canada exploit what they believe they know in order to get the policy decisions they want from Trump — that is, after Miller, Vance and others have decided and Trump has been persuaded.

Then once you understand, ask whether the calculations of the allies, and also of the main enemy at present, President Vladimir Putin of Russia, are misjudgements of what serves their national strategies best.

Chris Cook’s latest Gorilla Radio show was broadcast on Wednesday evening British Columbia time. Our segment starts at Minute 29.35.

Image
Source: https://gradio.substack.com/p/gorilla-r ... cook-chris beginning at Minute 29:35

For the realization in London of Miller’s current role as Trump’s “prime minister”, click on this September 29 report of the Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/6754d817-57c ... c686e100c8
Image

https://johnhelmer.net/gorilla-radio-wh ... more-92572

******

Trump Declares War
October 15, 2025

Image
US President Donald Trump in Oval Office. Photo: rawpixel.com.

By M Santos – Oct 13, 2025

After decades of financing wars, regime changes and assassinations, the US imperialist political establishment is now trying to appear as a peacemaker. It is invoking “peace” in the massive suffering caused by the very conflicts it has funded and perpetuated.

US President Donald Trump is not merely the unhinged madman that some might think, with his lies, half-truths and contradictory ranting and raving. There is method in his madness–that of an egotistic, dangerous, fascistic dictator. A man who plans to not only rule the US and its military with an iron fist, but who also seeks global dominance in a uni-polar world and is prepared to do whatever it takes.

“Together, we’re reawakening the warrior spirit, and this is a spirit that won and built this nation,” said Commander-in-Chief Trump.

Trump and Hegseth were addressing 800-plus US generals, admirals, and senior enlisted advisers assembled from around the world at the Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia on 30 September.

Amidst Trump’s egotistical rants there runs a clear agenda: the US is on an aggressive and offensive path to eliminate any economic or military competition. China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are in US imperialism’s sights as well as the ever-expanding BRICS group of countries and China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

“And we want war because we want to have no wars, but you have to be there and sometimes you have to do it,” said Trump while claiming to have settled eight wars in his pursuit of the Nobel Peace Prize.

Trump boasted about the superiority of the US’s nuclear weapons and its “undetectable” submarines claiming that they were 25 years ahead of China’s and Russia’s.

Might rules
In a repeat, but a more dangerous form of the Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) doctrine, Trump argued that making the US the most powerful nuclear force will act as a deterrent. “We’re investing tens of billions of dollars in modernising our nuclear deterrence capabilities like never before,” said Trump. For “deterrence” read “offensive.”

“We must be so strong that no nation will dare challenge us, so powerful that no enemy will dare threaten us, and so capable that no adversary can even think about beating us,” Trump declared.

What enemies? US imperialism faces no military threats, only a decline in its economic power. It has around 900 foreign bases, including those encircling China and Russia.

By bullying and imposing massive tariffs on other countries, including subservient allies such as Australia, the UK, and the European nations, Trump is attempting to shore up the US economy.

“We’ve taken in trillions of dollars, we’re rich. Rich again, and there’ll never be, when we finish this out, there’ll never be any wealth like what we have,” he said referring to investments pouring into the US to avoid tariffs.

But economic means alone are insufficient. The US is looking to military means of global domination in the face of more and more nations of the Global South asserting their independence, and the economic challenge China poses.

Pick of the litter
“Over the past eight months, new enlistments, I’m so proud of this, have surged to record highs, the highest we’ve ever had. And we used to have recruiting shortages,” Trump told the gathered brass.

That’s hardly surprising when 750,000 government workers have been sacked by Elon Musk’s DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency). The massive withdrawal of funding for services in Democrat states also contributes to rising unemployment. And at the time of writing the blocking of government funding was set to result in more job losses.

“A year ago they were talking about making the military smaller because they can’t get the people to join … it’s nice to be able to cut people because of merit that aren’t really qualified for any reason, a physical reason, a mental reason,” he said echoing Hegseth’s report. “You don’t have to take them anymore because you have the pick of the litter and they all want to be with you.”



Urban warfare
“After spending trillions of dollars defending the borders of foreign countries, with your help we’re defending the borders of our country from now on. We’re not going to let this happen,” continued Trump. “Biden let people come in from prisons, mental institutions, drug dealers, murderers. We had 11,488 murderers allowed into our country by this guy who had no clue.”

“But together with many of you in the room, we’ve brought back the fundamental principle that defending the homeland is the military’s first and most important priority. That’s what it is.”

“Last month I signed an executive order to provide training for quick reaction force that can help quell civil disturbances. This is going to be a big thing for the people in this room because it’s the enemy from within and we have to handle it before it gets out of control. It won’t get out of control once you’re involved at all,” Trump said.

“In our inner cities … it’s a big part of war now, it’s a big part of war,” Trump said.

Trump bragged that bringing the military into Washington, DC had made DC “just about our safest city.”

He added that cities “that are run by the radical left Democrats, what they’ve done to San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, they’re very unsafe places. And we’re going to straighten them out one by one. And this is going to be a major part for some of the people in this room. That’s a war too. It’s a war from within.” For Trump, the people are the enemy.

“We’re under invasion from within. No different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in many ways because they don’t wear uniforms. At least when they’re wearing a uniform, you can take them out.”

Trump mused about using “these dangerous cities” as training grounds for the US military.”

A post on Trump’s Truth Social paraphrases quotes from the movie Apocalypse Now: “I love the smell of deportations in the morning. Chicago about to find out why it’s called the Department of WAR.” The post is accompanied by an AI-generated image of Trump kneeling in front of a burning skyline, with military helicopters flying overhead.

“We were dead. This country was going to hell. We were dead in everywhere from immigration to military. We didn’t have the weapons. We were giving everything to Ukraine. We had nothing.”

“Now we are discovering American muscle, reasserting American might and beginning the next story chapter in American military legends and lore.”

The imposition of massive tariffs on companies that do not invest in the US is not madness. Trump is attempting to build self-sufficiency in readiness for war against China. Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, and Cuba are among others on his hit list for regime change.

His support for Israel’s genocide and Greater Israel incorporating parts or all of Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and possibly other Arab states serves to build US imperialism’s control over the Middle East.

Trump shared on his social media an AI-generated video that shows Gaza being transformed into “Trump Gaza,” a luxurious Gulf resort. The video includes scenes of a child holding a golden Trump balloon, a gift shop selling Trump statues, and Elon Musk dancing on the beach with dollar bills raining down from above. It is accompanied by an AI-generated song with lyrics that include “Trump Gaza shining bright. Golden future, a brand-new light.”

The trillions in planned expenditure on war preparations further militarises the already heavily indebted US economy, and is being funded in part by DOGE sackings, cuts to health, to states, and most likely even more cuts to government.

Trump is paying scant heed to the constitution and any semblance of democracy, executing presidential war powers – the war he cites is domestic. It is against immigrants, against ‘woke,’ against Democrat states, and states that voted for Democrat presidential candidate Kamala Harris.

Trump is step by step changing state structures, replacing democratic processes with himself as an authoritarian, fascist dictator – and not just over the US, but globally.

The agenda that Trump is following was scripted by the ultra-right-wing Heritage Foundation. It is called Project 2025.

His speech was met with silence from the military brass–no applause.

(Communist Party of Australia)

https://orinocotribune.com/trump-declares-war/

******

Trump Plans to Use Men With Guns as Part of IRS Campaign Against “Left-Leaning” Groups
Posted on October 16, 2025 by Yves Smith

The war against Trump’s perceived political enemies keeps escalating. The Wall Street Journal provides new detail on how the Trump Administration intends to use an IRS criminal unit, whose members bear arms, as part of his campaign against “left-leaning” organizations. This fallows a Reuters account describing how the Trump Administration intends to use the Department of Justice and DHS to pursue “left wing” groups that allegedly fomented violence.

Mind you, back in the day of McCarthy witch hunts, the targets were actual Communists or those who had colorable connections to Communists. This was a small swathe of society but did pick up many members of the intelligentsia who had participated in Communist organizations in college or had friends who could be depicted as being Communist. The fear, particularly among Hollywood studios, was intense (recall movies were not deemed to have First Amendment protection prior to a 1952 Supreme Court ruling). Trump is casting his targets net much wider. Democrats are taking “left-leaning” to mean potentially any Democrat and this reading does not seem to be nuts.

The violence allegations are also a stretch, but they will be more than sufficient to allow Trump officials to root in the records and communications of many groups and key individuals. Even if they do not succeed in deploying their big guns successfully, criminal prosecution and stripping the groups of not-for-profit status, the effort will be chilling. At a minimum, the campaign will force the targets to spend heavily on lawyers. Recall that Aaron Schwartz killed himself over Federal charges that most experts were confident he could beat back. But litigation is a crapshoot, his potential sentence was long, and the cost of his defense was estimated at $1.5 million which he did not have and he did not want to bankrupt his parents in trying to muster up the funds.

Admittedly, this is anecdata, but consider. First, in the Black Live Matters protests, there was organized looting of Macys and other stores….which had nothing to do with the protestors. The New York Times reported at length how gang members with bikes cased the area as the marches were on, and then moved in as darkness fell and the demonstrators had cleared out with trucks to make their haul.

Similarly, a contact has been a co-organizer of anti-Trump marches. In a recent one, participants that none of the event leaders recognized were trying to foment a fight, urging the protestors to throw objects at the police. The protest leaders screamed at the marchers that this was a peaceful protest and not to take the bait. The protest stayed non-violent.

As the Trump Administration telegraphed earlier, one of their big plans is to strip organizations of not-for-profit status who have been allegedly engaged in political activity. This is low-hanging fruit. 501(c)3 not for profits are for charitable activities (which includes supporting journalism). Donations to them are tax deductible to the donor. 501(c)4 is for not for profits engaged in political activity. Donations to them are not tax deductible but the organization is not taxed. Public Citizen and I imagine other groups regularly involved in DC trench warfare have both 501(c)3 and 501(c)4 units and I would assume run tight ships given their fondness for controversy. That is likely not to hold for others.

But now Team Trump is about to launch the big salvo of going after purported domestic terrorists. That not only allows them to engage in ICE-raid level stunts of sending armed IRS and DHS agents in but also to deploy the anti-money-laundering/anti-terrorist-finance apparatus at Treasury to examine money flows. The top target is the Soros Open Society Foundation. Trump has repeatedly attacked its head, Alex Soros, and called for his prosecution, since at least 2023. More recently Trump Administration officials have made clear they intend to pursue not only the Soros Foundation but also grantees, as in they are presumed guilty, irrespective of what they were actually up to.

Among other things, this looks like karma for Team Dem taking over Black Lives Matter via suborning it via successfully parachuting in non-organic leaders and providing considerable funding. This takeover occurred just after BLM started staging high-profile “die-ins” at places like Grand Central, which attracted considerable participation from people of all races. The Democrats were successful; the die-ins abruptly stopped. I am told some local BLM units were able to maintain their independence.

Even conservatives are alarmed at the prospect of open political persecution:

Sarah Longwell
@SarahLongwell25
·
Follow
Conservatives (including me!) were rightly outraged when the IRS under Obama appeared to be giving undue scrutiny to Tea Party organizations. And that was *nothing* compared to what is being laid out here by the Trump administration.

Image

Now to the press accounts. Key sections from the Journal’s report:

The Trump administration is preparing sweeping changes at the Internal Revenue Service that would allow the agency to pursue criminal inquiries of left-leaning groups more easily, according to people familiar with the matter.

A senior IRS official involved in the effort has drawn up a list of potential targets that includes major Democratic donors, some of the people said.

The undertaking aims to install allies of President Trump at the IRS criminal-investigative division, or IRS-CI, to exert firmer control over the unit and weaken the involvement of IRS lawyers in criminal investigations, officials said. The proposed changes could open the door to politically motivated probes…

Among those on the list are the billionaire Democratic donor George Soros and his affiliated groups…

The effort within the IRS coincides with a larger administration effort to probe left-leaning groups for helping to finance organizations that the president says are creating anarchy in Democratic-led cities….

Trump previously said on Truth Social that Soros and his son Alex should face federal charges under the RICO Act and added in a separate interview that the elder Soros “should be in jail” without offering specific reasons…

Trump has ordered Bessent as the acting IRS commissioner to refer certain tax-exempt organizations to the Justice Department for further investigation…

The IRS has long tried to steer clear of political controversies, though not always successfully. During the Obama administration, an inspector general’s report concluded in 2013 that the IRS had used inappropriate criteria to select conservative groups for what proved to be lengthy, invasive scrutiny when seeking tax-exempt status…

The IRS-CI is a formidable tool. It has more than 2,000 agents, investigates potential criminal violations of the tax code, and assists other agencies in combating financial crime. It is the part of the IRS where agents often carry firearms, and it is distinct from the auditors and collectors who handle civil tax enforcement.


Recall that the Administration considered a perp walk for recently-indicted James Comey, but may have held back because the case against him is weak. One wonders if the Trump team will exhibit a similar level of probity with Alex Soros, particularly given that he has the resources to mount a fierce defense. Rudy Guiliani’s perp walk for Kidder Peabody’s Richard Wigton, who was later vindicated, was an embarrassing backfire.

Keep in mind that Team Trump has cut IRS staffing, so this bulking up to pursue enemies will likely come at the expense of other services.

Many cheered Trump reversal of Biden Administration staffing increases, when nearly half of the total was for customer support staff. I know individuals personally who have had taxes not owed where IRS mis-processing resulted in dunning efforts sent out to collection. That is due directly to staff cuts. For instance, professional tax filers are no longer uable to get through on the professional phone line (where they had been able to, albeit at times with some effort) and repeated letters correct IRS errors have not been acted upon. So be careful what you wish for.

The Reuters story focused on how the Trump Administration is structuring the campaign against political foes across Federal agencies:

President Donald Trump’s threatened crackdown on the finances and activities of liberal non-profits and groups opposed to his agenda is a multi-agency effort with top White House aide Stephen Miller playing a central role, according to officials.

The Trump administration plans to deploy America’s counter-terrorism apparatus – including the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the Justice Department – as well as the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department against certain left-wing groups it accuses of funding and organizing political violence, the officials said….

Miller is deeply involved in reviewing government agencies’ investigations into the financial networks behind what the administration labels “domestic terror networks,” which include nonprofits and even educational institutions…

“Left-wing organizations have fueled violent riots, organized attacks against law enforcement officers, coordinated illegal doxing campaigns, arranged drop points for weapons and riot materials, and more,” the White House said in a statement to Reuters….

When pressed by a Reuters reporter in the Oval Office on September 25 about potential targets of a domestic terrorism probe, Trump mentioned George Soros – a Democratic donor whose charitable network supports civil rights, education, democracy and other causes – and Reid Hoffman, co-founder of the online professional networking platform LinkedIn and another Democratic mega-donor.

The president did not present evidence of wrongdoing. “If they are funding these things, they’re going to have some problems. Because they’re agitators and they’re anarchists,” Trump said….

In response to a separate request, the White House highlighted seven political protests in 2023 and 2025 that included acts of violence directed against law enforcement officials, and two incidents of vandalism at Tesla dealerships this year as well as half a dozen social media posts celebrating the damage.

It named nine liberal groups, donors or fundraising organizations that it said helped finance or plan protests where the violent incidents occurred.

While the second White House official stressed that the organizations were not necessarily potential targets, the material provides insight into the administration’s thinking.

The list includes Soros’ Open Society Foundations; ActBlue, the funding arm of the Democratic Party; Indivisible, a grassroots coalition opposed to Trump policies and the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, a Los Angeles-based group.


This is going to get ugly. But as indicated, many of the targets can and will mount muscular legal defenses. How much they can do to throw sand in the gears of Trump’s political revenge machine remains to be seen.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10 ... roups.html

******

Trump’s War Against ‘Left-leaning’ Groups Extends Further

There are a number of indicators which lets one predict that the Trump administration, during the next election, will use government forces to severely attack and disrupt all opposition to it.

Trump has send the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents into the cities to harass and arrest alleged illegal immigrants. Due cause is disregarded and the methods used by the agents are brutal.

Trump has also sent National Guard troops into cities where, he claimed, riots were taking place. There were no riots or ‘terrorist incidents’ but the presence of troops is used to create a militarized atmosphere.

A new National Security Presidential Memorandum, NSPM-7 issued by Trump has defined new classes of internal enemies:

With the mainstream media distracted by the made-for-TV drama of James Comey’s indictment, Trump has signed a little-noticed national security directive identifying “anti-Christian” and “anti-American” views as indicators of radical left violence.

In NSPM-7, “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” President Trump directs the Justice Department, the FBI, and other national security agencies and departments to fight his version of political violence in America, retooling a network of Joint Terrorism Task Forces to focus on “leftist” political violence in America. This vast counterterrorism army, made up of federal, state, and local agents would, as Trump aide Stephen Miller said, form “the central hub of that effort.”

The Trump administration isn’t only targeting organizations or groups but even individuals and “entities” whom NSPM-7 says can be identified by any of the following “indicia” (indicators) of violence:
anti-Americanism,

anti-capitalism,
anti-Christianity,
support for the overthrow of the United States Government,
extremism on migration,
extremism on race,
extremism on gender,
hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family,
hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and
hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality.

“The United States requires a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts,” the directive states (emphasis mine).


That all may sound laughable but these are unfortunately serious policies . The target list includes organizations which do not exist:

The FBI and the homeland security department are actively investigating “Antifa” individuals and organizations that the Trump administration has branded domestic terrorists. Actions so far include collecting intelligence on Antifa “affinity” groups, canvassing the FBI’s vast informant network for tips about Antifa, and scrutinizing financial records, two sources involved in the investigations tell me.

There are no ‘antifa’ organizations. ‘Antifa’ is the idea of fighting indications of fascism. From time to time local interest groups may claim to do so for this or that reason. This category ‘antifa’ was likely chosen because it can be applied to any group that opposes government policies.

Today Yves Smith reports of another enforcement agency that Trump will use to destroy opposition to him:

The war against Trump’s perceived political enemies keeps escalating. The Wall Street Journal provides new detail on how the Trump Administration intends to use an IRS criminal unit, whose members bear arms, as part of his campaign against “left-leaning” organizations. This fallows a Reuters account describing how the Trump Administration intends to use the Department of Justice and DHS to pursue “left wing” groups that allegedly fomented violence.

Now to the press accounts. Key sections from the Journal’s report:

The Trump administration is preparing sweeping changes at the Internal Revenue Service that would allow the agency to pursue criminal inquiries of left-leaning groups more easily, according to people familiar with the matter.

A senior IRS official involved in the effort has drawn up a list of potential targets that includes major Democratic donors, some of the people said.

The undertaking aims to install allies of President Trump at the IRS criminal-investigative division, or IRS-CI, to exert firmer control over the unit and weaken the involvement of IRS lawyers in criminal investigations, officials said. The proposed changes could open the door to politically motivated probes…

Among those on the list are the billionaire Democratic donor George Soros and his affiliated groups…


Many on the left will not mind any attack on George Soros as his organization is well know for financing foreign color revolutions against legitimate leftist rulers. We can however be assured that Trump wont stop with them:

The list includes Soros’ Open Society Foundations; ActBlue, the funding arm of the Democratic Party; Indivisible, a grassroots coalition opposed to Trump policies and the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, a Los Angeles-based group.

Other groups on the list include two Jewish nonprofits that oppose Israel’s war in Gaza – IfNotNow and Jewish Voice for Peace.


There is unfortunately little institutional or political opposition that can restrain Trump:

The push against domestic groups and their donors comes amid Trump’s attacks on law firms, universities and the media, and his deployment of National Guard troops to some Democratic-run cities.

Timothy Naftali, a presidential historian and former director of the Richard Nixon presidential library, said Trump and Nixon were similar in their desire to punish political enemies and silence critics, but a pliant Republican-controlled Congress and a cabinet packed with loyalists are enabling Trump to go further.

“That’s why this particular moment is more dangerous for the rule of law in the United States than the 1970s were,” Naftali said.


All these are ominous signs that Trumps war on the political opposition will escalate further. Seymour Hersh’s sources are warning of this:

What’s happening now may be a trial run for the use of those forces to interfere on the behalf of the president and the Republican Party in states where the Democratic Party has a chance to win crucial seats in next fall’s Congressional elections. I’ve been told by someone with inside knowledge that planning for such action is now under way in the White House.

The ‘coerced dominance’ that has marked Trump’s brutal approach to foreign policy will now being applied to domestic issues and legitimate opposition.

Russell Vought, Trumps’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, are the men behind this.

The scary thing is that there is, so far, little or any opposition to these plans and only few warnings about their consequences.

Posted by b on October 16, 2025 at 14:43 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/10/t ... rther.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Fri Oct 17, 2025 3:02 pm

US Supreme Court May Grant Trump Unbridled Authority
October 16, 2025

Marjorie Cohn previews some of the cases the U.S. high court will use to establish the limits of executive power.

Image
Lady Justice statue outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C.
(Michael Galkovsky, Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

By Marjorie Cohn
Truthout

The Supreme Court’s new term, which began last week, presents the court with a monumental opportunity to hand Donald Trump unbridled executive authority and eviscerate the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.

The court appears poised to rubber stamp many of Trump’s worst abuses, from the imposition of massive tariffs to seizing control of federal agencies created by Congress.

Although there are 39 cases on the court’s regular docket, it has already handled nearly 30 cases with temporary unsigned orders on its “emergency docket.” In those cases, the high court granted Trump’s requests to block orders from lower courts 20 times and ruled against his administration in only three cases; the others led to mixed rulings.

Even though the cases in which the high court has already opined are not final decisions on the merits, they provide a preview of what we can expect during this term after full briefing and oral arguments.

“It’s hard to imagine bigger tests of presidential power than these potentially once-in-a-century separation-of-powers battles,” Deepak Gupta, a lawyer who frequently appears before the court, told The New York Times. “And we’re seeing more than one of them at once.”

Here are some of the cases the court will use to establish the limits of executive power.

Image
Trump with Reciprocal Tariff Chart in April. (Daniel Torok, White House Photo)

Imposition of Massive Tariffs

In early November, the court will consider the legality of Trump’s wide-ranging tariffs on goods bought from other countries in two cases, Trump v. V.O.S. Selections and Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. The U.S. Court of Appeals held that Trump does not have the authority to unilaterally impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA).

Congress has the power to impose tariffs and taxes, and raise revenues under the Constitution. For most of U.S. history, tariffs provided the main source of financing for the federal government. In 1913, the 16th amendment was enacted to authorize “taxes on incomes.”

The IEEPA gives the president authority to deal with “any unusual or extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security, the economy, or foreign policy. The act doesn’t mention tariffs, taxes or duties but says the president can “regulate” the “importation” of “property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest.” Trump maintains that “regulate” implicitly includes the imposition of tariffs.

Trump’s lawyers argue that he didn’t impose tariffs to raise revenue but rather to “rectify America’s country-killing trade deficits and to stem the flood of fentanyl and other lethal drugs across our borders.”

In holding that Trump lacked the power to impose the tariffs, the Court of Appeals used the “major questions” doctrine, which requires that Congress provide clear guidance before a federal agency can proceed on a major question of political or economic significance.

The Supreme Court used the major questions doctrine to strike down vaccine, environmental, and student loan relief policies of the Biden administration.

These cases raise the issues of whether Congress delegated its tariff power to the president in the IEEPA and whether the president can increase taxes on the American people without a new act of Congress.

Firing Members of Agencies Created by Congress

The Supreme Court will also take up the issue of Trump’s authority to fire members of independent agencies in December. Trump v. Slaughter involves Trump’s removal of Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic appointee to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Congress prohibited the firing of FTC members unless they demonstrate “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” When the high court agreed to hear the case, it stayed a lower court decision ordering the Trump administration to reinstate Slaughter.

