Palestine

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Sun Jun 08, 2025 3:01 pm

Israel kills more aid-seeking civilians after GHF misleads Palestinians into military zones

Over 100 Palestinians have been killed and hundreds injured at aid sites since the US-Israeli mechanism was launched

News Desk

JUN 8, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Moaz Abu Taha/Reuters)

Several Palestinians were killed on 8 June at aid distribution sites in Gaza, as a result of the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s (GHF) schedule conflicting with strict Israeli military orders.


Gaza-based journalist Islam Bader noted on Sunday that GHF had announced that distribution would begin at 5:00 AM at the Netzarim site. However, the Israeli army has classified the area as a closed military zone from 6:00 PM to 8:00 AM, and entering it during those hours is strictly prohibited and extremely dangerous.

Despite warnings, civilians arrived early. The distribution ended by 6:30 AM due to a severe shortage of aid parcels.

Some frustrated civilians began dismantling parts of the site, prompting US private contractors to use pepper spray in response.

Israeli troops then opened fire, killing one person and injuring 15.

At the Tal al-Sultan GHF site in the southern city of Rafah, starving Palestinians arrived early as well, at around 5:00 AM.

While they were waiting, Israeli tanks, gunboats, and snipers opened fire on the gathering, killing four.

GHF did not announce until after the deadly attack that the site would open at 12:00 PM.

Over 110 Palestinian aid seekers have been killed by Israeli army forces since the US-Israeli aid mechanism in Gaza was launched on 27 May, according to numbers released by the Gaza Government Media Office.

Around 600 starving Palestinians have been injured, and nine remain missing.

On Saturday, Israeli forces killed at least eight Palestinians waiting near a GHF aid distribution point in Al-Akhawah, near Rafah.

Israel's 11-week blockade of the strip is leading to famine in Gaza, which UN officials recently called the "hungriest place on earth." Israel began allowing some trucks loaded with food to enter the strip on 19 May, but so far, only a trickle of aid has reached Palestinians.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-ki ... tary-zones

Israel vows 'escalation' of West Bank land theft if EU recognizes Palestine

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has ordered the development of a plan to impose ‘Israeli sovereignty’ over the occupied territory

News Desk

JUN 6, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Getty Images)

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich warned on 6 June that Tel Aviv has prepared an “escalation plan” in the occupied West Bank if European countries move forward with a push to recognize a Palestinian state.

“We have an escalation plan in the West Bank if France and other European countries continue to push for recognition of a Palestinian state,” Smotrich said.

He added that the Israeli plan “includes imposing sovereignty over Area C in the West Bank, displacing the residents of Khan al-Ahmar, and disrupting the banking system,” he added.

One day earlier, Smotrich participated in a tour of new illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

The finance minister said during the tour that he has issued direct instructions to Israel’s Settlement Directorate to expedite the legalization of new settlements and develop a plan to impose “Israeli sovereignty” on all remaining land in the occupied West Bank, according to Hebrew outlet Channel 7.

“We don't raise slogans, we implement them. Every inch of this land must become an integral part of Israel,” Smotrich added.

“The settlement projects that the occupation is racing against time to establish in the West Bank cannot change the reality of the land and its identity, and they will not shake the conviction of our people and our resistance that the occupation will end, no matter how persistent its brutality and arrogance,” Hamas leader Abdel Hakim Hanini said on Thursday in response.

Smotrich has been one of the spearheads of the Israeli government’s plans for the annexation of the occupied West Bank.

He was among those who pushed last month’s Israeli cabinet decision to take full responsibility for land registration in Area C of the occupied West Bank – an area comprising around 60 percent of the territory and home to the vast majority of Israeli settlements. The move was described as a de facto annexation of Palestinian land.

In 2023, Israel transferred a significant portion of the occupied West Bank’s administration away from the military into Smotrich’s hands, giving him power over civilian issues in the occupied territory, including authority over unlicensed settler outposts and settlement construction plans.

Late last month, Israel's government approved 22 new illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Tel Aviv has been pushing back against recent calls by France for EU countries to recognize Palestinian statehood.

This month, France and Saudi Arabia will co-chair a UN conference aimed at resurrecting the idea of the two-state solution.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz vowed on 30 May that Tel Aviv will build a “Jewish Israeli state” in the occupied West Bank, while affirming the rejection of Palestinian statehood in a “clear message” to French President Emmanuel Macron.

Smotrich’s comments and Tel Aviv’s escalating rhetoric against the occupied West Bank coincide with a surge in violent settler attacks on Palestinians, as well as illegal land grabs – all carried out with the backing of the Israeli army.

Israeli settlers torched several Palestinian homes and properties on Wednesday, injuring dozens of residents in the town of Deir Dibwan, east of Ramallah.

Settlers set fire to at least seven houses, 10 vehicles, sheep pens, and a horse stable, according to local media outlets.

On 1 June, Israeli occupation forces declared the village of Masafer Yatta (in the southern occupied West Bank) a closed military zone, expelled residents, journalists, and international supporters, and demanded a list of all local inhabitants.

The move followed weeks of violence, including large-scale demolitions in early May, after which settlers began systematically seizing residential areas, vandalizing property, and grazing livestock across Palestinian farmland, under the military’s protection.

Legal appeals to remove the settlers have been rejected by Israeli courts, while new outposts and permanent infrastructure continue to be established.

Human rights groups and local residents warn that what is happening is part of a deliberate, state-backed campaign to Judaize the South Hebron Hills, mirroring similar expulsions elsewhere in the occupied West Bank.

Israel has been trying to drive Palestinians out of Masafer Yatta for at least 40 years.

In late March, Israel's Security Cabinet approved the final phase of the “Fabric of Life Road” project near occupied Jerusalem, an initiative that aims to reroute Palestinian traffic and effectively sever territorial continuity in the occupied West Bank.

While framed as a logistical upgrade, the road will block Palestinian access to the critical area between Jerusalem and Maale Adumim, including Khan al-Ahmar – a village seen as pivotal to the viability of any future Palestinian state.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-vo ... -palestine

Gaza Freedom Flotilla reaches Egyptian coast

Israeli authorities have pledged to halt the Madleen, which is transporting a dozen activists seeking to breach the siege of Gaza

News Desk

JUN 7, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Getty Images)

The Madleen ship, carrying 12 activists, including environmental activist Greta Thunberg, reached the Egyptian coast on 7 June en route to Gaza with the aim of breaking Israel’s naval blockade of the strip.

Launched by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) from Sicily on 1 June, the small vessel is carrying a limited amount of humanitarian aid to the starving population of Gaza.

On board are rights advocates, lawmakers, and medical volunteers, including European Parliament member Rima Hassan, who has urged governments to “guarantee safe passage” for the vessel, warning that an Israeli interception would violate international humanitarian law.

“We are now sailing off the Egyptian coast. We are all good,” German human rights activist Yasemin Acar told AFP by phone on 8 June.

The Madleen set sail about one month after an Israeli drone strike targeted another flotilla vessel, the Conscience, forcing Cyprus and Malta to dispatch rescue ships.


Organizers from the London-based International Committee for Breaking the Siege of Gaza have warned that any attempt to stop the Madleen would constitute “a blatant violation of international humanitarian law.”

Despite this, Israeli officials have publicly stated that the Madleen will not be allowed to reach Gaza, with reports in Israeli media quoting military sources saying the vessel will be intercepted before entering the coastal enclave’s territorial waters. However, there has been no formal statement on the timing or location of the planned interception.

In previous cases, Israeli forces have boarded and seized similar ships, towing them to the port of Ashdod and detaining the activists on board.

“We are not violating any law. On the contrary, we are standing up for humanitarian law,” Acar said in a live update from the ship.

https://thecradle.co/articles/gaza-free ... tian-coast
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Jun 09, 2025 2:33 pm

Image
Fire engulfs a classroom at the Fahmi Al-Jargawi School in Gaza City following an Israeli strike, May 26, 2025.

One day, everyone will have always been against this
Originally published: Canadian Dimension on June 7, 2025 by Derek Sayer (more by Canadian Dimension) | (Posted Jun 09, 2025)

One of the most remarkable—not to say shameful—features of the last 20 months of carnage in Gaza has been the near-unanimity of support for Israel’s assault from Western governments and political parties of otherwise sharply opposed persuasions, regardless of how criminally Israel has conducted its “war.”

Joe Biden and Donald Trump, Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer, Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poiliévre, Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen, Olaf Scholz and Friedrich Merz, not to mention Viktor Orban, Antony Albanese, Donald Tusk, Geert Wilders, Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas are unlikely bedfellows, but all have come together on Israel’s “right to defend itself” against Hamas “terrorism.”

In the name of this principle—whose legality is dubious, given that Gaza is not a foreign power but (according to the world’s highest court) a territory that Israel has de facto occupied since 1967, whose civilian population it therefore has a legal duty to protect—even the mildest Western expressions of “concern” over this or that IDF “excess” have invariably been prefaced (“balanced”) by obligatory ritualistic condemnations of Hamas.

With the partial exception of the Guardian, which has allowed its columnists like Arwa Mahdawi and Nesrine Malik to pen op-eds that were critical of Israel, the mainstream Western media from the BBC to the New York Times, CNN to the Washington Post, have all generally been content to toe this official line. While Israel’s justifications—and lies—have been amplified, its atrocities have been sidelined, minimized, or not reported at all.

Under the sign of October 7
Such partiality was perhaps comprehensible in the immediate aftermath of October 7, when images of the horror were fresh in people’s minds. But little changed either with revelations that what happened on October 7 was less clearcut than Israeli propaganda had presented it or with the mounting deaths, destruction, and undeniable evidence over the ensuing weeks and months that Israel was routinely committing war crimes in Gaza.

It mattered not that the final figure for deaths in Israel on October 7 was 1,139, not the 1,400 at first reported; nor that one-third of these were soldiers, police, or security guards—in other words, combatants—rather than “mostly civilians”; nor that most of the atrocity stories that did so much to mobilize Western opinion behind Israel in the ensuing weeks were either totally discredited, like the fairy tales of 40 beheaded babies, babies baked in ovens, and babies ripped from their mothers’ wombs, or, like the “mass rape” allegations, lacked any convincing supporting evidence. Politicians like Biden, Blinken, and Trudeau continued to repeat these myths long after they had been debunked in the Israeli press.

It mattered not that many of the Israelis who perished on October 7 were later shown to have died from IDF “friendly fire,” resulting either from the fog of war or implementation of Israel’s Hannibal Directive, which authorizes killing one’s own rather than letting them be taken prisoner. Many of the young people killed at the Nova music festival were likely casualties of fire from IDF helicopter gunships; the burned-out hulks of their cars, which could not have been produced by Hamas’s light weaponry, strongly suggest as much.

Nor did it matter that 18 months ago, on January 24, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that there was “a real and imminent risk” of genocide occurring in Gaza and mandated six provisional measures aimed at “preserving … the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide.” The court imposed further measures on March 28 and May 24. All were simply ignored by Israel, with the open or tacit support of the United States and Israel’s other Western allies, including Canada.

It is difficult to think of a more blatant snub to the international rule of law—unless it be the howls of Western outrage that greeted the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) last November 21 for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.” The U.S. has now instituted sanctions against the judges who authorized the arrest warrants.

Only one thing mattered. For 20 months it sufficed to invoke “the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust” to forestall further debate. In democracies that pride themselves on their respect for freedom of expression and human rights, anyone who questioned Israel’s narrative, from journalists, artists, actors and novelists to sports commentators, children’s entertainers, and rap musicians, were vilified as “antisemites,” harassed by the agencies of the state, and “canceled” from the public domain.

If not now, when?
One of the first signs that this unholy consensus among the major Western powers might at long last be cracking was a striking shift in tone in some leading British newspapers.

What appears to have tipped the scales this time were warnings of imminent famine in Gaza resulting from the total blockade on supplies of food, water, power, and medicine Israel had imposed on the Strip since March 2, two weeks before it unilaterally broke the truce it had agreed with Hamas in January and resumed its full-scale military offensive.

On May 4, the Guardian ran a lead editorial titled “Israel’s aid blockade of Gaza: hunger as a weapon of war,” which concluded:

What is shameful is that almost half the children in Gaza questioned in a study said that they wished to die. What is shameful is that so many civilians have been killed, and so many more pushed to the brink of starvation. What is shameful is that this has, indeed, been allowed to happen.

The next day the Daily Mirror, historically the most left-wing of Britain’s tabloids, devoted its front page as well as two inside pages to a story by Defense Editor Chris Hughes titled “Horror in Gaza.” The headline read “OUR CHILDREN ARE STARVING.”

On May 6 the Financial Times—the most establishment of UK establishment papers—openly challenged Israel’s “self-defence” protestations in a powerful editorial headed “The west’s shameful silence on Gaza”:

Each new offensive makes it harder not to suspect that the ultimate goal of Netanyahu’s far-right coalition is to ensure Gaza is uninhabitable and drive Palestinians from their land. For two months, Israel has blocked delivery of all aid into the strip. Child malnutrition rates are rising, the few functioning hospitals are running out of medicine, and warnings of starvation and disease are growing louder. Yet the U.S. and European countries that tout Israel as an ally that shares their values have issued barely a word of condemnation. They should be ashamed of their silence, and stop enabling Netanyahu to act with impunity.

Martin Sandbu’s June 2 op-ed, which argued that “it is in Europe’s interest to impose sanctions on Israel,” is something the FT would never have countenanced previously.

“End the deafening silence on Gaza—it is time to speak up,” proclaimed a lead editorial in The Independent on May 10, explaining that times had changed:

The world was stunned by the horrific Hamas atrocity of October 7, 2023, in southern Israel, in which 1,200 people were killed and 251 hostages seized—the youngest just nine months old. Despite its fierce retaliation raising immediate alarm, Israel found international backing for the right to defend itself…

But now any initial moral justification for continuing to prosecute the war 18 months on has been lost—and the disgust we once reserved for Hamas militants transferred to the brutal and relentless assaults by the Israel Defense Forces and the humanitarian disaster caused by its blockade.


Ramming its message home with a picture of hungry Palestinian children, the next day’s Independent devoted its entire front page to Gaza, calling upon “Britain and its allies to force Israel to end a cruel war that… has long since lost any moral justification.”

“The unfolding famine in Gaza is an obscenity the world must no longer tolerate,” the Independent again thundered on May 29.

It is an outrage that Israel, the occupying power ignoring its obligations to treat civilians properly, should behave in this manner; it is an even greater act of shame that the world should continue to tolerate it.

On May 8 the Economist published an article suggesting that the Gaza Health Ministry death toll was a significant undercount and that “between 77,000 and 109,000 Gazans have been killed, 4-5% of the territory’s pre-war population,” and the lead editorial demanded that “The war in Gaza must end.” Even Rupert Murdoch’s reliably pro-Israel Times carried an editorial titled “Israel’s friends cannot be blind to suffering in Palestine.”

On May 11, the Guardian broke the taboo on the dreaded G-word, whose application to Gaza by correspondents or interviewees the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN have all done their utmost to ban, asking:

Now [Israel] plans a Gaza without Palestinians. What is this, if not genocidal? When will the U.S. and its allies act to stop the horror, if not now?

The lawyers and the literati weigh in
On May 26, more than 800 UK legal professionals published a letter to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer asserting that Israel’s actions in Gaza constituted war crimes, crimes against humanity, and possible genocide. They went on to demand that the UK government honour the ICC warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant, impose sanctions, and trigger the suspension of Israel’s UN membership by invoking Article 6 of the UN Charter.

These were not Donald Trump’s “radical left lunatic” judges and lawyers. Signatories included former Supreme Court justices Lady Hale, Lord Sumption, and Lord Wilson; former Court of Appeal judges Sir Stephen Sedley, Sir Anthony Hooper, and Sir Alan Moses; and more than 70 King’s Counsel, including former chairs of the Bar Council of England and Wales, the Criminal Bar Association, and the Bar of Northern Ireland.

Two days later, 380 writers from England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland issued a statement begging “the peoples of the world to join us in ending our collective silence and inaction in the face of horror.” Among the self-styled “Writers for Gaza” were Ian McEwan, Hanif Kureshi, Geoff Dyer, Jeannette Winterton, Pico Iyer, Russell T. Davis, and Zadie Smith, all eminent figures in British cultural life.

Pointing out that “The use of the words ‘genocide’ or ‘acts of genocide’ to describe what is happening in Gaza is no longer debated by international legal experts or human rights organizations”—the letter referenced Amnesty International, Médecins Sans Frontières, Human Rights Watch, the International Federation for Human Rights, and the United Nations Human Rights Council—the writers’ condemnation of Israel was unequivocal:

The term “genocide” is not a slogan. It carries legal, political, and moral responsibilities. Just as it is true to call the atrocities committed by Hamas against innocent civilians on October 7, 2023 crimes of war and crimes against humanity, so today it is true to name the attack on the people of Gaza an atrocity of genocide, with crimes of war and crimes against humanity, committed daily by the Israel Defence Forces, at the command of the government of the State of Israel.

The writers went on to demand an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted distribution of aid to Gaza through the UN, with the imposition of sanctions if Israel refused to comply.

While musician Brian Eno and historian William Dalrymple have repeatedly called out Israeli crimes over the last 20 months, the same cannot be said for all of the letter’s signatories. Many had remained silent up to now, and some have shifted their positions.

Zadie Smith, for example, copped a lot of social media flak for having described the language of student protestors in a May 2024 New Yorker article as “weapons of mass destruction” while refusing to take sides on Gaza.

To be fair, she had hardly represented Hamas’s and Israel’s crimes as comparable in scale:

The monstrous and brutal mass murder of more than eleven hundred people, the majority of them civilians, dozens of them children, on October 7th, has been followed by the monstrous and brutal mass murder (at the time of writing) of a reported fourteen thousand five hundred children. And many more human beings besides…

Are these instances of better late than never? Or are they, as some have argued, efforts to launder reputations while there is still time, to escape charges of complicity in what is increasingly being recognized as a genocide? As Omar El Akkad grimly predicted in his book of the same title, One Day, Everyone Will Always Have Been Against This.

Bringing up in the rear, the politicians
Other public figures have also been having second thoughts on Gaza. UK broadcaster Piers Morgan recently told Mehdi Hasan:

Listen, you and I have talked about this war in Gaza ever since it started, this phase of the 75-year conflict. I have resisted going as far as you have done in your criticism of the Israeli government. I resist no more.

Former U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller, who made himself notorious for his smirking defense of Israeli actions under the Biden administration, admitted in a Sky News interview that “I don’t think it’s a genocide, but I think, I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes.”

Asked why he lied about this at the time, Miller responded:

When you’re at the podium, you’re not expressing your personal opinion.

You’re expressing the conclusions of the United States government. The United States government had not concluded that they committed war crimes, still have not concluded [that].


In other words, he was only following orders. This defence didn’t wash at the Nuremberg Trials, and is unlikely to wash today should Miller—or anybody else who has helped Israel carry out or cover up its crimes in Gaza—find themselves in the ICC dock in the Hague.

No doubt this consideration is beginning to weigh with the West’s political leaders, some of whom now appear to be in an unseemly rush to cover their asses.

In October 2024, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy—who like Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a long-standing members of Labour Friends of Israel—told Parliament that to speak of genocide in Gaza “undermines the seriousness of that term,” which he wanted to reserve for “when millions of people lost their lives in crises like Rwanda, the Second World War and the Holocaust.”

This is a definition that not only (willfully?) misinterprets international law but conflicts with the British government’s own stance on genocides in Srbenica and Myanmar.

Questioned as to whether Lammy spoke for the government, Keir Starmer responded with a characteristic deflection:

It would be wise to start a question like that by a reference to what happened in October of last year [2023]. I am well aware of the definition of genocide, and that is why I have never described this or referred to it as genocide.

He cannot do so, of course, without laying open both his government and his person to criminal charges of complicity in the most heinous of all crimes.

All the more significant then, that David Lammy told Parliament on March 17 that though Israel “quite rightly must defend its own security,” its latest blockade was a “breach of international law.” The next day Starmer publicly rebuked his foreign secretary for saying the quiet bit out loud (“The government is not an international court, and, therefore, it is up to courts to make judgments”), but nevertheless conceded that “Israel’s actions in Gaza are at clear risk of breaching international humanitarian law.”

Several senior British Conservative MPs are also seemingly having a change of heart on Gaza. On May 6 Kit Malthouse organized a letter to Keir Starmer signed by seven MPs and six members of the House of Lords calling upon the government to stand “against indefinite occupation” and “reinforce international law,” and recognize the state of Palestine “as a necessary step to reinforce international law and diplomacy.” That same day, Conservative MP Mark Pritchard told the House of Commons,

I have supported Israel, pretty much at all costs. But today, I want to say that I got it wrong.

Against this background, Keir Starmer for the UK, Emmanuel Macron for France, and Mark Carney for Canada issued an unusually strongly worded statement on May 19 threatening that “If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.”

Though the three leaders did not—for perhaps obvious reasons—use the word genocide, they left no doubt as to their disgust at Israel’s “egregious actions”:

The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law.

The statement went on to condemn “any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank … which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians,” threatening that in this case, too,

We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions.

The following day David Lammy addressed the Commons again. “We are now entering a dark new phase in this conflict,” he told MPs:

Netanyahu’s Government plan to drive Gazans from their homes into a corner of the strip to the south and permit them a fraction of the aid that they need. Yesterday, Minister Smotrich even spoke of Israeli forces ‘cleansing’ Gaza, of ‘destroying what’s left’ and of resident Palestinians being ‘relocated to third countries’. We must call this what it is: it is extremism, it is dangerous, it is repellent, it is monstrous and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms… Israel’s plan is morally unjustifiable, wholly disproportionate and utterly counterproductive, and whatever Israeli Ministers claim, it is not the way to bring the hostages safely home.

Though Lammy’s speech was passionate, the accompanying actions were modest: the suspension of trade talks with Israel, which were stalled anyway, and a largely symbolic imposition of sanctions on a handful of settler extremists in the West Bank.

Are these indications that the rats are finally preparing to abandon Israel’s sinking ship? Or are they just cosmetic gestures, designed to cover up Western complicity in the Gaza genocide while doing nothing serious to stop it? Only time will tell. Unfortunately time is a luxury the starving people of Gaza do not have.

The official death toll in Gaza—Israel’s payback for the 1,139 deaths on October 7—now stands at nearly 55,000, the majority of them women and children. Where are those “concrete actions,” Mr. Starmer, Mr. Macron—Mr. Carney? As you convene for your G7 summit in Kananaskis, the world awaits.

Are you prepared to face down Donald Trump, who has thrown his full support behind Israel and is salivating at the prospect of America rebuilding an ethnically cleansed Gaza as the “Riviera of the Middle East”?

Three weeks have now passed since your declaration of intent, and so far we have seen nothing but words.

It’s only words
In the contentious New Yorker article mentioned earlier, Zadie Smith’s intent was to draw attention to “the use of words to justify bloody murder, to flatten and erase unbelievably labyrinthine histories, and to deliver the atavistic pleasure of violent simplicity to the many people who seem to believe that merely by saying something they make it so.”

Under other circumstances, I would be the first to agree that in this case as in others, “language and rhetoric are and always have been weapons of mass destruction”:

It is no doubt a great relief to say the word “Hamas” as if it purely and solely described a terrorist entity. A great relief to say “There is no such thing as the Palestinian people” as they stand in front of you. A great relief to say “Zionist colonialist state” and accept those three words as a full and unimpeachable definition of the state of Israel, not only under the disastrous leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu but at every stage of its long and complex history, and also to hear them as a perfectly sufficient description of every man, woman, and child who has ever lived in Israel or happened to find themselves born within it. It is perhaps because we know these simplifications to be impossible that we insist upon them so passionately.

But these are not other circumstances. And however belatedly, more people like Zadie Smith—and even a few politicians—may be waking up to that fact. This is not a time for nuance.

Ta-Nehisi Coates probably said it best when, commenting on the part played by Biden’s Gaza policy in Kamala Harris’s electoral defeat by Donald Trump, he argued:

We are at a moment right now where people are asking themselves why can’t the Democratic Party defend [Trump’s] assault on democracy… and I would submit to you that if you can’t draw the line at genocide, you probably can’t draw the line at democracy.

The “labyrinthine” complexity of the Israel-Palestine conflict—whose century-long history includes plentiful atrocities on both sides—cannot be used to obscure the simple moral truth that lies at the foundation of all international humanitarian law.

It is necessary to condemn war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide wherever and whenever they occur—irrespective of the identity of their perpetrators or the justice of the causes in whose name they are committed.

If we forget this, the genocide in Gaza will point the way to a future without law for the whole of humanity, and Western democracies’ selfishness, cowardice, and indifference will have let it.

https://mronline.org/2025/06/09/one-day ... inst-this/#

******

Israel seizes Gaza Freedom Flotilla, detains activists

Israeli navy boats and quadcopter drones surrounded the humanitarian aid vessel as it was trying to break the siege on Gaza

News Desk

JUN 9, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Israeli Foreign Ministry/X)

Israeli forces intercepted the Gaza Freedom Flotilla’s Madleen vessel in international waters early on 9 June as it was approaching Gaza to break the siege, seizing the boat and detaining the 12 activists on board.

“The ship was unlawfully boarded, its unarmed civilian crew abducted, and its life-saving cargo – including baby formula, food, and medical supplies – confiscated,” the Gaza Freedom Flotilla said.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry announced in a statement on Monday that its forces took control of the “selfie yacht” and towed it to the port of Ashdod. “The passengers are expected to return to their home countries.”

“There are ways to deliver aid to the Gaza Strip – they do not involve Instagram selfies. The tiny amount of aid that was on the yacht and not consumed by the ‘celebrities’ will be transferred to Gaza through real humanitarian channels,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry added.

The Foreign Ministry also said that the “show is over,” publishing footage of the detained activists being provided water and sandwiches while being transported to Ashdod port.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz praised the takeover of the ship, and said he ordered the army to force the activists to watch a video of Hamas’s “atrocities” on 7 October, 2023.

“It’s appropriate that Greta the antisemite and her Hamas-supporting friends should see exactly who is the terror group Hamas that they support and act on behalf of, what atrocious acts they carried out on women, the elderly, and kids, and who Israel is fighting for its defense against,” he said.

Video footage of the moment Israeli forces advanced toward the vessel circulated on social media, showing the activists holding their hands up.

Israeli quadcopter drones and navy vessels surrounded the Madleen during the interception.

The Madleen was carrying a meager but ‘symbolic’ amount of humanitarian aid as a protest and a humanitarian effort, described by the organizers as a last-ditch attempt to urge world governments to take immediate action and restore safe channels for delivering essential aid and medical supplies.

The Left group in the European Parliament condemned Israel’s seizure of the Madleen aid ship as a “blatant violation of international law.” The political group, which includes 46 lawmakers, said the arrest of the crew and confiscation of humanitarian supplies is part of a broader strategy to “starve and massacre Palestinians in Gaza while hiding Israeli war crimes from the world.”

In a statement, it urged the EU, UN, and international community to condemn the detention, demand the crew’s unconditional release, and ensure unimpeded aid entry into Gaza. “Solidarity is not a crime, genocide is,” it added.

In a post on social media, UN special rapporteur on human rights in Palestine, Francesca Albanese, said, “Madleen's journey may have ended, but the mission isn't over. Every Mediterranean port must send boats with aid and solidarity to Gaza.”

Israel’s blockade of Gaza has resulted in the spread of famine across the strip.

A joint report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Food Program (WFP) released on 5 June states that over one million Palestinians may face fatal levels of starvation by mid-July.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-se ... -activists
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Mon Jun 09, 2025 2:33 pm

Image
Fire engulfs a classroom at the Fahmi Al-Jargawi School in Gaza City following an Israeli strike, May 26, 2025.

One day, everyone will have always been against this
Originally published: Canadian Dimension on June 7, 2025 by Derek Sayer (more by Canadian Dimension) | (Posted Jun 09, 2025)

One of the most remarkable—not to say shameful—features of the last 20 months of carnage in Gaza has been the near-unanimity of support for Israel’s assault from Western governments and political parties of otherwise sharply opposed persuasions, regardless of how criminally Israel has conducted its “war.”

Joe Biden and Donald Trump, Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer, Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poiliévre, Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen, Olaf Scholz and Friedrich Merz, not to mention Viktor Orban, Antony Albanese, Donald Tusk, Geert Wilders, Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas are unlikely bedfellows, but all have come together on Israel’s “right to defend itself” against Hamas “terrorism.”

In the name of this principle—whose legality is dubious, given that Gaza is not a foreign power but (according to the world’s highest court) a territory that Israel has de facto occupied since 1967, whose civilian population it therefore has a legal duty to protect—even the mildest Western expressions of “concern” over this or that IDF “excess” have invariably been prefaced (“balanced”) by obligatory ritualistic condemnations of Hamas.

With the partial exception of the Guardian, which has allowed its columnists like Arwa Mahdawi and Nesrine Malik to pen op-eds that were critical of Israel, the mainstream Western media from the BBC to the New York Times, CNN to the Washington Post, have all generally been content to toe this official line. While Israel’s justifications—and lies—have been amplified, its atrocities have been sidelined, minimized, or not reported at all.

Under the sign of October 7
Such partiality was perhaps comprehensible in the immediate aftermath of October 7, when images of the horror were fresh in people’s minds. But little changed either with revelations that what happened on October 7 was less clearcut than Israeli propaganda had presented it or with the mounting deaths, destruction, and undeniable evidence over the ensuing weeks and months that Israel was routinely committing war crimes in Gaza.

It mattered not that the final figure for deaths in Israel on October 7 was 1,139, not the 1,400 at first reported; nor that one-third of these were soldiers, police, or security guards—in other words, combatants—rather than “mostly civilians”; nor that most of the atrocity stories that did so much to mobilize Western opinion behind Israel in the ensuing weeks were either totally discredited, like the fairy tales of 40 beheaded babies, babies baked in ovens, and babies ripped from their mothers’ wombs, or, like the “mass rape” allegations, lacked any convincing supporting evidence. Politicians like Biden, Blinken, and Trudeau continued to repeat these myths long after they had been debunked in the Israeli press.

It mattered not that many of the Israelis who perished on October 7 were later shown to have died from IDF “friendly fire,” resulting either from the fog of war or implementation of Israel’s Hannibal Directive, which authorizes killing one’s own rather than letting them be taken prisoner. Many of the young people killed at the Nova music festival were likely casualties of fire from IDF helicopter gunships; the burned-out hulks of their cars, which could not have been produced by Hamas’s light weaponry, strongly suggest as much.

Nor did it matter that 18 months ago, on January 24, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that there was “a real and imminent risk” of genocide occurring in Gaza and mandated six provisional measures aimed at “preserving … the right of the Palestinians in Gaza to be protected from acts of genocide.” The court imposed further measures on March 28 and May 24. All were simply ignored by Israel, with the open or tacit support of the United States and Israel’s other Western allies, including Canada.

It is difficult to think of a more blatant snub to the international rule of law—unless it be the howls of Western outrage that greeted the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC) last November 21 for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for “the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare; and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.” The U.S. has now instituted sanctions against the judges who authorized the arrest warrants.

Only one thing mattered. For 20 months it sufficed to invoke “the deadliest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust” to forestall further debate. In democracies that pride themselves on their respect for freedom of expression and human rights, anyone who questioned Israel’s narrative, from journalists, artists, actors and novelists to sports commentators, children’s entertainers, and rap musicians, were vilified as “antisemites,” harassed by the agencies of the state, and “canceled” from the public domain.

If not now, when?
One of the first signs that this unholy consensus among the major Western powers might at long last be cracking was a striking shift in tone in some leading British newspapers.

What appears to have tipped the scales this time were warnings of imminent famine in Gaza resulting from the total blockade on supplies of food, water, power, and medicine Israel had imposed on the Strip since March 2, two weeks before it unilaterally broke the truce it had agreed with Hamas in January and resumed its full-scale military offensive.

On May 4, the Guardian ran a lead editorial titled “Israel’s aid blockade of Gaza: hunger as a weapon of war,” which concluded:

What is shameful is that almost half the children in Gaza questioned in a study said that they wished to die. What is shameful is that so many civilians have been killed, and so many more pushed to the brink of starvation. What is shameful is that this has, indeed, been allowed to happen.

The next day the Daily Mirror, historically the most left-wing of Britain’s tabloids, devoted its front page as well as two inside pages to a story by Defense Editor Chris Hughes titled “Horror in Gaza.” The headline read “OUR CHILDREN ARE STARVING.”

On May 6 the Financial Times—the most establishment of UK establishment papers—openly challenged Israel’s “self-defence” protestations in a powerful editorial headed “The west’s shameful silence on Gaza”:

Each new offensive makes it harder not to suspect that the ultimate goal of Netanyahu’s far-right coalition is to ensure Gaza is uninhabitable and drive Palestinians from their land. For two months, Israel has blocked delivery of all aid into the strip. Child malnutrition rates are rising, the few functioning hospitals are running out of medicine, and warnings of starvation and disease are growing louder. Yet the U.S. and European countries that tout Israel as an ally that shares their values have issued barely a word of condemnation. They should be ashamed of their silence, and stop enabling Netanyahu to act with impunity.

Martin Sandbu’s June 2 op-ed, which argued that “it is in Europe’s interest to impose sanctions on Israel,” is something the FT would never have countenanced previously.

“End the deafening silence on Gaza—it is time to speak up,” proclaimed a lead editorial in The Independent on May 10, explaining that times had changed:

The world was stunned by the horrific Hamas atrocity of October 7, 2023, in southern Israel, in which 1,200 people were killed and 251 hostages seized—the youngest just nine months old. Despite its fierce retaliation raising immediate alarm, Israel found international backing for the right to defend itself…

But now any initial moral justification for continuing to prosecute the war 18 months on has been lost—and the disgust we once reserved for Hamas militants transferred to the brutal and relentless assaults by the Israel Defense Forces and the humanitarian disaster caused by its blockade.


Ramming its message home with a picture of hungry Palestinian children, the next day’s Independent devoted its entire front page to Gaza, calling upon “Britain and its allies to force Israel to end a cruel war that… has long since lost any moral justification.”

“The unfolding famine in Gaza is an obscenity the world must no longer tolerate,” the Independent again thundered on May 29.

It is an outrage that Israel, the occupying power ignoring its obligations to treat civilians properly, should behave in this manner; it is an even greater act of shame that the world should continue to tolerate it.

On May 8 the Economist published an article suggesting that the Gaza Health Ministry death toll was a significant undercount and that “between 77,000 and 109,000 Gazans have been killed, 4-5% of the territory’s pre-war population,” and the lead editorial demanded that “The war in Gaza must end.” Even Rupert Murdoch’s reliably pro-Israel Times carried an editorial titled “Israel’s friends cannot be blind to suffering in Palestine.”

On May 11, the Guardian broke the taboo on the dreaded G-word, whose application to Gaza by correspondents or interviewees the BBC, the New York Times, and CNN have all done their utmost to ban, asking:

Now [Israel] plans a Gaza without Palestinians. What is this, if not genocidal? When will the U.S. and its allies act to stop the horror, if not now?

The lawyers and the literati weigh in
On May 26, more than 800 UK legal professionals published a letter to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer asserting that Israel’s actions in Gaza constituted war crimes, crimes against humanity, and possible genocide. They went on to demand that the UK government honour the ICC warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant, impose sanctions, and trigger the suspension of Israel’s UN membership by invoking Article 6 of the UN Charter.

These were not Donald Trump’s “radical left lunatic” judges and lawyers. Signatories included former Supreme Court justices Lady Hale, Lord Sumption, and Lord Wilson; former Court of Appeal judges Sir Stephen Sedley, Sir Anthony Hooper, and Sir Alan Moses; and more than 70 King’s Counsel, including former chairs of the Bar Council of England and Wales, the Criminal Bar Association, and the Bar of Northern Ireland.

Two days later, 380 writers from England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland issued a statement begging “the peoples of the world to join us in ending our collective silence and inaction in the face of horror.” Among the self-styled “Writers for Gaza” were Ian McEwan, Hanif Kureshi, Geoff Dyer, Jeannette Winterton, Pico Iyer, Russell T. Davis, and Zadie Smith, all eminent figures in British cultural life.

Pointing out that “The use of the words ‘genocide’ or ‘acts of genocide’ to describe what is happening in Gaza is no longer debated by international legal experts or human rights organizations”—the letter referenced Amnesty International, Médecins Sans Frontières, Human Rights Watch, the International Federation for Human Rights, and the United Nations Human Rights Council—the writers’ condemnation of Israel was unequivocal:

The term “genocide” is not a slogan. It carries legal, political, and moral responsibilities. Just as it is true to call the atrocities committed by Hamas against innocent civilians on October 7, 2023 crimes of war and crimes against humanity, so today it is true to name the attack on the people of Gaza an atrocity of genocide, with crimes of war and crimes against humanity, committed daily by the Israel Defence Forces, at the command of the government of the State of Israel.

The writers went on to demand an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted distribution of aid to Gaza through the UN, with the imposition of sanctions if Israel refused to comply.

While musician Brian Eno and historian William Dalrymple have repeatedly called out Israeli crimes over the last 20 months, the same cannot be said for all of the letter’s signatories. Many had remained silent up to now, and some have shifted their positions.

Zadie Smith, for example, copped a lot of social media flak for having described the language of student protestors in a May 2024 New Yorker article as “weapons of mass destruction” while refusing to take sides on Gaza.

To be fair, she had hardly represented Hamas’s and Israel’s crimes as comparable in scale:

The monstrous and brutal mass murder of more than eleven hundred people, the majority of them civilians, dozens of them children, on October 7th, has been followed by the monstrous and brutal mass murder (at the time of writing) of a reported fourteen thousand five hundred children. And many more human beings besides…

Are these instances of better late than never? Or are they, as some have argued, efforts to launder reputations while there is still time, to escape charges of complicity in what is increasingly being recognized as a genocide? As Omar El Akkad grimly predicted in his book of the same title, One Day, Everyone Will Always Have Been Against This.

Bringing up in the rear, the politicians
Other public figures have also been having second thoughts on Gaza. UK broadcaster Piers Morgan recently told Mehdi Hasan:

Listen, you and I have talked about this war in Gaza ever since it started, this phase of the 75-year conflict. I have resisted going as far as you have done in your criticism of the Israeli government. I resist no more.

Former U.S. State Department spokesman Matthew Miller, who made himself notorious for his smirking defense of Israeli actions under the Biden administration, admitted in a Sky News interview that “I don’t think it’s a genocide, but I think, I think it is without a doubt true that Israel has committed war crimes.”

Asked why he lied about this at the time, Miller responded:

When you’re at the podium, you’re not expressing your personal opinion.

You’re expressing the conclusions of the United States government. The United States government had not concluded that they committed war crimes, still have not concluded [that].


In other words, he was only following orders. This defence didn’t wash at the Nuremberg Trials, and is unlikely to wash today should Miller—or anybody else who has helped Israel carry out or cover up its crimes in Gaza—find themselves in the ICC dock in the Hague.

No doubt this consideration is beginning to weigh with the West’s political leaders, some of whom now appear to be in an unseemly rush to cover their asses.

In October 2024, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy—who like Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a long-standing members of Labour Friends of Israel—told Parliament that to speak of genocide in Gaza “undermines the seriousness of that term,” which he wanted to reserve for “when millions of people lost their lives in crises like Rwanda, the Second World War and the Holocaust.”

This is a definition that not only (willfully?) misinterprets international law but conflicts with the British government’s own stance on genocides in Srbenica and Myanmar.

Questioned as to whether Lammy spoke for the government, Keir Starmer responded with a characteristic deflection:

It would be wise to start a question like that by a reference to what happened in October of last year [2023]. I am well aware of the definition of genocide, and that is why I have never described this or referred to it as genocide.

He cannot do so, of course, without laying open both his government and his person to criminal charges of complicity in the most heinous of all crimes.

All the more significant then, that David Lammy told Parliament on March 17 that though Israel “quite rightly must defend its own security,” its latest blockade was a “breach of international law.” The next day Starmer publicly rebuked his foreign secretary for saying the quiet bit out loud (“The government is not an international court, and, therefore, it is up to courts to make judgments”), but nevertheless conceded that “Israel’s actions in Gaza are at clear risk of breaching international humanitarian law.”

Several senior British Conservative MPs are also seemingly having a change of heart on Gaza. On May 6 Kit Malthouse organized a letter to Keir Starmer signed by seven MPs and six members of the House of Lords calling upon the government to stand “against indefinite occupation” and “reinforce international law,” and recognize the state of Palestine “as a necessary step to reinforce international law and diplomacy.” That same day, Conservative MP Mark Pritchard told the House of Commons,

I have supported Israel, pretty much at all costs. But today, I want to say that I got it wrong.

Against this background, Keir Starmer for the UK, Emmanuel Macron for France, and Mark Carney for Canada issued an unusually strongly worded statement on May 19 threatening that “If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response.”

Though the three leaders did not—for perhaps obvious reasons—use the word genocide, they left no doubt as to their disgust at Israel’s “egregious actions”:

The Israeli Government’s denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks breaching International Humanitarian Law. We condemn the abhorrent language used recently by members of the Israeli Government, threatening that, in their despair at the destruction of Gaza, civilians will start to relocate. Permanent forced displacement is a breach of international humanitarian law.

The statement went on to condemn “any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank … which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of both Israelis and Palestinians,” threatening that in this case, too,

We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions.

The following day David Lammy addressed the Commons again. “We are now entering a dark new phase in this conflict,” he told MPs:

Netanyahu’s Government plan to drive Gazans from their homes into a corner of the strip to the south and permit them a fraction of the aid that they need. Yesterday, Minister Smotrich even spoke of Israeli forces ‘cleansing’ Gaza, of ‘destroying what’s left’ and of resident Palestinians being ‘relocated to third countries’. We must call this what it is: it is extremism, it is dangerous, it is repellent, it is monstrous and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms… Israel’s plan is morally unjustifiable, wholly disproportionate and utterly counterproductive, and whatever Israeli Ministers claim, it is not the way to bring the hostages safely home.

Though Lammy’s speech was passionate, the accompanying actions were modest: the suspension of trade talks with Israel, which were stalled anyway, and a largely symbolic imposition of sanctions on a handful of settler extremists in the West Bank.

Are these indications that the rats are finally preparing to abandon Israel’s sinking ship? Or are they just cosmetic gestures, designed to cover up Western complicity in the Gaza genocide while doing nothing serious to stop it? Only time will tell. Unfortunately time is a luxury the starving people of Gaza do not have.

The official death toll in Gaza—Israel’s payback for the 1,139 deaths on October 7—now stands at nearly 55,000, the majority of them women and children. Where are those “concrete actions,” Mr. Starmer, Mr. Macron—Mr. Carney? As you convene for your G7 summit in Kananaskis, the world awaits.

Are you prepared to face down Donald Trump, who has thrown his full support behind Israel and is salivating at the prospect of America rebuilding an ethnically cleansed Gaza as the “Riviera of the Middle East”?

Three weeks have now passed since your declaration of intent, and so far we have seen nothing but words.

It’s only words
In the contentious New Yorker article mentioned earlier, Zadie Smith’s intent was to draw attention to “the use of words to justify bloody murder, to flatten and erase unbelievably labyrinthine histories, and to deliver the atavistic pleasure of violent simplicity to the many people who seem to believe that merely by saying something they make it so.”

Under other circumstances, I would be the first to agree that in this case as in others, “language and rhetoric are and always have been weapons of mass destruction”:

It is no doubt a great relief to say the word “Hamas” as if it purely and solely described a terrorist entity. A great relief to say “There is no such thing as the Palestinian people” as they stand in front of you. A great relief to say “Zionist colonialist state” and accept those three words as a full and unimpeachable definition of the state of Israel, not only under the disastrous leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu but at every stage of its long and complex history, and also to hear them as a perfectly sufficient description of every man, woman, and child who has ever lived in Israel or happened to find themselves born within it. It is perhaps because we know these simplifications to be impossible that we insist upon them so passionately.

But these are not other circumstances. And however belatedly, more people like Zadie Smith—and even a few politicians—may be waking up to that fact. This is not a time for nuance.

Ta-Nehisi Coates probably said it best when, commenting on the part played by Biden’s Gaza policy in Kamala Harris’s electoral defeat by Donald Trump, he argued:

We are at a moment right now where people are asking themselves why can’t the Democratic Party defend [Trump’s] assault on democracy… and I would submit to you that if you can’t draw the line at genocide, you probably can’t draw the line at democracy.

The “labyrinthine” complexity of the Israel-Palestine conflict—whose century-long history includes plentiful atrocities on both sides—cannot be used to obscure the simple moral truth that lies at the foundation of all international humanitarian law.

It is necessary to condemn war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide wherever and whenever they occur—irrespective of the identity of their perpetrators or the justice of the causes in whose name they are committed.

If we forget this, the genocide in Gaza will point the way to a future without law for the whole of humanity, and Western democracies’ selfishness, cowardice, and indifference will have let it.

https://mronline.org/2025/06/09/one-day ... inst-this/#

******

Israel seizes Gaza Freedom Flotilla, detains activists

Israeli navy boats and quadcopter drones surrounded the humanitarian aid vessel as it was trying to break the siege on Gaza

News Desk

JUN 9, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Israeli Foreign Ministry/X)

Israeli forces intercepted the Gaza Freedom Flotilla’s Madleen vessel in international waters early on 9 June as it was approaching Gaza to break the siege, seizing the boat and detaining the 12 activists on board.

“The ship was unlawfully boarded, its unarmed civilian crew abducted, and its life-saving cargo – including baby formula, food, and medical supplies – confiscated,” the Gaza Freedom Flotilla said.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry announced in a statement on Monday that its forces took control of the “selfie yacht” and towed it to the port of Ashdod. “The passengers are expected to return to their home countries.”

“There are ways to deliver aid to the Gaza Strip – they do not involve Instagram selfies. The tiny amount of aid that was on the yacht and not consumed by the ‘celebrities’ will be transferred to Gaza through real humanitarian channels,” the Israeli Foreign Ministry added.

The Foreign Ministry also said that the “show is over,” publishing footage of the detained activists being provided water and sandwiches while being transported to Ashdod port.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz praised the takeover of the ship, and said he ordered the army to force the activists to watch a video of Hamas’s “atrocities” on 7 October, 2023.

“It’s appropriate that Greta the antisemite and her Hamas-supporting friends should see exactly who is the terror group Hamas that they support and act on behalf of, what atrocious acts they carried out on women, the elderly, and kids, and who Israel is fighting for its defense against,” he said.

Video footage of the moment Israeli forces advanced toward the vessel circulated on social media, showing the activists holding their hands up.

Israeli quadcopter drones and navy vessels surrounded the Madleen during the interception.

The Madleen was carrying a meager but ‘symbolic’ amount of humanitarian aid as a protest and a humanitarian effort, described by the organizers as a last-ditch attempt to urge world governments to take immediate action and restore safe channels for delivering essential aid and medical supplies.

The Left group in the European Parliament condemned Israel’s seizure of the Madleen aid ship as a “blatant violation of international law.” The political group, which includes 46 lawmakers, said the arrest of the crew and confiscation of humanitarian supplies is part of a broader strategy to “starve and massacre Palestinians in Gaza while hiding Israeli war crimes from the world.”

In a statement, it urged the EU, UN, and international community to condemn the detention, demand the crew’s unconditional release, and ensure unimpeded aid entry into Gaza. “Solidarity is not a crime, genocide is,” it added.

In a post on social media, UN special rapporteur on human rights in Palestine, Francesca Albanese, said, “Madleen's journey may have ended, but the mission isn't over. Every Mediterranean port must send boats with aid and solidarity to Gaza.”

Israel’s blockade of Gaza has resulted in the spread of famine across the strip.

A joint report by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Food Program (WFP) released on 5 June states that over one million Palestinians may face fatal levels of starvation by mid-July.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-se ... -activists
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Wed Jun 11, 2025 2:51 pm

Chris Hedges: The Last Days of Gaza
June 10, 2025

The genocide is almost complete. When it is concluded it will have exposed the moral bankruptcy of Western civilization.

Image
The Last Piece – by Mr. Fish.

By Chris Hedges
ScheerPost

This is the end. The final blood-soaked chapter of the genocide.

It will be over soon. Weeks. At most.

Two million people are camped out amongst the rubble or in the open air. Dozens are killed and wounded daily from Israeli shells, missiles, drones, bombs and bullets.

They lack clean water, medicine and food. They have reached a point of collapse. Sick. Injured. Terrified. Humiliated. Abandoned. Destitute. Starving. Hopeless.

In the last pages of this horror story, Israel is sadistically baiting starving Palestinians with promises of food, luring them to the narrow and congested nine-mile ribbon of land that borders Egypt. Israel and its cynically named Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), allegedly funded by Israel’s Ministry of Defense and the Mossad, is weaponizing starvation.

It is enticing Palestinians to southern Gaza the way the Nazis enticed starving Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto to board trains to the death camps. The goal is not to feed the Palestinians. No one seriously argues there is enough food or aid hubs. The goal is to cram Palestinians into heavily guarded compounds and deport them.

What comes next? I long ago stopped trying to predict the future. Fate has a way of surprising us. But there will be a final humanitarian explosion in Gaza’s human slaughterhouse. We see it with the surging crowds of Palestinians fighting to get a food parcel, which has resulted in Israeli and U.S. private contractors shooting dead at least 130 and wounding over seven hundred others in the first eight days of aid distribution.

We see it with Benjamin Netanyahu’s arming ISIS-linked gangs in Gaza that loot food supplies. Israel, which has eliminated hundreds of employees with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), doctors, journalists, civil servants and police in targeted assassinations, has orchestrated the implosion of civil society.

I suspect Israel will facilitate a breach in the fence along the Egyptian border. Desperate Palestinians will stampede into the Egyptian Sinai. Maybe it will end some other way. But it will end soon. There is not much more Palestinians can take.

We — full participants in this genocide — will have achieved our demented goal of emptying Gaza and expanding Greater Israel. We will bring down the curtain on the live-streamed genocide. We will have mocked the ubiquitous university programs of Holocaust studies, designed, it turns out, not to equip us to end genocides, but deify Israel as an eternal victim licensed to carry out mass slaughter.

The mantra of never again is a joke. The understanding that when we have the capacity to halt genocide and we do not, we are culpable, does not apply to us. Genocide is public policy. Endorsed and sustained by our two ruling parties.

There is nothing left to say. Maybe that is the point. To render us speechless. Who does not feel paralyzed? And maybe, that too, is the point. To paralyze us. Who is not traumatized? And maybe that too was planned. Nothing we do, it seems, can halt the killing. We feel defenseless. We feel helpless. Genocide as spectacle.

I have stopped looking at the images. The rows of little shrouded bodies. The decapitated men and women. Families burned alive in their tents. The children who have lost limbs or are paralyzed. The chalky death masks of those pulled from under the rubble. The wails of grief. The emaciated faces. I can’t.

This genocide will haunt us. It will echo down history with the force of a tsunami. It will divide us forever. There is no going back.

Image
Palestinians under the rubble in 2023 after Israeli airstrike of homes in the Gaza Strip. (Ashraf Amra /United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East/ Wikimedia Commons /CC BY-SA 4.0)

And how will we remember? By not remembering.

Once it is over, all those who supported it, all those who ignored it, all those who did nothing, will rewrite history, including their personal history. It was hard to find anyone who admitted to being a Nazi in post-war Germany, or a member of the Klu Klux Klan once segregation in the southern United States ended.

A nation of innocents. Victims even. It will be the same. We like to think we would have saved Anne Frank. The truth is different. The truth is, crippled by fear, nearly all of us will only save ourselves, even at the expense of others. But that is a truth that is hard to face. That is the real lesson of the Holocaust. Better it be erased.

In his book One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, Omar El Akkad writes:

“Should a drone vaporize some nameless soul on the other side of the planet, who among us wants to make a fuss? What if it turns out they were a terrorist? What if the default accusation proves true, and we by implication be labeled terrorist sympathizers, ostracized, yelled at? It is generally the case that people are most zealously motivated by the worst plausible thing that could happen to them.

For some, the worst plausible thing might be the ending of their bloodline in a missile strike. Their entire lives turned to rubble and all of it preemptively justified in the name of fighting terrorists who are terrorists by default on account of having been killed. For others, the worst plausible thing is being yelled at.”


You can see my interview with El Akkad here.

You cannot decimate a people, carry out saturation bombing over 20 months to obliterate their homes, villages and cities, massacre tens of thousands of innocent people, set up a siege to ensure mass starvation, drive them from land where they have lived for centuries and not expect blowback.

The genocide will end. The response to the reign of state terror will begin. If you think it won’t you know nothing about human nature or history. The killing of two Israeli diplomats in Washington and the attack against supporters of Israel at a protest in Boulder, Colorado, are only the start.

Chaim Engel, who took part in the uprising at the Nazis’ Sobibor death camp in Poland, described how, armed with a knife, he attacked a guard in the camp.

“It’s not a decision,” Engel explained years later. “You just react, instinctively you react to that, and I figured, ‘Let us to do, and go and do it.’ And I went. I went with the man in the office and we killed this German. With every jab, I said, ‘That is for my father, for my mother, for all these people, all the Jews you killed.’”

Image
The Sobibor extermination camp gate in the spring of 1943. The pine branches, braided into the fence to make it difficult to see in from the outside. (Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain)

Does anyone expect Palestinians to act differently? How are they to react when Europe and the United States, who hold themselves up as the vanguards of civilization, backed a genocide that butchered their parents, their children, their communities, occupied their land and blasted their cities and homes into rubble? How can they not hate those who did this to them?

What message has this genocide imparted not only to Palestinians, but to all in the Global South?

It is unequivocal. You do not matter. Humanitarian law does not apply to you. We do not care about your suffering, the murder of your children. You are vermin. You are worthless. You deserve to be killed, starved and dispossessed. You should be erased from the face of the earth.

“To preserve the values of the civilized world, it is necessary to set fire to a library,” El Akkad writes:

“To blow up a mosque. To incinerate olive trees. To dress up in the lingerie of women who fled and then take pictures. To level universities. To loot jewelry, art, food. Banks. To arrest children for picking vegetables. To shoot children for throwing stones.


To parade the captured in their underwear. To break a man’s teeth and shove a toilet brush in his mouth. To let combat dogs loose on a man with Down syndrome and then leave him to die. Otherwise, the uncivilized world might win.”

There are people I have known for years who I will never speak to again. They know what is happening. Who does not know? They will not risk alienating their colleagues, being smeared as an antisemite, jeopardizing their status, being reprimanded or losing their jobs.

They do not risk death, the way Palestinians do. They risk tarnishing the pathetic monuments of status and wealth they spent their lives constructing. Idols. They bow down before these idols. They worship these idols. They are enslaved by them.

At the feet of these idols lie tens of thousands of murdered Palestinians.

https://consortiumnews.com/2025/06/10/c ... s-of-gaza/

******

Image

After Denying Massacring Civilians Seeking Aid, Israel Routinely Massacres Civilians Seeking Aid

Israel’s own actions since June 1 have proved that Israeli forces do indeed deliberately fire upon starving civilians seeking humanitarian aid. Israel lied. Again.

Caitlin Johnstone
June 11, 2025

At the beginning of this month, Israel and its apologists ferociously denied claims that IDF troops had fired upon civilians seeking aid at a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) site, killing 31 people.

On the second of June, Israeli forces again opened fire on civilians seeking aid in Gaza, killing three people and injuring more than 30.

On June 3, Israeli forces again opened fire on civilians seeking aid, reportedly killing at least 27 people.

The US/Israeli-backed GHF temporarily suspended operations after this spate of mass shootings.

On June 8, Israeli forces again fired upon civilians seeking aid at two separate distribution points in Gaza, killing twelve.

On June 9, Israel and Israeli-backed forces opened fire on a crowd at an aid site in Gaza, killing 14.

And on June 10, at least 36 people were reported killed and 208 wounded when Israeli forces again fired on crowds seeking aid in Gaza.


Since May 27, some 160 people have reportedly been killed in massacres at these GHF sites, which people in Gaza are reportedly beginning to refer to as a “death trap”.

Think about how desperate and starving you’d have to be before you’d go seek food from people who you know will probably start spraying the crowd with bullets at some point. This really gives you an idea of how badly the people of Gaza have been suffering.

But, again, at the beginning of the month, Israel and its spinmeisters were crying antisemitic blood libel at the very suggestion that IDF troops would fire upon people trying to obtain food.

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs published a deceitful video clip which it falsely claimed showed Hamas members, not the IDF, firing on the crowd.

Netanyahu advisor Caroline Glick and Israel’s “Minister of Diaspora and Combating Antisemitism” Amichai Chikli both called the reporting on the June 1 massacre a “blood libel”.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt falsely accused the BBC of peddling Hamas propaganda for reporting on the June 1 massacre.


Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennet shared a video clip of people in Gaza not being shot at some point and claimed this proves nobody was shot at the specified incident on June 1, saying “When it’s about Israel, all slander works.”

The Jerusalem Post published an article titled “Media blood libel over alleged Gaza aid shooting will have far-reaching repercussions.”

Israel’s official Twitter account called the reporting “Hamas propaganda”.

The Washington Post bowed to pressure and retracted its article on the June 1 massacre, saying it didn’t “give proper weight to Israel’s denial and gave improper certitude about what was known about any Israeli role in the shootings.”

Then, a few days later, CNN published a report based on extensive video analysis and eyewitness interviews which found that all evidence, contrary to Israel’s claims, “points to the Israeli military opening fire on crowds of Palestinians as they tried to make their way to the fenced enclosure to get food.”

Even without the CNN report, Israel’s own actions since June 1 have proved that Israeli forces do indeed deliberately fire upon starving civilians seeking humanitarian aid. Israel lied. Again.

Which should come as no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention to Israel’s mass atrocities in Gaza. This is after all the same genocidal state which indignantly objected to claims that it would ever bomb a medical facility after an explosion at the Al-Ahli Arab Baptist Hospital in October 2023, only to bomb that exact same hospital many times thereafter while deliberately destroying Gaza’s entire healthcare infrastructure.

One of the craziest phrases you can possibly utter in the year 2025 is “Let’s give Israel the benefit of the doubt on this one.” They’ve been caught lying so many times that there is no reason to take any of their denials seriously. You don’t get to ban journalists from Gaza while getting caught lying about your actions over and over again and then have people give any weight to your denials of reported atrocities. That’s not a thing.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2025/06 ... eking-aid/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Jun 12, 2025 2:59 pm

Gaza Death Toll Mounts: Scores Killed as Aid Centers Become Death Traps
June 11, 2025

Image
From hospitals, to tents, to flour and now to aid massacres, 'Israel' continues to innovate and escalate its genocide not only in Gaza but throughout Palestine. Photo: Quds News Network.

Eyewitnesses described scenes of panic as drones dropped grenades and fired bullets at densely populated areas across Gaza.

At least 44 Palestinians were killed and hundreds more wounded across the territory since dawn on Monday, amid relentless Israeli attacks and growing outrage over the role of US-backed aid operations, Al-Jazeera reported, citing health authorities in Gaza.

In the southern Gaza Strip, sources at the Nasser Medical Complex reported that 14 Palestinians were killed near aid centers associated with an American company operating in Rafah.

These deaths add to a growing number of casualties linked to the so-called “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation,” an organization that has drawn fierce criticism from Palestinian authorities and local media.

In a statement, the Government Media Office in Gaza said that this entity—funded and supported by both the United States and Israel—has now been directly responsible for the deaths of 130 Palestinians and the injury of over 1,000 others.

The office accused the group of “spreading falsehoods,” including unsubstantiated claims that Palestinian resistance groups are threatening their workers and obstructing aid deliveries. It stressed that any group implementing military agendas under the guise of humanitarian work “cannot be considered a relief organization.”


Elsewhere in central Gaza, Al-Awda Hospital in the Nuseirat refugee camp reported that more than 30 people were injured when Israeli drones attacked crowds of civilians gathered near an aid center west of Rafah.

Eyewitnesses described scenes of panic as drones dropped grenades and fired bullets at densely populated areas where families had assembled in desperate hope of securing food and supplies.

As Israeli bombardment continues across the Strip, hospitals remain overwhelmed. In the northern part of Gaza, medical staff at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City confirmed the death of a woman and injuries to others following artillery shelling in the Saftawi area.

A separate medical source said that a child was killed and another wounded in shelling near the Tawam roundabout in the city’s northwest.

The eastern neighborhoods of Shujaiya and Zaytoun also came under heavy fire. According to sources at the Baptist Hospital, 11 Palestinians were killed there since dawn. Residents say the shelling has been nonstop, reducing entire residential blocks to rubble and trapping families inside.

Palestinian Red Crescent crews reported that a number of victims were recovered from under the debris following artillery attacks on Old Gaza Street in Jabalia al-Balad, in the north of the Strip.

The wounded and the dead were taken to Al-Shifa Medical Complex, already operating beyond capacity due to the catastrophic humanitarian conditions.

In Khan Yunis, a medical source at Nasser Hospital confirmed the deaths of seven Palestinians, most of them children, in Israeli drone attacks on displaced persons’ tents in the Al-Mawasi area. The area had previously been designated as a “safe zone” by Israeli authorities, where thousands of families had sought refuge after being displaced from their homes.



Adding to the toll, the Ministry of Interior and National Security in Gaza announced that an Israeli strike targeted a police unit in the Nuseirat refugee camp, killing an officer, a policeman, and a civilian.

The Ministry condemned the attack, stating that the force had been carrying out its duty to protect civilian property and prevent theft in the chaos left by months of displacement and destruction. It stressed that Israeli aggression would not deter civil institutions from continuing their work.

In its latest update, the Ministry of Health in Gaza said that 47 Palestinians were killed and 388 injured in the last 24 hours alone. Since Israel launched its war on Gaza in October 2023, the total death toll has reached 54,927, with more than 226,600 others wounded.

These numbers are expected to rise, as many remain trapped under rubble and entire neighborhoods continue to be subjected to intense bombing, drone fire, and artillery shelling.

As international outrage grows, Palestinian officials continue to warn that the combination of military bombardment, starvation, and manipulated aid delivery is deepening the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. According to the Government Media Office, so-called aid initiatives backed by Washington and Tel Aviv are not only failing to relieve the crisis but are actively contributing to it.

https://orinocotribune.com/gaza-death-t ... ath-traps/

******

Image

Israel as a tool of U.S. imperialism
By Brian M. Napoletano (Posted Jun 03, 2025)

This is an English translation of an essay provided in Spanish to [Materialismos: Cuadernos de Marxismo y Psicoanálisis] (https://materialismo.hypotheses.org/actual) for a special issue on Palestine.

A number of notable parallels run through the histories of Israel and the United States. Both are settler-colonial states founded on the genocide of Indigenous peoples on the part of Western Europeans. Both, moreover, have sought to significantly expand their borders vía military conquest, and to dominate their neighbors. Internally, both economies are marked by some of the highest levels of polarization among members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, rendering per-capita metrics largely inaccurate. Both societies are also extremely militaristic and continue to be riven by institutionalized and systemic racism, while claiming to champion human rights and democracy. Undergirding these internal fractures is a sophisticated system of propaganda and indoctrination, including educational institutions and the commercial news media, to which the peoples of both countries are subjected. These similarities are important factors when accounting for the historical relationship between the two states, although their differences are of equal, if not greater, significance.

Chief among these differences is the very distinct positions the two states occupy in the capitalist world system. The United States is widely recognized as the world’s primary imperial power, whereas Israel is more of a client than a partner of the United States. Despite representing a potent military force within the Southwest Asia-North Africa region (SWANA)—more widely known by its European colonial label of the “Middle East”—Israel remains extremely dependent on its sponsor for military, economic, and political support. This combination of comparative military strength and objective dependency makes Israel a highly effective tool of U.S. imperialism.

Israel’s importance in this respect is closely tied to the strategic importance of SWANA more broadly, which is difficult to overstate. As the meeting point between the continents of Africa, Asia, and Europe, SWANA represents a vital hub of worldwide transportation and trade. According to the [International Monetary Fund] (https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2 ... obal-Trade), roughly 15 percent of global maritime trade passes through the Suez Canal alone, which is only one of several vital transportation nodes the region hosts, the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait being widely regarded as the other two most essential passages. Moreover, the United States recently began pursuing a large infrastructure project to establish a [trade corridor] (https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/11/middleea ... -mime-intl) that passes from India through the Persian Gulf and then Israel in a move to counter what it perceives as the threat posed by China’s Belt and Road Initiative. In addition to container shipping and other trade, vast proportions of the world’s petroleum and natural gas are moved through these corridors, as many of these resources originate in the region.

SWANA’s vast reserves of petroleum, of course, are widely recognized as the primary factor underlying the region’s strategic importance. In 2012, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Secretary General Abdalla S. El-Badri [reported] (https://www.opec.org/speech-detail/228- ... -2012.html) that the eight OPEC member countries in ASWAN (Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) hold roughly 58 percent and 43 percent of the world’s proven crude oil and natural gas reserves respectively. While access to the region’s oil wealth is of immediate importance to those nations dependent on it—specifically, Western Europe and Japan—control over this wealth carries with it both significant economic (in the form of massive profits for energy corporations with preferential access to exploit these resources) and geopolitical (a de facto lever of influence, if not control, over countries dependent on these resources) benefits. Thus, while the United States does not rely on SWANA to satisfy its own demand for petroleum, it nonetheless regards control over this region as a key strategic objective.

This is because, as its own military doctrine openly states, Washington seeks to assert itself as the absolute hegemon of the world capitalist system, exercising unrivaled control over every region of the world. This goal of world domination is objectively irrational, but follows logically from the limited rationality of the capitalist system. As a system of social-metabolic control, capital is constitutionally antagonistic, placing the demands of compound accumulation—commonly referred to as economic growth—in increasing opposition to the necessities of social reproduction and the interests of vast segments of the population. Rather than the universal prosperity originally promised by the champions of neoliberal “globalization,” this antagonistic way of organizing individual societies has been replicated by a hierarchical order at the inter-state level, the chief axis of which has been an imperial core composed of the United States, dominant Western European powers, and Japan, counterpoised to a heterogeneous periphery subjected to varying levels of underdevelopment, exploitation, expropriation, and domination. As the abject failure of appeals to notions of global environmental governance to seriously address climate change or any other dimensions of the Anthropocene crisis amply attest, not even the exigencies of human survival are sufficient to override the accumulation imperative that places each state, like each individual, in a perpetual war of each against all.

Various politicians, intellectuals, and media figures beholden to the ideology of capital accumulation continue to assert that the countries of the periphery can achieve similar levels of economic development, material wealth, and self-determination to those of the core by adhering to the policies prescribed by Washington and promulgated throughout the dominant international financial institutions, though empirical evidence to date has consistently falsified such claims. Rather, the core has systematically retained unequal relationships with the countries of periphery, denying them any meaningful degree of autocentric development or self-determination. This has allowed the monopolistic corporations that have dominated the capitalist system since the twentieth century and situated within the core to enhance their profitability by using the periphery as a source of inexpensive labor, raw materials, and markets for profitable investment and excess commodities. With notable exceptions, the domestic capitalists and politicians of the periphery have accepted domination by the core and content themselves with siphoning off a greater or lesser share of the profits flowing into the core.

In a very fundamental sense, therefore, imperialism is intrinsic to capital accumulation at a world scale. As such, instances where nationalist sentiments or desires for autonomy from the dictates of worldwide accumulation begin to take root within the periphery generally evoke intense hostility and extreme reactions from the rulers of the core, who are frequently aided by those domestic interests that benefit from foreign domination. Together, the threats of intervention and benefits of subservience generally keep the ruling strata of peripheral countries in line, such that moves towards more autocentric development and national self-determination require the initiative of popular forces, often organized around a socialist project. Combating such popular forces is a primary function of the vast amount of armaments and other military support the core supplies—to the profit of the executives and investors in the military-industrial complex, and at the expense of the general public whose tax revenues subsidize this investment in the means of destruction—to the periphery.

Breaking with this international order of hierarchical domination therefore represents a difficult challenge. Samir Amin has articulated this problem as one of “delinking,” in the sense of subordinating external market and other relations to the imperatives of internal development. Containing, isolating, and crushing such initiatives for internal, popular development has consistently been the overriding priority of U.S. foreign policy, and those of its imperial allies. The Cold War prosecuted against the former Soviet Union, the violent counterinsurgency operations Washington and its allies have carried out around the world, and the numerous acts of military aggression that Washington itself has undertaken are all imbricated in this need to exterminate nationalist and other aspirations to self-determination within the periphery—as well as the often violent and authoritarian means used to crush internal dissent. A recent [report] (https://www.sipri.org/publications/2025 ... sfers-2024) by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute indicating that the United States alone was responsible for nearly half of all arms exports between 2020 and 2024, more than the next eight largest exporters combined, is ample testimony to the intrinsic link between militarism and imperialism.

This is the general context in which U.S. relations with Israel have developed. Israel, of course, began as a project of British colonialism after Britain and France set about dividing up the territory they plundered from the Ottoman Empire. When the United States took the helm of the imperial capitalist system after the second World War, it refined the mechanisms of European colonialism in SWANA—which primarily entailed a combination of puppet Arab rulers and extreme violence—by outsourcing responsibility for policing the region to reliable client states. In addition to mitigating to some degree the amount of direct retaliation to which the United States is exposed, this practice of operating vía client states bolsters the profitability of Lockheed Martin, RTX (Raytheon Technologies), Northrop Grumman, and other members of the aforementioned death-dealing industry.

Initially, the United States relied on Iran and Saudi Arabia as the two central pillars of its control over SWANA. Washington planners were impressed with the brutality and efficiency with which the Zionist movement began its ethnic cleansing of Palestine, and the extreme violence and humiliation it repeatedly inflicted on Arab nationalist and anti-colonial initiatives in 1948 and afterwards, however, and the U.S. government increasingly began turning to Israel as its key client in the region following the 1956 Suez Crisis/War, and the Israeli-Arab Wars in 1967 and 1973. Israel, with U.S. and European backing, emerged as the leading military (and sole nuclear) power in the region. The Iranian Revolution in 1979, brought about by a unique alignment of popular forces, effectively eliminated one of the two central pillars of U.S. control, enhancing Israel’s importance in this respect. More recent moves by Saudi Arabia to strengthen ties with Russia and China—both of which Washington regards as the chief impediments to its imperial ambitions—as the world moves in a more multipolar direction has further left Israel as one of the only reliably dependent clients in the region.

With the Zionist movement making Israel into a settler-colonial state with expansionary ambitions, the country remains extremely militarized and an important source of regional instability. Rather than detrimental, such instability is highly conducive to U.S. interests. On the one hand, this renders Israel extremely dependent on U.S. military and political support, reducing the risk of it forming regional alliances outside Washington’s control or forming strong ties with Russia or China. On the other hand, Israel’s antagonisms with its neighbors often provide useful pretexts for military assaults and other attacks on Arab or Muslim states that foster anti-colonial sentiments, show signs of moving towards pan-Arab nationalism, or threaten to become formidable regional powers.

Despite its repeated efforts to crush its anti-colonial ambitions, including multiple Israeli military assaults prompted or implicitly sanctioned by Washington, Iran has succeeded in consolidating itself as just the counter-hegemonic regional power that Washington planners fear. Moreover, Iran has lent material support to anti-colonial forces throughout the region. Washington, accordingly, views Iran as a grave threat and the chief barrier to its complete domination of SWANA, and has consistently pursued a restructuring of regional power dynamics. In 2007, General Wesley Clark [revealed] (http://www.democracynow.org/2007/3/2/ge ... ential_bid) that the illegal U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 was part of a plan by the Pentagon and the Bush Administration to overthrow seven countries in five years, with the invasion intended to move on to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and ultimately Iran. While that particular initiative proved unworkable due to determined anti-colonial resistance, Washington has certainly not abandoned the objective. It is worth noting in this context that, amid the savage assault on Gaza and resistance fighters throughout the region, Turkey, Israel, the United States, and other allies managed to successfully use Syrian opposition forces to overthrow the government of the Syrian Arab Republic on 8 December 2024. This was followed by brutal Israeli attacks on sites that could provide support to Palestinian resistance.

Israel’s assault on Gaza has brought both the general contours and elite disputes regarding Washington’s use of Israel into sharper relief. One prominent faction in this dispute has been advocates of the “realist” position, who view unconditional support for Israel as a liability to U.S. interests imposed by a powerful Israel Lobby in Washington. This faction suggests that Israel has diverted U.S. policy from a course more conducive to its interests in SWANA, and is responsible for undermining Washington’s esteem. This has prompted “neoconservative” members of the Israel Lobby to retaliate by emphasizing Israel’s strategic importance as a U.S. military base in the region and a threat to Iran, as well as appealing to shared values of “democracy” and “human rights.” Inasmuch as both Israel and the United States view democracy and human rights as completely dispensable when they interfere with strategic objectives of complete domination and subjugation of local populations, this is a valid point.

As a prominent voice in the U.S. foreign policy establishment, and increasingly an extension of the Israel Lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) provides useful insight into Washington’s perspective. As its point of departure, the CFR redefines regional order and security in SWANA as the feasible level of U.S. domination, and then designates Iran the primary source of disorder and insecurity, rendering US/NATO military interventionism virtually invisible. Accordingly, apart from occasional lamentations of Israeli excesses, the CFR has [praised] (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/middle-e ... iddle-east) Israel’s brutal campaign in Gaza and beyond for bringing “many of Iran’s allies to their knees” and lowering the bar for military strikes within Iranian territory. Perhaps intoxicated by the smell of blood, some voices within the CFR have advocated that the United States undertake [direct military action] (https://www.foreignaffairs.com/iran/last-chance-iran) against Iran, while others have suggested that the United States use the opportunity to focus on building a new regional order in which Iran is isolated and its influence severely diminished. Several of these voices have also called for concerted efforts to weaken Russian and Chinese ties with state or popular forces in the region, and instead bind as much of the region as possible to the United States economically and politically as well as militarily.

For his part, Donald Trump seems to be shifting some [US priorities] (https://www.counterfire.org/article/why ... -tel-aviv/) in the region, or perhaps out of the region. His administration appears to be seeking to strengthen ties with some traditional U.S. allies such as Saudi Arabia, with which Trump negotiated an arms deal worth $142 billion, and several of the Gulf states like Qatar. Much to Israel’s dismay, Trump also made a deal in Yemen to halt U.S. bombings in exchange for the Houthis halting attacks on U.S. ships, while leaving these forces free to continue attacks on Israel, and negotiated directly with Hamas to secure the release of Edan Alexander, the last remaining U.S. citizen among the hostages. Claiming that he was acting on a suggestion by Turkish president Recep Erdoğan, Trump furthermore eliminated all sanctions against Syria without mentioning the security assurances that Israel was pressing for—though it is also worth noting that the new Syrian president, former al Qaeda leader Ahmad al-Sharaa, does not seem to object to Israel’s illegal occupation of a large portion of Syrian territory. Most significant in terms of the Trump administration’s strategic priorities, however, are the reports that the administration is negotiating a deal that would eliminate sanctions against Iran in exchange for it halting any possible future nuclear weapons development by ending all high uranium enrichment (although Iran has not been pursuing nuclear development, and this would not constitute much of a concession on their part as they have long been seeking such an agreement), which would signal a definitive rejection of Israel’s calls for a military assault against Iran. That said, the Trump administration has continued the Biden administration’s supply of massive military aid, including some of the most lethal weapons used by Israel in its genocide in Gaza, and is even eliminating the relatively timid sanctions that that the Biden administration had placed on some extremist Israeli settlers. Trump undermined the ceasefire between Hamas and Israel by threatening the entire population of Gaza with death if Israeli hostages were not immediately released and proposed that the United States take ownership over Gaza and finalize its ethnic cleansing. The administration has reportedly approached Libya with a proposal to take up to one million Palestinians deported from Gaza. All of this indicates that Washington, under the Trump administration like the Biden administration before it, has been fully complicit in Tel Aviv’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank and the Zionist policy of settler colonialism.

Nevertheless, in line with its America First doctrine, the Trump administration appears to be seeking to minimize direct U.S. military commitments in the region and to obtain a sufficient degree of regional stability to shift resources and attention into intensifying Washington’s new Cold War against China, which has consistently been Trump’s primary foreign and military policy focus during both his administrations. As long as Israel’s attempts to wipe out the Palestinian people do not detract from the campaign against China, they are likely of little concern to the regime in Washington. Thus, while Trump “realists” may break ranks with “neoconservatives” in Washington who favor an immediate invasion of Iran, the America First policy with respect to Israel does not seem to differ significantly from previous U.S. policies.

Critical assessments have generally concurred that U.S. support for Israel derives more from strategic interests than the power of the Israel Lobby, which rather serves primarily to legitimize unconditional backing for Israeli aggression and demonize criticisms of Zionism or its genocidal project with allegations of anti-Semitism. The manner in which Trump sidelined Israel in several negotiations would also confirm this view, as it demonstrates that Washington can readily disregard Israel’s interests when these do not align with its own. The strategic importance of SWANA renders U.S. domination of the region virtually axiomatic, and inasmuch as Israel has consistently proven itself to be a useful asset in this respect, it is an asset to the empire. In addition to constantly threatening Iran, the Zionist state has assassinated popular figures who have promoted visions of Arab nationalism, humiliated Arab leaders who have pursued regional integration, and proven itself a useful partner to U.S. imperialism at a worldwide level by funneling U.S. support to reactionary counter-revolutionaries and dictators in Latin America and other parts of the world. As Max Ajl [notes] (https://doi.org/10.1177/22779760241228157), “throughout Latin America, Israel armed and trained genocidal anti-revolutionary counter-insurgency, from the Contras to Pinochet’s Chile to the sub-fascist junta in Argentina.” Thus, the strategic benefits of U.S. support for Israel are fairly well documented. Where critical assessments tend to diverge with the views of elites is over the legitimacy, desirability, rationality, and morality of U.S. domination of SWANA and the rest of the world, as well as the new Cold War against China.

Neoconservative analysts have acknowledged that Washington is actively encouraging Israel’s savage assault on Gaza, while anticipating that the regional instability this is creating will eventually provide an adequate pretext for direct military action against Iran. Realists argue that Washington views the ethnic cleansing of Palestine as a minor cost to ensuring stability in the region and Israel’s continued dependence on Washington. In either case, there is little doubt that U.S. elites view Israel as a reliable extension of their empire, a military base in SWANA (literally referred to by some as a giant aircraft carrier) that does not need to be staffed by U.S. soldiers. Certainly, whether the savage assault on Gaza was an Israeli or U.S. initiative, Washington has no qualms contemplating Israel’s genocidal eradication of the Palestinian people, even at the cost of bleeding credibility as a neutral third party to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Those familiar with the history of U.S. interventions around the world are well aware of the readiness with which U.S. rulers are willing to tolerate or even encourage genocide when it advances their interests, as Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, among others, have extensively documented. William Blum provides a stark account of the thinking of U.S. elites on this issue in his account of account of Washington’s role in counter-revolutions around the world, Killing Hope, suggesting that the architects of U.S. imperialism “are perhaps not so much immoral as they are amoral. It’s not that they take pleasure in causing so much death and suffering. It’s that they just don’t care … the same that could be said about a sociopath. As long as the death and suffering advance the agenda of the empire, as long as the right people and the right corporations gain wealth and power and privilege and prestige, as long as the death and suffering aren’t happening to them or people close to them … then they just don’t care about it happening to other people.”

The logical corollary to recognizing Israel as a sub-imperialist tool of U.S. empire is the reconceptualization of Palestinian and Iranian violence inflicted on Israel and its imperial sponsor as anti-colonial resistance, contrary to the characterization of this violence as nihilistic and criminal terrorism by the imperial powers. Franz Fanon has emphasized that counter-violence by the colonized is a necessary part of the struggle for national liberation and self-determination, without romanticizing such violence or denying its painful effects. Nor can anti-colonial violence necessarily be regarded as unambiguously criminal, despite the protestations of the colonial purveyors of far more extreme and indiscriminate violence and terrorism. As Fayez A. Sayegh, among countless other scholars, has argued, the right to pursue national self-determination through counter-aggression follows from the United Nations charter itself, and the right to resist colonial domination is widely recognized. While the tactics of violent resistance are subject to debate, blanket condemnations and categorical rejections of the violence of the oppressed, common to liberal discourse, amounts to a demand that the colonized surrender meekly to the colonizers and accept their extermination without opposition. One need not necessarily share the visions of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, or other anti-colonial movements, nor offer them unconditional support, to recognize their right to struggle for national self-determination and liberation, and to condition support for such movements accordingly. As the various demonstrations in defense of the Palestinian people around the world have shown, the general principle of self-determination and self-defense is widely recognized, although the legitimacy of violent resistance remains more ambiguous. Certainly, one way to simplify the situation would be to deny the colonizers access to the means of inflicting violence, which is largely what these demonstrations have focused on. This suggests that mass demonstrations, together with tactics such as South Africa’s case of genocide against Israel in the International Court of Justice and boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS), and other non-violent initiatives do not stand in diametrical opposition to violent resistance, but the two forms of resistance can function as complementary instruments of anti-colonial struggle.

Admittedly, support for national self-determination in SWANA, and violent resistance in particular, carries with it significant risks at the current juncture. Even before the return of Trump’s neofascist regime to the White House, the United States and various Western European powers reacted to the popular uprisings in support of Palestine with extreme oppression and have enacted highly authoritarian measures of control. Palantir CEO Alex Karp helpfully [explained] (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... hatgpt.com) the rationale underlying elite reactions to public resistance to genocide and mass murder quite succinctly when he cautioned that, “if we lose the intellectual debate, you will not be able to deploy any armies in the west ever.” In other words, Washington and its allies recognize that domestic anti-imperial movements pose a grave threat to the U.S. empire, and need to be eradicated.

Indeed, former president Joe Biden’s support for the oppression of activists and steadfast refusal to mitigate Israeli barbarism in Gaza earned him the nickname “Genocide Joe,” and helped to ensure his vice president Kamala Harris’s defeat by Trump in the presidential election, with large numbers of Arab and other voters refusing to back a candidate complicit in genocide. Nevertheless, the Trump administration elected in 2024 has given even more active support than its predecessor to repression of anti-genocide protesters. Large numbers of students believed to have been involved in campus protests have been arrested and (in the case of foreign students) deported. These actions are set within the context of a broader attack on both Muslims and Latin American migrants, and fit into a [neo-fascist] (https://monthlyreview.org/2017/04/01/ne ... ite-house/) pattern of crushing internal dissent while persecuting and encouraging violence against targeted minorities. While the level of state and para-state violence Trump is mobilizing exceeds that of recent U.S. history, his decision to include critics of Israeli settler colonialism among his targets is entirely consistent with a core principle of U.S. policy.

Conversely, the failure to actively support anti-colonial resistance in SWANA arguably carries even graver risks. At a basic individual and moral level, it indicates quiescence, or perhaps even complicity, in an extensively documented and internationally recognized act of genocide against the Palestinian people. At more practical levels, it signals that the principle of impunity for those too rich and powerful to face formal justice continues to prevail, and allows U.S. imperialism to continue without facing significant resistance. To be clear, the imperial project being pursued by the United States is not only contrary to principles of self-determination, liberty, and justice, but represents an existential threat to civilization, and possibly humanity itself. Continued U.S. and Western European control over SWANA helps to ensure that fossil capital remains entrenched in the world system despite the increasingly urgent need to curtail carbon emissions if the threat of catastrophic climate change is to be reduced. Moreover, the imperial ambitions of the United States are propelling it headlong into an increasingly dangerous new Cold War with China that could escalate into open warfare and even a nuclear exchange. As John Bellamy Foster [has warned] (https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index ... /view/6132), capitalist imperialism is moving humanity into a phase of open exterminism.

The people of Latin America are not entirely external to this struggle. As previously mentioned, Israel has repeatedly armed and supported genocidal and counter-revolutionary regimes in the Americas and elsewhere. Trump, for his part, has already, in his new administration, attempted to initiate coups in Venezuela and has declared his intent to strengthen sanctions and other forms of economic terrorism against Cuba. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has gone as far as to [assert] (https://www.state.gov/restoring-a-tough ... ba-policy/) that “the Cuban regime has long supported acts of international terrorism,” suggesting that any aggression against the island nation will be considered legitimate. Moreover, the dehumanization, enclosure, and imprisonment of Palestinians, together with the targeting of Israeli Arabs, closely resembles—albeit on a much larger scale and to a much greater degree—what the U.S. government is doing to Mexican and other Latin American immigrants and U.S. citizens. Given that Washington is willing to stomach genocide against the Palestinian people to further its interests in SWANA, there is little doubt that it will not balk at any suffering that attacks on Latin American states or people it deems as insufficiently subservient to its interests inflict on civilian populations. Also concerning is the manner in which the United States [threatened] (https://www.jornada.com.mx/noticia/2025 ... ion-al-bid) to withdraw funding for the Inter American Development Bank in retaliation for Colombia signing on to China’s Belt and Road initiative, as this indicates that Washington intends to turn Latin America into another battleground in its war with China.

Despite its historically close friendship with the United States, not even Mexico is entirely secure in this respect. In addition to threatening to inflict punishing tariffs on the country in order to coerce the Mexican state into both distancing itself from China and acting as an extension of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Trump has repeatedly suggested sending U.S. military forces into the country to combat the drug cartels, and even [pressured] (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/3 ... -to-mexico) president Claudia Sheinbaum to accept such “assistance.” While Sheinbaum has declared that Mexican sovereignty remains inviolable, in reality the Mexican state possesses few deterrents against unilateral U.S. military or clandestine intervention, should Washington decide to undertake it.

Abundant objective grounds, therefore, exist for international solidarity between the peoples of Latin America and SWANA in anti-colonial struggle, as well as ties with anti-imperial activists within the United States and other parts of the core. Inasmuch as it weakens U.S. hegemony and forces Washington to divert attention and resources away from Palestine, Iran, and the rest of SWANA, subversion of the U.S. influence in Latin America could bring some relief to the Palestinian people, while opening possibilities for the countries of both regions to delink from the worldwide system of capital accumulation and work towards more autonomous development. This is not to say that such efforts would be any easier or immune to violent reaction here than they are in SWANA or elsewhere. Again, the risks are grave, but those of inaction even graver. Ultimately, Washington views the people of SWANA and Latin America as entirely disposable, and will not hesitate to subject them to violence, misery, or death whenever and wherever U.S. interests—that is, the interests of U.S. elites—are at stake. Ultimately, perpetuation of the U.S. empire threatens all humanity with extermination. Resistance is an imperative of survival.

“La rebeldia es la vida: la sumisión es la muerte.”

(Rebellion is life: submission is death.)

—[Ricardo Flores Magón] (https://www.memoriapoliticademexico.org ... v-RFM.html)

https://mronline.org/2025/06/03/israel- ... perialism/

******

‘Not in our lifetime’: US rejects Palestinian statehood

US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said Arab states could ‘carve something out’ for a Palestinian state

News Desk

JUN 11, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Amir Cohen/Reuters)

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said on 10 June that Washington is not committed to a Palestinian state as a policy goal, calling on “Muslim-controlled countries” to “carve out” land for Palestinians.


“I don’t think so,” Huckabee told Bloomberg when asked if Palestinian statehood is still an eventual goal.

“Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there’s no room for it,” he said, adding that this would not happen “in our lifetime.”

“Where is it gonna be? Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?” he went on to say, using the biblical name for the occupied West Bank often used by Israel.

“Muslim controlled countries have 644 times the amount of land Israel does. When people say Israel needs to give up something you kind of scratch your head and say ‘let me see if I get this right …’ why should these people [Israelis] give way when these people [Muslim countries] have a lot of room that they could say ‘we’ll carve out something,’” Huckabee said during the interview.

Israel’s acceleration of illegal annexation plans and expansion of settlements in the occupied West Bank are designed to eliminate the possibility of any Palestinian state.

As mass displacement and land theft continue in the occupied West Bank, Israel is carrying out a new operation in the Gaza Strip aimed at displacing the entirety of the population and bringing the enclave under Israeli control.

Tel Aviv is pushing a US plan to expel Gaza’s population to other countries.

This month, France and Saudi Arabia will co-chair a UN conference aimed at resurrecting the idea of the two-state solution. Paris had reportedly been lobbying EU states to recognize Palestinian statehood at the upcoming conference – but has now backtracked, according to diplomats cited by The Guardian.

The conference will instead focus on outlining steps toward recognition, contingent on several measures, including a ceasefire in Gaza and reform of the Palestinian Authority (PA).

France has faced significant US pressure over the recognition plans, and Israel has vowed to escalate settlement expansion if such a decision is taken.

In July last year, Israel’s Knesset passed a vote overwhelmingly and categorically rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state. Several weeks before that, Spain, Ireland, and Norway announced their official recognition of Palestine as a state.

Washington had previously maintained that statehood for Palestine could only be achieved through direct agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, and that it would only support the idea as part of a negotiated settlement.

https://thecradle.co/articles/not-in-ou ... -statehood

May your lifetime be shorter than your boss's attention span, Mikey.

******

Image

Israel Cuts Gaza’s Internet Amid Soaring IDF Atrocities

It’s a nonstop war against visibility and truth, because Israel thrives on lies and darkness.

Caitlin Johnstone
June 12, 2025

The Palestinian Authority said on Thursday that internet and fixed-line services are down throughout the entire Gaza Strip following an Israeli attack on the last fiber-optic line in the enclave, AFP reports. Communications had already been cut off from northern Gaza the previous day.

“The southern and central Gaza Strip have now joined Gaza City and the northern part of the Strip in experiencing complete isolation for the second consecutive day,” the ministry said in a statement, adding that Israeli forces are preventing repair teams from reaching the site of the attack.

“Only people who have e-sims have access to the internet across Gaza,” Gaza journalist Hind Khoudary said on Twitter. “It takes you more than an hour to connect, and another hour to post. But why did Israel bomb the main internet fiber route? Why is Israel insisting on isolating Gaza from the world? So we are now deprived from food, water, electricity, and internet.”

Image

“Think of all the horrific images you’ve seen from Gaza. Now think of what worse carnage and murderous depravity Israel must be inflicting now to cut off the internet,” tweeted journalist Sam Husseini of the news.

Indeed, this latest move comes amid a particularly egregious spike in mass atrocities from the Zionist entity. Israeli forces just killed 120 people in a single 24-hour period and injured hundreds more, with scores massacred while seeking food from Israel’s notorious “death trap” aid distribution sites. Israel has been massacring starving civilians desperately seeking aid on a near-daily basis in Gaza over the past two weeks.

Israel is continually seeking out new ways to obstruct the world’s visibility into what’s happening with Gaza. That’s why they’ve been assassinating journalists who live in Gaza at a historically unprecedented rate while banning journalists outside Gaza from entering. It’s a nonstop war against visibility and truth, because Israel thrives on lies and darkness.

It has driven the Israelis mad that their global support is being eroded by Palestinians recording their own genocide and broadcasting the footage to the world. If they think they can get away with keeping Gaza in the dark they absolutely will do so, while continuing to seek out further ways to hide the truth from the world.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2025/06 ... trocities/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Jun 13, 2025 1:59 pm

Israel renews attacks as Iran appoints replacements for assassinated leaders

Iran has vowed a ‘bitter’ and ‘painful’ response to the Israeli campaign, which is expected to last up to several weeks

News Desk

JUN 13, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: AP)

New Israeli airstrikes hit the Iranian cities of Tabriz and Shiraz on the afternoon of 13 June, several hours after the start of Tel Aviv’s large-scale campaign against the country.


Circulating footage showed massive plumes of black smoke rising over the two cities. According to Iranian media reports, the new strikes on Tabriz targeted the city’s international airport.


Israel’s Channel 12 reported that warplanes bombed a missile production plant in Shiraz.


Earlier, Iran appointed replacements for the top military and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officials that were assassinated during the largescale Israeli bombing campaign against the country.

Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour has been made the new commander of the IRGC to replace Hossein Salami, while Abdolrahim Mousavi has been made chief of staff of the Iranian army, replacing Mohammad Bagheri.

Salami and Bagheri were assassinated along with several others, including the commander of the Khatim al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Gholam Ali Rashid, who has been replaced by Brigadier General Ali Shadmani. The replacements were issued in a decree from Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

At least six top nuclear scientists have also been assassinated.

Twelve Iranian provinces have come under Israeli attack since the early morning hours of Friday, according to Iran’s Red Crescent.

Widespread destruction, including in residential areas of Tehran and at key nuclear sites such as Natanz, has been reported. There are dozens of civilian casualties.

The Red Crescent said 95 people have been injured across the 12 provinces. Dozens of women and children are among the casualties, Iran’s IRNA outlet reported.

Hundreds of Iranian drones were launched toward Israel following the onset of the attacks, with most intercepted over Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Syria before reaching Israeli airspace.

Israel launched Operation “Lion’s Courage” early on 13 June.

Israeli officials cited by Axios claimed the operation was launched after eight months of planning – with a green light from Washington.

According to the Times of Israel, Mossad operatives built a covert drone launch base inside Iran as part of a years-long operation targeting the country’s nuclear and missile infrastructure. The operation involved smuggling weapons into Iran, disabling air defenses, and launching drone and missile strikes near Tehran.

Israeli forces reportedly carried out these missions undetected, claiming full aerial control over Iranian airspace.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the campaign against Iran will continue “as long as necessary.”

Israel’s Channel 14 said that the campaign against Iran will continue for weeks with varying degrees of intensity.

“With this crime, the Zionist regime has prepared for itself a bitter, painful fate, which it will definitely see,” Khamenei said on Friday morning.

“There remains no limit to the scope of Iran’s response to the Zionist regime, which has crossed all redlines by attacking the Islamic Republic,” the new chief of staff was quoted as saying.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israel-re ... ed-leaders

GHF contractor reveals 'horrific' details of US-Israeli 'aid traps'

At least 245 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces at GHF aid sites since the controversial plan was launched late last month

News Desk

JUN 12, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Reuters)

An anonymous US security contractor employed at one of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s (GHF) aid sites in the Gaza Strip has slammed the entire initiative as “pure chaos,” calling it “absolutely horrific” while accusing Israeli forces of continuously firing at unarmed Palestinians.

“I thought I was signing up for an aid mission. But what I've witnessed in Gaza is horrific,” the anonymous contractor wrote in a Zeteo article published on 12 June. “I am one of hundreds of security contractors who have been in Gaza to facilitate aid under the new US-backed GHF project. And it’s all bullshit,” the contractor added.

The contractor said his group of 300 people who were deployed to Gaza were provided with machine guns and pistols, and that while some of them had a military background, others did not – stressing “no one was tested to ensure they had proper training.”

“We were later issued less lethal options: pepper spray, flashbang grenades. You guessed it: no one was tested to see if they knew how to properly use them. How close to people can you throw a flashbang? If you're going to pepper-spray someone, where do you spray? For how long? Nobody knows because nobody told us. We're talking about people who don't have access to water, and we're ready to spray them in the face with pepper spray,” he said.

The contractor also stressed that no cultural awareness training was offered.

He confirmed that on the second day after the GHF was launched, the site he operated at was completely overrun by starving Palestinian civilians. “They were never aggressive towards us,” the contractor made sure to emphasize.

After falling back a second time, the contractor confirms that his group was ordered to expel all the aid seekers from the area, and that he witnessed other contractors firing live ammunition into the air.

One even pushed a Palestinian to the ground.

“We all got in a line and began pushing these people out. We’re telling crying women trying to pick up food for their families that they had to go. They were looking at this food on the ground that they desperately needed, and they couldn’t take it. It was absolutely horrific.”

“I was later told that the Israeli military needed to clear those people out because they were going to come through. They soon showed up with tanks, as some sort of security presence, but we had pushed people out by then,” he went on to say, adding that “This idea that the Israeli military isn't involved is bullshit.”

The contractor confirmed that the Israeli military has set up offices in the GHF compounds.

While they are not directly “on-site” during the aid operations, their tanks and sniper units are just hundreds of meters away, and “You can hear them shooting all day.”

The contractor notes one specific episode where hundreds of Palestinians approaching an aid site came under Israeli artillery fire.

“Tanks fire all day long near these aid sites. Snipers fire from what used to be a hospital. Bombs and bullets fly all day long in one direction – toward Palestinians … But never any fire from the opposite direction,” he added, calling the distribution sites “aid traps.”

“The west doesn’t really want to believe the Palestinian media,” the contractor also said.

Just two days ago, at least 36 aid seekers were killed and another 208 injured by Israeli attacks on GHF sites.

A video circulating online shows Israeli artillery shelling a group of civilians on the morning of 10 June as they attempted to reach the Netzarim Corridor aid site.


Since GHF was launched on 27 May, at least 240 Palestinians seeking aid have been killed and 2,152 injured by Israeli forces at aid sites.

The Gaza Government Media office has referred to the GHF sites as “death traps.”

GHF has been repeatedly condemned by the UN and other international humanitarian groups for being designed to reinforce further displacement of the Palestinian population in Gaza.

Most of the distribution centers are located in southern Gaza, with one in the center near the Netzarim Corridor. Palestinians are forced to travel long distances under bombardment and gunfire, before being crammed into extremely tight spaces and subjected to intensive restrictions.

Meanwhile, Israel’s recent ongoing operation – dubbed Gideon’s Chariots – continues to kill dozens and displace thousands across Gaza on a daily basis.

https://thecradle.co/articles/ghf-contr ... -aid-traps

*****

Gaza: The Sacrificial Ram on Capital’s New Altar
Posted on June 12, 2025 by Curro Jimenez

There’s a series called American Gods with a powerful concept: people’s beliefs and ideals are embodied as physical gods. As old beliefs fade from people’s minds, new ones take hold—giving rise to new gods. This sparks a war between the old gods, desperate to remain relevant, and the new ones, eager to dominate. The old gods, if forgotten, vanish into oblivion.

The tragedy unfolding in Gaza cannot be explained by rational arguments alone. It symbolizes the collapse of rationality as we once understood it. And yet, we might grasp its significance if we accept, as Matthew Arnold wrote, that we are “wandering between two worlds, one dead, the other powerless to be born.” Just like in American Gods, some belief systems are dying while others are still struggling to emerge.

The end of World War II consolidated a new nomos, in the sense used by German jurist Carl Schmitt. He defines nomos as “the immediate form in which the political and social order of a people becomes spatially visible.” This post-war nomos, based on a U.S.-led Western economic order, spread across the globe.

The United States was modeled, both symbolically and practically, after Rome. Rome claimed universality—what lay beyond its borders was chaos. But Rome’s universality was limited by the known world. The U.S., in contrast, claimed imperium over the entire planet.

Rome reached the peak of its universal claim under Emperor Augustus. Yet that peak, as historian Ronald Syme observed, also marked the beginning of its decline. Augustus’ seal was the Sphinx, a symbol rich in metaphor. Augustus was the guardian of Rome—but he was also the riddle. The enigma lay in the fact that, while the Republic’s formal structures (senators, consuls) remained intact, true power rested solely in his hands. If you couldn’t solve the riddle, you’d be devoured by the Sphinx.

The peak of visible U.S. power was, arguably, after the dissolution of the USSR. But if Augustus’ symbolic seal was the Sphinx, the U.S. symbol was the dollar—both devouring those unable to unravel the riddle.

Historian Edward Gibbon pointed to currency debasement—especially to fund foreign wars and state expenses—as one of the clearest signs of imperial decline. It’s debatable when exactly this began in the U.S., but there’s no doubt it is happening now. When an empire declines, its nomos begins to vanish.

But that nomos doesn’t disappear on its own—it is also forced by those competing to take its space. These challengers are both physical and ideological: they embody alternative visions of what society should be. Sometimes, the old order is pushed into the abyss, because that’s the only way a new one can rise.

Two major conflicts today have the potential to dismantle the U.S.-established postwar order: the war in Ukraine and the genocide in Gaza. What links them most visibly is the hand of the United States behind both. Though the conflicts appear different, each represents a different face of the same coin—a chipped one, at that.

Consider Ukraine. It’s hard to say whether the path to this war was plain stupidity, blind hubris, or a calculated strategy. The first two are intertwined, but I lean toward the second. Perhaps NATO expansionists believed Russia wouldn’t react. More likely, they believed Russia couldn’t react—as theorized by Brzezinski and his ilk.

The third possibility is even more provocative, though harder to prove: that NATO’s eastern expansion was a calculated move with two potential outcomes. Either Russia would acquiesce, becoming just another client state of the U.S.-led West. Or Russia would resist—and that resistance would mark the end of the West’s expansionary cycle, requiring its nomos to collapse so that capital could continue to grow elsewhere.

This last scenario may seem far-fetched, yet it is the one that’s materializing. The war in Ukraine cannot be resolved by reverting to the old status quo. The U.S. seems to understand that—but refuses to accept it. Europe, meanwhile, doesn’t seem to understand it—but has no choice but to accept it. And the main beneficiary of this new emerging scenario? Kapital—with Marx’s capital K.

The resolution of the Ukraine war will dismantle the previous geopolitical order. Borders will no longer be fixed. Spheres of influence will shift. Resources will grow more contested. Security agreements will have to be rewritten—and with them, new alliances will take form. Space—both geographical and political, a cornerstone of Schmitt’s nomos—will be reshaped. A new nomos is being born.

But nomos is not merely a spatial order. It is also symbolic. It demands new laws—and laws require new ideals. For the new gods to emerge, the old ones must die.

Gaza is where the old gods are dying. International law, the laws of war, humanitarian principles—they are being shattered with every hospital reduced to rubble, every school obliterated, every child killed by a drone or a sniper. More than that, the very foundation of liberal democratic legitimacy is being corroded by the complicity—and, often, the silence—of the U.S.-led West. After Gaza, the world we’ve known will have morphed into something else: the beginning of a new one.

We are witnessing it in real time. Europe is on a path to dismantle its social structures—the last remnants of working-class resistance against the encroaching force of capital. It is also unraveling the sovereignty of its nation-states, replacing them with a supranational governing entity. This process is not new, but it is being accelerated by the war in Ukraine. Re-arming Europe is not merely a military endeavor; it is an economic strategy designed to deliver the coup de grâce to national sovereignty.

The United States is already far ahead in this mutation. The White House even circulated a meme depicting Trump as a king. A joke, perhaps—but as if proving true Polybius’ cycle, it represents the next logical stage. New economic power, or, better, a rising oligarchy, needs to upend the previous order in order to establish its own. That is Ronald Syme’s thesis in his book The Roman Revolution.

This is evident in the rise of what economist Yanis Varoufakis calls technofeudalism—a system where tech-lords inch ever closer to the centers of global power. Despite his recent fall from grace, Elon Musk remains one of them. So do Sam Altman and Peter Thiel. And Palantir—Thiel’s fief—is, by its own admission, deeply involved in the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

Israel—modeled as the last Western-style colonial project—is now leading the West toward its own demise. Like the protagonist of a Greek tragedy, its defining trait—the claim to nationhood—is the very force that propels its downfall. And it is dragging the old gods with it into the grave.

If Ukraine is offering the geopolitical justification for a reordering of space, Gaza is providing the ideological justification for a transformation of spirit. Gone are the days when freedom of speech was even pretended to be an ideal, when human dignity was considered universal, or when equality before the law was a shared aspiration. Now, technology allows governments and corporations to efficiently censor thought and speech, accuse without real proof, and detain without due process.

Yet one force remains unchallenged: capital’s relentless drive to invent new ways of living. In its Freudian compulsion to replicate and expand, capital is reshaping not just markets, but space itself. It is forging a new nomos.

The question is not whether this is happening—I trust readers will agree that it is—but what form this new nomos will take. If we allow capital to dictate its terms, cloaked in the garments of new technologies, then we will all become—if we are not already—subservient to it.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/06 ... altar.html

******

"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:48 pm

Gaza Humanitarian Foundation: Direct Accomplice in Israel’s Killing and Starvation Machine, Must Be Held Accountable
Posted by Internationalist 360° on June 17, 2025
Euro-Med

Palestinians gather near an aid distribution center run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, 28 May 2025. © Reuters

Palestinian Territory – The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is directly responsible for the escalating Israeli crimes against starved Palestinian civilians near aid distribution points in central and southern Gaza.

The foundation’s operational model involves luring civilians to specific locations coordinated with the Israeli army, where they are subjected to killing, injury, and cruel and degrading treatment. These points have effectively become death traps used as tools in Israel’s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian population for over 20 months.

On Tuesday morning, at least 80 Palestinians were killed and 200 others injured by Israeli fire near a US-backed aid distribution point in eastern Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, as they approached the site to collect aid.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s operational model involves luring civilians to specific locations coordinated with the Israeli army, where they are subjected to killing, injury, and cruel and degrading treatment pic.twitter.com/xBaK4toPi5

— Euro-Med Monitor (@EuroMedHR) June 17, 2025


Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor calls for an independent international investigation into the foundation’s role and for its officials to be held criminally accountable for the crimes they facilitated—whether through planning, enabling, or remaining silent.

Euro-Med Monitor further urges donors to immediately halt all financial or logistical support to the foundation and to blacklist it among entities complicit in grave violations of international law.

The foundation’s continued operation of these sites—despite documentation of over 380 deaths in just three weeks—cannot be seen as incidental or isolated incidents. Rather, it constitutes direct involvement in the crime of starvation and the systematic targeting of civilians, a flagrant violation of humanitarian neutrality, and a clear contribution to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and complicity in genocide.

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said in a press statement that Israel has killed around 385 Palestinians and injured over 3,000 others since it imposed its aid distribution mechanism in the Gaza Strip on 27 May until 16 June. The Monitor explained that the mechanism relies on luring thousands of starving civilians each day to two main distribution centres—one near the “Netzarim corridor” in central Gaza and the other in Rafah, southern Gaza. Civilians are forced to walk long, exposed routes stretching for several kilometres, only to come under direct fire from military vehicles, drones, helicopters, and artillery shells. Large numbers are killed or wounded, while only the lucky few who survive the deadly journey reach the distribution points to receive a meagre amount of food that fails to meet even the minimum survival needs.

The Israeli army usually ignores the crimes it commits against starved civilians near aid distribution points. In the rare instances when it issues statements, it offers vague and generic narratives, often citing the presence of “suspects” near the forces—claims that are never substantiated with credible evidence. On the contrary, field data indicates that the victims are civilians, including women, children, and the elderly.

The investigations the Israeli army claims to open are even rarer than its public statements. These investigations are often superficial, left incomplete, their findings withheld, or they result in no real accountability. This reflects a systematic policy aimed at concealing evidence and ensuring impunity for perpetrators—a policy that spans decades of documented Israeli violations that have faced no serious accountability, including those committed as part of the ongoing crime of genocide in the Gaza Strip.

Euro-Med Monitor holds the international community responsible for allowing the continuation and escalation of systematic crimes committed by the Israeli occupation forces against starved civilians near the so-called aid distribution centres in central and southern Gaza. The failure of influential states to take deterrent measures—and their inability to exert any meaningful pressure to stop Israel’s crimes, including the continued operation of its inhumane aid distribution mechanism—has effectively provided political and practical cover for Israel to persist in using these centres as sites of mass killing and for carrying out practices that violate Palestinians’ most basic rights and demean their human dignity.

Israel, which is using starvation as a central tool in committing the crime of genocide, cannot under any circumstances be considered a legitimate party in any humanitarian operation
Relevant states and UN bodies have effectively abandoned their legal and moral obligations to protect civilians and prevent the worsening of the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. They have refrained from taking firm measures—not only to hold Israel accountable for killing starved civilians but even to protect the UN-led aid delivery mechanism, which Israel has deliberately undermined through siege and armed force, in blatant and dangerous defiance of the international system and the principles it was founded upon.

International reactions have often been limited to ineffective verbal condemnations, falling far short of any meaningful action. This has enabled Israel to continue committing its crimes without real cost, leaving civilians to face death—either from starvation or from gunfire—as they follow the same path drawn by the occupying power under the guise of “humanitarian aid.”

Continuing to allow Israel to carry out such serious crimes against Palestinians in Gaza—killing and injuring hundreds daily as they attempt to access limited food aid—entails international legal responsibility for states with the capacity to influence events, particularly those that continue to provide political or military support to Israel.

The failure to take effective measures—such as imposing sanctions or exerting genuine pressure to halt these crimes—constitutes, under international law, direct contribution to the crime or responsibility for failing to prevent it despite having the proven ability to do so. This establishes legal liability for those states as parties that have, through action or inaction, contributed to the continuation of the crime.

Since Israel imposed its own mechanism for the distribution of humanitarian aid, Euro-Med Monitor has documented the involvement of Israeli occupation forces—alongside local gangs operating in coordination with them and personnel from the American security company managing the distribution sites—in the killing of Palestinian civilians as they approached the centres, despite posing no real threat to Israeli forces or security personnel.

Even in cases where an alleged threat exists, international law does not justify the use of lethal force. Security forces are bound by international legal standards to adhere to the principle of proportionality and gradual escalation in the use of force, and are only permitted to resort to deadly force as a last resort—and only in situations where there is an imminent and real threat to life. Such conditions were absent in the documented cases, making these killings a grave and explicit violation of international law.

The deliberate targeting of Palestinian civilians—through killings and injuries as they attempt to access food—combined with the use of starvation as a weapon, constitutes a blatant violation of international humanitarian law and international criminal law. These are war crimes under the Rome Statute, including wilful killing, targeting civilians, and using starvation as a method of warfare—all of which are categorically prohibited during armed conflicts.

The pattern of these violations—characterised by their widespread and systematic nature against the civilian population—meets the legal threshold for crimes against humanity, particularly the crimes of murder, persecution, and inhumane acts causing severe suffering or serious injury to mental or physical health, when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population.

Placing these crimes within their broader context—including the systematic destruction of means of survival, obstruction of humanitarian aid, and the imposition of deadly living conditions on civilians, alongside public statements made by various Israeli political and military officials—reveals a clear and declared intent to destroy the Palestinian population in Gaza. This amounts, under Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, to the crime of genocide—specifically through the deliberate killing of members of the group and the imposition of living conditions intended to bring about its physical destruction, in whole or in part.

As the occupying power, Israel bears a legal obligation under international humanitarian law to ensure the entry of humanitarian aid and the fulfilment of the basic needs of the civilian population in the Gaza Strip. However, this duty in no way entitles Israel to manage or control the distribution of aid.

Aid distribution must remain exclusively in the hands of neutral and specialised humanitarian actors, and that any military or political interference by Israel in this domain constitutes a serious breach of international law and a deviation from the humanitarian purpose of relief work.

Israel, which is using starvation as a central tool in committing the crime of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza with the aim of destroying them as a national group, cannot under any circumstances be considered a legitimate party in any humanitarian operation. Involving Israel in organising or overseeing aid delivery only serves to turn the aid itself into a means of annihilating the population and imposing coercive options on survivors—paving the way for their forced displacement as part of a colonial project aimed at erasing their presence and forcibly annexing their land.

The refusal of UN agencies and independent humanitarian organisations to cooperate with the Israeli mechanism—due to its lack of even the most basic humanitarian standards—should serve as a clear warning and an urgent call for the international community, especially influential states, to intensify political and diplomatic pressure on Israel. This should guarantee the immediate and unconditional flow of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, end the use of any mechanisms employed as tools of genocide, and take swift action to end the ongoing crime against Gaza’s population since October 2023.

Euro-Med Monitor calls for comprehensive and independent international investigations into the role of the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in facilitating and executing serious crimes committed against Palestinian civilians. These investigations should address the individual responsibility of the organisation’s founders, directors, logistics coordinators, team leaders, and any other staff members—whether through planning, facilitating, directly contributing, or knowingly failing to prevent the commission of crimes.

We urge all states with territorial or universal jurisdiction to open immediate criminal investigations against all individuals affiliated with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and its contracted private security firms, in order to hold them accountable for their role in crimes committed against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, particularly including wilful killings, starvation, and cruel or degrading treatment.

We further call for the initiation of civil lawsuits before national courts to demand compensation from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and all implicated entities and individuals for the severe harm caused to victims and their families, including deaths, physical and psychological injuries, and the forced deprivation of the rights to life, food, and dignity. Both criminal and civil accountability is essential to ensuring justice for the victims, ending impunity, and preventing the recurrence of such crimes under the guise of humanitarian work.

States and relevant entities must exert all possible pressure on Israel to force it to cease killing starving civilians, immediately end the operation of its inhumane aid distribution mechanism, and push for the urgent restoration of humanitarian access and the lifting of Israel’s unlawful blockade on the Gaza Strip. This is the only viable path to halting the rapid humanitarian collapse and ensuring the unimpeded entry of aid and goods. Safe humanitarian corridors must be established under UN supervision to guarantee the delivery of food, medicine, and fuel to all areas of Gaza, alongside the deployment of independent international observers to monitor compliance.

Euro-Med Monitor also calls on all states, individually and collectively, to uphold their legal obligations and take urgent action to stop the ongoing genocide in Gaza in all its forms. It calls for all necessary measures to be taken to protect Palestinian civilians, ensure Israel’s compliance with international law and the rulings of the International Court of Justice, and guarantee accountability for crimes committed against Palestinians. It also urged the enforcement of arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court against Israel’s Prime Minister and former Defence Minister at the earliest opportunity, without prejudice to the principle that no immunity applies to international crimes.

Finally, Euro-Med Monitor urges the international community to impose economic, diplomatic, and military sanctions on Israel in response to its systematic and grave violations of international law. This includes a comprehensive ban on the export or import of weapons, spare parts, software, or dual-use items; the suspension of all political, financial, military, intelligence, and security cooperation with Israel; the freezing of assets belonging to political and military officials involved in crimes against Palestinians; travel bans against those officials; the suspension of Israeli military and security companies from international markets and the freezing of their assets in international banks; and the suspension of trade privileges, customs benefits, and bilateral agreements that grant Israel economic advantages enabling it to continue committing crimes against the Palestinian people.



https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/06/ ... countable/

******

'Our worst ally': Top Pentagon official sacked for criticizing US support to Israel

The military official said US support for Israel has only achieved 'the enmity of millions of people' and stressed Washington 'has not been an honest broker'

News Desk

JUN 18, 2025

Image
(Photo Credit: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

US Colonel Nathan McCormack, the head of the Levant and Egypt branch at the Joint Chiefs of Staff’s J5 planning directorate, was removed from his position this week after he criticized Washington's unwavering support for Israel on social media.

“Our worst ‘ally.’ We get literally nothing out of the ‘partnership’ other than the enmity of millions of people in the Middle East, Africa, and Asia," McCormack said in one of several posts discovered by the Jewish News Syndicate (JNS) on a semi-anonymous X account allegedly linked to him.

“The US has not been an honest broker. We have overwhelmingly enabled Israel’s bad behavior,” he adds.

In another post, the senior military official calls Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his coalition government “Judeo-supremacist cronies” who are "determined to prolong the conflict for their own goals: either to remain in power or to annex the land.”

“Israel’s actions over decades have prompted the accusations of ethnic cleansing and genocide,” another post reads.

He also charged western states of going “to great lengths to avoid criticism of Israel, much out of Holocaust guilt,” and, since June 2024, referred to Israel as a ”death cult.”

In response to the JNS report, an unnamed Pentagon official confirmed McCormack “will no longer be on the joint staff while the matter is being investigated,” adding that the Defense Department is assigning an investigating officer to examine the content and its implications.

“The individual is being returned to his service while the matter is being investigated,” the US official added.

The JNS revelations coincided with a new poll conducted by YouGov and The Economist, which shows that 60 percent of US adults oppose Washington's involvement in Israel's war against Iran.

Among those who voted for Trump in the 2024 election, 53 percent say the US should stay out of the war, 19 percent support involvement, and 28 percent remain unsure.

https://thecradle.co/articles/our-worst ... -to-israel

Just as well colonel, with morals like that you'd never get a star in this army.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Fri Jun 20, 2025 2:25 pm

The Slow Death of My Homeland: Watching Palestine Disappear One Settlement at a Time
Posted by Internationalist 360° on June 19, 2025
Ahmad Ibsais

Image
Me, in Palestine, looking over my city in 2022

50,000 New Housing Units, 943 Dead Palestinians, and the Administrative Annexation Hidden Behind Gaza’s Headlines


There is a particular kind of grief that comes with watching your homeland transform before your eyes, not through natural disaster or the passage of time, but through the deliberate architecture of erasure. Each time I return to what remains of Palestine, I find myself standing in places that have been carved up, renamed, and reimagined by those who would prefer we never existed at all. The hills where my grandmother once collected za’atar now sprout prefabricated homes and security towers, the olive groves that bore witness to centuries of Palestinian life replaced by suburban streets with Hebrew names that echo nothing of the history they have buried.

Image

This is not the clean, dramatic destruction that captures international headlines. This is something far more insidious and far more complete: the methodical transformation of a landscape and its people into something unrecognizable, a project so thorough and so patient that by the time the world notices, there is nothing left to save. While Gaza burns under the world’s gaze, the West Bank dies quietly in bureaucratic meetings and planning committees, its death certificate signed not by bombs but by zoning laws and municipal budgets administered by men like Bezalel Smotrich, who has turned ethnic cleansing into an administrative science.

The latest announcement of 22 new settlements represents more than just another land grab; it is the culmination of what Smotrich calls his “Decisive Plan,” a blueprint to annex the West Bank without triggering diplomatic blowback by making Jewish sovereignty an irreversible fact on the ground. These settlements are not random outposts scattered across stolen land but strategic nodes in a network designed to fragment Palestinian life so completely that the idea of a contiguous Palestinian state becomes not just impractical but literally unimaginable. When I see places like Homesh and Sa-Nur being resurrected from their 2005 evacuation, or new settlements like Mount Ebal rising near Nablus and Beit Horon North sprouting west of Ramallah, I understand that this is not about security or housing shortages but about the systematic erasure of Palestinian possibility.

Image

I think of the children I know who have never seen their homeland whole, who navigate their daily lives through a maze of checkpoints and bypass roads that multiply like a virus across their landscape. They grow up in a world where their villages are surrounded by settlements that spring up overnight like concrete mushrooms, where the land their families have farmed for generations is suddenly declared a nature preserve under military orders or transformed into an archaeological site requiring daily military raids to “protect Jewish heritage.” They watch Israeli children swim in pools built on land where their grandparents once grew olives, attend schools that their Palestinian neighbors cannot access, play on roads that Palestinian cars cannot use.

The bureaucrats who design this system understand something that too many observers miss: that occupation is not just about military control but about rewriting the very meaning of place through what Smotrich openly celebrates as changing “the system’s DNA.” When the Knesset advances bills to apply Israeli civil law to the West Bank, when they rename it officially as Judea and Samaria, when they initiate the first-ever land registration drive designed to reclassify any property without Israeli documentation as state land, they are not just stealing territory but stealing the possibility of Palestinian belonging. The new Settlement Administration that Smotrich created inside the Defense Ministry functions as a reverse coup, transferring control from military to civilian hands while maintaining the facade of occupation law, allowing ideologues to circumvent international legal constraints through bureaucratic sleight of hand.

The violence of this project reveals itself in numbers that accumulate like falling stones: over fifteen thousand new settlement housing units approved in just the first months of 2025, compared to less than ten thousand in all of 2024; another 1.9 billion dollars invested in West Bank roads despite settlers comprising only five percent of Israel’s population; 105 million dollars funneled to settlements for “security” purposes while 80 million in funding to Arab municipalities was frozen; over 943 Palestinians killed in the West Bank since October 7th, more than the total over the previous fifteen years combined. These figures represent not just policy decisions but the mathematical precision of ethnic cleansing, each budget line and housing approval another nail in the coffin of Palestinian futurity.

Image

The settlers who live in these colonies understand their role as foot soldiers in a project larger than themselves, which is why they build not just houses but entire universes designed to be separate from and superior to Palestinian life. They establish Regional Defense Battalions with army uniforms and M16s, using their new authority to raid Palestinian villages, destroy homes and infrastructure, uproot crops, and expel entire communities while the Israeli military stands down. They know that every outpost they establish beside a Palestinian village, every road they pave through Palestinian farmland, every swimming pool they fill in a landscape where Palestinian families ration water, is another step toward making Palestinian life impossible.

I watch Palestinian families adapt because they have no choice, finding new routes to work and school around the expanding geography of exclusion, learning to live with movement restrictions that cost Palestinian workers 373 million dollars in lost wages each month. They endure the daily reality of a system where settlers attack Palestinians an average of four times per day, where at least sixty communities have been expelled since October 7th, where children like the fourteen-year-old boy shot dead in Sebastia during a military operation to “protect Jewish heritage” pay with their lives for living on land that others have decided belongs elsewhere.

The international community speaks of two-state solutions and peace processes as if the ground beneath these concepts were not disappearing daily under the tracks of bulldozers and the signatures of planning committees. Diplomats draft statements about the illegality of settlements while those same settlements expand into cities with their own mayors and municipal services, while Israel moves toward approving fifty thousand new settlement housing units by the end of 2025, more than in the previous five years combined. French and Saudi officials plan conferences at the United Nations to revive momentum for Palestinian statehood while Smotrich openly declares 2025 “the year of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria” and works toward bringing an additional one million settlers into the West Bank.

What the architects of this project have perhaps not calculated is that Palestinian memory is not contained within the borders they draw or the registration systems they impose. The stones may be renamed and the maps redrawn, but the stories remain. The grandmother still teaches her grandchildren about the village that is now a settlement, the father still points to the hill where his father once grazed sheep, now crowned with an Israeli flag and surrounded by barbed wire. The landscape they are trying to erase is written not just in property deeds but in the bodies and memories of people who refuse to forget.

This is why each settlement is not just an act of theft but an act of defiance against the possibility that Palestinians might one day come home. But home is not just a place on a map; it is a relationship, a belonging, a way of being in the world that no amount of concrete and bureaucracy can fully destroy. Even as Smotrich builds his new legal departments staffed with lawyers tasked with managing settlement affairs, even as he creates bypass routes for funding illegal outposts without legal oversight, even as he transforms archaeological sites into biblical theme parks and sanctions cell phone carriers that fail to provide service across ninety-five percent of the West Bank, the homeland lives not just in the soil but in the stubborn persistence of those who refuse to be erased from it. And perhaps that is the one thing that all their planning and building and registering cannot account for: that a people’s connection to their land is not something that can be legislated away, that the homeland endures in the very refusal to accept that this systematic destruction represents anything other than a temporary interruption in a much longer story of belonging.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/06/ ... at-a-time/

How Iran’s Missiles Became Gaza’s Final Burial Shroud
Posted by Internationalist 360° on June 18, 2025
Ahmad Ibsais

Image
A family in Gaza, mourning another loss

How Netanyahu’s War on Iran Provides Cover for Gaza’s Final Solution.


The sirens wail across Haifa and Tel Aviv as Iranian missiles arc through the sky, and suddenly the world discovers its capacity for horror again, CNN anchors breathlessly counting each projectile while their cameras capture the dust clouds rising from Israeli cities. But three hundred miles south, in the killing fields that Gaza has become, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s soldiers methodically execute Palestinians who approached their food distribution sites this morning, adding three hundred fresh corpses to the mountain of bodies that now numbers not in the tens of thousands as official counts claim, but in the hundreds of thousands, entire bloodlines erased from existence while the world debates the trajectory of Iranian missiles.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s war cabinet orchestrated this escalation with Iran with the calculated precision of a magician’s misdirection, understanding that international attention operates like a searchlight, capable of illuminating only one crisis at a time. As Iranian projectiles streak across Israeli skies, the systematic extermination of Palestinians in Gaza fades from headlines with the convenience of a power outage, allowing the completion of a genocidal project that has been proceeding with industrial efficiency for twenty months. No war with Iran will erase Israel’s crimes in Gaza, but it will provide the perfect distraction while those crimes reach their final, irreversible conclusion.

This morning’s slaughter at the aid sites represents the apotheosis of a system designed not to feed the hungry but to eliminate them with maximum efficiency. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, that joint American-Israeli creation, has perfected the art of weaponized starvation, transforming the basic human need for sustenance into a death trap where approaching a bag of flour becomes an act of suicide. Three hundred Palestinians died today reaching for food, their bodies shredded by Israeli gunfire, their blood mixing with the flour they died trying to obtain. Tomorrow there will be three hundred more, and the day after that three hundred more, because this is no longer warfare but industrial extermination disguised as humanitarian assistance.

Netanyahu’s decision to attack Iran serves multiple strategic objectives that extend far beyond regional security calculations. With international pressure mounting over Gaza’s systematic starvation, with European allies beginning to impose sanctions on Israeli cabinet ministers, with the Franco-Saudi summit threatening to advance Palestinian statehood recognition, the Israeli prime minister needed a crisis that would reset the diplomatic clock and restore Israel’s position as victim rather than perpetrator. The Iran escalation accomplishes this transformation with surgical precision, converting Israel from a state committing genocide into a democracy under attack, deserving of unconditional support from its Western allies.

Image
Tehran, Iran

The mechanics of this genocide operate with bureaucratic precision that would make Eichmann weep with envy. Israeli forces position themselves around aid distribution points with the calculating efficiency of slaughterhouse workers, understanding that hunger will drive Palestinians into their crosshairs with the reliability of natural law. The foundation announces distributions through Facebook posts, the only communication channel left to a population deliberately severed from the world, herding desperate families toward predetermined killing zones where Israeli snipers wait with the patience of hunters during migration season.

Stories of Palestinians dying of starvation while queueing for food have vanished from international headlines, replaced by familiar narratives of Iranian aggression and Israeli victimhood that Western audiences find infinitely more digestible than the reality of children’s bodies torn apart by Israeli gunfire.

The relentless assault on the West Bank, the expansion of illegal settlements, the systematic destruction of Palestinian medical and educational infrastructure, all of these inconvenient truths recede from public consciousness as Iranian missiles provide the perfect justification for Israel’s regional rampage.

The communications blackout that Israel imposed on Gaza during the Iranian missile exchanges represents psychological warfare of extraordinary cruelty, ensuring that Palestinians remain trapped in informational darkness precisely when their need to communicate with the outside world becomes most desperate. Families cannot warn each other about which aid sites have become killing fields, cannot coordinate survival strategies, cannot even send final messages to relatives abroad. This engineered isolation transforms Gaza into a sensory deprivation chamber where the only sounds are Israeli gunfire and the screams of the dying.

The three hundred corpses produced by this morning’s aid site massacres join the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who have been systematically murdered since October 2023, their deaths carefully distributed across months and years to avoid the kind of concentrated attention that might prompt international intervention.

This is genocide as public policy, implemented with the methodical thoroughness of a government program, where each day’s killing quota is met with the efficiency of a postal service delivering death to predetermined addresses.

Israel’s attack on Iran represents what Nesrine Malik correctly identifies as a belated and dangerous attempt to restore the country’s shattered reputation after twenty months of documented atrocities in Gaza. The images of starving children, charred hospitals, and endless rows of body bags had begun to erode Israel’s carefully constructed narrative of moral superiority, threatening the unconditional Western support that enables its regional dominance. By opening a new front against Iran, Netanyahu provides his allies with the justification they desperately needed to continue their complicity in Palestinian destruction.

Image

The propaganda war runs parallel to the military campaign, both designed to reframe Israel as the defender rather than the aggressor, the victim rather than the perpetrator of regional violence. Western officials who had begun expressing discomfort with Gaza’s systematic starvation now find themselves issuing the same mealy-mouthed calls for restraint that characterized the early days of the Palestinian genocide, their moral qualms dissolved by the more familiar sight of Israeli cities under attack.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s operations reveal the sophisticated evolution of genocidal methodology, where the traditional tools of mass murder have been replaced by more refined instruments of elimination. Rather than gas chambers or mass graves, the Israeli military has created a system where basic survival needs become vectors for extermination, where seeking food guarantees death, where approaching medical care invites bombing, where attempting to flee ensures targeting. This represents genocide as social engineering, the systematic destruction of the conditions necessary for Palestinian life to continue.

The three hundred Palestinians murdered at aid sites this morning died not from military operations but from hunger, their desperation transformed into Israeli targeting data. These were not combatants or military targets but families who had been systematically starved for months, driven to risk death for the possibility of sustaining life for another day. Their children watched Israeli soldiers gun down their parents as they reached for bags of flour, trauma designed to ensure that those who survive carry the psychological scars necessary to complete the destruction of Palestinian society.

Emmanuel Macron’s postponement of the Franco-Saudi summit on Palestinian statehood demonstrates how Israel’s escalation with Iran serves multiple strategic objectives simultaneously. The growing international momentum toward recognizing Palestinian statehood, the increasing pressure from European allies, the mounting evidence of genocidal intent, all of these inconvenient realities dissolve in the smoke of Iranian missile strikes. Netanyahu’s gamble pays dividends measured in Palestinian corpses, each day of international distraction providing cover for another day of systematic elimination.

The clock has been reset, just as Israel’s strategists intended. The European Union’s human rights review of its trade agreements with Israel now disappears into bureaucratic limbo while EU officials focus on the Iran crisis. The sanctions imposed on Israeli cabinet ministers by the UK, Canada, France and Norway fade into diplomatic background noise, their symbolic power neutralized by the more immediate concerns of Iranian missile trajectories. This is strategic crisis management at its most cynical, where manufactured emergencies provide cover for ongoing atrocities.

The testimonies emerging from Gaza describe a reality that transcends conventional warfare and enters the realm of systematic liquidation. Survivors speak of Israeli forces continuing to fire on Palestinians as they fled the aid sites, pursuing the wounded and dying with the thoroughness of those whose mission extends beyond tactical victory to encompass total elimination. These are not the actions of soldiers engaged in military operations but of executioners implementing a carefully planned program of annihilation.

As Iranian missiles fall on Israeli cities and Western leaders rush to reaffirm their solidarity with the Jewish state, the real war continues in the shadows of manufactured distraction. The hundreds of thousands of Palestinians murdered since October 2023 represent not the collateral damage of warfare but the intended casualties of a campaign designed to make Palestinian existence impossible. Each murdered family represents not just current loss but the prevention of future generations, the careful pruning of a family tree until only stumps remain.

Image

No amount of Iranian missiles can wash the blood from Israeli hands, cannot erase the documented evidence of systematic starvation, cannot resurrect the children whose bodies have been torn apart by Israeli gunfire over twenty months of relentless killing. The war with Iran serves as a blood-soaked distraction from the central crime of our era, the deliberate elimination of Palestinian society while the world watches and counts missiles instead of corpses, measures property damage instead of human destruction, debates sovereignty instead of survival.

The arithmetic remains unchanged regardless of Iranian missile trajectories: hundreds of thousands of Palestinians dead, 2.3 million more trapped in conditions designed to ensure their gradual extinction, and an international community that has discovered its capacity for moral outrage only when Israeli cities come under attack. This is the true measure of our civilizational bankruptcy, where the systematic destruction of a people proceeds with bureaucratic efficiency while the world debates the finer points of proportional response and regional stability, where genocide becomes background noise to the more familiar symphony of state-versus-state violence that Western audiences find infinitely more comprehensible than the reality of Palestinian children starving to death in their mothers’ arms.

https://libya360.wordpress.com/2025/06/ ... al-shroud/

******

'Very bad decision': US envoy to Syria threatens Hezbollah against joining Iran–Israel war

Hezbollah denounced Israeli strikes on Iran and vowed “dire consequences” for threats to Iran’s supreme leader – but stopped short of declaring military intervention

News Desk

JUN 19, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir )

Thomas Barrack, the US special envoy to Syria, visited Beirut on 19 June and warned Hezbollah against getting involved in Israel's war on Iran, calling such a move a “very bad decision.”

Following his meeting with Lebanese parliament speaker Nabih Berri, a close ally of Hezbollah, Barrack was asked about the consequences of Hezbollah entering the war.

“I can say on behalf of [US] President [Donald] Trump, which he has been very clear in expressing as has Special Envoy [Steve] Witkoff: that would be a very, very, very bad decision,” Barrack told reporters.

He also met with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, where discussions included the issue of the state maintaining exclusive control over weapons.

Hezbollah has condemned Israeli strikes on Iran and expressed full solidarity with Tehran’s leadership. On the same day, the group warned that threats against Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei would have “dire consequences.”

However, Hezbollah has not made explicit threats to intervene. After Israeli strikes on Iran last week, a Hezbollah official told Reuters the group would not launch its own attack on Israel in response.

The group was left severely weakened by last year’s war with Israel, in which its leadership was gutted, thousands of fighters were killed, and strongholds in southern Lebanon and near Beirut were heavily damaged.

A US-brokered ceasefire that ended the war includes a stipulation that the Lebanese government must ensure there are no arms outside state control.

Barrack, a private equity executive and longtime Trump advisor who chaired his 2016 inaugural committee, also serves as US ambassador to Turkiye. He was appointed special envoy to Syria in late May.

US officials have escalated pressure on Lebanon with an ultimatum, urging the government to disarm Hezbollah or face possible military consequences.

Meanwhile, Israel continues to strike Hezbollah’s infrastructure in Lebanon, targeting operatives and military sites as part of a strategy aimed at weakening the group.

https://thecradle.co/articles/very-bad- ... israel-war
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Tue Jun 24, 2025 1:59 pm

The wall of silence on the Gaza genocide is finally starting to crack

Like thieves shunning the scene of their crime, media and politicians are suddenly scrambling to distance themselves from Israel.
Proletarian writers

Monday 23 June 2025

Image
With popular outrage continuing to grow, and the war to crush all middle-eastern resistance movements failing, the imperialists are desperately seeking a way out that might allow them to retain their regional domination – ideally by somehow keeping Israel itself alive.

Editors’ note: Since this article was written, the imperialists have launched a criminal, unprovoked, aggressive war against Iran. In this context, there has been a rush to whitewash Israeli crimes, to bury once again the truth about the Gaza genocide, and to present the zionist leaders as rational and principled actors. How long this narrative can be sustained in the face of reality remains to be seen.

*****

As this article was being written, 604 days had passed since Israel began its latest barbaric assault on Gaza, presented as a ‘response’ to the Palestinian resistance’s Al-Aqsa Flood operation on 7 October 2023. Every single one of those days has seen atrocities committed by the zionist regime – atrocities the imperialist media have either ignored, sanitised or justified.

From day one, the Israeli bombardment has been framed across the west as a ‘response to terrorism’, reducing a genocide to a supposed ‘act of self-defence’. Western media deliberately erase all context, presenting the conflict as something that begins and ends with ‘Hamas’.

‘Do you condemn Hamas?’
Rather than addressing the political, economic and historical root conditions of the conflict, media talking heads feign mock outrage and subject even slightly pro-Palestine interviewees to the now notorious loyalty test: “Do you condemn Hamas?”

No context is provided. No mention is made of over a century of colonial violence and subjugation. No mention of the repeated rounds of ethnic cleansing and illegal occupation. No mention either of any of the other strands of Palestinian resistance (whether communist, secular or islamic). As far as the imperialist narrative is concerned there is only one resistance organisation, ‘Hamas’, and only one way of describing its activities – ‘terrorist’.

This aggressive technique is used to deflect attention away from the crimes of Israel, which, if they are ever mentioned, are presented as either ‘unproven’ or a ‘painful but necessary response’. All focus is instead placed on the supposed crimes (mostly exposed as being fabricated but still endlessly repeated) of the resistance.

The question is particularly hard to answer clearly for those living in a country, like Britian, where Hamas itself is a proscribed organisation. Overt support for ‘Hamas’ can get you arrested, sacked and jailed, even though Hamas is the elected government of the Gaza strip, with many of its officials dealing in civilian administration far from the resistance activities of its armed wing. In fact, armed resistance to illegal occupation is a right enshrined in international law and repeatedly recognised in United Nations resolutions over the decades, and British law itself is in violation of this precept.

Not that you would know that from reading British media.

This trickery is one of the tools used to manufacture consent for imperialist-backed genocide – or at least to create confusion and apathy amongst the British population. If you say you do support Hamas, you can be arrested. If you say you don’t, you have immediately conceded that Israel has some basis for its genocidal actions.

Israel routinely and systematically targets hospitals, clinics, schools, universities, journalists, health workers, scientists, water plants, power stations and mosques. It blows up entire residential blocks and flattens neighbourhoods. All of which is presented by its spokespeople (who are then parroted in British media) under the blanket label of ‘striking Hamas targets’.

Of course, since ‘Hamas’ activities could be deemed to include everything involved in maintaining civil society in Gaza, according to the twisted logic of the zionists, that does indeed make teachers, journalists, street sweepers, irrigation workers and hospital staff (and all their friends and extended family members) ‘military targets’.

When Israel conducts its massacres, it claims it is killing terrorists – and the west nods along. Those who argue are immediately branded ‘supporters of terrorism’.

“Do you condemn Hamas?” has been a favourite weapon of media mouthpieces like Piers Morgan. While boasting that he is happy to “offer a platform” to pro-Palestine voices, Morgan has repeatedly browbeaten all such guests, putting them on the defensive from the off and making it very difficult for them to talk about the real facts of the matter.

One such guest, Dr Abdul Wahid, described the events of 7 October as “a very welcome punch on the nose” against the illegal occupation. Morgan immediately used this to launch a smear campaign that aimed to get Dr Wahid struck off the medical register.

Cracks in the narrative: the truth will out
Yet now even the mainstream imperialist media have begun to shift their tone – not because they suddenly gained a conscience after 20 months of endless slaughter, but out of necessity.

The imperialist bloc is not winning this war. Neither on the battlefield, nor in the court of global public opinion. The zionists were driven out of Lebanon, humiliated by Iran and Yemen, and have utterly failed to break the Palestinian resistance.

The genocidal destruction of Gaza has not secured Israeli supremacy – only guaranteed global disgust in perpetuity. The suppression of dissent across the west has not quelled mass support for Palestine – only granted hero status to those who continue to advocate for justice in the face of such repression. And the settler-colonial state itself is bankrupt and on the brink of social and economic meltdown.

With popular outrage continuing to grow, and the war to crush all middle-eastern resistance movements failing, the imperialists are desperately seeking a way out that might allow them to retain their regional domination – ideally by somehow keeping Israel itself alive. But if any such face-saving, colony-preserving deal is to be arrived at, there will need to be an accepted narrative regarding who is responsible for all the terrible crimes that have been perpetrated in the name of ‘stopping Hamas’.

Suddenly politicians and talking heads who yesterday were aggressively insisting on Israel’s ‘right to defend itself’ ‘by any means necessary’ are distancing themselves from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, from his closest and most rabidly genocidal cabinet colleagues, and from the most obviously egregious of Israel’s crimes.

Everyone now wants it to seem that they are personally opposed to the present starvation siege and continued massacre of innocents (even as the bombs continue to flow). Nobody wants it remembered that these crimes could not have been perpetrated without western bombs and planes, western military and intelligence cooperation, western manipulation of supposedly ‘international’ institutions (notably the International Court of Justice) and western media support.

Having done everything possible to facilitate the genocide in Gaza for a year and a half, no one wants to find themselves in the firing line if and when a peace process is instituted that has to at least appear to address the question of justice and accountability.

The shameless Piers Morgan is now among many who have started denouncing Israeli atrocities, particularly the killing of children, and who have begun to grill Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely in ways previously reserved for those trying to expose her country’s crimes.

Documentary filmmaker Louis Theroux has released a film called The Settlers. Though heavily sanitised, the programme does expose some of the realities of settler extremist violence and racism – and it has been aired by the notoriously pro-Israel BBC. A year ago, that would have been unthinkable.

Of course, what is missing when ‘right-wing lunatics’ are blamed for the crimes in Palestine (or, indeed, Ukraine) is the role of Anglo-American imperialism in creating these forces in the first place. Zionism is an ideology that was artificially created by British imperialism, which weaponised Judaism to serve its interests in the middle east. Not only was the ideology created in London, but the zionist movement has been funded and promoted by British and US finance capital for more than a century.

This is the true source of the apparently inexhaustible funding of the ‘Israel lobby’.

It was British imperialism that funded and backed the creation of the zionist settler-colony in Palestine, and US imperialism which took over the main role of keeping the colony armed and funded after the Suez crisis of 1956. Zionist supremacist fundamentalism may be the proximate cause of the troubles in Palestine and across the region, but Anglo-American imperialism is the ultimate cause – and the true culprit for every crime committed by its Israeli proxies.

This truth has been repeatedly recognised by leaders of middle-eastern resistance movements, from Iran to Lebanon, and from Palestine to Yemen.

The crisis of legitimacy
The shift we are now seeing in western media narratives is not indicative of a moral awakening. It is a tactical adjustment. The imperialists fear losing their grip, and the cracks in their narrative reveal the deeper rot in their system itself.

The wall of silence is cracking not because the system cares, but because it has realised it is losing. The resistance of the Palestinian people, not only in the last year and a half but across the last century, has brought us to a point where the brutality of imperialism is being fully exposed for the world to see. For once, a genocide is being documented in real time and followed by millions of people – as opposed to being gradually exposed decades later to the small numbers who are engaged enough to take an interest in such matters.

The media is scrambling not to save lives, but to save face. Meanwhile, our job is to help the working class recognise the umbilical cord that connects zionist atrocities with British imperialism; to popularise the understanding that if we want to rid the world of such abominations as we are seeing in Gaza today, we must oppose and destroy the imperialist system itself.

https://thecommunists.org/2025/06/23/ne ... -genocide/

******

Harvard study finds Israel ‘disappeared’ nearly 400,000 Palestinians in Gaza, half of them children: Report

The study uses data-driven analysis and spatial mapping to highlight a severe decline in Gaza’s population due to Israel’s indiscriminate attacks and siege

News Desk

JUN 24, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: AA)

A new report published by the Harvard database reveals that Israel has “disappeared” at least 377,000 Palestinians since the start of its genocidal campaign against the Gaza Strip in 2023.

Half of this number is believed to be Palestinian children.

The report was written by Israeli professor Yaakov Garb, who used data-driven analysis and spatial mapping to show how the Israeli army’s siege of Gaza and indiscriminate attacks on civilians in the enclave have led to a serious drop in its population.

The 377,000 Palestinians who are unaccounted for due to Israel’s genocide are approximately 17 percent of the Gaza Strip’s entire population, which now stands at about 1.85 million. Prior to the war in Gaza, the strip’s population was estimated at 2.227 million.

While some are displaced or missing, a significant number are believed to have been killed by Israeli forces, according to the report.

The professor notes that the official death toll of 61,000 is clearly an underestimate, as victims who remain trapped under rubble are not included.

Garb also condemned in the report the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – a controversial US-Israeli aid distribution mechanism launched last month.

“These aid compounds seem to reflect a logic of control, not assistance, and it would be a misnomer to call them 'humanitarian aid distribution hubs'. They do not adhere to humanitarian principles, and much of their design and operation is guided by other objectives, which undermine their declared purpose,” he said.

The UN has accused GHF of being designed to further the forced displacement. Since it began operations, GHF has led to the deaths of hundreds of Palestinian aid seekers by Israeli forces.

The Harvard report is not the first indication that the death toll in Gaza could, in fact, be significantly higher than reported.

The Lancet medical journal released a study in January this year revealing that the death toll from Israel’s genocide in Gaza was most likely undercounted by 41 percent in the first nine months of the war.

The January study highlighted that around 59.1 percent of those killed were women, children, and elderly.

The year before, in July 2024, The Lancet said Israel's assault on Gaza could lead to between 149,000 and 598,000.

https://thecradle.co/articles/harvard-s ... ren-report

Thousands flee Israel as western states scramble to extract citizens

Israel’s closed airspace and escalating missile strikes prompt evacuations by land, sea, and air as western states rush to remove their citizens

News Desk

JUN 23, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: EREZ UZIR/COURTESY OF BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL)

As of 23 June, more than 11,000 foreign nationals have been evacuated from Israel as its war on Iran enters its second week, prompting dozens of governments to launch emergency operations under closed airspace and intensifying missile fire.

Germany, the UK, Australia, France, the US, and several EU states have mobilized military aircraft, chartered civilian transport, and overland convoys to extract their citizens, many of whom were forced to cross into Jordan, Egypt, or Azerbaijan by bus or on foot before boarding outbound flights.

The UK Foreign Office has confirmed plans for a chartered flight out of Tel Aviv, while Germany has already flown out over 400 nationals. France, Italy, and others are coordinating similar extractions through neighboring countries as Israel's skies remain unsafe for civilian travel.

The US Embassy in Tel Aviv has organized six evacuation flights and cruise ship departures for more than 6,500 US citizens who registered to leave.

Australia has evacuated 1,200 citizens and deployed military personnel and aircraft under Operation Beech.

Irish Foreign Minister Simon Harris confirmed that 18 Irish citizens have been evacuated from Israel and Iran, expressing gratitude to EU partners for their assistance.

Romania has removed over 100 people, as Serbia evacuated 38 citizens and is preparing further extractions for more than 2,500 stranded nationals.

Portugal has taken out 69 individuals, Ukraine 176, and Japan 87, while Greece, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, South Korea, and Taiwan have also completed evacuations, with many involving foot crossings, bus convoys, and military transport under fire.

On 23 June, nearly 10 days after shutting its airspace following strikes on Iran, Israel reopened outbound flights from Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport, with departures capped at 50 passengers per plane, with priority given to medical, humanitarian, and national security cases.

All flights operate from Terminal 3 under strict regulations, as authorities warn the airport remains a potential target.

While El Al, Israir, and Arkia resumed limited inbound flights last week, foreign nationals had previously relied on overland or maritime exits through Egypt, Jordan, and Azerbaijan.

Though extractions from Iran are also underway, the bulk of international evacuation efforts remain focused on Israel, where the collapse of basic security assumptions has become increasingly difficult for its foreign allies to deny.

https://thecradle.co/articles/thousands ... t-citizens

******

Israel’s War Is Florida’s New Investment
June 21, 2025
By Katya Schwenk & Luke Goldstein, The Lever, 6/11/25

Florida is poised to eliminate long-standing guardrails limiting local investment in increasingly risky Israel bonds that help finance the country’s war efforts.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) is set to quietly ban any financial-risk standards when local governments use public money to invest in bonds funding Israel’s government – just months after a major credit rating agency warned the bonds were at risk of default and a potential “junk” rating.

By creating the special carveout and allowing unrestricted investments into a foreign country on the brink of regional war, Florida politicians now threaten to funnel an even greater share of local governments’ savings to the Netanyahu regime’s war efforts.

The legislation also introduces a new financial model enabling local governments around the country to invest virtually limitless sums in the Israeli war effort, despite the mounting financial risk of doing so.

The Florida bill was brought to the legislature by one of the state’s wealthiest counties and home base of President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort: Palm Beach, which is facing a lawsuit from its own residents for sinking 15 percent of its savings portfolio in debt-issued Israeli bonds, making the county the world’s largest investor in Israel bonds. The only foreign bonds that localities in Florida can invest in by law are from Israel.

Outside of direct military assistance to Israel from the federal government, bond purchases have become a key node for U.S. states and localities to provide billions of taxpayer dollars to Israel, particularly during the Israel-Hamas war following the Oct. 7 attacks.

The main broker for Israel bonds, which operates on behalf of the Israeli government, lobbied for the first-of-its-kind legislation, according to records reviewed by The Lever.

The introduction of the bill came just months after the preeminent Wall Street credit rating agency Moody’s downgraded Israel’s bonds from an “A” to a “Baa” rating amid its mounting geopolitical turmoil, indicating a significantly higher risk that Israel fails to pay back its investors.

The assessment also noted that the impact of the war on the country’s long-term financial prospects created “much higher [risk] than is typical” even at the lower investment rating. That means another potential downgrade could be on the horizon, which would put the country’s debt security into the lower “junk” bond tier, making it an even riskier asset to hold.

Two other major U.S. credit rating agencies slightly downgraded Israel last year.

Because of the downgrades, Palm Beach and other counties invested in Israel, including Miami-Dade, would be in violation of their local investment policies for any future Israel bond purchases, which mandate an “A” rating for Israel bond purchases. Those restrictions would be wiped away by the new bill, which passed unanimously through the Florida legislature in April and now awaits signing by DeSantis before the end of the legislative session this month.

“The bill is specifically designed to create an exemption [for Israel] just like the U.S. government has in lots of other areas where Israel would otherwise run afoul of U.S. law,” said Michael Omer-Man, the director of research at Democracy For The Arab World, an advocacy group that’s tracked the activity of Israel bonds.

Another example Omer-Man cited is a federal law that prohibits U.S. aid to security forces committing human rights abuses, which human rights organizations have documented at the hands of the Israeli military.

The Florida legislation could also have widespread financial implications, according to municipal finance experts.

“This is definitely a first,” said University of Chicago professor Justin Marlowe, who runs the school’s Center for Municipal Finance. “I’ve not seen any attempt to do some sort of a legislative carveout of the sort that we’re talking about here.”

He said the policy is “paving the way for a big shift in behavior on the part of states and localities.”

Palm Beach County did not reply to The Lever’s request for comment on the bill.

A Possible “Foreign Agent”
Since the start of the Israel-Hamas war, Israel has received a record-setting influx of $5 billion in financing from public and private U.S. investors to help address its mounting piles of debt. State and local governments make up $1.7 billion of that overall investment.

Bonds are fixed-income securities bought by investors to loan the government money and are paid back over a long period of time, anywhere from two to 15 years, at a set interest rate.

Proceeds from these bonds return to Israel as a surplus budgetary fund for government projects, including to offset the costs of its military campaigns.

Some 90 states and localities already had millions of dollars of investments in Israel bonds on the books well before the Israel-Hamas war, but such efforts increased dramatically in the past year and a half.

All of this U.S. investment is facilitated by the main underwriter and promoter of these government-backed instruments: the Development Corporation for Israel, also known as Israel Bonds. The operation has sales offices across the country, offering bonds to retail investors as well as public pensions, treasury funds, and institutional investors on Wall Street.

“Oct. 7 changed everything,” said Dani Naveh, the current president of the Development Corporation for Israel and former member of both the Israeli Knesset and a cabinet minister, earlier this month, announcing record U.S. sales of Israeli debt. “What followed has been nothing short of extraordinary. This $5 billion isn’t just capital, it is a global vote of confidence in the Israeli economy.”

Israel Bonds, whose head is selected by Israel’s finance minister, dates back to the early years of the country and played a crucial role in corralling U.S. financing for the Six-Day War in 1967 and later the Yom Kippur War in 1973.

The broker doesn’t just facilitate bond sales. Israel Bonds has transformed into an all-encompassing financial and political operation that lobbies for legislation to boost bond sales and hosts lavish private junkets to wine and dine politicians, according to an investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists last year.

These influence-peddling activities have raised legal questions about whether or not Israel Bonds is operating in the U.S. as an unregistered foreign agent. According to a letter sent to the Justice Department last year from Democracy for the Arab World Now calling for an investigation, Israel Bonds acts “at the direction and control of the Israeli government, acts as a publicity agent for Israel; promotes the public and political interests of Israel.”

Israel Bonds did not return a request for comment from The Lever.

Israel Bonds has successfully convinced numerous state governments, including Louisiana, Indiana, New Jersey, and New Mexico, to undo long-standing rules banning them from purchasing foreign government bonds. Israel Bonds has also gotten county governments to ease remaining local investment restrictions on foreign-issued debt.

It’s not just Florida that’s poured out its coffers to show support for the U.S. ally. Under Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Arkansas’ public pension plan authorized a $50 million investment in Israel bonds this spring. Ohio, meanwhile, has invested more than $50 million since October 2023, bringing the state treasury’s holdings up to $260 million. New York State has committed a total $267 million from its state employees’ pension fund into Israel bonds.

Yet these investments pale in comparison to those of Palm Beach County, which under its Democratic local comptroller Joseph Abruzzo has become the world’s largest investor in Israel bonds. When Abruzzo took office in 2021, Israel bonds were capped at 5 percent of the county’s portfolio. In his first year, Abruzzo doubled the cap to 10 percent. Last year, the county voted again to raise the cap to 15 percent.

Abruzzo has since increased the county’s Israel bonds holdings to $700 million, up from just $40 million in 2022. According to county finance documents, Israel bonds now make up 16 percent of Palm Beach’s holdings.

Like other public investors in Israel bonds, Abruzzo has explicitly described his investment calculus as politically motivated, in direct support of Israel’s military operations.

“There could be no greater advocacy that we could do in our office right now than support the state of Israel,” Abruzzo, a former reality TV star with a net worth of $16 million, said in the days after Oct. 7, announcing an initial $25 million round of bond purchases. More recently, he has denied that the motivations are anything other than strictly financial. Florida state law bars any investments of public savings for ideological reasons.

In turn, as state and local treasuries ramp up their investments in Israel bonds, they have faced mounting public opposition. Protesters across the country have demanded public divestment from Israel bonds, citing their role in funding the carnage in Gaza.

Last May, several anonymous residents of Palm Beach County brought a lawsuit against Abruzzo over the mammoth investment in Israel bonds, arguing that the county’s $700 million purchase was “unprecedented,” “a great concentration of risk,” and violated its fiduciary duty to taxpayers, given the clear signs the bonds would be downgraded as Israel’s economy struggled. Florida statute, the plaintiffs noted, directs that local governments cannot invest to benefit “any social, political, or ideological interests.”

The plaintiffs in the case are Palestinian Americans, all of whom have lost friends and family members in Gaza, where tens of thousands of civilians have been killed since Oct. 7.

“I feel such horror at my local taxes being used to fund such violence and destruction towards Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza,” one plaintiff said in a declaration last year.

The suit highlighted Palm Beach County’s ongoing financial troubles, including a $730 million funding gap for capital projects — all worsened by security costs for Mar-a-Lago, which the county must foot. “If the State of Israel were to default on these bonds, then Palm Beach County would have to find a way to pay its bills without money that it had counted on being available,” one expert is quoted as saying in the lawsuit.

In a November 2024 legal filing, attorneys for Palm Beach called the lawsuit against the county “entirely devoid of legal support.”

The lawsuit was voluntarily dropped in January due to a procedural issue, but a lawyer working on the case, Lydia Ghuman, confirmed to The Lever that the team intends to refile the suit in the fall.

In the meantime, the ongoing legal battle — alongside national attention to Palm Beach County’s investments — may be an impetus behind the county’s efforts to get a carve-out for Israel bonds passed at the state level.

Ghuman emphasized, though, that the legislation wouldn’t put an end to her team’s case. “It doesn’t change the fact that… we have a bunch of other statutes regulating investments that we’re suing [Abruzzo] under,” she said. “If anything, it shows how he is not listening to the voice of his constituents and is manipulating different processes to allow him to make unchecked investments.”

A “Striking” Shift
After Moody’s downgraded Israel bonds, Palm Beach County faced a conundrum: Palm Beach’s local investment policy, like those in other counties, prohibits investment in bonds rated lower than an A credit rating. Not only did the policy threaten future county investments in Israel, it also exposed county officials to legal scrutiny over their current investment portfolio.

In February, Florida lawmakers unveiled a bill that aimed to solve Palm Beach County’s problems. The legislation would amend state law to bar any local government from setting a minimum credit rating exclusively for Israel bonds. The legislature’s own bill analysis specifically cites the Moody’s downgrade and Palm Beach County’s investment policy as part of the rationale for why the legislation is necessary.

Abruzzo, the Palm Beach County treasurer, brought the bill to the legislature, and he testified in support of the legislation at a March public hearing.

“I cannot thank the committee enough for taking up this bill to ensure we keep supporting what I consider our greatest ally Israel and investing in Israel bonds,” he told lawmakers.

Behind the scenes, the Development Corporation for Israel used its lobbying muscle to push for the bill’s passage. The group hired the well-connected Florida lobbying shop Capital City Consulting, which includes numerous former DeSantis aides and staffers.

Meanwhile, Palm Beach County advocated for the legislation through the lobbying titan Ballard Partners, whose Florida alumni include Trump’s chief of staff Susie Wiles and Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Donate To The Lever

Both chambers of the Florida legislature subsequently passed the bill unanimously. A DeSantis spokesperson confirmed to The Lever that the bill “has not reached his desk.” There are a number of bills still awaiting a signature from the governor in the remaining weeks of the Florida legislative session.

Should DeSantis sign the bill, it could set a precedent for other states and localities to take on more financial risk to finance Israel’s war effort. Abruzzo, Ghuman noted, holds a position with an Israel Bonds’ leadership group, composed of treasurers across the country. “He’s already in a position of power where he can spread his ideas to other states,” she said.

Daniel Garrett, a professor of finance at the University of Pennsylvania, told The Lever that while he didn’t think that the guidance would have much impact on local investment decisions, he wasn’t aware of any comparable legislation.

“I can’t think of any other kind of encouragement to invest in risky securities,” he said, although he added that most states set various “restrictions on how investment policies can be written.”

Marlowe at the University of Chicago emphasized that the bill was part of a “striking” government investment shift allowing a “serious concentration of risk in these portfolios in a way that we had never seen before.”

He added, “It’s one thing for a county to buy up these bonds in the first place, it’s another to explicitly de-diversify the portfolio, which flies in the face of the philosophy of how to invest public money.”

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2025/06/isr ... nvestment/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14804
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Palestine

Post by blindpig » Thu Jun 26, 2025 2:36 pm

Israel's national airline offers 'deep discounts' to lure back settlers who fled in droves

Egypt and Cyprus remain overwhelmed by fleeing Israelis, as regional officials warn of surveillance threats and activists condemn selective border treatment

News Desk

JUN 25, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Moshe Shai/ Flash90/ File)

El Al, Israel's national airliner, has introduced heavily subsidized return flights on 25 June aimed at repatriating Israelis who fled during the recent war against Iran.

The state-backed offer includes capped fares through the end of June – $99 from European cities and $649–699 from the US – roughly half the standard price. Once repatriation flights are full, remaining seats will become available to the general public.

In Cyprus, where thousands of Israelis remain, emergency repatriation efforts continue. Cruise ships and diverted flights have brought back many in recent days, but Jewish community leaders warn that shelters and resources are overstretched as people await flights home.

This campaign was triggered by the closure of Israeli airspace on 13 June, after Iranian missile strikes damaged key infrastructure following Israeli attacks on top Iranian figures.

Since the ceasefire went into effect on 24 June, Israeli airports such as Ben Gurion and Haifa have fully reopened, and wartime travel restrictions – including the exit ban – have been lifted.

While inbound flights have resumed, a cabinet resolution had required Israelis to obtain approval from an “exceptions committee” before travelling abroad – but this is no longer necessary following the ceasefire.

Foreign nationals have been permitted to leave via land or sea since the air ban, but Israeli citizens were previously barred from purchasing outbound flights. As a result, hundreds fled by yacht from Herzliya, Haifa, and Ashkelon, sailing to Cyprus before onward travel to Europe.

Egypt emerged as another escape route. Sinai authorities raised the alert level due to an influx of Israelis via the Taba crossing. Security officials cautioned that the arrival wave could be used by Mossad operatives posing as tourists, presenting surveillance and destabilization risks.

This movement sparked criticism from Egyptian activists, particularly given Cairo’s crackdown on Gaza-bound aid convoys. “It is outrageous that Israelis can walk into Sinai, but activists … are turned away,” one organizer told Middle East Eye (MEE).

Many of those who fled hold dual citizenship – either immigrants who retained their original passports or Israeli-born citizens who later acquired second nationalities. Common destination countries include the US, EU states, Russia, and Ukraine.

The repatriation campaign highlights growing contradictions. While Israel actively encourages returnees with subsidized flights, its wartime policies briefly trapped its own citizens abroad or forced them into risky sea evacuations.

https://thecradle.co/articles/israels-n ... -in-droves

‘No survivors’: Israeli media reveals details on latest Hamas ambush in Gaza

A resistance fighter approached an army vehicle carrying seven soldiers and placed an explosive device on it

News Desk

JUN 25, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Qassam Brigades Military Media)

Hebrew media has released new details on the resistance ambush against Israeli forces in south Gaza’s Khan Yunis, in which seven soldiers were burned alive in their troop carrier following an explosive attack claimed by Hamas’s armed wing.

“At exactly 5:30 pm yesterday, the first report came in about a fire breaking out in an armored personnel carrier (APC) of the POM type, belonging to the engineering forces. Initial investigations suggest that a militant approached the APC and attached an explosive device to it. The device detonated, causing the entire vehicle to catch fire,” Israeli journalist and army radio correspondent Doron Kadosh reported on 25 June.

“Military firefighting teams rushed to the scene to extinguish the fire in the APC. A D-9 bulldozer was brought in and dumped sand onto the vehicle in an attempt to smother the flames, but all firefighting efforts failed,” Kadosh added.

After failing to extinguish the flames, rescue forces towed the military vehicle to Israeli territory as it was still on fire with the soldiers inside.

“The fire was only extinguished once the vehicle had reached Israeli territory. Rescue teams and helicopters were dispatched to the scene, but none of the fighters survived. No one remained to be rescued from the wreckage. All seven soldiers were killed.”

Kadosh went on to say that it took several hours to identify the bodies of the seven Israeli soldiers.

In a statement on its media channel released on 25 June, Hamas’s military wing, the Qassam Brigades, announced the operation, which was carried out with an explosive device placed on the vehicle by a resistance fighter.

“During a complex ambush, Qassam fighters managed to destroy a Zionist personnel carrier yesterday afternoon, Tuesday, with a Shuath explosive device that was placed inside the [vehicle] and led to the complete burning of the vehicle and its crew,” the Qassam Brigades said in a statement on Wednesday afternoon.

“After that, our fighters targeted another Zionist personnel carrier with a ‘guerilla action’ explosive device near the Ali bin Abi Talib Mosque in the Ma’an area, south of Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip. Our fighters monitored the landing of the helicopter for the evacuation, which continued for several hours,” the Qassam Brigades added.

On Wednesday morning, the Israeli army released the names of the seven soldiers killed in the attack on the troop carrier.

“I send my deepest condolences to the families who lost their dearest loved ones, and I share with them in their unbearable grief at this difficult time,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement.

Nearly two years into the genocidal war on the Gaza Strip, the Palestinian resistance continues to ambush soldiers and inflict losses on the Israeli army.

Israel has failed to achieve the stated goal it set for itself at the start of the war in October 2023 – the complete eradication of Hamas.

In recent years, the resistance group has recruited thousands of new fighters.

Israeli intelligence estimates say that around 20,000 of the Palestinian resistance movement's military operatives remain alive, including several commanders, some of whom are senior officers.

Several other resistance groups, including the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) movement’s Quds Brigades, remain active across the strip.

https://thecradle.co/articles/no-surviv ... sh-in-gaza

Washington green-lights $30m for Gaza aid scheme tied to mass killings of Palestinians

Over 500 Palestinians have been killed at GHF aid sites that are now set to receive US funding, on top of tens of billions in military support sent to Israel

News Desk

JUN 25, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: AP photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

The US government approved a $30 million grant to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) on 20 June under a “priority directive” from the White House and the State Department.

According to a document reviewed by Reuters, an initial $7 million had already been disbursed at the time. This is the first publicly known financial contribution by Washington to the GHF, which until now had received only diplomatic backing.

Two officials cited in the report said the US may approve additional continuous monthly grants of $30 million to the group.

GHF, launched in late May, is a joint US–Israeli initiative that relies on private US military and logistics contractors to deliver and distribute aid across Gaza. Its activities have been closely linked to the killing of hundreds of Palestinians attempting to reach food and water.

According to the Gaza Health Ministry, at least 516 people have been killed near GHF aid points in the past month, with footage from the sites showing crowds being dispersed under live fire.

Medical teams have treated dozens of gunshot wounds to the head and upper body. The UN has warned that the “weaponization of food” at these sites may constitute a war crime.

One GHF contractor, writing anonymously in Zeteo, described the operation as “pure chaos,” confirming the presence of Israeli tanks and sniper units near the aid compounds.

He said unarmed aid-seekers were fired upon, pushed, or expelled from the sites, and described the distribution model as an “aid trap.”

Most GHF distribution centers are located in southern Gaza or along Israeli-controlled corridors. According to Gaza’s Government Media Office, this forces displaced Palestinians to move under fire toward tightly controlled zones where they risk being killed while waiting for food.

On 11 June, Israeli artillery shelled aid-seekers near the Netzarim Corridor, killing 25 people. In similar incidents documented by +972 Magazine, survivors recalled being shot at or crushed in stampedes while trying to reach flour or canned goods.

Despite repeated calls for an independent investigation, US officials have blocked all related resolutions at the UN Security Council (UNSC).

By June 2025, Washington’s total US aid to Israel’s war effort is estimated to exceed $35 billion, which includes over $22 billion in direct military funding, alongside arms deals and regional deployments approved since October 2023.

https://thecradle.co/articles/washingto ... lestinians

‘No breakthrough’ in Gaza truce efforts: Report

Hamas sources told Arab media that the resistance movement is ready for ‘flexibility’ but will not compromise on its terms for a full ceasefire and withdrawal of Israeli forces

News Desk

JUN 26, 2025

Image
(Photo credit: Fadel Senna/AFP/Getty Images)

Hamas sources cited in Arab media on 25 June said efforts to resume negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza are progressing “more effectively” than during the 12-day Israel–Iran war.

However, the sources, who spoke with Asharq al-Awsat, said “there is no real breakthrough to speak of at the present time,” while stressing that Hamas continues to insist on a full withdrawal and permanent ceasefire, as well as reject disarmament.

The sources also said Hamas is willing to show “flexibility.”

"A new round of indirect negotiations will be held within a few days, either in Cairo or Doha,” the sources went on to say. They added that mediators have resumed efforts to kickstart talks and that “some parties communicating with the US have also contacted the Hamas leadership again to make mutually agreed-upon arrangements.”

The ceasefire talks stalled in May after US President Donald Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff said Hamas’s request for amendments to a US proposal was “unacceptable.” The proposal calls for a 60-day cessation of hostilities and the release of half the living Israeli captives still held in Gaza.

Hamas demanded guarantees for a permanent end to the war and withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza.

According to the sources who spoke with Asharq al-Awsat, Hamas is willing to relinquish control of Gaza as part of a deal including a full ceasefire and withdrawal. “The matter will be in Israel's hands, not ours, and the movement's leadership is prepared to offer the greatest possible flexibility in order to reach a real agreement that will end the suffering of the people of the Gaza Strip and halt this bloody war.”

The sources stress that there are two main obstacles, which are the demand for “disarmament of Hamas and the Palestinian factions, as well as the removal of the movement's leaders and factions from the Gaza Strip.”

“Hamas is under significant pressure from some parties to make greater concessions, particularly regarding disarmament or the departure of the movement's leaders, but this matter is not up for discussion,” they said, adding that Israel continues to “reject a complete withdrawal from the strip.”

Israel continues to relentlessly bombard Gaza, killing dozens on a daily basis. The flow of humanitarian aid remains significantly restricted, and the new US-Israeli Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid distribution mechanism has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians since last month.

Ground troops are continuing mass displacement in the strip, solidifying control over Gaza as part of Operation Gideon’s Chariots.

Meanwhile, settler violence against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank has surged.

On 25 June, three Palestinians were killed and seven others injured by Israeli troops in the town of Kafr Malik east of Ramallah – coinciding with a violent settler attack on the area.

The Israeli forces secured protection for the settlers and fired live bullets at Palestinians, while preventing ambulances from reaching and transporting the injured, WAFA news agency reported.

“This crime must not pass without consequence. Our rebellious people must respond with full force to the occupation and its settler militias, especially at flashpoints throughout the occupied West Bank,” Hamas said in a statement.

https://thecradle.co/articles/no-breakt ... rts-report
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply