Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Fri Jan 05, 2024 1:19 pm

Political wills
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/05/2024

Image

All together and following a line clearly marked by the needs on the front, the different Ukrainian authorities continue to demonstrate to reaffirm the military route as the only possible solution to the current conflict. Just a few hours after Zelensky spoke in the same terms, Dmitro Kuleba has been even clearer. “We do not have a plan B,” the leader of Ukrainian diplomacy stated in his most recent appearance in the media, adding “we trust in plan A”, that is, in continuing the war until the final defeat of Russia. Clinging to that idea that in the last twelve months has proven to be beyond Ukraine's reach, it is necessary to look for the appropriate arguments to create the conditions that make it possible to continue rejecting plan B, diplomacy, at all costs. In a defensive phase and after a failed offensive on the front -although not so much in the attempt to do damage in the rear-, Ukraine bases its speech on the unacceptable nature of negotiating with Russia, the risk of defeat and, above all, the benefit that supplier countries can obtain proxy war.

“As the Secretary General correctly said, what is given to Ukraine is not charity. It is an investment to protect NATO and protect the prosperity of the American people,” said Kuleba, addressing directly those who must approve new funds in the country that is the main military donor. Yesterday, John Kirby again reminded that the United States has already exhausted all funds available to Ukraine, so there will be no new military assistance until Congress approves a new item. In high places he is especially concerned about the provision of missiles for Ukrainian defenses. With US funds still frozen, the Russian bet is to try to destroy Ukraine's military industrial potential to the maximum.

Although it was evident with the objectives attacked in the last days of 2023, on Wednesday, the daily report of British intelligence was forced to admit it. Russia is not focusing on critical civilian infrastructure like a year ago, but on military production. And she does so now that she is aware that Ukraine's defense capacity is undermined by uncertainty about when the flow of financing will restart. And despite continuing to describe missile attacks as acts whose sole objective is to “kill the maximum possible number of civilians,” even the belligerent Mijailo Podolyak has admitted that the main difficulty for industrial production in the country is the certainty that it would be destroyed by Russian missiles. The objectives are clear, they are military and they occur at what is perhaps the moment of greatest vulnerability for Ukraine. Without being able to turn to Washington for help, other supplier countries have wanted to increase their participation in the common effort to acquire ammunition for Ukrainian defenses.

Yesterday, the same day that Kiev claimed to have surface-to-air missiles for just a few more Russian attacks, NATO's Procurement and Supply Agency said that Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and Romania had signed an agreement to acquire a thousand missiles for the American Patriots that Ukraine has. The apparent race is repeated again to see which arsenal runs out first, Russian missiles or Ukrainian anti-aircraft missiles. The Russian ability to continue producing, especially in a context of lack of financing for Ukraine, shows that it is Moscow that has the advantage in this winter duel. In this context, the ammunition acquired by these four NATO members represents a contribution that is unlikely to change the course of the battle for the skies over Ukraine.

With war as the only option and the benefit of NATO countries as the main argument, many think-tank analysts linked to the field of security and military industry seek to amplify the need, not only to continue with the supply that occurred in 2023, but to increase it. Ukraine's enormous needs for weapons and ammunition mean that these individual contributions from a number of countries are nothing more than a drop in what those who defend this option understand must be an ocean of financing and resources.

Although the mainstream media periodically broadcast analyzes on the importance of continuing to maintain the State and Armed Forces of Ukraine, the article published this week by Foreign Affairs , an influential magazine in the US foreign policy establishment , is especially detailed on the causes of failure. of the Ukrainian offensive, the reasons for continuing to insist on preparing new attack actions and Ukraine's needs to achieve it.

To begin with, Jack Watling, with a long history within the apparatus of organizations linked to the security and military sector, makes it clear that Ukraine needs time. One of the reasons for the failure of the Zaporozhie operation is, in his opinion, the poor training that the units have received in the hasty courses carried out in NATO countries. Hence, it only focuses on local offensives to maintain tension and prevent deep Russian advances - the equivalent of the "active defense" that Russia has carried out during the months in which it has prepared for the Ukrainian Zaporozhie operation - in looking for time to prepare next big actions. This future does not only involve giving Western countries time to train the Ukrainian brigades, but above all to produce and gather the massive quantities of weapons that the war foresees will require. The case of artillery is the clearest, with estimates according to which Ukraine would require 2.4 million rounds of ammunition per year, Watling openly admits that the American and European industry would be able to provide only half that amount this year. .

But the problems are not limited to artillery production. “To regenerate its offensive capabilities and defend itself against Russian attacks, Ukraine will need approximately 1,800 barrels of spare artillery per year. The handful of existing howitzers in Europe cannot meet this demand. The numerous fleets of vehicles gifted to kyiv over the past two years also require a continuous supply of spare parts. Air defense interceptors will also be a persistent need: Russia currently produces more than 100 ballistic and cruise missiles and 300 attack drones a month. To contain the damage from these weapons, Ukraine will need replenishments of Western air defense systems,” insists the article, which gives only a few glimpses of the enormous quantities of weapons that kyiv would need each year to continue the war.

The logical conclusion, taking into account Ukraine's inability to produce its own material and the industrial deficiencies of Western powers to maintain a high-intensity war, is that "if Western countries do not increase their production capacity for these systems, Russia will win." departure". The need for increased military spending and investment in industry is the new Western mantra, which sees assistance to Ukraine not as “simply giving money to Kiev,” but as “an investment by its partners in their own manufacturing.” defending". With this argument, which is based on the fact that the war will continue for at least two more years, without the destruction, the suffering of the population and the impoverishment of the country being a factor to be taken into account, Watling states that “The main barriers to ensuring that Ukraine does not lose the war are political.”

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/05/voluntades-politicas/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for January 3-4
January 5, 2024
Rybar

Image

Ukrainian formations launched a series of attacks on the Crimean Peninsula , including the use of Storm Shadow cruise missiles. Thanks to the professional work of Russian anti-aircraft gunners, significant damage was avoided.

In the Liman direction , the Russian Armed Forces were able to advance, occupying several strongholds in the landings towards Terny and Yampolovka . There are about three kilometers of fields left to populated areas.

Some successes were recorded in the Rabotino area in the Zaporozhye direction , as well as in the northern reaches of the Avdeevsky fortified area near Donetsk .

On the rest of the front line, predominantly positional battles continue. The Russian Armed Forces are using various means to process the enemy’s front line and rear targets, and also operate in small assault groups.

Missile strikes by the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the Crimean Peninsula

Image
On the night of January 2-3, loud pops of air defense operations were heard throughout Sevastopol . Exactly after a massive strike by the Russian Armed Forces, Ukrainian forces tried to strike back at the peninsula. Two S-200 anti-aircraft missiles were fired from the vicinity of the Alibey test site in the Odessa region . One of them was shot down on approach to Sevastopol, and the second fell in the area of ​​Mount Kara-Koba without causing any damage.

Apparently, the Ukrainian Armed Forces again tried to attack the warehouses and infrastructure of the Black Sea Fleet on the northern side of Sevastopol and in the vicinity of Inkerman . At the same time, units of the 31st Air Force and Air Defense Divisions marked up to six air targets. Presumably, two more S-200s fell into the water west of Cape Fiolent , before reaching Crimea.

And two more missiles (based on the speed and flight path we can conclude that these were anti-ship Neptunes) flew past Sevastopol and their signal was lost in the direction of Novorossiysk . Apparently, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were aiming at some other objects, but the missiles, either due to a failure in the system or due to the active operation of electronic warfare, strayed from the trajectory and subsequently fell into the water.

As a result, the enemy attack failed. And, looking at the nature of its conduct, it seems that the Ukrainians were in a hurry, trying to interrupt the information feed, but to no avail. However, repeated attempts are possible in the coming days, including with the use of cruise missiles.

Image
However, a day later, Ukrainian formations again tried to strike Crimea . This time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces approached the attack more prepared: in anticipation of the raid, the aviation moved to several bases to divert attention. At around 16.20, five Su-24M bombers and two MiG-29 fighters took off from the airbases of Starokonstantinov , Mirgorod and Kanatovo , which launched Storm Shadow cruise missiles and several ADM-160 MALD decoys in the direction of the peninsula.

The first missile was shot down over Uyutny near Yevpatoria . Storm Shadow debris caused minor damage to infrastructure, but no casualties were recorded. Two more "Storms", rounding Cape Fiolent , attempted to attack air defense units in Sevastopol . It was not possible to shoot down the missiles, but they did not reach their target - the military personnel of the 31st division continue to work. Several more air targets (the attacks were a combination of cruise missiles and decoys) were destroyed by the crew of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system over Pesochnaya Bay near Tauride Chersonese . And a couple of “Storms” were shot down in the vicinity of the Fedyukhin Heights and at the Balaklava Thermal Power Plant . Judging by the flight path, the target could be an important energy facility.

In total, Russian military personnel shot down ten missiles, most of which were Storm Shadow. The essence of this raid indicates the enemy’s tactics in attacks on Crimea. At the initial stage, the Ukrainian Armed Forces actively hit ships and objects of the Black Sea Fleet , forcing them to stay close to their own bases. Now the enemy is trying to destroy the air defense on the peninsula. And the next stage, judging by the trends, should be attacks on the Crimean Bridge. It doesn't matter that it won't provide any tactical advantage. The main thing is the PR effect, as well as reputational losses for the Russian leadership. At the same time, fighters of the 31st Air Force and Air Defense Division are now repelling a drone attack, after which a missile attack is possible.

Prisoner exchange

On the afternoon of January 3, the long-awaited exchange of prisoners of war took place between the Russian and Ukrainian sides. This event was preceded by a long negotiation process , sabotaged by the Ukrainian side.

In total, the Russian side was able to return 248 military personnel to their homeland , 75 of whom were rescued from Ukrainian captivity in exchange for five Azov commanders who were taken from Turkey.

In turn, the enemy announces the return of 230 military personnel of Ukrainian formations, including: 130 representatives of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (TRO - 14 , Navy - 14 ), the National Guard - 55 , the State Border Service - 38 , the National Police - one , and six other citizens. .n. Ukraine.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

In the Slobozhansky direction, the Russian Armed Forces are carrying out preventive work to destroy concentrations of enemy personnel and equipment in border settlements. Warehouses and deployment points of Ukrainian formations are covered with artillery fire, including the use of precision-guided ammunition.

In the Liman direction, the Russian Armed Forces continue to push through enemy defenses east of Makeevka , as well as in the Serebryansky forestry area . In addition, the footage posted by the enemy records the advance of the Russian Armed Forces in the direction of Tern and Yampolovka . There are still about three kilometers to go to the outskirts of neighboring settlements with several forest stands.


In the Soledar direction, positional battles are taking place in the area of ​​Bogdanovka , Kleshcheevka and Kurdyumovka . The Russian Armed Forces are making attempts to advance on the approaches to Chasov Yar along the highway from Khromovo . In addition, several strong points were taken in plantings near the highway southeast of Bogdanovka .


The main events in the Donetsk direction are developing in the vicinity of the Avdeevsky fortified area . The Russian Armed Forces are advancing locally in the Krasnogorovka area and are shelling Pervomayskoye with artillery in anticipation of a possible operation to liberate the settlement.


In the South Donetsk direction, the line of combat contact has not undergone significant changes. At the same time, the Russian Armed Forces are systematically hitting various targets in Novomikhailovka and the surrounding area, using both airstrikes and mine-laden armored vehicles under remote control.


In the Zaporozhye direction, positional clashes continue in the area of ​​Verbovoy and Rabotino . Small assault groups of the Russian Armed Forces are attempting to advance under the cover of air strikes in order to regain control over positions previously lost during the enemy’s summer offensive.


In the Kherson direction the situation has not undergone significant changes. The Russian Armed Forces are conducting a counter-battery fight, destroying identified enemy artillery and other equipment. Some time ago, two launchers from the IRIS-T air defense system were damaged or destroyed by strikes from the Lancet UAV. Ukrainian formations continue to try to transfer fresh forces to the bridgehead in Krynki on the left bank of the Dnieper, losing boats and personnel, including from kamikaze UAV strikes.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

Image
In the Bryansk region, the activation of air defense systems in the Pogarsky district was recorded . There is no information about the nature of the target, as well as the consequences on the ground.

Image
Armed formations so-called. Ukraine on January 3 damaged a substation in the Zheleznogorsk district of the Kursk region . Power outages were recorded in several settlements, and in Zheleznogorsk itself , 17 houses were left without heating as a result of a heating main break. On the afternoon of January 4, the border village of Guevo was also shelled .

Image
For several days in a row, the Russian Armed Forces have been repelling Ukrainian attacks on populated areas in the Belgorod region . According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, on the night of January 2-3, air defense crews on duty intercepted two Tochka-U missiles and seven Vilkha MLRS missiles. Already in the morning, the department reported on repelling another attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces: six Tochka-U missiles and six more Vilkha MLRS missiles were shot down.

At the same time, shelling of border settlements continues. Thus, in the Valuysky GO the village of Soloti came under attack . Currently, it is known that several residential buildings were damaged and a 14-year-old girl was injured. In addition, Ukrainian formations shelled Glotovo , Zamosc and Nowa Tavolzanka with artillery. In Murom , Shebekinsky District, the enemy damaged a private house with a drop from a UAV. In Demidovka, an excavator hit a mine, a worker received shrapnel wounds and concussion.

The head of the region described the current situation as “tense.” They were also told that a meeting of the operational headquarters would be held on January 8, at which it was planned to consider the possibility of extending the winter holidays for a number of educational institutions in the Belgorod region.

Image
Shelling of populated areas in the Donetsk People's Republic also continues . Ukrainian formations are firing at the western regions of Donetsk and Gorlovka with cannon and rocket artillery, including NATO calibers. Private and multi-apartment residential buildings were damaged, and power supply was disrupted in Gorlovka . In the Kirovsky district of Donetsk, two men and a woman were injured as a result of a drone drop. In the Kuibyshev region, a woman was killed and a man was wounded by fire from Ukrainian forces. Another woman died in the Yasinovatsky district .

Image
In the Zaporozhye region, Ukrainian formations attacked at least four settlements on January 3-4. In Kamenka-Dneprovskaya, private houses were damaged during several shellings, one civilian was killed and another civilian was injured. In addition, Tokmak and Stulnevo were under enemy fire , as well as Vasilyevka , where the power plant was damaged.

Image
In the Kherson region, artillery strikes continue on various settlements on the left bank of the Dnieper . During January 3-4, at least eleven settlements were hit, and in Zburyevka , Peschanivka and Novaya Kakhovka , several UAVs were shot down by air defense forces on duty.

Political events
About the supply of equipment and other assistance so-called. Ukraine

The Czech Republic supplied 26 Dana-M2 modifications for the needs of Ukrainian troops along with several thousand DN1CZ shells with a firing range of up to 25.5 km. Germany has not yet decided on the supply of Taurus missiles; government spokesman Steffen Hebestreit said that the position of the state authorities has not changed. However, despite this, rumors are circulating on the Internet about the supply of these missiles to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

There are also problems with other types of German-made weapons. In particular, according to media reports, Germany has to transport most of the Leopard tanks, damaged but surviving, across the border of Ukraine, since the tanks were transferred without spare parts. However, the German authorities announced a new package of arms supplies for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Enemy formations will receive the SKYNEX air defense system with ammunition, two TRML-4D radar stations, 10 Marder infantry fighting vehicles, ammunition for Leopard 2A6 tanks, missiles for the IRIS-T SLM air defense system, ammunition for the Patriot air defense system, as well as various types of 155-mm ammunition.

At the same time, US administration spokesman John Kirby said at a briefing that the White House will not be able to find funds from alternative sources if Congress does not agree on a request for new assistance to Kiev, and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba noted that Kiev does not have a Plan B ” in case Western aid is cut, as they are confident in supplies.

On the obvious problems of mobilization

Citizens of the so-called Ukrainian males who are unable to flee the country are faced with more and more new problems. Capture continues on the streets of various cities, and drones are being used to search for fugitives at the border.

At the same time, the authorities are discussing various options for a new mobilization, including openly mocking ones. Thus, the ex-Minister of Economy of Ukraine Milovanov proposed mobilization through a lottery or drawing of lots.

About problems on the Polish-Ukrainian border


Polish farmers resumed pickets and blocking of the Medika-Shegini checkpoint on the Polish-Ukrainian border. Protesters inspect trucks and allow only humanitarian aid and perishable food for the so-called Ukraine.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

*******

Ukraine SitRep: Zelenski's Propaganda Outlet Is Leading His Decline

In early 2022, at the start of the war in Ukraine, the government of President Zelenski monopolized all television news:

Since the early days of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, the people of Ukraine have had access to a single source of television news — an all-day broadcast packed with footage of Ukrainian tanks blasting Russian positions, medics operating near the frontline and political leaders rallying support abroad.
The show, Telemarathon United News, has been a major tool of Ukraine’s information war, praised by the government officials who regularly appear on it for its role in countering Russian disinformation and maintaining morale.

“It’s a weapon,” President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said last January of the program, which is jointly produced and broadcast 24/7 by the country’s biggest television channels.


The Telethon, as it is known in Ukraine, became the sole source of news on Ukrainian airwaves. It was partially financed by the Ukrainian regime. It soon developed into the main outlet for the Ukrainian government to spread its propaganda. It continuously presented alleged Ukrainian successes and derided Russia's capabilities.

It had deluded many Ukrainians into believing that their country can win the war.

But since the much propagandized 2023 'counteroffensive' has failed people have turned away from it.

A few still hang on. In a recent debate with military officers in Ukraine one pimpled youngster, drunk on Telethon disinformation, asked one of the Ukrainian officers about the 'bad quality of Russian weapons'.

He received an unexpected response. (I have seen the video of the exchange on Twitter but fail to re-find it.)

Strana, the Ukrainian news service prohibited in Ukraine and Russia, reported the exchange (machine translation):

Meanwhile, the Ukrainian military is discussing that at the end of the second year of the war, the Russian army is better armed and equipped than the Ukrainian one. This was stated by the battalion commander of the third assault brigade (one of the main strike forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine) Rollo.
This is how he answered the question of what the average Russian military equipment is and "how much worse it is than ours."

"The Russian army is no worse than the Ukrainian one, even better. Technologically better equipped, more equipment, better weapons, better equipment than the Ukrainian one. What makes you think they're worse? This is even some kind of humiliation that turns out to be ours. Like, "f**k you're fighting the law and there's nothing you can do?". But because they are stronger - this is objective, " Rollo said.

According to him, the Russians not only have better equipment, but also state programs for equipping and providing the army.

"Don't underestimate the opponent, this is a very serious opponent. More serious than most armies in the world. Treating them like dol***bam and lo*am, that's what we do, dol***oby and lo*i, if we do that," Rollo added.

Other commanders advised turning off the telethon at home, which promotes the idea that the Russian army is weak.


(I do not know what "dol***bam" and "lo*am" stand for but they don't seem to be nice words.)

The third assault brigade is part of AZOV, the fascist organization that has grown exponentially under the Zelenski regime.

If even its ideological deluded officers freely admit that Russian forces are superior to them, imagine how the average Ukrainian soldier on the ground feels about his country's chances to win the war.

In early March 2022 I had warned that Lies Do Not Win Wars. Ukrainian propaganda, with support from western media, the neoconservative ISW and the disinformation branch of Britain's Ministry of Defense, has been full of lies and exaggerations. But the real war is lost on the ground and, over time, its reality seeps in.

The Telethon has lost its usefulness due to the constant disinformation it has spread. Its viewership is down to 10% as the Ukrainian people now get their news from Telegram and tune their TVs to reality shows and other diversions on different channels.

That the New York Times has finally picked up on this can be interpreted as a U.S. government attempt to further distance itself from the Zelenski regime in Ukraine:

Another concern is that Telemarathon has transformed into a public relations operation for Mr. Zelensky, who remains Ukraine’s most trusted political figure but has seen his approval ratings decrease in recent months.
Figures compiled by Mr. Kulias show that members of Servant of the People, Mr. Zelensky’s party, accounted for more than 68 percent of the program’s political guests in 2023, with this proportion rising steadily throughout the year. Servant of the People controls half of the seats in Parliament.

“It’s like a unanimous point of view,” Andrii Khantil, a 41-year-old lawyer, said of Telemarathon on a recent evening near the Golden Gate, a reconstructed gateway that marked the entrance to Kyiv in medieval times. “It’s not really what we need. It’s not helpful."


This attack on Zelenski's propaganda outlet comes while there is a new spat between the president and the commander of the Ukrainian force over the additional mobilization of 500,000 men. Zelenski had said that this would fulfill a requirement that the military had made.

General Zaluzny publicly rejected that claim:

In response to recent statements suggesting a potential mobilization of up to half a million people in Ukraine, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Valery Zaluzhny, said that the military command has not formally requested the mobilization.
“The military command has not made a single request [to the authorities] for any figures. The military command continues to perform the function of protecting the state and, accordingly, forms its requests for ammunition, weapons and human resources,” Zaluzhny stated during a national telethon.

“This is done on an ongoing basis, but we do not carry out [such requests] in some separate format by submitting it to the government or the Verkhovna Rada,” he added.


Zelenski's attempt to pass the mobilization buck to Zaluzny has failed. As the reality of a lost war bubbles to the surface his public ratings will sink to new lows.

Gordon Hahn describes the atmosphere in Ukraine as pre-revolutionary:

Kiev is now gripped by crisis politics. With the Ukraine’s defense lines and army in slow-motion collapse and extreme discontent among top military commanders and across the political elite, Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelenskiy is fighting for his political and personal survival. More importantly, the stakes could not be higher for the Maidan regime’s coalition of nationalists, neofascist, corruptionaires, new oligarchs, and the occasional republican. Meanwhile, the young Ukrainian state, based on still poorly consolidated quasi-republican institutions and a nationalist ideology, is at risk of disintegration, dissolution, and even disappearance. It surrounded by growing threats: the Russian army, angry Ukrainian soldiers and commanders, Kiev’s financial and economic insolvency and dissipation, popular desperation, and the risk of palace or military coups, even a new ‘Galician’ civil war.

Soon something will break.

The telethon that had helped Zelenski to gain the peoples' attention and admiration is now leading the path to his decline.

I doubt that he, at the end of this years, will still be the president of Ukraine.

Posted by b on January 4, 2024 at 10:21 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/01/u ... .html#more

******

Citizenship for foreign volunteers
January 4, 12:55

Image

Foreigners who enlist in the RF Armed Forces can count on receiving Russian citizenship. Everything is logical here. If you fight for Russia, you have the right to be a citizen of Russia.

Family members of a volunteer can also count on a Russian passport.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8872667.html

Citizens of Ukraine who lived in Sevastopol before March 18, 2014 can obtain a Russian passport
January 4, 16:30

Image

Today is truly a day of interesting documents.

Citizens of Ukraine who were born and permanently resided in Crimea or Sevastopol before March 18, 2014 will be able to apply for Russian citizenship.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8873129.html

Greetings from Kim Jong-un
January 4, 23:20

Image

The United States has officially stated that the Russian Armed Forces have already used at least two North Korean ballistic missiles with a range of 900 kilometers in Ukraine and intend to launch them in the future. According to Kirby's statement, the launches took place on December 30 and January 2. The United States does not provide any material evidence (for example, missile debris with North Korean markings).



Of course, there is nothing wrong with the very fact of using North Korean missiles. We get additional means of fire destruction, the Koreans get money for missiles and experience in using their missiles in combat conditions in case they have to work on Seoul.

The United States claims that a North Korean KN-23 ballistic missile (an illegitimate relative of the Iskander) was launched into Ukraine. This OTRK has several modifications with different ranges, different warheads and different accuracy.



https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8873979.html

40% of Kyivstar infrastructure destroyed
January 5, 10:13

Image

40% of Kyivstar infrastructure destroyed

Russian hackers have had access to the internal systems of the largest Ukrainian mobile operator Kyivstar since at least May 2023. Ilya Vityuk, head of the SBU cybersecurity department, told Reuters about this. He said the Dec. 12 attack caused “catastrophic” destruction and should serve as a big warning to the West: “no one is untouchable.”
Catastrophic destruction: Russian hackers deal devastating blow to Ukraine's largest operator AP
Russian hackers have been on the system of Ukraine's largest operator Kyivstar since at least May last year in a cyberattack that should serve as a "big warning" to the West. The head of the SBU cybersecurity department, Ilya Vityuk, spoke about this in an exclusive interview with Reuters.

In the interview, Vityuk revealed details of the December 12 hack, which he said resulted in “catastrophic” destruction and was aimed at inflicting a psychological blow and gathering intelligence information. The attack destroyed “virtually everything,” including thousands of virtual servers and computers, Vitiuk said, calling it the first example of a destructive cyberattack that “completely destroyed the core of a telecom operator.”

On December 12, a hack disabled Kyivstar services for approximately 24 million users for several days, Reuters recalls. “This attack is a big signal, a big warning not only for Ukraine, but also for the entire Western world, so that they understand that no one is untouchable,” Vityuk said.


https://russian.rt.com/inotv/2024-01-04 ... ri-nanesli - zinc

Russian hackers from the Solntsepek group took responsibility for the destruction of the network infrastructure of the largest telecom provider in Ukraine.

Team of Russian hackers penetrated the network of the Ukrainian operator and firmly established itself there. During the attack, the internal network infrastructure of the organization, which provides communications not only to millions of subscribers, but also to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, was destroyed. But that's not all. Our hackers got hold of the personal data of the company’s clients: full names, passport details and addresses. We are talking about millions of records.

In addition, backups were also destroyed - as proof of this, the hackers provided screenshots of the backup server they took control of. Kyivstar “possibly” still has some offline backups on tapes, but it is too early to talk about the timing and possibility of a complete restoration of the entire infrastructure - the scale of destruction is too great, and the relevance of backup copies is a big question. Moreover, Russian hackers left many surprises for their opponents.

As our colleagues said ( https://t.me/readovkaru/5225 ) earlier, the attack could not have been so effective without help from within. Team "Solntsepek" ( https://t.me/solntsepekZ) has already expressed gratitude to the caring employees of Kyivstar.

https://t.me/readovkanews/70728 - zinc

Great job. Glory to Russian hackers.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8874285.html

Google Translator

*******

Did Armenia Re-Export Indian Shells To Poland To Pass Along To Ukraine At The US’ Behest?

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 5, 2024

The US orchestrated this scandal not only to help complete Armenia’s pro-Western pivot and stir trouble in Indo-Russo ties, but also provoke India’s denial, which could then be spun to fuel the false narrative that it pivoted away from the West towards Russia. The resultant optics could manipulate Westerners into supporting more muscular moves against India in the future, perhaps even as far as sanctions, which could further worsen bilateral relations across the coming year.

The “Ukrainian Front” account tweeted footage on 30 December of what some experts have claimed are Indian 155-mm artillery shells being loaded into a Polish-made Krab self-propelled howitzer, which prompted several days later Delhi to deny that it exported any such ammo to that country. The timing of this scandal coincided with the end of External Affairs Minister (EAM) Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar’s impromptu trip to Moscow that recalibrated India’s multi-alignment policy and rankled the West.

Leading influencers like former American Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul and British journalist Isabel Oakeshott fearmongered about Indian-Russian ties immediately after his visit, which they falsely portrayed as a betrayal of its values and an alleged pivot towards Russia instead of a rebalancing. The larger context was that Indo-US ties had deteriorated over the latter’s hosting of a Delhi-designated terrorist-separatist that the Justice Department claimed was the target of an Indian assassination plot.

Biden had also declined Prime Minister Modi’s invitation from September to participate in mid-January’s Republic Day celebrations in the middle of December at the same time as his government hosted Pakistani Chief Of Army Staff Asim Munir, both of which further boded ill for bilateral ties. Over the past month, two major information warfare narratives were unveiled against India after the Washington Post claimed that it’s meddling in US affairs while Semafor claimed that its leader “purged” the parliament.

Neither is true and both are misportayals of reality, but they still served to establish the false pretext for justifying the US’ own meddling in India ahead of its national elections in spring, the operation of which is driven by the desire to punish Prime Minister Modi for his independent foreign policy. McFaul and Oakeshott’s follow-up pieces were therefore the latest manifestations of these newfound Western smears against India’s international reputation.

This backdrop is important to keep in mind since it helps explain the latest scandal about Ukraine’s alleged use of Indian shells against Russia. The Eurasian Times reported that “The United Arab Emirates and Armenia have been the known customers of 155 mm shells. An unnamed European country, most probably Poland or Slovenia, recently purchased the artillery shells”, which are leads worth pursuing. Both have close ties with India, but Armenia is pivoting towards the West while the UAE remains neutral.

At the end of last year, “Lavrov Warned Armenia Against Ceding Its National Security To NATO”, which was Russia’s most detailed and harshest response yet to its formal CSTO mutual defense ally’s pivot towards that enemy bloc following the years-long process that accelerated since last September. By contrast, Emirati President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan defied the West to accept President Putin’s invitation to be his guest of honor at June’s St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF).

The Russian leader then described the UAE as his country’s “main trade partner in the Arab world” last month, while just last week the UAE put its excellent relations with Russia to good use in mediate a prisoner swap between Moscow and Kiev, after which it reaffirmed its desire to mediate peace talks. Emirati entities have also been sanctioned by the US for allegedly violating that country’s anti-Russian sanctions regime.

Given this state of affairs, it’s unimaginable that the UAE would have re-exported Indian shells to Poland or Slovenia to pass along to Ukraine at the US’ behest, and much more believable that Armenia was the one that did this instead. If that’s the case, then this would mean that Armenia was only pretending to practice a clumsy balancing act between NATO and India, but was only manipulating the second into sending it more equipment that it then intended to indirectly transfer to Ukraine to help the first.

India innocently thought that Armenia was increasingly relying on it as a replacement for Russia amidst the Western-instigated tiff with its traditional security partner in order to maintain some element of sovereignty during this process instead of becoming disproportionately dependent on NATO. Having projected its own multi-alignment paradigm onto its partner, India accordingly provided Armenia with a widening array of defense equipment (presumably via Iran), only for Yerevan to ultimately betray Delhi.

Poland was likely the third party that passed along these shells to Ukraine considering its leading role as NATO’s military conduit for waging its proxy war on Russia through that former Soviet Republic. It’s possible in theory though that they were passed along by Slovenia, but even in that case, they would have likely transited across Poland anyhow. For all intents and purposes, it’s a safe to assume that Poland was most responsible for facilitating Armenia’s transfer of Indian shells to Ukraine at the US’ behest.

Regardless of however long they were in that country, it’s worth reminding the reader that the footage was only shared on social media immediately after EAM Jaishankar’s trip to Moscow where he recalibrated India’s multi-alignment policy in light of newfound troubles in its ties with the US. This scandal also occurred against the backdrop of the US’ increasingly intense information warfare campaign against India ahead of this spring’s national elections.

It's therefore possible that the US orchestrated the timing of this footage’s release in a desperate attempt to sow divisions in the decades-long special and privileged Indian-Russian strategic partnership that was immensely strengthened after that visit. This working hypothesis aligns with the recently established precedent of American meddling and smears against India as revenge for Prime Minister Modi’s independent foreign policy, particularly his refusal to condemn and sanction Russia.

Armenia is unlikely to have decided on its own to betray India, nor to have devised this complicated logistics scheme all by itself for indirectly arming Ukraine in support of NATO’s proxy war on Russia. Rather, it’s much more likely that the US told Armenia to do this in exchange for either something tangible or more vague promises of support, which in any case was agreed to by Prime Minister Pashinyan since this couldn’t have taken place without his authorization.

His in-person participation in the informal CIS heads of state meeting in St. Petersburg late last month, which was a notable exception to his informal boycott of Russian-organized economic, political, and security events amidst his Western-instigated tiff with that country, could have therefore been a ruse. Knowing now what probably took place before that with respect to Armenia’s indirect arming of Ukraine via Poland at the US’ behest, he probably participated in order to preemptively deflect accusations.

By pretending to reconsider his country’s pro-Western pivot and making a pretense of appearing to be pragmatic by taking part in that meeting, Pashinyan thought that he could strategically disarm President Putin, though the Russian leader is much too wise to be fooled by this charlatan. Prime Minister Modi is also a very wise leader too and is accordingly expected to reconsider his country’s military ties with Armenia if evidence emerges in support of the hypothesis that it transferred Indian shells to Ukraine.

In that event, this incident could serve to push through the Indian-Azeri rapprochement that was proposed here at the start of the year, thus unlocking those two’s geo-economic potential and making the North-South Transport Corridor (NSTC) in which they both participate more strategic than ever. If that happens, then Armenia would lose its reliable Indian military partner and become completely dependent on NATO, though it should have thought about that before going along with this scheme.

While the West would be delighted to solidify its full-spectrum control over Armenia, its perception managers will likely spin any Indian complaints against that country and possible downscaling of their military ties (if not outright abolishment) as supposed “proof” of its “anti-Western agenda”. This false narrative would build upon the emerging one pushed by McFaul and Oakeshott misportraying India as “pro-Russian, anti-Western, and therefore a rogue state” in order to justify more meddling and smears.

With that scenario in mind, it might very well have been the case that the US orchestrated this scandal not only to help complete Armenia’s pro-Western pivot and stir trouble in Indo-Russo ties, but also to provoke the aforesaid response in order to make its anti-Indian campaign more believable. The resultant optics could manipulate Westerners into supporting more muscular moves against India in the future, perhaps even as far as sanctions, which could further worsen bilateral relations across the coming year.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/did-arme ... ian-shells
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sat Jan 06, 2024 1:24 pm

The 2021 Crimean Platform Joint Declaration and the war
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/06/2024

Image

On August 23, 2021, in kyiv, the main Western states and their closest allies officially approved the creation of the Crimean Platform, a strategic project promoted by Ukraine since the end of 2020 to try to regain the initiative in claiming sovereignty over that territory. At the aforementioned Kiev summit, held at the level of heads of state and government, a Joint Declaration was adopted that sought nothing less than to delimit “ the framework of international policy on Crimea .” The NATO dimension of the initiative is palpable, as reflected in the precedent of the constitution on April 27 of that year , by the NATO Parliamentary Assembly, of an informal group to support the Crimea Platform “ to continue showing the firm stance of the Assembly regarding the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine .”

Without prejudice to some issues worthy of consideration, related to respect for human rights, there are three main aspects of the Joint Declaration of the states participating in the International Crimean Platform ( Declaration from now on) that are susceptible to critical consideration .

Firstly, the document's exposition of reasons and principles highlights the implicit denial of the role of the United Nations Security Council with respect to the maintenance of international peace and security. It is thus striking that the Declaration does not make any reference to the UN Security Council. In reality, the proposal of the International Platform is presented, above all, as an attempt by a series of countries to delimit the way of resolving a certain international conflict, that of Crimea, outside the Security Council. This is undoubtedly the most developed example in recent years of the intention to convert a coalition of countries, led by the United States and NATO, into an effective expression of the international community outside the competent international body.

Secondly, and largely as a consequence of the will to act politically outside the Security Council, the decision model for action proposed by the group of countries that decide to act in this unilateral way to impose their political vision is by completely removed from the model of approach to the resolution of similar conflicts that has characterized the Security Council , particularly in relation to the case of Kosovo.

Taking the Kosovo conflict as a reference, for example, Security Council Resolution 1244 of June 10, 1999 was based on the reaffirmation of the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and , at the same time, in the call for substantial autonomy and meaningful self-administration for Kosovo within the aforementioned Republic.

To this end, it established, pending the arrival of “a definitive solution ”, a provisional framework of autonomy and self-government in Kosovo within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia that was based on two elements: the final signature by the representative delegation of the Albanian rebels, at that time without institutions controlled by them in the territory, of the Rambouillet agreements (imposed, de facto, by the United States and NATO); and the approval of the process by the member states of the Security Council, including those with a permanent presence and the right to veto in this body. The renunciation of the veto by countries such as Russia was linked to the coherence of the foundations of the Rambouillet agreements with those of Resolution 1244, especially with regard to respect for the sovereignty and integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

Respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Yugoslavia was also expressly reflected in the annexes to Resolution 1244. It was in Annex 1, relating to the agreements of the foreign ministers of the G-8, which then included the Federation. Russian; and it was also in Annex 2, which outlined the principles for the final agreement to be achieved. In this sense, point number 5 made express mention of the substantial autonomy that Kosovo would have to have within the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (or any other successor state, in terms of international legislation).

In total contrast with an approach like that of Kosovo, in which a document (the Rambouillet Agreement) is established as a reference for the solution of the conflict in which the rebellious party opposed to the state authorities is recognized as a political actor. affected sovereign, and in which the resolution is made with the participation of all states with the right to veto in the Security Council, the decisions proposed by the Crimean International Platform are based on two completely opposite facts.

On the one hand, the total absence of participation, or reference to said participation in the process, of the representative institutions of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the City of Sevastopol, which are de facto the ones that initiate the process of separation of the State of Ukraine and the incorporation of its territory into the Russian Federation. Unlike the violent separatists of the UÇK/KLA, the opinion of the autonomous and legal institutions of Crimea, which acted without ever resorting to violence against any possible opposition, has no value for the Declaration states .

On the other hand, the suppression of any pretense of real participation in the debate by the Russian Federation also stands out. This aspect is reflected in the lack of Russian participation in the Platform debates, as well as in the marginalization of the Security Council in the entire debate process. Although the Declaration continually focuses on what the Russian Federation must do to resolve the conflict, there is hardly a final reference in it that calls for Russian collaboration, which requires that Russia “ constructively participate in the activities of the International Crimean Platform aimed at ending the temporary occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol . As in Volodymyr Zelensky's peace plan to end the current war, the only participation Ukraine expects from Russia is unconditional surrender without even prior negotiation. In neither case is the opinion of the population an aspect to be taken into account for kyiv.

In fact, the essential objective of the Declaration is to underline “ that any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol as an integral part of the sovereign territory of Ukraine is not and will not be recognized .” And, to this end, the signatory states will maintain “ pressure on Russia ” to reestablish “ Ukraine's control over the territory ,” with consideration of “ new political, diplomatic and restrictive measures against the Russian Federation .” The significance of this pressure on a specific sanctions policy was soon reflected in the actions of the Crimean Platform states, one of whose five axes is the “ adequate implementation and reinforcement ” of these sanctions.

In their attempt to legitimize this policy, however, the signatories - especially those linked to NATO - face an important contradiction since the majority of them recognized the secession of Kosovo, outside of Resolution 1244. And here it is where the third fundamental critical aspect in the Kiev Declaration of August 2021 can be located: the total absence of consideration and reference to the Opinion on Kosovo of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and its foundations , in particular the thesis that the declaration of independence of that territory could not be considered illegal in terms of international law. For the signatories of the Declaration , the ICJ Opinion does not exist in terms of the debate on the Crimean issue. But, nevertheless, the content of this Opinion is decisive in locating the conflict in international law, as it has been interpreted by the ICJ.

In this sense, it is difficult to deny that the secession of Crimea in 2014, and its subsequent incorporation into the Russian Federation, adapts to the ICJ thesis that declarations of independence formulated by the representatives of a certain people in the territory do not may be considered illegal under international law. Although there are other political and legal aspects that must be considered, the Russian Federation has adapted to the content of the ICJ Opinion to inform the process of Crimea's incorporation.

The different states may or may not accept the ICJ's approach, or the way - undoubtedly opportunistic - in which it has been used by Russia, but it is a verifiable legal fact, not hidden, of course, by those who previously promoted secession. of Kosovo. Its position in favor of the secession of that Serbian territory only finds a basis for defense in the aforementioned Opinion which, in a way that is contradictory to its interests, also allows - at least from a plausible perspective - the defense of the referendum held in Crimea, the decision of secession and subsequent incorporation into the Russian Federation.

To the three criticisms mentioned, one could undoubtedly add a reference to the incoherence of the complaint of abusive practices by the Russian Federation in Crimea against the population, a complaint that could be transferred against the State of Ukraine. Within the territory controlled by said state, its actions against social groups opposed to the line of the nationalist government since 2014 are characterized, point by point, and in an increasingly abusive manner, with the aspects reported in relation to the actions of the Federation Russian in Crimea.

One of the main contradictions of the Crimean Platform's claim to act outside the central organ of the United Nations, the Security Council, was its supposed intention to " establish the International Crimean Platform as a format for consultation and coordination " to " put peacefully end the temporary occupation of Crimea and restore Ukrainian control over this territory.

The Platform's August 2021 declaration undoubtedly constitutes one of the factors leading to the hasty February 2022 Special Military Operation by the Russian Federation. The events of the first months of this operation show an intention on the part of Russia to reach a quick political agreement that, without putting Ukraine's pro-EU destiny at risk, tries to guarantee Ukrainian neutrality and acceptance of the secession of territories. such as Donetsk and Lugansk oblasts and Crimea.

The failure of the Special Military Operation to quickly achieve its objectives is subsequently followed by the parallel failure of the State of Ukraine to advance during its 2023 counteroffensive, despite multimillion-dollar support from Western countries and NATO. The intention to peacefully end the temporary occupation of Crimea has become, as can be seen in the Declaration of August 2023, a unilateral exposition of the disasters of war, without even reflecting in it the ultimate and real will. of the participants: the military victory in eastern Ukraine in a war that has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths among the combatants.

In a context of indeterminate final results, one does seem unequivocal: the conversion of the Security Council into a completely irrelevant body, at least in relation to the war in Ukraine. If the lack of mention of this Council was surprising in the 2021 Declaration , in the 2023 Declaration what would have been surprising is that any of the participants in the Crimean Platform could have even thought of remembering its lost role in the search for peace and security in the world.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/06/la-de ... la-guerra/

Google Translator

******

The demining of Ukraine will be carried out by a scandalous US company associated with BlackRock
January 6, 2024
Rybar

At the end of November, it became known that the American company Tetra Tech began work on mine clearance in the Kiev , Odessa , Sumy , Kherson , and Kharkov regions.

At the end of 2022, Tetra Tech received a $47.6 million contract from the US State Department for humanitarian demining in Ukraine. In particular, the company will do this on agricultural land.

Interestingly, a memorandum of cooperation between Tetra Tech and the Ukrainian Ministry of Energy was signed during the international conference “Energy for the recovery of Ukraine”, which takes place in Warsaw . We have already written about the fact that the Poles are trying more than others to win on contracts for the reconstruction of Independence Square in a large article .

However, despite loud statements on the Internet that a “leading global company” will be engaged in mine clearance in Ukraine, Tetra Tech is not doing well not only with its image, but also with the same demining contracts.

Clean where it is already clean
Since 2004, the federal government has spent more than $1 billion to clean up and remediate one of the most highly toxic and radioactive sites in the United States, the Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco. The facility was home to the Naval Radiological Defense Laboratory for decades, from 1946 to 1969, and large Navy warships were towed there from the Pacific Ocean, where they were stationed near nuclear testing.

When the US authorities decided to transfer this site to the city, the issue of the need to clean up radiation and toxic chemicals became acute. Much of this work was carried out by Tetra Tech, one of the largest refurbishment companies in the world, with revenues of $2.6 billion in 2016. Tetra Tech was paid hundreds of millions of dollars in public funds to test and move highly contaminated soil.

Only in 2016, the company was accused of falsifying the results of soil samples . EPA comments released by the Office of Public Officials for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) stated that 90 to 97% of soil sample results are "neither reliable nor reasonable."

Despite attempts to deny the charges, in May 2018, two former executives involved in the cleanup of radioactive contamination at the old Navy Yard pleaded guilty to falsifying soil samples. In January 2019, the US Department of Justice sued Tetra Tech, accusing the engineering company of submitting false billing claims to the US Navy based on falsified soil and building testing data.

Radioactive train
In February 2023, about 50 cars of a Norfolk Southern freight train carrying highly toxic chemicals derailed and caught fire in Ohio. Among them were strong poisons that have carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects on humans.

The very next morning, Norfolk Southern employees noticed a liquid spill in the Sulfur Run and Leslie Run waterways and installed booms and retaining dams to separate floating contaminants. Toxic substances entered the Ohio River, which is the largest tributary of the Mississippi River. Local residents within a radius of 2 km were evacuated; in the area of ​​infection there was a massive death of fish, chickens and fox diseases . But this is only what is known for certain.

So Tetra Tech is accused of hiding the scale of a man-made disaster in Ohio. Even though the Department of Justice joined in a lawsuit against Tetra Tech for falsifying shipyard sample results, the Environmental Protection Agency in Ohio allowed Norfolk Southern to hire Tetra Tech to test the air.

Unsurprisingly, all of the firm's tests came back negative, and the railroad and Environmental Protection Agency say the area is safe. The media noted that the samples were not handled in accordance with federal standards, and experts actually considered them “careless” and “amateur.” However, the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed that the samples were not properly preserved or acidified, but were considered "acceptable".

Those critical of Tetra Tech point out that the situation highlights the alarming level of corporate takeover of America that always prioritize profits over people and safety, regardless of which party occupies the White House.

In this regard, we note that Norfolk Southern and Tetra Tech Inc. connected by special shareholders - Vanguard and BlackRock .

“Controversial” mine clearance in Syria
The US State Department gave a $48 million grant to Tetra Tech for demining Syria in 2018. In addition to the fact that its approval was rushed in the final days of the Obama administration in order to lock it in before the inauguration of new US leader Donald Trump, there were many complaints about why it was a grant and not a contract.

Besides the story being strange and the grant being "controversial", two Tetra Tech employees died during the mission . This was likely due to the company's "limited experience" in munitions removal, as well as the "unusual circumstances" under which it was selected for the lucrative IED removal job.

Interestingly, the news of the workers' deaths came amid an internal State Department review of a much larger contract with the same Tetra Tech to defuse improvised explosive devices in hot spots around the world. At the same time, the company received the appointment from the State Department's Political-Military Directorate for Weapons Control (PMWRA). They did not comment on why they did not give other companies with extensive demining experience , such as Janus Global Operations, Optima, FSD/Crosstech, Mechem, UXB, DynCorps or NGOs, the opportunity to bid on the Syrian project.

The contract, worth up to $850 million , was subject to a formal internal review after a report by the conservative Free Beacon raised questions about the firm's safety record and lack of experience in the field.

Conclusion
As a result, it is clear that in the person of Tetra Tech, another project of BlackRock, a company that already practically bought out the country, has come to Ukraine to make money. At the same time, it is likely that in reality nothing will have to be demined in those areas, given Tetra Tech’s talent for earning hundreds of millions from nothing.

https://rybar.ru/razminirovanie-ukrainy ... lack-rock/

The next military exercise of NATO troops in Lithuania
January 6, 2024
Rybar

Image

The Baltic neighbors of Russia and Belarus traditionally continued military preparations in the new year and improved their fleet of military equipment. A significant share in the training of the Lithuanian Armed Forces continues to be occupied by instructors, concerns, manufacturers, military leaders and other military elements from NATO countries and the United States.

Artillery training
On December 19, at the Armalenai airfield (Shilut district, western part of Lithuania, 10 km from the Kaliningrad region), a training exercise was held for the 1st fire battery of the artillery battalion named after. M. Pyačiulionis. The instructors were specialists from the fire control center of the 1st battalion of the 9th field artillery regiment of the US Armed Forces. The Americans were shown M50 howitzers, a fire control center calculation system, surveillance equipment and compasses.

Firing from mortar crews
At the military training ground. Brigadier General Kazys Veverskis (Kazlu-rud district, central part of Lithuania) underwent training on mortar guns (M60 light mortar) of the 2nd, 3rd and 6th detachments of the voluntary regional defense forces of the Lithuanian Armed Forces. The coordination of the strikes was carried out by a reconnaissance group using UAVs.

The calculations used three types of mines: high-explosive fragmentation, smoke and lighting.

Exercises of the "Riflemen Union"
On December 17, in the Radviliši region (northwestern part of Lithuania), representatives of the 608th and 601st companies of the paramilitary organization “Lithuanian Riflemen Union” conducted a tactical orientation exercise “Save Christmas”.

According to the script, the evil Grinch and his associates decided to kidnap Santa. However, there is still hope, as the young archers have been ordered to find Santa Claus, his gifts and save Christmas. Minors and pensioners took part in the exercises.

On the same days, representatives of the 6th detachment of the Lithuanian Riflemen's Union (Šiauliai, northwestern Lithuania) conducted training for UAV operators.

Procurement and supplies of the Lithuanian army
The Lithuanian Ministry of Regional Protection reported on the completion of the first stage of the acquisition of JLTV SUVs produced by the American company Oshkosh Defense. On the evening of December 29, 50 SUVs were unloaded at the Klaipeda seaport. 150 units were previously delivered.

In 2019, an agreement was signed with the United States for the purchase of 200 cars. But in 2022, the Lithuanians entered into an additional agreement for the supply of another 300 units of equipment. In total, the Americans will supply the Baltic states with 500 SUVs.

In addition, in the last days of 2023, Lithuanian warehouses were replenished with Spanish 120-mm mortars "EXPAL 120-MX2-SM" manufactured by EXPAL Systems, SA. The purchase agreement was signed in 2022. The total cost of the project was 9.8 million euros.

At the same time, optical sights manufactured by the Canadian company Raytheon Elcan Optical Technologies are being purchased for the needs of the Lithuanian Armed Forces. The optics will be used on small arms of 5.56 mm and 7.62 mm calibers. The cost of the project is 34 million euros. The first deliveries will begin in the summer of 2024.

Also of interest is the signing on December 20 of a preliminary cooperation agreement with the Administration of Defense Resources of the Swedish Armed Forces. The document expresses the intention to strengthen Lithuania's air defense potential by purchasing a mobile short-range air defense system. It is planned that the first components of the system can be delivered to Lithuania in 2025, and the entire system by 2027.

It is worth noting that the Lithuanians continue to support the so-called. Ukraine. On December 20, the Ministry of Regional Defense reported on the delivery of another cargo of military aid to the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Mention is made of household supplies in the field and several tens of thousands of dry rations.

Also on December 21, the Seimas of Lithuania signed a decision on the participation of the Lithuanian Armed Forces in international operations in 2024-2025. It was noted that they will focus on training military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (from 60 to 100 Lithuanian specialists) in various formats, as well as participation in international operations of NATO and the EU (13 operations-missions in total). At the same time, up to 318 Lithuanian military personnel or civilian personnel will be able to participate in international operations.

Thus, it is absolutely clear that the Baltic states will continue to prepare for military operations and train not only their soldiers, but also the population, which has recently been steadily involved in various maneuvers conducted in populated areas and with the involvement of civilians.

https://rybar.ru/ocherednye-voennye-uch ... za-dekabr/

Google Translator

******

Now It Is Becoming...
... a comedy.


It’s been two months since ex-American M-1s tanks arrived in Ukraine. And two months since we’ve seen any evidence of the tanks. It’s not clear what Ukraine is doing with its 31 Abrams, but it is clear what it should be doing: up-armoring them to resist attacks by Russia’s explosive-laden first-person-view drones. FPV drones are everywhere all the time along the 600-mile front line of Russia’s 23-month wider war on Ukraine. They now rival mines as the biggest threats to tanks on both sides. It’s all but inevitable that Ukraine will lose some of its four-person, 68-ton M-1s. The 2000s-vintage M-1A1SAs that Ukraine received are some of the best-protected tanks in the world, but they’re not invulnerable to attack.

In related news, it is also good for M-1s to lose a couple of pounds... ahem, I mean, 10-15 tons, to get a lower profile, to get new tracks with a better traction, get a turret's effective anti-FPV screen and, in general, to stop being M-1 and become something which is suited for modern war not for rolling over incompetent and demoralized Iraqi infantry in ideal desert conditions.

Per sights and other "avionics"--they are all about the same in most modern tanks and Russian T-90M Proryv and T-14 Armata are fully netcentric tanks capable to communicate and even provide targeting not only within homogeneous tank (armor) unit but even for aircraft and AD complexes. Ah yes, all (ALL) Russian tanks are capable to launch a very nasty ATGM Reflex through their guns, M-1 cannot. So, the great military "expert" from Forbes David Axe can wet dream whatever he wants about those 31 VSU Abrams but they ain't getting to the battlefield where they will be blown up by Russians and then the pictures and videos of them burning will be gladly shared by Russian military with global community.

I mean, for many going through the realization of NATO weapon systems being NO GOOD in modern war is a difficult moral journey, but, believe me, for me also when I fully realized the depth of Pentagon's incompetence it was a shocking discovery. Here are German Welt's journos and "experts" suddenly recognized that Patriots PAC-2,3 in 404... suck and cannot stop X-32 cruise missiles. Welcome to the Putin Krieg, morons.



Of course, X-32 while being extremely high supersonic and stand-off is still not hypersonic missiles. Here is me 4 years ago explaining this simple fact that and explaining that no NATO AD system, naval or ground based, can stop the salvo of X-32, which also since then underwent even deadlier modification.

The reason for that is a simple fact that large and expensive surface combatants are not survivable in the modern naval combat, unless they have weapon systems which can fight REAL hypersonic weapons such as fully combat ready and deployed Kinzhal, 3M22 Zircon or even nearing M=5 X-32 anti-shipping missiles. That is the real hypersonic threat, not those exotic Avangard gliders which merely exist to forestall the appearance in the future of similar systems in the United States and, if it ever materializes (I doubt it, but who knows) some sort of strategic anti-missile system. Unlike Avangard, which is a nuclear deterrent, another one in Russia's arsenal, Kinzhal, X-32 and Zircon are actual weapons designed specifically to fulfill a classic Sea Denial (or, if one wants an exercise in Pentagonese from me--Battle Space Denial) in both conventional or nuclear variants. They, not the Avangard, are the weapons which, being tactical-operational ones, achieved already a strategic and even doctrinal effect and these weapons are extremely precise. United States knows that. Liana, as Shoigu reported recently, namely last Peon NKS is nearing completion (in Russian), that's what is going to complete creation of Liana, which will (already does) provide detection, tracking and targeting for hypersonic and supersonic weapons against any targets.

People love to talk about hypersonic Kinzhal, which performed brilliantly, but the salvo of X-32s which actually carry false targets and extremely ECM resistant is also not survivable. Unless, of course, it is in 404 and Western media, but then again, they still cannot wrap their brains around the outcome of SMO which unfolds while I type it here. Russia also launched more satellites in the last couple of weeks and is gaining a much better situational awareness and targeting certainty in preparation for... what? Make your own conclusions. The SMO is a paradigm shift for which Russia was preparing since 2008. Recall, I wrote this book 5 years ago:

Image

In it I explained that physics and mathematics for NATO' victory in modern warfare are absent and that combined West operates legacy systems based on self-aggrandizing mythology (a euphemism for lie) of its part in WW II and, of course, BS of the Gulf War. The worst part for the West (USA generally) is that this cannot be changed because the clockwork of Western views on warfare is broken and doesn't work.

(More at link.)

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2024/01 ... oming.html

*******

After Military Collapse, Kiev Bets on Terrorism

Lucas Leiroz

January 5, 2024

Recent attacks in Belgorod show how the neo-Nazi regime is focused on killing civilians.

A major military escalation is taking place in the special operation zone – and even outside of it. Moscow is launching massive attacks against Ukraine after the demilitarized region of Belgorod was hit in terrorist actions by Kiev. Faced with military fiasco and the impossibility of continuing to fight through appropriate means, the neo-Nazi regime relies on terrorism as a war tactic against Russia.

On December 30, Ukrainian forces launched a deadly attack with cluster weapons on Belgorod, killing dozens and injuring hundreds of people, including several children. There was no military target in the region to justify the attack, making it a deliberate action against civilians, which is why the attitude can be considered a crime under international law.

Russian diplomats at the UN called for an emergency meeting on the topic and Secretary General Antonio Guterres himself condemned Kiev’s actions. However, as expected, no consensus was reached on punishing Ukraine for its crimes, as Western states absolutely support the actions of the neo-Nazi regime.

In the following days, Ukraine continued to bomb Belgorod and generate more victims. In response, Russia tightened its actions, hitting several military, industrial and critical infrastructure targets in numerous Ukrainian cities, including Kharkov, Kiev and even Lvov. Among the targets, decision-making and logistics centers used in planning attacks against Belgorod were destroyed. So, undoubtedly, recent days have been marked by a military escalation that could be decisive regarding the future of the conflict.

The Ukrainian side is the one that suffers most from this type of escalatory situation. Unlike the Russians, who are only using a small percentage of their military potential, Ukraine does not have the capacity to continue fighting in the long term. Since 2022, Kiev has had great difficulty facing high-intensity frictions, constantly suffering heavy losses. Especially after the failed “counteroffensive” attempt last year, the situation has further deteriorated, with the neo-Nazi regime collapsing militarily.

In military sciences, terrorism is seen as a type of tactic used by belligerent agents incapable of facing a regular war situation. This explains why Kiev is committed to increasing terrorist attacks and generating more and more civilian victims. The attacks on Belgorod and other Russian demilitarized zones clearly show how close the Ukrainian regime is to definitive defeat, having collapsed militarily and being unable to reach any target other than innocent and unarmed civilians.

It would be wrong to say that this phenomenon is something recent. Terrorism has always been a common practice for the Ukrainian military. Although the Western media says otherwise, in fact, Kiev has always been at a disadvantage in direct conflict, not being able to face hostilities in accordance with international standards of humanitarian law. This is why Ukrainian intelligence and armed forces carried out terrorist maneuvers against Russian public figures and targeted non-military infrastructure such as the Kakhovka dam and the Crimean Bridge.

However, the use of these criminal practices tends to become more and more frequent from now on, as Kiev is facing a situation of absolute military ruin. The so-called “counteroffensive” was the neo-Nazi regime’s main bet in 2023 and created great expectations in Western public opinion about a possible “game change” in the military scenario of the conflict. Western propagandists even commented that Kiev would “retake” the regions liberated by Russian forces – including Crimea.

But none of these expectations came true. Russian forces were efficient in protecting their defense lines and preventing any Ukrainian territorial advance. As admitted by Russian authorities, Moscow’s main goal in 2023 was to neutralize the Ukrainian counteroffensive and this objective was evidently achieved successfully. Tens of thousands of Ukrainians died in the fighting, mainly due to the heavy use of artillery by the Russians. Kiev’s death numbers exceeded half a million soldiers, in addition to massive losses of military equipment, leading the regime to collapse and strategic paralysis.

From then on, the Russian victory began to be admitted even by some Western media outlets. Hopes for a reversal became virtually nil, even among supporters of the regime, which obviously further diminished the popularity of military aid among Western taxpayers. The only justification for continuing to support Ukraine, despite all the side effects of Western measures, was the possibility of a military victory – with the absence of such possibility, it is natural that there is now public pressure to stop sending money and weapons to Kiev.

So, to prevent aid from running out, Ukraine is rushing to show its sponsors that it is “still possible” to defeat Russia. Kiev is not in a position to surrender or negotiate peace with Moscow, as it is a proxy regime without any sovereignty, so its only hope is to receive even more weapons to continue fighting, even without changing the final outcome of the war. So that public opinion does not stop believing in the possibilities of victory, it is vital that Ukraine at least appears to be inflicting some damage on Russia, which explains the recent moves.

Ukraine is extremely weak on the battlefield and does not have the necessary conditions to engage in long-term attritions, which is why it chooses civilian targets and terrorist methods to try to convince its Western partners that it is inflicting damage on the enemy. The attacks in Belgorod are an example of this. Kiev is trying to tell the Western public that it is still “worth” spending money on weapons for its troops. Ukrainian propaganda wants to say that it is reaching Russia “deep inside” – ignoring that the victims are innocent civilians and non-military infrastructure.

Another purpose of these attacks is to encourage an unprecedented escalation. In the current circumstances, it is convenient for the Ukrainian government to try to bring the war to its ultimate consequences. Therefore, with these attacks Kiev also hopes to provoke large-scale Russian retaliatory actions, with the hope that this will motivate direct NATO intervention in the conflict.

However, the Russians are not “taking the bait”. Moscow responds to Ukrainian provocations with high-precision strikes against strategic targets. Instead of escalating the war to an all-out level, the Russians retaliate by neutralizing Ukraine’s ability to attack. So, the more terrorism is used against the Russians, the more Ukraine will be harming itself.

At some point, Ukrainian decision-makers will have to understand that, in addition to being anti-humanitarian and illegal, it is pointless to adopt terrorist methods against a much stronger militarily adversary. The only real alternative for Kiev is negotiation in accordance with Russian peace terms.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... terrorism/

*******

Under the Radar: Major CIA Revelations Expose Secret Agreements and Boundaries in Ukraine

ImageSIMPLICIUS THE THINKER
JAN 5, 2024

This past July, one of the most remarkable articles of the entire Ukrainian war flew under the radar. I’ve had it sitting on my tab for weeks now, but could never quite fit the information in. It is so eye-opening, and dispels so many narratives in the West, that I thought it deserving of its own writeup; particularly because it has flown so under the radar for whatever reason, causing most people to miss its many juicy revelations.

The article is the following from Newsweek:

Image

https://www.newsweek.com/2023/07/21/exc ... 10355.html
Its age does not detract from its significance as the information therein is more pertinent than ever—which is precisely why I chose to do an exposé on it now.

The reason is, as the Ukrainian war presently enters a new watershed phase characterized by the slow-acceptance of Ukraine’s now de facto losing position, a proverbial windmill of narratives is churned out from the pro-UA side seeking to somehow reconcile the various cognitive dissonances created by their inability to understand how it is possible that the mighty NATO bloc could be losing to Russia.

This results in their proposing increasingly convoluted theories as to why the US may be “deliberately sabotaging” Ukraine’s otherwise guaranteed “victory”. For instance, a common coping narrative you might hear these days is that the US “fears” Ukraine winning a total and ‘decisive’ victory over Russia because this would cause Russia to “fracture” into many small feudal states, which could precipitate an existential crisis as the warlords of the new states would vie for the now unaccounted for nuclear weapons, etc. Though it is obviously preposterous, this is the type of narrative being floated on pro-UA thinkspaces to try and explain away the US’s perceived weakness and ‘cowardice’ in the face of Russia’s growing dominance.

They simply cannot understand how it is possible that the US would not stand up to the putatively “weak” Russia. In their mind, addled by two years of propaganda characterizing Russia as a totally dysfunctional failed state with an unimaginably weak military, it’s simply impossible to reconcile these two quotients. So the only logical inference is that it is an intentional act by the US—the only remaining question being why the US would intentionally condition Ukraine’s loss.

But the article dispels such fantasies and reveals some of the real reasons behind US’s seemingly perplexing posture.

Firstly, the article revolves around—as per usual—the statements of an anonymous “senior intelligence official” from the Biden administration, who is “directly involved in Ukraine policy planning,” and notes that the topics discussed therein are ‘highly classified matters’.

The first significant offering is the following:

Image

The second official says that while some in the Agency want to speak more openly about its renewed significance, that is not likely to happen. "The corporate CIA worries that too much bravado about its role could provoke Putin," the intelligence official says.

You can see the common theme of the constant prudential tip-toeing around Russia’s redlines so as not to excessively provoke Putin.

They go on to express that the CIA is keen to distance itself from any of Ukraine’s more provocative actions, like the Nordstream attack, or strikes on Russian territory.

But the key portion of the article, which comes next, is the admission that Biden dispatched CIA director Burns to Russia on the eve of the invasion in late 2021. They had been watching Russia’s troop buildups, and in essence sent Burns to deliver a final warning of consequences should Russia proceed with an invasion. Though Putin ended up “snubbing” the CIA head by staying in a Sochi resort and refusing to meet him in person, he did take his secure phone call from Sochi.

What comes next is the heart of the entire article and is one of the most significant and remarkable admissions of the entire war. It is a must read:

Image

Read that several times to comprehend the gravity of it, as this one statement alone single handedly explains and encapsulates the entire dynamic of the war.

Once again I’m forced to be the bearer of the news that not all is as it seems on the surface. Russia isn’t the 10 foot giant some have built it up to be, nor is it a dwarf. Likewise, the US isn’t some uncompromisingly all-powerful entity that does what it wants at all times with zero qualms or concern for repercussions.

This may be a difficult point for some to swallow; after all, how is it possible in actual practice that the US could be fearful of Russia’s reprisal? After all, the US has its vaunted fleets that sail unchallenged through every sea; just the US’s naval air wing alone, believe it or not, makes up the second largest airforce in the entire world. That’s right, just the Navy, which itself pales in comparison to the Airforce, has more planes than the entire Russian airforce. What could such an imposing powerhouse possibly fear from little ol’ Russia?

It stems from the misunderstanding of the actual logistical nuances of the US’s force projection capabilities in the European theater. The people confused by these revelations are those who easily fell prey to a very generalized and caricaturized image of the US military’s operations therein. They’ve developed a blanket image of US forces being able to operate all over Europe, instantly bringing to bear endless stealth craft, unlimited unstoppable missiles, hundreds of thousands of troops, etc.

But that’s far from reality. The US is direly overstretched; its most critical bases in Europe—the ones actually capable of fielding the types of platforms that could actually do anything against Russia, are highly vulnerable. The US has further learned from the Ukrainian conflict that its most advanced air defense is virtually helpless against Russia’s top missiles. Reuters recently told us that Ukraine alone has 1/3 of all the air defense of the entire European continent, and yet Russia has no trouble penetrating it.

This is not to swing the pendulum too far to the other side and lay unrealistic claim to Russia being able to easily and instantly wipe out all of NATO—no, it’s simply to temper ideas about what US and NATO could realistically do to Russia. At the end of the day, a war between the two could very well be a stalemate but it would come at massive costs to the US/NATO, which is precisely the point that pro-UA supporters have made themselves blind to.

But the internal players—the CIA and policy makers—certainly understand this. Which is why they have openly made clear in the above article that a stringent set of ‘rules of the game’ have been laid out between the counterparties. Russia has obviously made it clear that it is willing to strike NATO assets that are assisting Ukraine if things are pushed too far. The US likewise now understands that Russia indisputably has the capability to do so. Thus they have shaken hands and agreed to limit the trampling of each other’s red lines. Russia will allow the US certain clandestine operations within the purview of the gentleman’s agreement, and the US in turn will venture to keep its rabid dog on a short leash and within the narrow bounds of the playpen.

We’ve long known and suspected that such rules extend beyond just this locus, and could explain why, for instance, Russia has limited its strikes on Ukrainian rail infrastructure, bridges, etc. We’ve long known the West still receives critical supply deliveries from both Russia and China—particularly of precious metals, rare earths, etc.—by rail through Ukraine. This is simply realpolitik at work, and all wars in history have operated under more or less similar conventions.

Just as a final thought experiment to drive the point home for those who remain skeptical or unconvinced. It’s not so much that NATO—in its most “ideal” and purest sense can’t defeat Russia. If we were absolutely certain that NATO could operate under the most ideal circumstances, with full solidarity and a united front, then sure. But the problem is, the real world simply doesn’t operate in “ideals” all the time, or even most of the time. NATO suffers from large internal disputes and friction on critical points.

The fear is the following: if Russia were to actually strike NATO territory, what would happen if unity fails, and some members refuse to risk the total annihilation of their state and citizens’ lives to protect another member merely for the sake of something they rationally know was that members’ fault? For instance, if Rzeszow, Poland was struck—why would Hungary and several other states risk being annihilated when they know full well that Poland is acting as a central hub of aggression against Russia, and that Russia could clearly be argued to be justified in protecting itself?

Do the pro-UA people understand what the consequences of a smaller NATO state’s involvement are? It could mean the literal nuclear annihilation of that state if they were to escalate Article 5 and bring NATO vs. Russia to the brink. Why would many of these smaller states want to risk their total erasure from existence for the sake of the scenario above? A single state or two cowing could create a cascade which ripples through the entire alliance. And guess what the implication of that would be?

It could be the total dissolution of NATO as an alliance.

Because once the point is reached where Article 5 has been exposed as an irrelevant non-starter, then NATO itself ceases to be—given that the article serves as NATO’s primary existential heart and soul.

Arestovich broached this very topic earlier today: (Video at link.)


So, getting back: knowing the above, why would the US risk such a confrontation that could potentially collapse all of NATO and undo decades of US hegemony over all of Europe? Such a disaster would lead to the US’s entire downfall—the loss of all influence and global power. Is that much of a risk worth it to play brinkmanship games against Russia for mere bragging rights and geopolitical ego?

No, of course not. US elites are smarter than that. Calculated risk is certainly operable in many circumstances, but when the stakes are that high, US planners know when to hedge and when to fold. The loss of Ukraine is not worth risking the loss of their entire global hegemonic order—it’s simply far too much Empire to lose.

That means the US is forced to play within the bounds of certain rules set by Russia. The article goes on to emphasize this:

"Zelensky has certainly outdone everyone else in getting what he wants, but Kyiv has had to agree to obey certain invisible lines as well," says the senior defense intelligence official. In secret diplomacy largely led by the CIA, Kyiv pledged not to use the weapons to attack Russia itself. Zelensky has said openly that Ukraine will not attack Russia.

Interestingly, we learn not everyone was on board:

Behind the scenes, dozens of countries also had to be persuaded to accept the Biden administration's limits. Some of these countries, including Britain and Poland, are willing to take more risk than the White House is comfortable with. Others—including some of Ukraine's neighbors—do not entirely share American and Ukrainian zeal for the conflict, do not enjoy unanimous public support in their anti-Russian efforts and do not want to antagonize Putin.

Two important points from the above. Firstly, it’s no surprise the UK and Poland are open to “taking more risk” than the US itself. At first glance this appears to imply the US to be the most skittish. But I’ve covered this angle before: the fact remains that the US has the most to lose. Of course the weak Poles would be full of bravado—they know if crap hits the fan, they can run to hide behind the US’s skirts.

The UK likewise hasn’t too much to fear from Russia owing to the fact that it doesn’t have much assets in Europe—at least compared to the US. And it’s situated far enough that, unlike even Poland, it needn’t fear much from medium range ballistic missile retaliation. It’s difficult to strike Britain—and therefore harm it in any way—without escalating to a far larger scale of conflict in general. Poland on the other hand can be struck at whim without even changing the tempo of the current war.

So the fact remains: such countries are full of bravado precisely because they have “daddy” to hide behind, and neither has as much to lose as the US. But since “the buck stops” with the US, the de facto NATO head doesn’t have the luxury to be so gung ho because it would be the US taking the brunt of Russia’s reprisal if things drastically turned left.

The second point confirms what I said earlier about NATO’s hidden internal disunity. They state openly that some of Ukraine’s “neighbors”—which can only refer to countries like Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, etc.—which are all NATO—do not share the same ‘zeal’ for the conflict and do not have public support for it. This means if a scenario developed as I described earlier, it would end precisely as I outlined: NATO disunity on Article 5 would risk tearing the entire alliance apart, and “exposing” its central and founding pillar as fraudulent and ineffective in practice. It’s too grave a risk for US to haphazardly take on.

The article adds more details:

"The CIA has been operating inside Ukraine, under strict rules, and with a cap on how many personnel can be in country at any one time," says another senior military intelligence official. "Black special operators are restricted from conducting clandestine missions, and when they do, it is within a very narrow scope." (Black special operations refers to those that are conducted clandestinely.)

Simply, CIA personnel can routinely go—and can do—what U.S. military personnel can't. That includes inside Ukraine. The military, on the other hand, is restricted from entering Ukraine, except under strict guidelines that have to be approved by the White House. This limits the Pentagon to a small number of Embassy personnel in Kyiv. Newsweek was unable to establish the exact number of CIA personnel in Ukraine, but sources suggest it is less than 100 at any one time.


This is an interesting set of admissions because it asserts that the CIA is operating in Ukraine because nominal US military forces being there would constitute “boots on the ground”—a far stickier situation. However, the real angle to this is that allowing CIA to operate gives the US a sort of plausible deniability to characterize the operations with an image of corporate looking guys in suit-and-ties, black sunglasses, briefcases, merely gathering intel—innocuous by comparison to full-fledged military commandos armed to the teeth.

However, in reality we know the CIA has its own clandestine combat forces. Things like the Special Activities Center (SAC), within which lies Special Operations Group (SOG)—considered to be the most secretive unit in the entire US governmental structure. SOG has its own direct combat units, from wiki:

As the action arm of the CIA's Directorate of Operations, SAC/SOG conducts direct action missions such as raids, ambushes, sabotage, targeted killings and unconventional warfare (e.g., training and leading guerrilla and military units of other countries in combat) as an irregular military force. SAC/SOG also conducts special reconnaissance that can be either military or intelligence driven and is carried out by Paramilitary Officers (also called Paramilitary Operatives or Paramilitary Operations Officers) when in "non-permissive environments". Paramilitary Operations Officers are also fully trained case officers (i.e., "spy handlers") and as such conduct clandestine human intelligence (HUMINT) operations throughout the world.

That’s all to say that bureaucratically limiting “personnel on the ground” to just “CIA” and not “boots on the ground” doesn’t mean a thing: the CIA has its own “boots” and is most certainly using them. It’s just administrative semantics.

The article goes on to describe the off-radar logistics operation which clandestinely supplies Ukraine:

Now, more than a year after the invasion, the United States sustains two massive networks, one public and the other clandestine. Ships deliver goods to ports in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and Poland, and those supplies are moved by truck, train and air to Ukraine. Clandestinely though, a fleet of commercial aircraft (the "grey fleet") crisscrosses Central and Eastern Europe, moving arms and supporting CIA operations. The CIA asked Newsweek not to identify specific bases where this network is operating, nor to name the contractor operating the planes. The senior administration official said much of the network had been successfully kept under wraps, and that it was wrong to assume that Russian intelligence knows the details of the CIA's efforts. Washington believes that If the supply route were known, Russia would attack the hubs and routes, the official said.[/i]

Another small admission at the end. Pro-UA armchair warriors on Twitter believe US is incapable of being challenged and that Russia is weak; in the meantime, the actual CIA people who work the conflict understand the realities quite differently.

Then comes another reveal of Russia’s own clandestine capabilities:

Image

It then outlines the key role Poland has taken, which obviously goes toward reinforcing the idea that Poland will be made into the “new Ukraine” in the future, after the current one is used up and discarded:

Since the end of the Cold War, Poland and the United States, through the CIA, have established particularly warm relations. Poland hosted a CIA torture "black site" in the village of Stare Kiejkuty during 2002-2003. And after the initial Russian invasion of Donbas and Crimea in 2014, CIA activity expanded to make Poland its third-largest station in Europe.

In fact, I’m fairly well taken aback that they’re even so openly making such large admissions. The CIA usually doesn’t talk about the CIA unless there’s an advantageous angle to it.

And that angle could very well be their attempt to distance themselves from an increasingly erratic and unpredictable Ukrainian ‘mad dog’, which has increasingly gone ‘off the leash’, refusing to play by those previously established rules. The article goes on to highlight this next:

One crisis was averted. But a new one was brewing. Strikes inside Russia were continuing and even increasing, contrary to the fundamental U.S. condition for supporting Ukraine. There was a mysterious spate of assassinations and acts of sabotage inside Russia, some occurring in and around Moscow. Some of the attacks, the CIA concluded, were domestic in origin, undertaken by a nascent Russian opposition. But others were the work of Ukraine—even if analysts were unsure of the extent of Zelensky's direction or involvement.

Given the above, could the CIA have been using such publications to absolve itself? This would further play into the chief theme that the CIA is very diligently trying to signal its ‘gentlemanly’ intentions to Russia so that no misunderstandings or un-planned escalations can occur.

(Much more at link and well worth it.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/und ... evelations
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:53 pm

Economic contradictions
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/07/2024

Image

In addition to death, destruction and misery for the population, war implies, in its economic and financial aspects, a substantial transfer of resources from civilian aspects to the military field, with the sacrifices that this implies in the short, but also in the medium and long term. The result of a military conflict cannot be analyzed solely by observing the changes in the composition of the front, the territory under control of the parties in conflict or the numbers of casualties, but it must be done taking into account the economic consequences that for the country in question. question has and can have its continuation. The war also implies contradictions between the data that Ukraine boasts of and the dangers of which it warns.

Last month, in the same article praising the 4.5% growth that the IMF claims Ukraine has achieved this year, the Ukrainian government warned of the real risk of delays or even non-payment of public salaries and pensions to the population in case of not obtaining the financial assistance that kyiv has demanded from its partners. This threat to citizens and also to their partners shows how unrealistic this growth figure is, entirely dependent on the war and the subsidies and credits that come from abroad, but it also shows what the priorities are. In a context of inflation, unemployment and massive impoverishment of the most vulnerable sectors of the population, the neoliberal Zelensky Government is willing to cut pensions - already negligible - in order to maintain growth and allow the military sector to be the only priority of the country.

The income and expenditure data are a clear sign that nothing can overshadow Ukraine's military needs. Spending in the first seven months of 2023 already showed 48% spent on military goods and salaries, a percentage that will increase even more in 2024 according to the budgets presented by the Ministry of Finance. Warning that the needs of the front could lead to an increase - at the cost, obviously, of cuts in other items -, the Ministry proposes a budget that implies that 60% of State spending would be allocated to war and debt service. . In terms of income, military spending will exceed the Ukrainian Government's own revenue forecasts. That is to say, Ukraine would need financial assistance to cover around 50% of the State's own expenses, which include salaries, pensions, social benefits for the displaced population, education, health and infrastructure maintenance. Hence the need to receive weapons and ammunition is only part of kyiv's demands on its partners.

In one of his recent daily appearances, President Zelensky has stated that “to endure this year is to endure the war,” thereby assuming both that the conflict will continue for twelve more months and that, this time, they will be decisive. The tone of the Ukrainian president seems to want to prepare the population for an even more compromised situation than in 2023, in which, until practically the end, Ukraine continued to periodically receive financing according to previously approved funds. That is, without a doubt, the official discourse that kyiv wants to convey to its population. Zelensky's right-hand man, Andriy Ermak, already conveyed that message to his American partners in his last visit: 2024 will be the turning point of the war. In recent days, Dmitro Kuleba has added another nuance, insisting that there is no plan B, only the original plan to militarily defeat Russia in the war persists to achieve, not only the reestablishment of territorial integrity, but favorable conditions for the day after the war: easier access to the EU and NATO and, above all, war reparations from Moscow. Aside from the questionable realism of the plan, it is evident that the leader of Ukrainian diplomacy is demanding in his words that his partners provide the country with the resources and financing necessary to achieve it.

The results obtained in 2023, with a multimillion-dollar counteroffensive that has not managed to significantly modify the front nor has it managed to undermine Russia's ability to attack Ukraine, make it clear that the effort made by Western countries has not been sufficient to achieve the objectives. . From now on, any offensive that again sought the same objective of breaking through, advancing in the south and attempting to isolate Crimea would require an even greater material and economic effort than that made by Ukraine's partners since the last months of 2022, when it began.Ukraine is already aware of the need not only for huge quantities of howitzers and artillery shells, tanks and other armored vehicles or drones, but also missiles and aviation. Kiev must also be able to continue recruiting thousands of men - and, perhaps in the long term, women - to replace the losses suffered on the front, so it must have a sufficient population in the country willing to risk his life for the political project of war until the end, and must be able to instruct, equip and arm those recruits. All of this requires, in addition to organizational capacity and availability of a sufficient population, an enormous economic effort of our own and that of others.

“The Minister of Finance stated that Ukraine received $42.5 billion for the state budget in 2023 from the United States, the International Monetary Fund, Japan, Canada and other countries and organizations, compared to $31.1 billion in 2022.” Iván Katchanovski wrote on social networks, providing the data published by the Ukrainian authorities. Subsidies account for 25% of the total, while 75% are credits or credit guarantees that Ukraine will have to repay in the future. The Canadian professor specifies that these data do not include humanitarian and military assistance to Ukraine, although, taking into account the spending pattern, it is evident that a part of this assistance is also destined for military goods and services.

Despite the total increase, a decrease in the US contribution is already perceived with respect to 2022 - in reality, to the ten months of the year in which the assistance was mobilized - from 11,980 to 10,950 million dollars, while that of the Union European Union goes from 7,961 to 19,530 million, an imbalance that could increase even more in 2024. In an election year, Joe Biden's difficulties in continuing to request funds from Congress become more complicated and the optimism of a few months ago about the possibilities of obtaining the 60,000 million dollars requested is limited. The fear that revenue from the United States will be reduced is not only based on statements by US officials, such as John Kirby, who has admitted that the level of financing for Ukraine may not be the same as in previous years, but in the reaction of other actors. Faced with the risk of blockade by countries like Hungary, the countries of the European Union unilaterally increase their contributions and Úrsula von der Leyen seeks the creation of an alternative mechanism that avoids possible vetoes from countries dissatisfied with European investment in a foreign war and in a country that is not part of the bloc.

For the moment, both Washington and Brussels agree with Zelensky and his team, whose political survival depends largely on the outcome of the war, in understanding the military as the only acceptable way to resolve the war. Hence, diplomatic, political and media support for kyiv has not been broken. However, the possibility of mobilizing even higher amounts of resources may become complicated in the medium or long term, especially if it is necessary to maintain a deindustrialized country from abroad with an economy that depends on foreign credit to pay its pensions for an unlimited time. . The latest information provided by Ukraine suggests that the training of Ukrainian pilots in the handling of F-16s will last for months. It is to be hoped that kyiv has understood the lesson of the impossibility of trying to carry out an operation like the one in Zaporozhie, which Zelensky seems to seek to repeat, without having the necessary air cover. Hence, more and more experts point to 2025 and not 2024 as the time for the offensive that will determine the outcome of the war . Until then, and possibly also afterwards, the State and the economy of Ukraine will have to be maintained from abroad through concessions and credits that the United States seems to find increasingly difficult to approve and that, in case of reduction, will have to be compensated by an increase in the economic commitment of other countries. With Washington demanding an increase in military production on the continent, it seems evident that the United States seeks to make the European Union responsible for maintaining the State of Ukraine and containing Russia while focusing on the Chinese threat .

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/07/contr ... conomicas/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for January 5-6
January 7, 2024
Rybar

Image

Over the past two days, the enemy has made several attempts to attack the Crimean Peninsula . After previous attacks on the Black Sea Fleet , the enemy command focused on weakening Russian air defense forces and targeted command posts in Crimea. Repeated attacks using decoy missiles are expected in the near future.

In turn, the Russian Armed Forces again attacked the Starokonstantinov airfield with Geraniums . Explosions were also reported in the Dnepropetrovsk , Kharkov and Nikolaev regions . This time, the targets of the strikes were the so-called energy and military infrastructure facilities. Ukraine.

In the Kremensky sector, Russian troops continued to expand their operational space in the area of ​​the Tor salient . At the same time, the main battles are being fought towards Terny and Yampolovka , where the Russian Armed Forces were able to make significant progress. To the south, certain successes have been observed in the Serebryansky forestry area .

Missile strike and tactics of Ukrainian formations

Image
The attacks of Ukrainian formations on Crimea continued for several days : on January 5, at around 12.20 - 12.30 , the Ukrainian Armed Forces launched an anti-ship missile " Neptune " from the outskirts of Odessa . But at the time of this attempt, a MiG-31 was patrolling in the air and flew out to intercept. And somewhere 80 km northwest of Cape Tarkhankut, a Ukrainian missile was shot down.

The new attack occurred on the night of January 5 to January 6. Four Storm Shadow/SCALP missiles were fired from two Su-24M bombers in the direction of Saki airfield . Aviation at the base had already been dispersed on alert, but the target was not airplanes. Ukrainian forces managed to hit the administrative building, but at the time of the alarm it was empty, which allowed them to avoid losses.

Something else is interesting about this attack: what the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ tactics became during the attacks. All yesterday, Ukrainian aviation was taking off and landing. Periodically, ADM-160 MALD decoys were launched from the MiG-29 and Su-27 . It is for this reason that aviation danger has been repeatedly declared in Crimea. Decoys are displayed as real missiles, allowing the enemy to mislead air defense systems and determine the location and time of their reaction. At the time of one of these launches, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attempted to deliver a real strike with Neptune on Cape Tarkhankut or Yevpatoria , but the missile was shot down by a MiG-31 fighter.

And by the evening, in anticipation of the launch of the Storms, five Beaver -type UAVs , which are less noticeable than the same Mugin-5 UAVs, were sent to the Crimea from Koblevo. They flew along the western coast of Crimea and went on patrol near Novofedorovka , where they were shot down. A couple of hours later, two Su-24M bombers attacked Saki, which was actively tracked by drones the night before and last night, as well as by a NATO satellite constellation (more than 10 images were taken over three days) .

But the essence of the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces is obvious: after the weakening of the fleet, the main task is to suppress air defense in Crimea, and this can be done by disrupting the combat control of air defense and aerospace forces units. That is why the emphasis is primarily on command posts, which should be kept in mind during further attacks by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

It is noteworthy that on the evening of January 6, the enemy again tried to attack Crimea using six Neptune anti-ship missiles at once . The raid was repelled, but the possibility of new attacks in the near future should not be ruled out.

About the strike of the Russian Armed Forces on the Microdevices Research Institute in Kyiv

Photos from Kiev , where local services dug out the remains of fallen ammunition from the ground during the raid on January 2, went viral on the Internet . Amid numerous disputes about whether the find was a combat part of the “Dagger” or not, the most interesting moment remained behind the scenes - the specific place of arrival.

Based on the details of the area captured in the photographs—the glazing of the building and characteristic vegetation—we were able to determine that the rocket crashed near the Microdevices Research Institute on Severo-Syretskaya Street. The company is located near the previously damaged Kvazar plant and also specializes in the production of electronics.

Taking into account new facts, as well as the results of other strikes by the Russian Armed Forces in early 2024, several conclusions can be drawn:

Russian troops actually carried out a combined attack, striking specific military-industrial complex targets in the so-called capital. Ukraine. The priority area was factories related to the production of electronics.

Hypersonic “Daggers” still remain an effective means of hitting targets in Kyiv, covered by a large number of modern air defense systems. A series of explosions on January 2 invalidates the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ claims that missiles were intercepted, and there are also no traces of kinetic impact on the ammunition that fell at the Micropribor Research Institute.

At the same time, the crater in front of the entrance to the Micropribor Research Institute is a good illustration of the fact that there is no wunderwaffe, and any missile can deviate from the target. And this again reminds us that effective strikes depend to a much greater extent on the available technical and organizational capabilities rather than on some higher matters.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
Strikes by the Russian Armed Forces continued against so-called rear targets. Ukraine. This time the targets of the strikes were the enemy’s energy and military infrastructure. In particular, strikes against front-line targets, for example the Kurakhovskaya Thermal Power Plant , were highlighted . At the same time, explosions were recorded in the Dnepropetrovsk , Kharkov , Khmelnytsky and Nikolaev regions . However, it is currently not possible to confirm the final result of these strikes.


In the Kupyansky sector, intense fighting is taking place in the Ivanovka area and on the approaches to Sinkovka , where, according to some reports, Russian troops were able to significantly improve their position. In Kupyansk itself , despite the assumptions of Western analysts about an imminent assault on the city, a relatively calm situation reigns. Ammunition warehouses are being built here, and fortification work is being carried out in the area of ​​the former airport in Sobolevka .

Image
The offensive of Russian troops continues in the Liman direction . As we noted earlier, the main goal in this section of the front is to eliminate the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ bridgehead on the right bank of the Zherebets River.

Units of the Russian Armed Forces are methodically pushing through the defenses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area of ​​​​the settlements of Terny and Yampolovka . According to footage published by the enemy, the advance of Russian troops north of the Broad Ravine is recorded . To reach the outskirts of the villages, there is still about three kilometers to go with several forest belts. Nevertheless, Ukrainian formations are resisting, launching counterattacks and striking at the advancing assault groups of the Russian Armed Forces.

If Tern and Yampolovka are liberated, the enemy’s position in the Zhuravka and Nevsky gully area will become significantly more complicated, since Ukrainian Armed Forces units will have to weaken their forward lines to strengthen defense against attacks from the southern flank. In addition, some Russian media report certain successes of Russian troops in the Serebryansky forestry area . However, this information has not yet been confirmed by means of objective control.


In the Soledar direction, the main battles took place in the Khromovo area . The Russian Armed Forces, with fire support, continued to advance in this area. Also, Russian troops were able to gain a foothold in the northern part of Bogdanovka . At the same time, on the southern flank of Bakhmut there were oncoming battles to the north-west of Kleshcheevka and in Andreevka .


In the Donetsk direction, the main battles are still taking place in the Avdeevsky sector . At the same time, the same situation remains here: the main battles are conducted on the flanks under conditions of high intensity of shelling. Over the past two days, Russian troops were able to advance and strengthen positions on the northern flank at Petrovsky and along the forest plantations towards Novobakhmutovka . There were also battles on the southwestern sector of the front in the Vodyanoye area .


In the Orekhovsky sector, the front line has not changed. There are oncoming battles near Rabotino , where Russian troops carried out assault operations and took several strongholds of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. The enemy, taking advantage of bad weather conditions such as fog and rain, using artillery, cluster munitions, and, more recently, tanks, is making attempts to attack the positions of the Russian Armed Forces near Verbovoy and north of Novoprokopovka , but without success. At the same time, Russian troops in this direction are experiencing problems with counter-battery communications and electronic warfare.


The situation in the Kherson direction has not changed. Permanent fighting continues in Krynki, and there has also been unconfirmed information about the advance of Russian troops on the islands. Crossing the left bank of the Dnieper remains a significant problem for the Ukrainian Armed Forces: some enemy units, suffering heavy losses, are trying to retreat from occupied territories. At the same time, it was reported about possible plans of the Ukrainian command to carry out a large transfer of forces to the left bank in order to maintain existing control. However, this option should not be ruled out, especially considering the enemy’s previous suicidal tendencies in this direction.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

Image
The Ukrainian Armed Forces continued daily shelling of the Belgorod region . The following were under enemy fire: Belgorod , Shebekino , Razumnoye , Mokraya Orlovka , Poroz , Karabanovo , Prilesye and Murom : residential buildings, cars, industrial enterprises, power lines and coolant pipelines were damaged. Three people were injured. In addition, one air target was shot down by the air defense system over the Belgorod region : according to local authorities, there were no casualties or damage.

Image
In addition, the enemy has been attacking with drones and indiscriminately shelling the civilian infrastructure of the Donetsk People's Republic over the past two days . Kuibyshevsky, Petrovsky, Kirovsky and Kievsky districts of Donetsk , as well as Nikitovsky and Tsentralno-Gorodsky districts of Gorlovka , Yasinovatsky district and Chervonogvardeysky district of Makeyevka were under fire : residential buildings, power lines and property were damaged. Three civilians were killed and at least 13 were injured.

Image
Settlements on the left bank of the Kherson region were under intense fire . Over the past time, the following have come under attack: Kardashinka , Golaya Pristan , Aleshki , Korsunka , Obryvka , Proletarka , Staraya Zburevka , Cossack Camps, Sagi , Zabarino , Rybalche , Cairo , Gornostaevka and Zavodovka . In Staraya Zburyevka , power lines and a residential building were damaged, at least one casualty was reported, and in neighboring Aleshki , one civilian was killed and another was injured. Enemy UAV activity was recorded over Cairo and Konstantinovka .

Political events
About military assistance for the so-called Ukraine

The Danish Ministry of Defense reported that the transfer of six F-16s to Ukraine was delayed by about six months . The reason is the absence of “certain conditions for combat use.” According to the defense department, it is necessary to train personnel, arrange supplies for the fighter and prepare airfields. At the same time, the first six Ukrainian pilots may be ready for combat flights before spring, and the delivery itself was originally planned for 2024.

In addition, problems arise with the MIM-104 Patriot : due to the lack of a congressionally approved aid budget for the so-called. Ukraine, the supply of missiles for air defense systems will not be able to continue for a long time. As The New York Times notes , the Patriots are designed to counter Russian ballistic missiles, and the effectiveness of Ukrainian air defense depended on their presence.

However, such publications should not be taken as the pure truth: their goal is to explain to the population and politicians why new military aid packages need to be allocated to Kyiv. This is not the first time that the Western press has reported problems with arms supplies, and despite this, neither the United States nor the European Union yet intend to stop funding the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In addition, the same F-16s are already in the so-called territory. Ukraine .

It is interesting that against this background, the German government published data on the first military aid package for Ukraine this year. It included:

– ammunition for Leopard 2A6 tanks;

– ten Marder infantry fighting vehicles;

– missiles for the Iris-T air defense system;

– anti-aircraft artillery complex Oerlikon Skynex (pictured). It should be noted that this complex produced by Rheinmetall was sent to Ukraine for the first time.

– two multifunctional radars TRML-4D;

– 9 thousand artillery shells of 155 mm caliber;

– two “Wisent 1 MC” mine clearing vehicles

– tank bridge layer “BIBER”;

– 47 trucks of various models;

– 6.7 million rounds of small arms ammunition;

– 1.1 thousand winter camouflage nets.

In addition, four Iris-T SLM air defense systems and one Oerlikon Skynex anti-aircraft artillery system are being prepared for shipment to Ukraine in Berlin.

Expansion of mobilization as the overall result of the military campaign of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in 2023

On the so-called Ukraine continues mobilization measures reaching the point of absurdity: in the Transcarpathian region , representatives of the territorial recruitment center at a checkpoint took a man from his car and harshly forced him to appear at the TCC. His wife and child remained in the car at the time. They promised to release the man after a summons was issued, but he is still being held.

Another interesting case occurred in Odessa : there, a potential conscript managed to barricade himself in a car to avoid receiving a summons, and military registration and enlistment office employees had to surround the facility in order to prevent him from leaving. Meanwhile, on the border with Moldova, Ukrainian border guards detained a group of ten men on the banks of the Dniester River who were trying to avoid mobilization by crossing into a neighboring state.

At the same time, attempts continue to forcefully send Ukrainians who fled the country to the front: People’s Deputy Yegor Chernev said that changes in mobilization will apply to citizens of military age abroad, for whom, according to him, “there are still more questions.” Meanwhile, questions arise in the area of ​​how to provide for the mobilized. So, at a meeting of the National Security Committee, data on the so-called budget deficit of the Ministry of Defense was announced. Ukraine.

The format of mobilization events has taken such sharp turns that the online dictionary of modern Ukrainian language and slang “ Myslovo ” has chosen the term mobilization as the word of 2023, and individual politicians are already promoting themselves by criticizing excesses on the ground. For example, a deputy from the pro-presidential Servant of the People party, Gheorghe Mazurashu, asks the question: will someone kidnapped on the street be mobilized to defend his country ?

(More at link)

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

Image
“Defend Sevastopol.” Vassily Nesterenko (2005).

The Russian Art of War: How the West led Ukraine to defeat
Originally published: The Postil Magazine on January 1, 2024 by Jacques Baud (more by The Postil Magazine) (Posted Jan 05, 2024)

We are very happy to bring you this excerpt from Colonel Jacques Baud’s latest book, The Russian Art of War: How the West Led Ukraine to Defeat (L’art de la guerre russe: Comment l’occident conduire l’ukraine a la echec). This is a detailed study of the two-year old conflict in which the West has brutally used the Ukrainians to pursue an old pipedream: the conquest of Russia.

The book is being translated into English, and we will update this page when it is published. In the meantime, we provide a generous excerpt, along with a detailed Table of Contents, to give you a taste of this very important and much-needed book.

Russian Military Thought
Throughout the Cold War period, the Soviet Union saw itself as the spearhead of a historical struggle that would lead to a confrontation between the “capitalist” system and “progressive forces.” This perception of a permanent and inescapable war led the Soviets to study war in a quasi-scientific way, and to structure this thinking into an architecture of military thought that has no equal in the Western world.

The problem with the vast majority of our so-called military experts is their inability to understand the Russian approach to war. It is the result of an approach we have already seen in waves of terrorist attacks—the adversary is so stupidly demonized that we refrain from understanding his way of thinking. As a result, we are unable to develop strategies, articulate our forces, or even equip them for the realities of war. The corollary of this approach is that our frustrations are translated by unscrupulous media into a narrative that feeds hatred and increases our vulnerability. We are thus unable to find rational, effective solutions to the problem.

The way Russians understand conflict is holistic. In other words, they see the processes that develop and lead to the situation at any given moment. This explains why Vladimir Putin’s speeches invariably include a return to history. In the West, we tend to focus on X moment and try to see how it might evolve. We want an immediate response to the situation we see today. The idea that “from the understanding of how the crisis arose comes the way to resolve it” is totally foreign to the West. In September 2023, an English-speaking journalist even pulled out the “duck test” for me: “if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, it’s probably a duck.” In other words, all the West needs to assess a situation is an image that fits their prejudices. Reality is much more subtle than the duck model….

The reason the Russians are better than the West in Ukraine is that they see the conflict as a process; whereas we see it as a series of separate actions. The Russians see events as a film. We see them as photographs. They see the forest, while we focus on the trees. That is why we place the start of the conflict on February 24, 2022, or the start of the Palestinian conflict on October 7, 2023. We ignore the contexts that bother us and wage conflicts we do not understand. That is why we lose our wars…

In Russia, unsurprisingly, the principles of the military art of the Soviet forces inspired those currently in use:

readiness to carry out assigned missions;
concentration of efforts on solving a specific mission;
surprise (unconventionality) of military action vis-à-vis the enemy;
finality determines a set of tasks and the level of resolution of each one;
totality of available means determines the way to resolve the mission and achieve the objective (correlation of forces);
coherence of leadership (unity of command);
economy of forces, resources, time and space;
support and restoration of combat capability;
freedom of maneuver.
It should be noted that these principles apply not only to the implementation of military action as such. They are also applicable as a system of thought to other non-operational activities.

An honest analysis of the conflict in Ukraine would have identified these various principles and drawn useful conclusions for Ukraine. But none of the self-proclaimed experts on TV were intellectually able to do so.

Thus, Westerners are systematically surprised by the Russians in the fields of technology (e.g., hypersonic weapons), doctrine (e.g., operative art) and economics (e.g., resilience to sanctions). In a way, the Russians are taking advantage of our prejudices to exploit the principle of surprise. We can see this in the Ukrainian conflict, where the Western narrative led Ukraine to totally underestimate Russian capabilities, which was a major factor in its defeat. That is why Russia did not really try to counter this narrative and let it play out—the belief that we are superior makes us vulnerable….

Correlation of Forces
Russian military thought is traditionally linked to a holistic approach to warfare, which involves the integration of a large number of factors in the development of a strategy. This approach is materialized by the concept of “correlation of forces” (Соотношение сил).

Often translated as “balance of forces” or “ratio of forces,” this concept is only understood by Westerners as a quantitative quantity, limited to the military domain. In Soviet thinking, however, the correlation of forces reflected a more holistic reading of war:

There are several criteria for assessing the correlation of strengths. In the economic sphere, the factors usually compared are gross national product per capita, labor productivity, the dynamics of economic growth, the level of industrial production, particularly in high-tech sectors, the technical infrastructure of the production tool, the resources and degree of qualification of the workforce, the number of specialists and the level of development of theoretical and applied sciences.

In the military field, the factors compared are the quantity and quality of armaments, the firepower of the armed forces, the fighting and moral qualities of the soldiers, the level of staff training, the organization of the troops and their combat experience, the character of the military doctrine and the methods of strategic, operative and tactical thinking.

In the political sphere, the factors that come into consideration are the breadth of the social base of state authority, its organization, the constitutional procedure for relations between the government and legislative bodies, the ability to take operational decisions, and the degree and character of popular support for domestic and foreign policy.

Finally, when assessing the strength of the international movement, the factors taken into consideration are its quantitative composition, its influence with the masses, its position in the political life of each country, the principles and norms of relations between its components and the degree of their cohesion.

In other words, the assessment of the situation is not limited to the balance of forces on the battlefield, but takes into account all the elements that have an impact on the evolution of the conflict. Thus, for their Special Military Operation, the Russian authorities had planned to support the war effort through the economy, without moving to a “war economy” regimen. Thus, unlike in Ukraine, there was no interruption in the tax and welfare mechanisms.

This is why the sanctions applied to Russia in 2014 had a double positive effect. The first was the realization that they were not only a short-term problem, but above all a medium- and long-term opportunity. They encouraged Russia to produce goods it had previously preferred to buy abroad. The second was the signal that the West would increasingly use economic weapons as a means of pressure in the future. It therefore became imperative, for reasons of national independence and sovereignty, to prepare for more far-reaching sanctions affecting the country’s economy.

In reality, it has long been known that sanctions do not work. Logically enough, they have had the opposite effect, acting as protectionist measures for Russia, which has thus been able to consolidate its economy, as had been the case after the 2014 sanctions. A sanctions strategy might have paid off if the Russian economy had effectively been the equivalent of the Italian or Spanish economy, i.e., with a high level of debt; and if the entire planet had acted in unison to isolate Russia.

The inclusion of the correlation of forces in the decision-making process is a fundamental difference from Western decision-making processes, which are linked more to a policy of communication than to a rational approach to problems.

This explains, for example, Russia’s limited objectives in the Ukraine, where it does not seek to occupy the entire territory, as the correlation of forces in the western part of the country would be unfavorable.

At every level of leadership, the correlation of forces is part of situation assessment. At the operational level, it is defined as follows:

The result of comparing the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the forces and resources (sub-units, units, weapons, military equipment, etc.) of one’s own troops (forces) and those of the enemy. It is calculated on an operational and tactical scale throughout the area of operations, in the main and other directions, in order to determine the degree of objective superiority of one of the opposing camps. Force correlation assessment is used to make an informed decision about an operation (battle), and to establish and maintain the necessary superiority over the enemy for as long as possible, when decisions are redefined (modified) during military (combat) operations.

This simple definition is the reason why the Russians committed themselves with forces inferior to those of Ukraine in February 2022, or why they withdrew from Kiev, Kharkov and Kherson in March, September and October 2022.

Structure of the Doctrine
The Russians have always attached particular importance to doctrine. Better than the West, they have understood that “a common way of seeing, thinking and acting”—as Marshal Foch put it—gives coherence, while allowing for infinite variations in the conception of operations. Military doctrine is a kind of “common core” that serves as a reference for designing operations.

Russian military doctrine divides military art into three main components: strategy (strategiya), operative art (operativnoe iskoustvo) and tactics (taktika). Each of these components has its own characteristics, very similar to those found in Western doctrines. Using the terminology of French doctrine on the use of forces:

The strategic level is that of conception. The aim of strategic action is to lead the adversary to negotiation or defeat.
The operative level is that of cooperation and coordination of inter-force actions, with a view to achieving a given military objective.
The tactical level, finally, is that of maneuver execution at weapon level as an integral part of the operational maneuver.
These three components correspond to levels of leadership, which translate into leadership structures and the space in which military operations are conducted. For simplicity’s sake, let us say that the strategic level ensures the management of the theater of war (Театр Войны) (TV); a geographically vast entity, with its own command and control structures, within which there are one or more strategic directions. The theater of war comprises a set of theaters of military operations (Театр Военных Действий) (TVD), which represent a strategic direction and are the domain of operative action. These various theaters have no predetermined structure and are defined according to the situation. For example, although we commonly speak of the “war in Afghanistan” (1979-1989) or the “war in Syria” (2015-), these countries are considered in Russian terminology as TVDs and not TVs.

The same applies to Ukraine, which Russia sees as a theater of military operations (TVD) and not a theater of war (TV), which explains why the action in Ukraine is designated as a “Special Military Operation” (Специальная Военая Операция—Spetsialaya). A Special Military Operation” (Специальная Военная Операция—Spetsial’naya Voyennaya Operatsiya—SVO, or SMO in English abbreviation) and not a “war.”

The use of the word “war” would imply a different structure of conduct than that envisaged by the Russians in Ukraine, and would have other structural implications in Russia itself. Moreover—and this is a central point—as NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg himself acknowledges, “the war began in 2014” and should have been ended by the Minsk Agreements. The SMO is therefore a “military operation” and not a new “war,” as many Western “experts” claim.

The Special Military Operation in Ukraine
The Correlation of Forces
Consider all the factors that directly or indirectly influence the conflict. Conversely, as we have seen in Ukraine and elsewhere, Westerners have a much more political reading of the war, and end up mixing the two. This is why communication plays such an essential role in the conduct of war: the perception of the conflict plays an almost more important role than its reality. This is why, in Iraq, the Americans literally invented episodes that glorified their troops.

Russia’s analysis of the situation in February 2022 was undoubtedly considerably more pertinent than that of the West. They knew that a Ukrainian offensive against the Donbass was underway and that it could endanger the government. In 2014-2015, after the massacres in Odessa and Mariupol, the Russian population was very much in favor of intervention. Vladimir Putin’s stubborn clinging to the Minsk Agreements was poorly understood in Russia.

The factors that contributed to Russia’s decision to intervene were twofold: the expected support of Ukraine’s ethnically Russian population (which we will call “Russian-speaking” for convenience) and an economy robust enough to withstand sanctions.

The Russian-speaking population had risen up en masse against the new authorities following the coup d’état of February 2014, whose first decision had been to strip the Russian language of its official status. Kiev tried to backtrack, but in April 2019, the 2014 decision was definitively confirmed.

Since the adoption of the Law on Indigenous Peoples on July 1, 2021, Russian speakers (ethnic Russians) are no longer considered normal Ukrainian citizens and no longer enjoy the same rights as ethnic Ukrainians. They can therefore be expected to offer no resistance to the Russian coalition in the eastern part of the country….

Since March 24, 2021, Ukrainian forces have been stepping up their presence around the Donbass and have increased the pressure against the autonomists with their fire.

Zelensky’s decree of March 24, 2021 for the reconquest of Crimea and the Donbass was the real trigger for the SMO. From that moment on, the Russians understood that if there was military action against them, they would have to intervene. But they also knew that the cause of the Ukrainian operation was NATO membership, as Oleksei Arestovitch had explained. That is why, in mid-December 2021, they were submitting proposals to the USA and NATO on extending the Alliance: their aim was then to remove Ukraine’s motive for an offensive in the Donbass.

The reason for the Russian Special Military Operation (SMO) is indeed the protection of the populations of Donbass; but this protection was necessary because of Kiev’s desire to go through a confrontation to enter NATO. The extension of NATO is therefore only the indirect cause of the conflict in Ukraine. The latter could have spared itself this ordeal by implementing the Minsk Agreements—but what we wanted was a defeat for Russia.

In 2008, Russia intervened in Georgia to protect the Russian minority then being bombed by its government, as confirmed by the Swiss ambassador, Heidi Tagliavini, who was responsible for investigating this event. In 2014, many voices were raised in Russia to demand intervention when the new regime in Kiev had engaged its army against the civilian population of the five autonomist oblasts (Odessa, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov, Lugansk and Donetsk) and applied a fierce repression. In 2022, it could be expected that the population of Russia would not understand the government’s inaction, after no efforts were made from the Ukrainian and Western sides to enforce the Minsk Agreements. They knew that they did not have the means to launch an economic retaliation. But they also knew that an economic war against Russia would inevitably backfire on Western countries.

An important element of Russian military and political thinking is its legalistic dimension. The way our media present events, systematically omitting facts that could explain, justify, legitimize or even legalize Russia’s actions. We tend to think that Russia is acting outside any legal framework. For example, our media present the Russian intervention in Syria as having been decided unilaterally by Moscow; whereas it was carried out at the request of the Syrian government, after the West had allowed the Islamic State to move closer to Damascus, as confessed by John Kerry, then Secretary of State. Nevertheless, there is never any mention of the occupation of eastern Syria by American troops, who were never even invited there!

We could multiply the examples, to which our journalists will counter with the war crimes committed by Russian forces. This may well be true, but the simple fact that these accusations are not based on any impartial and neutral investigation (as required by humanitarian doctrine), nor on any international one, since Russia is systematically refused participation, casts a shadow over the honesty of these accusations. For example, the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines was immediately attributed to Russia, which was accused of violating international law.

In fact, unlike the West, which advocates a “rules-based international order,” the Russians insist on a “law-based international order.” Unlike the West, they will apply the law to the letter. No more, no less.

The legal framework for Russia’s intervention in Ukraine has been meticulously planned. As this subject has already been covered in one of my previous books, I will not go into details here…

The Objectives and Strategy of Russia
On February 23, 2023, Swiss military “expert” Alexandre Vautravers commented on Russia’s objectives in Ukraine:

The aim of the Special Military Operation was to decapitate Ukrainian political and military governance in the space of five, ten, maybe even two weeks. The Russians then changed their plan and their objectives with a number of other failures; so they change their objectives and their strategic orientations almost every week or every month.

The problem is that our “experts” themselves define Russia’s objectives according to what they imagine, only to be able to say that it has not achieved them. So. Let us get back to the facts.

On February 24, 2022, Russia launched its “Special Military Operation” (SMO) in Ukraine “at short notice.” In his televised address, Vladimir Putin explained that its strategic objective was to protect the population of Donbass. This objective can be broken down into two parts:

“demilitarize” the Ukrainian armed forces regrouped in the Donbass in preparation for the offensive against the DPR and LPR; and
“denazify” (i.e. “neutralize”) the ultra-nationalist and neo-Nazi paramilitary militias in the Mariupol area.
The formulation chosen by Vladimir Putin has been very poorly analyzed in the West. It is inspired by the 1945 Potsdam Declaration, which envisaged the development of defeated Germany according to four principles: demilitarization, denazification, democratization and decentralization.

The Russians understand war from a Clausewitzian perspective: war is the pursuit of politics by other means. This then means that they seek to transform operational successes into strategic successes, and military successes into political objectives. So, while the demilitarization evoked by Putin is clearly linked to the military threat to the populations of the Donbass in application of the decree of March 24, 2021, signed by Zelensky.

But this objective conceals a second: the neutralization of Ukraine as a future NATO member. This is what Zelensky understood when he proposed a resolution to the conflict in March 2022. At first, his proposal was supported by Western countries, probably because at this stage they believed that Russia had failed in its bid to take over Ukraine in three days, and that it would not be able to sustain its war effort because of the massive sanctions imposed on it. But at the NATO meeting of March 24, 2022, the Allies decided not to support Zelensky’s proposition.

Nevertheless, on March 27, Zelensky publicly defended his proposal and on March 28, as a gesture of support for this effort, Vladimir Putin eased the pressure on the capital and withdrew his troops from the area. Zelensky’s proposal served as the basis for the Istanbul Communiqué of March 29, 2022, a ceasefire agreement as a prelude to a peace agreement. It was this document that Vladimir Putin presented in June 2023, when an African delegation visited Moscow. It was Boris Johnson’s intervention that prompted Zelensky to withdraw his proposal, exchanging peace and the lives of his men for support “for as long as it takes.”

This version of events—which I have already presented in my previous works—was finally confirmed in early November 2023 by David Arakhamia, then chief negotiator for Ukraine196. He explained that Russia had never intended to seize Kiev.

In essence, Russia agreed to withdraw to the borders of February 23, 2022, in exchange for a ceiling on Ukrainian forces and a commitment not to become a NATO member, along with security guarantees from a number of countries….

Two conclusions can be drawn:

Russia’s objective was not to conquer territory. If the West had not intervened to push Zelensky to withdraw his offer, Ukraine would probably still have its army.
While the Russians intervened to ensure the security and protection of the population of the Donbass, their SMO enabled them to achieve a broader objective, which involves Russia’s security.
This means that, although this objective is not formulated, the demilitarization of Ukraine could open the door to its neutralization. This is not surprising since, conversely, in an interview with the Ukrainian channel Apostrof’ on March 18, 2019, Volodymyr Zelensky’s advisor Oleksei Arestovitch cynically explains that, because Ukraine wants to join NATO, it will have to create the conditions for Russia to attack Ukraine and be definitively defeated.

The problem is that Ukrainian and Western analysis is fueled by their own narratives. The conviction that Russia will lose has meant that no alternative contingency has been prepared. In September 2023, the West, beginning to see the collapse of this narrative and its implementation, tried to move towards a “freeze” in the conflict, without taking into account the opinion of the Russians, who dominate on the ground.

Yet Russia would have been satisfied with a situation such as that proposed by Zelensky in March 2022. What the West wants in September 2023 is merely a pause until an even more violent conflict breaks out, after Ukrainian forces have been rearmed and reconstituted.

Ukrainian Strategy
The strategic objective of Volodymyr Zelensky and his team is to join NATO, as a prelude to a brighter future within the EU. It complements that of the Americans (and therefore of the Europeans). The problem is that tensions with Russia, particularly over Crimea, are causing NATO members to put off Ukraine’s participation. In March 2022, Zelensky revealed on CNN that this is exactly what the Americans told him.

Before coming to power in April 2019, Volodymyr Zelensky’s discourse was divided between two antagonistic policies: the reconciliation with Russia promised during his presidential campaign and his goal of joining NATO. He knows that these two policies are mutually exclusive, as Russia does not want to see NATO and its nuclear weapons installed in Ukraine and wanted neutrality or non-alignment.

What is more, he knows that his ultra-nationalist allies will refuse to negotiate with Russia. This was confirmed by Praviy Sektor leader Dmitro Yarosh, who openly threatened him with death in the Ukrainian media a month after his election. Zelensky therefore knew from the start of the election campaign that he would not be able to fulfill his promise of reconciliation, and that there was only one solution left: confrontation with Russia.

But this confrontation could not be waged by Ukraine alone against Russia, and it would need the material support of the West. The strategy devised by Zelensky and his team was revealed before his election in March 2019 by Oleksei Arestovitch, his personal advisor, on the Ukrainian media Apostrof’. Arestovitch explained that it would take an attack by Russia to provoke an international mobilization that would enable Ukraine to defeat Russia once and for all, with the help of Western countries and NATO. With astonishing precision, he described the course of the Russian attack as it would unfold three years later, between February and March 2022. Not only did he explain that this conflict was unavoidable if Ukraine is to join NATO, but he also placed this confrontation in 2021-2022! He outlined the main areas of Western aid:

In this conflict, we will be very actively supported by the West. Weapons. Equipment. Assistance. New sanctions against Russia. Most likely, the introduction of a NATO contingent. A no-fly zone, and so on. In other words, we won’t lose it.

As we can see, this strategy has much in common with the one described by the RAND Corporation at the same time. So much so, in fact, that it is hard not to see it as a strategy strongly inspired by the United States. In his interview, Arestovitch singled out four elements that would become the pillars of the Ukrainian strategy against Russia, and to which Zelensky returned regularly:

International aid and arms supplies,
International sanctions,
NATO intervention,
Creation of a no-fly zone.
It should be noted that these four pillars are understood by Zelensky as promises whose fulfillment is essential to the success of this strategy. In February 2023, Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary of Ukraine’s Defense and National Security Council, declared in The Kyiv Independent that Ukraine’s objective was the disintegration of Russia. The mobilization of Western countries to supply Ukraine with heavy weapons then seems to give substance to this objective, which is consistent with what Oleksiy Arestovich had declared in March 2019.

A few months later, however, it became clear that the equipment supplied to Ukraine was not sufficient to ensure the success of its counter-offensive, and Zelensky asked for additional, better-adapted equipment. At this point, there was a certain amount of Western irritation at these repeated demands. Former British Defense Minister Ben Wallace declared that Westerners “are not Amazon.” In fact, the West does not respect its commitments.

Contrary to what our media and pseudo-military experts tell us, since February 2022, it has been clear that Ukraine cannot defeat Russia on its own. As Obama put it, “Russia [there] will always be able to maintain its escalation dominance.” In other words, Ukraine will only be able to achieve its goals with the involvement of NATO countries. This means that its fate will depend on the goodwill of Western countries. So, we need to maintain a narrative that encourages the West to keep up this effort. This narrative will then become what we call, in strategic terms, its “center of gravity.”

As the months went by, the course of operations showed that the prospect of a Ukrainian victory was becoming increasingly remote, as Russia, far from being weakened, was growing stronger, militarily and economically. Even General Christopher Cavoli, Supreme American Commander Europe (SACEUR), told a U.S. congressional committee that “Russia’s air, naval, space, digital and strategic capabilities have not suffered significant degradation during this war.”

The West, expecting a short conflict, is no longer able to maintain the effort promised to Ukraine. The NATO summit in Vilnius (July 11-12, 2023) ended in partial success for Ukraine. Its membership is postponed indefinitely. Its situation is even worse than it was at the beginning of 2022, since there is no more justification for its entry into NATO than there was before the SMO.

Ukraine then turned its attention to a more concrete objective: regaining sovereignty over its entire 1991 territory.

Thus, the Ukrainian notion of “victory” rapidly evolved. The idea of a “collapse of Russia” quickly faded, as did that of its dismemberment. There was talk of “regime change,” which Zelensky made his objective by forbidding any negotiations as long as Vladimir Putin was in power. Then came the reconquest of lost territories, thanks to the counter-offensive of 2023. But here, too, hopes quickly faded. The plan was simply to cut the Russian forces in two, with a thrust towards the Sea of Azov. But by September 2023, this objective had been reduced to the liberation of three cities.

In the absence of concrete successes, narrative remains the only element Ukraine can rely on to maintain Western attention and willingness to support it. For, as Ben Wallace, ex-Defence Minister, put it in The Telegraph on October 1, 2023: “The most precious commodity is hope.” True enough. But Western appraisal of the situation must be based on realistic analyses of the adversary. However, since the beginning of the Ukrainian crisis, Western analyses have been based on prejudice.

The Notion of Victory
Russia operates within a framework of Clausewitzian thinking, in which operational successes are exploited for strategic ends. Operational strategy (“operative art”) therefore plays an essential role in the definition of what is considered a victory.

As we saw during the battle of Bakhmut, the Russians adapted perfectly to the strategy imposed on Ukraine by the West, which prioritizes the defense of every square meter. The Ukrainians thus played into the hands of the attrition strategy officially announced by Russia. Conversely, in Kharkov and Kherson, the Russians preferred to cede territory in exchange for the lives of their men. In the context of a war of attrition, sacrificing potential in exchange for territory, as Ukraine is doing, is the worst strategy of all.

This is why General Zaluzhny, commander of the Ukrainian forces, tried to oppose Zelensky and proposed withdrawing his forces from Bakhmut. But in Ukraine, it is the Western narrative that guides military decisions. Zelensky preferred to follow the path laid out for him by our media, in order to retain the support of Western opinion. In November 2023, General Zaluzhny had to openly admit that this decision was a mistake, because prolonging the war will only favor Russia.

The Ukrainian conflict was inherently asymmetrical. The West wanted to turn it into a symmetrical conflict, proclaiming that Ukraine’s capabilities could be enough to topple Russia. But this was clearly wishful thinking from the outset, and its sole purpose was to justify non-compliance with the Minsk Agreements. Russian strategists have turned it into an asymmetrical conflict.

Ukraine’s problem in this conflict is that it has no rational relationship with the notion of victory. By comparison, the Palestinians, who are aware of their quantitative inferiority, have switched to a way of thinking that gives the simple act of resisting a sense of victory. This is the asymmetrical nature of the conflict that Israel has never managed to understand in 75 years, and which it is reduced to overcoming through tactical superiority rather than strategic finesse. In Ukraine, it is the same phenomenon. By clinging to a notion of victory linked to the recovery of territory, Ukraine has locked itself into a logic that can only lead to defeat.

On November 20, 2023, Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council, painted a gloomy picture of Ukrainian prospects for 2024. His speech showed that Ukraine had neither a plan to emerge from the conflict, nor an approach that would associate a sense of victory with that emergence: he was reduced to linking Ukraine’s victory to that of the West. In the West, however, the end of the conflict in Ukraine is increasingly perceived as a military, political, human and economic debacle.

In an asymmetrical situation, each protagonist is free to define his or her own criteria for victory, and to choose from a range of criteria under his or her control. This is why Egypt (1973), Hezbollah (2006), the Islamic State (2017), the Palestinian resistance since 1948 and Hamas in 2023 are victorious, despite massive losses. This seems counter-intuitive to a Western mind, but it is what explains why Westerners are unable to really “win” their wars.

In Ukraine, the political leadership has locked itself into a narrative that precludes a way out of the crisis without losing face. The asymmetrical situation now working to Ukraine’s disadvantage stems from a narrative that has been confused with reality, and has led to a response that is ill-suited to the nature of the Russian operation.

https://mronline.org/2024/01/05/the-rus ... to-defeat/
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Mon Jan 08, 2024 12:47 pm

Weapons of economic war
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/08/2024

Image

In March 2022, the first sanctions packages against the Russian Federation following the invasion of Ukraine included the freezing of Russian public and private assets in Western countries. The precedent of the confiscation of Venezuela's gold reserves during the international attempt to overthrow the Government of Nicolás Maduro made it foreseeable that similar measures would be applied. Even so, these sanctions, described as theft and piracy, came as a surprise to Russia. Since then, the question of how to use these assets has been recurring among kyiv's allies, which has always demanded that they be handed over as part of compensation for the Russian attack. For the Zelensky Government, there has never been a contradiction between its ultraliberal position – libertarian in the American sense of the term, according to which there should be no intervention by the State in the economy – and the demand that its allied countries intervene to deliver the confiscated assets.

The question of how to monetize and use against Russia these assets and the benefits they have obtained in these almost two years has acquired more presence since the moment in which political difficulties have resulted in the delay or blocking of the approval of new funding. economic and financial assistance to Ukraine, increasingly dependent on foreign income to maintain its State, army and economy. Last week, the Financial Times published an article stating that “confiscating assets from foreign countries in response to an unjust war has been a normal practice throughout history,” so it proposed a model for countries to Westerners would seize those resources for their own benefit and that of Ukraine. “Russia's flagrant violations of international law demand a response and investors should take comfort in knowing that the rules are applied,” he added.

The article coincides with a new push by the G7 countries, especially the two most interested in continuing the war, the United States and the United Kingdom, to find a way to definitively obtain these resources without creating a precedent that could become against in the future. “US and UK officials have been working in recent months to reinvigorate efforts to seize Russian assets tied up in Belgium and other European cities and hope Group of Seven leaders will agree to a tougher statement on this issue.” when it meets at the end of February.”

Reacting to the G7 plan and especially to the Financial Times article , Gerard Araud, former French ambassador to Israel, the United States and the United Nations and with extensive experience in Western think-tanks related to international relations, described the historical argument as “misleading.” ” and added something that should be obvious to all parties participating in the discussions: “the confiscation of foreign assets arose from a declared war or a peace agreement. As far as I know, we are not at war with Russia and no treaty has been signed.”

This reasoning is one of the three arguments provided by Nicholas Mulder, author of a book that discusses the rise of economic sanctions as a weapon of modern war, in an opinion article also published by the Financial Times and in which he refutes the legality and the relevance of trying to confiscate frozen assets. Mulder recalls that “by March 2022, the United States and the European Union had frozen around 300 billion of Russian central bank reserves” in retaliation for the war and explains that now “the United States supports confiscation as a “countermeasure” for the states "affected" and "especially affected" by the Russian war. The measure, Mulder adds, “invokes the legal doctrine of retaliation: when one State inflicts harm on another, for example by violating its territory, the affected party can take proportionate countermeasures against the offender. Reprisals must encourage respect for the law.” According to Mulder, who writes from a position in favor of continuing to support Ukraine economically against Russia, the retaliation argument suffers from three main problems: “it would not provide an incentive, it is being invoked by the wrong actors and it undermines the international order based on rules that Western governments claim to defend.”

No particularly sophisticated or technical arguments are needed to understand the reason for this triple reasoning. As Mulder recalls, the Russian economy has resisted for almost two years without access to these funds and Russia has been able to continue its war effort. What's more, the increase in the price of raw materials that occurred in 2022 and the recomposition of part of the economy with what Volodymyr Ischenko presents as an example of military Keynesianism have caused a surplus of 227 billion dollars in Russian coffers. , with which Moscow has recovered a significant part of those losses caused by the immobilization of its reserves abroad. The definitive loss of these funds would anger Russia even more, but it would neither provide an incentive to renounce the war nor make it impossible for Moscow to continue financing the state and the army.

As Araud stated, who agrees with Mulder's second argument, it is not Western countries that could invoke the right to confiscate these funds by claiming to feel especially affected. Mulder recalls that Ukraine already exercised that right by confiscating Russian assets in Ukraine. To make a similar seizure, the United States or European Union countries, which are not at war with Russia, “would have to become, more directly, part of the Russo-Ukrainian war.” It is therefore not surprising that kyiv, which has been demanding greater involvement, if possible direct, from its European and Western allies, is seeking this option for almost two years.

As Mulder points out and is easily understandable, the United States, and even its European allies, would have to bend the letter and spirit of the rules as much as possible to proclaim themselves especially affected by the war. In the case, for example, of Germany, which has suffered the most direct damage due to the war with the attack on the Nord Stream gas pipelines, it would be necessary to ask what assets it should confiscate taking into account that its own security services and The media points to Ukraine and not Russia as the culprit. In any case, as Mulder recalls, the moments in which the economic weapon has been used in the context of war have been those in which the parties had declared war - such as in the First World War or during the Russian civil war - or They had UN authorization to intervene, as happened after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990. “These examples suggest that Ukraine's allies cannot have it both ways, claiming war powers while insisting that they are not at war with Russia,” Mulder concludes.

Beyond the economic and legal arguments, the confiscation of $300 billion in foreign reserves of a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council would set a serious precedent that could turn against countries that carry out such acts. The power of the Western financial system is based on the political power of those countries and the reliability of their institutions. The irregular confiscation of Russian assets would create uncertainty for international actors, who could look for non-Western alternatives to keep their reserves safe. The precedent of claiming war powers without even being a direct part of it to confiscate other people's assets could open a new economic front in political confrontations such as, for example, the one the United States maintains with China. Mulder uses as a simile the case of the Iraq war and the increase in the price of oil, a moment in which China could have declared itself especially affected by the effects of a war of aggression and acted economically against the United States. But he can go even further. Wasn't China directly affected by the US bombing of its embassy in Belgrade?

The slowness with which Western countries are acting in this regard confirms that the delivery of these assets to Ukraine is not strictly necessary and its allies are being able to finance the Ukrainian military effort with their own resources. But the fact that practically two years after the start of the Russian military intervention the decision has not yet been made also shows that Western countries are trying to do it in such a way that a precedent is not created that could turn against them in the future. . The clearest case is, without a doubt, that of China, a rising economy that aspires to have a series of its own institutions that, although they do not necessarily try to compete or supplant Western ones, do try to guarantee their own security.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/08/28910/

Google TRanslator

*******

Military-Strategic Resumé of 2023: Prospects?
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ JAN 6, 2024
Original article: Dmitry Stefanovich / Translated by @GBabeuf

Researcher at the Center for International Security at the National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations named after E.M. Primakov

Image

The year has been difficult – it’s a corny line, but it’s true. Let’s start with the main thing: the “new (non)normal” has finally taken shape, and they are trying to adapt to it with varying degrees of success. Although, of course, in some areas, some actors retain the desire to live as their grandparents lived. But alas, no, if you just ignore current events and changes, that won’t make them go away.

On the military-political track, there is a continuation of the collapse of the framework of traditional arms control (suspension of the 2010 START Treaty, de-ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, final withdrawal from the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe). However, relative restraint is demonstrated both in terms of political signals and the preservation of individual elements (for example, notifications of ICBM launches), and in the military-technical field: the activity of testing new strategic weapons systems is routine in nature (and for some “new products”, for example, the promising heavy ICBM “Sarmat” is completely too leisurely). Even the traditional autumn exercises of the Russian strategic deterrence forces looked deliberately modest and were conducted with an emphatically retaliatory scenario.

All this is happening against the background of a very open increase in the nuclear missile potential of the PRC (and the DPRK) and corresponding discussions in the United States. The published report of the bipartisan Congressional Strategic Posture Commission was perhaps the most overtly formulated set of proposals for maintaining American dominance. The quality of development of these proposals remains very modest, but the trend toward, if not stimulation of, then certainly participation in the arms race, including nuclear ones, is taking shape. Another thing is that the document completely ignores possible retaliatory steps from China and Russia, but, fortunately, this is not yet our headache.

A special place is occupied by the increasingly formalised calls of American colleagues for so-called “compartmentalisation,” that is, separating the issue of arms control and “nuclear risks” from the generally “lunar” landscape of Russian-American relations. The official Russian position on the impossibility of such an approach in the current conditions has been voiced more than once, but I would like to emphasize that even in Jake Sullivan’s keynote speech, the readiness to resuscitate this track was combined with statements about the need to maintain US superiority in all, let’s say, “strategic non-nuclear” areas. It seems self-evident that this approach to the “balance of power” does not appear to be a stabilising one, to put it mildly. True, so far, ensuring American superiority has encountered technological obstacles, at least in certain areas, for example, in the development and testing of hypersonic weapons. Although, of course, the first flight of the promising B-21 heavy bomber once again confirmed the status of the United States as a leading military superpower.

At the same time, the format of the “nuclear five”, which is currently chaired by Russia, remains operational. Of course, this is in no way a replacement or alternative to either traditional arms control or, for example, the agenda of the UN Security Council (even though the list of permanent members of which is exactly the same). However, this platform is very useful for “checking notes,” including regarding perceived threats. During the Western “presidencies” of recent years, the agenda was somewhat restricted to discussing nuclear risks, however, despite the importance of this area, the relevance of all three pillars of the NPT remains: disarmament, non-proliferation and the peaceful use of nuclear energy. And it is the “nuclear five” that bears special responsibility.

Speaking about the issues of the arms race, one cannot help but touch upon space—or rather, even what is commonly called on international platforms the prevention of an arms race in outer space (PAROS). A split has clearly emerged in this area—more precisely, in this space. The problem of preventing the weaponization of outer space is being actively replaced by theses about the need for “sustainability” and “responsible behaviour”, to the point that it is being proposed that PAROS as an approach should be recognized as an outdated “framework” that must be abandoned. Perhaps, in immediate terms, a sharp escalation in outer space is unlikely, but there is understandable concern about the formation of political conditions for dividing space activities into “right” and “wrong.”

Returning to nuclear topics—the internal Russian discussion on scenarios, consequences and possible conditions for the use of nuclear weapons, the interim outcome of which was summed up by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Valdai Forum in 2023, became, perhaps, the most substantive public discussion of this issue in many years. The discussion attracted great attention from foreign observers. There is no doubt that issues of nuclear deterrence (and of strategic deterrence more generally) will remain one of the main topics for the domestic scientific and expert community; and for foreign ones too.

In a purely military sense, for obvious reasons, the main event for Russia was a successful—let’s not be afraid of this word—strategic defensive operation within the framework of the Special Military Operation (SMO). The political dimension of what happened is still being formed, but opponents are clearly puzzled. Of course, the very fact that in the armed conflict with the Ukraine we are playing “on defence” makes one think about many things, albeit with all the necessary reservations about the unprecedented military-technical and economic support of the so-called West. At the same time, talk about how the Russian general-purpose forces would be weakened as a result of the SMO has somewhat died down: indeed, discussions about “weakening” look strange in the presence of an army that is fighting in a real way, and a military-industrial complex that is increasing production, not to mention the sustainability of the national economy and finance. Which, of course, does not in any way exclude questions about certain actions and decisions, but we will engage in public debriefing after the end of hostilities.

The actions of Western countries and, first and foremost, of Western military industry are not well understood. Against the background of very emotional conversations about the need to increase the production of all types of weapons, military and special equipment, and, first of all, various means of destruction—that is, ammunition—in practice, the successes have been very limited. Perhaps there are not enough resources (including labour), perhaps there is no readiness for significant investments without guarantees of long-term demand. But it is Western military assistance that remains the key factor preventing the demilitarisation of the Ukraine.

The situation is completely different in the Far East and in the Indo-Pacific as a whole: the Korean Peninsula looks almost like a centre of military industry; Australia, Japan, and India are actively involved in the production of ammunition; and China (including Taiwan) clearly demonstrates its readiness for “large-scale forms” of armed confrontation. This also applies to the strategic sphere: the US-Korea Washington Declaration [between the USA and the Republic of Korea –ed.] may become a new standard for allied relations in the field of planning and supporting operations of nuclear forces, and the trilateral format for exchanging information on missile launches of a potential enemy—launched at the end of this year between Washington, Seoul and Tokyo—is openly positioned, among other things, as a tool to contain Beijing. Two years ago, the author of these lines, in a similar summary, noted that everyone had stopped being shy, and that 2022 would not allow anyone to become bored. The scale of the unfolding drama exceeded the wildest forecasts. For 2024, we will limit ourselves to the modest hope of surviving until the next New Year’s summing up.

https://slavyangrad.org/2024/01/06/mili ... more-10785

******

Ukraine: 2023 Was a Year of Disappointment – Ever-Present Corruption, Military Failure, and Flight From the Country
JANUARY 5, 2024

By Dmitri Kovalevich – Jan 1, 2024

Image

Dmitri Kovalevich is the special correspondent in Ukraine for Al Mayadeen English. He writes a monthly situation report as well as occasional special reports. This is his situation report at the end of 2023.

For Ukraine, the year 2023 was far from comforting, notwithstanding the efforts by the country’s government and heavily-censored media to uplift the spirits of the population with promises of economic improvement and military victories in the new year.

The news at the end of the year makes clear, even to optimists, that everything promised by the West and by the Ukrainian authorities during the past two years has been mere words. The sole purpose of all the year-end, optimistic statements and promises is to induce Ukrainians to continue to suffer conditions of war and economic upheaval… for the interests of the NATO countries. The Western press would have the world believe that the conflict in Ukraine is all about the country’s independence and sovereignty. But in reality, Ukrainians have become the cheap foot soldiers of the Western imperialist countries. Tragically, hundreds of thousands of our compatriots did not live through 2023 and see the dawning of the year 2024.

Compulsory military conscription
One of the most difficult and controversial issues of the past year in Ukraine has been the country’s compulsory military conscription. As resistance to the war has grown, conscription has come to increasingly resemble slave markets of yore. At the end of 2023, Ukrainian authorities and deputies to the Rada (national legislature) are discussing changes to the conscription law to require military registration by women, the elderly, and youth aged 18 or higher. Russian senator Igor Kostyukevich, who represents the Kherson region, recently told the Russian state broadcaster RIA Novosti of cases he has learned of children in orphanages being taken into military service in Ukraine.

A draft law likely to be adopted early in the new year lowers the age of military service from 27 to 25 years and it introduces compulsory, military training of three months duration for Ukrainians between the ages of 18 and 24.

The amended conscription law will strengthen the power of authorities to identify those of the age of military service age and track down those who have managed to avoid it. The draft law introduces easier procedures to summon conscripts, including by email and through employers providing information directly to recruiters. Presently, conscripts are summoned by letter or by a visit from a police or conscription officer.

Ukrainians between the ages of 18 and 60 will henceforth need to carry a military registration document with them at all times and present it when requested by an officer.

A catastrophic war by Ukraine
Ukrainian experts are comparing the present conflict to the Paraguayan War of the 1860s, notorious for killing some 70 percent of the country’s population of the day. Ordinary Ukrainian children are writing letters to Santa Claus asking him to protect their parents. “Please don’t let them take my dad and mom to the army to die. Otherwise, I will become an orphan,” a Telegram posting writes, displaying a note written by a six-year-old named Olya.

2023 was a year of Ukraine losing the war on all fronts. This was stated in late December by Kirill Veres, commander of the ‘K-2’ battalion of the 54th brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, speaking to the ICTV television channel. “If we talk about the war on all fronts, we are losing. Where are we winning? I don’t know, I can’t say. We are surviving. These are two different things: doing something to win, and acting to simply avoid perishing.”

“It is a very difficult time for us,” said Veres. He believes that overheated expectations from the summertime ‘counter-offensive’ of the AFU helped lead to the present situation. He says that Ukrainian men who are forcibly conscripted are very bad at fighting.

Even the head of the Defense Ministry’s intelligence service, Kirill Budanov, has admitted that conscripted Ukrainians do not want to fight. He says the effectiveness of forcibly conscripted Ukrainians “is almost zero“.

The Associated Press reports on December 18 that as winter approaches, Ukrainian soldiers “worry that Russia is better equipped for battle and are frustrated about being on the defensive again in a grueling war. Some doubt the judgment of their leaders.

“Discontent among Ukrainian soldiers — once extremely rare and expressed only in private — is now more common and out in the open.”

Even among those Ukrainians who previously shared pro-Western sentiments, frustration and fatigue have been increasingly evident. Men are fleeing the country dressed as women, mothers smuggle their sons out in trunks, and at the front, deserters who do not want to fight but cannot return home are living for months at a time in the ruins of buildings.

In the Poltava province of Ukraine, located east of the Dnieper River and app. 125 km southwest of Kharkiv, conscription has netted only 13 percent of eligible men; in Sumy region, it is only eight per cent. This despite routine raids by conscription officials of enterprises, gyms and parks, and dwellings.

During the summer and fall counteroffensive, almost all units, including the most combat-ready ones, suffered high casualties. Some brigades have endured three changes in personnel.

In late December, Taras Chmut, a Ukrainian ultranationalist and head of the Turn Live Foundation, acknowledged in a broadcast interview that there are virtually no people left in the country to recruit to the military. “We need to think how to make sure that we (Ukrainians) do not run out of army personnel,” he warns.

“There are no people. Many have left the country, while many others were drafted into service but were killed or wounded. If we throw away the lives of recruits, and sometimes that happens, then unfortunately we will just mathematically run out of bodies.”

Also, in his opinion, the Russian military is technologically superior to Ukraine’s military. “Russia produces airplanes, ships, submarines, helicopters, tanks, artillery, ammunition, gunpowder, explosives, aircraft ammunition, cruise missiles, ballistic missiles. What do we have? Unfortunately, much less.” says the Ukrainian rightist.

Lose territory, of lose a country?
For this reason, even former Ukrainian MP and far-right nationalist Ihor Mosiychuk is raising the question of what is more important: recapturing territories lost to Russia’s army, or preservation of the Ukrainian nation. He is calling for negotiations. “We have all our strategists talking about the liberation of territories, but I want to put the question in a different way: why are we not talking about the preservation of the nation? After all, it is clear that territories can be returned, but a nation that loses itself cannot.

“Of what use are territories to a lost nation?” asks Mosiychuk.

Rumors of an imminent military coup against the current governing regime in Ukraine and of revolts by military units whose funding has been cut significantly are running rampant in Ukrainian society. Even many pro-Western Ukrainians are acknowledging that in the eyes of the rulers of the Western countries, Ukrainians will never be equal, no matter how contemptuously the latter may regard and treat non-European peoples.

“Maybe it is time to recognize that the whole course of 30 years since the beginning of Ukraine’s independence, in which Euro-Atlantic integration is our national idea, has failed. A national, civic dream –call it a religion – held out the prospect of joining NATO and the European Union. But that has exhausted itself.

“The dream of Ukraine’s accession to NATO and the European Union has led to war, a war between the West and Russia over Ukraine,” said Ukrainian political analyst Vadym Karasev recently in a broadcast by the ‘Novini live’ internet channel. He added that Ukraine’s new strategic culture may not be pacifist, but it should not be militarized either. We should work, work, and work, not fight”.

A war by the West and for the West
Ukrainian society has actually forgotten how to work and create. It has been pushed for many years towards warfare, paid for by Western countries. As a result, Ukraine’s infrastructure is crumbling and Ukrainian experts are thinking about the countries from which the workers of the future may be drawn (to be paid, for sure, by Western partners).

Many of our officials, even at the level of small towns, have become habituated to living off Western financial injections. All of them are making plans to enrich themselves for years to come, comforting themselves with the belief that the West owes a large debt to Ukraine because it has been fighting on behalf of Western interests. (This does not apply to many government officials who have already enriched themselves and have already managed to send their children or other family members to schools and universities in Western Europe and the United States.)

Ukraine’s infrastructure crumbling
Reconstruction is in full swing in the Russian-controlled territories of Ukraine. The city of Mariupol, for example, was all but destroyed in the spring and summer of 2022. Today, it is rising from the ashes not only with new housing and commercial buildings to replace those destroyed but also with an entire plan to makeover of the city, dominated for decades by highly polluting steelmaking right in the heart of its heart. A road and railway corridor along the northern coast of the Sea of Azov from the Rostov region all the way to Crimea (and beyond?) will be built or restored.

Ukrainian authorities, meanwhile, are dealing with a crumbling subway (‘metro’) system in Kiev, to take just one example of infrastructure in serious need of repair. The Degtyarevsky Bridge over the Dnieper River in the capital city recently collapsed during repairs that were unrelated to any military action by Russia. The city’s Metro Bridge, carrying vehicle traffic and the ‘Red Line’ of the metro system (one of three lines), is facing lengthy closure for urgently needed repairs. City council official Andriy Vitrenko calls the situation “catastrophic” because the city already suffers from a shortage of bridges across the Dnieper River.

Six stations of the city’s ‘Blue Line’ metro closed earlier this month for an expected six months due to flooding and unstable soil conditions surrounding them.

There have been far too few repairs and maintenance of the Kiev metro system since Soviet times (more than 30 years ago). Investigations are said to be underway to determine how much outright negligence may be responsible for the recent line and station closings.

Ongoing corruption and the rising discontent it is causing
Unable to win a military clash with Russia, and with hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers having perished, irritation and discontent may at some point drive large numbers of Ukrainians to protest this continuing war. The regime of Volodymyr Zelensky will be hard-pressed to mobilize its security apparatus to suppress such protests.

Ukrainians are particularly irritated by the numerous corruption scandals that have haunted the country throughout the past year. Corruption has flourished precisely due to the ongoing military actions against Russia and the obligatory conscription that ‘feeds’ these. Reports are widespread in Ukraine of military conscription officials accepting bribes to assist potential conscripts to avoid military service, notably by issuing fraudulent medical certificates. Some military officers are buying up real estate in Europe thanks to earnings from bribes received from those seeking to evade conscription. The situation became so bad this year that in August, the regime of President Zelensky replaced the officials in charge of conscription in every region of the country.

Corruption in purchases using Western aid funds has also become huge. Food for the military is purchased at prices 200-300% higher than market prices, while overpriced items not particularly needed in military shelters are being purchased (such as trendy frying pans for $19,000 each). It’s also worth noting that individuals do not actually purchase items using foreign aid funds. In fact, many military personnel buy their own food, and civilian shelters may remain stay closed even during air raids. (See: Corruption exposed: the disturbing reality of Kyiv shelters, published in Voice of Europe, June 6, 2023.) Conditions of war also allow many civilian items of value purchased as civilian aid to be stolen and written off as if destroyed by war.

During this year’s Christmas vacation period, vacation operators say that the resorts and hotels in the Carpathian Mountains region in the west of Ukraine country have sold out all of their very expensive rooms (suites), while ordinary hotel and resort rooms selling for exorbitant prices are also full. These and many more such examples are evidence of a colossal stratification taking place in Ukrainian society between a very poor majority and a very rich minority. Even in the streets of Kiev and Lviv, one sees many, very expensive luxury cars, imported under the guise of humanitarian aid, while in a number of regions, public transport has stopped running, typically because drivers have been drafted into the armed forces.

And conflicts over military service
By the end of 2023, irritation and conflicts between the neo-Nazi paramilitary units (now formally incorporated into the armed forces) and units composed of conscripted soldiers are on the rise. Neo-Nazi leaders routinely refer to citizens seeking to avoid military service as “creatures” and “subhumans”. ‘Right Sector’ leader Dmiytri Yarosh stated in late November, “I cannot call them anything but an abomination that discredits the Nation.”

The scale of evasion of military service is really impressive. Every day, Ukrainian border guards catch dozens of illegal fugitives along the country’s western border. Dozens more are handed over each day by the border guards of neighboring, eastern European countries. Added to this are the estimated 6,000 men of military draft age who have left Ukraine legally. This was reported by the head of the Department of organization of Border Control of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine Igor Matviychuk.

The scheme of leaving Ukraine following marriage to mothers with many children has become popular recently. Fathers with three children or more under the age of 16 are exempt from military service and can even leave the country. Men of military age may also leave the country while acting as escorts for the disabled, and many do so. Disabled persons are reportedly being escorted out of the country multiple times by different people. Some male escapees go so far as to change the gender in their passports and dress as women to fool border guards.

At the end of December, an MP of Zelenskyy’s party, Maryana Bezuglaya, decided to conduct an Internet poll, inquiring into whether those evading conscription should be stripped of their civil rights. She conducted a survey asking whether men would be willing to lose their Ukrainian citizenship as the price of refusing compulsory military service. Of those surveyed, 74 per cent replied ‘yes’.

Such ambivalent attitudes to the country and its citizenship are increasingly common in Ukraine these days, even among radical nationalists. Growing numbers of Ukrainians are realizing that they are fighting and suffering due to NATO’s expansion policy, not for the independence and betterment of their country. Many look with envy at neighboring Belarus, which in 2020/2021 prevented a pro-Western,’color’ revolution similar to the one that occurred in Ukraine in 2013/2014 and culminated in a violent coup. The leaders and the people of Belarus have preserved the country’s industry and prevented internal strife along national grounds because they rejected the promises and siren songs of Western leaders.

In a published survey in 2019, well before the Russian military operation began in Ukraine, most Ukrainians considered the president of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, as the best foreign leader, beating out the then-chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel.

In 2024, against a background of anticipated, continued, military setbacks by Ukraine and reductions of Western aid funding, anti-Russian sentiments may be expected to ease in Ukraine while anti-Western sentiments and dislike for the NATO military alliance will grow. Let us hope this year will see an end to the military conflict with Russia and the reformatting of Ukraine into an independent country on the model of neighboring Belarus.

https://orinocotribune.com/in-ukraine-2 ... e-country/

******

Yes, Finally!

Russia begins to use North Korean ballistic missiles.

Russia has used ballistic missiles and launchers supplied by North Korea in its war on Ukraine, the US has said. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby called it a "significant and concerning escalation" relating to Pyongyang's support for Russia.He said the US would raise the matter at the UN Security Council and impose additional sanctions on those working to facilitate arms transfers. Moscow has denied any such collaboration.Hours after the White House made the accusations, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un called for missile launch vehicle production to be expanded in the country.

The next thing you know Russia will start using Qassam rockets. HAMAS promised to supply those, because, obviously, Russia "runs out of missiles" all the time.

Image

Listening to this drivel from Kirby the "admiral" is hilarious. But then again, you all know how US media-intel complex works:

Image

Sometimes I think--it is inescapable--that they do this on purpose to parade the US in a front of the whole world as a land of nincompoops, and they do it for some unknown heinous reason beyond our comprehension. But then again, when you don't have class and culture--as most inside the beltway don't--it is difficult to understand that the more such a BS is spewed the more it exhibits one's insecurities and stupidity. So, the classic no-no of not disclosing one's cards in the card game happens.

Here is Larry with his excellent piece from yesterday:

Panic among Western analysts about Ukraine’s looming defeat has escalated. Robert Clark, writing in the U.K. Telegraph, wailed his lamentation in an op-ed titled, Ukraine’s new year may end with a brutal Western betrayal. Clark blames Western leaders for Ukraine’s debacle.

In general, the remainder of Western institutions of governance, military and media is utterly destroyed. Now they just continue to dance on the rubble, while the world looks on in amazement at sheer pettiness and stupidity of the combined West.

Meanwhile, Israel continues its genocide in Gaza against the background of very little military gains, if any, while sustaining large casualties. But no worries, Israel didn't introduce the best IDF formations yet, you know--US Army.


The White House is worried that the conflict in Gaza could expand to other parts of the Middle East and is drawing up plans for a possible US response if that happens, Politico has reported, citing informed officials. Internal discussions are underway in the administration of US President Joe Biden about scenarios that could see Washington drawn into a major war in the region, the outlet said in an article on Thursday. The potential for a wider conflict in the Middle East is growing, said sources including a senior Biden administration official. The events of the past few days “have convinced some in the administration that the war in Gaza has officially escalated far beyond the strip’s borders,” Politico wrote.

Hey, that's their territory--to fight subpar opponents. There is no bigger honor in the US Army than to die for Israel, especially after being hit by Russian North Korean ballistic missile. That's Gogol or Kafka's level absurdity in what's left of the Republic.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2024/01 ... nally.html

*******

The Neocon's Biggest Defeat Since Vietnam And There Is Nothing They Can Do | Ambassador Chas Freeman

Neutrality Studies



Calling the managers of the current fiasco 'neocons' let's the Dems off the hook...In truth, the designation, like 'neoliberal' is meaningless.

*******

Zelensky Economist interview: Dead Man Walking

Martin Jay

January 6, 2024

How much longer can he keep the farce up that Ukraine is a real contender in the war and has a reasonable chance of winning?

Ukraine’s President Zelensky probably didn’t have much of a Christmas nor new year celebrations. What’s there to celebrate? After coming back from Washington just a couple of weeks before with a cheque of just 200 million dollars, rather than the 50 bn which he was hoping for, he must have done some hard thinking over the Christmas period. How much longer has he got as president? How much longer can he keep the farce up that Ukraine is a real contender in the war and has a reasonable chance of winning? In Ukraine itself, few believe the war can be won under the present circumstances of being desperately low on both military kit and soldiers. Even his own commander in chief often despairs of the situation and criticizes his boss, with a number of now ex advisors who are happy to run down Zelensky. “Deluded” is the word which keeps coming up. They claim he is the only one who believes now that the war is still a viable option and that victory is still something which can be aimed for.

And so it comes as no surprise that he turns to his only friends left in the world to help him: western media. This press pack has invested so much in a narrative which supports Ukraine and demonises Russia without even a glance at the facts that it shouldn’t have been a surprise to see The Economist – the high-brow economics magazine which is so pro-EU that Brussels uses it as a mouthpiece for its own failed policies – stepping up to the mark. And then there was the follow-up interview from Britain’s own arse wipe tabloid The Sun, whose journalist didn’t disappoint with so many NATO talking points in his copy that you might be mistaken in believing that it was written by NATO’s own press people. Where, for the love of God, do they find journalists like Jerome Starkey who, bless, probably believes that 600,000 people have died in Ukraine, “with most of them being Russian soldiers”. Hilarious.

But the Economist piece, which allowed Zelensky to continue the theme of Putin being a savage leader who, red in tooth and claw, was a madman who was going to invade European countries and eat all our children was hard to take seriously. Apart from anything else, it clashes with Joe Biden’s own line which is that Putin is down and out and has “lost” the Ukraine war. Can they have it both ways? Does this suggest that Zelensky’s media team are no longer even communicating with the White House?

In many ways, the Economist piece which made Zelensky look more and more ridiculous, with his name calling of Putin (“animal”) just portrayed the Ukrainian president as a dead man walking. Putin has never shown any interest at all in invading nor attacking western Europe but that doesn’t stop Zelensky keeping this false claim alive and repeated in the interview with The Sun. Neither NATO nor its servile western call centre journalists need bother with facts when they indulge themselves with these kindergarten fantasies.

The reality for Zelensky is that the war can never be won by his own army and that now he must be looking at ways to keep the party alive, just to stay in power for one more year, if possible. We are no longer looking at a wartime leader leading from the front, more now a corrupt despot who will now obsess over his new challenge: political survival. The much-awaited aid package hoped for in January, if it comes, will be a sticking plaster for the gaping wound. In reality his only hope for survival is to keep his cabal well-fed with the riches they are able to siphon off the war racket. As these amounts reduce in time, the reality that they decide to increase the amount of military kit they send to Libya for fast cash will only accelerate Zelensky’s downfall, or push him faster towards a peace deal with Putin so that the new cow to be milked is no longer western arms, but EU restructuring aid. But the new aid package which Biden is trying to secure is not expected to be anything like the 50bn which got held hostage by U.S. senators hell-bent on securing America’s borders. It’s hard to see how Zelensky can keep this farce going, but we can be sure that it will be western journalists who will help him with his own nefarious PR campaign and the lies that it defecates towards a gullible western audience who presumably are happy to read articles about the war which only refer to Russian losses but omit to mention Ukraine’s.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... n-walking/

******

Didn't live up to expectations
January 7, 22:14

Image

German tanks were created for exercises, but not for real combat operations

A commission from Germany, which visited a repair center in Lithuania for German tanks delivered to Ukraine, was unpleasantly surprised by the number of equipment that failed due to internal defects in mechanics and electronics. The number of technically defective tanks is comparable to the number destroyed by Russian troops.

There are still problems with lengthy logistics, lack of sufficient spare parts, and poor translation of technical documentation. Even in Lithuania, far from the front line, mechanics are forced to improvise because they simply do not know how to repair German Leopard tanks.

A German officer admitted to Der Spiegel magazine that German tanks wear out much faster in combat conditions than in peacetime. Based on the experience of the Bundeswehr in Mali, we can say that a mileage of 10 thousand km in combat conditions is equal to 100 thousand km in peacetime, the officer claims. Added to this is the problem of the need for complex maintenance of German battle tanks, which must be carried out at the factory.

“Attempts at repair by the Ukrainian army lead to additional damage to battle tanks,” concludes one of the members of the German commission that visited Lithuania.

A Ukrainian officer from a unit equipped with Leopard-2 tanks draws Der Spiegel's attention to the fragility of the tank's tracks. Loose track tension leads to breakdowns, which is a disaster in combat conditions. Ukrainian soldiers have to constantly monitor this feature of German tanks.


Strange discoveries, considering that 2/3 of the tanks were initially delivered after repair and restoration. Only Swedish and Norwegian cars were relatively new. The rest were obviously not of the best quality, and except for the very stubborn ones, few of the serious experts here or abroad seriously expected that the Leopards would be successful, including in connection with their reliability in Russian conditions. And we are also talking about “Leopard 2”. With "Leopard 1" everything is clear. Expecting success from them is the same as expecting that the restored T-62s will seriously change the situation at the front on our side. Well, the Russian army, as expected and routinely, destroyed the reputation of the Leopards and Challengers. The Americans took notice of this and do not allow Abrams to be used in active battles. It's a pity - it would be interesting to see what they can actually do, besides participating in colonial wars and ridiculous PR. "Bradley" and "Strikers" have already been shown.

I remember in 2016, when ISIS destroyed a bunch of Turkish Leopards near Al-Bab, everyone blamed it on incompetent Turkish tank crews and stupid Turkish generals who lost a lot of equipment. But as we see, it was not only the problems of the Turkish army.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8880020.html

It will be a shock
January 7, 13:53

Image

Former prosecutor Lutsenko announced 500,000 losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and monthly losses of 30,000.
He offers to admit the truth and then everyone will mobilize.

(Video at link.)

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8878885.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:02 pm

Obstacles
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/09/2024

Image

Little by little, the Western media continues to publish some new data on the investigations of the attack that, in September 2022, exploded and disabled three of the four Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines. In the last year, especially since the moment in which that the journalist Seymour Hersh provided an alternative theory to that of Russian sabotage that the European Union had tried to impose as official, all Western sources point to a group that acted from Ukraine. Always leaving open the possibility that there was no intervention, or even knowledge, of the Ukrainian Government, German, Dutch, American and Polish media have pointed to a Polish tourist travel company as a front for a Ukrainian intelligence operation, which would have financed In this way, the rental of the Andromeda sports yacht, the explosives and the travel necessary for the attack.

Last year, the media already referred to a group of six people from Ukraine and with European Union passports - later it was also confirmed that they were false passports - as the executing arm of a plan in which they openly exonerated Zelensky although not necessarily Zaluzhny. His name is the most repeated when presenting a possible insider of the plan that would make it possible for the head of State to claim not to know the actions of elements that are part of the State's security structures. For the moment, one of the members of the alleged group has been identified and located, a young soldier from Dnipropetrovsk who, at the time of publication of the Polish article detailing his story (although not his name), was still forming part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Subsequently, the American media also found a very useful scapegoat: a veteran of both Ukrainian military and civilian intelligence (GUR and SBU), currently imprisoned and openly in conflict with Andriy Ermak, head of the President's Office and right-hand man. by Volodymyr Zelensky. That soldier is responsible for the logistics of the operation, although, yes, giving credibility to the denials of the Ukrainian intelligence services about his participation in the events.

The media have also revealed data about the investigation, even more suspicious than the events themselves, especially due to the silence maintained by the main European country affected, Germany, whose critical infrastructures suffered this attack of international terrorism. What's more, Boris Pistorius, current Minister of Defense, the most popular politician according to German polls and a possible replacement for Chancellor Scholz, still clings to the theory of the Russian false flag . He does so despite the fact that, as media from at least four countries, Germany among them, have published, all clues point to Ukraine. The German Government cannot also claim not to know the details of the investigation, since, according to Der Spiegel , Olaf Scholz's office follows the events on a day-to-day basis and is regularly informed of any progress. Germany's silence is, possibly, the clearest sign that the enemy that the European Union sought when denouncing the events is not among its official opponents but among its theoretical allies.

The news published yesterday by media such as The Wall Street Journal are representative for similar reasons. The passage of time without evidence with which to blame Russia is the most obvious sign that it is not Russia that has the most to hide in this matter, as was clear from the beginning, when the Kremlin clung to the possibility of an explosion. accidental rather than accepting the evidence. Despite the certainty that the European representatives showed - unlike the Americans, who showed their joy, but did not point out Moscow so clearly - of Russian guilt, the theory of self-bombing always made no sense. More than a year after the events, the theory also lacks even circumstantial evidence with which to continue maintaining that narrative. And it is not the Russian Federation that seeks to hinder the investigations, but the NATO allied countries, one more indication of who acted to sabotage the gas pipeline that directly linked what was the continent's main energy partner with its main client.

The hypothesis of the pro-Ukrainian group that would have acted using the Andromeda yacht in a plan managed from Warsaw must have put Poland in an uncomfortable position. The need of the main affected party and its allies to avoid airing dirty laundry on any country other than Russia has kept the situation under control. So far, no one has demanded explanations from Warsaw in the same way that Zelensky or Zaluzhny has not been pressed for answers or Olaf Scholz has been asked why his country seems to have no interest in clarifying what happened in which The The Wall Street Journal yesterday described it as “the largest act of sabotage on the European continent since World War II.”

The change of Government in Poland makes it easier to cast doubt on Polish actions throughout the investigation. In a detail that until now had not been revealed, The Wall Street Journal , which once again emphasizes that practically all European officials accept the hypothesis of Ukrainian guilt as valid, accuses Poland of having obstructed the investigation. After a year in which it has become increasingly clear that NATO countries have withheld available information to avoid blaming an ally, the outlet states that “any suggestion that Poland, a member of the NATO Treaty Organization, may be withholding information about the attack against an ally could undermine confidence in the alliance, which is facing one of the greatest tests since its creation.” The priority is not to know who blew up Nord Stream, how they did it or who they wanted to punish, but to guarantee the credibility and trust of NATO.

Almost comically, the outlet mentions Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk as the hope that things will change. The investigation considers going to the new prime minister's office for help. Tusk, even more pro-European than his predecessor, has distinguished himself by favoring and protecting Ukraine unconditionally, so it is unlikely that he will endanger Kiev's position by uncovering Ukrainian guilt - with Polish complicity - in an act of terrorism. international. What's more, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Tusk Government, Radek Sikorski, was one of the people who most quickly expressed his joy. “Thank you, United States,” he wrote that day alongside the image of the first explosion.

According to The Wall Street Journal , Poland immediately detected a group of six people that seemed suspicious. The article states that “a port official, who suspected five men and one woman, who were communicating in a mix of Russian and Ukrainian, alerted the police. On September 19, the Polish border guard registered the identification of the crew, who presented European Union passports and received permission to continue their journey, sailing north, where, according to investigators, they planted the explosives.” Poland admitted the information six months after the events at the request of Germany, which had obtained the information from the secret services of the Netherlands, which in turn obtained the clue directly from Ukraine.

The secret services of the Netherlands were also the ones who detected a Ukrainian plot to explode the Nord Stream months before the events occurred. Upon learning of the plans, which were transmitted to his American allies, the CIA director traveled to kyiv to, supposedly, demand its stoppage.

Fifteen months after the events, the scant information published in the media makes clear the complicity of several countries, which, by action or omission, allowed a plan that had been detected to advance and made it possible for a group of six people on a sports yacht to , which were also suspicious for some local Polish authorities, placed explosives in one of the most controlled seas on the planet. The result was the physical destruction of the link between the two most important countries on the continent, but also the joy of the United States, which saw the disappearance of Nord Stream as an opportunity. The many months of silence make it clear that the European Union's quick attempt to blame its Moscow enemy was nothing more than a way to hide and protect the real culprits.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/09/obstaculos-2/

Google Translator

I find the '6 Ukes in a boat' explanation implausible and mere cover for US involvement.

******

What's happening in the NWO zone: chronicle for January 7-8
January 9, 2024
Rybar

Image

Russian troops again launched massive attacks on enemy targets in several so-called regions. Ukraine: explosions occurred in Kharkov , Dnepropetrovsk , Khmelnytsky , Zaporozhye and Odessa regions . It is characteristic that this time the Ukrainian authorities did not exaggerate the effectiveness of air defense systems, admitting the interception of only 26 out of 59 declared targets.

Meanwhile, in the special operation zone, fierce fighting continues in the Donetsk direction , including in the area of ​​the Avdeevsky fortified area . Units of the Russian Armed Forces managed to increase the control zone on the flanks at Pervomaisky and Ocheretino , and clashes were also reported in dachas near the settling tanks of the coke plant.

In the Maryinsky sector, Russian troops are preparing for an offensive in the direction of Kurakhovo through Georgievka . In recent days, the assault troops of the Russian Armed Forces managed to advance 300 meters and gain a foothold on the territory of the Church of St. George . And to the south, heavy battles for Novomikhailovka and Pobeda continue .

Massive attack on objects on the territory of Ukraine on January 8

Russian troops launched massive attacks on enemy targets in several so-called regions. Ukraine, including using kamikaze drones "Geran-2" and hypersonic missiles "Dagger".

Kharkov : most of the arrivals were recorded in the Kiev district of the city. One of the missiles hit the educational workshop of the lyceum at the FED machine-building plant . Whether the enterprise itself was damaged is currently unknown.

Krivoy Rog : warehouses and a workshop for the production of drones on the territory of the Solnechnaya Gallery shopping center , where orders from Ukroboronprom were carried out , were hit . Another of the munitions hit light rail tracks used for military purposes.

Khmelnitsky : in addition to Starokonstantinov , where the military airfield of the same name is located, explosions also occurred in Shepetivka , a major transport hub through which Western weapons are transferred.

Zaporozhye : according to preliminary data, at least one infrastructure facility was hit. Local residents reported temporary power and water supply outages.

Odessa : Air defense systems were reported to be operating in several localities. Despite the assertions of the Ukrainian command that all drones have been intercepted, footage that has appeared on the Internet suggests the opposite.

The next wave of strikes by the Russian Armed Forces in 2024 again hit industrial facilities associated with the military-industrial complex. It is significant that, unlike previous raids, the Ukrainian authorities recognized the inability of air defense systems to repel massive raids: according to the General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, out of 60 ammunition, anti-aircraft gunners managed to intercept only 26 targets.

However, some of the Russian media also rushed to exaggerate the success of today's attack, announcing large-scale problems with energy supply in several regions of Ukraine, including the Dnepropetrovsk region . This is most likely due to the sharp deterioration of the weather and the consequences of previous Russian strikes.

As we have noted more than once , in order to weaken the production potential of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex, it is necessary to wisely select targets and allocate a sufficient number of missiles to them. A hit from one or two missiles will not cause significant damage to the enterprise.

Shelling of front-line territories January 1-7, 2024

In the first week of the new year, Ukrainian formations launched massive attacks on the border and rear regions of Russia . For this, the Ukrainian Armed Forces used Vampire and Alder multiple launch rocket systems, as well as kamikaze drones and cruise missiles.

The enemy carried out at least seven combined attacks on the Crimean Peninsula , firing Neptune and Storm Shadow missiles. Objects in Sevastopol and Saki were hit , but thanks to the professional work of Russian anti-aircraft gunners, significant damage was avoided.

In the border regions, the largest number of attacks from the Ukrainian Armed Forces occurred in the long-suffering Belgorod region . At least 16 people were injured and one more was killed ; multiple destructions of residential buildings and civilian infrastructure were recorded in Belgorod itself.

In the Bryansk region, enemy activity decreased: Belaya Berezka came under fire , several Ukrainian Armed Forces drones were intercepted on approach to Bryansk . And in the neighboring Kursk region, the enemy shelled Troitskoye , Kozino and Zheleznogorsk , where temporary problems with power supply arose due to damage to the substation.

The intensity of shelling in the Donetsk agglomeration has approximately doubled compared to the last week of 2023 . As a result of the strikes , nine people were killed, another 37 were injured, most of them on New Year's Eve , when Donetsk came under massive fire from the HIMARS and Vampire MLRS.

A steadily tense situation remains on the left bank of the Kherson region : here the intensity of attacks remains at the same level - approximately 400 shells per week.

In the near future, we should expect new massive attacks on both front-line and rear areas. And given the latest enemy attacks on the Republic of Crimea , this region may be the focus of attention of the Ukrainian command.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

In the Starobelsky direction, the previous configuration of the front remains the same. Near Kupyansk, Russian troops strike the positions of Ukrainian formations in Sinkovka and conduct positional battles on the line Zagoruykovka - Timkovka - Ivanovka - Kislovka . Footage of kamikaze drones hitting several Leopard tanks also appeared on the Internet . Meanwhile, in the Svatovsko - Kremensky sector, units of the Russian Armed Forces are attempting to expand the zone of control in the area of ​​the Tor ledge , while at the same time offensives are being carried out towards Terny and Yampolovka .

In the Soledar direction, Russian assault troops attack the positions of Ukrainian formations north and south of Bogdanovka . On the southern flank of Bakhmut, the parties are fighting fierce battles at the Kleshcheevka - Andreevka line . The Ukrainian command is transferring additional forces to the site, trying to hold back the onslaught of the Russian Armed Forces.

Image
In the Donetsk direction, units of the Russian Armed Forces continue the operation to encircle the Avdeevsky fortified area . According to Ukrainian resources, Russian troops have advanced in the eastern part of Pervomaisky south of Avdeevka and north towards Ocheretino , but the exact configuration in the area remains unknown. The fighting is taking place in the area of ​​the Stepovoye and Coke Chemical Plants : in the dachas near the AKHZ settling tanks , the enemy attempted to attack the positions of Russian troops with a tank, but was blown up by a minefield.

Image
In the Yuzhnodonetsk direction, heavy fighting for Novomikhailovka and near the village of Pobeda continues . The liberation of Marinka opened the way to Kurakhovo : now Georgievka stands in the way of the Russian troops , on the outskirts of which the assault troops of the Russian Armed Forces were able to gain a foothold on the territory of the Church of St. George , advancing about 300 meters.


In the Orekhovsky sector, the fighting near Rabotino continues unabated : to the west of the settlement, the Russian Armed Forces attacked enemy positions, managing to occupy several strong points. In the Verbovoye area , due to bad weather, the sides are using drones and artillery. There are no active hostilities, and access to the positions is possible only with tracked armored vehicles. At the same time, at night, Ukrainian DRGs carry out attacks that are promptly stopped by Russian troops.


In the Kherson direction, the situation remains the same: in the Krynok region , although Ukrainian formations are suffering heavy losses, they continue to transfer manpower to the left bank of the Dnieper . And on the islands there are shooting battles with the use of mortars, and there is a slow but confident advance of the Russian Armed Forces. On the right bank of the river, four enemy air defense systems were destroyed over the past week, which made the work of the Russian Aerospace Forces easier: air strikes were carried out on Zmeevka and Frolov Island . In addition to heavy losses, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are also experiencing problems with housing: according to local residents, Ukrainian military personnel, despite promises, refuse to pay for accommodation.

Shelling of rear areas and residential areas

Image
Over the past two days, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have tried several times to attack populated areas of the Bryansk region with drones. At least three raids were repelled and four targets were destroyed in the skies over the region. At the same time, the enemy fired at the settlements of Belaya Berezka and Lemeshovka . There were no casualties.

Image
In the neighboring Kursk region, the village of Kozino, Rylsky district, was shelled : houses were damaged, and power outages were observed. No civilians were harmed.

Image
Most arrivals were recorded in the Belgorod region . The border areas bore the brunt. Thus, arrivals were recorded in the following settlements: Bezymeno , Grafovka , Dolgoye , Zhuravlevka , Kolotilovka , Krasnoye , Rozhdestvenka , Sereda , Stary Khutor , Terezovka and Shebekino . And in Bogun - Gorodok , Shchetinovka and Murom , the enemy again used UAVs to attack the civilian population.

In addition, on the morning of January 8 and at night of the same day, Russian air defense systems destroyed several targets in the skies over the Belgorod region . During the evening attack, Ukrainian forces once again used the RM -70 Vampire multiple launch rocket system to terrorize the civilian population. The Russian Ministry of Defense reported the interception of ten rockets over the region. Four residential buildings were damaged, as well as seven cars, four of which were burned. According to preliminary data, three people received shrapnel wounds. Ambulance crews transported the victims to the nearest hospital and provided them with all the necessary medical care. Emergency and emergency services personnel continue to work at the scene.

Image
Over the past two days, the intensity of attacks on the Donetsk agglomeration remained relatively low. This time, the Kuibyshevsky, Kirovsky and Petrovsky districts of Donetsk , as well as Makeevka , Peski and Gorlovka , were under fire . At the same time, UAF drones again attacked civilians in Staromikhailovka and the Petrovsky district of the regional capital. According to preliminary data, from January 7 to 8, three civilians were injured in the Kirov and Kuibyshev regions , as well as Gorlovka .

Image
The enemy still continues to terrorize populated areas on the left bank of the Kherson region . The Ukrainian Armed Forces shelled more than ten settlements. In addition, the operation of air defense systems in Golaya Pristan and Radensk was reported . According to the observations of the regional governor, the coastal cities that suffer most from Ukrainian shelling are Kakhovka , Novaya Kakhovka , Tavriysk , Aleshki and Golaya Pristan .

Political events
That case when stolen money smells


Against the background of the corruption scandal with the new real estate of the mayor of Kiev Klitschko, the flooding of the capital, God forgive me, of Ukraine with shit is an outright mockery of the authorities against the local residents.

The city gradually falls into disrepair and turns into a fetid swamp. And one could, of course, habitually blame the Russians (we won’t be surprised if Moscow is declared guilty of insidious sabotage tomorrow).

It’s just that war is war, and the sewerage system and metro are out of order precisely because the local authorities stopped hiding their real attitude towards the people. A good owner always takes care of the livestock. But here there is no smell of such care (but, on the contrary, it stinks in a completely different way).

About a couple of illustrative cases of corruption in the Armed Forces of Ukraine

In the territories controlled by the Kyiv regime, corruption scandals continue to emerge: from March 16, 2022 to June 13, 2023, several companies received funds from the so-called Ministry of Defense. Ukraine, and then transferred them to the Eco-Trade Ukraine company , owned by the wife of Colonel of the Logistics Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Alexander Kozlovsky : as a result of the scheme, 170 million hryvnia were stolen.

An equally interesting incident occurred with the wife of the commander of the 35th Infantry Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Sergei Oleinik : in mid-2023, ownership of an area of ​​400 m² was registered in her name. And this is against the backdrop of the fact that the brigade commander’s wife does not work anywhere, and her husband’s official salary is not so high: therefore, she simply cannot have the funds to purchase such objects.

And this is against the backdrop of the fact that recently Ukrainian military personnel are increasingly complaining about problems with the supply of humanitarian aid - funds from collections and other material support simply do not reach the intended recipients, represented by units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And the well-known UAV operator and commander of the 59th Infantry Brigade with the call sign “ Madyar ” threatens in an obscene form to get even with those responsible after the end of hostilities.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

Are there any winners in the Russia-Ukraine war?

Yesterday I was reading a speech about the Russia-Ukraine war that was recently delivered by one of America’s most experienced and independent-minded diplomats who is now in semi-retirement. The speech exemplified both the merits and the drawbacks of his profession.

By nature, diplomats look for compromises that can result in negotiated settlements to conflicts. In the given instance, the logic of diplomacy is to say that none of the protagonists in the Russia-Ukraine war, both those named and those unnamed, meaning the foreign backers of the Zelensky regime, has achieved its maximal goals, and so all should sit down at a table and reach a settlement that satisfies none but puts an end to the killing.

However, sometimes there are clear winners and losers

If one has to look for a loser, Ukraine is the stand-out. It has lost in every dimension: lost territory; more than 500,000 killed and maimed soldiers; destroyed military hardware, including the Wunderwaffe received from the USA and Europe; economic collapse; heavy losses of population as millions of refugees fled West and East. This irremediable disaster is every day acknowledged by more mainstream media in the West and explains the reluctance of politicians in Washington and Brussels to continue funding the war.

As for winners, most commentators in the West, including the referenced diplomat in his recent speech, are reluctant to admit the obvious. The big winners from this war are the United States and Russia.

These commentators measure the success or failure of the United States in this latest foreign adventure against its stated aim at the outset: to deal devastating blows to the Russian armed forces and to the Russian economy, thereby ensuring that the country would be unable to unleash an aggressive war against any of its neighbors for decades to come. If I may translate this into standard English: to eliminate Russia from the short list of world powers and enable the United States to move on to its greater task of vanquishing China, and so ruling the roost unchallenged.

Of course, the United States has failed in this mission as we will see in a moment when we look at the other side of the coin, namely how Russia has fared.

But it would be an unforgivable mistake to take Washington at its word. I venture to say that the greater objective, which could not be stated publicly, was to reinforce American subjugation of Europe for the sake of financial gain and to bulk up for the showdown with China.

In this regard, the Ukraine war has paid off handsomely for Washington. The destruction of Nord Stream with the complicity of the German government completed the severance of Europe from cheap Russian pipeline gas that had been a steadfast American objective since the mid-1990s. Instead, Europe became dependent on American LNG, propelling the United States into a world beating position on energy markets and yielding windfall profits from sales to the Old Continent.

Inflated energy costs hastened the deindustrialization of Europe and redirection of investments in industrial capacity by European firms to the United States, where energy costs are three or four times lower. Meanwhile, cleaning out the stores of military weaponry in Europe to assist Kiev under Washington’s direction has meant that all European NATO countries are utterly dependent on new U.S. weaponry to refill their arsenals. Without such deliveries, they cannot presently resist a Russian ground offensive for more than a few days of intensive artillery battles. The European leadership understands this fatal weakness very well and it makes them utterly compliant with Washington’s wishes in all matters.

However, I believe this subjugation of Europe is against the laws of nature and is untenable. In the foreseeable future, there will be a revolt against Washington and/or the collapse of the European Union over its role as facilitator of American domination. We may expect the political forces now categorized by Western media as the ‘Extreme Right’ to lead the fight for national liberation and overthrow the shackles that Washington has forged. The June 2024 Europe-wide elections will be an important test.

What about Russia?

Serious commentators in the West all recognize that the Russian economy has shown unexpected resilience and that the war economy has yielded positive growth, while Europe stagnates or enters recession. Curiously, attention is drawn to the important role of military orders in Russia’s expanding economy as if that were a negative factor for predicting Russia’s future economic prospects. But if the military industrial complex has been for decades and remains today a major sponsor of research and industrial innovation in the United States, which is obvious as day to any investor in Boeing, for example, then why should it be any different for the Russian economy. To those with eyes to see and with minds open to the facts, it is clear that Russia is going through very fast paced reindustrialization in all sectors.

Observers of China have long told us that the country cannot easily be replaced by Vietnam or India as the world’s factory because they have learned to optimize the organization of production on the factory floor and in this regard they have gone well beyond the Western companies whose designs they turn into goods.

Meanwhile Russia has made its own breakthroughs. The time spent from establishing new product requirements for the armed forces in the field through the time needed to design and manufacture suitable products en masse was reduced from 7 years to 7 months during 2023 and this energy is spreading across the economy. The links between basic science, applied science and serial production were always very weak in Russia. No longer.

Import substitution has been a slogan in Russia ever since the West imposed harsh sanctions on the economy in the summer of 2014. Now, with the generalized reindustrialization of Russia, the notion has grown legs.

At the same time, Russia has continued its program of heavy investments in civilian infrastructure. The emphasis, of course, is on European Russia, which is being knit ever more closely together by newly opened world class intercity highways, high speed trains and new airports served by Russian built civilian planes. But more and more funding has been assigned to logistical solutions for the Far North, Eastern Siberia and the Pacific Maritime regions in support of the Northern sea route and in support of the extractive industries. All of this lays the groundwork for a fast growing national economy in the future.

And what about Russia’s military strength?

At the level of strategic weapons systems, the past couple of years have witnessed the completion of a modernization program for Russia’s nuclear triad that puts the country well ahead of the United States in this domain. Among the strategic weapons that are now being put into regular service are a new ICBM that carries multiple hypersonic attack missiles that can pulverize whole nations at a go.

But let us recall that even in the 1990s Russia’s status as a nuclear superpower was not doubted even if loudmouth American politicians insisted that the nukes were useless since a nuclear exchange would yield no winners. Instead, they pointed to the utterly demoralized and underequipped Russian conventional forces that performed so poorly in the Chechen wars at the end of the last century and were said to remain underpowered and unimpressive during the Georgian war of 2008.

The situation today is vastly different. The challenges of the Ukraine war have compelled Russia to equip and train what are arguably the strongest conventional armed forces on the Continent if not in the world.

A lot of Russian IT geniuses may have emigrated to the United States since the 1990s to work for Google and others in Silicon Valley. Still more fled abroad in the opening months of the Special Military Operation. But there is always a surfeit of talent in a field like this, and the loyal souls who stayed at their work desks have created Electronic Warfare technologies, reconnaissance and attack drones, as well as other essential instruments of defense and offense for the battlefield that even Russophobes at The Financial Times are compelled to recognize as world beating, as we saw on their pages several days ago. Russian tanks, armored personnel carriers, attack helicopters every day prove their superiority to NATO analogues on the battlefield, and this helps explain the 8:1 or 10:1 advantage in the kill rate of the Russian armies against the combined Ukraine-NATO troops today.

Until very recently, it was commonplace to find our mainstream commentators speaking of China as having the world’s second strongest military after the United States. Now I am reading on the pages of the FT that endemic corruption has been a blight on the Chinese military. It would appear that by trashing China, the editorial board is preparing the way for stating what is there for all to see: that Russia is now the number two military in the world.

Why is Russia not number one? Because Russia’s leadership has its mind on the ball. The Soviet Union sought to be a superpower, meaning capable of projecting force all across the globe. The Russian Federation has no such ambition. It seeks to be a hegemon in its own part of the world, meaning the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, and to be a major player at the global Board of Governors alongside peers that include the USA and China, among others. To do this Russia has almost no need for military bases abroad, and it has no more than you can count on one hand. It has no need of aircraft carriers, which it does not build, concentrating instead on corvette sized naval vessels that are armed with hypersonic and other devastating missiles, as well as nuclear submarines carrying ICBMs and also hypersonic missiles for use in regional hotspots. These are being turned out and commissioned in the shipyards at a fast rate, as we heard and saw over the past couple of months of official commissioning. Those shipyards, are, by the way, now run by one of the most capable managers in the country, VTB Bank CEO Andrei Kostin.

The lecturer whose speech I read yesterday spoke of Russia’s cutting ties with Western Europe as the end of 300 years of immersion in European culture, and the present pivot of Russian foreign policy to China and the Global South as driven by necessity, a kind of forced isolation.

To be sure, the current split from Europe may last a generation, since feelings are very bitter on both sides. However, even in present conditions, the ‘cancel Russia’ policies in Europe that we saw at the start of the Ukraine war are fading. In the domain of culture above all Russia is indispensable if audiences are not to die of boredom, and Russian divas are once again on our opera stages. I have little doubt that Russian stars of other performing arts will soon reappear here. When some kind of settlement to the war finally occurs, Russia will slowly make a comeback in Europe.

However, it is a false and under-informed opinion to see Russia’s pivot to what we used to call the Third World as something new. The foreign policy orientation of the Soviet Union was internationalist in the broadest sense. It made fast and true friends across Africa by supporting the national liberation movements. It did the same by supporting Castro and other leaders in Latin America striving to get out from under the boot of Washington in their hemisphere. As for East Asia, apart from China, with which relations blew hot and cold, there was active cultivation of relations with Indonesia, with the countries of Indochina during Soviet times. But whereas the objective of Soviet policy was formation of blocs where possible, the RF objective is to release countries from control by Washington and its allies so that they may pursue their own national interests, which may diverge from Russia’s in many ways.

The single most flagrant error in the analysis of the enlightened and independent minded diplomat whose lecture caught my attention was to measure Russia’s success or failure in the Ukraine war by what we impute to Russia and not what Russians themselves define as their aims. In this war, Vladimir Putin listed three tasks at the outset: to demilitarize Ukraine, to denazify the country and to ensure it does not join NATO. The most important among them is, of course, ‘demilitarization’ which means crushing the Ukrainian armed forces. From this the other two follow necessarily. And destruction of the Ukrainian army is now a realistic expectation in the foreseeable future.

I have little doubt that this war will end, quite possibly in the coming six months, with a peace settlement that amounts to Ukrainian and Western capitulation to Russia’s demands. Winners take all!

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2024

P.S. – Tomorrow I leave for a one week winter vacation. I may come online during this period only if there are major developments in the war, otherwise we will be back in touch as from 16 January.

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2024/01/08/ ... raine-war/

******

The New York Times Just Discredited Ukraine’s State-Financed News Program

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 8, 2024

The first step to more effectively managing domestic perceptions and preemptively averting the myriad problems associated with their worsening is for Zelensky to finally start telling the truth about this conflict, ergo the purpose of the New York Time's latest piece if one recalls the current context and reads between the lines.

The Western narrative about the Ukrainian Conflict shifted last year after the counteroffensive failed. Nowadays barely a week goes by without another critical piece about that country or its leader from a mainstream outlet. The New York Times (NYT) continued this trend in their recent article titled “‘It’s State Propaganda’: Ukrainians Shun TV News as War Drags on”, which discredited its state-financed news program. Here’s some of the negative coverage that preceded their piece since late October:

* 31 October: “Time Magazine Shared Some ‘Politically Inconvenient’ Truths About Ukraine”

* 5 November: “The New York Times Wants Everyone To Know About The Growing Zelensky-Zaluzhny Rivalry”

* 14 November: “The Western Public Should Heed The Former NATO Supreme Commander’s Words About Ukraine”

* 26 November: “The EU Confirmed That Over Half A Million Ukrainian Men Fled To Escape Conscription”

* 29 November: “Politico Just Dumped On Zelensky”

* 4 December: “Kiev’s Mayor, The NATO Chief, & The US’ Top General All Debunked Zelensky’s Delusions”

* 9 December: “WaPo Amplified The Arguments Of Ukrainian Draft Dodgers Right As Zelensky Wants More Conscripts”

* 11 December: “The Financial Times Blew The Whistle On Zelensky’s Lies”

* 12 December: “Ukraine’s National Security Council Chief Just Changed His Tune About The Conflict”

* 14 December: “Western Policymakers Are Panicking Because There Was No Plan B If The Counteroffensive Failed”

* 17 December: “There’s A Whiff Of Mutiny In The New York Times’ Report About Ukraine’s Krynki Debacle”

* 18 December: “The Walls Are Closing In On Zelensky As Politico Demands A Government Of National Unity”

* 19 December: “The Financial Times Is Spinning Ukraine’s Defeat As A Victory To Justify Freezing The Conflict”

It’s within this context that the NYT informed their audience that the “Telemarathon” program’s viewership dropped from 40% in March 2022 to 10% today due to the audience realizing that it doesn’t tell the truth about this conflict. In particular, it failed to prepare Ukrainians for the prolonged fighting that ultimately unfolded, instead serving them never-ending fantasies about Russia’s alleged weakness. This in turn contributed to growing frustration and fatigue among the population.

The purpose behind their piece wasn’t to dump on him like Politico did at the end of November, but rather to complement the narrative reform proposals that were first popularized by the Financial Times early last month, both pieces of which can be read in the hyperlinked analyses above. Whereas the first was practically mocking Zelensky for fun, the second genuinely wanted to improve his country’s perception management capabilities by suggesting that it drop the propaganda in favor of realism.

The latter’s piece was published when preexisting domestic political tensions, which had remained stable for the first 18 months of the conflict, worsened after the failed counteroffensive and Zelensky’s unpopular conscription drive in the aftermath of that debacle for fortifying the entire front. Not only did Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny emerge as Zelensky’s top rival, but his former one Poroshenko returned to the spotlight after being accused of a Russian plot, while others like Kiev’s mayor Klitschko rose as well.

Zelensky’s reaction to this development was to preemptively discredit any future protests as supposedly being connected to the “Maidan 3” that he claimed Russia is orchestrating, but this inadvertently served to divide his security services, though they still remain the country’s predominant force. Nevertheless, this newfound pressure upon him became so difficult to manage that an expert from the influential Atlantic Council think tank told Politico last month that he should form a “government of national unity”.

He's yet to do so and likely won’t even consider this unless he feels that there’s literally no other choice, but the point in summarizing the events leading up to the NYT’s latest unsavory piece about Ukraine is to show how decisively domestic and international perceptions about him have shifted since late October. The first step to more effectively managing these on the home front at least is to finally start telling the truth about this conflict, ergo the purpose of the NYT’s latest piece if one reads between the lines.

Zelensky will probably never regain the popularity that he enjoyed at the opening stages of the special operation, but he can at the very least try to reconvert formerly active disillusioned supporters into being passive ones instead of actively or passively supporting his opponents. To that end, he must be more honest with his people, which entails completely reforming “Telemarathon’s” editorial line. The failure to do so will irredeemably doom his credibility in the eyes of a growing number of Ukrainians.

While this advice seems self-explanatory, it’s a lot easier to give than to implement, at least from Zelensky’s perspective. If state-financed news starts telling the truth about how badly things are going for their side along the front, then those pragmatic figures among their country’s Western patrons could pick up on that narrative shift and use it as proof of how futile it is to continue funding this conflict. If everything continues winding down, then the resumption of peace talks might soon follow.

He wants to delay this as long as possible because accepting any deal that leaves Ukrainian-claimed territory in Russian control would end his political career and ruin the legacy that he wants to build after it was revealed last summer that he rejected a much better deal in March 2022. He’s in a dilemma whereby admitting his country’s setbacks risks speeding up the resumption of those talks, while keeping up the charade risks worsening domestic distrust, which could pave the way for regime change.

Large-scale protests could be organized by his rivals, and this could serve as the pretext for Zaluzhny to attempt a military coup if the secret police don’t thwart either of these interconnected scenarios first. He can’t take their loyalty or capabilities for granted, however, hence why he might consider telling more of the truth. Regardless of whatever he does, those Westerners who read the NYT’s report now know that he was just full of hot air this whole time, which might make them sour on him even more.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-new- ... iscredited

Zelensky Demanded That Intelligence Agencies Censor The Media To Fight “Russian Disinformation”

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 8, 2024

They’re unlikely to comply with his demand since the Western narrative’s decisive shift in coverage of the Ukrainian Conflict, which is what he’s freaking out about so much nowadays, couldn’t have happened at the level of coordination that it did over the past few months without some involvement from that shadowy community.

Zelensky is clearly feeling the heat after the Western narrative about the Ukrainian Conflict decisively shifted in the aftermath of summer’s failed counteroffensive, which is why he just demanded that intelligence agencies censor the media to fight what he alleges is “Russian disinformation”. Here’s exactly what he said on Sunday at the Swedish “Society and Defense” conference according to his official website:

“Answering a question from the moderator, the President noted that global information policy would be crucial in the near future.

‘Today, unfortunately, Russia controls a large percentage of the information space. And I'm not talking about Ukraine here, but about social media everywhere in the civilized world: Europe, the United States, the UK, the African continent and Latin America. Russia invests a lot of money in various media in other countries, as well as in social networks,’ Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.

According to the President, the independent media of these countries pick up Russian narratives spread by propagandists and present them not as someone's opinion, but as reality. Therefore, the Head of State is convinced that one of the most difficult challenges today is to combat Russian disinformation in the world.

‘It is up to professionals, from intelligence to independent journalists, to monitor it and clean it up,’ the President said.”

Picking apart what he said, the first point that stands out is his admission that Russia has won more hearts and minds across the world than the West, including within his own country. His reference to its supposed “control of a large percentage of the information space” in Ukraine is likely an allusion to what he warned about in late November regarding its supposed plans to orchestrate a “Maidan 3”. In reality, however, he’s just trying to preemptively discredit any forthcoming protests organized by his rivals.

The next part to opine on concerns his conspicuous omission of Asia from what he described as “the civilized world”. Zelensky is likely enraged that heavyweights like China, India, Saudi Arabia, and Turkiye refused to sacrifice their objective national interests by emulating the West’s anti-Russian sanctions. No African or Latin American country has emulated them either, but Ukraine has lately attempted a diplomatic push in those parts of the world, hence why he didn’t want to smear them as “uncivilized”.

Moving along, Zelensky makes it seem like Russia has invested more money in its foreign soft power operations than anyone else, even though the truth is that the “US Agency for Global Media” received $840 million in funding last year while RT received just $288 million according to today’s exchange rate. The first fact is found on page 68 of the State Department’s Congressional Budget Justification report for 2023 while the second is from an anti-Russian website’s report that analyzed federal soft power funding.

The fourth point is that the Ukrainian leader conflates the multipolar worldview, which is this era’s zeitgeist, with so-called “Russian propaganda”. This is a common narrative tactic that’s done to discredit the ongoing global systemic transition even though it’s much more difficult to pull off nowadays after UN Secretary-General Guterres officially acknowledged this process last summer. Without intending to, Guterres extended credence to the observations of Russian-friendly experts, thus incensing Zelensky.

And finally, because the Global South and a growing number of folks within the West and even Ukraine are embracing the multipolar paradigm that Russia has championed despite the US investing much more in foreign soft power operations, Zelensky demanded that intelligence agencies censor the media. His patrons are already doing so to a great extent, however, and it’s actually with their blessing that the Western narrative on the Ukrainian Conflict has decisively shifted after summer’s failed counteroffensive.

He hasn’t yet realized that they’re souring on him even though an expert from the influential Atlantic Council think tank demanded in a piece for Politico last month that he form a “government of national unity” as soon as possible in order to effectively manage newly exacerbated domestic problems. The Western media’s attempts to spin any ceasefire as a victory for Ukraine and their subsequent promotion of peace talks with Russia are intended to send him the message that it’s time to compromise.

To add insult to injury, “The New York Times Just Discredited Ukraine’s State-Financed News Program” several days before Zelensky implied that anyone in the world who doesn’t support his messianic delusions of maximalist victory over Russia has been duped by that country’s propaganda. The reality is that his side is the one that’s spewing such propaganda that even one of his own patrons’ leading media outlets had to tell him to turn it down pronto if he wants to save what little credibility he has left.

With this in mind, his demand for intelligence agencies to censor the media won’t be complied with since the Western narrative’s decisive shift in coverage of the conflict couldn’t have happened at the level of coordination that it did without some involvement from that shadowy community. That’s not to say that they won’t crack down even more on the Alt-Media Community, but just that whatever they might do won’t change the latest trend among the Mainstream Media that he’s so concerned about.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/zelensky ... telligence

*******

Let's go to 1000
January 8, 18:08

Image

The number of published episodes of the use of the Lancets has reached 900!

According to updated statistics ( https://lostarmour.info/tags/lancet ) by colleagues from Lostarmour @lost_armour, by the evening of January 7, 2024, exactly 900 episodes of the use of Lancet kamikaze drones in the North-East Military District zone were published.

Of the 900 targets, 267 were destroyed, and another 489 targets were damaged. The results of the other 74 hits could not be accurately determined. Unfortunately, 68 videos recorded errors.

Half of all episodes of combat use of “Lancets” occur with various artillery. 224 towed guns and mortars, 201 self-propelled guns and 29 MLRS were hit. Other frequent targets: tanks and heavy special equipment (129 episodes), light armored vehicles (86 episodes), various radars (67 episodes) and air defense systems (52 episodes).

We remind you that only a part of the episodes of the use of the Lancets ends up online. The real battle score is much higher.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin/108884 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8881705.html

SMERSH is being restored in Russia
January 9, 14:06

Image

British intelligence claims that the process of recreating SMERSH is underway in Russia. According to the statement, “in Russia there is a restoration of the structure that was created under Stalin during the Great Patriotic War.”

In this regard, we can say that the restoration of SMERSH has already been delayed too much. I have been writing about the need to restore SMERSH since the spring of 2022.
Based on the results of its work, SMERSH was one of the most effective intelligence services in Russian history. The main thing is that the matter is not limited only to the name, but also to the restoration of approaches to working with external and internal enemies.

Image

Previously, a video appeared with one detained clown, where security forces with SMERSH stripes appeared.

No official statements have been made about the restoration of SMERSH in Russia.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8883095.html

Google Translator
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Wed Jan 10, 2024 12:41 pm

A war fought by the poor
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/10/2024

Image

Ukraine has been trying for several weeks to reach an agreement on the new mobilization law, with which the country seeks to replenish its ranks with around 500,000 recruits. The figure has also been a source of speculation for former officers who, like former Attorney General Lutsenko, have tried to use it to deduce the level of casualties in the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Lutsenko estimates that, if that figure is accurate for next year, irreversible casualties - people killed and seriously injured - would be around 30,000 per month. Regardless of the specific data, his assessment does seem correct that, when they become known, the losses of the Ukrainian army will be a shock to society. This will be especially so given the protection that the West has provided to Ukraine over the past two years in hiding the level of casualties.

In its attempt to favor Kiev, the international press has also accepted without question the official discourse according to which only Russia suffers massive casualties, while Ukraine protects its soldiers by putting their lives above the capture or maintenance of territories. Preserving the lives of soldiers is always the excuse to justify withdrawals, as has been seen on both sides of the front. In 2022, it was one of the reasons why Russia retreated from the right bank of the Dnieper, which it understood that it could not defend or would do so at the cost of losing thousands of lives of its most combat-ready troops. Zaluzhny used the same argument a few days ago to justify Marinka's withdrawal, although, yes, it occurred after a year of fighting and with the battle over and lost.

There have been no questions for either Zaluzhny or Zelensky about the number of casualties that this defense of a town that Ukraine has fought for since 2014 and which is now trying to convince us that “lacked strategic importance” has cost. This situation contrasts with the media's insistence on knowing and exaggerating Russian casualties. In collaboration with the digital media Mediazona , the British BBC , a publicly owned media from a country that theoretically is not directly participating in this war, daily inspects obituaries and messages on social networks to keep a daily count of Russian casualty figures. . Without any intention of carrying out similar work in the Ukrainian case, it is easy for kyiv to install in the collective consciousness the discourse of enormous Russian casualties and protection of soldiers' lives by Ukraine. Even so, it is not Moscow but kyiv that maintains a general mobilization, prohibits men of military age from leaving the country and seeks to urgently recruit half a million people.

The issue has reached levels of political controversy. What remains of the opposition, primarily Poroshenko's party and the virtually defunct and discredited Timoshenko, is trying to capitalize on the recruitment difficulties and the political struggle it has caused. And neither Zaluzhny nor Zelensky want to bear the responsibility of being the person who has demanded this recruitment, which will imply an increase in the population that can be mobilized. Although for the moment it is limited to men - neither of the two leaders wants to take responsibility for raising the idea of ​​including women in mandatory conscription either - it must be assumed that the new legislation will generously expand the level of disability with the that a person can be recruited to be sent to the front. The queues of Ukrainians trying to renew their passports at the consulates of the countries where they are refugees - or emigrants - to avoid the risk of not being able to access consular services in case of not responding to the arrival of a summons reminds that the Mandatory recruitment of men abroad is also one of the proposals.

In his New Year's speech, President Zelensky stated that one day every Ukrainian will have to ask himself who he is, “make the decision of who he wants to be. A victim or a winner. A refugee or a citizen.” Equating citizenship with going to the front to fight, the Ukrainian president encouraged Ukrainians to voluntarily return to a war in which Ukraine now finds itself on the defensive, suffering increasingly from Russian attacks and struggling to replenish its ranks. due to the wear and tear of two years of war and casualties that it refuses to admit.

The selection of personnel has also been an aspect that the Western press has exploited to criticize Russian troops. The mobilization of racial minorities, overrepresentation of peripheral and less developed regions and the apparent underrepresentation of the richest large cities has given rise to the argument that Moscow was sending the most disadvantaged sectors as cannon fodder to the front. Curiously, although compared to the standard of living in Russia, the regions of Donbass, especially Lugansk, would now be in that category (mainly due to the more than seven years of Ukrainian economic blockade and the impoverishment caused by the destruction and war economy), the media has overlooked the thousands of men and women there currently fighting with the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. The interest in hiding the fact that thousands of Ukrainian citizens are fighting against kyiv's troops is greater than the need to criticize Moscow for sending the most disadvantaged to the front line of the most dangerous front of this war.

In the same way that the press has treated the follow-up of Russian and Ukrainian casualties differently, this aspect has also been omitted. Like Russia, Ukraine released people it sent to the front in the first months of the Russian invasion and it is evident that the wealthiest sectors have been able to avoid recruitment by leaving the country legally or irregularly. Those who have not had the funds involved in paying for false certificates or transporting them across the Dniester River have had no choice but to respond to the army's call.

The complaint about the images of relatives of the political class enjoying their lives with total normality abroad had already bothered in the past - even in the years of the war in Donbass, for which the less favored sectors of the population were also recruited. society - but it has never been expressed so clearly as in an article published this week by The Conversation . In it, two experts in international relations and security, one of them a Ukrainian academic, clearly state something that should be obvious: the war is widening social inequalities. The elites, and even the urban middle classes, have managed to leave the country under favorable circumstances and will continue to be able to use their privileged position to stay away from war, while the lower classes will continue to find themselves defenseless against the possible sanctions that come with the war. attempt to avoid recruitment. With the middle classes outside the country, it has been the working classes - in addition to the most nationalist and radical sector of society - who have shouldered the responsibility of maintaining the war from the beginning. However, it has taken almost two years since the Russian invasion and approaching almost a decade since the beginning of the war for national and international experts to begin to worry about the fact that it is becoming increasingly clear that the war is being fought “for the poor.”

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/10/una-g ... os-pobres/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for January 9
January 9, 2024
Rybar

Image

On the fronts of the special operation, there were no significant changes in the front line over the past 24 hours. In the area of ​​the Tor ledge in the Liman direction, the Russian Armed Forces are developing an offensive towards Terny . Positional battles continue in the Sinkovka area in the Kupyansky sector .

In the Bakhmut direction, fighting is taking place on the heights near Kleshcheevka , as well as in Bogdanovka and on the approaches to Krasnoye : the main goal here is to break into the powerful defenses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, built over several years of fighting. In the Avdeevsky direction, the Russian Army is advancing in the Ocheretino area , where it was possible to expand the zone of control along the railway track.

A Ukrainian Armed Forces stronghold was taken southeast of Novomikhailovka in the Ugledar direction . The main battles are taking place in the area of ​​the cemetery, the Sintezprodservice enterprise and the machine and tractor factory, where the enemy has erected a network of fortified areas. According to some reports, the Russian Armed Forces have advanced into the forest belt several kilometers south of Novomikhailovka, but they have not yet been able to achieve confident control over the area.

On the possible use of rocket-propelled "Geraniums"
Several resources have reported that Russian troops have begun using the Shahed-238, a jet-powered version of the famous Shahed-136/Geran-2 UAV. The conclusion about this was made on the basis of photographs of debris allegedly found on the so-called. Ukraine after one of the last raids by the Russian Armed Forces.

The advantages of the Shahed-238 over its predecessor are obvious - due to the turbojet engine, a higher flight speed is achieved, making it difficult to intercept it using small arms and cannon weapons. The price is an increase in cost and a slightly shorter flight range.

Regardless of whether the new Iranian drone was used in recent Russian strikes or not, it is important to clearly understand one thing: neither the new Shahed nor other products of the Iranian (or Korean) military-industrial complex are wunderwaffes . It is quite illogical to believe that after their appearance the fighting will become more vigorous. But they can really provide a certain increase in the strike capabilities of the RF Armed Forces. Of course, with proper use with the allocation of sufficient forces and means to hit specific targets.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
In the North Ukrainian direction , Ukrainian formations attacked an oil depot in the city of Orel with two drones , the fire was extinguished, one fuel tank and a residential building were damaged, three people were injured. According to Mash, another UAV attacked the Oryolenergo building. In the Bryansk region, a Ukrainian drone was shot down on approach to the regional capital, without consequences. The Russian Armed Forces attacked enemy positions in the border areas of the Chernigov region in Klyusy , Zarechye , Gremyach and Ukrainsky .

Image
In the Slobozhansky direction, air defense systems intercepted three UAVs over the territory of the Kursk region . According to some reports, their target was Gurevich International Airport. Another drone was shot down in the sky over the city of Kurchatov . In addition, the Ukrainian Armed Forces shelled the village of Gornal : two residential buildings were damaged and a woman was killed. In the Belgorod region, the villages of Prilesye and Kozinka were shelled: there was no information about destruction. The Russian army worked on identified enemy positions in the Sumy region : Seredina - Buda , Rozhkovichi , Tolstodubovo , Muraveynya , Shalygino and Volkovka were under attack .


In the Liman direction the situation has not undergone significant changes. The Russian Armed Forces are striking enemy positions in the area of ​​the settlements of Yampolovka and Terny , using artillery and aviation. Positional battles continue in Serebryansky forestry .

Image
In the Bakhmut direction, battles continue to gain access to operational space with the goal of further liberating Chasy Yar : Russian troops managed to advance north of Kleshcheevka . The fighting is taking place in the direction of Bogdanovka , as well as Krasny, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces have taken up active defense near Khromovo . At the same time, the Russian Armed Forces inflict fire damage on enemy personnel and equipment in the Antonovka, Bogdanovka and Kleshcheevka areas.

Image
In the Avdeevsky direction , the RF Armed Forces, according to some data, have advanced slightly in the direction of Ocheretino and the area of ​​dachas near the treatment facilities near the Coke and Chemical Plant. A difficult situation remains in the area of ​​​​Stepovoy , where positional battles are taking place, and near Severny , from where Russian troops had to retreat from positions under fire in order to preserve personnel.

Image
In the Donetsk direction , after the liberation of Marinka, the advance towards Kurakhovo continues . Fighting is taking place on the outskirts of Georgievka , where the Russian Armed Forces managed to gain a foothold. Shelling by Ukrainian formations of the civilian infrastructure of the Donetsk People's Republic does not stop . Donetsk and the Yasinovatsky district were under fire : residential buildings were damaged, one person was injured. The greatest damage was caused to Gorlovka : a man was killed and a woman was injured, a gas station, a city hospital and other civilian infrastructure were damaged.

Image
In the Ugledar direction , heavy fighting for the village of Novomikhailovka continues : a stronghold of the Ukrainian formations, which covered the entrance to this settlement from the south-east side, was taken. To the south of the highway from Elenovka there is their firing point, which prevents the Russian Armed Forces from introducing reserves. There are also enemy positions in the area of ​​the cemetery, the Sintezprodservice enterprise and the machine and tractor factory, and enemy surveillance equipment operates in the center of the village. There have been reports of advances in the forest belt south of Novomikhailovka, however, neither side has confident control over it. Several strongholds of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are occupied in the direction of Pobeda , however, in general, the pace of advance of the Russian Armed Forces in this area decreased after the arrival of enemy reserves. There are no significant changes on the line of combat contact south of Vugledar .

Image
In the Zaporozhye direction there are oncoming battles at Rabotino and Verbovoy . According to some reports, Ukrainian formations counterattacked on the northern approaches to Novoprokopovka , managing to regain lost positions. The Russian Armed Forces inflicted fire on enemy concentrations in Rabotino . At the same time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fired at the city of Tokmak using MLRS : the air defense systems were activated, the details of the shelling are unknown.

Image
In the Kherson direction, the situation has not undergone significant changes: shooting battles are taking place on the islands, and in Krynki the sides are conducting positional combat operations, actively using attack drones. An attempt by the Russian Armed Forces to gain a foothold in the center of the village was noted, but the advancing armored personnel carrier was hit. On the right bank of the Dnieper, the Russian Armed Forces are methodically destroying enemy manpower and equipment: this is how FPV drone crews struck a Ukrainian Armed Forces transport in the Tyaginka area . Meanwhile, Ukrainian formations continue to shell settlements on the left bank of the Kherson region. Over the past time, Sagi , Aleshki , Krynki, Dnepryany , Korsunka and Podstepnoe have come under attack : no information about casualties has been received.

Political events
About the statements of the Swedish Prime Minister

Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson spoke at the national conference “People and Defense” regarding the emerging geopolitical situation in the region and around Ukraine.

From the main statements:

Sweden continues to support Ukraine, while at the same time Sweden’s place is in NATO. A ground contingent will be sent to Latvia to “contain” Russia. Expenditures on GDP are growing, so Sweden must take into account the experience of the war in Ukraine for the effective construction of not only the army, but also other structures.

About the arson of relay cabinets in the Kyiv region


Interesting news came from the Kiev region : there, local “law enforcement” officers arrested three minor teenagers and one 19-year-old young man for setting fire to electrical cabinets on the railway. In total, the detainees managed to disable four complexes of automatic relay devices in the Boryspil area . In their own words, they received tasks through Telegram . Sounds familiar, doesn't it?

Contrary to some prevailing beliefs, the distribution of such orders for activities in the rear areas of the so-called. Ukraine is far from a new matter. It’s just that previously this was associated with specific objective difficulties, and in some places the results of the actions simply did not appear on the Internet.

But as the socio-economic situation in Ukrainian territories worsens and total mobilization develops, protest sentiments will grow among the local population. And in comparison with the previous stages of the war, it will become increasingly easier to transfer them into such activity. Which, of course, can and should be used.

On military assistance for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Prime Minister of Spain José Manuel Albarez announced the transfer of two ambulance armored vehicles based on the BMR-600 armored personnel carrier for the evacuation of killed and wounded members of Ukrainian forces.

Sweden allocates 50 million Swedish kronor (about 5 million US dollars) to the NATO defense fund, which deals with procurement for the so-called. Ukraine. The money will be used to purchase fuel, medicine, mine clearance equipment and other areas that lack funding.

The Czech company Isolit-Bravo is said to have donated ground-based UGV Trail-Blazer drones to the Ukrainian military .

They will be used to perform logistical tasks and evacuate the wounded. It is additionally noted that these are direct deliveries directly to units on the front line to avoid delays and paperwork. At the moment, the Czech side has handed over eight such products, and four more are being prepared for shipment.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... anvarya-2/

Google Translator

*******

The Sky Is Falling!

Ben Hodges stopped smoking whatever the shit he smoked before and he looked reality in the face. Finally.

Brüssel. „Das Albtraumszenario der Ukraine wird gerade Realität“, sagt Ben Hodges, ehemaliger Oberbefehlshaber der US-Armee in Europa. „Die Ukraine hat fast keine Munition mehr, und Europa und die USA sind nicht gewillt, ihre Munitionsproduktion auf ein neues Level zu heben“, so der US-General a. D. im Gespräch mit dem RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland (RND). Während Russland seine Angriffe aus der Luft und zu Lande massiv ausweitet, geht den ukrainischen Soldaten an der Front gerade die Munition aus. Raketen für die Luftabwehr sind knapp und Artilleriegeschosse werden rationiert, sodass die ukrainischen Truppen geplante Angriffe absagen und Verteidigungsstellungen kaum noch halten können. Nach Angaben des ukrainischen Militärs mussten einige Einheiten ihre Feuerrate im Vergleich zum Sommer bereits um 90 Prozent reduzieren. Es fehlt an allem – und an vielen Stellen der Front wissen die Kommandeure nicht, wie lange sie ihre Stellungen noch halten können.

Translation: Brussels. “Ukraine’s nightmare scenario is becoming a reality,” said Ben Hodges, former commander of the US Army in Europe. “Ukraine has almost run out of ammunition, and Europe and the USA are not willing to take their ammunition production to a new level,” said the retired US general. D. in conversation with the Editorial Network Germany (RND). While Russia is massively expanding its attacks from the air and on land, the Ukrainian soldiers on the front are running out of ammunition. Anti-aircraft missiles are in short supply and artillery shells are being rationed, leaving Ukrainian troops unable to cancel planned attacks and hold defensive positions. According to the Ukrainian military, some units have already had to reduce their rate of fire by 90 percent compared to the summer. Everything is missing - and in many places on the front the commanders don't know how long they can hold their positions.

The problem, of course, for such people as Ben Hodges, Petraeus, Keane and likes, is that you cannot spew propaganda BS for 22 months, referencing the tired Gulf Wars and predicting the collapse of Russia, and then on the 23rd month say--nah, we just BSed you, we knew the deal all along. Nope, doesn't work like this--firstly, they never knew the deal and secondly, they have no professional reputation left. Well, maybe for CNN military "expert" positions, but as I get tired quoting my friend Colonel Vladimir Trukhan: "They cannot out-think us." Well, facts on the ground as well as strategic reality speak volumes. And even Ben Hodges have to look the truth in the eye.

Meanwhile, an interesting rumor I heard--VSU continue to send scores of 404 cannon fodder to Krynki, on the left bank of Dnepr, is because they simply cannot stop doing this, because the picture there is from horror movies and they cannot allow Russians to start collecting bodies--literally, every square meter is covered in bodies and body parts. As is true pretty much along the whole frontline which slowly moves to the West. But now this:

Image

Make no mistake, sewers get overwhelmed sometimes everywhere, but in Kiev--here is the largest spill of shit, well, in Europe. More are happening and check out what happened with Kiev metro--yes, it is sinking or, rather, flooding. There is an upside though for this lake of shit--Russians WILL 100% avoid this street when entering Kiev, so, tactically, it makes total sense to organize a battalion Command Post of VSU there. The new slogan in Russia today: Shoigu, Gerasimov, please, bomb Kiev with yeast. Yak, disgusting--I love it;) Talk about shit hitting streets, big time.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2024/01 ... lling.html

A song for Kiev: https://youtu.be/svPDzNO6GQk

*******

Mobilization limits
January 9, 17:33

Image

Many of the problems with mobilization in Ukraine (besides the simple depletion of the volunteer resource) lie in the fact that about 19,000,000 of the population now remain under the control of Kyiv. Up to 10,000,000, taking into account new regions and refugees, have set sail for the Russian Federation, and up to 10,000,000 are hiding from Zelensky in Europe and the CIS countries.

At the same time, the average age of those forcibly mobilized in Ukraine increased from 47 years in September to 50 years in December 2023. And this trend will obviously grow, which is why they are preparing to rake in women (today it was announced that 50,000 sets of women’s uniforms have been purchased) + disabled people of the 3rd group, students and “disabled” workers from enterprises. Dancing around the new draconian law on mobilization is already a story about shifting responsibility for further dumping of corpses, which will lead to further depopulation of Ukraine.

The whole banquet has long been sitting on the financial needle of the West. At a minimum, this whole farce costs the United States and NATO $5,000,000,000 in direct investments per month, not counting targeted defense packages. At the same time, the United States is clearly determined to shift the main financing of the Nazi project in Ukraine to its European vassals.

It would be an illusion to think that the war will end and the West will completely write off the Ukrainian Nazis.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8883693.html

Google Translator

******

KYLE ANZALONE: UKRAINIANS TURN AGAINST WAR BUT ARE AFRAID TO SPEAK OUT
JANUARY 9, 2024

By Kyle Anzalone, Libertarian Institute, 1/2/24

As the war in Ukraine nears the end of its second year, Ukrainians are turning against fighting and towards diplomacy. One former official said that Ukrainian soldiers are currently fighting and dying for nothing.

The Times reports, “Many Ukrainians are growing tired and weary of the war. One Ukrainian military source admitted that average Ukrainians were talking of a truce yet there were questions around what the price of the truce would be.”

Most people in Ukraine wanted a truce but were “afraid to admit it to themselves,” Mykhailo Chaplyha, a political commentator and former vice-ombudsman of Ukraine, said. There was an atmosphere of “total mistrust and fear” in Ukraine and anyone who dared to think of a truce would immediately become an “outcast and a traitor.”

After Russia invaded Ukraine, President Zelensky targeted dissidents using the security state. The Ukrainian media and Zelensky’s main political opposition has been outlawed. Kiev has targeted branches of the Orthodox church perceived to be too close to Moscow.

A former Ukrainian official said that Zelensky was losing support. He said the West told Kiev not to give up, but there was no war strategy and soldiers were “sent to the front line to die.” The official continued, “It is nonsense to send in our soldiers to die if we don’t have enough armament and resources to win militarily. What is the strategy, to keep us dying for what? And not less important — where is our diplomacy?”

In the early months of the war in Ukraine, the West pushed Kiev to abandon talks with Moscow. The US and its allies promised Ukraine that it would provide Kiev with all the support it needs to win the war.

However, as the war nears its third year, the Western weapons stockpiles are approaching depletion. The White House has run out of funds for arming Ukraine, while future aid is being used as leverage in an immigration debate.

Since October 7, the Biden administration has started to prioritize arming Israel over Ukraine. Israel has received tens of thousands of 155 mm shells, a high-demand weapon for both Kiev and Tel Aviv.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2024/01/kyl ... speak-out/

******

SITREP 1/9/24: Latest Leading-edge Tech-war Updates

ImageSIMPLICIUS THE THINKER
JAN 9, 2024

<snip>

Let’s start with the interesting ‘leaked’ image claimed to be from the Ukrainian “Virage-Planshet” system I’ve highlighted before. Planshet just means “tablet”, by the way. It has generated a lot of commentary given that it appears to imply that Ukraine has total surveillance of every Russian aircraft in the entire SMO—which should, technically speaking, not be possible:

Image

The ‘legend’ is roughly: the purple circles are airports with main runway orientations shown by a white line. The plane icons I believe can mostly be anything: planes, missiles, helicopters, and drones. Red are Russian, blue are Ukrainian which is why their call-numbers are censored out. We see about three Ukrainian craft or so near the Dnieper and a few in the west of Ukraine, many of which are likely helicopters.

No one knows how accurate this is, and the fact it was ‘deliberately’ leaked could imply a psyop meant for the very purpose of making Russia ‘worried’ by suggesting Ukraine can see more assets than they actually can. Furthermore, the assets seen at the farthest end, for instance in the Russian Rostov region, could be markers of known or guessed at ‘last locations’, etc. It’s difficult to know for absolute certain.

But in general: there is no real way that Ukraine should possess the ability to track Russian flights in real time that far away. There is no known satellite capability exactly that can do this for reasons we’ve discussed before: optical (EO) satellites are not geostationary and can only take a few pictures per hour. And sats that are geostationary and can “hover above” a location, in a sense, are in extremely distant orbit and are not EO because at that range they cannot see or detect anything with great acuity; they are usually communications satellites of various sorts. SARs (Synthetic Aperture Radar) sats on the other hand can’t really even track moving targets which appear as a blur to them.

This leaves the only possibility as some kind of ground HUMINT, which seems implausible for realtime tracking of dozens of jets apart from merely their take-off/landing—which we do know is done. And OTH (Over the Horizon) radars which is a rabbit hole ridden with complexity and problems of its own, particularly that I do not believe there are any true functioning OTH radars left in Europe.

Whatever the case may be, if the image is real it goes to show the levels of NATO-assisted sophistication that Ukraine is working with—a pretty startling level of ISR.

We’ve seen their Virage images below, but only in more isolated and localized areas, like missile attacks coming from Crimea:

Image

This is easier to explain as at least radars in the Odessa region can theoretically track that far, given the right altitude of the object.

One thing the new Virage image appears to reveal is that Russia does have good patrolling flights over the Black Sea west of Crimea. This appears to confirm recent reports that Mig-31s shot down a Neptune missile barrage at an impressively long range, 40-80km from the shore. That means Mig-31s, with their famously powerful radars, as well as potentially A-50 AWACs are infact patrolling the sea in that region.

I’m referring to the flights seen here:

Image

<snip>

The attacks over the past few days were noted for their saturation ferocity and some reports claimed that Russia’s upgraded Pantsir-SM systems may have been used in the Belgorod region to down an entire barrage of Czech Vampire MLRS rockets. (Video at link.)

Literature has shown Russia’s latest Pantsir upgrades have much better radars, more resistant to noise and clutter, more tuned to detect smaller drones, etc. In short: the past week has seen exemplary work where Russian AD has stopped every single barrage of vaunted UA weaponry, but you won’t hear that from Zelensky’s press.

In fact what we did hear from his side is Ukraine’s own AD has been badly depleted. The US is scrambling to find more Patriot missiles and Russia’s latest attack days ago was the first that Ukrainian officials actually began to admit how few of the missiles they shot down:

Image

The 18/24 Kh-101s is of course also fake ‘information war’ cope, but it is highly noteworthy that they’ve finally admitted downing 0 Kinzhals and Iskanders—strangely only days after claiming a 10/10 shootdown rate on Kinzhals.

Many videos showed direct hits that even Kiev could not hide: (Video at link.)

And evidence continues to pour out about large enterprises destroyed:

Image

Huge queues of ambulances were near the surgical department of the military hospital of the Western region (Lviv) after yesterday's missile strikes. A Ukrainian journalist writes about several dozen vehicles bringing the wounded. In Lvov, after the recent strike, the Russian Armed Forces flew somewhere very well. Local reports report dozens of ambulances transporting the wounded. Since Zelensky’s gang is officially silent about this, the dead and wounded are clearly not civilians.

Russia is causing massive damage to Ukrainian defense enterprises which includes the personnel.

The report from the Kiev Artem plant states the “entire shift” of 50 people was wiped out by two Kinzhals:

Image

Alleged insider info about Russian Kinzhal strike on Kiev military enterprises: "THE DEATH TOLL AT THE ARTEM PLANT IS 50. That's the entire shift that day. Two Daggers went into the shop. The only lucky ones were those who were late for work because the metro stopped along with the electricity, and those who were loitering around. Ukrainian propaganda concealed this episode, although all Lukyanivka, Tatarka and Syrets saw it from their windows (photo). But the propaganda told that all 10 Kinzhals were shot down by a massive attack, throwing pickle jars at the enemy. (c) Maxim Ravreba PS. Below is a post with a link to a relative of one of the dead workers where she complains that Zelensky's gang is hiding information about those killed in the strike. Her nephew died there."

Obituaries have rolled out, including one of a mother and daughter who reportedly both worked at the Luch Bureau. These are civilians but unfortunately are effectively deemed enemy combatants because they are working in military assembly plants, which are legal targets.

Ukrainian ex-general Krivonos says some of Ukraine’s most significant enterprises have been totally destroyed: (Video at link.)

Following Russian missile strikes, Ukraine lost enterprises that produced the most powerful missiles in the country - former head of Ukrainian Special Forces, General Krivonos. Our government is leaking data about these enterprises, which produced powerful weapons - the general says. No one is responsible for the damage this causes, Krivonos complains. "Kiev officials think only about winning elections, and not about how to win the war."

In conclusion: Russia’s winter strike campaign has started very powerfully on Ukraine’s defense infrastructure and has likely incapacitated a huge amount of irreplaceable skilled labor that was critical for producing their drones and home-brewed missiles—which are some of the last things Ukraine can really still produce internally.

An uncorroborated report from a Polish paper also claimed the following:

Image

Russian analyst Starshe Edda has the following calculations for American Patriot stock:

The most interesting issue in this regard is the production of missiles. According to plans for the last decade, by 2026 the United States was supposed to launch 600 + missiles for the Patriot PAC-3 MSE air defense systems per year. Now, according to available data, this figure is about 500 missiles annually.

Is it a lot or a little? In the air defense of Kiev, as far as one can judge, now up to five batteries « Patriot », that is, up to forty launchers. 40 launchers, if all of them relate to the modification of PAC-3, can accommodate up to 640 ( up to 16 missiles for installation in four containers of four ). In fact, they are smaller, at least part of the batteries of the older PAC-2 modification, for which missiles are no longer manufactured. For them, work is underway to maintain the existing ammunition in readiness.

But in any case, we see that the named figures of the annual production – is the value of one full salvo maximum. This is not so small if you take the life of ( guaranteed missiles and two extended ) for 30 years, then during this time you can accumulate at this rate one and a half thousand ZUR. But this is good for peacetime, but in conditions,when one more or less large raid may require Patriot’s consumption from hundreds of missiles and higher, excluding other means, 500-600 per year becomes clearly insufficient. Especially considering that – users are by no means only Ukraine, and not everyone is ready to do their contracts in the interests of Kiev.

What in the end? We heard NATO rhetoric about air defense supplies. How quickly it will be translated into reality, I suspect they do not know either in the Pentagon or in Brussels. Surely they know in Bethesda, Maryland (head office « Lockheed-Martin »), but they are unlikely to tell anyone.


<snip>

As if that wasn’t bad enough, we had a major revelation from Ukrainian soldiers that the reason none of their Abrams are on the front is because they don’t work. Recall the recent reports of the highly sensitive Abrams, which need their filters changed every hour. But they took it a step further and actually showed a damning video of their Abrams gun all janky, its stabilizers completely shot. At the 0:30 second mark you can see the gun shakin’-n’rattlin’: (Video at link.)

The American magazine “Forbes” recently looked for tanks that the United States transferred to Ukraine and could not find. Dear journalists of Forbes magazine, next time you ask us. We'll tell you everything. First, look at exactly which tanks were handed over - a very outdated model (early 1990s), incomplete and in unclear technical condition. And yes, the tanks really arrived in Ukraine, but they have not yet reached the front line due to some technical problems. As proof, we provide a video of the M1A1 “Abrams ” tank with a Ukrainian crew that has already broken the gun. We have friends in the Armed Forces of Ukraine who help us receive not only videos. They were dumbfounded by the state of the vaunted American technology.

Color me shocked. NATO weapons have really lived up to ‘expectations’.

As if that wasn’t bad enough, Germany hit out with its own bombshell that mysterious “drones” have been flying over the country for a year, spying on their bases—and the kicker: Germany apparently is not able to do anything about it! None of the newfangled NATO weaponry, the high tech sensors, etc., can repel the drones at all. From Bild:

Image

Image

Seems NATO EW tech is likewise in need of upgrade. The news just keeps getting worse for the failing West.

(Much other good stuff at link so go look.)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/sit ... -edge-tech
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Thu Jan 11, 2024 1:44 pm

Epic of failed offensives
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/11/2024

Image

Reality and desires mix in official discourses in each military conflict. Maintaining hope for victory is an essential condition for raising the morale of the troops and the civilian population, which does not always have access to independent sources of information. In the case of the Ukrainian war, in which the media front has gained great importance on the international scene, we must also include fiction and theatricalization, which is produced even by authorities and media outlets in countries that are theoretically not belligerents. In this way, choosing naivety and willful blindness, Ukraine has managed to place in the world press obviously false stories such as the ghost of Kiev , or turn into legend those that were denied by the facts, but that continue to be used to create a halo of epic, unity and invincibility beyond all logical reasoning. This is the case of the garrison of Snake Island, which according to Volodymyr Zelensky's speech chose nationalist martyrdom instead of surrender and, with bad words, rejected the Russian offer to save their lives and hand over the territory. Unlike the ghost of Kiev , a creation of the Zelensky factory, the events occurred and, to create the legend, it is only necessary to omit the end: the sailors surrendered, were captured by Russian troops, transferred to Crimea and, months later, delivered in an exchange as prisoners of war.

The problem with the epic is twofold. On the one hand, it is likely to give rise to surprises when the war is over and the population is aware of the personal and material cost of victory, defeat or eternal struggle until the parties to stop fighting. On the other hand, there is a risk of believing oneself invincible and acting in a careless, excessively optimistic or even irresponsible manner. The fear of falling into one of those categories seems to have been the reason why the political authorities - the national and especially the international ones, with greater decision-making capacity than those in Kiev - chose not to follow the plan that, according to the journalist Yaroslav Trofimov had proposed Zaluzhny. Ukraine had managed to paralyze the Russian offensive in 2022 and was aware that the imbalance of troops favored it in the context of a front whose extension exceeded a thousand kilometers.

The Ukrainian military leader's plan, to which the American press already dedicated heroic covers, then proposed a major ground offensive to break the Zaporozhie front. That is, Zaluzhny proposed doing in 2022 what Ukraine decided to do in 2023. Russia was in a moment of weakness, it had not yet carried out the partial mobilization decreed in September and, as could be seen in Kharkov and Kherson, its combat capacity was seriously limited. But as the Ukrainian attempt to extend its Kharkiv offensive north of Luhansk also demonstrated, exhaustion was not only present among the Russian troops. At that time, Ukraine and its allies considered the offensive proposed by Zaluzhny to be excessively risky, which according to Trofimov had only required minimal weapons to carry out the operation. Failure, they then argued, taking it for granted, would have caused a Russian counteroffensive with the capacity to become a strategic defeat.

Ukraine, the United States and other allies thus opted for a ground operation in the same place proposed by Zaluzhny, but which would be carried out with the planning and weapons necessary to achieve victory. As Antony Blinken stated in June, Ukraine then had “everything it needs” to defeat Russia on the front. He stated it with the confidence of someone who blindly trusts in his army - in this case in his proxy army - and does not listen to reason. Unlike a few months earlier, when the authorities had correctly assessed the tremendous risk involved in the Zaporozhie operation, in 2023 they opted for the route to Melitopol despite being aware that Russian superiority in several important aspects, especially artillery , although also the ability to mine fields and aviation, could lead to an even worse result than in the hypothetical Zaluzhny offensive in 2022.

For months, Russian war correspondents chronicled, practically in real time, Russian preparation for the coming offensive. After the defeat of Kharkiv, Russia had gone, as Ukraine has now done, to a defensive phase in which the only thing that mattered was maintaining the territory. Journalists wrote in their chronicles how soldiers dug trenches, the rearguard tried to equip, arm and integrate recruited soldiers, and solutions were sought to compensate for the delay that had become evident in the development and use of surveillance and attack drones. The appearance of the Iranian Shahed should have been the first indication that Russia had understood this lack and was working to solve it. However, Zelensky and his associates chose to see this as a symptom of weakness that demonstrated Ukraine's superiority: kyiv had access to Western weapons, while Russia, the second largest army in the world, sought urgent help in Tehran. Nor did the certainty that Moscow was developing new models in its factories and that it was working on the basis of what had failed in its first offensive worry the West, which continued to act with the arrogance of someone who prefers to believe their own propaganda, even at the cost of the lives of the soldiers who fight in their name. With continuous, real-time surveillance, Kiev, Washington or London cannot be given the benefit of the doubt: all of them were aware that Russia had been preparing its defense for months and that the rapid breakdown of the Zaporozhye front required a massive collapse of the Russian army which, even so, would have been protected by the dense minefields that they should have also foreseen.

“Planners of the Ukrainian counteroffensive against the country's Russian invaders imagined last year that elite forces, like the unit led by Captain Anatoliy Jarchenko, would sweep in to deliver the final blow to a D-Day-style triumph,” he wrote. yesterday The Wall Street Journal in an article that seeks to praise the epic of the Ukrainian soldiers, but also highlight the failure of planning the operation. The objective is the usual one, to justify the continuation of the flow of weapons to keep active a war that in recent days is becoming even more dangerous for Ukrainian soldiers. Yesterday, an article published by ABC News quoted a Dnipropetrovsk doctor reporting a 30% increase in serious injuries at one of the city's main trauma hospitals. Ukraine's failure is not measured only in lack of progress, but also in casualties that, perhaps, could have been avoided by starting from a real, not fictitious, image of the reality on the ground and accepting the mistake of having underestimated Russia at the time. in which it was consummated, not six months later.

“By the time the paratroopers of Jarchenko's company entered the battle on a moonless night in August, the counteroffensive had already turned into failure and his men were about to learn the deadly reasons why it had happened,” the story continues. from The Wall Street Journal focused on the failed Verbovo assault. The objective, the report states, “to storm a hill near the village of Verbovo, was modest. But things would go fatally wrong in a matter of minutes.” The unit, he explains, had received a promise that Russian drones would be shot down by Ukrainian electronic warfare systems. To his surprise, the drones not only were not shot down but blew up the forest around the small unit. The failure of the large armored columns had already forced Ukraine to rule out this means of breaking through the front to try to achieve the same objective with units that are more difficult to detect. The result was the same. “The unit was incapacitated. “More than half of the 20 or so soldiers were killed or seriously wounded within minutes, including the doctor,” continues The Wall Street Journal , which continues to narrate a World War I-style trench hell that was perfectly foreseeable, but that neither Ukraine nor its partners wanted to see. It was easier to blindly trust the epic of victory and legend than to study the facts.

“The Ukrainian assault ended before it could begin,” says The Wall Street Journal in a statement that could extend to the six months of the ground offensive. Of course, neither the casualties nor the fear of making the same mistake again seem to be enough to dissuade Ukraine and its Western partners from trying again. This time, the miracle weapons will not be the Leopard, but the F16.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/11/epica ... -fallidas/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for January 10
January 11, 2024
Rybar

Image

At the front, the hottest spot is still Novomikhailovka in the Ugledar direction . Although certain problems remain with the assault on the village itself, the Russian Armed Forces decided to bypass the flank and advanced deep into the enemy’s defense in an area up to 4 kilometers wide and to a depth of up to seven hundred meters in the area of ​​the Solenenkaya gully. This will make it possible to shoot through the Konstantinovka - Novomikhailovka road section .

In the Bakhmut direction, units of the Russian Airborne Forces finally cleared the cemetery south of Bogdanovka from the enemy . In the Avdeevsky direction, the Russian Army is fighting heavy battles in the area of ​​​​the Stepovo and Avdeevsky coke plants : the situation has not changed.

In the Orekhovsky sector, the Russian Armed Forces are conducting sorties in small groups in light armored vehicles at the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces west of Rabotino . The enemy is trying to regain lost positions west of Verbovoy . In the Kherson direction , the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue the operation to hold the bridgehead in Krynki at any cost, despite the high losses of personnel and watercraft.

The Russian Armed Forces carried out strikes on targets in Kharkov , Mirnograd , Nikopol , Dnepropetrovsk and Krivoy Rog : in the latter, after the strikes, a critical situation with energy supply developed. The Ukrainian Armed Forces, in turn, tried to attack targets behind Russian lines with an aircraft-type drone. Air defense crews Air defense crews shot down a UAV on approach to Engels : most likely, the target was the airfield of the same name.

The situation on the front line and combat operations
The enemy once again used drones to attack targets in the rear regions of Russia. Tonight, air defense crews shot down an aircraft-type UAV on approach to Engels . Ukrainian media report two drones. Obviously, the target was a military airfield where strategic bombers of the Russian Aerospace Forces are located. This time the enemy failed to achieve the goal.

Image
In the North Ukrainian direction, the enemy again fired at the border area of ​​the Bryansk region. In the village of Lemeshovka, Sevsky district, authorities reported 14 arrivals. Several residential buildings, an administrative building and an industrial facility were damaged. In the village of Azarovka, Starodub district, one house was damaged, but there were no casualties. The RF Armed Forces, in turn, worked on various targets in the border zone of the Chernigov and Sumy regions: targets were hit in Karpovichi , Gremyach , Znob-Trubchevskaya , Methodovka, Sorokino, Seredina-Buda, Demyanovka, Bachevsk, Marchikhina Buda and Boyaro-Lezhachi .

Image
In the Slobozhansky direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fired at the border village of Terebreno and the village of Prilesye in the Belgorod region : there were power outages. The Russian Armed Forces responded with strikes against the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the border area of ​​the Sumy and Kharkov regions.

In addition, footage appeared that was filmed south of the village of Golyshevskoye , not far from the village of Tyotkino - the same one that constantly appears in military reports and shelling by Ukrainian forces. Such publications are important for the Russian audience: first of all, for understanding the ongoing processes and the fact that serious combat work is going on in the border areas on a daily basis.

Image
Positional battles are taking place in the Kupyansk direction ; no significant changes have occurred on the front line. The sides exchange artillery strikes and from time to time attack and counterattack in small groups without much success. In the area of ​​​​Kupyansk itself , a Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance group was discovered and eliminated by artillery fire. In addition, the Russian Armed Forces carried out a number of airstrikes against concentrations of enemy forces at rear targets in the area.

Image
In the Liman direction, positional battles are taking place in the area of ​​the Torsky salient and west of Chervona Dibrova . According to some reports, Ukrainian formations tried to carry out a series of local counterattacks in order to recapture previously lost positions. but they were not successful.

Image
There are no significant changes in the Bakhmut direction . Attempts by Russian troops to improve tactical positions in the direction of Andreevka and Kleshcheevka continue . In addition, the Russian Armed Forces continue to clear the heights adjacent to Bogdanovka , where they managed to finally break the resistance of Ukrainian formations at the local cemetery and push the enemy back towards Chasy Yar .

Image
In the Avdeevsky direction, fierce fighting continues in the area of ​​the Stepovo and coke plant, as well as on the approaches to Novokalinovo . In particular, footage was published of the work of the Russian Aerospace Forces, which carried out attacks with guided bombs on defensive positions and ammunition depots of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Image
In the Donetsk direction, west of Maryinka , Russian units continue offensive operations in the Georgievka area , where, according to some reports, advanced units were able to advance deeper into residential areas, expanding the zone of control in the village. In addition, Russian artillery was closely targeting positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the Kurakhovo region , where a large Ukrainian logistics center is located. At the same time, the enemy does not stop shelling the civilian infrastructure of the Donetsk People's Republic . Thus, in the Kirovsky district of Donetsk, one woman was injured as a result of the dropping of ammunition from a UUV. Later, local authorities reported the death of one civilian as a result of a rocket attack by the Armed Forces of Ukraine on a residential area in the Kalininsky district of Gorlovka .

Image
In the Ugledar direction, battles for Novomikhailovka continue . After it was not possible to take the populated area in a swoop, units of the Russian Armed Forces launched a flank attack to the south of the populated area and managed to advance deep into the enemy’s defenses in an area up to 4 kilometers wide and to a depth of up to seven hundred meters in the area of ​​the Solenenkaya gully . This allows you to increase the springboard for future offensive actions and expands operational capabilities. However, in the populated area itself, the situation remains difficult: it has not yet been possible to knock out the enemy from powerful fortified areas to the east and south due to the active use of FPV drones and artillery by the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Image
In the Zaporozhye direction, units of the Russian Armed Forces successfully repelled an enemy attack on the approaches to Verbovoy . It was reported that the enemy again used the tactic of advancing in small groups, which were subsequently destroyed. At the same time, Russian air assault groups continued to "wear down" the enemy west of Rabotino , attacking strong points with small numbers of personnel and equipment, preventing further attempts to advance by Ukrainian formations. In addition, the Russian Armed Forces actively conducted counter-battery warfare.

Image

Such sidecars were widely used during World War II.

The Ukrainian army is said to lose about 30,000 men per month:

The Ukrainian government has not released official figures for the total number of soldiers who have been killed or wounded since Russia launched its full-scale invasion nearly two years ago.
However, anecdotal evidence of mounting Ukrainian casualties in the war was reinforced by claims made on Ukrainian television this weekend by the country's former prosecutor general.

Yuriy Lutsenko claimed that around 30,000 Ukrainian troops are now being killed or badly wounded per month and that the total casualty toll for wounded and killed in the war is around 500,000.


Those are 1,000 per day. That is more than the Russian Ministry of Defense claims in its daily reports. The average therein is about 600 to 700 per day listed as Ukrainian dead or heavily wounded. Left out of the reports are those killed or wounded unobserved due to far range missile strikes.

The high losses are the reason why the Ukrainian government wants to, over the next year, mobilizes another 500,000 men and women. That are about 41,000 per months. But the new mobilization law the government presented to the parliament was full of unconstitutional clauses (in Russian) and will have to be heavily modified. The mobilization efforts are unlikely to be successful.

December and January have seen three large scale Russian missile attacks aimed at Ukrainian weapon production sides. The attacks have exhausted the Ukrainian air defenses (machine translation):

The Ukrainian Air Force confirmed that the Ukrainian Armed Forces do have a shortage of anti-aircraft guided missiles.
This was stated by Air Force spokesman Yuri Ignat, commenting on The New York Times article that the United States will soon not be able to supply Ukraine with Patriot missiles.

"It is clear that there is a shortage of anti-aircraft guided missiles, and no one is hiding it. That is why there are such concerns in the Western press. I think that our Western partners are well informed about the state of affairs with our air defense systems," Yuri Ignat said on the telethon.

He said that the Ukrainian Armed Forces spent a lot of missiles to repel the last three massive Russian attacks on December 29, January 2 and January 8.


There will be more large scale missile attacks and there will only be few new anti-air missiles to replace the fired ones.

On the front line the Russian practice what they deem an 'active defense'. Local attacks, while small, are used to take up better positions.

The toll on the Ukrainians is high:

“Morale is all right,” said the deputy battalion commander, who uses the call sign Shira, standing nearby to see the men off. “But physically we are exhausted.”
...
The men of the 117th Brigade, who were deploying to the front line in the Zaporizhzhia region on a recent night, faced a four-mile hike through rain and mud, the intelligence commander said. If they were wounded and captured, Russian troops would execute them, he warned them.
The long, arduous slog to carry in ammunition and food to supply troops and to carry out the wounded was one reason Ukraine could not sustain its counteroffensive, a company commander, Adolf, 23, said.

Ambulances and supply vehicles came under fire from kamikaze drones so often that his unit stopped using them, resorting instead to a four-wheeled buggy that volunteer engineers rigged up to carry a stretcher.
...
The toll is heavy for all units along the front. Almost everyone has been wounded or survived a narrow escape in recent months, soldiers said.

“We are short of people,” said an intelligence commander of the 117th Brigade who uses the call sign Banderas, after the actor. “We have weapons but not enough men.”


A some point such units will break down, likely at the end of the currently harsh winter.

That might become the moment the Russians will change from active defenses to bigger attacks. But big red arrow movements are difficult to prepare for as NATO surveillance via spy planes and satellites is able to detect any concentration of forces.

Expanding multiple local attacks to find a weak position to then lead up rear forces where a breakthrough seems likely is probably the better strategy.

Posted by b on January 10, 2024 at 15:02 UTC | Permalink

https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/01/u ... .html#more

******

Before total mobilization
January 10, 16:29

Image

On the eve of the law on total mobilization.
The main trend in Ukraine in 2024 is an increase in the number of people wishing to escape from Ukraine at any cost.

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8885655.html

Hitting a hotel in Kharkov
January 11, 12:05

Image

Footage of a night hit at a hotel in Kharkov, where foreign mercenaries were staying.
The Gauleiter of Nazi-occupied Kharkov mournfully announced “10 wounded and 1 Turkish journalist.”
(Video at link.)

The Baltic states and Poles who came to Kharkov usually hung out in this hotel.

Image

Yesterday, around midnight, Russian troops attacked the Park Hotel in Kharkov. The strike, alas, did not lead to any result (only the facade was damaged, and the mercenary unit lived on the ground floor). Therefore, the Ukrainian media promptly made a story about how the Russians were shelling peaceful hotels.

Immediately after the strike, units of the International Legion and foreign mercenaries who lived in similar buildings began to be notified throughout Kharkov.

It is not yet known how quickly all the hotels will be empty and whether anyone will return to their walls. There are still disputes about the same long-empty Tourist Hotel: whether there is anyone there or not, and the SBU periodically conduct ostentatious check-ins in order to provoke the Russians to attack.

However, approaches to fire damage began to change. Strikes are carried out in Kharkov on a daily basis, targets are reached and hit if further work needs to be done.

https://t.me/rybar/55824 - zinc

https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/8886966.html

Google Translator

******

Why Did Ecuador Suddenly Decide To Transfer Old Russian & Ukrainian Arms To The US?

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 11, 2024

Moscow will certainly frown upon this move and possibly condemn it as unfriendly, but hopefully its policymakers understand the predicament that Ecuador found itself in and which arguably compelled its president to do this under duress.

New Ecuadorean President Daniel Noboa declared on Wednesday that “we will swap Ukrainian and Russian scrap metal (with the US) for advanced equipment costing $200 million” in a move that will certainly be frowned upon by Moscow. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said a year ago in January 2023 that his country was keeping a close eye on its Latin American partners after the US proposed swapping their Russian arms for modern American ones in order to send the former to Ukraine.

Director of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s Latin American Department Alexander Shchetinin then told TASS on the sidelines of last October’s Russia-Latin America conference that “Latin America is not involved in this, and this situation at the moment is absolutely clear and unambiguous.” Noboa wasn’t elected until later that month, but it was newly elected Argentine President Javier Milei that folks were fretting about when it came to the possibility of a Latin American state breaking ranks on this scheme.

“Russian-Argentine Ties Will Stay Stable So Long As Milei Doesn’t Send Arms To Ukraine”, and Russian Ambassador to Argentina Dmitry Feoktisov said that discussions with his new counterpart convinced him that Buenos Aires has no such intentions to ruin bilateral relations that way or any other. Milei has a diehard pro-American worldview but even that hasn’t led to him taking the US up on its swap proposal, at least not yet, which raises questions of why Noboa was the first to do so despite few suspecting him.

He's also a newly elected pro-American leader but isn’t considered anywhere near as zealous as Milei. The timing of his announcement adds context to this decision and reveals that it was arguably taken under duress. Narco-terrorists staged a very violent but ultimately failed nationwide insurrection this week that led to mutual declarations of war between them and the state. The situation is extremely tense and the armed forces need all the support they can muster at this existential moment.

Noboa revealed that the American Ambassador pledged to provide an assistance package to his country, while National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan promised closer security cooperation but Pentagon spokesman John Kirby ruled out dispatching troops to help quell the unrest. The last-mentioned official also said that it’s too early to tell whether there might be a large-scale refugee/migrant outflow from Ecuador towards the US’ southern border, but it also can’t be ruled out either.

Putting everything together, it becomes apparent what probably transpired, namely that the US likely made its assistance package conditional on Ecuador agreeing to last year’s proposed swap of old Russian arms for modern American ones. Had it not been for this week’s ultimately failed insurrection, the consequences of which continue to reverberate throughout the country and could even spill across its borders, it’s highly unlikely that Noboa would have taken Washington up on that offer.

Now, however, he needs to ensure that he has America’s full support for his armed forces during this unprecedented crisis in his country’s history. As was earlier written, Moscow will certainly frown upon this move and possibly condemn it as unfriendly, but hopefully its policymakers understand the predicament that Noboa found himself in and which arguably compelled him to do this under duress. The tangible impact on the Ukrainian Conflict will be practically nil, but the optics are still troubling.

As NATO’s proxy war on Russia through Ukraine finally winds down and that battleground state braces for another possibly forthcoming offensive, the transfer of old Russian and Ukrainian arms isn’t going to make any difference except perhaps to help some units cling to the Line of Contact. It’ll in no way enable them to launch another counteroffensive after last summer’s failed one nor pose any serious threat to Russia’s overall security interests. The only importance rests in the US’ modus operandi.

To explain, if it indeed made its anti-terrorist support for that country conditional on its leadership agreeing to last year’s swap, then this means that more such violence elsewhere – whether connected to Ecuador’s or independent thereof – can lead to more Latin American states breaking ranks on this issue. As painfully proven by this week’s developments, some regional countries are much more fragile than previously thought, and non-state actors like narco-terrorists can throw them into chaos in a single day.

As Congress debates how to resolve the border crisis, one solution might be to make this proposal part of a package deal with the US’ Latin American partners whereby the security support that they’re requesting to help address migrant flows would be dependent on them agreeing to that swap. Those that don’t won’t get modern American arms, with all that entails for them possibly following Ecuador’s path, but it’s unclear whether policymakers are clever (or rather devious) enough to consider this.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/why-did- ... -decide-to

Last Month’s Secret Talks On Ukraine In Riyadh Were A Dud But Revealed Something Important

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 11, 2024

India was likely the participant that passed along details of this supposedly secret event to Russia weeks before Bloomberg’s report after Lavrov touched upon it in an interview last month, which testifies to how much these two trust one another.

Bloomberg reported last week that Saudi Arabia hosted another round of talks on Ukraine after last summer’s Jeddah talks in mid-December, though this time they were kept secret from the media. They were a dud just like the prior ones since India, Saudi Arabia, and Turkiye continued pressing Ukraine and its G7 allies to recommence peace talks with Russia. Those three and the other Global South states that attended, which were less than last summer according to the report, also refused to sanction Russia.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova dismissed that meeting as a PR stunt while Sputnik reminded everyone that her boss Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov was actually the first to reveal the existence of these supposedly secret talks during an interview in late December. What follows are the exact words that he said at the time, which will then be analyzed in order for the audience to appreciate their actual importance in this context:

“Considering our good relations [with Global South countries, ed.], I can say that another meeting like this took place 10 days ago – the G7 plus the leading developing nations. Not all countries from the world majority attended. Some turned down their invitations. The meeting took place in complete secrecy. Nothing was reported about it; there were no leaks…Our close allies and associates who attended that meeting did not promise to keep an issue that concerns Russia secret from us.”

While Bloomberg didn’t report on the full guest list from mid-December’s supposedly secret talks, they nevertheless explicitly noted the aforementioned three Global South states’ participation while also stating that Brazil, China, and the UAE eschewed participation in that latest round unlike the prior one. It can therefore be surmised that India, Saudi Arabia, and/or Turkiye were the one(s) that informed Russia about the details of that event.

The case can compellingly be made that India certainly shared this information with Russia considering those two’s decades-long special and strategic partnership that’s evolved in recent years to take on global dimensions. This isn’t hyperbole like some skeptics might instantly imagine but is predicated upon what Lavrov himself said about their ties during his press conference with Indian External Affairs Minister (EAM) Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar on the last week of the year during the latter’s trip to Moscow:

“We are sincerely grateful to our Indian colleagues for their striving to adopt a responsible approach to discussing and resolving regional and global problems in line with the principles of equitable and fair international cooperation. This approach is typical of India’s position on the developments in Ukraine and around it.”

Here are three pieces about last summer’s talks with respect to India’s position that Lavrov just praised:

* “There’s Nothing Wrong With India Attending The Western-Centric Ukrainian Peace Talks In Jeddah”

* “The Jeddah Talks Backfired On Zelensky”

* “India Showcased Its Neutrality At Last Weekend’s Western-Centric Peace Talks On Ukraine”

The hyperbolic fearmongering from a top Alt-Media influencer, who accused India of being a “Trojan Horse” for participating in those talks in a tweet that was seen by over 128k people, was proven wrong after that country proudly held firm on its position of principled neutrality towards this conflict. Those talks backfired by serving as a platform for India to promote its position to a wider audience of Global South and Western states alike, thus further legitimizing it after 18 months of Western media lies.

With this insight in mind as well as Lavrov’s revelation from late last month, it can therefore be confidently concluded that India certainly shared the details of that event with Russia, and that country would have been more forthcoming about everything than any other participant if others did so too. This previously unknown diplomatic engagement showcases just how much they trust one another in spite of the false claims to the contrary from the Western media and top Alt-Media influencers alike.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/last-mon ... on-ukraine

*******

Russia Sees No Prospects for Resuming Grain Deal

Image
A ship transporting grain through the Black Sea, 2023. | Photo: X/ @EuromaidanPress

Published 11 January 2024

President Putin said that the conditions of the Grain Initiative with his country were not met.

On Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Viktoria Abramchenko said that Russia sees no prospects for renewing the Black Sea Grain Initiative.

Part of a package agreement, the second part of the grain initiative, which provides solutions to problems related to maritime logistics, freight, insurance, and connecting the Russian Agricultural Bank to the SWIFT payment system, saw no positive changes, said Abramchenko.

She said that the Russian diplomatic department has continued to work on the grain deal, but there are few prospects for its resumption.

President Vladimir Putin said that the conditions of the deal with Russia were not met, and the main goal of the deal -- the supply of grain to needy countries, including African ones -- was not achieved.


The Black Sea Grain Initiative is a part of a package agreement, signed by representatives of Russia, Türkiye, Ukraine, and the United Nations on July 22, 2022, allowing food and fertilizer exports from Russia and Ukraine through the Black Sea.

Moscow suspended its participation in the agreement on July 17, 2023, saying that it would return to the deal as soon as the Russian part of the agreement is fulfilled.

The reduction in international trade in agricultural goods as well as the Western blockade of the Russian economy has failed to affect the internal situation of this country.

"Russia is a self-sufficient country in every sense of the word," Putin said during a meeting with the local residents of Anadyr, the capital of the Chukotka Autonomous Area.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Rus ... -0004.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:37 pm

The compromise option
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/12/2024

Image

“The progress in the war in Ukraine is pushing the United States towards a painful choice,” two international relations experts, George Beebe and Anatol Lieven, write this week in one of the media affiliated with the Quincy Institute, one of the examples of think-tank . tank favorable to the agreement against those who want to continue the war no matter who falls and without taking into account the consequences. The fundamental thesis is that if Washington wants “a Ukraine with a viable path to liberal governance and entry into the European Union, we will have to concede that it cannot be an ally of NATO or the United States and that this neutral Ukraine will have to have verifiable levels of quantities of weapons that can be disposed of.” The resignation from NATO and the paralysis of its expansion towards the Russian border has been, along with the protection of Crimea, the emphasis of Russia's discourse and negotiation attempts, which have always been met with a blockade.

In practice, this refusal to negotiate Ukraine's neutrality, a position that until 2022 was the majority among the population, has always implied the willingness to take risks and subject the country to the possibility of an even broader war. It was like this in April 2022 when, as even the main Ukrainian negotiator has confirmed, Russia was willing to sign peace in exchange for that resignation, but something similar happened throughout the Minsk years, in which the commitment was seen as the worst of the options. That opinion was common in kyiv, Washington and Brussels, which always used the process to prolong the situation, pressure Russia and reinforce Ukraine until the territory was recovered without the need to offer any concessions to Russia (in reality, those concessions were not to Moscow but to Donetsk and Lugansk). Without a political framework to support it, the ceasefire was unviable and the risk of a broader war remained, whether due to an attempt by Ukraine to forcibly recover lost territories or, as ultimately occurred, a Russian attack that will force Kiev to accept certain concessions.

The point of view of Beebe and Lieven, examples of political realism that prioritizes the stability of the world order taking into account the interests of the great powers and the consequences they may have for other states, has been an anomaly in the spectrum of literature on the current conflict. The Ukrainian failure has increased skepticism and pessimism about Ukraine's chances of achieving everything it seeks - recovering its territories, joining the EU and NATO and weakening Russia as much as possible - and has led to a growing number of articles that They leave the door open to compromise, at least temporary .

Even so, its existence is enough for Volodymyr Zelensky's advisors to regularly denounce "bot farms of the FSB, the pro-Russian lobby , various internet freaks " who, in the opinion of Mijailo Podolyak, seek to exploit pessimism. Evidently, they are much more to their taste in articles like the one published this week by Foreign Policy , which states that “if Ukraine can achieve the momentum in the ground war that eluded it during its failed summer offensive, Kiev will have a real path to victory". With its simple premise, which turns desire into an argument, the article encourages the optimism that Podolyak calls for, which already points to good news. According to the advisor to the Office of the President, in addition to the assistance packages from different countries and the long-term investment commitment, American assistance is about to be unlocked. This may be the case, although these funds are no guarantee of changes on the front. The multibillion-dollar 2023 offensive proves that a constant flow of funding and resources does not necessarily mean victory. However, the Ukrainian Government seems willing to underestimate Russia again and risk receiving a new defeat that, like the current one, it will try to cover up with attacks in the rear, more useful for its allies than for its population, and with its careful speech which presents Ukraine as the last line of defense of the rules-based international order .

Faced with any compromise, even temporary, Volodymyr Zelensky again insisted yesterday on the unacceptable nature of freezing the conflict. Keeping the war active has been a strategy that kyiv has used since the beginning of the war in Ukraine, especially in the years of the Minsk process. At that time, the existence of bombings, which Kiev always blamed on Moscow even if they occurred against the DPR and LPR, was enough to justify the Ukrainian refusal to advance the political points of the agreements. The risk of a ceasefire occurring at this time is low, but Ukraine needs something more: it cannot allow its partners to accept the maintenance of a defensive war without prospects for offensive operations with which to achieve its objectives without any concessions. to the other side. In this case, it would not be about granting political rights in exchange for recovering Donbass, but rather giving up the lost territories and NATO's ambition to achieve peace. Although very different in form, substance and political cost, both have been equally unacceptable to Ukraine.

During the Minsk years, Ukraine used the bombing of the Donbass front areas as a mechanism to put pressure on Russia, but also as a tool to prevent the freezing of the conflict. Currently, that objective involves insisting that any slowdown in the war - a consequence, according to official discourse, not of the Ukrainian defeat but of the lack of sufficient Western assistance - favors Russia. Hence, Zelensky demands from his partners more involvement in the war and, above all, more speed in delivering those items on Ukraine's wish list.

In general terms, a ceasefire, or even the slowdown of the front, which necessarily implies a reduction in the intensity of the fighting, favors, in addition to the civilian population, the weakest party at that time. Ukraine argues, for example, that its allies' delay in delivering weapons for the 2023 offensive favored Moscow, which took advantage of the winter to recover from the casualties suffered and to prepare its defense. Without that time, Zelensky argues, the Zaporozhye offensive would have been more successful. However, this extended time between offensives has also allowed Ukraine to replenish its casualties and, above all, to train the new brigades according to, supposedly, NATO standards. The problem has not been the delay or the lack of weapons, but the inability of Ukraine to overcome the Russian army on a front where it was aware that an attack was coming. The poor training that soldiers say they have received in the West may not have helped either.

With compromise still a less acceptable option, the Zelensky government is willing to subject the country to another year of war with the aim of repeating last summer's offensive. And he wants to do it quickly, ruling out the freezing of the conflict or its slowdown, which could occur in the form of preparation for a new offensive, not for the current year, but for the next. That option is as unacceptable as a possible ceasefire, although that timing would currently and without a doubt favor Ukraine. That is the logic of those who, from realism, propose accepting what they consider a painful commitment, but necessary to save the country from the destruction that the current moment will imply, in which Ukraine runs the risk of lacking ammunition for its air defenses. . European and American funds will arrive, but Russia now has the opportunity to try to destroy, for example, the Ukrainian military industry. That has been the objective of the latest missile attacks, as even British intelligence has confirmed, which has little inclination to confirm Russian claims.

Reducing the intensity of the battle would protect Ukraine from such attacks and preserve the country's remaining military and industrial potential. However, it would require negotiation and possibly a series of concessions, something that kyiv and its allies remain unwilling to do. The risk of stumbling over the same stone again is not enough to modify the action plan, nor is the logic of Minsk any longer an option. At that time, as François Hollande, who participated in the negotiations of an agreement that Ukraine never intended to comply with, would comment years later, “the Minsk agreements and the subsequent ceasefire did not allow the area controlled by the separatists to expand. That is one of his merits.” The only time in which the Ukrainian authorities have sought de-escalation has been when a collapse of their army was predicted. A similar situation would be, also now, the only circumstance in which a Ukrainian openness to compromise can be expected. That point is currently far from being reached, but its risk accelerates the appearance of proposals that, even from pro-Ukrainian positions, see the compromise, even if temporary, as the lesser evil or those who, like Oleksiy Arestovich, look to the rejected April 2022 agreement as a relatively dignified way out for Ukraine.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/12/28933/

Google Translator

******

What's happening in the Northern Military District zone: chronicle for January 11
January 12, 2024
Rybar

Image

Russian troops continue to launch massive attacks on enemy targets in different areas of the so-called. Ukraine, which indicates general changes in the approach to fire destruction of enemy targets. Today in Kharkov the Park Hotel hotel complex came under fire , but the hit did not lead to any results.

The Ukrainian command has been preparing for several months for a possible offensive by the Russian Armed Forces in the North Ukrainian , Slobodzhansky and Kupyansky directions . To this end, the enemy is rapidly strengthening the border with Belarus and Russia . Nevertheless, it has not yet been possible to build an obscene line of defense of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, however, there is no evidence of preparations for an offensive by Russian troops.

In the Donetsk direction, assault detachments of the Russian Armed Forces, after the complete liberation of Marinka , are attacking south of the city - on the flanks of Novomikhailovka . At the same time, the greatest activity of Russian troops is recorded on the northern flank, the main battles on which took place after the occupation of the “ Zverinets ” fortified area.

But the biggest headache for Bankova is the current bill on mobilization, which today they decided to withdraw from the Verkhovna Rada for amendments. Be that as it may, no one intends to slow down the pace of Ukrainian mobilization. Therefore, let us remind the Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers about one simple way to save their lives - call “ Volga ” on frequency 149.200.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
In the North Ukrainian direction, the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue to rapidly strengthen the northern border with Belarus and Russia. And if on the Belarusian border the enemy does not experience difficulties with the construction of a line of fortifications, then on the Russian-Ukrainian border the Russian Armed Forces regularly strike enemy concentrations, and also carry out raids by the DRG. For example, today the Russian DRG operated in the area between the villages of Gremyachka and Leonovka .

State Secretary of the Security Council of the Republic Alexander Volfovich said that everything along the border between Belarus and the so-called Ukraine is mined. In total, according to intelligence data, there are over 500 thousand anti-personnel and anti-tank mines. And this is a fairly eloquent answer to the question “When will Turnips?” (for those who are not in the know: when will the Russian Armed Forces finally move from north to south). It will no longer be possible to advance in mechanized columns along the main road directions as in February 2022.

True, the devil is in the details. Ukrainian formations are digging three lines of defense and fortified areas along the border. True, everything ultimately always comes down to the quality of the units. For example, on January 6, a reconnaissance and sabotage group of Russian special forces managed to eliminate about a dozen Ukrainian military personnel and militias in the Sumy region , easily bypassing both mines and fortified areas, and then disappearing into forest plantations.

So, if you wish, you can bypass all this (the main thing is not to go head-on along the main road directions). And for comparison: 500 thousand mines are buried along the border of Belarus. On the Orekhovsky sector of the front ( Kopani - Rabotino - Verbovoye - Novofedorovka - Novopokrovka ), according to some estimates, there were about 420 thousand mines (a section approximately 25 km long ). After such figures, 500 thousand mines per 700 km, the borders seem quite small.

Image
A similar situation is developing in the Slobozhansky direction . Today, the Ukrainian Armed Forces have not been so active in shelling the border area of ​​the Belgorod region: at the moment, only shelling of the village of Tishanka is known . However, this does not mean that the enemy will stop artillery terror of the Russian border area.

Image
Yesterday, around midnight, Russian troops attacked the Park Hotel in Kharkov . The strike, alas, did not lead to any result (only the facade was damaged, and the mercenary unit lived on the ground floor). Therefore, the Ukrainian media promptly made a story about how the Russians were shelling peaceful hotels.

Immediately after the strike, units of the “International Legion” and foreign mercenaries who lived in similar buildings began to be notified throughout Kharkov . It is not yet known how quickly all the hotels will be empty and whether anyone will return to their walls. There are still debates about the same long-empty Tourist Hotel: whether there is anyone there or not, and the SBU periodically conduct ostentatious check-ins in order to provoke the Russians to attack.

However, approaches to fire damage began to change. Strikes are carried out on Kharkov on a daily basis, targets are further reconnaissance and hit if further work is needed. And this is critically important for residents of the Russian border region, who are waiting for the creation of a buffer zone on their southern borders.

Image
From the Kupyansky direction, footage recently appeared on the Internet in which you can see the Swedish 155-mm Archer self-propelled artillery mount , which in the West is considered one of the best weapons of this type. The wheeled self-propelled guns were located between the villages of Grushevka and Sobolevka on the road to Kupyansk , and the distance to the LBS is about 16-17 km. A rather reasonable question from many readers was why self-propelled guns operate unhindered so close to the front line without harm to themselves?

The fighting in the Kupyansky sector moved into the positional stage: the assault on Ukrainian strongholds near Sinkovka first dragged on, and now has completely died down. Footage of one of these unfortunate episodes has already spread across the Internet. One of the reasons for the increased resistance of the Ukrainian Armed Forces was the concentration of enormous enemy resources towards Kupyansk. In addition to the two new mechanized brigades that operate here, the 45th artillery brigade was also transferred. It is on its balance sheet that the Swedish “Archers” are located, and a month ago it was visited by the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, General Mikael Büden .

And since these self-propelled guns are now operating in the Kupyansky sector, then you need to look for them near convenient road junctions, along which a quick exit to the firing line and subsequent retreat back is possible. But Kupyansk doesn’t have many such roads.


At the same time, the Ukrainian command continues to build defensive lines in the Kupyansk direction , consisting of “dragon teeth”, minefields and a network of trenches for personnel. The Ukrainian authorities have been building such fortifications for several months, trying not only to hold back the onslaught of Russian troops, but also to release parts of the manpower from the front.

Image
In the Liman direction, Russian troops are still trying to break through the defenses of Ukrainian formations on the approaches to Yampolovka and Terny . At the same time, units of the Russian Armed Forces are fighting in the areas of Serebryansky forestry and the Torsky ledge . In turn, the enemy tries to counterattack, but each attack is successfully stopped by small arms and artillery fire. However, the lack of frames does not allow us to establish the front configuration in this area.

Image
In the Bakhmut direction, Russian troops are conducting an offensive in the area of ​​Bogdanovka and Krasny . Despite significant losses, the Ukrainian command continues to send its units into battle, trying to prevent a significant advance of the Russian Armed Forces. Meanwhile, on the southern flank, Russian units are storming the enemy’s defenses north of Kleshcheevka , while at the same time massive air and artillery strikes are being launched against the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Image
There were no significant changes in the Avdeevsky direction : fierce fighting continued in the Stepovoye area , and clashes were observed south of the treatment facilities. Unconfirmed information was also disseminated about the advance of the Russian Armed Forces near Pervomaisky in the southwestern section of the fortified area.

Image
In the Donetsk direction there were battles to the west and south of Marinka . According to unconfirmed reports, the Russian Armed Forces fought in the area around Georgievka , but it is too early to talk about any progress. In addition, Russian artillery continues to hit enemy rear lines. Thus, a strike was carried out on an Ukrainian Armed Forces facility in Mirnograd .

At the same time, Ukrainian formations did not stop shelling the civilian infrastructure of the Donetsk People's Republic . The Kalinin and Nikitovsky districts of Gorlovka were hit . In addition, arrivals were recorded in the Kuibyshevsky and Petrovsky districts of Donetsk . At the same time, in the afternoon, the enemy launched a strike from the Czech Vampire MLRS in the Kuibyshevsky district near the Topaz plant . According to preliminary data, 11 residential buildings were damaged and five people were injured.

Image
In the Ugledar direction, the Russian Army continued to carry out flank attacks in the Novomikhailovka area . Some successes were reported to the northeast of the settlement, where the Ukrainian Armed Forces were forced to abandon a number of fortified positions. At the same time, enemy positions in Novomikhailovka itself are under heavy fire from Russian artillery and aviation.

Image
There are no significant changes in the Zaporozhye direction . Worsening weather conditions do not allow active offensive actions to be taken, which is why the sides are limited to artillery duels and local clashes near the settlements of Rabotino and Verbovoye .

The Russian Armed Forces are carrying out intensive artillery and UAV strikes on the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces along the entire line of contact. At the same time, this morning the enemy launched another missile attack on the cities of Molochansk and Tokmak in the Zaporozhye region.

Image
In the Kherson direction, positional battles continue at Krynoki . At the same time, weather conditions do not allow the enemy to quickly rotate and supply units located in a populated area. Russian units carried out attacks on identified positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces on the right bank of the Dnieper in the area of ​​Sablukovka , Tokarevka and Kherson .

At the same time, Ukrainian formations continued to strike settlements on the left bank of the Kherson region . The villages of Krynki , Aleshki , Peschanovka , Peschanoye , Kardashinka , Novaya Zburevka and Novaya Kakhovka were under enemy fire . At the same time, Ukrainian UAVs attacked the village. New Camps , as a result of which a woman was injured.

Political events
How military lobbyists work in the West

American general and former head of the CIA David Petraeus told CNN that Russia will not stop at the so-called. Ukraine and its next military target will be Moldova . The quality of Petraeus's analysis can be judged by his previous comments. At the end of 2022, the general predicted the imminent collapse of the Russian Armed Forces, and a month ago he explained the failure of the Ukrainian Armed Forces offensive by the slow release of military assistance, although earlier he himself hastened the start of the notorious counter-offensive .

Petraeus's concerns about the so-called Ukraine and Moldova are explained, at a minimum, by his work in the large investment fund Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. LP (KKR) , in which he headed the geopolitics department after leaving the CIA. The KKR fund, for example, owned the company Engility , which was a contractor for the US military departments and carried out reform of the law enforcement system of Ukraine. In 2019, KKR made bets on the U.S. military industrial sector, advising other companies on deals or making military acquisitions on its own. Since 2022, the foundation has also been actively involved in assessing the energy transition in Europe.

So Petraeus is an ordinary military lobbyist who is primarily concerned with successful deals in the defense sector that can be sold under the slogan of helping the so-called. Ukraine and the threat to other countries. However, one should not make the mistake of thinking that Petraeus is lobbying for weapons. Its main task is to support the necessary social tension, which forms a sufficient basis for making money on this very tension.

Petraeus’ manipulative statement not only meets the interests of the US military-industrial complex, but also plays into the hands of the Moldovan authorities. The team of President Maia Sandu is actively exploiting the thesis of an imaginary military threat from the Russian Federation, and this seems to be the only argument to justify all the unpopular actions of the Moldovan authorities.

In 2023 and 2024, the Moldovan government unprecedentedly increased the military budget by more than 60% by cutting social spending. The other day, the Moldovan military department announced plans to increase military purchases. At the same time, the West continues to allocate colossal military budgets to Moldova. For example, today Sweden approved the allocation of almost half a million dollars as part of the NATO program to build up the military potential of Moldova. In Chisinau, obviously, they continue to count on large grants from the West.

Populism around the unpopular law on mobilization


The head of the Ukrainian faction “ Servant of the People ” David Arakhamia said that the scandalous bill on mobilization was withdrawn for revision . There is nothing surprising in this step: the Ukrainian authorities, God forgive me, are trying to put a good face on a bad game, waiting to see who the Western masters will appoint as extreme and who will bear responsibility for the “forced measures.”

The repressive flywheel of mobilization in the territory of the so-called. Ukraine is being promoted to the fullest, subpoenas are being served without delving into “good reasons” and without delay. So everything that happens is aimed, first of all, at the internal (and partially external) audience.

There is another important point with the bill. Ukrainian foreign missions copied the data of all Ukrainian conscientious objectors and refugees abroad, who, after the publication of the bill, rushed to re-register documents. But we will probably find out very soon what kind of targeted work will be carried out on these individuals.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

******

U.S. Suspends Military Aid to Ukraine

Image
Since the war beginning in February 2022, the Biden government has sent more than $75 billion in cash and equipment to Ukraine for defense. Jan. 11, 2024. | Photo: X/@PlanetReportHQ

Published 11 January 2024 (9 hours 36 minutes ago)

"We have issued the last package that we had withdrawn and for which we had funding," John Kirby said.

White House National Security Council strategic communications coordinator John Kirby said at a briefing Thursday that "the assistance we were providing has come to a halt."

The White House official also said it is very important that Congress continues to approve the allocation of money to Ukraine. He stressed that Kiev needs help more urgently during the winter period.

Media reported that aid to Ukraine has decreased following the failure of its counter-offensive against Russian troops.

It also adds political divisions in the U.S., since some sector is in favor of continuing to support the European country, while others disagree with that measure.


Since the war beginning in February 2022, the Biden government has sent more than $75 billion in cash and equipment to the country for defense.

Most of the aid has gone to Ukraine’s military operations, to keep its government functioning and to meet its humanitarian needs.

https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/U.S ... -0020.html

******

Emphasis Which All Of Us...

... who have any military and intel education and experience on both American and Russian side have been saying non-stop about "Battle of Kiev" which... never happened. This is stated by my good friend Colonel Vladimir Trukhan starting at 42:00.



Pay attention to what Vladimir emphasizes and which I soon will chafe my tongue in my videos by explaining that military victories are won on operational and strategic levels. This is what Vladimir says, AGAIN, Russian Armed Forces "never lost operational initiative for a day while having some tactical complications" (c). I may add--inevitable in the operations of such scale. Write down in your notes: Colonel-Operator of Central Apparatus of Russian Defense Ministry Vladimir Trukhan. This is how military professionals think on operational-strategic level, you also learn every day, because once you stopped learning--you are done as a professional. US military lost this ability to learn, or learned all the wrong lessons--this is why the "plan" of the "counteroffensive" to slice Russian defense in two by going for Melitopol and then cut land corridor to Crimea was done by military amateurs who never fought the enemy who can maneuver better than any NATO force can, and it could never work.
Well, we all know how it "worked"--160,000+ casualties and 18,000 pieces of equipment lost by VSU in this "counteroffensive". You have to have a real "talent" to be able to kill so many men and lose so much hardware. Do they teach these "operations" by collective Baghdad Bob and Iraqi Generals in the US Army Command and General Staff College in Leavenworth, Kansas? How else can you explain this unprecedented failure with catastrophic consequences for 404, not to mention the fact that it dramatically accelerated geopolitical collapse of the whole Pax Americana.

For those who wonder what Operational Initiative is:


A set of created conditions, situation and objective circumstances that make it possible to impose one’s will on the enemy during an ongoing operation for a certain time in the corresponding direction. The side that has seized the initiative has the freedom to choose methods of action, directions and timing of strikes, and can solve assigned tasks in favorable conditions, while the other side is limited in its actions. Seizing and maintaining operational initiative is one of the most important factors in achieving success in operations. It is achieved by delivering preemptive strikes, surprise actions, more decisive, daring and active use of one’s troops (naval forces) and assets, gaining fire superiority, air and sea supremacy, and constraining enemy actions.

How you gain it--that's the issue of military art, a real one. It is not enough to talk about it.

http://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2024/01 ... of-us.html

*******

The internets got other fish to fry today.
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:17 pm

Zelensky's cynical economic game and pensions
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/13/2024

Image

More angry and saddened than usual, Volodymyr Zelensky has continued to demand more money and more resources from his partners. This last week, he has done so in two main scenarios: his visit to the Baltic countries and during Rishi Sunnak's brief stay in kyiv. Coinciding with the visit of the British Prime Minister, which occurred just a few hours after his country participated in the unilateral attack - and without prior passage through any parliament of the countries that carried it out and, of course, not with the approval of United Nations - against Yemen, Zelensky wanted to insist on his most common request, ammunition for air defense. To the delight of the Ukrainian president, Sunnak did not come empty-handed and announced a slight increase in British military assistance compared to the previous two years. The British premier estimated the package at 3 billion pounds, an important amount, although very far from the more than 100 billion dollars that Zelensky expects to receive this year in the form of military and financial assistance from Washington and the European Union.

On Thursday, Mikhailo Podolyak openly stated that the US package is close to being approved, although it is difficult to know if this is based on real information or if it is just his wishes. Brussels, for its part, is working to increase bilateral assistance from the different member countries and also to revoke or circumvent the Hungarian veto of the financial package that the Ukrainian State must support during the next year. Although the reality of war means that much of the news coverage related to Ukraine is limited to the war issue, there are many problems that plague the country also far from the front. High-intensity, hand-to-hand fighting is currently limited to the front across the south-southeast of the country, so much of Ukraine is militarily affected by missile attacks, but not by day-to-day battles. . Even so, the consequences of war go far beyond the bombings and destruction caused on the front line or in the rear. As the Ukrainian press reported this week, according to United Nations data, 40% of Ukraine's population will need humanitarian aid this year. Although his situation is not as important a priority as the Patriot systems or anti-aircraft munitions, the poverty of the population has also become an argument with which Zelensky hopes to obtain more financing from his partners. Like an important part of the country, the State itself also depends on foreign assistance to sustain itself.

As an aging and deindustrialized country, Ukraine suffered from a serious demographic problem that predates the outbreak of war by many years. What's more, not warning about its implications has been, along with disinterest and the desire to save, one of the main reasons why the last Ukrainian census dates back to 2001. The population loss that began with the disappearance of the Soviet Union It has been increased in recent years of crisis due to emigration in search of employment to both the European Union and the Russian Federation and finally due to the war. Contrary to what happens in other active war conflicts on the planet, in the Ukrainian case the most vulnerable population is not minors, but rather the war has disproportionately affected the older population.

After years of cuts, elimination of state subsidies that limited the price of basic services and miserable retirements, pensioners have now become an argument for Zelensky, in whose party there are voices that even call for the elimination of retirement pensions. in favor of a model according to which families are responsible for the care, needs, expenses and costs of older people. That proposal, which was raised in the early days of Zelensky's presidency and is to the right of each and every world government, was never officially raised, although it is significant that it even emerged as an idea.

However, now that President Zelensky needs an emotional argument to plead with his partners to approve new funds for the maintenance of the Ukrainian state, the elderly population is once again useful. “We buy a lot of things with our own money, but when there is no financing,” the Ukrainian president lamented this week, adding that “we cannot not give pensioners a pension. “I’m not asking for a handout, but without a pension, older people will simply die.” Taking advantage of the situation, Zelensky insisted that “we have more than eleven million pensioners. Is there any other country like this in Europe?”

Zelensky's plea, which has not made a great impression on the political or media level since the well-being of the civilian population is not a priority for Ukraine's allies either, sounds like strong cynicism taking into account his party's ideology and actions. of the State in recent years. It is also curious that, suddenly, Donbass pensioners are once again useful to increase the number of pensioners whom Zelensky says he wants to feed.

A month ago, Ukraine already threatened - its pensioners and its allies - with suspending pension payments in case of lack of financing. At that time, as throughout the last decade, there was no particular interest in the precedent that kyiv had already used to completely stop the payment of public pensions, benefits and salaries in the Donbass territories outside its control. Unlike in Crimea, where Russia took charge of the territory and those payments since 2014, the pensioners of Donbass, at that time the war conflict that most affected the elderly population worldwide, were left abandoned to their fate. The example of Donetsk and Lugansk, where the interruption of payments occurred first de facto and later by decree, shows the effects of the State's disinterest in its population. During the first months, in which the Popular Republics were still only armies waiting for Russia to arrive to take charge of the Government of the region, the elderly population had to fend for themselves from their small crops in orchards and gardens. , the help of relatives or neighbors and the humanitarian aid that came across the border. This public and private humanitarian aid slightly mitigated a catastrophic situation in which many frontline villages were isolated even from emergency shipments.

For years, even going to European courts, pensioners from the DPR and LPR fought for their right to receive their pensions without any argument being enough for Ukraine to change its position. Partly a savings measure and partly collective punishment for a population considered disloyal, Ukraine always refused to resume payments in Donbass and only facilitated the collection of pensions to those people who registered as internally displaced, that is, who left Donetsk or Lugansk, and went to Ukrainian territory to obtain it. The measure condemned Donbass pensioners to give up their Ukrainian pensions or travel across the front, with the waits and the risk that this entailed for their health. In 2018, the UNHCR representative in Ukraine stated that “the courts have said that nothing prohibits the population from receiving pensions,” something that extended to both internally displaced people and residents in territories that were not under government control. . At that time, Noel Calhoun added that “place of residence is not included in the list of conditions under which a person can lose the right to a pension,” something as obvious as it is irrelevant for Ukraine. At that time, UNHCR claimed to realize that “a part of the population with limited mobility in territories not controlled by the Government is neglected.” By then, the DPR and the LPR had already started paying their own pensions thanks to the funds that came from Russia, insufficient pensions that did not cover all the needs of the elderly population, but still a help far superior to the contempt that for a decade they have received from Ukraine.

In her limited and polite criticism of Ukraine, the UNHCR representative added that kyiv had, through its own banks, all the necessary mechanisms to resume its constitutional obligation to pay pensions to a population that it still continued to claim it considered as its own. . “Everything is in the hands of the government,” Calhoun said. It was like this, the resumption of payments in Donbass was in the hands of the kyiv administration. Hence the final result. Despite the proposals, some of them from the Red Cross, which even offered to take charge of the transfer of the funds, Ukraine always refused to change its position. The well-being and lives of the elderly population of Donbass was, and remains, irrelevant to the Ukrainian Government, willing, however, to cynically use it to beg its foreign allies for more funding. Now, these pensioners are included in the total number of people at risk of death in the absence of Western funds, funding that, evidently, will never reach them, just as their Ukrainian pensions did not reach them for years.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/13/el-ci ... pensiones/

Google Translator


******

What's happening in the Northeast Military District zone: chronicle for January 12
January 13, 2024
Rybar

Image

For the first time in recent days, Russian troops did not carry out massive attacks on targets in the rear regions of the so-called. Ukraine , limiting itself only to fire engagement of targets along the border and front-line zones.

Meanwhile, Ukrainian formations again fired at populated areas of the Donetsk agglomeration . Gorlovka came under fire , where the Ukrainian Armed Forces struck emergency personnel and an ambulance. According to the latest data, two civilians were killed and nine more were injured.

Meanwhile, on the special operation fronts, fierce fighting continues along the entire line of contact. However, near Kupyansk, after a series of unsuccessful attempts to take Sinkovka head-on, the fighting finally acquired a positional character. This was largely influenced by the lack of competent use of troops on the front line.

In the Yuzhnodonetsk direction, Russian troops were able to advance on the northern flank of Novomikhailovka , while artillery is relentlessly working on enemy positions inside the populated area itself. And to the south, units of the Russian Armed Forces are conducting an offensive through forest belts in the direction of Konstantinovka .

Positional battles continue on the Vremevsky sector of the front. However, over the past month, Russian assault troops managed to advance at the Staromlynovka - Oktyabrskoye - Novodonetskoye line . At the same time, near Staromayorsky , the parties are engaged in permanent clashes over the Grushovataya gully .

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
In the Slobozhansky direction, the enemy continues to strengthen the border zone. The RF Armed Forces carry out regular strikes on the enemy's air defense routes, preventing them from shelling populated areas in the Bryansk , Kursk and Belgorod regions with impunity . Despite this, the Armed Forces of Ukraine once again border areas of the Belgorod region . The following settlements were under fire from Ukrainian formations: Dronovka , Glotovo , Bezymeno , Krasnoe and Kazinka . In addition, the Ministry of Defense reported on the operation of air defense systems in the skies over the region. At the same time, the village of Kozinka in the Grayvoronsky District was attacked by a Ukrainian UAV: ​​three civilian vehicles were damaged, but no civilians were injured.


It is noteworthy that after the recent shelling of Belgorod , local authorities began to strengthen passenger transport stops with concrete blocks and sandbags. Obviously, the measure is not permanent, but for the first time it is very appropriate.

Image
There are no significant changes in the Kupyansky direction . The Russian offensive has virtually stopped, and the situation at Sinkovka has not changed for several months. During this time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces were able to accumulate significant forces in this direction. However, this does not mean that the Ukrainian Armed Forces are going to go on the offensive. Enemy defensive lines are already being built in the Kupyansk area. If the Ukrainian Armed Forces are able to gain time and build fortifications, there is a high probability that part of the enemy contingent will be redeployed to other, more problematic sectors of the front.


It is worth talking about systemic problems in the “West” group of troops, using the example of the unsuccessful assault on Sinkovka in the Kupyansk direction . A few days ago, we drew attention to the accumulated problems in management in the Dnepr group of troops in the Kherson direction . However, while talking about this, it would be unfair not to notice the problems in other areas.

The Ukrainian segment published new footage of the unsuccessful assault on the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the vicinity of Sinkovka by Russian troops in December 2023 (here is an example of a detailed analysis from colleagues ). The video recorded the advance of an armored group to the northern outskirts of the village from the side of Liman 1st . Moving in a column in an open area of ​​terrain, where the armored group came under attack from artillery and kamikaze drones. As a result, all the equipment was knocked out at once, and the personnel scattered in the trenches nearby, where they also came under fire. At the beginning of the video, you can see several more damaged Russian armored personnel carriers at the exit from the landing. There had been attacks of this kind before, but a frontal assault was still chosen as the only possible one. Perhaps the reason was the dense mining of the area. But the example of other sectors of the front shows that this problem can be solved: the offensive near Bakhmut and Avdeevka is evidence of this.

This sad incident illustrates a systemic problem in the lack of competent use of troops on the front line. In this case we are talking about the Western Military District , whose units are responsible for the Kupyansky sector . It won't be possible to take Sinkovka head-on due to its geographical location. This requires advancement from Ivanovka and Timkovka , but the assault fists that would be useful there are sent over and over again to Sinkovka . Instead of thoroughly thinking through the operation to blockade Kupyansk , systemic strikes on rear targets, and destruction of supply routes for Ukrainian formations, everything came down to assault operations. The moment was missed, and the advance near Kupyansk that had begun in the fall came to naught. Ukrainian formations have increased their strength, creating a fairly powerful group. Assault groups advance without massive artillery bombardment along the same route. Intelligence means, apparently, are not enough. Or the question is their incorrect use. And the result of this action, using the example of Ugledar or Belogorovka in 2022, is always the same.

At the same time, with the supply of the Western Military District troops, it seemed that everything was not so bad: at least the supply of the assault groups in the Western Military District was really established. An ordinary soldier has everything from ammunition to RPGs and a first aid kit filled to the brim. Air defense and electronic warfare systems are being supplied, but for some reason they are either being protected or are not even trying to introduce them into infantry units.

But here, as in the case of the Dnepr group, the main problem is the human factor . The thinking of some people responsible for planning has remained at the same level as before the SBO . No conclusions were drawn. The task has been set - complete it, no matter how. There is no awareness that this does not work .

Image
In the Soledar direction, Russian troops continue to put pressure on the flanks of Bakhmut . At the same time, as before, the main target of the Russian group is Chasov Yar . Despite the general decline in the quality of Ukrainian troops in some areas, the active advancement of the Russian Armed Forces is hampered by the difficult terrain, as well as the dense line of fortifications of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Contrary to some statements, the enemy does not have a shortage of ammunition, as well as FVP drones, which also affects Russian advancement. At the same time, fighting continued on the southern flank in the area of ​​Kleshcheevka and Andreevka .

Image
In the Avdeevsky direction, offensive actions slowed down for a while. The enemy is attempting to counterattack from Berdych . At the same time, information is received about a slight advance of the Russian Armed Forces south of the treatment facilities . In the southwestern sector, the fighting is local in nature.

Image
In the Donetsk direction, the Russian Armed Forces continue to conduct offensive operations west and southwest of Marinka towards Pobeda and Georgievka . At the same time, there were reports of a slight advance of Russian troops north of Marinka , but this information needs clarification.


Meanwhile, the Ukrainian Armed Forces did not stop striking the Donetsk agglomeration . The Kievsky, Kirovsky and Petrovsky districts of Donetsk , Makeevka , Gorlovka , Yasinovatsky district , as well as the village of Golmovsky were under enemy fire . In Golmovsky, employees of the DPR State Unitary Enterprise “Regional Energy Supply Company” came under enemy fire, after which the Ukrainian Armed Forces deliberately attacked an arriving ambulance with a UAV. According to local authorities, in total in Gorlovka and Golmovsky during the shelling, at least nine civilians were injured and two more people were killed.

Image
In the Ugledar direction , heavy fighting for Novomikhailovka continues : the Russian Armed Forces managed to advance to the northeast, and inside the populated area itself, the VKS and artillery are working on the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. At the same time, the offensive continues on the southern flank, where Russian troops seek to occupy forest belts on the way to Konstantinovka . In addition, attacks are being carried out on concentrations of enemy forces in nearby populated areas; Pobeda was under targeted fire throughout the day .

Image
In the Vremevsky sector, positional battles continue along the entire line of contact. In recent days, Russian troops have managed to expand the zone of control north of Oktyabrsky and Staromlynovka . Attempts were also made to break through the enemy’s defenses west of Staromayorsky at the Grushevataya gully . In turn, the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ attacks from Staromayorsky were not successful.

Image
In the Zaporozhye direction, fighting continues at Rabotino , where Russian troops are gradually displacing the enemy from their occupied strongholds. Near Verbovoy , due to bad weather, positional battles are taking place; units of the Russian Armed Forces repelled an attack by the Ukrainian Armed Forces in small assault groups. There have been reports of Russian troops advancing near the village of Nesteryanka , through which one of the routes to Orekhov passes : if the information is confirmed, this means the emergence of a new section of the front.

In addition, accumulations of enemy manpower and equipment in the Rabotino and Verbovoye areas were defeated . In turn, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fired at the city of Tokmak in the Zaporozhye region from MLRS . Preliminary results and details of the shelling are unknown.

Image
In the Kherson direction, the situation remains the same: positional battles are taking place in Krynki and on the islands . The deterioration of weather conditions in this area led to a decrease in the already deplorable combat capabilities of the enemy. Thus, frozen channels limit the possibilities for the delivery of cumulative ammunition and the transfer of manpower, and the positions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the bridgehead area are not heated. This leads to many members of the Ukrainian formations getting frostbite.

In addition, the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue daily shelling of settlements on the left bank of the Kherson region . Over the past time, Aleshki , Krynki , Peschanovka , Cossack Camps , Sagi and New Camps have come under fire . On the right bank of the Dnieper, according to Ukrainian media, the Russian Armed Forces carried out artillery strikes on Kherson , Zolotaya Balka , Tyaginka and Ivanovka .

Political events
On the role of Moldova in the training of Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers

Recently, the Russian Foreign Ministry again summoned the Ambassador of Moldova due to the anti-Russian policy of Chisinau. The main reason is the training of Ukrainian Armed Forces military personnel by NATO instructors on the territory of the republic, despite its constitutional neutrality.

There is nothing surprising in the next call of the Moldovan ambassador to the carpet, since Maia Sandu’s office is consistently destroying all ties with Russia. Other claims by the Russian Foreign Ministry include blocking Russian and pro-Russian publications, discrimination against Russian citizens when crossing the Moldovan border, and constant aggressive statements addressed to Moscow. So the training of Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers is a logical continuation of the anti-Russian policy.

The Moldavian Foreign Ministry denied the training of the Ukrainian military , calling the accusations “fake,” but the claims against Chisinau did not arise out of nowhere. Recently, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine named Moldova among 30 countries in which Ukrainian military personnel are trained according to NATO standards. In particular, we are talking about the “European Union Mission for Military Assistance to Ukraine” (EUMAM Ukraine), which includes Moldova. In addition, in June, a group of sappers of the Ukrainian Armed Forces underwent training in Moldova, but in Chisinau this action was called “humanitarian aid.”

The training of Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel in Moldova is an open secret, despite attempts by Maia Sandu’s office to claim otherwise. Moldova, to the detriment of its own interests, is already completely subordinated to the military and economic needs of the so-called. Ukraine, acting as a transit territory for both the supply of Western weapons and the transportation of Ukrainian grain. And, judging by how events are developing, it is clearly not worth expecting the Moldovan government to change its political course.

About smuggling on the Ukrainian-Transnistrian border

The other day, the Ministry of State Security of Transnistria reported an incident on the Transnistrian-Ukrainian border on January 7 with the use of firearms. As the department notes, after the shootout, two Pridnestrovian citizens were moved to the so-called territory. Ukraine. The official bodies of the republic reported about the incident at the border only three days later, and the so-called border service. Ukraine completely denies the clash.

With a high degree of probability, a standard showdown between smugglers took place . Transnistria, with its semi-official status and border with a warring state, is an ideal place for the flow of smuggling, primarily drugs and weapons . Thus, in 2023, Transnistria announced the suppression of an attempt to import a large batch of drugs from the so-called. Ukraine to Moldova with the participation of a citizen of the PMR. Smuggling also goes in the opposite direction: for example, a case of weapons and ammunition being smuggled from Moldova to the PMR was recently recorded . And this is only what leaks into the information field.

It is unlikely that all the details of the incident on January 7 will become known, since someone’s shadow interests may be affected, and money loves silence.

About the blockade of the Ukrainian border by Polish carriers


The day before, the authorities in the Polish Medyka did not issue carriers permission to strike at the checkpoint with the Ukrainian Shegini . The protesters planned to block truck traffic from January 15 to March 15. Previously, it was blocked by farmers, but they stopped the strike and the checkpoint remained open to trucks.

At the moment, three checkpoints are blocked - Dorogusk - Yagodin, Grebennoye - Rava-Russkaya, Korcheva - Krakovets - and drivers intend to maintain the blockade at least until February .

According to the latest data at the so-called border. About 2,000 trucks have accumulated in Ukraine and Poland , the waiting time lasts on average 2-4 days.

Due to the blockade, the Kiev regime continues to lose funds and the ability to organize illegal transportation. According to official data, in November alone, due to the blockage, Ukrainians lost about $860 million in exports and imports , and in December $210.6 million - but these figures are not final.

Protests on the border with the so-called Ukraine continues from 2022. From time to time, the parties managed to achieve a truce, but after some time, carriers and farmers again organized a blockade. Officially, carriers demand the abolition of benefits provided to Ukrainians and the restoration of the previous mandatory licensing procedure. But besides this, the Poles are demanding access to the Ukrainian Shlyakh system , which has become the focus of fraudulent and corruption schemes. With access to it, Poles will not only have the opportunity to participate in transportation, but also organize it through the territory of the so-called. Ukraine.

About the visit of the British Prime Minister to Kyiv

President of the so-called Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak today signed an agreement to provide security guarantees to the Kiev regime for a period of 10 years. According to the Ukrainian “leader,” according to the document, British obligations will remain in force until the country joins NATO. It sounds promising.

The head of the British government announced another military aid package worth about 2.5 billion pounds , and also promised to “ continue assistance in the coming years .” The bulk of the funds will be spent on the production and purchase of unmanned aerial vehicles and unmanned boats, as well as artillery shells, most of which are planned to be produced on British territory ( “surprisingly” that not on the wreckage of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex ).

Of course, the agreement reached does not provide for provisions on the direct participation of Great Britain in an armed conflict with the Russian Federation or the deployment of the kingdom’s troops on the territory of the so-called. Ukraine. Thus, Great Britain became the first G7 country to provide “security guarantees” to the Kyiv regime. The document itself is a piece of writing. The agreement does not provide for anything new, or anything that London is not already doing to support the so-called. Ukraine.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

*****

Poland Deeply Involved in Nord Stream Terrorist Attack

Lucas Leiroz

January 13, 2024

Polish participation in the Nord Stream attack may be related to an American geopolitical project for Europe.

It increasingly seems clear that there was Western participation in the terrorist attack that destroyed the Nord Stream 1 and 2 gas pipelines. As leaked by journalists and anonymous sources, the explosions were certainly caused by a secret American military operation involving Ukrainian proxy agents. Now, it is revealed that Polish authorities acted to prevent an investigation into the crime, which further substantiates the hypothesis of a NATO act – and also clarifies the real reasons for such attack.

The news was reported by the Wall Street Journal. According to the newspaper, Polish agents hid evidence and obstructed the investigation into the explosions. Journalists claim that the Warsaw authorities vetoed cooperation with the investigative team made up of Germany, Sweden and Denmark, and even prevented those suspected of involvement from being detained and interrogated on Polish soil.

For now, investigators’ main suspicion is that a team of Ukrainian saboteurs rented a yacht from a Polish company. It would be essential, in this sense, for the Polish police to collect testimony from the company’s employees and capture Ukrainian suspects on Poland’s territory. However, Warsaw boycotted the investigators’ work and barred important evidence from being collected.

Investigators still do not know whether the Polish government had an active role in the attack. Certainly, more detailed information about this will still take some time to be discovered. However, the obstruction of the investigations is solid evidence that, whether or not it participated in the operation, Poland is cooperating with the aggressor side.

In fact, it is necessary to analyze the case taking into account Seymour Hersh’s opinion. The American journalist, who was also the first to report U.S.’ responsibility for the attack, stated that Washington’s objective with the attack was to affect Germany, coercing Berlin to continue supporting Kiev and preventing the European country from prioritizing its own industrial interests.

“Biden’s timing seemed aimed at Chancellor [Olaf] Scholz. Some in the CIA believed that the president’s fear was that Scholz, whose constituents were lukewarm in their support for Ukraine, might waffle with winter coming on and conclude that keeping his people warm and his industries prosperous was more important than backing Ukraine against Russia”, he said.

In addition, we must remember that the U.S. has long had a plan to undermine German development. Being the European industrial heart, Germany is undoubtedly the country with the greatest material capacity to break the semi-colonial policy implemented by the U.S. in Europe. Berlin could, in partnership with France, form a kind of “European multipolar axis”, repositioning the continent in global geopolitics. Avoiding this kind of European “multipolar turn” is an American priority – and certainly the most viable way to achieve this goal is through the industrial neutralization of Germany.

Not by chance, Berlin is being led towards rapid deindustrialization. Without the energy partnership with the Russian Federation – and without nuclear development, hampered by the “green” paranoia -, Germany does not have the capacity to continue maintaining its previous industrial production levels. The country is being forced into an economic decline whose consequences are not limited to internal social problems but to a true paralysis of Europe’s geopolitical potential. In other words, without German industry, Europe is not able to become a “pole” of the multipolar world and remains submissive to American interests.

In this sense, the destruction of the gas pipelines appears to have been an American “checkmate” against Europe. By bombing Nord Stream 1 and 2, Washington made the end of German-Russian energy cooperation an unavoidable reality, ceasing to be a simple Germany’s political choice and becoming a material inevitability. Consequently, Europe no longer has the necessary resources to break away from the U.S. and become an independent bloc.

Neutralizing ties between Russia and Germany has always been the West’s greatest geopolitical ambition. According to the classical principles of geopolitics, the Russian-German rapprochement would represent a kind of “Hertland unification” and would create a bloc so powerful that it would put any U.S. expansionist intentions at risk. This explains why Washington has historically tried to keep the Germans and Russians apart – and why it is seeing the current moment as an opportunity to consolidate this process of Russian-German rupture.

However, it is not enough to simply generate scorched earth in Germany. Europe must continue to survive industrially so that American plans on the continent keep viable. It is more interesting for the U.S. to transfer Germany’s industrial core to another country than to simply throw the whole of Europe into an unprecedented social crisis – which could lead to uprisings and political changes. It is precisely at this point that the Polish factor must be considered.

According to some investigators, there is a current plan by the U.S. to transfer European industrial nucleus from Germany to Poland. The reasons would be many. Poland is less dependent on gas imports for its energy sovereignty. Given the high level of hostility towards Russia, the country had already been reducing its imports of Russian gas years before Western sanctions were implemented, which is why the impact on the Polish economy was smaller than on the German one. Furthermore, Poland is already becoming one of the main European industrial countries, having a big growth potential that can be strategically managed.

There are obviously other factors that make Poland interesting for American plans in Europe. The country is seen as a more “reliable” and “stable” ally by the U.S. than Germany. Despite recently embracing anti-Russian paranoia, Germany has long been marked by a foreign policy of strong diplomacy with Moscow, mainly due to the so-called “Ostpolitik” doctrine. On the other hand, Poland was easily fanaticized by the historical revanchism encouraged by the West and is marked by advanced levels of Russophobia and even rehabilitation of Nazism.

Poland is more hostile to Russia than Germany, so it suits the U.S. that Warsaw occupies a more important role in Europe than Berlin. As the quickest way to destroy once and for all the potential of German industry was through the definitive end of energy cooperation with Russia, so the U.S. bombed the gas pipelines – and certainly had Polish support, as Warsaw is obviously also interested in increasing its economic and political status on the continent with American support.

More than that, these U.S. plans for Poland also help explain the recent crisis in relations between Warsaw and Kiev. As well known, Poland has moved away from Ukraine significantly in recent months. The main justifications are the massive entry of Ukrainian grains into Poland, damaging national agriculture, and the Ukrainian pro-Nazi ideology, which disrespects the history of the Polish people. However, this is a weak narrative. A simple economic problem is not enough to unbalance good relations in the political and military sphere – and, in the same sense, Warsaw never really cared about the Ukrainian Nazi problem, which in fact also exists in Poland itself.

It seems that there may have been some type of communication at a high political level for the Poles to reduce their participation in Ukraine. In its heightened Russophobic paranoia, the Polish government was making hasty decisions in the conflict, significantly increasing its interventionism. The Polish-Ukrainian borders were completely opened to facilitate the flow of NATO weapons and mercenaries, creating a kind of “de facto confederation”. Meanwhile, the expansionist agenda was advanced in Warsaw, which aimed to retake Polish-majority territories in Ukraine through military invasions disguised as “peacekeeping missions” in the Western region of the country.

The Russian government at the time made it clear that any Polish intervention would be considered a violation of red line, subject to serious retaliation. Clearly, the situation could escalate into a conflict involving Russia and Poland – and the U.S. does not want that, both because it would put NATO’s “collective security” clause to the test, and because it would harm American plans to change the European economic-industrial structure. The U.S. apparently wants Poland free from the consequences of the conflict – at least for now. So, NATO’s advisers certainly planned Polish-Ukrainian diplomatic estrangement.

As we can see, there seem to be deep reasons why Poland wants to hide those responsible for the terrorist attack against the gas pipelines. Even if Warsaw had no direct participation, it certainly cooperated to harm Germany and increase its own geopolitical relevance – otherwise Radoslaw Sikorski would certainly not have publicly thanked the U.S. for the attack.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... st-attack/

Image

Goodbye, Gonzalo Lira. Try to Rest in Peace

Declan Hayes

January 13, 2024

Gonzalo Lira becomes another innocent victim of Zelensky’s draconian dictatorship.

Is the truth propaganda? America creates chaos all around the world—and calls it the “Rules Based Order”. The more you understand, the less you forgive. (Twitter feed of the late Gonzalo Lira).

Gonzalo Lira, whom I last wrote about in August, is no more. Having previously been placed on a Ukrainian kill list, he succumbed to pneumonia brought on by deliberate and systematic neglect in a Ukrainian dungeon, another innocent victim of Zelensky’s draconian dictatorship. For more information on his demise, please go to Tucker Carlson, Defense Politics Asia, Sprinter or any other credible source. To read reports disparaging him, go to The Daily Beast, the BBC, stopfake.org or any other NATO site.

Although I have also recently written of Julian Assange, there must be very real fears MI6 will Gonzalo him if it suits their broader agenda because in Belmarsh, as in Kiev, there is no such thing as the rule of law as one is supposed to understand it. There is certainly no such thing as justice because, if there was, the British would, at a minimum, produce Assange as the Russians do CIA agent Navalny, whose ugly mug never seems to be off Russian TV.

Meanwhile, in the Hague, South Africa seeks justice for the Palestinians through the good offices of Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, whose Irish mother inspired her to follow a legal career following the 14 August 1976 execution of 12 year old Majella O’Hare on her way to her local church by war criminal Private Micheal Williams of the 3rd Battalion, Royal Parachute Regiment, Britain’s equivalent of the Waffen SS, whose speciality was the mass murder of Catholics in Belfast, Derry and other Irish cities, atrocities for which not one of these serial war criminals or their political leaders has ever been held to account.

Just as the British and their Irish toadies argue to this day that their own Waffen SS are not cold blooded killers, so also do counsel for Israel still argue, with a straight face mind you, that the Israeli Army is the world’s most moral army. Here, for those of you who like the bizarre, is former BBC big wig Andrew Marr hosting some dude commenting on that case. And here is that same Andrew Marr creep in 2003 outside the door of war criminal Tony Blair salivating over NATO’s criminal destruction of Iraq. Andrew Marr and Tony and Cherie Blair all deserve their place in the dock and then on the gallows as do any and all other NATO parrots or paratroopers.

Briefly flit to Pakistan where the United States has vowed to “continue to support democratic suppression”, something at which they truly excel on the Indian sub-continent as they do globally.

Except in places like Lebanon where Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah found it amusing that the United States has enrolled the tiny Seychelles to help them conquer Yemen. Far from having a beef with the Seychelles, the Lebanese peace activist quipped that “to make the coalition seem powerful, they [NATO] added some country, the Seychelles or Meychelles or whatever, and I had to Google what it even was! Turns out it’s some island at the end of the world, with a population of less than 100,000,” he chuckled.

Far from disrespecting the Seychelles (whose name is confusing in Arabic), Nasrallah, like many other leaders, just had to get his head around what passes for NATO’s battle plans, which range from murdering Chilean-American dumplings, showcasing psychotic American transexuals, torturing Imran Khan and Julian Assange, swamping Western Europe with Ukrainian grifters and draft dodgers, destroying German industry by blowing up German infrastructure, robbing Russian assets, putting pregnant Ukrainian women into the front lines and doing all sorts of other silly things that make King Canute’s attack on the sea seem like the soundest of military tactics.

And even though Nasrallah, like most normal folk, likes a joke, not everyone does. Witness the fate of Fr Joseph Müller Hitler’s Nazis executed on 11 September 1944 for cracking a pretty lame joke about Hitler, variations of which we have all made. But the sad truth is Nazis, be they in Hitler’s Reich, in the British Foreign Office or in Zelensky’s rump Reich, have very stilted views on what constitutes and what does not constitute humour and what constitutes and what does not constitute a threat.

Gonzalo Lira posed no more a threat to Zelensky than Fr Müller did to Hitler. The murder of both was gratuitous and did nothing to prop up the respective Reichs Müller and Lira supposedly offended. Müller and Lira were but two innocent victims amongst far too many of very deranged and very dangerous men.

Though he died alone, Gonzalo Lira was not alone in his transgressions. There are, for starters, the Communist Kononovich twins, Ukraine’s persecuted Christians, Ukraine’s conscientious objectors and all those young girls who ended up strapped to Kiev lampposts for offending the Banderite cat stranglers in one way or another. And then, of course, there are the Palestinians the Israelis, the British Foreign Office and others liked to laugh at, just as they laughed at the Chechens before they sorted out the Nazis in Mariupol, just as they will probably sort out the Nazis in Gonzalo’s Kharkov, spurred on in part, by Gonzalo’s wanton murder, as well as that of countless others, all of whom, like poor Majella O’Hare herself, deserve remembrance.

And, in thinking of Majella O’Hare, though we should salute the work of Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC and those like her, just as we should pray for the Kononovich brothers, Imran Khan and those like them, we should see that, as with Majella O’Hare’s South Armagh, others, like the Houthi and Hezbollah will, sad to say, make their own points much more robustly than Ms Ní Ghrálaigh KC does, aided and abetted, it has to be said, by the sort of justice the British, Israeli and Ukrainian armies so callously dish out to young and old, strong and weak alike.

To conclude, here is Gonzalo Lira naming and shaming the self-serving oligarchs behind not only Zelensky and Hunter Biden but this entire Ukrainian war which Zelensky claimed to be fighting for “global freedom” but which was really about enriching himself and jailing and physically destroying, with the full support of the American government, truth tellers like American citizen Gonzalo Lira, who refused to buy into the rank criminality of Clown Prince Zelensky, Hunter Biden and their British, American and home grown cronies.

The more you understand, the less you forgive. So wrote the late Gonzalo Lira, whose passing is one more reason why the rump Ukrainian Reich and all it stands for must be totally and utterly destroyed.

https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/ ... est-peace/

While searching for a photo of Gonzalo I happened upon much trash heaped upon him by the cheerleaders of fascism, so today I am motivated by hatred of those scum. And it is true, I gravedance upon bad humans like Gorbachev and Raygun. They deserve it. Gonzalo does not, he was a fine journalist and an example that the sternographers of the MSM are shamed by. Hopefully the internets will provide me today with targets for my bile.
PS- Tucker Carlson is not a credible source. The enemy of my enemy is not my friend.

*******

The US Is Responsible For Gonzalo Lira’s Death In A Secret Ukrainian Prison

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 13, 2024

This travesty of justice is important for many reasons, not least of which is that it discredits the USG’s stated policy of supposedly always helping those of its citizens who’ve been detained abroad. Quite clearly, double standards are applied based on who they are, where they were detained, and the context of their alleged crimes.

Dual American-Chilean national Gonzalo Lira died of pneumonia in a secret Ukrainian prison last week where he was being held after his arrest for criticizing the Ukrainian authorities, allegedly justifying “Russian aggression”, and then trying to flee the country last summer after he was temporarily released. The US Government (USG) is responsible for this since it could have easily secured his release if any of its representatives had the political will to do so, yet they instead let him languish and ultimately die.

Before his last disappearance over the summer, Lira predicted that he’d probably die if he was caught trying to cross the Hungarian-Ukrainian border, which his ultimately what happened. He’d previously claimed that Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland of “EuroMaidan” infamy personally hates him, and this probably accounts for why American officials didn’t try to secure the release of their detained citizen abroad despite doing so for others and having the means if they wanted.

The fact of the matter is that it’s officially a matter of US policy to provide support for those of its citizens who’ve been detained abroad and to work as hard as possible to secure their release, especially whenever their alleged crime concerns something even remotely connected to them exercising the freedom of speech. Lira’s case would have been a textbook example of this had he been arrested for his alleged crimes in Russia, China, or Iran, but because they were committed in Ukraine, the USG was silent.

Officials apparently calculated that it’s better to let him languish and ultimately die, in between which he claimed that he was tortured per the last video that he shared on Twitter prior to his disappearance, than to secure his release and return to the US where he might then continue railing against Ukraine. These expectations backfired, however, after top influencers from Tucker Carlson to Elon Musk raised maximum awareness of his plight and now his ultimate demise as the arguable result of mistreatment.

Lira earlier revealed that he was suffering from a raft of health problems, which the USG was aware of, but representatives did nothing to ensure that he was at least treated with the bare minimum of human decency in line with international law. If they wanted to, they could have seen to it that his problems were properly treated while in prison in order to avoid his death, but nobody seemed to care. The outcome lends credence to his prior claim that Nuland personally hates him and likely wanted him dead.

This travesty of justice is important for many reasons, not least of which is that it discredits the USG’s stated policy of supposedly always helping those of its citizens who’ve been detained abroad. Quite clearly, double standards are applied based on who they are, where they were detained, and the context of their alleged crimes. In other words, the entire process is politicized, and only those whose cases are considered to be in alignment with the USG’s interests are supported while all others are ignored.

The second point is that the personal animosity that members of the USG like Nuland had towards Lira partially account for why they didn’t wager that securing his release and return to the US, or at least providing him proper medical treatment, would deflect from claims that Biden is beholden to Kiev. Trump and his supporters previously claimed that the president is caught up in such a web of corruption there that everything that his administration does towards Ukraine must be seen in that light.

Biden, or rather his policymakers, could have attempted to partially discredit those claims by securing Lira’s release and return or at least his proper medical treatment while in prison so as to then present this as supposed proof that the alleged conflict of interest between him and Ukraine doesn’t really exist. After all, if it did (or so the narrative would go), then his administration wouldn’t champion the rights of its citizen who was detained for exercising his freedom of speech despite this making Zelensky look bad.

The last point to make is that the USG’s culpability for Lira’s death in a secret Ukrainian prison is meant to send a message to all American dissidents abroad that their officials literally want them to die for the faux crime of speaking out against their policies. The Kiev regime maintains a growing kill list that’s ironically named “peacemaker” (“myrotvarets” in Ukrainian) and which includes a slew of American and other Western citizens like Lira.

Each of them could also be detained or killed without the USG caring after the precedent established by his death. Some might self-censor their views in public while others will remain defiant, but none of them should have to think that the USG tacitly endorses a similarly dark fate for them as well. It’s this awareness among them and the wider public that’ll inflict the most damage to America’s reputation over the long run, which its officials could have prevented had they helped Lira when they had the chance.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-us-i ... or-gonzalo

Nobody should expect any consideration from the US government if they contradict it's propaganda, to do so is idealistic. I'm sure Gonzalo didn't.

******

STATE DEPT CONFIRMS DEATH OF US JOURNALIST (GONZALO LIRA) JAILED BY UKRAINE – TASS
JANUARY 12, 2024

RT, 1/12/23

Chilean-American blogger Gonzalo Lira has died in a Ukrainian prison, Russian news agency TASS said on Saturday, citing a response it received from the US Department of State. The blogger’s death was first announced by his family on Friday.

Lira, 55 at the time of his death, lived in Kharkov and blogged as ‘CoachRedPill,’ but switched to YouTube commentary after Russia launched its military operation in Ukraine in February 2022. He was arrested by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) last May and accused of “discrediting” the Ukrainian leadership and the military.

“I cannot accept the way my son has died. He was tortured, extorted, incommunicado for 8 months and 11 days and the US Embassy did nothing to help my son. The responsibility of this tragedy is the dictator Zelensky with the concurrence of a senile American President, Joe Biden,” his father Gonzalo Lira Sr. wrote in a note published by The Grayzone.

Lira Sr. also reached out to X host Tucker Carlson, confirming the death of his son in Ukrainian custody. He had spoken to Carlson about the case in early December.

READ MORE: Who was the ‘tortured’ US journalist who died in Ukrainian captivity?

Lira resurfaced from custody in late July with a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), revealing his torture in jail and attempts by the SBU to extort him for money. He said he was trying to flee to Hungary and seek asylum. “Either I’ll cross the border and make it to safety, or I’ll be disappeared by the Kiev regime,” he wrote, in his last public message.

Two days later, a source confirmed to RT that Lira had been caught and imprisoned by Ukrainian authorities.

According to a handwritten note Lira’s sister received on January 4, provided to the Grayzone by her father, Gonzalo Lira Jr. had severe health problems caused by pneumonia and a collapsed lung, which began in mid-October. Ukrainian prison authorities only acknowledged the issue on December 22, and stated he would undergo surgery.

Following his father’s appearance on Carlson’s show, X owner Elon Musk personally inquired about Lira’s case with both US President Joe Biden and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, apparently to no effect.

Lira was a national of both the US and Chile. According to his thread from last July, the Chilean Embassy in Kiev at least tried to help him, while the US mission gave him only “empty bromides.” Lira suggested that this was because Victoria Nuland – currently the acting deputy to Secretary of State Antony Blinken – hated him personally.

https://natyliesbaldwin.com/2024/01/sta ... aine-tass/



https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2024/01 ... -dead.html
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

User avatar
blindpig
Posts: 14412
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:44 pm
Location: Turtle Island
Contact:

Re: Footnotes from the Ukrainian "Crisis"; New High-Points in Cynicism Part V

Post by blindpig » Sun Jan 14, 2024 1:42 pm

Compromised weapons
POSTED BY @NSANZO ⋅ 01/14/2024

Image

The West's actions in the Ukrainian war are based on trust and the just cause of kyiv's struggle, which acts in good faith and in the interests of citizens, Europe and the democratic world in mind. That, at least, seems to be the discourse that Washington and Brussels present when it comes to seamlessly accepting the Ukrainian narrative of the war between good and evil, the free world and tyranny, democracy and autocracy. In this speech it does not matter that Ukraine has outlawed all non-nationalist opposition, that the left was expelled from institutions and politics long before the Russian invasion, that Zelensky threatens not to pay pensions or that Kiev already did so with Donbass pensioners for years, nor that the main mission of the Ukrainian delegation in Minsk was to sabotage any possibility of progress in a peace process in which it only wanted to recover the territory without complying with the political concessions that it had agreed to grant to the population of the DPR and the LPR in exchange for peace.

In reality, the only aspect in which Ukraine has received some criticism from its partners has been that of corruption, a discourse shared by Washington, Brussels and the Ukrainian Government. Because the issue of corruption, a very useful electoral argument, is also the only one in which Ukraine accepts a certain degree of self-criticism, admitting its scourge, although always with the ability to blame external actors, oligarchs who are part of other families. politics, Russia, or simply to isolated cases when it comes to people close to the circle of power. In the last two years, Ukraine has sabotaged a possible peace agreement, imprisoned uncomfortable opponents on clearly political charges, condemned people for their likes on social networks, allowed the harassment and humiliation of anyone classified as a collaborationist or favorable to Russia. in the territories near the front and captured potential recruits in the streets. Even so, given the political decision made in advance to open negotiations for entry into the European Union, representatives of the bloc's institutions have constantly praised Ukraine for its improvements in matters, for example, of freedom of expression, democratic reforms and adaptation of legislation to Western standards and values. And once again, the only pending issue seems to be corruption.

Corruption has also been the only cause capable of bringing down people around Zelensky. Although he clung to the position for several months, the now former minister Reznikov - who in the early days of the Zelensky administration took on an infamous role as the leader of the Ukrainian sabotage of any progress in the Minsk process - was completely sentenced by the time he that several corruption scandals linked to the supply of the Armed Forces became known. The case revolved around the extra costs of supplying goods and services to soldiers, with which officers and vice ministers profited at the expense of poor service to the troops. The question of whether something similar was happening in relation to weapons has always remained up in the air.

An important part of the assistance to Ukraine, which at the end of 2023 was estimated at around $233 billion, is allocated to weapons and ammunition, commercial purchases made with billions from the collection of Western countries by the It has been described so many times as the most corrupt country in Europe. The blind trust - real or opportunistic - placed in Kiev and its ability to use those funds correctly has not prevented moments from arising over the last two years in which it has been questioned whether all that financing is used for what that was conceived.

War necessarily implies the existence of a market in which those who are capable of operating in gray zones manage to obtain weapons and ammunition that are difficult to find, at least in large quantities, in peace situations. The war situation also implies a certain degree of lack of control, of inability to fully record the material used, that lost due to enemy attacks and, in cases of territorial setback, that which the retreating party has not managed to maintain. Hence, control over the continuous location of the weapons delivered is a complex task that also lends itself to all types of sabotage, deliberate losses or diversions to the always lurking black market.

Although generally without definitive evidence, there have been periodic suspicions about the quantities of weapons or ammunition that were being destined for illicit sale by Ukrainian units or officials. Russia has warned on several occasions of the danger that some of the weapons delivered by the United States could end up on the black market, being distributed by different world conflicts or putting at risk civil aviation or navigation or the lives of civilian populations in other areas of the world. world.

Until now, the United States and its allies have alleged the good work of the Ukrainian authorities and shown all their confidence in Kiev's ability to maintain control, use these weapons for good , that is, only to kill Russians, and have always denied the presence of weapons donated to Ukraine anywhere beyond the front to which they have been destined. The intensity of the battle and the need for all the weapons at its disposal means that it is to be expected that the vast majority of what was received will actually be used against the Russian troops and the cities and population under Russian control. However, even the United States now admits to not having been able to properly track deliveries. “The Pentagon has failed to adequately track most of the compromised weapons the United States has sent to Ukraine since the Russian invasion according to a new report from the Department of Defense inspector general,” Connor Echols wrote this week in Responsible Statecraft .

The report does not seek to analyze the possibility of diversion of US weapons sent to Ukraine, possibly because it is not intended to call into question kyiv's ability to maintain control of the enormous flow of weapons it is receiving. The objective of the investigation is only to monitor those weapons considered most compromised, around 1.7 billion dollars. Of these, the Pentagon concludes that around one billion (59%) have not received the follow-up that would have been required.

“To understand the importance of the report,” explains Responsible Statecraft , “it's helpful to look closely at what end-use monitoring means in practice . Under US law, EUM focuses on ensuring that US weapons reach and remain in the hands of their intended recipients.” This form of control implies that there is no monitoring of the way in which the weapons - even those that are considered most dangerous - are used, but only that they remain in the expected hands. The article adds that the nature and intensity of the war and the scarcity of American operatives on the ground have made it difficult to track the enormous flow of foreign weapons. And despite the confidence in Ukraine that Washington and Brussels have publicly proclaimed, Biden has been forced to deal more rigorously with tracking the weapons sent.

“As fears of diversion grew, guided in part by Ukraine's long history as a hub of arms trafficking, the Biden administration announced in late 2022 an expanded tracking program for high-risk weapons like Stingers, which could be used by non-state actors to shoot down commercial airliners.” The fear that a significant amount of large-caliber or especially sensitive weapons could end up on the black market is not just a matter for Russia, but even suppliers in Kiev are aware of the effect of corruption and the schemes of the underground economy can have in a country known precisely for this type of actions.

Despite expanded efforts to track the most dangerous weapons , the United States admits to having lost track of more than half of them. The American concern is not, at least judging by the reasons for starting the investigation and the way in which it is carried out, to verify the proper use of weapons by Ukraine, but to ensure that it does not reach the hands of its designated enemies. . The fear is not that they will be used in other conflicts or sold and resold on the black market.

According to AP , the Biden administration insists that there is no evidence that the weapons that have been lost have been stolen or destined for the black market, although the reality is that it cannot know. What is truly worrying for the United States is not whether Ukraine is acting with weapons as it has with the supply of other goods and services supplied to the Armed Forces or whether they are being used as expected. As Responsible Statecraft explains , “the Ukraine case is particularly concerning given reports that Russia has captured several American weapons systems and is now reverse engineering them. “Gun control experts argue this may be a wake-up call for US officials.” The concern is not the proper use of weapons, their sale to evil actors or controlling corruption in Ukraine, but whether Russia can get hold of them.

https://slavyangrad.es/2024/01/14/armas-comprometidas/

Google Translator

*******

What's happening in the Northern Military District zone: chronicle for January 13
January 14, 2024
Rybar

Image

After a short break, Russian troops again launched massive attacks on the western and central regions of the so-called. Ukraine , using, among other things, Kh-101 cruise missiles, Kinzhal ballistic missiles and Geran-2 drones.

According to footage published by the Ukrainian side, one of the ammunition fell in Shostka , Sumy region, in close proximity to the Impulse plant, which specializes in the production of ammunition and explosive devices. However, at the moment, no information confirming a hit on the object itself has been published.

In the Seversky direction, the “fog of war” has partially cleared. Apparently, after reaching the outskirts of the village of Spornoe , the assault detachments of the Russian Armed Forces were unable to build on their success and were forced to retreat to reserve positions. There are no Russian fighters on the outskirts of the village.

Meanwhile, in the Bakhmut direction, Russian troops managed to somewhat expand the zone of control. At Bogdanovka, assault troops advanced into the forest belt north-west of the village, and in the Kleshcheevka area , servicemen of the Russian Armed Forces managed to knock out the enemy from some of the heights.

In the Avdeevsky direction, Russian troops are still storming enemy defenses in the area of ​​the treatment facilities: according to pro-Ukrainian channels, units of the Russian Armed Forces managed to advance in the area up to 250-300 meters. However, due to the lack of personnel, it is not possible to establish the exact configuration of the front.

Another footage of the successful use of the Lancet : this time the target was the Strela-10 air defense system . After being hit by a kamikaze drone, the vehicle caught fire, and during the fire there was even a spontaneous launch of a missile from the ammunition load.

When analyzing the latest footage of the use of the Lancet, one can see an interesting point: if previously the video from the camera of the loitering munition was broadcast right up to the hit, now much more often the videos show only the moment of capture and direct destruction of the target.

It can be assumed that this is also due to the wider use of auto-capture and tracking systems based on neural networks in drones, when the operator no longer has to drive the device in all areas. The main advantage is higher resistance to electronic warfare.

In general, it is interesting to observe how, literally before our eyes, artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being introduced into a variety of weapons systems. The question is what methods of countering them will eventually appear on the battlefield.

And it is possible that in the foreseeable future it will be possible to see combat lasers or electromagnetic guns to combat swarms of autonomous drones.

Massive strikes by the Russian Armed Forces against enemy targets

At night, Russian troops again carried out a combined massive attack on targets in the so-called territory. Ukraine . Explosions occurred in the western and central regions of the country. The Russian Armed Forces used a large arsenal of weapons, including Kh-101 cruise missiles, Kinzhal ballistic missiles, Geran-2 drones, as well as other air-to-surface missiles Kh-59 and Kh-31P.

Local residents reported explosions in the Ivano - Frankivsk and Rivne regions , as well as Kropyvnytskyi , Kremenchug , Dnepropetrovsk and Chernigov .


And in Shostka , according to the “Revenge of Goodwill” channel, hits hit the Impulse military plant , which specializes in the production of ammunition. At the same time, this enterprise remains the only facility in the so-called. Ukraine, where detonation devices are produced, including EDC electric detonators. However, no footage was published that could confirm a hit on the plant territory.

At the same time, it is curious that if usually representatives of the Ukrainian formations loudly declare that they successfully repelled the raid, then here they reported the shooting down of several munitions. This indirectly indicates that a significant part of the missiles still reached their targets.


At the same time, footage of an emergency discharge of ammunition between the villages of Pavlovskaya and Atamanskaya in the Krasnodar Territory was published on the Internet . The regional operational headquarters confirmed the incident, reporting no damage or casualties.


And in the Ryazan region they discovered the tail cap from the Kinzhal hypersonic missile: apparently, one of the local residents took away the remains of the missile in an unknown direction.

The situation on the front line and combat operations

Image
In the North Ukrainian direction, the situation has not undergone significant changes: artillery duels continue along the entire line of contact. At the same time, according to SHOT, the Ukrainian Armed Forces fired cluster munitions at the village of Telets in the Bryansk region : there was no information about damage or casualties.

Image
In the Slobozhansky direction, Russian troops launched a series of attacks on objects and positions of Ukrainian formations along the border. Ukrainian authorities reported arrivals in Zolochev and Volchansk in the Kharkov region . In turn, the Ukrainian Armed Forces used kamikaze drones to attack the village of Mokraya Orlovka in the Belgorod region : one civilian was injured and was hospitalized with shrapnel wounds at the nearest medical facility.

Image
In the Kupyansk direction, positional battles continue in the Sinkovka area , while at the same time attacks are being carried out on the positions of Ukrainian formations in front-line settlements. Despite reports from some media about the alleged advance of the Russian Armed Forces in the sector, in reality the configuration of the front remains unchanged for a long time.

In the Liman direction, mutual attacks continue in the area of ​​Serebryansky forestry and the Torsky ledge . At the same time, the sides are conducting artillery duels and counter-battery combat along the entire line of contact.

Image
In the Seversky direction, the configuration of the front became somewhat clearer: after reaching the outskirts of Spornoye, Russian troops were unable to gain a foothold in the sector and were forced to retreat to prepared lines. Ukrainian formations are attempting counterattacks, but are not successful.

Image
In the Bakhmut direction, Russian troops continue to fight on the left flank, but no visible successes have been recorded in recent days. Meanwhile, to the south, units of the Russian Armed Forces managed to advance northwest of Kleshcheevka , knocking out Ukrainian formations from part of the heights. At the moment, assault troops are trying to gain a foothold in the area.

Image
In the Avdeevsky direction, Russian units continue to fight in the area of ​​treatment facilities. At the same time, Ukrainian channels announced the advancement of military personnel of the Russian Armed Forces in an area of ​​up to 250-300 meters, however, due to the lack of personnel, it is not possible to establish the exact configuration of the front. In addition, positional clashes are still observed in the Petrovsky ( Stepovoy ) area.

Image
In the Donetsk direction, Russian troops continue to try to improve the tactical position towards Georgievka , advancing from the area of ​​the Church of St. George. Ukrainian formations are striking at assault groups of the Russian Armed Forces, trying to prevent the loss of controlled territories in the area.

At the same time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces continue to fire at populated areas of the Donetsk agglomeration with cannon and rocket artillery. At the same time, a woman was injured in the Kirovsky district of Donetsk. While an emergency medical team was examining the victim, the enemy dropped an explosive ordnance from a drone, resulting in minor injuries to the ambulance driver. Damage to residential buildings and civil infrastructure was also recorded in the region. At the same time, another attempt was made to strike Mariupol using a converted S-200. The launch was carried out from the Zaporozhye region , and the rocket fell on the outskirts of the city without causing damage, which is not surprising, given its low accuracy.

Image
In the Vremevsky sector, positional battles continued along the entire line of the sector. It was reported about a successful attack by the Russian Armed Forces north of Kermenchik and Staromlynovka , during which they managed to occupy a number of fortified enemy positions. At the same time, the Ukrainian Armed Forces attempted an offensive in the Staromayorsky area , but after suffering losses, they retreated.

Image
In the Zaporozhye direction, fighting continued at Rabotino , where Russian assault groups are gradually knocking out the enemy from their positions. According to some reports, the Russian Armed Forces advanced to the southeast of the settlement, as well as in the area northwest of neighboring Verbovoy. At the same time, the Russian army continued to strike at concentrations of enemy manpower and equipment in the Rabotino and Zherebyanok areas . However, the situation in this sector of the front remains tense: the enemy is actively using UAVs and artillery, striking our positions.

Image
In addition, two Ukrainian Armed Forces drones with combat loads attempted to attack the port crane and berth No. 4 in Berdyansk . Both drones were shot down, but the debris landed near a moored tugboat, injuring one person. No damage to infrastructure was recorded. This raid is more like testing air defenses than an actual attack. Too few drones were used. But trends suggest that a more massive attack is possible in the coming days.

Image
In the Kherson direction, positional battles continue in the Krynok area . Worsening weather conditions make it difficult to transfer additional reserves of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to the left bank of the Dnieper, which gives Russian forces a certain advantage.

In turn, Ukrainian formations continued to shell settlements on the left bank of the Kherson region . Thus, the following villages were subjected to enemy shelling: Krynki , Golaya Pristan , Peschanovka , Aleshki , Staraya Zburevka , Podstepnoye , as well as Dnepryany in the Novokakhovsky district, which suffered the greatest damage. In addition, it was reported that air defense forces intercepted a Ukrainian missile in the Chaplinka area . An attempted strike from the HIMARS MLRS on the positions of the 20th Anti-Aircraft Missile Regiment was also noted. Two MLRS rockets were shot down from the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system.


At the same time, in our reports from the Kherson direction one could often read about the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ bridgehead in the village of Krynki , which became a “corral” for Ukrainian formations and is now literally mowed down by artillery fire and air strikes. But, as they say, it’s better to see once: the video from the enemy’s side clearly shows the landscape in the long-suffering populated area. The trees have been mowed down, at most only pieces of walls remain from the houses, and the ground is pitted with craters from aerial bombs and shells. By the way, the weather recently added problems to the Armed Forces of Ukraine - the channels on the approaches to Krynki were partially frozen. Boats cannot pass, and it is also difficult to do this on foot - not everywhere the ice can support a fighter with equipment and ammunition. All this will clearly affect the enemy’s losses and supplies in this small area on the left bank of the Dnieper.

Political events
On the death of journalist Gonzalo Lira in a Ukrainian prison


The US State Department officially confirmed the death of journalist Gonzalo Lira in Ukraine . According to representatives of the investigative project Grayzone , while in custody, a 55-year-old American citizen of Chilean origin was beaten in a pre-trial detention center and denied assistance despite a serious lung disease.

The name of Gonzalo Lira became known at the very beginning of the SVO, when he was kidnapped by the SBU in April 2022 for criticizing the Kiev regime and exposing Western propaganda . The journalist was later released, but was detained again in May 2023 and later sent to prison, where he subsequently died from the effects of torture and other medical complications.

Naturally, no attempts to rescue a US citizen from the so-called. There was no action taken on Ukraine in Washington, although major media figures like Elon Musk drew attention to the problem . The reason is simple: for the American state machine or human rights organizations, Gonzalo Lira is a wrong journalist who is not worth protecting.

The death of a foreign media worker from torture in a Ukrainian pre-trial detention center is the clearest manifestation of the policy of the Kyiv regime in matters of the scale of censorship in the information field and the fight against any criticism and deviations from the line of state propaganda. Back in August , Western publications complained about this en masse .

Now we can hardly expect any drastic steps by the United States regarding the so-called. Ukraine. However, in the future, nothing will prevent people in Washington from using this as a lever of pressure on the Kiev regime at the right time. For example, when deciding to replace Zelensky, who could be labeled an oppressor of freedom of speech and a killer of journalists.

https://rybar.ru/chto-proishodit-v-zone ... -yanvarya/

Google Translator

*******

US Launches Strikes on Yemen, and Other Updates

ImageSIMPLICIUS THE THINKER
JAN 12, 2024

<snip>

In the meantime, the only interesting things out of Ukraine at the moment:

The Institute for the Study of War managed to admit not only that Russia has all the initiative but that it has 95% staffing of its units, which allows timely and professional rotation and force generation:

Image

Image

They go on to note:

6/ Russia’s ability to conduct operational level rotations will likely allow Russian forces to maintain the overall tempo of their localized offensive operations in eastern Ukraine in the near term.

In short: Russian units are well-staffed, easily make up for any losses, and have all the operational tempo and initiative. Ukraine on the other hand, we learned in the last update, is suffering 30,000 losses per month and for the first time—according to some reports—was not able to replenish these monthly losses via mobilization recently.

Reports like the following continue to roll out in corroboration:

Image

https://abcnews.go.com/International/ho ... =106197525
Here’s the truth of it though:

On the tactical front, Ukraine is showing itself extremely well. In many cases they are even superior to the Russian forces on a given front or level, owing to their defensive positions and the advantage thereof, as well as their craftier use of UAV technology and NATO ISR capabilities.

However, where a lot of the disproportionate damage is being done is in the field of totally unstoppable operational depth Russian strikes. Ukraine’s air defenses are now more depleted than ever, and conversely, Russia’s air arsenal is stronger than ever because all of its PGM (precision guided munition) productive capacities have continued to go up parabolically. They are firing more missiles and other types of weapons than ever, particularly the growing portfolio of UMPK bombs.

In the last report we learned about Russia adapting RBK-500 cluster munitions, now we have full confirmation they are also using 1500kg Fabs as well as even ODAB-1500 thermobarics. Today Shoigu visited the UMPK assembly line, giving us a rare firsthand look at some of the innovations being done in real time: (Video at link.)


In the above you can even see a never-before-seen test of one of the bombs, showing how it turns over after release before spreading its wings.

Given these increases, Ukraine’s positions in the rear are being struck with major losses incurred each time. For instance, since the last report—where I listed several “rear sites” that were hit with major losses—there has been a new hit on a mercenary hotel in Kharkov.

The drone war also continues to heat up, with a recent article admitting Ukrainian soldiers are forced to outright abandon their vehicles because Russian drones mercilessly destroy them all:

Image

https://news.yahoo.com/ukrainian-soldie ... 08527.html

Men of his unit said that for the past few months, they had been leaving their armored vehicles behind and walking six miles to positions on the front line, the Times reported. "You can only go in on foot," the guardsman added.

Men of the 117th Brigade in the Zaporizhzhia region faced an unpleasant four-mile hike in the rain and mud, an intelligence commander told the Times. If they took their vehicles to drive ammunition or food to the front line, Russia's drones could attack from above.


Last time we reported rumors of Russian AI integration into FPVs, now we have the actual confirmation of that from Ukraine’s premier drone master, the infamous commander Magyar: (Video at link.)

Unfortunately, despite these advances, Russian troops are not in too much better a position. Ukraine’s own drone mastery is soaring to new heights and Russian vehicles are being overwhelmed by them on almost every front when going on assault. As I explained before, Russia’s rear areas seem well protected, but no one has yet mastered good drone repulsion on assault, when you’ve overextended past your rear EW shield.

Ukraine has even begun rolling out vehicle protection units like the following for their most valuable armor, like this German Marder below:

Image

Ukrainian Armed Forces equip armored vehicles with Sania anti-drone silencers.

The social network published footage showing a German-made Marder 1A3 infantry fighting vehicle, belonging to the 10th Army Corps of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, equipped with the Sania system, designed to counter drones with a first-person view (FPV).

The Sania system offers a dual approach to UAV defense: detection and suppression. The system detector scans for the presence of FPV drones within a radius of 1.5 km. When they are detected, an anti-drone “jammer” is activated, capable of suppressing signals that control the UAV at a distance of up to 1 km.




By the way, interestingly, as the war goes extremely ‘high tech’ in one direction, it contradictorily goes backwards in others as a response to this. You see, because the present post-modern battlefield is so infused with signal noise and electromagnetic oversaturation, Russian forces are finding some recourse in ancient technologies.

Below it can be seen, they are collecting disused WWII era telephone and communications lines because they have proven to be most reliable and resistant to the modern EW environment: (Video at link.)

Furthermore, such physical ground lines of communication are especially suited for the current positional type of warfare where not much forward advancement is made in a short period of time because it allows you to lay direct lines between various headquarters and units without worrying that it will all need to be relaid when the battalion headquarters shifts up several kilometers during advance.

Keep in mind though, physical comms wiring is normal and standard even besides this, as there is nothing that beats the reliability and security of it, but I think it’s now being used even more than ever. This is particularly due to the fact that one of the Russian army’s biggest and most disappointing weaknesses, which the war helped to reveal, is their communications systems.

There are some good systems and their communications are typically all right when it comes to the higher levels of the echelons, i.e. brigades talking to corps and higher, but when it comes to smaller formations and sections communicating, it often gets messy. The Russian army standard encrypted Azart radios—the equivalent of American Harris systems—have been lampooned since the beginning as plagued with scandal, forcing many Russian units to rely on cheap consumer grade Chinese Baofengs which are infinitely crackable and interceptable.

As a rule, usually the cheaper Baofengs and such are used within close range only, like for instance an artillery battery commander communicating firing directions to his gunners inside the self-propelled howitzer nearby. This is deemed relatively safe because the radios don’t have huge range anyway, so their signal cannot be reliably intercepted. Communications to distant units are typically done with encrypted and more standardized sets like Azart—but there are still many issues that need to be worked out and Russian troops often complain of communications problems between units at medium distances of 5-15km.

This is one area where the US and NATO have a distinct advantage. However, it must be said this advantage is mostly on paper and not proven in a real life EW contested environment. I say that because there are many reports hinting at major NATO problems in this field as well; for instance reported problems in German Marders/Leopards in training grounds specifically citing their comms systems not functioning, and commanders being forced to open the hatch to “yell” instructions to nearby units.

Also:

Image

Image

Image

And from their actual wikipedia:

Image

As you can see, this is a problem many of the world’s top armies struggle with.

(Much more at link, check it out)

https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/us- ... -yemen-and

******

Tusk’s Appeal For Patriots To Support Ukraine Is A Distraction From Poland’s Political Crisis

Image

ANDREW KORYBKO
JAN 14, 2024

The returning premier’s latest remarks are clearly trying to distract from his country’s worst political crisis since the 1980s while simultaneously discrediting his predecessor and those bonafide Polish patriots who’ve soured on Ukraine in recent months as well. The innuendo is that any Pole who doesn’t support a forever war in Ukraine is betraying their country’s national interests, but the reality is the opposite since patriots should support freezing the conflict as soon as possible.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk just declared in an interview that “Every Polish patriot must absolutely recognize” that “There can be no doubts about the war and our commitment, and that of the entire Western world, to Ukraine in its confrontation with Russia.” He then claimed that “situation in Ukraine and on the front is absolutely the number one issue for Polish security.” His comments came ahead of a planned trip to Kiev after the Ukrainian Conflict began to wind down late last year.

His appeal to Polish patriots to support Ukraine is an attempted distraction from his country’s worst political crisis since the 1980s, which was provoked by his seizure of national media and the arrest of two former ministers on legally dubious pretexts. Readers can learn more about his de facto liberal-globalist coup, which also involves importing illegal immigrants that could easily include those civilizationally dissimilar ones who don’t want to assimilate and integrate, in the preceding hyperlinked analysis.

The more specific context in which Tusk tried to spin support for Ukraine concerns the ongoing blockade of that country’s border by a group of Polish farmers and truckers, who are protesting the impact that EU policies in favor of Kiev have had on their livelihood. Former Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki also admitted in an interview with British media last week that the Ukrainian Conflict “is not going in the right direction” after Kiev’s counteroffensive “was not successful” in turning the tide.

While he claimed that the silver lining is that the West has united against Russia, the overall tone of his comments was negative and implied exhaustion with this conflict, which aligns with the emerging Mainstream Media narrative over the past one-quarter of a year. Tusk’s tone was altogether different, and he even said that he won’t tolerate so-called “anti-Ukrainian sentiment” in his administration, unlike what he alleged had characterized Morawiecki’s near its end.

Taken together, the returning premier’s latest remarks are clearly trying to distract from his country’s worst political crisis since the 1980s while simultaneously discrediting his predecessor and those bonafide Polish patriots who’ve soured on Ukraine in recent months as well. The innuendo is that any Pole who doesn’t support a forever war in Ukraine is betraying their country’s national interests after he also said that “As long as Ukraine is at war with Russia, we are relatively safe.”

Objectively speaking, the reality is actually the opposite since a protracted conflict will further drain Polish economic and military resources together with increasing the risk of “mission creep”, which could be accelerated by a Russian breakthrough along the front or another wayward missile hitting Poland. Nevertheless, Tusk is doubling down on Ukraine despite most of the West distancing itself from it, and this is arguably being done to advance German hegemonic interests instead of Polish national ones.

The former ruling party’s chairman Jaroslaw Kaczynski repeatedly warned that he’s a “German agent” who was sent back from Brussels, where he earlier served as the European Council president, at Berlin’s behest in order to do its bidding in his homeland. In the Ukrainian context, perpetuating the conflict serves to imbue a sense of urgency to a leading German NATO official’s plan for a “military Schengen” that would in essence result in the large-scale return of that country’s troops to Poland.

They could then help Tusk retain control if he comes to distrust the local police, members of the intelligence community, and/or the armed forces in the event that the joint the new Solidarity movement that the conservative-nationalist opposition is unofficially trying to form. With this in mind, it’s arguably the case that the most patriotic position that any Pole can have at present is to support peace talks aimed at freezing this conflict exactly as NATO’s former Supreme Commander suggested.

Admiral James Stavridis proposed this solution in an op-ed for Bloomberg in mid-November, which he put forth with the sincere intent of advancing the West’s collective interests, including Poland’s. Tusk’s latest remarks scandalously imply that NATO’s former Supreme Commander is flirting with threats to “Polish security”, which can only be safeguarded “As long as Ukraine is at war with Russia”, but there’s no truth to what he’s hinting about him or those Poles who share his envisaged solution.

It's actually insulting to insinuate anything of the sort, as well as the notion that Poland can only remain “relatively safe” as long as there’s an armed conflict raging in a neighboring nation. The only reason why Tusk would resort to such rhetoric is out of desperation to discredit his opponents and distract from his country’s worst political crisis since the 1980s, which shows that he’s feeling the heat after last week’s large protest in Warsaw and that patriots should thus intensify their efforts to protect Polish democracy.

https://korybko.substack.com/p/tusks-ap ... to-support
"There is great chaos under heaven; the situation is excellent."

Post Reply