In this case, the high court will likely overrule its 1935 case of Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, in which it upheld a law that forbade the president from firing commissioners on the Federal Trade Commission absent a showing of good cause. The court ruled that Congress can limit the president’s authority to remove members of the FTC and other agencies that perform “quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial” functions.

On its emergency docket, the high court in Slaughter and two other cases temporarily blocked federal district court rulings that had prevented Trump from firing agency heads — of the FTC, the National Labor Relations Board, the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission.

Trump’s argument that he should be able to remove agency heads for any reason is grounded in the “unitary executive” theory. Adherents to that theory believe that Article II of the Constitution establishes a

“hierarchical, unified executive department under the direct control of the President [who] alone possesses all of the executive power and … therefore can direct, control, and supervise inferior officers or agencies who seek to exercise discretionary executive power.”

In the 1988 case of Morrison v. Olson, the Supreme Court upheld a provision of the 1978 Ethics in Government Act, which was enacted in the wake of Watergate. It said that a special prosecutor could be removed by the president only for good cause.

This ruling was an implicit rejection of the unitary executive theory. Antonin Scalia maintained in dissent that the Constitution’s Article II Vesting Clause (which says, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States”) “does not mean some of the executive power, but all of the executive power.”

A majority of the members of the Supreme Court now subscribes to the unitary executive theory, which was once a marginal notion. In Trump v. Mazars, John Roberts wrote for the court that the president is “the only person who alone composes a branch of government,” an opinion he reiterated in Trump v. United States.

If the high court grants the president removal power over independent agencies, those agencies will no longer remain independent. The bodies that regulate our health, safety, labor, environment, and consumer products will be subject to political manipulation by the president.

Removing a Governor of the Federal Reserve Board

Image
President Trump with Fed Chair Jerome Powell in July. (Daniel Torok, White House Photo)

In January, the court will review Trump’s attempt to remove Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors who is serving a 14-year term. He tried to fire Cook for alleged mortgage fraud before she joined the board.

Under U.S. law, a Fed Board member who has been appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate can be removed only “for cause,” a term the law leaves undefined. Trump asserts that his allegations against Cook constitute sufficient cause.

A U.S. district court temporarily blocked Cook’s dismissal while her lawsuit makes its way through the courts. In Trump v. Cook, the Supreme Court delayed rendering a decision and scheduled the case for oral argument.

In this case, the court could decide whether Trump had cause for firing Cook and/or whether Congress has the authority to limit the removal of Federal Reserve Board governors.

Unlike other cases in which the Supreme Court allowed Trump’s firings of agency heads to occur even as the legal challenges proceed, the court allowed Cook to stay on the Fed Board pending the decision in her case. That may mean that the court will distinguish the Federal Reserve Board from other federal agencies, particularly in light of Trump’s repeated threats aimed at Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

Ending Birthright Citizenship

Although not yet on its calendar, the high court will likely review Trump’s January executive order purporting to end birthright citizenship.

Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

In the 1898 landmark decision of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to virtually all individuals born in the U.S. with exceptions for children of foreign diplomats or enemy occupiers. Although the cases also excepted children in Indigenous tribes, Congress granted them citizenship in the 1924 Indian Citizenship Act.

Image
Protesting deportation on International Human Rights Day, Minneapolis, 2017. (Fibonacci Blue, Creative Commons Attribution 2.0)

Trump’s executive order says that only children whose parents are U.S. citizens or permanent residents are U.S. citizens.

Lawsuits were filed in the states of Washington, Maryland and Massachusetts. In all three cases, federal district judges granted injunctions and blocked the operation of Trump’s order nationwide while the legal issue worked its way through the courts. The 1st, 4th, and 9th Circuit Courts of Appeals denied the Trump administration’s requests to stay the injunctions.

On Sept. 26, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to review the cases from the 1st and 9th Circuits that found Trump’s order on birthright citizenship to be unconstitutional. The high court will likely grant review of these cases.

Trump Fashioned a Court to Do His Bidding

Image
Trump nominating Judge Amy Coney to Supreme Court, September 2020 (Andrea Hanks, White House)

By packing the court with three radical right-wingers during his first term, Trump fashioned a reactionary supermajority to do his bidding. Indeed, last year, in Trump v. United States the court held 6-3 that presidents have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for core official acts, and presumptive immunity for all other official acts, while admitting that it is difficult to distinguish official from unofficial acts.

The Supreme Court may decide to review other cases, including Trump’s authority to deploy federal forces to U.S. cities, deport Venezuelans under the Alien Enemy Act of 1798, and refuse to spend funds appropriated by Congress.

As it did when cases testing Trump’s power came before it on the emergency docket, the high court will likely affirm most of his actions, underscoring the immunity it granted him last term, and ratifying his authoritarian program.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/16/u ... authority/

******

As Trump escalates ICE raids, local community defense networks grow

In the heart of Virginia, organizers are bringing together everyday people into the movement against ICE raids

October 16, 2025 by Natalia Marques

Image
Richmond residents receive community defense training (Photo via Richmond Defensa)

The Trump administration has pledged to continue ramping up the controversial operations to detain and deport immigrants. Yet, as his threats intensify, the movement in defense of immigrant rights is rapidly growing and taking shape from the grassroots.

In Chicago, people are standing up to federal agents armed and ready to deploy tear gas and pepper spray. Army veterans in Portland are urging federal troops to disobey Trump’s orders, and in Colorado, residents are rejecting the conversion of several private prisons into ICE detention centers.

In the heart of the state of Virginia, organizers are bringing together waves of new volunteers to learn how to become robust defenders of immigrant rights.

Richmond Defensa responds to escalating ICE raids
“We have rapid response trainings, know your rights trainings. We do workplace-specific trainings, from guitar shops to coffee shops, and we’re going to be doing a construction-specific training in November. This last volunteer meeting, we had a little over 100 people in attendance,” said Violeta Vega, an organizer with Richmond Defensa.

Richmond Defensa was formed this summer by Richmond-based organizers joining the groundswell of outrage against ICE raids in their neighborhoods. According to immigrant rights advocates in Richmond, ICE raids have left immigrant communities afraid to go to work or send their children to school.

Trump’s ICE agents made 4,264 arrests in Virginia alone during the first seven months of 2025. This is nearly three times the number for the entirety of 2024, according to data analysis published by VPM.

Early on the morning of July 30, federal agents stormed the Southwood Apartments complex in the southern part of Richmond, resulting in the detention of a 21-year-old asylum seeker from Honduras, to the distress of his mother, who reported him as a missing person to local police following his arrest by ICE agents. According to eyewitness accounts, agents blocked his car, smashed the passenger window, and dragged him out – and the young Honduran national wasn’t the only one taken that day.

“From talking with educators, there’s so many children who don’t want to go to school because they don’t know if they’ll see their family when they go home,” said Vega, describing her conversations with teachers in Richmond that have been participating in the volunteer meetings and trainings.

But even amid that fear, Vega is seeing more and more people come out to training sessions organized by Richmond Defensa.

A recent event organized by Richmond Defensa featured a room full of dozens of volunteers, gathered around a screen that reads “How we can get ICE out of Richmond”. This event was the group’s volunteer training, where those outraged by ICE raids can learn how to become a part of the “community defense network” according to a description of the event.

“We’ve still seen people come out and remain steadfast and committed, and they have recommitted time and time again to this movement,” Vega told Peoples Dispatch.

Apart from training sessions, organizers with Richmond Defensa have been part of the formation of “Richmond Artists Against Deportations”, which brings together over 100 artists from across the city to sign a petition demanding full legal status for all immigrants. “As artists and cultural producers, we join hands with the people of our city, country, and the immigrant community, to stop this racial profiling campaign, deportation machine and put an end to abductions and family separation,” reads the petition.

Richmond Defensa organizers also marched alongside Richmond residents and union members on Labor Day, holding a banner that read “The people demand, ICE out of RVA”.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/10/16/ ... orks-grow/

*****

U.S. Commerce Chamber Files Lawsuit Over $100,000 on H-1B Visa Petitions

Image
X/ @Reuters

October 17, 2025 Hour: 8:36 am

The fee will make it cost-prohibitive for U.S. employers to retain global talent.

On Thursday, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit over the Trump administration’s 100,000-dollar fee on H-1B visa petitions, saying that the fee will make it cost-prohibitive for U.S. employers to retain global talent.

The litigation dismissed the new fee as “unlawful” because it overrides provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act that govern the H-1B program, including the requirement that fees be based on the costs incurred by the government in processing visas.

“The new $100,000 visa fee will make it cost-prohibitive for U.S. employers, especially start-ups and small and midsize businesses, to utilize the H-1B program, which was created by Congress expressly to ensure that American businesses of all sizes can access the global talent they need to grow their operations here in the U.S.,” said Neil Bradley, chief policy officer at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

To support growth, “our economy will require more workers, not fewer. The president has said he wants to educate, attract, and retain the world’s best and brightest in the U.S., and the Chamber shares that goal.”

H-1Bs complement U.S. workers, lift wages and productivity, power innovation and startups, and making it harder to get H-1B visas is counterproductive, according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.


Earlier this month, the United Auto Workers union, the American Association of University Professors, and several other organizations filed a lawsuit in a federal court in San Francisco, marking the first challenge to the proclamation.

On Sept. 19, U.S. President Donald Trump signed a proclamation raising the fee that companies pay to sponsor H-1B applicants to $100,000. Previously, companies typically paid several thousand dollars for H-1B visas.

U.S. media noted that the hefty fee will affect tech giants such as Amazon, Microsoft and Google, which have long relied on the H-1B visa program to hire foreign employees, including software developers.

CBS reported that the plan could backfire by encouraging U.S. companies to shift jobs overseas, especially in specialized fields such as research and development, and could further deter international students from studying in the United States.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/u-s-comm ... petitions/

*****

The Trump-Putin Phone Call: US Makes Process Concession to Russia and Trump Softens Stance on Tomahawks.
Posted on October 17, 2025 by Yves Smith

There has been a lot of excited commentary about the Trump-Putin phone call, after which it appears Trump over-hyped the idea that another Trump-Putin summit would happen soon. Not even having seen the kinda-sorta readouts, Douglas Macgregor was of the “prove it to me” school in terms of seeing if this gambit amounted to a meaningful step forward. If you read the Trump statement and the recap of the phone call from Putin’s aide Yury Ushakov, reproduced in full from the Kremlin site at the end of this post, there is indeed much less here than the excited reactions would have you believe. Importantly, the Ushakov remarks make clear that the much-ballyhooed idea of a next summit was discussed but not agreed by the Russian side. Recall also that Trump just claimed in a call with Modi that Modi had agreed to stop importing Russian oil. India issued a tortured-so-as-apparently-not-to-call-Trump-a-liar denial.

As we’ll review, the practical significance of this call and follow-up meetings appears more to be to buy both Trump and Putin more room for maneuver domestically. A related element of significance is that the call mildly disproves the recent din of criticism in Russia, even by the Russian Foreign Ministry, that the process that Putin attempted to get started in the Alaska summit was dead. That has been to confirm the argument by hardliners who are apparently getting much the broader public that Putin has been way too soft in his prosecution of the Ukraine war and vis-a-vis Trump, that Russia should quit fooling around with pretending that there is any point in talking to the West, and the only resolution to the war is a military one. Even though yours truly does not follow the Russian press, even at this considerable remove, it has been apparent that the Russian media, including even Putin’s favorite Pavel Zarubin, has been questioning Putin aggressively on this topic, which is out of character for the press pool.

However, this does not change the fact that there will be no negotiated settlement to this war, absent “negotiation” being Russia allowing Ukraine to get some very mild softening of a capitulation agreement or perhaps some “negotiation” with a successor regime in rump Ukraine after the current one decamps to set up a government in exile. There is no overlap between the Russian and the Ukraine/US/EU position. Ukraine and most of the European states will not accept a neutral Ukraine and in particular, a commitment that it not eveh join NATO (or a militarized EU as way to evade the requirement). Ukraine has autonomy; the US cannot do a deal with Russia over Ukraine’s head. Admittedly, the US could compel Ukraine to fall into line by cutting off all intelligence but Congress would not tolerate that. Recall Lindsey Graham threatened Trump with the claim that he had 80 votes, as in more than enough to prevail in an impeachment trial, for his “bone-crushing” sanctions. Graham can presumably round up the same suspects again.

If you look at the Alaska summit, it did accomplish two small things. First, Putin did manage to persuade Trump to drop his insistence on “ceasefire first, negotions next”. Keep in mind that this is a process issue, and not a substance (what does a peace amount to?) issue. As skeptics correctly pointed out, this looked simply like a gambit for Ukraine to regroup and attempt to rearm.

Second, recall that right before the Alaska gathering was set up, Trump was under very heavy pressure by Graham and Richard Blumenthal to impose those “bone crushing secondary sanctions on nations that traded in Russian oil, which would kill trade with China and many others stone cold dead. Trump may have believed other nations might knuckle under but was in the process of finding with India that they were a backfire. So the summit also allowed him to hold off the demands of the Russia hawks. Buying time was productive. First, it became evident at least to some that they had failed with India. Second, the Trump team finally came up with its show-stopper: it would impose them only if the EU did too. Their refusal enabled Trump to wave off Graham’s and Blumenthal’s demands.

Recall that the new escalatory demand has been for the US to equip Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles. The pretense that little green men other than Americans can operate them is even more ludicrous than with other US systems.

Even though experts have debunked five ways to Sunday whether this can even be done. One of many issues: to keep the pretense is that Ukraine is operating the missiles, it would need to be a ground-launched system. The only one that maybe exists now is ginormous and Russia could almost certainly destroy the platform. On top of that wee problem, there are too few missiles to make any difference. See Black Mountain Analysis for an exhaustive analysis of the general issue.

However, this step is massively provocative as a mere idea. Tomahawks are nuclear capable. Even if Russia is absolutely certain none of the Tomahawks fired at it were nuclear-equipped, it cannot allow this precedent. Putin and others have been walking the line of not getting hair-on-fire about this (which would embolden the many nutters in the US and NATO states) while trying to convey that this would be a Very Bad idea.

Putin appears to have made progress on that front in his conversation:

One phone call and Tomahawk Missiles are off the table and Trump is hustling to Budapest to meet with Putin.
Image
— Maine (@TheMaineWonk) October 16, 2025


And the mere timing of the call is a kick in the head to Zelensky, who is in Washington today to demand those Tomahawks. From the BBC:

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet with US President Donald Trump in Washington on Friday, as Trump weighs whether to arm Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles capable of striking deep into Russia.

Of course, Zelensky tried spinning that Russia was operating from weakness. From the same account:

[As Zelensky arrived in the US, his third visit since January, he said Moscow was “rushing to resume dialogue as soon as it hears about Tomahawks”.

But we need to step back and look at the bigger context of the on-again, off again US-Russia talks. Since meetings started in Istanbul, Russia has been trying to get the US to negotiate in a grown-up manner, as in a way that will produce adequate understanding between the two sides so as to lead to detailed agreements that both sides can and will respect.

Here I fail to understand why Russia bothers, save to somewhat reverse the very bad baseline between the two nations. The US has established repeatedly and consistently that it is utterly untrustworthy. So unless the Russian side are idiots, the purpose here is not to reach an agreement, but to improve communications and somewhat reduce the level of misunderstanding and friction, particularly so as to avoid a nuclear war (remember every war game the US has played out between the US and Russia has ended in a nuclear conflagration).

Russia has proposed that each side pursue three tracks and had identified what each team should pursue. When criticized that this was all too low-level, Russia had even offered to deploy more senior officials (even though its team actually was heavyweight; the US suffers from Big Man syndrome, as so apparently anyone less that foreign minister Lavrov will not do).

It was evident that the US was not prepared to do anything. Russia has some initial demands, including returning its impermissibly seized US diplomatic property and re-opening direct flights. The failure to do either points to US unseriousness and/or considerable bureaucratic opposition. I would keep an eye on those two matters as indictors of whether this new initiative is getting anywhere.

Now with that background, where do things actually stand? First from Trump:

Image

So Trump admits to making a “shape of the table” concession to Putin, that there will be lower level discussions first, albeit not all that much lower, before a summit.

Given the US pattern of not preparing for discussions, I would not hold my breath about progress being made quickly. Putin has said he was always willing to meet with Trump if groundwork were laid. One has to wonder what Steve Witkoff said in his three hours in person at the Kremlin to get Putin to relent and commit to the Alaska summit. It took Witkoff five hours to tee up this conversation.

As you can see from Ushakov’s summary below, Putin has not yet agreed to a summit:

In this context, it is worthy of note that the presidents discussed the possibility of holding another personal meeting. This is indeed a very significant development. It was agreed that representatives of both countries would immediately begin preparations for the summit, which could potentially be organised in Budapest, for instance.

Notice the inconsistent tone: “immediately” teeing up an even that is merely a possibility. The squaring of that circle may simply be getting some national leader to agree to be a host if and when things progress. In keeping, Putins’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov is talking down timing expectations. From TASS in Putin-Trump meeting to be prepared gradually, many issues to be resolved — Kremlin:

Preparations for a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump will be in several stages, as the leaders of diplomatic agencies are working on resolving a large number of issues, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said at a press briefing, replying to a question by TASS.

“The thing is that the issue will be worked out by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Secretary of State Rubio,” the Kremlin official noted. “First, they will have a phone conversation and meet, and hold discussions on the topic, begin discuss all issues,” he noted.

“There are a lot of issues – it is necessary to determine negotiating teams,” Peskov said. “Everything will be in stages,” he added.


As to Budapest, perhaps Putin was too polite to point out in real time, assuming Trump suggested Hungary on the call, that Trump is map-challenged:

It is still not known how Putin intends to get to Budapest for a potential summit, considering that Hungary is a landlocked county and all of the countries surrounding it would probably refuse to allow an aircraft operated by the Russian Government, especially one carrying Putin,… Image

— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) October 16, 2025


And this is just tacky:

It is noteworthy that one of the US President’s key arguments centred on the premise that the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine would open up tremendous – and he stressed this – tremendous prospects for the development of US-Russian economic cooperation.

Those impatient with the progress of the conflict may be frustrated that these talks will help Putin in slow-walking the war, which is what they believe he has been doing. But one has to note that even before this call, Mark Sleboda, who has been the most accurate English-speaking commentator in projecting how it would advance, is now discussing Russian operations continuing into 2027. Of course, that pre-supposes no collapse, which could come about due to the electricity war, as opposed to the pace of operations in the east.

However, recall that to Trump’s considerable anger, Russia did not slow its conduct of the war after the Alaska gathering. But there is a case to be made for Russia continuing to (merely) attrit Ukraine. We are seeing government in Europe start to break under the pressure of hysterical demands for more guns as opposed to butter as standards of living are already falling due to the reverberating impact of the rejection of cheap Russian gas. A “right wing” as in not-keen-about-fighting Russia coalition under Andrej Babis is forming a new government in the Czech Republic. Macron is a dead man walking in France. It is an open question as to whether he can hold off calling Parliamentary election until his term ends in May 2027, but both the left and Rassemblement Nationale are against more spending for Project Ukraine. The longer the war continues, the more EU member states will go into revolt. So as much as patience is maddening, there is method to this madness.

____

From the Kremlin website, Commentary by Aide to the President of Russia Yury Ushakov following a telephone conversation between Vladimir Putin and President of the United States Donald Trump:

Aide to the President of Russia Yury Ushakov: Colleagues,

Today in the afternoon, Vladimir Putin had a telephone conversation, the eighth one, with US President Donald Trump.

The conversation lasted almost two and a half hours. Clearly, it was a rather substantive and at the same time very open and frank exchange.

Our President started out by congratulating Donald Trump on his successful efforts to normalise the situation in the Gaza Strip. The US President’s peace work has been duly appreciated in the Middle East, in the United States itself, and in most countries around the world.

Naturally, the Russian side outlined its principled position in favour of a comprehensive Middle East settlement on a generally recognised international legal basis that would ensure lasting peace for all the peoples in that region.

A special emphasis during the conversation was placed on the Ukraine crisis. Vladimir Putin provided a detailed assessment of the current situation, stressing Russia’s interest in achieving a peaceful resolution through political and diplomatic methods.

In particular, it was noted that during the special military operation, the Russian Armed Forces hold full strategic initiative along the entire line of contact. Under these circumstances, the Kiev regime resorts to terrorist methods, attacking civilian targets and energy infrastructure facilities, to which we are forced to respond accordingly.

Donald Trump repeatedly emphasised the imperative of establishing peace in Ukraine at the earliest opportunity. The notion that the Russian-Ukrainian conflict has proven the most intractable issue in all peacekeeping efforts of the US President was palpably evident throughout his remarks during the conversation. In this context, he naturally mentioned his successes in settling eight other regional conflicts.

It is noteworthy that one of the US President’s key arguments centred on the premise that the resolution of the conflict in Ukraine would open up tremendous – and he stressed this – tremendous prospects for the development of US-Russian economic cooperation.

Incidentally, both sides spoke of the profound mutual affinity between the peoples of the two countries, which was so vividly demonstrated during the Second World War. It was underscored that the current state of bilateral relations appears paradoxical against this backdrop.

The issue of potential supplies of long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine was also raised. Vladimir Putin reiterated his position that Tomahawks would not change the situation on the battlefield but would inflict substantial damage to relations between our countries, to say nothing of the prospects for a peaceful settlement.

In this context, it is worthy of note that the presidents discussed the possibility of holding another personal meeting. This is indeed a very significant development. It was agreed that representatives of both countries would immediately begin preparations for the summit, which could potentially be organised in Budapest, for instance.

On a separate note, it should be mentioned that our President highly praised personal efforts of the First Lady of the United States Melania Trump in reuniting Russian and Ukrainian children with their families and asked the US President to convey his very best wishes to his spouse.

Overall, I would say that the telephone contact between the presidents of Russia and the United States was quite useful, and the two leaders agreed to maintain contact.

Thank you for the attention.


https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10 ... hawks.html

******

Trump’s War Against ‘Left-leaning’ Groups Extends Further

There are a number of indicators which lets one predict that the Trump administration, during the next election, will use government forces to severely attack and disrupt all opposition to it.

Trump has send the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents into the cities to harass and arrest alleged illegal immigrants. Due cause is disregarded and the methods used by the agents are brutal.

Trump has also sent National Guard troops into cities where, he claimed, riots were taking place. There were no riots or ‘terrorist incidents’ but the presence of troops is used to create a militarized atmosphere.

A new National Security Presidential Memorandum, NSPM-7 issued by Trump has defined new classes of internal enemies:

With the mainstream media distracted by the made-for-TV drama of James Comey’s indictment, Trump has signed a little-noticed national security directive identifying “anti-Christian” and “anti-American” views as indicators of radical left violence.

In NSPM-7, “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence,” President Trump directs the Justice Department, the FBI, and other national security agencies and departments to fight his version of political violence in America, retooling a network of Joint Terrorism Task Forces to focus on “leftist” political violence in America. This vast counterterrorism army, made up of federal, state, and local agents would, as Trump aide Stephen Miller said, form “the central hub of that effort.”

The Trump administration isn’t only targeting organizations or groups but even individuals and “entities” whom NSPM-7 says can be identified by any of the following “indicia” (indicators) of violence:

anti-Americanism,

anti-capitalism,
anti-Christianity,
support for the overthrow of the United States Government,
extremism on migration,
extremism on race,
extremism on gender,
hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family,
hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and
hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality.
“The United States requires a national strategy to investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence so that law enforcement can intervene in criminal conspiracies before they result in violent political acts,” the directive states (emphasis mine).


That all may sound laughable but these are unfortunately serious policies . The target list includes organizations which do not exist:

The FBI and the homeland security department are actively investigating “Antifa” individuals and organizations that the Trump administration has branded domestic terrorists. Actions so far include collecting intelligence on Antifa “affinity” groups, canvassing the FBI’s vast informant network for tips about Antifa, and scrutinizing financial records, two sources involved in the investigations tell me.

There are no ‘antifa’ organizations. ‘Antifa’ is the idea of fighting indications of fascism. From time to time local interest groups may claim to do so for this or that reason. This category ‘antifa’ was likely chosen because it can be applied to any group that opposes government policies.

Today Yves Smith reports of another enforcement agency that Trump will use to destroy opposition to him:

The war against Trump’s perceived political enemies keeps escalating. The Wall Street Journal provides new detail on how the Trump Administration intends to use an IRS criminal unit, whose members bear arms, as part of his campaign against “left-leaning” organizations. This fallows a Reuters account describing how the Trump Administration intends to use the Department of Justice and DHS to pursue “left wing” groups that allegedly fomented violence.

Now to the press accounts. Key sections from the Journal’s report:

The Trump administration is preparing sweeping changes at the Internal Revenue Service that would allow the agency to pursue criminal inquiries of left-leaning groups more easily, according to people familiar with the matter.

A senior IRS official involved in the effort has drawn up a list of potential targets that includes major Democratic donors, some of the people said.

The undertaking aims to install allies of President Trump at the IRS criminal-investigative division, or IRS-CI, to exert firmer control over the unit and weaken the involvement of IRS lawyers in criminal investigations, officials said. The proposed changes could open the door to politically motivated probes…

Among those on the list are the billionaire Democratic donor George Soros and his affiliated groups…


Many on the left will not mind any attack on George Soros as his organization is well know for financing foreign color revolutions against legitimate leftist rulers. We can however be assured that Trump wont stop with them:

The list includes Soros’ Open Society Foundations; ActBlue, the funding arm of the Democratic Party; Indivisible, a grassroots coalition opposed to Trump policies and the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, a Los Angeles-based group.

Other groups on the list include two Jewish nonprofits that oppose Israel’s war in Gaza – IfNotNow and Jewish Voice for Peace.


There is unfortunately little institutional or political opposition that can restrain Trump:

The push against domestic groups and their donors comes amid Trump’s attacks on law firms, universities and the media, and his deployment of National Guard troops to some Democratic-run cities.

Timothy Naftali, a presidential historian and former director of the Richard Nixon presidential library, said Trump and Nixon were similar in their desire to punish political enemies and silence critics, but a pliant Republican-controlled Congress and a cabinet packed with loyalists are enabling Trump to go further.

“That’s why this particular moment is more dangerous for the rule of law in the United States than the 1970s were,” Naftali said.


All these are ominous signs that Trumps war on the political opposition will escalate further. Seymour Hersh’s sources are warning of this:

What’s happening now may be a trial run for the use of those forces to interfere on the behalf of the president and the Republican Party in states where the Democratic Party has a chance to win crucial seats in next fall’s Congressional elections. I’ve been told by someone with inside knowledge that planning for such action is now under way in the White House.

The ‘coerced dominance’ that has marked Trump’s brutal approach to foreign policy will now being applied to domestic issues and legitimate opposition.

Russell Vought, Trumps’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, are the men behind this.

The scary thing is that there is, so far, little or any opposition to these plans and only few warnings about their consequences.

Posted by b on October 16, 2025 at 14:43 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/10/t ... rther.html

(Well, Soros got nothing to do with us. None of these 'donors'(owners!) do. When real opposition arises it will not have dep pockets, it will have millions of feet on the street.)
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Sat Oct 18, 2025 3:11 pm

WHERE THERE’S TRUMP SMOKE, THERE’S NO TRUMP FIRE – TOMAHAWK RETREAT FROM THE UKRAINE

Image
By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

Vladimir Zelensky arrived more than thirty minutes late for lunch at the White House on Friday afternoon. The Ukrainian delegation, which included Andrei Yermak, was already too late to dissuade President Donald Trump (lead image) from backing down on his threat to send Tomahawk missiles through NATO to Ukraine for launching at Russian targets deep inside the country.

“We’ll be talking about that,” Trump replied to a Ukrainian reporter at the lunch table press conference. “That’s why we are here…Fair question, exactly as he [Zelensky] told you to say it. But we’re going to be talking about it.”

Trump then told the press he foreshadows a delay in the decision on the missiles in order for a new round of negotiations to take place. “We need Tomahawks and we need a lot of other things we’ve been sending over the last four years…Hopefully, they [Ukraine] won’t need it. Hopefully, we’ll be able to get the war over without thinking about Tomahawks.”

Trump has agreed to Putin’s negotiating offer of the day before.

He has also accepted Putin’s refusal to accept Zelensky and Trump in a troika summit meeting together. “Most likely it will be a double meeting…we’ll be involved in threes but it may be separated.”

Trump began covering his retreat on the eve of Zelensky’s arrival, when a reporter asked the President about his telephone call with Putin: “What did you tell them about the Tomahawks? Did you discuss the Tomahawk missiles?” Trump replied: “Well, we talked about it a little bit, didn’t say much, but I do say to you, you know, we need Tomahawks for the United States of America too. We have a lot of them, but we need them. I mean, we can’t deplete for our country. So, you know, they’re very vital, they’re very powerful. They’re very accurate, they’re very good, but we need them too. So, I don’t know what we can do about that.”

In Moscow Russian officials said that in the telephone conversation Putin had issued a counterattack threat, warning the Tomahawks and American crews operating them would be a target if they crossed the border. Putin also proposed to let their officials, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, negotiate next week. If they agreed, then Putin and Trump would hold a fresh summit meeting in Budapest.

Emphasizing the counterattack, according to the readout of the telephone call from Yury Ushakov, Putin’s foreign affairs assistant, Putin told Trump: “The Russian Armed Forces hold full strategic initiative along the entire line of contact.” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters: “Our military knows what to do, and they possess the strength and all the necessary resources. Everything will certainly be done to ensure, first, national security, and second, our country’s interests,”

Following public reporting of the call, a source reflecting General Staff thinking commented: “The Tomahawks will be blown up in transit, hit at their launch sites, or shot down in flight. Of course, it will be another red line crossed, but I think Putin’s pen is out of ink at this point.”

“We’re not losing people”, Trump said across the table from Zelensky. “We’re not spending money. We’re getting paid for the ammunition and missiles and everything else we are sending… That’s not what we’re in it for. We’re in it to save thousands of lives…that’s why we’re in it…I love solving wars. You wanna to know why. I like stopping people being killed. And I’ve saved millions and millions of lives. And I think we’re going to have success with this war.” Trump was conceding the risk of US casualties in the Ukraine is deterring his decision on the Tomahawks.

The day before, Trump had tried a smokescreen for what had been said in the conversation with Putin: “I did actually say, would you mind if I gave a couple of thousand Tomahawks to your opposition? I did say that to him. I said it just that way. He didn’t like the idea. He really didn’t like the idea. No, I said it that way. You have to be a little bit light-hearted sometimes, but no, he doesn’t want Tom — Tomahawk is a vicious weapon. It’s a vicious offensive of incredibly destructive weapon. Nobody wants Tomahawks shot at him.”

Watch the 37-minute lunch table press conference. The verbatim transcript can be read here.

Image
On the US side, to left of President Trump Marco Rubio, Peter Hegseth, and Steven Witkoff. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pz8nYP6mE10

As the press conference concluded, Trump was asked if he suspected Putin of playing for time. “Yeah I am. But, you know, I’ve been played all my life by the best of them. And I came out really well. So it’s possible, yeah, a little time. It’s alright. I think I’m pretty good at this stuff…I think he wants to make a deal.”

Trump was asked to respond to the proposal for a “Putin-Trump” tunnel across the Bering Strait between Alaska and Russia. The plan was tweeted by the Kremlin negotiator of wealth transfers with the US, Kirill Dmitriev. In Dmitriev’s text, he appealed to Elon Musk to lobby Trump for the scheme, claiming that with technology from Musk’s Boring Company, the costs of such a project could be reduced from more than $65 billion to less than $8 billion.

Image

Image
Source: https://x.com/kadmitriev/status/1978879906424447414 and https://www.ft.com/content/d6c0f603-c04 ... b7db38ef8e

According to the Financial Times report, “The Boring Company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.“

Trump replied: “I just heard about that one. We’ll have to think about that.”

https://johnhelmer.net/where-theres-tru ... more-92589

******

On the Precipice of Authoritarian Rule: The Trump Administration’s Military Occupation of America
Posted by Internationalist 360° on October 17, 2025
Nick Turse

Image
US police clear an intersection after declaring an unlawful assembly during the “No Kings” protest against the Trump administration in Los Angeles on Saturday. (AFP-Yonhap)

Earlier this month, President Donald Trump threatened to unleash the armed forces on more American cities during a rambling address to top military brass. He told the hundreds of generals and admirals gathered to hear him that some of them would be called upon to take a primary role at a time when his administration has launched occupations of American cities, deployed tens of thousands of troops across the United States, created a framework for targeting domestic enemies, cast his political rivals as subhuman, and asserted his right to wage secret war and summarily execute those he deems terrorists.

Trump used that bizarre speech to take aim at cities he claimed “are run by the radical left Democrats,” including Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and San Francisco. “We’re going to straighten them out one by one. And this is going to be a major part for some of the people in this room,” he said. “That’s a war too. It’s a war from within.” He then added: “We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military.”

Trump has, of course, already deployed the armed forces inside the United States in an unprecedented fashion during the first year of his second term in office. As September began, a federal judge found that his decision to occupy Los Angeles with members of California’s National Guard — under so-called Title 10 or federalized status — against the wishes of California Governor Gavin Newsom was illegal. But just weeks later, Trump followed up by ordering the military occupation of Portland, Oregon, over Governor Tina Kotek’s objections.

“I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect War ravaged Portland and any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists,” Trump wrote on Truth Social late last month. And he “authoriz[ed] Full Force, if necessary.”

When a different federal judge blocked him from deploying Oregon National Guardsmen to the city, he ordered in Guard members from California and Texas. That judge then promptly blocked his effort to circumvent her order, citing the lack of a legal basis for sending troops into Portland. In response, Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act — an 1807 law that grants the president emergency powers to deploy troops on U.S. soil — to “get around” the court rulings blocking his military occupation efforts. “I think that’s all insurrection, really criminal insurrection,” he claimed, in confused remarks from the Oval Office.

Experts say that his increasing use of the armed forces within the United States represents an extraordinary violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. That bedrock nineteenth-century law banning the use of federal troops to execute domestic law enforcement has long been seen as fundamental to America’s democratic tradition. However, the president’s deployments continue to nudge this country ever closer to becoming a genuine police state. They come amid a raft of other Trump administration authoritarian measures designed to undermine the Constitution and weaken democracy. Those include attacks on birthright citizenship and free speech, as well as the exercise of expansive unilateral powers like deporting people without due process and rolling back energy regulations, citing wartime and emergency powers.

Image
Members of the National Guard patrol the National Mall in Washington, D.C., on Sunday, weeks after U.S. President Donald Trump ordered them into the city. (Daniel Becerril/Reuters)

A Presidential Police Force

U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ruled last month that Trump’s deployment of federal troops to Los Angeles, which began in June, was illegal and harkened back to Britain’s use of soldiers for law enforcement purposes in colonial America. He warned that Trump clearly intends to transform the National Guard into a presidential police force.

“Congress spoke clearly in 1878 when it passed the Posse Comitatus Act, prohibiting the use of the U.S. military to execute domestic law,” Breyer wrote in his 52-page opinion. “Nearly 140 years later, Defendants — President Trump, Secretary of Defense Hegseth, and the Department of Defense — deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles, ostensibly to quell a rebellion and ensure that federal immigration law was enforced… Yet there was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law.”

The judge ruled that the Pentagon had systematically used armed soldiers to perform police functions in California in violation of Posse Comitatus and planned to do so elsewhere in America. As he put it, “President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have stated their intention to call National Guard troops into federal service in other cities across the country… thus creating a national police force with the President as its chief.”

In the face of that scathing opinion, the president has nonetheless ramped up his urban military occupations, while threatening to launch yet more of them. “Now we’re in Memphis… and we’re going to Chicago,” Trump told a large crowd of sailors in Norfolk, Virginia, during a celebration of the Navy’s 250th anniversary earlier this month. “And so we send in the National Guard, we… send in whatever’s necessary. People don’t care.”

As October began, Trump had already deployed an unprecedented roughly 35,000 federal troops within the United States, according to my reporting at The Intercept. Those forces, drawn from the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, and National Guard, have been or will soon be deployed under Title 10 authority, or federal control, in at least seven states — Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, New Mexico, Oregon, and Texas — to aid and enforce the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant agenda, while further militarizing America. Other Guardsmen, being sent to cities across the country ranging from Memphis to New Orleans, are serving under Title 32 status, which means they will officially be under state control, a measure Trump uses in states with Republican governors.

National Guard forces deployed to Washington, D.C. as part of Trump’s federal takeover of the district in August are operating under the same Title 32 status. But with no governor to report to, the D.C. National Guard’s chain of command runs from its commanding general directly to the secretary of the Army, then to Pete Hegseth, and finally to Trump himself.

In September, a long-threatened occupation of Chicago began with an ICE operation targeting immigrants in that city, dubbed “Midway Blitz.” A month later, the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago sued Trump, seeking to block the imminent deployment of federalized Illinois and Texas National Guard troops to that city. A federal judge in Chicago blocked the deployment of troops in Chicago for at least two weeks. The Justice Department appealed but an appeals court ruled Saturday that while the troops can remain there under federal control, they can’t be deployed.

“They are not conducting missions right now,” a Northern Command spokesperson told TomDispatch on Tuesday, admitting that she didn’t know exactly what the troops were doing.

The president has also threatened to deploy National Guard troops to Baltimore, New York City, Oakland, Saint Louis, San Francisco, and Seattle.

“When military troops police civilians, we have an intolerable threat to individual liberty and the foundational values of this country,” said Hina Shamsi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project. “President Trump may want to normalize armed forces in our cities, but no matter what uniform they wear, federal agents and military troops are bound by the Constitution and have to respect our rights to peaceful assembly, freedom of speech, and due process. State and local leaders must stay strong and take all lawful measures to protect residents against this cruel intimidation tactic.”

Image
Federal law enforcement agents stand guard as they are confronted by community members and activists for reportedly shooting a woman in the Brighton Park neighborhood on October 4, 2025 in Broadview, Illinois.

“Living in a Dream World”

Trump’s Portland order drew pushback from Oregon’s Democratic lawmakers, local leaders, and outside experts, who said there was no need for federal troops to be deployed to the city. “There is no national security threat in Portland,” Governor Kotek announced on social media. “Our communities are safe and calm.” Independent reporting corroborated her assessment.

After Kotek conveyed that to Trump in a phone call, the president seemed to briefly question whether he had been misled about an antifa “siege” there and the city being “war-ravaged.” As he recounted, “I spoke to the governor, but I said, ‘Well, wait a minute, am I watching things on television that are different from what’s happening? My people tell me different.’”

Days later, despite countless reports that there was neither a war nor a siege underway in Portland, Trump posted on social media that Kotek was “living in a ‘Dream World’” and returned to peddling lies about the city. “Portland is a NEVER-ENDING DISASTER. Many people have been badly hurt and even killed. It is run like a Third World Country,” he wrote on TruthSocial. “We’re only going in because, as American Patriots, WE HAVE NO CHOICE. LAW AND ORDER MUST PREVAIL IN OUR CITIES, AND EVERYWHERE ELSE!”

Judge Karin Immergut of the U.S. District Court in Oregon issued a temporary restraining order preventing the Trump administration from sending 200 Oregonian National Guard troops for a 60-day deployment in Portland. As she concluded in her opinion, she expected a trial court to agree with the state’s contention that the president had exceeded his constitutional authority.

Trump immediately took aim at her — despite the fact that he had appointed her to office during his first term — saying that she “ought to be ashamed of herself.” He then claimed, without any basis, that Portland was “burning to the ground.” Trump then made further hyperbolic claims about the city and threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act. “Portland is on fire. Portland’s been on fire for years,” he said, describing the situation as “all insurrection.”

The same Northern Command spokesperson told TomDispatch on Tuesday that the federalized troops in Oregon were also in a holding pattern. “They are on standby,” she said.

The president’s Portland order followed a series of authoritarian actions that have pushed the nation ever closer to becoming a genuine police state. In August, reports emerged that the Pentagon was planning to create a Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force that would include two groups of 300 National Guard troops to be kept on standby at military bases in Alabama and Arizona for rapid deployment across the country. (That proposed force would also reportedly operate under Title 32.)

The Pentagon refused to offer further details about the initiative. “The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe,” said a defense official, speaking at the time on the condition of anonymity. “We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.”

Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order claiming to designate antifa — a loose-knit anti-fascist movement — as a “domestic terror organization.” He also issued National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, which directs the Justice Department and elements of the Intelligence Community and national security establishment to target “anti-fascism… movements” and “domestic terrorist organizations.” Such enemies, according to the president, not only espouse “anti-Americanism” and “support for the overthrow of the United States Government,” but also are typified by advocacy of opinions protected by the First Amendment, including “anti-capitalism,” “anti-Christianity,” and “hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.”

After referring to the “war from within” during his address to the military’s top officers, he cast his political rivals as subhuman and claimed that they needed to be dealt with. “We have to take care of this little gnat that’s on our shoulder called the Democrats,” he told the sailors during the Navy’s 250th anniversary celebration.

The Trump administration has also admitted that it’s waging a secret war against undisclosed enemies without the consent of Congress. According to a confidential notice from the Department of War sent to lawmakers, the president has unilaterally decided that the United States is engaged in a declared state of “non-international armed conflict” with “designated terrorist organizations” or DTOs. It described three people killed by U.S. commandos on what was claimed to be a boat carrying drugs in the Caribbean last month as “unlawful combatants,” as if they were soldiers on a battlefield. And that was a significant departure from standard practice in the long-running U.S. war on drugs, in which law enforcement, not the U.S. military, arrests suspected drug dealers rather than summarily executing them.

As Brian Finucane, a former State Department lawyer and a specialist in counterterrorism issues, as well as the laws of war, pointed out, the White House’s claims that Trump has the authority to use lethal force against anyone he decides is a member of a DTO is extraordinarily “dangerous and destabilizing.” As he put it: “Because there’s no articulated limiting principles, the President could simply use this prerogative to kill any people he labels as terrorists, like antifa. He could use it at home in the United States.”

Image
National Guard troops wear gas masks during protests against federal immigration sweeps, in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 12, 2025. REUTERS/David Swanson

Police State USA

The Trump administration’s military occupations of American cities, its deployment of tens of thousands of troops across the United States, its emerging framework for designating and targeting domestic enemies, its dehumanization of its political foes, and its assertion that the president has the right to wage secret war and summarily execute those he deems terrorists have left this country on the precipice of authoritarian rule.

With Trump attempting to fashion a presidential police force of armed soldiers for domestic deployment, while claiming the right to kill anyone he deems a terrorist, the threat to the rule of law in the United States is not just profound but historically unprecedented.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/10/ ... f-america/


Trumpism and Peace Through Strength
Posted by Internationalist 360° on October 16, 2025
Carmen Navas Reyes

Image
Photo: The USS Iwo Jima, an amphibious assault ship, one of the US ships deployed in the Caribbean

Donald Trump is striving to leave his doctrine as his legacy to the world, which, as a guiding principle, seeks to reposition the United States as the holder of absolute military power and to disparage multilateralism. This is because we are no longer dealing with the world’s leading economic power, and this proportionally affects its military capacity.


From Monroe to Trump, Unilateralism

The famous Monroe Doctrine(MD) of 1823, which the peoples of the South know very well, is the first major unilateral declaration by the United States: “America for Americans.” Under its hegemony, the sphere of influence and the right to intervene in this vast region stretching from Mexico to Argentina were established. The Doctrine is the grandmother of the Trump doctrine in its intention to place the sovereignty of this country above that of the region.

The Roosevelt Corollaryof 1904: President Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) extended Monroe’s doctrine, justifying preemptive military intervention in the region to prevent instability. It is the clearest expression of US interventionism. With this thesis, he invaded Panama and Haiti in our region, and the Philippines in Asia. It could be said that this is the most direct lineage of “peace through strength” prior to Trump.

Truman Doctrine, 1947, and containment: Here, for the first time, unilateralism gives way to multilateralism led by the United States. A system of alliances (NATO) is built and action is taken under the umbrella of international institutions (UN) to contain a rival. It is the opposite of Trump’s approach.

Bush Doctrine (Post-9/11): Preemptive war and the promotion of democracyby force, especially after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the Twin Towers. Similar to Trump in the use of force, but different in its objective; Bush sought to transform regions with nations more to his liking (nation-building); Trump has no interest in pretending to care about other countries.

“Peace through Strength” vs. Multilateral Peacebuilding Mechanisms

According to what was ideally the UN Multilateral Model, which turns 80 this year, peace is built through diplomacy, international law, cooperation, and development aid; the use of force is always a last resort and is exercised under the mandate of the Security Council. The UN Charter is based on the equal sovereignty of states and the prohibition of the use of force except in self-defense or with express authorization.

The Trump Model (“Peace through Strength”) has come to try to put a definitive end to the UN. On 29 January 2014, in Havana, Cuba, during the Second Summit of the (CELAC), the commitment to peace and stability was reaffirmed by declaring Latin America and the Caribbean a Zone of Peace, to consolidate an area free of conflict and tension, promoting dialogue and cooperation as key tools for resolving any dispute. Marco Rubio’s latest tour of the Caribbean and other Latin American nations was aimed at breaking this consensus. On 15 September 2025, President Nicolas Maduro called for an extraordinary meeting of CELAC in an attempt to restore this spirit.

In the first months of his second term, Trump has given us indications that, for him, peace is a byproduct of overwhelming military power (“Peace through Strength”), thereby giving a nod to the Ronald Reagan Administration. Deterrence through the threat of military force replaces diplomacy and is a tool of first choice—not a last resort—and is exercised unilaterally if a threat to national interests is perceived.

The War on Drugs in the Caribbean as an Expression of the Trump Doctrine

The Caribbean as a “third border” and narcotics transit zone. Traditionally, the approach to this region has been mixed (security cooperation + development aid). Under the new Trump doctrine, military operationsare being intensified to an unprecedented level; interdiction is being prioritized over cooperation programs to combat or treat addiction, and countries are being pressured with the threat of sanctions if they do not fully cooperate with U.S. security agendas (reminiscent of the Big Stick).

This is the context for the current operations in the Caribbean Basin under purely military and security command, with less emphasis on coordination with civilian agencies or local governments in terms of cooperation and with the incentive of being able to advance its regime change strategy by identifying Venezuela as its main enemy in this area. The region is treated as a stage on which to apply force to protect the southern border, backyard, or vital zone of the US, not as a community of partner nations with which to build long-term peace and stability. It is “peace” imposed through strength.

The Symbolism of Power: Department of “War” and the Security-Diplomacy Merger

The idea of renaming the Department of Defense (DOD) to the historic Department of War (DOW) is not just anecdotal; the Trump administration is attempting to create a symbol of its power: the DOW implies an openly offensive, aggressive, and active stance, which unambiguously expresses the desire to revive the spirit of the United States, the world’s greatest military power, and once again put an end to the post-World War II model, including the UN and international law.

Marco Rubio undoubtedly symbolizes the deliberate weakening of diplomacy for the United States; his dual role as Secretary of State and main National Security Advisor puts him in the same sinister position as Henry Kissingerin the 1970s, and this does not bode well, as the past has shown for countries such as Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua, but also for the popular movements of the Global Souththat have already glimpsed what these decisions entail.

US foreign policy is increasingly based on security criteria (migration, drug trafficking, terrorism,communications), and diplomacy is limited to lobbying for interests and adding satellite countries.

Finally, these changes suggest a profound and lasting transformation in the mindset of US foreign policy, which will likely continue to influence the future, regardless of the administration, so we may be facing a new doctrine: Trumpism. Donald Trump is attempting to leave this legacy to the world as a guiding principle, characterized by an attempt to reposition the US as the holder of absolute military power, national sovereignty, and contempt for multilateralism. This is because we are no longer dealing with the world’s leading economic power, and this proportionally affects its military and other capabilities, which is why Trump also finds himself in a sprint, which only he seems to want to take on, fighting on several fronts at the same time.

The incipient Trump doctrine, outlined in his speechto the 80th UN General Assembly, would then be a hybrid that, on the one hand, revives Monroe’s isolationist unilateralism and Roosevelt’s big stick, rejects Bush’s responsibility for nation-building, while burying Truman’s multilateral framework for containing rivals or adversaries.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/10/ ... -strength/

******

(From the Department of Talk Is Cheap:)

‘We’re Not Going to Forget’: Pritzker Warns Trump Enforcers Miller, Homan, Bovino That Immunity Not Forever
Posted on October 17, 2025 by Yves Smith

Yves here. The fact that Pritzker is resorting to threats in response to ICE thuggery is a sad testament to the state of the rule of law and political will in the US. There seem to be far too few ways to impede the Trump abuses, save the Dems returning to power, which is not at all a given, even assuming we still have elections.

By Jon Queally, staff writer at Common Dreams. Originally published at Common Dreams

Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker is warning top lieutenants of President Donald Trump’s violent and unlawful immigration enforcement policies that they will not always have the protection of presidential immunity and that lawmakers in the future will seek to hold them to account for their behavior, including unlawful orders given at the behest of the president.

With episodes of violent raids, unlawful search and seizures, and the mistreatment of immigrants, protesters, journalists, and everyday citizens, Pritzker, in a Thursday evening interview on MSNBC, specifically named White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, border czar Tom Homan, and Gregory Bovino, the Customs and Border Patrol commander operating in the Chicago area, as people whose actions will not be forgotten.

Pritzker said that all the people serving the president, “including all the way down to ICE agents, can be held accountable when there’s a change in administration that’s willing to hold them accountable when they break the law.”

Calling out Miller in particular, the governor charged that the xenophobic Trump advisor, who has been a leading champion and director of the harsh crackdown measures and federal deployments in Los Angeles, Washington, DC, Chicago, and elsewhere, has “clearly ordering people to break the law.”

Critics and legal experts have said the deployments themselves are unconstitutional, and the heavy-handed tactics of agents have resulted in numerous violations of civil liberties and constitutional protections.

Miller should know, said Pritzker, that “it may be three years from now that he is held accountable, but I think it’s important for them to know that whatever they do now, it’s not like we’re going to forget and it’s not like we don’t have a record of what they’re doing.”

On Thursday, ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee Rep. Jeremy Raskin (D-Md.) led a letter from Democrats on the committee demanding that the Trump administration “immediately end its unlawful and violent enforcement campaign in the Chicagoland region, warning that the Administration’s actions are undermining public safety, violating constitutional rights, and destabilizing communities.”

According to a statement from Raskin’s office:

For months, personnel from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have employed military-style tactics in enforcement operations across Chicago, spreading fear, chaos, and violence. Such extreme enforcement tactics have only escalated since the Administration’s announcement of Operation Midway Blitz in September. In early October, President Trump went further, federalized the National Guard—over the objections of Illinois Governor JB Pritzker—and ordered troops to Illinois to enable these unlawful and unconstitutional assaults on Chicagoland residents.

In October alone, DHS personnel have shot two people and publicly advanced self-serving narratives that were immediately contradicted by body camera and surveillance footage, handcuffed an Alderperson at a hospital checking on the welfare of a constituent being detained by ICE, indiscriminately deployed tear gas in front of a public school and against civilians and local law enforcement, placed a handcuffed man on the ground in a chokehold, shot a pastor in the head with a pepper ball, thrown flashbang grenades at civilians, and raided an entire apartment complex and reportedly zip-tied U.S. citizens, children, and military veterans for hours.

In a letter addressed to Trump, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, and Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Todd Lyons, the 18 Democratic members of the committee, including Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García, who represents the Chicagoland district, said, “The Administration claims the mantle of law and order, yet its actions in the Chicagoland area demonstrate it is a catalyst for lawlessness and dysfunction.”

“Violently abusing residents, kidnapping parents and children and disappearing them into detention facilities without access to basic necessities, and illegally deploying the militaryagainst a great American city,” the letter continues, “does nothing to make anyone safer—in fact, it jeopardizes the safety and well-being of every community members.”

Demanding a halt to the attacks by federal agents in Chicago, the lawmakers said “[t]he American people want a common- sense approach to public safety and immigration, not violent tactics that traumatize and destabilize communities. They want leadership, not theater. We urge you to step back from the brink and use your positions to enhance public safety, instead of undermining it.”

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10 ... rever.html

******

Trump Admits Complicity in Genocide
October 17, 2025

In his speech to the Knesset, Trump told Netanyahu: “We make the best weapons in the world, and we’ve got a lot of them. And we’ve given a lot to Israel … [And] you used them well,” writes Marjorie Cohn.

Image
President Donald Trump addressing the Israeli Knesset in Jerusalem on Oct. 13. (White House /Daniel Torok)

By Marjorie Cohn
Special to Consortium News

As Donald Trump congratulates Israel for its conduct of the genocide in Gaza, he should be charged with aiding and abetting genocide, not given the Nobel Peace Prize.

In his speech on Monday to the Israeli Knesset, Trump spent an hour bragging about how he ended the “war” in Gaza and “an age of terror and death,” declaring, “This is the historic dawn of a new Middle East.”

He decried the “thousands of innocent Israeli civilians” who “were attacked by terrorists in one of the most evil and heinous desecrations of innocent life the world has ever seen; the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust,” adding, “The cruelty of October 7th struck to the core of humanity itself. Nobody could believe what they were witnessing.”

Conspicuously absent from Trump’s remarks was any reference to the ubiquitous images of the nearly 68,000 Palestinians killed (possibly as many as 680,000, U.N. Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese said on September 15), including at least 20,000 children, and the more than 170,000 injured by Israel during its two-year campaign of genocide in Gaza.

Trump failed to mention the 641,000 Gazans — about one-third of all Palestinians in Gaza — who have experienced catastrophic famine as Israel used mass starvation as a weapon of war and denied the entry of humanitarian assistance into Gaza.

And Trump omitted the fact that Israel has destroyed the civilian infrastructure across Gaza. It disabled most of the hospitals, damaged approximately 97 percent of the schools, and damaged or destroyed roughly 90 percent of all housing units.

Instead, Trump boasted about the weapons he furnished to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu and praised Israel’s use of them to massacre Palestinian people:

“We make the best weapons in the world, and we’ve got a lot of them. And we’ve given a lot to Israel, frankly. I mean, Bibi would call me so many times, ‘Can you get me this weapon, that weapon, that weapon?’ Some of them I never heard of, Bibi, and I made them. But we’d get them here, wouldn’t we, huh? And they are the best. They are the best. But you used them well.”

With those words, Trump admitted his complicity with Israel in its commission of genocide in Gaza.

Aided & Abetted Israel’s Genocide

Image
Some of South Africa’s legal team on Jan. 26, 2024, for the ICJ order on indication of provisional measures in Pretoria’s genocide case against Israel. (ICJ)

In its Jan. 26, 2024, ruling, the International Court of Justice found a “plausible” case that Israel was violating the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Citing the definition of genocide in the Convention, the ICJ ruled:

“Israel shall take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all genocidal acts, particularly (a) killing members of the group; (b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and (d) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.”

The ICJ also decreed that “Israel shall take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza.”

Nevertheless, Israel persisted in committing genocidal acts, including killing and wounding Palestinians, and depriving them of food, medicine, fuel, and water, while displacing them multiple times.

“It is often said that there is no daylight between Washington and Tel Aviv — a relationship whose deadly consequences are etched into the mass graves of Gaza,” according to a petition filed on Oct. 7, 2025, by Taxpayers Against Genocide (TAG) and Palestinian-Americans against the United States in the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

“After October 2023, the United States shifted from ally into public accomplice,” the petition continues.

“For almost two years, it has knowingly and deliberately sustained Israel’s assault on Gaza. By providing weaponry, technology, funding, and diplomatic shield, the U.S. has entwined itself in Israel’s genocidal machinery, turning what might have been a short-lived offensive into a protracted campaign of annihilation, conducted with impunity.”

Image
Trump with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and others after disembarking Air Force One at Ben Gurion International Airport in Israel on Oct. 13, 2025. (White House/Daniel Torok)

On March 2, 2025, Israel declared a “total blockade” on Gaza, refusing to allow the entry of all essential goods, including food, medicine, water, fuel, and electricity, “devastating a population already ‘starving, sick, and dying,’” according to the petition. Netanyahu said the blockade was executed “in full coordination with President Trump and his people.”

Since January 2025, the Trump administration has delivered more than $12.5 billion in major military assistance to Israel, including weapons it has used to commit genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza. An Israeli official told Axios: “In most calls and meetings Trump told Bibi: ‘Do what you have to do in Gaza.’”

Moreover, ensuring that the carnage would continue, Trump’s administration provided diplomatic and political cover for Israel’s genocide. It vetoed two U.N. Security Council resolutions calling for an immediate and permanent ceasefire and the allowance of humanitarian aid into Gaza, one on June 4 and the other on Sept. 18.

“The United States bears legal responsibility under international law for its continued provision of military, financial, and diplomatic support to Israel amid Israel’s commission of genocidal acts against the Palestinian population in Gaza,” the petition states. It adds:

“This support has persisted despite widespread, credible warnings from international bodies that Israel’s actions amount to international crimes and constitute, or at minimum pose a serious risk of constituting, genocide.”

The Genocide Convention prohibits the failure to prevent genocide and creates a duty upon states to refrain from complicity in genocide, triggering both state and individual criminal responsibility. Complicity occurs when a state knowingly aids or assists another state in the commission of genocide, including by furnishing the means to enable or facilitate the genocide.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (I.C.C.) provides for the prosecution of individuals who have aided and abetted genocide, including by “providing the means for its commission.”

Trump and his high officials should be investigated and charged by the I.C.C. for aiding and abetting genocide, and prosecuted for complicity in genocide in national courts under universal jurisdiction.

What Happens Next?

Image
An aerial view showing destruction in Rafah, in the Gaza Strip, after Israeli forces withdrawal and as the ceasefire took hold, Jan. 21, 2025. (UNRWA/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY 4.0)

Meanwhile, Gazans are slowly making their way back to their land, arriving to find piles of rubble where their homes once stood. The Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt remains closed to the entry of humanitarian aid. Only 300 of the 600 aid trucks agreed to in the ceasefire deal have been allowed to enter Gaza.

Israeli attacks on Palestinians in Gaza continue. At least 38 people have been confirmed killed since last Friday, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, and Hamas has handed over the bodies of 10 Israeli captives.

In a statement Wednesday, Hamas said it had handed over “the corpses it could access,” adding, “As for the remaining corpses, it requires extensive efforts and special equipment for their retrieval and extraction. We are exerting great effort in order to close this file.”

Two of Trump’s advisers told reporters they don’t think Hamas has violated the ceasefire agreement about the recovery of the bodies of Israeli hostages because they lack heavy equipment required to locate the remains. But Israeli officials told the Trump administration that Hamas isn’t doing enough to retrieve the bodies and cautioned that the deal can’t proceed to the next phase until progress is made.

There is no doubt that the ceasefire is a welcome development — one that should have happened long ago. But the subsequent steps in Trump’s plan and how it will be implemented remain vague and elusive.

Far from constituting a peace plan, it is a blueprint to continue Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian territory and deny the Palestinian people their lawful right to self-determination.

The plan provides that Palestinians will be governed by a colonial “Board of Peace” chaired by Trump, composed of many non-Palestinians. And it calls for the imposition of an “international stabilization force” not under Palestinian control.

After Trump announced his plan, Netanyahu said that the Israel Defense Forces “will remain in most of the [Palestinian] territory” and that Israel did “absolutely not” agree to the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Trump told CNN on Wednesday that Israeli forces could “go back in as soon as I say the word” if Hamas doesn’t comply with the terms of the ceasefire. He has appointed himself arbiter of Hamas’s compliance. And Trump has threatened to disarm Hamas “violently” if Hamas refuses to disarm “in a reasonable period of time.”

In the meantime, “nothing has changed in the dehumanization and the attitude of this particular Israeli government and its belief that it has the power to wipe out Palestine as a nation, as a people and as a country,” Israeli historian Ilan Pappé said on Democracy Now!

On Tuesday, several U.N. agencies and humanitarian organizations said that approximately $70 billion will be needed to reconstruct Gaza.

Over the past two years, millions of people around the world have taken to the streets in solidarity with the Palestinians. The Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions movement has gone mainstream.

Calls for states to implement arms embargoes will persist, as well as demands for legal accountability for Israeli and U.S. leaders, including Donald Trump, for enabling Israel’s horrific campaign of genocide.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/17/t ... -genocide/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Sun Oct 19, 2025 5:41 pm

Zelensky Gets the Fig Amid Trump Admin's Whacky Day
Simplicius
Oct 18, 2025

The Trump circus is off the rails this week—and maybe that’s not an altogether bad thing.

The pied ringleader and his comic-book cast of loons seem to have taken the art of trolling and ‘strategic ambiguity’ to the next level by befuddling everyone.

After needling both sides with the Tomahoax scam, Trump expectedly revealed the farce by turning Zelensky’s triumphant White House homecoming into a humiliation ritual instead. (Video at link.)

The Tomahawks are officially off the table….for now.

For his part, “Keg Stand” Hegseth—after just last week threatening to increase costs on Russia—appeared to sport a conspicuous Russian flag for a tie to the meeting with the Ukrainian delegation. (Video at link.)

Granted, he wore the same tie to a Netanyahu meeting earlier in the year—so it wasn’t necessarily an on-occasion impulse-buy. But you’d think the choice to wear it here was deliberate—either that or the years of beer-sloshed, negative-G hypoxia secondary to keg-stand inversions have severely degraded his conscientious faculties.

Again what we see is Trump having likely euchred the world in gaining another extension on his perpetual ‘two-more-weeks’ sham of kicking the ceasefire can down the road. The Tomahoax served as lure to drive another PR moment to re-energize “talks” in order to continue the hoodwink that the peace process is again reaching some turning point or culmination.

In reality, no such thing is happening, as the US has proven entirely incapable of so much as even passingly acknowledging Russian security interests necessary for the war’s conclusion. So, what can the newly-proposed Budapest talks possibly achieve?

In lead up, Trump has even again exclaimed that the war should simply be cut off at the current line of contact, because anything else would be ‘too complicated’, exasperatedly adding that both sides could just declare themselves ‘winners’. This kind of lazy finagling only works in Trump-World™, and the statement alone proves there’s virtually nothing left to talk about; the exercise is meant merely to lead the media through another round of PR joyrides.

Medvedev summarized it best:

Dmitry Medvedev:

During his meeting with the tearful beggar, Trump said something obvious yet interesting: “Let Russia and Ukraine both declare themselves winners.” That kind of compromise sometimes happens after wars — but not in this one.

It’s not just that Russia seeks victory on clearly defined terms — that’s a given. The problem is that the current Banderite clique in Kiev can never be seen as “victorious” at home under any circumstances. The drugged-up ghoul and his cronies know this perfectly well. Losing territory will never be forgiven, not by the rabid nationalists, nor by political rivals. For them, the end of the war means the end of the regime. That’s why Trump’s formula doesn’t apply here.

Still, the self-proclaimed peacemaker played his “Tomahawk diplomacy” card well — stirring global opinion in his usual style. He wrapped it up in classic fashion, hinting at the dispatch of nuclear submarines before jokingly admitting: “Sorry, brother, we need them ourselves.” To his credit, Trump remains firm in his stance: “It’s not my war — the senile fool is to blame.” Even the fool, however, was against sending long-range weapons to the Banderites.

But this, of course, won’t stop the ongoing flow of new arms to Kiev. The story isn’t over — and we must be ready for whatever comes next.


Beyond the vaudevillian theatrics of Hegseth’s tie and the overall bizarre optics of the Zelensky meeting, the day was filled with further oddities and improprieties alike.

Here Trump delivered a very presidential F-bomb on account of Maduro: (Video at link.)

Not long afterwards, the White House press secretary was even more choicely decorous in her response to HuffPost irritants:

Image
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/white-ho ... 732e24eb66

Given all that, HuffPost asked the White House: Who picked Budapest?

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded minutes later with: “Your mom did.”

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung after a minute added the far more succinct: “Your mom.”

After HuffPost asked Leavitt if she thought her response was funny, she replied:

“It’s funny to me that you actually consider yourself a journal [sic]. You are a far left hack who nobody takes seriously, including your colleagues in the media, they just don’t tell you that to your face. Stop texting me your disingenuous, biased, and bullshit questions.”

HuffPost is devastated, and is fearful of asking any more questions, let alone escalating with “I’m rubber, you’re glue,” or some such.

Quel cirque !


Those who may scoff at such whimsical analysis should recall the Alaska meeting we were amongst the first to dismiss as a spectacle, covered up to present a PR coup for Trump.

This has now been proven correct, given new revelations by Financial Times which are quite the sizzling read—particularly this section:

Image

Time and time again our skeptic glance has proven true here, from the Alaska kabuki, the Tomahoax debacle, to the phony B-2 strike on Fordow, now proven by multiple sources as having been theater.

That said, there’s nothing wrong with pursuing the Budapest talks, and good things could still come of them, particularly because Putin and Trump’s combined geopolitical valence is enough to cause major ripples throughout servile Europe.

Now, just as in the Alaska meeting ‘coverup’, sources indicate yesterday’s Trump-Zelensky meeting was a total bust:

Image
https://www.axios.com/2025/10/17/trump- ... hite-house

“One of the sources said the meeting ‘was not easy,’ while the other simply said ‘it was bad.’...

In reality, the sources said, Zelensky pushed hard on Tomahawks but Trump pushed back and showed no flexibility...

Zelensky’s number one priority from the visit was to get commitments from Trump not just on Tomahawks but on a variety of weapons systems Ukraine wishes to obtain, his chief of staff told Axios ahead of the meeting.

Trump offered no such commitments.”

The Tomahoax was a lure to stage another production, while feeding Trump’s gluttonous ego—always an important secondary, if not primary, objective; anyone who doubts this fact need only glimpse the latest official Trump social media offering:

Image

But just as there are kernels of truth to every lie, there exists an acorn of potential for some positive outcome in every theatrical sham. Plus, the Tomahoax saga is likely not at its end, as Trump could later revive the ‘threat’ if Putin again fails to concede to the latest nonsensical offers of unconditional surrender ceasefire.

(More, Sit Rep at link.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/zel ... amid-trump

******

A kind of scoundrel
October 18, 10:23

Image

A kind of scoundrel

Trump released former Republican Congressman George Santos from prison. The US President announced that he had signed the corresponding order, according to the New York Post ( https://nypost.com/2025/10/17/us-news/t ... reat-life/ ).

"George Santos was something of a 'scoundrel,' but there are plenty of scoundrels in our country who aren't forced to serve seven years in prison ," the American leader wrote in Truth Social.

Santos was serving a sentence for embezzling campaign funds for personal expenses.

"Detochkin is guilty, of course, but he... isn't guilty."
It's not him, it's life.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10135474.html

The Arc de Triomphe in Washington
October 18, 7:40 PM

Image

A design for a large triumphal arch that Trump wants to erect in Washington. He is said to be personally involved in its development. The plan
is to erect it in 2026, to coincide with the 250th anniversary of the United States. It's possible that it will be called the "Trump Arch."

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10137031.html

Brown answer
October 19, 7:48 PM

Image

Trump posted a video of himself wearing a crown in the cockpit of a fighter jet, bombing protesters against him with feces. (Video at link.)

Yesterday, moderately large anti-Trump protests took place in the United States. Trump's stance on them is quite clear.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10138427.html

Google Translator

(More like a Clown Prince than a king.)

******

Trump threatens to “kill” Hamas over the execution of Israeli-backed gang members in Gaza

The sharp warning came a few days after the US President said he gave approval to the Palestinian resistance group to “eliminate” what he described as “very bad gangs”.

October 19, 2025 by Peoples Dispatch

Image
US President Donald Trump. Photo: The White House

US President Donald Trump threatened late Thursday, October 16, that he would endorse a military action against Hamas if it continues to target local gangs hired by Israel in the besieged Gaza strip.

“If Hamas continues to kill people in Gaza, which was not the Deal, we will have no choice but to go in and kill them. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social account.

Trump’s stern warning was proclaimed, days after he was asked by reporters onboard Air Force One about the executions of who they considered Hamas’ rivals, suggesting they are a sign that Hamas is reestablishing its authority in the besieged Gaza Strip.

The answer of the US president then was totally contradictory to his Thursday post on Truth Social, because he confirmed to reporters that the US had given approval to the Palestinian group to do so “for a period of time” to eradicate crimes, and stop problems.

“They do want to stop the problems, and they’ve been open about it, and we gave them approval for a period of time,” Trump said.

“We are having ’em watch that there’s not going to be big crime or some of the problems that you have when you have areas like this that have been literally demolished,” he added.

Trump reiterated his acceptance of Hamas’s executions of members affiliated to “very, very bad gangs” on Tuesday, October 14, when reporters raised questions again regarding the matter.

“They did take out a couple of gangs that were very bad, very, very bad gangs. And they did take them out, and they killed a number of gang members, and that didn’t bother me much, to be honest with you. That’s okay,” the US president stated.

Who are these gangs and why does Hamas execute their members?
Media reports surfaced on Monday, October 13, that Hamas carried out field executions in Gaza City against a number of people, who are accused of being collaborators with the Israeli occupation and outlaws.

A recently-established Hamas unit called Rade’, which translates to deterrence force, was quoted saying that it has continued to carry out a comprehensive security campaign in different governorates across the war-torn enclave. The campaign resulted in arresting “numerous traitors and lawless elements.”

Rade’ confirmed that it will continue conducting investigations, and prosecuting whoever it finds complicit in Gaza city.

The force further clarified that it has imposed its control over sites belonging to an armed militia, carried out military sweep operations, and arrested members of those militias accused of shooting at displaced people and attacking civilians.

The prosecution of the Israeli-backed militias dates back to July 2025, when the Joint Operations Room of the Palestinian resistance factions in Gaza issued a statement, branding the local armed gang Abu Shabab “traitors for hire”. Back then, the resistance factions warned “those who follow their path of aiding the occupation” that they “would receive no mercy”.

The statement was released a few days after the Revolutionary Court under the Military Judiciary in Gaza issued a 10-day ultimatum for Yasser Abu Shabab, who is the leader of the gang, to surrender himself to stand trial over charges of “treason and collaboration with hostile entities, forming an armed gang, and leading an armed rebellion.”

Abu Shabab was previously identified by the United Nations as a main aid looter, who has operated under the “passive or active” protection of the Israeli Occupation Forces.

In addition to aid looting, Abu Shabab and his militia of mercenaries were found complicit in selling some of the aid on the black market, and massacring hundreds of starved people at aid delivery points of the notorious US-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).

The Abu Shabab gang is not the only lawless Israeli-backed group operating in Gaza
It is worth noting that the Abu Shabab gang is not the only lawless Israeli-backed militia operating in Gaza, but is the most prominent among them.

In southeastern Khan Younis, around 40 militants operate with the Hossam al-Astal gang.

Additionally, the Al-Majayda Clan was an active militia in Khan Younis until Monday, when it agreed to hand over its unlicensed weapons to Hamas and affirmed its support for the resistance movement in combating “security chaos”, following mediation efforts.

In Gaza City and the northern areas of the strip, the Doghmosh clan has been active. Two other militant groups still operate in the north as well, including a group under the leadership of Rami Helles, particularly active in Gaza City’s Shujaiya, Zeitoun, and Tuffah districts, and another led by Ashraf al-Mansi, operating in Jabalia, Sheikh Radwan, Nasr, and Beit Lahia.

In central Gaza, Hamas seems to have imposed its control after it crushed the Abu Khammash and Abu Moghaiseb factions, who emerged around Deir al-Balah before the January ceasefire, and reappeared once the genocidal Israeli aggression resumed in March.

Palestinian activist and journalist Saleh al-Jafarawi was among those killed by the local gangs following the ceasefire
Although a US-brockered ceasefire deal was finally announced by US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, October 8, Israel seems to have continued its assassinations in the Gaza Strip indirectly through its operatives.

These operatives still attack civilians and loot their properties. Moreover, they clash with members of resistance factions including Hamas, spread chaos, and provoke infighting.

On Sunday, October 12, famous Palestinian activist and journalist Saleh al-Jafarawi (28) was shot dead by members of an “armed militia”, while he was covering clashes in Gaza city.

Al-Jafarawi was celebrated by the Palestinian grassroots for documenting Israel’s crimes throughout its two-year genocidal aggression on Gaza.

This in turn gave him prominence among his nation and Palestine supporters across the world, but at the same time made him a target for Israeli media incitement campaigns. Therefore, for many, Al-Jafarawi’s murder was a targeted assassination, which Israel assigned its local operatives to carry out on its behalf.

https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/10/19/ ... s-in-gaza/

*****

U.S. “No Kings” Protests Reject Trump’s Authoritarian Administration

Image
“No Kings” protests in Chicago. Photo: X/ @johncusack

October 19, 2025 Hour: 12:21 am

Millions of people took to the streets across the United States this Saturday—in cities such as New York, Washington, and Miami—under the slogan “No Kings” to protest President Donald Trump’s growing authoritarianism.

Protesters voiced a wide range of concerns: opposition to immigration raids and healthcare cuts, rejection of the militarization of cities, and criticism of electoral redistricting efforts seen as favoring Republican control in next year’s midterm elections.

Organizers estimate that nearly seven million people joined the demonstrations, which were held simultaneously in more than 2,500 cities and towns across all 50 states, making it the largest protest since Trump returned to power last January.

The No Kings protests aren’t for Trump to see.

They’re for the marginalized so they know they aren’t alone.

…for unaffected people so they know this isn’t normal.

…for Republicans so they know their blind obedience to fascism won’t be tolerated.
pic.twitter.com/rCFGgFxCR8

— Melanie D'Arrigo (@DarrigoMelanie) October 18, 2025


The protests unfolded amid rising political tension, fueled by Trump’s decision to deploy the military to several cities governed by Democrats, claiming it was necessary to fight crime and support Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) racially biased raids.

Major rally points included Times Square in New York, the U.S. Capitol in Washington, and downtown Chicago.

Demonstrations were also held in Atlanta, Boston, Honolulu, Houston, Miami, Nashville, New Orleans, San Diego, and San Francisco, as well as in several European cities like Berlin, Paris, and Rome, which organized solidarity events.

Thank you to the millions of Americans who turned out in small communities and big cities all over this country to say loudly and boldly:

No more kings.

In America, We the People will rule.

Image

— Bernie Sanders (@BernieSanders) October 18, 2025


Trump spent the day at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida with no official schedule and is expected to return to Washington on Sunday. He did not comment publicly on the protests, even though several occurred just miles from his property in Palm Beach County.

However, a meme shared by the White House on X appeared to mock the demonstrations, as it showed Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance wearing crowns while poorly photoshopping Mexican hats onto House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.

We’re built different.

Have a good night, everyone. 👑

Image

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) October 19, 2025


This was the second “No Kings” mobilization, following the first on June 14, which coincided with Trump’s birthday and reportedly drew around five million participants.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/u-s-no-k ... istration/

If Bernie the Sheepdog had had the will and the guts to stand up to the DNC we wouldn't be at this place now. He got a lot of gall talking that shit now. Cue 'Bringing In The Sheep'...
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Wed Oct 22, 2025 2:30 pm

Did you see an infantile, juvenile flight of fancy?

Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence 22 Oct 2025

Image
President Donald Trump shared this AI video in response to No Kings marches. Image: The Independent

Did you see signs by victims of
One Big Beautiful Bank Job
Showing up in mighty millions,
Flexing Power Of The People?

Did you see frightened juvenile, AI-generated content —
In response?
Did you see the fecal Führer’s fascist flight of fancy — the
Diapered dictator dropping dreck, Making America Grate Again?

Did you see them go from Government Shutdown
To government shit-down — lousy, loose stool
Luftwaffe flooding the Zone with elephant excrement —
Making America Grate Again?

Did you see power of the numerically mighty People
Scare fascists shitless — into fertilizing
New crops of activists, militants and revolutionaries
Growing robust — exponentially — and urgently!

© 2025. Raymond Nat Turner, The Town Crier. All Rights Reserved.

https://blackagendareport.com/did-you-s ... ight-fancy
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Thu Oct 23, 2025 3:31 pm

Lawless Operations: State of Exception in the Caribbean
22 Oct 2025 , 10:08 am .

Image
At least 32 people have been killed by the United States in the Caribbean on Trump's orders (Photo: Getty Images)

The confirmation of the murder of at least 32 people in U.S. military operations off the Venezuelan coast represents another step in the long sequence of attacks that make up the regime change agenda developed by the United States against Venezuela.

The victims were not exclusively Venezuelan; among the bodies were Colombian, Ecuadorian, and Trinidadian citizens, which demonstrates that the events occurred in jurisdictional areas under the sovereignty and control of the coastal states, while the US government attempts to present them as actions carried out within international waters.

This narrative attempts , in fact, to disguise an action characterized by disproportionate use of force and a lack of evidence to support it.

The multinational scale of the victims reveals the indiscriminate nature of the actions, which also demonstrates a complete disregard for the norms of international humanitarian law and the law of the sea.

In essence, these are extrajudicial executions disguised under the pretext of the "war on drugs," but in practice they constitute military operations directed from the highest political level in the United States.

The US violates the United Nations Charter once again.
The condemnation by United Nations ( UN) experts confirms the seriousness of the situation and provides a legal basis for challenging Washington's unilateral and illegal actions .

In their statement of October 21, 2025, the experts recalled that covert operations and threats of using armed force against Venezuela constitute direct violations of national sovereignty and the Charter of the United Nations.

They stressed that even if the U.S. accusations were founded, the use of lethal force in international waters without an adequate legal basis constitutes a violation of the international law of the sea and amounts to extrajudicial executions.

The statement identifies a pattern of coercive intervention under false justifications, while warning of the implications for peace and security in the Caribbean.

Indeed, the US military presence in the region has increased significantly, in parallel with the expansion of lethal operations against civilian vessels, under the guise of " fighting drug trafficking" and the alleged "terrorism" of criminal groups .

The experts stressed that such actions violate the principle of non-intervention and the right of peoples to self-determination, pillars recognized in the United Nations Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, ratified by the United States in 1992 .

They also warned that any attempt to impose regime change through the use of external force constitutes an even more serious violation of international law.

In their final appeal, the United Nations representatives urged Washington to immediately cease illegal threats and attacks and to reaffirm its commitment to multilateralism, respect for state sovereignty, and the peaceful resolution of disputes.

"The long history of external intervention in Latin America must not be repeated," the experts stated.

The climb
It is known that warships, bombers, drones, spy planes and marine units have been used in this offensive, which creates a theater of operations with immediate offensive capacity, although it should be noted that such deployment has not been authorized by the US Congress despite the intense campaign by the Trump administration to use the emergency caused by "narcoterrorists" as an excuse.

Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth confirmed the deaths of three people and the destruction of a vessel allegedly linked to Colombia's National Liberation Army (ELN), marking the seventh attack carried out by U.S. forces in the Caribbean since early September.

The announcement, made through social media, was accompanied by an aerial surveillance video of less than 30 seconds showing the explosion of a ship, with no evidence provided to support the Pentagon's claims.

This lack of evidence is a constant in the history of US interventions, from Iraq to Libya; that is, first the narrative is constructed, then the action is executed, and finally, the justification is sought on the ground.

Hegseth , a former Fox News host, further introduced dangerous rhetoric by calling " Latin American cartels " "the al-Qaeda of the Western Hemisphere," seeking to equate the Caribbean and South American theater with the post-9/11 West Asian theater of operations in an attempt to legitimize war as an instrument of foreign policy.

These statements coincided with a new episode of confrontation between Donald Trump and Colombian President Gustavo Petro.

After the Colombian president denounced the murder of an innocent fisherman during a U.S. attack, Trump responded by accusing him of being a "drug trafficking leader" and threatened to suspend aid to Bogotá.

Such exchanges expose the expansion of the discursive and operational conflict into Colombian territory, in a context where Washington is attempting to consolidate a strategic siege in northern South America by controlling maritime and political enclaves in Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, and now Colombia.

Republican Senator Rand Paul and other members of Congress have questioned the lack of transparency and illegality of the actions, stressing that the government doesn't even know the names of the people it has executed.

"They have to be charged with something. Evidence has to be presented. So all these people have been destroyed without us knowing their names, without any evidence of a crime," Paul said on NBC.

However, the administration has opted to maintain opacity and is somehow hiding behind the argument that these are "unlawful combatants," a legal category created to try to avoid the application of the Geneva Conventions.

Even the resignation of the commander of the Southern Command, Admiral Alvin Holsey, occurred after Trump authorized the CIA to carry out covert operations.

That resignation, of course, raised new alarms about the legality and morality of the operations. Various sources report that Holsey expressed concern about the lack of legal basis for the attacks and the possibility that they constitute war crimes.

His abrupt departure also suggests that, upon learning of the plan against Venezuela, he may have considered it absurd— or an insane order—and preferred not to become an accomplice to an action whose legality and proportionality were in doubt.

The Pentagon, for its part, has responded with generic statements about the "legality" and "precision" of the operations, without specifying which standards they rely on or to which international bodies they have been held accountable.

Announcing covert operations
Trump's announcement that he has authorized clandestine CIA operations in Venezuelan territory raises the conflict to a new level of seriousness. This was announced just the day before Holsey's departure .

By definition, a covert operation seeks to conceal the identity of the sponsor or allow plausible deniability of their involvement, according to National Security Council Directive 10/2 of 1948.

In this case, however, the US government has broken even with that tradition of denial by publicly admitting that the CIA operates in Venezuela and that ground attacks could occur.

This public recognition amounts to a confession of responsibility for a planned policy of aggression .

In fact, Ambassador Samuel Moncada had warned about this scenario in 2024 , pointing out that every overt Washington operation contains a covert component. Behind illegal sanctions , there is always a military and intelligence strategy aimed at destabilizing the Venezuelan state.

This symbiosis between economic coercion and military action is not new ; it has been part of the pattern of US intervention since the Cold War, but in the current case it is manifested with greater danger because the aggression is no longer disguised as diplomacy or carried out in secret.

The US government itself acknowledges its role in an undeclared war against Venezuela and presents it as part of its national security policy.

The United States has violated international law on numerous occasions; it is doing so now with the same impunity and rhetorical flourishes that have preceded other interventions.

But reducing this episode to a mere question of legality would be to remain superficial because what is at stake is the political spectrum , power .

These attacks against vessels and civilians, regardless of nationality, confirm that Washington has expanded its operational scope to the enclaves surrounding Venezuela, seeking to dominate maritime corridors and logistical points that will facilitate further escalation.

Such an expansion of operational space is the deliberate construction of conditions that can fuel a fabricated and forced casus belli , intended to legitimize further, more aggressive steps.

By deploying its assets in Trinidad, Guyana, and the Colombian coast, the US administration is establishing a ring of control that limits Caracas's strategic options and puts pressure on neighboring governments . This creates a scenario in which legality is subordinated to political action.

To what extent will the international community tolerate a country reshaping sovereign realities through the selective use of force? If the response is inaction, the precedent will be set and will serve as a guide for future aggressions at any level.

https://misionverdad.com/globalistan/op ... -el-caribe

Google Translator

*****

Five Reasons Why Trump Is Once Again Escalating Against Russia
Andrew Korybko
Oct 23, 2025

Image

They’re all primarily due to his belief (however possibly mistaken) that Putin won’t risk tensions spiraling out of control in response.

It was earlier assessed that “The Next Putin-Trump Meeting Might Lead To Something Tangible This Time Around” due to newfound mutual interests in reaching a deal, but then Trump canceled the Budapest Summit on the grounds that he didn’t think it’d be worth his time. He also imposed new energy sanctions on Russia and might be lying about not having approved Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles. Trump’s latest flip-flop surprised many but can be attributable in hindsight to the following five reasons:

----------

1. He’s Driving A Hard Bargain To Coerce Putin Into Maximum Concessions

Russia’s minimum goal is to obtain full control over Donbass, without which Putin can’t hypothetically freeze (let alone end) the war without “losing face”. Trump refuses to coerce Zelensky into withdrawing from there, instead believing that he can coerce Putin into freezing the conflict without first controlling Donbass, thus amounting to maximum concessions. That’s still unacceptable for Putin and might always be, but Trump seems to be taking his refusal personally, perhaps seeing it as a challenge to his authority.

2. The Warmongers Appear To Have Once Again Made Him Change His Mind

Trump’s announcement was made during a meeting with NATO chief Mark Rutte, thus suggesting that warmongers like him, Zelensky, Lindsey Graham, and others still have his ear. He’s infamously capricious, with many having noticed that he tends to be influenced by the last person who talked to him. This idiosyncrasy makes him comparatively easier to manipulate than most, which has enormous implications in terms of how certain lobbies and foreign forces could influence US policy throughout his second term.

3. Trump Seems To Truly Believe That The Any Escalation Will Remain Manageable

Trump wouldn’t try to drive a hard bargain and end up giving in to the warmongers unless he truly believed that any Russian-US escalation would remain manageable. His calculation presupposes that there won’t be any overwhelming response from Putin that would then push them towards climbing the escalation ladder all the way to the top. It’s predicated on the assumption that Russia is weaker than the US and will therefore back down if significantly pressured. That’s a gamble to take.

4. He’s Also Not Abandoning His Stratagem Of Dividing-And-Ruling Eurasia

Senior refinery executives told NDTV that “Flows of Russian oil to major Indian processors are expected to fall to near zero” after the latest sanctions, which could divide the newly solidified Russia-India-China (RIC) triangle if true. Trump might also expect that China will do the same to get him to curtail the additional 100% tariffs that he threatened to impose on it next month. He could still be proven wrong on both counts, but in any case, his latest escalation shows that he’s still trying to divide-and-rule Eurasia.

5. Trump Might Be Betting On Chinese Non-Compliance With The Latest Sanctions

China isn’t expected to comply with the US’ latest sanctions since it’ll gain by purchasing at a steep discount whatever oil Russia might soon be unable to sell to India. The interim Sino-US trade deal might then collapse if Trump imposes his threatened tariffs on China and makes their curtailing conditional on it dumping Russian oil. He might even want this predictable sequence of events to unfold, however, so as to justify accelerating his planned “Pivot (back) to (East) Asia” for more muscularly containing China.

----------

Trump’s reason for once again escalating against Russia is primarily due to his belief (however possibly mistaken) that Putin won’t risk tensions spiraling out of control in response even if he never agrees to the maximum concessions being demanded of him. The US might have also concluded, whether rightly or wrong, that India is the weak link in RIC which can be coerced into breaking up BRICS. To be clear, these explanations don’t equate to endorsements, but they cogently account for what Trump just did.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/five-rea ... once-again

Or just mebbe he's a dummy for a gang of competing ventriloquists...

*****

Due Process & Trump-Ordered Murder
October 23, 2025

After a hitch in the administration’s speedboat-killing operations, there are now living plaintiffs with standing to challenge the president’s authority, writes Andrew P. Napolitano.

Image
U.S. Marines with the special-operations capable 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit conduct live fire drills aboard USS Iwo Jima in the Caribbean Sea on Sept. 17 in support of the U.S. Southern Command mission, Department of War-directed operations and the president’s priorities. (U.S. Marine Corps/Tanner Bernat/Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain)

By Andrew P. Napolitano

President Donald Trump’s use of the U.S. military to kill persons on speed boats in international waters, or in territorial waters claimed by other sovereign nations — all 1,500 miles from the U.S. — has posed grave issues of due process.

The U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of due process requires it for every person, not just Americans. The operative language of the Fifth Amendment is that “No person … shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”

The Trump administration has claimed that it can kill whomever it designates as an unlawful enemy combatant — it prefers the political phrase “narco-terrorist” — and the due process it provides is the intelligence gathered by American spies and the White House analysis of that intelligence.

This secret analysis, the government’s argument goes, satisfies the president that the folks he has ordered killed are engaging in serious and harmful criminal behavior, and somehow is a lawful and constitutional substitute for the jury trial and its attendant procedural protections that the Constitution commands.

To be fair, I am offering an educated guess as to the administration’s argument. The reason we don’t know the argument precisely is that the Department of Justice calls it classified. This is, of course, a non sequitur. How could a legal argument possibly be secret in light of well-settled First Amendment jurisprudence? It can’t.

The Supreme Court has ruled consistently that there are no secret laws or secret rationales for employing the laws. Moreover, it has ruled that the First Amendment assures a public window on government behavior whenever it seeks to take life, liberty or property.

Obama’s Secrecy Precedent

Image
Anwar al-Awlaki, 2008. (Muhammad ud-Deen/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 3.0)

The last time we went through efforts to obtain the government’s legal argument for presidential targeted killing was during the Obama administration. When President Barack Obama ordered the C.I.A. to kill Anwar al-Awlaki and his son — both natural born American citizens — it, too, claimed a secret legal rationale.

Yet some brave soul who had access to that rationale leaked it to the press. The rationale likened killing al-Awlaki and his 16-year-old son to police shooting at fleeing bank robbers who are shooting at the police.

The Obama justification was absurd, as al-Awlaki was not engaged in any violent acts. He had been followed by 12 intelligence agents during his final 48 hours of life. Those agents couldn’t legally arrest him, because he hadn’t been charged with a crime, but in the Obama logic, they could legally kill him.

When those of us who monitor the government’s infidelity to the Constitution publicly pointed out the flaws in the Obama argument, it reverted to the argument that I suspect the current administration is secretly using. Namely, that its secret internal deliberations are a constitutionally adequate substitution for traditional due process.

It gets worse.

Before al-Awlaki and his son were murdered, al-Awlaki’s father unsuccessfully brought an action in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., against President Obama, in which he argued that the president was planning to kill his son, and he sought an injunction against that.

The DOJ argued that there were no such plans in the works and — even if there were — the father lacked standing to seek the injunction since, by his own admission, the president’s plans were aimed at his son, not him. The Constitution requires standing — only those truly and directly and uniquely harmed by a defendant may invoke the protection of a federal court.

During the oral argument on the government’s successful motion to dismiss the elder al-Awlaki’s case, the court opined that the son — the one who was murdered mere weeks after this case was dismissed — would have had standing to sue. The son and the grandson were literally evaporated by a C.I.A. drone while peacefully sitting at an outdoor cafe in Yemen.

Trump’s Premise Based on No Survivors

Image
Trump at the White House last week. (White House /Juliana Luz)

Now back to the Trump administration and its murdering persons on the high seas. The stated public reason for doing so — this is a political reason, not a valid legal one — is that it is better to kill these folks before the drugs they are carrying reach their willing American buyers.

But these killings are premised on success, so that there are no survivors to bring a cause of action against the president and the government. Last week, the Department of Defense announced to its dismay that in one of the seven attacks on speedboats in the Caribbean, it failed to kill all the passengers, and two survivors were “rescued” and arrested by the U.S. Navy.

Surely the administration did not expect this legal quagmire. An arrest can only be based on probable cause of crime. What probable cause did the Navy have to arrest the survivors after it had destroyed their boat and any evidence in the boat? Of course, the government won’t say.

What legal rationale did the administration employ when deciding what to do with the survivors? Again, the government won’t say. If they were the narco-terrorist monsters — again, a political phrase, not a legal one — that President Trump has claimed them to be, why did the Navy set them free?

This is not a matter of trusting President Trump or not, or of approving of his goals or not. It is a matter of complying with due process procedures as old as the republic.

The sine qua non of due process is a fair, transparent and indifferent evaluation of evidence by a neutral judicial officer before guilt can be established and punishment administered — all pursuant to statutes duly enacted.

Channeling Justice Felix Frankfurter, the history of human freedom is paying careful attention to the procedures the government employs.

Now the administration has on its hands that which it most feared — living plaintiffs with standing to challenge the president’s authority in a federal court. They have claims for attempted murder and kidnapping. Those of us who believe that the Constitution means what it says welcome this challenge.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/23/d ... ed-murder/

Never liked Da Judge but as we live in a bourgeois state bourgois laws do matter.

*****

Trump’s ICE troopers are making America resemble a third world dictatorship

Robert Bridge

October 23, 2025

While the Trump administration has a duty to arrest immigrants who arrived in the country by illegal means, it is failing to enforce the law in a respectable and civilized way.

the United States is increasingly playing out scenes reminiscent of a brutal fascist regime as officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) show an absolute disregard for human rights as they hunt down illegal immigrants.

In the small California town of Campo, which sits less than a mile from the U.S.-Mexico border, witnesses described the terror they experienced as they watched masked men round up agricultural workers employed on farms – young and old alike – and force them into unmarked cars.

In most cases, the officials wear plain clothes and refuse to identify themselves, thus making it impossible to distinguish between immigration agents and imposters. And with no number to call to track down their loved ones, people have no choice but to report the disappearances as potential kidnappings.

One young man asked as his friend was shoved into an unmarked van, “What kind of police go around in masks without uniforms and identification badges?”

Citizens feel desperate as there is nothing that can be done to rein in the power of the ICE troops. Filing complaints with the Department of Homeland Security is a futile gesture because the office that once handled them has been dismantled. There is little hope of holding individual agents accountable for alleged abuses because there is simply no way to reliably learn their identities. This has led to a situation where people are afraid to venture onto the street to perform simple chores, like go grocery shopping or pick up their children from school.

Across the nation, people must accept the grim reality that there are virtually no limits on what federal agents can do to achieve President Donald Trump’s goal of mass deportations. The town of Campo has proven to be a testing ground for much larger raids and even more violent arrests in places like Portland, Oregon and Chicago, Illinois and elsewhere.

Last month, the Supreme Court cleared the way to permit racial profiling by a local ICE facility in Los Angeles. Earlier this month, a raid on a Chicago tenement building, in which young children were reportedly pulled from their homes at night without clothes, sparked public outrage.

Meanwhile, Trump has warned that he may invoke the centuries-old Insurrection Act that empowers presidents to deploy troops on U.S. soil.

“Don’t forget I can use the Insurrection Act,” he told Fox News. “Fifty percent of the presidents…have used that. And that’s unquestioned power.”

In the view of Trump’s opponents, ICE is worse than having members of the U.S. military patrolling urban areas. It has become an unaccountable secret police force, which is making the United States resemble a third world country.

One retired high-ranking official with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said it was a “sad day in America” as he provided his personal views on the situation. Speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, the official described the new realities ever since Trump became president: “I’ve seen people outside of their immigration court hearings dragged off to prison where they can’t contact relatives or speak to a lawyer. Groups of masked men nabbing people off the street in broad daylight and sending them to some country – like Ecuador – where there exists torture and severe human rights abuses. This is what America has become in the year 2025.”

Meanwhile, ICE is enjoying a bonanza in financial resources. In addition to its annual operating budget of $10 billion a year, the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill included an added $7.5 billion a year for the next four years for recruiting alone. As part of its hiring efforts, the agency has reduced age, training and education standards and has offered recruits signing bonuses as high as $100,000.

“Moving forward without vetting new recruits is creating a dystopian reality on the streets of America,” the former DHS official said. “This is very frightening.”

White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson praised ICE conduct and accused their political opponents of making “dangerous, untrue smears.”

“ICE officers act heroically to enforce the law, arrest criminal illegal aliens and protect American communities with the utmost professionalism,” Jackson said in a statement. “Anyone pointing the finger at law enforcement officers instead of the criminals are simply doing the bidding of criminal illegal aliens and fueling false narratives that lead to violence.”

Meanwhile, the White House eliminated the Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman, which was charged with reporting inhumane conditions at ICE detention facilities where many of immigrants are held. The office was brought back after a lawsuit and court order, though it’s meagerly staffed.

The weakening of the office comes as Trump moves to build detention sites with names that do nothing to conceal the harsh conditions inside: “Alligator Alcatraz” in the Florida Everglades, built by the state and operated in partnership with DHS, or the “Cornhusker Clink” in Nebraska.

On April 1, ICE storm troopers showed up at a birthday party in Hays County, Texas, not far from Austin, where they apprehended 47 people, including nine children. The agency’s only disclosure about the raid was that they were searching for members believed to be part of the Venezuelan transnational gang, Tren de Aragua.

Six months later and the government refuses to provide answers as the fate of the arrested.

“We’re not told why they took them, and we’re not told where they took them,” said a neighbor of the family. “By definition that’s kidnapping.”

The Texas Department of Public Safety did not respond to a request for comment.

While the Trump administration has a duty to arrest immigrants who arrived in the country by illegal means, it is failing to enforce the law in a respectable and civilized way. Bands of unmarked vehicles grabbing people off the streets in broad daylight sets a dangerous precedent and only encourages acts of further violence against innocent people. It makes the United States look like a banana republic with no respect for the law or human rights.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... tatorship/

Time and again we have seen law enforcement pushing the envelope: for example 'entrapment'. Used to be not allowed by the courts which were subsequently convinced to allow it for certain circumstances where the cops said couldn't 'get the goods' on perps by any other means. First it was the mafia, then drug dealers, nowadays anything goes. Current ICE methods will soon be used at the cop's whim soon too.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Sat Oct 25, 2025 3:07 pm

Trump Terminates Trade Talks With Canada Over Ad Referencing Reagan

Image
U.S. President Donald Trump (R). X/ @lovingpenelope2

October 24, 2025 Hour: 8:07 am

An Ontario government video using 1987 Reagan speech draws backlash from Washington.
On Thursday, U.S. President Donald Trump canceled trade negotiations with Canada following the release of a “fake” Canadian ad allegedly designed to influence a U.S. Supreme Court decision.

“Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Earlier last week, the government of Ontario released a 1987 video featuring excerpts from a national radio address titled “Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade” delivered by then-President Ronald Reagan.

“While the minute-long advert only includes excerpts from the original five-minute address, it does not alter Reagan’s words,” the BBC commented, noting that Reagan was explaining the imposition of tariffs on certain Japanese goods as an exceptional case, since he opposed any form of trade barriers.

“When someone says, ‘Let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports,’ it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes, for a short while, it works — but only for a short time,” Reagan said at the video.

“Over the long run, such trade barriers hurt every American, worker and consumer. High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars… Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industries shut down, and millions of people lose their jobs,” he added.

Although the order of several phrases from the original speech was rearranged in the Ontario video, Reagan did express his intention to lift tariffs as soon as possible “to promote the prosperity and economic development that only free trade can bring.”

The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation accused the advertisement’s creators of using Reagan’s words without permission and in a selective manner. According to Trump, the Ontario video aimed to influence current U.S. judicial decisions related to the global tariffs imposed by his administration.

Earlier on Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country would not allow unfair U.S. access to Canadian markets if trade talks fail.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/trump-te ... ng-reagan/

******

What’s “essential” to Trump’s EPA? More mercury pollution.

As thousands of EPA workers are sent home during the shutdown, the ones dismantling mercury rules for coal plants are still clocking in.
Emily Atkin
Oct 22, 2025

Image
Stacks from the Hugh L. Spurlock Generating Station in Maysville, Kentucky, a 1.3-gigawatt coal power plant. Photo by Jeff Swensen/Getty Images
The Environmental Protection Agency’s work protecting clean air and water is grinding to a halt.

As the government shutdown enters its fourth week, thousands of EPA workers are receiving notice they’ll be sent home. Furlough notices are “widespread” across the EPA, E&E News reported on Monday, “including a large percentage of staffers in EPA’s air and water offices.”

The exact number of furloughed EPA employees is about 4,000, or about 27 percent of the agency’s workforce, Politico reported. The agency would not confirm or deny that number. (Asked for details about which EPA employees have been sent home, the EPA’s press secretary refused, telling Inside Climate News it was “a ridiculous question to ask.”)

Image

More employees are likely to be sent home as the shutdown continues. The Trump administration’s latest shutdown contingency plan considers nearly 90 percent of the EPA’s workforce to be “non-essential” or “partially essential,” and therefore eligible for furlough. “Many activities will halt, including research and the publication of research results, and the issuance of new grants, contracts and permits,” the Los Angeles Times reported. “Critically, civil enforcement inspections—on-site visits to facilities to check their compliance with environmental regulations—will also cease.”

Furloughs are also just the latest blow to the EPA’s workforce. Before the shutdown, 4,000 EPA employees had already been fired or had taken a buyout. The agency’s climate offices and its scientific research arm are also in the process of being disbanded. And the bleeding is expected to continue if and when the government reopens; The Trump administration has proposed a 55 percent cut to EPA funding in its 2026 budget request.

But there is at least one group of EPA employees who the Trump administration considers “essential,” and are still on the job: the people making it legal for coal plants to release more mercury into the environment.

The detail was first reported Friday by Lisa Friedman at the New York Times. Despite the widespread stoppage of climate, environmental and public health work during the shutdown, she reported, “the workers responsible for carrying out the president’s plans for more fossil fuels and less wind and solar power are still hard at work.”

Specifically, at the EPA, Friedman reported that “employees are finalizing a plan to allow more mercury emissions from coal plants, according to two people familiar with the work underway.”

Friedman is referring to Trump’s plan to repeal the 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule. The 2024 MATS rule, implemented by the Biden administration, strengthened older pollution regulations on coal- and oil-fired power plants. In addition to placing stricter limits on mercury pollution, the 2024 rule required coal companies to install systems that continually monitor emissions. It also eliminated a loophole that allowed coal plants to exceed pollution limits when starting up.

In June, Trump’s EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced plans to repeal the strengthened mercury regulations, arguing they were created only to kill the coal industry. “The primary purpose of these Biden-Harris administration regulations was to destroy industries that didn’t align with their narrow-minded climate change zealotry,” Zeldin said in a statement.

In reality, the regulations were designed to protect kids from being poisoned. Mercury is a highly dangerous neurotoxin that causes developmental problems in infants and damages children’s brains. No amount of exposure is safe.

Once emitted by coal plants into the air, mercury then settles into waterways, contaminates fish, and lingers in ecosystems for decades. Mercury pollution from coal plants is the primary reason why tuna and swordfish are considered unsafe for pregnant and other vulnerable people to consume.

One recent study estimated that emissions from coal are costing Americans $13 billion to $26 billion per year in additional ER visits, strokes and cardiac events, and a greater prevalence and severity of childhood asthma events. That’s why the EPA has spent decades reducing mercury pollution.

But now, even with the government closed, Trump and Zeldin are racing to let coal plants release more mercury into the air. And they’re doing it for one reason: Because the coal industry asked them to.

Trump loves to talk about how he’s bringing back “clean” coal. As he infamously said in his speech to the U.N. last month, ”I have a little standing order in the White House: Never use the word coal. Only use the words: Clean, beautiful coal. Sounds much better, doesn’t it?”

But “clean” coal doesn’t exist. And even if it did, it wouldn’t describe what Trump and Zeldin are bringing back.

For the last year, coal companies have been explicitly asking Trump to make coal dirtier—and Trump has been complying. Back in March, Trump’s EPA sent a blast notification to coal companies, telling them if they wanted to be exempted from pollution requirements like the mercury standard, all they had to do was ask.

The EPA even provided an email template that coal companies could use to make their request.

Image
A New York Times article describes the process by which the Trump administration is allowing coal companies to request exemptions from pollution regulations.

Since then, Trump has personally granted temporary exemptions from the 2024 Mercury Air Toxic Standards for 68 coal plants—representing more than a third of U.S. coal-fired capacity, according to Utility Dive.

These temporary exemptions likely explain why the EPA is rushing to permanently repeal the 2024 mercury standards, even during a government shutdown. Because if those temporary exemptions are allowed to expire, coal companies will be forced to comply with strong pollution laws.

This is what it looks like when the fossil fuel industry doesn’t just lobby the government, but becomes the government. The agency designed to protect people from pollution gets turned into a customer service department for coal—even when the entire government is shut down. The shutdown itself has many moving parts, and it’s easy for stories like this to get lost in the shuffle. But the quiet dismantling of protections for children’s health is one that will leave a lasting mark.

https://heated.world/p/whats-essential- ... dium=email

******

Demolition of the White House
October 24, 5:13 PM

Image

The demolition of the East Wing of the White House, ordered by Trump, has been completed. Part of the historic building (the demolished section was over 100 years old) was torn down to make way for a ballroom. The US Congress declared that Trump had destroyed one of the cultural symbols of American democracy.

Image

Image

A concept for the future renovation of the White House.

Rumors also suggest that an underground bunker, protected from attacks and eavesdropping, may be built beneath the new "ballroom."

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10148598.html

Google Translator.

*****
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Mon Oct 27, 2025 3:10 pm

Trump’s Test in Gaza & Ukraine
October 27, 2025

Real peace demands Palestinian statehood, Ukrainian neutrality and the courage to defy the war lobby, write Jeffrey D. Sachs and Sybil Fares.

Image
President Donald Trump is presented with the Richard Nixon Architect of Peace Award on Oct. 21 during a ceremony in the Oval Office. (White House /Daniel Torok)

By Jeffrey D. Sachs and Sybil Fares
Al Jazeera

United States President Donald Trump styles himself as a peacemaker. In his rhetoric, he claims credit for his efforts to end the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Yet beneath the grandstanding lies an absence of substance, at least to date.

The problem is not Trump’s lack of effort, but his lack of proper concepts. Trump confuses “peace” with “ceasefires,” which sooner or later revert to war (typically sooner). In fact, American presidents from Lyndon Johnson onward have been subservient to the military-industrial complex, which profits from endless war. Trump is merely following in that line by avoiding a genuine resolution to the wars in Gaza and Ukraine.

Peace is not a ceasefire. Lasting peace is achieved by resolving the underlying political disputes that led to the war. This requires grappling with history, international law and political interests that fuel conflicts. Without addressing the root causes of war, ceasefires are a mere intermission between rounds of slaughter.

Trump has proposed what he calls a “peace plan” for Gaza. However, what he outlines amounts to nothing more than a ceasefire. His plan fails to address the core political issue of Palestinian statehood. A true peace plan would tie together four outcomes: the end of Israel’s genocide, Hamas’s disarmament, Palestine’s membership in the United Nations and the normalisation of diplomatic ties with Israel and Palestine throughout the world.

These foundational principles are absent from Trump’s plan, which is why no country has signed off on it despite White House insinuations to the contrary. At most, some countries have backed the “Declaration for Enduring Peace and Prosperity,” a temporising gesture.

Trump’s peace plan was presented to Arab and Muslim countries to deflect attention from the global momentum for Palestinian statehood. The U.S. plan is designed to undercut that momentum, allowing Israel to continue its de facto annexation of the West Bank and its ongoing bombardment of Gaza and restrictions of emergency relief under the ruse of security.

Israel’s ambitions are to eradicate the possibility of a Palestinian state, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made explicit at the U.N. in September. So far, Trump and his associates have simply been advancing Netanyahu’s agenda.

Image
Netanyahu addressing the U.N. General Assembly on Sept. 26. (UN Photo/Loey Felipe)

Trump’s “plan” is already unravelling, much like the Oslo Accords, the Camp David Summit, and every other “peace process” that treated Palestinian statehood as a distant aspiration rather than the solution to the conflict.

If Trump really wants to end the war — a somewhat doubtful proposition — he’d have to break with Big Tech and the rest of the military-industrial complex (recipients of vast arms contracts funded by the U.S.).

Since October 2023, the U.S. has spent $21.7 billion on military aid to Israel, much of it returning to Silicon Valley.

Trump would also have to break with his donor-in-chief, Miriam Adelson, and the Zionist lobby. In doing so, he would at least represent the American people (who support a state of Palestine) and uphold American strategic interests. The U.S. would join the overwhelming global consensus, which endorses the implementation of the two-state solution, rooted in U.N. Security Council resolutions and ICJ opinions.

Same Failure in Ukraine

The same failure of Trump’s peacemaking holds in Ukraine. Trump repeatedly claimed during the campaign that he could end the war “in 24 hours.” Yet what he has been proposing is a ceasefire, not a political solution. The war continues.

The cause of the Ukraine war is no mystery – if one looks beyond the pablum of the mainstream media. The casus belli was the push by the U.S. military-industrial complex for NATO’s endless expansion, including to Ukraine and Georgia, and the U.S.-backed coup in Kyiv in February 2014 to bring to power a pro-NATO regime, which ignited the war.

The key to peace in Ukraine, then and now, was for Ukraine to maintain its neutrality as a bridge between Russia and NATO.

In March-April 2022, when Turkiye mediated a peace agreement in the Istanbul Process, based on Ukraine’s return to neutrality, the Americans and the British pushed the Ukrainians to walk out of the talks.

Until the U.S. clearly renounces NATO’s expansion to Ukraine, there can be no sustainable peace. The only way forward is a negotiated settlement based on Ukraine’s neutrality in the context of mutual security of Russia, Ukraine, and the NATO countries.

Image
Boris Johnson, then-U.K. prime minister, left, meeting Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kiev, April 9, 2022. (Ukraine government)

Military theorist Carl von Clausewitz famously characterised war as the continuation of politics with other means. He was right. Yet it is more accurate to say that war is the failure of politics that leads to conflict.

When political problems are deferred or denied, and governments fail to negotiate over essential political issues, war too often ensues. Real peace requires the courage and capacity to engage in politics, and to face down the war profiteers.

No president since John F. Kennedy has really tried to make peace. Many close observers of Washington believe that it was Kennedy’s assassination that irrevocably put the military-industrial complex in the seat of power.

In addition, the U.S. arrogance of power already noted by J. William Fulbright in the 1960s (in reference to the misguided Vietnam War) is another culprit. Trump, like his predecessors, believes that U.S. bullying, misdirection, financial pressures, coercive sanctions and propaganda will be enough to force Putin to submit to NATO, and the Muslim world to submit to Israel’s permanent rule over Palestine.

Image
Putin disembarking at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska, on Aug. 15 for a meeting with Trump. (White House /Daniel Torok)

Trump and the rest of the Washington political establishment, beholden to the military-industrial complex, will not on their own account move beyond these ongoing delusions. Despite decades of Israeli occupation of Palestine and more than a decade of war in Ukraine (which started with the 2014 coup), the wars continue despite the ongoing attempts by the U.S. to assert its will. In the meantime, the money pours into the coffers of the war machine.

Nonetheless, there is still a glimmer of hope, since reality is a stubborn thing.

When Trump soon arrives in Budapest to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, his deeply knowledgeable and realistic host, Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, can help Trump to grasp a fundamental truth: NATO enlargement must end to bring peace to Ukraine.

Similarly, Trump’s trusted counterparts in the Islamic world — Turkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and Indonesia’s President Prabowo Subianto – can explain to Trump the utter necessity of Palestine as a U.N. member state now, as the very precondition of Hamas’s disarmament and peace, not as a vague promise for the end of history.

Trump can bring peace if he reverts to diplomacy. Yes, he would have to face down the military-industrial complex, the Zionist lobby and the warmongers, but he would have the world and the American people on his side.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/10/27/t ... a-ukraine/

Whadda joke, Trump could give a flying fuck about "the American people and the world". Are they enriching Trump personally?
End of story.

*****

About This Golden Fleet

As you all know, DJT loves gold. Golden Dome, golden Oval Office, now this ...

Image

Yes, Golden Fleet. Chester Nimitz and Elmo Zumwalt are spinning in their graves. So does Admiral Mahan and possibly even Admiral Halsey. But, strategic memetic force does not spin ... it imagines:

Image

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/10 ... fleet.html

(More, David Lynch)

******

Alexander Rogers; Crazy week of the USA and the EU

Columnist and analyst Alexander Rogers discusses a week in which the West went completely crazy. Trump promises to tear everything down within six months, and new sanctions against Russia hit the EU.
Dr Ignacy Nowopolski
Oct 27, 2025

Image

Sanctions, tokens and stolen offices: a summary of a week in which the West is its own saboteur.

I have to admit that I am no longer qualified to write current summaries of events from a given week. It’s getting more and more crazy there, so I have to educate myself in psychiatry.

Judge for yourself. Let’s start with the most aggressive patient. On Monday, Trump threatened to attack Venezuela, on Tuesday he called the Colombian president a “bandit” (and who exactly is he?), on Wednesday he imposed secondary sanctions on India and China (but the EU suffered, as usual), on Thursday he broke off all trade negotiations with Canada “because they were pursuing a false trade policy”, and on Friday he claimed that his sanctions would surely tear the Russian economy to shreds.

And when he learned that Putin had declared Russia’s economy impervious to sanctions, he replied: “We’ll see in six months.” This is something new. Before it was “in three days”, then a week, then “maybe two or three”, all kinds of ultimatums for 50 days and “until the end of the summer”. Now Trump, more experienced, says: “In six months.” He hopes that in six months, everyone will forget his previous lies (just as we haven’t forgotten Canada, Greenland and Panama!).

I wonder: if Trump launches a ground invasion of Venezuela, will the Western media scream about “unprovoked aggression”? And will the EU impose 32,000 sanctions on the US? Will they freeze American assets in European banks (they simply won’t freeze them, because there are no American assets)? Will Germany, Britain and France supply weapons to Venezuela’s democratically elected leader? Or maybe it’s about something completely different? We all know the answers to these questions.

Unlike people with liberal views, I have a good memory and I remember Trump “justifying” the presence of American troops in Syria: “I seized the oil.”

Image

Trump is against Venezuela, the EU is against toilets, and everyone is against common sense

As in Casanova:

“Russia and China have built a rational economy in which resources are allocated not to drugs and Ukrainian prostitutes, but to the development of production...”

“Witchcraft!” That is, a dictatorship! And generally unfair!


Meanwhile, the European Union has imposed another round of sanctions on Russia (the 19th package, if I’m not mistaken), even harsher than the previous ones. And it waits with hope: what if they work this time?

How could Russia cope without the toilet trade with the EU? It has only 35 of its own factories in Russia that produce them.

The United States has also imposed sanctions. Formally, they are also directed against Russia, but in reality, as usual, directed against Europe. Merz has already stated that he “expects the United States to exempt Rosneft’s German subsidiary from sanctions.” Similar statements were made by several other politicians.

Image
Friedrich Merz

First, they demand that the US impose sanctions, and then they shout: “Ouch, it hurts!”. What masochists. I’m telling you: I don’t have psychiatric qualifications to comment on something like that.

The Europeans (this time the Dutch) took another step this week. As part of the hostile takeover, they took over the office of the “Nexperia” company, located on their territory, from the China. They have taken over an office, two desks and three plastic chairs and are waiting for the microchips to start appearing. The problem is that the production plant is located in a place with a beautiful European name Guangdong. For some reason, they stopped supplying chips from there.

The British “The Telegraph” publishes articles like: “The common people are rebelling, milord”, and Germany has sent a diplomatic note to Beijing demanding the resumption of chip supplies. “How dare you, subhumans, not provide us with chips from our factory that we stole from you?!”.

By the way, Volkswagen is in crisis. Not only does it have more than 12 billion euros in debt, but it also doesn’t even have chips to install in its cars. As a result, production is frozen and the management is frantically looking for departments to sell. This applies not only to Volkswagen, but to the entire group (12 companies, including Audi, Porsche, Škoda, SEAT, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Ducati, as well as truck and bus manufacturers Scania, MAN and Navistar).

Deutschland müss capituliren, mein Führer! Nohmal!

https://drignacynowopolski.substack.com ... eek-of-the

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:23 pm

Image
Donald Trump speaking at CPAC 2011 in Washington, D.C (Wikimedia Commons/ Photo by Gage Skidmore from Peoria, AZ, United States of America)

In Trump’s new Confederacy, slavery wasn’t sin
Originally published: The Black Press USA on October 2025 by Stacy M. Brown (more by The Black Press USA) (Posted Oct 28, 2025)

In Donald Trump’s America, they are no longer whispering their love for slavery; they are preaching it from the pulpit. Far-right Christian nationalist Joshua Haymes, a self-anointed prophet of white supremacy, declared in a recent video that slavery “is not inherently evil,” demanding that every Christian “affirm and defend” the right to own another human being. His words vividly remind many of the crack of the overseer’s whip, the theology of the lash, and the perverted gospel that baptized centuries of Black pain in the name of God. Haymes, who hosts a podcast with Pastor Brooks Potteiger of Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship near Nashville, is no internet outcast shouting into the void. The church aligns with Douglas Wilson, the father of modern Christian nationalism, and counts Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth among its members. This isn’t fringe, it’s the foundation of a rising white Christian theocracy that sees slavery as “biblically justified” and domination as divine will.

In his rant, Haymes insisted, “The institution of slavery is not inherently evil. It is not inherently evil to own another human being.” He demanded that “every Christian affirm what I just said,” claiming America’s Founding Fathers weren’t “living in grave sin” for enslaving people. He called it “chronological snobbery” to condemn them. That is how far they have sunk, defending the whip as righteousness, calling the chains holy. This ideology is not confined to Tennessee pews or online podcasts. It has a home in Washington, in the halls of power, where Trump and his disciples are rewriting history—literally—by government order. As previously reported, the Trump administration has directed the National Park Service and the Smithsonian Institution to remove exhibits that “disparage” America’s founders by mentioning slavery. They’ve ordered the deletion of a photo of a man’s scourged back. Yes, the scarred flesh of a freed Black man who endured the lash, because it made America “look bad.”

At Fort Pulaski in Georgia, the order came down to strip away the image that defined the brutality of the Civil War era. The image that showed what the Confederacy did to the human body has now been banned by the new Confederates in suits. Trump called the Smithsonian “OUT OF CONTROL” for “talking about how horrible slavery was,” and promised to send lawyers to “go through the museums” and cleanse the content. “This country cannot be WOKE,” he declared. Translation: America cannot be honest. At historic sites like the President’s House in Philadelphia, where George Washington enslaved nine men and women and rotated them out of state to avoid Pennsylvania’s gradual emancipation law, Trump’s order has demanded that panels describing those crimes be “reviewed” or removed. A panel describing Washington’s actions as “profoundly disturbing” has been flagged for revision. Another that said slavery “mocked the nation’s pretense to liberty” is on the chopping block. They want to make the father of the country look clean again by erasing the blood on his hands. “This is truth; it’s American history,” said retired Philadelphia attorney Michelle Flamer, who helped create the original exhibit.

There’s good and there’s bad, and it’s just like life itself.

But Trump’s America wants only the “good.” A fantasy built on denial. The administration’s censorship is a campaign of amnesia, designed to blind a generation to the crimes that built this nation. Historian Michael Coard, who helped lead the effort to memorialize the enslaved at the President’s House, said, “If George Washington got all that attention, then we need to get some attention now.” Trump’s order calls this honesty “unpatriotic.” His followers call it “anti-American.” What it really turns out to be is fear. Fear of the truth, fear of the record, fear of the descendants of the enslaved demanding to be seen and heard. And this is not happening in isolation. Across the far-right ecosystem, white Christian nationalists are rising to defend the indefensible. Haymes and his co-conspirators are not simply talking about theology; they are providing moral cover for tyranny. They are laying the groundwork for a new Confederacy, one that cloaks its racism in scripture and its hatred in hymns. Even as the administration censors history, young Republicans in private Telegram chats have been caught calling Black people “monkeys” and “watermelon people,” joking about gas chambers, and celebrating rape and torture as political tactics. The Kansas Young Republicans’ vice chair used the N-word repeatedly. Leaders of the New York State Young Republicans laughed about “epic rape” and fantasized about “physiological torture.” This is not political discourse; it is the language of fascism.

When the President of the United States orders museums to stop teaching the truth, when his followers call slavery “biblical,” and when young white conservatives talk about gas chambers like punchlines, it is not a coincidence. It is a movement, a coordinated, cultural counterrevolution against truth, equality, and the very notion of freedom for Black people. The evidence is clear that this government is engaged in historical sterilization. It is erasing the crimes of slavery, suppressing the truth of genocide, and criminalizing those who dare to remember. This is the same spirit that banned books in the Jim Crow South, that burned Black schools in the Reconstruction era, and that murdered truth-tellers from Mississippi to Minnesota.They want to make America forget so they can do it again. But history has a way of fighting back. The scars remain. The names remain. Oney Judge, Hercules, and the countless others who refused to stay in chains, even when the first president of this country was their master. Their stories are our inheritance, our resistance, our unbreakable testament. If Trump and his prophets of whiteness believe they can sanitize the past, they underestimate the people who live its consequences. They forget that truth has a pulse, and that it beats strongest in the descendants of the enslaved. As Alan Spears of the National Parks Conservation Association said, “We can handle the truth.” And most believe America will. Because the truth is not Trump and his new Confederacy to rewrite. It was written in blood, and it will be remembered in fire.

https://mronline.org/2025/10/28/in-trum ... wasnt-sin/

*****

Coffee Break: Follow the Money Under Trump’s East Wing Ballroom and Behind Dem Progressive Campaigns
Posted on October 27, 2025 by Nat Wilson Turner

Follow the money has been a rule of thumb for understanding American politics since the Watergate scandals of the 1970s, but in the Trump 2.0 era it should be expanded to include following the kinetic power as well.

Let’s dive right in and start with the Trump Family, for, as we’ve been reminded by John Helmer, Trump is primarily motivated by personal (and familial) profit.

Follow the Money With Drones: The Trump Family Business

Image

In a way, Trump’s devotion to being the pater familias of a political grift dynasty is touching. Along with his sense of humor, and taste for junk food, it’s one of his more relatable traits.

The Financial Times has the latest on Donald Trump, Jr.’s latest score, who knew he was a drone builder?

A little-known drone company backed by Donald Trump Jr has won its largest contract from the Pentagon, as the US government expands its procurement of the drones.

Florida-based Unusual Machines, in which Trump Jr has held a $4mn stake, said the US army had contracted it to manufacture 3,500 drone motors, alongside various other drone parts.

The company added the army indicated it planned to order an additional 20,000 components from Unusual Machines next year.

Allan Evans, the company’s chief executive, said he believed it was the largest order for Unusual Machines parts from the US government to date, but declined to disclose the value of the contract.

Shares in Unusual Machines jumped as much as 13 per cent on Friday.

Unusual Machines brought Trump Jr on as an adviser in November 2024. The Financial Times earlier this year found shares in the company almost tripled in price in the weeks leading up to its disclosure of the move.

Soon after Trump Jr came on board, Unusual Machines disclosed he owned 331,580 shares, which would currently be worth roughly $4mn.

Trump Jr is not required to disclose whether he has since sold any of his stake, but Evans earlier this year said the president’s son had continued to invest in recent fundraising rounds.

Unusual Machines has struck deals with other US defence suppliers in recent months, inking a $12.8mn agreement with Strategic Logix in September and a $1.6mn deal with an unnamed domestic defence drone maker in August.

The company, which is working on manufacturing more of its components in the US, has also been harmed by Trump tariffs.
In the first quarter of the year, it said the levies contributed to a $3.3mn operating loss. Unusual Machines has warned the cost of sourcing components from countries other than China could impact profits.

Follow the Money to Iowa Where Trickle Down Is Soaking Trump’s Constituents

“Since siding with Barack Obama twice, Iowa has become a stronghold for Mr. Trump. Yet perhaps no state has struggled more with his economic policies. During the first quarter of 2025, Iowa’s GDP dropped by 6.1 percent, more than any other state aside from neighboring Nebraska.” Show more

Unfortunately, there’s no indication that Trump’s interests expand enough to include his most loyal rural voters. In his defense, it’s completely unclear that he or his trade team understand the havoc they’ve wrought on American agriculture.

Let’s follow the money to Iowa.

Per The New York Times

When President Trump announced a $20 billion bailout for Argentina this month, Larry Ory, 86, a farmer in Earlham, Iowa, could hardly believe it, especially after boatloads of Argentine soybeans began shipping to China, a once-critical customer for Mr. Ory’s family.

For Iowans, losing China’s soybean market in the president’s trade war was only one of many economic shocks that have hit the state since the start of Mr. Trump’s second term.

Since siding with Barack Obama twice, Iowa has become a stronghold for Mr. Trump. Yet perhaps no state has struggled more with his economic policies. During the first quarter of 2025, Iowa’s gross domestic product dropped by 6.1 percent, more than any other state aside from neighboring Nebraska.

Manufacturing, which drives 17 percent of Iowa’s economic output, has been hit with higher production costs in part because of steep tariffs on inputs like aluminum and steel. Meatpacking plants, which help make Iowa the nation’s leading pork producer, rely heavily on foreign-born workers, hundreds of thousands of whom saw their legal status stripped away by the president. Mr. Trump’s war on renewable energy also threatens the wind industry that produces more than half of Iowa’s electricity.

For now, times are tough. Iowa is the country’s largest producer of corn and second-largest producer of soybeans. America exports as much as half its soybeans, and the vast majority of that had gone to China — $12.6 billion worth last year.

But this year, China stopped purchasing soybeans from the United States to retaliate against Mr. Trump’s tariffs.

American producers have spent decades working with people in China on how to use soy in animal feed, part of an effort to build up that growing market. Mr. Leeds said he has traveled to the country 25 times and used dollars paid by Iowa farmers to foster strong bonds with Chinese importers.


Iowa’s large beef industry then recoiled after Mr. Trump suggested he would try to lower the cost of beef by importing more from Argentina.

As he deals with those higher prices, Aaron Lehman, a fifth-generation farmer in rural Polk County, said he will continue to use his more than 25-year-old, worn combine. A machine with greater power and a more sophisticated GPS system would cost upward of $100,000 used and more than $250,000 new, he said.

Follow the Money: Who’s Paying the Troops?

While Trump’s policies may be stressing the economy of key supporter states, the government shut down may be interfering with his plans, or at least Secretary of State/National Security advisor “Little” Marco Rubio.

As the Armchair Warlord reminds us on Twitter, failing to pay troops has been an imperial achilles heel through the ages.

I feel like the fact that the US military is about to miss a paycheck and we're still moving to attack Venezuela isn't getting enough press.

It's a pretty basic military principle dating back to antiquity that you make sure your troops are paid before you start a campaign.


Into the breach steps Trump Donor Timothy Mellon, per the NY Times:

Timothy Mellon, a reclusive billionaire and a major financial backer of President Trump, is the anonymous private donor who gave $130 million to the U.S. government to help pay troops during the shutdown, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Shortly after departing Washington on Friday, Mr. Trump again declined to identify Mr. Mellon while talking to reporters aboard Air Force One. He only said the individual was “a great American citizen” and a “substantial man.”

“He doesn’t want publicity,” Mr. Trump said as he headed to Malaysia. “He prefer that his name not be mentioned which is pretty unusual in the world I come from, and in the world of politics, you want your name mentioned.”

It remains unclear how far the donation will go toward covering the salaries of the more than 1.3 million troops who make up the active-duty military. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the Trump administration’s 2025 budget requested about $600 billion in total military compensation. A $130 million donation would equal about $100 a service member.

Mr. Mellon, a wealthy banking heir and railroad magnate, is a longtime backer of Mr. Trump and gave tens of millions of dollars to groups supporting the president’s campaign. Last year, he made a $50 million donation to a super PAC supporting Mr. Trump, which was one of the largest single contributions ever disclosed.

A grandson of former Treasury Secretary Andrew W. Mellon, Mr. Mellon was not a prominent Republican donor until Mr. Trump was elected. But in recent years, he has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into supporting Mr. Trump and the Republican Party.

The Daily Beast goes into the source of Mr. Mellon’s hard-earned hundreds of millions:

Mellon’s grandfather was the longtime Treasury Secretary Andrew W. Mellon, who served from 1921 to 1932 under presidents Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover. Andrew was the son of Thomas Mellon, who founded Mellon Bank, which made his family filthy rich for generations.

The donor’s dad, Paul Mellon, was a breeder of thoroughbred racehorses who benefited from the family’s banking riches. By 1957, when Fortune published its first list of the wealthiest Americans, it estimated that Paul Mellon, his sister, and his two cousins were among the eight wealthiest people in the United States.

Timothy Mellon’s cousin, Matthew Mellon, was an early crypto investor who struggled with drug addiction. He died in Mexico in 2018, aged 54, just as he was about to check himself into rehab in Mexico. He was divorced from Jimmy Choo co-founder Tamara Mellon, who once wrote that she was “snorting her way through alpine ranges of cocaine” during her marriage to the Mellon heir.

“He’s a great gentleman,” Trump said of Timothy Mellon, who appears to be more clean-cut than his younger cousin. “He’s a great patriot. He’s obviously a very substantial man, and he contributed $130 million toward the military in order to make up any difference. So he wanted to see the military get paid.”

The same piece points out that the $130 million won’t go far to cover the U.S. military payroll: it averages out to about $100/soldier.

Armchair Warlord piles on to that point:

People keep on saying this will keep troops from missing a paycheck next Friday. The DoD payroll in 2024 was approximately $192 billion dollars, or about $8 billion per bimonthly payday.

This is less than 2% of what's required to make payroll on October 31st.


Follow the Money Down the Jeffrey Epstein Conspiracy Path

Mellon’s famous last name and the 2025 zeitgeist inevitably led social media sleuths down the rabbit hole Epstein allegations, citing an October lawsuit against the Bank of New York (and Bank of America) by another unnamed alleged Epstein victim.

The Wall Street Journal has background on that suit:

The suit against BNY claims that since at least 2006 the bank had a relationship with MC2, a modeling agency that Epstein and modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel created. The suit claims that the men used funds from the bank to facilitate Epstein’s sex trafficking. Brunel, who was arrested in 2020 on sex-trafficking charges, died in jail in 2022.

The suits were brought by lawyers, including Brad Edwards and David Boies, who have represented many of Epstein’s victims and previously filed similar class actions against JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank in 2022.

“The other banks responsible for allowing Epstein’s trafficking should have contacted us during the previous litigation to do the right thing for these victims,” Edwards said. “It is sad that only through lawsuits and Congress are we able to bring justice to this obvious problem.”

JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank have said they regret their relationships with Epstein and settled the suits in 2023, without admitting wrongdoing. JPMorgan agreed to pay $290 million to victims and Deutsche Bank agreed to pay $75 million.
Epstein’s estate recently turned over to Congress a list of more than 20 banks that held accounts for Epstein and entities related to him, and several had accounts with Epstein in his later years, the Journal has reported.

Right up front, let me quote The Economic Times (India) on the matter so that it’s clear I’m not among those making these claims and am merely reporting on them to show the public mood online:

After the NYT report, several posts online began suggesting that Mellon may have been linked to Jeffrey Epstein, due to a lawsuit filed against the Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon). The lawsuit, filed on October 16, accuses the bank of facilitating financial transactions linked to Epstein’s operations. However, there is no verified evidence showing any connection between Timothy Mellon and Epstein.

BNY Mellon has rejected the allegations and described the lawsuit as baseless. A company spokesperson said, “The claims in the lawsuit are meritless, and we will vigorously defend against it.”

Confusion about the Mellon name has contributed to false links. BNY Mellon was formed after a merger between Mellon Financial and the Bank of New York in 2007. After the merger, the Mellon family did not retain ownership or control in the company. The firm became a publicly traded corporation, and institutional investors, including Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street, hold the major shares.

So case closed, right? Seems like that’s not enough to turn off the X.com rumor mill:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G4M_gf4WEAA ... name=small

Follow the Money to the Power Under the East Wing Ballroom

There’s been a fair amount of MSM handwringing over Trump’s new ballroom which is being built over the rubble of the East Wing of the White House. Most of it irrelevant boo hoo about the brilliant architecture of the Roosevelt era.

CNN accidentally mentions something far more important going on underground in the demolition zone:

Initially a carriage entrance during the term of President Theodore Roosevelt in 1902, it became the modern East Wing as millions of tourists see it each year — or did — under his distant cousin, President Franklin Roosevelt some 40 years later. The build-out was a practical matter: With World War II raging, an emergency underground bunker had been constructed on the spot and needed the building to hide it.

The East Wing was not totally separated from more dire business. The bunker below — officially called the Presidential Emergency Operations Center — is where Vice President Dick Cheney went during the 9/11 attacks, and where Trump was taken during protests in his first term. President George W. Bush used the East Wing to practice his State of the Union address in 2004.

Carlyn Beccia has more on Medium:

According to the National Capital Planning Commission, no full architectural plans have been submitted — no elevations, no blueprints, no site approvals.

Yet demolition has begun. The White House maintains that “preparatory work” doesn’t require review. This neat little loophole somehow allows an entire wing of the most protected building in America to be erased without oversight.

Unofficially, it sits on top of the country’s most secure hideout — The Presidential Emergency Operations Center, or PEOC. The US government built the bunker during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration after Pearl Harbor scared the hell out of everyone in Washington.

Today, most White House officials refer to it as “the shelter” or PEOC — pronounced Pee-ock, (as in the sound the Founding Fathers would make if they saw Trump’s renovation). It’s the kind of 5-story bunker that was meant to survive a direct hit — reinforced concrete, steel doors, filtered air, the whole “end of the world but make it dignified” package.

…FDR used it as a communications hub; Truman and Eisenhower beefed it up during the Cold War; Dick Cheney was ushered into its lair during the 9/11 attacks. And every president since has at least had a look around, just in case democracy ever needed to hide under the table.

After 9/11, the Bush administration realized the White House’s emergency bunker was about as cutting-edge as a rotary phone. Congress quietly funded a massive upgrade, and by 2010, the Obama team was digging under the North Lawn. The official story? “Air-conditioning and mechanical upgrades.”

…By 2018…: a new, high-tech command bunker was born, stocked with the latest communications systems, computers, its own air supply, food supply, and enough filtration gear to outlast the apocalypse in style.

…The PEOC wasn’t just a bunker; over the decades, it’s rumored to have sprawled into a labyrinth of tunnels connecting to the Treasury, the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, and possibly even Lafayette Park. Washington’s soil is laced with secrecy — a place where the Metro can’t dig without bumping into classified concrete.

You don’t just slap a ballroom on top of that without “reconfiguring” something underneath. Which is why this new project, wrapped in secrecy and gold leaf, should have Americans asking the same question: Is Trump building a bigger ballroom or a bigger bunker?

All of this sheds new light on what happens when we follow the money to Trump’s alleged “ballroom” donors.

The Washington Post has more about that, including the full list of donors:

But ethics experts and Democrats say they are turning to a question related to the next phase of the project: whether the donors behind the planned $300 million ballroom that will replace the demolished annex will receive any benefits in return.

Tech companies and defense contractors such as Google, Lockheed Martin and Microsoft, as well as wealthy individuals such as longtime GOP donors Stephen A. Schwarzman and Isaac “Ike” Perlmutter, have collectively covered the cost for Trump’s project, according to a list the White House released Thursday.

Many of the firms and individuals have business before the administration, such as seeking future federal contracts or eyeing potential acquisitions.

Meredith O’Rourke, a longtime fundraiser for Trump, is coordinating the donations, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the efforts. O’Rourke referred questions about her role to the White House, which did not immediately respond.

The donations, which are tax-deductible, are being managed by the Trust for the National Mall, a nonprofit that helps manage federal projects. Donors to Trump’s ballroom project have been told to expect some form of recognition, such as the placement of etchings of their names in the ballroom, according to the people who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Trump said this week he has raised $350 million for his long-desired ballroom, which will be built on the site previously occupied by the East Wing, the longtime home to a visitor’s entrance to the White House. The annex also provided office space for the first lady and included other features such as a movie theater. The president, who did not specify what he would do with the extra $50 million for the project, said that he has donated “millions of dollars” himself for the beautification of the White House grounds and pledged to personally cover any shortfall in funding for construction of the ballroom if costs continued to rise.

Follow the money and it leads to the power, more often than not.

Follow the Money to the GOP Congressional Split

I’m pushing my follow the money metaphor just to please Google who loves to see “key phrases” repeated ad nauseam, so my human readers will have to forgive me.

But I wanted to cover this little swerve in the politics of the U.S. government shutdown fight.

It’s not just your usual GOP vs. Democrats split. Hapless MAGA Speaker of the House is Mike Johnson using the shutdown to control the dissident GOP house caucus according to The New York Times:

Speaker Mike Johnson’s decision to put the House on an indefinite hiatus that is now stretching into its second month while the government is shut down is the latest in a series of moves he has made that have diminished the role of Congress and shrunken the speakership at a critical moment.

It’s an approach born of political expedience that could have far-reaching consequences for an institution that has already ceded much of its power to President Trump. And Mr. Johnson, who without the president’s backing wields little influence over his own members, has chosen to make himself subservient to Mr. Trump, a break with many speakers of the past who sought in their own ways to act more as a governing partner with the president than as his underling.

His strategy of indefinite hiatus means that Mr. Johnson has not engaged in the typical political theater that speakers often employ during shutdown fights to jam the party out of power: scheduling tricky votes on bills to reopen parks or pay certain categories of federal workers, like agents for Immigration and Customs Enforcement or Customs and Border Protection.

Democrats had been bracing for him to do so. But instead, he has spent much of the shutdown appearing daily at news conferences at the Capitol, hammering them for refusing to fund the government and making the case that Republicans need not negotiate. He is insistent that the House has nothing to do but wait for the stalemate to end. And he defends a growing list of extreme moves by Mr. Trump.

The absenteeism, people around Mr. Johnson said, is a strategic calculation that the best way to keep his unruly rank and file in line is to place them on an extended leave.

Former Speaker Newt Gingrich, who often serves as a sounding board for Mr. Johnson, said in an interview that if the House were in session, “other issues will begin to clutter this up, and there is some small danger that some Republicans might begin to have a mixed message on the shutdown.”

In fact, such dissonance has already begun bubbling up even with everyone working remotely. The divide among Republicans over whether to extend expiring health insurance subsidies — Democrats’ central demand in the shutdown fight — has highlighted a political vulnerability for the party.

It has all created a strange dynamic on Capitol Hill: Mr. Johnson appears to be using the considerable power of the speakership to render the House irrelevant.

This reinforces the arguments of those (like me) who claim the U.S. is in a post-Constitutional order (also see here).

(More at link, Dems)

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/10 ... unker.html.

******

Melania’s lawyers lead both the Trumps towards the abyss over Epstein case

Martin Jay

October 28, 2025

Any legal team advising the Trumps that a defamation case is a winner is either monstrously incompetent or taking them for a ride.

The Epstein case continues to unravel at an alarming pace following the publication of Virginia Giuffre’s scandalous expose ‘Nobody’s Girl’. In the UK, the royal, formerly known as Prince Andrew has had to give up his titles as more sordid details emerge of just how close he and his wife Sarah Fergusson were to the disgraced financier. Yet it is in the U.S. where Donald Trump is having real problems with this lurid saga as social media timelines fill up, it would seem, with photos of him and young girls in their teens. And then there are the cases where hush money was alleged to have been paid out by the U.S. president to families to keep quiet about the nature of such relations.

The real problem Trump has though is the tactic chosen by his wife.

Melania Trump has reacted quite strongly and without caution about claims made these days quite broadly by a number of pundits, that she was not only close to Epstein, but it was the former disgraced financier who introduced her to Trump, who, together helped her with her failed modelling career while fixing her immigration status in the U.S. at that time.

While being billionaires is useful in legal cases as it allows you to hire the best lawyers in the country, what it doesn’t do is give you perspective or valuable prescience about any outcomes which might hit you in the face, what Americans call ‘blowback’ (the recoil of a firearm held in the hand). Amazingly, what Melania’s lawyers have not warned her of is the pain of a defamation case when it reaches court and just how far that blowback can harm the accuser, or ‘claimant’. The point about the case arriving at a court date and being heard is important as most defamation lawyers work on the basis that early threats presented to the ‘defendants’ are usually enough to get a suitable settlement.

When Melania Trump’s lawyers threatened Hunter Biden via the press that they would sue him it made good headlines. But it didn’t make good sense. I argued in an earlier piece that it would make no sense whatsoever to sue Hunter Biden over his own allegations that it was Epstein who introduced Melania to Trump as the kind of money that the Bidens have would manufacture a case in that same courtroom which would allow two key things to happen. One, that Melania would have to answer questions in front of a jury which would probe into her personal life at that specific time, perhaps even about her husband and the validity of their marriage. And secondly, that all of these tawdry details could be reported by journalists who would be able to skirt normal defamation laws through a legal loophole called ‘Absolute Privilege’.

Any legal team advising the Trumps that a defamation case is a winner is either monstrously incompetent or taking them for a ride.

The very area which they are both trying to avoid – events surrounding their introduction and the details of those ‘parties’, not to mention how close both of them were to Epstein – is where their own red in tooth and claw determination to hit out at the accusers, is leading them to. Like moths committing suicide on the flame, it is as though the Trumps cannot help themselves.

Melania’s public image as first lady will be destroyed if any more meat can be put on the bone of this idea that Melania was a struggling model from a poor family, with very low morals and high ambitions who was attracted to Epstein who could find her a millionaire to marry just to pull her out of the gutter and give her the bling life she craved. She of course wants to avoid this altogether and probably her husband has thought about the political implications of Wolff’s lawyers establishing that she was working in the U.S. illegally.

But just how close was she to Epstein? What did their relationship entail?

All of this could have been kept buried if it were not for the stunning foibles and insecurities of the Trumps, assisted by Melania’s lawyers who have led her down a dark alley.

With Hunter Biden, it would seem she dodged a bullet as her threats made via the press were quietly retracted. And while it is true that Melania’s lawyers have had some success in gagging some individuals and even one media outlet when they originally presented the idea that Epstein’s relationship with Melania was how she was introduced to Trump, there are some, who you don’t – can’t – pick fights with.

It is with a Jewish New York writer where she will fall on her sword. Michael Wolff was surprised recently to receive a threat from her lawyers that he would face a 1bn dollar lawsuit if he didn’t retract his claims about the relationship between Melania and Epstein. An interview with the Daily Beast, where he made such claims has since been retracted but similar claims were made in his most recent book about the Trumps (he has written four to date).

Melania’s lawyers could not have guessed what Wolff would do next, but will surely regret it for the rest of their professional lives. Wolff, pushed into a corner, calculated he had much more to gain by launching an expensive counter case, which allows him to call both the Trumps as witness on oath, questioned about their relationship with Epstein. He claims in his defence that the Trumps have been destroying free speech in the U.S. and Americans’ first amendment rights. The case is unprecedented and will eclipse all other scandals in recent U.S. history if it gets to court and the author doesn’t suffer the fate of an extraordinary road accident or an untimely suicide which just so happens to have a botched autopsy.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2025/ ... tein-case/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14788
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Donald Trump, Avatar of his Class, Capitalism & the Decline and Fall of Bourgeois Democracy

Post by blindpig » Wed Oct 29, 2025 2:31 pm

THE THREE STAGES OF TRUMP WAR BEGIN WITH THE FIFTH COLUMN

Image

By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with

For every one of President Donald Trump’s eight, nine or ten peacemaking moves, as he counts them, there has been a warmaking move. The first series are turning into propaganda fakes; the second series are turning into political and military failures.

Listen to the new podcast with Nima Alkhorshid as we spell out this three-stage strategy from the coast of Venezuela to the shores of Lake Ontario, Canada, to the battlefield of the Ukraine and the battlements of the Kremlin Wall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrYzszXZXVQ

The first stage is the Trump threat which combines his “kill them dead” talk with attacks on key economic sectors; for enemy states these are called sanctions; tariffs for neutral and allied states. This combination is planned to trigger internal domestic surrender, led by Fifth Column politicians, business constituencies, and elements of government and the security services which have been cultivated by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the State Department, and the Pentagon for years. The Fifth Column in each target state must be mobilized first – covertly as Israel’s Mossad was planning inside Iran before the June war; publicly as the CIA has been acting inside Venezuela. The weakest states, those penetrated for the longest time – for example, The Netherlands, Australia, Britain, Germany, Greece — fall to Trump at this stage because the Fifth Column is already in power there.

The second stage is negotiations. At the targets for regime change, these are aimed by the Washington regime to split public opinion, sharpen political contradictions, and intensify fear for the future where domestic voter and military resistance to Trump’s warmaking have proved stronger than the Washington calculation. Russia, Iran, Democratic Republic of North Korea, Venezuela, India and China are examples. In each case, Trump has conducted probes for vulnerability and weakness employing back-channel bribery schemes, specially designated presidential emissaries, diplomatic table talks with agenda papers and multi-point formulae. Military displays called exercises, freedom of navigation sail pasts and port calls, and arms sale talks run in parallel.

By the third stage, Trump and his associates in Washington and their collaborators from Tel Aviv to London, Brussels, Berlin and Ottawa, have been blocked; their first and second-stage moves neutralized by countermoves; their inducements spurned; their envoys sent packing; the capitulation term sheets torn up. The Trump forces now face the prospect that in one target state after another, the methods of effective resistance may spread and escalate to the point that Trump himself faces defeat on the stage he himself has set.

At this point, Trump must either launch a display of firepower he believes his target cannot match or defend – “obliteration” he called his bombing attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities in June. Or else he must retreat, covering the rout with smokescreens he calls ceasefires, boards of peace, and bribery projects with names like the Gaza Riviera, Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP), and the Trump Turnberry British Open.

So how do third-stage Trump wars end? They don’t. They resume at the first and second stages. Acknowledging this, how do the Russian General Staff and the Kremlin agree on how the war in the Ukraine will end?

A source in a position to know says: “The rate of east-to-west Ukrainian migration will accelerate and there will be disintegration of the frontline with a breakthrough on any one of the critical axes that will undermine the entire Ukrainian defence east of the Dnieper. Ouster of [Vladimir] Zelensky and [Andrei] Yermak will follow when the Ukrainian commanders cannot order their forces to continue fighting, holding their ground. There will be Russian satisfaction with the new regional lines and the depth of the demilitarized zone westward to Kiev. Of course, Banderite terrorism will continue, but so will the electric war strikes, as well as assassinations from the Russian side in reply. The rump Ukraine will be dysfunctional to the point where day-to-day survival will trump warfighting in terms of allocation of resources.”

That’s small “t” trump meaning defeat. “There’s no need for the Russians to declare that they are done fighting – the situation speaks for itself. The declaration that matters is that the winner is confident the opponent will never get up again.”

A second Moscow source in a position to know says: “There has been no real breakdown in talks with the US. In the back channel the Americans have said ‘we are not going to win your four regions for you.’ There is general understanding, however, that the four [regions] will be won, leaving four points to be agreed: all of the Ukraine will be a DMZ; no NATO bases, advisors, troops; a ceasefire to be monitored by neutral units along the contact line; a Russia-US treaty to be negotiated by Putin and the president to be elected in 2028. For the time being, Trump is mocking Putin over his slowness to complete the takeover of the four regions. There are no missile game-changers – no Tomahawk from the American side, no Oreshnik from the Russian side. Until next spring we will be accumulating the materiel and manpower to finish off, softening them up to the point where the final blows will be decisive.”

Backgrounder-1 – the battlefield situation, encirclement in the east, cutoff from the west, the Burevestnik Moment.
In his remarks at the joint command post on Sunday, President Putin told General Valery Gerasimov and other group commanders: “Now about the recent military exercise. I would ask the Chief of the General Staff to report on one more event that I briefly mentioned in my opening remarks – namely, the test of the Burevestnik [tagged Skyfall by NATO] nuclear-powered unlimited-range cruise missile. I have received a report from the industry and I am aware of the assessments made by the Ministry of Defense – this is indeed a unique weapon that no other country possesses.”

“I clearly remember that when we announced the development of this weapon, even very high-level, top-class specialists told me the goal was worthy and respectable but unattainable in the near historical perspective. Once again, that was the view of those high-class experts. And now the decisive tests have been completed. Obviously, substantial work has to be done in order to place this weapon on combat duty, and all regulations must be completed. Nevertheless, as I understand it, the key objectives have been achieved, and I would like to hear the opinion of the Chief of the General Staff.”

“Valery Gerasimov: Comrade Supreme Commander-in-Chief, such a test was conducted on October 21. Unlike previous trials, this one featured a many-hour flight, with the missile covering 14,000 kilometres – and that is not the limit. Vladimir Putin: It is nuclear-powered, right? Valery Gerasimov: It is indeed. It uses nuclear propulsion. Burevestnik’s technical characteristics generally allow for its use with assured accuracy against highly protected targets at any range. During the flight, the missile completed all prescribed vertical and horizontal manoeuvres, showcasing a high capability to evade missile-defence and air-defence systems. Vladimir Putin: And how long was it in the air? Valery Gerasimov: About 15 hours. Vladimir Putin: And that is not the limit? Valery Gerasimov: No, it is not.”

Image
Source: https://en.sputniknews.africa/20251027/1079925530.html For the US and NATO analyses of the Burevestnik missile, click to read. A Norwegian military analysis of the most recent test firing detected and reported by the US and NATO can be read here. The Burevestnik is the fourth of the new strategic nuclear-capable weapons systems identified by President Putin in his address to the Federal Assembly on February 29, 2024; the others identified then were Sarmat, Poseidon, and Avangard. Putin said then that their deployment was linked to the revival of strategic arms limitation talks with the US: “Russia is ready for dialogue with the United States on issues of strategic stability. However, it is important to clarify that in this case we are dealing with a state whose ruling circles are taking openly hostile actions towards us. So, they seriously intend to discuss strategic security issues with us while simultaneously trying to inflict strategic defeat on Russia on the battlefield, as they themselves say.” The Oreshnik is the fifth nuclear-capable weapon to be launched, though it is of more limited range; the demonstration strike came on November 21, 2024; Putin reported the operational plan as limited to the Ukraine battlefield in a special speech on that day.

In the command post briefing on Sunday, Putin referred again to the prospect of new strategic arms limitation negotiations with Trump. “We will need to determine which class of weapons this new system [Burevestnik] belongs to, identify possible modes of employment, and begin preparing the infrastructure to base it in our Armed Forces. Valery Gerasimov: Affirmative. Vladimir Putin: Now, regarding the enemy encircled in the regions you reported on: without doubt, the enemy will try to unblock its groupings both from outside and from within – both directly and by actions in nearby areas to create conditions for unblocking. For that reason, I arrived here – namely, to hear the assessments of the group commanders on how you are planning, given the current developments, to organise the upcoming combat activities of the units entrusted to you.”

Twenty-four hours later, Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, undercut whatever intention Putin had in his Burevestnik disclosure to expose US reluctance to commence the new START talks for which Putin has already announced an extension of time to 2027. According to Peskov, “there is nothing here that could or should further strain relations between Moscow and Washington, especially since they are already at a minimum. So far, only the first tentative steps have been taken to bring these relations out of their previous state of stagnation.”

Peskov appeared to be endorsing Trump’s dismissal of the Burevestnik. Asked if the Burevestnik was Putin “saber-rattling”, Trump said: “They know we have a nuclear submarine, the greatest in the world, right off their shores. So I mean, it doesn’t have to go 8,000 miles. And they’re not playing games with us. We’re not playing games with them either. We test missiles all the time. But you know, we do have a submarine, a nuclear submarine. We don’t need to go 8,000 miles. And I don’t think it’s an appropriate thing to Putin — for Putin to be saying either, by the way. You ought to get the war ended. A war that should have taken one week is now in its soon, fourth year. That’s what you ought to do instead of testing missiles.”

Image
Source: https://tass.com/politics/2035499

Peskov has not responded to the Trump statement apparently encouraging Putin to finish off the Ukraine war more swiftly.

Backgrounder-2 – impact of Trump’s oil trade sanctions against Rosneft, LUKoil, Indian, Chinese and Turkish buyers.
Moscow sources engaged in the oil and other commodity trades said they expect that officially, “the Indians and Chinese will make their deals with the US and de-link from Russian oil. India and China will not buy Russian oil direct or from or through subsidiaries in the Gulf. This will be the appearance of compliance in the short term. They will let Trump think he is winning.”

But unofficially the Russians believe there will be comprehensive black trading, rising prices of the oil benchmarks, larger price discounts for the Russian oil, and then a downward price correction as supply meets or exceeds demand. The global market calculation is the same, as the following charts of the Brent, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Urals price benchmarks illustrate. There was a three-day price jump from October 20 to 23 – up 12% for Brent, up 8% for WTI, up 12% for Urals – followed by a downturn over the last three days.

MARKET REACTION TO ROSNEFT, LUKOIL SANCTIONS

Image

Image
Source for all charts: https://oilprice.com/oil-price-charts/ -- as of October 27, 2025

The Russian sources believe these benchmark charts show the markets are pricing in Trump failure.

Said a Russian trade source in Dubai: “there is no way to stop the oil – only add more ship-to-ship transfers and add some more percentage to the middlemen, and off it goes. The point is that while everyone is fixed on [the Russian Central Bank] interest rates – you have state and private oil companies and the whole system more secretive than ever. The new sanction does not stop the oil moving into money. It just makes it more difficult, and that means more dollars per barrel for the middlemen. In Moscow business, banking, economic, and political circles there is confidence that the ten percentage points everyone has been making on oil dealmaking off the books, will continue. This is the Trump effect — we Russians aren’t ungrateful.”

Putin’s response to the Trump sanction announcement has been tempered. “Now, regarding the new sanctions. First, there is nothing new about them. Clearly, they will have serious implications for us, but they will not significantly affect our economic well-being. It is well known that during his first presidential term, President Trump imposed the largest number of sanctions ever imposed on the Russian Federation. Today, they have two aspects, namely, political and economic. What are we talking about in terms of the political aspect? It implies an attempt to put pressure on Russia. But no self-respecting country and no self-respecting people ever make decisions under pressure. Without a doubt, Russia has the privilege of considering itself among those self-respecting countries and peoples. That is the first point.”

“The second point is purely economic… First, it must be noted that overall production is currently at a plateau. Of course, a portion – though certainly not all, as that would be impossible – of Russian oil and petroleum products could be substituted on the global market. But, first, this requires time. Second, it demands substantial investment…Thus, it is not feasible to sharply increase production in the immediate term. However, if the quantity of our oil and petroleum products on the global market were to decrease abruptly, prices would rise, and I have discussed this with my American counterpart as well. What would this lead to? It would result in a sharp increase in the cost of oil and petroleum products, including at petrol stations – and the United States is no exception. If we consider the domestic political calendar in the United States, it is clear how sensitive certain processes could become in this context. Those advising the current [US] administration on such decisions should consider whom they are actually serving.”

A source in New Delhi comments: “At the macro level and for long-term energy supply and prices, Putin is right on the mark. Trump also doesn’t want to push the trade impact beyond a point. But the Europeans do, and they are the original architects of secondary sanctions. Also, they are the ones who have been after India from the start. Biden took a position to actively encourage India to buy Russian oil. Trump’s advisors form policy based on his foolhardy decisions but then stop him before the policy spirals out of control. He is operating a roller coaster in a theme park and sometimes he plays beyond safety limits.”

Backgrounder-3 — Trump’s attacks on drug-running “Venezuelan” boats.
To date, there have been nine separate military strikes by US drones or missiles. For the timeline of the operations, click to read.

To date also, there has been no reliable mapping of the location of the attacks to substantiate that the boats were in Venezuelan waters or originated from Venezuela. At least two of the US attacks have been officially located in the eastern Pacific; Venezuela does not have a Pacific coastline.

Image
Source: https://medium.com/the-polis/the-two-me ... bfca73802e

In investigative reporting by the Venezuelan, other Latin American and Spanish press, no evidence has been provided of drug smuggling, drug cargoes, or destinations on the US coastline more than one thousand nautical miles to the north. Just two men have been reported as surviving the attacks. They were from the October 16 “submarine” strike: one was an Ecuadorian, Andrés Fernando Tufiño; the other was a Colombian, Obando Perez. Even if Trump’s claims are correct that his strikes have been targeting fentanyl and cocaine cargoes, there is no evidence that the drug cargoes originated from Venezuela.


Backgrounder-4 — medical testing of Trump’s brain, October 24.
On October 10 the White House issued a memorandum by USN Captain Sean Barbabella, the White House Physician, reporting the results of a 4-hour examination of the President at the Walter Reed National Military Centre. Barbabella claimed the examination, which included “advanced imaging, laboratory testing, and preventive health assessments”, was “a scheduled follow-up evaluation”.

Image
Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/DPpqLPCkcqm/

Seventeen days later, as Trump flew with reporters on Air Force One, there was this question-and-answer exchange:
Question: The readout from Walter Reed mentioned advanced medical imaging. Did you get an MRI [Magnetic Resonance Imaging]? Can you tell us what that was?
Donald Trump: I did. I got an MRI. It was perfect. Yeah. I mean, I gave you the full results. We had an MRI. And — the machine, you know, the whole thing and it was perfect.
Question: Can you say what in particular they were looking for?
Donald Trump: You could ask the doctors. In fact, we have doctors traveling with us, but I think they gave you a very conclusive — nobody has ever given you reports like I gave you. And if I didn’t think it was going to be good either, I would let you know negatively. I wouldn’t run [for re-election in 2028]. I’d do something, but the doctor said some of the best reports — for the age, some of the best reports they’ve ever seen.”

According to the text of Barbabella’s White House report, Trump’s “cardiac age was found to be approximately 14 years younger than his chronological age”. There is no mention in the report of the testing of Trump’s brain or of his neurological condition except for the last line: Trump exhibits “strong cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological and physical performance.”

CT (computer tomography) brain scans were done on Trump following the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024; Trump ordered the Secret Service to remove the images from the hospital. MRI is the more sensitive of the scan types for investigating the soft tissues of the brain; CT scans can reveal the brain lesions which are symptomatic of white matter disease (WMD), but for more precise analysis of the soft tissues MRI scanning is the clinical diagnostic standard. “It’s like an IQ test”, Trump told staff at the hospital after the gunshot wound a year ago. “They tell you that your brain is good so I just want to have that.” There has been no report from the White House doctors on whether the “scheduled follow-up evaluation” of October 10 was a follow-up of the brain scans of the year before at Butler Hospital.

The latest neurological symptom which may have prompted this month’s MRI for Trump was the Bell’s Palsy–like droop on the side of his mouth which was recorded on September 11. His last hospital check-up was on April 11.

https://johnhelmer.net/the-three-stages ... more-92651

******

How Can Japan Handle Its $550 Billion Trump Problem?

Yesterday U.S. President Donald Trump visited Japan and met with its new Prime Minister Sanae Takaishi. Both are conservatives and agree on many points. Japan is a trusted vassal which rarely collides with the U.S. demands.

But one serious point of contention is open between the two nations and threatens to blow up the relation.

Earlier this year Trump had imposed a 25% tariff on U.S. imports from Japan. The previous prime minister had ‘sold the house’ to lower that rate:

So desperate was now-former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba to lower Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on Japanese products to 15%, especially on automotive products, that he signed on to an incredible surrender regarding Tokyo’s promise for the government to invest $550 billion in the US over the coming three years.

Not only does Trump get to choose the projects and the US get the lion’s share of any profits, but if Japan dares to reject any of Trump’s schemes as nonviable, Ishiba has given Trump permission to impose even higher tariffs. The jointly-signed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) says that, “In the case where Japan elects not to fund [a project Trump has named—rk], the United States may also impose tariff rate or rates on Japanese imports into the United States at the rate determined by the President [emphasis added].”


The total surrender took the form of a Memorandum of Understanding which did not require a vote in the Diet. But the enormous amount of money it pledges to invest in the U.S. would need parliamentary approval. There was and is practically not chance that anything like it would pass. The ‘investment’ would blow up Japan’s government budget. It would also increase the U.S. trade deficit with Japan.

The completely unbalanced agreement was one reason why Ishiba was ousted from his position.

I had wondered how Takaishi would handle this most important issues. But it seems that both sides have agreed to ignore it:

Inside a gold-drenched palace in Tokyo on Tuesday, President Trump heaped praise on Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s new prime minister, telling her that their countries were “allies at the strongest level” and vowing to come to Japan’s aide on “any favors you need.”

The leaders signed two vaguely worded agreements — one declaring a “new golden age of the US-Japan alliance,” and another to cooperate on expanding the supply chain for rare earth metals — but there was little sign of any breakthrough in the details of the trade deal both countries signed onto in July.

There was no public talk about a major point of contention between the two countries: the details of how Japan intends to spend a promised $550 billion investment into the United States. The promise came as part of the trade deal, and in return for the large investment, Japan was to receive a 15 percent tariff on its exports — a lower rate than Mr. Trump had initially threatened.

Instead, both leaders focused more on what they had in common …


Another report says that the deal was mentioned on the sideline but that nothing was done to resolve its problems:

Trump’s trip to Japan was an early test of whether Takaichi could build inroads with the American president as the countries grapple with security commitments, trade tensions and the threat of China. Japan faces a daunting promise to invest $550 billion in the United States in exchange for lower tariff rates, and Trump administration officials have signaled they want Japan to pay more money to host U.S. troops.

Over a lunch of American rice and beef cooked with Japanese ingredients, the prime minister presented Trump with a map of the investments Japan is making into the United States, after the country committed to pour $550 billion into the United States in exchange for lower tariffs. In return, Trump signed lunch menus for Takaichi and her delegation.


“Look, I got a lunch menue signed by Trump and all I had to pay for it were $550 billion.” I don’t think that’s how the world, outside of Trump’s mind, really works.

Trump wants the money to build a ‘sovereign wealth fund’ which he can use to buy and control shares of U.S. companies.

It is therefore likely that he will insist that Japan fulfills the MoU no matter what. But Japan can not do that and Takaichi will have to solve the problem.

As the issue could create a break in U.S.- Japan relations Takaichi will have to prepare for that to happen. Alastair Crooke detects signs that she is already doing this:

In her first address to the nation, Takaishi said that she would not support the US trade war against China, and would not become an instrument of US economic pressure. She openly criticised Trump’s tariff policy, calling it ‘the most dangerous mistake of the 21stcentury’.

Reuters commented that her stance was wholly unexpected in Washington. A big shock. It emerged that since taking office, the new PM had held a series of meetings with the largest Japanese corporations who had conveyed a unified and urgent message to her: Simply — the Japanese economy would not survive another trade war.

Then, one week after taking office, she openly expressed support for China, executing the biggest foreign policy pivot since WW2. China was no longer the ‘enemy’.


Might this be Japan’s real strategy?

To caress the narcissism in Trump to divert him from a Japanese move towards China which eventually may allow it to break with the U.S.?

I for one would call that a good plan.

Posted by b on October 28, 2025 at 17:52 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2025/10/h ... oblem.html

******

Trump Visit Met by Popular Protests in Malaysia Over US Backing of Israel
October 28, 2025

Image
Malaysians protest Trump visit. Photo: PSM/FB.

By Abdul Rahman – Oct 27, 2025

The Malaysian government also faced condemnation from protesters who criticized its decision to invite Trump to the 47th ASEAN summit despite US attempts to destabilize the region.

Hundreds of people took to the streets in Malaysia on Sunday, October 26, to oppose US President Donald Trump’s visit to the country. Protesters raised slogans in support of the Palestinian resistance and condemned US support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Protesters also opposed various interventionist policies followed by the US across the globe with chants of “down with imperialism” and demanded Malaysia break its ties with it.

The call for the demonstration was made by the Socialist Party of Malaysia (PSM), along with several other organizations who gathered at Kuala Lumpur’s Independence Square and Ampang Park with banners and posters denouncing imperialism and shouting slogans in support of the Palestinian people.

Protesters also formed a people’s tribunal to try Trump for his role in the Gaza genocide and other war crimes across the world. The tribunal sentenced Trump and people threw shoes at Trump’s cut outs.

Trump was visiting Malaysia for two days to attend the 47th ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur. This is his first trip to South-East Asia since assuming the presidency for the second time. He also met Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim for bilateral talks.

“US leaders who endorse and fund the zionist regime’s genocide against the Palestinian people and impose economic sanctions on countries like Venezuela must not be received with red carpets or diplomatic honors” Bawani KS, senior leader of the PSM, told Peoples Dispatch.

“Welcoming those complicit in crimes against humanity undermines the global struggle for justice and dignity. Justice for Palestine is not negotiable. Silence in complicity,” she further said.

In a joint statement issued by the PSM and several civil society and student groups, they demanded that the US stop supporting the genocidal regime in Israel and stop its interference across the globe, including in the South-East Asia region.

They demanded that the Malaysian government cut all diplomatic ties with the US, including its joint military exercises, such as RIMPAC, until it ends its ties with genocidal Israel and other imperialistic interventions across the world.

Open letter to Trump
PSM chairperson M Jeyakumar Devaraj wrote an open letter to Trump pointing out how his support to Israeli genocide in Gaza led to an additional killing of over 20,000 Palestinians since January this year.

Trump’s refusal to undo Joe Biden’s policies of supplying weapons to the Zionist regime, which it used to kill Palestinians and destroy Gaza, and his administration’s repeated use of veto power to stop UN Security Council resolutions demanding a ceasefire and humanitarian aid emboldened the Zionist regime to carry out its genocide without repercussion, the letter notes.

The PSM letter to Trump also underlined that the Malaysians are protesting against US hegemonic politics and its persistent interference in other country’s affairs, defying their sovereignty and international laws.

“From Cuba to Venezuela, Iran, Libya, Syria and Afghanistan we have witnessed how the US has unilaterally imposed painful economic sanctions or funded armed insurrections just because these countries had a different vision of how to develop their societies,” the letter says.

Every country, however small, has the right to determine its own course of development, PSM points out, asserting that the economic sanctions and military interventions should only be decided by a super-majority in the United Nations and not by the US, together with its “coalition of the willing.”

The letter also warns against growing US aggression vis-a-vis China fearing that this may lead to military conflict in the South China Sea and destabilize the region.

Claiming that “Malaysia, together with our ASEAN neighbors, have long proclaimed this region as a Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality (ZOFAN)” the letter warns against America’s “constant needling of China” as it may lead to an Eastern Europe-like situation where, pushed by NATO, “the Russian leadership, believing that they faced an existential threat, decided to respond militarily.”

The letter demanded the immediate cessation of all such provocations and a resolution of the differences, if any, through peaceful means.

The war in Ukraine, apart from killing hundreds, has also created economic hardship for people and aided in the popularity of the political right wing, leading to sustained social unrest in Europe. South-East Asia will not like to turn into one such region, the PSM letter to Trump says.

https://orinocotribune.com/trump-visit- ... of-israel/

******

What Happened, Donny?

Your master ignored you again?

Israel launches strikes on Gaza, reports say, after Netanyahu orders 'powerful' attacks.

Ay-yay-yay, Bibi owns you, Donny, he owns your family and you will continue to do as Israel and your AIPAC donors tell you because they know you better than you do yourself. Granted, it is not that difficult to decode you. Go, put out the performance of your life convincing the remaining "true believers" in how great the country is doing.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2025/10 ... donny.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply